SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
Yes No
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Registrants have elected to follow:
Item 17 Item 18
Back to Contents
EXPLANATORY NOTE
The 2003 Annual report Appendix. For purposes of this annual report on Form 20-F the separate consolidated financial statements of the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Group, prepared on the basis of the legal ownership of the various operations within each part of the Group, have been presented in the 2003 Annual report Appendix. However, the DLC merger of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited has the effect of placing the shareholders of each company in substantially the same position as if they held shares in a single economic enterprise and therefore the directors consider that the combined financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group provide shareholders with the most meaningful representation of the state of affairs and of the profit and cash flows.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 2
RIO TINTO
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and AdvisersNot applicable.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected TimetableNot applicable.
Item 3. Key Information
Selected consolidated financial dataThe following selected consolidated financial data has been derived from the consolidated financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group presented elsewhere herein, restated where appropriate to accord with the current accounting policies and presentations. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with, and qualified in their entirety by reference to, the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F. The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with UK GAAP which differs in certain respects from US GAAP. Details of the principal differences between UK GAAP and US GAAP are set out on pages 137 to 147 of the 2003 Annual report and in note 42 on pages A-59 to A-74 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix.
Diluted earnings per share figures are 0.2 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures shown for 2003 and 2001, and approximately 0.1 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures for 2002 and other years.
Diluted earnings per share figures are 0.2 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures for 2003 and, approximately 0.1 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures for other years.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 3
Diluted earnings per share figures are approximately 0.1 US cents lower than the basic earnings per share figures for all years.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 4
Risk factorsRisk factors have been discussed on page 7 of the 2003 Annual report.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 5
Cautionary statement about forward looking statementsTo come within the 'Safe Harbor' provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Rio Tinto is providing the following cautionary statement: This document contains certain forward looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of the Rio Tinto Group. The words “intend”, “aim”, “project”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “plan”, “believes”, “expects”, “may”, “should”, “will”, or similar expressions, commonly identify such forward looking statements. Examples of forward looking statements in this annual report on Form 20-F include those regarding estimated reserves, anticipated production or construction commencement dates, costs, outputs and productive lives of assets or similar factors. Forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors set forth in this document that are beyond the Group’s control. For example, future reserves will be based in part on market prices that may vary significantly from current levels. These may materially affect the timing and feasibility of particular developments. Other factors include the ability to produce and transport products profitably, the impact of foreign currency exchange rates on market prices and operating costs, and activities by governmental authorities, such as changes in taxation or regulation, and political uncertainty. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, actual results could be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by these forward looking statements. The Group does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events. The Group cannot guarantee that its forward looking statements will not differ materially from actual results.
Item 4. Information on the CompanyInformation on the Rio Tinto Group has been set out on pages 9 to 21 and on pages 25 to 31 of the 2003 Annual report and in notes 26 and 27 on pages A-34 to A-38 in the 2003 Annual report Appendix. The disclosures in connection with ore reserves are supplemented with alternative estimates for purposes of US reporting on page 147 of the 2003 Annual report and which has been repeated on page A-75 in the 2003 Annual report Appendix. A description of Rio Tinto’s dual listed companies structure has been set out on pages 77 to 79 of the 2003 Annual report and its principal subsidiaries have been listed in note 31 on page 118 of the 2003 Annual report.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Individual listed company information: Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of Rio Tinto GroupIn December 1995 the shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited approved the terms of a dual listed companies (‘DLC’) merger that was designed to place the shareholders of both companies in substantially the same position as if they held shares in a single enterprise. UK GAAP recognises the DLC merger as a combination of economic interests and in order to present a true and fair view of the Rio Tinto Group the principles of merger accounting have been adopted in accordance with FRS 6. Accordingly, the Rio Tinto Group’s Operating and Financial Review and Prospects have been presented on a combined basis on pages 32 to 56 in the 2003 Annual report. Set out below is a separate discussion and analysis relating to each of the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Rio Tinto Group.
Rio Tinto plc part of Rio Tinto Group
2003 compared with 2002Rio Tinto plc's net sales revenue (referred to as consolidated turnover in the financial statements) was US$4,032 million (2002: US$3,929 million). The three per cent increase in 2003 is largely due to the commencement of sales at Diavik. Profit on ordinary activities before interest and tax was US$1,512 million. The corresponding figure for 2002 was US$602 million lower, but suffered from exceptional charges of US$755 million. Iron and Titanium profits were lower in 2003 as a result of the weak US dollar, soft market conditions and the write down of a customer receivable. The pretax profit impact of reduced volumes at Kennecott Utah Copper was partly offset by benefits from higher copper prices. A loss at Rössing reflected lower prices and adverse exchange rates. 2003 profits also suffered from increased pension finance costs, resulting from the decrease in fund asset values. However, profits benefited in 2003 from Diavik's first year of operation; and there was an increase in operating profit contributed by joint ventures following expansion of capacity at Escondida. In 2003, net interest payable decreased to US$138 million (2002: US$156 million), as a result of lower net debt and the reduced interest rates. Interest rates for the majority of Rio Tinto plc's borrowings are based on 3 month LIBOR, which averaged 1.2 per cent in 2003 and 1.8 per cent in 2002. The effective tax rate was 26.1 per cent in 2003. The reduction from the 2002 tax rate of 61.8 per cent is largely due to the effect of exceptional items. Excluding these, the tax rate in 2003, at 27.1 per cent is lower than the 30.7 per cent for 2002 as a result of lower tax payments in the US. The 2003 exceptional gain of US$47 million attracted no tax charge. In 2002 tax relief recognised on the exceptional losses of US$755 million was US$9 million. Net earnings of US$956 million compare with US$195 million in 2002. The increase of US$761 million includes the effect of exceptional charges of US$739 million, in 2002, in contrast with gains of US$47 million in 2003.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 6
2002 compared with 2001Rio Tinto plc's net sales revenue (referred to as consolidated turnover in the financial statements) was US$3,929 million in 2002, six per cent higher than in 2001. The increase primarily reflected higher volumes at Utah Copper and higher average prices at Kennecott Energy. Profit on ordinary activities before interest and tax was US$910 million compared with US$1,253 million in 2001. Exceptional asset write downs reflected in this number were US$639 million in 2002 against US$671 million in 2001. US$480 million of the write downs in 2002 and US$531 million of the write downs in 2001 related to Utah Copper. 2002 exceptional asset write downs also included US$89 million relating to Rio Tinto Limited's write down of the Iron Ore Company of Canada Inc. The remainder of the write downs in 2001 related to gold producing assets. In addition, in 2002, there was an exceptional charge of US$116 million relating to environmental remediation works at Utah Copper. None of these exceptional charges would qualify as extraordinary items under US GAAP. In addition to the above exceptional items, the reduction in profit before interest and tax reflected the absence of the US$54 million gain on disposal of Norzink in 2001, adverse exchange rates, inflation and adverse changes in other corporate items including pension costs. Interest rates for the majority of Rio Tinto plc's borrowings are based on 3 month LIBOR, which averaged 1.8 per cent in 2002 and 3.8 per cent in 2001. Net interest payable was US$69 million lower than in 2001 as the lower interest rate more than offset the effect of increased net debt in the year. The effective tax rate was 30.7 per cent (2001: 30.1 per cent) before exceptional charges and 61.8 per cent (2001: 38.5 per cent) after exceptional charges. The 2001 effective tax rate before exceptional charges benefited from the US$54 million non taxable gain on the sale of Norzink. Net earnings of US$195 million (2001: US$491 million) were reduced in both years by the exceptional charges referred to above. Adjusted net earnings at US$934 million (2001: US$1,042 million) exclude the exceptional charges and are lower as a result of the factors noted above. Total cash flow from operations was US$1,976 million compared with US$1,532 million in 2001. Reductions in working capital in the period largely reversed the increases in 2001. Dividends from associates increased, reflecting a US$146 million dividend paid by Rio Tinto Limited to Rio Tinto plc on the DLC Dividend Share. Capital expenditure and financial investment remained around the same level as in 2001. However, 2002 includes the purchase of US$304 million of US treasury bonds held as security for the deferred consideration on the North Jacobs Ranch reserves acquired during the period, which is payable over the next four years. A net US$87 million of funds were advanced to Rio Tinto Limited companies in 2002 which compares with an advance of US$399 million in 2001. The net cash inflow from acquisitions and disposals of US$104 million in 2002 included the remittance of US$115 million from Rio Tinto Limited in relation to the buyback of some of its shares from Rio Tinto plc in 2000. Dividends paid to shareholders were US$108 million higher than in 2001 as a result of the change in policy for weighting of interim and final dividends announced in 2001. Net debt increased from US$2,311 million at 31 December 2001 to US$2,625 million at 31 December 2002 primarily reflecting the cash outflow before management of liquid resources and financing of US$235 million. Shareholders' funds were US$5,899 million at the end of 2002 compared with US$5,902 million at the end of 2001. Retained losses of US$444 million were offset by positive exchange rate changes, primarily on the Australian dollar, and the impact of the dividend on the DLC Dividend Share.
Rio Tinto Limited part of Rio Tinto Group
2003 Compared with 2002Rio Tinto Limited's net sales revenue (referred to as consolidated turnover in the financial statements) was US$5,196 million in 2003 (2002: US$4,514 million). The 15 per cent increase in 2003 is largely due to increased volumes and prices at the Iron Ore operations and increased prices and smelter output at Comalco. The disposals of Kaltim Prima Coal and Alumbrera during the year resulted in a reduction in share of joint ventures' and associates' turnover. In 2003 profit on ordinary activities before interest and tax was US$1,391 million (2002: US$1,180 million after exceptional asset write downs of US$433 million). The weakening of the US dollar against the Australian dollar and Canadian dollar, in which most of the Group's costs are denominated, reduced profit. However, 2003 profits benefited from exceptional gains on the disposal of a subsidiary, a joint venture and an associate, of US$126 million: whereas, 2002 profits were reduced by exceptional losses.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 7
In 2003, net interest payable decreased to US$100 million (2002: US$124 million), due largely to lower interest rates. The effective tax rate in 2003 was 28.7 per cent, which compares with 40.9 per cent in 2002. However, excluding the effect of exceptional items, the tax rate was 31.7 per cent in both years. The 2003 exceptional gain of US$126 million attracted no tax charge. In 2002 tax relief recognised on the exceptional losses of US$433 million was US$42 million. Profits attributable to outside interests increased in 2003, primarily because 2002 was impacted by the exceptional asset write downs at IOC. Net earnings increased to US$884 million (2002: US$736 million) as a result of the factors above. Total cash flow from operations was similar to 2002 at US$2,053 million (2002: US$ 2,043 million). The increase in cash flow from operating activities was offset by a reduction in dividends received from the coal joint ventures in 2003. Capital expenditure and financial investment increased as a result of continued expansion at Hamersley; and construction of the Comalco Alumina Refinery. During 2003 Rio Tinto Limited remitted US$1,208 million to Rio Tinto plc in respect of shares that were repurchased in 2000. In addition, a subsidiary of Rio Tinto Limited, issued US$500 million of redeemable preference shares to a subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc. The factors mentioned above combined to reduce cash flow and increase the level of net debt in 2003.
2002 Compared with 2001Rio Tinto Limited's net sales revenue was US$4,514 million in 2002, 2 per cent higher than in 2001. The effect of higher volumes at Argyle and the commencement of West Angelas operations more than offset the absence of sales from the Forestry operations, which were disposed of in 2001. Profit on ordinary activities before interest and tax was US$1,180 million compared with US$1,745 million in 2001. This fall included the impact of US$433 million of exceptional asset write downs in 2002 compared with US$71 million of exceptional asset write downs in 2001. The 2002 exceptional asset write down related primarily to the Iron Ore Company of Canada Inc (IOC). The 2001 asset write down related to some of Rio Tinto Limited's gold producing assets. The exceptional asset write downs do not qualify as extraordinary items under US GAAP. The decrease in profit on ordinary activities before interest and tax also reflected the strengthening of the Australian dollar against the US dollar, which increased costs, and lower prices for iron ore and coal. The interest charge of US$124 million was US$66 million lower than in 2001. The effective tax rate was 31.7 per cent (2001: 33.7 per cent) before exceptional asset write downs and 40.9 per cent (2001: 34.0 per cent) after exceptional asset write downs. The effective rate before exceptional asset write downs in 2002 benefited from reductions in deferred tax provisions brought forward from prior years. There was a credit of US$126 million for amounts attributable to outside shareholders in 2002 compared to a charge in 2001 of US$72 million. Profits attributable to outside interests for 2002 are reduced by US$166 million as a result of exceptional asset write downs. Lower profits at partly owned operations reduced the amount attributable to outside interests in addition to this impact from exceptional asset write downs. Net earnings at US$736 million were US$206 million below 2001 which reflected the exceptional asset write downs of US$225 million after tax and minorities. Total cash flow from operations increased to US$2,043 million from US$1,992 million in 2001. Lower operating profits were offset by other favourable movements including a reduction in inventories as West Angelas came into production and as a result of an IOC shut down in August. Capital expenditure and financial investment remained at around the same level as 2001 as increased spending on the Comalco Alumina Refinery and Hail Creek compensated for the suspension of expenditure on IOC's Sept-Iles pellet plant and the completion of West Angelas. There were net disposals of US$138 million in 2002. The disposals largely related to units acquired with Peabody's Australian coal businesses in 2001. Acquisitions primarily related to an increase in the Group's interest in lines 1 and 2 at Boyne Smelters. Dividends paid in 2002 included a dividend of US$146 million paid to Rio Tinto plc in relation to the DLC Dividend Share. Rio Tinto Limited received loans of US$87 million from Rio Tinto plc during the year and repaid US$115 million of the consideration outstanding for 91,000,000 of its shares repurchased from Rio Tinto plc in 2000. Net debt decreased from US$3,400 million at 31 December 2001 to US$3,122 million at 31 December 2002 reflecting the cash flow during the period.
Adjusted earningsUK Financial Reporting Standard 3 expressly permits presentation of an adjusted measure of earnings. As presented by Rio Tinto, this excludes the effect of exceptional items of such magnitude that their exclusion is useful in order that adjusted earnings fulfil their purpose of reflecting the Group’s underlying performance. Except where otherwise indicated, earnings contributions from business units and business segments exclude the effect of these exceptional items. Adjusted earnings is reconciled with net earnings on page 82 of the 2003 Annual report and on page A-2 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix. Further information on exceptional items may be found in note 4 on page 91 of the 2003 Annual report and in note 4 on page A-13 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix.
Critical accounting estimatesThe Rio Tinto Group’s critical accounting estimates have been set out on pages 35 to 36 of the 2003 Annual report.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 8
Trend informationThe Group’s worldwide operations supply essential minerals and metals that help to meet global needs and contribute to improvements in living standards, so changes in the demand for its products are closely aligned with changes in global GDP. Changes in the GDP of developing countries will have a greater impact on materials such as iron ore and coal that can be used to improve infrastructure whereas changes in the GDP of developed countries will have a greater impact on industrial minerals that have many applications in consumer products. Trends in total turnover, earnings, cash flow, debt, equity, total capital are set out on pages 2 to 6 of the 2003 Annual report. Trends in the production of the Group’s minerals and metals are set out in the Operational review on pages 37 to 51 of the 2003 Annual report.
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and EmployeesDetails of the Group’s directors, senior management and employees have been set out on pages 57 to 59 of the 2003 Annual report, the Remuneration report has been set out on pages 62 to 69 of the 2003 Annual report and board practices have been explained under Corporate governance on pages 70 to 72 of the 2003 Annual report. Details of post retirement benefits have been set out in note 41 on pages 123 to 128 of the 2003 Annual report and in note 40 on pages A-52 to A-56 of the 2003 Annual report- Appendix. Rio Tinto’s employment policies have been summarised on page 56 of the 2003 Annual report. Employee costs have been set out in note 3 on page 90 of the 2003 Annual report and in note 3 on page A-12 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix, and analyses of the average number of employees by principal location and by business unit have been set out in note 30 on page 117 of the 2003 Annual report and in note 30 on page A-46 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix. As made clear in The way we work, Rio Tinto’s statement of business practice, the Group recognises everyone’s right to choose whether or not they wish to be represented collectively. Details of the Group’s various arrangements for involving directors and employees in its shares are set out in the Remuneration report on pages 62 to 69 of the 2003 Annual report. The tables of the directors’ beneficial interests in shares and their awards under long term incentive plans and options, as included in the Remuneration report, have been updated to the latest practicable date and are reproduced as follows:
Table 3 Directors’ beneficial interests in shares
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 9
Table 4 Awards to directors under long term incentive plans
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 10
Table 5 Directors’ options to acquire Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shares
Rio Tinto’s register of directors’ interests, which is open to inspection, contains full details of directors’ shareholdings and options to subscribe for Rio Tinto shares.
Corporate governanceRio Tinto is committed to high standards of corporate governance, for which the directors are accountable to shareholders. Rio Tinto’s statement on corporate governance, report of its Audit committee and Audit committee charter are set out on pages 70 to 73 of the 2003 Annual report. As a non US company Rio Tinto is permitted to follow home country standards in relation to corporate governance in lieu of complying with most of the provisions of Section 303A of the NYSE’s Listed Company Manual but as from 2005 it will be required to disclose significant differences, if any, between its standards of corporate governance and those followed by US companies under NYSE listing standards.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 11
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
Major shareholdersAs far as is known, Rio Tinto plc is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or by any government. The Capital Group of Companies Inc. by way of a notice dated 5 February 2004 informed the Company of its interest in 65,148,434 ordinary shares representing 6.1 per cent of its shares as at 6 February 2004. Rio Tinto plc does not know of any arrangements which may result in a change in its control. As of 19 March 2004, the total amount of the voting securities owned by the directors of Rio Tinto plc as a group was 153,714 ordinary shares of 10p each representing less than one per cent of the number in issue. As far as is known, Rio Tinto Limited, with the exception of the arrangements for the dual listed companies merger described under Shareholder information on page 77 to 79 of the 2003 Annual report, is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or by any government. As of 19 March 2004, the only person known to Rio Tinto Limited as owning more than five per cent of its shares was Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Limited, which is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc, with 187,439,520 shares, representing 37.56 per cent of its issued capital. Rio Tinto Limited does not know of any arrangements which may result in a change in its control. As of 19 March 2004 the total amount of the voting securities owned by the directors of Rio Tinto Limited as a group was 308,946 shares representing less than one per cent of the number in issue. Except as provided under the DLC Merger Sharing Agreement as explained on page 78 of the 2003 Annual report, the group’s major shareholders have the same voting and other rights as other shareholders. As at 19 March 2004 there were 253 US registered shareholders holding 150,158 shares in Rio Tinto plc, and 214 US registered shareholders holding 310,405 shares in Rio Tinto Limited.
Related party transactionsDetails of the Group’s material related party transactions are set out in note 38 on page 122 of the 2003 Annual report and in note 38 on page A-51 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix. As stated in the Financial review on page 32 of the 2003 Annual report the Group’s financial statements show the full extent of the Group’s financial commitments including debt and similar exposures. The Group’s share of the net debt of joint ventures and associates is also disclosed. It is not the Group’s practice to engineer financial structures as a way of avoiding disclosure.
Item 8. Financial Information
Legal proceedingsNeither Rio Tinto plc nor Rio Tinto Limited nor any of their subsidiaries is a defendant in any proceedings which the directors believe will have a significant effect on either Company’s financial position or results of operations.
DividendsThe Group’s policy on dividend distributions is set out under Shareholder information on page 74 of the 2003 Annual report.
Post balance sheet eventsOn 22 March 2004 Rio Tinto announced that it had reached agreement with Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc (“FCX”) for FCX to acquire for cash all of Rio Tinto’s 23,931,100 FCX shares. The consideration per share will be based on the price used to establish the conversion price of FCX’s convertible preferred stock which will be issued to finance the buy back. Completion, which is subject to a number of conditions, will occur simultaneously with the closing of FCX’s convertible preferred stock offering. Gross proceeds are expected to amount to US$882 million. The sale of FCX shares does not affect the terms of Rio Tinto’s joint venture interest in production from the Grasberg mine which is managed by FCX. There have been no other significant post balance sheet events.
Item 9. The Offer and ListingShare prices and details of the markets on which the Group’s shares are traded are set out under Shareholder information on pages 74 to 75 of the 2003 Annual report. The tables of the high and low share prices for Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shares for the most recent six months have been extended to include February 2004 and are reproduced as follows:
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 12
Item 10. Additional information
Memorandum and Articles of AssociationRio Tinto plc adopted new Articles of Association by Special Resolution passed on 11 April 2002 and Rio Tinto Limited amended its Constitution by Special Resolution on 18 April 2002. These resolutions dealt with the creation of a new special purpose share in each Company to be called a “DLC Dividend Share”. The objective of these shares is to provide improved internal funds management flexibility to the Rio Tinto Group by allowing dividends to be paid between the two parts of the Group. Neither of theses shares has any rights attaching to it, other than the right to dividends as declared by the boards. These resolutions also dealt with some relatively minor technical amendments.
IntroductionAs explained on pages 77 to 79 of the 2003 Annual report under the terms of the dual listed companies (‘DLC’) merger the shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and of Rio Tinto Limited entered into certain contractual arrangements which are designed to place the shareholders of both Companies in substantially the same position as if they held shares in a single enterprise which owned all of the assets of both Companies. Generally and as far as is permitted by the UK Companies Act and the Australian Corporations Law this principle is reflected in the Memorandum and Articles of Association of Rio Tinto plc and in the Constitution of Rio Tinto Limited. The summaries below include descriptions of material rights of the shareholders of both Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited. Unless stated otherwise the Memorandum and Articles of Association of and Constitution are identical. Rio Tinto plc is incorporated under the name “Rio Tinto plc” and is registered in England and Wales with registered number 719885 and Rio Tinto Limited is incorporated under the name “Rio Tinto Limited” and is registered in Australia with ACN Number 004458404. No holder of shares, which may be held in either certificated or uncertificated form, will be required to make any additional contributions of capital.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 13
Rights attaching to Shares Under English law, dividends on shares may only be paid out of profits available for distribution, as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and by the relevant law. Shareholders are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by the directors. The directors may also pay shareholders such interim dividends as appear to them to be justified by the financial position of the Group. Any Rio Tinto plc dividend unclaimed after 12 years from the date the dividend was declared, or became due for payment, will be forfeited and returned to the Company. Any Rio Tinto Limited dividend unclaimed may be invested or otherwise made use of by the board for the benefit of the Company until claimed or otherwise disposed of according to Australian law.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 14
Variation of RightsIf, at any time, the share capital is divided into different classes of shares, the rights attached to any class may be varied, subject to the provisions of the relevant legislation, with the consent in writing of holders of three fourths in value of the shares of that class or upon the adoption of an extraordinary resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of that class. At every such separate meeting, all of the provision of the Articles of Association and Constitution relating to proceedings at a general meeting apply, except that the quorum is to be the number of persons (which must be two or more) who hold or represent by proxy not less than one third in nominal value of the issued shares of the class. The DLC Merger Sharing Agreement provides for the protection of the public shareholders of both Companies and so any variations of rights would be dealt with as ‘Class Rights Actions’ that require the separate approval of the shareholders of both Companies.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 15
Limitations on Voting and ShareholdingThere are no limitations imposed by either law or Rio Tinto plc's Memorandum or Articles of Association or Rio Tinto Limited's Constitution on the right of non-residents or foreign persons to hold or vote the ordinary shares or ADSs, other than the limitations that would generally apply to all shareholders and those that arise from the DLC merger. There are no restrictions under Rio Tinto plc’s Memorandum and Articles of Association or under English law that limit the right of non resident or foreign owners to hold or vote its shares. Nor are there any restrictions under Rio Tinto Limited’s constitution or under Australian law that limit the right of non residents to hold or vote its shares, other than under the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975, see Shareholder information on pages 76 to 77 of the 2003 Annual report for details. A description of the change in control provisions triggered by significant share ownership is set out under Shareholder information on pages 78 to 79 of the 2003 Annual report.
Exchange controlsAt present, there are no exchange controls or other restrictions that affect remittance of the Group’s dividends to US residents, but see Shareholder information on page 76 to 77 of the 2003 Annual report for controls on remittances to certain specified organisations and certain specified targets related to certain specified territories.
Documents on displayRio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited file reports and other information with the SEC. You may read without charge and copy at prescribed rates any document filed at the public reference facilities of the SEC’s principal office at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549, United States of America. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference facilities.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 16
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskThe Rio Tinto Group's policies for currency, interest rate and commodity price exposures, and the use of derivative financial instruments are discussed in the Financial review on pages 32 to 36 of the 2003 Annual report. In addition, the Group's quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are set out in note 28 on pages 111 to 116 of the 2003 Annual report and in note 28 on pages A-39 to A-44 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix. The discussion regarding market risk contains certain forward looking statements and attention is drawn to the Cautionary statement under Item 3 on page 6.
2003 compared with 2002Currency hedges of trading transactions which matured during 2003 have not been replaced by new hedges. The sensitivity of the Group's earnings to currency movements has therefore increased slightly.
Exchange ratesIn any particular year, currency fluctuations may have a significant impact on Rio Tinto's financial results. A weakening of the US dollar against the currencies in which the Group’s costs are incurred has an adverse effect on Rio Tinto’s net earnings. The approximate effect on the Group's net earnings of ten per cent movements from the 2003 full year average exchange rates of the currencies having most impact on costs are as follows:
These sensitivities are based on the prices, costs and volumes for each respective year and assume that all other variables remain constant. They take into account the effect of hedges maturing in each year as disclosed in note 28 on pages 111 to 116 of the 2003 Annual report and in note 28 on pages A-39 to A-44 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix. These exchange rate sensitivities include the effect on operating costs of movements in exchange rates but exclude the impact through revaluation of foreign currency working capital and should therefore be used with care.
Interest ratesBased on the Group's net debt at 31 December 2003 and with other variables unchanged, the approximate effect on the Group's net earnings of a one per cent increase in US dollar LIBOR interest rates would be a reduction of US$30 million (2002: US$40 million based on the Group's net debt at 31 December 2002).
Commodity pricesApproximately 40 per cent (2002: 35 per cent) of Rio Tinto's net earnings from operating businesses came from products whose prices were terminal market related and the remainder came from products priced by direct negotiation. The approximate effect on the Group's net earnings of a ten per cent change from the full year average market price for the following metals would be:
Item 12. Description of Securities other than Equity SecuritiesNot applicable.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 17
PART II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and DelinquenciesNone.
Item 14. Material Modification to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of ProceedsThere are no material modifications to the rights of security holders.
Item 15. Controls and ProceduresThe conclusions of management about the effectiveness of the Rio Tinto Group’s disclosure controls and procedures have been set out on page 80 of the 2003 Annual report.
Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial ExpertDetails relating to the Audit committee financial expert have been set out under Corporate governance on page 72 of the 2003 Annual report.
Item 16B. Code of EthicsRio Tinto’s statement of business practice, The way we work and its supplementary guidance documents, has been described under Corporate governance on page 71 of the 2003 Annual report and can be viewed on the Group’s website at www.riotinto.com.
Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesThe remuneration of the Group’s principal auditors for audit services and other services as well as remuneration payable to other accounting firms has been set out in note 37 on page 121 of the 2003 Annual report and in note 37 on page A-50 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix.
Audit-related regulatory reportingIncludes the audit of employee benefit plans, consultation regarding GAAP and International FRS and assistance and advice in connection with the implementation of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Further assurance servicesIncludes due diligence of potential business acquisitions and disposals.
Tax servicesIncludes tax compliance, involving the preparation or review of tax returns for corporation, income, sales, excise and other taxes and duties, consultancy in relation to tax audits, accounting, restructurings, mergers and acquisitions, advice on transfer pricing and dealing with tax returns for expatriates.
Other servicesIncludes reviews of risk management policies and procedures, forensic investigations, review of actuarial reports, provision of training services and other procedures of an assurance nature.
Rio Tinto has adopted policies designed to uphold the independence of the Group’s principal auditors by prohibiting their engagement to provide a range of accounting and other professional services that might compromise their appointment as independent auditors. The engagement of the Group’s principal auditors to provide statutory audit services, certain other assurance services, tax services and certain limited other services are pre-approved. The engagement of the Group’s principal auditors to provide other permitted services are individually subject to the specific approval of the Audit committee or its chairman. Prior to the commencement of each financial year the Group’s Finance director and its principal auditors submit to the Audit committee a schedule of the types of services that are expected to be performed during the following year for its approval. The Audit committee may impose a US dollar limit on the total value of other permitted services that can be provided. Any non audit service provided by the Group’s principal auditors, where the expected fee exceeds a pre-determined level, must be subject to the Group’s normal tender procedures. However, in exceptional circumstances the Finance director is authorised to engage the Group’s principal auditors to provide such services without going to tender, but if the fees are expected to exceed $250,000 then the chairman of the audit committee must approve the engagement. The Audit committee adopted policies for the pre-approval of permitted services provided by the Group’s principal auditors during January 2003 which were further refined and adopted during September 2003. All of the engagements for services provided by the Group's principal auditors since the adoption of these policies were either within the pre-approval policies or approved by the Audit committee.
Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit CommitteesNot applicable.
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated PurchasersNot applicable.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 18
PART III
Item 17. Financial StatementsNot applicable.
Item 18. Financial StatementsThe financial statements for the Rio Tinto Group and the Report of the Independent Auditors have been set out on pages 81 to 135 of the 2003 Annual report and the separate financial statements for the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Rio Tinto Group and the Report of the Independent Auditors have been set out on pages A-1 to A-75 of the 2003 Annual report Appendix.
Item 19. ExhibitsExhibits marked “*” have been filed as exhibits to this annual report on Form 20-F and other exhibits have been incorporated by reference as indicated.
Index
Exhibit Number Description
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 19
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 20
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 21
SIGNATURE
The Registrants hereby certify that they meet all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that they have duly caused and authorised the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on their behalf.
Rio Tinto 2003 Form 20-F 22
Rio Tinto
Rio Tintois a leader in finding, mining and processing the earths mineral resources. The Groups worldwide operations supply essential minerals and metals that help to meet global needs and contribute to improvements in living standards. Rio Tinto encourages strong local identities and has a devolved management philosophy, entrusting responsibility with accountability to the workplace. In order to deliver superior returns to shareholders over time, Rio Tinto takes a long term and responsible approach to the Groups business. We concentrate on the development of first class orebodies into large, long life and efficient operations, capable of sustaining competitive advantage through business cycles. Major products include aluminium, copper, diamonds, energy products (coal and uranium), gold, industrial minerals (borax, titanium dioxide, salt and talc) and iron ore. The Groups activities span the world but are strongly represented in Australia and North America with significant businesses in South America, Asia, Europe and southern Africa. Wherever Rio Tinto operates, health and safety is our first priority. We seek to contribute to sustainable development. We work as closely as possible with our host countries and communities, respecting laws and customs. We minimise adverse effects and strive to improve every aspect of our performance. We employ local people at all levels and ensure fair and equitable transfer of benefits and enhancement of opportunities.
Cover photograph, stacked aluminium billets at Boyne Island smelter, Australia.
Adjusted earningsUS$m
Cash flow fromoperationsUS$m
Dividends fromassociates andjoint venturesOperating cash flow
Dear shareholderHaving joined the board as a non executive director in 2001, I was delighted to be asked to succeed Sir Robert Wilson as chairman in November 2003. I look forward to working with Leigh Clifford and his executive team and I share fully the Groups long standing commitment to creating shareholder value, delivering operational excellence and embracing sustainable development. My focus will be on corporate governance, strategy and relations with our key stakeholders. I intend to contribute where possible to the Groups continuing efforts to integrate sustainable development into our business. Rio Tinto now represents my principal activity and I will commit whatever time is required to fulfil my role. The year 2003 proved to be challenging for Rio Tinto. As the world economy continued its slow recovery, strong growth in key markets, like China, resulted in significant increases in the prices of some of our key commodities. This was particularly the case with iron ore, copper and alumina. Prices for seaborne thermal and coking coal improved towards the end of the year, but those for industrial minerals remained weak. Unfortunately, revenue gains from higher US dollar prices were mostly offset by the weakness of the US dollar against some of our main producing currencies. We also incurred higher costs as a result of supply and logistical constraints and a number of operational events which affected production at some of our businesses. Our adjusted earnings were US$1,382 million, US$148 million below 2002, while net earnings were US$1,508 million, or 109.5 US cents per share. The term adjusted earnings is defined on page 32. Cash flow from operations was US$3,486 million, only seven per cent below the previous year. Dividends equivalent to 64 US cents per share have been declared for 2003 as a whole compared with 60 US cents in 2002. This also means that the 2004 interim dividend payable in September can be expected to be 32 US cents per share. We continue to manage our assets proactively. Our diversified portfolio includes many world class assets across a range of commodities which continue to provide resilience in earnings as well as attractive growth opportunities. Our current development programme includes major investments in our iron ore, bauxite and alumina operations. New capacity has also recently been added in coking coal and diamonds. During 2004/2005 we plan to
invest approximately US$4 billion in our core businesses. We aim to achieve high standards of corporate governance. Our board consists of nine non executive directors, of whom seven have been assessed by the board to be fully independent, four executive directors and myself as chairman. Collectively, the non executive directors bring an outstanding range of experience which is vital to good governance and corporate accountability in todays world. An account of our level of compliance with both the current and the new, recently introduced, Combined Codes in the UK is given in our discussion of corporate governance starting on page 70. We also comply with the requirements of the Australian Stock Exchange Best Practice Corporate Governance Guidelines and those of other authorities in countries where we have obligations. Lord Tugendhat will be retiring from the board at this years annual meeting after seven years of distinguished contribution, for which we thank him. We welcomed Sir John Kerr, formerly head of the UK Diplomatic Service, to the board in October 2003 and he is standing for election to the board at the forthcoming annual general meetings. This letter would not be complete without special recognition of Sir Robert Wilsons retirement after 33 years of outstanding service to the Group. Bobs vision and strategic leadership were pivotal to a number of major portfolio transactions which have transformed Rio Tinto into the industry leading position it holds today. We thank him for all he has done for the Group, and for shareholders, and wish him well in his new activities. Looking forward to 2004, we expect to see stronger markets for a number of our products. Overall market conditions and increased production from recent investments look encouraging. However, exchange rate developments will be a critical determinant of earnings in 2004. In conclusion, I would like to acknowledge the hard work and dedication of Rio Tintos employees throughout the world in 2003. Their contribution and continuing commitments to our core values is a vital factor in delivering sustained high performance in a challenging world.
Paul Skinner Chairman
2
Graphintentionallyomitted
Product groupearningsUS$m
Note: 2003, 2002 and 2001exclude exceptional items.Product group earnings are stated before exceptional items, netinterest, exploration and evaluation costs and other central items. A reconciliation is shown on page 132.
The year 2003 was characterised by the impact of the weak US dollar eroding margins and by prices which did not strengthen until towards the end of the year. However, strong cash flow and a number of completed and current projects paved the way for strong progress to be sustained in the future. Continuing robust demand from China has presented us with opportunities for growth in a number of commodities.
Operating performanceProduct group earnings were US$1,584 million, compared with US$1,776 million in 2002. Market conditions remained difficult for much of the year. An additional challenge was the rapid depreciation of the US dollar against most major currencies which had a significant effect on our earnings. Periods of US dollar weakness have been typically associated with stronger commodity prices. We saw metals prices responding to the weaker dollar in the second half of the year. However, our US based businesses benefited from higher copper and gold prices without incurring additional production costs. Demand for iron ore, alumina, coking coal and diamonds has been strong. Towards the end of the year there was improved demand and prices for thermal coal from Australia. The unprecedented demand for iron ore is stretching our infrastructure. Capacity and infrastructure expansions at Hamersley Iron and Robe River are under way involving expenditure of more than US$1 billion.
Strategy Rio Tinto has had a very consistent strategy resulting in long term shareholder returns superior to those delivered by most of our peers. Fundamentally, we remain convinced that our competitive advantage is in mining, and that returns are best in the upstream part of the industry. Furthermore, we believe that the best returns are delivered by large, long life, low cost orebodies that often have the potential for further development in the future. In order to maximise the value of these high quality assets we focus on operational excellence. Our growth comes from creating options and recognising opportunities. We do not set growth targets but look at the quality of each investment opportunity on its merits. The strength of our balance sheet coupled with the resilience of our cash flows enables us to invest in projects throughout the economic cycle. Across our portfolio we have a range of value creating opportunities and numerous options for future growth.
New projects Because our strength lies in long life assets, we have the capability in the current environment to increase production in line with demand. We have recently invested heavily in copper, alumina, iron ore and diamonds. We are especially pleased with the Diavik diamond project in Canada, which reinforces our
position in the diamond industry. We opened the Hail Creek coking coal mine in Australia just as demand was firming and Comalcos alumina refinery in Australia, which will make us a major player in the alumina market, is on track to ship its first product in early 2005. Opportunities to invest have been enhanced considerably by Chinas ongoing demand for raw materials. While there will undoubtedly be hiccups along Chinas growth path, fundamentally we believe the underlying trend for industrialisation in China presents a significant opportunity for the mining industry. We have positioned Rio Tinto to take its fair share of a market, the size of which has no precedent in our industry. Hail Creek coking coal is a huge resource, giving us options for expansion as market demand allows. In iron ore, we are expanding capacity significantly. We have options for expansion of the new Comalco Alumina Refinery which will increase the demand for bauxite from Weipa. In 2003, we pursued opportunities for asset disposals in a patient and disciplined manner. We sold our interests in Minera Alumbrera, Peak Gold, Kaltim Prima Coal and a number of exploration projects that did not fit our investment criteria. The sale of Fortaleza in Brazil was also agreed in 2003. Following our Exploration groups evaluation of the large Resolution copper deposit in the US, the project was transferred to the Copper group in 2003 for further study.
Iron oreIron ore shipments were at an all time high, and we celebrated our 30th anniversary of iron ore exports to China. Rio Tinto shipped more than 100 million tonnes of iron ore in 2003. In December, we announced an investment of US$920 million to increase output at Hamersley Iron. This involves increasing Dampier port capacity to 116 million tonnes per annum by late 2005, from the current 74 million tonnes per annum capacity, and expanding the Yandicoogina mine to produce 36 million tonnes per annum by early 2005 from the 24 million tonnes per annum capacity it will achieve in 2004. The Robe River joint venture approved a US$105 million expansion of the new West Angelas mine from 20 million tonnes per annum to 25 million tonnes. Rio Tintos managed iron ore infrastructure capacity in Australia is currently about 130 million tonnes per annum. These investments will take this to about 170 million tonnes by 2006.
EnergyOur energy businesses were challenged by weak markets for most of 2003. Continuing pit stability issues affected production in the US. In Australia, the formation of Rio Tinto Coal Australia unified management of our coal interests in New South Wales and Queensland. We increased our production of hard
Chief executives report continued
Net debt: total capital%
coking coal with the commencement of the Hail Creek mine, and the opening of the Ti Tree area at the Kestrel mine. Chinese steel mills have shown considerable interest in the Hail Creek product, indicating potential for a faster ramp up of production than was initially planned.
Industrial mineralsDemand for industrial minerals is related to the performance of mature economies, which have been weak. Market conditions in 2003 were consequently very difficult. To varying degrees, all products borates, talc, titanium dioxide, salt have had to contend with soft markets in 2003. In the case of salt and titanium dioxide, the situation has been compounded by new supply and high customer stocks. We have curtailed production and taken action to mitigate the impact of lower production on the cost base, in anticipation of markets continuing to be oversupplied. In the case of our boric acid and upgraded slag expansions, we are allocating resources in areas where we see good opportunities for growth. Our industrial minerals assets are of high quality and capital demands have been low in recent years so cash generation continues to be solid.
AluminiumIn aluminium, our main focus is the development of our alumina business. The options we have to expand mean that we could be a six million tonnes per annum alumina producer within a decade. Our two major projects in Queensland are working towards this goal. Two years into construction, our new alumina refinery at Gladstone will come on stream at a rate of 1.4 million tonnes per annum late in 2004. Designed to have an ultimate annual capacity of over four million tonnes, we are already looking at a phase two expansion. At Weipa, the source of the high quality bauxite that underpins our alumina business, we are increasing annual production to 16.5 million tonnes from the current capacity of 12 million tonnes. Three million tonnes of this capacity is required to support stage one of the new alumina refinery.
Copper A slippage and subsequent debris flow at the Grasberg mine in Indonesia late in the year affected earnings in the fourth quarter. Despite this event and depressed prices for most of the year, our Copper group was able to maintain a robust earnings performance. We are well positioned to benefit from an upturn in the market. We have invested a total of US$850 million at Palabora, Escondida, Northparkes and Grasberg, and these projects are expected to be at full production by 2005. We have made significant progress at Kennecott Utah Copper in the US to improve performance. The finalisation of a labour agreement in June, work practice changes in the mine, together with the implementation of 12 hour shifts, have resulted in a significant improvement in productivity.
DiamondsDiamonds have become a major product for Rio Tinto. About a quarter of our exploration expenditure is devoted to the search for diamonds, mainly in Canada, but also in India. The Diavik diamond mine was completed ahead of schedule and within budget. The process plant reached design throughput of 1.5 million tonnes of ore per annum six months ahead of schedule. We have established a strategic planning team separate from mine operations to look at options, including underground mining and construction of a second dike to open a third kimberlite pipe. Initial production from Diavik entered a robust diamond market and we have enjoyed good sales volumes and prices significantly higher than the feasibility study projections. At the same time, Argyle in Australia benefited from the sale of stockpiled inventory.
Safety, health, environmentand communitiesWe place the utmost importance on health and safety in the workplace. While our record compares very well with our own and other industries, the rate of improvement towards our goal of zero injuries levelled off in 2003. Rigorous compliance with the Rio Tinto safety standards and increased visible
4
leadership from all levels of management is expected. The 2003 winners of the Chief Executives Safety Award were US Boraxs Boron mine in California, Rio Tinto Brasils Morro do Ouro gold mine and Comalcos Tiwai Point aluminium smelter in New Zealand. The award recognises outstanding performance as a leadership example for other Group operations. Despite our strenuous efforts, I very much regret to have to report that there were six deaths at operations we manage in 2003; three were Group employees and three were contractors. There were 468 lost time incidents during the year, a four per cent decrease from 2002. The frequency rate was 0.81 compared with 0.85 in 2002. By the end of 2003, 80 per cent of our managed operations had implemented the ISO 14001 environmental management system (EMS) or equivalent. We are now requiring all operations to certify their EMS by mid 2005. To complement the safety standards we are implementing Group wide occupational health and environment standards. We are targeting fewer workplace exposures and new cases of occupational disease. We seek improved efficiency of greenhouse gas emissions, energy use and fresh water withdrawn from the environment. Specific five year targets have been integrated into business plans to ensure that fully resourced and costed action plans are in place to achieve them. We made further progress in integrating sustainable development practices and approaches into our activities. Most businesses have appointed cross functional teams to implement a sustainable development framework appropriate to local circumstances, and efforts are being made to formalise the incorporation of relevant criteria into key business decisions. All of our businesses continued to report social and environmental performance to their local communities. Increasingly, this includes community verification.
OutlookWhile 2003 was challenging, the Groups strong fundamentals ensured a satisfactory operating and financial result. We are ready to
benefit from improving economic conditions. In 2003, the world economy ended in better shape, with growth in China being a significant factor. Together with the cyclical upswing in the US and in other developed economies, significant pressure is being exerted on mineral raw materials markets. Iron ore and coking coal are particularly short whilst copper is getting rapidly tighter. Deferral of production at Grasberg due to the slippage event will, however, affect copper production. The major economic uncertainty ahead lies in the currency markets, both with respect to possible impacts on our costs expressed in US dollars, and the responses which further moves in exchange rates might provoke from economic policy makers. Our natural hedge against the weakening US dollar provided by strengthening prices for our diverse product range protects us to some extent, as does our policy of borrowing at floating interest rates, but the relative value of the US dollar remains a key uncertainty. Considering the expansion plans we have announced, and the strong outlook for a number of our products on the back of growth in China, we see a promising medium to long term outlook, with our performance underpinned by some of the best mining assets in the world. Finally, whatever the mix of challenge and opportunity, I am delighted to be supported by a very strong management team and employees of the highest calibre. In the end, it is the quality of people that makes the difference in delivering long term value. Recognising this, we are increasing our focus on developing a cadre of future leaders. I believe that Rio Tinto is exceptionally well placed in this regard to continue to deliver value to our shareholders.
Leigh Clifford Chief executive
Gross turnoverUS$m
Capital expenditure andfinancial investmentUS$m
A reconciliation ofadjusted earnings with net earnings isincluded on page 82.
Net earningsUS$m
Net earnings in 2001,2002 and 2003 wereafter exceptional items.
Adjusted earningsper shareUS cents
Net earnings per shareUS cents
Dividends per shareUS cents
UK pence
Australian cents
Total capitalUS$m
Risk factors and cautionary statement
RISK FACTORSThe following describes some of the risks that could affect Rio Tinto. In addition, some risks may be unknown to Rio Tinto and other risks, currently believed to be immaterial, could turn out to be material. These risks, whether individual or simultaneous occurrences, could significantly affect the Groups business and financial results. They should also be considered in connection with any forward looking statements in this document and the cautionary statement below.
Economic conditionsCommodity prices, and demand for the Groups products, are influenced strongly by world economic growth, particularly that in the US and China. The Groups normal policy is to sell its products at prevailing market prices. Commodity prices can fluctuate widely and could have a material and adverse impact on the Groups asset values, revenues, earnings and cash flows. Further discussion can be found on page 11, Business environment and markets, and on page 34, Commodity prices.
Exchange ratesThe Groups assets, earnings and cash flows are influenced by a wide variety of currencies due to the geographic diversity of the Groups sales and the countries in which it operates. The US dollar is the currency in which the majority of the Groups sales are denominated. The Australian and US dollars are the most important currencies influencing costs. The relative value of currencies can fluctuate widely and could have a material and adverse impact on the Groups revenues, earnings and cash flows. Further discussion can be found on page 34, Exchange rates, reporting currencies and currency exposure.
AcquisitionsThe Group has grown partly through the acquisition of other businesses. There are numerous risks commonly encountered in business combinations and Rio Tinto cannot ensure that management will be able effectively to integrate businesses acquired, or generate the cost savings and synergies anticipated. Failure to do so could have a material and adverse impact on the Groups costs, earnings and cash flows.
Exploration and new projectsThe Group seeks to identify new mining properties through an active exploration programme. However, there is no guarantee that such expenditure will be recouped or that the existing mineral reserves will be replaced. Failure to do so could have a material and adverse impact on the Groups financial results and prospects. The Group develops new mining properties and expands its existing operations as a means of generating shareholder value. However, there are increasing regulatory, environmental and
social approvals required that can potentially result in significant increases in construction costs and/or significant delays in construction. These increases could materially and adversely impact upon a projects economics, the Groups asset values, costs, earnings and cash flows.
