UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒
Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018
or
☐
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
96 South George Street, Suite 520
York, Pennsylvania 17401
(Address of principal executive offices)
(717) 225-4711
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Commission file
number
Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter
IRS Employer
Identification No.
State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization
1-03560
P. H. Glatfelter Company
23-0628360
Pennsylvania
N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a small reporting company or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ☐ No ☒.
Common Stock outstanding on July 25, 2018 totaled 43,779,112 shares.
P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
June 30, 2018
Table of Contents
Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1
Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited)
2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited)
3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 (unaudited)
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited)
5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
6
1.
Organization
2.
Accounting Policies
3.
Proposed Acquisition
7
4.
Revenue
8
5.
Gain on Disposition of Plant, Equipment and Timberlands
6.
Earnings Per Share
9
7.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
10
8.
Income Taxes
12
9.
Stock-based Compensation
13
10.
Retirement Plans and Other Post- Retirement Benefits
14
11.
Inventories
12.
Capitalized Interest
13.
Long-term Debt
14.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
16
15.
Financial Derivatives and Hedging Activities
16.
Commitments, Contingencies and Legal Proceedings
17
17.
Segment Information
21
18.
Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
22
Item 2
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
27
Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks
37
Item 4
Controls and Procedures
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
38
Item 6
Exhibits
SIGNATURES
PART I
Item 1 – Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
Three months ended
June 30
Six months ended
In thousands, except per share
2018
2017
Net sales
$
405,773
387,342
816,420
778,055
Energy and related sales, net
944
981
2,372
2,110
Total revenues
406,717
388,323
818,792
780,165
Costs of products sold
385,114
358,588
748,283
694,801
Gross profit
21,603
29,735
70,509
85,364
Selling, general and administrative expenses
31,561
31,545
68,624
66,422
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
(579
)
(58
(2,133
(26
Operating income (loss)
(9,379
(1,752
4,018
18,968
Non-operating income (expense)
Interest expense
(5,814
(4,476
(11,009
(8,484
Interest income
26
45
80
158
Other, net
(257
98
(28
910
Total non-operating expense
(6,045
(4,333
(10,957
(7,416
Income (loss) before income taxes
(15,424
(6,085
(6,939
11,552
Income tax provision (benefit)
(8,025
(371
(5,256
5,663
Net income (loss)
(7,399
(5,714
(1,683
5,889
Earnings (loss) per share
Basic
(0.17
(0.13
(0.04
0.14
Diluted
0.13
Cash dividends declared per common share
0.26
Weighted average shares outstanding
43,770
43,604
43,735
43,593
44,449
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 2 -
GLATFELTER
06.30.18 Form 10-Q
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
In thousands
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(33,223
27,504
(20,476
33,569
Net change in:
Deferred losses on cash flow hedges, net of taxes
of $(1,719), $1,632, $(1,632) and $1,920, respectively
4,549
(3,651
2,747
(4,597
Unrecognized retirement obligations, net of taxes
of $(965), $(1,430), $(1,942) and $(2,678), respectively
3,021
2,479
6,096
4,553
Other comprehensive income (loss)
(25,653
26,332
(11,633
33,525
Comprehensive income (loss)
(33,052
20,618
(13,316
39,414
- 3 -
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
107,189
116,219
Accounts receivable, net
188,099
174,154
270,995
252,064
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
38,042
42,534
Total current assets
604,325
584,971
Plant, equipment and timberlands, net
844,467
865,743
Goodwill
80,450
82,744
Intangible assets, net
54,752
58,859
Other assets
153,103
138,478
Total assets
1,737,097
1,730,795
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current portion of long-term debt
10,982
11,298
Accounts payable
193,138
190,478
Dividends payable
5,696
5,678
Environmental liabilities
26,000
28,500
Other current liabilities
101,059
111,222
Total current liabilities
336,875
347,176
Long-term debt
510,177
470,098
Deferred income taxes
76,064
83,571
Other long-term liabilities
127,029
121,022
Total liabilities
1,050,145
1,021,867
Commitments and contingencies
—
Shareholders’ equity
Common stock
544
Capital in excess of par value
62,827
62,594
Retained earnings
957,643
948,411
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(174,606
(140,675
846,408
870,874
Less cost of common stock in treasury
(159,456
(161,946
Total shareholders’ equity
686,952
708,928
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
- 4 -
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
39,511
34,967
Amortization of debt issue costs and original issue discount
580
578
Pension expense, net of unfunded benefits paid
2,788
2,512
Deferred income tax benefit (provision)
(12,268
1,824
Share-based compensation
3,830
2,956
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable
(16,606
(12,511
(23,352
(4,750
Prepaid and other current assets
(506
(1,711
14,679
7,044
Accruals and other current liabilities
(3,799
(6,399
Other
(1,003
(1,609
Net cash provided by operating activities
28,764
Investing activities
Expenditures for purchases of plant, equipment and timberlands
(36,944
(71,047
Proceeds from disposals of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
2,384
83
(68
Net cash used by investing activities
(34,628
(70,964
Financing activities
Net borrowings under revolving credit facility
46,660
68,236
Repayment of term loans
(5,647
(4,528
Payments of dividends
(11,368
(11,130
Proceeds from government grants
125
Payments related to share-based compensation awards and other
(980
(112
Net cash provided by financing activities
28,790
52,466
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
(3,230
3,732
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(9,030
13,998
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
55,444
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period
69,442
Supplemental cash flow information
Cash paid for:
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
10,349
7,810
Income taxes, net
6,804
4,193
- 5 -
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ORGANIZATION
P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries (“Glatfelter”) is a manufacturer of specialty papers and fiber-based engineered materials. Headquartered in York, PA, U.S. operations include facilities in Fort Smith, AR, Spring Grove, PA and Chillicothe and Fremont, OH. International operations include facilities in Canada, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the Philippines, and sales and distribution offices in the U.S., Russia and China. The terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company,” or “Glatfelter,” refer to P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise. Our products are marketed worldwide, either through wholesale paper merchants, brokers and agents, or directly to customers.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (“financial statements”) include the accounts of Glatfelter and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
We prepared these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“generally accepted accounting principles” or “GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to interim financial statements. In our opinion, the financial statements reflect all normal, recurring adjustments needed to present fairly our results for the interim periods. When preparing these financial statements, we have assumed that you have read the audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Reclassification As a result of adopting the provisions of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Cost we reclassified certain amounts of periodic benefit expense for previously reported periods from Cost of products sold and Selling, general and administrative expense to Non Operating Expense. As a result of applying the ASU, Costs of products sold for the second quarter of 2017 was increased by $0.7 million and Selling, general and administrative expenses were reduced by $0.4 million and the offsetting net reclassification reduced Non-operating expense by $0.3 million. The comparable amounts for the first six months of 2017 were $2.0 million, $0.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
Accounting Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingencies as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management believes the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of these financial statements are reasonable, based upon currently available facts and known circumstances, but recognizes that actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions.
Revenue Recognition We adopted ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers in the first quarter of 2018. This ASU clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and establishes expanded disclosure requirements; however, the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09 had no impact on the timing or amount of revenue recognized for any period presented. Refer to Note 4 for additional information about the disaggregation of our net sales.
Our revenue is earned primarily from the manufacture and sale of specialty papers and engineered materials (“product sales”). Revenue is earned pursuant to contracts, supply agreements and other arrangements with a wide variety of customers. Our performance obligation is to produce a specified product according to technical specifications and, in substantially all instances, to deliver the product. Revenue from product sales is earned at a point in time. We recognize revenue on product sales when we have satisfied our performance obligation and control of the product has passed to the customer thereby entitling us to payment. With respect to substantially all arrangements for product sales, this is deemed to occur when title transfers in accordance with specified shipping terms.
The prices are fixed at the time the sales arrangement is entered into and payment terms are customary for similar arrangements in our industry. Many of our agreements include customary provisions for volume rebates, discounts and similar incentives. In addition, we are obligated for products that fail to meet agreed upon specification. Provisions for such items are estimated and recorded as sales deductions in the period in which the related revenue is recognized.
Revenue from power sales and renewable energy credits is recorded under the caption “Energy and related sales, net” in the condensed consolidated statements of income and is recognized upon fulfillment of our performance obligation which is generally upon meeting capacity commitments or delivery of REC certificates. Revenue from energy sales is recognized when electricity is delivered to the customer. Prices for power sales and renewable energy credits are fixed at the time of sale and payment is generally due within normal terms and conditions customary for the industry.
- 6 -
Certain costs associated with the production of electricity, such as fuel, labor, depreciation and maintenance are netted against energy sales for presentation on the condensed consolidated statements of income.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, “Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects From Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. (“ASU No. 2018-02”).” In December 2017, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) was passed into law and, among other provisions, reduced the statutory federal tax rate from 35% to 21%. The change in the tax rate impacted the carrying value of deferred tax assets and liabilities. ASU No. 2018-02 allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA. We elected to adopt ASU No. 2018-02 in the first quarter of 2018, and we reclassified $22.3 million of net deferred tax benefits from AOCI to retained earnings.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This ASU will require organizations such as us that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. The new guidance will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. We are in the process of assessing the impact this standard will have on us and expect to follow a modified retrospective method provided for under the standard. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have an impact on our results of operations.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments that changes the impairment model for most financial instruments, including trade receivables from an incurred loss method to a new forward-looking approach, based on expected losses. Under the new guidance, an allowance is recognized based on an estimate of expected credit losses. This standard is effective for us in the first quarter of 2020 and must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition approach. We are currently assessing the impact this standard may have on our results of operations and financial position.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities" (“ASU No. 2017-12”), which simplifies the application of hedge accounting and more closely aligns hedge accounting with an entity’s risk management strategies. ASU No. 2017-12 also amends the manner in which hedge effectiveness may be performed and changes the presentation of hedge ineffectiveness in the financial statements. ASU No. 2017-12 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. ASU No. 2017-12 requires a cumulative-effect adjustment for certain items upon adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU No. 2017-12 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
PROPOSED ACQUISITION
On June 19, 2018, we signed a definitive agreement to purchase Georgia-Pacific’s European nonwovens business (the “GP Business”) for $185 million, subject to customary purchase price adjustments. The proposed transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of required regulatory approvals.
