Renasant Corp - 10-Q quarterly report FY

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

________________________________________________________

FORM 10-Q

________________________________________________________

(Mark One)



ý	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014



o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-13253

________________________________________________________

RENASANT CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

________________________________________________________



Mississippi		64-0676974
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

209 Troy Street, Tupelo, Mississippi		38804-4827
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(662) 680-1001

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

________________________________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	ý

Non-accelerated filer	o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

As of April 30, 2014, 31,484,327 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $5.00 par value per share, were outstanding. The registrant has no other classes of securities outstanding.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Form 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2014

CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In Thousands, Except Share Data)



	(Unaudited)
	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	82,991		$	87,342
Interest-bearing balances with banks	218,624			159,306
Cash and cash equivalents	301,615			246,648
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $484,780 and $408,576 respectively)	482,410			412,075
Securities available for sale, at fair value	564,278			501,254
Mortgage loans held for sale, at fair value	28,433			33,440
Loans, net of unearned income:
Covered under loss-share agreements	173,545			181,674
Not covered under loss-share agreements	3,693,883			3,699,344
Total loans, net of unearned income	3,867,428			3,881,018
Allowance for loan losses	(48,048		)	(47,665		)
Loans, net	3,819,380			3,833,353
Premises and equipment, net	102,184			101,525
Other real estate owned:
Covered under loss-share agreements	10,218			12,942
Not covered under loss-share agreements	37,523			39,945
Total other real estate owned, net	47,741			52,887
Goodwill	276,144			276,100
Other intangible assets, net	26,759			28,230
FDIC loss-share indemnification asset	24,963			26,273
Other assets	228,924			234,485
Total assets	$	5,902,831		$	5,746,270
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing	$	914,964		$	856,020
Interest-bearing	4,089,820			3,985,892
Total deposits	5,004,784			4,841,912
Short-term borrowings	—			2,283
Long-term debt	168,700			169,592
Other liabilities	52,632			66,831
Total liabilities	5,226,116			5,080,618
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock, $.01 par value – 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding	—			—
Common stock, $5.00 par value – 75,000,000 shares authorized, 32,656,166 and 32,656,182 shares issued, respectfully; 31,480,395 and 31,387,668 shares outstanding, respectively	163,281			163,281
Treasury stock, at cost	(22,109		)	(23,023		)
Additional paid-in capital	342,113			342,552
Retained earnings	203,037			194,815
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes	(9,607		)	(11,973		)
Total shareholders’ equity	676,715			665,652
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	5,902,831		$	5,746,270

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

(In Thousands, Except Share Data)



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2014		2013
Interest income
Loans	$	49,546	$	34,158
Securities
Taxable	4,243		2,791
Tax-exempt	2,189		1,947
Other	199		49
Total interest income	56,177		38,945
Interest expense
Deposits	4,373		4,080
Borrowings	1,833		1,484
Total interest expense	6,206		5,564
Net interest income	49,971		33,381
Provision for loan losses	1,450		3,050
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	48,521		30,331
Noninterest income
Service charges on deposit accounts	5,916		4,500
Fees and commissions	4,972		4,831
Insurance commissions	1,863		818
Wealth management revenue	2,144		1,724
Gains on sales of securities	—		54
BOLI income	731		730
Gains on sales of mortgage loans held for sale	1,585		3,565
Other	1,405		1,113
Total noninterest income	18,616		17,335
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits	28,428		21,274
Data processing	2,695		2,043
Net occupancy and equipment	4,847		3,604
Other real estate owned	1,701		2,049
Professional fees	1,200		1,173
Advertising and public relations	1,528		1,490
Intangible amortization	1,471		323
Communications	1,682		1,127
Merger-related expenses	195		—
Other	3,898		4,474
Total noninterest expense	47,645		37,557
Income before income taxes	19,492		10,109
Income taxes	5,895		2,538
Net income	$	13,597	$	7,571
Basic earnings per share	$	0.43	$	0.30
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.43	$	0.30
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.17	$	0.17

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

(In Thousands, Except Share Data)



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2014			2013
Net income	$	13,597		$	7,571
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Securities:
Unrealized holding gains on securities	2,784			146
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) realized in net income	—			71
Amortization of unrealized holding gains on securities transferred to the held to maturity category	(44		)	(66		)
Total securities	2,740			151
Derivative instruments:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on derivative instruments	(419		)	207
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income	—			(53		)
Totals derivative instruments	(419		)	154
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans:
Net (loss) gain arising during the period	—			—
Less amortization of net actuarial loss recognized in net periodic pension cost	45			72
Total defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans	45			72
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	2,366			377
Comprehensive income	$	15,963		$	7,948

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(In Thousands)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014			2013
Operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	20,260		$	41,340
Investing activities
Purchases of securities available for sale	(76,282		)	(70,720		)
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale	—			9,013
Proceeds from call/maturities of securities available for sale	17,069			21,425
Purchases of securities held to maturity	(128,684		)	(59,987		)
Proceeds from sales of securities held to maturity	—			4,461
Proceeds from call/maturities of securities held to maturity	57,890			28,590
Net decrease/(increase) in loans	12,038			(3,608		)
Purchases of premises and equipment	(2,293		)	(2,337		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(120,262		)	(73,163		)
Financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in noninterest-bearing deposits	58,944			(1,149		)
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits	103,928			95,103
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings	(2,283		)	1,594
Repayment of long-term debt	(989		)	(2,197		)
Cash paid for dividends	(5,372		)	(4,300		)
Cash received on exercise of stock-based compensation	—			225
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation	741			155
Net cash provided by financing activities	154,969			89,431
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	54,967			57,608
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	246,648			132,420
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	301,615		$	190,028
Supplemental disclosures
Cash paid for interest	$	6,543		$	5,779
Cash paid for income taxes	$	4,993		$	2,645
Noncash transactions:
Transfers of loans to other real estate owned	$	2,585		$	5,828

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations: Renasant Corporation (referred to herein as the “Company”) owns and operates Renasant Bank (“Renasant Bank” or the “Bank”) and Renasant Insurance, Inc. The Company offers a diversified range of financial, fiduciary and insurance services to its retail and commercial customers through its subsidiaries and full service offices located throughout north and north central Mississippi, Tennessee, north and central Alabama and north Georgia.

Basis of Presentation: The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. For further information regarding the Company’s significant accounting policies, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 11, 2014.

On September 1, 2013, the Company completed its acquisition of First M&F Corporation (“First M&F”). The financial condition and results of operation for First M&F are included in the Company’s financial statements since the date of the acquisition. See Note M, “Mergers and Acquisitions,” in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding the terms and conditions of the Company’s merger with First M&F.

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Subsequent Events: The Company has evaluated, for consideration of recognition or disclosure, subsequent events that have occurred through the date of issuance of its financial statements, and has determined that no significant events occurred after March 31, 2014 but prior to the issuance of these financial statements that would have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note B – Securities

(In Thousands)

The amortized cost and fair value of securities held to maturity were as follows as of the dates presented:



	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
March 31, 2014
Obligations of other U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	185,056	$	10	$	(6,764	)	$	178,302
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	297,354		10,594		(1,470		)	306,478
	$	482,410	$	10,604	$	(8,234	)	$	484,780
December 31, 2013
Obligations of other U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	125,061	$	14	$	(8,727	)	$	116,348
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	287,014		7,897		(2,683		)	292,228
	$	412,075	$	7,911	$	(11,410	)	$	408,576

In light of the ongoing fiscal uncertainty in state and local governments, the Company analyzes its exposure to potential losses in its security portfolio on at least a quarterly basis. Management reviews the underlying credit rating and analyzes the financial condition of the respective issuers. The Company had no sales of such securities in the first quarter ending 2014. However, the

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Company sold certain securities representing obligations of state and political subdivisions that were classified as held to maturity during the same

period in 2013. The securities sold showed significant credit deterioration because our analysis led us to conclude that the issuers were operating at net deficits with little to no financial cushion to offset future contingencies. The securities sold during the first quarter of 2013 had a carrying value of $4,292, and the Company recognized a net gain of $169 on the sale.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale were as follows as of the dates presented:



	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
March 31, 2014
Obligations of other U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	6,138	$	136	$	(159	)	$	6,115
Residential mortgage backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	303,024		3,254		(3,296		)	302,982
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	168,484		1,464		(4,028		)	165,920
Commercial mortgage backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	41,063		1,402		(406		)	42,059
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	4,184		72		—			4,256
Trust preferred securities	27,514		290		(8,426		)	19,378
Other debt securities	18,918		357		(177		)	19,098
Other equity securities	2,775		1,695		—			4,470
	$	572,100	$	8,670	$	(16,492	)	$	564,278



	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
December 31, 2013
Obligations of other U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	6,144	$	125	$	(201	)	$	6,068
Residential mortgage backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	261,659		2,747		(4,414		)	259,992
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	149,682		1,542		(4,679		)	146,545
Commercial mortgage backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	41,252		1,373		(584		)	42,041
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	5,007		59		—			5,066
Trust preferred securities	27,531		73		(9,933		)	17,671
Other debt securities	19,544		240		(230		)	19,554
Other equity securities	2,775		1,542		—			4,317
	$	513,594	$	7,701	$	(20,041	)	$	501,254

Gross realized gains and gross realized losses on sales of securities available for sale for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2014		2013
Gross gains on sales of securities available for sale	$	—	$	—
Gross losses on sales of securities available for sale	—		(115		)
Loss on sales of securities available for sale, net	$	—	$	(115	)

At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, securities with a carrying value of $748,738 and $604,571, respectively, were pledged to secure government, public and trust deposits. Securities with a carrying value of $4,991 and $7,626 were pledged as collateral for short-term borrowings and derivative instruments at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities at March 31, 2014 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.



	Held to Maturity				Available for Sale
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due within one year	$	69,290	$	69,391	$	—	$	—
Due after one year through five years	54,751		56,469		1,075		1,146
Due after five years through ten years	208,703		204,699		5,063		4,969
Due after ten years	149,666		154,221		27,514		19,378
Residential mortgage backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	—		—		303,024		302,982
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	—		—		168,484		165,920
Commercial mortgage backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	—		—		41,063		42,059
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	—		—		4,184		4,256
Other debt securities	—		—		18,918		19,098
Other equity securities	—		—		2,775		4,470
	$	482,410	$	484,780	$	572,100	$	564,278

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table presents the age of gross unrealized losses and fair value by investment category as of the dates presented:



	Less than 12 Months						12 Months or More						Total
	#	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			#	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			#	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Held to Maturity:
March 31, 2014
Obligations of other U.S. Government agencies and corporations	26	$	126,526	$	(6,053	)	2	$	9,279	$	(711	)	28	$	135,805	$	(6,764	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	70	45,661		(1,205		)	6	4,087		(265		)	76	49,748		(1,470		)
Total	96	$	172,187	$	(7,258	)	8	$	13,366	$	(976	)	104	185,553		$	(8,234	)
December 31, 2013
Obligations of other U.S. Government agencies and corporations	26	$	105,747	$	(7,826	)	2	$	9,090	$	(901	)	28	$	114,837	$	(8,727	)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	111	59,503		(2,578		)	2	933		(105		)	113	60,436		(2,683		)
Total	137	$	165,250	$	(10,404	)	4	$	10,023	$	(1,006	)	141	$	175,273	$	(11,410	)
Available for Sale:
March 31, 2014
Obligations of other U.S. Government agencies and corporations	0	$	3,841	$	(159	)	0	$	—	$	—		0	$	3,841	$	(159	)
Residential mortgage backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	33	148,117		(2,197		)	5	18,501		(1,100		)	38	166,618		(3,297		)
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	17	73,776		(2,025		)	8	32,315		(2,003		)	25	106,091		(4,028		)
Commercial mortgage backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	3	10,487		(406		)	0	—		—			3	10,487		(406		)
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	0	—		—			0	—		—			0	—		—
Trust preferred securities	0	—		—			4	17,964		(8,426		)	4	17,964		(8,426		)
Other debt securities	1	2,713		(170		)	1	1,817		(7		)	2	4,530		(177		)
Total	54	$	238,934	$	(4,957	)	18	$	70,597	$	(11,536	)	72	$	309,531	$	(16,493	)
December 31, 2013
Obligations of other U.S. Government agencies and corporations	1	$	3,799	$	(201	)	0	$	—	$	—		1	$	3,799	$	(201	)
Residential mortgage backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	32	134,858		(3,451		)	3	13,239		(963		)	35	148,097		(4,414		)
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	17	68,496		(3,468		)	4	16,750		(1,211		)	21	85,246		(4,679		)
Commercial mortgage backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	4	16,570		(584		)	0	—		—			4	16,570		(584		)
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	0	—		—			0	—		—			0	—		—
Trust preferred securities	0	—		—			3	16,456		(9,933		)	3	16,456		(9,933		)
Other debt securities	3	7,100		(217		)	1	1,897		(13		)	4	8,997		(230		)
Other equity securities	0	—		—			0	—		—			0	—		—
Total	57	$	230,823	$	(7,921	)	11	$	48,342	$	(12,120	)	68	$	279,165	$	(20,041	)

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The Company evaluates its investment portfolio for other-than-temporary-impairment (“OTTI”) on a quarterly basis. Impairment is assessed at the individual security level. The Company considers an investment security impaired if the fair value of the security is less than its cost or amortized cost basis. Impairment is considered to be other-than-temporary if the Company intends to sell the investment security or if the Company does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security before the Company is required to sell the security or before the security’s maturity.

The Company holds investments in pooled trust preferred securities that had an amortized cost basis of $27,514 and $27,531 and a fair value of $19,378 and $17,671, at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The investments in pooled trust preferred securities consist of four securities representing interests in various tranches of trusts collateralized by debt issued by over 340 financial institutions. Management’s determination of the fair value of each of its holdings in pooled trust preferred securities is based on the current credit ratings, the known deferrals and defaults by the underlying issuing financial institutions and the degree to which future deferrals and defaults would be required to occur before the cash flow for the Company’s tranches is negatively impacted. In addition, management continually monitors key credit quality and capital ratios of the issuing institutions. This determination is further supported by quarterly valuations, which are performed by third parties, of each security obtained by the Company. The Company does not intend to sell the investments, and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of the investments’ amortized cost, which may be maturity. At March 31, 2014, management did not, and does not currently, believe such securities will be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment, but the Company previously concluded that it was probable that there had been an adverse change in estimated cash flows for all four trust preferred securities and recognized credit related impairment losses on these securities in 2010 and 2011. No additional impairment was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2014 or 2013.

However, based on the qualitative factors discussed above, each of the four pooled trust preferred securities was classified as a nonaccruing asset at March 31, 2014. Investment interest is recorded on the cash-basis method until qualifying for return to accrual status.

The following table provides information regarding the Company’s investments in pooled trust preferred securities at March 31, 2014:



Name	Single/ Pooled	Class/ Tranche	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Lowest Credit Rating	Issuers Currently in Deferral or Default
XIII	Pooled	B-2	$	1,125	$	1,415	$	290		Caa3	28	%
XXIII	Pooled	B-2	8,746		5,495		(3,251		)	B1	20	%
XXIV	Pooled	B-2	12,076		8,175		(3,901		)	Ca	34	%
XXVI	Pooled	B-2	5,567		4,293		(1,274		)	Ca	30	%
			$	27,514	$	19,378	$	(8,136	)

The following table provides a summary of the cumulative credit related losses recognized in earnings for which a portion of OTTI has been recognized in other comprehensive income:



	2014			2013
Balance at January 1	$	(3,337	)	$	(3,337	)
Additions related to credit losses for which OTTI was not previously recognized	—			—
Increases in credit loss for which OTTI was previously recognized	—			—
Balance at March 31	$	(3,337	)	$	(3,337	)

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note C – Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses

(In Thousands, Except Number of Loans)

The following is a summary of loans as of the dates presented:



	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	440,116		$	468,963
Lease financing	623			53
Real estate – construction	155,900			161,436
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	1,211,260			1,208,233
Real estate – commercial mortgage	1,968,158			1,950,572
Installment loans to individuals	91,382			91,762
Gross loans	3,867,439			3,881,019
Unearned income	(11		)	(1		)
Loans, net of unearned income	3,867,428			3,881,018
Allowance for loan losses	(48,048		)	(47,665		)
Net loans	$	3,819,380		$	3,833,353

Past Due and Nonaccrual Loans

Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Generally, the recognition of interest on mortgage and commercial loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days past due unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection. Consumer and other retail loans are typically charged-off no later than the time the loan is 120 days past due. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. Loans may be placed on nonaccrual regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. All interest accrued for the current year, but not collected, for loans that are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table provides an aging of past due and nonaccrual loans, segregated by class, as of the dates presented:



