Magnera
MAGN
#7118
Rank
$0.53 B
Marketcap
$14.96
Share price
0.00%
Change (1 day)
-23.63%
Change (1 year)

Magnera - 10-K annual report


Text size:
Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form 10-K
 
   
þ
 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
or
o
 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the transition period from          to
 
Commission file number 1-03560
P. H. Glatfelter Company
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
   
Pennsylvania
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 23-0628360
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
96 South George Street, Suite 500
York, Pennsylvania 17401
(Address of principal executive offices)
 (717) 225-4711
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
   
Title of Each Class
 
Name of Each Exchange on which registered
 
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share New York Stock Exchange
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o     No þ.
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ.
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o.
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-Tduring the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-Kis not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-Kor any amendment to thisForm 10-K.  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-acceleratedfiler o Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act)  Yes o     No þ.
 
Based on the closing price as of June 30, 2010, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock of the Registrant held by non-affiliates was $490.7 million.
 
Common Stock outstanding on March 11, 2011 totaled 45,999,846 shares.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 
Portions of the following documents are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report onForm 10-K:
 
Proxy Statement to be dated on or about March 30, 2011 (Part III).
 


 

 
P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY
ANNUAL REPORT ONFORM 10-K
For the Year Ended

DECEMBER 31, 2010
 
Table of Contents
 
           
    Page
 
        
       1 
       7 
       11 
       11 
       11 
        11 
       12 
 
PART II
        
       12 
       13 
       14 
       23 
       24 
       57 
       57 
       57 
 
PART III
        
       57 
       57 
       57 
       57 
       57 
 
PART IV
        
       58 
    
  60 
    
  61 
 EXHIBIT 10(P)
 EXHIBIT 21
 EXHIBIT 23
 EXHIBIT 31.1
 EXHIBIT 31.2
 EXHIBIT 32.1
 


Table of Contents

 
PART I
 
ITEM 1  BUSINESS
 
Overview  Glatfelter began operations in 1864 and we believe we are one of the world’s leading manufacturers of specialty papers and fiber-based engineered materials. Headquartered in York, Pennsylvania, we own and operate manufacturing facilities located in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, and the Philippines.
 
Acquisitions  Over the past several years we completed the following acquisitions:
 
              
     Est.
    
     Annual
 Business
 Primary
  Dollars in millions Date  Revenue(1) Unit Products
 
 
              
Location
             
              
Canada and Germany
  Feb ’10   $203.0  Advanced Airlaid
Materials
 Airlaid non-woven
for feminine
hygiene, adult
incontinence and other
              
Wales
  Nov ’07    53.4  Composite Fibers Metallized
              
Ohio
  Apr ’06    440.0  Specialty Papers Carbonless & forms
              
England
  Mar ’06    75.0  Composite Fibers Tea & coffee filter papers
 
 
 
(1)Represents annual revenue prior to acquisition.
 
These strategic acquisitions significantly increased our revenues and provided us with additional operating scale, increased production capacity, and an expansion of our geographic reach.
 
Products  Our three business units manufacture, both domestically and internationally, a wide array of specialty papers and fiber-based engineered materials including:
 
  • Specialty Papers with revenues earned from the sale of carbonless papers and forms, book publishing, envelope & converting, and engineered products;
 
  • Composite Fibers with revenue from the sale of food & beverage filtration papers, metallized papers, composite laminates used for decorative furniture and flooring applications, and technical specialties; and
 
  • Advanced Airlaid Materials with revenue from the sale of airlaid non-woven fabric-like materials used in feminine hygiene products, adult incontinence products, cleaning pads and wipes, food pads, napkins and tablecloths, and baby wipes.
 
Our Business Units  Since completing the acquisition of Concert Industries Corp. (“Concert”) on February 12, 2010, we now manage our company as three distinct business units: (i) Specialty Papers; (ii) Composite Fibers; and (iii) Advanced Airlaid Materials. Consolidated net sales and the relative net sales contribution of each of our business units for the past three years are summarized below:
 
                
  Dollars in thousands 2010  2009 2008  
 
                
Net sales
 $1,455,331   $1,184,010  $1,263,850   
                
Business unit contribution
               
                
Specialty Papers
  57.9%   66.9%  66.0%  
                
Composite Fibers
  28.8    33.1   34.0   
                
Advanced Airlaid Materials
  13.3          
                
                
Total
  100.0%   100.0%  100.0%  
                
 
Net tons sold by each business unit for the past three years were as follows:
 
                
  2010  2009 2008  
 
                
Specialty Papers
  764,670    738,841   743,755   
                
Composite Fibers
  90,350    80,064   85,599   
                
Advanced Airlaid Materials
  72,833          
                
                
Total
  927,853    818,905   829,354   
                
 
Specialty Papers  Our North America-based Specialty Papers business unit focuses on producing papers for the following markets:
 
  • Carbonless & forms papers for credit card receipts, multi-part forms, security papers and other end-user applications;
 
  • Book publishing papers for the production of high quality hardbound books and other book publishing needs;
 
  • Envelope and converting papers for the direct mail market, shopping bags, and other converting applications; and
 
  • Engineered products for digital imaging, transfer, casting, release, postal, playing card, FDA-compliant food and beverage applications, and other niche specialty applications.
 
The market segments in which Specialty Papers competes have undergone significant and rapid consolidation over the past several years resulting in fewer, more globally focused producers. This includes both commodity products (comprised of envelopes and certain forms) and higher-value-added specialty products.
 
Specialty Papers’ revenue composition by market consisted of the following for the years indicated:
 
                
  In thousands 2010  2009 2008  
 
                
Carbonless & forms
 $359,033   $320,088  $338,067   
                
Book publishing
  168,155    176,646   201,040   
                
Envelope & converting
  157,202    146,812   138,293   
                
Engineered products
  155,257    143,490   149,372   
                
Other
  2,967    4,879   7,127   
                
                
Total
 $842,614   $791,915  $833,899   
                
 
Many of the markets served by Specialty Papers are more mature and, in certain instances, declining. However, we have been successful in increasing this unit’s

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    1


Table of Contents

shipments through new product and new business development initiatives and leveraging the flexibility of our operating assets to efficiently respond to changing customer demands. During 2010, we invested approximately $10.4 million in product development activities and, in each of 2009 and 2008, we invested approximately $8.0 million. In each of the past three years, in excess of 50% of net sales were generated from products developed, enhanced or improved within the past five years.
 
We believe we are one of the leading suppliers of book publishing and carbonless papers in the United States. Although the markets for book publishing and carbonless papers in North America are declining, we have been successful in executing our strategy to replace this lost volume with products such as envelope and converting papers, forms and other products. Specialty Papers also produces paper that is converted into specialized envelopes in a wide array of colors, finishes and capabilities. This market is generally more mature and declining. However, we compete on our customer service capabilities and have grown our market share in each of the last three years.
 
Specialty Papers’ highly technical engineered products include those designed for multiple end uses, such as papers for pressure-sensitive postage stamps, greeting and playing cards, conical cups, digital imaging applications and for release paper applications. Such products comprise an array of distinct business niches that are in a continuous state of evolution. Many of these products are utilized by demanding, specialized customer and end-user applications. Some of our products are new and higher growth while others are more mature and further along in the product life cycle. Because many of these products are technically complex and involve substantial customer-supplier development collaboration, they typically command higher per ton prices and generally exhibit greater pricing stability relative to commodity grade paper products.
 
In the carbonless paper and forms market, we compete with Appleton Papers and, to a lesser extent, Nekoosa Papers, Inc. We believe we are one of the leading producers of book publishing papers and compete in these markets with, among others, Domtar and North Pacific Paper (NORPAC). In the envelope sector we compete with International Paper, Domtar and Evergreen, among others. In our Specialty Papers’ engineered products markets, competition is product line specific as the necessity for technical expertise and specialized manufacturing equipment limits the number of companies offering multiple product lines. We compete with specialty divisions of large companies such as, among others, International Paper, Domtar, Boise, NewPage and Sappi. Service, product performance, technological advances and product pricing are important competitive factors with respect to all our products. We believe our reputation in these areas continues to be excellent.
 
The Specialty Papers business unit operates two integrated pulp and paper making facilities with the following combined attributes:
 
               
Uncoated
   Estimated Annual
         Estimated
Capacity (short
 Principal Raw Material
 Quantity of PRM
 Percent of PRM
 Percent of Need Generated Principal
 Annual
tons) (“PRM”) (short tons) Purchased(1) Steam Electricity Source of Fuel Quantity
 
 
732,000
 Pulpwood 2,321,000 97% 100% 90% Coal 610,000 tons
  Wood- and other pulps   684,500 16      Natural gas 765,000 MCF
 
 
 
(1)Represents percent purchased from unrelated third-parties.
 
The Spring Grove, Pennsylvania facility includes five uncoated paper machines that have been rebuilt and modernized from time to time. It has an off-line combi-blade coater and a Specialty Coater (“S-Coater”), which together yield a potential annual production capacity for coated paper of approximately 68,000 tons. Since uncoated paper is used in producing coated paper, this is not additional capacity. We view the S-Coater as an important asset that allows us to expand our engineered paper products business. The Spring Grove facility also includes a pulpmill that has a production capacity of approximately 650 tons of bleached pulp per day.
 
The Chillicothe, Ohio facility operates four paper machines producing uncoated and carbonless paper. This facility also includes a pulpmill that has a production capacity of approximately 955 tons of bleached pulp per day.
 
The principal raw material used to produce each facility’s pulp is pulpwood, including both hardwoods and softwoods. Hardwoods are available within a relatively short distance of our mills. Softwoods are obtained from a variety of locations including the states of Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee and South Carolina. To protect our sources of pulpwood, we actively promote conservation and forest management among suppliers and woodland owners. In addition to sourcing the pulpwood in the open market, we have long-term supply contracts that provide access to timber at market prices.
 
The Spring Grove facility produces more electricity than it requires. Excess electricity was sold to the local

2


Table of Contents

power company under a long-term co-generation contract that expired on March 31, 2010. During 2010, in anticipation of the contract’s expiration, we became a member of PJM Interconnection, a federally regulated regional transmission organization that coordinates the movement and ensures reliability of wholesale electricity in its region. As a member, we are committed to providing capacity to the high-voltage electricity grid and agree to sell excess power at market prices. Accordingly, our margin earned from energy sales will be subject to market volatility associated with the price at which energy is sold together with volatility in input costs, primarily related to coal.
 
Cellulosic Biofuel Production Credits and Alternative Fuel Mixture Credits  The U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the “IRC”) provided tax credits for companies that produce cellulosic biofuel or use alternative fuel mixtures to produce energy to operate their businesses. The credits equal to $1.01 per gallon of cellulosic biofuel or $0.50 per gallon of alternative fuel contained in the mixture. In a memorandum issued in July 2010, the Internal Revenue Service issued guidance concluding that black liquor sold or used before January 1, 2010, qualifies for the cellulosic biofuel producer credit (“CBPC”) and no further certification of eligibility was needed.
 
In connection with filing our 2009 income tax return, we claimed $23.2 million, net of taxes, of CBPC for black liquor used during the period January 1, 2009 through February 19, 2009.
 
The alternative fuel mixture credit is refundable to the taxpayer. On May 11, 2009, we were notified by the Internal Revenue Service that our application to be registered as an alternative fuel mixer was approved. During 2009, we mixed and burned eligible alternative fuels for the period February 20, 2009 through December 31, 2009, and earned $107.8 million of alternative fuel mixture credits.
 
Composite Fibers  Our Composite Fibers business unit, based in Gernsbach, Germany, serves customers globally and focuses on higher-value-added products in the following markets:
 
  • Food & Beverage paper used for tea bags and single serve coffee products;
 
  • Metallized products used in the labeling of beer bottles, innerliners, gift wrap, self-adhesive labels and other consumer products applications;
 
  • Composite Laminates papers used in production of decorative laminates, furniture and flooring applications; and
 
  • Technical Specialties is a diverse line of paper products used in batteries, medical masks and other highly engineered applications.
 
We believe this business unit maintains a market leadership position in the growing tea bags and single-serve coffee products markets and the composite laminates market. Since the completion of the Caerphilly acquisition, we have the second largest market share for metallized products globally. Composite Fibers’ revenue composition by market consisted of the following for the years indicated:
 
                
  In thousands 2010  2009 2008  
 
                
Food & beverage
 $242,882   $233,899  $252,545   
                
Metallized
  88,753    81,388   85,719   
                
Composite laminates
  50,801    46,442   58,705   
                
Technical specialties and other
  36,781    30,366   32,983   
                
                
Total
 $419,217   $392,095  $429,952   
                
 
We believe many of the market segments served by Composite Fibers, particularly Food & Beverage and Metallized papers, present attractive growth opportunities by expanding into new geographic markets and by gaining market share through quality product and service offerings. Growth in these markets is driven by growing population and disposable income and changes in consumer preferences. Many of this unit’s papers are technically sophisticated. Most of the papers produced in the Composite Fibers business unit, except for metallized papers, are extremely lightweight and require very specialized fibers. Our engineering capabilities, specifically designed papermaking equipment and customer orientation position us well to compete in these global markets.
 
The Composite Fibers Business Unit is comprised of the three paper making facilities (Germany, France and the United Kingdom), metallizing operations (Wales and Germany) and a pulp mill (the Philippines) with the indicated combined attributes:
 
                           
      Estimated
          
Production
     Annual
   Percent of Need Principal
  
Capacity
   Principal Raw
 Quantity of
 Percent of
 Generated Source of
 Approximate
(short tons)   Material (“PRM”) PRM (short tons) PRM Purchased(1) Steam Electricity Fuel Quantity
 
 
65,900
 Lightweight Abaca pulp  15,500   20%  100%  15% Natural gas  1,654,000 MCF 
    Wood pulp  42,600   100               
    Synthetic fiber  10,600   100               
28,800
 Metallized Base stock  30,500   100        Natural gas  44,500 MCF 
12,500
 Abaca pulp Abaca fiber  19,100   100               
 
 
 
(1)Represents percent purchased from unrelated third-parties.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    3


Table of Contents

 
Our mill in the Philippines processes abaca fiber to produce a specialized pulp. This abaca pulp production process provides a unique advantage by supplying a key raw material in pulped form used by our Composite Fibers business unit. In the event the supply of abaca fiber becomes constrained or should production demands exceed capacity from the Philippines mill, alternative sourcesand/orsubstitute fibers are used to meet customer demands. In addition, events may arise from the relatively unstable political and economic environment in which the Philippine facility operates that could interrupt the production of abaca pulp. Management periodically evaluates the availability of abaca pulp for our Composite Fibers business unit. Any extended interruption of the Philippine operation could have a material impact on our consolidated financial positionand/orresults of operations. We target to have approximately one month of fiber supply in stock and one month of fiber supply at sea available to us. In addition, we have established contingency plans for alternative sources of abaca pulp. However, the cost of obtaining abaca pulp from such alternative sources, if available, would likely be much higher.
 
In Composite Fibers’ markets, competition is product line specific as the necessity for technical expertise and specialized manufacturing equipment limits the number of companies offering multiple product lines. We believe we have leading market positions for paper used in tea bags and single serve coffee products and compete with companies such as Ahlstrom and Purico. In composite laminates we compete with PdM, a division of Schweitzer-Maudit, Purico and MB Papeles and for metallized products, competitors include Vacumet, AR Metallizing, Amsterdam Metallized Products, and Protec.
 
Advanced Airlaid Materials  On February 12, 2010, we acquired Concert, which we now operate as the Advanced Airlaid Materials business unit. Founded in 1993, Concert is a leading global supplier of highly absorbent cellulose-based airlaid non-woven materials used to manufacture a diverse range of consumer and industrial products for growing global end-use markets. These products include:
 
  • feminine hygiene;
 
  • adult incontinence;
 
  • home care such as specialty wipes;
 
  • table top and towels; and
 
  • food pads and other.
 
This acquisition affords us the opportunity to grow with our customers who are industry leading consumer product companies for feminine hygiene and adult incontinence products. Advanced Airlaid Materials holds leading market share positions in the markets it serves, excels in building long-term customer relationships through superior quality and customer service programs, and has a well-earned reputation for innovation and its ability to quickly bring new products to market. Its customers are within close proximity to its facilities, and include multinational blue-chip consumer product companies.
 
Sales of feminine hygiene product material accounted for 81% of Advanced Airlaid Material’s revenue in 2010. These markets are considered to be more growth oriented in certain geographic regions driven by population growth, consumer preferences and suppliers’ ability to provide innovative products. In developing markets, demand is also influenced by increases in disposable income and cultural preferences.
 
The Advanced Airlaid Materials business unit operates two facilities with the following combined attributes:
 
         
    Estimated Annual
Production Capacity
 Principal Raw
 Quantity of PRM
(short tons) Material (short tons)
 
 
         
 102,300  Fluff pulp  68,200 
 
 
 
Advanced Airlaid Materials operatesstate-of-the-artfacilities in Gatineau, Quebec, Canada and Falkenhagen, Germany. The Gatineau location consists of two airlaid production lines employing multi-bonded and thermal airlaid techniques and asingle-lanefestooner. The Falkenhagen location operates three multi-bonded production lines and threesingle-lanefestooners.
 
Prior to our acquisition of Concert, approximately $80 million was invested by its previous owners to install a new line at the Falkenhagen facility. The new line, which successfully commenced commercial production during the fourth quarter of 2009, increased annual rated capacity by 19,400 tons, a 27% increase in the business unit’s capacity. A significant portion of this unit’s capacity is under contract through 2013.
 
Advanced Airlaid Materials is a technology and product innovation leader in technically demanding segments of the airlaid market, most notably feminine hygiene. We believe that its facilities are among the most modern and flexible airlaid facilities in the world, which allow it to produce at industry leading operating rates. Its proprietarysingle-lanerotary festooning technology, which was developed in 2002, provides customers with product packaged for efficient use. Advanced Airlaid Materials has leading market positions in feminine hygiene and adult incontinence products, food pads and specialty wipes. This business unit’s in-house technical product and process expertise, festooning capabilities and

4


Table of Contents

rigorous customer requirements create large barriers to entry for new entrants.
 
The airlaid industry is made up of a few large producers, including Buckeye Technologies Inc., Georgia-Pacific LLC, Duni AB, Fiberweb Plc., and us.
 
Additional financial information for each of our business units is included in Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 21.
 
Our Business Strategy  Our vision is to become the global supplier of choice in specialty papers and engineered products. We are continuously developing and refining our strategies to strengthen our business and position it for the future. Execution of our strategies is dependent on our customer relationships, technology, operational flexibility and our new product development efforts.
 
Our strategy includes maintaining and expanding market leading positions in global growth markets, focusing on specialization and innovation, in part, through new product development, driving efficiencies and cost reduction through ongoing continuous improvement initiatives and maintaining our focus on maximizing cash flow. With respect to each business unit, our strategy includes:
 
Specialty Papers  The North American uncoated free sheet market has been challenged by a supply and demand imbalance, particularly for commodity-like products. While the industry has narrowed the supply-demand gap by eliminating capacity, the imbalance continues. To be successful in the current market environment, our strategy is focused on:
 
  • leveraging our flexible operating platform to optimize product mix by shifting production among facilities to more closely match output with changing demand trends;
 
  • employing our new product and business development capabilities to meet changing customer demands and ensure optimal utilization of capacity;
 
  • utilizing ongoing continuous improvement methodologies to ensure operational efficiencies; and
 
  • maintaining superior customer service.
 
Composite Fibers  The markets served by this business unit are characterized by long-term growth opportunities. To take advantage of this, our strategy is focused on:
 
  • capturing world-wide growth in Composite Fibers’ core markets of food & beverage, composite laminates and metallized papers;
 
  • enhancing product mix across all of the business unit’s markets by utilizing new product development capabilities; and
 
  • implementing continuous improvement methodologies to increase productivity, reduce costs and expand capacity.
 
Advanced Airlaid Material  The markets served by this business unit are characterized by attractive growth opportunities. To take advantage of this, our strategy is focused on:
 
  • maintaining and expanding relationships with customers that are market-leading consumer product companies;
 
  • expanding geographic reach of markets served;
 
  • more fully utilizing and maximizing production capacity;
 
  • employing continuous improvement methodologies and initiatives to reduce costs and improve efficiencies; and
 
  • furthering our product innovation capabilities.
 
Balance Sheet  We are focused on prudent financial management and the maintenance of a conservative capital structure. By aggressively managing working capital to maximize cash flow from operations, making disciplined capital expenditure decisions and, as opportunities warrant, monetizing the value of our timberland assets, we are able to maintain a strong balance sheet, thereby preserving the flexibility to pursue strategic opportunities that will benefit our shareholders.
 
Acquisitions – We have a demonstrated ability to establish leading market positions through the successful acquisition and integration of complementary businesses. Since 2006, we have successfully completed and integrated four acquisitions. In February 2010, we further diversified our global footprint with the Concert acquisition, a technology and product innovation leader in technically demanding segments of the airlaid market, most notably feminine hygiene. We expect this acquisition will enable us to grow with our customers who are industry leading consumer products companies for feminine hygiene and adult incontinence products and complements our long-term strategy of driving growth in our markets in part through acquisitions.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    5


Table of Contents

 
Concentration of Customers  For each of the past three years, no single customer represented more than 10% of our consolidated net sales. However, as discussed in Item 1A Risk Factors, one customer accounted for the majority of Advanced Airlaid Materials net sales in 2010.
 
Capital Expenditures  Our business is capital intensive and requires extensive expenditures for new and enhanced equipment. These capital investments are necessary for environmental compliance, normal upgrades or replacements, business strategy and research and development. For 2011, we expect capital expenditures to total approximately $60 million to $65 million.
 
Environmental Matters  We are subject to laws and regulations which operate to protect the environment as well as human health and safety. We have, at various times, incurred significant costs to comply with those regulations, as new regulations are developed or regulatory priorities change. Currently, we anticipate that we could incur material capital and operating costs to comply with several air quality regulations including the U.S. EPA Best Available Retrofit Technology rule (BART; otherwise known as the Regional Haze Rule) and the Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology rule (Boiler MACT). Although we are in the process of analyzing the potential impact of these requirements, compliance could require significant capital expenditures. For a discussion of other environmental matters, see Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 20.
 
Employees  The following table summarizes our workforce as of December 31, 2010:
 
                       
        Contract Period  
Location Total Hourly(1) Salaried Start End Union
 
 
U.S.
                      
                       
                       
                       
Corporate/Spring Grove
  969   603   366   Jan. 2011   Jan. 2014  United Steelworkers International
                       
Chillicothe/Fremont
  1,399   1,051   348   Aug. 2009   Aug. 2012  Union and the Office and Professional
Employees International Union,
                       
International
                      
                       
Gernsbach, Germany
  602   364   238   Sept. 2010   Nov. 2012  Industriegewerkschaft
Bergbau, Chemie, Energie-IG BCE
                       
Scaër, France
  118   70   48   Nov. 2008   Nov. 2012  Confederation Generale des
Travailleurs & Force Ouvriere
                       
Lydney, England
  283   211   72   Feb. 2011   Feb. 2012  Unite the Union
                       
Caerphilly, Wales
  125   83   42   Jan. 2011   Jan. 2012  General Maintenance & Boiler’s
                       
Philippines
  92   63   29   Sept. 2007   Sept. 2012  Newtech Pulp Workers Union & Federation of Democratic Labor Org.
                       
Falkenhagen, Germany
  425   344   81   n/a   n/a  Works Council
                       
Gatineau, Canada
  324   240   84   Jan. 2010   Dec. 2013  La fraternité inter-provinciale des
ouvriers en électricités
                       
               Jul. 2010   Dec. 2011  Le syndicat canadien des communications, de l’énergie et du papier
             
             
                       
Total worldwide employees
  4,337   3,029   1,308           
 
 
 
(1)Generally, the majority of the hourly employees included in the table above are covered by terms and conditions of the collective bargaining agreements with the respective labor organization indicated.
 
We consider the overall relationship with our employees to be satisfactory.
 
Available Information  On our investor relations page of our Corporate website at www.glatfelter.com we make available free of charge our Annual Reports onForm 10-K,Quarterly Reports onForm 10-Qand Current Reports onForm 8-Kand other related information as soon as reasonably practical after they are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, our website includes a Corporate Governance page consisting of, among others, our Governance Principles and Code of Business Conduct, and biographies of our Board of Directors and Executive Officers, Audit, Compensation, Finance and Nominating Committees of the Board of Directors and their respective Charters, Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers of Glatfelter, our “whistle-blower” policy and other related material. We satisfy the disclosure requirement for any future amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Business Conduct or Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers by posting such information on our website. We will provide a copy of the Code of Business Conduct or Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers, without charge, to any person who requests one, by calling(717) 225-2724.

