UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
R
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
or
£
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-13545 (Prologis, Inc.) 001-14245 (Prologis, L.P.)
Prologis, Inc.
Prologis, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland (Prologis, Inc.)
Delaware (Prologis, L.P.)
94-3281941 (Prologis, Inc.)
94-3285362 (Prologis, L.P.)
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California
94111
(Address or principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(415) 394-9000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
New York Stock Exchange
4.000% Notes due 2018
1.375% Notes due 2020
1.375% Notes due 2021
3.000% Notes due 2022
3.375% Notes due 2024
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Prologis, Inc. – NONE
Prologis, L.P. – NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Prologis, Inc.: Yes þ No o
Prologis, L.P.: Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Prologis, Inc.: Yes o No þ
Prologis, L.P.: Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Prologis, Inc.: Yes þ No o Prologis, L.P.: Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website; if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Prologis, Inc.: Yes þ No o Prologis, L.P.: Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
Prologis, Inc.:
þ Large accelerated filer
o Accelerated filer
o Non-accelerated filer (do not check if a smaller reporting company)
o Smaller reporting company
Prologis, L.P.:
o Large accelerated filer
þ Non-accelerated filer (do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Based on the closing price of Prologis, Inc.’s common stock on June 30, 2015, the aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by nonaffiliates of Prologis, Inc. was $19,266,497,534.
The number of shares of Prologis, Inc.’s common stock outstanding at February 12, 2016, was approximately 524,774,000.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of Part III of this report are incorporated by reference to the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2016 annual meeting of its stockholders or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This report combines the annual reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P. Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, references to “Prologis, Inc.” or the “Parent” mean Prologis, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries; and references to “Prologis, L.P.” or the “Operating Partnership” mean Prologis, L.P., and its consolidated subsidiaries. The terms “the Company,” “Prologis,” “we,” “our” or “us” means Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership collectively.
Prologis, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (a “REIT”) and the general partner of the Operating Partnership. At December 31, 2015, Prologis, Inc. owned an approximate 97.12% common general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership and 100% of the preferred units in the Operating Partnership. The remaining approximate 2.88% common limited partnership interests are owned by nonaffiliated investors and certain current and former directors and officers of Prologis, Inc. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, Prologis, Inc. has complete responsibility and discretion in the day-to-day management and control of the Operating Partnership.
We operate Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management of Prologis, Inc. consists of the same members as the management of the Operating Partnership. These members are officers of Prologis, Inc. and employees of the Operating Partnership or one of its subsidiaries. As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, Prologis, Inc. consolidates the Operating Partnership for financial reporting purposes. Because the only significant asset of Prologis, Inc. is its investment in the Operating Partnership, the assets and liabilities of Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements.
We believe combining the annual reports on Form 10-K of Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership into this single report results in the following benefits:
·
enhances investors’ understanding of Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership by enabling investors to view the business as a whole in the same manner as management views and operates the business;
eliminates duplicative disclosure and provides a more streamlined and readable presentation as a substantial portion of the Company’s disclosure applies to both Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership; and
creates time and cost efficiencies through the preparation of one combined report instead of two separate reports.
It is important to understand the few differences between Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership in the context of how we operate the Company. Prologis, Inc. does not conduct business itself, other than acting as the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and issuing public equity from time to time. Prologis, Inc. itself does not incur any indebtedness, but it guarantees the unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership holds substantially all the assets of the business, directly or indirectly, and holds the ownership interests in the Company’s investment in certain entities. The Operating Partnership conducts the operations of the business and is structured as a partnership with no publicly traded equity. Except for net proceeds from equity issuances by Prologis, Inc., which are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for partnership units, the Operating Partnership generates capital required by the business through the Operating Partnership’s operations, incurrence of indebtedness and issuance of partnership units to third parties.
Noncontrolling interests, stockholders’ equity and partners’ capital are the main areas of difference between the consolidated financial statements of Prologis, Inc. and those of the Operating Partnership. The noncontrolling interests in the Operating Partnership’s consolidated financial statements include the interests in consolidated entities not owned by the Operating Partnership. The noncontrolling interests in Prologis, Inc.’s consolidated financial statements include the same noncontrolling interests at the Operating Partnership level, as well as the common limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership, not owned by Prologis, Inc., which are accounted for as partners’ capital by the Operating Partnership.
To highlight the differences between Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership, separate sections in this report, as applicable, individually discuss Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership, including separate financial statements and separate Exhibit 31 and 32 certifications. In the sections that combine disclosure of Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership, this report refers to actions or holdings as being actions or holdings of Prologis.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item
Description
Page
PART I
1.
Business
3
The Company
Investment Strategy
4
Business Strategy and Operating Segments
Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
6
Environmental Matters
Insurance Coverage
1A.
Risk Factors
1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
12
2.
Properties
Geographic Distribution
Lease Expirations
15
Co-Investment Ventures
16
3.
Legal Proceedings
4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information and Holders
Preferred Stock Dividends
17
Sale of Unregistered Securities
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Other Stockholder Matters
6.
Selected Financial Data
18
7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management’s Overview
Results of Operations
19
26
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
30
Contractual Obligations
Critical Accounting Policies
New Accounting Pronouncements
32
Funds from Operations attributable to common stockholders and unitholders (“FFO”)
7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
34
8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
35
9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
9A.
Controls and Procedures
9B.
Other Information
36
PART III
10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
11.
Executive Compensation
12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
15.
Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules
2
The statements in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which we operate as well as management’s beliefs and assumptions. Such statements involve uncertainties that could significantly impact our financial results. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” and “estimates” including variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future — including statements relating to rent and occupancy growth, development activity and changes in sales or contribution volume of properties, disposition activity, general conditions in the geographic areas where we operate, our debt, capital structure and financial position, our ability to form new co-investment ventures and the availability of capital in existing or new co-investment ventures — are forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained, and therefore actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that may affect outcomes and results include, but are not limited to: (i) national, international, regional and local economic climates, (ii) changes in financial markets, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, (iii) increased or unanticipated competition for our properties, (iv) risks associated with acquisitions, dispositions and development of properties, (v) maintenance of REIT status, tax structuring and income tax rates, (vi) availability of financing and capital, the levels of debt that we maintain and our credit ratings, (vii) risks related to our investments in our co-investment ventures, including our ability to establish new co-investment ventures, (viii) risks of doing business internationally, including currency risks, (ix) environmental uncertainties, including risks of natural disasters, and (x) those additional factors discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors in this report. We undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statements appearing in this report except as may be required by law.
ITEM 1. Business
We are the global leader in logistics real estate, focused on high-barrier, high-growth markets across the Americas, Europe and Asia. At December 31, 2015, we owned or had investments in, on a wholly owned basis or through co-investment ventures, properties and development projects expected to total approximately 669 million square feet (62 million square meters) in 20 countries. We lease modern distribution facilities to a diverse base of more than 5,200 customers across two major categories: business-to-business and retail/online fulfillment. For business-to-business enterprises, our buildings serve a variety of sectors, including automotive, transportation, pharmaceuticals and general consumer goods. In the area of retail/online fulfillment, our state-of-the-art logistics facilities foster the seamless flow of goods around the world.
Details of the 669 million square feet at December 31, 2015 was as follows (dollars and square feet in millions):
Americas
(4 countries)
Europe
(13 countries)
Asia
(3 countries)
Total
Operating portfolio (number of buildings)
2,403
714
86
3,203
Operating portfolio (square feet)
407
165
607
Development portfolio (square feet)
21
9
47
Other real estate properties (square feet)
10
1
438
178
53
669
Operating portfolio (gross book value)
$
29,586
12,243
4,328
46,157
Development portfolio (TEI) (1)
1,557
727
1,531
3,815
Land portfolio (book value)
922
445
199
1,566
32,065
13,415
6,058
51,538
(1)
Total expected investment (“TEI”) represents total estimated cost of development or expansion, including land, development and leasing costs. TEI is based on current projections and is subject to change. Non-U.S. dollar investments are translated to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at period end or the date of development start for purposes of calculating development starts in any period.
Our operating portfolio includes stabilized industrial properties in our owned and managed portfolio. A developed property moves into the operating portfolio when it meets stabilization. The property is considered stabilized when a development project has been completed for one year or is at least 90% occupied whichever occurs first. Our other real estate properties include properties in which we have an ownership interest but do not manage, and other properties we own, such as value-added
properties and assets held for sale to third parties. Value-added properties are those which are expected to be repurposed or redeveloped to a higher and better use. They also include newly acquired properties that present opportunities to create greater value.
Prologis, Inc. began operating as a fully integrated real estate company in 1997 and elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Internal Revenue Code”). We believe the current organization and method of operation will enable Prologis, Inc. to maintain its status as a REIT. The Operating Partnership also was formed in 1997.
Our global corporate headquarters are at Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111, and our other principal offices are in Amsterdam, Denver, Luxembourg, Mexico City, Sao Paulo, Shanghai, Singapore and Tokyo.
Our Internet address is www.prologis.com. All reports required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) are available and can be accessed free of charge through the Investor Relations section of our website after we electronically submit material to the SEC. The common stock of Prologis, Inc. is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker “PLD” and is a component of the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500.
Our investment strategy focuses on providing high-quality distribution facilities to customers whose businesses are tied to consumption and global trade and as such depend on the efficient movement of goods through the supply chain. We have a significant worldwide presence of $51.5 billion of real estate assets in our owned and managed portfolio which spans 20 countries on four continents. We focus our investments in large population centers with high per-capita consumption rates located near major airports, seaports and rail and highway systems. We classify our properties into two main market categories: global and regional. Global markets comprise approximately 30 of the largest markets tied to global trade and consumption. Regional markets benefit from large population centers but typically are not as tied to the global supply chain; instead, they serve local consumption and are less supply constrained.
We intend to hold primarily Class-A product in global and regional markets. At December 31, 2015, global and regional markets represented approximately 89% and 11%, respectively, of our owned and managed portfolio (based on our share, as determined by our ownership percentage for consolidated and unconsolidated entities, of the properties’ gross book value).
We have deep knowledge of our local markets, extensive construction expertise and a demonstrated commitment to sustainable design across our portfolio. We are supported by a diverse customer base and our relationships with multinational corporations bring us repeat business across our global portfolio. See below for information on our customers. For more detail on our properties, see Item 2. Properties.
Both macroeconomics and demographics are important drivers of our business; these drivers include population growth, consumption and rising affluence. In the developed markets of the United States (or “U.S.”), Europe and Japan, the reconfiguration of supply chains, which is strongly influenced by e-commerce trends, as well as the operational efficiencies that can be realized from our modern logistics facilities, are key factors. In emerging markets, such as Brazil, China and Mexico, new affluence and the rise of the consumer classes together have prompted demand as supply chains are constructed. Taken together, logistics real estate markets benefit from economic growth, as well as from the modernization of supply chains around the world.
In addition to our wholly owned investments we also have investments in a variety of ventures. We co-invest with partners and investors in entities that own multiple properties. We refer to these entities as co-investment ventures (consolidated or unconsolidated).
Our business comprises two operating segments: Real Estate Operations and Strategic Capital.
Real Estate Operations
Rental Operations. Rental operations is the largest segment and contributed approximately 90% of our revenues, earnings and funds from operations in 2015 (see below for our definition of funds from operations and a complete reconciliation to net earnings in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations). We collect rent from our customers through operating leases, including reimbursements for the majority of our property operating costs. We expect to generate long-term internal growth by maintaining high occupancy rates, controlling expenses and increasing rents. Our rental revenue is diversified by customer segment and geography. We believe our property management, leasing and maintenance teams, together with our capital expenditure, energy and risk management programs, create cost efficiencies that allow us to capitalize on the economies of scale inherent in owning, operating and growing a global portfolio.
Capital Deployment. Capital deployment includes the development, redevelopment and acquisition of industrial properties to increase rental income and therefore is reported with rental operations. We primarily deploy capital in global and regional markets to serve our customers’ requirements. We capitalize on the following: (i) our land bank, (ii) the development expertise of our local teams, (iii) our customer relationships, and (iv) the demand for high-quality distribution facilities. We aim to increase our rental revenue and our net asset value by leasing newly developed space and acquiring operating properties. We develop properties for long-term hold, for contribution to our co-investment ventures and, occasionally, for sale to third parties. In 2015, we stabilized $1.6 billion of development projects with an estimated gross margin of 32%, creating $515 million in value for Prologis.
Strategic Capital
Real estate is a capital intensive business that requires growth capital. We manage third-party capital on behalf of the world’s largest institutional partners in order to grow our business, provide incremental revenues, and align our assets and liabilities in local currencies thereby mitigating foreign currency risk associated with our international investments. We tailor logistics portfolios to meet our partners’ specific needs, with a focus on long-term ventures and open-ended funds. We also access alternative sources of equity through the publicly traded vehicles Nippon Prologis REIT, Inc. (“NPR”) and FIBRA Prologis. We hold a significant ownership interest in these ventures, aligning our interests with those of our partners. We generate strategic capital revenues from our unconsolidated ventures through asset management and property management services and we earn additional revenues by providing leasing, acquisition, construction, development, financing and disposition services. At December 31, 2015, we managed 276.5 million square feet of operating properties in nine unconsolidated co-investment ventures. For more detail of our co-investment ventures, see Item 2. Properties. Depending on the structure of the venture and the returns provided to our partners, we also earn revenues through incentive fees during the life of a venture or upon liquidation (called “promotes”). In 2015, this segment contributed approximately 10% of our revenues, earnings and our funds from operations. We plan to grow this business generally through our existing ventures.
Competition
Competitively priced distribution space could impact our occupancy rates and have an adverse effect on how much rent we can charge, which in turn could affect both of our operating segments. We may face competition with regard to our capital deployment activities, including local, regional and national operators or developers. We also face competition from investment managers for institutional capital within our strategic capital business.
We believe we have competitive advantages due to our:
ability to respond quickly to customers’ needs for high-quality distribution space in key global and regional markets;
established relationships with key customers served by our local teams;
ability to leverage our organizational scale and structure to provide a single point of contact for global customers through the Prologis global customer solutions team;
property management and leasing expertise;
relationships and proven track record with current and prospective investors in our strategic capital business;
global experience developing and managing industrial properties;
well-positioned land bank; and
team members with experience in the land entitlement and development processes.
Customers
Our broad customer base represents a spectrum of international, national, regional and local distribution users. At December 31, 2015, in Real Estate Operations, we had more than 4,600 customers occupying 338.3 million square feet of distribution space. On an owned and managed basis, we had more than 5,200 customers occupying 614.7 million square feet of distribution space.
In Strategic Capital, we view our partners and investors as our customers. At December 31, 2015, in our private ventures, we partnered with approximately 100 investors, several of which invest in multiple ventures.
The following table details our top 25 customers at December 31, 2015 (square feet in thousands):
Consolidated – Real Estate Operations
Owned and Managed
Top Customers
% of NER (1)
Total Occupied Square Feet
1. Amazon.com
4.5
11,626
2.8
13,001
2. Home Depot
1.8
5,431
2. DHL
1.6
10,401
3. FedEx Corporation
1.5
2,686
3. Geodis
1.2
7,914
4. XPO Logistics
1.0
4,099
1.1
8,282
5. United States Government
645
5. Kuehne + Nagel
6,195
6. Wal-Mart Stores
0.8
2,886
6. CEVA Logistics
6,735
7. Ingram Micro
2,524
7. Home Depot
5,441
8. PepsiCo
0.7
2,618
8. FedEx Corporation
0.9
3,105
9. DHL
2,200
9. Nippon Express Group
0.6
2,665
10. Cal Cartage Company
1,325
10. Wal-Mart Stores
4,915
Top 10 Customers
13.4
36,040
12.0
68,654
11. Best Buy
1,562
11. United States Government
1,243
12. Kimberly-Clark
0.5
2,091
12. Tesco
3,172
13. Sears
2,273
13. DB Schenker
3,786
14. Anixter
1,629
14. UPS
3,191
15. Geodis
2,004
15. Ingram Micro
3,181
16. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW)
1,503
16. Hitachi
1,907
17. UPS
1,606
17. Panalpina
2,237
18. APL
2,047
18. LG
0.4
2,567
19. Office Depot
1,592
19. PepsiCo
20. Kuehne + Nagel
1,508
20. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW)
1,991
21. Mohawk Industries
1,204
21. Samsung Electronics
0.3
2,103
22. Georgia-Pacific
1,292
22. La Poste
1,673
23. Kellogg's
1,750
23. Best Buy
1,827
24. C&S Wholesale Grocers
1,285
24. UTi
2,116
25. LG
1,333
25. Rhenus AG & CO KG
2,122
Top 25 Customers
20.3
60,719
18.5
104,388
Net effective rent (or “NER”) is calculated using the estimated total cash to be received over the term of the lease (including base rent and expense reimbursements) divided by the lease term to determine the amount of rent and expense reimbursements received per year. Amounts derived in a currency other than the U.S. dollar have been translated using the average rate from the previous twelve months.
5
Employees
The following table summarizes our global employee base at December 31, 2015:
Number of Employees
Region
Corporate and Support
625
300
955
220
20
130
370
155
45
230
1,000
80
475
1,555
We believe we have good relationships with our employees. Prologis employees are not organized under collective bargaining agreements, although some employees in Europe are represented by statutory Works Councils and as such they benefit from applicable labor agreements.
We maintain a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to our board of directors (the “Board”) and all of our officers and employees, including the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer and the principal accounting officer, or other people performing similar functions. A copy of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our website, www.prologis.com. In addition to being accessible through our website, copies of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct can be obtained, free of charge, upon written request to Investor Relations, Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111. Any amendments to or waivers of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that apply to the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer, or the principal accounting officer, or other people performing similar functions, and that relate to any matter enumerated in Item 406(b) of Regulation S-K, will be disclosed on our website.
We are exposed to various environmental risks that may result in unanticipated losses and affect our operating results and financial condition. Either the previous owners or we have conducted environmental reviews on a majority of the properties we have acquired, including land. While some of these assessments have led to further investigation and sampling, none of the environmental assessments has revealed an environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. See Item 1A. Risk Factors and Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
We carry insurance coverage on our properties. We determine the type of coverage and the policy specifications and limits based on what we deem to be the risks associated with our ownership of properties and our business operations in specific markets. Such coverage typically includes property damage and rental loss insurance resulting from such perils as fire, windstorm, flood, earthquake and terrorism; commercial general liability insurance; and environmental insurance. Insurance is maintained through a combination of commercial insurance, self-insurance and a wholly-owned captive insurance entity. The costs to insure our properties are primarily covered through reimbursements from our customers. We believe that our insurance coverage contains policy specifications and insured limits that are customary for similar properties, business activities and markets and we believe our properties are adequately insured. See further discussion in Item 1A. Risk Factors.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
Our operations and structure involve various risks that could adversely affect our business and financial condition, including but not limited to, our financial position, results of operations, cash flow, ability to make distributions and payments to security holders and the market value of our securities. These risks relate to our consolidated company as well as our investments in unconsolidated entities and include among others, (i) general risks; (ii) risks related to our business; (iii) risks related to financing and capital and (iv) income tax risks.
General Risks
As a global company, we are subject to social, political and economic risks of doing business in many countries.
We conduct a significant portion of our business and employ a substantial number of people outside of the U.S. During 2015, we generated approximately $335.3 million or 15.3% of our revenue from operations outside the U.S. Circumstances and developments related to international operations that could negatively affect us include, but are not limited to, the following factors:
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing international operations in certain regions, including differing employment practices and labor issues;
local businesses and cultural factors that differ from our usual standards and practices;
volatility in currencies and currency restrictions, which may prevent the transfer of capital and profits to the U.S.;
challenges in establishing effective controls and procedures to regulate operations in different regions and to monitor compliance with applicable regulations, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom Bribery Act and other similar laws;
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, tax and other laws;
potentially adverse tax consequences;
the responsibility of complying with multiple and potentially conflicting laws, e.g., with respect to corrupt practices, employment and licensing;
the impact of regional or country-specific business cycles and economic instability;
political instability, uncertainty over property rights, civil unrest, drug trafficking, political activism or the continuation or escalation of terrorist or gang activities;
foreign ownership restrictions in operations with the respective countries; and
access to capital may be more restricted, or unavailable on favorable terms or at all in certain locations.
In addition, we may be impacted by the ability of our non-U.S. subsidiaries to dividend or otherwise transfer cash among our subsidiaries, including transfers of cash to pay interest and principal on our debt, due to currency exchange control regulations, transfer pricing regulations and potentially adverse tax consequences, among other factors.
Disruptions in the global capital and credit markets may adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
To the extent there is turmoil in the global financial markets, this turmoil has the potential to adversely affect (i) the value of our properties; (ii) the availability or the terms of financing that we have or may anticipate utilizing; (iii) our ability to make principal and interest payments on, or refinance any outstanding debt when due; and (iv) the ability of our customers to enter into new leasing transactions or satisfy rental payments under existing leases. Disruptions in the capital and credit markets may also adversely affect our ability to make distributions and payments to our security holders and the market price of our securities.
Our business and operations could suffer in the event of system failures or cyber security attacks.
Despite system redundancy, the implementation of security measures and the existence of a disaster recovery plan for our internal information technology systems, our systems are vulnerable to damages from any number of sources, including energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication failures and cyber security attacks, such as computer viruses or unauthorized access. Any system failure or accident that causes interruptions in our operations could result in a material disruption to our business. We may also incur additional costs to remedy damages caused by such disruptions. Any compromise of our security could result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws, unauthorized access to information of ours and others, significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, loss or misuse of the information and a loss of confidence in our security measures, which could harm our business.
Risks associated with our dependence on key personnel.
We depend on the deep industry knowledge and the efforts of our executive officers and other key employees. From time to time, our personnel and their roles may change. While we believe that we are able to retain our key talent and find suitable employees to meet our personnel needs, the loss of key personnel, any change in their roles or the limitation of their availability could adversely affect our business. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain our executive officers, or if compensation costs required to attract and retain key employees become more expensive, our performance and competitive position could be materially adversely affected.
Our business could be adversely impacted if we have deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting.
The design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting may not prevent all errors, misstatements or misrepresentations. While management continually reviews the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, there can be no guarantee that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective in accomplishing all control objectives all of the time. Deficiencies, including any material weakness, in our internal control over financial reporting that may occur in the future could result in misstatements or restatements of our financial statements or a decline in the price of our securities.
The depreciation in the value of the foreign currency in countries where we have a significant investment may adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.
We pursue growth opportunities in international markets where the U.S. dollar is not the functional currency. At December 31, 2015, approximately $6.3 billion or 20.1% of our total assets are invested in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, primarily the British pound sterling, euro and Japanese yen. As a result, we are subject to foreign currency risk due to potential fluctuations in exchange rates between foreign currencies and the U.S. dollar. A significant change in the value of the foreign currency of one or more countries where we have a significant investment may have a material adverse effect on our business and, in particular, our U.S. dollar reported financial position and results of operations and debt covenant ratios. Although we attempt to mitigate adverse effects by borrowing under debt agreements denominated in foreign currencies and using derivative contracts, there can be no assurance that those attempts to mitigate foreign currency risk will be successful.
Our hedging of foreign currency and interest rate risk may not effectively limit our exposure to other risks.
Hedging arrangements involve risks, such as the risk of fluctuation in the relative value of the foreign currency or interest rates and the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements. The funds required to settle such arrangements could be significant depending on the stability and movement of the hedged foreign currency or the size of the underlying financing and the applicable interest rates at the time of the breakage. The failure to hedge effectively against exchange rate changes or interest rate changes may adversely affect our business.
Compliance or failure to comply with regulatory requirements could result in substantial costs.
We are required to comply with many regulations in different countries, including (but not limited to) the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom Bribery Act and similar laws and regulations. Our properties are also subject to various federal, state and local regulatory requirements, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act and state and local fire and life-safety requirements. Noncompliance could result in the imposition of governmental fines or the award of damages to private litigants. While we believe that we are currently in material compliance with these regulatory requirements, the requirements may change or new requirements may be imposed that could require significant unanticipated expenditures by us. If we are required to make unanticipated expenditures to comply with these regulations we may be adversely affected.
Risks Related to our Business
Real estate investments are not as liquid as certain other types of assets, which may reduce economic returns to investors.
Real estate investments are not as liquid as certain other types of investments and this lack of liquidity may limit our ability to react promptly to changes in economic or other conditions. Significant expenditures associated with real estate investments, such as secured mortgage payments, real estate taxes and maintenance costs, are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the investments. As a REIT, under the Internal Revenue Code, we are only able to hold property for sale in the ordinary course of business through taxable REIT subsidiaries in order to not incur punitive taxation on any tax gain from the sale of such property. We may dispose of certain properties that have been held for investment to generate liquidity. If we do not satisfy certain safe harbors or we believe there is too much risk of incurring the punitive tax on any tax gain from the sale, we may not pursue such sales.
7
We may decide to sell properties to certain of our unconsolidated co-investment ventures or third parties to generate proceeds to fund our capital deployment activities. Our ability to sell properties on advantageous terms is affected by: (i) competition from other owners of properties that are trying to dispose of their properties; (ii) market conditions, including the capitalization rates applicable to our properties; and (iii) other factors beyond our control. If our competitors sell assets similar to assets we intend to divest in the same markets or at valuations below our valuations for comparable assets, we may be unable to divest our assets at favorable pricing or at all. The unconsolidated co-investment venture or third party who might acquire our properties may need to have access to debt and equity capital, in the private and public markets, in order to acquire properties from us. Should they have limited or no access to capital on favorable terms, then dispositions could be delayed.
If we do not have sufficient cash available to us through our operations, sales or contributions of properties or available credit facilities to continue operating our business as usual, we may need to find alternative ways to increase our liquidity. Such alternatives may include, without limitation, divesting ourselves of properties, whether or not they otherwise meet our strategic objectives to keep in the long term, at less than optimal terms, incurring debt, entering into leases with new customers at lower rental rates or less than optimal terms or entering into lease renewals with our existing customers without an increase in rental rates. There can be no assurance, however, that such alternative ways to increase our liquidity will be available to us. Additionally, taking such measures to increase our liquidity may adversely affect our business, and in particular, our distributable cash flow and debt covenants.
Our investments are concentrated in the industrial distribution sector and our business would be adversely affected by an economic downturn in that sector.
Our investments in real estate assets are primarily concentrated in the industrial distribution sector. This concentration may expose us to the risk of economic downturns in this sector to a greater extent than if our business activities were more diversified.
General economic conditions and other events or occurrences that affect areas in which our properties are geographically concentrated, may impact financial results.
We are exposed to general economic conditions, local, regional, national and international economic conditions and other events and occurrences that affect the markets in which we own properties. Our operating performance is further impacted by the economic conditions of the specific markets in which we have concentrations of properties.
At December 31, 2015, approximately 31.9% of our consolidated operating properties or $7.7 billion (based on gross book value, or investment before depreciation) are located in California, which represented 25.1% of the aggregate square footage of our operating properties and 31.0% of our net operating income. Our revenue from, and the value of, our properties located in California may be affected by local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of or reduced demand for industrial properties) and the local economic climate. Business layoffs, downsizing, industry slowdowns, changing demographics and other factors may adversely impact California’s economic climate. Because of the number of properties we have located in California, a downturn in California’s economy or real estate conditions could adversely affect our business.
In addition to California, we also have significant holdings (defined as more than 3.0% of total investment before depreciation) in operating properties in certain global and regional markets located in Atlanta, Central and Eastern Pennsylvania, Chicago, Dallas/Fort Worth, New Jersey/New York City, and South Florida. Our operating performance could be adversely affected if conditions become less favorable in any of the markets in which we have a concentration of properties. Conditions such as an oversupply of distribution space or a reduction in demand for distribution space, among other factors, may impact operating conditions. Any material oversupply of distribution space or material reduction in demand for distribution space could adversely affect our overall business.
In addition, our owned and managed portfolio, including the unconsolidated co-investment ventures in which we invest, has concentrations of properties in the same markets mentioned above, as well as in markets in France, Germany, Japan, Mexico and the United Kingdom, and are subject to the economic conditions in those markets.
A number of our investments, both wholly-owned and owned through co-investment ventures, are located in areas that are known to be subject to earthquake activity. U.S. properties located in active seismic areas include properties in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, and Seattle. International properties located in active seismic areas include Japan and Mexico. We generally carry earthquake insurance on our properties located in areas historically subject to seismic activity, subject to coverage limitations and deductibles, if we believe it is commercially reasonable. We evaluate our earthquake insurance coverage annually in light of current industry practice through an analysis prepared by outside consultants and in some specific instances have elected to self-insure our earthquake exposure based on this analysis. We have elected not to carry earthquake insurance for our assets in Japan based on this analysis.
Furthermore, a number of our properties are located in areas that are known to be subject to hurricane or flood risk. We carry hurricane and flood hazard insurance on all of our properties located in areas historically subject to such activity, subject to coverage limitations and deductibles, if we believe it is commercially reasonable. We evaluate our insurance coverage annually in light of current industry practice through an analysis prepared by outside consultants.
Investments in real estate properties are subject to risks that could adversely affect our business.
Investments in real estate properties are subject to varying degrees of risk. While we seek to minimize these risks through geographic diversification of our portfolio, market research and our asset management capabilities, these risks cannot be eliminated. Factors that may affect real estate values include:
local conditions, such as a reduction in demand for distribution space in an area due to oversupply and obsolescence, such as changes in technology, may impact the supply chain for ourselves and our customers;
the attractiveness of our properties to potential customers and competition from other available properties;
increasing costs of maintaining, insuring, renovating and making improvements to our properties;
our ability to rehabilitate and reposition our properties due to changes in the business needs of our customers;
our ability to control rents and variable operating costs; and
governmental regulations and the associated potential liability under, and changes in, environmental, zoning, usage, tax and other laws.
We may be unable to lease vacant space or renew leases or re-lease space on favorable terms as leases expire.
Our operating results and distributable cash flow would be adversely affected if a significant number of our customers were unable to meet their lease obligations. We are also subject to the risk that, upon the expiration of leases for space located in our properties, leases may not be renewed by existing customers, the space may not be
8
re-leased to new customers or the terms of renewal or re-leasing (including the cost of required renovations or concessions to customers) may be less favorable to us than current lease terms. Our competitors may offer space at rental rates below current market rates or below the rental rates we currently charge our customers, we may lose potential customers, and we may be pressured to reduce our rental rates below those we currently charge to retain customers when our customers’ leases expire. In the event of default by a significant number of customers, we may experience delays and incur substantial costs in enforcing our rights as landlord, and we may be unable to re-lease spaces. A customer may experience a downturn in its business, which may cause the loss of the customer or may weaken its financial condition, resulting in the customer’s failure to make rental payments when due or requiring a restructuring that might reduce cash flow from the lease. In addition, a customer may seek the protection of bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws, which could result in the rejection and termination of such customer’s lease and thereby cause a reduction in our available cash flow.
We may acquire properties, which involves risks that could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
We have acquired properties and will continue to acquire properties, both through the direct acquisition of real estate and through the acquisition of entities that own the real estate and through additional investments in co-investment ventures that acquire properties. The acquisition of properties involves risks, including the risk that the acquired property will not perform as anticipated and that any actual costs for rehabilitation, repositioning, renovation and improvements identified in the pre-acquisition due diligence process will exceed estimates. When we acquire properties, we may face risks associated with a lack of market knowledge or understanding of the local economy, forging new business relationships in the area and unfamiliarity with local government and permitting procedures. Additionally, there is, and it is expected there will continue to be, significant competition for properties that meet our investment criteria as well as risks associated with obtaining financing for acquisition activities. The acquired properties or entities may be subject to liabilities, which may be without any recourse, or with only limited recourse, with respect to unknown liabilities. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based on ownership of any of these entities or properties, then we may have to pay substantial sums to settle it.
Our real estate development strategies may not be successful.
Our real estate development strategy is focused on monetizing land in the future through sales to third parties, development of industrial properties to hold for long-term investment or contribution or sale to a co-investment venture or third party, depending on market conditions, our liquidity needs and other factors. We may increase our investment in the development, renovation and redevelopment business and we expect to complete the build-out and leasing of our current development portfolio. We may also develop, renovate and redevelop properties within existing or newly formed co-investment ventures. The real estate development, renovation and redevelopment business includes the following significant risks:
we may not be able to obtain financing for development projects on favorable terms or at all;
we may explore development opportunities that may be abandoned and the related investment impaired;
we may not be able to obtain, or may experience delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other governmental permits and authorizations;
we may have construction costs, total investment amounts and our share of remaining funding that exceed our estimates and projects may not be completed, delivered or stabilized as planned due to defects or other issues;
we may not be able to attract third-party investment in new development co-investment ventures or sufficient customer demand for our product;
we may have properties that perform below anticipated levels, producing cash flow below budgeted amounts;
we may seek to sell certain land parcels and not be able to find a third party to acquire such land or the sales price will not allow us to recover our investment, resulting in impairment charges;
we may not be able to lease properties we develop on favorable terms or at all;
we may not be able to capture the anticipated enhanced value created by our value-added properties on expected timetables or at all;
we may experience delays (temporary or permanent) if there is public or government opposition to our activities; and
we may have substantial renovation, new development and redevelopment activities, regardless of their ultimate success, that require a significant amount of management’s time and attention, diverting their attention from our day-to-day operations.
We are subject to risks and liabilities in connection with forming co-investment ventures, investing in new or existing co-investment ventures, attracting third-party investment and investing in and managing properties through co-investment ventures.
At December 31, 2015, we had investments in real estate containing approximately 393 million square feet held through co-investment ventures, both public and private. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of available funds that we may invest in these ventures, and we may and currently intend to develop and acquire properties through co-investment ventures and investments in other entities when warranted by the circumstances. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to form new co-investment ventures, or attract third-party investment or that additional investments in new or existing ventures to develop or acquire properties will be successful. Further, there can be no assurance that we are able to realize value from such investments.
Our co-investment ventures involve certain additional risks that we do not otherwise face, including:
our partners may share certain approval rights over major decisions made on behalf of the ventures;
if our partners fail to fund their share of any required capital contributions, then we may choose to contribute such capital;
our partners might have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals that would affect our ability to operate the property;
the venture or other governing agreements often restrict the transfer of an interest in the co-investment venture or may otherwise restrict our ability to sell the interest when we desire or on advantageous terms;
our relationships with our partners are generally contractual in nature and may be terminated or dissolved under the terms of the agreements, and in such event, we may not continue to manage or invest in the assets underlying such relationships resulting in reduced fee revenue or causing a need to purchase such interest to continue ownership; and
disputes between us and our partners may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and directors from focusing their time and effort on our business and result in subjecting the properties owned by the applicable co-investment venture to additional risk.
We generally seek to maintain sufficient influence over our co-investment ventures to permit us to achieve our business objectives; however, we may not be able to continue to do so indefinitely. We have formed publicly traded investment vehicles, such as NPR and FIBRA Prologis, for which we serve as sponsor or manager. We have contributed, and may continue to contribute, assets into such vehicles. There is a risk that our managerial relationship may be terminated.
We are exposed to various environmental risks, including the potential impacts of future climate change, which may result in unanticipated losses that could affect our business and financial condition.
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner, developer or operator of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances. The costs of removal or remediation of such substances could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of such hazardous substances. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages based on personal injury, property damage or other costs, including investigation and clean-up costs, resulting from the environmental contamination.
Environmental laws in some countries, including the U.S., also require that owners or operators of buildings containing asbestos properly manage and maintain the asbestos, adequately inform or train those who may come into contact with asbestos and undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement, in the event that asbestos is disturbed during building renovation or demolition. These laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators who fail to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos. Some of our properties are known to contain asbestos-containing building materials.
In addition, some of our properties are leased or have been leased, in part, to owners and operators of businesses that use, store or otherwise handle petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances, creating a potential for the release of such hazardous or toxic substances. Furthermore, certain of our properties are on, adjacent to or near other properties that have contained or currently contain petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances, or upon which others have engaged, are engaged or may engage in activities that may release such hazardous or toxic substances. From time to time, we may acquire properties, or interests in properties, with known adverse environmental conditions for which we believe that the environmental liabilities associated with these conditions are quantifiable and that the acquisition will yield a superior risk-adjusted return. In connection with certain divested properties, we have agreed to remain responsible for, and to bear the cost of, remediating or monitoring certain environmental conditions on the properties.
We are also exposed to potential physical risks from possible future changes in climate. Our distribution facilities may be exposed to rare catastrophic weather events, such as severe storms or floods. If the frequency of extreme weather events increases due to climate change, our exposure to these events could increase. We do not currently consider ourselves to be exposed to regulatory risks related to climate change, as our operations generally do not emit a significant amount of greenhouse gases. However, we may be adversely impacted as a real estate developer in the future by potential impacts to the supply chain or stricter energy efficiency standards for buildings. We cannot give any assurance that other such conditions do not exist or may not arise in the future. The presence of such substances on our real estate properties could adversely affect our ability to lease, develop or sell such properties or to borrow using such properties as collateral, and this may have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition, and in particular, our distributable cash flow.
Our insurance coverage does not include all potential losses.
We and our unconsolidated co-investment ventures carry insurance coverage including property damage and rental loss insurance resulting from certain perils such as fire and additional perils as covered under an extended coverage policy, namely windstorm, flood, earthquake and terrorism; commercial general liability insurance; and environmental insurance, as appropriate for the markets where each of our properties and business operations are located. The insurance coverage contains policy specifications and insured limits customarily carried for similar properties, business activities and markets. We believe our properties and the properties of our unconsolidated co-investment ventures are adequately insured. Certain losses, however, including losses from floods, earthquakes, acts of war, acts of terrorism or riots, generally are not insured against or generally are not fully insured against because it is not deemed economically feasible or prudent to do so. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs with respect to one or more of our properties, we could experience a significant loss of capital invested and future revenues in these properties and could potentially remain obligated under any recourse debt associated with the property.
Furthermore, we cannot be sure that the insurance companies will be able to continue to offer products with sufficient coverage at commercially reasonable rates. If we experience a loss that is uninsured or that exceeds insured limits with respect to one or more of our properties or if the insurance companies fail to meet their coverage commitments to us in the event of an insured loss, then we could lose the capital invested in the damaged properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from those properties and, if there is recourse debt, then we would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the properties. Any such losses or higher insurance costs could adversely affect our business.
Risks Related to Financing and Capital
We may be unable to refinance our debt or our cash flow may be insufficient to make required debt payments.
We are subject to risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that our cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest. There can be no assurance that we will be able to refinance any maturing indebtedness, that such refinancing would be on terms as favorable as the terms of the maturing indebtedness, or that we will be able to otherwise obtain funds by selling assets or raising equity to make required payments on maturing indebtedness. If we are unable to refinance our indebtedness at maturity or meet our payment obligations, our business and financial condition will be negatively impacted and, if the maturing debt is secured, the lender may foreclose on the property securing such indebtedness. Our credit facilities and certain other debt bears interest at variable rates. Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense under these agreements.
