Companies:
10,652
total market cap:
$140.549 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Envela Corporation
ELA
#7858
Rank
$0.33 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$12.85
Share price
0.47%
Change (1 day)
93.52%
Change (1 year)
Recommerce
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
Annual Reports (10-K)
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Envela Corporation
Annual Reports (10-K)
Submitted on 2009-03-31
Envela Corporation - 10-K annual report
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File No. 001-11048
_______________________________
DGSE COMPANIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
88-0097334
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
11311 Reeder Road
Dallas, Texas 75229
972-484-3662
(Address, including zip code, and telephone
number, including area code, of registrant's
principal executive offices)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
(Title of Class)
_______________________________
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
YES
o
NO
þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
YES
o
NO
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES
þ
NO
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or smaller reporting company. See definitions of “larger accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller Reporting Company
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES
o
NO
þ
Aggregate market value of the 3,774,762 shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates
of the registrant at the closing sales price as reported on the
NYSE Amex
on June 30, 2008
$11,022,305
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on
March 27, 2009:
9,833,635
Documents incorporated by reference:
Portions of the definitive proxy statement relating to the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of DGSE Companies, Inc. are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I
Item 1.
Business
1
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
8
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
14
Item 2.
Properties
14
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
14
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
15
Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
17
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
20
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
21
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
21
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
22
Item 9B.
Other Information
22
PART III
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
22
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
23
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
.
Overview
Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to "we," "us", "our" and ”DGSE” refers to the consolidated business operations of DGSE Companies, Inc., the parent, and all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries.
We buy and sell jewelry, bullion products and rare coins. Our customers include individual consumer, dealers and institutions throughout the United States. In addition, we make collateralized loans to individuals in the State of Texas. Our products and services are marketed through our facilities in Dallas and Euless, Texas; Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina; Woodland Hills, California and through our internet web sites DGSE.com; CGDEi
nc.com; SGBH
.com; SuperiorPreciousMetals.com; SuperiorEstateBuyers.com; USBullionExchange.com; Americangoldandsilverexchange.com; and FairchildWatches.com.
We operate eight primary internet sites and over 900 related landing sites on the World Wide Web. Through the various sites we operate a virtual store, real-time auction of rare coin and jewelry products, free quotations of current prices on all commonly traded precious metal and related products, trading in precious metals, a mechanism for selling unwanted jewelry, rare coins and precious metals and wholesale prices and information exclusively for dealers on pre-owned fine watches. Over 7,500 items are available for sale on our internet sites including $2,000,000 in diamonds.
Our wholly-owned subsidiary, National Jewelry Exchange, Inc, (dba National Pawn), operates two pawn shops in
Dallas
,
Texas
. We have focused the subsidiary’s operations on sales and pawn loans of jewelry products.
On May 9, 2007 we purchased all of the tangible assets of Euless Gold and Silver, Inc., located in
Euless
,
Texas
. We opened a new retail store in the former Euless Gold & Silver facility and
it
operate
s
under the name of Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange.
On May 30, 2007, we completed the acquisition of Superior Galleries, Inc. located in
Beverly Hills
,
California
. In June 2008, we moved Superior Galleries operations from
Beverly Hills
to
Woodland Hills
,
California
.
Superior
’s principal line of business is the sale of rare coins on a retail and wholesale basis.
Superior
’s retail and wholesale operations are conducted in virtually every state in the
United States
.
Superior
also conducted live and internet auctions for customers seeking to sell their own coins prior to management’s decision to discontinue the live auction operations.
Superior
markets its services nationwide through broadcast and print media and independent sales agents, as well as on the internet through third party websites, and through its own website at SGBH.com.
On July 13, 2007, we sold the loan balances from our American Pay Day Center locations and discontinued operations in those locations.
On August 3, 2007 we announced the launch of Americangoldandsilverexchange.com along with the simultaneous activation of over 900 proprietary Internet sites related to the home page of Americangoldandsilverexchange.com. This site, along with our existing locations in Texas, California and South Carolina, provides customers from all over the United States with a seamless and secure way to value and sell gold, silver, rare coins, jewelry, diamonds and watches.
Late in 2007, Superior Estate Buyers was launched to bring our unique expertise in the purchase of gold, silver, diamonds, rare coins and other collectibles to local markets with a team of traveling professionals for short-term buying events. During 2008 Superior Estate Buyers held approximately 24 such buying events. It is our expectation that, over time, this activity will be expanded significantly with the objective of having teams conducting events on a continuous basis.
Superior Precious Metals was also launched in late 2007 and it is the retail precious metals arm of DGSE. Professional account managers provide a convenient way for individuals and companies to buy and sell precious metals and rare coins. This activity is supported by the internally developed account management and trading platform created as part of DGSE’s USBullionExchange.com precious metals system.
