Sterling Infrastructure
STRL
#1367
Rank
$16.31 B
Marketcap
$533.42
Share price
5.60%
Change (1 day)
51.69%
Change (1 year)
Text size:
1
FORM 10-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1998
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]

For the transition period from to
------------------------- --------------------

Commission file number: 0-19450

OAKHURST COMPANY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE 25-1655321
State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization Identification No.)

3513 CONCORD PIKE, SUITE 3527
WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19803
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (302) 478-9170

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
NONE

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:


Name of each exchange on
Title of each class which registered
------------------- ------------------------
COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE NONE
PREFERRED SHARES PURCHASE RIGHTS NONE


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [X]

Aggregate market value at May 1, 1998 of the voting stock held by non-affiliates
of the registrant: $2,195,910

At May 1, 1998, the registrant had 3,207,053 shares of common stock outstanding.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None
2
PART I


ITEM 1. BUSINESS

GENERAL

Oakhurst Company, Inc. ("Oakhurst" or "the Company") was formed as part
of a merger transaction in July 1991, in which Steel City Products, Inc.
("SCPI") became a majority-owned subsidiary of Oakhurst. In accordance with the
merger agreement, Oakhurst owns 10% of the outstanding common stock of SCPI and
all of the SCPI Series A Preferred Stock, with the result that the aggregate
fair market value of SCPI's common stock and Series A Preferred Stock owned by
Oakhurst is equal to approximately 90% of the aggregate fair market value of all
the issued and outstanding capital stock of SCPI; and represents 90% of the
voting stock of SCPI.

Pursuant to the merger, SCPI became a special, limited purpose
subsidiary that concentrates on its historical distribution business, while any
growth and expansion opportunities are expected to be pursued by Oakhurst or its
subsidiaries. Because Oakhurst's ownership of SCPI is primarily in the form of
preferred stock, Oakhurst retains the value of SCPI, and Oakhurst's income from
SCPI is determined by the Series A Preferred stock dividend. This form of
ownership is designed to facilitate the preservation and utilization of SCPI's
net operating loss carry-forwards, which amount to approximately $154 million.

Oakhurst, through SCPI and Dowling's Fleet Service Co., Inc.
("Dowling's"), is primarily a distributor of products to the automotive
after-market. Its largest business, which is conducted by SCPI under the trade
name "Steel City Products", is the distribution of automotive parts and
accessories and non-food pet supplies from a facility in McKeesport,
Pennsylvania.

In August 1994, Oakhurst acquired all the outstanding capital stock of
Dowling's Fleet Service Co., Inc. ("Dowling's"), a distributor of automotive
radiators based in Mt. Vernon, New York that now operates seven facilities in
New York, Connecticut, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

In March 1995, Oakhurst formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Oakhurst
Management Corporation ("OMC"), to coordinate the provision of corporate
administrative services to the Company and its subsidiaries. Certain officers of
the Company and its subsidiaries are paid and are provided benefits by Oakhurst
Management Corporation.

In January 1994, Oakhurst acquired all the outstanding capital stock of
H&H Distributors, Inc., d/b/a Harry Survis ("H&H"), a Pittsburgh-based company
involved in the distribution and installation of automotive accessories,
including stereos, alarms and cellular phones, and in October 1994, Oakhurst
acquired all the outstanding capital stock of Puma Products, Inc., ("Puma"), a
distributor of after-market products to the light truck and van conversion
industry from facilities in Grand Prairie, Texas and Elkhart, Indiana. Oakhurst
sold Puma and H&H effective as of May 31, 1997 and July 14, 1997, respectively.


STEEL CITY PRODUCTS, INC.

BACKGROUND

SCPI was incorporated in West Virginia in 1959, and in 1963 became
known as Heck's, Inc. In 1969, the "Steel City Products" automotive distribution
business was acquired. SCPI was reincorporated in Delaware under the name
Hallwood Industries Incorporated in fiscal 1991. The name was changed to Steel
City Products, Inc. in January 1993.

For many years prior to 1990, Heck's, Inc. operated a Retail Division
consisting of a chain of discount department stores. In September 1990, all of
the assets of the Retail Division were sold to Retail Acquisition Corp.
("RAC"), an unrelated company.


-1-
3



OPERATIONS

SCPI primarily distributes automotive accessories. These products
include functional and decorative car and truck accessories (such as floor mats,
seat covers, mirrors, running boards and lights), car care products (including
waxes and paints), chemicals (such as antifreeze, windshield washer fluid and
motor oil) and car repair and maintenance items (including spark plugs,
windshield wipers, and air and oil filters). In fiscal 1996, the product
selection was expanded to include selected "hard parts" such as brake rotors,
and in fiscal 1997, SCPI introduced non-food pet supplies to its merchandise
selection, and opened a new Wing-Tech division ("Wing-Tech") that distributes
automotive "wings" or spoilers. Although the pet supplies are not typical of
SCPI's historical merchandise mix, management determined that the availability
of existing customers which sell both pet supplies and automotive accessories,
combined with SCPI's distribution expertise and infrastructure, offered an
opportunity for increased sales. In May 1997, the Wing-Tech division was sold to
the buyer of Puma. For about twenty-seven years, SCPI's operations were
conducted from a facility in Pittsburgh until December 1997, when the building
was sold, and SCPI's operations were moved to a newer, leased facility in
McKeesport, Pennsylvania.

Certain of SCPI's business is performed on a service basis, which
involves visits by its sales personnel to customers' stores to count and
re-order merchandise; generally, these re-orders are transmitted electronically
to SCPI's offices in McKeesport and shipments are either made directly to each
of the customers' stores or pre-packed for onward shipment to stores by the
retailers' own distribution centers. Certain customers electronically transmit
their orders to SCPI's headquarters. Because many orders are generated
electronically and are shipped within a few days of receipt, the size of SCPI's
order backlog is not relevant to an understanding of the business. SCPI also
provides price ticketing and associated services to those of its customers who
request such services.

SOURCES OF SUPPLY

SCPI acquires its merchandise from a large number of suppliers, none of
which accounts for more than 15% of its revenues. Many of the products sold by
SCPI carry nationally-advertised brand names, but because of the diversity and
number of suppliers and products carried, the business is not generally
dependent on the continued availability of individual products or continued
dealings with existing supply sources. From time to time, market or seasonal
conditions may affect the availability of certain merchandise, but not to the
extent that the Company believes would materially impact its business.

Steel City generally carries in inventory only those products that its
customers have identified as necessary for their own merchandising needs, and
does not acquire significant quantities of other merchandise.

SEASONALITY

SCPI's automotive business is seasonal, being slower in the early
winter months than at other times of the year. In anticipation of higher sales
volume in the spring and summer, SCPI carries higher automotive inventories,
beginning in February. As is customary in the automotive aftermarket, many
suppliers allow extended payment terms for such inventory build-ups and in turn,
SCPI grants extended payment terms to many of its customers to facilitate their
inventory build-ups.

SCPI's non-food pet supply business is expected to experience somewhat
different seasonal trends from its automotive business, but the effect of this
is not expected to be material until this business more fully develops.

SCPI's needs for working capital are affected by these seasonal
fluctuations (see Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources").

CUSTOMER BASE

SCPI's customers include general merchandise retail chains, automotive
specialty stores, supermarket chains, drug stores, hardware stores, variety
stores and other automotive accessory distributors. Most customers are based in
the northeastern United States, although stores operated by some customers are
located outside the northeastern states. There are no foreign sales.


-2-
4



SCPI's customers are continually affected by changes in the retail
environment, including the recent competitive pressures facing regional mass
merchandisers and the growing influence of national automotive specialty chains.
These have led to fluctuations in the level of business that SCPI enjoys with
individual customers. In fiscal 1996, SCPI lost two significant customers and
since, has suffered reductions in business as certain customers have closed
stores in the face of competition, have been forced into bankruptcy, or have
reduced their automotive merchandise selection. Furthermore, some customers have
changed their buying practices to acquire certain merchandise direct from
manufacturers rather than through distributors such as Steel City Products.

In its efforts to offset these trends, SCPI has added new customers,
expanded its product offerings to certain customers, enlarged the territory that
it serves and introduced new categories of products. These efforts have helped
to stabilize the erosion of SCPI's customer base so that sales in fiscal 1998
were substantially the same as those in fiscal 1997, however, they have not
returned SCPI's sales to the revenue levels of fiscal 1996. SCPI continues to
pursue new customer relationships that, if concluded, could increase sales in
fiscal 1999; however, there can be no assurance that new business can be
secured.

Sales attributable to SCPI were approximately $18 million, or 55% of
Oakhurst's consolidated sales, in fiscal 1998. The following table shows sales
to customers that individually have accounted for more than 10% of consolidated
sales during the latest three fiscal years (all of these customers being
attributable to SCPI) (dollars in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended
February 28, 1998 February 28, 1997 February 29, 1996
------------------- ------------------- ---------------------
% of % of % of
Sales Total Sales Sales Total Sales Sales Total Sales
----- ----------- ----- ----------- ----- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Forest City -- -- -- -- $4,641 10%
Jamesway -- -- -- -- $3,975 8%
</TABLE>

Jamesway Corporation ("Jamesway") filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection in July 1993, emerged in January 1995, and continued to be one of
SCPI's largest customers until the second quarter of fiscal 1996, when Jamesway
began experiencing new financial difficulties. In October 1995 Jamesway again
filed for bankruptcy protection and announced that it would close all of its
stores.

During the third quarter of fiscal 1996, Forest City Auto Parts, Inc.
("Forest City") informed SCPI that it had decided to change its source of
supply, and sales to Forest City ended in January 1996.

None of SCPI's business is based on government contracts, and there are
no long-term sales contracts with any customers.


COMPETITION

Both the automotive parts and accessories distribution industry and the
non-food pet supply industry are highly competitive, with several similar
companies operating in SCPI's market place, and many of SCPI's suppliers also
offer their products directly to retailers. Management is unable to quantify
SCPI's relative size in the distribution industry or in relation to its
competitors. SCPI competes on the basis of the breadth of merchandise offered,
price, level of service, order fill rates and order turnaround times. Management
believes that SCPI's long history, good reputation, experienced management,
product variety, pricing, service levels and high order fill rates enable it to
compete favorably with other distributors.


REGULATION

SCPI's management does not anticipate that existing or known pending
environmental legislation or other regulations will require major capital
expenditures or will affect its operations.


-3-
5



EMPLOYEES

SCPI employs approximately 55 persons, of whom about 45 are employed in
the headquarters office and distribution facility in McKeesport. Most of the
others are field personnel. Senior executives, including Bernard Frank (a
founder of Steel City Products in 1947), have many years of service with SCPI
and some are employed under long-term contracts.

The warehouse and certain office employees of SCPI are represented by
Local 636 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. SCPI believes that it
has experienced generally good labor relations, and no significant labor
disputes have affected its business in recent years. Renewal negotiations
related to the union agreement have continued beyond its expiration in November
1995.


DOWLING'S FLEET SERVICE CO., INC.

BACKGROUND AND CUSTOMER BASE

Dowling's was established in 1933 and is one of the largest
distributors of automotive radiators and related products in the northeastern
United States. It operates two facilities in each of New York, Connecticut and
New Jersey, and in fiscal 1997 expanded to a seventh facility by the acquisition
of all of the capital stock of G&O Sales Company, a radiator distributor serving
the greater Philadelphia market. Oakhurst acquired all the capital stock of
Dowling's in August 1994 from James Dowling, who owned and managed the business
for many years and who is the son of the founder. Two long-time employees now
manage the business as President and Vice President under long-term employment
agreements.

Most of Dowling's customers are radiator repair shops, which perform
repairs for car dealers, service stations and retail customers. Dowling's has
avoided a multi-level approach, so as to build strong allegiance from its
radiator repair shop customers, and has achieved a high market share in its
markets. There are no foreign sales. Dowling's has a broad customer base, with
no one customer representing a material proportion of consolidated sales.

The radiator replacement market has undergone important changes in
recent years. As manufacturers sought to reduce automobile weight,
aluminum/plastic radiators tended to replace the traditional copper/brass models
as original equipment. Initially, this product changeover extended radiator
lives, so that the replacement market experienced a decrease in replacement
demand. This trend is now reversing, as the aluminum/plastic products are
beginning to reach replacement age. Furthermore, these new radiators are more
difficult to repair than copper/brass, so that the proportion of replacement to
repair has increased. In addition, the number of radiator models has increased
in recent years. For these reasons, management believes that repair shops have
become more dependent on distributors for both selection and service.

Sales attributable to Dowling's were approximately $14.4 million, or
45% of Oakhurst's consolidated revenues, in fiscal 1998.

SOURCES OF SUPPLY

Dowling's acquires its products from several well-known manufacturers,
and carries both name-brand and generic products. Because of its buying position
and storage facilities, Dowling's is able to obtain competitive pricing from its
suppliers. Dowling's concentrates on offering high quality products and it
purchases the majority of the product it sells from a major U.S. radiator
manufacturer, Modine Manufacturing Company ("Modine"); Dowling's is believed to
be one of Modine's largest U.S. after-market customers.


-4-
6



SEASONALITY

Dowling's business is seasonal, with higher revenues in the hot summer
months and very cold winter months when automobile radiators are most affected
by extreme temperatures. Changes in weather patterns in Dowling's market area
may therefore affect its sales levels significantly.

COMPETITION

Dowling's competes with many other radiator distributors. Dowling's
reputation is based on its competitive pricing, quality products, and service
consisting of twice daily delivery to customers. Because of this, Oakhurst
believes that Dowling's is positioned to withstand the competition in its
markets and to build upon its historic sales and profits. However, there can be
no assurance that past levels of revenues and profitability can be maintained.
In fiscal 1998, Dowling's began to experience increased demand and competition
for lower priced, generic product, and in response, established its own value
priced "house" generic brand of radiators, which carry a limited lifetime
warranty that is supported by the manufacturer. Because many other generic
brands do not carry such a warranty, management believes that this new line will
compete favorably with other distributors that offer primarily generic product.

REGULATION

Dowling's management does not anticipate that any major capital
expenditures will be required by existing or known pending environmental
legislation or other regulations.

EMPLOYEES

Dowling's employs approximately 55 persons, none of whom are
represented by a union. Dowling's believes that its employee relations are
generally good.



SUBSIDIARY DISPOSALS - H&H DISTRIBUTORS, INC. AND PUMA PRODUCTS, INC.

Operations in fiscal 1997 and 1996 included those of H&H and Puma. H&H
and Puma were acquired by Oakhurst in fiscal 1995 and fiscal 1996, respectively.

In fiscal 1997, H&H and Puma experienced operating losses of
approximately $500,000 in the aggregate on sales of approximately $9.4 million.
Effective as of May 31, 1997, and July 14, 1997, Oakhurst sold Puma and H&H,
respectively, reflecting management's determination to return the Company to
profitability.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Since December 1997, SCPI operates its business from a leased, 67,000
square-foot building located in a new industrial park in McKeesport,
Pennsylvania.

Dowling's conducts it business from seven leased facilities aggregating
92,000 square feet, which are located in Mt. Vernon and Hempstead, New York, in
Bridgeport and East Hartford, Connecticut, in Hillside and Lodi, New Jersey and
in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Company.



