McDonaldโs Corporation is an American operator and franchisor of fast food restaurants represented worldwide and the biggest fast food company in the world.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-5231
McDONALDS CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
McDonalds Plaza
Oak Brook, Illinois
(630) 623-3000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
1,250,048,706
(Number of shares of common stock
outstanding as of June 30, 2005)
INDEX
The following trademarks used herein are the
property of McDonalds Corporation and its
affiliates or the Company: Boston Market,
Chipotle Mexican Grill and McDonalds.
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
Assets
Current assets
Cash and equivalents
Accounts and notes receivable
Inventories, at cost, not in excess of market
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Total current assets
Other assets
Investments in and advances to affiliates
Goodwill, net
Miscellaneous
Total other assets
Property and equipment
Property and equipment, at cost
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
Net property and equipment
Total assets
Liabilities and shareholders equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable
Income taxes
Other taxes
Accrued interest
Accrued payroll and other liabilities
Current maturities of long-term debt
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt
Other long-term liabilities
Deferred income taxes
Shareholders equity
Preferred stock, no par value; authorized 165.0 million shares; issued none
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 3.5 billion shares; issued 1,660.6 million shares
Additional paid-in capital
Unearned ESOP compensation
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Common stock in treasury, at cost; 410.6 and 390.7 million shares
Total shareholders equity
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
See notes to condensed Consolidated financial statements.
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
Revenues
Sales by Company-operated restaurants
Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants
Total revenues
Operating costs and expenses
Company-operated restaurant expenses
Franchised restaurants occupancy expenses
Selling, general & administrative expenses
Other operating expense, net
Total operating costs and expenses
Interest expense
Nonoperating (income) expense, net
Income before provision for income taxes
Net income
Net income per common share
Weighted average shares
Weighted average sharesdiluted
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
Operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operations
Noncash charges and credits:
Depreciation and amortization
Income taxes audit benefit
Share-based compensation
Other
Changes in working capital items
Cash provided by operations
Investing activities
Property and equipment expenditures
Purchases and sales of restaurant businesses and sales of property
Cash used for investing activities
Financing activities
Notes payable and long-term financing issuances and repayments
Treasury stock purchases
Proceeds from stock option exercises
Cash used for financing activities
Cash and equivalents increase (decrease)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and equivalents at end of period
5
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed Consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated financial statements contained in the Companys December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005 do not necessarily indicate the results that may be expected for the full year.
The results of operations of restaurant businesses purchased and sold were not material to the condensed Consolidated financial statements for periods prior to purchase and sale.
Comprehensive Income
The following table presents the components of comprehensive income for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments
Deferred hedging adjustments
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
Total comprehensive income
Per Common Share Information
Diluted net income per common share is calculated using net income divided by diluted weighted-average shares. Diluted weighted-average shares include weighted-average shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of share-based employee compensation, calculated using the treasury stock method, of 10.2 million shares and 12.0 million shares for the second quarter 2005 and 2004, respectively, and 15.5 million shares and 12.8 million shares for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Stock options that were not included in diluted weighted-average shares because they would have been antidilutive were 48.1 million shares and 89.7 million shares for the second quarter 2005 and 2004, respectively, and 46.5 million shares and 94.3 million shares for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Share-based Compensation
Prior to January 1, 2005, the Company accounted for the plans under the measurement and recognition provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Accordingly, share-based compensation was included as a pro forma disclosure in the financial statement footnotes.
Effective January 1, 2005, the Company early adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123(R)), using the modified-prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost in 2005 includes the portion vesting in the period for (1) all share-based payments granted prior to, but not vested as of January 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of FASB Statement No. 123 and (2) all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R). Results for prior periods have not been restated.
6
In 2005, in connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company adjusted the mix of employee long-term incentive compensation by reducing stock options awarded and increasing certain cash-based compensation (primarily annual incentive-based compensation) and other equity-based awards. Second quarter 2005 results included pretax expense of $45.1 million ($30.2 million after tax or $0.02 per share) of which $35.8 million related to share-based compensation (stock options and RSUs) and $9.3 million related to the shift of a portion of share-based compensation to cash-based. For the six months 2005, results included pretax expense of $102.5 million ($68.5 million after tax or $0.05 per share) of which $83.9 million related to share-based compensation and $18.6 million related to the compensation shift. Compensation expense related to share-based awards is generally amortized over the vesting period in selling, general & administrative expenses in the Consolidated statement of income. As of June 30, 2005, there was $246.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company presented all benefits of tax deductions resulting from the exercise of share-based compensation as operating cash flows in the Statement of cash flows. SFAS No. 123(R) requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows. Results included $4.9 million for second quarter 2005 and $18.9 million for the six months 2005 of excess tax benefits as a financing cash inflow.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123 to options granted under the Companys stock options plans in second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2004.
