Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
☒ Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2023
OR
☐ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from _______ to _______
Commission File Number 001-39068
METROCITY BANKSHARES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Georgia
47-2528408
(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)
(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)
5114 Buford HighwayDoraville, Georgia
30340
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(770) 455-4989
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of each Exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
MCBS
Nasdaq Global Select Market
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
☐
Accelerated filer
☒
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of May 2, 2023, the registrant had 25,143,675 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued and outstanding.
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
March 31, 2023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I.
Financial Information
Item l.
Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2023 (unaudited) and December 31, 2022
3
Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 and 2022
4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 and 2022
5
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 and 2022
6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 and 2022
7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
9
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
33
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
51
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
52
Part II.
Other Information
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
53
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
54
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5.
Item 6.
Exhibits
Signatures
56
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
March 31,
December 31,
2023
2022
(Unaudited)
Assets:
Cash and due from banks
$
216,167
150,964
Federal funds sold
7,897
28,521
Cash and cash equivalents
224,064
179,485
Equity securities
10,428
10,300
Securities available for sale
19,174
19,245
Loans, less allowance for credit losses of $18,947 and $13,888, respectively
2,993,073
3,041,801
Accrued interest receivable
13,642
13,171
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
17,659
17,493
Premises and equipment, net
15,165
14,257
Operating lease right-of-use asset
8,030
8,463
Foreclosed real estate, net
766
4,328
SBA servicing asset
7,791
7,085
Mortgage servicing asset, net
3,205
3,973
Bank owned life insurance
69,565
69,130
Interest rate derivatives
24,008
28,781
Other assets
12,443
9,727
Total assets
3,419,013
3,427,239
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing demand
577,282
611,991
Interest-bearing
2,066,811
2,054,847
Total deposits
2,644,093
2,666,838
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
375,000
Other borrowings
387
392
Operating lease liability
8,438
8,885
Accrued interest payable
3,681
2,739
Other liabilities
34,453
23,964
Total liabilities
3,066,052
3,077,818
Shareholders' Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized, 25,143,675 and 25,169,709 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively
251
252
Additional paid-in capital
45,044
45,298
Retained earnings
293,139
285,832
Accumulated other comprehensive income
14,527
18,039
Total shareholders' equity
352,961
349,421
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Interest and dividend income:
Loans, including fees
43,982
31,459
Other investment income
1,939
492
44
Total interest income
45,965
31,953
Interest expense:
Deposits
17,376
1,139
FHLB advances and other borrowings
2,356
161
Total interest expense
19,732
1,300
Net interest income
26,233
30,653
Provision for credit losses
104
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
30,549
Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts
449
481
Other service charges, commissions and fees
874
2,159
Gain on sale of residential mortgage loans
1,211
Mortgage servicing income, net
(96)
101
Gain on sale of SBA loans
1,969
1,568
SBA servicing income, net
1,814
1,644
Other income
1,006
Total noninterest income
6,016
7,656
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits
6,366
7,096
Occupancy and equipment
1,214
1,227
Data processing
275
277
Advertising
146
150
Other expenses
2,678
3,429
Total noninterest expense
10,679
12,179
Income before provision for income taxes
21,570
26,026
Provision for income taxes
5,840
6,597
Net income available to common shareholders
15,730
19,429
Earnings per share:
Basic
0.63
0.76
Diluted
0.62
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Net income
Other comprehensive (loss) gain:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available for sale
368
(1,484)
Net changes in fair value of cash flow hedges
(5,134)
7,358
Tax effect
1,254
(1,469)
Other comprehensive (loss) gain
(3,512)
4,405
Comprehensive income
12,218
23,834
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)
Accumulated
Common Stock
Additional
Other
Number of
Paid-in
Retained
Comprehensive
Shares
Amount
Capital
Earnings
Income (Loss)
Total
Three Months Ended:
Balance, January 1, 2023
25,169,709
Stock based compensation expense
298
Repurchase of common stock
(26,034)
(1)
(552)
(553)
Impact of adoption of new accounting standard, net of tax(1)
(3,865)
Other comprehensive loss
Dividends declared on common stock ($0.18 per share)
(4,558)
Balance, March 31, 2023
25,143,675
Balance, January 1, 2022
25,465,236
255
51,559
238,577
(168)
290,223
194
Other comprehensive income
Dividends declared on common stock ($0.15 per share)
(3,841)
Balance, March 31, 2022
51,753
254,165
4,237
310,410
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31,
Cash flow from operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion
705
711
Unrealized (gains) losses recognized on equity securities
(128)
362
(Gain) loss on sale of foreclosed real estate
(547)
15
Proceeds from sales of residential real estate loans
58,198
Gain on sale of residential mortgages
(1,211)
Origination of SBA loans held for sale
(36,969)
(23,391)
Proceeds from sales of SBA loans held for sale
38,938
24,959
(1,969)
(1,568)
Increase in cash value of bank owned life insurance
(435)
(404)
Increase in accrued interest receivable
(471)
408
Increase in SBA servicing rights
(706)
(320)
Decrease in mortgage servicing rights
768
822
Increase in other assets
(33)
(810)
Increase in accrued interest payable
942
Increase in other liabilities
9,410
16,915
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
25,533
94,416
Cash flow from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturities, calls or paydowns of securities available for sale
421
345
(Purchase) redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
(166)
3,895
Decrease (increase) in loans, net
43,673
(102,527)
Purchases of premises and equipment
(1,162)
(26)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed real estate owned
4,109
41
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
(8,000)
Net cash flow provided (used) by investing activities
46,875
(106,272)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Dividends paid on common stock
(4,526)
(3,821)
Repurchases of common stock
(Decrease) increase in deposits, net
(22,745)
119,121
Decrease in other borrowings, net
(5)
(54)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
125,000
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
(125,000)
(120,000)
Net cash flow used by financing activities
(27,829)
(4,754)
Continued to following page.
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
44,579
(16,610)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
441,341
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
424,731
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
Transfer of residential real estate loans to loans held for sale
94,915
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information - Cash paid during the year for:
Interest
18,790
1,297
Income taxes
686
488
8
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2023
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. (“Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Metro City Bank (the “Bank”). The Company owns 100% of the Bank. The “Company” or “our,” as used herein, includes Metro City Bank unless the context indicates that we refer only to MetroCity Bankshares, Inc.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) followed within the financial services industry for interim financial information and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information or notes required for complete financial statements.
The Company principally operates in one business segment, which is community banking.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring items, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements for the interim periods have been included. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts reported in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. These reclassifications did not have a material effect on previously reported net income, shareholders’ equity or cash flows.
Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2023 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2023. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2022.
The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2022, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Company’s 2022 Form 10-K”). Aside from the adoption of ASU 2016-13 (which is further discussed below), there were no new accounting policies or changes to existing policies adopted during the first three months of 2023 which had a significant effect on the Company’s results of operations or statement of financial condition. For interim reporting purposes, the Company follows the same basic accounting policies and considers each interim period as an integral part of an annual period.
Contingencies
Due to the nature of their activities, the Company and its subsidiary are at times engaged in various legal proceedings that arise in the course of normal business, some of which were outstanding as of March 31, 2023. Although the ultimate outcome of all claims and lawsuits outstanding as of March 31, 2023 cannot be ascertained at this time, it is the opinion of management that these matters, when resolved, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
Accounting Standards Adopted in 2023
In January 2023, the Comnpany adopted ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”. This ASU significantly changes how entities measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The standard replaced the incurred loss approach with an expected loss model, referred to as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model. The new standard will apply to financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance-sheet credit exposures, which include, but are not limited to, loans, leases, held-to-maturity securities, loan commitments and financial guarantees. ASU 2016-13 simplifies the accounting for purchased credit-
impaired debt securities and loans and expands the disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s assumptions, models and methods for estimating the allowance for credit losses. In addition, entities will need to disclose the amortized cost balance for each class of financial asset by credit quality indicator, disaggregated by the year of origination. ASU No. 2016-13 was effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2022. Upon adoption, ASU 2016-13 provides for a modified retrospective transition by means of a cumulative effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the period in which the guidance is effective.
The Company adopted ASU 2016-13 and all related subsequent amendments thereto effective January 1, 2023 using the modified retrospective approach. The adoption of this standard resulted in an increase to the allowance for credit losses on loans of $5.1 million and the creation of an allowance for unfunded commitments of $239,000. These one-time cumulative adjustments resulted in a $3.9 million decrease to retained earnings, net of a $1.4 million increase to deferred tax assets.
For available for sale (“AFS”) securities, the new CECL methodology replaces the other-than-temporary impairment model and requires the recognition of an allowance for reductions in a security’s fair value attributable to declines in credit quality, instead of a direct write-down of the security, when a valuation decline is determined to be other-than-temporary. There was no financial impact related to this implementation since the credit risk associated with our securities portfolio is minimal. The Company has made a policy election to exclude accrued interest from the amortized cost basis of AFS securities. Accrued interest receivable for AFS securities totaled $79,000 and $114,000 as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. This accrued interest receivable is included in the “accrued interest receivable” line item on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In January 2023, the Company adopted ASU 2022-02, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures”, which eliminated the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancing and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. This guidance was applied on a prospective basis. Upon adoption of this guidance, the Company no longer establishes a specific reserve for modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty, unless those loans do not share the same risk characteristics with other loans in the portfolio. Provided that is not the case, these modifications are included in their respective cohort and the allowance for credit losses is estimated on a pooled basis consistent with the other loans with similar risk characteristics. See Note 3 below for further details.
The Company has further evaluated other Accounting Standards Updates issued during 2023 to date but does not expect updates other than those summarized above to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The following new accounting policies were adopted during the first quarter of 2023:
Allowance for Credit Losses – Available for Sale Securities
The impairment model for available for sale (“AFS”) securities differs from the CECL approach utilized by HTM debt securities because AFS debt securities are measured at fair value rather than amortized cost. Although ASU 2016-13 replaced the legacy other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) model with a credit loss model, it retained the fundamental nature of the legacy OTTI model. One notable change from the legacy OTTI model is when evaluating whether credit loss exists, an entity may no longer consider the length of time fair value has been less than amortized cost. For AFS debt securities in an unrealized loss position, the Company first assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either criteria is met, the security’s amortized cost basis is written down to fair value through income. For AFS debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment, management considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any impairment that has not been
10
recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income. As of March 31, 2023, the Company determined that the unrealized loss positions in AFS securities were not the result of credit losses, and therefore, an allowance for credit losses was not recorded. See Note 2 below for further details.
Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans
Under the CECL model, the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) on loans is a valuation allowance estimated at each balance sheet date in accordance with GAAP that is deducted from the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loans.
