Nicolet Bankshares
NIC
#3925
Rank
$3.32 B
Marketcap
$155.77
Share price
-1.58%
Change (1 day)
42.00%
Change (1 year)

Nicolet Bankshares - 10-Q quarterly report FY2013 Q2


Text size:



  UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
   
 
 
FORM 10-Q
 
 
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
 
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from___________ to___________
 
Commission file number 333-90052
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
WISCONSIN
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
47-0871001
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
111 North Washington Street
Green Bay, Wisconsin 54301
(920) 430-1400
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
Registrant’s principal executive offices)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o      Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
 
As of August 5, 2013 there were 4,227,622 shares of $0.01 par value common stock outstanding.
 
 
 

 

 
Nicolet Bankshares, Inc.
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
PAGE
         
 
Item 1.
Financial Statements:
   
         
   
Consolidated Balance Sheets
   
   
June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012
 
3
         
   
Consolidated Statements of Income
   
   
Three Months and Six Months Ended June  30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)
 
4
         
   
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
   
   
Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)
 
5
         
   
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
   
   
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 (unaudited)
 
6
         
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
   
   
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)
 
7
         
   
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
8-26
         
 
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
27-50
         
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
51
         
 
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
 
51
         
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
   
         
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
 
51
         
 
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
 
51
         
 
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of  Proceeds
 
51
         
 
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
51
         
 
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
 
51
         
 
Item 5.
Other Information
 
51
         
 
Item 6.
Exhibits
 
52
         
   
Signatures
 
52
 
 
 

 

 
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements:
 
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
 
   
June 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
  
December 31, 2012
(Audited)
 
Assets
      
Cash and due from banks
 $7,511  $26,988 
Interest-earning deposits
  27,998   54,516 
Federal funds sold
  637   499 
Cash and cash equivalents
  36,146   82,003 
Certificates of deposit in other banks
  1,960   - 
Securities available for sale (“AFS”)
  129,988   55,901 
Other investments
  7,531   5,221 
Loans held for sale
  3,142   7,323 
Loans
  840,546   552,601 
Allowance for loan losses
  (7,658)  (7,120)
Loans, net
  832,888   545,481 
Premises and equipment, net
  29,224   19,602 
Bank owned life insurance
  23,352   18,697 
Accrued interest receivable and other assets
  24,209   11,027 
Total assets
 $1,088,440  $745,255 
 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
        
Liabilities:
        
Demand
 $150,460  $108,234 
Money market and NOW accounts
  387,378   322,507 
Savings
  90,201   46,907 
Time
  280,044   138,445 
Total deposits
  908,083   616,093 
Short-term borrowings
  33,231   4,035 
Notes payable
  25,040   35,155 
Junior subordinated debentures
  12,029   6,186 
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
  8,730   6,408 
     Total liabilities
  987,113   667,877 
          
Stockholders’ Equity:
        
Preferred equity
  24,400   24,400 
Common stock
  42   34 
Additional paid-in capital
  49,147   36,243 
Retained earnings
  26,575   14,973 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”)
  1,140   1,683 
Total Nicolet Bankshares Inc. stockholders’ equity
  101,304   77,333 
Noncontrolling interest
  23   45 
Total stockholders’ equity and noncontrolling interest
  101,327   77,378 
         
Total liabilities, noncontrolling interest and stockholders’ equity
 $1,088,440  $745,255 
         
Preferred shares authorized (no par value)
  10,000,000   10,000,000 
Preferred shares issued
  24,400   24,400 
Common shares authorized (par value $0.01 per share)
  30,000,000   30,000,000 
Common shares outstanding
  4,227,622   3,425,413 
Common shares issued
  4,279,745   3,479,888 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
3
 

 

 
ITEM 1.  Financial Statements Continued:
 
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except share and per share data) (Unaudited)
 
   
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
   
2013
  
2012
  
2013
  
2012
 
Interest income:
            
    Loans, including loan fees
 $9,828  $6,530  $16,609  $12,986 
    Investment securities:
                
      Taxable
  278   157   405   319 
      Non-taxable
  187   205   360   419 
   Other interest income
  65   51   145   123 
         Total interest income
  10,358   6,943   17,519   13,847 
Interest expense:
                
    Money market and NOW accounts
  463   398   977   804 
    Savings and time deposits
  562   747   1,049   1,713 
    Short term borrowings
  6   1   7   2 
    Junior subordinated debentures
  165   125   289   250 
    Notes payable
  344   338   627   675 
         Total interest expense
  1,540   1,609   2,949   3,444 
                Net interest income
  8,818   5,334   14,570   10,403 
Provision for loan losses
  975   1,125   1,950   2,375 
         Net interest income after provision for loan losses
  7,843   4,209   12,620   8,028 
Noninterest income:
                
    Service charges on deposit accounts
  470   280   754   567 
    Trust services fee income
  1,074   724   1,876   1,454 
    Mortgage income
  714   671   1,586   1,408 
    Brokerage fee income
  115   81   217   165 
    Gain on sale of assets, net
  45   237   49   383 
    Bank owned life insurance
  212   183   381   336 
    Rent income
  274   240   524   480 
    Investment advisory fees
  76   85   162   171 
    Bargain purchase gain
  10,435   -   10,435   - 
    Other
  351   176   538   337 
         Total noninterest income
  13,766   2,677   16,522   5,301 
Noninterest expense:
                
    Salaries and employee benefits
  5,555   3,393   9,114   6,666 
    Occupancy, equipment and office
  1,466   1,102   2,570   2,241 
    Business development and marketing
  473   352   898   697 
    Data processing
  572   410   995   812 
  FDIC assessments
  130   138   240   274 
    Core deposit intangible amortization
  286   168   434   336 
    Other
  1,104   446   1,675   768 
         Total noninterest expense
  9,586   6,009   15,926   11,794 
                  
         Income before income tax expense
  12,023   877   13,216   1,535 
Income tax expense
  547   232   966   375 
         Net income
  11,476   645   12,250   1,160 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
  19   13   38   26 
         Net income attributable to Nicolet Bankshares, Inc.
  11,457   632   12,212   1,134 
Less:  Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion
  305   305   610   610 
         Net income available to common shareholders
 $11,152  $327  $11,602  $524 
                  
Basic earnings per common share
 $2.79  $0.09  $3.12  $0.16 
Diluted earnings per common share
 $2.78  $0.09  $3.11  $0.16 
 
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
                
    Basic
  3,999,732   3,452,209   3,717,627   3,466,282 
    Diluted
  4,008,426   3,463,137   3,728,599   3,481,791 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
4
 

 

 
ITEM 1.  Financial Statements Continued:
 
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
 
  
Three Months Ended
  Six Months Ended 
  
June 30,
  
June 30,
 
   
2013
  
2012
  
2013
  
2012
 
Net income
 $11,476  $645  $12,250  $1,160 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
                
Securities available for sale:
                
Net unrealized holding gains/(losses) arising during the period
  (1,645)  119   (1,130)  633 
Less: reclassification adjustment for net (gains)/losses realized in net income
  239   (232)  239   (440)
Net unrealized gains/losses on securities before tax expense
  (1,406)  (113)  (891)  193 
Income tax expense/(benefit)
  549   39   348   (65)
Total other comprehensive income
  (857)  (74)  (543)  128 
Comprehensive income
 $10,619  $571  $11,707  $1,288 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
5
 

 

 
ITEM 1.  Financial Statements Continued:
 
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
                            
   
Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
       
   
Preferred
Equity
  
Common
Stock
  
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  
Retained
Earnings
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
  
 
 
Noncontrolling
Interest
  
 
 
 
Total
 
Balance, December 31, 2012
 $24,400  $34  $36,243  $14,973  $1,683  $45  $77,378 
Comprehensive income
  -   -   -   12,212   (543)  38   11,707 
Stock compensation expense
  -   -   342   -   -   -   342 
Exercise of stock options
  -   -   206   -   -   -   206 
Purchase and retirement of common stock
  -   -   (63)  -   -   -   (63)
Common stock issued, net of capitalized issuance costs of $401
  -   8   12,419   -   -   -   12,427 
Preferred stock dividends
  -   -   -   (610)  -   -   (610)
Distribution from noncontrolling interest
  -   -   -   -   -   (60)  (60)
Balance, June 30, 2013
 $24,400  $42  $49,147  $26,575  $1,140  $23  $101,327 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
6
 

 

 
ITEM 1.  Financial Statements Continued:
 
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
 
         
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2013
  
2012
 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
      
Net income
 $12,250  $1,160 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
        
     Depreciation, amortization, and accretion
  1,985   1,233 
     Provision for loan losses
  1,950   2,375 
     Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
  (381)  (336)
     Stock compensation expense
  342   241 
     Gain on sale of assets, net
  (49)  (383)
     Gain on sale of loans held for sale, net
  (1,586)  (1,408)
     Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale
  95,965   90,266 
     Origination of loans held for sale
  (90,198)  (81,727)
     Bargain purchase gain
  (10,435)  - 
     Net change in:
        
          Accrued interest receivable and other assets
  366   256 
  Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
  1,354   2,489 
          Net cash provided by operating activities
  11,563   14,166 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
        
Net decrease in certificates of deposit in other banks
  -   248 
Net increase in loans
  (19,689)  (47,901)
Purchases of securities available for sale
  (8,711)  (11,830)
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale
  43,945   5,415 
Proceeds from calls and maturities of securities available for sale
  8,089   3,692 
Purchase of other investments
  (8)  (2)
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
  -   (3,750)
Purchase of premises and equipment
  (1,246)  (1,632)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate and other assets
  993   877 
Net cash received in business combination
  13,898   - 
          Net cash provided (used) by investing activities
  37,271   (54,883)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
        
Net decrease in deposits
  (54,152)  (11,641)
Net change in short term borrowings
  3,091   (2,451)
Proceeds from notes payable
  -   3,800 
Repayments of notes payable
  (45,809)  (108)
Purchase of common stock
  (63)  (814)
Stock issuance costs
  (401)  - 
Issuance of common stock
  3,107   - 
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options
  206   - 
Noncontrolling interest in joint venture
  (60)  (100)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock
  (610)  (610)
          Net cash used by financing activities
  (94,691)  (11,924)
        Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
  (45,857)  (52,641)
Cash and cash equivalents:
        
Beginning
 $82,003  $92,129 
Ending
 $36,146  $39,488 
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
        
 Cash paid for interest
 $2,241  $3,477 
 Cash paid for taxes
  1,018   726 
 Transfer of loans to other real estate owned
  2,116   1,169 
 Acquisition:
        
   Fair value of assets acquired
  435,692   - 
   Fair value of liabilities assumed
  415,067   - 
   Net assets acquired
  20,625   - 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
        
 
7
 

 

 
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
 
General
 
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, consolidated balance sheets, and statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the periods presented, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.  All material intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated.  The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
 
These interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) have been omitted or abbreviated.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes for the year ended December 31, 2012 which is contained in the Joint Proxy Statement-Prospectus dated March 26, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) on March 27, 2013.
 
Preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying disclosures. These estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other items, the allowance for loan losses, useful lives for depreciation and amortization, fair value of financial instruments, deferred tax assets, uncertain income tax positions and contingencies.  Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change for the Company include the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the assessment of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and therefore are critical accounting policies.  Management does not anticipate any material changes to estimates in the near term. Factors that may cause sensitivity to the aforementioned estimates include but are not limited to:  external market factors such as market interest rates and employment rates, changes to operating policies and procedures, and changes in applicable banking regulations. Actual results may ultimately differ from estimates, although management does not generally believe such differences would materially affect the consolidated financial statements in any individual reporting period presented.
 
The following information related to critical accounting policies has been expanded within this document to include the discussion on policies which were impacted by the acquisition.
 
Business Combinations and Method of Accounting for Loans Acquired
 
The Company accounts for its acquisitions under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the acquisition method of accounting. All identifiable assets and liabilities acquired, including loans, are recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses related to the acquired loans is recorded on the acquisition date because the fair value of the loans acquired incorporates assumptions regarding credit risk. Loans acquired are recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The fair value estimates associated with the loans include estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of expected principal, interest and other cash flows.
 
Acquired loans are recorded at their estimated fair value at the acquisition date, and are initially classified as either purchase credit impaired (“PCI”) loans (i.e. loans that reflect credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at acquisition that the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payments) or purchased non-impaired loans. PCI loans are accounted for under the accounting guidance for loans and debt securities acquired with deteriorated credit quality, found in FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Receivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, formerly American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) Statement of Position (SOP) 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer.  The Company estimates the amount and timing of expected principal, interest and other cash flows for each loan or pool of loans meeting the criteria above, and determines the excess of the loan’s scheduled contractual
 
principal and contractual interest payments over all cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition as an amount that should not be accreted.   These credit discounts (“nonaccretable marks”) are included in the determination of initial fair value for acquired loans; therefore, an allowance for loan losses is not recorded at the acquisition date. Differences between the estimated fair values and expected cash flows of acquired loans at the acquisition date that are not credit-based (“accretable marks”) are subsequently accreted to interest income over the estimated life of the loans using a method that approximates a level yield method if the timing and amount of the future cash flows is reasonably estimable.
 
8
 

 

 
Subsequent to the acquisition date for PCI loans, increases in cash flows over those expected at the acquisition date are recognized prospectively as interest income. Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date are recognized through the provision for loan losses.
 
Loans acquired through business combinations that do not meet the specific criteria of FASB ASC Topic 310-30, but for which a discount is attributable at least in part to credit quality, are also accounted for under this guidance. All fair value discounts on acquired loans were deemed to be credit related at acquisition in the Mid-Wisconsin merger.  The nonaccretable difference represents cash flows not expected to be collected. Subsequently, based on re-evaluation of cash flows and facts available, some nonaccretable differences may be reclassified to accretable.
 
Allowance for loan losses
 
The allowance for loan and lease losses related to PCI loans is based on an analysis that is performed each period to estimate the expected cash flows for each loan deemed PCI. To the extent that the expected cash flows of a PCI loan have decreased since the acquisition date, the Company establishes or increases the allowance for loan losses.
 
For acquired loans that are not deemed credit impaired at acquisition, credit discounts representing the principal losses expected over the life of the loan are a component of the initial fair value. Subsequent to the purchase date, the methods utilized to estimate the required allowance for loan losses for these loans is similar to originated loans.  The remaining differences between the purchase price and the unpaid principal balance at the date of acquisition are recorded in interest income over the economic life of the loans.
 
Income Taxes
 
Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. These temporary differences are multiplied by the enacted income tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes become payable or receivable. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced, if necessary, by the amount of such benefits that are not expected to be realized based on available evidence.  At acquisition, deferred taxes were evaluated in respect to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities (including the acquired net operating losses), and a net deferred tax asset was recorded.  Certain limitations within the provisions of the tax code are placed on the amount of net operating losses which can be utilized as part of acquisition accounting rules and were incorporated into the calculation of the deferred tax asset.  In addition, a portion of the fair market value discounts on PCI loans which resolve in the first twelve months after the acquisition may be disallowed under provisions of the tax code.
 
9
 

 

 
Note 2 – Acquisition
 
On April 26, 2013, the Company consummated its acquisition of Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. (“Mid-Wisconsin”), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among the Company and Mid-Wisconsin dated November 28, 2012, as amended January 17, 2013 (the “Merger Agreement”), whereby Mid-Wisconsin was merged with and into the Company, and Mid-Wisconsin Bank, Mid-Wisconsin’s wholly owned commercial bank subsidiary serving central Wisconsin, was merged with and into Nicolet National Bank.  The system integration was completed, and the eleven branches of Mid-Wisconsin opened on April 29, 2013 as Nicolet National Bank branches, doubling the Bank’s footprint to 22 branch locations.
 
The purpose of the merger was for strategic reasons beneficial to the Company. The acquisition is consistent with its growth plans to build a community bank of sufficient size to flourish in various economic environments, serve its expanded customer base with a wide variety of products and services, and effectively and efficiently meet growing regulatory compliance and capital requirements.  The Company believes it is well-positioned to achieve stronger financial performance and enhance shareholder value through synergies of the combined operations.
 
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the outstanding shares of Mid-Wisconsin common stock, other than dissenting shares as defined in the merger agreement, were converted into the right to receive 0.3727 shares of Company common stock (and in lieu of any fractional share of Company common stock, $16.50 in cash) per share of Mid-Wisconsin common stock or, for record holders of 200 or fewer shares of Mid-Wisconsin common stock, $6.15 in cash per share of Mid-Wisconsin common stock.  As a result, the total value of the consideration to Mid-Wisconsin shareholders was $10.2 million, consisting of $0.5 million in cash and 589,159 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company’s common stock was valued at $16.50 per share, which was the value assigned in the merger agreement and considered to be the fair value of the stock on the date of the acquisition.  Concurrently with the merger, the Company also closed a private placement of 174,016 shares of its common stock at an offering price of $16.50 per share, for an aggregate of $2.9 million in proceeds.    Approximately $401,000 in direct stock issuance costs for the merger and private placement were incurred and charged against additional paid in capital.
 
