McGrath RentCorp - 10-Q quarterly report FY

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended June 30, 2004

Commission file number 0-13292

McGRATH RENTCORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)

5700 Las Positas Road, Livermore, CA 94551-7800

(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number: (925) 606-9200

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined under Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

At August 5, 2004 12,169,524 shares of Registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MCGRATH RENTCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1

MCGRATH RENTCORP

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2

MCGRATH RENTCORP

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

MCGRATH RENTCORP

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2004

NOTE 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The consolidated financial information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 have not been audited, but in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals, consolidation and eliminating entries) necessary for the fair presentation of the consolidated results of operations, financial position, and cash flows of McGrath RentCorp (the “Company”) have been made. The consolidated results of the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 should not be considered as necessarily indicative of the consolidated results for the entire year. It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s latest Form 10-K.

NOTE 2. ACQUISITION

In May 2004, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement to purchase substantially all of the assets of Technology Rentals & Services (“TRS”), a division of CIT Group Inc. (“CIT”) in order to facilitate the growth of the electronics business. Based in Dallas, Texas, TRS is similar to the Company’s existing electronics business, RenTelco, and is one of the leading providers of general purpose and communications test equipment for rent or sale in North America. The transaction was completed on June 2, 2004 for cash consideration of approximately $120.6 million, including expenses of $1.0 million, subject to final adjustments by the Company to the seller’s preliminary accounting report.

The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Under the purchase method of accounting, the total purchase price is allocated to TRS’ net tangible assets based upon their fair value as of the date of the transaction. Based upon the preliminary allocation of the purchase price and management’s estimate of fair value based upon the preliminary independent valuation, the purchase price allocation, which is subject to change based on the Company’s final adustments, is as follows:

An independent valuation of the purchased assets was performed to assist in determining the fair value of each identifiable tangible and intangible asset and in allocating the purchase price among the acquired assets and assumed liabilities. Standard valuation procedures and techniques were utilized in determining the fair values. The results of the valuation indicated that the value of intangible assets was de minimus.

Since June 2, 2004, TRS’ results are included in the consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004. The Company financed the acquisition from a revolving line of credit facility with its banks and $60 million in fixed-rate senior notes. At June 30, 2004, $2.2 million is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities related to the purchase price. Going forward, the electronics division will operate under the name TRS-RenTelco.

Supplemental pro forma information reflecting the acquisition of TRS as if it occurred on January 1, 2003 has not been provided due to the fact that the historical data necessary to compile such pro forma information was impracticable to obtain.

4

NOTE 3. FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSACTIONS

In conjunction with the TRS acquisition, the Company formed a Canadian subsidiary, TRS-RenTelco Inc., a British Columbia Corporation. The functional currency of the Company’s Canadian subsidiary is the U.S. dollar. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are reported in results of operations in the period in which they occur. Currently, the Company does not employ a foreign currency hedge program utilizing foreign currency exchange contracts as the foreign currency transactions, and risks to date have not been significant.

NOTE 4. STOCK OPTIONS

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation plans in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” under which compensation cost is recorded as the difference between the fair value and the exercise price at the date of grant, and is recorded on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the underlying options. The Company has adopted the disclosure only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. No compensation expense has been recognized in the accompanying financial statements as the option terms are fixed and the exercise price equals the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant for all options granted by the Company.

Had compensation cost for the stock-based compensation plans been determined based upon the fair value at grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, net income would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

NOTE 5. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed as net income divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed as net income divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding of common stock and common stock equivalents for the period, including the dilutive effects of stock options and other potentially dilutive securities. Common stock equivalents result from dilutive stock options computed using the treasury stock method and the average share price for the reported period. The number of dilutive options outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were 712,458 and 600,153, respectively. As of June 30, 2004, stock options to purchase 22,500 shares of the Company’s common stock were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the exercise price exceeded the average market price for the quarter and the effect would have been anti-dilutive.

NOTE 6. NOTES PAYABLE

Repayment of Senior Notes

On April 15, 2004, the Company opted to prepay the remaining $16.0 million of its 6.44% senior notes (“Notes”) along with accrued interest of $258,000 and a prepayment fee of $561,000. The total payment of $16.8 million was advanced under the Company’s revolving line of credit at its then current floating interest rate of 2.3%. Subsequent to the repayment of these Notes, the Company had $46.2 million drawn on its unsecured lines of credit, which permit the Company to borrow up to $125.0 million.

