Gen Digital - 10-Q quarterly report FY2011 Q2

 

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesþ No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

     Shares of Symantec common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of October 29, 2010: 776,254,468 shares.

     The condensed consolidated financial statements of Symantec Corporation (“we,” “us,” “our,” and “the Company” refer to Symantec Corporation and all of its subsidiaries) as of October 1, 2010 and April 2, 2010, and for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010 and October 2, 2009, have been prepared in accordance with the instructions on Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In accordance with those rules and regulations, we have omitted certain information and notes normally provided in our annual consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, except as otherwise noted, necessary for the fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations for the interim periods. The condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended October 2, 2009 have been adjusted for the impact of our joint venture’s adoption of new authoritative guidance on revenue recognition during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 as of the first quarter of fiscal 2010. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010. The results of operations for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire fiscal year. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

     On August 9, 2010, we completed the acquisition of the identity and authentication business of VeriSign, Inc. (“VeriSign”), including a controlling interest in its subsidiary VeriSign Japan K.K. (“VeriSign Japan”), a publicly traded company on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Given the Company’s majority ownership interest in VeriSign Japan, the accounts of VeriSign Japan have been consolidated with the accounts of the Company, and a noncontrolling interest has been recorded for the noncontrolling investors’ interests in the equity and operations of VeriSign Japan. See Note 3.

     We have a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year ending on the Friday closest to March 31. The three months ended October 1, 2010 and October 2, 2009 both consisted of 13 weeks. The six months ended October 1, 2010 and October 2, 2009 both consisted of 26 weeks. Our 2011 fiscal year consists of 52 weeks and ends on April 1, 2011.

     There have been no changes in our significant accounting policies for the six months ended October 1, 2010 as compared to the significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010.

     In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we adopted new authoritative guidance which changes the model for determining whether an entity should consolidate a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The standard replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a VIE with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a VIE and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive the entity’s residual returns. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010.

     We measure assets and liabilities at fair value based on an expected exit price as defined by the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements, which represents the amount that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be, in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs, used in valuation techniques, are assigned a hierarchical level. The following are the hierarchical levels of inputs to measure fair value:

     All of our financial instruments are measured and recorded at fair value. For certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and other current liabilities, the carrying value approximates the fair value due to the relative short maturity of these instruments. For our other financial instruments and/or financial assets, specifically short-term investments which primarily consist of available-for-sale securities, the fair value is determined using different assumptions as outlined above. Our equity investments in privately-held entities ($30 million as of October 1, 2010) are carried at cost and reduced to fair value if and when determined to be impaired. Our convertible senior notes, senior notes, and credit facility are carried at amortized cost and fair value measurements are made on a nonrecurring basis, as necessary.

     The following table summarizes our assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by level, within the fair value hierarchy:

     During the three months ended October 1, 2010, we repurchased $500 million of aggregate principal amount of our 0.75% convertible senior notes, which had a net book value of $481 million. Concurrently with the repurchase, we sold a proportionate share of the initial note hedges back to the note hedge counterparties for approximately $13 million. These transactions resulted in a loss from extinguishment of debt of approximately $16 million, which represents the difference between book value of the notes net of the remaining unamortized discount prior to repurchase and the fair value of the liability component of the notes upon repurchase. The fair value of the liability component was estimated to be $497 million using level 2 inputs based on market prices for similar convertible debt instruments and resulting yields thereof and level 3 inputs based on discounted cash flows based for future fixed amounts. Also see Note 6.

     On August 9, 2010, we completed the acquisition of the identity and authentication business of VeriSign, which included a controlling interest in VeriSign Japan and equity interests in certain other subsidiary entities. In exchange for the assets and liabilities of the acquired business, we paid a total purchase price of $1.29 billion in cash, which included estimated net cash and working capital adjustments of $8 million. No equity interests were issued. The results of operations of the identification and authentication business of VeriSign are included since the date of acquisition as part of the Security and Compliance segment. Supplemental pro forma information for VeriSign was not material to our financial results and was therefore not included. For the three and six months ended October 1, 2010, we recorded acquisition-related transaction costs of $11 million, which were included in general and administrative expenses.

