Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025
or
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-33037
PRIMIS FINANCIAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
20-1417448
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
1676 International Drive, Suite 900
McLean, Virginia 22102
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(703) 893-7400
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading symbol
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
FRST
Nasdaq Global Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ◻
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b – 2 of the Exchange Act.:
Large accelerated filer ☐
Accelerated filer ☒
Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issues its audit report. ☒ Yes ☐ No
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2025 was approximately $233.8 million based on the closing price of the common stock on such date.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 27, 2026 was 24,699,185.
DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Parts of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the registrant’s 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Page
Item 1.
Business
6
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
23
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
40
Item 1C.
Cybersecurity
Item 2.
Properties
41
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
42
Item 6.
[Reserved]
44
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
45
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
73
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
141
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.
Other Information
142
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
143
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
144
Item 16.
Form 10-K Summary
147
Signatures
148
2
GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS AND DEFINED TERMS
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as otherwise indicated or the context suggests otherwise, references to the “Company” refers to Primis Financial Corp., and the terms “Primis”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to the Company and its subsidiaries, including Primis Bank, which we refer to as “Primis Bank” or the “Bank.”
“PMC” refers to Primis Mortgage Company, a residential mortgage lender headquartered in Wilmington, North Carolina, a consolidated subsidiary of Primis Bank.
“PFH” refers to Panacea Financial Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas, which owns the rights to the Panacea Financial brand and its intellectual property and partners with the Bank to offer a suite of financial products and services for doctors, their practices, and the broader healthcare industry.
ACL
Allowance for credit losses
AFS
Available-for-sale
ALCO
Asset-Liability Committee
ASC
Accounting Standards Codification
ASU
Accounting Standards Update
Basel III
Basel Committee's 2010 Regulatory Capital Framework
CBLR
Community Bank Leverage Ratio
CECL
Current expected credit losses
CEO
Chief Executive Officer
CFO
Chief Financial Officer
CFPB
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
CIO
Chief Information Officer
CLO
Collateralized Loan Obligations
CMBS
Commercial mortgage backed securities
CMO
Collateralized mortgage obligations
CRA
Community Reinvestment Act
CRO
Chief Risk Officer
DEI
Diversity, equity and inclusion
DIF
Deposit Insurance Fund
Dodd-Frank Act
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
EPS
Earnings per share
ERM
Enterprise Risk Management
ERMC
Enterprise Risk Management Committee
ESG
Environmental, social and governance
EVE
Economic value of equity
FASB
Financial Accounting Standards Board
FDIC
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FDICIA
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991
FHLB
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta
FHLMC
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FNMA
Federal National Mortgage Association
FRB
Federal Reserve Bank
FOMC
Federal Open Market Committee
FVO
Fair value option
GAAP
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
GNMA
Government National Mortgage Association
GSE
Government-sponsored entities
HTM
Held-to-maturity
IRLC
Interest rate lock commitments
IT
Information Technology
3
LHFI
Loans held for investment
LHFS
Loans held for sale
MBS
Mortgage-backed securities
MD&A
NII
Net interest income
NIST
National Institute of Standards and Technology
NASDAQ
National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations
OCC
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
OFAC
Office of Foreign Assets Control
OREO
Other real estate owned
PCA
Prompt corrective action
PCD
Purchased credit deteriorated
PPP
Paycheck Protection Program
PRN
Pro re nata
SABL
Secured Asset Based Lending
SBA
Small Business Administration
SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission
SOFR
Secured Overnight Financing Rate
TBA
To-Be-Announced Mortgage-Backed Securities Trades
TPOS
Third Party Originator/Servicer
VBFI
Virginia Bureau of Financial Institutions
VIE
Variable interest entity
CAUTIONARY NOTE
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains statements about future expectations, activities and events that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of, and subject to the protection of, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided by the same. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts and are instead based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our control. Accordingly, we caution you that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are inherently subject to risks, assumptions and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date made, actual results may prove to be materially different from the results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “forecast,” “should,” “anticipate,” “contemplate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “predict,” “intend,” “continue,” “would,” “could,” “hope,” “might,” “assume,” “objective,” “seek,” “plan,” “strive” or similar words, or the negatives of these words, identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations of future results we express or imply in any forward-looking statements. In addition to the other factors discussed in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, factors that could contribute to those differences include, but are not limited to:
4
5
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results and should not be relied upon as representing management’s views as of any subsequent date. A forward-looking statement may include a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying the forward-looking statement. We believe we have chosen these assumptions or bases in good faith and that they are reasonable. We caution you, however, that assumptions or bases almost always vary from actual results, and the differences between assumptions or bases and actual results can be material. When considering forward-looking statements, you should refer to the risk factors and other cautionary statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our periodic and current reports filed with the SEC for specific factors that could cause our actual results to be different from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (or an earlier date to the extent applicable). Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to publicly updated or revise these forward-looking statements in light of new information or future events.
Item 1. Business
Overview
Primis Financial Corp. is the bank holding company for Primis Bank, a Virginia state-chartered bank which commenced operations on April 14, 2005. Primis Bank provides a range of financial services to individuals and small and medium-sized businesses.
As of December 31, 2025, Primis had $4.0 billion in total assets, $3.3 billion in total loans held for investment, $3.4 billion in total deposits and $423 million in total stockholders’ equity. As of December 31, 2025, Primis Bank had 24 full-service branches in Virginia and Maryland and also provides services to customers through certain online and mobile applications. Headquartered in McLean, Virginia, the Company has an administrative office in Glen Allen, Virginia and an operations center in Atlee, Virginia. PMC, a residential mortgage lender headquartered in Wilmington, North Carolina, is a consolidated subsidiary of Primis Bank. PFH owns the rights to the Panacea Financial brand and its intellectual property and partners with the Bank to offer a suite of financial products and services for doctors, their practices, and ultimately the broader healthcare industry. PFH was deconsolidated from the Company on March 31, 2025, as further
discussed below in “PFH Deconsolidation and Sale of Shares”. The operating results of PFH were included in the Company’s consolidated operating results through March 31, 2025. Primis Bank’s deposits are insured, up to applicable limits, by the FDIC.
We make our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act available free of charge on our website at www.primisbank.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the SEC. These reports are also available without charge on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We include our website address throughout this filing only as textual references. The information contained on our website is not incorporated in this document by reference.
Strategy
Primis is focused on building a new, innovative, and better banking experience for its consumers and small and medium-sized businesses. The Bank intends to grow its business, expand its customer base and improve profitability by focusing on the following three areas:
Critical to executing this approach:
7
BANKING SERVICES
Our principal business is the acquisition of deposits from the general public through our branch offices, digital platform, and deposit intermediaries and the use of these deposits to fund our loan and investment security portfolios. We seek to be a full-service bank that provides a wide variety of financial services to our middle market corporate clients as well as to our retail clients. We are an active commercial lender, and also invest funds in mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, securities issued by agencies of the federal government and obligations of states and political subdivisions.
Lending Activities Overview
Primis offers a wide range of commercial banking services; however, we are focused on making loans secured primarily by commercial real estate and other types of secured and unsecured commercial loans to small and medium-sized businesses in a number of industries, as well as loans to individuals for a variety of purposes, including home equity lines of credit. We are an SBA lender with Preferred Lending Partner status that allows us to offer this program nationwide. We also invest in real estate-related securities, including collateralized mortgage obligations and agency mortgage-backed securities. Our principal sources of funds for loans and investing in securities are deposits and, to a lesser extent, borrowings.
The following is a discussion of each of the major types of lending in which we engage. For more information on our lending activities, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition” (“MD&A”).
Commercial Lending
Commercial Business Lending. These loans consist of lines of credit, revolving credit facilities, demand loans, term loans, equipment loans, SBA loans, stand-by letters of credit, and unsecured loans. Commercial business loans are generally secured by business assets, equipment, accounts receivable, inventory and other collateral, such as readily marketable stocks and bonds with adequate margins, cash value in life insurance policies and savings and time deposits at the Bank.
8
Commercial Real Estate Lending. Commercial real estate lending includes loans for permanent financing. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of loans is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loans to cover operating expenses and debt service. Owner occupied real estate is evaluated in conjunction with the operations of the business.
Construction Lending. Primis provides construction loans for commercial, multi-family, assisted living and other non-residential properties, and builder/developer lines for established companies in our market footprint. Construction loan borrowers are generally pre-qualified for the permanent loan by us or a third party.
Secured Asset Based Lending. Primis has developed a proprietary Asset Based Lending software system that allows the Bank to monitor the collateral of its commercial borrowers who have pledged their working assets (accounts receivables and other qualifying assets such as inventory) as collateral. SABL has the ability to track other offsets (e.g. other loans the customer has with the Bank) to the line of credit. SABL serves to provide more stringent controls and supervision that this type of lending requires.
SBA Lending. Primis has developed expertise in the federally guaranteed SBA programs. The SBA programs provide economic development programs which finance start-up and expansion of small businesses. We are a nationwide Preferred Lender. As an SBA Preferred Lender, our pre-approved status allows us to quickly respond to customers’ needs. Under the SBA program, we generally originate and fund SBA 7(a) and 504 loans. Benefits to Primis are low LTV commercial loans and government guarantees up to 80%.
Panacea Practice Solutions. The Bank, through its Panacea Financial division, provides financing for medical, dental and veterinary businesses. Financing purposes cover a range of borrower needs, including acquisition, start-up, expansion, real estate purchase and refinance, leasehold, equipment financing, as well as practice buy-ins.
Mortgage Warehouse Lending. Primis provides warehouse lending lines of credit to residential mortgage originators. Program parameters and underwriting guidelines are processed and monitored through our Warehouse Loan System to ensure program compliance.
Consumer Lending
Primis offers various types of secured and unsecured consumer loans. We make consumer loans primarily for personal, family or household purposes.
Residential Mortgage. Primis originates residential mortgage loans for its portfolio through PMC. Primis also purchases originated residential mortgages from our Warehouse Line clients, as well as other loan originators. We have no sub-prime loans.
Residential Construction. Primis originates residential construction loans through PMC and other Warehouse Line clients. Primis provides short-term construction management for these loans, which have a permanent mortgage take-out.
Home Equity Lines of Credit. Primis offers credit lines secured by primary residential properties with maximum loan-to-values of 80%. The product provides for a 10 year draw period followed by a 20 year repayment period.
Secured Personal Loans. Primis offers secured personal loans for a variety of purposes including auto, motorcycle, boats, and recreational vehicles. Pledged collateral could also include marketable securities and certificates of deposits.
Life Premium Finance (“LPF”). Primis previously offered life insurance premium financing. These loans were utilized to pay the annual premiums due on whole or universal life policies. These loans were fully secured by the cash value of the policy and personal liquid assets of the borrower or guarantor. We sold a majority of these loans to EverBank, N.A. (“EverBank”) in 2024 and no longer offer these loans as of January 31, 2025. Additional discussion of this sale can be found below in “Lines of Business” and in the MD&A section of this Report.
9
Unsecured Personal Loans. Primis offers unsecured personal loans up to $50,000 and overdraft protection loans up to $10,000, based on specified underwriting criteria. We also offered these types of loans through an agreement with a third-party that sources and originates them for us based on our credit underwriting criteria. In 2024, we made the decision to discontinue the program with the third-party that sources and originates these loans, effective January 31, 2025, and are running-off the existing portfolio on our balance sheet. Additional discussion of this decision can be found in the MD&A.
Panacea Consumer Loans. Panacea Financial offers several unsecured consumer loan products, including student loan refinancing and PRN loans. PRN loans may be utilized by in-school, in-training and in-practice doctors, veterinarians and dentists to fund costs associated with their chosen professions. Strict credit underwriting criteria has been established around these products.
Because future loan losses are so closely intertwined with our underwriting policy, we have instituted what management believes is a stringent loan underwriting policy. Our underwriting guidelines are tailored for particular credit types, including lines of credit, revolving credit facilities, demand loans, term loans, equipment loans, real estate loans, SBA loans, stand-by letters of credit and unsecured loans. We have instituted a no exceptions policy for our consumer credit programs where borrowers must meet all underwriting criteria.
Deposit Activities Overview
We offer a broad range of deposit products, including checking, NOW, savings, and money market accounts and certificates of deposit, supporting the needs of businesses and individuals. We actively pursue business relationships by utilizing the business contacts of our senior management, other bank officers and our directors, thereby capitalizing on our knowledge of our local market areas.
Commercial deposit products are enhanced by a robust suite of treasury and cash management services, including:
Other products and services offered by the Bank include debit cards, ATM services, notary services, and wire transfer.
Lines of Businesses
Panacea Financial. In November 2020, the Company launched the Panacea Financial division, which focuses on providing unique financial products and services for the medical, dental and veterinary communities. Panacea Financial offers personal loans, student debt refinance and practice loans as well as deposit products nationally. Panacea Financial has partnerships with national and state associations. Additionally, its In-Training Medical/Dental School Loan Refinance product allows physicians and dentists that are in training the opportunity to refinance their student debt at a lower interest rate, while benefiting from affordable monthly payments during training. As of December 31, 2025, Panacea Financial had approximately $544 million in outstanding loans. The division has successfully built a nationally-recognized brand
10
with a growing team of industry-leading commercial bankers experienced in providing financial services to its target communities across the United States.
Life Premium Financing. The Company launched a division in the fourth quarter of 2021 focused on financing life insurance premiums for high net-worth individuals across the United States. On October 24, 2024, the Company entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with EverBank for sale of the Company’s LPF division. EverBank acquired LPF from the Company, except for a subset of mostly fixed rate and rate-capped loans that were retained by the Bank and are currently being run-off. All of the LPF operations, including its employees, were assumed by EverBank following the close of the transaction, on January 31, 2025.
Primis Mortgage Company. In May 2022, Primis Bank acquired Primis Mortgage Company (previously SeaTrust Mortgage Company), a regional residential mortgage company headquartered in Wilmington, North Carolina. Primis Mortgage Company has since expanded to offer residential mortgages in the majority of the U.S. Residential mortgage loans originated through Primis Mortgage Company are primarily sold in the secondary market for fee income. During the year ended December 31, 2025, Primis Mortgage originated over $1 billion of loans.
Warehouse Lending. Mortgage warehouse lending involves providing temporary funding to independent mortgage companies that originate residential loans for sale in the secondary market. The loans are predominantly secured by marketable residential mortgages underwritten to agency guidelines. The underlying mortgage is typically funded on the warehouse line for 10 to 15 days before being sold to upstream investors. In October 2024, we hired a seasoned team of mortgage warehouse lenders from another bank that had recently decided to exit the warehouse lending business. This team has grown our warehouse lending business since that time leveraging their years of experience and industry contacts. As of December 31, 2025, we had over $1 billion of commitments with 125 customers.
Digital Banking
In 2021, Primis launched its V1BE service, the first bank delivery app for on-demand ordering of branch services. V1BE brings in-branch banking services directly to the customer, including cash delivery/withdrawals, cash pick-up/deposits, check deposits, change orders, cashier checks, and the instant issue of replacement debit cards. V1BE was initially piloted in the Richmond market but now covers the majority of our footprint, including the greater Washington, D.C. region. With V1BE, Primis is able to support any market and grow customer relationships without the need for a large branch presence. During 2025 we expanded into other markets to support a growing customer base and are implementing enhancements to make V1BE easier to license to other banks and expect to have our first bank customer onboard in 2026.
In 2022, Primis successfully launched its digital bank platform. The platform includes an all-new mobile banking application that provides a quick and seamless account opening process all from within the app. As of December 31, 2025, the balance of digital deposits were $1 billion.
Funding and Revenue Sources
The principal sources of funds for our lending and investment activities are deposits, repayment of loans, prepayments from mortgage-backed securities, repayments of maturing investment securities, FHLB advances and other borrowed money.
Principal sources of revenue are interest and fees on loans and investment securities as well as fee income derived from the maintenance of deposit accounts and income from bank-owned life insurance policies. Our principal expenses include interest paid on deposits, advances from the FHLB, junior subordinated debt, senior subordinated notes and other borrowings, and other operating expenses.
CREDIT ADMINISTRATION
Because future loan losses are so closely intertwined with our underwriting policy, we have instituted what management believes are well-defined loan underwriting criteria and portfolio management practices. Our underwriting
11
guidelines are tailored for individual credit types, including lines of credit, revolving credit facilities, demand loans, term loans, equipment loans, real estate loans, SBA loans, stand-by letters of credit and unsecured loans. We will make extensions of credit based, among other factors, on the potential borrower’s creditworthiness and likelihood of repayment.
The Board of Directors has delegated assignment of individual credit authorities up to $10 million to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Credit Officer. For loans up to $5 million, we have named Credit Officers. We also have a Specialty Executive Credit Officer with extensive industry specific experience with individual credit authority up to $7.5 million. These individual lending authorities are based on the individual’s technical ability and experience. All credits over $10 million are reviewed and approved by the Executive Loan Committee, as defined in our credit policy. For approval of third-party originated loans, we have delegated authority within an approved framework. All credit extensions in excess of 60% of the Bank’s legal lending limit are also reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2025, our legal lending limit was approximately $63 million.
Portfolio management is an integral part of sound credit practices. The responsible relationship manager in conjunction with credit administration will service loan credits through their life cycle. Primis has a dedicated Special Assets team that provides oversight on credit collection activities, to include legal negotiations, forbearance agreements, collateral sale, foreclosures and management of OREO. We believe that coordinated approach to credit supports a high-quality portfolio. Credit Administration is responsible for monthly reporting to the Board of Directors on asset quality and performance.
COMPETITION
The banking business is highly competitive, and our profitability depends principally on our ability to compete in the market areas in which our banking operations are located. We experience substantial competition in attracting and retaining deposits and in lending funds. The primary factors we encounter in competing for deposits are convenient office locations and rates offered. Direct competition for deposits comes from other commercial bank and thrift institutions, money market mutual funds and corporate and government securities which may offer more attractive rates than insured depository institutions are willing to pay. The primary factors we encounter in competing for loans include, among others, interest rate and loan origination fees and the range of services offered. Competition for origination of loans normally comes from other commercial banks, thrift institutions, mortgage bankers, mortgage brokers, insurance companies and fintech or digital lending companies. We have been able to compete effectively with other financial institutions by:
HUMAN CAPITAL
At Primis, we are committed to ensuring that our employees reach their personal, professional and financial peaks. We are attracting, developing, retaining and planning for the succession of key talent and executives to achieve our strategic objectives. Primis is continually investing in our workforce to further emphasize inclusivity and recognizing that diverse perspectives, backgrounds, and experiences strengthen our ability to meet the needs of our associates, communities, clients and shareholders and to foster our employees' growth and career development. As of December 31, 2025, we had 593 employees, nearly all of whom are full-time and of which approximately 63% were female and 23% were minorities. All of our employees are chosen on the basis of their qualifications and merit.
Employee Feedback. Fostering an inclusive environment requires that all employees are heard. Our Intranet contains the “Employee Voice,” which is a vehicle for employees to make suggestions, asks questions or voice opinions regarding the Company’s practices.
Recruitment. While the majority of our employees reside in Virginia, our recruitment efforts are both local and nationwide. We utilize a wide range of recruitment vehicles ranging from college recruitment sites such as “Handshake”, a “V3” program to recruit veterans to posting on popular job boards and conducting nationwide profile searches to find diverse and qualified candidates. Primis realizes that great people know other great people, so we also offer a referral bonus to our employees.
12
Benefits. Primis offers a comprehensive and competitive benefits package to meet a variety of individual needs. We offer three different medical plans, two of which allow the employee to make contributions and receive an employer match on a Health Savings Account. In addition to dental insurance, supplemental insurance and a 401k, we offer employer paid short-term and long-term disability and life insurance. Our employees also enjoy an incentive for participating in our Wellness Program.
Development. All new employees benefit from training to learn how to utilize our key systems. New employees are also required to complete multiple learning modules that cover important compliance and regulatory requirements in the banking industry. Continuing education and advanced training is offered to employees throughout their tenure. We encourage all employees to obtain job related training by covering the cost of the classes and/or learning materials and tests. Our talent acquisition, development and retention focus is on rewarding merit and achievement while nurturing and progressing skilled talent across various business segments.
Volunteerism. Primis is committed to the communities we serve and to supporting our employees in their volunteerism. Each employee receives up to sixteen paid hours to volunteer in their community or charity of choice each year. We maintain a commitment to the prosperity of each community we serve, donating to community, civic and philanthropic organizations in 2025. In addition to providing financial products built for the needs of our customers, we use associate volunteerism and corporate philanthropy to build strong community partnerships. Our employees volunteered 225 hours in 2025.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
This discussion is a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions described below and is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the statutes or regulations applicable to Primis or the Bank. The business of Primis and the Bank is subject to extensive regulation and supervision under federal and state law, including oversight by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”) and the VBFI, a regulatory division of the Virginia State Corporation Commission, as well as applicable regulation by the FDIC.
Changes in laws and regulations may alter the structure, regulation and competitive relationships of financial institutions. In addition, bank regulatory agencies may issue enforcement actions, policy statements, interpretive letters and similar written guidance applicable to us. It cannot be predicted whether and in what form new laws and regulations, or interpretations thereof, may be adopted or the extent to which the business of Primis and the Bank may be affected thereby, but they may have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, and earnings.
Violations of laws and regulations, or other unsafe and unsound practices, may result in regulatory agencies imposing fines or penalties, cease and desist orders, or taking other enforcement actions. Under certain circumstances, these agencies may enforce these remedies directly against officers, directors, employees and other parties participating in the affairs of a bank or bank holding company. Under federal and state laws and regulations pertaining to the safety and soundness of insured depository institutions, federal and state banking regulators have the authority to compel or restrict certain actions on our part if they determine that we have insufficient capital or other resources, or are otherwise operating in a manner that may be deemed to be inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices. Under this authority, our bank regulators can require us or our subsidiaries to enter into informal or formal supervisory agreements, including board resolutions, memoranda of understanding, written agreements and consent or cease and desist orders, pursuant to which we would be required to take identified corrective actions to address cited concerns and to refrain from taking certain actions.
If we become subject to and are unable to comply with the terms of any future regulatory actions or directives, supervisory agreements, or orders, then we could become subject to additional, heightened supervisory actions and orders, possibly including consent orders, prompt corrective action restrictions and/or other regulatory actions, including prohibitions on the payment of dividends on our common stock and preferred stock. If our regulators were to take such additional supervisory actions, then we could, among other things, become subject to significant restrictions on our ability to develop any new business, as well as restrictions on our existing business, and we could be required to raise additional capital, dispose of certain assets and liabilities within a prescribed period of time, or both. The terms of any such
13
supervisory action could have a material negative effect on our business, reputation, operating flexibility, financial condition, and the value of our capital stock.
Supervision, regulation, and examination of Primis, the Bank, and our respective subsidiaries by the appropriate regulatory agencies, as described herein, are intended primarily for the protection of consumers, bank depositors, the DIF of the FDIC, and the U.S. banking and financial system, rather than holders of our capital stock.
Bank Holding Company Regulation
Primis is subject to extensive supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “Bank Holding Company Act”). We are required to file with the Federal Reserve periodic reports and such other information as the Federal Reserve may request. Ongoing supervision is provided through regular examinations by the Federal Reserve and other means that allow the regulators to gauge management’s ability to identify, assess and control risk in all areas of operations in a safe and sound manner and to ensure compliance with laws and regulations. In addition to regulation by the Federal Reserve as a bank holding company, Primis is subject to supervision and regulation by the VBFI under the banking and general business corporation laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Activity Limitations. Primis is registered with the Federal Reserve as a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act and has elected to be a financial holding company. As a financial holding company, Primis is permitted to engage directly or indirectly in a broader range of activities than those permitted for a bank holding company. Bank holding companies generally are limited to the business of banking, managing or controlling banks, and other activities that the Federal Reserve determines to be closely related to banking, or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Bank holding companies are prohibited from acquiring or obtaining control of more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding voting interests of any company that engages in activities other than those activities permissible for bank holding companies. Financial holding companies, such as us, may also engage in activities that are considered to be financial in nature, as well as those incidental or, if so determined by the Federal Reserve, complementary to financial activities. Primis and the Bank must each remain “well-capitalized” and “well-managed” and the Bank must receive a Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) rating of at least “Satisfactory” at its most recent examination in order for the Company to maintain its status as a financial holding company. In addition, the Federal Reserve has the power to order a financial holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any non-banking activity or terminate its ownership or control of any non-bank subsidiary, when it has reasonable cause to believe that continuation of such activity or such ownership or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of any bank subsidiary of that financial holding company. As further described below, each of Primis and the Bank is well-capitalized as of December 31, 2025, and Primis Bank achieved a rating of “Satisfactory” in its most recent CRA evaluation.
Source of Strength Obligations. A bank holding company is required to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary bank. The term “source of financial strength” means the ability of a company, such as us, that directly or indirectly owns or controls an insured depository institution, such as the Bank, to provide financial assistance to such insured depository institution in the event of financial distress. The appropriate federal banking agency for the depository institution (in the case of the Bank, this agency is the Federal Reserve) may require reports from us to assess our ability to serve as a source of strength and to enforce compliance with the source of strength requirements by requiring us to provide financial assistance to the Bank in the event of financial distress. If we were to enter bankruptcy or become subject to the orderly liquidation process established by the Dodd-Frank Act, any commitment by us to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of the Bank would be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee or the FDIC, as appropriate, and entitled to a priority of payment. In addition, the FDIC provides that any insured depository institution generally will be liable for any loss incurred by the FDIC in connection with the default of, or any assistance provided by the FDIC to, a commonly controlled insured depository institution. The Bank is an FDIC-insured depository institution and thus subject to these requirements.
Acquisitions. The Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve or waiver of such prior approval before it (1) acquires ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if, after such acquisition, such bank holding company will own or control more than five percent (5%) of the voting shares of such bank, (2) acquires all of the assets of a bank, or (3) merges with any other bank holding company.
14
In reviewing a proposed covered acquisition, among other factors, the Federal Reserve considers (1) the financial and managerial resources of the companies involved, including pro forma capital ratios; (2) the risk to the stability of the United States banking or financial system; (3) the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, including performance under the CRA; and (4) the effectiveness of the companies in combatting money laundering. The Federal Reserve also reviews any indebtedness to be incurred by a bank holding company in connection with a proposed acquisition to ensure that the bank holding company can service such indebtedness without adversely affecting its ability to serve as a source of strength to its bank subsidiaries. Well capitalized and well managed bank holding companies are permitted to acquire control of banks in any state, subject to federal regulatory approval, without regard to whether such a transaction is prohibited by the laws of any state. However, a bank holding company may not, following an interstate acquisition, control more than 10% of nationwide insured deposits or 30% of deposits within any state in which the acquiring bank operates.
Change in Control. Federal law restricts the amount of voting stock of a bank holding company or a bank that a person (including an entity) may acquire without the prior approval of banking regulators. Under the federal Change in Bank Control Act and the regulations thereunder, a person or group must give advance notice to and obtain approval from the Federal Reserve before acquiring control of any bank holding company, such as Primis. The Change in Bank Control Act creates a rebuttable presumption of control if a person or group acquires the power to vote 10% or more of our outstanding common stock. The overall effect of such laws is to make it more difficult to acquire a bank holding company or a bank by tender offer or similar means than it might be to acquire control of another type of corporation. Consequently, shareholders of the Company may be less likely to benefit from the rapid increases in stock prices that may result from tender offers or similar efforts to acquire control of other companies. Investors should be aware of these requirements when acquiring shares of our stock.
Virginia Law. Certain state corporation laws may have an anti-takeover effect. Virginia law restricts transactions between a Virginia corporation and its affiliates and potential acquirers. The following discussion summarizes the two Virginia statutes that may discourage an attempt to acquire control of Primis.
Virginia Code Sections 13.1-725 – 727.1 govern “Affiliated Transactions.” These provisions, with several exceptions discussed below, require approval by the holders of at least two-thirds of the remaining voting shares of material acquisition transactions between a Virginia corporation and any holder of more than 10% of its outstanding voting shares. Affiliated Transactions include mergers, share exchanges, material dispositions of corporate assets not in the ordinary course of business, any dissolution of the corporation proposed by or on behalf of an interested shareholder, or any reclassification, including a reverse stock split, recapitalization, or merger of the corporation with its subsidiaries which increases the percentage of voting shares owned beneficially by any 10% shareholder by more than 5%.
These provisions were designed to deter certain takeovers of Virginia corporations. In addition, the statute provides that, a corporation's initial articles of incorporation may expressly provide that the corporation shall not be governed by the Affiliated Transactions provisions and that by affirmative vote of a majority of the voting shares other than shares owned by any 10% shareholder, a corporation can adopt an amendment to its articles of incorporation or bylaws providing that the Affiliated Transactions provisions shall not apply to the corporation. Primis “opted out” of the Affiliated Transactions provisions when it incorporated.
Virginia law also provides that shares acquired in a transaction that would cause the acquiring person’s voting strength to meet or exceed any of the three thresholds (20%, 33.33% or 50%) have no voting rights for those shares exceeding that threshold, unless granted by a majority vote of shares not owned by the acquiring person. This provision empowers an acquiring person to require the Virginia Corporation to hold a special meeting of shareholders to consider whether to vote on granting voting rights to control shares within 50 days of the request, unless the acquiring person agrees to another date. Primis also “opted out” of these provisions at the time of its incorporation.
Governance and Financial Reporting Obligations. We are required to comply with various corporate governance and financial reporting requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules and regulations adopted by the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and NASDAQ. In particular, we are required to include management and independent registered public accounting firm reports on internal controls as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K in order to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We have evaluated our controls, including
15
compliance with the SEC rules on internal controls, and have and expect to continue to spend significant amounts of time and money on compliance with these rules. Our failure to comply with these internal control rules may materially adversely affect our reputation, ability to obtain the necessary certifications to financial statements, and the values of our securities.
Incentive Compensation. The Dodd-Frank Act required the federal banking agencies and the SEC to establish joint rules or guidelines for financial institutions with more than $1 billion in assets, such as us and the Bank, which prohibit incentive compensation arrangements that the agencies determine to encourage inappropriate risks by the institution. The federal banking agencies issued proposed rules in 2011 and previously issued guidance on sound incentive compensation policies. In 2016, the federal banking agencies and the SEC proposed rules that would, depending upon the assets of the institution, directly regulate incentive compensation arrangements and would require enhanced oversight and recordkeeping. As of December 31, 2025, these rules have not been implemented. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act required the federal banking agencies and the SEC to issue regulations requiring covered financial institutions to prohibit incentive compensation arrangements that encourage inappropriate risks by providing compensation that is excessive or that could lead to material financial loss to the institution. In October 2022, the SEC adopted final rules implementing the incentive-based compensation recovery (“clawback”) provisions mandated by Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rules directed U.S. stock exchanges to require listed companies to implement, disclose and enforce clawback policies to recover excess incentive-based compensation that current or former executive officers received based on financial reporting measures that are later restated. In June 2023, the SEC approved the proposed clawback listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC, which required Nasdaq-listed companies, to (i) adopt and implement a compliant clawback policy; (ii) file the clawback policy as an exhibit to their annual reports; and (iii) provide certain disclosures relating to any compensation recovery triggered by the clawback policy. Our clawback policy was approved by the board in November 2023 and is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 97 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Shareholder Say-On-Pay Votes. The Dodd-Frank Act requires public companies to take shareholders’ votes on proposals addressing compensation (known as say-on-pay), the frequency of a say-on-pay vote, and the golden parachutes available to executives in connection with change-in-control transactions. Public companies must give shareholders the opportunity to vote on compensation at least every three years and the opportunity to vote on frequency at least every six years, indicating whether the say-on-pay vote should be held annually, biennially, or triennially.
Anti-tying rules. A bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tying arrangements in connection with extensions of credit, leases or sales of property, or furnishing of services.
Capital Requirements
Primis and the Bank are each required under federal law to maintain certain minimum capital levels based on ratios of capital to total assets and capital to risk-weighted assets. The required capital ratios are minimums, and the federal banking agencies may determine that a banking organization, based on its size, complexity, or risk profile, must maintain a higher level of capital in order to operate in a safe and sound manner. Risks such as concentration of credit risks and the risk arising from non-traditional activities, as well as the institution’s exposure to a decline in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates, and an institution’s ability to manage those risks are important factors that are to be considered in assessing an institution’s overall capital adequacy. The following is a brief description of the relevant provisions of these capital rules and their potential impact on our capital levels.
Primis and the Bank are each subject to the following risk-based capital ratios: a common equity Tier 1 ("CET1") risk-based capital ratio, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, which includes CET1 and additional Tier 1 capital, and a total risk-based capital ratio, which includes Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. CET1 is primarily comprised of the sum of common stock instruments and related surplus net of treasury stock, plus retained earnings and certain qualifying minority interests, less certain adjustments and deductions, including with respect to goodwill, intangible assets, mortgage servicing assets and deferred tax assets subject to temporary timing differences. Additional Tier 1 capital is primarily comprised of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, tier 1 minority interests and grandfathered trust preferred securities. Tier 2 capital consists of instruments disqualified from Tier 1 capital, including qualifying subordinated debt, other preferred stock and certain hybrid capital instruments, and a limited amount of loan loss reserves up to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, subject to certain eligibility criteria. The capital rules also define the risk-weights assigned to assets and off-balance
16
sheet items to determine the risk-weighted asset components of the risk-based capital rules, including, for example, certain “high volatility” commercial real estate, past due assets, structured securities and equity holdings.
The leverage capital ratio, which serves as a minimum capital standard, is the ratio of Tier 1 capital to quarterly average total consolidated assets net of goodwill, certain other intangible assets, and certain required deduction items. The required minimum leverage ratio for all banks is 4%.
In addition, effective January 1, 2019, the capital rules require a capital conservation buffer of CET1 of 2.5% above each of the minimum capital ratio requirements (CET1, Tier 1, and total risk-based capital), which is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. These buffer requirements must be met for a bank or bank holding company to be able to pay dividends, engage in share buybacks or make discretionary bonus payments to executive management without restriction.
The FDICIA, among other things, requires the federal bank regulatory agencies to take “prompt corrective action” regarding depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. FDICIA establishes five regulatory capital tiers: “well capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, “undercapitalized”, “significantly undercapitalized”, and “critically undercapitalized”. A depository institution’s capital tier will depend upon how its capital levels compare to various relevant capital measures and certain other factors, as established by regulation. FDICIA generally prohibits a depository institution from making any capital distribution (including payment of a dividend) or paying any management fee to its holding company if the depository institution would thereafter be undercapitalized. The FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive restraints on operations, management and capital distributions, depending on the category in which an institution is classified.