5

Revolving Lines of Credit

In May 2004, the Company renewed and extended its unsecured line of credit agreement (the “Agreement”) through June 30, 2007 that permits it to borrow up to $130.0 million. The Agreement requires the Company to pay interest at prime or, at the Company’s election, at other rate options available under the Agreement. In addition, the Company pays a commitment fee on the daily average unused portion of the available line. Among other restrictions, the Agreement requires the Company to (1) maintain a minimum net worth of $127.5 million plus 50% of all net income generated subsequent to December 31, 2003 plus 90% of the gross proceeds of any new stock issuance proceeds (restricted equity at June 30, 2004 was $133.4 million), (2) not to exceed certain funded debt to EBITDA (income from operations plus depreciation and amortization plus TRS pro-forma EBITDA as defined in the Agreement) ratios during specified periods of the Agreement and (3) not to exceed certain rolling fixed charge coverage ratios during specified periods of the Agreement. In addition to the $130.0 million unsecured line of credit, the Company renewed and extended its $5.0 million revolving line of credit (at prime rate) related to its cash management services through June 30, 2007. At June 30, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all covenants related to the Agreement and has the capacity to borrow up to an additional $26.5 million under the existing bank lines of credit.

Private Placement

On June 2, 2004, the Company completed a private placement of $60.0 million of 5.08% senior notes due in 2011. Interest on these notes is due semi-annually in arrears and the principal is due in five equal installments commencing on June 2, 2007. Among other restrictions, the Note Agreement, under which the senior notes were sold, requires the Company to maintain a minimum tangible net worth, funded debt to EBITDA ratios and rolling fixed charge ratios similar to the $130.0 million unsecured line of credit agreement described above. As of June 30, 2004, the Company was in default of the Note Agreement resulting from the failure of the Company to deliver a supplemental legal opinion to the 5.08% senior note holders within the time specified by the Note Agreement. Subsequent to June 30, 2004, the Company cured the default by delivering the required legal opinion, and no event of default now exists under the Note Agreement.

NOTE 7. RESTRUCTURING

In the second quarter of 2004, the Company implemented a restructuring plan to consolidate operations of the Company’s existing electronics business into the acquired TRS facility located in Dallas, Texas. The primary goal was to reduce operating expenses to more appropriately align them with sustainable revenue levels. These actions affected 22 employees for which the Company incurred one-time costs related to employee severance payments, related benefit and outplacement expenses in the amount of $0.9 million. This balance remains as of June 30, 2004 with all obligations expected to be paid by June 2005.

6

NOTE 8. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Revenues related to operations in the United States and other countries, based on shipment destination, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 are as follows:

Long-lived assets, which include rental equipment and property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, as of June 30, 2004 are as follows:

Comparative 2003 revenues and long-lived assets by country are not presented above, as the amounts in other countries were not material.

7

NOTE 9. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company defines its business segments based on the nature of operations for the purpose of reporting under SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”. The Company’s three reportable segments are Mobile Modular Management Corporation (Modulars), TRS-RenTelco (Electronics), formerly RenTelco, and Enviroplex. The operations and accounting policies of these three segments are described in Notes 1 and 2 of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s latest Form 10-K. As a separate corporate entity, Enviroplex revenues and expenses are separately maintained from Modulars and Electronics. Excluding interest expense, allocations of revenues and expenses not directly associated with Modulars or Electronics are generally allocated to these segments based on their pro-rata share of direct revenues. Interest expense is allocated between Modulars and Electronics based on their pro-rata share of average rental equipment, accounts receivable, deferred income and customer security deposits. The Company does not report total assets by business segment. Summarized financial information for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 for the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following table:

8

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISOF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements, which constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical facts included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q regarding the Company’s business strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues or losses, projected costs, prospects, plans, objectives, the Company’s ability to sell rental equipment in excess of required levels, and the sufficiency of the Company’s working capital expenditures through 2004 are forward-looking statements. These statements appear in a number of places and can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes”, “expects”, “may”, “estimates”, “will”, “should”, “plans” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Readers should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Actual results may vary materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. These factors include: the effectiveness of management’s strategies and decisions; general economic and business conditions; new or modified statutory or regulatory requirements relating to the Company’s modular operations; changing prices and market conditions; impairment charges on the Company’s rental equipment; and fluctuations in the Company’s rentals and sales of modular or electronics equipment. This report identifies other factors that could cause such differences. No assurance can be given that these are all of the factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from the forward-looking statements.