Covenants in our credit agreements could limit our flexibility and breaches of these covenants could adversely affect our financial condition.
The terms of our various credit agreements, including our credit facilities, the indentures under which our senior notes are issued and other note agreements, require us to comply with a number of customary financial covenants, such as maintaining debt service coverage, leverage ratios, fixed charge ratios and other operating covenants including maintaining insurance coverage. These covenants may limit our flexibility to run our business, and breaches of these covenants could result in defaults under the instruments governing the applicable indebtedness. If we default under the covenant provisions and are unable to cure the default, refinance the indebtedness or meet payment obligations, our business and financial condition generally and, in particular, the amount of our distributable cash flow could be adversely affected.
Adverse changes in our credit ratings could negatively affect our financing activity.
The credit ratings of our senior unsecured notes and preferred stock are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position and other factors employed by the credit rating agencies in their rating analyses of us. Our credit ratings can affect the amount of capital we can access, as well as the terms and pricing of any debt we may incur. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our current credit ratings, and in the event our credit ratings are downgraded, we would likely incur higher borrowing costs and may encounter difficulty in obtaining additional financing. Also, a downgrade in our credit ratings may trigger additional payments or other negative consequences under our credit facilities and other debt instruments. Adverse changes in our credit ratings could negatively impact our business and, in particular, our refinancing and other capital market activities, our ability to manage debt maturities, our future growth and our development and acquisition activity.
At December 31, 2015, our credit ratings were Baa1 from Moody’s and BBB+ from S&P, both with outlook stable. A securities rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating organization.
We depend on external sources of capital.
To qualify as a REIT, we are required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends-paid deduction and by excluding any net capital gain) and we may be subject to tax to the extent our taxable income is not fully distributed. Historically, we have satisfied these distribution requirements by making cash distributions to our stockholders, but we may choose to satisfy these requirements by making distributions of cash or other property, including, in limited circumstances, our own stock. For distributions with respect to taxable years that ended on or before December 31, 2015, and in some cases declared as late as December 31, 2016, a REIT can satisfy up to 90% of the distribution requirements discussed above through the distribution of shares of our stock if certain conditions are met. Assuming we continue to satisfy these distribution requirements with cash, we may not be able to fund all future capital needs, including acquisition and development activities, from cash retained from operations and may have to rely on third-party sources of capital. Furthermore, to maintain our REIT status and not have to pay federal income and excise taxes, we may need to borrow funds on a short-term basis to meet the REIT distribution requirements even if the then-prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings. These short-term borrowing needs could result from differences in timing between the actual receipt of cash and inclusion of income for federal income tax purposes, or the effect of nondeductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt or amortization payments. Our ability to access debt and equity capital on favorable terms or at all depends on a number of factors, including general market conditions, the market’s perception of our growth potential, our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions and the market price of our securities.
Our stockholders may experience dilution if we issue additional common stock or units in the Operating Partnership.
Any additional future issuance of common stock or operating partnership units will reduce the percentage of our common stock and units owned by investors. In most circumstances, stockholders and unitholders will not be entitled to vote on whether or not we issue additional common stock or units. In addition, depending on the terms and pricing of any additional offering of our common stock or units and the value of the properties, our stockholders and unitholders may experience dilution in both book value and fair value of their common stock or units.
Income Tax Risks
The failure of Prologis, Inc. to qualify as a REIT would have serious adverse consequences.
Prologis, Inc. elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 1997. We believe we have operated Prologis, Inc. to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and believe that the current organization and method of operation comply with the rules and regulations promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code to enable Prologis, Inc. to continue to qualify as a REIT. However, it is possible that we are organized or have operated in a manner that would not allow Prologis, Inc. to qualify as a REIT, or that our future operations could cause Prologis, Inc. to fail to qualify. Qualification as a REIT requires us to satisfy numerous requirements (some annually and others on a quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex sections of the Internal Revenue Code for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. For example, to qualify as a REIT, Prologis, Inc. must derive at least 95% of its gross income in any year from qualifying sources. In addition, Prologis, Inc. must pay dividends to its stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of its taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding capital gains) and must satisfy specified asset tests on a quarterly basis. The provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury regulations regarding qualification as a REIT are more complicated for Prologis, Inc. because we hold assets through the Operating Partnership.
If Prologis, Inc. fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be required to pay federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless we are entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, Prologis, Inc. would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which it lost the qualification. If Prologis, Inc. lost its REIT status, our net earnings would be significantly reduced for each of the years involved.
Furthermore, we own a direct or indirect interest in certain subsidiary REITs that elected to be taxed as REITs under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. Provided that each subsidiary REIT qualifies as a REIT, our interest in such subsidiary REIT will be treated as a qualifying real estate asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, and any dividend income or gains derived by us from such subsidiary REIT will generally be treated as income that qualifies for purposes of the REIT gross income tests. To qualify as a REIT, the subsidiary REIT must independently satisfy all of the REIT qualification requirements. If such subsidiary REIT were to fail to qualify as a REIT, and certain relief provisions did not apply, it would be treated as a regular taxable corporation and its income would be subject to U.S. federal income tax. In addition, a failure of the subsidiary REIT to qualify as a REIT would have an adverse effect on the ability of Prologis, Inc. to comply with the REIT income and asset tests, and thus its ability to qualify as a REIT.
Certain property transfers may generate prohibited transaction income, resulting in a penalty tax on gain attributable to the transaction.
From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise dispose of some of our properties, including by contributing properties to our co-investment ventures. Under the Internal Revenue Code, any gain resulting from transfers of properties we hold as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business is treated as income from a prohibited transaction subject to a 100% penalty tax. We do not believe that our transfers or disposals of property or our contributions of properties into our co-investment ventures are prohibited transactions. However, whether property is held for investment purposes is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. The Internal Revenue Service may contend that certain transfers or dispositions of properties by us or contributions of properties into our co-investment ventures are prohibited transactions. While we believe that the Internal Revenue Service would not prevail in any such dispute, if the Internal Revenue Code were to argue successfully that a transfer, disposition or contribution of property constituted a prohibited transaction, we would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on any gain allocable to us from the prohibited transaction. In addition, income from a prohibited transaction might adversely affect our ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a REIT.
11
Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect us.
In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial and administrative changes have been made to the U.S. and foreign income tax laws applicable to investments in real estate, REITs, similar entities and investments. Additional changes are likely to continue to occur in the future, both in and outside of the U.S. and may impact our taxation or that of our stockholders.
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
ITEM 2. Properties
We are invested in real estate properties that are predominately industrial properties. Our properties are typically used for distribution, storage, packaging, assembly and light manufacturing of consumer and industrial products. The vast majority of our operating properties are used by our customers for bulk distribution.
We manage our business on an owned and managed basis whether a property is wholly owned by us or owned by one of our co-investment ventures. We believe that the operating fundamentals of our owned and managed portfolio are consistent with those of our consolidated portfolio and therefore allow us to make business decisions based on the property operations versus our ownership. As such, we have included operating property information for Real Estate Operations and our owned and managed portfolio. The owned and managed portfolio includes the properties we consolidate and the properties owned by our unconsolidated co-investment ventures reflected at 100% of the ventures, not our proportionate share.
Included in Real Estate Operations are 628 buildings owned primarily by two co-investment ventures that we consolidate but of which we own less than 100% of the equity. No individual property or group of properties operating as a single business unit amounted to 10% or more of our consolidated total assets at December 31, 2015, or generated income equal to 10% or more of our consolidated gross revenues for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Dollars and square feet in the following tables are in thousands:
Operating properties
Rentable Square Footage
Gross Book Value
Encumbrances (1)
Global Markets – Americas:
United States:
Atlanta
16,230
722,676
132,507
18,114
831,839
Baltimore/Washington D.C.
6,101
539,482
80,705
8,208
723,546
Central Valley California
10,093
551,860
44,168
10,640
580,839
Central and Eastern Pennsylvania
16,243
1,017,318
55,708
Chicago
38,455
2,300,227
235,910
44,670
2,779,501
Dallas/Fort Worth
21,481
1,103,577
244,606
25,171
1,381,382
Houston
8,862
511,306
70,604
12,661
820,736
New Jersey/New York City
28,691
2,765,626
360,750
33,213
3,359,465
San Francisco Bay Area
16,172
1,671,409
46,876
19,836
2,033,053
Seattle
7,126
672,340
52,775
14,228
1,364,780
South Florida
10,996
1,161,357
129,286
14,700
1,500,384
Southern California
58,537
5,453,129
542,791
69,493
6,586,265
Canada
7,751
589,494
140,449
Mexico:
Guadalajara
291
16,759
-
5,897
315,366
Mexico City
308
17,204
11,476
799,521
Monterrey
3,915
236,275
Brazil
6,705
360,697
Regional Markets – Americas:
Austin
2,313
154,594
34,945
Charlotte
2,527
117,130
30,124
Cincinnati
5,899
250,696
68,686
Columbus
7,793
278,382
55,663
Denver
5,286
314,169
50,654
Indianapolis
5,321
238,137
58,497
Las Vegas
6,088
419,074
28,124
Louisville
6,108
314,272
Memphis
3,360
121,054
3,391
Nashville
5,189
203,193
60,944
Orlando
3,770
251,982
18,327
4,176
279,014
Phoenix
2,137
116,775
12,560
Portland
2,896
216,283
50,965
Reno
4,678
230,734
35,735
San Antonio
5,462
250,555
49,840
Juarez
3,106
137,501
Reynosa
163
7,491
4,548
214,931
Tijuana
4,217
206,873
Other Markets – United States
2,885
195,884
3,261
242,427
Subtotal Americas
319,212
22,774,169
2,695,590
407,286
29,586,255
Global Markets – Europe:
Belgium
439
28,914
2,499
161,424
Czech Republic
752
39,028
9,683
578,923
France
1,766
77,928
34,636
2,263,133
Germany
681
32,873
21,266
1,560,515
Italy
1,277
69,230
9,801
509,152
Netherlands
16,202
1,198,617
Poland
1,665
63,616
23,794
1,322,646
Spain
449
36,120
8,658
563,436
United Kingdom
950
98,786
22,591
3,118,419
Regional Markets – Europe:
Hungary
6,312
339,076
Slovakia
287
14,043
5,151
299,549
Sweden
806
47,611
4,255
318,760
Other Markets – Europe
115
8,947
Subtotal Europe
9,187
517,096
164,963
12,242,597
Global Markets – Asia:
China
2,324
74,210
10,634
499,884
Japan
2,646
324,128
118,779
23,553
3,696,737
Singapore
959
131,134
Subtotal Asia
5,929
529,472
35,146
4,327,755
Total operating portfolio (2)
334,328
23,820,737
2,814,369
607,395
46,156,607
Value-added properties
3,930
260,275
32,176
7,341
443,171
Total operating properties
338,258
24,081,012
2,846,545
614,736
46,599,778
13
Consolidated – Investment in Land
Consolidated – Development Portfolio
Acres
Estimated Build Out Potential
(sq. ft.) (3)
Current Investment
TEI (4)
232
3,271
12,742
39
400
1,568
1,178
23,312
82,109
1,405
94,544
309
3,941
39,763
1,514
92,322
470
8,896
26,521
277
19,303
238
4,111
31,447
3,492
214,445
78
1,427
10,991
213
16,710
164
2,417
64,031
1,219
161,895
1,155
134,234
306
5,914
152,797
269
5,476
79,729
1,792
178,150
184
3,292
46,967
483
37,777
918
11,430
262
4,950
124,351
1,328
93,352
166
2,622
31,626
103
739
205
12,095
520
23,959
25
450
1,760
855
79,116
196
2,212
252
19,386
231
981
58
1,199
9,594
608
49,427
145
2,482
7,296
299
19,246
48
702
12,055
421
33,235
56
1,018
4,840
33
61
108
1,781
4,663
567
39,536
17,797
124
2,442
12,675
461
25,865
194
3,422
12,144
127
7,004
626
5,723
373
5,611
24,331
5,138
91,243
815,146
17,499
1,369,398
27
526
8,744
226
3,713
41,275
627
35,708
381
7,115
66,475
1,467
85,590
65
1,308
16,433
1,990
135,992
91
2,450
20,813
46
1,538
28,678
1,075
79,375
599
11,645
64,175
33,231
100
2,021
19,336
259
4,372
122,578
1,434
229,158
330
5,604
31,624
88
3,694
67
1,413
10,251
274
14,825
2,191
41,705
430,382
7,624
617,573
172
5,617
57
2,597
108,649
7,109
948,555
75
2,769
114,266
Total land and development portfolio
7,404
135,717
1,359,794
32,232
2,935,526
Certain of our consolidated properties are pledged as security under secured mortgage debt and assessment bonds at December 31, 2015. For purposes of this table, the total principal balance of a debt issuance that is secured by a pool of properties is allocated among the properties in the pool based on each property’s investment balance. In addition to the amounts reflected here, we also have $76.2 million of encumbrances related to other real estate properties not included in Real Estate Operations. See Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for additional identification of the properties pledged.
14
(2)
Included in our operating portfolio are properties that we consider to be held for contribution and are presented as Assets Held for Sale or Contribution in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We include these properties in our operating portfolio as they are expected to be contributed to our co-investment ventures and remain in our owned and managed operating portfolio.
(3)
Represents the estimated finished square feet available for rent upon development of an industrial building on existing parcels of land included in this table.
(4)
Represents the TEI when the property under development is completed and leased. This includes the cost of land and development and leasing costs. At December 31, 2015, 64% of the properties under development in the development portfolio were expected to be complete by December 31, 2016, and 36% of the properties in the development portfolio were already completed but not yet stabilized.
The following table summarizes our investment in consolidated real estate properties at December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
Investment Before Depreciation
Industrial operating properties
23,735,745
Development portfolio, including cost of land (book value)
1,872,903
Land
Other real estate investments (1)
552,926
Total consolidated real estate properties
27,521,368
Included in other real estate investments are: (i) certain non-industrial real estate; (ii) land parcels that are ground leased to third parties; (iii) our corporate office buildings; (iv) infrastructure costs related to projects we are developing on behalf of others; (v) earnest money deposits associated with potential acquisitions and (vi) costs related to future development projects, including purchase options on land.
We generally lease our properties on a long-term basis (with a weighted average lease term of six years). The following table summarizes the lease expirations of our consolidated operating portfolio for leases in place at December 31, 2015, without giving effect to the exercise of renewal options or termination rights, if any (dollars and square feet in thousands):
NER
Number of Leases
Occupied Square Feet
Dollars
Percent of Total
Dollars Per Square Foot
2016
936
43,424
190,025
12.2
%
4.42
2017
1,037
61,727
275,698
17.8
4.48
2018
884
54,531
262,764
16.9
4.83
2019
40,040
191,063
12.3
4.80
2020
525
30,860
159,540
10.3
5.20
2021
289
29,746
138,775
8.9
4.77
2022
125
14,495
67,487
4.3
4.68
2023
70
7,522
41,400
2.7
5.50
2024
52
7,335
44,148
6.09
2025
11,808
68,310
4.4
5.79
Thereafter
90
17,417
115,147
7.4
6.61
4,636
318,905
1,554,357
4.90
Month to month
188
5,765
4,824
324,670
Included in our owned and managed portfolio are consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment ventures that hold investments in real estate properties, primarily industrial properties that we also manage. Our unconsolidated co-investment ventures are accounted for under the equity method. The following table summarizes our consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment ventures, and represents 100% of the ventures, not our proportionate share, at December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
Operating Properties
Square Feet
Gross
Book Value
Investment
in Land
Development Portfolio – TEI
Consolidated Co-Investment Ventures
Americas:
Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture
72,733
6,155,605
69,194
55,676
Prologis North American Industrial Fund
43,577
2,569,330
Totals
116,310
8,724,935
Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures
Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund
49,935
4,669,237
FIBRA Prologis
32,396
1,869,013
2,435
12,954
Prologis Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I (“Brazil Fund”)
and related joint ventures (1)
104,700
174,913
89,036
6,898,947
107,135
187,867
Europe:
Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund
21,830
2,212,909
1,739
Prologis European Properties Fund II
70,577
5,166,146
1,127
52,469
Europe Logistics Venture 1
5,623
386,691
Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl
60,195
4,055,790
12,251
6,145
158,225
11,821,536
15,117
58,614
Asia:
Nippon Prologis REIT
20,907
3,372,609
Prologis China Logistics Venture
8,310
425,674
84,557
582,157
29,217
3,798,283
276,478
22,518,766
206,809
828,638
We have a 50% ownerships interest in and consolidate an entity that in turn owns 50% of several entities that we account for on the equity method. Also, we have additional investments in other unconsolidated entities in Brazil that we account for on the equity method with various ownership interests ranging from 5 to 50%.
For more information regarding our unconsolidated co-investment ventures, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we and our unconsolidated co-investment ventures are parties to a variety of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that, with respect to any such matters to which we are currently a party, the ultimate disposition of any such matter will not result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol “PLD.” The following table sets forth the high and low sale price of our common stock, as reported in the NYSE Composite Tape, and the declared dividends per share, for the periods indicated.
High
Low
Dividends
2015
First Quarter
47.56
41.15
0.36
Second Quarter
44.48
37.03
Third Quarter
42.49
36.26
0.40
Fourth Quarter
43.69
38.66
2014
42.10
36.33
0.33
42.66
39.72
42.38
37.28
44.05
37.12
Our future common stock dividends, if and as declared, may vary and will be determined by the Board upon the circumstances prevailing at the time, including our financial condition, operating results, estimated taxable income and REIT distribution requirements, and these dividends, if and as declared, may be adjusted at the discretion of the Board during the year.
On February 12, 2016, we had approximately 524,774,000 shares of common stock outstanding, which were held of record by approximately 4,940 stockholders.
Stock Performance Graph
The following line graph compares the change in Prologis, Inc. cumulative total stockholder’s return on shares of its common stock from December 31, 2010, to the cumulative total return of the S&P 500 Stock Index and the Financial Times and Stock Exchange NAREIT Equity REITs Index from December 31, 2010, to December 31, 2015. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 in our common stock and each of the indices on December 31, 2010, and, as required by the SEC, the reinvestment of all dividends. The return shown on the graph is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
This graph and the accompanying text are not “soliciting material,” are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference in any filing by the company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.
At December 31, 2015, and 2014, we had one series of preferred stock outstanding – the “Series Q preferred stock.” Dividends payable per share were $4.27 for the years ended December 31, 2015, and 2014.
For more information regarding dividends, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the fourth quarter of 2015, we issued common units and Class A Units of the Operating Partnership (see Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8). The issuance of common units and Class A Units was undertaken in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, afforded by Section 4(a)(2) thereof.
For information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans, see Notes 10 and 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8.
Common Stock Plans
Further information relative to our equity compensation plans will be provided in our 2016 Proxy Statement or in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table summarizes selected financial data related to our historical financial condition and results of operations for both Prologis, Inc. and the Operating Partnership (in millions, except for per share and unit amounts):
Years Ended December 31,
2013
2012
2011 (1)
Operating Data:
Total revenues
2,197
1,761
1,961
1,422
Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation of equity investments
upon acquisition of a controlling interest, net of impairment charges
759
726
715
72
Consolidated net earnings (loss)
926
(106
)
(275
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders and unitholders – Basic:
Continuing operations (2)
1.66
1.25
(0.35
(0.83
Discontinued operations (2) (3)
0.25
0.17
0.32
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders and unitholders – Basic
0.65
(0.18
(0.51
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders and unitholders – Diluted:
Continuing operations
1.64
1.24
0.39
(0.34
(0.82
Discontinued operations (3)
0.16
0.31
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders and unitholders – Diluted
0.64
Dividends per common share and distributions per common unit
1.52
1.32
1.12
1.06
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets (4)
31,395
25,775
24,534
27,268
27,676
Total debt (4)
11,627
9,337
8,973
11,749
11,334
FFO (5):
Reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to FFO:
Net earnings (loss) attributable to common shares
863
622
315
(81
(188
Total NAREIT defined adjustments
504
633
660
Total our defined adjustments
(15
(33
(60
FFO, as defined by Prologis (5)
1,309
888
552
412
Total core defined adjustments
(128
(42
182
Core FFO (5)
1,181
953
813
814
594
In 2011, AMB Property Corporation (“AMB”) completed a merger (the “Merger”) with ProLogis, a Maryland REIT (“ProLogis”). In the Merger, AMB was the legal acquirer and ProLogis was the accounting acquirer. Following the Merger, AMB changed its name to Prologis, Inc. In 2011, we also completed an acquisition of one of our unconsolidated ventures in Europe. Activity in 2011 included five months of results of ProLogis, as it was the accounting acquirer in the Merger and seven months of results of the combined company resulting from the Merger and the acquisition in Europe.
For 2015, 2014 and 2013, the amounts for the Operating Partnership were the same as Prologis, Inc. Net earnings (loss) attributable to common unitholders for the Operating Partnership was $(0.34) and $0.16 for continuing operations and discontinued operations, respectively, in 2012, and was $(0.82) and $0.31 for continuing operations and discontinued operations, respectively, in 2011.
In 2014, the accounting standard changed for classifying and reporting discontinued operations and as such, none of our dispositions in 2015 or 2014 met the qualifications to be reported as discontinued operations.
In 2015, we early adopted an accounting standard that required the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet to be shown as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than as a deferred charge included in assets and we began presenting debt issuance costs in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability. At December 31, 2015, we have $52.3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs included in Debt in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This adoption resulted in the reclassification of $43.2 million, $37.7 million, $42.4 million and $47.6 million of unamortized debt issuance costs for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
(5)
FFO; FFO, as defined by Prologis and Core FFO are not determined in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and are measures commonly used in the real estate industry. See below for our definition of FFO and a complete reconciliation to net earnings in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this report and the matters described under Item 1A. Risk Factors.
We believe the scale and quality of our operating platform, the skills of our team and the strength of our balance sheet gives us unique competitive advantages. Our plan to grow revenue, earnings, net operating income (“NOI”), cash flows and Core FFO (see below for definition of Core FFO and a complete reconciliation to net earnings) is based on the following:
Rising Rents. Market rents are increasing across many of our markets. We expect rent growth to continue as demand for logistics facilities is strong in many markets across the globe. Because many of our leases originated during low rent periods following the global financial crisis, in-place leases have room for growth, which translates into increased earnings, NOI and cash flow both on a consolidated basis and through the amounts we recognize from our unconsolidated co-investment ventures based on our ownership share. We had positive rent change on rollovers (when comparing the net effective rent of the new lease to the prior lease for the same space) on our owned and managed operating portfolio every quarter for the last three years. We had quarterly increases from 9.5% to 14.4% during 2015.
Value Creation from Development. We believe a successful development program involves maintaining control of well-positioned land. On the basis of our current estimates, our owned and managed land bank has the potential to support the development of more than 154 million additional square feet of industrial space. We believe the carrying value of our land bank is below its current fair value, and we expect to realize this value going forward through development of our strategic land and dispositions of nonstrategic land. During 2015, in our owned and managed portfolio, we stabilized development projects with a TEI of $1.8 billion. Post stabilization, we estimate the value of these buildings will be approximately 32% more than their book value or the cost to develop (defined as estimated margin and calculated using estimated yield and capitalization rates from our underwriting models).
Economies of Scale from Growth in Assets Under Management. We believe we have the infrastructure that will allow us to increase our investments in real estate, with minimal increases to general and administrative (“G&A”) expenses. During 2015, our owned and managed real estate assets increased through the acquisition of 73.7 million square feet of operating properties, principally through the acquisition of the real estate portfolio of KTR Capital Partners and its affiliates (“KTR”). We completed and integrated this acquisition with minimal increases in gross overhead that were related to property management functions.
Summary of 2015
During the year ended December 31, 2015, we completed the following activities as further described in the Consolidated Financial Statements:
In May, we acquired the real estate assets and operating platform of KTR. The portfolio consisted of 315 operating properties aggregating 59 million square feet, 3.6 million square feet of properties under development and land parcels that will support an estimated build out of 6.8 million square feet. The total assets were valued at $5.8 billion. The properties were acquired by our consolidated co-investment venture Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture (“USLV”), of which we own 55%. The acquisition was funded through cash, the assumption of debt and the issuance of 4.5 million common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership.
In connection with an acquisition of a portfolio of properties in October, we issued 9.1 million units in the Operating Partnership, which included 8.9 million units of a new class of common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership designated as Class A convertible common limited partnership units (“Class A Units”) in connection with an acquisition, for a total value of $371.6 million.
We issued $1.5 billion in senior notes, entered into $1.8 billion unsecured senior term loans and repurchased and tendered several series of senior notes for $0.7 billion. See further discussion on these transactions and other debt activity in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section below.
We generated net proceeds of $3.2 billion and net gains of $758.9 million from the contribution and disposition of real estate investments. The gains were driven by dispositions to third parties of $609.9 million, primarily in the United States, and property contributions of $149.0 million, primarily in Europe.
In March, the holders of the exchangeable notes exchanged $459.8 million of their notes for 11.9 million shares of common stock of the Parent and $0.2 million of their notes for cash.
We had significant development activity and strong operating metrics in 2015. See below, in Our Owned and Managed Portfolio section, for details of our development and operating activity.
This operating segment includes rental revenue and rental expense recognized from our consolidated operating properties. We had significant real estate activity during 2015 and 2014 that impacted the size of our consolidated portfolio. The 2015 results include approximately seven months of NOI from the properties acquired in the KTR acquisition (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on this transaction). The operating fundamentals in the markets in which we operate have been improving, which has positively affected both the occupancy and rental rates we have experienced and also has fueled development activity. This operating segment also includes revenue from land we own and lease to customers and development management and other revenue, net of acquisition, disposition and land holding costs.
Real Estate Operations NOI for the years ended December 31 was as follows (dollars in millions):
Rental and other revenues
1,549.6
1,192.2
1,239.5
Rental recoveries
437.1
348.7
331.5
Rental and other expenses
(609.9
(454.2
(478.9
Real Estate Operations – NOI
1,376.8
1,086.7
1,092.1
Operating margin
69.3
70.5
69.5
Average occupancy
95.3
94.5
93.6
Detail of our consolidated operating properties for the years ended December 31 was as follows (square feet in millions):
Number of properties
1,886
1,607
1,610
Square feet
338.3
282.3
267.1
Percentage occupied
96.4
96.3
94.9
The following were the key drivers of Real Estate Operations NOI:
Capital deployment activity within the portfolio, which included acquisitions, development stabilizations, contributions to co-investment ventures and dispositions to third parties, affected NOI as follows:
2015 as compared with 2014 ($236.9 million net increase)
o
KTR acquisition during the second quarter of 2015:
§
$175.7 million increase from property operations,
$24.7 million decrease from acquisition costs associated with the transaction,
approximately 45% of all KTR activity is offset in Less Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests in the Consolidated Statements of Income attributable to our venture partner’s share;
consolidation of Prologis North American Industrial Fund (“NAIF”) during the fourth quarter of 2014: $153.1 million increase; of which approximately 34% of all activity is offset in Less Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests;
other acquisitions and development activity: $53.3 million increase;
contribution activity: $56.4 million decrease;
disposition activity: $41.8 million decrease; and
$22.3 million decrease from increased acquisition costs, excluding KTR.
2014 as compared with 2013 ($63.7 million net decrease)
acquisitions and development activity: $84.8 million increase;
consolidation of NAIF: $35.8 million increase;
contribution activity: $140.3 million decrease; and
disposition activity: $44.0 million decrease.
NOI increased due to an increase in average occupancy in our operating properties of 80 basis points in 2015 from 2014 and 90 basis points in 2014 from 2013. The KTR properties were 89.2% occupied at the time of the acquisition, which decreased our average and period-end occupancy slightly.
We leased a total of 94.7 million square feet, or 29.7% of our average portfolio; 72.9 million square feet, or 27.5% of our average portfolio and 87.6 million square feet, or 32.1% of our average portfolio; during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
We recognize changes in rental revenue from contractual rent increases on existing leases. We recognize the total rental revenue under the lease on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease which includes all known contractual changes. If a lease has a contractual rent increase that is not known at the time the lease is signed, such as the consumer price index or a similar metric, the rent increase is not included in rent leveling; therefore, any rent increase will impact the rental revenue we recognize.
We experienced an increase in rental rates on the turnover of existing leases every quarter since 2012 that has resulted in higher average rental rates in our portfolio and increased rental revenue and NOI as those leases commenced.
Under the terms of our lease agreements, we are able to recover the majority of our rental expenses from customers. Rental expense recoveries, included in both rental revenue and rental expenses, were 80.5%, 81.0% and 73.4% of total rental expenses for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
We adopted a new accounting standard, effective January 1, 2014, that changed the criteria for classifying and reporting discontinued operations. The results of the third-party dispositions remained in continuing operations in 2015 and 2014, whereas in 2013, the results were reclassified to discontinued operations and not included in Real Estate Operations.
This operating segment includes revenue from fees and promotes earned for services performed for our unconsolidated co-investment ventures. This revenue is reduced generally by the direct costs associated with the asset management of these ventures and allocated property-level management costs for the properties owned by the ventures. Revenue associated with the Strategic Capital segment fluctuates because of the size of co-investment ventures under management, the transactional activity in the venture and the timing of promotes.
Strategic Capital NOI for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in millions):
Asset management and other fees
50.8
51.5
52.0
Leasing commissions, acquisition and other transaction fees
10.9
14.1
Promotes
31.3
6.4
Strategic capital expenses (1)
(47.5
(53.1
(53.7
14.2
42.0
18.8
71.3
53.2
16.0
10.6
29.5
Strategic capital expenses
(26.1
(29.2
(22.5
86.7
57.3
41.3
31.8
32.3
29.9
4.1
5.9
13.3
(14.9
(14.1
(13.1
21.0
24.1
30.1
Strategic Capital – NOI
121.9
123.4
90.2
Strategic Capital expenses for the Americas include employees who are employed in an office in the Americas who may also support other regions.
The following assets under management were held through our unconsolidated co-investment ventures at December 31 (dollars and square feet in millions):
Number of ventures
89.0
87.1
108.5
Total assets
6,890
7,056
8,004
158.3
147.4
132.9
11,343
11,440
11,800
29.2
26.2
22.9
4,320
4,120
4,014
Total:
276.5
260.7
264.3
22,553
22,616
23,818
The following were the key drivers of Strategic Capital NOI:
We contributed 31, 126 and 254 properties to several co-investment ventures during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The unconsolidated co-investment ventures acquired 43, 81 and 57 properties from third parties during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
In December 2015, we earned two promotes aggregating $56.6 million, principally from our co-investment venture Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl (“PELP”). Of that amount, $29.5 million represented the third-party investors’ portion and is reflected in Strategic Capital Revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
In June 2014, we earned a promote of $42.1 million from our co-investment venture Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund (“USLF”). Of that amount, $31.3 million represented the third-party investors’ portion and is reflected in Strategic Capital Revenue.
We acquired a controlling interest in our co-investment venture NAIF in the fourth quarter of 2014 and began consolidating the venture.
We formed the co-investment venture FIBRA Prologis in Mexico in June 2014, and in connection with this transaction, we concluded the Prologis Mexico Industrial Fund.
The amounts presented for Europe and Asia are shown in U.S. dollars and were impacted by fluctuations in exchange rates, primarily the euro, British pound sterling and Japanese yen to U.S. dollar. We have hedged the majority of our investment in euro, British pound sterling, and Japanese yen through outstanding debt and derivative instruments that offset the majority of these fluctuations.
The direct costs associated with Strategic Capital totaled $88.4 million, $96.5 million and $89.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and are included in the line item Strategic Capital Expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The fluctuations in Strategic Capital Expenses were due to the timing of promotes and the payment of the related bonus pursuant to the terms of the Prologis Promote Plan and due to the size of our co-investment ventures.
See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our unconsolidated co-investment ventures.
Our Owned and Managed Properties
We manage our business on an owned and managed basis including properties wholly owned by us or owned by one of our co-investment ventures. As further discussed, we believe that the operating fundamentals of our owned and managed portfolio are consistent with those of our consolidated portfolio. The activity in our owned and managed portfolio affects both our Real Estate Operations and Strategic Capital segments, as well as the net earnings we recognize from our unconsolidated co-investment ventures based on our ownership share.
Our owned and managed properties includes operating industrial properties and does not include properties under development or held for sale to third parties and was as follows at December 31 (square feet in millions):
Number of Properties
Square
Feet
Percentage Occupied
Consolidated
Unconsolidated
1,350
96.2
1,278
95.0
1,323
94.7
3,236
614.8
543.0
95.6
2,933
531.4
94.8
Operating Activity
The following table summarizes our operating activity for the years ended December 31 (square feet in millions):
Leased square feet
143.1
130.3
135.7
Average turnover costs per square foot
1.46
1.42
Rent change on rollover (low – high)
9.5% – 14.4%
6.2% – 9.7%
2.0% – 6.1%
Weighted average retention percentage on leased square feet
84.5
84.7
83.1
Weighted average lease term in months
43
42
Average turnover costs per square foot have increased in 2015, however the turnover costs as a percentage of the total value of the lease is in line or lower than previous periods. The total value of the leases signed have increased due to higher rents on rollover.
Retention is the square footage of all leases renewed by existing tenants divided by the square footage of all expiring and renewed leases during the reporting period, excluding the square footage of tenants that default or buy-out prior to expiration of their lease and the square footage of short-term leases.
Development Starts and Stabilization Activity
The following table summarizes development starts for the years ended December 31 (dollars and square feet in millions):
2015 (1)
Number of new property development during the period
96
76
68
28.1
26.0
23.0
TEI
2,247.0
2,033.5
1,770.5
Our proportionate share of TEI based on ownership
1,814.7
1,791.7
1,473.4
Percentage of build-to-suits based on TEI
43.6
32.6
41.8
Weighted average expected yield on TEI
7.2
7.6
Estimated value at completion
2,713.3
2,439.5
2,109.2
Estimated margin
20.7
20.0
19.1
We expect these developments to be completed before July 2017.
The following table summarizes development stabilization activity for the years ended December 31 (dollars and square feet in millions):
Number of development properties stabilized during the period
81
41
25.5
16.5
15.2
1,847.8
1,105.5
1,400.7
1,639.8
955.2
1,199.6
30.4
For information on our development portfolio at December 31, 2015, see Item 2. Properties.
Same Store Analysis
We evaluate the performance of the operating properties we own and manage using a “same store” analysis because the population of properties in this analysis is consistent from period to period, thereby eliminating the effects of changes in the composition of the portfolio on performance measures. We include properties from our consolidated portfolio, as well as properties owned by the unconsolidated co-investment ventures that we manage in our same store analysis. We have defined the same store portfolio, for each quarter in 2015, as those properties that were in operation at January 1, 2014, and have been in operation throughout the same three-month periods in both 2015 and 2014. We have removed all properties that were disposed of to a third party or were classified as held for sale to a third party from the population for both periods. We believe the factors that affect rental revenue, rental expenses and NOI in the same store portfolio are generally the same as for the total portfolio. To derive an appropriate measure of period-to-period operating performance, we remove the effects of foreign currency exchange rate movements by using the recent period end exchange rate to translate from local currency into the U.S. dollar, for both periods.
22
We calculate our same store results on a quarterly basis and provide a reconciliation of those results to the Consolidated Statements of Income. The following table summarizes same store NOI and the change from prior period for the four quarters of 2015 and on a cumulative annual basis and the square feet of the portfolio used in the calculation (dollars and square feet in millions):
Three Months Ended
March 31, (1)
June 30, (1)
September 30, (1)
December 31,
Full Year
2015 NOI – same store portfolio
578.6
584.8
591.8
587.2
2,342.4
2014 NOI – same store portfolio
558.8
559.4
565.4
561.7
2,245.3
Percentage change
3.5
4.7
Square feet of portfolio
511.7
508.2
504.8
491.7
A reconciliation of our same store results for these fiscal quarters to the Consolidated Statements of Income is provided in our previously filed quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the respective quarter.
The following is a reconciliation of our consolidated rental revenue, rental expenses and NOI (calculated as rental revenue and recoveries less rental expenses) for the full year, as included in the Consolidated Statements of Income, to the respective amounts in our same store portfolio analysis for the three months ended December 31 (dollars in millions):
March 31,
June 30,
September 30,
Rental revenue and recoveries
418.8
461.4
532.8
560.2
1,973.2
Rental expenses
126.9
125.6
139.9
150.8
543.2
NOI
291.9
335.8
392.9
409.4
1,430.0
388.2
381.3
355.8
402.0
1,527.3
110.5
109.6
102.3
108.4
430.8
277.7
271.7
253.5
293.6
1,096.5
Three Months Ended December 31,
Percentage Change
Rental Revenue (1) (2)
Consolidated:
Rental revenue as included in the Consolidated Statements of Income
435.6
307.6
Rental recoveries as included in the Consolidated Statements of Income
124.6
94.4
Consolidated adjustments to derive same store results:
Rental revenue and recoveries of properties not in the same store portfolio – properties developed,
acquired and sold to third parties during the period and land subject to ground leases
(177.3
(50.7
Effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other
(1.2
(3.1
Unconsolidated co-investment ventures – rental revenue
404.9
408.3
Same store portfolio – rental revenue (2)
786.6
756.5
4.0
Rental Expenses (1) (3)
Rental expenses as included in the Consolidated Statements of Income
Rental expenses of properties not in the same store portfolio – properties developed, acquired and
sold to third parties during the period and land subject to ground leases
(51.5
(16.4
7.7
9.0
Unconsolidated co-investment ventures – rental expenses
92.4
93.8
Same store portfolio – rental expenses (3)
199.4
194.8
2.4
NOI (1)
NOI as included in the Consolidated Statements of Income
NOI of properties not in the same store portfolio – properties developed, acquired and sold to third
parties during the period and land subject to ground leases
(125.8
(34.3
(8.9
(12.1
Unconsolidated co-investment ventures – NOI
312.5
314.5
Same store portfolio – NOI
As discussed, our same store portfolio includes industrial properties from our consolidated portfolio and owned by the unconsolidated co-investment ventures that are managed by us. We include 100% of the NOI from the properties in our same store portfolio. During the periods presented, certain properties owned by us were contributed to a co-investment venture and are included in the same store portfolio. Neither our consolidated results nor those of the co-investment ventures, when viewed individually, would be comparable on a same store basis because of the changes in composition of the respective portfolios from period to period (e.g. the results of a contributed property are included in our consolidated results through the contribution date and in the results of the unconsolidated entities subsequent to the contribution date).
