UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☑
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
or
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-13545 (Prologis, Inc.) 001-14245 (Prologis, L.P.)
Prologis, Inc.
Prologis, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland (Prologis, Inc.)
Delaware (Prologis, L.P.)
94-3281941 (Prologis, Inc.)
94-3285362 (Prologis, L.P.)
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California
94111
(Address or principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(415) 394-9000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
New York Stock Exchange
4.000% Notes due 2018
1.375% Notes due 2020
1.375% Notes due 2021
3.000% Notes due 2022
3.375% Notes due 2024
3.000% Notes due 2026
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Prologis, Inc. – NONE
Prologis, L.P. – NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Prologis, Inc.: Yes ☑ No ☐
Prologis, L.P.: Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Prologis, Inc.: Yes ☐ No ☑
Prologis, L.P.: Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Prologis, Inc.: Yes ☑ No ☐ Prologis, L.P.: Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website; if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Prologis, Inc.: Yes ☑ No ☐ Prologis, L.P.: Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
Prologis, Inc.:
☑ Large accelerated filer
☐ Accelerated filer
☐ Non-accelerated filer (do not check if a smaller reporting company)
☐ Smaller reporting company
Prologis, L.P.:
☐ Large accelerated filer
☑ Non-accelerated filer (do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Based on the closing price of Prologis, Inc.’s common stock on June 30, 2016, the aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by nonaffiliates of Prologis, Inc. was $25,583,323,441.
The number of shares of Prologis, Inc.’s common stock outstanding at February 10, 2017, was approximately 529,345,000.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Part III of this report are incorporated by reference to the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2017 annual meeting of its stockholders or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “Prologis, Inc.” or the “Parent” mean Prologis, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries; and references to “Prologis, L.P.” or the “Operating Partnership” mean Prologis, L.P., and its consolidated subsidiaries. The terms “the Company,” “Prologis,” “we,” “our” or “us” means the Parent and the Operating Partnership collectively.
The Parent is a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) and the general partner of the Operating Partnership. At December 31, 2016, the Parent owned an approximate 97.42% common general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership and 100% of the preferred units in the Operating Partnership. The remaining approximate 2.58% common limited partnership interests are owned by nonaffiliated investors and certain current and former directors and officers of the Parent. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Parent has complete responsibility and discretion in the day-to-day management and control of the Operating Partnership.
We operate the Parent and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management of the Parent consists of the same members as the management of the Operating Partnership. These members are officers of the Parent and employees of the Operating Partnership or one of its subsidiaries. As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, the Parent consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes. Because the only significant asset of the Parent is its investment in the Operating Partnership, the assets and liabilities of the Parent and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements.
We believe combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of the Parent and the Operating Partnership into this single report results in the following benefits:
•
enhances investors’ understanding of the Parent and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation as a substantial portion of the Company’s disclosure applies to both the Parent and the Operating Partnership; and
creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.
It is important to understand the few differences between the Parent and the Operating Partnership in the context of how we operate the Company. The Parent does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and issuing public equity from time to time. The Parent itself does not incur any indebtedness, but it guarantees the unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all the assets of the business, directly or indirectly, and holds the ownership interests in the Company’s investment in certain entities. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from equity issuances by the Parent, which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units, the Operating Partnership generates capital required by the business through the Operating Partnership’s operations, incurrence of indebtedness and issuance of partnership units to third parties.
The presentation of noncontrolling interests, stockholders’ equity and partners’ capital are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of the Parent and those of the Operating Partnership. The common limited partnership interests held by the limited partners in the Operating Partnership are presented as limited partners’ capital within partners’ capital in the Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and as noncontrolling interest within equity in the Parent’s consolidated financial statements. The common and preferred partnership interests held by the Parent in the Operating Partnership are presented as general partner’s capital within partners’ capital in the Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements and as preferred stock, common stock, additional paid-in capital, accumulated other comprehensive loss and distributions in excess of net earnings within stockholders’ equity in the Parent’s consolidated financial statements. The differences in the presentations between stockholders’ equity and partners’ capital result from the differences in the equity and capital issuances at the Parent and Operating Partnership levels.
To highlight the differences between the Parent and the Operating Partnership, separate sections in this report, as applicable, individually discuss the Parent and the Operating Partnership, including separate financial statements and separate Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications. In the sections that combine disclosure of the Parent and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of Prologis.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item
Description
Page
PART I
1.
Business
3
The Company
Business Strategy and Operating Segments
5
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
7
Environmental Matters
8
Insurance Coverage
1A.
Risk Factors
1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
15
2.
Properties
Geographic Distribution
Lease Expirations
18
Co-Investment Ventures
19
3.
Legal Proceedings
4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
20
Market Information and Holders
Preferred Stock Dividends
21
Sale of Unregistered Securities
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Other Stockholder Matters
6.
Selected Financial Data
22
7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management’s Overview
Results of Operations
23
32
Liquidity and Capital Resources
33
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
37
Contractual Obligations
38
Critical Accounting Policies
New Accounting Pronouncements
40
Funds from Operations Attributable to Common Stockholders/Unitholders ("FFO")
7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
42
8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
43
9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
9A.
Controls and Procedures
9B.
Other Information
44
PART III
10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
11.
Executive Compensation
12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
45
14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
15.
Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules
16.
Form 10-K Summary
2
The statements in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which we operate as well as management’s beliefs and assumptions. Such statements involve uncertainties that could significantly impact our financial results. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” and “estimates” including variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future — including statements relating to rent and occupancy growth, development activity, contribution and disposition activity, general conditions in the geographic areas where we operate, our debt, capital structure and financial position, our ability to form new co-investment ventures and the availability of capital in existing or new co-investment ventures — are forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained, and therefore actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that may affect outcomes and results include, but are not limited to: (i) national, international, regional and local economic and political climates, (ii) changes in global financial markets, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, (iii) increased or unanticipated competition for our properties, (iv) risks associated with acquisitions, dispositions and development of properties, (v) maintenance of REIT status, tax structuring and changes in income tax rates, (vi) availability of financing and capital, the levels of debt that we maintain and our credit ratings, (vii) risks related to our investments in our co-investment ventures, including our ability to establish new co-investment ventures, (viii) risks of doing business internationally, including currency risks, (ix) environmental uncertainties, including risks of natural disasters, and (x) those additional factors discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors in this report. We undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statements appearing in this report except as may be required by law.
ITEM 1. Business
Prologis, Inc. is a self-administered REIT and is the sole general partner of Prologis, L.P. We operate Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P. as one enterprise and, therefore, our discussion and analysis refers to Prologis, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including Prologis, L.P., collectively.
Prologis, Inc. began operating as a fully integrated real estate company in 1997 and elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Internal Revenue Code”). We believe the current organization and method of operation will enable Prologis, Inc. to maintain its status as a REIT. Prologis, L.P. also was formed in 1997.
Our corporate headquarters are at Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111, and our other principal offices are located in Amsterdam, Denver, Luxembourg, Mexico City, Shanghai, Singapore and Tokyo.
Our Internet address is www.prologis.com. All reports required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) are available and can be accessed free of charge through the Investor Relations section of our website, www.prologis.com. The common stock of Prologis, Inc. is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker “PLD” and is a component of the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500.
THE COMPANY
We are the global leader in logistics real estate with a focus on high-barrier, high-growth markets. We own, manage and develop high-quality logistics facilities in the world’s most active centers of commerce. An investment in Prologis taps into key drivers of economic growth, including consumption, supply chain modernization, e-commerce and urbanization.
Customers turn to us because they know an efficient supply chain will make their businesses run better, and that a strategic relationship with Prologis will create a competitive advantage. We lease modern logistics facilities to a diverse base of approximately 5,200 customers. These facilities assist the efficient distribution of goods for the world’s best businesses and brands.
We invest in Class-A logistics facilities in the world’s primary population centers with high barriers to entry and supported by extensive transportation infrastructure (major airports, seaports, rail systems and highway systems). We believe our portfolio is the highest-quality logistics property portfolio in the industry because it is focused in those key markets. Our local teams actively manage the portfolio, which encompasses leasing and property management, new capital deployment activities and an opportunistic disposition program. The majority of our consolidated properties are in the United States (or “U.S.”); while outside the U.S., our properties are generally held in co-investment ventures, which reduces our exposure to movements in foreign currency. Therefore, we are principally an owner-operator in the U.S. and a manager-developer outside the U.S.
Macroeconomics and demographics are important drivers of our business; these drivers include population growth, consumption and rising affluence. In the developed markets of U.S., Europe and Japan, key factors are the reconfiguration of supply chains (strongly influenced by e-commerce trends), and the operational efficiencies that can be realized from our modern logistics facilities. In emerging markets, such as Brazil, China and Mexico, new affluence and the rise of the consumer classes have prompted demand as supply chains are constructed. Taken together, logistics real estate markets benefit from economic growth, as well as from the modernization of supply chains around the world.
We manage our business on an owned and managed basis, including properties wholly owned by us or owned by one of our co-investment ventures, which allows us to make decisions based on the property operations versus our ownership. We believe the operating fundamentals of our owned and managed portfolio are consistent with those of our consolidated portfolio, and therefore we generally look at operating metrics on an owned and managed basis.
At December 31, 2016, we owned or had investments in, on a wholly owned basis or through co-investment ventures, properties and development projects expected to total $52.1 billion in gross total investment across 676 million square feet (63 million square meters) in 20 countries spanning four continents. Our investment was $30.8 billion, which consisted of our wholly-owned properties and our pro rata (or ownership) share of the properties owned by our co-investment ventures.
Throughout this document, we reflect amounts in U.S. dollars, our reporting currency. Included in these amounts are consolidated and unconsolidated investments denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the British pound sterling, euro and Japanese yen that are impacted by fluctuations in exchange rates when translated into U.S. dollars. We mitigate our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations by investing outside the U.S. through co-investment ventures, borrowing in local currency and utilizing derivative instruments.
Details of the 676 million square feet at December 31, 2016, in our owned and managed portfolio were as follows (dollars and square feet in millions):
U.S.
Other Americas
Europe
Asia
Total
Operating portfolio (number of buildings)
2,058
240
736
102
3,136
Operating portfolio (square feet)
358
51
172
41
622
Development portfolio (square feet)
12
4
9
Other real estate properties (square feet)
-
1
10
Total square feet
377
55
183
61
676
Operating portfolio (gross book value)
$
27,148
3,100
12,010
5,021
47,279
Development portfolio (TEI) (1)
924
304
669
1,488
3,385
Land portfolio (gross book value)
474
356
431
164
1,425
28,546
3,760
13,110
6,673
52,089
(1)
Total expected investment (“TEI”) represents total estimated cost of development or expansion, including land, development and leasing costs without any depreciation. TEI is based on current projections and is subject to change. Non-U.S. dollar investments were translated to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at period end.
Our operating portfolio includes stabilized logistics facilities in our owned and managed portfolio. A developed property moves into the operating portfolio when it meets stabilization. The property is considered stabilized when a development project has been completed for one year or is at least 90% occupied, whichever occurs first.
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND OPERATING SEGMENTS
Our business comprises two operating segments: Real Estate Operations and Strategic Capital.
REAL ESTATE –
RENTAL OPERATIONS
Generate revenues and net operating income (“NOI”) by maintaining high occupancy rates and increasing rents
DEVELOPMENT
Generate value from development
STRATEGIC CAPITAL
Access third-party capital to grow our business and earn recurring fees and promotes
We have a high-quality logistics portfolio that serves premier companies across the globe. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we:
•generated over 90% of our consolidated revenues and NOI from our buildings in the U.S.
•increased consolidated revenues and NOI over 12% from 2015
•ended the year with consolidated occupancy of 97.0%
Development contributes to significant earnings growth as projects lease up and generate revenues and NOI. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we:
•stabilized a total estimated investment in our owned and managed portfolio of $2.5 billion of development projects with an estimated weighted average margin of 25.5%
•created $640 million of value (of which $571 million is our share)
Durable fee stream with more than 90% from perpetual or long-life co-investment ventures with some of the world’s largest institutional partners. For the year ended December 31, 2016, we:
•generated approximately 90% of our consolidated Strategic Capital revenues from outside the U.S.
•increased consolidated Strategic Capital revenues over 40% from 2015
Real Estate Operations
Rental Operations. Rental operations comprise the largest component of our operating segments and contributed approximately 90% of our consolidated revenues, earnings and funds from operations in 2016 (see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for more information on funds from operations, a non-GAAP measure). We collect rent from our customers through operating leases, including reimbursements for the majority of our property operating costs. We expect to generate long-term internal growth by maintaining high occupancy rates, increasing rents and controlling expenses. We believe our active portfolio management, coupled with the skills of our property, leasing, maintenance, capital, energy and risk management teams, will allow us to maximize rental revenues across our portfolio. In 2016, over 90% of our consolidated revenues and NOI in this segment were generated in the U.S. NOI from this segment is calculated directly from our financial statements as rental revenues, rental recoveries and development management and other revenues less rental expenses and other expenses.
Development. We utilize (i) our land bank, (ii) the development expertise of our local teams, (iii) our customer relationships and (iv) our in-depth local knowledge in connection with our development activities. Successful development and redevelopment efforts increase both the rental revenues and the net asset value of our Real Estate Operations segment. We measure the value we created based on the increase in estimated fair value of a stabilized development property, as compared to the costs incurred. Generally, we develop properties in the U.S. for long-term hold and outside the U.S. for contribution to our co-investment ventures. Occasionally, we develop for sale to third parties.
Strategic Capital
Real estate is a capital-intensive business that requires growth capital. Our strategic capital business gives us access to third-party capital, both private and public, which allows us to diversify our sources of capital and therefore have a broader range of options to fund our growth. We co-invest with some of the world’s largest institutional partners to grow our business and provide incremental revenues. We also access alternative sources of equity through two publicly traded vehicles: Nippon Prologis REIT, Inc. (“NPR”) in Japan and FIBRA Prologis in Mexico. We tailor logistics portfolios to meet our partners’ specific needs, with a focus on long-term ventures and open-ended funds. We hold significant ownership interests in these ventures, aligning our interests with those of our partners.
We generate strategic capital revenues from our unconsolidated ventures principally through asset management and property management services, and we earn additional revenues by providing leasing, acquisition, construction, development, financing and disposition services. Depending on the structure of the venture and the returns provided to our partners, we also earn revenues through incentive fees (“promotes”) periodically during the life of a venture or upon liquidation. In 2016, we earned promote revenues in Europe of $89 million. Approximately 40% of promote revenues are paid as a combination of cash and stock awards pursuant to the terms of the Prologis Promote Plan and expensed through Strategic Capital Expenses. This segment contributed approximately 10% of our consolidated revenues, earnings and funds from operations in 2016. We plan to grow this business through increasing the assets under management in our existing ventures. In 2016, approximately 90% of the consolidated revenues and NOI in this segment were generated outside the U.S. NOI in this segment is calculated as Strategic Capital Revenues less Strategic Capital Expenses directly from each line item in the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data and does not include property related NOI.
Competition
Competitively priced logistics space could impact our occupancy rates and have an adverse effect on how much rent we can charge, which in turn could affect both of our operating segments. We may face competition with regard to our capital deployment activities, including local, regional and national operators or developers. We also face competition from investment managers for institutional capital within our strategic capital business.
We believe we have competitive advantages due to our:
properties being focused in the world’s primary population centers with high barriers to entry and supported by extensive transportation infrastructure;
ability to respond quickly to customers’ needs for high-quality logistics facilities;
established relationships with key customers served by our local teams;
ability to leverage our organizational scale and structure to provide a single point of contact for our focus customers through our global customer solutions team;
property management and leasing expertise;
relationships and proven track record with current and prospective investors in our strategic capital business;
experience developing and managing logistics facilities;
well-positioned land bank; and
team members with experience in the land entitlement and development processes.
Customers
Our broad customer base represents a spectrum of international, national, regional and local logistics users. At December 31, 2016, in our Real Estate Operations segment representing our consolidated properties, we had more than 3,200 customers occupying 334 million square feet of logistics space. On an owned and managed basis, we had more than 5,200 customers occupying 625 million square feet of logistics space.
In our Strategic Capital segment, we view our partners and investors as our customers. At December 31, 2016, in our private ventures, we partnered with approximately 100 investors, several of which invest in multiple ventures.
6
The following table details our top 25 customers at December 31, 2016 (square feet in millions):
Consolidated – Real Estate Operations
Owned and Managed
Top Customers
% of NER (1)
Total Occupied Square Feet
1. Amazon.com
5.0
13
3.1
2. Home Depot
1.8
2. DHL
1.6
3. FedEx
1.3
3. Geodis
1.2
4. XPO Logistics
1.0
5. Wal-Mart
0.9
5. Kuehne + Nagel
1.1
6. BMW
6. FedEx
7. U.S. Government
7. Home Depot
8. Ingram Micro
0.8
8. CEVA Logistics
9. PepsiCo
0.7
9. Wal-Mart
10. DSV Air and Sea
0.6
Top 10 Customers
13.9
39
12.6
76
11. UPS
11. Nippon Express
12. Kuehne + Nagel
12. BMW
13. APL Logistics
13. UPS
14. Best Buy
14. Hitachi
0.5
15. DHL
15. DB Schenker
16. Cal Cartage Company
16. U.S. Government
17. Sears
17. Tesco
18. Kimberly-Clark
18. Ingram Micro
19. Geodis
19. Panalpina
0.4
20. NFI Industries
20. PepsiCo
21. Office Depot
21. Samsung Electronics
0.3
22. Kellogg's
22. Best Buy
23. Mohawk Industries
23. APL Logistics
24. C&S Wholesale Grocers
24. Under Armour
25. Anixter
25. La Poste
Top 25 Customers
21.2
64
19.3
114
Net effective rent (“NER”) is calculated using the estimated total cash to be received over the term of the lease (including base rent and expense reimbursements) divided by the lease term to determine the amount of rent and expense reimbursements received per year. Amounts derived in a currency other than the U.S. dollar have been translated using the average rate from the previous twelve months.
Employees
The following table summarizes our employee base at December 31, 2016:
Regions
Number of Employees
U.S. (1)
830
105
370
225
1,530
This includes employees who are employed in the U.S. but also support other regions.
We allocate our employees who perform property management functions to our Real Estate Operations segment and Strategic Capital segment based on the size of the respective portfolios. Employees who perform only Strategic Capital functions are allocated directly to that segment.
We believe we have good relationships with our employees. Prologis employees are not organized under collective bargaining agreements, although some employees in Europe are represented by statutory Works Councils and as such, benefit from applicable labor agreements.
CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT
We maintain a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to our board of directors (the “Board”) and all of our officers and employees, including the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer and the principal accounting officer, and other people performing similar functions. A copy of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our website, www.prologis.com. In addition to being accessible through our website, copies of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct can be obtained, free of charge, upon written request to Investor Relations, Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111. Any amendments to or waivers of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that apply to the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer, the principal accounting officer, or other people performing similar functions, and that relate to any matter enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K, will be disclosed on our website.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
We are exposed to various environmental risks that may result in unanticipated losses and affect our operating results and financial condition. Either the previous owners or we have conducted environmental reviews on a majority of the properties we have acquired, including land. While some of these assessments have led to further investigation and sampling, none of the environmental assessments has revealed an environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. See further discussion in Item 1A. Risk Factors and Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
INSURANCE COVERAGE
We carry insurance coverage on our properties. We determine the type of coverage and the policy specifications and limits based on what we deem to be the risks associated with our ownership of properties and our business operations in specific markets. Such coverage typically includes property damage and rental loss insurance resulting from such perils as fire, windstorm, flood, earthquake and terrorism; commercial general liability insurance; and environmental insurance. Insurance is maintained through a combination of commercial insurance, self-insurance and a wholly-owned captive insurance entity. The costs to insure our properties are primarily covered through reimbursements from our customers. We believe that our insurance coverage contains policy specifications and insured limits that are customary for similar properties, business activities and markets and we believe our properties are adequately insured. See further discussion in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
Our operations and structure involve various risks that could adversely affect our business and financial condition, including but not limited to, our financial position, results of operations, cash flow, ability to make distributions and payments to security holders and the market value of our securities. These risks relate to our consolidated company as well as our investments in unconsolidated entities and include among others, (i) general risks; (ii) risks related to our business; (iii) risks related to financing and capital and (iv) income tax risks.
General Risks
As a global company, we are subject to social, political and economic risks of doing business in many countries.
We conduct a significant portion of our business and employ a substantial number of people outside of the U.S. During 2016, we generated approximately $453 million or 17.9% of our revenues from operations outside the U.S. Circumstances and developments related to international and U.S. operations that could negatively affect us include, but are not limited to, the following factors:
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing international operations in certain regions, including differing employment practices and labor issues;
local businesses and cultural factors that differ from our usual standards and practices;
volatility in currencies and currency restrictions, which may prevent the transfer of capital and profits to the U.S.;
challenges in establishing effective controls and procedures to regulate operations in different regions and to monitor compliance with applicable regulations, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom (“U.K.”) Bribery Act and other similar laws;
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, tax, tariffs and other laws within the U.S. or other countries in which we operate;
potentially adverse tax consequences;
the responsibility of complying with multiple and potentially conflicting laws, e.g., with respect to corrupt practices, employment and licensing;
the impact of regional or country-specific business cycles and economic instability, including instability in, or further withdrawals from, the European Union or other international trade alliances or agreements;
political instability, uncertainty over property rights, civil unrest, drug trafficking, political activism or the continuation or escalation of terrorist or gang activities;
foreign ownership restrictions in operations with the respective countries; and
access to capital may be more restricted, or unavailable on favorable terms or at all in certain locations.
In addition, we may be impacted by the ability of our non-U.S. subsidiaries to dividend or otherwise transfer cash among our subsidiaries, including transfers of cash to pay interest and principal on our debt, due to currency exchange control regulations, transfer pricing regulations and potentially adverse tax consequences, among other factors.
Disruptions in the global capital and credit markets may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
To the extent there is turmoil in the global financial markets, this turmoil has the potential to adversely affect (i) the value of our properties; (ii) the availability or the terms of financing that we have or may anticipate utilizing; (iii) our ability to make principal and interest payments on, or refinance any outstanding debt when due; and (iv) the ability of our customers to enter into new leasing transactions or satisfy rental payments under existing leases. Disruptions in the capital and credit markets may also adversely affect our ability to make distributions and payments to our security holders and the market price of our securities.
Our business and operations could suffer in the event of system failures or cyber security attacks.
Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for our internal and hosted information technology systems, our systems are vulnerable to damages from any number of sources, including energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication failures and cyber security attacks, such as computer viruses or unauthorized access. Any system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business. We may also incur additional costs to remedy damages caused by such disruptions. Any compromise of our security could result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, unauthorized access to information of ours and others, significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, loss or misuse of the information and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which could harm our business.
Risks associated with our dependence on key personnel.
We depend on the deep industry knowledge and the efforts of our executive officers and other key employees. From time to time, our personnel and their roles may change. While we believe that we are able to retain our key talent and find suitable employees to meet our personnel needs, the loss of key personnel, any change in their roles or the limitation of their availability could adversely affect our business. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain our executive officers, or if compensation costs required to attract and retain key employees become more expensive, our performance and competitive position could be materially adversely affected.
Our business could be adversely impacted if we have deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting.
The design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting may not prevent all errors, misstatements or misrepresentations. While management continually reviews the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, there can be no guarantee that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective in accomplishing all control objectives all of the time. Deficiencies, including any material weakness, in our internal control over financial reporting that may occur in the future could result in misstatements or restatements of our financial statements or a decline in the price of our securities.
The depreciation in the value of the foreign currency in countries where we have a significant investment may adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.
We pursue growth opportunities in international markets where the U.S. dollar is not the functional currency. At December 31, 2016, approximately $6.6 billion or 22.0% of our total consolidated assets are invested in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, euro and Japanese yen. As a result, we are subject to foreign currency risk due to potential fluctuations in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar. A significant change in the value of the foreign currency of one or more countries where we have a significant investment may have a material adverse effect on our business and, in particular, our U.S. dollar reported financial position and results of operations and debt covenant ratios. Although we attempt to mitigate adverse effects by borrowing under debt agreements denominated in foreign currencies and using derivative contracts, there can be no assurance that those attempts to mitigate foreign currency risk will be successful.
Our hedging of foreign currency and interest rate risk may not effectively limit our exposure to other risks.
Hedging arrangements involve risks, such as the risk of fluctuation in the relative value of the foreign currency or interest rates and the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements. The funds required to settle such arrangements could be significant depending on the stability and movement of the hedged foreign currency or the size of the underlying financing and the applicable interest rates at the time of the breakage. The failure to hedge effectively against foreign exchange changes or interest rate changes may adversely affect our business.
Compliance or failure to comply with regulatory requirements could result in substantial costs.
We are required to comply with many regulations in different countries, including (but not limited to) the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K Bribery Act and similar laws and regulations. Our properties are also subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act and state and local fire and life-safety requirements. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of governmental fines or the award of damages to private litigants. While we believe that we are currently in material compliance with these regulatory requirements, the requirements may change or new requirements may be imposed that could require significant unanticipated expenditures by us. If we are required to make unanticipated expenditures to comply with these regulations, we may be adversely affected.
Risks Related to our Business
Real estate investments are not as liquid as certain other types of assets, which may reduce economic returns to investors.
Real estate investments are not as liquid as certain other types of investments and this lack of liquidity may limit our ability to react promptly to changes in economic or other conditions. Significant expenditures associated with real estate investments, such as secured mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investments. As a REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code, we are only able to hold property for sale in the ordinary course of business through taxable REIT subsidiaries in order to not incur punitive taxation on any tax gain from the sale of such property. We may dispose of certain properties that have been held for investment to generate liquidity. If we do not satisfy certain safe harbors or we believe there is too much risk of incurring the punitive tax on any tax gain from the sale, we may not pursue such sales.
We may decide to sell properties to certain of our unconsolidated co-investment ventures or third parties to generate proceeds to fund our capital deployment activities. Our ability to sell properties on advantageous terms is affected by: (i) competition from other owners of properties that are trying to dispose of their properties; (ii) market conditions, including the capitalization rates applicable to our properties; and (iii) other factors beyond our control. If our competitors sell assets similar to assets we intend to divest in the same markets or at valuations below our valuations for comparable assets, we may be unable to divest our assets at favorable pricing or at all. The unconsolidated co-investment ventures or third parties who might acquire our properties may need to have access to debt and equity capital, in the private and public markets, in order to acquire properties from us. Should they have limited or no access to capital on favorable terms, then dispositions could be delayed.
If we do not have sufficient cash available to us through our operations, sales or contributions of properties or available credit facilities to continue operating our business as usual, we may need to find alternative ways to increase our liquidity. Such alternatives may include, without limitation, divesting ourselves of properties, whether or not they otherwise meet our strategic objectives to keep in the long term, at less than optimal terms, incurring debt, entering into leases with new customers at lower rental rates or less than optimal terms or entering into lease renewals with our existing customers without an increase in rental rates. There can be no assurance, however, that such alternative ways to increase our liquidity will be available to us. Additionally, taking such measures to increase our liquidity may adversely affect our business, and in particular, our distributable cash flow and debt covenants.
Our investments are concentrated in the logistics sector and our business would be adversely affected by an economic downturn in that sector.
Our investments in real estate assets are concentrated in the logistics sector. This concentration may expose us to the risk of economic downturns in this sector to a greater extent than if our business activities were more diversified.
General economic conditions and other events or occurrences that affect areas in which our properties are geographically concentrated, may impact financial results.
We are exposed to general economic conditions, local, regional, national and international economic conditions and other events and occurrences that affect the markets in which we own properties. Our operating performance is further impacted by the economic conditions of the specific markets in which we have concentrations of properties.
At December 31, 2016, approximately 33.0% of our consolidated operating properties or $8.0 billion (based on consolidated gross book value, or investment before depreciation) are located in California, which represented 26.3% of the aggregate square footage of our operating properties and 33.7% of our NOI. Our revenues from, and the value of, our properties located in California may be affected by local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of or reduced demand for logistics properties) and the local economic climate. Business layoffs, downsizing, industry slowdowns, changing demographics and other factors may adversely impact California’s economic climate. Because of the number of properties, we have located in California, a downturn in California’s economy or real estate conditions could adversely affect our business.
In addition to California, we also have significant holdings (defined as more than 3.0% of total consolidated investment before depreciation) in operating properties in certain markets located in Central and Eastern Pennsylvania, Chicago, Dallas/Fort Worth, New Jersey/New York City, Seattle and South Florida. Our operating performance could be adversely affected if conditions become less favorable in any of the markets in which we have a concentration of properties. Conditions such as an oversupply of logistics space or a reduction in demand for logistics space, among other factors, may impact operating conditions. Any material oversupply of logistics space or material reduction in demand for logistics space could adversely affect our overall business.
In addition, our owned and managed portfolio, including the unconsolidated co-investment ventures in which we invest, has concentrations of properties in the same markets mentioned above, as well as in markets in France, Germany, Japan and the U.K., and are subject to the economic conditions in those markets.
A number of our investments, both wholly-owned and owned through co-investment ventures, are located in areas that are known to be subject to earthquake activity. U.S. properties located in active seismic areas include properties in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, and Seattle. International properties located in active seismic areas include Japan and Mexico. We generally carry earthquake insurance on our properties located in areas historically subject to seismic activity, subject to coverage limitations and deductibles, if we believe it is commercially reasonable. We evaluate our earthquake insurance coverage annually in light of current industry practice through an analysis prepared by outside consultants and in some specific instances have elected to self-insure our earthquake exposure based on this analysis. We have elected not to carry earthquake insurance for our assets in Japan based on this analysis.
Furthermore, a number of our properties are located in areas that are known to be subject to hurricane or flood risk. We carry hurricane and flood hazard insurance on all of our properties located in areas historically subject to such activity, subject to coverage limitations and deductibles, if we believe it is commercially reasonable. We evaluate our insurance coverage annually in light of current industry practice through an analysis prepared by outside consultants.
Investments in real estate properties are subject to risks that could adversely affect our business.
Investments in real estate properties are subject to varying degrees of risk. While we seek to minimize these risks through geographic diversification of our portfolio, market research and our asset management capabilities, these risks cannot be eliminated. Factors that may affect real estate values and cash flows include:
local conditions, such as oversupply or a reduction in demand;
technological changes, such as reconfiguration of supply chains, autonomous vehicles, robotics, 3D printing or other technologies;
the attractiveness of our properties to potential customers and competition from other available properties;
increasing costs of maintaining, insuring, renovating and making improvements to our properties;
our ability to rehabilitate and reposition our properties due to changes in the business and logistics needs of our customers;
our ability to control rents and variable operating costs; and
governmental regulations and the associated potential liability under, and changes in, environmental, zoning, usage, tax, tariffs and other laws.
We may be unable to lease vacant space or renew leases or re-lease space on favorable terms as leases expire.
Our operating results and distributable cash flow would be adversely affected if a significant number of our customers were unable to meet their lease obligations. We are also subject to the risk that, upon the expiration of leases for space located in our properties, leases may not be renewed by existing customers, the space may not be re-leased to new customers or the terms of renewal or re-leasing (including the cost of required renovations or concessions to customers) may be less favorable to us than current lease terms. Our competitors may offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our customers, we may lose potential customers, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge to retain customers when our customers’ leases expire. In the event of default by a significant number of customers, we may experience delays and incur substantial costs in enforcing our rights as landlord, and we may be unable to re-lease spaces. A customer may experience a downturn in its business, which may cause the loss of the customer or may weaken its financial condition, resulting in the customer’s failure to make rental payments when due or requiring a restructuring that might reduce cash flow from the lease. In addition, a customer may seek the protection of bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws, which could result in the rejection and termination of such customer’s lease and thereby cause a reduction in our available cash flow.
We may acquire properties, which involves risks that could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
We have acquired properties and will continue to acquire properties, both through the direct acquisition of real estate and through the acquisition of entities that own the real estate and through additional investments in co-investment ventures that acquire properties. The acquisition of properties involves risks, including the risk that the acquired property will not perform as anticipated and that any actual costs for rehabilitation, repositioning, renovation and improvements identified in the pre-acquisition due diligence process will exceed estimates. When we acquire properties, we may face risks associated with a lack of market knowledge or understanding of the local economy, forging new business relationships in the area and unfamiliarity with local government and permitting procedures. Additionally, there is, and it is expected there will continue to be, significant competition for properties that meet our investment criteria as well as risks associated with obtaining financing for acquisition activities. The acquired properties or entities may be subject to liabilities, which may be without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based on ownership of any of these entities or properties, then we may have to pay substantial sums to settle it.
Our real estate development strategies may not be successful.
Our real estate development strategy is focused on monetizing land in the future through development of logistics facilities to hold for long-term investment, contribution or sale to a co-investment venture or third party, depending on market conditions, our liquidity needs and other factors. We may increase our investment in the development, renovation and redevelopment business and we expect to complete the build-out and leasing of our current development portfolio. We may also develop, renovate and redevelop properties within existing or newly formed co-investment ventures. The real estate development, renovation and redevelopment business includes the following significant risks:
we may not be able to obtain financing for development projects on favorable terms or at all;
we may explore development opportunities that may be abandoned and the related investment impaired;
11
we may not be able to obtain, or may experience delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other governmental permits and authorizations;
we may have construction costs, total investment amounts and our share of remaining funding that exceed our estimates and projects may not be completed, delivered or stabilized as planned due to defects or other issues;
we may not be able to attract third-party investment in new development co-investment ventures or sufficient customer demand for our product;
we may have properties that perform below anticipated levels, producing cash flow below budgeted amounts;
we may seek to sell certain land parcels and not be able to find a third party to acquire such land or the sales price will not allow us to recover our investment, resulting in impairment charges;
we may not be able to lease properties we develop on favorable terms or at all;
we may not be able to capture the anticipated enhanced value created by our value-added properties on expected timetables or at all;
we may experience delays (temporary or permanent) if there is public or government opposition to our activities; and
we may have substantial renovation, new development and redevelopment activities, regardless of their ultimate success, that require a significant amount of management’s time and attention, diverting their attention from our day-to-day operations.
We are subject to risks and liabilities in connection with forming co-investment ventures, investing in new or existing co-investment ventures, attracting third-party investment and investing in and managing properties through co-investment ventures.
At December 31, 2016, we had investments in real estate containing approximately 403 million square feet held through co-investment ventures, both public and private. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of available funds that we may invest in these ventures, and we may and currently intend to develop and acquire properties through co-investment ventures and investments in other entities when warranted by the circumstances. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to form new co-investment ventures, or attract third-party investment or that additional investments in new or existing ventures to develop or acquire properties will be successful. Further, there can be no assurance that we are able to realize value from such investments.
Our co-investment ventures involve certain additional risks that we do not otherwise face, including:
our partners may share certain approval rights over major decisions made on behalf of the ventures;
if our partners fail to fund their share of any required capital contributions, then we may choose to contribute such capital;
our partners might have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals that would affect our ability to operate the property;
the venture or other governing agreements often restrict the transfer of an interest in the co-investment venture or may otherwise restrict our ability to sell the interest when we desire or on advantageous terms;
our relationships with our partners are generally contractual in nature and may be terminated or dissolved under the terms of the agreements, and in such event, we may not continue to manage or invest in the assets underlying such relationships resulting in reduced fee revenues or causing a need to purchase such interest to continue ownership; and
disputes between us and our partners may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business and result in subjecting the properties owned by the applicable co-investment venture to additional risk.
We generally seek to maintain sufficient influence over our co-investment ventures to permit us to achieve our business objectives; however, we may not be able to continue to do so indefinitely. We have formed publicly traded investment vehicles, such as NPR and FIBRA Prologis, for which we serve as sponsor or manager. We have contributed, and may continue to contribute, assets into such vehicles. There is a risk that our managerial relationship may be terminated.
We are exposed to various environmental risks, including the potential impacts of future climate change, which may result in unanticipated losses that could affect our business and financial condition.
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner, developer or operator of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of removal or remediation of such substances could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator
knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of such hazardous substances. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages based on personal injury, property damage or other costs, including investigation and clean-up costs, resulting from the environmental contamination.
Environmental laws in some countries, including the U.S., also require that owners or operators of buildings containing asbestos properly manage and maintain the asbestos, adequately inform or train those who may come into contact with asbestos and undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, in the event that asbestos is disturbed during building renovation or demolition. These laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos. Some of our properties are known to contain asbestos-containing building materials.