6


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A  RISK FACTORS
 
Our business and financial performance may be adversely affected by the adverse global economic environment or downturns in the target markets that we serve.
 
Demand for our products in the markets we serve is primarily driven by demand for our customers’ products, which is often affected by general economic conditions. Downturns in our target markets could result in decreased demand for our products. In particular, our businesses may be adversely affected in the event of weak global economic conditions and by softness in targeted markets. Our results could be adversely affected if economic conditions weaken or fail to continue to improve. Also, there may be periods during which demand for our products is insufficient to enable us to operate our production facilities in an economical manner. The economic impact may cause customer insolvencies which may result in their inability to satisfy their financial obligations to us. These conditions are beyond our ability to control and may have a significant impact on our sales and results of operations.
 
In addition to fluctuations in demand for our products in the markets we serve, the markets for our products are also significantly affected by changes in industry capacity and output levels. There have been periods of supply/demand imbalance in our industry which have caused wood pulp, fluff pulp and selling prices to be volatile. The timing and magnitude of price increases or decreases in these markets have generally varied by region and by product type. A sustained period of weak demand or excess supply would likely adversely affect pulp, fluff pulp and selling prices. This could have a material adverse affect on our operating and financial results.
 
The cost of raw materials and energy used to manufacture our products could increase and the availability of certain raw materials could become constrained.
 
We require access to sufficient and reasonably priced quantities of pulpwood, purchased pulps, pulp substitutes, abaca fiber and certain other raw materials. Our Spring Grove and Chillicothe locations are vertically integrated manufacturing facilities that generate approximately 85% of their annual pulp requirements.
 
Our Philippine mill purchases abaca fiber to produce abaca pulp, which we use to manufacture our paper for tea bags and single serve coffee products at our Gernsbach, Scaër and Lydney facilities. However, at certain times in the past, the supply of abaca fiber has been constrained due to factors such as weather related damage to the source crop as well as selection by land owners of alternative uses of land in lieu of fiber producing activities.
 
Our Advanced Airlaid Materials business unit requires access to sufficient quantities of fluff pulp, the supply of which is subject to availability of certain softwoods. Softwood availability can be limited by many factors, including, weather in regions where softwoods are abundant.
 
The cost of many of our production materials, including petroleum based chemicals, and freight charges, are influenced by the cost of oil. In addition, coal is a principal source of fuel for both the Spring Grove and Chillicothe facilities and natural gas is used as a source of fuel for our Chillicothe facility, and the Composite Fibers and Advanced Airlaid Materials business units’ facilities. In addition, our vendors’ liquidity may be impacted by the economy creating supply shortages.
 
Although we have contractual cost pass-through arrangements with certain customers we may not be able to fully pass increased raw materials or energy costs on to all customers if the market will not bear the higher price or where existing agreements with our customers limit price increases. If price adjustments significantly trail increases in raw materials or energy prices our operating results could be adversely affected.
 
Our industry is highly competitive and increased competition could reduce our sales and profitability.
 
In recent years, the global industries in which we compete have been adversely affected by capacity exceeding the demand for products and by declining uncoated free sheet demand. As a result, steps have been taken to reduce underperforming capacity. However. slowing demand or increased competition could force us to lower our prices or to offer additional services at a higher cost to us, which could reduce our gross margins and net income. The greater financial resources of certain of our competitors may enable them to commit larger amounts of capital in response to changing market conditions. Certain competitors may also have the ability to develop product or service innovations that could put us at a competitive disadvantage.
 
Some of the factors that may adversely affect our ability to compete in the markets in which we participate include:
 
  • the entry of new competitors into the markets we serve, including foreign producers;
 
  • the willingness of commodity-based producers to enter our markets when they are unable to

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    7


Table of Contents

 compete or when demand softens in their traditional markets;
 
  • the aggressiveness of our competitors’ pricing strategies, which could force us to decrease prices in order to maintain market share;
 
  • our failure to anticipate and respond to changing customer preferences;
 
  • the impact of emerging electronic-based substitutes for certain of our products such as book publishing and envelope;
 
  • the impact of replacement or disruptive technologies;
 
  • our inability to develop new, improved or enhanced products; and
 
  • our inability to maintain the cost efficiency of our facilities.
 
If we cannot effectively compete in the markets in which we operate, our sales and operating results would be adversely affected.
 
We may not be able to develop new products acceptable to our customers.
 
Our business strategy is market focused and includes investments in developing new products to meet the changing needs of our customers and to maintain our market share. Our success will depend in large part on our ability to develop and introduce new and enhanced products that keep pace with introductions by our competitors and changing customer preferences. If we fail to anticipate or respond adequately to these factors, we may lose opportunities for business with both current and potential customers. The success of our new product offerings will depend on several factors, including our ability to:
 
  • anticipate and properly identify our customers’ needs and industry trends;
 
  • price our products competitively;
 
  • develop and commercialize new products and applications in a timely manner;
 
  • differentiate our products from our competitors’ products; and
 
  • invest in research and development activities efficiently.
 
Our inability to develop new products could adversely impact our business and ultimately harm our profitability.
 
We are subject to substantial costs and potential liability for environmental matters.
 
We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations that govern our operations, including discharges into the environment, and the handling and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. We are also subject to laws and regulations that impose liability andclean-upresponsibility for releases of hazardous substances into the environment. To comply with environmental laws and regulations, we have incurred, and will continue to incur, substantial capital and operating expenditures. We anticipate that environmental regulation of our operations will continue to become more burdensome and that capital and operating expenditures necessary to comply with environmental regulations will continue, and perhaps increase, in the future. Because environmental regulations are not consistent worldwide, our ability to compete globally may be adversely affected by capital and operating expenditures required for environmental compliance. In addition, we may incur obligations to remove or mitigate any adverse effects on the environment, such as air and water quality, resulting from mills we operate or have operated. Potential obligations include compensation for the restoration of natural resources, personal injury and property damages.
 
Despite the December 2009 and March 2011 favorable rulings in the pending Fox River litigation, we continue to have exposure to liability for remediation and other costs related to the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls in the lower Fox River on which our former Neenah, Wisconsin mill was located. There can be no assurance that we will not be required to ultimately pay material amounts to resolve our liability in the Fox River matter. We have financial reserves for environmental matters, including the Fox River site, but we cannot be certain that those reserves will be adequate to provide for future obligations related to these matters, that our share of costsand/ordamages for these matters will not exceed our available resources, or that such obligations will not have a long-term, material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
 
Our environmental issues are complicated and should be reviewed in context; please see a more detailed discussion of these matters in Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 20.

8


Table of Contents

The Advanced Airlaid Materials business unit generates a substantial portion of its revenue from one customer serving the feminine hygiene products market, the loss of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
 
Advanced Airlaid Materials generates the majority of its net sales of feminine hygiene products in 2010 from one customer. The loss of a significant customer could have a material adverse effect on their operating results. In addition, sales in the feminine hygiene market accounted for approximately 81% of Advanced Airlaid Materials’ net sales in 2010. A decline in sales of feminine hygiene products or in sales of feminine hygiene products generally could have a material adverse effect on this unit’s operating results. Customers in the airlaid non-woven fabric material market, including the feminine hygiene market, may also switch to less expensive products or otherwise reduce demand for Advanced Airlaid Material’s products, thus reducing the size of the markets in which it currently sells its products. Any of the foregoing could result in our failing to realize the benefits of the acquisition, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance and business prospects.
 
Our operations may be impaired and we may be exposed to potential losses and liability as a result of natural disasters, acts of terrorism or sabotage or similar events.
 
Natural disasters, such as earthquakes, flooding or fire, and acts of terrorism or sabotage affecting our operating activities and major facilities could materially and adversely affect our operations, our operating results and financial condition. In particular, we own and operate four dams in York County, Pennsylvania that were built to ensure a steady supply of water for the operation of our paper mill in Spring Grove, Pennsylvania, which is a primary manufacturing location for our envelope papers and engineered products. Each of these dams is classified as “high hazard” by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania because they are located in close proximity to inhabited areas and sudden failure would endanger occupants or residential, commercial or industrial structures. Failure or breach of any of the dams, including as a result of natural disaster or act of terrorism or sabotage, could cause significant personal injuries and damage to residential and commercial property downstream for which we may be liable. The failure of a dam could also be extremely disruptive and result in damage to or the shutdown of our Spring Grove mill. Any losses or liabilities incurred due to the failure of one of our dams may not be fully covered by our insurance policies or may substantially exceed the limits of our policies, and could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
 
In addition, many of our paper making operations require a reliable and abundant supply of water. Such mills rely on a local water body or water source for their water needs and, therefore, are particularly impacted by drought conditions or other natural or manmade interruptions to its water supplies. At various times and for differing periods, each of our mills has had to modify operations due to water shortages or low flow conditions in its principal water supplies. Any interruption or curtailment of operations at any of our paper mills due to drought or low flow conditions at the principal water source or another cause could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
 
Our pulp mill in Lanao del Norte on the Island of Mindanao in the Republic of the Philippines is located along the Pacific Rim in the world’s hazard belt. By virtue of its geographic location, this mill is subject to, among other types of natural disasters, floods, droughts, cyclones, typhoons, earthquakes, windstorms and volcanic activity. Moreover, the area of Lanao del Norte has been a target of terrorist activities, including bombings, by suspected members of the al-Qaeda-linked Islamist groups in the Philippines, such as the Abu Sayyaf and the Rajah Solaiman Group and other Islamic militant groups, most notably the Moro Islamic Liberation Front. The most common bomb targets in Lanao del Norte to date have been power transmission towers. Our pulp mill in Mindanao is located in a rural portion of the island and is susceptible to attacks or power interruptions. The Mindanao mill supplies approximately 80% of the abaca pulp that is used by our Composite Fibers business unit to manufacture our paper for tea bags and single serve coffee products. Any interruption, loss or extended curtailment of operations at our Mindanao mill could materially and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
 
We have operations in a potentially politically and economically unstable location.
 
Our pulp mill in the Philippines is located in a region that is unstable and subject to political unrest. As discussed above, our Philippine pulp mill produces abaca pulp, a significant raw material used by our Composite Fibers business unit, and is currently our main provider of abaca pulp. There are limited suitable alternative sources of readily available abaca pulp in the world. In the event of a disruption in supply from our Philippine mill, there is no guarantee that we could obtain adequate amounts of abaca pulp from alternative sources at a reasonable price or at all. As a consequence, any civil disturbance, unrest, political instability or other event that causes a disruption

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    9


Table of Contents

in supply could limit the availability of abaca pulp and would increase our cost of obtaining abaca pulp. Such occurrences could adversely impact our sales volumes, revenues and operating results.
 
Our international operations pose certain risks that may adversely impact sales and earnings.
 
We have significant operations and assets located in Canada, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and the Philippines. Our international sales and operations are subject to a number of special risks, in addition to the risks in our domestic sales and operations, including differing protections of intellectual property, trade barriers, labor unrest, exchange controls, regional economic uncertainty, differing (and possibly more stringent) labor regulation, risk of governmental expropriation, domestic and foreign customs and tariffs, differing regulatory environments, difficulty in managing widespread operations and political instability. These factors may adversely affect our future profits. Also, in some foreign jurisdictions, we may be subject to laws limiting the right and ability of entities organized or operating therein to pay dividends or remit earnings to affiliated companies unless specified conditions are met. Any such limitations would restrict our flexibility in using funds generated in those jurisdictions.
 
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our results of operations.
 
We own and operate manufacturing facilities in Canada, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the Philippines. The majority of our business is transacted in U.S. dollars; however, a substantial portion of business is transacted in Euros, British Pound Sterling and Canadian dollars. With respect to the Euro, we generate substantially greater cash inflow in these currencies than we do outflow. However, with respect to the British Pound Sterling and the Philippine Peso, we have greater outflows than inflows of this currency. As a result of these positions, we are exposed to changes in currency exchange rates.
 
Our ability to maintain our products’ price competitiveness is reliant, in part, on the relative strength of the currency in which the product is denominated compared to the currency of the market into which it is sold and the functional currency of our competitors. Changes in the rate of exchange of foreign currencies in relation to the U.S. dollar, and other currencies, may adversely impact our results of operations and our ability to offer products in certain markets at acceptable prices.
 
Substantially lower and more volatilemarket-basedprices for sales of excess electricity compared to the fixed-price we historically received may prevent us from achieving the historical margins on our sales of excess electricity in relation to our coal supply contract, which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
 
Because our Spring Grove facility produces more electricity than it requires for its operations, we sell the excess energy produced. Historically, we sold the excess electricity to the local power company under a fixed-price long-term contract, which expired March 31, 2010. We now sell our excess electricity at wholesale market prices prevailing at the time of sale. Market prices for electricity have historically been volatile and may continue to be substantially lower than the price we historically received under the expired contract.
 
We generate electricity at our Spring Grove facility using a variety of fuels, including coal. We purchase coal for this facility under a long-term, fixed price supply contract, which expires at the end of 2012. Our cost of coal, as well as the costs incurred for natural gas and other fuels used to generate electricity, have a major impact on the net revenue and overall profitability of our Specialty Paper business unit. The combination of market-based pricing for energy sales and the fixed pricing of the coal contract may limit our ability to generate the level of net revenues from energy sales that we historically achieved and limit the overall profitability of our Specialty Papers business unit, which could have a material adverse affect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
 
An IRS audit of our 2009 tax return could result in a change in the tax treatment of the alternative fuel mixture credits we claimed in 2009, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.
 
The U.S. Internal Revenue Code, or the Code, provided a tax credit for companies that used alternative fuel mixtures to produce energy to operate their businesses on or prior to December 31, 2009. During 2009, we registered two of our facilities with the IRS as alternative fuel mixers based on their use of black liquor as an alternative fuel source. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we had substantial alternative fuel mixture credits relating to these facilities. Our results of operations in 2009 included, on a pre-tax basis, $107.8 million of alternative fuel mixture credits all of which has been used or realized in cash. In the event that the IRS audits

10


Table of Contents

our tax return for the year ended December 31, 2009, the IRS may conclude that some or all of the credits claimed are subject to federal income taxes, which would subject us to additional tax liabilities and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.
 
In the event any of the above risk factors impact our business in a material way or in combination during the same period, we may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to simultaneously fund our operations, finance capital expenditures, satisfy obligations and make dividend payments on our common stock.
 
In addition to debt service obligations, our business is capital intensive and requires significant expenditures for equipment maintenance, new or enhanced equipment, environmental compliance, and research and development to support our business strategies. We expect to meet all of our near and long-term cash needs from a combination of operating cash flow, cash and cash equivalents, our existing credit facility and other long-term debt. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from these sources, we could be unable to meet our near and long-term cash needs or make dividend payments.
 
ITEM 1B  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
 
None.
 
ITEM 2  PROPERTIES
 
We own substantially all of the land and buildings comprising our manufacturing facilities located in Pennsylvania; Ohio; Canada; the United Kingdom; Germany; France; and the Philippines. Substantially all of the equipment used in our manufacturing and related operations is also owned. Our metallized paper production facility located in Caerphilly, Wales leases the building and land associated with its operations. We also lease office space for a sales and distribution office in Moscow, Russia, as well as our corporate offices located in York, Pennsylvania. All of our properties, other than those that are leased, are free from any material liens or encumbrances. We consider all of our buildings to be in good structural condition and well maintained and our properties to be suitable and adequate for present operations.
 
ITEM 3  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
We are involved in various lawsuits that we consider to be ordinary and incidental to our business. The ultimate outcome of these lawsuits cannot be predicted with certainty; however, we do not expect such lawsuits, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
 
For a discussion of commitments, legal proceedings and related contingencies, see Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 20.
 
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
 
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our executive officers as of March 11, 2011.
 
         
Name Age Office with the Company  
 
 
Dante C. Parrini
  46  President and Chief Executive Officer  
         
John P. Jacunski
  45  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
         
Jonathan A. Bourget
  46  Vice President & General Manager, Advanced Airlaid Materials Business Unit  
         
David C. Elder
  42  Vice President and Corporate Controller  
         
Thomas G. Jackson
  45  Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary  
         
Debabrata Mukherjee
  41  Vice President & General Manager, Specialty Papers Business Unit  
         
Martin Rapp
  51  Vice President & General Manager, Composite Fibers Business Unit  
         
Mark A. Sullivan
  56  Vice President Global Supply Chain  
         
William T. Yanavitch II
  50  Vice President Human Resources and Administration  
 
 
 
Officers are elected to serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. Except in the case of officers elected to fill a new position or a vacancy occurring at some other date, officers are generally elected at the organizational meeting of the Board of Directors held immediately after the annual meeting of shareholders.
 
Dante C. Parrini became President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2011. Prior to this appointment, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, a position he held since February 2005. Mr. Parrini joined us in 1997 and has previously served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, a position he held beginning in January 2003 and prior to that as Vice President responsible for Sales and Marketing.
 
John P. Jacunski became Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in July 2006. From October 2003 until July 2006, he was Vice President and Corporate Controller. Mr. Jacunski was previously Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at WCI Steel, Inc. from June 1999 to October 2003. Prior to joining WCI, Mr. Jacunski was with KPMG, an international accounting and consulting firm, where he served in various capacities.
 
Jonathan A. Bourget joined us in July 2010 as Vice President & General Manager, Advanced Airlaid Materials Business Unit. From 2008 until joining our Company, Mr. Bourget was Vice President & General Manager of European operations at Polymer Group Inc. Prior to this, he held various positions of increasing

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    11


Table of Contents

responsibility, including General Manager Specialties Division in Europe, with Alcoa Inc.
 
David C. Elder was appointed Vice President in March 2009 and has served as Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer since July 2006. Prior to joining us in January 2006, Mr. Elder was Corporate Controller for YORK International Corporation, a position he held since December 2003. Prior thereto, he was the Director, Financial Planning and Analysis for YORK International Corporation from August 2000 to December 2003.
 
Thomas G. Jackson became Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in June 2008. Since joining us in November 2006, Mr. Jackson has held various positions in our legal department including Assistant General Counsel, Assistant Secretary and Director of Compliance. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Jackson was Director of Business Development at C&D Technologies, Inc. from August 2005 to September 2006 and prior to that was Deputy General Counsel at C&D Technologies from October 1999 to August 2005.
 
Debabrata Mukherjee was appointed Vice President & General Manager, Specialty Papers Business Unit in April 2008. Dr. Mukherjee joined our Company in 1998 and since then has held various operational, sales and technical leadership positions within the Specialty Papers Business Unit. From March 2006 through March 2008, Dr. Mukherjee served as Division Vice President, Engineered & Converting Products. From February 2004 through February 2006, Dr. Mukherjee served as Director, Engineered Products. Prior to joining Glatfelter, Dr. Mukherjee served in various capacities with Felix Schoeller, a German based global specialty paper manufacturer.
 
Martin Rapp joined Glatfelter in August 2006 and serves as Vice President and General Manager – Composite Fibers Business Unit. Prior to this, Mr. Rapp was Vice President and General Manager of Avery Dennison’s Roll Materials Business in Central and Eastern Europe since August 2002.
 
Mark A. Sullivan was appointed Vice President, Global Supply Chain in February 2005. Mr. Sullivan joined our company in December 2003 as Chief Procurement Officer. His experience includes a broad array of operations and supply chain management responsibilities during 20 years with the DuPont Company.
 
William T. Yanavitch II rejoined the Company in May 2005 as Vice President Human Resources and Administration. Mr. Yanavitch served as Vice President Human Resources from July 2000 until his resignation in January 2005 at which time he became Corporate Human Resources Manager of Constellation Energy.
 
ITEM 4  [RESERVED]
 
PART II
 
ITEM 5  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
 
Common Stock Prices and Dividends Declared Information
 
The following table shows the high and low prices of our common stock traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “GLT” and the dividend declared per share for each quarter during the past two years.
 
               
  Quarter High Low Dividend  
 
               
2010
              
               
Fourth
 $13.37  $11.62  $0.09   
               
Third
  12.65   10.08   0.09   
               
Second
  15.49   10.62   0.09   
               
First
  15.05   12.32   0.09   
               
               
2009
              
               
Fourth
 $12.58  $10.01  $0.09   
               
Third
  12.14   7.91   0.09   
               
Second
  11.59   6.00   0.09   
               
First
  9.80   4.57   0.09   
               
 
As of March 11, 2011, we had 1,448 shareholders of record.

12


Table of Contents

STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
 
The following graph compares the cumulative5-year total return of our common stock with the cumulative total returns of both a peer group and a broad market index. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we compare our stock performance to the S&P Small Cap 600 Paper Products index. This index is comprised of Buckeye Technologies Inc., Clearwater Paper Corp., Kapstone Paper & Packaging Corp., Neenah Paper Inc., Schweitzer-Mauduit International and Wausau Paper Corp. In addition, the chart includes a comparison to the Russell 2000, which we believe is an appropriate benchmark index for stocks such as ours.
 
The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock, in each index, and the peer group (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 on December 31, 2005 and charts it through December 31, 2010.
 
(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)
 
 
ITEM 6  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
                         
  As of or for the Year Ended December 31
              
  Dollars in thousands, except per share  2010(1)  2009(3) 2008 2007 2006  
 
Net sales
  $1,455,331   $1,184,010  $1,263,850  $1,148,323  $986,411   
Energy and related sales, net
   10,653    13,332   9,364   9,445   10,726   
                         
Total revenue
   1,465,984    1,197,342   1,273,214   1,157,768   997,137   
Reversal of (charges for) shutdown and restructuring
          856   (35)  (30,318)  
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
   453    898   18,468   78,685   17,394   
Net income (loss)
  $54,434(2)  $123,442  $57,888  $63,472  $(12,236)  
Earnings (loss) per share
                        
Basic
  $1.19   $2.70  $1.28  $1.41  $(0.27)  
Diluted
   1.17    2.70   1.27   1.40   (0.27)  
Total assets
  $1,341,747   $1,190,294  $1,057,309  $1,287,067  $1,225,643   
Total debt
   333,022    254,583   313,285   313,185   397,613   
Shareholders’ equity
   552,442    510,704   342,707   476,068   388,368   
Cash dividends declared per common share
   0.36    0.36   0.36   0.36   0.36   
Capital expenditures
   36,491    26,257   52,469   28,960   44,460   
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
   65,839    61,256   60,611   56,001   50,021   
                         
                         
Shares outstanding
   45,976    45,706   45,434   45,141   44,821   
Net tons sold
   927,853    818,905   829,354   799,512   721,892   
Number of employees
   4,337    3,546   3,633   3,854   3,704   
                         
 
(1)The information set forth above for 2010 includes the financial information for Concert Industries Corp. prospectively from the February 12, 2010 acquisition date.
 
(2)During 2010, net income included a $23.2 million tax benefit from cellulosic biofuel production credits.
 
(3)During 2009, we recognized $107.8 million of alternative fuel mixture credits, all of which were recorded as a reduction to cost of products sold.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    13


Table of Contents

 
ITEM 7  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Forward-Looking Statements  This Annual Report onForm 10-Kincludes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding industry prospects and future consolidated financial position or results of operations, made in this Report onForm 10-Kare forward looking. We use words such as “anticipates”, “believes”, “expects”, “future”, “intends” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Our actual results may differ significantly from such expectations. The following discussion includes forward-looking statements regarding expectations of, among others, non-cash pension expense, environmental costs, capital expenditures and liquidity, all of which are inherently difficult to predict. Although we make such statements based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. Accordingly, we identify the following important factors, among others, which could cause our results to differ from any results that might be projected, forecasted or estimated in any such forward-looking statements:
 
i.     variations in demand for our products including the impact of any unplanned market-related downtime, or variations in product pricing;
 
ii.     changes in the cost or availability of raw materials we use, in particular pulpwood, market pulp, pulp substitutes, caustic soda and abaca fiber;
 
iii.     changes in energy-related costs and commodity raw materials with an energy component;
 
iv.     our ability to develop new, high value-added products;
 
v.     the impact of exposure to volatile market-based pricing for sales of excess electricity;
 
vi.     the impact of competition, changes in industry production capacity, including the construction of new mills, the closing of mills and incremental changes due to capital expenditures or productivity increases;
 
vii.     the gain or loss of significant customersand/oron-going viability of such customers;
 
viii.     cost and other effects of environmental compliance, cleanup, damages, remediation or restoration, or personal injury or property damages related thereto, such as the costs of natural resource restoration or damages related to the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) in the lower Fox River on which our former Neenah mill was located;
 
ix.     risks associated with our international operations, including local economic and political environments and fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
 
x.     geopolitical events, including war and terrorism;
 
xi.     disruptions in productionand/orincreased costs due to labor disputes;
 
xii.     the impact of unfavorable outcomes of audits by various state, federal or international tax authorities;
 
xiii.     enactment of adverse state, federal or foreign tax or other legislation or changes in government policy or regulation;
 
xiv.     adverse results in litigation; and
 
xv.     our ability to finance, consummate and integrate acquisitions.
 
