SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002
Commission File Number: 1-9047
Independent Bank Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts
04-2870273
(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)
288 Union Street, Rockland, Massachusetts 02370
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(781) 878-6100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
As of November 1, 2002, there were 14,457,919 shares of the issuers common stock outstanding, par value $.01 per share.
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
3
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) -Nine months and quarter ended September 30, 2002 and 2001
4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity -Nine months ended September 30, 2002 (unaudited) and for the year ended December 31, 2001
5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) -Nine months and quarter ended September 30, 2002 and 2001
6
7
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
14
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
35
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
36
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 5.
Other Information
Item 6.
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Signatures
37
Certifications
38
2
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
INDEPENDENT BANK CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30,2002
December 31,2001
(In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
$
66,791
66,967
FEDERAL FUNDS SOLD & SHORT TERM INVESTMENTS
14,700
6,000
TRADING ASSETS
1,051
1,150
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
554,821
569,288
SECURITIES HELD TO MATURITY (fair value $161,682 and $128,599)
157,535
132,754
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK STOCK
17,036
LOANS
Commercial & Industrial
150,981
151,287
Commercial Real Estate
472,088
463,052
Residential Real Estate
262,423
229,123
Real Estate Construction
65,672
47,208
Consumer - Installment
332,394
324,271
Consumer - Other
101,008
83,997
TOTAL LOANS
1,384,566
1,298,938
LESS: RESERVE FOR LOAN LOSSES
(20,836
)
(18,190
NET LOANS
1,363,730
1,280,748
BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, Net
31,002
29,919
GOODWILL
36,236
MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
1,594
1,538
BANK OWNED LIFE INSURANCE
36,647
35,233
OTHER ASSETS
20,041
22,319
TOTAL ASSETS
2,301,184
2,199,188
LIABILITIES
DEPOSITS
Demand Deposits
427,112
378,663
Savings and Interest Checking Accounts
444,128
413,198
Money Market and Super Interest Checking Accounts
342,125
249,328
Time Certificates of Deposit over $100,000
102,292
132,545
Other Time Certificates of Deposits
376,387
407,884
TOTAL DEPOSITS
1,692,044
1,581,618
FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED AND ASSETS SOLD UNDER REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
75,397
66,176
TREASURY TAX AND LOAN NOTES
3,199
6,967
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BORROWINGS
293,629
313,934
OTHER LIABILITIES
35,520
21,903
TOTAL LIABILITIES
2,099,789
1,990,598
CORPORATION-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES OF SUBSIDIARY TRUST HOLDING SOLELY JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES OF THE CORPORATION
47,746
75,329
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value. Authorized: 1,000,000 Shares Outstanding: None
Common Stock, $.01 par value. Authorized: 30,000,000 Issued: 14,863,821 Shares at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001
149
Treasury Stock: 415,055 Shares at September 30, 2002 and 536,285 at December 31, 2001
(6,491
(8,369
Total Outstanding Stock: 14,448,766 at September 30, 2002 and 14,327,536 at December 31, 2001
Paid-in-Capital
42,043
43,633
Retained Earnings
105,633
92,779
Other Accumulated Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax
12,315
5,069
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
153,649
133,261
TOTAL LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTEREST IN SUBSIDIARIES, AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
INDEPENDENT BANK CORP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited - - In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
NINE MONTHS ENDEDSEPTEMBER 30,
THREE MONTHS ENDEDSEPTEMBER 30,
2002 (1)
2001
2002
INTEREST INCOME
Interest on Loans
74,306
76,087
24,907
25,684
Interest and Dividends on Securities
31,703
31,594
10,430
11,063
Interest on Trading Assets
21
Interest on Federal Funds Sold and Short Term Investments
330
664
189
224
Total Interest Income
106,360
108,350
35,540
36,973
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on Deposits
19,609
30,773
6,056
9,323
Interest on Borrowings
12,001
12,017
4,057
3,962
Total Interest Expense
31,610
42,790
10,113
13,285
Net Interest Income
74,750
65,560
25,427
23,688
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
3,600
2,787
1,200
1,273
Net Interest Income After Provision For Loan Losses
71,150
62,773
24,227
22,415
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
7,368
6,444
2,562
2,279
Investment Management Services
4,079
3,361
1,133
1,004
Mortgage Banking Income
1,965
1,568
325
373
BOLI Income
1,376
1,345
468
458
Net (Loss)/Gain on Sales of Securities
(38
1,428
226
Other Non-Interest Income
2,105
1,680
845
628
Total Non-Interest Income
16,855
15,826
5,295
4,968
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES
Salaries and Employee Benefits
29,174
26,473
10,492
9,371
Occupancy and Equipment Expenses
6,473
7,377
2,154
2,571
Data Processing & Facilities Management
3,185
3,137
1,011
1,161
Impairment Charge
4,372
Goodwill Amortization
2,124
708
Other Non-Interest Expenses
14,133
12,238
4,222
4,095
Total Non-Interest Expenses
57,337
51,349
17,879
17,906
Minority Interest Expense
3,950
4,157
1,082
1,391
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
26,718
23,093
10,561
8,086
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
8,675
7,330
3,588
2,619
NET INCOME
18,043
15,763
6,973
5,467
LESS: TRUST PREFERRED ISSUANCE COSTS WRITE-OFF (NET OF TAX)
1,505
NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
16,538
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
1.15
1.10
0.48
0.38
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
1.13
1.09
Weighted average common shares (Basic)
14,402,509
14,279,394
14,446,066
14,300,654
Common stock equivalents
211,198
140,270
163,950
160,418
Weighted average common shares (Diluted)
14,613,707
14,419,664
14,610,016
14,461,072
(1) Reflects the restatment of the six months ended June 30, 2002 for the nonamortization of goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 147.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited - Dollars in Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)
COMMONSTOCK
TREASURYSTOCK
SURPLUS
RETAINEDEARNINGS
OTHERACCUMULATEDCOMPREHENSIVEINCOME
TOTAL
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2000
(9,495
44,078
77,028
2,952
114,712
Net Income
22,052
Cash Dividends Declared ($.44 per share)
(6,301
Cumulative effect of SFAS 133 adoption, Net of tax
Fair value of derivatives at January 1, 2001
467
Reclassification of securities from HTM to AFS
(96
Proceeds From Exercise of Stock Options
1,126
(479
647
Tax Benefit on Stock Option Exercise
34
Change in Fair Value of Derivatives During Period
742
Change in Unrealized Gain on Securities Available For Sale, Net of Tax
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2001
BALANCE JANUARY 1, 2002
Net Income (1)
Cash Dividends Declared ($.36 per share)
(5,189
Write off of Stock Issuance Costs, Net of Tax
(1,505
1,878
(516
1,362
431
Change in Fair Value of Derivatives During Period, Net of Tax
(1,387
8,633
BALANCE SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
(1) Reflects the restatement of the six months ended June 30, 2002 for the nonamotization of goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 147.