In addition, some of our properties are leased or have been leased, in part, to owners and operators of businesses that use, store or otherwise handle petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances, creating a potential for the release of such hazardous or toxic substances. Furthermore, certain of our properties are on, adjacent to or near other properties that have contained or currently contain petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances, or upon which others have engaged, are engaged or may engage in activities that may release such hazardous or toxic substances. From time to time, we may acquire properties, or interests in properties, with known adverse environmental conditions for which we believe that the environmental liabilities associated with these conditions are quantifiable and that the acquisition will yield a superior risk-adjusted return. In connection with certain divested properties, we have agreed to remain responsible for, and to bear the cost of, remediating or monitoring certain environmental conditions on the properties.
We are also exposed to potential physical risks from possible future changes in climate. Our logistics facilities may be exposed to rare catastrophic weather events, such as severe storms or floods. If the frequency of extreme weather events increases due to climate change, our exposure to these events could increase. We do not currently consider ourselves to be exposed to regulatory risks related to climate change, as our operations generally do not emit a significant amount of greenhouse gases. However, we may be adversely impacted as a real estate developer in the future by potential impacts to the supply chain or stricter energy efficiency standards for buildings. We cannot give any assurance that other such conditions do not exist or may not arise in the future. The presence of such substances on our real estate properties could adversely affect our ability to lease, develop or sell such properties or to borrow using such properties as collateral, and this may have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition, and in particular, our distributable cash flow.
Our insurance coverage does not include all potential losses.
We and our unconsolidated co-investment ventures carry insurance coverage including property damage and rental loss insurance resulting from certain perils such as fire and additional perils as covered under an extended coverage policy, namely windstorm, flood, earthquake and terrorism; commercial general liability insurance; and environmental insurance, as appropriate for the markets where each of our properties and business operations are located. The insurance coverage contains policy specifications and insured limits customarily carried for similar properties, business activities and markets. We believe our properties and the properties of our unconsolidated co-investment ventures are adequately insured. Certain losses, however, including losses from floods, earthquakes, acts of war, acts of terrorism or riots, generally are not insured against or generally are not fully insured against because it is not deemed economically feasible or prudent to do so. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs with respect to one or more of our properties, we could experience a significant loss of capital invested and future revenues in these properties and could potentially remain obligated under any recourse debt associated with the property.
Furthermore, we cannot be sure that the insurance companies will be able to continue to offer products with sufficient coverage at commercially reasonable rates. If we experience a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds insured limits with respect to one or more of our properties or if the insurance companies fail to meet their coverage commitments to us in the event of an insured loss, then we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties, as well as the anticipated future revenues from those properties and, if there is recourse debt, then we would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the properties. Any such losses or higher insurance costs could adversely affect our business.
Risks Related to Financing and Capital
We may be unable to refinance our debt or our cash flow may be insufficient to make required debt payments.
We are subject to risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest. There can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance any maturing indebtedness, that such refinancing would be on terms as favorable as the terms of the maturing indebtedness, or that we will be able to otherwise obtain funds by selling assets or raising equity to make required payments on maturing indebtedness. If we are unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or meet our payment obligations, our business and financial condition will be negatively impacted and, if the maturing debt is secured, the lender may foreclose on the property securing such indebtedness. Our credit facilities and certain other debt bears interest at variable rates. Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense under these agreements.
Covenants in our credit agreements could limit our flexibility and breaches of these covenants could adversely affect our financial condition.
The terms of our various credit agreements, including our credit facilities, the indentures under which our senior notes are issued and other note agreements, require us to comply with a number of customary financial covenants, such as maintaining debt service
coverage, leverage ratios, fixed charge ratios and other operating covenants including maintaining insurance coverage. These covenants may limit our flexibility to run our business, and breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the instruments governing the applicable indebtedness. If we default under the covenant provisions and are unable to cure the default, refinance the indebtedness or meet payment obligations, our business and financial condition generally and, in particular, the amount of our distributable cash flow could be adversely affected.
Adverse changes in our credit ratings could negatively affect our financing activity.
The credit ratings of our senior unsecured notes and preferred stock are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position and other factors employed by the credit rating agencies in their rating analyses of us. Our credit ratings can affect the amount of capital we can access, as well as the terms and pricing of any debt we may incur. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings, and in the event our credit ratings are downgraded, we would likely incur higher borrowing costs and may encounter difficulty in obtaining additional financing. Also, a downgrade in our credit ratings may trigger additional payments or other negative consequences under our credit facilities and other debt instruments. Adverse changes in our credit ratings could negatively impact our business and, in particular, our refinancing and other capital market activities, our ability to manage debt maturities, our future growth and our development and acquisition activity.
At December 31, 2016, our credit ratings were A3 from Moody’s and A- from S&P, both with stable outlook. A securities rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating organization.
We depend on external sources of capital.
To qualify as a REIT, we are required each year to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends-paid deduction and by excluding any net capital gain) to our stockholders and we may be subject to tax to the extent our taxable income is not fully distributed. Historically, we have satisfied these distribution requirements by making cash distributions to our stockholders, but we may choose to satisfy these requirements by making distributions of cash or other property, including, in limited circumstances, our own stock. For distributions with respect to taxable years that ended on or before December 31, 2016, and in some cases declared as late as December 31, 2016, a REIT can satisfy up to 90% of the distribution requirements discussed above through the distribution of shares of our stock if certain conditions are met. Assuming we continue to satisfy these distribution requirements with cash, we may not be able to fund all future capital needs, including acquisition and development activities, from cash retained from operations and may have to rely on third-party sources of capital. Furthermore, to maintain our REIT status and not have to pay federal income and excise taxes, we may need to borrow funds on a short-term basis to meet the REIT distribution requirements even if the then-prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings. These short-term borrowing needs could result from differences in timing between the actual receipt of cash and inclusion of income for federal income tax purposes, or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt or amortization payments. Our ability to access debt and equity capital on favorable terms or at all depends on a number of factors, including general market conditions, the market’s perception of our growth potential, our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions and the market price of our securities.
Our stockholders may experience dilution if we issue additional common stock or units in the Operating Partnership.
Any additional future issuance of common stock or operating partnership units will reduce the percentage of our common stock and units owned by investors. In most circumstances, stockholders and unitholders will not be entitled to vote on whether or not we issue additional common stock or units. In addition, depending on the terms and pricing of any additional offering of our common stock or units and the value of the properties, our stockholders and unitholders may experience dilution in both book value and fair value of their common stock or units.
Income Tax Risks
The failure of Prologis, Inc. to qualify as a REIT would have serious adverse consequences.
Prologis, Inc. elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 1997. We believe we have operated Prologis, Inc. to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and believe that the current organization and method of operation comply with the rules and regulations promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code to enable Prologis, Inc. to continue to qualify as a REIT. However, it is possible that we are organized or have operated in a manner that would not allow Prologis, Inc. to qualify as a REIT, or that our future operations could cause Prologis, Inc. to fail to qualify. Qualification as a REIT requires us to satisfy numerous requirements (some annually and others on a quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex sections of the Internal Revenue Code for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. For example, to qualify as a REIT, Prologis, Inc. must derive at least 95% of its gross income in any year from qualifying sources. In addition, Prologis, Inc. must pay dividends to its stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of its taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding capital gains) and must satisfy specified asset tests on a quarterly basis. The provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury regulations regarding qualification as a REIT are more complicated for Prologis, Inc. because we hold assets through the Operating Partnership.
If Prologis, Inc. fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be required to pay federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless we are entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, Prologis, Inc. would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which it lost the qualification. If Prologis, Inc. lost its REIT status, our net earnings would be significantly reduced for each of the years involved.
14
Furthermore, we own a direct or indirect interest in certain subsidiary REITs that elected to be taxed as REITs under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. Provided that each subsidiary REIT qualifies as a REIT, our interest in such subsidiary REIT will be treated as a qualifying real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and any dividend income or gains derived by us from such subsidiary REIT will generally be treated as income that qualifies for purposes of the REIT gross income tests. To qualify as a REIT, the subsidiary REIT must independently satisfy all of the REIT qualification requirements. If such subsidiary REIT were to fail to qualify as a REIT, and certain relief provisions did not apply, it would be treated as a regular taxable corporation and its income would be subject to U.S. federal income tax. In addition, a failure of the subsidiary REIT to qualify as a REIT would have an adverse effect on the ability of Prologis, Inc. to comply with the REIT income and asset tests, and thus its ability to qualify as a REIT.
Certain property transfers may generate prohibited transaction income, resulting in a penalty tax on gain attributable to the transaction.
From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise dispose of some of our properties, including by contributing properties to our co-investment ventures. Under the Internal Revenue Code, any gain resulting from transfers of properties we hold as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is treated as income from a prohibited transaction subject to a 100% penalty tax. We do not believe that our transfers or disposals of property or our contributions of properties into our co-investment ventures are prohibited transactions. However, whether property is held for investment purposes is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. The Internal Revenue Service may contend that certain transfers or dispositions of properties by us or contributions of properties into our co-investment ventures are prohibited transactions. While we believe that the Internal Revenue Service would not prevail in any such dispute, if the Internal Revenue Service were to argue successfully that a transfer, disposition or contribution of property constituted a prohibited transaction, we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on any gain allocable to us from the prohibited transaction. In addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely affect our ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT.
Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect us.
In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made to the U.S. and foreign income tax laws applicable to investments in real estate, REITs, similar entities and investments. Additional changes are likely to continue to occur in the future, both in and outside of the U.S. and may impact our taxation or that of our stockholders.
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
ITEM 2. Properties
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
We invest in predominately logistics facilities. Our properties are typically used for distribution, storage, packaging, assembly and light manufacturing of consumer products. The vast majority of our operating properties are used by our customers for bulk distribution.
The following tables provide details of our consolidated operating properties, investment in land and development portfolio. We have also included operating property information below for our owned and managed portfolio. The owned and managed portfolio includes the properties we consolidate and the properties owned by our unconsolidated co-investment ventures reflected at 100% of the amount included in the ventures’ financial statements as calculated on a GAAP basis, not our proportionate share.
Included in the operating property information below for our consolidated operating properties are 646 buildings owned primarily by two co-investment ventures that we consolidate but of which we own less than 100% of the equity. No individual property or group of properties operating as a single business unit amounted to 10% or more of our consolidated total assets at December 31, 2016, or generated income equal to 10% or more of our consolidated gross revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Dollars and square feet in the following tables are in millions and items notated by ‘0‘ indicate an amount that rounds to less than one million:
Consolidated Operating Properties
Operating properties
Rentable Square Footage
Gross Book Value
Encumbrances (1)
Global Markets – U.S.:
Atlanta
16
712
128
17
812
Baltimore/Washington D.C.
518
68
704
Central Valley California
609
638
Central and Eastern Pennsylvania
1,103
56
1,104
Chicago
34
2,137
129
2,616
Dallas/Fort Worth
1,166
196
25
1,446
Houston
519
832
New Jersey/New York City
28
2,778
357
3,372
San Francisco Bay Area
1,630
1,972
Seattle
818
59
1,515
South Florida
1,136
1,501
Southern California
5,727
461
72
6,922
Regional Markets – U.S. (15 markets) (2)
3,546
584
70
3,608
Other Markets – U.S (5 markets)
106
Subtotal U.S.
309
22,458
2,305
Global Markets – Other Americas:
Brazil
505
Canada
635
145
Mexico:
Guadalajara
0
321
Mexico City
819
Monterrey
236
Regional Markets – Other Americas (3 markets)
Subtotal Other Americas
653
Global Markets – Europe:
Belgium
188
Czech Republic
35
663
France
78
2,141
Germany
120
1,648
Italy
528
Netherlands
1,281
Poland
1,338
Spain
537
U.K.
121
2,718
Regional Markets – Europe (3 markets)
47
960
Other Markets – Europe (1 market)
Subtotal Europe
Global Markets – Asia:
China
69
627
Japan
165
26
4,265
Singapore
Subtotal Asia
362
Total operating portfolio (3)
332
24,057
2,450
Value-added properties
117
192
Total operating properties
334
24,174
625
47,471
Consolidated – Investment in Land
Consolidated – Development Portfolio
Region
Acres
Estimated Build Out Potential
(square feet) (4)
Current Investment
TEI (5)
135
49
81
1,090
93
98
137
24
219
178
185
119
116
63
30
67
215
57
144
166
Regional Markets – U.S. (15 markets)
497
231
Other Markets – U.S (4 markets)
3,043
53
475
161
246
127
110
31
352
884
184
162
27
29
319
54
50
108
46
443
73
291
132
177
100
1,893
398
581
754
Total land and development portfolio
5,892
107
1,219
2,443
Certain of our consolidated properties are pledged as security under secured mortgage debt and assessment bonds at December 31, 2016. For purposes of this table, the total principal balance of a debt issuance that is secured by a pool of properties is allocated among the properties in the pool based on each property’s investment balance. In addition to the amounts reflected here, we also have $173 million of encumbrances related to other real estate properties not included in Real Estate Operations. See Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for additional identification of the properties pledged.
(2)
No regional market within the U.S. represented more than 2% of the total gross book value of the consolidated operating properties. The regional markets within the U.S. by order of highest to lowest gross book value were: Las Vegas, Denver, Louisville, Orlando, Columbus, Reno, Nashville, Cincinnati, San Antonio, Portland, Indianapolis, Austin, Phoenix, Charlotte and Memphis.
(3)
Included in our consolidated operating properties are properties that we consider to be held for contribution and are presented as Assets Held for Sale or Contribution in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We include these properties in our operating portfolio as they are expected to be contributed to our co-investment ventures and remain in our owned and managed operating portfolio. At December 31, 2016, we had properties that were expected to be contributed to our co-investment ventures totaling $231 million aggregating 2.4 million square feet. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for further information on our Assets Held for Sale or Contribution.
(4)
Represents the estimated finished square feet available for lease upon completion of a building on existing parcels of land.
(5)
Represents the TEI when the property under development is completed and leased. This includes the cost of land and development and leasing costs. As noted in the table below, our current investment is $1.4 billion, leaving approximately $1.0 billion of costs remaining. At December 31, 2016, approximately 58% of TEI for the properties under development in the development portfolio were expected to be completed by December 31, 2017, and approximately 37% of TEI for the properties in the development portfolio were already completed but not yet stabilized. The remainder of our properties under development are expected to be completed before July 2018.
The following table summarizes our investment in consolidated real estate properties at December 31, 2016 (in millions):
Investment Before Depreciation
Operating properties, excluding assets held for sale or contribution
23,943
Development portfolio, including cost of land
1,432
Land
Other real estate investments (1)
525
Total consolidated real estate properties
27,119
Included in other real estate investments are: (i) non-logistics real estate; (ii) land parcels that are ground leased to third parties; (iii) our corporate office buildings; (iv) infrastructure costs related to projects we are developing on behalf of others; (v) costs related to future development projects, including purchase options on land and (vi) earnest money deposits associated with potential acquisitions.
LEASE EXPIRATIONS
We generally lease our properties on a long-term basis (with a weighted average lease term remaining of four years). The following table summarizes the lease expirations of our consolidated operating portfolio for leases in place at December 31, 2016 (dollars and square feet in millions):
NER
Number of Leases
Occupied Square Feet
Dollars
Percent of Total
Dollars Per Square Foot
2017
750
182
11.3
%
4.76
2018
827
15.3
5.01
2019
747
52
242
15.0
4.70
2020
568
176
10.9
5.24
2021
592
232
14.4
5.19
2022
281
160
9.9
5.05
2023
138
85
5.3
5.35
2024
77
3.5
5.67
2025
66
4.1
5.68
2026
2.8
6.35
Thereafter
75
7.5
6.20
4,144
315
1,612
100.0
5.15
Month to month
4,279
322
CO-INVESTMENT VENTURES
Included in our owned and managed portfolio are consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment ventures that hold investments in real estate properties, primarily logistics facilities that we also manage. Our unconsolidated co-investment ventures are accounted for under the equity method. The amounts included for the unconsolidated ventures are reflected at 100% of the amount included in the ventures’ financial statements as calculated on a GAAP basis, not our proportionate share. The following table summarizes our consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment ventures at December 31, 2016 (in millions):
Operating Properties
Square Feet
Gross
Book Value
Investment
in Land
Development Portfolio – TEI
Consolidated Co-Investment Ventures
U.S.:
Prologis North American Industrial Fund (“NAIF”)
2,438
Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture (“USLV”)
6,058
36
96
Totals
112
8,496
Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures
Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund (“USLF”)
4,704
Other Americas:
FIBRA Prologis
1,942
Prologis Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I
(“Brazil Fund”) and related joint ventures
2,447
130
Europe:
Europe Logistics Venture 1 (“ELV”) (1)
378
Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl (“PELP”)
3,769
Prologis European Properties Fund II (“PEPF II”)
4,881
Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund (“PTELF”) (1)
2,458
163
11,486
Asia:
Nippon Prologis REIT (“NPR”)
4,101
Prologis China Logistics Venture
559
734
4,660
23,297
207
899
In January 2017, we sold our investment in ELV to our fund partner and ELV contributed its properties to PTELF in exchange for equity interests.
For more information regarding our unconsolidated and consolidated co-investment ventures, see Notes 5 and 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we and our unconsolidated co-investment ventures are parties to a variety of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that, with respect to any such matters to which we are currently a party, the ultimate disposition of any such matter will not result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
MARKET INFORMATION AND HOLDERS
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “PLD.” The following table sets forth the high and low sale price of our common stock, as reported in the NYSE Composite Tape, and the declared dividends per share, for the periods indicated.
High
Low
Dividends
2016
First Quarter
44.26
35.25
0.42
Second Quarter
50.74
43.45
Third Quarter
54.87
48.46
Fourth Quarter
53.51
45.93
2015
47.56
41.15
0.36
44.48
37.03
42.49
36.26
0.40
43.69
38.66
Our future common stock dividends, if and as declared, may vary and will be determined by the Board upon the circumstances prevailing at the time, including our financial condition, operating results, estimated taxable income and REIT distribution requirements. These dividends, if and as declared, may be adjusted at the discretion of the Board during the year.
On February 10, 2017, we had approximately 529,345,000 shares of common stock outstanding, which were held of record by approximately 4,690 stockholders.
Stock Performance Graph
The following line graph compares the change in Prologis, Inc. cumulative total stockholder’s return on shares of its common stock from December 31, 2011, to the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Stock Index and the Financial Times and Stock Exchange NAREIT Equity REITs Index from December 31, 2011, to December 31, 2016. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 in our common stock and each of the indices on December 31, 2011, and, as required by the SEC, the reinvestment of all dividends. The return shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
This graph and the accompanying text are not “soliciting material,” are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference in any filing by the company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
At December 31, 2016, and 2015, we had 1.6 million shares of the Series Q preferred stock with a liquidation preference of $50 per share. Dividends payable per share were $4.27 for the years ended December 31, 2016, and 2015.
For more information regarding dividends, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
During 2016, we issued an aggregate of 1.9 million shares of common stock of Prologis, Inc. in connection with the redemption of common units of Prologis, L.P. During 2015, we issued common units and Class A Units of Prologis, L.P. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for more information. The issuance of the shares of common stock, common units and Class A Units was undertaken in reliance upon the exemption from registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, afforded by Section 4(a)(2) thereof.
SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
For information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans, see Notes 10 and 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
OTHER STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Common Stock Plans
Further information relative to our equity compensation plans will be provided in our 2017 Proxy Statement or in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table summarizes selected financial data related to our historical financial condition and results of operations for both Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P. (in millions, except for per share and unit amounts):
Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Operating Data:
Total revenues
2,533
2,197
1,761
1,750
1,961
Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation
of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest, net (1)
757
759
726
715
Consolidated net earnings (loss)
1,293
926
739
230
(106
)
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders
and unitholders – Basic:
Continuing operations (2)
2.29
1.66
1.25
(0.35
Discontinued operations (2) (3)
0.25
0.17
and unitholders – Basic
0.65
(0.18
and unitholders – Diluted:
Continuing operations
2.27
1.64
1.24
0.39
(0.34
Discontinued operations (3)
0.16
and unitholders – Diluted
0.64
Dividends per common share and distributions per common unit
1.68
1.52
1.32
1.12
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets
30,250
31,395
25,775
24,534
27,268
Total debt
10,608
11,627
9,337
8,973
11,749
FFO (4):
Reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to FFO:
Net earnings (loss) attributable to common stockholders
1,203
863
(81
Total NAREIT defined adjustments
534
299
504
633
Total our defined adjustments
(35
(15
(33
FFO, as modified by Prologis (4)
1,702
1,309
888
855
552
Total core defined adjustments
(302
(128
65
(42
262
Core FFO (4)
1,400
1,181
953
813
814
In 2012, this included impairment charges of $269 million.
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common unitholders for the Prologis, L.P. was $(0.34) and $0.16 for continuing operations and discontinued operations, respectively, in 2012. For all other years, the amounts for the Prologis, L.P. were the same as Prologis, Inc.
In 2014, the accounting standard changed for classifying and reporting discontinued operations and as such, none of our dispositions in 2016, 2015 or 2014 met the qualifications to be reported as discontinued operations.
FFO; FFO, as modified by Prologis and Core FFO are non-GAAP measures. See Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for our definition of our FFO measures and a complete reconciliation to net earnings.
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this report and the matters described under Item 1A. Risk Factors.
MANAGEMENT’S OVERVIEW
We believe the quality and scale of our global operating portfolio, the expertise of our team and the strength of our balance sheet give us unique competitive advantages. Our plan to grow revenues, earnings, NOI, cash flows and funds from operations is based on the following:
Rent Growth. We expect market rents to continue to grow over the next few years, albeit at a more modest pace, which we believe will be driven by demand for the location and quality of our properties. Because of the strong market rent growth in the last several years, even if market rents remain flat, our in-place leases have considerable room to rise back to market levels. We estimate that on an aggregate basis our leases are more than 10% below market, which when the lease is renewed, translates
into increased future earnings, NOI and cash flow, both on a consolidated basis and through the amounts we recognize from our unconsolidated co-investment ventures based on our ownership. This is reflected in the positive rent change on rollovers (when comparing the net effective rent of the new lease to the prior lease for the same space) on our owned and managed operating portfolio that we have experienced every quarter beginning in 2013 and which we expect to continue for several more years.
Value Creation from Development. We believe a successful development and redevelopment program involves maintaining control of well-positioned land. On the basis of our current estimates, our owned and managed land bank has the potential to support the development of $8.4 billion of TEI of logistics space. We believe the carrying value of our land bank is below its current fair value, and we expect to realize this value going forward primarily through development. During 2016, in our owned and managed portfolio, we stabilized development projects with a TEI of $2.5 billion. Post stabilization, we estimate the value of these buildings to be 25.5% above their book value or the cost to develop (defined as estimated margin and calculated using estimated yield and capitalization rates from our underwriting models). In addition, these properties will generate an increase in NOI as they are leased up and become occupied.
Economies of Scale from Growth in Assets Under Management. Over the last several years, we have invested in a variety of technologies that have allowed us to achieve efficiencies and increase our investments in real estate with minimal increases to general and administrative (“G&A”) expenses. We have increased our owned and managed real estate assets by 85 million square feet (or approximately 16%) over the last two years primarily through acquisitions and integrated the assets with only minimal increases in overhead related to property management and leasing functions. We will continue to leverage these technologies in order to further streamline our operations and reduce our costs as a percentage of assets under management, along with advanced data analysis to enhance decision making.
Summary of 2016
During the year ended December 31, 2016, operating fundamentals remained strong for our owned and managed portfolio and we ended the year with occupancy of 97.1%. See below for details of the operating and development activity of our Owned and Managed Portfolio. During 2016, we completed the following activities as further described in the footnotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements:
We generated net proceeds of $3.0 billion from the contribution and disposition of real estate assets. We recorded net gains of $354 million from dispositions to third parties, primarily in the U.S., and $267 million from property contributions, principally in Europe and Japan.
We earned promotes from PEP II, PTELF and USLV aggregating $96 million, of which $89 million was recorded in Strategic Capital Revenues, and $7 million was recorded in Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests.
We generated proceeds of $611 million and recorded gains of $136 million through the redemption of our investments in certain unconsolidated co-investment ventures.
We amended our global senior credit facility (the “Global Facility”) and increased the total borrowing capacity to $3.0 billion and extended the maturity until April 2020. This facility, along with our Japanese yen revolver, increased our total borrowing capacity, which was $3.3 billion at December 31, 2016.
We entered into an ¥120.0 billion ($1.0 billion at December 31, 2016) unsecured yen senior term loan agreement (the “Yen Term Loan”) and repaid our existing yen term loans. See Liquidity and Capital Resources section below for details of this transaction.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We evaluate our business operations based on the NOI of our two business reporting segments, Real Estate Operations and Strategic Capital. NOI by segment is a non-GAAP financial measure that is calculated using revenues and expenses directly from our financial statements. We consider NOI by segment to be an appropriate supplemental measure of our performance because it helps both management and investors to understand the core operations of our business.
Below is a reconciliation of our NOI by segment to Operating Income per the Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31 (in millions). Each segment’s NOI is reconciled to a line item in the Consolidated Financial Statements in the respective segment discussion below.
Real Estate Operations segment – NOI
1,655
1,376
1,087
Strategic Capital segment – NOI
104
General and administrative expenses
(222
(217
(229
Depreciation and amortization expenses
(931
(881
(642
Operating income
668
380
320
See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on our segments and a reconciliation of each reportable business segment’s NOI to Operating Income and Earnings Before Income Taxes.
This operating segment principally includes rental revenues, rental recoveries and rental expenses recognized from our consolidated properties. We allocate the costs of our property management functions to the Real Estate Operations segment through Rental Expenses and the Strategic Capital segment through Strategic Capital Expenses based on the size of the relative portfolios as compared to our total owned and managed portfolio. The operating fundamentals in the markets in which we operate continue to improve, which has positively affected both the rental rates and occupancy and also has fueled development activity.
Below are the components of Real Estate Operations revenues, expenses and NOI for the years ended December 31 (in millions), derived directly from line items in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Rental revenues
1,735
1,536
1,179
Rental recoveries
486
437
349
Development management and other revenues
Rental expenses
(569
(544
(430
Other expenses
(14
(67
(24
Real Estate Operations – NOI
Real Estate Operations revenues, expenses and NOI are impacted by capital deployment activities, occupancy and changes in rental rates. The following items highlight the key changes in NOI for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
Change in
2016 from 2015
2015 from 2014
Acquisitions (1)
194
279
Rent rate and occupancy growth (2)
89
Development activity (3)
Contributions and dispositions
(91
(98
Other (4)
48
Total change in Real Estate Operations – NOI
289
The impact from acquisitions in 2016 from 2015 was primarily due to the acquisition of the real estate assets and operating platform of KTR Capital Partners and its affiliates (“KTR”) in May 2015, which generated an additional $152 million of net revenues, including a decrease of $25 million acquisition costs in 2016.
The impact from acquisitions in 2015 from 2014 included the KTR transaction in 2015 and the consolidation of NAIF in 2014. KTR included an additional $176 million of net revenues, which was slightly offset by $25 million in acquisition costs.
In the fourth quarter of 2014, we consolidated our co-investment venture NAIF, which increased NOI $153 million in 2015 from 2014.
Approximately 45% and 34% of KTR and NAIF activity, respectively, is offset in Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests attributable to our venture partner’s share. See Note 3 in the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on the KTR transaction and NAIF consolidation.
Rent rate growth is a combination of the turnover of existing leases and increases in rental rates from contractual rent increases on existing leases. If a lease has a contractual rent increase that is not known at the time the lease is signed, such as the consumer price index or a similar metric, the rent increase is not included in rent leveling and therefore, would impact the rental revenues we recognize. We have experienced an increase in rental rates on turnover of existing leases every quarter beginning in 2013 that has resulted in higher average rental rates in our portfolio and increased rental revenues and NOI as those leases commenced.
We have had a steady increase in properties that have been completed and leased from 2014 to 2016.
Other items increased NOI in 2016, compared to 2015, such as additional property tax expense recoveries, a reduction of noncash adjustments for the amortization of above or below market leases and decreases in non-recoverable expenses.
Below are key operating metrics of our consolidated operating portfolio for the years ended December 31:
This operating segment includes revenues from asset management and other fees as well as promotes earned for services performed for our unconsolidated co-investment ventures. Revenues associated with the Strategic Capital segment fluctuate because of the size of co-investment ventures under management, the transactional activity in the ventures and the timing of promotes. These revenues are reduced generally by the direct costs associated with the asset management and property-level management for the properties owned by these ventures. We allocate the costs of our property management functions to the Strategic Capital segment through Strategic Capital Expenses and to the Real Estate Operations segment through Rental Expenses based on the size of the relative portfolios as compared to our total owned and managed portfolio.
Below are the components of Strategic Capital revenues, expenses and NOI for the years ended December 31, derived directly from the line items in the Consolidated Financial Statements (in millions):
Strategic capital revenues
295
210
220
Strategic capital expenses
(129
(108
(116
Strategic Capital – NOI
Below is additional detail of our Strategic Capital revenues, expenses and NOI for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
U.S. (1):
Asset management and other fees
Leasing commissions, acquisition and other transaction fees
Promotes (2)
Strategic capital expenses (3)
(41
(46
(2
Other Americas (4):
(10
(9
84
71
(43
(27
(30
143
86
(31
In 2014, we acquired a controlling interest in our co-investment venture NAIF. See Notes 3 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on this venture.
The promotes represent the third parties’ share based on the venture’s cumulative returns to the investors over the last three years. Approximately 40% of promote revenues are paid as a combination of cash and stock awards pursuant to the terms of the Prologis Promote Plan and expensed through Strategic Capital Expenses.
This includes compensation and personnel costs for employees who are located in the U.S. but also support other regions.
In 2014, we formed the co-investment venture FIBRA Prologis. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on this venture.
The following real estate investments were held through our unconsolidated co-investment ventures at December 31 (dollars and square feet in millions):
Number of ventures
Number of properties owned
369
391
392
Square feet
4,238
4,408
4,403
213
205
198
2,793
2,482
2,653
700
688
636
159
148
10,853
11,343
11,440
5,173
4,320
4,120
Total:
1,367
1,350
1,278
277
261
23,057
22,553
22,616
See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our unconsolidated co-investment ventures.
G&A Expenses
G&A expenses increased $5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same time period in 2015, primarily due to increased compensation, including equity-based compensation awards. G&A expenses decreased $12 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to the same time period in 2014, primarily due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the British pound sterling, euro and Japanese yen.
We capitalize certain costs directly related to our development and leasing activities. Capitalized G&A expenses included salaries and related costs, as well as other G&A costs. The following table summarizes capitalized G&A amounts for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
Building and land development activities
Leasing activities
Operating building improvements and other
Total capitalized G&A expenses
101
87
Capitalized salaries and related costs as a percent of total salaries and related costs
26.0
27.6
23.9
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
The following table highlights the key changes in depreciation and amortization expenses for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
Acquisition of properties (1)
269
Development properties placed into service
Disposition and contribution of properties
(45
(56
Other
Total change in depreciation and amortization expenses
238
The increase in 2015 from 2014 included the KTR transaction and the consolidation of NAIF.
Our Owned and Managed Properties
We manage our business on an owned and managed basis, which includes properties wholly owned by us or owned by one of our co-investment ventures. We review our operating fundamentals on an owned and managed basis. We believe reviewing these fundamentals this way allows management to understand the entire impact to the financial statements, as it will affect both the Real Estate Operations and Strategic Capital segments, as well as the net earnings we recognize from our unconsolidated co-investment ventures based on our ownership share. We do not control the unconsolidated co-investment ventures for purposes of GAAP and the presentation of the ventures’ operating information does not represent a legal claim to such items.
Our owned and managed portfolio includes operating properties and does not include properties under development or held for sale to third parties and was as follows at December 31 (square feet in millions):
Number of Properties
Square
Feet
Percentage Occupied
Consolidated
1,777
97.0
1,872
97.1
1,605
282
96.4
Unconsolidated
1,359
290
97.2
1,331
273
96.7
1,248
255
95.9
3,203
607
96.9
2,853
96.1
Operating Activity
Below is information summarizing the leasing activity of our owned and managed operating portfolio for the years ended December 31:
We retained at least 80% of our customers, based on the total square feet of leases signed, for each year during the three-year period ended December 31, 2016.
Turnover costs represent the obligations incurred in connection with the signing of a lease, including leasing commissions and tenant improvements.
Capital Expenditures
We capitalize costs incurred in developing, renovating, rehabilitating and improving our properties as part of the investment basis. The following table summarizes our capital expenditures on previously leased buildings within our owned and managed portfolio for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
Property improvements
140
Tenant improvements
Leasing commissions
Total turnover costs
237
235
206
Total capital expenditures
402
346
Our proportionate share of capital expenditures based on ownership (1)
257
245
We calculated our proportionate share of capital expenditures by applying our ownership percentage of each co-investment venture on an entity-by-entity basis to the capital expenditures each period.
Development Start Activity
The following table summarizes development starts for the years ended December 31 (dollars and square feet in millions):
2016 (1)
Number of new development projects during the period
TEI
2,181
2,247
2,034
Our proportionate share of TEI (2)
1,809
1,815
1,792
Percentage of build-to-suits based on TEI
35.6
43.6
32.6
We expect all of our properties under development at December 31, 2016, to be completed before July 2018.
We calculate our proportionate share of TEI by applying our ownership percentage of each co-investment venture on an entity-by-entity basis to the TEI of each period.
Development Stabilization Activity
The following table summarizes development stabilization activity for the years ended December 31 (dollars and square feet in millions):
Number of development projects stabilized during the period
2,510
1,848
1,105
Our proportionate share of TEI (1)
2,155
1,640
955
Weighted average expected yield on TEI (2)
6.9
7.4
7.7
Estimated value at completion
3,150
2,434
1,360
Our proportionate share of estimated value at completion (1)
2,726
2,173
1,191
Estimated weighted average margin
25.5
31.8
23.0
We calculate our proportionate share of TEI and estimated value by applying our ownership percentage of each co-investment venture on an entity-by-entity basis to the TEI of each period.
We calculate the weighted average expected yield on TEI as estimated NOI assuming stabilized occupancy divided by TEI.
For information on our development portfolio at December 31, 2016, see Item 2. Properties.
Same Store Analysis
We evaluate the operating performance of the operating properties we own and manage using a “same store” analysis because the population of properties in this analysis is consistent from period to period, thereby eliminating the effects of changes in the composition of the portfolio on performance measures. We include properties from our owned and managed portfolio in our same store analysis. We have defined the same store portfolio, for the three months ended December 31, 2016, as those properties that were in operation at January 1, 2015, and have been in operation throughout the same three-month periods in both 2016 and 2015 (including development properties that have been completed and available for lease). We have removed all properties that were disposed of to a third party or were classified as held for sale to a third party from the population for both periods. We believe the factors that affect rental revenues, rental expenses and NOI in the same store portfolio are generally the same as for the total operating portfolio. To derive an appropriate
measure of period-to-period operating performance, we remove the effects of foreign currency exchange rate movements by using the recent period end exchange rate to translate from local currency into the U.S. dollar, for both periods.
Same store is a commonly used measure in the real estate industry. Our same store measures are non-GAAP financial measures that are calculated beginning with rental revenues, rental recoveries and rental expenses from the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. As our same store measures are non-GAAP financial measures, they have certain limitations as analytical tools and may vary among real estate companies. As a result, we provide a reconciliation from our financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP to same store property NOI with explanations of how these metrics are calculated.