We exclude the net termination and renegotiation fees from our same store rental revenue to allow us to evaluate the growth or decline in each property’s rental revenue without regard to items that are not indicative of the property’s recurring operating performance. Net termination and renegotiation fees represent the gross fee negotiated to allow a customer to terminate or renegotiate their lease, offset by the write-off of the asset recorded due to the adjustment to straight-line rents over the lease term. The adjustments to remove these items are included in “effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other” in this table.
23
Rental expenses include the direct operating expenses of the property such as property taxes, insurance and utilities. In addition, we include an allocation of the property management expenses for our direct-owned properties based on the property management services provided to each property (generally, based on a percentage of revenues). On consolidation, these amounts are eliminated and the actual costs of providing property management services are recognized as part of our consolidated rental expenses. These expenses fluctuate based on the level of properties included in the same store portfolio and any adjustment is included as “effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other” in this table.
Other Components of Income (Expense)
G&A Expenses
The following table summarizes G&A expenses for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
Gross overhead
461.1
461.6
434.9
Reported as rental expenses
(34.1
(30.0
(32.9
Reported as strategic capital expenses
(88.4
(96.5
(89.3
Capitalized amounts
(100.4
(87.3
(83.5
G&A expenses
238.2
247.8
229.2
Gross overhead includes all costs related to our business, including those attributable to the Real Estate Operations and Strategic Capital segments. We allocate a portion of our gross overhead that relates to property management functions to both segments based on the size of the respective portfolios. Costs directly associated with Strategic Capital also are allocated to that segment. The decrease in gross overhead from 2014 to 2015 was primarily due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the euro, British pound sterling and Japanese yen. The increase in gross overhead from 2013 to 2014 was principally due to increased compensation.
We capitalize certain costs directly related to our development and leasing activities. Capitalized G&A expenses included salaries and related costs, as well as other G&A costs. The following table summarizes capitalized G&A costs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
Building development activities
47.3
40.4
39.7
Leasing activities
21.3
17.9
18.3
Building and land improvements, and other
29.0
Total capitalized G&A expenses
100.4
87.3
83.5
Capitalized salaries and related costs as a percent of total salaries and related costs
27.6
23.9
23.7
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
Depreciation and amortization expenses were $880.4 million, $642.5 million and $648.7 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase in depreciation and amortization expenses from 2014 to 2015 principally resulted from an increased investment in real estate properties from the KTR acquisition in May 2015, the consolidation of NAIF in the fourth quarter of 2014, other acquired properties and completed developments. This is offset slightly by the disposition of properties. The decrease from 2013 to 2014 was principally a result of the disposition and contribution of properties, offset slightly by additional depreciation and amortization from completed development, acquired properties and the consolidation of NAIF in the fourth quarter of 2014.
Earnings from Unconsolidated Entities, Net
We recognized net earnings from unconsolidated entities that are accounted for under the equity method of $159.3 million, $134.3 million and $97.2 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The earnings we recognize are impacted by: (i) variances in revenues and expenses of each venture; (ii) the size and occupancy rate of the portfolio of properties owned by each venture; (iii) gains or losses from the dispositions of properties, when applicable; (iv) our ownership interest in each venture; and (v) fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates used to translate our share of net earnings to U.S. dollars, if applicable. See the discussion of our co-investment ventures above in the Strategic Capital segment discussion and in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a further breakdown of our share of net earnings recognized.
Interest Expense
Gross interest expense increased in 2015, compared with 2014, due to higher debt driven by the KTR acquisition offset somewhat by a decrease in interest rates and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. During 2015 and 2014, we issued new debt with lower borrowing costs and used the proceeds to invest in real estate and pay down or buy back our higher cost debt. Gross interest expense decreased in 2014, compared with 2013, due to lower average debt levels and decreased interest rates. Our weighted average effective interest rate was 3.3%, 4.2% and 4.7% for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a further breakdown of gross interest expense, amortization and capitalized amounts included in net interest expense. See also the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for further discussion of our debt and borrowing costs.
Gains on Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Net
We recognized gains of $758.9 million, $725.8 million and $597.7 million in continuing operations during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In 2015, the gains were driven primarily from dispositions to third parties in the U.S. In 2014, the gains were driven from third party dispositions mainly in the U.S., gains from the revaluation of our equity investment in NAIF upon acquisition of a controlling interest and contributions to our co-investment ventures in Mexico. In 2013, the gains were driven primarily from contributions to our co-investment ventures in Europe. We expect to continue to have contributions to co-investment ventures in the future, primarily in Europe, Japan and Mexico, as well as make dispositions of properties to third parties, primarily in the U.S., all depending on market conditions and other factors. We expect to use the proceeds from such contributions and dispositions to pay down the remaining balance of $400.0 million on the term loan that was used to finance a portion of the KTR acquisition and to fund our capital deployment activities in 2016. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the gains we recognized.
24
Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses) and Related Amortization, Net
To mitigate our foreign currency exchange exposure, we borrow in the functional currency of the borrowing entity when appropriate. However, we and certain of our foreign consolidated subsidiaries have intercompany or third-party debt that is not denominated in the entity’s functional currency. When the debt is remeasured against the functional currency of the entity, a gain or loss may result. To a lesser degree, we also have transactions with third parties of certain assets or liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than the entities’ functional currency. Certain of our third-party and intercompany debt is remeasured with the resulting adjustment recognized as a cumulative translation adjustment in Foreign Currency Translation Losses, Net in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. This treatment is applicable to third-party debt that is designated as a hedge of our net investment and intercompany debt that is deemed to be long-term in nature.
If the third-party debt is not designated as a hedge or the intercompany debt is deemed short-term in nature, we recognize a gain or loss in earnings when the debt is remeasured. We also recognized the change in fair value of derivative transactions not designated as hedges. To a lesser degree, we also have transactions with third parties of certain assets or liabilities that are denominated in a currency other than the entities’ functional currency.
The following table details our foreign currency and derivative gains (losses) and related amortization, net for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
Gains on the change in fair value and settlement of unhedged derivative transactions (1)
29.4
14.6
Gains (losses) on settlement and remeasurement of intercompany payables and debt (2)
(21.7
(5.6
10.5
Unrealized gains (losses) on embedded derivative, including amortization (3)
5.1
(27.7
(42.5
Gains (losses) on the settlement of transactions with third parties
(0.3
(1.6
Total foreign currency and derivative gains (losses) and related amortization, net
12.5
(17.8
(33.6
See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our derivative transactions.
These gains or losses were primarily related to the remeasurement of short-term intercompany loans between the U.S. parent and certain consolidated subsidiaries in Europe and Japan and result from fluctuations in the exchange rates of the U.S. dollar to the British pound sterling, euro and Japanese yen.
The embedded derivative instrument (exchange feature) was related to our exchangeable senior notes that matured March 15, 2015. There will be no impact to the financial statements going forward. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about the embedded derivative instrument related to our exchangeable senior notes.
Losses on Early Extinguishment of Debt, Net
We repurchased portions of several series of senior notes, senior exchangeable notes and secured mortgage debt, which resulted in the recognition of losses of $86.3 million, $165.3 million and $277.0 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As a result of these transactions, we have reduced our effective interest rate and lengthened the maturities of our debt. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding our debt repurchase.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
We recognize current income tax expense for income taxes incurred by our taxable REIT subsidiaries, state and local income taxes and taxes incurred in our foreign jurisdictions. Our current income tax expense fluctuates from period to period based primarily on the timing of our taxable income. Deferred income tax expense (benefit) is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences and the utilization of net operating losses generated in prior years that had been previously recognized as deferred income tax assets in taxable subsidiaries operating in the U.S. or in foreign jurisdictions.
The following table summarizes our income tax expense (benefit) for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
Current income tax expense (benefit):
Current income tax expense
24.9
15.6
Current income tax expense (benefit) on dispositions
(0.2
15.4
87.8
Current income tax expense on dispositions related to acquired tax liabilities
30.5
20.1
Total current income tax expense
28.2
61.5
126.2
Deferred income tax expense (benefit):
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
(56.7
Deferred income tax benefit on dispositions related to acquired tax liabilities
(3.5
(30.5
(20.1
Total deferred income tax benefit
(5.1
(87.2
(19.5
Total income tax expense (benefit)
23.1
(25.7
106.7
Our income taxes are discussed in more detail in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Discontinued Operations
As discussed above, we adopted a new accounting standard regarding discontinued operations effective January 1, 2014, and none of our property dispositions in 2015 or 2014 met the criteria to be classified as discontinued operations. In 2013, earnings from discontinued operations were $123.5 million. Discontinued operations under the previous standard represent the results of operations of properties that were sold to third parties along with the related gain on sale.
Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
This amount represents the third-party investors’ share of the earnings generated in consolidated entities in which we do not own 100% of the equity, reduced by the third party share of fees or promotes payable to us. In 2015, 2014 and 2013, we recognized net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests for Prologis, Inc. of $56.1 million, $103.1 million and $10.1 million, respectively. In 2015, this is primarily related to operating activity in our consolidated co-investment ventures, NAIF and USLV. USLV completed the KTR acquisition in May 2015, so approximately seven months of the operating activity were included, offset by third-party share of acquisition costs and an acquisition fee payable to us. We acquired a controlling interest in NAIF in the fourth quarter of 2014 and began consolidating the venture. In 2014, we recognized net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests in Prologis Mexico Fondo Logistico (“AFORES”) of $64.8 million because of the FIBRA
Prologis transaction, primarily related to the third-party investors’ share of the gain on disposition and the net deferred income tax benefit. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our consolidated co-investment ventures.
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) – Foreign Currency Translation Losses, Net
We recognize unrealized gains or losses related to the translation of our foreign subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars, along with realized and unrealized gains or losses associated with the changes in the fair value of derivative and nonderivative financial instruments that are designated and qualify as hedges of net investments in foreign operations.
During 2015, 2014 and 2013, we recorded net losses of $208.9 million, $171.4 million and $234.7 million, respectively. During 2015 and 2014, the unrealized losses were principally due to the weakening of the euro, British pound sterling, Japanese yen and Brazilian real to the U.S. dollar from the beginning of the period to the end of the period. In 2013, the unrealized losses included approximately $190.0 million of foreign currency translation losses on the properties contributed to PELP and NPR due to the weakening of the euro and Japanese yen, respectively, to the U.S. dollar from December 31, 2012, through the date of the contributions. Also in 2013, we recorded unrealized losses due to the weakening of the Japanese yen to the U.S. dollar, from the beginning of the period to the end of the period. See Note 16 in the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.
A majority of the properties we acquired were subjected to environmental reviews either by us or the previous owners. While some of these assessments have led to further investigation and sampling, none of the environmental assessments have revealed an environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. See Note 17 in the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information about environmental liabilities.
Overview
We consider our ability to generate cash from operating activities, distributions from our co-investment ventures, dispositions of properties and from available financing sources to be adequate to meet our anticipated future development, acquisition, operating, debt service, dividend and distribution requirements.
Near-Term Principal Cash Sources and Uses
In addition to dividends to the common and preferred stockholders of Prologis and distributions to the holders of limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership and our partners in the consolidated co-investment ventures, we expect our primary cash needs will consist of the following:
repayment of the balance on an unsecured senior term loan of $400.0 million that is scheduled to mature in 2016, however we are able to extend the maturity date by one year subject to certain conditions, if we so choose;
repayment of other debt and scheduled principal payments of $534.0 million in 2016;
completion of the development and leasing of the properties in our consolidated development portfolio (at December 31, 2015, 91 properties in our development portfolio were 39.3% leased with a current investment of $1.9 billion and a TEI of $2.9 billion when completed and leased, leaving $1.0 billion remaining to fund);
development of new properties for long-term investment, including the acquisition of land in certain markets;
capital expenditures and leasing costs on properties in our operating portfolio;
additional investments in current unconsolidated entities or new investments in future unconsolidated co-investment ventures;
acquisition of operating properties or portfolios of operating properties in global or regional markets (depending on market and other conditions) for direct, long-term investment in our consolidated portfolio (this might include acquisitions from our co-investment ventures); and
repurchase of our outstanding debt or equity securities (depending on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors) through cash purchases, open-market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers or otherwise.
We expect to fund our cash needs principally from the following sources, all subject to market conditions:
available unrestricted cash balances ($264.1 million at December 31, 2015);
property operations;
fees earned for services performed on behalf of the co-investment ventures, including promotes;
distributions received from the co-investment ventures;
proceeds from the disposition of properties, land parcels or other investments to third parties;
proceeds from the contributions of properties to current or future co-investment ventures;
proceeds from the sale of a portion of our investments in co-investment ventures (in December 2015, we submitted redemption requests for a portion of our investment in Prologis Targeted European Logistics Fund (“PTELF”) and USLF for €185.0 million ($201.4 million at December 31, 2015) and $200.0 million, respectively, which we expect to close in the second quarter of 2016 and bring our ownership percentages more in-line with our long-term targeted ownership;
borrowing capacity under our current credit facility arrangements discussed in the following section ($2.6 billion available at December 31, 2015), other facilities or borrowing arrangements; and
proceeds from the issuance of debt securities, including secured mortgage debt.
We may also generate proceeds from the issuance of equity securities, subject to market conditions.
Debt
The following table summarizes information about our debt at December 31 (in millions):
Debt outstanding
Weighted average interest rate
3.2
3.7
Weighted average maturity in months
As discussed earlier and in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we completed the KTR acquisition on May 29, 2015. To fund our share of the cash portion, approximately $2.6 billion, as well as our other net cash requirements, we borrowed $440.2 million under our credit facilities and entered into the following debt arrangements during the second quarter of 2015:
issued €700 million ($785.5 million) of senior notes with an interest rate of 1.4%, maturing in 2021;
entered into an unsecured senior term loan that matures in 2016 under which we originally drew $1.0 billion and has an outstanding balance of $400.0 million at December 31, 2015; and
entered into an unsecured senior term loan under which we can draw in Japanese yen in an aggregate amount not to exceed ¥65.0 billion that matures in 2022 (balance drawn was ¥65.0 billion ($539.9 million) at December 31, 2015).
We expect to repay the $400.0 million remaining balance on the senior term loan that was used to fund the KTR acquisition with proceeds generated from the contributions of certain development properties to our co-investment ventures in Europe, Japan and Mexico and proceeds generated from the disposition of certain nonstrategic properties to third parties.
In October 2015, we issued $750.0 million in principal amount of senior notes with an interest rate of 3.8% maturing in 2025. We used a portion of the net proceeds to repurchase approximately $512 million of our senior unsecured notes, including fees, with an average interest rate of 5.6% maturing in 2017 and 2018. We also commenced a tender offer through which we utilized a portion of the net proceeds to repurchase a portion of our senior notes that mature in 2019 and 2020 for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $289 million, including fees and accrued interest, which had an average interest rate of 7.0%. A portion of the remaining proceeds was used for other corporate purposes, including other debt repayment and repurchases.
In December 2015, we entered into an unsecured senior term loan under which we can draw in Canadian dollars in an aggregate amount not to exceed CAD $371.9 million ($267.9 million at December 31, 2015) that matures in 2023 (which was fully drawn at December 31, 2015). We used the proceeds to pay down our credit facilities and for general corporate purposes.
At December 31, 2015, we had credit facilities with an aggregate borrowing capacity of $2.6 billion, all of which was available for borrowing.
At December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants. These covenants include customary financial covenants for total debt, encumbered debt and fixed charge coverage ratios. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on our debt.
Equity Commitments Related to Certain Co-Investment Ventures
Certain co-investment ventures have equity commitments from us and our venture partners. Our venture partners fulfill their equity commitment with cash. We may fulfill our equity commitment through contributions of properties or cash. For more information on equity commitments for our unconsolidated co-investment ventures, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We have one consolidated co-investment venture, the Brazil Fund, with equity commitments at December 31, 2015, of $44.8 million, of which $22.4 million is our share and expires in December 2017. The equity commitments are denominated in Brazilian real and called and reported in U.S. dollars.
Cash Flow Summary
The following table summarizes our cash flow activity for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
Net cash provided by operating activities
963.4
704.5
485.0
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
(4,648.6
(488.3
2,333.9
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
3,608.2
(337.8
(2,365.6
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
In 2015 and 2014, cash provided by operating activities was more than the cash dividends paid on common and preferred stock by $158.7 million and $32.3 million, respectively. In 2013, cash provided by operating activities was less than the cash dividends paid on common and preferred stock by $88.9 million. In 2013, we had other sources of cash that we used, including proceeds from dispositions to third parties and contributions of real estate properties ($5.4 billion) and distributions from our co-investment ventures classified for a return of investment for reporting purposes ($411.9 million) both of which are included in investing activities. We used some of this cash to fund dividends not covered by cash provided by operating activities. As disclosed in Note 9 and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, we paid combined amounts for interest and income taxes of $370.0 million, $363.8 million and $526.0 million, respectively, in 2015, 2014 and 2013. In addition, our cash provided by operating activities, exclusive of changes in receivables and payables, is impacted by the following significant activity:
Real estate operations NOI. We receive the majority of our operating cash through our Real Estate Operations segment. NOI from this segment, less the noncash amount of straight-lined rent and amortization of above and below market leases, was $1.3 billion, $1.1 billion and $1.1 billion for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. See our Results of Operations section above for the key drivers of our real estate operations NOI.
Strategic capital NOI. We also generate operating cash through our Strategic Capital segment by providing management services to our unconsolidated co-investment ventures. NOI from this segment was $121.9 million, $123.4 million and $90.2 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. See our Results of Operations section above for the key drivers of our strategic capital NOI. Included in the NOI for 2015 is net promote income of $24.8 million that was earned as of December 31, 2015 but will be paid in the first quarter of 2016 and will be included in cash provided by operating activities at that time.
Distributions from unconsolidated entities. We received $144.0 million, $117.9 million and $68.3 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, of distributions from our unconsolidated entities as a return on our investment and representing our share of the net earnings in the ventures. Included in net earnings from our unconsolidated entities was our share of net non-cash expenses, totaling $169.3 million, $204.5 million and $156.4 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, primarily due to depreciation and amortization charges. We also received additional distributions from our unconsolidated co-investment ventures in excess of our share of net earnings that is reflected in Investing Activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
G&A. We incurred $184.5 million, $190.3 million and $180.0 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, of G&A costs, net of equity-based compensation expenses.
Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
Real estate development. We invested $1.3 billion, $1.1 billion and $853.1 million during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, in real estate development and leasing costs for first generation leases. We have 63 properties under development and 28 properties that were completed but not stabilized at December 31, 2015, and we expect to continue to develop new properties as the opportunities arise.
Real estate acquisitions. We acquired total real estate of $890.2 million, which included 1,051 acres of land and 52 operating properties, excluding the KTR acquisition in 2015. We acquired 1,055 acres of land and eight operating properties for a combined total of $612.3 million in 2014. In 2013, we acquired 536 acres of land and 26 operating properties for a combined total of $514.6 million, which includes properties acquired in connection with the wind-down of Prologis Japan Fund I.
KTR acquisition, net of cash received. In 2015, we acquired the real estate assets of KTR for a net cash purchase price of $4.8 billion through our consolidated co-investment venture USLV, of which we own 55%. Our partner in USLV contributed their share which is discussed below in Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities – Noncontrolling interests contributions. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on the transaction.
Capital expenditures. We invested $237.9 million, $212.6 million and $228.0 million in our operating properties during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which included recurring capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions on existing operating properties that were previously leased.
Proceeds from dispositions and contributions. We generated cash from dispositions and contributions of real estate properties of $2.8 billion, $2.3 billion and $5.4 billion in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The following table summarizes the number of properties we disposed of and contributed for the years ended December 31:
2014 (1)
2013 (2)
Third party dispositions
136
89
Contributions to unconsolidated co-investment ventures
31
126
254
We contributed 115 real estate properties owned on a consolidated basis to FIBRA Prologis and received cash proceeds of $390.6 million, primarily attributable to the third-party investors in AFORES and subsequently distributed the proceeds to them.
The activity in 2013 primarily included the contribution of real estate properties to our co-investment ventures, PELP and NPR of $1.3 billion and $1.9 billion, respectively.
Purchase of a controlling interest. We paid net cash of $590.4 million to acquire a controlling interest in NAIF in 2014. We paid net cash of $678.6 million to acquire our partners’ interest in Prologis North American Industrial Fund III and Prologis SGP Mexico in 2013.
Investments in and advances to. We invested cash of $474.4 million, $739.6 million and $1.2 billion during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, in our unconsolidated co-investment ventures and other ventures, net of repayment of advances. Our investments represented our proportionate share and the ventures used the funds for the acquisition of operating properties, development and repayment of debt. The following table summarizes our significant investments in our unconsolidated co-investment ventures for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
222.5
461.2
162.3
90.7
72.9
210.2
Prologis Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I and related joint ventures
56.7
66.3
111.5
53.1
167.2
56.6
411.5
104.8
See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on our unconsolidated co-investment ventures.
Return of investment. As discussed above, we receive distributions from our unconsolidated co-investment ventures from operations representing our share of the net earnings recognized that are reflected in Operating Activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Any distribution that we receive in excess of our share of net earnings is reflected as a return of investment in Investing Activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. We received distributions from unconsolidated co-investment ventures and other ventures as a return of investment of $170.0 million, $244.3 million and $411.9 million during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Included in these amounts are distributions in excess of our share of net earnings of $133.4 million, $172.1 million and $103.3 million for
28
2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, from additional operating cash flows primarily related to our share of non-cash expenses. We also received $106.3 million in connection with the wind down of Prologis Japan Fund I in 2013.
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable. In 2014, we received $188.0 million for the payment in full of the notes receivable backed by real estate that originated in 2010 through the sale of a portfolio of industrial properties.
Settlement of net investment hedges. We received net proceeds of $128.2 million, $13.0 million and $7.8 million from the settlement of our net investment hedges during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our derivative activity.
Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
Proceeds from issuance of common stock.
We generated net proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our incentive plans, primarily from the exercise of stock options, of $18.2 million, $25.8 million and $22.4 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
We generated net proceeds of $71.5 million and $140.1 million from the issuance of 1.7 million shares and 3.3 million shares of common stock under our at-the-market program during 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Norges Bank Investment Management exercised a warrant (that we issued in connection with the formation of PELP) for $213.8 million in exchange for six million shares of Prologis common stock in 2014. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail.
We received net proceeds of $1.4 billion from the issuance of 35.65 million shares of common stock in 2013.
Dividends paid on common and preferred stock. We paid dividends of $804.7 million, $672.2 million and $573.9 million to our common and preferred stockholders during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Repurchase and redemption of preferred stock and units. We paid $27.6 million to repurchase shares of series Q preferred stock in 2014. We paid $482.5 million to redeem all of the outstanding shares of series L, M, O, P, R and S preferred stock in 2013.
Noncontrolling interests contributions. Our partners in consolidated co-investment ventures made contributions of $2.4 billion, $468.3 million and $145.5 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our partner in USLV made contributions in 2015 of $2.4 billion, primarily for the KTR acquisition, and $446.1 million in 2014 related to the formation of the venture. Contributions from noncontrolling interest partners were primarily for the purchase of real estate properties by AFORES and development within Brazil Fund and related joint ventures in 2013.
Noncontrolling interests distributions. Our consolidated ventures distributed $215.7 million, $315.4 million and $116.0 million to various noncontrolling interests in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Distributions in 2015 include $120.5 million that were primarily related to distributions to our partners in USLV and NAIF as a result of proceeds from the disposition of real estate. The distributions in 2014 were principally related to a cash distribution of $249.9 million to our partners in AFORES due to buildings contributed to FIBRA Prologis and a cash distribution of $28.6 million to our partners in Prologis AMS due to the disposition of the remaining properties of the venture.
Purchase of noncontrolling interests. We purchased our partner’s interest in Prologis Alliance Fund II, a consolidated co-investment venture, for $245.8 million in 2013.
Net payments on credit facilities. We made net payments of $8.0 million, $717.4 million and $93.1 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013 respectively, on our credit facilities.
Repurchase and payments of debt. We made payments of $1.0 billion on our outstanding term loans, $127.8 million on regularly scheduled debt principal payments and payments at maturity and repurchased and extinguished secured mortgage debt of $2.0 billion during 2015. We made payments of $2.2 billion on our previous term loan, $101.8 million on regularly scheduled debt principal payments and payments at maturity and repurchased and extinguished exchangeable senior notes and secured mortgage debt of $1.9 billion during 2014. We repurchased and extinguished exchangeable senior notes, secured mortgage debt, senior term loans and other debt of consolidated entities and made regularly scheduled debt principal payments and payments at maturity for a combined total of $6.0 billion during 2013.
Proceeds from issuance of debt. We issued $1.5 billion of senior notes, $565.0 million of secured mortgage debt and $3.1 billion of term loans and used the net proceeds to fund our share of the purchase price for the KTR acquisition, repurchased and redeemed senior notes (see above for further explanation) in 2015 and for general corporate purposes. We issued €1.8 billion ($2.4 billion) of senior notes, $2.3 billion of term loans and $70.7 million of secured debt in 2014. We issued senior notes, secured mortgage debt, term loan debt and other debt of $3.6 billion in 2013. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our debt issuance activity.
29
Unconsolidated Co-Investment Venture Debt
We had investments in and advances to our unconsolidated co-investment ventures, at December 31, 2015, of $4.6 billion. These ventures had total third-party debt of $6.2 billion (of which $1.8 billion was our proportionate share) at December 31, 2015. This debt is primarily secured, is non-recourse to Prologis or the other investors in the co-investment ventures and matures as follows (dollars in millions):
Weighted
There-
Disc/
Average
Prologis’ Share
after
Prem
Interest Rate
138.0
19.4
449.0
822.4
4.2
1,433.0
322.9
22.5
107.5
216.4
72.5
250.0
657.3
4.8
301.5
45.9
7.5
80.9
562.7
(5.5
652.8
271.6
41.6
60.6
327.8
1,374.9
(15.2
1,888.0
3.4
591.1
98.9
0.1
99.0
5.0
49.5
50.0
193.5
16.6
246.7
890.4
(8.0
1,339.2
202.2
15.1
89.6
(5.2
180.7
3.9
27.1
15.0
685.0
320.5
1,266.5
3,996.7
(18.7
6,250.0
1,765.9
At December 31, 2015, we did not guarantee any third-party debt of the co-investment ventures. In our role as the manager, we work with the co-investment ventures to refinance their maturing debt. There can be no assurance that the co-investment ventures will be able to refinance any maturing indebtedness on terms as favorable as the maturing debt, or at all. If the ventures are unable to refinance the maturing indebtedness with newly issued debt, they may be able to obtain funds by voluntary capital contributions from us and our partners or by selling assets. Certain of our ventures also have credit facilities, or unencumbered properties, both of which may be used to obtain funds.
Long-Term Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations at December 31, 2015 (in millions):
Payments Due by Period
Less than 1 Year
1 to 3 Years
3 to 5 Years
More than 5 Years
Debt obligations, other than credit facilities
934
1,833
2,175
6,679
11,621
Interest on debt obligations, other than credit facilities
377
653
490
554
2,074
Unfunded commitments on the development portfolio (1)
877
Operating lease payments
49
221
359
2,198
2,565
2,714
7,454
14,931
We had properties in our consolidated development portfolio (completed and under development) at December 31, 2015, with a TEI of $2.9 billion. The unfunded commitments presented include not only those costs that we are obligated to fund under construction contracts, but all costs necessary to place the property into service, including the estimated costs of tenant improvements, marketing and leasing costs that we will incur as the property is leased.
Distribution and Dividend Requirements
Our dividend policy on our common stock is to distribute a percentage of our cash flow to ensure that we will meet the dividend requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, relative to maintaining our REIT status, while still allowing us to retain cash to meet other needs such as capital improvements and other investment activities.
In 2015, we paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.36 for the first two quarters of 2015 and $0.40 per common share for the last two quarters of 2015. In the fourth quarter of 2015, we issued a new class of common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership that are entitled to a quarterly distribution equal to $0.64665 per unit so long as the common units receive a quarterly distribution of at least $0.40 per unit (see Note 11 in the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on this new partnership unit). We paid a dividend of $0.64665 in December 2015 related to this new partnership unit. We paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.33 per common share for all four quarters of 2014. Our future common stock dividends, if and as declared, may vary and will be determined by the Board upon the circumstances prevailing at the time, including our financial condition, operating results and REIT distribution requirements, and may be adjusted at the discretion of the Board during the year.
At December 31, 2015, we had one series of preferred stock outstanding – the “Series Q preferred stock.” The annual dividend rate is 8.54% per share and dividends are payable quarterly in arrears.
Pursuant to the terms of our preferred stock, we are restricted from declaring or paying any dividend with respect to our common stock unless and until all cumulative dividends with respect to the preferred stock have been paid and sufficient funds have been set aside for dividends that have been declared for the relevant dividend period with respect to the preferred stock.
Other Commitments
On a continuing basis, we are engaged in various stages of negotiations for the acquisition or disposition of individual properties or portfolios of properties.
A critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the portrayal of an entity’s financial condition and results of operations and requires judgment on the part of management. Generally, the judgment requires management to make estimates and assumptions about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates are prepared using management’s best judgment, after considering past and current economic conditions and expectations for the future. Changes in estimates could affect our financial position and specific items in our results of operations that are used by stockholders, potential investors, industry analysts and lenders in their evaluation of
our performance. Of the accounting policies discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, those presented below have been identified by us as critical accounting policies.
Consolidation
We consolidate all entities that are wholly owned and those in which we own less than 100% of the equity but control, as well as any variable interest entities in which we are the primary beneficiary. We evaluate our ability to control an entity including whether the entity is a variable interest entity and whether we are the primary beneficiary. We consider the substantive terms of the arrangement to identify which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. Investments in entities that we do not control but over which we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for using the equity method. Our ability to correctly assess our influence or control over an entity affects the presentation of these investments in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Business Combinations
Upon acquisition of real estate that constitutes a business, which includes acquiring a controlling interest in an entity previously accounted for using the equity method of accounting, we allocate the purchase price to the various components of the acquisition based on the fair value of each component. The components typically include land, building, intangible assets related to the acquired leases, debt, deferred tax liability and other assumed assets and liabilities in the case of an acquisition of a business. In an acquisition of multiple properties, we must also allocate the purchase price among the properties. The allocation of the purchase price is based on our assessment of estimated fair value and often is based on the expected future cash flows of the property and various characteristics of the markets where the property is located. The fair value may also include an enterprise value premium that we estimate a third party would be willing to pay for a portfolio of properties. In the case of an acquisition of a controlling interest in an entity previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting, this allocation may result in a gain or a loss. The initial allocation of the purchase price is based on management’s preliminary assessment, which may differ when final information becomes available. Subsequent adjustments made to the initial purchase price allocation are made within the allocation period, not to exceed one year. The use of different assumptions in the allocation of the purchase price of the acquired properties and liabilities assumed could affect the timing of recognition of the related revenue and expenses.
Revenue Recognition – Gains (Losses) on Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Strategic Capital Revenue
We recognize gains from the contributions and sales of real estate assets, generally at the time the title is transferred, consideration is received and we no longer have substantial continuing involvement with the real estate sold. In many of our transactions, an entity in which we have an equity investment will acquire a real estate asset from us. We make judgments based on the specific terms of each transaction as to the amount of the total profit from the transaction that we recognize given our continuing ownership interest and our level of future involvement with the entity that acquires the assets. In addition, we make judgments regarding recognition in earnings of certain fees and incentives earned for services provided to these entities based on when they are earned, fixed and determinable.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivative financial instruments can be designated as fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Accounting for derivatives as hedges requires that at inception, and over the term of the instruments, the hedged item and derivative qualify for hedge accounting. The rules and interpretations for derivatives are complex. Failure to apply this guidance correctly may result in all changes in fair value of the hedged derivative being recognized in earnings.
We assess both at inception, and at least quarterly thereafter, whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are effective at offsetting changes in either the fair values or cash flows of the related underlying exposures. Any ineffective portion of a derivative financial instrument's change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. Derivatives not designated as hedges are used to manage our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations and variable interest rates but do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about our derivative financial instrument policy.
Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements, significant management judgment is required to estimate our income tax liability for each taxable entity, the liability associated with open tax years that are under review, our REIT taxable income and our compliance with REIT requirements. Our estimates are based on interpretation of tax laws. We estimate our actual current income tax due and assess temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for book and tax purposes resulting in the recognition of deferred income tax assets and liabilities. These estimates may have an impact on the income tax expense recognized. Adjustments may be required by a change in assessment of our deferred income tax assets and liabilities; changes in assessments of the recognition of income tax benefits for certain nonroutine transactions; changes due to audit adjustments by federal, international and state tax authorities; our inability to qualify as a REIT; the potential for built-in gain recognition; changes in the assessment of properties to be contributed to taxable REIT subsidiaries and changes in tax laws. Adjustments required in any given period are included within income tax expense. We recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities.
Other than Temporary Impairment of Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
When circumstances indicate the value of an equity investment may be reduced, we evaluate whether the loss in value is other than temporary. If we determine that a loss in value is other than temporary, we recognize an impairment charge to reflect the investment at fair value. The use of projected future cash flows and other estimates of fair value, the determination of when a loss is other than temporary and the calculation of the amount of the loss is complex and subjective. Use of other estimates and assumptions may result in different conclusions. Changes in economic and operating conditions, as well as changes in our intent with regard to our investment that occur subsequent to our review, could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment charges of our equity investments.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We assess the carrying values of our respective long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable.
Recoverability of real estate assets is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. To review our real estate assets for recoverability, we consider current market conditions, as well as our intent with respect to holding or disposing of the asset. Our intent with regard to the underlying assets might change as market conditions change. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow models, applying a capitalization rate to estimated NOI of a property, quoted market values and third-party appraisals, where considered necessary. The use of projected future cash flows is based on assumptions that are consistent with our estimates of future expectations and the strategic plan we use to manage our underlying business. If our analysis indicates that the carrying value of a real estate property that we expect to hold is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, we recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the current estimated fair value of the real estate property. Assumptions and estimates used in
the recoverability analyses for future cash flows, discount rates and capitalization rates are complex and subjective. Changes in economic and operating conditions or our intent with regard to our investment that occurs subsequent to our impairment analyses could impact these assumptions and result in future impairment of our long-lived assets.
Capitalization of Costs
We capitalize costs incurred in developing, renovating, rehabilitating and improving real estate assets as part of the investment basis. Costs incurred in making repairs and maintaining real estate assets are expensed as incurred. During the land development and construction periods, we capitalize interest costs, insurance, real estate taxes and certain general and administrative costs of the personnel performing development, renovations and rehabilitation if such costs are incremental and identifiable to a specific activity to get the asset ready for its intended use. Capitalized costs are included in the investment basis of real estate assets.
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
FFO is a financial measure that is not determined in accordance with GAAP, but is a measure that is commonly used in the real estate industry. The most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO is net earnings. Although the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) has published a definition of FFO, modifications to the NAREIT calculation of FFO are common among REITs, as companies seek to provide financial measures that meaningfully reflect their business.
FFO is not meant to represent a comprehensive system of financial reporting and does not present, nor do we intend it to present, a complete picture of our financial condition and operating performance. We believe that FFO is only meaningful when it is used in conjunction with net earnings computed under GAAP. Furthermore, we believe our consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP, provide the most meaningful picture of our financial condition.
NAREIT’s FFO measure adjusts net earnings computed under GAAP to exclude historical cost depreciation and gains and losses from the sales, along with impairment charges, of previously depreciated properties. We agree that these NAREIT adjustments are useful to investors for the following reasons:
historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP assumes, through depreciation charges, that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. NAREIT stated in its White Paper on FFO “since real estate asset values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors have considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient by themselves.” Consequently, NAREIT’s definition of FFO reflects the fact that real estate, as an asset class, generally appreciates over time and depreciation charges required by GAAP do not reflect the underlying economic realities. We exclude depreciation from our unconsolidated entities and the third parties’ share of our consolidated ventures.
REITs were created in order to encourage public ownership of real estate as an asset class through investment in firms that were in the business of long-term ownership and management of real estate. The exclusion, in NAREIT’s definition of FFO, of gains and losses from the sales, along with impairment charges, of previously depreciated operating real estate assets allows investors and analysts to readily identify the operating results of the long-term assets that form the core of a REIT’s activity and assists in comparing those operating results between periods. We include the gains and losses (including impairment charges) from dispositions of land and development properties, as well as our proportionate share of the gains and losses (including impairment charges) from dispositions of development properties recognized by our unconsolidated and consolidated entities, in our definition of FFO. We exclude the gain on revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest from our definition of FFO.
Our FFO Measures
At the same time that NAREIT created and defined its FFO measure for the REIT industry, it also recognized that “management of each of its member companies has the responsibility and authority to publish financial information that it regards as useful to the financial community.” We believe stockholders, potential investors and financial analysts who review our operating results are best served by a defined FFO measure that includes other adjustments to net earnings computed under GAAP in addition to those included in the NAREIT defined measure of FFO. Our FFO measures are used by management in analyzing our business and the performance of our properties and we believe that it is important that stockholders, potential investors and financial analysts understand the measures management uses.
We calculate our FFO measures, as defined below, based on our proportionate ownership share of both our unconsolidated and consolidated ventures. We reflect our share of our FFO measures for unconsolidated ventures by applying our average ownership percentage for the period to the applicable reconciling items on an entity by entity basis. We reflect our share for consolidated ventures in which we do not own 100% of the equity by adjusting our FFO measures to remove the third party ownership share of the applicable reconciling items based on average ownership percentage for the applicable periods.
We use these FFO measures, including by segment and region, to: (i) evaluate our performance and the performance of our properties in comparison with expected results and results of previous periods, relative to resource allocation decisions; (ii) evaluate the performance of our management; (iii) budget and forecast future results to assist in the allocation of resources; (iv) assess our performance as compared with similar real estate companies and the industry in general; and (v) evaluate how a specific potential investment will impact our future results. Because we make decisions with regard to our performance with a long-term outlook, we believe it is appropriate to remove the effects of short-term items that we do not expect to affect the underlying long-term performance of the properties. The long-term performance of our properties is principally driven by rental revenue. While not infrequent or unusual, these additional items we exclude in calculating FFO, as defined by Prologis, defined below, are subject to significant fluctuations from period to period that cause both positive and negative short-term effects on our results of operations in inconsistent and unpredictable directions that are not relevant to our long-term outlook.
We use our FFO measures as supplemental financial measures of operating performance. We do not use our FFO measures as, nor should they be considered to be, alternatives to net earnings computed under GAAP, as indicators of our operating performance, as alternatives to cash from operating activities computed under GAAP or as indicators of our ability to fund our cash needs.