	Accruing Loans										Nonaccruing Loans
	30-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Current Loans			Total Loans			30-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Current Loans		Total Loans		Total Loans
March 31, 2014
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	1,565	$	354	$	435,597		$	437,516		$	36	$	1,207	$	1,357	$	2,600	$	440,116
Lease financing	—		—		623			623			—		—		—		—		623
Real estate – construction	265		—		153,987			154,252			—		1,648		—		1,648		155,900
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	11,884		1,727		1,182,749			1,196,360			550		7,722		6,628		14,900		1,211,260
Real estate – commercial mortgage	7,712		1,041		1,907,796			1,916,549			2,939		37,035		11,635		51,609		1,968,158
Installment loans to individuals	366		154		90,783			91,303			—		71		8		79		91,382
Unearned income	—		—		(11		)	(11		)	—		—		—		—		(11		)
Total	$	21,792	$	3,276	$	3,771,524		$	3,796,592		$	3,525	$	47,683	$	19,628	$	70,836	$	3,867,428
December 31, 2013
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	2,067	$	607	$	463,521		$	466,195		$	138	$	1,959	$	671	$	2,768	$	468,963
Lease financing	—		—		53			53			—		—		—		—		53
Real estate – construction	664		—		159,124			159,788			—		1,648		—		1,648		161,436
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	10,168		2,206		1,179,703			1,192,077			1,203		6,041		8,912		16,156		1,208,233
Real estate – commercial mortgage	8,870		1,286		1,888,745			1,898,901			966		37,439		13,266		51,671		1,950,572
Installment loans to individuals	706		88		90,880			91,674			—		80		8		88		91,762
Unearned income	—		—		(1		)	(1		)	—		—		—		—		(1		)
Total	$	22,475	$	4,187	$	3,782,025		$	3,808,687		$	2,307	$	47,167	$	22,857	$	72,331	$	3,881,018

There were no restructured loans contractually 90 days past due or more at March 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013. The outstanding balance of restructured loans on nonaccrual status was $9,696 and $10,078 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Impaired Loans

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial, consumer and construction loans above a minimum dollar amount threshold by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are evaluated collectively for impairment. When the ultimate collectability of an impaired loan’s principal is in doubt, wholly or partially, all cash receipts are applied to principal. Once the recorded balance has been reduced to zero, future cash receipts are applied to interest income, to the extent any interest has been foregone, and then they are recorded as recoveries of any amounts previously charged-off. For impaired loans, a specific reserve is established to adjust the carrying value of the loan to its estimated net realizable value.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Impaired loans recognized in conformity with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic ("ASC") 310, “Receivables” (“ASC 310”), segregated by class, were as follows as of the dates presented:



	Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Recorded Investment With Allowance		Recorded Investment With No Allowance		Total Recorded Investment		Related Allowance
March 31, 2014
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	9,534	$	723	$	4,761	$	5,484	$	253
Lease financing	—		—		—		—		—
Real estate – construction	2,834		—		1,882		1,882		—
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	32,727		21,831		4,481		26,312		7,285
Real estate – commercial mortgage	123,870		32,529		46,960		79,489		7,724
Installment loans to individuals	—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	168,965	$	55,083	$	58,084	$	113,167	$	15,262
December 31, 2013
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	6,575	$	743	$	2,043	$	2,786	$	260
Lease financing	—		—		—		—		—
Real estate – construction	2,447		—		1,648		1,648		—
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	42,868		25,374		8,542		33,916		7,353
Real estate – commercial mortgage	108,963		30,624		38,517		69,141		7,036
Installment loans to individuals	620		183		77		260		1
Totals	$	161,473	$	56,924	$	50,827	$	107,751	$	14,650

The following table presents the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the periods presented:



	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2014				March 31, 2013
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized⁽¹⁾
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	7,745	$	5	$	3,758	$	—
Lease financing	—		—		—		—
Real estate – construction	2,037		2		1,650		—
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	27,754		34		43,097		183
Real estate – commercial mortgage	91,277		64		79,940		343
Installment loans to individuals	—		—		—		—
Total	$	128,813	$	105	$	128,445	$	526


(1)	Includes interest income recognized using the cash-basis method of income recognition of $0. The Company recognized $289 interest income using the cash-basis method of income recognition during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Restructured Loans

Restructured loans are those for which concessions have been granted to the borrower due to a deterioration of the borrower’s financial condition and which are performing in accordance with the new terms. Such concessions may include reduction in interest rates or deferral of interest or principal payments. In evaluating whether to restructure a loan, management analyzes the long-term financial condition of the borrower, including guarantor and collateral support, to determine whether the proposed concessions will increase the likelihood of repayment of principal and interest. Restructured loans that are not performing in accordance with

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

their restructured terms that are either contractually 90 days past due or placed on nonaccrual status are reported as nonperforming loans. The following table presents restructured loans segregated by class as of the dates presented:



	Number of Loans	Pre- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
March 31, 2014
Commercial, financial, agricultural	—	$	—	$	—
Lease financing	—	—		—
Real estate – construction	—	—		—
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	22	19,042		9,061
Real estate – commercial mortgage	16	12,785		10,741
Installment loans to individuals	—	—		—
Total	38	$	31,827	$	19,802
December 31, 2013
Commercial, financial, agricultural	1	$	20	$	19
Lease financing	—	—		—
Real estate – construction	—	—		—
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	23	19,371		10,354
Real estate – commercial mortgage	16	12,785		10,934
Installment loans to individuals	1	182		171
Total	41	$	32,358	$	21,478

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Changes in the Company’s restructured loans are set forth in the table below:



	Number of Loans		Recorded Investment
Totals at January 1, 2014	41		$	21,478
Additional loans with concessions	—		—
Reductions due to:
Reclassified as nonperforming	(1	)	(331		)
Paid in full	(2	)	(190		)
Charge-offs	—		—
Transfer to other real estate owned	—		—
Principal paydowns			(1,155		)
Lapse of concession period	—		—
Totals at March 31, 2014	38		$	19,802

The allocated allowance for loan losses attributable to restructured loans was $3,137 and $2,984 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The Company had $0 and $93 in remaining availability under commitments to lend additional funds on these restructured loans at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Credit Quality

For loans originated for commercial purposes, internal risk-rating grades are assigned by lending, credit administration or loan review personnel, based on an analysis of the financial and collateral strength and other credit attributes underlying each loan. Management analyzes the resulting ratings, as well as other external statistics and factors such as delinquency, to track the migration performance of the portfolio balances of these loans. Loan grades range between 1 and 9, with 1 being loans with the least credit risk. Loans that migrate toward the “Pass” grade (those with a risk rating between 1 and 4) or within the “Pass” grade generally have a lower risk of loss and therefore a lower risk factor. The “Watch” grade (those with a risk rating of 5) is utilized on a temporary basis for “Pass” grade loans where a significant adverse risk-modifying action is anticipated in the near term. Loans that migrate toward the “Substandard” grade (those with a risk rating between 6 and 9) generally have a higher risk of loss and therefore a higher risk factor applied to those related loan balances. The following table presents the Company’s loan portfolio by risk-rating grades as of the dates presented:



	Pass		Watch		Substandard		Total
March 31, 2014
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	318,388	$	7,083	$	3,011	$	328,482
Real estate – construction	109,808		840		—		110,648
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	130,472		11,822		21,875		164,169
Real estate – commercial mortgage	1,368,897		31,823		35,142		1,435,862
Installment loans to individuals	1,691		—		—		1,691
Total	$	1,929,256	$	51,568	$	60,028	$	2,040,852
December 31, 2013
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	328,959	$	10,588	$	4,266	$	343,813
Real estate – construction	114,428		588		—		115,016
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	126,916		13,864		23,370		164,150
Real estate – commercial mortgage	1,338,340		32,892		35,121		1,406,353
Installment loans to individuals	19		—		—		19
Total	$	1,908,662	$	57,932	$	62,757	$	2,029,351

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

For portfolio balances of consumer, consumer mortgage and certain other loans originated for other than commercial purposes, allowance factors are determined based on historical loss ratios by portfolio for the preceding eight quarters and may be adjusted by other qualitative criteria. The following table presents the performing status of the Company’s loan portfolio not subject to risk rating as of the dates presented:



	Performing		Non- Performing		Total
March 31, 2014
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	80,738	$	50	$	80,788
Lease financing	623		—		623
Real estate – construction	42,480		—		42,480
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	946,404		2,358		948,762
Real estate – commercial mortgage	244,863		177		245,040
Installment loans to individuals	83,382		143		83,525
Total	$	1,398,490	$	2,728	$	1,401,218
December 31, 2013
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	89,490	$	176	$	89,666
Lease financing	53		—		53
Real estate – construction	43,535		—		43,535
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	938,994		2,527		941,521
Real estate – commercial mortgage	242,363		666		243,029
Installment loans to individuals	84,855		79		84,934
Total	$	1,399,290	$	3,448	$	1,402,738

Loans Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality

Loans acquired in business combinations that exhibited, at the date of acquisition, evidence of deterioration of the credit quality since origination, such that it was probable that all contractually required payments would not be collected, were as follows as of the dates presented:



	Impaired Covered Loans		Other Covered Loans		Not Covered Loans		Total
March 31, 2014
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	—	$	8,283	$	22,563	$	30,846
Lease financing	—		—		—		—
Real estate – construction	—		1,648		1,124		2,772
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	835		51,417		46,077		98,329
Real estate – commercial mortgage	23,164		88,173		175,919		287,256
Installment loans to individuals	—		25		6,141		6,166
Total	$	23,999	$	149,546	$	251,824	$	425,369
December 31, 2013
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	—	$	9,546	$	25,938	$	35,484
Lease financing	—		—		—		—
Real estate – construction	—		1,648		1,237		2,885
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	835		53,631		48,096		102,562
Real estate – commercial mortgage	23,684		92,302		185,204		301,190
Installment loans to individuals	—		28		6,781		6,809
Total	$	24,519	$	157,155	$	267,256	$	448,930

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The references in the table above and elsewhere in these Notes to "covered loans" and "not covered loans" (as well as to "covered OREO" and "not covered OREO") refer to loans (or OREO, as applicable) covered and not covered, respectively, by loss-share agreements with the FDIC. See Note E, "FDIC Loss-Share Indemnification Asset," below for more information.

The following table presents the fair value of loans determined to be impaired at the time of acquisition and determined not to be impaired at the time of acquisition at March 31, 2014:



	Impaired Covered Loans			Other Covered Loans			Not Covered Loans			Total
Contractually-required principal and interest	$	66,318		$	191,885		$	337,443		$	595,646
Nonaccretable difference⁽¹⁾	(42,318		)	(39,131		)	(50,645		)	(132,094		)
Cash flows expected to be collected	24,000			152,754			286,798			463,552
Accretable yield⁽²⁾	(1		)	(3,208		)	(34,974		)	(38,183		)
Fair value	$	23,999		$	149,546		$	251,824		$	425,369


(1)	Represents contractual principal and interest cash flows of $582,714 and $12,932, respectively, not expected to be collected.


(2)	Represents contractual interest payments of $3,352 expected to be collected and purchase discount of $34,888.

Changes in the accretable yield of loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality were as follows:



	Impaired Covered Loans			Other Covered Loans			Not Covered Loans			Total
Balance at January 1, 2014	$	(13	)	$	(6,705	)	$	(1,129	)	$	(7,847	)
Reclasses from nonaccretable difference	(17		)	1,419			(37,489		)	(36,087		)
Accretion	29			2,078			3,587			5,694
Balance at March 31, 2014	$	(1	)	$	(3,208	)	$	(35,031	)	$	(38,240	)

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the entire loan portfolio. The appropriate level of the allowance is based on an ongoing analysis of the loan portfolio and represents an amount that management deems adequate to provide for inherent losses, including collective impairment as recognized under ASC 450, “Contingencies”. Collective impairment is calculated based on loans grouped by grade. Another component of the allowance is losses on loans assessed as impaired under ASC 310. The balance of these loans and their related allowance is included in management’s estimation and analysis of the allowance for loan losses. Management and the internal loan review staff evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses quarterly. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated based on a continuing assessment of problem loans, the types of loans, historical loss experience, new lending products, emerging credit trends, changes in the size and character of loan categories and other factors, including its risk rating system, regulatory guidance and economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings resulting from measurements of inherent credit risk in the loan portfolio and estimates of probable losses or impairments of individual loans. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table provides a roll forward of the allowance for loan losses and a breakdown of the ending balance of the allowance based on the Company’s impairment methodology for the periods presented:



	Commercial			Real Estate - Construction		Real Estate - 1-4 Family Mortgage			Real Estate - Commercial Mortgage			Installment and Other⁽¹⁾			Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	3,090		$	1,091	$	18,629		$	23,688		$	1,167		$	47,665
Charge-offs	(119		)	—		(887		)	(60		)	(231		)	(1,297		)
Recoveries	37			5		151			30			7			230
Net (charge-offs) recoveries	(82		)	5		(736		)	(30		)	(224		)	(1,067		)
Provision for loan losses	183			13		496			480			243			1,415
Benefit attributable to FDIC loss-share agreements	(68		)	—		(69		)	5			—			(132		)
Recoveries payable to FDIC	5			—		158			4			—			167
Provision for loan losses charged to operations	120			13		585			489			243			1,450
Ending balance	$	3,128		$	1,109	$	18,478		$	24,147		$	1,186		$	48,048
Period-End Amount Allocated to:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	253		$	—	$	7,285		$	7,724		$	—		$	15,262
Collectively evaluated for impairment	2,875			1,109		11,193			16,423			1,186			32,786
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality	—			—		—			—			—			—
Ending balance	$	3,128		$	1,109	$	18,478		$	24,147		$	1,186		$	48,048



	Commercial			Real Estate - Construction			Real Estate - 1-4 Family Mortgage			Real Estate - Commercial Mortgage			Installment and Other⁽¹⁾			Total
Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning balance	$	3,307		$	711		$	18,347		$	21,416		$	566		$	44,347
Charge-offs	(234		)	—			(614		)	(593		)	(64		)	(1,505		)
Recoveries	157			16			339			91			10			613
Net (charge-offs) recoveries	(77		)	16			(275		)	(502		)	(54		)	(892		)
Provision for loan losses	(53		)	(52		)	1,197			1,825			542			3,459
Benefit attributable to FDIC loss-share agreements	(247		)	—			(261		)	(661		)	—			(1,169		)
Recoveries payable to FDIC	12			1			729			18			—			760
Provision for loan losses charged to operations	(288		)	(51		)	1,665			1,182			542			3,050
Ending balance	$	2,942		$	676		$	19,737		$	22,096		$	1,054		$	46,505
Period-End Amount Allocated to:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	699		$	—		$	8,641		$	8,194		$	—		$	17,534
Collectively evaluated for impairment	2,243			676			11,096			13,902			1,054			28,971
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality	—			—			—			—			—			—
Ending balance	$	2,942		$	676		$	19,737		$	22,096		$	1,054		$	46,505

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)


(1)	Includes lease financing receivables.The following table provides the recorded investment in loans, net of unearned income, based on the Company’s impairment methodology as of the dates presented:



	Commercial		Real Estate - Construction		Real Estate - 1-4 Family Mortgage		Real Estate - Commercial Mortgage		Installment and Other⁽¹⁾		Total
March 31, 2014
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	723	$	—	$	21,831	$	32,523	$	—	$	55,077
Collectively evaluated for impairment	408,547		153,128		1,091,100		1,648,379		85,828		3,386,982
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality	30,846		2,772		98,329		287,256		6,166		425,369
Ending balance	$	440,116	$	155,900	$	1,211,260	$	1,968,158	$	91,994	$	3,867,428
December 31, 2013
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	743	$	—	$	25,374	$	30,624	$	183	$	56,924
Collectively evaluated for impairment	432,736		158,551		1,080,297		1,618,758		84,822		3,375,164
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality	35,484		2,885		102,562		301,190		6,809		448,930
Ending balance	$	468,963	$	161,436	$	1,208,233	$	1,950,572	$	91,814	$	3,881,018


(1)	Includes lease financing receivables.

Note D – Other Real Estate Owned

(In Thousands)

The following table provides details of the Company’s other real estate owned (“OREO”) covered and not covered under a loss-share agreement, net of valuation allowances and direct write-downs as of the dates presented:



	Covered OREO		Not Covered OREO		Total OREO
March 31, 2014
Residential real estate	$	1,671	$	6,466	$	8,137
Commercial real estate	3,083		8,513		11,596
Residential land development	916		10,419		11,335
Commercial land development	4,548		12,125		16,673
Total	$	10,218	$	37,523	$	47,741
December 31, 2013
Residential real estate	$	2,133	$	6,767	$	8,900
Commercial real estate	3,598		8,984		12,582
Residential land development	1,161		12,334		13,495
Commercial land development	6,050		11,860		17,910
Other	—		—		—
Total	$	12,942	$	39,945	$	52,887

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Changes in the Company’s OREO covered and not covered under a loss-share agreement were as follows:



	Covered OREO			Not Covered OREO			Total OREO
Balance at January 1, 2014	$	12,942		$	39,945		$	52,887
Acquired OREO	—			—			—
Transfers of loans	1,031			1,554			2,585
Capitalized improvements	—			—			—
Impairments⁽¹⁾	(1,552		)	(528		)	(2,080		)
Dispositions	(2,232		)	(3,341		)	(5,573		)
Other	29			(107		)	(78		)
Balance at March 31, 2014	$	10,218		$	37,523		$	47,741


(1)	Of the total impairment charges of $1,552 recorded for covered OREO, $310 was included in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2014, while the remaining $1,242 increased the FDIC loss-share indemnification asset.

