UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[Ö ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended ........................................ December 31, 2003
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________________ to _________________
Commission File Number 000-28304
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
3756 Central Avenue, Riverside, California 92506(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(909) 686-6060(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
.(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes Ö . No .
Indicate by check whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Title of class: As of February 2, 2004
Common stock, $ 0.01 par value, per share 7,229,138 shares*
* Includes 441,286 shares held by the employee stock ownership plan ("ESOP") that have not been released, committed to be released, or allocated to participant accounts; and 36,526 shares held by the management recognition plan ("MRP") that have been committed to be released and allocated to participant accounts. On December 19, 2003, the Corporation declared a 3-for-2 stock split distributed in the form of a 50 percent stock dividend on February 2, 2004 to shareholders of record on January 15, 2004. All share and per share information in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related discussion have been restated to reflect the stock split.
<PAGE>
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.
Table of Contents
PART 1 -
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1 -
Financial Statements. The Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. filed as a part of the report are as follows:
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
as of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003
1
Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the quarters and six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
2
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
5
Selected Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
6
ITEM 2 -
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations:
General
12
Critical Accounting Policies
13
Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003
14
Comparison of Operating Results
15
Asset Quality
24
Loan Volume Activities
26
Liquidity and Capital Resources
27
Commitments and Derivative Financial Instruments
28
Stockholders' Equity
29
Stock Option Plan and Management Recognition Plan
Supplemental Information
30
ITEM 3 -
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
ITEM 4 -
Controls and Procedures
31
PART II -
OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings
32
Changes in Securities
Defaults upon Senior Securities
Submission of Matters to Vote of Shareholders
ITEM 5 -
Other Information
33
ITEM 6 -
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
34
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition(Unaudited)Dollars In Thousands
December 31,
June 30,
2003
Assets
Cash
$ 24,427
$ 48,851
Investment securities - held to maturity, at amortized
cost (fair value $76,340 and $77,210, respectively)
76,397
76,838
Investment securities - available for sale at fair value
214,708
220,273
Loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan
losses of $7,480 and $7,218, respectively
870,088
744,219
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
4,909
4,247
Receivable from sale of loans
52,526
114,902
Accrued interest receivable
4,750
4,934
Real estate held for investment, net
10,373
10,643
Other real estate owned, net
-
523
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
24,484
20,974
Premises and equipment, net
8,107
8,045
Prepaid expenses and other assets
6,827
7,057
Total assets
$ 1,297,596
$1,261,506
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Liabilities:
Non interest-bearing deposits
$ 45,756
$ 43,840
Interest-bearing deposits
764,283
710,266
Total deposits
810,039
754,106
Borrowings
356,892
367,938
Accounts payable, accrued interest and other liabilities
25,516
32,584
Total liabilities
1,192,447
1,154,628
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Additional paid-in capital
56,392
54,691
Retained earnings
103,649
98,660
Treasury stock at cost (4,665,177 and 4,290,219 shares, respectively)
(53,358
)
(45,801
Unearned stock compensation
(2,180
(2,450
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax
527
1,660
Total stockholders' equity
105,149
106,878
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$ 1,261,506
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.Consolidated Statements of Operations(Unaudited)In Thousands, Except Earnings Per Share
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity(Unaudited)Dollars In Thousands, Except SharesFor the Quarters Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
CommonStock
AdditionalPaid-In
Retained
Treasury
Unearned Stock
AccumulatedOtherComprehensive
Shares
Amount
Capital
Earnings
Stock
Compensation
Income, net of tax
Total
Balance at September 30, 2003
7,157,195
$ 119
$55,585
$101,761
$(53,294
$ (2,315
$ 582
$ 102,438
Comprehensive income:
Net income
3,091
Unrealized holding loss on securities available for sale, net of tax
(55
Total comprehensive income
3,036
Purchase of treasury stock
(3,057
(64
Exercise of stock options
72,750
538
Amortization of MRP
Tax benefit from non-qualified
equity compensation
Allocations of contribution to ESOP
266
68
334
Prepayment of ESOP loan
Cash dividends
(477
Dividends declared, not yet paid
(726
Balance at December 31, 2003
7,226,888
$ 56,392
$103,649
$(53,358
$ ( 2,180
$ 527
$ 105,149
Balance at September 30, 2002
7,831,478
$ 117
$ 52,312
$ 86,226
$(35,816
$ (2,861
$ 1,077
$ 101,055
3,889
Unrealized holding gain on securities available for sale, net of tax
279
4,168
(302,832
(5,299
25,313
204
89
200
67
267
19
(260
Balance at December 31, 2002
7,553,959
$ 52,716
$ 89,855
$(41,115
$ ( 2,686
$ 1,356
$ 100,243
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity(Unaudited)Dollars In Thousands, Except SharesFor the Six Months Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
Balance at June 30, 2003
7,479,671
$ 118
$ 54,691
$ 98,660
$(45,801
$ (2,450
$ 1,660
$ 106,878
6,672
(1,133
5,539
(374,958
(7,557
122,175
982
983
214
505
136
641
66
(957
Balance at June 30, 2002
8,194,691
$ 52,138
$ 82,805
$(30,027
$ (2,866
$ 864
$ 103,031
7,583
492
8,075
(684,882
(11,345
Amortization and grants of MRP
18,837
257
8
265
374
134
508
Prepayment of ESOP loans
38
(533
4
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows(Unaudited)Dollars In Thousands
Six Months EndedDecember 31,
2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
$ 6,672
$ 7,583
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
2,312
2,576
Provision for loan losses
269
765
Gain on sale of loans
(5,893
(9,019
Gain on sale on investment securities
(266
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities
(6,799
1,408
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expense and other assets
414
(552
Loans originated for sale
(535,207
(577,939
Proceeds from sale of loans
602,814
548,045
Stock based compensation
775
811
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities
65,357
(26,588
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net increase in loans held for investment
(125,734
(82,388
Maturity and call of investment securities held to maturity
49,700
156,754
Maturity and call of investment securities available for sale
29,525
30,595
Principal payments from mortgage backed securities
57,169
23,051
Purchase of investment securities held to maturity
(49,388
(117,442
Purchase of investment securities available for sale
(84,756
(138,929
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale
10,237
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
(3,510
(5,137
Net sales of other real estate owned
513
450
Net purchases of premises and equipment
(656
(596
Net cash used for investing activities
(127,137
(123,405
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits
55,933
33,558
Proceeds from (repayment of) Federal Home Loan Bank advances, net
(11,046
134,486
Treasury stock purchases
Net cash provided by financing activities
37,356
156,370
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(24,424
6,377
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
48,851
27,700
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$ 34,077
Supplemental information:
Cash paid for interest
$ 12,853
$ 15,410
Cash paid for income taxes
4,460
4,960
726
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans
649
PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.SELECTED NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2003