The accompanying notes are an intergral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited - In Thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET INCOME TO NET CASH PROVIDED FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Depreciation and amortization
3,745
5,833
Provision for loan losses
Loans originated for resale
(97,368
(69,991
Proceeds from mortgage loan sales
97,538
69,620
(Gain)/loss on sale of mortgages
(169
371
(Gain)/loss recorded from mortgage servicing rights
(56
18
Impairment charge on Security
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in other assets
(6,013
Increase in other liabilities
6,594
7,301
TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS
20,361
9,926
NET CASH PROVIDED FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
38,404
25,689
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from maturities of Securities Held to Maturity
11,583
701
Proceeds from maturities/sales of Securities Available For Sale
165,735
211,510
Purchase of Securities Held to Maturity
(41,673
(29,856
Purchase of Securities Available For Sale
(136,658
(256,492
Net increase in Loans
(86,582
(105,221
Investment in Bank Premises and Equipment
(4,195
(2,876
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
(91,790
(182,234
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net (decrease) in Time Deposits
(61,750
(30,011
Net increase in Other Deposits
172,176
108,916
Net increase (decrease) in Federal Funds Purchased and Assets Sold Under Repurchase Agreements
9,221
(7,368
Net (decrease) increase in Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings
(20,305
93,695
Net decrease in Treasury Tax & Loan Notes
(3,768
(1,567
Redemption of corporation-obligated mandatorily redeemable trust preferred securities of subsidiary trust holding solely junior subordinated debentures of the Corporation
(53,750
Issuance of corporation-obligated mandatorily redeemable trust preferred securities of subsidiary trust holding solely junior subordinated debentures of the Corporation
23,756
54
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
386
Dividends Paid
(5,032
(4,565
NET CASH PROVIDED FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
61,910
159,540
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
8,524
2,995
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT THE BEGINNING OF PERIOD
72,967
58,005
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
81,491
61,000
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest on deposits and borrowings
30,711
44,219
Minority Interest
Income taxes
4,417
3,413
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
(Decrease) Increase in fair value of derivatives, net of tax
1,272
Transfer of securities from HTM to AFS
750
102,801
Issuance of shares from Treasury Stock for the exercise of stock options
868
Write-off of unamortized Trust Preferred issuance costs upon redemption, net of tax
DISCLOSURE OF ACCOUNTING POLICY:
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, and fed funds sold and assets purchased under resale agreements. Generally, federal funds are sold for up to two week periods.
(1) Reflects the restatement of the six months ended June 30, 2002 for the nonamortization of goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 147.
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Independent Bank Corp. (the Company) is a state chartered, federally registered bank holding company headquartered in Rockland, Massachusetts. The Company is the sole stockholder of Rockland Trust Company (Rockland or the Bank), a Massachusetts trust company chartered in 1907. The Companys other subsidiaries are Independent Capital Trust III and Independent Capital Trust IV, each of which have issued trust preferred securities to the public. Independent Capital Trust I and II were liquidated earlier this year upon redemption of their trust preferred securities. The Banks subsidiaries consist of two Massachusetts securities corporations; RTC Securities Corp. and RTC Securities Corp. X, as well as South Shore Holdings, Ltd. (South Shore Holdings), a holding Company for Rockland Preferred Capital Corporation, a Massachusetts Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT).
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements, primarily consisting of normal recurring adjustments, have been included. Operating results for the nine months and the three month period ended September 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2002 or any other interim period. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
NOTE 2 - GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
On October 1, 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions. The statement allows for financial institutions that have certain unidentifiable intangible assets that arose from business combinations where the fair value of liabilities assumed exceeded the fair value of assets acquired to reclassify these assets to goodwill as of the later of the date of acquisition or the application date of SFAS 142, January 1, 2002.
The reclassified goodwill shall be accounted for and reported prospectively as goodwill under SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Any previously recognized amortization of such reclassified unidentified intangible asset that was recorded subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 142 shall be restated to the application date of SFAS 142, January 1, 2002. When financial information is presented for these dates, that financial information is to
be presented on the restated basis. The reclassified goodwill will be subject to the impairment provisions of SFAS 142 and the impairment test shall be completed by the end of the fiscal year.
As permitted by the FASB, the Company has adopted SFAS No. 147 as of September 30, 2002 and retroactively ceased amortization of goodwill. The restated balance of the goodwill, including the unidentifiable intangible asset that has been reclassified to goodwill at September 30, 2002 is $36.2 million, compared to $34.2 million had the Company not adopted the statement and retroactively ceased amortization.
The following schedule is a reconcilement of net income and earnings per share excluding intangible asset amortization for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001:
IMPACT OF INTANGIBLE ASSET AMORTIZATION ON NET INCOME AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
For the Quarter Ended
Nine Months Ended
March 31,2002
March 31,2001
June 30,2002
June 30,2001
Sept. 30,2002
Sept. 30,2001
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Reported (1):
6,401
5,377
3,783
4,919
6,534
16,717
Diluted EPS (2)
0.39
0.37
0.21
0.34
0.45
1.04
Intangible Asset Amortization (3)
443
460
444
439
1,326
1,381
Impact to EPS
0.03
0.04
0.09
0.10
Restated/Adjusted (4):
6,844
5,837
4,227
5,379
5,927
17,144
0.42
0.41
0.24
1.19
(1) We did not report earnings with intangible asset amortization as of September 30, 2002, however, results are shown in this table as though they were for informational purposes.
(2) Net Income shown above does not include the Write-off of Trust Preferred Issuance Costs which are included in the calculation of EPS
(3) Net of tax
(4) Net income and diluted earnings per share during the 2002 quarters are shown as restated. Comparative net income and diluted earning per share during the 2001 quarters are shown adjusted for intangible asset amortization, these periods will not be restated.
8
NOTE 3 RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections (SFAS No. 145). SFAS No. 145 among other things addresses financial accounting and reporting of gains and losses from extinguishment of debt. SFAS No. 145 requires gains and losses resulting from the extinguishment of debt to be classified as extraordinary items only if they meet the criteria in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations- Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. This statement rescinds SFAS No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt, SFAS No. 64, Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements, and amends SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases. SFAS No. 145 is effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002, with early application encouraged. The Company does not believe the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities. The statement supersedes Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3 Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). SFAS No. 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. The Company does not believe the adoption of this Statement will have a material impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
See Note 2 for the adoption of SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions.
NOTE 4 - REDEMPTION/ISSUANCE OF TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES
On December 11, 2001, the Company issued, through Independent Trust III, 1,000,000 shares of 8.625% Trust Preferred Securities, $25 face value, due December 31, 2031 but callable at the option of the Company on or after December 31, 2006. On January 31, 2002, the Company used the net proceeds from the transaction to call the 1,000,000 shares of 11% Trust Preferred Securities issued by Independent Capital Trust II in January 2000. On April 12, 2002, the Company issued through Independent Capital Trust IV an additional 1,000,000 shares of 8.375% Trust Preferred Securities, $25 face value, due April 30, 2032, but callable at the option of the Company on or after April 30, 2007. The Company used the net proceeds from the transaction to call on May 20, 2002, the 1,150,000 shares of 9.28% Trust Preferred Securities issued by Independent Capital Trust I in May 1997. The Company expects the refinancing of the 11% and 9.28% Trust Preferred Security issuances to reduce the Companys annual pre-tax minority interest expense by approximately $1.2 million.
9
NOTE 5 - WORLDCOM BOND IMPAIRMENT CHARGE
The Company recognized a pre-tax securities impairment charge of $4.4 million ($2.5 million net of tax, or 17 cents per diluted share) during the second quarter of 2002 on an investment in corporate bonds issued by WorldCom Inc. (the WorldCom Bonds) with a book value of $5.1 million. The WorldCom Bonds were purchased in May 2001, with a 7.875% coupon and a May 15, 2003 maturity date. Upon determination of the impairment on the WorldCom Bonds, the securities were reclassified from held to maturity to available for sale. On July 18, 2002 the Company sold the WorldCom Bonds for $712,500, with a book value of $750,000, resulting in a realized loss of $37,500 recognized in the third quarter of 2002.
NOTE 6 - CONTINGENCY: REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST TAXATION (REIT)
As previously disclosed, in June 2002 the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (DOR) began to issue Notices of Intent to Assess additional excise tax to numerous financial institutions in Massachusetts that have a REIT in their corporate structure.
In 1997 Rockland, through its subsidiary South Shore Holdings, formed a second-tier REIT subsidiary. On November 7, 2002 South Shore Holdings received from the DOR a Notice of Intent to Assess additional state excise tax for the years ended 1999, 2000, and 2001. The DOR contends that, under Massachusetts law, dividend distributions to South Shore Holdings from its REIT are fully taxable. Management has estimated the impact to be approximately $3.3 million, net of federal benefit and excluding interest and penalties, for 1999 through September of 2002.
The Company believes that the Massachusetts statute that provides for a dividends received deduction equal to 95% of certain dividend distributions applies to the distributions made to South Shore Holdings from its REIT. As a consequence, no provision has been made in the Companys financial statements for the amounts assessed or for additional amounts that the DOR might assess in the future. The Company intends to vigorously defend its position and appeal the assessment when issued.