The Company accounted for the transaction under the acquisition method of accounting, and thus, the financial position and results of operations of Mid-Wisconsin prior to the consummation date were not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.  The accounting required assets purchased and liabilities assumed to be recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The Company determined the fair value of core deposit intangibles, securities, premises and equipment, loans, OREO, deposits, debt and deferred taxes with the assistance of third party valuations, appraisals, and third party advisors.  The estimated fair values will be subject to refinement as additional information relative to the closing date fair values becomes available through the measurement period of approximately one year from consummation.
 
The fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed on April 26, 2013 was as follows:
               
 
(in millions)
 
As recorded by
Mid-Wisconsin
  
Fair Value
Adjustments
   
As recorded
by Nicolet
 
Cash, cash equivalents and securities available for sale
 $134  $(1)  $133 
Loans,net
  284   (12)   272 
Other real estate owned
  5   (3)   2 
Core deposit intangible
  -   4    4 
Premises, equipment, and other assets
  17   7 (1)  24 
Total assets acquired
 $440  $(5)  $435 
               
Deposits
 $345  $1   $346 
Junior subordinated debentures, borrowings and other liabilities
  72   (3)(2)  69 
Total liabilities acquired
 $417  $(2)  $415 
               
Excess of assets acquired over liabilities acquired
 $23  $(3)  $20 
Less: purchase price
          $10 
Bargain purchase gain
          $10 
 
(1) Includes premises and equipment adjustment of $2 million and deferred tax asset of $5 million.
(2) Includes borrowings adjustment increase of $2 million and subordinated debentures adjustment decrease of $5 million.
 
10
 

 

 
The following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations for three months ended and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, as if the acquisition had occurred January 1 of each year. The Company expects to achieve further operating cost savings and other business synergies as a result of the acquisition which are not reflected in the pro forma amounts.  These unaudited pro forma results are presented for illustrative purposes and are not intended to represent or be indicative of the actual results of operations of the combined company that would have been achieved had the acquisition occurred at the beginning of each period presented, nor are they intended to represent or be indicative of future results of operations.
                 
   
Three Months Ended
  
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30, 2013
  
June 30, 2012
  
June 30, 2013
  
June 30, 2012
 
(in thousands)
            
Total revenues, net of interest expense
 $23,709  $12,581  $36,681  $24,911 
Net income
  10,599   (539)  11,247   (240)
 
11
 

 

 
Note 3 – Earnings per Common Share
 
Basic earnings per common share are calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock awards (outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock), if any.  Presented below are the calculations for basic and diluted earnings per common share.
                  
   
Three Months Ended June 30,
  
 Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2013
  
2012
  
2013
  
2012
 
(In thousands except per share data)
            
Net income, net of noncontrolling interest
 $11,457  $632  $12,212  $1,134 
Less: preferred stock dividends
  305   305   610   610 
Net income available to common shareholders
 $11,152  $327  $11,602  $524 
Weighted average common shares outstanding
  4,000   3,452   3,718   3,466 
Effect of dilutive stock instruments
  8   11   11   16 
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
  4,008   3,463   3,729   3,482 
Basic earnings per common share*
 $2.79  $0.09  $3.12  $0.16 
Diluted earnings per common share*
 $2.78  $0.09  $3.11  $0.16 
 
*Cumulative quarterly per share performance may not equal annual per share totals due to the effects of the amount and timing of capital increases. When computing earnings per share for an interim period, the denominator is based on the weighted-average shares outstanding during the interim period, and not on an annualized weighted-average basis.  Accordingly, the sum of the quarters’ earnings per share data will not necessarily equal the year to date earnings per share data.
 
Note 4 – Stock-based compensation
 
Activity of the Company’s Stock Incentive Plans is summarized in the following tables:
                  
 
Stock Options
 
 
Weighted-
Average Fair
Value of Options
Granted
  
 
Option Shares
Outstanding
  
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
  
 
 
Exercisable
Shares
 
Balance – December 31, 2011
     702,907  $17.78   533,074 
  Granted
 $4.87   184,625   16.50     
  Exercise of stock options
      (25,750)  12.50     
  Forfeited
      (36,250)  16.84     
Balance – December 31, 2012
      825,532   17.70   548,623 
  Granted
  -   -   -     
  Exercise of stock options
      (15,625)  13.20     
  Forfeited
      (3,000)  12.50     
Balance – June 30, 2013
      806,907  $17.80   567,985 
 
Options outstanding at June 30, 2013 are exercisable at option prices ranging from $12.50 to $26.00.  There are 363,583 options outstanding in the range from $12.50 - $17.00, 396,824 options outstanding in the range from $17.01 - $22.00, and 46,500 options outstanding in the range from $22.01 - $26.00.  The exercisable options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of approximately 5 years as of June 30, 2013.
 
Intrinsic value represents the amount by which the fair market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the stock options.  The total intrinsic value of options exercised in the first six months of 2013, and full year of  2012 was approximately $48,000, and $103,000, respectively. The weighted average exercise price of stock options exercisable at June 30, 2013 was $18.22.
 
12
 

 

 
Note 4 – Stock-based compensation, continued
        
Restricted Stock
 
 
Weighted-
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
  
Restricted
Shares
Outstanding
 
Balance – December 31, 2011
 $-   - 
   Granted
  16.50   54,725 
   Vested
  -   - 
   Forfeited
  16.50   (250)
Balance – December 31, 2012
  16.50   54,475 
   Granted
  16.50   10,606 
   Vested *
  16.50   (12,958)
   Forfeited
  -   - 
Balance – June 30, 2013
 $16.50   52,123 
 
*The terms of the restricted stock agreements permit the surrender of shares to the Company upon vesting in order to satisfy applicable tax withholding requirements at the minimum statuatory withholding rate, and 3,812 shares were surrendered accordingly during the six months ended June 30, 2013.
 
The Company recognized approximately $342,000 and $241,000 of stock-based employee compensation expense during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, associated with its stock equity awards.  As of June 30, 2013, there was approximately $1.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to equity award grants.  The cost is expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining vesting period of approximately five years.
 
Note 5- Securities Available for Sale
 
Amortized costs and fair values of securities available for sale are summarized as follows:
                 
   
June 30, 2013
 
(in thousands)
 
Amortized Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross Unrealized Losses
  
Fair Value
 
U.S. government sponsored enterprises
 $1,000  $1  $-  $1,001 
State, county and municipals
  51,741   1,159   560   52,340 
Mortgage-backed securities
  73,581   594   912   73,263 
Corporate debt securities
  220   -   -   220 
Equity securities
  1,576   1,588   -   3,164 
   $128,118  $3,342  $1,472  $129,988 
                  
   
December 31, 2012
 
(in thousands)
 
Amortized Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross Unrealized Losses
  
Fair Values
 
State, county and municipals
 $31,642  $1,079  $34  $32,687 
Mortgage-backed securities
  19,876   803   11   20,668 
Equity securities
  1,624   922   -   2,546 
   $53,142  $2,804  $45  $55,901 
 
13
 

 

 
Note 5- Securities Available for Sale, continued
 
The following table represents gross unrealized losses and the related fair value of investment securities available for sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
                        
   
June 30, 2013
 
   
Less than 12 months
  
12 months or more
  
Total
 
(in thousands)
 
Fair Value
  
Unrealized Losses
  
Fair Value
  
Unrealized Losses
  
Fair Value
  
Unrealized Losses
 
State, county and municipals
 $20,356  $560  $-  $-  $20,356  $560 
Mortgage-backed securities
  47,157   912   -   -   47,157   912 
   $67,513  $1,472  $-  $-  $67,513  $1,472 
     
   
December 31, 2012
 
   
Less than 12 months
  
12 months or more
  
Total
 
(in thousands)
 
Fair Value
  
Unrealized Losses
  
Fair Value
  
Unrealized Losses
  
Fair Value
  
Unrealized Losses
 
State, county and municipals
 $4,250  $34  $-  $-  $4,250  $34 
Mortgage-backed securities
  3,507   11   -   -   3,507   11 
   $7,757  $45  $-  $-  $7,757  $45 
 
As of June 30, 2013 the Company does not consider securities with unrealized losses to be other-than-temporarily impaired.  The unrealized losses in each category have occurred as a result of changes in interest rates, market spreads and market conditions subsequent to purchase. The Company has the ability and intent to hold its securities to maturity.  There were no other-than-temporary impairments charged to earnings during the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2013 or 2012.
 
The amortized cost and fair values of securities available for sale at June 30, 2013 by contractual maturity are shown below.  Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.  Fair values of securities are estimated based on financial models or prices paid for the same or similar securities.  It is possible interest rates could change considerably, resulting in a material change in estimated fair value.
         
   
June 30, 2013
 
(in thousands)
 
Amortized Cost
  
Fair Value
 
Due in less than one year
 $5,263  $5,320 
Due in one year through five years
  38,268   39,124 
Due after five years through ten years
  8,835   8,522 
Due after ten years
  595   595 
    52,961   53,561 
Mortgage-backed securities
  73,581   73,263 
Equity securities
  1,576   3,164 
   Securities available for sale
 $128,118  $129,988 
 
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale during the first six months of 2013 and 2012 were approximately $43.9 million and $5.4 million respectively.  Net gains of approximately $239,000 and $440,000 were realized on sales of securities during the first six months of 2013 and 2012.
 
14
 

 

 
Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality
 
The loan composition as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is summarized as follows.
             
   
2013
     
2012
    
(in thousands)
 
Amount
  
% of
Total
  
Amount
  
% of
Total
 
Commercial & industrial
 $245,856   29.3% $197,301   35.7%
Agricultural production
  13,114   1.6   215   0.1 
Owner-occupied commercial real estate (“CRE”)
  181,101   21.5   106,888   19.3 
Agricultural real estate
  38,983   4.6   11,354   2.1 
CRE investment
  117,264   14.0   76,618   13.9 
Construction & land development
  37,754   4.5   21,791   3.9 
Residential construction
  10,288   1.2   7,957   1.4 
Residential first mortgage
  141,255   16.8   85,588   15.5 
Residential junior mortgage
  48,929   5.8   39,352   7.1 
Retail & other
  6,002   0.7   5,537   1.0 
    Loans
  840,546   100.0%  552,601   100.0%
Less allowance for loan losses
  7,658       7,120     
    Loans, net
 $832,888      $545,481     
Allowance for loan losses to loans
  0.91%      1.29%    
 
Practically, all of the Company’s loans, commitments, and standby letters of credit have been granted to customers in the Company’s market area.  Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, the credit risk in the loan portfolio is largely influenced by general economic conditions and trends of the counties and markets in which the debtors operate, and the resulting impact on the operations of borrowers or on the value of underlying collateral, if any.
 
The allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) represents management’s estimate of probable and inherent credit losses in the Company’s loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. In general, estimating the amount of the ALLL is a function of a number of factors, including but not limited to changes in the loan portfolio, net charge-offs, trends in past due and impaired loans, and the level of potential problem loans, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.  To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provisions for loan losses could be required that could adversely affect our earnings or financial position in future periods. Allocations to the ALLL may be made for specific loans but the entire ALLL is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off or for which an actual loss is realized.
 
The allocation methodology used by the Company includes specific allocations for impaired loans evaluated individually for impairment based on collateral values and for the remaining loan portfolio collectively evaluated for impairment primarily based on historical loss rates and other qualitative factors.  Loan charge-offs and recoveries are based on actual amounts charged-off or recovered by loan category.  Management allocates the ALLL by pools of risk within each loan portfolio.  Due to the short period of time since the acquisition and consistent with acquisition accounting rules, no ALLL has been recorded on acquired loans at June 30, 2013.
 
15
 

 

 
Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued
 
The following table presents the balance and activity in the ALLL by portfolio segment and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment based on the impairment method for the periods indicated:
 
   
Six Months ended June 30, 2013
 
(in thousands)
ALLL:
 
Commercial
& industrial
  
Agricultural production
  
Owner- occupied
CRE
  
 
Agricultural real estate
  
CRE investment
  
Construction & land development
  
Residential construction
  
Residential first mortgage
  
Residential junior mortgage
  
Retail &
other
  
 
Total
 
Beginning balance
 $1,969  $-  $1,069  $-  $337  $2,580  $137  $685  $312  $31  $7,120 
Provision
  170   5   259   12   485   802   36   128   57   (4)  1,950 
Charge-offs
  (475)  -   (113)  -   (639)  (36)  -   (86)  (83)  (11)  (1,443)
Recoveries
  21   -   2   -   -   -   -   6   1   1   31 
Ending balance
 $1,685  $5  $1,217  $12  $183  $3,346  $173  $733  $287  $17  $7,658 
As percent of ALLL
  22.0%  0.1%  15.9%  0.2%  2.4%  43.7%  2.3%  9.5%  3.7%  0.2%  100.0%
                                              
ALLL: Individually evaluated
 $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
ALLL: PCI loans
  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Collectively evaluated    
  1,685   5   1,217   12   183   3,346   173   733   287   17   7,658 
Ending balance
 $1,685  $5  $1,217  $12  $183  $3,346  $173  $733  $287  $17  $7,658 
                                              
Loans:
                                            
Individually evaluated
 $3  $-  $1,800  $-  $688  $-  $-  $1,099  $-  $137  $3,727 
PCI loans
  1   22   1,746   611   4,858   790   -   2,295   257   -   10,580 
Collectively evaluated
  245,852   13,092   177,555   38,372   111,718   36,964   10,288   137,861   48,672   5,865   826,239 
Total loans
 $245,856  $13,114  $181,101  $38,983  $117,264  $37,754  $10,288  $141,255  $48,929  $6,002  $840,546 
                                              
Less ALLL
 $1,685  $5  $1,217  $12  $183  $3,346  $173  $733  $287  $17  $7,658 
Net loans
 $244,171  $13,109  $179,884  $38,971  $117,081  $34,408  $10,115  $140,522  $48,642  $5,985  $832,888 
 
  
Six Months ended June 30, 2012
 
(in thousands)
ALLL:
 
Commercial
& industrial
  
Agricultural production
  
Owner- occupied
CRE
  
Agricultural real estate
  
CRE investment
  
Construction & land development
  
Residential construction
  
Residential first mortgage
  
Residential junior mortgage
  
Retail &
other
  
Total
 
Beginning balance
 $1,965  $-  $347  $-  $393  $2,035  $311  $405  $419  $24  $5,899 
Provision
  729   -   1,096   127   24   (67)  163   171   96   36   2,375 
Charge-offs
  (77)  -   (899)  (127)  (155)  (307)  (395)  (168)  (118)  (38)  (2,284)
Recoveries
  30   -   8   -   -   5   -   7   4   1   55 
Ending balance
 $2,647  $-  $552  $-  $262  $1,666  $79  $415  $401  $23  $6,045 
As percent of ALLL
  43.8%  0.0%  9.1%  0.0%  4.3%  27.6%  1.3%  6.9%  6.6%  0.4%  100.0%
                                              
ALLL: Individually evaluated
 $-  $-  $165  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $165 
Collectively evaluated
  2,647   -   387   -   262   1,666   79   415   401   23   5,880 
Ending balance
 $2,647  $-  $552  $-  $262  $1,666  $79  $415  $401  $23  $6,045 
                                              
Loans:
                                            
Individually evaluated
 $4,383  $-  $60  $34  $544  $8,527  $799  $797  $36  $151  $15,331 
Collectively evaluated
  194,645   183   115,110   1,247   62,313   16,085   5,162   62,359   38,046   6,511   501,661 
Total loans
 $199,028  $183  $115,170  $1,281  $62,857  $24,612  $5,961  $63,156  $38,082  $6,662  $516,992 
                                              
Less ALLL
 $2,647  $0  $552  $0  $262  $1,666  $79  $415  $401  $23  $6,045 
Net loans
 $196,381  $183  $114,618  $1,281  $62,595  $2,946  $5,882  $62,741  $37,681  $6,639  $510,947 
 
16
 

 

 
Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when management has determined collection of the interest on a loan is doubtful or when a loan is contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments.  When loans are placed on nonaccrual status or charged-off, all current year unpaid accrued interest is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is subsequently accounted for on the cash basis until qualifying for return to accrual status.  If collectability of the principal is in doubt, payments received are applied to loan principal.  Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.   Management considers a loan to be impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest payments due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement.