     The initial allocation of the purchase price was based on a preliminary valuation, and our estimates and assumptions are subject to change within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date). The purchase accounting items that are not yet finalized include the valuation of intangible assets acquired, the fair value of certain tangible assets and liabilities acquired, the calculation of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities, and the net cash and working capital adjustments noted above. The following table presents the initial purchase price allocation included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (in millions):

     On June 4, 2010, we completed the acquisition of PGP Corporation (“PGP”), a nonpublic provider of email and data encryption software. In exchange for all of the voting equity interests of PGP, we paid a total purchase price of $306 million, excluding cash acquired. The results of operations of PGP are included since the date of acquisition as part of the Security and Compliance segment. Supplemental pro forma information for PGP was not material to our financial results and was therefore not included. For the six months ended October 1, 2010, we recorded acquisition-related transaction costs of $3 million, which were included in general and administrative expense.

     The following table presents the purchase price allocation included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (in millions):

     During fiscal 2011, we completed the acquisition of GuardianEdge Technologies, Inc. (“GuardianEdge”), a nonpublic provider of email and data encryption software. In exchange for all the voting equity interests, we paid a total purchase price of $73 million, excluding cash acquired. This includes $1 million in assumed equity awards at fair value. We also completed the acquisition of a business from a public provider of telecommunications and related services for a total purchase price of $6 million. The results of operations from both acquisitions are included since the date of acquisition as part of the Security and Compliance segment. Supplemental pro forma information for both acquisitions was not material to our financial results and was therefore not included. For the six months ended October 1, 2010, we recorded acquisition-related transaction costs of $1 million, which were included in general and administrative expense.

     The following table presents the purchase price allocation included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (in millions):

     Goodwill is allocated by reportable segment as follows:

     We apply a fair value based impairment test to the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or earlier if indicators of impairment exist. As of October 1, 2010, no indicators of impairment were identified.

     Amortization expense was $90 million and $196 million for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010, respectively, and $110 million and $270 million for the three and six months ended October 2, 2009, respectively.

     Total future amortization expense for intangible assets that have definite lives, based on our existing intangible assets and their current estimated useful lives as of October 1, 2010, is estimated as follows (in millions):

     Depreciation expense was $64 million and $123 million for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010, respectively, and $62 million and $122 million for the three and six months ended October 2, 2009, respectively.

     The components of comprehensive income, net of tax, are as follows:

     In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we issued $350 million in principal amount of 2.75% senior notes (“2.75% Notes”) due September 15, 2015 and $750 million in principal amount of 4.20% senior notes (“4.20% Notes”) due September 15, 2020, for an aggregate principal amount of $1.1 billion. The 2.75% Notes and 4.20% Notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Company that rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated obligations and are redeemable by us at any time, subject to a “make-whole” premium. Our proceeds were $1.1 billion, net of an issuance discount of approximately $3 million resulting from sale of the notes at a yield slightly above the stated coupons. We also incurred issuance costs of approximately $6 million. Both the discount and issuance costs are being amortized as incremental non-cash interest expense over the respective terms of the notes. The 2.75% Notes and 4.20% Notes bear interest at 2.75% and 4.20% per annum, respectively. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on the 15^th of March and September, beginning March 15, 2011. There was no cash paid for interest during the three and six months ended October 1, 2010.

     In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, we issued $1.1 billion in principal amount of 0.75% convertible senior notes (“0.75% Notes”) due June 15, 2011 and $1.0 billion in principal amount of 1.00% senior notes (“1.00% Notes”) due June 15, 2013. We received proceeds of $2.1 billion from the 0.75% Notes and 1.00% Notes and incurred net transaction costs of approximately $33 million, of which $9 million was allocated to equity and the remainder allocated proportionately to the 0.75% Notes and 1.00% Notes. The 0.75% Notes and 1.00% Notes were each issued at par and bear interest at 0.75% and 1.00% per annum, respectively. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15.