2
Products and Services
Our jewelry operations include sales to both wholesale and retail customers. We sell finished jewelry, gem stones, and findings (gold jewelry components) and make custom jewelry to order. Jewelry inventory is readily available from wholesalers throughout the United States. In addition, we purchase inventory from pawn shops and individuals. Jewelry repair is also available to our customers in our Dallas and Euless, Texas, Woodland Hills, California and Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina locations.
Our bullion and rare coin trading operations buy and sell all forms of precious metals products including United States and other government coins, medallions, art bars and trade unit bars. Bullion and rare coin transactions are conducted at all of our store locations.
Bullion and rare coin products are purchased and sold based on current market price. The availability of precious metal products is a function of price as virtually all bullion items are actively traded. Precious metals sales amounted to 43.2% of total revenues for 2008, 33.6% in 2007 and 36.9% in 2006.
During December 2000 we opened a jewelry super store located in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. The store operates through a wholly owned subsidiary, Charleston Gold and Diamond Exchange, Inc. (“CGDE”). CGDE operates in a leased facility located in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina.
We make pawn loans through our National Pawn locations. Pawn loans ("loans") are made on the pledge of tangible personal property, primarily jewelry, for one month with an automatic sixty-day extension period ("loan term"). Pawn service charges are recorded on a constant yield basis over the loan term. If the loan is not repaid, the principal amount loaned plus accrued pawn service charges become the carrying value of the forfeited collateral and are transferred to inventory.
Our primary presence on the internet is through our websites DGSE.com, CGDEinc.com, SGBH.com, Superiorpreciousmetals.com, Superiorestatebuyers.com, USBullionexchange.com, Americangoldandsilvereschange.com, and Fairchildwatches.com. The DGSE.com web site serves as a corporate information site, a retail store where we sell our products and an auction site for jewelry and other products. The internet store functions as a CyberCashTm authorized site which allows customers to purchase products automatically and securely on line. Auctions close at least five times per week. ..
The SGBH.com website services as a primary rare coin marketing site and includes a retail store and conducts regular online auctions.
Americangoldandsilverexchange.com provides customers from all over the United States with a simple and secure method to sell unwanted valuables by sending them directly to our corporate facilities for evaluation. Customers are provided with a firm purchase price which they can reject or accept for immediate payment.
Our internet activity also includes a web site, USBullionExchange.com, which allows customers unlimited access to current quotations for prices on approximately 200 precious metals, coins and other bullion related products. This web site allows customers to enter immediate real-time buy and sell orders in dozens of precious metal products. This functionality allows our customers to fix prices in real time and to manage their precious metals portfolios in a comprehensive way.
We also offer wholesale customers a virtual catalog of our fine watch inventory through our web site Fairchildwatches.com.
During the first half of 2009 all of the active websites are being redesigned, expanded and integrated.
We did not have any customer or supplier that accounted for more than 10% of total sales or purchases during 2008, 2007 or 2006.
3
Sales and Marketing
All of our activities rely heavily on local television, radio and print media advertising. Marketing activities emphasize our broad and unusual array of products and services and the attractiveness of its pricing and service.
We market our bullion and rare coin trading services through a combination of advertising in national coin publications, local print media, coin and bullion wire services and our internet web site. Trades are primarily with coin and bullion dealers on a "cash on confirmation" basis which is prevalent in the industry. Cash on confirmation means that once credit is approved the buyer remits funds by mail or wire concurrently with the mailing of the precious metals. Customer orders for bullion or rare coin trades are customarily delivered within three days of the order or upon clearance of funds depending on the customer's credit standing. Our backlogs for fabricated jewelry products were not significant as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Seasonality
The retail and wholesale jewelry business is seasonal. We realized 22.2%, 37.2% and 27.7% of our annual sales in the fourth quarters of 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
While our bullion and rare coin business is not seasonal, management believes it is directly impacted by the perception of inflation trends. Historically, anticipation of increases in the rate of inflation has resulted in higher levels of interest in precious metals as well as higher prices for such metals. Our other business activities are not seasonal.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive industry where competition is based on a combination of price, service and product quality. Our jewelry and consumer loan activities compete with numerous other retail jewelers and consumer lenders in Dallas and Euless, Texas; Woodland Hills, California; and Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina and the surrounding areas.
The bullion and rare coin industry in which we compete is dominated by substantially larger enterprises which wholesale bullion, rare coin and other precious metal products.
We attempt to compete in all of our activities by offering high quality products and services at prices below that of our competitors and by maintaining a staff of highly qualified employees.
Employees
As of December 31, 2008, we employed 102 individuals, 96 of whom were full time employees.
Available Information
Our website is located at
www.dgse.com
. Through this website, we make available free of charge all of our Securities and Exchange Commission filings. In addition, a complete copy of our Code of Ethics is available through this website.