The Company estimates the ACL on loans based on the underlying loans’ amortized cost basis, which is the amount at which the financing receivable is originated or acquired, adjusted for applicable accretion or amortization of premium, discount, and net deferred fees or costs, collection of cash, and charge-offs. In the event that collection of principal becomes uncertain, the Company has policies in place to reverse accrued interest in a timely manner. Therefore, the Company has made a policy election to exclude accrued interest from the measurement of ACL.
Expected credit losses are reflected in the allowance for credit losses through a charge to provision for credit losses. When the Company deems all or a portion of a loan to be uncollectible the appropriate amount is written off and the ACL is reduced by the same amount. Loans are charged off against the ACL when management believes the collection of the principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries of previously charged off amounts, if any, are credited to the ACL when received.
The Company measures expected credit losses of loans on a collective (pool) basis, when the loans share similar risk characteristics. Depending on the nature of the pool of loans with similar risk characteristics, the Company uses the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method and a qualitative approach as discussed further below.
The Company’s methodologies for estimating the ACL consider available relevant information about the collectability of cash flows, including information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The methodologies apply historical loss information, adjusted for loan-specific characteristics, economic conditions at the measurement date, and forecasts about future economic conditions expected to exist through the contractual lives of the loans that are reasonable and supportable, to the identified pools of loans with similar risk characteristics for which the historical loss experience was observed. The Company’s methodologies revert back to historical loss information on a straight-line basis over eight quarters when it can no longer develop reasonable and supportable forecasts.
The Company has identified the following pools of loans with similar risk characteristics for measuring expected credit losses:
Construction and development – Loans in this segment primarily include real estate development loans for which payment is derived from the sale of the property as well as construction projects in which the property will ultimately be used by the borrower. Credit risk is affected by cost overruns, time to sell at an adequate price, and market conditions.
Commercial real estate – Loans in this segment are primarily income-producing properties. The underlying cash flows generated by the properties are adversely impacted by a downturn in the economy as evidenced by increased vacancy rates, which in turn, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment. Management monitors the cash flows of these loans. This loan segment includes farmland loans.
Commercial and industrial – Loans in this segment are made to businesses and are generally secured by assets of the business. Repayment is expected from the cash flows of the business. A weakened economy, and resultant decreased customer spending, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.
Single family residential mortgages – Loans in this segment include loans for residential real estate. Loans in this segment are dependent on credit quality of the individual borrower. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates will have an effect on the credit quality of this segment.
11
Consumer and other – Loans in this segment are made to individuals and are secured by personal assets, as well as loans for personal lines of credit and overdraft protection. Loans in this segment are dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.
Discounted Cash Flow Method
The Company uses the discounted cash flow method to estimate expected credit losses for each of its loan segments. The Company generates cash flow projections at the instrument level wherein payment expectations are adjusted for estimated prepayment speed, curtailments, time to recovery, probability of default, and loss given default. The modeling of expected prepayment speeds, curtailment rates, and time to recovery are based on benchmark peer data.
The Company uses regression analysis of peer data to determine suitable loss drivers to utilize when modeling lifetime probability of default and loss given default. This analysis also determines how expected probability of default and loss given default will react to forecasted levels of the loss drivers. For all loan pools utilizing the DCF method, the Company uses national data including gross domestic product, unemployment rates and home price indices (residential mortgage loans only) depending on the nature of the underlying loan pool and how well that loss driver correlates to expected future losses.
For all DCF models, management has determined that four quarters represents a reasonable and supportable forecast period and reverts back to a historical loss rate over eight quarters on a straight-line basis. Management leverages economic projections from a reputable and independent third party to inform its loss driver forecasts over the four-quarter forecast period. Other internal and external indicators of economic forecasts are also considered by management when developing the forecast metrics.
The combination of adjustments for credit expectations (default and loss) and timing expectations (prepayment, curtailment, and time to recovery) produces an expected cash flow stream at the instrument level. Instrument effective yield is calculated, net of the impacts of prepayment assumptions, and the instrument expected cash flows are then discounted at that effective yield to produce an instrument-level net present value of expected cash flows (“NPV”). An ACL is established for the difference between the instrument’s NPV and amortized cost basis.
Qualitative Factors
The Company also considers qualitative adjustments to the quantitative baseline discussed above. For example, the Company considers the impact of current environmental factors at the reporting date that did not exist over the period from which historical experience was used. Relevant factors include, but are not limited to, concentrations of credit risk (geographic, large borrower, and industry), local/regional economic trends and conditions, changes in underwriting standards, changes in collateral value, experience and depth of lending staff, trends in delinquencies, and the volume and terms of loans.
Individually Analyzed Loans
Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. For collateral dependent loans where the Company has determined that foreclosure of the collateral is probable, or where the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the Company expects repayment of the loan to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral, the ACL is measured based on the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the amortized cost basis of the loan as of the measurement date. When repayment is expected to be from the operation of the collateral, expected credit losses are calculated as the amount by which the amortized cost basis of the loan exceeds the present value of expected cash flows from the operation of the collateral. When repayment is expected to be from the sale of the collateral, expected credit losses are calculated as the amount by which the amortized costs basis of the loan exceeds the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated cost to sell. The ACL may be zero if the fair value of the collateral at the measurement date exceeds the amortized cost basis of the loan.
12
Allowance for Unfunded Commitments
The Company records an allowance for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments, unless the commitments to extend credit are unconditionally cancelable, through a charge to provision for unfunded commitments in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The ACL on off-balance sheet credit exposures is estimated by loan segment at each balance sheet date under the CECL model using the same methodologies as portfolio loans, taking into consideration the likelihood that funding will occur. The allowance for unfunded commitments is included in Other Liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTE 2 – INVESTMENT SECURITIES
The amortized costs, gross unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair values of securities available for sale as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 are summarized as follows:
Gross
Estimated
Amortized
Unrealized
Fair
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
Obligations of U.S. Government entities and agencies
4,834
States and political subdivisions
8,109
(1,555)
6,554
Mortgage-backed GSE residential
9,338
(1,552)
7,786
22,281
(3,107)
December 31, 2022
5,059
8,121
(1,718)
6,403
9,540
(1,757)
7,783
22,720
(3,475)
The amortized costs and estimated fair values of investment securities available for sale at March 31, 2023 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Securities Available for Sale
Fair Value
Due in one year or less
Due after one year but less than five years
5,697
5,676
Due after five years but less than ten years
379
375
Due in more than ten years
6,867
5,337
As of March 31, 2023, the Company had securities pledged to the Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window with a carrying amount of $14.3 million. There were no securities pledged as of December 31, 2022 to secure borrowing lines, public deposits or repurchase agreements. There were no securities sold during the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.
13
Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, are summarized in the table below.
Twelve Months or Less
Over Twelve Months
1,555
1,552
3,107
14,340
756
3,556
962
2,847
48
541
1,709
7,242
804
4,097
2,671
10,089
At March 31, 2023, the nineteen securities available for sale (11 municipal securities and 8 mortgage-backed securities) with an unrealized loss have depreciated 17.81% from the Company’s amortized cost basis. All of these securities have been in a loss position for greater than twelve months.
The Company does not believe that the securities available for sale that were in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2023 represent a credit loss impairment. As of March 31, 2023, there have been no payment defaults nor do we currently expect any future payment defaults. Furthermore, the Company does not intend to sell these securities, and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investment securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity.
Equity Securities
As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company had equity securities with carrying values totaling $10.4 million and $10.3 million, respectively. The equity securities consist of our investment in a market-rate bond mutual fund that invests in high quality fixed income bonds, mainly government agency securities whose proceeds are designed to positively impact community development throughout the United States. The mutual fund focuses exclusively on providing affordable housing to low- and moderate-income borrowers and renters, including those in Majority Minority Census Tracts.
During the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, we recognized an unrealized gain of $128,000 and an unrealized loss of $362,000, respectively, in net income on our equity securities. These unrealized gains and losses are recorded in Other Expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.
14
NOTE 3 – LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
Major classifications of loans at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 are summarized as follows:
Construction and development
49,209
47,779
Commercial real estate
639,951
657,246
Commercial and industrial
46,208
53,173
Residential real estate
2,285,902
2,306,915
Consumer and other
50
216
Total loans receivable
3,021,320
3,065,329
Unearned income
(9,300)
(9,640)
Allowance for credit losses
(18,947)
(13,888)
Loans, net
The Company is not committed to lend additional funds to borrowers with nonaccrual or restructured loans.
In the normal course of business, the Company may sell and purchase loan participations to and from other financial institutions and related parties. Loan participations are typically sold to comply with the legal lending limits per borrower as imposed by regulatory authorities. The participations are sold without recourse and the Company imposes no transfer or ownership restrictions on the purchaser.
The Company elected to exclude accrued interest receivable from the amortized cost basis of loans disclosed throughout this note. As of March 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, accrued interest receivable for loans totaled $13.6 million and $13.1 million, respectively, and is included in the “accrued interest receivable” line item on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Allowance for Credit Losses
As previously mentioned in Note 1, the Company’s January 1, 2023 adoption of ASU 2016-13 resulted in a significant change to our methodology for estimating the allowance for credit losses since December 31, 2022. As a result of this adoption, the Company recorded a $5.1 million increase to the allowance for credit losses as a cumulative-effect adjustment on January 1, 2023.
A summary of changes in the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 is as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2023
Construction
and
Commercial
Residential
Consumer
Development
Real Estate
and Industrial
and Other
Unallocated
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance
124
2,811
1,326
9,626
1
13,888
Impact of adopting ASU 2016-13
(79)
3,275
(307)
2,166
5,055
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provision expense
Ending balance
45
6,088
1,021
11,792
18,947
Three Months Ended March 31, 2022
100
4,146
4,989
7,717
16,952
(390)
(7)
(159)
(93)
217
93
4,294
4,441
7,624
16,674
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2023, the Company calculated the allowance for credit losses under the incurred loss methodology. The following table presents, by portfolio segment, the balance in the allowance for credit losses disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment measurement method and the related unpaid principal balance in loans under the incurred loss methodology as of December 31, 2022.
Individually evaluated for impairment
249
465
714
Collectively evaluated for impairment
2,562
861
13,174
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality
Total ending allowance balance
Loans:
23,767
1,122
5,037
29,926
47,567
631,031
51,989
2,294,960
3,025,763
Total ending loans balance
654,798
53,111
2,299,997
3,055,689
Impaired Loans
Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, loans were considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it was probable the Company would be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally were not classified as impaired. Management determined the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impaired loans were measured by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the estimated fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The amount of impairment, if any, and any subsequent changes were included in the allowance for credit losses.
16
Impaired loans as of December 31, 2022, by portfolio segment, are as follows. The recorded investment consists of the unpaid total principal balance plus accrued interest receivable.