Components of the line item “Other real estate owned” in the Consolidated Statements of Income were as follows for the periods presented:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2014			2013
Repairs and maintenance	$	781		$	353
Property taxes and insurance	241			353
Impairments	838			986
Net (gain) loss on OREO sales	(114		)	470
Rental income	(45		)	(113		)
Total	$	1,701		$	2,049

Note E – FDIC Loss-Share Indemnification Asset

(In Thousands)

As part of the loan portfolio and OREO fair value estimation in connection with FDIC-assisted acquisitions, a FDIC loss-share indemnification asset is established, which represents the present value as of the acquisition date of the estimated losses on covered assets to be reimbursed by the FDIC. Pursuant to the terms of both of our loss-share agreements, the FDIC is obligated to reimburse the Bank for 80% of all eligible losses with respect to covered assets, beginning with the first dollar of loss incurred. The Bank has a corresponding obligation to reimburse the FDIC for 80% of eligible recoveries with respect to covered assets. The estimated losses are based on the same cash flow estimates used in determining the fair value of the covered assets. The FDIC loss-share indemnification asset is reduced as losses are recognized on covered assets and loss-share payments are received from the FDIC. Realized losses in excess of estimates as of the date of the acquisition increase the FDIC loss-share indemnification asset. Conversely, when realized losses are less than these estimates, the portion of the FDIC loss-share indemnification asset no longer expected to result in a payment from the FDIC is amortized into interest income using the effective interest method.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Changes in the FDIC loss-share indemnification asset were as follows:



Balance at January 1, 2014	$	26,273
Changes in expected cash flows from initial estimates on:
Covered Loans	(90		)
Covered OREO	1,183
Reimbursable expenses	136
Accretion	—
Reimbursements received from the FDIC	(2,539		)

Balance at March 31, 2014	$	24,963

Note F – Mortgage Servicing Rights

(In Thousands)

The Company retains the right to service certain mortgage loans that it sells to secondary market investors. These mortgage servicing rights, included in “Other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are recognized as a separate asset on the date the corresponding mortgage loan is sold. Mortgage servicing rights are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income. These servicing rights are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. Fair value is determined using an income approach with various assumptions including expected cash flows, prepayment speeds, market discount rates, servicing costs, and other factors. Mortgage servicing rights were carried at amortized cost at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Impairment losses on mortgage servicing rights are recognized to the extent by which the unamortized cost exceeds fair value. No impairment losses on mortgage servicing rights were recognized in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

Changes in the Company’s mortgage servicing rights were as follows:



Balance at January 1, 2014	$	8,994
Capitalization	798
Amortization	(278		)

Balance at March 31, 2014	$	9,514

Data and key economic assumptions related to the Company’s mortgage servicing rights as of March 31, 2014 are as follows:



Unpaid principal balance	$	950,600

Weighted-average prepayment speed (CPR)	4.41		%
Estimated impact of a 10% increase	$	(768	)
Estimated impact of a 20% increase	(1,031		)

Discount rate	11.26		%
Estimated impact of a 10% increase	$	(826	)
Estimated impact of a 20% increase	(1,139		)

Weighted-average coupon interest rate	3.71		%
Weighted-average servicing fee (basis points)	25.09
Weighted-average remaining maturity (in years)	24.17

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note G - Employee Benefit and Deferred Compensation Plans

(In Thousands, Except Share Data)

The plan expense for the Company-sponsored noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (“Pension Benefits”) and post-retirement health and life plans (“Other Benefits”) for the periods presented was as follows:



	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	March 31,						March 31,
	2014			2013			2014		2013
Service cost	$	—		$	—		$	6	$	7
Interest cost	318			188			23		12
Expected return on plan assets	(539		)	(311		)	—		—
Prior service cost recognized	—			—			—		—
Recognized actuarial loss	45			97			27		19
Net periodic benefit cost (return)	$	(176	)	$	(26	)	$	56	$	38

There were no stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

In January 2013, the Company granted stock options which generally vest and become exercisable in equal installments of 33 1/3% upon completion of one, two and three years of service measured from the grant date. The fair value of stock option grants is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company employs the following assumptions with respect to its stock option grants in 2013:



	2014 Grant			2013 Grant
Shares granted	—			52,500
Dividend yield	—		%	3.55		%
Expected volatility	—		%	37		%
Risk-free interest rate	—		%	0.76		%
Expected lives				6 years
Weighted average exercise price	$	—		$	19.14
Weighted average fair value	$	—		$	4.47

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

In connection with its merger with First M&F during the third quarter of 2013, the Company assumed First M&F's 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and Stock Option Plan, under which options to purchase an aggregate of 11,557 shares of the Company's common stock were outstanding as of the date of assumption. The assumed options had a weighted average exercise price of $21.16 and a weighted average remaining contractual life of 2.05 years at the date of assumption. The fair value of the stock options assumed on the date of assumption was $68 and was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. No additional options or other forms of equity incentives will be granted or awarded under this plan.

The following table summarizes the changes in stock option grants as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2014:



	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Options outstanding at beginning of period	1,060,350		$	18.64
Assumed from acquisition	—		—
Granted	—		—
Exercised	(61,567	)	14.63
Forfeited	—		—
Options outstanding at end of period	998,783		$	18.89

The Company awards performance-based restricted stock to executives and time-based restricted stock to directors and other officers and employees under a long-term equity incentive plan. The performance-based restricted stock vests upon completion of a one-year service period and the attainment of certain performance goals. Performance-based restricted stock is issued at the target level; the number of shares ultimately awarded is determined at the end of each year and may be increased or decreased depending on the Company falling short of, meeting or exceeding financial performance measures defined by the Board of Directors. Time-based restricted stock vests at the end of the service period defined in the respective grant. The fair value of each restricted stock grant is the closing price of the Company's common stock on the day immediately preceding the grant date. The following table summarizes the changes in restricted stock as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2014:



	Performance-Based Restricted Stock		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value		Time- Based Restricted Stock	Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Nonvested at beginning of period	69,850		$	19.14	22,338	$	24.30
Granted	78,600		31.46		22,500	31.46
Vested	(69,850	)	19.14		—	—
Cancelled	—		—		—	—
Nonvested at end of period	78,600		$	31.46	44,838	$	27.89

During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company reissued 92,727 shares from treasury in connection with the exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted stock. The Company recorded total stock-based compensation expense of $871 and $478 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Note H – Segment Reporting

(In Thousands)

The operations of the Company’s reportable segments are described as follows:


•	The Community Banks segment delivers a complete range of banking and financial services to individuals and small to medium-sized businesses including checking and savings accounts, business and personal loans, equipment leasing, as well as safe deposit and night depository facilities.


•	The Insurance segment includes a full service insurance agency offering all major lines of commercial and personal insurance through major carriers.


•	The Wealth Management segment offers a broad range of fiduciary services which includes the administration and management of trust accounts including personal and corporate benefit accounts, self-directed IRAs, and custodial

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

accounts. In addition, the Wealth Management segment offers annuities, mutual funds and other investment services through a third party broker-dealer.

In order to give the Company’s divisional management a more precise indication of the income and expenses they can control, the results of operations for the Community Banks, the Insurance and the Wealth Management segments reflect the direct revenues and expenses of each respective segment. Indirect revenues and expenses, including but not limited to income from the Company’s investment portfolio, as well as certain costs associated with data processing and back office functions, primarily support the operations of the community banks and, therefore, are included in the results of the Community Banks segment. Included in “Other” are the operations of the holding company and other eliminations which are necessary for purposes of reconciling to the consolidated amounts.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table provides financial information for the Company’s operating segments for the periods presented:



	Community Banks		Insurance		Wealth Management		Other			Consolidated
Three months ended March 31, 2014
Net interest income	$	50,636	$	63	$	311	$	(1,039	)	$	49,971
Provision for loan losses	1,389		—		61		—			1,450
Noninterest income	14,083		2,393		2,116		24			18,616
Noninterest expense	44,125		1,474		1,868		178			47,645
Income (loss) before income taxes	19,205		982		498		(1,193		)	19,492
Income taxes	5,978		380		—		(463		)	5,895
Net income (loss)	13,227		602		498		(730		)	13,597

Total assets	$	5,826,289	$	17,442	$	44,345	$	14,755		$	5,902,831
Goodwill	273,387		2,757		—		—			276,144

Three months ended March 31, 2013
Net interest income	$	33,677	$	23	$	295	$	(614	)	$	33,381
Provision for loan losses	2,917		—		133		—			3,050
Noninterest income	14,547		1,033		1,734		21			17,335
Noninterest expense	35,059		813		1,581		104			37,557
Income (loss) before income taxes	10,248		243		315		(697		)	10,109
Income taxes	2,723		94		—		(279		)	2,538
Net income (loss)	$	7,525	$	149	$	315	$	(418	)	$	7,571

Total assets	$	4,205,826	$	10,214	$	39,673	$	11,945		$	4,267,658
Goodwill	181,996		2,783		—		—			184,779

Note I – Fair Value Measurements

(In Thousands)

Fair Value Measurements and the Fair Level Hierarchy

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities and also establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to a valuation based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1), moderate priority to a valuation based on quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities and/or based on assumptions that are observable in the market (Level 2), and the lowest priority to a valuation based on assumptions that are not observable in the market (Level 3).

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The Company carries certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with applicable standards. The Company’s recurring fair value measurements are based on the requirement to carry such assets and liabilities at fair value or the Company’s election to carry certain eligible assets and liabilities at fair value. Assets and liabilities that are required to be carried at fair value include securities available for sale and derivative instruments. The Company has elected to carry mortgage loans held for sale at fair value on a recurring basis as permitted under the guidance in ASC 825, “Financial Instruments” (“ASC 825”).

The following methods and assumptions are used by the Company to estimate the fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured on a recurring basis:

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Securities available for sale: Securities available for sale consist primarily of debt securities, such as obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations, mortgage-backed securities, trust preferred securities, and other debt and equity securities. Where quoted market prices in active markets are available, securities are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. If quoted prices from active markets are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets, quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments traded in markets that are not active, or model-based valuation techniques where all significant assumptions are observable in the market. Such instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. When assumptions used in model-based valuation techniques are not observable in the market, the assumptions used by management reflect estimates of assumptions used by other market participants in determining fair value. When there is limited transparency around the inputs to the valuation, the instruments are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Derivative instruments: The Company uses derivatives to manage various financial risks. Most of the Company’s derivative contracts are extensively traded in over-the-counter markets and are valued using discounted cash flow models which incorporate observable market based inputs including current market interest rates, credit spreads, and other factors. Such instruments are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and include interest rate swaps and other interest rate contracts such as interest rate caps and/or floors. The Company’s interest rate lock commitments are valued using current market prices for mortgage-backed securities with similar characteristics, adjusted for certain factors including servicing and risk. The value of the Company’s forward commitments is based on current prices for securities backed by similar types of loans. Because these assumptions are observable in active markets, the Company’s interest rate lock commitments and forward commitments are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Mortgage loans held for sale: Mortgage loans held for sale are primarily agency loans which trade in active secondary markets. The fair value of these instruments is derived from current market pricing for similar loans, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics, including servicing and risk. Because the valuation is based on external pricing of similar instruments, mortgage loans held for sale are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table presents assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the dates presented:



	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Totals
March 31, 2014
Financial assets:
Securities available for sale:
Obligations of other U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	—	$	6,115	$	—	$	6,115
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	—		302,982		—		302,982
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	—		165,920		—		165,920
Commercial mortgage-backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	—		42,059		—		42,059
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	—		4,256		—		4,256
Trust preferred securities	—		—		19,378		19,378
Other debt securities	—		19,098		—		19,098
Other equity securities	—		4,470		—		4,470
Total securities available for sale	—		544,900		19,378		564,278
Derivative instruments:
Interest rate contracts	—		1,278		—		1,278
Interest rate lock commitments	—		967		—		967
Forward contracts	—		98		—		98
Total derivative instruments	—		2,343		—		2,343
Mortgage loans held for sale	—		28,433		—		28,433
Total financial assets	$	—	$	575,676	$	19,378	$	595,054
Financial liabilities:
Derivative instruments:
Interest rate swaps	$	—	$	1,899	$	—	$	1,899
Interest rate contracts	—		1,278		—		1,278
Interest rate lock commitments	—		12		—		12
Forward commitments	—		87		—		87
Total derivative instruments	—		3,276		—		3,276
Total financial liabilities	$	—	$	3,276	$	—	$	3,276

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)



	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Totals
December 31, 2013
Financial assets:
Securities available for sale:
Obligations of other U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	—	$	6,068	$	—	$	6,068
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	—		259,992		—		259,992
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	—		146,545		—		146,545
Commercial mortgage-backed securities:
Government agency mortgage backed securities	—		42,041		—		42,041
Government agency collateralized mortgage obligations	—		5,066		—		5,066
Trust preferred securities	—		—		17,671		17,671
Other debt securities	—		19,554		—		19,554
Other equity securities	—		4,317		—		4,317
Total securities available for sale	—		483,583		17,671		501,254
Derivative instruments:
Interest rate swap	—		208		—		208
Interest rate contracts	—		1,812		—		1,812
Interest rate lock commitments	—		464		—		464
Forward commitments	—		335		—		335
Total derivative instruments	—		2,819		—		2,819
Mortgage loans held for sale	—		33,440		—		33,440
Total financial assets	$	—	$	519,842	$	17,671	$	537,513
Financial liabilities:
Derivative instruments:
Interest rate swaps	$	—	$	1,428	$	—	$	1,428
Interest rate contracts	—		1,812		—		1,812
Interest rate lock commitments	—		52		—		52
Forward commitments	—		24		—		24
Total derivative instruments	—		3,316		—		3,316
Total financial liabilities	$	—	$	3,316	$	—	$	3,316

The Company reviews fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in the Company’s ability to observe inputs to the valuation may cause reclassification of certain assets or liabilities within the fair value hierarchy. Transfers between levels of the hierarchy are deemed to have occurred at the end of period. There were no such transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following tables provide a reconciliation for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs, or Level 3 inputs, during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively:



	Securities available for sale
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014	Trust preferred securities			Other equity securities		Total
Balance at January 1, 2014	$	17,671		$	—	$	17,671
Realized gains included in net income	—			—		—
Unrealized gains included in other comprehensive income	1,724			—		1,724
Purchases	—			—		—
Sales	—			—		—
Issues	—			—		—
Settlements	(17		)	—		(17		)
Transfers into Level 3	—			—		—
Transfers out of Level 3	—			—		—
Balance at March 31, 2014	$	19,378		$	—	$	19,378



	Securities available for sale
Three Months Ended March 31, 2013	Trust preferred securities			Other equity securities		Total
Balance at January 1, 2013	$	15,068		$	—	$	15,068
Realized gains included in net income	—			—		—
Unrealized gains included in other comprehensive income	1,878			—		1,878
Reclassification adjustment	—			—		—
Purchases	—			—		—
Sales	—			—		—
Issues	—			—		—
Settlements	(784		)	—		(784		)
Transfers into Level 3	—			—		—
Transfers out of Level 3	—			—		—
Balance at March 31, 2013	$	16,162		$	—	$	16,162

For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no gains or losses included in earnings that were attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses related to assets or liabilities held at the end of each respective period that were measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs.

The following table presents information as of March 31, 2014 about significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) used in the valuation of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:



Financial instrument	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Significant Unobservable Inputs	Range of Inputs
Trust preferred securities	$	19,378	Discounted cash flows	Default rate	0-100%

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

Certain assets may be recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically are a result of the application of the lower of cost or market accounting or a write-down occurring during the period. The following

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

table provides the fair value measurement for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that were still held on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the dates presented and the level within the fair value hierarchy each is classified:



March 31, 2014	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Totals
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	3,255	$	3,255
OREO	—		—		7,221		7,221
Total	$	—	$	—	$	10,476	$	10,476



December 31, 2013	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Totals
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	11,900	$	11,900
OREO	—		—		36,306		36,306
Total	$	—	$	—	$	48,206	$	48,206

The following methods and assumptions are used by the Company to estimate the fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis:

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Impaired loans: Loans considered impaired are reserved for at the time the loan is identified as impaired taking into account the fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs. Collateral may be real estate and/or business assets including but not limited to equipment, inventory and accounts receivable. The fair value of real estate is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers. The fair value of the business assets is generally based on amounts reported on the business’s financial statements. Appraised and reported values may be adjusted based on changes in market conditions from the time of valuation and management’s knowledge of the client and the client’s business. Since not all valuation inputs are observable, these nonrecurring fair value determinations are classified as Level 3. Impaired loans are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly, based on the same factors previously identified. Impaired loans covered under loss-share agreements were recorded at their fair value upon the acquisition date, and no fair value adjustments were necessary for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Impaired loans not covered under loss-share agreements that were measured or re-measured at fair value had a carrying value of $4,107 and $12,998 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, and a specific reserve for these loans of $852 and $1,098 was included in the allowance for loan losses for the periods ended on such respective dates.

Other real estate owned: OREO is comprised of commercial and residential real estate obtained in partial or total satisfaction of loan obligations. OREO covered under loss-share agreements is recorded at its fair value on its acquisition date. OREO not covered under loss-share agreements acquired in settlement of indebtedness is recorded at the fair value of the real estate less estimated costs to sell. Subsequently, it may be necessary to record nonrecurring fair value adjustments for declines in fair value. Fair value, when recorded, is determined based on appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers and adjusted for management’s estimates of costs to sell. Accordingly, values for OREO are classified as Level 3.