FFO, as defined by Prologis attributable to common stockholders and unitholders (“FFO, as defined by Prologis”)
To arrive at FFO, as defined by Prologis, we adjust the NAREIT defined FFO measure to exclude:
deferred income tax benefits and deferred income tax expenses recognized by our subsidiaries;
current income tax expense related to acquired tax liabilities that were recorded as deferred tax liabilities in an acquisition, to the extent the expense is offset with a deferred income tax benefit in GAAP earnings that is excluded from our defined FFO measure;
unhedged foreign currency exchange gains and losses resulting from debt transactions between us and our foreign consolidated subsidiaries and our foreign unconsolidated entities;
foreign currency exchange gains and losses from the remeasurement (based on current foreign currency exchange rates) of certain third-party debt of our foreign consolidated subsidiaries and our foreign unconsolidated entities; and
mark-to-market adjustments and related amortization of debt discounts associated with derivative financial instruments.
We believe investors are best served if the information that is made available to them allows them to align their analysis and evaluation of our operating results along the same lines that our management uses in planning and executing our business strategy.
Core FFO attributable to common stockholders and unitholders (“Core FFO”)
In addition to FFO, as defined by Prologis, we also use Core FFO. To arrive at Core FFO, we adjust FFO, as defined by Prologis, to exclude the following recurring and nonrecurring items that we recognized directly in FFO, as defined by Prologis:
gains or losses from contribution or sale of land or development properties;
income tax expense related to the sale of investments in real estate and third-party acquisition costs related to the acquisition of real estate;
impairment charges recognized related to our investments in real estate generally as a result of our change in intent to contribute or sell these properties;
gains or losses from the early extinguishment of debt and redemption and repurchase of preferred stock; and
expenses related to natural disasters.
We believe it is appropriate to further adjust our FFO, as defined by Prologis for certain recurring items as they were driven by transactional activity and factors relating to the financial and real estate markets, rather than factors specific to the on-going operating performance of our properties or investments. The impairment charges we have recognized were primarily based on valuations of real estate, which had declined due to market conditions, that we no longer expected to hold for long-term investment. Over the last few years, we made it a priority to strengthen our financial position by reducing our debt, our investment in certain low yielding assets and our exposure to foreign currency exchange fluctuations. As a result, we changed our intent to sell or contribute certain of our real estate properties and recorded impairment charges when we did not expect to recover the costs of our investment. Also, we purchased portions of our debt securities when we believed it was advantageous to do so, which was based on market conditions, and in an effort to lower our borrowing costs and extend our debt maturities. As a result, we have recognized net gains or losses on the early extinguishment of certain debt due to the financial market conditions at that time.
We analyze our operating performance primarily by the rental revenue of our real estate and the revenue driven by our strategic capital business, net of operating, administrative and financing expenses. This income stream is not directly impacted by fluctuations in the market value of our investments in real estate or debt securities. Although these items discussed above have had a material impact on our operations and are reflected in our financial statements, the removal of the effects of these items allows us to better understand the core operating performance of our properties over the long term.
We use Core FFO, including by segment and region, to: (i) evaluate our performance and the performance of our properties in comparison to expected results and results of previous periods, relative to resource allocation decisions; (ii) evaluate the performance of our management; (iii) budget and forecast future results to assist in the allocation of resources; (iv) provide guidance to the financial markets to understand our expected operating performance; (v) assess our operating performance as compared to similar real estate companies and the industry in general; and (vi) evaluate how a specific potential investment will impact our future results. Because we make decisions with regard to our performance with a long-term outlook, we believe it is appropriate to remove the effects of items that we do not expect to affect the underlying long-term performance of the properties we own. As noted above, we believe the long-term performance of our properties is principally driven by rental revenue. We believe investors are best served if the information that is made available to them allows them to align their analysis and evaluation of our operating results along the same lines that our management uses in planning and executing our business strategy.
Limitations on the use of our FFO measures
While we believe our defined FFO measures are important supplemental measures, neither NAREIT’s nor our measures of FFO should be used alone because they exclude significant economic components of net earnings computed under GAAP and are, therefore, limited as an analytical tool. Accordingly, these are only a few of the many measures we use when analyzing our business. Some of these limitations are:
The current income tax expenses and acquisition costs that are excluded from our defined FFO measures represent the taxes and transaction costs that are payable.
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets are economic costs that are excluded from FFO. FFO is limited, as it does not reflect the cash requirements that may be necessary for future replacements of the real estate assets. Furthermore, the amortization of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of industrial properties are not reflected in FFO.
Gains or losses from non-development property acquisitions and dispositions or impairment charges related to expected dispositions represent changes in value of the properties. By excluding these gains and losses, FFO does not capture realized changes in the value of acquired or disposed properties arising from changes in market conditions.
The deferred income tax benefits and expenses that are excluded from our defined FFO measures result from the creation of a deferred income tax asset or liability that may have to be settled at some future point. Our defined FFO measures do not currently reflect any income or expense that may result from such settlement.
The foreign currency exchange gains and losses that are excluded from our defined FFO measures are generally recognized based on movements in foreign currency exchange rates through a specific point in time. The ultimate settlement of our foreign currency-denominated net assets is indefinite as to timing and amount. Our FFO measures are limited in that they do not reflect the current period changes in these net assets that result from periodic foreign currency exchange rate movements.
The gains and losses on extinguishment of debt that we exclude from our Core FFO, may provide a benefit or cost to us as we may be settling our debt at less or more than our future obligation.
The natural disaster expenses that we exclude from Core FFO are costs that we have incurred.
We compensate for these limitations by using our FFO measures only in conjunction with net earnings computed under GAAP when making our decisions. This information should be read with our complete consolidated financial statements prepared under GAAP. To assist investors in compensating for these limitations, we reconcile our defined FFO measures to our net earnings computed under GAAP for the years ended December 31 as follows (in millions):
FFO
Reconciliation of net earnings to FFO measures:
Net earnings attributable to common stockholders
862.8
622.2
315.4
Add (deduct) NAREIT defined adjustments:
Real estate related depreciation and amortization
854.5
617.8
624.6
Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate properties, net
(500.8
(553.2
(271.3
Reconciling items related to noncontrolling interests
(78.1
47.9
(9.0
Our share of reconciling items included in earnings from unconsolidated entities
185.6
186.5
159.8
Subtotal – NAREIT defined FFO
1,324.0
921.2
819.5
Add (deduct) our defined adjustments:
Unrealized foreign currency and derivative losses (gains) and related amortization, net
19.0
32.8
Deferred income tax expense (benefit), net
(20.0
Current income tax expense related to acquired tax liabilities
(1.3
(13.6
2.2
FFO, as defined by Prologis
1,308.5
887.5
855.2
Adjustments to arrive at Core FFO:
Gains on dispositions of development properties and land, net
(258.1
(172.4
(427.6
Acquisition expenses
47.0
3.0
Losses on early extinguishment of debt and repurchase of preferred stock, net
86.3
171.8
286.1
(11.1
46.6
8.7
Core FFO
1,181.3
953.1
813.2
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to the impact of foreign-exchange related variability and earnings volatility on our foreign investments and interest rate changes. See our risk factors in Item 1A. Risk Factors, specifically the following: The depreciation in the value of the foreign currency in countries where we have a significant investment may adversely affect our results of operations and financial position and We may be unable to refinance our debt or our cash flow may be insufficient to make required debt payments. See also Notes 2 and 16 in the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for more information about our foreign operations and derivative financial instruments.
We monitor our market risk exposures using a sensitivity analysis. Our sensitivity analysis estimates the exposure to market risk sensitive instruments assuming a hypothetical 10% adverse change in exchange or interest rates at December 31, 2015. The results of the sensitivity analysis are summarized in the following sections. The sensitivity analysis is of limited predictive value. As a result, revenues and expenses, as well as our ultimate realized gains or losses with respect to interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during a future period, hedging strategies at the time and the prevailing interest and foreign currency exchange rates.
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to foreign exchange-related variability and earnings volatility on our foreign investments. Foreign currency market risk is the possibility that our financial results or financial position could be better or worse than planned because of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. At December 31, 2015, we had net equity of approximately $1.6 billion, or 8.5% of total net equity, denominated in a currency other than the U.S. dollar, after consideration of our derivative and nonderivative financial instruments. Based on our sensitivity analysis, a 10% reduction in exchange rates would cause a reduction of $162.1 million to our net equity.
At December 31, 2015, we had foreign currency forward contracts, which were designated and qualify as net investment hedges, with an aggregate notional amount of $386.1 million to hedge a portion of our investments in the United Kingdom. We also have foreign currency forward contracts, which were designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, with an aggregate notional amount of $4.8 million to hedge cash payments for development in Mexico. On the basis of our sensitivity analysis, a weakening of the U.S. dollar against the British pound sterling or Mexican peso by 10% would result in a $39.1 million negative change in our cash flows on settlement. In addition, we also have British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, euro and Japanese yen forward and option contracts, which were not designated as hedges, and have an aggregate notional amount of $611.7 million to mitigate risk associated with the translation of the projected financial results of our subsidiaries in Europe, Canada and Japan. A weakening of the U.S. dollar against these currencies by 10% would result in a $61.2 million negative change in our net income on settlement.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes on future earnings and cash flows. At December 31, 2015, we had $2.4 billion of variable rate debt outstanding, of which $2.1 billion was outstanding on our term loans and $298.7 million was outstanding on secured mortgage debt. We had no outstanding balances on our credit facilities. At December 31, 2015, we had entered into interest rate swap agreements to fix $1.1 billion of our Japanese yen term loans (¥105.9 billion) and our Canadian term loan (CAD $371.9 million). During the year ended December 31, 2015, we had weighted average daily outstanding borrowings of $257.3 million on our variable rate credit facilities. On the basis of our sensitivity analysis, a 10% adverse change in interest rates based on our average outstanding variable rate debt balances not subject to interest rate swap agreements during the period would result in additional interest expense of $2.9 million, which equates to a change in interest rates of 20 basis points.
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The Consolidated Balance Sheets of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P. at December 31, 2015, and 2014, the Consolidated Statements of Income of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P., the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P., the Consolidated Statements of Equity of Prologis, Inc., the Consolidated Statements of Capital of Prologis, L.P. and the Consolidated Statements Cash Flows of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P. for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, together with the reports of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, are included under Item 15 of this report and are incorporated herein by reference. Selected unaudited quarterly financial data are presented in Note 20 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
Controls and Procedures (The Parent)
Prologis, Inc. carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) at December 31, 2015. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, there were no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2015, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting was conducted at December 31, 2015, based on the criteria described in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management determined that, at December 31, 2015, the internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2015, has been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report which is included herein.
Limitations of the Effectiveness of Controls
Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting. The internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with United States GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Controls and Procedures (The Operating Partnership)
Prologis, L.P. carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) at December 31, 2015. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms. Subsequent to December 31, 2015, there were no significant changes in the internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of the internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting. The internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
ITEM 9B. Other Information
ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the descriptions under the captions “Election of Directors — Nominees,” Information Relating to Stockholders, Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers — Certain Information with Respect to Executive Officers, “Additional Information — Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Corporate Governance ” and “Board of Directors” in our 2016 Proxy Statement or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the descriptions under the captions “Executive Compensation Matters” and “Board of Directors and Committees” in our 2016 Proxy Statement or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the descriptions under the captions “Information Relating to Stockholders, Directors, Nominees, and Executive Officers — Security Ownership” and “Equity Compensation Plans” in our 2016 Proxy Statement or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the descriptions under the captions “Information Relating to Stockholders, Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers — Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Corporate Governance” in our 2016 Proxy Statement or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the description under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our 2016 Proxy Statement or will be provided in an amendment filed on Form 10-K/A.
ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules
The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules:
1. Financial Statements:
See Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule III on page 84 of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
2. Financial Statement Schedules:
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes or is not applicable.
(b) Exhibits: The Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Index to the Exhibits on pages 100 to 104 of this report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
(c) Financial Statements: See Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedule III on page 84 of this report, which is incorporated by reference.
INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE III
Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P.:
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
38
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Equity
44
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Capital
50
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
51
82
84
37
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Prologis, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Prologis, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for discontinued operations as of January 1, 2014, on a prospective basis, due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2014-08.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Prologis, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 19, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Prologis, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Denver, Colorado
February 19, 2016
The Partners
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, L.P. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Prologis, L.P.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Prologis, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have audited Prologis, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Prologis, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Prologis, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Prologis, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015, and our report dated February 19, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
40
PROLOGIS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)
ASSETS
Investments in real estate properties
22,190,145
Less accumulated depreciation
3,274,284
2,790,781
Net investments in real estate properties
24,247,084
19,399,364
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities
4,755,620
4,824,724
Assets held for sale or contribution
378,423
43,934
Notes receivable backed by real estate
235,050
Net investments in real estate
29,616,177
24,268,022
Cash and cash equivalents
264,080
350,692
Other assets
1,514,510
1,156,287
31,394,767
25,775,001
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
11,626,831
9,336,977
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
712,725
627,999
Other liabilities
634,375
626,426
Total liabilities
12,973,931
10,591,402
Equity:
Prologis, Inc. stockholders’ equity:
Series Q preferred stock at stated liquidation preference of $50 per share; $0.01 par value; 1,565 shares issued and
outstanding and 100,000 preferred shares authorized at December 31, 2015, and 2014
78,235
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 524,512 shares and 509,498 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2015, and 2014, respectively
5,245
5,095
Additional paid-in capital
19,302,367
18,467,009
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(791,429
(600,337
Distributions in excess of net earnings
(3,926,483
(3,974,493
Total Prologis, Inc. stockholders’ equity
14,667,935
13,975,509
Noncontrolling interests
3,752,901
1,208,090
Total equity
18,420,836
15,183,599
Total liabilities and equity
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues:
Rental
1,536,117
1,178,609
1,227,975
437,070
348,740
331,518
Strategic capital
210,362
219,871
179,472
Development management and other
13,525
13,567
11,521
2,197,074
1,760,787
1,750,486
Expenses:
543,214
430,787
451,938
88,418
96,496
89,279
General and administrative
238,199
247,768
229,207
Depreciation and amortization
880,373
642,461
648,668
Other
66,698
23,467
26,982
Total expenses
1,816,902
1,440,979
1,446,074
Operating income
380,172
319,808
304,412
Other income (expense):
Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net
159,262
134,288
97,220
Interest expense
(301,363
(308,885
(379,327
Interest and other income, net
25,484
25,768
26,948
Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation of equity investments upon
acquisition of a controlling interest, net
758,887
725,790
597,656
Foreign currency and derivative gains (losses) and related amortization, net
12,466
(17,841
(33,633
Losses on early extinguishment of debt, net
(86,303
(165,300
(277,014
Total other income
568,433
393,820
31,850
Earnings before income taxes
948,605
713,628
336,262
23,090
(25,656
106,733
Earnings from continuing operations
925,515
739,284
229,529
Discontinued operations:
Income attributable to disposed properties and assets held for sale
6,970
Net gains on dispositions, including taxes
116,550
Total discontinued operations
123,520
Consolidated net earnings
353,049
Less net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
56,076
103,101
10,128
Net earnings attributable to controlling interests
869,439
636,183
342,921
Less preferred stock dividends
6,651
7,431
18,391
Loss on preferred stock redemption/repurchase
6,517
9,108
862,788
622,235
315,422
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic
521,241
499,583
486,076
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted
533,944
506,391
491,546
Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders – Basic:
Discontinued operations
Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders – Basic
Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders – Diluted:
Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders – Diluted
Dividends per common share
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation losses, net
(208,901
(171,401
(234,680
Unrealized gains (losses) and amortization on derivative contracts, net
(17,457
(6,498
19,590
Comprehensive income
699,157
561,385
137,959
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
(56,076
(103,101
(10,128
Other comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
35,266
13,237
12,978
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders
678,347
471,521
140,809
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Common Stock
Accumulated
Distributions
Number
Additional
in Excess of
Non-
Preferred
of
Par
Paid-in
Comprehensive
Net
controlling
Stock
Shares
Value
Capital
Income (Loss)
Earnings
interests
Equity
Balance at January 1, 2013
582,200
461,770
4,618
16,411,855
(233,563
(3,696,093
704,319
13,773,336
Effect of equity compensation plans
1,351
93,692
93,705
Issuance of stock in equity offering,
net of issuance costs
35,650
357
1,437,340
1,437,697
Redemption of preferred stock
(482,200
8,593
(9,108
(482,715
Issuance of warrant
32,359
Capital contributions
146,130
Settlement of noncontrolling interests
(7,868
(247,683
(255,551
(221,633
(13,047
Unrealized gains and amortization
on derivative contracts, net
19,521
69
Distributions and allocations
(1,462
(570,384
(134,621
(706,467
Balance at December 31, 2013
100,000
498,799
4,988
17,974,509
(435,675
(3,932,664
465,295
14,176,453
1,383
88,424
88,888
Issuance of stock in at-the-market
program, net of issuance costs
3,316
140,102
140,135
Repurchase of preferred sock
(21,765
639
(6,517
(27,643
Issuance of stock from exercise
of warrant
6,000
60
213,780
213,840
Formation of Prologis U.S. Logistics
Venture
13,721
442,251
455,972
Consolidation of Prologis North
American Industrial Fund
12,507
554,493
567,000
14,464
33,803
(36,243
(2,440
(167,950
(13,214
(181,164
Unrealized losses and amortization
(9,219
(23
(9,242
2,031
(671,495
(322,484
(991,948
Balance at December 31, 2014
509,498
1,475
57,454
26,234
83,703
1,662
71,532
71,548
Issuance of stock upon conversion of
exchangeable debt
11,872
119
502,613
502,732
Issuance of units related to KTR
acquisition
181,170
Issuance of units related to other
acquisitions
371,570
2,355,596
(173,852
(35,049
(17,240
(217
Reallocation of equity
202,812
(15,894
(186,918
Distributions and other
947
(805,535
(223,651
(1,028,239
Balance at December 31, 2015
524,512
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Straight-lined rents and amortization of above and below market leases
(59,619
(14,392
(12,080
Equity-based compensation awards
53,665
57,478
49,239
664,007
(159,262
(134,288
(97,220
Distributions from unconsolidated entities
144,045
117,938
68,319
Net changes in operating receivables from unconsolidated entities
(38,185
(7,503
7,540
Amortization of debt and deferred financing costs
(31,841
(7,324
(24,641
Gains on dispositions of investments in real estate and revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition
of a controlling interest, net
(758,887
(725,790
(715,758
86,303
165,300
277,014
(1,019
22,571
28,619
Deferred income tax benefit
(5,057
(87,240
(20,067
Increase in accounts receivable and other assets
(64,749
(93
(12,912
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities
(7,872
(63,871
(80,120
963,410
704,531
484,989
Investing activities:
Real estate development activity
(1,339,904
(1,064,220
(853,082
Real estate acquisitions
(890,183
(612,330
(514,611
KTR acquisition, net of cash received
(4,809,499
Tenant improvements and lease commissions on previously leased space
(154,564
(133,957
(145,424
Nondevelopment capital expenditures
(83,351
(78,610
(82,610
Proceeds from dispositions and contributions of real estate properties
2,795,249
2,285,488
5,409,745
(474,420
(739,635
(1,221,155
Acquisition of a controlling interest in unconsolidated co-investment ventures, net of cash received
(590,390
(678,642
Return of investment from unconsolidated entities
170,025
244,306
411,853
Proceeds from repayment of notes receivable backed by real estate
9,866
188,000
Proceeds from the settlement of net investment hedges
129,149
31,409
8,842
Payments on the settlement of net investment hedges
(981
(18,370
(994
(4,648,613
(488,309
2,333,922
Financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
90,258
378,247
1,505,791
Distributions paid on common and preferred stock
(804,697
(672,190
(573,854
Repurchase and redemption of preferred stock
(482,500
Noncontrolling interests contributions
2,355,367
468,280
145,522
Noncontrolling interests distributions
(215,740
(315,426
(115,999
Purchase of noncontrolling interests
(2,560
(250,740
Debt and equity issuance costs paid
(32,012
(23,420
(77,017
Net payments on credit facilities
(7,970
(717,369
(93,075
Repurchase and payments of debt
(3,156,294
(4,205,806
(6,012,433
Proceeds from issuance of debt
5,381,862
4,779,950
3,588,683
3,608,214
(337,817
(2,365,622
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
(9,623
(18,842
(62,970
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(86,612
(140,437
390,319
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
491,129
100,810
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
See Note 19 for information on noncash investing and financing activities and other information.
PROLOGIS, L.P.
LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL
Capital:
Partners’ capital:
General partner – preferred
General partner – common
14,589,700
13,897,274
Limited partners – common
186,683
48,189
Limited partners – Class A common
245,991
Total partners’ capital
15,100,609
14,023,698
3,320,227
1,159,901
Total capital
Total liabilities and capital
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
44,950
100,900
8,920
880,565
638,384
344,129
Less preferred unit distributions
Loss on preferred unit redemption/repurchase
Net earnings attributable to common unitholders
873,914
624,436
316,630
Weighted average common units outstanding – Basic
525,912
501,349
487,936
Weighted average common units outstanding – Diluted
Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders – Basic:
Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders – Basic
Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders – Diluted:
Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders – Diluted
Distributions per common unit
(44,950
(100,900
(8,920
32,862
12,666
12,261
Comprehensive income attributable to common unitholders
687,069
473,151
141,300
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CAPITAL
General Partner
Limited Partners
Common
Class A Common
Units
Amount
21,300
12,486,817
1,893
51,194
653,125
1,208
Issuance of units in exchange for
contribution of equity offering
proceeds
Redemption of preferred units
(19,300
(515
Issuance of warrant by Prologis, Inc.
(242,745
(250,613
Foreign currency translation
losses, net
(786
(12,261
(571,846
(126
(3,476
(136,083
(711,405
2,000
13,611,158
1,767
48,209
417,086
2,201
88,438
contribution of at-the-market
offering proceeds
Repurchase of preferred units
(435
(5,878
proceeds from exercise of warrant
(548
(12,666
(669,464
(2,100
(320,384
1,565
7,733
3,393
57,469
303
Issuance of units upon conversion of
4,500
157
6,534
8,894
365,036
(1,520
(667
(32,862
(151
(66
Reallocation of capital
186,918
(70,965
(115,953
(804,588
(16
(10,541
(5,752
(207,358
6,711
PROLOGIS, L.P
Proceeds from issuance of common partnership units in exchange for contributions from Prologis, Inc.
Distributions paid on common and preferred units
(820,989
(674,344
(580,862
Repurchase and redemption of preferred units
(199,845
(313,272
(113,928
(2,163
(245,803
Debt and capital issuance costs paid
PROLOGIS, INC. AND PROLOGIS, L.P.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Description of Business
Prologis, Inc. (or the “Parent”) commenced operations as a fully integrated real estate company in 1997, elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), and believes the current organization and method of operation will enable it to maintain its status as a REIT. The Parent is the general partner of Prologis, L.P. (or the “Operating Partnership”). Through the Operating Partnership, we are engaged in the ownership, acquisition, development and management of industrial properties in global and regional markets throughout the Americas, Europe and Asia. Our current business strategy consists of two operating business segments: Real Estate Operations and Strategic Capital. Our Real Estate Operations segment represents the ownership of industrial properties. Our Strategic Capital segment represents the management of co-investment ventures and other unconsolidated entities. See Note 18 for further discussion of our business segments. Unless otherwise indicated, the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements apply to both the Parent and the Operating Partnership. The terms “the Company,” “Prologis,” “we,” “our” or “us” means the Parent and Operating Partnership collectively.
For each share of common stock or preferred stock the Parent issues, the Operating Partnership issues a corresponding common or preferred partnership unit, as applicable, to the Parent in exchange for the contribution of the proceeds from the stock issuance. At December 31, 2015, the Parent owned an approximate 97.12% common general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership and 100% of the preferred units in the Operating Partnership. The remaining approximate 2.88% common limited partnership interests, which include 8.9 million units of Class A common limited partnership units (“Class A Units”) in the Operating Partnership, are owned by unaffiliated investors and certain current and former directors and officers of the Parent. Each partner’s percentage interest in the Operating Partnership is determined based on the number of Operating Partnership units owned as compared to total Operating Partnership units outstanding as of each period end and is used as the basis for the allocation of net income or loss to each partner. At the end of each reporting period, a capital adjustment is made in the Operating Partnership to reflect the appropriate ownership interest for each of the common unitholders. These adjustments are reflected in the line items Reallocation of Equity and Reallocation of Capital.
As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Parent has complete responsibility and discretion in the day-to-day management and control of the Operating Partnership and we operate the Parent and the Operating Partnership as one enterprise. The management of the Parent consists of the same members as the management of the Operating Partnership. These members are officers of the Parent and employees of the Operating Partnership or one of its subsidiaries. As general partner with control of the Operating Partnership, the Parent consolidates the Operating Partnership. Because the Parent’s only significant asset is its investment in the Operating Partnership, the assets and liabilities of the Parent and the Operating Partnership are the same on their respective financial statements.
Information with respect to the square footage, number of buildings and acres of land is unaudited
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and are presented in our reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. All material intercompany transactions with consolidated entities have been eliminated.
We consolidate all entities that are wholly owned and those in which we own less than 100% of the equity but control, as well as any variable interest entities in which we are the primary beneficiary. We evaluate our ability to control an entity and whether the entity is a variable interest entity and we are the primary beneficiary through consideration of substantive terms of the arrangement to identify which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity.
For entities that are not defined as variable interest entities, we first consider whether we are the general partner or the limited partner (or the equivalent in such investments that are not structured as partnerships). We consolidate entities in which we are the general partner and the limited partners in such entities do not have rights that would preclude control. For entities in which we are the general partner but do not control the entity as the other partners hold substantive participating or kick-out rights, we apply the equity method of accounting since as the general partner we have the ability to influence the venture. For ventures for which we are a limited partner or our investment is in an entity that is not structured similar to a partnership, we consider factors such as ownership interest, voting control, authority to make decisions, and contractual and substantive participating rights of the partners. In instances where the factors indicate that we control the venture, we consolidate the entity.
Reclassifications. Certain amounts included in the Consolidated Financial Statements for 2014 and 2013 have been reclassified to conform to the 2015 financial statement presentation.
Use of Estimates. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we made are reasonable and appropriate, as discussed in the applicable sections throughout the Consolidated Financial Statements, different assumptions and estimates could materially impact our reported results.
Foreign Operations. The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for our consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated entities operating in the United States and Mexico and certain of our consolidated subsidiaries that operate as holding companies for foreign investments. The functional currency for our consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated entities operating in countries other than the United States and Mexico is the principal currency in which the entity’s assets, liabilities, income and expenses are denominated, which may be different from the local currency of the country of incorporation or where the entity conducts its operations.
The functional currencies of our consolidated subsidiaries and unconsolidated entities generally include the Brazilian real, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Chinese renminbi, euro, Japanese yen and Singapore dollar. We take part in business transactions denominated in these and other local currencies where we operate.
For our consolidated subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, we translate their financial statements into the U.S. dollar at the time we consolidate those subsidiaries’ financial statements. Generally, assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. The resulting translation adjustments are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (“AOCI”). Certain balance sheet items, primarily equity and capital-related accounts, are reflected at the historical exchange rate. Income statement accounts are translated using the average exchange rate for the period and income statement accounts that represent significant nonrecurring transactions are translated at the rate in effect at the date of the transaction. We translate our share of the net earnings or losses of our unconsolidated entities whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar at the average exchange rate for the period.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
We and certain of our consolidated subsidiaries have intercompany and third-party debt that is not denominated in the entity’s functional currency. When the debt is remeasured against the functional currency of the entity, a gain or loss can result. The resulting adjustment is reflected in results of operations, unless it is intercompany debt that is deemed to be long-term in nature and then the adjustment is reflected as a cumulative translation adjustment in AOCI.
Business Combinations. When we acquire a business or individual operating properties, we allocate the purchase price to the various components of the acquisition based on the fair value of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including an allocation to the individual buildings acquired. We generally acquire operating properties that meet the definition of a business and we expense transaction costs as incurred. The initial allocation of the purchase price is based on management’s preliminary assessment, which may differ when final information becomes available. Subsequent adjustments made to the initial purchase price allocation are made within the allocation period, not to exceed one year.
When we obtain control of an unconsolidated entity, we account for the acquisition in accordance with the guidance for a business combination achieved in stages. We remeasure our previously held interest in the unconsolidated entity at its acquisition-date fair value and recognize the resulting gain or loss, if any, in earnings at the acquisition date.
We allocate the purchase price using primarily Level 2 and Level 3 inputs (further defined in Fair Value Measurements below) as follows:
Investments in Real Estate Properties. We value operating properties as if vacant. We estimate fair value generally by applying an income approach methodology using a discounted cash flow analysis. Key assumptions in the discounted cash flow analysis include market rents, growth rates and discount and capitalization rates. We determine discount and capitalization rates by market based on recent transactions and other market data. The fair value of land is generally based on relevant market data, such as a comparison of the subject site to similar parcels that have recently been sold or are currently being offered on the market for sale.
Intangible Assets. We determine the portion of the purchase price related to intangible assets as follows:
In-Place Leases. We calculate the fair value of in place leases in each of the applicable markets. The value is recorded in Other Assets and amortized over the remaining life of the respective leases to amortization expense.
Above and Below Market Leases. We recognize an asset or liability for acquired leases with favorable or unfavorable rents based on our estimate of current market rents of the applicable markets. The value is recorded in either Other Assets or Other Liabilities, as appropriate, and is amortized over the term of the respective leases, including any bargain renewal options, to rental revenue.
Debt. We estimate the fair value of debt based on contractual future cash flows discounted using borrowing spreads and market interest rates that would be available to us for the issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. In the case of publicly traded debt, we estimate the fair value based on available market data. Any discount or premium to the principal amount is included in the carrying value and amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the related debt using the effective interest method.
Noncontrolling Interests. We estimate the portion of the fair value of the net assets owned by third parties based on the fair value of the consolidated net assets, principally real estate properties and debt.
Working Capital. We estimate fair value of other acquired assets and assumed liabilities on the best information available.
Fair Value Measurements. The objective of fair value is to determine the price that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (the exit price). We estimate fair value using available market information and valuation methodologies we believe to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, accordingly, they are not necessarily indicative of amounts that we would realize on disposition. The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels:
Level 1 — Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity can access at the measurement date.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements. We estimate the fair value of our financial instruments using available market information and valuation methodologies we believe to be appropriate for these purposes as follows:
Debt. We estimate the fair value of our senior notes and exchangeable senior notes for disclosure purposes based on quoted market prices for the same (Level 1) or similar (Level 2) issues when current quoted market prices are available. We estimate the fair value of our credit facilities, term loans, secured mortgage debt and assessment bonds by discounting the future cash flows using rates and borrowing spreads currently available to us (Level 3).
Derivatives. We determine the fair value of our derivative instruments using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves, foreign exchange rates, and implied volatilities. We determine the fair values of our interest rate swaps using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts or payments and the discounted expected variable cash payments. We base the variable cash payments on an expectation of future interest rates, or forward curves, derived from observable market interest rate curves. We base the fair values of our net investment hedges on the change in the spot rate at the end of the period as compared with the strike price at inception.
We incorporate credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both our nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we consider the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees.
We have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Although the credit valuation adjustments associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties, we assess the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of our derivatives.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis generally consist of real estate assets and investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities that were subject to impairment charges related to our change of intent to sell the investments and through our recoverability analysis discussed below. We estimate fair value based on expected sales prices in the market (Level 2).
Long-Lived Assets.
Real Estate Assets. Real estate assets are carried at depreciated cost. We capitalize costs incurred in developing, renovating, rehabilitating and improving real estate assets as part of the investment basis of real estate assets. We expense costs for repairs and maintenance of the real estate assets as incurred.
During the land development and construction periods of qualifying projects, we capitalize interest costs, insurance, real estate taxes and general and administrative costs of the personnel performing the development, renovation, and rehabilitation; if such costs are incremental and identifiable to a specific activity to ready the asset for its intended use. We capitalize transaction costs relates to the acquisition of land for future development. We capitalize costs incurred to successfully originate a lease that result directly from and are essential to acquire that lease, including internal costs that are incremental and identifiable as leasing activities. Leasing costs that meet the requirements for capitalization are presented as a component of Other Assets.
We charge the depreciable portions of real estate assets to depreciation expense on a straight-line basis over the respective estimated useful lives. Depreciation commences when the asset is ready for its intended use, which we define as the earlier of stabilization (90% occupied) or one year after completion of construction. We generally use the following useful lives: 5 to 7 years for capital improvements, 10 years for standard tenant improvements, 25 years for depreciable land improvements, 30 years for operating properties acquired and 40 years for operating properties we develop. We depreciate building improvements on land parcels subject to ground leases over the shorter of the estimated building improvement life or the contractual term of the underlying ground lease. Capitalized leasing costs are amortized over the estimated remaining lease term. Our weighted average lease term based on square feet for all leases, in effect at December 31, 2015, was six years.
We assess the carrying values of our respective long-lived assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be fully recoverable. We measure the recoverability of the real estate asset by comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted cash flows. If our analysis indicates that the carrying value of the real estate property that we expect to hold is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, we recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the current estimated fair value of the real estate property.
We estimate the future undiscounted cash flows based on our intent as follows:
for real estate properties that we intend to hold long-term; including land held for development, properties currently under development and operating buildings; recoverability is assessed based on the estimated undiscounted future net rental income from operating the property and the terminal value, including anticipated costs to develop;
for real estate properties we intend to sell, including properties currently under development and operating buildings; recoverability is assessed based on proceeds from disposition that are estimated based on future net rental income of the property, expected market capitalization rates and anticipated costs to develop;
for land parcels we intend to sell, recoverability is assessed based on estimated proceeds from disposition; and
for costs incurred related to the potential acquisition of land or development of a real estate property, recoverability is assessed based on the probability that the acquisition or development is likely to occur at the measurement date.
Assets Held for Sale or Contribution. We classify a property as held for sale or contribution when certain criteria are met, in accordance with GAAP. Assets classified as held for sale are expected to be sold to a third party and assets classified as held for contribution are newly developed assets we intend to contribute to our unconsolidated co-investment ventures or to a third party. At such time, the respective assets and liabilities are presented separately in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and depreciation is no longer recognized. Assets held for sale or contribution are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or their estimated fair value less the costs to sell the assets.
Discontinued Operations. Under new accounting guidance issued in 2014, only disposals of a component of an entity, or a group of components of an entity, representing a strategic shift in operations would be presented as discontinued operations. Under this guidance, none of our property dispositions qualified as discontinued operations in 2015 or 2014. However, the results of operations for real estate properties sold in 2013 or held for sale at the end of the year were shown under Discontinued Operations in the Consolidated Statements of Income following the previous accounting standard.
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities. We present our investments in certain entities under the equity method. We use the equity method when we have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the venture but do not have control of the entity. Under the equity method, we initially recognize these investments (including advances) in the balance sheet at our cost, including formation costs and net of deferred gains from the contribution of properties, if applicable. We subsequently adjust the accounts to reflect our proportionate share of net earnings or losses recognized and accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, distributions received, contributions made and certain other adjustments, as appropriate. When circumstances indicate there may have been a reduction in the value of an equity investment, we evaluate whether the loss in value is other than temporary. If we conclude it is other than temporary, we recognize an impairment charge to reflect the equity investment at fair value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. We consider all cash on hand, demand deposits with financial institutions and short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Our cash and cash equivalents are financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk. We invest our cash with high-credit quality institutions. Cash balances may be invested in money market accounts that are not insured. We have not realized any losses in such cash investments or accounts and believe that we are not exposed to any significant credit risk.
Derivative Financial Instruments. We may use derivative financial instruments for the purpose of managing foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. All of our derivative financial instruments are customized derivative transactions and are not exchange-traded. Management reviews our hedging program, derivative positions, and overall risk management strategy on a regular basis. We only enter into transactions that we believe will be highly effective at offsetting the underlying risk. Our use of derivatives involves the risk that counterparties may default on a derivative contract. We establish exposure limits for each counterparty to minimize this risk and provide counterparty diversification. Substantially all of our derivative exposures are with counterparties that have long-term credit ratings of single-A or better. We enter into master agreements with counterparties that generally allow for netting of certain exposures; thereby significantly reducing the actual loss that would be incurred should a counterparty fail to perform its contractual obligations. To
mitigate pre-settlement risk, minimum credit standards become more stringent as the duration of the derivative financial instrument increases. On the basis of these factors, we consider the risk of counterparty default to be minimal.
We recognize all derivatives at fair value within the line items Other Assets or Other Liabilities, as applicable. We do not net our derivative position by counterparty for purposes of balance sheet presentation and disclosure. Derivatives can be designated as fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations. The accounting for gains and losses that result from changes in the fair values of derivative instruments depends on whether the derivatives are designated as, and qualify as, hedging instruments. For derivatives that will be accounted for as hedging instruments, at inception of the transaction, we formally designate and document the financial instrument as a hedge of a specific underlying exposure, the risk management objective and the strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction. In addition, we formally assess both at inception and at least quarterly thereafter, the effectiveness of our hedging transactions. The ineffective portion of a derivative financial instrument's change in fair value, if any, is immediately recognized in earnings. We also use derivatives that are not designated as hedges (and may not meet the hedge accounting requirements) to manage our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges and hedges of net investments in foreign operations are recorded in AOCI. Due to the high degree of effectiveness between the hedging instruments and the underlying exposures hedged, fluctuations in the value of the derivative instruments will generally be offset by changes in the fair values or cash flows of the underlying exposures being hedged. The changes in fair values of derivatives that were not designated or did not qualify as hedging instruments are immediately recognized in earnings. For cash flow hedges, we reclassify changes in the fair value of derivatives into the applicable line item in the Consolidated Statements of Income in which the hedged items are recorded in the same period that the underlying hedged items affect earnings.
Foreign Currency. We primarily manage our foreign currency exposure by borrowing in the currencies in which we invest. In certain circumstances, we may issue debt in a currency that is not the same functional currency of the borrowing entity to offset the translation and economic exposures related to our net investment in international subsidiaries. To mitigate the impact of the translation from the fluctuations in exchange rates, we may designate the debt as a nonderivative financial instrument hedge. We also hedge our investments in certain international subsidiaries using foreign currency derivative contracts (net investment hedges) to offset the translation and economic exposures related to our investments in these subsidiaries by locking in a forward exchange rate at the inception of the hedge. To the extent we have an effective hedging relationship, we report all changes in fair value of the hedged portion of the nonderivative financial instruments and net investment hedges in equity in the foreign currency translation component of AOCI. These amounts offset the translation adjustments on the underlying net assets of our foreign investments, which we also record in AOCI. The changes in fair value of the portion of the nonderivative financial instruments that are not designated as hedges are recorded directly in earnings within the line item Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses) and Related Amortization, Net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. We recognize ineffectiveness, if any, in earnings at the time the ineffectiveness occurred.