     Concurrent with the issuance of the 0.75% Notes and 1.00% Notes, the Company entered into note hedge transactions with affiliates of certain initial purchasers whereby the Company has the option to purchase up to 110 million shares of SYMC common stock at a price of $19.12 per share. The cost of the note hedge transactions was approximately $592 million.

     In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we repurchased $500 million of aggregate principal amount of our 0.75% Notes. Concurrently with the repurchase, we sold a proportionate share of the initial note hedges back to the note hedge counterparties for approximately $13 million. These transactions resulted in a loss from extinguishment of debt of approximately $16 million, which represents the difference between book value of the notes net of the remaining unamortized discount prior to repurchase and the fair value of the liability component of the notes upon repurchase. The net cost of the repurchase of the 0.75% Notes and the concurrent sale of the note hedges was $497 million in cash.

     In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we entered into a four-year $1.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility that expires in September 2014. The credit facility provides that we may borrow up to $1.0 billion under revolving loans. Revolving loans under the credit facility bear interest, at our option, either at a rate equal to a) a LIBOR plus a margin based on our consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the credit facility agreement or b) the bank’s prime rate plus a margin based on our consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the credit facility agreement. Under the terms of this credit facility, we must comply with certain financial and non-financial covenants, including a covenant to maintain a specified ratio of debt to earnings (before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and impairments). As of October 1, 2010, we were in compliance with all required covenants, and there was no outstanding balance on the credit facility.

     In addition, in the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we terminated our previous $1.0 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility that we entered into in July 2006. At the time of termination, there was no outstanding balance on the credit facility. The original expiration date for this credit facility was July 2011.

     Our restructuring costs and liabilities consist of severance, benefits, facilities, and other costs. Severance and benefits generally include severance, outplacement services, health insurance coverage, effects of foreign currency exchange, and legal costs. Facilities costs generally include rent expense, less expected sublease income and lease termination costs. Also included in Restructuring in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income are transition and transformation fees, consulting services, and other costs related to the outsourcing of back office functions. Restructuring expenses are included in the Other reporting segment.

     Charges for restructuring costs were $28 million and $68 million for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010, respectively, and $25 million and $59 million for the three and six months ended October 2, 2009, respectively. These amounts include transition, transformation, consulting, and other related costs of $4 million and $9 million for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010, respectively, and $10 million and $22 million for the three and six months ended October 2, 2009, respectively. Transition and transformation related activities are expected to be substantially completed by the end of fiscal 2011. Total remaining costs for transition and transformation activities are estimated to range from approximately $6 million to $11 million.

     The following details restructuring plans that management has committed to and are not substantially completed:

     In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, management approved and initiated the following restructuring events:

     In the third quarter of fiscal 2008, management approved and initiated the following restructuring events:

     As a result of business acquisitions, management may deem certain job functions to be redundant and facilities to be in excess either at the time of acquisition or for a period of time after the acquisition in conjunction with our integration efforts. As of October 1, 2010, acquisition-related restructuring liabilities, primarily related to excess facility obligations at several locations around the world, are expected to be paid over the respective lease terms, the longest of which extends through fiscal 2018.

     As permitted under Delaware law, we have agreements whereby we agree to indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving at our request in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is not limited; however, we have directors’ and officers’ insurance coverage that reduces our exposure and may enable us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. We believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal.

     We provide limited product warranties, and the majority of our software license agreements contain provisions that indemnify licensees of our software from damages and costs resulting from claims alleging that our software infringes the intellectual property rights of a third party. Historically, payments made under these provisions have been immaterial. We monitor the conditions that are subject to indemnification to identify if a loss has occurred.