-5-
7



ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS


During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended February 28, 1998,
the 1997 Annual Stockholder's Meeting was held at which the only matter to be
voted upon was the election of directors, which was effected through the
solicitation of proxies pursuant to applicable proxy rules.


-6-
8



PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS

The Company's Common Stock was listed and traded on the Nasdaq
Small-Cap Market under the symbol OAKC until February 10, 1998, when the Common
Stock was delisted from trading. The delisting was a result of the Company's
stock price falling below the Nasdaq minimum closing bid price of $1.00 per
share, and the Company's net tangible assets falling below Nasdaq's minimum
maintenance requirements. Commencing February 11, 1998, the Company's Common
Stock was eligible to trade on the OTC Bulletin Board under its existing symbol.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated prior to the
delisting, the high and low bid prices for the Company's Common Stock as
reported by Nasdaq:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1998 FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1997
----------------------------------- -----------------------------------
QUARTER HIGH LOW HIGH LOW
------- ---- --- ---- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
First $1.44 $0.81 $1.38 $1.00

Second $1.50 $0.50 $1.38 $1.00

Third $1.25 $0.63 $1.31 $1.00

Fourth $1.13 $0.69 $1.31 $1.13
</TABLE>



The stock price ranges reflect inter-dealer prices without retail
mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual
transactions.

There were approximately 3,600 holders of record of Oakhurst's common
stock on May 1, 1998.




-7-
9
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


The following table sets forth selected financial and other data of
Oakhurst Company, Inc. and subsidiaries and should be read in conjunction with
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, which follows, and with the Consolidated Financial Statements and
related Notes.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 29, FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 26,
1998 (A) 1997 (B) 1996 1995 1994
----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- -----------
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
OPERATING RESULTS:
Sales ....................................... $ 32,307 $ 41,928 $ 47,339 $ 43,142 $ 32,386
======== ======== ======== ======== ========

Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income taxes .................... $ 608 $ (5,663) $ (2,158) $ 1,442 $ 786

Current income tax (expense) benefit ........ (16) (12) 115 (155) (112)
Deferred income tax expense (c) ............. (1,000) (3,086) (2,000) (468) (235)

-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(Loss) income from continuing operations .... (408) (8,761) (4,043) 819 439

Income from discontinued
retail operations (d) .................. -- -- 65 90 --

-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net (loss) income ........................... $ (408) $ (8,761) $ (3,978) $ 909 $ 439
======== ======== ======== ======== ========

BASIC AND DILUTED PER SHARE AMOUNTS:
(Loss) income from continuing operations .... $ (0.13) $ (2.74) $ (1.27) $ 0.27 $ 0.16
Income from discontinued
retail operations ...................... -- -- 0.02 0.03 --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net (loss) income ........................... $ (0.13) $ (2.74) $ (1.25) $ 0.30 $ 0.16
======== ======== ======== ======== ========

BALANCE SHEET STATISTICS:
Total assets ................................ $ 14,031 $ 15,907 $ 26,117 $ 33,301 $ 18,767
Long-term obligations ....................... $ 4,318 $ 5,716 $ 7,569 $ 6,612 $ 1,429
Book value per share of common stock ........ $ 0.54 $ 0.67 $ 3.41 $ 4.65 $ 4.39
</TABLE>


(a) In fiscal 1998, SCPI sold its warehouse in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania for a
gross sale price of approximately $2.8 million in cash. SCPI recognized a
pre-tax gain of approximately $1.8 million in connection with the sale (see
Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).


(b) Results for fiscal 1997 include an aggregate charge of approximately $3.5
million related to the sale of Puma and H&H, two of the Company's
subsidiaries. The charge primarily consisted of the write-off of the
goodwill associated with the acquisition of such subsidiaries (see Note 2
to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

(c) Results for fiscal 1998, fiscal 1997 and fiscal 1996 include net non-cash
deferred tax charges of approximately $1 million, $3.1 million and $2
million, respectively, primarily relating to increases in the Company's
valuation allowance of its deferred tax asset (see Note 6 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements).

(d) In fiscal 1991, SCPI sold its Retail Division to RAC as discussed in Note 7
to the Consolidated Financial Statements. SCPI remained contingently liable
for most mortgage debt, and for many lease obligations of the Retail
Division following the sale. RAC was forced into bankruptcy in March 1991.
RAC's Reorganization Plan (the "RAC Plan") contained provisions for
releases in favor of SCPI together with an injunction against further
actions by contingent creditors against SCPI. Accordingly, SCPI was
released from further liability except for payment of the Creditor Notes,
as further described in Note 7 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.





-8-
10



ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

Management believes that the corporate structure resulting from the
merger transaction, whereby Steel City Products Inc. ("SCPI") became a special,
limited purpose, majority-owned subsidiary of Oakhurst Company, Inc.
("Oakhurst"), will facilitate capital formation by Oakhurst while permitting
Oakhurst and SCPI to file consolidated tax returns so that both may utilize
existing tax benefits, including approximately $154 million of net operating
loss carry-forwards. Through Oakhurst's ownership of SCPI, primarily in the form
of preferred stock, Oakhurst retains the value of SCPI, and receives
substantially all of the benefit of SCPI's operations through dividends on such
preferred stock. Oakhurst's ownership of SCPI facilitates the preservation and
utilization of SCPI's net operating loss carry-forwards.

Until 1994, Oakhurst's principal business, which is conducted by SCPI
under the trade name "Steel City Products", was the distribution of automotive
parts and accessories from a facility in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

In August 1994, Oakhurst acquired all the outstanding capital stock of
Dowling's Fleet Service Co., Inc. ("Dowling's"), a New York-headquartered
distributor of automotive radiators and related products, for an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $4.7 million, all of which has been paid except
for two notes payable to certain executives of Dowling's with a remaining
balance of $286,000. In March 1996, Dowling's acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of G&O, a radiator distributor based in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.

In connection with the acquisition of G&O, Dowling's entered into a
non-competition agreement with the seller that provides for aggregate payments
of $315,000 over a three year period that began in March 1996, and for payments
of 7.5% of the defined profits of G&O for the first four years of ownership. The
value of the non-competition agreement has been discounted using an imputed
interest rate of 9.75%, and the related asset is being amortized over the life
of the agreement, which is ten years.

In January 1994, Oakhurst acquired all the outstanding capital stock of
H&H Distributors, d/b/a Harry Survis ("H&H"), a Pittsburgh-based company that
distributes and installs automotive accessories, including stereos, alarms and
cellular phones, and in October 1994, Oakhurst acquired all of the outstanding
capital stock of Puma Products, Inc. ("Puma"), a Texas-based distributor of
after-market products to the light truck and van conversion industry. In fiscal
1997, these two subsidiaries experienced aggregate losses of approximately
$500,000, and as a result, Oakhurst sold Puma and H&H in May 1997 and July 1997,
respectively (see "Management's Discussion and Analysis - Significant Events and
Trends").

SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AND TRENDS

SCPI SUBSIDIARY

SCPI's customers are continually affected by changes in the retail
environment, including the recent competitive pressures facing regional mass
merchandisers and the growing influence of national automotive specialty chains.
These have led to fluctuations in the level of business that SCPI enjoys with
individual customers. In fiscal 1996, SCPI lost two significant customers and
has since suffered reductions in business as certain customers have closed
stores in the face of competition, have been forced into bankruptcy, have
reduced their automotive merchandise selection, or have changed their buying
practices to acquire certain merchandise direct from manufacturers rather than
through distributors such as SCPI.

In its efforts to offset these trends, SCPI strengthened its sales team
to help identify new customers and better serve existing customers, expanded its
product offerings to certain customers and enlarged the territory that it
serves. In fiscal 1996, SCPI began offering certain "hard parts" such as brake
rotors, and in fiscal 1997, SCPI introduced a new merchandise category of
non-food pet supplies, and began a new division ("Wing-Tech") to distribute
automotive wings (or spoilers). Although the pet supplies are not typical of
SCPI's historical merchandise mix, management determined that the availability
of existing customers which sell both pet supplies and automotive


-9-
11



accessories, combined with SCPI's distribution expertise and infrastructure,
offered an opportunity for increased sales. In June 1997, SCPI sold the
Wing-Tech business to the buyer of Oakhurst's Puma Products subsidiary.

Since fiscal 1996, SCPI has added new customers and expanded sales to
certain other customers, and during the latter part of fiscal 1997, SCPI began
to ship pet supplies to an existing significant automotive customer, Giant
Eagle, and added a supermarket chain, Kroger, as an automotive customer. These
efforts have helped to stabilize the erosion of SCPI's customer base so that
sales in fiscal 1998 were substantially the same as fiscal 1997, however, they
have not returned SCPI's sales to the revenue levels of fiscal 1996. SCPI
continues to pursue new customer relationships that, if concluded, could
increase sales in fiscal 1999, however, there can be no assurance that these
efforts will be successful.


DOWLING'S SUBSIDIARY

During the first half of fiscal 1996, Dowling's was faced with intense
competitive pressures in one of its markets due to the nearby opening of a
competitor. Management's efforts to overcome this competition succeeded, and in
fiscal 1997 Dowling's experienced an improved competitive situation and a
strengthening of demand in its existing markets, with a return to historical
levels of sales and gross margins. To further expand its sales, in the first
quarter of fiscal 1997, Dowling's acquired an existing radiator distributor in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for approximately $210,000, that was paid half in
cash and half in the form of a one year note payable.

In fiscal 1998, Dowling's began to experience increased demand and
competition for lower priced, generic product, and in response, established its
own value priced "house" generic brand of radiators, which carry a limited
lifetime warranty that is supported by the manufacturer. Because many other
generic brands do not carry such a warranty, management believes that this new
line will compete favorably with other distributors that offer primarily generic
product.


JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT

In February 1998, Oakhurst along with two co-venturers, entered into an
agreement with a major New York investment bank relating to tax efficient lease
securitization structures which Oakhurst has been developing for some time.
Under the agreement, the venturers may participate in the structuring and
marketing of securities relating to equipment leasing transactions. The
agreement provides for a sharing of any fees generated by the agreement and
commits Oakhurst to an investment in some of the securities created by the
structure. The agreement has an initial term of six months, which is
automatically renewed for additional six-month periods following the closing of
one or more transactions. There can be no assurance that any transaction can be
successfully marketed or closed.


SUBSIDIARIES DISPOSALS - H&H AND PUMA

Despite the opening of new facilities, the introduction of new product
lines, a restructuring of the sales force and increased advertising, sales at
H&H continued on a downward trend, due principally to reduced demand for certain
categories of car accessories and increased competition in the cellular phone
business, combined with a decrease in the commission rate earned on each phone
activation. Because of management's belief that these trends could not be
reversed, and to end the cash drain on Oakhurst's resources, in July 1997, H&H
was sold to James Stein, a Vice-President of H&H, in exchange for the
cancellation of the intercompany debts to H&H and the retention by Oakhurst of
certain insurance claims related to H&H. The sale eliminated substantial
contingent obligations related to lease and employment agreements with the
former owner of H&H and with Mr. Stein.

At Puma, beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 1996, the strong
retail demand for light trucks and sport utility vehicles had an adverse impact
on sales, because vehicle manufacturers sought to satisfy dealer demand at the
expense of converters, which represented an important segment of Puma's
customers. This situation led to an intensification of competition among
suppliers to the converter market and certain converter customers were lost, and
for the remainder of fiscal 1996 and through 1997 resulted in a downward sales
trend. In response to this


-10-
12
situation, management during fiscal 1996 opened a second facility in Elkhart,
Indiana, center of the vehicle conversion industry; continued to strengthen its
management and sales team; enlarged its product offering, including the addition
of van products to its wood accessories line; and introduced an extensive
catalog targeted at the restyler and accessories retailer market. Although sales
of certain non-wood accessories increased, sales of wood accessories continued
to reflect a downward trend, and Puma had operating losses of approximately
$270,000 in fiscal 1997. To end the cash drain on Oakhurst, effective May 1997
the Company sold Puma to its former owner, Anthony N. Puma, a director of
Oakhurst, in return for the cancellation of $600,000 in acquisition debt due to
him by Oakhurst, the cancellation of future earn-out obligations to Mr. Puma,
the repayment by Mr. Puma of $400,000 in revolving debt owed by Puma under a
credit agreement, the cancellation of Oakhurst's intercompany debts to Puma, and
the payment of $50,000 by Oakhurst to Mr. Puma. The agreement also provides for
Mr. Puma to make a payment to Oakhurst in the event he re-sells the business,
under certain circumstances. The sale eliminated substantial contingent
obligations related to lease and employment agreements with Mr. Puma.

As a result of the disposition of these two businesses, Oakhurst's
results for fiscal 1997 include a charge of approximately $3.5 million, of which
about $3.1 million represented the write-off of the excess of costs over net
assets acquired (goodwill) relating to their original acquisition. Results for
fiscal 1998 include other income from these two businesses of $72,000, including
the recovery of the insurance claims related to H&H.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

FINANCING AND LINE OF CREDIT

In addition to cash derived from the operation of its subsidiaries,
Oakhurst's liquidity and financing requirements have been determined principally
by the working capital needed to support each subsidiary's level of business,
together with the need for capital expenditures and the cash required to repay
debt. Each subsidiary's level of working capital needs varies primarily with the
amounts of inventory carried, which can change seasonally, the size and
timeliness of payment of receivables from customers, especially at SCPI which
from time to time grants extended payment terms for seasonal inventory
build-ups; and the amount of credit extended by suppliers.

At February 28, 1998, Oakhurst's debt primarily consisted of (i)
revolving debt under a credit agreement with a balance of approximately $4
million; (ii) notes payable of $286,000 that were issued in connection with the
fiscal 1995 acquisition of Dowling's (the "DFS Notes"), and a non-competition
agreement of $114,000 issued in connection with Dowling's acquisition of G&O;
and (iii) the SCPI Creditor Notes (see below).

Historically, SCPI's operations have been more profitable than in the
past three years and its cash flow used to be sufficient to fund its own working
capital needs, to repay the scheduled principal reductions and to pay dividends
to and make loans to Oakhurst. Prior to fiscal 1996, accumulated cash, along
with the addition of debt under a term loan and credit agreement, was used for
acquisitions. In fiscal 1996 and fiscal 1997, there was positive cash flow from
operations, but not in amounts sufficient to satisfy all of the Company's debt
service obligations. As a result, revolving debt increased in those two years.

In March 1996, Oakhurst obtained financing from an institutional
lender, replacing its then existing credit arrangement, that provided a two-year
total facility of $9.5 million, comprising a SCPI term loan of $1.5 million (the
"Fixed Asset Loan") and a maximum revolving credit facility of $8 million (the
"Revolver") (collectively, the "Credit Facility").

Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at the higher of the
Citibank N.A. base rate plus 1.5%, or $5,000 per month, and borrowings under the
Revolver are subject to a borrowing base that is calculated according to defined
levels of Oakhurst's subsidiaries' accounts receivable and inventories. The
Credit Facility contains certain customary restrictive financial and
non-financial covenants, including the maintenance of defined subsidiary and
consolidated tangible net worth levels and consolidated current ratio, and
limitations on cash dividends. The Credit Facility is secured by the accounts
receivable, inventories, and fixed assets of Oakhurst's subsidiaries.