The proposed transaction includes Georgia-Pacific’s operations located in Steinfurt, Germany, along with sales offices located in France and Italy. The Steinfurt facility produces high-quality airlaid products for the table-top, wipes, hygiene, food pad, and other nonwoven materials markets, competing in the marketplace with nonwoven technologies and substrates, as well as other materials focused primarily on consumer based end-use applications. The facility is a state-of-the-art, 32,000-metric-ton-capacity manufacturing facility that employs approximately 220 people.
In 2017, the GP Business had net sales of $99 million. The acquisition is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2018 and we plan to finance the transaction through a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
- 7 -
REVENUE
The following tables set forth disaggregated information pertaining to our net sales:
Composite Fibers
Food & beverage
70,186
65,434
140,583
128,036
Wallcovering
27,789
26,173
55,921
48,628
Technical specialties
21,609
17,676
42,567
35,383
Composite laminates
8,960
9,255
18,358
18,094
Metallized
14,390
14,599
27,102
28,100
142,934
133,137
284,531
258,241
Advanced Airlaid Materials
Feminine hygiene
46,937
44,503
95,410
86,927
Specialty wipes
10,495
6,992
18,262
13,042
Adult incontinence
5,190
3,220
9,622
6,864
Home care
3,875
3,169
7,902
5,927
6,311
4,952
11,224
9,914
72,808
62,836
142,420
122,674
Specialty Papers
Carbonless & forms
69,743
70,976
141,613
148,048
Engineered products
51,697
47,113
101,648
95,275
Envelope & converting
36,051
36,765
73,956
79,622
Book publishing
31,963
36,111
70,521
73,284
577
403
1,731
911
190,031
191,368
389,469
397,140
TOTAL
Europe, Middle East and Africa
91,790
84,041
186,572
167,588
Americas
28,992
27,477
53,040
50,536
Asia Pacific
22,152
21,619
44,919
40,117
35,905
32,404
72,133
62,133
36,310
30,011
69,128
59,932
593
421
1,159
609
188,505
190,546
386,333
395,321
1,526
822
3,136
1,819
GAINS ON DISPOSITION OF PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND TIMBERLANDS
During the first six months of 2018 and 2017 we completed the following sales of assets:
Dollars in thousands
Acres
Proceeds
Gain (loss)
Timberlands
1,029
1,785
1,680
n/a
599
453
Total
2,133
46
75
74
(48
- 8 -
EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the details of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”):
Net loss
Weighted average common shares
outstanding used in basic EPS
Common shares issuable upon
exercise of dilutive stock options
and PSAs / RSUs
outstanding and common share
equivalents used in diluted EPS
Loss per share
856
The following table sets forth potential common shares outstanding that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS for the period indicated, because their effect would be anti-dilutive:
2,393
1,327
591
- 9 -
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following table sets forth details of the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (losses) for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
Currency translation adjustments
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
Change in pensions
Change in other postretirement defined benefit plans
Balance at April 1, 2018
(29,092
(5,894
(118,428
4,461
(148,953
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (net of tax)
3,368
(29,855
Amounts reclassified from accumulated
other comprehensive income (net of tax)
1,181
3,261
(240
4,202
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance at June 30, 2018
(62,315
(1,345
(115,167
4,221
Balance at April 1, 2017
(94,383
554
(108,466
4,882
(197,413
(3,080
(106
24,318
(571
2,642
(57
2,014
(163
Balance at June 30, 2017
(66,879
(3,097
(105,824
4,719
(171,081
Balance at January 1, 2018
(41,839
(4,092
(98,295
3,551
Amount reclassified for adoption of ASU No. 2018-02
(23,297
999
(22,298
Balance as adjusted at January 1, 2018
(121,592
4,550
(162,973
151
(20,325
2,596
6,425
(329
8,692
Balance at January 1, 2017
(100,448
1,500
(110,656
4,998
(204,606
(3,335
30,128
(1,262
4,832
(173
3,397
(279
- 10 -
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income and into the condensed consolidated statements of income were as follows:
Three months ended June 30
Description
Line Item in Statements of Income
Cash flow hedges (Note 13)
(Gains) losses on cash flow hedges
1,636
(785
3,595
(1,716
Tax expense (benefit)
(455
214
(999
454
Net of tax
Retirement plan obligations (Note 8)
Amortization of deferred benefit pension plans
Prior service costs
781
708
1,561
1,412
Actuarial losses
3,523
3,311
6,913
6,133
4,304
4,019
8,474
7,545
Tax benefit
(1,043
(1,377
(2,049
(2,713
Amortization of deferred benefit other plans
(46
(91
Actuarial gains
(272
(345
(189
(318
(92
(436
(280
Tax expense
78
35
107
Total reclassifications, net of tax
- 11 -
INCOME TAXES
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) was signed into U.S. law. Among other things, the TCJA reduces the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018 and requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax on previously unremitted earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred. ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, requires companies to recognize the effect of tax law changes in the period of enactment even though the effective date for most provisions is for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017.
Given the significance of the legislation, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), which allows registrants to record provisional amounts during a one year “measurement period” similar to that used when accounting for business combinations. However, the measurement period is deemed to have ended earlier when the registrant has obtained, prepared, and analyzed the information necessary to finalize its accounting. During the measurement period, impacts of the law are expected to be recorded at the time a reasonable estimate for all or a portion of the effects can be made, and provisional amounts can be recognized and adjusted as information becomes available, prepared, or analyzed.
Our accounting for certain elements of the TCJA was incomplete as of December 31, 2017 and remains incomplete as of June 30, 2018. The TCJA includes a one-time mandatory repatriation transition tax on the net accumulated earnings and profits of a U.S. taxpayer’s foreign subsidiaries. We performed preliminary earnings and profit analysis which enabled us to make reasonable estimates of the effects and therefore, recorded provisional estimates for these items. A final determination of the TCJA’s impact remains incomplete pending a full analysis of the provisions and their final interpretation.
During early 2018, the Internal Revenue Service issued additional guidance affecting the computation of our 2017 federal income tax liability. The ultimate impact of the TCJA may differ from current estimates, and such differences could be material, due to changes in interpretations or assumptions.
While the TCJA provides for a territorial tax system, beginning in 2018, it includes the global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) provision. We elected to account for GILTI tax in the period in which it is incurred. The GILTI provisions require entities to include in its U.S. income tax return foreign subsidiary earnings in excess of an allowable return on the foreign subsidiary’s tangible assets.
For the six months ended June 30, 2018, our effective tax rate increased by approximately 10% as a result of the GILTI provisions due to our utilization of U.S. federal tax loss carryforward, which restricts our ability to recognize the associated foreign tax credits and a deduction of up to 50% of
the GILTI income. Since we are using U.S. federal tax loss carryforwards, there is no impact to cash taxes related to the GILTI provisions.
Income taxes are recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax returns. The effects of income taxes are measured based on enacted tax laws and rates.
As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had $28.2 million and $26.9 million, respectively, of gross unrecognized tax benefits. As of June 30, 2018, if such benefits were to be recognized, approximately $18.0 million would be recorded as a component of income tax expense, thereby affecting our effective tax rate.
We, or one of our subsidiaries, file income tax returns with the United States Internal Revenue Service, as well as various state and foreign authorities.
The following table summarizes, by major jurisdiction, tax years that remain subject to examination:
Open Tax Years
Jurisdiction
Examinations not yet initiated
Examination in progress
United States
Federal
2014 - 2017
State
2013 - 2017
2014 - 2016
Canada(1)
2010-2013; 2017
Germany(1)
2016 - 2017
2011 - 2015
France
2015 - 2017
2012
United Kingdom
Philippines
2015, 2017
2016
(1)
includes provincial or similar local jurisdictions, as applicable
The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, which often result in proposed assessments. Management performs a comprehensive review of its global tax positions on a quarterly basis and accrues amounts for uncertain tax positions. Based on these reviews and the result of discussions and resolutions of matters with certain tax authorities and the closure of tax years subject to tax audit, reserves are adjusted as necessary. However, future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are determined or resolved or as such statutes are closed. Due to potential for resolution of federal, state and foreign examinations, and the lapse of various statutes of limitation, it is reasonably possible our gross unrecognized tax benefits balance may decrease within the next twelve months
- 12 -
by a range of zero to $4.7 million. Substantially all of this range relates to tax positions taken in Germany and the U.S.
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense. The following table summarizes information related to interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions:
In millions
Interest expense (income)
0.2
0.3
Penalties
Accrued interest payable
1.0
0.8
9.STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The P. H. Glatfelter Amended and Restated Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) provides for the issuance of Glatfelter common stock to eligible participants in the form of restricted stock units, restricted stock awards, non-qualified stock options, performance shares, incentive stock options and performance units.
Pursuant to terms of the LTIP, we have issued to eligible participants restricted stock units, performance share awards and stock only stock appreciation rights.
Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”) and Performance Share Awards (“PSAs”) Awards of RSUs and PSAs are made under our LTIP. The RSUs vest on the passage of time, generally on a graded scale over a three, four, and five-year period, or in certain instances the RSUs were issued with five year cliff vesting. PSAs are issued to members of management and vesting is based on achievement of cumulative financial performance targets covering a two year period followed by an additional one-year service period. In addition, beginning in 2018, PSA awards include a modifier based on our three-year total shareholder return (“TSR”) relative to the TSR of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. The performance measures include a minimum, target and maximum performance level providing the grantees an opportunity to receive more or less shares than targeted depending on actual financial performance. In addition, the number of shares earned may be further increased or decreased based on our TSR relative to the S&P SmallCap 600 Index.
For RSUs, the grant date fair value of the awards, which is equal to the closing price per common share on the date of the award, is used to determine the amount of expense to be recognized over the applicable service period. For PSAs, the grant date fair value is estimated using a lattice model. The significant inputs include the stock price, volatility, dividend yield, and risk free rate of return. Settlement of RSUs and
PSAs will be made in shares of our common stock currently held in treasury.
The following table summarizes RSU and PSA activity during periods indicated:
Units
Balance at January 1,
929,386
679,038
Granted
389,065
364,748
Forfeited
(70,891
(91,449
Shares delivered
(150,020
(24,052
Balance at June 30,
1,097,540
928,285
The amount granted in 2018 and 2017 includes 183,355 and 163,274, respectively, of PSAs exclusive of reinvested dividends.
The following table sets forth aggregate RSU and PSA compensation expense for the periods indicated:
1,651
1,049
3,455
2,088
Stock Only Stock Appreciation Rights (“SOSARs”) Under terms of the SOSAR, a recipient receives the right to a payment in the form of shares of common stock equal to the difference, if any, in the fair market value of one share of common stock at the time of exercising the SOSAR and the exercise price. The SOSARs vest ratably over a three year period and have a term of ten years. No SOSARs were awarded during the first six months of 2018 or 2017.
The following table sets forth information related to outstanding SOSARS for the six months ended June 30;
SOSARS
Shares
Wtd Avg
Exercise
Price
Outstanding at January 1,
2,561,846
17.87
2,736,616
17.64
Exercised
(148,145
13.26
(33,050
14.65
Canceled / forfeited
(20,994
18.76
(17,630
18.46
Outstanding at June 30,
2,392,707
18.15
2,685,936
17.67
The following table sets forth SOSAR compensation expense for the periods indicated:
70
259
249
868
- 13 -
RETIREMENT PLANS AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The following tables provide information with respect to the net periodic costs of our pension and post-retirement medical benefit plans.
Pension Benefits
Service cost
2,649
Interest cost
5,626
5,989
Expected return on plan assets
(10,722
(10,666
Amortization of prior service
cost
Amortization of unrecognized
loss
Total net periodic benefit cost
1,955
1,991
Other Benefits
238
284
410
513
Amortization of prior
service credit
Amortization of
actuarial gain
Total net periodic
benefit cost
330
705
5,606
5,370
11,215
11,896
(21,561
(21,497
3,734
3,314
545
579
861
998
970
1,297
In the first quarter of 2018, we adopted the provisions of ASU No. 2017-07 which requires entities to present the service cost component of net periodic benefit costs in operating profit along with other employee compensation costs. All other components of net periodic benefit costs are to be presented below the determination of operating income in “Other, net”.
INVENTORIES
Inventories, net of reserves, were as follows:
Raw materials
65,426
60,806
In-process and finished
127,311
116,678
Supplies
78,258
74,580
CAPITALIZED INTEREST
The following table sets forth details of interest incurred, capitalized and expensed:
Interest cost incurred
5,814
4,880
11,405
9,477
Interest capitalized
-
404
396
993
4,476
11,009
8,484
Capitalized interest primarily relates to spending for the Airlaid capacity expansion project in 2017 and 2018 and the Specialty Papers’ environmental compliance project in 2017.
LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt is summarized as follows:
Revolving credit facility, due Mar. 2020
217,860
171,200
5.375% Notes, due Oct. 2020
250,000
2.40% Term Loan, due Jun. 2022
6,661
7,710
2.05% Term Loan, due Mar. 2023
29,556
33,607
1.30% Term Loan, due Jun. 2023
8,327
9,423
1.55% Term Loan, due Sep. 2025
10,356
11,390
Total long-term debt
522,760
483,330
Less current portion
(10,982
(11,298
Unamortized deferred issuance costs
(1,601
(1,934
Long-term debt, net of current portion
On March 12, 2015, we amended our revolving credit agreement with a consortium of banks (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) which increased the amount available for borrowing
- 14 -
to $400 million, extended the maturity of the facility to March 12, 2020, and instituted a revised interest rate pricing grid. On February 1, 2017, the Revolving Credit Facility was further amended to, among other, change the definition of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for purposes of calculating covenant compliance.
For all US dollar denominated borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, the borrowing rate is, at our option, either, (a) the bank’s base rate which is equal to the greater of i) the prime rate; ii) the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points; or iii) the daily Euro-rate plus 100 basis points plus an applicable spread over either i), ii) or iii) ranging from 12.5 basis points to 100 basis points based on the Company’s leverage ratio and its corporate credit ratings determined by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services and Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (the “Corporate Credit Rating”); or (b) the daily Euro-rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 112.5 basis points to 200 basis points based on the Company’s leverage ratio and the Corporate Credit Rating. For non-US dollar denominated borrowings, interest is based on (b) above.
The Revolving Credit Facility contains a number of customary covenants for financings of this type that, among other things, restrict our ability to dispose of or create liens on assets, incur additional indebtedness, repay other indebtedness, limits certain intercompany financing arrangements, make acquisitions and engage in mergers or consolidations. We are also required to comply with specified financial tests and ratios including: i) maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio (the “leverage ratio”); and ii) a consolidated EBITDA to interest expense ratio. The most restrictive of our covenants is a maximum leverage ratio of 3.5x. As of June 30, 2018, the leverage ratio, as calculated in accordance with the definition in our amended credit agreement, was 3.1x. A breach of these requirements would give rise to certain remedies under the Revolving Credit Facility, among which are the termination of the agreement and accelerated repayment of the outstanding borrowings plus accrued and unpaid interest under the credit facility.
On October 3, 2012, we completed a private placement offering of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “5.375% Notes”). The 5.375% Notes, which are publically registered, are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by PHG Tea Leaves, Inc., Mollanvick, Inc., Glatfelter Composite Fibers N. A., Inc., Glatfelter Advanced Materials N.A., LLC., and Glatfelter Holdings, LLC (the “Guarantors”). Interest on the 5.375% Notes is payable semiannually in arrears on April 15 and October 15.
The 5.375% Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after October 15, 2016 at the redemption prices specified in the applicable Indenture. These Notes and the guarantees of the notes are senior obligations of the Company and the Guarantors, respectively, rank equally in right of
payment with future senior indebtedness of the Company and the Guarantors and will mature on October 15, 2020.
The 5.375% Notes contain various covenants customary to indebtedness of this nature including limitations on i) the amount of indebtedness that may be incurred; ii) certain restricted payments including common stock dividends; iii) distributions from certain subsidiaries; iv) sales of assets; v) transactions amongst subsidiaries; and vi) incurrence of liens on assets. In addition, the 5.375% Notes contain cross default provisions that could result in all such notes becoming due and payable in the event of a failure to repay debt outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility at maturity or a default under the Revolving Credit Facility that accelerates the debt outstanding thereunder. As of June 30, 2018, we met all of the requirements of our debt covenants.
Glatfelter Gernsbach GmbH & Co. KG (“Gernsbach”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, entered into a series of borrowing agreements with IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, Düsseldorf (“IKB”) as summarized below:
Amounts in thousands
Original
Principal
Interest
Rate
Maturity
Borrowing date
Apr. 11, 2013
€
42,700
2.05
%
Mar. 2023
Sep. 4, 2014
10,000
2.40
Jun. 2022
Oct. 10, 2015
2,608
1.55
Sep. 2025
Apr. 26, 2016
1.30
Jun. 2023
May 4, 2016
7,195
Each of the borrowings require quarterly repayments of principal and interest and provide for representations, warranties and covenants customary for financings of these types. The financial covenants contained in each of the IKB loans, which relate to the minimum ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense and the maximum ratio of consolidated total net debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA, are calculated by reference to our Revolving Credit Facility.
P. H. Glatfelter Company guarantees all debt obligations of its subsidiaries. All such obligations are recorded in these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Letters of credit issued to us by certain financial institutions totaled $5.2 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. The letters of credit, which reduce amounts available under our revolving credit facility, primarily provide financial assurances for the benefit of certain state workers compensation insurance agencies in conjunction with our self-insurance program. We bear the credit risk on this amount to the extent that we do not comply with the provisions of certain agreements. No amounts are outstanding under the letters of credit.
- 15 -
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The amounts reported on the condensed consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value. The following table sets forth carrying value and fair value of long-term debt:
December 31, 2017
Carrying
Value
Fair Value
Variable rate debt
Fixed-rate bonds
252,375
253,823
2.40% Term loan
6,813
7,889
2.05% Term loan
30,032
34,122
1.30% Term Loan
8,302
9,370
1.55% Term loan
10,323
11,320
525,705
487,724
As of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, we had $250.0 million of 5.375% fixed rate bonds. These bonds are publicly registered, but thinly traded. The fair value of financial derivatives is set forth below in Note 15.
FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
As part of our overall risk management practices, we enter into financial derivatives primarily designed to either i) hedge foreign currency risks associated with forecasted transactions (“cash flow hedges”); or ii) mitigate the impact that changes in currency exchange rates have on intercompany financing transactions and foreign currency denominated receivables and payables (“foreign currency hedges”).