Reserve estimationThere are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating ore reserves. Reserves that are valid at the time of estimation may change significantly when new information becomes available. Fluctuations in the price of commodities, exchange rates, increased production costs or reduced recovery rates may render lower grade reserves uneconomic and may, ultimately, result in a restatement. A significant restatement could have a material and adverse impact on the Groups asset values, costs, cash flows and earnings.
Political and communityThe Group has operations in some countries where varying degrees of political instability exist. Political instability can result in civil unrest, expropriation, nationalisation, renegotiation or nullification of existing contracts, mining leases and permits or other agreements, changes in laws, taxation policies or currency restrictions. Any of these can have a material adverse impact upon the profitability or, in extreme cases, the viability of an operation. Some of the Groups current and potential operations are located in or near communities that may now, or in the future, regard such an operation as having a detrimental effect on their economic and social circumstances. Should this occur, it might have a material adverse impact upon the profitability or, in extreme cases, the viability of an operation. In addition, such an event may adversely affect the Groups ability to enter into new operations.
TechnologyThe Group has invested in and conducts information system and operational initiatives. Several technical aspects of these initiatives are still unproven and the eventual operational outcome or commercial viability cannot be assessed with certainty.Accordingly, the costs and benefits from participating and investing in new technologies and the consequent effects on the Groups future earnings and financial results may vary widely from present expectations.
Land and resource tenureThe Group operates in several countries where title to land and rights in respect of land and resources (including indigenous title) are sometimes unclear and disputes may arise over resource development. Such disputes could disrupt some mining projects and/or impede the Groups ability to develop new mining properties.
Health, safety and environmentRio Tinto operates in an industry that is subject to numerous health, safety and environmental laws and regulations and community expectations. Evolving regulatory standards and expectations can result in increased litigation and/or increased capital, operating, compliance and remediation costs all of which can have a material and adverse impact on earnings and cash flows.
Mining operationsMining operations are vulnerable to a number of circumstances beyond the Groups control, including transport disruption, weather and other natural disasters such as cyclones and flooding, unexpected maintenance problems, collapse or damage to pit walls, unexpected geological variations and industrial actions. These can affect costs at particular mines for varying periods. Mining, smelting and refining processes also rely on key inputs, for example fuel and electricity. Appropriate insurance can provide protection from some, but not all, of the costs that may arise from unforeseen events. Disruption to the supply of key inputs, or changes in their pricing, may have a material and adverse impact on the Groups costs, earnings and cash flows.
RehabilitationCosts associated with rehabilitating land disturbed during the mining process and addressing environmental, health and community issues are estimated and provided for based on the most current information available. However, there is a risk that estimates may be insufficient and/or further issues may be identified. Any underestimated or unidentified rehabilitation costs will reduce earnings and could materially and adversely affect the Groups financial results and cash flows.
Non managed operationsRio Tinto cannot guarantee that local management of mining and processing assets where it does not have managerial control will comply with the Groups standards or objectives, nor that they continually maintain effective policies, procedures and controls, including disclosure and reporting controls, over their assets.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ABOUT FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTSThis document contains certain forward looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of the Rio Tinto Group. The words intend, aim, project, anticipate, estimate, plan, believes, expects, may, should, will, or similar expressions, commonly identify such forward looking statements. Examples of forward looking statements in this Annual report include those regarding estimated reserves, anticipated production or construction commencement dates, costs, outputs and productive lives of
Risk factors and cautionary statement continued
assets or similar factors. Forward looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors set forth in this document that are beyond the Groups control. For example, future reserves will be based in part on market prices that may vary significantly from current levels. These may materially affect the timing and feasibility of particular developments. Other factors include the ability to produce and transport products profitably, the impact of foreign currency exchange rates on market prices and operating costs, and activities by governmental authorities, such as changes in taxation or regulation, and political uncertainty. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, actual results could be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by these forward looking statements. The Group does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events. The Group cannot guarantee that its forward looking statements will not differ materially from actual results.
About Rio Tinto
INTRODUCTIONRio Tinto Limited and Rio Tinto plc operate as one business organisation, referred to, in this report as Rio Tinto, the Rio Tinto Group or, more simply, the Group. These collective expressions are used for convenience only since both Companies and the individual companies in which they directly or indirectly own investments are separate and distinct legal entities. Limited, plc, Pty, Inc, Limitada, or SA has generally been omitted from Group company names, except to distinguish between Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited. Financial data in United States dollars (US$) is derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Rio Tinto Groups consolidated financial statements which are in US$. In general, financial data in pounds sterling (£) and Australian dollars (A$) has been translated from the consolidated financial statements at the rates shown on page 153 and has been provided solely for convenience; exceptions arise where data, such as directors remuneration, can be extracted directly from source records. Certain key information has been provided in all three currencies on page 136. Rio Tinto Group turnover, profit before tax and net earnings, and operating assets for 2002 and 2003 attributable to the Groups products and geographical areas, are shown in notes 26 and 27 to the Financial statements on pages 106 to 110. In the Operational review, operating assets and turnover are consistent with the financial information by business unit on pages 132 and 133. The tables on pages 13 to 16 show production for 2001, 2002 and 2003 and include estimates of proved and probable reserves and mineral resources. The weights and measures used are mainly metric units; conversions into other units are shown on page 153. Words and phrases, often technical, have been used which have particular meanings; definitions of these terms are on pages 150 to 152.AN OVERVIEW OF RIO TINTO Rio Tinto is a leading international mining group, combining Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited in a dual listed companies (DLC) structure as a single economic entity. Nevertheless, both Companies remain legal entities with separate share listings and registers. Rio Tinto plc is incorporated in England and Wales and Rio Tinto Limited is incorporated in Australia. Rio Tintos international headquarters is in London whilst the Australian representative office in Melbourne provides support for operations, undertakes external and investor relations and fulfils statutory obligations there. For legal purposes, Rio Tintos US agent is Shannon Crompton, Secretary of Rio Tintos US holding companies, 8309 West 3595 South, Magna, Utah 84044. Investor relations in the US are provided by Makinson Cowell US Limited, One Penn Plaza, 250 W 34th St,
Suite 1935, New York, NY 10119. Rio Tintos address and telephone details are shown on the inside back cover of this report.
Objective, strategy and management structure Rio Tintos fundamental objective is to maximise the overall long term return to its shareholders by operating responsibly and sustainably in areas of proven expertise where the Group has competitive advantage. Its strategy is to maximise the net present value per share by investing in large, long life, cost competitive mines. Investments are driven by the quality of opportunity, not choice of commodity. Rio Tintos substantial mining interests are diverse both in geography and product. The Group consists of wholly and partly owned subsidiaries, joint ventures, associated companies and joint arrangements, the principal ones being listed in notes 31 to 34 of the Financial statements on pages 118 to 120. Rio Tintos management structure is designed to facilitate a clear focus on business performance and the Groups objective. The management structure, which is reflected in this report, is based on principal product and global support groups:
2003 FINANCIAL SUMMARY On 31 December 2003, Rio Tinto plc had a market capitalisation of £16.5 billion (US$29.3 billion) and Rio Tinto Limited had a market capitalisation of A$18.6 billion (US$13.9 billion). The combined Groups market capitalisation in publicly held shares at the end of 2003 was US$38.0 billion. At 31 December 2003, Rio Tinto had consolidated operating assets of US$15.8 billion; 56 per cent were located in Australia and New Zealand and 31 per cent in North America. Group turnover, or sales revenue, in 2003 was US$11.8 billion (or US$9.2 billion excluding Rio Tintos share of joint ventures and associates turnover). Net earnings in 2003 were US$1,508 million.
HistoryRio Tinto plc was formed in 1962 by the merger of two English companies, The Rio Tinto Company and The Consolidated Zinc Corporation. At the same time, the Australian interests of these two companies were also merged to form Rio Tinto Limited. The Rio Tinto Company was formed in 1873 to mine ancient copper workings at Rio Tinto in southern Spain. The
Consolidated Zinc Corporation was incorporated in 1905, initially to treat zinc bearing mine waste at Broken Hill, New South Wales, Australia. Between 1962 and 1995, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited discovered important mineral deposits, developed major mining projects and also grew through acquisition. Their DLC merger in 1995 was structured to ensure that, as far as possible, the shareholders of both Companies are in substantially the same economic position as if they held shares in a single enterprise which owns all the Companies assets. A more detailed description of the DLC can be found on page 77. Following the DLC merger, Rio Tinto has continued to invest in developments and acquisitions in keeping with its strategy.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTSShare buybacks and issues 2003 In April 2003, Rio Tinto plc shareholders renewed approvals for the buyback of up to ten per cent of its own shares. Rio Tinto Limited is authorised by shareholder approvals obtained in 1999 to buy back up to 100 per cent of Rio Tinto Limited shares held by Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc) plus, on market, and up to ten per cent of the publicly held capital in any 12 month period. Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited will seek renewal of their existing shareholder approvals at their respective annual general meetings in 2004. The number of shares, if any, which may be bought back under these authorities will continue to be determined by the directors, based on what they consider to be in the best interests of the continuing shareholders. In the year to 31 December 2003, neither Rio Tinto plc nor Rio Tinto Limited purchased any publicly held shares for cancellation in either Company. However, a further 1,192,702 Rio Tinto plc and 240,466 Rio Tinto Limited shares were issued in respect of the Companies employee share plans. During the year, options for a further 2,696,000 Rio Tinto plc and 1,627,000 Rio Tinto Limited shares were granted under Rio Tintos share plans.
Share buybacks and issues 2001-2002 In 2001, 398,000 Rio Tinto plc and 10,000 Rio Tinto Limited shares were issued in connection with the completion of the acquisition of Ashton Mining. An additional 681,000 Rio Tinto plc and 79,000 Rio Tinto Limited shares were issued in respect of the Companies employee share plans which were extended to subsidiary companies worldwide. In aggregate, approximately 24 per cent of eligible employees took out a savings contract for a fixed monthly amount over periods of up to five years and were granted options over 1.0 million Rio Tinto plc shares and 1.4 million Rio Tinto Limited shares. Rio Tinto plc converted its share warrants
About Rio Tinto continued
to bearer to registered ordinary shares in June 2001. In 2002, a further 887,000 Rio Tinto plc and 360,000 Rio Tinto Limited shares were issued in respect of the Companies employee share plans and options were granted over 2.6 million Rio Tinto plc shares and 2.2 million Rio Tinto Limited shares. During 2001-2002, neither Rio Tinto plc nor Rio Tinto Limited purchased any publicly held shares for cancellation in either Company.
Operations divested 2003 The sale of Rio Tintos 25 per cent interest in Minera Alumbrera Limited in Argentina, together with its wholly owned Peak Gold mine in New South Wales, Australia, was completed in March 2003. Cash consideration was US$210 million. On 21 July 2003 Rio Tinto and BP announced that they had agreed to sell their interests in Kaltim Prima Coal for a cash price of US$500 million, including assumed debt, to PT Bumi Resources, a public company listed on the Jakarta and Surabaya Stock Exchanges. The sale was completed on10 October and each company received 50 per cent of the net proceeds. Rio Tinto announced in late December the sale of its 100 per cent interest in the nickel mining and smelting company Mineração Serra da Fortaleza in Brazil. The final consideration, which is dependent on the forward nickel price, is expected to be at least US$90 million. The transaction was completed during January 2004.
Operations acquired and divested 2001 2002 In January 2001, Coal & Allied Industries acquired the Peabody Groups Australian coal businesses for US$455 million and the assumption of US$100 million in debt. Rio Tinto acquired an additional 1.83 per cent interest in Coal & Allied on market for US$15 million in March 2001. In April 2001, Rio Tintos 50 per cent share of the Norzink smelter was sold for an after tax gain of US$54 million. Rio Tinto sold North Forest Products for US$171 million in May. Following a review, Rio Tinto also sold its 34.8 per cent interest in Aurora Gold as well as other minority interests acquired with Ashton Mining whilst increasing its interest in Ashton Mining of Canada to 63.8 per cent. Rio Tintos offer resulted in it purchasing, for US$56 million, units representing 20.3 per cent of the Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Income Fund (LIORF). In July, Rio Tinto purchased additional shares in Palabora Mining, increasing its interest by some 0.7 per cent to 49.2 per cent. Dampier Salt acquired Cargill Australias Port Hedland operation for US$95 million and contingent performance payments not exceeding US$15 million in aggregate. With effect from September 2001, Comalco acquired an additional 8.3 per cent in Queensland Alumina for US$189 million,
taking its overall interest to 38.6 per cent. Rio Tinto acquired the Three Springs talc mine in Western Australia for US$28 million in the same month. In January 2002, Kennecott Energy (KEC) purchased the North Jacobs Ranch coal reserves for US$380 million, payable in installments over a five year period. The reserves are adjacent to KECs existing Jacobs Ranch operation and provide a basis for low cost expansion in line with market demand. Following the purchase of outstanding units in the Western Australian Diamond Trust, Rio Tintos interest in Argyle Diamonds increased from 99.8 per cent to 100 per cent. In August, Comalco completed the acquisition of an additional 9.5 per cent interest in reduction lines 1 and 2 of the Boyne Island Smelter for US$78.5 million. This increased Comalcos share in lines 1 and 2 of the smelter to 59.5 per cent from 50 per cent. The interest in line 3 remained unchanged at 59.25 per cent. During the first half of 2002, Coal & Allied completed the sale of its interest in the Moura Joint Venture for US$166 million and in Narama and Ravensworth for US$64 million. These were classified as assets held for resale and consequently their disposal had no effect on net earnings. In September, Rio Tinto acquired for cash in the market a further three per cent in Coal & Allied to bring its shareholding to 75.7 per cent. As a result of a refinancing in December 2002, in which LIORF chose not to participate, Rio Tintos interest in Iron Ore Company of Canada increased from 56.1 to 58.7 per cent.
Development projects 2003 Rio Tinto invested US$1.6 billion in 2003 on capital projects around the world. The Diavik diamond project in the Northwest Territories, Canada, was completed well ahead of schedule and within budget. Initial production commenced from the contact zone above the orebody with the main orebody accessed during the second half of 2003. Construction of the US$100 million second block cave at the underground Northparkes copper gold mine in New South Wales, Australia was delayed by ground control problems. Production from the first underground block cave ceased in early 2003 to be replaced by the Lift 2 block cave which is expected to commence production in 2004. Production ramp up at Palaboras US$460 million underground copper mine in South Africa was constrained by an inability to clear drawpoints blocked by poorly fragmented, large rocks. Further work resulted in design capacity of 30,000 tonnes per day being reached intermittently by the end of 2003. Development of the Escondida Norte satellite deposit at the 30 per cent owned Escondida copper mine in Chile was started
in June 2003 to provide mill feed to keep Escondidas capacity above 1.2 million tonnes of copper per year to the end of 2008. First production is expected by the end of 2005. Commissioning of the new US$1,045 million, 110,000 tonnes of ore per day Laguna Seca concentrator was completed in the second quarter of 2003. Expansion of the Weipa bauxite mine in Queensland, Australia, is underway to increase production capacity to 16.5 million tonnes per year in support of the requirements of the new Comalco Alumina Refinery. A key component of the US$150 million expenditure is a 9.5 million tonne beneficiation plant to allow mining of lower grade ores. The project is expected to be completed in 2004. Construction of Comalcos US$750 million alumina refinery at Gladstone, Queensland, proceeds on schedule with US$576 million spent to date. Initial shipments from the 1.4 million tonne per year plant are expected in early 2005. Options exist to expand capacity to more than four million tonnes per year. Pacific Coal completed development of the US$255 million Hail Creek coking coal project in Queensland, Australia with a capacity of 5.5 million tonnes annually. Construction began in January 2003 on an expanded US$200 million HIsmelt® plant at Kwinana in Western Australia. The plant is expected to be commissioned in late 2004 and reach full production of 800,000 tonnes of iron per year in the first half of 2006. Development of the 54 per cent owned Eastern Range iron ore mine with a capacity of ten million tonnes per year continued. First shipments are expected in the first half of 2004. In the first quarter of 2003, Freeport Indonesia completed an expansion to 35,000 tonnes of ore per day of its Deep Ore Zone (DOZ) project at a cost of US$34 million. Kennecott Lands Project Daybreak in Utah, US, a mixed use land development on a 1,800 hectare site, was commenced in 2003 with land sales planned to start in 2004 and ramp up over a period of five to six years. A major US$920 million expansion of Hamersley Irons Dampier port and Yandicoogina mine in Western Australia was announced during December 2003. Further detail on these investments and projects is provided in the Operational review on pages 37 to 56. Development projects have been funded using the US commercial paper market, the 2003 bond issue, the European medium term note facility and internally generated funds.
Development projects 2001 2002 In the US, Kennecott Utah Copper closed its North Concentrator in December 2001. Work on the Robe River Joint Ventures US$450 million West Angelas iron ore mine and port facilities in Western Australia was completed in mid 2002 and the first shipments were made. The mine is expected
to be operating at an annualised rate of 20 million tonnes by the end of the first quarter of 2004, two years earlier than originally scheduled. The Robe River partners agreed to share rail infrastructure with Hamersley Iron. Freeport Indonesias Deep Ore Zone (DOZ) underground block cave project was declared fully operational from 1 October, 2002. This achieved design capacity of 25,000 tonnes of ore per day in 2002, a year earlier than originally projected. Pacific Coal began development of the Hail Creek coking coal project in Queensland, Australia.
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND MARKETSOverviewThe world economy continued its uncertain recovery in 2003, global output rising 3.3 per cent, slightly more than the three per cent of 2002. The volume of world trade grew at around three per cent, similar to the rate achieved in 2002, but well below the six per cent average of the previous 20 years. The year began slowly with uncertainties over the strength of the US economy and mounting concerns over the possible impact of a war with Iraq causing growth in OECD countries to stall. Successive US interest rates cuts, coupled with tax cuts and the conclusion of the war in April, helped to reverse the trend, producing a very much stronger second half of the year. Low interest rates in particular helped boost the housing market and support US consumer spending. The renewed strength of US demand, however, aggravated the countrys already sizeable current account imbalance and pushed down the US dollar, particularly against the euro and against the currencies of commodity producing countries such as Australia, Canada and South Africa. The economies of Europe and Japan followed a similar pattern to that of the US, only in a weaker form and with a lag. Growth in the euro zone was restrained by the maintenance of a relatively tight economic policy environment and by the impact on export growth of the strong euro. Germany, the largest economy in Europe, recorded three negative quarters of growth up to the middle of 2003 and, for the year as a whole, failed to grow at all. Like Europe, Japan also suffered from weak domestic demand although in contrast to Europe its exports enjoyed the benefits of strong import demand from China. Japans GDP for the year as a whole rose a surprisingly robust 2.3 per cent. Much the most dynamic market during the year was China. Despite suffering the disruptive effects of an outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) through the second quarter, China bounced back to record another remarkable year of economic growth. Lifted by high levels of investment and rapidly growing exports, GDP grew nine per cent while industrial production was up 17 per cent. The emphasis of Chinas growth
on materials intensive sectors of industry and construction resulted in the demand for a number of metals, including steel, copper and aluminium, rising by over 20 per cent during the year. With China providing a consistent underpinning of global demand for mineral commodities, the gradual recovery in demand in the OECD countries during the second half of the year produced a quickening of the pace in commodity markets, leading them to end the year on a generally high note. The market for seaborne iron ore enjoyed another strong year, its fourth successive year of growth, assisted by a 33 per cent increase in Chinas ore imports. After producers achieved a price increase of around nine per cent during the annual contract negotiations in May, the market continued to tighten. The high level of deliveries also created acute pressures in the market for bulk shipping resulting in record freight rates. The seaborne market for steam coal started the year more slowly and contract prices in the Asian market were reduced for the second year in succession. As the year progressed, however, market conditions began to improve and by the fourth quarter, with the strength of domestic demand restricting Chinas capacity to export, spot prices surged ahead of contract levels. With demand concentrated more heavily on the more mature economies, the market for industrial minerals such as borates and titanium dioxide did not experience the full benefit of Chinas robust economic performance. Although the second half of the year represented an improvement on the first, rates of demand growth generally fell short of those achieved by metals. Responding to the broader trends of the global economy, the markets for non ferrous metals stalled in their upward course during March and April, before climbing from May through to the end of the year. Firming demand and declining stocks helped underpin this shift in the market, but prices also appear to have been boosted by fund buying in anticipation of future economic growth and US dollar weakness. Global demand for copper increased around four per cent during 2003, China being by far the worlds strongest market. With mine output restrained by the low level of investment in recent years, refined metal production was unable to respond to rising demand and metal stocks fell around 300,000 tonnes. Spot prices trended upwards for most of the year, achieving an average of 80.7 US cents a pound for the year as a whole compared to 70.6 US cents in 2002. Demand growth for aluminium in 2003, at eight per cent, was even more buoyant than that for copper. However, strong Chinese production of aluminium meant that the market did not experience coppers deficits. Price growth for aluminium was accordingly more subdued, an average spot price of
65 US cents per pound compared with 61 US cents per pound in 2002. The spot price for alumina, the raw material for producing aluminium, rose very sharply during the year and by the end of the year a shortage of alumina was beginning to constrain world metal output. Like non ferrous metals, gold felt the effects of growing speculative influences and the weakening of the US dollar. Prices rose through much of the year. The average price for the year was US$363 per ounce, compared with US$309 in 2002. Also helping to support prices, a number of gold producers who had previously hedged their gold sales bought back their positions, effectively adding to gold demand. A discussion of the financial results for the three years to 31 December 2003 is given in the Financial review on pages 32 to 36. Comments on the financial performance of the individual product groups for the three years to 31 December 2003 are included in the Operational review on pages 37 to 56. Details of production, reserves and resources, and information on Group mines are given on pages 13 to 24 and 26 to 31, respectively. Analyses of Rio Tintos revenues by product group, geographical origin and geographical destination have been set out in Financial information by business unit on page 132 and note 27 to the Financial statements on pages 108 to 110.
Marketing channels Each business within each product group is responsible for the marketing and sale of their respective metal and mineral production. Rio Tinto therefore has numerous marketing channels, which now include electronic marketplaces, with differing characteristics and pricing mechanisms. In general, Rio Tintos businesses contract their metal and mineral production direct to end users under long term supply contracts and at prevailing market prices. Typically, these contracts specify annual volume commitments and an agreed mechanism for determining prices, for example, businesses producing non ferrous metals and minerals reference their sales prices to the London Metal Exchange (LME) or other metal exchanges such as the Commodity Exchange Inc (Comex) in New York. Fluctuations in these prices, particularly for aluminium, copper and gold, inevitably affect the Groups financial results. Businesses producing iron ore would typically reference their sales prices to annually negotiated industry benchmarks. In markets where international reference market prices do not exist or are not transparent, businesses negotiate product prices on an individual customer basis. Rio Tintos marketing channels include a network of regional sales offices worldwide. Some products in certain geographical markets are sold via third party agents or to major trading companies.
Governmental regulationsRio Tinto is subject to extensive governmental regulations that affect all aspects of its operations, and consistently seeks to apply best practice in all of its activities. Due to Rio Tintos product and geographical spread, there is unlikely to be any single governmental regulation that could have a material effect on the Groups business. Native title has, since 1992, been accepted as a part of Australias common law. The Native Title Act 1993 provides, amongst other things, a framework for the validation of title, including mining tenements, that might be affected by the existence of native title; the determination of native title claims; a right to negotiate process with respect to the grant of new exploration and mining tenements and certain compulsory acquisitions of land; and the negotiation and registration of indigenous land use agreements. US based operations are subject to local environmental legislation. The South African Department of Mines has published a scorecard by which companies will be judged on their progress with black economic empowerment and the attainment, for value, of the target for 26 per cent ownership in ten years. In addition, new royalty payments are to be introduced that will be calculated on a gross sales value basis in relation to any minerals extracted.
Metals and minerals production
Metals and minerals production continued
Production data notes
Ore reserves
Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources in this report (for Rio Tinto managed operations) are reported in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves, September 1999 (the JORC Code) as required by the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX). Codes or Guidelines similar to JORC with only minor regional variations have been adopted in South Africa, Canada, US, UK, Ireland and Europe and together these represent current best practice for reporting Ore Reserves and Mineral Resources.
The JORC Code envisages the use of reasonable investment assumptions, including the use of projected long term commodity prices, in calculating reserve estimates. However, during 2003 the US Securities and Exchange Commission indicated that for US reporting, historical price data should be used. Only certain operations are affected by this guidance and resulting changes to reserves are shown on page 147.
Ore Reserve and Mineral Resource information in the tables below is based on information compiled by Competent Persons (as defined by JORC), or recognised overseas mining professionals as defined by the ASX, most of whom are full time employees of Rio Tinto or related companies. Each has had a minimum of five years relevant estimation experience and is a member of a recognised professional body whose members are bound by a professional code of ethics. Each Competent Person consents to the inclusion in this report of information they have provided in the form and context in which it appears. A register of the names of the Competent Persons who are responsible for the estimates is maintained by the company secretaries in London and Melbourne and is available on request.
The ore reserve figures in the following tables are as of 31 December 2003. Summary data for year end 2002 are shown for comparison. Metric units are used throughout. The figures used to calculate Rio Tinto's share of reserves are often more precise than the rounded numbers shown in the tables, hence small differences might result if the calculations are repeated using the tabulated figures.
Ore reserves continued
Mineral resources
As required by the Australian Stock Exchange additional data in relation to mineral resources has been disclosed on pages 22 to 24 of the 2003 Annual report and financial statements but these pages have been intentionally omitted from the 2003 Form 20-F because they conflict with the SEC Industry Guide 7.
Information on Group mines(Rio Tintos interest 100 per cent unless otherwise shown)
Information on Group mines continued
Information on Group smelters, refineries and processing plants
Financial review
Financial risk managementThe Groups policies with regard to risk management are clearly defined and consistently applied. They are a fundamental tenet of the Groups long term strategy. The Groups business is mining and not trading. The Group only sells commodities it has produced. In the long term, natural hedges operate in a number of ways to help protect and stabilise earnings and cash flow, obviating the need to use derivatives or other forms of synthetic hedging for this purpose. Such hedging is therefore undertaken to a strictly limited degree, as described below. The Group has a diverse portfolio of commodities and markets, which have varying responses to the economic cycle. The relationship between commodity prices and the currencies of most of the countries in which the Group operates provides further natural protection. In addition, the Groups policy of borrowing at floating US dollar interest rates helps to counteract the effect of economic and commodity price cycles. The Groups financial statements and disclosures show the full extent of its financial commitments including debt and similar exposures. The Groups share of the net debt of joint ventures and associates is also disclosed. It is not the Groups practice to engineer financial structures as a way of avoiding disclosure. The risk factors to which the Group is subject that are thought to be of particular importance are summarised on page 7. The effectiveness of internal control procedures continues to be a high priority in the Rio Tinto Group. A statement on this is included in Corporate governance on pages 71 and 72. The Groups policies with regard to currencies, commodities, interest rates and treasury management are discussed below.
Adjusted earningsUK Financial Reporting Standard 3 allows presentation of an adjusted measure of earnings. As presented by Rio Tinto, this excludes the effect of exceptional items of such magnitude that their exclusion is necessary in order that adjusted earnings fulfil their purpose of reflecting the Groups underlying performance. Except where otherwise indicated, earnings contributions from business units and business segments exclude the effect of these exceptional items. Adjusted earnings is reconciled with net earnings on page 82.
Group operating performance2003 compared with 2002Adjusted earnings of US$1,382 million were US$148 million below 2002. Including the exceptional items described below, net earnings at US$1,508 million compared with US$651 million reported for 2002. The weakening of the US dollar against the currencies in which most of the Groups costs are denominated reduced earnings by US$412 million. The average levels of the
Australian dollar, Canadian dollar and South African rand were respectively 20 per cent, 11 per cent and 39 per cent stronger in 2003 than in 2002. The effect of these and other currency movements on operating costs was to reduce earnings by US$352 million. The effect of the shift in exchange rates on balance sheet values expressed in the functional currencies of the relevant units further reduced earnings and this charge was US$100 million more than the corresponding charge in 2002. Gains on currency hedges initiated by North, Ashton and Comalco, before they became wholly-owned subsidiaries in 2000, increased earnings by US$40 million relative to 2002. The prices of many products were stronger, increasing earnings by US$442 million. Copper prices averaged 13 per cent higher; gold 17 per cent and aluminium seven per cent. The copper price was 51 per cent higher at the end of the year than at the beginning and this led to a favourable effect from provisional pricing of US$39 million. Benchmark iron ore prices increased by nine per cent. Over the full year, seaborne thermal coal prices were on average seven per cent lower and realised uranium prices were lower due to some higher priced contracts expiring at Rössing. Overall, volume changes increased earnings by US$38 million. Lower gold and molybdenum volumes at Kennecott Utah Copper, as a result of reduced by product grades, partly offset volume growth from new mines at Diavik (diamonds) and West Angelas (iron ore) and capacity expansions at Escondida (copper) and Hamersley (iron ore). The benefit of higher gold grades at Grasberg, particularly in the first half of the year, was negated by lower production following a slippage in the mine in the fourth quarter of the year. Robust demand for diamonds enabled Argyle to reduce inventories. Volumes of titanium dioxide feedstock were affected by weak markets. Turning to costs, higher oil, power and gas prices reduced earnings by US$54 million. Average oil prices were US$3.50 per barrel or 14 per cent higher than in 2002. Gas prices in the US market were also higher and there were also increases in electricity prices, principally in New Zealand. Excluding the effects of energy prices and the US$106 million impact of inflation, cost increases reduced earnings by US$82 million. Two significant events adversely affected cost performance in the period. In the first half of the year, there was a three week smelter shut down at Kennecott Utah Copper as a result of the acid plant failure. The slippage at the Grasberg mine in the fourth quarter impacted both production volumes and costs. Costs at Coal & Allied were affected by higher demurrage caused by a shortage of rail capacity in the Hunter Valley. Lower earnings at Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium included
a charge associated with the partial write down of a customer receivable. Excluding exceptional items, the effective tax rate at 28.8 per cent compares with 31.2 per cent for 2002. The lower charge in 2003 reflects reduced tax payments in the US and a number of one off benefits including a credit of US$8 million resulting from the proposed entry into the Australian tax consolidation regime, with effect from 1 January 2003. The Group continues to benefit from low interest rates thanks to its policy of having predominantly floating rate debt. The after tax net interest charge was US$36 million less than in 2002, due both to lower interest paid and higher capitalised interest. The net central cost of the Groups pension schemes was about US$60 million higher than in 2002. The sale of the Fortaleza nickel mine was completed on 16 January 2004 and the profit on sale will, therefore, be taken up in 2004. However, the net earnings of Rio Tinto Brasil include a credit of US$32 million resulting from the reversal of part of an impairment provision relating to Fortaleza recorded in a previous year. The 2003 exceptional items of US$126 million relate to gains on the disposal of Kaltim Prima Coal, Peak and Alumbrera. No tax was payable on these gains.
2002 compared with 2001 Adjusted earnings of US$1,530 million for 2002 were US$132 million below 2001. After the exceptional charges described below, net earnings at US$651 million compared with US$1,079 million reported for 2001. Changes in selling prices and exchange rates reduced earnings by US$74 million. Average gold prices were 14 per cent higher than in 2001, but aluminium prices averaged eight per cent lower. Average copper prices were slightly down but there was a benefit from provisionally priced copper. Benchmark prices for iron ore and seaborne thermal coal fell. North American domestic coal prices improved with market fundamentals, as the effects of the California energy crisis in early 2001 flowed into contract prices. The negative variance due to exchange rate movements was principally a result of the Australian dollar being stronger relative to the US dollar. Higher volumes increased earnings by US$85 million. Demand for iron ore was extremely strong with Hamersley Iron achieving record production and shipments from the West Angelas mine beginning to ramp up. Diamond sales volumes were also higher than in 2001. There were lower gold volumes from the Groups interest in Grasberg as a result of lower grades, particularly in the first half of the year. Excluding the effect of inflation, changes in costs benefited earnings by US$54 million. However, cost inflation more than offset this benefit, reducing earnings by US$76 million. The interest charge on the Groups debt in 2002 was US$72 million lower than in 2001 although the level of debt did not
change significantly. Other variances reduced earnings by US$193 million compared with 2001. Of this, US$54 million resulted from the gain that was included in 2001 earnings as a result of the disposal of Norzink. There were also adverse variances on other corporate items, including pension costs. Earnings in 2002 suffered from the reduced value of pension fund assets associated with falling stock markets and from a reduction in the expected return on pension fund equity investments compared with that applied in previous years. Excluding exceptional items, the effective tax rate at 31.2 per cent was broadly in line with the previous year. Exceptional charges in 2002 of US$879 million, net of tax and outside shareholder interests, comprised provisions for the write down of asset carrying values of US$763 million and a charge relating to environmental remediation works at Kennecott Utah Copper (KUC) of US$116 million. US$480 million of the asset write downs related to KUC and US$235 million related to the Iron Ore Company of Canada. The increase in the expected cost of environmental remediation resulted from a significant change in the planned methodology for treatment of contaminated groundwater in the vicinity of the Bingham Canyon mine. The 2001 exceptional charge comprised provisions for the write down of asset carrying values.
Cash flow 2003 compared with 2002 The Groups operating cash flow remained strong. Total cash flow from operations of US$3,486 million, including dividends from associates and joint ventures, was only seven per cent below 2002 despite ten per cent lower adjusted earnings. Tax paid includes an amount of US$106 million relating to the disputed tax assessments from the Australian Tax Office described in note 29 of the financial statements. The amount paid has been recorded as a receivable in these accounts because the directors believe that the relevant tax assessments are not sustainable. Investment in the business continued at a high level. Capital expenditure and financial investment of US$1,673 million was US$197 million less than 2002. Purchases of plant and equipment included the expansion of iron ore capacity and the construction of the Comalco Alumina Refinery. Purchases less sales of investments in 2002 of US$323 million mainly related to US Treasury bonds held as security for the deferred consideration on the North Jacobs Ranch acquisition, of which US$76 million were sold in 2003. Rio Tinto continues to explore opportunities to dispose of non core assets but only when such disposals are value creating. The sale of assets, principally Peak, Alumbrera and Kaltim Prima Coal generated a cash inflow of US$405 million.
2002 compared with 2001 Cash from operating activities together with dividends from joint ventures and associates totalled US$3,743 million in 2002, an increase of ten per cent compared with 2001. Tight control of working capital was reflected in reductions in accounts receivable and inventories totalling US$243 million, which largely reversed increases reported in 2001. Net investment in property, plant and equipment of US$1,417 million was at a similar level to that in 2001. The major areas of expansionary investment in 2002 were the Diavik diamond mine, the West Angelas iron ore mine, the Hail Creek coking coal development, Comalcos alumina refinery and the first instalment on the purchase of additional coal reserves at North Jacobs Ranch. Disposals of businesses net of acquisitions generated US$127 million. This largely related to units acquired with Peabodys Australian coal business in 2001, which the Group sold on as planned. Purchases of other investments absorbed a further US$323 million of cash. These investments included US$304 million of US Treasury bonds held as security for the deferred consideration on the North Jacobs Ranch reserves acquired during the period, which is payable over the next four years. Dividends paid were US$145 million higher than 2001 as a result of the change in policy for weighting of interim and final dividends announced in 2001.
Balance sheet Shareholders funds increased by US$2,575 million to US$10,037 million mainly due to profits exceeding dividends by US$626 million and due to exchange rate movements of US$1,924 million. The most significant of these was the strengthening of the Australian dollar by 32 per cent against the US dollar. Net debt reduced by US$101 million to US$5,646 million. The ratio of net debt to total capital improved from 41 per cent, at 31 December 2002, to 34 per cent at 31 December 2003. Interest was covered 11 times. As detailed in note 18 to the Financial statements, US$2,194 million (36 per cent) of the Groups borrowings at the end of 2003 will mature in 2004. Of this, US$1,687 million was commercial paper, mainly raised through markets in the US. Although US$1,100 million of this is backed by bank standby facilities expiring after one year, it is regarded as short term debt under UK accounting rules. Under Australian and US accounting practices, commercial paper backed in this way would be grouped with non current borrowings, and the Group regards it as such in managing the maturity profile of its debt. At the year end, medium and long term borrowings (excluding the above commercial paper), totalled US$3,849 million. The amount issued under the US$3 billion European Medium Term Notes Programme was US$1,618 million of which US$70 million
is repayable within one year. In addition to the above, the Groups share of the third party net debt of joint ventures and associates totalled US$1,004 million at 31 December 2003, as detailed in note 14 to the Financial statements. Save for US$6 million, this debt is without recourse to Rio Tinto.
Liquidity and capital resources Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited continue to enjoy the strong long and short term credit ratings from Moodys and Standard and Poors shown below.
The unified credit status of the Group is maintained through cross guarantees whereby contractual obligations of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited are automatically guaranteed by the other. These ratings continue to provide financial flexibility and consistent access to debt via money or capital markets and enable very competitive terms to be obtained. The Group has access to the following markets for its financing requirements:
During 2003, the Group raised US$462 million in maturities of one to five years via its EMTN programme. In June 2003, the Group issued a US$600 million Global bond. Proceeds of these issues were employed to repay maturing term debt and commercial paper. The Groups commercial paper programmes are fully backed by bank standby facilities which totalled US$2.75 billion at 31 December 2003, of which US$1.1 billion was on terms exceeding one year. These facilities can be drawn upon at any time in the unlikely event of disruption in the commercial paper market. These standby facilities are provided by strongly rated banking counterparties. As at 31 December 2003, the Group had contractual obligations other than short term debt in the form of commercial paper and bank borrowings repayable on demand arising in the ordinary course of business as follows:
(a) Debt obligations exclude commercial paper and bank borrowings repayable on demand (b) Other relates to long term obligations including capital commitments
Financial review continued
On the basis of the levels of obligations described above, the unused capacity under the Groups commercial paper programmes, the Groups anticipated ability to access debt and equity capital markets in the future and the level of anticipated internal cash generation, the directors believe that the Group has sufficient short and long term sources of funding available to meet its liquidity requirements. The Groups committed bank standby facilities contain a financial undertaking that the Groups consolidated income before interest and taxes for any annual accounting period shall not be less than three times consolidated interest payable for such period. The ratio for 2003 is well above this minimum. The Group does not have any financial agreements that would be affected to any material extent by a reduction in the Groups credit rating. The Groups policy is to centralise and minimise surplus cash balances whenever possible. The majority of cash balances are held in jurisdictions without exchange controls.
Exchange rates, reporting currencies and currency exposure Rio Tintos assets, earnings and cash flows are influenced by a wide variety of currencies due to the geographic diversity of the Groups sales and the countries in which it operates. The US dollar, however, is the currency in which the great majority of the Groups sales are denominated. Operating costs are influenced by the currencies of those countries where the Groups mines and processing plants are located and also by those currencies in which the costs of imported equipment and services are determined. The Australian and US dollars are the most important currencies influencing costs. In any particular year, currency fluctuations may have a significant impact on Rio Tintos financial results. A weakening of the US dollar against the currencies in which the Groups costs are determined has an adverse effect on Rio Tintos net earnings. The approximate effects on the Groups net earnings of ten per cent movements from the 2003 full year average exchange rates of the currencies having most impact on costs are as follows:
These sensitivities are based on 2003 prices, costs and volumes and assume that all other variables remain constant. They take into account the effect of hedges maturing in 2004, as disclosed in note 28 to the Financial statements. These exchange rate sensitivities include the effect on operating costs of movements in exchange rates but exclude
the impact through revaluation of foreign currency working capital. They should therefore be used with care. In the case of the Australian dollar, there is a significant degree of natural protection against cyclical fluctuations, in that the currency tends to be weak, reducing costs in US dollar terms, when commodity prices are low, and vice versa. Given the dominant role of the US currency in the Groups affairs, the US dollar is the currency in which financial performance is measured and in which financial results are presented both internally and externally. It is also the natural currency for borrowing and holding surplus cash. Modest amounts of cash are held in other currencies for short term operational reasons. The Group finances its operations primarily in US dollars, either directly or using currency swaps, and a significant proportion of the Groups US dollar debt is located in subsidiaries having functional currencies other than the US dollar. Exchange gains and losses relating to US dollar debt impact on the profit and loss accounts of such subsidiaries. However, such exchange gains and losses are excluded from the Groups profit and loss account on consolidation with a corresponding adjustment directly to reserves. This means that financing in US dollars impacts in a consistent manner on the Groups consolidated accounts irrespective of the functional currency of the particular subsidiary where the debt is located. Under US generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the above exchange differences must be charged against the profit for the year except to the extent that the US dollar debt is effective as a hedge of assets accounted for in US dollars in the particular companies in which the debt resides. This gives rise to an adjustment in the US GAAP reconciliation for 2003, increasing US GAAP earnings by US$623 million net of tax and outside shareholders interests; but no adjustment to US GAAP shareholders funds is required. The Group does not generally believe that active currency hedging would provide long term benefits to shareholders. Currency protection measures may be deemed appropriate in specific commercial circumstances and are subject to strict limits laid down by the Rio Tinto board. As set out in note 28 to the Financial statements, as at 31 December 2003 there were forward contracts, including synthetic forwards, to purchase A$1,459 million, C$18 million and NZ$875 million in respect of future trading transactions. From the Groups perspective, these forward contracts offset the impact of exchange rate variations on a portion of the local currency costs incurred by various subsidiaries. Much of the above hedge book was acquired with North Limited. North held a substantial hedge book on acquisition, which has been retained but is not being renewed as maturities occur. The Group has also entered into forward
currency contracts in respect of certain capital commitments. As at 31 December 2003, it held contracts to purchase A$393 million in respect of future committed capital expenditure.
Interest rates Rio Tintos interest rate management policy is generally to borrow and invest cash at floating rates. Short term US dollar rates are normally lower than long term rates, resulting in lower interest costs to the Group. Furthermore, cyclical movements of interest rates tend to compensate, to an extent, for those of commodity prices. In some circumstances, an element of fixed rate funding may be considered appropriate. At the end of 2003, only 13 per cent of the Groups net debt was fixed rate. Based on the Groups net debt at 31 December 2003, and with other variables unchanged, the approximate effect on the Groups net earnings of a one percentage point increase in US dollar LIBOR interest rates would be a reduction of US$30 million.
Commodity prices The Groups normal policy is to sell its products at prevailing market prices. Exceptions to this rule are subject to strict limits laid down by the Rio Tinto board and to rigid internal controls. Rio Tintos exposure to commodity prices is diversified by virtue of its broad commodity spread and the Group does not generally believe commodity price hedging would provide long term benefit to shareholders. Metals such as copper and aluminium are generally sold under contract, often long term, at prices determined by reference to prevailing market prices on terminal markets, such as the London Metal Exchange and COMEX in New York, usually at the time of delivery. Prices fluctuate widely in response to changing levels of supply and demand but, in the long run, prices are related to the marginal cost of supply. Gold is also priced in an active market in which prices respond to daily changes in quantities offered and sought. Newly mined gold is only one source of supply; investment and disinvestment can be important elements of supply and demand. Contract prices for many other natural resource products are generally agreed annually or for longer periods with customers, although volume commitments vary by product. Approximately 40 per cent of Rio Tintos 2003 net earnings from operating businesses came from products whose prices were terminal market related and the remainder came from products priced by direct negotiation. The approximate effect on the Groups net earnings of a ten per cent change from the full year average market price in 2003 for the following metals would be:
The above sensitivities are based on 2003 volumes and give the estimated impact on net earnings of changes in prices, assuming that all other variables remain constant. The relationships between currencies and commodity prices is a complex one and movements in exchange rates can cause movements in commodity prices and vice versa. The sensitivities allow for the effect of the commodity hedges maturing in 2004, as disclosed in note 28 to the Financial statements.
Treasury management and financial instrumentsTreasury activities operate as a service to the business of the Rio Tinto Group and not as a profit centre. Strict limits on the size and type of transaction permitted are laid down by the Rio Tinto board and are subject to rigorous internal controls. Corporate funding and overall strategic management of Rio Tintos balance sheet is handled by the London based Group Treasury. Rio Tinto does not acquire or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes; and does not believe that it has exposure to such trading or speculative holdings through its investments in joint ventures and associates. Derivatives are used to separate funding and cash management decisions from currency exposure and interest rate management. The Group uses interest rate swaps in conjunction with longer term funds raised in the capital markets to achieve a floating rate obligation which is consistent with the Groups interest rate policy. Currency swaps are used to convert debt or investments into currencies, primarily the US dollar, which are consistent with the Groups policy on currency exposure management. No material exposure is considered to exist by virtue of the possible non performance of the counterparties to financial instruments held by the Group. The derivative contracts in which the Group is involved are valued for the purposes of the Financial instrument disclosures in the Financial statements by reference to quoted market prices, quotations from independent financial institutions or by discounting expected cash flows.
DividendsDividends paid on Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shares are equalised on a net cash basis; that is without taking into account any associated tax credits. Dividends are determined in US dollars. Rio Tintos progressive dividend policy aims to increase the US dollar value of dividends over time, without cutting them in
economic downturns. Rio Tinto plc shareholders receive dividends in pounds sterling and Rio Tinto Limited shareholders receive dividends in Australian dollars, which are determined by reference to the exchange rates applicable to the US dollar two days prior to the announcement of dividends. Changes in exchange rates could result in a reduced sterling or Australian dollar dividend in a year in which the US dollar value is maintained or increased. For 2002 and subsequently, the policy is that the interim dividend for each year in US dollar terms will be equivalent to 50 per cent of the previous years total US dollar dividends.
Critical accounting policies & estimatesDual listed company reportingAs explained in detail, in the Outline of dual listed companies structure and basis of financial statements, the consolidated financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group deal with the results and assets and liabilities of both of the dual listed companies, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited and their subsidiaries. They are prepared under UK GAAP and satisfy the obligations of Rio Tinto Limited, as laid down by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. This annual report also includes reconciliation statements setting out the effect of the adjustments to net earnings and to shareholders funds for the Group that would be required, under Australian and under US GAAP. The US dollar is the presentation currency used in these financial statements, as it most reliably reflects the Groups global business performance. The treatment of gains and losses on US dollar debt is described above in the section dealing with Exchange rates, reporting currencies and currency exposure.
Ore reserve estimatesRio Tinto estimates its ore reserves and mineral resources based on information compiled by Competent Persons as defined in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves of September 1999 (the JORC code). There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating ore reserves; and assumptions that are valid at the time of estimation may change significantly when new information becomes available. Changes in the forecast prices of commodities, exchange rates, production costs or recovery rates may change the economic status of reserves and may, ultimately, result in the reserves being restated. Such changes in reserves could impact on depreciation rates, asset carrying values and provisions for close down, restoration and environmental costs. The SEC has indicated that, for US reporting, historical price data should be used as a basis for ore reserve estimation. The application of such historical prices has led to reduced ore reserve quantities for US reporting purposes for certain of the Groups
operations. This increased the present value of the provision for close down costs, which increased the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded on implementation of FAS 143 in the US GAAP reconciliation for 2003. It also reduced US GAAP earnings for 2003 by a further US$82 million, largely as a result of higher depreciation charges.
