Companies:
10,652
total market cap:
$140.555 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
United Rentals
URI
#439
Rank
$55.33 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$869.57
Share price
0.01%
Change (1 day)
21.25%
Change (1 year)
Rental & Leasing Services
Categories
United Rentals, Inc.
is an American equipment rental company. The equipment offered for rent includes lifting and aerial work platforms, forklifts, a large selection of construction machinery as well as pumps, generators and other units.
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
United Rentals
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2012 Q2
United Rentals - 10-Q quarterly report FY2012 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
___________________________________
FORM 10-Q
___________________________________
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2012
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 1-14387
Commission File Number 1-13663
___________________________________
United Rentals, Inc.
United Rentals (North America), Inc.
(Exact Names of Registrants as Specified in Their Charters)
___________________________________
Delaware
Delaware
06-1522496
06-1493538
(States of Incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Nos.)
Five Greenwich Office Park,
Greenwich, Connecticut
06831
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrants’ Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (203) 622-3131
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer
x
Accelerated Filer
¨
Non-Accelerated Filer
¨
Smaller Reporting Company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
¨
Yes
x
No
As of
July 13, 2012
, there were
92,700,607
shares of United Rentals, Inc. common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding. There is no market for the common stock of United Rentals (North America), Inc., all outstanding shares of which are owned by United Rentals, Inc.
This combined Form 10-Q is separately filed by (i) United Rentals, Inc. and (ii) United Rentals (North America), Inc. (which is a wholly owned subsidiary of United Rentals, Inc.). United Rentals (North America), Inc. meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction (H)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this report with the reduced disclosure format permitted by such instruction.
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 2012
INDEX
Page
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
United Rentals, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011
3
United Rentals, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)
4
United Rentals, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)
5
United Rentals, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited)
6
United Rentals, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)
7
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
8
Item 2
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
31
Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
45
Item 4
Controls and Procedures
47
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1
Legal Proceedings
48
Item 1A
Risk Factors
48
Item 2
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
48
Item 6
Exhibits
49
Signatures
51
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believe,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seek,” “on-track,” “plan,” “project,” “forecast,” “intend” or “anticipate,” or the negative thereof or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy or outlook. You are cautioned that our business and operations are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, and, consequently, our actual results may differ materially from those projected.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
the possibility that RSC Holdings, Inc. ("RSC") or other companies that we have acquired or may acquire could have undiscovered liabilities or involve other unexpected costs may strain our management capabilities or may be difficult to integrate;
•
our highly leveraged capital structure requires us to use a substantial portion of our cash flow for debt service and can constrain our flexibility in responding to unanticipated or adverse business conditions;
•
a change in the pace of the recovery in our end markets which began late in the first quarter of 2010. Our business is cyclical and highly sensitive to North American construction and industrial activities. Although we have recently experienced an upturn in rental activity, there is no certainty this trend will continue. If the pace of the recovery slows or construction activity declines, our revenues and, because many of our costs are fixed, our profitability, may be adversely affected;
•
inability to benefit from government spending associated with stimulus-related construction projects;
•
restrictive covenants in our debt instruments, which can limit our financial and operational flexibility;
•
noncompliance with financial or other covenants in our debt agreements, which could result in our lenders terminating our credit facilities and requiring us to repay outstanding borrowings;
•
inability to access the capital that our businesses or growth plans may require;
•
inability to manage credit risk adequately or to collect on contracts with a large number of customers;
•
incurrence of impairment charges;
•
the outcome or other potential consequences of regulatory matters and commercial litigation;
•
incurrence of additional expenses (including indemnification obligations) and other costs in connection with litigation, regulatory and investigatory matters;
•
increases in our maintenance and replacement costs if we age our fleet, and decreases in the residual value of our equipment;
•
inability to sell our new or used fleet in the amounts, or at the prices, we expect;
•
turnover in our management team and inability to attract and retain key personnel;
•
rates we can charge and time utilization we can achieve being less than anticipated;
•
costs we incur being more than anticipated, and the inability to realize expected savings in the amounts or time frames planned;
•
dependence on key suppliers to obtain equipment and other supplies for our business on acceptable terms;
•
competition from existing and new competitors;
•
disruptions in our information technology systems;
•
the costs of complying with environmental and safety regulations;
•
labor disputes, work stoppages or other labor difficulties, which may impact our productivity, and potential enactment of new legislation or other changes in law affecting our labor relations or operations generally;
•
shortfalls in our insurance coverage; and
•
adverse developments in our existing claims or significant increases in new claims.
For a more complete description of these and other possible risks and uncertainties, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as well as to our subsequent filings with the SEC. Our forward-looking statements contained herein speak only as of the date hereof, and we make no commitment to update or publicly release any revisions to forward-looking statements in order to reflect new information or subsequent events, circumstances or changes in expectations.
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share data)
June 30, 2012
December 31, 2011
(unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
$
41
$
36
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $40 at June 30, 2012 and $33 at December 31, 2011
704
464
Inventory
102
44
Prepaid expenses and other assets
106
75
Deferred taxes
66
104
Total current assets
1,019
723
Rental equipment, net
5,095
2,617
Property and equipment, net
419
366
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net
4,281
372
Other long-term assets
128
65
Total assets
$
10,942
$
4,143
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
$
421
$
395
Accounts payable
605
206
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
395
263
Total current liabilities
1,421
864
Long-term debt
6,868
2,592
Subordinated convertible debentures
55
55
Deferred taxes
1,106
470
Other long-term liabilities
62
59
Total liabilities
9,512
4,040
Temporary equity (note 8)
35
39
Common stock—$0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 95,067,158 and 92,675,165 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, at June 30, 2012 and 62,877,530 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011
1
1
Additional paid-in capital
1,959
487
Accumulated deficit
(538
)
(499
)
Treasury stock at cost—2,391,993 and 0 shares at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively
(100
)
—
Accumulated other comprehensive income
73
75
Total stockholders’ equity
1,395
64
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
10,942
$
4,143
See accompanying notes.
3
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In millions, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Revenues:
Equipment rentals
$
845
$
524
$
1,368
$
958
Sales of rental equipment
81
41
157
73
Sales of new equipment
22
21
40
36
Contractor supplies sales
23
22
41
43
Service and other revenues
22
21
43
42
Total revenues
993
629
1,649
1,152
Cost of revenues:
Cost of equipment rentals, excluding depreciation
350
246
596
479
Depreciation of rental equipment
172
103
287
202
Cost of rental equipment sales
56
28
103
46
Cost of new equipment sales
17
17
32
29
Cost of contractor supplies sales
16
16
28
30
Cost of service and other revenues
8
8
16
17
Total cost of revenues
619
418
1,062
803
Gross profit
374
211
587
349
Selling, general and administrative expenses
146
100
248
195
RSC merger related costs
80
—
90
—
Restructuring charge
53
2
53
3
Non-rental depreciation and amortization
49
14
63
26
Operating income
46
95
133
125
Interest expense, net
121
57
189
113
Interest expense—subordinated convertible debentures
1
2
2
4
Other income, net
(12
)
(3
)
(13
)
(4
)
(Loss) income from continuing operations before provision (benefit) for income taxes
(64
)
39
(45
)
12
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
(12
)
11
(6
)
4
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(52
)
$
28
$
(39
)
$
8
Loss from discontinued operation, net of taxes
$
—
$
(1
)
$
—
$
(1
)
Net (loss) income
$
(52
)
$
27
$
(39
)
$
7
Basic (loss) earnings per share:
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(0.63
)
$
0.45
$
(0.53
)
$
0.12
Loss from discontinued operation
$
—
$
(0.01
)
$
—
$
(0.01
)
Net (loss) income
$
(0.63
)
$
0.44
$
(0.53
)
$
0.11
Diluted (loss) earnings per share:
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(0.63
)
$
0.38
$
(0.53
)
$
0.10
Loss from discontinued operation
$
—
$
(0.01
)
$
—
$
(0.01
)
Net (loss) income
$
(0.63
)
$
0.37
$
(0.53
)
$
0.09
See accompanying notes.
4
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(In millions)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Net (loss) income
$
(52
)
$
27
$
(39
)
$
7
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(10
)
2
(1
)
13
Fixed price diesel swaps
(2
)
(1
)
(1
)
—
Other comprehensive (loss) income
(12
)
1
(2
)
13
Comprehensive (loss) income
$
(64
)
$
28
$
(41
)
$
20
See accompanying notes.
5
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
(In millions)
Common Stock
Additional
Treasury Stock
Accumulated
Other
Number of
Shares
Amount
Paid-in
Capital
Accumulated
Deficit
Number of
Shares
Amount
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2011
63
$
1
$
487
$
(499
)
—
$
—
$
75
Net loss
(39
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(1
)
Fixed price diesel swaps
(1
)
RSC acquisition
30
1,425
Stock compensation expense, net (1)
31
Exercise of common stock options
1
11
Conversion of 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes
1
17
4 percent Convertible Senior Notes
4
Shares repurchased and retired
(15
)
Repurchase of common stock
(2
)
2
(100
)
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements, net
(1
)
Balance at June 30, 2012
93
$
1
$
1,959
$
(538
)
2
$
(100
)
$
73
(1)
Includes net stock compensation expense as reported as a separate component in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, and net stock compensation expense included in “Restructuring charge” and "RSC merger related costs" as reported in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
See accompanying notes.
6
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In millions)
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2012
2011
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net (loss) income
$
(39
)
$
7
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
350
228
Amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discounts
12
11
Gain on sales of rental equipment
(54
)
(27
)
Gain on sales of non-rental equipment
(2
)
(1
)
Gain on sale of software subsidiary
(10
)
—
Stock compensation expense, net
13
6
RSC merger related costs
90
—
Restructuring charge
53
3
Loss on retirement of subordinated convertible debentures
—
1
Decrease in deferred taxes
(14
)
(4
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of amounts acquired:
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable
3
(15
)
Increase in inventory
(39
)
(30
)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets
(16
)
(15
)
Increase in accounts payable
96
147
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities
(101
)
(15
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
342
296
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Purchases of rental equipment
(836
)
(412
)
Purchases of non-rental equipment
(62
)
(13
)
Proceeds from sales of rental equipment
157
73
Proceeds from sales of non-rental equipment
12
8
Purchases of other companies
(1,175
)
(143
)
Proceeds from sale of software subsidiary
10
—
Net cash used in investing activities
(1,894
)
(487
)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from debt
4,193
1,107
Payments of debt, including subordinated convertible debentures
(2,464
)
(1,082
)
Proceeds from the exercise of common stock options
11
30
Common stock repurchased
(115
)
(7
)
Payments of financing costs
(67
)
—
Cash paid in connection with the 4 percent Convertible Senior Notes and related hedge, net
—
(9
)
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements, net
(1
)
—
Net cash provided by financing activities
1,557
39
Effect of foreign exchange rates
—
7
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
5
(145
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
36
203
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
41
$
58
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for income taxes, net
$
24
$
16
Cash paid for interest, including subordinated convertible debentures
134
98
See accompanying notes.
7
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
1
. Organization, Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
United Rentals, Inc. (“Holdings,” “URI” or the “Company”) is principally a holding company and conducts its operations primarily through its wholly owned subsidiary, United Rentals (North America), Inc. (“URNA”), and subsidiaries of URNA. Holdings’ primary asset is its sole ownership of all issued and outstanding shares of common stock of URNA. URNA’s various credit agreements and debt instruments place restrictions on its ability to transfer funds to its shareholder.
We rent equipment to a diverse customer base that includes construction and industrial companies, manufacturers, utilities, municipalities, homeowners and government entities in the United States and Canada. In addition to renting equipment, we sell new and used rental equipment, as well as related contractor supplies, parts and service.
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with the accounting policies described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2011
(the “2011 Form 10-K”) and the interim reporting requirements of Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the 2011 Form 10-K.
In our opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of financial condition, operating results and cash flows for the interim periods presented have been made. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results of the full year.
2
. Acquisitions
On
April 30, 2012
(“the acquisition date”), we acquired
100
percent of the outstanding common shares and voting interest of RSC Holdings, Inc. (“RSC”). The results of RSC's operations have been included in the condensed consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date. RSC was one of the largest equipment rental providers in North America, and had a network of
440
rental locations in
43
U.S. states and
three
Canadian provinces as of
December 31, 2011
. We believe that the acquisition will create a leading North American equipment rental company with a more attractive business mix, greater scale and enhanced growth prospects, and that the acquisition will provide us with financial benefits including reduced operating expenses and additional revenue opportunities.
The acquisition date fair value of the consideration transferred of
$2.6
billion consisted of the following:
Cash consideration
$
1,161
Stock consideration (30 million shares valued based on the URI acquisition date stock price)
1,396
Share-based compensation awards (1)
29
Total purchase consideration
$
2,586
(1)
This relates to RSC stock options and restricted stock units which were outstanding as of the acquisition date. Each RSC stock option was converted into an adjusted URI stock option to acquire a number of shares of URI common stock, determined by multiplying the number of shares of RSC common stock subject to the RSC stock option by the option exchange ratio (rounded down, if necessary, to a whole share of URI common stock). The “option exchange ratio” means the sum of (i)
0.2783
and (ii) the quotient determined by dividing
$10.80
by the volume-weighted average of the closing sale prices of shares of URI common stock as reported on the NYSE composite transactions reporting system for each of the
ten
consecutive trading days ending with the acquisition date. The option exchange ratio was
0.5161
. The exercise price per share of URI common stock subject to the adjusted URI option is equal to the per share exercise price of such RSC stock option divided by the option exchange ratio (rounded up, if necessary, to the nearest whole cent). Each RSC restricted stock unit (other than an award held by a member of the RSC board who was not also an employee or officer of RSC at such time) was converted into an adjusted URI restricted stock unit in an amount determined by multiplying the number of shares of RSC common stock subject to the RSC restricted stock unit by the option exchange ratio. The portion of the URI replacement awards that has been included in the purchase consideration was calculated as
$29
and is based on the vesting which occurred prior to the acquisition date.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The purchase price allocations for these assets and liabilities are based on preliminary valuations and are subject to change as we obtain additional information during the acquisition measurement period.
8
Table of Contents
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts (1)
$
238
Inventory
19
Deferred taxes
15
Rental equipment, net
2,011
Property and equipment, net
47
Intangibles (2)
1,239
Other assets
58
Total identifiable assets acquired
3,627
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt (3)
(1,586
)
Current liabilities
(405
)
Deferred taxes
(702
)
Long-term debt (3)
(992
)
Other long-term liabilities
(13
)
Total liabilities assumed
(3,698
)
Net identifiable assets acquired
(71
)
Goodwill (4)
2,657
Net assets acquired
$
2,586
(1)
The fair value of accounts receivables acquired was
$238
, and the gross contractual amount was
$251
. We estimate that
$13
will be uncollectible.
(2)
The following table reflects the estimated fair values and useful lives of the acquired intangible assets identified based on URI's preliminary purchase accounting assessments:
Fair value
Life (years)
Customer relationships
$
1,110
15
Trade names, associated trademarks and other
81
5
Non-compete agreements
48
5
Total
$
1,239
(3)
At the closing of the merger, URNA repaid RSC's senior ABL facility, 10 percent senior notes, and 9
1
/
2
percent senior notes. The repaid debt is reflected as short-term above as it was paid on the acquisition date. The RSC debt reflected in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
June 30, 2012
is discussed further in note
8
to the condensed consolidated financial statements. The debt in the table above includes
$1,555
of the repaid RSC debt, and the fair values of the following debt assumed by URNA:
10
1
/
4
percent Senior Notes
$
(225
)
8
1
/
4
percent Senior Notes
(699
)
Capital leases
(99
)
Total assumed debt
$
(1,023
)
(4)
All of the goodwill was assigned to our general rentals segment. The level of goodwill expected to result from the merger is primarily reflective of RSC's going-concern value, the value of RSC's assembled workforce, new customer relationships expected to arise from the merger, and operational synergies that we expect to achieve that would not be available to other market participants. None of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
The three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
include acquisition-related costs of
$80
and
$90
, respectively. Additionally, in 2011, we recognized
$19
of additional acquisition-related costs. The acquisition-related costs are reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations as “RSC merger related costs” and primarily relate to financial and legal advisory fees. Additionally, the fees for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
include
$31
of interim bridge financing fees. Subsequent to
June 30, 2012
, we expect to incur an additional
$30
to
$50
of charges in connection with the merger, and we expect to recognize such costs by
March 31, 2013
. In addition to the acquisition-related costs reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations, we capitalized
$67
of debt issuance costs associated with the issuance of debt to fund the acquisition, which are reflected, net of amortization subsequent to the acquisition date, in other long-term assets in our
June 30,
9
Table of Contents
2012
condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Since the acquisition date, significant amounts of fleet have been moved between URI locations and the acquired RSC locations, and it is not practicable to reasonably estimate the amounts of revenue and earnings of RSC since the acquisition date. The impact of the RSC acquisition on our equipment rentals revenue is primarily reflected in the increases in the volume of OEC on rent of
63.7
percent and
42.9
percent for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, respectively.