-11-
13



In June 1997, Oakhurst entered into an agreement with the lender to
amend the Credit Facility to reflect the disposals of H&H and Puma. The
agreement principally reduced the maximum amount available under the Revolver to
$7 million, subject to a borrowing base, and amended certain financial
covenants, including the elimination of a covenant related to the Company's
consolidated tangible net worth. In September 1997, Oakhurst reached an
agreement to extend the Revolver beyond its initial two year term to April 1999,
and paid a fee of $35,000 in connection with the renewal. The Credit Facility
provides for subsequent automatic renewal terms of one year each upon payment of
a renewal fee of 0.5% of the entire line, unless earlier terminated as provided
for in the Agreement.

In part to reduce its overall debt level, in December 1997 SCPI sold
its warehouse in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to an unrelated third party for a
gross purchase price of approximately $2.8 million in cash. Accordingly, the
results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998 include a pre-tax gain of
approximately $1.8 million in connection with the sale. After repayment of the
Fixed Asset Loan secured by the property, the net proceeds of approximately $1.6
million were used to cover the expenses of moving to newer, leased premises, to
make certain improvements to such premises, to increase levels of working
capital and to reduce the Revolver, which had increased during fiscal 1998 as a
result of shortfalls in cash from operations.

The DFS notes bear interest at 6%, and provide for repayment in
quarterly installments of $22,000 each, together with accrued interest thereon,
which commenced in June 1996.

The G&O note payable of $105,000 carried interest at 7%, and was paid
in full in March 1997. In connection with the G&O acquisition, Dowling's entered
into a non-competition agreement with the seller that provides for aggregate
payments of $315,000 over a three year period, and for payments of 7.5% of the
defined profits of G&O for the first four years of ownership. The value of the
non-competition agreement has been discounted using an imputed interest rate of
9.75%, and the related asset is being amortized over the life of the agreement,
which is ten years.

The creditor notes that were issued by SCPI in connection with the
bankruptcy of Retail Acquisition Corp., (the "Creditor Notes") (see Note 7 to
the consolidated financial statements) are payable in six equal annual
installments through July 1998. The Creditor Notes have been discounted using an
imputed interest rate of 7.5%.

Management believes that the availability of financing pursuant to the
Credit Facility, together with the steps taken in response to recent operating
losses, including the sale of the SCPI warehouse, will provide adequate funding
for the Company's working capital, debt service and capital expenditure
requirements, including seasonal fluctuations, for at least the next twelve
months.


CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AND YEAR 2000

The Company has no significant outstanding commitments for capital
expenditures. In fiscal 1998, management undertook an extensive review and
evaluation of the Company's critical operating systems to determine compliance
with the year 2000 issue. It was determined that certain of SCPI's and Dowling's
current software programs are not year 2000 compliant, and accordingly,
management has developed a year 2000 plan (the "Year 2000 Plan") that addresses
this issue. The Year 2000 Plan includes the complete replacement of SCPI's
current operating system with an integrated system that is year 2000 compliant,
and for Dowling's provides for the re-writing of the computer code of its
customized system. The Year 2000 Plan schedules these events to be completed in
mid fiscal 1999, with total costs anticipated between $175,000 to $225,000.
Management is currently on schedule with the timetable set forth in the Year
2000 Plan. The Company is also contacting its suppliers to obtain their
assurance of year 2000 compliance.


TAX LOSS CARRY-FORWARDS

At February 28, 1998, SCPI and Oakhurst had net operating tax loss
carry-forwards (the "Tax Benefits") of approximately $154 million, which expire
in the years 2001 through 2012, and which shelter most of SCPI's and Oakhurst's
income from federal income taxes. A change in control of SCPI or Oakhurst in any
three-year period


-12-
14



exceeding 50% may lead to the loss of the majority of the Tax Benefits. In order
to reduce the likelihood of such a change of control occurring, SCPI's and
Oakhurst's Certificates of Incorporation include restrictions on the
registration of transfers of stock resulting in, or increasing, individual
holdings exceeding 4.5% of each company's common stock.

Since the regulations governing the Tax Benefits are highly complex and
may be changed from time to time, and since SCPI's and Oakhurst's attempts to
reduce the likelihood of a change of control occurring may not be successful,
management is unable to determine the likelihood of the continued availability
of the Tax Benefits. However, management believes that the Tax Benefits are
currently available in full and intends to take all appropriate steps to help
ensure that they remain available. Should the Tax Benefits become unavailable to
SCPI or Oakhurst, most future income of any consolidated affiliate would not be
shielded from federal taxation, thus reducing funds otherwise available for
corporate purposes (see Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements).


FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

From time to time the information provided by the Company or statements
made by its directors or employees may contain so-called "forward looking"
information that involves risks and uncertainties. In particular, statements
contained in Item 1 - "Business" and in this Item 7 - "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," which are not
historical facts (including, but not limited to statements concerning
anticipated sales, profit levels, customers and cash flows) but are forward
looking statements. The Company's actual future results may differ significantly
from those stated in any forward looking statements. Factors that may cause such
differences include, but are not limited to the factors discussed above as well
as the accuracy of the Company's internal estimates of revenue and operating
expense levels. Each of these factors and others are discussed from time to time
in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Operations for the year ended February 28, 1998 include the
consolidated results for Steel City Products and Dowling's, together with
administrative costs of SCPI and Oakhurst. As previously discussed, Puma was
sold effective May 31, 1997, and H&H was sold effective July 14, 1997.
Accordingly, only the net proceeds from these two subsidiaries, together with
recoveries on certain insurance claims related to H&H, have been included in
results of operations for the period ended February 28, 1998. Operations for the
period ended February 28, 1997 include the consolidated results for Steel City
Products, Dowling's, Puma and H&H, the administrative costs of SCPI and
Oakhurst, and a charge of approximately $3.5 million related to the disposals of
Puma and H&H.

FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1998 COMPARED WITH FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28,
1997

Consolidated sales for fiscal 1998 decreased by approximately $9.6
million, or by 22.9% when compared with the prior year, caused primarily by the
sale of Puma and H&H, which together produced sales in the prior year of $9.4
million. Sales at Dowling's reflected a decrease of approximately $165,000 when
compared to the prior year, due to a comparatively mild winter experienced in
Dowling's markets in fiscal 1998. Sales at SCPI decreased by $98,000. Sales to
existing automotive customers decreased by $2.8 million, primarily as a result
of bankruptcies, downsizing and competitive pressures faced by certain of SCPI's
customers. Partially offsetting this decline were sales by SCPI to new
automotive customers of approximately $1.5 million. Sales of non-food pet
supplies by SCPI were $1.4 million in the current year, compared with $157,000
last year. Sales of pet supplies first began in the second quarter of the prior
year, and new customers have been added in the current year.

Gross profits were approximately $6.2 million, or 19.2% of sales, in
the current year compared with approximately $9.5 million, or 22.6% of sales, in
the prior year. The lower gross profits were caused by the sale of Puma and H&H,
which contributed gross profits in the prior year of $3.4 million. The decrease
in gross margin was also attributable to Puma and H&H; gross margins for the
continuing businesses were consistent with the prior year. Despite slightly
lower levels of sales at SCPI, gross profits increased by approximately
$158,000, due primarily to a slight improvement in gross margin, together with
reductions in buying and occupancy expenses.


-13-
15



Gross profits at Dowling's decreased by approximately $15,000, due to lower
levels of sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998.

Operating, selling and administrative expenses decreased by
approximately $3.9 million when compared with the prior year, of which $3.8
million reflected the sale of Puma and H&H. The remaining reductions were
principally attributable to savings in corporate overhead expenses.

There was an increase in the provision for doubtful accounts of $63,000
related to the bankruptcies and liquidations of certain of SCPI's and Dowling's
customers.

The amortization of the excess of cost over net assets acquired
decreased by $254,000 in the current year, due to the write-off of goodwill in
fiscal 1997 as a result of the sale of Puma and H&H.

Interest expense decreased by $209,000 compared to the prior year due
to the sale of Puma and H&H and repayment of the Fixed Asset Loan in December
1997, as well as lower average borrowing levels by Dowling's and SCPI.

In fiscal 1998, SCPI sold its warehouse for a cash sale price of
approximately $2.8 million. The net gain resulting from the sale was
approximately $1.8 million.

Income tax expense decreased by approximately $2.1 million in the
current year, due primarily to a lower charge to deferred tax expense
attributable to adjustments in the valuation allowance of the deferred tax
asset.


FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1997 COMPARED WITH FISCAL YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 29,
1996

In fiscal 1997, consolidated sales decreased by approximately $5.4
million, or by 11.4%, when compared with fiscal 1996. The decrease was primarily
caused by the loss of two of SCPI's largest customers during fiscal 1996. These
two customers accounted for a decrease in sales in fiscal 1997 of approximately
$8.5 million. Sales to SCPI's existing customers also decreased by approximately
$780,000. Sales of car alarms, stereo accessories and cruise control equipment
decreased by approximately $285,000 due to the lower retail and wholesale
demand, and cellular phone revenues also decreased by approximately $770,000
because of a lower average commission rate this year combined with fewer
activations due to increased competition in this market. Sales of light truck
and van aftermarket accessories decreased by $915,000, due primarily to the loss
by Puma of two large converter customers in fiscal 1996.

The addition of new customers by SCPI and of new product lines by SCPI
and H&H together accounted for $2.9 million in new sales, partially offsetting
the sales decreases. Sales of radiators and related products by Dowling's
increased over fiscal 1996 by over $3 million, representing an increase of 26%,
attributed to an improved competitive situation in fiscal 1997 in Dowling's
markets, combined with favorable weather in the first quarter of fiscal 1997, an
increase in market share, and the addition of the Philadelphia G&O facility.

Other income decreased by $144,000, due to lower commission income
earned by Puma in fiscal 1997, lower auto show revenues earned by SCPI, due to a
smaller show in fiscal 1997, and because of interest on a tax refund from
Kentucky in fiscal 1996.

Gross profits were approximately $9.5 million, or 22.6% of sales, in
fiscal 1997 compared with $10 million, or 21.2% of sales, in fiscal 1996,
reflecting a decrease of $549,000. Lower levels of sales by all of the
subsidiaries except Dowling's contributed to gross lower profits of
approximately $1.9 million, but this was partially offset by improved gross
margins earned by all of the subsidiaries. The improved gross margin performance
was due to lower costs on certain product lines, and to the improved competitive
situation in certain of Dowling's markets.


-14-
16



Operating, selling and administrative expenses decreased by $379,000 in
fiscal 1997 when compared with fiscal 1996, which primarily reflected
management's efforts to reduce its work force and other expenses in reaction to
lower levels of sales.

There was a decrease of $508,000 in the provision for doubtful accounts
compared with fiscal 1996, when the Company recorded provisions for the
bankruptcies of several customers, including one of SCPI's largest customers.

Interest expense increased by $197,000 in fiscal 1997, due primarily to
higher average borrowings.

Income tax expense increased by approximately $1.2 million in fiscal
1997, due primarily to a higher charge to deferred tax expense in fiscal 1997
that resulted from an increase in the valuation allowance of the deferred tax
asset.



-15-
17



ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Independent Auditors' Report....................................................... F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets: February 28, 1998 and February 28, 1997............... F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended
February 28, 1998, February 28, 1997 and February 29, 1996....................... F-3

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the fiscal years ended
February 28, 1998, February 28, 1997 and February 29, 1996....................... F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended
February 28, 1998, February 28, 1997 and February 29, 1996........................ F-5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements......................................... F-6

Supplementary Financial Data:

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) for the fiscal years ended
February 28, 1998 and February 28, 1997......................................... F-16

Financial Statement Schedules for the fiscal years ended February 28,
1998, February 28, 1997 and February 29, 1996:

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts................................ F-18
</TABLE>



ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

NONE


-16-
18



PART III


ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

DIRECTORS.

The by-laws of the Company provide for such number of directors as is determined
from time to time by the Board of Directors. There are currently six directors
divided into three classes, each class having a term of three years.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DIRECTOR
NAME AGE CURRENT TERM EXPIRES SINCE CLASS
- -------------------- --- -------------------- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
John D. Abernathy 61 1999 1994 I
Robert M. Davies 47 1999 1991 I
Mark Auerbach 60 2000 1991 II
Bernard H. Frank 77 2000 1995 II
Joel S. Lever 46 1998 1994 III
Anthony N. Puma 34 1998 1995 III
</TABLE>


John D. Abernathy. Mr. Abernathy has been Executive Director of Patton Boggs,
L.L.P., a Washington DC law firm, since January 1995. From March 1991 to
February 1994 he was the Managing Director of Summit, Solomon & Feldesman, a New
York City law firm, and from July 1983 until June 1990, Mr. Abernathy was
Chairman and Chief Executive Partner of BDO Seidman, a public accounting firm.
Mr. Abernathy is a director of Barringer Technologies, Inc., a manufacturer of
high sensitivity analytical instruments for chemical sensing, and is also a
director of the Company's majority-owned subsidiary, Steel City Products, Inc.

Robert M. Davies. Mr. Davies was elected Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company in May 1997. Mr. Davies was a Vice President of Wexford
Capital Corporation, which acts as the investment manager to several private
investment funds from 1994 to March 1997. From November 1995 to March 1997 Mr.
Davies also served as Executive Vice President of Wexford Management LLC, a
private investment management company. From September 1993 to May 1994 he was a
Managing Director of Steinhardt Enterprises, Inc., an investment banking
company, and from 1987 to August 1993, he was Executive Vice President of The
Hallwood Group Incorporated, a merchant banking firm. Mr. Davies is a director
of the Company's majority owned, publicly traded subsidiary, Steel City
Products, Inc. Mr. Davies also serves as a director of Industrial Acoustics
Company, Inc., a New York based engineered products group specializing in noise
control products and systems, and of Maxicare Health Plans, Inc., a health
maintenance organization based in California.

Mark Auerbach. Mr. Auerbach was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company from December 1995 to May 1997. He has been Chief Financial
Officer of the Company and its majority owned subsidiary, Steel City Products,
Inc., since December 1995. He has also been Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer since April 1993 of Central Lewmar, L.P., a fine paper
merchant. From September 1992 until April 1993, he was a partner of Marron
Capital, L.P., an investment banking company. Prior to that, he was President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Implant Technology, Inc., a
manufacturer of artificial hip systems, from 1990 to 1992. He is a director of
Pharmaceutical Resources, Inc., a generic drug manufacturer, and of the
Company's majority owned subsidiary, Steel City Products, Inc. Mr. Auerbach is a
certified public accountant.

Bernard H. Frank. Mr. Frank has been Executive Vice President and Chief
Operating Officer of the Company since May 1994 and is a founder of the
Company's majority owned, publicly traded subsidiary, Steel City Products, Inc.,
of which he has been Chief Executive Officer and a director since 1993, Chairman
since 1994 and an executive officer for more than the last five years.