Asset carrying valuesExceptional charges of US$583m in 2001 and US$879m in 2002, net of tax and minority interests, related largely to impairment of the balance sheet carrying values of certain of the Groups businesses. No significant impairment charges occurred in 2003 but it will be necessary to keep under review in each future accounting period whether events or changes in circumstances may necessitate further adjustments to asset carrying values. The carrying values are assessed by reference to the net present values of forecast future cash flows. The cash flows are particularly sensitive to the long term values of two particular parameters: exchange rates and commodity selling prices. Management considers that over time there is a tendency for increases in prices to compensate to some extent for a reduction in the value of the US dollar (and vice versa). But such compensating changes are not synchronised and do not fully offset each other. The great majority of the Groups sales are based on prices denominated in US dollars. To the extent that the US dollar weakens without commodity price offset, cash flows and therefore net present values are reduced. During 2003, the US dollar weakened by 32 per cent against the Australian dollar, by 22 per cent against the Canadian dollar, and 30 per cent against the South African rand. Towards the end of 2003, there were substantial increases in commodity prices, which have continued to rise in early 2004. Rio Tintos cash flow forecasts are based on assessments of expected long term commodity prices derived from analysis of supply and demand for particular products. These assessments often differ from current price levels and are updated periodically. For the majority of Rio Tintos businesses, by both number and by value, the net present value of the expected cash flows, using the most recent assessments, is substantially in excess of the carrying value in the balance sheet. For a minority of the businesses the carrying value is close to the net present value of the cash flows, using the most recent assessments. The effects of exchange rates and commodity price changes on the values of these units relative to their book values are monitored closely.
Environmental obligationsProvision is made for environmental remediation costs when the related environmental disturbance occurs, based on the net present value of estimated future
costs. Where the ultimate cost of environmental disturbance is uncertain, there may be variances from these cost estimates, which could affect future financial results. Close down and restoration costs are a normal consequence of mining, and the majority of close down and restoration expenditure is incurred at the end of the life of the mine. Although the ultimate cost to be incurred is uncertain, subsidiary companies have estimated their respective costs based on feasibility and engineering studies using current restoration standards and techniques.
Post retirements benefitsPost retirement benefits are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Standard Accounting Practice 24, which requires gradual recognition of the surpluses and deficits that emerge as a result of variances from actuarial assumptions. The Accounting Standards Board has extended the transitional period before FRS 17 is required to be implemented. Under FRS 17, all deficits would be recognised in full and surpluses would be recognised to the extent that they are considered recoverable. FRS 17 transitional disclosures are included on pages 125 to 128. If FRS 17 had been applied in drawing up the 2003 financial statements, shareholders funds would have been US$650 million lower, including the impact of the level of stock markets at 31 December 2003, and net earnings would have been US$17 million higher.
Overburden removal costsIn open pit mining operations, it is necessary to remove overburden and other waste materials to access ore from which minerals can economically be extracted. The process of mining overburden and waste materials is referred to as stripping. During the development of a mine, before production commences, it is generally accepted that stripping costs are capitalised as part of the investment in construction of the mine. Stripping of waste materials continues during the production stage of the mine. Some mining companies expense these production stage stripping costs as incurred, while others defer such stripping costs. Those mining companies that expense stripping costs as incurred will report greater volatility in the results of their operations from period to period. Rio Tinto defers stripping costs for those operations where this is the most appropriate basis for matching costs with the related economic benefits, and the effect is material. The relationship between the stripping ratio in the period and that planned for the life of the particular mine is important in determining the amount, if any, of stripping costs that are deferred. The stripping ratio is generally calculated by dividing the tonnage of waste mined by the tonnage of ore mined during the relevant period. In these cases, deferral of stripping costs is not impacted by the reported ore grade. The costs to be
deferred (or accrued) are those relating to the excess (or shortfall) of the current period stripping ratio compared with that projected for the life of the mine. The life of mine stripping ratio is based on the proven and probable reserves of the operation. In operations that experience material fluctuations in the stripping ratio on a year by year basis over the life of the mine, deferral of stripping costs is designed to smooth the cost of stripping allocated to individual reporting periods, generally in relation to the tonnage of ore mined. Stripping costs incurred in the period are deferred to the extent that the stripping ratio exceeds the life of mine stripping ratio. Such deferred costs are then charged against reported profits to the extent that, in subsequent periods, the stripping ratio falls short of the life of mine stripping ratio. In some operations, there are distinct periods of new development during the production stage of the mine. These may, for example, relate to a separate ore body or discrete section of the ore body. The new development will be characterised by a major departure from the life of mine stripping ratio. Excess stripping costs during such periods are deferred and subsequently amortised pro rata, generally to the tonnage of ore mined in the remaining life of the operation. Deferred stripping costs form part of the total investment in the relevant income generating unit, which is reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. During 2003, production stage stripping costs incurred by subsidiaries and equity accounted operations exceeded the amounts charged against pre tax profit by US$109 million. The net book value carried forward in property, plant and equipment and in investments in joint ventures and associated companies at 31 December 2003 was US$671 million. Amortisation of deferred stripping costs is included in depreciation of property, plant and equipment or in the Groups share of the results of its equity accounted operations, as appropriate.
ContingenciesDisclosure is made of material contingent liabilities unless the possibility of any loss arising is considered remote. Disclosure of material contingent assets is made where the inflow of economic benefits is probable. Contingencies are disclosed in note 29 on page 117. These include tax assessments of approximately A$500 million, which, based on Counsels opinion, the Group expects to be successful in challenging.
International financial reporting standardsTo satisfy its reporting obligations in the UK and in Australia, the Group will be drawing up its financial statements for 2005 and subsequent years in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards.
Comparative figuresIn the Operational review section, comparative figures have been restated to reflect the composition of each product group in 2003, as well as a change in the basis of attribution of post retirement costs to business units. These changes are explained in more detail on pages 132 and 133.
Forward looking statementsForward looking statements are contained in this financial review and attention is drawn to the Cautionary statement on pages 7 and 8.
Operational review
Iron Ore group
Iron OreEarnings contributionUS$m
Rio Tintos Iron Ore group wholly owns Hamersley Iron in Western Australia. Hamersley Iron wholly owns five mines and also operates the 60 per cent owned Channar mine, a joint venture with an Australian subsidiary of the China Iron & Steel Industry & Trade Group Corporation. The Iron Ore group also includes Rio Tintos effective 53 per cent interest in Robe River Iron Associates two mines in Western Australia and Rio Tintos 59 per cent interest in the Iron Ore Company of Canada. The Iron Ore group operates both enterprises, which were acquired in 2000. In addition, the Iron Ore group includes the HIsmelt® direct smelting technology developed in Western Australia. At 31 December 2003, the group accounted for 25 per cent of Rio Tintos operating assets, an increase of four per cent over the year. In 2003, the group contributed approximately 18 per cent of the Groups turnover and 36 per cent of adjusted earnings, up two and six per cent respectively on 2002. Adjusted earnings are explained on page 32. Late in the year, Rio Tinto reached agreement with its joint venture partners in Robe River to allow closer cooperation between the Pilbara operations of Hamersley Iron and Robe. Under the agreement, the two companies existing separate structures will continue, with no change to the ownership of Robe or Hamersley Iron or to the ownership of their respective assets. While preserving these structural elements, the agreement allows for continued cooperation and common usage of rail infrastructure; for closer cooperation and common usage of infrastructure areas such as port and power; and for closer cooperation in relation to the management of non infrastructure assets, including mobile and other mining equipment and site and corporate services. New entities will be formed to facilitate the implementation of the agreement. The entities will collectively be referred to as Pilbara Iron. Rio Tinto and the Robe River Joint Venture participants are working towards final documentation of the agreement, and implementation will be subject to obtaining any necessary Government approvals. In January 2004, Hamersley Iron announced iron ore price settlements that increased prices by 18.62 per cent for the contract commencing 1 April 2004. Chris Renwick, chief executive Iron Ore, is based in Perth, Western Australia.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE2003 compared with 2002The Iron Ore groups contribution to 2003 earnings was US$499 million, US$47 million higher than in 2002. Demand for iron ore continued to be extremely strong throughout 2003, particularly from China, where imports of iron ore were
30 per cent higher than 2002. Strong demand for iron and steel in China bolstered demand for iron ore in other markets, with Japan, Korea and Taiwan all at record levels. Price increases reflected the strong market, with a nine per cent increase for 2003 achieved in May. In September Hamersley became aware that China Iron & Steel Industry Trade Group Corporation had entered into a conditional heads of agreement with Lynas Corporation Ltd to dispose of its 40 per cent interest in the Channar Joint Venture in return for cash and shares in Lynas under a transaction which remains incomplete. Hamersley subsequently issued proceedings in the Western Australia Supreme Court to protect confidential joint venture information. Those proceedings are continuing.
2002 compared with 2001The Iron Ore groups contribution to 2002 earnings was US$452 million, US$50 million lower than in 2001. After a relatively slow start, and with considerable uncertainty surrounding the future outlook, the performance of the world iron and steel industry improved markedly throughout 2002. Reflecting the early uncertainty, global iron ore prices declined in 2002 by 2.4 per cent for fines, 5.0 per cent for lump and 5.5 per cent for pellets. However, as demand grew through the year, especially from China, shipments increased quarter by quarter, leading to some delays in loading vessels and consequent demurrage costs towards the end of the year. An exceptional charge of US$235 million relating to the impairment of asset carrying values at IOC was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2002.
Hamersley Iron (Rio Tinto: 100 per cent) Hamersley Irons six mines in Western Australia, 630 kilometre dedicated railway, and port and infrastructure facilities at Dampier are run as one operation. Hamersley Iron employs approximately 2,100 people. In 2003, Hamersley Iron completed option analysis studies to increase its system capacity to ensure its ability to meet the needs of customers and the strong growth in demand for iron ore, particularly in China. As a consequence, in December, Rio Tinto approved projects to expand the Dampier port and the Yandicoogina mine worth a total of US$920 million, with US$200 million of this committed to long lead time capital items. The port expansion will increase Dampiers export capacity from 74 million tonnes per annum to 116 million tonnes per annum. The Yandicoogina mine expansion will increase output to 36 million tonnes per annum from the 24 million tonne per annum capacity it will achieve in 2004. Construction on both projects began in December 2003. Commissioning of the
Operational review continued
36 million tonne Yandicoogina mine expansion is expected in early 2005. Completion of the port expansion is scheduled for late 2005, with progressive commissioning from early 2006. Studies are continuing into providing additional rail, power and other infrastructure to complement the new port and mine requirements. Studies into further new mine capacity to meet future growth in demand are also being advanced. Construction of the US$64 millionEastern Range mine continued on target for a production start in early 2004. Located ten kilometres east of Paraburdoo, the mine will service an unincorporated joint venture between Hamersley Iron and Shanghai Baosteel Group Corporation, Chinas largest iron and steel maker. The joint venture, in which Hamersley Iron holds a 54 per cent equity share, will supply about ten million tonnes of standard Hamersley Iron ore products per year over 20 years.
2003 operating performanceHamersley Irons total production in 2003 was a record 73.4 million tonnes, 5.2 million tonnes more than in 2002. Rio Tintos share of this production was 69.3 million tonnes. Shipments by Hamersley Iron totalled a record 74.3 million tonnes, including sales through joint ventures. Hamersley Irons shipments to China also reached a record level at 33.9 million tonnes, making China by far the single largest destination for Hamersley Iron ore. Production from all mines was stretched to achieve these levels, placing cost and other operating stresses on the Hamersley Iron system. Maintenance programmes were maintained to ensure continued ability to service growing market demand, including the first changeout of the Channar mines 20 kilometre conveyor belt since the mine began production in 1990. The Brockman mine reopened in February 2003, following a major refit to lift capacity to approximately eight million tonnes per year, allowing it to service the adjacent Nammuldi mine. The Pilbara Rail Company, formed in 2002, which effectively integrates the rail networks of Hamersley Iron and Robe River into a single operation, continued to deliver operating savings through rolling stock, track maintenance and operational efficiencies. Further new track was built in 2003 to duplicate a 50 kilometre section of the main line, and additional locomotives and ore cars were commissioned to enhance the overall system capacity. In the spirit of closer cooperation with Robe, Hamersley Iron for the first time shipped product from its Yandicoogina mine through Robes Cape Lambert port facilities in October, increasing operational flexibility and helping to relieve congestion at Dampier. The US$55 million structured cost saving programme begun in 2001 was completed in 2003, but was offset by higher costs incurred
to stretch output. Key sustainable savings achieved included: ongoing operational improvements including benefits realised from Pilbara Rail; continued improvement in labour productivity, including benefits flowing from the consolidation of information technology and accounting resources into a shared services group for Rio Tinto in Western Australia; and savings accrued from a large number of targeted projects including rescheduling of operations, procurement benefits and capital investment. Additional costs arose from the need to ensure competitive remuneration in the Pilbara. Hamersley Iron continued to work sustainable development principles into its daily operations throughout the year, using a modified version of its decision making methodology to enhance stakeholder engagement in the port and Yandicoogina expansion projects. In November 2003, Hamersley Iron also achieved certification under ISO 14001 for its environmental management system. Ore reserves changed in line with delineation drilling to improve confidence, annual extraction and updated mine planning. Ore reserves are now expressed by material type to clarify their likely use.
Hamersley Irons total sales of iron ore to major markets in 2003
Robe River Iron Associates (Rio Tinto: 53 per cent)Robe River Iron Associates (Robe) is an unincorporated joint venture in which Mitsui (33 per cent), Nippon Steel (10.5 per cent) and Sumitomo Metal Industries (3.5 per cent) also have interests. Robe is the worlds fourth largest seaborne trader in iron ore, employing approximately 735 people. The company operates two open pit mining operations in Western Australia. Mesa J is located in the Robe Valley, north of the town of Pannawonica. The mine produces Robe River fines and lump, which are pisolitic iron ore products. The West Angelas mine, opened in 2002, is located approximately 100 kilometres west of the town of Newman. The mine produces West Angelas fines and lump, which are Marra Mamba iron ore products. The mine schedule for West Angelas production capacity is being accelerated. Mine production reached an annualised rate of 18 million tonnes per year in December 2003, and West Angelas is on schedule to reach its original design rate of 20 million tonnes per year by the end of the first quarter of 2004, two years earlier than planned. This
will increase Robes production capacity to a nominal 50 million tonnes per year. In 2003, Robe obtained approval to expand West Angelas to 25 million tonnes per year. Work is scheduled to begin on the US$105 million expansion in early 2004 and is expected to be complete by mid 2005. Robe uses a dedicated rail system, operated by Pilbara Rail, to transport ore from its mines to the companys deepwater port facilities at Cape Lambert for export. Robe exports under medium and long term supply contracts with major integrated steel mill customers in Japan, Europe, South Korea and China.
2003 operating performanceRobes total production in 2003 was a record 45.1 million tonnes, comprising 32 million tonnes from Pannawonica, and 13.1 million tonnes from West Angelas. Total sales were 43.9 million tonnes, with strong demand for Robe products in all major markets. Sales included 31.1 million tonnes from Pannawonica and 12.8 million tonnes of West Angelas. Sales growth was based on increased West Angelas tonnage availability, and focused primarily on Japan, where all customers exercised their tonnage options. Further penetration of the Chinese market was also achieved. Increased marketing effort in China resulted in the signing of long term agreements with large steel mill customers. The mine development schedule for West Angelas has been accelerated in response to high customer demand. The business met the challenges presented by the accelerated West Angelas production schedule, along with the introduction of new processes at the port and business improvement activities occurring at all sites. At both Pannawonica and West Angelas increased focus was placed on waste stripping and improved equipment availability. This year improved business planning processes were introduced to ensure effective communication and coordination between the sites. Robes safety performance continued to improve, with sustained use of behaviour based safety tools such as peer observations and hazard identifications. Increased priority has been placed on prompt reporting and investigation of near misses.
Robes total sales of iron ore to major markets in 2003
Iron Ore Company of Canada (Rio Tinto: 58.7 per cent) Following a capital restructuring, Rio Tintos interest in Iron Ore Company of Canada (IOC) increased from 56.1 per cent to 58.7 per
cent in December 2002. Mitsubishi (26.2 per cent) and the Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Income Fund (15.1 per cent) are also shareholders in IOC, Canadas largest iron ore pellet producer. IOC operates an open pit mine, concentrator and pellet plant at Labrador City, Newfoundland, together with a 420 kilometre railway to port facilities and the partially refurbished pellet plant at Sept-Iles, Quebec. Products are transported on IOCs Quebec North Shore and Labrador Railway to Sept-Iles. The port is open all year and handles ore carriers of up to 255,000 tonnes. IOC exports its concentrate and pellet products to major North American, European and Asia Pacific steel makers. The Sept-Iles pellet plant remains closed, following the suspension in September 2001 of the US$240 million refurbishment project. IOC employs approximately 1,900 people and in April 1999, signed a five year agreement with the United Steelworkers of America. This is due for renegotiation at the end of February 2004.
2003 operating performanceThe year was another challenging one for IOC. Difficult market conditions continued in North America as the steel industry there continued to restructure. Despite this, pellet sales volumes reached a record high through increased sales to existing customers in Europe and the Asia/Pacific. Pellet production returned to 2001 levels, well above 2002. However, IOC experienced operational difficulties, particularly with the commissioning of the control system on its ATO (Automatic Train Operation) system in the first half. This lead to a shortfall in planned concentrate production for the year. During 2003, IOC maintained its focus on the cost reduction programme that commenced in 2002 and workforce reductions continued as planned under the accelerated retirement programme. IOC also made gains in improving the reliability of key production systems, positioning it for 2004. Emphasis on improved safety performance continues.
IRON ORE GROUP PROJECTS HIsmelt® (Rio Tinto: 60 per cent) Construction began in January 2003 on a HIsmelt® plant at Kwinana in Western Australia. The HIsmelt® process is a revolutionary direct iron smelting technology developed largely by Rio Tinto that will convert iron ore fines into high quality pig iron (96 per cent iron content) without the use of coke ovens and sinter plants. Notably, the
technology allows efficient processing of ore fines with higher levels of impurities, the current market for which is limited using standard blast furnace technology and operating techniques. The HIsmelt® project at Kwinana is a joint venture between Rio Tinto (60 per cent interest through its subsidiary, HIsmelt® Corporation), US steelmaker Nucor Corporation (25 per cent), Mitsubishi Corporation (ten per cent), and Chinese steel maker Shougang Corporation (five per cent). The plant will have a production capability of 800,000 tonnes per year and the project is on budget and on schedule to commence production at the end of 2004. In 2003, HIsmelt® signed a process licence agreement with the Laiwu Steel Group Ltd. of China to allow for the development of an iron making facility using HIsmelt® technology.
Energy group
EnergyEarnings contributionUS$m
Note: 2003 and 2002exclude exceptional items
Rio Tinto Energy groups coal interests are in Australia and the US. They supply internationally traded and domestic US and Australian markets. Following the disposal of Rio Tintos coal interest in Colombia in early 2000, acquisitions in late 2000 and early 2001 enhanced the existing interests in New South Wales, Australia. During 2003, Rio Tintos 50 per cent interest in Kaltim Prima Coal was sold to an Indonesian company. The group also includes Rössing in Namibia and Energy Resources of Australia. Both companies supply uranium oxide for use in electricity generation. In 2003, Rio Tinto formed a single management organisation to manage the Energy groups coal assets in Australia. Rio Tinto and Coal & Allied Industries (Rio Tinto 75.7 per cent) agreed to combine Coal & Allied corporate and service functions with those of Pacific Coal to increase efficiencies and lower costs. Pacific Coal (Rio Tinto 100 per cent) was renamed Rio Tinto Coal Australia (RTCA). Effective 1 February 2004, RTCA will manage both Pacific Coals existing assets and Coal & Allieds assets in the Hunter Valley in a centralised management structure which provides for shared costs. At 31 December 2003, the Energy group accounted for 14 per cent of Group operating assets and, in 2003, contributed 20 per cent of Rio Tintos turnover and 11 per cent of adjusted earnings. Adjusted earnings are explained on page 32. Preston Chiaro, chief executive Energy, is based in London.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 2003compared with 2002The Energy groups 2003 contribution to earnings was US$157 million, US$196 million lower than in 2002. In Indonesia, earnings from Kaltim Prima Coal up to the time of its sale to Indonesian interests in October were US$31 million.
2002 compared with 2001The Energy groups earnings contribution in 2002 at US$353 million was US$20 million lower than in 2001. A strengthening Australian dollar and higher costs associated with flooding and high wall instability at Cordero Rojo were the main components of the lower result.
Kennecott Energy (Rio Tinto: 100 per cent) Kennecott Energy (KEC) wholly owns and operates four open cut coal mines in the Powder River Basin of Montana and Wyoming, US and has a 50 per cent interest in, but does not operate, the Decker mine in Montana. KEC also manages the Groups interest in Colowyo Coal LP in Colorado, US and in total employs approximately 1,700 people. One of the largest US producers, KEC sells to electricity generators predominantly in mid-western and southern states. Sales are made under multiple year contracts and on a spot basis for one year or less. The domestic US market for low sulphur coal continues to grow due to its competitive
cost per delivered energy unit and restrictions on sulphur emissions by utilities. In the longer term, continued strong demand for low sulphur coal is projected following the announcement of construction of new coal fired generating capacity in the US.
2003 operating performanceKECs attributable production of 108 million tonnes of coal was three per cent higher than in 2002 as a result of higher demand for Antelope and Jacobs Ranch coals, partially offset by lower production at Cordero Rojo and Colowyo. Geotechnical instability at Cordero Rojo resulted in a change in mining methods that reduced production whilst Colowyo reduced production in line with market demand. Earnings of US$88 million were slightly lower than 2002 earnings of US$90 million. This decrease represents higher volumes that were offset by higher costs to mine at Cordero Rojo and higher fuel prices. In November 2003, KEC streamlined administrative staffing among its five operating mines and its headquarters office to improve the efficiency of operations. KEC demonstrated a considerably better safety performance in 2003, with a 39 per cent improvement in the lost time injury frequency rate.
Rio Tinto Coal Australia (RTCA)(Rio Tinto: 100 per cent)RTCA, formerly Pacific Coal, manages the Groups Australian coal interests. These comprise Blair Athol (Rio Tinto 71 per cent), Kestrel (Rio Tinto 80 per cent), Tarong (Rio Tinto 100 per cent) and Hail Creek coal mines (Rio Tinto 92 per cent) and the Clermont deposit (Rio Tinto 50 per cent). Effective 1 February 2004, RTCA will also provide management services to Coal & Allied for day to day operation of its four mines. Around 60 per cent of Blair Athol thermal coal is sold under contracts extending to 2010 to its two Japanese joint venture partners. The rest is sold by long term and annual agreements to European and Southeast Asian customers. Production from the wholly owned Tarong mine is sold to Tarong Energy Corporation, an adjacent State owned power utility. A ten year contract for up to seven million tonnes annually expires in 2011. Kestrel is an underground mine where thermal and metallurgical coal production recommenced in June 1999. Sales to customers in Japan, south east Asia, Europe and Central America are generally on annual agreements. Construction of the 5.5 million tonnes per annum Hail Creek metallurgical coal project is essentially complete. Development of the project in central Queensland commenced in 2001 and the mine was officially opened on 5 November 2003. Production of high quality metallurgical coal commenced in July 2003 with commercial shipments beginning in October. Market acceptance has been strong in all markets, particularly China. RTCA employs some 1,052 people (including regular contractors).
2003 operating performanceRTCAs earnings of US$70 million were 48 per cent lower than in 2002 due to the unfavourable exchange rate movement and lower thermal coal prices. Export prices were down seven per cent and domestic prices down 25 per cent. There were also increased costs at Kestrel and Tarong. Production at Blair Athol increased from 11.8 million tonnes to 12.5 million tonnes while sales were 12.6 million. Kestrels production decreased by 19 per cent to 3.3 million tonnes while shipments of 3.7 million tonnes of coking and thermal coal were in line with 2002. Production in 2003 was impacted by poorer mining conditions in the last longwall panels in the 200 series mining area. Mining from the new Ti Tree area, predominantly coking quality coal, commenced in January 2004. At Tarong, production increased to 6.5 million tonnes in line with increased demand at Tarong Energy Corporation. Hail Creek production commenced in July 2003. Production and sales were 0.9 million tonnes of which 0.7 million tonnes were shipped. In late 2002, Hail Creek commenced the recruitment of its operating employees. The 16 former employees retrenched from Blair Athol in 1997 applied but were unsuccessful in gaining employment at Hail Creek. The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) successfully applied to the Australian Industrial Relations Commission for an Exceptional Matters Order that requires Hail Creek to grant preferential employment to the former employees unless the company is able to satisfy the Commission that the employees are not suitable. The company has challenged the order before the Federal Court of Australia. The hearing is scheduled for February 2004. Until this challenge is determined, Hail Creek must comply with the order. The improved safety performance of 2002 was not sustained. Safety performance during 2003 returned to the levels of 2001.
Coal & Allied Industries(Rio Tinto: 75.7 per cent)Coal & Allied Industries (Coal & Allied) is publicly listed on the Australian Stock Exchange and had a market capitalisation of A$2.0 billion (US$1.5 billion) at 31 December 2003. In 2003, Coal & Allied, through a committee of independent directors, negotiated an agreement with Rio Tinto to combine Coal & Allieds corporate and management functions with those of Rio Tinto Coal Australia. The combined management organisation reduces costs, achieves economies of scale and removes duplicated functions for both Coal & Allied and Rio Tinto. Coal & Allieds assets are all located within the Hunter Valley in New South Wales, Australia. It wholly owns Hunter Valley Operations, has an 80 per cent interest in Mount Thorley Operations and a 55.57 per cent interest in the contiguous Warkworth mine, and a 40 per cent interest in the Bengalla mine which abuts its wholly owned Mount Pleasant development project. Coal &
Allied also has a 37 per cent interest in Port Waratah Coal Services. Coal & Allied produces thermal and semi soft coal. Most of its thermal coal is sold under contracts to electrical or industrial customers in Japan, Korea and elsewhere in Asia. The balance is sold in Europe and in Australia. Coal & Allieds semi soft coal is exported to steel producing customers in Asia and Europe under a combination of long term contracts and spot business.
2003 operating performanceA loss of US$24 million was incurred as a result of the stronger Australian dollar, lower coal prices and increased demurrage costs, compared with earnings of US$68 million in 2002. Good progress was made in implementing operational cost reductions including the agreement to combine corporate and management functions with those of RTCA in order to improve performance in 2004 and beyond. Rio Tintos share of coal production was 15.4 million tonnes, a reduction of 13 per cent on 2002, principally resulting from divestments in 2002 and operational changes in 2003 to reduce saleable production to align with market conditions. Abnormal vessel queues at the port of Newcastle and rail congestion in the Hunter Valley rail system increased demurrage costs. Coal & Allied is working with the other parties to increase the productivity of the logistical chains in the Hunter Valley. However, congestion remains an issue for 2004. Agreement was reached with the joint venture partners at Mount Thorley and Warkworth to integrate operations to improve efficiencies and reduce costs. Workforce agreements were agreed at Warkworth, Mount Thorley and Hunter Valley operations in late 2003.
Rössing Uranium (Rio Tinto: 68.6 per cent) Rössing produces and exports uranium oxide from Namibia to European, US and Asia Pacific electricity producers. Production has been lower than the 4,500 tonnes per year capacity for some years due to market conditions. Rössing employs approximately 800 people.
2003 operating performanceTotal production of 2,401 tonnes of uranium oxide was lower than 2002 as a result of a shutdown at the start of the year to install a new tailings conveyor system. Expiring long term higher priced sales contracts were replaced by contracts in line with 2003 market prices. These lower realised prices combined with the strengthening of the Namibian dollar against the US dollar resulted in a loss of US$19 million compared with a US$23 million profit in 2002. Initiatives to deliver cost savings continued. Plans to extend the current open pit for production beyond 2007 were suspended. In 2003, Rössings safety performance continued to improve with a 41 per cent reduction in the lost time injury frequency rate.
Energy Resources of Australia(Rio Tinto: 68.4 per cent)Energy Resources of Australia Ltd (ERA) is publicly listed and had a market capitalisation of A$0.6 billion (US$0.5 billion) at31 December 2003. ERA employs approximately 240 people with 12 per cent of the operational workforce represented by Aboriginal people. ERA produces uranium oxide at the Ranger open pit mine, 260 kilometres east of Darwin in the Northern Territory. ERA also has title to the nearby Jabiluka mineral lease, which in 2003 was put on long term care and maintenance. Ranger has a 5,500 tonnes per year capacity and began production in 1981. Estimated ore reserves are sufficient for more than eight years at current mining rates. ERAs operations including Jabiluka have been progressively surrounded by, but remain separate from, the World Heritage listed Kakadu National Park and especially stringent environmental requirements and governmental oversight apply. ERA in 2003 was certified under ISO 14001 for its environment management system. Uranium oxide from Ranger is sold to base load electricity utilities in Japan, Korea, Europe and North America.
2003 operating performanceUranium oxide production totalling5,134 tonnes was higher than the previous year in response to greater sales commitments. Stronger prices were offset by the strengthening Australian dollar and resulted in earnings of US$11 million, a reduction of US$1 million from 2002. Safety performance for 2003 deteriorated against 2002 in terms of lost time injuries.
ENERGY GROUP PROJECTSClermont Coal (Rio Tinto: 50 per cent)The Clermont deposit is near RTCAs Blair Athol mine. It is suited to open cut development. A prefeasibility study of the project was completed in 2003. A feasibility study is planned to commence in 2004. Integration options with Blair Athol are available following the signing of a strategic alliance agreement by the Blair Athol and Clermont Joint Ventures. JPower (EPDC) joined the Clermont Joint Venture after acquiring a 15 per cent interest from Rio Tinto and Mitsubishi.
Mount Pleasant (Rio Tinto: 75.7 per cent) Development of the Mount Pleasant project continued with a prefeasibility study being undertaken in 2002 and further optimisation work in 2003.
Industrial Minerals group
Rio Tintos Industrial Minerals group produces borates, industrial salt, talc and titanium dioxide feedstock. Rio Tinto Borax, Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium, Luzenacs talc operations and Dampier Salt, its principal businesses, are leading suppliers of their products. The Industrial Minerals group employed approximately 7,000 people in 2003. At 31 December 2003, the Industrial Minerals group accounted for 13 per cent of the Groups operating assets and contributed approximately 15 per cent of Rio Tintos turnover and 11 per cent of adjusted earnings in 2003. Adjusted earnings are explained on page 32. Tom Albanese, chief executive Industrial Minerals, is based in London.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE2003 compared with 2002Industrial Minerals contribution to 2003 earnings was US$154 million, 46 per cent lower than in 2002, reflecting the significant weakening of the US dollar against both the Canadian dollar and South African rand and continued weakness across North American and European markets. Rio Tinto Borax earnings were eight per cent lower at US$80 million. The cost base was negatively impacted by higher natural gas and diesel prices, rising employee benefit costs in California and net one off charges. Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium earnings at US$47 million were 71 per cent lower than in 2002 due to the effect of the weak US dollar, soft market conditions and a charge associated with the writedown of a customer receivable in 2003.
2002 compared with 2001Industrial Minerals contribution to earnings in 2002 was US$286 million, 11 per cent lower than in 2001, reflecting weaker market conditions and reduced pension credits. Rio Tinto Boraxs 2002 earnings were 15 per cent lower at US$87 million. Cost improvements were more than offset by reduced pension credits on lower market returns and a higher effective tax rate. Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium (RIT) earnings at US$161 million in 2002 were 11 per cent lower than in 2001 due both to market conditions and the effect of reduced pigment demand in 2001.
Rio Tinto Borax (Rio Tinto: 100 per cent)Rio Tinto Boraxs Boron mine in Californias Mojave Desert is the worlds largest borate mine. Borates are used in the US for vitreous applications, such as fibreglass, glass wool, high temperature glasses and enamels. The perborate industry, a major market in Europe, uses borates as bleach in detergents. Other uses include ceramics, fertilisers, flame retardants, wood preservatives and corrosion inhibitors. Rio Tinto Boraxs US and UK research laboratories provide technical support and participate in collaborative projects with customers.
2003 operating performanceNet earnings from Rio Tinto Borax at US$80 million were eight per cent below the previous year. Production of borates was six per cent higher than 2002 at 559,000 tonnes. Sales were four per cent higher than 2002, due to the combined impact of euro denominated sales and volume growth in the North American and Asian markets. The cost base was affected by higher natural gas and diesel prices, rising employee benefit costs in California and net one off charges. An expansion of boric acid capacity at Boron was announced in 2003 and is scheduled to come on stream in 2005 to meet rising global demand for boric acid.
Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium(Rio Tinto: 100 per cent)Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium (RIT) comprises the wholly owned QIT-Fer et Titane (QIT) in Quebec, Canada and the 50 per cent interest in Richards Bay Minerals (RBM) in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Both produce titanium dioxide feedstock used by customers to manufacture pigments for paints and surface coatings, plastics and paper, as well as iron and zircon co-products. QITs proprietary process technology enables it to supply both the sulphate and chloride pigment manufacturing methods. Its upgraded slag (UGS) plant supplies the growing chloride sector and is designed for expansion in line with demand up to a capacity of 600,000 tonnes per year from its current level of 250,000 tonnes. During 2003, RIT announced an expansion of its UGS plant to 325,000 tonnes per annum, with new production scheduled to commence by early 2005. RBMs ilmenite has a low alkali content which makes its feedstock suitable for the chloride pigment process. RBM can sustain one million tonnes of feedstock production annually.
2003 operating performanceEarnings from Rio Tinto Iron & Titanium (RIT) of US$47 million were 71 per cent lower than in 2002. The weakening US dollar had a significant adverse effect on the result, as did the combined impact of the absence of a one off benefit in 2002 and a charge associated with the write down of a customer receivable in 2003. Titanium dioxide pigment demand decreased slightly in 2003. The titanium dioxide feedstock side of the industry continued to be affected by the oversupply of conventional grade chloride feedstocks and persistent high feedstock inventory levels at some pigment producers. In contrast, demand for very high grade feedstock products, such as UGS, remains strong. Overall, RIT shipments of titanium dioxide feedstocks were lower in 2003, reflecting both market conditions and the effect of new capacity in the market. Production at both QIT and RBM was curtailed accordingly.
Demand for iron and steel co-products improved during 2003, with increased demand and higher prices. Zircon markets continued to tighten, with demand from China being particularly strong.
Dampier Salt (Rio Tinto: 64.9 per cent)Dampier Salt (DSL), now the worlds largest salt exporter, produces industrial salt by solar evaporation at Dampier, Port Hedland and Lake MacLeod, and also mines gypsum at Lake MacLeod, in Western Australia. The chemical industry in Asia is the principal customer for DSLs salt whilst gypsums main use is in wallboard and cement manufacture.
2003 operating performanceDampier Salts earnings were US$10 million in 2003, 58 per cent lower than 2002. While shipments of salt and gypsum increased by four and 13 per cent respectively, margins were severely eroded by the rise of the Australian dollar, the extremely tight freight market and excess salt supply capacity. Salt production was in line with 2002, at 7.1 million tonnes (Rio Tinto share: 4.6 million tonnes). A new process plant at Dampier was approved to reduce costs and improve product quality. Construction should be complete by the end of 2004.
Luzenac Group (Rio Tinto: 99.9 per cent)The Luzenac Group operates talc mines, including the worlds largest in south west France, and processing facilities in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Spain, the UK and the US. Luzenac products are used internationally. Principal uses are in paper, paints, cosmetics, ceramics, agricultural and plastics industries.
2003 operating performanceEarnings in 2003 at US$17 million were 21 per cent higher than the previous year. Luzenacs production in 2003 was two per cent higher than 2002 at 1.36 million tonnes. Sales volumes were maintained from 2002, while improvements in pricing were partially offset by the effect of the sales mix. The key paper and polymer markets remained weak in 2003 on both sides of the Atlantic, while Asia continued to demonstrate strong volume growth. There was continued rationalisation of operating and service sites, which contributed a number of one off redundancy and restructuring charges.
INDUSTRIAL MINERALS GROUPPROJECTSQIT Madagascar Minerals(Rio Tinto: 80 per cent)RIT manages QIT Madagascar Minerals (QMM), in which an agency of the Government of Madagascar has a 20 per cent interest. QMM was formed to evaluate and, if appropriate, develop large mineral sand deposits in the south east of Madagascar. In November 2001, QMM was granted an environmental permit by the Government for the proposed minerals sands project. The permit requires QMM to comply with a full range of social and environmental obligations throughout the life of a project. A feasibility study is progressing and RIT is working with the Government, as well as all other interested and affected parties, with a view to developing the project.
Rio Colorado Potash (Rio Tinto: Option to acquire 100 per cent)In 2003, Rio Tinto entered into an option agreement to acquire 100 per cent of Potasio Rio Colorado SA, an Argentine company holding the mineral rights and other assets of the Rio Colorado potash project. The project is located 1,000 kilometres south west of Buenos Aires, in the provinces of Mendoza and Neuquen. The option runs until late 2005, during which time Rio Tinto will evaluate the commercial potential for developing the project.
Aluminiumgroup
Rio Tinto AluminiumEarnings contributionUS$m
Rio Tintos Aluminium group encompasses its wholly owned, integrated aluminium subsidiary, Comalco and its 51 per cent share in Anglesey Aluminium. Rio Tinto acquired the publicly held 27.6 per cent of Comalco in 2000. Management responsibility for Anglesey Aluminium was transferred from the Copper group to Aluminium in June 2003. At 31 December 2003, the Aluminium group accounted for 21 per cent of Rio Tintos operating assets and in 2003 contributed 16 per cent of Group turnover and 14 per cent of adjusted earnings. Adjusted earnings are explained on page 32. Sam Walsh, chief executive Aluminium, is based in Brisbane, Queensland.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE2003 compared with 2002Rio Tinto Aluminiums contribution to 2003 earnings was US$200 million, a decrease of 22 per cent. Stronger aluminium prices increased earnings by US$51 million with the average three month price in 2003 at 65 US cents per pound compared with 61 US cents per pound in 2002. The effect of the weakening US currency reduced Rio Tinto Aluminiums earnings by US$111 million.
2002 compared with 2001 Rio Tinto Aluminiums contribution to 2002 earnings was US$256 million, a decrease of 22 per cent from 2001. Lower prices reduced earnings by US$44 million with the average three month aluminium price in 2002 at 61 US cents per pound compared with 66 US cents in 2001. The strengthening Australian and New Zealand currencies reduced Rio Tinto Aluminiums earnings by US$13 million.
Rio Tinto Aluminium (Rio Tinto: 100 per cent) Rio Tinto Aluminium is a major supplier of bauxite, alumina and primary aluminium to world markets. It employs some 4,200 people. Rio Tinto Aluminium has a large, wholly owned bauxite mine on Cape York Peninsula, Queensland. Approximately 90 per cent of the bauxite from Weipa is shipped to alumina refineries at Gladstone, Queensland and Sardinia, Italy. It is also entitled to four per cent of bauxite output from the Boké mine, Guinea, West Africa. Rio Tinto Aluminium has a 56.2 per cent consortium interest in Eurallumina and increased its interest in Queensland Alumina Limited (QAL) from 30.3 to 38.6 per cent for US$189 million in September 2001. In January 2002, construction of a wholly owned, US$750 million alumina refinery commenced. The Comalco Alumina Refinery will produce 1.4 million tonnes of alumina annually at Gladstone, Queensland. In 2003, Comalco signed a long term alumina supply agreement with Norsk Hydro, the Norwegian industrial group, to initially supply 300,000 tonnes of alumina in 2005
and then 500,000 tonnes of alumina per year for more than 20 years to Hydro Aluminiums smelters in Australia and elsewhere. The alumina will be sourced from QAL and the new Comalco Alumina Refinery at Gladstone. In July 2002, Comalco completed the acquisition of an additional 9.5 per cent of lines 1 & 2 at Boyne Island smelter for US$78.5 million. This increased Comalcos overall ownership of the Boyne Island smelter from 54.2 per cent to 59.4 per cent. In addition to the Boyne Island smelter, smelters at Bell Bay (100 per cent) in Tasmania, Tiwai Point (79.4 per cent) in New Zealand and Anglesey Aluminium (51 per cent) in Wales, produce Rio Tinto Aluminiums primary aluminium.
2003 operating performance Bauxite production at Weipa was 11.9 million tonnes, six per cent higher than in 2002. This was due to improved performance and to facilitate a build in inventory in advance of the requirement to supply the Comalco Alumina Refinery which will be commissioned during the second half of 2004. Weipa bauxite shipments at 11.4 million tonnes increased slightly compared with 2002 levels. QAL production was four per cent above 2002 due largely to record process flows notwithstanding the adverse impacts of external power outages in both years. Eurallumina production increased marginally over 2002 levels. At Gladstone in Australia, drought conditions continued into 2003 with all operations continuing to achieve the required 25 per cent cutback in water use with no interruption to production. All operations have voluntarily retained these reduced water levels despite restrictions being lifted due to abundant rainfall in the local catchment. Rio Tinto Aluminiums share of aluminium production from its four smelters at 818,000 tonnes was 23,000 tonnes above 2002 production. This includes the first full year of the additional share of the Boyne Island smelter that was purchased in 2002. These figures also take into account production at the Anglesey Aluminium smelter for both years. Production at the Tiwai Point smelter was constrained by high spot electricity prices in New Zealand in the first half of 2003. This was more than offset by record production in the second half of the year following the resumption of spot electricity purchases in June 2003. Production at Bell Bay and Anglesey Aluminium was marginally higher than in 2002. Attributable metal shipments of 820,000 tonnes went to similar destinations as 2002, being primarily Japan, Australia, Europe and Korea.
ALUMINIUM GROUP PROJECTSComalco Alumina Refinery (Rio Tinto: 100 per cent)Following approval in October 2001 and ground work preparation in December, large scale construction of the US$750 million first stage of a new greenfield alumina refinery at Gladstone began in January 2002. The refinery will enable Rio Tinto Aluminium to add further value to the Weipa bauxite deposit and strengthen both Rio Tinto Aluminiums and Australias positions in the world alumina market. The majority of the refinerys output will go into Rio Tinto Aluminium smelters. The balance will be placed in the traded alumina market. Rio Tinto Aluminium will, however, become a more significant player in the traded alumina market after the 1.4 million tonnes per year refinery comes into production. During 2003, work continued on schedule and within budget with engineering design work concluded and construction 58 per cent complete by year end. First production is due in the fourth quarter of 2004, with initial shipments in the first quarter of 2005 and full capacity by the end of 2006. There is potential for the refinery capacity to increase to over four million tonnes per year when market conditions allow.
Weipa mine expansion (Rio Tinto: 100 per cent)A US$150 million expansion of the Weipa bauxite operation was started in 2003 to increase output of beneficiated bauxite to 16.5 million tonnes per year. The increase in production will help meet the demands of the new Comalco Alumina Refinery. The majority of the expenditure is on a 9.5 million tonne beneficiation plant to allow mining of lower grade fine ores. The NeWeipa expansion project is due for completion in 2004.
Copper group
Note: 2003, 2002 and 2001 excludeexceptional items
Rio Tintos Copper group comprises Kennecott Utah Copper in the US and interests in the copper mines of Escondida in Chile, Grasberg in Indonesia, Neves Corvo in Portugal, Northparkes in Australia and Palabora in South Africa. The group also includes the Zinkgruvan zinc mine in Sweden, Kennecott Minerals in the US and Rio Tinto Brasil as well as Kennecott Land. In 2003, Rio Tinto divested its interests in the Alumbrera and Peak Gold mines for US$210 million. At 31 December 2003, the Copper group, which produces gold as a significant co-product, accounted for 21 per cent of the Groups operating assets and, in 2003, contributed approximately 23 per cent of Rio Tintos turnover, of which 55 per cent was from copper and the remainder mostly from gold. It accounted for 32 per cent of adjusted earnings in 2003. Adjusted earnings are explained on page 32. Oscar Groeneveld, chief executive Copper, is based in London.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE2003 compared with 2002 The Copper groups contribution to earnings was US$440 million, US$99 million higher than in 2002. The average price of copper was 80 US cents per pound compared to71 US cents in 2002. The average gold price of US$363 per ounce increased by 17 per cent. Kennecott Utah Coppers contribution to earnings of US$88 million was broadly in line with 2002. Earnings at Escondida increased to US$122 million despite constrained output in response to weak market demand. Mined production of copper was up 32 per cent (Rio Tinto share) due to the commissioning of the new Laguna Seca concentrator. Freeports earnings contribution decreased by US$5 million to US$127 million chiefly as a result of the slippage in October. This had an adverse effect on both volumes and costs. In the fourth quarter, lower grade material was mined from the open pit and near term mine operations are being directed to accelerating the removal of waste material to ensure the restoration of safe access to the higher grade areas. Despite full production from the underground mine, mill throughput was significantly below capacity. Earnings at Palabora decreased to US$1 million in 2003 due to the negative effect of the stronger rand in relation to the US dollar combined with lower volumes and higher costs resulting from delays in reaching capacity in the underground mine.
2002 compared with 2001 The Copper groups contribution to earnings in 2002 was US$341 million, US$35 million higher than in 2001. The average price of copper was 71 US cents per pound compared to 72 US cents in 2001. The average gold price of US$309 per ounce increased by 14 per cent.
Kennecott Utah Coppers contribution to earnings of US$86 million in 2002 was broadly in line with 2001. Adjusted earnings exclude the effect of exceptional charges relating to asset write downs and a provision for environmental remediation. A downward revision to the Groups long term copper price assumption resulted in an exceptional charge of US$480 million relating to the impairment of asset carrying values. KUC has been investigating the treatment of contaminated groundwater in the vicinity of Bingham Canyon since before 1989, when Rio Tinto acquired the business. As a result of changes to the treatment plan, an additional provision of US$116 million was raised during 2002. This provision relates to costs to be incurred over a number of years. Earnings at Escondida in 2002 decreased 22 per cent to US$32 million as output was constrained in response to weak market demand. Freeports earnings contribution in 2002 increased by US$40 million to US$132 million as a result of higher copper grades and recoveries and higher gold prices, partly offset by lower gold volumes. Earnings at Palabora decreased marginally to US$12 million in 2002. The positive effect of the weaker rand was more than offset by lower volumes and higher costs as the operation moved from the open pit to the underground.
