Table of Contents
1 min
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒ Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2025
or
◻ Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number: 0-24649
REPUBLIC BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Kentucky
61-0862051
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
601 West Market Street, Louisville, Kentucky
40202
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (502) 584-3600
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol
Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A Common
RBCAA
The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ⌧ Yes ◻ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ⌧ Yes ◻ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ◻
Accelerated filer ⌧
Non-accelerated filer ◻
Smaller reporting company ◻
Emerging growth company ◻
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ◻ Yes ☒ No
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, as of October 31, 2025 was 17,388,491 and 2,148,876.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements.
4
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
61
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
113
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
114
Item 5.
Other Information.
Item 6.
Exhibits.
115
SIGNATURES
116
2
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
The terms identified in alphabetical order below are used throughout this Form 10-Q. You may find it helpful to refer to this page as you read this report.
Term
Definition
2024 Tax Season
December 2023 through February 2024
2025 Tax Season
December 2024 through February 2025
ACH
Automated Clearing House
ACL
Allowance for Credit Losses
ACLC
Allowance for Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures
ACLL
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans
AFS
Available for Sale
AOCI
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
ARM
Adjustable Rate Mortgage
ASC
Accounting Standards Codification
ASU
Accounting Standards Update
Basic EPS
Basic earnings per Class A Common Share
BOLI
Bank Owned Life Insurance
BPO
Brokered Price Opinion
C&LD
Construction and Land Development
C&I
Commercial and Industrial
CCAD
Commercial Credit Administration Department
CD
Certificate of Deposit
CDI
Core Deposit Intangible
CECL
Current Expected Credit Losses
CMO
Collateralized Mortgage Obligation
CODM
Chief Operating Decision Maker
Core Bank
The Traditional Banking and Warehouse Lending reportable segments of the Company
CRE
Commercial Real Estate
DDA
Demand Deposit Account
Diluted EPS
Diluted earnings per Class A Common Share
DTA
Deferred Tax Asset
EPS
Earnings Per Share
ERA
Early Season Refund Advance
ESPP
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
FDIC
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FFTR
Federal Funds Target Rate
FHLB
Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLMC
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
FNMA
Federal National Mortgage Association
FOMC
Federal Open Market Committee
FRB
Federal Reserve Bank
FTP
Funds Transfer Pricing
GAAP
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States
HEAL
Home Equity Amortizing Loan
HELOC
Home Equity Line of Credit
HFS
Held for Sale
HTM
Held to Maturity
LOC
Line of Credit
LOC I
RCS product introduced in 2014 for which the Bank participates out a 90% interest and holds a 10% interest
LOC II
RCS product introduced in 2021 for which the Bank participates out a 95% interest and holds a 5% interest
MBS
Mortgage Backed Security
MSR
Mortgage Servicing Right
NA
Not Applicable
NIM
Net Interest Margin
NM
Not Meaningful
OBS
Off-Balance Sheet
OCI
Other Comprehensive Income
OREO
Other Real Estate Owned
PCD
Purchased Credit Deteriorated
Prime
The Wall Street Journal Prime Interest Rate
Provision
Provision for Expected Credit Loss Expense
RA
Refund Advance
RB&T / the Bank
Republic Bank & Trust Company
RCS
Republic Credit Solutions segment
Republic / the Company
Republic Bancorp, Inc.
RPG
Republic Processing Group segment
RPS
Republic Payment Solutions segment
RT
Refund Transfer
SBA
U.S. Small Business Administration
SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission
SOFR
Secured Overnight Financing Right
SSUAR
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
Tax Provider
Third-party tax preparers located throughout the U.S., as well as tax-preparation software providers that offer Republic Bank ERAs, RAs, and RTs
TBA
To Be Announced
TRS
Tax Refund Solutions segment
TRUP
Trust Preferred Security Investment
Warehouse
Warehouse Lending segment
3
Item 1. Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) (in thousands, except share data)
September 30,
December 31,
2025
2024
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
$
484,238
432,151
Available-for-sale debt securities, at fair value (amortized cost of $849,734 in 2025 and $602,493 in 2024)
843,171
584,155
Held-to-maturity debt securities (fair value of $5,087 in 2025 and $10,735 in 2024)
5,110
10,778
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value
945
693
Mortgage loans held for sale, at fair value
15,338
8,312
Consumer loans held for sale, at fair value
8,444
5,443
Consumer loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or fair value
16,424
18,632
Loans
5,281,374
5,439,466
Allowance for credit losses
(79,865)
(91,978)
Loans, net
5,201,509
5,347,488
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
25,849
24,478
Premises and equipment, net
37,884
32,309
Right-of-use assets
32,804
36,182
Goodwill
40,516
Other real estate owned
1,246
1,160
Bank owned life insurance
109,773
107,125
Other assets and accrued interest receivable
191,668
197,245
TOTAL ASSETS
7,014,919
6,846,667
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing
1,239,023
1,207,764
Interest-bearing
4,099,322
4,002,782
Total deposits
5,338,345
5,210,546
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings
74,522
103,318
Operating lease liabilities
33,833
37,121
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
375,000
395,000
Other liabilities and accrued interest payable
108,699
108,653
Total liabilities
5,930,399
5,854,638
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Footnote 8)
—
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value
Class A Common Stock, no par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 17,387,179 shares (2025) and 17,297,878 shares (2024) issued and outstanding; Class B Common Stock, no par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, 2,148,876 shares (2025) and 2,150,090 shares (2024) issued and outstanding
4,600
4,587
Additional paid in capital
154,978
148,053
Retained earnings
932,042
853,627
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(7,100)
(14,238)
Total stockholders’ equity
1,084,520
992,029
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
See accompanying footnotes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans, including fees
89,675
90,594
297,472
296,723
Taxable investment securities
7,698
4,167
18,033
13,147
Federal Home Loan Bank stock and other
5,866
6,785
19,775
20,008
Total interest income
103,239
101,546
335,280
329,878
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits
22,094
25,802
65,322
78,571
141
393
403
4,059
4,298
13,705
14,144
Total interest expense
26,269
30,241
79,420
93,118
NET INTEREST INCOME
76,970
71,305
255,860
236,760
Provision for expected credit loss expense on loans
2,023
5,660
21,518
41,425
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION
74,947
65,645
234,342
195,335
NONINTEREST INCOME:
Service charges on deposit accounts
3,646
3,693
10,611
10,532
Net refund transfer fees
1,117
582
17,577
15,213
Mortgage banking income
2,064
2,062
5,781
3,984
Interchange fee income
3,030
3,286
9,307
9,794
Program fees
4,888
4,962
13,161
13,539
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
1,035
826
2,649
2,372
Net losses on other real estate owned
(52)
(53)
(158)
(154)
Gain on sale of Visa Class B-1 shares
4,090
Other
840
1,455
4,348
3,252
Total noninterest income
16,568
16,813
67,366
58,532
NONINTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits
31,027
28,792
92,897
87,651
Technology, equipment, and communication
8,710
7,544
26,037
22,374
Occupancy
3,547
3,224
10,502
10,455
Marketing and development
2,668
1,983
5,298
6,612
FDIC insurance expense
763
764
2,313
2,284
Interchange related expense
1,640
1,540
4,764
4,250
Legal and professional fees
1,100
870
2,884
2,695
Core conversion and contract consulting fees
97
5,993
Merger expense
41
4,201
3,892
12,906
12,852
Total noninterest expense
53,753
48,609
163,594
149,214
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE
37,762
33,849
138,114
104,653
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
8,018
7,306
29,618
22,298
NET INCOME
29,744
26,543
108,496
82,355
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Class A Common Stock
1.53
1.37
5.57
4.25
Class B Common Stock
1.39
1.25
5.07
3.87
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
1.52
5.55
4.24
1.24
5.05
3.85
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
Net income
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Change in fair value of derivatives
51
(3,134)
(2,122)
(3,580)
Reclassification amount for net derivative losses realized in income
(47)
(289)
(138)
(380)
Unrealized gain on AFS debt securities
3,275
9,503
11,775
12,195
Total other comprehensive income before income tax
3,279
6,080
9,515
8,235
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income
(818)
(1,520)
(2,377)
(2,060)
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax
2,461
4,560
7,138
6,175
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
32,205
31,103
115,634
88,530
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2025
Common Stock
Accumulated
Class A
Class B
Additional
Total
Shares
Paid In
Retained
Comprehensive
Stockholders’
Outstanding
Amount
Capital
Earnings
Income (Loss)
Equity
Balance, July 1, 2025
17,378
2,149
4,597
153,733
911,337
(9,561)
1,060,106
Net change in AOCI
Dividends declared on Common Stock:
Class A Shares ($0.451 per share)
(7,802)
Class B Shares ($0.410 per share)
(881)
Stock options exercised, net of shares withheld
7
366
(325)
43
Conversion of Class B to Class A Common Shares
Repurchase of Class A Common Stock
Net change in notes receivable on Class A Common Stock
(17)
Deferred compensation - Class A Common Stock:
Directors
135
Designated key employees
147
Employee stock purchase plan - Class A Common Stock
1
162
163
Stock-based awards - Class A Common Stock:
Performance stock units
36
Restricted stock, net of shares withheld
264
(31)
233
Stock options
152
Balance, September 30, 2025
17,387
Three Months Ended September 30, 2024
Balance, July 1, 2024
17,275
2,150
4,581
144,139
825,496
(18,793)
955,423
Class A Shares ($0.407 per share)
(7,007)
Class B Shares ($0.370 per share)
(796)
17
1,767
(1,601)
170
60
109
164
177
178
(2)
(1)
262
(120)
124
Balance, September 30, 2024
17,293
4,585
146,838
842,515
(14,233)
979,705
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025
Balance, January 1, 2025
17,298
Class A Shares ($1.353 per share)
(23,404)
Class B Shares ($1.230 per share)
(2,644)
53
12
3,974
(3,578)
408
(8)
(64)
(72)
(65)
437
18
405
(179)
225
8
529
531
108
10
1,078
(212)
866
467
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024
Balance, January 1, 2024
17,203
2,155
4,553
142,124
786,487
(20,408)
912,756
Class A Shares ($1.221 per share)
(20,989)
Class B Shares ($1.110 per share)
(2,388)
65
32
1,784
(2,510)
(694)
(5)
106
620
11
560
573
576
(3)
507
(440)
64
456
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net amortization on investment securities and low-income housing investments
6,379
4,617
Net accretion and amortization on loans and deposits
(2,999)
(2,266)
Unrealized and realized gains on equity securities with readily determinable fair value
(252)
Depreciation of premises and equipment
5,069
5,278
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights
1,306
1,271
Provision for on-balance sheet exposures
Provision for off-balance sheet exposures
(10)
(340)
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale
(4,604)
(2,430)
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale
(152,515)
(136,894)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale
150,093
135,022
Net gain on sale of consumer loans held for sale
(11,206)
(11,221)
Origination of consumer loans held for sale
(859,496)
(940,901)
Proceeds from sale of consumer loans held for sale
869,581
950,249
Net gain realized on sale of other real estate owned
(4)
Writedowns of other real estate owned
158
Deferred compensation expense - Class A Common Stock
662
1,180
Stock-based awards and ESPP expense - Class A Common Stock
1,521
714
Amortization of right-of-use assets
4,590
4,076
Repayment of operating lease liabilities
(4,505)
(4,024)
(2,649)
(2,372)
(4,090)
Net change in other assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable
(669)
557
Accrued interest payable
(670)
1,106
Other assets
(9,071)
(7,687)
Other liabilities
18,281
6,666
Net cash provided by operating activities
134,918
126,470
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of available-for-sale debt securities
(636,155)
(110,000)
Proceeds from calls, maturities and paydowns of equity and available-for-sale debt securities
388,947
246,769
Proceeds from calls, maturities and paydowns of held-to-maturity debt securities
5,668
65,483
Net change in outstanding warehouse lines of credit
(59,066)
(255,440)
Net change in other loans, net of allowance
181,560
91,380
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans transferred to held for sale
67,176
Net proceeds from sale of consumer loans transferred to held for sale
5,305
Purchases of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
(1,371)
(211)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned
172
Proceeds from sale of Visa Class B-1 shares
Investments in low-income housing tax partnerships
(19,054)
(10,018)
Net purchases of premises and equipment
(7,380)
(4,874)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
(137,456)
90,437
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net change in deposits
127,799
48,533
Net change in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings
(28,796)
(18,235)
Payments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
(503,000)
(815,000)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
483,000
805,000
Net proceeds from Class A Common Stock purchased through employee stock purchase plan
451
490
Net proceeds from option exercises and equity awards vested - Class A Common Stock
Cash dividends paid
(25,165)
(22,703)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
54,625
(2,609)
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
52,087
214,298
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
316,567
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
530,865
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASHFLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest
80,089
92,013
Income taxes
19,953
20,955
SUPPLEMENTAL NONCASH DISCLOSURES:
Mortgage servicing rights capitalized
1,129
913
Transfers from loans to real estate acquired in settlement of loans
212
169
Loans provided for sale of other real estate owned
244
Net transfers from loans held for investment to loans held for sale
4,977
68,173
New unfunded obligations in low-income-housing investments
7,000
11,000
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities
1,212
5,282
Premises and equipment obtained through the use of vendor credits
3,264
9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS –SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 and 2024 AND DECEMBER 31, 2024 (UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Republic Bancorp, Inc. (the “Parent Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Republic Bank & Trust Company. As used in this filing, the terms “Republic,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Republic Bancorp, Inc., and, where the context requires, Republic Bancorp, Inc., and its subsidiary. The term the “Bank” refers to the Company’s subsidiary bank, Republic Bank & Trust Company, as well as, its wholly owned subsidiary, RBT Insurance Agency LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Republic is a financial holding company headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky. The Bank is a Kentucky-based, state-chartered non-member financial institution that provides both traditional and non-traditional banking products through five reportable segments using a multitude of delivery channels. While the Bank operates primarily in its geographical market footprint where it has physical locations, its non-brick-and-mortar delivery channels allow it to reach clients across the U.S.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2025. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Republic’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. Certain amounts presented in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on previously reported prior periods’ net income or shareholders’ equity.
BUSINESS SEGMENT COMPOSITION
As of September 30, 2025, the Company was divided into five reportable segments: (I) Traditional Banking, (II) Warehouse Lending, (III) TRS, (IV) RPS, and (V) RCS. Management considers the first two segments to collectively constitute “Core Bank” or “Core Banking” operations, while the last three segments collectively constitute RPG operations.
The Company’s Executive Chair and Chief Executive Officer serve as the Company’s CODM’s. Income (loss) before income tax expense is the reportable measure of segment profit or loss that the CODM’s regularly review and utilize to allocate resources and assess performance.
The Core Bank consists of the Traditional Banking and Warehouse Lending segments.
The Traditional Banking segment, which also includes the results of the former mortgage banking segment, provides traditional banking products primarily to customers in the Company’s market footprint ,with all products and services generally offered under the Company’s traditional RB&T brand. As of September 30, 2025, Republic had 47 full-service banking centers with locations as follows:
●
Kentucky — 29
Metropolitan Louisville — 19
Central Kentucky — 6
Georgetown — 1
Lexington — 5
Northern Kentucky (Metropolitan Cincinnati) — 4
●Bellevue— 1
Crestview Hills — 1
Florence — 1
Indiana — 3
Southern Indiana (Metropolitan Louisville) — 3
Floyds Knobs — 1
Jeffersonville — 1
New Albany — 1
Florida — 7
Metropolitan Tampa — 7
Ohio — 4
Metropolitan Cincinnati — 4
Tennessee — 4
Metropolitan Nashville — 4
Republic’s headquarters are in Louisville, which is the largest city in Kentucky based on population.
Traditional Banking results of operations are primarily dependent upon net interest income, which represents the difference between the interest income and fees on interest-earning assets and the interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Principal interest-earning Traditional Banking assets represent investment securities and commercial and consumer loans primarily secured by real estate and/or personal property. Interest-bearing liabilities primarily consist of interest-bearing deposit accounts, SSUAR, as well as short-term and long-term borrowing sources. FHLB advances have traditionally served as a significant borrowing and liquidity source for the Bank.
Other sources of Traditional Banking income include service charges on deposit accounts, mortgage banking income, debit and credit card interchange fee income, title insurance commissions, swap fee income and increases in the cash surrender value of BOLI.
Traditional Banking operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and employee benefits; technology, equipment, and communication; occupancy; interchange related expense; marketing and development; FDIC insurance expense, and various other general and administrative costs. Traditional Banking results of operations are significantly impacted by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, government laws and policies, and actions of regulatory agencies.
The Core Bank provides short-term, revolving credit facilities to mortgage bankers across the U.S. through mortgage warehouse lines of credit. These credit facilities are primarily secured by single-family, first-lien residential real estate loans. The credit facility enables the mortgage banking clients to close single-family, first-lien residential real estate loans in their own name and temporarily fund their inventory of these closed loans until the loans are sold to investors approved by the Bank. Individual loans are expected to remain on the warehouse LOC for an average of 15 to 30 days. Advances for reverse mortgage loans and construction loans typically remain on the LOC longer than conventional mortgage loans. Interest income and loan fees are accrued for each individual advance during the time the advance remains on the warehouse LOC and collected when the loan is sold. The Core Bank receives the sale proceeds of each loan directly from the investor and applies the funds to pay off the warehouse advance and related accrued interest and fees. The remaining proceeds are credited to the mortgage banking client.
Republic Processing Group
Through the TRS segment, the Bank facilitates the receipt and payment of federal and state tax refund products and offers a credit product through third-party tax preparers located throughout the U.S., as well as tax-preparation software providers that offer Republic Bank RTs, RAs, and ERAs (collectively, the “Tax Providers”). The majority of the business generated by the TRS business occurs during the first half of each year. During the second half of each year, TRS generates limited revenue and incurs costs preparing for the next year’s tax season. During December 2024 and 2003, TRS originated ERAs related to tax returns that were anticipated to be filed during the first quarter of the following tax filing season.
RTs are fee-based products whereby a tax refund is issued to the taxpayer after the Bank has received the refund from the federal or state government. There is no credit risk or borrowing cost associated with these products, as they are only delivered to the taxpayer upon receipt of the tax refund directly from the governmental paying authority. An RT allows a taxpayer to pay any applicable tax preparation and filing related fees directly from their federal or state government tax refund, with the remainder of the tax refund disbursed directly to the taxpayer. RT fees and all applicable tax preparation, transmitter, audit, and any other taxpayer authorized amounts are deducted from the tax refund by either the Bank or the Bank’s service provider and automatically forwarded to the appropriate party as authorized by the taxpayer. RT fees generally receive first priority when applying fees against the taxpayer’s refund,
with the Bank’s share of RT fees generally superior to the claims of other third-party service providers, including the Tax Providers. The remainder of the refund is disbursed to the taxpayer by a Bank check, direct deposit to the taxpayer’s personal bank account, or loaded to a prepaid card.
The Company executes contracts with individual Tax Providers to offer RTs to their taxpayer customers. RT revenue is recognized by the Bank immediately after the taxpayer’s refund is disbursed in accordance with the RT contract with the taxpayer customer. The fee paid by the taxpayer for the RT is shared between the Bank and the Tax Providers based on contracts executed between the parties.
The Company presents RT revenue net of any amounts shared with the Tax Providers. The Bank’s share of RT revenue is generally based on the obligations undertaken by the Tax Provider for each individual RT program, with more obligations generally corresponding to higher RT revenue share. The significant majority of net RT revenue is recognized and obligations under RT contracts fulfilled by the Bank during the first half of each year. Incremental expenses associated with the fulfilment of RT contracts are generally expensed during the first half of the year. Fees earned by the Company on RTs, net of revenue share, are reported as noninterest income under the line item “Net refund transfer fees.”
The RA product is a loan made in conjunction with the filing of a taxpayer’s federal tax return, which allows the taxpayer to borrow funds as an advance of a portion of their tax refund. The RA product had the following features during the 2024 and 2025 Tax Seasons:
Since its introduction in December of 2022, the ERA product has been structured similarly to the RA, with the primary differences being the timing of when the ERAs are originated and the documentation available to underwrite the ERAs. The ERA is originated prior to the taxpayer receiving their fiscal year taxable income documentation, e.g., W-2, and the filing of the taxpayer’s final federal tax return. As such, the Company generally uses paystub information to underwrite the ERA. The repayment of the ERA is incumbent upon the taxpayer client returning to the Bank’s Tax Provider for the filing of their final federal tax return in order for the tax refund to potentially be received by the Bank from the federal government to pay off the advance. The ERA product had the following features during the 2024 and 2025 Tax Seasons:
The Company reports fees paid ERAs/RAs, as “Interest income on loans.” The number of days for delinquency eligibility is based on management’s annual analysis of tax return processing times. RAs, including ERAs that were originated related to the first quarter 2024 tax filing season were repaid, on average, within 32 days after the taxpayer’s tax return was submitted to the applicable taxing authority.
Since ERAs/RAs do not have a contractual due date, the Company considered the advance delinquent during 2025 if it remained unpaid 35 days after the taxpayer’s tax return was submitted to the applicable taxing authority.
Provisions on ERAs/RAs are estimated when advances are made. Unpaid ERAs/RAs related to the first quarter tax filing season of a given year are considered delinquent at June 30th of that year and charged-off. In addition, as of June 30, 2025, RAs that were subject to Tax Provider loan loss guarantees were charged-off and immediately recorded as recoveries of previously charged-off loans with corresponding receivables recorded in other assets for the Tax Provider guarantees. Corresponding receivables are settled during the third quarter of each year. RAs collected during the second half of each year, not subject to loan loss guarantee arrangements, are recorded as recoveries of previously charged-off loans.