Note 1: Basis of PresentationThe unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The balance sheet data at June 30, 2003 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (the "Corporation"). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to interim financial reporting. It is suggested that these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003 (SEC File No. 000-28304). On December 19, 2003 the Corporation declared a 3-for-2 stock split, distributed in the form of a 50 percent stock dividend on February 2, 2004 to shareholders of record on January 15, 2004. All share and per share information in the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been restated to reflect the stock split. Certain amounts in the prior periods' financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation. The results of operations for the interim periods are not indicative of results for the full year.Note 2: Earnings Per Share and Stock-Based CompensationEarnings Per Share:Basic earnings per share ("EPS") excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that would then share in the earnings of the entity. The following table provides the basic and diluted EPS computations for the quarters and six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation:Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. The Corporation has been accounting for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the Corporation's stock at the date of grant over the grant (exercise) price.The Corporation has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123. Had compensation cost for the Corporation's stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Corporation's net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts as follows (dollars in thousands, except earnings per share):
7
Note 3: Operating Segment ReportsThe Corporation operates in two business segments: community banking (Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. ("Bank") and mortgage banking (Provident Bank Mortgage ("PBM")), a division of the Bank. The following tables set forth condensed income statements and total assets for the Corporation's operating segments for the quarters and six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively (in thousands).
(1) Includes an inter-company charge of $1.37 million credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for originating loans held for investment, as well as an inter-company charge of $108,000 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for servicing fees on loans sold on a servicing retained basis.
(1) Includes an inter-company charge of $862,000 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for originating loans held for investment, as well as an inter-company charge of $1,000 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for servicing fees on loans sold on a servicing retained basis.
(1) Includes an inter-company charge of $2.62 million credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for originating loans held for investment, as well as an inter-company charge of $264,000 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for servicing fees on loans sold on a servicing retained basis.
(1) Includes an inter-company charge of $2.04 million credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for originating loans held for investment, as well as an inter-company charge of $1,000 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for servicing fees on loans sold on a servicing basis.
9
Note 4: Commitments and Derivative Financial InstrumentsThe Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, in the form of originating loans or providing funds under existing lines of credit, forward loan sale agreements to third parties, and commitments to purchase investment securities. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition. The Corporation's exposure to credit loss, in the event of non-performance by the counterparty to these financial instruments, is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments to extend credit as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
In accordance with SFAS No. 133 and interpretations of the Derivative Implementation Group of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), the fair value of the commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale, forward loan sale agreements and put option contracts are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet, and are included in other assets or other liabilities. The Corporation is not applying hedge accounting to its derivative financial instruments; therefore, all changes in fair value are recorded in earnings. The net impact of derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations during the quarters ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 was a loss of $244,000 and a loss of $248,000, respectively.
(1) Net of an estimated 25.6% of commitments at December 31, 2003, 29.5% of commitments at June 30, 2003 and 30.0% of commitments at December 31, 2002, which may not fund. The fair value of servicing released premiums at December 31, 2003, June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 were $326,000, $1.81 million and $916,000, respectively. The Securities and Exchange Commission staff recently expressed their view that loan commitments that are recognized as derivatives pursuant to SFAS No. 133 are written options, which by definition should be recorded as liabilities. The staff further indicated that they expected the practice of recognizing assets, and no liabilities, to be discontinued, and would not object if registrants discontinued this practice beginning in the first reporting period beginning after March 15, 2004. The Corporation's practice has been to recognize, at the initiation of the rate lock, the anticipated servicing released premium on the underlying loans. Consequently, the SEC guidance will delay that recognition until the loans are sold. If the new
10
guidance had been implemented at December 31, 2003, the Bank would not have recognized the $326,000 servicing released premium associated with the commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale until the underlying loan(s) had sold (subsequent to December 31, 2003) reducing net income by approximately $190,000 for the quarter and six months ended December 31, 2003. The Corporation has elected to prospectively apply this guidance to new loan commitments initiated after January 1, 2004.Note 5: Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements and Contractual ObligationsThe following table summarizes the Corporation's contractual obligations at December 31, 2003 and the effect these obligations are expected to have on the Corporation's liquidity and cash flows in future periods (in thousands):
The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, in the form of originating loans or providing funds under existing lines of credit, forward loan sale agreements to third parties and commitments to purchase investment securities. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Corporation's exposure to credit loss, in the event of non-performance by the other party to these financial instruments, is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments to extend credit as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. As of December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003, these commitments were $52.9 million and $157.2 million, respectively.Note 6: Recent Accounting PronouncementsSFAS No. 149:SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," is effective for hedging relationships entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." The adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have a significant impact on the Corporation's financial position, cash flows or results of operations.SFAS No. 150:SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity," establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope, which may have previously been reported as equity, as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, except for mandatory redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have a significant impact on the Corporation's financial position, cash flows or results of operations.FASB Interpretation ("FIN") No. 45:In November 2002, the FASB issued FIN No. 45, "Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees and Indebtedness of Others," an interpretation of SFAS Nos. 5, 57 and 107, and rescission of FIN No. 34, "Disclosure of Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others."