The following is a reconciliation of our consolidated rental revenues, rental recoveries, rental expenses and property NOI for the full year, as included in the Consolidated Statements of Income and within Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, to the respective amounts in our same store portfolio analysis for the three months ended December 31 (dollars in millions):
Three Months Ended
March 31,
June 30,
September 30,
December 31,
Full Year
426
436
125
124
(147
(141
(140
Property NOI
407
405
421
419
1,652
325
418
435
94
115
(127
(126
(151
292
336
393
408
1,429
Three Months Ended December 31,
Percentage Change
Rental Revenues (1) (2)
Consolidated:
Rental revenues (per the quarterly information table above)
Rental recoveries (per the quarterly information table above)
Consolidated adjustments to derive same store results:
Rental revenues and recoveries of properties not in the same store portfolio –
properties developed, acquired and sold to third parties during the period
and land subject to ground leases
(168
(177
Effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other
(1
Unconsolidated co-investment ventures – rental revenues
423
Same store portfolio – rental revenues (2)
805
2.7
Rental Expenses (1) (3)
Rental expenses (per the quarterly information table above)
141
151
Rental expenses of properties not in the same store portfolio – properties
developed, acquired and sold to third parties during the period and
land subject to ground leases
(52
Unconsolidated co-investment ventures – rental expenses
99
97
Same store portfolio – rental expenses (3)
208
203
2.5
NOI (1)
Property NOI (per the quarterly information table above)
Property NOI of properties not in the same store portfolio – properties
(122
(125
(7
Unconsolidated co-investment ventures – property NOI
337
326
Same store portfolio – NOI
619
602
We include 100% of the Same Store NOI from the properties in our same store portfolio. During the periods presented, certain properties owned by us were contributed to a co-investment venture and are included in the same store portfolio. Neither our consolidated results nor those of the co-investment ventures, when viewed individually, would be comparable on a same store
basis because of the changes in composition of the respective portfolios from period to period (e.g. the results of a contributed property are included in our consolidated results through the contribution date and in the results of the unconsolidated entities subsequent to the contribution date).
We exclude the net termination and renegotiation fees from our same store rental revenues to allow us to evaluate the growth or decline in each property’s rental revenues without regard to items that are not indicative of the property’s recurring operating performance. Net termination and renegotiation fees represent the gross fee negotiated to allow a customer to terminate or renegotiate their lease, offset by the write-off of the asset recorded due to the adjustment to straight-line rents over the lease term. The adjustments to remove these items are included in “effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other” in this table.
Rental expenses include the direct operating expenses of the property such as property taxes, insurance and utilities. In addition, we include an allocation of the property management expenses for our direct-owned properties based on the property management services provided to each property (generally, based on a percentage of revenues). On consolidation, these amounts are eliminated and the actual costs of providing property management services are recognized as part of our consolidated rental expenses. These expenses fluctuate based on the level of properties included in the same store portfolio and any adjustment is included as “effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other” in this table.
Other Components of Income (Expense)
Earnings from Unconsolidated Entities, Net
We recognized net earnings from unconsolidated entities that are accounted for using the equity method of $206 million, $159 million and $134 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The earnings we recognize can be impacted by: (i) variances in revenues and expenses of each venture; (ii) the size and occupancy rate of the portfolio of properties owned by each venture; (iii) gains or losses from the dispositions of properties; (iv) our ownership interest in each venture; and (v) fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates used to translate our share of net earnings to U.S. dollars.
See the discussion of our co-investment ventures above in the Strategic Capital segment discussion and in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a further breakdown of our share of net earnings recognized.
Interest Expense
The following table details our net interest expense for the year ended December 31 (dollars in millions):
Gross interest expense
383
394
Amortization of premium, net and debt issuance costs
(32
(8
Capitalized amounts
(65
(61
Net interest expense
303
301
Weighted average effective interest rate
3.3
4.2
Gross interest expense decreased in 2016, compared with 2015, principally from lower outstanding debt balances and borrowing costs during the periods. Our debt decreased by $1.0 billion from December 31, 2015, to December 31, 2016, primarily from the repayment of the senior term loan related to the KTR transaction with proceeds from contributions and dispositions. Gross interest expense increased in 2015, compared with 2014, due to higher debt driven by the KTR transaction, offset somewhat by a decrease in interest rates and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a further breakdown of gross interest expense, amortization and capitalized amounts included in net interest expense. See also the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for further discussion of our debt and borrowing costs.
Gains on Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Net
Over the last three years, we have contributed properties, generally that we had developed, to our co-investment ventures in Europe, Japan and Mexico, as included in the table below. We recognize a gain to the extent of the third party ownership in the venture acquiring the property. In 2014, our contribution activity included the properties that we contributed to FIBRA Prologis upon its formation.
In addition, we have sold properties to third parties, generally from our operating portfolio in the U.S. These dispositions have supported our strategic objective of owning a portfolio of high-quality properties in the most active centers of commerce.
We utilize the proceeds from both contributions and dispositions to fund our capital investments.
The following table details our gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest, net for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
Contributions to unconsolidated co-investment ventures
Number of properties
126
Net gains on contributions
267
149
Dispositions to third parties
136
Net gains on dispositions
354
610
Total net gains on contributions and dispositions
621
Gains on redemptions of investments in co-investment ventures
Gains on revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest, net (1)
201
Total gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation of equity
investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest, net
In 2014, we acquired the equity units from all but one partner in our co-investment venture NAIF, resulting in the acquisition of a controlling interest. This resulted in us gaining control over NAIF and recording a gain on the revaluation of our equity investment. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on this transaction.
See Notes 4 and 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the gains we recognized.
Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses), Net
The following table details our foreign currency and derivative gains (losses), net included in earnings for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
Realized foreign currency and derivative gains (losses):
Gains on the settlement of unhedged derivative transactions
Losses on the settlement of transactions with third parties
(3
(4
Total realized foreign currency and derivative gains
Unrealized foreign currency and derivative gains (losses), net:
Gains on the change in fair value of unhedged derivative transactions
Losses on remeasurement of certain assets and liabilities (1)
(20
Gains (losses) on embedded derivative, including amortization (settled March 2015)
(28
Total unrealized foreign currency and derivative gains (losses), net
(21
Total foreign currency and derivative gains (losses), net
(18
These gains or losses were primarily related to the remeasurement of assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity, such as short-term intercompany loans between the U.S. parent and certain consolidated subsidiaries, debt and tax receivables and payables.
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our foreign currency and derivative policies and Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our derivative transactions.
Gains (Losses) on Early Extinguishment of Debt, Net
We repurchased portions of several series of senior notes, senior exchangeable notes and secured mortgage debt that resulted in the recognition of a gain of $2 million in 2016 and losses of $86 million and $165 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. As a result of these transactions, we reduced our effective interest rate and lengthened the maturities of our debt. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our debt repurchases.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
We recognize current income tax expense for income taxes incurred by our taxable REIT subsidiaries, state and local income taxes and taxes incurred in the foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. Our current income tax expense fluctuates from period to period based primarily on the timing of our taxable income. Deferred income tax expense (benefit) is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences and the utilization of net operating losses generated in prior years that had been previously recognized as deferred income tax assets in taxable subsidiaries operating in the U.S. or in foreign jurisdictions.
The following table summarizes our income tax expense (benefit) for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
Current income tax expense:
Income tax expense
Income tax expense on dispositions
Income tax expense on dispositions related to acquired tax liabilities
Total current income tax expense
60
Deferred income tax expense (benefit):
Income tax benefit
(5
(57
Income tax benefit on dispositions related to acquired tax liabilities
Total deferred income tax benefit
(87
Total income tax expense (benefit)
(26
Our income taxes are discussed in more detail in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
This amount represents the third-party investors’ share of the earnings generated in consolidated entities in which we do not own 100% of the equity, reduced by the third party share of fees or promotes payable to us and earned during the period.
The following table summarizes net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
Prologis North American Industrial Fund
Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture (1)
Other consolidated entities (2)
91
Prologis, L.P. net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
Limited partners in Prologis, L.P.
Prologis, Inc. net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
83
103
USLV completed the KTR transaction in May 2015; approximately seven months of operating activity were included in 2015, offset by third-party share of acquisition costs and an acquisition fee payable to us.
In 2014, we recognized net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests in Prologis Mexico Fondo Logistico of $65 million because of the FIBRA Prologis transaction, primarily related to the third-party investors’ share of the gain on disposition and the net deferred income tax benefit.
See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our consolidated co-investment ventures.
Other Comprehensive Loss
During 2016, 2015 and 2014, we recorded net losses in our Statement of Comprehensive Income related to foreign currency translations of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars upon consolidation. These losses were principally due to the weakening of the Brazilian real, British pound sterling, euro and Japanese yen to the U.S. dollar.
During 2016, 2015 and 2014, we also recorded unrealized losses in our Statement of Comprehensive Income, related to the change in fair value of our cash flow hedges and our share of derivatives in our unconsolidated co-investment ventures.
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our foreign currency and derivative policies and Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our derivative transactions and other comprehensive losses.
Other Matters
On June 23, 2016, the U.K. passed a referendum to leave the European Union. Our key business driver remains intact, and we have not seen, nor do we anticipate, a material operational or financial impact. Our customers in the U.K. principally serve domestic consumers and we do not expect the decision to leave the European Union will materially change the consumption habits that drive our business. At December 31, 2016, our owned and managed U.K. operating portfolio was 99.5% leased and had a weighted average lease term of nine years with only 4.6% of the leases expiring in 2017. The U.K. portfolio contributes approximately 4% of our share of annual NOI through consolidated entities and co-investment ventures.
A majority of the properties we acquired were subjected to environmental reviews either by us or the previous owners. While some of these assessments have led to further investigation and sampling, none of the environmental assessments have revealed an
environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. See Note 17 in the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about environmental liabilities.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
We consider our ability to generate cash from operating activities, distributions from our co-investment ventures, dispositions of properties and from available financing sources to be adequate to meet our anticipated future development, acquisition, operating, debt service, dividend and distribution requirements.
Near-Term Principal Cash Sources and Uses
In addition to dividends to the common and preferred stockholders of Prologis and distributions to the holders of limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership and our partners in the consolidated co-investment ventures, we expect our primary cash needs will consist of the following:
completion of the development and leasing of the properties in our consolidated development portfolio (at December 31, 2016, 89 properties in our development portfolio were 59.8% leased with a current investment of $1.4 billion and a TEI of $2.4 billion when completed and leased, leaving $1.0 billion remaining to be spent);
development of new properties for long-term investment, including the acquisition of land in certain markets;
capital expenditures and leasing costs on properties in our operating portfolio;
repayment of debt and scheduled principal payments of $622 million in 2017;
additional investments in current unconsolidated entities or new investments in future unconsolidated co-investment ventures;
acquisition of operating properties or portfolios of operating properties (depending on market and other conditions) for direct, long-term investment in our consolidated portfolio (this might include acquisitions from our co-investment ventures); and
repurchase of our outstanding debt or equity securities (depending on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors) through cash purchases, open-market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers or otherwise.
We expect to fund our cash needs principally from the following sources (subject to market conditions):
available unrestricted cash balances ($807 million at December 31, 2016);
property operations;
fees earned for services performed on behalf of the co-investment ventures, including promotes;
distributions received from the co-investment ventures;
proceeds from the disposition of properties, land parcels or other investments to third parties;
proceeds from the contributions of properties to current or future co-investment ventures;
proceeds from the sale of a portion of our investments in co-investment ventures;
borrowing capacity under our current credit facility arrangements discussed in the following section, other facilities or borrowing arrangements ($3.2 billion available at December 31, 2016); and
proceeds from the issuance of debt.
We may also generate proceeds from the issuance of equity securities, subject to market conditions.
Debt
The following table summarizes information about our debt at December 31 (dollars in millions):
Debt outstanding
Weighted average interest rate
3.2
Weighted average maturity in months
In the first quarter of 2016, we repaid the $400 million remaining balance on the senior term loan that was used to fund the KTR transaction with proceeds generated from the contributions of development properties to our co-investment ventures and proceeds generated from the disposition of certain nonstrategic properties to third parties.
In March 2016, we entered into an unsecured term loan agreement under which we could draw in Japanese yen in an aggregate amount not to exceed ¥11.2 billion that was scheduled to mature in March 2017. In the first quarter of 2016, we borrowed ¥11.2 billion ($100 million) on this term loan.
In April 2016, we amended the Global Facility and increased our aggregate borrowing capacity to $3.0 billion
In August 2016, we entered into the Yen Term Loan under which we can draw in Japanese yen in an aggregate amount not to exceed ¥120.0 billion ($1.0 billion at December 31, 2016) bearing interest at yen LIBOR plus 0.65%, of which ¥50.0 billion ($427 million at December 31, 2016) matures in August 2022 and ¥70.0 billion ($598 million at December 31, 2016) matures in August 2023. We may increase the borrowings up to ¥200.0 billion ($1.7 billion at December 31, 2016), subject to obtaining additional lender commitments. In the third quarter of 2016, we borrowed on the Yen Term Loan and used the proceeds to repay the previously outstanding Japanese yen term loans entered into in 2014, 2015 and 2016. The Yen Term Loan was fully drawn at December 31, 2016.
At December 31, 2016, we had credit facilities with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $3.3 billion, of which $3.2 billion was available for borrowing.
At December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants. These covenants include customary financial covenants for total debt, encumbered debt and fixed charge coverage ratios.
See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on our debt.
Equity Commitments Related to Certain Co-Investment Ventures
Certain co-investment ventures have equity commitments from us and our venture partners. Our venture partners fulfill their equity commitment with cash. We may fulfill our equity commitment through contributions of properties or cash. See the Cash Flow Summary below for more information about our investment activity in our co-investment ventures. For more information on equity commitments for our unconsolidated co-investment ventures, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Cash Flow Summary
The following table summarizes our cash flow activity for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
Net cash provided by operating activities
1,417
1,116
894
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
1,252
(4,789
(665
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
(2,125
3,596
(351
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities, exclusive of changes in receivables and payables, is impacted by the following significant activity:
Real estate operations. We receive the majority of our operating cash through net revenues of our Real Estate Operations segment. See our Results of Operations section above for further explanation of our Real Estate Operations segment. The revenues from this segment include noncash adjustments for straight-lined rent and amortization of above and below market leases of $94 million, $60 million and $14 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Strategic capital. We also generate operating cash through our Strategic Capital segment by providing management services to our unconsolidated co-investment ventures, including promotes. See our Strategic Capital Results of Operations section above for the key drivers of our strategic capital revenues and expenses. Included in the cash provided by operating activities for 2016 is $30 million of cash received from promotes, which represented the third-party share and was accrued as strategic capital revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015.
G&A expenses. We incurred $222 million, $217 million and $229 million of G&A costs in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Distributions from unconsolidated entities. In 2016, we adopted an accounting standard update that clarifies the classification methodology within the statement of cash flows for distributions received from equity method investments. We elected the nature of distributions approach, in which cash flows generated from the operations of an unconsolidated entity are classified as a return on investment (cash inflow from operating activities) and cash flows that are generated from property sales, debt refinancing or redemption of ownership interests are classified as a return of investment (cash inflow from investing activities).
Following our adoption of this standard, we recognized $287 million, $285 million and $295 million of distributions from our unconsolidated entities in Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Included in 2016 are distributions of $27 million that represented our share of promotes earned in 2015. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we reclassified $141 million and $177 million of distributions from our unconsolidated entities into Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities that were previously reported as Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on this adoption.
Equity-based compensation awards. We record equity-based compensation expenses in Rental Expenses in the Real Estate Operations segment, Strategic Capital Expenses in the Strategic Capital segment and G&A expenses. The total amounts expensed were $60 million, $54 million and $57 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Cash paid for interest and income taxes. We paid combined amounts for interest and income taxes of $352 million, $370 million and $364 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. See Note 9 and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on this activity.
Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
Real estate development. We invested $1.6 billion, $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, in real estate development and leasing costs for first generation leases. We have 60 properties under development and 29 properties that were completed but not stabilized at December 31, 2016, and we expect to continue to develop new properties as the opportunities arise.
Real estate acquisitions. In 2016, we acquired total real estate of $459 million, which included 776 acres of land and nine operating properties. In 2015, we acquired total real estate of $890 million, which included 690 acres of land and 52 operating properties, excluding the KTR transaction. In 2014, we acquired 1,040 acres of land and eight operating properties for a combined total of $612 million.
KTR transaction, net of cash received. In 2015, we acquired the real estate assets of KTR for a net cash purchase price of $4.8 billion through our consolidated co-investment venture USLV. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on the transaction.
Capital expenditures. We invested $268 million, $238 million and $213 million in our operating properties during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which included recurring capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions on existing operating properties that were previously leased.
Proceeds from contributions and dispositions. We generated cash from contributions and dispositions of real estate properties of $2.8 billion, $2.8 billion and $2.3 billion in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail about our contributions and dispositions.
Investments in unconsolidated entities. We invest cash in our unconsolidated co-investment ventures and other ventures, which represented our proportionate share. The ventures use the funds for the acquisition of operating properties, development and repayment of debt. The following table summarizes our investments in our unconsolidated co-investment ventures for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
Prologis Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I and related joint ventures
Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl
222
478
Prologis European Properties Fund II
Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund
Nippon Prologis REIT
Remaining unconsolidated co-investment ventures
Total co-investment ventures
228
446
Other unconsolidated joint ventures
266
756
See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on our unconsolidated co-investment ventures.
Purchase of a controlling interest. We paid net cash of $590 million to acquire a controlling interest in NAIF in 2014.
Return of investment. As discussed above, we adopted an accounting standard update in 2016 that clarifies the classification methodology within the statement of cash flows for distributions received from equity method investments. As a result, distributions generated from activities outside the operations of our unconsolidated entities, such as property sales, debt refinancing or redemptions of ownership interests, are reflected in Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities. We received distributions from unconsolidated co-investment ventures and other ventures as a return of investment of $777 million, $29 million and $84 million during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Included in this amount for 2016 is $611 million from the sale of a portion of our investments, and the remaining amount was from property dispositions within our unconsolidated co-investment entities. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we reclassified $141 million and $177 million, respectively, of distributions from our unconsolidated entities that were previously reported as Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities into Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities.
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable backed by real estate. In 2016, we received $203 million for the payment in full of notes receivable received in connection with dispositions of real estate to third parties in 2015. In 2014, we received $188 million for the payment in full of the notes receivable that originated in 2010 through the sale of a portfolio of properties. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about notes receivable.
Settlement of net investment hedges. We received net proceeds of $80 million, $128 million and $13 million from the settlement of net investment hedges during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our derivative activity.
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock.
o
We generated net proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our incentive plans, primarily from the exercise of stock options, of $40 million, $18 million and $26 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
We generated net proceeds of $72 million and $140 million from the issuance of 2 million shares and 3 million shares of common stock under our at-the-market program during 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Norges Bank Investment Management exercised a warrant (that we issued in connection with the formation of PELP) for $214 million in exchange for 6 million shares of Prologis common stock in 2014.
Dividends paid on common and preferred stock. We paid dividends of $893 million, $805 million and $672 million to our common and preferred stockholders during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Repurchase of preferred stock and units. We paid $28 million to repurchase shares of series Q preferred stock in 2014.
Noncontrolling interests contributions. Our partner in USLV made contributions in 2015 of $2.4 billion, primarily for the KTR transaction, and $446 million in 2014 related to the formation of the venture.
Noncontrolling interests distributions. Our consolidated ventures distributed $344 million, $216 million and $315 million to various noncontrolling interests in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, primarily due to dispositions of real estate. Included in these amounts were $37 million, $16 million and $2 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, of distributions to common limited partnership unitholders of the Operating Partnership.
Tax paid for shares withheld. In 2016, we adopted an accounting standard update that clarifies the classification methodology within the statement of cash flows for taxes paid to a tax authority by us when we withhold shares to cover employee withholding tax payments for certain stock compensation plans. As a result of the adoption, we reclassified payments of $12 million and $13 million from Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Net borrowings on credit facilities. We generated net proceeds of $33 million from our credit facilities in 2016. We made net payments of $8 million and $717 million in 2015 and 2014 respectively, on our credit facilities.
Repurchase and payments of debt. During 2016, we made payments of $1.6 billion on our outstanding term loans, $233 million on regularly scheduled debt principal payments and payments at maturity and repurchased and extinguished secured mortgage debt of $461 million. During 2015, we made payments of $1.0 billion on our outstanding term loans, $128 million on regularly scheduled debt principal payments and payments at maturity and repurchased and extinguished secured mortgage debt of $2.0 billion. During 2014, we made payments of $2.2 billion on our previous term loan, $102 million on regularly scheduled debt principal payments and payments at maturity and repurchased and extinguished senior notes and secured mortgage debt of $1.9 billion.
Proceeds from issuance of debt. In 2016, we issued $973 million of term loans and $397 million of secured mortgage debt and used the net proceeds for general corporate purposes. In 2015, we issued $1.5 billion of senior notes, $565 million of secured mortgage debt and $3.1 billion of term loans and used the net proceeds to fund our share of the purchase price for the KTR transaction, repurchased and redeemed senior notes and for general corporate purposes. In 2014, we issued €1.8 billion ($2.4 billion) of senior notes, $2.3 billion of term loans and $71 million of secured debt. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on debt.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Unconsolidated Co-Investment Venture Debt
We had investments in and advances to our unconsolidated co-investment ventures, at December 31, 2016, of $4.1 billion. These ventures had total third-party debt of $6.5 billion at December 31, 2016. This debt is primarily secured, is non-recourse to Prologis or the other investors in the co-investment ventures, matures and bears interest as follows (dollars in millions):
Weighted
There-
Disc/
Average
Book
Ownership
after
Prem
Interest Rate
Value
Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund
449
930
1,414
4.4%
14.9%
217
363
5.0%
45.9%
317
1,253
(11
1,775
3.1%
31.2%
233
361
671
2.2%
23.5%
254
1,063
1,616
0.9%
15.1%
111
180
(6
331
4.5%
15.0%
368
908
4,016
6,546
18,645
At December 31, 2016, we did not guarantee any third-party debt of the co-investment ventures. In our role as the manager or sponsor, we work with the co-investment ventures to refinance their maturing debt. There can be no assurance that the co-investment ventures will be able to refinance any maturing indebtedness on terms as favorable as the maturing debt, or at all. If the ventures are unable to refinance the maturing indebtedness with newly issued debt, they may be able to obtain funds by voluntary capital contributions from us and our partners or by selling assets. Certain of our ventures also have credit facilities, or unencumbered properties, both of which may be used to obtain funds.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Long-Term Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations at December 31, 2016 (in millions):
Payments Due by Period
Less than 1 Year
1 to 3 Years
3 to 5 Years
More than 5 Years
Debt obligations, other than credit facilities
1,812
2,641
5,523
10,598
Interest on debt obligations, other than credit facilities
340
562
403
373
1,678
Unfunded commitments on the development portfolio (1)
854
Operating lease payments
62
333
1,847
2,535
3,096
6,229
13,707
We had properties in our consolidated development portfolio (completed and under development) at December 31, 2016, with a TEI of $2.4 billion. The unfunded commitments presented include not only those costs that we are obligated to fund under construction contracts, but all costs necessary to place the property into service, including the estimated costs of tenant improvements, marketing and leasing costs that we expect to incur as the property is leased.
Distribution and Dividend Requirements
Our dividend policy on our common stock is to distribute a percentage of our cash flow to ensure that we will meet the dividend requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, relative to maintaining our REIT status, while still allowing us to retain cash to meet other needs such as capital improvements and other investment activities.
In 2016, we paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.42 per common share. In 2015, we paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.36 for the first two quarters and $0.40 per common share for the last two quarters. Our future common stock dividends, if and as declared, may vary and will be determined by the Board upon the circumstances prevailing at the time, including our financial condition, operating results and REIT distribution requirements, and may be adjusted at the discretion of the Board during the year.
In the fourth quarter of 2015, we issued a new class of common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership that are entitled to a quarterly distribution equal to $0.64665 per unit so long as the common units receive a quarterly distribution of at least $0.40 per unit. See Note 11 in the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on this new partnership unit class. We paid a distribution of $0.64665 in December 2016 and in December 2015 related to this new partnership unit class. We make distributions to the common limited partnership units outstanding at the same per unit amount as our common stock dividend.
At December 31, 2016, we had 1.6 million shares of one series of preferred stock outstanding – the “Series Q preferred stock,” with a liquidation preference of $50 per share. The annual dividend rate is 8.54% per share and dividends are payable quarterly in arrears. Pursuant to the terms of our preferred stock, we are restricted from declaring or paying any dividend with respect to our common stock unless and until all cumulative dividends with respect to the preferred stock have been paid and sufficient funds have been set aside for dividends that have been declared for the relevant dividend period with respect to the preferred stock.
Other Commitments
On a continuing basis, we are engaged in various stages of negotiations for the acquisition or disposition of individual properties or portfolios of properties.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the portrayal of an entity’s financial condition and results of operations and requires judgment on the part of management. Generally, the judgment requires management to make estimates and assumptions about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates are prepared using management’s best judgment, after considering past and current economic conditions and expectations for the future. Changes in estimates could affect our financial position and specific items in our results of operations that are used by stockholders, potential investors, industry analysts and lenders in their evaluation of our performance. Of the accounting policies discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, those presented below have been identified by us as critical accounting policies.
Consolidation
We consolidate all entities that are wholly owned and those in which we own less than 100% of the equity but control, as well as any variable interest entities in which we are the primary beneficiary. We evaluate our ability to control an entity including whether the entity is a variable interest entity and whether we are the primary beneficiary. We consider the substantive terms of the arrangement to identify which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. Investments in entities that we do not control but over which we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted
for using the equity method. Our ability to correctly assess our influence or control over an entity affects the presentation of these investments in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Business Combinations
Upon acquisition of real estate that constitutes a business, which includes acquiring a controlling interest in an entity previously accounted for using the equity method of accounting, we allocate the purchase price to the various components of the acquisition based on the fair value of each component. The components typically include buildings, land, intangible assets related to the acquired leases, debt, deferred tax liabilities and other assumed assets and liabilities. In an acquisition of multiple properties, we allocate the purchase price among the properties. The allocation of the purchase price is based on our assessment of estimated fair value and often is based on the expected future cash flows of the property and various characteristics of the markets where the property is located. The fair value may also include an enterprise value premium that we estimate a third party would be willing to pay for a portfolio of properties. In the case of an acquisition of a controlling interest in an entity previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting, this allocation may result in a gain or a loss. The initial allocation of the purchase price is based on management’s preliminary assessment, which may differ when final information becomes available. Subsequent adjustments made to the initial purchase price allocation are made within the allocation period, not to exceed one year. The use of different assumptions in the allocation of the purchase price of the acquired properties and liabilities assumed could affect the timing of recognition of the related revenues and expenses.
Revenue Recognition – Gains (Losses) on Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Strategic Capital Revenues
We recognize gains from the contributions and sales of real estate assets, generally at the time the title is transferred, consideration is received and we no longer have substantial continuing involvement with the real estate sold. In many of our transactions, an entity in which we have an equity investment will acquire a real estate asset from us. We make judgments based on the specific terms of each transaction as to the amount of the total profit from the transaction that we recognize given our continuing ownership interest and our level of future involvement with the entity that acquires the assets. In addition, we make judgments regarding recognition in earnings of certain fees and incentives earned for services provided to these entities based on when they are earned, fixed and determinable.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivative financial instruments can be designated as fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Accounting for derivatives as hedges requires that at inception, and over the term of the instruments, the hedged item and derivative qualify for hedge accounting. The rules and interpretations for derivatives are complex. Failure to apply this guidance correctly may result in all changes in fair value of the hedged derivative being recognized in earnings. We assess both at inception, and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are effective at offsetting changes in either the fair values or cash flows of the related underlying exposures. Any ineffective portion of a derivative financial instrument's change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. Derivatives not designated as hedges are used to manage our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations and variable interest rates but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements. The rules and interpretations for derivatives are complex. Failure to apply this guidance correctly may result in all changes in fair value of the hedged derivative being recognized in earnings. See Notes 2 and 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our derivative financial instrument policy and our derivative financial instruments.
Income Taxes
Significant management judgment is required to estimate our income tax liability for each taxable entity, the liability associated with open tax years that are under review, our REIT taxable income and our compliance with REIT requirements. Our estimates are based on interpretation of tax laws. We estimate our actual current income tax due and assess temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for book and tax purposes resulting in the recognition of deferred income tax assets and liabilities. These estimates may have an impact on the income tax expense recognized. Adjustments may be required by a change in assessment of our deferred income tax assets and liabilities; changes in assessments of the recognition of income tax benefits for certain nonroutine transactions; changes due to audit adjustments by federal, international and state tax authorities; our inability to qualify as a REIT; the potential for built-in gain recognition; changes in the assessment of properties to be contributed to taxable REIT subsidiaries and changes in tax laws. Adjustments required in any given period are included within income tax expense. We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities.
Recoverability of Real Estate Assets
We assess the carrying values of our respective long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable.
Recoverability of real estate assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. To review our real estate assets for recoverability, we consider current market conditions, as well as our intent with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. Our intent with regard to the underlying assets might change as market conditions change. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models, applying a capitalization rate to estimated NOI of a property, quoted market values and third-party appraisals, where considered necessary. The use of projected future cash flows is based on assumptions that are consistent with our estimates of future expectations and the
strategic plan we use to manage our underlying business. If our analysis indicates that the carrying value of a property that we expect to hold is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, we recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the current estimated fair value of the property. Assumptions and estimates used in the recoverability analyses for future cash flows, including market rents, discount rates and capitalization rates are complex and subjective. Changes in economic and operating conditions or our intent with regard to our investment that occurs subsequent to our impairment analyses could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment.
Capitalization of Costs
During the land development and construction periods (including renovating and rehabilitating), we capitalize interest, insurance, real estate taxes and certain general and administrative costs of the personnel performing development, renovations and rehabilitation if such costs are incremental and identifiable to a specific activity to get the asset ready for its intended use. The ability to specifically identify internal personnel costs associated with development and the determination of when a development project is substantially complete and capitalization must cease, requires a high degree of judgment and failure to accurately assess these costs and timing could result in the misstatement of asset values and expenses. Capitalized costs are included in the investment basis of real estate assets.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS/UNITHOLDERS (“FFO”)
FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that is commonly used in the real estate industry. The most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO is net earnings.
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines FFO as earnings computed under GAAP to exclude historical cost depreciation and gains and losses from the sales, along with impairment charges, of previously depreciated properties. We also consider the gains on revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest and the gain recognized from a partial sale of our investment to be similar as a gain from the sale of previously depreciated properties under the NAREIT definition of FFO. We exclude similar adjustments from our unconsolidated entities and the third parties’ share of our consolidated ventures.
Our FFO Measures
Our FFO measures begin with NAREIT’s definition and we make certain adjustments to reflect our business and the way that management plans and executes our business strategy. While not infrequent or unusual, the additional items we adjust for in calculating FFO, as modified by Prologis and Core FFO, both as defined below, are subject to significant fluctuations from period to period. Although these items may have a material impact on our operations and are reflected in our financial statements, the removal of the effects of these items allows us to better understand the core operating performance of our properties over the long term. These items have both positive and negative short-term effects on our results of operations in inconsistent and unpredictable directions that are not relevant to our long-term outlook.
We calculate our FFO measures based on our proportionate ownership share of both our unconsolidated and consolidated ventures. We reflect our share of our FFO measures for unconsolidated ventures by applying our average ownership percentage for the period to the applicable reconciling items on an entity by entity basis. We reflect our share for consolidated ventures in which we do not own 100% of the equity by adjusting our FFO measures to remove the noncontrolling interests share of the applicable reconciling items based on our average ownership percentage for the applicable periods.
These FFO measures are used by management as supplemental financial measures of operating performance and we believe that it is important that stockholders, potential investors and financial analysts understand the measures management uses. We do not use our FFO measures as, nor should they be considered to be, alternatives to net earnings computed under GAAP, as indicators of our operating performance, as alternatives to cash from operating activities computed under GAAP or as indicators of our ability to fund our cash needs.
We analyze our operating performance primarily by the rental revenues of our real estate and the revenues from our strategic capital business, net of operating, administrative and financing expenses. This income stream is not directly impacted by fluctuations in the market value of our investments in real estate or debt securities.
FFO, as modified by Prologis attributable to common stockholders and unitholders (“FFO, as modified by Prologis”)
To arrive at FFO, as modified by Prologis, we adjust the NAREIT defined FFO measure to exclude:
deferred income tax benefits and deferred income tax expenses recognized by our subsidiaries;
current income tax expense related to acquired tax liabilities that were recorded as deferred tax liabilities in an acquisition, to the extent the expense is offset with a deferred income tax benefit in earnings that is excluded from our defined FFO measure;
unhedged foreign currency exchange gains and losses resulting from debt transactions between us and our foreign consolidated subsidiaries and our foreign unconsolidated entities;
foreign currency exchange gains and losses from the remeasurement (based on current foreign currency exchange rates) of certain third party debt of our foreign consolidated subsidiaries and our foreign unconsolidated entities; and
mark-to-market adjustments associated with derivative financial instruments.
We use FFO, as modified by Prologis, so that management, analysts and investors are able to evaluate our performance against other REITs that do not have similar operations or operations in jurisdictions outside the U.S.
Core FFO attributable to common stockholders and unitholders (“Core FFO”)
In addition to FFO, as modified by Prologis, we also use Core FFO. To arrive at Core FFO, we adjust FFO, as modified by Prologis, to exclude the following recurring and nonrecurring items that we recognized directly in FFO, as modified by Prologis:
gains or losses from contribution or sale of land or development properties that were developed with the intent to contribute or sell;
income tax expense related to the sale of investments in real estate and third-party acquisition costs related to the acquisition of real estate;
impairment charges recognized related to our investments in real estate generally as a result of our change in intent to contribute or sell these properties;
gains or losses from the early extinguishment of debt and redemption and repurchase of preferred stock; and
expenses related to natural disasters.
We use Core FFO, including by segment and region, to: (i) assess our operating performance as compared to similar real estate companies and the industry in general, (ii) evaluate our performance and the performance of our properties in comparison with expected results and results of previous periods, relative to resource allocation decisions; (iii) evaluate the performance of our management; (iv) budget and forecast future results to assist in the allocation of resources; (v) provide guidance to the financial markets to understand our expected operating performance; and (v) evaluate how a specific potential investment will impact our future results.
Limitations on the use of our FFO measures
While we believe our modified FFO measures are important supplemental measures, neither NAREIT’s nor our measures of FFO should be used alone because they exclude significant economic components of net earnings computed under GAAP and are, therefore, limited as an analytical tool. Accordingly, these are only a few of the many measures we use when analyzing our business. Some of these limitations are:
The current income tax expenses and acquisition costs that are excluded from our modified FFO measures represent the taxes and transaction costs that are payable.
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets are economic costs that are excluded from FFO. FFO is limited, as it does not reflect the cash requirements that may be necessary for future replacements of the real estate assets. Furthermore, the amortization of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of logistics facilities are not reflected in FFO.
Gains or losses from non-development property acquisitions and dispositions or impairment charges related to expected dispositions represent changes in value of the properties. By excluding these gains and losses, FFO does not capture realized changes in the value of acquired or disposed properties arising from changes in market conditions.
The deferred income tax benefits and expenses that are excluded from our modified FFO measures result from the creation of a deferred income tax asset or liability that may have to be settled at some future point. Our modified FFO measures do not currently reflect any income or expense that may result from such settlement.
The foreign currency exchange gains and losses that are excluded from our modified FFO measures are generally recognized based on movements in foreign currency exchange rates through a specific point in time. The ultimate settlement of our foreign currency-denominated net assets is indefinite as to timing and amount. Our FFO measures are limited in that they do not reflect the current period changes in these net assets that result from periodic foreign currency exchange rate movements.
The gains and losses on extinguishment of debt that we exclude from our Core FFO, may provide a benefit or cost to us as we may be settling our debt at less or more than our future obligation.
The natural disaster expenses that we exclude from Core FFO are costs that we have incurred.
We compensate for these limitations by using our FFO measures only in conjunction with net earnings computed under GAAP when making our decisions. This information should be read with our complete Consolidated Financial Statements prepared under GAAP. To assist investors in compensating for these limitations, we reconcile our modified FFO measures to our net earnings computed under GAAP for years ended December 31 as follows (in millions).
FFO
Reconciliation of net earnings to FFO measures:
Net earnings attributable to common stockholders
Add (deduct) NAREIT defined adjustments:
Real estate related depreciation and amortization
900
618
Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate properties, net
(423
(501
(553
Reconciling items related to noncontrolling interests
(105
(78
Our share of reconciling items included in earnings from unconsolidated entities
186
NAREIT defined FFO
1,737
1,324
921
Add (deduct) our modified adjustments:
Unrealized foreign currency and derivative losses (gains), net
Deferred income tax benefit, net
Current income tax expense related to acquired tax liabilities
(23
FFO, as modified by Prologis
Adjustments to arrive at Core FFO:
Gains on dispositions of development properties and land, net
(334
(258
(173
Current income tax expense on dispositions
Acquisition expenses
Losses (gains) on early extinguishment of debt and repurchase of preferred stock, net
Core FFO
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to the impact of foreign exchange-related variability and earnings volatility on our foreign investments and interest rate changes. See our risk factors in Item 1A. Risk Factors, specifically: The depreciation in the value of the foreign currency in countries where we have a significant investment may adversely affect our results of operations and financial position and We may be unable to refinance our debt or our cash flow may be insufficient to make required debt payments. See also Notes 2 and 16 in the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for more information about our foreign operations and derivative financial instruments.