Unpaid
Recorded
Investment
Principal
With No
With
Related
Balance
Allowance
23,121
1,415
24,536
155
997
1,152
28,313
2,412
30,725
Collateral-Dependent Loans
Collateral-dependent loans are loans where repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying collateral and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment. The estimated credit losses for these loans are based on the collateral’s fair value less selling costs. In most cases, the Company records a partial charge-off to reduce the loan’s carrying value to the collateral’s fair value less selling costs at the time of foreclosure. As of March 31, 2023, there were $23.7 million of collateral-dependent loans which are primarily secured by residential and commercial real estate, as well as equipment. The allowance for credit losses allocated to these loans as of March 31, 2023 was $488,000.
Past Due and Nonaccrual Loans
A primary credit quality indicator for financial institutions is delinquent balances. Delinquencies are updated on a daily basis and are continuously monitored. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status as needed based on repayment status and consideration of accounting and regulatory guidelines. Nonaccrual balances are updated and reported on a daily basis.
The following summarizes the Company’s past due and nonaccrual loans, by portfolio segment, as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
Accruing
Greater than
Financing
Current
30-59 Days
60-89 Days
90 Days
Past Due
Nonaccrual
Receivables
49,046
623,034
12,774
1,569
637,377
45,797
117
218
46,132
2,260,549
9,648
1,941
11,589
7,277
2,279,415
2,978,476
22,539
24,480
9,064
3,012,020
649,552
354
4,892
52,485
310
180
490
136
2,282,089
8,882
3,989
12,871
3,031,909
9,236
4,299
13,715
10,065
17
The following table presents an analysis of nonaccrual loans with and without a related allowance for credit losses as of March 31, 2023:
Loans With a
Loans Without a
Related ACL
Nonaccrual Loans
1,228
341
125
1,321
7,743
All payments received while a loan is on nonaccrual status are applied against the principal balance of the loan. The Company does not recognize interest income while loans are on nonaccrual status.
Credit Quality Indicators
The Company utilizes a ten grade loan risk rating system for its loan portfolio as follows:
Loan grades are monitored regularly and updated as necessary based upon review of repayment status and consideration of periodic updates regarding the borrower’s financial condition and capacity to meet contractual requirements.
18
The following table presents the loan portfolio's amortized cost by loan type, risk rating and year of origination as of March 31, 2023. There were no loans with a risk rating of Doubtful or Loss at March 31, 2023.
Term Loan by Origination Year
Revolving
2021
2020
2019
Prior
Loans
Total Loans
Pass
363
9,296
19,843
1,209
18,092
243
Special Mention
Substandard
Total construction and development
28,770
209,970
113,081
88,402
52,232
114,628
3,600
610,683
1,960
604
1,169
10,812
12,149
24,734
Total commercial real estate
210,574
91,531
63,044
126,777
1,379
16,187
5,434
2,696
3,253
4,206
8,924
42,079
1,373
598
1,354
3,700
331
22
353
Total commercial and industrial
6,807
3,071
4,182
5,582
36,319
782,002
899,623
315,247
69,156
168,902
2,271,249
1,187
1,218
1,192
4,569
8,166
Total residential real estate
900,810
316,465
70,348
173,471
Total consumer and other
Total loans
66,881
1,018,059
1,040,541
412,276
155,666
306,073
12,524
No revolving loans were converted to term loans during the three months ended March 31, 2023.
The following table presents the Company’s loan portfolio by risk rating as of December 31, 2022:
Rating:
628,165
48,848
2,292,568
3,017,364
3,677
3,897
7,574
22,956
366
7,429
30,751
Doubtful
Loss
Loan Modifications to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty.
In January 2023, the Company adopted ASU 2022-02, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures”, which eliminated the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) while enhancing disclosure requirements for certain loan refinancing and restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. This guidance was applied on a prospective basis. Upon adoption of this guidance, the Company no longer establishes a specific reserve for modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty, unless those loans do not share the same risk characteristics with other loans in the portfolio. Provided that is not the case, these modifications are included in their respective cohort and the allowance for credit losses is estimated on a pooled basis consistent with the other loans with similar risk characteristics.
19
Modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty may include interest rate reductions, principal or interest forgiveness, payment deferrals, term extensions, and other actions intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral.
No loan modifications were made to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty during the three months ended March 31, 2023. No charge-offs of previously modified loans were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2023.
NOTE 4 – SBA AND USDA LOAN SERVICING
The Company sells the guaranteed portion of certain SBA and USDA loans it originates and continues to service the sold portion of the loan. The portion of the loans sold are not included in the financial statements of the Company. As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the unpaid principal balances of serviced loans totaled $485.7 million and $465.1 million, respectively.
Activity for SBA loan servicing rights are as follows:
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
Beginning of period
7,038
10,091
Change in fair value
698
304
End of period, fair value
7,736
10,395
Fair value at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 was determined using discount rates ranging from 8.20% to 15.97% and 8.21% to 19.30%, respectively, and prepayment speeds ranging from 12.09% to 17.36% and 13.12% to 17.60%, respectively, depending on the stratification of the specific right. Average default rates are based on the industry average for the applicable NAICS/SIC code.
The aggregate fair market value of the interest only strips included in SBA servicing assets was $55,000 and $47,000 at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Comparable market values and a valuation model that calculates the present value of future cash flows were used to estimate fair value. For purposes of fair value measurement, risk characteristics including product type and interest rate, were used to stratify the originated loan servicing rights.
NOTE 5 – RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOAN SERVICING
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others are not reported as assets. The outstanding principal of these loans at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 was $506.0 million and $526.7 million, respectively.
Activity for mortgage loan servicing rights and the related valuation allowance are as follows:
Mortgage loan servicing rights:
7,747
Additions
413
Amortization expense
(768)
(1,310)
Valuation allowance
75
End of period, carrying value
6,925
Valuation allowance:
163
Additions expensed
Reductions credited to operations
(75)
Direct write-downs
88
20
The fair value of servicing rights was $6.9 million and $7.2 million at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Fair value at March 31, 2023 was determined by using a discount rate of 12.55%, prepayment speeds of 17.99%, and a weighted average default rate of 1.30%. Fair value at December 31, 2022 was determined by using a discount rate of 12.56%, prepayment speeds of 18.63%, and a weighted average default rate of 1.29%.
NOTE 6 – FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES & OTHER BORROWINGS
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 are summarized as follows:
Convertible advance maturing February 13, 2026; fixed rate of 4.184%
50,000
Convertible advance maturing October 26, 2027; fixed rate of 3.530%
25,000
Convertible advance maturing January 25, 2028; fixed rate of 3.243%
Convertible advance maturing February 14, 2028; fixed rate of 3.625%
Convertible advance maturing June 16, 2032; fixed rate of 1.905%
Convertible advance maturing June 23, 2032; fixed rate of 1.950%
100,000
Convertible advance maturing August 6, 2032; fixed rate of 1.892%
Convertible advance maturing October 26, 2032; fixed rate of 3.025%
Convertible advance maturing May 12, 2037; fixed rate of 1.135%
75,000
Total FHLB advances
The FHLB advances outstanding at March 31, 2023 all have a conversion feature that allows the FHLB to call the advances every nine months ($100.0 million) or one year ($275.0 million). At March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company had a line of credit with the FHLB, set as a percentage of total assets, with maximum borrowing capacity of $1.03 billion and $1.01 billion, respectively. The available borrowing amounts are collateralized by the Company’s FHLB stock and pledged residential real estate loans, which totaled $2.27 billion and $2.29 billion at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively.
At March 31, 2023, the Company had unsecured federal funds lines available with correspondent banks of approximately $47.5 million. There were no advances outstanding on these lines at March 31, 2023.
At March 31, 2023, the Company had Federal Reserve Discount Window funds available of approximately $429.0 million. The funds are collateralized by a pool of construction and development, commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans with carrying balances totaling $539.1 million as of March 31, 2023, as well as all of the Company’s municipal and mortgage backed securities. There were no outstanding borrowings on this line as of March 31, 2023.
The Company sells the guaranteed portion of certain SBA loans it originates and continues to service the sold portion of the loan. The Company sometimes retains an interest only strip or servicing fee that is considered to be more than customary market rates. An interest rate strip can result from a transaction when the market rate of the transaction differs from the stated rate on the portion of the loan sold.
The sold portion of SBA loans that have an interest only strip are considered secured borrowings and are included in other borrowings. Secured borrowings at March 31 2023 and December 31, 2022 were $387,000 and $392,000, respectively.
NOTE 7 – OPERATING LEASES
The Company has entered into various operating leases for certain branch locations with terms extending through August 2032. Generally, these leases have initial lease terms of ten years or less. Many of the leases have one or more renewal options which typically are for five years at the then fair market rental rates. We assessed these renewal options using a threshold of reasonably certain. For leases where we were reasonably certain to renew, those option periods were included within the lease term, and therefore, the measurement of the right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and lease liability. None
21
of our leases included options to terminate the lease and none had initial terms of 12 months or less (i.e. short-term leases). Operating leases in which the Company is the lessee are recorded as operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company currently does not have any finance leases.
Operating lease ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset during the lease term and operating lease liabilities represent its obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized at lease commencement based on the present value of the remaining lease payments using a discount rate that represents the Company’s incremental collateralized borrowing rate provided by the FHLB at the lease commencement date. ROU assets are further adjusted for lease incentives, if any. Operating lease expense, which is comprised of amortization of the ROU asset and the implicit interest accreted on the operating lease liability, is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and is recorded in occupancy expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The components of lease cost for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 were as follows:
Operating lease cost
505
Variable lease cost
Short-term lease cost
Sublease income
Total net lease cost
585
549
Future maturities of the Company’s operating lease liabilities are summarized as follows:
Twelve Months Ended:
Lease Liability
March 31, 2024
2,002
March 31, 2025
1,858
March 31, 2026
1,597
March 31, 2027
1,358
March 31, 2028
1,079
After March 31, 2028
1,302
Total lease payments
9,196
Less: interest discount
(758)
Present value of lease liabilities
Supplemental Lease Information
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years)
5.5
Weighted-average discount rate
3.18
%
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases (cash payments)
513
487
Operating cash flows from operating leases (lease liability reduction)
447
416
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for leases entered into during the period
NOTE 8 – INTEREST RATE DERIVATIVES
During 2021 and 2022, the Company entered into fourteen separate interest rate swap agreements with notional amounts totaling $800.0 million. Six of the interest rate swaps are two-year forward three-year term swaps (five-year total
term) where cash settlements begin in October 2023, January 2024 or April 2024. Four of the interest rate swaps are two-year forward two-year term swaps (four-year total term) where cash settlements begin in November 2023 or April 2024. Two of the interest rate swaps are a one-year forward two-year term swap (three-year total term) and a one-year forward three-year term swap (four-year term total) where cash settlements begin in May 2023 or July 2023. The two remaining interest rate swaps are 3-year spot swaps where cash settlements began in June 2022 and December 2022. The swap agreements were designated as cash flow hedges of our deposit accounts that are indexed to the Federal Funds Effective rate. The swaps are determined to be highly effective since inception and therefore no amount of ineffectiveness has been included in net income. The aggregate fair value of the swaps amounted to an unrealized gain of $22.3 million and $26.7 million and an unrealized loss of $1.2 million and $779,000 at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. These unrealized gains and losses are recorded in Interest Rate Derivatives and Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company expects the hedges to remain highly effective during the remaining terms of the swaps.