The following table presents nonaccrual loans by portfolio segment as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.  The June 30, 2013 nonaccrual loans of $14.3 million include $10.6 million of loans acquired at fair value in the Mid-Wisconsin merger:

(in thousands)
 
2013
  
% to Total
  
2012
  
% to Total
 
Commercial & industrial
 $4   -% $784   11.2%
Agricultural production
  22   0.2   -   - 
Owner-occupied CRE
  3,546   24.8   1,960   27.9 
Agricultural real estate
  611   4.3   -   - 
CRE investment
  5,546   38.8   -   - 
Construction & land development
  790   5.5   2,560   36.4 
Residential construction
  -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage
  3,394   23.7   1,580   22.5 
Residential junior mortgage
  257   1.8   -   - 
Retail & other
  137   0.9   142   2.0 
    Nonaccrual loans
 $14,307   100.0% $7,026   100.0%

The following tables present past due loans by portfolio segment:
 
   
June 30, 2013
 
(in thousands)
 
30-89 Days Past Due (accruing)
  
90 Days & Over or non-accrual
  
Current
  
Total
 
Commercial & industrial
 $23  $4  $245,829  $245,856 
Agricultural production
  7   22   13,085   13,114 
Owner-occupied CRE
  89   3,546   177,466   181,101 
Agricultural real estate
  87   611   38,285   38,983 
CRE investment
  634   5,546   111,084   117,264 
Construction & land development
  387   790   36,577   37,754 
Residential construction
  -   -   10,288   10,288 
Residential first mortgage
  661   3,394   137,200   141,255 
Residential junior mortgage
  69   257   48,603   48,929 
Retail & other
  8   137   5,857   6,002 
Total loans
 $1,965  $14,307  $824,274  $840,546 
As a percent of total loans
  0.2%  1.7%  98.1%  100.0%
 
   
December 31, 2012
 
(in thousands)
 
30-89 Days Past Due (accruing)
  
90 Days &
Over or
nonaccrual
  
Current
  
Total
 
Commercial & industrial
 $-  $784  $196,517  $197,301 
Agricultural production
  -   -   215   215 
Owner-occupied CRE
  -   1,960   104,928   106,888 
Agricultural real estate
  -   -   11,354   11,354 
CRE investment
  -   -   76,618   76,618 
Construction & land development
  -   2,560   19,231   21,791 
Residential construction
  -   -   7,957   7,957 
Residential first mortgage
  -   1,580   84,008   85,588 
Residential junior mortgage
  -   -   39,352   39,352 
Retail & other
  6   142   5,389   5,537 
Total loans
 $6  $7,026  $545,569  $552,601 
As a percent of total loans
  0.0%  1.3%  98.7%  100.0%
 
17
 

 


Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

A description of the loan risk categories used by the Company follows:

1-4  Pass:  Credits exhibit adequate cash flows, appropriate management and financial ratios within industry norms and/or are supported by sufficient collateral.  Some credits in these rating categories may require a need for monitoring but elements of concern are not severe enough to warrant an elevated rating.

5  Watch:  Credits with this rating are adequately secured and performing but are being monitored due to the presence of various short term weaknesses which may include unexpected, short term adverse financial performance, managerial problems, potential impact of a decline in the entire industry or local economy and delinquency issues.  Loans to individuals or loans supported by guarantors with marginal net worth or collateral may be included in this rating category.

6  Special Mention:  Credits with this rating have potential weaknesses that, without the Company’s attention and correction may result in deterioration of repayment prospects.  These assets are considered Criticized Assets.  Potential weaknesses may include adverse financial trends for the borrower or industry, repeated lack of compliance with Company requests, increasing debt to worth, serious management conditions and decreasing cash flow.

7  Substandard:  Assets with this rating are characterized by the distinct possibility the Company will sustain some loss if deficiencies are not corrected.  All foreclosures, liquidations, and non-accrual loans are considered to be categorized in this rating, regardless of collateral sufficiency.

8  Doubtful:   Assets with this rating exhibit all the weaknesses as one rated Substandard with the added characteristic that such weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable.

9  Loss:  Assets in this category are considered uncollectible.  Pursuing any recovery or salvage value is impractical but does not preclude partial recovery in the future.
 
The following tables present loans by loan grade:

   
June 30, 2013
 
(in thousands)
 
Grades 1- 4
  
Grade 5
  
Grade 6
  
Grade 7
  
Grade 8
  
Grade 9
  
Total
 
Commercial & industrial
 $231,391  $12,319  $700  $1,446  $-  $-  $245,856 
Agricultural production
  12,436   291   279   108   -   -   13,114 
Owner-occupied CRE
  163,633   6,545   4,607   6,316   -   -   181,101 
Agricultural real estate
  25,514   10,289   1,827   1,353   -   -   38,983 
CRE investment
  97,074   11,283   317   8,590   -   -   117,264 
Construction & land development
  28,061   2,416   859   6,418   -   -   37,754 
Residential construction
  8,906   -   -   1,382   -   -   10,288 
Residential first mortgage
  134,511   2,299   -   4,445   -   -   141,255 
Residential junior mortgage
  48,366   287   -   276   -   -   48,929 
Retail & other
  5,854   -   -   148   -   -   6,002 
Total loans
 $755,746  $45,729  $8,589  $30,482  $-  $-  $840,546 
Percent of total
  89.9%  5.5%  1.0%  3.6%  -   -   100%

   
December 31, 2012
 
(in thousands)
 
Grades 1- 4
  
Grade 5
  
Grade 6
  
Grade 7
  
Grade 8
  
Grade 9
  
Total
 
Commercial & industrial
 $192,426  $1,969  $604  $2,517  $-  $-  $197,516 
Owner-occupied CRE
  96,313   16,502   1,832   3,595   -   -   118,242 
CRE investment
  66,358   8,545   -   1,715   -   -   76,618 
Construction & land development
  12,351   855   877   7,708   -   -   21,791 
Residential construction
  6,775   -   -   1,182   -   -   7,957 
Residential first mortgage
  82,914   1,094   -   1,580   -   -   85,588 
Residential junior mortgage
  38,582   199   249   322   -   -   39,352 
Retail & other
  5,537   -   -   -   -   -   5,537 
Total loans
 $501,256  $29,164  $3,562  $18,619  $-  $-  $552,601 
Percent of total
  90.7%  5.3%  0.6%  3.4%  -   -   100%

18
 

 

 
Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

In determining the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses, management includes allocations for specifically identified impaired loans and loss factor allocations for all remaining loans, with a component primarily based on historical loss rates and another component primarily based on other qualitative factors.  Impaired loans are individually assessed and are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Loans that are determined not to be impaired are collectively evaluated for impairment, stratified by type and allocated loss ranges based on the Company’s actual historical loss ratios for each strata, and adjustments are also provided for certain current environmental and qualitative factors.  An internal loan review function rates loans using a grading system based on nine different categories. Loans with grades of seven or higher (“classified loans”) represent loans with a greater risk of loss and may be assigned allocations for loss based on specific review of the weaknesses observed in the individual credits if classified as impaired.  Classified loans are constantly monitored by the loan review function to ensure early identification of any deterioration.
 
19
 

 


Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued

The following tables present impaired loans as of the dates indicated:

(in thousands)
 
Recorded Investment
  
Unpaid Principal
Balance
  
Related Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest Income
Recognized
 
June 30, 2013
            
With no related allowance:
               
Commercial & industrial
 $4  $5  $-  $9  $- 
Agricultural production
  22   62   -   36   4 
Owner-occupied CRE
  3,546   4,993   -   3,673   72 
Agricultural real estate
  611   619   -   524   15 
CRE investment
  5,546   7,967   -   5,558   255 
Construction & land development
  790   1,100   -   619   49 
Residential construction
  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage
  3,394   4,313   -   3,206   157 
Residential junior mortgage
  257   275   -   263   15 
Retail & Other
  137   147   -   149   4 
With a related allowance:
          -         
Commercial & industrial
 $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Agricultural production
  -   -   -   -   - 
Owner-occupied CRE
  -   -   -   -   - 
Agricultural real estate
  -   -   -   -   - 
CRE investment
  -   -   -   -   - 
Construction & land
  development
  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential construction
  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage
  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential junior mortgage
  -   -   -   -   - 
Retail & Other
  -   -   -   -   - 
Total:
                    
Commercial & industrial
 $4  $5  $-  $9  $- 
Agricultural production
  22   62   -   36   4 
Owner-occupied CRE
  3,546   4,993   -   3,673   72 
Agricultural real estate
  611   619   -   524   15 
CRE investment
  5,546   7,967   -   5,558   255 
Construction & land development
  790   1,100   -   619   49 
Residential construction
  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage
  3,394   4,313   -   3,206   157 
Residential junior mortgage
  257   275   -   263   15 
Retail & Other
  137   147   -   149   4 
                     Total
 $14,307  $19,481  $-  $14,037  $571 

20
 

 


Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality, continued
 
(in thousands)
 
Recorded Investment
  
Unpaid Principal
Balance
  
Related Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest Income Recognized
 
December 31, 2012
            
With no related allowance:
               
Commercial & industrial
 $784  $1,287  $-  $3,015  $265 
Owner-occupied CRE
  1,960   1,960   -   636   95 
CRE investment
  -   -   -   439   - 
Construction & land development
  2,560   2,560   -   6,333   - 
Residential construction
  -   -   -   620   - 
Residential first mortgage
  1,580   1,696   -   1,298   88 
Residential junior mortgage
  -   -   -   58   - 
Retail & Other
  142   150   -   120   7 
With a related allowance:
          -         
Commercial & industrial
 $-  $-  $-  $177  $- 
Owner-occupied CRE
  -   -   -   162   - 
CRE investment
  -   -   -   -   - 
Construction & land development.
  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential construction
  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential first mortgage
  -   -   -   -   - 
Residential junior mortgage
  -   -   -   -   - 
Retail & other
  -   -   -   -   - 
Total:
                    
Commercial & industrial
 $784  $1,287  $-  $3,192  $265 
Owner-occupied CRE
  1,960   1,960   -   798   95 
CRE investment
  -   -   -   439   - 
Construction & land development
  2,560   2,560   -   6,333   - 
Residential construction
  -   -   -   620   - 
Residential first mortgage
  1,580   1,696   -   1,298   88 
Residential junior mortgage
  -   -   -   58   - 
Retail & other
  142   150   -   120   7 
                     Total
 $7,026  $7,653  $-  $12,858  $455 
 
Troubled Debt Restructurings
 
At June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, there were no loans classified or reported as troubled debt restructurings.  There were no loans which were modified and classified as trouble debt restructurings at June 30, 2013.  There were no loans which were classified as troubled debt restructurings during the previous twelve months that subsequently defaulted during the six months ended June 30, 2013.  Loans which were considered troubled debt restructurings by Mid-Wisconsin prior to the acquisition are not required to be classified as troubled debt restructurings in the Company’s financial statements unless or until such loans would subsequently meet criteria to be classified as such, since acquired loans were recorded at their estimated fair values at the time of the acquisition.

Note 7- Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”)

A summary of OREO, net of valuation allowances, for the periods indicated is as follows:
                 
    Three Months ended  Six Months ended 
(in thousands)
  June 30, 2013  June 30, 2012  June  30, 2013  June 30, 2012 
Balance at beginning of period
 $2,038  $260  $193  $641 
Transfer of loans at net realizable value to OREO
  166   744   2,116   1,123 
Sale proceeds
  (884)  (120)  (993)  (820)
Net gain (loss) from sale of OREO
  284   6   288   (54)
Acquired balance, net
  1,756   -   1,756   - 
Balance at end of period
 $3,360  $890  $3,360  $890 
 
21
 

 

 
Note 8- Borrowings
 
At June 30, 2013 the Company had short-term borrowings maturing within twelve months consisting of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances of $20.0 million and short term repurchase agreements of approximately $13.2 million.
 
The Company had the following long term notes payable:
 
(in thousands)
 
June 30, 2013
  
December 31, 2012
 
Joint Venture note
 $10,040  $10,155 
FHLB advances
  15,000   25,000 
Notes Payable
 $25,040  $35,155 
 
At the completion of the construction of the Company’s headquarters building in 2005 and as part of a joint venture investment related to the building, the Company and the other joint venture partners guaranteed a joint venture note to finance certain costs of the building. This note is secured by the building, bears a fixed rate of 5.81% and requires monthly principal and interest payments until its maturity on June 1, 2016.
 
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company’s fixed-rate FHLB advances totaled $15 million and $25 million, respectively, require interest-only monthly payments, and have maturities through August 2016.  The weighted average rate of FHLB advances was 2.45% and 2.87% at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The FHLB advances are collateralized by a blanket lien on qualifying first mortgages, home equity loans, multi-family loans and certain farmland loans which totaled approximately $80.3 million and $54.2 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
 
The following table shows the maturity schedule of the notes payable as of June 30, 2013:
 
Years Ending December 31,
 
(in thousands)
 
2013
 $118 
2014
  10,248 
2015
  262 
2016
  14,412 
   $25,040 
 
Note 9 - Junior Subordinated Debentures
 
At June 30, 2013 the Company’s carrying value of junior subordinated debentures was $12.0 million. In July 2004 Nicolet Bankshares Statutory Trust I (the “Statutory Trust”), issued $6.0 million of guaranteed preferred beneficial interests (“trust preferred securities”) that qualify as Tier I capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. All of the common securities of the Statutory Trust are owned by the Company. The proceeds from the issuance of the common securities and the trust preferred securities were used by the Statutory Trust to purchase $6.2 million of junior subordinated debentures of the Company, which pay an 8% fixed rate. Interest on these debentures is current. The debentures may be redeemed in part or in full, on or after July 15, 2009 at par plus any accrued but unpaid interest. The maturity date of the debenture, if not redeemed, is July 15, 2034.
 
As part of the Mid-Wisconsin acquisition, the Company assumed $10.3 million of junior subordinated debentures related to $10.0 million of issued trust preferred securities.  The trust preferred securities and the debentures mature on December 15, 2035 and have a floating rate of the three-month LIBOR plus 1.43% adjusted quarterly.  The debentures may be called at par in part or in full, on or after December 15, 2010 or within 120 days of certain events.  At acquisition the debentures were recorded at a fair value of $5.8 million, with the discount being accreted to interest expense over the remaining life of the debentures.  The carrying value of the trust preferred securities qualifies as Tier 1 capital.  Interest on these debentures is current.
 
22
 

 

 
Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements
 
The relevant accounting standard (codified in ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements; accordingly, the standard amends numerous accounting pronouncements but does not require any new fair value measurements of reported balances. The standard emphasizes that fair value (i.e. the price that would be received in an orderly transaction that is not a forced liquidation or distressed sale at the measurement date), among other things, is based on exit price versus entry price, should include assumptions about risk such as nonperformance risk in liability fair values, and is a market-based measurement versus an entity-specific measurement.
 
The fair value hierarchy prioritizes inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels.  Level 1 inputs are quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that a company has the ability to access at the measurement date.  Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.   Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity.  In instances where the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels, the level within which the entire fair value measurement will be categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety; this assessment of the significance of an input requires management judgment.
 
The following table presents items measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
 
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
         
   June 30, 2013 
      
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
(in thousands)
 
Total
  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
 
U.S. government sponsored enterprises
 $1,001  $-  $1,001  $- 
State, county and municipals
  52,340       51,965   375 
Mortgage-backed securities
  73,263   -   73,263   - 
Corporate debt securities
  220   -   -   220 
Equity securities
  3,164   3,164   -   - 
Securities available for sale, June 30, 2013
 $129,988  $3,164  $126,229  $595 
 
   December 31, 2012 
      
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
(in thousands)
 
Total
  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
 
State, county and municipals
 $32,687  $-  $32,312  $375 
Mortgage-backed securities
  20,668   -   20,668   - 
Equity securities
  2,546   2,546   -   - 
Securities available for sale, December 31, 2012
 $55,901  $2,546  $52,980  $375 
 
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by the Company for the items noted in the table above, including the general classification of such instruments in the fair value hierarchy. Where quoted market prices on securities exchanges are available, the investment is classified in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 investments primarily include exchange-traded equity securities available for sale. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is generally determined using pricing models (such as matrix pricing which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities), quoted market prices of securities with similar characteristic (adjusted for differences between the quoted instruments and the instrument being valued), or discounted cash flows, and are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Finally, in certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the estimated fair value, investments are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. Examples of these include auction rate securities available for sale (for which there has been no liquid market since 2008) and corporate debt securities.  At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, it was determined that carrying value was the best approximation of fair value for these Level 3 securities, based primarily on receipt of par from refinances for the auction rate securities.
 
23
 

 

 
Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements, continued
 
The following table presents the Company’s collateral-dependent impaired loans and other real estate owned measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
 
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
 
   
June 30, 2013
 
      
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
(in thousands)
 
Total
  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
 
Collateral-dependent impaired loans
 $14,307  $-  $-  $14,307 
Other real estate owned
  3,360   -   -   3,360 
 
   
December 31, 2012
 
      
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
(in thousands)
 
Total
  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
 
Collateral-dependent impaired loans
 $7,026  $-  $-  $7,026 
Other real estate owned
  193   -   -   193 
 
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used by the Company for the items noted in the table above, including the general classification of such instruments in the fair value hierarchy.  For individually evaluated impaired loans, the amount of impairment is based upon the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans, or the estimated liquidity of the note.  For other real estate owned, the fair value is based upon the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral adjusted for the expected costs to sell.
 
Summarized below are the estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, along with the methods and assumptions used by the Company in estimating the fair value disclosures.
 
   
June 30, 2013
 
   
Carrying
  
Estimated
  
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
(in thousands)
 
Amount
  
Fair Value
  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
 
                
Financial assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
 $36,146  $36,146  $36,146  $-  $- 
Certificates of deposit in other banks
  1,960   2,005   -   -   2,005 
Securities available for sale
  129,988   129,988   3,164   126,229   595 
Other investments
  7,531   7,531   -   4,864   2,667 
Loans held for sale
  3,142   3,142   3,142   -   - 
Loans, net
  832,888   819,981   -   -   819,981 
Bank owned life insurance
  23,352   23,352   23,352   -   - 
                     
Financial liabilities:
                    
Deposits
 $908,083  $910,248  $-  $-  $910,248 
Short-term borrowings
  33,231   33,231   33,231   -   - 
Notes payable
  25,040   25,268   -   25,268   - 
Junior subordinated debentures
  12,029   11,617   -   -   11,617 
 
24
 

 

 
Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements, continued
 
  December 31, 2012 
   
Carrying
  
Estimated
  
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
(in thousands)
 
Amount
  
Fair Value
  
Level 1
  
Level 2
  
Level 3
 
Financial assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
 $82,003  $82,003  $82,003  $-  $- 
Securities available for sale
  55,901   55,901   2,546   52,980   375 
Other investments
  5,221   5,221   -   3,243   1,978 
Loans held for sale
  7,323   7,323   7,323   -   - 
Loans, net
  545,481   540,887   -   -   540,887 
Bank owned life insurance
  18,697   18,697   18,697   -   - 
Financial liabilities:
                    
Deposits
 $616,093  $617,677  $-  $-  $617,677 
Short-term borrowings
  4,035   4,035   4,035   -   - 
Notes payable
  35,155   36,017   -   36,017   - 
Junior subordinated debentures
  6,186   6,186   -   -   6,186 
 
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities which are either recorded or disclosed at fair value.
 