Net income, as reported
Add: Total share-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects
Deduct: Total share-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all rewards, net of related tax effects
Pro forma net income
Net income per share:
As reported basic
Pro forma basic
As reported diluted
Pro forma diluted
Segment Information
The Company primarily operates and franchises McDonalds restaurants in the food service industry. In addition, the Company operates certain non-McDonalds brands that are not material to the Companys overall results.
The following table presents the Companys revenues and operating income by geographic segment. The APMEA segment represents McDonalds restaurant operations in Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa. The Other segment represents non-McDonalds brands.
7
U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Latin America
Canada
Operating income (loss) (1)
Corporate
Total operating income
8
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Description of the Business
The Company primarily operates and franchises McDonalds restaurants. In addition, the Company operates certain non-McDonalds brands that are not material to the Companys overall results. Of the more than 30,000 McDonalds restaurants in over 100 countries, more than 8,000 are operated by the Company, approximately 18,000 are operated by franchisees/licensees and about 4,000 are operated by affiliates. In general, the Company owns the land and building or secures long-term leases for restaurant sites regardless of who operates the restaurant. This ensures long-term occupancy rights and helps control related costs.
Revenues consist of sales by Company-operated restaurants and fees from restaurants operated by franchisees and affiliates. These fees primarily include rent, service fees and/or royalties that are based on a percent of sales, with specified minimum rent payments. Fees vary by type of site, amount of Company investment and local business conditions. These fees, along with occupancy and operating rights, are stipulated in franchise/license agreements that generally have 20-year terms.
The business is managed as distinct geographic segments: United States; Europe; Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa (APMEA); Latin America and Canada. In addition, throughout this report we present a segment entitled Other that includes non-McDonalds brands (e.g., Boston Market and Chipotle Mexican Grill). The U.S. and Europe segments account for approximately 70% of total revenues.
Strategic Direction and Financial Performance
In 2003, the Company introduced a comprehensive revitalization plan to increase McDonalds relevance to todays consumers as well as improve our financial discipline. We redefined our strategy to emphasize growth through adding more customers to existing restaurants and aligned the System around our customer-focused Plan to Win. The near-term goal of our revitalization plan was to fortify the foundation of our business. This was substantially achieved by year-end 2004.
Over the past two years, we have also exercised increased financial discipline; we paid down debt, reduced capital expenditures and reduced selling, general & administrative expenses as a percent of revenues. In addition, we returned a significant amount of excess cash to shareholders in the form of dividends and share repurchases.
For each quarter of 2004, McDonalds increased customer visits, improved margins and delivered double-digit growth in operating income and earnings per share. In addition, comparable sales were positive across all geographic segments during each and every quarter.
The Company continued this positive momentum for the first six months in 2005 with solid revenue and operating income growth, on top of last years double digit growth. These results were driven by positive global comparable sales and the continued strength of our U.S. business.
For the second quarter and six months, the U.S. achieved positive comparable sales every month and revenues also increased, driven by multiple complementary initiatives that delivered compelling value, menu variety and added convenience to our customers.
In Europe, although we continue to face challenges in a few of our key markets, our ongoing emphasis on striking the right balance between branded everyday affordability, premium product selections and core menu offerings generated increased customer visits during the second quarter. To strengthen the segments performance, our European leadership team is committed to initiatives that will deliver an outstanding customer experience and generate further improvements in this critical area of the world.
9
In APMEA, Australias strong second quarter results were partly offset by weak performance in Japan and China. To broaden our success across the segment, we continue to develop our value and new product initiatives in several markets, including Japan and China. We expect these initiatives to enhance our consumer appeal and drive improved results for the region.
During the second quarter 2005, the Company decided to take advantage of the one-time opportunity under the Homeland Investment Act to reduce future taxes by repatriating in 2005 approximately $3.2 billion of historical foreign earnings. This resulted in $112 million of tax expense that was recognized in the second quarter. During the fourth quarter of 2005, we expect certain markets will increase local borrowings to fund the majority of the repatriation. The result will be a temporary increase in cash and debt levels on our Consolidated balance sheet at year end. The increase is temporary and does not signal any change in our financial discipline in 2005 or in years to come.