We may use foreign currency option contracts, including puts, calls and collars to mitigate foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with the translation of our projected net operating income of our international subsidiaries, principally in Canada, Europe and Japan. Put option contracts provide us with the option to exchange foreign currency for U.S. dollars at a fixed exchange rate if the foreign currency were to depreciate against the U.S. dollar. Call option contracts create an obligation to exchange foreign currency for U.S. dollars at a fixed exchange rate if the foreign currency were to appreciate against the U.S. dollar. Collar option contracts combine the put and call options into one contract to effectively lock in a range around the rate at which net operating income of our subsidiaries will be translated into U.S. dollars. Foreign currency option contracts are not designated as hedges as they do not meet hedge accounting requirements. Changes in the fair value of non-hedge designated derivatives are recorded directly in earnings within the line item Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses) and Related Amortization, Net.
We may also use foreign currency forwards designed as cash flow hedges to mitigate foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with payments in a currency that is not the functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries. To the extent we have an effective hedging relationship, we report all changes in fair value of the hedged portion of the foreign currency forwards cash flow hedges in AOCI. We recognize ineffectiveness, if any, in earnings at the time the ineffectiveness occurred.
Interest Rate. Our interest rate risk management strategy is to limit the impact of future interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows as well as to stabilize interest expense and manage our exposure to interest rate movements. We primarily accomplish this by issuing fixed rate debt with staggering maturities. We may enter into interest rate swap agreements, which allow us to borrow on a fixed rate basis for longer-term debt issuances, or interest rate cap agreements, which allow us to minimize the impact of increases in interest rates. We typically designate our interest rate swap and interest rate cap agreements as cash flow hedges as these derivative instruments may be used to manage the interest rate risk on potential future debt issuances or to fix the interest rate on variable rate debt issuances. The maximum length of time that we hedge our exposure to future cash flows is typically 10 years or less. We have entered into interest rate swap agreements that allow us to receive variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for us making fixed-rate payments over the life of our agreements without the exchange of the underlying notional amount.
We report the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative as a component of AOCI, and reclassify it to Interest Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income over the corresponding period of the hedged item. To the extent the hedged debt is paid off early, we write off the remaining balance in AOCI and we recognize the amount in Gains (Losses) on Early Extinguishment of Debt, Net in the Consolidated Statements of Income. We recognize losses on a derivative representing hedge ineffectiveness in Interest Expense at the time the ineffectiveness occurred.
Noncontrolling Interests. Noncontrolling interests represent the share of consolidated entities owned by third parties. We recognize each noncontrolling holder’s respective share of the estimated fair value of the net assets at the date of formation or acquisition. Noncontrolling interests are subsequently adjusted for the noncontrolling holder’s share of additional contributions, distributions and their share of the net earnings or losses of each respective consolidated entity. We allocate net income to noncontrolling interests based on the weighted-average ownership interest during the period. The net income that is not attributable to us is reflected in the line item Less Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. We do not recognize a gain or loss on transactions with a consolidated entity in which we do not own 100% of the equity, but we reflect the difference in cash received or paid from the noncontrolling interests carrying amount as paid-in-capital.
Certain limited partnership interests are exchangeable into our common stock. Common stock issued upon exchange of a holder’s noncontrolling interest is accounted for at the carrying value of the surrendered limited partnership interest.
Costs of Raising Capital. We treat costs incurred in connection with the issuance of common and preferred stock as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. We capitalize costs incurred in connection with the issuance of debt, other than our credit facilities, as a direct deduction of Debt and amortize those costs to interest expense over the term of the related debt. We capitalize costs related to our credit facilities, as defined in Note 9, in Other Assets. Costs associated with debt modifications are expensed when incurred.
AOCI. For the Parent, we include AOCI as a separate component of stockholders' equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the Operating Partnership, AOCI is included in partners’ capital in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any reference to AOCI in this document is referring to the component of stockholders’ equity for the Parent and partners’ capital for the Operating Partnership.
54
Revenue Recognition.
Rental Revenue. We lease our operating properties to customers under agreements that are classified as operating leases. We recognize the total minimum lease payments provided for under the leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Generally, under the terms of our leases, the majority of our rental expenses are recovered from our customers. We reflect amounts recovered from customers as revenue in the period that the applicable expenses are incurred. We make a provision for possible loss if the collection of a receivable balance is considered doubtful.
Strategic Capital Revenue. Strategic capital revenue includes revenue we earn from the management services we provide to unconsolidated entities. These fees are determined in accordance with the terms specific to each arrangement and may include property and asset management fees or transactional fees for leasing, acquisition, development, construction, financing, legal and tax services provided. We may also earn incentive returns (called “promotes”) based on third-party investor returns over time, which may be during the duration of the venture or at the time of liquidation. We recognize fees when they are earned, fixed and determinable. We report these fees in Strategic Capital Revenue. The fees we earn to develop properties within these ventures are reflected in Development Management and Other Revenue on a percentage of completion basis.
We also earned fees from ventures that we consolidate. Upon consolidation these fees were eliminated from our earnings and the third party share of these fees were recognized as a reduction of Net Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests.
Gains (Losses) on Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate. We recognize gains on the disposition of real estate when the recognition criteria have been met, generally at the time the risks and rewards and title have transferred and we no longer have substantial continuing involvement with the real estate sold. We recognize losses from the disposition of real estate when known.
When we contribute a property to an unconsolidated entity in which we have an ownership interest, we do not recognize a portion of the gain realized. The amount of gain not recognized, based on our ownership interest in the entity acquiring the property, is deferred by recognizing a reduction to our investment in the applicable unconsolidated entity. We adjust our proportionate share of net earnings or losses recognized in future periods to reflect the entities’ recorded depreciation expense as if it were computed on our lower basis in the contributed properties rather than on the entity’s basis.
When a property that we originally contributed to an unconsolidated entity is disposed of to a third party, we recognize the amount of the gain we previously deferred, along with our proportionate share of the gain recognized by the unconsolidated entity. If our ownership interest in an unconsolidated entity decreases and the decrease is expected to be permanent, we recognize the amounts relating to previously deferred gains to coincide with our new ownership interest.
Rental Expenses. Rental expenses primarily include the cost of our property management personnel, utilities, repairs and maintenance, property insurance and real estate taxes.
Strategic Capital Expenses. Strategic capital expenses generally include the direct expenses associated with the asset management of the unconsolidated co-investment ventures provided by our employees who are assigned to our Strategic Capital segment. In addition, in order to achieve efficiencies and economies of scale, all of our property management functions are provided by property management personnel who are assigned to our Real Estate Operations segment. These individuals perform the property-level management of the properties in our owned and managed portfolio, which include properties we consolidate and those we manage that are owned by the unconsolidated co-investment ventures. We allocate the costs of our property management to the properties we consolidate (included in Rental Expenses) and the properties owned by the unconsolidated co-investment ventures (included in Strategic Capital Expenses) by using the square feet owned by the respective portfolios.
Equity-Based Compensation. We account for equity-based compensation by measuring the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the fair value of the award on the grant date. We recognize the cost of the award on a straight-line basis over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, generally the vesting period.
Income Taxes. Under the Internal Revenue Code, REITs are generally not required to pay federal income taxes if they distribute 100% of their taxable income and meet certain income, asset and stockholder tests. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years. Even as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our own income and property, and to federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed taxable income.
We have elected taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) status for some of our consolidated subsidiaries. This allows us to provide services that would otherwise be considered impermissible for REITs. Many of the foreign countries in which we have operations do not recognize REITs or do not accord REIT status under their respective tax laws to our entities that operate in their jurisdiction. In the United States, we are taxed in certain states in which we operate. Accordingly, we recognize income tax expense for the federal and state income taxes incurred by our TRSs, taxes incurred in certain states and foreign jurisdictions, and interest and penalties associated with our unrecognized tax benefit liabilities.
We evaluate tax positions taken in the Consolidated Financial Statements under the interpretation for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. As a result of this evaluation, we may recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities.
We recognize deferred income taxes in certain taxable entities. For federal income tax purposes, certain acquisitions have been treated as tax-free transactions resulting in a carry-over basis in assets and liabilities. For financial reporting purposes and in accordance with purchase accounting, we record all of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities at the estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. For our taxable subsidiaries, including certain international jurisdictions, we recognize the deferred income tax liabilities that represent the tax effect of the difference between the tax basis carried over and the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets at the date of acquisition. Any subsequent increases or decreases to the deferred income tax liability recorded in connection with these acquisitions, related to tax uncertainties acquired, are reflected in earnings.
Deferred income tax expense is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences (items that are treated differently for tax purposes than for financial reporting purposes) and the utilization of tax net operating losses (“NOL”) generated in prior years that had been previously recognized as deferred income tax assets. We provide for a valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets if we believe all or some portion of the deferred income tax asset may not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances that causes a change in the estimated ability to realize the related deferred income tax asset is included in deferred tax expense.
55
Environmental Costs. We incur certain environmental remediation costs, including cleanup costs, consulting fees for environmental studies and investigations, monitoring costs, and legal costs relating to cleanup, litigation defense, and the pursuit of responsible third parties. We expense costs incurred in connection with operating properties and properties previously sold. We capitalize costs related to undeveloped land as development costs and include any expected future environmental liabilities at the time of acquisition. We include costs incurred for properties to be disposed in the cost of the properties upon disposition. We maintain a liability for the estimated costs of environmental remediation expected to be incurred in connection with undeveloped land, operating properties and properties previously sold that we adjust as appropriate as information becomes available.
New Accounting Pronouncements. In September 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard update that amends the retroactive requirement to apply adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination. The update requires that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. We early adopted this standard at September 30, 2015, including business combinations with open measurement periods for which the accounting had not been finalized at September 30, 2015. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that requires the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of a deferred charge. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, but early adoption is permitted. We early adopted this standard at December 31, 2015, and applied its provisions retrospectively. The adoption resulted in the reclassification of $52.3 million and $43.2 million of unamortized debt issuance costs from Other Assets to Debt at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
In February 2015, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that amends the consolidation requirements in existing GAAP. Under the update, all entities, including limited partnerships and similar legal entities, are now within the scope of consolidation guidance, unless a scope exception applies. The presumption that a general partner controls a limited partnership has been eliminated. In addition, fees paid to decision makers that meet certain conditions no longer cause the decision makers to consolidate variable interest entities (“VIEs”). It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, but early adoption is permitted and allows for either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective adoption approach. We plan to adopt the standard on its required effective date of January 1, 2016. We are finalizing our analysis, but we do not expect the adoption to have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued an accounting standard update that requires companies to use a five step model to determine when to recognize revenue from customer contracts in an effort to increase consistency and comparability throughout global capital markets and across industries. Under the model, a company will identify the contract, identify any separate performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price and recognize revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date by one year to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The FASB also permits early adoption of the standard, but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this standard will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 3. Business Combinations
Acquisition of KTR Capital Partners and Its Affiliates
On May 29, 2015, we acquired the high quality real estate assets and operating platform with high profile customers and comparable market composition to ours from KTR Capital Partners and its affiliates (“KTR”). The portfolio consisted of 315 operating properties, aggregating 59 million square feet, 3.6 million square feet of properties under development and land parcels that will support an estimated build out of 6.8 million square feet. The properties were acquired by our consolidated co-investment venture Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture (“USLV”), of which we own 55%. The acquisition was funded through cash (which included the contribution of $2.3 billion from our venture partner and the proceeds of newly issued debt by us, as detailed in Note 9), the assumption of secured mortgage debt and the issuance of 4.5 million common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership. We incurred $24.7 million of acquisition costs during the second quarter of 2015, which are included in Other Expense.
The allocation of the purchase price required a significant amount of judgment and was based on our valuations, estimates and assumptions of the acquisition date fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. While the preliminary allocation of the purchase price is substantially complete, the valuation of the real estate properties is still being finalized. We do not expect future revisions, if any, to have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.
The allocation of the purchase price was as follows (in thousands):
5,440,923
Intangible assets, net of intangible liabilities
332,708
Accounts receivable and other assets
7,632
Debt, including premium
(735,172
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
(55,422
Total estimated purchase price
4,990,669
Our venture partner’s share of purchase price
(2,253,234
Common limited partnership units issued in the Operating Partnership
(181,170
Prologis share of cash purchase price
2,556,265
The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents our results as though the KTR acquisition had been completed on January 1, 2014. The pro forma information does not reflect the actual results of operations had the transaction actually been completed on January 1, 2014, and it is not indicative of future operating results. The results for the year ended December 31, 2015, include approximately seven months of actual results for the acquisition, the acquisition expenses, and five months of pro forma adjustments. Our results of operations in 2015 include rental revenue and rental expenses of the properties acquired of $235.7 million and $56.9 million, respectively, representing the period from acquisition through December 31, 2015.
The following amounts are in thousands, except per share amounts:
2,358,643
2,064,724
866,753
537,861
1.08
1.65
1.07
These results include certain adjustments, primarily: (i) decreased revenues from the amortization of the net assets from the acquired leases with net favorable rents relative to estimated market rents; (ii) increased depreciation and amortization expense resulting from the adjustment of real estate assets to estimated fair value and recognition of intangible assets related to in-place leases; and (iii) additional interest expense attributable to the debt issued to finance our cash portion of the acquisition offset by lower interest expense due to the accretion of the fair value adjustment of debt assumed.
Acquisition of a Controlling Interest in Prologis North American Industrial Fund
During 2014, we increased our ownership in Prologis North American Industrial Fund (“NAIF”) from 23.1% to 66.1% by acquiring the equity units from all but one partner for an aggregate of $679.0 million. This included the acquisition of $46.8 million of equity units on October 20, 2014, that resulted in our gaining control over NAIF, based on the rights of the limited partners, and therefore we began consolidating NAIF at that date. We recognized a gain of $201.3 million in Gains on Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Net.
The total purchase price was $1.1 billion, which included our investment in NAIF at the time of consolidation. The adjustments finalizing the purchase price allocation during the measurement period were not considered to be material to our financial position or results of operations.
2,658,252
138,185
Cash
87,780
5,664
(1,195,213
(57,655
(554,493
Total purchase price
1,082,520
Our results of operations for 2014 included rental revenue and rental expenses of the properties acquired in the NAIF acquisition of $49.2 million and $13.3 million, respectively, offset by the impact of noncontrolling interests.
2013 Acquisitions of Controlling Interests in Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures
During 2013, we acquired real estate from three unconsolidated co-investment ventures through the conclusion of the venture or the acquisition of our partner’s interest. In connection with these transactions, we remeasured our equity investment to fair value and recognized gains of $34.8 million in Gains on Dispositions of Investments in Real Estate and Revaluation of Equity Investments upon Acquisition of a Controlling Interest, Net. The fair value was primarily based on external valuations.
On October 2, 2013, we acquired our partner’s 78.4% interest in the unconsolidated co-investment venture Prologis SGP Mexico and concluded the venture. The allocation of net assets acquired was $409.5 million in real estate properties, $4.0 million of net other assets and $158.4 million in debt. All properties acquired in the transaction were contributed in June 2014 to an unconsolidated co-investment venture in Mexico, as discussed in Note 4.
On August 6, 2013, we concluded the unconsolidated co-investment venture Prologis North American Industrial Fund III. The venture sold 73 properties to a third party and we subsequently acquired the remaining properties through the purchase of our partner’s 80% ownership interest in the venture. The allocation of net assets acquired was $519.2 million in real estate properties and $22.0 million of net other assets. These properties were contributed in January 2014 to a consolidated venture in which we own 55% of the equity as discussed in Note 12.
In the second quarter of 2013, we concluded an unconsolidated co-investment venture in Japan.
The results of operations for these properties were not significant in 2013.
Note 4. Real Estate
Investments in real estate properties consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars and square feet in thousands):
Square Feet and Acres (1)
Number of Buildings (1)
Industrial operating properties:
Improved land
5,874,052
4,227,637
Buildings and improvements
333,830
282,282
1,872
17,861,693
14,407,815
Development portfolio, including land costs:
Prestabilized
12,598
7,448
918,099
547,982
Properties under development
19,630
22,844
63
954,804
925,998
9,017
1,577,786
Other real estate investments (2)
502,927
Total investments in real estate properties
Items indicated by ‘- -‘ are not applicable.
At December 31, 2015, we owned real estate assets in the Americas (Canada, Mexico and the United States), Europe (Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom) and Asia (China, Japan and Singapore).
Acquisitions
The following table summarizes our real estate acquisition activity for the years ended December 31 (dollars and square feet in thousands):
Acquisitions of operating properties from unconsolidated co-investment ventures
Number of industrial operating properties
45,663
16,319
Real estate acquisition value
1,141,128
Gains on revaluation of equity investments upon acquisition of a controlling interest
201,319
34,787
Acquisitions of operating properties from third parties
7,375
1,004
3,262
829,598
78,314
146,331
The table above does not include the properties acquired in the KTR acquisition, as this transaction is explained in Note 3.
Dispositions
The following table summarizes our real estate disposition activity for the years ended December 31 (dollars and square feet in thousands):
8,355
25,247
71,503
Net proceeds (1)
835,385
1,825,311
6,479,707
Net gains on contributions (1)
148,987
188,268
555,196
Dispositions to third parties
23,024
19,856
2,352,645
1,365,318
177,273
Net gains on dispositions (1)
609,900
336,203
7,673
9,196
Net proceeds from dispositions
608,286
Net gains on dispositions, including related impairment charges and taxes (2)
Includes land parcels.
We recorded $1.2 million of income tax expense in 2013 related to the disposition of properties in discontinued operations.
Detail of Significant Transactions with Co-Investment Ventures (Related Parties)
Below are the significant contributions to our co-investment ventures, which are also included in the table above. We had no significant contributions in 2015.
In the second quarter of 2014, we launched the initial public offering of FIBRA Prologis, a Mexican REIT. In connection with the offering, FIBRA Prologis purchased 177 properties aggregating 29.7 million square feet (12.6 million square feet related to our wholly owned portfolio, 7.6 million square feet from our consolidated co-investment venture Prologis Mexico Fondo Logistico (“AFORES”) and 9.5 million square feet from our unconsolidated co-investment venture Prologis Mexico Industrial Fund). Also in 2014, AFORES contributed its remaining operating properties and the balance of its secured debt to FIBRA Prologis in two separate transactions. The difference between the amount received and the noncontrolling interests balance related to the properties contributed was $34.6 million, and was adjusted through equity with no gain or loss recognized. On the basis of this transaction, we recognized a gain on disposition of investments in real estate of $52.5 million; current tax expense of $32.4 million; deferred tax benefit of $55.5 million; and earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest of $61.0 million.
In the first quarter of 2013, we completed the initial public offering of Nippon Prologis REIT, Inc. (“NPR”), a publicly traded company listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. NPR acquired a portfolio of 12 properties totaling 9.6 million square feet from us for an aggregate purchase price of ¥173 billion ($1.9 billion). As a result of this transaction, we recognized a gain on disposition of investments in real estate of $337.9 million, net of a $59.6 million deferral due to our ongoing investment.
Also during the first quarter of 2013, we closed Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl (“PELP”), a European joint venture with Norges Bank Investment Management (“NBIM”). The venture acquired a portfolio from us for approximately €2.3 billion ($3.0 billion) consisting of 195 properties and 48.7 million square feet in Europe. As a result of this transaction, we recognized a gain on disposition of investments in real estate of $1.8 million, net of a deferred gain due to our ongoing investment. In connection with the closing, a warrant NBIM received at signing to acquire six million shares of our common stock with a strike price of $35.64 became exercisable. We used a Black-Scholes pricing model to value the warrant and this value was included as consideration in the overall result of the transaction. In the fourth quarter of 2014, NBIM exercised the warrant for an aggregate strike price of $213.8 million.
Operating Lease Agreements
We lease our operating properties and certain land parcels to customers under agreements that are generally classified as operating leases. Our weighted average lease term, based on square feet for all leases in effect at December 31, 2015, was six years. Our largest customer and 25 largest customers accounted for 4.5% and 20.0%, respectively, of our net effective rent (“NER”) at December 31, 2015. We calculate NER using the estimated total cash to be received over the term of the lease (including base rent and expense reimbursements) divided by the lease term to determine the amount of rent and expense reimbursements received per year.
The following table summarizes our minimum lease payments on leases with lease periods greater than one year for space in our operating properties, pre-stabilized development properties and leases of land subject to ground leases at December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
1,565,119
1,372,310
1,131,572
886,821
711,827
2,456,484
8,124,133
These amounts do not reflect future rental revenues from the renewal or replacement of existing leases and exclude reimbursements of operating expenses.
Lease Commitments
We have entered into operating ground leases as a lessee on certain land parcels, primarily on-tarmac facilities and office space with remaining lease terms of 1 to 74 years. The following table summarizes our future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases in effect at December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
32,183
29,540
27,769
25,144
24,116
220,625
359,377
Note 5. Unconsolidated Entities
Summary of Investments
We have investments in entities through a variety of ventures. We co-invest in entities that own multiple properties with partners and investors and provide asset and property management services to these entities, which we refer to as co-investment ventures. These entities may be consolidated or unconsolidated, depending on the structure, our partner’s participation and other rights and our level of control of the entity. This note details our investments in unconsolidated co-investment ventures, which are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. See Note 12 for more detail regarding our consolidated investments.
We also have other ventures, generally with one partner and that we do not manage, which we account for using the equity method. We refer to our investments in all entities accounted for using the equity method, both unconsolidated co-investment ventures and other ventures, collectively, as unconsolidated entities.
59
The following table summarizes our investments in and advances to our unconsolidated entities at December 31 (in thousands):
Unconsolidated co-investment ventures
4,585,427
4,665,918
Other ventures
170,193
158,806
The following table summarizes our investments in the individual co-investment ventures at December 31 (dollars in thousands):
Ownership
Percentage
Investment in
and Advances to
Co-Investment Venture
Prologis Targeted U.S. Logistics Fund, L.P. (“USLF”) (1)
24.3
689,408
712,044
FIBRA Prologis (2) (3)
569,800
589,627
Prologis Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I, L.P. (“Brazil Fund”) and related
joint ventures (4)
various
216,668
235,496
Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund, FCP-FIS (“PTELF”) (1)
43.2
480,401
458,702
Prologis European Properties Fund II, FCP-FIS
31.1
410,984
488,503
Europe Logistics Venture 1, FCP-FIS (“ELV”) (5)
53,960
56,127
Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl (5)
1,762,291
1,769,720
Nippon Prologis REIT, Inc. (“NPR”) (6) (7)
300,822
303,178
Prologis China Logistics Venture I, LP and II, LP
(Prologis China Logistics Venture) (5)
101,093
52,521
In December 2015, we submitted redemption requests for a portion of our investment in PTELF and USLF for €185.0 million ($201.4 million at December 31, 2015) and $200.0 million, respectively. We expect the requests to close in the second quarter of 2016 and they will be fulfilled by other investors so our ownership percentage will decrease.
At December 31, 2015, we owned 291.1 million units of FIBRA Prologis that had a closing price of Ps 26.12 ($1.51) per unit on the Mexican Stock Exchange.
We have granted FIBRA Prologis a right of first refusal with respect to stabilized properties that we plan to sell in Mexico.
We have a 50% ownership interest in and consolidate an entity that in turn owns 50% of several entities that we account for on the equity method. Also, we have additional investments in other unconsolidated entities in Brazil that we account for on the equity method with various ownership interests ranging from 5-50%.
We have one partner in each of these co-investment ventures.
(6)
At December 31, 2015, we owned 261,310 units of NPR that had a closing price of ¥218,500 ($1,815) per share on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had receivables from NPR of $85.2 million and $85.9 million, respectively, related to customer security deposits that originated through a leasing company owned by us that pertain to properties owned by NPR. We have a corresponding payable to NPR’s customers in Other Liabilities.
(7)
For any properties we develop and plan to sell in Japan, we have committed to offer those properties to NPR.
The amounts recognized in Strategic Capital Revenue and Earnings from Unconsolidated Entities, Net depend on the size and operations of the co-investment ventures, the timing of promotes, as well as fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Our ownership interest in these ventures also impacts the equity in earnings we recognize. The income is reduced by recognized expenses for direct costs associated with the asset management of these ventures and allocated property-level management costs for the properties owed by the ventures. The co-investment venture information below represents the venture’s information (not our proportionate share) prepared on a GAAP basis.
The following tables summarize these unconsolidated co-investment ventures at December 31 and for the years ended December 31:
(dollars and square feet in millions)
Number of properties owned
596
590
709
Third-party debt
2,090
2,989
2,258
2,414
3,167
Our investment balance (1)
1,476
1,537
1,194
Our weighted average ownership (2)
29.8
31.0
22.7
688
636
571
2,640
2,621
2,979
3,584
3,501
4,095
2,707
2,773
2,703
38.9
38.8
39.0
66
1,520
1,637
1,697
1,751
1,734
1,881
402
356
353
Totals:
6,250
6,531
7,665
7,593
7,649
9,143
4,585
4,666
4,250
31.6
32.0
(in millions)
2014 (3)
2013 (3)
Revenues
610
711
Net operating income
465
527
513
Net earnings
113
1,001
801
741
787
621
261
268
131
275
280
224
212
219
175
77
1,832
1,992
1,727
1,418
1,533
451
408
237
The difference between our ownership interest of a venture’s equity and our investment balance results principally from three types of transactions: (i) deferring a portion of the gains we recognize from a contribution of a property to a venture ($430.7 million, $322.9 million and $139.6 million at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively); (ii) recording additional costs associated with our investment in the venture; and (iii) advances to a venture.
Represents our weighted average ownership interest in all co-investment ventures based on each entity’s contribution of total assets, before depreciation, net of other liabilities.
We had significant activity with our unconsolidated co-investment ventures in 2014 and 2013 as explained in both Note 3 and Note 4. We formed and invested in FIBRA Prologis in 2014. In connection with this transaction, we concluded our unconsolidated co-investment venture in Mexico. We began consolidating NAIF in 2014. During 2013, we concluded three co-investment ventures and we started two new co-investment ventures.
The following table summarizes the amounts we recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income as our share of the earnings and fee revenue from unconsolidated co-investment ventures for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Earnings from unconsolidated co-investment ventures, net:
35,966
8,596
21,724
106,656
108,430
63,839
12,780
14,022
9,091
Total earnings from unconsolidated co-investment ventures, net
155,402
131,048
94,654
Strategic capital revenue and other revenue:
59,480
94,354
70,642
112,675
86,487
63,794
35,453
37,509
42,749
Total strategic capital revenue
207,608
218,350
177,185
Development management and other revenue
7,467
5,424
4,007
Total strategic capital revenue and other revenue
215,075
223,774
181,192
The following table summarizes the promotes earned and recognized in Strategic Capital Revenue and the related cash expense for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Strategic capital revenue
Total promote (1)
56,637
42,132
7,878
Less: Prologis’ share
27,175
10,852
1,512
Net promote recognized (third-party share) in strategic capital revenue
29,462
31,280
6,366
Related cash bonus included in strategic capital expense (2)
4,700
4,239
1,273
We earned promotes from PELP and ELV in 2015 and USLF in 2014, each based on the venture’s cumulative returns to the investors over the last three years. We earned a promote in connection with the conclusion of Prologis SGP Mexico in 2013.
This represents the cash bonus paid, in regards to the promotes earned, pursuant to the terms of the Prologis Promote Plan. See Note 13 for more information about this plan.
Equity Commitments Related to Certain Unconsolidated Co-Investment Ventures
Certain co-investment ventures have equity commitments from us and our venture partners. Our venture partners fulfill their equity commitment with cash. We may fulfill our equity commitment through contributions of properties or cash. The venture may obtain financing for the properties and therefore the acquisition price of additional investments that the venture could make may be more than the equity commitment. Depending on market conditions, the investment objectives of the ventures, our liquidity needs and other factors, we may make additional contributions of properties or additional cash investments in these ventures through the remaining commitment period.
The following table summarizes the remaining equity commitments at December 31, 2015 (in millions):
Equity Commitments
Expiration Date
for Remaining Commitments
Prologis
Venture Partners
2016 – 2017
Prologis Targeted Europe Logistics Fund (1)
326
Prologis European Properties Fund II (1)
Prologis European Logistics Partners Sàrl (2)
February 2016
Prologis China Logistics Venture (3)
973
1,145
2016 and 2017
1,664
1,894
Equity commitments are denominated in euro and reported in U.S. dollars based on an exchange rate of $1.09 U.S. dollars to the euro.
The equity commitments for this venture are expected to fund the future repayment of debt that is denominated in British pounds sterling. The commitments will be called in euros and are reported in U.S. dollars using an exchange rate of $1.48 U.S. dollars to the British pounds sterling.
In January 2016, we reached an agreement with our partner in this venture to increase the equity commitments $882.4 million, of which our share is $132.4 million, to fund future developments in China.
62
Note 6. Assets Held for Sale or Contribution and Discontinued Operations
Assets Held for Sale or Contribution
We have classified our investments in certain real estate properties that met the criteria to be classified as held for sale. These properties are expected to be sold to third parties or contributed to unconsolidated co-investment ventures within twelve months of classification as such. The amounts included in held for sale represented real estate investment balances and the related assets and liabilities for each property. Assets held for sale or contribution consisted of the following (dollars and square feet in thousands):
Number of operating properties
5,065
457
Total assets held for sale or contribution
Total liabilities associated with assets held for sale or contribution – included in Other Liabilities
6,874
We had no property dispositions that met the criteria for discontinued operations in 2015 or 2014. The following table summarizes income for 2013, attributable to properties disposed of during 2013, or held for sale at December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
34,105
(10,633
(15,339
(1,163
Note 7. Notes Receivable Backed by Real Estate
In February 2015, we received a $197.5 million note backed by real estate in connection with the disposition of real estate to a third party. We earned interest at an annual rate of 2.0%. In February 2016, the note and all accrued interest were paid in full.
In December 2015, we received other notes backed by real estate of $37.6 million in connection with the disposition of real estate to third parties. We earn interest on the notes at an annual rate ranging from 5.5% to 10.0%. The notes have maturity dates ranging from June 2016 to April 2017.
Note 8. Other Assets and Other Liabilities
The following table summarizes our other assets, net of amortization and depreciation, if applicable, at December 31 (in thousands):
Leasing commissions and other in-place lease intangibles
613,518
241,557
Rent leveling and above market leases
276,315
224,589
Prepaid assets
107,000
105,093
Fixed assets
94,178
86,927
Accounts receivable
89,611
103,445
Value added taxes receivable
86,115
86,331
Derivative assets
53,579
106,664
Management contracts
46,293
52,896
Other notes receivable
41,262
46,570
Deferred income taxes
14,650
7,887
91,989
94,328
The following table summarizes our other liabilities, net of amortization, if applicable, at December 31 (in thousands):
Tenant security deposits
190,160
169,326
Income tax liabilities
81,125
85,200
Unearned rents
77,730
74,873
Below market leases
55,976
30,651
Deferred income
29,197
16,326
Environmental liabilities
21,484
10,878
Derivative liabilities
13,729
52,740
Value added taxes payable
10,272
13,358
154,702
173,074
The expected future amortization of leasing commissions and other in-place lease intangibles into amortization expense of $613.5 million is summarized in the table below. We also expect our above and below market leases and rent leveling net assets, which total a net $220.3 million at December 31, 2015, to be amortized into rental revenue as follows (in thousands):
Amortization Expense
Net (Increase) Decrease to
Rental Revenue
157,914
(15,421
116,958
17,381
82,876
25,903
61,672
28,096
46,599
28,103
147,499
136,277
220,339
Note 9. Debt
All debt is incurred by the Operating Partnership. The Parent does not have any indebtedness, but guarantees the unsecured debt of the Operating Partnership.
The following table summarizes our debt at December 31 (dollars in thousands):
Weighted Average Interest Rate (1)
Amount Outstanding (2)
Amount Outstanding
Credit facilities
Senior notes (3)
3.3
6,516,392
6,046,965
Exchangeable senior notes (4)
456,373
Term loans
2.1
2,100,009
1.4
568,037
Other debt (5)
6.2
15,448
16,087
Secured mortgage debt (6)
1,172,473
6.1
1,042,628
Secured mortgage debt of consolidated entities (7)
2.9
1,822,509
2.5
1,206,887
These interest rates represent the effective interest rates (including amortization of the noncash premiums, discounts or debt issuance costs) at the end of the period for the debt outstanding.
Included in the outstanding balances are borrowings denominated in non-U.S. currency, principally: euro ($3.4 billion), Japanese yen ($1.1 billion) and Canadian dollar ($0.4 million).
Notes are due January 2018 to June 2026 and effective interest rates range from 1.5% to 7.6% at December 31, 2015.
As explained below, this debt was paid off in 2015.
The balance at December 31, 2015, represents primarily assessment bonds with varying effective interest rates from 4.5% to 7.9% that are due June 2019 to September 2033. The assessment bonds are issued by municipalities and guaranteed by us as a means of financing infrastructure and secured by assessments (similar to property taxes) on various underlying real estate properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $780.3 million at December 31, 2015.
Debt is due May 2016 to December 2025 and effective interest rates range from 0.6% to 7.7% at December 31, 2015. The debt is secured by 175 real estate properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $2.9 billion at December 31, 2015.
Debt is due October 2016 to December 2027 and effective interest rates range from 1.9% to 5.3% at December 31, 2015. The debt is secured by 220 real estate properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $3.2 billion at December 31, 2015.
Credit Facilities
We have a global senior credit facility (the “Global Facility”), under which we may draw in U.S. dollars, euro, Japanese yen, British pounds sterling and Canadian dollars on a revolving basis up to $2.3 billion at December 31, 2015 (subject to currency fluctuations). The Global Facility is scheduled to mature on July 11, 2017; however, we may extend the maturity date twice, by six months each, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions and payment of extension fees. Pricing under the Global Facility, including the spread over LIBOR, facility fees and letter of credit fees, varies based on the public debt ratings of the Operating Partnership. The Global Facility contains customary representations, covenants and defaults (including a cross-acceleration to other recourse indebtedness of more than $50.0 million).
We also have a ¥45 billion ($373.8 million at December 31, 2015) Japanese yen revolver (the “Revolver”) with the ability to increase to ¥56.5 billion ($469.3 million at December 31, 2015) subject to obtaining additional lender commitments. Pricing under the Revolver was consistent with the Global Facility at December 31, 2015. The Revolver contains certain customary representations, covenants and defaults that are substantially the same as the corresponding provisions of the Global Facility.
64
We refer to the Global Facility and the Revolver, collectively, as our “Credit Facilities.” The following table summarizes information about our Credit Facilities at December 31 (in millions):
For the years ended December 31:
Weighted average daily interest rate
1.7
Weighted average daily borrowings
789
Maximum borrowings outstanding at any month-end
942
742
At December 31:
Aggregate lender – commitments
2,662
2,742
2,451
Less:
Borrowings outstanding
Outstanding letters of credit
73
Current availability
2,630
1,652
Senior Notes
The senior notes are unsecured and our obligations are effectively subordinated in certain respects to any of our debt that is secured by a lien on real property, to the extent of the value of such real property. The senior notes require interest payments be made quarterly, semi-annually or annually. All of the senior notes are redeemable at any time at our option, subject to certain prepayment penalties. Such repurchase and other terms are governed by the provisions of indenture agreements, various note purchase agreements or trust deeds.
During the years ended December 31 we issued the following senior notes (dollars and euros in thousands):
Principal Amount
Stated
Effective Interest Rate
Maturity Date
May 2015 (1)
€
700,000
785,470
1.4%
1.5%
May 2021
October 2015
750,000
3.8%
4.0%
November 2025
February 2014 (1)
959,420
3.4%
3.5%
February 2024
June 2014 (1)
500,000
680,550
3.0%
3.1%
June 2026
October 2014 (1)
600,000
756,420
October 2020
This debt is denominated in euro and the exchange rate used to calculate into U.S. dollar was the effective rate at the date of the transaction.
Exchangeable Senior Notes
Our exchangeable senior notes were issued by the Operating Partnership and were exchangeable into common stock of the Parent. The accounting for the exchangeable senior notes required us to separate the fair value of the derivative instrument (exchange feature) from the debt instrument and account for it separately as a derivative. At December 31, 2014, we adjusted the derivative instrument to fair value, which was reflected in Other Liabilities. During the reporting periods, any adjustments to the fair value of the derivative were recorded in earnings as Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses) and Related Amortization, Net. The derivative on the debt instrument was amortized over the remaining term of the exchangeable notes. During March 2015, the holders of the exchangeable notes exchanged $459.8 million of their notes for 11.9 million shares of common stock of the Parent and $0.2 million of their notes for cash.
The fair value of the derivative associated with the exchangeable debt was a liability of $51.3 million at December 31, 2014. The fair value of the exchange option was $43.0 million immediately before the exchange in March 2015. When the debt was exchanged into common stock, the value of the derivative associated with the debt was reclassified to Additional Paid-In Capital. We recognized unrealized gains of $8.3 million during the first quarter of 2015 and unrealized losses of $10.3 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, on the change in fair value of the derivative instrument associated with the exchangeable debt.
Term Loans
The following table summarizes our outstanding term loans at December 31, (dollars in thousands):
Term Loan
Borrowing Currency
Initial Borrowing Date
Lender Commitment at 2015
Balance Outstanding at 2015
Balance Outstanding at 2014
Local
USD
2014 Yen Term Loan (1)
JPY
May 2014
¥
40,916,000
339,858
342,051
LIBOR plus 1.20%
Euro Term Loan (2)
USD, EUR, JPY and GBP
June 2014
561,879
230,679
LIBOR plus 0.98%
June 2017
Senior Term Loan (3) (4)
May 2015
400,000
LIBOR plus 1.00%
May 2016
2015 Yen Term Loan (4)
June 2015
65,000,000
539,906
LIBOR plus 1.10%
June 2022
2015 Canadian Term Loan
CAD
December 2015
371,925
267,872
CDOR rate plus 1.50%
February 2023
Subtotal
2,109,515
572,730
Unamortized debt issuance costs, net
(9,506
(4,693
We may increase the borrowings to ¥51.1 billion ($424.4 million at December 31, 2015), subject to obtaining additional lender commitments.
We may increase the borrowings up to €1.0 billion ($1.1 billion at December 31, 2015), subject to obtaining additional lender commitments. We may pay down and reborrow on this term loan. We may extend the maturity date twice, by one year each, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and payment of an extension fee). During 2015, we borrowed an additional €240 million ($272.6 million). During the second quarter of 2015, we paid off the entire euro balance and subsequently borrowed $561.9 million in connection with the KTR transaction.
We may extend the maturity date by one year, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and the payment of an extension fee. The Senior Term Loan contains customary representations, covenants and defaults (including cross payment default and cross-acceleration to other recourse indebtedness of more than $100.0 million). We initially borrowed $1.0 billion under this agreement.
