UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
OR
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-13782
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
1001 Air Brake Avenue
Wilmerding, Pennsylvania 15148
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Class
Name of Exchange on which registered
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) Yes ¨ No ¨.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x.
The registrant estimates that as of June 30, 2009, the aggregate market value of the voting shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1.4 billion based on the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange for such stock.
As of February 22, 2010, 47,619,699 shares of Common Stock of the registrant were issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2010 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
19
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
39
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
2
PART I
General
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation, doing business as Wabtec Corporation, is a Delaware corporation with headquarters at 1001 Air Brake Avenue in Wilmerding, Pennsylvania. Our telephone number is 412-825-1000, and our website is located at www.wabtec.com. All references to “we”, “our”, “us”, the “Company” and “Wabtec” refer to Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and its subsidiaries. Westinghouse Air Brake Company (“WABCO”) was formed in 1990 when it acquired certain assets and operations from American Standard, Inc., now known as Trane (“Trane”). In 1999, WABCO merged with MotivePower Industries, Inc. (“MotivePower”) and adopted the name Wabtec.
Today, Wabtec is one of the world’s largest providers of value-added, technology-based equipment and services for the global rail industry. We believe we hold approximately a 50% market share in North America for our primary braking-related equipment and a leading position in North America for most of our other product lines. Our highly engineered products, which are intended to enhance safety, improve productivity and reduce maintenance costs for customers, can be found on virtually all U.S. locomotives, freight cars, subway cars and buses. In 2009, the Company had sales of about $1.4 billion and net income of about $115.1 million. In 2009 sales of aftermarket parts and services represented about 54% of total sales, while sales to customers outside of the U.S. accounted for about 40% of total sales.
Industry Overview
The Company primarily serves the worldwide freight rail and passenger transit industries. As such, our operating results are largely dependent on the level of activity, financial condition and capital spending plans of the global railroad and transit industries. Many factors influence these industries, including general economic conditions; rail traffic, as measured by freight tonnage and passenger ridership; government spending on public transportation; and investment in new technologies by freight rail and passenger transit systems.
According to a 2008 study by UNIFE, the Association of the European Rail Industry, the global market for railway products and services is more than $100.0 billion. The three largest markets, which represent about 85% of the total market, are Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific. Over the next decade, Asia-Pacific is expected to be the fastest-growing region and to surpass the North American market.
In North America, railroads carry about 43% of intercity freight, as measured by ton-miles, which is more than any other mode of transportation. They are an integral part of the continent’s economy and transportation system, serving nearly every industrial, wholesale and retail sector. Through direct ownership and operating partnerships, U.S. railroads are part of an integrated network that includes railroads in Canada and Mexico, forming what is regarded as the world’s most-efficient and lowest-cost freight rail service. There are more than 500 railroads operating in North America, with the largest railroads, referred to as “Class I,” accounting for more than 90% of the industry’s revenues. Although the railroads carry a wide variety of commodities and goods, coal is the single-largest item, representing about 40% of carloadings in 2009. Intermodal traffic—the movement of trailers or containers by rail in combination with another mode of transportation—has been the railroads’ fastest-growing market segment in the past 10 years. Railroads operate in a competitive environment, especially with the trucking industry, and are always seeking ways to improve safety, cost and reliability. New technologies offered by Wabtec and others in the industry can provide some of these benefits.
Demand for our freight related products and services in North America are driven by a number of factors, including:
Rail traffic. The Association of American Railroads (AAR) compiles statistics that gauge the level of activity in the freight rail industry. Two important statistics are revenue ton-miles and
3
carloadings, which are generally referred to as “rail traffic”. In 2009, revenue ton-miles decreased 15.1% and carloadings decreased 16.1% as rail traffic was negatively impacted by the economic recession in the U.S. Although rail traffic was down for the year, revenue ton-miles increased 6% and carloadings increased 3% in the second half of the year, compared to the first half of the year, reflecting some improvement in the overall economy.
Demand for new locomotives. Currently, the active locomotive fleet for Class I railroads in North America is about 24,000 units. The average number of new locomotives delivered over the past 10 years was about 1,100 annually. In 2009, about 700 new, heavy-haul locomotives were delivered, compared to about 1,500 in 2008.
Demand for new freight cars. Currently, the active freight car fleet in North America is about 1.4 million. The average number of new freight cars delivered over the past 10 years was about 47,000 annually. In 2009, about 21,000 new freight cars were delivered, compared to about 60,000 cars in 2008.
In the U.S., the passenger transit industry is dependent largely on funding from federal, state and local governments, and from fare box revenues. With about 40% of the nation’s passenger transit vehicles, the New York City region is the largest passenger transit market in the U.S., but most major cities also offer either rail or bus transit services.
Demand for North American passenger transit products is driven by a number of factors, including:
Government funding. The U.S. federal government provides money to local transit authorities, primarily to fund the purchase of new equipment and infrastructure for their transit systems. Under a multi-year spending bill known as SAFETEA-LU, federal government funding has increased on average by 6-8% annually since 2005. Due in part to this increased government funding, the number of cars delivered in 2009 remained well above the ten year average, at about 1,300, compared to 1,569 in 2008; and the number of new buses delivered in 2009 increased to about 5,800, compared to about 5,100 in 2008. In the past 10 years, the average number of new transit cars delivered is about 600, and the average number of new buses delivered is about 4,800. SAFETEA-LU expired in September 2009 but funding has been maintained at current levels until a new bill is completed. In February 2009, the U.S. federal government passed additional spending legislation designed to stimulate the U.S. economy. Of the $789 billion spending package, up to $20 billion is to be spent on freight and passenger transportation, as follows: $8.4 billion for public transportation, $8.0 billion for high-speed rail, $1.5 billion for discretionary intermodal projects, and $1.3 billion for AMTRAK. Wabtec expects to benefit from this additional spending, as transit authorities invest in expansion, new equipment and other related projects.
Ridership. Ridership provides fare box revenues to transit authorities, which use these funds, along with state and local money, primarily for equipment and system maintenance. Based on preliminary figures from the American Public Transportation Association, ridership on U.S. transit vehicles decreased about 4% in 2009, mainly due to the economic recession. Prior to 2009, ridership had increased for six consecutive years.
Outside of North America, many of the rail systems have historically been focused on passenger transit, rather than freight. In recent years, however, railroads in countries such as Australia, India and China have been investing capital to expand and improve both their freight and passenger rail systems. Throughout the world, some government-owned railroads are being sold to private owners, who often look to improve the efficiency of the rail system by investing in new equipment and new technologies. These investment programs represent opportunities for Wabtec to provide products and services.
In Europe, the majority of the rail system serves the passenger transit market, which is expected to continue growing as high fuel costs and environmental factors encourage investment in public mass transit. France,
4
Germany, the United Kingdom and Italy are the largest transit markets, representing about two-thirds of passenger traffic in the European Union. About 75% of freight traffic in Europe is hauled by truck, while rail accounts for about 20%. The largest freight markets in Europe are Germany, Poland and the United Kingdom. According to UNIFE, the European market consists of about 33,000 locomotives, about 700,000 freight cars and about 150,000 passenger transit cars. In recent years, the European market purchased on average about 1,300 new locomotives, about 1,000 new freight cars and about 7,500 new passenger transit cars annually.
The Asia/Pacific market is expected to be the second-largest geographic segment by 2016, according to the UNIFE study. Growth is expected to be driven by the continued urbanization of countries such as China and India, and by investment in freight rail infrastructure to serve the mining and natural resources markets in those countries, as well as in Australia. According to UNIFE, this market consists of about 34,000 locomotives and about 1.0 million freight cars. In recent years, China has embarked on a major rail capital investment program, and is expected to spend a record amount of about $120 billion in 2010.
Business Segments and Products
We provide our products and services through two principal business segments, the Freight Group and the Transit Group, both of which have different market characteristics and business drivers.
The Freight Group primarily manufactures and services components for new and existing freight cars and locomotives, builds new switcher locomotives, rebuilds freight locomotives and provides related heat exchange and cooling systems. Customers include large, publicly traded railroads, leasing companies, manufacturers of original equipment such as locomotives and freight cars and utilities. As discussed previously, demand in the freight market is primarily driven by rail traffic, and deliveries of new locomotives and freight cars. In 2009, the Freight Group accounted for 42% of our total sales, with about two-thirds of its sales in North America and the remainder to International customers. About two-thirds of the Freight Group’s sales are in the aftermarket and the remainder in the original equipment market.
The Transit Group primarily manufactures and services components for new and existing passenger transit vehicles, typically subway cars and buses, builds new commuter locomotives and refurbishes subway cars. Customers include public transit authorities and municipalities, leasing companies and manufacturers of subway cars and buses around the world. As discussed previously, demand in the transit market is primarily driven by government funding at all levels and passenger ridership. In 2009, the Transit Group accounted for 58% of our total sales, with about half of its sales in North America and the remainder to International customers and about half in the aftermarket and half in the original equipment market.
Following is a summary of our leading product lines across both of our business segments:
Railway braking equipment and related components
Freight car truck components and undercarriage components
Draft gears, couplers and slack adjusters
Air compressors and dryers
Positive train control equipment and electronically controlled pneumatic braking products
Railway electronics, including event recorders, monitoring equipment and end of train devices
Friction products, including brake shoes and pads
Rail and bus door assemblies
Accessibility lifts and ramps for buses and subway cars
5
Heat exchangers and cooling products for locomotives and power generation equipment
Commuter and switcher locomotives
Transit car and locomotive overhauls
We have become a leader in the rail industry by capitalizing on the strength of our existing products, technological capabilities and new product innovation, and by our ability to harden products to protect them from severe conditions, including extreme temperatures and high-vibration environments. Over the past several years, we introduced a number of significant new products including electronic braking equipment and train control equipment that encompasses onboard digital data and global positioning communication protocols. In 2007, for example, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) approved the use of our Electronic Train Management System®, which offers safety benefits to the rail industry. In 2008, the U.S. federal government enacted a rail safety bill that mandates the use of positive train control technology on a majority of the locomotives and track in the U.S. by December 31, 2015. As the only supplier with a train control product that has received FRA approval, Wabtec is working with the railroads and transit authorities to implement this technology. Supported by our technical staff of over 475 engineers and specialists, we have extensive experience in a broad range of product lines, which enables us to provide comprehensive, systems-based solutions for our customers. We currently own over 1,250 active patents worldwide and over 500 U.S. patents. During the last three years, we have filed for more than 350 patents worldwide in support of our new and evolving product lines.
For additional information on our business segments, see Note 20 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
Competitive Strengths
Our key strengths include:
Leading market positions in core products. Dating back to 1869 and George Westinghouse’s invention of the air brake; we are an established leader in the development and manufacture of pneumatic braking equipment for freight and passenger transit vehicles. We have leveraged our leading position by focusing on research and engineering to expand beyond pneumatic braking components to supplying integrated parts and assemblies for the locomotive through the end of the train. We are a recognized leader in the development and production of electronic recording, measuring and communications systems, highly engineered compressors and heat exchangers for locomotives and a leading manufacturer of freight car components, including electronic braking equipment, draft gears, trucks, brake shoes and electronic end-of-train devices. We are also the leading manufacturer of commuter locomotives and a leading provider of braking equipment, door assemblies, lifts and ramps, and couplers for passenger transit vehicles.
Breadth of product offering with a stable mix of original equipment market (OEM) and aftermarket business. Our product portfolio is one of the broadest in the rail industry, as we offer a wide selection of quality parts, components and assemblies across the entire train. We believe this comprehensive product offering enables us to leverage our installed base to maintain our leadership position with OEMs and the Class I railroads. We provide our products in both the original equipment market and the aftermarket. Our substantial installed base of products with end-users such as the railroads and the passenger transit authorities is a significant competitive advantage for providing products and services to the aftermarket because these customers often look to purchase safety and performance-related replacement parts from the original equipment components supplier. In addition, as OEMs and Class I railroad operators attempt to modernize fleets with new products designed to improve and maintain safety and efficiency, these products must be designed to be interoperable with existing equipment. Over the last several years, more than 50% of our total net sales have come from our aftermarket products and services business.
6
Leading design and engineering capabilities. We believe a hallmark of our relationship with our customers has been our leading design and engineering practice, which has, in our opinion, assisted in the improvement and modernization of global railway equipment. We believe both our customers and the government authorities value our technological capabilities and commitment to innovation, as we seek not only to enhance the efficiency and profitability of our customers, but also to improve the overall safety of the railways through continuous improvement of product performance. The Company has an established record of product improvements and new product development. We have assembled a wide range of patented products, which we believe provides us with a competitive advantage. Wabtec currently owns over 1,250 active patents worldwide and over 500 U.S. patents. During the last three years, we have filed for more than 350 patents worldwide in support of our new and evolving product lines.
Experience with industry regulatory requirements. The U.S. rail industry is governed by the AAR and by the FRA. These groups mandate rigorous manufacturer certification and new product testing and approval processes that we believe are difficult for new entrants to meet cost-effectively and efficiently without the scale and extensive experience we possess.
Experienced management team and the Wabtec Performance System. Our executive management team has over 50 years of combined experience with the Company and has implemented numerous initiatives that enable us to manage successfully through cycles in the rail supply market. For example, the Wabtec Performance System (WPS), an ongoing program that focuses on lean manufacturing principles and continuous improvement across all aspects of our business, has been a part of the company’s culture for more than 20 years. As a result, our management team has improved our cost structure, operating leverage and financial flexibility and placed the Company in an excellent position to benefit from growth opportunities.
Business strategy
Using WPS, we strive to generate sufficient cash to invest in our growth strategies and to build on what we consider to be a leading position as a low-cost producer in the industry while maintaining world-class product quality, technology and customer responsiveness. Through WPS and employee-directed initiatives such as Kaizen, a Japanese-developed team concept, we strive to improve quality, delivery and productivity continuously, and to reduce costs. These efforts enable us to streamline processes, improve product reliability and customer satisfaction, reduce product cycle times and respond more rapidly to market developments. Over time, these lean initiatives have enabled us to increase operating margins, improve cash flow and strengthen our ability to invest in the following growth strategies:
Expand globally and into new product markets. We believe that international markets represent a significant opportunity for future growth. In 2009, sales to non-U.S. customers were $563.4 million, including export sales from the Company’s U.S. operations of $241.3 million. We intend to increase our existing international sales through strategic acquisitions, direct sales of products through our existing subsidiaries and licensees, and joint ventures with railway suppliers which have a strong presence in their local markets. We are specifically targeting markets that operate significant fleets of U.S.-style locomotives and freight cars, including Australia, China, India, Russia, South Africa, and select areas within Europe and South America. In addition, we have opportunities to sell certain products that we currently manufacture for the rail industry into other industrial markets, such as mining, off-highway and energy. These products include heat exchangers and friction materials.
Expand aftermarket sales. Historically, aftermarket sales are less cyclical than OEM sales because a certain level of aftermarket maintenance and service work must be performed, even during an industry slowdown. In 2009, Wabtec’s aftermarket sales and services represented approximately 54% of the Company’s total sales. Wabtec provides aftermarket parts and services for its components, and the Company is seeking to expand this business with new customers such as short-line and regional railroads, or with customers who currently perform the work in-house. In this way, we expect to take
7
advantage of the rail industry trend toward outsourcing, as railroads and transit authorities focus on their core function of transporting goods and people, rather than maintaining and servicing their equipment.
Accelerate new product development. We continue to emphasize research and development funding to create new and improved products. We are focusing on technological advances, especially in the areas of electronics, braking products and other on-board equipment, as a means of new product growth. We seek to provide customers with incremental technological advances that offer immediate benefits with cost-effective investments. In 2008, the U.S. federal government enacted a rail safety bill that mandates the use of positive train control technology on a majority of the locomotives and track in the U.S. by December 31, 2015. As the only supplier with a train control product that has received FRA approval, Wabtec is working with the railroads and transit authorities to implement this technology.