-17-
19



Joel S. Lever. Mr. Lever is a senior member of the law firm of Kurzman &
Eisenberg, LLP and has been a partner since 1984. Mr. Lever serves as Chairman
of the firm's Corporate Department, where he specializes in transactional
business matters, mergers and acquisitions, art and entertainment law and the
sale and acquisition of commercial assets. Mr. Lever is a director of the
Company's majority-owned subsidiary, Steel City Products, Inc., as well as a
director of several private companies.

Anthony N. Puma. Mr. Puma is Chairman and founder (in 1988) of Puma Products,
Inc., which was acquired by the Company in October 1994. Before that, Mr. Puma
held various positions with SDI Corporation, a distributor of accessories to the
small truck and van conversion markets. In May 1997, the Company sold Puma
Products back to Mr. Puma.


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

The following are the names, ages, positions and a brief description of the
business experience during the last five years of the executive officers of the
Company and its subsidiaries who are not also directors of the Company, all of
whom serve until they resign or are removed by the Board of Directors that
appointed them. The business histories of executive officers who are also
directors (Messrs. Auerbach, Davies and Frank) are set forth above under the
heading "Directors."

Roger M. Barzun (56): Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel. Mr.
Barzun has been Secretary and General Counsel of the Company since August 1991
and a Senior Vice President since May 1994. He is also Secretary and General
Counsel of SCPI. Mr. Barzun has been a lawyer since 1968 and is a member of the
New York and Massachusetts bars.

Terrance W. Allan (44) : Executive Vice President, Steel City Products, Inc. Mr.
Allan has been an officer of the Company's publicly traded subsidiary, Steel
City Products, Inc. ("SCPI"), for more than the last five years. He was elected
Executive Vice President in January 1993.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Company's
officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class
of the Company's equity securities ("Insiders") to file reports of ownership and
certain changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to
furnish the Company with copies of those reports.

Based solely on a review of those reports and amendments thereto furnished to
the Company during its most recent fiscal year or written representations by
Insiders that no Forms 5 were required to be filed, the Company believes that
during the fiscal year ended February 28, 1998, all Section 16(a) filing
requirements applicable to the Company's Insiders were satisfied.


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

This item contains information about compensation, stock options and awards,
employment arrangements and other information concerning the executive officers
of the Company and of its largest subsidiary, Steel City Products, Inc.
("SCPI").


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE.

The following table sets forth all compensation for the 1998, 1997 and 1996
fiscal years allocated or paid on or before February 28,1998 to those who served
as the Company's Chief Executive Officer during fiscal 1998 and to the only
other executive officers of the Company who were serving at the end of the 1998
fiscal year for services rendered in all capacities to the Company and its
subsidiaries. Neither of such other executive officer had


-18-
20



compensation exceeding $100,000 in 1998. Also included is the compensation paid
to an executive officer of SCPI who is not, however, an executive officer of the
Company.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LONG TERM
ANNUAL COMPENSATION COMPENSATION
------------------------------------------ ---------------------------
OTHER SECURITIES ALL OTHER
ANNUAL UNDERLYING COMPENSA-
FISCAL SALARY BONUS COMPENSATION OPTIONS/SARS TION
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR ($) ($) ($)* (#) ($)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Mark Auerbach (1) 1998 10,000 -- -- 3,000 --
Chairman President & 1997 100,000 -- -- -- --
Chief Executive Officer 1996 24,000 -- -- 100,000 --

Robert M. Davies (1) 1998 50,000 -- -- 203,000 --
Chairman President &
Chief Executive Officer

Bernard H. Frank (2) 1998 50,050 7,364 -- -- 13,908 (3)
Executive Vice President & 1997 50,243 16,000 -- 68,327 13,908
Chief Operating Officer 1996 82,775 -- -- -- 19,151

Roger M. Barzun 1998 53,750 -- 6,312 20,000 --
Senior Vice President and 1997 53,750 -- 6,312 -- --
General Counsel, Secretary 1996 54,135 10,000 6,312 -- --

Terrance W. Allan (4) 1998 115,001 15,000 -- -- --
Executive Vice President SCPI 1997 126,490 14,000 -- 24,333 --
1996 106,160 -- -- 5,000 4,797
</TABLE>

- ---------------
* Excludes perquisites and other personal benefits if the aggregate amount of
such items of compensation was less than the lesser of either $50,000 or
10% of the total annual salary and bonus of the named executive officer. In
the case of Mr. Barzun, the amount listed represents the cost to the
Company of providing for his use a company-leased vehicle.

1. Mr. Auerbach became Chief Executive Officer of the Company in December 1995
and served in that capacity as a consultant to the Company until May 1997,
when Mr. Davies was elected Chief Executive Officer as his successor.

2. Mr. Frank, who is also Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SCPI, is
compensated only by SCPI, except with respect to stock options and stock
awards.

3. This amount consists of $6,504, $5,508 and $1,896 that Mr. Frank received
under three substantially identical agreements amended in 1987 in
consideration of the waiver by Mr. Frank of his bankruptcy claims for
annuity rights in SCPI's predecessor's bankruptcy.

4. Mr. Allan is compensated only by SCPI, except with respect to stock options
and stock awards.

----------------------


-19-
21



OPTION GRANTS IN THE LAST FISCAL YEAR.

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to stock options
granted to the individuals named in the Summary Compensation Table, above,
during the fiscal year ended February 28, 1998.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
VALUE AT ASSUMED
ANNUAL RATES OF STOCK
PRICE
APPRECIATION
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS FOR OPTION TERM (3)
-------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------
PERCENT OF
TOTAL OPTIONS
NUMBER OF GRANTED TO
SECURITIES EMPLOYEES IN EXERCISE EXPI-
UNDERLYING FISCAL YEAR PRICE RATION 5% 10%
NAME OPTIONS (%) ($)(2) DATE ($) ($)
- ------------------- ------------ ------------- -------- -------- --------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
MARK AUERBACH 3,000(1) 2.15 1.219 05/01/07 1,886 4,781
ROBERT M. DAVIES 3,000(1) 2.15 1.00 05/01/07 1,866 4,781
50,000(4) 35.8 1.00 05/27/07 31,444 79,687
100,000(5) 71.6 0.875 01/13/08 34,667 107,030
50,000(6) 35.8 0.875 01/13/08 17,333 53,515
BERNARD H. FRANK -- -- -- -- -- --
ROGER M. BARZUN 20,000(7) 14.3 0.875 02/04/08 11,005 27,890
TERRANCE W. ALLAN -- -- -- -- -- --

</TABLE>

- --------------

1. This option became exercisable at the date of grant.

2. The original exercise price per share of each option was equal to the
market value on the date of grant.

3. The "potential realizable value" is calculated based on the term of the
option (ten years) at its date of grant. It is calculated by assuming that
the stock price on the date of grant appreciates at the indicated annual
rate compounded annually for the entire term of the option. However, the
optionee will not actually be able to realize any benefit from the option
unless the market value of the common stock in fact increases over the
option price.

4. This option becomes exercisable on May 27, 1998.

5. This option becomes exercisable at the earlier to occur of (i) a change in
control of the company; (ii) the achievement of a substantial realization
of the value of the company's net operating loss carryforwards; or (iii)
the ninth anniversary of the grant date.

6. This option becomes exercisable in full from and after May 29, 1998, but
immediately terminates if Mr. Davies' consulting agreement with the
corporation dated May 27, 1997, is terminated by the company for cause.

7. This option becomes exercisable in four equal installments, on the grant
date and the first three anniversaries of the grant date.

----------------------


-20-
22



AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN THE LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION
VALUES.

The following table sets forth certain information based upon the fair market
value per share of the Common Stock at February 27, 1998 ($1.125), the day
closest to the Company's February 28, 1998 fiscal year end on which trades were
made, with respect to stock options held at that date by each of the individuals
named in the Summary Compensation Table, above. The "value" of unexercised
in-the-money options is the difference between the market value of the Common
Stock subject to the options at February 28, 1998 and the exercise (purchase)
price of the option shares. During fiscal 1998, there were no option exercises
by any of these individuals.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
VALUE OF UNEXERCISED IN-THE-
NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNDERLYING MONEY OPTIONS AT FISCAL YEAR
UNEXERCISED OPTIONS AT FISCAL YEAR END END
(#) ($)
--------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
NAME EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE EXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ---- ----------------- ------------------- --------------- -----------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Mark Auerbach 126,996 -- 375 --
Robert M. Davies 26,996 200,000 375 43,750
Bernard H. Frank 68,327 -- -- --
Roger M. Barzun 21,000 15,000 1,250 3,750
Terrance W. Allan 28,081 1,250 -- --
</TABLE>


COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS.

All non-employee directors receive annual stock option grants on May 1 each year
under the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan covering 3,000 shares of
Common Stock, which are immediately exercisable at an option price equal to the
market value on the date of grant. During fiscal 1998, each non-employee who did
not otherwise receive compensation from the Company received an annual fee of
$10,000, but no meeting fees. Commencing March 1, 1998, the Company will pay to
each such non-employee director an annual director's fee of $12,500 and, if he
serves as chairman of at least one committee of the Board of Directors, an
additional annual director's fee of $2,500. All fees are paid quarterly in
arrears. All directors are entitled to reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses
incurred in attending meetings

On January 13, 1998 the Board of Directors granted ten-year stock options to
Messrs. Abernathy (65,000 shares), Davies (100,000 shares) and Lever (65,000
shares). The vesting of these options is dependent upon the Company achieving
certain financial objectives; however, in any event, they vest on the ninth
anniversary of the grant date. See also "Employment Contracts and Termination of
Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements," following, for a description of
compensation arrangements during fiscal 1998 between the Company and Messrs.
Auerbach and Davies.


EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS AND TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL
ARRANGEMENTS.

Mr. Auerbach. In fiscal 1998, Mr. Auerbach was compensated as Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company under an amended 1995
consulting agreement with the Company at the rate of $2,500 per month for the
period March through June 1997, when the agreement terminated. On May 27, 1997
Mr. Auerbach resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer, but remained
Chief Financial Officer of the Company at his then current rate of compensation.
Mr. Auerbach was also entitled under the agreement to reimbursement of his
Company-related business expenses. The agreement also provided for the grant to
him of a ten-year stock option to purchase 100,000 shares of Common Stock
exercisable in two equal installments at $1.25 and $2.50 per share,
respectively, on the December 19, 1995 grant date and the first anniversary of
the grant date.

Mr. Davies. Mr. Davies was elected Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company in May 1997 to succeed Mr. Auerbach. He is compensated at
the rate of $5,000 per month under a one-year consulting agreement and receives
reimbursement of expenses incurred by him in carrying out his duties and
responsibilities. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has granted to Mr.
Davies ten-year stock options at market to purchase


-21-
23



100,000 shares of Common Stock, in the aggregate, under the Company's 1994
Omnibus Stock Plan. The options become exercisable in full at the end of May
1998.

Mr. Frank and Mr. Allan. SCPI has three-year employment agreements with each of
Messrs. Frank and Allan (sometimes hereinafter referred to as the "executive")
commencing September 1, 1993 that provide for base salaries of $100,000 (Mr.
Frank) and $96,200 increasing to $115,050 (Mr. Allan). The agreements provide
for the payment of annual management bonuses based upon the defined profits of
SCPI's operating division, with Mr. Frank entitled to a minimum bonus of fifteen
percent of base salary. The aggregate amount of such management bonuses payable
each year to the executives and to all other SCPI executives is not to exceed 8%
of such defined profits and the allocation thereof is made by the Compensation
Committee of SCPI based on recommendations of Mr. Frank as Chief Executive
Officer of SCPI. Mr. Allan is also entitled to an executive bonus calculated as
a percentage of defined annual profits of SCPI that exceed $2,000,000. The
Agreements were extended in September 1996.

In the event of non-renewal of the agreements, the executive is entitled to an
aliquot portion of the bonuses he would have earned during the year of
non-renewal, since the contract year does not coincide with the fiscal year of
SCPI. The agreements also provide that if the executive's employment terminates
by reason of his death or disability, he is entitled to the greater of two
years' salary (one year for Mr. Allan) or the salary for the balance of the term
of the agreement and the minimum bonus for such period in the case of Mr. Frank
and the management bonus that would otherwise have been paid in the case of Mr.
Allan. If the executive's employment is otherwise terminated without cause, he
is entitled to his salary and bonuses for the greater of one year or the balance
of the term of the agreement.

The agreements provide for car allowances, and the executives are eligible to
participate in all defined contribution plans, survivor and supplemental
benefits, short and long-term disability benefits, and all other benefit plans
and perquisites available now or in the future to the senior executives of SCPI.

The agreements also provide for certain termination rights in the event of a
change in control of SCPI. Change in control is defined to include certain
changes in the make-up of the SCPI board of directors or a sale of SCPI's assets
or business. Each executive has the right to terminate his employment within a
defined period (ranging up to one year) following a change in control and (i) to
be paid his base salary for a period of up to 24 months following such
termination; (ii) to continue to receive for a like period the benefits that he
is entitled to receive under his agreement and (iii) to be paid 25% of base
salary in lieu of all bonus entitlement. The agreements also provide for
substantially the same payments and benefits in the event the executive's
employment is terminated by SCPI without cause as a result of a change in
control. In the event of any termination other than for cause, or voluntary
resignation in the absence of a change in control, the executive's options
become fully exercisable for a period of seven months following termination. If
a change in control had occurred on May 1, 1998, and if each of Messrs. Frank
and Allan had exercised his rights of termination, payments by SCPI would have
been approximately $535,000 in the aggregate.

Mr. Frank. In fiscal 1997, in light of SCPI's financial performance, Mr. Frank
voluntarily reduced his annual salary by 50%. In February 1998, Mr. Frank's
annual base salary was set by agreement at $50,000; he granted participation in
a deferred compensation program commencing March 1, 1998 providing for the
payment to him of $5,000 per month for twenty-four months to compensate him for
the portion of his salary voluntarily foregone by him; and commencing March 1,
1998, Mr. Frank was made eligible to participate in a bonus program pursuant to
which the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors in its discretion and
after reviewing the Corporation's performance and cash position may grant to him
on a quarterly basis a bonus not to exceed $25,000 in the aggregate in any one
fiscal year.

Mr. Frank also receives compensation of $13,908 per year, in the aggregate,
under three substantially identical agreements amended in 1987 in consideration
of the waiver by Mr. Frank of his bankruptcy claims for annuity rights in SCPI's
predecessor's bankruptcy. The amended agreements provide for payments to be made
for a period of fifteen years subsequent to January 1988 of $6,504, $5,508 and
$1,896 per year for the three agreements, respectively.

Mr. Barzun. Mr. Barzun is compensated pursuant to a December 1992 employment
agreement, as amended, under which he provides general counsel services to the
Company on a part-time basis. Under the agreement, Mr. Barzun is entitled to a
minimum salary of $56,250; participation in benefit plans made available to
other executives; the use of a Company-leased automobile; reimbursement of
Company-related business expenses; and


-22-
24



payment in a lump sum of six months' salary in the event his employment is
terminated without cause. In January 1996 Mr. Barzun agreed to a 4% pay
reduction in view of the Company's financial condition.