10
NOTE 7 - EARNINGS PER SHARE
Stated below are the basic and diluted earnings per share for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
LESS: TRUSTPREFERREDISSUANCE COSTSWRITE-OFFNET OF TAX
EARNINGSFOR EPS
WEIGHTEDAVERAGESHARES
NET INCOMEPER SHARE
For the nine months ended September 30,
Basic EPS
Effect of dilutive securities
0.02
0.01
Diluted EPS
For the three months ended September 30,
Options to purchase common stock with an exercise price greater than the average market price of common shares for the period are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share, as their effect on earnings per share would be antidilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, there were 8,615 and 187,967 shares, respectively excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share. For the three months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, there were 14,000 and 17,000 shares, respectively, excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
11
NOTE 8 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Information on the Companys comprehensive income, presented net of taxes, is set forth below for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001.
Comprehensive income is reported net of taxes, as follows:
(In Thousands)
FOR THE NINEMONTHS ENDED
FOR THE THREEMONTHS ENDED
SEPT. 30,2002
SEPT. 30,2001
(1)
Other Comprehensive Income:
Cumulative effect of FAS 133 adoption
Reclassification of securities from HTM to AFS on January 1, 2001
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale
8,595
8,337
4,981
4,311
Less: reclassification adjustment for realized losses/(gains) included in net earnings
(928
(147
Net change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale
7,409
5,019
4,164
(Decrease)/Increase in fair value of derivatives
(659
(177
1,065
Less: reclassification of realized gains on derivatives
(728
(1,940
Net change in fair value of derivatives
(2,117
Other Comprehensive Income
7,246
9,052
2,902
5,229
Comprehensive Income
25,289
24,815
9,875
10,696
NOTE 9 - SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company has identified its reportable operating business segment as community banking, based on how the business is strategically managed by the Chief Executive Officer, who is the chief operating decision-maker. The Companys community banking business segment consists of commercial banking, retail banking, and investment management. The community banking business segment is managed as a single strategic unit which derives its revenues from a wide range of banking services, including lending activities, acceptance of demand, savings and time deposits, investment management, and mortgage servicing income from investors. The Company does not have a single customer from whom it derives ten percent or more of its revenues, and operates in the southeastern area of Massachusetts.
Non-reportable operating segments of the Companys operations, which do not have similar characteristics to the community banking operations and do not meet the quantitative thresholds requiring disclosure, are included in the other category in the disclosure of business segments below. For the periods presented, these non-reportable segments include financial information with respect to the Company and Independent Capital Trusts I, II, III and IV.
12
Information about reportable segments and reconciliation of such information to the consolidated financial statements for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 follows:
RECONCILIATION TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CommunityBanking
Other
Eliminations
Consolidated
For the nine months ended September 30, 2002 (1)
74,603
9,940
(9,793
Non-Interest Income
10,211
(10,211
19,885
18,162
(20,004
Total Assets
2,299,784
257,189
(255,789
For the nine months ended September 30, 2001
65,516
(4,145
4,189
22,891
(22,891
18,576
15,889
(18,702
2,143,691
246,202
(245,574
2,144,319
For the three months ended September 30, 2002
25,415
3,864
(3,852
(3,745
7,564
7,006
(7,597
For the three months ended September 30, 2001
23,669
(1,377
1,396
8,322
(8,322
6,884
5,509
(6,926
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates performance based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes, not including non-recurring gains or losses.
The Company derives a majority of its revenues from interest income and the chief operating decision maker relies primarily on net interest revenue to assess the performance of the segments and make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment. Therefore, the segments are reported above using net interest income.
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, notes and tables included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The discussion may contain certain forward-looking statements regarding the future performance of the Company. All forward-looking information is inherently uncertain and actual results may differ materially from the assumptions, estimates or expectations reflected or contained in the forward-looking information. Please refer to Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information of this Form 10-Q for a further discussion.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SUMMARY
The Company reported net income of $7.0 million for the third quarter 2002 as compared with net income of $5.5 million for the third quarter of 2001. Diluted earnings per share were $0.48 for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to $0.38 per share for the prior quarter.
For the three months ended September 30, 2002, the Company recorded net operating earnings of $7.0 million. This represents an increase of 32.1% from the $5.3 million of net operating earnings reported for the three months ended September 30, 2001, respectively. Diluted operating earnings per share were $0.48 and $0.37 for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Company summarizes the financial results for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001 on both an operating basis and on an actual basis. These results are as follows:
Net Operating Earnings*
Year To Date September 30,
Quarter Ended September 30,
% Change
Net Operating Earnings
20,613
14,835
38.9
%
6,998
5,320
31.5
1.41
1.03
36.9
29.7
ROAA
1.23
0.97
1.01
ROAE
19.43
16.11
18.93
16.58
*Excludes the following items (net of tax)
Securities Losses/(Gains)
25
Securities Impairment Charge
2,545
0
Trust preferred issuance costs write-off
Net Income, as reported
14.5
27.5
Trust Preferred Issuance costs write-off
Net Income Available to Common Shareholders
4.9
3.7
26.3
1.08
17.01
17.11
18.87
17.04
Net interest income increased $1.7 million or 7.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to the same period in 2001. The provision for loan losses decreased to $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared with $1.3 million for the same period last year. Non-interest income increased $0.6 million, or 12.5% excluding the security losses in 2002 and security gains in 2001, while non-interest expense decreased $27,000, or 0.2%.
In October of 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released a new statement, SFAS No. 147, entitled Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions, allowing financial institutions meeting certain criteria to reclassify their unidentifiable intangible asset balances to goodwill and cease amortization beginning as of January 1, 2002. As permitted by the FASB, the Company adopted SFAS No. 147 as of September 30, 2002 and retroactively ceased amortization of goodwill. The restated goodwill balance is $36.2 million and amortization expense of $439,000 and $1.3 million, net of tax, has been added back to net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively. The full year impact to earnings net of tax is $1.8 million, or $0.12 per diluted share.
The annualized consolidated returns on average equity and average assets for the three months ended September 30, 2002 were 18.87% and 1.23%, respectively, compared to 17.04% and 1.04% reported for the same period last year. On an operating basis, the annualized consolidated returns on average equity and average assets for the three months ended
15
September 30, 2002 were 18.93% and 1.23%, respectively, compared to 16.58% and 1.01% reported for the three months ended September 30, 2001.
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $18.0 million compared to $15.8 million for the same period last year. Diluted earnings per share were $1.13 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to $1.09 per share for the same period last year.
On an operating basis, earnings were $20.6 million. This represents an increase of 39.2% from the $14.8 million of net operating earnings reported for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Diluted operating earnings per share were $1.41 and $1.03 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Net interest income increased $9.2 million or 14.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The provision for loan losses increased to $3.6 million for the first nine months of 2002, compared with $2.8 million for the same period last year. Non-interest income increased $2.5 million, or 17.3% excluding the security losses of ($38,000) in 2002 and security gains of $1.4 million in 2001, while non-interest expense increased $1.6 million, or 3.1%, excluding the WorldCom Bonds impairment charge of $4.4 million, over the first nine months of 2001.
The annualized consolidated returns on average equity and average assets for the first nine months of 2002 were 17.01% and 1.08%, respectively, compared to 17.11% and 1.04% reported for the same period last year. On an operating basis, the annualized returns on average equity and average assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 were 19.43% and 1.23%, respectively, compared to 16.11% and 0.97% reported for the nine months ended September 30, 2001.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the Company, through a subsidiary Trust, redeemed $28.8 million of 9.28% Trust Preferred Securities which were issued in May of 1997. This redemption was another step in a refinancing strategy designed to lower the Companys cost of capital which began in December 2001, when the Company issued $25 million of 8.625% Trust Preferred Securities and concluded in April 2002 with the issuance of $25 million of 8.375% Trust Preferred Securities. In accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), the unamortized portion of the issuance costs ($767,000) net of tax, on the 9.28% Trust Preferred Securities were written-off during the second quarter as a charge to equity and included within the calculation of earnings per share available to common shareholders. The Company also wrote-off the unamortized portion of the issuance costs ($738,000) net of tax, associated with the $25 million of 11% Trust Preferred Securities which were effectively refinanced by the issuance of the aforementioned $25 million 8.625% Trust Preferred Securities.