Related to the overall credit losses on ERAs/RAs, the Bank’s ability to control losses is highly dependent upon its ability to predict the taxpayer’s likelihood to receive the tax refund as claimed on the taxpayer’s tax return. In addition, the Bank’s ability to control losses for the ERA product is highly dependent upon the taxpayer returning to a Tax Provider for the filing of their final tax return. Each year, the Bank’s RA approval model is based primarily on the prior-year’s tax refund payment patterns. Because the substantial majority of the RA volume occurs each year before that year’s tax refund payment patterns can be analyzed and subsequent underwriting changes made, credit losses during a current year could be higher than management’s predictions if tax refund payment patterns change materially between years.
In response to changes in the legal, regulatory, and competitive environment, management annually reviews and revises ERA/RA product parameters. Changes in product parameters do not ensure positive results and could have an overall material negative impact on the performance of all ERA/RA product offerings and therefore on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
The RPS segment offers a range of payment-related products and services to consumers through third-party service providers. Through the Bank, the RPS segment offers both (1) issuing solutions and (2) money movement capabilities.
Issuing Solutions:
The RPS segment offers prepaid and debit solutions primarily marketed to the consumer industry. Prepaid solutions include the issuing of payroll and general purpose reloadable cards. Characteristics of these cards include the following:
Debit solutions include the issuing of DDAs, savings accounts and/or debit cards. In addition to offering traditional point of sale purchasing, automated teller machine withdrawals, and direct deposit options, these accounts may include overdraft protection.
Money Movement Capabilities:
Through the Bank, the RPS segment participates in traditional money movement solutions including ACH transactions, wire transfer, check processing, and the Mastercard Remote Payment and Presentment Service. These capabilities are also complementary products facilitating the movement of money for other RPG divisions.
The Company reports its share of client-related charges and fees for RPS programs as noninterest income under “Program fees.” Additionally, the Company’s portion of interchange revenue generated by prepaid card transactions is reported as noninterest income under “Interchange fee income.” The Company began sharing interest income revenue with its largest prepaid marketer-servicer during 2024, with the interest shared reported as “Interest expense on deposits.” The Company has not shared interest income revenue with its largest prepaid marketer-servicer for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, as minimum deposit balance thresholds were not met.
13
Through the Bank, the RCS segment offers consumer credit products. In general, the credit products are unsecured, small dollar consumer loans that are dependent on various factors. RCS loans typically earn a higher yield but also have higher credit risk compared to loans originated through the Traditional Banking segment, with a significant portion of RCS clients considered subprime or near-prime borrowers. Ordinary gains or losses on the sale of RCS products are reported as a component of “Program fees.” Through the Bank, RCS uses third-party service providers for certain services such as marketing and loan servicing for RCS’ (1) LOC products, (2) Installment loan product and (3) Healthcare receivables products.
LOC Products:
Through the Bank, RCS uses third-party service providers to originate two LOC products to generally subprime or near-prime borrowers. in multiple states. Elastic Marketing, LLC and Elevate Decision Sciences, LLC are third-party service providers for the LOC I product and are subject to the Bank’s oversight and supervision. Together, these companies provide certain marketing, servicing, technology, and support services, while a separate third-party provides customer support, servicing, and other services on the Bank’s behalf. The Bank is the lender for this product and is marketed as such. Furthermore, the Bank controls the loan terms and underwriting guidelines, and the Bank exercises consumer compliance oversight of the product.
The Bank sells participation interests in this product. These participation interests are a 90% interest in advances made to borrowers under the borrower’s LOC account, and the participation interests are generally sold three business days following the Bank’s funding of the associated advances. Although the Bank retains a 10% participation interest in each advance, it maintains 100% ownership of the underlying LOC I account with each borrower. Loan balances HFS through this program are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.
Similar to its LOC I product, the Bank provides oversight and supervision to a third-party for its LOC II product. In return, this third-party provides the Bank with marketing services and loan servicing for the LOC II product. The Bank is the lender for this product and is marketed as such. Furthermore, the Bank controls the loan terms and underwriting guidelines, and the Bank exercises consumer compliance oversight of this product.
The Bank sells 95% participation interests in the LOC II product. These participation interests are generally sold three business days following the Bank’s funding of the associated advances. Although the Bank retains a 5% participation interest in each advance, it maintains 100% ownership of the underlying LOC II account with each borrower. Loan balances HFS through this program are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.
Installment Loan Product:
Through RCS, the Bank offers installment loans with terms ranging from 12 to 60 months to borrowers in multiple states. The same third-party service provider for RCS’s LOC II is the third-party provider for the installment loan product. This third-party provider is subject to the Bank’s oversight and supervision and provides the Bank with marketing services and loan servicing for these RCS installment loans. The Bank is the lender for these loans and is marketed as such. Furthermore, the Bank controls the loan terms and underwriting guidelines, and the Bank exercises consumer compliance oversight of this RCS installment loan product. Currently, all loan balances originated under this RCS installment loan program are carried as HFS on the Bank’s balance sheet, with the intent to sell loans to a third-party, who is an affiliate of the Bank’s third-party service provider, generally within 16 days following the Bank’s origination of the loans. Loans originated under this RCS installment loan program are carried at fair value under a fair-value option, with the portfolio marked to market monthly.
14
Healthcare Receivables Products:
Through RCS, Bank originates healthcare receivables products across the U.S. through three different third-party service providers. For two of the programs, the Bank retains 100% of the receivables, with recourse in the event of default. For the remaining program, in some instances the Bank retains 100% of the receivables originated, with recourse in the event of default, and in other instances, the Bank sells 100% of the receivables generally within one month of origination. Loan balances HFS through this program are carried at the lower of cost or fair value.
For the RCS LOC and healthcare receivable products, the Company reports interest income and loan origination fees under “Loans, including fees,” while any net gains or losses on sale and mark-to-market adjustments of RCS loans are reported as noninterest income under “Program fees.” The Company has elected fair value accounting for its RCS installment loan product that it sells after an initial holding period. As a result, interest income on loans, loan origination fees, net gains or losses on sale, and mark-to-market adjustments for the RCS installment product are reported as noninterest income under “Program fees.”
15
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
The following ASUs were adopted by the Company during the nine months ended September 30, 2025:
Method of
Financial
ASU. No.
Topic
Nature of Update
Date Adopted
Adoption
Statement Impact
2024-02
Codification Improvements—Amendments to Remove References to the Concepts Statements
This ASU contains amendments to the Codification that remove references to various Concepts Statements. In most instances the references are extraneous and not required to understand or apply the guidance. In other instances the references were used in prior Statements to provide guidance in certain topical areas.
January 1, 2025
Prospectively
Immaterial
The following not-yet-effective ASUs are considered relevant to the Company’s financial statements.
Date Adoption
Expected
Required
Method
Financial Impact
2023-09
Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures
Among other things, these amendments require that public business entities on an annual basis (1) disclose specific categories in the rate reconciliation and income tax paid information and (2) provide additional information for reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold (if the effect of those reconciling items is equal to or greater than 5 percent of the amount computed by multiplying pretax income [or loss] by the applicable statutory income tax rate).
Annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2024.
The Company will update its income tax disclosures upon adoption within its 2025 Form 10-K.
2024-03
Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses
This ASU requires public companies to disclose, in the notes to financial statements, specified information about certain costs and expenses at each interim and annual reporting period.
Annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2026, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2027.
Retrospectively
The Company is currently analyzing the impact of this ASU on its financial statements.
2025-01
Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Clarifying the Effective Date
This ASU amends the effective date of ASU No. 2024-03 to clarify that all public business entities are required to adopt the guidance in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027.
2025-05
Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets
This ASU provides a practical expedient to assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date will persist through the reasonable and supportable forecast period for eligible assets.
Annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2025, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods.
2025-06
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other— Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software.
This ASU modernizes and clarifies the threshold for when an entity is required to start capitalizing software costs and is based on when (i) management has authorized and committed to funding the software project and (ii) it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended.
Annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2027, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods.
2025-07
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Derivatives Scope Refinements and Scope Clarification for Share-Based Noncash Consideration from a Customer in a Revenue Contract
This ASU refines the scope of Topic 815 to clarify which contracts are subject to derivative accounting. The guidance also provides clarification under Topic 606 for share-based payments from a customer in a revenue contract.
Annual reporting periods beginning after Dec. 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods.
16
2. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Available-for-Sale Debt Securities
The following tables summarize the amortized cost and fair value of AFS debt securities along with the corresponding amounts of related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in AOCI:
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Fair
September 30, 2025 (in thousands)
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. Government agencies
265,913
(2,296)
263,726
Private label mortgage-backed security
1,452
Mortgage-backed securities - residential
560,809
2,655
(8,011)
555,453
Collateralized mortgage obligations
18,100
24
(656)
17,468
Corporate bonds
1,002
Trust preferred security
3,910
160
4,070
Total available-for-sale debt securities
849,734
4,400
(10,963)
December 31, 2024 (in thousands)
395,609
(6,527)
389,086
121
1,429
1,550
180,765
193
(12,725)
168,233
20,127
27
(911)
19,243
2,008
2,009
3,863
171
4,034
602,493
1,825
(20,163)
Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities
The following tables summarize the amortized cost and fair value of HTM debt securities along with the corresponding amounts of related gross unrecognized gains and losses:
Unrecognized
5,096
31
(54)
5,073
Total held-to-maturity debt securities
5,087
23
5,756
(86)
5,706
4,999
5,005
10,735
Sales and Calls of Available-for-Sale Debt Securities
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, there were no material gains or losses on sales or calls of AFS debt securities.
Debt Securities by Contractual Maturity
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity as of September 30, 2025, follows. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date are detailed separately.
Available-for-Sale
Held-to-Maturity
Debt Securities
Due in one year or less
11,002
10,780
Due from one year to five years
255,913
253,948
Due from five years to ten years
Due beyond ten years
Total debt securities
Unrealized Loss Analysis on Debt Securities
The following tables summarize AFS debt securities in an unrealized loss position for which an ACLS had not been recorded, aggregated by investment category and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position:
Less than 12 months
12 months or more
Fair Value
Available-for-sale debt securities:
50,939
(30)
77,717
128,656
87,466
(362)
89,791
(7,649)
177,257
664
14,647
(655)
15,311
139,069
(393)
182,155
(10,570)
321,224
145,048
209,033
(6,315)
354,081
52,347
(874)
104,453
(11,851)
156,800
700
15,951
(903)
16,651
198,095
(1,094)
329,437
(19,069)
527,532
As of September 30, 2025, the Bank’s security portfolio consisted of 198 securities, 93 of which were in an unrealized loss position.
As of December 31, 2024, the Bank’s security portfolio consisted of 182 securities, 114 of which were in an unrealized loss position.
As of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, there were no holdings of debt securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity.
Mortgage-Backed Securities and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
As of September 30, 2025, with the exception of the $1.5 million private label MBS, all other MBS’s and CMO’s held by the Bank were issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily the FHLMC and FNMA. As of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, there were gross unrealized losses of approximately $9 million and $14 million related to AFS MBS’s and CMO’s. Because these unrealized losses are attributable to changes in interest rates and illiquidity, and not credit quality, and because the Bank does not have the intent to sell these securities, and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, management does not consider these securities to have credit-related impairment that would require a provision adjustment to the ACLS.
There were no HTM debt securities on nonaccrual or past due 90 days or more as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024. All of the Company’s HTM corporate bonds were rated investment grade as of December 31, 2024. There were no HTM debt securities considered collateral dependent as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024.
Accrued interest receivable on AFS debt securities is presented as a component of other assets on the Company’s balance sheet and is excluded from the ACLS, if applicable. Accrued interest on AFS debt securities totaled $4 million and $3 million as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024. Accrued interest receivable on HTM debt securities totaled $13,000 as of September 30, 2025, and $60,000 as of December 31, 2024.
Pledged Debt Securities
Debt securities pledged to secure public deposits, SSUAR, and debt securities held for other purposes, as required or permitted by law, were as follows:
As of
September 30, 2025
December 31, 2024
Amortized cost
137,382
205,160
Fair value
135,151
199,607
Carrying amount
Equity Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of equity securities with readily determinable fair values were as follows:
Freddie Mac preferred stock
Total equity securities
For equity securities with readily determinable fair values, the gross realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of income were as follows:
Gains (Losses) Recognized on Equity Securities
Realized
189
42
252
19
3. LOANS HELD FOR SALE
In the ordinary course of business, the Bank originates for sale mortgage loans and consumer loans. Mortgage loans originated for sale are primarily originated and sold into the secondary market through the Bank’s Traditional Banking segment, while consumer loans originated for sale are originated and sold through the RCS segment.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value
See additional detail regarding mortgage loans HFS under the Footnote titled “Mortgage Banking Activities.”
Consumer Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value
Through RCS, the Bank offers RCS installment loans with terms ranging from 12 to 60 months to borrowers in multiple states. Balances originated under this RCS installment loan program are carried as HFS on the Bank’s balance sheet, with the intent to sell to a third-party, who is an affiliate of the Bank’s third-party service provider, generally within 16 days following origination. Loans originated under the RCS installment loan program are carried at fair value under a fair-value option, with the portfolio marked to market monthly.
Activity for consumer loans HFS and carried at fair value follows:
Balance, beginning of period
8,341
7,914
40,388
43,268
123,200
120,668
Proceeds from the sale of consumer loans held for sale
(42,095)
(46,704)
(123,995)
(125,795)
1,839
1,175
3,796
3,293
Balance, end of period
Consumer Loans Held for Sale, at the Lower of Cost or Fair Value
RCS originates for sale 90% or 95% of the balances from its LOC products and 100% for some of its healthcare receivables products. Ordinary gains or losses on the sale of these RCS products are reported as a component of “Program fees.”
During the first quarter of 2025, Management reached an agreement to sell $5 million of consumer credit cards, and as a result, these balances were re-designated from held for investment to HFS as of March 31, 2025 with the sale finalized during the second quarter of 2025.
Activity for consumer loans HFS and carried at the lower of cost or market value was as follows:
19,640
23,860
16,094
231,330
307,145
736,296
820,233
Transferred from held for investment to held for sale
(236,813)
(314,206)
(750,891)
(824,454)
2,267
3,002
7,410
7,928
19,801
20
4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES ON LOANS
The composition of the loan portfolio follows:
Traditional Banking:
Residential real estate:
Owner-occupied
1,044,737
1,032,459
Nonowner-occupied
291,373
318,096
Commercial real estate:
643,519
659,216
801,644
840,517
Multi-family
321,453
313,444
Construction & land development
246,065
244,121
Commercial & industrial
488,786
460,245
Lease financing receivables
96,605
93,304
Aircraft*
202,742
226,179
Home equity
399,691
353,441
Consumer:
Credit cards
10,787
16,464
Overdrafts
881
982
Automobile loans
813
1,156
Other consumer
9,210
9,555
Total Traditional Banking
4,558,306
4,569,179
Warehouse lines of credit*
609,826
550,760
Total Core Banking
5,168,132
5,119,939
Republic Processing Group*:
Tax Refund Solutions:
Refund Advances
138,614
Other TRS commercial & industrial loans
292
52,180
Republic Credit Solutions
112,950
128,733
Total Republic Processing Group
113,242
319,527
Total loans**
Total loans, net
*Identifies loans to borrowers located primarily outside of the Bank’s market footprint.
**Total loans are presented inclusive of premiums, discounts, and net loan origination fees and costs. See the following table for expanded detail.
The following table reconciles the contractually receivable and carrying amounts of loans:
Contractually receivable
5,289,347
5,445,531
Unearned income
(3,126)
(2,932)
Unamortized premiums
144
184
Unaccreted discounts
(1,238)
(1,619)
Other net unamortized deferred origination (fees) and costs
(3,753)
(1,698)
Carrying value of loans
21
Credit Quality Indicators
The following tables include loans by segment, risk category, and, for non-revolving loans, based upon year of origination. Loan segments and risk categories as of September 30, 2025 changed from those defined in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, as the CRE loan pool was further segmented into Owner-occupied CRE, Nonowner-occupied CRE, and Multi-family beginning in 2025. Regarding origination year, loan extensions and renewals are generally considered originated in the year extended or renewed unless the loan is classified as a loan modification. Loan extensions and renewals classified as loan modifications generally receive no change in origination date upon extension or renewal.
Revolving Loans
Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
Converted
As of September 30, 2025
2023
2022
2021
Prior
Cost Basis
to Term
Residential real estate owner-occupied:
Risk Rating
Pass or not rated
116,527
60,041
214,910
167,712
139,824
312,329
9,051
1,020,394
Special Mention
1,657
3,719
5,376
Substandard
182
556
2,082
2,693
2,513
10,941
18,967
Doubtful
116,709
60,597
216,992
172,062
142,337
326,989
YTD Gross Charge-offs
45
80
Residential real estate nonowner-occupied:
10,335
13,252
50,310
51,121
64,798
98,277
2,740
290,833
540
98,817
Commercial real estate owner-occupied:
57,325
40,557
65,885
104,309
94,985
186,287
14,572
66,051
629,971
759
1,118
949
5,165
597
2,225
429
11,242
339
1,967
2,306
58,423
41,675
66,834
109,474
95,582
190,479
66,480
Commercial real estate nonowner-occupied:
31,536
49,047
104,084
134,881
103,403
247,295
19,283
90,543
780,072
712
4,000
16,860
20,860
107,403
264,867
Commercial real estate multi-family:
8,973
12,905
47,926
68,386
46,894
61,209
4,491
70,669
Construction & land development:
57,705
59,654
85,876
23,898
13,257
4,349
1,326
Commercial & industrial:
72,259
72,934
65,005
49,067
39,663
42,313
129,508
11,178
481,927
926
78
1,964
1,626
4,886
250
92
1,287
344
1,973
73,860
65,333
51,123
41,289
43,600
129,800
11,522
Lease financing receivables:
28,234
26,356
27,068
10,362
2,723
1,208
95,951
37
68
249
227
120
26,398
27,332
10,550
2,875
1,216
107
138
22
Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year (Continued)
Aircraft:
13,752
28,804
58,116
35,708
30,917
35,144
202,441
301
31,218
Home equity:
394,928
1,742
3,021
1,860
5,068
1,896
71
651
12,024
21,607
83
84
652
12,107
21,691
798
834
Warehouse:
TRS:
15,501
9,557
25,058
RCS:
1,007
4,235
5,456
791
57
196
101,208
14,142
Grand Total:
399,805
372,853
726,532
646,306
536,558
989,258
1,287,166
250,232
5,208,710
2,044
1,064
8,854
2,367
6,656
2,034
24,207
521
598
2,559
2,905
6,822
31,604
3,104
48,457
Grand Total
401,085
375,495
730,155
658,065
545,747
1,027,518
1,292,304
251,005
15,528
9,558
67
50
14,943
40,273
As of December 31, 2024
2020
79,874
236,681
181,703
157,834
150,449
191,013
8,840
1,006,394
4,343
4,426
875
1,052
2,566
2,806
4,099
10,241
21,639
80,749
237,733
184,269
160,640
154,631
205,597
39
62
15,147
53,718
58,776
69,355
57,310
59,130
2,431
315,867
1,795
1,815
414
60,571
59,564
44,982
68,442
113,338
101,216
114,208
120,576
16,503
64,832
644,097
1,177
5,324
832
545
5,897
317
14,092
785
242
1,027
46,159
118,662
102,048
115,538
126,715
16,820
50,179
106,785
139,026
112,082
144,363
148,481
16,337
97,321
814,574
4,171
17,592
25,763
180
116,082
148,534
166,253
13,766
41,171
79,181
56,993
38,908
41,422
5,054
36,949
52,732
105,616
63,117
15,741
1,689
3,740
1,161
243,796
325
105,941
82,096
77,333
63,187
48,621
25,608
25,286
125,002
4,722
451,855
1,225
34
359
2,126
922
2,022
843
7,531
81
73
333
26
859
83,321
77,448
63,619
50,749
26,530
27,641
125,871
5,066
34,335
34,370
15,427
5,759
2,226
92,568
46
48
231
360
30
505
34,508
15,833
5,830
2,299
499
205
36,972
71,706
40,778
35,652
23,933
16,380
225,421
312
446
758
35,964
16,826
350,828
100
5,156
2,403
240
94
1,256
18,426
27,594
563
5,712
1,263
28,157
828
1,170
1,103
3,105
190,794
23,534
9,158
32,692
8,625
9,954
3,000
295
247
47,383
58,959
128,463
270
59,229
19,239
614,658
808,179
757,773
603,642
558,960
655,118
1,143,030
215,095
5,356,455
2,402
382
7,524
6,999
5,794
29,922
1,260
54,283
1,431
1,248
2,999
3,150
4,884
11,863
2,809
28,728
618,491
809,809
768,296
613,791
569,638
696,903
1,147,099
215,439
24,362
10,383
192
33
20,406
55,394
25
The following tables present the activity in the ACLL by portfolio class:
ACLL Roll-forward
Three Months Ended September 30,
Beginning
Charge-
Ending
Balance
offs
Recoveries
10,626
274
(51)
10,854
9,544
(141)
9,417
3,883
(177)
3,706
2,957
2,906
Commercial real estate*:
Owner-occupied*
7,143
(32)
7,111
Nonowner-occupied*
11,952
(330)
11,622
Multi-Family*
2,751
2,765
Total commercial real estate*
21,846
(348)
21,498
26,161
(135)
313
26,339
8,725
(475)
8,250
6,922
(261)
6,661
2,455
2,485
4,133
(122)
4,012
983
47
1,030
1,116
Aircraft
530
(23)
601
(13)
588
8,106
208
6,059
310
(29)
6,350
990
(37)
966
1,067
(59)
1,080
656
157
(229)
635
658
181
(231)
659
(25)
253
(18)
(9)
235
628
1,714
(1,947)
407
59,055
(332)
58,479
59,865
1,488
(2,308)
504
59,549
Warehouse lines of credit
1,676
1,522
1,370
1,486
60,731
(479)
60,001
61,235
1,604
61,035
Republic Processing Group:
(1,454)
1,454
(2,311)
2,311
21,029
3,969
(5,504)
369
19,863
19,452
6,365
(5,022)
327
21,122
2,502
1,837
19,864
4,055
2,638
21,123
81,760
(5,836)
1,918
79,865
80,687
5,659
(7,330)
3,142
82,158
* The CRE loan pool was further segmented into Owner-occupied CRE, Nonowner-occupied CRE, and Multi-family beginning in 2025. For the three months ended September 30, 2024 presented above, the Total CRE line represents the ACLL Roll-forward information for the total CRE loan pool, as previously presented.