The following table presents OREO measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that was still held in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the dates presented:



	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
OREO covered under loss-share agreements:
Carrying amount prior to remeasurement	$	4,170		$	13,067
Impairment recognized in results of operations	(269		)	(707		)
Increase in FDIC loss-share indemnification asset	(1,078		)	(2,829		)
Receivable from other guarantor	(142		)	(768		)
Fair value	$	2,681		$	8,763
OREO not covered under loss-share agreements:
Carrying amount prior to remeasurement	$	5,602		$	30,436
Impairment recognized in results of operations	(1,062		)	(2,893		)
Fair value	$	4,540		$	27,543



Financial instrument	Fair Value	Valuation Technique	Significant Unobservable Inputs	Range of Inputs
Impaired loans	3,255	Appraised value of collateral less estimated costs to sell	Estimated costs to sell	4-10%
OREO	7,221	Appraised value of property less estimated costs to sell	Estimated costs to sell	4-10%

Fair Value Option

The Company elected to measure all mortgage loans originated for sale on or after July 1, 2012 at fair value under the fair value option as permitted under ASC 825. Electing to measure these assets at fair value reduces certain timing differences and better matches the changes in fair value of the loans with changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used to economically hedge them.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Net losses of $64 and $277 resulting from fair value changes of these mortgage loans were recorded in income during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively. The amount does not reflect changes in fair values of related derivative instruments used to hedge exposure to market-related risks associated with these mortgage loans. The change in fair value of both mortgage loans held for sale and the related derivative instruments are recorded in “Gains on sales of mortgage loans held for sale” in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The Company’s valuation of mortgage loans held for sale incorporates an assumption for credit risk; however, given the short-term period that the Company holds these loans, valuation adjustments attributable to instrument-specific credit risk are nominal. Interest income on mortgage loans held for sale measured at fair value is accrued as it is earned based on contractual rates and is reflected in loan interest income on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table summarizes the differences between the fair value and the principal balance for mortgage loans held for sale measured at fair value as of:



March 31, 2014	Aggregate Fair Value		Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance		Difference
Mortgage loans held for sale measured at fair value	$	28,433	$	28,275	$	158
Past due loans of 90 days or more	—		—		—
Nonaccrual loans	—		—		—

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, including those assets and liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis, were as follows as of the dates presented:



			Fair Value
As of March 31, 2014	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	301,615	$	301,615	$	—	$	—	$	301,615
Securities held to maturity	482,410		—		484,780		—		484,780
Securities available for sale	564,278		—		544,900		19,378		564,278
Mortgage loans held for sale	28,433		—		28,433		—		28,433
Loans covered under loss-share agreements	173,545		—		—		174,167		174,167
Loans not covered under loss-share agreements, net	3,645,835		—		—		3,597,806		3,597,806
FDIC loss-share indemnification asset	24,963		—		—		24,963		24,963
Mortgage servicing rights	9,514		—		—		10,485		10,485
Derivative instruments	2,343		—		2,343		—		2,343
Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	5,004,784	$	3,539,545	$	1,470,862	$	—	$	5,010,407
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	74,416		—		79,994		—		79,994
Junior subordinated debentures	94,284		—		78,855		—		78,855
Derivative instruments	3,348		—		3,348		—		3,348

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)



			Fair Value
As of December 31, 2013	Carrying Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	246,648	$	246,648	$	—	$	—	$	246,648
Securities held to maturity	412,075		—		408,567		—		408,567
Securities available for sale	501,254		—		483,583		17,671		501,254
Mortgage loans held for sale	33,440		—		33,440		—		33,440
Loans covered under loss-share agreements	181,674		—		—		182,244		182,244
Loans not covered under loss-share agreements, net	3,651,679		—		—		3,590,446		3,590,446
FDIC loss-share indemnification asset	26,273		—		—		26,273		26,273
Mortgage servicing rights	8,994		—		—		9,840		9,840
Derivative instruments	2,818		—		2,818		—		2,818
Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	4,841,912	$	3,327,688	$	1,520,667	$	—	$	4,848,355
Short-term borrowings	2,283		2,283		—		—		2,283
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	75,405		—		80,989		—		80,989
Junior subordinated debentures	94,187		—		78,301		—		78,301
Derivative instruments	3,096		—		3,096		—		3,096

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis are discussed previously.

Cash and cash equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and due from banks and interest-bearing balances with banks. The carrying amount reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value based on the short-term nature of these assets.

Securities held to maturity: Securities held to maturity consist of debt securities such as obligations of U.S. Government agencies, states, and other political subdivisions. Where quoted market prices in active markets are available, securities are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. If quoted prices from active markets are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets, quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments traded in markets that are not active, or model-based valuation techniques where all significant assumptions are observable in the market. Such instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. When assumptions used in model-based valuation techniques are not observable in the market, the assumptions used by management reflect estimates of assumptions used by other market participants in determining fair value. When there is limited transparency around the inputs to the valuation, the instruments are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Loans covered under loss-share agreements: The fair value of loans covered under loss-share agreements is based on the net present value of future cash proceeds expected to be received using discount rates that are derived from current market rates and reflect the level of interest risk in the covered loans.

Loans not covered under loss-share agreements: For variable-rate loans not covered under loss-share agreements that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values of fixed-rate loans not covered under loss-share agreements, including mortgages and commercial, agricultural and consumer loans, are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality.

FDIC loss-share indemnification asset: The fair value of the FDIC loss-share indemnification asset is based on the net present value of future cash flows expected to be received from the FDIC under the provisions of the loss-share agreements using a discount rate that is based on current market rates for the underlying covered loans. Current market rates are used in light of the uncertainty of the timing and receipt of the loss-share reimbursement from the FDIC.

Mortgage servicing rights: The Company retains the right to service certain mortgage loans that it sells to secondary market investors. These servicing rights are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. Fair value is determined using an income approach with various assumptions including expected cash flows, market discount rates, prepayment speeds, servicing costs, and

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

other factors. Because these factors are not all observable and include management’s assumptions, mortgage servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Mortgage servicing rights were carried at amortized cost at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and no impairment charges were recognized in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Deposits: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits, both interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing, are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. Such deposits are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts are estimated using a discounted cash flow based on currently effective interest rates for similar types of deposits. These deposits are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Short-term borrowings: Short-term borrowings consist of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased. The fair value of these borrowings approximates the carrying value of the amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for each respective account given the short-term nature of the liabilities.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances: The fair value for Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances is determined by discounting the expected future cash outflows using current market rates for similar borrowings, or Level 2 inputs.

Junior subordinated debentures: The fair value for the Company’s junior subordinated debentures is determined by discounting the future cash flows using the current market rate.

Note J - Derivative Instruments

(In Thousands)

The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments, including interest rate contracts such as swaps, caps and/or floors, as part of its ongoing efforts to mitigate its interest rate risk exposure and to facilitate the needs of its customers. The Company also from time to time enters into derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments to help its commercial customers manage their exposure to interest rate fluctuations. To mitigate the interest rate risk associated with these customer contracts, the Company enters into an offsetting derivative contract position. The Company manages its credit risk, or potential risk of default by its commercial customers, through credit limit approval and monitoring procedures. At March 31, 2014, the Company had notional amounts of $73,950 on interest rate contracts with corporate customers and $73,950 in offsetting interest rate contracts with other financial institutions to mitigate the Company’s rate exposure on its corporate customers’ contracts and certain fixed-rate loans.

In March and April 2012, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements effective March 30, 2014 and March 17, 2014, respectively. The Company receives a variable rate of interest based on the three-month LIBOR plus a pre-determined spread and pays a fixed rate of interest. The agreements, which both terminate in March 2022, are accounted for as cash flow hedges to reduce the variability in cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $32,000 of the Company’s junior subordinated debentures.

In connection with its merger with First M&F, the Company assumed an interest rate swap designed to convert floating rate interest payments into fixed rate payments. Based on the terms of the agreement, which terminates in March 2018, the Company receives a variable rate of interest based on the three-month LIBOR plus a pre-determined spread and pays a fixed rate of interest. The interest rate swap is accounted for as a cash flow hedge to reduce the variability in cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $30,000 of the junior subordinated debentures assumed in the merger with First M&F.

In May 2010, the Company terminated two interest rate swaps, each designated as a cash flow hedge, designed to convert the variable interest rate on an aggregate of $75,000 of loans to a fixed rate. As of the termination date, there were $1,679 of deferred gains related to the swaps, which are being amortized into interest income over the designated hedging periods ending in August 2012 and August 2013, respectively. Deferred gains amortized into net interest income were $0 and $85 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

The Company enters into interest rate lock commitments with its customers to mitigate the interest rate risk associated with the commitments to fund fixed-rate residential mortgage loans. The notional amount of commitments to fund fixed-rate mortgage loans was $83,103 and $54,807 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The Company also enters into forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to secondary market investors. The notional amount of commitments to sell residential mortgage loans to secondary market investors was $75,000 and $50,000 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table provides details on the Company’s derivative financial instruments as of the dates presented:



		Fair Value
	Balance Sheet Location	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Derivative assets:
Designated as hedging instruments
Interest rate swap	Other Assets	—		208
Totals		—		208
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	Other Assets	$	1,278	$	1,812
Interest rate lock commitments	Other Assets	967		464
Forward commitments	Other Assets	$	98	$	335
Totals		$	2,343	$	2,611
Derivative liabilities:
Designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swap	Other Liabilities	$	1,899	$	1,428
Totals		$	1,899	$	1,428
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	Other Liabilities	$	1,278	$	1,812
Interest rate lock commitments	Other Liabilities	12		52
Forward commitments	Other Liabilities	87		24
Totals		$	1,377	$	1,888

Gains (losses) included in the Consolidated Statements of Income related to the Company’s derivative financial instruments were as follows as of the periods presented:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2014		2013
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps (terminated May 2010):
Included in interest income on loans	$	—	$	85
Total	$	—	$	85
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts:
Included in interest income on loans	$	779	$	799
Included in other noninterest expense	—		92
Interest rate lock commitments:
Included in gains on sales of mortgage loans held for sale	566		183
Forward commitments
Included in gains on sales of mortgage loans held for sale	189		198
Total	$	1,534	$	1,272

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Offsetting

Certain financial instruments, including derivatives, may be eligible for offset in the consolidated balance sheet when the "right of setoff" exists or when the instruments are subject to an enforceable master netting agreement, which includes the right of the non-defaulting party or non-affected party to offset recognized amounts, including collateral posted with the counterparty, to determine a net receivable or net payable upon early termination of the agreement. Certain of the Company's derivative instruments are subject to master netting agreements; however, the Company has not elected to offset such financial instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table presents the Company's gross derivative positions as recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as well as the net derivative positions, including collateral pledged to the extent the application of such collateral did not reduce the net derivative liability position below zero, had the Company elected to offset those instruments subject to an enforceable master netting agreement:



	Offsetting Derivative Assets				Offsetting Derivative Liabilities
	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Gross amounts recognized	$	2,342	$	2,818	$	3,276	$	3,315
Gross amounts offset in the consolidated balance sheets	—		—		—		—
Net amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets	2,342		2,818		3,276		3,315
Gross amounts not offset in the consolidated balance sheets
Financial instruments	573		1,664		573		1,664
Financial collateral pledged	—		—		—		—
Net amounts	$	1,769	$	1,154	$	2,703	$	1,651

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note K – Other Comprehensive Income

(In Thousands)

Changes in the components of other comprehensive income were as follows for the periods presented:



	Pre-Tax			Tax Expense (Benefit)			Net of Tax
Three months ended March 31, 2014
Securities available for sale:
Unrealized holding gains on securities	$	4,509		$	1,725		$	2,784
Non-credit related portion of other-than-temporary impairment on securities	—			—			—
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income	—			—			—
Amortization of unrealized holding gains on securities transferred to the held to maturity category	(71		)	(27		)	(44		)
Total securities available for sale	4,438			1,698			2,740
Derivative instruments:
Unrealized holding losses on derivative instruments	(679		)	(260		)	(419		)
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income	—			—			—
Total derivative instruments	(679		)	(260		)	(419		)
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans:
Net gain (loss) arising during the period	—			—			—
Amortization of net actuarial loss recognized in net periodic pension cost	73			28			45
Total defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans	73			28			45
Total other comprehensive income	$	3,832		$	1,466		$	2,366
Three months ended March 31, 2013
Securities available for sale:
Unrealized holding gains on securities	$	236		$	90		$	146
Non-credit related portion of other-than-temporary impairment on securities	—			—			—
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income	115			44			71
Amortization of unrealized holding gains on securities transferred to the held to maturity category	(106		)	(40		)	(66		)
Total securities available for sale	245			94			151
Derivative instruments:
Unrealized holding losses on derivative instruments	335			128			207
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income	(85		)	(32		)	(53		)
Total derivative instruments	250			96			154
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans:
Net gain (loss) arising during the period	—			—			—
Amortization of net actuarial loss recognized in net periodic pension cost	116			44			72
Total defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans	116			44			72
Total other comprehensive income	$	611		$	234		$	377

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The accumulated balances for each component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, were as follows as of the dates presented:



	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Unrealized gains on securities	$	13,110		$	10,370
Non-credit related portion of other-than-temporary impairment on securities	(17,428		)	(17,428		)
Unrealized losses on derivative instruments	(431		)	(12		)
Unrecognized defined benefit pension and post-retirement benefit plans obligations	(4,858		)	(4,903		)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(9,607	)	$	(11,973	)

Note L – Net Income Per Common Share

(In Thousands, Except Share Data)

Basic net income per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per common share reflects the pro forma dilution of shares outstanding assuming outstanding stock options were exercised into common shares, calculated in accordance with the treasury method. Basic and diluted net income per common share calculations are as follows for the periods presented:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2014		2013
Basic
Net income applicable to common stock	$	13,597	$	7,571
Average common shares outstanding	31,436,148		25,186,229
Net income per common share - basic	$	0.43	$	0.30
Diluted
Net income applicable to common stock	$	13,597	$	7,571
Average common shares outstanding	31,436,148		25,186,229
Effect of dilutive stock-based compensation	232,214		102,556
Average common shares outstanding - diluted	31,668,362		25,288,785
Net income per common share - diluted	$	0.43	$	0.30

Table of Contents

Renasant Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Stock options that could potentially dilute basic net income per common share in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share due to their anti-dilutive effect were as follows for the periods presented:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2014	2013
Number of shares	107,396	488,824
Range of exercise prices	$17.63 - $29.67	$19.14 - $30.63

Note M – Mergers and Acquisitions

On September 1, 2013, the Company completed its acquisition by merger of First M&F, a bank holding company headquartered in Kosciusko, Mississippi, and the parent of Merchants and Farmers Bank, a Mississippi banking corporation. On the same date, Merchants and Farmers Bank was merged into Renasant Bank. On August 31, 2013, First M&F operated 43 banking and insurance locations in Mississippi, Alabama and Tennessee. The acquisition of First M&F allowed the Company to further its strategic initiatives by expanding its geographic footprint into certain markets of Mississippi, Alabama and Tennessee. The Company issued 6,175,576 shares of its common stock for 100% of the voting equity interests in First M&F. The aggregate transaction value, including the dilutive impact of First M&F’s stock based compensation assumed by the Company, was $156.8 million.

The Company recorded approximately $116.4 million in intangible assets which consist of goodwill of $91,333 and core deposit intangible of $25,033. The fair value of the core deposit intangible is being amortized on an accelerated basis over the estimated useful life, currently expected to be approximately 10 years. The intangible assets are not deductible for income tax purposes.

The Company assumed $30.9 million in fixed/floating rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures payable to First M&F Statutory Trust I that mature in March 2036. The acquired subordinated debentures require interest to be paid quarterly at a rate of 90-day LIBOR plus 1.33%. The fair value adjustment on the junior subordinated debentures of $12,371 will be amortized on a straight line basis over the remaining life.

The following table summarizes the allocation of purchase price to assets and liabilities acquired in connection with the Company’s acquisition of First M&F based on their fair values on September 1, 2013. The Company is finalizing the fair value of certain assets and liabilities. As a result, the adjustments included in the following table are preliminary and may change.

Table of Contents



Allocation of Purchase Price for First M&F Corporation.
Purchase Price:
Shares issued to common shareholders	6,175,576
Purchase price per share	$	25.17
Value of stock paid				$	155,439
Cash paid for fractional shares				17
Fair value of stock based compensation assumed				68
Deal charges				1,310
Total Purchase Price				$	156,834
Net Assets Acquired:
Stockholders’ equity at 9/1/13	$	79,440
Increase (decrease) to net assets as a result of fair value adjustments to assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Securities	253
Loans, net of First M&F's allowance for loan losses⁽¹⁾	(45,751		)
Fixed assets	(3,070		)
Core deposits intangible, net of First M&F’s existing core deposit intangible	21,158
Other real estate owned⁽¹⁾	(5,797		)
Other assets	(443		)
Deposits	(3,207		)
Junior Subordinated Debt	12,371
Other liabilities	1,748
Deferred income taxes	8,799
Total Net Assets Acquired				65,501
Goodwill resulting from merger⁽²⁾				$	91,333

(1) The fair value adjustments to acquired loans and other real estate owned reflect management’s expectations to more aggressively market and liquidate problem assets quickly.

(2) The goodwill resulting from the merger has been assigned to the Community Banks operating segment.

