During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, the Luxembourg tax authorities challenged our tax position with respect to a royalties-related tax exemption and, in response, we filed a petition to defend our position. In response to our petition, the Luxembourg tax authorities accepted our tax position and permitted the tax exemption, issuing a revised tax assessment on June 17, 2020.
During the audit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the execution and review of complex accounting matters. Due to a failure in procedures with respect to the execution, review, supervision and monitoring of complex accounting matters, a number of adjustments were identified and made to the consolidated financial statements during the course of our audit.
One of the Continuing Business Entities, DGS Limited, entered into a “Profit Share Agreement” dated as of June 30, 2017 with Mr. Cox whereby, in exchange for his services as chief executive officer of that entity, Mr. Cox received 13.9% of any cash dividends paid by DGS Limited to us. Mr. Cox was paid $0.2 million under that agreement, which expired by its terms on June 30, 2018. The parties entered into a new Profit Share Agreement, effective as of June 30, 2019, whereby in exchange for his services as chief executive officer of DGS Limited, Mr. Cox received a fee equal to 16.18% of any cash dividends paid by DGS Limited to us. Mr. Cox was paid $0.1 million under the Profit Share Agreement, which expired by its terms on June 30, 2020.
Reseller commissions and lead expenses were $17.3 million in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, a decrease of $10.5 million, or 37.8%, compared to the same period in 2019, primarily as a result of an improvement in operational efficiencies resulting from an increase in sales conversion rates ($3.7 million) and our choice to exit an unprofitable contract towards the end of fiscal year 2019 ($6.8 million).
Depreciation and amortization expense was $24.5 million in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, an increase of $3.6 million, or 17.1%, compared to the same period in 2019. The increase in depreciation and amortization was due to an increase in depreciation expense of right-of-use assets by $2.0 million and $1.6 million increase in depreciation of other asses primarily due to facilities expansion.
We define “adjusted net income / (loss) from continuing operations” as net income / (loss) for the year, less discontinued operation, net of tax, before the effect of the following items: non-recurring expenses (including litigation and settlement expenses, costs related to COVID-19, and expenses related to our initial public offering), impairment, other income, fair value adjustment related to the Amazon warrant, share-based payments, and foreign exchange gains or losses, net of the tax effect of such adjustments. We believe these items are not reflective of our long-term performance. We use adjusted net income / (loss) from continuing operations internally to understand what we believe to be the recurring nature of our net income / (loss) from continuing operations. We also believe that adjusted net income / (loss) from continuing operations is widely used by investors, securities analysts and other interested parties as a supplemental measure of profitability.
The following table provides a reconciliation of Adjusted net income / (loss) from continuing operations to net income / (loss) for the years presented:
We define “EBITDA” as net income / (loss) for the year, less discontinued operation, net of tax, before finance expenses (including finance costs related to lease liabilities), depreciation and amortization (including depreciation of right-of-use assets), and income tax expense / (benefit). We define “Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations” as EBITDA before the effect of the following items: litigation and settlement expenses, foreign exchange losses, goodwill impairment, other income, phantom expense and share-based payments. We use Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations internally to establish forecasts, budgets and operational goals to manage and monitor our business, as well as evaluate our underlying historical performance. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations is a meaningful indicator of the health of our business as it reflects our ability to generate cash that can be used to fund recurring capital expenditures and growth. Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations also disregards non-cash or non-recurring charges that we believe are not reflective of our long-term performance. We also believe that Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations is widely used by investors, securities analysts and other interested parties as a supplemental measure of performance and liquidity.
We calculate “Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations margin” as Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations divided by revenue. Our Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations margin for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018 was 13.4%, 9.9%, and 1.3%, respectively. The increase in Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations margin was primarily driven by improving performance in net income / (loss) from continuing operations during the three-year period ended June 30, 2020. The key drivers of this improvement were the following: (a) geographic mix improved where our more profitable nearshore and offshore operations continued to grow as a percentage of the overall business, (b) scale was achieved in our nearshore operations where we began to see target flow-through margins materialize as the business hit critical mass, (c) capacity utilization increased as we grew our revenue and agents in our nearshore and offshore operations while reducing our U.S. footprint, (d) disciplined operational execution, (e) the increase of our more profitable non-voice business, and (f) margin improvement in our digital business.
Net cash inflow from operating activities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 was $51.7 million compared with net cash inflow of $2.2 million during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. The increase in net cash inflow from operating activities was primarily attributable to the increase in net income before taxation of $10.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 and to the accelerated collection of receivables towards the end of the quarter ended December 31, 2019.
Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2020. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2020, due to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the execution and review of complex accounting matters. Notwithstanding the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described below, our management concluded that our consolidated financial statements in this annual report present fairly, in all material respects, the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods presented, in conformity with IFRS as issued by the IASB.
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified one material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to our estimate of renewable revenue and related provision for Etelequote Limited. Specifically, corporate financial management review controls failed in estimating Etelequote Limited renewable receivable revenue, which is complex and requires a high level of judgment under IFRS 15. As a result of our management review controls failure, we recorded adjustments of $1.9 million (before tax), increasing our estimated renewable receivable revenue in the statement of comprehensive income and loss and renewable receivable in the statement of financial position as of June 30, 2019. During the preparation of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2019 and for the nine month periods ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, we and our independent registered public accounting firm again identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting related to our estimate of renewable revenue and related provision, and related tax effects, for Etelequote Limited for the nine month period ended March 31, 2019. Specifically, corporate financial management review controls failed in estimating Etelequote Limited renewable receivable revenue, which is complex and requires a high level of judgment under IFRS 15. As a result of our management review controls failure, we recorded adjustments of $7.0 million (before tax), increasing our estimated renewable receivable revenue in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income (included in Net income for the period, discontinued operations, net of tax) for the nine month period ended March 31, 2019 and renewable receivable in the statement of financial position as of March 31, 2019. As of June 30, 2020, we and our independent registered public accounting firm determined that this material weakness was remediated, due to the disposal of Etelequote Limited at the end of June 2019.
As an emerging growth company, we have taken, and are taking, actions to remediate the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. Key elements of the remediation effort made and being made, include, but are not limited to, the following initiatives:
“Audit Fees” are the aggregate fees for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and annual statutory financial statements, reviews of interim financial statements, review of our registration statement, and related consents.
“Audit-related Fees” are the aggregate fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit and are not reported under Audit Fees.
“Tax Fees” are the aggregate fees for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning related services.
“Other Fees” are any additional amounts for products and services provided by the principal accountant.
There were no “Audit-related Fees,” “Tax Fees,” or “Other Fees” during the fiscal years 2020 or 2019.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Shareholders and Board of Directors
Ibex Limited
Hamilton, Bermuda
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Ibex Limited (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at June 30, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2020, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ BDO LLP
The lease liability is measured at the present value of the lease payments discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease. If the implicit rate cannot be readily determined, the Group uses an incremental borrowing rate specific to the country, term and currency of the contract.