11
FIN No. 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also requires that a guarantor recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of this interpretation are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, while the provisions of the disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of this Interpretation on January 1, 2003 did not have a material impact on the Corporation's results of operations, financial position or cash flows.FIN No. 46:In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51. FIN No. 46 requires that variable interest entities be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity's activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns or both. FIN No. 46 also requires disclosures about variable interest entities that companies are not required to consolidate but in which a company has a significant variable interest. The consolidation requirements of FIN No. 46 applied immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The consolidation requirements will apply to entities established prior to January 31, 2003 in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The disclosure requirements will apply in all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003. The adoption of FIN No. 46 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporation's financial position, cash flows or results of operations.FIN No. 46R:In December 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46R, a revision of FIN No. 46. FIN No. 46R requires that variable interest entities be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity's activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns or both. FIN 46R also requires disclosure about variable interest entities that companies are not required to consolidate but which a company has a significant variable interest. The consolidation requirements will apply to entities established prior to December 31, 2003 by the beginning of the fiscal year or interim period beginning after December 15, 2004. The adoption of FIN No. 46R will not have a significant impact on the Corporation's financial position, cash flows or results of operations.Note 7: Subsequent EventsOn January 22, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Bank declared a cash dividend of $2.0 million to the Corporation. Accordingly, the Bank paid $2.0 million to the Corporation on January 27, 2004. ITEM 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsGeneralProvident Financial Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was organized in January 1996 for the purpose of becoming the holding company for Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. upon the Bank's conversion from a federal mutual to a federal stock savings bank ("Conversion"). The Conversion was completed on June 27, 1996. At December 31, 2003, the Corporation had total assets of $1.3 billion, total deposits of $810.0 million and total stockholders' equity of $105.1 million. The Corporation has not engaged in any significant activity other than holding the stock of the Bank. Accordingly, the information set forth in this report, including financial statements and related data, relates primarily to the Bank and its subsidiaries.The Bank, founded in 1956, is federally chartered and headquartered in Riverside, California. The Bank is regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS"), its primary federal regulator, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), the insurer of its deposits. The Bank's deposits are federally insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC under the Savings Association Insurance Fund ("SAIF"). The Bank has been a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") System since 1956.The Bank's business consists of community banking activities and mortgage banking activities. Community banking activities primarily consist of accepting deposits from customers within the
communities surrounding the Bank's full service offices and investing these funds in single-family loans, multi-family loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial business loans, consumer loans and other real estate loans. In addition, the Bank also offers business checking accounts, other business banking services and is a servicer of loans for others. Mortgage banking activities consist of the origination and sale of mortgage and consumer loans secured primarily by single-family residences. The Bank's revenues are derived principally from interest on its loan and investment portfolios and fees generated through its community banking and mortgage banking activities. There are various risks inherent in the Bank's business including, among others, interest rate changes and the prepayment of loans and investments. The Corporation, from time to time, may repurchase its common stock as a way to enhance the Corporation's earnings per share. The Corporation considers the repurchase of its common stock if the market price of the stock is lower than its book value and/or the Corporation believes that the current market price is not commensurate with its current and future earnings potential. Consideration is also given to the Corporation's liquidity, regulatory capital requirements and future capital needs based on the Corporation's current business plan. The Corporation's Board of Directors authorizes each stock repurchase program, the duration of which is typically one year. Once the stock repurchase program is authorized, management may repurchase the Corporation's common stock from time to time in the open market, depending upon market conditions and the factors described above. On August 5, 2003, the Corporation announced that its Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 5 percent of its common stock, or approximately 369,069 shares, over a one-year period. The Corporation began to distribute quarterly cash dividends in the quarter ended September 2002. On October 24, 2003, the Corporation announced a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per share ($0.07 per share on a post-split basis) for the Corporation's shareholders of record at the close of the business day on November 4, 2003, which was paid on December 5, 2003. Also, on December 19, 2003, the Corporation announced a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per share for the Corporation's shareholders of record at the close of the business day on January 20, 2004, which was paid on February 6, 2004. Future declarations or payments of dividends will be subject to the consideration of the Corporation's Board of Directors, which will take into account the Corporation's financial condition, results of operations, tax considerations, capital requirements, industry standards, economic conditions and other factors, including the regulatory restrictions which affect the payment of dividends by the Bank to the Corporation. Under Delaware law, dividends may be paid either out of surplus or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year.Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Selected Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.Critical Accounting PoliciesThe discussion and analysis of the Corporation's financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Corporation's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires Management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Accounting for the allowance for loan losses involves significant judgments and assumptions by management, which have a material impact on the carrying value of net loans. Management considers this accounting policy to be a critical accounting policy. The allowance is based on two principles of accounting: (i) SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies," which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and can be estimated; and (ii) SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan" and SFAS No. 118, "Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan-Income Recognition and Disclosures," which require that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market
and the loan balance. The allowance has three components: (i) a formula allowance for groups of homogeneous loans, (ii) a specific allowance for identified problem loans and (iii) an unallocated allowance. Each of these components is based upon estimates that can change over time. The formula allowance is based primarily on historical experience and as a result can differ from actual losses incurred in the future. The history is reviewed at least quarterly and adjustments are made as needed. Various techniques are used to arrive at specific loss estimates, including historical loss information, discounted cash flows and fair market value of collateral. The use of these values is inherently subjective and the actual losses could be greater or less than the estimates. For further details, see the "Provision for Loan Losses" narrative on page 22. SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities," requires that off-balance sheet derivatives of the Corporation be recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements at fair value. Management considers this accounting policy to be a critical accounting policy. The Bank's derivatives are primarily the result of its mortgage banking activities in the form of commitments to extend credit (including servicing released premiums), commitments to sell loans and option contracts to hedge the risk of the commitments. Estimates of the percentage of commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale that may not fund are based upon historical data and current market trends. The fair value adjustments of the derivatives are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations with offsets to other assets or other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The Securities and Exchange Commission ("the SEC") staff recently expressed their view that loan commitments that are recognized as derivatives pursuant to SFAS No. 133 are written options, which by definition should be recorded as liabilities. The staff further indicated that they expected the practice of recognizing assets, and no liabilities, to be discontinued, and would not object if registrants discontinued this practice beginning in the first reporting period beginning after March 15, 2004. The Corporation's practice has been to recognize, at the initiation of the rate lock, the anticipated servicing released premium on the underlying loans. Consequently, the SEC guidance will delay that recognition until the loans are sold. If the new guidance had been implemented at December 31, 2003, the Bank would not have recognized the $326,000 servicing released premium associated with the commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale until the underlying loan(s) had sold (subsequent to December 31, 2003) reducing net income by approximately $190,000 for the quarter and six months ended December 31, 2003. The Corporation has elected to prospectively apply this guidance to new loan commitments initiated after January 1, 2004. Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003Total assets increased $36.1 million, or 3 percent, to $1.3 billion at December 31, 2003 from June 30, 2003. This increase was primarily a result of an increase in loans held for investment, which was partially offset by a decrease in cash and receivable from sale of loans.Total investment securities decreased $6.0 million, or 2 percent, to $291.1 million at December 31, 2003 from $297.1 million at June 30, 2003. For the first half of fiscal 2004, $79.2 million of investment securities were called by the issuers and $57.0 million of reductions were the result of mortgage-backed securities principal paydowns, while $133.2 million of investment securities were purchased. The high volume of called securities was primarily the result of a high volume of callable bonds purchased with coupon rates higher than market interest rates and short call dates during the period. The securities called were government agency callable bonds and were primarily issued by the FHLB, the Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC").Loans held for investment increased $125.9 million, or 17 percent, to $870.1 million at December 31, 2003 from $744.2 million at June 30, 2003. In the first half of fiscal 2004, the Bank originated $368.2 million of loans held for investment, of which $100.7 million, or 27 percent, were "preferred loans" (multi-family, commercial real estate, construction and commercial business loans), including the purchase of $10.7 million of "preferred loans" during the period. The collateral that secures the purchased loans is located primarily in Southern California. Total loan prepayments during the first half of fiscal 2004 were $222.1 million. The balance of "preferred loans" increased to $220.6 million, or 25 percent of loans held for investment at December 31, 2003, as compared to $212.8 million, or 29 percent of loans held for investment, at June 30, 2003. Purchased loans serviced by others at December 31, 2003 were $35.6 million or 4 percent of loans held for investment, compared to $45.2 million, or 6 percent of loans held for investment at June 30, 2003.