Nine Months Ended September 30,
10,849
(80)
10,337
(961)
(62)
103
4,140
(434)
3,047
(143)
7,319
(208)
12,523
(904)
2,714
22,556
(1,061)
25,830
173
336
8,227
6,060
2,527
(24)
4,236
(227)
29
1,061
99
(90)
565
(58)
625
7,378
909
28
5,501
867
1,379
(129)
1,074
133
(190)
63
724
426
154
694
443
(658)
(41)
283
(46)
(33)
501
(1,993)
59,756
(577)
(1,073)
373
58,998
2,767
(3,022)
806
1,374
148
847
639
61,130
(429)
59,845
3,406
9,793
9,947
(24,893)
5,153
3,929
22,249
(32,555)
6,377
(165)
(137)
44
20,987
11,919
(14,142)
1,099
18,295
15,742
(13,882)
967
30,848
21,947
(39,200)
6,269
22,285
38,024
(46,574)
7,388
91,978
(40,273)
6,642
82,130
41,430
(49,596)
8,194
* The CRE loan pool was further segmented into Owner-occupied CRE, Nonowner-occupied CRE, and Multi-family beginning in 2025. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024 presented above, the Total CRE line represents the ACLL Roll-forward information for the total CRE loan pool, as previously presented.
During the first quarter of 2025, the Company further segmented its CRE portfolio into Owner-occupied CRE, Nonowner-occupied CRE, and Multi-family. The Company believes this additional portfolio segmentation will provide better granularity to the ACLL on a go-forward basis. Given the loss history for each of these portfolio segments over the past several years, this additional segmentation did not have a material impact to the Company’s ACLL as of September 30, 2025. This additional segmentation could have material impacts to the ACLL in the future, however, depending upon the overall credit performance of each of these individual portfolios on a go-forward basis.
The cumulative loss rate used as the basis for the estimate of the Company’s ACLL as of September 30, 2025, was primarily based on a static pool analysis of each of the Company’s loan pools using the Company’s loss experience from 2013 through 2024, supplemented by qualitative factor adjustments for current and forecasted conditions. The Company employs one-year forecasts of unemployment and CRE values within its ACLL model, with reversion to long-term averages following the forecasted period. The cumulative loss rate within the Company’s ACLL also includes estimated losses based on an individual evaluation of loans which are either collateral dependent or which do not share risk characteristics with pooled loans, e.g., loan modifications. During the second quarter of 2025, the Company implemented a minimum loan balance threshold, as a practical expedient, for assessing individual loans for impairment. This threshold applies to loans with a risk rating of Special Mention or worse. The application of this new practical expedient resulted in a $518,000 net credit to the Provision during the second quarter of 2025.
Nonperforming Loans and Nonperforming Assets
Detail of nonperforming loans, nonperforming assets, and select credit quality ratios follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Loans on nonaccrual status*
21,572
22,619
Loans past due 90-days-or-more and still on accrual**
137
Total nonperforming loans
21,709
22,760
Total nonperforming assets
22,955
23,920
Credit Quality Ratios - Total Company:
Nonperforming loans to total loans
0.41
%
0.42
Nonperforming assets to total loans (including OREO)
0.43
0.44
Nonperforming assets to total assets
0.33
0.35
Credit Quality Ratios - Core Bank:
0.46
0.39
*
Loans on nonaccrual status include collateral-dependent loans.
**
Loans past due 90-days-or-more and still accruing consist of smaller balance consumer loans.
The following tables present nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90-days-or-more and still on accrual by portfolio class:
Past Due 90-Days-or-More
Nonaccrual
and Still Accruing Interest*
17,510
17,331
126
421
424
799
860
87
56
2,837
2,359
* Loans past due 90-days-or-more and still accruing consist of smaller balance consumer loans.
Interest Income
Loans with
Loans without
Recognized
on Nonaccrual Loans*
364
1,039
119
286
Consumer
765
20,807
535
1,572
* Includes interest income for loans on nonaccrual as of the beginning of the period that were paid off during the period.
September 30, 2024
688
16,643
273
112
524
275
726
134
241
562
101
2,705
19,914
509
1,291
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90-days-or-more and still on accrual both include smaller balance, primarily retail, homogeneous loans. Nonaccrual loans are typically returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and held current for six consecutive months and future contractual payments are reasonably assured. Modified loans classified as nonaccrual are reviewed for return to accrual status on an individual basis, with additional consideration given to performance under modified terms.
Delinquent Loans
The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in loans by portfolio class:
30 - 59
60 - 89
90 or More
Days
September 30, 2025 (dollars in thousands)
Delinquent
Delinquent*
Delinquent**
Current
3,844
1,749
2,013
7,606
1,037,131
548
892
487,894
95
96,489
547
406
1,879
397,812
10,763
58
9,152
5,120
2,192
3,379
10,691
4,547,615
5,157,441
6,880
1,675
136
8,691
104,259
104,551
12,000
3,867
3,515
19,382
5,261,992
Delinquency ratio***
0.23
0.07
0.37
* All loans past due 90-days-or-more, excluding small balance consumer loans, were on nonaccrual status as of September 30, 2025.
** Delinquent status may be determined by either the number of days past due or number of payments past due.
*** Represents total loans 30-days-or-more past due by aging category divided by total loans.
December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands)
2,320
2,292
7,015
1,025,444
318,075
658,972
840,242
104
904
459,341
75
93,229
204
478
1,396
352,045
16,436
809
1,145
9,512
3,386
2,814
3,985
10,185
4,558,994
5,109,754
7,915
2,248
10,304
118,429
309,223
11,301
5,062
4,126
20,489
5,418,977
0.21
0.09
0.08
0.38
* All loans past due 90-days-or-more, excluding smaller balance consumer loans, were on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2024.
Collateral-Dependent Loans
The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent loans by portfolio class:
Secured
by Real
by Personal
Estate
Property
23,116
2,307
149
47,668
707
28,112
Collateral-dependent loans are generally secured by real estate or personal property. If there is insufficient collateral value to secure the Company’s recorded investment in these loans, they are charged down to collateral value less estimated selling costs, when selling costs are applicable. Estimated selling costs range from 10% to 13%, with those percentages based on annual studies performed by the Company.
Loan Modifications Made to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty
The ACLL incorporates an estimate of lifetime expected credit losses using historical loss information. The Company uses a static pool loss rate method to determine an estimate which is recorded for each asset upon origination. Occasionally, the Company has reason to modify certain terms of loans for borrowers experiencing financial distress by providing the following forms of relief: forgiveness of loan principal, extension of repayment terms, interest rate reduction or an other than insignificant payment delay. The Company may make any or all of these types of concessions as part of such modifications. Since an estimate for historical losses is already included as a component of the ACLL, a change to the ACLL is generally not recorded at the time of such modifications unless the loan is individually analyzed and the modification changes the specific reserve allocation. In the event forgiveness of principal is provided, the amount of the forgiveness is charged off against the ACLL.
During the second quarter of 2025, the Company modified one loan for a borrower experiencing financial difficulty with an amortized cost basis of $4 million. The term of the loan was extended 12 months. There were no other material modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company made no material modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, there were no payment defaults by borrowers experiencing financial difficulty related to loans that were modified in the prior 12 months.
Foreclosures
The following table presents the carrying amount of foreclosed properties held as a result of the Bank obtaining physical possession of such properties:
Total other real estate owned
The following table presents the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process according to requirements of the applicable jurisdiction:
Recorded investment in consumer residential real estate mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure
3,294
1,562
The Company’s TRS segment offered (i) its RA product during the first two months of 2025, along with its ERA product during December 2024 for the 2025 Tax Season and (ii) its RA product during the first two months of 2024, along with its ERA product during December 2023 for the 2024 Tax Season. The ERA originations during December 2024 and the first two weeks of 2025 were made in relation to estimated tax returns that were anticipated to be filed during the first quarter 2025 tax season, while the ERA originations during December 2023 and the first two weeks of 2024 were made in relation to estimated tax returns that were anticipated to be filed during the first quarter 2024 tax season. Each year, all unpaid RAs, including ERAs, are charged off by June 30th, and each quarter thereafter, any credits to the Provision for ERAs/RAs, are recorded as recoveries of previously charged-off accounts.
Information regarding calendar year activities for ERAs/RAs follows:
Refund Advances originated
662,556
771,091
Net charge (credit) to the Provision for RAs, including ERAs
Provision as a percentage of RAs originated, including ERAs
1.50
2.89
Refund Advances net charge-offs
19,740
26,178
Refund Advances net charge-offs to total Refund Advances originated
2.98
3.39
5. DEPOSITS
The composition of the deposit portfolio follows:
Core Bank:
Demand
1,143,036
1,166,517
Money market
1,513,646
1,295,024
Savings
214,261
238,596
Reciprocal money market
261,994
212,033
Individual retirement accounts (1)
35,029
34,543
Time deposits, $250 and over (1)
154,240
129,593
Other certificates of deposit (1)
288,553
239,643
Reciprocal time deposits (1)
78,167
80,016
Wholesale brokered deposits (1)
87,383
87,285
Total Core Bank interest-bearing deposits
3,776,309
3,483,250
Total Core Bank noninterest-bearing deposits
1,169,772
1,123,208
Total Core Bank deposits
4,946,081
4,606,458
13,304
199,964
Interest-bearing prepaid card deposits
286,567
296,921
23,142
22,647
Total RPG interest-bearing deposits
323,013
519,532
Noninterest-bearing prepaid card deposits
4,040
2,842
Other noninterest-bearing deposits
65,211
81,714
Total RPG noninterest-bearing deposits
69,251
84,556
Total RPG deposits
392,264
604,088
6. SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
SSUAR consist of short-term excess funds from correspondent banks, repurchase agreements, and overnight liabilities to deposit clients arising from the Bank’s treasury management program. While comparable to deposits in their transactional nature, these overnight liabilities to clients are in the form of repurchase agreements. Repurchase agreements collateralized by securities are treated as financings; accordingly, the securities involved with the agreements are recorded as assets and are held by a safekeeping agent and the obligations to repurchase the securities are reflected as liabilities. Should the fair value of currently pledged securities fall below the associated repurchase agreements, the Bank would be required to pledge additional securities. To mitigate the risk of under collateralization, the Bank typically pledges at least two percent more in securities than the associated repurchase agreements. All such securities are under the Bank’s control.
As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, all SSUAR had overnight maturities. Information regarding SSUAR follows:
Outstanding balance at end of period
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
0.62
0.53
Fair value of securities pledged:
99,438
151,972
Total securities pledged
Average outstanding balance during the period
73,135
73,660
89,755
88,140
Weighted average interest rate during the period
0.63
0.76
0.59
0.61
Maximum outstanding at any month end during the period
79,383
112,826
113,281
35
7. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES
FHLB advances were as follows:
Overnight advances
25,000
Fixed interest rate advances
370,000
Total FHLB advances
Each FHLB advance is payable at its maturity date, with a prepayment penalty for fixed rate advances that are paid off earlier than maturity.
FHLB advances are collateralized by a blanket pledge of eligible real estate loans. As of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, Republic had available borrowing capacity of $743 million and $755 million from the FHLB. In addition to its borrowing capacity with the FHLB, Republic also had unsecured lines of credit totaling $100 million available through various other financial institutions as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024.
Aggregate future principal payments on FHLB advances based on contractual maturity and the weighted-average cost of such advances are detailed below:
Weighted
Average
Year (dollars in thousands)
Principal
Rate
2026
130,000
4.65
2027
80,000
4.01
2028
160,000
4.39
2030
5,000
4.34
As more fully disclosed in the Footnote titled “Interest Rate Swaps,” the Bank elected to extend $100 million of FHLB advances during the second quarter of 2024 through a third-party, fixed rate swap to take advantage of the then-inverted yield curve and lower its overall borrowing costs. As a result of this swap, the Bank was able to lock in an annualized cost of 4.42% for this $100 million over a five-year term. The total weighted-average cost of all advances, including the impact of any corresponding swaps, is 4.34%.
Due to their nature, the Bank considers average balance information more meaningful than period-end balances for its overnight borrowings from the FHLB. Information regarding overnight FHLB advances follows:
17,989
49,707
96,058
5.42
4.47
5.46
55,000
428,000
760,000
The following table illustrates real estate loans pledged to collateralize advances and letters of credit with the FHLB:
First-lien, single family residential real estate
1,133,555
1,177,113
Home equity lines of credit
339,068
312,168
Multi-family commercial real estate
94,854
94,334
Commercial real estate
267,084
330,911
8. OFF BALANCE SHEET RISKS, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Commitments to Extend Credit
The Company, in the normal course of business, is party to financial instruments with off balance sheet risk. These financial instruments primarily include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the potential future obligations of the Company pursuant to those financial instruments. Creditworthiness for all instruments is evaluated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the Company’s credit policies. Collateral from the client may be required based on the Company’s credit evaluation of the client and may include business assets of commercial clients, as well as personal property and real estate of individual clients or guarantors.
The Company also extends binding commitments to clients and prospective clients. Such commitments assure a borrower of financing for a specified period of time at a specified rate. The risk to the Company under such loan commitments is limited by the terms of the contracts. For example, the Company may not be obligated to advance funds if the client’s financial condition deteriorates or if the client fails to meet specific covenants.
An approved but unfunded loan commitment represents a potential credit risk and a liquidity risk, since the Company’s client(s) may demand immediate cash that would require funding. In addition, unfunded loan commitments represent interest rate risk as market interest rates may rise above the rate committed to the Company’s client. Since a portion of these loan commitments normally expire unused, the total amount of outstanding commitments at any point in time may not require future funding.
The following table presents the Company’s commitments, exclusive of mortgage banking loan commitments:
Unused warehouse lines of credit
450,749
404,240
Unused home equity lines of credit
485,364
478,040
Unused loan commitments - other
1,202,096
1,093,990
Standby letters of credit
12,173
11,282
Total commitments
2,150,382
1,987,552
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a client to a third-party. The terms and risk of loss involved in issuing standby letters of credit are similar to those involved in issuing loan commitments and extending credit. In addition to credit risk, the Company also has liquidity risk associated with standby letters of credit because funding for these obligations could be required immediately. The Company does not deem this risk to be material.
The following tables present a roll-forward of the ACLC:
ACLC Roll-forward
Loan Commitments
77
79
195
191
110
Unused construction lines of credit
703
717
591
527
Unused RCS lines of credit
220
290
(26)
332
260
1,500
(20)
1,480
1,110
(110)
1,000
183
55
677
40
820
(293)
300
(75)
251
349
(89)
1,490
1,340
38
9. FAIR VALUE
Fair value represents the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
Authoritative guidance requires maximization of use of observable inputs and minimization of use of unobservable inputs in fair value measurements. Where there exists limited or no observable market data, the Company derives its own estimates by generally considering characteristics of the asset/liability, the current economic and competitive environment, and other factors. For this reason, results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized on an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability.
The Bank used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument:
Available-for-sale debt securities: Except for the Bank’s U.S. Treasury securities, its private label MBS, and its TRUP investment, the fair value of AFS debt securities is typically determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).
The Bank’s U.S. Treasury securities are based on quoted market prices (Level 1 inputs) and considered highly liquid.
The Bank’s private label MBS remains illiquid, and as such, the Bank classifies this security as a Level 3 security in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. Based on this determination, the Bank utilized an income valuation model (present value model) approach in determining the fair value of this security.
See the Footnote titled “Investment Securities” for additional discussion regarding the Bank’s private label MBS.
The Company acquired its TRUP investment in 2015 and considers the most recent bid price for the same instrument to approximate market value as of September 30, 2025. The Company’s TRUP investment is considered highly illiquid and also valued using Level 3 inputs, as the most recent bid price for this instrument is not always considered generally observable.
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value: The fair value of the Company’s Freddie Mac preferred stock is determined based on market prices of similar securities, as described above (Level 2 inputs).
Mortgage loans held for sale, at fair value: The fair value of mortgage loans HFS is determined using quoted secondary market prices. Mortgage loans HFS are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Consumer loans held for sale, at fair value: The fair value for these loans is based on contractual sales terms, Level 3 inputs.
Mortgage banking derivatives: Mortgage banking derivatives used in the ordinary course of business primarily consist of mandatory forward sales contracts (“forward contracts”) and interest rate lock loan commitments. The fair value of the Bank’s derivative instruments is primarily measured by obtaining pricing from broker-dealers recognized to be market participants. The pricing is derived from market observable inputs that can generally be verified and do not typically involve significant judgment by the Bank. Forward contracts and rate lock loan commitments are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Interest rate swap agreements: Interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company values its interest rate swaps using a third-party valuation service and classifies such valuations as Level 2. Valuations of these interest rate swaps are also received from the relevant dealer counterparty and validated against the Company’s calculations. The Company has considered counterparty credit risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap assets and has considered its own credit risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap liabilities.
Discussion of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis follows:
Collateral-dependent loans: Collateral-dependent loans generally reflect partial charge-downs to their respective fair value, which is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals or BPOs. These appraisals or BPOs may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the process by the independent experts to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Non-real estate collateral may be valued using an appraisal, net book value per the borrower’s financial statements or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business, resulting in a Level 3 fair value classification. Collateral-dependent loans are evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.
Other real estate owned: Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals or BPOs. These appraisals or BPOs may utilize a single approach or a combination of approaches, including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the process by the independent experts to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments may be significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.
Appraisals for collateral-dependent loans, impaired premises and OREO are performed by certified general appraisers (for commercial properties) or certified residential appraisers (for residential properties) whose qualifications and licenses have been reviewed and verified by the Bank. Once the appraisal is received, a member of the Bank’s CCAD reviews the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal, as well as the overall resulting fair value in comparison with independent data sources, such as recent market data or industry-wide statistics. On at least an annual basis, the Bank performs a back test of collateral appraisals by comparing actual selling prices on recent collateral sales to the most recent appraisal of such collateral. Back tests are performed for each collateral class, e.g., residential real estate or CRE, and may lead to additional adjustments to the value of unliquidated collateral of similar class.
Mortgage servicing rights: At least quarterly, MSR’s are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the MSR’s as compared to carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an individual tranche exceeds fair value, impairment is recorded, and the respective individual tranche is carried at fair value. If the carrying amount of an individual tranche does not exceed fair value, impairment is reversed if previously recognized and the carrying value of the individual tranche is based on the amortization method. The valuation model utilizes assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income and can generally be validated against available market data (Level 2).
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial assets and liabilities for which the Bank has elected the fair value option, are summarized below.
Fair Value Measurements at
September 30, 2025 Using:
Quoted Prices in
Significant
Active Markets
for Identical
Observable
Unobservable
Assets
Inputs
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Financial assets:
34,750
228,976
802,899
5,522
Equity securities with readily determinable fair value:
Total equity securities with readily determinable fair value
Mortgage loans held for sale
Consumer loans held for sale
Rate lock commitments
475
Interest rate swap agreements - Bank clients and institutional swap dealer
6,745
Financial liabilities:
Mandatory forward contracts
Interest rate swap agreements on FHLB advances
2,907
December 31, 2024 Using:
84,775
304,311
493,796
5,584
223
70
6,588
647
All transfers between levels are generally recognized at the end of each quarter. There were no transfers into or out of Level 1, 2, or 3 assets during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024.
Private Label Mortgage-Backed Security
The following table presents a reconciliation of the Bank’s private label MBS measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
1,489
1,716
1,773
Total gains or losses included in earnings:
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)
54
102
Principal paydowns
(105)
(124)
(210)
1,665
The fair value of the Bank’s single private label MBS is supported by analysis prepared by an independent third-party. The third-party’s approach to determining fair value involved several steps: 1) detailed collateral analysis of the underlying mortgages, including consideration of geographic location, original loan-to-value, and the weighted-average FICO score of the borrowers; 2) collateral performance projections for each pool of mortgages underlying the security (probability of default, severity of default, and prepayment probabilities) and 3) discounted cash flow modeling.
The significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurement of the Bank’s single private label MBS are prepayment rates, probability of default, and loss severity in the event of default. Significant fluctuations in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly different fair value measurement.
Quantitative information about recurring Level 3 fair value measurement inputs for the Bank’s single private label MBS follows:
Valuation Technique
Unobservable Inputs
Range (1)
Discounted cash flow
(1) Constant prepayment rate
3.4% - 4.3%
(2) Probability of default
0.4% - 6.1%
(3) Loss severity
25%
(1) The bank owns one private label mortgage-back security; therefore, the range presented is equivalent to the weighted average range.
Valuation
Technique
1.5% - 2.6%
0.5% - 9.1%
Trust Preferred Security
The following table presents a reconciliation of the Company’s TRUP investment measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
4,075
4,092
4,118
Discount accretion
(21)
(85)
(12)
4,023
The fair value of the Company’s TRUP investment is based on the most recent bid price for this instrument, as provided by a third-party broker.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
The Bank has elected the fair value option for mortgage loans HFS. These loans are intended for sale and the Bank believes that the fair value is the best indicator of the resolution of these loans. Interest income is recorded based on the contractual terms of the loans and in accordance with Bank policy for such instruments. None of these loans were past due 90-days-or-more or on nonaccrual as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024.
The aggregate fair value, contractual balance, and unrealized gain were as follows:
Aggregate fair value
Contractual balance
14,786
8,117
Unrealized gain
552
The total amount of net gains from changes in fair value included in earnings for mortgage loans HFS, at fair value, are presented in the following table:
Interest income
179
520
Change in fair value
376
357
Total included in earnings
559
877
633
Consumer Loans Held for Sale
RCS carries loans originated through its installment loan program at fair value. Interest income is recorded based on the contractual terms of the loan and in accordance with Bank policy for such instruments. None of these loans were past due 90-days-or-more or on nonaccrual as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024.
The significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurement of the Bank’s short-term installment loans are the net contractual premiums and level of loans sold at a discount price. Significant fluctuations in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower/higher fair value measurement.
The following table presents quantitative information about recurring Level 3 fair value measurement inputs for installment loans:
Contract Terms
(1) Net Premium
0.15%
(2) Discounted Sales
10.00%
The aggregate fair value, contractual balance, and unrealized gain on consumer loans HFS, at fair value, were as follows:
8,504
5,476
Unrealized loss
(60)
The total amount of net gains from changes in fair value included in earnings for consumer loans HFS, at fair value, follows:
2,215
1,464
4,957
3,995
(27)
2,213
1,477
4,930
4,005
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
Collateral-dependent loans:
305
Total collateral-dependent loans
644
Other real estate owned:
Residential real estate
201
The following tables present quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
Range
(Weighted
Average)
Collateral-dependent loans - residential real estate owner-occupied
Appraisal
Appraisal discounts
10% (10%)
Collateral-dependent loans - commercial real estate owner-occupied
13% (13%)
Other real estate owned - commercial real estate nonowner-occupied
10-63% (53%)
3% (3%)
Other real estate owned - commercial real estate
57% (57%)
Collateral-dependent loans are generally measured for loss using the fair value for reasonable disposition of the underlying collateral. The Bank’s practice is to obtain new or updated appraisals or BPOs on the loans subject to the initial review and then to evaluate the need for an update to this value on an as necessary or possibly annual basis thereafter (depending on the market conditions impacting the value of the collateral). The Bank may discount the valuation amount as necessary for selling costs and past due real estate taxes. If a new or updated appraisal or BPO is not available at the time of a loan’s loss review, the Bank may apply a discount to the existing value of an old valuation to reflect the property’s current estimated value if it is believed to have deteriorated in either: (i) the physical or economic aspects of the subject property or (ii) material changes in market conditions. The review generally results in a partial charge-off of the loan if fair value, less selling costs, are below the loan’s carrying value. Collateral-dependent loans are valued within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, the Provision recorded for collateral-dependent loans was not material.
OREO, which is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, is periodically assessed for impairment based on fair value at the reporting date. Fair value is determined from external appraisals or BPOs using judgments and estimates of external professionals. Many of these inputs are not observable and, accordingly, these measurements are classified as Level 3.
Detail of OREO carrying value and write downs follows:
Other real estate owned carried at fair value
Total carrying value of other real estate owned
Other real estate owned write-downs during the period
52
Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts and estimated exit price fair values of financial instruments follows:
September 30, 2025:
Carrying
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets:
Available-for-sale debt securities
Held-to-maturity debt securities
Equity securities with readily determinable fair values
16,498
5,106,317
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
20,797
Mortgage servicing rights
6,798
16,941
Liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing deposits
Transaction deposits
3,442,646
Time deposits
656,676
646,284
379,059
4,483
December 31, 2024:
18,714
5,209,571
20,128
6,975
17,159
3,231,738
771,044
773,415
395,814
10. MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES
Mortgage banking activities primarily include residential mortgage originations and servicing.
Activity for mortgage loans HFS, at fair value, was as follows:
8,850
9,703
3,227
59,494
57,142
152,515
136,894
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans held for sale
(54,716)
(59,732)
(150,093)
(202,198)
Net gain on mortgage loans held for sale
1,710
1,413
4,604
2,430
8,526
The following table presents the components of mortgage banking income:
Net gain realized on sale of mortgage loans held for sale
1,529
1,325
4,166
3,010
Fair value adjustment for correspondent loans reclassified to held for sale
(997)
Net change in fair value recognized on loans held for sale
Net change in fair value recognized on rate lock loan commitments
(226)
90
Net change in fair value recognized on forward contracts
(171)
Net gain recognized
Loan servicing income
833
1,071
2,483
2,825
(422)
(1,306)
(1,271)
Net servicing income recognized
354
649
1,554
Total mortgage banking income
Activity for capitalized MSR’s was as follows:
6,841
7,030
7,411
Additions
436
445
Amortized to expense
7,053
There was no valuation allowance for capitalized MSR’s for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024.
Other information relating to MSR’s follows:
Fair value of mortgage servicing rights portfolio
Monthly weighted average prepayment rate of unpaid principal balance*
125
Discount rate
9.84
10.25
Weighted average foreclosure rate
0.12
0.06
Weighted average life in years
7.28
7.51
Rates are applied to individual tranches with similar characteristics.
Mortgage banking derivatives used in the ordinary course of business primarily consist of mandatory forward sales contracts and interest rate lock loan commitments. Mandatory forward contracts represent future commitments to deliver loans at a specified price and date and are used to manage interest rate risk on loan commitments and mortgage loans HFS. Interest rate lock loan commitments represent commitments to fund loans at a specific rate. These derivatives involve underlying items, such as interest rates, and are designed to transfer risk. Substantially all of these instruments expire within 90 days from the date of issuance. Notional amounts are amounts on which calculations and payments are based, but which do not represent credit exposure, as credit exposure is limited to the amounts required to be received or paid.
Mandatory forward contracts also contain an element of risk in that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of such agreements. In the event the counterparties fail to deliver commitments or are unable to fulfill their obligations, the Bank could potentially incur significant additional costs by replacing the positions at then current market rates. The Bank manages its risk of exposure by limiting counterparties to those banks and institutions deemed appropriate by management and the Board of Directors. The Bank does not expect any counterparty to default on their obligations and therefore, the Bank does not expect to incur any cost related to counterparty default.
The Bank is exposed to interest rate risk on loans HFS and rate lock loan commitments. As market interest rates fluctuate, the fair value of mortgage loans HFS and rate lock commitments will decline or increase. To offset this interest rate risk the Bank enters into derivatives, such as mandatory forward contracts to sell loans or purchase TBA securities. The fair value of these mandatory forward contracts will fluctuate as market interest rates fluctuate, and the change in the value of these instruments is expected to largely, though not entirely, offset the change in fair value of loans HFS and rate lock commitments. The objective of this activity is to minimize the exposure to losses on rate loan lock commitments and loans HFS due to market interest rate fluctuations. The net effect of derivatives on earnings will depend on risk management activities and a variety of other factors, including market interest rate volatility; the amount of rate lock commitments that close; the ability to fill the forward contracts before expiration; and the time period required to close and sell loans.
The following table includes the notional amounts and fair values of mortgage loans HFS and mortgage banking derivatives:
Notional
Included in Mortgage loans held for sale:
Included in other assets:
Rate lock loan commitments
27,438
12,592
18,776
Included in other liabilities:
37,066
49
11. INTEREST RATE SWAPS
Interest rate swap derivatives are reported at fair value in other assets or other liabilities. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies for hedge accounting as part of a cash flow hedging relationship. For a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative’s unrealized gain or loss is recorded as a component of OCI. The amount included in AOCI would be reclassified to current earnings should the hedge no longer be considered effective. Derivatives not designated as hedges are economic derivatives with the gain or loss recognized in current period earnings.
Interest Rate Swaps Used as Cash Flow Hedges
The Bank entered into three interest rate swap agreements during the second quarter of 2024 related to FHLB advances tied to 1-month SOFR. The counterparty for all three swaps met the Bank’s credit standards and the Bank believes that the credit risk inherent in the swap contracts is not significant. As of August 8, 2024 the Bank designated the swaps to be effective for hedge accounting purposes. The Bank expects the hedges to remain fully effective during the remaining term of the swaps.
The following tables reflect information about swaps designated as cash flow hedges:
Bank Position
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances - Other liabilities and accrued interest payable
Pay fixed/receive variable
100,000
(2,907)
(647)
Pay
Receive
Assets /
Gain (Loss)
(Liabilities)
in AOCI
4.14
1M SOFR
5/2024 - 6/2029
(2,180)
The following table reflects the total interest expense recorded on these swap transactions in the consolidated statements of income:
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances
Total interest (benefit) expense on swap transactions
The following table presents the net gains (losses) recorded in OCI and the consolidated statements of income relating to the swaps designated as cash flow hedges:
Losses recognized in OCI on derivative (effective portion)
Losses reclassified from OCI on derivative (effective portion)
289
380
Gains (losses) recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion)
Non-hedge Interest Rate Swaps
The Bank also enters into interest rate swaps to facilitate client transactions and meet their financing needs. Upon entering into these instruments, the Bank enters into offsetting positions in order to minimize the Bank’s interest rate risk. These swaps are derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments, and therefore changes in fair value are reported in current year earnings.
Interest rate swap contracts involve the risk of dealing with counterparties and their ability to meet contractual terms. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is positive, this generally indicates that the counterparty or client owes the Bank, and results in credit risk to the Bank. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is negative, the Bank owes the client or counterparty, and therefore, has no credit risk.
A summary of the Bank’s interest rate swaps related to clients is included in the following table:
Interest rate swaps with Bank clients - Other assets and accrued interest receivable
Pay variable/receive fixed
165,550
4,159
103,707
1,070
Interest rate swaps with Bank clients - Other liabilities and accrued interest payable
74,436
(2,586)
128,621
(5,518)
Interest rate swaps with Bank clients - Total
239,986
1,573
232,328
(4,448)
Offsetting interest rate swaps with institutional swap dealer - Other assets and accrued interest receivable
2,586
5,518
Offsetting interest rate swaps with institutional swap dealer - Other liabilities and accrued interest payable
(4,159)
(1,070)
Offsetting interest rate swaps with institutional swap dealer - Total
(1,573)
4,448
479,972
464,656
The Bank and its counterparties are required to pledge securities or cash as collateral when either party is in a net loss position exceeding $250,000 with the other party. As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Bank’s counterparties had cash of $0 and $4 million pledged to the Bank, which were included in Interest-bearing deposits on the Company’s Balance Sheet. Conversely, the Bank had $5 million and $0 pledged to its counterparties as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, which were included in Cash and cash equivalents on the Company’s Balance Sheet.
12. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company calculates EPS under the two-class method. Under the two-class method, earnings available to common shareholders for the period are allocated between Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The difference in EPS between the two classes of common stock results from the 10% per share cash dividend premium paid on Class A Common Stock over that paid on Class B Common Stock.
A reconciliation of the combined Class A and Class B Common Stock numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computations follows:
Class A Shares
Class B Shares
Undistributed net income for basic earnings per share
21,061
18,740
82,448
58,978
Weighted average potential dividends on Class A shares upon exercise of dilutive options
(94)
(88)
Undistributed net income for diluted earnings per share
21,035
18,707
82,354
58,890
Weighted average shares outstanding:
17,583
17,504
17,584
17,487
Effect of dilutive securities on Class A Shares outstanding
69
72
Weighted average shares outstanding including dilutive securities
19,791
19,735
19,803
19,709
Basic earnings per share:
Class A Common Stock:
Per share dividends distributed
0.45
1.35
1.22
Undistributed earnings per share*
1.08
0.96
4.22
3.03
Total basic earnings per share - Class A Common Stock
Class B Common Stock:
1.23
1.11
0.98
0.88
3.84
2.76
Total basic earnings per share - Class B Common Stock
Diluted earnings per share:
1.07
4.20
3.02
Total diluted earnings per share - Class A Common Stock
0.87
3.82
2.74
Total diluted earnings per share - Class B Common Stock
To arrive at undistributed earnings per share, undistributed net income is first prorated between Class A and Class B Common Shares, with Class A Common Shares receiving a 10% premium. The resulting pro-rated, undistributed net income for each class is then divided by the weighted average shares for each class.
Stock options excluded from the detailed EPS calculation because their impact was antidilutive are as follows:
Antidilutive stock options
38,422
22,388
Average antidilutive stock options
35,912
13. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
OCI components and related tax effects were as follows:
Available-for-Sale Debt Securities:
(817)
(2,376)
(2,942)
(3,050)
Net of tax
2,458
7,127
8,833
9,145
Derivatives:
Net losses
(3,423)
(2,260)
(3,960)
Tax effect
856
(2,567)
(1,695)
(2,970)
Total other comprehensive income components, net of tax
The following is a summary of the AOCI balances, net of tax:
Change
Unrealized gain (loss) on AFS debt securities
(13,753)
(4,920)
Unrealized loss on derivatives
(485)
Total unrealized gain (loss)
December 31, 2023
(11,263)
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives
14. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
The following tables present the Company’s net revenue and net revenue concentration by reportable segment:
Core Banking
Tax
Republic
Traditional
Core
Refund
Payment
Credit
Banking
Lending
Solutions
Company
Net interest income (1)
57,424
3,805
61,229
280
3,193
12,268
Noninterest income:
3,625
Mortgage banking income (1)
3,012
Program fees (1)
781
4,107
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI (1)
Net losses on OREO
818
10,523
1,155
782
4,108
6,045
Total net revenue
67,926
3,826
71,752
1,435
3,975
16,376
21,786
93,538
Net-revenue concentration (2)
76
51,023
3,580
54,603
440
2,783
13,479
16,702
3,676
3,692
3,267
786
4,176
1,300
155
11,078
11,094
609
933
4,177
5,719
62,101
3,596
65,697
1,049
3,716
17,656
22,421
88,118
167,125
10,382
177,507
30,154
10,750
37,449
78,353
10,546
10,610
9,213
91
2,283
10,878
Gain on sale of Visa Class B-1 Shares (1)
4,191
36,312
36,376
17,825
2,285
10,880
30,990
203,437
10,446
213,883
47,979
13,035
48,329
109,343
323,226
66
149,197
8,751
157,948
32,173
9,221
37,418
78,812
10,488
10,530
9,697
2,319
11,220
3,034
218
29,421
29,463
15,378
2,468
11,223
29,069
178,618
8,793
187,411
47,551
11,689
48,641
107,881
295,292
The following represents information for significant revenue streams subject to ASC 606:
Service charges on deposit accounts – The Company earns revenue for account-based and event-driven services on its retail and commercial deposit accounts. Contracts for these services are generally in the form of deposit agreements, which disclose fees for deposit services. Revenue for event-driven services is recognized in close proximity or simultaneously with service performance. Revenue for certain account-based services may be recognized at a point in time or over the period the service is rendered, typically no longer than a month. Examples of account-based and event-driven service charges on deposits include per item fees, stop payment fees, paper-statement fees, check-cashing fees, below balance fees, check upcharge fees and analysis fees.
Net refund transfer fees – An RT is a fee-based product offered by the Bank through third-party tax preparers located throughout the U.S., as well as tax-preparation software providers (collectively, the “Tax Providers”), with the Bank acting as an independent contractor of the Tax Providers. An RT allows a taxpayer to pay any applicable tax preparation and filing related fees directly from his federal or state government tax refund, with the remainder of the tax refund disbursed directly to the taxpayer. RT fees and all applicable tax preparation, transmitter, audit, and any other taxpayer authorized amounts are deducted from the tax refund by either the Bank or the Bank’s service provider and automatically forwarded to the appropriate party as authorized by the taxpayer. RT fees generally receive first priority when applying fees against the taxpayer’s refund, with the Bank’s share of RT fees generally superior to the claims of other
third-party service providers, including the Tax Providers. The remainder of the refund is disbursed to the taxpayer by a Bank check, direct deposit to the taxpayer’s personal bank account, or loaded to a prepaid card.
The Company presents RT revenue net of any amounts shared with the Tax Providers. The Bank’s share of RT revenue is generally based on the obligations undertaken by the Tax Provider for each individual RT program, with more obligations generally corresponding to higher RT revenue share. The significant majority of net RT revenue is recognized and obligations under RT contracts fulfilled by the Bank during the first half of each year. Incremental expenses associated with the fulfilment of RT contracts are generally expensed during the first half of each year.
Interchange fee income – As an “issuing bank” for card transactions, the Company earns interchange fee income on transactions executed by its cardholders with various third-party merchants. Through third-party intermediaries, merchants compensate the Company for each transaction for the ability to efficiently settle the transaction, and for the Company’s willingness to accept certain risks inherent in the transaction. There is no written contract between the merchant and the Company, but a contract is implied between the two parties by customary business practices. Interchange fee income is recognized almost simultaneously by the Company upon the completion of a related card transaction.
The Company compensates its cardholders by way of cash or other “rewards” for generating card transactions. These rewards are disclosed in cardholder agreements between the Company and its cardholders. Reward costs are accrued over time based on card transactions generated by the cardholder. Interchange fee income is presented net of reward costs within noninterest income.
Net gains/(losses) on other real estate – The Company routinely sells OREO it has acquired through loan foreclosure. Net gains/(losses) on OREO reflect both 1) the gain or loss recognized upon an executed deed and 2) mark-to-market write-downs the Company may record on its OREO inventory.
The Company generally recognizes gains or losses on OREO at the time of an executed deed, although gains may be recognized over a financing period if the Company finances the sale. For financed OREO sales, the Company assesses whether the buyer is committed to perform their obligations under the contract and whether collectability of the transaction price is probable. Once these criteria are met, the OREO asset is derecognized and the gain or loss on sale is recorded upon the transfer of control of the property to the buyer. In determining the gain or loss on sale, the Company adjusts the transaction price and related gain/(loss) on sale if a significant financing component is present.
Mark-to-market write-downs taken by the Company during the holding period are generally at least 10% per year but may be higher based on updated real estate appraisals or BPOs. Incremental expenditures to bring OREO to salable condition are generally expensed as-incurred.
15. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Reportable segments are determined by the type of products and services offered and the level of information provided to the chief operating decision maker, who uses such information to review performance of various components of the business (such as banking centers and business units), which are then aggregated if operating performance, products/services, and clients are similar.
As of September 30, 2025, the Company was divided into five reportable segments: Traditional Banking (which includes the results of the former mortgage banking segment), Warehouse Lending, TRS, RPS, and RCS. Management considers the first two segments to collectively constitute “Core Bank” or “Core Banking” operations, while the last three segments collectively constitute RPG operations.
The nature of segment operations and the primary drivers of net revenue by reportable segment are provided below:
Reportable Segment:
Nature of Operations:
Primary Drivers of Net Revenue:
Core Banking:
Traditional Banking
Provides traditional banking products to clients in its market footprint primarily via its network of banking centers and to clients outside of its market footprint primarily via its digital delivery channels.
Net interest income
Warehouse Lending
Provides short-term, revolving credit facilities to mortgage bankers across the United States.
Tax Refund Solutions
Offers tax-related credit products and facilitates the receipt and payment of federal and state tax refunds through Refund Transfer products. TRS products are primarily provided to clients outside of the Bank’s market footprint.
Net interest income and Net refund transfer fees
Republic Payment Solutions
Offers general-purpose reloadable cards. RPS products are primarily provided to clients outside of the Bank’s market footprint.
Net interest income and Program fees
Offers consumer credit products. RCS products are primarily provided to clients outside of the Bank’s market footprint, with a substantial portion of RCS clients considered subprime or near-prime borrowers.
The accounting policies used for Republic’s reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Segment performance is evaluated using operating income before income taxes. Goodwill is allocated to the Traditional Banking segment. Income taxes are generally allocated based on income before income tax expense unless specific segment allocations can be reasonably made.
Transactions among reportable segments are made at carrying value. Net Interest income is reflected within each applicable business segment based on the underlying financial instruments assigned to each segment as well as the impact of the Company’s internal FTP applied to each instrument. FTP is allocated from the Traditional Bank to each segment based on the assumed terms of the underlying financial instruments within that segment in combination with applicable market interest rates matching the assumed terms of each instrument.
Segment information follows:
Provision for expected credit loss expense
(1,467)
Other noninterest income (1)
8,438
8,459
8,499
26,446
719
27,165
1,855
916
1,091
3,862
Technology, Equipment, and Communication
7,556
7,604
96
984
3,442
3,476
1,614
1,054
Other noninterest expense (2)
7,039
7,183
74
7,704
46,194
47,139
2,348
1,105
3,161
6,614
Income (loss) before income tax expense
22,057
3,035
25,092
554
2,870
9,246
12,670
Income tax expense (benefit)
4,591
684
5,275
624
2,024
2,743
Net income (loss)
17,466
2,351
19,817
459
2,246
7,222
9,927
Period-end assets
5,952,561
610,155
6,562,716
22,673
310,220
119,310
452,203
Period-end loans
Period-end deposits
4,909,513
36,568
22,612
59,432
Net interest margin
3.89
2.62
3.78
4.06
Net-revenue concentration*
1,605
(2,310)
9,016
9,032
175
9,207
24,564
697
25,261
1,744
756
1,031
3,531
6,423
6,467
999
1,077
3,085
3,125
85
642
165
1,176
1,341
6,552
6,660
7,066
41,266
889
42,155
2,251
947
3,256
6,454
Income before income tax expense
19,346
2,591
21,937
1,108
2,769
8,035
11,912
Income tax expense
4,189
584
4,773
595
2,533
15,157
2,007
17,164
919
2,174
6,286
9,379
5,559,357
595,624
6,154,981
26,503
367,857
143,129
537,489
6,692,470
4,566,896
595,163
5,162,059
302
134,556
134,858
5,296,917
4,616,573
37,015
4,653,588
26,412
367,432
54,264
448,108
5,101,696
3.61
2.70
3.53
4.91
4.49
* Net revenue represents net interest income plus total noninterest income. Net-revenue concentration equals segment-level net revenue divided by total Company net revenue.
(1) Other noninterest income includes Service charges on deposit accounts, Interchange fee income, Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI, Net losses on OREO and Other noninterest income.
(2) Other noninterest expense includes FDIC insurance expense, Interchange related expense, Legal and professional fees, and Other noninterest expense.