The Company recognized a securities impairment charge of $4.4 million ($2.5 million net of tax, or 17 cents per diluted share) during the second quarter of 2002 on an investment in WorldCom Bonds. Despite the recognition of the securities impairment charge, the Company improved net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to the same period for the prior year by $2.3 million. The WorldCom bonds had a 7.875% coupon and a May 15, 2003 maturity date. On July 18, 2002 the Company sold the WorldCom Bonds for $712,000, with a remaining book value of $750,000, resulting in a realized loss of $37,500 in the third quarter of 2002.
16
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income is the difference between income on earning assets such as loans, leases and securities, and interest expense paid on liabilities such as deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by the level of interest rates, changes in interest rates and by changes in the amount and the combination of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Fully tax equivalent net interest income for the third quarter of 2002 increased $1.8 million to $25.8 million as compared to the third quarter of 2001. The Companys net interest margin decreased to 4.90% for the third quarter of 2002 from 4.94% in the third quarter of 2001. The Companys interest rate spread (the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities) increased by 11 basis points to 4.34% during the third quarter of 2002 as compared to the third quarter of 2001. Management anticipates that the net interest margin will contract in the coming months as assets continue to reprice at historically low levels without a corresponding decrease in rates paid. Management continues to take steps to protect the net interest margin and improve the Banks asset sensitivity, such as emphasizing adjustable rate loan production, shorter-term investments and longer-term funding.
The Companys fully tax equivalent net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 amounted to $76.0 million, an increase of $9.5 million, or 14.2%, from the comparable nine months in 2001. The Companys net interest margin increased from 4.77% to 4.90% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The increase in the net interest margin is due to a lower cost of funds and a balance sheet that was well positioned to benefit from the Federal Reserves easing of interest rates in 2001.
The average balance of interest-earning assets for the third quarter of 2002 amounted to $2.1 billion, an increase of $164.3 million, or 8.5%, from the comparable time frame in 2001. Loans increased by $96.8 million, or 7.7%. Investments increased by $67.5 million, or 9.8%. Income from interest-earning assets amounted to $35.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of $1.3 million, or 3.6%, from the three months ended September 30, 2001. The yield on interest earning assets was 6.82% in 2002 compared to 7.67% in 2001.
The average balance of interest-earning assets for the nine months of 2002 amounted to $2.1 billion, an increase of $206.8 million, or 11.1%, from the comparable time frame in 2001. Loans increased by $110.9 million, or 9.1%, resulting from increases in general business volume, primarily in the commercial real estate, residential real estate, and real estate construction categories, as well as home equity loans. Investments increased by $96.0 million, or 15.0%. Income from interest-earning assets amounted to $107.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of $1.7 million, or 1.6%, from the first nine months of 2001. The yield on interest earning assets was 6.94% in 2002 compared to 7.84% in 2001.
Interest income is also impacted by the amount of non-performing loans. The amount of interest due, but not recognized, on non-performing loans amounted to approximately $83,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to $77,000 for the same period in
17
2001 and $225,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $294,000 for the same period in 2001.
The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities for the third quarter of 2002 was $1.6 billion, or 5.8% higher than the comparable 2001 time frame. Average interest bearing deposits increased by $64.4 million, or 5.4%, for the three months ended September 30, 2002 over the same period last year. For the three months ended September 30, 2002, average borrowings were $370.9 million. This represents an increase of $25.1 million or 7.3% from the three months ended September 30, 2001. Notwithstanding the increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities, interest expense decreased by $3.2 million, or 23.9%, to $10.1 million in the third quarter of 2002 as compared to the same period last year. The yield on interest-bearing liabilities was 2.48% in 2002 compared to 3.44% in 2001.
The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities for the first nine months of 2002 was $1.6 billion, or 8.4% higher than the comparable 2001 time frame. Average interest bearing deposits increased by $78.1 million, or 6.7 %, for the first nine months of 2002 over the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, average borrowings were $374.0 million. This represents an increase of $47.7 million or 14.6% from the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Notwithstanding the increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities, interest expense decreased by $11.2 million, or 26.1%, to $31.6 million in the first nine months of as compared to the same period last year. The yield on interest-bearing liabilities was 2.60% in 2002 compared to 3.82% in 2001.
CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND AVERAGE RATE DATA
(Unaudited - Dollars in Thousands)
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
AVERAGEBALANCE2002 (3)
INTERESTEARNED/PAID2002
AVERAGEYIELD2002
AVERAGEBALANCE2001
INTERESTEARNED/PAID2001
AVERAGEYIELD2001
Interest-earning Assets:
Federal Funds Sold and Assets Purchased
Under Resale Agreement
23,626
1.86
19,994
4.43
Trading Assets
1,136
2.46
454
1.47
Taxable Investment Securities
656,995
29,773
6.04
581,028
30,116
6.91
Non-taxable Investment Securities (1)
55,550
2,925
7.02
39,842
2,239
7.49
Loans (1)
1,329,000
74,515
7.48
1,218,149
76,267
8.35
Total Interest-Earning Assets
2,066,307
107,564
6.94
1,859,467
109,291
7.84
Cash and Due from Banks
59,666
63,571
Other Assets
104,261
105,858
2,230,234
2,028,896
Interest-bearing Liabilities:
419,257
2,423
0.77
366,164
3,813
1.39
Money Market & Super Interest Checking Accounts
317,219
4,422
230,125
4,762
2.76
Time Deposits
507,477
12,764
3.35
569,542
22,198
5.20
69,644
606
1.16
68,188
1,766
3.45
Treasury Tax and Loan Notes
4,281
4,242
102
3.21
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
300,088
11,360
5.05
253,904
10,149
5.33
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities
1,617,966
2.60
1,492,165
3.82
391,720
340,735
Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Trust Preferred Securities of SubsidiaryTrust Holding Solely Junior Subordinated Debentures of the Corporation
55,581
51,348
Other Liabilities
23,542
21,832
Total Liabilities
2,088,809
1,906,080
Stockholders Equity
141,425
122,816
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
75,954
66,501
Interest Rate Spread (2)
4.34
4.02
Net Interest Margin (2)
4.90
4.77
(1) The total amount of adjustment to present interest income and yield on a fully tax-equivalent basis is $1,204 and $941 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Also, non-accrual loans have been included in the average loan category, however, unpaid interest on non-accrual loans has not been included for purposes of determining interest income.
(2) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin represents annualized net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets.
(3) Reflects the restatement of the six months ended June 30, 2002 for the nonamortization of goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 147.
19
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
AVERAGEBALANCE2002
Federal Funds Sold and Assets Purchased Under Resale Agreement
41,310
1.83
23,204
3.86
1,105
4.71
1.80
657,095
9,779
5.95
622,087
10,552
6.78
55,842
986
7.06
42,117
774
7.35
1,352,826
24,982
7.39
1,256,037
25,746
8.20
2,108,178
35,949
6.82
1,943,889
37,298
7.67
60,094
57,330
104,455
105,752
2,272,727
2,106,971
428,056
732
0.68
1,193
1.26
348,998
1.72
249,857
1,410
2.26
485,537
3,819
3.15
569,646
6,720
4.72
71,920
213
1.18
71,671
448
2.50
4,652
1.12
4,657
30
2.58
294,320
3,831
5.21
269,466
3,484
5.17
1,633,483
2.48
1,543,960
3.44
417,275
361,026
Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Trust Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trust Holding Solely Junior Subordinated Debentures of the Corporation
47,729
51,362
26,407
22,293
2,124,894
1,978,641
147,833
128,330
25,836
24,013
4.23
4.94
(1) The total amount of adjustment to present interest income and yield on a fully tax-equivalent basis is $409 and $325 for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Also, non-accrual loans have been included in the average loan category, however unpaid interest on non-accrual loans has not been included for purposes of determining interest income.