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003

On June 2, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of substantially all the assets of TRS, a division of CIT Group Inc., for approximately $120.6 million, including expenses of $1.0 million, subject to final adjustments by the Company to the seller’s preliminary accounting report. TRS, based in Dallas, Texas, is similar to the Company’s existing electronics business, RenTelco, and is one of the leading providers of general purpose and communications test equipment for rent or sale in North America. Since June 2, 2004, TRS’s results are included in the consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004. Going forward, the electronics business will operate under the name TRS-RenTelco.

The Company is comprised of three business segments: “Mobile Modular Management Corporation” (“MMMC”), its modular building rental division, “TRS-RenTelco,” its electronic test equipment rental division, and “Enviroplex,” its majority-owned subsidiary classroom manufacturing business. Although the Company’s primary emphasis is on equipment rentals, sales of equipment occur in the normal course of business. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, MMMC, TRS-RenTelco and Enviroplex contributed 89%, 12% and (1%) of the Company’s pre-tax income, respectively.

The Company’s rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $7.3 million (40%) and $8.9 million (24%), respectively, from the comparative periods in 2003.

9

Depreciation of rental equipment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $2.8 million (88%) and $2.9 million (46%) from the comparative periods in 2003 primarily due to the depreciation related to the acquired TRS rental assets. For MMMC, for the six months ended June 30, 2004, depreciation expense as a percentage of rental revenues increased slightly to 12% from 11% in the prior year’s comparable period. For TRS-RenTelco, for the six months ended June 30, 2004, depreciation expense as a percentage of rental revenues decreased to 44% from 47% in the prior year’s comparable period due to higher rental revenues from improved rental rates and utilization of equipment.

Other direct costs of rental operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $0.3 million (6%) and $0.5 million (6%) over last year’s comparable periods primarily due to the higher expenses associated with the combined TRS-RenTelco electronics business. For the six-month period, consolidated gross margin percentage on rents improved from 57.8% in 2003, to 58.6% in 2004 as a result of rental revenues increasing at a 2% higher rate than the related costs, which is primarily depreciation.

Rental related services revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $2.2 million (59%) and $3.2 million (44%) from the comparative periods in 2003. These revenues are primarily associated with modulars and consist of services negotiated as an integral part of the lease, which are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. For the six-month period, the revenue increase resulted from the change in mix of leases within their original term and additional services performed during the lease. Gross margin percentage on these services for the six months ended June 30 increased from 39.3% in 2003 to 39.6% in 2004.

Sales revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased $0.3 million (3%) and $0.5 million (3%) from the comparable periods in 2003 as a result of lower sales volumes by Enviroplex, offset for the most part by higher sales volume at TRS-RenTelco and MMMC. Sales continue to occur routinely as a normal part of the Company’s rental business; however, these sales can fluctuate from quarter to quarter and year to year depending on customer requirements, equipment availability and funding. For the six-month period, consolidated gross margin decreased $0.2 million from $4.2 million in 2003 to $4.0 million in 2004 with gross margin percentage decreasing slightly from 28.6% in 2003 to 28.4% in 2004.

Enviroplex’s backlog of orders as of June 30, 2004 and 2003 was $9.6 million and $9.5 million, respectively. Typically, in the California classroom market, booking activity for the first half of the year provides the most meaningful information about order levels to be produced for the entire year. In addition to Enviroplex’s backlog, MMMC has a $9.0 million sale order to provide classroom product and site related improvements to a school district during the third quarter of 2004. Beyond this single sale order, backlog is not significant in MMMC’s modular business or in TRS-RenTelco’s electronics business.

Selling and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $1.7 million (29%) and $2.4 million (21%) from the comparable 2003 periods. For the six-month period, the increase is due primarily to higher payroll and benefit costs of $1.4 million, including expenses associated with the acquired TRS operation, and $0.9 million in severance costs related to the consolidation of the Company’s electronics business into the acquired TRS facility.

Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $0.7 million (88%) and $0.5 million (35%), respectively, primarily due to the prepayment fee of $0.6 million associated with the April 2004 prepayment of the Company’s remaining $16.0 million 6.44% senior notes.