Kennecott Utah Copper (Rio Tinto: 100 per cent)Kennecott Utah Copper (KUC) operates the Bingham Canyon mine, Copperton concentrator and Garfield smelter complex, near Salt Lake City, US. KUC supplies more than ten per cent of annual US refined copper requirements and employs approximately 1,400 people. Negotiation of a new labour agreement, to last until September 2009, was concluded in June. The new agreement provides for greater flexibility in deployment of personnel and assignment of work. Options for the extension of open pit mining beyond the current pit plan of 2013 are under active investigation. Mining and milling at Barneys Canyon ended in 2001 but gold production continues until 2005. The operation employs about 20 people. KUC, as the owner of 53 per cent of the undeveloped land in the Salt Lake Valley of Utah, has formed Kennecott Land to develop about 16,000 hectares of the 37,200 hectares owned. The initial 1,800 hectare Daybreak project site lies in the path of expanding residential areas. Kennecott Land has the right to build roads, make utility connections and prepare the land for sale to builders who will construct houses for 30,000 people. Rio Tinto is initially investing US$50 million with revenues expected to start in 2004.
2003 operating performance Earnings of US$88 million were US$2 million above 2002. Higher copper, gold and molybdenum prices more than offset lower by product grades even though these resulted in lower gold and molybdenum volumes. By product grades will return to life of mine averages in 2005. Refined copper production was 21 per cent lower than in 2002. Production in the first half of the year was adversely affected by a failure in the final absorption tower of the acid plant which stopped smelter production for three weeks. Smelter efficiency was affected throughout the year by the processing of lower grade concentrate with lower copper to sulphur ratios. The negotiation of a new labour agreement was concluded in June 2003. The new agreement has increased flexibility for personnel and work assignments. Work practice changes at the mine, together with the implementation of 12 hour shifts has resulted in 12 haul trucks being stood down and a 20 per cent improvement in truck productivity. The new agreement will enable changes to further increase the efficiency of operations.
Grasberg(Rio Tinto: 40 per cent of joint venture plus 12 per cent of the balance through its interest in FCX) Grasberg, in Papua, Indonesia, is one of the worlds largest copper and gold mines in terms of reserves and production. It is owned and operated by Freeport Indonesia (PTFI), the principal and 91 per cent owned subsidiary of the US based Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold (FCX). Rio Tinto has a 13 per cent direct interest in FCX. At least one per cent of Grasbergs net sales revenues has been committed to support village based programmes. In addition, two new trust funds were
established in 2001 in recognition of the traditional land rights of the local Amungme and Komoro tribes. In 2003, PTFI contributed US$18 million (net of Rio Tinto portion) and Rio Tinto US$4 million in total to the funds. As a result of training and educational programmes, Papuans represented more than a quarter of PTFIs approximately 9,000 workforce by the end of 2003.
2003 operating performance In October a slippage of approximately two million tonnes of saturated partially consolidated rock occurred in the Grasberg open pit, tragically killing eight employees. This was followed by a debris flow of 200,000 tonnes of similar material in December. These occurrences resulted in disruption of ore production and the deferral into late 2004 and 2005 of a portion of metal previously forecast to be produced in the fourth quarter of 2003 and the first quarter of 2004. Detailed planning is in progress to resume full production as soon as it is safe to do so. The disruptions resulted in lower copper production than 2002 but due to significantly higher gold grades, gold production exceeded 2002 by eight per cent. Rio Tintos overall share of copper production decreased by 24 per cent to 193,000 tonnes, but for gold increased by six per cent to 1,076,000 ounces. Production from the DOZ (deep ore zone) achieved design capacity of 25,000 tonnes per day in the third quarter of 2002, one year earlier than anticipated, and has exceeded capacity since then. Expansion of production to more than 35,000 tonnes per day was achieved in the first quarter of 2003, and during the year exceeded 40,000 tonnes per day. A further expansion is under study.
Escondida(Rio Tinto: 30 per cent) The Escondida copper mine in Chile is the largest copper mine in the world, with a mine life expected to exceed 30 years at current rates of production. The mine is 57.5 per cent owned and managed by BHP Billiton. Work on the US$1.0 billion Phase 4 expansion project was completed in 2002, increasing annual production capacity by an average of 400,000 tonnes. Production in 2003 was projected to be 1.2 million tonnes of copper, of which 1.05 million tonnes would have been in concentrate. In response to market conditions, however, a decision to process lower grade
ore from November 2001 until the third quarter of 2002 curtailed copper output by approximately ten per cent. A further curtailment of 200,000 tonnes of copper in 2003 was announced in late 2002. Full production was resumed from the beginning of 2004. The Escondida oxide plant was expanded by eight per cent to 150,000 tonnes of copper per year capacity from March 2001. Approval was given in 2003 for the US$400 million Escondida Norte project. The satellite deposit will provide mill feed to maintain capacity at Escondida above 1.2 million tonnes per annum of copper. First production from Norte is expected in the fourth quarter of 2005. Rio Tintos share of the project cost is US$120 million. Escondida employs approximately 2,400 people.
2003 Operating performanceMobile equipment performance improved in the latter part of the year. Slow settling of sediment in water in the tailings dam caused production restrictions in the Phase 4 project but this is being progressively resolved. The Phase 4 project achieved an average throughput of 85,200 tonnes of ore per day in 2003. Copper production in 2003 was 36 per cent higher than in 2002 due to Phase 4.
Palabora(Rio Tinto: 49.2 per cent) Palabora Mining Company (Palabora) is publicly quoted with a market capitalisation of two billion rand (US$299 million) at 31 December 2003. Rio Tinto acquired an additional 0.7 per cent interest in Palabora through the market in July 2001. Palabora has developed a US$460 million underground mine with a planned production rate of 30,000 tonnes per day of ore. Approximately 1.6 million tonnes of copper are expected to be produced over its 20 year life. In July, Palabora proceeded with a rights offer of debentures which successfully raised approximately US$115 million to service existing debt commitments and allow for completion of the underground project. Palabora supplies most of South Africas copper needs and exports the balance. It employs approximately 2,000 people and labour agreements are negotiated annually.
2003 operating performance Mining of the open pit ceased in 2002 apart from recovery of ore from the ramps that continued until November 2003. This supplemented concentrator feed as the underground mine ramped up production. The ramp up was hindered by poor performance of remote rock breaking equipment. The target production rate of 30,000 tonnes per day was achieved on several occasions during the fourth quarter and there is confidence of achieving design capacity on an ongoing basis. The aggregate impact of the limited production from the underground mine, the strength of the rand against the US dollar, partly offset by cost saving actions, reduced earnings and led to additional borrowing requirements.
Northparkes(Rio Tinto: 80 per cent)Rio Tintos interest in the Northparkes copper gold mine resulted from the acquisition of North. Northparkes is a joint venture with the Sumitomo Group (20 per cent). Following an initial open pit operation at Northparkes in central New South Wales, Australia, underground block cave mining began in 1997. With present and future developments, the operation has a life of about 14 years at current production rates. The copper concentrate produced is shipped to smelters in Japan (67 per cent), Australia (14 per cent) and other countries (19 per cent). Northparkes employs approximately 160 people.
2003 operating performance Production from the Lift 1 block cave ceased in early 2003 and is being replaced by the Lift 2 block cave which is scheduled to commence production in 2004. Progress with mine development for Lift 2 has been hampered by high rock stresses which adversely affected mine development but will assist in the caving of the orebody with good fragmentation. Costs were higher than projected.
Neves Corvo (Rio Tinto: 49 per cent) Sociedade Minera de Neves-Corvo (Somincor) owns and operates the high grade Neves Corvo copper and tin mine in Portugal. The process begun, in 2002, to sell Rio Tintos interest continued in 2003.
2003 operating performance Programmes to improve operational efficiency continued to reduce costs. Employee numbers have decreased from 1,000 at the beginning of 2002 to 830 at the end of the year. Copper production was similar to last year.
OTHER MINERALSZinkgruvan(Rio Tinto: 100 per cent) Rio Tintos ownership of the Zinkgruvan underground zinc, lead and silver mine resulted from the acquisition of North. Zinkgruvan is located in south central Sweden and employs approximately 300 people. The mine has been in continuous production for 140 years. It produces a high quality zinc concentrate as well as a lead and silver concentrate which are sold to European smelters.
2003 operating performanceThe difficulties experienced with introducing paste backfill into the mine in 2002 were overcome and the backlog of stope filling was steadily reduced. Production of zinc and lead in 2003 were 34 per cent and 29 per cent higher than in 2002 due to increased mill throughput and head grades.
Kennecott Minerals (Rio Tinto: 100 per cent)Kennecott Minerals, in the US, manages the Greens Creek mine (Rio Tinto: 70 per cent) in Alaska and the Rawhide mine (Rio Tinto:
51 per cent) in Nevada. It also holds the Groups interest in Cortez/Pipeline (Rio Tinto: 40 per cent), also in Nevada. At Cortez Hills a significant new gold discovery in 2003 will add several million ounces of new reserves to the mine life. Ore extraction from Rawhide was completed in October 2002 and reclamation work has started. Processing of stockpiles will continue. At the former Flambeau, Wisconsin, copper mine, monitoring continues following the 1999 rehabilitation and replanting programme. In 2002, an agreement was reached for the reclaimed Ridgeway, South Carolina, gold mine to be used for environmental education and research. Kennecott Minerals employs approximately 300 people.
2003 operating performance Overall gold production decreased by one per cent due to declining grades at the Cortez/Pipeline gold mine and reduced throughput at Rawhide. Net earnings of US$60 million were US$22 million above 2002, benefiting from higher gold prices.
Greens Creek (Rio Tinto: 70 per cent) In addition to gold, the Kennecott Greens Creek mine on Admiralty Island in Alaska, produces silver, zinc and lead.
2003 operating performance Mill throughput was seven per cent higher than in 2002, but due to lower grades, silver and zinc production was approximately the same as in 2002.
Rio Tinto Brasil (Rio Tinto: 100 per cent) Rio Tinto Brasil manages the Morro do Ouro gold mine (Rio Tinto 51 per cent) and the Corumbá iron ore operation. The wholly owned Fortaleza nickel complex was sold at the end of the year.
Morro do Ouro (Rio Tinto: 51 per cent) At the Morro do Ouro mine in the state of Minas Gerais, a feasibility study is under way to expand gold production to 320,000 ounces per year in 2007 by increasing mill throughput. Morro do Ouro employs approximately 570 people, most of them from the nearby town of Paracatu.
2003 operating performance Gold production was 11 per cent lower due to lower head grades while throughput was similar.
Fortaleza(Rio Tinto: 100 per cent) Rio Tinto Brasil agreed the sale of Fortaleza nickel mine and smelter in the State of Minas Gerais to a Brazilian mining company at the end of the year. The final consideration, which is dependent on the forward nickel price, is expected to be at least US$90 million.
Corumbá(Rio Tinto: 100 per cent) Rio Tinto Brasil owns the Groups interest in Mineração Corumbaense Reunida (Corumbá). Corumbás iron ore is barged along the Paraguay River to South American and European customers.
2003 operating performance Production of lump ore was 25 per cent higher than in 2002.
COPPER GROUP PROJECTS Resolution(Rio Tinto: 55 per cent earn-in) The Resolution project is situated in Arizona, US, in the area of the depleted Magma copper mine. In 2001, an agreement was signed with BHP Billiton Base Metals which allows Rio Tinto to earn a 55 per cent interest in the Resolution project by spending US$25 million over six years. In 2003, five deep exploration drillholes intersected significant copper mineralisation, indicating a large deposit at depth. Rio Tinto anticipates earning its 55 per cent interest in the project in early 2004. The project is currently in the preliminary stages of a pre-feasibility study. It is anticipated that studies will take some considerable time.
Diamonds group
Diamonds
DiamondsEarnings contribution US$m
With diamonds growing into a major product for Rio Tinto, the Diamonds group was formed in 2003 from the former Diamonds & Gold group. It comprises Rio Tintos diamond interests in Australia, Canada and Zimbabwe, and diamond sales offices in Belgium and India. Rio Tinto is a leading proponent of the Kimberley Process which seeks to ensure that only legitimately mined and traded rough diamonds are introduced into the world market. At 31 December 2003, Diamonds accounted for eight per cent of the Groups operating assets and, in 2003, contributed five per cent of Rio Tintos turnover and eight per cent of adjusted earnings. Adjusted earnings are explained on page 32. Keith Johnson, Group executive, Diamonds, is based in London.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE2003 compared with 2002 Diamonds contributed US$113 million to earnings, up US$50 million from 2002, assisted by the start of production from the Diavik mine. The comparative figures are restated to reflect the reorganisation in 2003 of product group responsibilities, with gold and other metal production accounted for under the Copper, Exploration and Technology groups. Demand for rough diamonds was strong throughout the year with the rough market outperforming the market for polished stones.
2002 compared with 2001 Diamonds in 2002 contributed US$63 million to earnings, up US$5 million from 2001.
Diavik Diamonds (Rio Tinto: 60 per cent) Diavik Diamond Mines Inc. (DDMI) owns Rio Tintos interest in and manages the unincorporated Diavik Diamonds joint venture in the Northwest Territories of Canada. The project was completed well ahead of schedule and within budget. Initial production of gem quality diamonds commenced in January 2003 with commissioning of the process plant. DDMIs commitment to work with aboriginal communities was formally concluded in five participation agreements, providing training, employment and business opportunities. Procurement contracts for the operating phase were negotiated with Aboriginal businesses. An agency relationship between DDMI and Rio Tinto Diamonds for marketing DDMIs share of diamond production was concluded in 2002.
2003 operating performance Net earnings were US$41 million. Initial sales of diamonds attracted a high level of interest with prices being achieved at a significantly higher level than originally projected. The mine was completed in January 2003 ahead of schedule and within budget. By year end, the process plant was operating
at design throughput of 1.5 million tonnes of ore per year, six months ahead of schedule. Grades increased as mining progressed through the transition zone where lake bed material meets the orebody proper. Results from bulk sampling of the second kimberlite in the mining sequence, the A154North, showed the quality of these diamonds to be much higher than originally assumed. A strategic planning team separate from mine operations has been set up to look at how best to capture the upside of higher than expected grades in both the A154South and A154North kimberlites. Timing options are being studied for going underground at these pipes and for construction of the A418 dike required to mine the third kimberlite in the mine sequence. This work will be completed over the next 12 months. Diavik includes some of the most valuable kimberlites known in the western world.
Argyle Diamonds (Rio Tinto: 100 per cent) Rio Tinto owns and operates the Argyle diamond mine in Western Australia. Production from Argyles major resource, the AK1 open pit mine, is expected to continue until 2007. Approval has been given for a feasibility study into underground mining. This will lead to a decision, expected in 2005, relating to mine closure or further mine development. Development of an exploration decline commenced in 2003 to assist in confirming design criteria. The range of statutory approvals required for underground operation includes environmental and social impact assessments. Argyle employs approximately 725 people. A decision was taken at the Merlin diamond mine in Australia to cease operations due to the depletion of economic resources. Rehabilitation work was completed at the end of 2003.
2003 operating performance Net earnings of US$72 million were US$9 million above 2002. Argyles results benefited from accumulated inventory sales. Diamond production for 2003 was down eight per cent on 2002 with 30.9 million carats produced. Performance was marred by a fatality in May. Significant production in 2003 was from the lower grade Northern domain of the AK1 pit. Alluvial mining was suspended in 2002.
Rio Tinto Zimbabwe (Rio Tinto: 56 per cent) Rio Tinto Zimbabwe is a publicly quoted company having a significant local shareholding. Its interests include the Renco gold mine and the Empress Nickel refinery and a 50 per cent interest in the Murowa project. The Patchway gold mine was sold in July 2003. In total, Rio Tinto Zimbabwe employs approximately 1,600 people.
2003 operating performance Gold production was down at Renco due to lower throughput and poor head grades.
Operating in Zimbabwe became much more of a challenge during 2003 with multiple factors affecting the operations, the most serious of which were acute food and fuel shortages, and the incidence of HIV. An uncertain fiscal exchange policy also created a very difficult operating environment.
DIAMOND PROJECT Murowa(Rio Tinto: 78 per cent) Rio Tinto and Rio Tinto Zimbabwe propose to approve expenditure of US$10 million on a small scale plant to start diamond production at Murowa near Zvishavane in southern Zimbabwe in 2004. An updated feasibility study confirmed the existence of three kimberlite pipes representing a mining reserve of 18.7 million tonnes of ore at a grade of 0.9 carats per tonne. Initial operations will focus on 1.3 million tonnes of weathered material containing 140,000 tonnes of enriched ore which will be mined first. The small scale approach reduces the initial investment required and will allow confirmation of marketing and regulatory arrangements prior to expansion, which could be considered within three years. Diamonds from Murowa will be marketed through Rio Tinto Diamonds in Antwerp. Safeguards are in place regarding chain of custody of the product. Zimbabwe is a signatory of the Kimberley Process. The development affirms a long standing commitment to Zimbabwe and will make a small contribution towards the economic development of the country.
Exploration group
Rio Tinto Exploration seeks to discover or identify mineral resources that will contribute to the growth of the Rio Tinto Group. The discovery of new resources is essential to replace deposits as they are mined and to help meet the increasing global demand for minerals and metals. The Exploration group is opportunistic in approach and its resources are deployed on projects that show the best chance of delivering a world class deposit to Rio Tinto. Mineral exploration is a high risk activity. Rio Tintos statistics show that an average of only one in 350 mineral prospects that are drill tested result in a mine for the Group. Rio Tinto believes in having a critical mass of projects, selected through a rigorous process of prioritisation. The Exploration group is organised into four geographically based teams and a fifth team that looks for industrial minerals on a global basis. Additionally, a small focused project generation team covers the world for new opportunities. At the end of 2003, Rio Tinto was exploring in 30 countries for a broad range of commodities including copper, diamonds, nickel, industrial minerals, gold, bauxite, iron ore and coal. Exploration employs 189 geologists and geophysicists around the world and has a total staff of 670 people. David Klingner, head of Exploration, is based in London.
2003 operating performance Exploration in 2003 focused on advancing the most promising targets across the spectrum of grassroots, generative, drill test stage, and near mine programmes. Good results were obtained from a number of locations. In the US, a resource of greater than one billion tonnes of about 1.5 per cent copper was outlined at the Resolution project in Arizona. The project was turned over to the Copper group for further evaluation at the start of 2003. Work continued on the delineation of the sizeable body of gold mineralisation discovered at Dashkasan, near Hamadan in Iran. Drilling continued to outline additional resource and to increase confidence in existing resources. Metallurgical test work continued and community and environmental baseline studies were initiated. The potential of the high grade haematite resources at Simandou in Guinea were confirmed at more than one billion tonnes. A convention was signed with the Government of Guinea, which covers the conditions attached to the future possible development of the deposit. Environmental baseline studies continued in partnership with Conservation International. An order of magnitude study will be completed in 2004. Closely spaced drilling was undertaken at the La Sampala nickel laterite resource in Indonesia to test continuity and confirm grade. Metallurgical work and environmental and community baseline studies commenced
with the intention of commencing an order of magnitude study in 2004. Exploration for nickel in the Upper Peninsular of Michigan in the US resulted in the discovery of a small high grade nickel copper deposit at Eagle. A resource of five million tonnes grading 3.6 per cent nickel, three per cent copper with platinum group metal and gold credits is inferred. Studies are underway to assess mining and processing options, environmental impacts and community benefits. In Mozambique, more detailed evaluation work in 2003 has led to a 30 per cent increase in the resource base to some 160 million tonnes of ilmenite. The deposits occur near to the coast, are amenable to conventional dredging methods and have a low slimes content. Although extensions to the previously discovered gold mineralisation at Çöpler in Turkey and to the copper mineralisation at Marcona in Peru were intersected, neither resource is likely to meet Rio Tinto criteria for size and mine life. Çöpler was divested and Marcona is for sale. Diamond exploration continued in Canada, southern Africa, Brazil and India. New diamond bearing kimberlite pipes were discovered in a number of locations and follow up test work is in progress to gauge economic potential. Copper exploration continued in Turkey, Peru, Chile, Argentina and the southwest US. Significant copper mineralisation was encountered in drilling in projects in Turkey, Peru and Argentina, which warrant further follow up drill testing. The Exploration group was active in the search for industrial mineral deposits in various parts of the world including North and South America, Europe and Turkey. The Exploration group continued to support brownfield work at a number of Rio Tinto operations. Exploration in the vicinity of the Argyle diamond deposit continued. In the US and Argentina, active programmes were conducted in the orbit of the Boron and Tincalayu mines. In Indonesia, exploration in and around the Grasberg mine led to the addition of further copper reserves. Safety performance declined in 2003, with 18 injuries compared with 15 in 2002. Lost time injuries, however, decreased from six in 2002 to five in 2003. There were no significant environmental or community incidents during 2003.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE2003 compared with 2002 Cash expenditure on exploration in 2003 was US$130 million and the pre tax charge to earnings was US$127 million, similar to the corresponding figures for 2002.
2002 compared with 2001 Cash expenditure on exploration in 2002 was US$124 million and the pre tax charge to earnings was US$130 million.
OTHER OPERATIONS Kelian (Rio Tinto: 90 per cent)Kelian Equatorial Mining (Kelian) operates an open pit gold mine in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. It is the largest of Rio Tintos primary gold mines. Kelian is required to offer for sale up to 51 per cent of its equity to Indonesian interests according to a specific schedule under the terms of its Contract of Work with the Indonesian Government. Kelians offer to sell 41 per cent in 2003 was again not taken up. Mining at Kelian ceased in 2003 with production from stockpiled ore planned to be completed in early 2005. A mine closure consultative process was completed in 2003 with stakeholders agreeing on the key mine closure directions. Major decisions have been made regarding classification of the mining area as protected forest after closure, the upgrade of the Namuk Tailings dam, environmental criteria, alluvial mining to sterilise the future wetlands area and the use of site assets. Kelian employs approximately 1,800 people including 45 expatriates and 1,300 contractors. A two year collective agreement, was renegotiated in July 2003 and will cover activities through to completion of operations.
2003 operating performanceRio Tintos share of Kelians production was 422,000 ounces in 2003, 13 per cent below 2002 with lower grades more than offsetting the seven per cent increase in throughput.
Bougainville Copper(Rio Tinto: 53.6 per cent)Bougainville Copper (BCL) is a Papua New Guinea company listed on the Australian Stock Exchange with a market capitalisation of A$96 million (US$72 million) at 31 December 2003. Operations at BCLs Panguna mine on Bougainville Island were suspended in 1989 following periods of disruption resulting from civil unrest. At 31 December 1991, a full provision of US$195 million was made in Rio Tintos financial statements for its investment in BCL. Peace has been restored on most of Bougainville Island. However, the mine site is still under the control of elements that deny access to the area. An agreement has been signed between the National Government and Bougainville leaders providing for increased autonomy for Bougainville. Towards the end of 2000, two class actions, since consolidated, were filed in the US District Court in California claiming unspecified damages against Rio Tinto arising out of the mining operation at Panguna and the civil unrest leading to and following mine closure. The Court dismissed the claims. An appeal was heard during 2003 but the decision has been postponed until another case which does not involve Rio Tinto, involving some common legal issues, is heard by the Supreme Court.
The appeal decision is not expected before mid 2004. BCL is not a party to this action. Rio Tinto believes the claims are wholly without merit and the action is being contested vigorously. The Papua New Guinea Internal Revenue Commission has issued assessments claiming additional tax and penalties of approximately US$10 million arising from an audit of BCLs accounts covering the years 1990 to 2001. BCLs tax returns for those and all other years were prepared on BCLs considered view of the appropriate tax law. BCL believes its view is correct and has lodged objections to the assessments.
Technology group
The Technology group provides technical assistance to Rio Tintos product groups and their businesses, and advises executive management. In support of the drive towards operational excellence a key focus is to identify and implement best practices, to improve safety and environmental performance, maximise operating efficiency and add value across Rio Tinto. Technology staff includes experienced professionals covering all the main industry related disciplines, while the Office of the Chief Technologist manages the Groups involvement in external and collaborative research. The total staff in the Technology group at year end was 350 compared with some 260 in 2002. The increase was mainly to provide information technology (IT) services to Western Australia business units through Rio Tinto Shared Business Services and provided the basis for reduction of business unit IT staff. John OReilly, head of Technology, is based in London.
2003 operating performance Technical ServicesTechnical Services increased its involvement with Rio Tinto operations and also continued to provide significant contributions at non managed operations. Activity over the year was again at record levels, with Group wide initiatives launched in 2002, particularly water management, having increasing effect. An initiative aimed at improving metallurgical performance is focussing initially on copper ore processing operations. With a number of projects in the commissioning phase and others under study that involve large scale underground mining, resources in this area have been strengthened, as has expertise in risk management. A number of the current development projects are linked with external research programmes in order to leverage value for Rio Tinto. Others are focussed on innovation and best practice in key areas to add value in a shorter time frame.
Office of the Chief TechnologistThe Office of the Chief Technologist is responsible for the identification and the transfer of technology based opportunities for the Group. The external research portfolio continues to support a broad range of industry related initiatives. The project on in situ barrier technology included some site trials during 2003 which gave encouraging results. Work is continuing in areas such as the use of microwaves in ore comminution and in bulk underground mining technologies. The Rio Tinto Foundation for aSustainable Minerals Industry approved 32 projects for funding.
Technical Evaluation and Project ManagementTechnical Evaluation continued in its principal role of providing independent review of all
major investment proposals being considered by the Group. The unit also continued with the programme of post investment reviews, and has established a database system to consolidate the findings so that lessons learned from completed projects can be shared within the Group. The Project Management unit provides ongoing support to major project teams across Rio Tinto, both for projects in execution and those still in the feasibility stage. There was also continued involvement with some major projects at non managed operations. In addition, the scope of the unit was expanded during the year to include the secondment of resources into project teams, earlier involvement in major project studies, and support to more modest capital projects of high value. A shared role with Technical Services during the year focused on improving the performance of current and future Rio Tinto underground bulk mining projects.
Asset UtilisationThis unit is now well established and its workload continued to expand, adding value across all product groups. Current areas of focus include process control, operational readiness, warranty management, and the formulation and implementation of maintenance standards and audits. There is an emphasis on ensuring that safety, operability and maintainability issues are fully addressed and incorporated into any new designs or retrofits.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCEThe charge for the Technology group against net earnings was US$16 million. The comparable figure for 2002 was US$12 million. The increase was mainly due to the weaker US dollar, sponsored research, and activities of the Foundation for a Sustainable Minerals Industry.
OTHER OPERATIONS Lihir (Rio Tinto: 14.5 per cent)Lihir Gold is a publicly quoted company formed to finance and develop the Lihir mine in Papua New Guinea. Rio Tinto did not participate in an equity placement in November in which 140 million shares were issued to raise US$150 million, resulting in Rio Tintos interest being reduced to 14.5 per cent from 16.3 per cent. Lihir Gold at31 December 2003, had a market capitalisation of A$1.9 billion (US$1.4 million). Lihir directly employs approximately 1,000 people, of whom 91 per cent are Papua New Guineans including 38 per cent Lihirians. Some 1,200 are also employed as contractors of whom a large proportion is Lihirian.
2003 operating performanceGold production at Lihir was nine per cent lower than in 2002 due to lower head grades and below budget mine and plant performance.
Society and environment
Group employees(average for year)
Principal employee locations 2003
The way we work Rio Tinto is in business to create shareholder value by finding and developing world class mineral deposits and operating and eventually closing the Groups operations safely, responsibly and efficiently. To do so, the Group takes a disciplined and integrated approach to the economic, social and environmental aspects of all its activities. The approach is through implementation of the policies described in The way we work the Groups statement of business practice, at all levels of the business. The statement, redistributed in 2003 in 18 languages, is the result of many months wide internal and external consultation and discussion and represents shared values from around the Group. The document was published initially in January 1998 and revised in light of experience in 2002, following further review and consultation, external benchmarking of policies against the best practice of other organisations and approval by the Rio Tinto board. The way we work commits the Group to transparency consistent with normal commercial confidentiality, corporate
accountability and the application of appropriate standards and internal controls. It sets the basis for how Group employees work and also provides guidance for joint venture partners and others. Every employee is responsible for implementing the policies in the document. Rio Tinto has adopted the Association of British Insurers 2003 disclosure guidelines on social responsibility in preparing this report. Details of the Groups overall and individual businesses social and environmental performance continue to be published on the Rio Tinto website: www.riotinto.com
Board responsibilitiesThe directors of Rio Tinto, and of Group companies, are responsible for monitoring adherence to the Group policies outlined inThe way we work. Assurance for performance in these areas involves checking, reviewing and reporting each businesss implementation of the policies, their compliance with regulations and voluntary commitments, and the effectiveness of management and control systems, while also providing mechanisms for improvement. As discussed in the section on Corporate governance on page 70, the board established a process for identifying, evaluating and managing the significant risks faced by the Group. Directors meet regularly, have regular scheduled discussions on aspects of the Groups strategy and full and timely access to the information required to discharge their responsibilities fully and effectively. Rio Tintos Compliance guidance requires that the identification of risk be systematic and ongoing. It recommends that each Group company should undertake a structured risk profiling exercise to identify, categorise and weigh the risks it faces in the conduct of its business unless its board is confident that all relevant and material risks have already been identified in a similar exercise. Each Group company should put systems in place to ensure that risks are reviewed at an appropriate frequency and that its board and management are made aware of changes in the risk profile. Total remuneration is related to performance through the use of annual bonuses, long term incentives and stretching targets for personal, financial and safety performance. Environmental performance parameters are also included. The boards Committee on social and environmental accountability reviews the effectiveness of policies and procedures. The committee comprises four non executive directors and is chaired by the chairman of the main board. It meets three times annually with the chief executive and heads of Technology, Health, Safety and Environment and Communication and Sustainable Development. Reports for the committee summarise significant matters identified through
Rio Tintos assurance activities. These include reviews every four years of each business to identify and manage strategic risks in relation to health, safety, the environment and community; audits against Rio Tinto standards; annual risk management audits; risk reviews for specific concerns, such as cyanide management and smelter operations; procedures and systems for reporting critical and significant issues and incidents; completion of annual internal control questionnaires by all Group business unit leaders covering financial, social, health and safety and environment matters; and findings and recommendations of the independent external assurance and data verification programme.
Policies, programmes and performanceImplementation of the policies in The way we work is discussed in the following sections. Known risks arising from social and environmental matters and their management in Group businesses are described in the relevant Group operations section.
SafetySafety is a core value and a major priority. Rio Tinto believes that all injuries are preventable and its goal is zero injuries. To achieve this, full and consistent implementation of and accountability for Rio Tintos comprehensive standards, guidelines, systems and procedures is required across the world. The Group is also building a supportive safety culture that requires visible leadership, ongoing education and training and a high level of participation by everyone in the workplace. However, there is still some way to go in achieving the goal. In 2003, regrettably, there were six deaths at Rio Tinto operations; three were Group employees and three were contractors. There were 468 lost time injuries during the year. This equates to a rate of 0.81 lost time injuries per 200,000 hours worked (2002: 0.85). Fines for infringement of safety and occupational health regulations involved 12 operations and totalled US$162,000 (2002: 12 operations and US$80,000). This includes a fine of $A206,250 paid by Northparkes in relation to an underground collapse that resulted in four fatalities in November 1999. This event occurred under the previous owner and prior to any Rio Tinto involvement in Northparkes.
Occupational healthRio Tinto strives to protect physical health and wellbeing in the workplace. This requires clear standards, consistent implementation, transfer of best practice and improvement through Group wide reporting and tracking of remedial actions. During 2003, business units worked to implement the occupational health standards and full implementation is targeted for the end of 2004. Setting quantitative occupational health targets to drive performance improvement
has also been a focus during 2003. Business units are developing and implementing action plans to achieve the targets, consistent with implementation of the standards. In 2003, there were 341 new cases of occupational disease, equating to a rate of 107 new cases per 10,000 employees (2002: 120).
EnvironmentWherever possible, Rio Tinto prevents, or otherwise minimises, mitigates and remediates, harmful effects of the Groups operations on the environment. To do this, the Group seeks to understand the environmental aspects and impacts of what it does, build what is learned into systems to manage and minimise those impacts, and set targets for improvement. After significant Group wide consultation, Rio Tintos environment standards were finalised and approved for implementation in 2003. During the year significant work was undertaken to set five year targets to improve efficiency of greenhouse gas emissions, energy use and water withdrawn from the environment. By the end of 2003, 80 per cent of operations had implemented ISO 14001 or an equivalent environmental management system ( EMS). All Rio Tinto operations are required to have a certified EMS by the end of June 2005: by the end of 2003, 64 per cent of operations had already achieved this. Fines for infringement of environmental regulations involved four operations and totalled US$126,000 (2002: two operations and US$2,000). No environmental incidents were classified as critical in 2003.
Land accessRio Tinto seeks to ensure the widest possible support for its proposals throughout the life cycle of the Groups activities by coordinating economic, technical, environmental and social factors in an integrated process. This involves negotiation of mining access agreements with indigenous landowners; responsible land management and rehabilitation; planning for closure; developing and implementing a biodiversity strategy; and forming strategic partnerships with external organisations.
Political involvementRio Tinto does not directly or indirectly participate in party politics nor make payments to political parties or individual politicians. A Business integrity guidance addressing bribery, corruption and political involvement was issued in 2003 to assist managers in implementing this policy. The guidance covers questions relating to compliance and implementation; gifts and entertainment; the use of agents and intermediaries; and facilitation payments. Rio Tinto avoids making facilitation payments anywhere in the world. Bribery in any form is prohibited. Gifts and
entertainment are only offered or accepted for conventional social and business purposes and then only at a level appropriate to the circumstances.
CommunitiesRio Tinto sets out to build enduring relationships with neighbours. This is characterised by mutual respect, active partnership, and long term commitment. Every business unit is required to have rolling five year community plans which are updated annually. In 2003, the Group completed a series of pilot studies aimed at achieving a deeper level of understanding of the linkages between mining activities and the economies in which they take place. All business units produce their own social and environment reports for local communities, and community assurance of the quality and content of these reports is increasing. This provides an opportunity for engagement with the community on their views of programmes sponsored by Group operations. Business units managed by Rio Tinto contributed US$70 million to community programmes in 2003 (2002: US$48 million). Part of the increase from 2002 (about US$7 million) was due to exchange rate movements against the US dollar. Of the total contributions, US$21 million were direct payments made under legislation or an agreement with a local community.
Human rightsRio Tinto supports human rights consistent with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Rio Tinto respects those rights in conducting the Groups operations throughout the world. Rio Tinto also supports the UN Secretary Generals Global Compact, the US/UK Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights and the Global Sullivan Principles. The Groups Human rights guidance is designed to assist managers in implementing the human rights policy in complex local situations. It was revised and republished in 2003 and a case study was provided to the Global Compact on how the guidance was developed and promoted around the Group.
EmploymentRio Tinto requires safe and effective working relationships at all levels. Whilst respecting different cultures, traditions and employment practices, common goals are shared, in particular the elimination of workplace injuries, and commitment to good corporate values and ethical behaviour. In 2003, Group companies employed 29,000 people (2002: 29,000) and together with Rio Tintos proportionate share of those employed by joint ventures and associates, the total was 36,000 (2002: 37,000).Australia and New Zealand (10,000), North America (10,000) and Africa (6,000) remained the principal locations.Wages and salaries paid in 2003 totalled
US$1.5 billion (2002: US$1.3 billion). Retirement payments and benefits to dependants are provided in accordance with local conditions and good practice. The total pension and other benefits paid in 2003 was US$278 million (2002: US$211 million).
Sustainable developmentRio Tinto believes that its businesses, projects, operations and products should contribute constructively to the global transition to sustainable development. All businesses are required to assess the sustainable development case for their activities. Rio Tinto has committed itself to integrating the results of the Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development (MMSD) analysis of 2002 into the Groups policy and objectives, and developing measures to assess their implementation. As a founding member of the International Council on Mining and Metals, Rio Tinto is participating in dialogue and programmes to advance industry wide progress on key sustainable development priorities.
Openness and accountabilityRio Tinto conducts its affairs in an accountable and transparent manner, reflecting the interests of Rio Tinto shareholders, employees, host communities and customers as well as others affected by the Groups activities. Policies on transparency, business integrity, corporate governance and internal controls and reporting procedures are outlined in The way we work. In 2003, a Compliance guidance was issued to provide a framework to enable each Group business to implement and maintain a best practice compliance programme which should identify and manage risks associated with non compliance with laws, regulations, codes, standards and Rio Tinto policies.
Assurance and verificationTo be accountable and transparent, assurance is provided to the Group and others that Rio Tinto policies are being implemented fully and consistently across our businesses and operations. The overall objective of external assurance and data verification is to provide assurance that the material in the Social and environment review is relevant, complete and accurate and, in particular, that Rio Tintos policies and programmes are reflected in implementation activities at operations. In 2003, Environmental Resources Management (ERM) undertook the external assurance and data verification programme and the results are available in the Social and environment review.
Executive committee members
01 Tom Albanese (age 46)Mr Albanese joined Rio Tinto in 1993 on Rio Tintos acquisition of Nerco. He holds a BS in mineral economics and an MS in mining engineering. He held a series of management positions before being appointed chief executive of the Industrial Minerals group in 2000.
02Preston Chiaro (age 50) Mr Chiaro was appointed chief executive of the Energy group in September 2003. He is an environmental engineer with Bachelor of Science, Environmental Engineering and Master of Engineering degrees. He joined the Group in 1991 at Kennecott Utah Coppers Bingham Canyon mine as vice president, technical services. In 1995 he became vice president and general manager of Boron operations in California. He was chief executive of Rio Tinto Borax from 1999 to 2003.
03Keith Johnson (age 42) Mr Johnson was appointed Group executive diamonds in 2003. He holds degrees in mathematics and management and is a fellow of the Royal Statistical Society. He joined Rio Tinto in 1991 and has held a series of management positions, most recently as managing director of Comalco Mining and Refining.
04 David Klingner (age 59)Dr Klingner became head of Exploration in 1997. He joined the Group as a geologist in 1966 and has had a wide variety of roles both in exploration and elsewhere during his 38 years service, including managing director of Kaltim Prima Coal. Later he was a Group executive with Rio Tinto Limited, responsible for coal and gold businesses located in Australia, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea.
05 Karen McLeod (age 57)Ms McLeod was appointed head of Human Resources for Rio Tinto in 1999. She joined the Group in 1974 at Comalco, working in Aboriginal affairs. She holds degrees in the social sciences and business management and has held senior positions in human resources, business analysis, marketing and organisation development.
06John OReilly (age 58)Mr OReilly joined Rio Tinto in 1987, following 20 years operations experience in Africa and the Middle East. A metallurgical engineer by profession, he has held a series of management positions, including director of Rio Tinto Technical Services, chief executive officer, Lihir Gold, and head of the former Gold & Other Minerals group, before being appointed head of Technology in 1999.
07 Christopher Renwick (age 61) Mr Renwick has been with Rio Tinto for 34 years and is currently chief executive of the Iron Ore group. He is a lawyer and has held several management positions within the Group, including commercial director of Hamersley Iron, managing director of Comalco Minerals and Alumina and a Group executive with Rio Tinto Limited. He was appointed to his current position in 1997.
08Andrew Vickerman (age 49) Mr Vickerman, previously head of External Affairs, became head of Communication and Sustainable Development in January 2003, with responsibility for both External Affairs and HSE. Prior to 1998 he was a director of Lihir Gold and was responsible for the financial and administrative aspects of the company. He has a BA, MA and PhD from Cambridge University. He joined Rio Tinto in 1991.
09 Sam Walsh (age 54)Mr Walsh was appointed chief executive of the Aluminium group in 2001. He holds a commerce degree and joined Rio Tinto in 1991, following 20 years working in the automotive industry. He has held a number of management positions within the Group, including managing director of Comalco Foundry Products, CRA Industrial Products, Hamersley Sales and Marketing, Hamersley Operations and vice president of Rio Tinto Iron Ore.
Brian Horwood will retire from the position of managing director of Rio Tinto Australia in early March 2004 after 34 years with the Group. He is succeeded by Charlie Lenegan, previously president director of PT Kelian Equatorial Mining, who joined the Group in 1981.
EmployeesInformation on the Groups employees including their costs, is on pages 56, 90, 117 and 133.
01 Paul Skinner (age 59)Mr Skinner was appointed chairman in November 2003. A director of Rio Tinto since 2001, he is chairman of the Nominations committee and the Committee on social and environmental accountability. He was previously a Managing Director of The Shell Transport and Trading Company plc and Group Managing Director of The Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies, for whom he had worked since 1966. He is a director of Standard Chartered PLC and a member of the board of INSEAD business school. (notes b and d)
06Sir Richard Giordano (age 69)Sir Richard is the senior non executive director and a deputy chairman. He is also chairman of the Audit committee. He has been a director of Rio Tinto plc since 1992 and of Rio Tinto Limited since 1995. A lawyer by training, he spent 12 years at BOC Group, first as chief executive, then chairman. In 1993, Sir Richard became a director of British Gas, assuming the role of chairman in 1994. A former chairman of BG Group plc, he is a director of Georgia Pacific Corporation in the US and a trustee of Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (notes a, b, and d)
08Sir David Clementi (age 55) Sir David was appointed a director of Rio Tinto in January 2003. He is chairman of Prudential plc, and prior to that appointment was deputy governor of the Bank of England. Sir Davids earlier career was with Kleinwort Benson where he spent 22 years, holding various positions including chief executive and vice chairman. A graduate of Oxford University and a qualified chartered accountant, Sir David also holds an MBA from Harvard Business School. (notes a and c)
02 Leigh Clifford (age 56)Mr Clifford became chief executive in 2000, having been a director of Rio Tinto plc since 1994 and Rio Tinto Limited since 1995. A mining engineer, he has held various roles in the Groups coal and metalliferous operations since joining in 1970, including managing director of Rio Tinto Limited and chief executive of the Energy group.Mr Clifford is also a director of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.
03 Robert Adams (age 58)Mr Adams was appointed a director of Rio Tinto plc in 1991 with responsibility for planning and development, and a director of Rio Tinto Limited in 1995. He joined the Group in 1970 after reading natural sciences and economics and subsequently gaining an MSc from the London Business School. Mr Adams is a non executive director of Foreign & Colonial Investment Trust plc.
04 Guy Elliott (age 48)Mr Elliott became finance director of Rio Tinto in 2002. He joined the Group in 1980 after gaining an MBA from INSEAD business school. He has subsequently held a variety of marketing, planning and development positions, most recently as head of Business Evaluation. From 1996 to 1999 he was president of Rio Tinto Brasil.
05 Oscar Groeneveld (age 50)Mr Groeneveld became a director of Rio Tinto in 1998. A mining engineer with qualifications in engineering, science and management, he joined the Group in 1975 and has since held a series of management positions, including head of Technology, before being appointed chief executive of the Copper group in 1999. Mr Groeneveld is also a director of Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc.
07 Leon Davis (age 64)Mr Davis is the Groups Australia based non executive deputy chairman. He became a director of Rio Tinto Limited in 1994 and of Rio Tinto plc in 1995. He is a metallurgist and during more than 40 years with the Group has held a number of managerial posts around the world, ultimately as chief executive from 1997 to 2000. He is chairman of Westpac Banking Corporation and a director of Codan Limited, Huysmans Pty Limited and Trouin Pty Limited, and is also president of the board of The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research. (note d)
09 Andrew Gould (age 57)Mr Gould was appointed a director of Rio Tinto in December 2002. He is chairman and chief executive officer of Schlumberger Limited. Prior to this appointment, Mr Gould, who joined Schlumberger in 1975 from Ernst & Young, has held a succession of financial and operational management positions within the Schlumberger group, including that of executive vice president of Schlumberger Oilfield Services and president and chief operating officer of Schlumberger Limited. (notes a and c)
10 Sir John Kerr (age 62) Sir John was appointed a director of Rio Tinto in October 2003. He was a member of the UK Diplomatic Service for 36 years, and its head from 1997 to 2002. During his career he was seconded to the UK Treasury where he was principal private secretary to two Chancellors of the Exchequer. His service abroad included spells as ambassador to the European Union from 1990 to 1995, and to the US from 1995 to 1997. He is also a director of The Shell Transport and Trading Company plc and Scottish American Investment Trust plc.
12John Morschel (age 60)Mr Morschel was appointed to the boards of Rio Tinto in 1998. Educated in Australia and the US, he spent most of his career with Lend Lease Corporation Limited in Australia, culminating as managing director, followed by two years as an executive director of the Westpac Banking Corporation. He is chairman of Leighton Holdings Limited, and of Rinker Group Limited and is a director of Tenix Pty Limited, Gifford Communications Pty Limited and Singapore Telecommunications Limited. He is also a patron of the Property Industry Foundation. (notes b, c and d)
14 Lord Tugendhat (age 67) Lord Tugendhat, who became a director of Rio Tinto in 1997 will retire from the boards at the conclusion of the 2004 annual general meetings. A former vice president of the Commission of the European Communities, and chairman of the Civil Aviation Authority, he was chairman of Abbey National plc from 1991 to 2002 when he was appointed chairman of Lehman Brothers Europe Limited. (notes a and d)
15 Anette Lawless (age 47)Mrs Lawless joined Rio Tinto in 1998 and became company secretary of Rio Tinto plc in 2000. A chartered secretary and a fellow of the ICSA, she also holds an MA from the Copenhagen Business School.
11 David Mayhew (age 63)Mr Mayhew was appointed a director of Rio Tinto in 2000. He is chairman of Cazenove Group plc, which he joined in 1969. Cazenove is a stockbroker to Rio Tinto plc. (notes a and b)
13Sir Richard Sykes (age 61) Sir Richard was appointed to the boards of Rio Tinto in 1997. He is chairman of the Remuneration committee. After reading microbiology, he obtained doctorates in microbial chemistry and in science. A former chairman of GlaxoSmithKline plc, Sir Richard is a director of Lonza Group Limited and is rector of the Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine. He is a fellow of the Royal Society and a trustee of the Natural History Museum in London and of the Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew. (note c)
Sir Robert Wilsonserved as chairman until his retirement on 31 October 2003.
Jonathan Leslieand The Hon. Raymond Seitz served as directors until 31 March 2003 and 1 May 2003 respectively.
16Stephen Consedine (age 42)Mr Consedine joined Rio Tinto in 1983 and became company secretary of Rio Tinto Limited in 2002. He holds a Bachelor of Business and is a Certified Practising Accountant.
Directors report for the year ended 31 December 2003
Dual listed companies Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited were unified under a dual listed companies structure in 1995, and the Directors report has been prepared as a joint report of both Companies and their respective subsidiaries. For a full description of the structure, please see page 77 to 79.
Activities and review of operations A detailed review of the Groups operations, results from those operations and principal activities during 2003, details of any significant changes in the Groups state of affairs during the year, post balance sheet events and likely future developments are given in the Chairmans letter on page 2 and the Chief executives report on pages 3 to 5 and the Operational review on pages 37 to 56. No matter or circumstance has arisen since the end of the 2003 financial year that has significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations, the results of the operations or state of affairs of the Group in future financial years. In accordance with section 299(3) of the Australian Corporations Act, further information regarding likely future developments in, and the expected results of, the operations of the Group have not been included.