The table below presents pro forma consolidated income statement information as if RSC had been included in our consolidated results for the entire periods reflected. The pro forma information has been prepared using the purchase method of accounting, giving effect to the RSC acquisition as if the acquisition had been completed on
January 1, 2011
(“the pro forma acquisition date”). The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of our results of operations had the merger been completed on the above date, nor is it necessarily indicative of our future results. The pro forma information does not reflect any cost savings from operating efficiencies or synergies that could result from the merger, and also does not reflect additional revenue opportunities following the merger. The pro forma information includes adjustments to record the assets and liabilities of RSC at their respective fair values based on available information and to give effect to the financing for the acquisition and related transactions. The pro forma adjustments reflected in the table below are subject to change as additional analysis is performed. The purchase price allocations for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on preliminary valuations and are subject to change as we obtain additional information during the acquisition measurement period. Increases or decreases in the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired may impact our statements of operations in future periods. We expect that the values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed will be finalized during the one-year measurement period following the acquisition date.
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Revenues
$
1,132
$
996
$
2,196
$
1,846
Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision (benefit) for income taxes
61
(42
)
47
(245
)
Pro forma revenues reflect combined URI and RSC. Pro forma income (loss) from continuing operations before provision (benefit) for income taxes reflects combined URI and RSC with the following pro forma adjustments: 1) depreciation of rental equipment and non rental depreciation were adjusted for the fair value mark-ups of equipment acquired in the RSC acquisition, the impact of which was offset by the impact of extending the useful lives of such equipment, 2) cost of rental equipment sales was adjusted for the fair value mark-ups of rental equipment acquired in the RSC acquisition, 3) the intangible assets acquired in the RSC acquisition were amortized, 4) interest expense was adjusted to reflect interest on the merger financing notes described in note
8
to the condensed consolidated financial statements, 5) RSC historic interest on debt that is not part of the combined entity was eliminated, 6) RSC historic interest was adjusted for the fair value mark-ups of the debt acquired in the RSC acquisition, 7) the RSC merger related costs were eliminated as they were assumed to have been recognized prior to the pro forma acquisition date and 8) restructuring charges comprised of severance costs and branch closure charges associated with the merger were recognized from the pro forma acquisition date through
June 30, 2012
. For the pro forma presentation, half of the restructuring charges were recognized in the first quarter following the pro forma acquisition date, and the remaining charges were recognized on a straight-line basis through
June 30, 2012
. As of
June 30, 2012
, we have recognized
$52
of such restructuring charges, and expect to recognize an additional
$60
to
$80
of restructuring charges subsequent to
June 30, 2012
.
3
. Segment Information
Our reportable segments are general rentals and trench safety, power and HVAC (“heating, ventilating and air conditioning”). The general rentals segment includes the rental of construction, infrastructure, industrial and homeowner equipment and related services and activities. The general rentals segment’s customers include construction and industrial companies, manufacturers, utilities, municipalities, homeowners and government entities. The general rentals segment comprises
12
geographic regions—Eastern Canada, Gulf South, Industrial (which serves the geographic Gulf region and has a strong industrial presence), Mid-Atlantic, Mid-Central, Midwest, Mountain West, Northeast, Northwest, South, Southeast and Southwest—and operates throughout the United States and Canada. The trench safety, power and HVAC segment includes the rental of specialty construction products and related services. The trench safety, power and HVAC segment’s customers include construction companies involved in infrastructure projects, municipalities and industrial companies. This segment operates throughout the United States and in Canada. These segments align our external segment reporting with how management evaluates and allocates resources. We evaluate segment performance based on segment equipment rentals gross profit.
The following tables set forth financial information by segment.
10
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
General
rentals
Trench safety,
power and HVAC
Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Equipment rentals
$
781
$
64
$
845
Sales of rental equipment
78
3
81
Sales of new equipment
20
2
22
Contractor supplies sales
21
2
23
Service and other revenues
21
1
22
Total revenue
921
72
993
Depreciation and amortization expense
209
12
221
Equipment rentals gross profit
293
30
323
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
Equipment rentals
$
479
$
45
$
524
Sales of rental equipment
40
1
41
Sales of new equipment
18
3
21
Contractor supplies sales
20
2
22
Service and other revenues
20
1
21
Total revenue
577
52
629
Depreciation and amortization expense
109
8
117
Equipment rentals gross profit
156
19
175
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Equipment rentals
$
1,256
$
112
$
1,368
Sales of rental equipment
152
5
157
Sales of new equipment
37
3
40
Contractor supplies sales
37
4
41
Service and other revenues
41
2
43
Total revenue
1,523
126
1,649
Depreciation and amortization expense
328
22
350
Equipment rentals gross profit
437
48
485
Capital expenditures
853
45
898
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Equipment rentals
$
879
$
79
$
958
Sales of rental equipment
70
3
73
Sales of new equipment
32
4
36
Contractor supplies sales
40
3
43
Service and other revenues
40
2
42
Total revenue
1,061
91
1,152
Depreciation and amortization expense
214
14
228
Equipment rentals gross profit
244
33
277
Capital expenditures
391
34
425
11
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
June 30,
2012
December 31,
2011
Total reportable segment assets
General rentals
$
10,485
$
3,776
Trench safety, power and HVAC
457
367
Total assets
$
10,942
$
4,143
Equipment rentals gross profit is the primary measure management reviews to make operating decisions and assess segment performance. The following is a reconciliation of equipment rentals gross profit to (loss) income from continuing operations before (benefit) provision for income taxes:
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Total equipment rentals gross profit
$
323
$
175
$
485
$
277
Gross profit from other lines of business
51
36
102
72
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(146
)
(100
)
(248
)
(195
)
RSC merger related costs
(80
)
—
(90
)
—
Restructuring charge
(53
)
(2
)
(53
)
(3
)
Non-rental depreciation and amortization
(49
)
(14
)
(63
)
(26
)
Interest expense, net
(121
)
(57
)
(189
)
(113
)
Interest expense- subordinated convertible debentures
(1
)
(2
)
(2
)
(4
)
Other income, net
12
3
13
4
(Loss) income from continuing operations before (benefit) provision for income taxes
$
(64
)
$
39
$
(45
)
$
12
4
. Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges
Closed Restructuring Program
Over the past several years, we have been focused on reducing our operating costs. In connection with this strategy, and in recognition of the challenging economic environment, we reduced our employee headcount from approximately
10,900
at January 1, 2008 (the beginning of the restructuring period) to approximately
7,500
at December 31, 2011 (the end of the restructuring period). Additionally, we reduced our branch network from
697
locations at January 1, 2008 to
529
locations at December 31, 2011. For the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2011
, the restructuring charge primarily reflected branch closure charges due to continuing lease obligations at vacant facilities.
Current Restructuring Program
In the second quarter of 2012, we initiated a new restructuring program related to severance costs and branch closure charges associated with the RSC merger. The branch closure charges principally relate to continuing lease obligations at vacant facilities closed subsequent to the RSC merger. As of
June 30, 2012
, our employee headcount is approximately
11,500
and our branch network has
969
rental locations. Subsequent to
June 30, 2012
, we expect to incur an additional
$60
to
$80
of charges in connection with the restructuring, which is expected to be substantially complete by
March 31, 2013
.
The table below provides certain information concerning our restructuring charges for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
:
12
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
Reserve Balance at
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses(1)
Payments
and Other
Reserve Balance at
Description
December 31, 2011
June 30, 2012
Closed Restructuring Program
Branch closure charges
$
27
$
1
$
(2
)
$
26
Severance costs
1
—
(1
)
—
Total
$
28
$
1
$
(3
)
$
26
Current Restructuring Program
Branch closure charges
$
—
$
18
$
(1
)
$
17
Severance costs
—
34
(14
)
20
Total
$
—
$
52
$
(15
)
$
37
Total
Branch closure charges
$
27
$
19
$
(3
)
$
43
Severance costs
1
34
(15
)
20
Total
$
28
$
53
$
(18
)
$
63
_________________
(1)
Reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of operations as “Restructuring charge.” These charges are not allocated to our reportable segments.
Asset Impairment Charges
In addition to the restructuring charges discussed above, during the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, we recorded asset impairment charges of
$2
and
$3
, respectively, in our general rentals segment. During the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2011
, we recorded asset impairment charges of
$1
in our general rentals segment. The asset impairment charges are primarily reflected in non-rental depreciation and amortization in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and principally relate to write-offs of leasehold improvements and other fixed assets in connection with the restructuring activity discussed above.
5
. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We have made acquisitions over the years, principally during the period from 1997 to 2000, which included the recognition of a significant amount of goodwill. As discussed in note
2
to our condensed consolidated financial statements, on
April 30, 2012
, we completed the acquisition of RSC. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment loss may have been incurred.
The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
:
General rentals
Trench safety,
power and HVAC
Total (1)
Balance at January 1, 2012
$
167
$
122
$
289
Goodwill related to acquisitions
2,657
41
2,698
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments
5
2
7
Balance at June 30, 2012
$
2,829
$
165
$
2,994
_________________
(1)
The total carrying amount of goodwill for all periods in the table above is reflected net of
$1,557
of accumulated impairment charges, which were primarily recorded in our general rentals segment.
Other intangible assets were comprised of the following at
June 30, 2012
and December 31 2011:
13
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2012
Weighted-Average Remaining
Amortization Period
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Amount
Non-compete agreements
57 months
$
77
$
26
$
51
Customer relationships
14 years
1,229
69
1,160
Trade names, associated trademarks and other
58 months
82
6
76
December 31, 2011
Weighted-Average Remaining
Amortization Period
Gross
Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Amount
Non-compete agreements
46 months
$
30
$
25
$
5
Customer relationships
9 years
$
121
$
43
$
78
Our other intangibles assets, net at
June 30, 2012
includes the following assets associated with the 2012 acquisition of RSC discussed above (see note
2
to our condensed consolidated financial statements). No residual value has been assigned to these intangible assets. The non-compete agreements are being amortized on a straight-line basis, and the customer relationships and trade names, associated trademarks and other are being amortized using the sum of the years' digits method, which we believe best reflects the estimated pattern in which the economic benefits will be consumed.
Weighted-Average Initial Amortization Period
Net
Carrying
Amount
Non-compete agreements
60 months
$
45
Customer relationships
15 years
1,087
Trade names, associated trademarks and other
60 months
77
Amortization expense for other intangible assets was
$27
and
$1
for the three months ended
June 30, 2012
and
2011
, respectively, and
$30
and
$3
for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and
2011
, respectively. The 2012 increases primarily reflect the 2012 acquisition of RSC discussed in note
2
to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
As of
June 30, 2012
, estimated amortization expense for other intangible assets for each of the next
five
years and thereafter is as follows:
2012
$
94
2013
177
2014
161
2015
145
2016
130
Thereafter
580
Total
$
1,287
6
. Derivatives
We recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value, and recognize changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments based on the designation of the derivative. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, we designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as either a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge. As of
June 30, 2012
, we do not have any outstanding derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges. The effective portion of the changes in fair value of derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive income for cash flow hedges are reclassified into earnings in the same period that the hedged item is recognized in earnings.
14
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
The ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges is recorded currently in earnings. For derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting, we recognize gains or losses due to changes in fair value in our condensed consolidated statements of operations during the period in which the changes in fair value occur.
We are exposed to certain risks related to our ongoing business operations. During the
three
and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and
2011
, the primary risks we managed using derivative instruments were diesel price risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk. At
June 30, 2012
, we had outstanding fixed price swap contracts on diesel purchases which were entered into to mitigate the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of diesel. During the
six
months ended
June 30, 2011
, we entered into forward contracts to purchase Canadian dollars to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with certain Canadian dollar denominated intercompany loans. At
June 30, 2012
and
December 31, 2011
, there were no outstanding forward contracts to purchase Canadian dollars. The outstanding forward contracts on diesel purchases were designated and qualify as cash flow hedges and the forward contracts to purchase Canadian dollars represented derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments.
Fixed Price Diesel Swaps
The fixed price swap contracts on diesel purchases that were outstanding at
June 30, 2012
were designated and qualify as cash flow hedges and the effective portion of the gain or loss on these contracts is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and is reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings (i.e., when the hedged gallons of diesel are used). The remaining gain or loss on the fixed price swap contracts in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any (i.e., the ineffective portion), is recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations during the current period. As of
June 30, 2012
, we had outstanding fixed price swap contracts covering
7.7 million
gallons of diesel which will be purchased throughout
2012
and
2013
.
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts
The forward contracts to purchase Canadian dollars, which were all settled as of
June 30, 2012
, represented derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments and gains or losses due to changes in the fair value of the forward contracts were recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations during the period in which the changes in fair value occurred. During the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, forward contracts were used to purchase
$30
Canadian dollars, representing the total amount due at maturity for certain Canadian dollar denominated intercompany loans that were settled during the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
. Upon maturity, the proceeds from the forward contracts were used to pay down the Canadian dollar denominated intercompany loans.
Financial Statement Presentation
As of
June 30, 2012
and
December 31, 2011
,
$2
and
$1
, respectively, were reflected in accrued expenses and other liabilities, and
$1
and
less than $1
, respectively, were reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income in our condensed consolidated balance sheets associated with the outstanding fixed price swap contracts that were designated and qualify as cash flow hedges.
The effect of our derivative instruments on our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and
2011
was as follows:
15
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
Location of income
(expense)
recognized on
derivative/hedged item
Amount of income
(expense)
recognized
on derivative
Amount of income
(expense)
recognized
on hedged item
Amount of income
(expense)
recognized
on derivative
Amount of income
(expense)
recognized
on hedged item
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Fixed price diesel swaps
Other income
(expense), net (1)
$ *
$ *
Cost of equipment
rentals, excluding
depreciation (2),
(3)
*
$
(6
)
1
$
(7
)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward contracts
Other income
(expense), net
(1
)
1
*
*
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Location of income
(expense)
recognized on
derivative/hedged item
Amount of income
(expense)
recognized
on derivative
Amount of income
(expense)
recognized
on hedged item
Amount of income
(expense)
recognized
on derivative
Amount of income
(expense)
recognized
on hedged item
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Fixed price diesel swaps
Other income
(expense), net (1)
$ *
$ *
Cost of equipment
rentals, excluding
depreciation (2),
(3)
*
$
(11
)
1
$
(10
)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Foreign currency forward contracts
Other income
(expense), net
(1
)
1
4
(4
)
*
Amounts are insignificant (less than
$1
).
(1)
Represents the ineffective portion of the fixed price diesel swaps.
(2)
Amounts recognized on derivative represent the effective portion of the fixed price diesel swaps.
(3)
Amounts recognized on hedged item reflect the use of
1.5 million
and
1.7 million
gallons of diesel covered by the fixed price swaps during the three months ended
June 30, 2012
and
2011
, respectively, and the use of
2.7 million
and
2.6 million
gallons of diesel covered by the fixed price swaps during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and
2011
, respectively.
7
. Fair Value Measurements
We account for certain assets and liabilities at fair value. We categorize each of our fair value measurements in one of the following three levels based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety:
Level 1- Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.
Level 2- Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities include:
a)
quoted prices for similar assets in active markets;
b)
quoted prices for identical or similar assets in inactive markets;
16
Table of Contents
c)
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset;
d)
inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
If the asset has a specified (contractual) term, the Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset.