     For a discussion of our pending tax litigation with the Internal Revenue Service relating to the 2000 and 2001 tax years of Veritas, see Note 12.

     On July 7, 2004, a purported class action complaint entitled Paul Kuck, et al. v. Veritas Software Corporation, et al. was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The lawsuit alleges violations of federal securities laws in connection with Veritas’ announcement on July 6, 2004 that it expected results of operations for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 to fall below earlier estimates. The complaint generally seeks an unspecified amount of damages. Subsequently, additional purported class action complaints have been filed in Delaware federal court, and, on March 3, 2005, the Court entered an order consolidating these actions and appointing lead plaintiffs and counsel. A consolidated amended complaint (“CAC”), was filed on May 27, 2005, expanding the class period from April 23, 2004 through July 6, 2004. The CAC also named another officer as a defendant and added allegations that Veritas and the named officers made false or misleading statements in press releases and SEC filings regarding Veritas’s financial results, which allegedly contained revenue recognized from contracts that were unsigned or lacked essential terms. The defendants to this matter filed a motion to dismiss the CAC in July 2005; the motion was denied in May 2006. In April 2008, the parties filed a stipulation of settlement. On July 31, 2008, the Court held a final approval hearing and, on August 5, 2008, the Court entered an order approving the settlement. An objector to the fees portion of the settlement has lodged an appeal. In fiscal 2008, we recorded an accrual in the amount of $21.5 million for this matter and, pursuant to the terms of the settlement, we established a settlement fund of $21.5 million on May 1, 2008.

     We are also involved in a number of other judicial and administrative proceedings that are incidental to our business. Although adverse decisions (or settlements) may occur in one or more of the cases, it is not possible to estimate the possible loss or losses from each of these cases. The final resolution of these lawsuits, individually or in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

     The following table summarizes our stock repurchases:

     We have had stock repurchase programs in the past and have repurchased shares on a quarterly basis since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 under new and existing programs. Our most recent program was authorized by our Board of Directors on October 27, 2009 to repurchase up to $1 billion of our common stock. This program does not have an expiration date and as of October 1, 2010, $322 million remained authorized for future repurchases.

     As of October 1, 2010, our five reportable segments are the same as our operating segments and are as follows:

     The accounting policies of the segments are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010 and have not changed as of October 1, 2010. There were no intersegment sales for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010.

     The following table summarizes the results of our operating segments:

     During the three months ended October 1, 2010, we recorded adjustments to revenue of the Consumer segment and research and development expense of the Security and Compliance segment. The revenue adjustment reduced the Consumer segment revenue by approximately $10 million, as a result of certain consumers not receiving their subscription entitlements on a timely basis. The research and development expense adjustment reduced the Security and Compliance segment expense by approximately $10 million related to increased capitalization of certain costs for internally developed software.

     We assessed the materiality of these adjustments as required by the authoritative guidance on accounting changes and error corrections, which included an evaluation of all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors, and determined that the impact of the resulting adjustments is not material to our financial statements for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010 or to the projected full year results for fiscal 2011. In addition, we do not believe the adjustments are material to the amounts reported in prior periods. As a result of this assessment, the adjustments were included in our condensed consolidated financial statements during the three months ended October 1, 2010.

     The following table summarizes the total stock-based compensation expense recognized in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income:

     The following table summarizes additional information pertaining to our stock-based compensation:

     The effective tax rate was approximately 24% and 12% for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010, respectively, and 30% and 31% for the three and six months ended October 2, 2009, respectively.

     As discussed below, we recognized a $38.5 million additional tax benefit arising from theVeritas v. Commissioner Tax Court decision in the six months ended October 1, 2010 as well as a $4.4 million and a $14.9 million tax benefit during the three months and six months ended October 1, 2010, respectively, for discrete events primarily related to tax settlements, lapses of statutes of limitations, and adjustments of prior year items. We recognized a $2 million tax benefit during the three months ended October 2, 2009 from favorable adjustments for prior year items. As discussed further below, we recorded a $7 million tax expense for the six months ended October 2, 2009 related to the U.S. tax treatment of certain stock based compensation under Xilinx v. Commissioner.