Seek acquisitions, joint ventures and alliances. We are exploring acquisition, joint venture and alliance opportunities using a disciplined, selective approach and rigorous financial criteria. We seek companies that will help Wabtec to grow profitably and expand geographically, while helping to dampen any impact from potential cycles in the North American rail industry. In 2009, Wabtec acquired Unifin, a leading manufacturer of cooling systems and related equipment for the power generation and transmission industry.
Recent Acquisitions and Joint Ventures
Wabtec has completed certain acquisitions in support of its growth strategies. On October 1, 2009, the Company used cash to acquire Unifin International LP, and its affiliate, Cardinal Pumps and Exchangers, Inc. (“Unifin”), a manufacturer of cooling systems and related equipment for the power generation and transmission industry for a net purchase price of $92.9 million.
In December 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the stock of Standard Car Truck Company (“SCT”), for $302.6 million, net of cash. SCT is a manufacturer and designer of stabilization systems for freight cars, including engineered truck (undercarriage) components such as springs, friction wedges and wear plates. Its Barber® brand truck design is used throughout the world and holds a leading share of the North American market. The company also manufactures and services locomotives components, including compressors and pumps. In October 2008, the Company acquired certain assets related to the development, sale, service, and maintenance of software programs used in train management systems for $4.5 million. In June 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the stock of POLI S.p.A. (“POLI”) for €55.2 million ($87.0 million), net of cash received. POLI is a European-based manufacturer of rail braking equipment including brake discs for high-speed applications, as well as tread brake units and pneumatic brake valves that meet International Union of Railways (“UIC”) standards.
In June 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the stock of Ricon Corporation (“Ricon”), a manufacturer of a variety of electro-mechanical wheelchair lifts and ramps and anti-graffiti windows for $73.6 million.
During 2008, Wabtec expanded its presence in key geographic areas. Wabtec acquired the majority of Beijing Wabtec Huaxia Technology Company, Ltd, which manufactures friction products for the freight car market and invested in a joint venture in China to manufacture other braking-related components. In addition, the Company formed a joint venture in South Africa to manufacture friction products.
Backlog
The Company’s backlog was about $951 million at December 31, 2009.
In 2009, about 54% of our sales came from aftermarket orders, which typically carry lead times of less than 30 days, so they are not recorded in backlog for a significant period of time. As such, the Company’s backlog is mostly an indicator of future original equipment sales, primarily for the Transit Group, and not aftermarket sales.
8
The Company’s contracts are subject to standard industry cancellation provisions, including cancellations on short notice or upon completion of designated stages. Substantial scope-of-work adjustments are common. For these and other reasons, completion of the Company’s backlog may be delayed or cancelled. The railroad industry, in general, has historically been subject to fluctuations due to overall economic conditions and the level of use of alternative modes of transportation.
The backlog of firm customer orders as of December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2008, and the expected year of completion are as follows:
In thousands
Freight Group
Transit Group
Total
Engineering and Development
To execute our strategy to develop new products, we invest in a variety of engineering and development activities. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, we invested about $42.4 million, $39.0 million and $37.4 million, respectively, on product development and improvement activities. Sometimes we conduct specific research projects in conjunction with universities, customers and other railroad product suppliers.
Our engineering and development program is largely focused upon train control and new braking technologies, with an emphasis on applying electronics to traditional pneumatic equipment. Electronic braking has been used in the transit industry for years, and freight railroads are beginning to conduct pilot programs to test its reliability and benefits. Freight railroads have generally been slower to accept the technology due to issues over interoperability, connectivity and durability. We are proceeding with efforts to enhance the major components for existing hard-wired braking equipment and development of new electronic technologies for the freight railroads.
We use our Product Development System (PDS) to develop and monitor new product programs. The system requires the product development team to follow consistent steps throughout the development process, from concept to launch, to ensure the product will meet customer expectations and internal profitability targets.
Intellectual Property
We have more than 1,250 active patents worldwide. We also rely on a combination of trade secrets and other intellectual property laws, nondisclosure agreements and other protective measures to establish and protect our proprietary rights in our intellectual property.
Certain trademarks, among them the name WABCO®, were acquired or licensed from American Standard Inc., now known as Trane, in 1990 at the time of our acquisition of the North American operations of the Railway Products Group of Trane. Other trademarks have been developed through the normal course of business, or acquired as a part of our ongoing merger and acquisition program.
We have entered into a variety of license agreements as licensor and licensee. We do not believe that any single license agreement is of material importance to our business or either of our business segments as a whole.
We have issued licenses to the two sole suppliers of railway air brakes and related products in Japan, Nabtesco and Mitsubishi Electric Company. The licensees pay annual license fees to us and also assist us by
9
acting as liaisons with key Japanese passenger transit vehicle builders for projects in North America. We believe that our relationships with these licensees have been beneficial to our core transit business and customer relationships in North America.
Customers
Our customers include railroads and passenger transit authorities throughout North America, as well as in the United Kingdom, Australia, Europe, Asia and South Africa; manufacturers of transportation equipment, such as locomotives, freight cars, subway vehicles and buses and lessors of such equipment.
In 2009, about 40% of our sales were to customers outside the U.S. and to approximately 100 countries throughout the world. About 54% of our sales were in the aftermarket, with a majority of our remaining sales to OEMs of locomotives, freight cars, subway vehicles and buses.
Our top customers can change from year to year. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, our top five customers, Alstom, Metrolinx (formerly GO Transit (“Greater Toronto Transit Authority”), Kawasaki Railcar Inc., GE Transportation Systems and HSBC Rail, accounted for 22% of our net sales. No one customer represents 10% or more of consolidated sales. We believe that we have strong relationships with all of our key customers.
Competition
We believe that we hold approximately a 50% market share in North America for our primary braking-related equipment and a leading market position in North America for most of our other product lines. On a global basis, our market shares are generally much smaller. We operate in a highly competitive marketplace. Price competition is strong because we have a relatively small number of customers and they are very cost-conscious.
In addition to price, competition is based on product performance and technological leadership, quality, reliability of delivery, and customer service and support.
Our principal competitors vary across product lines, but most competitors tend to be privately held companies. Within North America, New York Air Brake Company, a subsidiary of the German air brake producer Knorr-Bremse AG, is our principal overall OEM competitor. Our competition for locomotive, freight and passenger transit service and repair is primarily from the railroads’ and passenger transit authorities’ in-house operations, Electro-Motive Diesel, GE Transportation Systems, and New York Air Brake/Knorr. We believe our key strengths, which include leading market positions in core products, breadth of product offering with a stable mix of OEM and aftermarket business, leading design and engineering capabilities, significant barriers to entry and an experienced management team, enable us to compete effectively in this marketplace.
Employees
At December 31, 2009, we had 5,812 full-time employees, approximately 37% of whom were unionized. A majority of the employees subject to collective bargaining agreements are within North America and these agreements generally extend through 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. Agreements expiring in 2010 cover approximately 21% of the Company’s workforce. We consider our relations with our employees and union representatives to be good, but cannot assure that future contract negotiations will be favorable to us.
Regulation
In the course of our operations, we are subject to various regulations of agencies and other entities. In the United States, these include principally the FRA and the AAR. The FRA administers and enforces federal laws and regulations relating to railroad safety. These regulations govern equipment and safety standards for freight
10
cars and other rail equipment used in interstate commerce. The AAR oversees a wide variety of rules and regulations governing safety and design of equipment, relationships among railroads with respect to railcars in interchange and other matters. The AAR also certifies railcar builders and component manufacturers that provide equipment for use on railroads in the United States. New products generally must undergo AAR testing and approval processes. As a result of these regulations and those stipulated in other countries in which we derive our revenues, we must maintain certain certifications as a component manufacturer and for products we sell.
Effects of Seasonality
Our business is not typically seasonal, although the third quarter results may be impacted by vacation and plant shutdowns at several of our major customers during this period.
Environmental Matters
Information on environmental matters is included in Note 19 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
Available Information
We maintain an Internet site at www.wabtec.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as the annual report to stockholders and other information, are available free of charge on this site. The Internet site and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters of our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees, our Code of Conduct, which is applicable to all employees, and our Code of Ethics for Senior Officers, which is applicable to all of our executive officers, are also available free of charge on this site and are available in print to any shareholder who requests them.
Prolonged unfavorable economic and market conditions could adversely affect our business.
Unfavorable general economic and market conditions in the United States and internationally could have a negative impact on our sales and operations. To the extent that these factors result in continued instability of capital markets, shortages of raw materials or component parts, longer sales cycles, deferral or delay of customer orders or an inability to market our products effectively, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
We are dependent upon key customers.
We rely on several key customers who represent a significant portion of our business. Our top customers can change from year to year. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, our top five customers, Alstom, Metrolinx (formerly GO Transit (“Greater Toronto Transit Authority”), Kawasaki Railcar Inc., GE Transportation Systems and HSBC Rail, accounted for 22% of our net sales. While we believe our relationships with our customers are generally good, our top customers could choose to reduce or terminate their relationships with us. In addition, many of our customers place orders for products on an as-needed basis and operate in cyclical industries. As a result, their order levels have varied from period to period in the past and may vary significantly in the future. Such customer orders are dependent upon their markets and customers, and may be subject to delays and cancellations. As a result of our dependence on our key customers, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition if we lost any one or more of our key customers or if there is a reduction in their demand for our products.
11
Our business operates in a highly competitive industry.
We operate in a competitive marketplace and face substantial competition from a limited number of established competitors in the United States and abroad, some of which may have greater financial resources than we do. Price competition is strong and, coupled with the existence of a number of cost conscious purchasers, has historically limited our ability to increase prices. In addition to price, competition is based on product performance and technological leadership, quality, reliability of delivery and customer service and support. There can be no assurance that competition in one or more of our markets will not adversely affect us and our results of operations.
We intend to pursue acquisitions, joint ventures and alliances that involve a number of inherent risks, any of which may cause us not to realize anticipated benefits.
One aspect of our business strategy is to selectively pursue acquisitions, joint ventures and alliances that we believe will improve our market position, and provide opportunities to realize operating synergies. These transactions involve inherent risks and uncertainties, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, including:
difficulties in achieving identified financial and operating synergies, including the integration of operations, services and products;
diversion of Management’s attention from other business concerns;
the assumption of unknown liabilities; and
unanticipated changes in the market conditions, business and economic factors affecting such an acquisition.
We cannot assure that we will be able to consummate any future acquisitions, joint ventures or other business combinations. If we are unable to identify suitable acquisition candidates or to consummate strategic acquisitions, we may be unable to fully implement our business strategy, and our business and results of operations may be adversely affected as a result. In addition, our ability to engage in strategic acquisitions will be dependent on our ability to raise substantial capital, and we may not be able to raise the funds necessary to implement our acquisition strategy on terms satisfactory to us, if at all.
As we introduce new products and services, a failure to predict and react to consumer demand could adversely affect our business.
We have dedicated significant resources to the development, manufacturing and marketing of new products. Decisions to develop and market new transportation products are typically made without firm indications of customer acceptance. Moreover, by their nature, new products may require alteration of existing business methods or threaten to displace existing equipment in which our customers may have a substantial capital investment. There can be no assurance that any new products that we develop will gain widespread acceptance in the marketplace or that such products will be able to compete successfully with other new products or services that may be introduced by competitors. In addition, we may incur additional warranty or other costs as new products are tested and used by customers.
Our revenues are subject to cyclical variations in the railway and passenger transit markets and changes in government spending.
The railway industry historically has been subject to significant fluctuations due to overall economic conditions, the use of alternate methods of transportation and the levels of federal, state and local government spending on railroad transit projects. In economic downturns, railroads have deferred, and may defer, certain expenditures in order to conserve cash in the short term. Reductions in freight traffic may reduce demand for our replacement products.
12
The passenger transit railroad industry is also cyclical. New passenger transit car orders vary from year to year and are influenced greatly by major replacement programs and by the construction or expansion of transit systems by transit authorities. A substantial portion of our net sales have been, and we expect that a material portion of our future net sales may be, derived from contracts with metropolitan transit and commuter rail authorities and Amtrak. To the extent that future funding for proposed public projects is curtailed or withdrawn altogether as a result of changes in political, economic, fiscal or other conditions beyond our control, such projects may be delayed or cancelled, resulting in a potential loss of business for us, including transit aftermarket and new transit car orders. There can be no assurance that economic conditions will be favorable or that there will not be significant fluctuations adversely affecting the industry as a whole and, as a result, us.
A growing portion of our sales may be derived from our international operations, which exposes us to certain risks inherent in doing business on an international level.
In fiscal year 2009, approximately 40% of our consolidated net sales were to customers outside of the U.S. and we intend to continue to expand our international operations in the future. We currently conduct our international operations through a variety of wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, India, Italy, Macedonia, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Spain, South Africa, and the United Kingdom. As a result, we are subject to various risks, any one of which could have a material adverse effect on those operations and on our business as a whole, including:
lack of complete operating control;
lack of local business experience;
currency exchange fluctuations and devaluations;
foreign trade restrictions and exchange controls;
difficulty enforcing agreements and intellectual property rights;
the potential for nationalization of enterprises; and
economic, political and social instability and possible terrorist attacks against American interests.
In addition, certain jurisdictions have laws that limit the ability of non-U.S. subsidiaries and their affiliates to pay dividends and repatriate cash flows.
We may incur increased costs due to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
In the ordinary course of business, we are exposed to increases in interest rates that may adversely affect funding costs associated with variable-rate debt and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We may seek to minimize these risks through the use of interest rate swap contracts and currency hedging agreements. There can be no assurance that any of these measures will be effective. Any material changes in interest or exchange rates could result in material losses to us.
We may have liability arising from asbestos litigation.
Claims have been filed against the Company and certain of its affiliates in various jurisdictions across the United States by persons alleging bodily injury as a result of exposure to asbestos-containing products. Most of these claims have been made against our wholly owned subsidiary, Railroad Friction Products Corporation (RFPC), and are based on a product sold by RFPC prior to the time that the Company acquired any interest in RFPC.
Most of these claims, including all of the RFPC claims, are submitted to insurance carriers for defense and indemnity or to non-affiliated companies that retain the liabilities for the asbestos-containing products at issue. We cannot, however, assure that all these claims will be fully covered by insurance or that the indemnitors or insurers will remain financially viable. Our ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to these claims, as is the case with other pending litigation, cannot be estimated.
13
It is Management’s belief that the potential range of loss for asbestos-related bodily injury cases is not reasonably determinable at present due to a variety of factors, including: (1) the asbestos case settlement history of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, RFPC; (2) the unpredictable nature of personal injury litigation in general; and (3) the uncertainty of asbestos litigation in particular. Despite this uncertainty, and although the results of the Company’s operations and cash flows for any given period could be adversely affected by asbestos-related lawsuits, Management believes that the final resolution of the Company’s asbestos-related cases will not be material to the Company’s overall financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In general, this belief is based upon: (1) Wabtec’s and RFPC’s history of settlements and dismissals of asbestos-related cases to date; (2) the inability of many plaintiffs to establish any exposure or causal relationship to RFPC’s product; and (3) the inability of many plaintiffs to demonstrate any identifiable injury or compensable loss.