Level 3- Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity) and significant to the fair value measure.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value
As of
June 30, 2012
and
December 31, 2011
, our only assets and liabilities measured at fair value were our fixed price diesel swaps contracts, which are Level 2 derivatives measured at fair value on a recurring basis. As of
June 30, 2012
and
December 31, 2011
,
$2
and
$1
, respectively, were reflected in accrued expenses and other liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets, reflecting the fair values of the fixed price diesel swaps contracts. As discussed in note
6
to the condensed consolidated financial statements, we entered into the fixed price swap contracts on diesel purchases to mitigate the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of diesel. Fair value is determined based on observable market data. As of
June 30, 2012
, we have fixed price swap contracts that mature throughout
2012
and
2013
covering
7.7 million
gallons of diesel which we will buy at the average contract price of
$3.94
per gallon, while the average forward price for the hedged gallons was
$3.64
per gallon as of
June 30, 2012
.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheets for accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities approximate fair value due to the immediate to short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The fair values of our ABL facility and accounts receivable securitization facility approximate their book values as of
June 30, 2012
and
December 31, 2011
. The estimated fair values of our financial instruments as of
June 30, 2012
and
December 31, 2011
have been calculated based upon available market information or an appropriate valuation technique, and are presented below by level in the fair value hierarchy:
June 30, 2012
December 31, 2011
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Carrying
Amount
Fair
Value
Level 1:
Subordinated convertible debentures
$
55
$
55
$
55
$
49
Senior and senior subordinated notes
5,480
5,737
1,732
1,795
Level 2:
4 percent Convertible Senior Notes (1)
133
148
129
138
Level 3:
Capital leases (2)
132
117
39
33
___________________
(1)
The fair value of the
4 percent
Convertible Senior Note
s is based on the market value of comparable notes. Consistent with the carrying amount, the fair value excludes the equity component of the notes. To exclude the equity component and calculate the fair value, we used an effective interest rate of
8.0
percent.
(2)
The fair value of capital leases reflects the present value of the leases, which was determined using a
7.0
percent interest rate.
8
. Debt and Subordinated Convertible Debentures
Debt consists of the following:
17
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
June 30, 2012
December 31, 2011
URNA and subsidiaries debt:
Accounts Receivable Securitization Facility (1)
$
252
$
255
$1.9 billion ABL Facility (2)
1,287
810
10
7
/
8
percent Senior Notes
490
489
10
1
/
4
percent Senior Notes (3)
224
—
9
1
/
4
percent Senior Notes
493
493
8
3
/
8
percent Senior Subordinated Notes
750
750
8
1
/
4
percent Senior Notes (3)
698
—
1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes (4)
5
22
Capital leases (3)
132
39
Merger financing notes (5):
5
3
/
4
percent Senior Secured Notes
750
—
7
3
/
8
percent Senior Notes
750
—
7
5
/
8
percent Senior Notes
1,325
—
Total URNA and subsidiaries debt
7,156
2,858
Holdings:
4 percent Convertible Senior Notes (6)
133
129
Total debt (7)
7,289
2,987
Less short-term portion (8)
(421
)
(395
)
Total long-term debt
$
6,868
$
2,592
___________________
(1)
At
June 30, 2012
,
$20
was available under our accounts receivable securitization facility. The interest rate applicable to the accounts receivable securitization facility was
0.9 percent
at
June 30, 2012
. During the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, the monthly average amount outstanding under the accounts receivable securitization facility was
$230
, and the weighted-average interest rate thereon was
0.9 percent
. The maximum month-end amount outstanding under the accounts receivable securitization facility during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
was
$252
.
(2)
At
June 30, 2012
,
$494
was available under our ABL facility, net of
$119
of letters of credit. The interest rate applicable to the ABL facility was
2.3 percent
at
June 30, 2012
. During the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, the monthly average amount outstanding under the ABL facility was
$1,048
, and the weighted-average interest rate thereon was
2.4 percent
. The maximum month-end amount outstanding under the ABL facility during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
was
$1,287
. In March 2012, the size of the ABL facility was increased to
$1.9 billion
.
(3)
Upon consummation of the RSC merger, we assumed certain of RSC's debt, including capital leases. See below for additional detail regarding the assumed RSC debt.
(4)
Based on the price of our common stock during the
first
quarter of 2012, holders of the 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes had the right to convert the notes during the
second
quarter of 2012 at a conversion price of
$21.83
per share of common stock, and
$17
of the 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes were converted. Upon conversion of the notes, we issued approximately
0.8 million
shares of our common stock to the applicable holders of the 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes. Based on the price of our common stock during the
second
quarter of 2012, holders of the 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes may convert the notes during the
third
quarter of 2012 at a conversion price of
$21.83
per share of common stock. Between
July 1, 2012
(the beginning of the
third
quarter) and
July 13, 2012
, none of the 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes were converted.
(5)
In connection with the RSC merger, on
March 9, 2012
, we issued the merger financing notes. See below for additional detail regarding each of the merger financing notes.
(6)
The difference between the
June 30, 2012
carrying value of the
4 percent
Convertible Senior Notes and the
$168
principal amount reflects the
$35
unamortized portion of the original issue discount recognized upon issuance of the notes, which is being amortized through the maturity date of November 15, 2015. Because the
4 percent
Convertible Senior Notes were redeemable at
June 30, 2012
, an amount equal to the
$35
unamortized portion of the original issue discount is separately classified in our condensed consolidated balance sheets and referred to as “temporary equity.” Based on the price of our common stock during the
second
quarter of 2012, holders of the
4 percent
Convertible Senior Notes have the right to
18
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
redeem the notes during the
third
quarter of 2012 at a conversion price of
$11.11
per share of common stock. Between
July 1, 2012
(the beginning of the
third
quarter) and
July 13, 2012
, none of the
4 percent
Convertible Senior Notes were redeemed.
(7)
In August 1998, a subsidiary trust of Holdings (the “Trust”) issued and sold
$300
of 6
1
/
2
percent Convertible Quarterly Income Preferred Securities (“QUIPS”) in a private offering. The Trust used the proceeds from the offering to purchase 6
1
/
2
percent subordinated convertible debentures due 2028 (the “Debentures”), which resulted in Holdings receiving all of the net proceeds of the offering. The QUIPS are non-voting securities, carry a liquidation value of
$50
(fifty dollars) per security and are convertible into Holdings’ common stock. Total debt at
June 30, 2012
and
December 31, 2011
excludes
$55
of these Debentures, which are separately classified in our condensed consolidated balance sheets and referred to as “subordinated convertible debentures.” The subordinated convertible debentures reflect the obligation to our subsidiary that has issued the QUIPS. This subsidiary is not consolidated in our financial statements because we are not the primary beneficiary of the Trust.
(8)
As of
June 30, 2012
, our short-term debt primarily reflects
$252
of borrowings under our accounts receivable securitization facility and
$133
of
4 percent
Convertible Senior Notes. The
4 percent
Convertible Senior Notes mature in 2015, but are reflected as short-term debt because they are redeemable at
June 30, 2012
.
Assumed RSC Debt
10
1
/
4
percent Senior Notes
. In November 2009, RSC issued
$200
aggregate principal amount of 10
1
/
4
percent Senior Notes (the “10
1
/
4
percent Notes”), which are due
November 15, 2019
. Upon consummation of the RSC merger, URNA assumed the 10
1
/
4
percent Notes. The 10
1
/
4
percent Notes are unsecured and are guaranteed by URNA's domestic subsidiaries, subject to limited exceptions. The 10
1
/
4
percent Notes may be redeemed on or after
November 15, 2014
at specified redemption prices that range from
105.125
percent in
2014
to
100
percent in
2017
and thereafter. The indenture governing the 10
1
/
4
percent Notes contains certain restrictive covenants that apply to URNA and its restricted subsidiaries, including, among others, limitations on their ability to (1) incur additional debt, (2) pay dividends or distributions on their capital stock or repurchase their capital stock, (3) make certain investments, (4) create liens on their assets to secure debt, (5) enter into transactions with affiliates, (6) create limitations on the ability of the restricted subsidiaries to make dividends or distributions to their respective parents, (7) merge or consolidate with another company and (8) transfer and sell assets. The indenture also requires that, in the event of a change of control (as defined in the indenture), URNA must make an offer to purchase all of the then outstanding 10
1
/
4
percent Notes tendered at a purchase price in cash equal to
101
percent of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon. The difference between the
June 30, 2012
carrying value of the 10
1
/
4
percent Notes and the
$200
principal amount relates to the
$24
unamortized portion of the fair value adjustment recognized upon consummation of the RSC merger, which is being amortized through the above maturity date. The effective interest rate on the 10
1
/
4
percent Notes is
8.3
percent.
8
1
/
4
percent Senior Notes.
In January 2011, RSC issued
$650
aggregate principal amount of 8
1
/
4
percent Senior Notes (the “8
1
/
4
percent Notes”), which are due
February 1, 2021
. Upon consummation of the RSC merger, URNA assumed the 8
1
/
4
percent Notes. The 8
1
/
4
percent Notes are unsecured and are guaranteed by URNA's domestic subsidiaries, subject to limited exceptions. The 8
1
/
4
percent Notes may be redeemed on or after
February 1, 2016
at specified redemption prices that range from
104.125
percent in
2016
to
100
percent in
2019
and thereafter. The indenture governing the 8 1/4 percent Notes contains certain restrictive covenants that apply to URNA and its restricted subsidiaries, including, among others, limitations on their ability to (1) incur additional debt, (2) pay dividends or distributions on their capital stock or repurchase their capital stock, (3) make certain investments, (4) create liens on their assets to secure debt, (5) enter into transactions with affiliates, (6) create limitations on the ability of the restricted subsidiaries to make dividends or distributions to their respective parents, (7) merge or consolidate with another company and (8) transfer and sell assets. The indenture also requires that, in the event of a change of control (as defined in the indenture), URNA must make an offer to purchase all of the then outstanding 8
1
/
4
percent Notes tendered at a purchase price in cash equal to
101
percent of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon. The difference between the
June 30, 2012
carrying value of the 8
1
/
4
percent Notes and the
$650
principal amount relates to the
$48
unamortized portion of the fair value adjustment recognized upon consummation of the RSC merger, which is being amortized through the above maturity date. The effective interest rate on the 8
1
/
4
percent Notes is
7.0
percent.
Merger Financing Notes
5
3
/
4
percent Senior Secured Notes
. In
March 2012
, a special purpose entity formed for the purpose of issuing the notes and subsequently merged into UR
NA ("Funding SPV") i
ssued $
750
aggregate principal amount of 5
3
/
4
percent Senior Secured Notes (the “5
3
/
4
percent Notes”) which are due
July 15, 2018
. The net proceeds from the sale of the 5
3
/
4
percent Notes were approximately $
733
(after deducting the initial purchasers' fees and offering expenses). Upon consummation of the RSC
19
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
merger, URNA assumed the 5
3
/
4
percent Notes. The 5
3
/
4
percent Notes are secured and are guaranteed by Holdings and, subject to limited exceptions, URNA's domestic subsidiaries. The 5
3
/
4
percent Notes may be redeemed on or after
July 15, 2015
, at specified redemption prices that range from
102.875
percent in the 12-month period commencing on
July 15, 2015
, to
100 percent
in the 12-month period commencing on
July 15, 2017
and thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The indenture governing the 5
3
/
4
percent Notes contains certain restrictive covenants, including, among others, limitations on (1) liens; (2) additional indebtedness; (3) mergers, consolidations and acquisitions; (4) sales, transfers and other dispositions of assets; (5) loans and other investments; (6) dividends and other distributions, stock repurchases and redemptions and other restricted payments; (7) restrictions affecting subsidiaries; (8) transactions with affiliates; and (9) designations of unrestricted subsidiaries, as well as a requirement to timely file periodic reports with the SEC. The indenture also includes covenants relating to the grant of and maintenance of liens for the benefit of the notes collateral agent. Each of these covenants is subject to important exceptions and qualifications that would allow URI to engage in these activities under certain conditions. The indenture also requires that, in the event of a change of control (as defined in the indenture), URI must make an offer to purchase all of the then-outstanding 5
3
/
4
percent Notes tendered at a purchase price in cash equal to
101 percent
of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon.
7
3
/
8
percent Senior Notes
. In
March 2012
, Funding SPV issued $
750
aggregate principal amount of 7
3
/
8
percent Senior Notes (the “7
3
/
8
percent Notes”) which are due
May 15, 2020
. The net proceeds from the sale of the 7
3
/
8
percent Notes were approximately $
732
(after deducting the initial purchasers' fees and offering expenses). Upon consummation of the RSC merger, URNA assumed the 7
3
/
8
percent Notes. The 7
3
/
8
percent Notes are unsecured and are guaranteed by Holdings and, subject to limited exceptions, URNA's domestic subsidiaries. The 7
3
/
8
percent Notes may be redeemed on or after
May 15, 2016
, at specified redemption prices that range from
103.688
percent in the 12-month period commencing on
May 15, 2016
, to
100 percent
in the 12-month period commencing on
May 15, 2018
and thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The indenture governing the 7
3
/
8
percent Notes contains certain restrictive covenants, including, among others, limitations on (1) liens; (2) additional indebtedness; (3) mergers, consolidations and acquisitions; (4) sales, transfers and other dispositions of assets; (5) loans and other investments; (6) dividends and other distributions, stock repurchases and redemptions and other restricted payments; (7) restrictions affecting subsidiaries; (8) transactions with affiliates; and (9) designations of unrestricted subsidiaries, as well as a requirement to timely file periodic reports with the SEC. Each of these covenants is subject to important exceptions and qualifications that would allow URI to engage in these activities under certain conditions. The indenture also requires that, in the event of a change of control (as defined in the indenture), URI must make an offer to purchase all of the then-outstanding 7
3
/
8
percent Notes tendered at a purchase price in cash equal to
101 percent
of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon.
7
5
/
8
percent Senior Notes
. In
March 2012
, Funding SPV issued $
1,325
aggregate principal amount of 7
5
/
8
percent Senior Notes (the “7
5
/
8
percent Notes”) which are due
April 15, 2022
. The net proceeds from the sale of the 7
5
/
8
percent Notes were approximately $
1,295
(after deducting the initial purchasers' fees and offering expenses). Upon consummation of the RSC merger, URNA assumed the 7
5
/
8
percent Notes. The 7
5
/
8
percent Notes are unsecured and are guaranteed by Holdings and, subject to limited exceptions, URNA's domestic subsidiaries. The 7
5
/
8
percent Notes may be redeemed on or after
April 15, 2017
, at specified redemption prices that range from
103.813
percent in the 12-month period commencing on
April 15, 2017
, to
100 percent
in the 12-month period commencing on
April 15, 2020
and thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The indenture governing the 7
5
/
8
percent Notes contains certain restrictive covenants, including, among others, limitations on (1) liens; (2) additional indebtedness; (3) mergers, consolidations and acquisitions; (4) sales, transfers and other dispositions of assets; (5) loans and other investments; (6) dividends and other distributions, stock repurchases and redemptions and other restricted payments; (7) restrictions affecting subsidiaries; (8) transactions with affiliates; and (9) designations of unrestricted subsidiaries, as well as a requirement to timely file periodic reports with the SEC. Each of these covenants is subject to important exceptions and qualifications that would allow URI to engage in these activities under certain conditions. The indenture also requires that, in the event of a change of control (as defined in the indenture), URI must make an offer to purchase all of the then-outstanding 7
5
/
8
percent Notes tendered at a purchase price in cash equal to
101 percent
of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon.
Convertible Note Hedge Transactions
In connection with the November 2009 issuance of
$173
aggregate principal amount of
4 percent
Convertible Senior Notes, Holdings entered into convertible note hedge transactions with option counterparties. The convertible note hedge transactions cost
$26
, and decreased additional paid-in capital by
$17
, net of taxes, in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity (deficit). The convertible note hedge transactions cover, subject to anti-dilution adjustments,
15.1 million
shares of our common stock. The convertible note hedge transactions are intended to reduce, subject to a limit, the potential dilution with respect to our common stock upon conversion of the
4 percent
Convertible Senior Notes. The effect of the convertible note hedge transactions is to increase the effective conversion price to
$15.56
per share, equal to
20
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
an approximately
75 percent
premium over the
$8.89
closing price of our common stock at issuance. The effective conversion price is subject to change in certain circumstances, such as if the
4 percent
Convertible Senior Notes are converted prior to
May 15, 2015
. In the event the market value of our common stock exceeds the effective conversion price per share, the settlement amount received from such transactions will only partially offset the potential dilution. For example, if, at the time of exercise of the conversion right, the price of our common stock was
$35.00
or
$40.00
per share, assuming an effective conversion price of
$15.56
per share, on a net basis, we would issue
8.4 million
or
9.2 million
shares, respectively.