4
Discontinued Operations and Acquisitions
Discontinued Operations.
In
December
2008 we decided
to discontinue the live auction segment of the Company’s business activities. This decision was based on the substantial losses being incurred by this operating segment during 2008 and 2007. As a result, the operating results of the auction segment have been reclassified to discontinued operations for both 2008 and 2007. During 2008 the auction segment incurred a pretax loss of $2,379,151.
On July 13, 2007, we sold the loan balances from our American Pay Day Center locations for $77,496 and discontinued operations in those locations. The receivables sold, including interest due, had a balance of $120,573 at the time of the sale. The sales price was determined based on the age of the outstanding receivables. As a result of the sale and discontinued operations, we recognized a pretax loss of $107,838 on the disposal and a pretax loss on discontinued operations of $51,938 for the year ended December 31, 2007.
As a result, operating results from these business segments have been reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented. As of December 31, 2008 there were no operating assets to be disposed of or liabilities to be paid in completing the disposition of these operations.
Acquisitions.
Superior Galleries, Inc.
On May 30, 2007, we completed our acquisition of Superior Galleries, Inc., which we refer to as Superior, pursuant to an amended and restated agreement and plan of merger and reorganization dated as of January 6, 2007, which we refer to as the merger agreement, with Superior and Stanford International Bank Ltd., then Superior’s largest stockholder and its principal lender, which we refer to as Stanford, as stockholder agent for the Superior stockholders, whereby Superior
became a wholly owned subsidiary of DGSE Companies, Inc.
Superior
operated
a store in
Beverly Hills
,
CA
.
The total purchase price of approximately $13.6 million was broken down as follows:
Shares
Stock Price
Extended Price
Common stock
3,669,067
$
2.55
$
9,356,121
A warrants
845,634
1.27
(1)
1,073,955
B warrants
863,000
2.55
2,220,650
Exercise Price B warrants
863,000
$
.001
(863
)
Direct transaction costs
1,176,290
Total purchase price
$
13,806,153
(1)
The $1.27 is the fair value of the warrants calculated under the Black Sholes method
as of the acquisition date
.
The total purchase price has been allocated to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:
Goodwill
$
8,203,448
Intangible assets
2,521,340
Deferred tax asset
1,860,475
(1)
Property and other assets
1,068,958
Inventory
3,260,766
Liabilities assumed
(3,108,834
)
Total purchase price
$
13,806,153
(1)
Subsequent to date of acquisition the Company recorded an adjustment to reduce goodwill and increase deferred tax assets to reflect the change in estimated fair value of the net operating loss carryforwards acquired in the Superior acquisition.
In accordance with SFAS 142, the goodwill will not be amortized but instead tested for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142 at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events.
5
During 2008, the Company reflected $8,185,443 of goodwill relating to the acquisition of Superior Galleries. Inc. in May 2007. Under SFAS No. 142, the Company is required to undertake an annual impairment test at its year end or when there is a triggering event. In addition to the annual impairment review, there were a number of triggering events in the fourth quarter due to the significant operating losses of Superior and the impact of the economic downturn on Superior’s operations and the decline in the Company’s share price resulting in a substantial discount of the market capitalization to tangible net asset value. An evaluation of the recorded goodwill was undertaken and it was determined that it was impaired. Accordingly, to reflect the impairment, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $8,185,443, which eliminated the value of the goodwill related to Superior.
The operating results of Superior have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date of May 30, 2007. The following unaudited condensed consolidated financial information reflects the pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 as if the acquisition of Superior had occurred on January 1 of 2007 after giving effect to purchase accounting adjustments as compared to actual results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the effects of the discontinued operations related to the live auction segment. The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of what
operating results would have been had the acquisition actually taken place at the beginning of the period, and may not be indicative of future operating results (in thousands, except per share data):
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)
2008
2007
(Unaudited)
Pro Forma
To
tal revenue
$
105,219
$
72,067
N
et earnings (loss)
$
(7,851
)
$
(2,
920
)
N
et earnings per share — basic
$
(.81
)
$
(.33
)
N
et earnings per share — diluted
$
(.81
)
$
(.33
)
W
eighted average shares — basic
9,708
8,582
W
eighted average shares — diluted
9,708
10,353
In relation to the acquisition, as of June 29, 2007, Stanford and Dr. L.S. Smith, our chairman and chief executive officer, collectively had the power to vote approximately 63% of our voting securities, and beneficially owned approximately 56.4% of our voting securities on a fully-diluted basis (after giving effect to the exercise of all options and warrants held by them which are exercisable within sixty days of
December 31
, 2007
but not giving effect to the exercise of any other options or warrants). Consequently, these two stockholders have sufficient voting power to control the outcome of virtually all corporate matters submitted to
the
vote of our common stockholders. Those matters could include the election of directors, changes in the size and composition of our board of directors, mergers and other business combinations involving us, or the liquidation of our company. In addition, Stanford and Dr. Smith have entered into a corporate governance agreement with us, which entitles Stanford and Dr. Smith to each nominate two “independent” directors to our board and entitles Dr. Smith, our chairman and chief executive officer, and William H. Oyster, our president and chief operating officer, to be nominated to our board for so long as each remains an executive officer.