We monitor our market risk exposures using a sensitivity analysis. Our sensitivity analysis estimates the exposure to market risk sensitive instruments assuming a hypothetical 10% adverse change in exchange or interest rates at December 31, 2016. The results of the sensitivity analysis are summarized in the following sections. The sensitivity analysis is of limited predictive value. As a result, revenues and expenses, as well as our ultimate realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during a future period, hedging strategies at the time and the prevailing interest and foreign currency exchange rates.
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to foreign exchange-related variability of investments and earnings from our foreign investments. Foreign currency market risk is the possibility that our financial results or financial position could be better or worse than planned because of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. At December 31, 2016, after consideration of our derivative and nonderivative financial instruments, we had net equity of approximately $1.6 billion denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar representing 7.9% of total net equity. Based on our sensitivity analysis, a 10% reduction in exchange rates would cause a reduction of $161 million to our net equity.
At December 31, 2016, we had foreign currency forward contracts, which were designated and qualify as net investment hedges, with an aggregate notional amount of $146 million to hedge a portion of our investments in Canada and the U.K. On the basis of our sensitivity analysis, a weakening of the U.S. dollar against the British pound sterling or Canadian dollar by 10% would result in a $15 million negative change in our cash flows on settlement. In addition, we also have British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, euro and Japanese yen forward and option contracts, which were not designated as hedges, and have an aggregate notional amount of $457 million to mitigate risk associated with the translation of the projected earnings of our subsidiaries in Canada, Europe and Japan. A
weakening of the U.S. dollar against these currencies by 10% would result in a $46 million negative change in our net income and cash flows on settlement.
Interest Rate Risk
We also are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes on future earnings and cash flows. At December 31, 2016, we had $1.8 billion of variable rate debt outstanding, of which $1.5 billion was outstanding on our term loans, $279 million was outstanding on secured mortgage debt and $35 million was outstanding on our credit facilities. At December 31, 2016, we had interest rate swap agreements to fix $276 million (CAD $372 million) of our Canadian term loan. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we had weighted average daily outstanding borrowings of $126 million on our variable rate credit facilities. On the basis of our sensitivity analysis, a 10% adverse change in interest rates based on our average outstanding variable rate debt balances not subject to interest rate swap agreements during the period would result in additional annual interest expense of $2 million, which equates to a change in interest rates of 11 basis points.
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The Consolidated Balance Sheets of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P. at December 31, 2016, and 2015, the Consolidated Statements of Income of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P., the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P., the Consolidated Statements of Equity of Prologis, Inc., the Consolidated Statements of Capital of Prologis, L.P. and the Consolidated Statements Cash Flows of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P. for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, together with the reports of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, are included under Item 15 of this report and are incorporated herein by reference. Selected unaudited quarterly financial data are presented in Note 20 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
Controls and Procedures (The Parent)
Prologis, Inc. carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) at December 31, 2016. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms. Subsequent to December 31, 2016, there were no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2016, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting was conducted at December 31, 2016, based on the criteria described in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management determined that, at December 31, 2016, the internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2016, has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report which is included herein.
Limitations of the Effectiveness of Controls
Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting. The internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Controls and Procedures (The Operating Partnership)
Prologis, L.P. carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) at December 31, 2016. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms. Subsequent to December 31, 2016, there were no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting. The internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
ITEM 9B. Other Information
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to, including relevant sections in our 2017 Proxy Statement, under the captions entitled Board of Directors and Corporate Governance; Executive Officers; Executive Compensation; Director Compensation; Security Ownership; Equity Compensation Plans and Additional Information or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the relevant sections in our 2017 Proxy Statement, under the captions entitled Board of Directors and Corporate Governance; Executive Officers; Executive Compensation and Director Compensation or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the relevant sections in our 2017 Proxy Statement, under the captions entitled Security Ownership and Equity Compensation Plans or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the relevant sections in our 2017 Proxy Statement, under the caption entitled Board of Directors and Corporate Governance or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the relevant sections in our 2017 Proxy Statement, under the caption entitled Audit Matters or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules
The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules:
1. Financial Statements:
See Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule III on page 46 of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
2. Financial Statement Schedules:
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes or is not applicable.
(b) Exhibits: The Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Index to the Exhibits on pages 116 to 121 of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Financial Statements: See Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule III on page 46 of this report, which is incorporated by reference.
ITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary
INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE III
Page Number
Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P.:
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Capital
58
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Description of Business
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Note 3. Business Combination
Note 4. Real Estate
Note 5. Unconsolidated Entities
Note 6. Assets Held for Sale or Contribution
74
Note 7. Notes Receivable Backed by Real Estate
Note 8. Other Assets and Other Liabilities
Note 9. Debt
Note 10. Stockholders' Equity of Prologis, Inc.
80
Note 11. Partners' Capital of Prologis, L.P.
Note 12. Noncontrolling Interests
82
Note 13. Long-Term Compensation
Note 14. Income Taxes
Note 15. Earnings Per Common Share or Unit
Note 16. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies
92
Note 18. Business Segments
Note 19. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
95
Note 20. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Prologis, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Prologis, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for discontinued
operations as of January 1, 2014, on a prospective basis, due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-08.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, during 2016 the Company has changed its method for classifying distributions received from equity method investees in the statements of cash flows for all periods presented, on a retrospective basis, due to the early adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-15.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Prologis, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 14, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Prologis, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 14, 2017
The Partners
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, L.P. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Prologis, L.P.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for discontinued operations as of January 1, 2014, on a prospective basis, due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-08.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, during 2016 the Operating Partnership has changed its method for classifying distributions received from equity method investees in the statements of cash flows for all periods presented, on a retrospective basis, due to the early adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-15.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Prologis, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have audited Prologis, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Prologis, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Prologis, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Prologis, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and our report dated February 14, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
PROLOGIS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
ASSETS
Investments in real estate properties
27,119,330
27,521,368
Less accumulated depreciation
3,758,372
3,274,284
Net investments in real estate properties
23,360,958
24,247,084
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities
4,230,429
4,755,620
Assets held for sale or contribution
322,139
378,423
Notes receivable backed by real estate
32,100
235,050
Net investments in real estate
27,945,626
29,616,177
Cash and cash equivalents
807,316
264,080
Other assets
1,496,990
1,514,510
30,249,932
31,394,767
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
10,608,294
11,626,831
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
556,179
712,725
Other liabilities
627,319
634,375
Total liabilities
11,791,792
12,973,931
Equity:
Prologis, Inc. stockholders’ equity:
Series Q preferred stock at stated liquidation preference of $50 per share; $0.01 par value; 1,565 shares
issued and outstanding and 100,000 preferred shares authorized at December 31, 2016, and 2015
78,235
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 528,671 shares and 524,512 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2016, and 2015, respectively
5,287
5,245
Additional paid-in capital
19,455,039
19,302,367
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(937,473
(791,429
Distributions in excess of net earnings
(3,610,007
(3,926,483
Total Prologis, Inc. stockholders’ equity
14,991,081
14,667,935
Noncontrolling interests
3,467,059
3,752,901
Total equity
18,458,140
18,420,836
Total liabilities and equity
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues:
Rental
1,734,844
1,536,117
1,178,609
485,565
437,070
348,740
Strategic capital
294,552
210,362
219,871
Development management and other
18,174
13,525
13,567
2,533,135
2,197,074
1,760,787
Expenses:
568,870
544,182
430,289
128,506
108,422
115,430
General and administrative
222,067
217,227
229,332
Depreciation and amortization
930,985
880,373
642,461
14,329
66,698
23,467
Total expenses
1,864,757
1,816,902
1,440,979
668,378
380,172
319,808
Other income (expense):
Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net
206,307
159,262
134,288
Interest expense
(303,146
(301,363
(308,885
Interest and other income, net
8,101
25,484
25,768
Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation of equity investments
upon acquisition of a controlling interest, net
757,398
758,887
725,790
Foreign currency and derivative gains (losses), net
7,582
12,466
(17,841
Gains (losses) on early extinguishment of debt, net
2,484
(86,303
(165,300
Total other income
678,726
568,433
393,820
Earnings before income taxes
1,347,104
948,605
713,628
54,564
23,090
(25,656
Consolidated net earnings
1,292,540
925,515
739,284
Less net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
82,608
56,076
103,101
Net earnings attributable to controlling interests
1,209,932
869,439
636,183
Less preferred stock dividends
6,714
6,651
7,431
Loss on preferred stock repurchase
6,517
1,203,218
862,788
622,235
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic
526,103
521,241
499,583
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted
546,666
533,944
506,391
Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders – Basic
Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders – Diluted
Dividends per common share
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation losses, net
(135,958
(208,901
(171,401
Unrealized losses on derivative contracts, net
(1,349
(17,457
(6,498
Comprehensive income
1,155,233
699,157
561,385
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
(82,608
(56,076
(103,101
Other comprehensive loss (gain) attributable to noncontrolling interests
(8,737
35,266
13,237
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders
1,063,888
678,347
471,521
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Common Stock
Accumulated
Distributions
Number
Additional
in Excess of
Non-
Preferred
of
Par
Paid-in
Comprehensive
Net
controlling
Stock
Shares
Capital
Income (Loss)
Earnings
Interests
Equity
Balance at January 1, 2014
100,000
498,799
4,988
17,974,509
(435,675
(3,932,664
465,295
14,176,453
Effect of equity compensation plans
1,383
88,424
450
88,888
Issuance of stock in at-the-market
program, net of issuance costs
3,316
140,102
140,135
Repurchase of preferred sock
(21,765
639
(6,517
(27,643
Issuance of stock from exercise of
warrant
6,000
213,780
213,840
Formation of Prologis U.S. Logistics
Venture
13,721
442,251
455,972
Consolidation of Prologis North
American Industrial Fund
12,507
554,493
567,000
Capital contributions
14,464
Settlement of noncontrolling
interests
33,803
(36,243
(2,440
Foreign currency translation
losses, net
(167,950
(13,214
(181,164
Unrealized losses and amortization
on derivative contracts, net
(9,219
(9,242
Distributions and allocations
2,031
(671,495
(322,484
(991,948
Balance at December 31, 2014
509,498
5,095
18,467,009
(600,337
(3,974,493
1,208,090
15,183,599
1,475
57,454
26,234
83,703
1,662
71,532
71,548
Issuance of stock upon conversion
of exchangeable debt
11,872
502,613
502,732
Issuance of units related to KTR
transaction
181,170
Issuance of units related to other
acquisitions
371,570
2,355,596
(173,852
(35,049
(17,240
Reallocation of equity
202,812
(15,894
(186,918
Distributions and other
947
(805,535
(223,651
(1,028,239
Balance at December 31, 2015
524,512
2,282
91,191
26,483
117,697
Issuance of units related to
3,162
Conversion of noncontrolling
1,877
52,237
(52,256
Foreign currency translation gains
(losses), net
(144,730
8,772
Unrealized losses on derivative
contracts, net
(1,314
8,657
(8,657
587
(893,456
(345,919
(1,238,788
Balance at December 31, 2016
528,671
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Straight-lined rents and amortization of above and below market leases
(93,608
(59,619
(14,392
Equity-based compensation awards
60,341
53,665
57,478
(206,307
(159,262
(134,288
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
286,651
284,664
294,890
Net changes in operating receivables from unconsolidated entities
14,823
(38,185
(7,503
Amortization of debt premiums, net of deferred financing costs
(15,137
(31,841
(7,324
(757,398
(758,887
(725,790
(8,052
(1,019
22,571
Losses (gains) on early extinguishment of debt, net
(2,484
86,303
165,300
Deferred income tax benefit
(5,525
(5,057
(87,240
Increase in accounts receivable and other assets
(106,337
(64,749
(93
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities
26,513
4,426
(50,881
1,417,005
1,116,327
894,473
Investing activities:
Real estate development
(1,641,560
(1,339,904
(1,064,220
Real estate acquisitions
(458,516
(890,183
(612,330
KTR transaction, net of cash received
(4,809,499
Tenant improvements and lease commissions on previously leased space
(165,933
(154,564
(133,957
Nondevelopment capital expenditures
(101,677
(83,351
(78,610
Proceeds from dispositions and contributions of real estate properties
2,826,408
2,795,249
2,285,488
(265,951
(474,420
(756,416
Acquisition of a controlling interest in unconsolidated co-investment ventures, net of
cash received
(590,390
Return of investment from unconsolidated entities
776,550
29,406
84,135
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable backed by real estate
202,950
9,866
188,000
Proceeds from the settlement of net investment hedges
79,767
129,149
31,409
Payments on the settlement of net investment hedges
(981
(18,370
1,252,038
(4,789,232
(665,261
Financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
39,470
90,258
378,247
Distributions paid on common and preferred stock
(893,455
(804,697
(672,190
Repurchase of preferred stock
Noncontrolling interests contributions
2,168
2,355,367
468,280
Noncontrolling interests distributions
(343,550
(215,740
(315,426
Purchase of noncontrolling interests
(3,083
(2,560
Tax paid for shares withheld
(8,570
(12,298
(12,990
Debt and equity issuance costs paid
(20,123
(32,012
(23,420
Net proceeds from (payments on) credit facilities
33,435
(7,970
(717,369
Repurchase and payments of debt
(2,301,647
(3,156,294
(4,205,806
Proceeds from issuance of debt
1,369,890
5,381,862
4,779,950
(2,125,465
3,595,916
(350,807
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
(342
(9,623
(18,842
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
543,236
(86,612
(140,437
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
350,692
491,129
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
See Note 19 for information on noncash investing and financing activities and other information.
PROLOGIS, L.P.
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
Capital:
Partners’ capital:
General partner – preferred
General partner – common
14,912,846
14,589,700
Limited partners – common
150,173
186,683
Limited partners – Class A common
244,417
245,991
Total partners’ capital
15,385,671
15,100,609
3,072,469
3,320,227
Total capital
Total liabilities and capital
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
Losses on early extinguishment of debt, net
48,307
44,950
100,900
1,244,233
880,565
638,384
Less preferred unit distributions
Loss on preferred unit repurchase
Net earnings attributable to common unitholders
1,237,519
873,914
624,436
Weighted average common units outstanding – Basic
532,326
525,912
501,349
Weighted average common units outstanding – Diluted
Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders – Basic
Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders – Diluted
Distributions per common unit
(48,307
(44,950
(100,900
(12,601
32,862
12,666
Comprehensive income attributable to common unitholders
1,094,325
687,069
473,151
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL
General Partner
Limited Partners
Common
Class A Common
Units
Amount
2,000
13,611,158
1,767
48,209
417,086
2,201
Effect of equity compensation
plans
88,438
Issuance of units in exchange for
contribution of at-the-market
offering proceeds
Repurchase of preferred units
(435
(5,878
proceeds from exercise of
Formation of Prologis U.S.
Logistics Venture
(548
(12,666
(669,464
(2,100
(320,384
1,565
13,897,274
48,189
1,159,901
7,733
3,393
57,469
Issuance of units upon conversion
4,500
157
6,534
8,894
365,036
(1,520
(667
(32,862
(66
Reallocation of capital
186,918
(70,965
(115,953
(804,588
(16
(10,541
(5,752
(207,358
6,711
14,232
20,069
91,214
440
Conversion of limited partners units
52,256
(1,877
(1,457
(2,372
12,601
(13
(22
(12,414
3,757
(892,869
(14,247
(23,006
(308,666
5,323
PROLOGIS, L.P
Acquisition of a controlling interest in unconsolidated co-investment ventures, net of cash received
Proceeds from issuance of common partnership units in exchange for contributions from
Distributions paid on common and preferred units
(931,559
(820,989
(674,344
(306,297
(199,845
(313,272
(2,232
(2,163
Tax paid for shares of the Parent withheld
Debt and capital issuance costs paid
PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
Prologis, Inc. (or the “Parent”) commenced operations as a fully integrated real estate company in 1997, elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), and believes the current organization and method of operation will enable it to maintain its status as a REIT. The Parent is the general partner of Prologis, L.P. (or the “Operating Partnership”). Through the Operating Partnership, we are engaged in the ownership, acquisition, development and management of logistics properties in the world’s primary population centers and in those supported by extensive transportation infrastructure. Our current business strategy consists of two operating business segments: Real Estate Operations and Strategic Capital. Our Real Estate Operations segment represents the ownership and development of logistics properties. Our Strategic Capital segment represents the management of co-investment ventures and other unconsolidated entities. See Note 18 for further discussion of our business segments. Unless otherwise indicated, the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements apply to both the Parent and the Operating Partnership. The terms “the Company,” “Prologis,” “we,” “our” or “us” means the Parent and Operating Partnership collectively.
For each share of common stock or preferred stock the Parent issues, the Operating Partnership issues a corresponding common or preferred partnership unit, as applicable, to the Parent in exchange for the contribution of the proceeds from the stock issuance. At December 31, 2016, the Parent owned an approximate 97.42% common general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership and 100% of the preferred units in the Operating Partnership. The remaining approximate 2.58% common limited partnership interests, which include 8.9 million Class A common limited partnership units (“Class A Units”) in the Operating Partnership, are owned by unaffiliated investors and certain current and former directors and officers of the Parent. Each partner’s percentage interest in the Operating Partnership is determined based on the number of Operating Partnership units held, including the number of Operating Partnership units into which Class A Units are convertible, compared to total Operating Partnership units outstanding at each period end and is used as the basis for the allocation of net income or loss to each partner. At the end of each reporting period, a capital adjustment is made in the Operating Partnership to reflect the appropriate ownership interest for each of the common unitholders. These adjustments are reflected in the line items Reallocation of Equity in the Consolidated Statement of Equity and Reallocation of Capital in the Consolidated Statement of Capital.
As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Parent has complete responsibility and discretion in the day-to-day management and control of the Operating Partnership and we operate the Parent and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management of the Parent consists of the same members as the management of the Operating Partnership. These members are officers of the Parent and employees of the Operating Partnership or one of its subsidiaries. As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, the Parent consolidates the Operating Partnership. Because the Parent’s only significant asset is its investment in the Operating Partnership, the assets and liabilities of the Parent and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements.
Information with respect to the square footage, number of buildings and acres of land is unaudited.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and are presented in our reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. All material intercompany transactions with consolidated entities have been eliminated.
We consolidate all entities that are wholly owned and those in which we own less than 100% of the equity but control, as well as any variable interest entities in which we are the primary beneficiary. We evaluate our ability to control an entity and whether the entity is a variable interest entity and we are the primary beneficiary through consideration of substantive terms of the arrangement to identify which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity.
For entities that are not defined as variable interest entities (“VIEs”), we first consider whether we are the general partner or the limited partner (or the equivalent in such investments that are not structured as partnerships). We consolidate entities in which we are the general partner and the limited partners in such entities do not have rights that would preclude control. For entities in which we are the general partner but do not control the entity as the other partners hold substantive participating or kick-out rights, we apply the equity method of accounting since as the general partner we have the ability to influence the venture. For ventures for which we are a limited partner or our investment is in an entity that is not structured similar to a partnership, we consider factors such as ownership interest, voting control, authority to make decisions, and contractual and substantive participating rights of the partners. In instances where the factors indicate that we control the venture, we consolidate the entity.
Reclassifications. Certain amounts included in the Consolidated Financial Statements for 2015 and 2014 have been reclassified to conform to the 2016 financial statement presentation.
Use of Estimates. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reporting
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
period. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we made are reasonable and appropriate, as discussed in the applicable sections throughout the Consolidated Financial Statements, different assumptions and estimates could materially impact our reported results.
Foreign Operations. The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for our consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated entities operating in the U.S. and Mexico and certain of our consolidated subsidiaries that operate as holding companies for foreign investments. The functional currency for our consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated entities operating in countries other than the U.S. and Mexico is the principal currency in which the entity’s assets, liabilities, income and expenses are denominated, which may be different from the local currency of the country of incorporation or where the entity conducts its operations.
The functional currencies of our consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated entities generally include the Brazilian real, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Chinese renminbi, euro, Japanese yen and Singapore dollar. We take part in business transactions denominated in these and other local currencies where we operate.
For our consolidated subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, we translate their financial statements into the U.S. dollar at the time we consolidate those subsidiaries’ financial statements. Generally, assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (“AOCI”) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Certain balance sheet items, primarily equity and capital-related accounts, are reflected at the historical exchange rate. Income statement accounts are translated using the average exchange rate for the period and income statement accounts that represent significant nonrecurring transactions are translated at the rate in effect at the date of the transaction. We translate our share of the net earnings or losses of our unconsolidated entities whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar at the average exchange rate for the period.
We and certain of our consolidated subsidiaries have intercompany and third-party debt that is not denominated in the entity’s functional currency. When the debt is remeasured against the functional currency of the entity, a gain or loss can result. The resulting adjustment is reflected in results of operations, unless it is intercompany debt that is deemed to be long-term in nature and then the adjustment is reflected as a cumulative translation adjustment in AOCI.
Business Combinations. When we acquire a business or individual operating properties, we allocate the purchase price to the various components of the acquisition based on the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including an allocation to the individual buildings acquired. We generally acquire operating properties that meet the definition of a business and we expense transaction costs as incurred. The initial allocation of the purchase price is based on management’s preliminary assessment, which may differ when final information becomes available. Subsequent adjustments made to the initial purchase price allocation are made within the allocation period, not to exceed one year.
When we obtain control of an unconsolidated entity, we account for the acquisition in accordance with the guidance for a business combination achieved in stages. We remeasure our previously held interest in the unconsolidated entity at its acquisition-date fair value and recognize the resulting gain or loss, if any, in earnings at the acquisition date.
We allocate the purchase price using primarily Level 2 and Level 3 inputs (further defined in Fair Value Measurements below) as follows:
Investments in Real Estate Properties. We value operating properties as if vacant. We estimate fair value generally by applying an income approach methodology using a discounted cash flow analysis. Key assumptions in the discounted cash flow analysis include market rents, growth rates and discount and capitalization rates. We determine discount and capitalization rates by market based on recent transactions and other market data. The fair value of land is generally based on relevant market data, such as a comparison of the subject site to similar parcels that have recently been sold or are currently being offered on the market for sale.
Lease Intangibles. We determine the portion of the purchase price related to intangible assets and liabilities as follows:
Above and Below Market Leases. We recognize an asset or liability for acquired in-place leases with favorable or unfavorable rents based on our estimate of current market rents of the applicable markets. The value is recorded in either Other Assets or Other Liabilities, as appropriate, and is amortized over the term of the respective leases, including any bargain renewal options, to rental revenues.
Foregone Rent. We calculate the value of the revenue and recovery of costs foregone during a reasonable lease-up period, as if the space was vacant, in each of the applicable markets. The values are recorded in Other Assets and amortized over the remaining life of the respective leases to amortization expense.
Leasing Commissions. We recognize an asset for leasing commissions upon the acquisition of in-place leases based on our estimate of the cost to lease space in the applicable markets. The value is recorded in Other Assets and amortized over the remaining life of the respective leases to amortization expense.
Debt. We estimate the fair value of debt based on contractual future cash flows discounted using borrowing spreads and market interest rates that would be available to us for the issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. In the case of publicly traded debt, we estimate the fair value based on available market data. Any discount or premium to the principal amount is included in the carrying value and amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the related debt using the effective interest method.
Noncontrolling Interests. We estimate the portion of the fair value of the net assets owned by third parties based on the fair value of the consolidated net assets, principally real estate properties and debt.
Working Capital. We estimate fair value of other acquired assets and assumed liabilities on the best information available.
Fair Value Measurements. The objective of fair value is to determine the price that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). We estimate fair value using available market information and valuation methodologies we believe to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, accordingly, they are not necessarily indicative of amounts that we would realize on disposition. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels:
Level 1 — Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements. We estimate the fair value of our financial instruments using available market information and valuation methodologies we believe to be appropriate for these purposes as follows:
Debt. We estimate the fair value of our senior notes and exchangeable senior notes for disclosure purposes based on quoted market prices for the same (Level 1) or similar (Level 2) issues when current quoted market prices are available. We estimate the fair value of our credit facilities, term loans, secured mortgage debt and assessment bonds by discounting the future cash flows using rates and borrowing spreads currently available to us (Level 3).
Derivatives. We determine the fair value of our derivative instruments using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and implied volatilities. We determine the fair values of our interest rate swaps using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts or payments and the discounted expected variable cash payments. We base the variable cash payments on an expectation of future interest rates, or forward curves, derived from observable market interest rate curves. We base the fair values of our net investment hedges on the change in the spot rate at the end of the period as compared with the strike price at inception.
We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we consider the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.
We have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Although the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties, we assess the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis generally consist of real estate assets and investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities that were subject to impairment charges related to our change of intent to sell the investments and through our recoverability analysis discussed below. We estimate fair value based on expected sales prices in the market (Level 2).
Real Estate Assets. Real estate assets are carried at depreciated cost. We capitalize costs incurred in developing, renovating, rehabilitating and improving real estate assets as part of the investment basis of real estate assets. We expense costs for repairs and maintenance of the real estate assets as incurred.
During the land development and construction periods of qualifying projects, we capitalize interest costs, insurance, real estate taxes and general and administrative costs of the personnel performing the development, renovation, and rehabilitation; if such costs are incremental and identifiable to a specific activity to ready the asset for its intended use. We capitalize transaction costs related to the
acquisition of land for future development. We capitalize costs incurred to successfully originate a lease that result directly from and are essential to acquire that lease, including internal costs that are incremental and identifiable as leasing activities. Leasing costs that meet the requirements for capitalization are presented as a component of Other Assets.
We charge the depreciable portions of real estate assets to depreciation expense on a straight-line basis over the respective estimated useful lives. Depreciation commences when the asset is ready for its intended use, which we define as the earlier of stabilization (90% occupied) or one year after completion of construction. We generally use the following useful lives: 5 to 7 years for capital improvements, 10 years for standard tenant improvements, 25 years for depreciable land improvements, 30 years for operating properties acquired and 40 years for operating properties we develop. We depreciate building improvements on land parcels subject to ground leases over the shorter of the estimated building improvement life or the contractual term of the underlying ground lease. Capitalized leasing costs are amortized over the estimated remaining lease term. Our weighted average lease term on leases signed during 2016, based on square feet for all leases, was five years.
We assess the carrying values of our respective real estate assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. We measure the recoverability of the asset by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. If our analysis indicates that the carrying value of the real estate property is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, we recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the current estimated fair value of the real estate property.
We estimate the future undiscounted cash flows and fair value based on our intent as follows:
for real estate properties that we intend to hold long-term; including land held for development, properties currently under development and operating buildings; recoverability is assessed based on the estimated undiscounted future net rental income from operating the property and the terminal value, including anticipated costs to develop;
for real estate properties we intend to sell, including properties currently under development and operating buildings; recoverability is assessed based on proceeds from disposition that are estimated based on future net rental income of the property, expected market capitalization rates and anticipated costs to develop;
for land parcels we intend to sell, recoverability is assessed based on estimated proceeds from disposition; and
for costs incurred related to the potential acquisition of land or development of a real estate property, recoverability is assessed based on the probability that the acquisition or development is likely to occur at the measurement date.
Assets Held for Sale or Contribution. We classify a property as held for sale or contribution when certain criteria are met, in accordance with GAAP. Assets classified as held for sale are expected to be sold to a third party and assets classified as held for contribution are newly developed assets we intend to contribute to an unconsolidated co-investment venture or to a third party within twelve months. At such time, the respective assets and liabilities are presented separately in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and depreciation is no longer recognized. Assets held for sale or contribution are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value less the costs to sell the assets.
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities. We present our investments in certain entities under the equity method. We use the equity method when we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the venture but do not have control of the entity. Under the equity method, we initially recognize these investments (including advances) in the balance sheet at our cost, including formation costs and net of deferred gains from the contribution of properties, if applicable. We subsequently adjust the accounts to reflect our proportionate share of net earnings or losses recognized and accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, distributions received, contributions made and certain other adjustments, as appropriate. When circumstances indicate there may have been a reduction in the value of an equity investment, we evaluate whether the loss in value is other than temporary. If we conclude it is other than temporary, we recognize an impairment charge to reflect the equity investment at fair value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. We consider all cash on hand, demand deposits with financial institutions and short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Our cash and cash equivalents are financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk. We invest our cash with high-credit quality institutions. Cash balances may be invested in money market accounts that are not insured. We have not realized any losses in such cash investments or accounts and believe that we are not exposed to any significant credit risk.
Derivative Financial Instruments. We may use derivative financial instruments for the purpose of managing foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All of our derivative financial instruments are customized derivative transactions and are not exchange-traded. Management reviews our hedging program, derivative positions, and overall risk management strategy on a regular basis. We only enter into transactions that we believe will be highly effective at offsetting the underlying risk. Our use of derivatives involves the risk that counterparties may default on a derivative contract. We establish exposure limits for each counterparty to minimize this risk and provide counterparty diversification. Substantially all of our derivative exposures are with counterparties that have long-term credit ratings of single-A or better. We enter into master agreements with counterparties that generally allow for netting of certain exposures; thereby significantly reducing the
actual loss that would be incurred should a counterparty fail to perform its contractual obligations. To mitigate pre-settlement risk, minimum credit standards become more stringent as the duration of the derivative financial instrument increases. On the basis of these factors, we consider the risk of counterparty default to be minimal.
We recognize all derivatives at fair value within the line items Other Assets or Other Liabilities, as applicable. We do not net our derivative position by counterparty for purposes of balance sheet presentation and disclosure. Derivatives can be designated as fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations. The accounting for gains and losses that result from changes in the fair values of derivative instruments depends on whether the derivatives are designated as, and qualify as, hedging instruments. For derivatives that will be accounted for as hedging instruments, at inception of the transaction, we formally designate and document the financial instrument as a hedge of a specific underlying exposure, the risk management objective and the strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. In addition, we formally assess both at inception and at least quarterly thereafter, the effectiveness of our hedging transactions. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges and hedges of net investments in foreign operations are recorded in AOCI. The ineffective portion of a derivative financial instrument's change in fair value, if any, is immediately recognized in earnings. Due to the high degree of effectiveness between the hedging instruments and the underlying exposures hedged, fluctuations in the value of the derivative instruments will generally be offset by changes in the fair values or cash flows of the underlying exposures being hedged. We also use derivatives that are not designated as hedges (and may not meet the hedge accounting requirements) to manage certain risk. The changes in fair values of derivatives that were not designated or did not qualify as hedging instruments are immediately recognized in earnings. For cash flow hedges, we reclassify changes in the fair value of derivatives into the applicable line item in the Consolidated Statements of Income in which the hedged items are recorded in the same period that the underlying hedged items affect earnings.
Foreign Currency. We primarily manage our foreign currency exposure by borrowing in the currencies in which we invest. In certain circumstances, we may issue debt in a currency that is not the same functional currency of the borrowing entity to offset the translation and economic exposures related to our net investment in international subsidiaries. To mitigate the impact in earnings of translation from the fluctuations in exchange rates, we may designate the debt as a nonderivative financial instrument hedge. We also hedge our investments in certain international subsidiaries using foreign currency derivative contracts (net investment hedges) to offset the translation and economic exposures related to our investments in these subsidiaries by locking in a forward exchange rate at the inception of the hedge. To the extent we have an effective hedging relationship, we report all changes in fair value of the hedged portion of the nonderivative financial instruments and net investment hedges in equity in the foreign currency translation component of AOCI. These amounts offset the translation adjustments on the underlying net assets of our foreign investments, which we also record in AOCI. The foreign currency translation changes of the portion of the nonderivative financial instruments that are not designated as hedges are recorded directly in earnings within the line item Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses), Net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. We recognize ineffectiveness, if any, in earnings at the time the ineffectiveness occurred.
We may use foreign currency option contracts, including puts, calls and collars to mitigate foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with the translation of our projected earnings of our international subsidiaries, principally in Canada, Europe and Japan. Put option contracts provide us with the option to exchange foreign currency for U.S. dollars at a fixed exchange rate if the foreign currency were to depreciate against the U.S. dollar. Call option contracts create an obligation to exchange foreign currency for U.S. dollars at a fixed exchange rate if the foreign currency were to appreciate against the U.S. dollar. Collar option contracts combine the put and call options into one contract to effectively lock in a range around the rate at which net operating income of our subsidiaries will be translated into U.S. dollars. Foreign currency option contracts are not designated as hedges as they do not meet hedge accounting requirements. Changes in the fair value of non-hedge designated derivatives are recorded directly in earnings within the line item Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses), Net.
We may also use foreign currency forwards designed as cash flow hedges to mitigate foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with payments in a currency that is not the functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries. To the extent we have an effective hedging relationship, we report all changes in fair value of the hedged portion of the foreign currency forwards cash flow hedges in AOCI. We recognize ineffectiveness, if any, in earnings at the time the ineffectiveness occurred.
Interest Rate. Our interest rate risk management strategy is to limit the impact of future interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows as well as to stabilize interest expense and manage our exposure to interest rate movements. We primarily accomplish this by issuing fixed rate debt with staggering maturities. We may enter into interest rate swap agreements, which allow us to borrow on a fixed rate basis for longer-term debt issuances. We typically designate our interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements as cash flow hedges as these derivative instruments may be used to manage the interest rate risk on potential future debt issuances or to fix the interest rate on variable rate debt issuances. The maximum length of time that we hedge our exposure to future cash flows is typically 10 years or less. We have entered into interest rate swap agreements that allow us to receive variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of our agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount.
We report the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative as a component of AOCI, and reclassify it to Interest Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income over the corresponding period of the hedged item. To the extent the hedged debt is paid off early, we write off the remaining balance in AOCI and we recognize the amount in Interest Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. We recognize losses on a derivative representing hedge ineffectiveness in Interest Expense at the time the ineffectiveness occurred.
Costs of Raising Capital. We treat costs incurred in connection with the issuance of common and preferred stock as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. We capitalize costs incurred in connection with the issuance of debt. Costs related to our credit facilities are included in Other Assets and costs related to all our other debt are recorded as a direct reduction of the liability. Costs associated with debt modifications are expensed when incurred.
AOCI. For the Parent, we include AOCI as a separate component of stockholders' equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the Operating Partnership, AOCI is included in partners’ capital in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any reference to AOCI in this document is referring to the component of stockholders’ equity for the Parent and partners’ capital for the Operating Partnership.
Noncontrolling Interests. Noncontrolling interests represent the share of consolidated entities owned by third parties. We recognize each noncontrolling holder’s respective share of the estimated fair value of the net assets at the date of formation or acquisition. Noncontrolling interests are subsequently adjusted for the noncontrolling holder’s share of additional contributions, distributions and their share of the net earnings or losses of each respective consolidated entity. We allocate net income to noncontrolling interests based on the weighted-average ownership interest during the period. The net income that is not attributable to us is reflected in the line item Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. We do not recognize a gain or loss on transactions with a consolidated entity in which we do not own 100% of the equity, but we reflect the difference in cash received or paid from the noncontrolling interests carrying amount as paid-in-capital.
Certain limited partnership interests are exchangeable into our common stock. Common stock issued upon exchange of a holder’s noncontrolling interest is accounted for at the carrying value of the surrendered limited partnership interest.
Revenue Recognition.
Rental Revenues. We lease our operating properties to customers under agreements that are classified as operating leases. We recognize the total minimum lease payments provided for under the leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Generally, under the terms of our leases, the majority of our rental expenses are recovered from our customers. We reflect amounts recovered from customers as revenues in the period that the applicable expenses are incurred. We make a provision for possible loss if the collection of a receivable balance is considered doubtful.
Strategic Capital Revenues. Strategic capital revenues include revenues we earn from the management services we provide to unconsolidated entities. These fees are determined in accordance with the terms specific to each arrangement and may include property and asset management fees or transactional fees for leasing, acquisition, development, construction, financing, legal and tax services provided. We may also earn incentive returns (called “promotes”) based on third-party investor returns over time, which may be during the duration of the venture or at the time of liquidation. We recognize fees when they are earned, fixed and determinable. We report these fees in Strategic Capital Revenues. The fees we earn to develop properties within these ventures are reflected in Development Management and Other Revenues on a percentage of completion basis.