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments - Cash Flow Hedges We use currency forward contracts as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to fluctuations in the currency exchange rates on certain forecasted production costs or capital expenditures expected to be incurred. Currency forward contracts involve fixing the exchange for delivery of a specified amount of foreign currency on a specified date. As of June 30, 2018, the maturity of currency forward contracts ranged from one month to 18 months.
We designate certain currency forward contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted raw material purchases, certain production costs or capital expenditures with exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of foreign exchange risk is deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. With respect to hedges of forecasted raw material purchases or production costs, the amount deferred is subsequently reclassified into costs of products sold in the period that inventory produced using the hedged transaction affects earnings. For hedged capital
expenditures, deferred gains or losses are reclassified and included in the historical cost of the capital asset and subsequently affect earnings as depreciation is recognized. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is recognized directly to earnings and reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income as non-operating income (expense) under the caption “Other, net.”
We had the following outstanding derivatives that were used to hedge foreign exchange risks associated with forecasted transactions and designated as hedging instruments:
June 30 2018
December 31 2017
Derivative
Sell/Buy - sell notional
Philippine Peso / British Pound
19,047
Euro / British Pound
12,230
13,586
Euro / U.S. Dollar
1,048
U.S. Dollar / Euro
349
946
Sell/Buy - buy notional
Euro / Philippine Peso
1,031,730
890,096
British Pound / Philippine Peso
767,306
797,496
1,310
4,253
68,673
60,519
U.S. Dollar / Canadian Dollar
32,280
32,265
British Pound / Euro
335
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments - Foreign Currency Hedges We also entered into forward foreign exchange contracts to mitigate the impact changes in currency exchange rates have on balance sheet monetary assets and liabilities. None of these contracts are designated as hedges for financial accounting purposes and, accordingly, changes in value of the foreign exchange forward contracts and in the offsetting underlying on-balance-sheet transactions are reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income under the caption “Other, net.”
The following sets forth derivatives used to mitigate the impact changes in currency exchange rates have on balance sheet monetary assets and liabilities:
U.S. Dollar / British Pound
22,500
17,500
1,000
Canadian / U.S. dollar
2,500
6,000
4,500
9,000
13,000
- 16 -
These contracts have maturities of one month from the date originally entered into.
Fair Value Measurements The following table summarizes the fair values of derivative instruments for the period indicated and the line items in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets where the instruments are recorded:
Prepaid Expenses
and Other
Balance sheet caption
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Designated as hedging:
Forward foreign currency
exchange contracts
1,085
1,066
1,419
4,787
Not designated as hedging:
351
422
43
The amounts set forth in the table above represent the net asset or liability giving effect to rights of offset with each counterparty. The effect of netting the amounts presented above did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position.
The following table summarizes the amount of income or (loss) from derivative instruments recognized in our results of operations for the periods indicated and the line items in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income where the results are recorded:
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts:
Effective portion – cost of products sold
(1,636
785
(3,595
1,716
Ineffective portion – other – net
110
36
(212
86
exchange contracts:
Other – net
(898
370
(601
391
The impact of activity not designated as hedging was substantially all offset by the remeasurement of the underlying on-balance-sheet item.
The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
The fair values of the foreign exchange forward contracts are considered to be Level 2. Foreign currency forward contracts are valued using foreign currency forward and interest rate curves. The fair value of each contract is determined by comparing the contract rate to the forward rate and discounting to present value. Contracts in a gain position are recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets under the caption “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and the value of contracts in a loss position is recorded under the caption “Other current liabilities.”
A rollforward of fair value amounts recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:
(5,640
1,882
Deferred (losses) gains
on cash flow hedges
288
(4,801
Reclassified to earnings
(1,757
(4,635
We expect substantially all of the amounts recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income will be recorded as a component of the capital asset or realized in results of operations within the next 12 to 18 months and the amount ultimately recognized will vary depending on actual market rates.
Credit risk related to derivative activity arises in the event the counterparty fails to meet its obligations to us. This exposure is generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which the counterparty’s obligations exceed our obligation to them. Our policy is to enter into contracts only with financial institutions which meet certain minimum credit ratings.
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Fox River - Neenah, Wisconsin
Background. We have significant uncertainties associated with environmental claims arising out of the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) in sediments in the lower Fox River, on which our former Neenah facility was located, and in the Bay of Green Bay Wisconsin (collectively, the “Site”). Since the early 1990s, the United States, the State of Wisconsin and two Indian tribes (collectively, the “Governments”) have pursued a cleanup of a 39-mile stretch of river from Little Lake Butte des Morts into Green Bay and natural resource damages (“NRDs”).
- 17 -
The Site has been subject to certain studies, demonstration projects and interim cleanups. The permanent cleanup, known as a “remedial action” under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), consists of sediment dredging, installation of engineered caps and placement of sand covers in various areas in the bed of the river.
The United States originally notified several entities that they were potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”); however, after giving effect to settlements reached with the Governments, the remaining PRPs exposed to continuing obligations to implement the remainder of the cleanup consist of us, Georgia Pacific Consumer Products, L.P. (“Georgia Pacific”) and NCR Corporation (“NCR”).
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has divided the Site into five “operable units”, including the most upstream portion of the Site on which our facility was located (“OU1”) and four downstream reaches of the river and bay (“OU2-5”).
We and WTM I Company (“WTM I”), one of the PRPs, implemented the remedial action in OU1 under a consent decree with the Governments; Menasha Corporation made a financial contribution to that work. That project began in 2004 and the work is complete, other than on-going monitoring and maintenance.
For OU2-5, work has proceeded primarily under a Unilateral Administrative Order (“UAO”) issued in November 2007 by the EPA to us and seven other respondents. The majority of that work to date has been funded or conducted by parties other than us. Prior to the UAO, we contributed to a project in that area. Since the issuance of the UAO we have conducted about $13.4 million of cleanup work under the UAO in 2015 and 2016. The cleanup is expected to continue through 2019. However, as discussed below, under a consent decree between the United States, Wisconsin, NCR and Appvion, we are not responsible for any additional cleanup at the Site.
Litigation and Settlement. In 2008, in an allocation action, NCR and Appvion sued us and many other defendants in an effort to allocate among the liable parties the costs of cleaning up this Site and compensating the Governments for their costs and the natural resource trustees for NRDs. This case has been called the “Whiting litigation.” After several summary judgment rulings and a trial, the trial court entered judgment in the Whiting Litigation allocating to NCR 100% of the costs of (a) the OU2-5 cleanup, (b) NRDs, (c) past and future costs incurred by the Governments in OU2-5, and (d) past and future costs incurred by any of the other parties net of an appropriate equitable adjustment for insurance recoveries.
On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling, holding
that if knowledge and fault were the only equitable factors governing allocation of costs and NRDs at the Site, NCR would owe 100% of all costs and damages in OU2-5, but would not have a share of costs in OU1 -- which is upstream of the outfall of the facilities for which NCR is responsible -- solely as an “arranger for disposal” of PCB-containing waste paper by recycling it at our mill. However, the court of appeals vacated the judgment and remanded the case for the district court’s further consideration of whether any other equitable factors might cause the district court to alter its allocation to something less than 100% to NCR.
In 2010, in an enforcement action, the Governments sued us and other defendants for (a) an injunction to require implementation of the cleanup ordered by the 2007 UAO, (b) recovery of the Governments’ past and future costs of response, (c) recovery of NRDs, and (d) recovery of a declaration of liability for the Site. After appeals, the Governments did not obtain an injunction and they withdrew their claims for NRDs. The Governments obtained a declaration of our liability to comply with the 2007 UAO. The Governments’ costs claims remained pending.
On January 17, 2017, the United States filed a consent decree with the federal district court among the United States, Wisconsin, NCR, and Appvion (the “NCR/Appvion consent decree”) under which NCR would agree to complete the remaining cleanup and both NCR and Appvion would agree not to seek to recover from us or anyone else any amounts they have spent or will spend, and we and others would be barred from seeking claims against NCR or Appvion. On March 29, 2017, the United States moved for entry of a somewhat revised version of the NCR/Appvion consent decree, which the federal district court entered on August 23, 2017. Under the consent decree, if it were to withstand appeal, we would only face exposure to: (i) government past oversight costs, (ii) government future oversight costs, (iii) long term monitoring and maintenance, and (iv) depending on the reason, a further remedy if necessary in the event the currently ordered remedy fails, over 30 or more years, to achieve its objectives. As the result of earlier settlements, Georgia Pacific is only jointly liable with us to the Governments for monitoring and maintenance costs incurred in the most downstream three miles of the river (“OU4b”) and the bay of Green Bay (“OU5”).
In addition, we and Georgia Pacific had claims against each other to reallocate the costs that we have each incurred or will incur. We have settled those claims. Under this settlement, Georgia Pacific has agreed to implement the monitoring and maintenance in OU4b and OU5 and we would be responsible for monitoring and maintenance of all other upstream Operable Units. We paid Georgia Pacific $9.5 million in August 2017.
The NCR/Appvion consent decree and our settlement with Georgia Pacific resulted in all claims among the
- 18 -
responsible parties being barred, waived, or withdrawn. Accordingly, on October 10, 2017, the federal district court approved a stipulation dismissing all remaining claims in the Whiting litigation. Therefore, unless certain limited circumstances occur permitting reassertion of claims, we are not subject to claims for reallocation of costs or damages incurred by any of the other parties and we cannot seek contribution or reallocation from them.