More specifically, as to RFPC, Management’s belief that any losses due to asbestos-related cases would not be material is also based on the fact that RFPC owns insurance which provides coverage for asbestos-related bodily injury claims. To date, RFPC’s insurers have provided RFPC with defense and indemnity in these actions. The overall number of new claims being filed against RFPC has dropped significantly in recent years; however, these new claims, and all previously filed claims, may take a significant period of time to resolve. As to Wabtec and its divisions, Management’s belief that asbestos-related cases will not have a material impact is also based on its position that it has no legal liability for asbestos-related bodily injury claims, and that the former owners of Wabtec’s assets retained asbestos liabilities for the products at issue. To date, Wabtec has been able to successfully defend itself on this basis, including two arbitration decisions and a judicial opinion, all of which confirmed Wabtec’s position that it did not assume any asbestos liabilities from the former owners of certain Wabtec assets. Although Wabtec has incurred defense and administrative costs in connection with asbestos bodily injury actions, these costs have not been material, and the Company has no information that would suggest these costs would become material in the foreseeable future.
We are subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations.
We are subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations governing discharges to air and water, the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous or solid waste materials and the remediation of contamination associated with releases of hazardous substances. We believe our operations currently comply in all material respects with all of the various environmental laws and regulations applicable to our business; however, there can be no assurance that environmental requirements will not change in the future or that we will not incur significant costs to comply with such requirements.
Future climate change regulation could result in increased operating costs, affect the demand for our products or affect the ability of our critical suppliers to meet our needs.
The Company has followed the current debate over climate change and the related policy discussion and prospective legislation. The potential challenges for the Company that climate change policy and legislation may pose have been reviewed by the Company. Any such challenges are heavily dependent on the nature and degree of climate change legislation and the extent to which it applies to our industry. At this time, the Company cannot predict the ultimate impact of climate change and climate change legislation on the Company’s operations. Further, when or if these impacts may occur cannot be assessed until scientific analysis and legislative policy are more developed and specific legislative proposals begin to take shape. Any laws or regulations that may be adopted to restrict or reduce emissions of greenhouse gas could require us to incur increased operating costs, and could have an adverse effect on demand for our products. In addition, the price and availability of certain of the raw materials that we use could vary in the future as a result of environmental laws and regulations affecting our suppliers. An increase in the price of our raw materials or a decline in their availability could adversely affect our operating margins or result in reduced demand for our products.
14
Our manufacturer’s warranties or product liability may expose us to potentially significant claims.
We warrant the workmanship and materials of many of our products. Accordingly, we are subject to a risk of product liability or warranty claims in the event that the failure of any of our products results in personal injury or death, or does not conform to our customers’ specifications. In addition, in recent years, we have introduced a number of new products for which we do not have the same level of historical warranty experience. Although we have not had any material product liability or warranty claims made against us and we currently maintain liability insurance coverage, we cannot assure that product liability claims, if made, would not exceed our insurance coverage limits or that insurance will continue to be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. The possibility exists for these types of warranty claims to result in costly product recalls, significant repair costs and damage to our reputation.
Labor disputes may have a material adverse effect on our operations and profitability.
We collectively bargain with labor unions that represent approximately 37% of our employees. Our current collective bargaining agreements generally extend through 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. Agreements expiring in 2010 cover approximately 21% of the Company’s workforce. Failure to reach an agreement could result in strikes or other labor protests which could disrupt our operations. If we were to experience a strike or work stoppage, it would be difficult for us to find a sufficient number of employees with the necessary skills to replace these employees. We cannot assure that we will reach any such agreement or that we will not encounter strikes or other types of conflicts with the labor unions of our personnel. Such labor disputes could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, could cause us to lose revenues and customers and might have permanent effects on our business.
From time to time we are engaged in contractual disputes with our customers.
From time to time, we are engaged in contractual disputes with our customers regarding routine delivery and performance issues as well as adjustments for design changes and related extra work. These disputes are generally resolved in the ordinary course of business without having a material adverse impact on us.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health.
At December 31, 2009, we had total debt of $391.8 million. If it becomes necessary to access our available borrowing capacity under the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement, along with carrying the $241.0 million currently borrowed under this facility and the $150.0 million 6.875% senior notes, being indebted could have important consequences to us. For example, it could:
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industries in which we operate;
place us at a disadvantage compared to competitors that have less debt; and
limit our ability to borrow additional funds.
The indenture for our $150 million 6.875% senior notes due in 2013 and our 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement contain various covenants that limit our Management’s discretion in the operation of our businesses.
The indenture governing the notes and our credit agreement contain various covenants that limit our Management’s discretion.
15
The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement limits the Company’s ability to declare or pay cash dividends and prohibits the Company from declaring or making other distributions, subject to certain exceptions. The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement contains various other covenants and restrictions including the following limitations: incurrence of additional indebtedness; mergers, consolidations and sales of assets and acquisitions; additional liens; sale and leasebacks; permissible investments, loans and advances; certain debt payments; capital expenditures; and imposes a minimum interest expense coverage ratio and a maximum debt to cash flow ratio.
The indenture under which the senior notes were issued contains covenants and restrictions which limit among other things, the following: the incurrence of indebtedness, payment of dividends and certain distributions, sale of assets, change in control, mergers and consolidations and the incurrence of liens.
The integration of our recently completed acquisitions may not result in anticipated improvements in market position or the realization of anticipated operating synergies or may take longer to realize than expected.
In 2008 and 2009, we completed the acquisition of Poli, SCT and Unifin for a combined $482.6 million, net of cash received. Although we believe that the acquisitions will improve our market position and realize positive operating results, including operating synergies, operating expense reductions and overhead cost savings, we cannot be assured that these improvements will be obtained. The management and acquisition of businesses involves substantial risks, any of which may result in a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, including:
the uncertainty that an acquired business will achieve anticipated operating results;
significant expenses to integrate;
diversion of Management’s attention;
departure of key personnel from the acquired business;
effectively managing entrepreneurial spirit and decision-making;
integration of different information systems;
unanticipated costs and exposure to unforeseen liabilities; and
impairment of assets.
None.
16
Facilities
The following table provides certain summary information about the principal facilities owned or leased by the Company. The Company believes that its facilities and equipment are generally in good condition and that, together with scheduled capital improvements, they are adequate for its present and immediately projected needs. Leases on the facilities are long-term and generally include options to renew. The Company’s corporate headquarters are located at the Wilmerding, PA site.
Location
Primary Use
Segment
Own/Lease
Domestic
Wilmerding, PA
Lexington, TN
Jackson, TN
Chicago, IL
Warren, OH
Greensburg, PA
Coshocton, OH
Germantown, MD
Salem, OH
Gibsonia, PA
Chillicothe, OH
Kansas City, MO
Strongsville, OH
Pittsburgh, PA
Bensenville, IL
Columbia, SC
Cedar Rapids, IA
St. Joseph, MI
Chesapeake, VA
Carson City, NV
Montgomery, IL
Park Ridge, IL
Oak Creek, WI
Twinsburg, OH
Azle, TX
Boise, ID
Maxton, NC
Willits, CA
Panorama City, CA
Spartanburg, SC
Buffalo Grove, IL
Plattsburgh, NY
Elmsford, NY
Green, SC
Elkhart, IN
Avondale, GA
San Pablo, CA
17
New Castle, DE
Baltimore, MD
Mountaintop, PA
International
Wallaceburg (Ontario), Canada
San Luis Potosi, Mexico
Skopje, Macedonia
Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, China
London (Ontario), Canada
Beijing, China
Stoney Creek (Ontario), Canada
Kolkata, India
Lachine (Quebec), Canada
Rydalmere, Australia
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Calgary (Alberta), Canada
Kutna Hora, Czech Republic
Kirkcaldy, UK
Nepean (Ontario), Canada
Doncaster, UK
Wetherill Park, Australia
Kempton Park, South Africa
Avellino, Italy
St. Laurent (Quebec), Canada
Recklinghausen, Germany
Camisano, Italy
Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Sassuolo, Italy
Droylsden, UK
Aachen, Germany
Munich, Germany
Vierzon, France
Milan, Italy
Derby, UK
Warsaw, Poland
Barcelona, Spain
Information with respect to legal proceedings is included in Note 19 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
18
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table provides information on our executive officers. They are elected periodically by our Board of Directors and serve at its discretion.
Officers
Age
Position
Albert J. Neupaver was named President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in February, 2006. Prior to joining Wabtec, Mr. Neupaver served in various positions at AMETEK, Inc., a leading global manufacturer of electronic instruments and electric motors. Most recently he served as President of its Electromechanical Group for nine years.
Alvaro Garcia-Tunon has been Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company since March 2003. Mr. Garcia-Tunon was Senior Vice President, Finance of the Company from November 1999 until March 2003 and Treasurer of the Company from August 1995 until November 1999.
Raymond T. Betlerhas been Vice President, Group Executive since August 2008. Prior to joining Wabtec, Mr. Betler served in various positions of increasing responsibility at Bombardier Transportation since 1979. Most recently, Mr. Betler served as President, Total Transit Systems from 2004 until 2008 and before that as President, London Underground Projects from 2002 to 2004.
R. Mark Cox was named Vice President, Corporate Development in September 2006. Prior to joining Wabtec, Mr. Cox served as Director of Business Development for the Electrical Group of Eaton Corporation since 2002. Prior to joining Eaton, Mr. Cox was an investment banker with UBS Warburg, Prudential and Stephens.
Patrick D. Dugan was named Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller in January 2007. He has served as Corporate Controller since November 2003. Prior to joining Wabtec, Mr. Dugan served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CWI International, Inc. from December 1996 to November 2003. Prior to 1996, Mr. Dugan was a Manager with PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Keith P. Hildum was named Vice President and Treasurer in October 2006. He had been serving as Treasurer of the Company since 2001, and prior to that was Vice President, Finance and Administration—Railroad Operations. He has been with Wabtec since 1999, having held various positions with MotivePower Industries. Prior to MotivePower, Mr. Hildum was a Senior Manager with Deloitte & Touche.
Charles F. Kovac was named Vice President, Group Executive in September 2007. Prior to joining Wabtec, Mr. Kovac served as General Manager of the Global Floor Care/Specialty Motors Division of AMETEK, Inc. since 2003. Prior to joining AMETEK, Inc., Mr. Kovac was Chief Operating Officer of The Teleios Group, LLC from 1999 to 2003.
Richard A. Mathes was named Vice President, Group Executive of Wabtec in December, 2008. Prior to joining Wabtec Mr. Mathes was CEO of SCT from 1995 to 2008, having rejoined SCT in 1989 as President. Mr. Mathes had previously been in sales and marketing with SCT from 1979 through 1984 before leaving to pursue other opportunities in the rail industry. He began his 36 year career in the transportation industry in 1972 with the Missouri Pacific Railroad in St. Louis, MO.
David M. Seitz was promoted to Vice President, Senior Counsel and Assistant Secretary in January 2008. He had served as Senior Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Wabtec since 2000 and was appointed as an executive officer in 2006. Prior to joining Wabtec, Mr. Seitz was General Attorney and Assistant Secretary at Transtar, Inc., and had also been an electrical engineer with Westinghouse Electric Company.
Scott E. Wahlstrom has been Vice President, Human Resources, since November 1999. Previously, Mr. Wahlstrom was Vice President, Human Resources & Administration of MotivePower Industries, Inc. from August 1996 until November 1999.
Timothy R. Wesley has been Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications since November 1999. Previously, Mr. Wesley was Vice President, Investor and Public Relations of MotivePower Industries, Inc. from August 1996 until November 1999.
PART II
The Common Stock of the Company is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. As of February 22, 2010, there were 47,619,699 shares of Common Stock outstanding held by 794 holders of record. The high and low sales price of the shares and dividends declared per share were as follows:
2009
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
2008
The Company’s credit agreement restricts the ability to make dividend payments, with certain exceptions. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and see Note 9 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
At the close of business on February 22, 2010, the Company’s Common Stock traded at $39.36 per share.
The following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference to any future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that Wabtec specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing. The graph below compares the total stockholder return through December 31, 2009, of Wabtec’s common stock, (i) the S&P 500,
20
(ii) and our peer group of manufacturing companies consisting of the following publicly traded companies: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc., L.B. Foster Company, Trinity Industries, Portec Rail Products, Inc. and Freight Car America, Inc.
On July 31, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million of the Company’s outstanding shares. On February 20, 2008 the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $100 million of the Company’s outstanding shares. The Company intends to purchase these shares on the open market or in negotiated or block trades. No time limit was set for the completion of the program. The program qualifies under the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement, as applicable, as well as the 6.875% Senior Notes currently outstanding.
During the first quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased 712,900 shares at an average price of $34.29 per share, exhausting the $50.0 million authorization made in 2006. During the second quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased 5,200 shares at an average price of $35.97 per share. No additional shares were repurchased during the third quarter of 2008. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased 599,800 shares at an average price of $35.22 per share. All purchases were on the open market.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company repurchased 290,000 shares at an average price of $25.08 per share. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company repurchased 379,700 shares at an average price of $32.61 per share. No additional shares were repurchased during the third and fourth quarters of 2009. All purchases were on the open market.
21
The following table shows selected consolidated financial information of the Company and has been derived from audited financial statements. This financial information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by reference to, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
In thousands, except per share amounts
Income Statement Data
Net sales
Gross profit
Operating expenses
Income from operations (1)
Interest expense, net
Other income (expense), net
Income from continuing operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of tax) (2)
Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders (3)
Diluted Earnings per Common Share
Cash dividends declared per share
Fully diluted shares outstanding
Balance Sheet Data
Total assets
Cash
Total debt
Shareholders’ equity
22
OVERVIEW
Wabtec is one of the world’s largest providers of value-added, technology-based products and services for the global rail industry. Our products are found on virtually all U.S. locomotives, freight cars and passenger transit vehicles, as well as in approximately 100 countries throughout the world. Our products enhance safety, improve productivity and reduce maintenance costs for customers, and many of our core products and services are essential in the safe and efficient operation of freight rail and passenger transit vehicles. Wabtec is a global company with operations in 17 countries. In 2009, about 40% of the Company’s revenues came from customers outside the U.S.
Management Review and Outlook
Wabtec’s long-term financial goals are to generate cash flow in excess of net income, maintain a strong credit profile while minimizing our overall cost of capital, increase margins through strict attention to cost controls, and increase revenues through a focused growth strategy, including global and market expansion, new products and technologies, aftermarket products and services, and acquisitions. In addition, Management evaluates the Company’s short-term operational performance through measures such as quality and on-time delivery.
The Company monitors a variety of factors and statistics to gauge market activity. The freight rail industry is largely driven by general economic conditions, which can cause fluctuations in rail traffic. Based on those fluctuations, railroads can increase or decrease purchases of new locomotives and freight cars. In 2009, the U.S. economy, in general, and the Company specifically were impacted by the global economic recession during the year. This was particularly true for the Company’s Freight Segment. In the U.S., for example, freight revenue ton-miles and carloadings were down 15.1% and 16.1%, respectively, although they did improve slightly in the second half of the year. With rail traffic down significantly, railroads put a portion of their locomotive and freight car fleets in storage, and reduced purchases of new equipment. As a result, 2009 deliveries of new freight locomotives decreased about 50% and deliveries of new freight cars decreased about 65%. Although less than 15% of the Company’s revenues are directly related to deliveries of new freight locomotives and freight cars, the decline in those markets had a material impact on the Company’s financial results. To mitigate this impact, Wabtec initiated a series of restructuring actions that included plant consolidations, a work force reduction and other cost reduction efforts.
The North American transit rail industry is driven by government spending and ridership. Spending increased about 6% in 2009, while ridership decreased about 4% due to the economy. In February 2009, the U.S. federal government passed new spending legislation designed to stimulate the U.S. economy. Of the $789 billion spending package, up to $20 billion is to be spent on freight and passenger transportation, as follows: $8.4 billion for public transportation, $8 billion for high-speed rail, $1.5 billion for discretionary intermodal projects, and $1.3 billion for AMTRAK. Wabtec expects to benefit from this additional spending, as transit authorities invest in expansion, new equipment and other related projects.