We entered into these term loans in connection with the KTR acquisition.
Secured Mortgage Debt and Secured Mortgage Debt of Consolidated Entities
During 2015, we assumed secured mortgage debt valued at $1.0 billion, which included debt assumed with the KTR acquisition, and includes premiums of $39.6 million. The debt has stated interest rates ranging from 2.6% to 7.6% (effective interest rates ranging from 1.9% to 4.0%) and has maturity dates of December 2016 to April 2023.
During 2015, we issued secured mortgage debt totaling $471.9 million, which included Canadian secured mortgage debt of CAD $195.0 million ($140.4 million at December 31, 2015). The debt has stated interest rates ranging from 1.7% to 3.7% (effective interest rates ranging from 2.0% to 3.7%) and has maturity dates of July 2020 to December 2025.
In connection with the acquisitions of a controlling interest in NAIF in 2014, we assumed secured mortgage debt of $1.2 billion, which includes premiums of $84.2 million. The debt has stated interest rates ranging from 5.0% to 6.5% (effective interest rates ranging from 1.9% to 3.4%) and has maturity dates of October 2016 to December 2020.
TMK bonds are a financing vehicle in Japan for special purpose companies known as TMKs. During 2015, we issued new TMK bonds (with interest rates ranging from 0.6% to 0.8% scheduled to mature from September 2016 and October 2016) totaling ¥23.0 billion ($191.0 million at December 31, 2015). During 2014, we issued ¥7.2 billion ($70.7 million) of new TMK bonds and paid off or transferred all of our outstanding TMK bonds, leaving no TMK bonds outstanding at December 31, 2014.
Debt Covenants
We have approximately $6.5 billion of senior notes and $2.1 billion of term loans outstanding at December 31, 2015 that were issued under three separate indentures, as supplemented, and are subject to certain financial covenants. We are also subject to financial covenants under our Credit Facilities and certain secured mortgage debt. At December 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants.
Long-Term Debt Maturities
Principal payments due on our debt, for each year through the period ending December 31, 2025, and thereafter were as follows at December 31, 2015 (in millions):
Unsecured
Credit
Senior
Term Loans and
Secured Mortgage
Consolidated Entities’
Total Consolidated
Maturity
Facilities
Notes
Other Debt
2016 (1) (2)
401
363
764
170
2017 (3)
563
516
1,087
167
343
403
746
618
305
924
143
1,067
849
856
1,108
1,262
341
1,616
128
1,744
762
541
1,312
1,313
850
1,151
142
1,293
132
895
896
750
129
880
881
544
550
6,572
2,126
1,164
9,862
1,759
Unamortized premiums (discounts), net
(10
(5
(48
(4
(52
6,516
1,172
9,804
1,823
We expect to repay the amounts maturing in 2016 related to our wholly owned debt with cash generated from operations, proceeds from dispositions of wholly owned real estate properties, or as necessary, with borrowings on our Credit Facilities.
Included in 2016 maturities is the Senior Term Loan that can be extended until 2017.
Included in 2017 maturities is the Euro Term Loan that can be extended until 2019.
The following table summarizes the components of interest expense from continuing operations for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Gross interest expense
394,012
377,666
471,923
Amortization of premium, net
(45,253
(21,440
(39,015
Amortization of deferred loan costs
13,412
14,116
14,374
Interest expense before capitalization
362,171
370,342
447,282
(60,808
(61,457
(67,955
Net interest expense
301,363
308,885
379,327
Total cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized
345,916
258,441
426,528
Early Extinguishment of Debt
In an effort to reduce our borrowing costs and extend our debt maturities, we repurchased certain debt, principally outstanding senior notes and secured mortgage debt, generally with proceeds from the issuance of senior notes outlined above, and in 2013, an equity offering (as described in Note 10). As a result, we recognized a gain or loss represented by the difference between the recorded debt (including premiums and discounts and related debt costs) and the consideration we paid to retire the debt, including fees.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the repurchase of debt and net loss on early extinguishment of debt for the years ending December 31 (in millions):
Senior notes:
Original principal amount
709.7
1,290.4
2,142.0
Cash purchase price
789.0
1,460.3
2,411.9
Term loans:
600.0
Cash repayment price
Secured mortgage debt:
571.5
528.0
1,570.9
595.5
531.2
1,881.2
1,818.4
3,712.9
Cash purchase/repayment price
1,984.5
1,991.5
3,982.8
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
165.3
277.0
Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity of Prologis, Inc.
Shares Authorized
At December 31, 2015, 1.1 billion shares were authorized to be issued by the Parent, of which 1.0 billion shares represent common stock. Our board of directors (the “Board”) may, without stockholder approval, classify or reclassify any unissued shares of our stock from time to time by setting or changing the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of redemption of such shares.
We issued 1.7 million and 3.3 million shares of common stock under our at-the-market (“ATM”) program during 2015 and 2014, respectively, which generated $71.5 million and $140.1 million in net proceeds, respectively. We have an equity distribution agreement that allows us to sell up to $750.0 million aggregate gross sales proceeds of shares of common stock, of which $535.2 million remains available for sale, through six designated agents, who earn a fee of up to 2% of the gross proceeds, as agreed to on a transaction-by-transaction basis.
Under the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), certain of our employees and outside directors are able to participate in equity-based compensation plans. Under this plan, we received gross proceeds for the issuance of common stock of $18.2 million, $25.8 million and $22.4 million, for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectfully. See Note 13 for additional information on this plan.
As discussed in Note 4, in 2014 NBIM exercised a warrant and paid $213.8 million in exchange for 6.0 million shares of common stock.
On April 30, 2013, we completed a public offering of 35.65 million shares of common stock at a price of $41.60 per share, generating approximately $1.4 billion in net proceeds.
Preferred Stock
At December 31, 2015 and 2014 we had one series of preferred stock outstanding, the Series Q preferred stock, with a liquidation preference of $50 per share, a par value of $0.01 and a dividend rate of 8.54%, which will be redeemable at our option on or after November 13, 2026. Holders have, subject to certain conditions, limited voting rights and all holders are entitled to receive cumulative preferential dividends based on liquidation preference. The dividends are payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of each quarter. Dividends are payable when, and if, they have been declared by the Board, out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends.
During 2014, we repurchased approximately 435,000 shares of Series Q preferred stock and recognized a loss of $6.5 million, which primarily represented the difference between the repurchase price and the carrying value of the preferred stock net of original issuance costs. In 2013, we redeemed all of the outstanding Series L, M, O, P, R and S preferred stock and recognized a loss of $9.1 million when we notified the holders of our intent to redeem these series of preferred stock.
Ownership Restrictions
For us to qualify as a REIT, five or fewer individuals may not own more than 50% of the value of our outstanding stock at any time during the last half of our taxable year. Therefore, our charter restricts beneficial ownership (or ownership generally attributed to a person under the REIT rules), by a person, or persons acting as a group, of issued and outstanding common and preferred stock that would cause that person to own or be deemed to own more than 9.8% (by value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of our issued and outstanding capital stock. Furthermore, subject to certain exceptions, no person shall at any time directly or indirectly acquire ownership of more than 25% of any of the preferred stock. These provisions assist us in protecting and preserving our REIT status and protect the interests of stockholders in takeover transactions by preventing the acquisition of a substantial block of outstanding shares of stock.
Shares of stock owned by a person or group of people in excess of these limits are subject to redemption by us. The provision does not apply where a majority of the Board, in its sole and absolute discretion, waives such limit after determining that our status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes will not be jeopardized.
To comply with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, we are generally required to make common and preferred stock dividends (other than capital gain distributions) to our stockholders in amounts that together at least equal (i) the sum of (a) 90% of our “REIT taxable income” computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and net capital gains and (b) 90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property, minus (ii) certain excess non-cash income. Our common stock distribution policy is to distribute a percentage of our cash flow that ensures that we will meet the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code and that allows us to also retain cash to meet other needs, such as capital improvements and other investment activities.
Our tax return for the year ended December 31, 2015 has not been filed. The taxability information presented for our dividends paid in 2015 is based on management’s estimate. Our tax returns for open tax years have not been examined by the Internal Revenue Service, other than those discussed in Note 14. Consequently, the taxability of dividends is subject to change.
In 2015, 2014 and 2013, we paid all of our dividends in cash. The following summarizes the taxability of our common and preferred stock dividends for the years ended December 31:
2015 (1) (2)
Common Stock:
Ordinary income
0.29
Qualified dividend
0.08
0.41
Capital gains
0.62
Total distribution
Preferred Stock – Series L (3):
- -
Preferred Stock – Series M, R and S (3):
0.42
Preferred Stock – Series O (3):
0.44
Preferred Stock – Series P (3):
0.43
Preferred Stock – Series Q:
0.77
0.71
1.01
2.88
2.55
4.27
Total dividend
Taxability for 2015 is estimated.
As discussed above, in April 2013, we redeemed all of the outstanding series L, M, O, P, R and S preferred stock.
Common stock dividends are characterized for federal income tax purposes as ordinary income, qualified dividend, capital gains, non-taxable return of capital or a combination of the four. Common stock dividends that exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits (calculated for tax purposes) constitute a return of capital rather than a dividend and generally reduce the stockholder’s basis in the common stock. To the extent that a dividend exceeds both current and accumulated earnings and profits and the stockholder’s basis in the common stock, it will generally be treated as a gain from the sale or exchange of that stockholder’s common stock. At the beginning of each year, we notify our stockholders of the taxability of the common stock dividends paid during the preceding year.
Note 11. Partners’ Capital of Prologis, L.P.
Distributions paid to the common limited partnership units and the taxability of those distributions are similar to the Parent’s common stock disclosed above.
In May 2015, we issued 4.5 million common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership in connection with the KTR acquisition (see Note 3 for more details on the transaction).
In connection with the acquisition of a portfolio of properties in October 2015, we issued 0.2 million common limited partnership units and 8.9 million Class A Units. The number of units issued was based upon an agreed upon price and had a per unit weighted average fair value at the date of issuance of $41.06. The Class A Units generally have the same rights as the existing common units of the Operating Partnership, except that the Class A Units are entitled to a quarterly distribution equal to $0.64665 per unit so long as the common units receive a quarterly distribution of at least $0.40 per unit (in the event the common units receive a quarterly distribution of less than $0.40 per unit, the Class A Unit distribution would be reduced by a proportionate amount). Class A Units are convertible into common units at an initial conversion rate of one-for-one. The conversion rate will be increased or decreased to the extent that, at the time of conversion, the net present value of the distributions paid with respect to the Class A Units are less or more than the distributions paid on common units from the time of issuance of the Class A Units until the time of conversion. At December 31, 2015, the Class A Units were convertible into 8.8 million common units. The Operating Partnership may redeem the Class A Units at any time after October 7, 2025, for an amount in cash equal to the then-current number of the common units into which the Class A Units are convertible, multiplied by $43.11, subject to the holders’ right to convert the Class A Units into common units.
Distributions paid on the common units and Class A Units, and the taxability of those distributions, are similar to dividends paid on the Parent’s common stock disclosed above.
Note 12. Noncontrolling Interests
We report noncontrolling interests related to several entities we consolidate but of which we do not own 100% of the equity. These entities include two real estate partnerships that have issued limited partnership units to third parties. Depending on the specific partnership agreements, these limited partnership units are exchangeable into shares of the Parent’s common stock (or cash), generally at a rate of one share of common stock to one unit. We evaluated the noncontrolling interests with redemption provisions that permit the issuer to settle in either cash or common stock at the option of the issuer to determine whether temporary or permanent equity classification on the balance sheet is appropriate, including the requirement to settle in unregistered shares, and determined that these units meet the requirements to qualify for presentation as permanent equity. We also consolidate several entities in which we do not own 100% of the equity and the units of these entities are not exchangeable into our common stock.
As discussed in Note 3, we began consolidating the co-investment venture NAIF in 2014.
In the first quarter of 2014, we formed a new U.S. co-investment venture, USLV, in which we hold a 55% equity ownership interest and have one partner. The venture is consolidated due to the structure and voting rights of the venture. At closing, the venture acquired from us a portfolio of 66 operating properties aggregating 12.8 million square feet for an aggregate purchase price of $1.0 billion.
The noncontrolling interests of the Parent include the noncontrolling interests presented in the Operating Partnership, as well as the common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership that are not owned by the Parent.
During 2013, net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests were $10.1 million, of which $0.5 million was a loss from continuing operations and $10.6 million was income from discontinued operations.
The following table summarizes our noncontrolling interests and the consolidated entity’s total investment in real estate and debt at December 31 (dollars and units in thousands):
Our Ownership Percentage
Noncontrolling Interests
Total Investment
in Real Estate
Prologis U.S. Logistics Venture (1)
55.0
2,677,642
427,307
6,533,089
1,006,183
724,256
66.1
490,444
544,718
2,571,092
2,771,299
1,083,650
1,188,836
Prologis Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I (2)
49,313
68,533
Other consolidated entities (3)
102,828
119,343
1,006,224
1,018,996
14,603
18,051
Prologis, L.P. noncontrolling interests
10,110,405
4,796,478
Limited partners in Prologis, L.P. (4) (5)
432,674
Prologis, Inc. noncontrolling interests
As discussed in Note 3, USLV acquired a portfolio of properties from KTR in May 2015. We received a contribution of $2.3 billion from our venture partner to fund their share of this acquisition.
The assets of Prologis Brazil Logistics Partners Fund I (“Brazil Fund”) are primarily investments in unconsolidated entities of $103.1 million and $152.0 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. For additional information on our unconsolidated investments, see Note 5.
This line item includes our two partnerships that have issued limited partnership units to third parties, as discussed above, along with various other consolidated entities. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, limited partnership units were exchangeable into cash or, at our option, 1,835 and 1,887 shares, respectively, of the Parent’s common stock. In 2015, 52 limited partnership units were redeemed for cash of $3.2 million. All of these outstanding limited partnership units receive quarterly cash distributions equal to the quarterly dividends paid on our common stock pursuant to the terms of the applicable partnership agreements.
Includes 8.9 million of Class A Units issued in the fourth quarter of 2015. See Note 11 for further discussion of our Class A Units.
We issued 4.7 million common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership, principally in connection with the KTR acquisition. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, excluding the Class A Units, there were common limited partnership units in the Operating Partnership that were exchangeable into cash or, at our option, 6.4 million and 1.8 million shares of the Parent’s common stock. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the fair value of the 6.4 million and 1.8 million shares, respectively, would be $275.0 million and $76.0 million, respectively, based on the closing stock price of the Parent’s common stock. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, there were 1.2 million and 0.1 million LTIP Units (as defined in Note 13) outstanding, respectively, associated with our long-term compensation plan that are not exchangeable into common units of the Operating Partnership and redeemable into the Parent’s common stock until they vest and other applicable conditions are met. All of these outstanding limited partnership units receive quarterly cash distributions equal to the quarterly distributions paid on our common stock pursuant to the terms of the partnership agreement.
Note 13. Long-Term Compensation
In May 2012, stockholders approved the 2012 LTIP. All outstanding awards granted under the previous plans remain outstanding in accordance with their terms. The 2012 LTIP provides for grants of awards to officers, directors, employees, and consultants of the Parent or its subsidiaries. Awards can be in the form of stock options (non-qualified options and incentive stock options), stock appreciation rights and full value awards (restricted stock, restricted stock units, Operating Partnership units (“LTIP Units”), special outperformance plan type of LTIP Units and cash incentive awards). No participant can be granted more than 1.5 million awards under the 2012 LTIP in any one calendar year. Awards may be made under the 2012 LTIP until it is terminated by the Board or until the ten-year anniversary of the effective date of the plan. We began granting awards in the form of LTIP Units during 2014. An LTIP Unit represents a partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. After vesting and the satisfaction of certain conditions, an LTIP Unit may be exchangeable for a common unit in the Operating Partnership and then redeemable for a share of common stock.
We have 27.2 million shares reserved for issuance, of which 21.7 million shares of common stock were available for future issuance at December 31, 2015. Each LTIP Unit counts as one share of common stock for purposes of calculating the limit on shares that may be issued.
Outperformance Plan (“OPP”)
We grant awards in the form of points under our OPP corresponding to three-year performance periods. The fair value of the awards are measured at the grant date and amortized over the performance period. OPP awards are earned to the extent our total stockholder return (“TSR”) for the performance period exceeds the TSR for the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) US REIT Index for the same period plus 100 basis points. If this outperformance hurdle is met, the compensation pool is equal to 3% of the excess value created, subject to a maximum of the greater of $75 million or 0.5% of our equity market capitalization at the start of the performance period. Each participant is allocated a percentage of the total compensation pool. Awards earned at the end of the performance period cannot be paid to participants
unless our absolute TSR, as defined in the plan, is positive for the performance period. If we outperform the TSR for the MSCI US REIT Index plus 100 basis points, but the absolute TSR is not positive, payment will be delayed until such time as our absolute TSR becomes positive. If after seven years our absolute TSR has not become positive, the awards will be forfeited.
We used the Monte Carlo valuation model to value the points granted under the OPP. The points relate to a three-year performance period that begins on January 1 of the year granted. If the performance criteria are met, the participants’ points will be paid in the form of common stock or LTIP Units. In 2014, we began offering participants the election to choose the form of payment of awards earned, if any, in common stock of the Parent or a special OPP type of LTIP Units (the “OPP LTIP Units”) that represents restricted operating partnership units in the Operating Partnership. If the performance criteria are not met, the participation points and the OPP LTIP Units will be forfeited. At December 31, 2015, all awards are equity classified.
The following table details the assumptions of each grant based on the year it was granted (dollars in thousands):
Risk free interest rate
0.86
0.67
Expected volatility
Aggregate fair value
26,500
23,100
23,900
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the performance criteria were not met for the 2012 and 2013 grant, respectively, therefore, no awards were earned and the points and OPP LTIP Units for the 2012 – 2014 and the 2013 – 2015 performance periods were forfeited. As the OPP has market-based performance criteria, the expense recognized is not adjusted if no awards were earned.
Prologis Promote Plan (“PPP”)
Under the PPP, we established a compensation pool equal to 40% of the aggregate promotes earned by Prologis under agreements with our co-investment ventures, representing the third-party portion. The awards may be settled in some combination of cash or RSUs in accordance with the terms of the PPP and, starting in August 2014, participants may elect to receive LTIP Units in lieu of RSUs. The RSUs and LTIP Units have a three-year vesting period. At the beginning of each year, each participant is allocated a percentage of the total compensation pool for each applicable new co-investment venture. We record an accrual for the estimated cash portion of the PPP at the time the revenue is recognized and recognized the expense of the equity award during the vesting period.
A compensation pool was funded in each of the three years ended December 31 associated with promotes earned from our co-investment ventures, as discussed in Note 5. We accrued $4.7 million associated with the cash awards for the promotes earned in the fourth quarter of 2015. The equity awards will be granted in 2016 when the promote is received. The total value of the awards in 2014 was $11.3 million, of which $4.2 million was paid in cash and approximately 57,000 RSUs were issued with a grant date fair value of $2.4 million and approximately 113,000 LTIP Units were issued with a grant date fair value of $4.7 million. The total value of the awards in 2013 was $5.3 million, of which $2.7 million was paid in cash and approximately 69,000 RSUs were issued with a grant date fair value of $2.6 million.
Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)
In addition to the RSU’s granted under the OPP and PPP, we grant RSUs to certain employees, generally on an annual basis. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of common stock of the Parent and generally vests over a continued service period. The RSUs earn cash dividends during the vesting period and are, therefore, considered participating securities. We charge the value of the dividend to retained earnings. The fair value of the RSU is generally based on the market price of the Parent’s common stock on the date the award is granted and is charged to compensation expense during the vesting period, which is generally three years.
The following table summarizes the activity for RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2015 (units in thousands):
Number of RSUs
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Number of RSUs Vested
Balance at January 1, 2015
2,521
39.38
106
Granted
693
44.52
Vested and distributed
(1,029
38.24
Transferred to LTIP Units
(522
39.27
Forfeited
(37
42.00
1,626
42.21
109
Total remaining compensation cost related to RSUs outstanding at December 31, 2015, was $34.6 million, prior to adjustments for capitalized amounts due to our development and leasing activities. The remaining compensation cost will be recognized through 2019, with a weighted average period of 1.4 years.
Operating Partnership Long-Term Incentive Plan Units
LTIP Units are valued based on the market price of the Parent’s common stock on the date the award is granted and generally vest ratably over three years. Distributions are paid with respect to the LTIP Units during the vesting period and, therefore, such LTIP Units are considered participating securities. The value of the distribution is charged to Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest in the Operating Partnership.
The following table summarizes the activity for LTIP Units for the year ended December 31, 2015 (units in thousands):
Number of LTIP Units
Number of LTIP Units Vested
41.43
609
44.88
Transferred from RSUs
522
1,244
71
Total remaining compensation cost related to LTIP Units at December 31, 2015, was $26.6 million, prior to adjustments for capitalized amounts due to our development and leasing activities. The remaining compensation cost will be recognized through 2018, with a weighted average period of 1.5 years.
In 2014, certain participants of the 2012 LTIP were offered the election to exchange outstanding but unvested full value awards for LTIP Units, which exchange was completed in January 2015. In addition, in 2014, certain participants were offered an election to receive grants of LTIP Units in lieu of future grants of RSUs under the 2012 LTIP and PPP. The LTIP Units issued pursuant to such elections will generally have the same vesting period and grant date fair value as the RSUs issuable under such awards.
OPP LTIP Units
As mentioned above in OPP, beginning in 2014, participants in the OPP were offered the election to exchange their previously granted participation points into OPP LTIP Units. In such election, participation points were exchanged into OPP LTIP Units with respect to outstanding performance periods. OPP LTIP Units are therefore not considered a participating security.
At December 31, 2015, the outstanding OPP LTIP Units were related to the 2014 – 2016 and 2015 – 2017 performance periods. The following table summarizes the activity for the OPP LTIP Units for the year ended December 31, 2015 (units in thousands):
Number of OPP LTIP Units
2,799
1,572
(907
3,464
Stock Options
We have 4.4 million stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2015 with a weighted average exercise price of $34.69 and a weighted average life of 3.1 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of exercised options was $13.7 million, $5.8 million, and $9.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. No stock options were granted in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015.
Other Plans
The Prologis 401(k) Plan ( the “401(k) Plan”) provides for matching employer contributions of $0.50 for every dollar contributed by an employee, up to 6% of the employee’s annual compensation (within the statutory compensation limit). In the 401(k) Plan, vesting in the matching employer contributions is based on the employee’s years of service, with 100% vesting at the completion of one year of service. Our contributions under the matching provisions were $2.5 million, $2.2 million and $2.1 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
We have a non-qualified savings plan that allows highly compensated employees the opportunity to defer the receipt and income taxation of a certain portion of their compensation in excess of the amount permitted under the 401(k) Plan. There has been no employer matching in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015.
Note 14. Income Taxes
Components of Earnings Before Income Taxes
The following table summarizes the components of earnings before income taxes for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Domestic
511,025
390,874
(404,910
International
437,580
322,754
741,172
Summary of Current and Deferred Income Taxes
The following table summarizes the components of the provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
United States federal
(11,633
(6,585
20,009
27,494
52,155
99,478
State and local
12,286
16,014
8,501
Total current tax expense
28,147
61,584
127,988
(810
(27,374
(1,133
(4,247
(59,866
(18,934
Total deferred tax benefit
Total income tax expense (benefit), included in continuing and discontinued operations
107,921
Current Income Taxes
As discussed in Note 4, contributions to our co-investment ventures were not significant during 2015, as such there was a limited impact on current income tax expense. Current income tax expense during 2014 is principally due to taxes triggered upon the contribution of the initial portfolio of properties of certain wholly-owned and AFORES entities to FIBRA Prologis. Current income tax expense during 2015 and 2014 was netted against a current benefit recognized during each year as a result of the operating losses generated by our U.S. TRS. Current income tax expense in 2013 was due to the net tax expense recognized on the initial contribution of properties to PELP and NPR that were previously held in certain foreign jurisdictions and U.S. TRSs.
For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we recognized a net expense of $3.0 million and a net benefit of $1.1 million and $1.8 million for uncertain tax positions, respectively.
During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds, was $24.1 million, $105.4 million and $99.5 million, respectively.
Deferred Income Taxes
The deferred income tax benefits recognized in 2015, 2014 and 2013 were primarily due to the reversal of deferred tax liabilities from the contribution and dispositions of properties. The deferred tax liabilities were originally recorded at the time of acquisition. The majority of the deferred tax benefit we recognized in 2014 was due to the reversal of deferred tax liabilities in connection with the initial contribution of properties to FIBRA Prologis and due to the expiration of the holding period on properties previously acquired with existing built-in-gains. The deferred tax benefit in 2013 related to the contribution of properties to PELP.
The following table summarizes the deferred income tax assets and liabilities at December 31 (in thousands):
Gross deferred income tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards (1)
321,144
346,978
Basis difference – real estate properties
89,856
105,205
Basis difference – equity investments
11,242
12,401
Basis difference – intangibles
4,351
5,952
Section 163(j) interest limitation
32,684
32,703
Capital loss carryforward
25,282
Other – temporary differences
8,993
10,701
Total gross deferred income tax assets
493,552
539,222
Valuation allowance
(467,440
(518,241
Gross deferred income tax assets, net of valuation allowance
26,112
20,981
Gross deferred income tax liabilities:
82,160
89,998
6,170
7,324
993
716
Total gross deferred income tax liabilities
89,323
98,038
Net deferred income tax liabilities
63,211
77,057
At December 31, 2015, we had NOL carryforwards as follows (in thousands):
United States
Mexico
Gross NOL carryforward
97,295
635,970
266,600
132,672
55,351
Tax-effected NOL carryforward
36,515
163,974
83,612
23,511
13,532
(36,515
(151,811
(83,612
(23,511
(13,532
Net deferred tax asset – NOL carryforward
12,163
Expiration periods
2022 – 2035
2016 – indefinite
2016 – 2026
2016 – 2024
The deferred tax asset valuation allowance at December 31, 2015 is adequate to reduce the total deferred tax asset to an amount that we estimate will more likely than not be realized.
Liability for Uncertain Tax Positions
During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we believe that we have complied with the REIT requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. The statute of limitations for our tax returns is generally three years. As such, our tax returns that remain subject to examination would be primarily from 2012 and thereafter.
The liability for uncertain tax positions principally consisted of estimated federal income tax liabilities and included accrued interest and penalties of $0.3 million at December 31, 2015 and 2014 and $0.9 million at December 31, 2013. A reconciliation of the liability for uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in thousands):
Balance at January 1
256
1,318
7,943
Additions for tax positions taken during current year
3,000
Additions for tax positions taken during a prior year
405
Settlements with taxing authorities
(7,030
Reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations
(1,318
Balance at December 31
3,264
Note 15. Earnings Per Common Share or Unit
We determine basic earnings per share or unit based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock or units outstanding during the period. We compute diluted earnings per share or unit based on the weighted average number of shares or units outstanding combined with the incremental weighted average effect from all outstanding potentially dilutive instruments.
The following table computes our basic and diluted earnings per share and unit for the years ended December 31 (in thousands, except per share and unit amounts):
Net earnings attributable to common stockholders – Basic
Net earnings attributable to exchangeable limited partnership units (1)
13,120
3,636
1,305
Gains, net of expenses, associated with exchangeable debt assumed exchanged (2)
(1,614
Adjusted net earnings attributable to common stockholders – Diluted
874,294
625,871
316,727
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic (3)
Incremental weighted average effect on exchange of limited partnership units (1)
8,569
2,060
Incremental weighted average effect of equity awards and warrant
3,307
3,410
Incremental weighted average effect on exchangeable debt assumed exchanged (2)
2,173
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted (4)
Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders:
Basic
Diluted
Net earnings attributable to common and Class A unitholders
Net earnings attributable to Class A convertible common unitholders
(3,393
Net earnings attributable to common unitholders – Basic
870,521
Net earnings attributable to exchangeable limited partnership units
1,994
1,435
97
Gain, net of expenses, associated with exchangeable debt assumed exchanged (2)
Adjusted net earnings attributable to common unitholders – Diluted
Weighted average common partnership units outstanding – Basic (3)
Incremental weighted average effect on exchange of Class A convertible units
2,050
Incremental weighted average effect on exchange of limited partnership units
1,848
1,735
200
Incremental weighted average effect of equity awards and warrant of Prologis, Inc.
Weighted average common partnership units outstanding – Diluted (4)
Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders:
Earnings allocated to the exchangeable Operating Partnership units not held by the Parent have been included in the numerator and exchangeable Operating Partnership units have been included in the denominator for the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share for all periods as the per share and unit amount is the same. The incremental weighted average exchangeable Operating Partnership units were 4,671, 1,766 and 1,860 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
In March 2015, the exchangeable debt was settled primarily through the issuance of common stock. The adjustment in 2015 assumes the exchange occurred on January 1, 2015.
The increase in shares and units between the periods is primarily due to the warrant NBIM exercised in December 2014, the ATM program activity in late 2014 and early 2015 and the conversion of exchangeable debt to shares and units in March 2015.
Our total potentially dilutive shares and units outstanding consisted of the following:
Total weighted average potentially dilutive limited partnership units
3,898
1,932
1,558
Total potentially dilutive stock awards and warrant
7,299
14,366
13,998
Total weighted average potentially dilutive shares and units from exchangeable debt
11,879
74
Note 16. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to global market risks, including the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. To manage these risks, we may enter into various derivative contracts, such as foreign currency contracts to manage foreign currency exposure, and interest rate swaps to manage the effect of interest rate fluctuations.
See Note 2 for additional information about our derivative financial instrument policy.
We did not record any ineffectiveness on our foreign currency derivative contracts during 2015, 2014 and 2013. Losses in Interest Expense due to hedge ineffectiveness on our interest rate derivative contracts were not considered material during 2015, 2014 or 2013.
The following table summarizes the activity in our foreign currency contracts for the years ended December 31 (in millions, except for weighted average forward rates and number of active contracts):
Net Investment Forward Contracts
Forward and Option Contracts
Local Currency
EUR
GBP
EUR (1)
GBP (1) (2)
JPY (1)
Other (1)
Notional amounts at January 1
24,136
284
New contracts
118
43,373
394
333
18,740
Matured or expired contracts
(300
(118
(67,509
(394
(342
(102
(5,900
Notional amounts at December 31
12,840
U.S. Dollar
250
354
186
298
375
159
(400
(200
(603
(298
(419
(152
(50
(21
386
310
148
Weighted average forward
rate at December 31
1.62
1.13
1.31
118.23
Active contracts at December 31
Forward and Option Contracts (1)
600
1,746
79,010
365
(2,046
(79,010
(1,000
800
1,304
2,354
769
464
(2,754
(769
(110
(1,304
During 2015 and 2014, we exercised 32 and 3 option contracts and realized gains of $14.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses) and Related Amortization, Net.
Included in our British pounds sterling denominated option contracts are three forward contracts to sell British pounds sterling and buy euros. These forwards have a notional amount of £16.0 million (€21.5 million) and were reported in this table using a weighted average exchange rate of $1.09 U.S. dollars to the euro.
The following table summarizes the activity in our interest rate swaps for the years ended December 31 (in millions, except for the number of active contracts):
398
1,315
New contracts (2) (3)
1,396
Matured or expired contracts (3) (4)
(360
(71
(1,244
We had seven interest rate swaps hedges outstanding at December 31, 2015.
During 2015, we entered into two contracts with a notional amount of $526.3 million (¥65.0 billion) on the 2015 Yen Term Loan and three contracts with a notional amount of CAD $371.9 million ($510.0 million) on the Canadian Term Loan to effectively fix the interest rates. During 2014, we entered into two contracts with a notional amount of $398.3 million (¥40.9 billion) to effectively fix the interest rate on the 2014 Yen Term Loan. See Note 9 for more information on the 2015 Yen Term Loan.
In the third quarter of 2015, we entered into two contracts with a notional amount of $360.0 million to effectively fix the interest rate at the three month LIBOR rate of 2.3% on expected future debt issuances. These contracts were designated as interest rate forward hedges. These contracts were settled in the fourth quarter of 2015 when we entered into the $750.0 million of senior notes. We recorded a loss of $11.0 million associated with these derivatives that will be amortized to Interest Expense, in accordance with our policy.
During 2013, we settled 13 contracts with a notional value of $333.5 million, and contributed 13 contracts with a notional value of $383.9 million related to the transfer of assets to the newly formed PELP co-investment venture. We also settled five contracts in Japan with a notional value of $526.4 million in connection with the contributions of properties to NPR.
The following table presents the fair value of our derivative instruments at December 31 (in thousands):
Asset
Liability
Net investment hedges – euro denominated (1)
22,891
Net investment hedges – pound sterling denominated
33,471
29,097
Net investment hedges – yen denominated (1)
46,934
Cash flow hedge foreign currency options – peso denominated
Foreign currency options – Canadian dollar denominated (2)
3,324
Foreign currency options – euro denominated (2)
11,711
7,742
Foreign currency options – pound sterling denominated (2)
4,241
745
Foreign currency options – yen denominated (2)
832
717
Interest rate hedges
1,395
Total fair value of derivatives
During the second quarter of 2015, we terminated our euro and yen denominated net investment hedges. See below for additional information about the gains recognized upon termination.
As discussed above, these foreign currency options are not designated as hedges. We recognized gains of $22.1 million and $7.7 million in Foreign Currency and Derivative Losses and Related Amortization, Net from the change in value of our outstanding foreign currency option contracts for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The change in Other Comprehensive Income in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income during the periods presented is due to the translation on consolidation of the financial statements into U.S. dollars of our consolidated subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar for which we recorded losses of $594.0 million, $614.8 million and $237.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. It also includes the change in fair value for the effective portion of our derivative and nonderivative instruments. The following table presents the gains and (losses) associated with the change in fair value for the effective portion of our derivative and nonderivative instruments included in Other Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Derivative net investment hedges (1)
63,934
122,164
17,847
Interest rate hedges (2)
(21,602
(804
(69
Cash flow hedges
(112
Our share of derivatives from unconsolidated co-investment ventures
4,257
(5,694
19,659
Total gain on derivative instruments
46,477
115,666
37,437
Nonderivative net investment hedges (3)
321,148
321,196
(14,910
Total gain on derivative and nonderivative hedging instruments
367,625
436,862
22,527
We received $128.2 million, $13.0 million and $7.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, on the settlement of net investment hedges.
The amounts reclassified to interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, were not considered significant. For the next 12 months from December 31, 2015, we estimate an additional expense of $5.6 million will be reclassified to Interest Expense.
At December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, we had €3.2 billion ($3.5 billion), €2.5 billion ($3.0 billion) and €700 million ($1.0 billion) of debt, net of accrued interest, respectively, designated as nonderivative financial instrument hedges of our net investment in international subsidiaries. We had €97.6 million ($118.5 million) of debt that was not designated as a nonderivative financial instrument hedge at December 31, 2014. We recognized unrealized gains of $10.0 million and $7.5 million in Foreign Currency and Derivative Gains (Losses) and Related Amortization, Net on the unhedged portion of our debt for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Fair Value Measurements
We have estimated the fair value of our financial instruments using available market information and valuation methodologies we believe to be appropriate for these purposes. Considerable judgment and a high degree of subjectivity are involved in developing these estimates and, accordingly, they are not necessarily indicative of amounts that we would realize on disposition. See Note 2 for more information on our fair value measurements policy.
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, other than the derivatives discussed previously and the embedded derivative discussed in Note 9, we did not have any significant financial assets or financial liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the Consolidated Financial Statements. All of our derivatives held at December 31, 2015 and 2014, were classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Fair Value Measurements on Nonrecurring Basis
No assets met the criteria to be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2015 or 2014.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the carrying amounts of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.
The differences in the fair value of our debt from the carrying value in the table below are the result of differences in interest rates or borrowing spreads that were available to us at December 31, 2015 and 2014, as compared with those in effect when the debt was issued or assumed, including reduced borrowing spreads due to our improved credit ratings. The senior notes and many of the issues of secured mortgage debt contain pre-payment penalties or yield maintenance provisions that could make the cost of refinancing the debt at lower rates exceed the benefit that would be derived from doing so.
The following table reflects the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our debt at December 31 (in thousands):
Carrying Value
Fair Value
Senior notes
6,801,118
6,593,657
Exchangeable senior notes
511,931
Term loans and other debt
2,115,457
2,128,270
584,124
591,810
Secured mortgage debt
1,262,778
1,173,488
Secured mortgage debt of consolidated entities
1,825,361
1,209,271
Total debt
12,017,527
10,080,157
Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies
A majority of the properties we acquire, including land, are subjected to environmental reviews either by us or the previous owners. In addition, we may incur environmental remediation costs associated with certain land parcels we acquire in connection with the development of the land. We have acquired certain properties that may have been leased to or previously owned by companies that discharged hazardous materials. We establish a liability at the time of acquisition to cover such costs and adjust the liabilities as appropriate when additional information becomes available. We record our environmental liabilities in Other Liabilities. We purchase various environmental insurance policies to mitigate our exposure to environmental liabilities. We are not aware of any environmental liabilities that would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Indemnification Agreements
We may enter into agreements whereby we indemnify certain co-investment ventures, or our venture partners, outside of the U.S. for taxes that may be assessed with respect to certain properties we contributed to these ventures. Our contributions to these ventures are generally structured as contributions of shares of companies that own the real estate assets. Accordingly, the capital gains associated with the step up in the value of the underlying real estate assets, for tax purposes, are deferred and transferred at contribution. We have generally indemnified these ventures to the extent that the ventures: (i) incur capital gains or withholding tax as a result of a direct sale of the real estate asset, as opposed to a transaction in which the shares of the company owning the real estate asset are transferred or sold or (ii) are required to grant a discount to the buyer of shares under a share transfer transaction as a result of the ventures transferring the embedded capital gain tax liability to the buyer of the shares in the transaction. The agreements limit the amount that is subject to our indemnification with respect to each property to 100% of the actual tax liabilities related to the capital gains that are deferred and transferred by us to the ventures at the time of the initial contribution less any deferred tax assets transferred with the property.
The outcome under these agreements is uncertain as it depends on the method and timing of dissolution of the related venture or disposition of any properties by the venture. We record liabilities related to the indemnification agreements in Other Liabilities. We continue to monitor these agreements and the likelihood of the sale of assets that would result in recognition and will adjust the potential liability in the future as facts and circumstances dictate.
Off-Balance Sheet Liabilities
We have issued performance and surety bonds and standby letters of credit in connection with certain development projects. Performance and surety bonds are commonly required by public agencies from real estate developers. Performance and surety bonds are renewable and expire on the completion of the improvements and infrastructure. At December 31, 2015, and 2014 we had approximately $58.8 million and $54.5 million, respectively, outstanding under such arrangements.
We may be required under capital commitments or we may choose to make additional capital contributions to certain of our unconsolidated entities, representing our proportionate ownership interest, should additional capital contributions be necessary to fund development or acquisition costs, repayment of debt or operation shortfalls. See Note 5 for further discussion related to equity commitments to our unconsolidated entities.
Litigation
From time to time, we are party to a variety of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that, with respect to any such matters that we are currently a party to, the ultimate disposition of any such matter will not have material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
Note 18. Business Segments
Our current business strategy includes two operating segments: Real Estate Operations and Strategic Capital. We generate revenues, earnings, net operating income and cash flows through our segments, as follows:
Real Estate Operations. This operating segment represents the ownership of industrial operating properties and is the main source of our revenue and earnings. We collect rent from our customers through operating leases, including reimbursements for the majority of our property operating costs. Each operating property is considered to be an individual operating segment with similar economic characteristics; these properties are combined within the reportable segment based on geographic location. Our Real Estate Operations segment also includes development, re-development and acquisition activities that lead to rental operations. We develop, redevelop and acquire industrial properties primarily in global and regional markets to meet our customers’ needs. Within this line of business, we capitalize on the following: (i) the land that we currently own; (ii) the development expertise of our local teams; (iii) our global customer relationships; and (iv) the demand for high-quality distribution facilities. Land held for development, properties currently under development and land we own and lease to customers under ground leases are included in this segment.
Strategic Capital. This operating segment represents the management of unconsolidated co-investment ventures. We invest with partners and investors through our ventures, both private and public. We tailor industrial portfolios to investors’ specific needs and deploy capital with a focus on larger ventures with longer duration and open-ended funds with leading global institutions. These private and public vehicles provide capital for distinct geographies across our global platform. We hold a significant ownership interest in these ventures, which we believe aligns our interests with those of our partners. We generate strategic capital revenues from our unconsolidated co-investment ventures through asset management and property management services and we earn additional revenues by providing leasing, acquisition, construction, development, financing and disposition services. Depending on the structure of the venture and the returns provided to our partners, we also earn revenues through promotes during the life of a venture or upon liquidation. Each unconsolidated co-investment venture we manage is considered to be an individual operating segment with similar economic characteristics; these ventures are combined within the reportable segment based on geographic location.
Reconciliations are presented below for: (i) each reportable business segment’s revenue from external customers to Total Revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Income; (ii) each reportable business segment’s net operating income from external customers to Earnings Before Income Taxes; and (iii) each reportable business segment’s assets to Total Assets. Our chief operating decision makers rely primarily on net operating income and similar measures to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing segment performance. The applicable components of Total Revenues, Earnings Before Income Taxes and Total Assets are allocated to each reportable business segment’s revenues, net operating income and assets. Items that are not directly assignable to a segment, such as certain corporate income and expenses, are not allocated but reflected as reconciling items. The following reconciliations are presented in thousands:
Revenues (1):
Real estate operations:
1,859,393
1,403,564
1,288,925
69,527
74,413
174,397
57,792
62,939
107,692
Total Real Estate Operations segment
1,986,712
1,540,916
1,571,014
Strategic capital:
61,684
95,168
72,474
112,793
86,549
35,885
38,154
43,204
Total Strategic Capital segment
Net operating income:
1,296,387
1,000,773
899,053
39,672
40,627
116,178
40,741
45,262
76,863
1,376,800
1,086,662
1,092,094
14,215
42,042
18,785
86,725
57,266
41,263
21,004
24,067
30,145
121,944
123,375
90,193
Total segment net operating income
1,498,744
1,210,037
1,182,287
Reconciling items:
General and administrative expenses
(238,199
(247,768
(229,207
Depreciation and amortization expenses
(880,373
(642,461
(648,668
Total reconciling items
(550,139
(496,409
(846,025
Assets (2):
22,949,838
17,432,909
1,291,991
1,820,529
1,157,401
926,645
25,399,230
20,180,083
Strategic capital (3):
19,363
20,635
49,960
54,577
2,005
2,718
71,328
77,930
Total segment assets
25,470,558
20,258,013
291,036
297,638
5,924,209
5,516,988
79
Includes revenues attributable to the United States for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 of $1.9 billion, $1.4 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.
Includes long-lived assets attributable to the United States at December 31, 2015, and 2014 of $23.2 billion and $17.3 billion, respectively.
Represents management contracts and goodwill recorded in connection with business combinations associated with the Strategic Capital segment. Goodwill was $25.3 million at December 31, 2015, and 2014.
Note 19. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Significant noncash investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:
See Notes 3, 9 and 12 for information related to the KTR acquisition.
In the fourth quarter of 2015, we assumed $290.7 million of secured mortgage debt in connection with the acquisition of real estate properties. Also, as partial consideration for the disposition of some properties acquired in the fourth quarter 2015, the buyer assumed debt of $170.1 million.
Common limited partnership units were issued as partial consideration for the acquisition of properties as disclosed in Note 12.
During the second quarter of 2015, we received $65.3 million of equity in certain unconsolidated entities as a portion of our proceeds from the contribution of properties to these entities. During 2013, we received $31.2 million, representing ownership interests in certain unconsolidated entities as a portion of our proceeds from the contribution of properties to these entities, excluding PELP.
We received notes backed by real estate in 2015 as disclosed in Note 7.
Holders of our exchangeable senior notes exchanged the majority of their notes into common stock of the Parent in 2015 as disclosed in Note 9.
We capitalized $22.7 million, $21.6 million and $18.8 million of equity-based compensation expense resulting from our development and leasing activities during 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
As partial consideration for properties we contributed to FIBRA Prologis and the conclusion of an unconsolidated co-investment venture during the second quarter of 2014, we received equity valued at $609.7 million and FIBRA Prologis assumed $345.1 million of secured debt. See Note 4 for additional information about this transaction. In 2013, as partial consideration for contributions and dispositions, the buyers assumed debt of $194.9 million.
As partial consideration for properties we contributed to PELP during the first quarter of 2013, we received equity initially valued at $1.3 billion, representing our 50% ownership interest, and PELP assumed $353.2 million of secured mortgage debt.
See Note 3 for information related to acquisitions of controlling interests in our unconsolidated co-investment ventures in 2014 and 2013.
Note 20. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following table details our selected quarterly data (in thousands, except per share and unit data):
Three Months Ended,
2015:
462,847
510,404
580,622
643,201
83,881
87,348
103,392
105,551
351,312
140,260
307,186
126,757
345,206
140,240
258,979
118,363
Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders – Basic (1)
0.27
0.49
0.23
Net earnings per share attributable to common stockholders – Diluted (1) (2)
2014:
434,682
460,089
415,151
450,865
71,466
95,274
78,112
74,956
12,003
152,430
147,127
427,724
72,715
136,245
408,609
0.01
0.15
0.82
0.13
0.81
346,488
141,538
262,155
123,733
Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders – Basic (1)
Net earnings per unit attributable to common unitholders – Diluted (1) (2)
4,683
72,973
136,738
410,042
Quarterly earnings per common share or unit amounts may not total to the annual amounts due to rounding and the changes in the number of weighted common shares or units outstanding included in the calculation of basic and diluted shares or units.
Income allocated to the exchangeable Operating Partnership units not held by the Parent has been included in the numerator and exchangeable Operating Partnership units have been included in the denominator for the purpose of computing diluted earnings per share for all periods since the per share and unit is the same.
Under date of February 19, 2016, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related financial statement schedule, Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Schedule III). Schedule III is the responsibility of Prologis, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Schedule III based on our audits.
In our opinion, Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
Under date of February 19, 2016, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of Prologis, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2015. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related financial statement schedule, Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation (Schedule III). Schedule III is the responsibility of Prologis, L.P.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Schedule III based on our audits.
83
SCHEDULE III – REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2015
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, as applicable)
Initial Cost to
Costs
Capitalized
Gross Amounts at Which Carried
at December 31, 2015
No. of Bldgs.
Encum-
brances
Building &
Improvements
Subsequent
to
Acquisition
(a,b)
Depreciation
(c)
Date of
Construction/
Industrial Operating Properties (d)
North American Markets
Atlanta, Georgia
Atlanta Airport Distribution Center
(d)
4,759
13,591
958
14,549
19,308
(696
2014, 2015
Atlanta NE at Sugarloaf
620
2,536
3,156
(115
Atlanta NE Distribution Center
5,582
3,047
30,949
6,276
33,302
39,578
(19,045
1996, 1997
Atlanta South Business Park
5,353
28,895
3,526
32,421
37,774
(5,398
2011
Atlanta West Distribution Center
14,335
48,290
10,362
58,652
72,987
(13,248
1994, 2006, 2012, 2015
Berkeley Lake Distribution Center
2,046
8,712
9,916
11,962
(2,331
2006
Breckenridge Distribution Center
1,645
6,627
6,659
8,304
(303
Buford Distribution Center
2,659
8,847
5,984
14,831
17,490
(1,628
2007, 2015
Carter-Pacific Business Center
1,484
5,965
6,113
7,597
(381
Cobb Place Distribution Center
2,970
12,702
342
13,044
(1,914
Douglas Hill Distribution Center
11,599
46,826
4,383
11,677
51,131
62,808
(17,388
2005
Hartsfield East Distribution Center
697
6,466
327
6,793
7,490
(910
Horizon Distribution Center
7,364
36,015
1,545
37,560
44,924
(3,582
2006, 2015
Midland Distribution Center
1,919
7,679
1,521
9,200
11,119
(3,031
Northeast Industrial Center
2,821
12,176
1,687
13,863
16,684
(2,206
Northmont Industrial Center
566
3,209
1,709
4,918
5,484
(3,430
1994
Olympic Industrial Center
2,156
8,941
9,013
11,169
(592
Park I-75 South
11,393
18,808
35,394
11,406
54,189
65,595
(2,969
2013, 2015
Park I-85
6,391
11,585
25,946
37,531
43,922
(243
Peachtree Corners Business Center
5,750
20,670
3,376
24,046
29,796
(5,473
1994, 2015
Piedmont Ct. Distribution Center
885
5,013
4,181
9,194
10,079
(6,085
1997
Riverside Distribution Center (ATL)
3,306
16,600
4,422
3,329
20,999
24,328
(10,463
1999, 2014
Royal 85 Industrial Center
16,859
17,083
20,389
(407
Savannah Logistics Center
5,114
46,844
46,847
51,961
Southfield-KRDC Industrial SG
1,551
8,621
491
9,112
10,663
(2,200
Southside Distribution Center
1,186
2,859
589
3,448
4,634
(768
Suwanee Creek Distribution Center
1,045
4,201
263
4,464
5,509
(612
2010, 2013
Tradeport Distribution Center
1,464
4,563
9,595
1,479
14,143
15,622
(8,348
1994, 1996
Weaver Distribution Center
935
5,182
2,439
7,621
8,556
(5,488
1995
Westfork Industrial Center
6,795
23,292
556
6,796
23,847
30,643
(3,440
1995, 2015
Westgate Industrial Center
5,620
234
5,854
7,131
(1,035
118,973
451,204
152,499
119,797
602,879
(124,748
Austin, Texas
Corridor Park Corporate Center
4,579
18,358
18,862
23,441
(816
MET 4-12 LTD
4,300
20,456
294
20,750
25,050
(3,425
MET PHASE 1 95 LTD
5,593
17,211
1,415
18,626
24,219
(3,222
Montopolis Distribution Center
580
3,384
2,607
5,991
6,571
(4,570
Riverside Distribution Center (AUS)
1,849
7,195
9,044
(166
Southpark Corporate Center
1,470
5,834
5,838
7,308
(258
Walnut Creek Corporate Center
11,152
46,510
1,299
11,206
47,755
58,961
(5,247
1994, 2014
29,523
118,948
6,123
29,577
125,017
(17,704
Baltimore/Washington DC
1901 Park 100 Drive
2,409
7,227
8,405
10,814
(2,961
Airport Commons Distribution Center
2,320
10,573
2,360
10,533
12,893
(5,064
Beltway Distribution
9,211
33,922
508
34,430
43,641
(5,765
BWI Cargo Center E
10,725
10,840
(5,887
Corcorde Industrial Center
8,717
5,038
13,755
15,293
(9,380
Corridor Industrial Center
1,921
7,224
7,247
9,168
(1,249
Crysen Industrial Center
2,285
6,267
488
6,755
9,040
(1,307
Gateway Business Center
30,263
25,117
38,117
30,612
62,885
93,497
(2,921
2012, 2014
Gateway Distribution Center
2,523
5,715
4,862
3,163
9,937
13,100
(2,886
1998, 2012
Granite Hill Distribution Center
2,959
9,344
9,418
12,377
(1,991
Greenwood Industrial
6,828
24,253
26,704
33,532
(4,360
Hampton Central Distribution Center
8,928
26,787
788
27,575
36,503
(1,192
IAD Cargo Center 5
43,060
43,135
(32,308
Meadowridge Distribution Center
7,827
18,076
8,140
7,972
26,071
34,043
(3,967
1998, 2014
Meadowridge Industrial
4,845
20,576
4,161
24,737
29,582
(3,782
Patuxent Range Road
2,281
9,638
1,589
11,227
13,508
(1,974
Preston Court
2,326
10,146
331
10,477
12,803
(1,772
ProLogis Park - Dulles
16,703
35,291
613
35,904
52,607
(3,513
Troy Hill Distribution Center
9,179
30,415
189
30,604
39,783
(2,408
White Marsh Distribution Center
4,714
8,609
13,323
(51
119,060
341,109
79,313
120,234
419,248
(94,738
Boston, Massachusetts
Windsor Distribution Center
15,368
75,426
5,828
81,254
96,622
(1,221
Carlisle Distribution Center
78,652
328,514
6,805
335,319
413,971
(26,840
2012, 2013, 2015
Chambersburg Distribution Center
4,188
17,796
138
17,934
22,122
(1,598
Harrisburg Distribution Center
30,801
122,169
3,358
125,527
156,328
(13,480
2004, 2013, 2015
Harrisburg Industrial Center
782
6,190
1,741
7,931
8,713
(3,494
2002
I-78 Distribution Center
13,030
30,007
419
30,426
43,456
(4,708
I-81 Distribution Center
1,822
21,583
21,960
23,782
(3,317
Kraft Distribution Center
7,450
22,457
22,477
29,927
(1,027
Lehigh Valley Distribution Center
26,795
88,519
24,824
26,875
113,263
140,138
(12,280
2004, 2010, 2013, 2014
Northport Industrial Center
12,282
37,910
50,192
(1,751
Park 33 Distribution Center
28,947
47,081
41,255
31,231
86,052
117,283
(9,063
2007, 2014
PHL Cargo Center C2
11,966
12,022
(5,536
Quakertown Distribution Center
6,966
27,488
34,454
(6,668
211,715
734,192
106,481
214,079
838,309
1,052,388
(89,762
Central Valley, California
Arch Road Logistics Center
9,492
38,060
2,310
40,370
49,862
(7,210
2010
Central Valley Distribution Center
5,339
31,007
31,839
37,178
(1,504
Central Valley Industrial Center
14,110
64,141
8,861
14,560
72,552
87,112
(28,553
1999, 2002, 2005, 2014
Chabot Commerce Center
5,222
13,697
7,708
21,405
26,627
(4,797
Duck Creek Distribution Center
6,690
37,858
44,548
(1,668
Manteca Distribution Center
9,280
27,840
598
9,480
28,238
37,718
(9,704
Patterson Pass Business Center
10,004
27,640
7,413
10,017
35,040
45,057
(5,349
2007, 2012, 2014
Tracy Distribution Center
2,056
11,789
13,454
15,510
(528
Tracy II Distribution Center
23,905
32,080
152,263
29,246
179,002
208,248
(25,323
2007, 2009, 2012, 2013
86,098
284,112
181,650
92,102
459,758
(84,636
Charlotte, North Carolina
Charlotte Distribution Center
6,596
8,206
29,277
8,114
35,965
44,079
(16,925
1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2014
Northpark Distribution Center
1,183
6,707
3,020
1,184
9,726
10,910
(6,664
1994, 1998
West Pointe Business Center
12,138
39,809
10,194
50,003
62,141
(6,681
2006, 2012, 2014
19,917
54,722
42,491
21,436
95,694
(30,270
Chicago, Illinois
Addison Business Center
2,907
515
4,715
(661
Addison Distribution Center
2,594
11,779
2,142
13,921
16,515
(3,442
1997, 2015
Alsip Distribution Center
6,311
18,719
9,489
6,619
27,900
34,519
(13,004
Alsip Industrial Center
2,336
2,383
3,805
(864
Arlington Heights Distribution Center
5,263
10,361
2,568
5,264
12,928
18,192
(2,072
Aurora Distribution Center
9,921
53,571
53,679
63,600
(1,790
Bedford Park Distribution Center
3,014
9,271
293
9,564
12,578
(261
Bensenville Distribution Center
3,842
6,370
940
10,198
11,138
(7,487
Bensenville Industrial Park
43,455
111,007
7,923
118,930
162,385
(19,777
2011, 2015
Bloomingdale 100 Business Center
6,563
26,145
1,447
27,592
34,155
(1,173
Bolingbrook Distribution Center
42,742
169,183
23,549
192,732
235,474
(32,692
1999, 2006, 2014, 2015
Bridgeview Distribution Center
6,882
6,950
8,612
(483
Bridgeview Industrial Center
1,380
3,404
949
1,488
4,245
5,733
(808
Chicago Industrial Center Portfolio
1,330
2,876
422
3,298
4,628
(755
Cicero Distribution Center
3,789
5,819
5,873
9,662
(285
Des Plaines Distribution Center
8,956
22,446
7,278
8,957
29,723
38,680
(13,690
1995, 1996, 2015
Elgin Distribution Center
2,480
6,422
446
6,868
9,348
(132
Elk Grove Distribution Center
39,769
90,757
50,195
140,952
180,721
(50,797
1995, 1996, 1997, 1999, 2006, 2009, 2015
Elk Grove Du Page
14,830
64,408
11,952
76,360
91,190
(12,881
Elk Grove Village SG
5,856
11,049
1,163
12,212
18,068
(2,791
Elmhurst Distribution Center
2,575
7,306
1,314
2,576
8,619
11,195
(3,597
Executive Drive
1,371
6,430
684
7,114
8,485
(1,182
Franklin Park Distribution Center
22,998
49,906
49,929
72,927
(975
Glendale Heights Distribution Center
8,381
39,047
5,055
44,102
52,483
(15,761
1999, 2015
Grand Rapids Distribution Center
839
1,516
1,523
2,362
(30
Gurnee Distribution Center
4,650
14,958
338
15,296
19,946
(694
Hintz Building
1,970
2,097
I-294 Distribution Center
7,922
32,743
223
32,966
40,888
(3,158
I-55 Distribution Center
5,383
25,504
35,697
11,786
54,798
66,584
(16,669
2007
Itasca Distribution Center
1,522
7,119
1,915
9,034
10,556
(2,456
1996, 2014
Itasca Industrial Center Portfolio
1,713
3,812
246
4,058
5,771
(781
Kehoe Industrial Center
2,975
7,876
8,326
11,301
(710
Kennicott Park Distribution Center
811
2,996
3,003
3,814
(85
85
Kenosha Distribution Center
14,484
117,728
117,751
132,235
(1,952
Lake Zurich Distribution Center
1,913
8,107
10,020
(156
McCook Distribution Center
1,968
6,784
7,021
8,989
(122
Melrose Park Distribution Ctr.
12,201
37,144
543
37,687
49,888
(2,586
Minooka Distribution Center
18,420
67,250
18,225
19,404
84,491
103,895
(20,027
2005, 2008, 2014
Mitchell Distribution Center
1,236
10,846
12,082
(7,438
1996
Mount Pleasant Distribution Center
8,171
8,191
11,067
NDP - Chicago
1,362
1,402
1,863
(239
Nicholas Logistics Center
10,799
10,851
13,205
(2,238
Northbrook Distribution Center
8,227
3,891
12,118
14,174
(2,787
Northlake Distribution Center
5,387
15,674
816
16,490
21,877
(2,391
1996, 2015
OHare Industrial Center Portfolio
3,455
8,724
211
8,935
12,390
(1,963
Palatine Distribution Center
497
2,723
2,732
3,229
(80
Pleasant Prairie Distribution Center
3,293
16,321
2,352
18,673
21,966
(6,044
Remington Lakes Distribution
2,382
11,657
654
12,311
14,693
(1,792
Romeoville Distribution Center
31,257
121,385
11,020
132,405
163,662
(35,961
1999, 2005, 2015
S.C. Johnson & Son
2,267
15,911
1,552
3,152
16,578
19,730
(3,714
2008
Shiller Park Distribution Center
17,339
33,001
485
33,486
50,825
(859
Touhy Cargo Terminal
2,697
8,909
11,606
(1,240
Tower Distribution Center
1,279
1,280
3,330
Waukegan Distribution Center
4,368
17,632
1,095
18,727
23,095
(5,931
West Chicago Distribution Center
3,125
12,764
4,052
16,816
19,941
(5,491
2005, 2015
Willowbrook Distribution Center
3,134
3,136
3,991
(154
Windsor Court
635
3,493
214
3,707
4,342
(721
Wood Dale Industrial SG
4,343
10,174
923
11,097
15,440
(2,054
Woodale Distribution Center
1,490
574
2,064
2,327
(1,385
Woodridge Distribution Center
49,943
215,504
23,807
53,310
235,944
289,254
(74,110
2005, 2007, 2015
Yohan Industrial
4,219
12,306
1,291
13,597
17,816
(2,344
461,394
1,619,024
248,995
473,466
1,855,947
2,329,413
(396,271
Cincinnati, Ohio
Airpark Distribution Center
5,851
21,846
14,658
6,831
35,524
42,355
(9,082
1996, 2012, 2014
DAY Cargo Center
4,749
601
5,350
(1,931
Fairfield Commercial Center
2,526
10,110
10,172
12,698
(473
Monroe Park
7,222
29,606
478
30,084
37,306
(1,366
Mosteller Distribution Center
921
3,888
94
3,982
4,903
(203
Park I-275
15,939
61,886
3,531
65,417
81,356
(6,724
2008, 2012, 2014
Sharonville Distribution Center
1,202
15,122
2,424
13,900
16,324
(6,931
West Chester Commercial Park I
9,466
38,048
2,890
40,938
50,404
(2,710
43,127
170,133
37,436
45,329
205,367
(29,420
Columbus, Ohio
Alum Creek Distribution Center
37,823
38,462
43,324
(1,644
2012, 2015
Brookham Distribution Center
5,964
23,858
5,093
28,950
34,915
(11,343
Canal Pointe Distribution Center
1,237
7,013
2,199
9,169
10,449
(4,968
1999
Capital Park South Distribution Center
10,077
39,631
30,610
10,470
69,848
80,318
(21,246
Columbus West Industrial Center
427
2,407
2,877
(164
Corporate Park West
3,583
3,668
4,301
(175
Crosswinds Distribution Center
3,058
17,758
324
18,082
21,140
(888
Etna Distribution Center
5,840
33,734
606
34,340
40,180
(1,585
International Street Commercial Center
6,356
430
6,786
8,289
(1,020
South Park Distribution Center
3,343
15,182
18,646
21,989
(8,622
1999, 2005
Westpointe Distribution Center
1,446
7,601
1,553
9,154
10,600
(3,881
38,390
194,946
45,046
38,827
239,555
(55,536
Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas
Arlington Corp Center
9,380
41,744
41,955
51,335
(3,062
2012, 2014, 2015
Dallas Corporate Center
6,449
35,098
6,645
40,343
46,988
(19,755
1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2012
Dallas Industrial
7,180
26,514
3,287
29,801
36,981
(5,717
DFW Cargo Center 1
35,117
1,106
36,223
(6,608
DFW Cargo Center 2
27,916
28,116
(4,938
DFW Cargo Center East
20,063
(5,751
DFW Logistics Center 6
2,010
8,153
8,233
10,243
(157
Flower Mound Distribution Center
5,157
20,991
2,502
23,493
28,650
(7,223
Frankford Trade Center
27,530
34,412
(210
Freeport Corporate Center
15,965
63,935
7,948
15,872
71,976
87,848
(6,992
Freeport Distribution Center
1,393
5,549
6,065
1,440
11,567
13,007
(6,824
1996, 1997, 1998
Great Southwest Corporate Center
4,476
418
18,776
23,252
(875
Great Southwest Distribution Center
46,214
201,866
27,360
229,226
275,440
(67,049
1995, 1996, 1997, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2015
Greater Dallas Industrial Port
3,525
16,375
1,496
17,871
21,396
(3,289
Heritage Business Park
15,423
93,145
135
93,280
108,703
(1,911
Lonestar Portfolio
4,736
13,035
3,462
16,497
21,233
(3,345
( a,b )
( c )
Mesquite Distribution Center
34,609
1,123
35,732
44,087
(3,086
Northgate Distribution Center
62,062
7,498
13,488
69,073
82,561
(21,084
1999, 2005, 2008, 2012, 2014
Riverside Drive Distribution Center
5,107
14,919
14,921
20,028
(392
Royal Distribution Center
4,598
2,747
7,345
8,156
(3,118
2001
Stemmons Distribution Center
272
1,544
1,015
2,559
2,831
(1,780
Stemmons Industrial Center
1,653
10,526
6,548
17,074
(11,858
1994, 1995, 1996, 1999
Trinity Mills Distribution Center
735
3,774
1,076
4,850
5,585
(2,716
Valwood Business Center
4,679
19,195
1,352
20,547
25,226
(5,253
2001, 2006, 2014
Valwood Distribution Center
4,742
20,629
1,676
22,305
27,047
(4,084
Valwood Industrial
1,802
9,658
664
10,322
12,124
(2,114
Watersridge Distribution Center
1,939
11,365
11,376
13,315
(237
Dallas/Fort Worth Texas
171,886
818,278
113,413
172,523
931,054
(199,428
Denver Business Center
3,142
13,396
828
14,224
17,366
(1,906
Havana Distribution Center
1,421
5,657
5,832
7,253
(371
Pagosa Distribution Center
2,322
4,254
4,652
(3,038
1993
Peoria Distribution Center
4,129
16,593
16,752
20,881
Stapleton Bus Center North
8,930
33,424
7,963
34,391
42,354
(581
Stapleton Business Center
34,634
139,257
10,237
34,635
149,493
184,128
(52,901
Upland Distribution Center
4,064
19,035
5,508
4,077
24,530
28,607
(6,316
1994, 1995, 2014
Upland Distribution Center II
5,349
2,183
1,409
7,519
(3,110
1993, 2014
58,114
201,609
54,446
57,174
256,995
(68,978
Houston, Texas
Avondale Distribution Center
2,231
5,044
7,420
(103
Blalock Distribution Center
5,032
21,983
3,273
5,031
25,257
30,288
(5,647
2002, 2012
Cole Creek Distribution Center
3,865
22,534
150
22,684
26,549
(421
IAH Cargo Center 1
13,267
492
13,759
(1,349
Jersey Village Corporate Center
17,971
73,062
553
17,830
73,756
91,586
(7,233
Kempwood Business Center
9,894
3,626
13,520
15,266
(7,333
15,015
37,139
35,246
72,385
87,400
(7,548
2006, 2008, 2012, 2013, 2014
Perimeter Distribution Center
676
4,604
1,132
5,667
6,412
(3,166
Pine Forest Business Center
6,042
27,639
9,156
36,795
42,837
(16,967
1993, 1995, 2014
Pine North Distribution Center
847
4,800
1,297
6,097
6,944
(3,598
Pinemont Distribution Center
642
1,073
4,709
5,351
(2,789
Post Oak Business Center
2,334
11,655
9,950
21,605
23,939
(15,310
1993, 1994, 1996
Post Oak Distribution Center
8,758
6,256
15,014
16,536
(11,318
1993, 1994
Satsuma Station Distribution Center
3,088
22,389
22,422
25,510
(389
South Loop Distribution Center
1,943
4,619
(2,902
Sugarland Corporate Center
3,506
14,067
107
17,680
(637
West by Northwest Industrial Center
11,316
46,372
3,944
11,456
50,176
61,632
(7,242
1993, 1994, 2012, 2014
White Street Distribution Center
469
2,656
2,504
5,160
5,629
(3,550
Wingfoot Distribution Center
1,976
8,606
12,068
14,044
(1,726
2012, 2013
World Houston Distribution Center
1,529
6,326
6,376
7,905
(718
80,225
346,374
84,707
80,292
431,014
(99,946
Indianapolis, Indiana
Airport Bus Center
1,667
6,445
6,573
8,240
(306
Airtech Park
7,305
29,001
29,055
36,360
(1,345
Ameriplex Industrial Center
3,080
31,115
31,159
34,239
(467
Eastside Distribution Center
228
1,187
2,224
3,340
3,639
(1,985
North by Northeast Corporate Center
1,058
9,121
1,059
9,120
10,179
(5,312
North Plainfield Park Distribution Center
8,562
34,778
34,796
43,358
(1,597
Park 100 Industrial Center
10,410
43,048
22,526
65,574
75,984
(25,010
1995, 2012
Park 267
3,705
15,695
399
16,094
19,799
(703
Shadeland Industrial Center
428
2,431
3,480
429
5,910
6,339
(4,007
36,443
163,700
37,994
36,516
201,621
(40,732
Jacksonville, Florida
JAX Cargo Center
2,892
177
3,069
(1,160
Perimeter West Distribution Center
5,239
5,282
6,409
8,131
8,351
9,478
(1,286
Kansas City, Kansas
MCI Cargo Center 1
2,781
2,849
(1,661
MCI Cargo Center 2
11,630
(3,270
14,411
14,479
(4,931
Las Vegas, Nevada
Arrowhead Commerce Center
30,075
82,214
869
83,083
113,158
(1,709
Black Mountain Distribution Center
8,038
1,206
7,940
9,146
(4,218
87
Cameron Business Center
3,597
12,881
2,298
15,179
(5,862
Las Vegas Corporate Center
23,118
51,157
13,653
61,902
75,555
(1,763
Montessouri Distribution Center
1,039
2,967
4,006
Pama Distribution Center
2,223
5,695
5,721
7,944
(111
Sunrise Industrial Park
21,369
92,503
3,909
96,412
117,781
(8,941
2011, 2013, 2014
Valley View Distribution Center
2,420
258
2,678
(74
Warm Springs Distribution Center
8,897
39,055
39,151
48,048
(802
West One Business Center
2,468
13,985
5,529
19,514
21,982
(12,450
96,314
300,715
22,045
86,947
332,127
(36,001
Louisville, Kentucky
Cedar Grove Distribution Center
20,697
105,257
3,744
20,696
109,002
129,698
(13,455
2005, 2008, 2012, 2015
Commerce Crossings Distribution Center
1,912
266
7,915
9,827
(2,736
I-65 Meyer Distribution Center
9,557
32,334
25,091
9,864
57,118
66,982
(9,527
2006, 2012, 2015
New Cut Road Distribution Center
2,711
11,694
628
12,322
15,033
(1,903
River Ridge Distribution Center
8,102
69,329
69,348
77,450
(1,168
Riverport Distribution Center
1,515
8,585
1,817
13,465
15,282
44,494
234,848
34,930
45,102
269,170
(34,506
Memphis, Tennessee
Delp Distribution Center
1,068
10,546
894
12,508
(7,828
DeSoto Distribution Center
7,225
4,136
35,506
6,778
40,089
46,867
(7,396
Memphis Industrial Park
3,252
14,448
1,546
15,994
(2,310
Olive Branch Distribution Center
6,719
31,134
31,534
38,253
(5,230
Willow Lake Distribution Center
3,474
93
3,567
4,180
(2,186
18,877
63,738
38,439
18,430
102,624
(24,950
Nashville, Tennessee
CentrePointe Distribution Center
3,760
15,042
712
15,754
(1,041
Elam Farms Park
8,386
1,918
10,304
(1,145
I-40 Industrial Center
3,075
15,333
4,517
19,850
22,925
(8,123
1995, 1996, 1999, 2012
Interchange City Distribution Center
11,460
49,472
4,398
53,870
65,330
(4,537
1999, 2012, 2014
Nashville North Distribution Center
6,194
44,587
44,716
50,910
(1,015
Southpark Distribution Center
11,834
47,336
1,168
48,504
60,338
(3,300
38,420
180,156
12,842
192,998
231,418
(19,161
New Jersey/New York
Brunswick Distribution Center
870
4,928
2,955
7,883
8,753
(5,353
Carteret Distribution Center
39,148
109,078
109,153
148,301
(2,353
CenterPoint Distribution Center
2,839
12,490
1,753
14,243
17,082
(2,498
Chester Distribution Center
548
5,319
345
6,212
(4,364
Clifton Distribution Center
8,064
12,096
13,429
21,493
(2,565
Cranbury Business Park
43,056
91,129
2,598
93,727
136,783
(9,158
Dellamor
6,710
35,478
2,593
38,071
44,781
(7,734
Docks Corner SG (Phase II)
16,232
19,264
5,728
24,992
41,224
(7,747
Exit 10 Distribution Center
66,230
207,555
12,347
219,902
286,132
(49,910
2005, 2010, 2015
Exit 7 Distribution Center
35,728
117,157
117,169
152,897
(1,980
Exit 8A Distribution Center
21,164
85,257
3,804
89,061
110,225
(17,184
2005, 2014
Franklin Commercial Center
9,304
23,768
23,849
33,153
(3,384
Gourmet Lane Distribution Center
13,099
25,814
38,913
(153
Highway 17 55 Madis
2,937
13,477
1,115
14,592
17,529
(2,857
Interstate Distribution Center
30,188
76,705
77,004
107,192
(1,407
JFK Cargo Center 75_77
35,916
3,773
39,689
(17,488
Kilmer Distribution Center
14,313
18,552
21,078
(12,166
Liberty Log Center
24,029
245
24,274
27,547
(3,114
Linden Industrial
18,652
35,297
579
35,876
54,528
(1,581
Lister Distribution Center
16,855
26,004
158
26,162
43,017
Mahwah Corporate Center
12,695
27,342
938
28,280
40,975
(4,934
Maspeth Distribution Center
23,784
8,516
32,300
(49
Meadow Lane
1,036
6,388
6,389
7,425
(1,250
Meadowland Distribution Center
26,379
83,224
5,352
88,576
114,955
(22,259
Meadowland Industrial Center
4,190
13,469
20,399
33,868
38,058
(20,951
1996, 1998
Meadowlands ALFII
3,972
18,895
3,303
22,198
26,170
(3,778
Meadowlands Park
6,898
41,471
1,749
43,220
50,118
(8,474
Mooncreek Distribution Center
3,319
13,422
13,437
16,756
(2,849
Murray Hill Parkway
12,040
12,320
15,227
(2,168
National Distribution Center
3,918
168
4,086
6,503
(281
Newark Airport I and II
19,379
16,940
649
17,589
36,968
(1,536
Orchard Hill
678
3,756
3,777
4,455
(791
Pennsauken Distribution Center
192
557
203
1,505
1,708
(889
Perth Amboy Corporate Park
54,701
86,705
201
86,906
141,607
(712
Port Reading Business Park
211,931
256,740
123,590
209,055
383,206
592,261
(16,514
2005, 2014, 2015
Ports Jersey City Distribution Center
34,133
60,963
34,401
60,695
95,096
(2,480
Portview Commerce Center
9,577
21,581
19,111
9,797
40,472
50,269
(4,199
2011, 2012
Secaucus Distribution Center
9,603
26,889
36,492
(2,258
Skyland Crossdock
9,831
11,123
(2,421
South Jersey Distribution Center
6,912
17,437
204
17,641
24,553
(1,619
Teterboro Meadowlands 15
18,169
34,604
34,650
52,819
(4,308
Two South Middlesex
4,389
8,410
460
8,870
13,259
(1,966
117
794,684
1,660,722
310,220
792,307
1,973,319
(259,682
Norfolk, Virginia
Chesapeake Distribution Center
2,335
9,665
9,690
12,025
(416
Orlando, Florida
Beltway Commerce Center
25,526
7,111
32,637
49,719
(5,621
Chancellor Distribution Center
380
2,157
2,596
4,753
5,133
(3,160
Chancellor Square
2,087
9,708
2,835
12,543
14,630
(2,248
Consulate Distribution Center
6,105
31,550
2,580
34,130
40,235
(14,919
Crowne Pointe Park
7,497
11,428
(165
Davenport Distribution Center
102
4,093
5,027
(602
Lake Mary Logistics Center
1,374
5,101
5,141
6,515
(104
Orlando Central Park
1,398
5,977
6,380
7,778
(1,072
Orlando Corporate Center
8,061
33,030
1,410
34,440
42,501
(1,613
Presidents Drive
6,845
31,180
4,138
35,318
42,163
(7,072
Sand Lake Service Center
3,704
19,546
3,603
23,149
26,853
(4,599
51,858
175,263
24,861
200,124
(41,175
Phoenix, Arizona
24th Street Industrial Center
503
2,852
561
4,785
5,346
(3,622
Alameda Distribution Center
3,872
14,358
3,033
17,391
21,263
(6,229
Brookridge Distribution Center
3,897
15,153
241
15,394
19,291
(733
Hohokam 10 Business Center
1,317
7,468
1,376
8,843
10,161
(4,971
Kyrene Commons Distribution Center
1,093
5,475
2,786
8,261
9,354
(5,209
1992, 1998, 1999
Papago Distribution Center
4,828
20,017
5,007
4,829
25,023
29,852
(10,709
1994, 2005
Phoenix Distribution Center
4,837
17,257
1,009
18,266
23,103
(1,005
University Dr Distribution Center
683
2,735
820
3,555
4,238
(1,156
Watkins Street Distribution Center
242
1,375
792
243
2,166
(1,410
Wilson Drive Distribution Center
6,028
7,301
(2,227
22,545
91,783
17,990
22,606
109,712
132,318
(37,271
Portland, Oregon
Clackamas Distribution Center
8,828
28,192
28,491
37,319
(1,858
PDX Cargo Center Airtrans
247
13,944
(3,506
PDX Corporate Center East
(d)(e)
21,303
21,433
28,559
(947
PDX Corporate Center North Phase II
10,293
25,461
2,102
27,563
37,856
(3,271
2008, 2014
Portland Northwest Corporate Park
13,666
40,999
41,025
54,691
(489
Southshore Corporate Center
24,173
10,261
8,143
35,771
43,914
(4,864
2006, 2014, 2015
49,393
153,825
13,065
48,056
168,227
(14,935
Reno, Nevada
Damonte Ranch Distribution Center
8,764
36,766
956
37,722
46,486
(4,746
Golden Valley Distribution Center
13,686
3,254
2,415
15,465
17,880
(5,090
Meredith Kleppe Business Center
2,988
10,933
4,755
15,688
18,676
(4,008
Packer Way Distribution Center
506
2,879
2,011
4,890
5,396
(3,658
Reno Aircenter
12,292
13,937
14,481
(218
RNO Cargo Center 10_11
4,265
4,670
(1,338
Sage Point Business Park
1,705
6,821
95
6,916
(125
Stead Distribution Center
1,046
19,330
19,610
20,656
(357
Tahoe-Reno Industrial Center
4,964
30,381
23,957
54,338
59,302
(6,337
Vista Industrial Park
5,923
26,807
10,458
37,265
43,188
(19,189
1994, 2001
27,380
164,160
47,816
28,855
210,501
239,356
(45,066
Salt Lake City, Utah
Clearfield Industrial Center
3,485
14,759
18,244
(991
San Antonio, Texas
Coliseum Distribution Center
8,155
(307
Director Drive Distribution Center
1,271
5,455
5,732
7,003
Downtown Distribution Center
2,347
2,926
Eisenhauer Distribution Center
5,042
21,383
941
22,324
27,366
(2,701
Interchange East Distribution Center
6,535
6,769
8,265
(1,485
Landmark One Distribution Center
857
3,439
3,552
4,409
(160
Macro Distribution Center
2,535
12,395
4,498
16,893
19,428
(5,611
2002, 2014
Perrin Creek Corporate Center
9,770
40,193
40,720
50,490
(4,004
Rittiman East Industrial Park
4,848
19,223
3,251
22,474
27,322
(7,177
Rittiman West Industrial Park
1,230
6,134
(2,260
San Antonio Distribution Center I
1,203
4,648
12,139
13,342
(9,472
San Antonio Distribution Center II
7,638
8,523
(4,564
San Antonio Distribution Center III
5,079
22,364
5,083
23,435
28,518
(4,021
Tri-County Distribution Center
6,888
27,718
2,838
6,889
30,555
37,444
(5,378
43,290
177,198
30,067
43,295
207,260
(48,246
San Francisco Bay Area, California
Acer Distribution Center
3,368
15,139
253
15,392
18,760
(3,113
Alvarado Business Center
20,739
62,595
7,311
69,906
90,645
(24,865
Bayshore Distribution Center
6,450
15,049
17,746
24,196
(3,747
Bayside Corporate Center
4,365
21,297
25,662
(13,800
1995, 1996
Bayside Plaza I
5,212
18,008
8,936
5,216
26,940
32,156
(18,917
Bayside Plaza II
634
3,838
4,472
(2,530
Brennan Distribution
7,553
7,619
9,531
(1,516
Component Drive Industrial Port
2,829
14,277
17,106
(2,841
Cypress
1,065
5,103
5,355
6,420
(1,039
Dado Distribution
2,194
11,079
276
11,355
13,549
(2,397
Doolittle Distribution Center
2,843
18,849
1,138
19,987
22,830
(3,447
Dowe Industrial Center
5,884
20,400
879
21,279
27,163
(4,356
Dublin Industrial Portfolio
3,241
15,951
1,071
17,022
20,263
(2,788
East Bay Doolittle
4,015
15,988
1,718
17,706
21,721
(3,832
East Grand Airfreight
13,858
31,627
1,008
32,635
46,493
(2,777
Edgewater Industrial Center
6,630
31,153
3,321
34,474
41,104
(6,864
Eigenbrodt Way Distribution Center
393
2,228
694
2,922
3,315
(2,153
Gateway Corporate Center
6,736
24,747
11,274
6,744
36,013
42,757
(25,190
Hayward Commerce Center
1,933
10,955
3,783
14,738
16,671
(10,791
Hayward Commerce Park
10,519
687
18,337
(682
Hayward Distribution Center
831
5,510
3,442
1,038
8,745
9,783
(6,727
Hayward Industrial Center
13,535
48,573
11,915
60,488
74,023
(26,067
1993, 2015
Junction Industrial Park
7,658
39,106
1,975
41,081
48,739
Lakeside BC
3,969
11,181
2,479
13,660
17,629
(1,682
Laurelwood Drive
18,709
34,925
514
35,439
54,148
(2,770
Lawrence SSF
2,189
7,796
9,985
(1,471
Livermore Distribution Center
8,992
26,976
29,456
38,448
(10,844
Martin-Scott Industrial Port
3,546
9,717
10,177
13,723
(2,018
Oakland Industrial Center
8,234
24,704
2,569
8,235
27,272
35,507
(9,553
Overlook Distribution Center
1,573
8,915
11,491
13,064
(5,404
Pacific Business Center
6,075
26,260
3,934
30,194
36,269
(5,599
Pacific Commons Industrial Center
25,784
77,594
25,805
79,764
105,569
(28,056
Pacific Industrial Center
21,675
65,083
4,977
70,060
91,735
(24,542
San Francisco Industrial Park
17,508
32,516
32,541
50,049
(1
San Leandro Distribution Center
28,264
44,507
3,822
28,265
48,328
76,593
(9,169
Shoreline Business Center
16,101
6,641
22,742
27,070
(15,430
Silicon Valley R and D
5,259
587
5,846
7,108
(933
South Bay Brokaw
23,296
1,754
29,064
(4,106
South Bay Junction
3,662
21,120
1,866
22,986