NM – Not Meaningful
10,028
26,441
26,505
248
26,757
78,570
2,147
80,717
6,016
2,818
3,346
12,180
22,430
128
22,558
413
2,996
3,479
10,196
10,290
3,052
2,021
20,492
399
20,891
1,239
441
296
1,976
22,867
140,733
2,768
143,501
8,075
3,344
8,674
20,093
63,281
7,530
70,811
29,876
9,691
27,736
67,303
13,247
1,697
14,944
6,494
2,109
6,071
14,674
50,034
5,833
55,867
23,382
7,582
21,665
52,629
2.60
3.73
4.31
5.18
2,762
3,401
22,282
25,437
25,479
25,796
73,831
2,130
75,961
6,015
2,382
11,690
19,289
19,397
298
2,675
2,977
10,072
10,153
2,084
299
4,199
4,528
19,096
375
19,471
1,915
482
254
2,651
22,122
124,372
2,694
127,066
8,787
2,919
10,442
22,148
51,484
5,460
56,944
16,482
8,770
22,457
47,709
10,417
1,231
11,648
3,699
1,930
5,021
10,650
41,067
4,229
45,296
12,783
6,840
17,436
37,059
3.49
2.64
3.43
5.01
4.92
(1) Other noninterest income includes Service charges on deposit accounts, Interchange fee income, Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI, Net losses on OREO, and Other noninterest income.
59
16. LOW-INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT INVESTMENTS
The Company is a limited partner in several low-income housing partnerships whose purpose is to invest in qualified affordable housing. The Company expects to recover its remaining investments in these partnerships through the use of tax credits that are generated by the investments. These investments are included in other assets and accrued interest receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with any unfunded obligations included in other liabilities and accrued interest payable. The investments are amortized as a component of income tax expense.
The following table summarizes information related to the Company’s qualified low-income housing investments and obligations:
Unfunded
Investment
Accounting Method
Investments
Obligations (2)
Obligations (1)
Low-income housing tax credit - Gross
Proportional amortization
91,469
42,743
72,415
54,797
Life-to-date amortization
(28,308)
(21,899)
Low-income housing tax credit - Net
63,161
50,516
The following table summarizes the amortization expense and tax credits recognized in income tax expense for the Company’s qualified low-income housing investments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively:
Amortization expense
2,097
1,616
6,409
4,795
Tax credits recognized
(3,117)
(2,363)
(9,095)
(7,215)
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Republic Bancorp, Inc. (the “Parent Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Republic Bank & Trust Company. As used in this filing, the terms “Republic,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Republic Bancorp, Inc., and, where the context requires, Republic Bancorp, Inc., and its subsidiary. The term the “Bank” refers to the Company’s subsidiary bank, Republic Bank & Trust Company, as well as, its wholly owned subsidiary, RBT Insurance Agency LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Republic should be read in conjunction with Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the statement. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “conclude,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “foresee,” “goal,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “outlook,” “possible,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “seek,” “should,” “target,” “will,” “will likely,” “would,” or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry, management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond Management’s control.
Forward-looking statements detail management’s expectations regarding the future and are based on information known to management only as of the date the statements are made and management undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date forward-looking statements are made, except as required by applicable law.
There is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements include, among other things:
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATE
For disclosure regarding the impact to the Company’s financial statements of ASUs, see the Footnote titled, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Republic’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported periods.
A summary of the Company's significant accounting policies is set forth in Part II “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
ended December 31, 2024.
Management continually evaluates the Company’s accounting policies and estimates that it uses to prepare the consolidated financial statements. In general, management’s estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience, accounting and regulatory guidance, and information obtained from independent third-party professionals. Actual results may differ from those estimates made by management.
Critical accounting policies are those that management believes are the most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and operating results and require management to make estimates that are difficult, subjective, and complex. Most accounting policies are not considered by management to be critical accounting policies. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical in the preparation of the financial statements. These factors include, among other things, whether the estimates have a significant impact on the financial statements, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information including independent third-parties or available pricing, sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and
whether alternative methods of accounting may be utilized under GAAP. Management has discussed each critical accounting policy and the methodology for the identification and determination of critical accounting policies with the Company’s Audit Committee.
Republic believes its critical accounting policies and estimates relate to its ACLL and Provision.
ACLL and Provision — As of September 30, 2025, the Bank maintains an ACLL for expected credit losses inherent in the Bank’s loan portfolio, which includes overdrawn deposit accounts. Management evaluates the adequacy of the ACLL monthly and presents and discusses the ACLL with the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors quarterly.
Management’s evaluation of the appropriateness of the ACLL is often the most critical accounting estimate for a financial institution, as the ACLL requires significant reliance on the use of estimates and significant judgment as to the reliance on historical loss rates, consideration of quantitative and qualitative economic factors, and the reliance on a reasonable and supportable forecast.
Within the ACLL model, the Company utilizes a static pool method. This method analyzes historical closed pools of loans over their expected lives to attain a loss rate, which is then adjusted for current conditions and reasonable, supportable forecasts prior to being applied to the current balance of the analyzed pools. Due to its reasonably strong correlation to the Company's historical net loan losses, the Company has chosen to use the U.S. national unemployment rate as its primary forecasting tool. For its CRE loan pool, the Company employs a one-year forecast of general CRE values.
Adjustments to the historical loss rate for current conditions include differences in underwriting standards, portfolio mix or term, delinquency level, as well as for changes in environmental conditions, such as changes in property values or other relevant factors. One-year forecast adjustments to the historical loss rate are based on the U.S. national unemployment rate and CRE values. Subsequent to the one-year forecasts, loss rates are assumed to immediately revert back to long-term historical averages.
The impact of utilizing the CECL approach to calculate the ACLL is significantly influenced by the composition, characteristics, and quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, as well as the prevailing economic conditions and forecasts utilized. Material changes to these and other relevant factors may result in greater volatility to the ACLL, and therefore, greater volatility to the Company’s reported earnings.
During the first quarter of 2025, the Company further segmented its CRE portfolio into Owner-occupied CRE, Nonowner-occupied CRE, and Multi-family. The Multi-family portfolio consists of properties with five or more dwelling units in structures (including apartment buildings) used primarily to accommodate households on a more-or-less permanent basis. The Company believes this additional portfolio segmentation will provide better granularity to the ACLL in the future. Given the loss history for each of these portfolio segments over the past several years, this additional segmentation did not have a material impact to the Company’s ACLL. This additional segmentation could have material impacts to the ACLL in the future, however, depending upon the overall credit performance of each of these individual portfolios on a go-forward basis.
During the second quarter of 2025, the Company implemented a minimum loan balance threshold, as a practical expedient, for assessing individual loans for impairment. This threshold applies to loans with a risk rating of Special Mention or worse. The application of this new practical expedient resulted in a $518,000 net credit adjustment to the Provision during the second quarter of 2025.
Other sources of Traditional Banking income include service charges on consumer and commercial deposit accounts, mortgage banking income, debit and credit card interchange fee income, title insurance commissions, swap fee income and increases in the cash surrender value of BOLI.
Traditional Bank lending activities consist of the following:
Retail Mortgage Lending — Through its retail banking centers and its online Consumer Direct channel, the Bank originates single-family residential real estate loans and HELOCs. In addition, the Bank originates HEALs through its retail banking centers. Such loans are generally collateralized by owner-occupied, residential real estate properties. For those loans originated through the Bank’s retail banking centers, the collateral is predominately located in the Bank’s market footprint, while loans originated through its Consumer Direct channel are generally secured by owner-occupied collateral located outside of the Bank’s market footprint.
During 2023, the Bank purchased a block of single-family, first-lien residential real estate loans for investment through its Correspondent Lending Channel, with these loans secured by owner-occupied collateral generally located outside of the Bank’s market footprint. During the first quarter of 2024, Management elected to sell $67 million of this portfolio, with the sale completed during the second quarter of the same year.
The Bank offers single-family, first-lien residential real estate ARMs with interest rate adjustments tied to various market indices with specified minimum and maximum adjustments. The Bank generally charges a premium interest rate for its ARMs if the property is nonowner-occupied. The interest rates on the majority of ARMs are adjusted after their fixed rate periods on an annual or semi-annual basis, with most having annual and lifetime limitations on upward rate adjustments to the loan. These loans typically feature amortization periods of up to 30 years and have fixed interest-rate periods generally ranging from five to ten years, with demand dependent upon market conditions. While there is no requirement for clients to refinance their loans at the end of the fixed-rate period, clients have historically done so the majority of the time, as most clients are interest-rate-risk averse on first-lien mortgage loans.
Single-family, first-lien residential real estate loans with fixed-rate periods of 15, 20, and 30 years are primarily originated and sold into the secondary market. MSR’s attached to the sold portfolio are either sold along with the loan or retained. Loans sold into the secondary market, along with their corresponding MSR’s, are included as a component of the Company’s Traditional Banking segment, as discussed elsewhere in this filing. The Bank, as it has in the past, may retain such longer-term, fixed-rate loans from time to time in the future to help combat NIM compression. Any such loans retained on the Company’s balance sheet would be reported as a component of the Traditional Banking segment.
As part of the sale of loans with servicing retained, the Bank records MSR’s. MSR’s represent an estimate of the present value of future cash servicing income, net of estimated costs, which the Bank expects to receive on loans sold with servicing retained by the Bank. MSR’s are capitalized as separate assets. This transaction is posted to net gain on sale of loans, a component of noninterest income under “mortgage banking income” in the income statement. Management considers all relevant factors, in addition to pricing considerations from other servicers, to estimate the fair value of the MSR’s to be recorded when the loans are initially sold with servicing retained by the Bank. The carrying value of MSR’s is initially amortized in proportion to and over the estimated period of net servicing income. MSR amortization is recorded as a reduction to net servicing income, a component of “mortgage banking income.”
With the assistance of an independent third-party, the MSR’s asset is reviewed at least quarterly for impairment based on the fair value of the MSR’s using groupings of the underlying loans based on predominant risk characteristics. Any impairment of a grouping is reported as a valuation allowance. A primary factor influencing the fair value is the estimated remaining life of the underlying loans serviced which is significantly influenced by market interest rates. During a period of declining interest rates, the fair value of the MSR’s is expected to decline due to increased anticipated prepayment speeds within the portfolio. Alternatively, during a period of rising interest rates, the fair value of MSR’s would be expected to increase as prepayment speeds on the underlying loans would be expected to decline.
The Bank does, on occasion, purchase single-family, first-lien residential real estate loans made to low-to-moderate income borrowers and/or secured by property located in low-to-moderate income areas, which assists the Bank in meeting its obligations under the CRA. In connection with loan purchases, the Bank receives various representations and warranties from the sellers regarding the quality and characteristics of the loans.
Commercial Lending — As described in detail below, the Bank conducts commercial lending activities primarily through the following groups/divisions: Corporate Banking, CRE Banking, Commercial Banking, Business Banking, Private Banking, and Retail Banking channels and clients are primarily located within the Bank’s market footprint or in an adjoining market. In general, all commercial lending credit approvals and processing are prepared and underwritten through the Bank’s centralized CCAD.
Credit opportunities are generally driven by the following: companies expanding their businesses; companies acquiring new businesses; and/or companies refinancing existing debt from other institutions. The Bank has a primary focus on C&I lending, CRE, and multi-family lending.
C&I loans typically include those secured by general business assets, which consist of equipment, accounts receivable, inventory, and other business assets owned by the borrower/guarantor. Credit facilities include annually renewable LOCs and term loans with maturities typically ranging from three to five years and may also involve financial covenant requirements. These requirements are monitored by the Bank’s CCAD. Underwriting for C&I loans is based upon the borrower’s capacity to
repay these loans from operating cash flows, typically measured by EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), with capital strength, collateral, and management experience also important underwriting considerations. The targeted C&I credit size for client relationships is typically between $1 million and $10 million, with higher targets between $10 million and $35 million targeted by the Corporate Banking group.
CRE and multi-family loans are typically secured by improved property such as office buildings, medical facilities, retail centers, warehouses, apartment buildings, condominiums, schools, religious institutions, and other types of commercial use property. The CRE Banking group, which launched in 2022, focuses on large CRE projects, typically in amounts from $5 million to $25 million. Borrowers are generally single-asset entities and the underlying collateral is nonowner-occupied. Primary underwriting considerations are cash flow projections (current and historical), financial capacity of sponsors, and collateral value financed. Fixed rate financing and reciprocal interest rate swaps are used as well. Given the size of these credits, the Bank generally seeks established, well-known borrowers and projects with low credit risk.
The Commercial Banking group focuses on small and medium sized C&I and CRE Owner-occupied opportunities. Borrowers are generally single-asset entities and loan sizes typically range from $1 million to $5 million. As with Corporate Banking, the primary underwriting considerations are cash flow projections (current and historical), quality of leases, financial capacity of sponsors, and collateral value of property financed. Interest rates offered are based on both fixed and variable interest-rate formulas.
The Business Banking group, reporting under Retail Banking in most markets, focuses on locally based small businesses in the Bank’s market footprint with primary annual revenues up to $10 million and borrowings between $350,000 and $1 million. The needs of these clients range from expansion or acquisition financing, equipment financing, owner-occupied real estate financing, and smaller operating lines of credit.
The Bank is an SBA Preferred Lending Partner, which allows the Bank to underwrite and approve its own SBA loans in an expedited manner. The Bank makes loans to borrowers generally up to $3 million under both the SBA “7A Program” and the “504 Program” for CRE Owner-occupied opportunities. The Bank utilizes these programs to reduce credit risk exposure.
Construction & Land Development Lending — The Bank originates business loans for the construction of both single-family, residential properties and commercial properties (apartment complexes, shopping centers and office buildings) to borrowers primarily located within the Bank’s market footprint or in an adjoining market. While not a major focus for the Bank, the Bank may originate loans for the acquisition and development of residential or commercial land into buildable lots.
Single-family, residential-construction loans are made in the Bank’s market area to established homebuilders with solid financial records. The majority of these loans are made for “contract” homes that the builder has already pre-sold to a homebuyer.
Commercial-construction loans are made in the Bank’s market to established commercial builders/developers with solid financial records. Typically, these loans are made for investment properties and have tenants pre-committed for some or all of the space. Generally, commercial-construction loans are made for the duration of the construction period and slightly beyond and will either convert to permanent financing with the Bank or with another lender at or before maturity.
Construction-to-permanent loans are another type of construction-related financing that the Bank offers. These loans are made to borrowers who are going to build a property and retain it for ownership after construction completion. These loans are offered on both owner-occupied and nonowner-occupied CRE.
Consumer Lending — Traditional Banking consumer loans include home improvement and home equity loans, other secured and unsecured personal loans, and credit cards originated to borrowers primarily located within the Bank’s market footprint or in an adjoining market. In 2024, the Traditional Bank ceased originating new consumer credit cards and sold its $5 million portfolio in the second quarter of 2025. Except for home equity loans, which are actively marketed in conjunction with single family, first lien residential real estate loans, other Traditional Banking consumer loan products while available, are not and have not been actively promoted in the Bank’s markets.
Aircraft Lending — Aircraft loans are typically made to purchase or refinance personal aircrafts, along with engine overhauls and avionic upgrades with borrowers across the U.S. Loans typically range between $200,000 and $4 million in size and have terms up to 20 years. The credit characteristics of an aircraft borrower are higher than a typical consumer in that they must demonstrate and indicate a higher degree of credit worthiness for approval.
Correspondent Lending — During 2014, 2015 and 2023, the Bank purchased select blocks of single family, first-lien mortgage loans for investment from Warehouse Lending clients through its Correspondent Lending channel. These loans were purchased at a premium that is amortized into interest income over the expected life of the loan utilizing the level-yield. Loans acquired through the Correspondent Lending channel are generally made to borrowers outside of the Bank’s historical market footprint. During the first quarter of 2024, Management elected to sell $67 million of the loans purchased in 2023 and the sale was completed during the second quarter of 2024.
The Bank’s other Traditional Banking activities generally consist of the following:
Private Banking — The Bank provides financial products and services to high-net-worth individuals through its Private Banking department. The Bank’s Private Banking officers have extensive banking experience and are trained to meet the unique financial needs of this clientele.
Treasury Management Services — The Bank provides various deposit products designed for commercial business clients located throughout its market footprint. Lockbox processing, remote deposit capture, business on-line banking, account reconciliation, and ACH processing are additional services offered to commercial businesses through the Bank’s Treasury Management department. Treasury Management officers work closely with commercial and retail officers to support the cash management needs of Bank clients.
Internet Banking — The Bank expands its market penetration and service delivery of its RB&T brand by offering clients Internet Banking services and products through its website, www.republicbank.com.
Mobile Banking — The Bank allows clients to securely access and manage their accounts through its mobile banking application.
Other Banking Services — The Bank also provides title insurance and other financial institution related products and services.
Bank Acquisitions — The Bank maintains an acquisition strategy to selectively grow its franchise as a complement to its organic growth strategies.
See additional detail regarding the Traditional Banking segment under the Footnote titled, “Segment Information” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
See additional detail regarding the Warehouse Lending segment under the Footnote titled, “Segment Information” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
(III) Tax Refund Solutions segment
Through the TRS segment, the Bank facilitates the receipt and payment of federal and state tax refund products and offers a credit product through third-party tax preparers located throughout the U.S., as well as tax-preparation software providers that offer Republic Bank RTs, RAs and ERAs, collectively, the “Tax Providers”). The majority of the business generated by the TRS business occurs during the first half of each year. During the second half of each year, TRS generates limited revenue and incurs costs preparing for the next year’s tax season. During December 2024 and 2023, TRS originated ERAs related to tax returns that were anticipated to be filed during the first quarter of the following tax filing season.
RTs are fee-based products whereby a tax refund is issued to the taxpayer after the Bank has received the refund from the federal or state government. There is no credit risk or borrowing cost associated with these products because they are only delivered to the taxpayer upon receipt of the tax refund directly from the governmental paying authority. An RT allows a taxpayer to pay any applicable tax preparation and filing related fees directly from his federal or state government tax refund, with the remainder of the tax refund disbursed directly to the taxpayer. RT fees and all applicable tax preparation, transmitter, audit, and any other taxpayer authorized amounts are deducted from the tax refund by either the Bank or the Bank’s service provider and automatically forwarded to the appropriate party as authorized by the taxpayer. RT fees generally receive first priority when applying fees against the taxpayer’s refund, with the Bank’s share of RT fees generally superior to the claims of other third-party service providers, including the Tax Providers. The remainder of the refund is disbursed to the taxpayer by a Bank check, direct deposit to the taxpayer’s personal bank account, or loaded to a prepaid card.
The Company presents RT revenue net of any amounts shared with the Tax Providers. The Bank’s share of RT revenue is generally based on the obligations undertaken by the Tax Provider for each individual RT program, with more obligations generally corresponding to higher RT revenue share. The significant majority of net RT revenue is recognized and obligations under RT contracts fulfilled by the Bank during the first half of each year. Incremental expenses associated with the fulfilment of RT contracts are generally expensed during the first half of each year. Fees earned by the Company on RTs, net of revenue share, are reported as noninterest income under the line item “Net refund transfer fees.”
Since its introduction in December of 2022, the ERA loan product has been structured similarly to the RA, with the primary differences being the timing of when the ERAs are originated and the documentation available to underwrite the ERAs. The ERA is originated prior to the taxpayer receiving their fiscal year taxable income documentation, e.g., W-2, and the filing of the taxpayer’s final federal tax return. As such, the Company generally uses paystub information to underwrite the ERA. The repayment of the ERA is incumbent upon the taxpayer client returning to the Bank’s Tax Provider for the filing of their final federal tax return in order for the tax refund to
potentially be received by the Bank from the federal government to pay off the advance. The ERA product had the following features during the 2024 and 2025 Tax Seasons:
The Company reports fees paid for ERAs/RAs, as “Interest income on loans.” The number of days for delinquency eligibility is based on management’s annual analysis of tax return processing times. RAs, including ERAs that were originated related to the first quarter 2024 tax filing season were repaid, on average, within 32 days after the taxpayer’s tax return was submitted to the applicable taxing authority. Since ERAs/RAs do not have a contractual due date, the Company considered the advance delinquent during 2025 if it remained unpaid 35 days after the taxpayer’s tax return was submitted to the applicable taxing authority.
Provisions on ERAs/RAs are estimated when advances are made. Unpaid ERAs/RAs, related to the first quarter tax filing season of a given year are considered delinquent at June 30th of that year and charged-off. In addition, as of June 30, 2025, RAs that were subject to Tax Provider loan loss guarantees were charged-off and immediately recorded as recoveries of previously charged-off loans with corresponding receivables recorded in other assets for the Tax Provider guarantees. Corresponding receivables are settled during the third quarter of each year. RAs collected during the second half of each year, not subject to loan loss guarantee arrangements, are recorded as recoveries of previously charged-off loans.
Related to the overall credit losses on ERAs/RAs, the Bank’s ability to control losses is highly dependent upon its ability to predict the taxpayer’s likelihood to receive the tax refund as claimed on the taxpayer’s tax return. In addition, the Bank’s ability to control losses for the ERA product is highly dependent upon the taxpayer returning to a Tax Provider for the filing of their final tax return. Each year, the Bank’s ERA/RA approval model is based primarily on the prior-year’s tax refund payment patterns. Because the substantial majority of the ERA/RA volume occurs each year before that year’s tax refund payment patterns can be analyzed and subsequent underwriting changes implemented, credit losses during a year could be higher than management’s predictions if tax refund payment patterns change materially between years.
In response to changes in the legal, regulatory, and competitive environment, management annually reviews and revises the ERA/RA product parameters. Changes in product parameters do not ensure positive results and could have an overall material negative impact on the performance of all ERA/RA product offerings and therefore on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
See additional detail regarding the ERA/RA product under the Footnotes titled “Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans” and “Segment Information” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
See additional detail regarding the RPS segment under the Footnote titled, “Segment Information” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
Through the Bank, the RCS segment offers consumer credit products. In general, the credit products are unsecured, small dollar consumer loans that are dependent on various factors. RCS loans typically earn a higher yield but also have higher credit risk compared to loans originated through the Traditional Banking segment, with a significant portion of RCS clients considered subprime or near-prime borrowers. Ordinary gains or losses on the sale of RCS products are reported as a component of “Program fees.” Through the Bank, RCS uses third-party service providers for certain services such as marketing and loan servicing for RCS’s (1) LOC products, (2) Installment loan product and (3) Healthcare receivables products.