The long-term goal of our revitalization plan is to create a differentiated customer experience one that builds brand loyalty and delivers sustainable, profitable growth for shareholders. Looking forward, consistent with that goal, we are targeting average annual Systemwide sales and revenue growth of 3% to 5%, average annual operating income growth of 6% to 7%, and annual returns on incremental invested capital in the high teens. These targets exclude the impact of foreign currency translation.
Operating Highlights Included:
Outlook
10
be the same as it would have been excluding this one-time opportunity. The Company expects interest expense in 2005 to remain relatively flat compared with 2004, based on the current interest and foreign currency exchange rates as most of the activity related to the Homeland Investment Act will take place later in the year. We expect the temporary increase in cash and debt to be eliminated as we pay down debt in 2006 and early 2007.
The Following Definitions Apply to These Terms as Used Throughout This Form 10-Q:
Forward-Looking Statements
A number of factors can affect our business, including the effectiveness of operating initiatives and changes in global and local business and economic conditions. These and other risks are noted in the Forward-Looking Statements at the end of Managements Discussion and Analysis.
11
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS
Operating income
Provision for income taxes
Net income per common sharediluted
n/m Not meaningful
12
Net Income and Diluted Net Income per Common Share
For the quarter, net income and diluted net income per common share were $530.4 million and $0.42, respectively. The 2005 results included $112.0 million or $0.09 per share of incremental tax expense resulting from the decision to repatriate approximately $3.2 billion in foreign earnings under the Homeland Investment Act, and pretax expense of $45.1 million or $0.02 per share due to share-based and related compensation. Second quarter 2004 diluted net income per common share was $0.47, excluding a pro forma expense of $0.03 per share related to share-based compensation.
For the six months, net income and diluted net income per common share were $1,258.3 million and $0.98, respectively. The 2005 results included the $112.0 million and $0.09 per share of incremental tax expense, a $178.8 million or $0.13 per share benefit primarily due to a favorable audit settlement of the Companys 2000-2002 U.S. tax returns in the first quarter and pretax expense of $102.5 million or $0.05 per share due to share-based and related compensation. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, diluted net income per common share was $0.87 excluding a pro forma expense of $0.06 per share related to share-based compensation.
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the second quarter were relatively flat due to higher weighted average shares outstanding, offset by a less dilutive effect of outstanding stock options.
For the six months, diluted weighted average shares outstanding increased due to higher weighted average shares outstanding and a more dilutive effect of outstanding stock options.
During the quarter and six months, the Company repurchased $0.6 billion or 20.1 million shares and $1.0 billion or 33.6 million shares of its common stock, respectively.
Accounting Change
Effective January 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), although not required to do so until 2006. This new accounting standard requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. The Company adopted this accounting using the modified-prospective transition method. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company, like most other U.S. companies, accounted for share-based payments to employees under APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. Accordingly, share-based compensation was included as pro forma disclosure in the financial statement footnotes. The Companys second quarter and six months 2004 pro forma earnings, as reported in Form 10-Q, included $0.03 and $0.06 per share of share-based compensation expense, respectively.
In 2005, in connection with its adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company adjusted the mix of employee long-term incentive compensation by reducing stock options awarded and increasing certain cash-based incentives and other equity based awards. Second quarter 2005 results included pretax expense of $45.1 million (or $0.02 per share) of which $35.8 million related to share-based compensation, stock options and RSUs and $9.3 million related to the shift of a portion of share-based compensation to primarily cash-based incentive compensation. For the six months 2005, results included pretax expense of $102.5 million ($0.05 per share) of which $83.9 million related to share-based compensation and $18.6 million related to the compensation shift.
Impact of Foreign Currency Translation on Reported Results
IMPACT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION ON REPORTED RESULTS
Dollars in millions, except per share data
Combined operating margins*
Net income per common share diluted
Six Months Ended June 30,
13
Foreign currency translation had a positive impact on the growth rates of consolidated revenues, operating income, net income and earnings per share for the quarter and six months, primarily due to the stronger Euro, as well as other major currencies.
Revenues consist of sales by Company-operated restaurants and fees from restaurants operated by franchisees and affiliates. These fees primarily include rent, service fees and/or royalties that are based on a percent of sales, with specified minimum rent payments.
REVENUES
Dollars in millions
Company-operated sales
Total
Franchised and affiliated revenues
14
Consolidated revenues increased 8% (5% in constant currencies) for the quarter and 8% (6% in constant currencies) for the six months, primarily due to positive comparable sales in each month of 2005.
In the U.S., the increase in revenues for the quarter and six months was driven by multiple initiatives that are delivering variety, value, and convenience to our customers. We remain confident that our combination of initiatives will continue to build on the foundation established and deliver solid results throughout 2005.