Loans held for sale increased $662,000, or 16 percent, to $4.9 million at December 31, 2003 from $4.2 million at June 30, 2003. The increase was the result of the timing differences between loan funding and loan sale dates.Receivable from the sale of loans declined $62.4 million, or 54 percent, to $52.5 million at December 31, 2003 from $114.9 million at June 30, 2003. The decline was the result of the timing differences between loan sale and loan sale settlement dates.Total deposits increased $55.9 million, or 7 percent, to $810.0 million at December 31, 2003 from $754.1 million at June 30, 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase of $93.2 million in transaction accounts and a decrease of $37.3 million in time deposits. The Corporation continued to focus on increasing transaction accounts and fee generating products and services by building client relationships.Borrowings, which consisted entirely of FHLB advances, decreased $11.0 million, or 3 percent, to $356.9 million at December 31, 2003 from $367.9 million at June 30, 2003. The average maturity of the Corporation's existing FHLB advances was approximately 39 months (27 months, based on put dates) at December 31, 2003 as compared to the average maturity of 36 months (24 months, based on put dates) at June 30, 2003. Total stockholders' equity decreased $1.7 million, or 2 percent, to $105.1 million at December 31, 2003, from $106.9 million at June 30, 2003, primarily as a result of the stock repurchases and the impact of stock based compensation accruals, which were partly offset by the net income during the first half of fiscal 2004. A total of 374,958 shares, at an average price of $20.16 per share, were repurchased during the first half of fiscal 2004. As of December 31, 2003, 62% of the existing authorized shares were repurchased; leaving approximately 141,669 shares available for future repurchases. Comparison of Operating Results for the Quarters and Six Months Ended December 31, 2003 and 2002The Corporation's net income for the second quarter ended December 31, 2003 was $3.1 million, a decrease of $798,000, or 21 percent, from $3.9 million during the same quarter of fiscal 2003. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the gain on sale of loans and partly offset by an increase in net interest income. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, the Corporation's net income was $6.7 million, down $911,000 or 12 percent from $7.6 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. This decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in the gain on sale of loans and gain on sale of investment securities, partially offset by an increase in net interest income.The Corporation's net interest income before loan loss provisions increased by $953,000, or 12 percent to $8.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 from $7.8 million during the comparable period of fiscal 2003. This increase was the result of higher average earning assets and a higher net interest margin. The average balance of earning assets increased $119.4 million, or 11 percent, to $1.2 billion in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $1.1 billion in the comparable period of fiscal 2003. The net interest margin increased to 2.95 percent in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, up 2 basis points from 2.93 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003. The increase in the net interest margin during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 was primarily attributable to a decline in the average cost of funds, which outpaced the decline in the average yield of the earning assets. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, the net interest income before loan loss provisions was $17.2 million, up $2.3 million, or 15 percent, from $14.9 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. This increase was the result of higher average earning assets, partially offset by a lower net interest margin. The average balance of earning assets increased $159.8 million, or 16 percent, to $1.2 billion in the first half of fiscal 2004 from $1.0 billion in the comparable period of fiscal 2003. The net interest margin decreased to 2.92 percent in the first half of fiscal 2004, down 1 basis point from 2.93 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003.The Corporation's efficiency ratio increased to 56 percent in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from 50 percent in the same period of fiscal 2003. For the six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the efficiency ratio was 55 percent and 51 percent, respectively.