Income before provision for taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 increased $2.2 million and $3.7 million from the comparable periods in 2003, as a result of higher earnings contribution from the rental operations of MMMC and TRS-RenTelco. Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2004 increased $1.4 million to $6.1 million, or $0.49 per share, from net income of $4.7 million, or a $0.39 per share, in 2003. Net income for the six-months ended June 30, 2004 increased $2.3 million to $11.9 million, or $0.96 per share, from net income of $9.6 million, or a $0.78 per share, in 2003.

10

Liquidity and Capital Resources

This section contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. See the statements at the beginning of Item 2 for cautionary information with respect to such forward-looking statements.

For the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company’s cash flow from operations plus the proceeds from the sale of rental equipment increased $4.1 million (16%) from $24.7 million in 2003 to $28.8 million in 2004. The total cash available from operations plus rental equipment sale proceeds for the six-month period increased primarily as a result of higher earnings. During 2004, the primary uses of cash have been to acquire TRS for $118.4 million, to purchase $26.2 million of rental equipment, primarily modulars, and pay dividends of $5.1 million to the Company’s shareholders. As a result, notes payable has increased $121.2 million.

The Company had total liabilities to equity ratios of 2.08 to 1 and 1.25 to 1 as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The debt (notes payable) to equity ratios were 1.11 and 0.33 to 1 as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The Company’s credit facility related to its cash management services facilitate automatic borrowings and repayments with the bank on a daily basis depending on the Company’s cash position and allows the Company to maintain minimal cash balances. At June 30, 2004, the Company had unsecured lines of credit which expire June 30, 2007 that permit it to borrow up to $135.0 million of which $108.5 million was outstanding.

The Company has made purchases of shares of its common stock from time to time in the over-the-counter market (NASDAQ) and/or through privately negotiated, large block transactions under an authorization of the board of directors. Shares repurchased by the Company are cancelled and returned to the status of authorized but unissued stock. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, there were no repurchases. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company repurchased 462,900 shares of its outstanding common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $10.2 million (or an average price of $22.05 per share). As of August 5, 2004, 1,000,000 shares remain authorized for repurchase.

The Company believes that its needs for working capital and capital expenditures through 2004 will be adequately met by cash flow and bank borrowings.

ITEM 3. MARKET RISK

The Company currently has no material derivative financial instruments that expose the Company to significant market risk. The Company is exposed to cash flow and fair value risk due to changes in interest rates with respect to its notes payable. The Company believes that the carrying amounts for cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and notes payable approximate their fair value, except for the fixed rate debt included in notes payable which has an estimated fair value of $59.7 million compared to the recorded value of $60.0 million as of June 30, 2004. The estimate of fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt is based on the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for bank loans with similar terms and average maturities.

The Company has a portion of its revenues derived from customers located outside the United States. This requires the Company to operate internationally and maintain a presence in international markets. The Company’s international operations are subject to a number of risks. These risks include longer receivable collection periods, changes in regulatory requirements, import and export restrictions and tariffs, difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations, potentially adverse tax consequences, foreign exchange rate fluctuations, the burdens of complying with foreign laws, the impact of business cycles, economic and political instability and potential hostilities outside the United States and limited ability to enforce agreements, intellectual property rights and other rights in some foreign countries. In addition, in light of increasing global security concerns in the wake of the events of September 11, 2001, there may be additional risks of disruption to the Company’s international sales activities. Any prolonged disruption in markets in which the Company derives significant revenue may potentially have an adverse impact on the Company’s revenues and results of operations.

11

ITEM 4. CONTROLS ANDPROCEDURES

The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2004. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to their evaluation.

PART II -OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OFMATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

The Company held its 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on June 2, 2004. The proposals voted on by the Company shareholders and the voting results were as follows:

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

The election of directors was approved as follows:

Elected as directors after the meeting were William J. Dawson, Robert C. Hood, Dennis C. Kakures, Joan M. McGrath, Robert P. McGrath, Dennis P. Stradford and Ronald H. Zech.

Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors

Grant Thornton LLP was ratified as the Company’s independent auditors for fiscal year 2004 with 10,956,617 in favor, 46,048 against, 45 abstentions and 1,137,126 non-votes.

ITEM 5. OTHERINFORMATION

Dividends

On June 2, 2004, the Company declared a quarterly dividend on its Common Stock; the dividend was $0.22 per share. Subject to its continued profitability and favorable cash flow, the Company intends to continue the payment of quarterly dividends.

12

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ONFORM 8-K

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

13