We also earned fees from ventures that we consolidate. Upon consolidation these fees were eliminated from our earnings and the third party share of these fees were recognized as a reduction of Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests.
Gains (Losses) on Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate. We recognize gains on the disposition of real estate when the recognition criteria have been met, generally at the time the risks and rewards and title have transferred and we no longer have substantial continuing involvement with the real estate sold. We recognize losses from the disposition of real estate when known.
When we contribute a property to an unconsolidated entity in which we have an ownership interest, we do not recognize a portion of the gain realized. The amount of gain not recognized, based on our ownership interest in the entity acquiring the property, is deferred by recognizing a reduction to our investment in the applicable unconsolidated entity. We adjust our proportionate share of net earnings or losses recognized in future periods to reflect the entities’ recorded depreciation expense as if it were computed on our lower basis in the contributed properties rather than on the entity’s basis.
When a property that we originally contributed to an unconsolidated entity is disposed of to a third party, we recognize the amount of the gain we previously deferred, along with our proportionate share of the gain recognized by the unconsolidated entity. If our ownership interest in an unconsolidated entity decreases and the decrease is expected to be permanent, we recognize the amounts relating to previously deferred gains to coincide with our new ownership interest.
Rental Expenses. Rental expenses primarily include the cost of our property management personnel, utilities, repairs and maintenance, property insurance and real estate taxes.
Strategic Capital Expenses. Strategic capital expenses generally include the direct expenses associated with the asset management of the unconsolidated co-investment ventures provided by our employees who are assigned to our Strategic Capital segment. In addition, in order to achieve efficiencies and economies of scale, all of our property management functions are provided by property management personnel who are assigned to our Real Estate Operations segment. These individuals perform the property-level management of the properties in our owned and managed portfolio, which include properties we consolidate and those we manage that are owned by the unconsolidated co-investment ventures. We allocate the costs of our property management to the properties we
consolidate (included in Rental Expenses) and the properties owned by the unconsolidated co-investment ventures (included in Strategic Capital Expenses) by using the square feet owned by the respective portfolios.
Equity-Based Compensation. We account for equity-based compensation by measuring the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the fair value of the award on the grant date. We recognize the cost of the award on a straight-line basis over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, generally the vesting period.
Income Taxes. Under the Internal Revenue Code, REITs are generally not required to pay federal income taxes if they distribute 100% of their taxable income and meet certain income, asset and stockholder tests. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years. Even as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our own income and property, and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income.
We have elected taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) status for some of our consolidated subsidiaries. This allows us to provide services that would otherwise be considered impermissible for REITs. Many of the foreign countries in which we have operations do not recognize REITs or do not accord REIT status under their respective tax laws to our entities that operate in their jurisdiction. In the U.S., we are taxed in certain states in which we operate. Accordingly, we recognize income tax expense for the federal and state income taxes incurred by our TRSs, taxes incurred in certain states and foreign jurisdictions, and interest and penalties associated with our unrecognized tax benefit liabilities.
We evaluate tax positions taken in the Consolidated Financial Statements under the interpretation for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. As a result of this evaluation, we may recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities.
We recognize deferred income taxes in certain taxable entities. For federal income tax purposes, certain acquisitions have been treated as tax-free transactions resulting in a carry-over basis in assets and liabilities. For financial reporting purposes and in accordance with purchase accounting, we record all of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities at the estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. For our taxable subsidiaries, including certain international jurisdictions, we recognize the deferred income tax liabilities that represent the tax effect of the difference between the tax basis carried over and the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets at the date of acquisition. Any subsequent increases or decreases to the deferred income tax liability recorded in connection with these acquisitions, related to tax uncertainties acquired, are reflected in earnings.
If taxable income is generated in these subsidiaries, we recognize a benefit in earnings as a result of the reversal of the deferred income tax liability previously recorded at the acquisition date and we record current income tax expense representing the entire current income tax liability. If the reversal of the deferred income tax liability results from a sale or contribution of assets, the classification of the reversal to the Consolidated Statement of Income is based on the taxability of the transaction. We record the reversal to deferred income tax benefit as a taxable transaction if we dispose of the asset. We record the reversal as Gains on Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments Upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Net as a non-taxable transaction if we dispose of the asset along with the entity that owns the asset.
Deferred income tax expense is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences (items that are treated differently for tax purposes than for financial reporting purposes) and the utilization of tax net operating losses (“NOL”) generated in prior years that had been previously recognized as deferred income tax assets. We provide for a valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets if we believe all or some portion of the deferred income tax asset may not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances that causes a change in the estimated ability to realize the related deferred income tax asset is included in deferred tax expense.
Environmental Costs. We incur certain environmental remediation costs, including cleanup costs, consulting fees for environmental studies and investigations, monitoring costs, and legal costs relating to cleanup, litigation defense, and the pursuit of responsible third parties. We expense costs incurred in connection with operating properties and properties previously sold. We capitalize costs related to undeveloped land as development costs and include any expected future environmental liabilities at the time of acquisition. We include costs incurred for properties to be disposed in the cost of the properties upon disposition. We maintain a liability for the estimated costs of environmental remediation expected to be incurred in connection with undeveloped land, operating properties and properties previously sold that we adjust as appropriate as information becomes available.
New Accounting Pronouncements.
New Accounting Standards Adopted
In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard update that provides guidance for areas in which there is diversity in how certain cash receipts and payments are presented and classified in the statements of cash flows. The update clarifies the classification methodology within the statements of cash flows for eight specific topics. In 2016, we early adopted the standard in its entirety on a retrospective basis, and we determined that the only clarification to significantly impact us was the classification of distributions received from equity method investments. The update allows for the election to classify distributions
received from equity method investments based on either a cumulative earnings approach or a nature of distribution approach. We have elected the nature of distribution approach, in which cash flows generated from the operations of an unconsolidated entity are classified as a return on investment (cash inflow from operating activities) and cash flows that are generated from property sales, debt refinancing or sales of our investments are classified as a return of investment (cash inflow from investing activities). We adopted this approach based on the information available to us to determine the nature of the underlying activity that generated the distributions from unconsolidated entities. As a result of our adoption of this standard, we reclassified $140.6 million and $177.0 million of distributions from our unconsolidated entities into Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities that was previously reported as Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities for the years ended December 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
In March 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that amends the stock compensation requirements in existing GAAP. The update simplifies certain aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, statutory tax withholding requirements, forfeitures and classification of taxes paid to a tax authority by us when we withhold shares to cover employee withholding tax payments for certain stock compensation plans in the statements of cash flows. We adopted the standard in its entirety on a retrospective basis in 2016. As a result of our adoption of this standard, we reclassified payments of $12.3 million and $13.0 million from Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities for the years ended December 31, 2015, and 2014, respectively.
In February 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that amends the consolidation requirements in existing GAAP. Under the update, all entities, including limited partnerships and similar legal entities, are now within the scope of consolidation guidance, unless a scope exception applies. We adopted this standard on a modified retrospective basis on January 1, 2016, and the adoption did not have a significant effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements, however the Operating Partnership and certain of our consolidated co-investment ventures now qualify as VIEs under the new guidance, which required additional disclosures. See Note 12 for additional information about our VIEs.
New Accounting Standards Issued but not yet Adopted
In January 2017, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that clarifies the definition of a business. The update adds further guidance that assists preparers in evaluating whether a transaction will be accounted for as an acquisition of an asset or a business. We expect most of our acquisitions of operating properties and portfolios of operating properties to qualify as asset acquisitions under the standard which permits the capitalization of acquisition costs to the basis of the acquired buildings. This standard is effective for periods beginning after December 31, 2017, however we plan to adopt this standard in 2017 for the annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016. We do not expect the adoption to have a significant impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard that requires companies to use a five step model to determine when to recognize revenue from customer contracts in an effort to increase consistency and comparability throughout global capital markets and across industries. We are evaluating each of our revenue streams and related accounting policy under the standard. Rental revenues and recoveries earned from leasing our operating properties will be evaluated with the adoption of the lease accounting standard (discussed below). Our evaluation under the revenue recognition standard also includes sales to third parties and unconsolidated co-investment ventures as well as recurring fees and promotes earned from our co-investment ventures. For sales to third parties, primarily a result of disposition of real estate in exchange for cash with few contingencies, we do not expect the standard to significantly impact the recognition of or accounting for these sales. Due to our continuing involvement through our equity ownership in our unconsolidated co-investment ventures, we are evaluating the accounting for sales to unconsolidated co-investment ventures under the standard. Additionally, while we do not expect changes in the recognition of recurring fees earned from the co-investment ventures, we are evaluating both the timing and measurement of promotes earned from co-investment ventures under the standard that may result in recognizing such fees when they are probable of being earned. The standard is effective for us on January 1, 2018. In addition to the recognition changes discussed above, expanded quantitative and qualitative disclosures regarding revenue recognition will be required for contracts that are subject to the standard. We expect to adopt the standard on a modified retrospective basis.
In February 2016, the FASB issued an accounting standard that provides the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases.
The accounting for lessors will remain largely unchanged from current GAAP; however, the standard requires that lessors expense, on an as-incurred basis, certain initial direct costs that are not incremental in negotiating a lease. Under existing standards, certain of these costs are capitalizable and therefore this new standard may result in certain of these costs being expensed as incurred after adoption. This standard may also impact the timing, recognition and disclosures related to our rental recoveries from tenants earned from leasing our operating properties.
Under the standard, lessees apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases. A lessee is required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months, regardless of their lease classification. Based on our real estate leases, we are a lessee on ground leases in certain markets and office space leases. Due to the length of the lease terms of certain ground leases, it is likely they will be classified as finance leases under the standard. At December 31, 2016, we have approximately 90 ground and office space leases that will require us to measure and record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability upon adoption of the standard. Details of our future minimum rental payments under these ground and office space leases are disclosed in Note 4.
The standard is effective for us on January 1, 2019. We are assessing the practical expedients available for implementation under the standard. If the practical expedients are elected, we would not be required to reassess (i) whether an expired or existing contract meets the definition of a lease, (ii) the lease classification at the adoption date for expired or existing leases, and (iii) whether costs previously capitalized as initial direct costs would continue to be amortized. The standard will also require new disclosures within the notes accompanying our consolidated financial statements. We will continue to assess the method of adoption and the overall impact the adoption will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE 3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
KTR Capital Partners and Its Affiliates
On May 29, 2015, we acquired the high quality real estate assets and operating platform with high profile customers and comparable market composition to ours from KTR Capital Partners and its affiliates (“KTR”). The portfolio consisted of 315 operating properties, aggregating 59.0 million square feet, 3.6 million square feet of properties under development and land parcels that will support an estimated build out of 6.8 million square feet. The properties were acquired by our consolidated co-investment venture Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture (“USLV”), of which we own 55%. The transaction was funded through cash (which included the contribution of $2.3 billion from our venture partner and the proceeds from the issuance of debt, as detailed in Note 9), the assumption of secured mortgage debt and the issuance of 4.5 million common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership. We incurred $24.7 million of acquisition costs that are included in Other Expenses during 2015.
The allocation of the purchase price required a significant amount of judgment and was based on our valuations, estimates and assumptions of the acquisition date fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The adjustments finalizing the purchase price allocation during the measurement period were not considered to be material to our financial position or results of operations.
The allocation of the purchase price was as follows (in thousands):
5,441,384
Intangible assets, net of intangible liabilities
332,708
Accounts receivable and other assets
8,062
Debt, including premium
(735,172
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
(56,313
Total estimated purchase price
4,990,669
Our venture partner’s share of purchase price
(2,253,234
Common limited partnership units issued in the Operating Partnership
(181,170
Prologis share of cash purchase price
2,556,265
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents our results as though the KTR transaction had been completed on January 1, 2014. The pro forma information does not reflect the actual results of operations had the transaction actually been completed on January 1, 2014, and it is not indicative of future operating results. The results for the year ended December 31, 2015, include approximately seven months of actual results for the transaction, the acquisition expenses, and five months of pro forma adjustments. Actual results in 2015 include rental revenues and rental expenses of the properties acquired of $235.7 million and $56.9 million, respectively, representing the period from acquisition through December 31, 2015.
The following amounts are in thousands, except per share amounts:
2,358,643
2,064,724
866,753
537,861
1.08
1.65
1.07
These results include certain adjustments, primarily: (i) decreased revenues from the amortization of the net assets from the acquired leases with net favorable rents relative to estimated market rents; (ii) increased depreciation and amortization expense resulting from the adjustment of real estate assets to estimated fair value and recognition of intangible assets related to in-place leases; and (iii) additional interest expense attributable to the debt issued to finance our cash portion of the acquisition offset by lower interest expense due to the accretion of the fair value adjustment of debt.
Acquisition of a Controlling Interest in Prologis North American Industrial Fund
During 2014, we increased our ownership in Prologis North American Industrial Fund (“NAIF”) from 23.1% to 66.1% by acquiring the equity units from all but one partner for an aggregate of $679.0 million. This included the acquisition of $46.8 million of equity units on October 20, 2014, that resulted in our gaining control over NAIF, based on the rights of the limited partners, and therefore we began
consolidating NAIF at that date and recognized a gain of $201.3 million in Gains on Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Net.
The total purchase price was $1.1 billion, which included our investment in NAIF at the time of consolidation. The adjustments finalizing the purchase price allocation during the measurement period were not considered to be material to our financial position or results of operations.
2,658,252
138,185
Cash
87,780
5,664
(1,195,213
(57,655
(554,493
Total purchase price
1,082,520
Actual results in 2014 included rental revenues and rental expenses of the properties acquired in the NAIF acquisition of $49.2 million and $13.3 million, respectively, offset by the impact of noncontrolling interests.
NOTE 4. REAL ESTATE
Investments in real estate properties consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars and square feet in thousands):
Number of Buildings
Operating properties:
Buildings and improvements
331,210
333,830
1,776
17,905,914
17,861,693
Improved land
6,037,543
5,874,052
Development portfolio, including land costs:
Prestabilized
8,256
12,598
798,233
918,099
Properties under development
19,539
19,630
633,849
954,804
Land (1)
1,218,904
1,359,794
Other real estate investments (2)
524,887
552,926
Total investments in real estate properties
Included in our investments in real estate at December 31, 2016, and 2015 were 5,892 and 7,404 acres of land, respectively.
Included in other real estate investments are: (i) non-logistics real estate; (ii) land parcels that are ground leased to third parties; (iii) our corporate office buildings; (iv) infrastructure costs related to projects we are developing on behalf of others; (v) costs related to future development projects, including purchase options on land; and (vi) earnest money deposits associated with potential acquisitions.
At December 31, 2016, we owned real estate assets in the U.S. and other Americas (Canada and Mexico), Europe (Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom (“U.K.”)) and Asia (China, Japan and Singapore).
Acquisitions
The following table summarizes our acquisitions of properties from third parties for the years ended December 31 (dollars and square feet in thousands):
Number of operating properties
1,823
7,375
1,004
Real estate acquisition value (1)
411,706
1,042,562
548,201
Value includes the acquisition of 776, 690, and 1,040 acres of land in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The table above does not include the properties acquired in the KTR transaction, as this transaction is explained in Note 3.
Dispositions
The following table summarizes our real estate disposition activity for the years ended December 31 (dollars and square feet in thousands):
11,624
8,355
25,247
Net proceeds (1)
1,231,878
835,385
1,825,311
Net gains on contributions (1)
267,441
148,987
188,268
20,360
23,024
19,856
1,760,048
2,352,645
1,365,318
Net gains on dispositions (1)
353,668
609,900
336,203
621,109
524,471
Gains on redemptions of investments in co-investment ventures (2)
136,289
Gains on revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling
interest, net (3)
201,319
Total gains on dispositions of investments in real estate, net
Includes the disposition of land parcels.
See Note 5 for more information on these transactions.
See Note 3 for more information on this transaction.
In 2014, we launched the initial public offering of FIBRA Prologis, a Mexican REIT. In connection with the offering, FIBRA Prologis purchased 177 properties aggregating 29.7 million square feet (12.6 million square feet related to our wholly owned portfolio, 7.6 million square feet from our consolidated co-investment venture Prologis Mexico Fondo Logistico (“AFORES”) and 9.5 million square feet from our unconsolidated co-investment venture Prologis Mexico Industrial Fund). Also in 2014, AFORES contributed its remaining operating properties and the balance of its secured debt to FIBRA Prologis. The difference between the amount received and the noncontrolling interests balance related to the properties contributed was $34.6 million, and was adjusted through equity with no gain or loss recognized. On the basis of this transaction, we recognized a gain on disposition of investments in real estate of $52.5 million; current tax expense of $32.4 million; deferred tax benefit of $55.5 million; and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest of $61.0 million.
Operating Lease Agreements
We lease our operating properties and certain land parcels to customers under agreements that are generally classified as operating leases. Our weighted average lease term remaining, based on square feet for all leases in effect at December 31, 2016, was four years.
The following table summarizes our minimum lease payments on leases with lease periods greater than one year for space in our operating properties, pre-stabilized development properties and leases of land subject to ground leases at December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
1,633,990
1,488,049
1,239,683
1,038,305
809,961
2,391,452
8,601,440
These amounts do not reflect future rental revenues from the renewal or replacement of existing leases and exclude reimbursements of operating expenses.
Lease Commitments
We have entered into operating ground leases as a lessee on certain land parcels, primarily on-tarmac facilities and office space with remaining lease terms of 1 to 73 years. The following table summarizes our future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases in effect at December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
30,976
32,035
29,520
28,379
24,480
332,835
478,225
NOTE 5. UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
Summary of Investments
We have investments in entities through a variety of ventures. We co-invest in entities that own multiple properties with partners and investors and provide asset and property management services to these entities, which we refer to as co-investment ventures. These entities may be consolidated or unconsolidated, depending on the structure, our partner’s participation and other rights and our level of control of the entity. This note details our investments in unconsolidated co-investment ventures, which are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. See Note 12 for more detail regarding our consolidated investments.
We also have other ventures, generally with one partner and that we do not manage, which we account for using the equity method. We refer to our investments in all entities accounted for using the equity method, both unconsolidated co-investment ventures and other ventures, collectively, as unconsolidated entities.
The following table summarizes our investments in and advances to our unconsolidated entities at December 31 (in thousands):
Unconsolidated co-investment ventures
4,057,524
4,585,427
Other ventures
172,905
170,193
The following table summarizes our investments in the individual co-investment ventures at December 31 (dollars in thousands):
Percentage
Investment in
and Advances to
Co-Investment Venture
Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund, L.P. (“USLF”) (1)
14.9
22.5
434,818
689,408
FIBRA Prologis (2) (3)
45.9
547,744
569,800
Prologis Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I, L.P. (“Brazil Fund”)
and related joint ventures (4)
various
297,300
216,668
Europe Logistics Venture 1, FCP-FIS (“ELV”) (5) (6)
48,289
53,960
Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl (“PELP”) (5)
50.0
1,623,707
1,762,291
Prologis European Properties Fund II, FCP-FIS (“PEPF II”)
31.2
31.3
344,200
410,984
Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund, FCP-FIS (“PTELF”) (1) (6)
23.5
41.6
310,118
480,401
Nippon Prologis REIT, Inc. (“NPR”) (7) (8)
15.1
348,570
300,822
Prologis China Logistics Venture I, LP and II, LP
(Prologis China Logistics Venture) (5)
102,778
101,093
During 2016, we redeemed a portion of our investment in PTELF and USLF for €275.0 million ($311.1 million) and $300.0 million, respectively, and recorded a gain of $136.3 million, which is included in Gains on the Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments Upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Net. The amounts received for the redemptions were included in Return of Investment from Unconsolidated Entities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
At December 31, 2016, we owned 291.1 million units of FIBRA Prologis that had a closing price of Ps 29.69 ($1.44) per unit on the Mexican Stock Exchange.
We have granted FIBRA Prologis a right of first refusal with respect to stabilized properties that we plan to sell in Mexico.
We have a 50% ownership interest in and consolidate an entity that in turn owns 50% of several entities that we account for on the equity method. Also, we have additional investments in other unconsolidated entities in Brazil that we account for on the equity method with various ownership interests ranging from 5% to 50%.
We have one partner in each of these co-investment ventures.
(6)
(7)
At December 31, 2016, we owned 0.3 million units of NPR that had a closing price of ¥238,900 ($2,041) per share on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had receivables from NPR of $96.9 million and $85.2 million, respectively, related to customer security deposits that originated through a leasing company owned by us that pertain to properties owned by NPR. We have a corresponding payable to NPR’s customers in Other Liabilities.
(8)
For any properties we develop and plan to sell in Japan, we have committed to offer those properties to NPR.
The amounts recognized in Strategic Capital Revenues and Earnings from Unconsolidated Entities, Net depend on the size and operations of the co-investment ventures, the timing of revenues earned through promotes during the life of a venture or upon liquidation, as well as fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We recognized Strategic Capital Expenses for direct costs associated with the asset management of these ventures and allocated property-level management costs for the properties owned by the ventures. Our ownership interest in these ventures also impacts the earnings we recognize.
The following table summarizes the amounts we recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income related to the unconsolidated co-investment ventures for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Strategic capital revenues and other revenues:
37,911
36,964
81,351
22,777
22,516
13,003
184,956
112,675
86,487
46,521
35,453
37,509
Total strategic capital revenues
292,165
207,608
218,350
11,006
7,467
5,424
Total strategic capital revenues and other revenues
303,171
215,075
223,774
Earnings from unconsolidated co-investment ventures, net:
10,441
7,124
16,420
27,155
28,842
(7,824
137,652
106,656
108,430
16,629
12,780
14,022
Total earnings from unconsolidated co-investment ventures, net
191,877
155,402
131,048
The following table summarizes the promotes earned and recognized in Strategic Capital Revenues for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Strategic capital – promote revenues
Total promote (1)
99,766
56,637
42,132
Less: Prologis’ share
11,222
27,175
10,852
Net promote recognized (third-party share) in strategic capital revenues
88,544
29,462
31,280
We earned promotes from PTELF and PEPF II in 2016, PELP and ELV in 2015 and USLF in 2014, each based on the venture’s cumulative returns to the investors over the last three years.
Approximately 40% of promote revenues are paid as a combination of cash and stock awards pursuant to the terms of the Prologis Promote Plan and expensed through Strategic Capital Expenses. See Note 13 for more information on this plan.
The following tables summarize the operating information and financial position of our unconsolidated co-investment ventures (not our proportionate share), at December 31 and for the years ended December 31 as presented at our adjusted basis derived from the ventures’ GAAP information:
(dollars and square feet in millions)
Third-party debt
1,433
1,594
1,540
1,550
1,697
Our investment balance (1)
690
Our weighted average ownership (2)
24.3
657
679
708
717
845
786
825
43.9
43.8
42.9
2,446
2,640
2,621
3,283
3,584
3,501
2,327
2,707
2,773
35.1
38.9
38.8
1,947
1,520
1,637
2,239
1,751
1,734
451
Totals:
6,250
6,531
7,876
7,593
7,649
4,058
4,585
4,666
27.9
31.6
32.0
(in millions)
2014 (3)
395
382
541
170
964
1,001
342
275
280
1,943
1,832
1,992
Net earnings:
268
Total net earnings
The difference between our ownership interest of a venture’s equity and our investment balance at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, results principally from three types of transactions: (i) deferring a portion of the gains we recognize from a contribution of a property to a venture ($469.9 million, $430.7 million and $322.9 million, respectively); (ii) recording additional costs associated with our investment in the venture ($124.1 million, $122.1 million and $117.5 million respectively); and (iii) advances to a venture ($166.1 million, $189.7 million and $125.7 million, respectively).
Represents our weighted average ownership interest in all co-investment ventures based on each entity’s contribution of total assets, before depreciation, net of other liabilities.
We had significant activity with our U.S. and Other Americas unconsolidated co-investment ventures in 2014 as explained in Notes 3 and 4. We began consolidating NAIF in 2014. We formed and invested in FIBRA Prologis in 2014 and in connection with this transaction, we concluded our unconsolidated co-investment venture in Mexico.
Equity Commitments Related to Certain Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures
Certain co-investment ventures have equity commitments from us and our venture partners. Our venture partners fulfill their equity commitment with cash. We may fulfill our equity commitment through contributions of properties or cash. The venture may obtain financing for the properties and therefore the acquisition price of additional investments that the venture could make may be more than the equity commitment. Depending on market conditions, the investment objectives of the ventures, our liquidity needs and other factors, we may make additional contributions of properties or additional cash investments in these ventures through the remaining commitment period.
The following table summarizes the remaining equity commitments at December 31, 2016 (in millions):
Equity Commitments
Expiration Date
for Remaining Commitments
Prologis
Venture Partners
Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund (1)
243
294
1,665
1,959
2,088
2,382
Equity commitments are denominated in euro and reported in U.S. dollars based on an exchange rate of $1.05 U.S. dollars to the euro.
NOTE 6. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE OR CONTRIBUTION
We have investments in certain real estate properties that met the criteria to be classified as held for sale or contribution at December 31, 2016 and 2015. These properties are expected to be sold to third parties or contributed to unconsolidated co-investment ventures within twelve months. The amounts included in Assets Held for Sale or Contribution represented real estate investment balances and the related assets and liabilities for each property.
Assets held for sale or contribution consisted of the following (dollars and square feet in thousands):
4,167
5,065
Total assets held for sale or contribution
Total liabilities associated with assets held for sale or contribution – included in Other Liabilities
4,984
6,874
NOTE 7. NOTES RECEIVABLE BACKED BY REAL ESTATE
The following table summarizes information about our notes receivable backed by real estate (dollars in thousands):
Balance Outstanding
Interest Rates
Maturity Dates
Balance at January 1, 2016
2.0% – 10.0%
February 2016 – April 2017
Additions
Repayments
(202,950
5.8% – 10.0%
April 2017 – December 2017
NOTE 8. OTHER ASSETS AND OTHER LIABILITIES
The following table summarizes our other assets, net of amortization and depreciation, if applicable, at December 31 (in thousands):
286,821
229,645
Rent leveling
285,824
226,239
Acquired lease intangibles
267,907
433,949
Prepaid assets
120,361
107,000
Accounts receivable
110,918
89,611
Fixed assets
102,830
94,178
Value added taxes receivable
94,713
86,115
Derivative assets
47,114
53,579
Management contracts
41,993
46,293
Other notes receivable
35,824
41,262
Deferred income taxes
14,052
14,650
88,633
91,989
The following table summarizes our other liabilities, net of amortization, if applicable, at December 31 (in thousands):
Tenant security deposits
206,301
190,160
Unearned rents
90,233
77,730
Income tax liabilities
68,666
81,125
31,707
55,976
Environmental liabilities
24,572
21,484
Deferred income
21,629
29,197
Value added taxes payable
15,888
10,272
Derivative liabilities
1,268
13,729
167,055
154,702
The following table summarizes the expected future amortization of leasing commissions and foregone rent into amortization expense and above and below market leases and rent leveling net assets into rental revenues, all based on the balances at December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Amortization Expense
Net (Increase) Decrease to
Rental Revenues
135,263
(24,939
98,435
25,795
76,315
40,306
59,969
46,465
44,137
41,831
106,325
158,943
520,444
288,401
NOTE 9. DEBT
All debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership. The Parent does not have any indebtedness, but guarantees the unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership.
The following table summarizes our debt at December 31 (dollars in thousands):
Weighted Average Interest Rate (1)
Amount Outstanding (2)
Amount Outstanding
Credit facilities
35,023
Senior notes (3)
6,417,492
6,516,392
Term loans
1.4
1,484,523
2.1
2,100,009
Unsecured other (4)
6.1
14,478
6.2
15,448
Secured mortgages (5)
4.9
979,585
5.1
1,172,473
Secured mortgages of consolidated entities (6)
3.0
1,677,193
2.9
1,822,509
The interest rates presented represent the effective interest rates (including amortization of debt issuance costs and the noncash premiums or discounts) at the end of the period for the debt outstanding.
Included in the outstanding balances are borrowings denominated in non-U.S. dollars, principally: euro ($3.3 billion), Japanese yen ($1.3 billion), Canadian dollars ($0.4 billion) and British pound sterling ($0.2 billion).
Notes are due January 2018 to June 2026 with effective interest rates ranging from 1.5% to 7.6% at December 31, 2016.
The balance at December 31, 2016, represents primarily assessment bonds that are due November 2019 to September 2033 with effective interest rates ranging from 4.5% to 7.9%. The assessment bonds are issued by municipalities and guaranteed by us as a means of financing infrastructure and secured by assessments (similar to property taxes) on various underlying real estate properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $737.4 million at December 31, 2016.
Debt is due May 2018 to December 2025 with effective interest rates ranging from 0.4% to 7.8% at December 31, 2016. The debt is secured by 145 real estate properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $2.4 billion at December 31, 2016.
Debt is due July 2017 to December 2027 with effective interest rates ranging from 2.4% to 5.3% at December 31, 2016. The debt is secured by 208 real estate properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $3.0 billion at December 31, 2016.
Credit Facilities
We have a global senior credit facility (the “Global Facility”), under which we may draw in British pounds sterling, Canadian dollars, euro, Japanese yen and U.S. dollars on a revolving basis. In 2016, we renewed and amended the Global Facility to increase our availability from $2.3 billion to $3.0 billion (subject to currency fluctuations). We have the ability to increase the Global Facility to $3.8 billion, subject to currency fluctuations and obtaining additional lender commitments. Pricing under the Global Facility, including the spread over LIBOR, facility fees and letter of credit fees, varies based on the public debt ratings of the Operating Partnership. The Global Facility is scheduled to mature in April 2020; however, we may extend the maturity date for six months on two occasions, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and payment of extension fees.
We also have a ¥45 billion ($384.4 million at December 31, 2016) Japanese yen revolver (the “Revolver”) with availability to increase to ¥56.5 billion ($482.6 million at December 31, 2016), subject to obtaining additional lender commitments. Pricing under the Revolver, including the spread over LIBOR, facility fees and letter of credit fees, varies based on the public debt ratings of the Operating Partnership. The Revolver is scheduled to mature in May 2018.
We refer to the Global Facility and the Revolver, collectively, as our “Credit Facilities.”
The following table summarizes information about our Credit Facilities (dollars in millions):
For the years ended December 31:
Weighted average daily interest rate
Weighted average daily borrowings
Maximum borrowings outstanding at any month-end
307
942
742
At December 31:
Aggregate lender – commitments
3,306
2,662
2,742
Less:
Borrowings outstanding
Outstanding letters of credit
Current availability
3,235
2,630
Senior Notes
The senior notes are unsecured and our obligations are effectively subordinated in certain respects to any of our debt that is secured by a lien on real property, to the extent of the value of such real property. The senior notes require interest payments be made quarterly, semi-annually or annually. All of the senior notes are redeemable at any time at our option, subject to certain prepayment penalties. Such repurchase and other terms are governed by the provisions of indenture agreements, various note purchase agreements or trust deeds.
During the years ended December 31 we issued the following senior notes (dollars and euros in thousands):
Principal Amount
Stated Interest Rate
Effective Interest Rate
Maturity Date
May 2015 (1)
€
700,000
785,470
1.4%
1.5%
May 2021
October 2015
750,000
3.8%
4.0%
November 2025
February 2014 (1)
959,420
3.4%
3.5%
February 2024
June 2014 (1)
500,000
680,550
3.0%
June 2026
October 2014 (1)
600,000
756,420
October 2020
This debt is denominated in euro and the exchange rate used to calculate into U.S. dollar was the effective rate at the date of the transaction.
Term Loans
The following table summarizes our outstanding term loans at December 31 (dollars and borrowing currency in thousands):
Term Loan
Borrowing Currency
Initial Borrowing Date
Lender Commitment at 2016
Amount Outstanding at 2016
Amount Outstanding at 2015
USD
2014 Yen Term Loan (1)
JPY
May 2014
339,858
LIBOR plus 1.20%
Euro Term Loan (2)
USD, EUR, JPY and GBP
June 2014
525,000
193,293
561,879
LIBOR plus 0.98%
June 2017
Senior Term Loan (3)
May 2015
400,000
LIBOR plus 1.00%
2015 Yen Term Loan (1)
June 2015
539,906
LIBOR plus 1.10%
2015 Canadian Term Loan
CAD
December 2015
371,925
276,322
267,872
CDOR rate plus 1.50%
February 2023
Yen Term Loan (1)
August 2016
¥
120,000,000
1,025,057
Yen LIBOR plus 0.65%
August 2022 and 2023
Subtotal
1,494,672
2,109,515
Debt issuance costs, net
(10,149
(9,506
In March 2016, we entered into an unsecured senior term loan agreement under which we could draw in Japanese yen and borrowed ¥11.2 billion ($99.5 million). In August 2016, we entered into a separate unsecured senior term loan agreement (the “Yen Term Loan”) under which we can draw in Japanese yen, of which ¥50.0 billion ($427.1 million at December 31, 2016) matures in August 2022 and ¥70.0 billion ($597.9 million at December 31, 2016) matures in August 2023. We may increase the borrowings up to ¥200.0 billion ($1.7 billion at December 31, 2016), subject to obtaining additional lender commitments. In the third quarter of 2016, we borrowed on the Yen Term Loan ($1.2 billion) and used the proceeds to repay and cancel the previous outstanding Japanese yen term loans entered into in 2014 and 2015 and 2016. The Yen Term Loan was fully drawn at December 31, 2016.
We may increase the borrowings up to €1.0 billion ($1.1 billion at December 31, 2016), subject to obtaining additional lender commitments. We may pay down and reborrow on this term loan. We may extend the maturity date twice, by one year each, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and payment of an extension fee.
We entered into the Senior Term Loan in connection with the KTR transaction and initially borrowed $1.0 billion. During 2016, we paid down the remaining balance and cancelled Senior Term Loan.
Secured Mortgage Debt
During 2016, we issued secured mortgage debt totaling $152.6 million. The debt has a stated interest rate of 3.3% (an effective interest rate of 3.5%) and matures in January 2022.
TMK bonds are a financing vehicle in Japan for special purposes companies known as TMKs. In 2016, we issued ¥25.7 billion ($244.6 million) of new TMK bonds and paid off or transferred substantially all of our outstanding TMK bonds leaving one TMK bond outstanding for ¥20.0 billion ($170.8 million at December 31, 2016). During 2015, we issued new TMK bonds totaling ¥23.0 billion ($191.0 million).
Debt Covenants
We have approximately $6.5 billion of senior notes and $1.5 billion of term loans outstanding at December 31, 2016, under three separate indentures, as supplemented, and are subject to certain financial covenants. We are also subject to financial covenants under our Credit Facilities and certain secured mortgage debt. At December 31, 2016, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
Long-Term Debt Maturities
Principal payments due on our debt, for each year through the period ending December 31, 2026, and thereafter were as follows at December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Unsecured
Credit
Senior
Secured
Maturity
Facilities
Notes
and Other
Mortgage Debt
2017 (1) (2)
194,150
428,196
622,346
175,000
961
570,291
781,275
618,294
1,084
446,360
1,065,738
831,071
1,190
428,725
1,260,986
1,237,871
1,012
141,548
1,380,431
737,870
427,886
163,172
1,328,928
850,000
874,916
174,624
1,899,540
911
133,308
872,089
976
134,727
885,703
527,050
696
1,223
528,969
5,368
1,161
6,529
6,465,026
1,509,150
2,623,335
10,632,534
Premiums (discounts), net
(19,573
43,286
23,713
(27,961
(9,843
(47,953
1,499,001
2,656,778
We expect to repay the amounts maturing in 2017 with cash generated from operations, proceeds from dispositions of wholly owned real estate properties, or as necessary, with borrowings on our Credit Facilities.
Included in 2017 maturities is the Euro Term Loan that can be extended until 2019.
The following table summarizes the components of interest expense for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
383,098
394,012
377,666
Amortization of premium, net
(30,596
(45,253
(21,440
Amortization of debt issuance costs
15,459
13,412
14,116
Interest expense before capitalization
367,961
362,171
370,342
(64,815
(60,808
(61,457
303,146
301,363
308,885
Total cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized
322,442
345,916
258,441
Early Extinguishment of Debt
In 2014 and 2015, we repurchased or repaid certain debt before the maturity date in an effort to reduce our borrowing costs and extend our debt maturities. As a result, we recognize gains or losses represented by the difference between the recorded debt (including premiums and discounts and related debt issuance costs) and the consideration we paid to retire the debt, including fees.