Through RCS, the Bank offers installment loans with terms ranging from 12 to 60 months to borrowers in multiple states. The same third-party service provider for RCS’s LOC II is the third-party provider for the installment loan product. This third-party provider is subject to the Bank’s oversight and supervision and provides the Bank with marketing services and loan servicing for these RCS installment loans. The Bank is the lender for these loans and is marketed as such. Furthermore, the Bank controls the loan terms and underwriting guidelines, and the Bank exercises consumer compliance oversight of this RCS installment loan product. Currently, all loan balances originated under this RCS installment loan program are carried as HFS on the Bank’s balance sheet, with the intent to sell to a third-party, who is an affiliate of the Bank’s third-party service provider, generally within 16 days following the Bank’s origination of the loans. Loans originated under this RCS installment loan program are carried at fair value under a fair-value option, with the portfolio marked to market monthly.
See additional detail regarding the RCS segment under the Footnote titled, “Segment Information” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act
On July 4, 2025, new tax legislation referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act was enacted into law by the federal government. The tax provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act did not have a material impact on the Company’s income tax expense. The retroactive extension of bonus depreciation and the repeal requiring the capitalization of research and development expenditures has afforded the Company additional income tax deductions for 2025, reducing the anticipated income taxes payable for 2025.
Expiration of Largest TRS Tax Provider Contract
As previously disclosed, the Company’s largest Tax Provider contract within TRS in terms of product volume expired in October 2025 and the Company did not enter into a new contract with this Tax Provider to replace its existing contract. In total, the Company estimates that this Tax Provider will represent approximately $6 million of TRS segment pre-tax net income over the 12 month period from December 1, 2024, through November 30, 2025.
All ERAs/RAs originated through TRS occur during the three month period of December through February each year. ERAs/ RAs originated through this Tax Provider represented approximately 63% of the total dollars of ERAs/RAs originated through TRS from December 2024 through February 2025. As a result of these originations, ERA/RA fee income reported in interest income on loans related to this Tax Provider represented 63%, 49% and 89% of the total ERA/RA fee income reported for TRS during the second quarter of 2025, the first six months of 2025, and the fourth quarter of 2024. In addition, Provision expense for ERAs/RAs originated through this Tax Provider represented 72%, 56% and 96% of the total Provision reported for TRS during the second quarter of 2025, the first six months of 2025, and the fourth quarter of 2024. Provision for the second quarter of 2025 was a net credit for both TRS, as a whole, and for ERAs/RAs originated through this Tax Provider.
Net RT revenue generated through this Tax Provider during the second quarter and first six months of 2025 represented approximately 6% and 20% of total net RT revenue generated through TRS for the respective periods. Net RT revenue during the fourth quarter of 2024 was nominal.
OVERVIEW (Three Months Ended September 30, 2025, Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2024)
Total Company net income for the third quarter of 2025 was $29.7 million, an increase of $3.2 million, or 12%, over the same period in 2024. Diluted EPS increased 11% to $1.52 for the third quarter of 2025 compared to $1.37 for the same period in 2024.
The following were the most significant components comprising the total Company’s net income fluctuation by reportable segment:
Traditional Banking segment
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Three Months Ended September 30, 2025, Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2024)
Net Interest Income
See the section titled “Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk” in this section of the document regarding the Bank’s interest rate sensitivity.
Banking operations are significantly dependent upon net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities and the interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities used to fund those assets, such as interest-bearing deposits, SSUAR and FHLB advances. Net interest income is impacted by both changes in the amount and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as market interest rates.
On September 18, 2025, the FRB lowered the FFTR by 25 basis points bringing the FFTR to 4.25% as of September 30, 2025. Prior to this, the FFTR was lowered 50 basis points in late September 2024, and an additional 25 basis points in both November and December of the same year. Since April 2025, when the President proposed the implementation of broad-based sweeping tariffs against many of the U.S.’s global trading partners, there have been numerous policy changes and events that have triggered ongoing financial volatility, including the recent shutdown of the federal government. While the FRB is currently maintaining the FFTR at a range of 4.00% to 4.25%, recent FOMC commentary has indicated additional possible rate cuts in the fourth quarter of 2025.
Total Company net interest income was $77.0 million during the third quarter of 2025 compared to $71.3 million during the third quarter of 2024, representing a $5.7 million or 8% increase. Total Company NIM increased 16 basis points to 4.65% during the third quarter of 2025 compared to 4.49% during the third quarter of 2024.
The following were the most significant components comprising the total Company’s net interest income and NIM fluctuations by reportable segment:
Traditional Bank net interest income was $57.4 million for the third quarter of 2025, a $6.4 million, or 13%, increase from $51.0 million achieved during the third quarter of 2024. The increase in net interest income was primarily driven by period-over-period growth in average interest-earning assets and NIM expansion.
Traditional Bank NIM increased from 3.61% during the third quarter of 2024 to 3.89% during the third quarter of 2025, consistent with the slight rise in its interest-earning asset yields and significant decrease in cost of funds.
Items of note impacting the Traditional Bank’s change in net interest income and NIM between the third quarter of 2024 and the third quarter of 2025 were as follows:
Management believes that continued reductions to the FFTR will likely not benefit the Traditional Bank’s net interest income and NIM. The amount of such impact to the Traditional Bank’s net interest income and NIM resulting from the most recent change and any future changes to the FFTR will be dependent upon many factors including, but not limited to, the magnitude of the continuing shift from noninterest-bearing deposits into interest-bearing deposits, the actual steepness and shape of the yield curve, future demand for the Company’s financial products, the Company’s ability to lower its deposit costs in conjunction with, and in line with the magnitude to, the decreases to the FFTR, as well as the Company’s overall future liquidity needs.
For additional discussion of the factors impacting interest-earning cash and deposit balances as well as deposit betas, see sections titled “Cash and Cash Equivalents” and “Deposits” in the “COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION” section of the filing.
Warehouse Lending net interest income increased $225,000, or 6%, from the third quarter of 2024 to the third quarter of 2025, as total interest income decreased $493,000, or 5%, and total interest expense decreased $718,000, or 10%. While Warehouse NIM and loan yields declined 8 basis points and 102 basis points, respectively, during the third quarter of 2024 compared to the same period in 2025, average outstanding balances grew $47 million, or 9%. Average committed Warehouse lines of credit increased from $940 million for the third quarter of 2024 to $1.06 billion for the third quarter 2025 and average LOC usage fluctuated from 56% to 54% during the same periods.
Because consumer mortgage demand drives the usage of Warehouse LOCs, overall LOC usage for the Warehouse segment has historically been sensitive to changes in interest rates on the long-end of the yield curve. As a result, a decreasing interest rate environment for the long-end of the yield curve could positively impact Warehouse demand if the long-term interest rate declines are substantial. Alternatively, if interest rates only decline on the short-end of the yield curve, Warehouse demand would not likely be materially impacted.
Net interest income from the Company’s prepaid card division increased $410,000, or 15%, from the third quarter of 2024 to the third quarter of 2025. Driving this increase at RPS was a reduction in the segment’s revenue share component, as its largest marketer-servicer did not achieve the minimal contractual thresholds for average deposit balances in order to earn a revenue share for the third quarter of 2025. By contrast, this revenue share totaled $1.3 million during the third quarter of 2024 and was recorded as interest expense in the segment’s income statement. At this time, Management is uncertain how much the revenue share component may be in the future, as deposit balances originated through this marketer-servicer are at levels near the thresholds necessary to achieve a revenue share, making a future revenue share possible, but not certain.
Partially offsetting the positive benefit of the decreased revenue share, RPS earned a lower yield of 4.06% for its $324 million average of prepaid program balances for the third quarter of 2025 compared to a yield of 4.91% for the $351 million in average prepaid card balances for the third quarter of 2024. The lower earnings rate was primarily driven by a decrease in the FFTR of 125 basis points over the past 12 months.
Historically, overall customer prepaid card demand has not been interest rate sensitive, and therefore management does not believe a changing interest rate environment would impact origination volume for these products. A declining interest rate environment, however, would likely negatively impact the Company’s internal FTP credit allocated to this segment more than it would impact any revenue share the Company pays, decreasing the segment's NIM. The exact amount of the impact would depend on the final internal FTP cost assigned, as well as the overall volume.
RCS’s net interest income decreased $1.2 million, or 9%, from the third quarter of 2024 to the third quarter of 2025. The decline in net interest income was primarily driven by the period-to-period decrease in average outstanding loan balances related to the LOC II product and hospital receivable programs.
Historically, overall customer demand for RCS consumer loan products has not been interest rate sensitive, and therefore management does not believe a changing interest rate environment would materially impact origination volume for these products. A declining interest rate environment, however, would likely positively impact the Company’s internal FTP cost allocated to this segment, increasing the segments NIM. The exact amount of the impact would depend on the final internal FTP cost assigned, as well as the overall volume and mix of loans the segment generates.
.
The following table presents average balances along with the related calculations of tax-equivalent net interest income, NIM and net interest spread for the related periods.
Table 1 — Total Company Average Balance Sheets and Interest Rates
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold and other interest-earning deposits
476,681
5,292
4.40
457,797
6,172
5.36
Investment securities, including FHLB stock (a)
806,304
8,272
4.07
593,449
4,780
3.20
RCS LOC products (b)
45,764
12,123
105.10
46,805
12,935
109.94
Other RPG loans
90,362
1,591
6.99
106,634
2,133
7.96
Outstanding Warehouse lines of credit
575,273
10,180
7.02
528,363
10,672
8.04
Traditional Bank loans (c)
4,569,970
65,781
5.71
4,579,371
64,854
5.63
Total loans (d)
5,281,369
6.74
5,261,173
6.85
Total interest-earning assets
6,564,354
6.24
6,312,419
6.40
(81,196)
(81,567)
Noninterest-earning assets:
Noninterest-earning cash and cash equivalents
82,616
82,969
37,557
33,319
109,381
105,974
Other assets (a)
279,166
258,704
Total assets
6,991,878
6,711,818
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Transaction accounts
1,667,600
2,600
1,754,355
5,882
1.33
Money market accounts
1,490,557
10,969
2.92
1,215,354
10,770
463,657
4,363
390,413
3,952
4.03
Reciprocal money market and time deposits
334,939
2,763
3.27
372,725
4,030
4.30
Brokered deposits
122,172
1,399
4.54
87,231
1,168
5.33
Total interest-bearing deposits
4,078,925
2.15
3,820,078
2.69
SSUARs and other short-term borrowings
372,283
4.33
387,989
4.41
Total interest-bearing liabilities
4,524,343
2.30
4,281,727
2.81
Noninterest-bearing liabilities and Stockholders’ equity:
1,254,609
1,313,207
131,269
140,761
Stockholders’ equity
1,081,657
976,123
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Net interest spread
3.94
3.59
The following table illustrates loan fees recorded as interest income on loans by segment:
Table 2 — Loan Fee Income
Three months ended September 30,
1,393
1,518
392
Total Core Bank
1,757
1,910
Total RPG
12,140
12,977
Total loan fees - Total Company
13,897
14,887
The following table illustrates the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities impacted Republic’s interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect to (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), (ii) changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume), and (iii) net change. The changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.
Table 3 — Total Company Volume/Rate Variance Analysis
Compared to
Total Net
Increase / (Decrease) Due to
Volume
Interest income:
(880)
(1,128)
Investment securities, including FHLB stock
3,492
1,991
1,501
RCS LOC products
(812)
(286)
(526)
(542)
(305)
(237)
(492)
905
(1,397)
Traditional Bank loans
927
1,062
Net change in interest income
1,693
2,418
(725)
Interest expense:
(3,282)
(280)
(3,002)
199
(2,016)
411
(296)
(1,267)
(382)
(885)
420
(189)
(239)
(173)
(66)
Net change in interest expense
(3,972)
2,506
(6,478)
Net change in net interest income
5,665
5,753
For additional discussion regarding Provision, see the sections titled “Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans” and “Asset Quality” in this section of the filing.
Total Company Provision was a net charge of $2.0 million for the third quarter of 2025 compared to a net charge of $5.7 million for the same period in 2024.
The following were the most significant components comprising the total Company’s Provision fluctuation by reportable segment:
The Traditional Banking Provision during the third quarter of 2025 was a net credit of $325,000 compared to a net charge of $1.5 million for the third quarter of 2024.
The net credit for the third quarter of 2025 was primarily driven by the following:
The net charge for the third quarter of 2024 was primarily driven by the following:
As a percentage of total Traditional Bank loans, the Traditional Banking ACLL was 1.28% as of September 30, 2025, compared to 1.31% as of December 31, 2024, and 1.30% as of September 30, 2024.
The Company believes, based on information presently available, that it has adequately provided for Traditional Banking loan losses as of September 30, 2025.
Warehouse recorded a net credit to the Provision of $154,000 for the third quarter of 2025 compared to a net charge of $116,000 for the same period in 2024. Provision for both periods reflected changes in general reserves consistent with changes in outstanding period-end balances. Outstanding Warehouse period-end balances decreased $62 million during the third quarter of 2025 compared to an increase of $46 million during the third quarter of 2024.
As a percentage of total Warehouse outstanding balances, the Warehouse ACLL was 0.25% as of September 30, 2025, December 31, 2024, and September 30, 2024.
The Company believes, based on information presently available, that it has adequately provided for Warehouse loan losses as of September 30, 2025.
Substantially all TRS Provision in both periods was related to its ERA/RA products.
TRS recorded a net credit to the Provision of $1.5 million during the third quarter of 2025 compared to a net credit of $2.3 million for the same period in 2024 related primarily to a decline in recoveries of prior period charge-offs. TRS experienced notably better paydowns of RAs during the first six months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 which has led to fewer recovery opportunities during the third quarter of 2025, as compared to the third quarter of 2024.
ERAs/RAs related to the first quarter 2025 tax filing season were only originated during December of 2024 and the first two months of 2025, while ERAs/RAs related to the first quarter 2024 tax filing season were only originated during December of 2023 and the first two months of 2024. As is the case each year, as of March 31st the ACLL related to ERAs/RAs represented an estimate to be finalized on June 30th when all uncollected ERAs/RAs are ultimately charged-off. ERAs/RAs collected during the second half of each year are recorded as recoveries of previously charged-off loans unless they are covered under a loss guaranty arrangement. ERAs/RAs subject to a loss guaranty arrangement that are recovered during the second half of each year are distributed to the guarantor.
The Company believes, based on information presently available, that it has adequately provided for TRS loan losses as of September 30, 2025.
See additional detail regarding ERAs/RAs under the Footnote titled “Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements” and “Business Segment Composition” in this section of the filing.
There is no ACLL or Provision for RPS, as the segment offers prepaid and debit solutions to consumers.
As illustrated in the following table, RCS recorded a net charge to the Provision of $4.0 million during the third quarter of 2025 compared to a net charge of $6.4 million for the same period in 2024. RCS recorded net loan charge-offs of $5.1 million and $4.7 million during the third quarters of 2025 of 2024. The remainder of the Provision fluctuation was generally in-line with average outstanding balances, with higher balances in the prior year leading to higher reserve build. RCS ending loan balances decreased by $16 million during the first nine months of 2025, driven primarily by declines in the healthcare receivables programs.
While RCS loans generally return higher yields, they also present a greater credit risk than Traditional Banking loan products. As a percentage of total RCS loans, the RCS ACLL was 17.59% as of September 30, 2025, 16.30% as of December 31, 2024, and 15.70% as of September 30, 2024. The RCS segment continued to experience a change in loan mix, growing in categories with higher loan loss reserve requirements thus driving its higher ACLL for the quarter.
The Company believes, based on information presently available, that it has adequately provided for RCS loan losses as of September 30, 2025.
The following table presents net charges to the RCS Provision by product:
Table 4 — Republic Credit Solutions Provision by Product
$ Change
% Change
Product:
Lines of credit
3,980
6,351
(2,371)
Healthcare receivables
(11)
(2,396)
(38)
Table 5 — Summary of Loan and Lease Loss Experience
ACLL at beginning of period
Charge-offs:
(278)
(2,237)
Other TRS loans
Total charge-offs
Recoveries:
131
Total recoveries
Net loan recoveries (charge-offs)
(3,918)
(4,188)
Provision - Core Bank Loans
Provision - RPG Loans
Total Provision for All Loans
ACLL at end of period
ACLL to total loans
1.51
1.55
ACLL to nonperforming loans
368
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans
0.29
0.32
Credit Quality Ratios - Core Banking:
1.16
1.18
278
315
0.02
0.14
Table 6 — Annualized Net Loan Charge-offs (Recoveries) to Average Loans by Loan Category
Net Loan Charge-Offs (Recoveries) to Average Loans
(0.01)
Multi-Family
0.04
0.68
0.24
74.02
80.85
7.32
(9.87)
72.14
0.16
Refund Advances*
16.93
3.40
10.69
1.73
* All loss rates above are based on net charge-offs as a function of average outstanding portfolio balances. RAs are originated during the first two months of each year, with all RAs charged-off by June 30th of each year. Due to their relatively short life, RA net charge-offs are typically analyzed by the Company as a percentage of total RA originations, not as a percentage of average outstanding balances.
Total Company’s net charge-offs to average total Company loans decreased from 0.32% during the third quarter of 2024 to 0.29% during the third quarter of 2025, with net charge-offs decreasing $270,000, or 6%, and average total Company loans increasing $252 million, or 4%.
During the third quarter of 2024, the Traditional Bank recorded $1.9 million in charge-offs related to three linked, broker-related marine loans. The Company discontinued originating broker-related marine loans during the third quarter of 2024. During the first quarter of 2025, the Traditional Bank recorded a $1.6 million insurance recovery to noninterest income associated with these loans.
Noninterest Income
Total Company noninterest income decreased $245,000, or 1%, during the third quarter of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.
The following were the most significant components comprising the total Company’s net interest income fluctuation by reportable segment:
Traditional Banking’s noninterest income decreased $576,000, or 5%, from the third quarter of 2024 compared to the third quarter of 2025.
Other noninterest income decreased $481,000 from the third quarter of 2024 to the third quarter of 2025. During the third quarter of 2024, the Company recorded $610,000 of annual card volume incentives, while the 2025 annual incentives, which totaled $781,000, were not received and recorded until October 2025.
The Traditional Bank earns a substantial majority of its fee income related to its overdraft service program from the per item fee it assesses its customers for each insufficient-funds check or electronic debit presented for payment. The total per item fees, net of refunds, included in service charges on deposits for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024 were $1.8 million and $2.0 million. The total daily overdraft charges, net of refunds, included in interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024 were $312,000 and $328,000.
TRS’s noninterest income increased $546,000, or 90%, from $609,000 for the third quarter of 2024 to $1.2 million for the third quarter of 2025, led primarily by a $535,000 increase in Net RT fees associated with final TRS rebate calculations.
Noninterest Expense
Total Company noninterest expense increased $5.1 million, or 11%, during the third quarter of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. The following were the most significant components comprising the total Company’s net interest expense fluctuation by reportable segment:
Traditional Banking noninterest expense increased $4.9 million, or 12%, for the third quarter of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, primarily driven by the following:
Noninterest expense at the RCS segment decreased $95,000, or 3%, during the third quarter of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, driven primarily by a $169,000 reduction in marketing and development expenses, which generally fluctuate in-line with overall origination volume. Under the terms of the Company’s contract with its LOC II marketer-servicer, RCS reimburses the marketer-servicer a certain dollar amount for marketing costs based on each new line of credit originated during the period.
82
OVERVIEW (Nine months ended September 30, 2025, Compared to Nine months ended September 30, 2024)
Total Company net income for the first nine months of 2025 was $108.5 million, a $26.1 million, or 32%, increase from the same period in 2024. Diluted EPS increased 32% to $5.55 for the first nine months of 2025 compared to $4.24 for the same period in 2024.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Nine months ended September 30, 2025, Compared to Nine months ended September 30, 2024)
See the section titled “Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk” in this section of the filing regarding the Bank’s interest rate sensitivity.
On September 18, 2025, the FRB lowered the FFTR by 25 basis points bringing the FFTR to 4.25% as of September 30, 2025. Prior to this, the FFTR was lowered 50 basis points in late September 2024, and an additional 25 basis points in both November and December of the same year. Since April 2025, when the President proposed the implementation of broad-based sweeping tariffs against many of the U.S.’s global trading partners, there have been numerous policy changes and events that have triggered ongoing financial volatility, including the recent shutdown of the Federal government. While the FRB is currently maintaining the FFTR at a range of 4.00% to 4.25%, recent FOMC commentary has indicated additional possible rate cuts in the fourth quarter of 2025.
Total Company net interest income was $255.9 million during the first nine months of 2025 and represented an increase of $19.1 million, or 8%, from the first nine months of 2024. NIM increased to 5.18% during the first nine months of 2025 from 4.92% for the first nine months of 2024.
Traditional Bank net interest income was $167.1 million for the first nine months of 2025, a $17.9 million, or 12%, increase from $149.2 million for the first nine months of 2024. The increase in net interest income was primarily driven by period-over-period growth in average interest-earning assets and NIM expansion.
Traditional Bank NIM increased from 3.49% during the first nine months of 2024 to 3.84% for the first nine months of 2025, consistent with the rise in its interest-earning asset yields and significant decrease in cost of funds.
Items of note impacting the Traditional Bank’s change in net interest income and NIM between the first nine months of 2024 and the first nine months of 2025 were as follows:
Warehouse Lending net interest income increased $1.6 million, or 19%, from the first nine months of 2024 to the first nine months of 2025, as total interest income increased $1.6 million, or 6%, and total interest expense decreased $19,000. While Warehouse NIM and loan yields declined 4 basis points and 100 basis points, respectively, during the first nine months of 2024 compared to the same period in 2025, average outstanding balances grew $92 million, or 21%, driving the overall increase in net interest income. Average committed Warehouse lines of credit increased from $936 million for the first nine months of 2024 to $1.01 billion for first nine months of 2025 and average LOC usage increased from 47% to 53% during the same periods.