During October 2021, the Company entered into an interest rate cap agreement with a notional amount of $50.0 million and a cap rate of 2.50%. This interest rate cap is a two-year forward three-year term (five-year total term) where cash settlements begin on November 2023. The interest rate cap was designated as a cash flow hedge of our deposit accounts that are indexed to the Federal Funds Effective rate. The rate cap premium paid by the Company at inception will be amortized on a straight line basis to deposit interest expense over the total term of the interest rate cap agreement. The fair value of the interest rate cap amounted to an unrealized gain of $1.7 million and $2.1 million at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively, and are recorded in Interest Rate Derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Company is exposed to credit related losses in the event of the nonperformance by the counterparties to the interest rate swaps. The Company performs an initial credit evaluation and ongoing monitoring procedures for all counterparties and currently anticipates that all counterparties will be able to fully satisfy their obligation under the contracts. In addition, the Company may require collateral from counterparties in the form of cash deposits in the event that the fair value of the contracts are positive and such fair value for all positions with the counterparty exceeds the credit support thresholds specified by the underlying agreement. Conversely, the Company is required to post cash deposits as collateral in the event the fair value of the contracts are negative and are below the credit support thresholds. At March 31, 2023, there were no cash deposits pledged as collateral by the Company.
Summary information for the interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges is as follows:
As of or for the
Year Ended
Notional Amounts
800,000
Weighted-average pay rate
2.28%
Weighted-average receive rate
4.52%
1.68%
Weighted-average maturity
4.2 years
Weighted-average remaining maturity
3.1 years
3.4 years
Net interest income (expense) income
197
(163)
Summary information for the interest rate caps designated as cash flow hedges is as follows:
Rate Cap Premiums
444
474
Cap Rate
2.50%
5.0 years
3.6 years
3.8 years
Net interest expense
(31)
(124)
23
NOTE 9 – LOAN COMMITMENTS AND RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit written is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. Financial instruments where contract amounts represent credit risk as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 include:
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit
69,030
62,334
Standby letters of credit
6,368
6,303
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments to extend credit includes $69.0 million of unused lines of credit and $6.4 million for standby letters of credit as of March 31, 2023. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty.
Standby letters of credit written are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan commitments to customers.
The Company maintains cash deposits with a financial institution that during the year are in excess of the insured limitation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. If the financial institution were not to honor its contractual liability, the Company could incur losses. Management is of the opinion that there is not material risk because of the financial strength of the institution.
NOTE 10 – FAIR VALUE
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.
Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value
24
measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
The following presents the assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall, and the financial instruments carried on the consolidated balance sheet by caption and by level in the fair value hierarchy, for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded:
Total Gains
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
(Losses)
Assets
Recurring fair value measurements:
Securities available for sale:
Total securities available for sale
Interest only strip
55
61,401
38,348
12,625
Nonrecurring fair value measurements:
Collateral-dependent loans
3,631
(165)
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps
1,170
25
14,186
47
65,411
42,967
12,144
Impaired loans
1,045
229
779
The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value:
Securities, Available for Sale: The Company carries securities available for sale at fair value. For securities where quoted prices are not available (Level 2), the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things. The investments in the Company’s portfolio are generally not quoted on an exchange but are actively traded in the secondary institutional markets.
The Company owns certain SBA investments for which the fair value is determined using Level 3 hierarchy inputs and assumptions as the trading market for such securities was determined to be “not active.” This determination was based on the limited number of trades or, in certain cases, the existence of no reported trades. Discounted cash flows are calculated by a third party using interest rate curves that are updated to incorporate current market conditions, including prepayment vectors and credit risk. During time when trading is more liquid, broker quotes are used to validate the model.
Equity Securities: The Company carries equity securities at fair value. Equity securities are measured at fair value using quoted market prices on nationally recognized and foreign securities exchanges (Level 1).
SBA Servicing Assets and Interest Only Strip: The fair values of the Company’s servicing assets are determined using Level 3 inputs. All separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities are initially measured at fair value initially and at each reporting date and changes in fair value are reported in earnings in the period in which they occur.
The fair values of the Company’s interest-only strips are determined using Level 3 inputs. When the Company sells loans to others, it may hold interest-only strips, which is an interest that continues to be held by the transferor in the securitized receivable. It may also obtain servicing assets or assume servicing liabilities that are initially measured at fair value. Gain or loss on sale of the receivables depends in part on both (a) the previous carrying amount of the financial assets involved in the transfer, allocated between the assets sold and the interests that continue to be held by the transferor based on their relative fair value at the date of transfer, and (b) the proceeds received. To obtain fair values, quoted market prices are used if available. However, quotes are generally not available for interests that continue to be held by the transferor, so the Company generally estimates fair value based on the future expected cash flows estimated using
26
management’s best estimates of the key assumptions — credit losses and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved.
Interest Rate Derivatives: Exchange-traded derivatives are valued using quoted prices and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. However, few classes of derivative contracts are listed on an exchange; thus, the Company’s derivative positions are valued by third parties using their valuation models and confirmed by the Company. Since the model inputs can be observed in a liquid market and the models do not require significant judgement, such derivative contracts are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company’s interest rate derivatives contracts (designated as cash flow hedges) are classified within Level 2.
Under certain circumstances we make adjustments to fair value for our assets and liabilities although they are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis.
Collateral-dependent and impaired loans: Collateral-dependent loans are loans where repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying collateral and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, impaired loans were evaluated and valued at the time the loan was identified as impaired, at the lower of cost or fair value. Fair value for both collateral-dependent and impaired loans are measured based on the value of the collateral securing these loans and are classified at a Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Collateral may include real estate, or business assets including equipment, inventory and accounts receivable. The value of real estate collateral is determined based on an appraisal by qualified licensed appraisers hired by the Company. The value of business equipment is based on an appraisal by qualified licensed appraisers hired by the Company if significant, or the equipment’s net book value on the business’ financial statements. Inventory and accounts receivable collateral are valued based on independent field examiner review or aging reports. Appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination or approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available for similar loans and collateral underlying such loans. Appraised values are reviewed by management using historical knowledge, market considerations, and knowledge of the client and client’s business.
Changes in level 3 fair value measurements
The table below presents a reconciliation of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022:
Obligations of
SBA
U.S. Government
Servicing
Interest Only
Entities and Agencies
Asset
Strip
Fair value, January 1, 2023
Total gains included in income
Settlements
Prepayments/paydowns
(225)
Transfers in and/or out of level 3
Fair value, March 31, 2023
Fair value, January 1, 2022
6,949
143
(220)
Fair value, March 31, 2022
6,729
159
27
There were no gains or losses included in earnings for securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the periods presented above. The only activity for these securities were prepayments. There were no purchases, sales, or transfers into and out of Level 3. The following table presents quantitative information about recurring Level 3 fair value measures at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
Valuation
Unobservable
General
Technique
Input
Range
March 31, 2023:
Recurring:
Discounted cash flows
Discount rate
3%-5%
SBA servicing asset and interest only strip
Prepayment speed
12.09%-17.36%
8.20%-15.97%
Nonrecurring:
Appraised value less estimated selling costs
Estimated selling costs
6%
December 31, 2022:
13.12%-17.60%
8.21%-19.30%
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 are as follows:
Carrying
Estimated Fair Value at March 31, 2023
Financial Assets:
Cash, due from banks, and federal funds sold
Investment securities
29,602
FHLB stock
N/A
2,924,232
61
13,581
SBA servicing assets
Interest only strips
Mortgage servicing assets
6,893
Financial Liabilities:
2,638,012
372,900
28
Estimated Fair Value at December 31, 2022
29,545
2,999,520
98
13,073
7,209
2,658,837
376,575
NOTE 11 – REGULATORY MATTERS
Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. Under the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks (“Basel III rules”), the Bank must hold a capital conservation buffer of 2.50% above the adequately capitalized risk-based capital ratios. The net unrealized gain or loss on available for sale securities, if any, is not included in computing regulatory capital. Management believes as of March 31, 2023 the Company and Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required. At March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution’s category.
29
The Company’s actual capital amounts (in thousands) and ratios are also presented in the following table:
To Be Well Capitalized
Minimum Capital Required -
Under Prompt Corrective
Actual
Basel III
Action Provisions:
Ratio
Amount ≥
Ratio ≥
As of March 31, 2023:
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Consolidated
349,829
17.51
209,801
10.5
Bank
349,124
17.47
209,796
199,806
10.0
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
330,643
16.55
169,839
8.5
329,938
16.51
169,835
159,844
8.0
Common Tier 1 (CET1)
139,867
7.0
139,864
129,874
6.5
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
9.72
136,114
4.0
9.70
136,109
170,136
5.0
As of December 31, 2022:
338,185
16.68
212,932
336,866
16.61
212,915
202,777
324,297
15.99
172,374
322,978
15.93
172,360
162,221
141,955
141,944
131,805
9.57
135,485
9.54
135,446
169,307
NOTE 12 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The Company adopted the MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. 2018 Stock Option Plan (the “Prior Option Plan”) effective as of April 18, 2018, and the Prior Option Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders on May 30, 2018. The Prior Option Plan provided for awards of stock options to officers, employees and directors of the Company. The Board of Directors of the Company determined that it was in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to amend and restate the Prior Option Plan to provide for the grant of additional types of awards. Acting pursuant to its authority under the Prior Option Plan, the Board of Directors approved and adopted the MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2018 Incentive Plan”), which constitutes the amended and restated version of the Prior Option Plan. The Board of Directors has reserved 2,400,000 shares of Company common stock for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2018 Incentive Plan, any or all of which may be granted as nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards and other stock-based awards. In the event all or a portion of a stock award is forfeited, cancelled, expires, or is terminated before becoming vested, paid, exercised, converted, or otherwise settled in full, any unissued or forfeited shares again become available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2018 Incentive Plan and do not count against the maximum number of reserved shares. In addition, shares of common stock deducted or withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations will be added back to the share reserve and will again be available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the plan. The 2018 Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (the “Committee”). The determination of award recipients under the 2018 Incentive Plan, and the terms of those awards, will be made by the Committee. At March 31, 2023, 240,000 stock options had been granted and 585,444 shares of restricted stock had been issued under the 2018 Incentive Plan.
30
Stock Options
A summary of stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2023 is presented below:
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Outstanding at January 1, 2023
240,000
12.70
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Outstanding at March 31, 2023
The Company recognized no compensation expense for stock options during the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022. As of both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, there was $0 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to options granted under the 2018 Incentive Plan. As of March 31, 2023, all of the cost related to the outstanding stock options had been recognized.