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION.

During fiscal 1998, no member of the Compensation Committee or Stock Plans
Committee was an employee of the Company or any or its subsidiaries. Mr. Frank
serves on the Compensation Committee of Steel City Products, Inc. ("SCPI") and
is a director of SCPI and of the Company.

In October 1994 the Company acquired the capital stock of Puma Products from its
founder, Anthony N. Puma, who is currently a director of the Company. In May
1997 the Company sold the capital stock of Puma Products back to Mr. Puma.

The Board of Directors intends that any transactions with officers, directors
and affiliates will be entered into on terms no less favorable to the Company
than could be obtained from unrelated third parties and that they will be
approved by a majority of the directors of the Company who are independent and
disinterested with respect to the proposed transaction. No such transactions
occurred in fiscal 1997. See also "Compensation of Directors" and "Employment
Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements,"
above.


REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION IN THE 1998 FISCAL YEAR.

This report has been prepared by the Compensation Committee and the Stock Plans
Committee of the Board of Directors and addresses the Company's compensation
policies with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and executive officers of
the Company in general for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1998. All members
of the Committees are non-employee directors. The Company has no operating
business of its own, but is a holding company of operating businesses. The
Company has elected to include in the Summary Compensation Table, above, certain
information concerning an executive officer of the Company's largest subsidiary,
Steel City Products, Inc.,("SCPI") who is not, however, an executive officer of
the Company and accordingly, a discussion of his compensation is included here.
Reference is made generally to the information under the heading "Employment
Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements,"
above.

Compensation Policy. The overall intent in respect of executive officers is to
establish levels of compensation that provide appropriate incentives in order to
command high levels of individual performance and thereby increase the value of
the Company to its stockholders, and that are sufficiently competitive to
attract and retain the skills required for the success and profitability of the
Company. The principal components of executive compensation are salary, bonus
and stock options.

Chief Executive Officer's Compensation. The consulting fees paid and the stock
options granted to the Company's Chief Executive Officers in 1998 are the result
of written consulting agreements that were negotiated between Messrs. Auerbach
and Davies (who succeeded Mr. Auerbach as Chief Executive Officer in May 1997)
and the Company and that are described above under the heading "Employment
Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements."
Compensation was determined to be appropriate by the members of the Committees
serving at the time based on the non-full-time nature of the position; the
expertise and responsibility that the position requires; the Chief Executive
Officer's prior financial and accounting experience in former employments; and
the subjective judgement of the members of a reasonable level of compensation.

Other Executive Officers. Mr. Frank is an Executive Officer of the Company, but
receives all of his compensation in his capacity of Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of SCPI. Mr. Barzun is compensated under his employment agreement with
the Company described above. Mr. Allan is included in the Company's disclosures
relating to compensation because of his importance to the success of the Company
on a consolidated basis. Each of their written employment agreements was
reviewed and approved by the Company's Compensation Committee and in the case of
Mr. Allan, by the SCPI Compensation Committee.

Salary. Since all of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation
Table are long-term employees of the Company and/or SCPI and one of them is a
founder of the original business, their salaries in 1998 were based on the level
of their prior salaries and the subjective judgement of the members of the
Company's and SCPI's Compensation Committees as to the value of the executive's
past contribution and potential future contribution to the business.


-23-
25



Bonuses. Bonuses payable to Messrs. Frank and Allan under their employment
agreements consist of an Annual Management Bonus, and in the case of Mr. Allan,
an additional Annual Executive Bonus. The Annual Management Bonus is paid from a
pool of funds equal to 8% of SCPI's consolidated net income before interest,
taxes, depreciation, LIFO adjustments and amortization, prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied. The amount
of the bonus pool allocation is based on Mr. Frank's recommendations to SCPI's
Compensation Committee. Mr. Frank's recommendations, in turn, are based on his
subjective judgement, formed by over forty years experience with the business,
of the performance of each officer during the preceding year. Mr. Frank is
entitled to a minimum Annual Management Bonus of 15% of salary provided that
SCPI has earnings for the year in question. Bonuses paid in fiscal 1998 related
to earnings in the prior year.

The Annual Executive Bonus for Mr. Allan is equal to 1% of the amount by which
SCPI's consolidated net income (defined in the same manner as for the Annual
Management Bonus) exceeds $2,000,000. SCPI's defined net income did not exceed
the $2,000,000 threshold in fiscal 1998 and accordingly no Annual Executive
Bonuses were paid.

The bonus percentages and amounts contained in the executive's employment
agreements are based on the executive's years of service, his perceived
importance to the profitability of SCPI, and the subjective judgement of members
of the SCPI Compensation Committee as to the best balance between salary and
bonus, and what is fair and reasonable. No bonuses were paid to any other
executive officers of the Company during fiscal 1998.


Stock Options. The Committees believe that stock ownership by executive officers
is important in aligning management's and stockholders' interests in the
enhancement of stockholder value over the long term. The 1998 grant to an
executive officer (other than the Chief Executive Officer) was based on the
subjective judgement of the Stock Plans Committee as to what constituted an
appropriate option grant in light of the executive's performance since the last
option granted to him. The exercise price of stock option grants to date is
equal to the market price of the Common Stock on the date of grant.

Compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m). Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code (enacted in 1993) generally disallows a tax deduction to
public companies for compensation over $1 million paid to its chief executive
officer and its four other most highly compensated executives. The Company's
compensation payable to any one executive officer (including potential income
from outstanding stock options) is currently and for the foreseeable future
unlikely to reach that threshold. In addition, because of the significant net
operating loss carryforwards of SCPI, the deductibility of compensation payments
is not currently an issue. However, should circumstances change, the
Compensation Committee will study the matter and make recommendations to the
Board.

The Compensation Committee The Stock Plans Committee
Joel S. Lever John D. Abernathy
John D. Abernathy Joel S. Lever


----------------------



-24-
26



The following Performance Graph and the foregoing Report of the Compensation
Committee on Executive Compensation in this Item 11 are not and shall not be
deemed incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any
such filings to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


PERFORMANCE GRAPH.

The following graph compares the percentage change in the Company's cumulative
total stockholder return on Common Stock for the last five years with (i) the
Dow Jones Global US Market Index (a broad market index), and (ii) the Dow Jones
Retailers - Other Specialty Index, a group of companies whose marketing strategy
is focused on a limited product line, such as automotive parts, over the same
period. Both indices are published in the Wall Street Journal.

The returns are calculated assuming the value of an investment in the Company's
stock and each index of $100 on the Company's February 28, 1993 fiscal year end
and that all dividends were reinvested; however, the Company paid no dividends
during the periods shown. The graph lines merely connect the beginning and end
of the measuring periods and do not reflect fluctuations between those dates.
The historical stock performance shown on the graph is not intended to, and may
not be indicative of, future stock performance.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Oakhurst Company, Inc. 100.00 125.00 168.75 59.35 56.25 56.25
DJ Global US 100.00 107.88 115.76 155.97 195.99 265.75
Dow Jones Other Speciality 100.00 97.87 94.23 93.12 110.77 169.42
</TABLE>




-25-
27



ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL HOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT.


This item sets forth certain information regarding ownership of the Company's
common stock at May 1, 1998. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes, the
Company believes that the beneficial owners of the Common Stock listed in the
tables, based on information furnished by such owners, have sole investment and
voting power with respect to the shares of common stock shown as beneficially
owned by them. The numbers and percentages assume for each person or group
listed the exercise of all stock options held by such person or group that are
exercisable within 60 days of May 1, 1998, in accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, but not the exercise of such stock
options owned by any other person.


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS.

The following table sets forth each person known by the Company (other than
management) to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding common stock of
the Company.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AND ADDRESS NUMBER OF SHARES OF
OF BENEFICIAL OWNER COMMON STOCK PERCENTAGE OF CLASS
- ------------------- ------------ -------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund(1) 289,000 9.0%
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109

Special Situations Fund, L.P.(2) 289,000 9.0%
153 East 53rd Street
New York, NY 10022
</TABLE>


- --------------

(1) Fidelity Capital Appreciation Fund is a portfolio of the Fidelity Capital
Trust, an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940.

(2) By agreement with the Company dated June 25, 1990, as amended, Special
Situations Fund, L.P. (formerly Prudential-Bache Special Situations Fund,
L.P.) agreed not to increase its beneficial ownership of the Common Stock
of the Company or Steel City Products, Inc. ("SCPI") above 8.2% of the then
outstanding shares, except in transactions to which the Company or SCPI, as
the case may be, is a party or under certain other circumstances.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT.

The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of the
Common Stock by each director, each individual named in the Summary Compensation
Table in Item 11, above, and by all directors, all such named individuals, and
all executive officers of the Company as a group.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER SHARES OF COMMON STOCK PERCENTAGE OF CLASS
- ------------------------ ---------------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C>
John D. Abernathy 41,996(1) 1.3%
Mark Auerbach 126,996(2) 3.8%
Robert M. Davies 209,992(3) 6.3%
Bernard H. Frank 85,134(4) 2.7%
Joel S. Lever 72,815(5) 2.3%
Anthony N. Puma 266,667 8.3%
Roger M. Barzun 27,160(6) *
Terrance W. Allan 28,581(7) *
</TABLE>


-26-
28


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER SHARES OF COMMON STOCK PERCENTAGE OF CLASS
- ------------------------ ---------------------- -------------------
<S> <C> <C>
All directors and executive
officers as a group (8 persons): 859,341 (8) 22.6%
</TABLE>

- --------------

* Less than 1%

1. This number includes 26,996 shares issuable under outstanding stock
options that are presently exercisable at prices ranging from $1.00 to
$3.375 per share.

2. These shares are issuable under outstanding stock options that are
presently exercisable at prices ranging from $1.00 to $3.375 per share.

3. This number includes 144,992 shares issuable under outstanding stock
options that are exercisable within 60 days of May 1, 1998 at prices
ranging from $1.00 to $3.37 per share.

4. This number includes 68,327 shares issuable under outstanding stock
options that are presently exercisable at prices ranging from $1.25 to
$2.00 per share.

5. This number includes 26,996 shares issuable under outstanding stock
options that are presently exercisable at prices ranging from $1.00 to
$3.375 per share.

6. This number includes 21,000 shares issuable under outstanding stock
options that are exercisable within 60 days of May 1, 1998 at prices
ranging from $0.875 to $2.00 per share.

7. This number includes 28,081 shares issuable under outstanding stock
options that are exercisable within 60 days of May 1, 1998 at prices
ranging from $1.25 to $2.00 per share. Mr. Allan is an executive
officer of the Company's subsidiary, Steel City Products, Inc.

8. This number includes 443,388 shares issuable under outstanding stock
options that are exercisable within 60 days of May 1, 1998 at prices
ranging from $0.875 to $3.375 per share.


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

Reference is made to information contained under the headings "Compensation of
Directors," "Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and
Change-in-Control Arrangements," and "Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation," in Item 11, above.

----------------------


-27-
29



PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K


(a) Documents filed as a part of this report.

1. Financial Statements:

Independent Auditors' Report

Consolidated Balance Sheets: February 28, 1998 and February 28,
1997

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years
ended February 28, 1998, February 28, 1997 and
February 29, 1996

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the fiscal
years ended February 28, 1998, February 28, 1997 and
February 29, 1996

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years
ended February 28, 1998, February 28, 1997 and
February 29, 1996

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Supplementary Financial Data:

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) for the
fiscal years ended February 28, 1998 and February 28,
1997

2. The following Financial Statement Schedules for the fiscal years
ended February 28, 1998, February 28, 1997 and February 29, 1996 are
submitted herewith:

Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other schedules are omitted because they are not
applicable or the required information is shown in the
financial statements or the notes thereto.


3. Exhibits

Exhibit No. Description

2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 20, 1991 (filed as
Appendix A to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus dated April 16, 1991
of the Company and Steel City Products, Inc.).

3.1 Restated and Amended Certificate of Incorporation (filed as
Exhibit 3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal quarter ended August 31, 1996).

3.2 By-laws - as amended through January 13, 1998 - filed herewith.

4.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 20, 1991 (see
Exhibit 2, above).


-28-
30



4.2 Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock dated as of February 10, 1998 - filed herewith.

*10.1 Form of Option Agreement dated August 29, 1991 with directors
and executive officers (filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's
Annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29,
1992).

10.2 Agreement dated June 11, 1991 with Prudential-Bache Special
Situations Fund (filed as Exhibit 10(q) to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Steel City Products, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
March 3, 1990).

10.3 Purchase and Sale Agreement relating to the acquisition of
Dowling's Fleet Service Company, Inc. by Oakhurst Capital, Inc.,
also containing employment agreements with Robert Keane and
Joseph Quattrochi (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 27,
1994).

10.4 Lease agreements by and between James Dowling and Dowling's Fleet
Service Company, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28,
1995).

*10.5 The 1994 Omnibus Stock Plan with form of option agreement (filed
as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended February 28, 1995).

*10.6 The 1994 Non-Employee director Stock Option Plan with form of
option agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1995).

10.7 Loan and Security Agreement; Schedule to Loan and Security
Agreement; Secured Promissory Note with FINOVA Capital
Corporation all dated March 28, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended February 29, 1996).

10.8 Open-End Mortgage between Steel City Products, Inc. and FINOVA
Capital Corporation dated March 28, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.18
to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended February 29, 1996).

10.9 Consulting Agreement with Bryanston Management, Ltd, dated as of
December 19, 1995 (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 1996).

*10.10 Employment Agreement and Form of Promissory Note between
Dowling's Fleet Service, Co., Inc. and Joseph B. Quattrochi dated
as of March 1, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28,
1997).

*10.11 Employment Agreement and Form of Promissory Note between
Dowling's Fleet Service, Co., Inc. and Robert M. Keane dated as
of March 1, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1997).

*10.12 Employment Agreement between Laurence D. Finman and Oakhurst
Management Co., dated as of March 1, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.24
to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended February 28, 1997).


-29-
31




10.13 Non-Competition Agreement between G&O Sales Company and Arthur
Gruber dated as of March 12, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.25 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 28, 1997).

10.14 Amendment to Consulting Agreement and Amended Non-Qualified Stock
Option Agreement between Mark Auerbach and Oakhurst Company, Inc.
dated as of October 1, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 28, 1997).

10.15 Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement between Anthony N. Puma, Puma
Products, Inc. and Oakhurst Company, Inc., dated as of June 10,
1997 (filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1997).

10.16 Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement between James Stein, H&H
Distributors, Inc. and Oakhurst Company, Inc., dated as of July
14, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended May 31, 1997).

10.17 Agreement of Sale and Purchase by and between Steel City
Products, Inc. and Bearing Service Company of Pennsylvania dated
as of August 18, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter ended August
31, 1997).

10.18 Second and Third Amendments to the Loan and Security Agreement
between Oakhurst and its subsidiaries and FINOVA Capital
Corporation, dated effective June 1, 1997 and October 31, 1997,
respectively - filed herewith.

10.19 Lease agreement between Regional Industrial Development
Corporation and Steel City Products, Inc. dated as of - filed
herewith.