TRS’s net interest income decreased $2.0 million, or 6%, from the first nine months of 2024 to the first nine months of 2025. Loan-related interest and fees decreased $3.0 million, or 8%, for the first nine months of 2025, consistent with the 8% decline in total ERA/RA volume for the 2025 tax filing season. In addition, TRS received a $560,000 payment during the third quarter of 2024 representing a Tax Provider yield enhancement for the RA program to offset the Company’s higher funding costs. This yield enhancement was new for the 2024 tax season and eliminated for the 2025 tax season.
86
Net interest income from the Company’s prepaid card division increased $1.5 million, or 17%, for the first nine months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024. Driving this increase at RPS was a reduction in the segment’s revenue share component for the first nine months of 2025, as its largest marketer-servicer did not achieve the minimal contractual thresholds for average deposit balances in order to earn a revenue share for the current year. By contrast, this revenue share totaled $3.6 million during the first nine months of 2024 and was recorded as interest expense in the segment’s income statement. At this time, Management is uncertain how much the revenue share component may be in the future, as deposit balances originated through this marketer-servicer are at levels near the thresholds necessary to achieve a revenue share, making a future revenue share possible, but not certain.
Partially offsetting the positive benefit of the decreased revenue share, RPS earned a lower yield of 4.31% applied to the $349 million average of prepaid program balances for the first nine months of 2025 compared to a yield of 5.01% for the $362 million in average prepaid card balances for the first nine months of 2024. The lower earnings rate was driven primarily by a decrease in the FFTR of 125 basis points from September of 2024 to September of 2025.
Table 7 — Total Company Average Balance Sheets and Interest Rates
538,644
17,879
4.44
435,189
17,795
704,701
19,929
665,151
15,360
3.08
TRS Refund Advance loans (b)
99,988
33,332
44.57
107,742
35,436
43.93
45,844
36,794
107.31
43,398
35,579
109.51
107,723
5,137
6.38
120,280
7,455
8.28
533,979
27,973
7.00
442,217
26,489
8.00
4,577,673
194,236
5.67
4,612,204
191,764
5,365,207
7.41
5,325,841
7.44
6,608,552
6.78
6,426,181
6.86
Allowance for credit loss
(96,320)
(95,352)
198,110
155,169
34,458
33,553
108,472
105,138
275,358
254,126
7,128,630
6,878,815
1,700,931
7,824
1,802,805
17,935
1,415,628
30,627
1,134,374
29,228
3.44
440,808
12,503
3.79
383,626
11,392
3.97
316,771
7,863
3.32
339,495
10,776
193,373
6,505
4.50
230,496
9,240
5.35
4,067,511
3,890,796
420,476
4.36
409,854
4.61
4,577,742
2.32
4,388,790
2.83
1,355,572
1,389,759
141,767
145,883
1,053,549
954,383
Total liabilities and stock-holders’ equity
4.46
88
Table 8 — Loan Fee Income
Nine months ended September 30,
4,051
4,165
1,043
977
5,094
5,142
33,717
36,669
70,511
72,248
75,605
77,390
Table 9 — Total Company Volume/Rate Variance Analysis
3,779
(3,695)
4,569
954
3,615
TRS Refund Advance loans*
(2,104)
(2,577)
473
1,215
1,972
(757)
(2,318)
(721)
(1,597)
1,484
5,058
(3,574)
2,472
(1,440)
3,912
5,402
7,025
(1,623)
(10,111)
(959)
(9,152)
6,529
(5,130)
1,111
1,637
(2,913)
(683)
(2,230)
(2,735)
(1,365)
(1,370)
(439)
(798)
(13,698)
5,525
(19,223)
19,100
17,600
* Since interest income for RAs is composed entirely of loan fees and RAs are only offered during the first two months of each year, volume and rate measurements for this product are not a meaningful metric for the periods presented above.
89
For additional discussion regarding Provision, see the sections titled “Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans” and “Asset Quality” in the “COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION” section of the filing.
Total Company Provision was a net charge of $21.5 million for the first nine months of 2025 compared to a net charge of $41.4 million for the same period in 2024.
The Traditional Banking Provision during the first nine months of 2025 was a net credit of $577,000 compared to a net charge of $2.8 million for the first nine months of 2024.
The net credit for the first nine months of 2025 was primarily driven by the following:
The net charge for the first nine months of 2024 was primarily driven by the following:
As a percentage of total Traditional Bank loans, the Traditional Banking ACLL was 1.28% as of September 30, 2025, compared to 1.31% as of December 31, 2024 and 1.30% as of September 30, 2024.
Warehouse recorded a net charge to the Provision of $148,000 for the first nine months of 2025 compared to a net charge of $639,000 for the same period in 2024. Provision for both periods reflected changes in general reserves consistent with changes in outstanding period-end balances. Outstanding Warehouse period-end balances increased $59 million during the first nine months of 2025 compared to an increase of $255 million during the first nine months of 2024.
As a percentage of total Warehouse outstanding balances, the Warehouse ACLL was 0.25% as of September 30, 2025, December 31, 2024, and September 30, 2024. The Company believes, based on information presently available, that it has adequately provided for Warehouse loan losses as of September 30, 2025.
TRS recorded a net charge to the Provision of $10.0 million during the first nine months of 2025 compared to a net charge of $22.3 million for the same period in 2024.
During the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company revised its agreement with its largest third-party marketer-servicer for ERAs/RAs for the 2025 Tax Season. In addition to a new loss cap guarantee specific to ERAs for the 2025 Tax Season, the fee specific to ERAs for the 2025 Tax Season was increased with the fee applicable to in-season RAs for the 2025 Tax Season being reduced.
Total ERA/RA origination volume for the 2025 tax filing season totaled $802 million, representing a $72 million, or 8%, decline from $874 million originated for the 2024 tax filing season. RA origination volume totaled $663 million during the first nine months of 2025 compared to $771 million for the first nine months of 2024. Originations for both periods occurred during the first quarter. ERA origination volume totaled $139 million during the fourth quarter of 2024 related to the anticipated filing of tax returns for the upcoming first quarter 2025 tax filing season compared to $103 million during the fourth quarter of 2023 related to the anticipated filing of tax returns for the first quarter of 2024.
The lower Provision during the first nine months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 related to the following factors:
As of September 30, 2025, TRS’s incurred loss rate related to unguaranteed loans associated with the first quarter 2025 tax filing season was 2.66% of the $801 million total originations. In-line with its customary June 30th charge-off policy for TRS loans, the Company completely charged-off all remaining unpaid ERAa/RAs as of June 30, 2025 which equated to 2.81% of total originations.
As of September 30, 2024, TRS’s incurred loss rate related to unguaranteed loans associated with the first quarter 2024 tax filing season was 3.30% of the $874 million of total originations. In June 2024, the Company charged off all unpaid TRS loans which equated to 3.22% of total originations. The final loss rate of unguaranteed ERAs/RAs for the 2024 Tax Season was 2.81% of originations.
As illustrated in the following table, RCS recorded a net charge to the Provision of $11.9 million during the first nine months of 2025 compared to a net charge of $15.7 million for the same period in 2024. RCS recorded net charge-offs of $14.1 million during the first nine months of 2025 compared to $12.9 million during the first nine months of 2024. The remainder of the Provision fluctuation was generally in-line with average outstanding balances, with higher balances in the prior year leading to higher reserve build. RCS ending loan balances decreased by $16 million during the first nine months of 2025, primarily related to the healthcare receivables programs. During the first nine months of 2024, loan balances increased by a net $2 million.
While RCS loans generally return higher yields, they also present a greater credit risk than Traditional Banking loan products. As a percentage of total RCS loans, the RCS ACLL was 17.59% as of September 30, 2025, 16.30% as of December 31, 2024, and 15.70% as of September 30, 2024.
Table 10 — Republic Credit Solutions Provision by Product Type
11,955
15,746
(3,791)
(36)
800
(3,823)
Table 11 — Summary of Loan and Lease Loss Experience
(834)
(2,841)
105
Net loan charge-offs
(33,631)
(41,402)
Provision - Core Banking
Provision - RPG
Total Provision
Net loan charge-offs to average loans
0.84
1.04
93
Table 12 — Annualized Net Loan Charge-offs (Recoveries) to Average Loans by Loan Category
Owner occupied
Nonowner occupied
(0.02)
1.28
79.84
74.84
(0.43)
0.05
25.42
34.58
0.78
13.94
12.19
17.36
22.76
The Company’s net charge-offs to average total Company loans decreased from 1.04% during the first nine months of 2024 to 0.84% during the first nine months of 2025, with net charge-offs decreasing $7.8 million, or 19%, and average total Company loans increasing $39 million, or 1% over the same periods. As discussed in the previous section, the decrease in net charge-offs was primarily driven by a $6.4 million, or 24%, decrease in period-over-period net charge-offs within the Company’s TRS segment related to significantly better payments received from the U.S. Treasury to pay off ERAs/RAs during the 2025 tax season.
During the third quarter of 2024, the Traditional Bank recorded $1.9 million in charge-offs related to three linked, broker-related marine loans. The Company discontinued originating broker-related marine loans during the third quarter of 2024. During the first quarter of 2025, the Traditional Bank recorded a $1.6 million insurance recovery to noninterest income associated with these broker-related loans.
Total Company noninterest income increased $8.8 million, or 15%, during the first nine months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.
The following were the most significant components comprising the total Company’s noninterest income fluctuation by reportable segment:
Noninterest income increased $6.9 million, or 23%, for the first nine months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, primarily driven by the following:
TRS’s noninterest income increased $2.4 million, or 16%, during the first nine months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, with RT fees representing the majority of noninterest income for each period. Despite a 5.6% decrease in overall volume, RT income expanded $2.4 million, or 16%, in 2025 attributable to a 22.8% increase in the per-unit net fee earned. The better per-unit profitability was led primarily by select product price increases combined with a minimal change in revenue share.
For factors affecting the comparison of the TRS results of operations for the first nine months of 2025 and the first nine months of 2024, see section titled “OVERVIEW (Nine Months Ended September, 2025, Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024) - Tax Refund Solutions.”
Total Company noninterest expense increased $14.4 million, or 10%, during the first nine months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.
The following were the most significant components comprising the total Company’s noninterest expense fluctuation by reportable segment:
Traditional Bank noninterest expense increased $16.4 million, or 13%, for the first nine months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, driven primarily by the following:
Noninterest expense at the RCS segment decreased $1.8 million, or 17%, during the first nine months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, primarily driven by a $2.2 million, or 52%, reduction in marketing and development expenses, which generally fluctuate in-line with overall origination volume. Under the terms of the Company’s contract with its LOC II marketer-servicer, RCS reimburses the marketer-servicer a certain dollar amount for marketing costs based on each new line of credit originated during the period.
COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2025, AND DECEMBER 31, 2024
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash, deposits with other financial institutions with original maturities less than 90 days, and federal funds sold. The Company had $484 million in cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2025, compared to $432 million as of December 31, 2024. Average interest-earning cash and cash equivalent totaled $539 million for the first nine months of 2025, compared to $435 million for the first nine months of 2024. Despite the increase in ending and average interest-earning cash balances, over the past several months the Company has deployed a higher percentage of its excess cash into investment securities.
Beginning in 2020, the Company utilized a general investing strategy of purchasing securities with shorter-term durations and maintained a large amount of excess cash at the FRB. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2024 and continuing through first nine months of 2025, the Company purchased investment securities with longer durations, as a result of a more favorable yield curve and the more attractive yield above the overnight cash yield. The yield curve, which began to steepen during the fourth quarter of 2024, became positively sloped in late March 2025 and remained so through the end of September 2025.
For cash held at the FRB, the Bank earns a yield on amounts in excess of required reserves. This cash earned a weighted-average yield of 4.44% during the first nine months of 2025. For cash held within the Bank’s banking center and automated/integrated teller machine networks, the Bank does not earn interest.
Investment Securities
Table 13 — Purchases of Investment Securities
Purchase
Yield to
Estimated Weighted
Maturity
Average Life
Purchases by Class for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025
U.S. Government Agencies
4.86
yrs
79,584
5.20
5.53
134,584
5.12
5.26
Purchases by Class for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2025
35,000
4.71
3.00
149,198
5.11
3.62
184,198
5.04
3.50
Purchases by Class for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2025
119,979
3.98
197,394
4.62
3.88
317,373
4.52
3.92
Total Purchases for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025
636,155
4.80
Republic’s investment portfolio increased $254 million, or 43%, from December 31, 2024, to September 30, 2025. The increase was primarily driven by $636 million of securities purchases, partially offset by $184 million in calls and maturities of debt securities and paydowns on MBS’s.
Strategies for the investment securities portfolio are influenced by economic and market conditions, loan demand, deposit mix, and liquidity needs. The Company’s overall investment management strategy for the remainder of 2025 and beyond will be dependent upon many factors including, but not limited to, the Company’s overall current and projected liquidity positions, its customers’ demand for its loans and deposit products, the Company’s overall interest rate risk position, the steepness of the yield curve and the overall interest rate environment at the time, as well as the projected interest rate environment for the near-term and the long-term.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
FHLB stock holdings increased $1 million to $26 million at September 30, 2025 compared to $25 million at December 31, 2024. FHLB members are required to hold certain levels of FHLB stock in relation to the amount of advances, thus FHLB stock holdings will fluctuate consistently with borrowing activity from period to period.
Table 14 — Loan Portfolio Composition
12,278
(26,723)
(15,697)
(38,873)
8,009
1,944
28,541
3,301
(23,437)
46,250
(5,677)
(34)
(101)
(343)
(345)
(10,873)
(0)
59,066
48,193
(138,614)
(100)
(51,888)
(99)
(15,783)
(206,285)
(158,092)
12,113
(145,979)
**Total loans are presented inclusive of premiums, discounts and net loan origination fees and costs.
98
Total gross loans decreased by $158 million, or 3%, during the first nine months of 2025 to $5.28 billion as of September 30, 2025. The most significant components comprising the change in loans by reportable segment follow:
Traditional Banking period-end loan balances decreased $11 million from December 31, 2024, to September 30, 2025, as increased LOC usage within the HELOC and C&I portfolios was more than offset by contraction within the residential real estate, CRE and aircraft lending portfolios. During March 2025, the Company reached an agreement to sell approximately $5 million of consumer credit cards that were previously classified as held for investment. The sale of these credit cards was completed during the second quarter of 2025.
In addition, Management has continued to generally maintain a stricter pricing strategy across all lending types due to the at times less-favorable yield curve and elevated funding costs in the market. As expected, this stricter pricing strategy has continued to lead to slower overall origination volume across most product types.
Outstanding Warehouse period-end balances increased $59 million, or 11%, from December 31, 2024, to September 30, 2025. Average committed Warehouse lines of credit increased from $938 million for the year ended December 31, 2024, to $1.01 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, with higher demand driving average usage rates for Warehouse lines of credit from 50% to 53% for the respective periods.
Due to mortgage market volatility and seasonality, it is challenging to accurately project future outstanding balances of Warehouse lines of credit, however expansion within the portfolio has historically followed industry trends. Since entering the line of business in 2011, the Bank has experienced volatility in the Warehouse portfolio consistent with overall demand for mortgage products. Weighted-average quarterly usage rates on the Bank’s Warehouse lines of credit ranged from a low of 31% during the first quarter of 2023 to a high of 71% during the fourth quarter of 2019. On an annual basis, weighted-average usage rates on the Warehouse lines of credit have ranged from a low of 39% during 2022 to a high of 66% during 2020.
TRS loan balances as of December 31, 2024, included ERAs of $139 million originated during December 2024 and $52 million of commercial-related loans to Tax Providers to assist with their short-term cashflow needs. These balances paid down to $0 as of June 30, 2025, or were charged off in line with the Company’s charge-off policy.
The Bank maintains an ACLL for expected credit losses inherent in the Bank’s loan portfolio, which includes overdrawn deposit accounts. The Bank also maintains an ACLC for expected OBS credit exposure losses. Management evaluates the adequacy of the ACLL monthly, and the adequacy of the ACLC quarterly. All ACLs are presented and discussed with the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors quarterly.
The Company’s ACLL decreased to $80 million at September 30, 2025, compared to $92 million at December 31, 2024, with the total Company ACLL percent of total loans decreased to 1.51% as of September 30, 2025, compared to 1.69% as of December 31, 2024. An analysis of the ACLL by reportable segment follows:
While loan balances at the Traditional Bank decreased slightly, or $11 million, during the first nine months of 2025, the ACLL decreased $1 million to $58 million as of September 30, 2025. In the second quarter of 2025, as a practical expedient, the Company established a minimum loan balance threshold in assessing credits for impairment that resulted in a $518,000 credit adjustment to both the ACLL and Provision.
As a percentage of total Traditional Bank loans, the Traditional Banking ACLL was 1.28% as of September 30, 2025, compared to 1.31% as of December 31, 2024 and 1.30% as of September 30, 2024. The Company believes, based on information presently available, that it has adequately provided for Traditional Banking loan losses as of September 30, 2025.
The Warehouse ACLL increased $148,000, to $1.5 million, while the Warehouse ACLL to total Warehouse loans remained at 0.25% when comparing September 30, 2025 to December 31, 2024. Outstanding Warehouse period-end balances increased $59 million, or 11%, from December 31, 2024 to September 30, 2025. As of September 30, 2025, the Warehouse ACLL was entirely qualitative in nature with no adjustments to the qualitative reserve percentage required for the first nine months of 2025.
The TRS ACLL decreased $10 million from December 31, 2024, to $0 as of September 30, 2025, with this decrease primarily driven by the June 30, 2025, charge-off of all unpaid ERAs and Commercial-related loan balances to tax providers originated in December 2024.
The RCS ACLL decreased $1.1 million to $20 million as of September 30, 2025, driven primarily by the decrease in the LOC II and hospital receivable product spot loan balances.
RCS maintained an ACLL for two distinct credit products offered as of September 30, 2025, including its LOC products and its healthcare receivables products. As of September, 2025, the ACLL to total loans estimated for each RCS product ranged from as low as 0.25% for its healthcare receivables products to as high as 70.63% for its LOC products. The lower reserve percentage of 0.25% was provided for RCS’s healthcare receivables, as such receivables have recourse back to the third-party providers.
While RCS loans generally return higher yields, they also present a greater credit risk than Traditional Banking loan products. As a percentage of total RCS loans, the RCS ACLL was 17.59% as of September 30, 2025, 16.30% as of December 31, 2024, and 15.70% as of September 30, 2024. The segment continued to experience a change in loan mix, growing in categories with higher loan loss reserve requirements thus driving its higher ACLL for the quarter.
The following table sets forth management’s allocation of the ACLL by loan class. The ACLL allocation is based on management’s assessment of economic conditions, historical loss experience, forecasting for unemployment and vacancy rates, and various other life-of-loan and forecast considerations, as well as qualitative factors.
Table 15 — Management’s Allocation of the Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans
Percent of
Loans to
ACLL to
Loans*
Loan Class
Loan Class*
1.05
1.27
1.30
7,425
1.13
1.45
12,474
1.48
0.86
2,657
0.85
Total commercial real estate
3.35
3.37
0.51
0.55
1.20
0.25
2.08
2.09
8.96
8.38
72.08
73.73
0.95
2.55
2.96
1.31
1.19
7.06
0.34
0.13
17.59
16.30
17.54
9.65
1.69
* Values of less than 50 basis points are rounded down to zero.
Asset Quality
Classified and Special Mention Loans
The Bank applies credit quality indicators, or ratings, to individual loans based on internal Bank policies. Such internal policies are informed by regulatory standards. Loans rated “Loss,” “Doubtful,” “Substandard,” and PCD-Substandard are considered “Classified.” Classified loans increased by $20 million from December 31, 2024 to September 30, 2025, while Special Mention loans decreased approximately $30 million for the same period.
In the second quarter of 2025, the Company downgraded a $22 million hospitality relationship from Special Mention to Substandard based on the overall performance of the underlying operations. Based on the value of the collateral securing the relationship and current exit strategy, no future loss is currently expected. The Company does not have a material concentration of hospitality credits.
See the Footnote titled “Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements” for additional discussion regarding Classified and Special Mention loans.
Table 16 — Classified and Special Mention Loans
Loss
47,604
27,350
20,254
PCD - Substandard
853
1,378
(525)
Total Classified Loans
19,729
53,924
(29,717)
(55)
PCD - Special Mention
(359)
Total Special Mention Loans
(30,076)
Total Classified and Special Mention Loans
72,664
83,011
(10,347)
Nonperforming Loans
Nonperforming loans include loans on nonaccrual status and loans past due 90-days-or-more and still accruing. Nonperforming loans to total loans decreased to 0.41% as of September 30, 2025, from 0.42% as of December 31, 2024, as the total balance of nonperforming loans decreased by $1 million and total loans decreased $158 million.
The ACLL to total nonperforming loans decreased to 368% as of September 30, 2025, from 404% as of December 31, 2024, as the total ACLL decreased $12 million and the balance of nonperforming loans decreased by $1 million.
Table 17 — Nonperforming Loans and Nonperforming Assets Summary
404
Nonaccrual loans to total loans
Loans on nonaccrual status include collateral-dependent loans. See the Footnote titled“Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements” for additional discussion regarding collateral-dependent loans.
Table 18 — Nonperforming Loan Composition
1.68
0.03
0.10
0.19
0.71
0.67
5.83
0.47
0.50
0.11
Table 19 — Stratification of Nonperforming Loans
Number of Nonperforming Loans and Recorded Investment
> $100 &
No.