To be well-capitalized, the Bank must maintain at least the following capital ratios:
The Federal Reserve has not yet revised the well-capitalized standard for bank holding companies to reflect the higher capital requirements imposed under the current capital rules. For purposes of the Federal Reserve’s Regulation Y, bank holding companies, such as Primis, must maintain a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater and a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater to be well-capitalized. If the Federal Reserve were to apply the same or a similar well-capitalized standard to bank holding companies as that applicable to the Bank, Primis’ capital ratios as of December 31, 2025 would exceed such revised well-capitalized standard. Also, the Federal Reserve may require bank holding companies, including Primis, to maintain capital ratios substantially in excess of mandated minimum levels, depending upon general economic conditions and a bank holding company’s particular condition, risk profile and growth plans.
Failure to be well-capitalized or to meet minimum capital requirements could result in certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have an adverse material effect on our operations or financial condition. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements could also result in restrictions on Primis’ or the Bank’s ability to pay dividends or otherwise distribute capital or to receive regulatory approval of applications or other restrictions on its growth.
Both Primis and the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios were above the applicable well-capitalized standards and met the capital conservation buffer as of December 31, 2025. Based on current estimates, we believe that Primis and the Bank will continue to exceed all applicable well-capitalized regulatory capital requirements and the capital conservation buffer in 2026.
On October 29, 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule to simplify the regulatory capital requirements for eligible banks and holding companies with less than $10 billion in consolidated assets that opt into the CBLR framework. A qualifying community banking organization with total consolidated assets of less than $10 billion that exceeds the CBLR threshold would be exempt from the agencies’ current capital framework, including the risk-based
17
capital requirements and capital conservation buffer described above, and would be deemed well-capitalized under the agencies’ prompt corrective action regulations. Under the final rule, if a qualifying community banking organization elects to use the CBLR framework, it will be considered “well-capitalized” so long as its CBLR is greater than 9%. Primis does not use the CBLR framework.
Payment of Dividends
Primis is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank and other subsidiaries. Its primary source of cash, other than securities offerings, is dividends from the Bank. Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, no dividends may be paid by an insured bank if the bank is in arrears in the payment of any insurance assessment due to the FDIC. The payment of dividends by the Bank may also be affected by other regulatory requirements and policies, such as the maintenance of adequate capital. If, in the opinion of the applicable regulatory authority, a bank under its jurisdiction is engaged in, or is about to engage in, an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending on the financial condition of the bank, could include the payment of dividends), such authority may require, after notice and hearing, that the bank cease and desist from that practice. The Federal Reserve has formal and informal policies which provide that insured banks should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings.
Under a Federal Reserve policy adopted in 2009, the board of directors of a bank holding company must consider certain factors to ensure that its dividend level is prudent relative to maintaining a strong financial position, and is not based on overly optimistic earnings scenarios, such as potential events that could affect its ability to pay, while still maintaining a strong financial position. As a general matter, the Federal Reserve has indicated that the board of directors of a bank holding company should consult with the Federal Reserve and eliminate, defer or significantly reduce the bank holding company’s dividends if:
Bank Regulation
The operation of the Bank is subject to state and federal statutes applicable to state banks and the regulations of the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the CFPB. The operations of the Bank may also be subject to applicable OCC regulation to the extent state banks are granted parity with national banks. Such statutes and regulations relate to, among other things, required reserves, investments, loans, mergers and consolidations, issuances of securities, payments of dividends, establishment of branches, consumer protection and other aspects of the Bank’s operations. Violations of laws and regulations, or other unsafe and unsound practices, may result in these agencies imposing fines or penalties, cease and desist orders, or taking other enforcement actions. Under certain circumstances, these agencies may enforce these remedies directly against officers, directors, employees and other parties participating in the affairs of a bank or bank holding company.
Safety and Soundness. The Federal Deposit Insurance Act requires the federal prudential bank regulatory agencies, such as the Federal Reserve, to prescribe, by regulation or guideline, operational and managerial standards for all insured depository institutions relating to: (1) internal controls; (2) information systems and audit systems; (3) loan documentation; (4) credit underwriting; (5) interest rate risk exposure; and (6) asset quality. The agencies also must prescribe standards for asset quality, earnings, and stock valuation, as well as standards for compensation, fees and benefits. The federal banking agencies have adopted regulations and Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness to implement these required standards. These guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards used to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. Under the regulations, if a regulator determines that a bank fails to meet any standards prescribed by the guidelines, the regulator may require the bank to
18
submit an acceptable plan to achieve compliance, consistent with deadlines for the submission and review of such safety and soundness compliance plans.
Examinations. The Bank is subject to regulation, reporting, and periodic examinations by the Federal Reserve and the VBFI. These regulatory authorities routinely examine the Bank’s reserves, loan and investment quality, consumer compliance, management policies, procedures and practices and other aspects of operations. The Federal Reserve has adopted the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s rating system and assigns each financial institution a confidential composite rating based on an evaluation and rating of six essential components of an institution’s financial condition and operations, including Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management, Earnings, Liquidity and Sensitivity to Market Risk, as well as the quality of risk management practices.
Consumer Protection. The Dodd-Frank Act established the CFPB, an independent regulatory authority housed within the Federal Reserve having centralized authority, including examination and enforcement authority, for consumer protection in the banking industry. The CFPB has rule writing, examination, and enforcement authority with regard to the Bank’s (and Primis’) compliance with a wide array of consumer financial protection laws, including the Truth in Lending Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (except Sections 615(e) and 628), the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (sections 502 through 509 relating to privacy), among others. The CFPB has broad authority to enforce a prohibition on unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts and practices. Authority to supervise and examine Primis and the Bank for compliance with federal consumer laws remains largely with the Federal Reserve. However, the CFPB may participate in examinations on a “sampling basis” and may refer potential enforcement actions against such institutions to their primary regulators. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act permits states to adopt consumer protection laws and regulations that are stricter than those regulations promulgated by the CFPB, and state attorneys general are permitted to enforce consumer protection rules adopted by the CFPB against certain institutions.
Deposit Insurance Assessments. The DIF of the FDIC insures the deposits of the Bank generally up to a maximum of $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank, for each account ownership category. The FDIC charges insured depository institutions quarterly premiums to maintain the DIF. Deposit insurance assessments are based on average total consolidated assets minus its average tangible equity and take into account certain risk-based financial ratios and other factors. The assessment rate schedule can change from time to time, at the discretion of the FDIC, subject to certain limits.
As of September 30, 2025, the DIF reserve ratio reached 1.40%, exceeding the statutory minimum of 1.35%. The FDIC, as required under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, established a plan on September 15, 2020 to restore the DIF reserve ratio to meet or exceed the statutory minimum of 1.35% within eight years. On October 18, 2022, the FDIC adopted a final plan and increased the initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules uniformly by 2 basis points, beginning in the first quarterly assessment period of 2023. The FDIC could further increase the deposit insurance assessments for certain insured depository institutions, including Primis Bank, if the DIF reserve ratio is not maintained.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by a bank’s federal regulatory agency. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that, in the event of the liquidation or other resolution of an insured depository institution, the claims of depositors of the institution, including the claims of the FDIC as subrogee of insured depositors, and certain claims for administrative expenses of the FDIC as a receiver, will have priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution, including those of the parent bank holding company.
Insider Transactions. The Federal Reserve has adopted regulations that restrict preferential loans and loan amounts to “affiliates” and “insiders” of banks, require banks to keep information on loans to major shareholders and executive officers, and bar certain director and officer interlocks between financial institutions.
Reserves. The Bank is subject to Federal Reserve regulations that require the Bank to maintain reserves against transaction accounts (primarily checking accounts). These reserve requirements are subject to annual adjustment by the
19
Federal Reserve. Effective March 26, 2020, reserve requirement ratios were reduced to zero percent and remain at that level as of December 31, 2025.
Anti-Money Laundering. A continued focus of governmental policy relating to financial institutions in recent years has been combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The USA PATRIOT Act broadened the application of anti-money laundering regulations to apply to additional types of financial institutions such as broker-dealers, investment advisors and insurance companies, and strengthened the ability of the U.S. Government to help prevent, detect and prosecute international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The principal provisions of Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act require that regulated financial institutions, including state member banks: (i) establish an anti-money laundering program that includes training and audit components; (ii) comply with regulations regarding the verification of the identity of any person seeking to open an account; (iii) take additional required precautions with non-U.S. owned accounts; and (iv) perform certain verification and certification of money laundering risk for their foreign correspondent banking relationships. Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA PATRIOT Act’s requirements could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution. Primis Bank has augmented its systems and procedures to meet the requirements of these regulations and will continue to revise and update its policies, procedures and controls to reflect changes required by law.
FinCEN has adopted rules that require financial institutions to obtain beneficial ownership information with respect to legal entities with which such institutions conduct business, subject to certain exclusions and exemptions. Bank regulators are focusing their examinations on anti-money laundering compliance, and we continue to monitor and augment, where necessary, our anti-money laundering compliance programs.
Bank regulators routinely examine institutions for compliance with these anti-money laundering obligations and have been active in imposing “cease and desist” and other regulatory orders and money penalty sanctions against institutions found to be in violation of these requirements. In 2024, US federal regulators proposed amendments to modernize Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) program requirements. Aligned with the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, the rules mandate a risk-based approach requiring institutions to identify, evaluate, and document risks based on business activities and national priorities.
Economic Sanctions. The OFAC is responsible for helping to ensure that U.S. entities do not engage in transactions with certain prohibited parties, as defined by various Executive Orders and acts of Congress. OFAC publishes, and routinely updates, lists of names of persons and organizations suspected of aiding, harboring or engaging in terrorist acts, including the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List. If we find a name on any transaction, account or wire transfer that is on an OFAC list, we must undertake certain specified activities, which could include blocking or freezing the account or transaction requested, and we must notify the appropriate authorities.
Concentrations in Lending. During 2006, the federal bank regulatory agencies released guidance on “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending” (the “Guidance”) and advised financial institutions of the risks posed by CRE lending concentrations. The Guidance requires that appropriate processes be in place to identify, monitor and control risks associated with real estate lending concentrations. Higher allowances for credit losses and capital levels may also be required. The Guidance is triggered when CRE loan concentrations exceed either:
The Guidance also applies when a bank has a sharp increase in CRE loans or has significant concentrations of CRE secured by a particular property type.
Community Reinvestment Act. The Bank is subject to the provisions of the CRA, which imposes a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with their safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of entire communities where the bank accepts deposits, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The Federal Reserve’s assessment of the Bank’s CRA record is made available to the public. Further, a less than satisfactory CRA rating will slow, if not
20
preclude, expansion of banking activities and prevent a company from becoming or remaining a financial holding company. Federal CRA regulations require, among other things, that evidence of discrimination against applicants on a prohibited basis, and illegal or abusive lending practices be considered in the CRA evaluation. In 2023 the Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC issued a final rule to modernize their respective CRA regulations. The revised rules would substantially alter the methodology for assessing compliance with the CRA, with material aspects taking effect January 1, 2026 and revised data reporting requirements taking effect January 1, 2027. The revised CRA regulations have been subject to an injunction since March 29, 2024. On July 16, 2025, the Federal Reserve, OCC, and FDIC issued a joint proposal to rescind the 2023 modernization rule. The agencies continue to apply the CRA rules as they existed before the 2023 modernization, considering the injunction and pending finalization of the recission of the modernization rule.
Consumer Regulation. Activities of the Bank are subject to a variety of statutes and regulations designed to protect consumers. These laws and regulations include, among numerous other things, provisions that:
Mortgage Rules. Pursuant to rules adopted by the CFPB, banks that make residential mortgage loans are required to make a good faith determination that a borrower has the ability to repay a mortgage loan prior to extending such credit, require that certain mortgage loans contain escrow payments, obtain new appraisals under certain circumstances, comply with integrated mortgage disclosure rules, and follow specific rules regarding the compensation of loan originators and the servicing of residential mortgage loans.
Transactions with affiliates. There are various restrictions that limit the ability of the Bank to finance, pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to Primis or other affiliates. In addition, banks are subject to certain restrictions under Section 23A and B of the Federal Reserve Act on certain transactions, including any extension of credit to its bank holding company or any of its other affiliates, on investments in the securities thereof, and on the taking of such securities as collateral for loans to any borrower.
Privacy and Cybersecurity. The Bank is subject to federal and state banking regulations that limit its ability to disclose non-public information about consumers to non-affiliated third parties. These limitations require us to periodically disclose our privacy policies to consumers and allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to a non-affiliated third party under certain circumstances. Consumers also have the option to direct banks and other financial institutions not to share information about transactions and experiences with affiliated companies for the purpose of marketing products or services. Banking institutions are required to implement a comprehensive information security program that includes administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information. These security and privacy policies and procedures for the protection of confidential and personal information are in effect across our lines of business. Furthermore, the federal banking regulators regularly issue guidance regarding cybersecurity intended to enhance cyber risk management. A financial institution is expected to implement multiple lines of defense against cyber-attacks and ensure that their risk management procedures address the risk posed by potential cyber threats. A financial institution is further expected to maintain procedures to effectively respond to a cyber-attack and resume operations following any such attack. Primis has adopted and implemented policies and procedures to comply with these privacy, information security, and cybersecurity requirements. The federal banking agencies require banks to notify their regulators within 36 hours of a “computer-security incident” that rises to the level of a “notification incident.”
Non-Discrimination Policies. Primis Bank is also subject to, among other things, the provisions of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act, both of which prohibit discrimination based on race or color, religion, national
21
origin, sex, and familial status in any aspect of a consumer or commercial credit or residential real estate transaction. The Department of Justice, and the federal bank regulatory agencies have issued an Interagency Policy Statement on Discrimination in Lending that provides guidance to financial institutions in determining whether discrimination exists, how the agencies will respond to lending discrimination, and what steps lenders might take to prevent discriminatory lending practices. The Department of Justice has increased its efforts to prosecute what it regards as violations of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Federal Housing Administration.
Audit Reports. Effective January 1, 2026, certain changes in FDICIA audit requirements took effect. Insured institutions with total assets of $1 billion or more, such as the Bank, must submit annual audit reports prepared by independent auditors to federal and state regulators. In some instances, the audit report of the institution’s holding company can be used to satisfy this requirement. Independent auditors must receive examination reports, supervisory agreements and reports of enforcement actions. Further, the Bank’s audit committee must be comprised of mainly independent members.
The Bank is no longer subject to certain requirements under the changes. Under the revised thresholds, for insured institutions with total assets of $5 billion or more, financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, management’s certifications concerning responsibility for the financial statements, internal controls and compliance with legal requirements designated by the FDIC, and an attestation by the independent auditor regarding the statements of management relating to the internal controls must be submitted. Further, independent auditors may be required to review quarterly financial statements, and such institutions must have independent audit committees consisting of outside directors only, must also include members with experience in banking or financial management, must have access to outside counsel, and must not include representatives of large customers.
The foregoing is only a brief summary of certain statutes, rules, and regulations that may affect Primis and the Bank. Numerous other statutes and regulations also will have an impact on the operations of Primis and the Bank. Supervision, regulation and examination of banks by the regulatory agencies are intended primarily for the protection of depositors, not shareholders.
22
Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock involves risks. The following is a description of the material risks and uncertainties that Primis Financial Corp. believes affect its business and should be considered before making an investment in our common stock. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently deem immaterial, also may become important factors that affect us and our business. If any of the risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K were to actually occur, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. If this were to happen, the value of our common stock could decline significantly and you could lose part or all of your investment. This Form 10-K also contains forward-looking statements that may not be realized as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, the risks described herein and in our other public filings with the SEC. Please refer to the section in this Form 10-K entitled “Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for additional information regarding forward-looking statements.
Summary
Our business is subject to a number of risks, including risks that may prevent us from achieving our business objectives or may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects. These risks are discussed more fully after the summary, and risks include, but are not limited to, the following:
24
Credit Risks
We are subject to risks related to our concentration of commercial real estate and construction and land development loans.
As of December 31, 2025, we had $1.2 billion of commercial real estate loans outstanding, or 37% of our loan portfolio, including multi-family residential loans and loans secured by farmland. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts, and the repayment is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loan to cover operating expenses and debt service. As of December 31, 2025, we had $42 million in nonperforming commercial real estate loans.
As of December 31, 2025, we had $132 million of construction and land development loans outstanding, or 4% of our loan portfolio. Construction and land development loans are subject to risks during the construction phase that are not present in standard residential real estate and commercial real estate loans. These risks include:
Real estate construction and land development loans may involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project rather than the ability of a borrower or guarantor to repay the loan and also present risks of default in the event of declines in property values or volatility in the real estate market during the construction phase. Our practice, in the majority of instances, is to secure the personal guaranty of individuals in support of our real estate construction and land development loans which provides us with an additional source of repayment. As of December 31, 2025, we did not have any nonperforming construction and land development loans. However, if one or more of our larger borrowers were to default on their construction and land development loans and we did not have alternative sources of repayment through personal guarantees or other sources, or if any of the aforementioned risks were to occur, we could incur significant losses.
We have a meaningful amount of consumer loans that are unsecured and if the borrower defaults on the loan, we have no collateral to recover potential losses.
Our unsecured consumer loan portfolio balance is $183 million, or approximately 6% of our total held for investment loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2025. Included in this portfolio is $90 million of loans sourced based on our credit underwriting criteria and managed by a third party. Consumer loan repayment is primarily driven by the borrower’s personal income, which is impacted by various factors that are outside of the control of the borrower, including macroeconomic conditions such as inflation and fluctuating interest rates. A downturn in the economy or job losses could impact a borrower’s ability to make loan payments. Each of these factors could cause a borrower to evaluate their debts and prioritize payments of other debts above consumer loans due to us. If macroeconomic conditions and the economy worsen, borrowers may stop paying their loans, which could in turn require us to increase our provision for credit losses and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
A portion of our consumer loan portfolio is originated and serviced by a third-party and includes a credit enhancement, which may not be realizable; the inability to utilize such credit enhancement could be detrimental to our financial condition and results of operations.
We receive credit enhancement from a third-party managing $90 million of consumer loans that are recorded on our balance sheet in held for investment as of December 31, 2025. The credit enhancement is primarily provided through cash flows derived from loan originations. We elected on December 31, 2024 to discontinue originations of these loans, effective January 31, 2025. As a result, our monthly cash receipts related to this credit enhancement ceased, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations while loan balances in this portfolio run-off.
25
A significant amount of our third-party serviced consumer loans were originated during a zero-interest promotional period, exposing us to third-party credit risk for interest foregone in the event of borrower prepayment; the failure of such third-party to perform under its reimbursement obligation could be detrimental to our financial condition and results of operations.
Within our $90 million third-party originated and serviced consumer loan portfolio, there is $3 million of the portfolio that is in a promotional zero interest rate period as of December 31, 2025. The loans in these promotional interest periods legally accrue interest at the stated rate of the note agreement, but the interest is not required to be paid during the promotional period. Further, if the borrower repays all of the principal on the note prior to the end of the promotional period the accrued interest is waived, but if there is any principal balance remaining at the end of the promotional period the borrower must repay all of the interest that has accrued. As of December 31, 2025, the amount of deferred interest on these loans was $390 thousand. Through an agreement with the third-party servicer, we are entitled to payment of all accrued interest that is waived on loans that repay all principal within the promotional period. If a high percentage of these loans repay at or before the end of their promotional period, a large amount of interest reimbursement will be due from the third-party servicer. If the third-party servicer cannot reimburse us, we may not be able to realize any income on these loans in our portfolio.
As of December 31, 2025, we had $10 million aggregate receivable on our balance sheet due from the third-party related to prior reimbursements of interest on promotional loans where borrowers paid in full prior to the end of the promotional period. Of this amount, $8 million is included in a commercial loan extended to the third-party under our normal loan origination and credit underwriting process to allow the third-party a deferred payment schedule to support their operational and cash flow needs. Should the third party be unable to make the scheduled payments under this commercial loan once they become due or be unable to pay the $2 million trade receivable due, it may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
A significant amount of our loans are secured by real estate and any declines in real estate values in our primary markets could be detrimental to our financial condition and results of operations.
Real estate lending (including commercial, construction, land development, and residential loans) is a large portion of our loan portfolio, constituting $2.0 billion, or approximately 61% of our total loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2025. Although residential and commercial real estate values are currently strong in our market area, such values may not remain elevated. If loans that are collateralized by real estate become troubled during a time when market conditions are declining or have declined, then we may not be able to realize the full value of the collateral that we anticipated at the time of loan origination, which could require us to increase our provision for credit losses and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
As of December 31, 2025, 37% of our loan portfolio was comprised of loans secured by commercial real estate, including multi-family residential loans and loans secured by farmland. As of December 31, 2025, $639 million, or approximately 19% of our total loans, were secured by single-family residential real estate. This includes $577 million in residential 1-4 family loans and $62 million in home equity lines of credit. If housing prices in our market areas do not remain strong or deteriorate, we may experience an increase in nonperforming loans, provision for credit losses and charge-offs. If we are required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan to satisfy the debt during a period of reduced real estate values, our earnings and capital could be adversely affected.
If our nonperforming assets increase, our earnings will suffer.
As of December 31, 2025, our nonperforming assets (which consist of nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days and accruing and OREO) totaled $87 million, or 3% of total loans and OREO, which is an increase of $70 million, or 417%, compared with nonperforming assets of $17 million, or 1% of total loans and OREO, as of December 31, 2024.
Economic and market conditions have been unstable recently, and although we believe that our nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans and OREO remains manageable, we may incur losses if there is an increase in nonperforming assets in the future. Our nonperforming assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. We do not record interest income on nonaccrual loans or OREO, thereby adversely affecting our net interest income, and increasing loan
26
administration costs. When we take collateral in foreclosures and similar proceedings, we are required to mark the related loan to the then fair value of the collateral, which may ultimately result in a loss. We must reserve for expected losses, which is established through a current period charge to the provision for credit losses as well as from time to time, as appropriate, a write down of the value of properties in our OREO portfolio to reflect changing market values. Additionally, there are legal fees associated with the resolution of problem assets as well as carrying costs such as taxes, insurance and maintenance related to our OREO. Further, the resolution of nonperforming assets requires the active involvement of management, which can distract them from more profitable activity. Finally, an increase in the level of nonperforming assets increases our regulatory risk profile. There can be no assurance that we will not experience future increases in nonperforming assets, which could negatively impact our earnings.
If our allowance for credit losses is not adequate to cover actual loan losses, our earnings will decrease.
As a lender, we are exposed to the risk that our borrowers may not repay their loans according to the terms of these loans, and the collateral securing the payment of these loans may be insufficient to ensure repayment. We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of the borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. The amount of the allowance represents management's best estimate of current expected credit losses on loans considering available information, from internal and external sources, relevant to assessing collectability over the loans' contractual terms, adjusted for expected prepayments when appropriate. If our assumptions prove to be incorrect or if we experience significant loan losses, our current allowance may not be sufficient to cover actual loan losses and adjustments may be necessary to allow for different economic conditions or adverse developments in our loan portfolio. A material addition to the allowance for credit losses could cause our earnings to decrease. Due to the relatively unseasoned nature of portions of our loan portfolio, we may experience an increase in delinquencies and losses as these loans continue to mature.
In addition, federal regulators periodically review our allowance for credit losses and may require us to increase our provision for credit losses or recognize further charge-offs, based on judgments different from those of our management. Any significant increase in our allowance for credit losses or charge-offs required by these regulatory agencies would result in a decrease in net income and capital and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to credit quality risks and our credit policies may not be sufficient to avoid losses.
We are subject to the risk of losses resulting from the failure of borrowers, guarantors and related parties to pay interest and principal amounts on their loans. Although we maintain credit policies and credit underwriting, monitoring and collection procedures, these policies and procedures may not prevent losses, particularly during periods in which the local, regional or national economy suffers a general decline. If borrowers fail to repay their loans, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely affected.
Our mortgage revenue is cyclical and is sensitive to the level of interest rates, changes in economic conditions, decreased economic activity, and slowdowns in the housing market, any of which could adversely impact our profits.
The Bank originates residential mortgage loans through PMC, which lends to borrowers nationwide. The success of our mortgage business is dependent upon its ability to originate loans and sell them to investors, in each case at or near current volumes. Loan production levels are sensitive to changes in the level of interest rates and changes in economic conditions. Loan production levels may suffer if we experience a slowdown in housing markets, tightening credit conditions or increasing interest rates. Any sustained period of decreased activity caused by fewer refinancing transactions, higher interest rates, housing price pressure, or loan underwriting restrictions would adversely affect our mortgage originations and, consequently, could significantly reduce our income from mortgage activities. As a result, these conditions would also adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Deteriorating economic conditions may also cause home buyers to default on their mortgages. In certain cases, where we have originated loans and sold them to investors, we may be required to repurchase loans or provide a financial settlement to investors if it is proven that the borrower failed to provide full and accurate information on, or related to, their loan application, if appraisals for such properties have not been acceptable or if the loan was not underwritten in
27
accordance with the loan program specified by the loan investor. In the ordinary course of business, we record an indemnification reserve relating to mortgage loans previously sold based on historical statistics and loss rates. If such reserves were insufficient to cover claims from investors, such repurchases or settlements would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Market Risks
Our profitability depends significantly on local economic conditions in the areas where our operations and loans are concentrated, and our geographic concentration makes us vulnerable to local weather catastrophes, public health issues, and other external events, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We operate in a mixed market environment with influences from both rural and urban areas. Our profitability depends on the general economic conditions in our market areas of Northern Virginia, Maryland, Washington, D.C., Charlottesville, Northern Neck, Middle Peninsula, Richmond, Hampton Roads and the surrounding areas. Unlike larger banks that are more geographically diversified, we provide banking and financial services to clients primarily in these market areas. As of December 31, 2025, a significant portion of our commercial real estate, real estate construction and residential real estate loans were made to borrowers in our market area. The local economic conditions in this area have a significant impact on our commercial, real estate and construction and consumer loans, the ability of the borrowers to repay these loans and the value of the collateral securing these loans. In addition, if the population or income growth in these market areas slows, stops or declines, income levels, deposits and housing starts could be adversely affected and could result in the curtailment of our expansion, growth and profitability. Political conditions, including a change in presidential administrations and related policies, executive orders, and laws, could also impact our earnings.
Our earnings are subject to interest rate risk.
Our earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest earning assets such as loans and securities and interest expense paid on interest bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowed funds. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including the rate of inflation, general economic conditions and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies (in particular, the Federal Reserve). From July 2023 through August of 2024, the federal funds rate remained steady at 5.25% to 5.50%. In each of the third and fourth quarters of 2024, the Federal Reserve reduced the target federal funds rate by 50 basis points to 4.25% to 4.50%. In the third quarter of 2025, the Federal Reserve reduced the target federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 4.00% to 4.25%. In the fourth quarter of 2025, the Federal Reserve reduced the target federal funds rate by 50 basis points to 3.50% to 3.75%. Uncertainty regarding future rates could negatively impact our cost of borrowing and reduce the amount of money our customers borrow or adversely affect their ability to repay outstanding loan balances that may increase due to adjustments in their variable rates.
Changes in monetary policy, interest rates, the yield curve, or market risk spreads, or a prolonged, flat or inverted yield curve could influence not only the interest we receive on loans and securities and the amount of interest we pay on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect:
If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, our net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings.
28
Any substantial, unexpected or prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Unstable global economic conditions may have serious adverse consequences on our business, financial condition, and operations.
We are operating in an uncertain economic environment. The global credit and financial markets have experienced extreme volatility and disruptions over the past few years, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, increases in unemployment rates, high rates of inflation, and uncertainty about economic stability and a potential recession. The U.S. government's decisions regarding appointments at the Federal Reserve, its debt ceiling and the possibility that the U.S. could default on its debt obligations may cause further interest rate adjustments, disrupt access to capital markets, and deepen recessionary conditions. Further, disagreements between the U.S. and significant trading partners over economic or political matters such as international trade may result in new or continued sanctions, tariffs and other similar restrictions on trade and investment between countries, which may result in supply chain disruptions and increased costs that could negatively affect us, our customers and our counterparties. In addition, conflicts between countries such as the Russian military action against Ukraine and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, could lead to regional instability, a rise in commodity prices, increase inflationary pressures and market volatility, and thereby have an indirect effect on us even when we do not have material exposure to such countries. While our management team continually monitors market conditions and economic factors, throughout our footprint, we are unable to predict the duration or severity of such conditions or factors. If conditions were to worsen nationally, regionally, or locally, then we could see a sharp increase in our total net charge-offs and also be required to significantly increase our allowance for credit losses. Furthermore, the demand for loans and our other products and services could decline. An increase in our non-performing assets and related increases in our provision for loan losses, coupled with a potential decrease in the demand for loans and other products and services, could negatively affect our business and could have a material adverse effect on our capital, financial condition, results of operations, and future growth.
The U.S. government announced changes to its trade policies in 2025 and significantly increased tariffs on certain imports under emergency authorities, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”). In February 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. The current tariff environment remains dynamic and uncertain, including regarding potential refunds of tariffs paid under IEEPA, and the U.S. government could respond with replacement measures under other legal authorities. Replacement measures and changes to tariffs and other trade restrictions may lead to continuing uncertainty and volatility in the U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions which could cause adverse changes in the availability, terms and cost of capital. Additionally, potential tariffs or other U.S. trade policy measures have triggered and may trigger additional retaliatory actions by other countries such as China. Increased tariffs and trade restrictions may cause the prices of our customers’ products to increase, which could reduce demand for such products, or reduce our customers’ margins, and adversely impact their revenues, financial results, and ability to service debt, which in turn, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our clients may also be adversely impacted by changes in regulatory and tax policies and laws, all of which could reduce demand for loans and adversely impact our borrowers' ability to repay our loans.
There can be no assurance that further deterioration in markets and confidence in economic conditions will not occur. Our general business strategy may be adversely affected by any such economic downturn or recession, volatile business environment, hostile third-party action, or continued unpredictable and unstable market conditions. The effects of any economic downturn or recession could continue for many years after the downturn or recession is considered to have ended.
Declines in asset values may result in impairment charges and adversely affect the value of our investment securities, financial performance and capital.
We maintain an investment securities portfolio that includes, but is not limited to, collateralized mortgage obligations, agency mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities. The market value of investment securities may be affected by factors other than the underlying performance of the issuer or composition of the bonds themselves, such as ratings downgrades, adverse changes in the business climate and a lack of liquidity for resales of certain investment securities. At
29
each reporting period, we evaluate investment securities and other assets for impairment indicators. We may be required to record impairment charges in our income statements through an allowance for credit losses if our investment securities suffer a decline in value below their amortized cost. In 2025, we did not experience any impairment of our investment securities. If in future periods we determine that a significant impairment has occurred, we would be required to charge against earnings the credit-related portion of the impairment, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations in the periods in which the impairments occur.
Our stock price can be volatile.
Stock price volatility may make it more difficult for you to resell your common stock when you want and at prices you find attractive. Our stock price can fluctuate significantly in response to a variety of factors including, among other things:
General market fluctuations, industry factors and general economic and political conditions and events, such as economic slowdowns or recessions, interest rate changes or credit loss trends, could also cause our stock price to decrease regardless of operating results.
The trading volume in our common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies.
Although our common stock is listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Market, the trading volume is low, and you are not assured liquidity with respect to transactions in our common stock. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of our common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which we have no control. Given the lower trading volume of our common stock, significant sales of our common stock, or the expectation of these sales, could cause our stock price to fall.
Inflation could negatively impact our business, our profitability and our stock price.
Prolonged periods of inflation may impact our profitability by negatively impacting our fixed costs and expenses, including increasing funding costs and expense related to talent acquisition and retention, and negatively impacting the demand for our products and services. Additionally, inflation may lead to a decrease in consumer and client’s purchasing power and negatively affect the need or demand for our products and services. If significant inflation continues, our business could be negatively affected by, among other things, decreases in loan collateral values and increased default rates leading to credit losses which could decrease our appetite for new credit extensions. These inflationary pressures could result in missed earnings and budgetary projections causing our stock price to suffer.
ESG and DEI risks could adversely affect our reputation and shareholder, employee, client, and third party relationships and may negatively affect our stock price.
Our business faces increasing public, investor, activist, legislative and regulatory scrutiny related to ESG, anti-ESG, DEI and anti-DEI activities and developments. We risk damage to our brand and reputation if we fail to act responsibly in
30
a number of areas, such as DEI, environmental stewardship, including with respect to climate change, human capital management, support for our local communities, corporate governance, and transparency, or fail to consider ESG factors in our business operations.
Furthermore, as a result of our diverse base of clients and business partners, we may face potential negative publicity based on the identity of our clients or business partners and the public’s (or certain segments of the public’s) view of those entities. Such publicity may arise from traditional media sources or from social media and may increase rapidly in size and scope. If our client or business partner relationships were to become intertwined in such negative publicity, our ability to attract and retain clients, business partners, and employees may be negatively impacted, and our stock price may also be negatively impacted. Additionally, we may face pressure not to do business in certain industries that are viewed as harmful to the environment or are otherwise negatively perceived, which could impact our growth.
Additionally, investors and shareholder advocates are placing ever increasing emphasis on how corporations address ESG issues in their business strategy when making investment decisions and when developing their investment theses and proxy recommendations. We may incur meaningful costs with respect to our ESG efforts and if such efforts are negatively perceived, our reputation and stock price may suffer.
In response to ESG developments (including, in particular, DEI initiatives), there are increasing instances of anti-ESG legislation and anti-DEI executive orders, adverse media coverage, regulation, and litigation that could have unintended impacts on ordinary banking operations and increase litigation or reputational risk related to actions we choose to take and impact the results of our operations. If legislatures in the states in which we operate or Congress adopts legislation intended to protect certain industries by limiting or prohibiting consideration of business and industry factors in lending activities, certain portions of our lending operations may be impacted.
Operational Risks
Our business strategy includes strategic growth, and our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail to manage our growth effectively.
We intend to continue pursuing a growth strategy for our business. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by growing companies such as the continuing need for infrastructure and personnel, the time and costs inherent in integrating a series of different operations and the ongoing expense of acquiring and staffing new lines of business or branches. We may not be able to expand our presence in our existing markets or successfully enter new markets, and any expansion could adversely affect our results of operations. Failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, future prospects, financial condition or results of operations, and could adversely affect our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. Our ability to grow successfully will depend on a variety of factors, including the continued availability of desirable business opportunities, the competitive responses from other financial institutions in our market areas, and our ability to manage our growth.