11 Statement of re-computation of per-share earnings - filed
herewith.

21 Subsidiaries at February 28, 1998:

Steel City Products, Inc. - Delaware
Dowling's Fleet Service Company, Inc. - New York
Oakhurst Management Corporation - Texas

23 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP - filed herewith.

27 Financial Data Schedule (EDGAR transmission only) - filed
herewith.

- -----------------
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

There were no reports on Form 8-K filed during the Company's fourth
fiscal quarter ended February 28, 1997.


-30-
32


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

OAKHURST COMPANY, INC.

Date: May 27, 1998 By: /s/ Robert M. Davies
------------------------
Robert M. Davies
President and Chief Executive
Officer
(duly authorized officer)

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each individual whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints each of Robert M. Davies, Bernard H. Frank and
Roger M. Barzun jointly and severally his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and
agent with full powers of substitution for him and in his name, place and stead
in any and all capacities to sign on his behalf, individually and in each
capacity stated below and to file any and all amendments to this Annual Report
on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents and each of them full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and
about the premises as fully as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or
their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
thereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURES TITLES DATE
---------- ------ ----
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ Robert M. Davies Chairman of the Board, May 27, 1998
- ---------------------------------------- President and Chief Executive
Robert M. Davies Officer



/s/ Mark Auerbach Chief Financial Officer May 27, 1998
- ---------------------------------------- and Director (principal financial
Mark Auerbach and accounting officer)



/s/ Bernard H. Frank Chief Operating Officer May 27, 1998
- ---------------------------------------- Director
Bernard H. Frank


/s/ John D. Abernathy Director May 27, 1998
- ----------------------------------------
John D. Abernathy


/s/ Joel S. Lever Director May 27, 1998
- ----------------------------------------
Joel S. Lever


/s/ Anthony N. Puma Director May 27, 1998
- ----------------------------------------
Anthony N. Puma
</TABLE>




-31-
33
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Oakhurst Company, Inc.:


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Oakhurst
Company, Inc. and subsidiaries as of February 28, 1998 and 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the years ended February 28, 1998, February 28, 1997 and February 29, 1996. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 14(a)(2). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Oakhurst Company, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of February 28, 1998 and 1997, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for the years ended February 28, 1998, February
28, 1997, and February 29, 1996 in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
- ------------------------------
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
May 22, 1998





-F1-
34

OAKHURST COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ASSETS FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 28,
1998 1997
------------ -----------
<S> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash .......................................................................... $ 47 $ 39
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance of $461 and $555, respectively ...... 4,026 3,882
Other receivables ............................................................. 223 483
Inventories ................................................................... 6,167 5,687
Other ......................................................................... 226 370
-------- --------
Total current assets ......................................... 10,689 10,461
-------- --------

Property and equipment, at cost ................................................... 1,782 2,839
Less accumulated depreciation ................................................. (1,098) (1,311)
-------- --------
684 1,528
-------- --------

Deferred tax asset, less valuation allowance of $52,360
and $51,300, respectively ..................................................... -- 1,000
Excess of cost over net assets acquired, net ...................................... 2,275 2,468
Other assets ...................................................................... 383 450
-------- --------
2,658 3,918
-------- --------
$ 14,031 $ 15,907
======== ========


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable .............................................................. $ 6,392 $ 6,106
Accrued compensation .......................................................... 519 394
Current maturities of long-term obligations ................................... 646 953
Current maturities of long-term obligations, related parties .................. 88 88
Accrued interest .............................................................. 76 88
Other accrued expenses ........................................................ 249 417
-------- --------
Total current liabilities .................................... 7,970 8,046
-------- --------

Long-term obligations:
Long-term debt ................................................................ 4,058 5,344
Long-term debt, related parties ............................................... 198 286
Other long-term obligations ................................................... 62 86
-------- --------
4,318 5,716
-------- --------

Commitments and contingencies......................................................

Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.01; authorized 1,000,000 shares, none issued .... -- --
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; authorized 14,000,000
shares; issued 3,207,053 and 3,201,144 shares, respectively ................ 32 32
Additional paid-in capital .................................................... 46,535 46,529
Deficit (Reorganized on August 26, 1989) ...................................... (44,823) (44,415)
Treasury stock, at cost, 207 common shares .................................... (1) (1)
-------- --------
Total stockholders' equity ................................... 1,743 2,145
-------- --------
$ 14,031 $ 15,907
======== ========
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.



-F2-
35

OAKHURST COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 29,
1998 1997 1996
------------ ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Sales ...................................................... $ 32,307 $ 41,928 $ 47,339
Other income ............................................... 286 327 471
----------- ----------- -----------
32,593 42,255 47,810
----------- ----------- -----------

Cost of goods sold, including occupancy and
buying expenses ........................................ 26,119 32,459 37,321
Operating, selling and administrative expenses ............. 6,705 10,573 10,952
Provision for doubtful accounts ............................ 165 102 610
Amortization of excess of cost over net assets acquired .... 194 448 439
Interest expense ........................................... 634 843 646
Income from the sale of real estate ........................ (1,760) -- --
(Income) loss on assets held for sale -
H&H and Puma (see Note 2) .............................. (72) 3,493 --
----------- ----------- -----------
31,985 47,918 49,968
----------- ----------- -----------

Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes ......................... 608 (5,663) (2,158)
----------- ----------- -----------

Current income tax (expense) benefit ....................... (16) (12) 115
Deferred income tax expense ................................ (1,000) (3,086) (2,000)
----------- ----------- -----------
(1,016) (3,098) (1,885)
----------- ----------- -----------
Loss from continuing operations ............................ (408) (8,761) (4,043)

Discontinued retail operations:
Income on disposal ..................................... -- -- 65
----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss ................................................... $ (408) $ (8,761) $ (3,978)
=========== =========== ===========

Basic and diluted per share amounts:
Loss from continuing operations ........................ $ (0.13) $ (2.74) $ (1.27)
Income from discontinued operations .................... -- -- 0.02
----------- ----------- -----------
Net loss ............................................... $ (0.13) $ (2.74) $ (1.25)
=========== =========== ===========

Weighted average number of shares outstanding
used in computing per share amounts .................... 3,206,179 3,200,140 3,194,021
=========== =========== ===========
</TABLE>


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.


-F3-
36
OAKHURST COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ADDITIONAL RETAINED
COMMON PAID-IN EARNINGS TREASURY
STOCK CAPITAL (DEFICIT) STOCK TOTALS
-------- ----------- --------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE AT FEBRUARY 28, 1995 .... $ 32 $ 46,480 $(31,676) $ (1) $14,835
Net loss ........................ (3,978) (3,978)
Employee stock award ............ * 19 19
Other ........................... 23 23
-------- -------- -------- ------ --------
BALANCE AT FEBRUARY 29, 1996 .... 32 46,522 (35,654) (1) 10,899
Net loss ........................ (8,761) (8,761)
Employee stock award ............ * 7 7
-------- -------- -------- ------ --------
BALANCE AT FEBRUARY 28, 1997 .... 32 46,529 (44,415) (1) 2,145
Net loss ........................ (408) (408)
Employee stock award ............ * 6 6
-------- -------- -------- ------ --------
BALANCE AT FEBRUARY 28, 1998 .... $ 32 $ 46,535 $(44,823) $ (1) $ 1,743
======== ======== ======== ====== ========
</TABLE>


* Rounds to less than $1



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.


-F4-
37
OAKHURST COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 29,
1998 1997 1996
------------- ----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Loss from continuing operations ......................................... $ (408) $(8,761) $(4,043)
Adjustments to reconcile loss from continuing
operations to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization ........................................ 661 1,207 873
Deferred tax expense ................................................. 1,000 3,086 2,000
Gain on sale of real estate .......................................... (1,761) -- --
Loss on assets held for sale ......................................... -- 3,297 --
Loss on retirement of assets ......................................... 18 36 37
Employee stock award ................................................. 6 7 19
Other ................................................................ -- -- 23
Other changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable .................................................. (144) (255) 1,667
Inventories .......................................................... (480) 1,102 2,320
Accounts payable ..................................................... 286 760 (2,304)
Other ................................................................ 216 330 (467)
------- ------- -------
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of:
Continuing operations ................................................... (606) 809 125
Discontinued operations ................................................. (294) (255) (282)
------- ------- -------
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: ........................ (900) 554 (157)
------- ------- -------

Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property and equipment ..................................... (347) (177) (430)
Proceeds from the sale of real estate ................................... 2,656 -- --
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired ....................... -- (79) --
Loss on assets held for sale ............................................ -- (196) --
Net change in the excess of cost over net assets acquired ............... -- -- (284)
Other ................................................................... 52 (25) --
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities ......................... 2,361 (477) (714)
------- ------- -------

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net borrowings under revolving credit agreement ......................... 162 693 2,225
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt ................................ -- 1,500 --
Repayment of notes payable .............................................. (105) -- (548)
Principal payments on long-term obligations ............................. (1,475) (2,276) (802)
Deferred loan costs ..................................................... (35) (273) --

------- ------- -------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities ......................... (1,453) (356) 875
------- ------- -------

Net increase (decrease) in cash ............................................. 8 (279) 4
Cash at beginning of year ................................................... 39 318 314
------- ------- -------
Cash at end of year ......................................................... $ 47 $ 39 $ 318
======= ======= =======

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

Cash paid during the year for operating activities:
Interest .............................................................. $ 667 791 $ 903
======= ======= =======
Income taxes, net of refunds received ................................. $ 16 (3) $ 9
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

Fiscal year ending February 28, 1997:
A note payable of $105, and non-compete agreement with a discounted
value of $274 were issued in connection with the acquisition of a
subsidiary (see Note 13). In addition, there were charges relating to
the disposal of two subsidiaries (see Note 2).

Fiscal year ending February 29, 1996:
Capital lease obligations of $76 were incurred in connection with
leases of new equipment.

A note and an earn-out payable totaling $825 were canceled in
connection with the settlement of an arbitration proceeding involving
the former owner of a subsidiary which was acquired in fiscal 1995,
and another earn-out payable was reduced by $400 as a result of the
earnings trends of another subsidiary also acquired in fiscal 1995.


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.


-F5-
38


OAKHURST COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. SUMMARY OF BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation:

Oakhurst Company, Inc. ("Oakhurst" or "the Company"), was formed as a
result of a merger transaction (the "merger") in fiscal 1992 between Steel City
Products, Inc. ("SCPI") and an Oakhurst subsidiary. The merger resulted in a
restructuring of SCPI such that it became a majority-owned subsidiary of
Oakhurst. In accordance with the merger, Oakhurst owns 10% of the outstanding
common stock of SCPI and all of SCPI's Series A Preferred Stock. The merger was
structured such that the aggregate fair market value of SCPI's common stock and
Series A Preferred Stock owned by Oakhurst would be approximately 90% of the
aggregate fair market value of the issued and outstanding common and voting
preferred stock of SCPI. Accordingly, Oakhurst controls approximately 90% of the
voting power of SCPI. The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect
this control and include the accounts of SCPI.

Oakhurst acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of H&H
Distributors d/b/a Harry Survis, ("H&H"), of Dowling's Fleet Service Co., Inc.
("Dowling's") and of Puma Products, Inc. ("Puma") in January 1994, August 1994
and October 1994, respectively. In March 1995, Oakhurst formed Oakhurst
Management Corporation ("OMC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary, to coordinate the
provision of certain corporate administrative, legal, and accounting services to
the Company and its subsidiaries. In March 1996, Dowling's acquired the
outstanding capital stock of G&O Sales Company ("G&O") (see Note 13). In May
1997 and June 1997, Oakhurst sold the capital stock of H&H and Puma,
respectively (see Note 2). The accompanying consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of these subsidiaries for the respective periods of
ownership, and all significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates:

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principals, which requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Business Activities:

The Company's operations at February 28, 1998 consisted of two
subsidiaries primarily engaged in the wholesale distribution trade to the
automotive aftermarket. SCPI is a wholesale distributor operating under the
trade name Steel City Products selling principally automotive accessories
primarily to discount retail chains, hardware, drug and supermarket retailers
and to automotive specialty stores, based mainly in the Northeastern United
States. In fiscal 1996, SCPI also began the wholesale distribution of non-food
pet supplies, primarily to supermarket retailers. Dowling's is a wholesale
distributor of automotive radiators and related parts serving mostly radiator
repair shops in the New York, Connecticut, New Jersey and greater Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania markets. For the years ended February 28, 1997 and February 28,
1996, the Company's operations also included H&H and Puma. H&H was involved in
the retail and wholesale distribution and installation of automotive
accessories, including stereos, alarms and cellular phones, in western
Pennsylvania. Puma was a wholesale distributor of high quality truck and van
conversion products to automotive and truck converters, restylers and
accessories retailers.


-F6-
39

Fiscal Year:

The Company's fiscal year ends on the last day of February.

Inventories:

The Company's inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.
Cost is determined by the last in, first out method (LIFO) for 59% of the
Company's inventories at February 28, 1998 and 1997, and by the first in, first
out (FIFO) method for the remaining inventories. Had all the Company's
inventories been valued using the FIFO method, they would have been
approximately $285,000 and $388,000 higher than reported at February 28, 1998
and 1997, respectively.

Property and Equipment:

Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line
method. Estimated useful lives used for computing depreciation and amortization
are: buildings, 15-40 years; building improvements, 5-20 years; leasehold
improvements, 3-10 years; and office furniture, equipment and vehicles, 3-10
years. Depreciation expense was approximately $278,000, $493,000 and $430,000 in
fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.

Excess of Costs Over Net Assets Acquired:

The excess of cost over net assets acquired is associated with the
acquisition of Oakhurst's subsidiaries and is amortized over periods ranging
from 15 to 40 years. The unamortized values at February 28, 1998 and 1997, are
net of accumulated amortization of approximately $795,000 and $601,000,
respectively. Oakhurst assesses whether its excess of costs over net assets
acquired and other long-lived assets are impaired at each balance sheet date
based upon an evaluation of undiscounted projected cash flow through the
remaining amortization period. If an impairment is determined, the amount of
such impairment is calculated based upon the estimated fair value of the asset.

Revenue Recognition:

Revenues are recognized at the time products are shipped.

Federal Income Taxes:

Oakhurst accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability
approach to accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are
recognized for the future tax consequences of events that have already been
recognized in the financial statements or tax returns. Net deferred tax assets
are recognized to the extent that management believes that realization of such
benefits is considered more likely than not. Changes in enacted tax rates or
laws may result in adjustments to the recorded deferred tax assets or
liabilities in the period that the tax law is enacted (see Note 6).

Stock-Based Compensation:

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic
value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations.



-F7-
40

Earnings Per Share:

During fiscal 1998, Oakhurst adopted statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share". This standard requires presentation of
basic and diluted earnings per share and restatement of all prior period
earnings per share presented. Basic earnings or loss per share is computed by
dividing net earnings or loss by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the year. The diluted earnings per share calculation assumes
the conversion of dilutive stock options into common shares. Loss per share
amounts do not include common stock equivalents since that would have an
antidilutive effect and reduce net loss per share. At February 28, 1998, there
were options to purchase 1,087,708 shares of common stock outstanding that were
not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the
options' exercise price was greater than the average market value of the common
shares.

2. SALE OF SUBSIDIARIES

Effective as of May 31, 1997, Oakhurst entered into an agreement to
sell all of the capital stock of Puma, and in July 1997, Oakhurst entered into
an agreement to sell all of the capital stock of H&H. Because there was no net
realizable value relative to such subsidiaries, the results for fiscal 1997
included a charge related to the disposal of such subsidiaries representing the
net effect of the write-off of the net assets of the subsidiaries and the
related excess of costs over net assets acquired. The results for fiscal 1998
include other income from these two subsidiaries, including recoveries on
certain insurance claims related to H&H.

Effective as of May 31, 1997, the former owner of Puma who is a
director of Oakhurst, acquired the capital stock of Puma in exchange for his
repayment of the revolving debt attributable to Puma of approximately $400,000,
the cancellation of a note payable and an earn-out to him aggregating $1.2
million, the forgiveness of Oakhurst's intercompany debts to Puma, and the
payment by Oakhurst of $50,000. The agreement contains mutual releases and
provides for a payment to Oakhurst in the event of a re-sale of Puma's stock
within one year, equal to 12.5% of the excess of any such sales price (including
debt assumed by an acquirer) over $1 million. The buyer of Puma also acquired
all of the assets relating to SCPI's Wing-Tech division for the net book value
of approximately $170,000. As a result of the sale of Puma, Oakhurst was
relieved of contingent liabilities in respect of Puma's lease and employment
agreement obligations aggregating approximately $500,000.

Effective as of July 14, 1997, a Vice-President of H&H acquired the
capital stock of H&H in exchange for H&H's forgiveness of Oakhurst's
intercompany debt to H&H and the retention by Oakhurst of certain insurance
claims related to H&H. As a result of the sale of H&H, Oakhurst was relieved of
contingent liabilities in respect of H&H's lease and employment obligations
aggregating approximately $900,000.

3. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment are summarized as follows (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 28,
1998 1997
------------ -------------
<S> <C> <C>
Land ........................................... $ -- $ 170
Buildings ...................................... -- 830
Leasehold and building improvements ............ 451 520
Office furniture, equipment and vehicles ....... 1,331 1,319
------- -------
1,782 2,839
Less accumulated depreciation .................. (1,098) (1,311)
------- -------
$ 684 $ 1,528
======= =======
</TABLE>

In December 1997, SCPI sold warehouse in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to an
unrelated third party for a gross purchase price of approximately $2.8 million
in cash. Accordingly, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998 SCPI recorded a
pre-tax gain of approximately $1.8 million in connection with the sale. After
repayment of the term loan secured by the property, the net proceeds of
approximately $1.6 million were used to reduce revolving debt, to cover the
expenses of moving SCPI's operations to newer, leased premises and to make
certain improvements to such premises.





-F8-
41

4. LINE OF CREDIT AND LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS

Long-term obligations, including the present value of the Creditor
Notes (see Note 7), consist of the following (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 28,
1998 1997
----------- ------------
<S> <C> <C>
Creditor Notes, due annually through July 1998 ..................... $ 522 $ 809
Revolving Credit Agreement due in April 1999 ....................... 4,043 3,881
Dowling's Notes, due quarterly through March 2001 .................. 286 374
G&O non-compete payments, due monthly through March 1999 ........... 114 204
Capital lease obligations for computer and warehouse equipment,
due monthly through August 2001 .............................. 27 50
G&O acquisition note, paid in March 1997 ........................... -- 105
Fixed Asset Loan, repaid in December 1997 .......................... -- 1,268
Other .............................................................. 60 66
------- -------
5,052 6,757
Less current portion ............................................... (734) (1,041)
------- -------
$ 4,318 $ 5,716
======= =======
</TABLE>

On March 28, 1996, Oakhurst and its subsidiaries entered into a two
year revolving credit agreement with an institutional lender that provided for a
total facility for Oakhurst and its subsidiaries of $9.5 million, comprised of a
SCPI term loan of $1.5 million (the "Fixed Asset Loan"), secured by a mortgage
on SCPI's real estate, and a maximum revolving credit facility of $8 million
(the "Revolver") (collectively, the "Credit Facility").

Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at the higher of the
Citibank N.A. base rate plus 1.5%, or $5,000 per month, and borrowings under the
Revolver are subject to a borrowing base that is calculated according to defined
levels of Oakhurst's subsidiaries' accounts receivable and inventories. The
Credit Facility had an initial term of two years, and contains restrictive
financial covenants, including among other things, the maintenance of defined
subsidiary and consolidated tangible net worth levels and consolidated current
ratio, and limitations on annual cash dividends. The Credit Facility is secured
by the accounts receivable, inventories, and fixed assets of Oakhurst and its
subsidiaries, contains certain Revolver prepayment penalties, and provides for
the payment of loan management fees, unused Revolver facility fees and
examination fees.

In June 1997, Oakhurst and its subsidiaries entered into an agreement
with the lender to amend the Credit Facility to reflect the dispositions of H&H
and Puma. The agreement principally reduced the maximum amount available under
the Revolver to $7 million, subject to a borrowing base, and amended certain
financial covenants, including the elimination of the consolidated tangible net
worth covenant. In September 1997, Oakhurst and its subsidiaries reached an
agreement with the lender to extend the Revolver beyond its initial two year
term to April 1999, and paid a fee of $35,000 in connection with the renewal.
The Credit Agreement provides for subsequent automatic renewal terms of one year
each upon payment of a renewal fee of 0.5% of the entire line, unless earlier
terminated as provided for in the Agreement. At February 28, 1998, the borrowing
base under the Revolver was approximately $4.7 million. During fiscal 1998, the
borrowing base ranged from $4.2 million to $6 million, and averaged
approximately $5.2 million.

In December 1997, the Fixed Asset Loan was repaid in full, from the
proceeds of the sale of SCPI's warehouse.

The Dowling's Notes that were issued in connection with the fiscal 1995
acquisition of Dowling's bear interest at 6% and provide for repayment in
quarterly installments of $22,000 each, together with accrued interest thereon,
beginning in June 1996.



-F9-
42

The G&O Acquisition Note bore interest at 7% and was paid in full in
March 1997, together with accrued interest thereon. The G&O Non-Compete
Agreement provides for 36 monthly payments of $8,750 beginning in March 1996.
The G&O Non-Compete Agreement has been discounted using an imputed interest rate
of 9.75% (see Note 13).

Long-term obligations mature during each fiscal year as follows (in
thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL
------
<S> <C>
1999.......................... $ 734
2000.......................... 4,165
2001.......................... 101
2002.......................... 33
2003.......................... 12
Thereafter.......................... 7
------
$5,052
======
</TABLE>


5. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Financial instruments at February 28, 1998 and 1997 consist of the
following (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FEBRUARY 28, 1998 FEBRUARY 28, 1997
--------------------- ---------------------
CARRYING FAIR CARRYING FAIR
VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE
--------- -------- --------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Creditor Notes................ $ 522 $ 580 $ 809 $ 812
Revolving Credit Agreement
and Fixed Asset Loan ...... $ 4,043 $ 4,043 $ 5,149 $5,149
</TABLE>


The fair values of the instruments were based upon the rate available
to the Company for instruments of the same maturities. The Creditor Notes, which
are non-interest bearing, were discounted using a market rate of 11.75% to
determine current fair value.


6. INCOME TAXES AND DEFERRED TAX ASSET

At February 28, 1998, Oakhurst has, for tax reporting purposes,
estimated net operating tax loss carry-forwards of approximately $154 million
which expire in the years 2001 through 2012. Under SFAS No. 109, Oakhurst
records as an asset the future benefit of its net operating tax loss
carry-forwards and other tax benefits.

Fluctuations in market conditions and trends and other changes in the
Company's earnings base, such as subsidiary acquisitions and disposals, warrant
periodic management reviews of the recorded tax asset to determine if an
increase or decrease in the recorded valuation allowance is necessary to reduce
the tax asset to an amount that management believes will more likely than not be
realized. During the year ended February 29, 1996, SCPI experienced significant
changes in its customer base. As a result, management undertook an extensive
review of SCPI's operations to determine the impact of such changes on SCPI's
future levels of revenues and profits. In addition, the Company's other
operating subsidiaries were evaluated considering the then current trends and
historical operations. This review led to an increase of approximately $2.5
million in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, with a corresponding
charge to deferred tax expense.

Subsequently, the Board of Directors of Oakhurst made the decision to
dispose of Puma and H&H, which led to a further increase of approximately $4.9
million in the valuation allowance of the deferred tax asset, with a
corresponding charge to deferred tax expense for the year ended February 28,
1997. In fiscal


-F10-
43

1998, the valuation allowance was increased to the full value of the deferred
tax asset, resulting in an additional charge to deferred tax expense of $701,000
for the year ended February 28, 1998. If future profit levels exceed current
expectations, and economic or business changes warrant upward revisions in the
estimate of the realizable value of net operating tax loss carry-forwards, the
consequent reduction in the valuation allowance would result in a corresponding
deferred tax benefit in future results of operations to the extent of the
aggregate charges of approximately $8 million to deferred tax expense for fiscal
1998, fiscal 1997 and fiscal 1996, and any benefit in excess of such charge
would be reflected as an addition to paid-in capital. The accounting treatment
to increase paid-in capital results from SCPI's quasi-reorganization accounting
in 1990.

The deferred tax effects of temporary differences are not significant,
and current income taxes payable represent state income taxes.

Income tax expense consists of the following (in thousands):


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 29,
1998 1997 1996
------------ ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current tax expense (benefit) ............... $ 315 $ 12 $ (115)
Current tax benefit from utilization of
net operating tax loss carryforwards ...... (299) -- --
------- ------- -------
16 12 (115)
Increase in valuation allowance
of the deferred tax asset ................. 701 4,854 2,482
Deferred tax expense (benefit) .............. 299 (1,768) (482)
------- ------- -------
Income tax expense .......................... $ 1,016 $ 3,098 $ 1,885
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>

During the fiscal year ended February 29, 1996, SCPI settled a dispute
over a tax refund claimed from the state of Kentucky by SCPI's predecessor, and
accordingly, recorded a refund of approximately $142,000, including
approximately $35,000 in interest.

The income tax provision differs from the amount using the statutory
federal income tax rate of 34% applied to income or loss from continuing
operations for the following reasons (in thousands):


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL FISCAL FISCAL
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 28, FEBRUARY 29,
1998 1997 1996
------------- ------------ ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Tax expense (benefit) at the U.S.
federal statutory rate ................. $ 207 $(1,925) $ (734)
State income tax expense (benefit),
net of refunds and federal benefit ..... 11 7 (75)
Increase in deferred tax asset
valuation allowance .................... 701 4,854 2,482
Non-deductible costs ..................... 97 162 212
------- ------- -------
Income tax expense ................... $ 1,016 $ 3,098 $ 1,885
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>


-F11-
44


The availability of the net operating tax loss carry-forwards may be
adversely affected by future ownership changes of SCPI or Oakhurst; at this
time, such changes cannot be predicted. Oakhurst's estimated net operating tax
loss carry-forwards at February 28, 1998 expire as follows (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal
- ------
<S> <C>
2002 .......................... $ 12,000
2003 .......................... 52,000
2004 .......................... 22,000
2005 .......................... 49,000
2006 .......................... 13,000
2011........................... 1,000
2012........................... 2,000
2013 .......................... 3,000
--------
$154,000
========
</TABLE>


7. DISCONTINUED RETAIL OPERATIONS

SCPI disposed of its former Retail Division to an unrelated company,
Retail Acquisition Corp. ("RAC") in September 1990 when RAC acquired
substantially all the assets of the former division and assumed substantially
all of its liabilities. SCPI remained contingently liable for certain of these
liabilities. Subsequently, RAC was forced into bankruptcy, and in fiscal 1993,
SCPI participated in a global settlement pursuant to which SCPI issued $2.5
million of non-interest bearing notes (the "Creditor Notes") solely for the
benefit of contingent creditors. In return, SCPI and Oakhurst were relieved of
any further obligations to contingent creditors, except for payment on the
Creditor Notes.

The Creditor Notes, which are non-interest bearing, are payable in
equal annual installments through July 1998. The Creditor Notes have been
discounted using an imputed interest rate of 7.5%. Imputed interest expense of
approximately $34,000, $56,000 and $76,000 is included in results of continuing
operations for fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.

The accompanying statements of operations and cash flows reflect any
income or loss associated with the disposal of the former Retail Division as
discontinued operations.


8. STOCK OPTIONS

In fiscal 1995, the Board of Directors and shareholders approved two
stock option plans, the 1994 Omnibus Stock Plan (the "Omnibus Plan") and the
1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the "Director Plan"). Under both
plans, the exercise price of the option granted may not be less than the fair
market value of the common stock on the date of the grant, and the term of the
grant may not exceed ten years.

The Omnibus Plan initially provided for the issuance of a maximum of
350,000 shares of Oakhurst's common stock pursuant to the grant of incentive
stock options to employees of Oakhurst and its subsidiaries, and the grant of
non-qualified stock options, stock or restricted stock to employees,
consultants, directors and officers of Oakhurst and its subsidiaries. In fiscal
1997, the plan was increased by 150,000 shares, and in fiscal 1998, the Board of
Directors adopted an amendment to the plan whereby the maximum amount of shares
issuable under the Omnibus Plan was increased by 450,000 shares. The options
generally vest over a four year period and expire ten years from the date of the
grant. None of these options have been exercised.

The Director Plan (a "formula plan") provides for the issuance of up to
100,000 shares of common stock pursuant to options granted to directors who are
not employees of the Company. The plan provides that



-F12-
45

on May 1 of each year, each non-employee director holding office on such date
receives a fully-exercisable, fully vested, ten year option to purchase 3,000
shares at the market value on such date. Each director's options expire upon
such director's resignation. None of these options have been exercised.

In fiscal 1992, the Board of Directors granted ten year options to
purchase 194,388 shares of Oakhurst's common stock to key employees and to
certain members of the Board of Directors. The exercise price of the
options, which was equal to the market value of the stock at the date of the
grant, was $2.75 and in fiscal 1996, the price of 49,984 of such options was
reduced to $2.00 per share. These options are fully vested, will remain
exercisable through 2001, and each employee's options expire upon such
employee's resignation.

As described in Note 1, the Company accounts for its stock-based
compensation using the intrinsic value method. There would have been no effect
on the Company's net earnings and earnings per share for fiscal 1998, 1997 and
1996 had the Company used the fair value method to determine compensation costs
instead of the intrinsic value method.