26,648
(3,742
South Bay Lundy
6,500
33,642
2,577
36,219
42,719
(6,328
Spinnaker Business Center
7,043
25,220
12,206
37,426
44,469
(25,616
Thornton Business Center
8,802
27,614
4,704
8,821
32,299
41,120
(11,524
TriPoint Bus Park
9,057
23,727
28,463
37,520
(4,334
Utah Airfreight
10,657
42,842
2,133
44,975
55,632
(7,443
Wiegman Road
6,658
21,558
436
21,994
28,652
(2,082
Yosemite Drive
31,304
65,674
65,963
97,267
(2,218
Zanker-Charcot Industrial
4,867
28,750
1,474
30,224
35,091
(5,014
San Francisco Bay Area California
368,128
1,128,343
154,304
368,389
1,282,386
1,650,775
(367,045
Savannah, Georgia
Morgan Business Center
2,161
14,680
1,235
15,915
Seattle, Washington
Auburn Distribution Center
2,608
5,742
8,350
(40
East Valley Warehouse
10,472
57,825
1,024
58,849
69,321
(8,684
Fife Distribution Center
3,245
13,734
3,588
13,391
16,979
(760
Harvest Business Park
3,541
18,827
19,783
23,324
(3,243
Interurban Distribution Center
7,233
13,958
13,960
21,193
(588
Kent Centre Corporate Park
5,397
21,599
1,122
22,721
28,118
(3,689
Kent Corporate Center
12,616
8,368
140
8,508
21,124
(205
Kent-Northwest Corporate Park
71,768
139,886
968
140,854
212,622
(3,650
Kingsport Industrial Park
16,605
48,942
16,800
51,312
68,112
(11,160
Northwest Distribution Center
24,090
1,748
25,838
30,952
(4,346
Occidental Distribution Center
1,770
1,960
3,730
Portside Distribution Cent
19,114
44,598
1,622
20,514
44,820
65,334
(1,147
ProLogis Park SeaTac
12,230
14,170
3,460
12,457
17,403
29,860
(3,770
Puget Sound Airfreight
1,408
371
4,572
5,980
(745
Renton Northwest Corp. Park
5,102
17,946
919
18,865
23,967
(3,619
SEA Cargo Center North
10,279
10,342
(7,262
Sumner Landing
(e)
10,332
32,545
767
33,312
43,644
(4,390
Van Doren's Distribution Center
3,166
7,339
7,346
10,512
(322
191,721
472,275
29,468
193,886
499,578
693,464
(57,624
Airport West Distribution Center
1,253
3,825
4,109
1,974
7,213
(3,980
1995, 1998
Arvida Park of Commerce
9,527
11,743
11,777
21,304
(356
Beacon Centre
37,998
196,004
12,768
208,772
246,770
(32,300
Beacon Industrial Park
75,424
3,742
79,166
102,677
(11,547
Beacon Lakes
32,658
24,691
37,778
62,469
95,127
(1,675
Blue Lagoon Business Park
9,189
29,451
1,636
31,087
40,276
(5,205
CenterPort Distribution Center
22,504
3,445
8,922
25,829
34,751
(9,564
1999, 2012
Commercial Logistics Center
7,938
11,083
11,303
19,241
(352
Congress Distribution Center
2,266
5,639
5,649
(150
Copans Distribution Center
2,857
1,483
4,340
4,844
(2,321
1997, 1998
Delray Beach Commerce Center
1,765
1,311
3,076
(64
Dolphin Distribution Center
2,716
851
8,215
10,931
(1,793
Gateway Center
1,284
1,290
2,305
(35
Hollywood Park Distribution Center
16,848
36,191
673
36,864
53,712
(1,046
International Corp Park
26,915
54,436
57,150
84,065
(4,252
2010, 2015
Lyons Technology Park
1,988
3,651
3,658
5,646
Magnolia Park Distribution Center
1,613
1,643
3,041
(44
Marlin Distribution Center
1,844
6,603
448
7,051
8,895
(1,344
Miami Airport Business Center
11,173
45,921
2,180
48,101
59,274
(8,522
North Andrews Distribution Center
11,327
22,330
416
22,746
34,073
(3,288
Pompano Beach Distribution Center
11,035
15,136
3,849
18,985
30,020
(3,432
Pompano Center of Commerce
5,171
13,930
426
14,356
19,527
(2,194
Port Lauderdale Distribution Center
40,927
73,128
9,449
42,235
81,269
123,504
(8,271
1997, 2012, 2014, 2015
Port Lucie West Distribution Center
1,131
1,412
1,453
2,584
ProLogis Park I-595
1,998
11,326
1,027
1,999
12,352
14,351
(5,410
2003
Prospect Park Distribution Center
9,896
16,144
244
16,388
26,284
(535
Sawgrass International Park
5,163
16,654
(216
Seneca Distribution Center
16,357
46,738
46,799
63,156
(857
South Dade Commerce Center
1,791
147
(14
Sunshine Park Distribution Center
2,822
4,857
4,859
7,681
(140
Tarpon Distribution Center
1,847
6,451
249
6,700
8,547
(1,484
308,773
764,595
87,989
310,923
850,434
(110,544
Activity Distribution Center
10,820
27,410
27,448
38,268
(582
Anaheim Industrial Center
31,086
57,836
61,194
92,280
(21,264
Anaheim Industrial Property
5,096
10,816
10,886
15,982
(1,765
Arrow Industrial Park
8,120
986
9,106
13,946
(1,565
Artesia Industrial
163,764
217,400
223,523
387,287
(29,381
Bell Ranch Distribution
5,539
23,092
1,657
24,749
Brea Industrial Center
2,488
4,062
395
4,457
6,945
(672
California Commerce Center
30,127
52,094
56,551
86,678
(5,471
Carson Distribution Center
29,974
22,483
17,035
29,975
39,517
69,492
(2,328
Carson Industrial
844
2,081
796
3,721
(541
Carson Town Center
11,781
31,572
32,643
44,424
(4,824
CAT - Kaiser Commercial Center
4,971
8,816
4,972
8,815
13,787
Cedarpointe Industrial Park
56,349
105,792
106,507
162,856
(3,970
Chartwell Distribution Center
55,803
77,135
79,359
135,162
(4,221
Chatsworth Distribution Center
11,713
17,569
17,647
29,360
(442
Chino Industrial Center
1,274
2,134
(905
Commerce Industrial Center
11,345
17,653
19,775
31,120
(2,493
Crossroads Business Park
36,131
98,030
135,003
89,668
179,496
269,164
(39,322
2005, 2010, 2014
Del Amo Industrial Center
7,471
17,889
387
18,276
25,747
(3,511
Dominguez North Industrial Center
20,662
34,382
4,240
20,688
38,596
59,284
(7,860
2007, 2012
Eaves Distribution Center
13,914
31,041
2,282
33,323
47,237
(6,746
Foothill Business Center
5,254
8,096
8,259
13,513
(1,134
Ford Distribution Center
44,128
108,125
3,239
111,364
155,492
(17,819
Fordyce Distribution Center
6,110
19,485
906
20,391
26,501
(4,348
Harris Business Center Alliance II
13,134
66,195
2,392
68,587
81,721
(11,601
Haven Distribution Center
96,975
73,903
7,704
81,607
178,582
(15,877
Huntington Beach Distribution Center
14,679
22,019
36,698
(183
Industry Distribution Center
54,170
99,434
6,987
106,421
160,591
(35,819
2005, 2012
Inland Empire Distribution Center
43,320
84,006
8,212
44,100
91,438
135,538
(23,714
2005, 2012, 2015
International Multifoods
10,843
15,543
(1,577
Jack Northrup Distribution Center
4,280
9,820
14,100
(189
Kaiser Distribution Center
131,819
242,618
20,236
136,030
258,643
394,673
(84,323
2005, 2008
LAX Cargo Center
19,217
366
19,583
(6,149
Los Angeles Industrial Center
7,015
378
7,393
11,170
Main St Distribution Center
13,058
20,370
751
21,121
34,179
Meridian Park
38,270
70,022
149
70,171
108,441
(7,264
2008, 2015
Mid Counties Industrial Center
62,329
101,667
15,800
117,467
179,796
(39,490
2005, 2006, 2010, 2012, 2015
Mill Street Distribution Center
1,825
4,306
6,131
(199
Mill Street Spec Distribution Center
15,691
36,550
36,688
52,379
(1,638
Milliken Distribution Center
18,831
30,811
233
31,044
49,875
(4,672
NDP - Los Angeles
14,855
41,115
2,642
43,757
58,612
(8,685
Normandie Industrial
12,297
14,957
1,686
16,643
28,940
(3,522
North County Distribution Center
75,581
101,342
5,986
107,328
182,909
(12,937
2011, 2012, 2015
Ontario Distribution Center
18,823
29,524
482
30,006
48,829
(4,220
Orange Industrial Center
4,156
7,836
349
4,157
8,184
12,341
(2,866
20,810
32,169
2,356
34,525
55,335
(4,788
Pomona Distribution Center
22,361
27,898
27,912
50,273
(966
ProLogis Park Ontario
25,499
47,366
876
48,242
73,741
(14,170
Rancho Cucamonga Distribution Center
58,710
113,273
3,638
58,711
116,910
175,621
(30,925
Redlands Commercial Center
20,583
30,881
30,894
51,477
(1,396
Redlands Distribution Center
98,682
120,920
104,484
102,416
221,670
324,086
(24,816
2006, 2007, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
Redondo Beach Distribution Center
7,455
11,223
18,678
(358
Rialto Distribution Center
86,270
200,602
33,375
88,505
231,742
320,247
(22,690
Riverbluff Distribution Center
42,964
33,014
75,978
2009
Santa Ana Distribution Center
32,168
989
33,157
60,227
(3,599
Santa Fe Distribution Center
9,927
22,090
(254
Slover Distribution Center
40,335
45,492
45,517
85,852
South Bay Distribution Center
14,478
27,511
6,757
15,280
33,466
48,746
(11,278
2005, 2007
South Bay Transport
15,928
23,891
39,819
(25
Starboard Distribution Center
18,763
53,824
332
54,156
72,919
(8,816
Terra Francesco
11,196
15,591
(343
Torrance Distribution Center
25,730
40,414
40,763
66,493
(5,719
Transpark Inland Empire Distribution Center
28,936
42,167
42,429
71,365
(1,805
Van Nuys Airport Industrial
23,455
39,916
42,558
66,013
(6,626
Vernon Distribution Center
25,439
47,250
4,092
25,441
51,340
76,781
(18,696
Vernon Industrial
692
4,121
3,516
7,637
(2,672
Vista Distribution Center
4,150
6,225
3,514
9,739
13,889
(2,406
Walnut Drive
7,397
217
7,614
(1,256
Watson Industrial Center AFdII
11,193
11,564
18,508
(1,900
Wilmington Avenue Warehouse
11,172
34,723
2,423
37,146
48,318
(6,101
Workman Mill Distribution Center
32,467
56,672
89,139
(952
270
1,901,481
3,142,585
497,531
1,967,307
3,574,290
5,541,597
(614,551
Tampa, Florida
Corporate Center Tampa
4,458
19,166
322
19,488
23,946
(502
Tampa West Distribution Center
432
2,582
(100
21,748
22,070
26,960
Subtotal United States:
1,799
5,461,589
14,367,377
2,519,859
5,547,099
16,801,726
22,348,825
(3,054,600
Canada:
Toronto
Airport Rd. Distribution Center
21,761
61,219
2,048
22,743
62,285
85,028
(8,397
Annagem Distribution Center
2,935
10,040
731
3,068
10,638
13,706
(1,498
Annagem Distribution Center II
4,235
728
4,888
6,615
(757
Bolton Distribution Center
20,753
6,952
20,452
27,404
(3,159
Keele Distribution Center
1,034
4,148
1,081
4,591
5,672
(928
Meadowvale Distribution Center
30,184
45,247
30,748
44,683
75,431
(752
Millcreek Distribution Center
7,200
27,387
578
7,525
35,165
(3,899
Milton 401 Business Park
18,401
2,954
5,870
21,102
26,972
(3,478
Milton 402 Business Park
9,213
31,586
1,838
9,524
33,113
42,637
(3,033
2011, 2014
Milton Crossings Business Park
16,405
39,931
4,202
17,145
43,393
60,538
(5,867
Mississauga Gateway Center
45,243
104,681
45,474
104,481
149,955
(5,669
Pearson Logistic Center
10,466
37,515
1,377
10,938
49,358
(5,180
Tapscott Dist Ctr
4,431
6,582
2,948
8,065
11,013
162,792
339,143
87,559
165,743
423,751
(42,617
Subtotal Canada:
Parque Opcion
730
2,287
2,132
4,419
5,149
(656
Subtotal Mexico:
Subtotal North American Markets:
1823
5,625,111
14,708,807
2,609,550
5,713,572
17,229,896
22,943,468
(3,097,873
92
European Markets
Austria
Himberg DC
3,331
5,616
3,667
5,280
Boom Distribution Center
12,260
16,570
Prague Rudna Distribution Center
2,333
12,156
2,868
15,024
17,357
(225
Uzice Distribution Center
2,422
15,811
18,233
(3,698
18,679
30,835
35,590
(3,923
Bonneuil Distribution Center
14,501
(1,102
LGR Genevill. 1 SAS
2,006
2,176
733
2,909
(377
LGR Genevill. 2 SAS
1,542
3,196
3,233
4,775
(405
Moissy II Distribution Center
4,978
4,004
4,932
4,050
8,982
(1,469
Port of Rouen
13,881
14,046
(2,376
8,526
19,253
19,440
8,480
38,739
47,219
(5,729
Hausbruch Industrial Center 4-B
7,438
5,056
12,494
(1,800
Hausbruch Industrial Center 5-650
2,677
413
713
3,390
(158
Kolleda Distribution Center
3,564
3,279
3,510
(543
Lauenau Distribution Center
2,496
5,557
5,855
(943
Meerane Distribution Center
615
4,729
4,513
5,128
(716
13,457
19,100
316
19,416
(4,160
Arena Po Distribution Center
20,085
467
20,552
27,972
(4,519
Castel San Giovanni Distribution Center
3,084
9,416
9,644
12,728
(1,622
Siziano Logistic Park
9,851
17,858
821
28,530
(2,779
20,355
47,359
48,875
Nadarzyn Distribution Center
2,252
7,081
2,249
7,084
9,333
(1,265
Piotrkow II Distribution Center
5,008
1,441
6,472
(1,028
Sochaczew Distribution Center
10,578
772
11,752
12,524
(2,558
Szczecin Distribution Center
278
4,032
281
4,029
4,310
Teresin Distribution Center
3,044
15,907
3,608
16,311
19,919
(2,782
7,157
26,485
18,916
44,207
52,558
(7,759
Sered Distribution Center
2,174
11,869
(1,948
Barajas MAD Logistics
35,219
901
(6,699
Orebro Distribution Center
9,025
19,731
2,195
21,926
30,951
(5,248
Midpoint Park
15,972
11,478
23,698
22,163
28,985
51,148
(1,758
Subtotal European Markets:
97,012
207,351
103,230
104,687
302,906
407,593
(49,213
Asian Markets
Dalian Industrial Park DC
13,704
2,247
13,935
16,182
Fengxian Logistics Center
910
13,888
(4,368
Jiaxing Distribution Center
10,793
10,464
12,437
9,358
24,336
33,694
(2,215
2011, 2013
Tianjin Bonded LP
8,938
1,379
9,067
10,446
(1,321
14,659
46,084
13,467
12,984
61,226
(9,684
ProLogis Park Aichi Distribution Center
18,310
73,995
24,533
67,772
92,305
(12,235
ProLogis Park Narita III
60,396
9,604
68,759
87,035
(11,392
35,345
83,599
42,809
136,531
179,340
(23,627
Airport Logistics Center 3
24,038
24,206
(4,946
Changi South Distribution Center 1
39,173
39,280
(7,366
Changi-North DC1
12,961
14,709
(2,596
Singapore Airport Logistic Center 2
34,807
198
35,005
(7,180
Tuas Distribution Center
(5,370
128,659
2,475
(27,458
Subtotal Asian Markets:
50,004
235,139
99,541
55,793
328,891
384,684
(60,769
Total Industrial Operating Properties:
1872
5,772,127
15,151,297
2,812,321
(3,207,855
Development Portfolio
14,030
36,256
50,286
5,725
21,683
27,408
19,755
57,939
77,694
6,577
45,756
52,333
9,462
10,156
4,552
4,897
1,381
3,511
4,892
1,726
8,063
9,789
Gateway International Distribution Center
2,676
16,531
19,207
3,642
17,432
21,074
Dallas Corporate Center North Distribution Center
6,014
18,298
24,312
Gold Spike Distribution Center
3,629
17,696
21,325
4,731
25,563
30,294
Mountain Creek
13,181
33,805
46,986
Park 121 Distribution Center
18,840
ST Micro Distribution Center
2,429
273
2,702
36,872
107,587
144,459
Stapleton Business Center North
2,493
10,599
13,092
Greens Parkway Distribution Center
1,246
9,723
10,969
3,686
5,951
9,637
Las Vegas Beltway Distribution Center
6,341
452
297
10,157
16,857
Center Pointe Distribution Center
3,746
8,900
12,646
New Jersey
Edison Distribution Center
43,595
74,205
Elizabeth Seaport II
37,325
37,406
67,935
43,676
111,611
6,447
8,200
Orlando Airport Park
1,102
6,361
7,012
7,549
14,561
1,740
31,067
32,807
Cornerstone Distribution Center
Boyce Distribution Center
21,719
24,450
46,169
11,031
11,072
Pinole Point
7,700
19,515
27,215
40,450
44,006
84,456
57,795
117,174
174,969
266,689
548,900
815,589
Milton 402 Bus Park
9,675
13,943
23,618
Centro Industrial Center
2,828
8,779
11,607
El Puente Industrial Center
778
4,194
PDX Corporate Center North/South
14,602
13,701
28,303
San Jose Distribution Center
12,699
392
13,091
Toluca Distribution Center
3,060
3,124
6,184
33,967
30,190
64,157
310,331
593,033
903,364
Prague Airport Distribution Center
4,523
14,231
Prague-Jirny Distribution Center
5,137
8,376
9,660
18,084
27,744
Isle d'Abeau Distribution Center
3,853
Le Havre Distribution Center
1,836
17,385
19,221
14,801
19,751
Presles Distribution Center
10,639
32,186
42,825
Bergheim Distribution Center
6,956
12,057
Munich East Distribution Center
26,764
60,627
87,391
31,865
67,583
99,448
Hegyeshalom Distribution Center
Eindhoven Distribution Center
9,346
Fokker Logistics Center
15,512
15,567
Venlo Distribution Center
6,239
14,774
21,013
21,751
24,175
45,926
Chorzow Distribution Center
3,758
677
8,787
9,464
Wroclaw V Distribution Center
1,846
7,091
6,281
14,032
20,313
Bratislava Distribution Center
1,785
2,066
3,851
Birmingham International Gateway Distribution Center
18,971
3,690
22,661
Boscombe Road Distribution Center
17,929
9,930
27,859
Daventry Phase II Distribution Center
6,574
5,673
12,247
Park Ryton Distribution Center
14,389
8,088
Stockly Park Distribution Center
28,344
28,356
86,207
27,393
113,600
168,441
185,519
353,960
Chiba New Town Distribution Center
30,543
81,966
112,509
Hisayama Distribution Center
5,034
20,292
25,326
Ibaraki Distribution Center
41,824
61,737
103,561
Kobe Distribution Center
17,155
13,806
30,961
Koga Distribution Center
6,746
7,581
14,327
Narashino IV Distribution Center
19,050
50,988
70,038
Narita 1
9,208
22,645
31,853
Osaka 5
35,195
78,288
113,483
Yoshimi Distribution Center
20,891
92,630
113,521
185,646
429,933
615,579
Total Development Portfolio
664,418
1,208,485
GRAND TOTAL
1963
6,436,545
4,020,806
6,538,470
19,070,178
25,608,648
Schedule III – Footnotes
(a)
The following table reconciles real estate assets per Schedule III to the Consolidated Balance Sheet in Item 8 at December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
Total per Schedule III
Other real estate investments
Total per consolidated balance sheet
(f)
(b)
The aggregate cost for federal tax purposes at December 31, 2015, of our real estate assets was approximately $16.9 billion (unaudited).
Real estate assets (excluding land balances) are depreciated over their estimated useful lives. These useful lives are generally 5 to 7 years for capital improvements, 10 years for standard tenant improvements, 25 years for depreciable land improvements, 30 years for operating properties acquired and 40 years for operating properties we develop.
The following table reconciles accumulated depreciation per Schedule III to the Consolidated Balance Sheet in Item 8 at December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
Total accumulated depreciation per Schedule III
3,207,855
Accumulated depreciation on other real estate investments
66,429
Properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $5.8 billion secure $3.0 billion of mortgage notes. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for more information related to our secured mortgage debt.
Assessment bonds of $15.2 million are secured by assessments (similar to property taxes) on various underlying real estate properties with an aggregate undepreciated cost of $843.8 million. See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 for more information related to our assessment bonds.
The following table summarizes our real estate assets and accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
Real estate assets:
Balance at beginning of year
20,109,432
18,822,081
23,559,891
Acquisitions of operating properties, improvements to operating properties
development activity, transfers of land to CIP and net effect of changes in foreign
exchange rates and other
7,191,335
3,595,836
2,050,810
Basis of operating properties disposed of
(1,719,632
(2,713,300
(6,857,994
Change in the development portfolio balance, including the acquisition of properties
398,923
452,963
69,374
Assets transferred to held-for-sale
(371,410
(48,148
Balance at end year
Accumulated depreciation:
2,748,835
2,540,267
2,460,642
Depreciation expense
617,258
490,298
505,691
Balances retired upon disposition of operating properties and net effect of changes
in foreign exchange rates and other
(153,621
(277,516
(426,066
(4,617
(4,214
Balance at end of year
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
By:
/s/ HAMID R. MOGHADAM
Hamid R. Moghadam
Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 19, 2016
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned officers and directors of Prologis, Inc., hereby severally constitute Hamid R. Moghadam, Thomas S. Olinger and Edward S. Nekritz, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Form 10-K filed herewith and any and all amendments to said Form 10-K, and generally to do all such things in our names and in our capacities as officers and directors to enable Prologis, Inc. to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ THOMAS S. OLINGER
Chief Financial Officer
Thomas S. Olinger
/s/ LORI A. PALAZZOLO
Managing Director and Chief Accounting Officer
Lori A. Palazzolo
/s/ GEORGE L. FOTIADES
Director
George L. Fotiades
/s/ CHRISTINE N. GARVEY
Christine N. Garvey
/s/ LYDIA H. KENNARD
Lydia H. Kennard
/s/ J. MICHAEL LOSH
J. Michael Losh
/s/ IRVING F. LYONS III
Irving F. Lyons III
/s/ DAVID P. O’CONNOR
David P. O’Connor
/s/ JEFFREY L. SKELTON
Jeffrey L. Skelton
/s/ CARL B. WEBB
Carl B. Webb
/s/ WILLIAM D. ZOLLARS
William D. Zollars
98
Prologis, Inc., its general partner
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned officers and directors of Prologis, L.P., hereby severally constitute Hamid R. Moghadam, Thomas S. Olinger and Edward S. Nekritz, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Form 10-K filed herewith and any and all amendments to said Form 10-K, and generally to do all such things in our names and in our capacities as officers and directors to enable Prologis, L.P. to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto.
99
Certain of the following documents are filed herewith. Certain other of the following documents that have been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and, pursuant to Rule 12b-32, are incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Distribution Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2015, among Prologis, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 5, 2015).
3.1
Articles of Incorporation of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-35915) filed September 18, 1997).
Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the Series Q Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed June 2, 2011).
Articles of Merger of New Pumpkin Inc., a Maryland corporation, with and into Prologis, Inc., a Maryland corporation, changing the name of “AMB Property Corporation” to “Prologis, Inc.”, as filed with the Stated Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland on June 2, 2011, and effective June 3, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
Articles of Amendment (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2012).
Seventh Amended and Restated Bylaws of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
3.6
Thirteenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.7 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
3.8
First Amendment to Thirteenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Prologis, L.P., dated February 27, 2014, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 27, 2014).
Articles Supplementary dated April 3, 2014, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2014).
3.10
Second Amendment to the Thirteenth Amended and Restated Agreement of the Limited Partnership of Prologis, L.P., dated October 7, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 13, 2015).
Form of Certificate for Common Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (No. 333-172741) filed April 12, 2011).
Form of Certificate for the Series Q Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Prologis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (No. 333-172741) filed April 28, 2011).
Indenture, dated as of June 8, 2011, by and among the Operating Partnership, as issuer, Prologis, as guarantor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-177112) filed September 30, 2011).
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 15, 2013, among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P. and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
Form of Sixth Supplemental Indenture among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., Elavon Financial Services Limited, UK Branch, Elavon Financial Services Limited and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 2, 2013).
4.6
Form of Seventh Supplemental Indenture among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., Elavon Financial Services Limited, UK Branch, Elavon Financial Services Limited and U.S. Bank National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2014).
Indenture, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006).
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163) filed April 2, 1998).
4.9
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163) filed April 2, 1998).
4.10
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163) filed April 2, 1998).
4.11
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 10, 2006, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 10, 2006).
4.12
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2009, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 20, 2009).
4.13
Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2009, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 20, 2009).
4.14
Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2010, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 9, 2010).
4.15
Eleventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 12, 2010, by and among the Operating Partnership, Prologis and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor-in-interest to State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2010).
4.16
4.00% Notes due 2018 and Related Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2010).
4.17
Form of 2.750% Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.18
Form of 4.250% Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.19
3.350% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 1, 2013).
4.20
Form of 3.000% Notes due 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 2, 2013).
4.21
Form of 3.375% Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2014).
4.22
Form of 3.00% Notes due 2026 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2014).
4.23
Form of 1.375% Notes due 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 6, 2014).
4.24
Officers’ Certificate related to the 2.750% Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.25
Officers’ Certificate related to the 4.250% Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013).
4.26
Officers’ Certificate related to the 3.350% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 1, 2013).
Form of Officers’ Certificate related to the 3.375% Notes due 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 18, 2014).
4.28
Form of Officer’s Certificate related to the 3.00% Notes due 2026 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 28, 2014).
4.29
Form of Officer’s Certificate related to 1.375% Notes due 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-k filed on October 6, 2014).
4.30
Form of Officers’ Certificate related to the 1.375% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2015).
4.31
Form of 1.375% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 12, 2015).
4.32
Form of Officers’ Certificate related to the 3.750% Notes due 2025 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 30, 2015).
4.33
Form of 3.750% Notes due 2025 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 30, 2015).
Other debt instruments are omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Registration S-K. Copies of such instruments will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
10.1
Agreement of Limited Partnership of ProLogis Limited Partnership-I, dated as of December 22, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Trust’s Registration Statement (No. 33-73382)) .
10.2
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of ProLogis Fraser, L.P., dated as of August 4, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).
Fifteenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Prologis 2, L.P., (f/k/a AMB Property II, L.P.) dated February 19, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
10.4
Transfer and Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 22, 1993, by and among the Trust and the persons set forth therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Trust’s Registration Statement (No. 33-73382)).
Registration Rights Agreement dated February 9, 2007, between the Trust and each of the parties identified therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.10 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).
101
Form of Registration Rights Agreement, by and among Prologis and the persons named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-35915) filed September 18, 1997).
10.7
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009, by and between Prologis and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 10, 2009).
10.8
Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 26, 1997, by and among Prologis and the persons named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010).
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 8, 2005, by and between the Operating Partnership and Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 13, 2005).
10.10
Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 14, 2003, by and among Prologis 2, L.P.(formerly known as AMB Property II, L.P.) and the unitholders whose names are set forth on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 17, 2003).
10.11
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 5, 1999, by and among Prologis, Prologis 2, L.P. and the unitholders whose names are set forth on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.33 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).
10.12
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2006, by and among Prologis, Prologis 2, L.P., J.A. Green Development Corp. and JAGI, Inc (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.34 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006).
10.13
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2013, by and among Prologis, Inc., Prologis 2, L.P. and Bakar AMB Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013).
10.14†
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2015, by and among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P. and the parties listed on Exhibit A thereto.
10.15†
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 7, 2015, by and among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P. and the parties listed on Exhibit A thereto.
10.16†
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of October 9, 2015, by and among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P. and the parties listed on Exhibit A thereto.
10.17*
The Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).
10.18*
Amendment No. 1 to the Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Operating Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001).
10.19*
Amendment No. 2 to the Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Operating Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004).
10.20*
Amended and Restated 2002 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 4, 2006 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 4, 2006).
10.21*
The Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 15, 2007 and also incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Operating Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 15, 2007).
10.22*
Prologis Outperformance Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2011).
10.23*
Form of Participation Points and LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 27, 2014).
10.24*
Second Amended and Restated Prologis Promote Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1, 2014).
10.25*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Second Amended and Restated Prologis Promote Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2014).
10.26*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (General) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).
10.27†*
Form of Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (LTIP Unit election).
10.28*
Form of Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).
10.29*
Form of Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Bonus exchange) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).
10.30*
ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 2, 2006).
10.31*
First Amendment of the ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010).
10.32*
Second Amendment of the ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 19, 2010).
10.33*
Third Amendment of the ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010).
10.34*
Form of Non Qualified Share Option Award Terms; The Trust 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
10.35*
Form of Restricted Share Award Terms; ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
10.36*
Form of Performance Share Award Terms; ProLogis 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).
10.37*
ProLogis 2000 Share Option Plan for Outside Trustees (as Amended and Restated Effective as of December 31, 2009) (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.13 to ProLogis’ Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008).
10.38*
ProLogis Trust 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated Effective as of September 26, 2002) (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to ProLogis’ Form 8-K dated February 19, 2003).
10.39*
First Amendment of ProLogis 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.2 to ProLogis’ Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2010).
10.40*
ProLogis Deferred Fee Plan for Trustees (As Amended and Restated Effective as of May 14, 2010) (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to ProLogis’ Form 8-K filed on May 19, 2010).
10.41*
Form of Indemnification Agreement between ProLogis and certain directors and executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 8, 2011).
10.42*
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement; Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012).
10.43*
Prologis, Inc. 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2012).
10.44*
Form of Director Deferred Stock Unit Award terms (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 8, 2012).
10.45*
Form of Change of Control and Noncompetition Agreement by and between Prologis, Inc. and its executive officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 16, 2013).
10.46*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (General form 2015) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.57 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.47*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (Bonus exchange) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015).
10.48†*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan LTIP Unit Award Agreement (General form 2016).
10.49*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Outperformance Plan LTIP Unit Exchange Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.58 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.50*
Form of Prologis, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan Equity Exchange Offer LTIP Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.59 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.51*
Amended and Restated Prologis, Inc. 2011 Notional Account Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.60 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.52*
Amended and Restated Prologis, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.53*
Second Amended and Restated Prologis 2005 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.62 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.54*
Time-Sharing Agreement, dated January 21, 2015, by and between ProLogis Logistics Services Incorporated and Hamid R. Moghadam (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.63 to Prologis’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014).
10.55†*
Amended and Restated Time-Sharing Agreement, dated January 11, 2016, by and between ProLogis Logistics Services Incorporated and Hamid R. Moghadam.
10.56
Global Senior Credit Agreement dated as of July 11, 2013, among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., various affiliates of Prologis, L.P., various lenders and agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 15, 2013).
10.57
First Amendment to the Global Senior Credit Agreement dated as of June 26, 2014 among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., various affiliates of Prologis, L.P., various lenders and Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2014).
10.58
Second Amendment to the Global Senior Credit Agreement dated as of January 22, 2015 among Prologis, L.P., various affiliates of Prologis, L.P., various lenders and Bank of America, N.A. as global administrative agent. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2015).
10.59
Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of August 14, 2013 among Prologis Japan Finance Y.K., as initial borrower, Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P., as guarantors, the banks listed on the signature pages thereof, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 16, 2013).
10.60
Guaranty of Payment, dated as of August 14, 2013, among Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P., as guarantors, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as Administrative Agent, for the banks that are from time to time parties to the Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated at August 14, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 16, 2013).
10.61
Senior Term Loan Agreement dated as of June 19, 2014 among Prologis, Inc., Prologis, L.P., various affiliates of Prologis, L.P., various lenders and Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Prologis’ Current Report Form 8-K filed on June 24, 2014).
10.62
Senior Term Loan Agreement dated as of May 28, 2015 among Prologis, L.P., as Borrower, Prologis, Inc., as Guarantor, various lenders and Bank of America N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Prologis’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 1, 2015).
10. 63†
First Amendment, dated January 22, 2015, to the Senior Term Loan Agreement dated as of June 19, 2014, among Prologis, L.P., various affiliates thereof, various lenders and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent.
12.1†
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P.
12.2†
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock/Unit Dividends of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P.
21.1†
Subsidiaries of Prologis, Inc. and Prologis, L.P.
23.1†
Consent of KPMG LLP with respect to Prologis, Inc.
23.2†
Consent of KPMG LLP with respect to Prologis, L.P.
24.1†
Power of Attorney for Prologis, Inc. (included in signature page of this annual report).
24.2†
Power of Attorney for Prologis, L.P. (included in signature page of this annual report).
31.1†
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Prologis, Inc.
31.2†
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Prologis, Inc.
31.3†
Certification of Chief Executive Officer for Prologis, L.P.
31.4†
Certification of Chief Financial Officer for Prologis, L.P.
32.1†
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Prologis, Inc., pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2†
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for Prologis, L.P., pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101. INS†
XBRL Instance Document
101. SCH†
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101. CAL†
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101. DEF†
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101. LAB†
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101. PRE†
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
*
Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement
†
Filed herewith
104