Through this control of company nominations to our board of directors and through their voting power, Stanford and Dr. Smith are able to exercise substantial control over certain decisions, including decisions regarding the qualification and appointment of officers, dividend policy, access to capital (including borrowing from third-party lenders and the issuance of additional equity securities), a merger or consolidation with another company, and our acquisition or disposition of assets. Also, the concentration of voting power in the hands of Stanford and Dr. Smith could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company, even if the change in control would benefit our other stockholders. The significant concentration of stock ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock due to investors’ perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.
6
Euless Gold & Silver, Inc.
On May 9, 2007 we purchased all of the tangible assets of Euless Gold and Silver, Inc., located in
Euless
,
Texas
. The purchase price paid for these assets totaled $1,000,000 including $600,000 in cash and a two year note in the amount of $400,000. We opened a new retail store in the former Euless Gold & Silver facility and operate under the name of Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange. Of the assets received, $990,150 was inventory and the remainder was fixed assets.
We entered into these transactions seeing them as opportunistic acquisitions that would allow us to expand our operations and provide a platform for future growth.
7
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. We believe these are all the material risks currently facing our business. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. You should also refer to the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report, including our financial statements and related notes.
Changes in customer demand for our products and services could result in a significant decrease in revenues.
Although our customer base commonly uses our products and services, our failure to meet changing demands of our customers could result in a significant decrease in our revenues.
Changes in governmental rules and regulations applicable to the specialty financial services industry could have a negative impact on our lending activities.
Our lending is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and licensing requirements under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations. New laws and regulations could be enacted that could have a negative impact on our lending activities.
Fluctuations in our inventory turnover and sales.
We regularly experience fluctuations in our inventory balances, inventory turnover and sales margins, yields on loan portfolios and pawn redemption rates. Changes in any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our profitability and ability to achieve our planned results.
Changes in our liquidity and capital requirements could limit our ability to achieve our plans.
We require continued access to capital, and a significant reduction in cash flows from operations or the availability of credit could materially and adversely affect our ability to achieve our planned growth and operating results. Similarly, if actual costs to build new stores significantly exceeds planned costs, our ability to build new stores or to operate new stores profitably could be materially restricted. The DGSE credit agreement also limits the allowable amount of capital expenditures in any given fiscal year, which could limit our ability to build new stores.
Changes in competition from various sources could have a material adverse impact on our ability to achieve our plans.
We encounter significant competition in connection with our retail and lending operations from other pawnshops, cash advance companies and other forms of financial institutions and other retailers, many of which have significantly greater financial resources than us. Significant increases in these competitive influences could adversely affect our operations through a decrease in the number or quality pawn loans or our ability to liquidate forfeited collateral at acceptable margins.
In the coins and other collectibles business, we will compete with a number of comparably sized and smaller firms, as well as a number of larger firms throughout the
United States
. Our primary competitors are American Numismatic Rarities, a comparably-sized coin auctioneer. Many of our competitors have the ability to attract customers as a result of their reputation and the quality collectibles they obtain through their industry connections. Additionally, other reputable companies that sell rare coins and other collectibles may decide to enter our markets to compete with us. These companies have greater name recognition and have greater financial and marketing resources than we do. If these auction companies are successful in entering the specialized market for premium collectibles in which we participate or if dealers and sellers participate less in our auctions, we may attract fewer buyers and our revenue could decrease.
8
Our earnings could be negatively impacted by an unfavorable outcome of litigation, regulatory actions, or labor and employment matters.
From time to time, we are involved in litigation, regulatory actions and labor and employment matters arising from our normal operations. There can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of any future actions and that they will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
A failure in our information systems could prevent us from effectively managing and controlling our business or serving our customers.
We rely on our information systems to manage and operate our stores and business. Each store is part of an information network that permits us to maintain adequate cash inventory, reconcile cash balances daily and report revenues and expenses timely. Any disruption in the availability of our information systems could adversely affect our operation, the ability to serve our customers and our results of operations.
A failure of our internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures
in accordance
with the requirements of section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse impact on us and our investors’ confidence in our reported financial information.
Effective internal controls and disclosure controls and processes are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and to detect and prevent fraud.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, m
anagement assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework.
Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles based on such criteria.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all errors or all instances of fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and any design may not succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitation of a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
If
there is a failure in any of our controls as required by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
that leads to a material misstatement of our financial condition
, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information.
9
Changes in general economic conditions could negatively affect loan performance and demand for our products and services.
A sustained deterioration in the economic environment could adversely affect our operations by reducing consumer demand for the products we sell.
Interest rate fluctuations could increase our interest expense.
Although the U.S. Federal Reserve halted a sustained period of regular interest rate hikes in August 2006, interest rates could rise which would, in turn, increase our cost of borrowing.
Our success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate management and other skilled employees.
Our future success and growth depend on the continued services of our key management and employees. The loss of the services of any of these individuals or any other key employee or contractor could materially affect our business. Our future success also depends on our ability to identify, attract and retain additional qualified personnel. Competition for employees in our industry is intense and we may not be successful in attracting or retaining them. There are a limited number of people with knowledge of, and experience in, our industry. We do not have employment agreements with many of our key employees. We do not maintain life insurance polices on many of our employees. Our loss of key personnel, especially without advance notice, or our inability to hire or retain qualified personnel, could have a material adverse effect on sales and our ability to maintain our technological edge. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to retain our key management and skilled personnel, or that we will be able to attract, assimilate and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future.
The voting power in our company is substantially controlled by a small number of stockholders, which may, among other things, delay or frustrate the removal of incumbent directors or a takeover attempt, even if such events may be beneficial to our stockholders.
As of June 29, 2007, Stanford International Bank Ltd.
(SIBL)
, which we refer to as Stanford, and Dr. L.S. Smith, our chairman and chief executive officer, collectively had the power to vote approximately 63% of our voting securities, and beneficially owned approximately 56.4% of our voting securities on a fully-diluted basis (after giving effect to the exercise of all options and warrants held by them which are exercisable within sixty days of
December 31
, 2007 but not giving effect to the exercise of any other options or warrants). Consequently, these two stockholders may have sufficient voting power to control the outcome of virtually all corporate matters submitted to the vote of our common stockholders. Those matters could include the election of directors, changes in the size and composition of our board of directors, mergers and other business combinations involving us, or the liquidation of our company. In addition, Stanford and Dr. Smith have entered into a corporate governance agreement with us, which entitles Stanford and Dr. Smith to each nominate two “independent” directors to our board and entitles Dr. Smith, our chairman and chief executive officer, and William H. Oyster, our president and chief operating officer, to be nominated to our board for so long as he remains an executive officer.
10
Through this control of company nominations to our board of directors and through their voting power, Stanford and Dr. Smith are able to exercise substantial control over certain decisions, including decisions regarding the qualification and appointment of officers, dividend policy, access to capital (including borrowing from third-party lenders and the issuance of additional equity securities), a merger or consolidation with another company, and our acquisition or disposition of assets. Also, the concentration of voting power in the hands of Stanford and Dr. Smith could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company, even if the change in control would benefit our other stockholders. The significant concentration of stock ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock due to investors’ perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.
We could be subject to sales taxes, interest and penalties on interstate sales for which we have not collected taxes.
Superior
has not collected
California
sales tax on mail-order sales to out-of-state customers, nor has it collected use tax on its interstate mail order sales. We believe that our sales to interstate customers are generally tax-exempt due to varying state exemptions relative to the definitions of being engaged in business in particular states and the lack of current Internet taxation. While we have not been contacted by any state authorities seeking to enforce sales or use tax regulations, we cannot assure you that we will not be contacted by authorities in the future with inquiries concerning our compliance with current statutes, nor can we assure you that future statutes will not be enacted that affect the sales and use tax aspects of our business.
We may incur losses as a result of accumulating inventory.
A
substantial portion of the
products
that
we
sell comes from
our
own inventory.
We
purchased these
products
from dealers and collectors and assume the inventory and price risks of these items until they are sold. If
we
are
unable to resell the
products
that
we
purchase when
we
want or need to, or at prices sufficient to generate a profit from their resale, or if the market value of the inventory of purchased
products
were to decline, our revenue would likely decline.
Our planned expansion and enhancement of our website
s
and internet operations may not result in increased profitability.
The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our website and network infrastructure are and will be critical to our reputation and our ability to attract and retain customers and technical personnel and to maintain adequate customer service levels. Any system interruptions or reduced performance of our website could materially adversely affect our reputation and our ability to attract new customers and technical personnel. We are in the process of development and/or enhancement of several portions of our websites that will offer content and auctions for rare coins that may have a lower average selling price than many of the rare coins in the markets we currently serve, and in the future we plan to integrate various of our websites. Continued development of our websites will require significant resources and expense. If the planned expansion of our websites does not result in increased revenue, we may experience decreased profitability.