20
The following table presents certain information on a fully-taxable equivalent basis regarding changes in our interest income and interest expense for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided with respect to changes attributable to (1) changes in rate - - change in rate multiplied by old volume, (2) changes in volume - change in volume multiplied by old rate and (3) changes in volume/rate - change in volume multiplied by change in rate.
Volume Rate Analysis
Nine Months Ended September 30,2002 Compared to 2001
Three Months Ended September 30,2002 Compared to 2001
ChangeDue toRate
ChangeDue toVolume
ChangeDue toVolume/Rate
TotalChange
Income on interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold
(385
121
(70
(334
(118
175
(92
(35
Taxable securities
(3,786
3,938
(495
(343
(1,294
593
(73
(773
Non-taxable securities (1)
(141
882
(55
686
(31
252
(10
212
Trading assets
(7,967
6,940
(725
(1,752
(2,551
1,984
(197
(764
Total
(12,275
11,890
(1,342
(1,727
(3,990
3,008
(367
(1,349
Expense of interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings and Interest Checking accounts
(1,697
553
(246
(1,390
(545
156
(71
(461
Money Market and Super Interest Checking account
(1,554
1,802
(588
(340
(333
559
(132
95
Time deposits
(7,873
(2,419
858
(9,434
(2,239
(992
331
(2,901
Federal funds purchased and assets sold under repurchase agreements
(1,173
(25
(1,160
(236
(1
(235
Treasury tax and loan notes
(67
1
(17
(0
(537
1,846
(98
1,211
23
321
347
(12,902
1,821
(100
(11,180
(3,345
45
128
(3,172
Change in net interest income
627
10,069
(1,242
9,453
(645
2,963
(496
1,823
(1) Interest earned on non-taxable investment securities and loans is shown on a fully tax-equivalent basis
Non-interest income, for the three months ended September 30, 2002 was $5.3 million, compared to $4.7 million for the same period in 2001, excluding security losses and gains of ($38,000) and $226,000, respectively. Non-interest income including security losses and gains for the three months ended September 30, 2002 was $5.3 million compared to $5.0 million for the same period in 2001, respectively. Deposit service charge revenue increased by $0.3 million, or 12.4%, from the three months ended September 30, 2001, reflecting growth in core deposits and lower earnings credit rates (rates used to determine the earnings allowance for customers demand deposit balances). Income from the mortgage banking business decreased $48,000, or 12.9%, for the three months ended September 30, 2002. The decrease in mortgage banking income for the three months ended September 30, 2002, is due to the increased amortization of the mortgage-servicing asset as a result of higher prepayment speeds. Investment management revenue increased $0.1 million, or 12.9%, for the three months ended September 30, 2002, as compared to the same period last year due to an increased level of fees. Other non-interest income increased $217,000, or 34.6%, for the three months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to the same period last year, mainly due to increases in the fair market value adjustment on its fair value hedges of interest rate lock commitments and forward sales agreements amounting to $242,000, which was partially offset by increased losses in trading assets of $59,000.
Non-interest income, excluding security losses and gains of ($38,000) and $1.4 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively was $16.9 million, compared to $14.4 million for the same period in 2001. Non-interest income including security losses and
gains for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001 was $16.9 million and $15.8 million, respectively. Deposit service charge revenue increased by $0.9 million, or 14.3%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2001, reflecting growth in core deposits and lower earnings credit rates (rates used to determine the earnings allowance for customers demand deposit balances). Income from the mortgage banking business increased $0.4 million, or 25.3%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 as volume continued at high levels reflecting the favorable interest rate environment. Investment management revenue increased $0.7 million, or 21.4%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, as compared to the same period last year, primarily attributable to an increase in estate and termination fees. Other non-interest income increased $425,000, or 25.3%, for the year as compared to the same period last year primarily due to increases in the fair market value adjustment on fair value hedges of interest rate lock commitments and forward sales agreements of $299,000 and commercial loan prepayment fees of $138,000, which was partially offset by increased losses in trading assets of $94,000 and a decrease in installment loan extension fees of $73,000.
Non-interest expenses, decreased by $27,000, or 0.2%, for the three months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to the same period in 2001. Non-interest expenses, excluding the securities impairment charge taken in the second quarter of 2002 of $4.4 million, decreased by $1.6 million, or 3.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to the same period in 2001. Non-interest expense, including the securities impairment charge, for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001 was $17.9 million and for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001 was $57.3 million and $51.3 million, respectively. Due to the non-amortization of goodwill, as discussed in the footnotes above, in 2002 the Companys non-interest expense improved by $665,000 and $2.0 million for the three and nine months periods, respectively, which were the respective amounts amortized in the 2001 periods. Salaries and employee benefits increased by $1.1 million, or 12.0%, and $2.7 million or 10.2%, for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively, due to additions to staff needed to support continued growth, employees merit increases, an increase in performance based incentive compensation, and commissions related to mortgage originations. Occupancy and equipment-related expense decreased by $0.4 million or 16.2% and $0.9 million or 12.3%, for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2002, respectively, largely attributable to branch relocation costs in 2001 and certain assets being fully depreciated in 2002. Other non-interest expenses increased by $0.1 million or 3.1% and $1.9 million or 15.5% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002, respectively, mainly due to increased costs associated with information technology consulting, executive recruitment costs and an unrealized loss recorded on an equity investment made for Community Reinvestment Act purposes.
22
The provision for loan losses represents the charge to expense that is required to maintain an adequate level of reserve for loan losses. Managements periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the reserve considers past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio, adverse situations which may affect the borrowers ability to repay, the estimated value of the underlying collateral, if any, and current and prospective economic conditions. Substantial portions of the Companys loans are secured by real estate in Massachusetts. Accordingly, the ultimate collectibility of a substantial portion of the Companys loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in property values within the state.
The provision for loan losses is based upon managements evaluation of the level of the reserve for loan losses required in relation to the estimate of loss exposure in the loan portfolio. An analysis of individual loans and the overall risk characteristics and size of the different loan portfolios is conducted on an ongoing basis. This managerial evaluation is reviewed periodically by a third-party loan review consultant. Accordingly, adjustments to the provision for loan losses are made as deemed necessary.
The provision for loan losses decreased to $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared with $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001. For the three months ended September 30, 2002, net loan charge-offs totaled $0.3 million, a decrease of $0.1 million from the same period last year. The provision for loan losses increased to $3.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared with $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, net loan charge-offs totaled $1.0 million, a decrease of $0.4 million from the same period last year. See the section on Reserve for Loan Losses for further discussion.
INCOME TAXES
The Company records income tax expense pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting For Income Taxes. The Company evaluates the deferred tax asset and the valuation reserve on a quarterly basis. The Companys effective tax rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 was 32.47% and 31.74%, respectively.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Total assets increased by $102.0 million or 4.6% from year-end 2001 to a total of $2.3 billion at September 30, 2002. Average assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased by $201.3 million or 9.9% from September 30, 2001. The ratio of equity to assets is 6.68% at September 31, 2002 and 6.06% at December 31, 2002.
Total loans increased by $85.6 million or 6.6% during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 as compared to total loans at December 31, 2001. The increases were mainly in residential, real estate construction and commercial real estate loans, which increased $33.3 million or 14.5%, $18.5 million or 39.1% and $9.0 million or 2.0%, respectively, and consumer loans which increased $25.1 million or 6.2%, which is primarily attributable to an increase in home equity loans.
Total deposits increased by $110.4 million or 7.0% since year-end 2001. Core deposits increased by $172.2 million or 16.5%, particularly in the relationship deposit products, which enabled the Company to reduce the balance of more expensive time deposits by $61.8 million 11.4%. Total borrowings decreased by $14.9 million, or 3.8%.