Restricted Stock Units
The Company has periodically issued restricted stock units to its directors, executive officers and certain employees under the 2018 Incentive Plan. Compensation expense for restricted stock is based upon the grant date fair value of the shares and is recognized over the vesting period of the units. Shares of restricted stock units issued to officers and employees vest in equal annual installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant date. Shares of restricted stock units issued to directors vest 25% on the grant date and 25% on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date.
A summary of restricted stock activity for the three months ended March 31, 2023 is presented below:
Weighted-
Average Grant-
Nonvested Shares
Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2023
177,399
17.95
Vested
Nonvested at March 31, 2023
During the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $298,000 and $194,000, respectively. As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, there was $2.0 million and $2.3 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested shares granted under the 2018 Incentive Plan. As of March 31, 2023, the cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
31
NOTE 13 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the periods indicated:
Basic earnings per share
Net Income
Weighted average common shares outstanding
25,144,683
Basic earnings per common share
Diluted earnings per share
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share
Add: Dilutive effects of restricted stock and options
261,172
253,799
Average shares and dilutive potential common shares
25,405,855
25,719,035
Diluted earnings per common share
There were no stock options or restricted stock excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share since they were antidilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.
32
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The purpose of this discussion and analysis is to focus on significant changes in the financial condition of MetroCity Bancshares, Inc. and our wholly owned subsidiary, Metro City Bank, from December 31, 2022 through March 31, 2023 and on our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2022 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and information presented elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, particularly the unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing in Item 1.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, future events and our financial performance. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “may,” “might,” “should,” “could,” “predict,” “potential,” “believe,” “expect,” “continue,” “will,” “anticipate,” “seek,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “strive,” “projection,” “goal,” “target,” “outlook,” “aim,” “would,” “annualized” and “outlook,” or the negative version of those words or other comparable words or phrases of a future or forward-looking nature. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, and are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by management, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and beyond our control. Accordingly, we caution you that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, assumptions, estimates and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the date made, actual results may prove to be materially different from the results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
A number of important factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these forward-looking statements, including those factors discussed elsewhere in this quarterly report and the following:
34
35
The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read together with the other cautionary statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Because of these risks and other uncertainties, our actual future results, performance or achievement, or industry results, may be materially different from the results indicated by the forward looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In addition, our past results of operations are not necessarily indicative of our future results. You should not rely on any forward looking statements, which represent our beliefs, assumptions and estimates only as of the dates on which they were made, as predictions of future events. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
CECL Adoption
On January 1, 2023, the Company adopted ASC Topic 326 which replaces the incurred loss approach for measuring credit losses with an expected loss model, referred to the current expected credit loss ("CECL") model. CECL applies to financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost and certain off-balance-sheet credit exposures, which include, but are not limited to, loans, leases, held-to-maturity securities, loan commitments and financial guarantees. The adoption of this guidance resulted in an increase of the allowance for credit losses of $5.1 million, the creation of an allowance for unfunded commitments of $239,000 and a reduction of retained earnings of $3.9 million, net of the increase in deferred tax assets of $1.4 million.
Going forward, the impact of utilizing the CECL approach to calculate the allowance for credit losses will be significantly influenced by the composition, characteristics and quality of our loan portfolio, as well as the prevailing economic conditions and forecasts utilized. Material changes to these and other relevant factors may result in greater volatility to the provision for credit losses, and therefore, greater volatility to our reported earnings. See Note 1 and Note 3 of our consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2023, included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, for additional information on the on the allowance for credit losses and the allowance for unfunded commitments.
36
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our accounting and reporting estimates conform with U.S. GAAP and general practices within the financial services industry. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. We consider accounting estimates that can (1) be replaced by other reasonable estimates and/or (2) changes to an estimate from period to period that have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations as well as (3) those estimates that require significant and complex assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain to be critical accounting estimates. We consider our critical accounting policies to include the allowance for credit losses, servicing assets, fair value of financial instruments and income taxes.
Critical accounting estimates include a high degree of uncertainty in the underlying assumptions. Management bases its estimates on historical experience, current information and other factors deemed relevant. The development, selection and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates are reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors. Actual results could differ from these estimates. For additional information regarding critical accounting policies, refer to “Part II - Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and Note 1 of our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2022 in the Company’s 2022 Form 10-K. Other than our methodology of estimating allowance for credit losses (mentioned below), there have been no significant changes in the Company’s application of critical accounting policies since December 31, 2022.
Reserve for Credit Losses
A consequence of lending activities is that we may incur credit losses. The amount of such losses will vary depending upon the risk characteristics of the loan lease portfolio as affected by economic conditions such as rising interest rates and the financial performance of borrowers.
The reserve for credit losses consists of the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) and the allowance for unfunded commitments. As a result of our January 1, 2023 adoption of ASU No. 2016-13, and its related amendments, our methodology for estimating the reserve for credit losses changed significantly from December 31, 2022. The standard replaced the “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” approach known as the Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”). The CECL approach requires an estimate of the credit losses expected over the life of an exposure (or pool of exposures). It removes the incurred loss approach’s threshold that delayed the recognition of a credit loss until it was “probable” a loss event was “incurred.”
The estimate of expected credit losses under the CECL approach is based on relevant information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amounts. Historical loss experience is generally the starting point for estimating expected credit losses. We then consider whether the historical loss experience should be adjusted for loan-specific risk characteristics or current conditions at the reporting date that did not exist over the period from which historical experience was used. Finally, we consider forecasts about future economic conditions that are reasonable and supportable. The allowance for unfunded commitments represents the expected credit losses on off-balance sheet commitments such as unfunded commitments to extend credit. This allowance is estimated by loan segment at each balance sheet date under the CECL model using the same methodologies as portfolio loans, taking into consideration the likelihood that funding will occur.
Management’s evaluation of the appropriateness of the reserve for credit losses is often the most critical of accounting estimates for a financial institution. Our determination of the amount of the reserve for credit losses is a critical accounting estimate as it requires significant reliance on the credit risk rating we assign to individual borrowers, the use of estimates and significant judgment as to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, reliance on historical loss rates on homogenous portfolios, consideration of our quantitative and qualitative evaluation of economic factors, and the reliance on our reasonable and supportable forecasts. The reserve for credit losses attributable to each portfolio segment also includes an amount for inherent risks not reflected in the historical analyses. Relevant factors include, but are not limited to, concentrations of credit risk (geographic, large borrower, and industry), local/regional economic trends and conditions,
37
changes in underwriting standards, changes in collateral values, experience and depth of lending staff, trends in delinquencies, and the volume and terms of loans.
Overview
MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in the Atlanta metropolitan area. We operate through our wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Metro City Bank, a Georgia state-chartered commercial bank that was founded in 2006. We currently operate 19 full-service branch locations in multi-ethnic communities in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, New York, New Jersey, Texas and Virginia. As of March 31, 2023, we had total assets of $3.42 billion, total loans of $3.01 billion, total deposits of $2.64 billion and total shareholders’ equity of $353.0 million.
We are a full-service commercial bank focused on delivering personalized service in an efficient and reliable manner to the small to medium-sized businesses and individuals in our markets, predominantly Asian-American communities in growing metropolitan markets in the Eastern U.S. and Texas. We offer a suite of loan and deposit products tailored to meet the needs of the businesses and individuals already established in our communities, as well as first generation immigrants who desire to establish and grow their own businesses, purchase a home, or educate their children in the United States. Through our diverse and experienced management team and talented employees, we are able to speak the language of our customers and provide them with services and products in a culturally competent manner.
38
Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth unaudited selected financial data for the most recent five quarters. This data should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in Item 1 and the information contained in this Item 2.
As of or for the Three Months Ended
September 30,
June 30,
Selected income statement data:
Interest income
43,945
38,297
33,025
Interest expense
14,995
8,509
2,805
28,950
29,788
30,220
(1,168)
(1,703)
Noninterest income
1,794
5,101
4,653
Noninterest expense
12,379
12,688
13,119
Income tax expense
9,383
7,011
5,654
10,180
16,893
16,100
Per share data:
Basic income per share
0.40
0.66
Diluted income per share
Dividends per share
0.18
0.15
Book value per share (at period end)
14.04
13.88
13.76
12.69
12.19
Shares of common stock outstanding
25,370,417
25,451,125
Weighted average diluted shares
25,560,138
25,702,023
25,729,156
Performance ratios:
Return on average assets
1.87
1.19
2.07
2.16
2.52
Return on average equity
18.09
11.57
20.56
20.65
26.94
Dividend payout ratio
28.98
37.55
22.75
23.85
19.76
Yield on total loans
5.85
5.50
5.11
4.95
5.00
Yield on average earning assets
5.77
5.43
4.94
4.65
4.34
Cost of average interest bearing liabilities
3.30
2.49
1.51
0.56
0.24
Cost of deposits
3.48
2.61
1.48
0.55
0.27
Net interest margin
3.58
3.84
4.26
4.16
Efficiency ratio(1)
33.11
40.26
36.37
37.62
31.79
Asset quality data (at period end):
Net charge-offs/(recoveries) to average loans held for investment
(0.00)
(0.01)
0.06
Nonperforming assets to gross loans and OREO
0.64
0.80
1.09
1.22
ACL to nonperforming loans
101.22
68.88
53.25
54.79
134.39
ACL to loans held for investment
0.45
0.50
0.60
Balance sheet and capital ratios:
Gross loans held for investment to deposits
114.27
114.94
116.21
115.86
105.72
Noninterest bearing deposits to deposits
21.83
22.95
23.43
25.87
25.84
Investment securities to assets
0.87
0.86
0.91
1.02
1.11
Common equity to assets
10.32
10.20
10.42
9.88
Leverage ratio
9.90
10.31
9.46
Common equity tier 1 ratio
16.18
16.70
17.24
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
Total risk-based capital ratio
16.94
17.60
18.22
Mortgage and SBA loan data:
Mortgage loans serviced for others
506,012
526,719
550,587
589,500
605,112
Mortgage loan production
43,335
88,045
255,662
326,973
162,933
Mortgage loan sales
37,928
56,987
SBA loans serviced for others
485,663
465,120
489,120
504,894
528,227
SBA loan production
15,352
42,419
22,193
21,407
50,689
SBA loan sales
36,458
8,588
22,898
39
Recent Industry Developments
During the first quarter of 2023, the banking industry experienced significant volatility with multiple high-profile bank failures and industry wide concerns related to liquidity, deposit outflows, uninsured deposit concentrations, unrealized securities losses and eroding consumer confidence in the banking system. Despite these negative industry developments, the Company’s liquidity position and balance sheet remains robust. The Company’s total deposits only decreased by 0.9% as compared to December 31, 2022, to $2.64 billion at March 31, 2023 as we experienced minimal deposit outflow in the first quarter. The Company’s uninsured deposits represented 31.9% of total deposits at March 31, 2023 compared to 32.5% of total deposits at December 31, 2022. The Company also took a number of preemptive actions, which included proactive outreach to clients and actions to maximize its funding sources in response to these recent developments. Furthermore, the Company’s capital remains strong with common equity Tier 1 and total capital ratios of 16.55% and 17.51%, respectively, as of March 31, 2023.