The following table summarizes the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at acquisition date in connection with the merger with First M&F. The Company is finalizing the fair value of certain fixed assets and liabilities associated with First M&F's mortgage operations. As a result, the values included in the following table are preliminary and may change.



Cash and cash equivalents	$	170,005
Securities	227,693
Mortgage loans held for sale	1,659
Loans, net of unearned income	899,246
Premises and equipment	32,259
Other real estate owned	13,527
Intangible assets	116,366
Other assets	55,848
Total assets	1,516,603

Deposits	1,325,872
Borrowings	25,346
Other liabilities	9,861

The following unaudited pro forma combined condensed consolidated financial information presents the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 of the Company as though the merger with First M&F had been completed as of the beginning of 2013.

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2013
Interest income	$	54,854
Interest expense	7,706
Net interest income	47,148
Provision for loan losses	4,330
Noninterest income	23,080
Noninterest expense	51,646
Income before income taxes	14,252
Income taxes	3,817
Net income	$	10,435
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.33
Diluted	$	0.33

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(In Thousands, Except Share Data)

This Form 10-Q may contain or incorporate by reference statements regarding Renasant Corporation (referred to herein as the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “us”) which may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking statements usually include words such as “expects,” “projects,” “proposes,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “strategy,” “plan,” “potential,” “possible” and other similar expressions. Prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements.

Important factors currently known to management that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include (1) the Company’s ability to efficiently integrate acquisitions, including the acquisition of First M&F Corporation, into its operations, retain the customers of these businesses and grow the acquired operations; (2) the effect of economic conditions and interest rates on a national, regional or international basis; (3) the timing of the implementation of changes in operations to achieve enhanced earnings or effect cost savings; (4) competitive pressures in the consumer finance, commercial finance, insurance, financial services, asset management, retail banking, mortgage lending and auto lending industries; (5) the financial resources of, and products available to, competitors; (6) changes in laws and regulations, including changes in accounting standards; (7) changes in policy by regulatory agencies; (8) changes in the securities and foreign exchange markets; (9) the Company’s potential growth, including its entrance or expansion into new markets, and the need for sufficient capital to support that growth; (10) changes in the quality or composition of the Company’s loan or investment portfolios, including adverse developments in borrower industries or in the repayment ability of individual borrowers; (11) an insufficient allowance for loan losses as a result of inaccurate assumptions; (12) general economic, market or business conditions; (13) changes in demand for loan products and financial services; (14) concentration of credit exposure; (15) changes or the lack of changes in interest rates, yield curves and interest rate spread relationships; and (16) other circumstances, many of which are beyond management’s control. Management undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time.

Financial Condition

The following discussion provides details regarding the changes in significant balance sheet accounts at March 31, 2014 compared to December 31, 2013.

Acquisition of First M&F Corporation

On September 1, 2013, the Company completed its acquisition of First M&F, a bank holding company headquartered in Kosciusko, Mississippi, and the Bank completed its acquisition of First M&F's wholly-owned subsidiary, Merchants and Farmers Bank. Prior to the merger, First M&F operated 35 full-service banking offices and eight insurance offices throughout Mississippi, Tennessee and Alabama. The Company issued approximately 6.2 million shares of its common stock for 100% of the voting equity interests in First M&F in a transaction valued at $156,834. Including the effect of purchase accounting adjustments, the Company acquired assets with a fair value of $1,516,603 including loans with a fair value of $899,246, and assumed liabilities with a fair value of $1,361,079, including deposits with a fair value of $1,325,872. At the acquisition date, approximately $91,333 of goodwill and $25,033 of core deposit intangible assets were recorded. See Note M, “Mergers and Acquisitions,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1, “Financial Statements,” for additional details regarding the Company’s merger with First M&F.

Assets

Total assets were $5,902,831 at March 31, 2014 compared to $5,746,270 at December 31, 2013.

Investments

The securities portfolio is used to provide a source for meeting liquidity needs and to supply securities to be used in collateralizing certain deposits and other types of borrowings. The following table shows the carrying value of our securities portfolio by investment type and the percentage of such investment type relative to the entire securities portfolio as of the dates presented:

Table of Contents



	March 31, 2014		Percentage of Portfolio		December 31, 2013		Percentage of Portfolio
Obligations of other U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	191,171	18.26	%	$	131,129	14.36	%
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	297,354		28.41		287,014		31.43
Mortgage-backed securities	515,217		49.22		453,644		49.67
Trust preferred securities	19,378		1.85		17,671		1.93
Other debt securities	19,098		1.82		19,554		2.14
Other equity securities	4,470		0.44		4,317		0.47
	$	1,046,688	100.00	%	$	913,329	100.00	%

The balance of our securities portfolio at March 31, 2014 increased $133,359 to $1,046,688 from $913,329 at December 31, 2013. During the first three months of 2014, we purchased $204,966 in investment securities. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), in the aggregate, comprised 37.22% of the purchases. CMOs are included in the “Mortgage-backed securities” line item in the above table. The mortgage-backed securities and CMOs held in our investment portfolio are primarily issued by government sponsored entities. U.S. Government Agency securities and municipal securities accounted for 56.10% and 6.68%, respectively, of total securities purchased in the first quarter of 2014. There were no securities sold during the first three months of 2014. Maturities and calls of securities during the first three months of 2014 totaled $74,959.

The Company holds investments in pooled trust preferred securities. This portfolio had a cost basis of $27,514 and $27,531 and a fair value of $19,378 and $17,671 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The investment in pooled trust preferred securities consists of four securities representing interests in various tranches of trusts collateralized by debt issued by over 340 financial institutions. Management’s determination of the fair value of each of its holdings is based on the current credit ratings, the known deferrals and defaults by the underlying issuing financial institutions and the degree to which future deferrals and defaults would be required to occur before the cash flow for our tranches is negatively impacted. The Company’s quarterly evaluation of these investments for other-than-temporary-impairment resulted in no additional write-downs during the first quarter of 2014 or 2013. Furthermore, based on the qualitative factors discussed above, each of the four pooled trust preferred securities was classified as a nonaccruing asset at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Investment interest income is recorded on the cash-basis method until qualifying for return to accrual status.

Loans

The table below sets forth the balance of loans outstanding by loan type and the percentage of each loan type to total loans as of the dates presented:



	March 31, 2014		Percentage of Total Loans		December 31, 2013		Percentage of Total Loans
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	440,116	11.38	%	$	468,963	12.08	%
Lease financing	612		0.02		52		0.01
Real estate – construction	155,900		4.03		161,436		4.16
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	1,211,260		31.32		1,208,233		31.13
Real estate – commercial mortgage	1,968,158		50.89		1,950,572		50.26
Installment loans to individuals	91,382		2.36		91,762		2.36
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	3,867,428	100.00	%	$	3,881,018	100.00	%

Loan concentrations are considered to exist when there are amounts loaned to a number of borrowers engaged in similar activities which would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. At March 31, 2014, there were no concentrations of loans exceeding 10% of total loans which are not disclosed as a category of loans in the categories table above.

Total loans at March 31, 2014 were $3,867,428, a decrease of $13,590 from $3,881,018 at December 31, 2013. Loans covered under loss-share agreements with the FDIC (referred to as “covered loans”) were $173,545 at March 31, 2014, a decrease of $8,129, or 4.48% compared to $181,674 at December 31, 2013. For covered loans, the FDIC will reimburse Renasant Bank 80% of the losses incurred on these loans. Management intends to continue the Company’s aggressive efforts to bring those covered loans that are commercial in nature to resolution and thus the balance of covered loans is expected to continue to decline. The loss-share agreements applicable to this portfolio provide reimbursement for five years from the acquisition date.

Table of Contents

Loans not covered under loss-share agreements with the FDIC (sometimes referred to as “not covered loans”) at March 31, 2014 were $3,693,883, compared to $3,699,344 at December 31, 2013. Loans acquired from First M&F totaled $746,047 at March 31, 2014 compared to $813,543 at December 31, 2013. Excluding the loans acquired from First M&F, not covered loans increased $62,035 during the first three months of 2014. The increase in loans not covered under loss-share agreements was attributable to growth in owner and non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans and commercial loans, as well as loan production generated by our de novo expansion. Loans from our de novo locations in Columbus and Starkville, Mississippi, Tuscaloosa and Montgomery, Alabama and Maryville, Bristol, Jonesborough and Johnson City, Tennessee contributed $28,148 from December 31, 2013.

During the first three months of 2014, loans in our de novo markets of Mississippi, Tennessee and Alabama, excluding the contribution from First M&F, increased $14,056, $7,987 and $6,105, respectively.

The following table provides a breakdown of covered loans and loans not covered under loss-share agreements as of the dates presented:



	March 31, 2014
	Not Acquired		Acquired and Covered Under Loss Share		Acquired M&F		Total Loans
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	347,828	$	8,283	$	84,005	$	440,116
Lease financing	612		—		—		612
Real estate – construction:
Residential	70,532		1,648		4,275		76,455
Commercial	78,528		—		—		78,528
Condominiums	389		—		528		917
Total real estate – construction	149,449		1,648		4,803		155,900
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage:
Primary	536,268		16,378		149,597		702,243
Home equity	202,144		12,100		33,658		247,902
Rental/investment	145,128		19,208		29,253		193,589
Land development	57,720		4,566		5,240		67,526
Total real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	941,260		52,252		217,748		1,211,260
Real estate – commercial mortgage:
Owner-occupied	572,769		51,785		187,967		812,521
Non-owner occupied	752,969		30,252		202,881		986,102
Land development	115,666		29,300		24,569		169,535
Total real estate – commercial mortgage	1,441,404		111,337		415,417		1,968,158
Installment loans to individuals	67,283		25		24,074		91,382
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	2,947,836	$	173,545	$	746,047	$	3,867,428

Table of Contents



	December 31, 2013
	Not Acquired		Acquired and Covered Under Loss Share		Acquired M&F		Total Loans
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	341,600	$	9,546	$	117,817	$	468,963
Lease financing	52		—		—		52
Real estate – construction:
Residential	62,577		1,648		7,907		72,132
Commercial	84,498		—		4,279		88,777
Condominiums			—		527		527
Total real estate – construction	147,075		1,648		12,713		161,436
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage:
Primary	531,956		16,586		153,909		702,451
Home equity	196,387		13,167		34,482		244,036
Rental/investment	142,488		19,754		31,124		193,366
Land development	57,971		4,959		5,450		68,380
Total real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	928,802		54,466		224,965		1,208,233
Real estate – commercial mortgage:
Owner-occupied	563,104		54,294		172,520		789,918
Non-owner occupied	727,744		31,855		229,559		989,158
Land development	113,769		29,837		27,890		171,496
Total real estate – commercial mortgage	1,404,617		115,986		429,969		1,950,572
Installment loans to individuals	63,655		28		28,079		91,762
Total loans, net of unearned income	$	2,885,801	$	181,674	$	813,543	$	3,881,018

Mortgage loans held for sale were $28,433 at March 31, 2014 compared to $33,440 at December 31, 2013. Originations of mortgage loans to be sold totaled $104,354 in the first three months of 2014 compared to $159,141 for the same period in 2013. Mortgage rates in the latter half of 2011 declined to historic lows and remained at these historically low levels throughout the first quarter of 2013, which prompted a significant increase in refinancings and, thus mortgage originations during this time period. Beginning in the second quarter of 2013 and continuing through the first quarter of 2014, mortgage rates increased from these historically low levels, resulting in a slowdown in originations. The increase in mortgage rates could result in lower future mortgage originations as refinancings decrease.

Mortgage loans to be sold are sold either on a “best efforts” basis or under a mandatory delivery sales agreement. Under a “best efforts” sales agreement, residential real estate originations are locked in at a contractual rate with third party private investors or directly with government sponsored agencies, and the Company is obligated to sell the mortgages to such investors only if the mortgages are closed and funded. The risk we assume is conditioned upon loan underwriting and market conditions in the national mortgage market. Under a mandatory delivery sales agreement, the Company commits to deliver a certain principal amount of mortgage loans to an investor at a specified price and delivery date. Penalties are paid to the investor if we fail to satisfy the contract. Gains and losses are realized at the time consideration is received and all other criteria for sales treatment have been met. These loans are typically sold within thirty days after the loan is funded. Although loan fees and some interest income are derived from mortgage loans held for sale, the main source of income is gains from the sale of these loans in the secondary market.

Deposits

The Company relies on deposits as its major source of funds. Total deposits were $5,004,784 and $4,841,912 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Noninterest-bearing deposits were $914,964 and $856,020 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, while interest-bearing deposits were $4,089,820 and $3,985,892 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The increase in total deposits at March 31, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013 is primarily attributable to management’s focus on growing and maintaining a stable source of funding, specifically core deposits, and allowing more costly deposits, including certain time deposits, to mature. In addition, the increase in total deposits is partially attributable to a seasonal increase in public fund deposits.The source of funds that we select depends on the terms and how those terms assist us in mitigating interest rate risk and maintaining our net interest margin. Accordingly, funds are only acquired when needed and

Table of Contents

at a rate that is prudent under the circumstances. Deposits from our de novo locations have also contributed to the increase in deposits during the first three months of 2014. Deposits from our de novo locations in Columbus and Starkville, Mississippi, Tuscaloosa and Montgomery, Alabama and Maryville and Jonesborough, Tennessee totaled $317,173 at March 31, 2014 representing an increase of $45,496 from December 31, 2013.

Public fund deposits are those of counties, municipalities, or other political subdivisions and may be readily obtained based on the Company’s pricing bid in comparison with competitors. Since public fund deposits are obtained through a bid process, these deposit balances may fluctuate as competitive and market forces change. The Company has focused on growing stable sources of deposits which has resulted in the Company relying less on public fund deposits. However, the Company continues to participate in the bidding process for public fund deposits. Our public fund transaction accounts are principally obtained from municipalities including school boards and utilities. Public fund deposits were $510,762 and $420,539 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Deposits in our Alabama and Georgia markets decreased $22,586 and $20,769, respectively, at March 31, 2014 from December 31, 2013. Deposits in our Mississippi and Tennessee markets increased $51,456 and $16,626, respectively, at March 31, 2014 from December 31, 2013.

Borrowed Funds

Total borrowings include securities sold under agreements to repurchase, federal funds purchased, advances from the FHLB and junior subordinated debentures and are classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either short-term borrowings or long-term debt. Short-term borrowings have original maturities less than one year and typically include securities sold under agreements to repurchase, federal funds purchased and FHLB advances. There were no short-term borrowings on the balance sheet at March 31, 2014, which is a decrease of $2,283 from December 31, 2013.

At March 31, 2014, long-term debt totaled $168,700 compared to $169,592 at December 31, 2013. Funds are borrowed from the FHLB primarily to match-fund against certain loans, negating interest rate exposure when rates rise. Such match-funded loans are typically large, fixed rate commercial or real estate loans with long-term maturities. FHLB advances were $74,416 and $75,405 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. At March 31, 2014, $6,582 of the total FHLB advances outstanding were scheduled to mature within twelve (12) months or less. The Company had $1,609,519 of availability on unused lines of credit with the FHLB at March 31, 2014 compared to $1,595,864 at December 31, 2013. The cost of our FHLB advances was 4.19% and 4.25% for the first three months of 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 as Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013

Net Income

Net income for the three month period ended March 31, 2014 was $13,597 compared to net income of $7,571 for the three month period ended March 31, 2013. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three month period ended March 31, 2014 were $0.43 as compared to $0.30 for the three month period ended March 31, 2013. The increase in net income and earnings per share in the first quarter 2014 as compared to the first quarter of 2013 was due primarily to the acquisition of First M&F, improvement in our net interest margin and continued improvement in our credit risk profile.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income, the difference between interest earned on assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, is the largest component of our net income, comprising 73.49% of total net revenue for the first quarter of 2014. Total net revenue consists of net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis and noninterest income. The primary concerns in managing net interest income are the volume, mix and repricing of assets and liabilities.

Net interest income increased to $49,971 for the first quarter of 2014 compared to $33,381 for the same period in 2013. On a tax equivalent basis, net interest income was $51,605 for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $34,808 for the first quarter of 2013. Net interest margin, the tax equivalent net yield on earning assets, increased to 4.04% during the first quarter of 2014 compared to 3.89% for the first quarter of 2013. Net interest margin and net interest income are influenced by internal and external factors. Internal factors include balance sheet changes on both volume and mix and pricing decisions. External factors include changes in market interest rates, competition and the shape of the interest rate yield curve.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth average balance sheet data, including all major categories of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, together with the interest earned or interest paid and the average yield or average rate paid on each such category for the periods presented:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2014						2013
	Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate		Average Balance		Interest Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Loans⁽¹⁾	$	3,888,673	$	49,767	5.19	%	$	2,826,965	$	34,324	4.92	%
Securities:
Taxable⁽²⁾	712,102		3,977		2.23		475,150		2,767		2.36
Tax-exempt	290,417		3,868		5.33		223,713		3,232		5.86
Interest-bearing balances with banks	286,877		199		0.28		104,931		49		0.19
Total interest-earning assets	5,178,069		57,811		4.52		3,630,759		40,372		4.51
Cash and due from banks	93,578						163,321
Intangible assets	303,599						190,787
FDIC loss-share indemnification asset	25,309						44,291
Other assets	327,329						177,253
Total assets	$	5,927,884					$	4,206,411
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Interest-bearing demand⁽³⁾	$	2,243,068	$	1,135	0.21	%	$	1,492,237	$	922	0.25	%
Savings deposits	336,655		72		0.09		246,801		120		0.20
Time deposits	1,495,022		3,166		0.86		1,204,209		3,038		1.02
Total interest-bearing deposits	4,074,745		4,373		0.35		2,943,247		4,080		0.56
Borrowed funds	170,091		1,833		4.35		163,981		1,484		3.67
Total interest-bearing liabilities	4,244,836		6,206		0.59		3,107,228		5,564		0.73
Noninterest-bearing deposits	949,317						549,514
Other liabilities	60,685						48,035
Shareholders’ equity	673,046						501,634
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	5,927,884					$	4,206,411
Net interest income/net interest margin			$	51,605	4.04	%			$	34,808	3.89	%


⁽¹⁾	Includes mortgage loans held for sale and shown net of unearned income.