ASSET QUALITY
Non-performing assets are comprised of non-performing loans, non-performing investments and Other Real Estate Owned (OREO). Non-performing loans consist of loans that are more than 90 days past due but still accruing interest and non-accrual loans. Non-performing investments consists of investments that have been identified as other than temporarily impaired and are no longer accruing interest. OREO includes properties held by the Bank as a result of foreclosure or by acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. Non-performing assets totaled $3.7 million at September 30, 2002 (0.16% of total assets), as compared to the $3.0 million (0.14% of total assets) reported at December 31, 2001. The Companys total reserves for loan losses (including the credit quality discount of $0.6 million at September 30, 2002 and $0.8 million at December 31, 2001, which is discussed under Reserve for Loan Losses below), as a percentage of the loan portfolio was 1.55% at September 30, 2002 and 1.46% at December 31, 2001. The percentage of total reserves for loan losses (including the credit quality discount) to non-performing loans was 583.10% at September 30, 2002 compared to 630.18% at December 31, 2001. The Bank held no OREO property on September 30, 2002.
As permitted by banking regulations, consumer loans and home equity loans past due 90 days or more continue to accrue interest. In addition, certain commercial and real estate loans that are more than 90 days past due may be kept on an accruing status if the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. As a general rule, a commercial or real estate loan more than 90 days past due with respect to principal or interest is classified as a non-accrual loan. Income accruals are suspended on all non-accrual loans and all previously accrued and uncollected interest is reversed against current income. A loan remains on non-accrual status until it becomes current with respect to principal and interest, when the loan is liquidated, or when the loan is determined to be uncollectible and is charged-off against the reserve for loan losses.
24
The following table sets forth information regarding non-performing assets held by the Bank at the dates indicated.
Non-Performing Assets / Loans
(Dollars In Thousands)
As ofSeptember 30,2002
As ofDecember 31,2001
As ofSeptember 30,2001
Loans past due 90 days or more but still accruing
313
508
298
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis (1)
2,507
2,869
Total non-performing loans
3,674
3,015
3,167
Other real estate owned
Total non-performing assets
Restructured loans
605
503
511
Non-performing loans as a percent of gross loans
0.27
0.23
0.25
Non-performing assets as a percent of total assets
0.16
0.14
0.15
(1) Includes $99,000 of restructured non-accruing loans at September 30, 2002, and $100,000 of restructured non-accruing loans at December 31, 2001 and September 30, 2001.
In the course of resolving non-performing loans, the Bank may choose to restructure the contractual terms of certain commercial and real estate loans. Terms may be modified to fit the ability of the borrower to repay in line with its current financial status. It is the Banks policy to maintain restructured loans on non-accrual status for approximately six months before management considers its return to accrual status. At September 30, 2002, the Bank had $0.6 million of restructured loans.
Real estate acquired by the Bank through foreclosure proceedings or the acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure is classified as OREO. When property is acquired, it is recorded at the lesser of the loans remaining principal balance or the estimated fair value of the property acquired, less estimated costs to sell. Any loan balance in excess of the estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell on the date of transfer is charged to the reserve for loan losses on that date. All costs incurred thereafter in maintaining the property, as well as subsequent declines in fair value, are charged to non-interest expense.
Interest income that would have been recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, if non-performing loans at the respective dates had been performing in accordance with their original terms, approximated $225,000 and
$294,000, respectively. The actual amount of interest that was collected on these loans during each of those periods and included in interest income was approximately $26,000 and $23,000 respectively.
RESERVE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The provision for loan losses represents the charge to expense that is required to maintain an adequate level of reserve for loan losses. Managements periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the reserve considers past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio, adverse situations which may affect the borrowers ability to repay, the estimated value of the underlying collateral, if any, and current and prospective economic conditions. Substantial portions of the Banks loans are secured by real estate in Massachusetts. Accordingly, the ultimate collectibility of a substantial portion of the Banks loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in property values within the state.
As of September 30, 2002, the reserve for loan losses represented 1.50% of loans, as compared to 1.40% at December 31, 2001. The reserve for loan losses at September 30, 2002 was 567.12% of non-performing loans, as compared to 603.32% at December 31, 2001. As of September 30, 2002, the total reserve for loan losses (including the credit quality discount described below) represented 1.55% of loans, as compared to 1.46% at December 31, 2001. The total reserve for loan losses (including the credit quality discount) at September 30, 2002 represented 583.10% of non-performing loans, as compared to 630.18% at December 31, 2001.
The provision for loan losses is based upon Managements evaluation of the level of the reserve for loan losses in relation to the estimate of loss exposure in the loan portfolio. An analysis of individual loans and the overall risk characteristics and size of the different loan portfolios is conducted on an ongoing basis. This managerial evaluation is reviewed periodically by a third-party loan review consultant. As adjustments are identified, they are reported in the earnings of the period in which they become known.
While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the reserve may be necessary based on increases in non-performing loans, changes in economic conditions, or for other reasons. Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Banks reserve for loan losses. Federal Reserve regulators examined the Company in the first quarter of 2002 and the Bank was most recently examined by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, FDIC, in the fourth quarter of 2001. No additional provision for loan losses was required as a result of these examinations.
The reserve for loan losses is maintained at a level that management considers adequate to provide for potential loan losses based upon an evaluation of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. The reserve is increased by provisions for loan losses and by recoveries of loans previously charged-off and reduced by loans charged-off. In 2000, the Bank established a separate credit quality discount as a reduction of the loan balances acquired from FleetBoston Financial. Credit quality discount is a separate reserve that was established for the acquired loan balances. The credit quality discount is amortized over the remaining average life of the loans purchased and amortized into interest income proportionately with the loan balances. The level of credit quality discount was $0.6 million at September 30, 2002 and $0.8 million at December 31, 2001. Including the credit quality
26
discount, the total reserves for loan losses was $21.4 million at September 30, 2002, compared to $19.0 million at December 31, 2001.
27
The following table summarizes changes in the reserve for loan losses and other selected statistics for the periods presented:
Reserve For Loan Losses
(Dollars in Thousands)
Quarter-To-Date
September 30,2001
Average total loans
1,329,834
1,303,802
1,293,852
Reserve for loan losses, at beginning of period
19,953
19,080
18,190
16,937
16,115
Charged-off loans:
48
85
Real estate - Residential
463
507
491
83
125
67
98
144
Total charged-off loans
541
636
601
674
635
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off:
142
219
209
(7
55
Real estate - Commercial
58
72
52
82
80
29
Total recoveries
309
291
184
Net loans charged-off
317
327
310
579
451
1,832
Reserve for loan losses, end of period
20,836
Credit quality discount on acquired loans
587
705
765
810
1,113
Total reserves for loan losses, end of period
21,423
20,658
19,845
19,000
18,050
Net loans charged-off as a percent of average total loans
Reserve for loan losses as a percent of total loans
1.50
1.48
1.45
1.40
1.31
Reserve for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans
567.12
672.27
573.32
603.32
534.80
Total reserves for loan losses as a percent of total loans (including credit quality discount)
1.55
1.54
1.51
1.46
Total reserve for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans (including credit quality discount)
583.10
696.02
596.30
630.18
569.94
Net loans charged-off as a percent of reserve for loan losses
1.52
1.64
1.62
3.18
2.66
Recoveries as a percent of charge-offs
41.40
48.58
48.42
14.09
28.98
28
The reserve for loan losses is allocated to various loan categories as part of the Banks process of evaluating its adequacy. Allocated reserves were $16.3 million at September 30, 2002, up from $15.2 million at December 31, 2001. The distribution of reserves allocated among the various loan categories changed slightly compared to the distribution as of December 31, 2001. Increases were noted in the Commercial & Industrial (C&I), the Real Estate Commercial, the Real Estate Construction and the Installment loan type categories. The increases in these categories are attributed to portfolio growth as well as recent assessments of the loan portfolio.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the allowance for loan losses for the dates indicated:
Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
(Dollars - In Thousands)
AT SEPTEMBER 30,2002
AT DECEMBER 31,2001
ReserveAmount
CreditQualityDiscount
LoansIn CategoryTo Total Loans
Allocated Allowances:
3,401
10.9
3,036
11.7
Real Estate - Commercial
7,309
483
34.1
6,751
634
35.6
Real Estate - Construction
1,310
4.7
1,140
3.6
Real Estate - Residential
594
19.0
355
17.6
3,075
90
24.0
3,141
143
25.0
643
7.3
727
6.5
Non-Specific Allowance
4,504
NA
3,040
Total Allowance for Loan Losses
100.0
A portion of the reserve for loan losses is not allocated to any specific segment of the loan portfolio. This non-specific allowance is maintained for two primary reasons: (a.) there exists an inherent subjectivity and imprecision to the analytical processes employed and (b.) the prevailing business environment, as it is affected by changing economic conditions and various exogenous factors, may impact the portfolio in ways currently unforeseen.