The following tables summarize the activity under the three plans:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Omnibus Plan (a) Director's Plan (b) Fiscal 1992 Grant
---------------------- -------------------- ----------------------
Price Price Price
Shares Range Shares Range Shares Range
--------- ---------- ------ ---------- -------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at 2/95: 313,084 $2.00-3.88 24,000 $2.00-2.75 179,395 $2.00-2.75
Granted 129,500 $1.25-2.00 24,000 $ 3.38 -- --
Expired -- -- (6,000) $2.75-3.38 -- --
-------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ----------
Outstanding at 2/96: 442,584 $1.25-3.88 42,000 $2.75-3.38 179,395 $2.00-2.75
Granted 49,900 $1.16-1.25 15,000 $ 1.22 -- --
Expired (21,850) $1.25-3.88 (9.000) $1.22-3.38 (29,992) $ 2.75
-------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ----------
Outstanding at 2/97: 470,634 $1.16-3.88 48,000 $1.22-3.38 149,400 $2.00-2.75
Granted 466,600 $0.88-1.00 12,000 $ 1.00 -- --
Expired (35,100) $1.16-3.88 (3,000) $ 2.75 (20,827) $ 2.00
-------- ---------- ------- ---------- ------- ----------
Outstanding at 2/98: 902,134 $0.88-3.88 57,000 $1.00-3.38 128,573 $2.00-2.75
======== ========== ======= ========== ======= ==========
</TABLE>

(a) In fiscal 1996, 105,000 options outstanding were repriced to $2.00. Of
the options granted in fiscal 1997, 100,000 vested over a one year
period. Of the options granted in fiscal 1997, 49,500 were immediately
exercisable. Of the options granted in fiscal 1998, 50,000 vest in May
1998 and 305,000 vest upon the earlier of the occurrence of certain
defined achievements, a change of control of the Company, or the ninth
anniversary of the grant date.

(b) In fiscal 1996, 49,984 options outstanding were repriced to $2.00 from
$2.75.


The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding and exercisable at February 28, 1998:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options outstanding Options exercisable
---------------------------------- -----------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted
average average average
Range of remaining exercise exercise
exercise price Number contractual price Number price
per share of shares life(years) per share of shares per share
- ----------------- --------- ----------- --------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$0.88 - $3.88 902,134 8.33 $1.50 429,309 $2.09
$1.00 - $3.38 57,000 7.49 $2.22 57,000 $2.22
$2.00 - $2.75 128,573 3.50 $2.58 128,573 $2.58
--------- -------
1,087,707 614,882
========= =======
</TABLE>

At February 28, 1997, options were exercisable for 600,917 shares at a
weighted average exercise price of $2.25 per share. The corresponding amounts at
February 29, 1996, were 476,351 and $2.57 per share, respectively.



-F13-
46

9. EMPLOYEE PENSION PLAN

Oakhurst and its subsidiaries maintain a defined contribution
profit-sharing retirement plan ("the Plan") covering substantially all persons
employed by the Company and its subsidiaries, whereby employees may contribute a
percentage of compensation, limited to maximum allowed amounts under the
Internal Revenue Code. The Plan provides for discretionary employer
contributions, the level of which, if any, may vary by subsidiary and is
determined annually by each company's Board of Directors. Total plan related
expense was approximately $60,000, $53,000 and $29,000 in fiscal 1998, fiscal
1997 and fiscal 1996, respectively.


10. LEASES

The Company leases its subsidiaries' warehouses under operating leases
which expire over the next five years. Generally, the leases are net leases that
require payment by the Company of executory expenses such as real estate taxes,
insurance, maintenance and other operating costs. The leases generally provide
for renewal options. Certain of these leases were with related parties (see Note
15).

Minimum annual rentals for all operating leases having initial
non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal
------
<S> <C>
1999........................................ $ 627
2000........................................ 366
2001........................................ 247
2002........................................ 247
2003........................................ 206
-------
Total future minimum rental payments $1,693
======
</TABLE>

Total rent expense for all operating leases amounted to approximately
$402,000, $703,000 and $600,000 for fiscal 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.


11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

SCPI has employment agreements with two senior executives that provide
termination rights in the event of a change in control of SCPI, as defined. The
rights include payments ranging from six to twenty-four months of the
executives' base salaries, along with continuation of benefits and certain other
payments to each executive. Each agreement also provides for substantially the
same provisions in the event that the executive's employment were to be
terminated by SCPI without cause. The agreements were extended in August 1996 on
a year to year basis, and will continue under the same terms unless a notice of
non-renewal is given by either party 90 days prior to the anniversary date of
such renewal, or unless replaced by a new agreement.

In fiscal 1996, Oakhurst entered into employment agreements with
certain senior executives of Oakhurst and Dowling's that provide for certain
termination rights in the event that the executive's employment were to be
terminated by Oakhurst without cause. The employment agreements expire between
May 1998 and February 2001.

Management is unaware of any other significant contingencies.


-F14-
47

12. MAJOR CUSTOMERS

Sales to each of those major customers representing individually more
than 10% of Oakhurst's consolidated sales were as follows (in thousands):


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended
February 28, 1998 February 28, 1997 February 29, 1996
------------------ ------------------- -----------------
% of % of % of
Sales Total Sales Sales Total Sales Sales Total Sales
----- ----------- ----- ----------- ----- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Customer "A" -- -- -- -- $4,641 10%
Customer "B" -- -- -- -- $3,975 8%
</TABLE>


During the third quarter of fiscal 1996, customer A informed SCPI that
it had decided to change its source of supply, and sales to this customer ended
in January 1996.

In fiscal 1996, one of SCPI's then-largest customers (customer B) filed
for protection under the United States Bankruptcy Code and announced that it
would close all its stores. The fiscal 1996 provision for doubtful accounts
contains a write-off of approximately $150,000 relating to this customer.


13. ACQUISITION

On March 28, 1996, Dowling's acquired all of the outstanding capital
stock of G&O, a radiator distributor based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The
purchase price of approximately $210,000 consisted of $105,000 in cash, with the
balance in the form of a note payable to the seller. The note carried interest
at 7%, and was paid in full on the first anniversary of the acquisition date,
together with interest thereon. The seller continues with G&O under a four year
employment agreement.

In connection with the acquisition, Dowling's entered into a
non-competition agreement with the seller that provides for aggregate payments
of $315,000 over a three-year period that began in March 1996, and for payments
of 7.5% of the defined profits of G&O for the first four years of ownership. The
value of the non-competition agreement has been discounted using an imputed
interest rate of 9.75%, and the related asset is being amortized over the life
of the agreement, which is ten years.

The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. In connection with the acquisition, assets were acquired and
liabilities were assumed as follows (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Fair value of assets acquired.................. $279
Liabilities assumed............................ 67
----
Net assets acquired......................... $212
====
</TABLE>


14. CORPORATE REORGANIZATION

Under the merger (see Note 1), SCPI is required for a period of five
years following the merger to issue to Oakhurst (or cancel) such number of
shares of Series A Preferred Stock and/or common stock as shall be necessary, in
accordance with periodic determinations, to maintain Oakhurst's aggregate stock
ownership of SCPI at 90%. Revaluations of SCPI as of the end of fiscal 1997,
1996 and 1995 have not yet been completed. Management expects that the
revaluations as of the end of fiscal 1997 and 1996, when complete, will result
in a decrease in the valuation of SCPI because of changes in the business
climate and SCPI's customer base that occurred primarily during fiscal 1996.
Accordingly, Series A Preferred shares outstanding may be canceled once such
valuations are complete.

-F15-
48
During fiscal 1993, the cumulative dividends on SCPI's Series A
Preferred Stock exceeded SCPI's net income for that year, thus creating a loss
attributable to SCPI's common stockholders in excess of Oakhurst's minority
interest and, accordingly, Oakhurst reduced to zero the minority interest
liability related to SCPI. At such time as SCPI's cumulative net income
attributable to common stockholders from the effective date of the merger
exceeds the cumulative Series A Preferred Stock dividends in arrears, Oakhurst
will again reflect the appropriate minority interest liability.


15. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In fiscal 1994, H&H entered into a seven-year lease with Harold
Garfinkel, the President and former owner of H&H, for the principal property
from which it conducted its business. The purchaser of H&H assumed all future
obligations under the lease effective as of July 1998. The lease required annual
lease payments of $144,000. H&H paid Mr. Garfinkel $48,000 in fiscal 1998, and
$144,000 in each of fiscal 1997 and 1996 under this lease.

In fiscal 1995, Puma entered into a six-year lease with Anthony Puma,
the former Chairman of Puma, currently a director of Oakhurst, for the facility
from which it conducted its business. The purchaser of Puma assumed all future
obligations under the lease effective as of May 1998. The lease required minimum
annual lease payments of approximately $80,000. Puma paid Mr. Puma approximately
$20,000 in fiscal 1998, and $80,000 in each of fiscal 1997 and 1996 under this
lease.

In fiscal 1998, Oakhurst sold Puma to Anthony Puma, a director of
Oakhurst (see Note 2).


16. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) (Dollar amounts in thousands,
except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL 1998 FIRST ECOND THIRD FOURTH
- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales ................................... $ 8,291 $ 9,336 $ 7,880 $ 6,800
Gross profit ............................ 1,492 1,938 1,431 1,327
Net (loss) income ....................... (315) 97 (330) 140

Basic and diluted per share amounts:
Net (loss) income .................... $ (.10) $ .03 $ (.10) $ .04
Average number of shares outstanding .... 3,203,611 3,207,053 3,207,053 3,211,532
</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FISCAL 1997 FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
- ----------- ---------- ----------- ----------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Sales ................................... $ 10,892 $ 11,454 $ 10,247 $ 9,335
Gross profit ............................ 2,412 2,577 2,221 2,259
Net loss ................................ (471) (432) (587) (7,271)

Basic and diluted per share amounts:
Net loss .............................. $ (.15) $ (.13) $ (.18) $ (2.27)
Average number of shares outstanding .... 3,197,183 3,201,144 3,201,144 3,201,144

</TABLE>


SCPI sold its real estate in December 1997, and accordingly, recorded a
pre-tax gain of approximately $1.8 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998
in connection with the sale. The results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998
also include a deferred tax charge of approximately $1 million, of which
$701,000 related to an increase in the valuation allowance of the deferred tax
asset (see Note 6).

-F16-
49

The net loss in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997 was primarily caused
by two factors. As of the end of fiscal 1998, Oakhurst's Board of Directors had
made the decision to dispose of H&H and Puma, and because there was no net
realizable value relative to such subsidiaries, the results for fiscal 1997
include a charge of approximately $3.5 related to the disposal of such
subsidiaries, principally representing the net effect of the write- off of the
net assets of the subsidiaries and the related excess of costs over net assets
acquired attributable to these subsidiaries. In addition, the results for the
fourth quarter of fiscal 1997 include a net deferred income tax charge of
approximately $3.1 million relating to an increase in the valuation allowance of
the deferred tax asset.



-F17-
50
SCHEDULE II
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

OAKHURST COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)


- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE AT CHARGES TO CHARGES TO BALANCE
BEGINNING COSTS OTHER ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS AT END
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD AND EXPENSES -DESCRIBE - DESCRIBE OF PERIOD
===================================================================================================================================
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Allowance for doubtful accounts deducted from trade accounts receivable:

Years ended:
February 28, 1998................. $ 555 $ 165 $ -- $ 259 (A) $ 461
=========== ========== ============ ========== ==============
February 28, 1997................. $ 558 $ 102 $ -- $ 105 (A) $ 555
=========== ========== ============ ========== ==============
February 29, 1996................. $ 282 $ 610 $ -- $ 334 (A) $ 558
=========== ========== ============ ========== ==============


</TABLE>



(A) Amounts were deemed uncollectible.





-F18-
51
EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No. Description
- ---------- -----------
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 20, 1991 (filed as
Appendix A to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus dated April 16, 1991
of the Company and Steel City Products, Inc.).

3.1 Restated and Amended Certificate of Incorporation (filed as
Exhibit 3 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal quarter ended August 31, 1996).

3.2 By-laws - as amended through January 13, 1998 - filed herewith.

4.1 Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of May 20, 1991 (see
Exhibit 2, above).

4.2 Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock dated as of February 10, 1998 - filed herewith.

*10.1 Form of Option Agreement dated August 29, 1991 with directors
and executive officers (filed as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's
Annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29,
1992).

10.2 Agreement dated June 11, 1991 with Prudential-Bache Special
Situations Fund (filed as Exhibit 10(q) to the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Steel City Products, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
March 3, 1990).

10.3 Purchase and Sale Agreement relating to the acquisition of
Dowling's Fleet Service Company, Inc. by Oakhurst Capital, Inc.,
also containing employment agreements with Robert Keane and
Joseph Quattrochi (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 27,
1994).

10.4 Lease agreements by and between James Dowling and Dowling's Fleet
Service Company, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28,
1995).

*10.5 The 1994 Omnibus Stock Plan with form of option agreement (filed
as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended February 28, 1995).

*10.6 The 1994 Non-Employee director Stock Option Plan with form of
option agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1995).

10.7 Loan and Security Agreement; Schedule to Loan and Security
Agreement; Secured Promissory Note with FINOVA Capital
Corporation all dated March 28, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended February 29, 1996).
52

10.8 Open-End Mortgage between Steel City Products, Inc. and FINOVA
Capital Corporation dated March 28, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.18
to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended February 29, 1996).

10.9 Consulting Agreement with Bryanston Management, Ltd, dated as of
December 19, 1995 (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 29, 1996).

*10.10 Employment Agreement and Form of Promissory Note between
Dowling's Fleet Service, Co., Inc. and Joseph B. Quattrochi dated
as of March 1, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.22 to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28,
1997).

*10.11 Employment Agreement and Form of Promissory Note between
Dowling's Fleet Service, Co., Inc. and Robert M. Keane dated as
of March 1, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.23 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1997).

*10.12 Employment Agreement between Laurence D. Finman and Oakhurst
Management Co., dated as of March 1, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.24
to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended February 28, 1997).

10.13 Non-Competition Agreement between G&O Sales Company and Arthur
Gruber dated as of March 12, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.25 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 28, 1997).

10.14 Amendment to Consulting Agreement and Amended Non-Qualified Stock
Option Agreement between Mark Auerbach and Oakhurst Company, Inc.
dated as of October 1, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
February 28, 1997).

10.15 Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement between Anthony N. Puma, Puma
Products, Inc. and Oakhurst Company, Inc., dated as of June 10,
1997 (filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 28, 1997).

10.16 Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement between James Stein, H&H
Distributors, Inc. and Oakhurst Company, Inc., dated as of July
14, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the first quarter ended May 31, 1997).

10.17 Agreement of Sale and Purchase by and between Steel City
Products, Inc. and Bearing Service Company of Pennsylvania dated
as of August 18, 1997 (filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter ended August
31, 1997).

10.18 Second and Third Amendments to the Loan and Security Agreement
between Oakhurst and its subsidiaries and FINOVA Capital
Corporation, dated effective June 1, 1997 and October 31, 1997,
respectively - filed herewith.

10.19 Lease agreement between Regional Industrial Development
Corporation and Steel City Products, Inc. dated as of - filed
herewith.
53

11 Statement of re-computation of per-share earnings - filed
herewith.

21 Subsidiaries at February 28, 1998:

Steel City Products, Inc. - Delaware
Dowling's Fleet Service Company, Inc. - New York
Oakhurst Management Corporation - Texas

23 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP - filed herewith.

27 Financial Data Schedule (EDGAR transmission only) - filed
herewith.

- ----------
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.