Results of Operations
We recorded net income of $15.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to $19.4 million for the same period in 2022, a decrease of $3.7 million, or 19.0%. Basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2023 was $0.63 and $0.62 compared to $0.76 for both the basic and diluted earnings per common share for the same period in 2022.
Interest Income
Interest income totaled $46.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2023, an increase of $14.0 million, or 43.9%, from the three months ended March 31, 2022, primarily due to an increase in average loan balances of $498.0 million coupled with an 85 basis points increase in the loan yield. The increase in average loans is due to an increase of $8.5 million in average construction and development loans, an increase of $123.0 million in average commercial real estate loans and an increase of $384.9 million in average residential mortgage loans, offset by a decrease of $18.3 million in commercial and industrial loans. As compared to the three months ended March 31, 2022, the yield on average interest-earning assets increased by 143 basis points to 5.77% from 4.34% with the yield on average loans increasing by 85 basis points and the yield on average total investments increasing by 405 basis points.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2023 increased $18.4 million, or 1,417.8%, to $19.7 million compared to interest expense of $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, primarily due to a 321 basis points increase in deposit costs and a 223 basis points increase in borrowing costs coupled with a $308.5 million increase in average interest-bearing deposit balances. The 321 basis points increase in deposit costs included a 375 basis point increase in the yield on average money market deposits and a 290 basis points increase in the yield on average time deposits. Average time deposits increased by $435.6 million while average money market deposits decreased by $106.8 million.
Average borrowings outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2023 decreased by $65.2 million with an increase in rate of 223 basis points compared to the three months ended March 31, 2022.
Net Interest Margin
The net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2023 decreased by 86 basis points to 3.30% from 4.16% for the three months ended March 31, 2022, primarily due to a 306 basis point increase in the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities of $2.43 billion, offset by a 143 basis point increase in the yield on average interest-earning assets of $3.23 billion. Average earning assets for the three months ended March 31, 2023 increased by $240.0 million from the same period in 2022, primarily due to a $498.0 million increase in average loans, offset by a $254.3 million decrease in average interest-earning cash accounts. Average interest-bearing liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2023 increased by $243.3 million from the same period in 2022, driven by an increase in average interest-bearing deposits of $308.5 million, offset by a decrease in average borrowings of $65.2 million.
40
Net interest margin and net interest income are influenced by internal and external factors. Internal factors include balance sheet changes on both volume and mix and pricing decisions, and external factors include changes in market interest rates, competition and the shape of the interest rate yield curve. The decline in our net interest margin is primarily the result of our increasing deposit costs.
Average Balances, Interest and Yields
The following tables present, for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, information about: (i) weighted average balances, the total dollar amount of interest income from interest-earning assets and the resultant average yields; (ii) average balances, the total dollar amount of interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities and the resultant average rates; (iii) net interest income; (iv) the interest rate spread; and (v) the net interest margin.
Interest and
Yield /
Fees
Rate
Earning Assets:
Federal funds sold and other investments(1)
145,354
1,805
5.04
399,642
365
0.37
32,952
178
2.19
36,842
129
1.42
Total investments
178,306
1,983
4.51
436,484
494
0.46
39,097
523
30,583
377
672,109
13,979
8.44
549,132
7,887
5.82
47,105
1,030
8.87
65,450
1,076
6.67
2,291,699
28,422
5.03
1,906,847
22,074
4.69
166
68.41
206
88.59
Gross loans(2)
3,050,176
2,552,218
Total earning assets
3,228,482
2,988,702
Noninterest-earning assets
175,110
142,042
3,403,592
3,130,744
Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW and savings deposits
166,962
648
1.57
187,259
0.16
Money market deposits
978,954
9,659
4.00
1,085,751
658
0.25
Time deposits
876,803
7,069
3.27
441,228
406
Total interest-bearing deposits
2,022,719
1,714,238
Borrowings
403,170
2.37
468,348
0.14
Total interest-bearing liabilities
2,425,889
2,182,586
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing deposits
578,978
588,343
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities
46,138
67,301
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
625,116
655,644
Shareholders' equity
352,587
292,514
Net interest spread
2.47
4.10
Rate/Volume Analysis
Increases and decreases in interest income and interest expense result from changes in average balances (volume) of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as changes in average interest rates. The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income during the period shown. Information is provided with respect to (i) effects on interest income attributable to changes in volume (change in volume multiplied by prior rate) and (ii) effects on interest income attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). Change applicable to both volumes and rate have been allocated to volume.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2023 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2022
Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in:
Volume
Yield/Rate
Total Change
Earning assets:
(47)
1,528
1,481
(138)
(185)
1,674
1,489
76
70
1,852
4,240
6,092
(359)
313
(46)
4,661
1,687
6,348
Consumer and Other
(17)
6,213
6,310
12,523
6,028
7,984
14,012
(13)
586
573
(116)
9,117
9,001
1,125
5,538
6,663
996
15,241
16,237
(305)
2,500
2,195
691
17,741
18,432
(9,757)
(4,420)
Provision for Credit Losses
The provision for credit losses reflects our internal calculation and judgment of the appropriate amount of the allowance for credit losses. The adoption of ASU No. 2016-13, “Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” or “CECL” has significantly changed the methodology of how we measure credit losses (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information). We maintain the allowance for credit losses at levels we believe are appropriate to cover our estimate of expected credit losses over the life of loans in the portfolio as of the end of the reporting period. The allowance for credit losses is determined through detailed quarterly analyses of our loan portfolio. The allowance for credit losses is based on our loss experience, changes in the economic environment, reasonable and supportable forecasts, as well as an ongoing assessment of credit quality and environmental factors not reflective in historical loss rates. Additional qualititavive factors that are considered in determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses are concentrations of credit risk (geographic, large borrower, and industry), local/regional economic trends and conditions, changes in underwriting standards, changes in collateral value, experience and depth of lending staff, trends in delinquencies, and the volume and terms of loans.
We recorded no provision for credit losses during the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to provision expense of $104,000 during the same period in 2022. Our ACL forecast outlook was relatively stable between the January 1, 2023 CECL implementation date and the period ended March 31, 2023. This resulted in only a slight increase in estimated reserves; however, the increase was offset by the decline in loan balances so no provision for credit losses was
42
needed. Our ACL as a percentage of gross loans for the periods ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 was 0.63% and 0.66%, respectively. Our ACL as a percentage of gross loans is relatively lower than our peers due to our high percentage of residential mortgage loans, which tend to have lower allowance for credit loss ratios compared to other commercial or consumer loans due to their low LTVs.
See the section captioned “Allowance for Credit Losses” elsewhere in this document for further analysis of our provision for credit losses.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2023 was $6.0 million, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 21.4%, compared to $7.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022. The following table sets forth the major components of our noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022:
$ Change
% Change
(32)
(6.7)
(1,285)
(59.5)
100.0
(197)
195.0
401
25.6
170
10.3
514
104.5
(1,640)
(21.4)
Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $32,000, or 6.7%, to $449,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to $481,000 for the same three months during 2022. This decrease was primarily attributable to lower analysis fees and overdraft fees.
Other service charges, commissions and fees decreased $1.3 million, or 59.5%, to $874,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to $2.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022. This decrease was mainly attributable to lower application, processing, underwriting and origination fees earned from our origination of residential mortgage loans as mortgage volume declined during the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to the same period in 2022. Mortgage loan originations totaled $43.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to $162.9 million during the same period in 2022.
Total gain on sale of loans was $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to $2.8 million for the same period of 2022, a decrease of $810,000, or 29.1%.
We recorded no gain on sale of residential mortgage loans during the three months ended March 31, 2023 as no residential mortgage loans were sold during the period. Gain on sale of residential mortgage loans totaled $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 as we sold $57.0 million in residential mortgage loans during the period with an average premium of 2.13%.
Gain on sale of SBA loans totaled $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to $1.6 million for the same period in 2022. We sold $36.5 million in SBA loans during the three months ended March 31, 2023 with average premiums of 6.80%. We sold $22.9 million in SBA loans during the three months ended March 31, 2022 with average premiums of 9.00%.
Mortgage loan servicing income, net of amortization, decreased by $197,000, or 195.0%, to an expense balance of $96,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to income of $101,000 for the same period of 2022. The changes in mortgage loan servicing income were primarily due to decreases in mortgage servicing fees and capitalized mortage servicing assets, offset by the decrease in mortgage servicing amortization. Included in mortgage loan servicing
43
income for the three months ended March 31, 2023 were $672,000 in mortgage servicing fees compared to $923,000 for the same period in 2022 and capitalized mortgage servicing assets of $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to $413,000 for the same period in 2022. These amounts were offset by mortgage loan servicing asset amortization of $768,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to $1.3 million during the same period in 2022. During the three months ended March 31, 2023, we did not record a fair value impairment on our mortgage servicing assets compared to a fair value impairment recovery of $75,000 recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2022. Our total residential mortgage loan servicing portfolio was $506.0 million at March 31, 2023 compared to $605.1 million at March 31, 2022.
SBA servicing income net increased by $170,000, or 10.3%, to $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022. Our total SBA loan servicing portfolio was $485.7 million as of March 31, 2023 compared to $528.2 million as of March 31, 2022. Our SBA servicing rights are carried at fair value and the inputs used to calculate fair value change from period to period. During the three months ended March 31, 2023 we recorded a $708,000 fair value increase to our SBA servicing rights compared to a $323,000 increase to our SBA servicing rights during the three months ended March 31, 2022.
Other noninterest income increased by $514,000, or 104.5%, to $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to $492,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2022. The increase was mainly due to a gain on sale of foreclosed real estate of $547,000 recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to a loss on sale of $15,000 recorded during the same period in 2022. The largest component of other noninterest income is the income on bank owned life insurance which totaled $435,000 and $404,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2023 was $10.7 million compared to $12.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, a decrease of $1.5 million, or 12.3%. The following table sets forth the major components of our noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022:
(Dollars in thousands )
Noninterest Expense:
(730)
(10.3)
(1.1)
(2)
(0.7)
(4)
(2.7)
(751)
(21.9)
(1,500)
(12.3)
Salaries and employee benefits expense for the three months ended March 31, 2023 was $6.4 million compared to $7.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, a decrease of $730,000, or 10.3%. This decrease was partially attributable to lower commissions paid to our loan officers as loan volume declined during the three months ended March 31, 2023.
Occupancy and equipment expense for the three months ended March 31, 2023 was $1.2 million compared to $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, a slight decrease of $13,000, or 1.1%. This decrease was partially due to lower depreciation expense.