In 2010, the Company expects conditions to remain challenging in the freight rail market and generally stable in the passenger transit market. Demand for new freight cars and locomotives are expected to be lower, due to the railroads’ amount of surplus equipment. In the passenger transit market, the Company believes that increases in federal funding and stable ridership will continue to have a beneficial effect on the demand for new equipment and aftermarket parts. In response to current market conditions, Wabtec may continue to take certain actions to reduce costs, including plant consolidations, work force reductions and general spending cuts. Management believes these actions will not affect the company’s ability to continue to invest in its strategic growth initiatives.
23
In 2010 and beyond, unfavorable general economic and market conditions in the United States and internationally could have a negative impact on our sales and operations. To the extent that the economy is slow to recover and results in continued instability of capital markets, shortages of raw materials or component parts, longer sales cycles, deferral or delay of customer orders or an inability to market our products effectively, our business and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, we face risks associated with our four-point growth strategy include the level of investment that customers are willing to make in new technologies developed by the industry and the Company, and risks inherent in global expansion. When necessary, we will modify our financial and operating strategies to reflect changes in market conditions and risks.
Wabtec downsized its Canadian operations by moving certain products to lower-cost facilities and outsourcing. In the Freight segment, Wabtec recorded charges of 4.6 million and $3.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. No charges for these operations and this restructuring plan were recorded in the year ended December 31, 2009. For these operations cumulative expenses for restructuring and other expenses recorded since 2006 have been $16.5 million, comprised of the $5.7 million for employee severance costs for approximately 400 employees; $5.5 million of pension and postretirement benefit curtailment for those employees; and $5.3 million related to fixed asset and goodwill impairment. Goodwill impairment was recorded as amortization expense and most of the other charges were recorded in cost of sales. Severance costs are contractual liabilities and payment is dependent on the waiver by or expiration of certain seniority rights of those employees. As of December 31, 2009, $4.2 million of this amount had been paid.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table shows our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years indicated.
In millions
Cost of sales
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Engineering expenses
Amortization expense
Total operating expenses
Income from operations
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
Income tax expense
Discontinued operations (net of tax)
Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders
24
2009 COMPARED TO 2008
The following table summarizes the results of operations for the period:
Net sales decreased by $173.2 million to $1,401.6 million in 2009 from $1,574.8 million in 2008. The decrease is due to the recession experienced during the previous twelve months, which contributed to lower rail traffic and lower Freight Group sales. Sales related to acquisitions of $114.9 million, partially offset the decrease. The Company realized a net sales reduction of $35.1 million due to unfavorable effects of foreign exchange, but net earnings were generally not impacted by foreign exchange.
Net income for 2009 was $115.1 million or $2.39 per diluted share. Net income for 2008 was $130.6 million or $2.66 per diluted share. Net income decreased due to lower Freight Group sales, severance and other costs related to downsizing and consolidation actions, partially offset by cost-saving initiatives and lower income taxes. Net income was also decreased by the $3.9 million royalty charge, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, related to the Final Award in the arbitration proceeding between Faiveley Transport Malmo AB and Wabtec.
Net sales by Segment The following table shows the Company’s net sales by business segment:
Freight Group sales decreased by $185.2 million or 23.9% due to lower sales of $145.7 million for specialty products, $107.3 million for brake products and $21.5 million for remanufacturing, overhaul and manufacturing of locomotives. Offsetting those reductions was an increase in sales of $103.1 million from acquisitions. Transit Group sales increased by $12.0 million or 1.5% due to
increased sales of $17.1 million for brake products, $25.0 million for other transit related products and $11.8 million from acquisitions. Offsetting those increases was a decrease in sales of $10.0 million for remanufacturing, overhaul and build of locomotives. For the Transit Group, net sales were reduced by $30.9 million due to unfavorable effects of foreign exchange on sales mentioned above.
Gross profit Gross profit decreased to $393.3 million in 2009 compared to $427.2 million in 2008. Gross profit is dependent on a number of factors including pricing, sales volume and product mix. In 2009, gross profit, as a percentage of sales, was 28.1% compared to 27.1% in 2008. The gross profit percentage increased due to realized cost savings from downsizing and consolidation actions and increased gross profit in the transit segment due to efficiencies realized on certain long-term contracts. The provision for warranty expense is generally established for specific losses, along with historical estimates of customer claims as a percentage of sales. The provision for warranty expense was $3.4 more in 2009 compared to 2008 due primarily to specific reserves on certain transit products. The warranty reserve decreased at December 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 by $1.5 million due to claims paid on certain freight products.
25
Operating expenses The following table shows our operating expenses:
Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased $9.6 million in 2009 compared to 2008 due to cost-saving initiatives, partially offset by increased expenses from acquisitions. Engineering expenses increased by $3.4 million in 2009 compared to 2008 due to acquisitions, offset partially by cost-saving initiatives. Amortization expense increased $4.8 million due to acquisitions. During 2009, the Company sold a facility for net cash proceeds of $3.6 million to an unrelated third party. While certain portions of the building are being leased back, this transaction resulted in a gain of $2.1 million and deferred gain of $0.6 million. The deferred gain will be recognized over five years. Total operating expenses were 15.2% and 13.6% of sales for 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Income from operations Income from operations totaled $180.0 million (or 12.8% of sales) in 2009 compared to $212.5 million (or 13.5% of sales) in 2008. Income from operations decreased due to lower Freight Group sales, severance and other costs related to downsizing and consolidation actions and the royalty payment to Faiveley Transport Malmo AB, partially offset by cost-saving initiatives.
Interest expense, net Interest expense, net increased $8.1 million in 2009 compared to 2008 due to acquisition financing.
Other expense, net Other expense, net decreased $0.3 million in 2009 compared to 2008. The Company recorded foreign exchange expense of $1.3 million due to the effect of currency exchange rate changes on intercompany transactions that are non U.S. dollar denominated amounts and charged or credited to earnings. This was offset by $1.0 million of other miscellaneous income.
Income taxes The effective income tax rate was 29.6% and 36.1% in 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the settlement of examinations in various taxing jurisdictions during 2009.
Net income Net income for 2009 decreased $15.5 million, compared to 2008. The decrease in net income is due primarily to lower sales.
2008 COMPARED TO 2007
Net sales increased by $214.7 million to $1,574.8 million in 2008 from $1,360.1 million in 2007. The increase is due to internal growth from increased sales of $55.3 million for brake products, $36.8 million for
26
contracts related to transit authorities, $21.8 million in remanufacturing, overhaul and build of locomotives, and $16.6 million for heat exchangers. Sales related to acquisitions also contributed $59.3 million to the increase. Sales related to international expansion also contributed $18 million to the increase. Offsetting these increases, the Company did realize a net sales decrease of $12.2 million due to foreign exchange but net earnings are mostly not impacted by foreign exchange.
Net income for 2008 was $130.6 million or $2.66 per diluted share. Net income for 2007 was $109.6 million or $2.24 per diluted share. Net income improved primarily due to sales increases.
Freight Group sales increased by $39.4 million or 5.4% due to increased sales from international expansion of $18 million, increased sales from heat exchangers of $16.6 million, sales of $11.2 million for aftermarket brake products, and sales of $11.1 million from an acquisition completed in the fourth quarter of 2008. Offsetting these increases were decreases of $20.9 million in locomotive component, repair and refurbishment services. Transit Group sales increased by $175.3 million or 28% due to increased sales of brake products of $52.1 million, contracts related to transit authorities of $37.6 million, increased sales of $21.8 million related to refurbishment of transit cars, and sales of $48 million for the full year results from acquisitions completed in 2007 and the acquisitions completed in the second quarter of 2008.
Gross profit Gross profit increased to $427.2 million in 2008 compared to $369.6 million in 2007. Gross profit is dependent on a number of factors including pricing, sales volume and product mix. In 2008, gross profit, as a percentage of sales, was 27.1% compared to 27.2% in 2007. The gross profit percentage was flat due to the changing mix of revenues from Freight to Transit as Transit margins tend to be lower than Freight. This was offset by ongoing efficiency and cost saving initiatives. The provision for warranty expense is generally established for specific losses, along with historical estimates of customer claims as a percentage of sales. The provision for warranty expense was $10.7 more in 2008 compared to 2007 because of increased sales, particularly for large transit authority contracts which ramped up in 2008. The warranty reserve increased at December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007 by $8.4 million due to $4 million from acquisitions completed in 2008, and primarily from customer claims or transit authority contracts.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased $22.2 million in 2008 compared to 2007 mostly due to the acquisitions that were completed during the fourth quarter of 2008. Engineering expenses increased by $1.5 million in 2008 compared to 2007 mostly due to those same acquisitions. Amortization expense increased $1.0 million due to acquisitions. Total operating expenses were 13.6% and 14.0% of sales for 2008 and 2007, respectively.
27
Income from operations Income from operations totaled $212.5 million (or 13.5% of sales) in 2008 compared to $179.7 million (or 13.2% of sales) in 2007. Income from operations improved primarily due to sales increases.
Interest expense, net Interest expense, net increased $4.9 million in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily due to the Company’s overall lower cash balances, resulting in lower interest income, and acquisition financing incurred in the fourth quarter in connection with the acquisition of Standard Car Truck.
Other expense, net Other expense, net decreased $3.9 million in 2008 compared to 2007. The Company recorded foreign exchange expense of $399,000 and $3.2 million, respectively, in 2008 and 2007, due to the effect of currency exchange rate changes on intercompany transactions that are non U.S. dollar denominated amounts and charged or credited to earnings.
Income taxes The effective income tax rate was 36.1% and 36.6% in 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily the result of a $1.0 million net tax benefit recognized in 2008 due to the expiration of statutory review periods and current examinations in various tax jurisdictions.
Net income Net income for 2008 increased $21.0 million, compared to 2007. Net income improved primarily due to sales increases.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is provided by operating cash flow and borrowings under the Company’s unsecured credit facility with a consortium of commercial banks. The following is a summary of selected cash flow information and other relevant data:
Cash provided by (used for):
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities:
Proceeds from debt
Payments of debt
Stock repurchase
Cash dividends
Other
Operating activities. Cash provided by operations in 2009 was $160.5 million as compared to $159.4 million in 2008. This $1.1 million increase in cash provided by operations resulted from a net decrease in working capital, offset by lower net income. The decrease in accounts receivables resulted in an improvement of $101.4 million. The decrease in inventories resulted in an improvement of $76.1 million. Accounts payable used cash of $62.5 million due to a reduction in purchasing. These changes were the result of overall reduced volume of sales. Accrued liabilities and customer deposits used cash of $87.7 million due to a reduction in customer deposits on contracts. Other assets and liabilities, including accrued income taxes, used cash of $6.4 million. Net income for the Company decreased $15.5 million primarily as a result of decreased sales, due to the economic recession.
Cash provided by operations in 2008 was $159.4 million as compared to $142.5 million in 2007. This $16.9 million increase was the result of increased earnings offset by certain changes in operating assets and liabilities. Net income for the Company increased $21.0 million primarily as a result of increased sales. Although account
28
receivable continued to increase due to higher overall sales, the increase was less than the increase in 2007 which resulted in a $10.8 million improvement. Inventories increased in 2008 about $28.4 million more than 2007 due to higher inventory on hand for large contracts requirements and overall higher sales activity. Accounts payable increased less in 2008 compared to 2007 by $18.4 million resulting in less cash generated. Customer deposits and other accruals increased compared to 2007 resulting in a cash increase of $35.8 million. Cash was generated due to the collection of large customer deposits on certain long term contracts. Other assets and liabilities, including accrued income taxes, used cash of $9.1 million compared to 2007.
Investing activities. In 2009 and 2008, cash used in investing activities was $115.2 million and $417.4 million, respectively. In 2009, Wabtec acquired Unifin International LP, and its affiliate, Cardinal Pumps and Exchangers, Inc. for $92.9 million, net of cash received. During 2009 the Company also paid $4.7 million as part of the working capital settlement for the Poli acquisition and $3.4 million to acquire certain other assets. In 2009, the Company sold a facility for net cash proceeds of $3.6 million to an unrelated third party. In 2008, Wabtec acquired 100% of the stock of Poli SpA and Standard Car Truck for $82.3 million and $302.9 million, respectively, net of cash received. Other investments include $8.4 million for certain operations in China, and $4.5 million for certain assets to support our train management business. In 2007, Wabtec acquired 100% of the stock of Ricon Corporation for $73.6 million, net of cash received. Capital expenditures were $18.3 million, $19.7 million, and $19.7 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Financing activities. In 2009, cash used for financing activities was $13.0 million, which included $197.5 million in proceeds from debt and $162.5 million of repayments of debt on the revolving credit facility, $30.8 million of debt repayments on the term loan and other debt, $1.9 million of dividend payments and $19.7 million of Wabtec stock repurchases. In 2008, cash provided by financing activities was $189.7 million, which included $236.0 million of borrowings under the new credit facility, offset by $45.8 million of Wabtec stock repurchases.
The following table shows outstanding indebtedness at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
6.875% senior notes, due 2013
Term Loan Facility
Revolving Credit Facility
Capital Leases
Less—current portion
Long-term portion
Cash balance at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $188.7 million and $141.8 million, respectively.
2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement
On November 4, 2008, the Company refinanced its existing unsecured revolving credit agreement with a consortium of commercial banks. This “2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement” provides the company with a $300 million five-year revolving credit facility and a $200 million five-year term loan facility. The Company incurred $2.9 million of deferred financing cost related to the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement. Both facilities expire in January 2013. The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement borrowings bear variable interest rates indexed to the indices described below. At December 31, 2009 the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s variable rate debt was 1.49%. At December 31, 2009, the Company had available bank borrowing capacity, net of $28.6 million of letters of credit, of approximately $200.4 million, subject to certain financial covenant restrictions.
Under the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement, the Company may elect a Base Rate of interest or an interest rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) of interest (“the Alternate Rate”). The Base Rate
29
adjusts on a daily basis and is the greater of the PNC, N.A. prime rate, 30-day LIBOR plus 150 basis points or the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% per annum, plus a margin that ranges from 25 to 50 basis points. The Alternate rate is based on quoted LIBOR rates plus a margin that ranges from 125 to 200 basis points. Both the Base Rate and Alternate Rate margins are dependent on the Company’s consolidated total indebtedness to cash flow ratios. The Base Rate margin is zero basis points and the initial Alternate Rate margin is 125 basis points. To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on a portion of this variable-rate debt, the Company entered into an interest rate swap which effectively converted a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowing during the term of the swap contract. On December 31, 2009, the notional value of the interest rate swap outstanding was $92.5 million and effectively changed the Company’s interest rate on bank debt at December 31, 2009 from a variable rate to a fixed rate of 1.84%. The interest rate swap agreement matures in January 2010. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty. However, since only the cash interest payments are exchanged, exposure is significantly less than the notional amount. The counterparty is a large financial institution and the Company does not anticipate nonperformance.
The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement limits the Company’s ability to declare or pay cash dividends and prohibits the Company from declaring or making other distributions, subject to certain exceptions. The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement contains various other covenants and restrictions including the following limitations: incurrence of additional indebtedness; mergers, consolidations, sales of assets and acquisitions; additional liens; sale and leasebacks; permissible investments, loans and advances; certain debt payments; and imposes a minimum interest expense coverage ratio of 3.0 and a maximum debt to cash flow ratio of 3.25. The Company is in compliance with these measurements and covenants and expects that these measurements will not be any type of limiting factor in executing our operating activities. See Note 9 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
6.875% Senior Notes Due August 2013. In August 2003, the Company issued $150 million of Senior Notes due in 2013 (“the Notes”). The Notes were issued at par. Interest on the Notes accrues at a rate of 6.875% per annum and is payable semi-annually on January 31 and July 31 of each year. The proceeds were used to repay debt outstanding under the Company’s existing credit agreement, and for general corporate purposes. The principal balance is due in full at maturity.