     The provision for the six-month periods ended October 1, 2010 and October 2, 2009 otherwise reflects a forecasted tax rate of 28% and 31% (excluding the tax benefit from our joint venture with Huawei), respectively. The forecasted tax rates for both periods presented reflect the benefits of lower-taxed foreign earnings, domestic manufacturing incentives, and research and development credits (the U.S. federal R&D tax credit expired on December 31, 2009), partially offset by state income taxes. The forecasted tax rate for fiscal 2011 is lower than in fiscal 2010, primarily due to higher benefits from lower-taxed foreign earnings.

     We include the tax benefit associated with the loss from our joint venture with Huawei in income tax expense rather than netting the tax benefit against our joint venture loss with Huawei. However, the effective rate applied to our joint venture loss with Huawei for purposes of determining the tax benefit is based only on our joint venture loss with Huawei and its tax impact.

     On May 27, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned a 2005 U.S. Tax Court ruling in Xilinx v. Commissioner, holding that stock-based compensation related Research and Development (“R&D”) must be shared by the participants of a R&D cost sharing arrangement. The Ninth Circuit held that related parties to such an arrangement must share stock option costs, notwithstanding the U.S. Tax Court’s finding that unrelated parties in such an arrangement would not share such costs. Symantec has a similar R&D cost sharing arrangement in place. The Ninth Circuit’s reversal of the U.S. Tax Court’s decision changed our estimate of stock option related tax benefits previously recognized under the authoritative guidance on income taxes. As a result of the Ninth Circuit’s ruling, we increased our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, recording a tax expense of approximately $7 million and a reduction of additional paid-in capital of approximately $30 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. On January 13, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals withdrew its issued opinion. On March 22, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a revised decision affirming the decision of the Tax Court. The Ninth Circuit’s decision agreed with the Tax Court’s finding that related companies are not required to share such costs. As a result of the Ninth Circuit’s revised ruling, we released the liability established in our first quarter of fiscal 2010, which resulted in a $7 million tax benefit and an increase of additional paid-in capital of approximately $30 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. For fiscal 2010, there was no net income tax expense impact.

     On March 29, 2006, we received a Notice of Deficiency from the IRS claiming that we owe $867 million of additional taxes, excluding interest and penalties, for the 2000 and 2001 tax years, based on an audit of Veritas. On June 26, 2006, we filed a petition with the U.S. Tax Court protesting the IRS claim for such additional taxes. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, we agreed to pay $7 million out of $35 million originally assessed by the IRS in connection with several of the lesser issues covered in the assessment. The IRS agreed to waive the assessment of penalties. During July 2008, we completed the trial phase of the Tax Court case, which dealt with the remaining issue covered in the assessment. At trial, the IRS changed its position with respect to this remaining issue, which decreased the remaining amount at issue from $832 million to $545 million, excluding interest. We filed our post-trial briefs in October 2008 and rebuttal briefs in November 2008 with the U.S. Tax Court.

     On December 10, 2009, the U.S. Tax Court issued its opinion, finding that our transfer pricing methodology, with appropriate adjustments, was the best method for assessing the value of the transaction at issue between Veritas and its international subsidiary. The Tax Court judge provided guidance as to how adjustments would be made to correct the application of the method used by Veritas. We remeasured and decreased our liability for unrecognized tax benefits accordingly, resulting in a $78.5 million tax benefit in the third quarter in fiscal 2010. In June 2010, we reached an agreement with the IRS concerning the amount of the adjustment related to the U.S. Tax Court decision. As a result of the agreement, we further reduced our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, resulting in an additional $38.5 million tax benefit in the first quarter in fiscal 2011. On August 10, 2010, the Tax Court Judge issued the final decision order reflecting the agreed-to income adjustment. The IRS has until November 8, 2010 to appeal the tax court decision.

     In July 2008, we reached an agreement with the IRS concerning our eligibility to claim a lower tax rate on a distribution made from a Veritas international subsidiary prior to the July 2005 acquisition. The distribution was intended to be made pursuant to the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, and therefore is eligible for a 5.25% effective U.S. federal rate of tax, in lieu of the 35% statutory rate. The final impact of this agreement is not yet known since this relates to the taxability of earnings that are otherwise the subject of transfer pricing matters at issue in the IRS examination of Veritas tax years 2002-2005. To the extent that we owe taxes as a result of these transfer pricing matters in years prior to the distribution, we anticipate that the incremental tax due from this negotiated agreement will decrease. We currently estimate that the most probable outcome from this negotiated agreement will be that we will owe $13 million or less, for which an accrual has already been made.

     On December 2, 2009, we received a Revenue Agent’s Report from the IRS for the Veritas 2002 through 2005 tax years assessing additional taxes due. We agree with $30 million of the tax assessment, excluding interest, but will contest the other $80 million of tax assessed and all penalties. The unagreed issues concern transfer pricing matters comparable to the one that was resolved in our favor in the Veritas v. Commissioner Tax Court decision. On January 15, 2010, we filed a protest with the IRS in connection with the $80 million of tax assessed. On September 28, 2010, the case was formally accepted into Appeals for consideration.

     We made a payment of $130 million to the IRS in May 2006 to address the Veritas matters described above for our 2000-2005 tax years.

     We continue to monitor the progress of ongoing tax controversies and the impact, if any, of the expected tolling of the statute of limitations in various taxing jurisdictions.

     The components of earnings per share are as follows:

     The effect of the warrants issued and options purchased in connection with the convertible senior notes were excluded from earnings per share for the reasons discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010.

     The discussion below contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to safe harbors under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include references to our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, as well as statements including words such as “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “projects,” and similar expressions. In addition, statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance, anticipated growth and trends in our businesses and in our industries, the anticipated impacts of acquisitions, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions, based on our current expectations about future events and may not prove to be accurate. We do not undertake any obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events occurring or circumstances arising after the date of this report. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and our actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements on the basis of several factors, including those that we discuss in Risk Factors, set forth in Part I, Item 1A, of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010. We encourage you to read that section carefully.

     We have a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year ending on the Friday closest to March 31. The three months ended October 1, 2010 and October 2, 2009 both consisted of 13 weeks. The six months ended October 1, 2010 and October 2, 2009 both consisted of 26 weeks.

     Symantec is a global provider of security, storage, and systems management solutions that help businesses and consumers secure and manage their information. We provide customers worldwide with software and services that protect, manage and control information risks related to security, data protection, storage, compliance, and systems management. We help our customers manage cost, complexity, and compliance by protecting their IT infrastructure as they seek to maximize value from their IT investments.

     Our operating segments are significant strategic business units that offer different products and services, distinguished by customer needs. Since the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we have operated in five operating segments: Consumer, Security and Compliance, Storage and Server Management, Services, and Other. For further descriptions of our operating segments, see Note 10 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this quarterly report. Our reportable segments are the same as our operating segments.

     Revenue was flat for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010 as compared to the same periods last year. During the first six months of fiscal 2011, we experienced growth in our Security and Compliance segment as a result of revenue associated with our acquisitions and, to a lesser extent, revenue from our hosted services. We also experienced growth in our Consumer businesses, driven by our multi-channel strategy. Within our Storage and Server Management segment, strength in our backup and archiving solutions was offset by weakness in our storage management solutions evidenced in particular by lower revenues from our relationship with Sun/Oracle. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we completed the transition to our internally-developed eCommerce platform for the company’s Norton-branded consumer products worldwide, excluding Japan. The fees we had previously paid to Digital River had been recorded as an offset to revenue; however, we now incur expenses resulting from our eCommerce platform that appear as a cost of revenue and an operating expense. For the six months ended October 1, 2010, we acquired PGP Corporation, GuardianEdge Technologies, Inc. and the identity and authentication business of VeriSign, Inc, for an aggregate amount of approximately $1.5 billion. We expect that these acquisitions will contribute positively to our revenue in future periods, in the Security and Compliance segment.

     Fluctuations in the U.S. dollar compared to foreign currencies unfavorably impacted our international revenue by approximately $29 million and $51 million for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010 as compared to the same periods last year. We are unable to predict the extent to which revenue in future periods will be impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. If our level of international sales and expenses increase in the future, changes in foreign exchange rates may have a potentially greater impact on our revenue and operating results.

     Our net income attributable to Symantec Corporation stockholders was $136 million and $297 million for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010 and was positively impacted by a decrease of $25 million and $68 million, respectively, in cost of revenue related to certain acquired product rights from our acquisition of Veritas becoming fully amortized during the first and second quarter of fiscal 2010. Net income was also positively impacted by tax benefits primarily resulting from the reversal of accrued liabilities related to the Veritas Software tax assessment for 2000 and 2001 of $4 million and $53 million for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010, respectively.

     There have been no changes in the matters for which we make critical accounting estimates in the preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements during the six months ended October 1, 2010 as compared to those disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2010.

     Information with respect to Recently Adopted Authoritative Guidance is in Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

     Net revenue was flat for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010, as compared to the same periods last year, driven by the items discussed above under “Financial Results and Trends.”

     The changes in revenue for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010 are further described in the segment discussions that follow.

     Content, subscription, and maintenance revenue increased for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010, as compared to the same periods last year, primarily as a result of strength in our Consumer segment where we completed the transition to our new eCommerce platform during the first quarter of fiscal 2011 and continued to benefit from our broad range of distribution agreements with retailers and PC manufacturers. The growth in content, subscription, and maintenance revenue also reflects the expansion of our hosted services customer base and the identity and authentication business of VeriSign, Inc., as well as the matters discussed above under “Financial Results and Trends.”

     License revenue decreased for the three months ended October 1, 2010, as compared to the same period last year, primarily due to weakness in our storage management solutions evidenced in particular by lower revenues from our relationship with Sun/Oracle, as well as due to the lengthening of procurement cycles driven by continued cautiousness among IT buyers.

     License revenue decreased for the six months ended October 1, 2010, as compared to the same period last year, primarily due to the lengthening of procurement cycles driven by continued cautiousness among IT buyers, particularly with respect to the storage management products within the Storage and Server Management segment, as well as for the reasons discussed above under “Financial Results and Trends.”

     Consumer segment

     Consumer revenue increased for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010, as compared to the same periods last year, primarily due to increased sales of our premium security suite and for the reasons discussed above under “Financial Results and Trends.” Consumer revenue, for the three months ended October 1, 2010, includes an adjustment as a result of certain consumers not receiving their subscription entitlements on a timely basis, which resulted in a $10 million decrease to revenue and a reduction to operating income during the three and six months ended October 1, 2010.

     Our electronic channel sales are derived from online sales (which includes new subscriptions, renewals, and upgrades), original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), and internet service providers. For the three and six months ended October 1, 2010, electronic channel revenue increased as compared to the same periods last year. Electronic sales accounted for approximately 84% of Consumer revenue for the three and six months ended October 1, 2010, as compared to 81% and 80% in the same periods last year, respectively.

     Operating income for the Consumer segment decreased for the three months ended October 1, 2010, as compared to the same period last year, due to the revenue adjustment as mentioned above. Operating income for the Consumer segment decreased for the six months ended October 1, 2010, compared to the same period last year, primarily as a result of higher OEM placement fees and costs associated with our new proprietary eCommerce platform.