Cash and cash equivalents and certificates of deposit in other banks:  For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
 
Securities available for sale and other investments:  Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices on securities exchanges, when available, which is considered a Level 1 measurement.  If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is generally determined using pricing models widely used in the industry, quoted market prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows, which is considered a Level 2 measurement, and Level 3 was deemed appropriate for auction rate securities (for which there has been no liquid market since 2008) and corporate debt securities which include trust preferred security investments.  The corporate debt securities were acquired in the acquisition and valued based on discounted cash flows and the credit quality of the underlying issuer.    The fair value approximates the acquired cost at June 30, 2013.  For other investments, the carrying amount of Federal Reserve Bank and FHLB stock is a reasonably accepted fair value estimate given their restricted nature.  Fair value is the redeemable (carrying) value based on the redemption provisions of the instruments which is considered a Level 2 measurement.  The carrying amount of the remaining other investments (particularly common stocks of companies or other banks that are not publicly traded) approximates their fair value, determined primarily by analysis of company financial statements and recent capital issuances of the respective companies or banks, if any and represents a Level 3 measurement.
 
Loans held for sale:  The carrying amount of loans held for sale approximates the fair value, given the short-term nature of the loans between origination and sale, which is considered a Level 1 measurement.
 
Loans, net: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk or other optionality, fair values are based on carrying values.  Fair values for all other loans are estimated by discounting contractual cash flows using estimated market discount rates, which reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan.  Collateral-dependent impaired loans are included in loans, net.  The fair value of loans is considered to be a Level 3 measurement due to internally developed discounted cash flow measurements.
 
Bank owned life insurance:  The carrying value of these assets approximates fair value, which is considered a Level 1 measurement.
 
Deposits:  The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity (such as demand deposits, savings, interest and non-interest checking, and money market accounts) is, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date.  Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates within the market place.  Use of internal discounted cash flows provides a Level 3 fair value measurement.
 
Short-term borrowings:  Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
 
25
 

 

 
Note 10 - Fair Value Measurements, continued
 
Notes payable:  The fair values of notes payable are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on current interest rates being offered by instruments with similar terms and credit quality which represents a Level 2 measurement.
 
Junior subordinated debentures:  The fair values of junior subordinated debentures are estimated based on an evaluation of current interest rates being offered by instruments with similar terms and credit quality.  Since the market for these instruments is limited, the internal evaluation represents a Level 3 measurement.
 
Off-balance-sheet instruments:  The estimated fair value of letters of credit at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was insignificant.  Loan commitments on which the committed interest rate is less than the current market rate are also insignificant at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
 
Limitations: Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument.  These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument.  Fair value estimates may not be realizable in an immediate settlement of the instrument.  In some instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments, in which case fair values may be based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques, or based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of the financial instruments, or other factors. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimate of future cash flows.  Subsequent changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
 
Note 11 - Subsequent Event
 
On August 9, 2013, Nicolet National Bank (the “Bank”) announced that it entered into an agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities of a one-branch bank in Wausau, Wisconsin, effective immediately. Subject to final settlements, the Bank acquired approximately $29.9 million of the failed bank assets.
 
26
 

 

 
ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
 
Nicolet Bankshares, Inc.  is a bank holding company headquartered in Green Bay, Wisconsin, providing a diversified range of traditional banking and wealth management services to individuals and businesses in its market area through the 22 branch offices of its banking subsidiary, Nicolet National Bank, in northeastern and central Wisconsin and Menominee Michigan.
 
The primary revenue sources of Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Nicolet”) are net interest income, representing interest income from loans and other interest earning assets such as investments, less interest expense on deposits and other borrowings, and noninterest income, including, among others, trust fees, secondary mortgage income and other fees or revenue from financial services provided to customers or ancillary to loans and deposits. Business volumes and pricing drive revenue potential and tend to be influenced by overall economic factors, including market interest rates, business spending, consumer confidence, economic growth and competitive conditions within the marketplace.
 
At June 30, 2013, total assets were $1.1 billion and net income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $12.2 million.  Financial results as of June 30, 2013 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, are largely impacted by the Company’s acquisition of Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. (“Mid-Wisconsin”), consummated on April 26, 2013.  The eleven banking branches of Mid-Wisconsin opened as Nicolet National Bank on April 29, 2013. The transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, and thus, the results of operations of Mid-Wisconsin prior to the consummation date were not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.  At acquisition, the transaction increased total assets by $435 million, total liabilities by $415 million, common equity by approximately $9.3 million, and resulted in a bargain purchase gain of $10.4 million during the second quarter of 2013.  The income statement also includes approximately $1.7 million of pre-tax, non-recurring merger related expenses tied to preparation for, consummation of and integration of Mid-Wisconsin into the Company.  Additionally, acquisition accounting requires assets purchased and liabilities assumed to be recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition, which impacted various ratios, but most notably asset quality measures (as loans are recorded directly at their estimated fair value and no addition to the allowance for loan losses is recorded at consummation) and taxes.  For additional details, see “Note 2 – Acquisition”, Note 6 – Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses, and Credit Quality”, and Income Taxes within this document.
 
On November 28, 2012, Nicolet entered into a merger agreement with Mid-Wisconsin Financial Services, Inc. (“Mid-Wisconsin”), and initially filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Regis. No. 333-186401) (the “Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the provisions of the Securities Act.  On March 26, 2013, the Registration Statement became effective and Nicolet became a public reporting company under Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
Statements made in this document and in documents that are incorporated by reference which are not purely historical are forward-looking statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including any statements regarding descriptions of management’s plans, objectives, or goals for future operations, products or services, and forecasts of its revenues, earnings, or other measures of performance. Forward-looking statements are based on current management expectations and, by their nature, are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements generally may be identified by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “estimate,” “should,” “will,” “intend,” or similar expressions. Stockholders should note that many factors, some of which are discussed elsewhere in this document, could affect the future financial results of Nicolet and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements contained in this document. These factors, many of which are beyond Nicolet’s control, include, but are not necessarily limited to the following:

operating, legal and regulatory risks, including the effects of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and regulations promulgated thereunder, as well as the rules by the Federal bank regulatory agencies to implement the Basel III capital accord;
economic, political and competitive forces affecting Nicolet’s banking and wealth management businesses;
changes in interest rates, monetary policy and general economic conditions, which may impact Nicolet’s net interest income;
potential difficulties in integrating the operations of Nicolet and Mid-Wisconsin;
the risk that Nicolet’s analyses of these risks and forces could be incorrect and/or that the strategies developed to address them could be unsuccessful; and
other factors discussed under “Risk Factors” included in the Joint Proxy Statement-Prospectus contained in the  Registration Statement.
 
27
 

 

 
These factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on such statements.  Nicolet specifically disclaims any obligation to update factors or to publicly announce the results of revisions to any of the forward-looking statements or comments included herein to reflect future events or developments.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
The consolidated financial statements of Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP and follow general practices within the industry in which it operates. This preparation requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, actual results could differ from the estimates, assumptions and judgments reflected in the financial statements. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and, as such, have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include the valuation of loans acquired in the Mid-Wisconsin transaction, as well as the determination of the allowance for loan losses and income taxes and, therefore, are critical accounting policies.
 
Business Combinations and Valuation of Loans Acquired in Business Combination
 
We account for acquisitions under FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, which requires the use of the acquisition method of accounting.  Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are recorded at estimated fair value on their purchase date. As provided for under GAAP, management has up to 12 months following the date of the acquisition to finalize the fair values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities, where it was not possible to estimate the acquisition date fair value upon consummation. Once management has finalized the fair values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities within this 12-month period, management considers such values to be the Day 1 Fair Values.
 
In particular, the valuation of acquired loans involves significant estimates, assumptions and judgment based on information available as of the acquisition date.  Substantially all loans acquired in the transaction are evaluated either individually or in pools of loans with similar characteristics; and since the estimated fair value of acquired loans includes a credit consideration, no carryover of any previously recorded allowance for loan losses is recorded at acquisition. A number of factors are considered in determining the estimated fair value of purchased loans including, among other things, the remaining life of the acquired loans, estimated prepayments, estimated loss ratios, estimated value of the underlying collateral, estimated holding periods, contractual interest rates compared to market interest rates, and net present value of cash flows expected to be received.
 
In determining the Day 1 Fair Values of acquired loans, management calculates a non-accretable difference (the credit mark component of the acquired loans) and an accretable difference (the market rate or yield component of the acquired loans). The non-accretable difference is the difference between the undiscounted contractually required payments and the undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected in accordance with management’s determination of the Day 1 Fair Values. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses. Subsequent increases in cash flows will result in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior charges and then an adjustment to accretable yield, and nonaccretable difference which would have a positive impact on interest income.
 
The accretable yield on acquired loans is the difference between the expected cash flows and the initial investment in the acquired loans. The accretable yield is recognized into earnings using the effective yield method over the term of the loans. Management separately monitors the acquired loan portfolio and periodically reviews loans contained within this portfolio against the factors and assumptions used in determining the Day 1 Fair Values.
 
Allowance for Loan Losses
 
The allowance for loan losses (the “ALLL”) is a reserve for estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans determined to be impaired as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Actual credit losses, net of recoveries, are deducted from the ALLL. Loans are charged off when management believes that the collectability of the principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the ALLL. A provision for loan losses, which is a charge against earnings, is recorded to bring the ALLL to a level that, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. Management’s evaluation process used to determine the appropriateness of the ALLL is subject to the use of estimates, assumptions, and judgment. The evaluation process involves gathering and interpreting many qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect probable credit losses. Because interpretation and analysis involves judgment, current economic or business conditions can change, and future events are inherently difficult to predict, the anticipated amount of estimated loan losses and therefore the appropriateness of the ALLL could change significantly.
 
28
 

 

 
The allocation methodology applied by Nicolet is designed to assess the appropriateness of the ALLL and includes allocations for specifically identified impaired loans and loss factor allocations for all remaining loans, with a component primarily based on historical loss rates and a component primarily based on other qualitative factors. The methodology includes evaluation and consideration of several factors, such as, but not limited to, management’s ongoing review and grading of loans, facts and issues related to specific loans, historical loan loss and delinquency experience, trends in past due and nonaccrual loans, existing risk characteristics of specific loans or loan pools, the fair value of underlying collateral, current economic conditions and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses. While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions or circumstances underlying the collectability of loans. Because each of the criteria used is subject to change, the allocation of the ALLL is made for analytical purposes and is not necessarily indicative of the trend of future loan losses in any particular loan category. The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any segment of the loan portfolio. Management believes the ALLL is appropriate. The allowance analysis is reviewed by the board of directors on a quarterly basis in compliance with regulatory requirements. In addition, various regulatory agencies periodically review the ALLL. These agencies may require Nicolet to make additions to the ALLL based on their judgments of collectability based on information available to them at the time of their examination.
 
Income taxes
 
The assessment of income tax assets and liabilities involves the use of estimates, assumptions, interpretation, and judgment concerning certain accounting pronouncements and federal and state tax codes. There can be no assurance that future events, such as court decisions or positions of federal and state taxing authorities, will not differ from management’s current assessment, the impact of which could be significant to the consolidated results of operations and reported earnings. Nicolet files a consolidated federal income tax return and a combined state income tax return (both of which include Nicolet and its wholly owned subsidiaries). Accordingly, amounts equal to tax benefits of those companies having taxable federal losses or credits are reimbursed by the companies that incur federal tax liabilities. Amounts provided for income tax expense are based on income reported for financial statement purposes and do not necessarily represent amounts currently payable under tax laws. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax law rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through provision for income tax expense. Valuation allowances are established when it is more likely than not that a portion of the full amount of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. In assessing the ability to realize deferred tax assets, management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies.  Nicolet may also recognize a liability for unrecognized tax benefits from uncertain tax positions. Unrecognized tax benefits represent the differences between a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefit recognized and measured in the financial statements. Penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are classified as income tax expense.
 
The following discussion is Nicolet management’s analysis of the consolidated financial condition as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and results of operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.  It should be read in conjunction with Nicolet’s audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and for the three years ended December 31, 2012, included in the Registration Statement.
 
Performance Summary
 
Nicolet reported net income of $12.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $1.2 million for the comparable period of 2012. Net income available to common shareholders for the six months of 2013 was $11.6 million, or $3.11 per diluted common share, compared to net income available to common shareholders of $0.5 million, or $0.16 per diluted common share, for the first six months of 2012.  Income statement results and average balances for 2013 include approximately two months of Mid-Wisconsin activity (as results of operations of Mid-Wisconsin prior to consummation are appropriately not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements). Results from the first half 2013 included a bargain purchase gain of $10.4 million and pre-tax, non-recurring expenses of approximately $1.7 million specifically related to the consummation and integration of the Mid-Wisconsin transaction.
 
Net interest income was $14.6 million for the first six months of 2013, an increase of $4.2 million or 40% over the first six months of 2012.  The improvement was predominantly volume related, given the timing of the acquisition, but also favorably impacted by an increase in interest rate spread on higher average earning assets.  On a tax-equivalent basis, the net interest margin for first half 2013 was 3.74%, up 20 basis points (“bps”) from 3.54% for first half 2012.  The cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 0.91%, 48 bps lower than first half 2012, while the average yield on earning assets was 4.49%, 20 bps lower than first half 2012, resulting in a 28 bps improvement in the interest rate spread.
 
29
 

 

 
Loans were $841 million at June 30, 2013, up $288 million or 52% over $553 million at December 31, 2012, with $272 million of loans added from Mid-Wisconsin at acquisition.  Between the comparative six month periods, average loans were $651 million in 2013 yielding 5.09%, compared to $495 million in 2012 yielding 5.24%.
 
Total deposits were $908 million at June 30, 2013, up $292 million or 47% over $616 million at December 31, 2012, with $346 million of deposits added from Mid-Wisconsin at acquisition, offset in part by a customary pattern of deposit decline historically following year ends through the first six-month periods.  For perspective, total deposits grew $368 million since June 30, 2012, $22 million more than the acquired balances. Average total deposits for first half 2013 were $699 million compared to $523 million for first half 2012, up 34%.
 
While impacted by the merger, asset quality measures remained strong, with nonperforming assets at 1.62% of total assets at June 30, 2013, compared to 0.97% at year end 2012. The allowance for loan losses was $7.7 million or 0.91% of loans at June 30, 2013 (impacted by the merger adding no allowance for loan losses while adding $272 million to loans at acquisition), compared to $7.1 million or 1.29%, respectively, at December 31, 2012.  The provision for loan losses was $2.0 million with net charge offs of $1.4 million for the first half of 2013, versus provision of $2.4 million with $2.2 million of net charge offs for the first half of 2012.
 
Noninterest income was $16.5 million for the first six months of 2013, up $11.2 million over the first six months of 2012, with $10.4 million of this variance attributable to the bargain purchase gain recorded in conjunction with the merger.  With the exception of investment advisory fees and net gains on sales of assets, all other categories were up from the prior year, including service charges (up $0.2 million or 33%), trust fee income (up $0.4 million or 29%), and mortgage income (up $0.2 million or 13%) compared to the first six months of 2012.
 
Noninterest expense was $15.9 million for the first six months of 2013, up $4.1 million over the first half of 2012, as the first half of 2013 included approximately two months of increased operations from the Mid-Wisconsin transaction and approximately $1.7 million of non-recurring merger-related expenses.  Most notably, salaries and benefits accounted for $2.4 million of the increase (of which approximately $1 million was attributable to non-recurring merger expenses), and Other expenses increased $0.9 million (of which nearly $0.7 million was attributable to non-recurring merger expenses).
 
Net Interest Income
 
Nicolet’s earnings are substantially dependent on net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on investments and loans and the interest paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is directly impacted by the sensitivity of the balance sheet to changes in interest rates and by the amount and composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including characteristics such as the fixed or variable nature of the financial instruments, contractual maturities, and repricing frequencies.
 
Comparison of the six months ending June 30, 2013 versus 2012
 
Net interest income in the consolidated statements of income (which excludes any taxable equivalent adjustment) was $14.6 million in the first six months of 2013, compared to $10.4 million in the first half of 2012. Taxable equivalent adjustments (adjustments to bring tax-exempt interest to a level that would yield the same after-tax income had that been subject to a 34% tax rate) were $275,000 and $316,000 for the first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively, resulting in taxable equivalent net interest income of $14.8 million for first half of 2013 and $10.7 million for first half of 2012.
 