The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu with all existing and future senior debt and senior to all our existing and future subordinated indebtedness of the Company. The indenture under which the Notes were issued contains covenants and restrictions which limit among other things, the following: the incurrence of indebtedness, payment of dividends and certain distributions, sale of assets, change in control, mergers and consolidations and the incurrence of liens. The Company is in compliance with these measurements and covenants and expects that these measurements will not be any type of limiting factor in executing our operating activities.
Management believes that based on current levels of operations and forecasted earnings, cash flow and liquidity will be sufficient to fund working capital and capital equipment needs as well as meeting debt service requirements. If sources of funds were to fail to satisfy the Company’s cash requirements, the Company may need to refinance our existing debt or obtain additional financing. There is no assurance that such new financing alternatives would be available, and, in any case, such new financing, if available, would be expected to be more costly and burdensome than the debt agreements currently in place.
30
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company is obligated to make future payments under various contracts such as debt agreements, lease agreements and have certain contingent commitments such as debt guarantees. The Company has grouped these contractual obligations and off-balance sheet arrangements into operating activities, financing activities, and investing activities in the same manner as they are classified in the Statement of Consolidated Cash Flows to provide a better understanding of the nature of the obligations and arrangements and to provide a basis for comparison to historical information. The table below provides a summary of contractual obligations and off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2009:
Operating activities:
Purchase obligations (1)
Operating leases (2)
Pension benefit payments (3)
Postretirement benefit payments (4)
Interest payments (5)
Long-term debt (6)
Dividends to shareholders (7)
Investing activities:
Capital projects (8)
Other:
Standby letters of credit (9)
31
The above table does not reflect uncertain tax positions of $10.0 million, the timing of which are uncertain except for $589,000 that may become payable during 2010. Refer to Note 11 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information on uncertain tax positions.
Obligations for operating activities. The Company has entered into $36.6 million of material long-term non-cancelable materials and supply purchase obligations. Operating leases represent multi-year obligations for rental of facilities and equipment. Estimated pension funding and post retirement benefit payments are based on actuarial estimates using current assumptions for discount rates, expected return on long-term assets, rate of compensation increases and health care cost trend rates. Benefits paid for pension obligations were $16.0 million and $14.8 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. Benefits paid for post retirement plans were $1.9 million and $2.0 million in 2009 and in 2008, respectively.
Obligations for financing activities. Cash requirements for financing activities consist primarily of long-term debt repayments, interest payments and dividend payments to shareholders. The Company has historically paid quarterly dividends to shareholders, subject to quarterly approval by our Board of Directors, currently at a rate of approximately $1.9 million annually.
The Company arranges for performance bonds to be issued by third party insurance companies to support certain long term customer contracts. At December 31, 2009 initial value of performance bonds issued on the Company’s behalf is about $153.9 million.
Obligations for investing activities. The Company typically spends approximately $20 million to $30 million a year for capital expenditures, primarily related to facility expansion efficiency and modernization, health and safety, and environmental control. The Company expects annual capital expenditures in the future will be within this range.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For information regarding the impact of certain recent accounting pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements, see Note 2 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
Forward Looking Statements
We believe that all statements other than statements of historical facts included in this report, including certain statements under “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” may constitute forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. Although we believe that our assumptions made in connection with the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure that our assumptions and expectations are correct.
These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us, including, among other things:
Economic and industry conditions
prolonged unfavorable economic and industry conditions in the markets served by us, including North America, South America, Europe, Australia, Asia, and South Africa;
further decline in demand for freight cars, locomotives, passenger transit cars, buses and related products and services;
reliance on major original equipment manufacturer customers;
32
original equipment manufacturers’ program delays;
demand for services in the freight and passenger rail industry;
demand for our products and services;
orders either being delayed, cancelled, not returning to historical levels, or reduced or any combination of the foregoing;
consolidations in the rail industry;
continued outsourcing by our customers; industry demand for faster and more efficient braking equipment;
fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates; or
availability of credit;
Operating factors
supply disruptions;
technical difficulties;
changes in operating conditions and costs;
increases in raw material costs;
successful introduction of new products;
performance under material long-term contracts;
labor relations;
completion and integration of acquisitions; or
the development and use of new technology;
Competitive factors
the actions of competitors;
Political/governmental factors
political stability in relevant areas of the world;
future regulation/deregulation of our customers and/or the rail industry;
levels of governmental funding on transit projects, including for some of our customers;
political developments and laws and regulations;
federal and state income tax legislation; or
the outcome of our existing or any future legal proceedings, including litigation involving our principal customers and any litigation with respect to environmental, asbestos-related matters and pension liabilities; and
Transaction or commercial factors
the outcome of negotiations with partners, governments, suppliers, customers or others.
33
Statements in this 10-K apply only as of the date on which such statements are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires Management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Areas of uncertainty that require judgments, estimates and assumptions include the accounting for derivatives, environmental matters, warranty reserves, the testing of goodwill and other intangibles for impairment, proceeds on assets to be sold, pensions and other postretirement benefits, and tax matters. Management uses historical experience and all available information to make these judgments and estimates, and actual results will inevitably differ from those estimates and assumptions that are used to prepare the Company’s financial statements at any given time. Despite these inherent limitations, Management believes that Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) and the financial statements and related footnotes provide a meaningful and fair perspective of the Company. A discussion of the judgments and uncertainties associated with accounting for derivatives and environmental matters can be found in Notes 2 and 19, respectively, in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in Note 2 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables the Company to provide the users of the financial statements with useful and reliable information about the Company’s operating results and financial condition.
Description
Judgments and Uncertainties
Effect if Actual Results Differ FromAssumptions
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts to cover anticipated losses on uncollectible accounts receivable.
Inventories:
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.
34
Inventory is reviewed to ensure that an adequate provision is recognized for excess, slow moving and obsolete inventories.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangibles:
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles are required to be tested for impairment at least annually. The Company performs its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter and more frequently when indicators of impairment are present. The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. The Company’s reporting units are the same as its reportable segments. The evaluation of impairment involves comparing the current fair value of the business to the recorded value (including goodwill).
Management considers historical experience and all available information at the time the fair values of its business are estimated. However, actual amounts realized may differ from those used to evaluate the impairment of goodwill.
If actual results are not consistent with our assumptions and judgments used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values, we may be exposed to additional impairment losses that could be material to our results of operations.
Warranty Reserves:
The Company provides warranty reserves to cover expected costs from repairing or replacing products with durability, quality or workmanship issues occurring during established warranty periods.
35
Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits:
These amounts are determined using actuarial methodologies and incorporate significant assumptions, including the rate used to discount the future estimated liability, the long-term rate of return on plan assets and several assumptions relating to the employee workforce (salary increases, medical costs, retirement age and mortality).
Significant judgments and estimates are used in determining the liabilities and expenses for pensions and other postretirement benefits.
The rate used to discount future estimated liabilities is determined considering the rates available at year-end on debt instruments that could be used to settle the obligations of the plan. The long-term rate of return is estimated by considering historical returns and expected returns on current and projected asset allocations and is generally applied to a five-year average market value of assets.
Income Taxes:
Wabtec records an estimated liability or benefit for income and other taxes based on what it determines will likely be paid in various tax jurisdictions in which it operates in accordance with ASC 740-10 Accounting for Income Taxes and Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
The estimate of our tax obligations are uncertain because Management must use judgment to estimate the exposures associated with our various filing positions, as well as realization of our deferred tax assets.
ASC 740-10 establishes a recognition and measurement threshold to determine the amount of tax benefit that should be recognized related to uncertain tax positions.
Management uses its best judgment in the determination of these amounts. However, the liabilities ultimately realized and paid are dependent on various matters including the resolution of the tax audits in the various affected tax jurisdictions and may differ from the amounts recorded.
An adjustment to the estimated liability would be recorded through income in the period in which it becomes probable that the amount of the actual liability differs from the recorded amount.
A deferred tax valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Revenue Recognition:
Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC-605 “Revenue Recognition.”
36
The Company recognizes revenues on long-term contracts based on the percentage of completion method of accounting. The units-of-delivery method or other input-based or output-based measures, as appropriate, are used to measure the progress toward completion of individual contracts. Contract revenues and cost estimates are reviewed and revised at a minimum quarterly and adjustments are reflected in the accounting period as such amounts are determined.
Certain pre-production costs relating to long term production and supply contracts have been deferred and will be recognized over the life of the contracts.
Interest Rate Risk
In the ordinary course of business, Wabtec is exposed to risks that increases in interest rates may adversely affect funding costs associated with its variable-rate debt. The Company’s variable rate debt represents 38% and 61% of total long-term debt at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. On an annual basis a 1% change in the interest rate for variable rate debt at December 31, 2009 would increase or decrease interest expense by $1.5 million.
To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on a portion of this variable-rate debt, the Company entered into an interest rate swap which effectively converted a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowing during the term of the swap contract. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty. However, since only the cash interest payments are exchanged, exposure is significantly less than the notional amount. The counterparty is a large financial institution and the Company does not anticipate nonperformance. The Company concluded that the interest rate swap agreement qualifies for special cash flow hedge accounting which permits the recording of the fair value of the interest rate swap agreement and corresponding adjustment to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $92.5 million and which effectively changed the Company’s interest rate on bank debt at December 31, 2009 from a variable rate to a fixed rate of 1.84%. The interest rate swap agreement matures in January 2010. As of December 31, 2009, the Company recorded a current liability of $63,000 and a corresponding offset in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $38,000, net of tax.
37
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
The Company has entered into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the impact of changes in currency exchange rates. Forward contracts are agreements with a counterparty to exchange two distinct currencies at a set exchange rate for delivery on a set date at some point in the future. There is no exchange of funds until the delivery date. At the delivery date the Company can either take delivery of the currency or settle on a net basis.
We occasionally enter into several types of financial instruments for the purpose of managing our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in countries in which we have significant operations. As of December 31, 2009, we had several such instruments outstanding to hedge currency rate fluctuation in 2010.
At December 31, 2009, the Company had forward contracts for the sale of South African Rand (ZAR) and the purchase of U.S. Dollars (USD). The Company concluded that these foreign currency forward contracts qualify for cash flow hedge accounting which permits the recording of the fair value of the forward contract and corresponding adjustment to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had forward contracts with a notional value of $10.1 million ZAR (or $1.2 million U.S.) with an average exchange rate of $8.21 ZAR per $1 USD, resulting in the recording of a current liability of $110,000 and a corresponding offset in accumulated other comprehensive income of $70,000, net of tax.
At December 31, 2008, the Company had forward contracts for the sale of South African Rand (ZAR) and the purchase of U.S. Dollars (USD). The Company concluded that these foreign currency forward contracts qualify for cash flow hedge accounting which permits the recording of the fair value of the forward contract and corresponding adjustment to other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, on the balance sheet. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had forward contracts with a notional value of $5.0 million ZAR (or $557,000 U.S.) with an average exchange rate of $8.97 ZAR per $1 USD, resulting in the recording of a current asset of $41,000 and a corresponding offset in accumulated other comprehensive income of $26,000, net of tax.
We are also subject to certain risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates to the extent our operations are conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. For the year ended December 31, 2009, approximately 60% of Wabtec’s net sales were to the United States, 10% to Canada, 2% to Mexico, 4% to Australia, 2% to Germany, 10% to the United Kingdom, and 12% in other international locations. (See Note 20 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report).
Our market risk exposure is not substantially different from our exposure at December 31, 2008.
Financial statements and supplementary data are set forth in Item 15, of Part IV hereof.
There have been no disagreements with our independent public accountants.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Wabtec’s principal executive officer and its principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of Wabtec’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of December 31, 2009. Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that
38
Wabtec’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by Wabtec in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by Wabtec in such reports is accumulated and communicated to Wabtec’s Management, including its principal executive officer and principal finance officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in Wabtec’s “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Wabtec’s internal control over financial reporting. Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting and the attestation report of the registered public accounting firm are included in Part IV, Item 15 of this report.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appears on page 44 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Ernst & Young’s attestation report on internal control over financial reporting appears on page 46 and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART III
Items 10 through 14.
In accordance with the provisions of General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the information required by Item 10 (Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance), Item 11 (Executive Compensation), Item 12 (Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters), Item 13 (Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence) and Item 14 (Principal Accounting Fees and Services) is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 12, 2010, except for the Equity Compensation Plan Information required by Item 12, which is set forth in the table below. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days after December 31, 2009. Information relating to the executive officers of the Company is set forth in Part I.
Wabtec has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Officers which is applicable to all of our executive officers. As described in Item 1 of this report the Code of Ethics for Senior Officers is posted on our website at www.wabtec.com. In the event that we make any amendments to or waivers from this code, we will disclose the amendment or waiver and the reasons for such on our website.
This table provides aggregate information as of December 31, 2009 concerning equity awards under Wabtec’s compensation plans and arrangements.
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders
40
PART IV
The financial statements, financial statement schedules and exhibits listed below are filed as part of this annual report:
(a)
Management’s Reports to Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation Shareholders
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
49
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
89
FilingMethod
41
42
43
MANAGEMENT’S REPORTS TO WABTEC SHAREHOLDERS
Management’s Report on Financial Statements and Practices
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) were prepared by Management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. The statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and include amounts that are based on Management’s best judgments and estimates. The other financial information included in the 10-K is consistent with that in the financial statements.
Management also recognizes its responsibility for conducting the Company’s affairs according to the highest standards of personal and corporate conduct. This responsibility is characterized and reflected in key policy statements issued from time to time regarding, among other things, conduct of its business activities within the laws of host countries in which the Company operates and potentially conflicting outside business interests of its employees. The Company maintains a systematic program to assess compliance with these policies.
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, Management has conducted an assessment, including testing, using the criteria in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management has excluded Unifin International LP, and its affiliate, Cardinal Pumps and Exchangers, Inc. (Unifin) from its assessment of internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 because Unifin was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination effective October 1, 2009. Unifin is a wholly owned subsidiaries whose total assets represents 12.4% and net income represents 0.8%, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Based on its assessment, Management has concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein.
44
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s Management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by Management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
As explained in Note 11 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”, for the year ended December 31, 2007 the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”, subsequently codified in Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” of the Accounting Standards Codification. As explained in Note 2 in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”, for the year ended December 31, 2009 the Company adopted the December 2007 amendment to Accounting Standard Codification Topic 810, “Consolidation.”
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 24, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
February 24, 2010
45
We have audited Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Unifin International LP, and its affiliate, Cardinal Pumps and Exchangers, Inc. (Unifin), which is included in the 2009 consolidated financial statements of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and constituted 12.4% of total assets as of December 31, 2009, and 0.8% of net income for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Unifin.