Introduction  We manufacture, both domestically and internationally, a wide array of specialty papers and fiber-based engineered materials. We manage our company along three business units:
 
  • Specialty Papers with revenues earned from the sale of carbonless papers and forms, book publishing, envelope & converting, and engineered products;
 
  • Composite Fibers with revenue from the sale of food & beverage filtration papers, metallized papers, composite laminates used for decorative furniture and flooring applications, and technical specialties; and
 
  • Advanced Airlaid Materials with revenue from the sale of airlaid non-woven fabric like materials used in feminine hygiene products, adult incontinence products, cleaning pads and wipes, food pads, napkins and tablecloths, and baby wipes.
 
Overview  On February 12, 2010, we completed the acquisition of Concert Industries Corp. (“Concert”), a manufacturer of highly absorbent cellulose-based airlaid non-woven materials with annual revenue in 2009 of $203 million. Our results of operations for 2010 include the results of Concert (now operated as the Advanced Airlaid Materials business unit) prospectively since the acquisition was completed.

14


Table of Contents

Our reported results of operations for 2010 when compared to 2009 are lower primarily due to the higher amount of tax-related credits recorded in 2009 than in 2010 associated with cellulosic or alternative fuel mixtures. For 2010, net income included a $23.2 million tax benefit from cellulosic biofuel credits compared to $95.8 million, after-tax, alternative fuel mixture credits during 2009.
 
Our 2010 results include $9.1 million, after-tax, of acquisition and integration costs, together with a $1.7 million loss on forward foreign currency contracts that hedged the Canadian dollar purchase price, of the Concert acquisition. Interest expense increased $6.2 million in 2010 compared to 2009 due to financing part of the acquisition price.
 
Operationally, our results were favorably affected by higher volumes shipped associated with improving demand in many of the markets served by our businesses and the inclusion of Concert. Higher average selling prices offset the adverse affect of rising input costs, particularly purchased pulp.
 
Specialty Papers’ operating income totaled $58.4 million and $55.9 million for 2010 and 2009, respectively. The improvement in operating income was led by higher volumes shipped, higher average selling prices, productivity improvements and cost reduction initiatives partially offset by lower sales of excess energy and renewable energy credits. During 2009, the weak economic environment adversely affected demand in all markets served by Specialty Papers. As a result of weak demand in the first half of the year and our efforts to reduce inventory, this unit incurred market related downtime totaling 33,019 tons of paper.
 
Our Composite Fibers business unit’s operating income increased to $32.9 million from $21.9 million in 2009. Volumes shipped during 2010 increased 12.8% compared to 2009 as a result of the improving economic environment. Conversely, during 2009, as a result of weak demand and our inventory reduction efforts, we incurred unscheduled downtime totaling approximately 6,480 tons of paper, or 9.4% of the unit’s total capacity for the period.
 
Advanced Airlaid Materials earned $4.4 million of operating income on sales of $193.5 million for the ten and one half months of operations since the date of acquisition. The results were adversely impacted primarily by rapidly rising input costs, a lag in the timing of cost-pass throughs and currency fluctuations.
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
2010 versus 2009
 
The following table sets forth summarized consolidated results of operations:
 
             
   Year Ended December 31  
  In thousands, except per share  2010  2009  
 
             
Net sales
  $1,455,331   $1,184,010   
             
Gross profit
   186,247    269,764   
             
Operating income
   64,589    160,405   
             
Net income
   54,434    123,442   
             
Earnings per diluted share
   1.17    2.70   
             
 
The consolidated results of operations for 2010 and 2009 include the following items not considered to be part of our core business operations:
 
           
  After-tax
    
  In thousands, except per share Income (loss) Diluted EPS  
 
           
2010
          
           
Cellulosic biofuel credit
 $23,184  $0.50   
           
Acquisition and integration costs
  (9,073)  (0.20)  
           
Foreign currency hedge on acquisition price
  (1,673)  (0.04)  
           
Timberland sales and related transaction costs
  1,063   0.02   
           
2009
          
           
Alternative fuel mixture credits
 $95,764  $2.09   
           
Acquisition related costs
  (1,768)  (0.04)  
           
 
These items increased earnings by $13.5 million, or $0.28 per diluted share in 2010. Comparatively, the items identified above increased earnings in 2009 by $94.0 million, or $2.05 per diluted share.
 
Business Units  Results of individual business units are presented based on our management accounting practices and management structure. There is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for management accounting equivalent to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; therefore, the financial results of individual business units are not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other company. The management accounting process uses assumptions and allocations to measure performance of the business units. Methodologies are refined from time to time as management accounting practices are enhanced and businesses change. The costs incurred by support areas not directly aligned with the business unit are allocated primarily based on an estimated utilization of support area services or are included in “Other and Unallocated” in the Business Unit Performance table.
 
Management evaluates results of operations of the business units before pension income or expense, alternative fuel mixture credits, charges related to the Fox River environmental reserves, restructuring related charges, unusual items, certain corporate level costs, and the effects of asset dispositions. Management believes that

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    15


Table of Contents

this is a more meaningful representation of the operating performance of its core papermaking businesses, the profitability of business units and the extent of cash flow generated from these core operations. Such amounts are presented under the caption “Other and Unallocated.” This presentation is aligned with the management and operating structure of our company. It is also on this basis that the Company’s performance is evaluated internally and by the Company’s Board of Directors.
                                               
  Business Unit Performance
  Year Ended December 31
  Dollars in millions  Specialty Papers Composite Fibers Advanced Airlaid Materials Other and Unallocated Total
   2010  2009 2010  2009 2010  2009 2010  2009 2010  2009
Net sales
  $842.6   $791.9  $419.2   $392.1  $193.5   $  $   $  $1,455.3   $1,184.0 
Energy and related sales, net
   10.7    13.3                        10.7    13.3 
                                               
Total revenue
   853.3    805.2   419.2    392.1   193.5              1,466.0    1,197.3 
Cost of products sold
   740.2    693.9   350.5    334.4   181.7       7.4    (100.7)  1,279.7    927.6 
                                               
Gross profit
   113.1    111.3   68.7    57.7   11.8       (7.4)   100.7   186.2    269.8 
SG&A
   54.7    55.4   35.8    35.8   7.4       24.3    19.1   122.1    110.3 
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
                        (0.5)   (0.9)  (0.5)   (0.9)
                                               
Total operating income (loss)
   58.4    55.9   32.9    21.9   4.4       (31.2)   82.6   64.6    160.4 
Nonoperating income (expense)
                        (31.1)   (17.3)  (31.1)   (17.3)
                                               
Income (loss) before income taxes
  $58.4   $55.9  $32.9   $21.9  $4.4   $  $(62.3)  $65.3  $33.5   $143.1 
                                               
Supplementary Data
                                              
Net tons sold (in thousands)
   764.7    738.8   90.4    80.1   72.8              927.9    818.9 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
  $34.9   $37.5  $23.7   $23.7  $7.2   $  $   $  $65.8   $61.3 
Capital expenditures
   24.1    14.2   8.2    12.1   4.2              36.5    26.3 
                                               
 
The sum of individual amounts set forth above may not agree to the consolidated financial statements included herein due to rounding.
 
Sales and Costs of Products Sold
 
                 
   Year Ended December 31    
  In thousands  2010  2009 Change  
 
Net sales
  $1,455,331   $1,184,010  $271,321   
Energy and related sales – net
   10,653    13,332   (2,679)  
                 
Total revenues
   1,465,984    1,197,342   268,642   
Costs of products sold(1)
   1,279,737    927,578   352,159   
                 
Gross profit
  $186,247   $269,764  $(83,517)  
                 
Gross profit as a percent of Net sales
   12.8%   22.8%      
                 
 
(1)2009 includes $107.8 million of alternative fuel mixture credits, net of related expenses.
 
The following table sets forth the contribution to consolidated net sales by each business unit:
 
             
   Percent of total  
   2010  2009  
 
Business Unit
            
Specialty Papers
   57.9%   66.9%  
Composite Fibers
   28.8    33.1   
Advanced Airlaid Materials
   13.3       
             
Total
   100.0%   100.0%  
             
 
Net sales  Net sales for 2010 were $1,445.3 million, a 22.9% increase compared with $1,184.0 million for 2009, reflecting stronger business activity in the our Specialty Papers and Composite Fibers business units and the inclusion of Concert, now operated and reported as Advanced Airlaid Materials business unit, prospectively since the February 12, 2010 acquisition date.
 
In the Specialty Papers business unit, net sales for 2010 increased $50.7 million, or 6.4%, to $842.6 million. The increase was primarily due to higher volumes shipped and a $24.0 million benefit from higher selling prices.
 
Specialty Papers’ operating profit for 2010 improved by $2.5 million compared with 2009 primarily due to higher selling prices, a 3.5% increase in volumes shipped and the lack of market-related downtime. These favorable factors were partially offset by higher input costs, primarily pulp. In addition, higher maintenance costs largely associated with the annual mill outages and with unplanned production interruptions adversely impacted the year over year comparison.
 
We sell excess power generated by the Spring Grove, PA facility. In addition, two of our facilities are registered generators of renewable energy credits (“RECs”). The following table summarizes this activity for 2010 and 2009:
 
                 
  In thousands  2010  2009 Change  
 
Energy sales
  $14,296   $20,128  $(5,832)  
Costs to produce
   (10,403)   (11,883)  1,480   
                 
Net
   3,893    8,245   (4,352)  
Renewable energy credits
   6,760    5,087   1,673   
                 
Total
  $10,653   $13,332  $(2,679)  
                 
 
RECs represent sales of certified credits earned related to burning renewable sources of energy such as black liquor and wood waste. We sell RECs into an emerging and somewhat illiquid market. The extent and value of future revenues from REC sales is dependent on many factors outside of management’s control. Therefore, we may not be able to generate consistent amounts of sales of RECs in future periods.

16


Table of Contents

In Composite Fibers, net sales for 2010 were $419.2 million, an increase of $27.1 million, or 6.9%, from 2009. The improvement reflects strengthening demand in each of its product lines as volumes shipped increased 12.9%. On a constant currency basis, average selling prices were lower by $1.0 million, and the translation of foreign currencies unfavorably affected net sales by approximately $15.0 million.
 
Composite Fibers’ operating profit increased $11.0 million, or 50.2%, in the year over year comparison. The improved performance was driven by the $10.8 million combined benefit from improved demand in markets served resulting in higher shipments and the elimination of market driven downtime. In addition, the production efficiencies from continuous improvement initiatives more than offset the adverse effect of foreign currency translation adjustments.
 
Results for Advanced Airlaid Materials are included from February 12, 2010, the date of the Concert acquisition. This business unit’s results were unfavorably affected by rising input costs that outpaced the timing of increases in selling prices. In addition, results were adversely impacted by operating inefficiencies and by $1.4 million as a result of charging cost of products sold for thewrite-up of acquired inventory to fair value.
 
Alternative Fuel Mixture Credits  The U.S. Internal Revenue Code provided a tax credit for companies that use alternative fuel mixtures to produce energy to operate their businesses. The credit, equal to $0.50 per gallon of alternative fuel contained in the mixture, is refundable to the taxpayer. On May 11, 2009, we were notified by the Internal Revenue Service that our application to be registered as an alternative fuel mixer was approved. During 2009, we mixed and burned eligible alternative fuels, and earned $107.8 million of alternative fuel mixture credits. We record all alternative fuel mixture credits as a reduction to cost of goods sold.
 
According to the Internal Revenue Code, the tax credit expired on December 31, 2009.
 
Pension Expense  The following table summarizes the amounts of pension expense recognized for 2010 compared to 2009:
 
                 
   Year Ended December 31    
  In thousands  2010  2009 Change  
Recorded as:
                
                 
Costs of products sold
  $7,056   $4,936  $2,120   
                 
SG&A expense
   2,185    2,097   88   
                 
                 
Total
  $9,241   $7,033  $2,208   
                 
 
The amount of pension expense recognized each year is determined using various actuarial assumptions and certain other factors, including discount rates and the fair value of our pension assets as of the beginning of the year. The primary reason for the increase in pension expense in the comparison is due to decreases in discount rates used.
 
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”)  SG&A expenses increased $11.9 million in theyear-to-yearcomparison and totaled $122.1 million for 2010. The increase was substantially all related to legal and professional fees related to the Concert acquisition, costs to integrate the acquired entities and the inclusion of its operations prospectively from the date of acquisition.
 
Gain on Sales of Plant, Equipment and Timberlands, net  During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we completed the following sales of assets:
 
                 
  Dollars in thousands  Acres  Proceeds Gain  
2010
                
                 
Timberlands
   164   $387  $373   
                 
Other
   n/a    177   80   
                 
                 
Total
       $564  $453   
                 
                 
2009
                
                 
Timberlands
   319   $951  $906   
                 
Other
   n/a       (8)  
                 
                 
Total
       $951  $898   
                 
 
In connection with each of the asset sales set forth above, we received cash proceeds.
 
Other nonoperating income (expense)  For the year ended December 31, 2010, other non operating expense, net totaled $6.3 million. In connection with the Concert acquisition, we entered into a series of forward foreign currency contracts to hedge the acquisition’s Canadian dollar purchase price. All contracts were settled for cash during the first quarter of 2010 and resulted in a $3.4 million loss, net of realized currency translation gains, which is presented under the caption“Other-net”in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. In addition, in connection with purchase accounting for the Concert transaction, we recorded a $2.5 million reserve for tax risks, inclusive of accrued interest, existing at the time of the acquisition and at the same time recorded a $2.5 million receivable from the seller due to an indemnification agreement. During the fourth quarter, a tax ruling was issued that eliminated this tax risk and as a result we recognized an expense of $2.5 million which is presented under the caption“Other-net”in the accompanying consolidated statements of income to eliminate the receivable from the seller. We also recognized a $2.5 million tax benefit for this same item to eliminate the tax reserve previously established resulting in no net impact to earnings during 2010.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    17


Table of Contents

Income taxes  For 2010, we recorded income tax benefits of $20.9 million on $33.5 million of pretax income. The comparable amounts in the same period of 2009 were income tax expense of $19.7 million on $143.1 million of pretax income. The benefit in 2010 was due to $23.2 million of cellulosic biofuel credits, net, recorded as an income tax benefit in 2010 as discussed further below. We also recorded the $2.5 million tax benefit discussed in the previous paragraph, as well as a $6.4 million adjustment to reduce tax liabilities resulting from the expiration of statutes on uncertain tax positions and other factors. The tax provision in 2009 included a $27.1 million benefit from nontaxable alternative fuel mixture credit.
 
Cellulosic Biofuel Production Credit  In March 2010, our application to be registered as a cellulosic biofuel producer was approved by the Internal Revenue Service. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code provides for a non refundable tax credit equal to $1.01 per gallon for taxpayers that produce cellulosic biofuel. On July 9, 2010, the IRS Office of Chief Counsel issued a memorandum which concluded that black liquor sold or used in a taxpayer’s trade or business during calendar year 2009, qualifies for the cellulosic biofuel producer credit (“CBPC”). Accordingly, each gallon of black liquor we produced during calendar year 2009 qualifies for a non-refundable CBPC of $1.01 per gallon.
 
In connection with the filing of our 2009 income tax return, we claimed $23.2 million, net of taxes, of CBPC. Subsequent to the end of 2010, we received a cash tax refund of $17.8 million, of which $2.7 million related to alternative fuel mixture credits earned in 2009. The CBPC claimed is attributable to black liquor produced and burned from January 1, 2009 through February 19, 2009, after which we began mixing black liquor and diesel fuel to qualify for alternative fuel mixture credits.
 
In October 2010, the IRS issued further guidance concluding that both the alternative fuel mixture credit and the cellulosic biofuel production credit can be claimed in the same year, but only for different volumes of black liquor.
 
With respect to CBPC, although we do not intend to claim any additional credits, we could amend our 2009 federal tax return and claim additional credits. If we were to elect to do so, we would be required to return cash already received from alternative fuel mixture credits, since we can only claim either the alternative fuel mixture credit or CBPC. The ability to realize the value of any additional CBPC depends on future taxable income. We continue to evaluate opportunities, if any, to claim additional CBPC from qualifying activities based on the results of our ongoing operations.
 
Foreign Currency  In 2010, we owned and operated manufacturing facilities in Canada, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the Philippines. The functional currency in Canada is the U.S. dollar, in Germany and France it is the Euro, in the UK it is the British Pound Sterling, and in the Philippines it is the Peso. During 2010, Euro functional currency operations generated approximately 25.5% of our sales and 24.6% of operating expenses and British Pound Sterling operations represented 8.8% of net sales and 8.7% of operating expenses. The translation of the results from international operations into U.S. dollars is subject to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The table below summarizes the translation impact on reported results that changes in currency exchange rates had on ournon-U.S. basedoperations from the conversion of these operation’s results:
 
        
   Year Ended
  
  In thousands  December 31, 2010  
   Favorable
   (unfavorable)
Net sales
  $(15,000)  
        
Costs of products sold
   10,891   
        
SG&A expenses
   791   
        
Income taxes and other
   468   
        
        
Net income
  $(2,850)  
        
 
The above table only presents the financial reporting impact of foreign currency translations. It does not present the impact of certain competitive advantages or disadvantages of operating or competing in multi-currency markets.
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
2009 versus 2008
 
The following table sets forth summarized consolidated results of operations:
 
             
   Year Ended December 31  
  In thousands, except per share  2009  2008  
Net sales
  $1,184,010   $1,263,850   
             
Gross profit
   269,764    177,782   
             
Operating income
   160,405    99,209   
             
Net income
   123,442    57,888   
             
Earnings per diluted share
   2.70    1.27   
             
 
The consolidated results of operations for 2009 and 2008 include the following items not considered to be part of our core business operations:
 
             
   After-tax
     
  In thousands, except per share  Income (loss)  Diluted EPS  
2009
            
             
Alternative fuel mixture credits
  $95,764   $2.09   
             
Acquisition related costs
   (1,768)   (0.04)  
             
2008
            
             
Gains on sale of timberlands
  $10,984   $0.24   
             
Reversal of shutdown and restructuring charges
   517    0.01   
             
Acquisition integration costs
   (889)   (0.02)  
             

18


Table of Contents

These items increased earnings by $94.0 million, or $2.05 per diluted share in 2009. Comparatively, the items identified above increased earnings in 2008 by $10.6 million, or $0.23 per diluted share.
                                        
  Business Unit Performance
  Year Ended December 31
 
  Dollars in millions  Specialty Papers Composite Fibers Other and Unallocated Total  
   2009  2008 2009  2008 2009  2008 2009  2008  
Net sales
  $791.9   $833.9  $392.1   $430.0  $   $  $1,184.0   $1,263.9   
Energy and related sales, net
   13.3    9.4                 13.3    9.4   
                                        
Total revenue
   805.2    843.3   392.1    430.0          1,197.3    1,273.2   
Cost of products sold
   693.9    739.5   334.4    366.8   (100.7)   (10.8)  927.6    1,095.4   
                                        
Gross profit (loss)
   111.3    103.8   57.7    63.2   100.7    10.8   269.8    177.8   
SG&A
   55.4    54.6   35.8    38.2   19.1    5.1   110.3    97.9   
Reversal of shutdown and restructuring charges
                     (0.9)      (0.9)  
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
                 (0.9)   (18.5)  (0.9)   (18.5)  
                                        
Total operating income (loss)
   55.9    49.2   21.9    25.0   82.6    25.1   160.4    99.2   
Nonoperating income (expense)
                 (17.3)   (18.2)  (17.3)   (18.2)  
                                        
Income (loss) before income taxes
  $55.9   $49.2  $21.9   $25.0  $65.3   $6.9  $143.1   $81.0   
                                        
Supplementary Data
                                       
Net tons sold (in thousands)
   738.8    743.8   80.1    85.6          818.9    829.4   
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
  $37.5   $35.0  $23.7   $25.6  $   $  $61.3   $60.6   
Capital expenditures
   14.2    20.9   12.1    31.6          26.3    52.5   
                                        
 
Sales and Costs of Products Sold
 
                 
   Year Ended December 31    
  In thousands  2009  2008 Change  
Net sales
  $1,184,010   $1,263,850  $(79,840)  
                 
Energy and related sales – net
   13,332    9,364   3,968   
                 
                 
Total revenues
   1,197,342    1,273,214   (75,872)  
                 
Costs of products sold(1)
   927,578    1,095,432   (167,854)  
                 
                 
Gross profit
  $269,764   $177,782  $91,982   
                 
                 
Gross profit as a percent of Net sales
   22.8%   14.1%      
                 
 
(1)2009 includes $107.8 million of alternative fuel mixture credits, net of related expenses.
 
The following table sets forth the contribution to consolidated net sales by each business unit:
 
             
   Percent of total  
   2009  2008  
Business Unit
            
             
Specialty Papers
   66.9%   66.0%  
             
Composite Fibers
   33.1    34.0   
             
             
Total
   100.0%   100.0%  
             
 
Net sales  Net sales totaled $1,184.0 million for 2009, a decrease of $79.8 million, or 6.3%, compared to 2008.
 
In the Specialty Papers business unit, 2009 net sales decreased $42.0 million to $791.9 million. Operating income increased $6.7 million in the year over year comparison and totaled $55.9 million in 2009. The improvement in operating income was primarily due to $12.2 million of productivity efficiencies and cost reduction initiatives and $4.5 million of lower input costs. These favorable factors were offset by $7.6 million of lower volumes and mix impact and $2.1 million of lower selling prices. Operating income was also adversely impacted by the costs of unplanned downtime at the Spring Grove and Chillicothe facilities totaling approximately $6.6 million in 2009 compared to 2008.
 
We sell excess power generated by the Spring Grove, PA facility pursuant to a long-term contract that expired March 31, 2010. The following table summarizes this activity for each of the past two years:
 
                  
  In thousands  2009  2008  Change  
Energy sales
  $20,128   $19,731   $397   
                  
Costs to produce
   (11,883)   (10,367)   (1,516)  
                  
                  
Net
   8,245    9,364    (1,119)  
                  
Renewable energy credits
   5,087        5,087   
                  
                  
Total
  $13,332   $9,364   $3,968   
                  
 
Renewable energy credits (“RECs”) represent sales of certified credits earned related to burning renewable sources of energy such as black liquor and wood waste.
 
In Composite Fibers, 2009 net sales were $392.1 million, a decline of $37.9 million from 2008. Operating income declined by $3.0 million in the comparison to $21.9 million. Total volumes shipped by this business unit declined 6.5% led by lower shipments of composite laminates and food & beverage paper products, which declined 18.5% and 5.5%, respectively. The translation of foreign currencies adversely impacted net sales by $23.0 million; however, higher average selling prices contributed $6.2 million.
 
Energy and raw material costs in the Composite Fibers business unit were $3.9 million higher in 2009 than in 2008. Market-related downtime adversely impacted operating results by $7.4 million in 2009 compared to 2008.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    19


Table of Contents

Pension Expense/Income  The following table summarizes the amounts of pension (expense) or income recognized for 2009 compared to 2008:
 
                 
   Year Ended
    
   December 31    
  In thousands  2009  2008 Change  
Recorded as:
                
Costs of products sold
  $(4,936)  $11,067  $(16,003)  
SG&A expense
   (2,097)   4,995   (7,092)  
                 
Total
  $(7,033)  $16,062  $(23,095)  
                 
 
The amount of pension expense or income recognized each year is determined using various actuarial assumptions and certain other factors, including the fair value of our pension assets as of the beginning of the year. The fair value of the plans’ assets declined approximately 29% during 2008. As a result, during 2009 we recognized net pension expense totaling approximately $7.0 million, on a pre-tax basis. However, we were not required to make cash contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2009.
 
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”)  SG&A expenses increased $12.4 million in theyear-to-yearcomparison and totaled $110.3 million for 2009. In 2009, SG&A included $2.1 million of pension expense compared with $5.0 million of pension income in 2008. In addition, we incurred higher legal and professional fees related to the Fox River environmental matter and the Concert acquisition.
 
Gain on Sales of Plant, Equipment and Timberlands, net  During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we completed sales of timberlands which are summarized by the following table:
 
                 
  Dollars in thousands  Acres  Proceeds Gain  
2009
                
                 
Timberlands
   319   $951  $906   
                 
Other
   n/a       (8)  
                 
                 
Total
       $951  $898   
                 
                 
2008
                
                 
Timberlands
   4,561   $19,279  $18,649   
                 
Other
   n/a       (181)  
                 
                 
Total
       $19,279  $18,468   
                 
 
In connection with each of the asset sales set forth above, we received cash proceeds.
 