Return on average assets for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 decreased 37 basis points to 0.99 percent from 1.36 percent in the same period last year. For the six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the return on average assets was 1.07 percent and 1.40 percent, respectively, a decrease of 33 basis points.Return on average equity for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 decreased to 11.90 percent from 15.30 percent in the same period last year. For the six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the return on average equity was 12.87 percent and 14.81 percent, respectively.Diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 were $0.43, a decrease of 14 percent from $0.50 for the quarter ended December 31, 2002. For the six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, diluted earnings per share were $0.92 and $0.96, respectively, a decrease of 4 percent. Interest Income. Total interest income increased by $96,000, or 1 percent, to $15.2 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from the same quarter of fiscal 2003. This increase was primarily the result of higher average earning assets, partly offset by a lower average earning asset yield. The average yield on earning assets during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 was 5.12 percent, 54 basis points lower than the average yield of 5.66 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003. Loan interest income increased $495,000, or 4 percent, to $13.0 million in the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as compared to $12.5 million for the same quarter of fiscal 2003. This increase was attributable to a higher average loan balance, partially offset by a lower average loan yield. The average balance of loans outstanding, including the loans held for sale, increased $150.5 million, or 20 percent, to $901.8 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $751.3 million during the same quarter of fiscal 2003. The average loan yield during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 decreased to 5.75 percent from 6.64 percent during the same quarter last year. The decline in the average loan yield was primarily attributable to the prepayment of higher yielding loans, adjustable portfolio loans adjusting to lower interest rates and new mortgage loans originated with lower interest rates. Interest income from investment securities decreased $404,000, or 16 percent, to $2.1 million during the quarter ended December 31, 2003 from $2.5 million during the same quarter of fiscal 2003. This decrease was primarily a result of decreases in average yield and average balance. The average yield on the investment securities portfolio decreased 13 basis points to 3.14 percent during the quarter ended December 31, 2003 from 3.27 percent during the quarter ended December 31, 2002. The average balance of investment securities decreased $38.4 million, or 13 percent, to $264.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $302.7 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2003. The decrease in the average yield of investment securities was primarily a result of higher yielding investment securities called during the preceding 12-month period and replaced with short-term and lower yielding investments.FHLB stock dividends increased by $2,000, or 1 percent, to $203,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $201,000 in the same period of fiscal 2003. This increase was attributable to a higher average balance, partially offset by a lower average yield. The average yield on FHLB stock decreased 132 basis points to 3.69 percent during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from 5.01 percent during the same period last year. The decrease in the average yield was primarily due to lower dividend accruals based upon the actual dividends received for the prior period. The average balance of FHLB stock increased $6.0 million to $22.0 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $16.0 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. The increase in FHLB stock was in accordance with the borrowing requirements of the FHLB. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, total interest income increased $346,000, or 1 percent, to $30.1 million as compared to $29.8 million for the same period of fiscal 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the average balance, partly offset by a decrease in the average yield on earning assets. The average yield on earning assets decreased 74 basis points to 5.12 percent during the six months ended December 31, 2003 from 5.86 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003.Interest income from loans increased by $1.6 million, or 7 percent, to $25.8 million during the first six months of fiscal 2004 from $24.2 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the average balance, partly offset by a decrease in the average yield on earning assets. The average loans outstanding increased $175.4 million, or 25 percent, to $887.4 million during the six months ended December 31, 2003 from $712.0 million during the same period of fiscal
16
2003. The average yield on loans decreased 98 basis points to 5.82 percent during the first six months of fiscal 2004 as compared to 6.80 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003. The decline in the average loan yield was primarily attributable to loan prepayments and portfolio loans adjusting to lower interest rates as a result of the significant decline in mortgage interest rates, in addition to new mortgage loans originated with lower interest rates. Interest income from investment securities decreased $1.3 million, or 25 percent, to $3.9 million during the six months ended December 31, 2003 from $5.2 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. This decrease was primarily a result of decreases in the average yield and the average balance. The yield on the investment securities decreased 66 basis points to 2.91 percent during the six months ending December 31, 2003 from 3.57 percent during the six months ending December 31, 2002. The average balance of investment securities decreased $23.4 million to $265.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2004 from $289.1 million in the same period of fiscal 2003. FHLB stock dividends increased $40,000, or 10 percent, to $433,000 in the first six months of fiscal 2004 from $393,000 in the same period of fiscal 2003. The increase was attributable to a higher average balance, partly offset by a lower average yield. The average balance of FHLB stock increased $7.4 million, or 52 percent, to $21.6 million during the first six months of fiscal 2004 from $14.2 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. The average yield on FHLB stock decreased 150 basis points to 4.02 percent during the first six months of fiscal 2004 from 5.52 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003. Interest income from interest-earning deposits increased $1,000, or 11 percent, to $10,000 in the first six months of fiscal 2004 from $9,000 in the same period of fiscal 2003. This increase was primarily a result of a higher average balance, partly offset by a lower average yield. The average balance of interest-bearing deposits increased to $1.7 million during the first six months of fiscal 2004 from $1.2 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. The increase in the average balance was primarily attributable to an increase of federal funds investments. The average yield on the interest-bearing deposits decreased 25 basis points to 1.20 percent during the first six months of fiscal 2004 from 1.45 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003. Interest Expense. Total interest expense for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 was $6.5 million as compared to $7.3 million for the same period of fiscal 2003, a decrease of $857,000, or 12 percent. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the average cost, partially offset by a higher average balance. The average cost of liabilities was 2.31 percent during the quarter ended December 31, 2003, down 60 basis points from 2.91 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003. The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased $110.7 million, or 11 percent, to $1.1 billion during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from $999.2 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. Interest expense on deposits for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 was $3.4 million as compared to $4.2 million for the same period of fiscal 2003, a decrease of $810,000, or 19 percent. The decrease in interest expense on deposits was primarily attributable to a lower average cost, partially offset by a higher average balance. The average cost of deposits decreased to 1.65 percent during the quarter ended December 31, 2003 from 2.34 percent during the same quarter of fiscal 2003, a decline of 69 basis points. The decline in the average cost of deposits was attributable to the general decline in interest rates and the change in the composition of the deposits. The average balance of transaction account deposits increased to 68 percent of total deposits in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, compared to 52 percent of the total deposits in the same period of fiscal 2003. Average outstanding deposits increased $100.5 million, or 14 percent, to $809.9 million during the quarter ended December 31, 2003 from $709.4 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. Interest expense on borrowings for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 decreased $47,000, or 1 percent, to $3.1 million from the same period of fiscal 2003. The decrease in interest expense on borrowings was primarily due to a lower average cost, partially offset by a higher average balance. The average cost of borrowings decreased to 4.08 percent for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 from 4.29 percent in the same quarter of fiscal 2003, a decline of 21 basis points. The decline in the average cost of borrowings was primarily attributable to maturing higher cost borrowings replaced with new borrowings at lower costs. The average balance of borrowings was $300.0 million during the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as compared to $289.8 million for the same quarter of fiscal 2003, an increase of $10.2 million, or 4 percent.