In our opinion, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation and our report dated February 24, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
46
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
In thousands, except share and par value
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable
Inventories
Deferred income taxes
Total current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Accumulated depreciation
Property, plant and equipment, net
Other Assets
Goodwill
Other intangibles, net
Other noncurrent assets
Total other assets
Total Assets
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable
Customer deposits
Accrued compensation
Accrued warranty
Current portion of long-term debt
Commitments and contingencies
Other accrued liabilities
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt
Reserve for postretirement and pension benefits
Other long-term liabilities
Total liabilities
Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, 1,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued
Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized: 66,174,767 shares issued and 47,688,695 and 47,907,357 outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively
Additional paid-in capital
Treasury stock, at cost, 18,486,072 and 18,267,410 shares, at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation shareholders’ equity
Non-controlling interest
Total shareholders’ equity
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
47
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
In thousands, except per share data
Other income and expenses
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (net of tax)
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
Diluted
Weighted average shares outstanding
48
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Operating Activities
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization
Stock-based compensation expense
(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Excess income tax benefits from exercise of stock options
Discontinued operations
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions
Accrued income taxes
Accrued liabilities and customer deposits
Other assets and liabilities
Net cash provided by operating activities
Investing Activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired
Acquisition purchase price adjustments
Net cash used for investing activities
Financing Activities
Debt financing costs
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and other benefit plans
Cash dividends ($0.04 per share for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007)
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities
Effect of changes in currency exchange rates
Increase/(decrease) in cash
Cash, beginning of year
Cash, end of year
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
In thousands, except share and per share data
Balance, December 31, 2006
Adjustment to Beginning Retained Earnings due to adoption of FIN 48
Cash dividends ($0.04 dividend per share)
Proceeds from treasury stock issued from the exercise of stock options and other benefit plans, net of tax
Stock-based Compensation
Net income
Translation adjustment
Unrealized gains on foreign exchange contracts, net of $475 tax
Change in pension and post retirement benefit plans, net of $7,008 tax
Stock Repurchase
Total comprehensive income
Balance, December 31, 2007
Adjustment to Beginning Retained Earnings due to adoption of FAS 158
Unrealized gains on foreign exchange contracts, net of $15 tax
Change in pension and post retirement benefit plans, net of $4,493 tax
Balance, December 31, 2008
Unrealized (loss) on foreign exchange contracts, net of $55 tax
Unrealized (loss) on interest rate swap contracts, net of $25 tax
Change in pension and post retirement benefit plans, net of $2,583 tax
Balance, December 31, 2009
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements
50
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority owned subsidiaries. Such statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Sales between subsidiaries are billed at prices consistent with sales to third parties and are eliminated in consolidation.
Subsequent Events In preparing the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements, the Company has reviewed, as determined necessary by the Company’s management, events that have occurred after December 31, 2009 until February 24, 2010, the issuance date of the financial statements.
Accounting Standards Codification The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) became effective on July 1, 2009. At that date, the ASC became FASB’s officially recognized source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities, superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) and related literature. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. The switch to the ASC affects the way companies refer to U.S. GAAP in financial statements and accounting policies. Citing particular content in the ASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure.
Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The allowance for doubtful accounts receivable reflects our best estimate of probable losses inherent in our receivable portfolio determined on the basis of historical experience, specific allowances for known troubled accounts and other currently available evidence. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $7.3 million and $5.0 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Inventory costs include material, labor and overhead.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant and equipment additions are stated at cost. Expenditures for renewals and improvements are capitalized. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. The Company provides for book depreciation principally on the straight-line method. Accelerated depreciation methods are utilized for income tax purposes.
Leasing Arrangements The Company conducts a portion of its operations from leased facilities and finances certain equipment purchases through lease agreements. In those cases in which the lease term approximates the useful life of the leased asset or the lease meets certain other prerequisites, the leasing arrangement is classified as a capital lease. The remaining arrangements are treated as operating leases.
51
Intangible Assets Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Other intangibles (with definite lives) are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives. Amortizable intangible assets are reviewed for impairment when indicators of impairment are present. The Company tests goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually. The Company performs its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter after the annual forecasting process is completed, and is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Periodically, Management of the Company assesses whether or not an indicator of impairment is present that would necessitate a goodwill impairment analysis be performed.
The goodwill impairment analysis is performed by comparing the carrying amount of the reporting unit to its estimated fair value and to the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, the reporting unit’s carrying value of goodwill is compared to the implied fair value of goodwill. To the extent that the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, impairment exists and must be recognized.
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. The Company’s reporting units are the same as its reportable segments. The Company prepares its goodwill impairment analysis by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit, using an income approach (a discounted cash flow model) as well as a market approach, with its carrying value. The income approach and the market approach are equally weighted in arriving at fair value, which the Company has applied consistently.
The discounted cash flow model requires several assumptions including future sales growth, EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) margins and capital expenditures for the reporting units. The discounted cash flow model also requires the use of a discount rate and a terminal revenue growth rate (the revenue growth rate for the period beyond the three years forecasted by the reporting units), as well as projections of future operating margins. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company used a discount rate for each of its reporting units ranging from 14% to 20% and a terminal revenue growth rate of 3%. The difference in the discount rates is based on the underlying markets and risks associated with each of the Company’s reporting units.
The market approach requires several assumptions including EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) multiples for comparable companies that operate in the same markets as the Company’s reporting units. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company used EBITDA multiples for its reporting units ranging from 6.5 to 7.5. The difference in the EBITDA multiples is due to the underlying markets associated with each of the Company’s reporting units.
The fair value of the Freight and Transit segments exceeded the carrying value of each reporting unit by more than 10%.
Warranty Costs Warranty costs are accrued based on Management’s estimates of repair or upgrade costs per unit and historical experience. Warranty expense was $20.4 million, $17.1 million and $10.4 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Warranty reserves were $29.2 million and $30.7 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws. The provision for income taxes includes federal, state and foreign income taxes.
Stock-Based Compensation The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock-based compensation based on the grant date fair value. This expense must be recognized ratably over the requisite service period following the date of grant.
52
Financial Derivatives and Hedging Activities The Company has entered into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the impact of changes in currency exchange rates. Forward contracts are agreements with a counterparty to exchange two distinct currencies at a set exchange rate for delivery on a set date at some point in the future. There is no exchange of funds until the delivery date. At the delivery date the Company can either take delivery of the currency or settle on a net basis.
Foreign Currency Translation Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, except for the Company’s Mexican operations whose functional currency is the U.S. Dollar, are translated at the rate of exchange in effect on the balance sheet date while income and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from transactions, and the translation of financial statements are recorded in the Company’s consolidated financial statements based upon the provisions of ASC 830, “Foreign Currency Matters.” The effects of currency exchange rate changes on intercompany transactions and balances of a long-term investment nature are accumulated and carried as a component of shareholders’ equity. The effects of currency exchange rate changes on intercompany transactions that are denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency are charged or credited to earnings. Foreign exchange transaction losses recognized in other (expense) income, net were $1.3 million, $0.4 million and $3.2 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Noncontrolling Interests On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the amendment under ASC 810 “Consolidation” related to noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. This amendment establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
53
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The amendment clarifies that a noncontrolling interest should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements and requires net income attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be disclosed separately on the face of the consolidated statement of income. The presentation and disclosure requirements of the amendment require retrospective application to all prior periods presented. In accordance with ASC 810, the Company classified noncontrolling interests as equity on our condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was not material.
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as net income and all other non-owner changes in shareholders’ equity. The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income consists of foreign currency translation adjustments, foreign currency hedges, foreign exchange contracts, interest rate swaps, and pension and post retirement related adjustments.
Revenue RecognitionRevenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition.” Revenue is recognized when products have been shipped to the respective customers, title has passed and the price for the product has been determined.
The Company recognizes revenues on long-term contracts based on the percentage of completion method of accounting. The units-of-delivery method or other input-based or output-based measures, as appropriate, are used to measure the progress toward completion of individual contracts. Contract revenues and cost estimates are reviewed and revised at a minimum quarterly and adjustments are reflected in the accounting period as such amounts are determined. Provisions are made currently for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts.
Certain pre-production costs relating to long-term production and supply contracts have been deferred and will be recognized over the life of the contracts. Deferred pre-production costs were $12.1 million and $11.0 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Significant Customers and Concentrations of Credit Risk The Company’s trade receivables are from rail and transit industry original equipment manufacturers, Class I railroads, railroad carriers and commercial companies that utilize rail cars in their operations, such as utility and chemical companies. No one customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated net sales in 2009, 2008 and 2007.
Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs All fees billed to the customer for shipping and handling are classified as a component of net revenues. All costs associated with shipping and handling is classified as a component of cost of sales.
Research and Development Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company incurred costs of approximately $42.4 million, $39.0 million and $37.4 million, respectively.
Employees As of December 31, 2009, approximately 37% of the Company’s workforce was covered by collective bargaining agreements. These agreements are generally effective through 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. Agreements expiring in 2010 cover approximately 21% of the Company’s workforce.
Earnings Per Share Basic and diluted earnings per common share is computed in accordance with ASC 260 “Earnings Per Share.” Unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method included in ASC 260-10-55. (See Note 12 “Earnings Per Share” included herein)
Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified, where necessary, to conform to the current year presentation.
54
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts could differ from the estimates. On an ongoing basis, Management reviews its estimates based on currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In December 2007, updates were made to ASC 805, “Business Combinations” and ASC 810-10-65, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements.” The update to ASC 805 retains the fundamental requirements, but also broadens its scope by applying the acquisition method to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses, and requires, among other things, that assets acquired and liabilities assumed be measured at fair value as of the acquisition date, that liabilities related to contingent consideration be recognized at the acquisition date and remeasured at fair value in each subsequent reporting period, that acquisition-related costs be expensed as incurred, and that income be recognized if the fair value of the net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred. The update to ASC 810-10-65 establishes accounting and reporting standards for noncontrolling interests (i.e., minority interests) in a subsidiary, including changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary and requires, among other things, that noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries be classified as a separate component of equity. Except for the presentation and disclosure requirements of the update to ASC 810-10-65, which are to be applied retrospectively for all periods presented, the updates to ASC 805 and ASC 810-10-65 are to be applied prospectively in financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. This updated standard was effective for the Company for business combination transactions for which the acquisition date was on or after January 1, 2009. The adoption of this updated standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
In June 2008, an update was made to ASC 260-10-55 “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” The update to ASC 260-10-55 states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. ASC 260-10-55 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Upon adoption, a company is required to retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data (including any amounts related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected financial data) to conform with the updates of ASC 260-10-55. The Company adopted the updated ASC 260-10-55 as of January 1, 2009, and has computed earnings per share based on the two-class method. (See Note 12 “Earnings Per Share” included herein).
In December 2008, an update was made to ASC 720-20-65, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” The update to ASC 720-20-65 amends ASC 230-10-55, “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits”, to provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The additional disclosure requirements under the updated ASC 720-20-65 include expanded disclosures about an entity’s investment policies and strategies, the categories of plan assets, concentrations of credit risk and fair value measurements of plan assets. The adoption of this updated standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
In May 2009, and update was made to ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”. The update to ASC 855 requires an entity to recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet. For non-recognized subsequent events that must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading, an entity will be required to disclose the nature of the event as well as an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. In addition, the update to ASC 855 requires an entity to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The company adopted the updated ASC 855 in second quarter 2009. (See “Subsequent Events” above).
55
In June 2009, the FASB issued Update No. 2009-01, “Topic 105-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles amendments based on Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168-The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (ASU 2009-01). ASU 2009-01 establishes only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and nonauthoritative. The switch to the ASC affects the way companies refer to U.S. GAAP in financial statements and accounting policies. Citing particular content in the ASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure. The Company began using the new guidelines and number system prescribed by the ASC when referring to GAAP in the third quarter 2009. As the ASC was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, and adoption of this standard did not have any impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
In June 2009, an update was made to ASC 860 “Transfers and Servicing.” Among other items, the update removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and clarifies that the objective of ASC 860 is to determine whether a transferor and all of the entities included in the transferor’s financial statements being presented have surrendered control over transferred financial assets. The update is effective January 1, 2010. Upon adoption, the Company does not expect this update to have a material impact on its financial condition and results of operations.
In June 2009, an update was made to ASC 810 “Consolidation.” This update amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities and is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. Upon adoption, the Company does not expect this update to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.
In August 2009, the FASB issued Update No. 2009-05, “Fair Value measurement and Disclosures (Topic 820)—Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value” (ASU 2009-05). ASU 2009-05 amends ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” to provide further guidance on how to measure the fair value of a liability. It primarily does three things: 1) sets forth the types of valuation techniques to be used to value a liability when a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, 2) clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability and 3) clarifies that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. ASU 2009-05 is effective beginning fourth quarter of 2009 for the Company. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Update No. 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)—Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (ASU 2009-13). ASU 2009-13 provides amendments to the criteria in ASC 605-25 for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. As a result of those amendments, multiple-deliverable arrangements will be separated in more circumstances than under existing U.S. GAAP. ASU 2009-13: 1) establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, 2) eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, 3) requires that a vendor determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner that is consistent with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis, 4) significantly expands the disclosures related to a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2009-13.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Update No. 2009-14, “Software (Topic 985)—Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (ASU 2009-14). ASU 2009-14 changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible
56
products and software elements and provides additional guidance on how to determine which software, if any, relating to tangible product would be excluded from the scope of the software revenue guidance. In addition, ASU 2009-14 provides guidance on how a vendor should allocate arrangement consideration to deliverables in an arrangement that includes both tangible products and software. ASU 2009-14 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2009-14.
On October 1, 2009, the Company used cash on hand to acquire Unifin International LP, and its affiliate, Cardinal Pumps and Exchangers, Inc. (“Unifin”), a manufacturer of cooling systems and related equipment for the power generation and transmission industry. The purchase price was $92.9 million, net of cash received, resulting in preliminary additional goodwill of $54.8 million, of which all will be deductible for tax purposes. Unifin will operate as a business of Wabtec’s Freight Group. On July 22, 2009, the Company acquired certain assets for $3.4 million.
On December 5, 2008, the Company acquired Standard Car Truck Company (“SCT”), a manufacturer and designer of stabilization systems for freight cars, including engineered truck (undercarriage) components such as springs, friction wedges and wear plates. Its Barber® brand truck design is used throughout the world and holds a leading share of the North American market. The company also manufactures and services locomotives components, including compressors and pumps. The purchase price was $302.6 million, net of cash received, resulting in goodwill of $154.7 million, of which all will be deductible for tax purposes. Included in the purchase price of $302.6 million is $25.0 million related to an escrow deposit, which may be released to the Company for indemnity claims in accordance with the purchase and escrow agreements. On December 5, 2008, the Company acquired a majority of Beijing Wabtec Huaxia Technology Company, Ltd. (“Huaxia”) for $5.6 million. On December 31, 2008, the Company invested $2.8 million in Shenyang CNR Wabtec Railway Brake Technology Company, Ltd. (“Shenyang”) for a minority interest in a joint venture Company. Huaxia and Shenyang manufactures braking equipment, including brake shoes, pads and friction linings for the freight car market in China. On October 27, 2008, the Company acquired certain assets related to the development, sale, service, and maintenance of software programs used in train management systems for $4.5 million. On June 30, 2008, the Company acquired 100% of the stock of Poli S.p.A. (Poli), a European based manufacturer of rail braking equipment including brake discs for high speed applications, as well as tread brake units and pneumatic brake valves that meet International Union of Railways (UIC) standards. Poli will primarily operate as a business of Wabtec’s Transit Group. The purchase price was €55.2 million (about $87.0 million USD), net of cash received, resulting in goodwill of $38.9 million, of which none will be deductible for tax purposes. Included in the purchase price is $11.8 million related to an escrow deposit, which may be released to the Company for indemnity claims, environmental claims or allocation of tax liabilities in accordance with the purchase and escrow agreements.
On June 8, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of the stock of Ricon Corporation (Ricon), a manufacturer of a variety of electro-mechanical wheelchair lifts and ramps and anti-graffiti windows. The purchase price was $73.6 million resulting in additional goodwill of $49.7 million, of which none will be deductible for tax purposes. Included in the purchase price of $73.6 million is $6.5 million related to an escrow deposit, which may be released to the Company for working capital adjustments or indemnity claims in accordance with the purchase and escrow agreements.
Operating results have been included in the consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition date forward.