11
Our website
s
may be vulnerable to security breaches and similar threats which could result in our liability for damages and harm to our reputation.
Despite the implementation of network security measures, our websites are vulnerable to computer viruses, break-ins and similar disruptive problems caused by internet users. These occurrences could result in our liability for damages, and our reputation could suffer. The circumvention of our security measures may result in the misappropriation of customer or other confidential information. Any such security breach could lead to interruptions and delays and the cessation of service to our customers and could result in a decline in revenue and income.
Changes to financial accounting standards and new exchange rules could make it more expensive to issue stock options to employees, which would increase compensation costs and may cause us to change our business practices.
We prepare our financial statements to conform with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, in the
United States
. These accounting principles are subject to interpretation by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC and various other bodies. A change in those policies could have a significant effect on our reported results and may affect our reporting of transactions completed before a change is announced.
We are subject to new corporate governance and internal control reporting requirements, and our costs related to compliance with, or our failure to comply with existing and future requirements could adversely affect our business.
We face new corporate governance requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as new rules and regulations subsequently adopted by the SEC, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the
NYSE Amex
. These laws, rules and regulations continue to evolve and may become increasingly stringent in the future. In particular, we a
re
required to include management
’s
r
eport on internal controls as part of our annual report for the year ending December 31, 2007 pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
We are in the process of evaluating our control structure to help ensure that we will be able to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We cannot assure you that we will be able to fully comply with these laws, rules and regulations that address corporate governance, internal control reporting and similar matters. Failure to comply with these laws, rules and regulations could materially adversely affect our reputation, financial condition and the value and liquidity of our securities.
12
The revolving credit facilities with Stanford International Bank Ltd. and Texas Capital Bank, N.A. is each collateralized by a general security interest in our assets. If we were to default under the terms of either credit facility, the lender would have the right to foreclose on our assets.
In December 2005, we entered into a revolving credit facility with Texas Capital Bank, N.A., which permits borrowings up to a maximum principal amount of $4.3 million. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are collateralized by a general security interest in substantially all of our assets (other than the assets of
Superior
).
As
of
December
31
, 200
8
, approximately $
4
.
0
million was outstanding under the term loan and revolving credit facility. If we were to default under the terms and conditions of the revolving credit facility, Texas Capital Bank would have the right to accelerate any indebtedness outstanding and foreclose on our assets in order to satisfy our indebtedness. Such a foreclosure could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, results of operations and financial position.
In October 2003,
Superior
entered into a revolving credit facility with Stanford Financial Group Company, which we refer to as SFG, which has assigned the facility to Stanford. The facility currently permits borrowings up to a maximum principal amount of $11.5 million, up to $6
.5
million of which
Superior
may upstream to DGSE. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are collateralized by a general security interest in substantially all of
Superior
’s assets and, to the extent of money upstreamed to DGSE, substantially all of DGSE’s assets. As of
December 31, 2008
, approximately $
9.2
million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility. If
Superior
were to default under the terms and conditions of the revolving credit facility, Stanford would have the right to accelerate any indebtedness outstanding and foreclose on
Superior
’s assets, and, subject to intercreditor arrangements with Texas Capital Bank and other limitations, our assets, in order to satisfy
Superior
’s indebtedness. Such a foreclosure could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, results of operations and financial position.
We have been informed that on February 19, 2009, a US district court placed SIBL under the supervision of a receiver and that the court enjoined SIBL's creditors and other persons from taking certain actions related to SIBL or its assets. In addition, on the same date, Antiguan Financial Services Regulatory Commission appointed a Receiver for Stanford International Bank Ltd. This action was subsequently ratified by the High Court of Justice in Antigua and Barbuda. As a result of SIBL's current status, we do not believe that Superior will be able to borrow additional funds under either revolving loan, including any amounts Superior is obligated to repay to SIBL pursuant to the repayment provisions applicable to the first revolving note. We believe that certain terms of agreements entered into by us, Superior and/or SIBL and its affiliates in connection with our acquisition of Superior have been breached by SIBL or its affiliates, and we are evaluating available remedies, including but not limited to damages from responsible parties. While Superior does not currently require additional funds under the SIBL credit facility, should the need arise and Superior is unable to replace this credit facility the operations and performance of Superior could be materially adversely affected.
We have not paid dividends on our common stock in the past and do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
We have not paid common stock dividends since our inception and do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. Our current business plan provides for the reinvestment of earnings in an effort to complete development of our technologies and products, with the goal of increasing sales and long-term profitability and value. In addition, our revolving credit facility with Texas Capital Bank currently restricts, and any other credit or borrowing arrangements that we may enter into may in the future restrict or limit, our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
13
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES.