Taxable equivalent net interest income is a non-GAAP measure, but is a preferred industry measurement of net interest income (and its use in calculating a net interest margin) as it enhances the comparability of net interest income arising from taxable and tax-exempt sources.
 
Net interest income is the primary source of Nicolet’s revenue, and is the difference between interest income on earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other borrowings. Net interest income is directly impacted by the sensitivity of the balance sheet to changes in interest rates and by the amount, mix and composition of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including characteristics such as the fixed or variable nature of the financial instruments, contractual maturities, and repricing frequencies.
 
Tables 1through 5 present information to facilitate the review and discussion of selected average balance sheet items, taxable equivalent net interest income, interest rate spread and net interest margin.
 
30
 

 

 
Table 1:  Year-To-Date Net Interest Income Analysis
    
  
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   2013  
2012
 
(in thousands)
 
Average
Balance
  
Interest
  
Average
Rate
  
Average
Balance
  
Interest
  
Average
Rate
 
ASSETS
                  
Earning assets
                  
Loans (1) (2) (3)(4)
 $651,256  $16,658   5.09 % $494,647  $13,065   5.24 %
Investment securities
                        
Taxable
  57,508   402   1.40 %  20,802   321   3.09 %
Tax-exempt (2)
  28,889   585   4.05 %  26,423   656   4.96 %
Other interest-earning assets
  51,205   149   0.58 %  56,847   121   0.43 %
Total interest-earning assets
  788,858  $17,794   4.49 %  598,719  $14,163   4.69 %
Cash and due from banks
  4,449           11,558         
Other assets
  59,991           39,603         
Total assets
 $853,298          $649,880         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                        
Interest-bearing liabilities
                        
Savings
 $63,812  $98   0.31 % $26,940  $59   0.44 %
Interest-bearing demand
  135,395   591   0.88 %  84,149   389   0.93 %
MMA
  197,793   370   0.38 %  164,487   402   0.49 %
Core CDs and IRAs
  156,038   851   1.10 %  139,310   1,292   1.86 %
Brokered deposits
  35,589   116   0.66 %  33,197   375   2.27 %
Total interest-bearing deposits
  588,627   2,026   0.69 %  448,083   2,517   1.13 %
Other interest-bearing liabilities
  61,679   923   2.98 %  46,373   927   3.96 %
Total interest-bearing liabilities
  650,306   2,949   0.91 %  494,456   3,444   1.39 %
Noninterest-bearing demand
  110,189           74,719         
Other liabilities
  6,656           4,388         
Total equity
  86,147           76,317         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 $853,298          $649,880         
Net interest income and rate spread
     $14,845   3.58 %     $10,719   3.30 %
Net interest margin
          3.74 %          3.54 %
 
(1)   Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.
(2)   The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34% and adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.
(3)   Interest income for the period ending June 30, includes loan fees of $250,000 in 2013, and $115,000 in 2012.
(4)   Includes accretable yield from acquired loans
 
31
 

 

 
Table 2:  Volume/Rate Variance
 
Comparison of six months ended June 30, 2013 versus 2012:
 
         
   
Increase (decrease)
Due to Changes in
 
(in thousands)
 
Volume
  
Rate
  
Net(3)
 
Earning assets
         
          
Loans (1)(2)(4)                                                                      
 $3,959  $(366) $3,593 
Investment securities
            
Taxable                                                                      
  260   (179 )  81 
     Tax-exempt (2)                                                                      
  57   (128 )  (71 )
Other interest-earning assets                                                                      
  11   17   28 
             
Total interest-earning assets                                                                      
 $4,287  $(656) $3,631 
              
Interest-bearing liabilities
            
Interest-bearing demand                                                                      
 $224  $(22) $202 
Savings deposits                                                                      
  61   (22 )  39 
MMA                                                                      
  72   (104 )  (32 )
Core CDs and IRAs                                                                      
  140   (581 )  (441 )
             
Brokered deposits                                                                      
  25   (284 )  (259 )
             
Total interest-bearing deposits                                                                      
  522   (1,013 )  (491 )
Other interest-bearing liabilities                                                                      
  203   (207 )  (4 )
             
Total interest-bearing liabilities                                                                      
  725   (1,220 )  (495 )
Net interest income                                                                      
 $3,562  $564  $4,126 
 
(1)   Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.
(2)   The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34% adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.
(3)   The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated in proportion to the relationship of dollar amounts of change in each.
(4)   Includes accretable yield from acquired loans
 
32
 

 

 
Table 3:  Quarterly Net Interest Income Analysis
       
  
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2013
  
2012
 
(in thousands)
 
Average
Balance
  
Interest
  
Average
Rate
  
Average
Balance
  
Interest
  
Average
Rate
 
ASSETS
                  
Earning assets
                  
Loans (1) (2) (3)(4)
 $754,352  $9,860   5.18 % $504,876  $6,570   5.16 %
Investment securities
                        
Taxable
  88,622   275   1.24 %  22,249   158   2.84 %
Tax-exempt (2)
  31,792   309   3.89 %  26,118   321   4.91 %
Other interest-earning assets
  32,580   69   0.85 %  35,831   50   0.56 %
Total interest-earning assets
  907,346  $10,513   4.60 %  589,074  $7,099   4.78 %
Cash and due from banks
  2,271           11,091         
Other assets
  78,244           43,001         
Total assets
 $987,861          $643,166         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                        
Interest-bearing liabilities
                        
Savings
 $78,476  $50   0.25 % $29,645  $34   0.46 %
Interest-bearing demand
  154,196   286   0.74 %  87,807   211   0.96 %
MMA
  203,043   172   0.34 %  156,466   181   0.46 %
Core CDs and IRAs
  195,713   443   0.91 %  135,002   606   1.81 %
Brokered deposits
  41,876   74   0.71 %  30,934   112   1.45 %
Total interest-bearing deposits
  673,304   1,025   0.61 %  439,854   1,144   1.05 %
Other interest-bearing liabilities
  82,810   515   2.46 %  47,051   464   3.90 %
Total interest-bearing liabilities
  756,114   1,540   0.81 %  486,905   1,608   1.32 %
Noninterest-bearing demand
  129,978           75,101         
Other liabilities
  7,196           4,797         
Total equity
  94,573           76,363         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
 $987,861          $643,166         
Net interest income and rate spread
     $8,973   3.79 %     $5,491   3.46 %
Net interest margin
          3.92 %          3.69 %
 
(1)   Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.
(2)   The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34% and adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.
(3)   Interest income for the period ending June 30, includes loan fees of $170,000 in 2013, and $103,000 in 2012.
(4)   Includes accretable yield from acquired loans
 
33
 

 

 
Table 4:  Volume/Rate Variance
 
Comparison of three months ended June 30, 2013 versus 2012:
 
         
   
Increase (decrease)
Due to Changes in
 
(in thousands)
 
Volume
  
Rate
  
Net(3)
 
Earning assets
         
          
Loans (1)(2)(4)                                                                      
 $3,263  $27  $3,290 
Investment securities
            
Taxable                                                                      
  214   (97 )  117 
     Tax-exempt (2)                                                                      
  62   (74 )  (12 )
Other interest-earning assets                                                                      
  14   5   19 
             
Total interest-earning assets                                                                      
 $3,553  $(139) $3,414 
              
Interest-bearing liabilities
            
Interest-bearing demand                                                                      
 $133  $(58) $75 
Savings deposits                                                                      
  36   (20 )  16 
MMA                                                                      
  46   (55 )  (9 )
Core CDs and IRAs                                                                      
  209   (372 )  (163 )
             
Brokered deposits                                                                      
  31   (69 )  (38 )
             
Total interest-bearing deposits                                                                      
  455   (574 )  (119 )
Other interest-bearing liabilities                                                                      
  211   (160 )  51 
             
Total interest-bearing liabilities                                                                      
  666   (734 )  (68 )
Net interest income                                                                      
 $2,887  $595  $3,482 
 
(1)   Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.
(2)   The yield on tax-exempt loans and tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34% adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.
(3)   The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated in proportion to the relationship of dollar amounts of change in each.
(4)   Includes accretable yield from acquired loans
 
Table 5: Interest Rate Spread, Margin and Average Balance Mix — Taxable-Equivalent Basis
                         
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
  2013   2012 
(in thousands)
 Average
Balance
   % of
Earning
Assets
    Yield/Rate  Average
Balance
  % of
Earning
Assets
  Yield/Rate 
Total loans
 $651,256   82.6 %  5.09 % $494,647   82.6 %  5.24 %
Securities and other earning assets
  137,602   17.4 %  1.65 %  104,072   17.4 %  2.11 %
Total interest-earning assets
 $788,858   100 %  4.49 % $598,719   100 %  4.69 %
                          
Interest-bearing liabilities
 $650,306   82.4 %  0.91 % $494,456   82.6 %  1.39 %
Noninterest-bearing funds, net
  138,552   17.6 %      104,263   17.4 %    
Total funds sources
 $788,858   100 %  0.75 % $598,719   100 %  1.15 %
                         
Interest rate spread
          3.58 %          3.30 %
Contribution from net free funds
          0.16 %          0.24 %
Net interest margin
          3.74 %          3.54 %
 
34
 

 

 
Taxable-equivalent net interest income was $14.8 million for the first six months of 2013, an increase of $4.1 million or 38% over the same period in 2012.  The $4.1 million increase in net interest income was predominantly volume related, given the timing of the acquisition, but was also favorably impacted by an increase in interest rate spread on higher average earning assets.  Taxable equivalent interest income increased $3.6 million between the six-month periods (including $4.0 million from higher loan volumes, less $0.4 million from lower loan yields).  Interest expense fell $0.5 million between the six-month periods due to beneficial growth in the mix of lower-costing funds (with $1.2 million less interest expense from favorable rate changes, but $0.7 million more interest expense from higher interest-bearing liabilities volume).
 
The taxable-equivalent net interest margin was 3.74% for the first six months of 2013, up 20 bps over the first half of 2012, with improvement in the cost of funds at 0.91% (down 48 bps), offset partly by a lower earning asset yield at 4.49% (down 20 bps) and an 8 bps decrease in net free funds.  In general, there has been, and will continue to be, considerable downward margin pressure as assets mature in this prolonged low-rate environment, with current reinvestment rates substantially lower than previous rates and less opportunity to offset such with similar changes in the already low cost of funds.
 
The earning asset yield was comprised mainly of loans, representing 82.6% of average earning assets and yielding 5.09% for first half 2013, compared to 82.6% and 5.24%, respectively, for first half 2012, but aided in 2013 by the timing of the acquisition and the positive rate profile of acquired loans. If acquired loans marked to estimated fair value at acquisition resolve or perform more favorably than originally anticipated, there is and will continue to be potential for favorable loan yield adjustments.  All other interest earning assets combined yielded 1.65%, down 46 bps compared to first half 2012, but aided in 2013 by a higher mix of investments (representing 11.0% of average earning assets, compared to 7.9% for first half 2012) that earn more than the other cash-equivalent earning assets.
 
Nicolet’s cost of funds continued its favorable decline during the low-rate environment, at 0.91% for the first half of 2013, 48 bps lower than the first half 2012. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits (which represent over 90% of average interest-bearing liabilities for both years), was 0.69% for the first half of 2013, down 44 bps versus the first half 2012, with favorable rate variances in all deposit categories and higher mix of balances in lower-costing transactional deposits (savings, checking and MMA). Average brokered deposit balances remained stable for the comparable six-month periods, however, their cost decreased from 2.27% in 2012 to 0.66% in 2013, as a significant portion of the higher rate brokered deposit balances matured since June 30, 2012, and were replaced with shorter-term, less-costly brokereds in anticipation of the merger and seasonal deposit declines.   The cost of other interest-bearing liabilities (comprised of short- and long-term borrowings) decreased to 2.98%, down 98 bps between the six-month periods, mainly from increased usage of short-term advances at favorable rates in addition to the prepayment of $10 million in higher-costing advances during the first quarter 2013 and the acquisition at fair value of a lower-rate junior subordinated debenture in second quarter 2013.
 
Average interest-earning assets were $789 million for the first half of 2013, $190 million or 32% higher than the first half of 2012, led by a $157 million increase in average loans (to $651 million or 83% of interest earning assets) and a $39 million increase in average investments (to $86 million or 11% of earning assets), both heavily influenced by the size and timing of the acquisition in 2013.
 
Average interest-bearing liabilities were $650 million, up $156 million or 32% over the first half of 2012, led by a $138 million increase in non-brokered interest-bearing deposits (to $553 million or 85% of average interest-bearing liabilities) and a $15 million increase in average other interest-bearing liabilities (to $62 million), both heavily influenced by the size and timing of the acquisition in 2013.
 
Provision for Loan Losses
 
The provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $2.0 million and $2.4 million respectively.  The provision for loan losses has been trending down, with asset quality trends improving in the non-acquired portfolio (primarily from work-outs of problem loans and declining net charge-offs), as well as credit discounts being included directly in the estimated fair value of recently acquired loans (and accordingly no allowance for loan losses recorded at acquisition).   At December 31, 2012, the ALLL was $7.1 million which grew to $7.7 million at June 30, 2013, given the $2.0 million provision for loan losses and net charge offs of $1.4 million during the first six months of 2013.  The ratio of the ALLL to total loans was 0.91% at June 30, 2013, impacted most notably by the 2013 acquisition, which added no allowance for loan losses to the numerator (as noted above) and $272 million of loans into the denominator as of the date of acquisition.   As events occur in the acquired loan portfolio, an ALLL will be established for this pool of assets as appropriate.  Comparatively, the ALLL to total loans was 1.29% at December 31, 2012.  Nonperforming loans were improving prior to the acquisition, starting at $7.0 million (or 1.3% of total loans) at December 31, 2012, to $2.7 million (or 0.5% of loans) at March 31, 2013, and then increased to $14.3 million (or 1.7% of loans) at June 30, 2013.  The $11.6 million increase from March 31 to June 30, 2013, included approximately $10.9 million of acquired loans brought on in a nonaccruing and impaired status at acquisition.
 
35
 

 

 
The provision for loan losses is predominantly a function of Nicolet’s methodology and judgment as to qualitative and quantitative factors used to determine the adequacy of the ALLL. The adequacy of the ALLL is affected by changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio, changes in levels of impaired and other nonperforming loans, historical losses and delinquencies in each portfolio segment, the risk inherent in specific loans, concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries, existing and future economic conditions, the fair value of underlying collateral, and other factors which could affect potential credit losses. For additional information regarding asset quality and the ALLL, see “Balance Sheet Analysis — Loans,” and “Balance Sheet Analysis — Impaired Loans and Nonperforming Assets.”
 
Noninterest Income
 
Table 6:  Noninterest Income
                          
   
For the three months ended June 30,
  For the six months ended June 30, 
   
2013
  
2012
  
$ Change
  
% Change
  
2013
  
2012
  
$ Change
  
% Change
 
(in thousands)
                        
Service charges on deposit accounts
 $470  $280  $190   67.9 % $754  $567  $187   33.0 %
Trust services fee income
  1,074   724   350   48.3   1,876   1,454   422   29.0 
Mortgage income
  714   671   43   6.4   1,586   1,408   178   12.6 
Brokerage fee income
  115   81   34   42.0   217   165   52   31.5 
Gain on sale of assets, net
  45   237   (192)  (81.0)  49   383   (334)  (87.2)
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”)
  212   183   29   15.8   381   336   45   13.4 
Rent income
  274   240   34   14.2   524   480   44   9.2 
Investment advisory fees
  76   85   (9)  (10.6)  162   171   (9)  (5.3)
Bargain purchase gain
  10,435   -   10,435   100.0   10,435   -   10,435   100.0 
Other
  351   176   175   99.4   538   337   201   59.6 
Total noninterest income
 $13,766  $2,677  $11,089   414.2 % $16,522  $5,301  $11,221   211.7 %
 
Comparison of the six months ending June 30, 2013 versus 2012
 
Noninterest income was $16.5 million for the six months of 2013, an increase of $11.2 million from 2012 or 211.7%, with a $10.4 million bargain purchase gain included in the second quarter 2013.  The bargain purchase gain was calculated as the net difference in the fair value of the net assets acquired of $20.6 million less the consideration paid of $10.2 million resulting in the net bargain purchase gain of $10.4 million.  The details of the acquisition accounting are located in Note 2 of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.  Without the bargain purchase gain, noninterest income was up $0.8 million or 14.8% between the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, impacted mostly by the size and timing of the Mid-Wisconsin transaction but offset partly by a negative swing in net gain on assets sold of $0.3 million.
 
Service fees on deposit accounts were $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, up $0.2 million (or 33.0%) over the first six months of 2012.  The increase is primarily from increased service charges on deposits given the increase in deposit balances and accounts mainly from the merger, and higher non-sufficient funds (“NSF”) fees.
 
Trust service fees increased to $1.9 million for the first six months of 2013, up $0.4 million or 29.0% over first half 2012. In addition to the larger base of customers acquired through the merger, there was continued market improvement on assets under management, on which fees are based.  Similarly, brokerage fees were $0.2 million, up $52,000 or 31.5% over first half 2012, mainly from increased legacy business, market improvements and to a lesser degree from the merger.  The expanded footprint of the bank will provide growth potential for wealth management in future periods.  
 