79
The following table summarizes the activity related to the repurchase of debt and net loss on early extinguishment of debt for the years ending December 31 (in millions):
Senior notes:
Original principal amount
709.7
1,290.4
Cash purchase price
789.0
1,460.3
Term loans:
600.0
Cash repayment price
Secured mortgage debt:
571.5
528.0
595.5
531.2
1,881.2
1,818.4
Cash purchase / repayment price
1,984.5
1,991.5
Losses on early extinguishment of debt
86.3
165.3
During 2016, we repaid certain debt at the earliest available payment date with no prepayment costs. As a result, we recorded a gain of $2.5 million, which related to premiums associated with the extinguished debt, net of remaining debt issuance costs.
Exchangeable Senior Notes
We had exchangeable senior notes that were issued by the Operating Partnership and were exchangeable into common stock of the Parent. The accounting for the exchangeable senior notes required us to separate the fair value of the derivative instrument (exchange feature) from the debt instrument and account for it separately as a derivative. During the reporting periods, any adjustments to the fair value of the derivative were recorded in earnings as Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses), Net. The derivative on the debt instrument was amortized over the term of the exchangeable notes. During March 2015, the holders of the exchangeable notes exchanged $459.8 million of their notes for 11.9 million shares of common stock of the Parent and $0.2 million of their notes for cash.
The fair value of the exchange option was $43.0 million immediately before the exchange in March 2015. When the debt was exchanged into common stock, the value of the derivative associated with the debt was reclassified to Additional Paid-In Capital. We recognized unrealized gains of $8.3 million during the first quarter of 2015 and unrealized losses of $10.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 on the change in fair value of the derivative instrument associated with the exchangeable debt.
NOTE 10. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY OF PROLOGIS, INC.
Shares Authorized
At December 31, 2016, 1.1 billion shares were authorized to be issued by the Parent, of which 1.0 billion shares represent common stock. Our board of directors (the “Board”) may, without stockholder approval, classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our stock from time to time by setting or changing the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption of such shares.
We issued 1.7 million and 3.3 million shares of common stock under our at-the-market program during 2015 and 2014, respectively, which generated $71.5 million and $140.1 million in net proceeds, respectively. We have an equity distribution agreement that allows us to sell up to $750.0 million aggregate gross sales proceeds of shares of common stock, of which $535.2 million remains available for sale, through six designated agents, who earn a fee of up to 2% of the gross proceeds, as agreed to on a transaction-by-transaction basis.
Under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), certain of our employees and outside directors are able to participate in equity-based compensation plans. See Note 13 for additional information on this plan. We received gross proceeds for the issuance of common stock upon the exercise of stock options of $39.5 million, $18.2 million and $25.8 million, for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectfully. See Note 13 for additional information on this plan.
Preferred Stock
At December 31, 2016, and 2015 our Series Q preferred stock outstanding had a dividend rate of 8.54%, and will be redeemable at our option on or after November 13, 2026. Holders have, subject to certain conditions, limited voting rights and all holders are entitled to receive cumulative preferential dividends based on liquidation preference. The dividends are payable quarterly in arrears on the last
day of each quarter. Dividends are payable when, and if, they have been declared by the Board, out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends.
Ownership Restrictions
For us to qualify as a REIT, five or fewer individuals may not own more than 50% of the value of our outstanding stock at any time during the last half of our taxable year. Therefore, our charter restricts beneficial ownership (or ownership generally attributed to a person under the REIT rules), by a person, or persons acting as a group, of issued and outstanding common and preferred stock that would cause that person to own or be deemed to own more than 9.8% (by value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our issued and outstanding capital stock. Furthermore, subject to certain exceptions, no person shall at any time directly or indirectly acquire ownership of more than 25% of any of the preferred stock. These provisions assist us in protecting and preserving our REIT status and protect the interests of stockholders in takeover transactions by preventing the acquisition of a substantial block of outstanding shares of stock.
Shares of stock owned by a person or group of people in excess of these limits are subject to redemption by us. The provision does not apply where a majority of the Board, in its sole and absolute discretion, waives such limit after determining that our status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes will not be jeopardized.
To comply with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, we are generally required to make common and preferred stock dividends (other than capital gain distributions) to our stockholders in amounts that together at least equal (i) the sum of (a) 90% of our “REIT taxable income” computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and net capital gains and (b) 90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property, minus (ii) certain excess non-cash income. Our common stock distribution policy is to distribute a percentage of our cash flow that ensures that we will meet the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and that allows us to also retain cash to meet other needs, such as capital improvements and other investment activities.
Our tax return for the year ended December 31, 2016, has not been filed. The taxability information presented for our dividends paid in 2016 is based on management’s estimate. Our tax returns for open tax years have not been examined by the Internal Revenue Service, other than those discussed in Note 14. Consequently, the taxability of dividends is subject to change.
In 2016, 2015 and 2014, we paid all of our dividends in cash. The following summarizes the taxability of our common and preferred stock dividends for the years ended December 31:
Common Stock:
Ordinary income
0.60
0.29
Qualified dividend
0.15
0.08
0.41
Capital gains
0.93
0.62
Total distribution
Preferred Stock – Series Q:
2.02
0.77
0.71
1.01
1.96
2.88
2.55
Total dividend
4.27
Taxability for 2016 is estimated.
Common stock dividends are characterized for federal income tax purposes as ordinary income, qualified dividend, capital gains, non-taxable return of capital or a combination of the four. Common stock dividends that exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits (calculated for tax purposes) constitute a return of capital rather than a dividend and generally reduce the stockholder’s basis in the common stock. To the extent that a dividend exceeds both current and accumulated earnings and profits and the stockholder’s basis in the common stock, it will generally be treated as a gain from the sale or exchange of that stockholder’s common stock. At the beginning of each year, we notify our stockholders of the taxability of the common stock dividends paid during the preceding year.
Pursuant to the terms of our preferred stock, we are restricted from declaring or paying any dividend with respect to our common stock unless and until all cumulative dividends with respect to the preferred stock have been paid and sufficient funds have been set aside for dividends that have been declared for the relevant dividend period with respect to the preferred stock.
NOTE 11. PARTNERS’ CAPITAL OF PROLOGIS, L.P.
Distributions paid to the common limited partnership units and the taxability of those distributions are similar to the Parent’s common stock disclosed above.
In May 2015, we issued 4.5 million common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership in connection with the KTR transaction. See Note 3 for more details on the transaction.
In connection with the acquisition of a portfolio of properties in October 2015, we issued 0.2 million common limited partnership units and 8.9 million Class A Units. The number of units issued was based upon an agreed upon price and had a per unit weighted average fair value at the date of issuance of $41.06. The Class A Units generally have the same rights as the existing common units of the Operating Partnership, except that the Class A Units are entitled to a quarterly distribution equal to $0.64665 per unit so long as the common units receive a quarterly distribution of at least $0.40 per unit (in the event the common units receive a quarterly distribution of less than $0.40 per unit, the Class A Unit distribution would be reduced by a proportionate amount). Class A Units are convertible into common units at an initial conversion rate of one-for-one. The conversion rate will be increased or decreased to the extent that, at the time of conversion, the net present value of the distributions paid with respect to the Class A Units are less or more than the distributions paid on common units from the time of issuance of the Class A Units until the time of conversion. At December 31, 2016, the Class A Units were convertible into 8.7 million common units. The Operating Partnership may redeem the Class A Units at any time after October 7, 2025, for an amount in cash equal to the then-current number of the common units into which the Class A Units are convertible, multiplied by $43.11, subject to the holders’ right to convert the Class A Units into common units.
Distributions paid on the common units and Class A Units, and the taxability of those distributions, are similar to dividends paid on the Parent’s common stock disclosed above.
NOTE 12. NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
We report noncontrolling interests related to several entities we consolidate but of which we do not own 100% of the equity. These entities include two real estate partnerships that have issued limited partnership units to third parties. Depending on the specific partnership agreements, these limited partnership units are redeemable for cash or, at our option into shares of the Parent’s common stock, generally at a rate of one share of common stock to one unit. We also consolidate several entities in which we do not own 100% of the equity and the units of these entities are not exchangeable into our common stock.
As discussed in Note 1, the Parent has complete responsibility, power and discretion in the day-to-day management of the Operating Partnership. The Parent, through its majority interest, has the right to receive benefits from and incur losses of the Operating Partnership. In addition, the Operating Partnership does not have either substantive liquidation rights or substantive kick-out rights without cause or substantive participating rights that could be exercised by a simple majority of noncontrolling interests. The absence of such rights renders the Operating Partnership as a VIE. Accordingly, the Parent is the primary beneficiary of and consolidates the Operating Partnership.
The noncontrolling interests of the Parent include the noncontrolling interests presented in the Operating Partnership, as well as the common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership that are not owned by the Parent.
The following table summarizes our ownership percentages and noncontrolling interests and the consolidated entities’ total assets and total liabilities at December 31 (dollars in thousands):
Our Ownership Percentage
Noncontrolling Interests
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture
55.0
2,424,800
2,677,642
6,201,278
6,788,968
797,593
847,084
Prologis North American Industrial
Fund (1)
66.1
486,648
490,444
2,479,072
2,619,241
1,038,708
1,165,617
Prologis Brazil Logistics Partners
Fund I (1) (2)
61,836
49,313
131,581
100,836
720
Other consolidated entities (3)
99,185
102,828
866,821
985,188
34,073
42,811
Prologis, L.P. noncontrolling
9,678,752
10,494,233
1,871,094
2,055,704
(4) (5)
394,590
432,674
Prologis, Inc. noncontrolling
These ventures are considered VIE’s under the new consolidation guidance discussed in Note 2. Based on our evaluation, the noncontrolling interests in these ventures do not hold substantive participating or kick-out rights and therefore as a group they
lack the power to direct the significant activities of these ventures that most significantly impact the venture’s economic performance. We have both the power to direct the significant activities and the obligation to absorb losses and the rights to receive benefits from these ventures. As a result, we are the primary beneficiary of both ventures and consistent with prior reporting periods, we consolidate each venture within our financial statements.
The assets of the Brazil Fund are primarily investments in unconsolidated entities of $113.1 million and $103.1 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For additional information on our unconsolidated investments, see Note 5.
This line item includes our two partnerships that have issued limited partnership units to third parties, as discussed above, along with various other consolidated entities. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, limited partnership units were exchangeable into cash or, at our option, 1.8 million shares of the Parent’s common stock. In 2015, 52 thousand limited partnership units were redeemed for cash of $3.2 million. All of these outstanding limited partnership units receive quarterly cash distributions equal to the quarterly dividends paid on our common stock pursuant to the terms of the applicable partnership agreements.
We had 8.9 million of Class A Units that were convertible into 8.7 million and 8.8 million common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. They were issued in the fourth quarter of 2015. See Note 11 for further discussion of our Class A Units.
At December 31, 2016 and 2015, excluding the Class A Units, there were common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership that were exchangeable into cash or, at our option, 4.6 million and 6.4 million shares of the Parent’s common stock with a fair value of $241.8 million and $275.0 million, respectively, based on the closing stock price of the Parent’s common stock. In 2015, we issued 4.7 million common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership, principally in connection with the KTR transaction, and in 2016 unitholders exchanged 1.9 million common limited partnership units into an equal number of shares of the Parent’s common stock with a value of $52.2 million. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were 2.2 million and 1.2 million LTIP Units (as defined in Note 13) outstanding, respectively, associated with our long-term compensation plan that are exchangeable into common units of the Operating Partnership and redeemable into the Parent’s common stock after they vest and other applicable conditions are met. All of these outstanding limited partnership units receive quarterly cash distributions equal to the quarterly distributions paid on our common stock pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement.
NOTE 13. LONG-TERM COMPENSATION
The 2012 LTIP provides for grants of awards to officers, directors, employees, and consultants of the Parent or its subsidiaries. Awards can be in the form of stock options (non-qualified options and incentive stock options), stock appreciation rights and full value awards (restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), Operating Partnership units (“LTIP Units”), special outperformance plan type of LTIP Units and cash incentive awards). An LTIP Unit represents a partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. After vesting and the satisfaction of certain conditions, an LTIP Unit may be exchangeable for a common unit in the Operating Partnership and then redeemable for a share of common stock (or cash at the election of the Operating Partnership). No participant can be granted more than 1.5 million shares of common stock under the 2012 LTIP in any one calendar year. Awards may be made under the 2012 LTIP until it is terminated by the Board or until the ten-year anniversary of the effective date of the plan.
We have 27.2 million shares reserved for issuance, of which 19.4 million shares of common stock were available for future issuance at December 31, 2016. Each LTIP Unit counts as one share of common stock for purposes of calculating the limit on shares that may be issued.
Prologis Outperformance Plan (“POP” formerly “OPP”)
We allocate participation points to participants under our POP corresponding to three-year performance periods beginning January 1. The fair value of the awards are measured at the beginning of the performance period and amortized over the applicable performance period. POP awards are earned to the extent our total stockholder return (“TSR”) for the performance period exceeds the TSR for the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) US REIT Index for the same period plus 100 basis points (the “Index”). If this outperformance hurdle is met, the compensation pool is equal to 3% of the excess value created, subject to a maximum of the greater of $75 million or 0.5% of our equity market capitalization at the start of the performance period. Each participant is eligible to receive a percentage of the total compensation pool based on the number of participation points allocated to the participant. If the performance criteria are met, the participants’ points will generally be paid in the form of common stock or POP LTIP Units (as discussed below). If the performance criteria are not met, the participants’ points will be forfeited. Awards earned cannot be paid to participants unless our absolute TSR, as defined in the plan, is positive for the performance period. If we outperform the Index, but the absolute TSR is not positive, payment will be delayed until such time as our absolute TSR becomes positive. If after seven years our absolute TSR has not become positive, the awards will be forfeited.
The POP was amended in 2016. Starting with the 2016 – 2018 performance period, if the relevant performance thresholds are met, participants can earn POP awards for their share of an aggregate performance pool up to $75 million. If earned, these POP awards will be paid after the end of the initial three-year performance period. If our levels of outperformance warrant an aggregate performance pool greater than $75 million, then participants can earn their share of the additional award amount in excess of $75 million up to the Capitalization Cap (the “Excess Award Amount”) during the course of a three-year period after the end of the initial performance period.
One-third of this Excess Award Amount can be earned at the end of each of the three years after the initial performance period, if our performance meets or exceeds the Index in each of such three years. POP continues to include certain positive TSR requirements, which must be met before participants can be paid awards under POP. In addition, participants will not be able to sell or transfer any equity they receive as initial or excess POP awards until three years after the end of the initial performance period. This amendment impacted the 2016 POP awards, but not the previously issued awards.
We use a Monte Carlo valuation model to value the points allocated under the POP. Participants can elect to choose the form of payment of awards earned, if any, in common stock of the Parent or POP LTIP Units. If and as elected by the participant, POP participation points are exchanged for POP LTIP Units. If the performance criteria are not met, the POP LTIP Units will be forfeited. At December 31, 2016, all awards are equity classified.
The following table details the assumptions using a Monte Carlo valuation model of each grant based on the year it was granted (dollars in thousands):
Risk free interest rate
0.99
0.86
0.67
Expected volatility
20.5
28.0
38.0
Aggregate fair value
26,600
26,500
23,100
The performance criteria was met for the 2014 – 2016 performance period, which resulted in an aggregate performance pool of $62.2 million awarded in January 2017 in the form of either vested RSUs or POP LTIP Units.
The performance criteria were not met for the 2012 – 2014 and 2013 – 2015 performance periods, therefore, no awards were earned and the awards were forfeited for such performance periods. As the POP has market-based performance criteria, there is no adjustment to the expense previously recognized at the completion of the performance period regardless of the outcome.
Prologis Promote Plan (“PPP”)
Under the PPP, we establish a compensation pool equal to 40% of the promotes earned by Prologis that represents the third-party portion of the promotes. The awards may be settled in some combination of cash, RSUs or for certain participants LTIP Units. The RSUs and LTIP Units have a three-year vesting period.
The following table details the equity awards granted under the PPP for the year ended December 31 (in thousands):
RSUs granted
Grant date fair value of RSUs granted
4,126
LTIP Units granted
197
113
Grant date fair value of LTIP Units granted
8,984
4,692
Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)
In addition to the RSUs granted under the PPP, we grant RSUs to certain employees, generally on an annual basis. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of common stock of the Parent and generally vests over a continued service period. The RSUs earn cash dividends during the vesting period and are, therefore, considered participating securities. We charge the value of the dividend to retained earnings. The fair value of the RSU is generally based on the market price of the Parent’s common stock on the date the award is granted and is charged to compensation expense over the service period, which is generally three years.
The following table summarizes the activity for RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2016 (units in thousands):
Number of RSUs
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Number of RSUs Vested
1,626
42.21
109
Granted
843
38.53
Vested and distributed
(807
41.70
Forfeited
41.08
1,617
40.58
Total remaining compensation cost related to RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2016, was $31.4 million, prior to adjustments for capitalized amounts due to our development and leasing activities. The remaining compensation cost will be recognized through 2019, with a weighted average period of 1.4 years.
Operating Partnership Long-Term Incentive Plan Units (“LTIP Units”)
LTIP Units are valued based on the market price of the Parent’s common stock on the date the award is granted and generally vest ratably over three years. Distributions are paid with respect to the LTIP Units during the vesting period and, therefore, such LTIP Units are considered participating securities. The value of the distribution is charged to Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests in the Operating Partnership.
The following table summarizes the activity for LTIP Units for the year ended December 31, 2016 (units in thousands):
Number of LTIP Units
Number of LTIP Units Vested
1,244
975
39.01
2,219
40.81
743
Total remaining compensation cost related to LTIP Units at December 31, 2016, was $38.6 million, prior to adjustments for capitalized amounts due to our development and leasing activities. The remaining compensation cost will be recognized through 2019, with a weighted average period of 1.4 years.
Prologis Outperformance Plan Operating Partnership Long-Term Incentive Plan Units (“POP LTIP Units” formerly “OPP LTIP Units”)
At December 31, 2016, we had 0.8 million, 1.4 million and 1.3 million POP LTIP Units outstanding for the 2016 – 2018, 2015 – 2017 and 2014 – 2016 performance periods, respectively. The following table summarizes the activity for the POP LTIP Units for the year ended December 31, 2016 (units in thousands):
Number of POP LTIP Units
3,464
(927
3,490
Stock Options
We have 2.1 million stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2016, with a weighted average exercise price of $36.14 and a weighted average life of 2.5 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercised options was $45.6 million, $13.7 million, and $5.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. No stock options were granted in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016.
Other Plans
The Prologis 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) provides for matching employer contributions of $0.50 for every dollar contributed by an employee, up to 6% of the employee’s annual compensation (within the statutory compensation limit). In the 401(k) Plan, vesting in the matching employer contributions is based on the employee’s years of service, with 100% vesting at the completion of one year of service. Our contributions under the matching provisions were $2.7 million, $2.5 million and $2.2 million for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
We have a non-qualified savings plan that allows highly compensated employees the opportunity to defer the receipt and income taxation of a certain portion of their compensation in excess of the amount permitted under the 401(k) Plan. There has been no employer matching in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016.
NOTE 14. INCOME TAXES
Components of Earnings Before Income Taxes
The following table summarizes the components of earnings before income taxes for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Domestic
719,018
511,025
390,874
International
628,086
437,580
322,754
Summary of Current and Deferred Income Taxes
The following table summarizes the components of the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Current income tax expense (benefit):
U.S. federal
7,153
(11,633
(6,585
38,493
27,494
52,155
State and local
14,443
12,286
16,014
Total current tax expense
60,089
28,147
61,584
(3,306
(810
(27,374
(2,219
(4,247
(59,866
Total deferred tax benefit
Current Income Taxes
Current income tax expense recognized during 2016 is principally due to tax triggered upon the contribution of assets to our Mexico and Japan co-investment ventures and third party sales from our U.S.TRS. Contributions to our co-investment ventures were not significant during 2015, as such there was a limited impact on current income tax expense. Current income tax expense during 2014 is principally due to taxes triggered upon the contribution of the initial portfolio of properties of certain wholly-owned and AFORES entities to FIBRA Prologis. Current income tax expense during 2015 and 2014 was netted against a current benefit recognized during each year as a result of the operating losses generated by our U.S. TRS.
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we recognized a net expense of $0.3 million and $3.0 million and a net benefit of $1.1 million for uncertain tax positions, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds, was $29.3 million, $24.1 million and $105.4 million, respectively.
Deferred Income Taxes
The deferred income tax benefits recognized in 2016, 2015 and 2014 were primarily due to a reduction in book basis of the real estate as compared to the tax basis and the reversal of deferred tax liabilities from the contribution and dispositions of properties. The deferred tax liabilities were originally recorded at the time of acquisition. The majority of the deferred tax benefit we recognized in 2014 was due to the reversal of deferred tax liabilities in connection with the initial contribution of properties to FIBRA Prologis and due to the expiration of the holding period on properties previously acquired with existing built-in-gains.
The following table summarizes the deferred income tax assets and liabilities at December 31 (in thousands):
Gross deferred income tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards (1)
350,909
321,144
Basis difference – real estate properties
56,827
89,856
Basis difference – equity investments and intangibles
15,593
Section 163(j) interest limitation
40,766
32,684
Capital loss carryforward
25,145
25,282
Other – temporary differences
5,578
8,993
Total gross deferred income tax assets
483,891
493,552
Valuation allowance
(456,699
(467,440
Gross deferred income tax assets, net of valuation allowance
27,192
26,112
Gross deferred income tax liabilities:
70,914
82,160
6,864
6,170
1,028
993
Total gross deferred income tax liabilities
78,806
89,323
Net deferred income tax liabilities
51,614
63,211
At December 31, 2016, we had NOL carryforwards as follows (in thousands):
Mexico
Gross NOL carryforward
97,565
640,431
371,284
115,154
48,318
Tax-effected NOL carryforward
36,597
162,067
117,633
23,001
11,611
(36,597
(146,684
(117,633
(23,001
(11,611
Net deferred tax asset – NOL
carryforward
15,383
Expiration periods
2023 – 2036
2017 – indefinite
2017 – 2027
2017 – 2025
The deferred tax asset valuation allowance at December 31, 2016, is adequate to reduce the total deferred tax asset to an amount that we estimate will more likely than not be realized.
Liability for Uncertain Tax Positions
During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we believe that we have complied with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. The statute of limitations for our tax returns is generally three years. As such, our tax returns that remain subject to examination would be primarily from 2013 and thereafter.
The liability for uncertain tax positions was $3.0 million, $3.3 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and principally consisted of estimated federal income tax liabilities and included accrued interest and penalties.
NOTE 15. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE OR UNIT
We determine basic earnings per share or unit based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock or units outstanding during the period. We compute diluted earnings per share or unit based on the weighted average number of shares or units outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average effect from all outstanding potentially dilutive instruments.
The computation of our basic and diluted earnings per share and unit for the years ended December 31 (in thousands, except per share and unit amounts) is as follows:
Net earnings attributable to common stockholders – Basic
Net earnings attributable to exchangeable limited partnership units (1)
37,079
13,120
3,636
Gains, net of expenses, associated with exchangeable debt assumed exchanged (2)
(1,614
Adjusted net earnings attributable to common stockholders – Diluted
1,240,297
874,294
625,871
Incremental weighted average effect on exchange of limited partnership units (1)
16,833
8,569
Incremental weighted average effect of equity awards and warrant
3,730
3,307
Incremental weighted average effect on exchangeable debt assumed exchanged (2)
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted (3)
Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic
Diluted
Net earnings attributable to Class A convertible common unitholders
(20,069
(3,393
Net earnings attributable to common unitholders – Basic
1,217,450
870,521
Net earnings attributable to exchangeable limited partnership units
1,994
1,435
Gain, net of expenses, associated with exchangeable debt assumed exchanged (2)
Adjusted net earnings attributable to common unitholders – Diluted
Weighted average common partnership units outstanding – Basic
Incremental weighted average effect on exchange of Class A convertible units
8,775
2,050
Incremental weighted average effect on exchange of limited partnership units
1,835
Incremental weighted average effect of equity awards and warrant of Prologis, Inc.
Weighted average common partnership units outstanding – Diluted (3)
Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders:
Earnings allocated to the exchangeable Operating Partnership units not held by the Parent have been included in the numerator and exchangeable Operating Partnership units have been included in the denominator for the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share for all periods as the per share and unit amount is the same.
In March 2015, the exchangeable debt was settled primarily through the issuance of common stock. The adjustment in 2015 assumes the exchange occurred on January 1, 2015.
Our total potentially dilutive shares and units outstanding consisted of the following:
Total weighted average potentially dilutive limited partnership units
10,610
3,898
1,932
Total potentially dilutive stock awards
8,444
7,299
14,366
Total weighted average potentially dilutive shares and units from exchangeable debt
11,879
Total Prologis, L.P.
19,054
13,370
28,177
6,223
4,671
1,766
Total Prologis, Inc.
25,277
18,041
29,943
88
NOTE 16. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to market risks, including the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To manage these risks, we may enter into various derivative contracts, such as foreign currency contracts to manage foreign currency exposure, and interest rate swaps to manage the effect of interest rate fluctuations. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All of our derivative financial instruments are customized derivative transactions and are not exchange-traded. Management reviews our hedging program, derivative positions and overall risk management strategy on a regular basis. We enter into only those transactions we believe will be highly effective at offsetting the underlying risk.
See Note 2 for additional information about our derivative financial instrument policy.
The following table presents the fair value and classification of our derivative instruments at December 31 (in thousands):
Asset
Liability
Net investment hedges
Canadian dollar denominated
1,245
Pound sterling denominated
7,439
33,471
Forwards and options
Euro denominated (1)
10,933
11,711
Pound sterling denominated (1)
16,985
4,241
745
Yen denominated (1)
9,246
1,071
Other (1)
831
3,324
Interest rate hedges
12,095
Total fair value of derivatives
As discussed in Note 2, these foreign currency contracts are not designated as hedges, with the exception of cash flow hedges denominated in pesos, which matured in 2016.
Foreign Currency
The following tables summarize the activity in our foreign currency contracts for the years ended December 31 (in millions, except for weighted average forward rates and number of active contracts):
Foreign Currency Contracts
Net Investment Hedges
Forwards and Options
Local Currency
GBP
EUR
Notional amounts at January 1
£
12,840
New contracts
133
90
11,189
15,460
Matured, expired or settled contracts
(297
(11,189
(470
(49
(12,800
Notional amounts at December 31
174
15,500
U.S. Dollar
Forwards and Options (1)
386
310
131
413
146
(471
(99
(526
(70
(111
Weighted average forward
rate at December 31
1.33
1.51
1.13
1.54
107.68
Active contracts at December 31
300
24,136
284
118
43,373
199
18,740
(394
(300
(118
(67,509
(102
(5,900
400
250
298
353
375
(298
(400
(200
(603
(419
(152
(50
600
1,746
79,010
365
(2,046
(79,010
800
2,354
769
464
(2,754
(769
(110
During 2016, 2015 and 2014, we exercised 49, 32 and 3 option contracts and realized gains of $3.0 million, $14.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses), Net.
We recognized unrealized gains of $19.1 million, $22.1 million and $7.7 million in Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses), Net from the change in value of our outstanding foreign currency option contracts for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
We had no ineffectiveness on our foreign currency derivative contracts during 2016, 2015 or 2014.
The following table summarizes the activity in our interest rate swaps for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
1,196
1,158
(925
(360
(71
271
We had three interest rate swaps hedges outstanding at December 31, 2016.
In January 2016, the Bank of Japan introduced negative interest rates. As a result, our two Japanese yen denominated interest rate hedges related to the 2015 yen term loan no longer qualified for hedge accounting due to a zero percent floor mismatch in the hedging relationship. These interest rate hedges were designated as cash flow hedges at December 31, 2015, and the change in fair value was recorded in Other Comprehensive Income. We began recording the change in fair value of these interest rate hedges to the Consolidated Statements of Income when the hedges no longer qualified for hedge accounting.
In August 2016, we entered into the Yen Term Loan and repaid our 2014, 2015 and 2016 yen term loans. At that time, we settled the outstanding contracts related to the previously outstanding term loans for $26.3 million. The fair value of the contracts that qualified for hedge accounting at the date of repayment was recorded to AOCI and will be amortized to Interest Expense over the life of the original term loans. We had $13.7 million remaining in AOCI at December 31, 2016. The change in fair value on the unhedged portion of the
contracts was recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded a loss of $9.9 million, respectively, in Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses), Net. See Note 9 for further discussion of the Yen Term Loan.
During 2015, we entered into two contracts with a notional amount of $526.3 million (¥65.0 billion) to effectively fix the interest rate on the 2015 yen term loan (see above for discussion on the settlement of these contracts) and three contracts with a notional amount of CAD $371.9 million ($271.2 million) to effectively fix the interest rate on the Canadian term loan. In the third quarter of 2015, we entered into two contracts with a notional amount of $360.0 million to effectively fix the interest rate at the three month LIBOR rate of 2.3% on expected future debt issuances. These contracts were settled in the fourth quarter of 2015 when we entered into $750.0 million of senior notes. We recorded a loss of $11.0 million associated with these derivatives that will be amortized to Interest Expense, in accordance with our policy.
During 2014, we entered into two contracts with a notional amount of $398.3 million (¥40.9 billion) to effectively fix the interest rate on the 2014 yen term loan. See above for discussion on the settlement of these contracts.
See Note 9 for more information on our term loans.
Other Comprehensive Income
The change in Other Comprehensive Income in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income during the periods presented is due to the translation on consolidation of the financial statements into U.S. dollars of our consolidated subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar for which we recorded losses of $304.0 million, $594.0 million and $614.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. It also includes the change in fair value for the effective portion of our derivative and nonderivative instruments that have been designated as hedges.
The following table presents the gains and (losses) associated with the change in fair value for the effective portion of our derivative and nonderivative hedging instruments included in Other Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Derivative net investment hedges (1)
55,460
63,934
122,164
Interest rate and cash flow hedges (2)
(551
(21,714
(804
Our share of derivatives from unconsolidated co-investment ventures
(798
4,257
(5,694
Total derivative instruments
54,111
46,477
115,666
Nonderivative net investment hedges (3)
112,591
321,148
321,196
Total derivative and nonderivative hedging instruments
166,702
367,625
436,862
We received $79.8 million, $128.2 million and $13.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, on the settlement of net investment hedges.
The amount reclassified to interest expense was $5.5 million for 2016 and for 2015 and 2014 the amounts were not considered significant. For the next 12 months from December 31, 2016, we estimate an additional expense of $5.4 million will be reclassified to Interest Expense.
At December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we had €3.2 billion ($3.4 billion), €3.2 billion ($3.5 billion) and €2.5 million ($3.0 billion) of debt, net of accrued interest, respectively, designated as nonderivative financial instrument hedges of our net investment in international subsidiaries. We had €97.6 million ($118.5 million) of debt that was not designated as a nonderivative financial instrument hedge at December 31, 2014. We recognized unrealized gains of $10.0 million and $7.7 million in Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses), Net on the unhedged portion of our debt for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. There were no unrealized gains or losses recognized for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Fair Value Measurements
We have estimated the fair value of our financial instruments using available market information and valuation methodologies we believe to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, accordingly, they are not necessarily indicative of amounts that we would realize on disposition. See Note 2 for more information on our fair value measurements policy.
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
At December 31, 2016 and 2015, other than the derivatives discussed previously, we did not have any significant financial assets or financial liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the Consolidated Financial Statements. All of our derivatives held at December 31, 2016 and 2015, were classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Fair Value Measurements on Nonrecurring Basis
No assets met the criteria to be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2016 or 2015.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the carrying amounts of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.
The differences in the fair value of our debt from the carrying value in the table below are the result of differences in interest rates or borrowing spreads that were available to us at December 31, 2016 and 2015, as compared with those in effect when the debt was issued or assumed, including reduced borrowing spreads due to our improved credit ratings. The senior notes and many of the issues of secured mortgage debt contain pre-payment penalties or yield maintenance provisions that could make the cost of refinancing the debt at lower rates exceed the benefit that would be derived from doing so.
The following table reflects the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our debt at December 31 (in thousands):
Carrying Value
Fair Value
35,061
Senior notes
6,935,485
6,801,118
Term loans and unsecured other
1,510,661
2,115,457
2,128,270
Secured mortgages
1,055,020
1,262,778
Secured mortgages of consolidated entities
1,683,489
1,825,361
11,219,716
12,017,527
NOTE 17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
A majority of the properties we acquire, including land, are subjected to environmental reviews either by us or the previous owners. In addition, we may incur environmental remediation costs associated with certain land parcels we acquire in connection with the development of the land. We have acquired certain properties that may have been leased to or previously owned by companies that discharged hazardous materials. We establish a liability at the time of acquisition to cover such costs and adjust the liabilities as appropriate when additional information becomes available. We record our environmental liabilities in Other Liabilities. We purchase various environmental insurance policies to mitigate our exposure to environmental liabilities. We are not aware of any environmental liabilities that would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Indemnification Agreements
We may enter into agreements whereby we indemnify certain co-investment ventures, or our venture partners, outside of the U.S. for taxes that may be assessed with respect to certain properties we contributed to these ventures. Our contributions to these ventures are generally structured as contributions of shares of companies that own the real estate assets. Accordingly, the capital gains associated with the step up in the value of the underlying real estate assets, for tax purposes, are deferred and transferred at contribution. We have generally indemnified these ventures to the extent that the ventures: (i) incur capital gains or withholding tax as a result of a direct sale of the real estate asset, as opposed to a transaction in which the shares of the company owning the real estate asset are transferred or sold or (ii) are required to grant a discount to the buyer of shares under a share transfer transaction as a result of the ventures transferring the embedded capital gain tax liability to the buyer of the shares in the transaction. The agreements limit the amount that is subject to our indemnification with respect to each property to 100% of the actual tax liabilities related to the capital gains that are deferred and transferred by us to the ventures at the time of the initial contribution less any deferred tax assets transferred with the property.
The outcome under these agreements is uncertain as it depends on the method and timing of dissolution of the related venture or disposition of any properties by the venture. We record liabilities related to the indemnification agreements in Other Liabilities. We continue to monitor these agreements and the likelihood of the sale of assets that would result in recognition and will adjust the potential liability in the future as facts and circumstances dictate.
Off-Balance Sheet Liabilities
We have issued performance and surety bonds and standby letters of credit in connection with certain development projects. Performance and surety bonds are commonly required by public agencies from real estate developers. Performance and surety bonds
are renewable and expire on the completion of the improvements and infrastructure. At December 31, 2016, and 2015 we had approximately $123.5 million and $131.1 million, respectively, outstanding under such arrangements.
We may be required under capital commitments or we may choose to make additional capital contributions to certain of our unconsolidated entities, representing our proportionate ownership interest, should additional capital contributions be necessary to fund development or acquisition costs, repayment of debt or operation shortfalls. See Note 5 for further discussion related to equity commitments to our unconsolidated entities.
Litigation
From time to time, we are party to a variety of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that, with respect to any such matters that we are currently a party to, the ultimate disposition of any such matter will not have material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 18. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Our current business strategy includes two operating segments: Real Estate Operations and Strategic Capital. We generate revenues, earnings, net operating income and cash flows through our segments, as follows:
Real Estate Operations. This operating segment represents the ownership and development of operating properties and is the largest component of our revenues and earnings. We collect rent from our customers through operating leases, including reimbursements for the majority of our property operating costs. Each operating property is considered to be an individual operating segment with similar economic characteristics; these properties are combined within the reportable segment based on geographic location. Our Real Estate Operations segment also includes development activities that lead to rental operations, including land held for development and properties currently under development. Within this line of business, we capitalize on the following: (i) the land that we currently own; (ii) the development expertise of our local teams; (iii) our customer relationships; and (iv) our in-depth knowledge in connection with our development activities. Land we own and lease to customers under ground leases is also included in this segment.
Strategic Capital. This operating segment represents the management of unconsolidated co-investment ventures. We generate strategic capital revenues from our unconsolidated co-investment ventures through asset management and property management services and we earn additional revenues by providing leasing, acquisition, construction, development, financing and disposition services. Depending on the structure of the venture and the returns provided to our partners, we also earn revenues through promotes during the life of a venture or upon liquidation. Each unconsolidated co-investment venture we manage is considered to be an individual operating segment with similar economic characteristics; these ventures are combined within the reportable segment based on geographic location.