Although there can be no assurance of success or the availability of branch or financial services acquisitions in the future, we may seek to supplement our internal growth through attractive acquisitions. We cannot predict the number, size or timing of acquisitions, or whether any such acquisition will occur at all. Our acquisition efforts have traditionally focused on targeted entities in markets in which we currently operate and markets in which we believe we can compete effectively. However, as consolidation of the financial services industry continues, the competition for suitable acquisition candidates may increase and, as the number of appropriate targets decreases, the prices for potential acquisitions could increase, which could reduce our potential returns and reduce the attractiveness of these opportunities to us. We may compete with other financial services companies for acquisition opportunities, that may have greater financial resources than we do and may be able to pay more for an acquisition than we are able or willing to pay.
We must respond to rapid technological changes and these changes may be more difficult or expensive than anticipated.
The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services including those related to or involving artificial intelligence, machine learnings, blockchain and other distributed ledger technologies. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and
31
enables financial institutions to better serve customers and reduce costs. Our future success depends, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers, and even if we implement such products and services, we may incur substantial costs in doing so. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological changes affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
New lines of business, products or services and technological advancements may subject us to additional risks.
From time to time, we implement new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There are substantial risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed. In developing and marketing new lines of business and/or new products and services we invest significant time and resources. Initial timetables for the introduction and development of new lines of business and/or new products or services may not be achieved, and price and profitability targets may not prove feasible. External factors, such as compliance with regulations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service.
The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological change with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services (including those related to or involving artificial intelligence, machine learning, blockchain and other distributed ledger technologies), and an established and growing demand for mobile and other phone and computer banking applications. Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to address the needs of our customers by using technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. Many of our competitors may have substantially greater resources to invest in technological improvements. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. In addition, our implementation of certain new technologies, such as those related to artificial intelligence, automation and algorithms, in our business processes may have unintended consequences due to their limitations or our failure to use them effectively. In addition, cloud technologies are also critical to the operation of our systems, and our reliance on cloud technologies is growing. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Furthermore, any new line of business, new products or service and/or new technology could have a significant impact on the effectiveness of our system of internal controls. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business, new products or services and/or new technologies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The development and use of artificial intelligence (AI) presents risks and challenges that may adversely impact our business.
We or our third-party (or fourth party) vendors, clients or counterparties may develop or incorporate AI technology in certain business processes, services, or products. The development and use of AI present a number of risks and challenges to our business. The legal and regulatory environment relating to AI is uncertain and rapidly evolving, both in the U.S. and internationally, and includes regulatory schemes targeted specifically at AI as well as provisions in intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, employment, and other laws applicable to the use of AI. These evolving laws and regulations could require changes in our implementation of AI technology and increase our compliance costs and the risk of non-compliance. AI models, particularly generative AI models, may produce output or take action that is incorrect, that reflects biases included in the data on which they are trained, that results in the release of private, confidential, or proprietary information, that infringes on the intellectual property rights of others, or that is otherwise harmful. In addition, the complexity of many AI models makes it difficult to understand why they are generating particular outputs. This limited transparency increases the challenges associated with assessing the proper operation of AI models, understanding and monitoring the capabilities of the AI models, reducing erroneous output, eliminating bias, and complying with regulations that require documentation or explanation of the basis on which decisions are made. Further, we may rely on AI models
32
developed by third parties, and, to that extent, would be dependent in part on the manner in which those third parties develop and train their models, including risks arising from the inclusion of any unauthorized material in the training data for their models and the effectiveness of the steps these third parties have taken to limit the risks associated with the output of their models, matters over which we may have limited visibility. Any of these risks could expose us to liability or adverse legal or regulatory consequences and harm our reputation and the public perception of our business or the effectiveness of our security measures.
We may not be able to successfully integrate our acquisitions or to realize the anticipated benefits of them.
A successful integration of each acquired business with ours will depend substantially on our ability to successfully consolidate operations, corporate cultures, systems and procedures and to eliminate redundancies and costs. While we have substantial experience in successfully integrating institutions we have acquired, we may encounter difficulties during integration, such as:
all of which could divert resources from regular banking operations. Additionally, general market and economic conditions or governmental actions affecting the financial industry generally may inhibit our successful merger integrations.
Further, we acquire businesses with the expectation that these mergers or acquisitions will result in various benefits including, among other things, benefits relating to enhanced revenues, a strengthened market position for the combined company, cross-selling opportunities, technology, cost savings and operating efficiencies. Achieving the anticipated benefits of these mergers and acquisitions is subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether we integrate these institutions in an efficient and effective manner, and general competitive factors in the marketplace. Failure to achieve these anticipated benefits could result in a reduction in the price of our shares as well as in increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of management's time and energy and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
The carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets may be adversely affected.
When we complete an acquisition, goodwill and other intangible assets are often recorded on the date of acquisition as an asset. Current accounting guidance requires goodwill to be tested for impairment, and we perform such impairment analysis at least annually. A significant adverse change in expected future cash flows or sustained adverse change in the value of our common stock could require the asset to become impaired. If impaired, we would incur a charge to earnings that would have a significant impact on the results of operations. Our carrying value of goodwill and net amortizable intangibles were approximately $93 million and $36 thousand, respectively, as of December 31, 2025.
We rely on third-party vendors to provide key components of our business infrastructure, which could expose us to operational and financial risks.
Third-party vendors provide key components of our business operations such as data processing, recording and monitoring transactions, online banking interfaces and services, Internet connections and network access. We have selected these third-party vendors carefully and have conducted the due diligence consistent with regulatory guidance and best practices. While we have ongoing programs to review third-party vendors and assess risk, we do not control their actions. Any problems caused by these third parties, including those resulting from disruptions in communication services provided by a vendor, failure of a vendor to handle current or higher volumes, cyber-attacks and compromises at a vendor, failure of a vendor to provide services for any reason or poor performance of services, could adversely affect our ability to deliver products and services to our customers and otherwise conduct our business. Financial or operational difficulties of a third-
33
party vendor could also hurt our operations if those difficulties interfere with the vendor’s ability to serve us. Furthermore, our vendors could also be sources of operational and information security risk to us, including from breakdowns or failures of their own systems or capacity constraints. Replacing these third-party vendors could also create significant delay and expense. Accordingly, use of such third parties creates an unavoidable inherent risk to our business operations.
Industry adoption of real-time payments networks could negatively impact financial performance through reductions in product profitability, increased liquidity reserves and the potential for increased fraud losses, among other risks.
With the launch of real-time payments networks, such as RTP® from The Clearing House and FedNow® from the Federal Reserve, instantaneous cash settlement capabilities are available 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. The implications of the new settlement capabilities are far reaching and have not yet significantly affected the banking industry. As market adoption increases, we may be required to hold more liquidity reserves in cash to facilitate cash settlement activity outside of traditional business hours. Additionally, instantaneous settlement will likely reduce float benefits associated with providing deposit and banking services, as well as pose incremental fraud risk due to a reduced ability to reverse fraudulent transactions due to the speed of money movement.
We face significant cyber and data security risk that could result in the disclosure of or access to sensitive, confidential and/or nonpublic personal information, adversely affect our business or reputation and expose us to significant liabilities.
As a financial institution, we are under threat of loss due to cyber-attacks and technical disruptions to the computer systems and network infrastructure we use, including those we maintain with our service providers and vendors. This risk has increased in recent years, and continues to increase, as we continue to expand customer capabilities to utilize internet and other remote channels to transact business. Two of the most significant cyber-attack risks that we face are e-fraud and compromise of sensitive customer data. E-fraud occurs when cybercriminals compromise our systems and networks, or those of our service providers and vendors, and extract funds directly from customers or our accounts. The attempts to compromise sensitive, non-public personal customer data, such as account numbers and Social Security numbers, present potentially significant reputational, legal and/or regulatory costs to us. Our risk and exposure to these matters remain heightened because of the evolving nature and complexity of these threats from cybercriminals, our plans to continue to provide internet banking and mobile banking channels to initiate financial transactions, and our plans to develop additional remote connectivity solutions to serve our customers. While we have not experienced any material losses relating to cyber-attacks or other information security incidents, we have been subject to cyber-attacks and there can be no assurance that we will not suffer additional losses in the future.
We allow a portion of our employees to work remotely from their homes on a full-time or hybrid schedule. Technology in employees’ homes may not be as robust as in our offices and could cause the security of the networks, information systems, applications, and other tools available to employees to be more limited or less reliable than in our offices. The continuation of these work-from-home measures also introduces additional operational risk, including increased cybersecurity risks. These cybersecurity risks, and all those described above, include the potential for increased risk of (i) phishing, malware, and other cybersecurity attacks, (ii) vulnerability to disruptions of our information technology infrastructure and telecommunications systems for remote operations, (iii) unauthorized dissemination, access, misuse or destruction of sensitive or confidential information, (iv) our inability to restore the systems in the event of a systems failure or interruption, and (v) impairment of our ability to perform critical functions, including wiring funds, all of which could expose us to risks of data or financial loss, litigation and liability and could seriously disrupt our operations and the operations of any impacted customers.
The occurrence of any successful cyber-attack could result in material adverse consequences including damage to our reputation, financial loss, increased operation expenses, remediation costs, and loss of customers. We also could face litigation or additional regulatory scrutiny. Litigation or regulatory actions could lead to significant liability or other sanctions, including fines and penalties (which may not be covered by our insurance policies) or reimbursement of customers adversely affected by a security incident. Even if we do not suffer any material adverse consequences as a result of other future events, successful attacks or systems failures at the Bank or at other financial institutions could lead to a general loss of customer confidence in financial institutions, including the Bank.
34
Our ability to mitigate the adverse consequences of occurrences is in part dependent on the effectiveness of our information security procedures, controls, and contracts and our ability to anticipate the timing and nature of any such event that occurs. In recent years, we have incurred significant expense towards improving the reliability of our systems and their security from attacks. Nonetheless, there remains the risk that we may be materially harmed by cyber-attacks and information security incidents in the future. Methods used to attack information systems change frequently (with generally increasing sophistication), often are not recognized until launched against a target, may be supported by foreign governments, criminal organizations, or other financially motivated threat actors, and may originate from less regulated and remote areas around the world. As a result, we may be unable to prevent these methods in advance of attacks, including by implementing adequate preventive measures. If such an attack does occur, we might not be able to fix it timely or adequately. We engage in due diligence and monitoring of third parties, including service providers and vendors, to limit the risk that such an attack relates to products or services provided by others. In addition, as the regulatory environment related to information security, data collection and use, and privacy becomes increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, compliance with those requirements could also result in additional costs.
Financial services companies depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about customers and counterparties and inaccuracies in such information, including as a result of fraud, could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In deciding whether to extend credit or enter into other transactions with third parties, we rely on information furnished by or on behalf of customers and counterparties, including financial statements, credit reports and other financial information. We may also rely on representations of those customers, counterparties or other third parties, such as independent auditors or property appraisers, as to the accuracy and completeness of that information. Such information could be inaccurate, including as a result of fraud on behalf of our customers, counterparties or other third parties. In times of increased economic stress, we are at an increased risk of fraud losses. We cannot assure you that our underwriting and operational controls will prevent or detect such fraud or that we will not experience fraud losses or incur costs or other damage related to such fraud. Our customers may also experience fraud in their businesses, which could adversely affect their ability to repay their loans or make use of our services. Our exposure and the exposure of our customers to fraud may increase our financial risk and reputation risk as it may result in unexpected loan losses that exceed those that have been provided for in our allowance for loan losses. Reliance on inaccurate or misleading information from our customers, counterparties and other third parties, including as a result of fraud, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are dependent on key personnel and the loss of one or more of those key personnel could impair our relationship with our customers and adversely affect our business.
Many community banks attract customers based on the personal relationships that the banks’ officers and customers establish with each other and the confidence that the customers have in the officers. We significantly depend on the continued service and performance of our key management personnel. We also believe our management team’s depth and breadth of experience in the banking industry is integral to executing our business plan. The loss of the services of members of our senior management team or other key employees or the inability to attract additional qualified personnel as needed could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our compensation practices are subject to review and oversight by the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and other regulators. The federal banking agencies have issued and oversee compliance with joint guidance on executive compensation designed to help ensure that a banking organization’s incentive compensation policies do not encourage imprudent risk taking and are consistent with the safety and soundness of the organization. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act required these federal banking agencies, along with the SEC, to adopt rules to require reporting of incentive compensation and to prohibit certain compensation arrangements. In June 2023, the SEC approved the NASDAQ’s proposed clawback listing standards, which now require us and other NASDAQ-listed companies to (i) adopt and implement a compliant clawback policy; (ii) file the clawback policy as an exhibit to our annual reports; and (iii) provide certain disclosures relating to any compensation recovery triggered by the clawback policy. If, as a result of complying with these rules, we are unable to attract and retain qualified employees or do so at rates necessary to maintain our competitive position, or if the compensation costs required
35
to attract and retain employees become more significant, our performance, including our competitive position, could be materially adversely affected.
Deposit insurance premiums levied against us could increase.
The DIF is funded by fees assessed on insured depository institutions including the Bank. Future deposit premiums paid by us depend on FDIC rules, which are subject to change, the level of the DIF and the magnitude and cost of future bank failures. The FDIC may further increase the assessment rates or impose additional special assessments in the future, which may require the Bank to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums.
Liquidity Risks
Liquidity risk could impair our ability to fund operations and jeopardize our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Liquidity is essential to our business. Our ability to implement our business strategy will depend on our ability to obtain funding for loan originations, working capital, possible acquisitions and other general corporate purposes. An inability to raise funds through deposits, borrowings, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, the sale of loans and other sources could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. We anticipate that our retail and commercial deposits will be sufficient to meet our funding needs in the foreseeable future. We may rely on deposits obtained through intermediaries, FHLB advances, and other wholesale funding sources to obtain the funds necessary to implement our growth strategy.
Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities or on terms which are acceptable to us could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry or economy in general, including a decrease in the level of our business activity as a result of a downturn in the markets in which our loans are concentrated or adverse regulatory action against us. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a disruption in the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry. Access to liquidity may also be negatively impacted by the value of our securities portfolio, if liquidity and/or business strategy necessitate the sales of securities in a loss position. To the extent we are not successful in obtaining such funding, we will be unable to implement our strategy as planned which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Adverse developments affecting the financial services industry, such as actual events or concerns involving liquidity, defaults or non-performance by financial institutions or transactional counterparties, could adversely affect our current and projected business operations and its financial condition and results of operations.
Actual events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. If any parties with whom we conduct business are unable to access deposits with another financial institution, funds pursuant to such instruments or lending arrangements with such a financial institution, such parties’ credit quality, ability to pay their obligations to us, or to enter into new commercial arrangements requiring additional payments could be adversely affected. Uncertainty remains over liquidity concerns in the broader financial services industry. Additionally, confidence in the safety and soundness of regional banks specifically or the banking system could impact where customers choose to maintain deposits, which could materially adversely impact our liquidity, loan funding capacity, ability to raise funds, and results of operations. Similar impacts have occurred in the past, such as during the 2008-2010 financial crisis.
Although we assess our funding relationships as we believe necessary or appropriate, our access to funding sources and other arrangements in amounts adequate to finance or capitalize our current and projected future business operations could be significantly impaired by factors that affect us, our customers, the financial institutions with which we have arrangements directly, or the financial services industry or economy in general. These factors could include, among others, events such as liquidity constraints or failures, the ability to perform our obligations under various types of financial, credit or liquidity agreements or arrangements, disruptions or instability in the financial services industry or financial markets,
36
or concerns or negative expectations about the prospects for companies in the financial services industry. These factors could involve financial institutions or financial services industry companies with which we or our customers have financial or business relationships but could also include factors involving financial markets or the financial services industry generally.
Additionally, we could be impacted by current or future negative perceptions and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry which could worsen over time and result in downward pressure on, and continued or accelerated volatility of, bank securities.
We may also face increased regulatory scrutiny – in the course of routine examinations and otherwise – and new regulations directed towards banks of similar size to the Bank, which may increase our costs of doing business and reduce our profitability. Among other things, there may be an increased focus by both regulators and investors on deposit composition, the level of uninsured deposits, losses embedded in the held-to-maturity portion of our securities portfolio, contingent liquidity, CRE composition and concentration, capital position and our general oversight and internal control structures regarding the foregoing. As a commercial bank, the Bank has an elevated degree of uninsured deposits compared to larger national banks or smaller community banks with a stronger focus on retail deposits and also maintains a robust CRE portfolio. As a result, the Bank could face increased scrutiny or be viewed as higher risk by regulators and the investor community. In addition, bank failures have and could in the future prompt the FDIC to increase deposit insurance costs. Increases in funding, deposit insurance, or other costs as a result of these types of events have and could in the future materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Further, the disruption following these types of events has and could in the future generate significant market trading volatility among publicly traded bank holdings companies and, in particular, regional banks like us.
Capital Adequacy Risks
Future growth or operating results may require us to raise additional capital, but that capital may not be available, be available on unfavorable terms or may be dilutive.
Primis Bank is required by the FRB to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. In the event that our future operating results erode capital, if the Bank is required to maintain capital in excess of well-capitalized standards, or if we elect to expand through loan growth or acquisitions, we may be required to raise additional capital. Our ability to raise capital will depend on conditions in the capital markets, which are outside our control, and on our financial performance. Accordingly, we cannot be assured of our ability to raise capital on favorable terms when needed, or at all. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, we will be subject to increased regulatory supervision and the imposition of restrictions on our growth and business. These outcomes could negatively impact on our ability to operate or further expand our operations through acquisitions or the establishment of additional branches and may result in increases in operating expenses and reductions in revenues that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, in order to raise additional capital, we may need to issue shares of our common stock that would dilute the book value of our common stock and reduce our current shareholders’ percentage of ownership interest to the extent they do not participate in future offerings.
We may issue a new series of preferred stock or debt securities, which would be senior to our common stock and may cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
We have issued $27 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due January 31, 2027 and $60 million of fixed-to-floating rate Subordinated Notes due 2030. In the future, we may increase our capital resources by making additional offerings of debt or equity securities, which may include senior or additional subordinated notes, classes of preferred shares and/or common shares. Holders of our common stock are not entitled to preemptive rights or other protections against dilution. Preferred shares and debt, if issued, have a preference on liquidating distributions or a preference on dividend or interest payments that could limit our ability to make a distribution to the holders of our common stock. Future issuances and sales of parity preferred stock, or the perception that such issuances and sales could occur, may also cause prevailing market price for our common stock to decline and may adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital in the financial markets at times and prices favorable to us. Further issuances of our common stock could be dilutive to holders of our common stock.
37
We currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock; however, our future ability to pay dividends is subject to restrictions.
We declared the first cash dividend on our common stock in February 2012, and each quarter thereafter through 2025. There are a number of restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. It is the policy of the FRB that bank holding companies should pay cash dividends on common stock only out of income available over the past year and only if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s expected future needs and financial condition. The policy provides that bank holding companies should not maintain a level of cash dividends that undermines the bank holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries.
Our principal source of funds to pay dividends on our common stock is cash dividends that we receive from the Bank. The payment of dividends by the Bank to us is subject to certain restrictions imposed by federal banking laws, regulations and authorities. The federal banking statutes prohibit federally insured banks from making any capital distributions (including a dividend payment) if, after making the distribution, the institution would be "under capitalized" as defined by statute. In addition, the relevant federal regulatory agencies have authority to prohibit an insured bank from engaging in an unsafe or unsound practice, as determined by the agency, in conducting an activity. The payment of dividends could be deemed to constitute such an unsafe or unsound practice, depending on the financial condition of the Bank. Regulatory authorities could impose administratively stricter limitations on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to us if such limits were deemed appropriate to preserve certain capital adequacy requirements.
Regulatory Risks
We are heavily regulated by federal and state agencies; changes in laws and regulations or failures to comply with such laws and regulations may adversely affect our operations and our financial results.
We and the Bank are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by federal and state banking authorities. Any change in applicable regulations or federal or state legislation could have a substantial impact on us and the Bank, and our respective operations. Additional legislation and regulations may be enacted or adopted in the future that could significantly affect our powers, authority and operations or the powers, authority and operations of the Bank, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Further, bank regulatory authorities have the authority to bring enforcement actions against banks and their holding companies for unsafe or unsound practices in the conduct of their businesses or for violations of any law, rule or regulation, any condition imposed in writing by the appropriate bank regulatory agency or any written agreement with the agency. Possible enforcement actions against us could include the issuance of a cease-and-desist order that could be judicially enforced, the imposition of civil monetary penalties, the issuance of directives to increase capital or enter into a strategic transaction, whether by merger or otherwise, with a third party, the appointment of a conservator or receiver, the termination of insurance on deposits, the issuance of removal and prohibition orders against institution-affiliated parties, and the enforcement of such actions through injunctions or restraining orders. The exercise of this regulatory discretion and power may have a negative impact on us. See the discussion above at Supervision and Regulation for an additional discussion of the extensive regulation and supervision we are subject to.
As a regulated entity, Primis and the Bank must maintain certain required levels of regulatory capital that may limit our operations and potential growth.
As further described above under Supervision and Regulation—Capital Requirements, Primis and the Bank each are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the FRB.
Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional, discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s and our consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet commitments as calculated under these regulations.
38
As of December 31, 2025, Primis and the Bank exceeded the amounts required to be well capitalized with respect to all four required capital ratios. As of December 31, 2025, Primis’ leverage, CET1 risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital and Total risk-based capital ratios were 8.80%, 9.36%, 9.64%, and 12.40%, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, the Bank’s leverage, CET1 risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital and Total risk-based capital ratios were 9.74%, 10.74%, 10.74% and 11.99%, respectively.
Many factors affect the calculation of Primis and the Bank’s risk-based assets and its ability to maintain the level of capital required to achieve acceptable capital ratios. For example, changes in risk weightings of assets relative to capital and other factors may combine to increase the amount of risk-weighted assets in the Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and the Total risk-based capital ratio. Any increases in its risk-weighted assets will require a corresponding increase in its capital to maintain the applicable ratios. In addition, recognized loan losses in excess of amounts reserved for such losses, loan impairments, impairment losses on investment securities and other factors will decrease the Bank’s capital, thereby reducing the level of the applicable ratios.
Primis and the Bank’s failure to remain well capitalized for bank regulatory purposes could affect customer confidence, our ability to grow, our costs of funds and FDIC insurance costs, our ability to pay dividends on our capital stock, our ability to make acquisitions, and on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Under FRB rules, if the Bank ceases to be a well-capitalized institution for bank regulatory purposes, the interest rates that it pays on deposits and its ability to accept, renew or rollover brokered deposits may be restricted. As of December 31, 2025, we did not have any brokered certificates of deposits.
We are subject to commercial real estate lending guidance issued by the federal banking regulators that impacts our operations and capital requirements.
The federal banking regulators have issued final guidance regarding concentrations in commercial real estate lending directed at institutions that have particularly high concentrations of commercial real estate loans within their lending portfolios. This guidance suggests that institutions whose commercial real estate loans exceed certain percentages of capital should implement heightened risk management practices appropriate to their concentration risk and may be required to maintain higher capital ratios than institutions with lower concentrations in commercial real estate lending. Based on our commercial real estate concentration as of December 31, 2025, we believe that we are operating within the guidelines. However, increases in our commercial real estate lending could subject us to additional supervisory analysis. We cannot guarantee that any risk management practices we implement will be effective in preventing losses relating to our commercial real estate portfolio. Management has implemented controls to monitor our commercial real estate lending concentrations, but we cannot predict the extent to which this guidance will continue to impact our operations or capital requirements.
Changes in accounting standards or assumptions in applying accounting policies could adversely affect us.
Our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we record and report on our financial condition and results of operations. Some of these policies require use of estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported value of our assets or liabilities and results of operations and are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. If those assumptions, estimates or judgments were incorrectly made, we may be required to correct and restate prior-period financial statements. Accounting standard-setters and those who interpret the accounting standards, the SEC, banking regulators and our independent registered public accounting firm may also amend or even reverse their previous interpretations or positions on how various standards should be applied. These changes may be difficult to predict and could impact on how we prepare and report our financial statements. In some cases, we may be required to apply a new or revised standard retrospectively, resulting in us revising prior-period financial statements.
39
Financial Reporting Risks
Failure to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition and could impact the price of our common stock.
Failure to maintain an effective internal control environment could result in us not being able to accurately report our financial results, prevent or detect fraud, or provide timely and reliable financial information pursuant to our reporting obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Further, it could cause our investors to lose confidence in the financial information we report, which could affect the trading price of our common stock.
Management regularly reviews and updates our disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal control over financial reporting. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of our controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Primis Financial Corp. does not have any unresolved staff comments from the SEC to report for the year ended December 31, 2025.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
The Company has developed and maintains a Cyber and Information Security program that aligns with applicable regulatory guidance and industry best practices, and is intended to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the Company’s critical systems and information, including employee and customer non-public personal information, financial data, and non-public information about the Company. Cybersecurity risk is a key factor in assessing the Company’s overall operational and regulatory risk and is a component of the Company’s overall Enterprise Risk Management framework. The Cyber and Information Security program is designed, in part, to identify risks to sensitive information, protect that information, detect threats and events, and maintain an appropriate response and recovery capability to help ensure resilience against information security incidents.
The Company has designed the Cyber and Information Security program based in part on the NIST Cybersecurity Framework. Use of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework does not imply that the Company meets any particular technical standards, specifications, or requirements, but rather the NIST Cybersecurity Framework is used as a guide to help identify, assess, and manage cybersecurity risks relevant to the Company’s business.
The Cyber and Information Security program is led by the CIO and the designated Information Security Officer, who manages the day-to-day cybersecurity operations. Governance of the program is provided by the Information Technology Steering Committee and the Board of Directors’ Risk Committee. The CIO periodically attends Board Risk Committee meetings and provides quarterly cybersecurity updates to this Board committee. Our CIO helps facilitate the involvement of the Board Risk Committee in oversight of potentially material cybersecurity incidents and risks and supports the information security risk oversight responsibilities of the Board and the Board Risk Committee.
The Company’s IT team monitors its networks and systems to detect potential suspicious or malicious events, monitors threat intelligence sources to research evolving threats, investigates the potential impact to the Company, reviews controls to detect and defend against those threats, and proactively adjusts controls against those threats. A third-party managed security service provider supplements the IT team’s efforts to provide 24 hours a day, seven days a week network monitoring coverage. The Company also performs periodic vulnerability scans and penetration testing.
Other important components of the Company’s Cyber and Information Security program include maintaining a Cyber and Information Security Risk Assessment, and policies and procedures that define the program and establish standards for safe storage, handling, and secure disposal of customer and employee information. All employees receive cyber and information security training during employment orientation and at least annually thereafter.
The Company has adopted a Cyber Incident Response Plan which describes the Company’s procedures for responding to cybersecurity incidents and identifies response team members. The Cyber Incident Response team is responsible for evaluating potential incidents, containing, responding to, and remediating cybersecurity incidents, and communicating significant cybersecurity incidents to Executive Management and the Board of Directors. The Company maintains sufficient business continuity planning processes to ensure recovery and resumption of its operations after a cyberattack.
The Company has deployed a formal vendor management program to create standards when evaluating third-party service providers that may have access to the Company’s networks, systems, and/or customer or employee data. Third-party service providers are required to comply with the Company’s policies regarding the safeguarding of non-public personal information. After contract execution, the Company’s third-party service providers are monitored utilizing a risk-based evaluation process.
Our acting CIO has worked in the financial services industry for over 20 years and held similar roles at other financial institutions including five years as a Chief Technology Officer & Chief Innovation Officer at another bank.
While the Company has encountered, and will continue to encounter, cyber incidents in the normal course of business, to date, the Company has not experienced a cybersecurity incident that has, or is reasonably likely to have, materially impacted its business strategy, financial condition, or results of operation. Despite ongoing efforts to continually strengthen the Cyber and Information Security program, there is no absolute assurance that the program will be fully implemented, complied with, or effective in safeguarding the Company’s networks, systems, and information. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Operational Risks” in this 10-K for additional information.
Item 2. Properties
Primis Financial Corp.’s principal office is located at 1676 International Drive, McLean, Virginia. We have an administrative office in Glen Allen, Virginia and an operations center in Atlee, Virginia. Including these main locations, we own 4 properties and lease 47 properties. The majority of our properties owned and leased are for operational units in Virginia, Maryland, Texas, Tennessee and North Carolina. As of December 31, 2025, Primis Bank had twenty-four full-service branches in Virginia and Maryland, and also provided services to customers through certain online and mobile applications. Twenty-two full-service retail branches are in Virginia and two full-service retail branches are in Maryland.
During 2025, the Company executed a sale-leaseback transaction selling 18 of its retail branch properties that included land, land improvements and buildings and subsequently entering into a lease for the same properties. For additional details, see Note 1 - Organization and Significant Accounting Policies, in Part II, Item 8. of this 10-K.
We believe our facilities are in good operating condition, are suitable and adequate for our operational needs and are adequately insured.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Primis and Primis Bank are from time to time a party, as both plaintiff and defendant, to various claims and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business, including administrative and/or legal proceedings that may include employment-related claims, as well as claims of lender liability, breach of contract, and other similar lending-related claims. While the ultimate resolution of these matters cannot be determined at this time, the Company’s management presently believes that such matters, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There are no proceedings pending, or to management’s knowledge, threatened, that represent a significant risk against the Company as of December 31, 2025.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Common Stock Market Prices
Primis’ common stock is traded on the NASDAQ under the symbol “FRST”. There were 24,699,185 shares of our common stock outstanding at the close of business on February 27, 2026, which were held by 1,056 shareholders of record. As of that date, the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market was $13.21.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
As of December 31, 2025, Primis had outstanding stock options granted under the 2010 Stock Awards and Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) and the 2017 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2017 Plan”), which were approved by its shareholders. The following table provides information as of December 31, 2025 regarding Primis’ equity compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance:
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
Weighted average
equity compensation plans
to be issued upon exercise
exercise price of
(excluding securities reflected
of outstanding options
outstanding options
in column A)
Plan category
A
B
C
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
17,800
$
11.99
250,216
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
—
Total
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On December 18, 2025, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a stock repurchase program (the “Stock Repurchase Program”) under which the Company may repurchase up to 750,000 shares of its common stock. The Stock Repurchase Program began on December 18, 2025, near the end of the previously authorized repurchase plan, and will end on December 18, 2026.
Repurchases under the Stock Repurchase Program could be made from time to time through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or such other manners as will comply with applicable laws and regulations. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased depended on a variety of factors including price, corporate and regulatory requirements, market conditions and other corporate liquidity requirements and priorities.
The Stock Repurchase Program did not obligate the Company to purchase any particular number of shares and there was no guarantee as to the exact number of shares that could be repurchased by the Company. The Stock Repurchase Program could be suspended, modified or terminated by the Company at any time and for any reason, without prior notice.
The following table sets forth information regarding purchases of our common stock related to our share repurchase program made by us or on our behalf during the three months ended December 31, 2025:
Approximate
Total Number of
Dollar Value of
Shares
Shares that May
Purchased as
Yet be
Number of
Average
Part of Publicly
Purchased
Price Paid
Announced Plan
Under the Plan
Period
Per Share
or Program
or Program (1)
Oct 1-31, 2025
8,065,134
Nov 1-30, 2025
8,316,938
Dec 1-31, 2025
10,432,500
Dividends
We declared the first cash dividend on our common stock in February 2012, and each quarter thereafter through 2025. There are a number of restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. It is the policy of the FRB that bank holding companies should pay cash dividends on common stock only out of income available over the past year and only if prospective earnings retention is consistent with the organization’s expected future needs and financial condition. The policy provides that bank holding companies should not maintain a level of cash dividends that undermines the bank holding company’s ability to serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries. Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the Bank to Primis or by Primis to shareholders. The Company’s ability to pay dividends to stockholders is largely dependent upon the dividends it receives from the Bank, and the Bank is subject to regulatory limitations on the amount of cash dividends it may pay.
43
Performance Graph
The following chart compares the cumulative total shareholder return on Primis common stock during the five years ended December 31, 2025, with the cumulative total return of the Russell 2000 Index and the NASDAQ Bank Index for the same period. Dividend reinvestment has been assumed. This comparison assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2020 in Primis common stock, the Russell 2000 Index and the NASDAQ Bank Index. The historical stock price performance for Primis common stock shown on the graph below is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Primis Financial Corp.
100.00
127.63
103.56
115.52
110.11
136.41
Russell 2000 Index
114.82
91.35
106.82
119.14
134.40
NASDAQ Bank Index
142.91
119.65
115.54
139.30
149.15
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K generally discusses year-to-year comparisons between the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. Discussions of comparisons between 2024 and 2023 are not included in this Form 10-K, but can be found in “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 as filed with the SEC on April 29, 2025.
MD&A is presented to aid the reader in understanding and evaluating the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This discussion and analysis should be read with the consolidated financial statements, the footnotes thereto, and the other financial data included in this report.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES
We follow accounting and reporting policies that conform, in all material respects, to accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. and to general practices within the financial services industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. While we base estimates on historical experience, current information and other factors deemed to be relevant, actual results could differ from those estimates.
We consider accounting estimates to be critical to reported financial results if (i) the accounting estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain and (ii) different estimates that management reasonably could have used for the accounting estimate in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, could have a material impact on our financial statements.
Accounting policies related to the allowance for credit losses on financial instruments including loans and off-balance-sheet credit exposures are considered to be critical as these policies involve considerable subjective judgment and estimation by management. In the case of loans, the allowance for credit losses is a contra-asset valuation account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326, which is deducted from the amortized cost basis of loans to present the net amount expected to be collected.
In the case of off-balance-sheet credit exposures, the allowance for credit losses is a liability account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326. The allowance is reported as a component of other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Adjustments to the allowance are reported in our income statement as a component of noninterest expenses.
The amount of each allowance account represents management's best estimate of current expected credit losses on these financial instruments considering available information, from internal and external sources, relevant to assessing exposure to credit loss over the contractual term of the instrument. We use internal factors including loan balances, credit quality, contractual life of loans, and historical loss experience. While historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses, adjustments to historical loss information may be made for differences in current portfolio-specific risk characteristics, environmental conditions or other relevant factors. Management’s primary qualitative factors utilized in informing qualitative adjustments to the modeled allowance calculations are loan-to-value exceptions, borrower debt service coverage exceptions, and large concentrations. As of December 31, 2025, the qualitative adjustments applied by management increased our modeled allowance that was based on historical loss information, but did not represent a material amount of our total allowance.
We consider a number of external economic variables in developing the allowance including the Virginia Unemployment Rate, Virginia House Price Index, Virginia Gross Domestic Product and National Unemployment and National Gross Domestic Product for pools of loans with borrowers outside of our local operating footprint. One of the most significant and judgmental assumptions is the selection and application of expected economic forecasts. In determining forecasted expected losses, we use Moody’s economic variable forecasts and apply probability weights to the related economic scenarios. Due to the inherent uncertainty in the macroeconomic forecasts, we evaluate a baseline
scenario, as well as a downside macroeconomic scenario to assess the most reasonable scenario based on review of the variable forecasts for each scenario, comparison to expectations, and sensitivity of variations in each scenario. The Moody’s forecast scenarios are reviewed by management quarterly and probability weightings are assigned based on management’s judgment. As of December 31, 2025, management concluded on a more neutral weighting of baseline versus downside scenario. While management uses its judgment, there is no certainty that future economic conditions will resemble the neutral weighting applied to our modeling and others could examine the same data and arrive at a different judgment around weighting of the economic scenario that when applied to the model could result in a smaller or larger allowance than the one we determined.
Determining the appropriateness of the allowance is complex and requires judgment by management about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of our allowance accounts is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond our control, including the performance of our portfolios, the economy, changes in interest rates and the view of the regulatory authorities toward classification of assets. Further, subsequent evaluations of the then-existing loan portfolio, in light of factors existing at the time of subsequent evaluation may result in significant changes to the allowance.
Goodwill
As required under U.S. GAAP, we test goodwill for impairment at least annually and more frequently if there are indications that goodwill could be impaired. Our annual goodwill impairment testing date is September 30 and accordingly, we performed testing as of September 30, 2025 of our two reporting units that include goodwill. For our assessment of goodwill as of September 30, 2025, we performed a step one quantitative assessment to determine if the fair value of the Primis Bank and the Primis Mortgage reporting units were less than their carrying amount. As part of the testing, we engaged an independent valuation firm to quantitatively estimate the fair value of each reporting unit so that it could be compared to the carrying value in assisting us in determining if impairment existed.
Our assessment of the reporting units includes the use of three or four approaches, each receiving various weightings to determine an ultimate fair value estimate: (1) the comparable transactions method that is based on comparison to pricing ratios recently paid in the sale or merger of comparable institutions; (2) the control premium approach that is based on the Company’s trading price, adjusted for holding company assets and an industry based control premium; (3) the public market peers control premium approach that is based on market pricing ratios of similar public companies adjusted for an industry based control premium, and (4) a discounted cash flow method (an income method), taking into consideration expectations of our growth and profitability going forward. The assessment included use of various assumptions and inputs into the modeling approaches, including creating a baseline and conservative scenarios that stressed certain assumptions such as projected cash flows and the discount rate.
Fair value determinations require considerable judgment and are sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions and factors. As a result, there can be no assurance that the estimates and assumptions made for purposes of the goodwill impairment testing as of September 30, 2025 will prove to be an accurate prediction of the future. Changes in assumptions, market data (for market-based assessments), or the discount rate (for income based assessments) could produce different results that lead to higher or lower fair value determinations compared to the results of our annual impairment testing performed as of September 30, 2025. Further, because the use of inputs and assumptions are highly judgmental an analysis performed to assess the fair value of our reporting units by others may result in higher, lower, or the same fair value determination and goodwill impairment decision through the use of their judgment in application of similar inputs and assumptions as we used. As a result of our testing, we determined that the estimated fair value of both reporting units was higher than their respective carrying values. As of September 30, 2025, the estimated fair value of the Primis Bank and Primis Mortgage reporting units was 118% and 117%, respectively, of the carrying value of the reporting units, and no goodwill impairment was required. The Company performed a qualitative assessment to identify any triggering events as of December 31, 2025 and determined there were not any triggering events that would indicate that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of either reporting unit was less than its carrying value.
46
Third-party originated and serviced consumer loan portfolio
In the second half of 2021, we partnered with a TPOS to originate and service unsecured consumer loans through their proprietary point-of-sale technology (the “Consumer Program”). Loan options under the Consumer Program include traditional fully-amortizing loans and promotional loans with no interest, or “same-as-cash”, features if the loan is fully repaid in the promotional window. The loans are originated at par in the Bank’s name and have a term of 5 to 12 years with a much shorter effective life due to amortization and pay downs.
The Consumer Program is governed by multiple interrelated agreements including the loan agreement between the Bank and the customer and agreements with the TPOS. The structure of the Consumer Program is intended to generate loans that yield a targeted return to the Bank on a portfolio basis while also providing limited credit enhancement from the TPOS. Key characteristics of the combined arrangement include:
Under U.S. GAAP, agreements with multiple counterparties, such as the customer and TPOS, are generally required to be accounted for separately even if the agreements are highly interrelated. As a result, we account for the Consumer Program as multiple units of account with the following impacts:
47
In the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company made the decision to cease originating new loans under the Consumer Program, effective January 31, 2025 and moved a large portion of the portfolio, with an amortized cost of $133 million, to loans held for sale and marked them to the lower of cost or fair market value. The adjustment to fair market value resulted in additional provision expense and charge-offs of $20 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. The remaining portion of the portfolio of approximately $39 million remained classified as held for investment as of December 31, 2024. During the first quarter of 2025 the Company made the decision to retain until their maturity or payoff the loans previously transferred to held for sale. The loans were transferred back to held for investment at their then current amortized cost basis at the time of transfer, which included the previous fair market value adjustment as required by applicable accounting guidance.
We had $90 million and $152 million of loans outstanding in the Consumer Program, or 3% and 5% of our total gross loan portfolio, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, all of the Consumer Program loans were in loans held for investment. As of December 31, 2024, $113 million was included in loans held for sale at lower of cost or market and $39 million in the consumer loans category in loans held for investment. Loans in the Consumer Program that are held for investment are included within the Consumer Loan category disclosures in in this 10-K. As of December 31, 2025, 3% of the loans, or $3 million, were in a promotional period, with 80% of these promotional loan periods ending through the second quarter of 2026.
48
OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
Executive Overview
We organized the core bank and lines of business in a way that we believe will drive premium operating results. Our strategy centers on growing earning assets back to previous levels after the sale of our Life Premium Finance division in January 2025, growing non-interest deposits, and achieving higher production and profitability in our retail mortgage business. We continued to execute successfully during 2025 on our strategies, which included the following key highlights:
Core Community Bank
Panacea Financial Division of the Bank
Mortgage Warehouse
Primis Mortgage
Changes in the relationship with PFH during the first quarter of 2025 resulted in a determination to de-consolidate PFH as of March 31, 2025. The deconsolidation resulted in recognition of a $25 million gain during the year ended December 31, 2025, as a result of recording the fair value of our retained interest in common stock of PFH. As a result of the de-consolidation. we no longer include PFH’s financial results in our financial results after March 31, 2025. In June 2025, we sold a portion of our retained ownership in PFH common shares generating proceeds of $22 million and an additional gain during the year ended December 31, 2025 of $7 million. As of December 31, 2025, we continued to hold approximately 467 thousand shares in PFH recorded in our balance sheet at a fair value of $7 million. PFH continues to work with the Panacea Financial Division of the Bank to originate loans, some of which the Bank will retain, and others which will be sold to investors and other financial institutions.
49
SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL RESULTS
Results of Operations Highlights
We experienced significant improvement in financial performance during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Net income available to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2025 totaled $61 million, or $2.49 basic and diluted earnings per share, compared to a net loss of $16 million, or $0.66 loss per basic and per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2024, resulting in an increase year-over-year of $78 million, or 481%. The key financial drivers of the improvement are noted in the following table with additional discussions following the table ($ in thousands).
Year Ended
December 31, 2025
compared to
December 31, 2024
7,206
Provision for credit losses
38,332
Noninterest income
69,210
Noninterest expenses
(13,291)
Provision for income taxes
(18,951)
Noncontrolling interest
(4,858)
Net income attributable to Primis' common stockholders
77,648
50
Balance Sheet Highlights
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Income (Loss)
Net income available to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2025 totaled $61 million, or $2.49 basic and diluted earnings per share, compared to net loss of $16 million, or $0.66 loss per basic and per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2024. The results reflect an increase in noninterest income of $69 million, primarily due to a $51 million gain on a sale-leaseback transaction, $32 million in gains on our investment in PFH, and an increase of $8 million in mortgage banking income, partially offset by a $15 million loss on investment portfolio restructuring in the fourth quarter of 2025. We also had $38 million less provisions for credit losses primarily driven by improvement in the Consumer Program loan portfolio and a $7 million increase in our net interest income driven by lower interest expenses in the current year on deposits and borrowings. These increases were partially offset by an increase in noninterest expenses of $13 million driven primarily by higher personnel costs due to growth in PMC, Mortgage Warehouse, and the Panacea Division of the Bank and an increase in income tax provisions of $19 million from higher pre-tax earnings. Additional details of the changes in net income will be discussed in the remaining sections of this Results of Operations section.
51
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
Our operating results depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest and dividend income on interest-earning assets such as loans and investments, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings.
The following table details average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the amount of interest earned/paid on such assets and liabilities, and the yield/rate for the periods indicated:
Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Margin
Analysis For the Year Ended
Interest
Income/
Yield/
Balance
Expense
Rate
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
142,973
7,406
5.18
%
85,485
5,571
6.52
Loans, net of deferred fees (1) (2)
3,089,537
181,499
5.87
3,231,206
194,369
6.02
Investment securities
240,463
7,569
3.15
245,323
7,213
2.94
Other earning assets
100,591
3,968
3.94
82,757
3,816
4.61
Total earning assets
3,573,564
200,442
5.61
3,644,771
210,969
5.79
(43,872)
(50,530)
Total non-earning assets
289,253
293,074
Total assets
3,818,945
3,887,315
Liabilities and stockholders' equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW and other demand accounts
824,985
17,794
2.16
772,099
18,695
2.42
Money market accounts
760,971
20,534
2.70
829,331
26,923
3.25
Savings accounts
873,794
29,880
3.42
825,129
33,462
4.06
Time deposits
326,331
11,229
3.44
421,058
16,582
Total interest-bearing deposits
2,786,081
79,437
2.85
2,847,617
95,662
3.36
Borrowings
139,714
9,577
6.85
169,912
11,085
Total interest-bearing liabilities
2,925,795
89,014
3.04
3,017,529
106,747
3.54
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits
473,734
441,520
Other liabilities
40,681
36,422
Total liabilities
3,440,210
3,495,471
Primis common stockholders' equity
375,740
373,613
2,996
18,231
Total stockholders' equity
378,735
391,844
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
111,428
104,222
Interest rate spread
2.57
2.25
Net interest margin
3.12
2.86
52
Net interest income was $111 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $104 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Net interest income increased as a result of interest-bearing liability costs declining more than the decline in interest-earning asset income which was significantly impacted by the sale of the Life Premium Finance loan portfolio and income reversals on charged-off Consumer Program loans. Our net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2025 was 3.12%, compared to 2.86% for the year ended December 31, 2024. Margin increased by 26 basis points primarily from higher net interest income on lower average interest-earning assets over those periods.
53
The following table summarizes changes in net interest income attributable to changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities compared to changes in interest rates. The change in interest, due to both rate and volume, has been proportionately allocated between rate and volume.
December 31, 2025 vs. 2024
Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
Net
Volume
Change
(in thousands)
2,978
(1,143)
1,835
Loans, net of deferred fees
(8,392)
(4,478)
(12,870)
(167)
523
356
462
(310)
152
Total interest-earning assets
(5,119)
(5,408)
(10,527)
1,516
(2,417)
(901)
(2,096)
(4,293)
(6,389)
2,160
(5,742)
(3,582)
(3,429)
(1,924)
(5,353)
(1,849)
(14,376)
(16,225)
(2,110)
602
(1,508)
(3,959)
(13,774)
(17,733)
Change in net interest income
(1,160)
8,366
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses is a current charge to earnings made in order to adjust the allowance for credit losses for current expected losses in the loan portfolio based on an evaluation of the loan portfolio characteristics, current economic conditions, changes in the nature and volume of lending, historical loan experience and other known internal and external factors affecting loan collectability, and assessment of reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions that would impact collectability of the loans. Our allowance for credit losses is calculated by segmenting the loan portfolio by loan type and applying risk factors to each segment. The risk factors are determined by considering historical loss data, peer data, as well as applying management’s judgment.
For the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had provision for credit losses of $12 million and $51 million, respectively. Decline in provision for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to December 31, 2024 was driven by higher provisions in 2024 primarily related to the Consumer Program loans. We had elevated credit losses during 2024 concentrated in the promotional portion of the Consumer Program portfolio that were largely originated between the third quarter of 2022 and first quarter of 2023 that were exiting their promotional period and defaulting. Due to the majority of these promotional loans ending their promotions in 2024 or the first quarter of 2025, significant reserving in 2024 for these loans, and coupled with our enhanced loss mitigation efforts in 2025, our provisioning for this portfolio was only $1 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $40 million during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Excluding the provisioning on the Consumer Program portfolio, our provision for credit losses on the remaining loan portfolio was flat year over year. The Financial Condition section of this MD&A provides information on our loan portfolio, past due loans, nonperforming assets and the allowance for credit losses.
54
Noninterest Income
The following table presents the categories of noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
For the Year Ended
December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
Account maintenance and deposit service fees
5,664
5,784
(120)
Income from bank-owned life insurance
1,785
2,410
(625)
Gains on Panacea Financial Holdings investment
32,342
Mortgage banking income
32,387
23,919
8,468
Gains on sale of loans
1,929
303
1,626
Gain on sale-leaseback
50,573
Loss on sales of investment securities
(14,777)
Gains on other investments
159
408
(249)
Gain on sale of Life Premium Finance portfolio, net of broker fees
4,723
(4,723)
Consumer Program derivative income
1,340
4,320
(2,980)
Other noninterest income
948
1,273
(325)
Total noninterest income
112,350
43,140
Noninterest income increased 160% to $112 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to $43 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in noninterest income was primarily driven by a $51 million gain on the sale-leaseback transaction in the fourth quarter of 2025 and the $32 million gain on our PFH investment, which comprised the gain on deconsolidation of PFH in the first quarter of 2025 and gain on the sale of a portion of our retained ownership in PFH and fair value adjustments in 2025 to the remaining common share investment retained. The increase was also driven partially by $8 million of higher income from mortgage banking activity during 2025 compared to 2024. The increase in mortgage banking income was due to higher gain on sale income driven by $922 million in loan sales during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $706 million of sales in 2024, a 31% increase. We also had $2 million of additional income in 2025 compared to 2024 due to gains on sales of loans. The largest portion of the gain in 2025 was due to the sale of $54 million of Panacea Division loans to another financial institution resulting in over $1 million of gains.
The increases were partially offset by a $15 million loss on sale on investment securities in the fourth quarter of 2025 that resulted from our decision to restructure the portfolio by selling securities at lower yields and purchasing securities earning higher yields, declines in Consumer Program derivative income, a $5 million gain on sale of our LPF portfolio in 2024, and income from bank-owned life insurance as a result of several one-time death benefit gains in 2024 that did not re-occur in 2025.
The decline in Consumer Program related income was a combination of less income earned from the third-party on origination of loans, which ended in January of 2025, and less reimbursement due to us when borrowers paid off their promotional loans before the end of the promotional period. These two items resulted in a combined decline of $5 million in income when comparing the year ended December 31, 2025 to the same period in 2024. Partially offsetting this decline was $2 million in lower derivative fair value losses during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024. The decline was a result of the promotional loan population declining at a faster pace during the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2025 and also because the promotional loan balances were at a lower starting point at the beginning of 2025 compared to January 1, 2024. Noninterest income from the Consumer Program is expected
55
to be increasingly immaterial going forward as promotional loans have declined to only $3 million at the end of 2025 and we are no longer originating these loans.
Noninterest Expense
The following table present the major categories of noninterest expense for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
Salaries and benefits
79,059
66,615
12,444
Occupancy expenses
6,864
5,415
1,449
Furniture and equipment expenses
7,488
7,327
161
Amortization of core deposit intangible
1,265
(663)
Virginia franchise tax expense
2,307
2,525
(218)
FDIC insurance assessment
3,731
2,549
1,182
Data processing expense
10,676
10,564
112
Marketing expense
2,156
1,906
250
Telephone and communication expense
1,272
1,312
(40)
Professional fees
10,877
10,384
493
Fraud losses
232
2,039
(1,807)
Miscellaneous lending expenses
2,599
3,280
(681)
Other operating expenses
11,072
10,463
609
Total noninterest expenses
138,935
125,644
13,291
The higher salaries and benefits expense of $12 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 was driven primarily due to additions of several lending teams at PMC, one of which is the top mortgage originator in the Nashville, TN market and the other is the fourth ranked VA lender in the country. These teams drove the salaries and benefits expense increase in 2025 due to their salary draws while they rebuilt their portfolios. These teams are ultimately expected to generate production that will exceed these initial salary draws, which should help to generate income that offsets the salary expenses in later periods. Increase in salaries and benefits was also from the growth in salaries and benefit expenses in the Panacea Division and Mortgage Warehouse businesses, each increasing $1 million when comparing the year-to-date periods in 2025 to 2024. Increase in salaries and benefits for the year ended December 31, 2025 also included $3 million related to restricted stock compensation expenses in 2025 compared to $1 million in 2024. The $2 million increase is a result of strong financial performance in 2025 along with improved expectations of future performance resulting in a higher expectation of issued restricted stock eventually vesting.
Occupancy expenses increased $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily due to increase in lease expenses driven by several additional leases in 2025, increased annual rent on existing leases, and one month of lease expense related to the new master lease for the 18 branches sold and leased back in December in the sale lease-back transaction.
FDIC insurance expense increased $1 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 primarily due to an increase in our assessment base as a result of our financial restatements in 2024 and the changes in asset quality during 2025.
These expense increases were partially offset by TPOS vendor fraud in 2024 that did not reoccur, less core deposit intangible amortization that fully amortized by June 30, 2025, and lower miscellaneous lending expenses due to less loan collection costs and lower mortgage loan repurchase provisions in 2025 compared to 2024.
56
FINANCIAL CONDITION
The following illustrates key balance sheet categories as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
Total cash and cash equivalents
143,607
64,505
79,102
Securities available-for-sale
171,377
235,903
(64,526)
Securities held-to-maturity
6,981
9,448
(2,467)
Loans held for sale, at fair value
166,066
83,276
82,790
Loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
163,832
(163,832)
Net loans
3,237,800
2,833,723
404,077
Other assets
321,557
299,428
22,129
4,047,388
3,690,115
357,273
Total deposits
3,395,585
3,171,035
224,550
139,487
116,991
22,496
89,420
37,107
52,313
3,624,492
3,325,133
299,359
Total equity
422,896
364,982
57,914
Total liabilities and equity
LOAN PORTFOLIO
Loans Held for Sale
LHFS at fair value increased $81 million from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025 due to growth at PMC during the year and timing of origination and sale of loans at year end. LHFS at the lower of cost or market declined by $164 million primarily due to the sale of $51 million of LPF loans, paydowns of Consumer Program LHFS, and the transfer back to net loans of $102 million of Consumer Program loans in 2025 after the decision to retain these for the foreseeable future or until maturity.
Loans Held for Investment
Gross LHFI were $3.3 billion and $2.9 billion as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The increase in loans held for investment was driven by growth of mortgage warehouse loans and Panacea Division commercial loans, both of which were the primary driver of the $362 million increase in commercial loans seen below. LHFI also increased in 2025 due to the transfer back from LHFS of Consumer Program loans into the consumer loans category of LHFI, resulting in $51 million more Consumer Program loans in LHFI at December 31, 2025 compared to December 31, 2024. The growth was partially offset by the sale of $54 million of commercial loans in the Panacea Division and loan paydowns during the year ended December 31, 2025 of loans secured by real estate. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, over 50% of our loans were to customers located in Virginia and Maryland. We are not dependent on any single customer or group of customers whose insolvency would have a material adverse effect on our operations.
57
The composition of our loans HFI portfolio consisted of the following as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
Amount
Percent
Loans secured by real estate:
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
510,088
15.5
475,898
16.5
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
567,091
17.3
610,482
21.1
Secured by farmland
3,408
0.1
3,711
Construction and land development
131,757
4.0
101,243
3.5
Residential 1-4 family
576,866
17.5
588,859
20.4
Multi- family residential
140,261
4.3
158,426
5.4
Home equity lines of credit
61,738
1.9
62,954
2.2
Total real estate loans
1,991,209
60.6
2,001,573
69.2
Commercial loans
970,492
29.6
608,595
Paycheck protection program loans
1,719
1,927
Consumer loans
315,407
9.6
270,063
9.4
Total Non-PCD loans
3,278,827
99.9
2,882,158
99.8
PCD loans
4,856
5,289
0.2
Total loans
3,283,683
100.0
2,887,447
The following table sets forth the contractual maturity ranges of our LHFI portfolio and the amount of those loans with fixed and floating interest rates in each maturity range as of December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):
After 1 Year
After 5 Years
Through 5 Years
Through 15 Years
After 15 Years
One Year
Fixed
Floating
or Less
29,094
60,956
36,770
204,362
128,943
3,000
46,963
88,049
166,569
35,700
74,221
74,817
9,207
118,528
941
590
76
215
525
1,061
77,226
12,322
36,053
6,114
28,260
43,681
17,589
20,669
38,541
66,075
362,051
52,874
30,555
28,904
6,122
21,806
2,603
131
6,814
686
106
51,370
279,047
314,804
161,906
299,495
255,748
78,388
601,821
124,598
87,028
388,098
322,415
46,027
1,033
1,293
-
108,552
78,146
59,527
60,721
6,810
1,646
513,916
479,978
609,531
682,631
308,585
81,067
603,119
2,332
1,108
88
957
371
516,248
481,086
609,619
309,542
81,438
Our highest concentration of credit by loan type is in commercial real estate. As of December 31, 2025, 37% of our loan portfolio was comprised of loans secured by commercial real estate, including multi-family residential loans and loans secured by farmland. Commercial real estate loans are generally viewed as having a higher risk of default than residential real estate loans and depend on cash flows from the owner’s business or the property’s tenants to service the debt. The borrower’s cash flows may be affected significantly by general economic conditions, a downturn in the local economy, or in occupancy rates in the market where the property is located, any of which could increase the likelihood of default.
We seek to mitigate risks attributable to our most highly concentrated portfolios and our portfolios that pose unique risks to our balance sheet through our credit underwriting and monitoring processes, including oversight by a centralized
58
credit administration function, approval process, credit policy, and risk management committee, as well as through our seasoned bankers that focus on lending to borrowers with proven track records in markets with which we are familiar.
The following table presents the composition of the industry classification for commercial real estate non-owner occupied loans as a percentage of total loans for the periods ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
Hotel/ Motel
163,487
28.8
190,077
31.1
Office
131,638
23.2
136,046
22.3
Retail
80,918
14.3
97,748
16.0
Assisted living
54,382
58,191
9.5
Mixed use
44,626
7.9
49,419
8.1
Warehouse/ Industrial
20,691
3.6
21,454
Daycare/Schools/Churches
10,760
8,851
1.4
Self-storage
10,402
1.8
5,833
1.0
Leisure/Recreational
10,695
4,598
0.8
Other
39,492
7.0
38,265
6.3
Total Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
The following table presents the composition of office portfolio loans for commercial real estate non-owner occupied loans, their loan count and their weighted average loan-to-value percentage as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied - Office Portfolio (1)
Loan count
Weighted Average Loan-to-Value
Commercial medical office
9,303
66.7
7,020
66.9
Commercial office building
108,586
65.9
110,675
66.3
Commercial office/ warehouse
13,749
36.8
18,351
37.8
62.9
62.5
The shift to work-from-home and hybrid work environments has caused a decreased utilization of office space. As such, we have additional monitoring for our exposure to office space, within our non-owner occupied commercial real estate portfolio, including periodic credit risk assessment of expiring office leases for most of the office portfolio. We do not currently finance large, high-rise, or major metropolitan central business district office buildings, and the office portfolio is generally in suburban markets with good occupancy levels that have improved from last year.
Consumer Program Loans
The following table sets forth the contractual maturity ranges of our Consumer Program loan portfolio as of December 31, 2025, which is only originated at fixed rates ($ in thousands):
One Year or Less
After One Year to Five Years
After Five Through Ten Years
After Ten Years
Total Consumer Program Loans (1)
325
25,797
64,613
6,263
96,998
59
The following table describes the period over which our Consumer Program loans that are currently in a no interest promotional period will exit that promotional period and begin to amortize. All these promotional loans generally amortize over four years from the date they exit the promotional period if not prepaid before the end of the promotional period ($ in thousands):
Amount ending
No Interest
Total outstanding
Promotional Period in
Promotional
next 6 months
7-12 months
as of 12/31/25
2,240
566
2,806
During the year ended December 31, 2025, $36 million of Consumer Program loans either paid off during the no interest promotional period or converted to amortizing at the end of the promotional period. As of December 31, 2025, 94% of Consumer Program loans outstanding are current, 4% are past due 1-30 days, and the remaining 2% are past due greater than 30 days.
ASSET QUALITY
Nonperforming Assets
The following table presents a comparison of nonperforming assets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
Nonaccrual loans
84,823
15,026
Loans past due 90 days and accruing interest
1,713
Total nonperforming assets
86,536
16,739
SBA guaranteed amounts included in nonperforming loans
4,482
5,921
Allowance for credit losses to total loans
1.40
1.86
Allowance for credit losses to nonaccrual loans
54.09
357.53
Allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans
53.02
320.94
Nonaccrual to total loans
2.59
0.52
Nonperforming assets excluding SBA guaranteed loans to total assets
2.03
0.29
Nonperforming assets increased $70 million, or 417%, as of December 31, 2025 compared to December 31, 2024, which was driven by an increase in nonaccrual loans. The increase in nonaccrual was primarily due to the addition of one commercial real estate loan with a $40 million amortized cost balance that was past due 60- 90 days as of December 31, 2025 and one commercial relationship comprised of two loans totaling $24 million in amortized cost that was nonaccruing, but not past due as of December 31, 2025.
The commercial real estate loan is delinquent due to turnover in tenant occupancy on the underlying office asset leading to reduced lease income. Leasing activity has become more stabilized in the DC market, and the asset is seeing strong interest in new lease negotiations. We have a lien on the underlying collateral which is Class A office space in a desirable location in northern Virginia. The borrower is actively seeking new tenants for vacant office space in the building. We assess expected credit losses on this loan individually and have a $7 million individual reserve against the loan, or 18% of its amortized cost balance, as of December 31, 2025.
The commercial loans were placed on nonaccrual early in the third quarter of 2025. The loans were utilized originally by the customer to support a business acquisition into an existing business. Stabilization of operations had a longer trajectory than originally forecast. The company became profitable at the end of 2024 and has shown steady improvement during 2025. We have subsequently entered into a forbearance agreement with the borrower who is satisfactorily performing under the terms of agreement as of December 31, 2025. We assess expected credit losses on this loan
60
individually and obtained a third-party valuation of the business in 2025 to assist in determining the $5 million individual reserve against the loan, or 20% of its amortized cost balance, as of December 31, 2025.
We identify potential problem loans based on loan portfolio credit quality. We define our potential problem loans as internally rated as substandard or worse, less total nonperforming assets noted above. As of December 31, 2025, our potential problem loans totaled $60 million.
We will generally place a loan on nonaccrual status when it becomes 90 days past due, with the exception of most consumer loans, which are charged off at 120 days past due and Consumer Program loans, which are charged off once they reach 90 days past due. Loans will also be placed on nonaccrual status in cases where we are uncertain whether the borrower can satisfy the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Cash payments received while a loan is categorized as nonaccrual will be recorded as a reduction of principal as long as doubt exists as to future collections.
We maintain appraisals on loans secured by real estate, particularly those categorized as nonperforming loans and potential problem loans. In instances where appraisals reflect reduced collateral values, we make an evaluation of the borrower’s overall financial condition to determine the need, if any, for impairment or write-down to their fair values. If foreclosure occurs, we record OREO at the lower of our recorded investment in the loan or fair value less our estimated costs to sell.
Our loan portfolio losses and delinquencies have been primarily limited by our underwriting standards and portfolio management practices. Whether losses and delinquencies in our portfolio will increase significantly depends upon the value of real estate securing the loans and economic factors, such as the overall economy, rising or elevated interest rates, historically high or persistent inflation, and recessionary concerns.
Loan Review
We rely on a combination of first and second line of defense processes to measure the overall quality of our loan portfolio. From a first line perspective, each loan is assigned a risk rating ranging from one to nine, with loans closer to a rating of one having less risk. This risk rating scale is our primary credit quality indicator that is reviewed periodically by management, while delinquency status is a secondary risk indicator we also monitor. From a second line of defense perspective, we have a loan review function independent of credit administration that reports to the Company’s CRO and performs a risk-based review of a sample of commercial loans and loan relationships to evaluate credit quality and adherence to underwriting standards.
Allowance for Credit Losses
We are focused on the asset quality of our loan portfolio, both before and after a loan is made. We have established underwriting standards that we believe are effective in maintaining high credit quality in our loan portfolio. We have experienced loan officers who take personal responsibility for the loans they originate, a skilled underwriting team and highly qualified credit officers that review each loan application carefully.
Our allowance for credit losses is established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for credit losses. Management evaluates the allowance at least quarterly. In addition, on a quarterly basis, our Board of Directors reviews our loan portfolio, evaluates credit quality, reviews the loan loss provision and the allowance for credit losses and requests management to make changes as may be required. In evaluating the allowance, management and the Board of Directors consider the growth, composition and industry diversification of the loan portfolio, historical loan loss experience, current delinquency levels and all other known factors affecting loan collectability.
The allowance for credit losses is based on the CECL methodology and represents management’s estimate of an amount appropriate to provide for expected credit losses in the loan portfolio. This estimate is based on historical credit loss information adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts applied to various loan types that compose our portfolio, including the effects of known factors such as the economic environment within our market area will have on net losses. The allowance is also subject to regulatory examinations and determination by the regulatory agencies as to the appropriate level of the allowance.
61
The following table sets forth the allowance for credit losses allocated by loan category and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans at the dates indicated ($ in thousands):
As of December 31,
Percent of
Allowance
Loans by
for Credit
Category to
Losses
Total Loans
5,682
5,899
15,329
6,966
748
1,203
6,852
6,819
1,368
1,620
428
533
11,197
10,794
Paycheck Protection Program loans
4,249
19,625
245
45,883
53,724
The following table presents an analysis of the allowance for credit losses for the periods indicated ($ in thousands):
For the Year Ended December 31,
Balance, beginning of period
52,209
Provision charged to operations:
Total provisions
12,289
50,621
Recoveries credited to allowance:
14,198
1,873
Total recoveries
14,203
80,216
104,759
Loans charged off:
72
935
926
33,326
50,092
Total loans charged-off
34,333
51,035
Net charge-offs
20,130
49,106
Balance, end of period
Net charge-offs to average loans, net of unearned income
0.65
1.48
We believe that the allowance for credit losses as of December 31, 2025 is sufficient to absorb future expected credit losses in our loan portfolio based on our assessment of all known factors affecting the collectability of our loan portfolio. Our assessment involves uncertainty and judgment; therefore, the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses cannot be determined with precision and may be subject to change in future periods. In addition, bank regulatory authorities, as part of their periodic examination, may require additional charges to the provision for credit losses in future periods if the results of their reviews warrant additions to the allowance for credit losses.
62
Our allowance for credit losses was $46 million as of December 31, 2025, compared to $54 million as of December 31, 2024. The $8 million decrease was driven by $29 million in net charge-offs during the year ended December 31, 2025, primarily a result of Consumer Program loans, and less provision for credit losses. Our provision for credit losses decreased $38 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the same periods in 2024, primarily related to improved performance in the Consumer Program portfolio as a result of the significant decline in promotional loans that drove prior credit losses and a changing mix of the Bank’s loan portfolio to loan categories with lower reserve requirements. Partially offsetting these declines were specific provisions for expected credit losses of $7 million on the individually evaluated commercial real estate loan that was 60 - 90 days past due and proactively placed on nonaccrual during the year ended December 31, 2025. Additional discussion of the change in the provision for credit losses is included in this MD&A in the “Provision for Credit Losses” section.
Net charge-offs were primarily related to the Consumer Program portfolio during the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we charged off $18 million, net of recoveries, in the Consumer Program portfolio. Comparatively, during the year ended December 31, 2024, we charged off $46 million, net of recoveries. The majority of these charge-offs related to loans originated from the third quarter of 2022 through the first quarter of 2023 where we experienced significant credit weaknesses. Included in Consumer Program net charge-offs during 2025 were $13 million of recoveries related to charge-offs taken as of December 31, 2024 to record the loans at the lower of cost or market when we made the decision to move a substantial portion of the loans to HFS. As previously discussed, we subsequently decided to retain the loans and they were moved back into LHFI at their then amortized cost balance inclusive of the prior charge-offs. When excluding the Consumer Program net charge-offs, we had net charge-offs of $2 million and $3 million during the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, on the remainder of our LHFI portfolio.
We have experienced a majority of our losses in the Consumer Program on promotional loans originated in the third quarter of 2022 through the first quarter of 2023. Our allowance methodology for the Consumer Program was updated during the year ended December 31, 2024 to consider promotional loan maturity, especially around these earlier vintages, and amount of first payment defaults with eventual charge-off, which was a key driver to the heightened overall charge-offs in 2024. Almost all of these earlier vintages have since ended their promotional period and began to amortize prior to December 31, 2025. As a result, we believe that any remaining loans in these older vintages, along with newer vintage promotional loans that end their promotional period over the next four quarters have been considered in our reserving methodology based on our loss experience from 2024 to the first quarter of 2025 with the earlier vintage promotional loans. Additionally, we have also implemented enhanced loss mitigation efforts that include working with promotional loan borrowers both prior to the end of the promotional period and once a borrower defaults in order to maximize collectability. A combination of these factors, along with the remaining balance of promotional loans of only $3 million, resulted in our lower provisioning for the year ended December 31, 2025 and lower ending allowance balance at December 31, 2025.
As of December 31, 2025, the principal balance outstanding of Consumer Program loans was $97 million, excluding a $7 million discount as a result of our prior decision to market a majority of the portfolio for sale, which has since been moved back to LHFI and will be run-off over time. These loans are accounted for like our other consumer loans and are not placed on nonaccrual because they are charged off when they become 90 days past due. The allowance on this portfolio plus the discount amounts to $8 million as of December 31, 2025. As of December 31, 2025, 94% of the outstanding principal balance was current, resulting in 148% coverage by the aggregate allowance and discount of the non-current principal balances.
63
INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Our investment securities portfolio provides us with required liquidity and collateral to pledge to secure public deposits, certain other deposits, advances from the FHLB, and repurchase agreements.
Our investment securities portfolio is managed by our CFO, who has significant experience in this area, with the concurrence of our ALCO. In addition to our CFO (who is the chairman of the ALCO) this committee is comprised of outside directors and other senior officers of the Bank, including but not limited to our CEO and Treasurer. Investment management is performed in accordance with our investment policy, which is approved annually by the Board of Directors. Our investment policy authorizes us to invest in:
MBS are securities that have been developed by pooling a number of real estate mortgages and which are principally issued by agency/ GSEs such as the GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC. These securities are deemed to have high credit ratings, and minimum regular monthly cash flows of principal and interest are guaranteed by the issuing agencies.
CMOs are bonds that are backed by pools of mortgages. The pools can be GNMA, FNMA or FHLMC pools or they can be private-label pools. The CMOs are designed so that the mortgage collateral will generate a cash flow sufficient to provide for the timely repayment of the bonds. The mortgage collateral pool can be structured to accommodate various desired bond repayment schedules, provided that the collateral cash flow is adequate to meet scheduled bond payments. This is accomplished by dividing the bonds into classes to which payments on the underlying mortgage pools are allocated. The bond’s cash flow, for example, can be dedicated to one class of bondholders at a time, thereby increasing call protection to bondholders. In private-label CMOs, losses on underlying mortgages are directed to the most junior of all classes and then to the classes above in order of increasing seniority, which means that the senior classes have enough credit protection to be given the highest credit rating by the rating agencies.
Obligations of states and political subdivisions (municipal securities) are purchased with consideration of the current tax position of the Bank. Both taxable and tax-exempt municipal bonds may be purchased, but only after careful assessment of the market risk of the security. Appropriate credit evaluation must be performed prior to purchasing municipal bonds.
Corporate bonds consist of senior and/or subordinated notes issued by banks. Bank subordinated debt, if rated, must be of investment grade and non-rated bonds are permissible if the credit-worthiness of the issuer has been properly analyzed.
CLOs are actively managed securitization vehicles formed for the purpose of acquiring and managing a diversified portfolio of senior secured corporate bank loans, otherwise known as “broadly syndicated loans”. The loan portfolio is transferred to bankruptcy-remote special-purpose vehicle, which finances the acquisition through the issuance of various classes of debt and equity securities with varying levels of senior claim on the underlying loan portfolio. CLOs must be rated AA or better at the time of purchase.
AFS and HTM investment securities totaled $178 million as of December 31, 2025, a decrease of 27% from $245 million as of December 31, 2024, primarily due to sale of $144 million in book value of investment securities during 2025, improvement in unrealized losses on AFS securities and paydowns, maturities, and calls of the AFS and HTM investments over the past year, partially offset by purchases of AFS securities during that time. We recognized no credit impairment
64
charges related to credit losses on our HTM investment securities during the year ended December 31, 2025. We decided to sell the $144 million of investment securities in 2025 as an opportunity to restructure the portfolio into better yielding investments over the long-term, taking advantage also of gains during the year in the sale-leaseback and PFH transactions to offset the $15 million of realized losses upon sale of the securities. The average coupon of the aggregate investments sold was 2.98% and we partially replaced the $144 million of sold investments with $75 million of par value AFS securities with an average coupon of 4.22%.
The following table sets forth a summary of the investment securities portfolio as of the dates indicated. AFS investment securities are reported at fair value, and HTM investment securities are reported at amortized cost ($ in thousands).
Available-for-sale investment securities:
Residential government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
71,806
91,407
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
5,778
29,705
Corporate securities
6,579
15,080
Residential government-sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations
63,807
56,390
Government-sponsored agency securities
13,836
Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities
16,965
22,178
SBA pool securities
6,442
7,307
Held-to-maturity investment securities:
5,462
7,760
1,519
169
Debt investment securities that we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as HTM and are carried at amortized cost. Investment securities classified as AFS are those debt securities that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, liquidity needs or other similar factors. Investment securities AFS are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses net of deferred taxes, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity.
For additional information regarding investment securities refer to “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 2 - Investment Securities” in this Form 10-K.
65
The following table sets forth the amortized cost, fair value, and weighted average yield of our investment securities by contractual maturity as of December 31, 2025. Weighted average yield is calculated as the tax-equivalent yield on a pro rata basis for each security based on its relative amortized cost. Yields on tax-exempt securities have been computed on a tax-equivalent basis. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties ($ in thousands).
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Weighted
Amortized
Cost
Fair Value
Yield
Due less than one year
795
791
Due after one year through five years
1,355
1,358
5.15
Due after five years through ten years
2,965
2,562
2.38
Due after ten years
1,205
1,067
3.60
6,320
3.16
5,000
4,786
8.05
2,000
1,793
4.50
7,000
7.03
2,975
3,002
4.55
7,083
6,597
2.93
62,120
62,207
4.47
72,178
4.33
11,999
12,268
5.31
51,217
51,539
4.96
63,216
5.03
619
618
1.53
1,637
1,434
0.97
10,584
9,341
6,173
5,572
1.47
19,013
1.46
517
512
4.87
4,090
4,048
4.24
1,892
1,882
6.20
6,499
174,226
4.36
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity
1,014
993
505
500
1,493
2.63
2,002
1,911
2.45
3,460
3,156
2.49
5,067
2.48
6,560
2.51
For additional information regarding investment securities refer to “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 2 - Investment Securities.”
DEPOSITS AND OTHER BORROWINGS
Deposits
The market for deposits is competitive. We offer a line of traditional deposit products that currently include noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing checking (or NOW accounts), commercial checking, money market accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. We use deposits as a principal source of funding for our lending, purchasing of investment securities and for other business purposes. We seek to fund increased loan volumes by growing core deposits,
66
but, subject to internal policy limits on the amount of funding we may maintain, we may use funding sources to fund shortfalls, if any, or to provide additional liquidity. We use purchased brokered deposits as part of our overall liquidity management strategy on an as needed basis, and we purchase such brokered deposits through nationally recognized networks.
We compete for deposits through our banking branches with competitive pricing coupled with personalized service, as well as nationally through advertising and our online digital banking platform. We leverage technology as a differentiator in the marketplace, including with our V1BE fulfillment offering. V1BE is an app-based delivery service that allows customers to order a variety of banking services that would normally require an in-person visit to a branch. The service is particularly popular with small business customers that generally have fewer employees and are more sensitive to the amount of time consumed by dispatching an employee to a branch on a regular basis. As of December 31, 2025, more than $200 million of deposits were supported by V1BE with approximately $30 million of checking accounts associated with customers that use the service every week.
Total deposits increased by $224 million, or 7%, to $3.4 billion as of December 31, 2025 from $3.2 billion at December 31, 2024. The mix of deposits changed during the year ending December 31, 2025, including an increase in lower-cost demand, NOW deposit balances and savings balances of $306 million, offset by a decline in money market and time deposit account balances of $82 million. The driver of the increase in 2025 was due to the growth of noninterest bearing and lower cost interest bearing deposit accounts generated by our local banking footprint as well as our Panacea and Mortgage Warehouse divisions that have focused on this deposit growth to cost-effectively fund their loan growth. We had no wholesale deposit funding at December 31, 2025 or 2024.
Approximately $1.0 billion of our total deposits at both December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 are from our digital banking platform with a substantial portion of these deposits from customers outside of our local branch footprint. Deposits were flat year-over-year on this platform as we managed rates paid on these deposits during the Federal Reserve’s rate cutting cycle in the latter half of 2025. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 83% of the customers on the digital platform have been with us for at least two years.
Our deposits are diversified in type and by underlying customers and lack significant concentration in any type of customer (i.e. commercial, consumer, government) or industry. Deposits are net of excess amounts we sweep off balance sheet to manage liquidity. Deposits swept off our balance sheet were $137 million as of December 31, 2024, compared to none as of December 31, 2025.
Uninsured deposits are defined as the portion of deposit accounts in U.S. offices that exceed the FDIC insurance limit and amounts in any other uninsured investment or deposit accounts that are classified as deposits and are not subject to any federal or state deposit insurance regimes. Total uninsured deposits as calculated per regulatory guidance were $943 million, or 28% of total deposits at the Bank, as of December 31, 2025.
The following table sets forth the average balance and average rate paid on each of the deposit categories for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
Interest-bearing deposits:
3,259,815
3,289,137
The variety of deposit accounts we offer allows us to be competitive in obtaining funds and in responding to the threat of disintermediation (the flow of funds away from depository institutions such as banking institutions into direct
67
investment vehicles such as government and corporate securities). Our ability to attract and maintain deposits, and the effect of such retention on our cost of funds, has been, and will continue to be significantly affected by the general economy and market rates of interest.
The following table sets forth the maturities of certificates of deposit of $100 thousand and over as of December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):
Within
3 to 6
6 to 12
Over 12
3 Months
Months
73,482
58,421
67,078
21,230
220,211
Other Borrowings
Other borrowings can consist of FHLB borrowings, federal funds purchased, secured borrowings due to failed loan sales, and repo transactions that mature within one year, which are secured transactions with customers. Other borrowings consist of the following as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
Total FHLB advances
25,000
Secured borrowings
14,773
17,195
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
3,552
3,918
43,325
21,113
Weighted average interest rate on FHLB advances at year end
4.94
For the years ended December 31,
Average outstanding balance
43,522
54,492
Average interest rate during the year
4.98
5.37
Maximum month-end outstanding balance
184,760
168,677
We borrow funds on a short-term basis to support our liquidity needs and to temporarily satisfy our funding needs from increased loan demand and for other shorter-term purposes. We are a member of the FHLB and are authorized to obtain advances from the FHLB from time to time, as needed. The FHLB has a credit program for members with different maturities and interest rates, which may be fixed or variable. We are required to collateralize our borrowings from FHLB with purchases of FHLB stock and other collateral acceptable to the FHLB. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had $25 million and no FHLB borrowings, respectively. The FHLB borrowings at December 31, 2025 are short-term borrowings that were obtained in October 2025 primarily to fund increased loan growth and were repaid in the first quarter of 2026. As of December 31, 2025, we had $319 million unused and available FHLB lines of credit as well as $484 million of available credit with the FRB, secured by excess collateral pledged to the FHLB and FRB in the form of loans and investment securities.
We had secured borrowings of $15 million and $17 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The Company transferred zero and $1 million in principal balance of loans to another financial institution in 2025 and 2024, respectively, that were treated as secured borrowings. These borrowings reflect the cash received for transferring the loans to the other financial institution and any unamortized sale premium and are secured by approximately the same amount of loans held for investment that are recorded in our balance sheet. We retained the servicing of the loans that were transferred and accordingly receive principal and interest from the borrower as contractually required and transfer the interest to the other financial institution net of our contractually agreed upon servicing fee. The loans transferred have an average maturity of approximately ten years, which will be the time over which the principal balance of the loans in our balance sheet and secured borrowings will pay down, absent borrower prepayments. For additional information on secured borrowings refer to “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 10 –Securities Sold Under Agreements To Repurchase And Other Borrowings” in this Form 10-K.
68
JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT AND SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES
For information about junior subordinated debt and senior subordinated notes and their anticipated principal repayments refer to “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 11 – Junior Subordinated Debt and Senior Subordinated Notes.”
INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY AND MARKET RISK
We are engaged primarily in the business of investing funds obtained from deposits and borrowings into interest-earning loans and investments. Consequently, our earnings significantly depend on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income on loans and other investments and the interest expense on deposits and borrowings. To the extent that our interest-bearing liabilities do not reprice or mature at the same time as our interest-earning assets, we are subject to interest rate risk and corresponding fluctuations in net interest income. Our ALCO meets regularly and is responsible for reviewing our interest rate sensitivity position and establishing policies to monitor and limit exposure to interest rate risk. The policies established by the ALCO are reviewed and approved by our Board of Directors. We have employed asset/liability management policies that seek to manage our net interest income, without having to incur unacceptable levels of credit or investment risk.
We use simulation modeling to manage our interest rate risk and review quarterly interest sensitivity. This approach uses a model which generates estimates of the change in our EVE over a range of interest rate scenarios. EVE is the present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts using assumptions including estimated loan prepayment rates, reinvestment rates and deposit decay rates.
The following tables are based on an analysis of our interest rate risk as measured by the estimated change in EVE resulting from instantaneous and sustained parallel shifts in the yield curve (plus 400 basis points or minus 400 basis points, measured in 100 basis point increments) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. All changes are within our Asset/Liability Risk Management Policy guidelines ($ in thousands).
Sensitivity of EVE
As of December 31, 2025
EVE as a % of
Change in Interest Rates
$ Change
% Change
Equity
in Basis Points (Rate Shock)
From Base
Book Value
Up 400
580,061
(92,337)
(13.73)
14.33
137.16
Up 300
609,258
(63,140)
(9.39)
15.05
144.07
Up 200
635,000
(37,398)
(5.56)
15.69
150.16
Up 100
665,294
(7,104)
(1.06)
16.44
157.32
Base
672,398
16.61
159.00
Down 100
664,487
(7,911)
(1.18)
16.42
157.13
Down 200
636,039
(36,359)
(5.41)
15.71
150.40
Down 300
589,701
(82,697)
(12.30)
14.57
139.44
Down 400
496,404
(175,994)
(26.17)
12.26
117.38
As of December 31, 2024
438,490
(68,444)
(13.50)
11.88
120.14
451,722
(55,212)
(10.89)
12.24
123.77
464,410
(42,524)
(8.39)
12.59
127.24
493,213
(13,721)
(2.71)
13.37
135.13
506,934
13.74
138.89
509,055
2,121
0.42
13.80
139.47
493,913
(13,021)
(2.57)
13.38
135.33
469,048
(37,886)
(7.47)
12.71
128.51
435,781
(71,153)
(14.04)
11.81
119.40
69
Our interest rate sensitivity is also monitored by management through the use of a model that generates estimates of the change in the NII over a range of interest rate scenarios. NII depends upon the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned or paid on them. In this regard, our model historically assumes that the composition of our interest sensitive assets and liabilities remains constant over the period being measured and also assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration to maturity or repricing of specific assets and liabilities.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we implemented enhancements to our interest rate risk modeling framework, which impacted the NII sensitivity modeling results as of December 31, 2025 seen below. The enhancements include the adoption of non-linear beta and decay assumptions, which reflect industry best practices for modeling deposit behaviors and rate sensitivities. As a result of these changes, the Bank’s overall interest rate risk profile shifted toward a more neutral position. Additionally, the Bank has also steadily increased its portfolio of floating-rate mortgage warehouse loans during the year ended December 31, 2025, which when combined with the modeling enhancements increased our asset sensitivity compared to year end as seen in each of the shock scenarios as of December 31, 2025. The results below are within our ALM Policy guidelines as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands).
Sensitivity of NII
Adjusted NII
138,460
12,036
135,719
9,295
132,912
6,488
130,888
4,464
126,424
122,521
(3,903)
117,838
(8,586)
113,697
(12,727)
109,356
(17,068)
95,367
(15,874)
98,941
(12,300)
102,472
(8,769)
107,370
(3,871)
111,241
114,126
2,885
114,960
3,719
115,205
3,964
115,736
4,495
Sensitivity of EVE and NII are modeled using different assumptions and approaches. Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodology used in the above interest rate risk measurements. Modeling changes in EVE and NII sensitivity requires the making of certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, although the EVE tables and NII tables provide an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to, and do not, provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on our net worth and NII.
70
LIQUIDITY AND FUNDS MANAGEMENT
The objective of our liquidity management is to ensure the ability to meet our financial obligations. These obligations include the payment of deposits on demand or at maturity, the repayment of borrowings at maturity and the ability to fund commitments and other new business opportunities. We obtain funding from a variety of sources, including customer deposit accounts, customer certificates of deposit and payments on our loans and investments. If our level of core deposits is not sufficient to fully fund our lending activities, we have access to funding from additional sources, including but not limited to, borrowing from the FHLB and institutional certificates of deposits. In addition, we maintain federal funds lines of credit with two correspondent banks, totaling $75 million, and utilize securities sold under agreements to repurchase and reverse repurchase agreement borrowings from approved securities dealers as needed. For additional information about borrowings and anticipated principal repayments refer to the discussion previously in “Deposits and Other Borrowings” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 10 – Securities Sold Under Agreements To Repurchase And Other Borrowings, Note 11 – Junior Subordinated Debt and Senior Subordinated Notes, and Note 15 – Financial Instruments With Off-Balance-Sheet Risk.”
We prepare a cash flow forecast on a 30, 60 and 90 day basis along with a one and two year basis. These projections incorporate expected cash flows on loans, investment securities, and deposits based on data used to prepare our interest rate risk analyses. As of December 31, 2025, we were not aware of any known trends, events or uncertainties that have or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our liquidity. As of December 31, 2025, we had no material commitments or long-term debt for capital expenditures.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital management consists of providing equity to support both current and future operations. Primis Financial Corp. and its subsidiary, Primis Bank, are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly additional discretionary - actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action (“PCA”), we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well capitalized under regulatory framework for PCA. Federal banking agencies do not provide a similar well capitalized threshold for bank holding companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2025, that we meet all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
See “Item 1. Business, Supervision and Regulation—Capital Requirements” for more information.
71
The following table provides a comparison of the leverage and risk-weighted capital ratios of Primis Financial Corp. and Primis Bank at the periods indicated to the minimum and well-capitalized required regulatory standards.
Minimum
Required for
Capital
To Be
Actual Ratio at
Adequacy
Categorized as
Purposes
Well Capitalized (1)
Leverage ratio
4.00
n/a
8.80
7.76
Common equity tier 1 capital ratio
9.36
8.74
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
6.00
9.64
9.05
Total risk-based capital ratio
8.00
12.40
12.53
Primis Bank
5.00
9.74
9.10
7.00
6.50
10.74
10.78
8.50
10.50
10.00
12.04
Bank regulatory agencies have approved regulatory capital guidelines (“Basel III”) aimed at strengthening existing capital requirements for banking organizations. The Basel III Capital Rules require Primis Financial Corp. and Primis Bank to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer”, (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer, (iii) a minimum ratio of Total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer and (iv) a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements may result in certain actions by regulators which could have a direct material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Primis Financial Corp. and Primis Bank remain well-capitalized under Basel III capital requirements. Primis Bank had a capital conservation buffer of 3.99% as of December 31, 2025, which exceeded the 2.50% minimum requirement below which the regulators may impose limits on distributions.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements and related financial data presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, substantially all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, changes in interest rates have a more significant impact on our performance than the effects of changes in the general rate of inflation and changes in prices do. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of goods and services. Many factors impact interest rates, including the decisions of the FRB, inflation, recession, changes in unemployment, the money supply, and international disorder and instability in domestic and foreign financial markets. Like most financial institutions, changes in interest rates can impact our net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned from interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings, as well as the valuation of our assets and liabilities.
Our interest rate risk management is the responsibility of the Bank’s ALCO. The ALCO has established policies and limits for management to monitor, measure and coordinate our sources, uses and pricing of funds. The ALCO makes reports to the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.
Seasonality and Cycles
We do not consider our commercial banking business to be seasonal.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and guarantees of credit card accounts. These instruments involve elements of credit and funding risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. Letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. We had letters of credit outstanding totaling $20 million and $10 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is based on the contractual amount of these instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments. Unless noted otherwise, we do not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments are made predominately for adjustable rate loans, and generally have fixed expiration dates of up to three months or other termination clauses and usually require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being completely drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.
For additional information about off-balance sheet arrangements, refer to the discussion in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 15 – Financial Instruments With Off-Balance-Sheet Risk.”
Allowance For Credit Losses - Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures
The allowance for credit losses on off-balance-sheet credit exposures is a liability account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326, representing expected credit losses over the contractual period for which we are exposed to credit risk resulting from a contractual obligation to extend credit. No allowance is recognized if we have the unconditional right to cancel the obligation. Off-balance-sheet credit exposures primarily consist of amounts available under outstanding lines of credit and letters of credit detailed above. For the period of exposure, the estimate of expected credit losses considers both the likelihood that funding will occur and the amount expected to be funded over the estimated remaining life of the commitment or other off-balance-sheet exposure. The likelihood and expected amount of funding are based on historical utilization rates. The amount of the allowance represents management's best estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over the contractual life of the commitment. Estimating credit losses on amounts expected to be funded uses the same methodology as described for loans in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 3 - Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses”, as if such commitments were funded.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
This information is incorporated herein by reference from “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Shareholders, Board of Directors, and Audit Committee of Primis Financial Corp.
McLean, Virginia
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Primis Financial Corp. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 16, 2026 expressed an adverse opinion.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
74
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Goodwill Impairment Evaluation – Bank Reporting Unit
As described in Note 1 and Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or circumstances warrant for both reporting units, Primis Bank and Primis Mortgage. A step one quantitative assessment was performed as of September 30, 2025 to determine if the fair value of the reporting units were less than their carrying amount. To determine the fair value of the reporting units, the Company utilizes a combination of valuation approaches: the comparable transactions approach, the control premium approach, the public market peers control premium approach, and the discounted cash flow approach.
We identified the evaluation of the quantitative assessment of goodwill impairment as of September 30, 2025 of the Bank reporting unit as a critical audit matter because of the significant auditor judgment, audit effort and specialized skills required to audit management’s judgments and subjective assumptions used in determining the fair value estimate, including evaluating the reasonableness of management’s cash flow projections used in the discounted cash flow approach.
The primary audit procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans – Economic Variable Forecasts
As described in Note 1 and Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, for loans segmented into pools based upon similar characteristics and risk profiles, the expected credit loss is measured over the life of each loan utilizing a combination of inputs: (i) probability of default, (ii) probability of attrition, (iii) loss given default and (iv) exposure at default. The various pool-specific inputs may be adjusted for current macroeconomic assumptions. In determining forecasted expected losses, Moody’s economic variable forecasts are used and probability weights are applied to the related economic scenarios. A significant amount of judgment is required to assess the reasonableness of the selection of the economic scenarios and the probability weights applied.
75
We identified the assessment of the economic variable forecasts as a critical audit matter because of the significant auditor judgment, audit effort and specialized skills required to audit management’s judgments used in determining the economic variable forecasts. These economic variable forecasts contribute significantly to the determination of the allowance for credit losses and changes to these assumptions could have a material effect on the Company’s financial results.
/s/ Crowe LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2024.
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 16, 2026
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Primis Financial Corp.’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, because of the effects of the material weakness discussed in the following paragraph, the Company has not maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: lack of proper restrictions and review controls related to deposit account processing for the digital bank platform.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements") and our report dated March 16, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion. We considered the material weakness identified above in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures applied in our audit of the 2025 financial statements, and this report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting does not affect such report on the financial statements.
77
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
78
To the Stockholders, Board of Directors, and Audit Committee
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited, before the effects of the retrospective adjustments to the segment reporting disclosures for the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (“ASU 2023-07”), discussed in Notes 1 and 18 to the consolidated financial statements, the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Primis Financial Corp. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, before the effects of the retrospective adjustments to the Company’s segment reporting disclosures for the adoption of ASU 2023-07 discussed in Notes 1 and 18, the consolidated financial statements referred to above, present fairly, in all material respects, the results of the Company’s operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the retrospective adjustments to the Company’s segment reporting disclosures discussed in Notes 1 and 18, and accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such retrospective adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by Crowe LLP.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts, and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Forvis Mazars, LLP
We served as the Company’s auditor from 2013 to 2024.
Tysons, Virginia
October 15, 2024
79
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from financial institutions
9,690
8,059
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
133,917
56,446
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $174,226 and $262,632, respectively)
Securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $6,560 and $8,602, respectively)
Total loans held for sale
247,108
Loans held for investment, collateralizing secured borrowings
14,843
17,287
3,268,840
2,870,160
Less: allowance for credit losses
(45,883)
(53,724)
Stock in Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank
14,185
13,037
Bank premises and equipment, net
6,070
19,432
Assets held for sale
776
5,497
Operating lease right-of-use assets
65,596
10,279
Cloud computing arrangement assets, net
5,239
8,065
93,459
Intangible assets, net
665
Bank-owned life insurance
68,969
67,184
Deferred tax assets, net
14,683
26,466
Consumer Program derivative asset
4,511
Investment in Panacea Financial Holdings, Inc. common stock
6,899
45,486
50,833
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
554,442
438,917
NOW accounts
862,735
817,715
740,886
798,506
922,337
775,719
315,185
340,178
2,841,143
2,732,118
FHLB advances
Junior subordinated debt
9,929
9,880
Senior subordinated notes
86,233
85,998
Operating lease liabilities
61,340
11,566
28,080
25,541
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 15)
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 5,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding
Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 45,000,000 shares; 24,774,934 shares issued and 24,695,385 shares outstanding at December 31, 2025, and 24,722,734 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2024
247
Additional paid in capital
316,509
314,694
Retained earnings
109,617
58,047
Treasury stock, at cost. 79,549 shares at December 31, 2025 and zero shares at December 31, 2024
(807)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(2,670)
(21,232)
Total Primis stockholders' equity
351,756
Noncontrolling interests
13,226
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
80
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS) AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Years Ended December 31,
Interest and dividend income:
Interest and fees on loans
188,905
199,940
172,788
Interest and dividends on taxable securities
7,209
6,821
5,966
Interest and dividends on tax exempt securities
360
392
407
Interest and dividends on other earning assets
13,457
Total interest and dividend income
192,618
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits
83,690
Interest on other borrowings
10,217
Total interest expense
93,907
98,711
32,540
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
99,139
53,601
66,171
Noninterest income:
5,733
2,021
17,645
184
18,120
1,547
45,250
Noninterest expenses:
58,765
6,239
6,381
Amortization of intangible assets
1,269
3,395
2,929
9,545
1,819
1,507
Loss (gain) on bank premises and equipment and assets held for sale
191
(463)
476
4,641
Goodwill impairment
11,150
3,311
3,006
10,881
10,926
8,167
122,600
Income (loss) before income taxes
72,554
(28,903)
(11,179)
Income tax expense (benefit)
14,713
(4,238)
(1,067)
Net income (loss)
57,841
(24,665)
(10,112)
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
3,602
8,460
2,280
Net income (loss) attributable to Primis' common stockholders
61,443
(16,205)
(7,832)
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities
9,161
742
5,250
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses on available-for-sale securities included in net income
14,719
Other comprehensive income, before tax
23,880
Income tax expense related to other comprehensive income
5,318
197
1,177
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
18,562
545
4,073
Comprehensive income (loss)
80,005
(15,660)
(3,759)
Earnings (loss) per share, basic
(0.66)
(0.32)
Earnings (loss) per share, diluted
81
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2025, 2024 AND 2023
Accumulated
Additional
Common Stock
Paid in
Retained
Treasury
Comprehensive
Noncontrolling
Earnings
Stock
Income (Loss)
Interests
Balance - January 1, 2023
24,680,097
246
312,722
101,850
(25,850)
388,968
Issuance of Panacea Financial Holdings stock, net of costs
23,712
Net loss
(2,280)
Other comprehensive income
Dividends on common stock ($0.40 per share)
(9,875)
Shares retired to unallocated
(1,033)
Stock option exercises
13,500
146
Restricted stock granted
13,000
1
Restricted stock forfeited
(12,392)
Repurchase of restricted stock
(32)
Stock-based compensation expense
712
Balance - December 31, 2023
24,693,172
313,548
84,143
(21,777)
21,432
397,593
(8,460)
(9,891)
(354)
19,000
210
(1,000)
(4)
Restricted stock units vested
11,916
940
Other net changes in noncontrolling interests
254
Balance - December 31, 2024
24,722,734
(3,602)
Panacea Financial Holdings, Inc. deconsolidation
(9,624)
(9,873)
1,200
51,000
Repurchase of common stock
(79,549)
1,800
Balance - December 31, 2025
24,695,385
82
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
9,355
8,928
9,093
Net amortization of premiums and (accretion of discounts)
297
(583)
Proceeds from sales of loans originated to sell
52,744
Purchases of cloud computing arrangement assets
(278)
(364)
(2,913)
Net change in mortgage loans held for sale
11,862
18,329
(28,301)
Net gains on mortgage banking
(32,387)
(23,919)
(17,645)
Net gains on sale of loans
(1,929)
(303)
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance
(1,785)
(1,707)
(1,602)
Gain on bank-owned life insurance death benefit
(703)
(419)
2,904
Gain on sale-leaseback of bank premises
(50,573)
14,777
(32,342)
(159)
(408)
(184)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
6,466
(4,268)
(3,699)
Net change in fair value of Consumer Program derivative
4,352
6,295
(11,279)
Net decrease (increase) in other assets
5,150
(12,345)
Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities
4,736
(3,883)
11,768
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities
10,767
19,530
28,818
Investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of investment securities
129,013
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
(92,083)
(43,066)
(15,211)
Proceeds from paydowns, maturities and calls of securities available-for-sale
37,416
35,592
27,561
Proceeds from paydowns, maturities and calls of securities held-to-maturity
1,173
2,174
1,836
Net (increase) decrease in FRB and FHLB stock
(1,148)
1,209
11,569
Net change in loans held for investment
(426,315)
(311,540)
(338,397)
Proceeds from sales of loans initially originated to be held for investment
113,727
417,544
Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance death benefit
3,264
2,476
Proceeds from sales of bank premise and equipment and assets held for sale
2,308
3,927
Proceeds from sale-leaseback of bank premises
56,875
Purchases of bank premises and equipment, net
(1,734)
(1,194)
Proceeds from sale of Panacea Financial Holdings investment
22,091
Proceeds from sale of other investment
432
Net decrease (increase) in other investments
387
(666)
Net cash and cash equivalents (used in) provided by investing activities
(158,215)
108,297
(312,756)
Financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
215,003
(99,120)
547,688
(Decrease) increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
(366)
874
(3,401)
(Repayments of) increases in secured borrowings, net
(2,422)
(3,198)
20,393
Repayment of short-term FHLB advances
(30,000)
(295,000)
Cash dividends paid on common stock
Proceeds from exercised stock options
(31)
Increase in short-term FHLB advances
Other net changes in noncontrolling interest
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) financing activities
226,550
(140,875)
283,632
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
(13,048)
(306)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
77,553
77,859
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash payments (receipts) for:
89,585
107,197
91,817
Income taxes
(483)
2,336
5,755
Supplemental schedule of noncash activities:
Initial recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets
56,783
1,366
5,311
Loans held for sale transferred to held for investment
101,568
Loans held for investment transferred to loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market
Assets held for sale transferred to other assets
2,220
4,042
Deconsolidation of Panacea Financial Holdings, Inc.
9,624
83
1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company
Primis Financial Corp. (NASDAQ: FRST) is the bank holding company for Primis Bank, a Virginia state-chartered bank, that commenced operations on April 14, 2005. Primis Bank provides a range of financial services to individuals and small and medium-sized businesses.
As of December 31, 2025, Primis Bank had 24 full-service branches in Virginia and Maryland and also provides services to customers through certain online and mobile applications. Headquartered in McLean, Virginia, the Company has an administrative office in Glen Allen, Virginia and an operations center in Atlee, Virginia. PMC, a residential mortgage lender headquartered in Wilmington, North Carolina, is a consolidated subsidiary of Primis Bank. PFH owns the rights to the Panacea Financial brand and its intellectual property and partners with the Bank to offer a suite of financial products and services for doctors, their practices, and ultimately the broader healthcare industry. PFH was deconsolidated from the Company on March 31, 2025, as further discussed below in “PFH Deconsolidation and Sale of Shares”. The operating results of PFH were included in the Company’s consolidated operating results through March 31, 2025.
The accounting policies and practices of Primis and its subsidiaries conform to GAAP and follow general practices within the banking industry. Material policies and practices are described in this footnote.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Primis and its subsidiaries, Primis Bank and PMC. The results of operations for PFH are included in the Company’s results of operations until its deconsolidation as of March 31, 2025, as further described below. Significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Primis consolidates subsidiaries in which it holds, directly or indirectly, more than 50 percent of the voting rights or where it exercises control. Entities where Primis holds 20 to 50 percent of the voting rights, or has the ability to exercise significant influence, or both, are accounted for under the equity method. Primis owns EVB Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”), which is an unconsolidated subsidiary and the junior subordinated debt owed to the Trust is reported as a liability of Primis.
We determine whether we have a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity or a VIE under GAAP. Voting interest entities are entities in which the total equity investment at risk is sufficient to enable the entity to finance itself independently and provides the equity holders with the obligation to absorb losses, the right to receive residual returns and the right to make decisions about the entity’s activities. We consolidate voting interest entities in which we have all, or at least a majority of, the voting interest. As defined in GAAP, VIEs are entities that lack one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. A controlling financial interest in a VIE is present when an enterprise has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The enterprise with a controlling financial interest, known as the primary beneficiary, consolidates the VIE. The Company has investments in VIE’s for which we are not the primary beneficiary and, as such, are not included in our consolidated financial statements.
PFH Deconsolidation and Sale of Shares
On December 21, 2023, PFH completed a $25 million Series B financing round led by a global venture capital firm. As part of the financing round, Primis acquired approximately 19% of PFH’s common stock for an immaterial purchase price due to previous operating losses in the Bank’s Panacea Financial Division. The Company performed an analysis and determined that PFH was a VIE because it lacks one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. The Company’s analysis further determined that it had a controlling financial interest in PFH due to the substantial historical activities between PFH and the Bank’s Panacea Financial Division combined with the limited activities of PFH outside of its relationship with Primis. Further, there were employees of Primis that historically carried out substantially all of the activities of PFH. Accordingly, the Company determined it was the primary beneficiary of PFH and consolidated it as of December 31, 2023.
84
As of March 31, 2025, the three primary executives of PFH resigned from their positions as management-level employees of Primis’ Panacea Financial Division of the Bank. Additionally, Primis and PFH amended their partnership agreement as of March 31, 2025 to allow PFH more control over the type and amount of lending it can perform through the Bank. As a result of these changes in the relationship between the Company and PFH, a re-assessment of PFH under the VIE accounting guidance was performed. The Company determined that PFH continues to be a VIE because it lacks one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity. However, as of March 31, 2025, the Company has determined, based on the relationship changes described above, that it was no longer the primary beneficiary of the VIE because it no longer has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance. Accordingly, the Company deconsolidated PFH as of March 31, 2025. The Company determined that as of December 31, 2025, no circumstances have changed that would result in a change to the Company’s prior conclusion.
Upon deconsolidation, the Company performed an analysis of its two million common share investment in PFH. The Company determined that based on a combination of its level of voting share ownership (19% of total outstanding voting shares), along with meaningful continued involvement in PFH’s lending and operating activities, the investment met the requirements to be accounted for in accordance with ASC 323, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures. As of the time of deconsolidation and initial application of ASC 323, the Company decided to elect the FVO allowed under ASC 323 and accounted for its investment in PFH common stock as of March 31, 2025 at fair value under ASC 825, Financial Instruments. The FVO is irrevocable and must be used in all future periods following election.
For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recognized a gain from deconsolidation of PFH of $25 million, which is recorded in the income statement in “Gains on Panacea Financial Holdings investment” within noninterest income. The gain resulted from recognition, as of the deconsolidation date of March 31, 2025, of the Company’s retained interest in PFH common stock of $21 million, at fair value, and the deconsolidation as of the same date of noncontrolling interest in PFH of $10 million and PFH’s net assets of $6 million. The Company engages a third-party valuation specialist to perform a valuation of the Company’s PFH common shares as of each reporting period, including as of December 31, 2025. The valuation of PFH common stock includes an assessment of the value of PFH primarily using an income approach leveraging a discounted cash flow technique. Key inputs and assumptions in the valuation included projected financial growth of PFH driven by future loan growth assumptions, growth in new services offerings of PFH, and cost savings from fundings provided by customer growth.
Following deconsolidation, the Company continues to originate loans for PFH through its Panacea Division of the Bank, retaining some of the originated loans and selling the remaining. Any loans retained by the Company will be included within net loans in the balance sheet and will be included in the Company’s determination of future expected credit losses, which is the Company’s primary exposure to losses as a result of its continued involvement with PFH. For any originated loans that are intended to be sold, the Company will also include these on its balance sheet until the time of sale but through an agreement with PFH, any exposure to a decline in value prior to sale will be reimbursed to the Company by PFH. The Company will also continue, through the Division, to provide loan origination support to PFH and the servicing of loans retained by the Division.
Following deconsolidation, the Company determined that any transactions between the Company and PFH would be related party transactions under relevant accounting guidance. The primary transactions between the Company and PFH relate to quarterly payments between the parties driven by financial performance of loans originated through the Division of the Bank. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had a payable of $490 thousand included within other liabilities on the balance sheet related to this payment due to PFH. As of December 31, 2025, the Company did not hold any assets on its balance sheet related to PFH that could be used by PFH to settle their obligations. The Company does not have an obligation to provide any future monetary support to PFH. The maximum exposure to loss as of December 31, 2025 as a result of continued involvement with PFH is the common stock investment of $7 million and any potential credit losses on loans originated in the division of the Bank as discussed above.
On June 12, 2025, the Company signed a non-binding term sheet to sell a portion of its retained ownership in PFH common shares after the deconsolidation that generated proceeds to the Company of $22 million. Following the sale of these shares, the Company continued to hold approximately 467 thousand shares in PFH. As of December 31, 2025, the fair value of the Company’s PFH common stock is $7 million, as determined through the use of the valuation specialist and is recorded in the consolidated balance sheet. For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recorded gains of
85
$8 million in the income statement in “Gains on Panacea Financial Holdings investment” within noninterest income related to the sale of PFH common shares and fair value adjustments on its remaining investment.
Disposition of the Life Premium Finance Division
On October 24, 2024, the Company entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with EverBank, N.A. (“EverBank”) for the sale of the Company’s Life Premium Finance division (“LPF”). EverBank acquired LPF from the Company, except for a subset of mostly fixed rate and rate-capped loans that were retained by the Bank. All of the LPF operations, including its employees, were assumed by EverBank following the close of the transaction, which took place in two parts. EverBank acquired approximately $370 million of loans from the division at a $6 million premium at the first close on October 31, 2024. Between the first and second closing on January 31, 2025, EverBank purchased loans generated by the division in ordinary course at par. The Bank provided interim servicing from the first closing until the transition of the business at the final closing when EverBank began servicing the purchased loans and serviced the Bank’s retained portfolio for the duration of the portfolio. From the first closing through December 31, 2024, the Bank sold approximately $400 million of loans and related accrued interest and recorded a pre-tax gain of $5 million, net of advisory and legal fees. As of December 31, 2024, the Bank had an additional $51 million of loans to be sold to EverBank which were recorded in loans held for sale at the lower of cost or market. The Bank subsequently sold approximately $64 million of additional loans at par to EverBank (inclusive of the loans in held for sale at year end) from January 1, 2025 through the second closing on January 31, 2025 at no additional gains.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to change in the near term include: the determination of the allowance for credit losses, the fair value of investment securities and its investment in PFH common stock, the credit impairment of investment securities, the mortgage banking derivatives, interest rate swap derivatives, Consumer Program derivatives, the valuation of goodwill, and deferred tax assets. Management monitors and continually reassess these at each reporting period.
Investment Securities
Securities Available-for-Sale and Held-to Maturity
Debt securities that Primis has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost.
Securities classified as available-for-sale are those debt securities that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, liquidity needs or other similar factors. Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses net of deferred taxes, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Gains or losses arising from sale, call, or maturity of the securities are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into noninterest income in the consolidated income statement at the time of sale, call, or maturity. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company restructured its investment portfolio resulting in the sale of $144 million in book value and realization of $15 million in losses previously recorded as part of other comprehensive income (loss). The realized loss on the sale from restructure of the portfolio is recorded in noninterest income during the year ended December 31, 2025, in “Loss on sales of investment securities”.
Premiums and discounts are generally amortized using the interest method with a constant effective yield without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage-backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. Premiums on callable securities are amortized to their earliest call date. Gains and losses on the sale of investment securities are recorded on the settlement date and are determined using the specific identification method.
86
Primis purchases amortizing investment securities. The actual principal reduction on these assets varies from the expected contractual principal reduction due to principal prepayments resulting from the borrowers’ election to refinance the underlying mortgage based on market and other conditions. The purchased premiums and discounts associated with these assets are amortized or accreted to interest income over the estimated life of the related assets. The estimated life is calculated by projecting future prepayments and the resulting principal cash flows until maturity. Prepayment rate projections utilize actual prepayment speed experience and available market information on like-kind instruments. The prepayment rates form the basis for income recognition of premiums and discounts on the related assets. Changes in prepayment estimates may cause the earnings recognized on these assets to vary over the term that the assets are held, creating volatility in the net interest margin. Prepayment rate assumptions are monitored and updated monthly to reflect actual activity and the most recent market projections.
Non-marketable Equity Securities
Primis has various investments that are considered to be non-marketable equity securities that do not have a readily determinable fair value. Equity securities with no recurring market value data available are reviewed periodically and any observable market value change is adjusted through net income. Primis evaluates these non-marketable equity securities for impairment and recoverability of the recorded investment by considering positive and negative evidence, including the profitability and asset quality, dividend payment history and recent redemption experience. Impairment is assessed at each reporting period and if identified, is recognized in noninterest income.
Other non-marketable investments include stock acquired for regulatory purposes. The Bank is a member of the FHLB system and members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts. The Bank is also required to own FRB stock with a par value equal to 6% of capital. FHLB and FRB stock is carried at cost and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of the par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.
The PMC loans held for sale are originated and held until sold to permanent investors. The Company has elected to carry these loans at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the fair value option under FASB ASC 825, Financial Instruments. The fair value is determined by utilizing quoted prices from dealers in such loans. Gains and losses on loan sales are recorded in mortgage banking income and direct loan origination costs are included in noninterest expense in the consolidated statements of income.
Other loans that the Company has the intent to sell at the balance sheet date have been recorded in loans held for sale, at lower of cost or market. LPF loans as of December 31, 2024 that were originated with the intent to sell to EverBank, as previously discussed, are recorded in held for sale at their par value of $50.7 million, which is the price EverBank paid to purchase the loans in 2025. The Company also made the decision as of December 31, 2024 to sell a majority of its Consumer Program loans, although a buyer had not yet been identified. These loans were transferred to held for sale as of December 31, 2024 and were marked-to-market based on third party bid prices received in its initial marketing efforts for the portfolio. The total transferred to held for sale was $113.2 million which was net of the mark on the portfolio of $20.0 million which was taken in accordance with bank regulatory and U.S. GAAP guidance as a charge to the allowance for credit losses, resulting in the same amount recorded in the provision for credit losses in the consolidated income statement for the year ended December 31, 2024. During 2025, the Company decided it would retain to maturity the Consumer Program Loans it had recorded in held for sale as of December 31, 2024, and transferred the loans back to held for investment at their current book value at the time, which included the previous mark taken at the time of transfer to held for sale.
Loans
Primis provides commercial and consumer loans to customers. Primis also purchases mortgage loans from mortgage loans originators, including PMC. A substantial portion of the loan portfolio is represented by loans secured by real estate throughout its market area. The ability of Primis’ debtors to honor their contracts is in varying degrees dependent upon the real estate market conditions and general economic conditions in their debtor’s market area.
87
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, including purchased premiums and discounts and any deferred loan fees or costs. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest method without anticipating prepayments.
Commercial real estate loans consist of borrowings secured by owner occupied and non-owner occupied commercial real estate. Repayment of these loans is dependent upon rental income or the subsequent sale of the property for loans secured by non-owner occupied commercial real estate and by cash flows from business operations for owner occupied commercial real estate. Loans for which the source of repayment is rental income are primarily impacted by local economic conditions which dictate occupancy rates and the amount of rent charged. Commercial real estate loans that are dependent on cash flows from operations can also be adversely affected by current market conditions for their product or service.
Construction and land development loans primarily consist of borrowings to purchase and develop raw land into residential and non-residential properties. Construction loans are extended to individuals as well as corporations for the construction of an individual or multiple properties and are secured by raw land and the subsequent improvements. Repayment of the loans to real estate developers is dependent upon the sale or lease of properties to third parties in a timely fashion upon completion. Should there be delays in construction or a downturn in the market for those properties, there may be significant erosion in value which may be absorbed by Primis.
Commercial loans consist of borrowings for commercial purposes to individuals, corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, and other business enterprises. Commercial loans are generally secured by business assets such as equipment, accounts receivable, inventory, or any other asset excluding real estate and generally made to finance capital expenditures or operations. Primis’ risk exposure is related to deterioration in the value of collateral securing the loan should foreclosure become necessary. Generally, business assets used or produced in operations do not maintain their value upon foreclosure which may require Primis to write-down the value significantly to sell. Commercial loans also include Life Premium Finance loans. These loans are utilized to pay the annual premiums due on the whole or universal life policy. The Life Premium Finance loans are fully secured by the cash value of the policy and personal liquid assets of the borrower or guarantor.
Residential real estate loans consist of loans to individuals for the purchase of primary residences with repayment primarily through wage or other income sources of the individual borrower. Primis’ loss exposure to these loans is dependent on local market conditions for residential properties as loan amounts are determined, in part, by the fair value of the property at origination.
Other consumer loans are comprised of loans to individuals both unsecured and secured and home equity loans secured by real estate (closed and open-end), with repayment dependent on individual wages and other income. Other consumer loans also include Life Premium Finance loans and Panacea Financial consumer loans comprising of student loan refinancing and PRN loans. PRN loans may be utilized by graduating doctors to fund costs as they move into their chosen professions. The risk of loss on consumer loans is elevated as the collateral securing these loans, if any, may rapidly depreciate in value or may be worthless and/or difficult to locate if repossession is necessary. Losses in this portfolio are generally relatively low, however, due to the small individual loan size and the balance outstanding as a percentage of Primis’ entire portfolio. Also included in other consumer loans are the Consumer Program loans as more fully described below in the Third Party Originated and Serviced Consumer Loan Portfolio section of this footnote.
The accrual of interest on all loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the credit is well secured and in process of collection. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal and interest is considered doubtful.
All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
Most of Primis’ business activity is with customers located within Virginia and Maryland with some consumer loans’ customer base on a national platform. Therefore, our exposure to credit risk is significantly affected by changes in the economy in those areas. We are not dependent on any single customer or group of customers whose insolvency would have a material adverse effect on operations.
Allowance For Credit Losses - Held-to-Maturity Securities
The allowance for credit losses on held-to-maturity securities is a contra-asset valuation account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326 that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of held-to-maturity securities to present management's best estimate of the net amount expected to be collected. Held-to-maturity securities are charged-off against the allowance when deemed uncollectible by management. Adjustments to the allowance are reported in our income statement as a component of credit loss expense. Management measures expected credit losses on held-to-maturity securities on a collective basis by major security type with each type sharing similar risk characteristics and considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Management has made the accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest receivable on held-to-maturity securities from the estimate of credit losses due to the inclusion in its nonaccrual policy. Further information regarding our policies and methodology used to estimate the allowance for credit losses on held-to-maturity securities is presented in Note 2 – Investment Securities.
Allowance For Credit Losses - Available-for-Sale Securities
For available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position, we first assess whether (i) we intend to sell or (ii) it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either case is affirmative, any previously recognized allowances are charged-off and the security's amortized cost is written down to fair value through income. If neither case is affirmative, the security is evaluated to determine whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, management considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency and any adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income. Adjustments to the allowance are reported in our income statement as a component of credit loss expense. Management has made the accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest receivable on available-for-sale securities from the estimate of credit losses due to the inclusion in its nonaccrual policy. Available-for-sale securities are charged-off against the allowance or, in the absence of any allowance, written down through income when deemed uncollectible by management or when either of the aforementioned criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met.
Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans
The accounting policy related to the allowance for credit losses is considered a critical policy given the level of estimation, judgment, and uncertainty in the levels of the allowance required to account for the expected losses in the loan portfolio and the material effect such estimation, judgment, and uncertainty can have on the consolidated financial results.
The allowance for credit losses on loans is a contra-asset valuation account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326, which is deducted from the amortized cost basis of loans to present management's best estimate of the net amount expected to be collected. Loans are charged-off against the allowance when deemed uncollectible by management. Expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off. Adjustments to the allowance are reported in our income statement as a component of credit loss expense. Management has made the accounting policy election to exclude accrued interest receivable on loans from the estimate of credit losses due to the inclusion in its nonaccrual policy. Further information regarding our policies and methodology used to estimate the allowance for credit losses on loans is presented in Note 3 – Loans and Allowance For Credit Losses.
89
The allowance for credit losses on off-balance-sheet credit exposures is a liability account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326, representing expected credit losses over the contractual period for which we are exposed to credit risk resulting from a contractual obligation to extend credit. No allowance is recognized if we have the unconditional right to cancel the obligation. The allowance is reported as a component of other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Adjustments to the allowance are reported in our income statement as a component of other expenses. Further information regarding our policies and methodology used to estimate the allowance for credit losses on off-balance-sheet credit exposures is presented in Note 15 – Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Risk.
Third-Party Originated and Serviced Consumer Loan Portfolio
In the second half of 2021, the Company partnered with a TPOS to originate and service unsecured consumer loans through their proprietary point-of-sale technology (the “Consumer Program”). Loan options under the Consumer Program include traditional fully-amortizing loans and promotional loans with no interest, or “same-as-cash”, features if the loan is fully repaid in the promotional window. The loans are originated at par in the Bank’s name and have a term of 5 to 12 years with a much shorter effective life due to amortization and pay downs.
The Consumer Program is governed by multiple interrelated agreements including the loan agreement between the Bank and the customer and agreements with the TPOS. The structure of the Consumer Program is intended to generate loans that yields a targeted return to the Bank on a portfolio basis while also providing limited credit enhancement from the TPOS. Key characteristics of the combined arrangement include:
Agreements with multiple counterparties, such as the customer and TPOS, are generally required to be accounted for separately in accordance with U.S. GAAP relevant to each unit of account even if the agreements are highly interrelated. As a result, the Company accounts for the Consumer Program under multiple units of account as follows:
90
The Company had $90 million and $152 million of amortized cost balance of loans outstanding in the Consumer Program as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, or 3% and 5%, respectively of our total gross loan portfolio as of each date. As of December 31, 2024, $113 million was included in loans held for sale at lower of cost or market, and $39 million in the consumer loans category in loans held for investment. Loans in the Consumer Program are included within the Consumer Loan category disclosures in Note 3 - Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses. As of December 31, 2025, 3% of the loans, or $3 million, were in a promotional period, with 80% of these promotional loan periods ending through the second quarter of 2026.
In the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company made the decision to cease originating new loans under the Consumer Program effective January 31, 2025 and moved a large portion of the portfolio, with an amortized cost of $133 million, to loans held for sale and marked them to the lower of cost or fair market value. The adjustment to fair market value resulted in additional provision expense and charge-offs of $20 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. The remaining portion of the portfolio of approximately $39 million remained classified as held for investment as of December 31, 2024. During the first quarter of 2025 the Company made the decision to retain until their maturity or payoff the loans previously transferred to held for sale. The loans were transferred back to held for investment at their then current amortized cost basis at the time of transfer, which included the previous fair market value adjustment as required by applicable accounting guidance.
Transfers of Financial Assets
The Company follows the guidance in ASC 860, Transfers and Servicing, when accounting for loan participations and other partial loan sales. Transfers of an entire financial asset (i.e. loan sales), a group of entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset (i.e. loan participations sold) are accounted for as sales when control over the assets have been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. Participations or other partial loan sales that do not meet the definition of a participating interest would remain on the balance sheet and the proceeds are recorded as a secured borrowing. Secured borrowings are initially recorded at fair value which corresponds to the proceeds received for the transfer of the assets, and any failed sale discount is amortized into income over the life of the related asset.
The Company retains servicing rights on the loans sold and records a servicing asset for each of the sold loans at the time of sale if certain criteria is met. Subsequent to the date of transfer, the Company can elect to measure servicing assets under the amortization method. Under the amortization method, servicing assets are amortized in proportion to, and over
91
the period of, estimated net servicing income. The amortization of servicing assets is analyzed each reporting period and is adjusted to reflect changes in prepayment speeds, as well as other factors. Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based on the fair value of those assets. Impairment is determined by assessing the servicing assets based on groupings of predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate and loan type. If, by servicing asset grouping, the carrying amount of the servicing assets exceeds fair value, a valuation allowance is established through a charge to earnings. The valuation allowance is adjusted as the fair value changes. The Company recorded an immaterial amount of impairment of its servicing assets during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. Servicing assets are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company also retains servicing rights on loans transferred under secured borrowings, but in accordance with GAAP does not record a servicing asset.
The principal balance of loans transferred during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 that qualified as sales was $61 million and $392 million, respectively, while the principal balance transferred that was accounted for as secured borrowings was $0 million and $1 million, respectively. The Company recorded $0 million and $100 thousand of servicing assets during the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, in connection with the transfer of loans that qualified as sales. See Note 10 – Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other Borrowings – for additional information on transfers accounted for as secured borrowings.
Bank Premises and Equipment
Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Buildings and related components are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives of 30 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the terms of the related leases including lease renewals only when the Company is reasonably assured of the aggregate term of the lease. Furniture, fixtures, equipment and software are depreciated using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years.
Assets Held for Sale
The Company classifies its assets as held for sale in accordance with FASB ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. When assets are identified as held for sale, the Company discontinues depreciating (amortizing) the assets and estimates the fair value, net of selling costs, of such assets. Assets held for sale are recorded at the lower of the net carrying amount of the assets or the estimated net fair value. If the estimated net fair value of the assets held for sale is less than the net carrying amount of the assets, an impairment charge is recorded in the income statement.
The Company assesses the net fair value of assets held for sale each reporting period the assets remain classified as held for sale. Subsequent changes, if any, in the net fair value of the assets held for sale that require an adjustment to the carrying amount are recorded in the income statement, unless the adjustment causes the carrying amount of the assets to exceed the net carrying amount upon initial classification as held for sale.
If circumstances arise that the Company previously considered unlikely and, as a result, the Company decides not to sell assets previously classified as held for sale, they are reclassified to another classification. Assets that are reclassified are measured at the lower of (a) their carrying amount before they were classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the assets remained in their previous classification, or (b) their fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.
Operating Leases
The Company leases certain properties and equipment under operating leases. The Company recognizes a liability to make lease payments, the operating lease liability, and an asset representing the right to use the underlying asset during the lease term, the right-of-use asset. In recognizing lease right-of-use assets and related lease liabilities, the Company accounts for lease and non-lease components (such as taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance costs) separately as such amounts are generally readily determinable under the lease contracts. The operating lease liability is measured at the present value of the remaining lease payments, discounted at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at inception. The right-of-use asset is measured at the amount of the operating lease liability adjusted for the remaining balance of any
92
lease incentives received, any cumulative prepaid or accrued rent if the lease payments are uneven throughout the lease term, any unamortized initial direct costs, and any impairment of the right-of-use-asset. Lease expense consists of a single lease cost calculated so that the remaining cost of the lease is allocated over the remaining lease term on a straight-line basis, variable lease payments not included in the operating lease liability, and any impairment of the right-of-use asset. Lease renewal options are generally not included in the calculation of the operating lease liabilities, unless they are not reasonably certain to be exercised. The Company does not recognize short-term leases on the balance sheets.
In December 2025 the Company entered into an Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Property (the “Sale Agreement”) with entities affiliated with MountainSeed Real Estate Services, LLC and Fortress Investment Group (“Buyer”). The Sale Agreement provided for the sale to the Buyer of 18 properties owned and operated as retail banking branches of the Bank (the “Properties”) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $58 million. Concurrent with the closing, Seller and FNLR Mud LLC (“Lessor”) entered into a master lease agreement (the “Lease Agreement”) for the Properties under which the Bank, as tenant, will lease each of the Properties from Lessor. The initial lease term shall be 20 years, which may be extended, at the Bank’s option, for an additional 20 year term. The Lease Agreement shall constitute a triple net lease under which the Bank as tenant shall be responsible for base rent for each of the Properties, which during the initial term shall be, in the aggregate, $5 million per annum (“Base Rent”) plus additional operational charges. Base Rent shall increase by 2% per annum for each year during the initial term and any renewal term. The transaction was accounted for as a sale-leaseback under applicable accounting guidance and the Company recorded a gain of $51 million within noninterest income in its consolidated income statement during the year ended December 31, 2025. The Company also recorded new right of use assets of $57 million and lease liabilities of $51 million in its consolidated balance sheet in December 2025 associated with the sale-leaseback transaction.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company follows ASC 350, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which prescribes the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to initial recognition. Goodwill resulting from business combinations is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or circumstances warrant. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on our consolidated balance sheets.
The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment analysis on September 30th of each year with the assistance of a third-party valuation specialist. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below the operating segment level, which is referred to as a component. The Company’s reporting units for goodwill are its two primary operating segments, Primis Bank and PMC. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired. The Company completed the annual goodwill impairment testing for its two reporting units as of September 30, 2025 and concluded that the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of their carrying amounts and no impairment charge was required. The Company performed a qualitative assessment to identify any triggering events as of December 31, 2025 and determined there were not any triggering events that would indicate that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of either reporting unit was less than its carrying value.
To determine the fair value of the Bank and PMC reporting units, the Company utilizes a combination of three or four valuation approaches: the comparable transactions approach, the control premium approach, the public market peers control premium approach, and the discounted cash flow approach. The comparable transactions approach is based on pricing ratios recently paid in the sale or merger of comparable banking franchises; the control premium approach is based on the Company’s trading price, adjusted for holding company assets and an industry based control premium; the public market peers control premium approach is based on market pricing ratios of public banking companies adjusted for an industry based control premium; and the discounted cash flow approach considers the earnings and cash flows that a hypothetical acquirer could realize in an acquisition of the reporting unit. Assumptions that are used as part of these calculations include: the selection of comparable publicly-traded companies and selection of market comparable acquisition transactions. In addition, other assumptions include a discount rate, economic conditions that impact the
93
assumptions related to interest and growth rates, the control premium associated with the reporting unit, and a relative weight given to the valuations derived by the valuation methods.
Other intangible assets consist of core deposit intangible assets arising from whole-bank and branch acquisitions and other intangibles from the PMC acquisition and are amortized over their estimated useful lives, which range from 6 to 15 years.
Stock-Based Compensation
Compensation cost is recognized for stock options issued to employees, based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes option-pricing model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options. Compensation cost for grants of restricted shares is accounted for based on the closing price of Primis’ common stock on the date the restricted shares are awarded. Compensation cost for stock options and restricted shares is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Compensation cost for restricted stock unit awards that contain performance conditions is measured based on the grant date fair value of the units, adjusted for the Company’s best estimate of the outcome of vesting conditions at the end of the performance period.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
Primis has purchased, and acquired through acquisitions, life insurance policies on certain former and current key executives. Bank-owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.
Cloud Computing Arrangement Assets
Primis engaged third-parties to define, design, and develop a new cloud-based banking core for the Company. The multiple phases of the cloud computing arrangement assets are assessed and reviewed as the software is placed into production. Total costs paid is capitalized upon initial launch and production rollout. Amortization is based on the estimated life of the core infrastructure as it relates to obsolescence, technology, competition, and the nature of changes in software. Operating costs such as monthly licensing, usage, and storage are expensed as incurred in data processing expense in our income statements. As of both December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had gross cloud computing arrangement assets of $15 million and accumulated amortization of $10 million and $7 million, respectively.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Premises and equipment, cloud computing arrangement assets, right of use assets, and other long-term assets (other than goodwill and intangibles) are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are recorded at fair value.
Derivative Instruments
Derivatives are financial instruments that meet the criteria in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, to be recognized as either freestanding or embedded derivatives. The Company’s derivatives are recognized as either assets or liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded through noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Primis does not use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Consumer Program Derivative
The Bank has an agreement with a third-party to originate and service consumer loans that are included in the Bank’s loan portfolio. The third-party provides a target return to the Company on the portfolio of loans and all interest received from borrowers above the target return is paid to the third-party as a performance fee. The third-party also provides
94
reimbursement for lost interest when the borrower’s note has a promotional feature that waives accrued interest if the loan is paid in full before the promotional period ends and credit support to the Company in periods when the target return on the portfolio is not achieved. This agreement to pay the third-party performance fees and to receive reimbursement of waived interest and certain credit support meets the definition of a derivative financial instrument. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recorded an asset of immaterial value and $5 million, respectively, in its Consolidated Balance Sheets in the line “Consumer Program derivative asset”. See Note 4 - Derivatives, for additional information about the derivative and the assumptions used to determine its value.
Mortgage Banking Derivatives and Financial Instruments
Mortgage loan commitments known as IRLCs that relate to the origination of a mortgage that will be held for sale upon funding are considered derivative instruments under the derivatives accounting guidance in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Loan commitments that are classified as derivatives are recognized at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in other assets and other liabilities with changes in their fair values recorded in mortgage banking income in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
TBA is a contract to buy or sell mortgage-backed securities on a specific date while the underlying mortgages are not announced until just prior to settlement. These TBA trades provide an economic hedge against the effect of changes in interest rates resulting from interest rate lock commitments. TBAs are accounted for under the derivatives accounting guidance in ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging when either of the following conditions exist: (i) when settlement of the TBA trade is not expected to occur at the next regular settlement date (which is typically the next month) or (ii) a mechanism exists to settle the contract on a net basis. As a result, these instruments are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets as other assets and other liabilities with changes in their fair values recorded in mortgage banking income in the income statements. The fair value of the TBA trades is based on the gain or loss that would occur if the Company were to pair-off the trade at the measurement date.
Forward loan sale commitments are commitments to sell individual mortgage loans using both best efforts and mandatory delivery at a fixed price to an investor at a future date. Forward loan sale commitments that are mandatory delivery are accounted for as derivatives and carried at fair value, determined as the amount that would be necessary to settle the derivative financial instrument at the balance sheet date. Forward loan sale commitments that are best efforts are not derivatives but can be and have been accounted for at fair value, determined in a similar manner to those that are mandatory delivery. Forward loan sale commitments are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as other assets and other liabilities with changes in their fair values recorded in mortgage banking income in the income statements.
As of December 31, 2025, the Company recorded an asset of $2 million and liability of $1 million in its Consolidated Balance Sheets in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, related to IRLCs, TBAs, and forward loan sale commitments (“mortgage banking derivatives”). As of December 31, 2024, the Company recorded an asset of $1 million and no liability in its Consolidated Balance Sheets in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, related to IRLCs, TBAs, and mortgage banking derivatives. See Note 4 - Derivatives for further discussion and assumptions used to value the derivatives.
Interest Rate Swaps
The Company is subject to interest rate risk exposure in the normal course of business through its core lending operations. Primarily to help mitigate interest rate risk associated with its loan portfolio, the Company entered into interest rate swaps in May and August 2024 with a large U.S. financial institution as the counterparty. Interest rate swaps are contractual agreements whereby one party pays a floating interest rate on a notional principal amount and receives a fixed-rate payment on the same notional principal, or vice versa, for a fixed period of time. Interest rate swaps change in value with movements in benchmark interest rates, such as Prime or the SOFR. Interest rate swaps subject the Company to market risk associated with changes in interest rates, changes in interest rate volatility, as well as the credit risk that the counterparty will fail to perform. The Company’s interest rate swaps are pay-fixed and receive-floating whereby the Company receives a variable rate of interest based on SOFR.
95
The Company’s interest rate swaps meet the definition of derivative instruments under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and are accounted for both initially and subsequently at their fair value. The Company assessed the derivative instruments at inception and determined they met the requirements under ASC 815 to be accounted for as fair value hedges. Fair value hedge relationships mitigate exposure to the change in fair value of the hedged risk in an asset, liability or firm commitment. The Company’s interest rate swaps are fair value hedges that are accounted for using the portfolio layer method, which allows the Company to hedge the interest rate risk of prepayable loans by designating as the hedged item a stated amount of two separate and distinct closed portfolios of consumer and commercial loans that are expected to be outstanding for the designated hedge periods. Under the fair value hedging model, gains or losses attributable to the change in fair value of the derivative instruments, as well as the gains and losses attributable to the change in fair value of the hedged items, are recognized in interest income in the same income statement line item with the hedged item in the period in which the change in fair value occurs. The corresponding adjustment to the hedged asset or liability are included in the basis of the hedged items, while the corresponding change in the fair value of the derivative instruments are recorded as an adjustment to other assets or other liabilities, as applicable. The Company presents interest rate swaps on the balance sheets on a net basis when a right of offset exists, based on transactions with a single counterparty and any cash collateral paid to and/or received from that counterparty are subject to legally enforceable master netting arrangements. As of December 31, 2025, the gross amounts of interest rate swap derivative assets and liabilities were $100 thousand and $300 thousand, respectively, and are recorded net in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2024, the gross amounts of interest rate swap derivative assets and liabilities were $1 million and $300 thousand, respectively, and are recorded net in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
The following table represents the carrying value of the portfolio layer method hedged assets and the cumulative fair value hedging adjustments included in the carrying value of the hedged assets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Amortized Cost Basis
Hedged Asset
Basis Adjustment
Fixed rate assets
690,274
150,178
178
818,375
249,190
(810)
One of the Company’s interest rate swaps matured in 2025 and the remaining two interest rate swaps mature in May and August of 2026. Additional information on derivative instruments can be found in Note 5 – Fair Value.
Retirement Plans
Employee 401(k) plan expense is the amount of matching contributions from the Company. Primis matches 100% of the first 3% of the employee contribution, and 50% of the next 3% (maximum of 4.5% match). Supplemental retirement plan expense incurred by the Company is accrued based on a future obligation to provide benefits to retired executives over a certain number of years after their service to the Company concludes.
Loss Contingencies
Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there are such matters that will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Dividend Restriction
Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the Bank to Primis or by Primis to shareholders.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs expensed during the year ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 were $2 million in each year.
96
Income Taxes
Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. We have no unrecognized tax benefits and do not anticipate any increase in unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months. Should the accrual of any interest or penalties relative to unrecognized tax benefits be necessary, it is our policy to record such accruals in our income tax accounts; no such accruals exist as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Restrictions on Cash
No regulatory reserve or clearing requirements with the FRB were needed as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Cash and cash equivalents
Primis defines cash and cash equivalents as cash due from financial institutions, interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold in other financial institutions with maturities less than 90 days.
Earnings Per Share
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to Primis’ common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to net income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by Primis relate solely to outstanding stock options, restricted stock awards, and restricted stock units and are determined using the treasury stock method. Performance awards cannot be dilutive until the Company’s best estimate of the outcome of vesting conditions become probable. Note 16 – Earnings per Share, provides additional information related to our EPS calculation.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available-for-sale which are also recognized as a separate component of equity.
Off-Balance Sheet Credit Related Financial Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, Primis has entered into commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay.
Fair Value Measurements
In general, fair values of financial instruments are based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon observable market-based parameters. Valuation assumptions may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These assumptions may reflect assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation assumptions are applied consistently over time.
97
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. This ASU requires annual disclosure of certain information relating to the rate reconciliation, income taxes paid by jurisdiction, income (or loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense (or benefit) disaggregated between domestic and foreign, and income tax expense (or benefit) from continuing operations disaggregated by federal, state, and foreign. The ASU also eliminates certain requirements relating to unrecognized tax benefits and certain deferred tax disclosure relating to subsidiaries and corporate joint ventures. The Company adopted the ASU prospectively and applied the enhanced disclosures to the current year disclosures, as required by the ASU, in this year’s financial statements. See Note 12 - Income Taxes, for additional information.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40). This ASU requires more disclosures about specific types of expenses included in the expense captions presented on the face of the income statement as well as disclosures about selling expenses but does not change the requirements for the presentation of expenses on the face of the income statement. In January 2025, FASB issued an update ASU 2025-01, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), clarifying the effective date. The amendments in this standard will be effective for the Company’s annual disclosures beginning for the year ended December 31, 2027, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2028, and is required to be applied prospectively, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-03, Business Combinations (Topic 805) and Consolidation (Topic 810) – Determining the Accounting Acquirer in the Acquisition of a Variable Interest Entity. This ASU modifies the Topic 805 framework for identifying the accounting acquirer in certain business combinations when the legal acquiree is a VIE. Existing guidance states the primary beneficiary is the accounting acquirer of a VIE in a business combination even if Topic 805’s general factors used to identify the accounting acquirer (which apply to other business combinations) suggest that the transaction would otherwise be a reverse acquisition. This ASU modifies existing guidance by limiting situations in which entities must identify the primary beneficiary as the accounting acquirer in certain business combinations and requiring entities to consider the general factors in Topic 805 when a business combination involving a VIE is primarily affected through exchanging equity interests. The ASU is to be applied prospectively to annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 for all entities, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) – Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-use Software. This ASU is intended to modernize old internal-use software guidance that is twenty years old to adapt to the agile (i.e., iterative and flexible) basis predominantly used to develop software today. The key changes to the guidance include (i) eliminating accounting consideration of software project development stages, (ii) enhancing the guidance around the ‘probable-to-complete’ threshold, (iii) modifying the website development costs guidance by eliminating Subtopic 350-50 and relocating any remaining relevant guidance into Subtopic 350-40, and (iv) providing new examples to illustrate the applications of the updated guidance. The ASU allows entities to adopt the guidance either (1) retrospectively, (2) prospectively to software costs incurred after the adoption date (i.e. on existing, in-process software projects or new projects) or (3) on a modified prospective basis. The ASU is effective for the Company starting in annual and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-07, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Derivatives Scope Refinements and Scope Clarification for Share-Based Noncash Consideration from a Customer in a Revenue Contract. This ASU expands the population of contracts that are excluded from the scope of derivative accounting. It also clarifies that the revenue guidance in ASC 606 initially applies to share-based noncash consideration received from a customer for the transfer of goods or services. The ASU adds a scope exception from derivative accounting for nonexchange traded contracts with underlyings based on operations or activities specific to one of the parties to the contract. The ASU also clarifies that the revenue guidance in ASC 606 applies initially to share-based noncash consideration (e.g., shares, share options or other equity instruments) received from a customer for
98
the transfer of goods or services. The guidance in other ASCs, including derivatives (ASC 815) and equity securities (ASC 321), is not applied unless and until the entity’s right to receive or retain the share-based noncash consideration is unconditional under ASC 606. The ASU allows entities to adopt the guidance either prospectively or on a modified retrospective basis. The ASU is effective for the Company starting in annual and interim periods beginning after December 31, 2026, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potent impact of adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-08, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) – Purchased Loans. This ASU expands the use of the gross-up method to certain acquired loans beyond those that are purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The gross-up method records an allowance for credit losses at the acquisition date with an offsetting entry to the asset’s amortized cost basis. The ASU applies the gross-up method to acquired non- PCD assets that are ‘purchased seasoned loans’ and provides criteria for determining whether acquired loans qualify as purchased seasoned loans; for purchased seasoned loans, eliminates the Day 1-credit loss expense and reduces interest income recognized in subsequent periods; keeps the guidance for PCD assets unchanged; and results in narrow subsequent measurement differences between purchased seasoned loans and PCD assets. The amendments in ASU 2025-08 are effective for the Company for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and can be adopted prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company cannot predict the impact of applying this ASU on its consolidated financial statements when adopted in the future because it is dependent on future amounts of assets acquired that are within its scope at acquisition.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim reporting (Topic 270) – Narrow-Scope Improvements. This ASU primarily amends FASB ASC 270, Interim Reporting, clarifying the applicability of the interim reporting guidance, the types of interim reporting, and the form and content of interim financial statements. The amendments in ASU 2025-11 are effective for the Company for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. This ASU can be applied prospectively or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the potent impact of adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.
2. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of AFS investment securities and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows ($ in thousands):
Gross Unrealized
Fair
Gains
Value
279
(651)
(547)
(421)
607
(16)
(2,048)
(64)
898
(3,747)
99
105,655
(14,253)
33,500
(3,798)
16,000
(920)
57,908
223
(1,741)
16,315
(2,479)
25,750
(3,572)
7,504
(203)
262,632
237
(26,966)
The amortized cost, gross unrecognized gains and losses, allowance for credit losses and fair value of investment securities HTM were as follows ($ in thousands):
Gross Unrecognized
Allowance for
Credit Losses
(397)
(26)
(423)
(764)
6,998
(75)
1,444
(9)
160
(848)
8,602
During 2025, 2024 and 2023, AFS securities of $92 million, $43 million and $15 million, respectively, were purchased. No HTM investment securities were purchased in 2025, 2024 and 2023.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company restructured its investment portfolio resulting in the sale of $144 million in book value of investment securities and realization of $15 million in losses that are recorded in noninterest income in the consolidated income statement. No investment securities were sold during 2024 or 2023.
The amortized cost and fair value of AFS and HTM investment securities as of December 31, 2025, by contractual maturity, are as follows ($ in thousands). Investment securities not due at a single maturity date are shown separately.
Available-for-Sale
Held-to-Maturity
Due within one year
Due in one to five years
6,355
6,144
Due in five to ten years
4,965
4,355
100
Investment securities with a carrying amount of approximately $26 million and $141 million at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, certain other deposits, a line of credit for advances from the FHLB of Atlanta and repurchase agreements.
Management measures expected credit losses on HTM securities on a collective basis by major security type with each type sharing similar risk characteristics and considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Regarding U.S. Treasury and residential mortgage-backed securities issued by the U.S. government, or agencies thereof, it is expected that the securities will not be settled at prices less than the amortized cost basis of the securities as such securities are backed by the full faith and credit of and/or guaranteed by the U.S. government. Accordingly, no allowance for credit losses has been recorded for these securities. Regarding securities issued by states and political subdivisions and other HTM securities, management considers (i) issuer bond ratings, (ii) historical loss rates for given bond ratings, (iii) whether issuers continue to make timely principal and interest payments under the contractual terms of the securities and (iv) internal forecasts. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, Primis did not have a material allowance for credit losses on HTM securities.
As of December 31, 2025, there were 40 investment securities AFS that were in an unrealized loss position. The unrealized losses related to investment securities AFS relate to changes in interest rates relative to when the investment securities were purchased, and do not indicate credit-related impairment. Primis performs quantitative analysis and if needed, a qualitative analysis in this determination. As a result of the Company’s analysis, none of the securities were deemed to require an allowance for credit loss. Primis has the ability and intent to retain these securities for a period of time sufficient to recover all unrealized losses.
101
The following tables present information regarding investment securities AFS and HTM in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 by duration of time in a loss position ($ in thousands):
Less than 12 months
12 Months or More
Unrealized
value
27,502
(43)
4,802
(608)
32,304
4,323
14,090
6,004
41,592
(59)
38,673
(3,688)
80,265
Unrecognized
5,001
913
5,914
10,233
(102)
80,700
(14,151)
90,933
2,060
(21)
26,642
(3,777)
28,702
16,488
(339)
14,739
(1,402)
31,227
4,359
(161)
2,426
(42)
6,785
33,140
(623)
175,601
(26,343)
208,741
6,927
572
(8)
872
(67)
7,959
(840)
8,531
102
3. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The following table summarizes the composition of our loan portfolio as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
Commercial real estate - owner occupied (1)
Multi-family residential
Commercial loans (2)
Total loans held for investment
Loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or market
As of December 31, 2024, $113 million of Consumer Program loans and $51 million of life premium finance loans were included in loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or market, based on the Company’s decision to sell the loans. The life premium finance loans were sold during the year ended December 31, 2025. At March 31, 2025, the Company determined it would no longer sell the Consumer Program loans and has the intent and ability to hold these loans for the foreseeable future as it intends to run off the portfolio and therefore transferred the loans back to the consumer loans category within loans held for investment at their amortized cost of $102 million as of that date.
The Company has $90 million and $152 million of amortized cost balance of loans outstanding in the Consumer Program as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, or 3% and 5%, respectively, of our total gross loan portfolio as of each date. Loans in the Consumer Program are included within the consumer loans category disclosures in this footnote as of December 31, 2025. As of December 31, 2024, $113 million is included in loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or market, and $39 million in the consumer loans category in loans held for investment. As of December 31, 2025, 3% of the loans were in a promotional period requiring no payment of interest, with 80% of these promotional loan periods ending through the second quarter of 2026.
103
Accrued Interest Receivable
Accrued interest receivable on loans totaled $18 million and $17 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans
Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payment obligations as they become due, as well as when required by regulatory provisions. In determining whether or not a borrower may be unable to meet payment obligations for each class of loans, we consider the borrower’s debt service capacity through the analysis of current financial information, if available, and/or current information with regards to our collateral position. Regulatory provisions typically require the placement of a loan on nonaccrual status if (i) principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection or (ii) full payment of principal and interest is not expected. Loans may be placed on nonaccrual status regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only to the extent that cash payments are received in excess of principal due. A loan may be returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future principal and interest amounts contractually due are reasonably assured, which is typically evidenced by a sustained period (at least six months) of repayment performance by the borrower.
The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of loans held for investment as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
30 - 59
60 - 89
Days
Loans Not
Past Due
or More
5,187
188
1,412
6,787
503,301
31,069
48,022
79,091
488,000
12,259
12,666
119,091
2,071
498
2,274
4,843
572,023
1,544
138,717
138
61,600
2,384
20,642
1,972
24,998
945,494
1,714
1,717
2,095
1,101
149
3,345
312,062
56,692
70,916
7,521
135,129
3,143,698
3,148,554
456
4,021
4,529
471,369
9,539
4,290
13,829
596,653
656
668
100,575
6,694
318
1,462
8,474
580,385
1,098
168
238
1,504
61,450
24,101
1,279
1,954
27,334
581,261
1,886
6,625
7,013
13,638
256,425
48,525
13,776
9,561
71,862
2,810,296
2,815,585
104
The amortized cost, by class, of loans and leases on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, were as follows ($ in thousands):
90 Days
Less Than
Nonaccrual With
Nonaccrual
No Credit
Loss Allowance
472
1,884
559
39,841
275
499
3,846
6,120
31,661
33,633
8,661
730
879
5,807
77,822
83,629
17,851
1,194
1,193
79,016
19,044
431
4,452
641
393
378
130
2,417
3,879
542
780
720
2,674
846
173
864
7,848
5,875
13,723
8,084
1,303
7,178
9,387
There were $2 million of PPP loans greater than 90 days past due and still accruing as of both December 31, 2025 and 2024.
105
The following table presents nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2025 by class and year of origination ($ in thousands):
RevolvingLoans
Revolving
Converted
Prior
To Term
1,609
39,481
721
3,933
283
554
487
7,579
207
22,279
383
990
2,063
132
469
Total non-PCD nonaccruals
7,701
294
23,352
40,355
7,666
2,833
707
Total nonaccrual loans
8,860
Interest received on nonaccrual loans was $500 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2025 and immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Modifications Provided to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty
The Bank determines that a borrower may be experiencing financial difficulty if the borrower is currently delinquent on any of its debt, or if the Bank is concerned that the borrower may not be able to perform in accordance with the current terms of the loan agreement in the foreseeable future. Many aspects of the borrower’s financial situation are assessed when determining whether they are experiencing financial difficulty, particularly for commercial borrowers due to the complex nature of the loan structure, business/industry risk and borrower/guarantor structures. Concessions may include the reduction of an interest rate at a rate lower than current market rates for a new loan with similar risk, extension of the maturity date, reduction of accrued interest, or principal forgiveness. When evaluating whether a concession has been granted, the Bank also considers whether the borrower has provided additional collateral or guarantors and whether such additions adequately compensate the Bank for the restructured terms, or if the revised terms are consistent with those currently being offered to new loan customers.
The assessments of whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty at the time a concession has been granted is inherently subjective in nature, and management’s judgment is required when determining whether the concession results in a modification that is accounted for as a new loan or a continuation of the existing loan under GAAP.
Although each occurrence is unique to the borrower and is evaluated separately, for all portfolio segments, loans modified as a result of borrowers experiencing financial difficulty are typically modified through reductions in interest rates, reductions in payments, changing the payment terms from principal and interest to interest only, and/or extensions in term maturity.
The allowance for credit losses incorporates an estimate of lifetime expected credit losses and is recorded on each asset upon asset origination or acquisition. The starting point for the estimate of the allowance for credit losses is historical loss information, which includes losses from modifications of receivables to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty. Because the effect of most modifications made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty is already included in the allowance for credit losses because of the measurement methodologies used to estimate the allowance, a change to the allowance for credit losses is generally not recorded upon modification. Occasionally, the Company modifies certain loans by providing principal forgiveness. When principal forgiveness is provided, the amortized cost basis of the loan is written
off against the allowance. The amount of the principal forgiveness is deemed to be uncollectible; therefore, that portion of the loan is written off, resulting in a reduction of the amortized cost basis and a corresponding adjustment to the allowance for credit losses.
If it is determined that a modified loan (or portion of a loan) has subsequently been deemed uncollectible, the loan (or a portion of the loan) is written off. At that time, the amortized cost basis of the loan is reduced by the uncollectible amount and the allowance for credit losses is adjusted by the same amount.
The following table provides a summary of the amortized cost basis of loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty during the year ended December 31, 2025 and the related percentage of the class of the loan portfolio period-end balance by the type of modification as of December 31, 2025, excluding Consumer Program loans ($ in thousands):
For the year ended December 31, 2025
Payment Reductions
Interest Only Payment Periods
2,127
70,189
12.38
513
0.37
0.05
23,449
23,972
2.47
3,163
0.10
93,638
96,801
2.95
The following table depicts the performance of loans as of December 31, 2025, at amortized cost, that have been modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty in the last 12 months ($ in thousands):
Payment Status
Current
30-59 days past due
60-89 days past due
90 days or more
30,708
23,479
25,606
31,221
39,974
Consumer Program Modifications
The Company began offering modifications to Consumer Program borrowers beginning on January 1, 2025, in an attempt to enhance collections of delinquent loans and mitigate charge-offs. The primary type of modifications were principal forgiveness of portions of outstanding principal owed and a combination of term modifications to extend maturity dates and interest rate reductions (primarily on promotional loans).
The following table provides a summary of the loan modifications to Consumer Program borrowers experiencing financial difficulty during the year ended December 31, 2025, by the type of modification ($ in thousands):
Term
Rate Change
# of
Adjustment
of Modified
Modified
(Years)
Term and Interest Rate
639
10,084
3.1
(10.24)
Term only
204
N/A
Principal Forgiveness
645
2,636
107
The following table provides a status as of December 31, 2025, of the amortized cost of Consumer Program loans modified since January 1, 2025 by the type of modification ($ in thousands):
Term and
Principal
Status
Modifications
6,830
110
1,099
1-30 days past due
804
31-60 days past due
194
61-90 days past due
Credit Quality Indicators
Through its system of internal controls, Primis evaluates and segments loan portfolio credit quality using regulatory definitions for Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful. Special Mention loans are considered “criticized”, while loans classified as Substandard or Doubtful are considered “classified”.
Special Mention loans are loans that have a potential weakness that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position.
Substandard loans may be inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful loans have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as Substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, based on currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable or improbable. Primis had one loan classified as Doubtful as of December 31, 2025 and none as of December 31, 2024.
In monitoring credit quality trends in the context of assessing the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses on loans, we monitor portfolio credit quality by the weighted-average risk grade of each class of loan.
108
The following table presents weighted-average risk grades for all loans, by class and year of origination/renewal as of December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):
Pass
70,931
53,252
62,228
72,651
58,092
176,323
1,407
8,028
502,912
Special Mention
3,165
Substandard
187
3,737
4,011
Doubtful
72,738
58,279
183,225
Current period gross charge offs
Weighted average risk grade
3.32
3.21
3.41
3.46
3.74
Commercial real estate - nonowner occupied
15,950
21,700
42,907
27,724
41,446
282,205
11,365
3,315
446,612
17,276
4,379
21,655
98,562
262
98,824
45,000
140,008
286,846
3.20
3.61
3.85
5.22
3.70
3.71
2.98
4.07
406
2,031
616
3,133
2,306
3.95
4.23
3.93
2.92
4.12
69,022
12,971
7,081
34,816
166
6,741
461
131,258
7,240
3.10
3.00
3.90
3.63
3.99
3.51
3.65
3.30
53,742
38,550
23,232
141,982
123,591
182,506
4,861
2,663
571,127
267
115
4,003
5,472
38,665
142,499
186,776
5,144
3,217
3.06
3.34
3.09
3.22
3.14
7,009
440
21,344
22,656
82,644
5,384
139,477
271
784
83,157
3.17
3.23
3.82
3.39
562
420
355
312
58,893
61,189
(1)
(2)
540
550
322
59,433
119
169,480
399,604
55,482
143,884
25,566
19,446
92,493
8,292
914,247
4,994
769
2,278
13,510
885
22,437
212
22,281
1,156
2,065
26,259
7,549
174,474
407,183
55,694
166,934
28,227
20,603
108,068
9,309
732
762
3.45
3.92
3.52
3.33
109
849
870
2.00
10,533
96,784
14,093
152,174
16,843
2,590
20,868
534
314,419
315
96,794
14,182
152,719
17,158
2,609
544
264
3,255
13,490
15,838
402
3.03
2.69
3.08
4.01
2.20
4.04
1,113
1,317
4.67
402,629
630,801
206,184
636,405
391,246
778,810
212,746
24,862
13,559
15,866
575
3.29
3.50
3.27
3.76
The following table presents weighted-average risk grades for all loans, by class and year of origination/renewal as of December 31, 2024 ($ in thousands):
41,807
58,979
79,927
65,362
14,830
193,528
1,623
9,280
465,336
3,960
6,392
6,602
65,572
203,880
3.24
3.53
21,857
37,292
56,104
117,439
45,057
295,756
2,486
3,216
579,207
28,371
145,810
298,660
3.72
3.55
4.13
3.84
3.68
2.91
270
2,408
400
3,333
2,786
4.26
3.89
4.14
28,796
22,554
36,762
3,957
8,224
821
101,113
8,354
3.01
3.73
3.69
32,866
33,350
161,816
134,244
37,927
174,569
6,054
2,985
583,811
605
263
2,680
537
4,443
33,025
33,613
162,358
177,854
6,316
3,522
3.13
3.11
3.07
1,356
451
21,692
23,703
17,147
69,360
4,863
564
139,136
18,438
573
852
42,141
69,933
843
3.88
3.91
4.66
211
348
458
3,017
56,813
140
61,459
812
1,464
3,027
57,657
781
5.53
152,489
85,049
179,070
32,374
4,125
22,008
97,721
6,781
579,617
1,276
1,127
2,404
21,967
2,782
26,574
152,520
85,053
202,313
32,757
4,294
23,117
101,630
6,911
196
347
3.35
3.40
3.83
3.75
3.38
111
884
1,754
1,043
2.66
2.36
51,194
17,987
166,307
21,621
3,044
7,718
637
269,045
447
398
914
51,196
18,031
166,813
22,019
3,087
662
19,199
9,777
19,790
4.27
3.37
2.88
2.46
1,890
1,960
1,439
4.81
331,038
256,469
726,317
448,005
120,795
795,987
183,514
25,322
10,160
3.59
3.49
3.31
Revolving loans that were converted to term loans during years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were as follows ($ in thousands):
For the year ended December 31, 2024
995
208
150
1,523
339
1,881
3,256
The recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure were $1 million at December 31, 2025. There were no foreclosed residential real estate property held or in the process of foreclosure as of December 31, 2024.
Allowance For Credit Losses – Loans
The allowance for credit losses on loans is a contra-asset valuation account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326 that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of loans to present the net amount expected to be collected. The amount of the allowance represents management's best estimate of current expected credit losses on loans considering available information, from internal and external sources, relevant to assessing collectability over the loans' contractual terms, adjusted for expected prepayments when appropriate. The accounting policy related to the allowance for credit losses is considered a critical policy given the level of estimation, judgment, and uncertainty in the levels of the allowance required to account for the expected losses in the loan portfolio and the material effect such estimation, judgment, and uncertainty can have on the consolidated financial results.
In calculating the allowance for credit losses, most loans are segmented into pools based upon similar characteristics and risk profiles. For allowance modeling purposes, our loan pools include but are not limited to (i) commercial real estate - owner occupied, (ii) commercial real estate - non-owner occupied, (iii) construction and land development, (iv) commercial, (v) agricultural loans, (vi) residential 1-4 family and (vii) consumer loans. We periodically reassess each pool
to ensure the loans within the pool continue to share similar characteristics and risk profiles and to determine whether further segmentation is necessary. For each loan pool, we measure expected credit losses over the life of each loan utilizing a combination of inputs: (i) probability of default, (ii) probability of attrition, (iii) loss given default and (iv) exposure at default. Internal data is supplemented by, but not replaced by, peer data when required, primarily to determine the probability of default input. The various pool-specific inputs may be adjusted for current macroeconomic assumptions. Significant macroeconomic variables utilized in our allowance models include, among other things, (i) National Gross Domestic Product, (ii) Virginia House Price Index, and (iii) Virginia unemployment rates.
Management applies qualitative adjustments to model results for risk factors that are not considered within our quantitative modeling processes but are nonetheless relevant in assessing the expected credit losses within our loan pools. Qualitative factor (“Q-Factor”) adjustments are driven by key risk indicators that management tracks on a pool-by-pool basis.
In some cases, management may determine that an individual loan exhibits unique risk characteristics which differentiate the loan from other loans within our loan pools. In such cases, the loans are evaluated for expected credit losses on an individual basis and excluded from the collective evaluation.
The following tables present details of the allowance for credit losses on loans segregated by loan portfolio segment as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, calculated in accordance with ASC 326 ($ in thousands). No allowance for credit losses has been recognized for PPP loans as such loans are fully guaranteed by the SBA.
Commercial
Home
Real Estate
Construction
Owner
Non-owner
Secured by
and Land
1-4 Family
Multi-Family
Lines Of
Consumer
Occupied
Farmland
Development
Residential
Credit
Modeled expected credit losses
4,915
3,796
689
709
5,597
3,650
25,835
Q-factor and other qualitative adjustments
433
1,109
670
659
443
395
3,817
Specific allocations
334
10,424
5,157
16,231
4,623
4,194
1,045
6,423
971
511
4,062
3,932
25,762
321
698
158
396
649
694
362
3,319
955
2,074
6,038
15,331
24,643
As part of management’s ongoing review process and as an annual requirement, during the third quarter of 2025 the Company refreshed and recalibrated the historical loss rates, forecast assumptions, and qualitative factor framework of the CECL model. Management considered the need to qualitatively adjust expected credit losses for information not already captured in the loss estimation process. Qualitative reserve adjustments were driven by key risk indicators, that management tracked on a pool-by-pool basis, which included loan-to-value, borrower debt service coverage exceptions and large concentrations. Updated peer groups were also determined in collaboration with the Company’s CECL consultant. Management included banks in Virginia, Maryland, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania that were between $2.0 billion and $10.0 billion in asset size and between $5.0 billion and $20.0 billion, based on a national geography, for the national peer group. The peer group population was further narrowed using statistical analysis with a focus on total loans, percent of charge-offs, portfolio yields, and percent of charge-offs during recession. Following this analysis, management elected to maintain several institutions in the 2025 peer group that would have been excluded due to changing standard deviations for recessionary and recent charge offs to help maintain peer group consistency with prior year.
113
Activity in the allowance for credit losses by class of loan for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 is summarized below ($ in thousands):
Home Equity
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance
Provision (recovery)
(217)
8,363
(455)
(252)
(110)
1,338
3,752
(245)
Charge offs
(72)
(935)
(33,326)
(34,333)
Recoveries
Ending balance
4,255
5,822
1,129
4,938
1,590
364
26,088
1,672
1,613
1,144
(11)
1,887
175
5,380
41,756
(1,427)
(926)
(50,092)
(51,035)
Generally, a commercial loan, or a portion thereof, is charged-off when it is determined, through the analysis of any available current financial information with regards to the borrower, that the borrower is incapable of servicing unsecured debt, there is little or no prospect for near term improvement and no realistic strengthening action of significance is pending or, in the case of secured debt, when it is determined, through analysis of current information with regards to our collateral position, that amounts due from the borrower are in excess of the calculated current fair value of the collateral. Losses on installment loans are recognized in accordance with regulatory guidelines. All other consumer loan losses are recognized when delinquency exceeds 120 cumulative days except for the Consumer Program loans that are charged-off once they become 90 days past due.
114
The following table presents the principal balance of loans that were evaluated for expected credit losses on an individual basis and the related specific allocations, by loan portfolio segment as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
Loan
Specific
Allocations
6,266
98,922
28,764
389
5,129
2,268
628
33,034
25,947
15,057
22,885
Total non-PCD loans
157,327
87,988
24,398
162,183
93,277
A loan is collateral dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the sale of the collateral. The expected credit loss for collateral-dependent loans is measured as the difference between the amortized cost basis of the loan and the fair value of the collateral, adjusted for the estimated cost to sell. Fair value estimates for collateral-dependent loans are derived from appraised values based on the current market value or the ‘as is’ value of the collateral, normally from recently received and reviewed appraisals. The Company calculates expected credit losses on collateral-dependent loans as described when foreclose is probable and also elects to apply it in instances when foreclosure is not probable as allowed by ASC 326.
The following table presents a breakdown between loans at amortized cost that were evaluated on an individual basis and identified as collateral dependent loans and non-collateral dependent loans, by loan portfolio segment and their collateral value as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands). Commercial real estate, loans secured by farmland, construction and land development, residential 1-4 family, multi-family, and home equity line of credit loans are secured by liens on real estate properties. Commercial loans are secured by business assets (inventory, equipment, receivables), residential real estate, and other non-real estate collateral. There has been no significant changes in collateral securing any of our collateral-dependent loans from December 31, 2024 to 2025.
Non
Collateral
Dependent
Assets (1)
3,485
4,229
30,015
70,431
30,130
1,146
1,277
5,848
3,038
786
857
635
32,889
26,424
74,558
66,590
Collateral value
75,375
4. DERIVATIVES
The Company has a derivative instrument in connection with its agreement with a third-party that originates loans that are held on the Company’s balance sheet. The third-party provides credit support and reimbursement for lost interest under the agreement, and the Company provides performance fees to the third-party on performing loans. Specifically, a portion of the originated loans are originated with a promotional period where interest accrues on the loans but is not owed to the Company unless and until the loan begins to amortize. If the borrower prepays the principal on the loan prior to the end of the promotional period the accrued interest is waived but becomes due to the Company from the third-party under the agreement. This expected payment of waived interest to the Company along with performance fees due to the third-party comprise the value of the derivative. The fair value of the derivative instrument was an asset of immaterial value and $5 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The underlying cash flows were immaterial and $5 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The Company calculates the fair value of this derivative using a discounted cash flow model using inputs that are inherently judgmental and reflect management’s best estimates of the assumptions a market participant would use to calculate the fair value. The most significant inputs and assumptions in determining the value of the derivative are noted below ($ in thousands).
Low
High
Remaining cumulative charge-offs (1)
41,325
47,243
Remaining cumulative promotional prepayments (2)
1,403
2,105
Average life (years)
0.3
Discount rate
3.99%
14.56%
28,387
41,994
24,322
53,661
34,366
0.5
4.28%
14.39%
The Company enters into IRLCs to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, at specified interest rates and within a specified period of time (generally between 30 and 90 days), with borrowers who have applied for a loan and have met certain credit and underwriting criteria. The IRLCs are adjusted for estimated costs to originate the loan as well as the probability that the mortgage loan will fund within the terms of the IRLC (the pull through rate). Estimated costs to originate include loan officer commissions and overrides. The pull through rate is estimated on changes in market conditions, loan stage, and actual borrower behavior using a historical analysis of IRLC closing rates. The Company obtains an analysis from a third party on a monthly basis to support the reasonableness of the pull through estimate.
Best efforts and mandatory forward loan sale commitments are commitments to sell individual mortgage loans using both best efforts and mandatory delivery at a fixed price to an investor at a future date. Forward loan sale commitments that are mandatory delivery are accounted for as derivatives and carried at fair value, determined as the amount that would be necessary to settle the derivative financial instrument at the balance sheet date. Forward loan sale commitments that are best efforts are not derivatives but can be and have been accounted for at fair value, determined in a similar manner to those that are mandatory delivery. Forward loan sale commitments are recorded on the balance sheet as derivative assets
116
and derivative liabilities with changes in their fair values recorded in mortgage banking income in the statement of operations.
The key unobservable inputs used in determining the fair value of IRLCs are as follows as of December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Average pull through rates
82.8
89.2
Average costs to originate
1.3
The following summarizes derivative and non-derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 ($ in thousands):
Notional
Derivative financial instruments:
Derivative assets (1)
1,389
52,702
Derivative liabilities
121
132,500
Non-derivative financial instruments:
Best efforts assets
15,100
1,000
34,593
6,352
The notional amounts of mortgage loans held for sale not committed to investors was $90 million and $55 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
The Company has exposure to credit loss in the event of contractual non-performance by its trading counterparties in derivative instruments that the Company uses in its rate risk management activities. The Company manages this credit risk by selecting only counterparties that the Company believes to be financially strong, spreading the risk among multiple counterparties, by placing contractual limits on the amount of unsecured credit extended to any single counterparty and by entering into netting agreements with counterparties, as appropriate.
117
5. FAIR VALUE
ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy:
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis:
Investment Securities Available-for-sale
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, investment securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 investment securities include highly liquid government bonds and mortgage products. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of investment securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flow. Level 2 investment securities include U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions and certain corporate, collateralized loan obligations and other securities. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, investment securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Currently, all of Primis’ available-for-sale debt investment securities are considered to be Level 2 investment securities.
The Company entered into interest rate swaps on a portion of its loans held for investment portfolio that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis. The swaps are valued using significant other observable inputs including prices observed for similar exchange traded instruments and are therefore classified in Level 2. The related loans held for investment are measured using remaining designated cash flows of the hedged item based on the inception benchmark rate component of the contractual coupon cash flows, discounted at the benchmark interest rate being hedged and are therefore classified in Level 2.
The fair value of PMC loans held for sale is determined by obtaining prices at which they could be sold in the principal market at the measurement date and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value is determined on a recurring basis by utilizing quoted prices from dealers in such securities.
The Company calculates the fair value of this derivative using a discounted cash flow model using inputs that are inherently judgmental and reflect management’s best estimates of the assumptions a market participant would use to calculate the fair value. Key inputs utilized in valuing the derivative are discount rates, counterparty credit risk, credit loss rates, and prepayment rates. Discount rates considered observable benchmark interest rates and counterparty credit risk
118
was based on the Company’s evaluation of the counterparty’s financial condition in audited and unaudited financial results provided. The credit loss and prepayment rates are informed by specific experience on the Company’s portfolio of the third-party originated consumer loans that the derivative relates to and are considered significant unobservable inputs. As a result of the use of the significant unobservable inputs the Consumer Program derivative is classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Mortgage Banking Derivative and Financial Assets and Liabilities
IRLC: The Company determines the value of IRLCs by comparing the market price to the price locked in with the customer, adding fees or points to be collected at closing, subtracting commissions to be paid at closing, and subtracting estimated remaining loan origination costs to the bank based on the processing status of the loan. IRLCs are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Best Efforts Forward Loan Sales Commitments: Best efforts forward loan sales commitments are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Best efforts forward loan sales commitments fix the forward sales price that will be realized upon the sale of mortgage loans into the secondary market. Best efforts forward loan sales commitments are entered into for loans at the time the borrower commitment is made. These best efforts forward loan sales commitments are valued using the committed price to the counterparty against the current market price of the interest rate lock commitment or mortgage loan held for sale.
Mandatory Forward Loan Sales Commitments: Fair values for mandatory forward loan sales commitments are based on fair values of the underlying mortgage loans and the probability of such commitments being exercised. Due to the unobservable inputs used by Primis, mandatory loan sales commitments are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
To-Be-Announced Mortgage-Backed Securities Trades: Fair values for TBA’s are based on the gain or loss that would occur if the Company were to pair-off transaction at the measurement date and are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Investment in Panacea Financial Holdings, Inc. common stock: As a result of changes in the relationship between the Company and PFH, a re-assessment of PFH under the VIE accounting guidance was performed. The Company engaged a third-party valuation specialist to perform a valuation of the Company’s PFH common shares as of March 31, 2025. The valuation included an assessment of the value of PFH primarily using an income approach leveraging a discounted cash flow technique. Key inputs and assumptions in the valuation included projected financial growth of PFH driven by future loan growth assumptions, growth in new services offerings of PFH, and cost savings from fundings provided by customer growth. Investment in Panacea Financial Holdings, Inc. common stock are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements Using
Significant
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Observable
Unobservable
Total at
Identical Assets
Inputs
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Assets:
Available-for-sale securities
Consumer Program derivative
Mortgage banking financial assets
Mortgage banking derivative assets
496,237
487,621
8,616
Liabilities:
Interest rate swaps, net
214
Mortgage banking derivative liabilities
335
573,962
568,369
5,593
120
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-recurring Basis:
We may be required to measure certain financial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower of amortized cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets due to impairment.
Collateral-dependent loans are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis and are evaluated individually. These collateral-dependent loans are deemed to be at fair value if there is an associated allowance for credit losses or if a charge-off has been recorded in the previous 12 months. Collateral values are determined using appraisals or other third-party value estimates of the subject property discounted based on estimated selling costs, generally between 5% and 10%, and immaterial adjustments for other external factors that may impact the marketability of the collateral.
Certain loans are held for sale and recorded at the lower of cost or market due to the Company’s decision to sell the loans as of the balance sheet date. The portion of these loans included in Level 1 were valued based on an executed sales contract between the Company and an independent third-party purchaser of the loans that indicates the price to be paid by the buyer and received by the Company. The loans included in this category were the LPF loans sold to EverBank on January 31, 2025.
The other loans in held for sale and recorded at the lower of cost or market are Consumer Program loans and are included in Level 2. The primary input used to value these loans were bid prices received by the Company from independent third parties during the marketing process for the portfolio of loans. The Company received a range of bid prices for the portfolio, which were based on preliminary review of the portfolio by the third-parties and was contingent on further diligence being performed by the potential buyer. The range of bids received during the marketing process contemplated purchase discounts to the portfolio between 9% and 26%. Primis marked the portfolio when it transferred it to held for sale based on its determination of the mid-point of the aggregate of all bids received, which represented a discount of 15% to par. These loans were transferred back to held for investment in 2025 when the Company made the decision to retain the loans and run-off the portfolio.
Assets held for sale are valued based on third-party appraisals less estimated disposal costs. Primis considers third party appraisals, as well as independent fair value assessments from realtors or persons involved in selling bank premises, furniture and equipment, in determining the fair value of particular properties. Accordingly, the valuation of assets held for sale is subject to significant external and internal judgment. Primis periodically reviews premises, furniture and equipment held for sale to determine if the fair value of the property, less disposal costs, has declined below its recorded book value and records any adjustments accordingly.
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
Collateral dependent loans
66,879
50,662
113,170
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount, estimated fair values and fair value hierarchy levels (previously defined) of financial instruments were as follows ($ in thousands) for the periods indicated:
Carrying
Hierarchy Level
Financial assets:
Level 1
Level 2
Preferred investment in mortgage company
3,005
Level 2 and 3
3,182,264
2,564,623
Level 1 and 2
Level 3
752
Financial liabilities:
Demand deposits and NOW accounts
1,417,177
1,256,632
Money market and savings accounts
1,663,223
1,574,225
313,792
339,767
12,151
9,016
90,813
85,987
122
The carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, loans held for sale, mortgage banking financial assets and liabilities, mortgage banking derivative assets and liabilities, Consumer Program derivative, interest rate swaps, demand deposits and NOW accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, FHLB advances, secured borrowings and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
The fair value of junior subordinated debt and senior subordinated notes are based on current rates for similar financing. Carrying amount of Federal Reserve Bank and FHLB stock is a reasonable estimate of fair value as these securities are not readily marketable and are based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value. The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is not considered material. Fair value of net loans, time deposits, junior subordinated debt, and senior subordinated notes are measured using the exit-price notion. The net loans that use level 2 inputs are related to the portfolio of loans underlying interest rate swaps.
6. BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Bank premises and equipment as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 were as follows ($ in thousands):
Land
4,867
Land improvements
1,502
Building and improvements
4,263
18,131
Leasehold improvements
952
3,885
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and software
12,115
10,472
Construction in progress
172
17,330
39,029
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
11,260
19,597
Depreciation and amortization expense related to bank premises and equipment for 2025, 2024 and 2023 was $2 million in each year. As discussed in Note 1 - Organization and Significant Accounting Policies, during 2025 the Company executed a sale-leaseback transaction selling 18 of its retail branch properties that included land, land improvements and buildings and subsequently entering into a lease for the same properties. At the time of the sale-leaseback the Company removed the assets’ recorded cost basis and related accumulated depreciation from its consolidated balance sheet.
7. LEASES
The Company leases certain premises under operating leases. In recognizing lease right-of-use assets and related liabilities, Primis accounts for lease and non-lease components (such as taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance costs) separately as such amounts are generally readily determinable under our lease contracts.
On December 8, 2025, Primis entered into a sale-leaseback transaction covering 18 previously owned branch properties, resulting in a pretax gain of $51 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 (the transaction is further described in Note 1 – Organization and Significant Accounting Policies). The Company’s lease was evaluated and determined to be an operating lease which resulted in recording a right-of-use asset of $57 million and a lease liability of $51 million at inception.
At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had operating lease liabilities totaling $61 million and $12 million, respectively, and right-of-use assets totaling $66 million and $10 million, respectively. We do not currently have any financing leases. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, our net operating lease costs were $3 million, $2 million, and $3 million, respectively. These net operating lease costs are reflected in occupancy expenses in our consolidated income statements.
123
The following table presents other information related to our operating leases as of the periods indicated:
Other information:
Weighted-average remaining lease term - operating leases, in years
Weighted-average discount rate - operating leases
8.4
The following table summarizes the maturity of remaining lease liabilities:
As of
Lease payments due:
2026
7,205
2027
7,242
2028
7,089
2029
6,641
2030
5,883
Thereafter
91,751
Total lease payments
125,811
Less: imputed interest
(64,471)
Lease liabilities
As of December 31, 2025, the Company did not have any operating leases that had not yet commenced that would create additional lease liabilities and right-of-use assets for the Company. The amount of expense related to short-term leases recognized for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were immaterial, and $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2023.
8. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Primis has $93 million of goodwill at both December 31, 2025 and 2024. Goodwill is primarily related to the acquisition of other banks before 2022 and PMC in 2022.
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or circumstances warrant. Our annual assessment occurs as of September 30th every year. For our annual assessments in 2025 and 2024, as described in Note 1, we performed a quantitative assessment to determine if the fair value of our reporting units that contained goodwill were less than their carrying amounts. The Company determined, based on the assessments, that the Primis Bank and the PMC reporting units fair values were more than their carrying amounts and no impairment charge was required.
Intangible Assets
Balances of intangible assets were as follows at year end ($ in thousands):
Gross Carrying
Net Carrying
Amortization
Amortizable Intangibles
17,565
(17,529)
Amortizable intangibles
17,620
(16,927)
124
Estimated amortization expense of intangibles for the years ended December 31 are as follows ($ in thousands):
9. DEPOSITS
As of December 31, 2025, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows ($ in thousands):
274,516
32,967
4,576
1,381
1,745
The aggregate amount of time deposits in denominations of $250 thousand or more as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $108 million and $121 million, respectively. The following table sets forth the maturities of certificates of deposit of $250 thousand and over as of December 31, 2025 ($ in thousands):
34,988
37,094
28,021
7,715
107,818
For our deposit agreements with certain customers, we hold collateral in a segregated custodial account and are required to maintain adequate collateral levels. In the event the collateral fair value falls below stipulated levels, we will pledge additional securities. We closely monitor collateral levels to ensure adequate levels are maintained, while mitigating the potential risk of over-collateralization.
10. SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE AND OTHER BORROWINGS
Other borrowings can consist of FHLB convertible advances, FHLB overnight advances, FHLB advances maturing within one year, federal funds purchased, Federal Reserve Board Discount Window, secured borrowings and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repo”) that mature within one year, which are secured transactions with customers. The balance in repo accounts at both December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $4 million.
At both December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had pledged callable agency securities, residential government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations with a carrying value of $6 million and $7 million, respectively, to customers who require collateral for overnight repurchase agreements and deposits.
125
Other borrowings consist of the following ($ in thousands):
FHLB collateral advances maturing 10/23/2026
Weighted average interest rate at year end
6.76
As of December 31, 2025, Primis Bank had lendable collateral value in the form of residential 1-4 family mortgages, HELOCs, commercial mortgage loans, and investment securities supporting borrowing capacity of approximately $534 million from the FHLB, of which the Company has the full amount available to borrow less our current advances outstanding. Residential 1-4 family mortgage loans in the amount of approximately $343 million and $357 million were pledged as collateral for FHLB advances as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. HELOCs in the amount of approximately $29 million and $30 million were pledged as collateral for FHLB advances as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Commercial mortgage loans in the amount of approximately $162 million and $177 million were pledged as collateral for FHLB advances as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. No investment securities were pledged as collateral as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
The Bank has the ability to borrow from the Federal Reserve discount window borrowing program. As of December 31, 2025, the Bank had borrowing capacity of $484 million within the program and did not borrow under the program during the year.
Secured Borrowings
The balance of secured borrowings was $15 million and $17 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The Company transferred $0 and $1 million in principal balance of loans to another financial institution in 2025 and 2024, respectively, that were accounted for as secured borrowings. The remaining amortized cost balance of the underlying loans was $15 million and $17 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. None of the loans underlying the secured borrowings were past due 30 days or greater or on nonaccrual as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and were all internally rated as “pass” loans as presented in our “credit quality indicators” section of “Note 3 – Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses”. The loans were included in our allowance for credit losses process and an allowance was calculated on the loans as part of their inclusion in a pool with other loans with similar credit risk characteristics. There were no charge-offs of the loans underlying the secured borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. The underlying loans collateralize the borrowings and cannot be sold or pledged by the Company.
11. JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT AND SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES
In 2017, the Company assumed $10 million of trust preferred securities that were issued on September 17, 2003 and placed through a trust in a pooled underwriting totaling approximately $650 million. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, there was $10 million outstanding, net of approximately $381 thousand and $431 thousand, respectively, of debt issuance costs. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the interest rate payable on the trust preferred securities was 6.91% and 7.56%, respectively. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, all of the trust preferred securities qualified as Tier 1 capital.
On January 20, 2017, Primis completed the sale of $27 million of its fixed-to-floating rate senior Subordinated Notes due 2027. Interest is currently payable at an annual floating rate equal to three-month CME Term SOFR plus a tenor spread adjustment of 0.26% until maturity or early redemption. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, 20% and 40%, respectively, of these notes qualified as Tier 2 capital.
126
On August 25, 2020, Primis completed the sale of $60 million of its fixed-to-floating rate Subordinated Notes due 2030. Interest was payable at an initial annual fixed rate of 5.40% and after September 1, 2025, at a floating rate equal to Three-Month Term SOFR, plus a spread of 531 basis points. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, 80% and all of these notes, respectively, qualified as Tier 2 capital.
As of both December 31, 2025 and 2024, the remaining unamortized debt issuance costs related to the senior Subordinated Notes totaled $1 million.
12. INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. Net deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 consist primarily of the following ($ in thousands):
Deferred tax assets:
10,723
12,412
Unearned loan fees and other
1,691
3,201
Lease liability
13,926
2,583
Net unrealized loss on investment securities available for sale
646
5,964
Federal low income housing credit carryforward
274
369
Deferred compensation
1,380
1,458
Capitalized research and experimental expenditures
1,238
Net operating loss
5,460
3,943
2,696
Valuation allowance
(3,457)
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
32,583
31,924
Deferred tax liabilities:
Right-of-use assets
14,929
2,331
Purchase accounting
911
Depreciation
1,693
606
Derivative asset
1,007
328
603
Total deferred tax liabilities
17,900
5,458
Net deferred tax assets
The Company had no valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2025. A valuation allowance of $3 million related to PFH was recorded against deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2024. Management believes that the realization of the remaining deferred tax assets was more likely than not based on the expectation that Primis will generate the necessary taxable income in future periods.
The Company has no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2025 or 2024. Should the accrual of any interest or penalties relative to unrecognized tax benefits be necessary, the policy is to record such accruals in income tax accounts; no such accruals existed as of December 31, 2025 or 2024. Primis and its subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return and individually file numerous state income tax returns. These returns are subject to examination by taxing authorities for all years after 2021.
127
The provision for income taxes consists of the following for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 ($ in thousands):
Current tax expense
Federal
7,046
1,861
State
1,201
771
Total current tax expense
8,247
2,632
Deferred tax expense (benefit)
6,307
(4,178)
(2,699)
(90)
Total deferred tax expense (benefit)
Total income tax expense (benefit)
The Company operates exclusively in the United States and had no foreign income, foreign income tax expense, or foreign income taxes paid for the year ended December 31, 2025.
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to the amount computed by applying the 21% statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to income before income taxes after the adoption of ASU 2023-09 is as follows ($ in thousands):
U.S. Federal statutory tax rate
15,236
21.0
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax effect (1)
1,063
1.5
Nontaxable or nondeductible items:
Sale of PFH common stock
(2,153)
(3.0)
(375)
(0.5)
(6)
Tax credits:
Low income housing tax credit (2)
(74)
(0.1)
Change in valuation allowance
934
20.3
128
The income tax expense differed from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. Federal income tax rate of 21% to pretax income for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 due to the following ($ in thousands):
Computed expected tax benefit at statutory rate
(6,070)
(2,348)
Increase (decrease) in tax expense resulting from:
Remeasurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities
257
(531)
Low income housing tax credits, net of amortization
(506)
(424)
2,342
Research and development credit
(33)
(1,150)
2,098
704
State taxes, net
503
Other, net
(164)
Total income tax benefit
Income taxes paid (refunds received), net, disaggregated by federal and state jurisdictions are as follows for the years ending ($ in thousands):
U.S. Federal
(1,050)
State:
North Carolina
Pennsylvania
216
Tennessee
Texas
State Subtotal
567
Total cash paid for (refunds of) income taxes, net
13. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Primis has a 401(k) plan that allows all employees to make pre-tax contributions for retirement. The 401(k) plan provides for discretionary matching contributions by Primis. The expense for 2025, 2024 and 2023 was $1 million in each year.
The Bank previously maintained a deferred compensation plan in the form of a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for four (4) former executives. Under the plan, the Bank pays each participant, or their beneficiary, compensation deferred plus accrued interest for a period of 15 to 17 years after their retirement or age 62 depending on the terms and conditions of each plan. A liability is accrued for the obligations under these plans and was $6 million and $7 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The expense related to the SERP in 2025, 2024 and 2023 was $281 thousand, $304 thousand and $326 thousand, respectively.
14. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The 2017 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2017 Plan”) was replaced during 2025 and previously had a maximum number of 750,000 shares reserved for issuance. No further awards will be granted under the 2017 Plan, but the plan will remain in effect only so long as awards granted under the plan remain outstanding. The 2017 Plan was replaced during 2025 with the 2025 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2025 Plan”), which has a maximum of 600,000 shares reserved for issuance. The purpose of the 2025 Plan, similar to the 2017 Plan, is to promote the success of the Company by providing
129
greater incentives to employees, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors to associate their personal financial interests with the long-term financial success of the Company, including its subsidiaries, and with growth in stockholder value, consistent with the Company’s risk management practices.
A summary of stock option activity for 2025 follows:
Aggregate
Remaining
Intrinsic
Exercise
Contractual
Price
Term (Yrs)
Options outstanding, beginning of period
35,800
11.73
Expired
(16,800)
11.43
Exercised
(1,200)
Options outstanding, end of period
Exercisable at end of period
There were no stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023. As of December 31, 2025, we do not have any unrecognized compensation expense associated with the stock options.
A summary of time vested restricted stock award activity for 2025 follows:
Grant-Date
Unvested restricted stock outstanding, beginning of period
20,900
13.18
Granted
Vested
(11,650)
14.30
Unvested restricted stock outstanding, end of period
60,250
12.97
3.0
Stock-based compensation expense for time vested restricted stock awards totaled $86 thousand, $354 thousand and $675 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, unrecognized compensation expense associated with restricted stock awards was $696 thousand, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining contractual term.
A summary of performance-based restricted stock unit (the “Units”) activity for 2025 follows:
Unvested Units outstanding, beginning of period
223,460
11.79
2.1
101,500
13.52
Forfeited
(5,000)
10.20
Unvested Units outstanding, end of period
319,960
12.36
These Units are subject to service and performance conditions and vest based on the achievement of both conditions. Achievement of the performance condition will be determined at the end of the five-year performance period for awards granted prior to 2025 by evaluating the: (1) Company’s adjusted earnings per share compound annual growth measured for the performance period and (2) performance factor achieved. Achievement of the performance condition will be determined at the end of the three-year performance period for awards granted in 2025 by evaluating the: (1) Company’s
return on average assets versus peers; (2) growth in noninterest bearing deposits versus peers; (3) total shareholder return versus peers; and (4) performance factor achieved. Payouts between performance levels will be determined based on straight line interpolation. Upon vesting, payout will be primarily Company common shares, but based on the terms of the award and performance factor achieved some payouts may be in cash.
The Company recognized $2.8 million, $586 thousand and $311 thousand of stock-based compensation expense during the year ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, as a result of the probability of a portion of the Units vesting. The potential unrecognized compensation expense associated with these Units was $3 million and $4 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
Primis is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and guarantees of credit card accounts. These instruments involve elements of credit and funding risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. Letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by Primis to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The Company had letters of credit outstanding totaling $20 million and $10 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is based on the contractual amount of these instruments. Primis uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Unless noted otherwise, we do not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk.
Allowance For Credit Losses - Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures
The allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures is a liability account, calculated in accordance with ASC 326, representing expected credit losses over the contractual period for which Primis is exposed to credit risk resulting from a contractual obligation to extend credit. No allowance is recorded if the Company has the unconditional right to cancel the obligation. Off-balance sheet credit exposures primarily consist of amounts available under outstanding lines of credit and letters of credit detailed above. For the period of exposure, the estimate of expected credit losses considers both the likelihood that funding will occur and the amount expected to be funded over the estimated remaining life of the commitment or other off-balance sheet exposure. The likelihood and expected amount of funding are based on historical utilization rates. The amount of the allowance represents management's best estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over the contractual life of the commitment. Estimating credit losses on amounts expected to be funded uses the same methodology as described for loans in Note 3 - Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses, as if such commitments were funded. The allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures is reflected in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
The following table details activity in the allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures ($ in thousands):
Balance as of January 1
1,121
1,579
Credit loss benefit
(115)
(458)
Balance as of December 31
1,006
Commitments
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer if there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments are made predominately for adjustable rate loans, and generally have fixed expiration dates of up to three months or other termination clauses and usually require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being completely drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.
The Company had $63 million in mortgage loan commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2025 related to approved mortgage loan applications although not all approved applications will ultimately fund.
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had unfunded lines of credit and undisbursed construction loan funds totaling $567 million and $459 million, respectively, not all of which are expected to be drawn. Virtually all of our unfunded lines of credit and undisbursed construction loan funds are variable rate instruments. The amount of certificate of deposit accounts maturing in less than one year was $275 million as of December 31, 2025. Management anticipates that funding requirements for these commitments will be met in the normal course of business.
Primis also had outstanding commitments under subscription agreements entered into for investments in non-marketable equity securities of $1 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.
16. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following is a reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computations ($ in thousands, except per share data):
Income
(Numerator)
(Denominator)
Basic EPS
24,668
Effect of dilutive stock options and unvested restricted stock
Diluted EPS
24,683
24,688
For the year ended December 31, 2023
24,639
Diluted EPS from continuing operations
The Company had 17,800, 35,800 and 54,800 anti-dilutive options as of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
17. REGULATORY MATTERS
Primis Financial Corp. and its subsidiary bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory - and possibly additional discretionary - actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for PCA, Primis must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well capitalized under regulatory framework for PCA.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Primis to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2025, that Primis meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.
The following table provides a comparison of the leverage and risk-weighted capital ratios of Primis Financial Corp. and Primis Bank at the periods indicated to the minimum and well-capitalized required regulatory standards:
Required
For Capital
To Be Categorized as
Actual
Adequacy Purposes
Ratio
342,071
155,519
332,071
159,604
212,805
439,837
283,741
377,278
154,887
193,609
158,045
228,288
210,727
280,969
421,216
351,212
288,646
148,827
278,646
143,467
191,289
399,483
255,052
338,140
148,570
185,713
141,113
203,830
188,150
250,867
377,531
313,584
Primis Financial Corp. and Primis Bank are required to meet minimum capital requirements set forth by regulatory authorities. Bank regulatory agencies have approved regulatory capital guidelines (“Basel III”) aimed at strengthening existing capital requirements for banking organizations. The Basel III Capital Rules require Primis Financial Corp. and Primis Bank to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%,
133
plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer”, (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer, (iii) a minimum ratio of Total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer and (iv) a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements may result in certain actions by regulators which could have a direct material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
18. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company’s reportable operating segments are determined based on its internal organizational structure, which is overseen by the CEO, the Company’s designated Chief Operating Decision Maker. While the CEO consults with key members of his leadership team, the ultimate responsibility for making operational decisions and resource allocations resides with the CEO. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Company’s internal organizational structure and resulting management reporting was concentrated around the Bank and Primis Mortgage, which resulted in the Company determining these to be its two reportable segments.
Primis’ organizational structure and its operational segments are determined by attributes such as products, services, and customer base which are then aggregated based on similarities around these attributes. The operating results for each segment are regularly reviewed by the CEO using a broad set of financial and operational data. Key financial data utilized by the CEO to assess financial performance and allocate resources includes loan and deposit growth, certain direct expenses, net interest income and mortgage banking income along with overall net income attributable to Primis’ common shareholders. The CEO also considers actual results compared to budgeted results in these metrics when assessing performance and making determinations related to resource allocations. The following is a description of the Company’s reportable segments.
Primis Bank. This segment specializes in providing financing services to businesses in various industries along with consumer and residential loans to individuals. The segment also provides deposit-related services to businesses, non-profits, municipalities, and individual consumers. The primary source of revenue for this segment is interest income from the origination of loans, while the primary expenses are interest expenses on deposits, provisions for loan losses, personnel costs, and data processing expenses.
Primis Mortgage. This segment specializes in originating mortgages in a majority of the U.S. The primary source of revenue for this segment is noninterest income generated from the origination and sale of mortgage loans, while the primary expense of the segment is personnel costs.
134
The following table provides financial information for the Company's reportable segments. In addition to the Company’s two reportable segments as described above, the caption “Other” has been included to provide reconciliation of the Company’s consolidated results and includes operational costs that are not a part of the two reportable segments but don’t qualify to be considered a separate reportable segment. “Other” primarily includes the Primis Bank Holding Company and PFH, which are generally cost centers to the consolidated entity, along with elimination adjustments to reconcile the results of the reportable segments to the consolidated financial statements prepared in conformity with GAAP.
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2025
($ in thousands)
Other (1)
Consolidated Company
Interest income
192,845
Interest expense
81,613
7,401
Net interest income (loss)
111,232
(7,210)
Provision for loan losses
12,176
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses
7,294
99,056
(7,211)
33,032
(645)
46,958
33,005
79,963
46,313
28,173
43,888
9,885
4,344
42,964
49,200
33,308
96,737
8,890
Income before income taxes
7,018
48,632
16,904
Income tax expense
1,527
10,832
2,354
5,491
37,800
14,550
18,152
192,938
4,022,924
(168,474)
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2024
205,183
99,796
6,951
105,387
(6,736)
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
54,766
24,423
(504)
18,975
19,221
18,471
19,667
38,271
8,677
464
10,100
3,865
41,200
3,400
48,465
23,996
89,571
12,077
5,998
(16,334)
(18,567)
1,029
(3,555)
(1,712)
4,969
(12,779)
(16,855)
(8,395)
99,353
3,579,720
11,042
135
As of and for the year ended December 31, 2023
2,813
189,564
241
87,029
6,878
102,535
(6,637)
69,995
27,576
27,605
17,674
16,551
38,635
3,579
9,176
3,233
50,488
569
54,290
20,153
98,299
4,148
(728)
(10,785)
(1,470)
331
(1,128)
(9,315)
66,282
3,782,050
8,214
3,856,546
136
19. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Condensed financial information of Primis Financial Corp. follows:
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31,
Cash
34,941
26,696
Investment in subsidiaries and associated companies
468,413
409,108
Preferred investment in unaffiliated mortgage company
Investments in non-marketable equity securities
5,210
4,602
3,215
4,797
522,183
449,208
3,125
1,574
99,287
97,452
Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 45,000,000 shares; 24,744,934 shares issued and 24,695,385 shares outstanding at December 31, 2025, and 24,722,734 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2024
137
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
Income:
Cash dividends received from bank subsidiary
20,000
Other investment income
502
Total income
37,884
20,215
20,241
Expenses:
Interest on junior subordinated debt
806
912
887
Interest on senior subordinated notes
6,595
6,039
5,992
4,136
1,396
1,335
Total expenses
11,537
8,347
Income before income tax expense (benefit) and equity in undistributed net income (loss) of subsidiaries
26,347
11,868
12,027
2,353
Equity in undistributed net income (loss) of subsidiaries and associated companies
37,449
(29,785)
(20,797)
Net income (loss) to common stockholders
(7,300)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities:
Equity in undistributed net income or loss of subsidiaries and associated companies
(42,449)
9,787
797
Loan forgiven
2,371
(581)
(350)
Net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities
(7,573)
(6,499)
(6,353)
Proceeds from sale of Panacea Financial Holdings
Increase in non-marketable equity securities investments
(747)
(1,536)
Dividend from subsidiaries
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by investing activities
26,483
19,253
18,464
Net cash and cash equivalents used in financing activities
(10,665)
(9,685)
(9,760)
8,245
3,069
2,351
23,627
21,276
20. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the year, officers, directors, principal shareholders, and their affiliates (related parties) were customers of and had transactions with the Company. Loan activity to related parties is as follows ($ in thousands):
Balance at January 1,
Principal advances
3,557
Principal paid
(3,320)
Balance at December 31,
17,202
Primis has also entered into deposit transactions with its related parties. The aggregate amount of these deposit accounts were $17 million and $30 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
139
21. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
Variable interests are defined as contractual ownership or other interests in an entity that change with fluctuations in the fair value of an entity's net asset value. The primary beneficiary is defined as the enterprise that has both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE and is required to consolidate the VIE.
Our involvement with VIEs includes our investments in PFH, low income housing tax credit funds, and non-marketable and other equity securities.
PFH
PFH is a separate legal entity that owns the rights to the Panacea Financial brand and intellectual property with a goal of growing and monetizing those assets. The Panacea Financial Division of the Bank has a partnership agreement with PFH and is the primary bank partner. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company consolidated PFH as the primary beneficiary as a result of determining it had a controlling financial interest in PFH due to the substantial activities between PFH and the Panacea Financial Division of the Bank along with limited activities of PFH outside of its relationship with the Company. As of December 31, 2024, PFH had approximately $13 million of cash and $246 thousand of other receivables and a nominal amount of prepaid insurance assets and $3 million of accrued legal and other liabilities that are included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. PFH’s cash was on deposit with the bank and was eliminated in consolidation. PFH’s assets may only be used to settle PFH’s liabilities and PFH’s creditors do not have any recourse to the Company related to PFH’s liabilities.
As discussed in Note 1 – Organization and Significant Accounting Policies, the Company reassessed its relationship with PFH in 2025 and determined it remained a VIE but the Company no longer had a controlling financial interest, was not the primary beneficiary, and therefore de-consolidated PFH from the Company as of March 31, 2025. The Company also determined that no circumstances had changed since that assessment that would result in a different conclusion as of December 31, 2025.
As part of the Company's agreement with PFH, the Company has agreed to pay PFH excess profits in the Panacea Financial Division of the Bank above a target hurdle return on average assets in the division. In periods where the profits in the Panacea division do not reach the hurdle amount, PFH reimburses the Company up to that amount. The target return was not achieved by the Panacea division in 2025 and 2024, requiring reimbursement from PFH. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company did not provide any financial or other support to PFH that it was not contractually required to provide.
Low Income Housing Tax Credits
The general purpose of housing equity funds is to encourage and assist participants in investing in low-income residential rental properties located in the Commonwealth of Virginia, develop and implement strategies to maintain projects as low-income housing, deliver Federal Low Income Housing Credits to investors, allocate tax losses and other possible tax benefits to investors, and to preserve and protect project assets. The Company applies the proportional amortization method to its low income housing tax credits.
Non-Marketable and Other equity investments
The Company also has a limited interest in several funds that focus on providing venture capital to new and emerging financial technology companies, which are accounted for as VIEs. Investments held by the Company in these third-party funds do not have controlling or significant variable interests.
The low income housing tax credit funds and non-marketable and other equity investments meet the criteria of a VIE, however, the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the entities, as it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entities and their accounts are not included in the
Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company’s investment in the VIEs were carried as other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
The low income housing tax credit funds were carried at $2 million as of both December 31, 2025 and 2024. Tax credits, net of amortization recognized related to these investments during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were $35 thousand and $19 thousand, respectively. Additional capital calls expected for the funds totaled $145 thousand and $220 thousand as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively and are accrued for in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Non-marketable and other equity investments held by the Company are carried at $7 million as of both December 31, 2025 and 2024. Primis also makes commitments on the subscription agreements entered into for the investments in non-marketable equity securities. For additional details, see Note 15 – Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risks.
The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from unconsolidated VIEs is the higher of the investment recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets or the commitment on the investment. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the maximum exposure to loss for our unconsolidated VIEs was $7 million and $10 million, respectively.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, at the reasonable assurance level, because of the material weaknesses in internal controls as described below in section (b). Notwithstanding the material weaknesses, the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, has concluded that the consolidated financial statements, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2025, fairly present, in all material respects, the Company's financial condition, results of operations and cash-flows for the periods presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Management identified a material weakness in internal controls over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2025. The material weakness was related to an existing material weakness around deposit account processing and review in our two deposit cores, the legacy core and the digital bank platform. During 2025, the material weakness relates to the lack of proper restrictions and review controls for deposit account processing in the digital bank platform. The existing controls do not include sufficient restrictions for transfers between deposit accounts, including into
or out of an individual’s own deposit account. The Company’s existing controls also do not contain a sufficient level of detail around review of deposit processing to determine that an appropriate level of segregation of duties is being maintained. The material weakness did not result in any identified financial statement misstatements.
Crowe, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and has issued a report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, which report is included in "Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Remediation Plans
Management continues to review and make changes to the overall design of its internal control environment, including implementation of a sufficient level of restrictions and controls around deposit account processing. The Company’s work to remediate the material weakness is underway and includes supplementing controls related to deposit account processing in the digital bank platform as follows:
In addition to the above planned control enhancements in the digital bank platform, the Company strengthened its process and controls in the legacy core during 2025 to remediate its material weakness as follows:
Management may determine that additional measures are required to address control deficiencies, strengthen internal control over financial reporting, or it may determine to modify the remediation measures described above. The actions the Company is taking are subject to ongoing executive management review and are also subject to Audit Committee oversight. If the Company is unable to successfully remediate the material weaknesses, or if in the future, the Company identifies further material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting, the Company may not detect errors on a timely basis, and its condensed consolidated financial statements may be materially misstated.
(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Except for the material weakness noted above, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2025 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
During the year ended December 31, 2025, there were no Rule 10b5-1 plans or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangements adopted, modified or terminated by any director or officer of the Company.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information under the captions "Election of Directors,” "Continuing Directors and Executive Officers," "Corporate Governance — Committees of the Board of Directors— Audit Committee,” "Corporate Governance — Director Nominations Process" and "Corporate Governance — Code of Ethics" in Primis Financial Corp.’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2026 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days after December 31, 2025 pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act (the "2026 Proxy Statement"), is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information under the captions "Executive Compensation and Other Matters," "Director Compensation" and "Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation" in the 2026 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters
The information under the caption "Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock by Management of the Company and Principal Stockholders" in the 2026 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
The information required by this Item concerning securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference to Part II, Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 13. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence
The information under the captions "Corporate Governance — Director Independence" and "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions" in the 2026 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025 is Crowe LLP (“Crowe”) (PCAOB Firm ID No. 173) located in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. The information under the caption "Fees and Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the 2026 Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements and reports of independent registered public accounting firm are in Part II, Item 8:
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
Consolidated Balance Sheets - December 31, 2025 and 2024
Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity - Years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -Years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules are omitted since they are not required, are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits
The following are filed or furnished, as noted below, as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and this list includes the Exhibit Index.
Exhibit No.
Description
Articles of Incorporation (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-136285) filed on August 4, 2006)
3.2
Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation dated January 31, 2005 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-136285) filed on August 4, 2006)
3.3
Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation dated April 13, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-136285) filed on August 4, 2006)
3.4
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation dated March 31, 2021 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 31, 2021)
Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation dated July 2, 2025 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2025)
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2025)
4.1
Specimen Stock Certificate of Southern National (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-136285))
4.2
Form of Warrant Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-136285))
Form of Amendment to Warrant Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-136285))
4.4
Form of 5.875% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due January 31, 2027 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2017)
4.5*
Description of Registrant’s Securities
Certain instruments relating to long-term debt as to which the total amount of securities authorized there under does not exceed 10% of the total assets of Primis Financial Corp. (formerly Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.) have been omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K. The registrant will furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon its request.
4.6
Subordinated Indenture, dated as of August 25, 2020, between Primis Financial Corp. (formerly Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.) and Wilmington Trust, National Association (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 25, 2020)
4.7
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 25, 2020, between Primis Financial Corp. (formerly Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.) and Wilmington Trust, National Association (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 25, 2020)
4.8
Form of 5.40% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due 2030 (included in Exhibit 4.7)
10.1+
Form of Primis Financial Corp. (formerly Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.) Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed on October 29, 2009 (Registration No. 333-162467))
10.2+
Primis Financial Corp. (formerly Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.) 2010 Stock Awards and Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-166511))
10.3+
Primis Financial Corp. (formerly Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.) 2017 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A of Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 11, 2017)
10.4+
Form of Primis Financial Corp. (formerly Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.) Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-166511))
10.5+
Primis Financial Corp. (formerly Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.) Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2017)
10.6+
Primis Financial Corp. (formerly Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.) Executive Severance Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 26, 2017)
10.7+
Form of Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement, dated January 20, 2017 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Primis Financial Corp.’s (formerly Southern National’s) Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 24, 2017)
10.8+
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 10, 2021, by and between Matthew Switzer and Primis Financial Corp. (formerly Southern National) (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2021)
10.9+
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of September 13, 2021, by and between Ann-Stanton C. Gore and Primis Financial Corp. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 14, 2021)
145
10.10+
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2022, by and between Dennis J. Zember, Jr. and Primis Financial Corp. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2023)
10.11+
Amendment to Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2021, by and between Dennis J. Zember and Primis Financial Corp., effective as of October 26, 2023 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on October 15, 2024)
10.12+
Amendment to Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2022, by and between Dennis J. Zember and Primis Financial Corp., effective as of October 26, 2023 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on October 15, 2024)
10.13+
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2023, by and among Rickey Allen Fulk, Primis Financial Corp. and Primis Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on October 15, 2024)
10.14+
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January 27, 2025, by and between Ryan Lysaght Gorney and Primis Financial Corp. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 29, 2025)
10.15+*
Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of November 17, 2025, by and between Donald C. Savino and Primis Financial Corp.
10.16+*
Amendment to Primis Financial Corp.’s Outstanding Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, effective as of December 17, 2025
10.17+*
Amendment to Outstanding Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, by and between Dennis J. Zember and Primis Financial Corp., effective as of December 18, 2025
10.18+*
Primis Financial Corp.’s Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, effective as of December 18, 2025
10.19
Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated October 24, 2024 by and between Primis Bank and EverBank, National Association (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 6, 2024.
Insider Trading Policy (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 19 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 29, 2025)
21.0*
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1*
Consent of Crowe LLP
23.2*
Consent of Forvis Mazars, LLP
31.1*
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002
32.1**
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Primis Financial Corp. Clawback Policy, adopted by the Board of Directors on November 28, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 97 to Primis Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on October 15, 2024).
The following materials from Primis Financial Corp.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (Inline XBRL), filed herewith: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The cover page from Primis Financial Corp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, formatted in Inline XBRL.
+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
* Filed herewith
** Furnished herewith
Item 16. - Form 10-K Summary
Primis Financial Corp. will furnish, upon written request, a copy of any exhibit listed above upon the payment of a reasonable fee covering the expense of furnishing the copy. Requests should be directed to:
Matthew Switzer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
10900 Nuckols Road, Suite 325
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
By:
/s/ Dennis J. Zember, Jr.
Date: March 16, 2026
Dennis J. Zember, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Matthew Switzer
Matthew Switzer
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
President and Chief Executive Officer, Director
/s/ John F. Biagas
Director
John F. Biagas
/s/ Robert Y. Clagett
Robert Y. Clagett
/s/ W. Rand Cook
W. Rand Cook
/s/ Deborah Diaz
Deborah Diaz
/s/ F. L. Garrett, III
F. L. Garrett, III
/s/ Eric A. Johnson
Eric A. Johnson
/s/ Charles A. Kabbash
Charles A. Kabbash
/s/ Dr. Allen R. Jones Jr.
Dr. Allen R. Jones Jr.
/s/ John M. Eggemeyer
John M. Eggemeyer