Data processing expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2023 remained relatively flat compared to the same period in 2022.
Advertising expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2023 remained relatively flat compared to the same period in 2022.
Other expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2023 were $2.7 million compared to $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, a decrease of $751,000, or 21.9%. This decrease was primarily due to lower FDIC deposit insurance premiums and security expense, as well as fair value gains on our equity securities, partially offset by higher other real estate owned expenses. Included in other expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 were directors’ fees of approximately $137,000 and $139,000, respectively.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022 was $5.8 million and $6.6 million, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rates were 27.1% and 25.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”) was signed into law, creating a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax on profits of corporations based on average annual adjusted financial statement income effective for tax years beginning January 1, 2023. We do not anticipate a material impact on our financial position or results of operations from the IRA.
Financial Condition
Total assets decreased $8.2 million, or 0.2%, to $3.42 billion at March 31, 2023 as compared to $3.43 billion at December 31, 2022. The decrease in total assets was primarily attributable to decreases in loans of $43.7 million, federal funds sold of $20.6 million, interest rate derivatives of $4.8 million and foreclosed real estate of $3.6 million, as well as an increase in the allowance for credit losses of $5.1 million, partially offset by increases in cash and due from banks of $65.2 million and other assests of $2.7 million.
Gross loans decreased $44.0 million, or 1.4%, to $3.02 billion as of March 31, 2023 as compared to $3.07 billion as of December 31, 2022. Our loan decline during the three months ended March 31, 2023 was comprised of an increase of $1.4 million, or 3.0%, in construction and development loans, a decrease of $17.3 million, or 2.6%, in commercial real estate loans, a decrease of $7.0 million, or 13.1%, in commercial and industrial loans, a decrease of $21.0 million, or 0.9%, in residential real estate loans and a decrease of $166,000, or 76.9%, in consumer and other loans. There were no loans classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2023 or December 31, 2022.
The following table presents the ending balance of each major category in our loan portfolio held for investment at the dates indicated.
% of Total
1.6
21.2
21.4
1.5
1.7
75.7
75.3
Gross loans
Less unearned income
Total loans held for investment
SBA Loan Servicing
As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we serviced $485.7 million and $465.1 million, respectively, in SBA loans for others. We carried a servicing asset of $7.8 million and $7.1 million at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. See Note 4 of our consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2023, included elsewhere in this
Form 10-Q, for additional information on the activity for SBA loan servicing rights for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.
Residential Mortgage Loan Servicing
As of March 31, 2023, we serviced $506.0 million in residential mortgage loans for others compared to $526.7 million as of December 31, 2022. We carried a servicing asset, net of amortization, of $3.2 million and $4.0 million at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. Amortization relating to the mortgage loan servicing asset was $768,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2023 compared to $1.3 million for the same period in 2022. During the three months ended March 31, 2023, we did not record a fair value impairment on our mortgage servicing asset compared to a $75,000 fair value impairment recovery recorded for the same period in 2022. See Note 5 of our consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2023, included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, for additional information on the activity for mortgage loans servicing rights for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.
Asset Quality
Nonperforming Loans
Asset quality remained relatively strong during the first quarter of 2023 as our nonperforming loans to total loans remained low at 0.62% as of March 31, 2023. Nonperforming loans were $18.7 million at March 31, 2023 compared to $20.2 million at December 31, 2022. The decrease from December 31, 2022 to March 31, 2023 was attributable to a $1.0 million decrease in nonaccrual loans, a $180,000 decrease in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing, and a $265,000 decrease in accruing restructured loans. We did not recognize any interest income on nonaccrual loans during the three months ended March 31, 2023 or the year ended December 31, 2022.
The following table sets forth the allocation of our nonperforming assets among our different asset categories as of the dates indicated. Nonperforming loans include nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest, and accruing restructured loans. Nonaccrual loans at March 31, 2023 comprised of $1.6 million of commercial real estate loans, $218,000 in commercial and industrial loans and $7.3 million in residential real estate loans. Nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2022 comprised of $4.9 million in commercial real estate loans, $136,000 in commercial and industrial loans, and $5.0 million in residential real estate loans.
Nonaccrual loans
Past due loans 90 days or more and still accruing
Accruing restructured loans
9,654
9,919
Total nonperforming loans
18,718
20,164
Foreclosed real estate
Total nonperforming assets
19,484
24,492
Nonperforming loans to gross loans
Nonperforming assets to total assets
0.57
0.71
Allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans
The allowance for credit losses was $19.0 million at March 31, 2023 compared to $13.9 million at December 31, 2022, an increase of $5.1 million or 36.4%. The increase was entirely due to the CECL adoption during the first quarter of 2023. The CECL approach requires an estimate of the credit losses expected over the life of an exposure (or pool of exposures). It removes the incurred loss approach’s threshold that delayed the recognition of a credit loss until it was probable a loss event was incurred.
We maintain a reserve for credit losses that consist of two components, the allowance for credit losses and the allowance for unfunded commitments, The allowance for credit losses provides for the risk of credit losses expected in our loan portfolio and is based on loss estimates derived from a comprehensive quarterly evaluation. The evaluation
46
reflects analyses of individual borrowers for impairment coupled with analysis of historical loss experience in various loan pools that have been grouped based on similar risk characteristics, supplemented as necessary by credit judgment that considers observable trends, conditions, reasonable and supportable forecasts, and other relevant environmental and economic factors. The level of the allowance for credit losses is adjusted by recording an expense or credit through the provision for credit losses. The level of the allowance for unfunded commitments is adjusted by recording an expense or credit in other noninterest expense. The allwance for unfunded commitments was created upon adoption of CECL on January 1, 2023 and had a balance of $239,000 as of March 31, 2023.
The following table provides an analysis of the allowance for credit losses, provision for credit losses and net charge-offs for the periods presented below:
Balance, beginning of period
CECL adoption (Day 1) impact
Charge-offs:
390
Total charge-offs
Recoveries:
Total recoveries
Net (recoveries)/charge-offs
382
Balance, end of period
Total loans at end of period
2,518,351
Average loans(1)
2,533,254
Net charge-offs to average loans
0.00
Allowance for credit losses to total loans
Management believes the allowance for credit losses is adequate to provide for losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of March 31, 2023.
Total deposits decreased $22.7 million, or 0.9%, to $2.64 billion at March 31, 2023 compared to $2.67 billion at December 31, 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a $82.5 million decrease in money market accounts, a $34.7 million decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits and a $3.1 million decrease in savings accounts, offset by a $93.2 million increase
in time deposits and a $4.4 million increase interest-bearing demand deposits. The decrease in money market accounts was partially due to the decrease of $64.8 million in brokered money market balances during the three months ended March 31, 2023. As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, 21.8% and 22.9% of total deposits, respectively, were comprised of noninterest-bearing demand accounts and 78.2% and 77.1%, respectively, of interest-bearing deposit accounts.
We had $461.6 million of brokered deposits, or 17.5% of total deposits, at March 31, 2023 compared to $523.7 million, or 19.6% of total deposits, at December 31, 2022. We use brokered deposits, subject to certain limitations and requirements, as a source of funding to support our asset growth and augment the deposits generated from our branch network, which are our principal source of funding. Our level of brokered deposits varies from time to time depending on competitive interest rate conditions and other factors and tends to increase as a percentage of total deposits when the brokered deposits are less costly than issuing internet certificates of deposit or borrowing from the Federal Home Loan Bank.
Uninsured deposits were 31.9% of total deposits at March 31, 2023, compared to 32.5% and 27.4% at December 31, 2022 and March 31, 2022, respectively. As of March 31, 2023, we had $1.13 billion of available borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Bank ($657.0 million), Federal Reserve Discount Window ($429.0 million) and various other financial institutions (fed fund lines totaling $47.5 million).
The following table summarizes our average deposit balances and weighted average rates for the three months ended March 31, 2023 and 2022.
Average Rate
Noninterest-bearing demand
Interest-bearing demand deposits
149,266
1.74
155,418
Savings and money market deposits
557,508
3.21
705,643
0.31
Brokered money market deposits
439,142
4.85
411,949
2,601,697
2.71
2,302,581
0.20
Borrowed Funds
Other than deposits, we also utilized FHLB advances as a supplementary funding source to finance our operations. The advances from the FHLB are collateralized by residential real estate loans. At March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we had available borrowing capacity from the FHLB of $657.0 million and $633.6 billion, respectively. At March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we had $375.0 million of outstanding advances from the FHLB.
In addition to our advances with the FHLB, we maintain federal funds agreements with our correspondent banks. Our available borrowings under these agreements were $47.5 million at March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. We did not have any advances outstanding under these agreements as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Liquidity refers to the measure of our ability to meet the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers, while at the same time meeting our operating, capital and strategic cash flow needs, all at a reasonable cost. We continuously monitor our liquidity position to ensure that assets and liabilities are managed in a manner that will meet all short-term and long-term cash requirements. We manage our liquidity position to meet the daily cash flow needs of customers, while
maintaining an appropriate balance between assets and liabilities to meet the return on investment objectives of our shareholders.
Our liquidity position is supported by management of liquid assets and access to alternative sources of funds. Our liquid assets include cash, interest-bearing deposits in correspondent banks, federal funds sold, and fair value of unpledged investment securities. Other available sources of liquidity include wholesale deposits, and additional borrowings from correspondent banks, FHLB advances, and the Federal Reserve discount window.
Our short-term and long-term liquidity requirements are primarily met through cash flow from operations, redeployment of prepaying and maturing balances in our loan and investment portfolios, and increases in customer deposits. Other alternative sources of funds will supplement these primary sources to the extent necessary to meet additional liquidity requirements on either a short-term or long-term basis.
As part of our liquidity management strategy, we open federal funds lines with our correspondent banks. As of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we had $47.5 million of unsecured federal funds lines with no amounts advanced. In addition, the Company had Federal Reserve Discount Window funds available of approximately $429.0 million at March 31, 2023. The FRB discount window line is collateralized by a pool of construction and development, commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans with carrying balances totaling $539.1 million as of March 31, 2023, as well as all of the Company’s municipal and mortgage backed securities. There were no outstanding borrowings on this line as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.
At both March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we had $375.0 million of outstanding advances from the FHLB. Based on the values of loans pledged as collateral, we had $657.0 million and $633.6 million of additional borrowing availability with the FHLB as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022, respectively. We also maintain relationships in the capital markets with brokers to issue certificates of deposit and money market accounts.
Capital Requirements
The Company and the Bank are required under federal law to maintain certain minimum capital levels based on ratios of capital to total assets and capital to risk-weighted assets. The required capital ratios are minimums, and the federal banking agencies may determine that a banking organization, based on its size, complexity or risk profile, must maintain a higher level of capital in order to operate in a safe and sound manner. Risks such as concentration of credit risks and the risk arising from non-traditional activities, as well as the institution’s exposure to a decline in the economic value of its capital due to changes in interest rates, and an institution’s ability to manage those risks are important factors that are to be taken into account by the federal banking agencies in assessing an institution’s overall capital adequacy.