⁽²⁾	U.S. Government and some U.S. Government agency securities are tax-exempt in the states in which we operate.


⁽³⁾	Interest-bearing demand deposits include interest-bearing transactional accounts and money market deposits.

The average balances of nonaccruing assets are included in the table above. Interest income and weighted average yields on tax-exempt loans and securities have been computed on a fully tax equivalent basis assuming a federal tax rate of 35% and a state tax rate of 3.3%, which is net of federal tax benefit.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in interest earned, on a tax equivalent basis, and interest paid resulting from changes in volume and rates for the Company for the first quarter of 2014 compared to the first quarter of 2013:



	Volume		Rate			Net⁽¹⁾
Interest income:
Loans ⁽²⁾	$	13,474	$	1,969		$	15,443
Securities:
Taxable	1,360		(150		)	1,210
Tax-exempt	913		(277		)	636
Interest-bearing balances with banks	118		32			150
Total interest-earning assets	15,865		1,574			17,439
Interest expense:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	313		(99		)	214
Savings deposits	86		(134		)	(48		)
Time deposits	370		(242		)	128
Borrowed funds	59		291			350
Total interest-bearing liabilities	828		(184		)	644
Change in net interest income	$	15,037	$	1,758		$	16,795


⁽¹⁾	Changes in interest due to both volume and rate have been allocated on a pro-rata basis using the absolute ratio value of amounts calculated.


⁽²⁾	Includes mortgage loans held for sale and shown net of unearned income.

Interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, was $57,811 for the first quarter of 2014 compared to $40,372 for the same period in 2013. This increase in interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, is due primarily to the acquisition of First M&F which contributed to an increase in average earning assets. The following table presents the percentage of total average earning assets, by type and yield, for the periods presented:



	Percentage of Total				Yield
	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	March 31,				March 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Loans	75.10	%	77.86	%	5.19	%	4.92	%
Securities	19.36		19.25		3.17		3.48
Other	5.54		2.89		0.28		0.22
Total earning assets	100.00	%	100.00	%	4.53	%	4.71	%

For the first quarter of 2014, loan income, on a tax equivalent basis, increased $15,443 to $49,767 from $34,324 compared to the same period in 2013. The average balance of loans increased $1,061,708 from first quarter of 2014 compared to the first quarter of 2013 due in large part to the First M&F merger. The tax equivalent yield on loans was 5.19%, a 27 basis point increase from the first quarter of 2013. The increase in loan yields was a result of accretion of nonaccretable difference due to higher than expected levels of payoffs from the First M&F portfolio, offset partially by replacing higher rate maturing loans with new or renewed loans at current market rates which are generally lower due to the current interest rate environment.

Table of Contents

Investment income, on a tax equivalent basis, increased $1,846 to $7,845 for the first quarter of 2014 from $5,999 for the first quarter of 2013. The average balance in the investment portfolio for the first quarter of 2014 was $1,002,519 compared to $698,863 for the same period in 2013. The increase in the average balance of the investment portfolio is due primarily to the First M&F merger. The tax equivalent yield on the investment portfolio for the first quarter of 2014 was 3.17%, down 31 basis points from the same period in 2013. The decline in yield was a result of the reinvestment of cash flows from the Company’s portfolio that had higher rates than the rates on the securities that the Company purchased with the proceeds the Company received from the maturity or call of the securities with higher rates. The reinvestment rates on securities were lower due to the generally lower interest rate environment.

Interest expense was $6,206 for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $5,564 for the same period in 2013. The increase in interest expense was due to an increase average balance of interest bearing liabilities due to the First M&F merger partially offset by a decrease in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities as a result of the declining interest rate environment and a change in the mix of our interest-bearing liabilities in which we utilized lower cost deposits to replace higher costing liabilities, specifically time deposits and borrowed funds. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 0.59% for the three months ending March 31, 2014 as compared to 0.73% at March 31, 2013.

The following table presents, by type, the Company’s funding sources, which consist of total average deposits and borrowed funds, and the total cost of each funding source for the periods presented:



	Percentage of Total				Cost of Funds
	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	March 31,				March 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Noninterest-bearing demand	18.28	%	15.03	%	—	%	—	%
Interest-bearing demand	43.18		40.81		0.21		0.25
Savings	6.48		6.75		0.09		0.20
Time deposits	28.78		32.93		0.86		1.02
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	1.44		2.26		4.19		4.25
Other borrowed funds	1.84		2.22		4.47		3.08
Total deposits and borrowed funds	100.00	%	100.00	%	0.48	%	0.62	%

Interest expense on deposits was $4,373 and $4,080 for the first quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively. The cost of interest-bearing deposits was 0.35% and 0.56% for the same periods. Interest expense on total borrowings was $1,833 and $1,484 for the first quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively. A more detailed discussion of the cost of our funding sources is set forth below under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in this item.

Noninterest Income



Noninterest Income to Average Assets (Excludes securities gains/losses)
Three Months Ended March 31,
2014		2013
1.27%		1.67%

Total noninterest income includes fees generated from deposit services, mortgage loan originations, insurance products, trust and other wealth management products and services, bargain purchase gain resulting from certain acquisitions, security gains and all other noninterest income. Our focus is to develop and enhance our products that generate noninterest income in order to diversify our revenue sources. Noninterest income was $18,616 for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $17,335 for the same period in 2013. The increase in noninterest income and its related components is primarily attributable to the First M&F acquisition.

Service charges on deposit accounts include maintenance fees on accounts, per item charges, account enhancement charges for additional packaged benefits and overdraft fees. Service charges on deposit accounts were $5,916 and $4,500 for the first quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively. Overdraft fees, the largest component of service charges on deposits, were $4,631 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $3,614 for the same period in 2013. The increase in service charge revenues is primarily a result of the First M&F acquisition.

Table of Contents

Fees and commissions increased to $4,972 during the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $4,831 for the same period in 2013. Fees and commissions include fees related to deposit services, such as interchange fees on debit card transactions, as well as fees charged on mortgage loans originated to be sold, such as origination, underwriting, documentation and other administrative fees. Mortgage loan fees decreased to $1,445 during the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $1,757 for the same period in 2013 as a direct result of the lower levels of mortgage originations between the periods. For the first quarter of 2014, fees associated with debit card usage were $2,730 as compared to $2,054 for the same period in 2013.

Through Renasant Insurance, we offer a range of commercial and personal insurance products through major insurance carriers. Income earned on insurance products was $1,863 and $818 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Contingency income is a bonus received from the insurance underwriters and is based both on commission income and claims experience on our clients’ policies during the previous year. Contingency income, which is included in "Other noninterest income" in the Consolidated Statements of Income, was $528 and $174 for the three months ending March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The First M&F acquisition is a significant contributing factor to the increase in insurance commissions and contingency income for 2014.

The Trust division within the Wealth Management segment operates on a custodial basis which includes administration of benefit plans, as well as accounting and money management for trust accounts. The division manages a number of trust accounts inclusive of personal and corporate benefit accounts, self-directed IRAs, and custodial accounts. Fees for managing these accounts are based on changes in market values of the assets under management in the account, with the amount of the fee depending on the type of account. Additionally, the Financial Services division within the Wealth Management segment provides specialized products and services to our customers, which include fixed and variable annuities, mutual funds, and stocks offered through a third party provider. Wealth Management revenue was $2,144 for the first quarter of 2014 compared to $1,724 for the same period in 2013. The market value of trust assets under management was $2,582,446 and $2,324,627 at March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013, respectively.

Gains on sales of securities for the first quarter of 2013 were $54, resulting from the sale of approximately $13,409 in securities. The Company did not sell any securities during the first quarter of 2014.

Gains on the sale of mortgage loans held for sale were $1,585 and $3,565 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Originations of mortgage loans to be sold totaled $104,353 for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $159,141 for the same period of 2013.

Noninterest Expense



Noninterest Expense to Average Assets
Three Months Ended March 31,
2014		2013
3.26%		3.62%

Noninterest expense was $47,645 and $37,557 for the first quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in noninterest expense and its related components is primarily attributable to the First M&F acquisition. Merger expense related to the First M&F acquisition was $195 for the three months ended, March 31, 2014. There were no merger related expenses for the same period in 2013.

Salaries and employee benefits increased $7,154 to $28,428 for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $21,274 for the same period in 2013.

Data processing costs increased to $2,695 in the first quarter of 2014 from $2,043 for the same period in 2013. The increase for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013 was attributable to the addition of the First M&F deposit and loan customer databases, offset by cost savings achieved through efforts to improve the cost structure of loan and deposit processing by renegotiating contracts with data processing service providers.

Net occupancy and equipment expense for the first quarter of 2014 was $4,847, up from $3,604 for the same period in 2013.

Expenses related to other real estate owned for the first quarter of 2014 were $1,701 compared to $2,049 for the same period in 2013. Expenses on other real estate owned for the first quarter of 2014 include write downs of $838 of the carrying value to fair value on certain pieces of property held in other real estate owned. Other real estate owned with a cost basis of $5,573 was sold during the three months ended March 31, 2014, resulting in a net gain of $114. Expenses on other real estate owned for the three months ended March 31, 2013 included a $986 write down of the carrying value to fair value on certain pieces of property held

Table of Contents

in other real estate owned. Other real estate owned with a cost basis of $17,822 was sold during the three months ended March 31, 2013, resulting in a net loss of $470.

Professional fees include fees for legal and accounting services. Professional fees were $1,200 for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $1,173 for the same period in 2013. The increase in professional fees is in large part attributable to additional legal, accounting and consulting fees associated with compliance costs of newly enacted as well as existing banking and governmental regulation. Professional fees attributable to legal fees associated with loan workouts and foreclosure proceedings remain at higher levels in correlation with the overall economic downturn and credit deterioration identified in our loan portfolio and the Company’s efforts to bring these credits to resolution.

Advertising and public relations expense was $1,528 for the first quarter of 2014 compared to $1,490 for the same period in 2013.

Amortization of intangible assets totaled $1,471 and $323 for the first quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively. This amortization relates to finite-lived intangible assets which are being amortized over the useful lives as determined at acquisition. These finite-lived intangible assets have remaining estimated useful lives ranging from one and a half to thirteen years. The increase in amortization of intangible assets is attributable to amortization of finite-lived intangible assets associated with the acquisition of First M&F.

Communication expenses, those expenses incurred for communication to clients and between employees, were $1,682 for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to $1,127 for the same period in 2013.



Efficiency Ratio
Three Months Ended March 31,
2014		2013
67.85%		72.03%

The efficiency ratio is one measure of productivity in the banking industry. This ratio is calculated to measure the cost of generating one dollar of revenue. That is, the ratio is designed to reflect the percentage of one dollar which must be expended to generate that dollar of revenue. The Company calculates this ratio by dividing noninterest expense by the sum of net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis and noninterest income. We remain committed to aggressively managing our costs within the framework of our business model. We expect the efficiency ratio to improve from levels reported in 2013 and 2012 from incremental revenue driven by growth from the additional markets added via the First M&F acquisition in 2013 and the maturity of the Company’s de novo locations and continued reduction in credit related costs as credit quality improves.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense for the first quarter of 2014 and 2013 was $5,895 and $2,538, respectively. The effective tax rates for those periods were 30.24% and 25.11%, respectively. The increased effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013 is the result of the Company experiencing improvements in its financial results throughout 2013 and into the first quarter of 2014 as well as higher levels of taxable income as a result of the merger with First M&F.

Risk Management

The management of risk is an on-going process. Primary risks that are associated with the Company include credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Credit risk and interest rate risk are discussed below, while liquidity risk is discussed in the next subsection under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Credit Risk and Allowance for Loan Losses

Inherent in any lending activity is credit risk, that is, the risk of loss should a borrower default. Credit risk is monitored and managed on an ongoing basis by a credit administration department, senior loan committee, a loss management committee and the Board of Directors loan committee. Credit quality, adherence to policies and loss mitigation are major concerns of credit administration and these committees. The Company’s central appraisal review department reviews and approves third-party appraisals obtained by the Company on real estate collateral and monitors loan maturities to ensure updated appraisals are obtained. This department is managed by a licensed real estate appraiser and employs an additional three licensed appraisers.

We have a number of documented loan policies and procedures that set forth the approval and monitoring process of the lending function. Adherence to these policies and procedures is monitored by management and the Board of Directors. A number of committees and an underwriting staff oversee the lending operations of the Company. These include in-house loan and loss

Table of Contents

management committees and the Board of Directors loan committee and problem loan review committee. In addition, we maintain a loan review staff to independently monitor loan quality and lending practices. Loan review personnel monitor and, if necessary, adjust the grades assigned to loans through periodic examination, focusing its review on commercial and real estate loans rather than consumer and consumer mortgage loans.

In compliance with loan policy, the lending staff is given lending limits based on their knowledge and experience. In addition, each lending officer’s prior performance is evaluated for credit quality and compliance as a tool for establishing and enhancing lending limits. Before funds are advanced on consumer and commercial loans below certain dollar thresholds, loans are reviewed and scored using centralized underwriting methodologies. Loan quality or “risk-rating” grades are assigned based upon certain factors, which include the scoring of the loans. This information is used to assist management in monitoring the credit quality. Loan requests of amounts greater than an officer’s lending limits are reviewed by senior credit officers, in-house loan committees or the Board of Directors.

For commercial and commercial real estate secured loans, risk-rating grades are assigned by lending, credit administration or loan review personnel, based on an analysis of the financial and collateral strength and other credit attributes underlying each loan. Loan grades range from 1 to 9, with 1 being loans with the least credit risk. Allowance factors established by management are applied to the total balance of loans in each grade to determine the amount needed in the allowance for loan losses. The allowance factors are established based on historical loss ratios experienced by the Company for these loan types, as well as the credit quality criteria underlying each grade, adjusted for trends and expectations about losses inherent in our existing portfolios. In making these adjustments to the allowance factors, management takes into consideration factors which it believes are causing, or are likely in the future to cause, losses within our loan portfolio but which may not be fully reflected in our historical loss ratios. For portfolio balances of consumer, consumer mortgage and certain other similar loan types, allowance factors are determined based on historical loss ratios by portfolio for the preceding eight quarters and may be adjusted by other qualitative criteria.

The loss management committee and the Board of Directors’ problem loan review committee monitor loans that are past due or those that have been downgraded and placed on the Company’s internal watch list due to a decline in the collateral value or cash flow of the debtor; the committees then adjust loan grades accordingly. This information is used to assist management in monitoring credit quality. In addition, the Company’s portfolio management committee monitors and identifies risks within the Company’s loan portfolio by focusing its efforts on reviewing and analyzing loans which are not on the Company’s internal watch list. The portfolio management committee monitors loans in portfolios or regions which management believes could be stressed or experiencing credit deterioration.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for problem loans of $500 or greater by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. For real estate collateral, the fair market value of the collateral is based upon a recent appraisal by a qualified and licensed appraiser of the underlying collateral. When the ultimate collectability of a loan’s principal is in doubt, wholly or partially, the loan is placed on nonaccrual.

After all collection efforts have failed, collateral securing loans may be repossessed and sold or, for loans secured by real estate, foreclosure proceedings are initiated. The collateral is sold at public auction for fair market value (based upon recent appraisals described in the above paragraph), with fees associated with the foreclosure being deducted from the sales price. The purchase price is applied to the outstanding loan balance. If the loan balance is greater than the sales proceeds, the deficient balance is sent to the Board of Directors’ loan committee for charge-off approval. These charge-offs reduce the allowance for loan losses.

Charge-offs reflect the realization of losses in the portfolio that were recognized previously through the provision for loan losses. Net charge-offs for the first quarter 2014 were $1,067 compared to net charge-offs of $892 for the same period 2013. The level of net charge-offs since 2011 are a direct result of the prolonged effects of the economic downturn in our markets on borrowers’ ability to repay their loans coupled with the decline in market values of the underlying collateral securing loans, particularly real estate secured loans. The large inventories of both completed residential homes and land that had been developed for future residential home construction, coupled with declining consumer demand for residential real estate, caused a severe decline in the values of both homes and developed land. As a result, the credit quality of some of our loans in the construction and land development portfolios deteriorated.