We own a 20,000 square foot facility at 11311 Reeder Rd, Dallas, Texas which houses retail and wholesale jewelry, bullion and rare coin trading operations and our principal executive offices. The land and buildings are subject to a mortgage maturing in August 2016, with a balance outstanding of approximately $2,332,484 as of December 31, 2008.
Our Euless, TX location is a 2,158 square foot facility which houses retail jewelry, bullion and rare coin trading operations. Our monthly lease payments at December 31, 2008 are $2,608 and the lease is due to expire June 30, 2010.
At December 31, 2008 we were leasing two facilities in Dallas, Texas which house our National Pawn operations. The two pawn locations are 7,388 square feet and 6,800 square feet, respectively. The leases are due to expire on May 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012 and require monthly lease payments in the amount of $9,252 and 5,667, respectively.
CGDE operates in a leased 2,367 square foot facility in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. The lease expires in June 2010 and requires monthly lease payments in the amount of $4,575.
Our Superior Galleries operations are located in an approximately 9,265 square foot storefront facility located at 20011 Ventura Boulevard, Woodland Hills, California. This facility includes administrative, customer support, auction, gallery and retail space. The lease for this facility expires March 31, 2013. The combined monthly rental rate is $30,045 including parking fees and rent of storage space.
We also maintain a resident agent office in Nevada at the office of our Nevada counsel, McDonald, Carano, Wilson, McClure, Bergin, Frankovitch and Hicks, 241 Ridge Street, Reno, Nevada 89505.
ITEM
3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
From time to time, be involved in various claims, lawsuits, disputes with third parties, actions involving allegations of discrimination, or breach of contract actions incidental to the operation of its business. Except as set forth above, we are not currently involved in any such litigation which we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations, liquidity or cash flows.
14
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
On October 31, 2007, our Common Stock began trading on the NYSE Amex under the symbol “DGC”. Previously, our Common Stock was traded on the NASDAQ Small CAP Market under the symbol “DGSE”. The following table sets forth for the period indicated, the per share high and low bid quotations as reported by NASDAQ or actual closing sale prices as reported on NYSE Amex for our common stock. During the past three years, we have not declared any dividends with respect to our common stock. We intend to retain all earnings to finance future growth; accordingly, it is not anticipated that cash dividends will be paid to holders of common stock in the foreseeable future.
The following quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions and may not reflect actual transactions. High and low bid quotations for the last two years were:
2008
High
Low
Fourth Quarter
$
2.600
$
1.000
Third Quarter
3.800
2.420
Second Quarter
5.040
2.920
First Quarter
5.450
4.000
2007
High
Low
Fourth Quarter
$
6.110
$
3.470
Third Quarter
4.490
3.050
Second Quarter
4.100
2.080
First Quarter
3.000
2.380
On March 27, 2009, the closing sales price for our common stock was $0.85 and there were 558 shareholders of record.
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.
We have granted options to certain officers, directors and key employees to purchase shares of our common stock. Each option vests according to a schedule designed by our board of directors, not to exceed four years. Each option expires 180 days from the date of termination of the employee or director. The exercise price of each option is equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant. These option grants have been approved by security holders.
The following table summarizes options outstanding as of December 31, 2008:
Plan Category
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of
options, warrants & rights
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding
options,
warrants & rights
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
1,444,134
$2.34
700,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
None
--
None
Total
1,443,134
$2.34
700,000
15
Stock Performance Table
The following table represents a comparison of the five year total return of our common stock to the NASDAQ Composite Index, the S&P 600 Small Cap Index and the S&P Retail Index for
the period from January 1, 2003
to December 31, 200
8
. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 200
3
and dividends, if any, were reinvested for all years ending December 31.
Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Return
Date:
DGSE
Common Stock
NASDAQ
Composite Index
S&P Retail Index
S&P 600 Small
Cap Index
2003
100
100
100
100
2004
83
111
136
142
2005
59
113
134
142
2006
75
124
146
172
2007
490
197
143
199
2008
42
78
73
73
On June 27, 2006 stockholders of the Company approved the adoption of the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan). During the year ended December 31, 2007, there were 50,000 options granted to our non-employee directors under this plan and, as a result, there are 700,000 shares available for future grants under the 2006 Plan.