Moreover, management has identified certain risk factors, which are not readily quantifiable, but which could still impact the degree of loss sustained within the portfolio. These include: (a.) market risk factors, such as the effects of economic variability on the entire portfolio, and (b.) unique portfolio risk factors that are inherent characteristics of the Banks loan portfolio. Market risk factors may consist of changes to general economic and business conditions that may impact the Banks loan portfolio customer base in terms of ability to repay and that may result in changes in value of underlying collateral. Unique portfolio risk factors may include industry concentration or covariant industry concentrations, geographic concentrations, or trends that may exacerbate losses resulting from economic events which the Bank may not be able to fully diversify out of its portfolio.
Due to the imprecise nature of the loan loss estimation process and ever changing conditions, these risk attributes may not be adequately captured in data related to the formula-based loan loss components used to determine allocations in the Banks analysis of the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management, therefore, has established and maintains a non-specific allowance for loan losses. The amount of non-specific allowance was $4.5 million at September 30, 2002, compared to $3.0 million at December 31, 2001.
Management increased the non-specific, unallocated portion of the loan loss reserve by approximately $1.5 million to $4.5 million at September 30, 2002 primarily based upon concerns over how the overall weakening of the national economy is affecting borrowers in its loan portfolio. As 2001 drew to a close, empirical evidence indicated that the nation had entered a recession. Through the nine months ending September 30, 2002, however, the national economic slowdown had not yet had any apparent significant effect on the overall credit quality or incidence of default within the Banks loan portfolio. Management, nonetheless, increased the non-specific portion of the loan loss reserve by $1.5 million, as of September 30, 2002, based upon its belief that the Bank's retail and commercial customers may experience a weakening of their credit quality as a lagging recessionary effect.
As of September 30, 2002, the reserve for loan losses totaled $20.8 million as compared to $18.2 million at December 31, 2001. Based on the analyses described above, management believes that the level of the reserve for loan losses at September 30, 2002 is adequate.
MINORITY INTEREST
In May of 1997, Independent Capital Trust I (the Trust I) was formed for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities (the Trust I Preferred Securities) and investing the proceeds of the sale of these securities in junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company. A total of $28.75 million of 9.28% Trust I Preferred Securities were issued and were scheduled to mature in 2027, callable at the option of the Company on May 20, 2002. On May 20, 2002, the Company exercised its option and called the Trust I Preferred Securities.
On January 31, 2000, Independent Capital Trust II (the Trust II) was formed for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities (the Trust II Preferred Securities) and investing the proceeds of the sale of these securities in junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company. A total of $25 million of 11% Trust II Preferred Securities were issued and were scheduled to mature in 2030, callable at the option of the Company on or after January 31, 2002. On January 31, 2002, the Company exercised its option and called the Trust II Preferred Securities.
On December 11, 2001, Independent Capital Trust III (the Trust III) was formed for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities (the Trust III Preferred Securities) and investing the proceeds of the sale of these securities in $25.8 million of 8.625% junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company. A total of $25 million of 8.625% Trust III Preferred Securities were issued by Trust III and are scheduled to mature in 2031, callable at the option of the Company on or after December 31, 2006. Distributions on these securities are payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of March, June, September and December, such distributions can be deferred at the option of the Company for up to five years. The Trust III Preferred Securities can be prepaid in whole or in part on or after December 31, 2006 at a redemption price equal to $25 per Trust III Preferred Security plus accumulated but unpaid distributions thereon to the date of the redemption. On December 11, 2001, Trust III also issued $0.8 million in common securities to the Company. The net proceeds of the Trust III issuance were used to redeem the Trust II securities on January 31, 2002. Thereafter, Trust II was liquidated.
On April 12, 2002, Independent Capital Trust IV (the Trust IV) was formed for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities (the Trust IV Preferred Securities) and investing the proceeds of the sale of these securities in $25.8 million of 8.375% junior subordinated debentures issued by the Company. A total of $25 million of 8.375% Trust IV Preferred Securities were issued by Trust IV and are scheduled to mature in 2032, callable at the option of the Company on or after April 30, 2007. Distributions on these securities are payable quarterly in arrears on the last day of March, June, September and December, such distributions can be deferred at the option of the Company for up to five years. The Trust IV Preferred Securities can be prepaid in whole or in part on or after April 30, 2007 at a redemption price equal to $25 per Trust IV Preferred Security plus accumulated but unpaid distributions thereon to the date of the redemption. On April 12, 2002, Trust IV also issued $0.8 million in common securities to the Company. The net proceeds of the Trust IV issuance were used to redeem the Trust I securities on May 20, 2002. Thereafter, Trust I was liquidated.
The Trust I, Trust II, Trust III and Trust IV Preferred Securities are presented in the consolidated balance sheets of the Company entitled Corporation-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Trust Preferred Securities of Subsidiary Trusts Holding Solely Junior Subordinated Debentures of the Corporation. The Company records distributions payable on the Trust I, Trust II, Trust III and Trust IV Preferred Securities as minority interest expense in its consolidated statements of income. The minority interest expense was $4.0 million and $4.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
In September, the Companys Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.54 and $0.52 per share to stockholders of record of Trust III and Trust IV, respectively, as of the close of business on September 27, 2002. The dividend was paid on September 30, 2002.
ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
The principal objective of the Companys asset/liability management strategy is to reduce the vulnerability of the Companys earnings to changes in interest rates. This is accomplished by managing the volume of assets and liabilities maturing, or subject to repricing, and by adjusting rates in relation to market conditions to influence volumes and spreads.
The effect of interest rate volatility on net interest income is minimized when the interest sensitivity gap (the difference between assets and liabilities that reprice within a given time period) is the smallest. Given the inherent uncertainty of future interest rates, the Banks Asset/Liability Management Committee evaluates the interest sensitivity gap and executes strategies, which may include off-balance sheet activities, in an effort to minimize the Companys exposure to interest rate movements while providing adequate earnings in the most plausible future interest rate environments.
31
INTEREST RATE RISK
Interest rate risk is the sensitivity of income to variations in interest rates over both short-term and long-term horizons. The primary goal of interest-rate risk management is to control this risk within limits approved by the Board. These limits reflect the Companys tolerance for interest-rate risk by identifying exposures, quantifying and hedging them as needed. The Company quantifies its interest-rate exposures using net interest income simulation models, as well as simpler gap analyses, and Economic Value of Equity (EVE) analysis. The Company manages its interest-rate exposure using a combination of on and off-balance sheet instruments, primarily fixed rate portfolio securities, interest rate swaps, and options.
The Company uses simulation analysis to measure the exposure of net interest income to changes in interest rates over a relatively short time horizon. Simulation analysis involves projecting future interest income and expense from the Companys assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet positions under various scenarios.
Management reviews simulation results to ensure the exposure of net interest income to changes in interest rates remains within established limits. The following table reflects the Companys estimated exposure, as a percentage of estimated net interest income for the next 12 months as of September 30, 2002. Interest rates are assumed to shift upward by 200 basis points or downward by 100 basis points. This asymmetric rate shift reflects the fact that interest rates as of September 30, 2002 are at extremely low levels. The likelihood of a 200 basis point decline is remote.
Rate Change(Basis Points)
Estimated Exposure as %of Net Interest Income
+200
(1.01
)%
-100
(0.43
As a component of its asset/liability management activities intended to control interest rate exposure, the Bank, enters into certain off-balance sheet hedging transactions. From time to time, the Bank has utilized interest rate swap agreements as hedging instruments against stable or declining interest rates. An interest rate swap is an agreement whereby one party agrees to pay a floating rate of interest on a notional principal amount in exchange for receiving a fixed rate of interest on the same notional amount for a predetermined period of time from a second party. The assets relating to the notional principal amount are not actually exchanged.
On September 30, 2002, the Company had interest rate swap commitments with a total notional amount of $50.0 million, which will hedge future LIBOR based borrowings. The fair value of these commitments at September 30, 2002 is ($272,000). Under these swap commitments, the Company pays a fixed rate of 3.65% and receives 3 month LIBOR. These interest rate swaps meet the criteria for cash flow hedges. All changes in the fair value are recorded as other comprehensive income.
At December 31, 2001, the Company had interest rate swap commitments with a total notional value of $125.0 million, of which $100.0 million qualified as a cash flow hedge and the remaining $25.0 million qualified as a fair value hedge. The fair value of these commitments at December 31, 2001 was $2.0 million. The Company was receiving weighted average fixed
32
rate payments of 7.61% and paying weighted average variable payments of 4.31% at December 31, 2001.
To improve the Companys asset sensitivity, the Company sold interest rate swaps hedged against prime based loans during the third quarter ending September 30, 2002. The interest rate swaps had total notional amounts of $75.0 million resulting in total deferred gains of $5.8 million. These swaps were accounted for as cash flow hedges and therefore the deferred gains will be amortized into interest income over the remaining life of the swaps, which range between two and five years. During the nine months ending September 30, 2002, the Company sold interest rate swaps, with total notional amounts of $175.0 million, resulting in total deferred gains of $6.5 million. The deferred gains will be amortized into interest income over the remaining life of the swaps, which range between two and five years.
Additionally, the Company enters into commitments to fund residential mortgage loans with the intention of selling them in the secondary markets. The Company also enters into forward sales agreements for certain funded loans and loan commitments to protect against change in interest rates. At September 30, 2002 the Company had residential mortgage loan commitments of $46.1 million and forward sales agreements of $47.7 million. At December 31, 2001 the Company had residential mortgage loan commitments of $14.7 million and forward sales agreements of $16.7 million.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
Liquidity, as it pertains to the Company, is the ability to generate cash in the most economical way, in order to meet ongoing obligations to pay deposit withdrawals and to fund loan commitments. The Companys primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings, and the amortization, prepayment, and maturities of loans and investments.
A strong source of liquidity is the Companys core deposits, those deposits which management considers, based on experience, not likely to be withdrawn in the near term. The Company utilizes its extensive branch-banking network to attract retail customers who provide a stable source of core deposits. In addition, the Company has established repurchase agreements with major brokerage firms as potential sources of liquidity. On September 30, 2002, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under these agreements. As an additional source of funds, the Bank has entered into repurchase agreements with customers totaling $75.4 million at September 30, 2002. In addition, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank, Rockland has access to approximately $638.1 million of borrowing capacity. At September 30, 2002, the Company had $293.6 million outstanding under such lines. The Company actively manages its liquidity position under the direction of the Banks Asset/Liability Management Committee. Periodic review under formal policies and procedures is intended to ensure that the Company will maintain access to adequate levels of available funds. At September 30, 2002, the Companys liquidity position was well above policy guidelines.
33
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND DIVIDENDS
The Company and Rockland are subject to capital requirements established by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC, respectively. One key measure of capital adequacy is the risk-based ratio for which the regulatory agencies have established minimum requirements of 4.00% for Tier 1 risk-based capital and 8.00% for Total risk-based capital. As of September 30, 2002, the Company had a Tier 1 risked-based capital ratio of 10.10% and a Total risked-based capital ratio of 11.54%. Rockland had a Tier 1 risked-based capital ratio of 9.99% and a total risked-based capital ratio of 11.24% as of the same date.
An additional capital requirement of a minimum 4.00% Tier 1 leverage capital is mandated by the regulatory agencies for most banking organizations and a 5.00% Tier 1 leverage capital ratio is required for a well capitalized institution. As of September 30, 2002, the Company and the Bank had Tier 1 leverage capital ratios of 6.90% and 6.82%, respectively.
In September, the Companys Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $.12 per share to stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 27, 2002. This dividend was paid on October 11, 2002. On an annualized basis, the dividend payout ratio amounted to 31.61% of the trailing four quarters earnings.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
The preceding Managements Discussion and Analysis and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10Q contain certain forward-looking statements, including without limitation, statements regarding (i) the level of reserve for loan losses, (ii) the rate of delinquencies and amounts of charge-offs, (iii) the rates of loan growth. Moreover, the Company may from time to time, in both written reports and oral statements by Company management, express its expectations regarding future performance of the Company. These forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and actual results may differ from Company expectations. The following factors, which, among others, could impact current and future performance include but are not limited to: (i) adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses; (ii) adverse changes in the economy of the New England region, the Companys primary market, (iii) adverse changes in the local real estate market, as most of the Companys loans are concentrated in Southeastern Massachusetts and a substantial portion of these loans have real estate as collateral; (iv) fluctuations in market rates and prices which can negatively affect net interest margin asset valuations and expense expectations; and (v) changes in regulatory requirements of federal and state agencies applicable to banks and bank holding companies, such as the Company and Rockland, which could have materially adverse effects on the Companys future operating results. When relying on forward-looking statements to make decisions with respect to the Company, investors and others are cautioned to consider these and other risks and uncertainties.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Information required by this Item 3 is included in Item 2 of Part I of this Form 10-Q, entitled Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer along with the Companys Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer along with the Companys Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Companys periodic Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors which could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out its evaluation.
Disclosure controls and procedures are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company expects that the federal judge presiding over the pending case known as Rockland Trust Company v. Computer Associates International, Inc., United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts Civil Action No. 95-11683-DPW, will issue a final trial court decision, in the form of Findings Of Fact and Conclusions Of Law, sometime soon. The case arises from a 1991 License Agreement (the Agreement) between the Bank and Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA) for an integrated system of banking software products.
In July 1995 the Bank filed a Complaint against CA in federal court in Boston which asserted claims for breach of the Agreement, breach of express warranty, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, and for unfair and deceptive practices in
violation of section 11 of Chapter 93A of the Massachusetts General Laws (the 93A Claim). The Bank is seeking damages of at least $1.23 million from CA. Under Massachusettss law, interest will be computed at a 12% rate on any damages, which the Bank recovers, either from the date of breach or the date on which the case was filed. If the Bank prevails on the 93A Claim, it shall be entitled to recover its attorney fees and costs and may also recover double or triple damages. CA asserted a Counterclaim against the Bank for breach of the Agreement. CA seeks to recover damages of at least $1.1 million from the Bank, plus interest at a rate as high as 24% pursuant to the Agreement.
The non-jury trial of the case was conducted in January 2001. The trial concluded with post-trial submissions to and argument before the Court in February 2001. The Company has considered the potential impact of this case, and all cases pending in the normal course of business, when preparing its financial statements. While the trial court decision may affect the Companys financial results for the quarter in which the decision is rendered in either a favorable or unfavorable manner, the final outcome of this case will not likely have any material, long-term impact on the Companys financial condition.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds - None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities - None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders - None
Item 5. Other Information - None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Reports on Form 8-K
July 11, 2002 related to second quarter 2002 earnings release.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
(registrant)
Date:
November 14, 2002
/s/ Douglas H. Philipsen
Douglas H. Philipsen
President, Chairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
/s/ Denis K. Sheahan
Denis K. Sheahan
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial andPrincipal Accounting Officer)
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Denis K. Sheahan, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Independent Bank Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which, the periodic report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and
(c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and to the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 14, 2002
/s/Denis K. Sheahan
Chief Financial Officer
I, Douglas H. Philipsen, certify that:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the periodic report is being prepared;
/s/Douglas H. Philipsen
Chief Executive Officer
39