The allowance for loan losses is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the entire loan portfolio. The appropriate level of the allowance is based on an ongoing analysis of the loan portfolio and represents an amount that management deems adequate to provide for inherent losses, including collective impairment as recognized under the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic (“ASC”) 450, “Contingencies.” Collective impairment is calculated based on loans grouped by grade. Another component of the allowance is losses on loans assessed as impaired under ASC 310, “Receivables.” The balance of these loans and their related allowance is included in management’s estimation and analysis of the allowance for loan losses. Other considerations in establishing the allowance for loan losses include economic conditions reflected within industry

Table of Contents

segments, the unemployment rate in our markets, loan segmentation and historical losses that are inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is established after input from management, loan review and the loss management committee. An evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is calculated quarterly based on the types of loans, an analysis of credit losses and risk in the portfolio, economic conditions and trends within each of these factors. In addition, on a regular basis, management and the Board of Directors review loan ratios. These ratios include the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans, net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans, the provision for loan losses as a percentage of average loans, nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans and the allowance coverage on nonperforming loans. Also, management reviews past due ratios by officer, community bank and the Company as a whole.

The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan category as of the dates presented:



	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2013
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	3,128	$	3,090	$	2,942
Lease financing	—		—		1
Real estate – construction	1,109		1,091		676
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	18,478		18,629		19,737
Real estate – commercial mortgage	24,147		23,688		22,096
Installment loans to individuals	1,186		1,167		1,053
Total	$	48,048	$	47,665	$	46,505

For impaired loans, specific reserves are established to adjust the carrying value of the loan to its estimated net realizable value. The following table quantifies the amount of the specific reserves component of the allowance for loan losses and the amount of the allowance determined by applying allowance factors to graded loans as of the dates presented:



	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2013
Specific reserves for impaired loans	$	15,262	$	14,650	$	17,534
Allocated reserves for remaining portfolio	32,786		33,015		28,971
Total	$	48,048	$	47,665	$	46,505

The provision for loan losses charged to operating expense is an amount which, in the judgment of management, is necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that is believed to be adequate to meet the inherent risks of losses in our loan portfolio. Factors considered by management in determining the amount of the provision for loan losses include the internal risk rating of individual credits, historical and current trends in net charge-offs, trends in nonperforming loans, trends in past due loans, trends in the market values of underlying collateral securing loans and the current economic conditions in the markets in which we operate. The Company has recorded higher levels of provision for loan losses since 2008 to address credit deterioration resulting from the effects of the economic downturn on our borrowers’ ability to make timely payments or repay their loans at maturity, especially in connection with the construction and land development segment of the loan portfolio. This deterioration was reflected in the increase in nonperforming loans, as well as the decline in market values of underlying collateral securing loans, primarily real estate, which peaked in 2010. In addition, the increase in the provision for loan losses during these periods is attributable to management identifying potential credit deterioration through the internal loan grading system and increasing the allowance for loan losses in response. The Company experienced lower levels of classified loans and nonperforming loans in 2013 and through the first quarter of 2014. In combination with lower levels of classified loans and nonperforming loans, the Company has experienced improving credit quality measures that has resulted in a decrease in the provision for loan losses for the three month period ending March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013. The provision for loan losses was $1,450 and $3,050 for the first quarter of 2014 and 2013, respectively.

All of the loans acquired in the Company’s FDIC-assisted acquisitions and certain loans acquired in the First M&F merger and in previous acquisitions that are accounted for under ASC 310-30, “Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality” (“ASC 310-30”), are carried at values which, in management’s opinion, reflect the estimated future cash flows, based on the facts and circumstances surrounding each respective loan at the date of acquisition. The Company continually monitors these loans as part of our normal credit review and monitoring procedures for changes in the estimated future cash flows; to the extent future cash flows deteriorate below initial projections, the Company may be required to reserve for these loans in the allowance for loan losses through future provision for loan losses. The Company did not increase the allowance for loan losses for loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 during the three months ended March 31, 2014 or 2013. However, the provision for

Table of Contents

loan losses charged to operating expense attributable to loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 totaled $121 during the first quarter 2013 to cover charge-offs of such loans accounted for under ASC 310-30.

The table below reflects the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the periods presented :



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2014			2013
Balance at beginning of period	$	47,665		$	44,347
Charge-offs
Commercial, financial, agricultural	119			234
Lease financing	—			—
Real estate – construction	—			—
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	887			614
Real estate – commercial mortgage	60			593
Installment loans to individuals	231			64
Total charge-offs	1,297			1,505
Recoveries
Commercial, financial, agricultural	37			157
Lease financing	—			—
Real estate – construction	5			16
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	151			339
Real estate – commercial mortgage	30			91
Installment loans to individuals	7			10
Total recoveries	230			613
Net charge-offs	1,067			892
Provision for loan losses	1,450			3,050
Balance at end of period	$	48,048		$	46,505
Net charge-offs (annualized) to average loans	0.11		%	0.13		%
Allowance for loan losses to:
Total loans not covered under loss share agreements	1.30		%	1.79		%
Nonperforming loans not covered under loss share agreements	171.59		%	166.19		%

Table of Contents

The following table provides further details of the Company’s net charge-offs (recoveries) of loans secured by real estate for the periods presented:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2014			2013
Real estate – construction:
Residential	$	(5	)	$	(16	)
Commercial	—			—
Condominiums	—			—
Total real estate – construction	(5		)	(16		)
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage:
Primary	93			126
Home equity	215			240
Rental/investment	150			62
Land development	278			(153		)
Total real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	736			275
Real estate – commercial mortgage:
Owner-occupied	(7		)	58
Non-owner occupied	(20		)	439
Land development	58			5
Total real estate – commercial mortgage	31			502
Total net charge-offs of loans secured by real estate	$	762		$	761

Nonperforming Assets

Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans, other real estate owned and nonaccruing securities available-for-sale. Nonperforming loans are those on which the accrual of interest has stopped or loans which are contractually 90 days past due on which interest continues to accrue. Generally, the accrual of interest is discontinued when the full collection of principal or interest is in doubt or when the payment of principal or interest has been contractually 90 days past due, unless the obligation is both well secured and in the process of collection. Management, the loss management committee and our loan review staff closely monitor loans that are considered to be nonperforming.

Debt securities may be transferred to nonaccrual status where the recognition of investment interest is discontinued. A number of qualitative factors, including but not limited to the financial condition of the underlying issuer and current and projected deferrals or defaults, are considered by management in the determination of whether a debt security should be transferred to nonaccrual status. The interest on these nonaccrual investment securities is accounted for on the cash-basis method until qualifying for return to accrual status. Nonaccruing securities available-for-sale consist of the Company’s investments in pooled trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions, each of which is on nonaccrual status.

Table of Contents

The following table provides details of the Company’s nonperforming assets that are not acquired and not covered by FDIC loss-share agreements, nonperforming assets that have been acquired and are covered by loss-share agreements with the FDIC (“covered assets”), and nonperforming assets acquired through the First M&F merger and not covered by loss-share agreements with the FDIC as of the dates presented (“acquired M&F”):



	Not Acquired		Acquired and Covered Under Loss Share		Acquired M&F		Total
March 31, 2014
Nonaccruing loans	$	18,365	$	46,078	$	6,393	$	70,836
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more	1,322		32		1,922		3,276
Total nonperforming loans	19,687		46,110		8,315		74,112
Other real estate owned	25,117		10,218		12,406		47,741
Total nonperforming loans and OREO	44,804		56,328		20,721		121,853
Nonaccruing securities available-for-sale, at fair value	19,378		—		—		19,378
Total nonperforming assets	$	64,182	$	56,328	$	20,721	$	141,231
Nonperforming loans to total loans							1.92		%
Nonperforming assets to total assets							2.39		%

December 31, 2013
Nonaccruing loans	$	16,863	$	49,194	$	6,274	$	72,331
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more	2,287		—		1,899		4,186
Total nonperforming loans	19,150		49,194		8,173		76,517
Other real estate owned	27,543		12,942		12,402		52,887
Total nonperforming loans and OREO	46,693		62,136		20,575		129,404
Nonaccruing securities available-for-sale, at fair value	17,671		—		—		17,671
Total nonperforming assets	$	64,364	$	62,136	$	20,575	$	147,075
Nonperforming loans to total loans							1.97		%
Nonperforming assets to total assets							2.56		%

Due to the significant difference in the accounting for the loans and other real estate owned covered by loss-share agreements and loss mitigation offered under the loss-share agreements with the FDIC, the Company believes that excluding the covered assets from its asset quality measures provides a more meaningful presentation of the Company’s asset quality. The asset quality measures surrounding the Company’s nonperforming assets discussed in the remainder of this section exclude covered assets relating to the Company’s FDIC-assisted acquisitions.

Another category of assets which contribute to our credit risk is restructured loans. Restructured loans are those for which concessions have been granted to the borrower due to a deterioration of the borrower’s financial condition and are performing in accordance with the new terms. Such concessions may include reduction in interest rates or deferral of interest or principal payments. In evaluating whether to restructure a loan, management analyzes the long-term financial condition of the borrower, including guarantor and collateral support, to determine whether the proposed concessions will increase the likelihood of repayment of principal and interest. Restructured loans that are not performing in accordance with their restructured terms that are either contractually 90 days past due or placed on nonaccrual status are reported as nonperforming loans.

Table of Contents

The following table shows the principal amounts of nonperforming and restructured loans as of the dates presented. All loans where information exists about possible credit problems that would cause us to have serious doubts about the borrower’s ability to comply with the current repayment terms of the loan have been reflected in the table below.



	March 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2013
Nonaccruing loans	$	24,758		$	23,137		$	25,382
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more	3,244			4,187			2,601
Total nonperforming loans	28,002			27,324			27,983
Restructured loans in compliance with modified terms	19,802			21,478			30,387
Total nonperforming and restructured loans	$	47,804		$	48,802		$	58,370

Nonperforming loans to loans	0.72		%	0.74		%	1.08		%

The acquisition of First M&F increased nonperforming loans $8,315 at March 31, 2014 which consisted of $6,393 in loans of nonaccrual status and $1,922 in accruing loans past due 90 days or more. Excluding the nonperforming loans from the First M&F merger, nonperforming loans were $65,797 at March 31, 2014, a decrease of $10,158, or 13.37%, from March 31, 2013. The following table presents nonperforming loans, not subject to a loss-share agreement, by loan category as of the dates presented:



	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2013
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	1,264	$	1,524	$	1,553
Real estate – construction:
Residential	—		—		—
Commercial	—		—		—
Condominiums	—		—		—
Total real estate – construction	—		—		—
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage:
Primary	3,844		4,323		6,254
Home equity	868		916		811
Rental/investment	1,597		1,972		3,530
Land development	2,876		2,969		3,906
Total real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	9,185		10,180		14,501
Real estate – commercial mortgage:
Owner-occupied	3,430		1,306		2,458
Non-owner occupied	12,987		13,288		7,411
Land development	903		850		1,771
Total real estate – commercial mortgage	17,320		15,444		11,640
Installment loans to individuals	233		176		289
Total nonperforming loans	$	28,002	$	27,324	$	27,983

Total nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans were 0.72% as of March 31, 2014 compared to 0.74% as of December 31, 2013 and 1.08% as of March 31, 2013. The Company’s coverage ratio, or its allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans, was 171.59% as of March 31, 2014 as compared to 174.44% as of December 31, 2013 and 166.19% as of March 31, 2013.

Management has evaluated the aforementioned loans and other loans classified as nonperforming and believes that all nonperforming loans have been adequately reserved for in the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2014. Management also continually monitors past due loans for potential credit quality deterioration. Total loans 30-89 days past due were $21,792 at March 31, 2014 as compared to $21,159 at December 31, 2013 and $8,302 at March 31, 2013. The acquisition of First M&F contributed $13,550 to loans 30-89 days past due at March 31, 2014, an increase of $1,381 from December 31, 2013.

Table of Contents

As shown above, restructured loans totaled $19,802 at March 31, 2014 compared to $21,478 at December 31, 2013 and $30,387 at March 31, 2013. At March 31, 2014, loans restructured through interest rate concessions represented 72% of total restructured loans, while loans restructured by a concession in payment terms represented the remainder. The following table provides further details of the Company’s restructured loans in compliance with their modified terms as of the dates presented:



	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2013
Commercial, financial, agricultural	$	—	$	19	$	—
Real estate – construction:
Residential	—		—		—
Commercial	—		—		—
Condominiums	—		—		—
Total real estate – construction	—		—		—
Real estate – 1-4 family mortgage:
Primary	1,914		2,063		1,459
Home equity	—		—		—
Rental/investment	1,809		1,821		2,379
Land development	5,338		6,470		7,272
Total real estate – 1-4 family mortgage	9,061		10,354		11,110
Real estate – commercial mortgage:
Owner-occupied	3,564		3,702		11,327
Non-owner occupied	5,300		5,343		6,896
Land development	1,877		1,889		881
Total real estate – commercial mortgage	10,741		10,934		19,104
Installment loans to individuals	—		171		173
Total restructured loans in compliance with modified terms	$	19,802	$	21,478	$	30,387

Changes in the Company’s restructured loans are set forth in the table below:



	2014			2013
Balance at January 1	$	21,478		$	29,436
Additional loans with concessions	—			4,336
Reductions due to:
Reclassified as nonperforming	(331		)	(3,227		)
Paid in full	(190		)	—
Charge-offs	—			(1,301		)
Transfer to other real estate owned	—			—
Paydowns	(1,155		)	(2,025		)
Lapse of concession period	—			(5,741		)
Balance at March 31	$	19,802		$	21,478

Other real estate owned consists of properties acquired through foreclosure or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. These properties are carried at the lower of cost or fair market value based on appraised value less estimated selling costs. Losses arising at the time of foreclosure of properties are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Reductions in the carrying value subsequent to acquisition are charged to earnings and are included in “Other real estate owned” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Other real estate owned with a cost basis of $3,340 was sold during the three months ended March 31, 2014, resulting in a net loss of $99, while other real estate owned with a cost basis of $6,263 was sold during the three months ended March 31, 2013, resulting in a net loss of $481.

Table of Contents

The following table provides details of the Company’s other real estate owned as of the dates presented:



	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2013
Residential real estate	$	6,466	$	6,767	$	5,559
Commercial real estate	8,514		8,984		7,288
Residential land development	10,418		12,334		20,428
Commercial land development	12,124		11,860		6,126
Other	—		—		385
Total other real estate owned	$	37,522	$	39,945	$	39,786

Changes in the Company’s other real estate owned were as follows:



	2014			2013
Balance at January 1	$	39,945		$	44,717
Acquired from First M&F	—			13,527
Additions	1,554			11,164
Capitalized improvements	—			—
Impairments	(528		)	(1,434		)
Dispositions	(3,340		)	(28,027		)
Other	(109		)	(2		)
Balance at March 31	$	37,522		$	39,945

Interest Rate Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. The majority of assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature and therefore differ greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets and inventories. Our market risk arises primarily from interest rate risk inherent in lending and deposit-taking activities. Management believes a significant impact on the Company’s financial results stems from our ability to react to changes in interest rates. To that end, management actively monitors and manages our interest rate risk exposure.

We have an Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) which is authorized by the Board of Directors to monitor our interest rate sensitivity and to make decisions relating to that process. The ALCO’s goal is to structure our asset/liability composition to maximize net interest income while managing interest rate risk so as to minimize the adverse impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income and capital. Profitability is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A sudden and substantial change in interest rates may adversely impact our earnings because the interest rates borne by assets and liabilities do not change at the same speed, to the same extent or on the same basis.

We monitor the impact of changes in interest rates on our net interest income and economic value of equity (“EVE”) using rate shock analysis. Net interest income simulations measure the short-term earnings exposure from changes in market rates of interest in a rigorous and explicit fashion. Our current financial position is combined with assumptions regarding future business to calculate net interest income under varying hypothetical rate scenarios. EVE measures our long-term earnings exposure from changes in market rates of interest. EVE is defined as the present value of assets minus the present value of liabilities at a point in time. A decrease in EVE due to a specified rate change indicates a decline in the long-term earnings capacity of the balance sheet assuming that the rate change remains in effect over the life of the current balance sheet.

The following rate shock analysis depicts the estimated impact on net interest income and EVE of immediate changes in interest rates at the specified levels for the dates presented:

Table of Contents



	Percentage Change In:
	Net Interest Income⁽²⁾				Economic Value of Equity ⁽³⁾
Change in Interest Rates⁽¹⁾ (In Basis Points)	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
+400	0.51	%	1.31	%	16.69	%	16.85	%
+300	0.44	%	0.94	%	14.85	%	15.06	%
+200	0.20	%	0.41	%	12.50	%	12.76	%
+100	(0.06	)%	0.08	%	9.91	%	10.21	%
-100	(2.01	)%	(2.33	)%	(3.78	)%	(4.61	)%


(1)	On account of the present position of the target federal funds rate, the Company did not perform an analysis assuming a downward movement in rates of more than 100 bps.


(2)	The percentage change in this column represents the projected net interest income for 12 months on a flat balance sheet in a stable interest rate environment versus the projected net interest income in the various rate scenarios.


(3)	The percentage change in this column represents our EVE in a stable interest rate environment versus EVE in the various rate scenarios.