On October 20, 2017, we appealed the district court’s approval of the NCR/Appvion consent decree. We contend that the court did not do what was required to properly conclude that the NCR/Appvion consent decree was substantially fair to us. We contend that the consent decree was unfair to us because the costs we have already incurred and the costs that we would have to incur were the NCR/Appvion consent decree to remain in effect would exceed our fair share of costs for this site. If we prevail on appeal, the circumstances that caused us to prevail would lead us to anticipate that, while all costs would again be subject to reallocation, that reallocation would be in our favor.
Cost estimates. The proposed NCR/Appvion consent decree, as revised, states that all parties combined have spent more than $1 billion through March 2017 towards remedial actions and NRDs, of which we have contributed approximately $75 million. In addition, work to complete the remaining site remedy under the UAO was anticipated to cost approximately $200 million at the beginning of the 2017 remediation season. We believe NCR to have completed a full season of work in 2017 and to working during the 2018 season. So long as the NCR/Appvion consent decree remains in effect, we are not exposed to reallocation of any of those amounts, and no other party will be exposed to reallocation of any of the amounts that we have incurred or may incur in the future.
So long as the NCR/Appvion consent decree remains in effect, we (and not NCR) would remain responsible for the Governments’ unreimbursed past costs. Many parties have entered into settlements with the Governments over time, including us, that have called for payments of cash or in-kind provision of natural resource restoration projects. Certain amounts were allocated to the United States and the State to reimburse their costs, and other amounts were allocated to the Natural Resource Damages Assessment and Restoration (“NRDAR”) Fund to pay for natural resource damages assessment, if any, and restoration projects. The Governments may not recover costs from us that anyone has reimbursed previously. As of the end of 2015, the United States claims to have incurred about $32.7 million in unreimbursed recoverable costs including prejudgment interest, an amount that we dispute. The State had no unreimbursed recoverable costs, and now claims to have had on hand approximately $4.6 million of unspent settlement money, a claim that we also dispute. Further, the NRDAR Fund had received what the Governments claim to have been approximately $105 million
in settlement payments, of which more than $60 million remained unspent. On February 5, 2018, the district court decided that the Governments’ recovery of costs would be reduced by the funds held by the State at the end of 2015 and by any amount by which the Governments had applied settlement payments to natural resource damages in excess of the actual amount of natural resource damages. The Governments moved for reconsideration. On July 13, 2018, the district court denied that motion, holding that the United States’ right to recover should be reduced by (a) the amount by which the $105 million of settlement payments accounted as a recovery of NRDs exceeded the actual NRDs and (b) the amounts held as a balance by the State that the State has not subsequently spent. Both of those would be the subject of a trial. The Governments have requested permission to appeal that determination. We contend that the natural resource restoration projects already constructed fully compensate the public for any natural resource damages, and therefore that the entire unspent balance in the NRDAR Fund remains as an offset, an amount likely to exceed all of the Governments’ past and future costs of response. No date has yet been set for trial of the issue. If at trial the actual amount of NRDs were determined to be more than the Governments have collected in settlements, we might be exposed to that shortfall.
So long as the NCR/Appvion consent decree remains in effect, we would also remain subject to our remaining obligations under the OU1 consent decree, which now consist of long term monitoring and maintenance that we expect earlier contributions to the OU1 escrow account to fund these costs. Furthermore, we, along with Georgia Pacific, but not NCR, would be responsible for long term monitoring and maintenance required pursuant to the Lower Fox River 100% Remedial Design Report dated December 2009 – Long Term Monitoring Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan requires long term monitoring of each of OU2 through OU5 over a period of at least 30 years. The monitoring activities consist of, among others, testing fish tissue, sampling water quality and sediment, and inspections of the engineered caps. Each operable unit is required to be monitored; however, because of our settlement with Georgia Pacific, our obligations are in OU1-OU4a. In the first quarter of 2018, we entered into a fixed-price, 30 year agreement with a third party for the performance of all of our monitoring and maintenance obligations in OU1 through the upper four miles of OU4 (“OU4a”) with limited exceptions, such as, for extraordinary amounts of cap maintenance or replacement. Our obligation under this agreement is included in our total reserve for the Site. The portion of this agreement that pertains to OU1 will be paid out of the previously funded OU1 escrow account.
We and WTM I executed documents for the withdrawal of WTM I from the entity we jointly formed for the performance of the OU1 work and for the release of all claims between us related to the Site, which was approved by the court overseeing WTM I’s bankruptcy in May 2018. As a result of this action, we assumed WTM I’s portion of the OU1
- 19 -
escrow account totaling approximately $4.7 million, which is included under the caption “Other assets” on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2018 and have increased our reserve for Fox River by an equal amount for potential liabilities associated with the river that we believe may ultimately be satisfied with funds from the escrow account.
Reserves for the Site. Our reserve for all remaining claims against us relating to PCB contamination is set forth below:
43,144
52,788
Payments
(2,708
(128
Assumption of WTM I escrow
4,746
Accretion
66
45,248
52,660
The payments set forth above primarily represent cash paid under the recently-entered long-term monitoring and maintenance agreement. Of our total reserve for the Fox River, $26.0 million is recorded in the accompanying March 31, 2018 condensed consolidated balance sheet under the caption “Environmental liabilities” and the remaining $19.2 million is recorded under the caption “Other long term liabilities.”
Range of Reasonably Possible Outcomes. Based on our analysis of all available information, including but not limited to decisions of the courts, official documents such as records of decision, discussions with legal counsel, cost estimates for future monitoring and maintenance and other post-remediation costs to be performed at the Site, we believe it is reasonably possible that our costs associated with the Fox River matter could exceed the aggregate amounts accrued by amounts ranging from insignificant to approximately $30 million. We believe the likelihood of an outcome in the upper end of the monetary range is less than other possible outcomes within the range and the possibility of an outcome in excess of the upper end of the monetary range is remote.
Summary. Our current assessment is we will be able to manage this environmental matter without a long-term, material adverse impact on the Company. This matter could, however, at any particular time or for any particular year or years, have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity and/or results of operations or could result in a default under our debt covenants. Moreover, there can be no assurance our reserves will be adequate to provide for future obligations related to this matter, or our share of costs and/or damages will not exceed our available resources, or those obligations will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations and might result in a default under our loan covenants.
- 20 -
SEGMENT INFORMATION
The following tables set forth financial and other information by business unit for the period indicated:
Advanced Airlaid
Other and
Dollars in millions
Materials
Unallocated
142.9
133.1
72.8
62.8
190.0
191.4
405.8
387.3
0.9
Total revenue
190.9
192.4
406.7
388.3
Cost of products sold
118.0
107.6
53.0
200.6
195.6
3.7
2.4
385.1
358.6
Gross profit (loss)
24.9
25.5
10.0
9.8
(9.7
(3.2
(3.7
(2.4
21.6
29.7
SG&A
11.7
10.8
2.3
11.2
10.3
6.3
8.1
31.6
31.5
(Gains) losses on dispositions of plant,
equipment and timberlands, net
(0.6
Total operating income (loss)
13.2
14.7
7.6
7.5
(20.9
(13.5
(9.4
(10.5
(1.8
Non-operating expense
(6.0
(4.3
(15.4
(14.8
(6.1
Supplementary Data
Net tons sold (thousands)
40.4
41.9
27.0
173.2
184.1
240.6
251.5
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
7.2
7.0
3.5
8.2
7.7
1.2
0.7
20.1
17.7
Capital expenditures
2.8
2.1
2.5
12.9
4.5
15.8
0.6
10.4
34.3
Six months ended June 30
284.5
258.2
142.4
122.7
389.5
397.1
816.4
778.1
391.9
399.2
818.8
780.2
232.7
207.2
122.5
103.5
387.1
375.6
6.0
8.5
748.3
694.8
51.8
51.0
19.9
19.2
4.8
23.6
(8.5
70.5
85.4
23.3
21.9
5.1
4.6
16.9
16.3
68.6
66.4
(2.1
28.5
29.1
14.8
14.6
(18.5
---
(20.8
(24.7
4.0
19.0
(11.0
(7.4
(31.8
(32.1
(6.9
11.6
80.5
80.7
53.3
50.3
361.6
381.4
495.4
512.4
13.8
14.9
1.7
39.5
35.0
7.9
6.8
15.6
23.5
11.0
34.0
6.7
36.9
71.0
The sum of individual amounts set forth above may not agree to the consolidated financial statements included herein due to rounding.
Business Units Results of individual business units are presented based on our management accounting practices and management structure. There is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for management accounting equivalent to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; therefore, the financial results of individual business units are not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other company. The management accounting process uses assumptions and allocations to measure performance of the business units. Methodologies are refined from time to time as management accounting practices are enhanced and businesses change. The costs incurred by support areas not directly aligned with the business unit are allocated primarily based on an estimated utilization of support area services or are included in “Other and Unallocated” in the Business Unit Performance table.
Management evaluates results of operations of the business units before retirement expenses, certain corporate level costs, and the effects of certain gains or losses not considered to be related to the core business operations. Management believes that this is a more meaningful representation of the operating performance of its core businesses, the profitability of business units and the extent of cash flow generated from these core operations. Such amounts are presented under the caption “Other and Unallocated.” In the evaluation of business unit results, management does not use any measures of total assets. This presentation is aligned with the management and operating structure of our company. It is also on this basis that the Company’s performance is evaluated internally and by the Company’s Board of Directors.
- 21 -
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our 5.375% Notes issued by P. H. Glatfelter Company (the “Parent”) are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by certain of our 100%-owned domestic subsidiaries, PHG Tea Leaves, Inc., Mollanvick, Inc., Glatfelter Composite Fibers N. A., Inc. (“CFNA”), Glatfelter Advance Materials N.A., Inc. (“GAMNA”), and Glatfelter Holdings, LLC. The guarantees are subject to certain customary release provisions including i) the designation of such subsidiary as an unrestricted or excluded subsidiary; (ii) in connection with any sale or disposition of the capital stock of the subsidiary guarantor; or (iii) upon our exercise of our legal defeasance option or our covenant defeasance option, all of which are more fully described in the Indenture dated as of October 3, 2012 and the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 27, 2015, among us, the Guarantors and US Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 5.375% Notes.
The following presents our condensed consolidating statements of income, including comprehensive income, for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, our condensed consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and our condensed consolidating cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the three months ended June 30, 2018
Parent
Company
Guarantors
Non
Adjustments/
Eliminations
Consolidated
190,032
32,319
208,579
(25,157
190,976
203,339
31,097
175,835
(12,363
1,222
32,744
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
16,971
(332
14,922
(Gain) loss on dispositions of plant
(22
(565
(29,312
2,119
17,814
Other non-operating
income (expense)
(6,389
(585
(446
1,606
133
1,446
53
(1,606
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
14,971
12,707
(27,678
1,532
529
(2,318
Total other non-operating
10,247
14,097
(2,711
(19,065
16,216
15,103
(11,666
1,267
2,374
14,949
12,729
(28,587
(28,149
56,736
(13,638
(15,420
29,058
- 22 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the six months ended June 30, 2018
389,471
52,332
424,714
(50,097
391,843
394,504
49,362
354,514
(2,661
2,970
70,200
37,408
1,673
29,543
(460
(1,680
(39,609
2,977
40,650
(12,071
(1,040
(874
2,976
279
2,690
87
(2,976
36,204
34,962
(71,166
(881
(2,734
3,587
23,531
33,878
2,800
(16,078
36,855
43,450
(14,395
673
8,466
36,182
34,984
(17,551
(16,114
33,665
18,631
18,870
(37,501
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the three months ended June 30, 2017
191,370
23,052
194,708
(21,788
192,351
196,145
22,047
162,184
(3,794
1,005
32,524
16,421
236
14,888
(74
(20,231
843
17,636
(5,182
(206
(437
1,349
142
1,237
15
(1,349
18,801
19,249
(38,050
(2,319
14,542
17,961
1,214
(5,689
18,804
18,850
25
(399
Other comprehensive income
23,964
23,371
(47,335
Comprehensive income
42,765
42,620
(85,385
- 23 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the six months ended June 30, 2017
397,141
42,585
380,595
(42,266
399,251
381,391
40,633
315,043
17,860
1,952
65,552
36,583
310
29,529
48
(18,771
36,023
(9,843
(319
(941
2,619
291
2,398
88
(2,619
32,418
33,101
(65,519
2,365
(4,525
3,070
25,231
30,655
2,217
Income before income taxes
6,460
32,371
38,240
571
(47
5,139
Net income
29,066
28,385
(57,451
61,484
61,486
(122,970
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2018
1,201
1,729
104,259
Other current assets
262,122
256,018
295,167
(316,171
497,136
367,703
86,461
390,303
Investments in subsidiaries
837,670
652,335
(1,490,005
144,794
143,511
288,305
1,613,490
996,543
933,240
(1,806,176
Current liabilities
422,603
81,975
148,468
394,462
67,000
48,715
3,201
18,542
54,321
106,272
485
20,272
926,538
168,002
271,776
828,541
661,464
- 24 -
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017
1,292
720
114,207
249,293
217,822
279,626
(277,989
468,752
375,231
80,992
409,520
829,895
653,128
(1,483,023
139,552
140,529
280,081
1,595,263
952,662
943,882
(1,761,012
402,787
54,640
167,738
368,496
51,000
50,602
14,081
16,814
52,676
100,971
313
19,738
886,335
122,767
290,754
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2018
Net cash provided (used) by
(4,089
(114
24,241
(20,000
(13,414
(12,902
(10,628
598
1
Advances of intercompany loans
(3,445
3,445
Intercompany capital contributed
(315
315
Intercompany capital returned
20,000
Total investing activities
(12,884
5,123
(10,627
(16,240
Net borrowings (repayments) of long-term debt
25,660
16,000
(647
41,013
Payment of dividends to shareholders
Borrowings of intercompany loans
Intercompany capital received
Payment of intercompany dividend
Total financing activities
16,882
(4,000
(20,332
36,240
Effect of exchange rate on cash
Net increase (decrease) in cash
1,009
(9,948
Cash at the beginning of period
Cash at the end of period
- 25 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017
(12,072
(1,085
42,606
(685
(40,739
(21,421
(8,887
Repayments from intercompany loans
12,000
(12,000
(12,550
12,550
(400
400
(40,731
(22,296
950
55,000
25,000
(16,292
63,708
Repayments of intercompany loans
685
56,308
(28,577
(265
Net increase in cash
3,505
1,619
8,874
5,082
1,461
48,901
8,587
3,080
57,775
- 26 -
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein and Glatfelter’s Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Forward-Looking Statements This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding industry prospects and future consolidated financial position or results of operations, made in this Report on Form 10-Q are forward looking. We use words such as “anticipates”, “believes”, “expects”, “future”, “intends” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Our actual results may differ significantly from such expectations. The following discussion includes forward-looking statements regarding expectations of, among others, shipping volumes, selling prices, input costs, non-cash pension expense, environmental costs, capital expenditures and liquidity, all of which are inherently difficult to predict. Although we make such statements based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. Accordingly, we identify the following important factors, among others, which could cause our results to differ from any results that might be projected, forecasted or estimated in any such forward-looking statements:
i.
variations in demand for our products including the impact of unplanned market-related downtime, variations in product pricing, or product substitution;
ii.
the impact of competition, both domestic and international, changes in industry production capacity, including the construction of new mills or new machines, the closing of mills and incremental changes due to capital expenditures or productivity increases;
iii.
risks associated with our international operations, including local economic and political environments and fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
iv.
geopolitical events, including the impact of conflicts in Russia, Ukraine and Philippines;
v.
our ability to develop new, high value-added products;
vi.
changes in the price or availability of raw materials we use, in particular pulpwood, pulp, pulp substitutes, synthetic pulp, colorformers, caustic soda, and abaca fiber;
vii.
changes in energy-related prices and commodity raw materials with an energy component;
viii.
the impact of unplanned production interruption;
ix.
disruptions in production and/or increased costs due to labor disputes;
x.
the impact of exposure to volatile market-based pricing for sales of excess electricity;
xi.
the gain or loss of significant customers and/or on-going viability of such customers;
xii.
cost and other effects of environmental compliance, cleanup, damages, remediation or restoration, or personal injury or property damages related thereto, such as the costs of natural resource restoration or damages related to the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls ("PCBs") in the lower Fox River on which our former Neenah mill was located;
xiii.
adverse results in litigation in the Fox River matter;
xiv.
the impact of war and terrorism;
xv.
the impact of unfavorable outcomes of audits by various state, federal or international tax authorities or changes in pre-tax income and its impact on the valuation of deferred taxes;
xvi.
enactment of adverse state, federal or foreign tax or other legislation or changes in government policy or regulation; and
xvii.
our ability to finance, consummate and integrate acquisitions.
Introduction We manufacture a wide array of specialty papers and engineered materials. We manage our company along three business units:
•
Composite Fibers with revenue from the sale of single-serve tea and coffee filtration papers, nonwoven wallcovering base materials, metallized products, composite laminate papers, and many technically special papers including substrates for electrical applications;
Advanced Airlaid Materials with revenue from the sale of airlaid nonwoven fabric-like materials used in feminine hygiene and adult incontinence products, specialty wipes, home care products and other airlaid applications; and
Specialty Papers with revenue from the sale of papers for carbonless and other forms, envelopes, book publishing, and engineered products such as papers for high-speed ink jet printing, office specialty products, greeting cards, packaging, casting, release, transfer, playing card, postal, FDA-compliant food, and other niche specialty applications.
- 27 -
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Six months ended June 30, 2018 versus the six months ended June 30, 2017
Overview For the first six months of 2018 we reported a net loss of $1.7 million, or $0.04 per share compared with net income of $5.9 million and $0.13 per diluted share in the year earlier period. Adjusted earnings for the first six months of 2018 were $4.3 million, or $0.10 per diluted share compared with $14.5 million, or $0.33 per diluted share, for the same period a year ago. Our consolidated results in the first six months of 2018 were adversely impacted by rising input costs outpacing the realization of higher selling prices by $13.9 million, net. Advanced Airlaid Materials’ and Specialty Papers’ results were adversely impacted by higher depreciation expense related to the capacity expansion and environmental compliance projects, respectively. Specialty Papers’ results were also adversely impacted by higher costs of annual maintenance outages.
The following table sets forth summarized consolidated results of operations:
Operating income
In addition to the results reported in accordance with GAAP, we evaluate our performance using adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share. We disclose this information to allow investors to evaluate our performance exclusive of certain items that impact the comparability of results from period to period and we believe it is helpful in understanding underlying operating trends and cash flow generation. Adjusted earnings consists of net income determined in accordance with GAAP adjusted to exclude the impact of the following:
Costs related to strategic initiatives. These adjustments primarily reflect one-time professional and legal fees incurred directly related to evaluating certain strategic initiatives.
Airlaid capacity expansion costs. These adjustments reflect non-capitalized, one-time costs incurred related to the start-up of a new airlaid production facility in Fort Smith, Arkansas and implementation of a new business system.
Cost optimization actions. This adjustment reflects charges incurred in connection with initiatives to optimize the cost structure of certain business units in response to changes in business conditions. The costs are primarily related to headcount reduction efforts, asset write-offs and certain contract termination costs.
Specialty Papers environmental compliance. These adjustments reflect non-capitalized, one-time costs incurred by the business unit directly related to the compliance with the U.S. EPA Best Available Retrofit Technology rule and the Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology rule. This adjustment includes costs incurred during the transition period in which the newly installed equipment was brought on-line.
Timberland sales and related costs. These adjustments exclude gains from the sales of timberlands as these items are not considered to be part of our core business, ongoing results of operations or cash flows. These adjustments are irregular in timing and amount and may significantly impact our operating performance.
U.S. Tax Reform. These adjustments reflect amounts estimating the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The TCJA includes, among many provisions, a tax on the mandatory repatriation of earnings of the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries and a change in the corporate tax rate from 35 % to 21%.
Adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per share are considered measures not calculated in accordance with GAAP, and therefore are non-GAAP measures. The non-GAAP financial information should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following table sets forth the reconciliation of net income to adjusted earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:
Amount
EPS
Diluted EPS
Adjustments (pre-tax)
Costs related to strategic initiatives
4,281
Airlaid capacity expansion costs
4,705
4,453
Cost optimization actions
Specialty Papers' environmental compliance
2,480
Timberland sales and related costs
Total adjustments (pre-tax)
7,306
9,647
Income taxes (1)
(1,309
U.S. Tax Reform
(8
Total after-tax adjustments
8,648
0.19
Adjusted earnings
4,306
0.10
14,537
0.33
Tax effect on adjustments calculated based on the incremental effective tax rate of the jurisdiction in which each adjustment originated and the related impact of valuation allowances.
The sum of individual per share amounts set forth above may not agree to adjusted earnings per share due to rounding.
- 28 -
Business Unit Performance
- 29 -
Sales and Costs of Products Sold
Change
38,365
Energy and related
sales, net
262
38,627
53,482
(14,855
Gross profit as a percent
of Net sales
8.6
The following table sets forth the contribution to consolidated net sales by each business unit:
Percent of Total
Business Unit
34.8
33.2
Advanced Airlaid Material
17.4
47.8
100.0
Net sales totaled $816.4 million and $778.1 million in the first six months of 2018 and 2017, respectively. Higher selling prices and currency translation favorably impacted the year-over-year comparison by $7.8 million and $32.5 million, respectively. On a constant currency basis, Composite Fibers’ net sales and Advanced Airlaid Materials’ increased by 1.0% and 9.6%, respectively. Specialty Papers’ net sales declined 3.1% in the year-over-year comparison reflecting the shutdown of a machine in the third quarter of 2017.
Composite Fibers’ net sales increased $26.3 million, or 10.2% primarily due to a $24.5 million favorable impact from currency translation and $1.8 million from higher selling prices.
Composite Fibers’ operating income for the first six months of 2018 totaled $28.5 million, slightly lower than the year-ago period. A $1.8 million increase in selling prices and production efficiencies was offset by significantly higher raw material prices. The primary drivers are summarized in the following chart:
Advanced Airlaid Materials’ net sales increased $19.7 million, or 16.1%, primarily due to a 6.0% increase in
shipping volumes, $2.5 million from higher selling prices and $8.0 million from currency translation.
Operating income for the first six months of 2018 totaled $14.8 million, or 1.4% higher than the comparable period a year ago. Higher selling prices were substantially offset by higher input costs. The primary drivers are summarized in the following chart:
Specialty Papers’ net sales totaled $389.5 million, a $7.6 million decrease compared to the same period a year ago reflecting the shutdown of a machine in the third quarter of 2017, partially offset by $3.5 million from higher selling prices.
Specialty Papers’ operating loss totaled $18.5 million in the six months of 2018 compared with break-even in the same period a year ago. The weaker performance was driven by higher raw material and energy prices, particularly purchased pulp, outpacing the realization of increased selling prices on a net basis totaling $8.2 million. In addition, transition costs associated with the machine shutdown, severe weather and water quality issues, and an increase in the cost of annual maintenance outages from $29.0 million in 2018 compared with $22.9 million in 2017 adversely impacted results. The primary drivers are summarized in the following chart:
We sell excess power generated by the Spring Grove, PA facility. Renewable energy credits (“RECs”) represent sales of certified credits earned related to burning renewable sources
- 30 -
of energy such as black liquor and wood waste. We sell RECs into an illiquid market. The extent and value of future revenues from REC sales is dependent on many factors outside of management’s control. Therefore, we may not be able to generate consistent additional sales of RECs in future periods. The following table summarizes this activity for the first six months of 2018 and 2017:
Energy sales
2,121
1,793
328
Costs to produce
(1,521
(2,367
846
Net
600
(574
1,174
Renewable energy credits
1,772
2,684
(912
Other and Unallocated The amount of net operating expenses not allocated to a business unit and reported as “Other and Unallocated” in our table of Business Unit Performance totaled $20.8 million in the first six months of 2018 compared with $24.7 million in the first six months of 2017. The decrease in Other and Unallocated expenses, excluding the impact of gains from timberland sales in 2018, primarily relates to the costs in 2017 for the completion of Specialty Papers’ environmental compliance project.
Pension Expense The following table summarizes the amounts of pension expense recognized for the periods indicated:
Recorded as:
4,465
4,246
219
SG&A expense
1,141
1,124
Non operating expense
(1,872
(2,056
184
420
The amount of pension expense recognized each year is dependent on various actuarial assumptions and certain other factors, including discount rates and the fair value of our pension assets. Pension expense for the full year of 2018 is expected to be approximately $7.5 million compared with $6.6 million in 2017.
Gains (losses) on Dispositions of Plant, Equipment and Timberlands During the first six months of 2018, we completed the following sales of assets:
Income taxes For the first six months of 2018, we recorded an income tax benefit of $5.3 million on pre-tax loss of $6.9 million compared with a $5.7 million provision on pre-tax income of $11.6 million in the same period a year ago. The effective tax rate in the first six months of 2018 includes a $3.1 million investment tax credit as well the impact of the 2017 U.S. tax reform. This required us to record a provision for the Global Intangible Low Taxed Income, also known as GILTI, which increased the effective tax rate by approximately 10%. In addition, since we are using U.S. federal tax loss carryforwards there is no impact to cash taxes related to the GILTI provisions. The effective tax rate for the first six months of 2017 reflected an increase in unrecognized tax benefits and in our valuation allowances for U.S. deferred tax assets. The effective tax rate for the second half of 2018 is expected to be approximately 35%.
Foreign Currency We own and operate facilities in Canada, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the Philippines. The functional currency of our Canadian operations is the U.S. dollar. However, in Germany and France it is the Euro, in the UK, it is the British Pound Sterling, and in the Philippines the functional currency is the Peso. On an annual basis, our euro denominated revenue exceeds euro expenses by an estimated €145 million. For the first six months of 2018, the average currency exchange rate was 1.21 dollar/euro compared with 1.08 in the same period of 2017. With respect to the British Pound Sterling, Canadian dollar, and Philippine Peso, we have differing amounts of inflows and outflows of these currencies, although to a lesser degree than the euro. As a result, we are exposed to changes in currency exchange rates and such changes could be significant. The translation of the results from international operations into U.S. dollars is subject to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
- 31 -
The table below summarizes the translation impact on reported results that changes in currency exchange rates had on our non-U.S. based operations from the conversion of these operation’s results for the first six months of 2018.
Favorable
(unfavorable)
32,522
(28,665
SG&A expenses
(2,380
Income taxes and other
181
1,658
The above table only presents the financial reporting impact of foreign currency translations assuming currency exchange rates in 2018 were the same as 2017. It does not present the impact of certain competitive advantages or disadvantages of operating or competing in multi-currency markets.
Three months ended June 30, 2018 versus the three months ended June 30, 2017
Overview For the second quarter of 2018, our net loss totaled $7.4 million, or $0.17 per share compared with a net loss of $5.7 million, or $0.13 per share in the second quarter of 2017. On an adjusted basis the loss for the second quarter of 2018 was $4.3 million, or $0.10 per share compared with $2.6 million, or $0.06 per share, for the same period a year ago.
The following table sets forth summarized results of operations:
Operating loss
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of net income to adjusted earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:
2,172
1,672
2,495
Cost optimization
775
Specialty Papers' environmental compliance and other
216
3,279
3,412
(354
(317
172
3,097
0.07
3,095
Adjusted loss
(4,302
(0.10
(0.06
- 32 -
- 33 -
18,431
Energy and related sales,
net
(37
18,394
26,526
(8,132
5.3
35.2
34.4
17.9
16.2
46.9
49.4
Net sales totaled $405.8 million and $387.3 million in the second quarters of 2018 and 2017, respectively. Higher selling prices and favorable currency translation favorably impacted the comparison by $7.5 million and $10.7 million, respectively.
Composite Fibers’ net sales increased $9.8 million, or 7.4%, primarily due to $1.5 million from higher selling prices and $7.8 million of favorable currency translation, partially offset by lower shipping volumes.
Composite Fibers’ second quarter of 2018 operating income decreased to $13.2 million, a decrease of $1.5 million compared to the year ago quarter. Operating results were adversely impacted by $4.3 million of higher input costs, primarily due to significantly higher woodpulp prices, which were partially offset by efficient operations. Currency translation favorably impacted results by $0.4 million. The primary drivers are summarized in the following chart:
Advanced Airlaid Materials’ net sales increased $10.0 million in the quarter-over-quarter comparison. Shipping volumes increased 5.9% primarily due to continued growth of personal hygiene and wipes products and currency translation was favorable $3.0 million.
Advanced Airlaid Materials’ operating income totaled $7.6 million compared with $7.5 million in the second quarter of 2017. The second-quarter 2018 operating income was impacted by $0.9 million of depreciation expense related to the investment in the Fort Smith facility. The primary drivers are summarized in the following chart:
Specialty Papers’ net sales decreased $1.3 million, or 0.7%, as a $4.2 million increase in selling prices was more than offset by a 6.0% decline in shipping volumes related to a paper machine shutdown in the third quarter of 2017.
Specialty Papers’ operating loss totaled $20.9 million in the second quarter of 2018, compared with a loss of $13.5 million in the same period a year ago. Operating results reflect the cost of annual maintenance outages at the Chillicothe, OH and Spring Grove, PA facilities which adversely impacted
- 34 -
results by $29.0 million compared to $22.9 million in the second quarter 2017. In addition, this quarter’s results were adversely impacted by a $6.1 million increase in raw material and energy costs, particularly purchased pulp. The primary drivers are summarized in the following chart:
We sell excess power generated by the Spring Grove, PA facility. The following table summarizes this activity for the second quarters of 2018 and 2017:
662
787
(125
(555
(929
374
(142
837
1,123
(286
Other and Unallocated The amount of net operating expenses not allocated to a business unit and reported as “Other and Unallocated” in our table of Business Unit Performance totaled $9.4 million in the second quarter of 2018 compared with $10.5 million in the second quarter of 2017. The decrease in Other and Unallocated expenses excluding the impact of gains from timberland sales in 2018, primarily related to the completion in 2017 of cost optimization actions, the Specialty Papers environmental compliance projects and lower costs related to Advanced Airlaid Materials capacity expansion.
2,157
2,075
82
590
574
Non Operating Expense
(792
(658
(134
(36
Income taxes In the second quarter of 2018, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $8.0 million on a
pre-tax loss of $15.4 million including, a $3.1 million investment tax credit. In the second quarter of 2017 we recorded $0.4 million of income tax benefits on a pre-tax loss of $6.1 million reflecting the adverse impact of changes to our valuation allowances recorded against U.S. deferred tax assets.
Foreign Currency The table below summarizes the translation impact on reported results that changes in currency exchange rates had on our non-U.S. based operations from the conversion of these operation’s results for the second quarter of 2018.
Favorable (unfavorable)
10,703
(9,998
(872
174
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our business is capital intensive and requires significant expenditures for new or enhanced equipment, to support our research and development efforts, for environmental compliance matters and to support our business strategy. In addition, we have mandatory debt service requirements of both principal and interest. The following table summarizes cash flow information for each of the periods presented:
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
Cash provided (used) by
Effect of exchange rate
changes on cash
Net cash provided (used)
(9,031
end of period
107,188
At June 30, 2018, we had $107.2 million in cash and cash equivalents held by both domestic and foreign subsidiaries. Unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as of January 1, 2018 and forward are deemed to be indefinitely reinvested and therefore no U.S. tax liability is reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 35 -
Substantially all of our cash and cash equivalents is held by our foreign subsidiaries but could be repatriated without incurring a significant amount of additional taxes.
Cash provided by operating activities was essentially break even in the first six months of 2018 compared with $28.8 million in the same period a year ago largely due to an increase in working capital, primarily related to an increase in inventory, and lower operating profits.
Net cash used by investing activities decreased by $36.4 million in the year-over-year comparison due to lower capital expenditures primarily driven by the completion of the Specialty Papers environmental compliance project in 2017 and the airlaid capacity expansion. Capital expenditures are expected to total between $60 million and $62 million for 2018.
Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $28.8 million in the first six months of 2018 compared with $52.5 million in the same period of 2017. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities primarily reflects lower borrowings under our credit agreement in 2018 due to the completion of the major capital programs for the environmental compliance and capacity expansion.
The following table sets forth our outstanding long-term indebtedness:
Our revolving credit facility contains a number of customary compliance covenants, the most restrictive of which is a maximum leverage ratio of 3.5x. As of June 30, 2018, the leverage ratio, as calculated in accordance with the definition in our amended credit agreement, was 3.1x, within the limits set forth in our credit agreement. Based on our expectations of future results of operations and capital needs, we do not believe the debt covenants will impact our operations or limit our ability to undertake financings that may be necessary to meet our capital needs.
The 5.375% Notes contain cross default provisions that could result in all such notes becoming due and payable in the event of a failure to repay debt outstanding under the credit agreement at maturity, or a default under the credit agreement that accelerates the debt outstanding thereunder. As of June 30, 2018, we met all of the requirements of our debt
covenants. The significant terms of the debt instruments are more fully discussed in Item 1 - Financial Statements – Note 13.
Financing activities include cash used for common stock dividends. In the first six months of 2018, we used $11.4 million of cash for dividends on our common stock compared with $11.1 million in the same period of 2017. Our Board of Directors determines what, if any, dividends will be paid to our shareholders. Dividend payment decisions are based upon then-existing factors and conditions and, therefore, historical trends of dividend payments are not necessarily indicative of future payments.
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations intended to protect the environment as well as human health and safety. At various times, we have incurred significant costs to comply with these regulations and we could incur additional costs as new regulations are developed or regulatory priorities change.
As more fully discussed in Item 1 - Financial Statements – Note 16 – Commitments, Contingencies and Legal Proceedings (“Note 16”), we are involved in the Lower Fox River in Wisconsin (the “Fox River”), an EPA Superfund site for which we remain potentially liable for certain response costs and long-term monitoring and maintenance related matters. Based on the recent developments more fully discussed in Note 16, it is conceivable the resolution of this matter may require us to spend in excess of $26 million in 2018. Although we are unable to determine with any degree of certainty the amount we may be required to spend, the recent developments provide greater clarity to the extent of such amounts.
We expect to meet all of our near and long-term cash needs from a combination of operating cash flow, cash and cash equivalents, our existing credit facility and other long-term debt. However, as discussed in Note 16, an unfavorable outcome of the Fox River matters could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, liquidity and/or results of operations.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we had not entered into any off-balance-sheet arrangements. Financial derivative instruments, to which we are a party, and guarantees of indebtedness, which solely consist of obligations of subsidiaries, are reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets included herein in Item 1 – Financial Statements.
Outlook Composite Fibers’ shipping volumes in the third quarter of 2018 are expected to be approximately 8% higher than the second quarter. Selling prices as well as raw material and energy prices are expected to increase slightly.
Advanced Airlaid Materials’ shipping volumes in the third quarter of 2018 are expected to be in-line with the second quarter of 2018 and selling, raw material and energy prices are expected to increase slightly. For the full-year 2018, we
- 36 -
anticipate shipping volumes to be 6% to 8% higher than 2017 as the ramp up of new volumes has been delayed slightly by qualification processes. We anticipate taking downtime in the third quarter to align supply with demand, resulting in an adverse impact to operating income of approximately $1 million.
Specialty Papers’ shipping volumes in the third quarter are expected to be 8% higher than the second quarter of 2018. Average selling prices are expected to increase by
approximately $20 per ton and we expect raw material and energy prices to increase slightly.
Consolidated capital expenditures for the year are expected to be between $60 million and $62 million.
The effective tax rate on adjusted earnings is expected to be approximately 35% in the second half of 2018.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
Year Ended December 31
2019
2020
2021
2022
Carrying Value
Average principal outstanding
At fixed interest rates – Bond
197,917
At fixed interest rates – Term Loans
52,155
43,920
32,937
21,956
11,600
54,900
55,470
At variable interest rates
45,388
Weighted-average interest rate
On fixed rate debt – Bond
5.375
On fixed rate debt – Term Loans
1.89
1.87
1.85
1.82
1.77
On variable rate debt
3.56
The table above presents the average principal outstanding and related interest rates for the next five years for debt outstanding as of June 30, 2018. Fair values included herein have been determined based upon rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Our market risk exposure primarily results from changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. At June 30, 2018, we had $521.2 million of long-term debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs, of which 41.8% was at variable interest rates. Variable-rate debt outstanding represents borrowings under our revolving credit agreement that accrues interest based on LIBOR plus a margin. At June 30, 2018, the interest rate paid was approximately 3.56%. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in the interest rate on variable rate debt would increase or decrease annual interest expense by $2.2 million.
As part of our overall risk management practices, we enter into financial derivatives primarily designed to either i) hedge foreign currency risks associated with forecasted transactions – “cash flow hedges”; or ii) mitigate the impact that changes in currency exchange rates have on intercompany financing transactions and foreign currency denominated receivables and payables – “foreign currency hedges.” For a more complete discussion of this activity, refer to Item 1 – Financial Statements – Note 15.
We are subject to certain risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates to the extent our operations are conducted in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. On an annual basis, our euro denominated revenue exceeds euro expenses by an estimated €145 million. With respect to the British Pound Sterling, Canadian dollar, and Philippine Peso, we have differing amounts of inflows and outflows of these currencies, although to a lesser degree than the euro. As a result, particularly with respect to the euro, we are exposed to changes in currency exchange rates and such changes could be significant.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Our chief executive officer and our principal financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of June 30, 2018, have concluded that, as of the evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Controls There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2018, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
- 37 -
PART II
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference as indicated.
31.1
Certification of Dante C. Parrini, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith
31.2
Certification of John P. Jacunski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith
32.1
Certification of Dante C. Parrini, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, furnished herewith
32.2
Certification of John P. Jacunski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, furnished herewith
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document, filed herewith
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema, filed herewith
101.CAL
XBRL Extension Calculation Linkbase, filed herewith
101.DEF
XBRL Extension Definition Linkbase, filed herewith
101.LAB
XBRL Extension Label Linkbase, filed herewith
101.PRE
XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase, filed herewith
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY
(Registrant)
July 31, 2018
By
/s/ David C. Elder
David C. Elder
Vice President, Finance
- 38 -