The table below summarizes the capital requirements applicable to the Company and the Bank in order to be considered “well-capitalized” from a regulatory perspective, as well as the Company’s and the Bank’s capital ratios as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. The Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements and was considered to be “well-capitalized” as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, the FDIC categorized the Bank as well-capitalized under the prompt corrective action framework. There have been no conditions or events since December 31, 2022 that management believes would change this classification. While the Company believes that it has sufficient capital to withstand an extended economic recession, its reported and regulatory capital ratios could be adversely impacted in future periods.
49
Regulatory
Capital Ratio
Requirements
Minimum
including
Requirement
fully phased-
for "Well
in Capital
Capitalized"
Conservation
Depository
Buffer
Institution
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
10.50
10.00
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
8.50
8.00
CETI capital (to risk-weighted assets)
7.00
6.50
Tier 1 capital (to average assets)
Dividends
On April 19, 2023, the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.18 per share, payable on May 12, 2023, to common shareholders of record as of May 3, 2023. Any future determination to pay dividends to holders of our common stock will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, banking regulations, contractual restrictions and any other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in our consolidated balance sheet. The contractual or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement we have in particular classes of financial instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if we deem collateral is necessary upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. They are intended to be disbursed, subject to certain condition, upon request of the borrower.
See Note 9 of our consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2023, included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, for more information regarding our off-balance sheet arrangements as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss due to changes in market values of assets and liabilities. We incur market risk in the normal course of business through exposures to market interest rates, equity prices, and credit spreads. We have identified interest rate risk as our primary source of market risk.
Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and value arising from changes in market interest rates. Interest rate risk arises from timing differences in the repricings and maturities of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (repricing risk), changes in the expected maturities of assets and liabilities arising from embedded options, such as borrowers’ ability to prepay home mortgage loans at any time and depositors’ ability to redeem certificates of deposit before maturity (option risk), changes in the shape of the yield curve where interest rates increase or decrease in a nonparallel fashion (yield curve risk), and changes in spread relationships between different yield curves, such as U.S. Treasuries and LIBOR (basis risk).
Our board of directors establishes broad policy limits with respect to interest rate risk. As part of this policy, the asset liability committee, or ALCO, establishes specific operating guidelines within the parameters of the board of directors’ policies. In general, the ALCO focuses on ensuring a stable and steadily increasing flow of net interest income through managing the size and mix of the balance sheet. The management of interest rate risk is an active process which encompasses monitoring loan and deposit flows complemented by investment and funding activities. Effective management of interest rate risk begins with understanding the dynamic characteristics of assets and liabilities and determining the appropriate interest rate risk posture given business forecasts, management objectives, market expectations, and policy constraints.
An asset sensitive position refers to a balance sheet position in which an increase in short-term interest rates is expected to generate higher net interest income, as rates earned on our interest-earning assets would reprice upward more quickly than rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities, thus expanding our net interest margin. Conversely, a liability sensitive position refers to a balance sheet position in which an increase in short-term interest rates is expected to generate lower net interest income, as rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities would reprice upward more quickly than rates earned on our interest-earning assets, thus compressing our net interest margin.
Interest rate risk measurement is calculated and reported to the ALCO at least quarterly. The information reported includes period-end results and identifies any policy limits exceeded, along with an assessment of the policy limit breach and the action plan and timeline for resolution, mitigation, or assumption of the risk.
Evaluation of Interest Rate Risk
We use income simulations, an analysis of core funding utilization, and economic value of equity (EVE) simulations as our primary tools in measuring and managing interest rate risk. These tools are utilized to quantify the potential earnings impact of changing interest rates over a two year simulation horizon (income simulations) as well as identify expected earnings trends given longer term rate cycles (long term simulations, core funding utilizations, and EVE simulation). A standard gap report and funding matrix will also be utilized to provide supporting detailed information on the expected timing of cashflow and repricing opportunities.
There are an infinite number of potential interest rate scenarios, each of which can be accompanied by differing economic/political/regulatory climates; can generate multiple differing behavior patterns by markets, borrowers, depositors, etc.; and can last for varying degrees of time. Therefore, by definition, interest rate risk sensitivity cannot be predicted with certainty. Accordingly, the Bank’s interest rate risk measurement philosophy focuses on maintaining an appropriate balance between theoretical and practical scenarios; especially given the primary objective of the Bank’s overall asset/liability management process is to facilitate meaningful strategy development and implementation.
Therefore, we model a set of interest rate scenarios capturing the financial effects of a range of plausible rate scenarios, the collective impact of which will enable the Bank to clearly understand the nature and extent of its sensitivity to interest rate changes. Doing so necessitates an assessment of rate changes over varying time horizons and of varying/sufficient degrees such that the impact of embedded options within the balance sheet are sufficiently examined.
We use a net interest income simulation model to measure and evaluate potential changes in our net interest income. We run three standard and plausible comparing current or flat rates with a +/- 200 basis point ramp in rates over 12 months. These rate scenarios are considered appropriate as they are neither too modest (e.g. +/- 100 basis points) or too extreme (e.g. +/- 400 basis points) given the economic and rate cycles which have unfolded in the last 25 years. This analysis also provides the foundation for historical tracking of interest rate risk. The impact of interest rate derivatives, such as interest rate swaps and caps, is included in the model.
Potential changes to our net interest income in hypothetical rising and declining rate scenarios calculated as of March 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 are presented in the following table:
Net Interest Income Sensitivity
12 Month Projection
24 Month Projection
(Ramp in basis points)
+200
-100
0.10
1.20
22.70
12.60
(1.60)
2.50
21.60
12.90
We also model the impact of rate changes on our Economic Value of Equity, or EVE. We base the modeling of EVE based on interest rate shocks as shocks are considered more appropriate for EVE, which accelerates future interest rate risk into current capital via a present value calculation of all future cashflows from the bank’s existing inventory of assets and liabilities. Our simulation model incorporates interest rate shocks of +/- 100, 200, and 300 basis points. The results of the model are presented in the table below:
Economic Value of Equity Sensitivity
(Shock in basis points)
+300
+100
(20.70)
(14.00)
(7.00)
8.30
(17.80)
(11.90)
(5.90)
6.90
Our simulation model incorporates various assumptions, which we believe are reasonable but which may have a significant impact on results such as: (i) the timing of changes in interest rates; (ii) shifts or rotations in the yield curve; (iii) re-pricing characteristics for market-rate-sensitive instruments; (iv) varying loan prepayment speeds for different interest rate scenarios; and (v) the overall growth and mix of assets and liabilities. Because of limitations inherent in any approach used to measure interest rate risk, simulation results are not intended as a forecast of the actual effect of a change in market interest rates on our results but rather as a means to better plan and execute appropriate asset-liability management strategies and manage our interest rate risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2023. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2023.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended March 31, 2023, there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 of the Exchange Act that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company is continually monitoring and assessing changes in processes and activities to determine any potential impact on the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are a party to various legal proceedings such as claims and lawsuits arising in the course of our normal business activities. Although the ultimate outcome of all claims and lawsuits outstanding as of March 31, 2023 cannot be ascertained at this time, it is the opinion of management that these matters, when resolved, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in “Part I – Item 1A – Risk Factors” of the Company’s 2022 Form 10-K, which could materially affect its business, financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or future results. Please be aware that these risks may change over time and other risks may prove to be important in the future. New risks may emerge at any time, and we cannot predict such risks or estimate the extent to which they may affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, or the trading price of our securities.
Other than the risk factor set forth below related to the recent negative developments in the banking industry, there are no material changes during the period covered by this Report to the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s 2022 Form 10-K.
Recent negative developments in the banking industry could adversely affect our current and projected business operations and our financial condition and results of operations.
The recent bank failures and related negative media attention have generated significant market trading volatility among publicly traded bank holding companies and, in particular, regional banks like the Company. These developments have negatively impacted customer confidence in regional banks, which could prompt customers to maintain their deposits with larger financial institutions. Further, competition for deposits has increased in recent periods, and the cost of funding has similarly increased, putting pressure on our net interest margin. If we were required to sell a portion of our securities portfolio to address liquidity needs, we may incur losses, including as a result of the negative impact of rising interest rates on the value of our securities portfolio, which could negatively affect our earnings and our capital. If we were required to raise additional capital in the current environment, any such capital raise may be on unfavorable terms, thereby negatively impacting book value and profitability. While we have taken actions to improve our funding, there is no guarantee that such actions will be successful or sufficient in the event of sudden liquidity needs.
We also anticipate increased regulatory scrutiny – in the course of routine examinations and otherwise – and new regulations directed towards banks of similar size to the Bank, designed to address the recent negative developments in the banking industry, all of which may increase the Company’s costs of doing business and reduce its profitability. Among other things, there may be an increased focus by both regulators and investors on deposit composition, the level of uninsured deposits, losses embedded in the held-to-maturity portion of our securities portfolio, contingent liquidity, CRE composition and concentration, capital position and our general oversight and internal control structures regarding the foregoing. As primarily a commercial bank, the Bank has an elevated degree of uninsured deposits compared to larger national banks or smaller community banks with a stronger focus on retail deposits, and also maintains a robust CRE portfolio. As a result, the Bank could face increased scrutiny or be viewed as higher risk by regulators and the investor community.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table summarizes the repurchases of our common shares for the three months ended March 31, 2023.
Total Number of
Shares Repurchased
Maximum Number of
as Part of Publicly
Shares That May Yet Be
Average Price Paid
Announced
Purchased Under
Per Share
Plans or Programs
the Plans or Programs
January 1, 2023 to January 31, 2023
26,034
21.17
266,533
February 1, 2023 to February 28, 2023
March 1, 2023 to March 31, 2023
19.89
On May 5, 2022, the Company announced that the Board of Directors of the Company approved the adoption of a share repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to 689,191 shares of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock. The share repurchase program began on May 6, 2022 and ended on January 9, 2023. The repurchases were made in compliance with all Securities and Exchange Commission rules, including Rule 10b-18, and other legal requirements and were made in part under Rule 10b5-1 plans, which permits stock repurchases when the Company might otherwise be precluded from doing so. Repurchases were made from time-to-time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions depending on market and/or other conditions.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No.
Description of Exhibit
3.1
Restated Articles of Incorporation of MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed September 4, 2019 (File No. 333-233625)
3.2
Amended and Restated Bylaws of MetroCity Bankshares, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed September 4, 2019 (File No. 333-233625)
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page has been formatted in Inline XBRL and contained within the Inline XBRL Instance Document in Exhibit 101
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 8, 2023
By:
/s/ Nack Y. Paek
Nack Y. Paek
Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Lucas Stewart
Lucas Stewart
Chief Financial Officer