Corporate governanceA report on corporate governance and compliance with the Combined Code appended to The Listing Rules of the UK Financial Services Authority, as well as the best practice guidelines of the Australian Stock Exchange, is set out on pages 70 to 72.
DirectorsDetails of each person who was a director at any time during or since the end of the year and their qualifications, experience and responsibilities are set out on pages 58 and 59. Sir Robert Wilson retired on 31 October 2003 with Paul Skinner succeeding him as chairman on 1 November 2003. Jonathan Leslie resigned with effect from 31 March 2003 and The Hon. Raymond Seitz retired with effect from the conclusion of the Rio Tinto Limited annual general meeting held on 1 May 2003. Sir John Kerr was appointed a non executive director on 14 October 2003. Sir John, who does not have a service contract, will retire and offers himself for election at the 2004 annual general meetings. Under the articles of association of Rio Tinto plc and the Rio Tinto Limited constitution, directors are required to retire from the board and offer themselves for re-election at least every three years. The following directors retire by rotation and being eligible, offer themselves for re-election: Leigh Clifford and Guy Elliott, who each have a service contract with Rio Tinto Limited and a subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc respectively which are terminable on one years notice by either party, and Sir Richard
Sykes, who does not have a service contract. Lord Tugendhat also retires by rotation, but does not offer himself for re-election. In addition, Sir Richard Giordano will have attained the age of 70 before the annual general meetings and in accordance with the Companies Act 1985, retires and offers himself for re-election at the annual general meetings. Special notice has been received by the Group of the intention to propose his re-election at the Rio Tinto plc annual general meeting. The beneficial interests of the directors and their families in shares and other securities of Group companies are shown on pages 66 and 67. The table on page 61 shows the number of meetings of the board and its committees held during the 2003 financial year, as well as each directors attendance at those meetings. A statement on the directors independence is set out on page 70.
DividendsDetails of dividends are set out on page 74.
Share capitalThere were no changes to the authorised share capital of Rio Tinto plc during the year. Details of the changes to the issued share capital of both Companies, the number of shares reserved for issue and the number of options outstanding at the year end, are given in note 24 to the Financial statements. Since the year end, 689,976 Rio Tinto plc shares and 1,736 Rio Tinto Limited shares have been issued as a result of the exercise of employee options. As at 6 February 2004, there were 9,110,266 options outstanding over Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares and 5,976,777 options outstanding over Rio Tinto Limited shares in connection with employee share plans. At the annual general meeting of Rio Tinto plc held in April 2003, the authorities for Rio Tinto plc to buy its own shares and for Rio Tinto Limited to buy shares in Rio Tinto plc were renewed and extended until October 2004. These authorities enable Rio Tinto plc to buy back up to ten per cent of its publicly held shares in any 12 month period. Under the Australian Corporations Act 2001, Rio Tinto Limited is currently permitted to buy back up to ten per cent of its shares on market in any 12 month period without seeking shareholder approval. However, at its annual general meeting held in May 2003 Rio Tinto Limited renewed shareholder approvals to buy back up to all the Rio Tinto Limited shares held by Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc) plus up to ten per cent of the publicly held share capital in any 12 month period on market. During 2003, neither Company purchased shares under the relevant authorities given to them.
Remuneration of directors and executivesA discussion of the Groups policy for determining the nature and amount of remuneration of directors and senior
executives, and of the relationship between that policy and the Groups performance appears in the Remuneration report on pages 62 to 69. The Remuneration report includes details of the nature and amount of each element of the remuneration of each director and of the five executives of the Group receiving the highest remuneration.
Environmental regulationDetails of the Groups environmental performance are set out on pages 55 and 56.
Indemnities and insuranceUnder the Rio Tinto plc articles of association and the Rio Tinto Limited constitution, each Company is required to indemnify each officer of the respective Company and each officer of each wholly-owned subsidiary, to the extent permitted by law, against liability incurred in, or arising out of the conduct of the business of the company or the discharge of the duties of the officer. During 2003, the Group paid premiums for directors and officers insurance. The policy indemnifies all directors and some Group employees against certain liabilities they may incur in carrying out their duties for the Group. The directors have not included details of the nature and of the liabilities covered or the amount of the premium paid in respect of directors and officers insurance as, in accordance with commercial practice, such disclosure is prohibited under the policy.
Employment policiesGroup companies, together with the Groups share of joint ventures and associates, employed approximately 36,000 (2002: 37,000) people worldwide, with around 10,000 in Australia and New Zealand and 1,000 in the United Kingdom. Rio Tintos employment policy is set out in the statement of business practice, The way we work. Rio Tinto is committed to equality of opportunity and encourages each operating company to develop its own policies and practices to suit individual circumstances. Management development and succession planning are regularly reviewed. Group companies employ disabled people and accept the need to maintain and develop careers for them. If an employee becomes disabled whilst in employment and, as a result, is unable to perform his or her duties, every effort is made to offer suitable alternative employment and to assist with retraining. Rio Tinto respects the right of employees worldwide to choose for themselves whether or not they wish to be represented collectively. Group companies recognise their obligations to comply with health and safety legislation and, through training and communication, encourage employee awareness of the need to create and secure a safe and healthy working environment. For further information about Group staff and health and safety initiatives, please see pages 55 and 56.
Retirement payments and benefits to dependants are provided by Rio Tinto and its major subsidiaries in accordance with local conditions and practice in the countries concerned.
Policy regarding payment of trade creditorsIt is the policy of both Companies to abide by terms of payment agreed with suppliers. In many cases, the terms of payment are as stated in the suppliers own literature. In other cases, the terms of payment are determined by specific written or oral agreement. Neither Company follows any published code or standard on payment practice. At 31 December 2003, there were 20 days purchases outstanding in respect of Rio Tinto Limited costs and 15 days purchases outstanding in respect of Rio Tinto plc costs, based on the total invoiced by suppliers during the year.
DonationsWorldwide expenditure on community programmes by Rio Tinto managed businesses amounted to US$70 million (2002: US$48 million). Donations in the UK during 2003 amounted to £3.6 million of which £0.4 million was for charitable purposes as defined by the Companies Act 1985 and £3.2 million for other community purposes. As in previous years, no donations were made in the EU or elsewhere during 2003 for political purposes as defined by the UK Companies Act 1985 as amended by the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. Total community spending in Australia amounted to A$56.5 million. Again, no donations were made for political purposes.
Value of landGroup companies interests in land consist mainly of leases and other rights which permit the working of such land and the erection of buildings and equipment thereon for the purpose of extracting and treating minerals. Such land is mainly carried in the financial statements at cost. It is not practicable to estimate the market value since this depends on product prices over the next 20 years or longer, which will vary with market conditions.
Exploration, research and developmentCompanies within the Group carry out exploration, research and development necessary to support their activities. Grants are also made to universities and other institutions which undertake research on subjects relevant to the activities of Group companies. A description of some aspects of the work currently being undertaken and expenditure involved is provided in the Operational review. Cash expenditure during the year was US$130 million for exploration and evaluation and US$23 million for research and development.
AuditorsFollowing the conversion of the UK firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers to a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) from 1 January 2003, PricewaterhouseCoopers resigned as auditor of Rio Tinto plc on 27 January 2003 and the directors appointed its successor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as auditor. A resolution to re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor of Rio Tinto plc was passed at the 2003 annual general meetings of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited. The Australian arm of PricewaterhouseCoopers continued in office as auditor of Rio Tinto Limited.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP have indicated their willingness to continue in office as auditor of Rio Tinto plc. A resolution to re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor of Rio Tinto plc will be proposed at the 2004 annual general meetings. PricewaterhouseCoopers will continue in office as auditor of Rio Tinto Limited.
Annual general meetingsThe notices of the 2004 annual general meetings are set out in separate letters to shareholders of each Company. At the Rio Tinto plc annual general meeting these include a resolution for the renewal of the authority for Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited to purchase Rio Tinto plc shares and for the approval of the Mining Companies Comparative Plan and the Share Option Plan. At the Rio Tinto Limited annual general meeting resolutions include the renewal of the authorities for Rio Tinto Limited to buy back its shares, the approval of the Mining Companies Comparative Plan and the Share Option Plan, and the approval of share awards and share option grants to certain executive directors.
Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988The close company provisions of the UK Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 do not apply to Rio Tinto plc.The Directors report is made in accordance with a resolution of the board.
Directors attendance at board and committee meetings during 2003
Remuneration report
The committee may invite non committee members to attend meetings in an advisory capacity as appropriate. Executives are not present at meetings when their own remuneration is discussed. During 2003, Paul Skinner, the present chairman, attended three meetings of the committee as an observer and adviser. The then chairman of the Group, Sir Robert Wilson, the chief executive, Leigh Clifford, and the Group adviser, remuneration, Jeffery Kortum also attended meetings in an advisory capacity. Anette Lawless, the company secretary of Rio Tinto plc, acts as secretary to the committee. The committee obtained advice from Kepler Associates, an independent consultancy with no other links to the Group. The committee monitors global remuneration trends and developments in order to fulfil the functions set out in its terms of reference and draws on a range of external sources of data, including publications by remuneration consultants Towers Perrin, Hewitt Associates, Hay Group, Watson Wyatt and Monks Partnership. The Groups Remuneration report for 2002 was approved by shareholders at the 2003 annual general meetings. Towards the end of 2002, the committee decided that it would undertake a detailed review of the design of the Groups executive remuneration programme during 2003 to ensure it complies with contemporary best practice. Consequently, shareholders will be asked to consider and approve new share based incentive plans at the 2004 annual general meetings.
Corporate governanceAt its meeting in December 2003, the committee reviewed its terms of reference in the light of the publication in the UK of the new Combined Code (the new Code) and the ASX Best Practice Corporate Governance Guidelines. Although the new Code was not in force during 2003, the committee nevertheless concluded that, in the course of its business, it had covered the main duties
as set out in the Higgs guidance, and was constituted in accordance with the requirements of the new Code. Both Companies comply with the remuneration guidelines in Principle 9 of the ASX Best Practice Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Following this review it is proposed that new plans be introduced in 2004. They are outlined on pages 63 and 64 of this report as well as in the notices of the 2004 annual general meetings. The new plans will maintain the expected value of the total remuneration for executive directors and product group chief executives at approximately their current levels.
The short term and long term incentive plans are variable components of the total remuneration package as they are tied to achievement of specific measures of personal and/or business performance and are therefore at risk. The other components of the package are referred to as fixed as they are not at risk, although some, eg base salary, are also related to performance. The composition of the total remuneration package is designed to provide an appropriate balance between the fixed and variable components, in line with Rio Tintos policy objective of aligning total remuneration with delivered personal and business performance. Excluding allowances and pension or superannuation arrangements, the proportion of total direct remuneration provided by way of variable components (annual short term incentive, SOP and MCCP), assuming target levels of performance, is currently approximately 68 per cent for the chief executive and 62 per cent for the other executive directors.
Base salaryBase salary for executive directors and product group chief executives is set at a level consistent with market practice for companies with a similar geographical spread and complexity of businesses. Base salaries are reviewed annually by the Remuneration committee, taking account of the nature of the role, external market trends and personal and business performance.
Performance targets for executive directors and product group chief executives are approved by the Remuneration committee. The target level of bonus for these participants for 2004 is 60 per cent of salary, (the same as 2003), with bonus potential capped at 120 per cent of salary. The format
for the STIP award calculation for 2004 and future years has been varied from that applying previously to provide greater performance related variation above and below target. The award cap was previously 100 per cent of salary. Awards above this level are expected to be rare and will only be achieved with outstanding performance against all personal and business performance criteria. Awards in respect of 2003, payable in 2004, are included as annual bonus in Tables 1 and 6 on page 65 and 69.
Long term incentivesAs indicated elsewhere in this report, theRemuneration committee reviewed the Rio Tinto long term incentive plans during 2003 and the plans outlined below are proposed for introduction in 2004. The proposed plans aim to enhance the alignment of the interests of the executive directors and other senior executives with those of the shareholders, by linking rewards to Group performance. The proposed plans will maintain the expected value of total remuneration for executive directors and product group chief executives at approximately their current levels. A key feature of the proposals for Rio Tintos long term incentive plan arrangements for 2004 and beyond involves a change in the relative proportions in which share options and performance shares are provided. Performance shares will become the primary long term incentive vehicle whereas previously, the executive remuneration package has been heavily biased towards share options.
The choice of the US Consumer Price Index as a measure of performance was consistent with the presentation of financial data in US dollars and reflected the importance of the US economy to the Group. Subject to shareholder approval at the 2004 annual general meetings, vesting of options granted under the new SOP in 2004 and in subsequent years will be subject to Rio Tintos three year Total Shareholder Return (TSR) equalling or outperforming the HSBC Global Mining Index. If Rio Tintos three year TSR performance equals the index, then the higher of one third of the original grant or 20,000 options will vest (subject to the actual grant level not being exceeded). The full grant vests if Rio Tintos three year TSR performance is equal to or greater than the HSBC Global Mining Index plus five per cent per annum. Vesting is based on a sliding scale between these points and there is zero vesting for three year TSR performance less than the index. The committee proposes changing from the EPS performance measure that applied previously, to the new relative TSR condition as it considers that relative TSR provides better alignment with shareholder interests and reflects Rio Tintos performance relative to comparator companies across the resources sector. The committee also proposes to reduce the number of retests available under the SOP from seven rolling retests to a single fixed base retest five years after grant. Although the committee understands the preference of investors to eliminate retesting altogether, the committee feels it is important to maintain a single retest at this time. Due to the cyclical nature of our industry and our focus on long term decision making, the committee believes a five year retest will help extend participants time horizons and strengthen retention. Additionally, we operate in a sector where the reliance of certain competitors on a single commodity means that price swings can have effects on relative TSR unrelated to management performance. However, the committee acknowledges the changing practice regarding retesting and has determined that options granted after31 December 2006 will not be subject to retest and will therefore lapse if they do not vest at the conclusion of the three year performance period. Prior to any options being released to participants for exercise, the Groups performance against the criteria relevant to the SOP is examined and verified by the external auditors. The Remuneration committee retains discretion in satisfying itself that the TSR performance is a genuine reflection of underlying financial performance. The maximum grant size under the SOP will be reduced from five times salary to three times salary for 2004 and future years, calculated as the average share price over the previous financial year.
Share options granted to directors are included in Table 5 on page 68.
Mining Companies Comparative Plan (MCCP)Under this plan, a conditional right to receive shares is granted annually to participants. These conditional awards only vest if performance conditions approved by the committee are satisfied. Awards are not pensionable. The performance condition compares Rio Tintos Total Shareholder Return (TSR) with the TSR of a comparator group of 15 other international mining companies over the same four year period. Rio Tintos TSR is calculated as a weighted average of the TSR of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited (previously of Rio Tinto plc alone). The composition of this comparator group is reviewed regularly by the committee to provide continued relevance in a consolidating industry. The current members of this group are listed at the bottom of the table below. The committee continues to regard TSR as the most appropriate measure of a companys performance for the purpose of share based long term incentive plans. The maximum award size under the MCCP will be increased from 70 per cent of salary to two times salary for 2004 and future years calculated on the average Share price over the previous financial year. This increase is balanced by the reduction in SOP maximum grant size referred to above. The following table shows the percentage of each conditional award which will be received by directors and product group chief executives based on Rio Tinto four year TSR performance relative to the comparator group (for grants after 1 January 2004).
The historical ranking of Rio Tinto in relation to the comparator group is shown in the following table:
Ranking of Rio Tinto versuscomparator companies
Remuneration report continued
Going forward, following the acquisition of MIM Holdings Limited by Xstrata Limited, MIM Holdings Limited will be replaced by WMC Resources Limited. Prior to awards being released to participants, the Groups performance relative to the comparator companies is reviewed by the external auditors. The Remuneration committee retains discretion to satisfy itself that the TSR performance is a genuine reflection of underlying financial performance. Awards will be released to participants in the form of Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited shares or an equivalent amount in cash, as appropriate. In addition, a cash payment will be made to participants equivalent to the dividends that would have accrued on that vested number of shares over the four year period. Such shares may be acquired by purchase in the market, by subscription or, in the case of Rio Tinto Limited, by procuring that Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Limited transfers existing shares to participants.
Australian executive directors may participate in the Rio Tinto Limited Share Savings Plan introduced in 2001, which is similar to the Rio Tinto plc Share Savings Plan.
Pension and superannuation arrangementsUK executive directors are, like all UK staff, eligible to participate in the non contributory Rio Tinto Pension Fund, a funded, Inland Revenue approved, final salary occupational pension scheme. The Fund provides a pension from normal retirement age at 60 of two thirds final pensionable salary, subject to completion of 20 years service. Spouse and dependants pensions are also provided. Proportionally lower benefits are payable for shorter service. Members retiring early may draw a pension reduced by approximately four per cent a year for each year of early payment from age 50 onwards. Under the rules of the Rio Tinto Pension Fund, all pensions are guaranteed to increase
annually in line with increases in the UK Retail Price Index subject to a maximum of ten per cent per annum. Increases above this level are discretionary. When pensionable salary is limited by the UK Inland Revenue earnings cap, benefits are provided from unfunded supplementary arrangements. Cash contributions were not paid in 2003 as the Rio Tinto Pension Fund remained fully funded. In June 2003, the Government announced that the implementation of the proposals in the Green Paper Simplicity, Security and Choice: working and saving for retirement was delayed until April 2005. The review of Rio Tinto plcs UK pension arrangements envisaged in last years report has therefore been correspondingly delayed to 2004 to take account of changes in the Governments proposals and timetable. Australian executive directors are eligible for membership of the Rio Tinto Staff Superannuation Fund, a funded superannuation fund regulated by Australian legislation, that provides both defined benefit and defined contribution benefits. In 2003, cash contributions were paid into the Rio Tinto Staff Superannuation Fund to fund members defined benefit and defined contribution benefits. The Australian executive directors are not required to pay contributions. They are defined benefit members, accruing lump sums payable on retirement after age 57 of 20 per cent of final basic salary for each year of service.Retirement benefits are limited to a lump sum multiple of seven times final basic salary at age 62. For retirement after 62, the benefit increases to 7.6 times average salary at age 65. In January 2004, Leigh Cliffords contractual retirement age was reduced from 62 to 60. A corresponding change has been made to his retirement arrangements. Death in service and disablement benefits are provided as lump sums and are equal to the prospective age 65 retirement benefit. Proportionate benefits are also payable on termination of employment for ill health or resignation. Annual awards under the STIP are pensionable up to a maximum value of 20 per cent of basic salary. The percentage of total remuneration which is dependent on performance is substantial and has risen over recent years. In view of this, the committee considers it appropriate that a proportion of such pay should be pensionable. Details of directors pension and superannuation entitlements are set out in Table 2 on page 66.
Other benefitsOther remuneration items include health benefits and a car allowance. Housing and childrens education assistance are also provided for executive directors and product group chief executives living outside their home country.
Full details of the directors annual remuneration before tax and excluding pension contributions are set out in Table 1 on page 65. Details of long term incentive plans and option plans are set out on page 67.
Chairmans letter of appointmentPaul Skinners letter of appointment summarises his duties as chairman of the Group and was agreed by the Remuneration committee. It stipulates that he is expected to dedicate at least three days per week on average to carry out these duties. The letter envisages that Mr Skinner will continue in the role of chairman until he reaches the age of 65 in 2009, subject to re-election as a director by shareholders. Details of Mr Skinners fees can be found in Table 1 on page 65.
Service contracts and compensation paymentsAll executive directors have service contracts with a one year notice period. Under current pension arrangements, directors are normally expected to retire at the age of 60, except Oscar Groeneveld, whose agreed retirement age is 62. In the event of early termination, the Groups policy is to act fairly in all circumstances and the duty to mitigate would be taken into account. Compensation would not reward poor performance. Of the directors proposed for election or re-election at the forthcoming annual general meetings, Leigh Clifford and Guy Elliott have service contracts which are terminable by one years notice.Sir Richard Giordano, Sir John Kerr and Sir Richard Sykes do not have service contracts. Sir Richard Giordano will be aged 70 at the time of the 2004 annual general meetings. Special notice for his re-election has been received by Rio Tinto plc.
Non executive directors fees and letters of appointmentThe boards as a whole determine non executive directors fees. They are set to reflect the responsibilities and time spent by the directors on the affairs of Rio Tinto. Non executive directors are not eligible to vote on any increases of their fees. The boards reviewed these fees in October 2003 and, in the light of the increased volume of committee work following regulatory developments in the UK, US and Australia, it was decided to introduce additional fees for membership of the Audit committee, increase the Audit committee chairmans fees and introduce a fee for chairing the Remuneration committee. In recognition of exchange rate movements, Australian directors basic fees were increased to bring them into line with the directors who are paid in pounds sterling. Non executive directors do not participate in the Groups incentive plans, pension or superannuation arrangements or any other elements of remuneration provided to executive directors.
Non executive directors do not have service contracts, but have a formal letter of appointment setting out their duties and responsibilities.
Directors share interestsThe beneficial interests of directors in the share capital of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited are set out in Table 3 on page 66. In 2002, the committee informed executive directors and product group chief executives that they would be expected to build up a shareholding equal in value to two times salary over five years. New appointees to executive director or product group chief executive roles have five years from the date of appointment to achieve the required shareholding.
External appointmentsRio Tinto recognises that executive directors are likely to be invited to become non executive directors of other companies and that such appointments can broaden their experience and knowledge, to the benefit of the Group. It is, however, Group policy to limit such directorships to one FTSE 100 company or equivalent. No executive director is allowed to take on the chairmanship of another FTSE 100 company. Where such directorships are unlikely to give rise to conflicts of interests, the boards will normally give consent to the appointment, with the director permitted to retain the fees earned. Details of fees earned are set out in the notes to Table 1 below.
Performance of Rio TintoTo illustrate the performance of the companies relative to their markets, graphs showing the performance of Rio Tinto plc compared to the FTSE 100 Index and Rio Tinto Limited compared to the ASX All Ordinaries Index are reproduced in this report. A comparative graph showing Rio Tinto performance relative to the HSBC Global Mining Index is also included to illustrate the performance of the companies relative to other mining companies. Shareholders will be asked to vote on this Remuneration report at the Companies forthcoming annual general meetings.
By order of the boardAnette Lawless SecretaryRemuneration committee 20 February 2004
TSR Rio Tinto plc vs FTSE 100Total return basis Index 1998 = 100
TSR Rio Tinto Limited vs ASX All ShareTotal return basis Index 1998 = 100
TSR Rio Tinto plc vs HSBC Global Mining IndexTotal return basis Index 1998 = 100
Table 1 Directors remuneration Remuneration of the directors of the parent Companies before tax and excluding pension contributions for the year ended 31 December
Table 2 Directors pension entitlements (as at 31 December 2003)
Table 3 Directors beneficial interests in shares
Rio Tintos register of directors interests, which is open to inspection, contains full details of directors shareholdings and options to subscribe for Rio Tinto shares.
Auditable partTables 1, 2, 4 and 5 comprise the auditable part of the Remuneration report, being the information required by Part 3 of schedule 7a to the Companies Act 1985.
Corporate governance
Rio Tinto is committed to high standards of corporate governance, for which the directors are accountable to shareholders. Over the last several years, corporate governance discussions have taken centre stage in the UK, Australia and the US, where Rio Tinto has its three main listings. In setting out the Groups corporate governance statement, the boards have therefore referred to the Combined Code as attached to the UK Listing Authoritys Listing Rules (the current Code), the new Combined Code (the new Code), the ASX Best Practice Corporate Governance Guidelines and the NYSE Corporate Governance Listing Standards, as well as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited have adopted a common approach to corporate governance. Both Companies have, for the period under review, applied the principles contained in Part 1 of the current Code. The detailed provisions of Section 1 of the current Code have been complied with as described below. As at the date of the Directors report both Companies also complied with the ASX Best Practice Corporate Governance Guidelines. In addition, Rio Tinto has voluntarily adopted the recommendations of the US Blue Ribbon Committee in respect of disclosures to shareholders, as detailed in the Audit committees statement on page 72. Rio Tinto intends to include on its website a brief summary of significant differences, if any, in the way its corporate governance practices differ from those followed by US companies under NYSE listing standards. The boards will continue to monitor developments in the corporate governance area in Rio Tintos three principal share markets. A statement relating to directors responsibilities for going concern and preparation of the financial statements is on pages 71 and 72.
The boardThe Companies have common boards of directors, which are collectively responsible for the success of the Group.
Board compositionOn 1 November 2003, Paul Skinner, until then an independent non executive director, became chairman, succeeding Sir Robert Wilson, who retired after 33 years with Rio Tinto. The boards currently comprise 14 directors, four executive and nine non executive directors and the chairman. The boards have reviewed the independence of all non executive directors and determined that, of the nine non executive directors, seven are independent. Notwithstanding that Sir Richard Giordano has served as a director since 1992, the strength, objectivity and nature of his contribution to board and committee discussions were fully consistent with those of an independent director. Two have connections with the Group: Leon Davis
is a former chief executive of the Group and David Mayhew is chairman of one of Rio Tinto plcs stockbrokers. The directors biographies are set out on pages 58 and 59.
Chairman and chief executiveThe roles of the chairman and chief executive are separate and the division of their responsibilities has been formally approved by the boards.
The role of the boardCollectively, the non executive directors bring broadly based knowledge and experience to the boards deliberations and their contribution is vital to corporate accountability. As recommended in the new Code, they have agreed performance targets for management against the Groups 2004 financial plan. The boards had eight scheduled and one special meeting in 2003. Details of directors attendances at board and committee meetings are set out in the Directors report on page 61. In line with best practice, the boards have regular scheduled discussions on various aspects of the Groups strategy. In addition, one meeting was a two day meeting, the main purpose of which was an in depth discussion of Group strategy. Management of the business is the responsibility of executive management. The board approves strategy, major investments and acquisitions and is ultimately accountable to the shareholders for the performance of the business. All directors have full and timely access to the information required to discharge their responsibilities fully and effectively. There is a formal schedule of matters specifically reserved for decision by the boards, a copy of which is posted on the Groups website. This schedule is reviewed regularly to ensure continued relevance. Going forward, the chairman will be holding meetings with non executive directors without the executive directors present. Furthermore the non executive directors will meet annually in a meeting chaired by the senior non executive director to appraise the chairmans performance.
Communication with the investor communityThe main channels of communication with the investor community are through the chief executive, the finance director and the chairman. The Group also organises regular investor seminars, which provide a two way communication with investors and analysts, with valuable feedback which is communicated to the boards. In addition, the Groups external investor relations advisors carry out a survey of major shareholders opinion and perception of the Group. The ensuing report is distributed and a formal annual presentation is made to the boards on the subject.
Independent adviceA procedure has been established for
directors to obtain independent professional advice at the Groups expense in furtherance of their duties as directors. They also have access to the advice and services of both company secretaries.
Election and re-electionAll directors are elected by shareholders at the annual general meetings following their appointment and, thereafter, are subject to re-election at least once every three years. Non executive directors are normally expected to serve at least two terms of three years and, except where special circumstances justify it, would not normally serve more than three such terms.
Board performanceIn compliance with Clause A.6 of the new Code and Principle 8 of the ASX Best Practice Corporate Governance Guidelines, the performance of Rio Tintos board, its committees and individual directors have been evaluated. The assessment has been carried out by external advisers and has covered the following areas: board dynamics; board capability; board process; corporate governance, strategic clarity and alignment; board structure; and the performance of individual directors. In the opinion of the boards they comply with the requirements of the new Code and the ASX Best Practice Corporate Governance Guidelines. It is the intention of the boards to continue to review both board and director performance on an annual basis.
Board committeesThe directors have established four committees, all of which are fundamental to good corporate governance in the Group. All committee terms of reference are reviewed annually by the boards and the committees themselves, and appear on the Groups website. Regular reports of committee business and activities are given to the boards and minutes are circulated to all directors. Committee members, shown on pages 58 and 59, are all non executive directors. The Audit committees main responsibilities include the review of accounting principles, policies and practices adopted in the preparation of public financial information; the review with management of procedures relating to financial and capital expenditure controls, including internal audit plans and reports; the review with external auditors of the scope and results of their audit; the nomination of auditors for appointment by shareholders; and the review of and recommendation to the board for approval of Rio Tintos risk management policy. Its responsibilities also include the review of corporate governance practices of Group sponsored pension funds. A number of training sessions, which may cover new legislation and other relevant information, have been incorporated into the committees normal schedule of business.
The external auditors, the finance director, the Group controller and Group internal auditor attend meetings. A copy of the Audit committee charter is reproduced on page 73 and can also be found on the Group website. TheRemuneration committee is responsible for determining the policy for executive remuneration and for the remuneration and benefits of individual executive directors. Full disclosure of all elements of directors and certain senior executives remuneration can be found in theRemuneration report on pages 62 to 69, together with details of the Groups remuneration policies. TheNominations committee is chaired by the chairman of Rio Tinto. It is the committees responsibility to ensure that there is a clear, appropriate and transparent process in place to source and appoint new directors. Its responsibilities also include evaluating the balance of skills, knowledge and experience on the boards and identifying and nominating, for the approval by the boards, candidates to fill board vacancies as and when they arise. The committee reviews the structure, size and composition of the boards and make recommendations with regard to any changes it considers appropriate. Finally, the committee reviews the time required to be committed to Group business by non executive directors and assess whether non executive directors are spending enough time to carry out their duties. TheCommittee on social and environmental accountability is responsible for reviewing the effectiveness of management policies and procedures in delivering the standards set out in The way we work, Rio Tintos statement of business practice, which do not fall within the remit of other board committees and, in particular, those relating to health, safety, the environment and social issues. The overall objective of the committee is to promote the development of business practices throughout the Group, consistent with the high standards expected of a responsibly managed company and to develop the necessary clear accountability on these practices.
Directors dealings in shares Rio Tinto has a Group policy in place to govern the dealing in Rio Tinto securities. The policy, which can be viewed on the Rio Tinto website, is no less stringent than the Model Code set out in the UK Listing Rules.Directors and employees are prohibited from dealing when in possession of price sensitive information. Directors and certain employees are prohibited from dealing during the close periods which are the periods of up to two months before a profit announcement. Directors and designated employees are also prohibited from dealing in Rio Tinto securities at any time on considerations of a short term nature.
Statement of business practice The way we work provides the directors and
all Group employees with a summary of the principal policies and procedures in place to help ensure that high standards are met. Policies are adopted by the directors after wide consultation, both externally and within the Group. Once adopted they are communicated to business units worldwide, together with guidance and support on implementation. Business units are then required to devote the necessary effort by management to implement and report on these policies. The way we work was reviewed and updated in 2003 to reflect best practice and procedures were introduced to meet changed requirements. The following policies are currently in place: health, safety and the environment; communities; human rights; access to land; employees; business integrity; bribery and corruption; corporate governance; compliance; external disclosures, including continuous disclosure and code of ethics covering the preparation of financial statements and political involvement. These policies apply to all Rio Tinto managed businesses. In line with best practice, the Group has in place a Group wide whistle blowing programme entitled Speak-OUT. Under this programme, employees are encouraged to report any concerns, including any suspicion of a violation of the Groups financial reporting and environmental procedures, through an independent third party and without fear of recrimination. In the case of business partners, such as joint ventures and associated companies, where the Group does not have operating responsibility, Rio Tintos policies are communicated to them and they are encouraged to adopt similar policies of their own. Practical advice is offered wherever appropriate. In 2001, the Association of British Insurers issued its guidelines relating to socially responsible investment. Rio Tintos report on social and environmental matters follows these guidelines and can be found on pages 55 and 56 of 2003 Annual report and financial statements and on pages 22 to 25 of the 2003 Annual review. Details of the Groups overall and individual businesses social and environmental performance continue to be published on Rio Tintos website: www.riotinto.com
Responsibilities of the directors The directors are required by UK and Australian company law to prepare financial statements for each financial period which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group as at the end of the financial period and of the profit or loss and cash flows for that period. To ensure that this requirement is satisfied the directors are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls and procedures for financial reporting throughout the Group. The directors consider that the financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with applicable accounting standards, using the most appropriate accounting policies for Rio Tintos business and supported by reasonable and prudent judgments. The accounting policies have been consistently applied. The directors, senior management, senior financial managers and other members of staff who are required to exercise judgment in the course of the preparation of the financial statements are required to conduct themselves with integrity and honesty and in accordance with the ethical standards of their profession and/or business. The directors are responsible for maintaining proper accounting records, in accordance with the UK Companies Act 1985 and the Australian Corporations Act 2001 as modified by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission order dated 21 July 2003, and have a general responsibility for taking such steps as are reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group, and to prevent and detect fraud and other irregularities. The directors are also responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the Groups website. The work carried out by the auditors does not involve consideration of these matters and, accordingly, the auditors accept no responsibility for any changes that may have occurred to the financial statements since they were initially loaded on the website.
Going concern The financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis. As required by the current Code, the directors report that they have satisfied themselves that the Group is a going concern since it has adequate financial resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future.
Boards statement on internal control Rio Tintos overriding corporate objective is to maximise long term shareholder value through responsibly and sustainably investing in mining and related assets. The directors recognise that creating shareholder value is the reward for taking and accepting risk. The directors are responsible for the Groups system of internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness in providing shareholders with a return on their investments that is consistent with a responsible assessment and mitigation of risks. This includes reviewing financial, operational and compliance controls, and risk management procedures. Because of the limitations inherent in any such system, this is designed to manage rather than eliminate risk. Accordingly, it provides reasonable, but not absolute assurance, against material misstatement or loss. The directors have established a process for identifying, evaluating and managing the significant risks faced by the Group.This process was in place during 2003 and up to and including the date of approval of the 2003 Annual report and financial
Corporate governance continued
statements. The process is reviewed annually by the directors and accords with the guidance set out in Internal Control: Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code. The Groups management committees review information on the Groups significant risks, with relevant control and monitoring procedures, for completeness and accuracy. This information is presented to the directors to enable them to assess the effectiveness of the internal controls. In addition, the boards and their committees monitor the Groups significant risks on an ongoing basis. Assurance functions, including internal auditors and health, safety and environmental auditors, perform reviews of control activities and provide regular written and oral reports to directors and management committees. The directors receive and review minutes of the meetings of each board committee, in addition to oral reports from the respective chairmen at the first board meeting following the relevant committee meeting. Certain risks, for example natural disasters, cannot be mitigated to an acceptable degree using internal controls. Such major risks are transferred to third parties in the international insurance markets, to the extent considered appropriate. Each year, the leaders of Group businesses and administrative offices complete an internal control questionnaire that seeks to confirm that adequate internal controls are in place and operating effectively. The results of this process are reviewed by the Executive committee it is then presented to the board as a further part of their review of the Groups internal controls. This process is continually reviewed and strengthened as appropriate. In 2002, the Group also established aDisclosure and procedures committee which was tasked with reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of Group controls over and procedures for the public disclosure of financial and related information. The committee has been presenting the results of this process to senior management and directors and will continue to do so. The Group has material investments in a number of joint ventures and associated companies. Rio Tinto cannot guarantee that local management of mining assets, where it does not have managerial control, will comply with the Groups standards or objectives. Accordingly, the review of their internal controls is less comprehensive than that for the Groups managed operations.
CommunicationsCommunications with shareholders are given high priority. The boards have responsibility to ensure that a satisfactory dialogue with shareholders takes place. In addition to statutory documents, such as the Annual report and financial statements, Annual review andHalf year report, Rio Tinto produces documents on a wide range of subjects, including corporate social responsibility, which are available on request.
Further details are set out in the Shareholder information on page 79. Rio Tinto maintains a comprehensive website, www.riotinto.com, from which its reports and other publications can be freely downloaded and through which shareholders can gain secure online access to their shareholding details. It is also linked to websites maintained by Group operations, thus offering easy access to a wealth of detailed information about the Group. Results presentations and other significant events are also available as they happen and as an archive on the website. Full use is made of the annual general meetings to inform shareholders of current developments through appropriate presentations and to provide opportunities for questions. Significant matters affecting both Companies are dealt with under the joint voting procedure, detailed on page 78. Votes, which are cast on a poll, are announced after the close of the later of the two annual general meetings. In addition the Companies respond to individual queries on many issues.
Audit committee: US Blue RibbonCompliance statement TheAudit committee meets the membership requirements of the Combined Code in the UK and the Blue Ribbon Report in the US. The Group also meets the disclosure requirements in respect of audit committees required by the Australian Stock Exchange. The Audit committee is governed by a written charter approved by the boards, which the Audit committee reviews and reassesses each year for adequacy. A copy of this charter is reproduced on page 73. TheAudit committee comprises the five members set out below. The members, with the exception of David Mayhew, are independent and are free of any relationship that would interfere with impartial judgment in carrying out their responsibilities. Mr Mayhew is technically not deemed to be independent by virtue of his professional association with the Group in his capacity as chairman of Cazenove Group plc, a stockbroker and financial adviser to Rio Tinto plc. However, the boards have determined that, in their business judgment, the relationship does not interfere with Mr Mayhews exercise of independent judgment and they believe that his appointment is in the best interests of the Group because of the substantial financial knowledge and expertise he brings to the committee.
Report of the Audit committee TheAudit committee met eight times in 2003. We monitor developments in corporate governance in the US, Australia and the UK. We do so to ensure the Group continues to apply high and appropriate standards relevant to the jurisdictions in which we operate. Many of the new US requirements have long been best practice and are incorporated into the committees Charter, reproduced on
page 73. The Charter is subject to regular discussion and has been reviewed in the light of new requirements and emerging best practice. There is in place a set of procedures, including budgetary guidelines, for the appointment of the external auditor to undertake non audit work, which aims to provide the best possible goods and services for the Group at the most advantageous price. We review the independence of the external auditors on an annual basis and a process is also in place to review their effectiveness to ensure that the Group continues to receive an efficient and unbiased service.
Financial expert In January 2003, the Audit committee reviewed the SEC requirements for audit committees financial experts, and, following an indepth assessment, recommended that the boards consider indentifying Sir Richard Giordano, Sir David Clementi, and Andrew Gould as the Audit committees financial experts, to be identified as such in the 2003 Annual report and financial statements, subject to the board satisfying itself that they fulfilled the SEC criteria. At their subsequent meeting, the boards considered each of the above and resolved that they each possessed the requisite experience, appropriately required, to qualify as financial experts.
2003 financial statements We have reviewed and discussed with management the Groups audited financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2003. We have discussed with the external auditors the matters described in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Auditing Standard No. 90, Audit Committee Communications, and in the UK Statement of Auditing Standard No 610, Reporting to those charged with Governance (SAS 610), including their judgments regarding the quality of the Groups accounting principles and underlying estimates. We have discussed with the external auditors their independence, and received and reviewed their written disclosures, as required by the US Independence Standards Boards Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees and SAS 610. Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, we have recommended to the boards of directors that the financial statements referred to above be included in the annual report.
Sir Richard Giordano (Chairman)Sir David ClementiAndrew GouldDavid MayhewLord Tugendhat
Audit committee charter
CompositionThe Audit committee shall comprise three or more non executive directors, at least three of whom shall be independent. The boards will determine each directors independence having regard to any past and present relationships with the Group which, in the opinion of the boards, could influence the directors judgment. All members of the committee shall have a working knowledge of basic finance and accounting practices. At least one member of the committee will have accounting or related financial management expertise, as determined by the boards. A quorum will comprise any two independent directors. The committee may invite members of the management team to attend the meetings and to provide information as necessary.
MeetingsThe committee shall meet not less than four times a year or more frequently as circumstances require. Audit committee minutes will be confirmed at the following meeting of the committee and tabled as soon as practicable at a meeting of the boards. The Groups senior financial management, external auditors and internal auditor shall be available to attend all meetings. As part of its responsibility to foster open communication, the committee should meet with management, the external auditors and the internal auditor, at least annually, to discuss any matters that are best dealt with privately.
ResponsibilitiesThe boards and the external auditors are accountable to shareholders. The Audit committee is accountable to the boards. The internal auditor is accountable to the Audit committee and the finance director. To fulfil its responsibilities the committee shall:
Shareholder information
DIVIDENDSBoth Companies have paid dividends on their shares every year since incorporation in 1962. The rights of Rio Tinto shareholders to receive dividends are explained under the description of the dual listed companies structure on page 77.
Dividend policyThe aim of Rio Tintos progressive dividend policy is to increase the US dollar value of dividends over time, without cutting them during economic downturns. The rate of the total annual dividend, in US dollars, is determined taking into account the results for the past year and the outlook for the current year. The interim dividend is set at one half of the total dividend for the previous year. Under Rio Tintos dividend policy, the final dividend for each year is expected to be at least equal to the interim dividend.
Dividend determinationAs the majority of the Groups sales are transacted in US dollars, it is the most reliable currency in which to measure the Groups financial performance and is its main reporting currency. So the US dollar is the natural currency for dividend determination. Dividends determined in US dollars are translated at exchange rates prevailing two days prior to announcement and are then declared payable in sterling by Rio Tinto plc and in Australian dollars by Rio Tinto Limited. Australian shareholders of Rio Tinto plc can elect to receive dividends in Australian dollars and UK shareholders of Rio Tinto Limited can elect to receive dividends in sterling. If you would like further information contact Computershare.
2003 dividendsThe 2003 interim and final dividends were determined at 30.0 US cents and at 34.0 US cents per share respectively and the applicable translation rates were US$1.6256 and US$1.8202 to the pound sterling and US$0.6664 and US$0.7610 to the Australian dollar. Final dividends of 18.68 pence per share and of 44.68 Australian cents per share will be paid on 6 April 2004. A final dividend of 136 US cents per ADR (each representing four shares) will be paid by The Bank of New York to the ADR holders of both Companies on 7 April 2004. The tables below set out the amounts of interim, final and total cash dividends paid or payable on each share or ADS in respect of each financial year, but before deduction of any withholding tax.
Dividend reinvestment plan (DRP)Rio Tinto offers shareholders a DRP which provides the opportunity to use cash dividends to purchase Rio Tinto shares in the market, free of commission. Please see Taxation on pages 75 and 76 for an explanation of the tax consequences. The DRP is available only to shareholders whose names are recorded on the respective Companys register and due to local legislation cannot be extended to shareholders in the US, Canada and certain other countries. Please contact Computershare for further information.
MARKET LISTINGS AND SHARE PRICESRio Tinto plcThe principal market for Rio Tinto plc shares is the London Stock Exchange (LSE). As a constituent of the Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 index (FTSE 100), Rio Tinto plc shares trade through the Stock Exchange Electronic Trading Service (SETS) system. Central to the SETS system is the electronic order book on which an LSE member firm can post buy and sell orders, either on its own behalf or for its clients. Buy and sell orders are executed against each other automatically in strict price, then size, priority. The order book operates from 8.00 am to 4.30 pm daily. From 7.50 am to 8.00 am orders may be added to, or deleted from the book, but execution does not occur. At 8.00 am the market opens by means of an uncrossing algorithm which calculates the greatest volume of trades on the book which can be executed, then matches the orders, leaving unexecuted orders on the book at the start of trading. All orders placed on the order book are firm, and are for standard three day settlement. While the order book is vital to all market participants, orders are anonymous, with the counterparties being revealed to each other only after execution of the trade. Use of the order book is not mandatory but all trades, regardless of size, executed over the SETS system are published immediately. The only exception to this is where a Worked Principal Agreement (WPA)
is entered into for trades greater than 8 x Normal Market Size (NMS). Rio Tinto plc has an NMS of 75,000 shares. Publication of trades entered under a WPA is delayed until the earlier of 80 per cent of the risk position assumed by the member firm taking on the trade being unwound or the end of the business day. Closing LSE share prices are published in most UK national newspapers and are also available during the day on the Rio Tinto and other websites. Share prices are also available on CEEFAX and TELETEXT and can be obtained through the Cityline service operated by the Financial Times in the UK: telephone 0906 843 3880; calls are currently charged at 60p per minute. Rio Tinto plc has a sponsored American Depositary Receipt (ADR) facility with The Bank of New York under a Deposit Agreement, dated 13 July 1988, as amended on 11 June 1990, and as further amended and restated on 15 February 1999. The ADRs evidence Rio Tinto plc American Depositary Shares (ADS), with each ADR representing four ordinary shares. The shares are registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and are traded under the symbol RTP. Rio Tinto plc shares are also listed on Euronext and on Deutsche Börse.The following table shows share prices for the period indicated, the reported high and low middle market quotations (which represent an average of bid and asked prices) for Rio Tinto plcs shares on the LSE based on the LSE Daily Official List, and the highest and lowest sale prices of the Rio Tinto plc ADSs as reported on the NYSE composite tape.
As at 6 February 2004, there were 66,906 holders of record of Rio Tinto plcs shares. Of these holders, 254 had registered addresses in the US and held a total of 158,205 Rio Tinto plc shares, representing 0.01 per cent of the total number of Rio Tinto plc shares issued and outstanding as at such date. In addition, 82.8 million Rio Tinto plc
shares were registered in the name of a custodian account in London. These shares were represented by 20.7 million Rio Tinto plc ADSs held of record by 373 ADS holders. In addition, certain accounts of record with registered addresses other than in the US hold shares, in whole or in part, beneficially for US persons.
Rio Tinto LimitedRio Tinto Limited shares are listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) and the Stock Exchange of New Zealand. The ASX is the principal trading market for Rio Tinto Limited shares. The ASX is a national stock exchange operating in the capital city of each Australian State with an automated trading system. Although not listed, Rio Tinto Limited shares are also traded on the LSE. Closing ASX share prices are published in most Australian newspapers and are also available during the day on the Rio Tinto and other websites. Rio Tinto Limited also has an ADR facility with The Bank of New York under a Deposit Agreement, dated 6 June 1989, as amended on 1 August 1989, and as amended and restated on 2 June 1992. The ADRs evidence Rio Tinto Limiteds ADSs, each representing four shares and are traded in the over the counter market under the symbol RTOLY. The following tables set out for the periods indicated the high and low closing sale prices of Rio Tinto Limited shares based upon information provided by the ASX and the highest and lowest trading prices of Rio Tinto Limited ADSs, as advised by The Bank of New York. There is no established trading market in the US for Rio Tinto Limiteds shares or ADSs.
As at 6 February 2004, a total of 304,153 Rio Tinto Limited shares were held of record by 208 persons with registered addresses in the US, which represented approximately 0.061 per cent of the total number of Rio Tinto Limited shares issued and outstanding as of such date. In addition, an aggregate of 234,778 Rio Tinto Limited ADSs were outstanding (representing 0.9 million Rio Tinto Limited shares) and were held of
record by 31 persons with registered addresses in the US, which represented less than one per cent of the total number of Rio Tinto Limited shares issued and outstanding. In addition, nominee accounts of record with registered addresses other than in the US may hold Rio Tinto Limited shares, in whole or in part, beneficially for US persons.
ADR holdersADR holders may instruct The Bank of New York as to how the shares represented by their ADRs should be voted. Registered holders of ADRs will have the Annual review and interim reports mailed to them at their record address. Brokers or financial institutions, which hold ADRs for shareholder clients, are responsible for forwarding shareholder information to their clients and will be provided with copies of the Annual review and interim reports for this purpose. Rio Tinto is subject to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reporting requirements for foreign companies. A Form 20-F, incorporating by reference most of the information in the 2003 Annual report and financial statements, will be filed with the SEC. The Form 20-F corresponds to the Form-10K which US public companies are required to file with the SEC. Rio Tintos Form 20-F and other filings can be viewed on the SEC website at www.sec.gov
Investment warningPast performance of shares is not necessarily a guide to future performance. The value of investments and any income from them is not guaranteed and can fall as well as rise depending on market movements. You may not get back the original amount invested.
Credit ratingsRio Tinto has strong international credit ratings:
The ratings by Standard & Poors Corporation were downgraded during 2002 from A-1+/AA- and are on a stable outlook. The ratings by Moodys Investor Services are on a negative outlook.
TAXATIONUK resident individualsTaxation of dividendsDividends carry a tax credit equal to one ninth of the dividend. Individuals who are not liable to income tax at the higher rate will have no further tax to pay. Higher rate tax payers are liable to tax on UK dividends at 32.5 per cent which, after taking account of the tax credit, produces a further tax liability of 25 per cent of the dividend received.
Reclaiming income tax on dividendsTax credits on dividends are no longer
reclaimable. However, tax credits on dividends paid into Personal Equity Plans or Individual Savings Accounts will continue to be refunded on dividends paid prior to 6 April 2004.
Dividend reinvestment plan (DRP)The taxation effect of participation in the DRP will depend on individual circumstances. Shareholders will generally be liable for tax on dividends reinvested in the DRP on the same basis as if they had received the cash and arranged the investment. The dividend should therefore be included in the annual tax return in the normal way. The shares acquired should be added to shareholdings at the date and at the net cost shown on the share purchase advice. The actual cost of the shares (for Rio Tinto plc shareholders including the stamp duty/stamp duty reserve tax) will form the base cost for capital gains tax purposes.
Capital gains taxShareholders who have any queries on capital gains tax issues are advised to consult their financial adviser. A leaflet which includes details of relevant events since 31 March 1982 and provides adjusted values for Rio Tinto plc securities as at that date is available from the company secretary.
Australian resident individualsTaxation of dividendsThe basis of the Australian dividend imputation system is that when Australian resident shareholders receive dividends from Rio Tinto Limited, they may be entitled to a credit for the tax paid by the Group in respect of that income, depending on the tax status of the shareholder. The application of the system results in tax paid by the Group being allocated to shareholders by way of franking credits attaching to the dividends they receive. Such dividends are known as franked dividends. A dividend may be partly or fully franked. The current Rio Tinto Limited dividend is fully franked and the franking credits attached to the dividend are shown in the distribution statement provided to shareholders. The extent to which a company will frank a dividend depends on the credit balance in its franking account. Credits to this account can arise in a number of ways, including when a company pays company tax or receives a franked dividend from another company. The dividend is required to be included in a resident individual shareholders assessable income. In addition, an amount equal to the franking credit attached to the franked dividend is also included in the assessable income of the resident individual, who may then be entitled to a rebate of tax equal to the franking credit amount included in their income. The effect of the dividend imputation system on non resident shareholders is that, to the extent that the dividend is franked, no
Shareholder information continued
Australian tax will be payable and there is an exemption from dividend withholding tax. A withholding tax is normally levied at the rate of 15 per cent when unfranked dividends are paid to residents of countries with which Australia has a taxation treaty. Most Western countries have a taxation treaty with Australia. A rate of 30 per cent applies to countries where there is no taxation treaty. Since 1988, all dividends paid by Rio Tinto Limited have been fully franked. It is the Groups policy to pay fully franked dividends whenever possible.
Dividend reinvestment plan (DRP)Shareholders will generally be liable for tax on dividends reinvested in the DRP on the same basis as if they had received the cash and arranged the investment. The dividend should therefore be included in the annual tax return in the normal way. The shares acquired should be added to the shareholding at the date of acquisition at the actual cost of the shares, which is the amount of the dividend applied by the shareholder to acquire shares and any incidental costs associated with the acquisition, including stamp duty, will form part of the cost base or reduced cost base of the shares for capital gains tax purposes.
Capital gains taxThe Australian capital gains tax legislation is complex. Shareholders are advised to seek the advice of an independent taxation consultant on any possible capital gains tax exposure. If shareholders have acquired shares after 19 September 1985 they may be subject to capital gains tax on the disposal of those shares.
US resident individualsThe following is a summary of the principal UK tax, Australian tax and US Federal income tax consequences of the ownership of Rio Tinto plc ADSs, Rio Tinto plc shares, Rio Tinto Limited ADSs and Rio Tinto Limited shares (the Groups ADSs and Shares) by a US holder (as defined below). It is not intended to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that are relevant to all classes of taxpayer. Future changes in legislation, may affect the tax consequences of the ownership of the Groups ADSs and shares. It is based in part on representations by The Bank of New York as Depositary for the ADRs evidencing the ADSs and assumes that each obligation in the deposit agreements will be performed in accordance with its terms. A US holder is a beneficial owner of securities who, for purposes of the income tax conventions between the US and both the UK and Australia (the Conventions), is a resident of the US and is not a US corporation owning directly or indirectly ten per cent or more of the stock issued by either of the Companies. For the purposes of the Conventions and
of the US Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the Code) US holders of ADSs are treated as the owners of the underlying shares. The summary describes the treatment applicable under the Conventions in force at the date of this report.
UK taxation of shareholdings inRio Tinto plcTaxation of dividendsUS holders do not suffer deductions of UK withholding tax on dividends paid by Rio Tinto plc. Dividends carry a tax credit equal to one ninth of the net dividend, or ten per cent of the net dividend plus the tax credit. The tax credit is not repayable to US holders.
Capital gainsA US holder will not normally be liable to UK tax on capital gains realised on the disposition of Rio Tinto plc ADSs or shares unless the holder carries on a trade, profession or vocation in the UK through a permanent establishment in the UK and the ADSs or shares have been used for the purposes of the trade, profession or vocation or are acquired, held or used for the purposes of such a permanent establishment.
Inheritance taxUnder the UK Estate Tax Treaty a US holder, who is domiciled in the US and is not a national of the UK, will not be subject to UK inheritance tax upon the holders death or on a transfer during the holders lifetime unless the ADSs and shares form part of the business property of a permanent establishment in the UK or pertain to a fixed base situated in the UK used in the performance of independent personal services. In the exceptional case where ADSs or shares are subject both to UK inheritance tax and to US Federal gift or estate tax, the UK Estate Tax Treaty generally provides for tax payments to be relieved in accordance with the priority rules set out in the Treaty.
Stamp duty and stamp duty reserve taxTransfers of Rio Tinto plc ADSs will not be subject to UK stamp duty provided that the transfer instrument is not executed in, and at all times remains outside of, the UK. Purchases of Rio Tinto plc shares are subject either to stamp duty at a rate of 50 pence per £100 or to stamp duty reserve tax (SDRT) at a rate of 0.5 per cent. Conversions of Rio Tinto plc shares into Rio Tinto plc ADSs will be subject to additional SDRT at a rate of 1.5 per cent on all transfers to the Depositary or its nominee.
Australian taxation of shareholdings inRio Tinto LimitedTaxation of dividendsUS holders are not normally liable toAustralian withholding tax on dividends paid by Rio Tinto Limited because such dividends are normally fully franked under the
Australian dividend imputation system, meaning that they are paid out of income that has borne Australian income tax. Any unfranked dividends would suffer Australian withholding tax which under the Australian income tax convention is limited to 15 per cent of the gross dividend.
Capital gainsUS holders are not normally subject to any Australian tax on the disposal of Rio Tinto Limited ADSs or shares unless they have been used in carrying on a trade or business wholly or partly through a permanent establishment in Australia, or the gain is in the nature of income sourced in Australia.
Gift, estate and inheritance taxAustralia does not impose any gift, estate or inheritance taxes in relation to gifts of shares or upon the death of a shareholder.
Stamp dutyAn issue or transfer of Rio Tinto Limited ADSs or a transfer of Rio Tinto Limited shares does not require the payment of Australian stamp duty.
US Federal income taxDividendsDividends on the Groups ADSs and shares will generally be treated as dividend income for purposes of US Federal income tax. In the case of Rio Tinto Limited the income will be the net dividend plus, in the event of a dividend not being fully franked, the withholding tax. Dividend income will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to US corporations. Under the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act 2003, dividends paid by Qualified Foreign Corporations (QFCs) are subject to a maximum rate of income tax of 15 per cent. This maximum rate applies to taxable years beginning after 31 December 2002 and ending before 1 January 2009. Both Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited expect to be QFCs throughout this period. To qualify for the 15 per cent maximum income tax rate on dividends the stock of the QFC must be held for more than 60 days during the 120 day period beginning on the date which is 60 days before the ex dividend date.
EXCHANGE CONTROLSRio Tinto plcAt present, there are no UK foreign exchange controls or other restrictions on the export or import of capital or on the payment of dividends to non resident holders of Rio Tinto plc shares or the conduct of Rio Tinto plcs operations. The Bank of England however upholds international law and maintains financial sanctions against specified terrorist organisations and specific targets related to Burma, Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and Serbia, Iraq and Zimbabwe. There are no restrictions under Rio Tinto plcs memorandum and articles of association
or under English law that limit the right of non resident or foreign owners to hold or vote Rio Tinto plcs shares.
unchanged at 1:1. The Sharing Agreement has provided for this ratio to be revised in specified circumstances where for example certain modifications are made to the share capital of one Company, such as rights issues, bonus issues, share splits and share consolidations, but not to the share capital of the other. Outside these specified circumstances, the Equalisation Ratio can only be altered with the approval of shareholders under the Class Rights Action approval procedure (described under Voting rights). In addition, any adjustments are required to be confirmed by the auditors. One consequence of the DLC merger is that Rio Tinto is subject to a wide range of laws, rules and regulatory review across multiple jurisdictions. Where these rules differ, in many instances it means that Rio Tinto, as a Group, complies with the strictest applicable level. Consistent with the creation of a single combined enterprise under the DLC merger, directors of each Company are to act in the best interests of the shareholders of both Companies (ie in the best interests of Rio Tinto as a whole). Identified areas where there may be a conflict of the interests of the shareholders of each Company must be approved under the Class Rights Actions approval procedure. To ensure that directors of each Company are the same, resolutions to appoint or remove directors must be put to shareholders of both Companies as a joint electorate (a Joint Decision as described under Voting rights) and it is a requirement that a person can only be a director of one Company if the person is also a director of the other Company. So, for example, if a person was removed as a director of one Company, he or she would also cease to be a director of the other.
Dividend rightsThe Sharing Agreement provides for dividends paid on Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shares to be equalised on a net cash basis, that is without taking into account any associated tax credits. Dividends are determined in US dollars and are then, except for ADR holders, translated and paid in sterling and Australian dollars. The Companies are also required to announce and pay their dividends and other distributions as close in time to each other as possible. In the unlikely event that one Company did not have sufficient distributable reserves to pay the equalised dividend (or the equalised capital distribution), it would be entitled to receive a top up payment from the other Company. The top up payment could be made as a dividend on the DLC Dividend Share, on the Equalisation Share (if on issue) or by way of a contractual payment. If the payment of an equalised dividend would contravene the law applicable to one of the Companies then they may depart from the Equalisation Ratio. However should such
a departure occur then the relevant Company will put aside reserves to be held for payment on the relevant shares at a later date. Rio Tinto shareholders have no direct rights to enforce the dividend equalisation provisions of the Sharing Agreement. The DLC Dividend Share can also be utilised to provide the Group with flexibility for internal funds management by allowing dividends to be paid between the two parts of the Group. Such dividend payments are of no economic significance to the shareholders of either Company, as they will have no effect on the Groups overall resources.
Voting rightsIn principle the Sharing Agreement provides for the public shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited to vote as a joint electorate on all matters which affect shareholders of both Companies in similar ways. These are referred to as Joint Decisions. Such Joint Decisions include the creation of new classes of share capital, the appointment or removal of directors and auditors and the receiving of annual financial statements. Joint Decisions are voted on a poll. The Sharing Agreement also provides for the protection of the public shareholders of each Company by treating the shares issued by each Company as if they were separate classes of shares issued by a single company. So decisions that do not affect the shareholders of both Companies equally require the separate approval of the shareholders of both Companies. Matters requiring this approval procedure are referred to as Class Rights Actions and are voted on a poll. Thus, the interests of the shareholders of each Company are protected against decisions which affect them and shareholders in the other company differently by requiring their separate approval. For example, fundamental elements of the DLC merger cannot be changed unless approved by shareholders under the Class Rights Actions approval procedure. Exceptions to these principles can arise in situations such as where legislation requires the separate approval of a decision by the appropriate majority of shareholders in one Company and where approval of the matter by shareholders of the other Company is not required. Where a matter has been expressly categorised as either a Joint Decision or a Class Rights Action, the directors do not have the power to change that categorisation. If a matter falls within both categories, it is treated as a Class Rights Action. In addition, the directors can determine that matters not expressly listed in either category should be put to shareholders for their approval under either procedure. To facilitate the joint voting arrangements each Company has entered into shareholder voting agreements. Each Company has issued a Special Voting Share to a special
purpose company held in trust by a common Trustee. Rio Tinto plc has issued its Special Voting Share (RTP Special Voting Share) to RTL Shareholder SVC and Rio Tinto Limited has issued its Special Voting Share (RTL Special Voting Share) to RTP Shareholder SVC. The total number of votes cast on Joint Decisions by the public shareholders of one Company are voted at the parallel meeting of the other Company. The role of these special purpose companies in achieving this is described below. In exceptional circumstances, certain public shareholders of the Companies can be excluded from voting at the respective Companys general meetings (because they have acquired shares in one Company in excess of a given threshold without making an offer for all the shares in the other Company). If this should occur, the votes cast by these excluded shareholders will be disregarded. Following the Companies general meetings the overall results of the voting on Joint Decisions and the results of voting on separate decisions will be announced to the stock exchanges, published on the Rio Tinto website and advertised in the Financial Times and The Australian newspapers. The results of the 2004 annual general meetings may also be obtained on the appropriate shareholder helpline (Rio Tinto plc: Freephone 0800 435021, and Rio Tinto Limited toll free 1800 813 292).
Rio Tinto plcAt a Rio Tinto plc shareholders meeting at which a Joint Decision will be considered, each Rio Tinto plc share will carry one vote and the holder of its Special Voting Share will have one vote for each vote cast by the public shareholders of Rio Tinto Limited. The holder of the Special Voting Share is required to vote strictly and only in accordance with the votes cast by public shareholders for and against the equivalent resolution at the parallel Rio Tinto Limited shareholders meeting. The holders of Rio Tinto Limited ordinary shares do not actually hold any voting shares in Rio Tinto plc by virtue of their holding in Rio Tinto Limited and cannot enforce the voting arrangements relating to the Special Voting Share.
Rio Tinto LimitedAt a Rio Tinto Limited shareholders meeting at which a Joint Decision will be considered, each Rio Tinto Limited share will carry one vote and, together with the Rio Tinto Limited ordinary shares held by Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Ltd, the holder of its Special Voting Share will carry one vote, for each vote cast by the public shareholders of Rio Tinto plc in their parallel meeting. Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Ltd and the holder of the Special Voting Share are required to vote strictly and only in accordance with the votes cast for and against the equivalent resolution at the parallel Rio Tinto plc shareholders meeting.
The holders of Rio Tinto plc ordinary shares do not actually hold any voting shares in Rio Tinto Limited by virtue of their holding in Rio Tinto plc and cannot enforce the voting arrangements relating to the Special Voting Share.
Capital distribution rights If either of the Companies goes into liquidation, the Sharing Agreement provides for a valuation to be made of the surplus assets of both Companies. If the surplus assets available for distribution by one Company on each of the shares held by its public shareholders exceed the surplus assets available for distribution by the other Company on each of the shares held by its public shareholders then an equalising payment between the two Companies will be made, to the extent permitted by applicable law, such that the amount available for distribution on each Share held by public shareholders of each Company conforms to the Equalisation Ratio. The objective is to ensure that the public shareholders of both Companies have equivalent rights to the assets of the combined Group on a per share basis taking account of the equalisation ratio. The Sharing Agreement does not grant any enforceable rights to the shareholders of either Company upon liquidation of a Company.
Limitations on ownership of shares and merger obligations The laws and regulations of the UK and Australia impose certain restrictions and obligations on persons who control interests in public quoted companies in excess of certain thresholds that, under specific circumstances, include obligations to make a public offer for all of the outstanding issued shares of the relevant company. The threshold applicable to Rio Tinto plc under UK law and regulations is 30 per cent and to Rio Tinto Limited under Australian laws and regulations is 20 per cent. As part of the DLC merger, the memorandum and articles of association of Rio Tinto plc and the constitution of Rio Tinto Limited were amended with the intention of extending these laws and regulations to the combined enterprise and in particular to ensure that a person cannot exercise control over one Company without having made offers to the public shareholders of both Companies. It is consistent with the creation of the single economic enterprise and the equal treatment of the two sets of shareholders, that these laws and regulations should operate in this way. The articles of association of Rio Tinto plc and the constitution of Rio Tinto Limited impose restrictions on any person who controls, directly or indirectly, 20 per cent or more of the votes on a Joint Decision. If, however, such a person only has an interest in Rio Tinto Limited or Rio Tinto plc, then the restrictions will only apply if they control, directly or indirectly, 30 per cent or more
of the votes at that Companys general meetings. If one of the thresholds specified above is breached then, subject to certain limited exceptions and notification by the relevant Company, such persons (i) may not attend or vote at general meetings of the relevant Company; (ii) may not receive dividends or other distributions from the relevant Company; and (iii) may be divested of their interest by the directors of the relevant Company. These restrictions will continue to apply until such persons have either made a public offer for all of the publicly held shares of the other Company or have reduced their controlling interest below the thresholds specified or have acquired through a permitted means at least 50 per cent of the voting rights of all the shares held by the public shareholders of each Company. These provisions are designed to ensure that offers for the publicly held shares of both Companies would be required to avoid the restrictions set forth above, even if the interests which breach the thresholds are only held in one of the Companies. The directors do not have the discretion to exempt a person from the operation of these rules.Under the Sharing Agreement, theCompanies agree to cooperate to enforce the restrictions contained in their articles of association and constitution and also agree that no member of the Rio Tinto Group shall accept a third party offer for Rio Tinto Limited shares unless such acceptance is approved by a Joint Decision of the public shareholders of both Companies.
GuaranteesIn December 1995, each Company entered into a Deed Poll Guarantee in favour of creditors of the other Company. Pursuant to the Deed Poll Guarantees, each Company guaranteed the contractual obligations of the other Company (and the obligations of other persons which are guaranteed by the other Company), subject to certain limited exceptions. Beneficiaries under the Deed Poll Guarantees may make demand upon the guarantor thereunder without first having recourse to the Company or persons whose obligations are being guaranteed. The obligations of the guarantor under each Deed Poll Guarantee expire upon termination of the Sharing Agreement and under other limited circumstances, but only in respect of obligations arising after such termination and, in the case of other limited circumstances, the publication and expiry of due notice. The shareholders of the Companies cannot enforce the provision of the Deed Poll Guarantees.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION General shareholder enquiriesComputershare Investor Services PLC and Computershare Investor Services Pty Limited are the registrars for Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited, respectively. All enquiries
and correspondence concerning shareholdings (other than shares held in ADR form) should be directed to the respective registrar. Their addresses and telephone numbers are given under Useful addresses on the inside back cover. Shareholders should notify Computershare promptly in writing of any change of address. All enquiries concerning shares held in ADR form should be directed to The Bank of New York, whose address and telephone number is also given under Useful addresses. Shareholders can obtain details about their shareholding on the internet. Full details, including how to gain secure access to this personalised enquiry facility, are given on the Computershare website: www.computershare.com
Consolidation of share certificatesIf a certificated shareholding in Rio Tinto plc are represented by several individual shares certificates, they can be replaced by one consolidated certificate; there is no charge for this service. Share certificates should be sent to Computershare together with a letter of instruction.
Share certificates name changeShare certificates in the name of The RTZ Corporation PLC remain valid notwithstanding the name change to Rio Tinto plc in 1997.
Share warrants to bearerAll outstanding share warrants to bearer of Rio Tinto plc have been converted into registered ordinary shares under the terms of a Scheme of Arrangement sanctioned by the Court in 2001. Holders of any outstanding share warrants to bearer should contact the company secretary of Rio Tinto plc for an application form in order to obtain their rights to registered ordinary shares.
Low cost share dealing serviceStocktrade operates the Rio Tinto Low Cost Share Dealing Service which provides a simple telephone facility for buying and selling Rio Tinto plc shares. Basic commission is 0.5 per cent up to £10,000, reducing to 0.2 per cent thereafter (subject to a minimum commission of £15). Further information is available from Stocktrade, a division of Brewin Dolphin Securities which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Their details are given under Useful addresses.
Individual Savings Account (ISA)Stocktrade offers UK residents the opportunity to hold Rio Tinto plc shares in an ISA. Existing PEPs or ISAs may also be transferred to Stocktrade. Further information can be obtained from Stocktrade whose details are given under Useful addresses.
Corporate nominee serviceComputershare in conjunction with Rio Tinto plc, have introduced a corporate nominee
service for private individuals. Further information can be obtained from Computershare.
Publication of financial statementsShareholders wishing to receive the Annual report and financial statements and/or the Annual review in electronic rather than paper form should register their instruction on the Computershare website.
Unsolicited mailRio Tinto is aware that some shareholders have had occasion to complain that outside organisations, for their own purposes, have used information obtained from the Companies share registers. Rio Tinto, like other companies, cannot by law refuse to supply such information provided that the organisation concerned pays the appropriate statutory fee. Shareholders in the UK who wish to stop receiving unsolicited mail should register with The Mailing Preference Service by letter, telephone or through their website.
The Mailing Preference ServiceFreepost 22London W1E 7EZ
Telephone: 020 7291 3310Website: www.mpsonline.org.uk
Rio Tinto on the webRio Tinto maintains a substantial amount of information on its website, including this and previous annual reports, many other publications and links to websites of Group companies.The maintenance and integrity of the Rio Tinto website is the responsibility of the directors. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.
Website: www.riotinto.com
General enquiriesIf you require general information about the Group please contact the External Affairs department. For all other enquiries please contact the relevant company secretary or the share registrar.Full parent entity Financial statements for Rio Tinto Limited are available free of charge from the Rio Tinto Limited company secretary on request. These Financial statements are also available on the Rio Tinto website.
Other disclosures
Major shareholders and related party transactions Major shareholdersAs far as is known, Rio Tinto plc is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or by any government. The Capital Group of Companies Inc. by way of a notice dated 5 February 2004 informed the Company of its interest in 65,148,434 Ordinary shares representing 6.1 per cent of its shares as at 6 February 2004. Rio Tinto plc does not know of any arrangements which may result in a change in its control. As of 6 February 2004, the total amount of the voting securities owned by the directors of Rio Tinto plc as a group was 152,054 Ordinary shares of 10p each representing less than one per cent of the number of shares in issue. As far as is known, Rio Tinto Limited, with the exception of the arrangements for the dual listed companies structure described under Shareholder information on page 77, is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or by any government. As of 6 February 2004, the only person known to Rio Tinto Limited as owning more than five per cent of its shares was Tinto Holdings Australia Pty Limited with 187,439,520 shares, representing 37.5 per cent of its issued capital. Rio Tinto Limited does not know of any arrangements which may result in a change in its control. As of 6 February 2004, the total amount of the voting securities owned by the directors of Rio Tinto Limited as a group was 287,236 shares representing less than one per cent of the number in issue.
Related party transactionsDetails of the Groups material related party transactions are set out in note 38 Related party transactions, on page 122 of the Financial statements. As explained on page 32, the Groups Financial statements show the full extent of the Groups financial commitments including debt and similar exposures. It has never been the Groups practice to engineer financial structures as a way of avoiding disclosure. Substance rather than form is a fundamental principle of Rio Tintos reporting.
Financial information Legal proceedingsNeither Rio Tinto plc nor Rio Tinto Limited nor any of their subsidiaries is a defendant in any proceedings which the directors believe will have a material effect on either Companys financial position and results of operations.
DividendsThe Groups policy on dividend distributions is set out under Shareholder information on page 74.
Post balance sheet eventsThere have been no significant post balance sheet events.
The offer and listingShare prices and details of the markets on which the Groups shares are traded are set out under Shareholder information on page 74.
Additional informationMemorandum and articles of associationThere have been no changes to either Rio Tinto plcs memorandum and articles of association since new articles of association were adopted by Special Resolution passed on 11 April 2002 or to Rio Tinto Limiteds constitution since it was amended by Special Resolution passed on 18 April 2002.
Exchange controlsAt present, there are no exchange controls or other restrictions that affect remittance of the Groups dividends to US residents, but see Shareholder information on page 77 for controls on remittances from Australia to certain specific territories. There are no restrictions under Rio Tinto plcs memorandum and articles of association or under English law that limit the right of non resident or foreign owners to hold or vote its shares. There are also no restrictions under Rio Tinto Limiteds constitution or under Australian law that limit the right of non residents to hold or vote its shares, except under the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975, see Shareholder information on page 77 for details.
TaxationSee Shareholder information on page 75 for information regarding the tax consequences of holding the Groups ADSs and shares by US residents.
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market riskThe Rio Tinto Groups policies for currency, interest rate and commodity price exposures, and the use of derivative financial instruments are discussed in the Financial review on pages 32 to 36. In addition, the Groups quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are set out in note 28 to the Financial statements on pages 111 to 116.
Defaults, dividend arrearages and delinquenciesThere are no defaults, dividend arrearages or delinquencies.
Material modification to the rights of security holders and use of proceedsThere are no material modifications to the rights of security holders.
Controls and proceduresIn designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures of each of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited, the management of each of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited, including their chief executive and finance director, recognised that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and the management of each of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited necessarily was required to apply its judgement in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within each of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited have been detected. The management of each of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited, with the participation of their chief executive and finance director have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(c) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive and finance director of each of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level. There were no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls of each of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited subsequent to the date of their most recent evaluation.
Audit committee financial expertSee Corporate governance on page 72 for information regarding the identification of the Audit committee financial expert.
Code of ethicsThe way we work, Rio Tintos statement of business practice, summarises the Groups principles and policies for all directors and employees. Since the first edition of The way we work in 1997, expectations of corporate responsibilities have increased. Although the Groups values and objectives are unchanged, its responses have evolved and have been further developed and reflected in a revised 2003 edition. The way we work is supported by supplementary guidance documents and applies to all Rio Tinto managed businesses. The way we work and the supplementary guidance documents are discussed more fully under Corporate governance on page 71. They can be viewed on Rio Tintos website: www.riotinto.com and will be provided to any person without charge upon written request received by one of the company secretaries.
Principal accountant fees and servicesAuditors remuneration including audit fees, audit related fees, taxation fees and all other fees have been dealt with in note 37 Auditors remuneration, on page 121 of the Financial statements.
Contents
Profit and loss account Years ended 31 December
Condensed income statement (US GAAP format) Years ended 31 December
Balance sheet At 31 December
(a)
The financial statements on pages 82 to 134 were approved by the directors on 20 February 2004 and signed on their behalf by
Reconciliation with Australian GAAP 31 December
Diluted earnings per share under Australian GAAP are 0.2 US cents (2002: 0.1 US cents) less than the above earnings per share figures.
Exceptional Items Net earnings under United Kingdom generally accepted accounting principles (UK GAAP) include exceptional gains of US$126 million. In 2002 there was an exceptional charge, for asset write downs and environmental remediation, of US$879 million. The concepts of Adjusted earnings and exceptional items do not exist under Australian generally accepted accounting principles (Australian GAAP).
The Groups financial statements have been prepared in accordance with UK GAAP, which differs in certain respects from Australian GAAP. These differences relate principally to the following items, and the effect of each of the adjustments to net earnings and shareholders funds that would be required under Australian GAAP is set out above.
GoodwillFor 1997 and prior years, UK GAAP permitted the write off of purchased goodwill on acquisitions directly against reserves. Under Australian GAAP, goodwill is capitalised and amortised by charges against income over the period during which it is expected to be of benefit, subject to a maximum of 20 years. Goodwill previously written off directly to reserves in the UK GAAP accounts has been reinstated and amortised for the purpose of the reconciliation statements.
For acquisitions in 1998 and subsequent years, goodwill is capitalised under UK GAAP, in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 10. Adjustments are required for Australian GAAP purposes where such capitalised goodwill is amortised over periods exceeding 20 years in the UK GAAP accounts.
TaxationUnder UK GAAP, provision for the taxes arising on remittances of earnings can only be made if the dividends have been accrued or if there is a binding agreement for the distribution of the earnings. Under Australian GAAP, provision must be made for tax arising on expected future remittances of past earnings.
Under UK GAAP, tax benefits associated with goodwill charged directly to reserves, in 1997 and previous years, must be accumulated in the deferred tax provision. This means that the tax benefits are not included in earnings until the related goodwill is charged through the profit and loss account on disposal or closure. For Australian GAAP, no provision is required for such deferred tax because the goodwill that gave rise to these tax benefits was capitalised and gives rise to amortisation charges against profit.
Proposed dividends Under UK GAAP, ordinary dividends are recognised in the financial year in respect of which they are paid. Under Australian GAAP, with effect from 1 January 2003, such dividends are not recognised until they are declared, determined or publicly recommended by the board of directors. Prior to 1 January 2003, Australian GAAP was consistent with UK GAAP.
Statement of total recognised gains and losses Years ended 31 December
Reconciliation of movements in shareholders funds Years ended 31 December
86
Outline of dual listed companies structure and basis of financial statements
The Rio Tinto GroupThese are the financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group (the Group), formed through the merger of economic interests (merger) of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited, and presented by both Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited as their consolidated accounts in accordance with both United Kingdom and Australian legislation and regulations.
The merger involved no change in the legal ownership of any assets of Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited, nor any change in the ownership of any existing shares or securities of Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited, nor the issue of any shares, securities or payment by way of consideration, save for the issue by each company of one special voting share to a trustee company which provides the joint electoral procedure for public shareholders. During 2002, each of the parent companies issued a DLC Dividend Share to facilitate the efficient management of funds within the DLC structure.
Accounting standardsThe financial statements have been drawn up in accordance with United Kingdom accounting standards. The merger of economic interests is accounted for as a merger under FRS 6.
For further details of the ASIC Class Order relief see page 134.
United Kingdom Companies ActIn order to present a true and fair view of the Rio Tinto Group, in accordance with FRS 6, the principles of merger accounting have been adopted. This represents a departure from the provision of the United Kingdom Companies Act 1985 which sets out the conditions for merger accounting based on the assumption that a merger is effected through the issue of equity shares. The main consequence of adopting merger rather than acquisition accounting is that the balance sheet of the merged group includes the assets and liabilities of Rio Tinto Limited at their carrying values prior to the merger, subject to adjustments to achieve uniformity of accounting policies, rather than at their fair values at the date of the merger. In the particular circumstances of the merger, the effect of applying acquisition accounting cannot reasonably be quantified. In order that the financial statements should present a true and fair view, it is necessary to differ from the presentational requirements of the United Kingdom Companies Act 1985 by including amounts attributable to both Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited public shareholders in the capital and reserves shown in the balance sheet and in the profit for the financial year. The Companies Act 1985 would require presentation of the capital and reserves and profit for the year attributable to Rio Tinto Limited public shareholders (set out in note 25) as a minority interest in the financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group. This presentation would not give a true and fair view of the effect of the Sharing Agreement under which the position of all public shareholders is as nearly as possible the same as if they held shares in a single company.
Notes to the 2003 financial statements
1 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
a Basis of preparationThe Groups accounting policies comply with applicable United Kingdom accounting standards and are consistent with last year. As explained in the section headed Outline of dual listed companies structure and basis of financial statements, the accounting policies depart from the requirements of the Companies Act in order to provide a true and fair view of the merger between Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited.
b Basis of consolidationThe financial statements consist of the consolidation of the accounts of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited and their respective subsidiary undertakings (subsidiaries). They are prepared on the historical cost basis. The Groups shares of the assets, liabilities, earnings and reserves of associated undertakings (associates) and joint ventures are included in the Group financial statements using the equity and gross equity accounting methods respectively. The Group consolidates its own share of the assets, liabilities, income and expenditure of joint arrangements that are not entities.
c TurnoverTurnover comprises sales to third parties at invoiced amounts, with most sales being priced ex works, free on board (f.o.b.) or cost, insurance and freight (c.i.f.). A large proportion of Group production is sold under medium to long term contracts and is included in sales when deliveries are made. Gross turnover shown in the profit and loss account includes the Groups share of the turnover of joint ventures and associates. By-product revenues are included in turnover.
d Shipping and handling costsAll shipping and handling costs incurred by the Group are recognised as operating costs. Amounts billed to customers in respect of shipping and handling, where the Group is responsible for the carriage, insurance and freight, are classified as revenue. If, however, the Group is acting solely as an agent, amounts billed to customers are credited to operating costs.
e Currency translationTransactions in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate ruling at the date of transaction or, where foreign currency forward contracts have been arranged, at contractual rates. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at year-end exchange rates, or at a contractual rate if applicable. On consolidation, profit and loss account items are translated into US dollars at average rates of exchange. Balance sheet items are translated into US dollars at year end exchange rates. Certain non United States resident companies, whose functional currency is the US dollar, account in that currency. The Group finances its operations primarily in US dollars and a significant proportion of the Groups US dollar debt is located in subsidiaries having functional currencies other than the US dollar. Exchange gains and losses relating to US dollar debt impact on the profit and loss accounts of such subsidiaries. However, such exchange gains and losses are excluded from the Groups profit and loss account on consolidation, with a corresponding adjustment to reserves. This means that financing in US dollars impacts in a consistent manner on the Groups consolidated accounts irrespective of the functional currency of the particular subsidiary where the debt is located. Exchange differences on the translation of the net operating assets of companies with functional currencies other than the US dollar, less offsetting exchange differences on net debt in currencies other than the US dollar financing those net assets, are dealt with through reserves. All other exchange differences are charged or credited to the profit and loss account in the year in which they arise, except as set out below in note (p) relating to derivative contracts.
f Goodwill and intangible assetsGoodwill represents the difference between the cost of acquisition and the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets arising on acquisitions after 31 December 1997 are capitalised in accordance with FRS 10. These assets are amortised over their useful economic lives, which may exceed 20 years. Amortisation is charged on a straight line or units of production basis as appropriate. In 1997 and previous years, goodwill was eliminated against reserves in the year of acquisition as a matter of accounting policy. Such goodwill was not reinstated on implementation of FRS 10; but on sale or closure of a business, any related goodwill eliminated against reserves is charged to the profit and loss account.
g Exploration and evaluationDuring the initial stage of a project, full provision is made for the costs thereof by charge against profits for the year. Expenditure on a project after it has reached a stage at which there is a high degree of confidence in its viability is carried forward and transferred to tangible fixed assets if the project proceeds. If a project does not prove viable, all irrecoverable costs associated with the project are written off. If an undeveloped project is sold, any gain or loss is included in operating profit, such transactions being a normal part of the Groups activities. Where expenditure is carried forward in respect of a project which may not proceed to commercial development for some time, provision is made against the possibility of non development by charge against profits over a period of up to seven years. When it is decided to proceed with development, any provisions made in previous years are reversed to the extent that the relevant costs are recoverable.
h Tangible fixed assetsThe cost of a tangible fixed asset comprises its purchase price and any costs directly attributable to bringing it into working condition for its intended use. Costs associated with a start up period are capitalised where the asset is available for use but incapable of operating at normal levels without a commissioning period. Net interest before tax payable on borrowings related to construction or development projects is capitalised until the point when substantially all the activities that are necessary to make the asset ready for use are complete.
i Mining properties and leasesOnce a mining project has been established as commercially viable, expenditure other than that on buildings, plant and equipment is capitalised under mining properties and leases together with any amount transferred from exploration and evaluation. Such expenditure is amortised against profits, applying the same principles as for other tangible fixed assets. In open pit mining operations, it is necessary to remove overburden and other waste materials to access mineral deposits. The costs of removing waste materials are referred to as stripping costs. During the development of a mine, before production commences, such costs are capitalised as part of the investment in construction of the mine.
88
Notes to the 2003 financial statements continued
(b)
The exceptional items analysed at the foot of the profit and loss account are added back in arriving at adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per share. In 2003 the exceptional gains total US$126 million, of which US$19 million related to subsidiaries and associates and US$107 million to joint ventures. These gains arose on sales of operations. These transactions did not give rise to a tax charge. The exceptional charges of US$879 million recognised in 2002 comprised provisions of US$763 million for the impairment of asset carrying values and a charge of US$116 million related to environmental remediation works at Kennecott Utah Copper (KUC). Of the impairment charge, US$480 million related to KUC and US$235 million related to the Iron Ore Company of Canada (IOC). Of the total charge, US$16 million before tax related to joint ventures and the remainder to subsidiaries. Most of the 2002 impairment provisions were calculated so as to ensure that the carrying value of the relevant assets were the same as the present value of the expected future cash flows relating to those assets. The discount rates used in calculating the present value of expected future cash flows were derived from the Groups weighted average cost of capital, with appropriate risk adjustments. When adjusted to include inflation and grossed up at the Groups average tax rate for 2002, before exceptional items, the discount rate applied to the relevant income generating units was equivalent to ten per cent, except for gold production for which a rate equivalent to seven per cent was used. The impairment provision against IOC aligned the carrying value with the value negotiated between shareholders during 2002 as part of a financial restructuring exercise.
694
SHORT TERM BORROWINGS
Amounts attributable to Rio Tinto Limited public shareholdersThe consolidated shareholders funds of the DLC include US$2,270 million (2002: US$1,688 million) and profit for the financial year includes US$341 million (2002: US$147 million) attributable to the economic interests of shareholders in Rio Tinto Limited other than Rio Tinto plc.
Except where stated, the information given below relates to the financial instruments of the parent companies and their subsidiaries and excludes joint ventures and associates. The information provided is as at the end of the financial year. Short term debtors and creditors are included only in the currency analysis.
Financial instruments held by companies acquired are marked to market as part of the adjustment of assets and liabilities acquired to fair value. Where appropriate, these fair value adjustments, calculated on a basis consistent with that disclosed in Section E, are shown in the disclosures below.
Of the above, contracts to sell US$540 million were acquired with companies purchased in 2000 and 2001 and US$62 million were entered into by Comalco before it became a wholly owned subsidiary.
As noted above, the following sold A$ put options which were outstanding at 31 December 2003, automatically expired when the Australian dollar strengthened above the pre-determined barrier rate in early January 2004. Details are shown below:
In addition, of the remaining US$39 million net provision for the mark to market of the hedge books held by companies on acquisition in 2000 and 2001, US$9 million matures in 2004, US$29 million in 2005 to 2008 and US$1 million thereafter. There are other financial assets totalling US$145 million, of which US$96 million have no fixed maturity and US$49 million has a maturity greater than one year. In accordance with FRS 4, all commercial paper is classified as short term borrowings, though of the US$1,687 million outstanding at 31 December 2003, US$1,100 million was backed by medium term facilities (2002: commercial paper of US$1,749 million all backed by medium term facilities). Under US and Australian GAAP, the US$1,100 million would be grouped within non current borrowings at 31 December 2003. Further details of available facilities are given below. As at 31 December 2003, a total of US$1,618 million is outstanding under the US$3 billion European Medium Term Notes facility, of which US$70 million is repayable within one year. A US$600 million five year bond was issued in 2003 under the SEC shelf registration. At 31 December 2003, the Group had unutilised standby credit facilities totalling US$2.75 billion. These facilities, which are summarised below, are for back upsupport for the Groups commercial paper programmes and for general corporate purposes:
The carrying values and the fair values of Rio Tintos financial instruments at 31 December are shown in the following table. Fair value is the amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in an arms length transaction between informed and willing parties. Where available, market values have been used to determine fair values. In other cases, fair values have been calculated using quotations from independent financial institutions, or by discounting expected cash flows at prevailing market rates. The fair value of cash, short term borrowings and loans to joint ventures and associates approximates to the carrying value, as a result of their short maturity, or because they carry floating rates of interest.
Unconditional purchase obligationsThe aggregate amount of future payment commitments under unconditional purchase obligations outstanding at 31 December was:
Contingent liabilitiesThe aggregate amount of indemnities and other performance guarantees on which no material loss is expected is US$266 million (2002: US$145 million). In 2002, the Australian Tax Office (ATO) issued assessments of approximately A$500 million (which amount includes penalties and interest) in relation to certain transactions undertaken in 1997 to acquire franking credits. The transactions were conducted based on the Groups considered view of the law prevailing at the time. Subsequently, the law was changed. The Group lodged objections to the assessments and on 26 May 2003 the ATO substantially disallowed those objections. The Group subsequently lodged proceedings in the Federal Court to dispute the assessments. As required by Australian tax law and practice, part payment of the disputed tax assessments was required pending resolution of the dispute. A payment of A$164 million was made, which will be subject to recovery with interest if, as it is believed based on Counsels opinion, the Group is successful in challenging the assessments. Consequently, the amount paid has been recorded as a receivable on the balance sheet (see note 16). As at the year end, the amount of the disputed tax assessments, penalties and interest stood at approximately A$454 million (US$340 million at the year end exchange rate) after tax relief on the general interest charge component.There are a number of legal claims arising from the normal course of business which are currently outstanding against the Group. No material loss to the Group is expected to result from these claims.
The Group has joint control of the above ventures and therefore includes them in its accounts using the gross equity accounting technique.
The references above are explained at the foot of note 34.
35 PURCHASES AND SALES OF SUBSIDIARIES, JOINT ARRANGEMENTS, JOINT VENTURES AND ASSOCIATES
DisposalsThe Group disposed of its 25 per cent interest in Minera Alumbrera Limited, Argentina and the wholly owned Peak Gold, Australia during March 2003; and its 50 per cent interest in Kaltim Prima Coal, Indonesia during October 2003. The profit on disposal of these businesses was US$126 million; this has been classified as an exceptional item and consequently excluded from adjusted earnings at the foot of the profit and loss account. The entire sale proceeds of US$403 million have been included in the cash flow statement within Sales of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates. In 2002, total disposal proceeds for the sale of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates were US$233 million. The Group disposed of the Moura joint venture and Ravensworth and Narama thermal coal complex which were acquired with the Australian coal operations of the Peabody Group in 2001.
AcquisitionsDuring 2003 Kennecott Energy increased its holding in Pegasus Technologies Inc. from 20 per cent to 86 per cent. The transaction gave rise to goodwill of US$20 million. The transaction did not involve any cash consideration. On 6 June 2002, the Group acquired an additional 9.5 per cent interest in reduction lines 1 and 2 at Boyne Smelters at a cost of US$78 million. The Group also increased its interest in Coal & Allied from 72.71 to 75.71 per cent on 17 September 2002, for a consideration of US$29 million. On 20 December 2002, the Group contributed additional equity to IOC, increasing its shareholding from 56.1 to 58.7 per cent.
For 2003, a total of US$4,048,800 (2002: US$5,389,636) was attributable to the highest paid director in respect of the aggregate amounts disclosed in the above table, including gains made on exercise of share options. The accrued pension entitlement for the highest paid director was US$1,158,700 (2002: US$984,000). The aggregate remuneration, including pension contributions and other retirement benefits, incurred by Rio Tinto plc in respect of its directors was US$9,794,000 (2002: US$11,492,000). There were no pension contributions. The aggregate remuneration, including pension contributions and other retirement benefits, incurred by Rio Tinto Limited in respect of its directors was US$5,508,000 (2002: US$6,557,000). The aggregate pension contribution was US$423,938 (2002: US$64,730).During 2003, six directors (2002: seven) accrued retirement benefits under defined benefit arrangements. Shares awarded last year in respect of the FTSE 1997 and MCCP 1999 performance periods vested after the publication of the 2002 Annual report and financial statements and the value of awards provided therein were estimated based on share prices of 1,169p and A$32.52. The actual share prices on 28 February 2003 when the awards vested were 1,268.5p and A$33.35 and the above 2003 figures for long term incentive plans have been adjusted accordingly. Further details are given in the Remuneration report on page 67. Emoluments included in the table above have been translated from local currency at the average rate for the year with the exception of bonus payments, which, together with amounts payable under long term incentive plans for 2003, have been translated at the year end rate. More detailed information concerning directors remuneration, shareholdings and options is shown in the Remuneration report, including Tables 1 to 6, on pages 65 to 69.
38 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Information about material related party transactions of the Rio Tinto Group is set out below:
Subsidiary companies:Details of investments in principal subsidiary companies are disclosed in note 31.
Joint ventures and associates:Information relating to joint ventures and associates can be found in the following notes:Note 4 Exceptional itemsNote 5 Net interest payable and similar chargesNote 6 Amortisation of discountNote 7 Taxation charge for the yearNote 12 Property, plant and equipmentNote 13 Fixed asset investmentsNote 14 Net debt of joint ventures and associatesNote 16 Accounts receivable and prepaymentsNote 19 Accounts payable and accrualsNote 25 Share premium and reservesNote 26 Product analysisNote 27 Geographical analysisNote 30 Average number of employeesNote 32 Principal joint venture interestsNote 33 Principal associatesNote 35 Purchases and sales of subsidiaries, joint arrangements, joint ventures and associates
Information relating to joint arrangements can be found in note 34 Principal joint arrangements.
Pension funds:Information relating to pension fund arrangements is disclosed in note 41.
Directors:Details of directors remuneration are set out in note 36 and in the Remuneration report on pages 60 to 69.
Leighton Holdings Limited (Leighton):In 2001, John Morschel became a director and, subsequently, the chairman of Leighton, Australias largest project development and contracting group. A number of Rio Tinto companies in Australia and Indonesia have, in the ordinary course of their businesses, awarded commercial contracts to subsidiaries of Leighton. The board does not consider the value of these contracts to be material to the business of either Leighton or the Rio Tinto Group. On 22 December 2003, Leighton announced that Mr Morschel would be resigning from the board of Leighton.Mr Morschel is expected to resign by the end of March 2004.
The Panguna mine remains shut down. Access to the mine site has not been possible and an accurate assessment of the condition of the assets cannot be determined. Considerable funding would be required to recommence operations to the level which applied at the time of the mines closure in 1989 and these funding requirements cannot be forecast accurately. The directors do not have access to reliable, verifiable or objective information on BCL and the directors have therefore decided to exclude BCL information from the financial statements. BCL reported a net profit of US$4 million for the financial year (2002: profit of US$2 million). This is based upon actual transactions for the financial year. The aggregate amount of capital and reserves reported by BCL as at 31 December 2003 was US$97 million (2002: US$76 million). The Group owns 214,887,966 shares in BCL, representing 53.6 per cent of the issued share capital. The investment of US$195 million was fully provided against in 1991. At 31 December 2003, the market value of the shareholding in BCL was US$39 million.
Other informationA triennial actuarial valuation of the Groups UK plan was made at 31 March 2003 using the projected unit method. In Australia, whilst Group companies sponsor or subscribe to a number of pension plans, the Rio Tinto Staff Superannuation Fund is the only significant plan. This plan principally contains defined contribution liabilities but also has defined benefit liabilities. Valuations are made at least every three years using the projected unit method, with the latest valuation being as at 30 June 2003. A number of defined benefit pension plans are sponsored by the US entities, typically with separate provision for salaried and hourly paid staff. Valuations are made annually at 1 January using the projected unit method. A number of defined benefit pension plans are sponsored by entities in Canada. Valuations are updated annually using the projected unit method. Other defined benefit plans sponsored by the Group around the world were assessed at various dates during 2001, 2002 and 2003. The above summary is based on the most recent valuation in each case, updated to the appropriate balance sheet date. The expected average remaining service life in the major plans ranges from ten to 17 years with an overall average of 12 years. The Group uses asset values based on market value, but smoothed over a one year period in arriving at its pension costs under SSAP 24. The main pension plans providing purely defined contribution benefits held assets, equal to their liabilities, of US$186 million as at31 December 2003. The Groups contributions to these plans of US$9 million are charged against profits and are included in the Regular cost shown below. The Group also operates a number of unfunded plans, which are included within the deficit and percentage coverage statistics above, measured on a basis consistent with both SSAP 24 and FRS 17.
Profit and loss account effect of pension costs, pre tax and minorities
The variation cost reflects the amortisation of the excess of the pension asset carried in the balance sheet at the beginning of the year over the surplus/(deficit) in the relevant plans calculated on a SSAP 24 valuation basis. The increase in the variation cost in 2003 reflects the reduced surpluses/(increased deficits) of the plans at 1 January 2003 compared to 1 January 2002.
Balance sheet effect of pension assets and liabilities, pre tax and minorities
Post retirement healthcareCertain subsidiaries of the Group, mainly in the US, provide health and life insurance benefits to retired employees and in some cases their beneficiaries and covered dependants. Eligibility for cover is dependent upon certain age and service criteria. These arrangements are unfunded. On 30 September 2003, the unfunded accumulated post retirement benefit obligation and annual cost of accrual of benefits were determined by independent actuaries using the projected unit method. The main financial assumptions were: discount rate 6.1 per cent (at30 September 2002: 6.5 per cent), Medical Trend Rate 11.2 per cent reducing to 4.7 per cent by the year 2011 (at 30 September 2002: initially 8.0 per cent reducing to 5.0 per cent by the year 2009), claims cost based on individual company experience. The assumptions were consistent with those adopted for determining pension costs. At 30 September 2003, which is the measurement date, the unfunded accumulated post retirement benefits obligation (excluding associates and joint ventures) was US$563 million (at 30 September 2002: US$437 million).
Profit and loss account effect of post retirement healthcare costs, pre tax and minorities
The main financial assumptions used for the health care schemes, which are predominantly in the US, were: discount rate: 5.9 per cent (2002: 6.2 per cent, 2001: 7.0 per cent), Medical Trend Rate: 11.5 per cent reducing to 5.0 per cent by the year 2011 (2002: Medical Trend Rate: 8.0 per cent reducing to 5.0 per cent by the year 2009, 2001: Medical Trend Rate: 8.5 per cent reducing to 5.0 per cent by the year 2009), claims cost based on individual company experience.
41 POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS CONTINUED
Scheme assetsThe assets in the pension plans and the contributions made were:
In addition, there were contributions of US$18 million (2002: US$16 million) in respect of unfunded health care schemes in the year. Since these schemes are unfunded, contributions for future years will be equal to benefit payments and therefore cannot be predetermined. In relation to pensions, it is currently expected that there will be no regular employer or employee contributions to the UK plan in 2004. Contributions are made to the main Australian plan according to the recommendation of the plan actuary and are primarily to a mixed defined benefit/defined contribution type arrangement (included in the above figures). In North America, contributions are agreed annually in nominal terms. Additional contributions will be paid in 2004 in the light of the position in the US and Canadian plans. Whilst contributions for 2004 are yet to be determined, the currently expected level of contributions by the Group to the plans in Australia, Canada and the US is expected to be some US$30-US$40 million higher than in 2003. The most recent full valuation of the UK plans was at 31 March 2003. The most recent full valuation of the Australian plans was at 30 June 2003. For both the US and Canadian major plans, the most recent full valuation was at 1 January 2003.
Surpluses/(deficits) in the plansThe following amounts were measured in accordance with FRS 17:
If the above amounts had been recognised in the financial statements, the Groups shareholders funds at 31 December would have been as follows:
Movements in deficit during the yearThe net post retirement deficit under FRS 17 before deferred tax and outside shareholders interests would have moved as follows during 2003:
Amounts which would have been recognised in the profit and loss account and in the STRGL under FRS 17The following amounts would have been included within operating profit under FRS 17:
Employer contributions of US$9 million (2002: US$13 million) for defined contribution arrangements have been included in the above operating charge.
The following amounts would have been included as other net finance (expense)/income under FRS 17:
If the above amounts had been recognised in the financial statements, instead of the SSAP 24 charges, the Groups reported net earnings for 2003 would have increased by US$17 million (2002: decreased by US$15 million).
The following amounts would have been recognised within the STRGL under FRS 17:
The accounts on pages 82 to 134 were approved by the directors on 20 February 2004 and signed on their behalf by:
Financial information by business unit
Australian Corporations Act summary of ASIC class order relief
The combined financial statements must also be audited in accordance with relevant United Kingdom requirements. Rio Tinto Limited must also prepare a directors report which satisfies the content requirements of the Corporations Act (applied on the basis that the consolidated entity for those purposes is the Group). Rio Tinto Limited is also required to comply generally with the lodgement and distribution requirements of the Corporations Act (including timing requirements) in relation to the combined financial statements (including any concise report), the Auditors report and the Directors report.
Rio Tinto Limited is not required to prepare consolidated financial statements for it and its controlled entities. Rio Tinto Limited is required to prepare and lodge parent entity financial statements for itself in respect of each relevant financial year, in accordance with the principles and requirements of Australian GAAP and with Australian dollars as the reporting currency, and to have those statements audited. The statements are not required to be laid before the Companys annual general meeting or distributed to shareholders as a matter of course.
The parent entity financial statements are available for download from the Rio Tinto website at www.riotinto.com. Shareholders may also request a copy free of charge by contacting the Rio Tinto Limited company secretary.
Directors Declaration
The financial statements and notes have been prepared in accordance with applicable United Kingdom law and accounting standards and other relevant financial reporting requirements and in accordance with applicable Australian law.
The financial statements and notes give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Rio Tinto Group, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited at 31 December 2003 and of the profit and cash flows of the Group for the year then ended.
By order of the board
Independent auditors' report
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of the Rio Tinto Group as of 31 December 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated profit and loss statements, cash flow statements and statements of total recognised gains and losses for the years ended 31 December 2003 and 31 December 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Group’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Rio Tinto Group at 31 December 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended 31 December 2003 and 31 December 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom.
Summary financial data in Australian dollars, sterling and US dollars
Supplementary information for United States investors
The Groups financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United Kingdom (UK GAAP), which differ in certain respects from those in the United States (US GAAP). These differences relate principally to the following items, and the effect of each of the adjustments to net earnings and shareholders funds that would be required under US GAAP is set out above.
Supplementary information for United States investors continued
RECONCILIATION WITH US GAAP CONTINUED
GoodwillFor 1997 and prior years, UK GAAP permitted the write off of purchased goodwill on acquisition, directly against reserves. For acquisitions in 1998 and subsequent years, goodwill is capitalised and amortised over its expected useful life under UK GAAP. Under US GAAP, goodwill is capitalised and, until 2001, was amortised by charges against income over the period during which it was expected to be of benefit, subject to a maximum of 40 years. Goodwill previously written off directly to reserves in the UK GAAP financial statements was therefore reinstated and amortised, under US GAAP. From 1 January 2002, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortised under US GAAP but are reviewed annually for impairment under FAS 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill amortisation of US$76 million charged against UK GAAP earnings for 2003 (2002: US$90 million) is added back in the US GAAP reconciliation.
Intangible assets under US GAAPThe implementation of FAS 141 resulted in the reclassification of US$340 million from goodwill to finite lived intangible assets at 1 January 2002. The accumulated cost relating to these intangible assets at 31 December 2003 was US$714 million and accumulated amortisation was US$432 million. The total amortisation expense was US$47 million of which US$16 million is related to the amortisation of goodwill previously written off to reserves under UK GAAP now reclassified as finite lived intangible assets under US GAAP. The remaining US$31 million relates to the amortisation of goodwill included as an asset on the UK GAAP balance sheet but now reclassified as finite lived intangible assets under US GAAP. The estimated amortisation charge relating to intangible assets for each of the next five years is US$47 million.
Exchange differences included in earnings under US GAAPThe Group finances its operations primarily in US dollars and a significant proportion of the Groups US dollar debt is located in its Australian operations. Under UK GAAP, this debt is dealt with in the context of the currency status of the Group as a whole and exchange differences reported by the Australian operations are adjusted through reserves. US GAAP permits such exchange gains and losses to be taken to reserves only to the extent that the US dollar debt hedges US dollar assets in the Australian Group. Exchange gains of US$1,019 million pre tax (2002: US$240 million), US$623 million net of tax and minorities (2002: US$177 million net of tax and minorities), on US dollar debt that do not qualify for hedge accounting under US GAAP have therefore been recorded in US GAAP earnings.
Mark to market of derivative contractsThe Group is party to derivative contracts in respect of some of its future transactions in order to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates against the US dollar. Under UK GAAP, these contracts are accounted for as hedges: gains and losses are deferred and subsequently recognised when the hedged transaction occurs. However, certain of the Groups derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting under FAS 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, principally because the hedge is not located in the entity with the relevant exposure. Unrealised pre tax gains of US$182 million (2002: US$148 million), US$115 million after tax and minorities (2002: US$104 million after tax and minorities), on such derivatives have therefore been recorded in US GAAP earnings. Realised gains of US$105 million pre tax (2002: US$9 million pre tax), US$75 million after tax and minorities (2002: US$6 million after tax and minorities), which have been capitalised under UK GAAP have also been recorded in earnings under US GAAP.
Adjustments to asset carrying valuesFollowing the implementation of FRS 11 in 1998, impairment of fixed assets under UK GAAP is recognised and measured by reference to the discounted cash flows expected to be generated by an income generating unit. Under US GAAP, impairment is recognised only when the anticipated undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying value of the income generating unit. Where an asset is found to be impaired under US GAAP, the amount of such impairment is generally similar under US GAAP to that computed under UK GAAP, except where the US GAAP carrying value includes additional goodwill. Under UK GAAP, impairment provisions may be written back in a future year if the expected recoverable amount of the asset increases. Such write backs of provisions are not permitted under US GAAP. Therefore, any credits to UK GAAP earnings resulting from such write backs are reversed in the reconciliation to US GAAP.
Pensions/post retirement benefitsUnder UK GAAP, post retirement benefits are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Standard Accounting Practice 24. The expected costs under defined benefit arrangements are spread over the service lives of employees entitled to those benefits. Variations from the regular cost are spread on a straight line basis over the expected average remaining service lives of relevant current employees. Under US GAAP, the annual pension cost comprises the estimated cost of benefits accruing in the period adjusted for the amortisation of the surplus arising when FAS 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions, was adopted. The charge is further adjusted to reflect the cost of benefit improvements and any surpluses/deficits that emerge as a result of variances from actuarial assumptions. For US purposes, only those surpluses/deficits outside a ten per cent fluctuation corridor are spread. The reductions in shareholders funds at 31 December 2003 and 2002 also include the effect of the US GAAP requirement to make immediate provision for pension fund deficits through other comprehensive income. The provision reflects the reduction in equity values over recent years. Mandatory implementation of FRS 17, Retirement Benefits, has been delayed until 2005 but additional disclosures are required for 2001 onwards, which are included in note 41 to the financial statements.
Exploration and evaluationUnder UK GAAP, expenditure on a project can be carried forward after it has reached a stage where there is a high degree of confidence in its viability. US GAAP does not allow expenditure to be carried forward unless the viability of the project is supported by a final feasibility study. In addition, under UK GAAP, provisions made against exploration and evaluation in prior years can be reversed when the project proceeds to development, to the extent that the relevant costs are recoverable. US GAAP does not allow such provisions to be reversed.
Share option plansUnder UK GAAP, no cost is accrued where the option scheme applies to all relevant employees and the intention is to satisfy the share options by the issuance of new shares. Under the fair value recognition provisions of FAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the fair value of the options is determined using an option pricing model.
Effect of historical average commodity prices in ore reserve determinationFor UK and Australian reporting, the Groups ore reserve estimates are determined in accordance with the JORC code and are based on forecasts of future commodity prices. During 2003, the SEC formally indicated that, for US reporting, historical price data should be used. The application of historical prices has led to reduced ore reserve quantities for US reporting purposes for certain of the Groups operations, which results in lower earnings for US reporting, largely as a result of higher depreciation charges. Details of the differences in ore reserves used for US reporting are set out on page 147.
Higher cost of sales resulting from acquisition accountingUnder UK GAAP, the inventories of acquired companies are valued at the lower of replacement cost and net realisable value. Under US GAAP, such inventories are recognised at the time of acquisition on the basis of expected net sales proceeds. There is no effect on 2003 earnings.
Provisions for close down and restoration costsFAS 143 Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations has been implemented with effect from 1 January 2003. Under this US standard, provision is made in the accounting period when the related environmental disturbance occurs, based on the net present value of estimated future costs. The costs so recognised are capitalised and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related asset. In each subsequent year, the discount applied to the provision unwinds, resulting in a charge to the profit and loss account for the year and an increase in the present value of the provision. This accounting treatment is broadly similar to Rio Tintos established policy under UK GAAP. Consequently, the pre tax adjustment to the Provision for close down and restoration costs included in the above reconciliation at 31 December 2002 has now been substantially reduced through the cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle.
Start up costsUnder US GAAP, Statement of Position 98-5, Reporting on the Costs of Start up Activities, requires that the costs of start up activities are expensed as incurred. Under UK GAAP, some of these start up costs qualify for capitalisation and are amortised over the economic lives of the relevant assets.
Proposed dividendsUnder UK GAAP, ordinary dividends are recognised in the financial year in respect of which they are paid. Under US GAAP, such dividends are not recognised until they are formally declared by the board of directors or approved by the shareholders.
OtherOther adjustments include amounts relating to differences between UK and US accounting principles in respect of depreciation of mining assets, revenue recognition and unrealised holding gains and losses. Depreciation of mining assets Under UK GAAP, mining assets are fully depreciated over their economic lives or the remaining life of the mine if shorter. In some cases, mineral resources that do not yet have the status of reserves are taken into account in determining depreciation charges, where there is a high degree of confidence that they will be mined economically. For US GAAP, only proven and probable reserves are taken into account in the calculation of depreciation, depletion and amortisation charges. As a result, adjustments have been made to depreciation reducing US GAAP pre tax earnings by US$59 million (2002: US$10 million). Revenue recognition Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101) Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements has the result that, in some cases, sales recorded as revenue under UK GAAP are deferred and are not recognised as revenue under US GAAP until a future accounting period. Occasionally, sales of goods recorded as revenue for UK GAAP purposes may be kept in store by Rio Tinto at the request of the buyer. Under US GAAP, such transactions cannot be recognised as revenue unless the goods are physically segregated from the suppliers other inventory and certain additional criteria are met. In 2003, such timing differences resulted in a reduction in US GAAP pre tax earnings of US$17 million (2002: US$4 million increase). Unrealised holding gains and losses UK GAAP permits current asset investments to be valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Under US GAAP, FAS 115 requires that unrealised holding gains and losses on investments classified as available for sale are reported within a separate component of shareholders funds and excluded from earnings until realised.
TaxationUnder UK GAAP, provision for taxes arising on remittances of earnings can only be made if the dividends have been accrued or if there is a binding agreement for the distribution of the earnings. Under US GAAP, provision must be made for tax arising on expected future remittances of past earnings. Under UK GAAP, deferred tax is not provided in respect of upward fair value adjustments to tangible fixed assets and inventories made on acquisitions. Under US GAAP, deferred tax must be provided on all fair value adjustments to non monetary assets recorded on acquisition with a consequential increase in the amount allocated to mining properties or goodwill as appropriate. Under UK GAAP, tax benefits associated with goodwill charged directly to reserves in 1997 and previous years, must be accumulated in the deferred tax provision. This means that the tax benefits are not included in earnings until the related goodwill is charged through the profit and loss account on disposal or closure. For US GAAP, no provision is required for such deferred tax because the goodwill that gave rise to these tax benefits was capitalised and gives rise to amortisation charges against profit.
Consolidated statement of cash flowsThe consolidated statement of cash flows prepared in accordance with FRS 1 (revised) presents substantially the same information as that required under US GAAP. Under US GAAP, however, there are certain differences from UK GAAP with regard to the classification of items within the cash flow statement and with regard to the definition of cash and cash equivalents. Under US GAAP, tax paid and interest would form part of operating cash flow. Under UK GAAP, cash for the purposes of the cash flow statement is defined as cash in hand and deposits repayable on demand with any qualifying financial institution, less bank borrowings from any qualifying financial institution repayable on demand. Deposits are repayable on demand if they can be withdrawn at any time without notice and without penalty or if a maturity or period of notice of not more than 24 hours or one working day has been agreed. Under US GAAP, cash equivalents comprise cash balances and current asset investments with an original maturity of less than three months and exclude bank borrowings repayable on demand.
Adjusted earningsAs permitted under UK GAAP, adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per share have been presented excluding the impact of exceptional items to provide a measure that reflects the underlying performance of the Group. This is in addition to the presentation of earnings and earnings per share, which include the exceptional items. In accordance with US GAAP, earnings and earnings per share have been presented based on US GAAP earnings, without adjustment for the impact of exceptional items. Such additional measures of underlying performance are not permitted under US GAAP.
Variable Interest EntitiesIn January 2003, the FASB issued interpretation No. 46 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46). Under FIN 46, certain entities labelled Variable Interest Entities (VIE), must be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity. The primary beneficiary is generally defined as the party exposed to the majority of the risks and rewards arising from the VIE. For VIEs in which a significant variable interest is held that is not a majority interest, certain disclosures are required. Full implementation of this interpretation is required in the Groups financial statements for the year to 31 December 2004. The Group has a 20 per cent general partnership interest in the Colowyo limited partnership, which was acquired for US$25 million in December 1994. This joint venture may fall within the definition of a Variable Interest Entity set out in FIN 46. The Colowyo joint venture produces coal, which is sold under long term contracts. Colowyos total sales revenues for 2003 were US$101 million and its total assets as at31 December 2003 were US$100 million. It is included in the Group accounts on the equity accounting basis and the carrying value of the net investment at 31 December 2003 was US$27 million under US GAAP. Colowyo has bonds in issue with outstanding capital of US$163 million at 31 December 2003. These are repayable by instalments up to 2016 with interest at rates between 9.56 per cent and 10.19 per cent per annum. The bonds are to be serviced and repaid exclusively out of the net revenues from certain specified sales contracts relating to coal supplies by Colowyo. The bondholders bear the risks of loss that might arise if the revenues are interrupted due to failure of the purchasers or force majeure. The Rio Tinto Group is responsible under a management contract in which it agreed, for the sole and exclusive benefit of the bondholders, to cause Colowyo to perform its obligations under the specified coal sales contracts.
ADDITIONAL US GAAP CASH FLOW INFORMATIONA summary of Rio Tintos operating, investing and financing activities classified in accordance with US GAAP is presented below:
UNREALISED HOLDING GAINS AND LOSSESThe following table shows the Groups investments in debt and equity securities which are held as available for sale in accordance with FAS 115:
ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIESDuring 2003, the following movements, before tax and minorities, took place in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) and earnings in relation to derivatives:
FIXED ASSET INVESTMENTSThe aggregated profit and loss accounts and balance sheets of equity and gross equity accounted companies on a 100 per cent basis are set out below:
In addition, Escondida, Rio Tintos 30 per cent owned joint venture, defers stripping costs based on the ratio of waste to pounds of copper. The actual stripping ratio for 2003 was 0.1015 (2002: 0.1458). The life of mine stripping ratio for 2003 was 0.1103 (2002: 0.1094). The deferred stripping balance is expected to be fully amortised in 2039.
The weighted average remaining contractual lives of options outstanding at 31 December 2003 for the Rio Tinto plc Share Savings Plan, the Rio Tinto plc Share Option Plan, the Rio Tinto Limited Share Option Plan and the Rio Tinto Limited Share Savings Plan are two, seven, eight and three years respectively. The weighted average fair values of options granted during the year for the Rio Tinto plc Share Savings Plan, the Rio Tinto plc Share Option Plan, the Rio Tinto Limited Share Option Plan and the Rio Tinto Limited Share Savings Plan are £4.20, £2.68, A$6.01 and A$10.90 respectively.
ADDITIONAL SEGMENTAL INFORMATIONThe following supplements segmental information provided elsewhere in this report to provide additional information required under US GAAP.
COVENANTSOf the Rio Tinto Groups medium and long term borrowings of US$3.8 billion, some US$0.8 billion relates to the groups share of non recourse borrowings which are the subject of various financial and general covenants with which the respective borrowers are in compliance.
POST RETIREMENT BENEFITSInformation in respect of the net periodic benefit cost and related obligation determined in accordance with US Statements of FinancialAccounting Standards 87, 106 and 132 is given below. The measurement date used to establish year end asset values and benefit obligations was 30 September 2003. The previous measurement date, used to determine 2003 costs, was 30 September 2002. Benefits under the major pension plans are principally determined by years of service and employee remuneration. The Groups largest defined benefit pension plans are in the UK, Australia and the US and a description of the investment policies and strategies followed is set out below. In the UK and the US, the investment strategy is determined by the pension plan trustee and investment committee respectively, after consulting the company. Agreed investment policies aim to ensure that the objectives are met in a prudent manner, consistent with established guidelines. The investment objectives include generating a return that exceeds consumer price and wage inflation over the long term. Ranges for the proportions to be held in each asset class have been agreed; a substantial proportion of the assets is invested in a spread of domestic and overseas equities, with a smaller proportion in fixed and variable income bonds, cash and, in the US, real estate. Risk is managed in various ways, including identifying investments considered to be unsuitable and placing limits on some types of investment. In particular, the funds are not allowed to invest directly in any Rio Tinto Group compa ny. In Australia, the investments reflect the various defined benefit and defined contribution liabilities and are primarily in Australian and overseas equities and fixed interest stocks. At 30 September 2003, funded pension plans held assets invested in the following proportions:
The split of pension investments at 30 September 2002 is not readily available. However, a summary as at 31 December 2002 is set out in the FRS17 transitional disclosures on page 126. The expected rate of return on pension plan assets is determined as managements best estimate of the long term return of the major asset classes equity, debt, real estate and other weighted by the actual allocation of assets among the categories at the measurement date. Pension plan funding policy is based on annual contributions at a rate that is intended to fund benefits as a level percentage of pay over the working lifetime of a plans participants, subject to local statutory minimum contribution requirements. Details of anticipated contributions in 2004 are set out in the FRS 17 transitional disclosures on page 126. Assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit cost and the end of year benefit obligation for the major pension plans varied between the limits shown below. The average rate for each assumption has been weighted by benefit obligation. The assumptions used to determine the end of year benefit obligation are also used to calculate the following years cost.
The actuarial calculations in respect of the UK plans assume a rate of increase of pensions in payment of 2.6 per cent per annum. This assumption is consistent with the expected rates of return and salary increase assumptions in the respective valuations. Appropriate assumptions were made for plans in other countries. Other post retirement benefits are provided to employees who meet the eligibility requirements, and their beneficiaries and dependants, through unfunded self insurance arrangements. The majority of these plans are for employees in the United States. The plans are non contributory, although some contain an element of cost sharing such as deductibles and co-insurance. The weighted average assumptions used in determining the costs and year end benefit obligation for the major post retirement benefit plans other than pension plans were as below:
Discount rate
The benefit obligation shown above includes an allowance for future salary increases, where applicable; the accumulated benefit obligation does not include this allowance. The accumulated benefit obligations for pension plans at 30 September 2003 amounted to US$3,973 million. At30 September 2002, the corresponding total of accumulated benefit obligations was US$3,025 million. For each plan, where the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of the assets and this deficit is greater than the amount provided, an increase in the provision is charged to other comprehensive income. To the extent that the deficit relates to previous benefit improvements an intangible asset is created which reduces the charge to other comprehensive income.
FUNDED STATUS OF THE GROUPS PRINCIPAL SCHEMES
Effect of Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernisation Act of 2003On 8 December 2003 the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernisation Act of 2003 was signed into law in the US. The Act introduces a prescription drug benefit (Medicare Part D) and a federal subsidy for sponsors of post retirement healthcare plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. Specific guidance on the accounting impact of this Act is pending and therefore, in line with the provisions of FSP FAS 106-1 the figures disclosed in this note for post retirement healthcare do not reflect the effects of the Act on any of the US post retirement healthcare arrangements. When final guidance on accounting for the Act is issued, changes to the post retirement healthcare information disclosed in this note may be required.
ALTERNATIVE ORE RESERVE ESTIMATES FOR US REPORTINGAs a consequence of the US Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) requirement to use historical price data rather than assumptions of future commodity prices, which are the basis of the JORC Code reported numbers on pages 17 to 21, the reserves at certain operations have been amended for SEC reporting purposes only. Material changes are shown below. The ore reserve figures in the following tables are as of 31 December 2003. Metric units are used throughout. The figures used to calculate Rio Tinto's share of reserves are often more precise than the rounded numbers shown in the tables, hence small differences might result if the calculations are repeated using the tabulated figures.
Averagemillrecovery%
Financial summary 1993 2003
Rio Tinto share ownership As at 6 February 2004
Analysis of ordinary shareholders As at 6 February 2004
Definitions
NON MINING DEFINITIONS
Throughout this document, the collective expressions Rio Tinto, Rio Tinto Group and Group are used for convenience only. Depending on the context in which they are used, they mean Rio Tinto plc and/or Rio Tinto Limited and/or one or more of the individual companies in which Rio Tinto plc and/or Rio Tinto Limited directly or indirectly own investments, all of which are separate and distinct legal entities.
Unless the context indicates otherwise, the following terms have the meanings shown below:
Exchange rates The following tables show, for the periods and dates indicated, certain information regarding the exchange rates for the pound sterling and Australian dollar, based on the Noon Buying Rates for pounds sterling and Australian dollars expressed in US dollars per £1.00 and per A$1.00.
Note* The Noon Buying Rate on such dates differed slightly from the rates used in the preparation of Rio Tintos consolidated financial statements as of such date.No representation is made that pound sterling and Australian dollar amounts have been, could have been or could be converted into dollars at the Noon Buying Rate on such dates or at any other dates.
Financial calendar
Publications
The following publications may be obtained from Rio Tinto:2003 Annual report and financial statements 2003 Annual review 2003 Social and environment review highlights The way we work Rio Tintos statement of business practice Review magazine Rio Tintos quarterly magazine for shareholders
The 2003 Databook and the 2003 Social and environment review are available on the Rio Tinto website.
Copies of the 2003 annual reports for the following listed Rio Tinto Group companies are also available on request: Bougainville Copper Limited Coal & Allied Industries Limited Energy Resources of Australia Limited Palabora Mining Company Limited Rio Tinto Zimbabwe Limited
Rio Tinto on the web Information about Rio Tinto is available on our website www.riotinto.com Many of Rio Tintos publications may be downloaded in their entirety from this site and access gained to Group company and other websites.
General enquiries If you require general information about the Group please contact the External Affairs department. For all other enquiries please contact the relevant company secretary or Computershare.
Useful addresses
Cover photography by Tony Waller. Designed by Tor Pettersen & Partners.Printed in England by St Ives Westerham Press to ISO 14001 environmental standards. The paper is manufactured to ISO 14001 environmental standards using fibres from sustainable sources and pulps which are totally chlorine free.Printed in Australia by PMP Print. © Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited.
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the members of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited
We have audited the financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group ("the Group") and of the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Group (see "Accounting Presentation" on page A-7) set out on pages A-2 to A-75, which are expressed in US dollars. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Group's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. As detailed in the statement of accounting policies, the Group changed its accounting policy for deferred tax in 2002 following the adoption of Financial Reporting Standard 19 'Deferred Tax' under generally accepted accounting principles in the United Kingdom.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Auditing Standards generally accepted in the United Kingdom and Auditing Standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion the financial statements set out on pages A-2 to A-75 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Rio Tinto Group and of the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Group at 31 December 2003 and 2002 and their results of operations and cash flows of each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United Kingdom vary in certain significant respects from those generally accepted in the United States of America. The application of the latter would have affected the determination of consolidated net income for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2003 and the determination of consolidated shareholders' funds at 31 December 2003, 2002 and 2001 to the extent summarised in Note 42 to the consolidated financial statements.
A-1
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED
PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED 31 DECEMBER
The separate financial statements for Rio Tinto plc and 100 per cent of Rio Tinto Limited shown above are prepared on the basis of the legal ownership of the various operations within each part of the Group. The distinction between the legal and economic interests represented by Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shareholdings is explained on page A-7. The amounts attributable to the economic interests of Rio Tinto plc shareholders and shareholders of Rio Tinto Limited other than Rio Tinto plc are as follows:
The notes on pages A-7 to A-75 form part of these accounts. Material variations from accounting principles generallyaccepted in the United States are set out on pages A-59 to A-75.
A-2
CONDENSED INCOME STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED 31 DECEMBER (US GAAP format)
A-2(a)
CASH FLOW STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED 31 DECEMBER
A-3
BALANCE SHEETS AT 31 DECEMBER
The separate financial statements for Rio Tinto plc and 100 per cent of Rio Tinto Limited shown above are prepared on the basis of the legal ownership of the various operations within each part of the Group. The distinction between the legal and economic interests represented by Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited shareholdings is explained on page A-7. The amounts of the consolidated shareholders' funds attributable to the economic interests of Rio Tinto plc shareholders and the shareholders of Rio Tinto Limited other than Rio Tinto plc are as follows:
A-4
RECONCILIATION WITH AUSTRALIAN GAAP AT 31 DECEMBER 2003
Net earnings under United Kingdom generally accepted accounting principles ('UK GAAP') include exceptional gains of US$126 million. In 2002 there was an exceptional charge, for asset write downs and environmental remediation, of US$879 million. The concepts of Adjusted earnings and exceptional items do not exist under Australian generally accepted accounting principles ('Australian GAAP').
GoodwillFor 1997 and prior years, UK GAAP permitted the write off of purchased goodwill on acquisitions directly against reserves. Under Australian GAAP, goodwill is capitalised and amortised by charges against income over the period during which it is expected to be of benefit, subject to a maximum of 20 years. Goodwill previously written off directly to reserves in the UK GAAP financial statements has been reinstated and amortised for the purpose of the reconciliation statements.
For acquisitions in 1998 and subsequent years, goodwill is capitalised under UK GAAP, in accordance with Financial Reporting Standard 10 (FRS 10). Adjustments are required for Australian GAAP purposes where such capitalised goodwill is amortised over periods exceeding 20 years in the UK GAAP accounts.
Proposed dividendsUnder UK GAAP, ordinary dividends are recognised in the financial year in respect of which they are paid. Under Australian GAAP, with effect from 1 January 2003, such dividends are not recognised until they are declared, determined or publicly recommended by the Board of directors. Prior to 1 January 2003, Australian GAAP was consistent with UK GAAP.
A-5
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITEDSTATEMENTS OF TOTAL RECOGNISED GAINS AND LOSSESFOR THE YEARS ENDED 31 DECEMBER
RECONCILIATION OF MOVEMENTS IN SHAREHOLDERS' FUNDSFOR YEARS ENDED 31 DECEMBER
A-6
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED OUTLINE OF DUAL LISTED COMPANIES STRUCTURE AND BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Rio Tinto Group Set out on pages A-2 to A-75 are the financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group (the 'Group'), formed through the dual listed companies ('DLC') merger of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited that created a single economic enterprise, together with separate financial statements for the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Group. The financial statements of the Group have been presented by both Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited as their consolidated accounts in accordance with both United Kingdom and Australian legislation and regulations.
Product and geographical analyses of the Group's Operating assets, Turnover, Profit before tax and Net earnings are shown in notes 26 and 27 respectively.
Merger terms On 21 December 1995, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited, which are listed respectively on Stock Exchanges in the United Kingdom and Australia, entered into a dual listed companies ('DLC') merger. This was effected by contractual arrangements between the Companies and amendments to Rio Tinto plc's Memorandum and Articles of Association and Rio Tinto Limited's Constitution.
As a result, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited and their respective groups operate together as a single economic enterprise, with neither assuming a dominant role. In particular, the arrangements:
The merger involved no change in the legal ownership of any assets of Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited, nor any change in the ownership of any existing shares or securities of Rio Tinto plc or Rio Tinto Limited, nor the issue of any shares, securities or payment by way of consideration, save for the issue by each company of one special voting share to a trustee company which provides the joint electoral procedure for public shareholders. During 2002, each of the parent Companies issued a DLC Dividend Share to facilitate the efficient management of funds within the DLC structure.
Accounting presentation Under United Kingdom generally accepted accounting principles, the DLC merger is a business combination that has been accounted for as a merger under FRS 6 on the basis that it has created a single economic enterprise for operating and financial reporting purposes.
For the purposes of its filings in the United States under the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the primary financial statements of the Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited parts of the Group are their separate consolidated financial statements prepared on the basis of the legal ownership of the various operations within each part of the Group. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements for Rio Tinto Limited consolidate Rio Tinto Limited with the Group undertakings under it's legal ownership; and the consolidated financial statements for Rio Tinto plc consolidate Rio Tinto plc with the Group undertakings under it's legal ownership; Rio Tinto Limited is included on an equity basis that reflects Rio Tinto plc's average 37.6 per cent (2002: 37.6 per cent) ownership of Rio Tinto Limited during the year.
The DLC merger between Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited has the effect that their shareholders have substantially the same economic interests as if they held shares in a single enterprise which owned all of the assets of both companies. The Directors therefore consider that the combined financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group provide the most meaningful financial representation of the state of affairs, profit and cash flows.
The financial statements are presented in US dollars as most Group revenues are denominated in US dollars, as are many of the Group's costs. In explaining key features and trends of Group financial performance, the US dollar provides a more consistent view which should correspond more closely to underlying business performance.
A-7
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED OUTLINE OF DUAL LISTED COMPANIES STRUCTUREAND BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Australian Corporations Act The financial statements are drawn up in accordance with an order, under section 340 of the Australian Corporations Act 2001, issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission ('ASIC') on 21 July 2003. The main provisions of the order are that the financial statements are:
For futher details of the ASIC class order relief see page 134 of the 2003 Annual report and financial statements.
United Kingdom Companies Act In order to present a true and fair view of the Rio Tinto Group, in accordance with FRS 6, the principles of merger accounting have been adopted. This represents a departure from the provision of the United Kingdom Companies Act 1985 ('the Companies Act 1985'), which sets out the conditions for merger accounting based on the assumption that a merger is effected through the issue of equity shares.
The main consequence of adopting merger rather than acquisition accounting is that the balance sheet of the merged Group includes the assets and liabilities of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited at their carrying values prior to the merger, subject to adjustments to achieve uniformity of accounting policies, rather than at their fair values at the date of the merger.
In the particular circumstances of the merger, the effect of applying acquisition accounting cannot reasonably be quantified.
In order that the financial statements should present a true and fair view, it is necessary to differ from the presentational requirements of the Companies Act 1985 by including amounts attributable to both Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited public shareholders in the capital and reserves shown in the balance sheet and in the profit for the financial year. The Companies Act 1985 would require presentation of the capital and reserves and profit for the year attributable to Rio Tinto Limited public shareholders (set out on pages A-2 and A-4) as a minority interest in the financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group. This presentation would not give a true and fair view of the effect of the Sharing Agreement under which the position of all public shareholders is as nearly as possible the same as if they held shares in a single company.
A-8
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITEDNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Principal accounting policies
(a) Basis of preparation - FRS 19 - 'Deferred Tax' was adopted in 2002. Prior to the adoption of FRS 19, Rio Tinto provided for deferred tax where, in the opinion of the directors, it was probable that a timing difference would reverse within the foreseeable future. Under FRS 19, full provision is made for deferred taxation on all timing differences that have arisen but not reversed at the balance sheet date, except in limited circumstances.
The balance sheet at 31 December 2001 was restated following the implementation of FRS 19, which reduced shareholders' funds by US$133 million. The effect of the restatement is shown in the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses on page A-6. The restatement also included an increase in deferred tax provisions of US$57 million, an increase in the investment in associates of US$10 million and a reduction of US$86 million in property, plant and equipment. The application of FRS 19 did not impact significantly on net earnings for either 2002 or 2001. Accordingly, prior year earnings were not restated.
The Group's accounting policies comply with applicable UK accounting standards and are consistent with last year. As explained in the section headed Outline of dual listed companies' structure and basis of financial statements, the accounting policies depart from the requirements of the UK Companies Act in order to provide a true and fair view of the merger between Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited.
(b) Basis of consolidation - The financial statements of the Rio Tinto Group consist of the consolidation of the accounts of Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited and their respective subsidiary undertakings ('subsidiaries'). The financial statements of the Rio Tinto plc part of the Group consist of the consolidation of the accounts of Rio Tinto plc and its subsidiaries. Within these financial statements Rio Tinto plc equity accounts for its 37.6 per cent interest in Rio Tinto Limited. The financial statements of the Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group consist of the consolidation of the accounts of Rio Tinto Limited and its subsidiaries.
The Financial statements are prepared on the historical cost basis. The Group's shares of the assets, liabilities, earnings and reserves of associated undertakings ('associates') and joint ventures are included in the Group financial statements using the equity and gross equity accounting methods respectively. The Group consolidates its own share of the assets, liabilities, income and expenditure of joint arrangements that are not entities.
(c) Turnover - Turnover comprises sales to third parties at invoiced amounts, with most sales being priced ex works, free on board (fob) or cost, insurance and freight (cif). A large proportion of Group production is sold under medium to long term contracts and is included in sales when deliveries are made. Gross turnover shown in the profit and loss account includes the Group's share of the turnover of joint ventures and associates. By product revenues are included in turnover.
(d) Shipping and handling costs - All shipping and handling costs incurred by the Group are recognised as operating costs. Amounts billed to customers in respect of shipping and handling, where the Group is responsible for the carriage, insurance and freight, are classified as revenue. If, however, the Group is acting solely as an agent, amounts billed to customers are credited to operating costs.
(e) Currency translation - Transactions in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate ruling at the date of transaction or, where foreign currency forward contracts have been arranged, at contractual rates. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at year end exchange rates, or at a contractual rate if applicable.
On consolidation, profit and loss account items are translated into US dollars at average rates of exchange. Balance sheet items are translated into US dollars at year end exchange rates. Certain non-United States resident companies, whose functional currency is the US dollar, account in that currency.
The Group finances its operations primarily in US dollars and a significant proportion of the Group's US dollar debt is located in subsidiaries having functional currencies other than the US dollar. Exchange gains and losses relating to US dollar debt impact on the profit and loss accounts of such subsidiaries. However, such exchange gains and losses are excluded from the Group's profit and loss account on consolidation, with a corresponding adjustment to reserves. This means that financing in US dollars impacts in a consistent manner on the Group's consolidated accounts irrespective of the functional currency of the particular subsidiary where the debt is located. Exchange differences on the translation of the net operating assets of companies with functional currencies other than the US dollar, less offsetting exchange differences on net debt in currencies other than the US dollar financing those net assets, are dealt with through reserves.
All other exchange differences are charged or credited to the profit and loss account in the year in which they arise, except as set out below in note (p) relating to derivative contracts.
A-9
1 Principal accounting policies (continued)
(f) Goodwill and intangible assets - Goodwill represents the difference between the cost of acquisition and the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets arising on acquisitions after 31 December 1997 are capitalised in accordance with FRS 10. These assets are amortised over their useful economic lives, which may exceed 20 years. Amortisation is charged on a straight line or units of production basis as appropriate. In 1997 and previous years, goodwill was eliminated against reserves in the year of acquisition as a matter of accounting policy. Such goodwill was not reinstated on implementation of FRS 10; but on sale or closure of a business, any related goodwill eliminated against reserves is charged in the profit and loss account.
(g) Exploration and evaluation - During the initial stage of a project, full provision is made in respect of the costs thereof by charge against profits for the year. Expenditure on a project after it has reached a stage at which there is a high degree of confidence in its viability is carried forward and transferred to tangible fixed assets if the project proceeds. If a project does not prove viable, all irrecoverable costs associated with the project are written off. If an undeveloped project is sold, any gain or loss is included in operating profit, such transactions being a normal part of the Group's activities. Where expenditure is carried forward in respect of a project which may not proceed to commercial development for some time, provision is made against the possibility of non-development by charge against profits over a period of up to seven years. When it is decided to proceed with development, any provisions made in previous years are reversed to the extent that the relevant costs are recoverable.
(h) Tangible fixed assets - The cost of a tangible fixed asset comprises its purchase price and any costs directly attributable to bringing it into working condition for its intended use. Costs associated with a start up period are capitalised where the asset is available for use but incapable of operating at normal levels without a commissioning period. Net interest before tax payable on borrowings related to construction or development projects is capitalised until the point when substantially all the activities that are necessary to make the asset ready for the use are complete. Once a mining project has been established as commercially viable, expenditure other than that on buildings, plant and equipment is capitalised under mining properties and leases together with any amount transferred from exploration and evaluation. Such expenditure is amortised against profits, applying the same principles as for other tangible fixed assets.
(i) Deferred Stripping costs - Stripping (i.e. overburden and other waste removal) costs incurred in the development of a mine, before production commences, are capitalised as part of the investment in the construction of the mine and subsequently amortised, generally over the ore production during the life of the operation.
Rio Tinto defers stripping costs incurred during the production stage of its operations for those operations where this is the most appropriate basis for matching revenue and costs, and the effect is material.
The stripping ratio is generally calculated by dividing the tonnage of waste mined by the tonnage of ore mined during the relevant period. The costs to be deferred (or accrued) are those relating to the excess (or shortfall) of the current period stripping ratio compared with that for the life of the mine. The life of mine stripping ratio is based on the proven and probable reserves of the operation.
In some operations, there are distinct periods of new development during the production stage of the mine. These may, for example, relate to a separate ore body or discrete section of the ore body. The new development will be characterised by a major departure from the life of mine stripping ratio. Excess stripping costs during such periods are deferred and subsequently amortised pro-rata, generally to the tonnage of ore mined in the remaining life of the operation.
In operations that experience material fluctuations in the stripping ratio on a year by year basis over the life of the mine, deferred stripping costs are subsequently charged against reported profits to the extent that, in subsequent periods, the stripping ratio falls short of the life of mine stripping ratio.
(j) Depreciation and carrying values of fixed assets - Depreciation of tangible fixed assets is calculated on a straight line or units of production basis, as appropriate. Assets are fully depreciated over their economic lives, or over the remaining life of the mine if shorter. Depreciation rates for the principal assets of the Group vary from two and a half per cent to ten per cent per annum.
Tangible and intangible fixed assets are reviewed for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. In addition, goodwill is reviewed for impairment at the end of the first complete financial year after the relevant acquisition and, where the goodwill is being amortised over a period exceeding 20 years, annually thereafter. When a review for impairment is conducted, the recoverable amount is assessed by reference to the net present value of expected future cash flows of the relevant income generating unit, or disposal value if higher. The discount rate applied is based upon the Group's weighted average cost of capital with appropriate adjustment for the risks associated with the relevant unit. Estimates of future net cash flows are based on ore reserves and mineral resources for which there is a high degree of confidence of economic extraction.
(k) Determination of ore reserves - Rio Tinto estimates its ore reserves and mineral resources based on information compiled by Competent Persons (as defined in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves of September 1999 (the JORC code)). Reserves and, for certain mines, resources determined in this way are used in the calculation of depreciation, amortisation, impairment and close down and restoration costs.
A-10
(l) Provisions for close down and restoration and for environmental clean up costs - Both for close down and restoration and for environmental clean up costs, provision is made in the accounting period when the related environmental disturbance occurs, based on the net present value of estimated future costs.
The amortisation or 'unwinding' of the discount applied in establishing the net present value of provisions is charged to the profit and loss account in each accounting period. The amortisation of the discount is shown as a financing cost rather than as an operating cost.
For close down and restoration costs, which include the dismantling and demolition of infrastructure, removal of residual materials and remediation of disturbed areas, movements in provisions other than the amortisation of the discount, such as those resulting from changes in the cost estimates, lives of operations or discount rates, are capitalised and depreciated over future production.
(m) Inventories - Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost for raw materials and stores is purchase price and for partly processed and saleable products is generally the cost of production, including the appropriate proportion of depreciation and overheads. Inventories are valued on a first in, first out ('FIFO') basis.
(n) Deferred tax - Full provision is made for deferred taxation on all timing differences that have arisen but not reversed at the balance sheet date, except in limited circumstances. The main exceptions are as follows: - Tax payable on the future remittance of the past earnings of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures is provided only to the extent that dividends have been accrued or there is a binding agreement to distribute such past earnings.
Provisions for deferred tax are made in respect of tax benefits related to goodwill that was charged directly to reserves on acquisitions made prior to 1998. Such provisions are released when the related goodwill is charged through the profit and loss account on disposal or closure.Deferred tax balances are not discounted to their present value.
(o) Post retirement benefits - In accordance with SSAP 24, the expected costs of post retirement benefits under defined benefit arrangements are charged to the profit and loss account so as to spread the costs over the service lives of employees entitled to those benefits. Variations from the regular cost are spread on a straight line basis over the expected average remaining service lives of relevant current employees. Costs are assessed in accordance with the advice of qualified actuaries.
(p) Financial instruments - The Group's policy with regard to 'Treasury management and financial instruments' is set out in the Financial review on page 32 of the Annual report and financial statements. When the Group enters into derivative contracts these transactions are designed to reduce exposures related to assets and liabilities, firm commitments or anticipated transactions, and are therefore accounted for as hedges. Amounts receivable and payable in respect of interest rate swaps are recognised as an adjustment to net interest over the life of the contract. Gains or losses on foreign currency forward contracts and currency swaps relating to financial assets and liabilities are matched against the losses or gains on the hedged items, either in the profit and loss account or through reserves as appropriate. Gains and losses on financial instruments relating to firm commitments or anticipated transactions for revenue items are deferred and recognised when the hedged transaction occurs. Gains and losses on financial instruments relating to firm commitments or anticipated transactions for capital expenditure are capitalised and depreciated in line with the underlying asset. The cash flows from these contracts are classified in a manner consistent with the underlying nature of the related transaction.