17
For the six months ended December 31, 2003, total interest expense decreased $2.0 million, or 13 percent, to $12.9 million as compared to $14.9 million for the same period of fiscal 2003. The decrease in total interest expense was primarily attributable to a lower average cost, partially offset by a higher average balance. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 79 basis points to 2.34 percent during the first six months of fiscal 2004 as compared to 3.13 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003. The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities during the six-month period of fiscal 2004 increased $155.6 million, or 17 percent, to $1.1 billion as compared to $942.0 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, interest expense on deposits decreased $1.9 million, or 22 percent, to $6.8 million as compared to $8.7 million for the same period of fiscal 2003. The decrease in interest expense on deposits was primarily a result of a lower average cost, partially offset by a higher average balance. The average cost of deposits decreased 77 basis points to 1.71 percent during the first six months of fiscal 2004 as compared to 2.48 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003. The decline in the average cost was attributable to the general decline in interest rates and the change in the composition of deposits. The average balance of deposits increased $93.4 million, or 13 percent, to $790.7 million during the first six months of fiscal 2004 from $697.3 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. The average balance of transaction account deposits increased to 66 percent of total deposits in the first six months of fiscal 2004, compared to 52 percent of the total deposits in the same period of fiscal 2003.For the six months ended December 31, 2003, interest expense on borrowings decreased $22,000 to $6.1 million as compared to $6.2 million for the same period of fiscal 2003. The decrease in interest expense on borrowings was primarily attributable to a lower average cost, partially offset by a higher average balance. The average cost of borrowings decreased 103 basis points to 3.96 percent during the first six months of fiscal 2004 as compared to 4.99 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003. The average balance of borrowings increased $62.2 million, or 25 percent, to $306.9 million in the first six months of fiscal 2004 as compared to $244.7 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. The decline in the average cost of borrowings was primarily attributable to maturing higher cost borrowings replaced with new borrowings at lower costs and an increase in the utilization of overnight borrowings at lower costs.
18
The following tables depict the average balance sheets for the quarters and six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively:
Average Balance Sheet(Dollars In Thousands)
20
The following tables provide the rate/volume variances for the quarters and six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively:
Rate/Volume Variance(In Thousands)
21
Provision for Loan Losses. A $269,000 loan loss provision was recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 2004, as compared to $565,000 during the same period of fiscal 2003, a decrease of $296,000, or 52 percent. The loan loss provision was recorded primarily as a result of the sequential quarter growth in loans held for investment; and the increase of "preferred loans" in loans held for investment. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, a $269,000 loan loss provision was recorded as compared to $765,000 for the same period of fiscal 2003, a decrease of $496,000, or 65 percent.The allowance for loan losses was $7.5 million at December 31, 2003 as compared to $7.2 million at June 30, 2003. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for investment was 0.85 percent at December 31, 2003 as compared to 0.96 percent at June 30, 2003.The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for estimated losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio and upon management's continuing analysis of the factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. These factors include changes in the size and composition of the loan portfolio, actual loan loss experience, current economic conditions, detailed analysis of individual loans for which full collectibility may not be assured, and determination of the realizable value of the collateral securing the loans. Provisions for losses are charged against operations on a monthly basis as necessary to maintain the allowance at appropriate levels. Management believes that the amount maintained in the allowance will be adequate to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio. Although Management believes it uses the best information available to make such determinations, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing the Corporation's loan portfolio, will not request the Corporation to significantly increase its allowance for loan losses. Future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected due to economic, operating, regulatory, and other conditions beyond the control of the Corporation.
22
The following table is provided to disclose additional details on the Corporation's allowance for loan losses and asset quality:
Non-Interest Income. Total non-interest income decreased $2.1 million, or 34 percent, to $4.1 million during the quarter ended December 31, 2003 from $6.2 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. The decrease in non-interest income was primarily attributable to decreases in the gain on sale of loans.The gain on sale of loans decreased $2.2 million, or 45 percent, to $2.7 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 from $4.9 million during the same quarter of fiscal 2003. This decrease was primarily the result of a lower volume of loans originated for sale. Total loans originated for sale during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 decreased $129.8 million, or 40 percent, to $192.2 million as compared to $322.0 million in the same period of fiscal 2003. The average loan sale margin for PBM during the second quarter of fiscal 2004 was 1.54 percent, down from 1.60 percent in the same period of fiscal 2003. Loan sale volume, which is defined as PBM loans originated for sale adjusted for the change in commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale, was $173.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 as compared to $305.5 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2003. The gain on sale of loans includes an unfavorable adjustment of $244,000 on derivative financial instruments (SFAS No. 133) in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 as compared to an unfavorable adjustment of $248,000 in the same quarter of fiscal 2003. The average profit margin for PBM in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 and 2003 was 81 basis points and 109 basis points, respectively. The average profit margin is defined as income before taxes divided by total loans funded during the period (including brokered loans) adjusted for the change in commitments to
23
extend credit. The decrease in the profit margin was primarily due to the decline in the gain on sale of loans resulting from the lower volume of loans originated for sale. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, total non-interest income decreased $3.5 million, or 28 percent, to $8.8 million from $12.3 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. The decrease in non-interest income was primarily attributable to a decrease in the gain on sale of loans.For the six months ended December 31, 2003, the gain on sale of loans decreased $3.1 million, or 34 percent, to $5.9 million from $9.0 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. This decrease was primarily the result of a lower average loan sale margin, a lower volume of loans originated for sale and an unfavorable SFAS No. 133 adjustment. The average loan sale margin for PBM during the first six months of fiscal 2004 was 1.29 percent as compared to 1.52 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003. The lower loan sale margin was primarily attributable to an increase in interest rate volatility during the first quarter of fiscal 2004, which resulted in higher hedging costs and a less favorable product mix as a result of the high demand for fixed-rate loans. Loan sale volume was $447.5 million in the first half of fiscal 2004 as compared to $590.8 million in the same period of fiscal 2003. The gain on sale of loans includes an unfavorable adjustment of $672,000 on derivative financial instruments (SFAS No. 133) in the six months ended December 31, 2003 as compared to a favorable adjustment of $38,000 in the same period of fiscal 2003.The average profit margin for PBM in the first six months of fiscal 2004 and 2003 was 80 basis points and 103 basis points, respectively. Non-Interest Expense. Total