Loan Covenants and Compliance
As of
June 30, 2012
, we were in compliance with the covenants and other provisions of the ABL facility, the accounts receivable securitization facility, the senior notes and the QUIPS. Any failure to be in compliance with any material provision or covenant of these agreements could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and operations.
In October 2011, we amended the ABL facility. In March 2012, the size of the ABL facility was increased to
$1.9 billion
. The only material financial covenants which currently exist relate to the fixed charge coverage ratio and the senior secured leverage ratio under the ABL facility. Since the October 2011 amendment of the facility and through
June 30, 2012
, availability under the ABL facility has exceeded the required threshold and, as a result, these maintenance covenants have been inapplicable. Subject to certain limited exceptions specified in the amended ABL facility, the fixed charge coverage ratio and the senior secured leverage ratio under the amended ABL facility will only apply in the future if availability under the amended ABL facility falls below the greater of
10 percent
of the maximum revolver amount under the amended ABL facility and
$150
. Under our accounts receivable securitization facility, we are required, among other things, to maintain certain financial tests relating to: (i) the default ratio, (ii) the delinquency ratio, (iii) the dilution ratio and (iv) days sales outstanding.
9
. Legal and Regulatory Matters
On December 28, 2011, a complaint was filed in Arizona Superior Court, captioned Israni v. RSC Holdings Inc., CV20 11-020579, on behalf of a putative class of RSC's stockholders against RSC, each member of the RSC board, certain of RSC's officers, and the Company challenging the merger. In an amended complaint, filed February 24, 2012, plaintiff alleges, among other things, that the directors and officers of RSC breached their fiduciary duties by allegedly agreeing to sell RSC at an unfair and inadequate price and by allegedly failing to take steps to maximize the sale price of RSC. The complaint also alleges that RSC and the Company aided and abetted in the directors' and officers' breach of their fiduciary duties, and that the defendants' public disclosures concerning the merger have been inaccurate or incomplete. On April 19, 2012, without agreeing that any of the claims have merit, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the action, pursuant to which RSC and the Company agreed to make certain additional public disclosures regarding the merger and to pay certain attorneys' fees, if any, awarded by the court. The settlement is contingent upon, among other things, execution of definitive documentation and court approval. The Company continues to deny any liability with respect to the facts and claims alleged in the litigation.
As previously reported, following our August 2004 announcement that the SEC had commenced a non-public, fact-finding inquiry concerning the Company, an alleged stockholder filed an action in Connecticut State Superior Court, Judicial District of Norwalk/Stamford at Stamford, purportedly suing derivatively on the Company's behalf. The action, entitled Gregory Riegel v. John N. Milne, et al., named as defendants certain of our current and/or former directors and/or officers, and named the Company as a nominal defendant. The complaint asserted, among other things, that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company by causing or allowing the Company to disseminate misleading and inaccurate information to stockholders and the market and by failing to establish and maintain adequate accounting controls, thus exposing the Company to damages. The parties to the Riegel action agreed that the proceedings in this action would be stayed pending the resolution of the motions to dismiss in certain previously-filed purported stockholder class actions. As previously reported, those purported stockholder class actions were commenced in 2004 and were dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to a stipulation of settlement in May 2009. We previously announced on September 8, 2008 that we had also reached a final settlement with the SEC of its inquiry. On or about July 6, 2012, plaintiff withdrew this action against all defendants.
In addition to these matters and the other disclosures provided in note 15 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2011
filed on Form 10-K on January 25, 2012, we are also subject to a number of claims and proceedings that generally arise in the ordinary conduct of our business. These matters include, but are not limited to, general liability claims (including personal injury, product liability, and property and auto claims), indemnification and guarantee obligations, employee injuries and employment-related claims, self-insurance obligations and contract and real estate matters. Based on advice of counsel and available information, including current status or stage of proceeding, and taking into account accruals for matters where we have established them, we currently believe that any liabilities ultimately resulting from these ordinary course claims and proceedings will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our
21
Table of Contents
consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
22
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
10
. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic (loss) earnings per share is computed by dividing net (loss) income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted (loss) earnings per share is computed by dividing net (loss) income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted (loss) earnings per share for the three months ended
June 30, 2012
and
2011
excludes the impact of approximately
13.5 million
and
2.1 million
common stock equivalents, respectively, since the effect of including these securities would be anti-dilutive. Diluted (loss) earnings per share for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and
2011
excludes the impact of approximately
14.0 million
and
3.6 million
common stock equivalents, respectively, since the effect of including these securities would be anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share (shares in thousands):
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Numerator:
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(52
)
$
28
$
(39
)
$
8
Convertible debt interest—1
7
/
8
percent notes
—
—
—
—
(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common stockholders
$
(52
)
$
28
$
(39
)
$
8
Loss from discontinued operation
—
(1
)
—
(1
)
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders
$
(52
)
$
27
$
(39
)
$
7
Denominator:
Denominator for basic (loss) earnings per share—weighted-average common shares
83,231
62,479
73,181
61,669
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options and warrants
—
914
—
1,537
Convertible subordinated notes—1
7
/
8
percent
—
1,015
—
—
Convertible subordinated notes—4 percent
—
9,080
—
9,377
Restricted stock units
—
564
—
710
Denominator for diluted (loss) earnings per share—adjusted weighted-average common shares
83,231
74,052
73,181
73,293
Basic (loss) earnings per share:
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(0.63
)
$
0.45
$
(0.53
)
$
0.12
Loss from discontinued operation
—
(0.01
)
—
(0.01
)
Net (loss) income
$
(0.63
)
$
0.44
$
(0.53
)
$
0.11
Diluted (loss) earnings per share:
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(0.63
)
$
0.38
$
(0.53
)
$
0.10
Loss from discontinued operation
—
(0.01
)
—
(0.01
)
Net (loss) income
$
(0.63
)
$
0.37
$
(0.53
)
$
0.09
23
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
11
. Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor Subsidiaries
URNA is
100 percent
owned by Holdings (“Parent”) and has outstanding (i) certain indebtedness that is guaranteed by Parent, (ii) certain indebtedness that is guaranteed by both Parent and, with the exception of its U.S. special purpose vehicle which holds receivable assets relating to the Company’s accounts receivable securitization (the “SPV”), all of URNA’s U.S. subsidiaries (the “guarantor subsidiaries”) and (iii) certain indebtedness that is guaranteed by the guarantor subsidiaries. However, this indebtedness is not guaranteed by URNA’s foreign subsidiaries and the SPV (together, the “non-guarantor subsidiaries”). The guarantor subsidiaries are all
100 percent
-owned and the guarantees are made on a joint and several basis. The guarantees are not full and unconditional because a guarantor subsidiary can be automatically released and relieved of its obligations under certain circumstances, including sale of the subsidiary guarantor, the sale of all or substantially all of the subsidiary guarantor's assets, the requirements for legal defeasance or covenant defeasance under the applicable indenture being met or designating the subsidiary guarantor as an unrestricted subsidiary for purposes of the applicable covenants. The guarantees are also subject to subordination provisions (to the same extent that the obligations of the issuer under the relevant notes are subordinated to other debt of the issuer) and to a standard limitation which provides that the maximum amount guaranteed by each guarantor will not exceed the maximum amount that can be guaranteed without making the guarantee void under fraudulent conveyance laws. Based on our understanding of Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X ("Rule 3-10"), we believe that the guarantees of the guarantor subsidiaries comply with the conditions set forth in Rule 3-10 and therefore continue to utilize Rule 3-10 to present condensed consolidating financial information for Holdings, URNA, the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries. Separate consolidated financial statements of the guarantor subsidiaries have not been presented because management believes that such information would not be material to investors. However, condensed consolidating financial information is presented. The condensed consolidating financial information of Parent and its subsidiaries is as follows:
24
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
June 30, 2012
Parent
URNA
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Total
Foreign
SPV
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
$
—
$
14
$
—
$
27
$
—
$
—
$
41
Accounts receivable, net
—
17
—
106
581
—
704
Intercompany receivable (payable)
72
2
(64
)
(155
)
(1
)
146
—
Inventory
—
88
—
14
—
—
102
Prepaid expenses and other assets
—
95
1
10
—
—
106
Deferred taxes
—
64
—
2
—
—
66
Total current assets
72
280
(63
)
4
580
146
1,019
Rental equipment, net
—
4,493
—
602
—
—
5,095
Property and equipment, net
43
322
20
34
—
—
419
Investments in subsidiaries
1,517
764
494
—
—
(2,775
)
—
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
—
4,273
—
8
—
—
4,281
Other long-term assets
5
122
—
1
—
—
128
Total assets
$
1,637
$
10,254
$
451
$
649
$
580
$
(2,629
)
$
10,942
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
$
133
$
35
$
—
$
1
$
252
$
—
$
421
Accounts payable
—
549
—
56
—
—
605
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
1
342
22
30
—
—
395
Total current liabilities
134
926
22
87
252
—
1,421
Long-term debt
—
6,725
139
4
—
—
6,868
Subordinated convertible debentures
55
—
—
—
—
—
55
Deferred taxes
17
1,027
—
62
—
—
1,106
Other long-term liabilities
1
59
—
2
—
—
62
Total liabilities
207
8,737
161
155
252
—
9,512
Temporary equity (note 8)
35
—
—
—
—
—
35
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
1,395
1,517
290
494
328
(2,629
)
1,395
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
$
1,637
$
10,254
$
451
$
649
$
580
$
(2,629
)
$
10,942
25
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2011
Parent
URNA
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Total
Foreign
SPV
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
$
—
$
6
$
—
$
30
$
—
$
—
$
36
Accounts receivable, net
—
19
9
98
338
—
464
Intercompany receivable (payable)
114
(876
)
772
(154
)
—
144
—
Inventory
—
21
15
8
—
—
44
Prepaid expenses and other assets
—
55
1
19
—
—
75
Deferred taxes
—
100
3
1
—
—
104
Total current assets
114
(675
)
800
2
338
144
723
Rental equipment, net
—
1,345
836
436
—
—
2,617
Property and equipment, net
41
177
120
28
—
—
366
Investments in subsidiaries
227
2,144
462
—
—
(2,833
)
—
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
—
130
102
140
—
—
372
Other long-term assets
4
60
1
—
—
—
65
Total assets
$
386
$
3,181
$
2,321
$
606
$
338
$
(2,689
)
$
4,143
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt
$
129
$
8
$
—
$
3
$
255
$
—
$
395
Accounts payable
—
120
47
39
—
—
206
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
31
139
48
45
—
—
263
Total current liabilities
160
267
95
87
255
—
864
Long-term debt
—
2,444
142
6
—
—
2,592
Subordinated convertible debentures
55
—
—
—
—
—
55
Deferred taxes
16
241
165
48
—
—
470
Other long-term liabilities
52
2
2
3
—
—
59
Total liabilities
283
2,954
404
144
255
—
4,040
Temporary equity (note 8)
39
—
—
—
—
—
39
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
64
227
1,917
462
83
(2,689
)
64
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
$
386
$
3,181
$
2,321
$
606
$
338
$
(2,689
)
$
4,143
26
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2012
Parent
URNA
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Total
Foreign
SPV (1)
Revenues:
Equipment rentals
$
—
$
665
$
66
$
114
$
—
$
—
$
845
Sales of rental equipment
—
66
6
9
—
—
81
Sales of new equipment
—
13
2
7
—
—
22
Contractor supplies sales
—
16
2
5
—
—
23
Service and other revenues
—
14
3
5
—
—
22
Total revenues
—
774
79
140
—
—
993
Cost of revenues:
Cost of equipment rentals, excluding depreciation
—
272
29
49
—
—
350
Depreciation of rental equipment
—
136
13
23
—
—
172
Cost of rental equipment sales
—
47
4
5
—
—
56
Cost of new equipment sales
—
10
2
5
—
—
17
Cost of contractor supplies sales
—
12
1
3
—
—
16
Cost of service and other revenues
—
4
1
3
—
—
8
Total cost of revenues
—
481
50
88
—
—
619
Gross profit
—
293
29
52
—
—
374
Selling, general and administrative expenses
9
104
11
17
5
—
146
RSC merger related costs
—
80
—
—
—
—
80
Restructuring charge
—
52
—
1
—
—
53
Non-rental depreciation and amortization
3
41
1
4
—
—
49
Operating (loss) income
(12
)
16
17
30
(5
)
—
46
Interest expense (income), net
3
68
32
1
18
(1
)
121
Interest expense-subordinated convertible debentures
1
—
—
—
—
—
1
Other (income) expense, net
(20
)
14
—
4
(10
)
—
(12
)
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
4
(66
)
(15
)
25
(13
)
1
(64
)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
1
(3
)
(11
)
6
(5
)
—
(12
)
Income (loss) before equity in net (loss) earnings of subsidiaries
3
(63
)
(4
)
19
(8
)
1
(52
)
Equity in net (loss) earnings of subsidiaries
(55
)
8
19
—
—
28
—
Net (loss) income
(52
)
(55
)
15
19
(8
)
29
(52
)
Other comprehensive (loss) income
(12
)
(12
)
(10
)
(6
)
—
28
(12
)
Comprehensive (loss) income
$
(64
)
$
(67
)
$
5
$
13
$
(8
)
$
57
$
(64
)
(1)
Includes interest expense prior to the
April 30, 2012
RSC acquisition date on the merger financing debt issued by Funding SPV, as discussed further in note
8
to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
27
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2011
Parent
URNA
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Total
Foreign
SPV
Revenues:
Equipment rentals
$
—
$
256
$
178
$
90
$
—
$
—
$
524
Sales of rental equipment
—
23
12
6
—
—
41
Sales of new equipment
—
11
5
5
—
—
21
Contractor supplies sales
—
9
7
6
—
—
22
Service and other revenues
—
10
6
5
—
—
21
Total revenues
—
309
208
112
—
—
629
Cost of revenues:
Cost of equipment rentals, excluding depreciation
—
117
87
42
—
—
246
Depreciation of rental equipment
—
55
33
15
—
—
103
Cost of rental equipment sales
—
16
9
3
—
—
28
Cost of new equipment sales
—
8
4
5
—
—
17
Cost of contractor supplies sales
—
7
5
4
—
—
16
Cost of service and other revenues
—
3
2
3
—
—
8
Total cost of revenues
—
206
140
72
—
—
418
Gross profit
—
103
68
40
—
—
211
Selling, general and administrative expenses
8
32
34
20
6
—
100
Restructuring charge
—
2
—
—
—
—
2
Non-rental depreciation and amortization
4
4
5
1
—
—
14
Operating (loss) income
(12
)
65
29
19
(6
)
—
95
Interest expense (income), net
3
53
1
1
1
(2
)
57
Interest expense-subordinated convertible debentures
2
—
—
—
—
—
2
Other (income) expense, net
(17
)
11
9
3
(9
)
—
(3
)
Income before provision (benefit) for income taxes
—
1
19
15
2
2
39
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
—
11
(6
)
7
(1
)
—
11
(Loss) income from continuing operations
—
(10
)
25
8
3
2
28
Loss from discontinued operation, net of taxes
—
(1
)
—
—
—
—
(1
)
(Loss) income before equity in net earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
—
(11
)
25
8
3
2
27
Equity in net earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
27
38
10
—
—
(75
)
—
Net income (loss)
27
27
35
8
3
(73
)
27
Other comprehensive income (loss)
1
1
2
1
—
(4
)
1
Comprehensive income (loss)
$
28
$
28
$
37
$
9
$
3
$
(77
)
$
28
28
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2012
Parent
URNA
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Total
Foreign
SPV (1)
Revenues:
Equipment rentals
$
—
$
915
$
249
$
204
$
—
$
—
$
1,368
Sales of rental equipment
—
105
32
20
—
—
157
Sales of new equipment
—
21
7
12
—
—
40
Contractor supplies sales
—
24
7
10
—
—
41
Service and other revenues
—
25
8
10
—
—
43
Total revenues
—
1,090
303
256
—
—
1,649
Cost of revenues:
Cost of equipment rentals, excluding depreciation
—
387
117
92
—
—
596
Depreciation of rental equipment
—
195
50
42
—
—
287
Cost of rental equipment sales
—
71
20
12
—
—
103
Cost of new equipment sales
—
17
6
9
—
—
32
Cost of contractor supplies sales
—
16
5
7
—
—
28
Cost of service and other revenues
—
10
3
3
—
—
16
Total cost of revenues
—
696
201
165
—
—
1,062