A-11
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
A-12
A-13
A-14
7 Taxation charge for the year
A-15
A-16
A-17
A-18
A-19
A-20
The cash flow statement analyses additions to joint ventures and associates between the following:-'Funding of Group share of joint ventures' and associates capital expenditure', which reports cash supplied by the Group for the formation of new operating assets whose benefits will be attributable to the Group; and'Other funding of joint ventures and associates' which includes any financial investment in joint ventures and associates that does not have the above characteristics, and all loan repayments.
A-24
A-25
A-26
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - - (continued)
A-27
A-28
A-29
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITEDNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
A-30
A-31
A-32
A-33
A-34
The Group figures on page A-34 include the following amounts for joint ventures:
A-35
A-36
The Group figures shown on page A-36 include the following amounts for joint ventures:
A-37
27 Geographical analysis - Rio Tinto Group (continued)
The Group figures shown on page A-36 include the following amounts for associates:
The Group figures shown above include the following amounts for joint ventures:
A-38
28 Financial Instruments
The Group's policies with regard to currency, interest rate and commodity price exposures, and the use of derivative financial instruments, are discussed in the following sections on pages 34 and 35 of the Financial review included in the Annual report and financial statements:- Exchange rates, reporting currencies and currency exposure- Interest rates- Commodity prices- Treasury management and financial instruments
Financial instruments held by companies acquired are marked to market as part of the adjustment of assets and liabilities acquired to fair value. Where appropriate, these fair value adjustments are shown in the disclosures below.
A) Currency
The Group's material currency derivatives are itemised below:
a) Forward contracts hedging trading transactions
Of the above, contracts to sell US$540 million were acquired with companies purchased in 2000 and 2001 and US$62 million was entered into by Comalco before it became a wholly owned subsidiary.
Buy Canadian dollar: sell US dollar (all of which were acquired with companies purchased in 2000)
A-39
28 Financial Instruments (continued)
b) Options hedging trading transactions The Group acquired a series of bought call options with companies purchased in 2000. The majority of these bought call options are matched at 31 December 2003 by sold puts. The combination of these instruments has a similar effect to forward contracts. In the event that the Australian dollar strengthens above pre-determined levels, the put options are 'knocked-out' i.e. cancelled. During 2003, US$57 million of these sold puts were knocked out and the remainder were knocked out in January 2004.
As noted above, the following sold A$ put options which were outstanding at 31 December 2003, automatically expired when the Australian dollar strengthened above the pre-determined 'barrier' rate in early January 2004. Details are shown below:
c) Forward contracts hedging future capital expenditure
A-40
28 Financial Instruments (continued)e) Currency exposures arising from the Group's net monetary assets/(liabilities)
After taking into account the effect of relevant derivative instruments, almost all the Group's net debt is either denominated in US dollars or in the functional currency of the entity holding the debt. The table below sets out the currency exposures arising from net monetary assets/(liabilities) other than net debt, which are not denominated in the functional currency of the relevant business unit. Gains and losses resulting from such exposures are recorded in the profit and loss account. This table reflects the currency exposures before adjusting for tax and outside interests.
The table below shows the Rio Tinto share of the above currency exposures after tax and outside interests:
B) Interest rates
(i) Financial liabilities and assets including the effect of interest rate and currency swapsThis table analyses the currency and interest rate composition of the Group's financial assets and liabilities:
A-41
(ii) Fixed rate liabilities and assets, presented gross, and interest rate and currency swaps The US$721 million (2002: US$685 million) of fixed rate liabilities shown in (i) above comprise gross liabilities of US$2,716 million (2002: US$2,539 million) less the interest rate swaps of US$1,995 million (2002: US$1,854 million) shown below:
A-42
RIO TINTO PLC - RIO TINTO LIMITED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (continued)
C) Commodities
The Group's material commodity derivatives are itemised below:
D) Liquidity The maturity profile of the Group's net debt is discussed in the Balance Sheet section of the Financial review on page 33 of the Annual report and financial statements.
Financial assets and liabilities are repayable as follows:
In addition, of the remaining US$39 million net provision for the mark to market of the hedge books held by companies acquired in 2000 and 2001, US$9 million matures in 2004, US$29 million in 2005 to 2008 and US$1 million thereafter. There are other financial assets totalling US$145 million of which US$96 million have no fixed maturity and US$49 million which has a maturity greater than one year. In accordance with FRS 4, all commercial paper is classified as short term borrowings, though of the US$1,687 million outstanding at 31 December 2003, US$1,100 million was backed by medium term facilities (2002: commercial paper of US$1,749 million all backed by medium term facilities). Under US and Australian GAAP, the US$1,100 million would be grouped within non-current borrowings at 31 December 2003. Further details of available facilities are given below. As at 31 December 2003, a total of US$1,618 million is outstanding under the US$3 billion European Medium Term Notes facility, of which US$70 million is repayable within one year. A US$600 million five year bond was issued in 2003 under the SEC shelf registration. At 31 December 2003, the Group had unutilised standby credit facilities totalling US$2.75 billion. These facilities, which are summarised below, are for back-up support for the Groups commercial paper programmes and for general corporate purposes:
A-43
E) Fair values of financial instruments The carrying values and the fair values of Rio Tinto's financial instruments at 31 December are shown in the following table. Fair value is the amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in an arm's length transaction between informed and willing parties. Where available, market values have been used to determine fair values. In other cases, fair values have been calculated using quotations from independent financial institutions, or by discounting expected cash flows at prevailing market rates. The fair value of cash, short term borrowings and loans to joint ventures and associates approximates to the carrying value, as a result of their short maturity, or because they carry floating rates of interest.
If Rio Tinto's financial instruments were realised at the fair values shown, tax of US$86 million would become payable (2002: US$37 million recoverable). The maturity of the financial instruments is shown in the notes above.
Gains and losses on hedges Changes in the fair value of derivatives used as hedges of trading transactions, capital expenditure and interest rate exposures, including changes relating to derivatives held by companies acquired during 2000 and 2001, are not recognised in the financial statements until the hedged position matures.
A-44
29 Contingent liabilities and commitments
Included above are operating lease commitments falling due within one year of US$38 million (2002: US$26 million).
Unconditional purchase obligations The aggregate amount of future payment commitments under unconditional purchase obligations outstanding at 31 December was:
A-45
30 Average number of employees
A-46
31 Principal subsidiaries at 31 December 2003
A-47
32 Principal joint venture interests at 31 December 2003
33 Principal associates at 31 December 2003
34 Principal joint arrangements at 31 December 2003
A-48
35 Purchases and sales of subsidiaries, joint arrangements, joint ventures and associates
Disposals The Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group disposed of its 25 per cent interest in Minera Alumbrera Limited, Argentina and the wholly owned Peak Gold, Australia during March 2003; and its 50 per cent interest in Kaltim Prima Coal, Indonesia during October 2003. The profit on disposal of these businesses was US$126 million; this has been classified as an exceptional item and consequently excluded from adjusted earnings within the profit and loss account. The entire sale proceeds of US$403 million have been included within the cash flow statement within 'Sales of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates'.
In 2002, total disposal proceeds for the sale of subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates were US$233 million. The Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group disposed of the Moura joint venture and Ravensworth and Narama thermal coal complex which were acquired with the Australian coal operations of the Peabody Group in 2001.
Acquisitions During 2003 Kennecott Energy, an indirect subsidiary of Rio Tinto plc, increased its holding in Pegasus Technologies Inc. from 20 per cent to 86 per cent. The transaction gave rise to goodwill of US$20 million. The transaction did not involve any cash consideration.
On 6 June 2002, the Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group acquired an additional 9.5 per cent interest in reduction lines 1 and 2 at Boyne Smelters at a cost of US$78 million. The Group also increased its interest in Coal & Allied from 72.71 to 75.71 per cent on 17 September 2002, for a consideration of US$29 million. On 20 December 2002, the Group contributed additional equity to IOC, increasing its shareholding from 56.1 to 58.7 per cent.
35 (a) Post balance sheet events (unaudited) On 22 March 2004, Rio Tinto announced that it had reached agreement with Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc ("FCX") for FCX to acquire for cash all of Rio Tinto's 23,931,100 FCX shares. Futher information regarding this transaction, which is subject to a number of conditions, is set out in item 8 of Form 20-F. The sale of FCX shares does not affect the terms of Rio Tinto's joint venture interest in production from the Grasberg mine which is managed by FCX.
36 Directors' remuneration Aggregate remuneration of the directors of the parent Companies was as follows:
For 2003, a total of US$4,048,800 (2002: US$5,389,636) was attributable to the highest paid director in respect of the aggregate amounts disclosed in the above table, including gains made on exercise of share options. The accrued pension entitlement for the highest paid director was US$1,158,700, (2002: US$984,000).
The aggregate remuneration, including pension contributions and other retirement benefits, incurred by Rio Tinto plc in respect of its directors was US$9,794,000 (2002: US$11,492,000). There were no pension contributions.
The aggregate remuneration, including pension contributions and other retirement benefits, incurred by Rio Tinto Limited in respect of its directors was US$5,508,000 (2002: US$6,557,000). The aggregate pension contribution was US$423,938 (2002: US$64,730).
During 2003, six directors (2002: seven) accrued retirement benefits under defined benefit arrangements.
Shares awarded last year in respect of the FTSE 1997 and MCCP 1999 performance period vested after the publication of the 2002 Annual Report and financial statements and the value of awards provided therein were estimated based on share prices of 1,169p and A$32.52. The actual share prices on 28 February 2003 when the awards vested were 1,268.5p and A$33.35 and the above 2003 figures for long term incentive plans have been adjusted accordingly. Further details are given in the Remuneration report on page 67 of the 2003 Annual report and financial statements.
Emoluments included in the table above have been translated from local currency at the average rate for the year with the exception of bonus payments, which, together with amounts payable under long term incentive plans for 2003, have been translated at the year end rate.
More detailed information concerning directors remuneration, shareholdings and options is shown in the Remuneration report, including Tables 1 to 6, on pages 65 to 69 of the Annual report and financial statements.
A-49
37 Auditors' remuneration
A-50
38 Related party transactions
Subsidiary companies: Details of investments in principal subsidiary companies are disclosed in note 31.
Joint ventures and associates: Information relating to joint ventures and associates can be found in the following notes:
Information relating to joint arrangements can be found in note 34 - Principal joint arrangements.
Pension funds: Information relating to pension fund arrangements is disclosed in note 40.
Directors: Details of directors' remuneration are set out in note 36 and in the remuneration report on pages 60 to 69 of the 2003 Annual Report.
Leighton Holdings Limited (Leighton) In 2001, John Morschel became a director and, subsequently, the chairman of Leighton, Australia's largest project development and contracting group. A number of Rio Tinto companies in Australia and Indonesia have, in the ordinary course of their businesses, awarded commercial contracts to subsidiaries of Leighton. The Board does not consider the value of these contracts to be material to the business of either Leighton or the Rio Tinto Group. On 22 December 2003, Leighton announced that Mr Morschel would be resigning from the board of Leighton. Mr Morschel is expected to resign by the end of March 2004.
Transactions between the Rio Tinto plc part of the Group and the Rio Tinto Limited part of the Group These are eliminated on the consolidation of the Rio Tinto Group. Transactions during the year included the following:
39 Bougainville Copper Limited ('BCL')
The Panguna mine remains shut down. Access to the mine site has not been possible and an accurate assessment of the condition of the assets cannot be determined. Considerable funding would be required to recommence operations to the level which applied at the time of the mine's closure in 1989 and these funding requirements cannot be forecast accurately. The directors do not have access to reliable, verifiable or objective information on BCL and the directors have therefore decided to exclude BCL information from the financial statements. BCL reported a net profit of US$4 million for the financial year (2002: profit of US$2 million, 2001: profit of US$3 million). This is based upon actual transactions for the financial year. The aggregate amount of capital and reserves reported by BCL as at 31 December 2003 was US$97 million (2002: US$76 million). The Group owns 214,887,966 shares in BCL, representing 53.6 per cent of the issued share capital. The investment of US$195 million was fully provided against in 1991. At 31 December 2003, the market value of the shareholding in BCL was US$39 million.
A-51
40 Post retirement benefits
(a) SSAP 24 accounting and disclosure Pensions The Group operates a number of pension plans around the world. Whilst some of these plans are defined contribution, the majority are of the funded defined benefit type, with assets held in separate trustee administered funds. Valuations of these plans are produced and updated annually to 31 December by independent qualified actuaries. Further details regarding the plans are provided in the FRS 17 disclosures in section (b) of this note.
Other information A triennial actuarial valuation of the Group's UK plan was made at 31 March 2003 using the projected unit method. In Australia, whilst Group companies sponsor or subscribe to a number of pension plans, the Rio Tinto Staff Superannuation Fund is the only significant plan. This plan principally contains defined contribution liabilities but also has defined benefit liabilities. Valuations are made at least every three years using the projected unit method, with the latest valuation being as at 30 June 2003. A number of defined benefit pension plans are sponsored by the US entities, typically with separate provision for salaried and hourly paid staff. Valuations are made annually at 1 January using the projected unit method. A number of defined benefit pension plans are sponsored by entities in Canada. Valuations are updated annually using the projected unit method. Other defined benefit plans sponsored by the Group around the world were assessed at various dates during 2001, 2002 and 2003. The above summary is based on the most recent valuation in each case, updated to the appropriate balance sheet date. The expected average remaining service life in the major plans ranges from 10 to 17 years with an overall average of 12 years. The Group uses asset values based on market value, but smoothed over a one year period in arriving at its pension costs under SSAP 24. The main pension plans providing purely defined contribution benefits held assets, equal to their liabilities, of US$186 million as at 31 December 2003. The Group's contributions to these plans, of US$9 million are charged against profits and are included in the 'Regular cost' shown below. The Group also operates a number of unfunded plans, which are included within the deficit and percentage coverage statistics above, measured on a basis consistent with both SSAP 24 and FRS 17.
Profit and loss account - effect of pension costs, pre-tax and minorities
A-52
40 Post retirement benefits (continued)
Balance sheet - effect of pension assets and liabilities, pre-tax and minorities
Post retirement healthcare Certain subsidiaries of the Group, mainly in the US, provide health and life insurance benefits to retired employees and in some cases their beneficiaries and covered dependants. Eligibility for cover is dependent upon certain age and service criteria. These arrangements are unfunded.
On 30 September 2003, the unfunded accumulated post retirement benefit obligation and annual cost of accrual of benefits were determined by independent actuaries using the projected unit method. The main financial assumptions were: discount rate 6.1 per cent (at 30 September 2002: 6.5 per cent), Medical Trend Rate 11.2 per cent reducing to 4.7 per cent by the year 2011 (at 30 September 2002 initially 8.0 per cent reducing to 5.0 per cent by the year 2009), claims cost based on individual company experience. The assumptions were consistent with those adopted for determining pension costs. At 30 September 2003, which is the measurement date, the unfunded accumulated post retirement benefits obligation (excluding associates and joint ventures) was US$563 million (at 30 September 2002: US$437 million).
Profit and loss account - effect of post retirement healthcare costs, pre-tax and minorities
b) FRS 17 Transitional disclosures
FRS 17 - 'Retirement Benefits', which deals with accounting for post retirement benefits, has not been adopted, but additional disclosures are required which are shown below. The standard requires pension deficits, and surpluses to the extent that they are considered recoverable, to be recognised in full. Annual service cost and net financial income on the assets and liabilities of the plans are recognised through earnings. Other fluctuations in the value of the surpluses/deficits are recognised in the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses ('STRGL'). Details of post retirement benefit plan assets and liabilities at 31 December 2003, 2002 and 2001, valued on a projected unit basis in accordance with FRS 17, are set out below:
The main financial assumptions used for the health care schemes, which are predominantly in the US, were: discount rate: 5.9% (2002: 6.2%, 2001: 7%), Medical Trend rate: 11.5% reducing to 5.0% by the year 2011 (2002: Medical Trend rate: 8% reducing to 5% by the year 2009, 2001: Medical Trend Rate 8.5% reducing to 5% by the year 2009), claims cost based on individual company experience.
A-53
*The contributions shown include US$9 million (2002: US$13 million) for defined contribution plans.
In addition, there were contributions of US$18 million (2002: US$16 million) in respect of unfunded health care schemes in the year. Since these schemes are unfunded, contributions for future years will be equal to benefit payments and therefore cannot be pre-determined. In relation to pensions, it is currently expected that there will be no regular employer or employee contributions to the UK plan in 2004. Contributions are made to the main Australian plan according to the recommendation of the plan actuary and are primarily to a mixed defined benefit/defined contribution type arrangement (included in the above figures). In North America, contributions are agreed annually in nominal terms. Additional contributions will be paid in 2004 in the light of the position in the US and Canadian plans. Whilst contributions for 2004 are yet to be determined, the currently expected level of contributions by the Group to the plans in Australia, Canada and the US is expected to be some US$30-40 million higher than in 2003.The most recent full valuation of the UK plans was at 31 March 2003. The most recent full valuation of the Australian plans was at 30 June 2003. For both the US and Canadian major plans, the most recent full valuation was at 1 January 2003.
A-54
Surpluses/(deficits) in the plans The following amounts were measured in accordance with FRS 17:
If the above amounts had been recognised in the financial statements, the Group's shareholders' funds at 31 December would have been as follows:
Movements in surplus/(deficit) during the year The net post retirement deficit under FRS 17 before defered tax and outside shareholders interests would have moved as follows during 2003:
A-55
Amounts which would have been recognised in the profit and loss account and in the STRGL under FRS 17 The following amounts would have been included within operating profit under FRS 17:
If the above amounts had been recognised in the financial statements instead of the SSAP24 charges, the Group's reported net earnings for 2003 would have increased by US$17 million (2002: decreased by US$15 million).
The following amounts would have been recognised within the Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses ('STRGL') under FRS 17:
A-56
41 Rio Tinto financial information by business unit
A - 57
41 Rio Tinto financial information by business unit (continued)
A - 58
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles
Reconciliation with US GAAP
A-59
The Groups financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United Kingdom (‘UK GAAP’), which differ in certain respects from those in the United States ('US GAAP'). These differences relate principally to the following items, and the effect of each of the adjustments to net earnings and shareholders' funds that would be required under US GAAP is set out on this and the preceding page.
Goodwill For 1997 and prior years, UK GAAP permitted the write off of purchased goodwill on acquisition, directly against reserves. For acquisitions in 1998 and subsequent years, goodwill is capitalised and amortised over its expected useful life under UK GAAP. Under US GAAP, goodwill is capitalised and, until 2001, was amortised by charges against income over the period during which it was expected to be of benefit, subject to a maximum of 40 years. Goodwill previously written off directly to reserves in the UK GAAP financial statements was therefore reinstated and amortised, under US GAAP. From 1 January 2002, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortised under US GAAP but are reviewed annually for impairment under FAS 142 'Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets'. Goodwill amortisation of US$76 million charged against UK GAAP earnings for 2003 (2002: US$90 million) is added back in the US GAAP reconciliation. No impairment write-downs were required on the initial introduction of FAS 142.
Intangible assets under US GAAP The implementation of FAS 141 'Business Combinations' resulted in the reclassification of US$340 million from goodwill to finite lived intangible assets at 1 January 2002. The accumulated cost relating to these intangible assets at 31 December 2003 was US$714 million and accumulated amortisation was US$432 million. The total amortisation expense for 2003 was US$47 million of which US$16 million is related to the amortisation of goodwill previously written off to reserves under UK GAAP now reclassified as finite lived intangible assets under US GAAP. The remaining US$31 million relates to the amortisation of goodwill included as an asset on the UK GAAP balance sheet but now reclassified as finite lived intangible assets under US GAAP.The estimated amortisation charge relating to intangible assets for each of the next five years is US$47 million.
Exchange differences included in earnings under US GAAP The Group finances its operations primarily in US dollars and a significant proportion of the Group's US dollar debt is located in its Australian operations. Under UK GAAP, this debt is dealt with in the context of the currency status of the Group as a whole and exchange differences reported by the Australian operations are adjusted through reserves. US GAAP permits such exchange gains and losses to be taken to reserves only to the extent that the US dollar debt hedges US dollar assets in the Australian Group. Exchange gains of the Rio Tinto Group of US$1,019 million pre-tax (2002: gains of US$240 million, 2001: losses of US$216 million), US$623 million net of tax and minorities (2002: US$177 million net of tax and minorities, 2001: US$148 million loss net of tax and minorities), on US dollar debt that do not qualify for hedge accounting under US GAAP have therefore been recorded in US GAAP earnings.
A-60
42 Reconciliation to US Accounting Principles (continued)
Mark to market of derivative contracts The Group is party to derivative contracts in respect of some of its future transactions in order to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates against the US dollar. Under UK GAAP, these contracts are accounted for as hedges: gains and losses are deferred and subsequently recognised when the hedged transaction occurs. Under FAS 133 ' Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities', which applied to Rio Tinto from 1 January 2001, all derivative instruments are included in the balance sheet as assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Certain of the Group's derivative contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting under FAS 133, principally because the hedge is not located in the entity with the relevant exposure. Unrealised pre-tax gains for the Rio Tinto Group of US$182 million (2002: US$148 million), US$115 million after tax and minorities (2002: US$104 million after tax and minorities), on such derivatives have therefore been recorded in US GAAP earnings. Realised gains of US$105 million pre tax (2002: US$9 million pre tax), US$75 million after tax and minorities, (2002: US$6 million after tax and minorities), which have been capitalised under UK GAAP have also been recorded in earnings under US GAAP.
Adjustments to asset carrying values Following the implementation of FRS 11 in 1998, impairment of fixed assets under UK GAAP is recognised and measured by reference to the discounted cash flows expected to be generated by an income generating unit. Under US GAAP, impairment is recognised only when the anticipated undiscounted cash flows are insufficient to recover the carrying value of the income generating unit. Where an asset is found to be impaired under US GAAP, the amount of such impairment is generally similar under US GAAP to that computed under UK GAAP, except where the US GAAP carrying value includes additional goodwill. Under UK GAAP, impairment provisions may be written back in a future year if the expected recoverable amount of the asset increases. Such write backs of provisions are not permitted under US GAAP. Therefore, any credits to UK GAAP earnings resulting from such write backs are reversed in the reconciliation to US GAAP. The adjustment to asset carrying values for the Rio Tinto Group in 2003 under US GAAP, of US$32 million, relates to the reversal of a credit made to UK GAAP earnings on the write back of an impairment provision.
The asset write downs for the Rio Tinto Group in 2002, under US GAAP, include amounts recognised in 2001 under UK GAAP of US$445 million and excludes asset write downs recognised in 2002 under UK GAAP of US$235 million. The 2002 Rio Tinto Group US GAAP asset write downs also include an adjustment for goodwill. The 2002 US GAAP impairment write-down for the Rio Tinto Group was US$1,067 million pre-tax (US$1,060 million net of tax and minorities). This is US$89 million pre-tax (US$297 million net of tax and minorities) above the charge of US$978 million pre-tax (US$763 million net of tax and minorities) included under UK GAAP. The asset write downs for Rio Tinto plc in 2002, under US GAAP, include amounts recognised in 2001 under UK GAAP, of US$445 million. The 2002 Rio Tinto plc asset write downs also include an adjustment for goodwill. The 2002 US GAAP impairment write-down for Rio Tinto plc was US$1,059 million pre-tax (US$1,052 million net of tax and minorities). This is US$420 million pre-tax (US$429 million net of tax and minorities) above the charge of US$639 million pre-tax (US$623 million net of tax and minorities) included under UK GAAP.
The asset write downs for Rio Tinto Limited in 2002, under US GAAP, exclude asset write downs recognised in 2002 under UK GAAP of US$212 million. The 2002 US GAAP impairment write-down for Rio Tinto Limited was US$13 million pre-tax (US$13 million net of tax and minorities). This is US$420 million pre-tax (US$212 million net of tax and minorities) below the charge of US$433 million pre-tax (US$225 million net of tax and minorities) included under UK GAAP. The 2001 US GAAP impairment write-down is US$243 million pre tax for the Rio Tinto Group, US$199 million pre tax for Rio Tinto plc and US$71 million pre tax for Rio Tinto Limited (Rio Tinto Group: US$183 million net of tax and minorities). For the Rio Tinto Group and for Rio Tinto plc this is US$472 million pre-tax (Rio Tinto Group: US$400 million net of tax and minorities) below the charges of US$715 million and US$671 million pre-tax included under UK GAAP for the Rio Tinto Group and Rio Tinto plc respectively (Rio Tinto Group: US$583 million net of tax and minorities). The net difference of US$468 million related to asset write-downs for the Rio Tinto Group and Rio Tinto plc comprises the above US$472 million, offset by US$4 million (Rio Tinto Group: US$3 million net of tax and minorities) of additional current year amortisation related to US GAAP adjustments made in previous years.
Pensions/post retirement benefits Under UK GAAP, post retirement benefits are accounted for in accordance with Statement of Standard Accounting Practice 24. The expected costs under defined benefit arrangements are spread over the service lives of employees entitled to those benefits. Variations from the regular cost are spread on a straight line basis over the expected average remaining service lives of relevant current employees. Under US GAAP, the annual pension cost comprises the estimated cost of benefits accruing in the period adjusted for the amortisation of the surplus arising when FAS 87, 'Employers' Accounting for Pensions', was adopted. The charge is further adjusted to reflect the cost of benefit improvements and any surpluses/deficits that emerge as a result of variances from actuarial assumptions. For US purposes, only those surpluses/deficits outside a ten per cent fluctuation 'corridor' are spread.The reductions in shareholders' funds at 31 December 2003, 2002 and 2001 also include the effect of the US GAAP requirement to make immediate provision for pension fund deficits through other comprehensive income. The provision reflects the reduction in equity values over recent years.Mandatory implementation of FRS 17, 'Retirement Benefits', has been delayed until 2005 but additional disclosures are required for 2001 onwards, which are included in note 14 to the financial statements.
Exploration and evaluation Under UK GAAP, expenditure on a project can be carried forward after it has reached a stage where there is a high degree of confidence in its viability. US GAAP does not allow expenditure to be carried forward unless the viability of the project is supported by a final feasibility study. In addition, under UK GAAP, provisions made against exploration and evaluation in prior years can be reversed when the project proceeds to development, to the extent that the relevant costs are recoverable. US GAAP does not allow such provisions to be reversed.
Share option plans Under UK GAAP, no cost is accrued where the option scheme applies to all relevant employees and the intention is to satisfy the share options by the issuance of new shares. Under the fair value recognition provisions of FAS 123, ' Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation', the fair value of the plans is determined using an option pricing model.
A-61
Effect of historical average commodity prices in ore reserve determination For UK and Australian reporting, the Groups ore reserve estimates are determined in accordance with the JORC code and are based on forecasts of future commodity prices. During 2003, the SEC formally indicated that, for US reporting, historical price data should be used. The application of historical prices has led to reduced ore reserve quantities for US reporting purposes for certain of the Groups operations, which results in lower earnings for US reporting, largely as a result of higher depreciation charges. The reduced ore reserves also had the effect of increasing the present value of the provision for close down costs, which increased the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded on implementation of FAS 143 in the US GAAP reconciliation for 2003.Details of the differences in ore reserves used for US reporting are set out on page A-75.
Provisions for close down and restoration costs FAS 143 'Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations' has been implemented with effect from 1 January 2003. Under this US standard, provision is made in the accounting period when the related environmental disturbance occurs, based on the net present value of estimated future costs. The costs so recognised are capitalised and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related asset. In each subsequent year, the discount applied to the provision 'unwinds', resulting in a charge to the profit and loss account for the year and an increase in the present value of the provision. This accounting treatment is broadly similar to Rio Tinto's established policy under UK GAAP. Consequently, the pre tax adjustment to the 'Provision for close down and restoration costs' included in the above reconciliation at 31 December 2002 has now been substantially reduced through the cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle.
Higher cost of sales resulting from acquisition accounting Under UK GAAP, the inventories of acquired companies are valued at the lower of replacement cost and net realisable value. Under US GAAP, such inventories are recognised at the time of acquisition on the basis of expected net sales proceeds. 2001 earnings are lower under US GAAP as a result of the higher cost of sales relating to inventories that were held at the date of acquisition. There is no effect on 2003 or 2002 earnings.
Start up costs Under US GAAP, Statement of Position 98-5, 'Reporting on the Costs of Start-up Activities', requires that the costs of start up activities are expensed as incurred. Under UK GAAP, some of these start up costs qualify for capitalisation and are amortised over the economic lives of the relevant assets.
Proposed dividends Under UK GAAP, ordinary dividends are recognised in the financial year in respect of which they are paid. Under US GAAP, such dividends are not recognised until they are formally declared by the board of directors or approved by the shareholders.
Other Other adjustments include amounts relating to differences between UK and US accounting principles in respect of depreciation of mining assets, revenue recognition and unrealised holding gains and losses.
Depreciation of mining assets - Under UK GAAP, mining assets are fully depreciated over their economic lives or the remaining life of the mine if shorter. In some cases, mineral resources that do not yet have the status of reserves are taken into account in determining depreciation charges, where there is a high degree of confidence that they will be mined economically. For US GAAP, only 'proven and probable reserves' are taken into account in the calculation of depreciation, depletion and amortisation charges. As a result, adjustments have been made to depreciation reducing Rio Tinto Group US GAAP pre tax earnings by US$59 million (2002: US$10 million, 2001: US$6 million), reducing Rio Tinto Plc pre tax earnings by US$12 million (2002: US$3 million increase, 2001: US$3 million increase) and reducing Rio Tinto Limited pre tax earnings by US$75 million (2002: US$20 million, 2001: US$15 million).
Revenue recognition - Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 ('SAB 101') 'Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements' has the result that, in some cases, sales recorded as revenue under UK GAAP are deferred and are not recognised as revenue under US GAAP until a future accounting period. Occasionally, sales of goods recorded as revenue for UK GAAP purposes may be kept in store by Rio Tinto at the request of the buyer. Under US GAAP, such transactions cannot be recognised as revenue unless the goods are physically segregated from the supplier's other inventory and certain additional criteria are met. In 2003, such timing differences resulted in a reduction in Rio Tinto Group US GAAP pre tax earnings of US$17 million (2002: US$4 million increase, 2001: US$5 million increase). The timing differences reduced Rio Tinto plc pre tax earnings by US$19 million (2002: US$2 million increase, 2001: US$4 million increase); and increased Rio Tinto Ltd's pre tax earnings by US$3 million (2002: US$4 million increase, 2001: US$1 million increase).
Unrealised holding gains and losses - UK GAAP permits current asset investments to be valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Under US GAAP, FAS 115 requires that unrealised holding gains and losses on investments classified as 'available for sale' are reported within a separate component of shareholders' funds and excluded from earnings until realised.
Taxation Under UK GAAP, provision for taxes arising on remittances of earnings can only be made if the dividends have been accrued or if there is a binding agreement for the distribution of the earnings. Under US GAAP, provision must be made for tax arising on expected future remittances of past earnings. Under UK GAAP, deferred tax is not provided in respect of upward fair value adjustments to tangible fixed assets and inventories made on acquisitions. Under US GAAP, deferred tax must be provided on all fair value adjustments to non-monetary assets recorded on acquisition with a consequential increase in the amount allocated to mining properties or goodwill as appropriate. Under UK GAAP, tax benefits associated with goodwill charged directly to reserves in 1997 and previous years, must be accumulated in the deferred tax provision. This means that the tax benefits are not included in earnings until the related goodwill is charged through the profit and loss account on disposal or closure. For US GAAP, no provision is required for such deferred tax because the goodwill that gave rise to these tax benefits was capitalised and gives rise to amortisation charges against profit.
Profit contribution from equity accounted operations Under US GAAP, investments in affiliates are accounted for using the equity method, and the reporting entity's share of the after tax profits and losses of its affiliates is included in the income statement as a single line item. Under UK GAAP, the reporting entity's share of the trading results of its associates and joint ventures is split in the profit and loss account between its share of their operating profits/losses, interest receivable/payable and taxation.The Group's share of the after tax profits and losses of associates and joint ventures is shown in its 'Statement of Total Recognised Gains and Losses'.
A-62
Consolidated statement of cash flows The consolidated statement of cash flows prepared in accordance with FRS 1 (revised) presents substantially the same information as that required under US GAAP. Under US GAAP, however, there are certain differences from UK GAAP with regard to the classification of items within the cash flow statement and with regard to the definition of cash and cash equivalents. Under US GAAP, tax paid and interest would form part of operating cash flow. Similarly, deferred stripping costs which are shown as capital expenditure under UK GAAP are included in operating cash flow for the purposes of the US GAAP cash flow disclosure. Under UK GAAP, cash for the purposes of the cash flow statement is defined as cash in hand and deposits repayable on demand with any qualifying financial institution, less bank borrowings from any qualifying financial institution repayable on demand. Deposits are repayable on demand if they can be withdrawn at any time without notice and without penalty or if a maturity or period of notice of not more than 24 hours or one working day has been agreed. Under US GAAP, cash equivalents comprise cash balances and current asset investments with an original maturity of less than three months and exclude bank borrowings repayable on demand.
Adjusted earnings As permitted under UK GAAP, adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per share have been presented excluding the impact of exceptional items to provide a measure that reflects the underlying performance of the Group. This is in addition to the presentation of earnings and earnings per share, which include the exceptional items. In accordance with US GAAP, earnings and earnings per share have been presented based on US GAAP earnings, without adjustment for the impact of exceptional items. Such additional measures of underlying performance are not permitted under US GAAP.
Guarantor's Accounting Under US GAAP there is a requirement for entities to recognise, upon issue of a guarantee, an initial liability for the fair value, or market value, of the associated obligation with disclosure of that information in its interim and annual financial statements. FIN 45 is effective, on a prospective basis, to guarantees issued or modified after 31 December 2002. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 apply to these accounts and the following information is given in response to these.Note 29 to the financial statements discloses indemnities and other performance guarantees totalling US$266 million on which no material loss is expected. This includes US$19 million relating to the Group's commitment to pay deferred consideration in relation to acquisitions of mining properties in 2002 and previous years. This does not include guarantees of payment of US$266 million entered into by the Group relating to deferred consideration arising from such acquisitions because the deferred consideration has been recognised as a liability within the Group's balance sheet. The disclosure in note 29 also includes guarantees for up to US$140 million relating to the costs of infrastructure financed by certain government authorities, which would be subject to reimbursement by the Group if the facilities are not completed or certain tests relating to the related project are not met. Of the remaining US$107 million disclosed in note 29, US$32 million would be subject to reimbursement by a third party in the event that the Group was required to make payment under the guarantees.In addition to the above, the Group has issued guarantees and indemnities totalling US$652 million relating to its close down, restoration and environmental remediation obligations. These are not disclosed as contingent liabilities because the obligations are included in the amounts recognised in the balance sheet as provisions for liabilities and charges.A Group company has guaranteed that the quality of product from a joint venture in which it participates will be in accordance with agreed specifications. It has also undertaken to make up any shortfalls from minimum ore reserve quantities over the life of the joint venture. Currently, no shortfalls are anticipated.As explained in note 14 to the financial statements, the Group has a partnership interest in the Colowyo Coal Company and has undertaken, via a subsidiary company which entered into a management agreement, to cause the partnership to perform its obligations under certain coal supply contracts. The debt of US$163 million owed by the Colowyo Coal Company is to be serviced and repaid out of the proceeds of these contracts.
Variable Interest Entities In January 2003, the FASB issued interpretation No. 46, 'Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities' (FIN 46). Under FIN 46, certain entities labelled Variable Interest Entities (VIE), must be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity. The primary beneficiary is generally defined as the party exposed to the majority of the risks and rewards arising from the VIE. For VIEs in which a significant variable interest is held that is not a majority interest, certain disclosures are required. Full implementation of this interpretation is required in the Groups financial statements for the year to 31 December 2004.The Group has a 20% general partnership interest in the Colowyo limited partnership, which was acquired for US$25 million in December 1994. This joint venture may fall within the definition of a Variable Interest Entity set out in FIN 46. The Colowyo joint venture produces coal, which is sold under long-term contracts. Colowyos total sales revenues for 2003 were US$101 million and its total assets as at 31 December 2003 were US$100 million. It is included in the Group accounts on the equity accounting basis and the carrying value of the net investment at 31 December 2003 was US$27 million under US GAAP. Colowyo has bonds in issue with outstanding capital of US$163 million at 31 December 2003. These are repayable by instalments up to 2016 with interest at rates between 9.56% and 10.19% per annum. The bonds are to be serviced and repaid exclusively out of the net revenues from certain specified sales contracts relating to coal supplies by Colowyo. The bondholders bear the risks of loss that might arise if the revenues are interrupted due to failure of the purchasers or force majeure. The Rio Tinto Group is responsible under a management contract in which it agreed, for the sole and exclusive benefit of the bondholders, to cause Colowyo to perform its obligations under the specified coal sales contracts.
A-63
Post Retirement benefitsInformation in respect of the net periodic benefit cost and related obligation determined in accordance with US Statements of Financial Accounting Standards 87,106 and 132 is given below.The measurement date used to establish year end asset values and benefit obligations was 30 September 2003. The previous measurement date, used to determine 2003 costs, was 30 September 2002.
Benefits under the major pension plans are principally determined by years of service and employee remuneration. The Groups largest defined benefit pension plans are in the UK, Australia and the US and a description of the investment policies and strategies followed is set out below.
In the UK and the US, the investment strategy is determined by the pension plan trustee and investment committee respectively, after consulting the company. Agreed investment policies aim to ensure that the objectives are met in a prudent manner, consistent with established guidelines. The investment objectives include generating a return that exceeds consumer price and wage inflation over the long term. Ranges for the proportions to be held in each asset class have been agreed; a substantial proportion of the assets is invested in a spread of domestic and overseas equities, with a smaller proportion in fixed and variable income bonds, cash and, in the US, real estate. Risk is managed in various ways, including identifying investments considered to be unsuitable and placing limits on some types of investment. In particular, the funds are not allowed to invest directly in any Rio Tinto Group company.
In Australia, the investments reflect the various defined benefit and defined contribution liabilities and are primarily in Australian and overseas equities and fixed interest stocks.
At 30 September 2003, funded pension plans held assets invested in the following proportions:
The split of pension investments at 30 September 2002 is not readily available. However, a summary as at 31 December 2002 is set out in the FRS17 transitional disclosures on page A-54.
The expected rate of return on pension plan assets is determined as managements best estimate of the long term return of the major asset classes equity, debt, real estate and other weighted by the actual allocation of assets among the categories at the measurement date.
Pension plan funding policy is based on annual contributions at a rate that is intended to fund benefits as a level percentage of pay over the working lifetime of a plans participants, subject to local statutory minimum contribution requirements. Details of anticipated contributions in 2004 are set out in the FRS17 transitional disclosures on page A-54.
Assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit cost and the end of year benefit obligation for the major pension plans varied between the limits shown below. The average rate for each assumption has been weighted by benefit obligation. The assumptions used to determine the end of year benefit obligation are also used to calculate the following years cost.
The actuarial calculations in respect of the UK plans assume a rate of increase of pensions in payment of 2.6 per cent per annum. This assumption is consistent with the expected rates of return and salary increase assumptions in the respective valuations. Appropriate assumptions were made for plans in other countries.
Other post retirement benefits are provided to employees who meet the eligibility requirements, and their beneficiaries and dependants, through unfunded self-insurance arrangements. The majority of these plans are for employees in the United States. The plans are non-contributory, although some contain an element of cost sharing such as deductibles and co-insurance.
The weighted average assumptions used in determining the costs and year end benefit obligation for the major post retirement benefit plans other than pension plans were as below:
A-64
The 2003 pension cost recognised for defined contribution plans, of US$9 million (2002: US$5 million), is included in the above.
A-65
Change in additional minimum liability before tax
Change in benefit obligation
Change in plan assets
A-66
Sensitivity to change in healthcare trend
Changing the healthcare cost trend rates by 1% would result in the following effects:
Effect of Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernisation Act of 2003
In January 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 106-1, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act). This FSP addresses the accounting implications of the newly issued Act to an entity that sponsors a postretirement health care plan that provides prescription drug benefits. This Act, signed into law on 8 December 2003 in the United States, introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of certain retiree health care benefit plans. The FSP includes an election to defer accounting for the implications of this new law until specific authoritative guidance to address the accounting treatment has been issued. As such, as a result of the lack of the existence of such guidance, any measures included in these financial statements of the accumulated post retirement benefit obligation (APBO) or net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the financial statements or accompanying notes do not reflect the effects of the Act on the plan. Authoritative guidance, when issued, could require a change in previously reported information.
A-67
Accumulated foreign currency translation gains and (losses) recorded directly in shareholders' funds under US GAAP
Additional US GAAP cash flow information A summary of Rio Tinto's operating, investing and financing activities classified in accordance with US GAAP is presented below:
The year end cash and cash equivalents position under US GAAP included in the above table reflects both the movement in cash and cash equivalents in the year and the impact of exchange gains and losses in the year.
Deferred tax credit/(charge)
A-68
Fixed asset investments The aggregated profit and loss accounts and balance sheets of equity and gross equity accounted companies on a 100 per cent basis are set out below:
For Rio Tinto plc the above disclosures include 100 per cent of the profit and loss account and balance sheet of Rio Tinto Limited.
Deferred StrippingInformation about the stripping ratios of the Business Units that account for the majority of the deferred stripping balance at 31 December 2003, and year in which deferred stripping is expected to be fully amortised, is set out in the following table:
In addition, Escondida, Rio Tinto's 30 per cent owned joint venture, defers stripping costs based on the ratio of waste to pounds of copper mined. The actual stripping ratio for 2003 was 0.1015 (2002: 0.1458, 2001: 0.1476). The life of mine stripping ratio for 2003 was 0.1103 (2002: 0.1094, 2001: 0.1094). The deferred stripping balance is expected to be fully amortised in 2039.
A-69
Unrealised holding gains and lossesUnder FAS 115, unrealised holding gains and losses on investments classified as 'available for sale' are excluded from earnings and reported within a separate component of shareholders' funds until realised.
The following tables show the investments in debt and equity securities which are held as 'available for sale' in accordance with FAS 115, for the Rio Tinto Group, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited.
Share Option PlansAt 31 December 2003, Rio Tinto plc and Rio Tinto Limited have a number of share based option plans, which are described below. The Company accounts for the fair value of its grants under those plans in accordance with FASB Statement 123. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for those plans was US$8 million, US$17 million and US$21 million for 2001, 2002 and 2003 respectively.
Fixed Share Option Plans Under these plans, the exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company's shares on the date of grant less a 20% discount and the maximum term of the option is between 2 and 5 years.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using an adjusted Black-Scholes option-pricing model prior to 2003 and an actuarial binomial option-pricing model for options granted during 2003, with the following weighted average assumptions for grants in 2001, 2002 and 2003:
A summary of the status of the Companies fixed share option plans as at 31 December 2001, 2002 and 2003, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:
A-70
At 31 December 2002 there were 3,554 (2001: nil) options exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of £7.44.
Performance Based Share Option Plan
Under its 1998 Executive Share Option Scheme and Share Option Plan, the Company grants selected executives and other key employees share option awards vesting of which is contingent upon increases in the Company's earnings per share above certain predetermined target levels. The exercise price of each option, which has a 10-year life, is equal to the market price of the Company's shares on the date of grant.
A summary of the status of the Company's performance-based share option plan as of 31 December 2001, 2002 and 2003, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:
A-71
At 31 December 2002 there were 1.9 million (2001: 1 million) options exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of £8.13 (2001: £8.20)
At 31 December 2002 there were 0.3 million (2001: 0.2 million) options exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of A$22.18 (2001: A$20.14)
A-72
As at 31 December 2003, Rio Tinto plc has 0.02 million performance options outstanding under the 1985 Executive Share Option Scheme with a exercise price of £8.61. These options have vested and have a weighted average remaining life of 0.3 years.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Rio Tinto Share Ownership Plan is a UK Inland Revenue approved share incentive plan which was approved by shareholders at the 2001 annual general meeting and introduced in 2002. Under this plan, eligible employees may save up to £125 per month, which the plan administrator invests in Rio Tinto plc shares ("Partnership" shares). Rio Tinto matches these purchases on a one for one basis ("Matching" shares). In addition, eligible employees can receive an annual award of Rio Tinto shares up to a maximum of five per cent of salary, subject to a cap of £3,000 ("Free" Shares).
The fair value of each award is taken to be the market value of the share on the date of purchase. The compensation costs for stocks granted during 2002 and 2003 were $0.3 million and $1.4 million respectively.
A summary of the shares awarded under the Company's employee stock purchase plan during the years 2002 and 2003 is presented below:
Performance Based Stock Plan
The Mining Companies Comparative Plan is a long-term performance share incentive plan which was approved by shareholders at the 1998 annual general meeting. Under this plan, eligible senior executives are annually awarded a conditional right to receive shares. These rights only vest if the performance conditions approved by the committee are satisfied. The current performance condition compares Rio Tinto's total shareholder return against a comparator group of 15 other international mining companies over a four year period.
The fair value of the awards is taken to be the market value of the shares at the date of award.
A summary of the status of the Company's performance-based stock plan as of 31 December 2001, 2002 and 2003, and changes during the years ending on those dates is presented below:
The compensation costs for stocks granted during 2001, 2002 and 2003 were £3.5 million, £4.7 million and £4.4 million respectively.
The compensation costs for stocks granted during 2001, 2002 and 2003 were A$5.5 million, A$6.1 million and A$6.4 million respectively.
A-73
The following supplements segmental information provided elsewhere in this report to provide additional information required under US GAAP.
Property, plant and equipment by location
Tax charge by product group
Covenants
Of the Rio Tinto Group's medium and long term borrowings of US$3.8 billion, some US$0.8 billion relates to the Group's share of non-recourse borrowings which are the subject of various financial and general covenants with which the respective borrowers are in compliance.
Accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities
During 2003, the following movements, before tax and minorities, took place in Other Comprehensive Income ('OCI') and earnings in relation to derivatives:
A-74
ALTERNATIVE ORE RESERVE ESTIMATES FOR US REPORTING
As a consequence of the US Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) requirement to use historical price data rather than assumptions of future commodity prices, which are the basis of the JORC Code reported numbers on pages 17 to 21 of the Annual Report, the reserves at certain operations have been amended for SEC reporting purposes only. Material changes are shown below.
The ore reserve figures in the following tables are as of 31 December 2003. Metric units are used throughout. The figures used to calculate Rio Tinto's share of reserves are often more precise than the rounded numbers shown in the tables, hence small differences might result if the calculations are repeated using the tabulated figures.
A - 75