non-interest expense increased $134,000, or 2 percent, to $7.2 million in the quarter ended December 31, 2003 from $7.1 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2003. This increase was primarily the result of compensation and marketing costs associated with the new banking center in the Orangecrest area of Riverside, California, which opened in late August 2003, and an increase in incentive compensation as a result of transaction account growth. The Mortgage Banking Division incurred decreased commissions and loan production incentives in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, which were $119,000 lower than in the same period in fiscal 2003. The efficiency ratio in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 increased to 56 percent as compared to 50 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003.For the six months ended December 31, 2003, total non-interest expense increased $404,000, or 3 percent, to $14.2 million from $13.8 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. This increase was primarily the result of compensation and marketing costs associated with the new banking center, which opened in late August 2003, and an increase in incentive compensation as a result of transaction account growth. For the six months ended December 31, 2003, the efficiency ratio increased to 55 percent from 51 percent during the same period of fiscal 2003.Income taxes. Income tax expense was $2.3 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as compared to $2.5 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. The effective tax rate for the quarters ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 was approximately 43 percent and 40 percent, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate was due primarily to the recognition of a $78,000 state tax refund in the second quarter of fiscal 2003.For the six months ended December 31, 2003, income tax expense was $4.9 million as compared to $5.1 million during the same period of fiscal 2003. The effective tax rate for the six months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 was approximately 42 percent and 40 percent, respectively.Asset QualityNon-accrual loans, which primarily consisted of single-family loans, increased $995,000, or 66 percent, to $2.5 million at December 31, 2003 from $1.5 million at June 30, 2003. No interest accruals were made for loans that were past due 90 days or more. The non-accrual and 90 days or more past due loans as a percentage of net loans held for investment increased to 0.29 percent at December 31, 2003 from 0.20 percent at June 30, 2003. Non-performing
assets, including real estate owned, as a percentage of total assets increased to 0.19 percent at December 31, 2003 from 0.16 percent at June 30, 2003. The Bank reviews loans individually to identify when impairment has occurred. Loans are identified as impaired when it is deemed probable that the borrower will be unable to meet the scheduled principal and interest payments under the terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, except that as a practical expedient, the Bank may measure impairment based on a loan's observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.The following table is provided to disclose details on asset quality (dollars in thousands):
25
The following table is provided to disclose details related to the volume of loans originated, purchased and sold:Loan Volume Activities(In Thousands)
Liquidity and Capital ResourcesThe Corporation's primary sources of funding include deposits, proceeds from loan interest and scheduled principal payments, sales of loans, loan prepayments, interest income on investment securities, the maturity or principal payments on investment securities, and FHLB advances. While maturities and the scheduled amortization of loans and investment securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows, loan sales, and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by interest rates, economic conditions, and competition.The Bank has a standard credit facility available from the FHLB of San Francisco equal to 40 percent of its total assets, collateralized by loans and securities. As of December 31, 2003, the Bank's available credit facility from the FHLB was $465.7 million. In addition to the FHLB credit facility, the Bank has an unsecured line of credit in the amount of $45.0 million with its correspondent bank. Additionally, available for sale investment securities, which total $214.7 million as of December 31, 2003, could be sold to generate liquidity.The Bank must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to support loan growth, to cover deposit withdrawals, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of investment opportunities. The Bank generally maintains sufficient cash to meet short-term liquidity needs. At December 31, 2003, cash and cash equivalents totaled $24.4 million, or 2 percent of total assets. Depending on market conditions and the pricing of deposit products and FHLB borrowings, the Bank may rely on FHLB borrowings or unsecured lines of credit for its liquidity needs.Although the OTS eliminated the minimum liquidity requirement for savings institutions in April 2001, regulation still requires thrifts to maintain adequate liquidity to assure safe and sound operation. The Bank's average liquidity ratio for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 decreased to 20 percent from 36 percent during the same period ending December 31, 2002. This decrease was primarily a result of redeployment of available cash flows into loans held for investment.The Bank continues to experience a large volume of loan prepayments in its loan portfolio and it continues to be a challenge to reinvest these cash flows in assets that carry similar or better interest rate risk characteristics. The recent refinance market has been dominated by fixed rate loans and the Bank does not add long-term fixed rate loans to its portfolio, particularly when interest rates are at or near historical lows. Therefore, although the Bank has taken steps to address the issue of rising liquidity levels, a large percentage of its earning assets are invested at significantly lower rates than desirable. The Bank has mitigated the impact of this in several ways. The Bank has generated more loans for portfolio from its mortgage banking, business banking and major loan divisions and purchased commercial real estate and construction loans from other financial institutions. This has been accomplished with prudent interest-rate-risk management practices.The Bank is committed to changing the loan portfolio composition with more emphasis on multi-family, commercial real estate, construction and commercial business loans. These loans generally have higher yields than single-family loans. During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the volume of loans generated for portfolio increased $32.6 million, or 20 percent, to $191.9 million as compared to $159.3 million in the comparable period last year. Of the total loans generated for portfolio in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, $51.8 million, or 27 percent were "preferred loans."The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum requirements can initiate certain mandatory actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet certain specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank's assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank's capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk-weightings, and other factors.
The Bank's actual and required capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2003 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Commitments and Derivative Financial InstrumentsThe Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, in the form of originating loans or providing funds under existing lines of credit, and forward loan sale agreements to third parties. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition. The Corporation's exposure to credit loss, in the event of non-performance by the counter party to these financial instruments, is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments to extend credit as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
In accordance with SFAS No. 133 and interpretations of the FASB's Derivative Implementation Group, the fair value of the commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale, forward loan sale agreements and put option contracts are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet, and are included in other assets or other liabilities. The Corporation does not apply hedge accounting to its derivative financial instruments; therefore, all changes in fair value are recorded in earnings. The net impact of derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of operations during the quarters ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 was a loss of $244,000 and a loss of $248,000, respectively.