Reconciliations are presented below for: (i) each reportable business segment’s revenues from external customers to Total Revenues; (ii) each reportable business segment’s net operating income from external customers to Operating Income and Earnings Before Income Taxes; and (iii) each reportable business segment’s assets to Total Assets. Our chief operating decision makers rely primarily on net operating income and similar measures to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing segment performance. The applicable components of Total Revenues, Operating Income, Earnings Before Income Taxes and Total Assets are allocated to each reportable business segment’s revenues, net operating income and assets. Items that are not directly assignable to a segment, such as certain corporate income and expenses, are not allocated but reflected as reconciling items. The following reconciliations are presented in thousands:
Real estate operations:
2,040,308
1,801,858
1,306,194
58,541
57,535
97,370
76,759
69,527
74,413
62,975
57,792
62,939
Total Real Estate Operations segment
2,238,583
1,986,712
1,540,916
Strategic capital:
39,360
39,396
84,178
22,288
10,990
185,495
112,793
86,549
46,920
35,885
38,154
Total Strategic Capital segment
Segment net operating income:
1,520,571
1,256,188
932,151
38,136
38,280
69,120
55,563
39,672
40,627
41,114
41,692
45,262
1,655,384
1,375,832
1,087,160
(1,622
(1,925
38,101
12,755
13,277
1,911
142,975
86,264
56,869
11,938
4,324
7,560
166,046
101,940
104,441
Total segment net operating income
1,821,430
1,477,772
1,191,601
Reconciling items:
Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation of equity
Assets:
21,286,422
22,030,457
978,476
919,381
1,346,589
1,291,991
936,462
1,157,401
24,547,949
25,399,230
Strategic capital (1):
18,090
19,363
47,635
49,960
1,301
2,005
67,026
71,328
Total segment assets
24,614,975
25,470,558
242,973
291,036
Total reconciling items
5,634,957
5,924,209
Represents management contracts and goodwill recorded in connection with business combinations associated with the Strategic Capital segment. Goodwill was $25.3 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015.
NOTE 19. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Our significant noncash investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 included the following:
We capitalized $25.8 million, $22.7 million and $21.6 million of equity-based compensation expense resulting from our development and leasing activities during 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
In 2016, we issued 1.9 million shares of the Parent’s common stock upon redemption of an equal number of common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership as disclosed in Note 12.
We received $135.3 million and $65.3 million of ownership interests in certain unconsolidated entities as a portion of our proceeds from the contribution of properties to these entities during 2016 and 2015, respectively.
During 2015, we assumed $290.7 million of secured mortgage debt in connection with the acquisition of real estate properties. Also, as partial consideration for the disposition of some properties acquired during 2015, the buyer assumed debt of $170.1 million.
In 2015, common limited partnership units were issued as partial consideration for the acquisition of properties as disclosed in Note 12.
See Notes 3, 9 and 12 for information related to the KTR transaction in May 2015.
We received $235.1 million of notes receivable backed by real estate in exchange for the disposition of real estate in 2015. See Note 7 for more information on our notes receivable backed by real estate.
Holders of our exchangeable senior notes exchanged the majority of their notes into common stock of the Parent in March 2015 as disclosed in Note 9.
As partial consideration for properties we contributed to FIBRA Prologis and the conclusion of an unconsolidated co-investment venture during 2014, we received equity valued at $609.7 million and FIBRA Prologis assumed $345.1 million of secured debt. See Note 4 for additional information about this transaction.
See Note 3 for information related to acquisitions of controlling interests in our unconsolidated co-investment ventures in 2014.
NOTE 20. SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
The following table details our selected quarterly financial data (in thousands, except per share and unit data):
Three Months Ended,
2016:
437,104
426,150
435,868
435,722
117,012
119,981
124,409
124,163
606,300
602,155
704,565
620,115
(146,581
(140,725
(140,514
(141,050
129,198
142,348
232,624
164,208
222,805
295,791
307,242
466,702
208,041
275,383
279,255
440,539
Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders –
Basic (1)
0.52
0.53
0.83
Diluted (1) (2)
0.82
2015:
324,547
357,828
418,116
435,626
94,255
103,616
114,639
124,560
462,847
510,404
580,622
643,201
(127,095
(125,820
(140,284
(150,983
83,881
87,348
103,392
105,551
351,312
140,260
307,186
126,757
345,206
140,240
258,979
118,363
0.27
0.49
0.23
214,275
283,699
286,943
452,602
Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders –
346,488
141,538
262,155
123,733
Quarterly earnings per common share or unit amounts may not total to the annual amounts due to rounding and the changes in the number of weighted common shares or units outstanding included in the calculation of basic and diluted shares or units.
Income allocated to the exchangeable Operating Partnership units not held by the Parent has been included in the numerator and exchangeable Operating Partnership units have been included in the denominator for the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share for all periods since the per share and unit is the same.
Under date of February 14, 2017, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related financial statement schedule, Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Schedule III). Schedule III is the responsibility of Prologis, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Schedule III based on our audits.
In our opinion, Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
Under date of February 14, 2017, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related financial statement schedule, Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Schedule III). Schedule III is the responsibility of Prologis, L.P.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Schedule III based on our audits.
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2016
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)
Initial Cost to
Costs
Capitalized
Gross Amounts at Which Carried
at December 31, 2016
No. of Bldgs.
Encum-
brances
Building &
Improvements
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
(a,b)
Depreciation
(c)
Date of
Construction/
Industrial Operating Properties (d)
North American Markets
United States:
Atlanta, Georgia
Atlanta Airport Distribution Center
(d)
4,759
13,591
998
14,589
19,348
(1,487
2014, 2015
Atlanta NE at Sugarloaf
620
2,499
2,572
3,192
(214
Atlanta NE Distribution Center
5,582
3,047
32,175
6,276
34,528
40,804
(20,201
1996, 1997
Atlanta South Business Park
5,353
28,895
4,341
33,236
38,589
(6,832
2011
Atlanta West Distribution Center
13,420
43,556
8,732
52,288
65,708
(9,893
1994, 2006, 2012, 2015
Berkeley Lake Distribution Center
2,046
8,712
1,204
9,916
11,962
(2,659
2006
Breckenridge Distribution Center
1,645
6,627
6,904
8,549
(555
Buford Distribution Center
2,659
8,847
6,101
14,948
17,607
(2,190
2007, 2015
Carter-Pacific Business Center
1,484
5,965
6,405
7,889
(712
Cobb Place Distribution Center
2,970
12,702
1,721
14,423
17,393
(2,439
Douglas Hill Distribution Center
11,599
46,826
4,820
11,677
51,568
63,245
(19,347
2005
Hartsfield East Distribution Center
697
6,466
654
7,120
7,817
(1,131
Horizon Distribution Center
7,364
36,015
1,659
37,674
45,038
(4,744
2006, 2015
Midland Distribution Center
1,919
7,679
1,547
9,226
11,145
(3,304
Northeast Industrial Center
2,821
12,176
1,707
13,883
16,704
(2,899
Northmont Industrial Center
566
3,209
1,741
4,950
5,516
(3,614
1994
Olympic Industrial Center
2,156
8,941
545
9,486
11,642
(1,088
Park I-75 South
11,393
18,808
35,508
11,406
54,303
65,709
(5,061
2013, 2015
Park I-85
6,391
11,585
26,264
6,465
37,775
44,240
(1,485
Peachtree Corners Business Center
5,750
20,670
3,960
24,630
30,380
(6,394
1994, 2015
Piedmont Ct. Distribution Center
885
5,013
4,269
9,282
10,167
(6,465
1997
Riverside Distribution Center (ATL)
16,600
4,462
3,329
21,039
24,368
(11,251
1999, 2014
Royal 85 Industrial Center
16,859
776
17,635
20,941
(1,081
Savannah Logistics Center
5,114
46,844
343
47,187
52,301
(2,665
Southfield-KRDC Industrial SG
1,551
8,621
524
9,145
10,696
(2,705
Southside Distribution Center
1,186
2,859
590
3,449
4,635
(952
Suwanee Creek Distribution Center
1,045
4,201
492
4,693
5,738
(791
2010, 2013
Tradeport Distribution Center
1,464
4,563
9,663
1,479
14,211
15,690
(8,957
1994, 1996
Weaver Distribution Center
935
5,182
2,439
7,621
8,556
(5,742
1995
Westfork Industrial Center
6,216
19,382
823
20,205
26,421
(1,306
116,202
436,940
158,848
117,099
594,891
711,990
(138,164
Austin, Texas
Corridor Park Corporate Center
4,579
18,358
18,980
23,559
(1,535
MET 4-12 LTD
4,300
20,456
20,750
25,050
(4,125
MET PHASE 1 95 LTD
5,593
17,211
1,519
18,730
24,323
(3,961
Montopolis Distribution Center
580
3,384
2,628
6,012
6,592
(4,882
Riverside Distribution Center (AUS)
1,849
7,195
7,288
9,137
Southpark Corporate Center
1,470
5,834
227
6,061
7,531
(484
Walnut Creek Corporate Center
11,152
46,510
1,643
11,206
48,099
59,305
(7,089
1994, 2014
29,523
118,948
7,026
29,577
125,920
155,497
(22,511
Baltimore/Washington DC
1901 Park 100 Drive
2,409
7,227
1,178
8,405
10,814
Airport Commons Distribution Center
2,320
10,671
2,360
10,631
12,991
(5,474
Beltway Distribution
9,211
33,922
909
34,831
44,042
(7,016
BWI Cargo Center E
10,725
10,840
(7,174
Corcorde Industrial Center
1,538
8,717
5,104
13,821
15,359
(9,946
Corridor Industrial Center
1,921
7,224
7,589
9,510
(1,515
Crysen Industrial Center
2,285
6,267
656
6,923
9,208
(1,599
Gateway Business Center
22,025
25,117
21,843
22,261
46,724
68,985
(4,062
2012, 2014
Gateway Distribution Center
2,523
5,715
5,217
3,163
10,292
13,455
(3,229
1998, 2012
Granite Hill Distribution Center
2,959
9,344
9,418
12,377
(2,413
Greenwood Industrial Center
6,828
24,253
2,912
27,165
33,993
(5,534
Hampton Central Distribution Center
8,928
26,787
27,877
36,805
(2,214
IAD Cargo Center 5
43,060
43,156
(39,338
Meadowridge Distribution Center
7,827
18,076
8,397
7,972
26,328
34,300
(4,959
1998, 2014
Meadowridge Industrial Center
4,845
20,576
4,564
25,140
29,985
(4,891
Patuxent Range Road
2,281
9,638
11,268
13,549
(2,490
Preston Court
2,326
10,146
10,477
12,803
(2,181
ProLogis Park - Dulles
16,703
35,291
36,145
52,848
(4,850
Troy Hill Distribution Center
9,179
30,415
741
31,156
40,335
(3,570
White Marsh Distribution Center
4,714
6,955
7,580
12,294
(256
110,822
339,455
67,372
111,883
405,766
517,649
(116,017
Central & Eastern, Pennsylvania
Carlisle Distribution Center
92,681
328,514
45,559
92,707
374,047
466,754
(38,465
2012, 2013, 2015
Chambersburg Distribution Center
4,188
17,796
17,934
22,122
(2,277
Harrisburg Distribution Center
30,801
122,169
5,554
127,723
158,524
(18,167
2004, 2013, 2015
Harrisburg Industrial Center
782
6,190
1,837
8,027
8,809
(3,776
2002
I-78 Distribution Center
13,030
30,007
444
30,451
43,481
(5,670
I-81 Distribution Center
1,822
21,583
21,960
23,782
(3,998
Kraft Distribution Center
7,450
22,457
22,477
29,927
(1,879
Lehigh Valley Distribution Center
32,520
88,519
50,908
32,782
139,165
171,947
(17,211
2004, 2010, 2013, 2014, 2015
Northport Industrial Center
12,282
37,910
50,192
(3,199
Park 33 Distribution Center
28,947
47,081
41,468
31,231
86,265
117,496
(12,094
2007,2014
PHL Cargo Center C2
11,966
12,053
(6,738
Quakertown Distribution Center
6,966
28,369
35,335
(7,035
231,469
734,192
174,761
234,041
906,381
1,140,422
(120,509
Central Valley, California
Arch Road Logistics Center
9,492
38,060
2,314
40,374
49,866
(8,729
2010
Central Valley Distribution Center
4,329
25,033
25,918
30,247
(2,205
Central Valley Industrial Center
13,064
58,080
9,062
13,473
66,733
80,206
(26,734
1999, 2002, 2005, 2014
Chabot Commerce Center
5,222
13,697
7,731
21,428
26,650
(6,173
Duck Creek Distribution Center
6,690
37,858
44,548
(3,048
Manteca Distribution Center
9,280
27,840
9,480
28,309
37,789
(10,673
Patterson Pass Business Center
14,225
19,547
96,523
17,267
113,028
130,295
(7,398
2007, 2012, 2015, 2016
Tracy II Distribution Center
23,905
32,080
152,941
29,246
179,680
208,926
(31,106
2007, 2009, 2012, 2013
86,207
252,195
270,125
95,199
513,328
608,527
(96,066
Charlotte, North Carolina
Charlotte Distribution Center
6,596
8,206
30,225
8,114
36,913
45,027
(18,116
1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2014
Northpark Distribution Center
1,183
6,707
3,287
1,184
9,993
11,177
(6,977
1994, 1998
West Pointe Business Center
12,832
39,809
20,969
13,134
60,476
73,610
(8,672
2006, 2012, 2014, 2015
20,611
54,722
54,481
22,432
107,382
129,814
(33,765
Chicago, Illinois
Addison Business Center
2,907
536
3,443
4,736
(835
Addison Distribution Center
2,594
11,779
2,295
14,074
16,668
(4,012
1997, 2015
Alsip Distribution Center
4,895
9,710
9,960
14,855
(691
Arlington Heights Distribution Center
5,263
10,361
3,568
5,264
13,928
19,192
Aurora Distribution Center
9,921
53,571
55,216
65,137
(4,509
Bedford Park Distribution Center
3,014
9,271
359
9,630
12,644
(697
Bensenville Distribution Center
3,842
6,429
940
10,257
11,197
(7,769
Bensenville Industrial Park
43,455
111,007
9,495
120,502
163,957
(24,998
2011, 2015
Bloomingdale 100 Business Center
6,563
26,145
1,784
27,929
34,492
(2,262
Bolingbrook Distribution Center
40,219
154,530
28,173
182,703
222,922
(29,862
1999, 2006, 2014, 2015
Bridgeview Distribution Center
6,882
7,052
8,714
(895
Chicago Industrial Portfolio
1,330
2,876
428
3,304
4,634
(940
Cicero Distribution Center
3,789
5,819
849
6,668
10,457
(762
Des Plaines Distribution Center
8,022
17,145
4,129
8,023
21,273
29,296
(8,745
1995, 1996, 2015
Elgin Distribution Center
2,480
6,422
7,276
9,756
(404
Elk Grove Distribution Center
37,200
81,638
41,879
123,517
160,717
(48,437
1995, 1996, 1997, 1999, 2006, 2009, 2015
Elk Grove Du Page
14,830
64,408
13,911
78,319
93,149
(17,943
Elk Grove Village SG
5,856
11,049
12,533
18,389
(3,484
Elmhurst Distribution Center
1,862
3,263
472
3,735
5,597
(197
Franklin Park Distribution Center
22,998
49,906
50,711
73,709
(2,516
Glendale Heights Distribution Center
8,381
39,047
5,895
44,942
53,323
(17,374
1999, 2015
Grand Rapids Distribution Center
839
1,516
1,532
2,371
(77
Gurnee Distribution Center
2,353
5,579
5,877
8,230
(385
I-55 Distribution Center
5,383
25,504
36,018
11,786
55,119
66,905
(19,352
2007
Itasca Distribution Center
1,222
5,178
1,077
6,255
7,477
(806
Itasca Industrial Portfolio
1,044
1,920
229
2,149
3,193
(545
Kehoe Industrial Center
2,975
8,421
11,396
(1,013
Kennicott Park Distribution Center
811
2,996
3,020
3,831
(221
Kenosha Distribution Center
14,484
117,728
521
118,249
132,733
(5,085
McCook Distribution Center
1,968
6,784
7,065
9,033
(333
Melrose Park Distribution Center
9,544
27,851
488
28,339
37,883
(1,390
Minooka Distribution Center
18,420
67,250
18,437
19,404
84,703
104,107
(23,238
2005, 2008, 2014
Mitchell Distribution Center
1,236
7,004
4,355
11,359
12,595
(7,913
1996
Mount Pleasant Distribution Center
8,171
574
8,745
11,621
(399
NDP - Chicago
1,362
1,440
1,901
(294
Northbrook Distribution Center
2,056
8,227
4,015
12,242
14,298
(3,532
Northlake Distribution Center
5,015
13,569
13,694
18,709
(760
OHare Industrial Portfolio
3,455
8,724
216
8,940
12,395
(2,387
Palatine Distribution Center
2,723
3,022
3,519
Pleasant Prairie Distribution Center
3,293
16,321
3,597
19,918
23,211
(7,053
Remington Lakes Distribution Center
11,657
901
12,558
14,940
(2,210
Romeoville Distribution Center
30,559
116,956
11,527
128,483
159,042
(38,273
2005, 2015
S.C. Johnson & Son
2,267
15,911
1,842
3,152
16,868
20,020
(4,287
2008
Shiller Park Distribution Center
17,339
33,001
3,350
36,351
53,690
(2,363
Touhy Cargo Terminal
2,697
8,909
11,606
(1,503
Tower Distribution Center
1,279
1,284
3,334
(62
Waukegan Distribution Center
2,451
9,438
506
9,944
(3,260
West Chicago Distribution Center
3,125
12,764
4,971
17,735
20,860
(6,425
Willowbrook Distribution Center
3,134
3,157
4,012
(337
Windsor Court
3,493
4,029
4,664
(880
Woodale Distribution Center
263
1,490
599
2,089
2,352
(1,454
Woodridge Distribution Center
49,943
215,504
27,177
53,310
239,314
292,624
(83,241
2005, 2007, 2015
Yohan Industrial Center
4,219
12,306
1,685
13,991
18,210
(2,937
189
423,270
1,463,703
249,725
434,925
1,701,773
2,136,698
(402,301
Cincinnati, Ohio
Airpark Distribution Center
5,851
21,846
15,049
6,831
35,915
42,746
(10,495
1996, 2012, 2014
DAY Cargo Center
4,749
5,420
(2,388
Fairfield Commerce Center
2,526
10,110
10,215
12,741
(870
Gateway International Distribution Center
2,676
18,534
2,695
18,515
21,210
(445
Monroe Park
7,222
29,606
30,112
37,334
(2,547
Mosteller Distribution Center
3,888
4,053
4,974
(379
Park I-275
15,939
61,886
3,815
65,701
81,640
(9,244
2008, 2012, 2014
Sharonville Distribution Center
1,202
15,838
2,424
14,616
17,040
(7,486
West Chester Commerce Park I
3,366
13,877
17,080
20,446
(2,581
39,703
145,962
57,886
41,924
201,627
243,551
(36,435
Columbus, Ohio
Alum Creek Distribution Center
3,945
33,239
33,560
37,505
(1,871
Brookham Distribution Center
5,964
23,858
5,130
28,987
34,952
(12,576
Capital Park South Distribution Center
10,077
39,631
32,697
10,470
71,935
82,405
(24,153
Columbus West Industrial Center
427
2,407
202
2,609
3,036
Corporate Park West
3,583
3,672
4,305
(327
Crosswinds Distribution Center
3,058
17,758
500
18,258
21,316
(1,666
Etna Distribution Center
5,840
33,734
1,055
34,789
40,629
(2,954
International Street Commerce Center
1,503
6,356
483
6,839
8,342
(1,312
South Park Distribution Center
3,343
15,182
3,627
18,809
22,152
(9,453
1999, 2005
Westpointe Distribution Center
7,601
1,764
9,365
10,811
(4,312
36,236
183,349
45,868
36,630
228,823
265,453
(58,922
Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas
Arlington Corporate Center
9,380
41,744
42,194
51,574
(5,320
2012, 2014, 2015
Dallas Corporate Center
6,449
5,441
35,845
6,645
41,090
47,735
(21,109
1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2012
Dallas Corporate Center North Distribution Center
6,014
20,152
5,990
20,176
26,166
(301
DFW Cargo Center 1
35,117
36,401
(8,082
DFW Cargo Center 2
27,916
221
28,137
(5,964
DFW Cargo Center East
19,730
367
20,097
(7,001
DFW Logistics Center 6
2,010
8,153
8,733
10,743
(418
Flower Mound Distribution Center
5,157
20,991
2,588
23,579
28,736
(8,198
Frankford Trade Center
27,530
807
28,337
35,219
(938
Freeport Corporate Center
15,965
63,935
9,665
15,872
73,693
89,565
(9,737
Freeport Distribution Center
1,393
5,549
6,289
11,791
13,231
(7,219
1996, 1997, 1998
Gold Spike Distribution Center
3,629
18,094
21,723
Great Southwest Corporate Center
4,476
455
18,813
23,289
(1,625
Great Southwest Distribution Center
44,349
190,068
26,195
44,454
216,158
260,612
(67,964
1995, 1996, 1997, 1999, 2000, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2015
Greater Dallas Industrial Portfolio
3,525
16,375
1,713
18,088
21,613
(4,066
Heritage Business Park
20,153
93,145
29,179
122,324
142,477
(5,187
Lonestar Portfolio
2,396
7,839
2,774
10,613
13,009
(2,655
Mesquite Distribution Center
34,609
1,247
35,856
44,211
(4,450
Northgate Distribution Center
13,001
62,062
9,361
13,488
70,936
84,424
(23,775
1999, 2005, 2008, 2012, 2014
Park 121 Distribution Center
6,888
14,628
7,662
13,854
21,516
Riverside Drive Distribution Center
5,107
14,919
14,993
20,100
(1,020
ST Micro Distribution Center
2,429
17,317
4,026
15,720
19,746
(96
Stemmons Distribution Center
272
1,544
1,018
2,562
2,834
(1,887
Stemmons Industrial Center
1,653
10,526
6,697
17,223
18,876
(12,552
1994, 1995, 1996, 1999
Trinity Mills Distribution Center
735
3,774
1,114
4,888
5,623
(2,907
1999
Valwood Business Center
4,679
19,195
1,762
20,957
25,636
(6,034
2001, 2006, 2014
Valwood Distribution Center
4,742
20,629
1,860
22,489
27,231
(5,039
Valwood Industrial Center
1,802
9,658
958
10,616
12,418
(2,564
Watersridge Distribution Center
1,939
11,365
11,468
13,407
(622
183,380
770,172
212,797
186,469
979,880
1,166,349
(217,281
Denver Business Center
3,142
13,396
14,226
17,368
(2,507
Havana Distribution Center
1,421
5,657
330
5,987
7,408
(700
Pagosa Distribution Center
2,322
1,993
4,315
4,713
(3,249
1993
Peoria Distribution Center
16,593
16,753
20,882
(1,392
Stapleton Business Center North
8,930
32,664
7,230
34,364
41,594
(1,869
Stapleton Business Center
34,634
139,257
12,215
34,635
151,471
186,106
(58,668
Upland Distribution Center
4,064
19,035
6,180
4,077
25,202
29,279
(7,295
1994, 1995, 2014
Upland Distribution Center II
1,396
5,349
2,183
1,409
7,519
(3,465
1993, 2014
58,114
201,609
56,555
56,441
259,837
316,278
(79,145
Houston, Texas
Avondale Distribution Center
2,231
5,044
5,495
7,726
(306
Blalock Distribution Center
5,032
21,983
3,340
5,031
25,324
30,355
(6,747
2002, 2012
Cole Creek Distribution Center
3,865
22,534
22,832
26,697
(1,111
IAH Cargo Center 1
13,267
546
13,813
(1,813
Jersey Village Corporate Center
17,971
73,062
2,905
17,830
76,108
93,938
(9,957
Kempwood Business Center
9,894
3,819
13,713
(7,878
2001
15,015
37,139
36,813
73,952
88,967
(10,763
2006, 2008, 2012, 2013, 2014
Perimeter Distribution Center
4,604
1,131
5,666
6,411
(3,443
Pine Forest Business Center
6,042
27,639
9,861
37,500
43,542
(18,792
1993, 1995, 2014
Pine North Distribution Center
847
4,800
2,067
6,867
7,714
(3,889
Pinemont Distribution Center
642
1,153
4,789
5,431
(2,976
Post Oak Business Center
2,334
11,655
10,351
22,006
24,340
(16,351
1993, 1994, 1996
Post Oak Distribution Center
1,522
8,758
6,560
15,318
16,840
(11,915
1993, 1994
Satsuma Station Distribution Center
3,088
22,389
190
22,579
25,667
(1,018
South Loop Distribution Center
4,228
4,646
(3,106
Sugarland Corporate Center
3,506
14,067
123
14,190
17,696
(1,173
West by Northwest Industrial Center
11,316
46,372
4,386
11,456
50,618
62,074
(9,179
1993, 1994, 2012, 2014
White Street Distribution Center
469
2,656
2,544
5,200
5,669
(3,797
Wingfoot Distribution Center
1,976
8,606
3,480
12,086
14,062
(2,229
2012, 2013
World Houston Distribution Center
1,529
6,326
6,417
7,946
(950
80,225
346,374
92,394
80,292
438,701
518,993
(117,393
Indianapolis, Indiana
Airport Business Center
1,667
6,445
6,909
8,576
(577
Airtech Park
7,305
29,001
467
29,468
36,773
(2,464
Eastside Distribution Center
1,187
2,255
3,371
3,670
(2,188
North by Northeast Corporate Center
1,058
9,302
1,059
9,301
10,360
(5,718
North Plainfield Park Distribution Center
8,562
34,778
34,881
43,443
(2,925
Park 100 Industrial Center
9,360
38,402
23,790
62,192
71,552
(27,240
1995, 2012
Park 267
3,705
15,695
948
16,643
20,348
(1,293
Shadeland Industrial Center
2,431
3,459
429
5,889
6,318
(4,225
32,313
127,939
40,788
32,386
168,654
201,040
(46,630
Jacksonville, Florida
JAX Cargo Center
2,892
3,068
(1,423
Kansas City, Kansas
MCI Cargo Center 1
2,781
278
3,059
(2,026
MCI Cargo Center 2
11,630
(3,975
14,411
14,689
(6,001
Las Vegas, Nevada
Arrowhead Commerce Center
30,075
82,214
2,599
84,813
114,888
(4,433
Cameron Business Center
1,963
3,626
3,969
5,932
(206
Las Vegas Corporate Center
23,118
51,157
1,846
13,656
62,465
76,121
(3,813
Montessouri Distribution Center
1,039
2,967
2,982
4,021
(184
North 15 Freeway Distribution Center
2,638
9,887
1,731
2,655
11,601
14,256
Pama Distribution Center
2,223
5,695
5,773
7,996
(292
Sunrise Industrial Park
21,499
92,503
19,237
21,611
111,628
133,239
(13,142
2011, 2013, 2014, 2016
Valley View Distribution Center
2,420
258
2,686
Warm Springs Distribution Center
8,897
39,055
606
39,661
48,558
(2,104
West One Business Center
2,468
13,985
5,614
19,599
22,067
(13,436
96,340
301,347
32,077
87,007
342,757
429,764
(37,845
Louisville, Kentucky
Cedar Grove Distribution Center
20,697
105,257
20,696
109,496
130,192
(17,257
2005, 2008, 2012, 2015
Commerce Crossings Distribution Center
1,912
7,933
9,845
(3,018
I-65 Meyer Distribution Center
9,557
32,334
25,882
9,864
57,909
67,773
(11,615
2006, 2012, 2015
New Cut Road Distribution Center
2,711
11,694
803
12,497
15,208
(2,436
River Ridge Distribution Center
8,102
69,329
69,632
77,734
(3,044
42,979
226,263
31,510
43,285
257,467
300,752
(37,370
Memphis, Tennessee
Delp Distribution Center
1,068
10,546
1,036
11,582
12,650
(8,384
DeSoto Distribution Center
7,225
4,136
35,967
6,778
40,550
47,328
(9,042
2007, 2014
Memphis Industrial Park
3,252
14,448
1,693
16,141
19,393
(3,114
Olive Branch Distribution Center
6,719
31,134
31,577
38,296
(6,611
Willow Lake Distribution Center
613
3,474
4,196
(2,313
18,877
63,738
39,248
18,430
103,433
121,863
(29,464
Nashville, Tennessee
CentrePointe Distribution Center
7,507
15,042
16,220
9,067
29,702
38,769
(1,801
2013, 2016
Elam Farms Park
2,097
8,386
1,928
10,314
12,411
(1,758
I-40 Industrial Center
3,075
15,333
5,611
20,944
24,019
(9,101
1995, 1996, 1999, 2012
Interchange City Distribution Center
11,460
49,472
6,184
55,656
67,116
(8,538
1999, 2012, 2014
Nashville North Distribution Center
6,194
44,587
45,426
51,620
(2,479
Southpark Distribution Center
11,834
47,335
1,583
48,918
60,752
(5,019
42,167
180,155
32,365
43,727
210,960
254,687
(28,696
New Jersey/New York
Brunswick Distribution Center
870
4,928
3,665
8,593
9,463
(5,681
Carteret Distribution Center
39,148
109,124
892
110,016
149,164
(6,225
CenterPoint Distribution Center
2,839
12,490
1,851
14,341
17,180
(3,314
Clifton Distribution Center
8,064
12,096
2,555
14,651
22,715
(3,165
Cranbury Business Park
43,056
91,129
4,561
95,690
138,746
(13,029
Dellamor
6,710
35,478
2,669
38,147
44,857
(9,617
Docks Corner SG (Phase II)
16,232
19,264
7,270
26,534
42,766
(9,747
Edison Distribution Center
30,610
52,190
11,042
63,232
93,842
(1,789
Elizabeth Seaport II
37,325
38,131
40,896
34,560
75,456
Exit 10 Distribution Center
35,289
147,492
12,715
160,207
195,496
(53,850
Exit 7 Distribution Center
35,728
117,157
753
117,910
153,638
(5,139
Exit 8A Distribution Center
21,164
85,257
4,876
90,133
111,297
(20,304
2005, 2014
Franklin Commerce Center
9,304
23,768
502
24,270
33,574
(4,090
Gourmet Lane Distribution Center
13,099
23,539
1,167
24,706
37,805
(856
Highway 17 55 Madis
2,937
13,477
1,115
14,592
17,529
(3,582
Interstate Distribution Center
30,188
76,705
902
77,607
107,795
(3,682
JFK Cargo Center 75_77
35,916
5,489
41,405
(19,902
Kilmer Distribution Center
14,313
5,007
19,320
(12,851
Liberty Log Center
3,273
24,029
372
24,401
27,674
(3,771
Linden Industrial Center
17,332
24,264
1,397
25,661
42,993
(920
Lister Distribution Center
16,855
21,802
1,422
23,224
40,079
(768
Maspeth Distribution Center
23,784
10,849
11,127
34,911
(364
Meadow Lane
6,388
6,415
7,451
(1,518
Meadowland Distribution Center
26,379
83,224
7,428
90,652
117,031
(25,559
Meadowland Industrial Center
4,190
13,469
20,655
34,124
38,314
(22,140
1996, 1998
Meadowlands ALFII
3,972
18,895
3,427
22,322
26,294
(4,846
Meadowlands Park
6,898
41,471
1,998
43,469
50,367
(10,405
Mooncreek Distribution Center
3,319
13,422
13,437
16,756
(3,429
Murray Hill Parkway
12,040
12,565
15,472
Newark Airport I and II
19,045
21,936
22,837
41,882
(1,882
Orchard Hill
678
3,756
3,776
4,454
(955
Pennsauken Distribution Center
959
655
1,603
1,806
(958
Perth Amboy Corporate Park
54,701
66,534
4,365
70,899
125,600
(2,554
Port Reading Business Park
211,931
256,740
119,387
201,814
386,244
588,058
(27,772
2005, 2014, 2015
Ports Jersey City Distribution Center
34,133
61,057
34,504
60,686
95,190
(4,454
Portview Commerce Center
9,577
21,581
19,134
9,798
40,494
50,292
(5,710
2011, 2012
Secaucus Distribution Center
9,603
26,905
36,508
(3,142
Skyland Crossdock
9,831
1,308
11,139
South Jersey Distribution Center
6,912
17,437
17,653
24,565
(2,317
Teterboro Meadowlands 15
18,169
34,604
226
34,830
52,999
Two South Middlesex
4,389
8,410
1,030
9,440
13,829
(2,408
814,364
1,585,964
377,910
808,421
1,969,817
2,778,238
(314,169
Orlando, Florida
Beltway Commerce Center
18,835
25,526
15,316
18,840
40,837
59,677
(7,093
2008, 2015
Chancellor Distribution Center
2,157
2,615
4,772
5,152
(3,391
Chancellor Square
2,087
9,708
687
13,428
14,115
(2,928
Consulate Distribution Center
6,105
31,550
3,419
34,969
41,074
(16,254
Crowne Pointe Park
7,497
1,592
9,089
12,977
(434
Davenport Distribution Center
934
3,991
4,093
5,027
(763
Lake Mary Logistics Center
1,374
5,101
5,286
6,660
(277
Orlando Airport Park
5,259
17,025
5,724
16,560
22,284
(104
Orlando Central Park
1,398
5,977
416
6,393
7,791
(1,378
Orlando Corporate Center
8,061
33,030
34,574
42,635
(3,061
Presidents Drive
6,845
31,180
4,240
35,420
42,265
(8,892
Sand Lake Service Center
3,704
19,546
4,035
23,581
27,285
(5,793
58,870
175,263
52,809
57,940
229,002
286,942
(50,368
Phoenix, Arizona
24th Street Industrial Center
503
2,852
2,042
561
4,836
5,397
(3,781
Alameda Distribution Center
3,872
14,358
3,184
17,542
21,414
(6,945
Brookridge Distribution Center
3,897
15,153
241
15,394
19,291
(1,357
Hohokam 10 Business Center
1,317
7,468
1,581
1,318
9,048
10,366
(5,355
Kyrene Commons Distribution Center
1,093
5,475
2,909
8,384
9,477
(5,550
1992, 1998, 1999
Papago Distribution Center
4,828
20,017
5,275
4,829
25,291
30,120
(11,790
1994, 2005
Phoenix Distribution Center
1,441
1,026
6,604
8,045
(978
Sky Harbor Distribution Center
14,023
2,714
16,737
(336
University Dr Distribution Center
683
2,735
3,560
4,243
(1,298
Watkins Street Distribution Center
1,375
801
2,175
2,418
(1,496
Wilson Drive Distribution Center
1,273
5,093
992
6,085
7,358
(2,499
19,149
94,127
21,590
19,210
115,656
134,866
(41,385
Portland, Oregon
Clackamas Distribution Center
8,828
28,192
28,782
37,610
PDX Cargo Center Airtrans
13,943
(4,284
PDX Corporate Center East
7,126
21,303
21,655
28,781
(1,743
PDX Corporate Center North Phase II
(d)(e)
10,293
25,461
27,616
37,909
(4,266
2008, 2014
Portland Northwest Corporate Park
13,666
40,999
42,067
55,733
(2,171
Southshore Corporate Center
24,173
11,154
8,143
36,664
44,807
(6,029
2006, 2014, 2015
49,393
153,825
15,565
48,056
170,727
218,783
(21,400
Reno, Nevada
Damonte Ranch Distribution Center
8,764
36,766
38,083
46,847
(6,238
Golden Valley Distribution Center
13,686
4,237
2,415
16,448
18,863
(5,720
Reno Aircenter
544
12,292
1,686
13,978
14,522
(571
RNO Cargo Center 10_11
4,670
(1,658
Sage Point Business Park
1,705
6,821
457
7,278
8,983
(368
Stead Distribution Center
1,046
19,330
19,937
20,983
Tahoe-Reno Industrial Center
6,705
30,381
59,889
6,704
90,271
96,975
(8,571
Vista Industrial Park
5,923
26,807
10,940
37,747
43,670
(20,665
1994, 2001
25,627
150,348
79,538
27,101
228,412
255,513
(44,722
San Antonio, Texas
Coliseum Distribution Center
1,607
6,548
6,642
8,249
(565
Cornerstone Distribution Center
2,386
14,610
16,996
(191
Director Drive Distribution Center
1,271
5,455
5,754
7,025
(1,268
Downtown Distribution Center
579
2,347
2,926
Eisenhauer Distribution Center
5,042
21,383
22,975
28,017
(3,625
Interchange East Distribution Center
1,496
6,535
234
6,769
8,265
(1,872
Macro Distribution Center
4,887
17,282
19,817
(6,481
2002, 2014
Perrin Creek Corporate Center
9,770
40,193
1,526
41,719
51,489
(5,552
Rittiman East Industrial Park
4,848
19,223
3,292
22,515
27,363
(8,173
San Antonio Distribution Center II
7,893
8,778
(4,834
San Antonio Distribution Center III
3,154
12,876
211
13,087
16,241
(1,526
Tri-County Distribution Center
27,718
2,269
6,889
29,986
36,875
(5,729
40,248
154,673
37,120
40,462
191,579
232,041
(40,022
San Francisco Bay Area, California
Acer Distribution Center
3,368
15,139
15,416
18,784
(3,777
Alvarado Business Center
20,739
62,595
7,995
70,590
91,329
(27,825
Bayshore Distribution Center
6,450
2,696
17,745
24,195
(4,679
Bayside Corporate Center
23,031
27,396
(14,496
1995, 1996
Bayside Plaza I
5,212
18,008
9,688
5,216
27,692
32,908
(20,122
Bayside Plaza II
634
3,931
4,565
Boyce Distribution Center
21,719
35,182
22,360
34,541
56,901
(447
Brennan Distribution Center
7,553
7,678
9,590
(1,842
Component Drive Industrial Portfolio
2,829
13,532
785
14,317
17,146
(3,489
Cypress
1,065
5,103
252
5,355
6,420
(1,275
Dado Distribution Center
2,194
11,079
283
11,362
13,556
(2,900
Doolittle Distribution Center
2,843
18,849
1,672
20,521
23,364
(4,272
Dowe Industrial Center
5,884
20,400
912
21,312
27,196
Dublin Industrial Portfolio
3,241
15,951
17,022
20,263
East Bay Doolittle
15,988
1,794
17,782
21,797
(4,765
East Grand Airfreight
43,310
43,350
7,435
50,785
94,095
(5,017
2011, 2015, 2016
Edgewater Industrial Center
6,630
31,153
34,493
41,123
(8,615
Eigenbrodt Way Distribution Center
2,228
694
2,922
3,315
(2,266
Gateway Corporate Center
6,736
24,747
6,744
36,394
43,138
(26,840
Hayward Commerce Center
1,933
10,955
3,961
14,916
16,849
(11,363
Hayward Commerce Park
7,131
10,519
763
11,282
18,413
(1,321
Hayward Distribution Center
5,510
3,554
1,038
8,857
9,895
(7,004
Hayward Industrial Center
13,535
48,573
13,659
62,232
75,767
(28,586
1993, 2015
Junction Industrial Park
7,658
39,106
48,920
(8,288
Laurelwood Drive
34,925
1,098
36,023
54,732
(4,197
Lawrence SSF
2,189
7,498
7,797
9,986
Livermore Distribution Center
8,992
26,976
3,841
30,817
(12,003
Martin-Scott Industrial Portfolio
9,717
498
13,761
(2,468
Oakland Industrial Center
8,234
24,704
2,650
8,235
27,353
35,588
(10,629
Overlook Distribution Center
1,573
8,915
2,576
11,491
(5,981
Pacific Business Center
6,075
26,260
4,153
30,413
36,488
(7,034
Pacific Commons Industrial Center
25,784
77,594
2,350
25,805
79,923
105,728
(30,853
Pacific Industrial Center
21,675
65,083
5,055
70,138
91,813
(27,280
San Francisco Industrial Park
35,017
15,007
15,088
50,105
(2,641
San Leandro Distribution Center
28,264
44,507
5,680
28,265
50,186
78,451
(11,452
Shoreline Business Center
4,328
16,101
7,029
23,130
27,458
(16,550
South Bay Brokaw
4,014
23,296
1,819
25,115
29,129
(5,145
South Bay Junction
3,662
21,120
1,891
23,011
26,673
(4,702
South Bay Lundy
6,500
33,642
2,691
36,333
42,833
(7,830
Spinnaker Business Center
7,043
25,220
38,340
45,383
(27,323
Thornton Business Center
2,047
11,706
4,822
2,066
16,509
18,575
(11,978
TriPoint Business Park
9,057
23,727
4,874
28,601
37,658
(5,468
Utah Airfreight
10,657
42,842
2,806
45,648
56,305
(9,147
Wiegman Road
12,531
1,255
13,786
16,071
(2,320
Yosemite Drive
31,304
65,674
65,969
97,273
(4,245
Zanker-Charcot Industrial Center
4,867
28,750
2,224
30,974
35,841
(6,192
420,449
1,081,182
208,018
421,351
1,288,298
1,709,649
(417,808
Savannah, Georgia
Morgan Business Center
2,161
14,680
1,260
15,940
18,101
(2,794
Seattle, Washington
Auburn Distribution Center
2,608
5,742
5,775
8,383
(233
East Valley Warehouse
10,472
57,825
58,837
69,309
(10,563
Fife Distribution Center
3,245
13,811
3,588
13,468
17,056
(1,295
Harvest Business Park
3,541
18,827
1,002
19,829
23,370
Interurban Distribution Center
7,233
13,958
14,036
21,269
(1,532
Kent Centre Corporate Park
21,599
1,170
22,769
28,166
(4,519
Kent Corporate Center
12,616
8,368
842
9,210
21,826
(539
Kent-Northwest Corporate Park
71,768
139,886
3,069
142,955
214,723
(9,422
Kingsport Industrial Park
16,605
48,942
3,139
16,800
51,886
68,686
(13,669
Northwest Distribution Center
24,090
26,084
31,198
(5,403
Occidental Distribution Center
1,770
1,960
471
(100
Portside Distribution Center
111,175
71,376
2,274
112,575
72,250
184,825
(3,896
2015, 2016
ProLogis Park SeaTac
12,230
14,170
3,752
12,457
17,695
30,152
(4,423
Puget Sound Airfreight
1,408
4,651
6,059
(943
Renton Northwest Corporate Park
5,102
17,946
1,304
19,250
24,352
(4,479
SEA Cargo Center North
10,279
10,342
(8,842
Sumner Landing
(e)
10,332
32,545
33,439
43,771
(5,359
Van Doren's Distribution Center
3,166
7,339
7,346
10,512
(590
283,782
499,053
35,365
285,947
532,253
818,200
(79,805
Airport West Distribution Center
3,825
4,116
1,974
7,220
9,194
(4,260
1995, 1998
Beacon Centre
37,998
196,004
15,561
211,565
249,563
(40,076
Beacon Industrial Park
23,511
75,424
4,812
80,236
103,747
(14,551
Beacon Lakes
32,911
24,691
39,333
32,658
64,277
96,935
(3,646
Blue Lagoon Business Park
9,189
29,451
31,880
41,069
(6,369
CenterPort Distribution Center
8,802
22,504
3,958
8,922
26,342
35,264
(10,623
1999, 2012
Commercial Logistics Center
7,938
11,083
632
11,715
19,653
Congress Distribution Center
2,266
5,639
381
6,020
8,286
(375
Dolphin Distribution Center
2,716
858
8,222
10,938
(2,263
Gateway Center
1,015
1,302
2,317
Hollywood Park Distribution Center
16,848
36,191
1,574
37,765
54,613
(2,597
International Corporate Park
26,915
54,436
3,849
58,285
85,200
(6,376
2010, 2015
Lyons Technology Park
1,988
3,651
3,683
5,671
(245
Magnolia Park Distribution Center
1,613
1,712
3,110
Marlin Distribution Center
1,844
6,603
8,896
(1,649
Miami Airport Business Center
11,173
45,921
2,917
48,838
60,011
(10,456
North Andrews Distribution Center
11,327
22,330
22,892
34,219
(3,963
Pompano Beach Distribution Center
11,035
15,136
3,879
19,015
30,050
Pompano Center of Commerce
5,171
13,930
14,510
19,681
(2,669
Port Lauderdale Distribution Center
40,927
73,128
11,407
42,235
83,227
125,462
(11,392
1997, 2012, 2014, 2015
Port Lucie West Distribution Center
1,412
1,468
ProLogis Park I-595
11,326
1,999
12,423
14,422
(5,889
2003
Prospect Park Distribution Center
4,859
11,041
11,246
16,105
(764
Sawgrass International Park
5,163
11,476
641
12,117
17,280
Seneca Distribution Center
16,357
46,738
327
47,065
63,422
(2,230
South Dade Commerce Center
1,791
147
169
(36
Sunshine Park Distribution Center
2,822
4,857
4,892
(365
Tarpon Distribution Center
6,451
6,788
8,635
(1,804
292,193
743,656
100,167
294,090
841,926
1,136,016
(138,494
Activity Distribution Center
10,820
27,410
27,831
38,651
(1,510
Anaheim Industrial Center
31,086
57,836
4,114
61,950
93,036
(23,552
Anaheim Industrial Property
5,096
10,816
10,887
15,983
(2,151
Arrow Industrial Park
4,840
8,120
1,112
9,232
14,072
(2,029
Artesia Industrial Center
163,764
217,400
41,082
178,700
243,546
422,246
(38,492
Bell Ranch Distribution Center
5,539
23,092
1,785
24,877
30,416
(5,635
Brea Industrial Center
2,488
4,062
4,529
7,017
(888
California Commerce Center
30,127
52,094
4,781
56,875
87,002
(7,914
Carson Distribution Center
29,974
22,483
17,531
29,975
40,013
69,988
(3,568
Carson Industrial Center
844
2,081
968
3,049
3,893
(747
Carson Town Center
11,781
31,572
1,287
32,859
44,640
(5,899
CAT - Kaiser Commerce Center
8,807
4,972
8,806
13,778
(328
Cedarpointe Industrial Park
56,349
105,792
1,518
107,310
163,659
(7,316
2012, 2015
Chartwell Distribution Center
55,803
77,135
81,814
137,617
(6,953
Chatsworth Distribution Center
11,713
17,569
17,690
29,403
(1,159
Chino Industrial Center
850
1,274
8,338
9,178
10,462
(1,161
Commerce Industrial Center
11,345
20,068
31,413
(3,274
Crossroads Business Park
36,131
98,030
114,144
89,673
158,632
248,305
(44,682
2005, 2010, 2014
Del Amo Industrial Center
7,471
17,889
18,275
25,746
(4,291
Dominguez North Industrial Center
20,662
34,382
4,723
20,688
39,079
59,767
(9,587
2007, 2012
Eaves Distribution Center
13,914
31,041
2,748
33,789
47,703
(8,308
Foothill Business Center
5,254
8,096
8,418
13,672
(1,437
Ford Distribution Center
44,128
108,125
3,837
111,962
156,090
(22,488
Fordyce Distribution Center
6,110
19,485
910
20,395
26,505
(5,266
Harris Business Center Alliance II
66,195
3,076
69,271
(14,258
Haven Distribution Center
73,903
8,385
82,288
179,263
(18,460
Huntington Beach Distribution Center
14,679
22,019
794
22,813
37,492
Industry Distribution Center
54,170
99,434
8,623
108,057
162,227
(40,067
2005, 2012
Inland Empire Distribution Center
43,320
84,006
44,100
91,636
135,736
(26,974
2005, 2012, 2015
Jack Northrup Distribution Center
4,280
9,820
9,873
14,153
(493
Kaiser Distribution Center
131,819
242,618
16,957
136,030
255,364
391,394
(92,994
2005, 2008
LAX Cargo Center
19,217
379
19,596
(7,520
Los Angeles Industrial Center
3,777
7,015
7,393
11,170
(2,965
Main St Distribution Center
13,058
20,370
853
21,223
34,281
(1,132
Meridian Park
38,270
70,022
71,066
109,336
(9,381
Mid Counties Industrial Center
55,436
96,453
16,685
55,437
113,137
168,574
(43,364
2005, 2006, 2010, 2012
Mill Street Distribution Center
1,825
4,306
6,130
(363
Mill Street Spec Distribution Center
15,691
36,550
36,738
52,429
(2,999
Milliken Distribution Center
18,831
30,811
31,043
49,874
(5,888
NDP - Los Angeles
41,115
3,529
44,644
59,499
(10,837
Normandie Industrial Center
12,297
14,957
1,989
16,946
29,243
(4,317
North County Distribution Center
75,581
101,342
10,236
111,578
187,159
(17,449
2011, 2012, 2015
Ontario Distribution Center
18,823
29,524
482
30,006
48,829
(5,341
Orange Industrial Center
19,296
9,514
706
4,157
25,359
29,516
(3,172
2005, 2016
20,810
32,169
3,170
35,339
56,149
(6,205
Pomona Distribution Center
22,361
27,898
28,103
50,464
(2,519
ProLogis Park Ontario
25,499
47,366
1,283
48,649
74,148
(15,843
Rancho Cucamonga Distribution Center
58,710
113,273
5,079
58,711
118,351
177,062
(34,842
Redlands Commerce Center
20,583
30,881
30,894
51,477
(2,552
Redlands Distribution Center
156,478
120,920
200,028
154,454
322,972
477,426
(32,938
2006, 2007, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
Redondo Beach Distribution Center
7,455
11,223
11,295
18,750
(934
Rialto Distribution Center
86,270
200,602
33,564
88,648
231,788
320,436
(30,989
Riverbluff Distribution Center
42,964
33,014
75,978
(8,401
2009
Santa Ana Distribution Center
27,070
32,168
33,421
60,491
(4,699
Santa Fe Distribution Center
12,163
9,927
10,011
22,174
(664
Slover Distribution Center
45,492
45,878
86,213
(2,319
South Bay Distribution Center
27,511
6,608
15,280
33,317
48,597
(12,633
2005, 2007
South Bay Transport
15,928
23,891
23,997
39,925
(630
Starboard Distribution Center
18,763
53,824
54,210
72,973
(10,725
Terra Francesco
11,196
15,673
26,869
(582
Torrance Distribution Center
25,730
40,414
1,134
41,548
67,278
(7,211
Transpark Inland Empire Distribution Center
28,936
578
42,745
71,681
(3,339
Van Nuys Airport Industrial Center
23,455
39,916
2,860
42,776
66,231
(8,225
Vernon Distribution Center
23,998
44,529
4,788
24,000
49,315
73,315
(19,476
Vernon Industrial Center
692
4,121
3,516
7,637
(2,993
Vista Distribution Center
4,150
6,225
3,933
10,158
14,308
Walnut Drive
2,665
7,397
218
7,615
10,280
(1,544
Watson Industrial Center AFdII
6,944
11,193
11,591
18,535
(2,345
Wilmington Avenue Warehouse
11,172
34,723
2,952
37,675
48,847
(7,616
Workman Mill Distribution Center
32,467
56,672
768
32,470
57,437
89,907
(2,505
1,961,383
3,136,328
628,810
2,029,727
3,696,794
5,726,521
(743,593
Tampa, Florida
Corporate Center Tampa
4,458
19,166
(429
18,737
23,195
(1,143
Subtotal United States:
1,699
5,620,515
13,772,631
3,182,003
5,710,671
16,864,478
22,575,149
(3,521,641
Canada:
Toronto
Airport Road Distribution Center
22,447
63,150
2,165
23,461
64,301
87,762
(10,661
Annagem Distribution Center
3,028
10,357
3,164
10,984
14,148
(1,870
Annagem Distribution Center II
4,368
1,238
1,782
5,529
7,311
(945
Bolton Distribution Center
6,861
21,418
7,171
21,108
28,279
(3,943
Keele Distribution Center
1,066
515
4,745
5,860
(1,214
Meadowvale Distribution Center
31,136
47,244
31,718
46,662
78,380
(2,118
Millcreek Distribution Center
7,427
28,251
7,762
28,766
36,528
(4,873
Milton 401 Business Park
5,794
18,982
3,080
6,055
21,801
27,856
(4,627
Milton 402 Business Park
11,960
32,582
8,882
12,262
41,162
53,424
(4,193
2011, 2014, 2016
Milton Crossings Business Park
16,922
41,190
4,588
17,686
45,014
62,700
(7,437
Mississauga Gateway Center
51,330
118,855
532
51,673
119,044
170,717
(9,989
2008, 2014, 2016
Pearson Logistics Center
10,796
38,698
11,283
39,737
51,020
(6,650
Tapscott Distribution Center
4,571
6,302
7,505
10,873
(241
175,043
360,712
99,103
178,500
456,358
634,858
(58,761
Subtotal Canada:
Parque Opcion
730
2,287
3,649
4,379
(802
Reynosa
El Puente Industrial Center
989
12,916
12,138
13,905
(314
Subtotal Mexico:
1,719
14,278
2,497
15,787
18,284
(1,116
Subtotal North American Markets:
1726
5,797,277
14,135,630
3,295,384
5,891,668
17,336,623
23,228,291
(3,581,518
European Markets
Austria
Himberg Distribution Center
3,225
5,473
3,551
5,147
8,698
(786
Prague Rudna Distribution Center
2,259
11,770
3,035
14,805
17,064
(825
Uzice Distribution Center
2,345
15,313
17,658
(4,130
18,348
30,118
34,722
(4,955
Bonneuil Distribution Center
11,840
Le Havre Distribution Center
8,059
(178
LGR Genevill. 1 SAS
2,107
718
2,825
4,767
(442
LGR Genevill. 2 SAS
1,493
3,095
4,632
(477
Moissy II Distribution Center
9,562
3,555
21,878
10,250
24,745
34,995
(2,425
2014, 2016
Port of Rouen
13,440
13,610
(2,791
13,617
22,197
42,089
14,305
63,598
77,903
(7,606
Hausbruch Industrial Center 4-B
7,201
4,684
4,906
12,107
(2,096
Hausbruch Industrial Center 5-650
2,592
3,284
(210
Kolleda Distribution Center
223
3,450
(276
3,174
3,397
(605
Lauenau Distribution Center
2,417
5,380
5,684
(1,120
Meerane Distribution Center
22,214
71,263
25,970
67,507
93,477
(983
34,647
71,805
38,403
81,963
120,366
(5,014
Hungary
Hegyeshalom Distribution Center
2,969
3,214
Arena Po Distribution Center
7,185
19,447
605
20,052
27,237
(5,360
Castel San Giovanni Distribution Center
2,986
9,117
12,424
(1,885
Siziano Logistics Park
9,538
17,290
1,198
18,488
28,026
(3,255
19,709
45,854
2,124
47,978
67,687
(10,500
Nadarzyn Distribution Center
2,180
6,905
9,085
(1,486
Piotrkow II Distribution Center
1,418
4,864
4,886
6,282
(1,170
Sochaczew Distribution Center
10,242
2,214
11,822
12,572
(2,874
Szczecin Distribution Center
925
13,163
928
13,160
14,088
(218
4,639
27,146
42,027
(5,748
Slovakia
Sered Distribution Center
2,105
11,559
13,664
(2,233
Baraja MAD Logistics Center
34,100
1,040
35,140
(7,935
Sweden
Orebro Distribution Center
8,738
19,104
2,230
21,334
30,072
(6,267
United Kingdom
Grange Park
13,258
14,900
14,331
13,827
28,158
(519
Midpoint Park
17,843
9,526
24,621
28,979
51,990
(2,253
31,101
39,521
37,342
42,806
80,148
(2,772
Subtotal European Markets:
122,630
166,707
224,304
134,011
379,630
513,641
(53,816
Asian Markets
Dalian Industrial Park Distribution Center
12,828
2,052
13,045
15,097
(2,043
Fengxian Logistics Center
12,149
991
13,140
(5,073
Jiaxing Distribution Center
10,104
9,795
15,058
8,555
26,402
34,957
(2,715
2011, 2013
Tianjin Bonded Logistics Park
1,380
8,367
1,257
8,515
9,772
ProLogis Park Narita III
13,723
43,139
16,104
11,864
61,102
72,966
(11,346
Airport Logistics Center 3
23,553
23,754
(5,890
Changi South Distribution Center 1
38,384
38,488
(8,773
Changi-North Distribution Center 1
14,276
14,416
(3,158
Singapore Airport Logistics Center 2
34,105
34,299
(8,547
Tuas Distribution Center
17,324
17,602
(6,431
127,642
917
128,559
(32,799
Subtotal Asian Markets:
170,781
17,021
189,661
201,525
(44,145
Total Industrial Operating Properties
5,933,630
14,473,118
3,536,709
23,943,457
(3,679,479
Development Portfolio
United States
9,868
28,881
38,749
International Park of Commerce
3,048
3,050
11,360
14,282
5,970
153
9,825
9,978
1,424
3,725
5,149
1,577
13,550
15,127
8,546
5,874
14,420
2,403
14,430
Greens Parkway Distribution Center
1,246
14,477
15,723
Ann Rd-N Sloan LN Distribution Center
3,609
19,749
23,358
Las Vegas Beltway Distribution Center
7,321
7,443
14,764
3,936
1,003
4,939
2,734
10,114
12,848
5,348
8,011
13,359
22,948
46,320
69,268
4,140
21,382
25,522
New Jersey
Elizabeth Seaport
15,732
3,145
Tri-Port Distribution Center
34,102
49,834
52,979
Riverside Distribution Center
1,075
274
1,349
Southport Distribution Center
1,599
20,594
22,193
11,287
14,693
25,980
Oakland Logistics Park
815
4,327
5,142
12,102
19,020
31,122
Park Tacoma Distribution Center
2,528
681
11,833
8,112
19,945
Agua Mansa
15,511
1,250
16,761
Meridan Park
6,951
23,972
18,136
5,474
23,610
50,668
13,675
64,343
186,337
221,777
408,114
7,792
20,390
28,182
7,875
15,631
23,506
15,667
36,021
51,688
Agua Fria Industrial Park
4,912
10,941
15,853
Arrayanes Industrial Park
4,738
11,482
Los Altos Industrial Park
3,726
5,712
San Jose Distribution Center
24,303
19,060
43,363
Toluca Distribution Center
4,485
7,659
40,853
46,942
87,795
242,857
304,740
547,597
Prague Airport Distribution Center
1,858
1,444
3,302
6,540
8,971
8,398
10,415
Isle d'Abeau Distribution Center
7,492
7,348
14,840
868
25,104
25,972
2,459
2,131
4,590
10,819
34,583
45,402
Bremen Distribution Center
1,275
5,198
6,473
Hamm Distribution Center 1
4,699
Krefeld Park
1,372
3,378
4,750
15,922
Budapest-Sziget Distribution Center
4,250
9,381
13,631
Bologna Distribution Center
2,291
Nieuwegein Distribution Center
6,551
7,766
Venlo Distribution Center
13,125
13,297
26,422
19,676
21,063
40,739
Chorzow Distribution Center
3,684
7,096
10,780
2,252
9,880
12,132
Strykow
6,789
11,435
329
2,666
2,995
10,911
26,431
Galanta Distribution Center
5,296
2,569
7,865
ProLogis Park Nove Mesto
2,473
5,941
8,414
7,769
8,510
16,279
Massalaves Distribution Center
4,809
5,112
San Fernando Distribution Center
6,350
6,378
11,159
11,490
Gothenburg Distribution Center
13,142
14,638
27,780
Birmingham International Gateway Distribution Center
13,835
9,616
23,451
Daventry Phase II Distribution Center
5,524
6,126
Dirft Distribution Center
4,068
Marston Gate Distribution Center
13,735
9,714
23,449
North Kettering Business Park
2,367
2,399
Stockly Park Distribution Center
24,153
16,910
41,063
63,559
36,997
100,556
159,320
171,886
331,206
Chiba New Town Distribution Center
31,406
124,053
155,459
Higashi Matsuyama Distribution Center
13,402
7,841
21,243
Ibaraki Distribution Center
43,515
178,641
222,156
Koga Distribution Center
8,257
12,090
20,347
Narashino IV Distribution Center
19,424
66,114
85,538
Shiohama Distribution Center
35,058
13,478
48,536
151,062
402,217
553,279
Total Development Portfolio
553,239
878,843
1,432,082
GRAND TOTAL
1,865
6,486,869
4,415,552
6,590,782
18,784,757
25,375,539
Schedule III – Footnotes
(a)
The following table reconciles real estate assets per Schedule III to the Consolidated Balance Sheet in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data at December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Total per Schedule III
Other real estate investments
Total per consolidated balance sheet
(f)
(b)
The aggregate cost for federal tax purposes at December 31, 2016, of our real estate assets was approximately $16.1 billion (unaudited).
Real estate assets (excluding land balances) are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. These useful lives are generally 5 to 7 years for capital improvements, 10 years for standard tenant improvements, 25 years for depreciable land improvements, 30 years for operating properties acquired and 40 years for operating properties we develop.
The following table reconciles accumulated depreciation per Schedule III to the Consolidated Balance Sheet in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data at December 31, 2016 (in thousands):
Total accumulated depreciation per Schedule III
3,679,479
Accumulated depreciation on other real estate investments
78,893
Properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $5.2 billion secure $2.7 billion of mortgage notes. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for more information related to our secured mortgage debt.
Assessment bonds of $14.5 million are secured by assessments (similar to property taxes) on various underlying real estate properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $737.4 million. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for more information related to our assessment bonds.
The following table summarizes our real estate assets and accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Real estate assets:
Balance at beginning of year
25,608,648
20,109,432
18,822,081
Acquisitions of operating properties, improvements to operating properties
development activity, transfers of land to CIP and net effect of changes
in foreign exchange rates and other
1,883,888
7,191,335
3,595,836
Basis of operating properties disposed of
(1,359,186
(1,719,632
(2,713,300
Change in the development portfolio balance, including the acquisition
of properties
(440,821
398,923
452,963
Assets transferred to held-for-sale
(316,990
(371,410
(48,148
Balance at end year
Accumulated depreciation:
3,207,855
2,748,835
2,540,267
Depreciation expense
668,686
617,258
490,298
Balances retired upon disposition of operating properties and net effect
of changes in foreign exchange rates and other
(195,895
(153,621
(277,516
(1,167
(4,617
(4,214
Balance at end of year
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
By:
/s/ HAMID R. MOGHADAM
Hamid R. Moghadam
Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 14, 2017
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned officers and directors of Prologis, Inc., hereby severally constitute Hamid R. Moghadam, Thomas S. Olinger and Edward S. Nekritz, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Form 10-K filed herewith and any and all amendments to said Form 10-K, and generally to do all such things in our names and in our capacities as officers and directors to enable Prologis, Inc. to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ THOMAS S. OLINGER
Chief Financial Officer
Thomas S. Olinger
/s/ LORI A. PALAZZOLO
Managing Director and Chief Accounting Officer
Lori A. Palazzolo
/s/ GEORGE L. FOTIADES
Director
George L. Fotiades
/s/ CHRISTINE N. GARVEY
Christine N. Garvey
/s/ LYDIA H. KENNARD
Lydia H. Kennard
/s/ J. MICHAEL LOSH
J. Michael Losh
/s/ IRVING F. LYONS III
Irving F. Lyons III
/s/ DAVID P. O’CONNOR
David P. O’Connor
/s/ JEFFREY L. SKELTON
Jeffrey L. Skelton
/s/ CARL B. WEBB
Carl B. Webb
/s/ WILLIAM D. ZOLLARS
William D. Zollars
Prologis, Inc., its general partner
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned officers and directors of Prologis, L.P., hereby severally constitute Hamid R. Moghadam, Thomas S. Olinger and Edward S. Nekritz, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Form 10-K filed herewith and any and all amendments to said Form 10-K, and generally to do all such things in our names and in our capacities as officers and directors to enable Prologis, L.P. to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto.
Certain of the following documents are filed herewith. Certain other of the following documents that have been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and, pursuant to Rule 12b-32, are incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Distribution Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2015, among Prologis, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 5, 2015).
Articles of Incorporation of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-35915) filed September 18, 1997).
Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the Series Q Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed June 2, 2011).
Articles of Merger of New Pumpkin Inc., a Maryland corporation, with and into Prologis, Inc., a Maryland corporation, changing the name of “AMB Property Corporation” to “Prologis, Inc.”, as filed with the Stated Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on June 2, 2011, and effective June 3, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
3.4
Articles of Amendment (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2012).
Thirteenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
3.6
First Amendment to Thirteenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Prologis, L.P., dated February 27, 2014, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 27, 2014).
3.7
Second Amendment to the Thirteenth Amended and Restated Agreement of the Limited Partnership of Prologis, L.P., dated October 7, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 13, 2015).
3.8
Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
3.9
Articles Supplementary dated April 3, 2014, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2014).
3.10
Eighth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Prologis, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2016).
Form of Certificate for Common Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (No. 333-172741) filed April 12, 2011).
Form of Certificate for the Series Q Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (No. 333-172741) filed April 28, 2011).
4.3
Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2011, by and among the Operating Partnership, as issuer, Prologis, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-177112) filed September 30, 2011).
4.4
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 15, 2013, among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.5
Form of Sixth Supplemental Indenture among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., Elavon Financial Services Limited, UK Branch, Elavon Financial Services Limited and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 2, 2013).
4.6
Form of Seventh Supplemental Indenture among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., Elavon Financial Services Limited, UK Branch, Elavon Financial Services Limited and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2014).
4.7
Indenture, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006).
4.8
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163) filed April 2, 1998).
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163) filed April 2, 1998).
4.10
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163) filed April 2, 1998).
4.11
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 10, 2006, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006).
4.12
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2009, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 20, 2009).
4.13
Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2009, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 20, 2009).
4.14
Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2010, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 9, 2010).
4.15
Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 12, 2010, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2010).
4.16
4.00% Notes due 2018 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2010).
4.17
Form of 2.750% Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.18
Form of 4.250% Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.19
3.350% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 1, 2013).
4.20
Form of 3.000% Notes due 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 2, 2013).
4.21
Form of 3.375% Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2014).
4.22
Form of 3.00% Notes due 2026 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2014).
4.23
Form of 1.375% Notes due 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 6, 2014).
4.24
Officers’ Certificate related to the 2.750% Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.25
Officers’ Certificate related to the 4.250% Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.26
Officers’ Certificate related to the 3.350% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 1, 2013).
Form of Officers’ Certificate related to the 3.375% Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2014).
4.28
Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the 3.00% Notes due 2026 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2014).
4.29
Form of Officer’s Certificate related to 1.375% Notes due 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-k filed on October 6, 2014).
4.30
Form of Officers’ Certificate related to the 1.375% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2015).
4.31
Form of 1.375% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2015).
4.32
Form of Officers’ Certificate related to the 3.750% Notes due 2025 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2015).
4.33
Form of 3.750% Notes due 2025 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 30, 2015).
Other debt instruments are omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Registration S-K. Copies of such instruments will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
10.1
Agreement of Limited Partnership of ProLogis Limited Partnership-I, dated as of December 22, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Trust’s Registration Statement (No. 33-73382)) .
10.2
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of ProLogis Fraser, L.P., dated as of August 4, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).
10.3
Fifteenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Prologis 2, L.P., (f/k/a AMB Property II, L.P.) dated February 19, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
10.4*
The Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).
10.5*
Amendment No. 1 to the Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).
10.6*
Amendment No. 2 to the Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Operating Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004).
10.7*
Amended and Restated 2002 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 4, 2006 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 4, 2006).
10.8*
The Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 15, 2007 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 15, 2007).
10.9*
Prologis Outperformance Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2011).
10.10*
Prologis, Inc. 2016 Outperformance Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2016).
10.11*
Form of Prologis, Inc. 2016 Outperformance Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2016).
10.12*
Form of Participation Points and LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 27, 2014).
10.13*
Second Amended and Restated Prologis Promote Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2014).
10.14*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Prologis Promote Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2014).
10.15*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (General) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).
10.16*
Form of Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (LTIP Unit election) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).
10.17*
Form of Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).
10.18*
Form of Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Bonus exchange) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).
10.19*
ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 2, 2006).
10.20*
First Amendment of the ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010).
10.21*
Second Amendment of the ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 19, 2010).
10.22*
Third Amendment of the ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010).
10.23*
Form of Non Qualified Share Option Award Terms; The Trust 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
10.24*
Form of Restricted Share Award Terms; ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
10.25*
Form of Performance Share Award Terms; ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
10.26*
ProLogis 2000 Share Option Plan for Outside Trustees (as Amended and Restated Effective as of December 31, 2009) (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.13 to ProLogis’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).
10.27*
ProLogis Trust 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated Effective as of September 26, 2002) (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to ProLogis’ Form 8-K dated February 19, 2003).
10.28*
First Amendment of ProLogis 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to ProLogis’ Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2010).
10.29*
ProLogis Deferred Fee Plan for Trustees (As Amended and Restated Effective as of May 14, 2010) (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to ProLogis’ Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2010).
10.30*
Form of Indemnification Agreement between ProLogis and certain directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
10.31*
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement; Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012).
10.32*
Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2012).
10.33*
Form of Director Deferred Stock Unit Award terms (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2012).
10.34*
Form of Change of Control and Noncompetition Agreement by and between Prologis, Inc. and its executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 16, 2013).
10.35*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (General form 2015) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.36*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (Bonus exchange) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015).
10.37*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (General form 2016) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.48 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).
10.38*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Outperformance Plan LTIP Unit Exchange Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.58 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.39*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Equity Exchange Offer LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.40*
Amended and Restated Prologis, Inc. 2011 Notional Account Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.60 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.41*
Amended and Restated Prologis, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.42*
Second Amended and Restated Prologis 2005 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.62 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.43
Time-Sharing Agreement, dated January 21, 2015, by and between ProLogis Logistics Services Incorporated and Hamid R. Moghadam (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.63 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.44
Amended and Restated Time-Sharing Agreement, dated January 11, 2016, by and between ProLogis Logistics Services Incorporated and Hamid R. Moghadam (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).
10.45
Global Senior Credit Agreement dated as of July 11, 2013, among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., various affiliates of Prologis, L.P., various lenders and agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 15, 2013).
10.46
First Amendment to the Global Senior Credit Agreement dated as of June 26, 2014 among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., various affiliates of Prologis, L.P., various lenders and Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2014).
10.47
Second Amendment to the Global Senior Credit Agreement dated as of January 22, 2015 among Prologis, L.P., various affiliates of Prologis, L.P., various lenders and Bank of America, N.A. as global administrative agent. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2015).
10.48
Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of August 14, 2013 among Prologis Japan Finance Y.K., as initial borrower, Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P., as guarantors, the banks listed on the signature pages thereof, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 16, 2013).
10.49
Guaranty of Payment, dated as of August 14, 2013, among Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P., as guarantors, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Administrative Agent, for the banks that are from time to time parties to the Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated at August 14, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 16, 2013).
10.50
Senior Term Loan Agreement dated as of June 19, 2014 among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., various affiliates of Prologis, L.P., various lenders and Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2014).
10.51
Senior Term Loan Agreement dated as of May 28, 2015 among Prologis, L.P., as Borrower, Prologis, Inc., as Guarantor, various lenders and Bank of America N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 1, 2015).
10.52
First Amendment, dated January 22, 2015, to the Senior Term Loan Agreement dated as of June 19, 2014, among Prologis, L.P., various affiliates thereof, various lenders and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.63 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).
10.53
Term Loan Agreement dated as of August 18, 2016 among Prologis GK Holdings Y.K., as borrower, Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P., as guarantors, the banks listed on the signature pages thereof, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 22, 2016).
10.54
Guaranty of Payment dated as of August 18, 2016 among Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P., as guarantors, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Administrative Agent, for the banks that are from time to time parties to the Term Loan Agreement dated as of August 18, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 22, 2016).
10.55
Amended and Restated Global Senior Credit Agreement dated as of April 14, 2016 among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., various affiliates of Prologis, L.P., various lenders and agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 18, 2016).
10.56
Letter Agreement dated February 3, 2017 by and between Prologis, Inc. and Hamid R. Moghadam (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2017).
12.1†
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P.
12.2†
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock/Unit Dividends of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P.
21.1†
Subsidiaries of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P.
23.1†
Consent of KPMG LLP with respect to Prologis, Inc.
23.2†
Consent of KPMG LLP with respect to Prologis, L.P.
24.1†
Power of Attorney for Prologis, Inc. (included in signature page of this annual report).
24.2†
Power of Attorney for Prologis, L.P. (included in signature page of this annual report).
31.1†
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Prologis, Inc.
31.2†
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Prologis, Inc.
31.3†
Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Prologis, L.P.
31.4†
Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Prologis, L.P.
32.1†
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Prologis, Inc., pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2†
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Prologis, L.P., pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1
Supplemental United States Federal Income Tax Considerations (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 20, 2016).
101. INS†
XBRL Instance Document
101. SCH†
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101. CAL†
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101. DEF†
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101. LAB†
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101. PRE†
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
*
Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement
†
Filed herewith