The rate shock results for the net interest income simulation is less asset sensitive at March 31, 2014, as compared to December 31, 2013. This shift is due to our improved liability mix as higher cost fixed-rate borrowings and time deposits were replaced with variable, but much lower rate deposits. Additionally, on the asset side, lower-yielding investments within the securities portfolio and overnight investments in interest-bearing balances with banks were shifted to the higher-yielding, longer-term loan portfolio. The EVE results are slightly more asset sensitive reflecting the increased value of the non-time deposits whose rates have declined versus the prior year.

The preceding measures assume no change in the size or asset/liability compositions of the balance sheet. Thus, the measures do not reflect actions the ALCO may undertake in response to such changes in interest rates. The above results of the interest rate shock analysis are within the parameters set by the Board of Directors. The scenarios assume instantaneous movements in interest rates in increments of 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points. With the present position of the target federal funds rate, the declining rate scenario seems improbable. Furthermore, it has been the Federal Reserve’s policy to adjust the target federal funds rate incrementally over time. As interest rates are adjusted over a period of time, it is our strategy to proactively change the volume and mix of our balance sheet in order to mitigate our interest rate risk. The computation of the prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes requires numerous assumptions regarding characteristics of new business and the behavior of existing positions. These business assumptions are based upon our experience, business plans and published industry experience. Key assumptions employed in the model include asset prepayment speeds, competitive factors, the relative price sensitivity of certain assets and liabilities and the expected life of non-maturity deposits. Because these assumptions are inherently uncertain, actual results will differ from simulated results.

The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments, including interest rate contracts such as swaps, caps and/or floors, as part of its ongoing efforts to mitigate its interest rate risk exposure and to facilitate the needs of its customers. The Company also enters into derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments to help its commercial customers manage their exposure to interest rate fluctuations. To mitigate the interest rate risk associated with these customer contracts, the Company enters into an offsetting derivative contract position. The Company manages its credit risk, or potential risk of default by its commercial customers, through credit limit approval and monitoring procedures. At March 31, 2014, the Company had notional amounts of $73,950 on interest rate contracts with corporate customers and $73,950 in offsetting interest rate contracts with other financial institutions to mitigate the Company’s rate exposure on its corporate customers’ contracts and certain fixed-rate loans.

In March and April 2012, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements effective March 30, 2014 and March 17, 2014, respectively. Beginning on the respective effective date, the Company receives a variable rate of interest based on the three-month LIBOR plus a pre-determined spread and pays a fixed rate of interest. The agreements, which both terminate in March 2022, are accounted for as cash flow hedges to reduce the variability in cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $32,000 of the Company’s junior subordinated debentures. In connection with its acquisition of First M&F, the Company assumed an interest rate swap designed to convert floating rate interest payments into fixed rate payments. Based on the terms of the agreement, which terminates in March 2018, the Company receives a variable rate of interest based on the three-month LIBOR plus a pre-determined spread and pays a fixed rate of interest. The interest rate swap is accounted for as a cash flow hedge to reduce the variability in cash flows resulting from changes in interest rates on $30,000 of the junior subordinated debentures assumed in the merger with First M&F.

Table of Contents

The Company also enters into interest rate lock commitments with its customers to mitigate the Company’s interest rate risk associated with its commitments to fund fixed-rate residential mortgage loans. Under the interest rate lock commitments, interest rates for a mortgage loan are locked in with the customer for a period of time, typically thirty days. Once an interest rate lock commitment is entered into with a customer, the Company also enters into a forward commitment to sell the residential mortgage loan to secondary market investors. Accordingly, the Company does not incur risk if the interest rate lock commitment in the pipeline fails to close.

For more information about the Company’s derivative financial instruments, see Note J, “Derivative Instruments,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company in Item 1, “Financial Statements,” in this report.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity management is the ability to meet the cash flow requirements of customers who may be either depositors wishing to withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs.

Core deposits, which are deposits excluding time deposits and public fund deposits, are a major source of funds used by Renasant Bank to meet cash flow needs. Maintaining the ability to acquire these funds as needed in a variety of markets is the key to assuring Renasant Bank’s liquidity. Management continually monitors the liquidity through review of a variety of reports.

Our investment portfolio is another alternative for meeting liquidity needs. These assets generally have readily available markets that offer conversions to cash as needed. Within the next twelve months the securities portfolio is forecasted to generate cash flow through principal payments and maturities equal to 16.3% of the carrying value of the total securities portfolio. Securities within our investment portfolio are also used to secure certain deposit types and short-term borrowings. At March 31, 2014, securities with a carrying value of $747,611 were pledged to secure public fund deposits and as collateral for short-term borrowings and derivative instruments as compared to securities with a carrying value of $608,401 similarly pledged at December 31, 2013.

Other sources available for meeting liquidity needs include federal funds purchased and advances from the FHLB. Interest is charged at the prevailing market rate on federal funds purchased and FHLB advances. There were no outstanding federal funds purchased at March 31, 2014 and $222 of federal funds purchased at December 31, 2013. Funds obtained from the FHLB are used primarily to match-fund fixed rate loans in order to minimize interest rate risk and also be used to meet day to day liquidity needs, particularly when the cost of such borrowing compares favorably to the rates that we would be required to pay to attract deposits. At March 31, 2014, the balance of our outstanding advances with the FHLB was $74,416. The total amount of the remaining credit available to us from the FHLB at March 31, 2014 was $1,609,519. We also maintain lines of credit with other commercial banks totaling $75,000. These are unsecured lines of credit maturing at various times within the next twelve months. There were no amounts outstanding under these lines of credit at March 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013.



	Percentage of Total				Cost of Funds
	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended
	March 31,				March 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Noninterest-bearing demand	18.28	%	15.03	%	—	%	—	%
Interest-bearing demand	43.18		40.81		0.21		0.25
Savings	6.48		6.75		0.09		0.20
Time deposits	28.78		32.93		0.86		1.02
FHLB advances	1.44		2.26		4.19		4.25
Other borrowed funds	1.84		2.22		4.47		3.08
	100.00	%	100.00	%	0.48	%	0.62	%

Table of Contents

Our strategy in choosing funds is focused on minimizing cost along with considering our balance sheet composition and interest rate risk position. Accordingly, management targets growth of non-interest bearing deposits. While we do not control the types of deposit instruments our clients choose, we do influence those choices with the rates and the deposit specials we offer. We constantly monitor our funds position and evaluate the effect that various funding sources have on our financial position. Our cost of funds decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013 as management improved our funding mix using non-interest bearing or lower costing deposits and repaying higher costing funding including time deposits and borrowed funds.

Cash and cash equivalents were $301,615 at March 31, 2014 compared to $190,028 at March 31, 2013. Cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $120,262 compared to $73,163 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Proceeds from the sale, maturity or call of securities within our investment portfolio were $74,959 for the first three months of 2014. These proceeds from the investment portfolio were primarily reinvested back into the security portfolio or used to fund loan growth. Proceeds from the sale, maturity, or call of securities within our investment portfolio during the first three months of 2013 were $63,489. These proceeds were primarily reinvested in the securities portfolio. Purchases of investment securities were $204,966 for the first three months of 2014 compared to $130,707 for the same period in 2013.

Cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $154,969 compared to cash provided by financing activities of $89,431 for the same period in 2013. Deposits increased $162,872 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to an increase of $93,954 for the same period in 2013.

Restrictions on Bank Dividends, Loans and Advances

The Company’s liquidity and capital resources, as well as its ability to pay dividends to our shareholders, are substantially dependent on the ability of Renasant Bank to transfer funds to the Company in the form of dividends, loans and advances. Under Mississippi law, a Mississippi bank may not pay dividends unless its earned surplus is in excess of three times capital stock. A Mississippi bank with earned surplus in excess of three times capital stock may pay a dividend, subject to the approval of the Mississippi Department of Banking and Consumer Finance. Accordingly, the approval of this supervisory authority is required prior to Renasant Bank paying dividends to the Company.

Federal Reserve regulations also limit the amount Renasant Bank may loan to the Company unless such loans are collateralized by specific obligations. At March 31, 2014, the maximum amount available for transfer from Renasant Bank to the Company in the form of loans was $51,599. The Company maintains a line of credit collateralized by cash with Renasant Bank totaling $3,000. There were no amounts outstanding under this line of credit at March 31, 2014. These restrictions did not have any impact on the Company’s ability to meet its cash obligations in the first three months of 2014, nor does management expect such restrictions to materially impact the Company’s ability to meet its currently-anticipated cash obligations.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

The Company enters into loan commitments and standby letters of credit in the normal course of its business. Loan commitments are made to accommodate the financial needs of the Company’s customers. Standby letters of credit commit the Company to make payments on behalf of customers when certain specified future events occur. Both arrangements have essentially the same credit risk as that involved in extending loans to customers and are subject to the Company’s normal credit policies. Collateral (e.g., securities, receivables, inventory, equipment, etc.) is obtained based on management’s credit assessment of the customer.

Loan commitments and standby letters of credit do not necessarily represent future cash requirements of the Company in that while the borrower has the ability to draw upon these commitments at any time, these commitments often expire without being drawn upon. The Company’s unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit outstanding were as follows for the periods presented:



	March 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Loan commitments	$	631,309	$	630,266
Standby letters of credit	29,264		30,062

The Company closely monitors the amount of remaining future commitments to borrowers in light of prevailing economic conditions and adjusts these commitments as necessary. The Company will continue this process as new commitments are entered into or existing commitments are renewed.

Shareholders’ Equity and Regulatory Matters

Table of Contents

Total shareholders’ equity of the Company was $676,715 at March 31, 2014 compared to $665,652 at December 31, 2013. The acquisition of M&F contributed $155,524 to the Company's equity position at December 31, 2013. Book value per share was $21.50 and $21.21 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The growth in shareholders’ equity was attributable to the acquisition of First M&F along with earnings retention offset by dividends declared and changes in accumulated other comprehensive income.

On September 5, 2012, the Company filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The shelf registration statement, which the SEC declared effective on September 17, 2012, allows the Company to raise capital from time to time, up to an aggregate of $150,000, through the sale of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and units, or a combination thereof, subject to market conditions. Specific terms and prices will be determined at the time of any offering under a separate prospectus supplement that the Company will be required to file with the SEC at the time of the specific offering. The proceeds of the sale of securities, if and when offered, will be used for general corporate purposes as described in any prospectus supplement and could include the expansion of the Company’s banking, insurance and wealth management operations as well as other business opportunities.

The Company has junior subordinated debentures with a carrying value of $94,284 at March 31, 2014, of which $91,096 are included in the Company’s Tier 1 capital. The Federal Reserve Board issued guidance in March 2005 providing more strict quantitative limits on the amount of securities that, similar to our junior subordinated debentures, are includable in Tier 1 capital. The new guidance, which became effective in March 2009, did not impact the amount of debentures we include in Tier 1 capital. In addition, although our existing junior subordinated debentures are unaffected, on account of changes enacted as part of the Dodd-Frank Act, any trust preferred securities issued after May 19, 2010 may not be included in Tier 1 capital.

The Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency have issued guidelines governing the levels of capital that banks must maintain. Those guidelines specify capital tiers, which include the following classifications:



Capital Tiers	Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets (Leverage)	Tier 1 Capital to Risk – Weighted Assets	Total Capital to Risk – Weighted Assets
Well capitalized	5% or above	6% or above	10% or above
Adequately capitalized	4% or above	4% or above	8% or above
Undercapitalized	Less than 4%	Less than 4%	Less than 8%
Significantly undercapitalized	Less than 3%	Less than 3%	Less than 6%
Critically undercapitalized		2% or less

Table of Contents

The following table provides the capital and risk-based capital and leverage ratios for the Company and for Renasant Bank as of the dates presented:



	Actual				Minimum Capital Requirement to be Well Capitalized				Minimum Capital Requirement to be Adequately Capitalized
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
March 31, 2014
Renasant Corporation:
Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets	$	483,738	8.56	%	$	282,454	5.00	%	$	225,963	4.00	%
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	483,738		11.54	%	251,510		6.00	%	167,674		4.00	%
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	532,549		12.70	%	419,184		10.00	%	335,347		8.00	%
Renasant Bank:
Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets	$	467,944	8.30	%	$	281,839	5.00	%	$	225,471	4.00	%
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	467,944		11.24	%	249,881		6.00	%	166,587		4.00	%
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	515,993		12.39	%	416,468		10.00	%	333,174		8.00	%
December 31, 2013
Renasant Corporation:
Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets	$	473,817	8.68	%	$	196,871	5.00	%	$	157,497	4.00	%
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	473,817		11.41	%	182,964		6.00	%	121,976		4.00	%
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	522,181		12.58	%	304,940		10.00	%	243,952		8.00	%

Renasant Bank:
Tier 1 Capital to Average Assets	$	457,798	8.40	%	$	196,192	5.00	%	$	156,954	4.00	%
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	457,798		11.05	%	182,580		6.00	%	121,720		4.00	%
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets	505,463		12.20	%	304,300		10.00	%	243,440		8.00	%

In July 2013, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency approved the implementation of the Basel III regulatory capital reforms and issued rules effecting certain changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act (the “Basel III Rules”) that call for broad and comprehensive revision of regulatory capital standards for U.S. banking organizations. The Basel III Rules will implement a new common equity Tier 1 minimum capital requirement, a higher minimum Tier 1 capital requirement and other items that will affect the calculation of the numerator of a banking organization’s risk-based capital ratios. Additionally, the Basel III Rules apply limits to a banking organization’s capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the banking organization does not hold a specified amount of common equity Tier 1 capital in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements.

The new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio includes common equity as defined under GAAP and does not include any other type of non-common equity under GAAP. When the Basel III Rules are fully phased in in 2019, banks will be required to have common equity Tier 1 capital of 4.5% of average assets, Tier 1 capital of 6% of average assets, as compared to the current 4%, and total capital of 8% of risk-weighted assets to be categorized as adequately capitalized. The Basel III Rules require the phase-out of trust preferred securities as Tier 1 capital of bank holding companies of the Company’s size in equal installments over a defined period.

Further, the Basel III Rules changed the agencies’ general risk-based capital requirements for determining risk-weighted assets, which will affect the calculation of the denominator of a banking organization’s risk-based capital ratios. The Basel III Rules have revised the agencies’ rules for calculating risk-weighted assets to enhance risk sensitivity and will incorporate certain international capital standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision set forth in the standardized approach of the “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework”.

Table of Contents

The calculation of risk-weighted assets in the denominator of the Basel III capital ratios would be adjusted to reflect the higher risk nature of certain types of loans. Specifically, as applicable to the Company and Renasant Bank:



—	Residential mortgages: Replaces the current 50% risk weight for performing residential first-lien mortgages and a 100% risk-weight for all other mortgages with a risk weight of between 35% and 200% determined by the mortgage’s loan-to-value ratio and whether the mortgage falls into one of two categories based on eight criteria that include the term, use of negative amortization and balloon payments, certain rate increases and documented and verified borrower income.
—	Commercial mortgages: Replaces the current 100% risk weight with a 150% risk weight for certain high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development and construction loans.
—	Nonperforming loans: Replaces the current 100% risk weight with a 150% risk weight for loans, other than residential mortgages, that are 90 days past due or on nonaccrual status.

Generally, the new Basel III Rules become effective on January 1, 2015, although parts of the Basel III Rules will be phased in through 2019. Management is reviewing the new rules to assess their impact on the Company.

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes in our market risk since December 31, 2013. For additional information regarding our market risk, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) are effective for ensuring that information the Company is required to disclose in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Information regarding risk factors appears in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. There have been no material changes in the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company did not repurchase any shares of its outstanding stock during the three month period ended March 31, 2014.

Please refer to the information discussing restrictions on the Company’s ability to pay dividends under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” of this report, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 6. EXHIBITS



Exhibit Number		Description

(2)(i)		Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Renasant Corporation, Renasant Bank, First M&F Corporation and Merchants and Farmers Bank dated as of February 6, 2013(1)

(3)(i)		Articles of Incorporation of Renasant Corporation, as amended(2)

(3)(ii)		Restated Bylaws of Renasant Corporation (3)

(4)(i)		Articles of Incorporation of Renasant Corporation, as amended(2)

(4)(ii)		Restated Bylaws of Renasant Corporation (3)

(31)(i)		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, as required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(31)(ii)		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, as required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(32)(i)		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, as required pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(32)(ii)		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, as required pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(101)		The following materials from Renasant Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 were formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).


(1)	Filed as exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.


(2)	Filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.


(3)	Filed as exhibit 3(ii) to the Company's Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference.

Table of Contents

The Company does not have any long-term debt instruments under which securities are authorized exceeding ten percent of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Company will furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon its request, a copy of all long-term debt instruments.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		RENASANT CORPORATION
		(Registrant)

Date:	May 9, 2014	/s/ E. Robinson McGraw
		E. Robinson McGraw
		Chairman of the Board, Director,
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date:	May 9, 2014	/s/ Kevin D. Chapman
		Kevin D. Chapman
		Executive Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit Number		Description

(31)(i)		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, as required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(31)(ii)		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, as required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(32)(i)		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, as required pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(32)(ii)		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, as required pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(101)		The following materials from Renasant Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 were formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

Renasant Corp - 10-Q quarterly report FY

What is the market capitalization of a company?

DISCLAIMER

Contact

Links



		Page
PART I	Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
	Consolidated Statements of Income	2
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	4
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	41

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	64

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	64

PART II	Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	65

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	65

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	65

Item 6.	Exhibits	65

SIGNATURES		67

EXHIBIT INDEX		68