Mortgage income represents net gains received from the sale of residential real estate loans service-released into the secondary market and to a small degree, some related income. Residential refinancing activity and new purchase activity continues to remain steady, despite mortgage rates being higher than a year ago and trending upward.  Mortgage income was $1.6 million for the first six months of 2013, up $0.2 million or 12.6% over the first half of 2012, though slowing slightly for second versus first quarter of 2013.  The increase between six-month periods was not significantly impacted by the acquisition.
 
During the first half of 2013, Nicolet recognized a $49,000 net gain on sale of assets in the first six months of 2013 compared to $383,000 net gain in the comparable period of 2012.  The activity in 2013 consisted of $239,000 of net losses on sales of investments (mainly the result of selling a large portion of the acquired investment portfolio in second quarter to prepay higher costing debt assumed in the merger), more than offset by $288,000 of net gains on sales of OREO (as properties were resolved at better than expected terms).   Investments were recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition but an increase in rates during second quarter resulted in additional market declines realized on investments sold during the second quarter related to planned balance sheet reductions.  For the first six months of 2012, securities sales produced net gains of $440,000, while net losses on OREO were $57,000.
 
36
 

 

 
BOLI income was $0.4 million for the first six months of 2013, up $45,000 from the comparable period in 2012, or 13.4%, mainly from the timing of additional BOLI procured.  New BOLI investment of $3.8 million was procured in the first quarter 2012 and $4.3 million was acquired in the Mid-Wisconsin transaction (bringing the 2013 six-month average of BOLI investment to $20.4 million, up 21% over the comparable period last year).   Rent income, investment advisory fees and other noninterest income combined were $1.2 million for the first half of 2013 compared to $1.0 million for the first half 2012, with the majority of the increase due to ancillary fees tied to deposit-related products, most particularly debit card, check cashing and wire fee income.
 
Noninterest Expense
 
Table 7:  Noninterest Expense
                       
   
For the three months ended June 30,
  
For the six months ended June 30,
 
   
2013
  
2012
  
$ Change
  
% Change
  
2013
  
2012
  
$ Change
  
% Change
 
(in thousands)
                        
Salaries and employee benefits
 $5,555  $3,393  $2,162   63.7 % $9,114  $6,666  $2,448   36.7 %
Occupancy, equipment and office
  1,466   1,102   364   33.0   2,570   2,241   329   14.7 
Business development and marketing
  473   352   121   34.4   898   697   201   28.8 
Data processing
  572   410   162   39.5   995   812   183   22.5 
FDIC assessments
  130   138   (8)  (5.8)  240   274   (34)  (12.4)
Core deposit intangible amortization
  286   168   118   70.2   434   336   98   29.2 
Other
  1,104   446   658   147.5   1,675   768   907   118.1 
Total noninterest expense
 $9,586  $6,009  $3,577   59.5 % $15,926  $11,794  $4,132   35.0 %
 
Comparison of the six months ending June 30, 2013 versus 2012
 
Total noninterest expense for the six months ending June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $15.9 million and $11.8 million, respectively, up $4.1 million or 35.0%, as the first half of 2013 included approximately two months of increased operations from the Mid-Wisconsin transaction and approximately $1.7 million of non-recurring merger-related expenses.  Most notably, salaries and benefits accounted for $2.4 million of the increase (of which approximately $1 million was attributable to non-recurring merger expenses, such as stay bonuses, severances and related payroll taxes), and other expense increased $0.9 million (of which nearly $0.7 million was attributable to non-recurring merger expenses, predominantly legal or consultant in nature for consummation and integration).
 
Salaries and employee benefits expense increased by $2.4 million or 36.7%, over the first half of 2012, with approximately $1 million attributable to nonrecurring merger-related costs as noted above.  The increase was otherwise commensurate with the growing workforce and impacted by merit increases between the years and higher overtime in preparation for the merger.  Average full time equivalent employees for the first half of 2013 were 226, versus 158 for first half 2012 (up 43%).
 
Occupancy, equipment and office expense increased $0.3 million to $2.6 million for the first six months of 2013 compared to first half 2012.   This 14.7% increase is in line with the addition of 11 branches which nearly doubled our physical facilities and depreciation expense for two of the first six months in 2013.  Utilities, rent, and other occupancy expenses increased proportionately in conjunction with the merger.
 
Business development and marketing expense for the first six months of 2013 increased $0.2 million compared to the same period in 2012.  This 28.8% increase was a result of the greater focus on growth in loans, sales seminars and events, higher charitable donations in 2013, and merger-related travel and business development costs.
 
Data processing, FDIC assessments and core deposit intangible amortization combined increased from $1.4 million for the first six months in 2012 to $1.7 million for the same period in 2013.  Core deposit intangible amortization increased given the new $4.0 million core deposit intangible recorded at acquisition being amortized over a 10-year period.  Data processing expenses (which are primarily volume based) rose individually 22.5%, in line with two months of increased size.  FDIC assessments declined slightly (down $34,000) despite the rise in assets as Nicolet experienced a reduction in the assessment rate beginning in first quarter 2013.
 
Other expense increased $0.9 million for the first half of 2013, compared to the same time period in 2012.  Legal, consulting, and accounting fees combined accounted for $0.7 million of the increase and were predominantly related to the merger activity. The remaining increase is primarily from higher foreclosure expenses and higher insurance costs related to Nicolet’s increased size and public nature.
 
37
 

 

 
Income Taxes
 
For the first six months of 2013 income tax expense was $1.0 million compared to $0.4 for the same period of 2012.  The effective tax rates were 7.3% and 24.4% for first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively, influenced largely by the bargain purchase gain which was a tax free transaction.  The tax rate for the first six months of 2013 without the bargain purchase gain would have been 34.7%.  GAAP requires that deferred income taxes be analyzed to determine if a valuation allowance is required. A valuation allowance is required if it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.  No valuation allowance was determined to be necessary.
 
Comparison of the three months ending June 30, 2013 versus 2012
 
Nicolet reported net income of $11.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $0.6 million for the comparable period of 2012, with second quarter 2013 including the $10.4 million bargain purchase gain and approximately $1.5 million of non-recurring pre-tax merger-related expenses.  Net income available to common shareholders for the second quarter of 2013 was $11.2 million, or $2.78 per diluted common share, compared to net income available to common shareholders of $0.3 million, or $0.09 per diluted common share, for the second quarter of 2012. Income statement results and average balances for second quarter 2013 include approximately two months of activity from Mid-Wisconsin.
 
Taxable equivalent net interest income was $9.0 million for second quarter 2013, up $3.5 million or 65.3% over second quarter 2012, with $2.9 million of the increase from volume variances (given the larger balance sheet following the acquisition), and $0.6 million improvement from rate variances (predominantly from lower cost of funds between the comparable quarters).
 
For the second quarter of 2013, the earning asset yield was 4.60%, 18 bps lower than the second quarter of last year, mainly due to a decline in the yield on non-loan earning assets (which combined cost 1.71%, down 80 bps from second quarter 2012), and pressured additionally by non-loan earning assets (which earn less than loans) representing a higher percentage of average earning assets (to 16.9% for first half 2013 versus 14.3% for first half 2012).  Loans yielded 5.18%, up 2 bps over the second quarter 2012, aided mostly by the timing of the acquisition and the positive rate profile of acquired loans.
 
Between the second quarter periods, the cost of funds declined 51 bps to 0.81% in 2013 versus 1.32% in 2012.  All funding categories showed significantly lower rates between the second quarter periods, as the majority of maturities of higher costing CDs or wholesale debt were renewed in full or in part into shorter-term, lower-costing funding, and rates offered on many transaction deposit products (within savings, checking and MMA) were lowered by Nicolet over the year since June 30, 2012. Average other interest-bearing liabilities (consisting primarily of FHLB advances, junior subordinated debentures and notes payable) increased $35.8 million between the second quarter periods, as approximately 80% of Mid-Wisconsin debt acquired was paid off during the quarter and thus inflated the average balance of second quarter 2013. FHLB advances acquired in the Mid-Wisconsin transaction were marked at fair value assuming immediate payoff; however, they were repaid later in the second quarter, with the most notable result being a $0.2 million ‘recovery’ of prepayment penalty recorded in other expense as required by accounting standards.
 
Noninterest income was $13.8 million for second quarter 2013, and without the bargain purchase gain was $3.3 million, compared to $2.7 million for second quarter 2012.  Aside from investment advisory fees and the lower net gains on sale of assets, all other categories increased mainly in light of being a larger institution with increased volumes.  Other income for second quarter 2013 nearly doubled to $0.4 million versus the second quarter of 2012, mainly due to higher fee income ancillary to deposit activity (such as debit cards, wires and checking cashing, and safe deposit boxes) given our increased size.
 
Noninterest expense was $9.6 million for the second quarter of 2013, up $3.6 million over second quarter 2012, including approximately $1.5 million of non-recurring merger-based expenses and reflecting proportionate increases as a result of the timing and size of the merger.  For the quarter, FDIC assessments were down 5.8% minimally from the prior year but increased from the first quarter of 2013 by $20,000 as a result of the larger asset size.  Other expenses include legal, consulting and audit expense and increased $0.7 million for the second quarter of 2013 when compared to the second quarter of 2012.  These expenses included approximately $0.4 million in the second quarter alone with the primary expense related to the payment of the investment banker on consummation of the merger.  Additional consulting and legal expenses were up $0.1 million when compared to the first quarter of 2013 and represented approximately $0.6 million in total for the year.  We did realize a net gain on repayment of FHLB advances of $0.2 million as a result of incurring less prepayment penalty than determined at the time of merger due to a slight lag in paying off the debt, however much of this was captured in increased interest expenses while we maintained the advances.
 
38
 

 

 
The provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $1.0 million and $1.1 million respectively.  At June 30, 2013, the ALLL was $7.7 million (or 0.91% of total loans) compared to $6.0 million (or 1.19% of total loans) at June 30, 2012.  Net charge offs for the quarter ending June 30, 2013 were $0.9 million compared to $1.1 million for the same period in 2012.
 
Income tax expense was $0.5 million and $0.2 million for the second quarters of 2013 and 2012, respectively.   The effective tax rates were 4.5% (or 34.4% when removing the impact of the tax free bargain purchase gain) for second quarter 2013 and 26.5% for second quarter 2012.        
 
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
 
Loans
 
Nicolet services a diverse customer base throughout Northeast and Central Wisconsin and in Menominee, Michigan including the following industries: manufacturing, agriculture, wholesaling, retail, service, and businesses supporting the general building industry. It continues to concentrate its efforts in originating loans in its local markets and assisting its current loan customers. It actively utilizes government loan programs such as those provided by the U.S. Small Business Administration to help customers weather current economic conditions and position their businesses for the future.
 
Nicolet’s primary lending function is to make commercial loans, consisting of commercial and industrial business loans, agricultural production, and owner-occupied commercial real estate loans; commercial real estate (“CRE”) loans, consisting of commercial investment real estate loans, agricultural real estate, and construction and land development loans; residential real estate loans, including residential first mortgages, residential junior mortgages (such as home equity loans and lines), and to a lesser degree residential construction loans; and retail and other loans.
 
Total loans were $841 million at June 30, 2013 compared to $553 million at December 31, 2012.  This balance included acquired loans of $272 million at acquisition, representing a net increase of $16 million of originated loans.  The increase was largely due to strong loan growth in the second quarter of $27 million offsetting the $11 million decrease which occurred in the first quarter versus year end 2012.
 
Table 8: Period End Loan Composition
                                        
   
For the three months ended,
 
   
June 30, 2013
  
March 31, 2013
  
December 31, 2012
  
September 30, 2012
  
June 30, 2012
 
(in thousands)
 
Amount
  
% of
Total
  
Amount
  
% of
Total
  
Amount
  
% of
Total
  
Amount
  
% of
Total
  
Amount
  
% of
Total
 
Commercial & industrial
 $245,856   29.3 % $193,288   35.7 % $197,301   35.8 % $201,049   36.8 % $199,028   38.5 %
Agricultural production
  13,114   1.6   219   -   215   -   315   0.1   183   - 
Owner-occupied CRE
  181,101   21.5   107,523   19.8   106,888   19.3   105,585   19.3   115,170   22.3 
   Total commercial loans
  440,071   52.4   301,030   55.5   304,404   55.1   306,949   56.2   314,381   60.8 
Agricultural real estate
  38,983   4.6   9,866   1.8   11,354   2.1   1,201   0.2   1,281   0.2 
CRE investment
  117,264   14.0   73,410   13.5   76,618   13.9   76,773   14.1   62,857   12.2 
Construction & land development
  37,754   4.5   22,286   4.1   21,791   3.9   26,964   4.9   24,612   4.8 
   Total CRE loans
  194,001   23.1   105,562   19.4   109,763   19.9   104,938   19.2   88,750   17.2 
Residential construction
  10,288   1.2   7,445   1.4   7,957   1.4   7,670   1.4   5,961   1.2 
Residential first mortgage
  141,255   16.8   86,202   15.9   85,588   15.5   79,543   14.6   63,156   12.2 
Residential junior mortgage
  48,929   5.8   39,026   7.2   39,352   7.1   40,928   7.5   38,082   7.4 
   Total residential real estate loans
  200,472   23.8   132,673   24.5   132,897   24.0   128,141   23.5   107,199   20.8 
Retail & other
  6,002   0.7   2,859   0.6   5,537   1.0   5,680   1.1   6,662   1.2 
Total loans
 $840,546   100.0 % $542,124   100.0 % $552,601   100.0 % $545,708   100.0 % $516,992   100.0 %
 
39
 

 

 
Total commercial and total CRE loans combined were 75.5% at June 30, 2013 compared to 74.9% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2012.  Mid-Wisconsin had a higher proportion of CRE loans, thus post-merger total CRE rose to 23.1% at June 30, 2013 compared to 19.9% at December 31, 2012 while total commercial loans declined to 52.4% versus 55.1% for the respective periods.  All commercial loans (commercial and CRE combined) are considered to have more inherent risk of default than residential mortgage or retail loans, in part because the commercial balance per borrower is typically larger than that for residential and mortgage loans, implying higher potential losses on an individual customer basis, and the underlying dependence of the commercial borrower’s success on many influences such as health of the economy, real estate values, and efficient business practices.
 
Total commercial loans were 52.4% of total loans at June 30, 2013.  The increase in commercial loan balances from June 2012 to June 2013 has resulted primarily from the acquisition, but also renewed loan demand from business borrowers based on cautious optimism for improving economic conditions versus a year ago.   The increase in agricultural production loans was almost entirely the result of the acquisition with the central region of the state having a strong farming base.  All commercial loan segments include a diverse range of industries. The credit risk related to commercial and industrial loans, agricultural production loans, and owner-occupied CRE loans is largely influenced by general economic conditions and the resulting impact on a borrower’s operations, or on the value of underlying collateral, if any.
 
Total CRE loans were 23.1% of total loans at June 30, 2013.  CRE investment loans comprised 14.0% of the portfolio at June 30, 2013 compared to 13.9% at December 31, 2012.  The CRE investment loan classification primarily includes commercial-based mortgage loans that are secured by non-owner occupied, nonfarm/nonresidential real estate properties, and multi-family residential properties. The increase in agricultural real estate loans (at 4.6% of total loans versus 2.1% at June 30, 2013 and year end 2012, respectively) was almost entirely the result of the acquisition with the central region of Wisconsin having a strong farming base.  Construction and land development loans were 4.5% at June 30, 2013 compared to 3.9% December 31, 2012.  Loans in this classification provide financing for the development of commercial income properties, multi-family residential development, and land designated for future development. Credit risk on these types of loans is controlled by making loans in familiar markets, reviewing the merits of individual projects, controlling loan structure, and monitoring the progress of projects through the analysis of construction advances.  This category has been decreasing as Nicolet has limited new lending to reduce its credit exposure and the acquisition did not significantly impact this category.  Lending in this segment has been focused on loans that are secured by commercial income-producing properties as opposed to speculative real estate development. Credit risk on both CRE investment loans and construction and land development loans is managed by employing sound underwriting guidelines, lending primarily to borrowers in local markets, periodically evaluating the underlying collateral, and formally reviewing the borrower’s financial soundness and relationships on an ongoing basis.
 
Residential construction loans were 1.2% at June 30, 2013 compared to 1.4% at December 31, 2012 representing a continued downward trend in these types of loans.
 
Residential first mortgage real estate loans increased slightly from 15.5% at December 31, 2012 to 16.8% largely as a result of acquired balances.   Residential first mortgage loans include conventional first-lien home mortgages and exclude loans held for sale in the secondary market. Since early 2012, Nicolet has retained specific high quality residential mortgages, in part as an alternative to investing in greater volumes of mortgage-backed securities.  Residential junior mortgage real estate loans increased slightly in balance but declined as a percent of loans from 7.1% at December 31, 2012 to 5.8% of loans at June 30, 2013.  Residential junior mortgage real estate loans consist of home equity lines and term loans secured by junior mortgage liens. While Nicolet has not experienced significant losses in the residential real estate category, if declines in market values that have occurred in the residential real estate markets worsen, particularly in Nicolet’s market area, the value of collateral securing its real estate loans could decline further, which could cause an increase in the provision for loan losses. In light of the uncertainty that exists in the economy and credit markets, there can be no guarantee that Nicolet will not experience additional deterioration resulting from a downturn in credit performance by its residential real estate loan customers. As part of its management of originating residential mortgage loans, the vast majority of Nicolet’s long-term, fixed-rate residential real estate mortgage loans are sold in the secondary market without retaining the servicing rights. At June 30, 2013, $3.1 million of residential mortgages were held for resale to the secondary market, compared to $7.3 million at December 31, 2012.
 