Europes increase in revenues for both periods was due to strong comparable sales in Russia, which is entirely Company-operated, and positive comparable sales in France, partly offset by negative comparable sales in the U.K.
In APMEA, revenues for the quarter and six months benefited from strong comparable sales in Australia and Taiwan, and were negatively impacted by the sale in March of certain Philippines subsidiaries, which are now structured as a developmental licensee. Under this structure, the Company receives a royalty based on a percent of sales. In addition, for the six months, revenues benefited from expansion in China, partly offset by negative comparable sales.
15
The following table presents the percent change in comparable sales for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
McDonalds Restaurants
* Excludes non-McDonalds brands.
The following table presents the percent change in Systemwide sales for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005:
Total sales
16
Operating Margins
COMPANY-OPERATED AND FRANCHISED RESTAURANT MARGINS
McDONALDS RESTAURANTS
Company-operated
Franchised
Combined operating margin dollars increased $75.6 million or 5% for the quarter (3% in constant currencies) and $181.4 million or 7% for the six months (4% in constant currencies). The U.S. and Europe segments accounted for almost 85% of the combined margin dollars.
In the U.S., the Company-operated margin percent decreased for the quarter and six months due to higher labor-related costs, partly due to increased compensation for store managers and crew as well as increased staffing levels, higher commodity costs and increased rent expense. This was partly offset by the impact of positive comparable sales. Commodity cost pressures are expected to lessen during the remainder of the year.
In Europe, the Company-operated margin percent for both periods of 2005 decreased due to the U.K. and Germany, primarily as a result of brand building marketing initiatives in both markets and higher labor-related costs in the U.K. In addition, higher commodity costs, primarily beef, had a negative impact on the segment for both periods. Beef cost pressures are expected to lessen in the second half of the year.
17
In APMEA, the Company-operated margin percent in both periods decreased due to weak results in South Korea. For the six months, results benefited from positive results in China and Hong Kong.
The following table presents margin components as a percent of sales:
COMPANY-OPERATED EXPENSES AND MARGINS AS A PERCENT OF SALES
Food & paper
Payroll & employee benefits
Occupancy & other operating expenses
Total expenses
Company-operated margins
The consolidated Franchised margin percent increased for the quarter and six months primarily due to positive comparable sales in the U.S., but reflected higher occupancy costs, due in part to an increased proportion of leased sites.
Selling, General & Administrative Expenses
Selling, general & administrative expenses increased 8% for the quarter (6% in constant currencies) and 11% for the six months (9% in constant currencies). The share-based and related incremental compensation expense due to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) accounted for the constant currency increase. Selling, general & administrative expenses as a percent of revenues were 10.7% for the six months of 2005 compared with 10.5% for the six months of 2004 and as a percent of Systemwide sales were 4.0% for 2005 compared with 3.9% for 2004. The share-based and related incremental compensation expense increased these ratios 1.0 percentage points and 0.4 percentage points, respectively, in 2005.
Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net
OTHER OPERATING (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET
Gains on sales of restaurant businesses
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
Impairment and other charges (credits)
Other expense
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates was impacted in both periods of 2005 by weak results from our Japanese affiliate.
Impairment and other charges (credits) included a favorable adjustment in the first quarter of 2005 to certain liabilities established in 2001 and 2002 due to lower than originally anticipated employee-related and lease termination costs. The quarter and six months of 2004 reflected a $12.6 million write-off of goodwill in Thailand.
Other expense for the six months of 2005 reflected a $24.1 million charge related to a supply chain arrangement in Europe.
18
Operating Income
OPERATING INCOME
19
The following discussion on Operating Income relates to Pro Forma % Inc / (Dec) Excluding Currency Translation in the table above.
In the U.S., results increased for the quarter and six months primarily due to higher combined operating margin dollars, partly offset by higher selling, general & administrative expenses, which included certain information technology expenses previously recorded in the Corporate segment.
In Europe, results for both periods reflected strong performance in France, which was more than offset by weak results in the U.K. and Germany. In addition, results for the six months 2005 included the supply chain charge of $24.1 million, which negatively impacted the operating income growth rate by approximately 4 percentage points.
In APMEA, results for both periods were negatively impacted by weak performance in Japan and South Korea, and to a lesser extent, were positively impacted by results in Australia and Taiwan.
Corporate results for the quarter and six months 2005 reflected lower incentive-based compensation as well as certain information technology expenses that were shifted to the U.S. segment. In addition, results for the six months benefited from the favorable adjustment to certain liabilities established in 2001 and 2002 previously discussed in the Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net section.