Income taxes  Our results of operations for 2009 reflect an effective tax rate of 13.8% compared to 28.6% in 2008. The lower tax rate in 2009 was primarily due to a tax benefit of $27.1 million due to nontaxable alternative fuel mixture credits, and from a lower proportion of timberland gains, which are taxed at a higher effective tax rate.
 
Foreign Currency  In 2009, we owned and operated paper and pulp mills in Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the Philippines. The functional currency in Germany and France is the Euro, in the UK it is the British Pound Sterling, and in the Philippines it is the Peso. During 2009, Euro functional currency operations generated approximately 19.8% of our sales and 18.9% of operating expenses and British Pound Sterling operations represented 10.6% of net sales and 10.8% of operating expenses. The translation of the results from international operations into U.S. dollars is subject to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The table below summarizes the translation impact on reported results that changes in currency exchange rates had on ournon-U.S. basedoperations from the conversion of these operation’s results:
 
        
   Year Ended
  
  In thousands  December 31, 2009  
   Favorable
   (unfavorable)
Net sales
  $(22,975)  
        
Costs of products sold
   24,116   
        
SG&A expenses
   3,233   
        
Income taxes and other
   883   
        
        
Net income
  $5,257   
        
 
The above table only presents the financial reporting impact of foreign currency translations. It does not present the impact of certain competitive advantages or disadvantages of operating or competing in multi-currency markets.
 
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
Our business is capital intensive and requires significant expenditures for new or enhanced equipment, for environmental compliance matters including, but not limited to, the Clean Air Act, to support our research and development efforts and for our business strategy. In addition, we have mandatory debt service requirements of both principal and interest. The following table summarizes cash flow information for each of the years presented:
 
             
   Year Ended
  
   December 31  
  In thousands  2010  2009  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
  $135,420   $32,234   
             
Cash provided by (used for)
            
             
Operating activities
   168,005    163,868   
             
Investing activities
   (264,217)   12,544   
             
Financing activities
   59,681    (75,329)  
             
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
   (3,101)   2,103   
             
             
Net cash (used) provided
   (39,632)   103,186   
             
             
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $95,788   $135,420   
             
 
At the end of the 2010, we had $95.8 million in cash and cash equivalents and $219.6 million available under our revolving credit agreement, which matures in May 2014. Operating cash flow improved by $4.1 million primarily due to cash received from alternative fuel mixture credits offset by less provision of cash from

20


Table of Contents

working capital in 2010 than in 2009. In January 2009, we used $6.5 million to satisfy a commitment we had to fund certain Fox River environmental remediation activities.
 
Net cash used by investing activities totaled $264.2 million in 2010 reflecting the Concert acquisition. Capital expenditures totaled $36.5 million and $26.2 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. Capital expenditures are expected to approximate $60 million to $65 million in 2011.
 
Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $59.7 million in 2010, reflecting increased borrowings to fund the Concert acquisition including the proceeds, net of debt issue costs and original issue discount, from the issuance of $100.0 million of senior notes, at 95% of par. In addition, during 2010, we refinanced our revolving credit facility and repaid a $14.0 million term loan. In 2009, net cash used for financing activities totaled $75.3 million, primarily reflecting reductions of debt including $34.0 million repaid in connection with the unwinding of the 2003 timberland installment sale.
 
During 2010 and 2009, cash dividends paid on common stock totaled $16.7 million and $16.6 million, respectively. Our Board of Directors determines what, if any, dividends will be paid to our shareholders. Dividend payment decisions are based upon then-existing factors and conditions and, therefore, historical trends of dividend payments are not necessarily indicative of future payments.
 
The following table sets forth our outstanding long-term indebtedness:
 
             
   December 31  
  In thousands  2010  2009  
Revolving credit facility, due April 2011
   n/a   $   
             
Revolving credit facility, due May 2014
  $    n/a   
             
Term Loan, due April 2011
       14,000   
             
71/8% Notes, due May 2016
   200,000    200,000   
             
71/8% Notes, due May 2016 – net of original issue discount
   95,529        
             
Term Loan, due January 2013
   36,695    36,695   
             
             
Total long-term debt
   332,224    250,695   
             
Less current portion
       (13,759)  
             
             
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
  $332,224   $236,936   
             
 
Our credit agreement contains a number of customary compliance covenants. In addition, the Senior Notes contain cross default provisions that could result in all such notes becoming due and payable in the event of a failure to repay debt outstanding under the credit agreement at maturity, or a default under the credit agreement, that accelerates the debt outstanding thereunder. As of December 31, 2010, we met all of the requirements of our debt covenants.
 
The significant terms of the debt instruments are more fully discussed in Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 16.
 
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations which operate to protect the environment as well as human health and safety. We have, at various times, incurred significant costs to comply with these regulations, as new regulations are developed or regulatory priorities change. Currently, we anticipate that we could incur material capital and operating costs to comply with several air quality regulations including the U.S. EPA Best Available Retrofit Technology rule (BART; otherwise known as the Regional Haze Rule) and the Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology rule (Boiler MACT). Although we are in the process of analyzing the potential impact of these requirements, compliance could require significant capital expenditures. In addition, we may incur obligations to remove or mitigate any adverse effects on the environment resulting from our operations, including the restoration of natural resources and liability for personal injury and for damages to property and natural resources. See Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 20 for a summary of significant environmental matters.
 
We expect to meet all of our near and long-term cash needs from a combination of operating cash flow, cash and cash equivalents, and our existing credit facilities. However, as discussed in Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 20, an unfavorable outcome of various environmental matters could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, liquidityand/orresults of operations.
 
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements  As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had not entered into any off-balance-sheet arrangements. Financial derivative instruments to which we are a party and guarantees of indebtedness, which solely consist of obligations of subsidiaries and a partnership, are reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets included herein in Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
 

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    21


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations  The following table sets forth contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010:
 
                        
     Payments Due During the Year
     Ended December 31,
       2012 to
 2014 to
 2016 and
  
  In millions  Total 2011 2013 2015 beyond  
Long-term debt(1)
  $456  $22  $80  $43  $311   
                        
Operating leases(2)
   26   8   8   3   7   
                        
Purchase obligations(3)
   135   88   33   5   9   
                        
Other long-term obligations(4),(5)
   94   17   17   18   42   
                        
                        
Total
  $711  $135  $138  $69  $369   
                        
 
(1)Represents principal and interest payments due on long-term debt. At December 31, 2010, we had $300.0 million of debt maturing in May 2016 and bearing a fixed rate of interest at 71/8%, payable semiannually, and a $36.7 million note maturing in January 2013 bearing interest at six-month reserve adjusted LIBOR plus a margin rate of 1.66% per annum.
 
(2)Represents rental agreements for various land, buildings, vehicles, and computer and office equipment.
 
(3)Represents open purchase order commitments and other obligations, primarily for raw material forward purchases and pulpwood contracts with minimum annual purchase obligations. In certain situations, prices are subject to variations based on market prices. In such situations, the information above is based on prices in effect at December 31, 2010 or expectations based on historical experience and/or current market conditions.
 
(4)Primarily represents expected benefits to be paid pursuant to retirement medical plans and nonqualified pension plans over the next ten years and expected costs of asset retirement obligations.
 
(5)Since we are unable to reasonably estimate the timing of ultimate payment, the amounts set forth above do not include any payments that may be made related to uncertain tax positions, including potential interest, accounted for in accordance withASC 740-10-20.As discussed in more detail in Item 8 – Financial Statements, Note 8, “Income Taxes”, such amounts totaled $38.7 million at December 31, 2010.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
The preceding discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial position and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to inventories, long-lived assets, pension and post-retirement obligations, environmental liabilities and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
 
We believe the following represent the most significant and subjective estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
 
Inventory Reserves  We maintain reserves for excess and obsolete inventories to reflect our inventory at the lower of its stated cost or market value. Our estimate for excess and obsolete inventory is based upon our assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual conditions are less favorable than those we have projected, we may need to increase our reserves for excess and obsolete inventories. Any increases in our reserves will adversely impact our results of operations. The establishment of a reserve for excess and obsolete inventory establishes a new cost basis in the inventory. Such reserves are not reduced until the product is sold. If we are able to sell such inventory, any related reserves would be reversed in the period of sale.
 
Long-lived Assets  We evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived assets, including plant, equipment, timberlands, goodwill and other intangible assets periodically or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Our evaluations include analyses based on the cash flows generated by the underlying assets, profitability information, including estimated future operating results, trends or other determinants of fair value. If the value of an asset determined by these evaluations is less than its carrying amount, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the asset. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of the related business may indicate an inability to recover the carrying value of the assets, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future.
 
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Obligations  Accounting for defined-benefit pension plans, and any curtailments thereof, requires various assumptions, including, but not limited to, discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets and future compensation growth rates. Accounting for our retiree medical plans, and any curtailments thereof, also requires various assumptions, which include, but are not limited to, discount rates and annual rates of increase in the per capita costs of health care benefits. We evaluate these assumptions at least once each year or as facts and circumstances dictate and we make changes as

22


Table of Contents

conditions warrant. Changes to these assumptions will increase or decrease our reported income or expense, which will result in changes to the recorded benefit plan assets and liabilities.
 
Environmental Liabilities  We maintain accruals for losses associated with environmental obligations when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing legislation and remediation technologies. These accruals are adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation actions continueand/orfurther legal or technical information develops. Such undiscounted liabilities are exclusive of any insurance or other claims against third parties. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties, including insurance carriers, are recorded as assets when their receipt is assured beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
Income Taxes  We record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in our balance sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. These deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when such amounts are expected to reverse or be utilized. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning strategies. If we are unable to generate sufficient future taxable income, or if there is a material change in the actual effective tax rates or time period within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable or deductible, we could be required to increase the valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, which may result in a substantial increase in our effective tax rate and a material adverse impact on our reported results.
 
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes and recording the related assets and liabilities. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is less than certain. We and our subsidiaries are examined by various Federal, State and foreign tax authorities. We regularly assess the potential outcomes of these examinations and any future examinations for the current or prior years in determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. We continually assess the likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and adjust the income tax provision, the current liability and deferred taxes in the period in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.
 
Other significant accounting policies, not involving the same level of uncertainties as those discussed above, are nevertheless important to an understanding of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Refer to Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional accounting policies.
 
ITEM 7A  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
                                 
   Year Ended December 31  At December 31, 2010  
    
  Dollars in thousands  2011 2012 2013 2014 2015  Carrying Value Fair Value  
Long-term debt
                                
Average principal outstanding
                                
At fixed interest rates – Senior Notes
  $295,874  $296,600  $297,389  $298,244  $299,171   $295,529  $304,115   
At variable interest rates
   36,695   36,695   1,407          36,695   37,780   
                                 
                        $332,224  $341,895   
                                 
Weighted-average interest rate
                                
Fixed interest rate debt – Senior Notes
   7.13%  7.13%  7.13%  7.13%  7.13%           
Variable interest rate debt
   1.66%  1.66%  1.66%                 
                                 
 
The table above presents the average principal outstanding and related interest rates for the next five years for debt outstanding as of December 31, 2010. Fair values included herein have been determined based upon rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.
 
Our market risk exposure primarily results from changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. At December 31, 2010, we had long-term debt outstanding of $332.2 million, of which $36.7 million or 10.0% was at variable interest rates. Variable-rate debt outstanding represents a cash collateralized borrowing incurred in connection with the 2007 installment timberland sale that accrues interest based on 6 month LIBOR plus a margin. At December 31, 2010, the weighted-average interest rate paid was approximately 1.66%. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in the interest rate on variable rate debt would increase or decrease annual interest expense by $0.4 million.
 
We are subject to certain risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates to the extent our operations are conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. During 2010, Euro functional currency operations generated approximately 25.5% of our sales and 24.6% of operating expenses and British Pound Sterling operations represented 8.8% of net sales and 8.7% of operating expenses.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    23


Table of Contents

 
ITEM 8  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
 
 
Management of P. H. Glatfelter Company (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the chief executive and chief financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
 
As of December 31, 2010, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the framework established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). We excluded from our assessment, as permitted under the applicable SEC rules, regulations and related interpretations, the internal control over financial reporting of Concert Industries Corp., which was acquired on February 12, 2010, and whose total assets constitute 21% of total assets, and which represented 13% of total net sales, of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. Management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 is effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
 
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
 
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.
 
The Company’s management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all frauds. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based, in part, on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

24


Table of Contents

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of P. H. Glatfelter Company
 
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting of Concert Industries Corp., which was acquired on February 12, 2010 and whose total assets constitute 21% of total assets, and which represented 13% of total net sales, of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at Concert Industries Corp. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
 
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 of the Company and our report dated March 11, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.
 
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
   Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 11, 2011

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    25


Table of Contents

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of P. H. Glatfelter Company
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
 
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 11, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 11, 2011

26


Table of Contents

P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
                 
   Year Ended December 31  
 In thousands, except per share  2010  2009 2008  
 
Net sales
  $1,455,331   $1,184,010  $1,263,850   
Energy and related sales – net
   10,653    13,332   9,364   
                 
Total revenues
   1,465,984    1,197,342   1,273,214   
Costs of products sold
   1,279,737    927,578   1,095,432   
                 
Gross profit
   186,247    269,764   177,782   
Selling, general and administrative expenses
   122,111    110,257   97,897   
Reversal of shutdown and restructuring charges
          (856)  
Gains on disposition of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
   (453)   (898)  (18,468)  
                 
Operating income
   64,589    160,405   99,209   
Other nonoperating income (expense)
                
Interest expense
   (25,547)   (19,220)  (23,160)  
Interest income
   808    1,886   4,975   
Other – net
   (6,321)   75   2   
                 
Total other nonoperating expense
   (31,060)   (17,259)  (18,183)  
                 
Income before income taxes
   33,529    143,146   81,026   
                 
Income tax (benefit) provision
   (20,905)   19,704   23,138   
                 
Net income
  $54,434   $123,442  $57,888   
                 
                 
Weighted average shares outstanding
                
Basic
   45,922    45,678   45,247   
Diluted
   46,374    45,774   45,572   
Earnings per share
                
Basic
  $1.19   $2.70  $1.28   
Diluted
   1.17    2.70   1.27   
    
    
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    27


Table of Contents

P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
             
   December 31  
  Dollars in thousands, except par values  2010  2009  
 
Assets
            
Current assets
            
Cash and cash equivalents
  $95,788   $135,420   
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts:
            
2010 – $3,118; 2009 – $2,888)
   141,208    119,319   
Inventories
   201,077    168,370   
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   64,617    96,947   
             
Total current assets
   502,690    520,056   
Plant, equipment and timberlands – net
   608,170    470,632   
Other long-term assets
   230,887    199,606   
             
Total assets
  $1,341,747   $1,190,294   
             
             
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
            
Current liabilities
            
Current portion of long-term debt
  $   $13,759   
Short-term debt
   798    3,888   
Accounts payable
   98,594    63,604   
Dividends payable
   4,190    4,170   
Environmental liabilities
   248    440   
Other current liabilities
   109,316    100,249   
             
Total current liabilities
   213,146    186,110   
Long-term debt
   332,224    236,936   
Deferred income taxes
   94,918    96,668   
Other long-term liabilities
   149,017    159,876   
             
Total liabilities
   789,305    679,590   
Commitments and contingencies
          
Shareholders’ equity
            
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized – 120,000,000 shares; issued – 54,361,980 shares (including shares in treasury: 2010 – 8,385,772; 2009 – 8,655,826)
   544    544   
Capital in excess of par value
   48,145    46,746   
Retained earnings
   749,453    711,765   
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
   (121,247)   (119,885)  
             
    676,895    639,170   
Less cost of common stock in treasury
   (124,453)   (128,466)  
             
Total shareholders’ equity
   552,442    510,704   
             
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $1,341,747   $1,190,294   
             
             
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

28


Table of Contents

P.H. GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
                 
   Year Ended December 31  
  In thousands  2010  2009 2008  
 
Operating activities
                
Net income
  $54,434   $123,442  $57,888   
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operations:
                
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
   65,839    61,256   60,611   
Amortization of debt issuance costs and original issue discount
   2,758    1,690   1,654   
Pension expense (income), net of unfunded benefits paid
   8,637    6,343   (16,062)  
Reversals of shutdown and restructuring charges
          (856)  
Deferred income taxes
   (16,815)   (22,981)  3,265   
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
   (453)   (898)  (18,468)  
Share-based compensation
   5,767    4,599   4,350   
Alternative fuel mixture credits, net of credits applied to taxes due
   54,880    (57,946)     
Change in operating assets and liabilities
                
Accounts receivable
   (598)   16,542   (17,668)  
Inventories
   (7,592)   28,207   (9,975)  
Prepaid and other current assets
   (13,318)   1,451   871   
Accounts payable
   21,064    2,390   4,264   
Environmental matters
   (29)   (7,728)  (13,012)  
Accruals and other current liabilities
   (1,490)   6,676   (10,557)  
Other
   (5,079)   825   7,120   
                 
Net cash provided by operations
   168,005    163,868   53,425   
Investing activities
                
Expenditures for purchases of plant, equipment and timberlands
   (36,491)   (26,257)  (52,469)  
Proceeds from disposal of plant, equipment and timberlands
   564    951   19,279   
Proceeds from timberland installment sale note receivable
       37,850      
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
   (228,290)         
                 
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities
   (264,217)   12,544   (33,190)  
Financing activities
                
Proceeds from $100 million 71/8% note offering, net of original issue discount
   95,000          
Payments of note offering and credit facility costs
   (5,340)         
Net repayments of revolving credit facility
       (6,725)  (24,197)  
Repayments of $100 million term loan facility
   (14,000)   (16,000)  (13,000)  
Net (repayments of) proceeds from other short-term debt
   (3,208)   (2,008)  2,927   
(Repayments of) proceeds from borrowing under Term Loans due 2013
       (34,000)  36,695   
Payment of dividends
   (16,746)   (16,596)  (16,469)  
Proceeds and excess tax benefits from stock options exercised and proceeds from government grants
   3,975       1,165   
                 
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
   59,681    (75,329)  (12,879)  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
   (3,101)   2,103   (4,955)  
                 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
   (39,632)   103,186   2,401   
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
   135,420    32,234   29,833   
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period
  $95,788   $135,420  $32,234   
                 
                 
Supplemental cash flow information
                
Cash paid (received) for
                
Interest
  $23,193   $17,338  $21,243   
Income taxes
   (40,265)   16,634   20,011   
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    29


Table of Contents

P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
 
                           
        Accumulated
      
    Capital in
   Other
   Total
  
  Common
 Excess of
 Retained
 Comprehensive
 Treasury
 Shareholders’
  
In thousands Stock Par Value Earnings Income (Loss) Stock Equity  
 
 
Balance at January 1, 2008
 $544  $44,697  $563,608  $4,061  $(136,842) $476,068   
Net income
          57,888           57,888   
Foreign currency translation adjustments
              (32,029)          
Change in benefit plans’ net funded status, net of tax benefit of $92,570
              (148,165)          
                           
Other comprehensive income
              (180,194)      (180,194)  
                           
Comprehensive income
                      (122,306)  
Tax effect on employee stock options exercised
      38               38   
Cash dividends declared ($0.36 per share)
          (16,495)          (16,495)  
Share-based compensation expense
      3,244               3,244   
Delivery of treasury shares
                          
Performance Shares
      (1,739)          1,400   (339)  
401(k) plans
      (248)          1,768   1,520   
Director compensation
      (43)          206   163   
Employee stock options exercised – net
      (143)          957   814   
     
     
Balance at December 31, 2008
  544   45,806   605,001   (176,133)  (132,511)  342,707   
Comprehensive income
                          
Net income
          123,442           123,442   
Foreign currency translation adjustments
              11,941           
Change in benefit plans’ net funded status, net of taxes of $27,164
              44,307           
                           
Other comprehensive income
              56,248       56,248   
                           
Comprehensive income
                      179,690   
Cash dividends declared ($0.36 per share)
          (16,678)          (16,678)  
Share-based compensation expense
      3,502               3,502   
Delivery of treasury shares
                          
RSUs
      (1,483)          1,280   (203)  
401(k) plans
      (995)          2,517   1,522   
Director compensation
      (84)          248   164   
     
     
Balance at December 31, 2009
  544   46,746   711,765   (119,885)  (128,466)  510,704   
Comprehensive income
                          
Net income
          54,434           54,434   
Foreign currency translation adjustments
              (17,227)          
Change in benefit plans’ net funded status, net of taxes of $9,905
              15,865           
                           
Other comprehensive income
              (1,362)      (1,362)  
                           
Comprehensive income
                      53,072   
Tax effect on employee stock options exercised
      (50)              (50)  
Cash dividends declared ($0.36 per share)
          (16,746)          (16,746)  
Share-based compensation expense
      3,962               3,962   
Delivery of treasury shares
                          
RSUs
      (2,152)          1,662   (490)  
401(k) plans
      (318)          1,960   1,642   
Director compensation
      (16)          179   163   
Employee stock options exercised – net
      (27)          212   185   
     
     
Balance at December 31, 2010
 $544  $48,145  $749,453  $(121,247) $(124,453) $552,442   
   
   

30


Table of Contents

P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
1.  ORGANIZATION
 
P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries (“Glatfelter”) is a manufacturer of specialty papers and fiber-based engineered materials. Headquartered in York, Pennsylvania, our manufacturing facilities are located in Spring Grove, Pennsylvania; Chillicothe and Freemont, Ohio; Gatineau, Quebec Canada; Gloucestershire (Lydney), England; Caerphilly, Wales; Gernsbach and Falkenhagen, Germany; Scaër, France; and the Philippines. Our products are marketed worldwide, either through wholesale paper merchants, brokers and agents or directly to customers.
 
2.  ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Principles of Consolidation  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Glatfelter and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
 
Accounting Estimates  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingencies as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management believes the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are reasonable, based upon currently available facts and known circumstances, but recognizes that actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents  We classify all highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase as cash equivalents.
 
Inventories  Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Raw materials, in-process and finished inventories of our domestic manufacturing operations are valued using thelast-in,first-out (LIFO) method, and the supplies inventories are valued principally using the average-cost method. Inventories at our foreign operations are valued using the average cost method.
 
Plant, Equipment and Timberlands  For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets.
 
The range of estimated service lives used to calculate financial reporting depreciation for principal items of plant and equipment are as follows:
 
     
Buildings
  10 – 45 Years 
Machinery and equipment
  7 – 35 Years 
Other
  4 – 40 Years 
 
Maintenance and Repairs  Maintenance and repairs costs are charged to income and major renewals and betterments are capitalized. At the time property is retired or sold, the net carrying value is eliminated and any resultant gain or loss is included in income.
 
Valuation of Long-lived Assets, Intangible Assets and Goodwill  We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment when a specific event indicates that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability is assessed based on estimates of future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If the sum of expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the asset, the asset’s fair value is estimated and an impairment loss is recognized for any deficiencies. Goodwill is reviewed, on a discounted cash flow basis, during the third quarter of each year for impairment. Impairment losses, if any, are recognized for the amount by which the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value. The carrying value of a reporting unit is defined using an enterprise premise which is generally determined by the difference between the unit’s assets and operating liabilities.
 
Asset Retirement Obligations  In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)No. 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations,we accrue asset retirement obligations in the period in which obligations relating to future asset retirements are incurred and when a reasonable estimate of fair value can be determined. Under these standards, costs are to be accrued at estimated fair value, and a related long-lived asset is capitalized. Over time, the liability is accreted to its settlement value and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset for which the obligation exists. Upon settlement of the liability, we recognize a gain or loss for any difference between the settlement amount and the liability recorded.
 
Income Taxes  Income taxes are determined using the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740 Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Under ASC 740, tax expense includes U.S. and international income taxes plus the provision for

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    31


Table of Contents

 
U.S. taxes on undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries not deemed to be permanently invested. Tax credits and other incentives reduce tax expense in the year the credits are claimed. Certain items of income and expense are not reported in tax returns and financial statements in the same year. The tax effect of such temporary differences is reported in deferred income taxes. Deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not that the assets will be realized in future years. We establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which realization is not more likely than not.
 
Income tax contingencies are accounted for in accordance with FASBASC 740-10-20Income Taxes (formerly FASB Interpretation No. 48,“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”). Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes and recording the related assets and liabilities. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is less than certain. We and our subsidiaries are examined by various Federal, State and foreign tax authorities. We regularly assess the potential outcomes of these examinations and any future examinations for the current or prior years in determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. We continually assess the likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and record any necessary adjustments in the period in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.
 