Retail and other loans totaled $6.0 million at June 30, 2013, an increase of $0.5 million since December 31, 2012, and represented 0.7% and 1.0% of total loans, respectively. Loans in this classification include predominantly short-term and other personal installment loans not secured by real estate. The decline in retail and other loans is largely a result of consumers preferring home equity-based loans over consumer installment loans, as well as the uncertain and difficult economic conditions reducing consumer demand for leverage in general.  Credit risk is primarily controlled by reviewing the creditworthiness of the borrowers, monitoring payment histories, and taking appropriate collateral and guaranty positions.
 
40
 

 

 
Factors that are important to managing overall credit quality are sound loan underwriting and administration, systematic monitoring of existing loans and commitments, effective loan review on an ongoing basis, early problem loan identification and remedial action to minimize losses, an adequate ALLL, and sound nonaccrual and charge-off policies. An active credit risk management process is used for commercial loans to further ensure that sound and consistent credit decisions are made. The credit management process is regularly reviewed and the process has been modified over the past several years to further strengthen the controls.
 
The loan portfolio is widely diversified by types of borrowers, industry groups, and market areas. Significant loan concentrations are considered to exist for a financial institution when there are amounts loaned to multiple numbers of borrowers engaged in similar activities that would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. At June 30, 2013, no significant industry concentrations existed in Nicolet’s portfolio in excess of 25% of total loans. Nicolet has also developed guidelines to manage its exposure to various types of concentration risks.
 
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
 
Credit risks within the loan portfolio are inherently different for each loan type. Credit risk is controlled and monitored through the use of lending standards, a thorough review of potential borrowers, and on-going review of loan payment performance. Active asset quality administration, including early problem loan identification and timely resolution of problems, aids in the management of credit risk and minimization of loan losses.
 
The ALLL is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense to appropriately provide for potential credit losses in the existing loan portfolio. Loans are charged against the ALLL when management believes that the collection of principal is unlikely. The level of the ALLL represents management’s estimate of an amount of reserves that provides for estimated probable credit losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. To assess the ALLL, an allocation methodology is applied by Nicolet which focuses on evaluation of qualitative and environmental factors, including but not limited to: (i) evaluation of facts and issues related to specific loans; (ii) management’s ongoing review and grading of the loan portfolio; (iii) consideration of historical loan loss and delinquency experience on each portfolio segment; (iv) trends in past due and nonperforming loans; (v) the risk characteristics of the various loan segments; (vi) changes in the size and character of the loan portfolio; (vii) concentrations of loans to specific borrowers or industries; (viii) existing and forecasted economic conditions; (ix) the fair value of underlying collateral; and (x) other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses. Nicolet’s methodology reflects guidance by regulatory agencies to all financial institutions.
 
At June 30, 2013, the ALLL was $7.7 million, an increase of $0.6 million since December 31, 2012 and $0.2 million since March 31, 2013.  The ALLL as a percentage of total loans was 0.91% at June 30, 2013.  This is a decline from 1.39% at March 31, 2013 and 1.29% at December 31, 2012.  This was largely the result of the acquisition, as loans are recorded directly at their estimated fair value (inclusive of credit-related marks) and no addition to the allowance for loan losses is recorded at consummation.  Loss history on the acquired loans will be developed as charge offs occur and an allocation will be made for these loans in future periods as or if needed.  The provision for loan losses for the first six months of 2013 was $2.0 million compared to $2.4 million for the same period in 2012.  Gross charge-offs were $1.4 million for the first six months of 2013 compared to $2.3 million for the first six months of 2012.  Recoveries were $31,000 and $55,000 for the two periods, respectively. As a result, net charge-offs for the first six months of 2013 were $1.4 million compared to $2.2 million for the comparable period in 2012.  Commercial and industrial and CRE investment loan charge offs increased compared to 2012 while all other categories saw improvement.  Loans charged off are subject to continuous review, and specific efforts are taken to achieve maximum recovery of principal, accrued interest, and related expenses.  The level of the provision for loan losses is directly correlated to the assessment of the adequacy of the allowance, including, but not limited to, consideration of the amount of net charge-offs, loan growth, levels of nonperforming loans, and trends in the risk profile of the loan portfolio.
 
The ALLL was 43.53% and 98.63% of nonperforming assets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Issues impacting asset quality over the past few years have included historically depressed economic factors, such as weakened commercial and residential real estate markets, volatile energy prices, heightened unemployment, and depressed consumer confidence, leading to long resolution periods at low returns. Declining collateral values significantly contributed to elevated levels of nonperforming loans, net charge-offs, and ALLL. Nicolet pursued rigorous workout and resolution plans on problem credits and implemented enhanced underwriting and credit monitoring, particularly in 2010 and 2011. As a result, asset quality stabilized during 2012 and continues to improve in 2013.
 
Nicolet’s management allocates the ALLL by pools of risk within each loan portfolio segment. The allocation methodology consists of the following components. First, a specific reserve for the estimated collateral shortfall is established for all loans determined to be impaired. The specific reserve in the ALLL is equal to the aggregate collateral shortfall calculated from the impairment analysis. Loans measured for impairment include nonaccrual loans, troubled debt-restructurings (“restructured loans”), or other loans determined to be impaired by management. Second, Nicolet’s management allocates ALLL with historical loss rates by loan segment. The loss factors applied in the methodology are periodically re-evaluated and adjusted to reflect changes in historical loss levels on an annual basis. Lastly, management allocates ALLL to the remaining loan portfolio using the qualitative factors mentioned above. Consideration is given to those current qualitative or environmental factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses as of the evaluation date to differ from the historical loss experience of each loan segment.
 
41
 

 

 
At June 30, 2013, the largest portion of the ALLL is allocated to construction and land development loans at $3.3 million, representing 43.5% of the ALLL (compared to 36.2% allocated to this segment at December 31, 2012), and commensurate with risks in this segment, past loss history and nonaccrual activity. Owner-occupied CRE, CRE investment, and residential first mortgage loans all show significant increase in nonperforming levels, however, the majority of the increase was due to acquired loans which have been marked to fair value and did not require additional allowance at June 30, 2013.  At June 30, 2013, $10.6 million of the $14.3 million total nonaccrual loans were acquired loans, thus the remaining $3.7 million are originated nonaccrual loans, down $3.3 million from the $7.0 million nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2012.
 
Management performs ongoing intensive analyses of its loan portfolio to allow for early identification of customers experiencing financial difficulties, maintains prudent underwriting standards, understands the economy in its markets, and considers the trend of deterioration in loan quality in establishing the level of the ALLL.
 
Consolidated net income and stockholders’ equity could be affected if Nicolet’s management’s estimate of the ALLL necessary to cover expected losses is subsequently materially different, requiring a change in the level of provision for loan losses to be recorded. While management uses currently available information to recognize losses on loans, future adjustments to the ALLL may be necessary based on newly received appraisals, updated commercial customer financial statements, rapidly deteriorating customer cash flow, and changes in economic conditions that affect Nicolet’s customers. As an integral part of their examination process, federal regulatory agencies also review the ALLL. Such agencies may require additions to the ALLL or may require that certain loan balances be charged-off or downgraded into criticized loan categories when their credit evaluations differ from those of management based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
 
Table 9: Loan Loss Experience
                     
   
For the three months ended,
 
(in thousands)
 
June 30,
2013
  
March 31,
2013
  
December 31,
2012
  
September 30,
2012
  
June 30,
2012
 
Allowance for loan losses (ALLL):
               
Balance at beginning of period
 $7,540  $7,120  $6,491  $6,045  $5,973 
                      
Provision for loan losses
  975   975   975   975   1,125 
Charge offs
  876   567   671   552   1,077 
Recoveries
  19   12   325   23   24 
Net charge offs
  857   555   346   529   1,053 
Balance at end of period
 $7,658  $7,540  $7,120  $6,491  $6,045 
                      
Net loan charge offs:
                    
Commercial & industrial
 $(16) $470  $164  $48  $66 
Agricultural production
               
Owner-occupied CRE
  56   55   (291)  300   666 
Agricultural real estate
        1       
CRE investment
  639      (27)  150    
Construction & land development
  36      406   (17)  176 
Residential construction
           1   30 
Residential first mortgage
  44   36   45   48   64 
Residential junior mortgage
  88   (6)  47   (1)  13 
Retail & other
  10      1      38 
Total net loans charged off
 $857  $555  $346  $529  $1,053 
                      
ALLL to total loans
  0.91 %  1.39 %  1.29 %  1.19 %  1.17 %
ALLL to net charge offs
  223.40 %  339.64 %  514.45 %  306.76 %  143.52 %
Net charge offs to average loans, annualized
  0.49 %  0.41 %  0.25 %  0.40 %  0.83 %
 
The allocation of the ALLL for each of the past five periods is based on Nicolet’s estimate of loss exposure by category of loans is shown in Table 10.
 
42
 

 

 
Table 10: Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
              
(in thousands)
 
June 30,
2013
  
% of Loan
Type to
Total
Loans
  
December 31, 2012
  
% of Loan
Type to
Total
Loans
 
ALLL allocation
            
Commercial & industrial
 $1,685   29.3 % $1,969   35.7 %
Agricultural production
  5   1.6   -   0.1 
Owner-occupied CRE
  1,217   21.5   1,069   19.3 
Agricultural real estate
  12   4.6   -   2.1 
CRE investment                                   
  183   14.0   337   13.9 
Construction & land development
  3,346   4.5   2,580   3.9 
Residential construction
  173   1.2   137   1.4 
Residential first mortgage
  733   16.8   685   15.5 
Residential junior mortgage
  287   5.8   312   7.1 
Retail & other                                   
  17   0.7   31   1.0 
Total ALLL                                   
 $7,658   100.0 % $7,120   100.0 %
ALLL category as a percent of total ALLL:
                
Commercial & industrial
  22.0 %      27.7 %    
Agricultural production
  0.1       -     
Owner-occupied CRE
  15.9       15.0     
Agricultural real estate
  0.2       -     
CRE investment                                   
  2.4       4.7     
Construction & land development
  43.5       36.2     
Residential construction
  2.3       1.9     
Residential first mortgage
  9.6       9.6     
Residential junior mortgage
  3.8       4.4     
Retail & other                                   
  0.2       0.5     
Total ALLL                                   
  100.0 %      100.0 %    
 
Impaired Loans and Nonperforming Assets
 
As part of its overall credit risk management process, Nicolet’s management has been committed to an aggressive problem loan identification philosophy. This philosophy has been implemented through the ongoing monitoring and review of all pools of risk in the loan portfolio to ensure that problem loans are identified early and the risk of loss is minimized.
 
Nonperforming loans are considered one indicator of potential future loan losses. Nonperforming loans are defined as nonaccrual loans, including those defined as impaired under current accounting standards, and loans 90 days or more past due but still accruing interest. Loans measured for impairment include significant nonaccrual loans, troubled debt-restructurings (“restructured loans”), or other loans determined to be impaired by management. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments. Additionally, whenever management becomes aware of facts or circumstances that may adversely impact the collectability of principal or interest on loans, it is management’s practice to place such loans on nonaccrual status immediately. Previously accrued and uncollected interest on such loans is reversed, amortization of related loan fees is suspended, and income is recorded only to the extent that interest payments are subsequently received in cash after a determination has been made that the principal balance of the loan is collectible. If collectability of the principal is in doubt, payments received are applied to loan principal.
 
Nonperforming loans were $14.3 million and $7.0 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  This balance included $10.6 million of nonperforming loans acquired in the merger representing a net decline of $3.3 million in nonperforming originated loans.   This continues the improving trend as a result of Nicolet’s aggressive workout efforts over the past three years.
 
The level of potential problem loans is another predominant factor in determining the relative level of risk in the loan portfolio and in determining the adequacy of the ALLL. Potential problem loans are generally defined by management to include loans rated as Substandard by management but that are in performing status; however, there are circumstances present which might adversely affect the ability of the borrower to comply with present repayment terms. The decision of management to include performing loans in potential problem loans does not necessarily mean that Nicolet expects losses to occur, but that management recognizes a higher degree of risk associated with these loans. The loans that have been reported as potential problem loans are predominantly commercial loans covering a diverse range of businesses and real estate property types.
 
43
 

 

 
Potential problem loans totaled $16.2 million (or 1.9% of total loans) at June 30, 2013 and $11.6 million (or 2.1% of total loans) at December 31, 2012.  Potential problem loans require a heightened management review of the pace at which a credit may deteriorate, the duration of asset quality stress, and uncertainty around the magnitude and scope of economic stress that may be felt by Nicolet’s customers and on underlying real estate values.
 
OREO increased to $3.4 million at June 30, 2013 from $0.2 million at December 31, 2012. The increase was related to one originated loan which had been on nonaccrual and was taken into possession in the first quarter of 2013 with the remaining balance of $1.7 million being acquired in the merger.  Total nonperforming assets increased from $7.2 million at December 31, 2012 to $17.7 million at June 30, 2013.   The increase in nonperforming assets included acquired loans with a balance of $10.6 million at June 30, 2013.    Nicolet’s management actively seeks to ensure properties held are monitored to minimize Nicolet’s risk of loss. Evaluations of the fair market value of the OREO properties are done quarterly and valuation adjustments, if necessary, are recorded in Nicolet’s consolidated financial statements.
 
Table 11: Nonperforming Assets
 
                     
(in thousands)
 
June 30,
2013
  
March 31,
2013
  
December 31,
2012
  
September 30,
2012
  
June 30,
2012
 
Nonaccrual loans considered impaired:
               
Commercial & industrial
 $4  $93  $784  $3,986  $4,088 
Agricultural production
  22             
Owner-occupied CRE
  3,546   1,857   1,960   354   389 
Agricultural real estate
  611             
CRE investment
  5,546         380   544 
Construction & land development
  790      2,560   8,558   8,531 
Residential construction
           397   1,200 
Residential first mortgage
  3,394   628   1,580   1,326   396 
Residential junior mortgage
  257            36 
Retail & other
  135   149   142   151   151 
Total nonaccrual loans considered impaired
  14,307   2,727   7,026   15,152   15,335 
Impaired loans still accruing interest
               
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
               
Total nonperforming loans
 $14,307  $2,727  $7,026  $15,152  $15,335 
CRE investment
 $360  $121  $71  $393  $393 
Owner-occupied CRE
  604             
Construction & land development
  1,925   1,917   17   19   44 
Residential real estate owned
  471      105   205   453 
OREO
  3,360   2,038   193   617   890 
Total nonperforming assets
 $17,667  $4,765  $7,219  $15,769  $16,225 
Total restructured loans accruing
               
Ratios
                    
Nonperforming loans to total loans
  1.7 %  0.5 %  1.3 %  2.8 %  3.0 %
Nonperforming assets to total loans plus OREO
  2.09 %  0.88 %  1.31 %  2.89 %  3.13 %
Nonperforming assets to total assets
  1.62 %  0.70 %  0.97 %  2.46 %  2.42 %
ALLL to nonperforming assets
  43.35 %  158.24 %  98.63 %  41.16 %  37.27 %
ALLL to total loans at end of year
  0.91 %  1.39 %  1.29 %  1.19 %  1.17 %
 
Table 12: Investment Securities Portfolio
                    
   
June 30, 2013
  
December 31, 2012
 
                   
(in thousands)
 
Amortized
Cost
  
Fair
Value
  
% of
Total
  
Amortized
Cost
  
Fair
Value
  
% of
Total
 
U.S. government sponsored enterprises
 $1,000  $1,001   1 % $-  $-   - %
State, county and municipals
  51,742   52,340   40 %  31,642  $32,687   58 %
Mortgage-backed securities
  73,581   73,263   57 %  19,876   20,668   37 %
Corporate debt securities
  220   220   - %  -   -   - %
Equity securities
  1,576   3,164   2 %  1,624   2,546   5 %
Total
 $128,119  $129,988   100 % $53,142  $55,901   100 %
 
44
 

 

 
At June 30, 2013 the total carrying value of investment securities was $130.0 million, up from $55.9 million at December 31, 2012, and represented 11.9% and 7.5% of total assets at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. As part of the merger, securities with a fair value of $119 million were acquired and as of June 30, 2013 approximately $44 million had been sold in conjunction with planned reductions.
 
At June 30, 2013, the securities portfolio did not contain securities of any single issuer that were payable from and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority where the aggregate carrying value of such securities exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity.
 
In addition to securities available for sale, Nicolet had other investments of $7.5 million and $5.2 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, consisting of capital stock in the Federal Reserve and the FHLB (required as members of the Federal Reserve Bank System and the Federal Home Loan Bank System), as well as equity investments in other private companies. The FHLB and Federal Reserve investments are “restricted” in that they can only be sold back to the respective institutions or another member institution at par, and are thus, not liquid, have no ready market or quoted market value, and are carried at cost. The investments in private companies have no quoted market prices, and are carried at cost less other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) charges, if any. Nicolet’s management evaluates all these other investments periodically for impairment, considering financial condition and other available relevant information. There were no OTTI charges recorded in 2012 or year to date 2013.
 