Interest, Nonoperating (Income) Expense and Income Taxes
Interest expense for the quarter and six months 2005 reflected lower average debt levels, partly offset by higher average interest rates and stronger foreign currencies.
For the six months 2005, nonoperating (income) reflected higher interest income.
20
The effective income tax rate was 43.3% for second quarter 2005 compared with 31.8% in 2004. The higher effective income tax rate in 2005 included an additional expense of approximately $112.0 million (representing about 12 percentage points of the second quarter tax rate) related to the Companys decision to take advantage of the one-time opportunity provided under the Homeland Investment Act. The effective income tax rate was 28.7% for the six months 2005 compared with a 32.1% in 2004. The lower income tax rate in 2005 was primarily due to a benefit of $178.8 million for a favorable audit settlement of the Companys 2000-2002 U.S. tax returns in the first quarter, partly offset by the additional expense of $112.0 million discussed above (the net of both items benefited the six month tax rate by about 4 percentage points).
Cash Flows and Financial Position
The Company generates significant cash from operations and has substantial credit capacity to fund operating and discretionary spending such as capital expenditures, debt repayments, dividends and share repurchases.
Cash provided by operations totaled $1,745.5 million and exceeded capital expenditures by $1,143.0 million for the six months. Cash provided by operations increased $60.1 million compared to the six months 2004 driven by strong operating results, primarily in the U.S.
Cash used for investing activities totaled $649.0 million for the six months, an increase of $215.4 million primarily due to higher capital spending and increased purchases of restaurant businesses. Capital expenditures increased $118.7 million for the six months consistent with the Companys strategy to increase investment in existing restaurants, primarily in the U.S.
Cash used for financing activities totaled $915.7 million for the six months, an increase of $101.9 million primarily due to higher share repurchases, partly offset by lower net debt repayments and higher proceeds from stock options exercised.
Debt obligations at June 30, 2005 totaled $8,556.9 million compared with $9,219.5 million at December 31, 2004. The decrease in 2005 was due to net repayments of $200.2 million, the impact of changes in exchange rates on foreign currency-denominated debt of $439.9 million and SFAS No. 133 noncash fair value adjustments of $22.5 million.
As a result of the above activity, the Companys cash balance increased $180.8 million from December 31, 2004 to $1,560.6 million at June 30, 2005. For the full year, the Company expects capital expenditures to be approximately $1.7 billion, debt repayments to be approximately $600 million to $800 million and to return about $2 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases in 2005. The guidance related to debt repayments does not take into account the actions that will be taken due to our decision to repatriate $3.2 billion under the Homeland Investment Act.
21
Restaurant Information
The following table presents restaurant information by ownership type:
Operated by franchisees
Operated by the Company
Operated by affiliates
Systemwide restaurants
This report includes forward-looking statements about our operating plans and future performance, including those under Outlook. These statements use such words as may, will, expect, believe, plan and other similar terminology. They reflect managements current expectations about future events and speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise them. Managements expectations may change or not be realized and, in any event, they are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and often beyond our control. For these reasons, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The following are some of the considerations and factors that could change our expectations (or the underlying assumptions) or affect our ability to realize them:
22
23
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There were no material changes to the disclosure made in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 regarding this matter.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2005. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Such officers also confirm that there was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
24
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 21, 2005, the Company reported that on May 31, 2005, a public civil action was filed in Brazil by the Federal Attorneys Office for the Federal District against, among others, McDonalds Comércio de Alimentos Ltda, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (McCal), and three of its former employees. The complaint alleges that McCal and its former employees made an improper payment to obtain tax guidance relating to the deductibility of franchisee royalty payments in Brazil. The complaint seeks certain monetary and non-monetary relief. The Company does not believe that this action will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results. The Companys investigation of the allegations is ongoing, however, and it cannot predict the outcome of this matter. The Company has also reported the allegations to the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table presents information related to repurchases of common stock the Company made during the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
April 1-30, 2005
May 1-31, 2005
June 1-30, 2005
25
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(1) In the election of directors, each nominee was elected by a vote of the shareholders as follows:
Additional directors, whose terms of office as Directors continued after the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, are as follows:
(2) The proposal to approve the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm for 2005 was approved by shareholders as follows:
(3) The shareholder proposal relating to genetic engineering of food and seed was not approved by shareholders as follows:
BROKER
NON-VOTE
26
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit Number
Description
(3)
(4)
27
28
29
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
August 5, 2005
/s/ Matthew H. Paull
30