Gross profit
—
394
102
91
—
—
587
Selling, general and administrative expenses
19
138
47
34
10
—
248
RSC merger related costs
—
90
—
—
—
—
90
Restructuring charge
—
52
—
1
—
—
53
Non-rental depreciation and amortization
7
45
5
6
—
—
63
Operating (loss) income
(26
)
69
50
50
(10
)
—
133
Interest expense (income), net
6
119
33
2
31
(2
)
189
Interest expense-subordinated convertible debentures
2
—
—
—
—
—
2
Other (income) expense, net
(38
)
30
9
7
(21
)
—
(13
)
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
4
(80
)
8
41
(20
)
2
(45
)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
1
(25
)
17
9
(8
)
—
(6
)
Income (loss) before equity in net (loss) earnings of subsidiaries
3
(55
)
(9
)
32
(12
)
2
(39
)
Equity in net (loss) earnings of subsidiaries
(42
)
13
33
—
—
(4
)
—
Net (loss) income
(39
)
(42
)
24
32
(12
)
(2
)
(39
)
Other comprehensive (loss) income
(2
)
(2
)
(1
)
(1
)
—
4
(2
)
Comprehensive (loss) income
$
(41
)
$
(44
)
$
23
$
31
$
(12
)
$
2
$
(41
)
(1)
Includes interest expense prior to the
April 30, 2012
RSC acquisition date on the merger financing debt issued by Funding SPV, as discussed further in note
8
to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
29
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
Parent
URNA
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Total
Foreign
SPV
Revenues:
Equipment rentals
$
—
$
472
$
327
$
159
$
—
$
—
$
958
Sales of rental equipment
—
41
21
11
—
—
73
Sales of new equipment
—
17
9
10
—
—
36
Contractor supplies sales
—
18
13
12
—
—
43
Service and other revenues
—
22
11
9
—
—
42
Total revenues
—
570
381
201
—
—
1,152
Cost of revenues:
Cost of equipment rentals, excluding depreciation
—
234
168
77
—
—
479
Depreciation of rental equipment
—
108
66
28
—
—
202
Cost of rental equipment sales
—
26
14
6
—
—
46
Cost of new equipment sales
—
14
7
8
—
—
29
Cost of contractor supplies sales
—
13
9
8
—
—
30
Cost of service and other revenues
—
9
4
4
—
—
17
Total cost of revenues
—
404
268
131
—
—
803
Gross profit
—
166
113
70
—
—
349
Selling, general and administrative expenses
13
71
65
35
11
—
195
Restructuring charge
—
2
1
—
—
—
3
Non-rental depreciation and amortization
7
8
9
2
—
—
26
Operating (loss) income
(20
)
85
38
33
(11
)
—
125
Interest expense (income), net
6
104
3
1
2
(3
)
113
Interest expense-subordinated convertible debentures
4
—
—
—
—
—
4
Other (income) expense, net
(32
)
25
15
6
(18
)
—
(4
)
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
2
(44
)
20
26
5
3
12
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
—
2
(6
)
9
(1
)
—
4
Income (loss) from continuing operations
2
(46
)
26
17
6
3
8
Loss from discontinued operation, net of taxes
—
(1
)
—
—
—
—
(1
)
Income (loss) before equity in net earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
2
(47
)
26
17
6
3
7
Equity in net earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
5
52
20
—
—
(77
)
—
Net income (loss)
7
5
46
17
6
(74
)
7
Other comprehensive income (loss)
13
13
13
6
—
(32
)
13
Comprehensive income (loss)
$
20
$
18
$
59
$
23
$
6
$
(106
)
$
20
30
Table of Contents
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING CASH FLOW INFORMATION
For the
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2012
Parent
URNA
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Total
Foreign
SPV
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
7
$
359
$
150
$
62
$
(236
)
$
—
$
342
Net cash used in investing activities
(7
)
(1,675
)
(152
)
(60
)
—
—
(1,894
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
—
1,324
2
(5
)
236
—
1,557
Effect of foreign exchange rates
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
—
8
—
(3
)
—
—
5
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
—
6
—
30
—
—
36
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
—
$
14
$
—
$
27
$
—
$
—
$
41
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING CASH FLOW INFORMATION
For the
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
Parent
URNA
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Total
Foreign
SPV
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
$
6
$
121
$
136
$
41
$
(8
)
$
—
$
296
Net cash used in investing activities
(6
)
(159
)
(138
)
(184
)
—
—
(487
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
—
37
2
(8
)
8
—
39
Effect of foreign exchange rates
—
—
—
7
—
—
7
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
—
(1
)
—
(144
)
—
—
(145
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
—
4
—
199
—
—
203
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
—
$
3
$
—
$
55
$
—
$
—
$
58
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in millions, except per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
Executive Overview
We are the largest equipment rental company in the world, with an integrated network of
969
rental locations in the United States and Canada. Although the equipment rental industry is highly fragmented and diverse, we believe that we are well positioned to take advantage of this environment because, as a larger company, we have more extensive resources and certain competitive advantages. These include a fleet of rental equipment with a total original equipment cost (“OEC”) of $
7.3 billion
, and a national branch network that operates in 48 states and every Canadian province, and serves 99 of the largest 100 metropolitan areas in the United States. In addition, our size gives us greater purchasing power, the ability to provide customers with a broader range of equipment and services, the ability to provide customers with equipment that is better maintained and therefore more productive and reliable, and the ability to enhance the earning potential of our assets by transferring equipment among branches to satisfy customer needs.
We offer approximately
3,400
classes of equipment for rent to a diverse customer base that includes construction and
31
Table of Contents
industrial companies, manufacturers, utilities, municipalities, homeowners and government entities. Our revenues are derived from the following sources: equipment rentals, sales of rental equipment, sales of new equipment, contractor supplies sales and service and other revenues. Equipment rentals represented
83
percent of total revenues for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
.
For the past several years, we have focused on optimizing the profitability of our core rental business through revenue growth and margin expansion. To achieve this, we have developed a strategy focused on customer segmentation, rate management, fleet management and disciplined cost control. Additionally, we are continuing to strengthen our competitiveness through customer service excellence. This strategy calls for a superior standard of service to customers, often provided through a single point of contact; an increasing proportion of revenues derived from larger accounts; and a targeted presence in industrial and specialty markets.
On
April 30, 2012
(“the acquisition date”), we acquired
100
percent of the outstanding common shares and voting interest of RSC Holdings, Inc. (“RSC”). The results of RSC's operations have been included in the condensed consolidated financial statements since that date. RSC was one of the largest equipment rental providers in North America, and had a network of
440
rental locations in
43
U.S. states and three Canadian provinces as of
December 31, 2011
. We believe that the acquisition will create a leading North American equipment rental company with a more attractive business mix, greater scale and enhanced growth prospects, and that the acquisition will provide us with financial benefits including reduced operating expenses and additional revenue opportunities. For additional information concerning the RSC acquisition, see note
2
to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
During the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, year over year, our rental rates increased
7.4
percent and the volume of OEC on rent increased
42.9
percent, which we believe reflects, in addition to the impact of the RSC acquisition, modest improvements in our operating environment, a secular shift from ownership to the rental of construction-related equipment, and our increased focus on National Accounts and other large customers. National Accounts are generally defined as customers with potential annual equipment rental spend of at least $500,000 (actual dollars) or customers doing business in multiple locations. Although there is no certainty that these trends will continue, we believe that our strategy will strengthen our leadership position in a recovery.
Financial Overview
(Loss) income from continuing operations.
(Loss) income from continuing operations and diluted (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and
2011
were as follows:
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
(Loss) income from continuing operations
$
(52
)
$
28
$
(39
)
$
8
Diluted (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations
$
(0.63
)
$
0.38
$
(0.53
)
$
0.10
(Loss) income from continuing operations and diluted (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and
2011
include the impacts of the following special items (amounts presented on an after-tax basis):
32
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Contribution
to loss from continuing operations (after-tax)
Impact on
diluted loss per share from continuing operations
Contribution
to income from continuing operations (after-tax)
Impact on
diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
Contribution
to loss from continuing operations (after-tax)
Impact on
diluted loss per share from continuing operations
Contribution
to income from continuing operations (after-tax)
Impact on
diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
RSC merger related costs (1)
$
(49
)
$
(0.60
)
$
—
$
—
$
(55
)
$
(0.76
)
$
—
$
—
RSC merger related intangible asset amortization (2)
(18
)
(0.21
)
—
—
(18
)
(0.24
)
—
—
Impact on rental depreciation related to acquired RSC fleet (3)
2
0.02
—
—
2
0.02
—
—
Impact on used equipment cost of sales related to fair value mark-up of acquired RSC fleet (4)
(4
)
(0.05
)
—
—
(4
)
(0.05
)
—
—
Pre-close RSC merger related interest expense (5)
(10
)
(0.12
)
—
—
(18
)
(0.25
)
—
—
Impact on interest expense related to fair value adjustment of acquired RSC indebtedness (6)
1
0.01
—
—
1
0.01
—
—
Restructuring charge (7)
(33
)
(0.39
)
(1
)
(0.01
)
(33
)
(0.44
)
(2
)
(0.02
)
Asset impairment charge (8)
(2
)
(0.02
)
(1
)
(0.01
)
(2
)
(0.02
)
(1
)
(0.01
)
Loss on repurchase/redemption of debt securities and retirement of subordinated convertible debentures
—
—
—
—
—
—
*
(0.01
)
Gain on sale of software subsidiary (9)
6
0.07
—
—
6
0.08
—
—
*
Amount is less than $1.
(1)
This reflects transaction costs associated with the acquisition of RSC discussed in note
2
to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
(2)
This reflects the amortization of the intangible assets acquired in the RSC acquisition.
(3)
This reflects the impact of extending the useful lives of equipment acquired in the RSC acquisition, net of the impact of additional depreciation associated with the fair value mark-up of such equipment.
(4)
This reflects additional costs recorded in cost of rental equipment sales associated with the fair value mark-up of rental equipment acquired in the RSC acquisition. The costs relate to equipment acquired in the RSC acquisition and sold in the periods indicated.
(5)
As discussed in note
8
to our condensed consolidated financial statements, in
March 2012
, we issued $
2,825
of debt in connection with the RSC merger. The pre-close RSC merger related interest expense reflects the interest expense recorded on this debt prior to the acquisition date.
(6)
This reflects a reduction of interest expense associated with the fair value mark-up of debt acquired in the RSC acquisition. See note
8
to our condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail on the acquired debt.
(7)
As discussed below (see “Restructuring charge”), this primarily reflects severance costs and branch closure charges associated with the RSC merger.
(8)
This charge primarily reflects write-offs of leasehold improvements and other fixed assets.
(9)
This reflects a gain recognized upon the sale of a former subsidiary that developed and marketed software.
33
Table of Contents
In addition to the matters discussed above, our 2012 performance reflects increased gross profit from equipment rentals and sales of rental equipment. Additionally, during the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
we recognized a $9 benefit in cost of equipment rentals, excluding depreciation related to our provision for self-insurance reserves as compared to a benefit of $2 recognized during the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2011
. The three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
also include a deferred tax charge of $8 related to the RSC acquisition, after which, and with consideration to other tax items, the effective tax rates were
18.8
percent and
13.3
percent for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, respectively.
EBITDA GAAP Reconciliations.
EBITDA represents the sum of net (loss) income, loss from discontinued operation, net of taxes, (benefit) provision for income taxes, interest expense, net, interest expense-subordinated convertible debentures, depreciation of rental equipment and non-rental depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA plus the sum of the RSC merger related costs, restructuring charge, stock compensation expense, net, the impact on used equipment cost of sales related to the fair value mark-up of the acquired RSC fleet and the gain on sale of software subsidiary. These items are excluded from adjusted EBITDA internally when evaluating our operating performance and allow investors to make a more meaningful comparison between our core business operating results over different periods of time, as well as with those of other similar companies. Management believes that EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA, when viewed with the Company’s results under GAAP and the accompanying reconciliations, provide useful information about operating performance and period-over-period growth, and provide additional information that is useful for evaluating the operating performance of our core business without regard to potential distortions. Additionally, management believes that EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA permit investors to gain an understanding of the factors and trends affecting our ongoing cash earnings, from which capital investments are made and debt is serviced. However, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are not measures of financial performance or liquidity under GAAP and, accordingly, should not be considered as alternatives to net income (loss) or cash flow from operating activities as indicators of operating performance or liquidity.
The table below provides a reconciliation between net (loss) income and EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA:
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Net (loss) income
$
(52
)
$
27
$
(39
)
$
7
Loss from discontinued operation, net of taxes
—
1
—
1
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
(12
)
11
(6
)
4
Interest expense, net
121
57
189
113
Interest expense – subordinated convertible debentures
1
2
2
4
Depreciation of rental equipment
172
103
287
202
Non-rental depreciation and amortization
49
14
63
26
EBITDA
$
279
$
215
$
496
$
357
RSC merger related costs (1)
80
—
90
—
Restructuring charge (2)
53
2
53
3
Stock compensation expense, net (3)
9
4
13
6
Impact on used equipment cost of sales related to fair value mark-up of acquired RSC fleet (4)
7
—
7
—
Gain on sale of software subsidiary (5)
(10
)
—
(10
)
—
Adjusted EBITDA
$
418
$
221
$
649
$
366
The table below provides a reconciliation between net cash provided by operating activities and EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA:
34
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2012
2011
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
342
$
296
Adjustments for items included in net cash provided by operating activities but excluded from the calculation of EBITDA:
Loss from discontinued operation, net of taxes
—
1
Amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discounts
(12
)
(11
)
Gain on sales of rental equipment
54
27
Gain on sales of non-rental equipment
2
1
Gain on sale of software subsidiary (5)
10
—
RSC merger related costs (1)
(90
)
—
Restructuring charge (2)
(53
)
(3
)
Stock compensation expense, net (3)
(13
)
(6
)
Loss on retirement of subordinated convertible debentures
—
(1
)
Changes in assets and liabilities
98
(61
)
Cash paid for interest, including subordinated convertible debentures
134
98
Cash paid for income taxes, net
24
16
EBITDA
$
496
$
357
Add back:
RSC merger related costs (1)
90
—
Restructuring charge (2)
53
3
Stock compensation expense, net (3)
13
6
Impact on used equipment cost of sales related to fair value mark-up of acquired RSC fleet (4)
7
—
Gain on sale of software subsidiary (5)
(10
)
—
Adjusted EBITDA
$
649
$
366
___________________
(1)
This reflects transaction costs associated with the RSC acquisition discussed above.
(2)
As discussed below (see “Restructuring charge”), this primarily reflects severance costs and branch closure charges associated with the RSC merger.
(3)
Represents non-cash, share-based payments associated with the granting of equity instruments.
(4)
This reflects additional costs recorded in cost of rental equipment sales associated with the fair value mark-up of rental equipment acquired in the RSC acquisition. The costs relate to equipment acquired in the RSC acquisition and sold in the periods indicated.
(5)
This reflects a gain recognized upon the sale of a former subsidiary that developed and marketed software.