Stockholders' EquityThe ability of the Corporation to pay dividends depends primarily on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Corporation. The Bank may not declare or pay a cash dividend if the effect thereof would cause its net worth to be reduced below either the amounts required for its liquidation account or the regulatory capital requirements imposed by federal and state regulation. During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the Bank paid $2.0 million of cash dividends to the Corporation for the primary purpose of funding stock repurchases and cash dividends declared to shareholders. Year to date, the Bank paid $4.0 million of cash dividends to the Corporation. On October 24, 2003, the Corporation announced a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share ($0.07 per share on a post-split basis) on the Corporation's outstanding shares of common stock; a total of $477,000 was paid on December 5, 2003 to shareholders of record on November 4, 2003. On December 19, 2003, the Corporation announced a 3-for-2 stock split and a quarterly cash dividend. Shareholders of record at the close of business on January 15, 2004 received one additional share of Common Stock for every two shares owned. The additional shares were distributed on February 2, 2004, and cash was paid in lieu of fractional shares. The Corporation also announced a quarterly cash dividend of $0.10 per share, a 50 percent increase to the cash dividend. Shareholders of record at the close of business on January 20, 2004 were entitled to receive the cash dividend, which was distributed on February 6, 2004. The accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect a $726,000 accrued dividend payable. No shares were repurchased during the second quarter of fiscal 2004. Year to date, a total of 374,958 shares, at an average price of $20.16 per share, were repurchased during the first half of fiscal 2004. As of December 31, 2003, 62 percent of the authorized shares of the August 2003 stock repurchase plan were purchased, leaving approximately 141,669 shares available for future repurchase. Stock Option Plan and Management Recognition PlanPursuant to the Stock Option Plan, options vest at a rate of 20 percent per year over a five-year period. In the second quarter of fiscal 2004, no stock options were granted, while 72,750 shares of stock options were exercised. As of December 31, 2003, a total of 785,850 shares of stock options were outstanding with an average exercise price of $9.93 per share and an average remaining life of 5.52 years.
Pursuant to the Management Recognition Plan, the restricted shares awarded under the plan vest at a rate of 20 percent per year over a five-year period. As of December 31, 2003, a total of 36,526 shares were allocated and outstanding, pending their respective distribution schedules. No MRP shares are available for future awards.
Safe-Harbor Statement
Certain matters in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements relate to, among others, expectations of the business environment in which the Corporation operates, projections of future performance, perceived opportunities in the market, potential future credit experience, and statements regarding the Corporation's mission and vision. These forward-looking statements are based upon current management expectations, and may, therefore, involve risks and uncertainties. The Corporation's actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from those suggested, expressed, or implied by forward-looking statements due to a wide range of factors including, but not limited to, the general business environment, interest rates, the California real estate market, the demand for loans, competitive conditions between banks and non-bank financial services providers, regulatory changes, and other risks detailed in the Corporation's reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. Forward-looking statements are effective only as of the date that they are made and the Corporation assumes no obligation to update this information.ITEM 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskThe principal financial objective of the Corporation's interest rate risk management function is to achieve long-term profitability while limiting its exposure to the fluctuation of interest rates. The Bank, through its Asset and Liability Committee ("ALCO"), has sought to reduce the exposure of its earnings to changes in market interest rates by managing the mismatch between asset and liability maturities. The principal element in achieving this objective is to manage the interest-rate sensitivity of the Bank's assets by holding loans with interest rates subject to periodic market adjustments. In addition, the Bank maintains a liquid investment portfolio comprised of government agency securities, including mortgage backed securities, and investment grade securities. The Bank relies on retail deposits as its primary source of funding while utilizing FHLB advances as a secondary source of funding. As part of its interest rate risk management strategy, the Bank promotes transaction accounts and certificates of deposit with terms up to five years.Through the use of an internal interest rate risk model, the Bank is able to analyze its interest rate risk exposure by measuring the change in net portfolio value ("NPV") over a variety of interest rate scenarios. NPV is the net present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts. The calculation is intended to illustrate the change in NPV that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates of at least 100 basis points with no effect given to any steps that management might take to counter the effect of the interest rate movement.The results of the internal interest rate risk model are reconciled with the results provided by the OTS on a quarterly basis. Any significant deviations are researched and adjusted where applicable. Historically, the internal model has generally reflected a more conservative position than the OTS model.
The following table is provided by the OTS and represents the NPV based on the indicated changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2003 (dollars in thousands).
The following table is provided by the OTS and represents the change in the NPV at a +200 basis point rate shock at December 31, 2003 and a -100 basis point rate shock at June 30, 2003.
As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage ("ARM") loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from certificates of deposit could likely deviate significantly from those assumed when calculating the tables above. It is also possible that, as a result of an interest rate increase, the higher mortgage payments required from ARM borrowers could result in an increase in delinquencies and defaults. Changes in market interest rates may also affect the volume and profitability of the Corporation's mortgage banking operations. Accordingly, the data presented in the tables above should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results in the event of changes in interest rates. Furthermore, the NPV presented in the foregoing tables is not intended to present the fair market value of the Bank, nor does it represent amounts that would be available for distribution to stockholders in the event of the liquidation of the Corporation.ITEM 4 - Controls and Procedures
PART II - OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1. Legal ProceedingsFrom time to time the Corporation or its subsidiaries are engaged in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, none of which are currently considered to have a material impact on the Corporation's financial position or results of operations.Item 2. Changes in SecuritiesNot applicable.Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior SecuritiesNot applicable.Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of StockholdersThe Corporation's 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on November 18, 2003 at the Riverside Art Museum, 3425 Mission Inn Avenue, Riverside, California. The results of the vote on the three items presented at the meeting were as follows (the results have not been split adjusted):a) Election of Directors: Shareholders elected the following nominees to the Board of Directors for a three-year term ending in 2006 by the following vote:
The following directors, who were not up for re-election at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, will continue to serve as directors: Joseph P. Barr, Bruce W. Bennett, Debbie H. Guthrie, Craig G. Blunden, Seymour M. Jacobs, and Roy H. Taylor.
Item 5. Other InformationThe Southern California wildfires in October 2003 had no material impact on the Corporation's results of operations, financial position or cash flows for the quarter ended December 31, 2003. Also, the recently announced revisions of the real estate investment trust-related tax laws by the State of California Franchise Tax Board will have no impact on the Corporation.Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
<PAGE
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Craig G. Blunden, certify that:
1.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Donavon P. Ternes, certify that:
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Craig G. Blunden, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Donavon P. Ternes, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: