Erie Indemnity - 10-Q quarterly report FY2016 Q2

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

Commission file number 0-24000



	ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



	PENNSYLVANIA		25-0466020
	(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
	incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)



	100 Erie Insurance Place, Erie, Pennsylvania		16530
	(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)



	(814) 870-2000
	(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)



	Not applicable
	(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes X No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes X No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer X Accelerated Filer ___ Non-Accelerated Filer ___ Smaller Reporting Company ___

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes No X

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock as of the latest practicable date, with no par value and a stated value of $0.0292 per share, was 46,189,068 at July 15, 2016.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Class B Common Stock as of the latest practicable date, with no par value and a stated value of $70 per share, was 2,542 at July 15, 2016.

Table of Contents



PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Statements of Operations – Three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

	Statements of Comprehensive Income – Three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

	Statements of Financial Position – June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015

	Statements of Cash Flows – Six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

	Notes to Financial Statements – June 30, 2016

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures


PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings

Item 1A.	Risk Factors

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 6.	Exhibits


	SIGNATURES

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)



	Three months ended					Six months ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2016		2015			2016			2015
Operating revenue
Management fee revenue, net	$	416,665	$	394,224		$	784,123		$	737,458
Service agreement revenue	7,219		7,436			14,489			15,033
Total operating revenue	423,884		401,660			798,612			752,491

Operating expenses
Commissions	235,794		223,731			444,508			417,448
Salaries and employee benefits	55,025		57,354			108,314			112,373
All other operating expenses	47,306		50,592			92,366			100,257
Total operating expenses	338,125		331,677			645,188			630,078
Net revenue from operations	85,759		69,983			153,424			122,413

Investment income
Net investment income	4,891		4,435			9,553			8,976
Net realized investment gains (losses)	399		598			(689		)	358
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings	0		(35		)	(345		)	(155		)
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships	2,114		10,707			1,444			13,065
Total investment income	7,404		15,705			9,963			22,244
Income before income taxes	93,163		85,688			163,387			144,657
Income tax expense	31,854		29,538			56,183			49,674
Net income	$	61,309	$	56,150		$	107,204		$	94,983


Earnings Per Share
Net income per share
Class A common stock – basic	$	1.32	$	1.21		$	2.30		$	2.04
Class A common stock – diluted	$	1.17	$	1.07		$	2.04		$	1.81
Class B common stock – basic	$	197	$	181		$	345		$	306
Class B common stock – diluted	$	197	$	180		$	345		$	305

Weighted average shares outstanding – Basic
Class A common stock	46,188,867		46,189,068			46,188,967			46,189,068
Class B common stock	2,542		2,542			2,542			2,542

Weighted average shares outstanding – Diluted
Class A common stock	52,392,862		52,562,514			52,458,394			52,598,633
Class B common stock	2,542		2,542			2,542			2,542

Dividends declared per share
Class A common stock	$	0.730	$	0.681		$	1.460		$	1.362
Class B common stock	$	109.500	$	102.150		$	219.000		$	204.300

See accompanying notes to Financial Statements. See Note 10, "Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)", for amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into the Statements of Operations.

Table of Contents

ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY

STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)



	Three months ended					Six months ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2016		2015			2016		2015
Net income	$	61,309	$	56,150		$	107,204	$	94,983

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Change in unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities	3,026		(2,583		)	6,491		(2,483		)

Comprehensive income	$	64,335	$	53,567		$	113,695	$	92,500

Table of Contents

ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY

STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)



	June 30,			December 31,
	2016			2015
Assets	(Unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	124,111		$	182,889
Available-for-sale securities	46,087			62,067
Trading securities	496			—
Receivables from Erie Insurance Exchange and affiliates	387,273			348,055
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	33,885			24,697
Federal income taxes recoverable	0			11,947
Accrued investment income	5,816			5,491
Total current assets	597,668			635,146

Available-for-sale securities	607,548			537,874
Limited partnership investments	70,952			88,535
Fixed assets, net	58,986			59,087
Deferred income taxes, net	35,780			40,686
Note receivable from Erie Family Life Insurance Company	25,000			25,000
Other assets	18,892			20,968
Total assets	$	1,414,826		$	1,407,296

Liabilities and shareholders' equity
Current liabilities:
Commissions payable	$	217,203		$	195,542
Agent bonuses	58,235			106,752
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	90,856			88,532
Dividends payable	33,996			33,996
Deferred executive compensation	13,252			20,877
Federal income taxes payable	1,960			0
Total current liabilities	415,502			445,699

Defined benefit pension plans	170,619			172,700
Employee benefit obligations	910			1,234
Deferred executive compensation	12,461			16,580
Other long-term liabilities	140			1,580
Total liabilities	599,632			637,793

Shareholders’ equity
Class A common stock, stated value $0.0292 per share; 74,996,930 shares authorized; 68,299,200 shares issued; 46,189,068 shares outstanding	1,992			1,992
Class B common stock, convertible at a rate of 2,400 Class A shares for one Class B share, stated value $70 per share; 3,070 shares authorized; 2,542 shares issued and outstanding	178			178
Additional paid-in-capital	16,300			16,311
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(90,373		)	(96,864		)
Retained earnings	2,033,187			1,993,976
Total contributed capital and retained earnings	1,961,284			1,915,593
Treasury stock, at cost; 22,110,132 shares held	(1,155,301		)	(1,155,108		)
Deferred compensation	9,211			9,018
Total shareholders’ equity	815,194			769,503
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,414,826		$	1,407,296

See accompanying notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)



	Six months ended
	June 30,
	2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities
Management fee received	$	757,193		$	714,217
Service agreement fee received	14,489			15,033
Net investment income received	12,921			12,980
Limited partnership distributions	5,418			9,360
Decrease in reimbursements collected from affiliates	(12,288		)	(10,415		)
Commissions paid to agents	(363,968		)	(345,986		)
Agents bonuses paid	(107,170		)	(90,245		)
Salaries and wages paid	(90,509		)	(78,266		)
Pension contribution and employee benefits paid	(31,631		)	(28,263		)
General operating expenses paid	(91,715		)	(110,519		)
Income taxes paid	(42,258		)	(46,018		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	50,482			41,878

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of investments:
Available-for-sale securities	(161,835		)	(111,216		)
Limited partnerships	(367		)	(597		)
Proceeds from investments:
Available-for-sale securities	112,030			108,939
Trading securities	3,146			—
Limited partnerships	11,246			14,708
Net purchase of fixed assets	(7,257		)	(5,266		)
Net collections (distributions) on agent loans	1,770			(184		)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(41,267		)	6,384

Cash flows from financing activities
Dividends paid to shareholders	(67,993		)	(63,429		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(67,993		)	(63,429		)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(58,778		)	(15,167		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	182,889			91,747
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	124,111		$	76,580

See accompanying notes to Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Note 1. Nature of Operations

Erie Indemnity Company ("Indemnity", "we", "us", "our") is a publicly held Pennsylvania business corporation that has since its incorporation in 1925 served as the attorney-in-fact for the subscribers (policyholders) at the Erie Insurance Exchange ("Exchange"). The Exchange, which also commenced business in 1925, is a Pennsylvania-domiciled reciprocal insurer that writes property and casualty insurance. We function solely as the management company and all insurance operations are performed by the Exchange.

Our primary function, as attorney-in-fact, is to perform certain services for the Exchange relating to the sales, underwriting, and issuance of policies on behalf of the Exchange. This is done in accordance with a subscriber’s agreement (a limited power of attorney) executed individually by each subscriber (policyholder), which appoints us as their common attorney-in-fact to transact certain business on their behalf and to manage the affairs of the Exchange. Pursuant to the subscriber’s agreement and for its services as attorney-in-fact, we earn a management fee calculated as a percentage of the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange.

The services we provide to the Exchange are related to the sales, underwriting and issuance of policies. The sales related services we provide include agent compensation and certain sales and advertising support services. Agent compensation includes scheduled commissions to agents based upon premiums written as well as additional commissions and bonuses to agents, which are earned by achieving targeted measures. The underwriting services we provide include underwriting and policy processing. The remaining services we provide include customer service and administrative support. We also provide information technology services that support all the functions listed above.

By virtue of its legal structure as a reciprocal insurer, the Exchange does not have the ability to enter into contractual relationships and therefore Indemnity serves as the attorney-in-fact on behalf of the Exchange for all claims handling services and certain other common overhead and service department functions in accordance with the subscriber’s agreement. The amounts Indemnity incurs on behalf of the Exchange in this capacity are reimbursed to Indemnity from the Exchange at cost. See Note 11, "Related Party" contained within this report.

Our results of operations are tied to the growth and financial condition of the Exchange. If any events occurred that impaired the Exchange’s ability to grow or sustain its financial condition, including but not limited to reduced financial strength ratings, disruption in the independent agency relationships, significant catastrophe losses, or products not meeting customer demands, the Exchange could find it more difficult to retain its existing business and attract new business. A decline in the business of the Exchange almost certainly would have as a consequence a decline in the total premiums paid and a correspondingly adverse effect on the amount of the management fees we receive. We also have an exposure to a concentration of credit risk related to the unsecured receivables due from the Exchange for its management fee. See Note 12, "Concentrations of Credit Risk" contained within this report.

Table of Contents

Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2016.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified on the statements of financial position to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the previously reported results of operations.

Recently issued accounting standards

In February 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") updated Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 810 "Consolidation", which amended the existing guidance for determining if a reporting entity has a variable interest in a legal entity. We adopted the new accounting principle on a retrospective basis as of December 31, 2015. In accordance with the new accounting guidance, Indemnity is not deemed to have a variable interest in the Exchange as the fees paid for services provided to the Exchange no longer represent a variable interest. The compensation received from the attorney-in-fact fee arrangement with the subscribers is for services provided by Indemnity acting in its role as attorney-in-fact and is commensurate with the level of effort required to perform those services. Under the previously issued accounting guidance, Indemnity was deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the Exchange and its financial position and operating results were consolidated with Indemnity. Following adoption of the new accounting guidance, the Exchange’s results are no longer required to be consolidated with Indemnity. There was no cumulative effect to Indemnity's shareholders’ equity or net income from no longer consolidating the Exchange's results with ours.

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses", which requires financial assets measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected through the use of a new forward-looking expected loss model and credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities to be recognized through an allowance for credit losses. ASU 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 is permitted. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on our financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases", which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities arising from operating leases on the statement of financial position and to disclose key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. In transition, lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on our financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments-Overall". ASU 2016-01 revises the accounting related to the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. ASU 2016-01 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of this guidance on our financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers". ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 including interim periods within that reporting period. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our financial statements.

Table of Contents

Note 3. Earnings Per Share

Class A and Class B basic earnings per share and Class B diluted earnings per share are calculated under the two-class method. The two-class method allocates earnings to each class of stock based upon its dividend rights. Class B shares are convertible into Class A shares at a conversion ratio of 2,400 to 1. See Note 9, "Capital Stock".

Class A diluted earnings per share are calculated under the if-converted method, which reflects the conversion of Class B shares to Class A shares. Diluted earnings per share calculations include the dilutive effect of assumed issuance of stock-based awards under compensation plans that have the option to be paid in stock using the treasury stock method.

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the basic and diluted per-share computations is presented as follows for each class of common stock:



(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Three months ended June 30,
	2016					2015
	Allocated net income (numerator)		Weighted shares (denominator)	Per-share amount		Allocated net income (numerator)		Weighted shares (denominator)	Per-share amount
Class A – Basic EPS:
Income available to Class A stockholders	$	60,807	46,188,867	$	1.32	$	55,690	46,189,068	$	1.21
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards	0		103,195	—		0		272,646	—
Assumed conversion of Class B shares	502		6,100,800	—		460		6,100,800	—
Class A – Diluted EPS:
Income available to Class A stockholders on Class A equivalent shares	$	61,309	52,392,862	$	1.17	$	56,150	52,562,514	$	1.07
Class B – Basic EPS:
Income available to Class B stockholders	$	502	2,542	$	197	$	460	2,542	$	181
Class B – Diluted EPS:
Income available to Class B stockholders	$	502	2,542	$	197	$	458	2,542	$	180



(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Six months ended June 30,
	2016					2015
	Allocated net income (numerator)		Weighted shares (denominator)	Per-share amount		Allocated net income (numerator)		Weighted shares (denominator)	Per-share amount
Class A – Basic EPS:
Income available to Class A stockholders	$	106,327	46,188,967	$	2.30	$	94,205	46,189,068	$	2.04
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards	0		168,627	—		0		308,765	—
Assumed conversion of Class B shares	877		6,100,800	—		778		6,100,800	—
Class A – Diluted EPS:
Income available to Class A stockholders on Class A equivalent shares	$	107,204	52,458,394	$	2.04	$	94,983	52,598,633	$	1.81
Class B – Basic EPS:
Income available to Class B stockholders	$	877	2,542	$	345	$	778	2,542	$	306
Class B – Diluted EPS:
Income available to Class B stockholders	$	877	2,542	$	345	$	776	2,542	$	305

Table of Contents

Note 4. Fair Value

Our available-for-sale and trading securities are recorded at fair value, which is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction between willing market participants as of the measurement date.

Valuation techniques used to derive the fair value of our available-for-sale and trading securities are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources. Unobservable inputs reflect our own assumptions regarding fair market value for these securities. Although the majority of our prices are obtained from third party sources, we also perform an internal pricing review for securities with low trading volumes under current market conditions. Financial instruments are categorized based upon the following characteristics or inputs to the valuation techniques:


•	Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date.


•	Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.


•	Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

Estimates of fair values for our investment portfolio are obtained primarily from a nationally recognized pricing service. Our Level 1 category includes those securities valued using an exchange traded price provided by the pricing service. The methodologies used by the pricing service that support a Level 2 classification of a financial instrument include multiple verifiable, observable inputs including benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data. Pricing service valuations for Level 3 securities are based upon proprietary models and are used when observable inputs are not available or in illiquid markets.

In limited circumstances we adjust the price received from the pricing service when, in our judgment, a better reflection of fair value is available based upon corroborating information and our knowledge and monitoring of market conditions such as a disparity in price of comparable securities and/or non-binding broker quotes. In other circumstances, certain securities are internally priced because prices are not provided by the pricing service.

We perform continuous reviews of the prices obtained from the pricing service. This includes evaluating the methodology and inputs used by the pricing service to ensure that we determine the proper classification level of the financial instrument. Price variances, including large periodic changes, are investigated and corroborated by market data. We have reviewed the pricing methodologies of our pricing service as well as other observable inputs, such as data, and transaction volumes and believe that their prices adequately consider market activity in determining fair value. Our review process continues to evolve based upon accounting guidance and requirements.

When a price from the pricing service is not available, values are determined by obtaining broker/dealer quotes and/or market comparables. When available, we obtain multiple quotes for the same security. The ultimate value for these securities is determined based upon our best estimate of fair value using corroborating market information. Our evaluation includes the consideration of benchmark yields, reported trades, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data.

For certain securities in an illiquid market, there may be no prices available from a pricing service and no comparable market quotes available. In these situations, we value the security using an internally-developed, risk-adjusted discounted cash flow model.

Table of Contents

The following tables present our fair value measurements on a recurring basis by asset class and level of input:



	At June 30, 2016
	Fair value measurements using:
(in thousands)	Total		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets Level 1		Observable inputs Level 2		Unobservable inputs Level 3
Available-for-sale securities:
States & political subdivisions	$	241,824	$	0	$	241,824	$	0
Corporate debt securities	290,028		0		281,177		8,851
Residential mortgage-backed securities	14,029		0		14,029		0
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	40,023		0		39,020		1,003
Collateralized debt obligations	56,633		0		55,433		1,200
Other debt securities	1,984		0		1,984		0
Total fixed maturities	644,521		0		633,467		11,054
Common stock	9,114		9,114		0		0
Total available-for-sale securities	653,635		9,114		633,467		11,054
Trading securities:
Common stock	496		496		0		0
Other investments ⁽¹⁾	3,908		—		—		—
Total	$	658,039	$	9,610	$	633,467	$	11,054



	At December 31, 2015
	Fair value measurements using:
(in thousands)	Total		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets Level 1		Observable inputs Level 2		Unobservable inputs Level 3
Available-for-sale securities:
States & political subdivisions	$	231,847	$	0	$	231,847	$	0
Corporate debt securities	250,333		0		250,264		69
Residential mortgage-backed securities	13,513		0		13,513		0
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	37,571		0		37,571		0
Collateralized debt obligations	51,745		0		43,168		8,577
Other debt securities	2,200		0		2,200		0
Total fixed maturities	587,209		0		578,563		8,646
Common stock	12,732		12,732		0		0
Total available-for-sale securities	599,941		12,732		578,563		8,646
Other investments ⁽¹⁾	4,526		—		—		—
Total	$	604,467	$	12,732	$	578,563	$	8,646

(1) Other investments measured at fair value represent real estate funds included on the balance sheet as limited partnership investments that are reported under the fair value option using the net asset value practical expedient. These amounts are not required to be categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The investments can never be redeemed with the funds. Instead, distributions are received when liquidation of the underlying assets of the funds occur. It is estimated that the underlying assets will generally be liquidated between 5 and 10 years from the inception of the funds. The fair value of these investments is based on the net asset value (NAV) information provided by the general partner. Fair value is based on our proportionate share of the NAV based on the most recent partners' capital statements received from the general partners, which is generally one quarter prior to our balance sheet date. These values are then analyzed to determine if the NAV represents fair value at our balance sheet date, with adjustment being made where appropriate. We consider observable market data and perform a review validating the appropriateness of the NAV at each balance sheet date. It is likely that all of the investments will be redeemed at a future date for an amount different than the NAV of our ownership interest in partners' capital as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, no contributions were made and distributions totaling $0.7 million were received from these investments. During the year ended December 31, 2015, no contributions were made and distributions totaling $3.5 million were received from these investments. The amount of unfunded commitments related to the investments was $0.3 million as of June 30, 2016, and $0.6 million as of December 31, 2015.

Table of Contents

Level 3 Assets – Quarterly Change:





(in thousands)	Beginning balance at March 31, 2016		Included in earnings ⁽¹⁾		Included in other comprehensive income		Purchases		Sales			Transfers in and (out) of Level 3			Ending balance at June 30, 2016
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	4,821	$	30	$	54	$	5,131	$	(551	)	$	(634	)	$	8,851
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	0		0		3		1,000		0			0			1,003
Collateralized debt obligations	12,037		0		0		1,200		0			(12,037		)	1,200
Total fixed maturities	16,858		30		57		7,331		(551		)	(12,671		)	11,054
Total available-for-sale securities	16,858		30		57		7,331		(551		)	(12,671		)	11,054
Total Level 3 assets	$	16,858	$	30	$	57	$	7,331	$	(551	)	$	(12,671	)	$	11,054


(1)	These amounts are reported in the Statement of Operations as net investment income and net realized investment gains (losses) for the three months ended June 30, 2016 on Level 3 securities.

We review the fair value hierarchy classifications each reporting period. Transfers between hierarchy levels may occur due to changes in the available market observable inputs. Transfers in and out of level classifications are reported as having occurred at the beginning of the quarter in which the transfers occurred.

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for the three months ended June 30, 2016. Level 2 to Level 3 transfers totaled $1.7 million for seven fixed maturity holdings due to the use of unobservable market data to determine the fair value at June 30, 2016. Level 3 to Level 2 transfers totaled $14.3 million for 21 fixed maturity holdings due to the use of observable market data to determine the fair value at June 30, 2016.

Level 3 Assets – Year-to-Date Change:




(in thousands)	Beginning balance at December 31, 2015		Included in earnings ⁽¹⁾		Included in other comprehensive income			Purchases		Sales			Transfers in and (out) of Level 3			Ending balance at June 30, 2016
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	69	$	45	$	81		$	8,670	$	(606	)	$	592		$	8,851
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	0		0		3			1,000		0			0			1,003
Collateralized debt obligations	8,577		4		(12		)	4,722		(54		)	(12,037		)	1,200
Total fixed maturities	8,646		49		72			14,392		(660		)	(11,445		)	11,054
Total available-for-sale securities	8,646		49		72			14,392		(660		)	(11,445		)	11,054
Total Level 3 assets	$	8,646	$	49	$	72		$	14,392	$	(660	)	$	(11,445	)	$	11,054


(1)	These amounts are reported in the Statement of Operations as net investment income and net realized investment gains (losses) for the six months ended June 30, 2016 on Level 3 securities.

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Level 2 to Level 3 transfers totaled $3.0 million for 16 fixed maturity holdings due to the use of unobservable market data to determine the fair value at June 30, 2016. Level 3 to Level 2 transfers totaled $14.4 million for 22 fixed maturity holdings due to the use of observable market data to determine the fair value at June 30, 2016.

Table of Contents

Level 3 Assets – Quarterly Change:





(in thousands)	Beginning balance at March 31, 2015		Included in earnings		Included in other comprehensive income		Purchases		Sales		Transfers in and (out) of Level 3			Ending balance at June 30, 2015
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	110	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	(110	)	$	0
Collateralized debt obligations	0		0		0		660		0		0			660
Total fixed maturities	110		0		0		660		0		(110		)	660
Total available-for-sale securities	110		0		0		660		0		(110		)	660
Total Level 3 assets	$	110	$	0	$	0	$	660	$	0	$	(110	)	$	660

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 or from Level 2 to Level 3 for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Level 3 to Level 2 transfers totaled $0.1 million for one fixed maturity holding due to the use of observable market data to determine the fair value at June 30, 2015.

Level 3 Assets – Year-to-Date Change:




(in thousands)	Beginning balance at December 31, 2014		Included in earnings		Included in other comprehensive income		Purchases		Sales		Transfers in and (out) of Level 3			Ending balance at June 30, 2015
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	110	$	0	$	(110	)	$	0
Collateralized debt obligations	0		0		0		660		0		0			660
Total fixed maturities	0		0		0		770		0		(110		)	660
Total available-for-sale securities	0		0		0		770		0		(110		)	660
Total Level 3 assets	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	770	$	0	$	(110	)	$	660

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 or from Level 2 to Level 3 for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Level 3 to Level 2 transfers totaled $0.1 million for one fixed maturity holding due to the use of observable market data to determine the fair value at June 30, 2015.

Table of Contents

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Unobservable Inputs

When a non-binding broker quote was the only input available, the security was classified within Level 3. Use of non-binding brokers quotes totaled $11.1 million at June 30, 2016. The unobservable inputs are not reasonably available to us.

The following table presents our fair value measurements on a recurring basis by pricing source:



(in thousands)	At June 30, 2016
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Fixed maturities:
Priced via pricing services	$	642,318	$	0	$	633,467	$	8,851
Priced via market comparables/broker quotes	2,203		0		0		2,203
Total fixed maturities	644,521		0		633,467		11,054
Common stock:
Priced via pricing services	9,610		9,610		0		0
Total common stock	9,610		9,610		0		0
Other investments:
Priced via unobservable inputs ⁽¹⁾	3,908		—		—		—
Total other investments	3,908		—		—		—
Total	$	658,039	$	9,610	$	633,467	$	11,054

(1)

Other investments measured at fair value represent real estate funds included on the balance sheet as limited partnership investments that are reported under the fair value option using the net asset value practical expedient. These amounts are not required to be categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of these investments is based on the net asset value (NAV) information provided by the general partner.

There were no assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Table of Contents

Note 5. Investments

Available-for-sale securities

The following table summarizes the cost and fair value of our available-for-sale securities:



	At June 30, 2016
(in thousands)	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Estimated fair value
Available-for-sale securities:
States & political subdivisions	$	227,669	$	14,155	$	0	$	241,824
Corporate debt securities	288,887		2,361		1,220		290,028
Residential mortgage-backed securities	14,125		43		139		14,029
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	40,503		292		772		40,023
Collateralized debt obligations	56,761		104		232		56,633
Other debt securities	2,000		0		16		1,984
Total fixed maturities	629,945		16,955		2,379		644,521
Common stock	8,949		165		0		9,114
Total available-for-sale securities	$	638,894	$	17,120	$	2,379	$	653,635



	At December 31, 2015
(in thousands)	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Estimated fair value
Available-for-sale securities:
States & political subdivisions	$	221,093	$	10,761	$	7	$	231,847
Corporate debt securities	254,464		281		4,412		250,333
Residential mortgage-backed securities	13,639		4		130		13,513
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	38,630		30		1,089		37,571
Collateralized debt obligations	51,905		61		221		51,745
Other debt securities	2,241		0		41		2,200
Total fixed maturities	581,972		11,137		5,900		587,209
Common stock	12,865		0		133		12,732
Total available-for-sale securities	$	594,837	$	11,137	$	6,033	$	599,941

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturities at June 30, 2016 are shown below by remaining contractual term to maturity. Mortgage-backed securities are allocated based upon their stated maturity dates. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.



	At June 30, 2016
(in thousands)	Amortized		Estimated
	cost		fair value
Due in one year or less	$	45,685	$	45,799
Due after one year through five years	296,550		300,336
Due after five years through ten years	188,270		195,896
Due after ten years	99,440		102,490
Total fixed maturities	$	629,945	$	644,521

Table of Contents

Available-for-sale securities in a gross unrealized loss position are as follows. Data is provided by length of time for securities in a gross unrealized loss position.



	At June 30, 2016
(dollars in thousands)	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
	Fair value		Unrealized losses		Fair value		Unrealized losses		Fair value		Unrealized losses		No. of holdings
Available-for-sale securities:
Corporate debt securities	65,341		666		21,953		554		87,294		1,220		260
Residential mortgage-backed securities	5,051		18		2,599		121		7,650		139		7
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	1,283		7		17,931		765		19,214		772		18
Collateralized debt obligations	19,843		118		13,681		114		33,524		232		17
Other debt securities	0		0		1,984		16		1,984		16		1
Total fixed maturities	91,518		809		58,148		1,570		149,666		2,379		303
Total available-for-sale securities	$	91,518	$	809	$	58,148	$	1,570	$	149,666	$	2,379	303
Quality breakdown of fixed maturities:
Investment grade	$	42,174	$	170	$	47,584	$	1,069	$	89,758	$	1,239	56
Non-investment grade	49,344		639		10,564		501		59,908		1,140		247
Total fixed maturities	$	91,518	$	809	$	58,148	$	1,570	$	149,666	$	2,379	303



	At December 31, 2015
(dollars in thousands)	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
	Fair value		Unrealized losses		Fair value		Unrealized losses		Fair value		Unrealized losses		No. of holdings
Available-for-sale securities:
States & political subdivisions	$	5,867	$	7	$	0	$	0	$	5,867	$	7	3
Corporate debt securities	172,831		2,447		19,086		1,965		191,917		4,412		349
Residential mortgage-backed securities	9,827		84		936		46		10,763		130		9
Commercial mortgage-backed securities	13,081		68		19,081		1,021		32,162		1,089		24
Collateralized debt obligations	27,981		103		9,174		118		37,155		221		19
Other debt securities	1,960		40		241		1		2,201		41		2
Total fixed maturities	231,547		2,749		48,518		3,151		280,065		5,900		406
Common stock	12,732		133		0		0		12,732		133		1
Total available-for-sale securities	$	244,279	$	2,882	$	48,518	$	3,151	$	292,797	$	6,033	407
Quality breakdown of fixed maturities:
Investment grade	$	174,723	$	1,296	$	38,369	$	1,256	$	213,092	$	2,552	105
Non-investment grade	56,824		1,453		10,149		1,895		66,973		3,348		301
Total fixed maturities	$	231,547	$	2,749	$	48,518	$	3,151	$	280,065	$	5,900	406

The above securities have been evaluated and determined to be temporary impairments for which we expect to recover our entire principal plus interest. The primary components of this analysis include a general review of market conditions and financial performance of the issuer along with the extent and duration at which fair value is less than cost. Any securities that we intend to sell or will more likely than not be required to sell before recovery are included in other-than-temporary impairments with the impairment charges recognized in earnings.

Table of Contents

Net investment income

Interest and dividend income are recognized as earned and recorded to net investment income. Investment income, net of expenses, was generated from the following portfolios:



(in thousands)	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Fixed maturities	$	4,858	$	4,150	$	9,384	$	8,229
Equity securities	47		240		82		500
Cash equivalents and other	321		281		645		575
Total investment income	5,226		4,671		10,111		9,304
Less: investment expenses	335		236		558		328
Net investment income	$	4,891	$	4,435	$	9,553	$	8,976

Realized investment gains (losses)

Realized gains and losses on sales of securities are recognized in income based upon the specific identification method. Realized gains (losses) on investments were as follows:



(in thousands)	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Available-for-sale securities:
Fixed maturities:
Gross realized gains	$	438		$	340		$	572		$	371
Gross realized losses	(209		)	(104		)	(1,792		)	(375		)
Net realized gains (losses)	229			236			(1,220		)	(4		)
Equity securities:
Gross realized gains	0			362			0			362
Gross realized losses	0			0			(34		)	0
Net realized gains (losses)	0			362			(34		)	362
Trading securities:
Common stock:
Gross realized gains	586			0			586			0
Gross realized losses	0			0			0			0
Decreases in fair value⁽¹⁾	(416		)	0			(21		)	0
Net realized gains	170			0			565			0
Net realized investment gains (losses)	$	399		$	598		$	(689	)	$	358


(1)	The fair value of our common stocks is determined based upon exchange traded prices provided by a nationally recognized pricing service.

Net impairment losses

The components of other-than-temporary impairments on investments were as follows:



(in thousands)	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2016		2015			2016			2015
Fixed maturities	$	0	$	(35	)	$	(345	)	$	(155	)
Total other-than-temporary impairments	0		(35		)	(345		)	(155		)
Portion recognized in other comprehensive income	0		0			0			0
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings	$	0	$	(35	)	$	(345	)	$	(155	)

In considering if fixed maturity securities were credit-impaired, some of the factors considered include: potential for the default of interest and/or principal, level of subordination, collateral of the issue, compliance with financial covenants, credit ratings and industry conditions. We have the intent to sell all credit-impaired fixed maturity securities; therefore, the entire amount of the impairment charges were included in earnings and no non-credit impairments were recognized in other comprehensive income.

Table of Contents

Limited partnerships

Limited partnership investments, excluding certain real estate limited partnerships recorded at fair value, are generally reported on a one-quarter lag; therefore, our year-to-date limited partnership results through June 30, 2016 are comprised of partnership financial results for the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first quarter of 2016. Given the lag in reporting, our limited partnership results do not reflect the market conditions of the second quarter of 2016. Cash contributions made to and distributions received from the partnerships are recorded in the period in which the transaction occurs.

Amounts included in equity in earnings of limited partnerships by method of accounting are included below:



(in thousands)	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015

Equity in earnings of limited partnerships accounted for under the equity method	$	2,058	$	10,707	$	1,342	$	13,319
Change in fair value of limited partnerships accounted for under the fair value option	56		0		102		(254		)
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships	$	2,114	$	10,707	$	1,444	$	13,065

The following table summarizes limited partnership investments by sector:



(in thousands)	At June 30, 2016		At December 31, 2015
Private equity	$	39,917	$	48,397
Mezzanine debt	10,355		12,701
Real estate	16,772		22,911
Real estate - fair value option	3,908		4,526
Total limited partnerships	$	70,952	$	88,535

See also Note 13, "Commitments and Contingencies" for investment commitments related to limited partnerships.

Table of Contents

Note 6. Bank Line of Credit

As of June 30, 2016, we have access to a $100 million bank revolving line of credit with a $25 million letter of credit sublimit that expires on November 3, 2020. As of June 30, 2016, a total of $99.0 million remains available under the facility due to $1.0 million outstanding letters of credit, which reduce the availability for letters of credit to $24.0 million. We had no borrowings outstanding on our line of credit as of June 30, 2016. Bonds with a fair value of $111.1 million were pledged as collateral on the line at June 30, 2016. The securities pledged as collateral have no trading restrictions and are reported as available-for-sale securities in the Statements of Financial Position as of June 30, 2016. The bank requires compliance with certain covenants, which include leverage ratios, for our line of credit. We are in compliance with all bank covenants at June 30, 2016.

Note 7. Postretirement Benefits

Pension plans

Our pension plans consist of a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees and an unfunded supplemental employee retirement plan for certain members of executive and senior management. Although we are the sponsor of these postretirement plans and record the funded status of these plans, the Exchange reimburses us for approximately 58% of the annual benefit expense of these plans, which represents pension benefits for our employees performing claims and life insurance functions.

A $17.4 million contribution was made to the defined benefit pension plan in the first quarter of 2016.

Prior to 2003, the employee pension plan purchased annuities from Erie Family Life Insurance Company ("EFL"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Exchange, for certain plan participants that were receiving benefit payments under the pension plan. These are nonparticipating annuity contracts under which EFL has unconditionally contracted to provide specified benefits to beneficiaries; however, the pension plan remains the primary obligor to the beneficiaries. A contingent liability of $21.8 million at June 30, 2016 exists in the event EFL does not honor the annuity contracts.

The cost of our pension plans are as follows:



(in thousands)	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Service cost for benefits earned	$	7,050		$	7,608		$	14,100		$	15,216
Interest cost on benefits obligation	8,282			7,689			16,563			15,378
Expected return on plan assets	(9,880		)	(8,980		)	(19,760		)	(17,960		)
Prior service cost amortization	174			167			348			334
Net actuarial loss amortization	2,027			3,508			4,055			7,016
Pension plan cost ⁽¹⁾	$	7,653		$	9,992		$	15,306		$	19,984


(1)	Pension plan costs represent the total cost before reimbursements from the Exchange and EFL.

Note 8. Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate is calculated after consideration of permanent differences related to our investment revenues. Given that these amounts represent over 98% of the total permanent differences, the effective tax rate is approximately 35% when the investment related permanent differences are excluded.

Table of Contents

Note 9. Capital Stock

Class A and B common stock

Holders of Class B shares may, at their option, convert their shares into Class A shares at the rate of 2,400 Class A shares per Class B share. There were no shares of Class B common stock converted into Class A common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015. There is no provision for conversion of Class A shares to Class B shares, and Class B shares surrendered for conversion cannot be reissued.

Stock repurchase program

In October 2011, our Board of Directors approved a continuation of the current stock repurchase program for a total of $150 million, with no time limitation. There were no shares repurchased under this program during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015. We had approximately $17.8 million of repurchase authority remaining under this program at June 30, 2016.

Note 10. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, including amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and the related line item in the Statements of Operations where net income is presented, are as follows:



(in thousands)	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Investment securities:
Accumulated other comprehensive income, beginning of the period	$	5,992		$	6,907		$	2,527		$	6,807
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax (expense) benefit of $(1,710), $1,194, $(2,936) and $1,266, respectively	3,175			(2,217		)	5,452			(2,351		)
Reclassifications:
Realized investment (gains) losses, net of tax benefit (expense) of $80, $209, $(439), and $125, respectively	(149		)	(389		)	815			(233		)
Impairment losses, net of tax expense of $0, $12, $121 and $54, respectively	0			23			224			101
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	3,026			(2,583		)	6,491			(2,483		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, end of the period	$	9,018		$	4,324		$	9,018		$	4,324

Pension and other postretirement plans ⁽¹⁾:
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, beginning of the period	$	(99,391	)	$	(124,508	)	$	(99,391	)	$	(124,508	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax	0			0			0			0
Reclassifications:
Amortization of prior service costs, net of tax	0			0			0			0
Amortization of net actuarial loss, net of tax	0			0			0			0
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	0			0			0			0
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, end of the period	$	(99,391	)	$	(124,508	)	$	(99,391	)	$	(124,508	)

Total
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, beginning of the period	$	(93,399	)	$	(117,601	)	$	(96,864	)	$	(117,701	)
Investment securities	3,026			(2,583		)	6,491			(2,483		)
Pension and other postretirement plans	0			0			0			0
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	3,026			(2,583		)	6,491			(2,483		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, end of the period	$	(90,373	)	$	(120,184	)	$	(90,373	)	$	(120,184	)


(1)	There are no comprehensive income items or amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss related to postretirement plan items during interim periods.

Table of Contents

Note 11. Related Party

Amounts incurred on behalf of the Exchange and EFL

As discussed in Note 1, "Nature of Operations", all claims handling services for the Exchange are performed by our employees who are entirely dedicated to claims related activities. All costs associated with these employees, including postretirement benefits, are reimbursed to us from the Exchange’s revenues in accordance with the subscriber’s agreement. Also, we are reimbursed by EFL from its revenues for all costs, including postretirement benefits, associated with employees who perform life insurance related operating activities for EFL in accordance with its service agreement with us. See also Note 7, "Postretirement Benefits" for a discussion of intercompany expense allocations under the postretirement benefit plans. In addition, common overhead expenses and certain service department costs incurred by us on behalf of the Exchange and EFL are reimbursed by the proper entity based upon appropriate utilization statistics (employee count, square footage, vehicle count, project hours, etc.) specifically measured to accomplish proportional allocations, which we believe are reasonable.

All reimbursements are made on an actual cost basis and do not include a profit component. We record these reimbursements as receivables from the Exchange and EFL with a corresponding reduction to our expenses. Reimbursements are settled on a monthly basis. The amounts incurred on behalf of the Exchange and EFL were as follows:



(in thousands)	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Erie Insurance Exchange	$	115,868	$	104,530	$	226,263	$	207,046
Erie Family Life Insurance	9,944		10,205		19,504		18,756
Total cash settlements	$	125,812	$	114,735	$	245,767	$	225,802

Note 12. Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments could potentially expose us to concentrations of credit risk, including unsecured receivables from the Exchange. A large majority of our revenue and receivables are from the Exchange and affiliates. See also Note 1, "Nature of Operations". Management fee amounts and other reimbursements due from the Exchange and affiliates were $387.3 million and $348.1 million at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies

We have contractual commitments to invest up to $18.9 million related to our limited partnership investments at June 30, 2016. These commitments are split among private equity securities of $7.2 million, mezzanine debt securities of $8.4 million, and real estate activities of $3.3 million. These commitments will be funded as required by the limited partnership agreements.

We are involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of conducting business. In accordance with current accounting standards for loss contingencies and based upon information currently known to us, we establish reserves for litigation when it is probable that a loss associated with a claim or proceeding has been incurred and the amount of the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. When no amount within the range of loss is a better estimate than any other amount, we accrue the minimum amount of the estimable loss. To the extent that such litigation against us may have an exposure to a loss in excess of the amount we have accrued, we believe that such excess would not be material to our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Legal fees are expensed as incurred. We believe that our accruals for legal proceedings are appropriate and, individually and in the aggregate, are not expected to be material to our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

We review all litigation on an ongoing basis when making accrual and disclosure decisions. For certain legal proceedings, we cannot reasonably estimate losses or a range of loss, if any, particularly for proceedings that are in their early stages of development or where the plaintiffs seek indeterminate damages. Various factors, including, but not limited to, the outcome of potentially lengthy discovery and the resolution of important factual questions, may need to be determined before probability can be established or before a loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. If the loss contingency in question is not both probable and reasonably estimable, we do not establish an accrual and the matter will continue to be monitored for any developments that would make the loss contingency both probable and reasonably estimable. In the event that a legal proceeding results in a substantial judgment against, or settlement by, us, there can be no assurance that any resulting liability or financial commitment would not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Table of Contents

Note 14. Subsequent Events

No items were identified in this period subsequent to the financial statement date that required adjustment or additional disclosure.

Table of Contents


ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of financial condition and results of operations highlights significant factors influencing Erie Indemnity Company ("Indemnity", "we", "us", "our"). This discussion should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and the related notes thereto included in Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements" of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and with Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for the year ended December 31, 2015, as contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2016.

INDEX



	Page Number
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information	23
Recent Accounting Standards	24
Operating Overview	24
Results of Operations	27
Financial Condition	31
Liquidity and Capital Resources	33
Critical Accounting Estimates	34

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:

Statements contained herein that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements and, as such, are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events and results to differ, perhaps materially, from those discussed herein. Forward-looking statements relate to future trends, events or results and include, without limitation, statements and assumptions on which such statements are based that are related to our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations, intentions, and adequacy of resources. Examples of forward-looking statements are discussions relating to premium and investment income, expenses, operating results, and compliance with contractual and regulatory requirements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Among the risks and uncertainties, in addition to those set forth in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, that could cause actual results and future events to differ from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements include the following:


•	dependence upon our relationship with the Erie Insurance Exchange ("Exchange") and the management fee under the agreement with the subscribers at the Exchange;


•	costs of providing services to the Exchange under the subscriber’s agreement;


•	credit risk from the Exchange;


•	dependence upon our relationship with the Exchange and the growth of the Exchange, including:


◦	general business and economic conditions;


◦	factors affecting insurance industry competition;


◦	dependence upon the independent agency system; and


◦	ability to maintain our reputation for customer service;


•	dependence upon our relationship with the Exchange and the financial condition of the Exchange, including:


◦	the Exchange’s ability to maintain acceptable financial strength ratings;


◦	factors affecting the quality and liquidity of the Exchange’s investment portfolio;


◦	changes in government regulation of the insurance industry;


◦	emerging claims and coverage issues in the industry; and


◦	severe weather conditions or other catastrophic losses, including terrorism;


•	ability to attract and retain talented management and employees;


•	ability to maintain uninterrupted business operations;


•	factors affecting the quality and liquidity of our investment portfolio;


•	our ability to meet liquidity needs and access capital; and


•	outcome of pending and potential litigation.

Table of Contents

A forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made and reflects our analysis only as of that date. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions, or otherwise.

RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

We adopted amended guidance related to the consolidation of legal entities effective December 31, 2015, as required under generally accepted accounting principles. As a result of this new guidance, we are not deemed to have a variable interest in the Erie Insurance Exchange ("Exchange") as the fees paid for services provided to the Exchange no longer represent a variable interest. The compensation received from the attorney-in-fact fee arrangement with the subscribers is for services provided by us acting in our role as attorney-in-fact and is commensurate with the level of effort required to perform those services. Following adoption of the new accounting guidance, the Exchange’s results are no longer required to be consolidated with ours. No longer consolidating the Exchange resulted in no change to our net income or equity.

See Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements - Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, of Notes to Financial Statements" contained within this report for a discussion of this adopted standard as well as other recently issued accounting standards and the impact on our financial statements if known.

OPERATING OVERVIEW

Overview

We serve as the attorney-in-fact for the subscribers (policyholders) at the Exchange, a reciprocal insurer that writes personal and commercial property and casualty insurance. Our primary function is to perform certain services relating to the sales, underwriting and issuance of policies on behalf of the Exchange.

The Exchange is a reciprocal insurance exchange, which is an unincorporated association of individuals, partnerships and corporations that agree to insure one another. Each applicant for insurance to the Exchange signs a subscriber's agreement, which contains an appointment of Indemnity as their attorney-in-fact to transact business on their behalf.

Pursuant to the subscriber’s agreement and for its services as attorney-in-fact, we earn a management fee calculated as a percentage of the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange. Our earnings are primarily driven by the management fee revenue generated for the services we provide relating to certain sales, underwriting, and issuance of policies for the Exchange.

The sales related services we provide to the Exchange include agent compensation and certain sales and advertising support services. Agent compensation includes scheduled commissions to agents based upon premiums written as well as additional commissions and bonuses to agents, which are earned by achieving targeted measures. Agent compensation generally comprises approximately two-thirds of our expenses. The underwriting services we provide include underwriting and policy processing. The remaining services we provide include customer service and administrative support. We also provide information technology services that support all the functions listed above.

Our results of operations are tied to the growth and financial condition of the Exchange as the Exchange is our sole customer, and our earnings are largely generated from management fees based on the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange. The Exchange generates revenue by insuring preferred and standard risks, with personal lines comprising 70% of the 2015 direct and assumed written premiums and commercial lines comprising the remaining 30%. The principal personal lines products are private passenger automobile and homeowners. The principal commercial lines products are commercial multi-peril, workers compensation and commercial automobile.

Table of Contents

Financial Overview



	Three months ended June 30,							Six months ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2016		2015		% Change			2016		2015		% Change
	(Unaudited)							(Unaudited)
Total operating revenue	$	423,884	$	401,660	5.5		%	$	798,612	$	752,491	6.1		%
Total operating expenses	338,125		331,677		1.9			645,188		630,078		2.4
Net revenue from operations	85,759		69,983		22.5			153,424		122,413		25.3
Total investment income	7,404		15,705		(52.9	)		9,963		22,244		(55.2	)
Income before income taxes	93,163		85,688		8.7			163,387		144,657		12.9
Income tax expense	31,854		29,538		7.8			56,183		49,674		13.1
Net income	$	61,309	$	56,150	9.2		%	$	107,204	$	94,983	12.9		%
Net income per share - diluted	$	1.17	$	1.07	9.5		%	$	2.04	$	1.81	13.2		%

Net revenue from operations increased in both the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same periods in 2015 as revenue growth outpaced the growth in expenses. The two components of our primary revenue source, management fee revenue, are the management fee rate we charge, and the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange. The management fee rate was 25% for both 2016 and 2015. The direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange were $1.7 billion and $1.6 billion in the second quarters of 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $3.2 billion and $3.0 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Total operating expenses increased 1.9% in the second quarter of 2016 compared to the second quarter of 2015, and increased 2.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in operating expenses was driven by an increase in commissions, partially offset by lower non-commission expenses primarily from information technology costs.

Gross margin from operations increased to 20.2% in the second quarter of 2016 from 17.4% in the second quarter of 2015, and increased to 19.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 from 16.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Total investment income decreased 52.9% in the second quarter of 2016 compared to the second quarter of 2015, and decreased 55.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015 primarily due to lower earnings from limited partnership investments.

Table of Contents

Reconciliation of Operating Income to Net Income

We disclose operating income, a non-GAAP financial measure, to enhance our investors’ understanding of our performance. Our method of calculating this measure may differ from those used by other companies, and therefore comparability may be limited.

We define operating income as net income excluding realized capital gains and losses, impairment losses, and related federal income taxes.

We use operating income to evaluate the results of our operations. It reveals trends that may be obscured by the net effects of realized capital gains and losses including impairment losses. Realized capital gains and losses, including impairment losses, may vary significantly between periods and are generally driven by business decisions and economic developments such as capital market conditions which are not related to our ongoing operations. We are aware that the price to earnings multiple commonly used by investors as a forward-looking valuation technique uses operating income as the denominator. Operating income should not be considered as a substitute for net income prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") and does not reflect our overall profitability.

The following table reconciles operating income and net income:



(in thousands, except per share data)	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Operating income	$	61,049		$	55,784		$	107,876		$	94,851
Net realized gains (losses) and impairments on investments	399			563			(1,034		)	203
Income tax (expense) benefit	(139		)	(197		)	362			(71		)
Realized gains (losses) and impairments, net of income taxes	260			366			(672		)	132
Net income	$	61,309		$	56,150		$	107,204		$	94,983

Per Class A common share-diluted:
Operating income	$	1.17		$	1.07		$	2.05		$	1.81
Net realized gains (losses) and impairments on investments	0.00			0.00			(0.02		)	0.00
Income tax (expense) benefit	0.00			0.00			0.01			0.00
Realized gains (losses) and impairments, net of income taxes	0.00			0.00			(0.01		)	0.00
Net income	$	1.17		$	1.07		$	2.04		$	1.81

General Conditions and Trends Affecting Our Business

Economic conditions

Unfavorable changes in economic conditions, including declining consumer confidence, inflation, high unemployment, and the threat of recession, among others, may lead the Exchange’s customers to modify coverage, not renew policies, or even cancel policies, which could adversely affect the premium revenue of the Exchange, and consequently our management fee. Further, unanticipated increased inflation costs including medical cost inflation, construction and auto repair cost inflation, and tort issues may impact the estimated loss reserves and future premium rates. If any of these items impacted the financial condition or continuing operations of the Exchange, it could have an impact on our financial results.

Financial market volatility

Our portfolio of fixed maturity, equity security, and limited partnership investments is subject to market volatility especially in periods of instability in the worldwide financial markets. Over time, net investment income could also be impacted by volatility and by the general level of interest rates, which impact reinvested cash flow from the portfolio and business operations. Depending upon market conditions, which are unpredictable and remain uncertain, considerable fluctuation could exist in the fair value of our investment portfolio and reported total investment income, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

We earn management fee revenue from providing services relating to the sales, underwriting, and issuance of policies on behalf of the Exchange as a result of its attorney-in-fact relationship. A summary of the financial results of these operations is as follows:



	Three months ended June 30,									Six months ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2016			2015			% Change			2016			2015			% Change
	(Unaudited)									(Unaudited)
Management fee revenue, net	$	416,665		$	394,224		5.7		%	$	784,123		$	737,458		6.3		%
Service agreement revenue	7,219			7,436			(2.9	)		14,489			15,033			(3.6	)
Total operating revenue	423,884			401,660			5.5			798,612			752,491			6.1
Total operating expenses	338,125			331,677			1.9			645,188			630,078			2.4
Net revenue from operations	$	85,759		$	69,983		22.5		%	$	153,424		$	122,413		25.3		%
Gross margin	20.2		%	17.4		%	2.8		pts.	19.2		%	16.3		%	2.9		pts.

Management fee revenue

Management fee revenue is based upon all direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange and the management fee rate, which is determined by our Board of Directors at least annually. The management fee rate was set at 25%, the maximum rate, for both 2016 and 2015. Changes in the management fee rate can affect our revenue and net income significantly. Management fee revenue is calculated by multiplying the management fee rate by the direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange. The following table presents the calculation of management fee revenue:



	Three months ended June 30,								Six months ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2016			2015			% Change		2016			2015			% Change
	(Unaudited)								(Unaudited)
Direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange	$	1,677,059		$	1,585,295		5.8	%	$	3,151,691		$	2,962,633		6.4	%
Management fee rate	25		%	25		%			25		%	25		%
Management fee revenue, gross	419,265			396,324			5.8		787,923			740,658			6.4
Change in allowance for management fee returned on cancelled policies⁽¹⁾	(2,600		)	(2,100		)	23.8		(3,800		)	(3,200		)	18.8
Management fee revenue, net of allowance	$	416,665		$	394,224		5.7	%	$	784,123		$	737,458		6.3	%


(1)	Management fees are returned to the Exchange when policies are cancelled mid-term and unearned premiums are refunded. We record an estimated allowance for management fees returned on mid-term policy cancellations.

Direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange

Direct and assumed premiums include premiums written directly by the Exchange and premiums assumed from its wholly owned property and casualty subsidiaries. Direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange increased 5.8% to $1.7 billion in the second quarter of 2016 compared to the second quarter of 2015, driven by increases in both policies in force and average premium per policy. Year-over-year policies in force for all lines of business increased 3.4% in the second quarter of 2016, compared to 4.1% in the second quarter of 2015. The year-over-year average premium per policy for all lines of business increased 3.1% at June 30, 2016, compared to 3.9% at June 30, 2015.

Premiums generated from new business increased 2.6% to $200 million in the second quarter of 2016, compared to an increase of 7.1% to $195 million in the second quarter of 2015. Underlying the trend in new business premiums was a 1.6% increase in new business policies written in the second quarter of 2016, compared to 5.6% in the second quarter of 2015, while the year-over-year average premium per policy on new business increased 1.2% at June 30, 2016, compared to 3.7% at June 30, 2015. Premiums generated from renewal business increased 6.2% to $1.5 billion in the second quarter of 2016, compared to an increase of 7.7% to $1.4 billion in the second quarter of 2015. Underlying the trend in renewal business premiums was an increase in year-over-year average premium per policy of 3.4% at June 30, 2016, compared to 4.0% at June 30, 2015, and steady policy retention ratios.

Table of Contents

Personal lines – Total personal lines premiums written increased 6.3% to $1.2 billion in the second quarter of 2016, from $1.1 billion in the second quarter of 2015, driven by an increase of 3.6% in total personal lines policies in force and an increase of 2.8% in the total personal lines year-over-year average premium per policy.

Commercial lines – Total commercial lines premiums written increased 4.5% to $497 million in the second quarter of 2016, from $475 million in the second quarter of 2015, driven by a 2.3% increase in total commercial lines policies in force and a 4.6% increase in the total commercial lines year-over-year average premium per policy.

Future trends-premium revenue – The Exchange plans to continue its efforts to grow premiums and improve its competitive position in the marketplace. Expanding the size of its agency force through a careful agency selection process and increased market penetration in our existing operating territories will contribute to future growth as existing and new agents build their books of business.

Changes in premium levels attributable to the growth in policies in force and rate changes directly affect the profitability of the Exchange and have a direct bearing on our management fee. The Exchange's continued focus on underwriting discipline and the maturing of its pricing sophistication models has contributed to its growth in new policies in force, steady policy retention ratios, and increased average premium per policy.

Service agreement revenue

Service agreement revenue includes service charges we collect from policyholders for providing extended payment terms on policies written and assumed by the Exchange, and late payment and policy reinstatement fees. The service charges are fixed dollar amounts per billed installment. Service agreement revenue totaled $7.2 million and $7.4 million in the second quarters of 2016 and 2015, respectively, and $14.5 million and $15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease in service agreement revenue compared to the growth in policies in force reflects the continued shift in policies to the monthly direct debit payment plan, which does not incur service charges, and the no-fee single payment plan, which offers a premium discount. The shift to these plans is driven by the consumers’ desire to avoid paying service charges and to take advantage of the discount in pricing offered for paid-in-full policies.

Cost of management operations



	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2016		2015		% Change		2016		2015		% Change
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Commissions:
Total commissions	$	235,794	$	223,731	5.4	%	$	444,508	$	417,448	6.5	%
Non-commission expense:
Underwriting and policy processing	$	34,674	$	35,035	(1.0	)%	$	68,162	$	67,528	0.9	%
Information technology	28,216		33,118		(14.8	)	56,600		66,240		(14.6	)
Sales and advertising	17,554		17,100		2.7		32,003		31,609		1.2
Customer service	6,279		7,322		(14.3	)	13,308		14,310		(7.0	)
Administrative and other	15,608		15,371		1.5		30,607		32,943		(7.1	)
Total non-commission expense	102,331		107,946		(5.2	)	200,680		212,630		(5.6	)
Total cost of management operations	$	338,125	$	331,677	1.9	%	$	645,188	$	630,078	2.4	%

Commissions – Commissions increased $12.1 million in the second quarter of 2016 and $27.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same respective periods in 2015. The majority of the increases were driven by the 5.8% and 6.4% increases in direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, while approximately one-quarter of the increase for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was due to higher agent incentive costs primarily related to profitable growth, compared to the same respective periods in 2015. The estimated agent incentive payout at June 30, 2016 is based on actual underwriting results for the two prior years and current year-to-date actual results and forecasted results for the remainder of 2016. Therefore, fluctuations in the current quarter underwriting results can impact the estimated incentive payout on a quarter-to-quarter basis.

Non-commission expense – Non-commission expense decreased $5.6 million in the second quarter of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. Information technology costs decreased $4.9 million driven by decreased professional fees and personnel costs. Customer service costs decreased $1.0 million primarily due to decreased credit card processing fees. Personnel costs in all expense categories were impacted by decreased pension costs primarily due to an increase in the pension discount rate.

Table of Contents

Non-commission expense decreased $12.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015. Information technology costs decreased $9.6 million driven by decreased professional fees and personnel costs. Customer service costs decreased $1.0 million primarily due to decreased credit card processing fees. Administrative and other expenses decreased $2.3 million primarily due to decreased personnel costs. Personnel costs in all expense categories were impacted by decreased pension costs primarily due to an increase in the pension discount rate.

Gross margin

The gross margin in the second quarter of 2016 was 20.2% compared to 17.4% in the second quarter of 2015, and was 19.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to 16.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Total Investment Income

A summary of the results of our investment operations is as follows:



(in thousands)	Three months ended June 30,								Six months ended June 30,
	2016		2015			% Change			2016			2015			% Change
	(Unaudited)								(Unaudited)
Net investment income	$	4,891	$	4,435		10.3		%	$	9,553		$	8,976		6.4		%
Net realized investment gains (losses)	399		598			(33.3	)		(689		)	358			NM
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings	0		(35		)	NM			(345		)	(155		)	NM
Equity in earnings of limited partnerships	2,114		10,707			(80.3	)		1,444			13,065			(89.0	)
Total investment income	$	7,404	$	15,705		(52.9	)	%	$	9,963		$	22,244		(55.2	)	%

NM = not meaningful

Net investment income

Net investment income primarily includes interest and dividends on our fixed maturity and equity security portfolios, net of investment expenses.

Net investment income increased by $0.5 million in the second quarter of 2016, compared to the second quarter of 2015, and increased by $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase in net investment income during both periods was primarily due to an increase in the invested balance of fixed maturity securities, partially offset by lower income from equity securities as a result of the sale of our preferred stock holdings in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Net realized investments gains (losses)

A breakdown of our net realized investment gains (losses) is as follows:



(in thousands)	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2016			2015		2016			2015
Securities sold:	(Unaudited)					(Unaudited)
Fixed maturities	$	229		$	236	$	(1,220	)	$	(4	)
Equity securities	0			362		(34		)	362
Common stock equity securities	586			0		586			0
Common stock decreases in fair value⁽¹⁾	(416		)	0		(21		)	0
Net realized investment gains (losses)⁽²⁾	$	399		$	598	$	(689	)	$	358


(1)	The fair value of our common stocks is determined based upon exchange traded prices provided by a nationally recognized pricing service.


(2)	See Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements - Note 5, Investments, of Notes to Financial Statements" contained within this report for additional disclosures regarding net realized investment gains (losses.)

Net realized investment gains and losses include gains and losses resulting from the sales of our fixed maturity or equity securities, as well as changes in fair value of common stocks designated as trading securities.

Net realized gains during the second quarter of 2016 primarily reflected gains from sales of common stock and fixed maturity securities, while net realized gains in the second quarter of 2015 resulted from gains on sales of fixed maturity and preferred equity securities. Net realized losses for the six months ended June 30, 2016 primarily reflected losses from sales of fixed

Table of Contents

maturity securities, partially offset by gains from sales of common stock, while net realized gains for the six months ended June 30, 2015 primarily reflected gains from sales of preferred equity securities.

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

Impairments recorded for both the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were primarily related to several securities in an unrealized loss position where we determined the loss was other-than-temporary based on credit factors.

Equity in earnings of limited partnerships

The components of equity in earnings of limited partnerships are as follows:



(in thousands)	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,
	2016			2015		2016			2015
	(Unaudited)					(Unaudited)
Private equity	$	(488	)	$	9,904	$	(1,797	)	$	10,157
Mezzanine debt	311			350		94			1,137
Real estate	2,291			453		3,147			1,771
Total equity in earnings of limited partnerships	$	2,114		$	10,707	$	1,444		$	13,065

Limited partnership earnings pertain to investments in U.S. and foreign private equity, mezzanine debt, and real estate partnerships. Valuation adjustments are recorded to reflect the changes in fair value of the underlying investments held by the limited partnerships. These adjustments are recorded as a component of equity in earnings of limited partnerships in the Statements of Operations.

Limited partnership earnings tend to be cyclical based upon market conditions, the age of the partnership, and the nature of the investments. Generally, limited partnership earnings are recorded on a quarter lag from financial statements we receive from our general partners. As a consequence, earnings from limited partnerships reported at June 30, 2016 reflect investment valuation changes resulting from the financial markets and the economy in the first quarter of 2016.

Equity in earnings of limited partnerships decreased by $8.6 million in the second quarter of 2016, compared to the second quarter of 2015, and decreased by $11.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the the six months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease in earnings during both periods was primarily due to lower earnings from private equity investments partially offset by higher earnings from real estate investments.

Financial Condition of Erie Insurance Exchange

Serving in the capacity of attorney-in-fact for the Exchange, we are dependent on the growth and financial condition of the Exchange, who is our sole customer. The strength of the Exchange and its wholly owned subsidiaries is rated annually by A.M. Best Company. Higher ratings of insurance companies generally indicate financial stability and a strong ability to pay claims. The ratings are generally based upon factors relevant to policyholders and are not directed toward return to investors. The Exchange and each of its property and casualty subsidiaries are rated A+ "Superior". As of June 30, 2016, the outlook for the financial strength rating is stable. According to A.M. Best, this second highest financial strength rating category is assigned to those companies that, in A.M. Best’s opinion, have achieved superior overall performance when compared to the standards established by A.M. Best and have a superior ability to meet obligations to policyholders over the long term. As of December 31, 2015, only 11% of insurance groups are rated A+ or higher, and the Exchange is included in that group.

The financial statements of the Exchange are prepared in accordance with statutory accounting principles prescribed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Financial statements prepared under statutory accounting principles focus on the solvency of the insurer and generally provide a more conservative approach than under GAAP. Statutory direct written premiums of the Exchange and its wholly owned property and casualty subsidiaries grew 6.4% to $3.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $3.0 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2015. These premiums, along with investment income, are the major sources of cash that support the operations of the Exchange. Policyholders’ surplus, determined under statutory accounting principles, was $7.4 billion at June 30, 2016, $7.1 billion at December 31, 2015, and $7.0 billion at June 30, 2015. The Exchange and its wholly owned property and casualty subsidiaries' year-over-year policy retention ratio continues to be high at 89.8% at June 30, 2016, 89.9% at December 31, 2015, and 90.1% at June 30, 2015.

Table of Contents

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Investments

Our investment portfolio is managed with the objective of maximizing after-tax returns on a risk-adjusted basis.

Distribution of investments



	Carrying value at				Carrying value at
(dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2016		% to total		December 31, 2015		% to total
	(Unaudited)
Fixed maturities	$	644,521	89	%	$	587,209	85	%
Common stock	9,610		1		12,732		2
Limited partnerships:
Private equity	39,917		6		48,397		7
Mezzanine debt	10,355		1		12,701		2
Real estate	20,680		3		27,437		4
Real estate mortgage loans	250		0		333		0
Total investments	$	725,333	100	%	$	688,809	100	%

We continually review our investment portfolio to evaluate positions that might incur other-than-temporary declines in value. For all investment holdings, general economic conditions and/or conditions specifically affecting the underlying issuer or its industry, including downgrades by the major rating agencies, are considered in evaluating impairment in value. In addition to specific factors, other factors considered in our review of investment valuation are the length of time the fair value is below cost and the amount the fair value is below cost.

We individually analyze all positions with emphasis on those that have, in management’s opinion, declined significantly below cost. In compliance with impairment guidance for debt securities, we perform further analysis to determine if a credit-related impairment has occurred. Some of the factors considered in determining whether a debt security is credit impaired include potential for the default of interest and/or principal, level of subordination, collateral of the issue, compliance with financial covenants, credit ratings and industry conditions. We have the intent to sell all credit-impaired debt securities; therefore, the entire amount of the impairment charges is included in earnings and no impairments are recorded in other comprehensive income. For available-for-sale equity securities, a charge is recorded in the Statements of Operations for positions that have experienced other-than-temporary impairments. (See the "Results of Operations" section contained within this report for further information.) Management believes its investment valuation philosophy and accounting practices result in appropriate and timely measurement of value and recognition of impairment.

Fixed maturities

Under our investment strategy, we maintain a fixed maturity portfolio that is of high quality and well diversified within each market sector. This investment strategy also achieves a balanced maturity schedule. Our fixed maturity portfolio is managed with the goal of achieving reasonable returns while limiting exposure to risk. Our municipal bond portfolio accounts for $241.8 million, or 38%, of the total fixed maturity portfolio at June 30, 2016. The overall credit rating of the municipal portfolio without consideration of the underlying insurance is AA+.

Fixed maturities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred taxes, included in shareholders’ equity. Net unrealized gains on fixed maturities, net of deferred taxes, amounted to $9.5 million at June 30, 2016, compared to $3.4 million at December 31, 2015.

Table of Contents

The following table presents a breakdown of the fair value of our fixed maturity portfolio by sector and rating: ⁽¹⁾



	At June 30, 2016
(in thousands)	(Unaudited)
Industry Sector	AAA		AA		A		BBB		Non- investment grade		Fair value
Basic materials	$	0	$	0	$	2,026	$	1,731	$	6,717	$	10,474
Communications	0		0		2,026		8,496		18,153		28,675
Consumer	0		0		2,012		29,712		46,991		78,715
Diversified	0		0		0		0		1,037		1,037
Energy	0		2,038		5,537		5,730		11,166		24,471
Financial	0		2,072		22,445		51,490		15,023		91,030
Government-municipal	112,427		118,253		10,110		1,034		0		241,824
Industrial	0		0		497		4,109		18,215		22,821
Structured securities⁽²⁾	43,499		35,404		17,629		13,919		2,218		112,669
Technology	0		2,018		2,285		4,567		11,641		20,511
Utilities	0		0		5,174		6,042		1,078		12,294
Total	$	155,926	$	159,785	$	69,741	$	126,830	$	132,239	$	644,521


(1)	Ratings are supplied by S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch. The table is based upon the lowest rating for each security.


(2)	Structured securities include residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations, and asset-backed securities.

Common Stock

The following table presents an analysis of the fair value of our common stock securities by sector:



	Fair value at:
(in thousands)	June 30, 2016			December 31, 2015
Industry sector		(Unaudited)
Communications		$	496		$	0
Funds ⁽¹⁾		9,114			12,732
Total		$	9,610		$	12,732


(1)	Includes exchange traded funds with underlying holdings of fixed maturity securities. These securities meet the criteria of a common stock under U.S. GAAP, and are included on the balance sheet as available-for-sale equity securities.

Equity securities classified as available-for-sale include certain common stock securities and are carried at fair value on the Statements of Financial Position with all changes in unrealized gains and losses reflected in other comprehensive income. The net unrealized gain on equity securities classified as available-for-sale, net of deferred taxes, was $0.1 million at June 30, 2016, compared to a net unrealized loss of $0.1 million at December 31, 2015.

Common stocks classified as trading securities are measured at fair value with all changes in fair value reflected in the Statements of Operations.

Limited partnerships

In the second quarter of 2016, investments in limited partnerships decreased from the investment levels at December 31, 2015. Changes in partnership values are a function of contributions and distributions, adjusted for market value changes in the underlying investments. The decrease in limited partnership investments was primarily due to net distributions received from the partnerships. We have made no new limited partnership commitments since 2006, and the balance of limited partnership investments is expected to decline over time as additional distributions are received. The results from our limited partnerships are based upon financial statements received from our general partners, which are generally received on a quarter lag. As a result, the market values and earnings recorded during the second quarter of 2016 reflect the partnership activity experienced in the first quarter of 2016.

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Sources and Uses of Cash

Liquidity is a measure of a company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet the short- and long-term cash requirements of its business operations and growth needs. Our liquidity requirements have been met primarily by funds generated from management fee revenue and income from investments. Cash provided from these sources is used primarily to fund the costs of our management operations including commissions, salaries and wages, pension plans, share repurchases, dividends to shareholders, and the purchase and development of information technology. We expect that our operating cash needs will be met by funds generated from operations.

Volatility in the financial markets presents challenges to us as we do occasionally access our investment portfolio as a source of cash. Some of our fixed income investments, despite being publicly traded, are illiquid. Volatility in these markets could limit our ability to sell certain of our fixed income securities or cause such securities to sell at deep discounts. Additionally, our limited partnership investments are significantly less liquid. We believe we have sufficient liquidity to meet our needs from other sources even if market volatility persists throughout 2016.

Cash flow activities

The following table provides condensed cash flow information for the six months ended June 30:



(in thousands)	2016			2015
	(Unaudited)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	50,482		$	41,878
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(41,267		)	6,384
Net cash used in financing activities	(67,993		)	(63,429		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(58,778	)	$	(15,167	)

Net cash provided by operating activities was $50.5 million in the first six months of 2016, compared to $41.9 million in the first six months of 2015. Increased cash from operating activities for the first six months of 2016 was primarily due to an increase in management fee revenue received combined with lower general operating expenses paid. Somewhat offsetting this increase in cash provided was an increase in commissions and bonuses paid to agents, salaries and wages and employee benefits paid compared to the first six months of 2015. Management fee revenues were higher reflecting the increase in direct and assumed premiums written by the Exchange. Cash paid for agent commissions and bonuses increased to $471.1 million in the first six months of 2016, compared to $436.2 million in the first six months of 2015, as a result of an increase in cash paid for bonus awards due to profitable underwriting results and an increase in scheduled commissions due to premium growth. We contributed $17.4 million to our pension plan in the first quarter of 2016, compared to $17.0 million in the first quarter of 2015. Our funding policy is generally to contribute an amount equal to the greater of the target normal cost for the plan year or the amount necessary to fund the plan to 100% plus interest to the date the contribution is made. We are reimbursed approximately 58% of the net periodic benefit cost of the pension plans from the Exchange, which represents pension benefits for our employees performing claims and life insurance functions. At June 30, 2016, we recorded a net deferred tax asset of $35.8 million. There was no deferred tax valuation allowance recorded at June 30, 2016.

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $41.3 million in the first six months of 2016, compared to cash provided of $6.4 million in the first six months of 2015. While cash generated from the sale of available-for-sale securities was higher in the first six months of 2016, compared to the first six months of 2015, increases in purchases of available-for-sale securities, coupled with less cash generated from the return of capital from limited partnerships, contributed to net cash being used for the first six months of 2016. Also impacting our future investing activities are limited partnership commitments, which totaled $18.9 million at June 30, 2016, and will be funded as required by the partnerships’ agreements. Of this amount, the total remaining commitment to fund limited partnerships that invest in private equity securities was $7.2 million, mezzanine debt securities was $8.4 million and real estate activities was $3.3 million.

Net cash used in financing activities totaled $68.0 million in the first six months of 2016, compared to $63.4 million in the first six months of 2015, all of which was related to dividends paid to shareholders. We increased both our Class A and Class B shareholder regular quarterly dividends by 7.2% for 2016, compared to 2015. There are no regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our shareholders.

No shares of our Class A nonvoting common stock were repurchased in the first six months of 2016 and 2015 in conjunction with our stock repurchase program. In October 2011, our Board of Directors approved a continuation of the current stock repurchase program for a total of $150 million with no time limitation. This repurchase authority includes, and is not in

Table of Contents

addition to, any unspent amounts remaining under the prior authorization. We had approximately $17.8 million of repurchase authority remaining under this program at June 30, 2016, based upon trade date.

In May 2016, we purchased 2,041 shares of our outstanding Class A nonvoting common stock outside of our publicly announced share repurchase program at a total cost of $193,349, or $94.73 per share, to fund the rabbi trust for the outside director deferred compensation plan. These shares were transferred to the rabbi trust in May 2016.

In May and June 2016, we purchased 7,661 shares of our outstanding Class A nonvoting common stock outside of our publicly announced share repurchase program at a total cost of $752,309, or $98.20 per share, for the vesting of stock-based awards in conjunction with our long-term incentive plan. These shares were delivered to plan participants in June 2016.

In June 2015, we purchased 1,567 shares of our outstanding Class A nonvoting common stock outside of our publicly announced share repurchase program at a total cost of $128,355, or $81.91 per share, for the vesting of stock-based awards in conjunction with our long-term incentive plan. These shares were delivered to plan participants in June 2015.

Capital Outlook

We regularly prepare forecasts evaluating the current and future cash requirements for both normal and extreme risk events. Should an extreme risk event result in a cash requirement exceeding normal cash flows, we have the ability to meet our future funding requirements through various alternatives available to us.

Outside of our normal operating and investing cash activities, future funding requirements could be met through:

1) cash and cash equivalents, which total approximately $124.1 million at June 30, 2016, 2) a $100 million bank revolving line of credit, and 3) liquidation of assets held in our investment portfolio, including common stock and investment grade bonds which totaled approximately $410.8 million at June 30, 2016. Volatility in the financial markets could impair our ability to sell certain fixed income securities or cause such securities to sell at deep discounts. Additionally, we have the ability to curtail or modify discretionary cash outlays such as those related to shareholder dividends and share repurchase activities.

As of June 30, 2016, we have access to a $100 million bank revolving line of credit with a $25 million letter of credit sublimit that expires on November 3, 2020. As of June 30, 2016, a total of $99.0 million remains available under the facility due to $1.0 million outstanding letters of credit, which reduce the availability for letters of credit to $24.0 million. We had no borrowings outstanding on our line of credit as of June 30, 2016. Bonds with a fair value of $111.1 million were pledged as collateral on the line at June 30, 2016. These securities have no trading restrictions and are reported as available-for-sale securities in the Statements of Financial Position. The bank requires compliance with certain covenants, which include leverage ratios. We were in compliance with our bank covenants at June 30, 2016.

Balance Sheet Arrangements

Off-balance sheet arrangements include those with unconsolidated entities that may have a material current or future effect on our financial condition or results of operations, including material variable interests in unconsolidated entities that conduct certain activities. We have no material off-balance sheet obligations or guarantees, other than limited partnership investment commitments.

Surplus Note

We hold a surplus note for $25 million from EFL that is payable on demand on or after December 31, 2018; however, no principal or interest payments may be made without prior approval by the Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner. Interest payments are scheduled to be paid semi-annually. For each of the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, we recognized interest income on the note of $0.8 million.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

We make estimates and assumptions that have a significant effect on the amounts and disclosures reported in the financial statements. The most significant estimates relate to investment valuation and retirement benefit plans for employees. While management believes its estimates are appropriate, the ultimate amounts may differ from estimates provided. Our most critical accounting estimates are described in Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for the year ended December 31, 2015 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2016. See Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements - Note 4, Fair Value, of Notes to Financial Statements" contained within this report for additional information on our valuation of investments.

Table of Contents


ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our exposure to market risk is primarily related to fluctuations in prices and interest rates. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk resulting from changes in prices, interest rates, and other risk exposures for the year ended December 31, 2015 are included in Item 7A. "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk", of our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2016.

There have been no material changes that impact our portfolio or reshape our periodic investment reviews of asset allocations during the six months ended June 30, 2016. For a recent discussion of conditions surrounding our investment portfolio, see the "Operating Overview", "Results of Operations", and "Financial Condition" discussions contained in Part I, Item 2. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" contained within this report.


ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We carried out an evaluation, with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Our management evaluated, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, any change in our internal control over financial reporting and determined there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the six months ended June 30, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

State Court Lawsuit Against Erie Indemnity Company

Erie Indemnity Company (“Indemnity”) was named as a defendant in a complaint filed on August 1, 2012 by alleged subscribers of the Erie Insurance Exchange (the “Exchange”) in the Court of Common Pleas Civil Division of Fayette County, Pennsylvania captioned Erie Insurance Exchange, an unincorporated association, by Joseph S. Sullivan and Anita Sullivan, Patricia R. Beltz, and Jenna L. DeBord, trustees ad litem v. Erie Indemnity Co. (the “Sullivan” lawsuit).

As subsequently amended, the complaint alleges that, beginning on September 1, 1997, Indemnity retained “Service Charges” (installment fees) and “Added Service Charges” (late fees and policy reinstatement charges) on policies written by the Exchange and its insurance subsidiaries, which allegedly should have been paid to the Exchange, in the amount of approximately $308 million. In addition to their claim for monetary relief on behalf of the Exchange, the plaintiffs seek an accounting of all so-called intercompany transactions between Indemnity and the Exchange from 1996 to date. Plaintiffs allege that Indemnity breached its contractual, fiduciary, and equitable duties by retaining Service Charges and Added Service Charges that should have been retained by the Exchange. Plaintiffs bring these same claims under three separate derivative-type theories. First, plaintiffs purport to bring suit as members of the Exchange on behalf of the Exchange. Second, plaintiffs purport to bring suit as trustees ad litem on behalf of the Exchange. Third, plaintiffs purport to bring suit on behalf of the Exchange pursuant to Rule 1506 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, which allows shareholders to bring suit derivatively on behalf of a corporation or similar entity.

Indemnity filed a motion in the state court in November 2012 seeking dismissal of the lawsuit. On December 19, 2013, the court granted Indemnity’s motion in part, holding that the Pennsylvania Insurance Holding Company Act “provides the [Pennsylvania Insurance] Department with special competence to address the subject matter of plaintiff’s claims” and referring “all issues” in the Sullivan lawsuit to the Pennsylvania Insurance Department (the “Department”) for “its views and any determination.” The court stayed all further proceedings and reserved decision on all other grounds for dismissal raised by Indemnity. Plaintiffs sought reconsideration of the court’s order, and on January 13, 2014, the court entered a revised order affirming its prior order and clarifying that the Department “shall decide any and all issues within its jurisdiction.” On January 30, 2014, Plaintiffs asked the court to certify its order to permit an immediate appeal to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania and to stay any proceedings in the Department pending completion of any appeal. On February 18, 2014, the court issued an order denying Plaintiffs’ motion. On March 20, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a petition for review with the Superior Court, which was denied by the Superior Court on May 5, 2014.

The Sullivan matter was assigned to an Administrative Judge within the Department for determination. The parties agreed that an evidentiary hearing was not required and they entered into a stipulated record and submitted briefing to the Department. Oral argument was held before the Administrative Judge on January 6, 2015. On April 29, 2015, the Department issued a declaratory opinion and order (1) finding that the transactions between Exchange and Indemnity in which Indemnity retained or received revenue from installment and other service charges from Exchange subscribers complied with applicable insurance laws and regulations and that Indemnity properly retained charges paid by Exchange policyholders for certain installment premium payment plans, dishonored payments, policy cancellations and policy reinstatements and (2) returning jurisdiction over the matter to the Fayette County Court of Common Pleas.

On May 26, 2015, Plaintiffs appealed the Department’s decision to the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court. Oral argument was held before the Commonwealth Court en banc on December 9, 2015. On January 27, 2016, the Commonwealth Court issued an opinion vacating the Department’s ruling and directing the Department to return the case to the Court of Common Pleas, essentially holding that the primary jurisdiction referral of the trial court was improper at this time because the allegations of the complaint do not implicate the special competency of the Department.

On February 26, 2016, Indemnity filed a petition for allowance of appeal to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court seeking further review of the Commonwealth Court opinion. On March 14, 2016, Plaintiffs filed an answer opposing Indemnity’s petition for allowance of appeal; and, on March 28, 2016, Indemnity sought permission to file a reply brief in further support of its petition for allowance of appeal. Indemnity is currently awaiting action by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on its petition for allowance of appeal.

Indemnity believes that it continues to have meritorious legal and factual defenses to the Sullivan lawsuit and intends to vigorously defend against all allegations and requests for relief.

Table of Contents

Federal Court Lawsuit Against Directors

On February 6, 2013, a lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, captioned Erie Insurance Exchange, an unincorporated association, by members Patricia R. Beltz, Joseph S. Sullivan and Anita Sullivan, and Patricia R. Beltz, on behalf of herself and others similarly situate v. Richard L. Stover; J. Ralph Borneman, Jr; Terrence W. Cavanaugh; Jonathan Hirt Hagen; Susan Hirt Hagen; Thomas B. Hagen; C. Scott Hartz; Claude C. Lilly, III; Lucian L. Morrison; Thomas W. Palmer; Martin P. Sheffield; Elizabeth H. Vorsheck; and Robert C. Wilburn (the “Beltz” lawsuit), by alleged policyholders of the Exchange who are also the plaintiffs in the Sullivan lawsuit. The individuals named as defendants in the Beltz lawsuit were the then-current Directors of Indemnity.

As subsequently amended, the Beltz lawsuit asserts many of the same allegations and claims for monetary relief as in the Sullivan lawsuit. Plaintiffs purport to sue on behalf of all policyholders of the Exchange, or, alternatively, on behalf of the Exchange itself. Indemnity filed a motion to intervene as a Party Defendant in the Beltz lawsuit in July 2013, and the Directors filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit in August 2013. On February 10, 2014, the court entered an order granting Indemnity’s motion to intervene and permitting Indemnity to join the Directors’ motion to dismiss; granting in part the Directors’ motion to dismiss; referring the matter to the Department to decide any and all issues within its jurisdiction; denying all other relief sought in the Directors’ motion as moot; and dismissing the case without prejudice. To avoid duplicative proceedings and expedite the Department’s review, the Parties stipulated that only the Sullivan action would proceed before the Department and any final and non-appealable determinations made by the Department in the Sullivan action will be applied to the Beltz action.

On March 7, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Indemnity filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on March 26, 2014. On November 17, 2014, the Third Circuit deferred ruling on Indemnity’s motion to dismiss the appeal and instructed the parties to address that motion, as well as the merits of Plaintiffs’ appeal, in the parties’ briefing. Briefing was completed on April 2, 2015. In light of the Department’s April 29, 2015 decision in Sullivan, the Parties then jointly requested that the Beltz appeal be voluntarily dismissed as moot on June 5, 2015. The Third Circuit did not rule on the Parties’ request for dismissal and instead held oral argument as scheduled on June 8, 2015. On July 16, 2015, the Third Circuit issued an opinion and judgment dismissing the appeal. The Third Circuit found that it lacked appellate jurisdiction over the appeal, because the District Court’s February 10, 2014 order referring the matter to the Department was not a final, appealable order.

On July 8, 2016, the Beltz plaintiffs filed a new action labeled as a “Verified Derivative And Class Action Complaint” in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The action is captioned Patricia R. Beltz, Joseph S. Sullivan, and Anita Sullivan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant Erie Insurance Exchange v. Erie Indemnity Company; Kaj Ahlmann; John T. Baily; Samuel P. Black, III; J. Ralph Borneman, Jr.; Terrence W. Cavanaugh; Wilson C. Cooney; LuAnn Datesh; Patricia A. Goldman; Jonathan Hirt Hagen; Thomas B. Hagen; C. Scott Hartz; Samuel P. Katz; Gwendolyn King; Claude C. Lilly, III; Martin J. Lippert; George R. Lucore; Jeffrey A. Ludrof; Edmund J. Mehl; Henry N. Nassau; Thomas W. Palmer; Martin P. Sheffield; Seth E. Schofield; Richard L. Stover; Jan R. Van Gorder; Elizabeth A. Hirt Vorsheck; Harry H. Weil; and Robert C. Wilburn (the “New Beltz” lawsuit). The individual defendants are all present or former Directors of Indemnity (the “Directors”).

The allegations of the New Beltz lawsuit arise from the same fundamental, underlying claims as the Sullivan and prior Beltz litigation, i.e., that Indemnity improperly retained Service Charges and Added Service Charges. The New Beltz lawsuit alleges that the retention of the Service Charges and Added Service Charges was improper because, for among other reasons, that retention constituted a breach of the Subscriber’s Agreement and an Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing by Indemnity, breaches of fiduciary duty by Indemnity and the other defendants, conversion by Indemnity, and unjust enrichment by defendants Jonathan Hirt Hagen, Thomas B. Hagen, Elizabeth A. Hirt Vorsheck, and Samuel P. Black, III, at the expense of the Exchange. The New Beltz lawsuit requests, among other things, that a judgment be entered against the Defendants certifying the action as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; declaring plaintiffs as representatives of the Class and plaintiffs’ counsel as counsel for the Class; declaring the conduct alleged as unlawful, including, but not limited to, Defendants retention of the Service Charges and Added Service Charges; enjoining defendants from continuing to retain the Service Charges and Added Service Charges; and awarding compensatory and punitive damages and interest.

Indemnity believes it has meritorious legal and factual defenses and intends to vigorously defend against all allegations and requests for relief in the New Beltz lawsuit. Directors have advised Indemnity that they intend to vigorously defend against the claims in the New Beltz lawsuit and have sought indemnification and advancement of expenses from the Company in connection with the New Beltz lawsuit.

For additional information on contingencies, see Part I, Item 1. "Financial Statements - Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies, of Notes to Financial Statements".

Table of Contents


ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2016.


ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In October 2011, our Board of Directors approved a continuation of the current stock repurchase program, authorizing repurchases for a total of $150 million with no time limitation. This repurchase authority included, and was not in addition to, any unspent amounts remaining under the prior authorization. There were no repurchases of our Class A common stock under this program during the quarter ending June 30, 2016. We had approximately $17.8 million of repurchase authority remaining under this program at June 30, 2016.

During the quarter ending June 30, 2016, we purchased 9,702 shares of our outstanding Class A nonvoting common stock outside of our publicly announced share repurchase program at a total cost of $945,658, or $97.47 per share, to fund the rabbi trust for the outside director deferred compensation plan and for the vesting of stock-based awards in conjunction with our long-term incentive plan. The rabbi trust shares were transferred to the trust in May 2016 and the long-term incentive plan shares were delivered to plan participants in June 2016.

Table of Contents


ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS



Exhibit
Number		Description of Exhibit

14.4		Revised Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, effective June 1, 2016. Such exhibit is incorporated by reference to the like titled exhibit in the Registrant's Form 8-K that was filed with the Commission on June 1, 2016.

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32*		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

* Filed herewith.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



			Erie Indemnity Company
			(Registrant)


Date:	July 28, 2016	By:	/s/ Terrence W. Cavanaugh
			Terrence W. Cavanaugh, President & CEO

		By:	/s/ Gregory J. Gutting
			Gregory J. Gutting, Interim Executive Vice President & CFO

Erie Indemnity - 10-Q quarterly report FY2016 Q2

What is the market capitalization of a company?

DISCLAIMER

Contact

Links