57
For the Unifin, SCT and Poli acquisition, the following table summarizes the preliminary estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition:
Current assets
Property, plant & equipment
Goodwill and other intangible assets
Other assets
Total assets acquired
Total liabilities assumed
Net assets acquired
Of the preliminary allocation of $33.5 million of acquired intangible assets for Unifin, exclusive of goodwill, $14.8 million was assigned to trade name, $16.3 million was assigned to customer relationships, $278,000 was assigned to patents and $2.1 million was assigned to customer backlog. The trade name is considered to have an indefinite useful life while the customer relationships’ average useful life is 10 years and patents’ average useful life is three years. The allocation of $71.0 million of acquired intangible assets for SCT exclusive of goodwill, $29.3 million was assigned to trade name, $38.5 million was assigned to customer relationships, $743,000 was assigned to patents, $1.0 million was assigned to customer backlog and $1.4 million was assigned to long term contracts. The trade name is considered to have an indefinite useful life while the customer relationships’ average useful life is 24 years and patents’ average useful life is nine years. The allocation of $37.4 million of acquired intangible assets for Poli, exclusive of goodwill, $18.8 million was assigned to trade name, $17.8 million was assigned to customer relationships, $449,000 was assigned to patents and $312,000 was assigned to customer backlog. The trade name is considered to have an indefinite useful life while the customer relationships average useful life is 15 years and patents average useful life is eight years.
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents income statement results as if Poli, SCT, Huaxia and Unifin had occurred January 1, 2008:
In thousands, except per share
Net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders (1)
Diluted earnings per share
As reported
Pro forma
58
Interest paid during the year
Income taxes paid during the year, net of amount refunded
Business acquisitions:
Fair value of assets acquired
Liabilities assumed
Cash paid
Less cash acquired
Net cash paid
On July 31, 2006, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock. On February 20, 2008 the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $100 million of the Company’s outstanding shares. The Company intends to purchase these shares on the open market or in negotiated or block trades. No time limit was set for the completion of the program. The program qualifies under the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement as well as the 6.875% Senior Notes currently outstanding.
Wabtec downsized its Canadian operations by moving certain products to lower-cost facilities and outsourcing. In the Freight segment, Wabtec recorded charges of 4.6 million and $3.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. No charges for these operations and this restructuring plan were recorded in the year ended December 31, 2009. For these operations cumulative expenses for restructuring and other expenses recorded since 2006 have been $16.5 million, comprised of the $5.7 million for employee severance costs for approximately 400 employees; $5.5 million of pension and postretirement benefit curtailment for those employees; $5.3 million related to fixed asset and goodwill impairment. Goodwill impairment was recorded as amortization expense and most of the other charges were recorded in cost of sales. Severance costs are contractual liabilities and payment is dependent on the waiver by or expiration of certain seniority rights of those employees. As of December 31, 2009, $4.2 million of this amount had been paid.
59
The components of inventory, net of reserves, were:
Raw materials
Work-in-process
Finished goods
Total inventories
The major classes of depreciable assets are as follows:
Machinery and equipment
Buildings and improvements
Land and improvements
Locomotive leased fleet
PP&E
Less: accumulated depreciation
The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment are as follows:
Land improvements
Depreciation expense was $25.7 million, $24.7 million, and $25.1 million for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. Other intangibles (with definite lives) are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives. Goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are reviewed annually during the fourth quarter for impairment by applying a fair-value-based test and more frequently when indicators of impairment are present. The fair value was determined using a combination of discounted cash flow analysis and market multiples based upon historical and projected financial information. Goodwill and indefinite live intangible assets were not impaired at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
60
Goodwill was $483.0 million and $319.4 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The adjustment of $103.5 million to Goodwill for is due to Standard Car Truck and Poli. The change in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the year ended December 31, 2009 is as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2008
Adjustment to preliminary purchase allocation
Acquisition
Foreign currency impact
Balance at December 31, 2009
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company’s trademarks had a net carrying amount of $96.0 million and $75.6 million, respectively, and the Company believes these intangibles have an indefinite life. Intangible assets of the Company, other than goodwill and trademarks, consist of the following:
Patents and other, net of accumulated amortization of $26,135 and $28,294
Customer relationships, net of accumulated amortization of $7,122 and $3,399
The weighted average useful lives of patents, customer relationships and intellectual property were seven years, 17 years and 19 years respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets was $9.8 million, $5.0 million, and $3.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
Amortization expense for the five succeeding years is as follows (in thousands):
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
61
On November 4, 2008, the Company refinanced its existing unsecured revolving credit agreement with a consortium of commercial banks. This “2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement” provides the company with a $300 million five-year revolving credit facility and a $200 million five-year term loan facility. The Company incurred $2.9 million of deferred financing cost related to the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement. Both facilities expire in January 2013. The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement borrowings bear variable interest rates indexed to the indices described below. At December 31, 2009, the Company had available bank borrowing capacity, net of $28.6 million of letters of credit, of approximately $200.4 million, subject to certain financial covenant restrictions.
Under the 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement, the Company may elect a Base Rate of interest or an interest rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) of interest (“the Alternate Rate”). The Base Rate adjusts on a daily basis and is the greater of the PNC, N.A. prime rate, 30-day LIBOR plus 150 basis points or the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% per annum, plus a margin that ranges from 25 to 50 basis points. The Alternate rate is based on quoted LIBOR rates plus a margin that ranges from 125 to 200 basis points. Both the Base Rate and Alternate Rate margins are dependent on the Company’s consolidated total indebtedness to cash flow ratios. The initial Base Rate margin is 25 basis points and the Alternate Rate margin is 125 basis points. At December 31, 2009 the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s variable rate debt was 1.49%. To reduce the impact of interest rate changes on a portion of this variable-rate debt, the Company entered into an interest rate swap which effectively converted a portion of the debt from variable to fixed-rate borrowing during the term of the swap contract. On December 31, 2009, the notional value of the interest rate swap outstanding was $92.5 million and effectively changed the Company’s interest rate on bank debt at December 31, 2009 from a variable rate to a fixed rate of 1.84%. The interest rate swap agreement matures in January 2010. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty. However, since only the cash interest payments are exchanged, exposure is significantly less than the notional amount. The counterparty is a large financial institution and the Company does not anticipate nonperformance.
The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement limits the Company’s ability to declare or pay cash dividends and prohibits the Company from declaring or making other distributions, subject to certain exceptions. The 2008 Refinancing Credit Agreement contains various other covenants and restrictions including the following limitations: incurrence of additional indebtedness; mergers, consolidations, sales of assets and acquisitions; additional liens; sale and leasebacks; permissible investments, loans and advances; certain debt payments; and imposes a minimum interest expense coverage ratio of 3.0 and a maximum debt to cash flow ratio of 3.25. The Company is in compliance with these measurements and covenants and expects that these measurements will not be any type of limiting factor in executing our operating activities.
6.875% Senior Notes Due August 2013
In August 2003, the Company issued $150 million of Senior Notes due in 2013 (“the Notes”). The Notes were issued at par. Interest on the Notes accrues at a rate of 6.875% per annum and is payable semi-annually on January 31 and July 31 of each year. The proceeds were used to repay debt outstanding under the Company’s existing credit agreement, and for general corporate purposes. The principal balance is due in full at maturity.
The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu with all existing and future senior debt and senior to all our existing and future subordinated indebtedness of the Company. The indenture under which the Notes were issued contains covenants and restrictions which limit among other things, the following: the incurrence of indebtedness, payment of dividends and certain distributions, sale of assets, change in control, mergers and consolidations and the incurrence of liens.
62
Debt and Capital Leases
Capital leases were acquired in the Poli and SCT acquisitions.
Scheduled principal repayments of debt and capital lease balances as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:
Future years
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The Company sponsors defined benefit pension plans that cover certain U.S., Canadian, German, and United Kingdom employees and which provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service of the employee.
The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for the U.S., Canadian, German and U.K. plans. The following tables provide information regarding the Company’s defined benefit pension plans summarized by U.S. and international components.
63
Obligations and Funded Status
Change in projected benefit obligation
Obligation at beginning of year
Service cost
Interest cost
Employee contributions
Plan curtailments
Plan amendments
Benefits paid
Expenses paid
Premiums paid
Acquisitions
Adjustments due to the adoption of measurement date provisions
Actuarial (loss) gain
Effect of currency rate changes
Obligation at end of year
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Employer contributions
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Funded status
Fair value of plan assets
Benefit obligations
Funded Status
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position consist of:
Noncurrent assets
Current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities
Net amount recognized
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consist of:
Initial net obligation
Prior service costs
Net actuarial loss
64
The aggregate accumulated benefit obligation for the U.S. pension plans was $46.5 million and $45.9 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The aggregate accumulated benefit obligation for the international pension plans was $119.0 million and $90.9 million as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Information for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:
Projected benefit obligation
Accumulated benefit obligation
Information for pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of initial net obligation
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of net loss
Curtailment loss recognized
Settlement loss recognized
Special termination benefit recognized
Net periodic benefit cost
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income during 2009 are as follows:
Net gain (loss) arising during the year
Effect of exchange rates
Amortization, settlement, or curtailment recognition of net transition obligation
Amortization or curtailment recognition of prior service cost
Amortization or settlement recognition of net loss
Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income (loss)
65
The weighted average assumptions in the following table represent the rates used to develop the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation for the year listed and also the net periodic benefit cost for the following year.
Discount rate
Rate of compensation increase
The discount rate is based on settling the pension obligation with high grade, high yield corporate bonds, and the rate of compensation increase is based on actual experience. The expected return on plan assets is based on historical performance as well as expected future rates of return on plan assets considering the current investment portfolio mix and the long-term investment strategy.
As of December 31, 2009 the following table represents the amounts included in other comprehensive loss that are expected to be recognized as components of periodic benefit costs in 2010.
Net transition obligation
Prior service cost
Pension Plan Assets
The Company has established formal investment policies for the assets associated with our pension plans. Objectives include maximizing long-term return at acceptable risk levels and diversifying among asset classes. Asset allocation targets are based on periodic asset liability study results which help determine the appropriate investment strategies. The investment policies permit variances from the targets within certain parameters. The composition plan assets consist primarily of equity security funds, debt security funds, and temporary cash and cash equivalent investments. The assets held in these funds are generally passively managed and are valued at the net asset value per share multiplied by the number of shares held as of the measurement date. The balanced fund provides long-term growth and income by investing in a diversified portfolio of approximately 60% equities and 40% bonds. All plan assets are considered Level 1 based on the fair value valuation hierarchy (See Note 18 “Fair Value Measurement” included herein). Plan assets by asset category at December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
Equity security funds
Debt security funds
Balanced fund
The U.S. and International pension plans have target asset allocations of 60% equity securities and 40% debt securities. Investment policies are determined by the respective Plan’s Pension Committee and set forth in its Investment Policy. Rebalancing of the asset allocation occurs on a quarterly basis.
66
Cash Flows
The Company’s funding methods are based on governmental requirements and differ from those methods used to recognize pension expense. The Company expects to contribute $701,000 to the U.S. plans and $8.7 million to the international plans during 2010.
Benefit payments expected to be paid to plan participants are as follows:
Year ended December 31,
2015 through 2019
Post Retirement Benefit Plans
In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company has provided certain unfunded postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for a portion of North American employees. The Company is not obligated to pay health care and life insurance benefits to individuals who had retired prior to 1990.
The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for all post retirement plans. The following tables provide information regarding the Company’s post retirement benefit plans summarized by U.S. and international components.
67
Special termination benefits
Prior service credit
Net actuarial (loss) gain
68
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Amortization of prior service credit
Amortization of net loss (gain)
Curtailment gain recognized
Net periodic benefit (credit) cost
New prior service cost
Net loss arising during the year
Amortization or settlement recognition of net loss (gain)
The weighted average assumptions in the following table represent the rates used to develop the actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation for the year listed and also the net periodic benefit cost for the following year. The discount rate is based on settling the pension obligation with high grade, high yield corporate bonds.
The assumed health care cost trend rate for the U.S. plans grades from an initial rate of 7.8% to an ultimate rate of 4.5% by 2027 and for international plans from 9.3% to 4.5% by 2028. A 1% increase in the assumed health care cost trend rate will increase the service and interest cost components of the expense recognized for the U.S. and international postretirement plans by approximately $231,000 and $28,000, respectively, for 2010, and increase the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by approximately $3.7 million and $507,000,
69
respectively. A 1% decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rate will decrease the service and interest cost components of the expense recognized for the U.S. and international postretirement plans by approximately $193,000 and $24,000, respectively, for 2010, and decrease the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation by approximately $3.1 million and $435,000, respectively.
Defined Contribution Plans
The Company also participates in certain defined contribution plans and multiemployer pension plans. Costs recognized under these plans are summarized as follows:
Multi-employer pension and health & welfare plans
401(k) savings and other defined contribution plans
The 401(k) savings plan is a participant directed defined contribution plan that holds shares of the Company’s stock as one of the investment options. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the plan held on behalf of its participants about 428,000 shares with a market value of $17.5 million, and 484,000 shares with a market value of $19.2 million, respectively.
Additionally, the Company has stock option based benefit and other plans further described in Note 13.
The Company is responsible for filing consolidated U.S., foreign and combined, unitary or separate state income tax returns. The Company is responsible for paying the taxes relating to such returns, including any subsequent adjustments resulting from the redetermination of such tax liabilities by the applicable taxing authorities. The components of the income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes for the Company’s domestic and foreign operations for the years ended December 31 are provided below:
Foreign
70
No provision has been made for U.S., state, or additional foreign taxes related to undistributed earnings of $146.6 million of foreign subsidiaries which have been or are intended to be permanently re-invested.
The consolidated provision for income taxes included in the Statement of Income consisted of the following:
Current taxes
Federal
State
Deferred taxes
Total provision
The consolidated income tax provision is included in the Statement of Income as follows:
Continuing operations
A reconciliation of the United States federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate on continuing operations for the years ended December 31 is provided below:
U. S. federal statutory rate
State taxes
Adjustment to prior year matters
Tax reserves
Change in valuation allowance
Deferred rate/balance adjustment
Research and development credit
Other, net
Effective rate
The effective income tax rate for 2009 includes a net tax benefit of approximately $9.7 million which is due primarily to the settlement of examinations in various tax jurisdictions.
71
Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences in the recognition of income and expense for financial and income tax reporting purposes. These deferred income taxes will be recognized as future tax benefits or costs when the temporary differences reverse.
Components of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
Deferred income tax assets:
Accrued expenses and reserves
Warranty reserve
Deferred comp/employee benefits
Pension and postretirement obligations
Inventory
State net operating loss
Foreign net operating loss
Tax credit carry forwards
Gross deferred income tax assets
Valuation allowance
Total deferred income tax assets
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Intangibles
Total deferred income tax liabilities
Net deferred income tax asset/(liability)
A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. State and foreign net operating loss carryforwards exist in the amount of $65.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, and are set to expire in various periods from 2011 to 2030.
Federal and foreign tax credits of approximately $1.4 million related to Research and Experimentation credits have been fully utilized in 2009. State tax credits of approximately $866,000 are available and consist of various Machinery & Equipment, Research and Experimentation, and Jobs related credits.
As of December 31, 2009, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions was $10.0 million, of which $2.6 million, if recognized, would favorably affect the Company’s effective income tax rate. As of December 31, 2008, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions was $17.1 million, of which $10.1 million, if recognized, would favorably affect the Company’s effective tax rate. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions follows:
Gross liability for uncertain tax positions at beginning of year
Gross increases—uncertain tax positions in prior periods
Gross decreases—uncertain tax positions in prior periods
Gross increases—current period uncertain tax positions
Gross decreases—audit settlements during year
Gross decreases—expiration of audit statute of limitations
Gross liability for uncertain tax positions at end of year
72
The Company includes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The total interest and penalties accrued as of December 31, 2009 are approximately $3.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, the Company accrued interest and penalties of approximately $4.4 million and $2.4 million, respectively.