Table 13: Investment Securities Portfolio Maturity Distribution
 
   
As of June 30, 2013
 
   
Within
One Year
  
After One
but Within
Five Years
  
After Five
but Within
Ten Years
  
After
Ten Years
  
Mortgage-
related
and Equity
Securities
  
Total
Amortized
Cost
  
Total
Fair
Value
Amount
 
   
Amount
  
Yield
  
Amount
  
Yield
  
Amount
  
Yield
  
Amount
  
Yield
  
Amount
  
Yield
  
Amount
  
Yield
 
(in thousands)
                                       
U.S. government sponsored enterprises
 $   % $1,000   0.3% $   % $   % $   % $1,000   0.3% $1,001 
State and county municipals (1)
  5,263   3.3   37,268   2.3   8,835   1.7   375   4.1         51,741   4.0   52,340 
Corporate debt securities
                    220   9.9         220   9.9   220 
Mortgage-backed securities
                          73,581   1.7   73,581   1.7   73,263 
Equity securities
                          1,576      1,576      3,164 
Total amortized cost
 $5,263   3.3 % $38,268   2.2 % $8,835   1.7 % $595   6.2 % $75,157   1.7 % $128,118   2.6 % $129,988 
Total fair value and carrying value
 $5,320      $39,124      $8,522      $595      $76,427              $129,988 
 

(1)
The yield on tax-exempt investment securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34% adjusted for the disallowance of interest expense.
 
Deposits
 
Deposits represent Nicolet’s largest source of funds. Nicolet competes with other bank and nonbank institutions for deposits, as well as with a growing number of non-deposit investment alternatives available to depositors, such as mutual funds, money market funds, annuities, and other brokerage investment products. Challenges to deposit growth include price changes on deposit products given movements in the rate environment and other competitive pricing pressures, and customer preferences regarding higher-costing deposit products or non-deposit investment alternatives. Included in total deposits in Table 14 are brokered deposits of $61.9 million at June 30, 2013 and $32.6 million at December 31, 2012.
 
Table 14: Deposits
 
   
June 30, 2013
  
December 31, 2012
 
(in thousands)
 
Amount
  
% of
Total
  
Amount
  
% of
Total
 
Demand
 $150,460   16.6% $108,234   17.6%
Money market and NOW accounts
  387,377   42.7 %  322,507   52.3 %
Savings
  90,202   9.9 %  46,907   7.6 %
Time
  280,044   30.8 %  138,445   22.5 %
Total deposits
 $908,083   100.0 % $616,093   100.0 %
 
45
 

 

 
Total deposits were $908 million at June 30, 2013, an increase of $292 million since December 31, 2012, with $346 million of deposits from Mid-Wisconsin at acquisition.  The decline of $54 million in deposits mirrors seasonality within the customer base with deposits typically seen.  On average for the quarter, total deposits were $699 million, an increase of $176 million over 2012 averages, which includes two months of average deposit balances from merged activity.   The mix of average deposits continues to be impacted by a continued shift in customer preferences, predominantly away from time deposits.
 
Table 15: Average Deposits
 
   
For the six months ended,
 
   
June 30, 2013
 
June 30, 2012
 
(in thousands)
 
Amount
 
% of
Total
 
Amount
 
% of
Total
 
Demand
 $110,189   15.8% $74,719   14.3%
Money market and NOW accounts
  340,787   48.8 %  253,982   48.6 %
Savings
  64,602   9.2 %  27,694   5.3 %
Time
  183,238   26.2 %  166,407   31.8 %
Total
 $698,816   100.0 % $522,802   100.0 %
 
Table 16: Maturity Distribution of Certificates of Deposit
         
(in thousands)
 
June 30, 2013
 
3 months or less
 
$
84,217
 
Over 3 months through 6 months
   
32,448
 
Over 6 months through 12 months
   
74,532
 
Over 12 months
   
88,847
 
         
Total
 
$
280,044
 
 
Other Funding Sources
 
Other funding sources, which include short-term and long-term borrowings, were $70.3 million and $45.4 million at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Short-term borrowings, consisting mainly of customer repurchase agreements and FHLB advances maturing in less than three months, totaled $33.2 million at June 30, 2013 and $4.0 million at December 31, 2012. Long-term borrowings include a joint venture note and FHLB advances, totaling $25.0 million at June 30, 2013 compared to $35.2 million at December 31, 2012, attributable to scheduled principal payments on the joint venture note payable and repayment of $10 million of longer term FHLB advances during first quarter 2013 (with a prepayment penalty of $96,000 recorded in other expense).  At acquisition, $48 million of short and long term debt (excluding subordinated debentures) was assumed and then paid off by June 30, 2013.  FHLB advances acquired in the Mid-Wisconsin transaction were marked at fair value assuming immediate payoff; however, they were repaid later in the second quarter, with the most notable result being a $0.2 million ‘recovery’ of prepayment penalty recorded in other expense.   Junior subordinated debentures are another long-term funding source.  Junior subordinated debentures of $6.2 million were issued in July 2004 in connection with the $6 million of trust preferred securities. Acquired junior subordinated debentures of $10.3 million in connection with $10 million of trust preferred securities were assumed in the merger and subsequently recorded at the fair market value of $5.8 million.  Further information regarding these junior subordinated debentures is located in Note 9 of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Obligations
 
As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Nicolet had the following commitments that did not appear on its balance sheet:
 
Table 17: Commitments
 
   
June 30,
  
December 31,
 
   
2013
  
2012
 
(in thousands)
      
Commitments to extend credit — Fixed and variable rate
 $232,629  $178,676 
Standby and irrevocable letters of credit-fixed rate
  7,582   4,050 
 
46
 

 

 
Contractual Obligations
 
Nicolet is party to various contractual obligations requiring the use of funds as part of its normal operations. Most of these obligations are routinely refinanced into similar replacement obligations. However, renewal of these obligations is dependent on its ability to offer competitive interest rates, liquidity needs, or availability of collateral for pledging purposes supporting the long-term advances.
 
At the completion of the construction of Nicolet’s headquarters building in 2005 and as part of a joint venture investment related to the building, Nicolet and the other joint venture partners guaranteed a joint venture note to finance certain costs of the building. This note is secured by the building, bears a fixed rate of 5.81% and requires monthly principal and interest payments until its maturity on June 1, 2016. The balance of this joint venture note was $10.0 million and $10.2 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
 
Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity
 
Liquidity management refers to the ability to ensure that cash is available in a timely and cost-effective manner to meet cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers and to meet other commitments as they fall due, including the ability to pay dividends to shareholders, service debt, invest in subsidiaries, repurchase common stock, and satisfy other operating requirements.
 
Funds are available from a number of basic banking activity sources including the core deposit base, the repayment and maturity of loans, investment securities sales, and sales of brokered deposits. All investment securities are classified as available for sale and are reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet. Approximately $60 million of the $130 million investment securities portfolio on hand at June 30, 2013 was pledged to secure public deposits, short-term borrowings, repurchase agreements and for other purposes as required by law. Other funding sources available include short-term borrowings, federal funds purchased, and long-term borrowings.
 
Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were approximately $36 million and $82 million, respectively. The increased cash and cash equivalents at year end compared to historical levels were predominantly due to strong customer deposit growth outpacing the loan demand.  These levels returned to more historical levels during the first quarter.  Nicolet’s liquidity resources were sufficient as of June 30, 2013 to fund loans and to meet other cash needs as necessary.
 
Interest Rate Sensitivity Gap Analysis
 
Table 18 represents a schedule of Nicolet’s assets and liabilities repricing over various time intervals. The primary market risk faced by Nicolet is interest rate risk. The static gap analysis starts with contractual repricing information for assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet instruments. These items are then combined with repricing estimations for administered rate (interest-bearing demand deposits, savings, and money market accounts) and non-rate related products (demand deposit accounts, other assets, and other liabilities) to create a baseline repricing balance sheet. In addition to the contractual information, residential mortgage whole loan products and mortgage-backed securities are adjusted based on industry estimates of prepayment speeds that capture the expected prepayment of principal above the contractual amount based on how far away the contractual coupon is from market coupon rates. At the indicated time intervals the cumulative maturity gap was within Nicolet’s established guidelines of not greater than +25% or -25%.
 
47
 

 

 
Table 18: Interest Rate Sensitivity Gap Analysis
 
   
June 30, 2013
 
(in thousands)
 
0-90 Days
  
91-180
Days
  
181-365
Days
  
1-5 years
  
Beyond
5 Years
  
Total
 
Earning Assets:
                  
Loans
 $365,528  $76,137  $43,979  $285,395  $61,849  $832,888 
Securities at fair value
  4,387   10,694   3,619   60,628   50,660   129,988 
Other earnings assets
  31,777            7,531   39,308 
Total
 $401,692  $86,831  $47,598  $346,023  $120,040  $1,002,184 
                          
Cumulative rate sensitive assets
 $401,692  $488,523  $536,121  $882,144  $1,002,184     
                          
Interest-bearing liabilities
                        
Interest bearing deposits (1)
 $411,901  $77,936  $29,046  $88,017  $150,723  $757,623 
Borrowings
  33,398   1,908   3,735   14,210   5,020   58,271 
Subordinated debentures
  1,504   1,504   3,007   6,014      12,029 
Total
 $446,803  $81,348  $35,788  $108,241  $155,743  $827,923 
                          
Cumulative interest sensitive liabilities
 $446,803  $528,151  $563,939  $672,180  $827,923     
                          
Interest sensitivity gap
 $(45,111) $5,483  $11,810  $237,782  $(35,703)    
                          
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap
 $(45,111) $(39,628) $(27,818) $209,964  $174,261     
Cumulative ratio of rate sensitive assets to rate sensitive liabilities
  90 %  92 %  95 %  131 %  121 %    
 

(1)
The interest rate sensitivity assumptions for savings accounts, money market accounts, and interest-bearing demand deposits accounts are based on current and historical experiences regarding portfolio retention and interest rate repricing behavior. Based on these experiences, a portion of these balances are considered to be long-term and fairly stable and are, therefore, included in the “1-5 Years” and “Beyond 5 Years” categories.
 
In order to limit exposure to interest rate risk, management monitors the liquidity and gap analysis on a monthly basis and adjusts pricing, term and product offerings when necessary to stay within applicable guidelines and maximize the effectiveness of asset/liability management.
 
Along with the static gap analysis, Nicolet’s management also estimates the effect a gradual change and a sudden change in interest rates could have on expected net interest income through income simulation. The simulation is run using the prime rate as the base with the assumption of rates increasing 100, 200, and 300 bps or decreasing 100, 200 and 300 bps. All rates are increased or decreased parallel to the change in prime rate. The simulation assumes a static mix of assets and liabilities. As a result of the simulation, over a 12-month time period ending June 30, 2013, net interest income was estimated to decrease 6.19% if rates increase 100 bps, and was estimated to decrease 0.33% in a 100 bps declining rate environment assumption.  These results are in line with Nicolet’s increasing interest rate sensitivity position, relatively short loan maturities and level of variable rate loans with interest floors; as rates remain low and asset maturities extend while deposit maturities contract, this position continues to become more liability-sensitive.  These results are based solely on the modeled changes in the market rates and do not reflect the earnings sensitivity that may arise from other factors such as changes in the shape of the yield curve, changes in spreads between key market rates, or changes in consumer or business behavior. Interest rates did increase significantly in June with longer term rates rising over 100 bps and there was not a corresponding rise in deposit rates.  These results also do not include any management action to mitigate potential income variances within the modeled process. The simulation results are one indicator of interest rate risk, and actual net interest income is largely impacted by the allocation of assets, liabilities and product mix. Nicolet’s management continually reviews its interest rate risk position through the Asset/Liability Committee process, and such Committee reports to the full board of directors on a monthly basis.
 
48
 

 

 
Capital
 
Nicolet’s management regularly reviews the adequacy of its capital to ensure that sufficient capital is available for current and future needs and is in compliance with regulatory guidelines. Nicolet’s management actively reviews capital strategies in light of perceived business risks associated with current and prospective earning levels, liquidity, asset quality, economic conditions in the markets served, and level of dividends available to shareholders. Nicolet’s management intends to maintain an optimal capital and leverage mix for growth and for shareholder return.
 
The Small Business Lending Fund (“SBLF”) is a U.S. Treasury program made available to community banks, designed to boost lending to small businesses by providing participating banks with capital and liquidity. In particular, the SBLF program targets commercial, industrial, owner-occupied real-estate and agricultural-based lending to qualifying small businesses, which include businesses with less than $50 million in revenue, and promotes outreach to women-owned, veteran-owned and minority-owned businesses.
 
On September 1, 2011, under the SBLF, Nicolet received $24.4 million from the Treasury for the issuance of 24,400 shares of Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C, with $1,000 per share liquidation value. The annual dividend rate upon funding and for the following nine calendar quarters is 5%, unless there is growth in qualifying small business loans outstanding over a baseline which could reduce the rate to as low as 1% (as determined under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”)), adjusted quarterly. The dividend rate is fixed for the tenth quarter after funding through the end of the first four and one-half years at 7% (unless fixed at a lower rate given increased lending as similarly described above); and finally the dividend rate is fixed at 9% after four and one-half years if the preferred stock is not repaid. Nicolet’s weighted average dividend rate has been 5% between funding and June 30, 2013.  Under the terms of the Agreement, Nicolet is required to provide various information, certifications, and reporting to the Treasury. At December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, Nicolet believes it was in compliance with the requirements set by the Treasury in the Agreement. The preferred stock (under SBLF) qualifies as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes.
 
On April 26, 2013 $9.7 million of common stock was issued as part of the merger with Mid-Wisconsin. Concurrently with the merger, Nicolet also closed a private placement for an aggregate of $2.9 million in proceeds.  Approximately $401,000 in direct stock issuance costs for the merger and private placement were incurred and charged against additional paid in capital.  Despite the additional equity issued the effect of the merger transaction reduced overall capital ratios as a result of the increased asset size; however, minimum capital levels were maintained and Nicolet maintains sufficient regulatory capital for current and future needs.
 
On July 9, 2013 banking regulators issued final guidance on how regulatory capital will be calculated going forward.  Full provisions of these regulations will go into effect beginning in 2015.  Nicolet is determining the effect these regulations will have on future capital needs.
 
A summary of Nicolet’s and Nicolet National Bank’s regulatory capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are presented in the following table.
 
49
 

 

 
Table 19: Capital
 
   
Actual
  
For Capital
Adequacy Purposes
  
To Be Well
Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions (2)
 
(in thousands)
 
Amount
  
Ratio (1)
  
Amount
  
Ratio
(1)
  
Amount
  
Ratio
(1)
 
As of June 30, 2013:
                  
Nicolet
                  
Total capital
 $112,672   13.2% $68,202   8.0%  N/A   N/A 
Tier I capital
  105,014   12.3%  34,101   4.0%  N/A   N/A 
Leverage
  105,014   10.7%  39,120   4.0%  N/A   N/A 
                          
Nicolet National Bank
                        
Total capital
 $101,855   12.1% $67, 275   8.0% $84,094   10.0 %
Tier I capital
  94,197   11.2%  33,637   4.0%  50,456   6.0 %
Leverage
  94,197   9.8%  38,531   4.0%  48,164   5.0 %
                          
As of December 31, 2012:
                        
Nicolet
                        
Total capital
 $85,738   15.2% $45,098   8.0%  N/A   N/A 
Tier I capital
  78,691   14.0%  22,549   4.0%  N/A   N/A 
Leverage
  78,691   11.0%  28,622   4.0%  N/A   N/A 
                          
Nicolet National Bank
                        
Total capital
 $77,500   14.1% $43,984   8.0% $54,981   10.0 %
Tier I capital
  70,624   12.8%  21,992   4.0%  32,988   6.0 %
Leverage
  70,624   10.1%  27,916   4.0%  34,895   5.0 %
 

 
(1)
The total capital ratio is defined as tier1 capital plus tier 2 capital divided by total risk-weighted assets. The tier 1 capital ratio is defined as tier1 capital divided by total risk-weighted assets. The leverage ratio is defined as tier1 capital divided by the most recent quarter’s average total assets.
 
(2)
Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable at the bank holding company level.
 
50
 

 

 
ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
Not applicable for smaller reporting companies.
 
ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, under the supervision, and with the participation, of our Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15.  Based upon, and as of the date of such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and President and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
We and our subsidiaries may be involved from time to time in various routine legal proceedings incidental to our respective businesses.  Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are currently engaged in any legal proceedings that are expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.
 
ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS
 
Not applicable for smaller reporting company.
 
ITEM 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
 
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
 
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION
 
Not applicable.
 
51
 

 

 
ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS
 
The following exhibits are filed herewith:
 
Exhibit
Number
 Description
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Nicolet Bankshares, Inc., as amended
31.1 Certification of CEO under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 Certification of CFO under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 Certification of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 Certification of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101* Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text.
 
*Indicates information that is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
NICOLET BANKSHARES, INC.
  
  
August 12, 2013/s/ Robert B. Atwell 
 Robert B. Atwell
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
 
August 12, 2013
/s/ Ann K. Lawson
 
 
Ann K. Lawson
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
52