Treasury Stock  Common stock purchased for treasury is recorded at cost. At the date of subsequent reissue, the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock on the weighted-average cost basis.
 
Foreign Currency Translation  Foreign currency translation gains and losses and the effect of exchange rate changes on transactions designated as hedges of net foreign investments are included as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). Transaction gains and losses are included in income in the period in which they occur.
 
Revenue Recognition  We recognize revenue on product sales when the customer takes title and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership. Estimated costs for sales incentives, discounts and sales returns and allowances are recorded as sales reductions in the period in which the related revenue is recognized.
 
Revenue from energy sales is recognized when electricity is delivered to the customer. Certain costs associated with the production of electricity, such as fuel, labor, depreciation and maintenance are netted against energy sales for presentation on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Our fixed-price contract to sell electricity generated in excess of our own use expired March 31, 2010. Subsequent to the expiration, we now sell excess power at market-rates.
 
Revenue from renewable energy credits is recognized when all risks, rights and rewards to the certificate are transferred to the counterparty.
 
Environmental Liabilities  Accruals for losses associated with environmental obligations are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on existing legislation and remediation technologies. Costs related to environmental remediation are charged to expense. These accruals are adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation actions continueand/orfurther legal or technical information develops. Such undiscounted liabilities are exclusive of any insurance or other claims against third parties. Environmental costs are capitalized if the costs extend the life of the asset, increase its capacityand/ormitigate or prevent contamination from future operations. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties, including insurance carriers, are recorded as assets when their receipt is assured beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income  The amounts reported on the consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) at December 31, 2010 consisted of a loss of $120.4 million from additional defined benefit liabilities, net of tax, and $0.8 million of losses from foreign currency translation adjustments.
 
Earnings Per Share  Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the respective periods. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of common share equivalents is considered in the diluted earnings per share computation using the treasury stock method.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments  Under the accounting for fair value measurements and disclosures, a fair value hierarchy was established that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

32


Table of Contents

 
We use the following valuation techniques to measure fair value for our assets and liabilities:
 
Level 1  Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
 
Level 2  Significant other observable inputs (e.g. quoted prices for similar items in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar items in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable such as interest rate and yield curves, and market-corroborated inputs); and
 
Level 3  Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are valued based on management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
 
3.  ACQUISITIONS
 
On February 12, 2010, we completed the acquisition of all the issued and outstanding stock of Concert Industries Corp. (“Concert”), a manufacturer of highly absorbent cellulose based airlaid non-woven materials, for cash totaling $231.1 million based on the currency exchange rates on the closing date, and net of post-closing working capital adjustments. Concert has operations located in Gatineau, Quebec, Canada and Falkenhagen, Brandenburg, Germany. Annual revenues totaled $203.0 million in 2009.
 
Concert manufactures highly absorbent cellulose based airlaid non-woven materials used in products such as feminine hygiene and adult incontinence products, pre-moistened cleaning wipes, food pads, napkins and tablecloths, and baby wipes. The acquisition of Concert affords us the opportunity to grow with our customers who are the industry leaders in feminine hygiene and adult incontinence products. We believe that our acquisition of Concert provides us with an industry-leading global business that sells highly specialized, engineered fiber-based materials to niche markets with substantial barriers to entry.
 
The share purchase agreement provides for, among other terms, indemnification provisions for claims that may arise, including among others, uncertain tax positions and other third party claims.
 
We and the sellers reached agreement on working capital related adjustments that reduced the purchase price by $4.7 million. In addition, as a result of further evaluation of asset appraisals, contingencies and other factors, in accordance with FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations, we have determined that certain retrospective adjustments to the February 12, 2010 provisional allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed were required.
 
The following summarizes the impact of the adjustments recorded in 2010 and retrospectively reflected in the financial statements. This provisional purchase price allocation is based on information currently available to management:
 
                
  As originally
       
  In thousands presented  Adjustment Adjusted  
Assets
               
Cash
 $2,792   $   $2,792   
Accounts receivable
  24,703       24,703   
Inventory
  28,034       28,034   
Prepaid and other current assets
  5,941    (1,316)  4,625   
Plant, equipment and timberlands
  177,253    8,301   185,554   
Intangible assets
  3,138    1,902   5,040   
Deferred tax assets and other assets
  20,738    (5,830)  14,908   
                
Total
  262,599    3,057   265,656   
Liabilities
               
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
  25,322    611   25,933   
Deferred tax liabilities
  1,267    3,852   5,119   
Other long term liabilities
  212    3,310   3,522   
                
Total
  26,801    7,773   34,574   
                
Total purchase price
 $235,798   $(4,716)  $231,082   
                
 
The adjustments set forth above did not materially impact previously reported results of operations, earnings per share, or cash flows.
 
We are in the process of finalizing certain contingencies and the impact on taxes of any final adjustments to such necessary to account for the Concert transaction in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting set forth in FASB ASC 805. Accordingly, the provisional purchase price allocation set forth above is based on all information available to us at the present time and is subject to change, and such changes could be material.
 
For purposes of allocating the total purchase price, assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their estimated fair market value. The allocation set forth above is based on management’s estimate of the fair value using valuation techniques such as discounted cash flow models, appraisals and similar methodologies. The amount allocated to intangible assets represents the estimated value of technology and customer sales contracts and relationships. Deferred tax assets reflect the estimated value of future tax deductions acquired in the transaction.
 
Acquired property plant and equipment are being depreciated on a straight-line basis with estimated remaining lives ranging from 5 years to 40 years. Intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated remaining life of 11 to 20 years reflecting the expected future value.
 
During 2010, we incurred legal, professional and advisory costs directly related to the Concert acquisition totaling $6.9 million. All such costs are presented under

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    33


Table of Contents

 
the caption “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Deferred financing fees incurred in connection with issuing debt related to the acquisition totaled $3.0 million. The unamortized fees are recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under the caption “Other assets”.
 
In addition, in connection with the Concert acquisition, we entered into a series of forward foreign currency contracts to hedge the acquisition’s Canadian dollar purchase price. All contracts were settled for cash during the first quarter of 2010 and resulted in a $3.4 million loss, net of realized currency translation gains, which is presented under the caption“Other-net”in the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 include the results of Concert prospectively since the acquisition was completed on February 12, 2010. All such results are reported herein as the Advanced Airlaid Materials business unit, a new reportable segment. Net sales and operating income of Concert included in our consolidated results of operations totaled $193.5 million and $4.4 million, respectively, for 2010.
 
The unaudited pro-forma results presented below include the effects of the acquisition as if it had been consummated as of January 1, 2009. The pro forma results include the amortization associated with the acquired intangible assets and interest expense associated with debt used to fund the acquisition, as well as fair value adjustments for plant, equipment and timberlands. To better reflect the combined operating results, material non-recurring charges directly attributable to the acquisition have been excluded. The unaudited pro forma financial information below is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved.
 
            
  Year Ended December 31  
  In thousands, except per share 2010  2009  
Pro forma
           
Net sales
  $1,480,980    $1,388,120   
Net income
  69,116    135,713   
Diluted earnings per share
  1.49    2.96   
            
 
For purposes of presenting the above pro forma financial information, non-recurring legal, professional and transaction costs directly related to the acquisition have been eliminated. This pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of what the operating results would have been had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the respective period nor is it indicative of future results.
 
4.  ALTERNATIVE FUEL MIXTURE CREDITS
 
The U.S. Internal Revenue Code provided a tax credit for companies that use alternative fuel mixtures to produce energy to operate their businesses. The credit, equal to $0.50 per gallon of alternative fuel contained in the mixture, is refundable to the taxpayer. On May 11, 2009, we were notified by the Internal Revenue Service that our application to be registered as an alternative fuel mixer was approved. We earned $107.8 million of alternative fuel mixture credits for the alternative fuel mixture consumed during the period February 20, 2009 through December 31, 2009. We record all alternative fuel mixture credits as a reduction to cost of goods sold and the net credit claimed is recorded in 2009 under the caption “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 
The alternative fuel mixture credit expired on December 31, 2009. For information related to the Cellulosic Biofuel Credit, see Note 8 – Income Taxes.
 
5.  ENERGY AND RELATED SALES, NET
 
We sell excess power generated by the Spring Grove, PA facility. Prior to the March 31, 2010 expiration of a long-term contract, all sales were at a fixed price. Subsequently, we sell excess power at prevailing market rates. We also sell renewable energy credits generated by the Spring Grove, PA and Chillicothe, OH facilities representing sales of certified credits earned related to burning renewable sources of energy such as black liquor and wood waste.
 
The following table summarizes this activity for each of the past three years:
 
                
  In thousands 2010  2009 2008  
Energy sales
  $14,296    $20,128   $19,731   
Costs to produce
  (10,403)   (11,883)  (10,367)  
                
Net energy sales
  3,893    8,245   9,364   
Renewable energy credits
  6,760    5,087      
                
Total energy and related sales , net
  $10,653    $13,332   $9,364   
                
 
6.  GAIN ON DISPOSITIONS OF PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND TIMBERLANDS
 
During 2010, 2009 and 2008, we completed the following sales of assets:
 
                
  Dollars in thousands Acres  Proceeds Gain  
2010
               
Timberlands
  164   $387  $373   
Other
  n/a    177   80   
                
Total
      $564  $453   
                
2009
               
Timberlands
  319   $951  $906   
Other
  n/a       (8)  
                
Total
      $951  $898   
                
2008
               
Timberlands
  4,561   $19,279  $18,649   
Other
  n/a       (181)  
                
Total
      $19,279  $18,468   
                

34


Table of Contents

 
The amounts set forth above for 2008 include a $2.9 million gain from the sale of 246 acres of timberlands for cash consideration to George H. Glatfelter II, our retired chief executive officer, and his spouse. The 246 acres of timberlands had been independently appraised and marketed for public sale by us. Based on those appraisals and the marketing process that was pursued, we and our Board believed that the sale price agreed to with the Glatfelters constituted fair market value for the timberland.
 
7.  EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
The following table sets forth the details of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS):
 
                
  In thousands, except per share 2010  2009 2008  
Net income
  $54,434   $123,442  $57,888   
                
Weighted average common shares outstanding used in basic EPS
  45,922    45,678   45,247   
Common shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive stock options, restricted stock awards and performance awards
  452    96   325   
                
Weighted average common shares outstanding and common share equivalents used in diluted EPS
  46,374    45,774   45,572   
                
Basic EPS
  $1.19   $2.70  $1.28   
Diluted EPS
  1.17    2.70   1.27   
                
 
The following table sets forth the potential common shares outstanding for stock options and restricted stock units that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS for the period indicated, because their effect would be anti-dilutive:
 
                
  In thousands 2010  2009 2008  
Potential common shares
  1,405    2,215   1,132   
                
 
8.  INCOME TAXES
 
Income taxes are recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax returns. The effects of income taxes are measured based on enacted tax laws and rates.
 
The (benefit)/provision for income taxes from operations consisted of the following:
 
                
  Year Ended December 31  
  In thousands 2010  2009 2008  
Current taxes
               
Federal
 $(8,238)  $29,848  $5,647   
State
  (392)   4,050   2,609   
Foreign
  4,540    8,787   11,617   
                
   (4,090)   42,685   19,873   
Deferred taxes and other
               
Federal
  (17,530)   (23,943)  9,026   
State
  (131)   3,760   86   
Foreign
  846    (2,798)  (5,847)  
                
   (16,815)   (22,981)  3,265   
                
Income tax (benefit)/provision
 $(20,905)  $19,704  $23,138   
                
 
The amounts set forth above for total deferred taxes and other included a deferred tax benefit of $17.6 million in 2010, a deferred tax benefit of $23.0 million in 2009 and a deferred tax provision of $3.0 million in 2008, respectively. Other taxes totaled $0.8 million, $0.0 million, and $0.2 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to uncertain tax positions expected to be taken in future tax filings.
 
The following are the domestic and foreign components of pretax income from operations:
 
                
  Year Ended December 31  
  In thousands 2010  2009 2008  
United States
 $2,384   $122,657  $61,387   
Foreign
  31,145    20,489   19,639   
                
Total pretax income
 $33,529   $143,146  $81,026   
                
 
A reconciliation between the income tax provision, computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes, and the actual income tax (benefit)/provision is as follows:
 
                
  Year Ended December 31  
  2010  2009 2008  
Federal income tax provision at statutory rate
  35.0%   35.0%  35.0%  
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
  1.4    0.7   3.1   
Foreign income tax rate differential
  (4.9)   (0.5)  (2.5)  
Change in statutory tax rates
  1.5    (0.3)     
Tax credits
  (7.8)   (1.8)  (5.7)  
Change in unrecognized tax benefits, net
  (12.4)   8.0   2.5   
Cellulosic Biofuel Credit, net of incremental state tax and manufacturing deduction benefit
  (69.3)         
Adjustment for prior year estimates
  (6.8)         
Alternative fuel mixture credits
       (26.4)     
Valuation allowance release
         (1.8)  
Other
  1.0    (0.9)  (2.0)  
                
(Benefit)/provision for income taxes
  (62.3)%   13.8%  28.6%  
                
 
The sources of deferred income taxes were as follows at December 31:
 
                    
  2010  2009  
    Non
    Non-
  
  Current
 current
  Current
 current
  
  Asset
 Asset
  Asset
 Asset
  
  In thousands (Liability) (Liability)  (Liability) (Liability)  
                    
Reserves
 $5,628  $10,422   $7,404  $9,677   
Compensation
  3,850   4,070    3,367   3,934   
Post-retirement benefits
  1,807   18,225    1,708   19,637   
Property
  692   (98,012)   12   (100,071)  
Pension
  449   (43,428)   660   (38,000)  
Installment sales
     (14,030)   (4)  (14,070)  
Inventories
  348       438      
Other
  78   5,617    258   4,608   
Tax carryforwards
  8,002   57,547       29,238   
                    
Subtotal
  20,854   (59,589)   13,843   (85,047)  
Valuation allowance
  (2,925)  (22,895)   (2,379)  (9,789)  
                    
Total
 $17,929  $(82,484)  $11,464  $(94,836)  
                    
 
The increase in the valuation allowance of $13.7 million from 2009 is primarily related to the establishment of a valuation allowance for certain acquired deferred tax assets related to Concert.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    35


Table of Contents

 
Current and non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the following balance sheet captions:
 
              
  December 31  
  In thousands 2010  2009  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 $17,929   $11,519     
              
Other long-term assets
  12,434    1,832     
              
Other current liabilities
      55     
              
Deferred income taxes
  94,918    96,668     
              
 
At December 31, 2010, we had state and foreign tax net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of $78.6 million and $273.0 million, respectively. These NOL carryforwards are available to offset future taxable income, if any. The state NOL carryforwards expire between 2014 and 2027; certain foreign NOL carryforwards expire between 2013 and 2030.
 
In addition, we had federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of $0.3 million, which expire in 2013, various state tax credit carryforwards totaling $0.4 million, which expire between 2014 and 2027, and foreign tax credits of $3.2 million which expire between 2019 and 2030.
 
We have established a valuation allowance of $25.8 million against the net deferred tax assets, primarily due to the uncertainty regarding the ability to utilize state and foreign tax NOL carryforwards and certain deferred foreign tax credits.
 
Tax credits and other incentives reduce tax expense in the year the credits are claimed. In 2010, we recorded tax credits of $2.6 million related to Research and Development credits and the fuels tax credits. In 2009 and 2008 similar tax credits of $2.6 million and $4.7 million, respectively, were recorded.
 
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, unremitted earnings of subsidiaries outside the United States deemed to be permanently reinvested totaled $160.8 million and $134.6 million, respectively. Because the unremitted earnings of subsidiaries are deemed to be permanently reinvested as of December 31, 2010, no deferred tax liability has been recognized in our consolidated financial statements.
 
In March 2010, our application to be registered as a cellulosic biofuel producer was approved by the Internal Revenue Service. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code provides a non refundable tax credit equal to $1.01 per gallon for taxpayers that produce cellulosic biofuel. In a memorandum issued in July 2010, the Internal Revenue Service issued guidance concluding that black liquor sold or used before January 1, 2010, qualifies for the cellulosic biofuel producer credit (“CBPC”) and no further certification of eligibility was needed.
 
In connection with the filing of our 2009 income tax return, we claimed $23.2 million, net of taxes, of CBPC. The CBPC claimed is attributable to black liquor produced and burned from January 1, 2009 through February 19, 2009, after which we began mixing black liquor and diesel fuel to qualify for alternative fuel mixture credits.
 
With respect to CBPC, although we do not intend to claim any additional credits, we could amend our 2009 federal tax return and claim additional credits. If we were to elect to do so, we would be required to return cash already received from alternative fuel mixture credits, since we can only claim either the alternative fuel mixture credit or CBPC. The ability to realize the value of any additional CBPC depends on future taxable income. We continue to evaluate opportunities, if any, to claim additional CBPC from qualifying activities based on the results of our ongoing operations.
 
As of December 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had $38.7 million, $40.1 million and $29.2 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits, respectively. As of December 31, 2010, if such benefits were to be recognized, approximately $35 million would be recorded as a component of income tax expense, thereby affecting our effective tax rate.
 
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
 
                
  In millions 2010  2009 2008  
Balance at January 1
  $40.1    $29.2   $26.1   
                
Increases in tax positions for prior years
  1.6    0.7   0.4   
                
Decreases in tax positions for prior years
  (1.8)         
                
Acquisition related:
               
                
Purchase accounting
  3.2          
                
Decrease for prior years(1)
  (2.2)         
                
Increases in tax positions for current year
  1.9    11.2   3.2   
                
Settlements
      (0.8)     
                
Lapse in statute of limitations
  (4.1)   (0.2)  (0.5)  
                
                
Balance at December 31
  $38.7    $40.1   $29.2   
                
 
(1)in connection with purchase accounting for the Concert transaction, we recorded a $2.2 million reserve for an uncertain tax position and at the same time recorded a receivable from the seller due to an indemnification agreement. Prior to the end of 2010, a tax ruling was issued that eliminated this tax risk resulting in the elimination of both items.
 
We, or one of our subsidiaries, file income tax returns with the United States Internal Revenue Service, as well as various state and foreign authorities. The

36


Table of Contents

 
following table summarizes tax years that remain subject to examination by major jurisdiction:
 
      
  Open Tax Years
  Examinations not yet
  Examination in
  Jurisdiction initiated  progress
 
United States
     
Federal
 2007 – 2010  N/A
State
 2005 – 2010  2004 & 2006–2008
Canada(1)
 2006 – 2010  2008 – 2009
Germany(1)
 2008 – 2010  2003 – 2009
France
 2007 – 2010  N/A
United Kingdom
 2007 – 2010  N/A
Philippines
 2010  2007 – 2009
      
 
(1)includes provincial or similar local jurisdictions, as applicable.
 
The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, which often result in proposed assessments. Management performs a comprehensive review of its global tax positions on a quarterly basis and accrues amounts for uncertain tax positions. Based on these reviews and the result of discussions and resolutions of matters with certain tax authorities and the closure of tax years subject to tax audit, reserves are adjusted as necessary. However, future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are determined or resolved or as such statutes are closed. Due to potential for resolution of federal, state and foreign examinations, and the expiration of various statutes of limitation, it is reasonably possible our gross unrecognized tax benefits balance may decrease within the next twelve months by a range of zero to $8.2 million. Substantially all of this range relates to tax positions taken in the U.S. and in Germany.
 
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense. The Company accrued minimal interest, net of reversals during 2010, and in total, as of December 31, 2010, has recognized a liability for interest of $3.8 million. During 2009, the Company accrued interest of $1.1 million, and in total, as of December 31, 2009 has recognized a liability for interest of $3.8 million. During 2008, the Company accrued interest of $0.8 million. We did not record any penalties associated with uncertain tax positions during 2010 or 2009.
 
9.  STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
 
On April 29, 2009, our shareholders approved the P. H. Glatfelter Amended and Restated Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) to authorize, among other things, the issuance of up to 5,500,000 shares of Glatfelter common stock to eligible participants. The LTIP provides for the issuance of restricted stock units, restricted stock awards, non-qualified stock options, performance shares, incentive stock options and performance units. As of December 31, 2010, 2,661,632 shares of common stock were available for future issuance under the LTIP.
 
Since the approval of the LTIP, we have issued to eligible participants restricted stock units and stock only stock appreciation rights (“SOSARs”).
 
Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”)  Awards of RSUs are made under the LTIP. Under terms of the awards, RSUs vest based solely on the passage of time on a graded scale over a three, four, and five-year period. The following table summarizes RSU activity during the past three years:
 
                 
  Units  2010  2009 2008  
Beginning balance
   564,037    486,988   505,173   
Granted
   203,889    205,360   137,649   
Forfeited
   (37,368)   (8,700)  (25,214)  
Restriction lapsed/shares delivered
   (150,757)   (119,611)  (130,620)  
                 
Ending balance
   579,801    564,037   486,988   
                 
Dollars in thousands
                
Compensation expense
   $1,708    $1,622   $1,772   
                 
 
The weighted average grant fair value per unit for awards in 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $13.24, $10.11 and $14.82, respectively. As of December 31, 2010, unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding RSUs totaled $3.4 million. The weighted average remaining period over which the expense will be recognized is 3.6 years.
 

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    37


Table of Contents

 
Stock Only Stock Appreciation Rights  The following table sets forth information related to outstanding SOSARS.
 
                            
  2010  2009 2008  
    Wtd Avg
    Wtd Avg
   Wtd Avg
  
    Exercise
    Exercise
   Exercise
  
  SOSARS Shares Price  Shares Price Shares Price  
Outstanding at Jan. 1,
  1,762,020  $11.84    718,810  $14.63   484,800  $15.30   
                            
Granted
  470,520   13.77    1,043,210   9.91   284,240   13.49   
                            
Exercised
                      
                            
Canceled
  (170,663)  11.81          (50,230)  14.63   
                            
                            
Outstanding at Dec. 31,
  2,061,877   12.28    1,762,020  $11.84   718,810  $14.63   
                            
Exercisable at Dec. 31,
  1,135,281   12.78    390,575   14.89   150,967   15.30   
                            
Vested and expected to vest
  2,059,524        1,676,227       690,418       
                            
Weighted average grant date fair value per share
     $4.65       $2.83      $3.77   
                            
Aggregate grant date fair value (in thousands)
      2,179       $2,957      $1,002   
                            
Black-Scholes Assumptions
                           
                            
Dividend yield
      2.61%       3.63%      2.67%  
                            
Risk free rate of return
      2.48        2.26       3.71   
                            
Volatility
      42.34        40.59       32.09   
                            
Expected life
      6yrs        6yrs       6yrs   
                            
Compensation expense (in thousands)
 $2,254       $1,880      $1,472       
                            
 
Under terms of the SOSAR, the recipients received the right to receive a payment in the form of shares of common stock equal to the difference, if any, in the fair market value of one share of common stock at the time of exercising the SOSAR and the strike price. The SOSARs vest ratably over a three year period. As of December 31, 2010, the intrinsic value of SOSARs vested and expected to vest totaled $2.3 million.
 
Non-Qualified Stock Options  The following table summarizes the activity with respect to non-qualified stock options:
 
                            
  2010  2009 2008  
    Weighted-
    Weighted-
   Weighted-
  
    Average
    Average
   Average
  
Non-Qualified Options Shares Exercise Price  Shares Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price  
                            
Outstanding at beginning of year
  453,050  $14.20    537,700  $14.08   700,270  $13.81   
                            
Granted
                     
                            
Exercised
  (14,250)  12.95          (64,400)  12.64   
                            
Canceled
  (76,750)  13.09    (84,650)  13.46   (98,170)  13.08   
                            
                            
Outstanding and exercisable at end of year
  362,050  $14.49    453,050  $14.20   537,700  $14.08   
                            
 
                       
  Options Outstanding      
    Weighted-
   Options Exercisable  
    Average
 Weighted-
   Weighted-
  
    Remaining
 Average
   Average
  
Non-Qualified Options Shares Contractual Life Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price  
 
$10.78 to $12.41
  36,250   3.0  $11.24   36,250  $11.24   
                       
12.95 to 14.44
  132,700   1.9   13.71   132,700   13.71   
                       
15.44 to 17.16
  178,100   1.0   15.47   178,100   15.47   
                       
17.54 to 18.78
  15,000   1.3   17.54   15,000   17.54   
                       
                       
   362,050   1.5       362,050       
                       
 
All options expire on the earlier of termination or, in some instances, a defined period subsequent to termination of employment, or ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price represents the quoted market price of Glatfelter common stock on the date of grant, or the average quoted market prices of Glatfelter common stock on the first day before and after the date of grant for which quoted market price information was available if such information was not available on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2010, the intrinsic value of outstanding stock options totaled $0.04 million.
 
10.  RETIREMENT PLANS AND OTHERPOST-RETIREMENTBENEFITS
 
We provide non-contributory retirement benefits under both funded and unfunded plans to all U.S. employees and to certainnon-U.S. employees.U.S. benefits are based on either a final average pay formula or a cash balance formula for salaried employees, and on a unit-benefit formula for bargained hourly employees.Non-U.S. benefitsare based, in the case of certain plans, on average salary and years of service and, in the case of other plans, on a fixed amount for each year of service. U.S. plan provisions and funding meet the

38


Table of Contents

 
requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. We use a December 31-measurement date for all of our defined benefit plans.
 
We also provide certain health care benefits to eligibleU.S.-basedretired employees and exclude all salaried employees hired after January 1, 2008. These benefits include a comprehensive medical plan for retirees prior to age 65 and fixed supplemental premium payments to certain retirees over age 65 to help defray the costs of Medicare. The plan is partially funded and claims are paid as reported.
 
                     
  Pension Benefits Other Benefits
  In millions 2010  2009 2010  2009  
Change in Benefit Obligation
                    
Balance at beginning of year
 $406.1   $386.3   $62.6    $58.6   
Service cost
  9.5    8.6   2.9    2.6   
Interest cost
  23.9    23.4   3.4    3.5   
Plan amendments
  1.2    1.9          
Actuarial (gain)/loss
  17.9    12.9   (5.7)   1.3   
Benefits paid
  (24.3)   (27.0)  (4.7)   (3.4)  
                     
Balance at end of year
 $434.3   $406.1   $58.5    $62.6   
                     
                     
Change in Plan Assets
                    
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
 $485.7   $400.6   $6.3    $5.7   
Actual return on plan assets
  63.2    110.0   0.9    1.6   
Employer contributions
  1.8    2.1   3.7    2.4   
Benefits paid
  (24.3)   (27.0)  (4.7)   (3.4)  
                     
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
  526.4    485.7   6.2    6.3   
                     
Funded status at end of year
 $92.1   $79.6   $(52.3)   $(56.3)  
                     
 
The net prepaid pension cost for qualified pension plans is primarily included in “Other long-term assets,” and the accrued pension cost for non-qualified pension plans and accrued post-retirement benefit costs are primarily included in “Other long-term liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
 
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of the following as of December 31:
 
                     
  Pension Benefits Other Benefits  
  In millions 2010  2009 2010  2009  
Other long-term assets
 $129.2   $112.9  $   $   
Current liabilities
  (8.6)   (1.8)  (3.9)   (4.6)  
Other long-term liabilities
  (28.5)   (31.5)  (48.4)   (51.7)  
                     
Net amount recognized
 $92.1   $79.6  $(52.3)  $(56.3)  
                     
 
The components of amounts recognized as “Accumulated other comprehensive income” consist of the following on a pre-tax basis:
 
                     
  Pension Benefits Other Benefits  
  In millions 2010  2009 2010  2009  
Prior service cost/(credit)
 $15.5   $16.5   $(4.2)   $(5.3)  
Net actuarial loss
  170.8    189.2   14.1    21.5   
                     
 
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $417.1 million and $390.9 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing the benefit obligations above were as follows:
 
                     
  Pension Benefits Other Benefits  
   2010  2009 2010  2009  
Discount rate – benefit obligation
  5.80%   6.10%  5.10%   5.90%  
Future compensation growth rate
  4.0    4.0          
                     
 
The discount rates set forth above were estimated based on the modeling of expected cash flows for each of our benefit plans and selecting a portfolio of high-quality debt instruments with maturities matching the respective cash flows of each plan. The resulting discount rates ranged from 5.00% to 6.10% for the pension plans and for other benefit plans ranged from 4.65% to 5.20%.
 
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets was as follows:
 
            
  In millions 2010  2009  
Projected benefit obligation
 $37.1    $33.3   
Accumulated benefit obligation
  32.0    29.2   
Fair value of plan assets
         
            
 
Net periodic benefit cost (income) includes the following components:
 
                
  Year Ended December 31  
  In millions 2010  2009 2008  
Pension Benefits
               
Service cost
 $9.5   $8.6  $8.3   
Interest cost
  23.9    23.4   23.1   
Expected return on plan assets
  (40.3)   (39.8)  (50.1)  
Amortization of prior service cost
  2.5    2.2   2.3   
Amortization of actuarial loss
  13.6    12.6   0.3   
                
Total net periodic benefit cost (income)
 $9.2   $7.0  $(16.1)  
                
                
Other Benefits
               
Service cost
 $2.9   $2.6  $2.1   
Interest cost
  3.4    3.5   3.2   
Expected return on plan assets
  (0.5)   (0.5)  (0.8)  
Amortization of prior service cost/(credit)
  (1.2)   (1.2)  (1.3)  
Amortization of actuarial loss
  1.5    2.1   1.3   
                
Total net periodic benefit cost
 $6.1   $6.5  $4.5   
                
 
The actuarial net (gain) loss and prior service cost for our defined benefit pension plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are $14.1 million and $2.4 million, respectively. The comparable amounts of expected amortization for other benefit plans are $1.1 million and a credit of $(1.2) million, respectively.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    39


Table of Contents

 
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
 
            
  Year Ended December 31  
  In millions 2010  2009  
Pension Benefits
           
Actuarial (gain) loss
 $(4.5)  $(57.7)  
Prior service cost
  1.2    1.9   
Amortization of prior service cost
  (2.5)   (2.2)  
Amortization of actuarial losses
  (13.6)   (12.6)  
            
Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss
  (19.4)   (70.6)  
            
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income (loss)
 $(10.2)  $(63.6)  
            
            
Other Benefits
           
Actuarial (gain) loss
 $(6.0)  $0.2   
Amortization of prior service cost
  1.2    1.2   
Amortization of actuarial losses
  (1.5)   (2.1)  
            
Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss
  (6.3)   (0.7)  
            
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive loss
 $(0.2)  $5.8   
            
 
The weighted-average assumptions used in computing the net periodic benefit (income) cost information above were as follows:
 
                
  Year Ended December 31  
  In millions 2010  2009 2008  
Pension Benefits
               
Discount rate – benefit expense
  6.10%   6.25%  6.25%  
Future compensation growth rate
  4.0    4.0   4.0   
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
  8.5    8.5   8.5   
Other Benefits
               
Discount rate – benefit expense
  5.90    6.25%  6.25%  
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
  8.5    8.5   8.5   
                
 
To develop the expected long-term rate of return assumption, we considered the historical returns and the future expected returns for each asset class, as well as the target asset allocation of the pension portfolio.
 
Assumed health care cost trend rates used to determine benefit obligations at December 31 were as follows:
 
            
  2010  2009  
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
  8.10%   8.75%  
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)
  4.5    4.5   
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate rate
  2021    2021   
            
 
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for health care plans. A one percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
 
           
  One Percentage Point  
  In millions increase decrease  
Effect on:
          
Post-retirement benefit obligation
 $3.9  $(3.5)  
Total of service and interest cost components
  0.5   (0.5)  
           
 
Plan Assets  All pension plan assets in the U.S. are invested through a single master trust fund. The strategic asset allocation for this trust fund is selected by management, reflecting the results of comprehensive asset liability modeling. The general principles guiding U.S. pension asset investment policies are those embodied in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). These principles include discharging our investment responsibilities for the exclusive benefit of plan participants and in accordance with the “prudent expert” standard and other ERISA rules and regulations. We establish strategic asset allocation percentage targets and appropriate benchmarks for significant asset classes with the aim of achieving a prudent balance between return and risk.
 
Investments and decisions will be made solely in the interest of the Plan’s participants and beneficiaries, and for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits accrued thereunder. The primary goal of the Plan is to ensure the solvency of the Plan over time and thereby meet its distribution objectives. Plan assets will be diversified. All investments in the Plan will be made in accordance with ERISA and other applicable statutes.
 
Risk is minimized by diversification by asset class by style of each manager and by sector and industry limits when applicable. The target allocation for the Plan assets are:
 
       
      
Domestic Equity –
      
Large cap
  39%  
Small and mid cap
  13   
International equity
  13   
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REIT)
  5   
Fixed income , cash and cash equivalents
  30   
       
 
Diversification is achieved by:
 
  i. placing restrictions on the percentage of equity investments in any one company, percentage of investment in any one industry, limiting the amount of assets placed with any one manager; and
 
  ii. setting targets for duration of fixed income securities, maintaining a certain level of credit quality, and limiting the amount of investment in non-investment grade paper.
 
A formal asset allocation review is done periodically to ensure that the Plan has an appropriate asset allocation based on the Plan’s projected benefit obligations. The target return for each equity and fixed income manager will be one that places the manager’s performance in the top 40% of its peers and on a gross basis, exceeds that of the manager’s respective benchmark index. The target return for cash and cash equivalents is a return that at least equals that of the90-dayT-bills.
 
The Investment Policy statement lists specific categories of securities or activities that are prohibited including options, futures, commodities, hedge funds, limited partnerships, and our stock.

40


Table of Contents

 
The table below presents the fair values of our benefit plan assets by level within the fair value hierarchy, as described in Note 2:
 
                       
   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010  
  in millions  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  
Domestic Equity
                      
Large cap
  $185.8   $185.8   $    $–   
Small and mid cap
   67.5    67.5           
International equity
   93.7    57.8    35.9       
REIT
   24.1    24.1           
Fixed income
   147.4    59.5    87.9       
Cash and equivalents
   14.1    0.2    13.9       
                       
Total
  $532.6   $394.9   $137.7    $–   
                       
 
                       
   Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009  
  in millions  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  
Domestic Equity
                      
Large cap
  $176.0   $175.6   $0.4    $–   
Small and mid cap
   77.6    77.6           
International equity
   64.2    33.1    31.1       
REIT
   25.7    25.7           
Fixed income
   134.5    71.0    63.5       
Cash and equivalents
   14.0    14.0           
                       
Total
  $492.0   $397.0   $95.0    $–   
                       
 
Cash Flow  We did not make contributions to our qualified pension plans in 2010. Benefit payments expected to be made in 2011 under our non-qualified pension plans and other benefit plans are summarized below:
 
         
  In thousands      
Nonqualified pension plans
  $8,573    
         
Other benefit plans
   4,917    
         
 
The following benefit payments under all pension and other benefit plans, and giving effect to expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
 
              
  In thousands Pension Benefits  Other Benefits  
2011
 $37,148   $4,917     
              
2012
  30,119    4,971     
              
2013
  30,459    4,986     
              
2014
  30,927    5,382     
              
2015
  31,522    5,500     
              
2016 through 2020
  162,117    30,339     
              
 
Defined Contribution Plans  We maintain 401(k) plans for certain hourly and salaried employees. Employees may contribute up to 15% of their salary to these plans, subject to certain restrictions. We will match a portion of the employee’s contribution, subject to certain limitations, in the form of shares of Glatfelter common stock. The expense associated with our 401(k) match was $1.0 million, $0.9 million and $0.9 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
11.  INVENTORIES
 
Inventories, net of reserves were as follows:
 
               
  In thousands  2010  2009  
Raw materials
  $52,538   $44,150     
               
In-process and finished
   94,118    78,340     
               
Supplies
   54,421    45,880     
               
               
Total
  $201,077   $168,370     
               
 
We value all of our U.S. inventories on the LIFO method. If we had valued these inventories using thefirst-in,first-out method, inventories would have been $20.2 million and $16.9 million higher than reported at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. During 2010 and 2009, we liquidated certain LIFO inventories, the effect of which did not have a significant impact on results of operations.
 
12.  PLANT, EQUIPMENT AND TIMBERLANDS
 
Plant, equipment and timberlands at December 31 were as follows:
 
               
  In thousands  2010  2009  
Land and buildings
  $185,469   $136,260     
               
Machinery and equipment
   1,080,065    970,708     
               
Furniture, fixtures, and other
   109,168    101,327     
               
Accumulated depreciation
   (807,441)   (773,057)    
               
               
    567,261    435,238     
               
Construction in progress
   30,904    23,947     
               
Asset retirement – Lagoons
   8,829    10,300     
               
Timberlands, less depletion
   1,176    1,147     
               
               
Total
  $608,170   $470,632     
               
 
13.  GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
 
The following table sets forth information with respect to goodwill and other intangible assets which are recorded in the caption “Other long-term assets” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets:
 
             
   December 31  
  In thousands  2010  2009  
 
Goodwill – Composite Fibers
  $16,483   $17,331   
             
             
Specialty Papers
            
             
Customer relationships
  $6,155   $6,155   
             
Composite Fibers
            
             
Technology and related
   4,194    4,373   
             
Customer relationships and related
   1,799    1,867   
             
Advanced Airlaid Materials
            
             
Technology and related
   1,594       
             
Customer relationships and related
   3,350       
             
             
Total intangibles
   17,092    12,395   
             
Accumulated amortization
   (5,245)   (3,525)  
             
             
Net intangibles
  $11,847   $8,870   
             
 
The decrease in goodwill was due to foreign currency translation adjustments. Other thannon-amortizablegoodwill, intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis. Customer relationships are amortized

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    41


Table of Contents

 
over periods ranging from 3 years to 14 years and technology and related intangible assets are amortized over period ranging from 14 years to 20 years. The following table sets forth information pertaining to amortization of intangible assets:
 
             
  In thousands  2010  2009  
 
Aggregate amortization expense:
  $1,763   $981   
             
Estimated amortization expense:
            
             
2011
  $1,811        
             
2012
   1,770        
             
2013
   1,317        
             
2014
   1,317        
             
2015
   1,317        
             
 
The remaining weighted average useful life of intangible assets was 10 years at December 31, 2010.
 
14.  OTHER LONG-TERM ASSETS
 
Other long-term assets consist of the following:
 
             
   December 31  
  In thousands  2010  2009  
 
Pension
  $129,207   $112,903   
             
Installment note receivable
   43,183    43,183   
             
Goodwill and intangibles
   28,330    26,201   
             
Other
   30,167    17,319   
             
             
Total
  $230,887   $199,606   
             
 
15.  OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
Other current liabilities consist of the following:
 
             
   December 31  
  In thousands  2010  2009  
 
Accrued payroll and benefits
  $47,205   $46,141   
             
Other accrued compensation and retirement benefits
   13,491    6,476   
             
Income taxes payable
   2,192    4,684   
             
Accrued rebates
   16,086    14,195   
             
Other accrued expenses
   30,342    28,753   
             
             
Total
  $109,316   $100,249   
             
 
16.  LONG-TERM DEBT
 
Long-term debt is summarized as follows:
 
             
   December 31  
  In thousands  2010  2009  
 
Revolving credit facility, due April 2011
   n/a   $   
             
Revolving credit facility, due May 2014
  $    n/a   
             
Term Loan, due April 2011
       14,000   
             
71/8% Notes, due May 2016
   200,000    200,000   
             
71/8% Notes, due May 2016 – net of original issue discount
   95,529       
             
Term Loan, due January 2013
   36,695    36,695   
             
             
Total long-term debt
   332,224    250,695   
             
Less current portion
       (13,759)  
             
             
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
  $332,224   $236,936   
             
 
On April 29, 2010, we entered into a new four-year, $225 million, multi-currency, revolving credit agreement with a consortium of banks. The new agreement matures May 31, 2014 and replaced and terminated our old revolving credit agreement which was due to mature April 2011.
 
For all US dollar denominated borrowings under the new agreement, the interest rate is either, at our option, (a) the bank’s base rate plus an applicable margin (the base rate is the greater of the bank’s prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points, or the daily LIBOR rate plus 100 basis points); or (b) daily LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 175 basis points to 275 basis points according to our corporate credit rating determined by S&P and Moody’s. For non-US dollar denominated borrowings, interest is based on (b) above.
 
The credit agreement contains a number of customary covenants for financings of this type that, among other things, restrict our ability to dispose of or create liens on assets, incur additional indebtedness, repay other indebtedness, limits certain intercompany financing arrangements, make acquisitions and engage in mergers or consolidations. We are also required to comply with specified financial tests and ratios, each as defined in the credit agreement, including: i) maximum net debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) ratio; and ii) a consolidated EBITDA to interest expense ratio. A breach of these requirements would give rise to certain remedies under the credit agreement, among which are the termination of the agreement and accelerated repayment of the outstanding borrowings plus accrued and unpaid interest under the credit facility.
 
On April 28, 2006 we completed an offering of $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 71/8% Senior Notes due 2016 (“71/8% Notes”). Net proceeds from this offering totaled approximately $196.4 million, after deducting the commissions and other fees and expenses relating to the offering. The proceeds were primarily used to redeem $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of our then outstanding 67/8% notes due July 2007, plus the payment of applicable redemption premium and accrued interest.
 
On February 5, 2010, we issued an additional $100 million in aggregate principal amount of 71/8% Notes due 2016 (together with the April 28, 2006 offering, the “Senior Notes”). The notes were issued at 95.0% of the principal amount. Net proceeds from this offering after deducting offering fees and expenses, were used to fund, in part, the Concert acquisition. The original issue discount is being accreted as a charge to income on the effective interest method.
 
Interest on the Senior Notes accrues at the rate of 71/8% per annum and is payable semiannually in arrears on May 1 and November 1.

42


Table of Contents

 
The Senior Notes contain cross default provisions that could result in all such notes becoming due and payable in the event of a failure to repay debt outstanding under the credit agreement at maturity or a default under the credit agreement that accelerates the debt outstanding thereunder. As of December 31, 2010, we were not aware of any violations of our debt covenants.
 
In November 2007, we sold approximately 26,000 acres of timberland. In connection with that transaction, we formed GPW Virginia Timberlands LLC (“GPW Virginia”) as an indirect, wholly owned and bankruptcy-remote subsidiary of ours. GPW Virginia received as consideration for the timberland sold in that transaction a $43.2 million, interest-bearing note that matures in 2027 from the buyer, Glawson Investments Corp. (“Glawson”), a Georgia corporation, and GIC Investments LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by Glawson. The Glawson note receivable is fully secured by a letter of credit issued by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc. In January 2008, GPW Virginia monetized the Glawson note receivable by entering into a $36.7 million term loan agreement (the “2008 Term Loan”) with a financial institution. The 2008 Term Loan is secured by all of the assets of GPW Virginia, including the Glawson note receivable, the related letter of credit and additional notes with an aggregate principal amount of $9.2 million that we issued in favor of GPW Virginia (the “Company Note”). The 2008 Term Loan bears interest at a six month reserve adjusted LIBOR rate plus a margin rate of 1.20% per annum. Interest on the 2008 Term Loan is payable semiannually. The principal amount of the 2008 Term Loan is due on January 15, 2013, but GPW Virginia may prepay the 2008 Term Loan at any time, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. During the year ended December 31, 2010, GPW Virginia received aggregate interest income of $1.0 million under the Glawson note receivable and the Company Note and, in turn, incurred interest expense of $0.7 million under the 2008 Term Loan.
 
Under terms of the above transaction, minimum credit ratings must be maintained by the letter of credit issuing bank. An “event of default” is deemed to have occurred under the debt instrument governing the Note Payable unless actions are taken to cure such default within 60 days from the date such credit rating falls below the specified minimum. Potential remedial actions include: (i) amending the terms of the applicable debt instrument; (ii) a replacement of the letter of credit with an appropriately rated institution; or (iii) repaying the Note Payable.
 
The following schedule sets forth the maturity of our long-term debt during the indicated year:
 
       
  In thousands    
 
2011
  $–   
2012
     
2013
  36,695   
2014
     
2015
     
Thereafter
  300,000   
 
 
 
P. H. Glatfelter Company guarantees all debt obligations of its subsidiaries. All such obligations are recorded in these consolidated financial statements.
 
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $5.4 million and $5.7 million, respectively, of letters of credit issued to us by certain financial institutions. Such letters of credit reduce amounts available under our revolving credit facility. The letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2010, primarily provide financial assurances for the benefit of certain state workers compensation insurance agencies in conjunction with our self-insurance program. We bear the credit risk on this amount to the extent that we do not comply with the provisions of certain agreements. No amounts are outstanding under the letters of credit.
 
17.  ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION
 
During 2008, we recorded $11.5 million, net present value, of asset retirement obligations related to the legal requirement to close several lagoons at the Spring Grove, PA facility. Historically, lagoons were used to dispose of residual waste material. Closure of the lagoons, which is expected to occur over the next six years, will be accomplished by filling the lagoons, installing a non-permeable liner which will be covered with soil to construct the required cap over the lagoons. The amount referred to above, in addition to the upward revision in 2009, was accrued with a corresponding increase in the carrying value of the property, equipment and timberlands caption on the consolidated balance sheet. The amount capitalized is being amortized as a charge to operations on the straight-line basis in relation to the expected closure period. Following is a summary of the reserve for asset retirement obligations for the periods indicated:
 
             
  In thousands  2010  2009  
 
             
Beginning balance
  $(11,292)  $(11,606)  
             
Upward revision
       (600)  
             
Payments
   2,179    1,535   
             
Accretion
   (604)   (621)  
             
             
Ending balance
  $(9,717)  $(11,292)  
             
 
Of the total liability at the end of 2010, $1.5 million is recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under the caption “Other current liabilities” and $8.2 million is recorded under the caption “Other long-term liabilities.” The comparable amounts as of December 31, 2009 were $2.4 million and $8.9 million, respectively.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    43


Table of Contents

 
18.  FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES
 
The amounts reported on the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and short-term debt approximate fair value. The following table sets forth carrying value and fair value of long-term debt:
 
                    
  December 31, 2010  December 31, 2009  
  Carrying
 Fair
  Carrying
 Fair
  
  In thousands Value Value  Value Value  
Fixed-rate Bonds
 $295,529  $304,115    $200,000   $196,750   
Variable rate debt
  36,695   37,780    50,695   51,209   
                    
Total
 $332,224  $341,895    $250,695   $247,959   
                    
 
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had $300.0 million and $200.0 million, respectively, of 71/8% fixed rate debt. The amount outstanding as of the end of 2010 includes $100.0 million that is recorded net of unamortized original issue discount. All of this fixed rate debt is publicly registered, but is thinly traded. Accordingly, the values set forth above are based on debt instruments with similar characteristics, or Level 2. The fair value of the remaining debt instrument was estimated using a discounted cash flow model based on independent sources, or Level 3.
 
As part of our overall risk management practices, we enter into foreign exchange forward contracts primarily designed to mitigate the impact that changes in currency exchange rates have on intercompany financing transactions and to hedge exposure to certain foreign currency denominated receivables and payables. None of these contracts are designated as hedges for financial accounting purposes and, accordingly, changes in value of the foreign exchange forward contract and the offsetting underlying intercompany transactions are reflected in the accompanying statement of operations under the caption “Other – net.” For the year ended December 31, 2010, our results of operations included a $0.4 million net loss from forward foreign currency exchange contracts. This activity was substantially all offset by adjustments to translate the underlying intercompany financing transactions.
 
The fair values of the foreign exchange forward contracts are considered to be Level 2. The following table sets forth the notional values of outstanding foreign exchange forward contracts together with the unrealized fair value as of December 31, 2010:
 
         
  Notional
    
  Amount
 Fair Value
 Balance Sheet
December 31, 2010 (millions) (thousands) Location
 
 
         
Sell euro for US$
 €57.0 $(563.0) Other current liabilities
         
Buy euro for British pound
 €3.0  (14.0) Other current liabilities
         
Sell Philippine peso for US$
 PHP 247.0  (4.0) Other current liabilities
 
 
 
 
Each of the contracts set forth above have a maturity of one month from the date the respective contract was entered into.
 
We are exposed to credit risk related to this activity arising in the event of the inability of a counterparty to meet its obligations to us under the terms of these contracts. This exposure is generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which the counterparty’s obligations exceed our obligation to them. Our policy is to enter into such financial instruments with financial institutions which meet certain minimum debt ratings.
 
19.  SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
The following table summarizes outstanding shares of common stock:
 
                 
   Year Ended December 31,
  In thousands  2010  2009 2008  
Shares outstanding at beginning of year
   45,706    45,434   45,143   
Treasury shares issued for:
                
Restricted stock awards
   112    86   94   
401(k) plan
   132    169   119   
Director compensation
   12    17   14   
Employee stock options exercised
   14       64   
                 
Shares outstanding at end of year
   45,976    45,706   45,434   
                 
 
20.  COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
Contractual Commitments  The following table summarizes the minimum annual payments due on noncancelable operating leases and other similar contractual obligations having initial or remaining terms in excess of one year:
 
             
  In thousands  Leases  Other  
 
             
2011
  $7,975   $87,946   
             
2012
   4,629    52,817   
             
2013
   3,207    30,474   
             
2014
   1,676    2,777   
             
2015
   1,332    2,602   
             
Thereafter
   7,171    9,149   
             
 
Other contractual obligations primarily represent minimum purchase commitments under energy and pulp wood supply contracts and other purchase obligations.
 
At December 31, 2010, required minimum annual payments due under operating leases and other similar contractual obligations aggregated $26.0 million and $185.8 million, respectively.
 
Fox River – Neenah, Wisconsin
 
Background  We have significant uncertainties associated with environmental claims arising out of the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) in sediments in the lower Fox River and in the Bay of Green Bay Wisconsin (“Site”). As part of our 1979 acquisition of the Bergstrom Paper Company, we acquired a facility

44


Table of Contents

 
located at the Site (the “Neenah Facility”). The Neenah Facility used wastepaper as a source of fiber. Discharges to the lower Fox River from the Neenah Facility that may have contained PCBs from wastepaper may have occurred from 1954 to the late 1970s. We believe that any PCBs that the Neenah Facility may have discharged into the lower Fox River resulted from the presence of PCBs in NCR®-brand carbonless copy paper in the wastepaper that was recycled at the Neenah Facility. We closed the Neenah Facility in June 2006.
 
The United States, the State of Wisconsin and various state and federal governmental agencies (collectively, the “Governments”), as well as other entities (including local Native American tribes), have found PCBs in sediments in the bed of the Fox River, apparently from a number of sources at municipal and industrial facilities along the upstream and downstream portions of the Site. The Governments have identified manufacturing and recycling of NCR®-brand carbonless copy paper as the principal source of that contamination.
 
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has divided the lower Fox River and the Bay of Green Bay site into five “operable units” (the “OUs”), including the most upstream (“OU1”) and four downstream reaches of the river and bay (“OU2-5”). OU1 extends from primarily Lake Winnebago to the dam at Appleton, and is comprised of Little Lake Butte des Morts. The Neenah Facility discharged its wastewater into OU1.
 
Our liabilities, if any, for this contamination primarily arise under the federal Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA” or “Superfund”), pursuant to which the Governments have sought to recover “response actions” or “response costs,” which are the costs of studying and cleaning up contamination. Other agencies and natural resource trustee agencies (collectively, the “Trustees”) have sought to recover natural resource damages (“NRDs”), including natural resource damage assessment costs.
 
We are one of eight entities that have been formally notified that they are potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”) under CERCLA for response costs or NRDs. Others, including the United States and the State of Wisconsin, may also be liable for some or all of the costs of NRD at this Site.
 
The Governments have sought to recover response actions, response costs, and NRDs from us through three principal enforcement actions.
 
OU1 CD.  On October 1, 2003, the United States and the State of Wisconsin commenced an action captioned United States v. P.H. Glatfelter Co.against us and WTM I Co. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin and simultaneously lodged a consent decree (“OU1 CD”) that the court entered on April 12, 2004. Under that OU1 CD, and an amendment dated August 2008, we and WTM I, with a limited fixed contribution from Menasha Corp. and funds provided by the United States from an agreement with others, have implemented the remedy for OU1. We have also resolved claims for all Governmental response costs in OU1 after July 2003 and made a payment on NRDs. That remedy is complete. We have continuing operation and maintenance obligations that we expect to fund from contributions we and WTM I have already made to an escrow account for OU1 under the OU1 CD.
 
OU2-5 UAO.  In November 2007, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) issued an administrative order for remedial action (“UAO”) to Appleton Papers Inc. (“API”), CBC Coating, Inc. (formerly known as Riverside Paper Corporation), Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, L.P. (formerly known as Fort James Operating Company), Menasha Corporation, NCR Corporation, Glatfelter, U.S. Paper Mills Corp., and WTM I Company (“WTM”) directing those respondents to implement the remedy in OU2-5. Shortly following issuance of the UAO, API and NCR commenced litigation against us and others, as described below. Accordingly, we have no vehicle for complying with the UAO’s overall requirements other than answering a judgment in the litigation, and we have so informed EPA, but, to minimize disruptions, have paid certain de minimis amounts to EPA for oversight costs under the UAO.
 
Government Action.  On October 14, 2010, the United States and the State of Wisconsin filed an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin captioned United States v. NCR Corp. (the “Government Action”) against 12 parties, including us. The Government Action seeks to recover from each of the defendants, jointly and severally, all of the governments’ past costs of response, which amount to in excess of $16.5 million to date, a declaration as to liability for all of the governments’ future costs of response, and compensation for natural resource damages, as well as a declaration as to liability for compliance with the UAO for OU2-5.
 
We are engaged in litigation to allocate costs and NRDs among the parties responsible for this site.
 
Whiting Litigation.  On January 7, 2008, NCR and API commenced litigation in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin captionedAppleton Papers Inc. v. George A. Whiting Paper Co., seeking to reallocate costs and damages allegedly incurred or paid or to be incurred or paid by NCR or API (the “Whiting Litigation”). At present, the case involves allocation claims among the two plaintiffs and 28

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    45


Table of Contents

 
defendants including us. We and other defendants counterclaimed against NCR and API.
 
Claims against governments.  The Whiting Litigation involves claims by certain parties against federal agencies who are responsible parties for this site. In the Government Action many defendants, including us, asserted counterclaims against the United States and the State of Wisconsin.
 
Settlements.  Certain parties have resolved their liability to the United States affording them contribution protection. These settlements are embodied in consent decrees. Notably, we entered into the OU1 CD. Also, in a case captioned United States v. George A. Whiting Paper Co., the district court entered two consent decrees under which 13 de minimis defendants in the Whiting Litigation settled with the United States and Wisconsin. NCR and API appealed and await disposition by the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Further, Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP, has entered into a consent decree resolving its liability for NRDs and on October 14, 2010, lodged a consent decree in the Government Action that would resolve all of its liabilities except for the downstream portion of the OU4 remedy. The court has not yet entered that consent decree. Finally, the United States has lodged a consent decree that would resolve the liability of itself and two municipalities. We oppose entry of that consent decree.
 
Cleanup Decisions.  The extent of our exposure depends, in large part, on the decisions made by EPA and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (“WDNR”) as to how the Site will be cleaned up and the costs and timing of those response actions. The nature of the response actions has been highly controversial. Between 2002 and 2008, the EPA issued records of decision (“RODs”) regarding required remedial actions for the OUs. Some of those RODs have been amended We contend that the remedy for OU2-5 is arbitrary and capricious. We and others may litigate that issue in the Government Action. If we were to be successful in modifying any existing selected remedy, our exposure could be reduced materially.
 
NRD Assessment.  We are engaged in disputes as to (i) whether various documents prepared by the Trustees taken together constitute a sufficient NRD assessment under applicable regulations, and (ii) on a number of legal grounds, whether the Trustees may recover from us on the specific NRD claims they have made.
 
Past Cost Demand.  We are also disputing a demand by EPA that we and six other parties reimburse EPA for approximately $17.6 million in costs that EPA claims it incurred.
 
Cost estimates.  Estimates of the Site remediation change over time as we, or others, gain additional data and experience at the Site. In addition, disagreement exists over the likely costs for some of this work. Based upon estimates made by the Governments and independent estimates commissioned by various potentially responsible parties, we have no reason to disagree with the Governments’ assertion that total past and future costs and NRDs at this site may exceed $1 billion and that $1.5 billion is a reasonable “outside estimate.”
 
NRDs.  Of that amount, the Trustees’ assessment documents claimed that we are jointly and severally responsible for NRDs with a value between $176 million and $333 million. They now claim that this range should be inflated to 2009 dollars and then certain unreimbursed past assessment costs should be added, so that the range of their claim would be $287 million to $423 million. We deny liability for most of these NRDs and believe that even if anyone is liable, that we are not jointly and severally liable for the full amount. Moreover, we believe that the Trustees may not legally pursue this claim at this late date, as the limitations period for NRD claims is three years from discovery.
 
Allocation and Divisibility.  We contend that we are not jointly and severally liable for costs or damages arising from the presence of PCBs downstream of OU1. In addition, we contend that NCR or other sources of NCR®-brand carbonless copy paper that our Neenah Mill recycled bear most, if not all, of the responsibility for costs and damages arising from the presence of PCBs in OU1 and downstream.
 
On December 16, 2009, the court granted motions for summary judgment in our favor in the Whiting Litigation holding that neither NCR nor API may seek contribution from us or other recyclers under CERCLA. The Court made no ruling as to any other allocation, the liability of NCR or API to us for costs we have incurred, or our liability to the Governments or Trustees. NCR and API have stated their intention to appeal, but an appeal is not yet timely because the court has not entered a final judgment.
 
We also filed counterclaims against NCR and API to recover the costs we have incurred and may later incur and the damages we have paid and may later pay in connection with the Site. Other defendants have similar claims. On March 1, 2011, the district court granted our summary judgment motions on those counterclaims in part and denied them in part. While we are still evaluating the court’s opinion, the court granted a declaration that NCR and API are liable to us (and to others) in contribution for 100% of any costs of response (that is, clean up) that we may be required to pay for work in OU2-5 in the future. The court requires further

46


Table of Contents

 
proceedings to decide whether or to what extent NCR and API owe contribution to us and others for costs that we and others incurred in the past and costs that we and others incurred in connection with OU1. We are uncertain as to the court’s ruling with respect to our claim that NCR and API owe contribution to us (and others) for NRDs or natural resource damage assessment costs that we have paid or may be required to pay in the future.
 
Reserves for the Site.  As of December 31, 2010, our reserve for our claimed liability at the Site, including our remediation and ongoing monitoring obligations at OU1, our claimed liability for the remediation of the rest of the Site, our claimed liability for NRDs associated with PCB contamination at the Site and all pending, threatened or asserted and unasserted claims against us relating to PCB contamination at the Site totaled $17.0 million. No additional amounts were accrued during the three year period ended December 31, 2010. Of our total reserve for the Fox River, $0.2 million is recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets under the caption “Environmental liabilities” and the remainder is recorded under the caption “Other long term liabilities.”
 
Although we believe that amounts already funded by us and WTM to implement the OU1 remedy are adequate and no payments have been required since January 2009, there can be no assurance that these amounts will in fact suffice. WTM has filed a bankruptcy petition in the Bankruptcy Court in Richmond; accordingly, there can be no assurance that WTM will be able to fulfill its obligation to pay half of any additional costs, if required.
 
We believe that we have strong defenses to liability for further remediation downstream of OU1, including the existence of ample data that indicate that PCBs did not leave OU1 in concentrations that could have caused or contributed to the need for additional cleanup downstream. Others, including the EPA and other PRPs, disagree with us and, as a result, the EPA has issued a UAO to us and to others to perform the additional remedial work, and filed the Government Action seeking, in part, the same relief. NCR and API commenced the Whiting Litigation and joined us and others as defendants, but, to this point, have not prevailed.
 
Even if we are not successful in establishing that we have no further remediation liability, we do not believe that we would be allocated a significant percentage share of liability in any equitable allocation of the remediation costs and natural resource damages. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include reserves for defense costs for the Whiting Litigation, the Government Action, or any future defense costs related to our involvement at the Site, which could be significant.
 
In setting our reserve for the Site, we have assessed our legal defenses, including our successful defenses to the allegations made in the Whiting Litigation, and assumed that we will not bear the entire cost of remediation or damages to the exclusion of other known PRPs at the Site, who are also potentially jointly and severally liable. The existence and ability of other PRPs to participate has also been taken into account in setting our reserve, and is generally based on our evaluation of recent publicly available financial information on each PRP and any known insurance, indemnity or cost sharing agreements between PRPs and third parties. In addition, our assessment is based upon the magnitude, nature, location and circumstances associated with the various discharges of PCBs to the river and the relationship of those discharges to identified contamination. We will continue to evaluate our exposure and the level of our reserves, including, but not limited to, our potential share of the costs and NRDs, if any, associated with the Site.
 
The amount and timing of future expenditures for environmental compliance, cleanup, remediation and personal injury, NRDs and property damage liabilities cannot be ascertained with any certainty due to, among other things, the unknown extent and nature of any contamination, the response actions that may ultimately be required, the availability of remediation equipment, and landfill space, and the number and financial resources of any other PRPs.
 
Other Information.  The Governments have published studies estimating the amount of PCBs discharged by each identified PRP’s facility to the lower Fox River and Green Bay. These reports estimate the Neenah Facility’s share of the mass of PCBs discharged to be as high as 27%. We do not believe the discharge mass estimates used in these studies are accurate because (a) the studies themselves disclose that they are not accurate and (b) the PCB mass estimates contained in the studies are based on assumptions that are unsupported by existing data on the Site. We believe that the Neenah Facility’s volumetric contribution of PCB mass is significantly lower than the estimates set forth in these studies.
 
In any event, based upon the court’s December 16, 2009, and March 1, 2011, rulings in the Whiting Litigation, as well as certain other procedural orders, we continue to believe that an allocation in proportion to mass of PCBs discharged would not constitute an equitable allocation of the potential liability for the contamination at the Fox River. We contend that other factors, such as the location of contamination, the location of

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    47


Table of Contents

 
discharge, and a party’s role in causing discharge, must be considered in order for the allocation to be equitable.
 
We previously entered into interim cost-sharing agreements with six of the other PRPs, which provided for those PRPs to share certain costs relating to scientific studies of PCBs discharged at the Site (“Interim Cost Sharing Agreements”). These Interim Cost Sharing Agreements do not establish the final allocation of remediation costs incurred at the Site. Based upon our evaluation of the Court’s December 16, 2009, ruling in the Whiting Litigation as well as the volume, nature and location of the various discharges of PCBs at the Site and the relationship of those discharges to identified contamination, we believe our allocable share of liability at the Site is less than our share of costs under the Interim Cost Sharing Agreements.
 
Range of Reasonably Possible Outcomes.  Our analysis of the range of reasonably possible outcomes is derived from all available information, including but not limited to official documents such as RODs, discussions with the United States and other PRPs, as well as legal counsel and engineering consultants. Based on our analysis of the current RODs and cost estimates for work to be performed at the Site, we believe that it is reasonably possible that our costs associated with the Fox River matter may exceed our cost estimates and the aggregate amounts accrued for the Fox River matter by amounts that are insignificant or that could range up to $265 million over an undeterminable period that could range beyond 15 years. We believe that the likelihood of an outcome in the upper end of the monetary range is significantly less than other possible outcomes within the range and that the possibility of an outcome in excess of the upper end of the monetary range is remote. The two summary judgments in our favor in the Whiting Litigation, if sustained on appeal, suggest that outcomes in the upper end of the monetary range have become somewhat less probable, while increases in cost estimates for some of the work may make an outcome in the upper end of the range more likely.
 
Summary.  Our current assessment is that we will be able to manage this environmental matter without a long-term, material adverse impact on the Company. This matter could, however, at any particular time or for any particular year or years, have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidityand/orresults of operations or could result in a default under our loan covenants. Moreover, there can be no assurance that our reserves will be adequate to provide for future obligations related to this matter, that our share of costsand/ordamages will not exceed our available resources, or that such obligations will not have a long-term, material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations. Should a court grant the United States or the State of Wisconsin relief which requires us either to perform directly or to contribute significant amounts towards remedial action downstream of OU1 or to natural resource damages, those developments could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity and results of operations and might result in a default under our loan covenants.
 
Ecusta Environmental Matters  Beginning in April 2003, government authorities, including the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (“NCDENR”), initiated discussions with us and other parties regarding, among other environmental issues, certain landfill closure liabilities associated with our former Ecusta mill and its properties (the “Ecusta Property”). The discussions focused on NCDENR’s desire to establish a plan and secure financial resources to close three landfills located at the Ecusta Property and to address other environmental matters at the facility. During the third quarter of 2003, the discussions ended with NCDENR’s conclusion to hold us responsible for the closure of three landfills. Accordingly, in 2003 we established reserves totaling approximately $7.6 million representing estimated landfill closure costs. During 2009, we completed the closure of the last of those three landfills (collectively, the “Landfill Closure and Post-Closure Obligations”).
 
In September 2005, we established an additional $2.7 million reserve for potential environmental liabilities associated with the Ecusta Property relating to: (i) mercury releases from the Electro-Chemical Building; (ii) contamination in and operation of the aeration and stabilization basin (the “ASB”), which is part of the Ecusta Property’s wastewater treatment system; (iii) a previously closed ash landfill (“Brown #1 Landfill”); and (iv) contamination in the vicinity of a former caustic building.
 
On January 25, 2008, we entered into a series of agreements with, among others, Davidson River Village, LLC (“DRV”)- the current owner of the Ecusta Property pursuant to which we transferred potential liabilities for certain environmental matters at the Ecusta Property to DRV (the “DRV Transaction”). In connection with the DRV Transaction, DRV assumed, and indemnified us for, liability arising from environmental matters and conditions at the Ecusta Property with certain exceptions, including the Landfill Closure and Post-Closure Obligations and investigation and remediation (if necessary) of any pollutants that may have migrated from the Ecusta Property to the Davidson and French Broad Rivers (the “River Areas”), which liabilities were retained by us.
 

48


Table of Contents

 
21.  SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
 
The following tables set forth profitability and other information by business unit:
 
                           
  For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
       Advanced Airlaid
  Other and
     
  In millions Specialty Papers  Composite Fibers  Materials  Unallocated  Total  
 
 
                           
Net sales
 $842.6   $419.2   $193.5   $   $1,455.3   
                           
Energy and related sales, net
  10.7                10.7   
   
   
                           
Total revenue
  853.3    419.2    193.5        1,466.0   
                           
Cost of products sold
  740.2    350.5    181.7    7.4    1,279.7   
   
   
                           
Gross profit
  113.1    68.7    11.8    (7.4)   186.2   
                           
SG&A
  54.7    35.8    7.4    24.3    122.1   
                           
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
              (0.5)   (0.5)  
   
   
                           
Total operating income (loss)
  58.4    32.9    4.4    (31.2)   64.6   
                           
Non-operating income (expense)
              (31.1)   (31.1)  
   
   
                           
Income (loss) before income taxes
 $58.4   $32.9   $4.4   $(62.3)  $33.5   
   
   
                           
Supplementary Data
                          
                           
Plant, equipment and timberlands, net
 $251.3   $181.6   $175.3   $   $608.2   
                           
Capital expenditures
  24.1    8.2    4.2        36.5   
                           
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
  34.9    23.7    7.2        65.8   
 
 
 
                           
  For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
       Advanced Airlaid
  Other and
     
  In millions Specialty Papers  Composite Fibers  Materials  Unallocated  Total  
 
 
                           
Net sales
 $791.9   $392.1   $   $   $1,184.0   
                           
Energy and related sales, net
  13.3                13.3   
   
   
                           
Total revenue
  805.2    392.1            1,197.3   
                           
Cost of products sold
  693.9    334.4        (100.7)   927.6   
   
   
                           
Gross profit
  111.3    57.7        100.7    269.8   
                           
SG&A
  55.4    35.8        19.1    110.3   
                           
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
              (0.9)   (0.9)  
   
   
                           
Total operating income (loss)
  55.9    21.9        82.6    160.4   
                           
Non-operating income (expense)
              (17.3)   (17.3)  
   
   
                           
Income (loss) before income taxes
 $55.9   $21.9   $   $65.3   $143.1   
   
   
                           
Supplementary Data
                          
                           
Plant, equipment and timberlands, net
 $262.8   $207.8   $   $   $470.6   
                           
Capital expenditures
  14.2    12.1            26.3   
                           
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
  37.5    23.7            61.3   
 
 
 
                           
  For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
       Advanced Airlaid
  Other and
     
  In millions Specialty Papers  Composite Fibers  Materials  Unallocated  Total  
 
 
                           
Net sales
 $833.9   $430.0   $   $   $1,263.9   
                           
Energy and related sales, net
  9.4                9.4   
   
   
                           
Total revenue
  843.3    430.0            1,273.2   
                           
Cost of products sold
  739.5    366.8        (10.8)   1,095.4   
   
   
                           
Gross profit
  103.8    63.2        10.8    177.8   
                           
SG&A
  54.6    38.2        5.1    97.9   
                           
Reversal of shutdown and restructuring charges
               (0.9)   (0.9)  
                           
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
              (18.5)   (18.5)  
   
   
                           
Total operating income (loss)
  49.2    25.0        25.1    99.2   
                           
Non-operating income (expense)
              (18.2)   (18.2)  
   
   
                           
Income (loss) before income taxes
 $49.2   $25.0   $-   $6.9   $81.0   
   
   
                           
Supplementary Data
                          
                           
Plant, equipment and timberlands, net
 $284.7   $208.9   $   $   $493.6   
                           
Capital expenditures
  20.9    31.6             52.5   
                           
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
  35.0    25.6            60.6   
 
 
 
The sum of individual amounts set forth above may not agree to the consolidated financial statements included herein due to rounding.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    49


Table of Contents

 
Results of individual business units are presented based on our management accounting practices and management structure. There is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for management accounting equivalent to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; therefore, the financial results of individual business units are not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other company. The management accounting process uses assumptions and allocations to measure performance of the business units. Methodologies are refined from time to time as management accounting practices are enhanced and businesses change. The costs incurred by support areas not directly aligned with the business unit are allocated primarily based on an estimated utilization of support area services.
 
Management evaluates results of operations of the business units before pension income or expense, alternative fuel mixture credits, charges related to the Fox River environmental reserves, restructuring related charges, unusual items, certain corporate level costs, and the effects of asset dispositions. Management believes that this is a more meaningful representation of the operating performance of its core papermaking businesses, the profitability of business units and the extent of cash flow generated from these core operations. Such amounts are presented under the caption “Other and Unallocated.” This presentation is aligned with the management and operating structure of our company. It is also on this basis that the Company’s performance is evaluated internally and by the Company’s Board of Directors.
 
Our Specialty Papers business unit focuses on producing papers for the following markets:
 
  • Carbonless & forms papers for credit card receipts, multi-part forms, security papers and other end-user applications;
 
  • Book publishing papers for the production of high quality hardbound books and other book publishing needs;
 
  • Envelope and converting papers for the direct mail market, shopping bags, and other converting applications; and
 
  • Engineered products for digital imaging, transfer, casting, release, postal, playing card, FDA-compliant food and beverage applications, and other niche specialty applications.
 
Specialty Papers’ revenue composition by market consisted of the following for the years indicated:
 
                
  In thousands 2010  2009 2008  
 
Carbonless & forms
 $359,033   $320,088  $338,067   
Book publishing
  168,155    176,646   201,040   
Envelope & converting
  157,202    146,812   138,293   
Engineered products
  155,257    143,490   149,372   
Other
  2,967    4,879   7,127   
   
   
Total
 $842,614   $791,915  $833,899   
 
 
 
Our Composite Fibers business unit serves customers globally and focuses on higher-value-added products in the following markets:
 
  • Food & Beverage paper used for tea bags and single serve coffee products;
 
  • Metallized products used in the labeling of beer bottles, innerliners, gift wrap, self-adhesive labels and other consumer products applications;
 
  • Composite Laminates papers used in production of decorative laminates, furniture and flooring applications; and
 
  • Technical Specialties is a diverse line of paper products used in batteries, medical masks and other highly engineered applications.
 
Composite Fibers’ revenue composition by market consisted of the following for the years indicated:
 
                
  In thousands 2010  2009 2008  
 
Food & beverage
 $242,882   $233,899  $252,545   
Metallized
  88,753    81,388   85,719   
Composite laminates
  50,801    46,442   58,705   
Technical specialties and other
  36,781    30,366   32,983   
   
   
Total
 $419,217   $392,095  $429,952   
 
 

50


Table of Contents

 
On February 12, 2010, we acquired Concert Industries Corp., which we now operate as the Advanced Airlaid Materialsbusiness unit. Founded in 1993 and based in Gatineau, Quebec, Canada, Concert is a leading global supplier of highly absorbent cellulose-based airlaid non-woven materials used to manufacture a diverse range of consumer and industrial products for growing global end-use markets. These products include:
 
  • feminine hygiene;
 
  • adult incontinence;
 
  • home care such as specialty wipes;
 
  • table top and towels; and
 
  • food pads and other.
 
       
  In thousands 2010  
 
 
Feminine hygiene
 $157,691   
Adult incontinence
  6,146   
Home care
  17,902   
Food pads
  8,200   
Other
  3,560   
       
  $193,499   
 
 
 
No individual customer accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated net sales in 2010, 2009 or 2008. However, one customer accounted for the majority of Advanced Airlaid Materials net sales in 2010.
 
 
Our net sales to external customers and location of net plant, equipment and timberlands are summarized below. Net sales are attributed to countries based upon origin of shipment.
                            
  2010   2009 2008  
   
    Plant,
    Plant,
   Plant,
  
    Equipment and
    Equipment and
   Equipment and
  
  In thousands Net sales Timberlands – Net  Net sales Timberlands – Net Net sales Timberlands – Net  
 
                            
United States
 $880,089  $251,318   $824,833  $262,807  $869,325  $284,689   
                            
Germany
  327,952   198,585    191,660   124,881   216,011   131,304   
                            
United Kingdom
  128,598   55,672    125,047   60,104   134,212   53,054   
                            
Canada
  75,195   80,177                
                            
Other
  43,497   22,418    42,470   22,840   44,302   24,517   
   
   
                            
Total
 $1,455,331  $608,170   $1,184,010  $470,632  $1,263,850  $493,564   
 
 
 

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    51


Table of Contents

 
22.  GUARANTOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Our Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by certain of our 100%-owned domestic subsidiaries, PHG Tea Leaves, Inc., Mollanvick, Inc., The Glatfelter Pulp Wood Company, and Glatfelter Holdings, LLC.
 
The following presents our consolidating statements of income and cash flow for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and our consolidating balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009. These financial statements reflect P. H. Glatfelter Company (the parent), the guarantor subsidiaries (on a combined basis), the non-guarantor subsidiaries (on a combined basis) and elimination entries necessary to combine such entities on a consolidated basis. We have reclassified certain interest income amounts in 2008 of $4.9 million in total from Other – net, to Interest Expense, net, to conform to the 2010 and 2009 presentation. This reclassification had no effect on the reported amounts of Interest Income, Interest Expense, or Other – net for any period presented in our accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 2010
 
                       
  Parent
   Non
 Adjustments/
    
  In thousands Company Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated  
 
 
Net sales
  $842,615   $49,919   $612,716   $(49,919)  $1,455,331   
Energy and related sales, net
  10,653            10,653   
   
   
Total revenues
  853,268   49,919   612,716   (49,919)  1,465,984   
Costs of products sold
  753,562   43,468   532,454   (49,747)  1,279,737   
   
   
Gross profit
  99,706   6,451   80,262   (172)  186,247   
Selling, general and administrative expenses
  73,802   2,287   46,022      122,111   
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
  (123)  (373)  43      (453)  
   
   
Operating income
  26,027   4,537   34,197   (172)  64,589   
Other non-operating income (expense)
                      
Interest expense, net
  (24,963)  7,445   (5,906)  (1,315)  (24,739)  
Other – net
  24,428   (1,218)  330   (29,861)  (6,321)  
   
   
Total other income (expense)
  (535)  6,227   (5,576)  (31,176)  (31,060)  
   
   
Income (loss) before income taxes
  25,492   10,764   28,621   (31,348)  33,529   
Income tax provision (benefit)
  (28,942)  2,463   6,142   (568)  (20,905)  
   
   
Net income (loss)
  $54,434   $8,301   $22,479   $(30,780)  $54,434   
   
   
 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 2009
 
                       
  Parent
   Non
 Adjustments/
    
  In thousands Company Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated  
 
 
Net sales
  $791,915   $46,796   $392,095   $(46,796)  $1,184,010   
Energy and related sales, net
  13,332            13,332   
   
   
Total revenues
  805,247   46,796   392,095   (46,796)  1,197,342   
Costs of products sold
  597,693   42,320   334,544   (46,979)  927,578   
   
   
Gross profit
  207,554   4,476   57,551   183   269,764   
Selling, general and administrative expenses
  71,484   2,304   36,469      110,257   
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
  9   (907)        (898)  
   
   
Operating income
  136,061   3,079   21,082   183   160,405   
Other non-operating income (expense)
                      
Interest expense, net
  (16,324)  5,025   (2,810)  (3,225)  (17,334)  
Other – net
  15,000   1,470   (144)  (16,251)  75   
   
   
Total other income (expense)
  (1,324)  6,495   (2,954)  (19,476)  (17,259)  
   
   
Income (loss) before income taxes
  134,737   9,574   18,128   (19,293)  143,146   
Income tax provision (benefit)
  11,295   3,382   6,171   (1,144)  19,704   
   
   
Net income (loss)
  $123,442   $6,192   $11,957   $(18,149)  $123,442   
   
   

52


Table of Contents

 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the
year ended December 31, 2008
 
                       
  Parent
   Non
 Adjustments/
    
  In thousands Company Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated  
 
 
Net sales
  $833,900   $45,640   $429,950   $(45,640)  $1,263,850   
Energy sales – net
  9,364            9,364   
   
   
Total revenues
  843,264   45,640   429,950   (45,640)  1,273,214   
Costs of products sold
  729,425   44,448   367,005   (45,446)  1,095,432   
   
   
Gross profit
  113,839   1,192   62,945   (194)  177,782   
Selling, general and administrative expenses
  56,425   1,910   39,562      97,897   
Reversal of shutdown and restructuring charges
  (856)           (856)  
Gains on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
  183   (18,651)        (18,468)  
   
   
Operating income (loss)
  58,087   17,933   23,383   (194)  99,209   
Other non-operating income (expense)
                      
Interest expense, net
  (1,293)  (12,518)  (5,810)  (23,600)  (18,185)  
Other – net
  17,729   (1,402)  (1,779)  (14,546)  2   
   
   
Total other income (expense)
  16,436   11,116   (7,589)  (38,146)  (18,183)  
   
   
Income (loss) before income taxes
  74,523   29,049   15,794   (38,340)  81,026   
Income tax provision (benefit)
  16,635   11,486   4,211   (9,194)  23,138   
   
   
Net income (loss)
  $57,888   $17,563   $11,583   $(29,146)  $57,888   
   
   
 
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010
 
                       
  Parent
   Non
 Adjustments/
    
  In thousands Company Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated  
 
 
Assets
                      
Current assets
                      
Cash and cash equivalents
  $61,953   $91   $33,744   $–   $95,788   
Other current assets
  230,957   380,986   203,048   (408,089)  406,902   
Plant, equipment and timberlands – net
  244,157   7,161   356,836   16   608,170   
Other assets
  773,254   167,877   103,250   (813,494)  230,887   
   
   
Total assets
  $1,310,321   $556,115   $696,878   $(1,221,567)  $1,341,747   
   
   
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
                      
Current liabilities
  $277,343   $3,672   $336,679   $(404,548)  $213,146   
Long-term debt
  295,529      36,695      332,224   
Deferred income taxes
  70,575   14,836   42,204   (32,697)  94,918   
Other long-term liabilities
  114,432   13,210   9,999   11,376   149,017   
   
   
Total liabilities
  757,879   31,718   425,577   (425,869)  789,305   
Shareholders’ equity
  552,442   524,397   271,301   (795,698)  552,442   
   
   
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $1,310,321   $556,115   $696,878   $(1,221,567)  $1,341,747   
   
   

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    53


Table of Contents

 
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009
 
                       
  Parent
   Non
 Adjustments/
    
  In thousands Company Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated  
 
 
Assets
                      
Current assets
                      
Cash and cash equivalents
  $76,970   $985   $57,465   $–   $135,420   
Other current assets
  275,490   260,834   148,090   (299,778)  384,636   
Plant, equipment and timberlands – net
  255,886   6,921   207,825      470,632   
Other assets
  600,116   145,304   75,731   (621,545)  199,606   
   
   
Total assets
  $1,208,462   $414,044   $489,111   $(921,323)  $1,190,294   
   
   
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
                      
Current liabilities
  $301,908   $1,357   $179,273   $(296,428)  $186,110   
Long-term debt
  200,241      36,695      236,936   
Deferred income taxes
  71,035   15,347   26,284   (15,998)  96,668   
Other long-term liabilities
  124,574   13,531   9,654   12,117   159,876   
   
   
Total liabilities
  697,758   30,235   251,906   (300,309)  679,590   
Shareholders’ equity
  510,704   383,809   237,205   (621,014)  510,704   
   
   
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $1,208,462   $414,044   $489,111   $(921,323)  $1,190,294   
   
   
 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2010
 
                       
  Parent
   Non
 Adjustments/
    
  In thousands Company Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated  
 
 
Net cash provided (used) by
                      
Operating activities
  $(6,114)  $106,448   $68,986   $(1,315)  $168,005   
Investing activities
                      
Purchase of plant, equipment and timberlands
  (23,367)  (695)  (12,429)     (36,491)  
Proceeds from disposal plant, equipment and timberlands
  124   387   53      564   
Repayments from (advances of) intercompany loans, net
  (8,257)  (105,294)  6,895   106,656      
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
        (228,290)     (228,290)  
   
   
Total investing activities
  (31,500)  (105,602)  (233,771)  106,656   (264,217)  
Financing activities
                      
Net (repayments of) proceeds from indebtedness
  75,660      (3,208)     72,452   
Payment of dividends to shareholders
  (16,746)           (16,746)  
(Repayments) borrowings of intercompany loans, net
  (40,292)  (425)  147,373   (106,656)     
Payment of intercompany dividends
     (1,315)     1,315      
Proceeds from stock options exercised and other
  3,975            3,975   
   
   
Total financing activities
  22,597   (1,740)  144,165   (105,341)  59,681   
Effect of exchange rate on cash
          (3,101)      (3,101)  
   
   
Net increase (decrease) in cash
  (15,017)  (894)  (23,721)     (39,632)  
Cash at the beginning of period
  76,970   985   57,465      135,420   
   
   
Cash at the end of period
  $61,953   $91   $33,744   $–   95,788   
   
   

54


Table of Contents

 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2009
 
                       
  Parent
   Non
 Adjustments/
    
  In thousands Company Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated  
 
 
Net cash provided (used) by
                      
Operating activities
  $102,891   $17,534   $46,668   $(3,225)  $163,868   
Investing activities
                      
Purchase of plant, equipment and timberlands
  (14,040)  (137)  (12,080)     (26,257)  
Proceeds from disposal plant, equipment and timberlands
     951         951   
Proceeds from timberland installment note receivable
        37,850      37,850   
Repayments from (advances of) intercompany loans, net
  9,186   (9,394)     208      
   
   
Total investing activities
  (4,854)  (8,580)  25,770   208   12,544   
Financing activities
                      
Net (repayments of) proceeds from indebtedness
  (22,725)     (36,008)     (58,733)  
Payment of dividends to shareholders
  (16,596)           (16,596)  
(Repayments) borrowings of intercompany loans, net
  9,394   (5,500)  (3,686)  (208)     
Payment of intercompany dividends
     (3,225)     3,225      
   
   
Total financing activities
  (29,927)  (8,725)  (39,694)  3,017   (75,329)  
Effect of exchange rate on cash
        2,103      2,103   
   
   
Net increase (decrease) in cash
  68,110   229   34,847      103,186   
Cash at the beginning of period
  8,860   756   22,618      32,234   
   
   
Cash at the end of period
  $76,970   $985   $57,465   $–   $135,420   
   
   
 
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2008
 
                       
  Parent
   Non
 Adjustments/
    
  In thousands Company Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated  
 
 
Net cash provided (used) by
                      
Operating activities
  $15,641   $26,929   $34,455   $(23,600)  $53,425   
Investing activities
                      
Purchase of plant, equipment and timberlands
  (19,998)  (880)  (31,591)     (52,469)  
Proceeds from disposal plant, equipment and timberlands
  19,279            19,279   
Repayments from (advances of) intercompany loans, net
  4,593   (19,678)  (17,502)  32,587      
Return (contributions) of intercompany capital, net
     24,997      (24,997)     
   
   
Total investing activities
  3,874   4,439   (49,093)  7,590   (33,190)  
Financing activities
                      
Net (repayments of) proceeds from indebtedness
  (39,196)     41,621      2,425   
Payment of dividends to shareholders
  (16,469)           (16,469)  
(Repayments) borrowings of intercompany loans, net
  39,280   (7,174)  481   (32,587)     
Return of intercompany capital, net
        (24,997)  24,997       
Payment of intercompany dividends
     (23,600)     23,600       
Proceeds from stock options exercised and other
  1,165            1,165   
   
   
Total financing activities
  (15,220)  (30,774)  17,105   16,010   (12,879)  
Effect of exchange rate on cash
  (2,128)     (2,827)     (4,955)  
   
   
Net increase (decrease ) in cash
  2,167   594   (360)     2,401   
Cash at the beginning of period
  6,693   162   22,978       29,833   
   
   
Cash at the end of period
  $8,860   $756   $22,618   $–   $32,234   
   
   

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    55


Table of Contents

 
23.  QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
 
                                       
        Diluted
  
        Earnings (loss)
  
  Net sales Gross Profit Net Income (loss) Per Share  
   
In thousands,
                      
except per share 2010  2009 2010  2009 2010  2009 2010  2009  
   
First
 $337,275   $291,552  $44,216   $43,314  $(374)   $11,538  $(0.01)  $0.25   
Second
  362,781    278,979   35,460    59,001   103    19,870       0.43   
Third
  379,097    312,358   55,740    82,465   39,437    45,994   0.85    1.00   
Fourth
  376,178    301,121   50,831    84,984   15,268    46,040   0.33    1.00   
 
 
 
 
The information set forth above includes the following, on an after-tax basis:
 
                              
  Alternative Fuel
 Gains (losses) on Sales
 Acquisition Integration
  
  Mixture/Cellulosic Biofuel
 of Plant, Equipment and
 Costs/Foreign currency
  
  Credits Timberlands Hedge Loss  
   
In thousands 2010  2009 2010  2009 2010  2009  
 
First
 $   $  $   $378  $(9,078)   $–   
Second
      30,418   99    (441)  (915)      
Third
  23,100    32,890       (5)  (407)      
Fourth
  84    32,456   964    65   (345)   (1,768)  
 
 
 

56


Table of Contents

 
ITEM 9  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
 
None.
 
ITEM 9A  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e)and15d-15(e)),as of December 31, 2010, have concluded that, as of the evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
 
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
 
Management’s report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f)and15d-15(f))and the related report of our independent registered public accounting firm are included in Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2010, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting
 
ITEM 9B  OTHER INFORMATION
 
None.
 
PART III
 
ITEM 10  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 
Directors  The information with respect to directors required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about March 30, 2011. Our board of directors has determined that, based on the relevant experience of the members of the Audit Committee, all members are audit committee financial experts as this term is set forth in the applicable regulations of the SEC.
 
Executive Officers of the Registrant  The information with respect to the executive officers required under this Item incorporated herein by reference to “Executive Officers” as set forth in Part I, page 12 of this report.
 
We have adopted a Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers in compliance with applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and our principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Code of Ethical Business Conduct is filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report onForm 10-Kand is available on our website, free of charge, at www.glatfelter.com.
 
ITEM 11  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about March 30, 2011.
 
ITEM 12  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
 
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about March 30, 2011.
 
ITEM 13  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
 
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about March 30, 2011.
 
ITEM 14  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
 
The information required under this Item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement, to be dated on or about March 30, 2011.
 
Our Chief Executive Officer has certified to the New York Stock Exchange that he is not aware of any violations by the Company of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
 

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    57


Table of Contents

 
 
PART IV
 
ITEM 15  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
         
(a)
  1.    Our Consolidated Financial Statements as follows are included in Part II, Item 8:
      i. Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
      ii. Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009
      iii. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
      iv. Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
      v. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
   2.    Financial Statement Schedules (Consolidated) are included in Part IV:
      i. Schedule II -Valuation and Qualifying Accounts – For Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended December 31, 2010
 
(b)  Exhibit Index
 
             
Exhibit Number Description of Documents Incorporated by Reference to
 
        Exhibit Filing
 
 2  (a)   
Share Purchase Agreement, dated January 4, 2010, among Brookfield Special Situations Management Limited, P. H. Glatfelter Company and Glatfelter Canada, Inc., (the schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) ofRegulation S-Kand will be provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request) filed herewith.
 2(a) 2009 Form 10-K
    (b)   
Amendment to the Share Purchase Agreement, dated February 12, 2010, filed herewith.
 2(b) 2009 Form 10-K
 3  (a)   
Articles of Incorporation, as amended through December 20, 2007 (restated for the purpose of filing on EDGAR)
 3(b) 2007 Form 10-K
    (b)   
By-Laws as amended through March 3, 2011
 3.2 March 3, 2011
Form 8-K
 4.1 (a)   
Indenture, dated as of February 5, 2010 by and between the Company, Guarantors named therein and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as trustee relating to 71/8Notes due 2016.
 4.1 February 5, 2010
Form 8-K
    (b)   
Indenture, dated as of April 28, 2006, by and between the Company and SunTrust Bank, as trustee relating to 71/8Notes due 2016
 4.1 May 3, 2006
Form 8-K
    (c)   
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 22, 2006, among Glatfelter Holdings, LLC, Glatfelter Holdings II, LLC, the Existing Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and SunTrust Bank relating to 71/8Notes due 2016
 4.3 September 22, 2006
Form S-4/A
 4.2     
Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 5, 2010, among the Company, the Guarantors named therein and the Initial Purchasers
 4.2 February 5, 2010
Form 8-K
 10  (a)   
P. H. Glatfelter Company Amended and Restated Management Incentive Plan, effective January 1, 2010**
 10.1 May 5, 2010
Form 8-K
    (b)   
P. H. Glatfelter Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective April 23, 1998 and further amended December 20, 2000**
 10(c) 2000 Form 10-K**
    (c)   
P. H. Glatfelter Company Supplemental Management Pension Plan, effective as of April 23, 1998**
 10(f) 1998 Form 10-K**
    (d)   
P. H. Glatfelter Company Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan**
 10.1 May 5, 2009
Form 8-K
    (e) (A) 
Form of Top Management Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate.**
 10.2 May 5, 2009
Form 8-K
    (e) (B) 
Form of Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate**
 10.3 April 27, 2005
Form 8-K
    (f)   
P. H. Glatfelter Company Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, effective as of April 22, 1998**
 10(h) 1998 Form 10-K**
    (g)   
Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P.H. Glatfelter Company and George H. Glatfelter II, dated as of December 8, 2008
 10(i) 2008 Form 10-K
    (h)   
Form of Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and certain employees, dated as of December 8, 2008**
 10(j) 2008Form 10-K
    (h) (A) 
Schedule of Change in Control Employment Agreements**
 10(j)A 2008Form 10-K
    (i)   
Guidelines for Executive Severance**
 10.2 July 6, 2010
Form 8-K
    (j)   
Agreement between the State of Wisconsin and Certain Companies Concerning the Fox River, dated as of January 31, 1997, among P. H. Glatfelter Company, Fort Howard Corporation, NCR Corporation, Appleton Papers Inc., Riverside Paper Corporation, U.S. Paper Mills, Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc. and the State of Wisconsin
 10(i) 1996 Form 10-K
    (k)   
Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and Dante C. Parrini, dated July 2, 2010.**
 10.1 July 2, 2010
Form 8-K

58


Table of Contents

 
             
Exhibit Number Description of Documents Incorporated by Reference to
 
        Exhibit Filing
 
    (l)   
Credit Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2010, by and among the Company, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries as borrowers, certain of the Company’s subsidiaries as guarantors, the banks party thereto, PNC Bank, National Association, as agent for the banks under the Credit Agreement, PNC Capital Markets LLC and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, as joint arrangers and bookrunners, Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, as syndication agent.
 10.1 June 30, 2010
Form 10-Q
    (m)   
Consent Decree for Remedial Design and Remedial Action at Operable Unit 1 of the Lower Fox River and Green Bay site by and among the United States of America and the State of Wisconsin v. P. H. Glatfelter Company and WTMI Company (f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills, Inc.)
 10.3(a) June 30, 2010
Form 10-Q
    (m) (A) 
Agreed Supplement to Consent Decree between United States of America and the State of Wisconsin vs. P.H. Glatfelter Company and WTM I Company (f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc.)
 10.3(b) June 30, 2010
Form 10-Q
    (m) (B) 
Second Agreed Supplement to Consent Decree between United States of America and the State of Wisconsin vs. P.H. Glatfelter Company and WTM I Company (f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc.)
 10.3(c) June 30, 2010
Form 10-Q
    (n)   
Amended Consent Decree for Remedial Design and Remedial Action at Operable Unit 1 of the Lower Fox River and Green Bay Site by and among the United States of America and the State of Wisconsin v. P. H. Glatfelter and WTM I Company (f/k/a Wisconsin Tissue Mills Inc.), certain Appendices have been intentionally omitted, copies of which can be obtained free of charge from the Registrant)
 10.3(d) June 30, 2010
Form 10-Q
    (o)   
Administrative Order for Remedial Action dated November 13, 2007; issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency
 10.2 Nov 19, 2007
Form 8-K
    (p)   
Compensatory Arrangements with Certain Executive Officers, filed herewith**
    
    (q)   
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation (effective January 1, 2007), filed herewith**
    
    (r)   
Service Agreement, commencing on August 1, 2007, between the Registrant (through a wholly owned subsidiary) and Martin Rapp**
 10(r) 2006 Form 10-K
    (s)   
Retirement Pension Contract, dated October 31, 2008, between Registrant (through a wholly owned subsidiary) and Martin Rapp**
 10(t) 2007 Form 10-K
    (t)   
Form of Stock-Only Stock Appreciation Right Award Certificate**
 10.3 May 5, 2009
Form 8-K
    (u)   
Form of 2007 Top Management Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate**
 10(t) 2006 Form 10-K
    (v)   
Timberland Purchase & Sale Agreement – Virginia Timberlands, entered into by and among Glawson Investments Corp., GIC Investments LLC and Glatfelter Pulp Wood Company, dated and effective as of August 8, 2007
 10.1 Sept. 30, 2007
Form 10-Q
    (w)   
Term Loan Agreement dated January 15, 2008, among GPW Virginia Timberlands LLC, certain lenders party thereto and SunTrust Bank, in its capacity as agent for such lenders
 10.2 June 30, 2010
Form 10-Q
 14      
Code of Business Ethics for the CEO and Senior Financial Officers of Glatfelter
 14 2003 Form 10-K
 21      
Subsidiaries of the Registrant, filed herewith
    
 23      
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, filed herewith.
    
 31.1     
Certification of Dante C. Parrini, President and Chief Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 302 (a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, filed herewith
    
 31.2     
Certification of John P. Jacunski, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 302 (a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, filed herewith
    
 32.1     
Certification of Dante C. Parrini, President and Chief Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith
    
 32.2     
Certification of John P. Jacunski, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, filed herewith
    
 
 
**Management contract or compensatory plan

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    59


Table of Contents

 
 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY
(Registrant)
March 11, 2011
  By 
/s/  Dante C. Parrini
Dante C. Parrini
President and
  Chief Executive Officer
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
 
     
Date Signature Capacity
 
 
     
March 11, 2011
 
/s/  Dante C. Parrini

Dante C. Parrini
President and Chief Executive Officer
 Principal Executive Officer and Director
     
March 11, 2011
 
/s/  John P. Jacunski

John P. Jacunski
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 Principal Financial Officer
     
March 11, 2011
 
/s/  David C. Elder

David C. Elder
Vice President and Corporate Controller
 Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
     
March 11, 2011
 
/s/  George H. Glatfelter II

George H. Glatfelter II
 Chairman of the Board
     
March 11, 2011
 
/s/  Kathleen A. Dahlberg

Kathleen A. Dahlberg
 Director
     
March 11, 2011
 
/s/  Nicholas DeBenedictis

Nicholas DeBenedictis
 Director
     
March 11, 2011
 
/s/  Richard C. Ill

Richard C. Ill
 Director
     
March 11, 2011
 
/s/  J. Robert Hall

J. Robert Hall
 Director
     
March 11, 2011
 
/s/  Ronald J. Naples

Ronald J. Naples
 Director
     
March 11, 2011
 
/s/  Richard L. Smoot

Richard L. Smoot
 Director
     
March 11, 2011
 
/s/  Lee C. Stewart

Lee C. Stewart
 Director

60


Table of Contents

 
 
P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
 
For each of the three years ended December 31, 2010
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
 
                             
  Allowance for  
   
  In thousands  Doubtful Accounts Sales Discounts and Deductions  
   
  2010  2009 2008 2010  2009 2008  
     
Balance, beginning of year
  $2,888    $2,633   $3,117   $2,789    $3,369   $4,345   
Provision
  1,269    506   (36)  3,593    3,575   6,620   
Write-offs, recoveries and discounts allowed
  (993)   (306)  (296)  (3,517)   (4,197)  (6,045)  
Other(a)
  (46)   55   (152)  (20)   42   (1,551)  
   
   
Balance, end of year
  $3,118    $2,888   $2,633   $2,845    $2,789   $3,369   
   
   
 
The provision for doubtful accounts is included in selling, general and administrative expense and the provision for sales discounts and deductions is deducted from sales. The related allowances are deducted from accounts receivable.
 
(a)Relates primarily to changes in currency exchange rates and, in 2008, a change in presentation of certain customer rebates.

Glatfelter 2010 Annual Report    61