The Internal Revenue Service is currently auditing the 2007 and 2008 tax years. With limited exception, the Company is no longer subject to examination by various U.S. and foreign taxing authorities for years before 2006.
At this time, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $3.2 million may change within the next twelve months due to the expiration of statutory review periods and current examinations.
The computation of earnings per share from continuing operations is as follows:
Numerator
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per common share—net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders
Less: dividends declared—common shares and non-vested restricted stock
Undistributed earnings
Percentage allocated to common shareholders (1)
Add: dividends declared—common shares
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per common share
Denominator
Denominator for basic earnings per common share—weighted-average shares
Effect of dilutive securities:
Assumed conversion of dilutive stock-based compensation plans
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share—adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversion
Per common share net income attributable to Wabtec shareholders
(1) Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding and non-vested restricted stock expected to vest
Percentage allocated to common shareholders
Options to purchase approximately 79,200, 32,400, and 4,400 shares of Common Stock were outstanding in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price exceeded the average market price of the common shares.
73
As of December 31, 2009, the Company maintains employee stock-based compensation plans for stock options, non-vested restricted stock, and incentive stock awards as governed by the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the 2000 Plan). The 2000 Plan was amended effective February 16, 2006 to increase the maximum shares then available for future grants under the existing plan of 719,512 by 2,000,000 shares. As of December 31, 2009, shares available for future grants under the 2000 Plan is 1,056,189 shares. No awards may be made under the 2000 Plan subsequent to January 31, 2016. The Company also maintains a Non-Employee Directors’ Fee and Stock Option Plan (Directors Plan).
Stock-based compensation expense was $3.6 million, $10.5 million and $11.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company recognized associated tax benefits related to the stock-based compensation plans of $1.6 million, $3.3 million and $3.6 million for the respective periods. Included in the stock-based compensation expense for 2009 above is $1.9 million of expense related to stock options, $2.8 million related to non-vested restricted stock and $472,000 related to awards issued for directors’ fees, offset by a reduction in expense of $1.6 million related to incentive stock awards,. At December 31, 2009, unamortized compensation expense related to those stock options, non-vested restricted shares and incentive stock awards expected to vest totaled $9.8 million and will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.3 years.
Stock Options Under the 2000 Plan, stock options are granted to eligible employees at the fair market value, which is the average of the high and low Wabtec stock price on the date of grant. Generally, the options become exercisable over a three or four year vesting period and expire ten years from the date of grant.
The Directors Plan, as amended, authorizes a total of 500,000 shares of Common Stock to be issued. Generally, options issued under the plan become exercisable over a three-year vesting period and expire ten years from the date of grant. In addition, as compensation for directors’ fees, a total of 13,500 shares have been awarded to non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2009, 13,500 shares for the year ended December 31, 2008, and 12,000 shares for the year ended December 31, 2007. No awards may be made under the plan subsequent to October 31, 2016. The total number of shares issued under the plan as of December 31, 2009 was 362,000 shares.
The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity and related information for both the 2000 Plan and Directors Plan for the years ended December 31:
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
Granted
Exercised
Canceled
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
Exercisable at December 31, 2009
74
Options outstanding at December 31, 2009 were as follows:
Range of Exercise Prices
Under $13.00
13.00 – 20.00
20.00 – 25.00
25.00 – 30.00
Over 30.00
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
Dividend yield
Risk-free interest rate
Stock price volatility
Expected life (years)
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year
The dividend yield is based on the Company’s dividend rate and the current market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant. Expected life in years is determined from historical stock option exercise data. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury bond rates for the expected life of the option.
Non-Vested Restricted Stock and Incentive Stock Awards Under the 2000 Plan, eligible employees are granted non-vested restricted stock that generally vest over three or four years from the date of grant. In addition, the Company has issued incentive stock awards to eligible employees that vest upon attainment of certain cumulative three year performance goals. The incentive stock awards included in the table below represent the maximum number of shares that may ultimately vest. As of December 31, 2009, based on the Company’s performance, we estimate that the majority of these stock awards will vest and have recorded compensation expense accordingly. If our estimate of the number of these stock awards expected to vest changes in a future accounting period, compensation expense could be reduced and will be recognized over the remaining vesting period.
75
The following table summarizes the non-vested restricted stock and incentive stock awards activity and related information for the years ended December 31:
Vested
Compensation expense for the non-vested restricted stock and incentive stock awards is based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and recognized over the applicable vesting period.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were:
Foreign currency translation (loss) gain
Unrealized (loss) gain on foreign exchange contracts, net of tax of $40 and $14
Unrealized (loss) on interest rate swap contracts, net of tax of $25
Pension benefit plans and post retirement benefit plans, net of tax of $(22,499) and $(25,081)
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
The Company leases office and manufacturing facilities under operating leases with terms ranging from one to 15 years, excluding renewal options.
Total net rental expense charged to operations in 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $8.5 million, $8.1 million and $7.5 million respectively. The amounts above are shown net of sublease rentals of zero, $1.6 million and $1.5 million for the years 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
76
Future minimum rental payments under operating leases with remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of one year are as follows:
2015 and after
The following table reconciles the changes in the Company’s product warranty reserve as follows:
Balance at beginning of period
Warranty expense
Warranty payments
Balance at end of period
The Company’s authorized capital stock includes 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The Board of Directors has the authority to issue the preferred stock and to fix the designations, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such class or series, including dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences, without any further vote or action by the Company’s shareholders. The rights and preferences of the preferred stock would be superior to those of the common stock. At December 31, 2009 and 2008 there was no preferred stock issued or outstanding.
ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and explains the related disclosure requirements. ASC 820 indicates, among other things, that a fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability and defines fair value based upon an exit price model.
Valuation Hierarchy. ASC 820 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on the Company’s assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
77
The following table provides the liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2009, which are included in other current liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance sheet:
Foreign currency forward contracts
Interest rate swap agreements
The following table provides the asset carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2008, which is included in other current assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance sheet:
The Company is exposed to market risks from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which may adversely affect our operating results and financial position. When deemed appropriate, the Company minimizes these risks through entering into foreign currency forward contracts. The foreign currency forward contracts are valued using broker quotations, or market transactions in either the listed or over-the counter markets. As such, these derivative instruments are classified within level 2.
The Company’s defined benefit pension plan assets consist primarily of equity security funds, debt security funds and temporary cash and cash equivalent investments. All plan assets are considered Level 1 based on the fair value valuation hierarchy (See Note 10 “Employee Benefit Plans” included herein).
The Company is subject to a variety of environmental laws and regulations governing discharges to air and water, the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous or solid waste materials and the remediation of contamination associated with releases of hazardous substances. The Company believes its operations currently comply in all material respects with all of the various environmental laws and regulations applicable to our business; however, there can be no assurance that environmental requirements will not change in the future or that we will not incur significant costs to comply with such requirements.
Under terms of the purchase agreement and related documents for the 1990 Acquisition, American Standard, Inc., now known as Trane (“Trane”), has indemnified the Company for certain items including, among other things, certain environmental claims the Company asserted prior to 2000. If Trane was unable to honor or meet these indemnifications, the Company would be responsible for such items. In the opinion of Management, Trane currently has the ability to meet its indemnification obligations.
78
The Company is subject to a RCRA Part B Closure Permit (“the Permit”) issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare, Division of Environmental Quality relating to the monitoring and treatment of groundwater contamination on, and adjacent to, the MotivePower Inc. (Boise, Idaho) facility. In compliance with the Permit, the Company has completed an accelerated plan for the treatment of contaminated groundwater, and continues onsite and offsite monitoring for hazardous constituents. The Company has accruals of approximately $468,000 at December 31, 2009, the estimated remaining costs for remediation and monitoring. The Company was in compliance with the Permit at December 31, 2009.
Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (FWEC), the seller of the Mountaintop, Pennsylvania property to the predecessor of one of the Company’s subsidiaries in 1989, agreed to indemnify the Company’s predecessor and its successors and assigns against certain identified environmental liabilities for which FWEC executed a Consent Order Agreement with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) and EPA. Management believes that this indemnification arrangement is enforceable for the benefit of the Company and that FWEC has the financial resources to honor its obligations under this indemnification arrangement.
Prior to the Company’s acquisition of Young Radiator, Young agreed to clean up alleged contamination on a prior production site in Mattoon, Illinois. The Company has completed the remediation of the site under the state’s voluntary cleanup program and has obtained closure certification for the site from the State of Illinois.
Young ceased manufacturing operations at its Racine, Wisconsin facility in the early 1990s. Investigations prior to the acquisition of Young revealed some levels of contamination on the Racine property. The Company
79
has completed a comprehensive site evaluation and implemented a groundwater remediation program under Wisconsin’s voluntary remediation program. Site monitoring is being conducted to demonstrate attainment of Wisconsin’s cleanup requirements. The Company believes the regulating authority is generally in agreement with the selected remediation approach and findings presented to-date.
The Company has other contingent obligations relating to certain sales leaseback transactions, for locomotives that were assumed in connection with the MotivePower merger in 1999, for which reserves of $677,000 remain as of December 31, 2009.
On October 18, 2007, Faiveley Transport Malmo AB filed a request for arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce alleging breach of contract and trade secret violations relating to the Company’s manufacture and sale of certain components. The components at issue are limited in number and used in the transit industry. On that same day, Faiveley Malmo also filed a related proceeding against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Federal Court”), requesting a preliminary injunction in aid of the arbitration. In both forums, Faiveley Malmo sought to prevent the Company from manufacturing and selling the subject components until the arbitration panel decided Faiveley Malmo’s claim. In the arbitration, Faiveley Malmo also sought monetary damages.
In the Federal Court action, Faiveley Malmo’s request for a preliminary injunction was initially granted, in part, on August 22, 2008. That injunction was vacated by the appellate court on March 9, 2009, and the case was remanded to the District Court for further proceedings. On remand, Faiveley Malmo renewed its request for injunctive relief. The District Court denied that request on August 31, 2009, and Faiveley Malmo has appealed that denial to the appellate court. Faiveley Malmo’s appeal remains pending, but the Company has moved to dismiss the appeal based on the decision rendered in the international arbitration proceeding.
In the international arbitration proceeding Faiveley Malmo originally alleged $128 million in damages, but later reduced its claim to $91 million in damages. The Company has stated that Faiveley Malmo’s claims were grossly overstated, not supported by the facts or circumstances surrounding the case, and frivolous in most respects. An ICC International Court of Arbitration Arbitral Tribunal heard the case during the first half of 2009 and issued an award dated December 21, 2009. Pursuant to the Award, the Company was required to make a $3.9 million royalty payment to Faiveley Malmo, with respect to Faiveley’s Malmo’s claims against the Company alleging breach of contract and trade secret violations. Faiveley Malmo’s parent company, Faiveley Transport, has stated that other Faiveley entities are considering filing claims against the Company arising from the same allegations. The Company will vigorously contest any such claims and does not believe that they would result in any material legal liability.
From time to time the Company is involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its operations in the ordinary course of business. As of the date hereof, the Company is involved in no litigation that the Company believes will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Wabtec has two reportable segments—the Freight Group and the Transit Group. The key factors used to identify these reportable segments are the organization and alignment of the Company’s internal operations, the nature of the products and services, and customer type. The business segments are:
Freight Group manufactures products and provides services geared primarily to the production and operation of freight cars and locomotives, including braking control equipment, on-board electronic components and train coupler equipment.
Transit Group consists of products for passenger transit vehicles and locomotives (typically subways, commuter rail and buses) that include braking, coupling, monitoring systems, climate control and door equipment engineered to meet individual customer specifications, as well as commuter rail locomotives.
80
The Company evaluates its business segments’ operating results based on income from operations. Corporate activities include general corporate expenses, elimination of intersegment transactions, interest income and expense and other unallocated charges. Since certain administrative and other operating expenses and other items have not been allocated to business segments, the results in the following tables are not necessarily a measure computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and may not be comparable to other companies.
Segment financial information for 2009 is as follows:
Sales to external customers
Intersegment sales/(elimination)
Total sales
Income (loss) from operations
Interest expense and other
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
Capital expenditures
Segment assets
Segment financial information for 2008 is as follows:
Segment financial information for 2007 is as follows:
81
The following geographic area data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, includes net sales based on product shipment destination and long-lived assets, which consist of plant, property and equipment, net of depreciation, resident in their respective countries:
United States
Canada
Mexico
United Kingdom
Australia
Germany
Other international
Export sales from the Company’s United States operations were $241.3 million, $261.8 million and $239.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Sales by product are as follows:
Brake Products
Freight Electronics & Specialty Products
Remanufacturing, Overhaul & Build
Other Transit Products
Total Sales
The estimated fair values and related carrying values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:
Foreign exchange contracts
6.875% senior notes
The fair value of the Company’s foreign exchange contracts and senior notes were based on dealer quotes and represent the estimated amount the Company would pay to the counterparty to terminate the agreements.
Effective August 2003, the Company issued $150 million of Senior Notes due in 2013 (“The Notes”). The obligations under the Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by all U.S. subsidiaries as guarantors. In accordance with positions established by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the following shows separate financial information with respect to the parent, the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries. The principal elimination entries eliminate investment in subsidiaries and certain intercompany balances and transactions.
82
Balance Sheet for December 31, 2009:
Other current assets
Investment in Subsidiaries
Other long term assets
Intercompany
Other long term liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Balance Sheet for December 31, 2008:
83
Income Statement for the Year Ended December 31, 2009:
Gross profit (loss)
(Expense) income from operations
Interest (expense) income, net
Other (expense) income, net
Equity earnings (loss)
Pretax income (loss)
Net income (loss) attributable to Wabtec shareholders
Income Statement for the Year Ended December 31, 2008:
Income (loss) from continuing operations
84
Income Statement for the Year Ended December 31, 2007:
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2009:
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
Decrease in cash
Cash, beginning of period
Cash, end of period
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2008:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Increase (decrease) in cash
85
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31, 2007:
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
The components of other expense are as follows:
Foreign currency loss
Other miscellaneous income (expense)
Total other income (expense)
Basic earnings from continuing operations per common share
Diluted earnings from continuing operations per common share
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (net of tax)
The Company operates on a four-four-five week accounting calendar, and accordingly, the quarters end on or about March 31, June 30 and September 30. The fiscal year ends on December 31.
86
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Albert J. Neupaver,
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature and Title
Date
By
/s/ ALBERT J. NEUPAVER
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ ALVAROGARCIA-TUNON
Alvaro Garcia-Tunon,
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ PATRICK D. DUGAN
Patrick D. Dugan,
Vice President, Finance and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ WILLIAM E. KASSLING
William E. Kassling,
Chairman of the Board and Director
/s/ ROBERT J. BROOKS
Robert J. Brooks,
Director
/s/ EMILIO A. FERNANDEZ
Emilio A. Fernandez,
/s/ LEE B. FOSTER, II
Lee B. Foster, II,
/s/ BRIAN P. HEHIR
Brian P. Hehir,
/s/ MICHAEL W. D. HOWELL
Michael W. D. Howell,
87
/s/ JAMES V. NAPIER
James V. Napier,
/s/ NICKOLAS W. VANDESTEEG
Nickolas W. Vande Steeg,
/s/ GARY C. VALADE
Gary C. Valade,
88
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For each of the three years ended December 31
Warranty and overhaul reserves
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Valuation allowance-taxes
Inventory reserves
Merger and restructuring reserve
2007
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibits
Filing Method
90
91
92