For the three months ended
June 30, 2012
, EBITDA increased $
64
, or
29.8
percent, and adjusted EBITDA increased
$197
, or
89.1
percent. The EBITDA increase primarily reflects increased profit from equipment rentals, partially offset by the impact of the RSC merger related costs and restructuring charge, and the adjusted EBITDA increase primarily reflects increased profit from equipment rentals. For the three months ended
June 30, 2012
, EBITDA margin decreased
6.1
percentage points to
28.1
percent, and adjusted EBITDA margin increased
7.0
percentage points to
42.1
percent. The decrease in EBITDA margin primarily reflects the impact of the RSC merger related costs and restructuring charge, partially offset by increased margins from equipment rentals and improved selling, general and administrative leverage. The increase in adjusted EBITDA margin primarily reflects increased margins from equipment rentals and improved selling, general and administrative leverage, partially offset by decreased margins from sales of rental equipment. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, EBITDA increased
$139
, or
38.9
percent, and adjusted EBITDA increased
$283
, or
77.3
percent. The EBITDA increase primarily reflects increased profit from equipment rentals, partially offset by the impact of the RSC merger related costs and restructuring charge, and the adjusted EBITDA increase primarily reflects increased profit from equipment rentals. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, EBITDA margin decreased
0.9
percentage points to
30.1
percent, and adjusted EBITDA margin increased
7.6
percentage points to
39.4
percent. The decrease in EBITDA margin primarily reflects the impact of the RSC merger related costs and restructuring charge, partially offset by increased margins from equipment rentals and improved selling, general and
35
Table of Contents
administrative leverage. The increase in adjusted EBITDA margin primarily reflects increased margins from equipment rentals and improved selling, general and administrative leverage, partially offset by decreased margins from sales of rental equipment.
Results of Operations
As discussed in note
3
to our condensed consolidated financial statements, our reportable segments are general rentals and trench safety, power and HVAC (“heating, ventilating and air conditioning”). The general rentals segment includes the rental of construction, aerial, industrial and homeowner equipment and related services and activities. The general rentals segment’s customers include construction and industrial companies, manufacturers, utilities, municipalities, homeowners and government entities. The general rentals segment operates throughout the United States and Canada. The trench safety, power and HVAC segment includes the rental of equipment for underground construction, temporary power, climate control and disaster recovery, and related services such as training. The trench safety, power and HVAC segment’s customers include construction companies involved in infrastructure projects, municipalities and industrial companies. The trench safety, power and HVAC segment operates throughout the United States and in Canada.
As discussed in note
3
to our condensed consolidated financial statements, we aggregate our
12
geographic regions—Eastern Canada, Gulf South, Industrial (which serves the geographic Gulf region and has a strong industrial presence), Mid-Atlantic, Mid-Central, Midwest, Mountain West, Northeast, Northwest, South, Southeast and Southwest—into our general rentals reporting segment. Historically, there have been variances in the levels of equipment rentals gross margins achieved by these regions. For instance, for the five year period ended
June 30, 2012
, certain of our regions had equipment rentals gross margins that varied by between 10 percent and
23
percent from the equipment rentals gross margins of the aggregated general rentals' regions over the same period. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, the aggregate general rentals' equipment rentals gross margin increased
7.0
percentage points to
34.8
percent, primarily reflecting increased rental rates, a
1.0
percentage point increase in time utilization, which is calculated by dividing the amount of time equipment is on rent by the amount of time we have owned the equipment, and cost improvements. As compared to the equipment rentals revenue increase of
42.9
percent, aggregate repairs and maintenance and delivery costs increased
30.9
percent due primarily to higher rental volume, compensation costs increased
28.1
percent due primarily to increased headcount associated with higher rental volume and the RSC acquisition, building and property costs increased
16.8
percent due primarily to the impact of the RSC acquisition and insurance decreased
26.0
percent due primarily to our provision for self-insurance reserves. Our equipment rental revenue increased more than our costs because rates—which were a significant driver of the year-over-year revenue improvement—result in fewer variable costs compared to utilization.
For the five year period ended
June 30, 2012
, the general rentals' region with the lowest equipment rentals gross margin was the
Southeast
. The
Southeast
region's equipment rentals gross margin of
26.0
percent for the five year period ended
June 30, 2012
was
23
percent less than the equipment rentals gross margins of the aggregated general rentals' regions over the same period. The
Southeast
region's equipment rentals gross margin was less than the other general rentals' regions during this period as it experienced more significant declines in its end markets than the other regions, which led to more competitive pricing pressure and lower fleet investment. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, the
Southeast
region's equipment rentals gross margin increased
5.9
percentage points to
30.9
percent, primarily reflecting a
5.6
percent rental rate increase and cost improvements, partially offset by a
0.9
percentage point decrease in time utilization. As compared to equipment rentals revenue, which increased 31.5 percent, depreciation of rental equipment increased 25.7 percent due primarily to an increase in average OEC, repairs and maintenance increased 11.6 percent due primarily to higher rental volume, compensation costs increased 24.6 percent, and building and property costs increased 14.3 percent. Rental rate changes are calculated based on the year over year variance in average contract rates, weighted by the prior period revenue mix. Rental rate calculations are only available on a pro forma basis (that is, including the results of operations of RSC for all periods presented).
For the five year period ended
June 30, 2012
, the general rentals' region with the highest equipment rentals gross margin was the
Northeast
. The
Northeast
region's equipment rentals gross margin of
36.9
percent for the five year period ended
June 30, 2012
was
13
percent more than the equipment rentals gross margins of the aggregated general rentals' regions over the same period. The
Northeast
region's equipment rentals gross margin was more than the other general rentals' regions during this period as its end markets were more stable than the other regions, which resulted in stronger pricing. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, the
Northeast
region's equipment rentals gross margin increased
3.8
percentage points to
36.0
percent, primarily reflecting an
8.7
percent rental rate increase and cost improvements, partially offset by a
1.6
percentage point decrease in time utilization. As compared to equipment rentals revenue, which increased 27.4 percent, aggregate repairs and maintenance and delivery costs increased 19.4 percent due primarily to higher rental volume, compensation costs increased 12.5 percent, and building and property costs increased 8.1 percent.
Although the margins for certain of our general rentals' regions exceeded a 10 percent variance level for the five year period ended
June 30, 2012
, we expect convergence going forward given management's focus on cost cutting, improved processes and fleet sharing. Although we believe aggregating these regions into our general rentals reporting segment for
36
Table of Contents
segment reporting purposes is appropriate, to the extent that the margin variances persist and the equipment rentals gross margins do not converge, we may be required to disaggregate the regions into separate reporting segments. Any such disaggregation would have no impact on our consolidated results of operations.
These segments align our external segment reporting with how management evaluates and allocates resources. We evaluate segment performance based on segment equipment rentals gross profit. Our revenues, operating results, and financial condition fluctuate from quarter to quarter reflecting the seasonal rental patterns of our customers, with rental activity tending to be lower in the winter.
Revenues by segment were as follows:
General
rentals
Trench safety,
power and HVAC
Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Equipment rentals
$
781
$
64
$
845
Sales of rental equipment
78
3
81
Sales of new equipment
20
2
22
Contractor supplies sales
21
2
23
Service and other revenues
21
1
22
Total revenue
$
921
$
72
$
993
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
Equipment rentals
$
479
$
45
$
524
Sales of rental equipment
40
1
41
Sales of new equipment
18
3
21
Contractor supplies sales
20
2
22
Service and other revenues
20
1
21
Total revenue
$
577
$
52
$
629
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Equipment rentals
$
1,256
$
112
$
1,368
Sales of rental equipment
152
5
157
Sales of new equipment
37
3
40
Contractor supplies sales
37
4
41
Service and other revenues
41
2
43
Total revenue
$
1,523
$
126
$
1,649
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Equipment rentals
$
879
$
79
$
958
Sales of rental equipment
70
3
73
Sales of new equipment
32
4
36
Contractor supplies sales
40
3
43
Service and other revenues
40
2
42
Total revenue
$
1,061
$
91
$
1,152
Equipment rentals
. For the three months ended
June 30, 2012
, equipment rentals of $
845
increased $
321
, or
61.3
percent, as compared to the same period in 2011, primarily reflecting a
63.7
percent increase in the volume of OEC on rent and a
7.4
percent rental rate increase, partially offset by changes in rental mix. There are two components of rental mix that impact equipment rentals: 1) the type of equipment rented and 2) the duration of the rental contract (daily, weekly and monthly). In 2012, we increased the portion of equipment rentals from monthly rental contracts, which results in equipment rentals increasing at a lesser rate than the volume of OEC on rent, but produces higher margins as there are less transaction costs. As discussed above, we acquired RSC on
April 30, 2012
, and the results of RSC's operations have been included in our condensed consolidated financial statements since that date. The impact of the RSC acquisition on equipment rentals is primarily reflected in the increase in the volume of OEC on rent. Equipment rentals represented
85
percent of total revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2012
. On a segment basis, equipment rentals represented
85
percent and
89
percent of total revenues for the
37
Table of Contents
three months ended
June 30, 2012
for general rentals and trench safety, power and HVAC, respectively. General rentals equipment rentals increased $
302
, or
63.0
percent, primarily reflecting a
63.8
percent increase in the volume of OEC on rent and increased rental rates, partially offset by an increase in the portion of equipment rentals from monthly rental contracts, which results in equipment rentals increasing at a lesser rate than the volume of OEC on rent. Trench safety, power and HVAC equipment rentals increased $
19
, or
42.2
percent, primarily reflecting an increase in the volume of OEC on rent. Trench safety, power and HVAC average OEC for the three months ended
June 30, 2012
increased
59
percent as compared to the same period in 2011. Capitalizing on the demand for the higher margin equipment rented by our trench safety, power and HVAC segment has been a key component of our strategy in 2012 and 2011. The trench safety, power and HVAC equipment rentals growth was less than the increase in average OEC primarily due to OEC mix, as a significant portion of the OEC growth was in product lines that generate less revenue per OEC dollar, such as power and HVAC equipment. Our revenues fluctuate from quarter to quarter reflecting the seasonal rental patterns of our customers, with rental activity tending to be lower in the winter.
For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, equipment rentals of $
1,368
increased $
410
, or
42.8
percent, as compared to the same period in 2011, primarily reflecting a
42.9
percent increase in the volume of OEC on rent and a
7.4
percent rental rate increase, partially offset by an increase in the portion of equipment rentals from monthly rental contracts, which results in equipment rentals increasing at a lesser rate than the volume of OEC on rent. Equipment rentals represented
83
percent of total revenues for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
. On a segment basis, equipment rentals represented
82
percent and
89
percent of total revenues for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
for general rentals and trench safety, power and HVAC, respectively. General rentals equipment rentals increased $
377
, or
42.9
percent, primarily reflecting a
42.2
percent increase in the volume of OEC on rent and increased rental rates, partially offset by an increase in the portion of equipment rentals from monthly rental contracts, which results in equipment rentals increasing at a lesser rate than the volume of OEC on rent. Trench safety, power and HVAC equipment rentals increased $
33
, or
41.8
percent, primarily reflecting an increase in the volume of OEC on rent. Trench safety, power and HVAC average OEC for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
increased
62
percent as compared to the same period in 2011. The trench safety, power and HVAC equipment rentals growth was less than the increase in average OEC primarily due to OEC mix, as a significant portion of the OEC growth was in product lines that generate less revenue per OEC dollar, such as power and HVAC equipment.
We believe that the rate and volume improvements for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
reflect, in addition to the impact of the RSC acquisition, a combination of the following factors: a modest improvement in our operating environment; a shift from customer ownership to the rental of construction equipment; and the benefit of our strategy, particularly our increased focus on National Accounts and other large customers that tend to rent more equipment for longer periods of time. As discussed above, the results of RSC's operations have been included in our condensed consolidated financial statements since the
April 30, 2012
acquisition date. The RSC acquisition contributed to the volume improvements for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
. The total OEC of our fleet of rental equipment was $
7.3 billion
, including the acquired RSC fleet, as of
June 30, 2012
as compared to $4.0 billion as of December 31, 2011.
Sales of rental equipment
. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, sales of rental equipment represented approximately
10
percent of our total revenues. Our general rentals segment accounted for substantially all of these sales. For the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, sales of rental equipment increased
97.6
percent and
115.1
percent, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011, primarily reflecting increased volume and improved pricing in a stronger retail market and the impact of the RSC acquisition. The increased sales also reflect management of our fleet size and mix in anticipation of increased rental capital expenditures in 2012. For the full year 2012, we expect gross rental capital expenditures of between $
1.3
billion and $
1.4
billion.
Sales of new equipment.
For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, sales of new equipment represented approximately
2
percent of our total revenues. Our general rentals segment accounted for substantially all of these sales. For the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, sales of new equipment increased
4.8
percent and
11.1
percent, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011, primarily reflecting changes in the mix of equipment sold. In 2012, we sold a larger proportion of higher cost equipment, such as forklifts and large boom lifts, which generate more revenue per unit sold.
Contractor supplies sales.
Contractor supplies sales represent our revenues associated with selling a variety of supplies, including construction consumables, tools, small equipment and safety supplies. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, contractor supplies sales represented approximately
2
percent of our total revenues. Our general rentals segment accounted for substantially all of these sales. For the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, contractor supplies sales
increased
4.5
percent and
decreased
4.7
percent, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011. The increase for the three months ended
June 30, 2012
primarily reflects the impact of the RSC acquisition. The decrease for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
is primarily due to a reduction in the volume of supplies sold, which reflects our continued efforts to position contractor supplies as a complementary offering to equipment rentals. Our strategy over the past several years has focused on our core rental business. This strategy included substantially increasing the proportion of revenue derived from our core rental business,
38
Table of Contents
which increased from 71 percent in 2007 to 82 percent in 2011. As we focused on our core rental business, contractor supplies was repositioned as a complementary offering to equipment rentals, and the proportion of revenue derived from contractor supplies decreased substantially, from 10 percent in 2007 to 3 percent in 2011, while the gross margin from contractor supplies sales increased significantly from 19 percent in 2007 to 32 percent in 2011, as we adjusted our product mix to reduce or eliminate lower margin items.
Service and other revenues
. Service and other revenues primarily represent our revenues earned from providing repair and maintenance services (including parts sales). For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, service and other revenues represented approximately
3
percent of our total revenues. Our general rentals segment accounted for substantially all of these sales. For the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, service and other revenues
increased
4.8
and
2.4
percent, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2011.
Segment Equipment Rentals Gross Profit
Segment equipment rentals gross profit and gross margin were as follows:
General
rentals
Trench safety,
power and HVAC
Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Equipment Rentals Gross Profit
$
293
$
30
$
323
Equipment Rentals Gross Margin
37.5
%
46.9
%
38.2
%
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
Equipment Rentals Gross Profit
$
156
$
19
$
175
Equipment Rentals Gross Margin
32.6
%
42.2
%
33.4
%
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Equipment Rentals Gross Profit
$
437
$
48
$
485
Equipment Rentals Gross Margin
34.8
%
42.9
%
35.5
%
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Equipment Rentals Gross Profit
$
244
$
33
$
277
Equipment Rentals Gross Margin
27.8
%
41.8
%
28.9
%
General rentals
. For the three months ended
June 30, 2012
, equipment rentals gross profit increased by $
137
and equipment rentals gross margin increased by
4.9
percentage points from 2011, primarily reflecting increased rental rates and cost improvements, partially offset by a
0.2
percentage point decrease in time utilization. As compared to the equipment rentals revenue increase of
63.0
percent, aggregate repairs and maintenance and delivery costs increased
48.0
percent due primarily to higher rental volume, compensation costs increased
52.0
percent due primarily to increased headcount associated with higher rental volume and the RSC acquisition, building and property costs increased
43.0
percent due primarily to the impact of the RSC acquisition and insurance decreased
56.1
percent due primarily to our provision for self-insurance reserves. The revenue and cost increases all reflect the impact of the RSC acquisition since the
April 30, 2012
acquisition date. Equipment rental revenue increased more than costs because rates—which were a significant driver of the year-over-year revenue improvement—result in fewer variable costs compared to utilization. For the three months ended
June 30, 2012
and 2011, time utilization was
67.7
percent and
67.9
percent, respectively. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, equipment rentals gross profit increased by $
193
and equipment rentals gross margin increased by
7.0
percentage points from 2011, primarily reflecting increased rental rates, a
1.0
percentage point increase in time utilization and cost improvements. As compared to the equipment rentals revenue increase of
42.9
percent, aggregate repairs and maintenance and delivery costs increased
30.9
percent due primarily to higher rental volume, compensation costs increased
28.1
percent due primarily to increased headcount associated with higher rental volume and the RSC acquisition, building and property costs increased
16.8
percent due primarily to the impact of the RSC acquisition and insurance decreased
26.0
percent due primarily to our provision for self-insurance reserves. The revenue and cost increases all reflect the impact of the RSC acquisition since the
April 30, 2012
acquisition date. Equipment rental revenue increased more than costs because rates—which were a significant driver of the year-over-year revenue improvement—result in fewer variable costs compared to utilization. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and 2011, time utilization was
65.9
percent and
64.9
percent, respectively.
Trench safety, power and HVAC
. For the three months ended
June 30, 2012
, equipment rentals gross profit increased by
$11
and equipment rentals gross margin increased by
4.7
percentage points from 2011, primarily reflecting cost improvements and a reduction in lower margin re-rent revenue (equipment we rent from other companies and then rent to customers). As
39
Table of Contents
compared to the equipment rentals revenue increase of
42.2
percent, compensation costs increased
33.9
percent. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, equipment rentals gross profit increased by
$15
and equipment rentals gross margin increased by
1.1
percentage points from 2011, primarily reflecting cost improvements and a reduction in lower margin re-rent revenue. As compared to the equipment rentals revenue increase of
41.8
percent, compensation costs increased
33.9
percent. The 2012 improvements in equipment rentals gross profit also reflect our strategic focus on the higher margin equipment rented by the trench safety, power and HVAC segment. Trench safety, power and HVAC average OEC for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
increased
59
percent and
62
percent, respectively, as compared to 2011.
Gross Margin
. Gross margins by revenue classification were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Total gross margin
37.7
%
33.5
%
35.6
%
30.3
%
Equipment rentals
38.2
%
33.4
%
35.5
%
28.9
%
Sales of rental equipment
30.9
%
31.7
%
34.4
%
37.0
%
Sales of new equipment
22.7
%
19.0
%
20.0
%
19.4
%
Contractor supplies sales
30.4
%
27.3
%
31.7
%
30.2
%
Service and other revenues
63.6
%
61.9
%
62.8
%
59.5
%
For the three months ended
June 30, 2012
, total gross margin increased
4.2
percentage points as compared to the same period in 2011, primarily reflecting increased gross margins from equipment rentals. Equipment rentals gross margin increased
4.8
percentage points, primarily reflecting a
7.4
percent rental rate increase and cost improvements, partially offset by a
0.2
percentage point decrease in time utilization. As compared to the equipment rentals revenue increase of
61.3
percent, aggregate repairs and maintenance and delivery costs increased
47.5
percent due primarily to higher rental volume, compensation costs increased
50.7
percent due primarily to increased headcount associated with higher rental volume and the RSC acquisition, building and property costs increased
42.2
percent primarily due to the impact of the RSC acquisition and insurance decreased
47.3
percent primarily due to our provision for self-insurance reserves. The revenue and cost increases all reflect the impact of the RSC acquisition since the
April 30, 2012
acquisition date. Our equipment rental revenue increased more than our costs because rates—which were a significant driver of the year-over-year revenue improvement—result in fewer variable costs compared to utilization. For the three months ended
June 30, 2012
and 2011, time utilization was
67.1
percent and
67.3
percent, respectively.
For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, total gross margin increased
5.3
percentage points as compared to the same period in 2011, primarily reflecting increased gross margins from equipment rentals. Equipment rentals gross margin increased
6.6
percentage points, primarily reflecting a
7.4
percent rental rate increase, a
0.9
percentage point increase in time utilization and cost improvements. As compared to the equipment rentals revenue increase of
42.8
percent, aggregate repairs and maintenance and delivery costs increased
32.0
percent due primarily to higher rental volume, compensation costs increased
28.5
percent due primarily to increased headcount associated with higher rental volume and the RSC acquisition, and building and property costs increased
17.9
percent primarily due to the impact of the RSC acquisition and insurance decreased
20.9
percent primarily due to our provision for self-insurance reserves. The revenue and cost increases all reflect the impact of the RSC acquisition since the
April 30, 2012
acquisition date. Our equipment rental revenue increased more than our costs because rates—which were a significant driver of the year-over-year revenue improvement—result in fewer variable costs compared to utilization. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and 2011, time utilization was
65.2
percent and
64.3
percent, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”)
. SG&A expense information for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and 2011 was as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Total SG&A expenses
$
146
$
100
$
248
$
195
SG&A as a percentage of revenue
14.7
%
15.9
%
15.0
%
16.9
%
SG&A expense primarily includes sales force compensation, bad debt expense, information technology costs, advertising and marketing expenses, third-party professional fees, management salaries and clerical and administrative overhead. For the three months ended
June 30, 2012
, SG&A expense of
$146
increased
$46
as compared to 2011. The increase in SG&A
40
Table of Contents
primarily reflects increased compensation costs associated with increased revenues, improved profitability and increased headcount following the RSC acquisition. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A decreased
1.2
percentage points year over year. For the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, SG&A expense of
$248
increased
$53
as compared to 2011. The increase in SG&A primarily reflects increased compensation costs associated with increased revenues, improved profitability and increased headcount following the RSC acquisition. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A decreased
1.9
percentage points year over year.
RSC merger related costs.
As discussed above, in the second quarter of 2012, we completed the acquisition of RSC. The three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
include acquisition-related costs of
$80
and
$90
, respectively, primarily related to financial and legal advisory fees. The fees for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
include
$31
of interim bridge financing fees.
Restructuring charge.
For the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, the restructuring charges of
$53
primarily reflect severance costs and branch closure charges associated with the RSC merger. The branch closure charges primarily reflect continuing lease obligations at vacant facilities. For the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2011
, the restructuring charges of
$2
and
$3
, respectively, primarily reflected branch closure charges due to continuing lease obligations at vacant facilities. We expect to incur an additional
$60
to
$80
of charges in connection with the restructuring, which is expected to be substantially complete by
March 31, 2013
.
Non-rental depreciation and amortization
for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and 2011 was as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Non-rental depreciation and amortization
$
49
$
14
$
63
$
26
Non-rental depreciation and amortization for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
increased
$35
, or
250
percent, and
$37
, or
142
percent, respectively, as compared to 2011. Non-rental depreciation and amortization for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
increased primarily due to the 2012 acquisition of RSC discussed in note
2
to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Interest expense, net
for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and 2011 was as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Interest expense, net
$
121
$
57
$
189
$
113
Interest expense, net for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
increased $
64
, or
112
percent, and
$76
, or
67
percent, respectively, as compared to 2011. As discussed in note
8
to our condensed consolidated financial statements, in
March 2012
, we issued
$2,825
of debt ("the merger financing notes") in connection with the RSC acquisition. Upon completion of the RSC acquisition, we also assumed RSC's debt that remained after repayment of certain of RSC's senior debt. Interest expense, net for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
includes $16 and
$29
, respectively, of interest recorded on the merger financing notes prior to the closing of the merger. Interest expense, net for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
increased primarily due to increased average outstanding debt, including the debt issued and assumed in connection with the RSC acquisition, as compared to 2011.
Other income, net
for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and 2011 was as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
Other income, net
$
(12
)
$
(3
)
$
(13
)
$
(4
)
The 2012 increases in other income, net primarily reflect a
$10
gain recognized upon the sale of a former subsidiary that developed and marketed software.
Income taxes.
The following table summarizes our continuing operations (benefit) provision for income taxes and the related effective tax rates for the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and 2011:
41
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2012
2011
2012
2011
(Loss) income from continuing operations before (benefit) provision for income taxes
$
(64
)
$
39
$
(45
)
$
12
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
(12
)
11
(6
)
4
Effective tax rate
18.8
%
28.2
%
13.3
%
33.3
%
The differences between the 2012 and 2011 effective tax rates and the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35 percent primarily relate to the geographical mix of income between foreign and domestic operations, as well as the impact of state and local taxes, and certain nondeductible charges. Additionally, the three and
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
include a deferred tax charge of $8 related to the RSC acquisition.
Balance sheet.
The increases in our balance sheet from December 31, 2011 to
June 30, 2012
primarily reflect the impact of the RSC acquisition. See note
2
to our condensed consolidated financial statements for a summary of the estimated fair values of the RSC assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity and Capital Markets Activity.
We manage our liquidity using internal cash management practices, which are subject to (i) the policies and cooperation of the financial institutions we utilize to maintain and provide cash management services, (ii) the terms and other requirements of the agreements to which we are a party and (iii) the statutes, regulations and practices of each of the local jurisdictions in which we operate.
As discussed in note
8
to our condensed consolidated financial statements, in
March 2012
, in connection with the RSC acquisition, we issued
$750
aggregate principal amount of 5
3
/
4
percent Senior Secured Notes due 2018,
$750
aggregate principal amount of 7
3
/
8
percent Senior Notes due 2020 and
$1,325
aggregate principal amount of 7
5
/
8
percent Senior Notes due 2022. In March 2012, the size of the ABL facility was increased to
$1.9 billion
. Additionally, as discussed in note
8
to our condensed consolidated financial statements, upon completion of the RSC acquisition in April 2012, we assumed RSC's debt that remained after repayment of certain of RSC's senior debt.
As previously announced, in connection with the RSC acquisition, our Board authorized a stock buyback of up to $200 of Holdings' common stock. As of
July 13, 2012
, we have repurchased $
100
of Holdings' common stock and our intent is to complete the stock buyback within 18 months after the
April 30, 2012
closing of the RSC acquisition.
Our principal existing sources of cash are cash generated from operations and from the sale of rental equipment and borrowings available under our ABL facility and accounts receivable securitization facility. As of
June 30, 2012
, we had (i) $
494
of borrowing capacity, net of $
119
of letters of credit, available under the ABL facility, (ii) $
20
of borrowing capacity available under the accounts receivable securitization facility and (iii) cash and cash equivalents of $
41
. Cash equivalents at
June 30, 2012
consist of direct obligations of financial institutions rated A or better. We believe that our existing sources of cash will be sufficient to support our existing operations over the next 12 months.
As of
June 30, 2012
, $
1,287
and
$252
were outstanding under the ABL facility and the accounts receivable securitization facility, respectively. The interest rates applicable to the ABL facility and the accounts receivable securitization facility at
June 30, 2012
were
2.3 percent
and
0.9 percent
, respectively. During the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, the monthly average amounts outstanding under the ABL facility and the accounts receivable securitization facility were
$1,048
and
$230
, respectively, and the weighted-average interest rates thereon were
2.4 percent
and
0.9 percent
, respectively. The maximum month-end amounts outstanding under the ABL facility and the accounts receivable securitization facility during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
were
$1,287
and
$252
, respectively. During the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, the maximum amount outstanding under the ABL facility exceeded the average amount outstanding primarily due to additional borrowings in connection with the RSC acquisition.
We expect that our principal needs for cash relating to our operations over the next 12 months will be to fund (i) operating activities and working capital, (ii) the purchase of rental equipment and inventory items offered for sale, (iii) payments due under operating leases, (iv) debt service, and (v) acquisitions. We plan to fund such cash requirements from our existing sources of cash. In addition, we may seek additional financing through the securitization of some of our real estate, the use of additional operating leases or other financing sources as market conditions permit.
To access the capital markets, we rely on credit rating agencies to assign ratings to our securities as an indicator of credit quality. Lower credit ratings generally result in higher borrowing costs and reduced access to debt capital markets. Credit ratings also affect the costs of derivative transactions, including interest rate and foreign currency derivative transactions. As a
42
Table of Contents
result, negative changes in our credit ratings could adversely impact our costs of funding. Our credit ratings as of
July 13, 2012
were as follows:
Corporate Rating
Outlook
Moody’s
B2
Stable
Standard & Poor’s
B
Positive
Fitch
B
Stable
A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. There is no assurance that any rating will remain in effect for a given period of time or that any rating will not be revised or withdrawn by a rating agency in the future.
The amount of our future capital expenditures will depend on a number of factors, including general economic conditions and growth prospects. Our gross and net rental capital expenditures have increased significantly in 2012 relative to 2011. Net rental capital expenditures (defined as purchases of rental equipment less the proceeds from sales of rental equipment) were $
679
and $
339
during the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
and 2011, respectively. For the full year 2012, we expect net rental capital expenditures of between $
925
and $
975
, after gross purchases of between $
1.3
billion and $
1.4
billion. We expect that we will fund such expenditures from cash generated from operations, proceeds from the sale of rental and non-rental equipment and, if required, borrowings available under the ABL facility and accounts receivable securitization facility.
Loan Covenants and Compliance.
As of
June 30, 2012
, we were in compliance with the covenants and other provisions of the ABL facility, the accounts receivable securitization facility, the senior notes and the QUIPS. Any failure to be in compliance with any material provision or covenant of these agreements could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and operations.
In October 2011, we amended the ABL facility. In March 2012, the size of the ABL facility was increased to
$1.9 billion
. The only material financial covenants which currently exist relate to the fixed charge coverage ratio and the senior secured leverage ratio under the ABL facility. Since the October 2011 amendment of the facility and through
June 30, 2012
, availability under the ABL facility has exceeded the required threshold and, as a result, these maintenance covenants have been inapplicable. Subject to certain limited exceptions specified in the amended ABL facility, the fixed charge coverage ratio and the senior secured leverage ratio under the amended ABL facility will only apply in the future if availability under the amended ABL facility falls below the greater of
10 percent
of the maximum revolver amount under the amended ABL facility and
$150
. Under our accounts receivable securitization facility, we are required, among other things, to maintain certain financial tests relating to: (i) the default ratio, (ii) the delinquency ratio, (iii) the dilution ratio and (iv) days sales outstanding.
As of
June 30, 2012
, primarily due to losses sustained in prior years, URNA had limited restricted payment capacity under the most restrictive restricted payment covenants in the indentures governing its outstanding indebtedness. Although this limited capacity restricts our ability to move operating cash flows to Holdings, we do not expect any material adverse impact on Holdings’ ability to meet its cash obligations due to certain intercompany arrangements.
Sources and Uses of Cash.
During the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
, we (i) generated cash from operating activities of $
342
, (ii) generated cash from the sale of rental and non-rental equipment of $
169
and (iii) received cash from debt proceeds, net of payments, of $
1,729
, including
$2,825
of proceeds from debt issuances associated with the RSC acquisition, a portion of which was used to repay certain of RSC's senior debt. We used cash during this period principally to (i) purchase rental and non-rental equipment of $
898
, (ii) purchase other companies for $
1,175
, (iii) purchase shares of our common stock for
$115
and (iv) pay financing costs of
$67
. During the
six
months ended
June 30, 2011
, we (i) generated cash from operating activities of $
296
and (ii) generated cash from the sale of rental and non-rental equipment of $
81
. We used cash during this period principally to (i) purchase rental and non-rental equipment of $
425
and (ii) purchase other companies for $
143
.
Free Cash Flow GAAP Reconciliation.
We define “free cash (usage) flow” as (i) net cash provided by operating activities less (ii) purchases of rental and non-rental equipment plus (iii) proceeds from sales of rental and non-rental equipment and excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements, net. Management believes that free cash flow provides useful additional information concerning cash flow available to meet future debt service obligations and working capital requirements. However, free cash (usage) flow is not a measure of financial performance or liquidity under GAAP. Accordingly, free cash (usage) flow should not be considered an alternative to net income (loss) or cash flow from operating activities as an indicator of operating performance or liquidity. The table below provides a reconciliation between net cash provided by operating activities and free cash (usage) flow.
43
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2012
2011
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
342
$
296
Purchases of rental equipment
(836
)
(412
)
Purchases of non-rental equipment
(62
)
(13
)
Proceeds from sales of rental equipment
157
73
Proceeds from sales of non-rental equipment
12
8
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements, net
(1
)
—
Free cash usage
$
(388
)
$
(48
)
Free cash usage for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
was $
388
, an increase of $
340
as compared to $
48
for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2011
. Free cash usage increased primarily due to increased purchases of rental equipment, partially offset by increased proceeds from sales of rental equipment. Free cash usage for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2012
includes the impact of the RSC merger costs discussed above.
Certain Information Concerning Contractual Obligations
. The table below provides certain information concerning the payments coming due under certain categories of our existing contractual obligations as of
June 30, 2012
:
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Thereafter
Total
Debt and capital leases (1)
$
290
$
30
$
24
$
185
$
1,797
$
4,942
$
7,268
Interest due on debt (2)
245
479
478
475
433
1,441
3,551
Operating leases (1):
Real estate
59
103
82
66
50
104
464
Non-rental equipment
21
22
17
13
9
16
98
Service agreements (3)
12
—
—
—
—
—
12
Purchase obligations (4)
351
1
—
—
—
—
352
Subordinated convertible debentures (5)
2
4
4
4
4
95
113
Total (6)
$
980
$
639
$
605
$
743
$
2,293
$
6,598
$
11,858
_________________
(1)
The payments due with respect to a period represent (i) in the case of debt and capital leases, the scheduled principal payments due in such period, and (ii) in the case of operating leases, the minimum lease payments due in such period under non-cancelable operating leases. Our 4 percent Convertible Senior Notes mature in 2015, but are reflected as short-term debt in our consolidated balance sheet because they are redeemable at
June 30, 2012
. The 4 percent Convertible Senior Notes are reflected in the table above based on the contractual maturity date in 2015.
(2)
Estimated interest payments have been calculated based on the principal amount of debt and the applicable interest rates as of
June 30, 2012
. As discussed above, our 4 percent Convertible Senior Notes mature in 2015, but are reflected as short-term debt in our consolidated balance sheet because they are redeemable at
June 30, 2012
. Interest on the 4 percent Convertible Senior Notes is reflected in the table above based on the contractual maturity date in 2015.
(3)
These represent service agreements with third parties to provide wireless and network services, refurbish our aerial equipment and operate the distribution centers associated with contractor supplies.
(4)
As of
June 30, 2012
, we had outstanding purchase orders, which were negotiated in the ordinary course of business, with our equipment and inventory suppliers. These purchase commitments can be cancelled by us, generally with 30 days notice and without cancellation penalties. The equipment and inventory receipts from the suppliers for these purchases and related payments to the suppliers are expected to be completed throughout 2012 and 2013.
(5)
Represents principal and interest payments on the $
55
of 6
1
/
2
percent subordinated convertible debentures reflected in our consolidated balance sheets as of
June 30, 2012
.
(6)
This information excludes $
7
of unrecognized tax benefits. It is not possible to estimate the time period during which these unrecognized tax benefits may be paid to tax authorities.
Relationship between Holdings and URNA.
Holdings is principally a holding company and primarily conducts its operations through its wholly owned subsidiary, URNA, and subsidiaries of URNA. Holdings licenses its tradename and other intangibles and provides certain services to URNA in connection with its operations. These services principally include: (i) senior management services; (ii) finance and tax-related services and support; (iii) information technology systems and support; (iv) acquisition-related services; (v) legal services; and (vi) human resource support. In addition, Holdings leases certain equipment and real property that are made available for use by URNA and its subsidiaries.
44
Table of Contents
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our exposure to market risk primarily consists of (i) interest rate risk associated with our variable and fixed rate debt, (ii) foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with our Canadian operations and (iii) equity price risk associated with our convertible debt.
Interest Rate Risk.
As of
June 30, 2012
, we had an aggregate of $
1,539
of indebtedness that bears interest at variable rates, comprised of $
1,287
of borrowings under the ABL facility and
$252
of borrowings under our accounts receivable securitization facility. The amount of variable rate indebtedness outstanding under the ABL facility and accounts receivable securitization facility may fluctuate significantly. The interest rates applicable to our variable rate debt on
June 30, 2012
were
2.3 percent
for the ABL facility and
0.9 percent
for the accounts receivable securitization facility. As of
June 30, 2012
, based upon the amount of our variable rate debt outstanding, our annual after-tax earnings would decrease by approximately $
9
for each one percentage point increase in the interest rates applicable to our variable rate debt.
At
June 30, 2012
, we had an aggregate of $
5.8
billion of indebtedness that bears interest at fixed rates, including our subordinated convertible debentures. A one percentage point decrease in market interest rates as of
June 30, 2012
would increase the fair value of our fixed rate indebtedness by approximately
six percent
. For additional information concerning the fair value of our fixed rate debt, see note
7
(see “Fair Value of Financial Instruments”) to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Currency Exchange Risk
. The functional currency for our Canadian operations is the Canadian dollar. As a result, our future earnings could be affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. and Canadian dollars. Based upon the level of our Canadian operations during 2011 relative to the Company as a whole, a 10 percent change in this exchange rate would cause our annual after-tax earnings to change by approximately $6. We do not engage in purchasing forward exchange contracts for speculative purposes.
Equity Price Risk
.
In connection with the November 2009 4 percent Convertible Notes offering, Holdings entered into convertible note hedge transactions with option counterparties. The convertible note hedge transactions cost $26, and decreased additional paid-in capital by $17, net of taxes, in our accompanying condensed consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity (deficit). The convertible note hedge transactions cover, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, 15.1 million shares of our common stock. The convertible note hedge transactions are intended to reduce, subject to a limit, the potential dilution with respect to our common stock upon conversion of the 4 percent Convertible Notes. The effect of the convertible note hedge transactions is to increase the effective conversion price to $15.56 per share, equal to an approximately 75 percent premium over the $8.89 closing price of our common stock at issuance. The effective conversion price is subject to change in certain circumstances, such as if the 4 percent Convertible Notes are converted prior to May 15, 2015. In the event the market value of our common stock exceeds the effective conversion price per share, the settlement amount received from such transactions will only partially offset the potential dilution. For example, if, at the time of exercise of the conversion right, the price of our common stock was $
35.00
or $
40.00
per share, assuming an effective conversion price of $15.56 per share, on a net basis, we would issue
8.4
million or
9.2
million shares, respectively. Based on the price of our common stock during the
second
quarter of 2012, holders of the 4 percent Convertible Notes have the right to redeem the notes during the
third
quarter of 2012 at a conversion price of $11.11 per share of common stock. Between
July 1, 2012
(the beginning of the
third
quarter) and
July 13, 2012
, none of the 4 percent Convertible Senior Notes were redeemed.
If the total
$168
outstanding principal amount of the 4 percent Convertible Notes was converted, the total cost to settle the notes would be
$514
, assuming a conversion price of
$34.04
(the closing price of our common stock on
June 30, 2012
) per share of common stock. The
$168
principal amount would be settled in cash, and the remaining
$346
could be settled in cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination thereof, at our discretion. Based on the
June 30, 2012
closing stock price, approximately
10
million shares of stock, excluding any stock we would receive from the hedge counterparties as discussed below, would be issued if we settled the entire
$346
of conversion value in excess of the principal amount in stock. The total cost to settle would change approximately $
15
for each $1 (actual dollars) change in our stock price. If the full principal amount was converted at our
June 30, 2012
closing stock price, we estimate that we would receive approximately $
44
in either cash or stock from the hedge counterparties, after which the effective conversion price would be approximately
$14.03
. Additionally,
$5
principal amount of our 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Notes was outstanding at
June 30, 2012
. If the total
$5
outstanding principal amount of the 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Notes was converted, the total cost to settle the notes would be
$7
, assuming a conversion price of
$34.04
(the closing price of our common stock on
June 30, 2012
) per share of common stock. The total cost to settle would change by less than $1 for each $1 (actual dollars) change in our stock price. Based on the price of our common stock during the
first
quarter of 2012, holders of the 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes had the right to convert the notes during the
second
quarter of 2012 at a conversion price of
$21.83
per share of common stock, and
$17
of the 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes were converted. Upon conversion of the notes, we issued approximately
0.8 million
shares of our common stock to the applicable holders of the 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Senior
45
Table of Contents
Subordinated Notes. Based on the price of our common stock during the
second
quarter of 2012, holders of the 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes may convert the notes during the
third
quarter of 2012 at a conversion price of
$21.83
per share of common stock. Between
July 1, 2012
(the beginning of the
third
quarter) and
July 13, 2012
, none of the 1
7
/
8
percent Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes were converted.
46
Table of Contents
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Company’s management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e) of the Exchange Act, as of
June 30, 2012
. Based on the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
June 30, 2012
.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
June 30, 2012
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
47
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
The information set forth under note
9
to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q is incorporated by reference in answer to this item. Such information is limited to certain recent developments and should be read in conjunction with note 15 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed on Form 10-K on January 25, 2012.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Our results of operations and financial condition are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties described in our 2011 Form 10-K, which risk factors are incorporated herein by reference. You should carefully consider these risk factors in conjunction with the other information contained in this report. Should any of these risks materialize, our business, financial condition and future prospects could be negatively impacted.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c)
The following table provides information about purchases of Holdings’ common stock by Holdings during the
second
quarter of 2012:
Period
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
Average Price
Paid Per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2)
Maximum Dollar Amount of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program (2)
April 1, 2012 to April 30, 2012
855
(1)
$
43.39
$
—
$
—
May 1, 2012 to May 31, 2012
2,527,672
(1)
$
42.04
2,391,993
100,002,783
June 1, 2012 to June 30, 2012
20,315
(1)
$
31.42
—
—
Total
2,548,842
$
41.95
$
2,391,993
$
100,002,783
(1)
In
April 2012
,
May 2012
and
June 2012
,
855
,
135,679
and
20,315
shares, respectively, were withheld by Holdings to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock unit awards. These shares were not acquired pursuant to any repurchase plan or program.
(2)
In December 2012, in connection with the RSC acquisition, our Board announced its intention to authorize a stock buyback of up to $200 million of Holdings' common stock, which we intend to complete within 18 months after the April 30, 2012 closing of the RSC acquisition. Our Board announced its authorization of the stock buyback in April 2012.
48
Table of Contents
Item 6.
Exhibits
3(a)
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of United Rentals, Inc., dated March 16, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on March 17, 2009)
3(b)
By-laws of United Rentals, Inc., amended as of December 20, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2010)
3(c)*
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of United Rentals (North America), Inc., dated February 17, 2012
3(d)*
By-laws of United Rentals (North America), Inc., dated February 17, 2012
4(a)
First Supplemental Indenture to the 2022 Senior Notes, dated as of April 30, 2012, among UR Financing Escrow Corporation, UR Merger Sub Corporation, United Rentals, Inc., InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals (Delaware), Inc., United Rentals Financing Limited Partnership, United Rentals Highway Technologies Gulf, LLC, United Rentals Realty, LLC, Wynne Systems, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
4(b)
First Supplemental Indenture to the 2020 Senior Notes, dated as of April 30, 2012, among UR Financing Escrow Corporation, UR Merger Sub Corporation, United Rentals, Inc., InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals (Delaware), Inc., United Rentals Financing Limited Partnership, United Rentals Highway Technologies Gulf, LLC, United Rentals Realty, LLC. Wynne Systems, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
4(c)
First Supplemental Indenture to the 2018 Senior Secured Notes, dated as of April 30, 2012, among UR Financing Escrow Corporation, UR Merger Sub Corporation, United Rentals, Inc., InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals (Delaware), Inc., United Rentals Financing Limited Partnership, United Rentals Highway Technologies Gulf, LLC, United Rentals Realty, LLC, Wynne Systems, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
4(d)
First Supplemental Indenture to the URNA 9.25% Notes dated as of April 30, 2012, among United Rentals (North America), Inc., United Rentals, Inc., InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals (Delaware), Inc., United Rentals Financing Limited Partnership, United Rentals Highway Technologies Gulf, LLC, United Rentals Realty, LLC, Wynne Systems, Inc., UR Merger Sub Corporation and the Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
4(e)
First Supplemental Indenture to the URNA 10.875% Notes dated as of April 30, 2012, among United Rentals (North America), Inc., United Rentals, Inc., InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals (Delaware), Inc., United Rentals Financing Limited Partnership, United Rentals Highway Technologies Gulf, LLC, United Rentals Realty, LLC, Wynne Systems, Inc., UR Merger Sub Corporation and the Bank of New York Mellon. as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
4(f)
Second Supplemental Indenture to the URNA 8.375% Notes dated as of April 30, 2012, among United Rentals (North America), Inc., United Rentals, Inc., InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals (Delaware), Inc., United Rentals Financing Limited Partnership, United Rentals Highway Technologies Gulf, LLC, United Rentals Realty, LLC, Wynne Systems, Inc., UR Merger Sub Corporation and the Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
4(g)
Second Supplemental Indenture to the URNA 1.875% Notes dated as of April 30, 2012, among United Rentals (North America), Inc., United Rentals, Inc., UR Merger Sub Corporation and the Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
4(h)
First Supplemental Indenture to the RSC 10.25% Notes dated as of April 30, 2012, between UR Merger Sub Corporation and Wells Fargo, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
4(i)
Second Supplemental Indenture to the RSC 10.25% Notes dated as of April 30, 2012, among UR Merger Sub Corporation, InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals (Delaware), Inc., United Rentals Financing Limited Partnership, United Rentals Highway Technologies Gulf, LLC, United Rentals Realty, LLC. Wynne Systems, Inc. and Wells Fargo, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
4(j)
First Supplemental Indenture to the RSC 8.25% Notes dated as of April 30, 2012, between UR Merger Sub Corporation and Wells Fargo, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
49
Table of Contents
4(k)
Second Supplemental Indenture to the RSC 8.25% Notes dated as of April 30, 2012, among UR Merger Sub Corporation. InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals (Delaware), Inc., United Rentals Financing Limited Partnership, United Rentals Highway Technologies Gulf, LLC, United Rentals Realty, LLC, Wynne Systems, Inc. and Wells Fargo, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
10(a)
Joinder to the Registration Rights Agreement for the 2022 Senior Notes dated as of April 30, 2012, among UR Merger Sub Corporation, United Rentals, Inc., InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals (Delaware), Inc., United Rentals Financing Limited Partnership, United Rentals Highway Technologies Gulf, LLC, United Rentals Realty, LLC, and Wynne Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
10(b)
Joinder to the Registration Rights Agreement for the 2020 Senior Notes dated as of April 30, 2012, among UR Merger Sub Corporation, United Rentals, Inc., InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals (Delaware), Inc., United Rentals Financing Limited Partnership, United Rentals Highway Technologies Gulf, LLC, United Rentals Realty, LLC, and Wynne Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
10(c)
Joinder to the Registration Rights Agreement for the 2018 Senior Secured Notes dated as of April 30, 2012, among UR Merger Sub Corporation, United Rentals, Inc., InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals (Delaware), Inc., United Rentals Financing Limited Partnership, United Rentals Highway Technologies Gulf, LLC, United Rentals Realty, LLC, and Wynne Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
10(d)
Accession Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2012, to the URI ABL between UR Merger Sub Corporation and Bank of America, N.A. as collateral agent. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
10(e)
Supplement to the U.S. Security Agreement for the URI ABL dated as of April 30, 2012, among InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals Realty, LLC and Wynne Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
10(f)
Supplement to the U.S. Guarantee Agreement for the URI ABL dated as of April 30, 2012, among InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals Realty, LLC and Wynne Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
10(g)
Supplement to the Canadian Security Agreement for the URI ABL dated as of April 30, 2012, among InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals Realty, LLC and Wynne Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
10(h)
Supplement to the Canadian Guarantee Agreement for the URI ABL dated as of April 30, 2012, among InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals Realty, LLC and Wynne Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
10(i)
Supplement to the Intellectual Property Security Agreement for the URI ABL dated as of April 30, 2012, among InfoManager, Inc., United Rentals Realty, LLC and Wynne Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the United Rentals, Inc. Report on Form 8-K filed on May 3, 2012)
10(j)*
Form of United Rentals, Inc. 2012 Performance Award Agreement for Senior Management ‡
12*
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
31(a)*
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Chief Executive Officer
31(b)*
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by Chief Financial Officer
32(a)**
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Executive Officer
32(b)**
Section 1350 Certification by Chief Financial Officer
101***
The following materials from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Company and URNA, for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, filed on July 17, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
*
Filed herewith.
**
Furnished (and not filed) herewith pursuant to Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act.
***
Submitted pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T.
‡
Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.
50
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
Dated:
July 16, 2012
By:
/
S
/ J
OHN
J. F
AHEY
John J. Fahey
Vice President, Controller
and Principal Accounting Officer
UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INC.
Dated:
July 16, 2012
By:
/
S
/ J
OHN
J. F
AHEY
John J. Fahey
Vice President, Controller
and Principal Accounting Officer
51