<= $100
<= $500
> $500
142
5,349
10,381
1,780
1,692
7,257
12,535
279
7,394
NM – Not meaningful. RCS loans are generally small dollar homogenous consumer loans.
140
5,119
10,247
1,965
207
678
1,288
613
188
6,788
12,842
3,045
22,675
12,983
271
22,816
Table 20 — Rollforward of Nonperforming Loans
Nonperforming loans at the beginning of the period
21,642
20,541
20,618
Loans added to nonperforming status during the period that remained nonperforming at the end of the period
2,930
6,693
5,565
Loans removed from nonperforming status during the period that were nonperforming at the beginning of the period (see table below)
(2,454)
(1,599)
(6,466)
(3,919)
Principal balance paydowns of loans nonperforming at both period ends
(437)
(1,071)
(1,214)
(1,549)
Net change in principal balance of other nonperforming loans*
(333)
(1,170)
Nonperforming loans at the end of the period
19,545
Includes RCS loans which are small dollar homogeneous consumer loans.
Table 21 — Detail of Loans Removed from Nonperforming Status
Loans charged-off
Loans transferred to OREO
(168)
Loan payoffs and paydowns
(4,555)
(155)
Loans returned to accrual status
(623)
(1,699)
(3,583)
Total loans removed from nonperforming status during the period that were nonperforming at the beginning of the period
Based on the Bank’s review as of September 30, 2025, management believes that its reserves are adequate to absorb expected losses on all nonperforming loans.
Total Company delinquent loans to total loans decreased to 0.37% as of September 30, 2025, from 0.38% as of December 31, 2024. Core Bank delinquent loans to total Core Bank loans increased slightly to 0.21% as of September 30, 2025, from 0.20% as of December 31, 2024. Except for small-dollar consumer loans, all Traditional Bank loans past due 90-days-or-more as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, were on nonaccrual status.
Table 22 — Delinquent Loan Composition*
0.73
0.01
0.18
0.20
0.22
0.17
13.17
17.62
7.69
7.67
3.22
Total delinquent loans
* Represents total loans 30-days-or-more past due. Delinquent status may be determined by either the number of days past due or number of payments past due.
Table 23 — Rollforward of Delinquent Loans
Delinquent loans at the beginning of the period
19,086
22,092
Loans added to delinquency status during the period and remained in delinquency status at the end of the period
5,265
4,678
7,146
5,606
Loans removed from delinquency status during the period that were in delinquency status at the beginning of the period (see table below)
(4,455)
(3,253)
(6,455)
(3,073)
Principal balance paydowns of loans delinquent at both period ends
(78)
(738)
(166)
(704)
Net change in principal balance of other delinquent loans*
(436)
980
(1,632)
(2,971)
Delinquent loans at the end of period
20,950
Table 24 — Detail of Loans Removed from Delinquent Status
(15)
(1,250)
(360)
(2,626)
(640)
Loans paid current
(2,993)
(2,893)
(3,617)
(2,250)
Total loans removed from delinquency status during the period that were in delinquency status at the beginning of the period
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment are presented on the consolidated balance sheets net of related accumulated depreciation on the respective assets, as well as fair value adjustments associated with purchase accounting. Premises and equipment increased $6 million, or 17%, between December 31, 2024, and September 30, 2025. The Company’s branch network currently consists of 47 locations throughout Kentucky, Indiana, Florida, Ohio, and Tennessee.
Right-of-Use Assets and Operating Lease Liabilities
The Company records right-of-use assets for the underlying leased property. Operating lease liabilities represent the present value of its required minimum lease payments plus any amounts probable of being owed under a residual value guarantee.
At September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, the Company had $41 million in goodwill recorded on its balance sheet. Goodwill of $24 million is attributed to the 2023 CBank acquisition. Additionally, goodwill totaling $6 million and $10 million is attributed to the acquisitions of Cornerstone Community Bank and GulfStream Community Bank in 2016 and 2006, respectively. The acquisitions of Tennessee Commerce Bank and First Commercial Bank in 2012 resulted in bargain purchase gains.
Events that may trigger goodwill impairment include deterioration in economic conditions, a decline in market-dependent multiples or metrics (i.e., stock price declining below tangible book value), negative trends in overall financial performance and regulatory actions. At September 30, 2025, the Company performed its annual qualitative assessment to determine if it was more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting units exceeded their carrying value, including goodwill. The qualitative assessment indicated that it was not more-likely-than-not that the carrying value of the reporting units exceeded their fair value.
BOLI assets increased $3 million, or 2%, to $110 million at September 30, 2025, compared to $107 million at December 31, 2024, the increase being attributed to general appreciation of the cash surrender values within the policy plans experienced during the first nine months of 2025.
Core Deposit Intangibles
CDIs arising from business acquisitions are initially measured at fair value and are then amortized on an accelerated method based on their useful lives. As of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, the Company’s CDI assets totaled $1.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively.
Other Assets and Other Liabilities
Other assets decreased $6 million, or 3%, to $192 million between December 31, 2024, and September 30, 2025. Other liabilities increased $46,000, to $109 million over the same period. The decline in other assets stems from the largely offsetting impact of recording additional tax credit investment assets.
Table 25 — Deposit Composition
(23,481)
218,622
(24,335)
49,961
486
24,647
48,910
(1,849)
0
293,059
46,564
339,623
(186,660)
(93)
(10,354)
495
(196,519)
1,198
(16,503)
(15,305)
(211,824)
(35)
Total deposits increased $128 million, or 2%, from December 31, 2024, to $5.34 billion as of September 30, 2025.
Total Core Bank deposits increased by $340 million, or 7%, from December 31, 2024 to September 30, 2025. Within the Core Bank’s deposits, interest-bearing deposits increased $293 million and noninterest-bearing deposits increased $47 million over the respective period.
Core Bank time deposits increased $74 million during the first nine months of 2025 ending at $404 million. In addition, consumer and money market accounts, which pay premium rates, increased $219 million, or 17% during the first nine months of 2025. The Core Bank continues to experience general migration from low and noninterest-bearing accounts to higher costing accounts.
While Core Bank period-end noninterest-bearing deposits increased $47 million for the first nine months of 2025, the average balances of Core Bank noninterest-bearing deposits for the first nine months of 2025 decreased $51 million, or 4%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. Overall, the Core Bank’s noninterest-bearing deposits have experienced a general quarterly decline in balances dating back to the fourth quarter of 2022.
Within RPG, period-end total deposit balances decreased $212 million, or 35%, during the first nine months of 2025, with $194 million of the decline associated with the maturity of short-term brokered deposits used to partially fund TRS ERA/RA loan volume for the 2025 Tax Season. Deposits related to the prepaid card program declined $25 million, or 7%, during the first nine months of 2025 due primarily to contraction in balances from the segment’s largest marketer-servicer.
As previously disclosed, RPS began sharing a sizable portion of the interest revenue it earns on its prepaid card balances with its prepaid card marketer-servicers during the first quarter of 2024. This revenue share is reported as interest expense on deposits. As a result, all prepaid card deposit balances subject to a revenue share arrangement will be reported as interest-bearing deposits on an on-going basis, as long as they remain subject to a revenue share arrangement. Conversely, for any periods reported prior to 2024, these deposits will remain noninterest-bearing as they were not subject to a revenue share arrangement during those periods.
SSUARs are collateralized by securities and are treated as financings; accordingly, the securities involved with the agreements are recorded as assets and are held by a safekeeping agent and the obligations to repurchase the securities are reflected as liabilities. All securities underlying the agreements are under the Bank’s control. SSUARs represent large customer relationships deposited into the Bank that require security collateral above the $250,000 FDIC insurance limit of the Bank.
SSUARs decreased $29 million, or 28%, during 2025 to $75 million as of September 30, 2025. Due to the size of the underlying relationships, large fluctuations in the underlying account balances from period to period are common.
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
FHLB advances totaled $375 million as of September 30, 2025, compared to $395 million as of December 31, 2024. There were no overnight borrowings as of September 30, 2025, compared to $25 million as of December 31, 2024. The Company has utilized FHLB advances over the past year to partially fund its noninterest-bearing deposit outflow and overall loan growth.
As of September 30, 2025, the Company’s outstanding FHLB advances had a weighted-average maturity of 1.78 years and a weighted-average cost of 4.33%, both including the impact of the related swaps. Overall use of FHLB advances during a given year is dependent upon many factors including asset growth, deposit growth, current earnings, and expectations of future interest rates, among others.
Interest Rate Swaps
The Bank enters into interest rate swaps to facilitate client transactions and meet their financing needs. Upon entering into these instruments, the Bank enters into offsetting positions to minimize the Bank’s interest rate risk. These swaps are derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments, and therefore changes in fair value are reported in current year’s earnings.
In addition, as noted in the section above, the Company entered into $100 million of notional amount balance sheet related interest rate swaps during the second quarter of 2024 in order to take advantage of the more attractive long-term pricing resulting from the then-inverted yield.
See the Footnote titled “Interest Rate Swaps” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements” for additional discussion regarding the Bank’s interest rate swaps.
Liquidity
The Bank maintains sufficient liquidity to fund routine loan demand and routine deposit withdrawal activity. Liquidity is managed by maintaining sufficient liquid assets, primarily in the form of cash, cash equivalents, and unencumbered investment securities. Funding and cash flows can also be realized through deposit product promotions, the sale of AFS debt securities, principal paydowns on loans and MBSs, and proceeds realized from loans HFS.
Table 26 — Liquid Assets and Borrowing Capacity
The Bank’s liquid assets and borrowing capacity included the following:
Unencumbered debt securities
708,020
432,183
Total liquid assets
1,192,258
864,334
Available borrowing capacity with the FHLB
743,085
755,288
Available borrowing capacity with the FRB
9,527
45,880
Available borrowing capacity through unsecured credit lines
Total available borrowing capacity
852,612
901,168
Total liquid assets and available borrowing capacity
2,044,870
1,765,502
Republic had a period-end loan-to-deposit ratio (excluding brokered deposits) of 101% as of September 30, 2025 and 111% as of December 31, 2024. Republic’s banking centers and its website, www.republicbank.com, provide access to retail deposit markets. These retail deposit products, if offered at attractive rates, have historically been a source of additional funding when needed. If the Bank were to lose a significant funding source, such as a few major depositors, or if any of its lines of credit were cancelled, or if the Bank cannot obtain brokered deposits, the Bank would be compelled to offer market leading deposit interest rates to meet its funding and liquidity needs.
As of September 30, 2025, the Bank had approximately $1.2 billion in deposits from 236 large non-sweep deposit relationships, including reciprocal deposits, where the individual relationship exceeded $2 million for a depositor’s taxpayer identification number. Total uninsured deposits for the Bank were $2.0 billion, or 38%, of total deposits as of September 30, 2025. The 20 largest non-sweep deposit relationships represented approximately $361 million, or 7%, of the Company’s total deposit balances as of September 30, 2025. These accounts do not require collateral; therefore, cash from these accounts can generally be utilized to fund the loan portfolio. If any of these balances were moved from the Bank, the Bank would likely utilize overnight borrowing lines in the short-term to replace the balances. On a longer-term basis, the Bank would likely utilize wholesale-brokered deposits to replace withdrawn balances, or alternatively, higher-cost internet-sourced deposits. Based on experience utilizing brokered deposits and internet-sourced deposits, the Bank believes it can quickly obtain these types of deposits if needed. The overall cost of gathering these types of deposits, however, could be substantially higher than the Traditional Bank deposits they replace, potentially decreasing the Bank’s earnings.
The Bank’s liquidity is impacted by its ability to sell certain investment securities, which is limited due to the level of investment securities that are needed to secure public deposits, SSUAR, FHLB advances, and for other purposes, as required by law. As of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, these pledged investment securities had a fair value of $99 million and $152 million.
Total stockholders’ equity increased from $992 million as of December 31, 2024, to $1.1 billion as of September 30, 2025. The increase in stockholders’ equity was attributable to net income earned during the first nine months of 2025 reduced primarily by cash dividends declared.
Common Stock — The Class A Common shares are entitled to cash dividends equal to 110% of the cash dividend paid per share on Class B Common Stock. Class A Common shares have one vote per share and Class B Common shares have ten votes per share. Class B Common shares may be converted, at the option of the holder, to Class A Common shares on a share for share basis. The Class A Common shares are not convertible into any other class of Republic’s capital stock.
Dividend Restrictions — The Parent Company’s principal source of funds for dividend payments are dividends received from RB&T. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid to the Parent Company by the Bank without prior approval of the respective states’ banking regulators. Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to the current year’s net profits, combined with the retained net profits of the preceding two years. As of October 1, 2025, RB&T could, without prior approval, declare dividends of approximately $168 million. Any payment of dividends in the future will depend, in large part, on the Company’s earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, and other factors considered relevant by the Company’s Board of Directors.
Regulatory Capital Requirements — The Parent Company and the Bank are subject to capital regulations in accordance with Basel III, as administered by banking regulators. Regulatory agencies measure capital adequacy within a framework that makes capital requirements, in part, dependent on the individual risk profiles of financial institutions. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on Republic’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Parent Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities, and certain OBS items, as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators regarding components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Banking regulators have categorized the Bank as well capitalized. For prompt corrective action, the regulations in accordance with Basel III define “well capitalized” as a 10.0% Total Risk-Based Capital ratio, a 6.5% Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital ratio, an 8.0% Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital ratio, and a 5.0% Tier 1 Leverage ratio. Additionally, to avoid limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, the Company and Bank must hold a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% composed of Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital above their minimum risk-based capital requirements.
Republic continues to exceed the regulatory requirements for Total Risk-Based Capital, Common Equity Tier I Risk-Based Capital, Tier I Risk Based-Capital, and Tier I Leverage Capital. Republic and the Bank intend to maintain a capital position that meets or exceeds the “well-capitalized” requirements as defined by the FRB and the FDIC, in addition to the Capital Conservation Buffer. Republic’s average stockholders’ equity to average assets ratio was 14.78% as of September 30, 2025, and 14.02% as of December 31, 2024. Formal measurements of the capital ratios for Republic and the Bank are performed by the Company at each quarter end.
Table 27 — Capital Ratios (1)
Ratio
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
1,124,914
18.21
1,042,149
16.98
1,064,434
17.25
989,800
16.14
Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
1,048,985
965,243
15.73
987,230
15.99
912,968
14.89
Tier 1 (core) capital to risk-weighted assets
Tier 1 leverage capital to average assets
14.94
14.07
14.20
13.29
Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk
Asset/liability management is designed to ensure safety and soundness, maintain liquidity, meet regulatory capital standards, and achieve acceptable net interest income based on the Bank’s risk tolerance. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income as a result of market fluctuations in interest rates. The Bank, on an ongoing basis, monitors interest rate and liquidity risk to implement appropriate funding and balance sheet strategies. Management considers interest rate risk to be a significant risk to the Bank’s overall earnings and balance sheet.
111
The interest sensitivity profile of the Bank at any point in time will be impacted by a number of factors. These factors include the mix of interest sensitive assets and liabilities, as well as their relative pricing schedules. It is also influenced by changes in market interest rates, deposit and loan balances, and other factors.
The Bank utilizes earnings simulation models as tools to measure interest rate sensitivity, including both a static and dynamic earnings simulation model. A static simulation model is based on current exposures and assumes a constant balance sheet. In contrast, a dynamic simulation model relies on detailed assumptions regarding changes in existing business lines, new business, and changes in management and customer behavior. While the Bank runs the static simulation model as one measure of interest rate risk, historically, the Bank has utilized its dynamic earnings simulation model as its primary interest rate risk tool to measure the potential changes in market interest rates and their subsequent effects on net interest income for a one-year time period. This dynamic model projects a “Base” case net interest income over the next 12 months and the effect on net interest income of instantaneous movements in interest rates between various basis point increments equally across all points on the yield curve. Many assumptions based on growth expectations and on the historical behavior of the Bank’s deposit and loan rates and their related balances in relation to changes in interest rates are incorporated into this dynamic model. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the dynamic model cannot precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to the actual timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, the actual timing and magnitude of changes in loan and deposit balances, as well as the actual changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various management strategies as compared to those projected in the various simulated models. Additionally, actual results could differ materially from the model if interest rates do not move equally across all points on the yield curve.
As of September 30, 2025, a dynamic simulation model was run for interest rate changes from “Down 400” basis points to “Up 400” basis points. The following table illustrates the Bank’s projected percent change from its Base net interest income over the period beginning October 1, 2025, and ending September 30, 2026, based on instantaneous movements in interest rates from Down 400 to Up 400 basis points equally across all points on the yield curve. The Bank’s dynamic earnings simulation model includes secondary market loan fees, which are a component of mortgage banking income within noninterest income and excludes Traditional Bank loan fees.
Table 28 — Bank Interest Rate Sensitivity
Change in Rates
-400
-300
-200
-100
+100
+200
+300
+400
Basis Points
% Change from base net interest income as of September 30, 2025
(1.1)
(1.8)
(4.6)
(2.3)
2.4
5.0
7.2
9.5
% Change from base net interest income as of December 31, 2024
3.4
4.4
(0.2)
0.2
1.5
3.1
6.0
The results of the interest rate sensitivity analysis performed as of September 30, 2025, were derived from subjective assumptions the Company uses in its earnings simulation model, particularly in relation to deposit betas, which measure how responsive management’s deposit repricing may be to changes in market rates based on historical data. Management uses different betas in the rising and falling rate scenarios to better simulate expected earnings trends.
The Company’s current interest rate sensitivity analysis projects that increases in market interest rates (in all illustrated scenarios) would have a positive effect on net interest income, while decreases in market interest rates (in all illustrated scenarios) would have a negative impact. These results depict an asset-sensitive interest rate risk profile.
In comparing the Company’s interest rate sensitivity projections from December 31, 2024, to September 30, 2025, there were notable changes in all illustrated scenarios. In declining market interest rate scenarios, the Company projects that the rates the Company pays for its non-maturity, interest-bearing deposits cannot be lowered sufficiently to offset the decrease in interest income associated with its declining asset yields. Conversely, the Company projects a notable improvement in all illustrated scenarios, as the yield the Company projects it will earn for its interest-earning assets is expected to increase more than the increase in its projected funding costs.
More specifically, driving the period-to-period improvement in net interest income in the illustrated up-rate scenarios are the following:
More specifically, driving the period-to-period deterioration in net interest income in the illustrated down-rate scenarios are the following:
For additional discussion regarding the Bank’s net interest income, see the sections titled “Net Interest Income” in this section of the filing under “RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Three Months Ended September 30, 2025 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2024) and “RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024).”
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Information required by this item is included under Part I, Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Item 4.Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by Republic Bancorp, Inc.’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. In addition, no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1.Legal Proceedings.
In the ordinary course of operations, Republic and the Bank are defendants in various legal proceedings. There is no proceeding, pending, or threatened litigation in which Republic and the Bank are a defendant, to the knowledge of management, in which an adverse decision could result in a material adverse change in the business or consolidated financial position of Republic or the Bank.
Item 1A.Risk Factors.
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
Except for the additional risk factor information described below, there have been no material changes in the Company’s risk factors as previously disclosed in Part 1, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. You should carefully consider the risk factors discussed below and in Republic’s 2024 Form 10-K, which could materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations in the future.
The Company plans to convert its core customer operating system during the fourth quarter of 2025 and could encounter significant adverse developments. The Company plans to replace its core customer operating system (the “Core System”). The Core System, among many other functions, is used to track customer relationships, deposit accounts, and loan accounts. The Core System is integrated with many other customer-facing applications and ancillary back-office systems that are used to service customers. Changing the Core System will subject the Company to operational risks during and after the conversion, which may adversely impact the Company’s customers, including, but not limited to, possible disruptions to technology systems, loss of data, improperly posted transactions and the inability to correct transaction errors. While the Company has plans and procedures designed to prevent or limit the risks of a failure during and after the conversion of our Core System, there can be no assurance that any such adverse development(s) will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be timely and adequately remediated. The ultimate impact of any adverse development could result in the write-off
of unidentified outages, damage the Company's reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject the Company to regulatory scrutiny, and expose it to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Details of Republic’s Class A Common Stock purchases during the third quarter of 2025 are included in the following table:
Total Number of
Maximum Number
Shares Purchased
of Shares that May
as Part of Publicly
Yet Be Purchased
Average Price
Announced Plans
Under the Plan
Paid Per Share
or Programs
July 1 - July 31
433,395
August 1 - August 31
September 1 - September 30
The Company did not repurchase any of its shares during the third quarter of 2025. In addition, in connection with employee stock awards, there were 473 shares withheld upon exercise of stock options to satisfy the withholding taxes. On January 24, 2024, the Board of Directors of Republic Bancorp, Inc. increased the Company’s existing authorization to purchase shares of its Class A Common Stock by 400,000 shares. The repurchase program will remain effective until the total number of shares authorized is repurchased or until Republic’s Board of Directors terminates the program. As of September 30, 2025 the Company had 433,395 shares which could be repurchased under its current share repurchase programs.
During the third quarter of 2025, there were no shares of Class A Common Stock issued upon conversion of shares of Class B Common Stock by stockholders of Republic in accordance with the share-for-share conversion option of the Class B Common Stock. The exemption from registration of newly issued Class A Common Stock relies upon Section (3)(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933.
There were no equity securities of the registrant sold without registration during the quarter covered by this report.
Item 5.Other Information.
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans
During the three months ended September 30, 2025, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act) adopted or terminated any contract, instruction or written plan for the purchase or sale of our securities that was intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act or any “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” as defined in Item 408(c) of Regulation S-K.
Item 6.Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed or furnished as a part of this report:
Exhibit Number
Description of Exhibit
31.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32*
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The following financial statements from the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q were formatted in iXBRL(Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Three and Nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Cover Page Interactive Data File formatted in iXBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.
This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant)
Principal Executive Officer:
Date: November 6, 2025
/s/ Steven E. Trager
By: Steven E. Trager
Executive Chair and Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer:
/s/ Kevin Sipes
By: Kevin Sipes
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Accounting Officer