16
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as "may," "will," "would," "expect," "intend," "could," "estimate," "should," "anticipate" or "believe." We intend that all forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created by these laws. All statements other than statements of historical information provided herein are forward-looking and may contain information about financial results, economic conditions, trends, and known uncertainties. All forward-looking statements are based on current expectations regarding important risk factors. Many of these risks and uncertainties are beyond our ability to control, and, in many cases, we cannot predict all of the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, and readers should not regard those statements as a representation by us or any other person that the results expressed in the statements will be achieved. Important risk factors that could cause results or events to differ from current expectations are described under the section “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. These factors are not intended to be an all-encompassing list of risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development and results of our business. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to release publicly the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereon, including without limitation, changes in our business strategy or planned capital expenditures, store growth plans, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
Revenues increased by $43,749,984 or 71.2%, in 2008. This increase was primarily the result of a $24,296,000 or 114.9% increase in the sale of precious metals products, a $17,254,000, or 89.2% increase in retail jewelry sales and a $1,992,000, or 14.3% increase in rare coin sales. The increases in precious metals, rare coin and jewelry sales were due to a price increase in gold products and the acquisition of Superior Galleries and Euless Gold and Silver. Consumer loan service fees increased by $242,440 in 2008 due to increased loans outstanding during the year. Cost of goods as a percentage of sales increased to 86.7% in 2008 from 84.1% in 2007 and gross margins decreased to 13.3% in 2008 from 15.9% in 2007. This decrease was due to the significant increase in precious metal sales which have a much lower margin than jewelry and rare coins revenues.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1,520,262 or 18.3% during the year. This increase was due to the start up of Superior Precious metals, Superior Estate Buyers, American Gold and Silver Exchange and the opening of our second pawn shop during 2007. Depreciation and amortization increased by $236,975, or 95.6%, during 2008 due to additional assets being purchased through our recent acquisitions and depreciation on our new facility in Dallas, Texas. The increase in interest expense was due to the additional debt related to the Superior acquisition. The loss from discontinued operations was the result of the discontinuing the operations of our live auction segment and closing of our pay day loan stores.
During 2008, the Company reflected $8,185,443 of goodwill relating to the acquisition of Superior Galleries. Inc. in May 2007. Under SFAS No. 142, the Company is required to undertake an annual impairment test at its year end or when there is a triggering event. In addition to the annual impairment review, there were a number of triggering events in the fourth quarter due to the significant operating losses of Superior and the impact of the economic downturn on Superior’s operations and the decline in the Company’s share price resulting in a substantial discount of the market capitalization to tangible net asset value. An evaluation of the recorded goodwill was undertaken, which considered two methodologies to determine the fair-value of the entity:
·
A market capitalization approach, which measure market capitalization at the measurement date.
·
A discounted cash flow approach, which entails determining fair value using a discounted cash flow methodology. This method requires significant judgment to estimate the future cash flow and to determine the appropriate discount rates, growth rates, and other assumptions.
Each of these methodoligies the Company believes has merit, and resulted in the determination that goodwill was impaired. Accordingly, to reflect the impairment, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $8,185,443, which eliminated the value of the goodwill related to Superior.
Comparison of the Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Revenues increased by $17,612,328, or 40.1%, in 2007. This increase was primarily the result of a $4,901,000, or 30.1% increase in the sale of precious metals products, a $2,819,000, or 17.1% increase in retail jewelry sales, and a $9,224,000, or 196.4% increase in rare coin sales. The increases in precious metals, rare coin and jewelry sales were due to a 31.0% price increase in gold products and the acquisition of Superior Galleries and Euless Gold and Silver. Consumer loan service fees increased by $118,641 in 2007 due to increased loans outstanding during the year. Management fees in the amount of $250,000 were derived from a management agreement between the Company and Superior Galleries prior to the acquisition. Cost of goods as a percentage of sales increased to 84.9% in 2007 from 84.3% in 2006 and gross margins decreased to 15.1% in 2007 from 15.7% in 2006. This decrease was due to the significant increase in precious metal sales which have a much lower margin than jewelry and rare coins revenues.
17
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $2,814,975, or 50.9%. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Superior Galleries and Euless Gold and Silver. These acquisitions accounted for $1,807,000 of the increase. In addition, administrative cost related to the start up of Superior Precious metals, Superior Estate Buyers, American Gold and Silver Exchange and the opening of our second pawn shop totaled $408,000. Depreciation and amortization increased by $110,543, or 99.4%, during 2007 due to additional assets being purchased through our recent acquisitions. The increase in interest expense was due to the additional debt related to the Superior acquisition. The loss from discontinued operations was the result of the closing of our pay day loan stores.
Historically, changes in the market prices of precious metals have had a significant impact on both revenues and cost of sales in the rare coin and precious metals segments in which we operate. It is expected that due to the commodity nature of these products, future price changes for precious metals will continue to be indicative of our performance in these business segments. Changes in sales and cost of sales in the retail and wholesale jewelry segments are primarily influenced by the national economic environment. It is expected that this trend will continue in the future due to the nature of these products.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We expect capital expenditures to total approximately $250,000 during the next twelve months. It is anticipated that these expenditures will be funded from working capital and our bank credit facility. As of December 31, 2008 there were no commitments outstanding for capital expenditures.
In the event of significant growth in retail and or wholesale jewelry sales, the demand for additional working capital will expand due to a related need to stock additional jewelry inventory and increases in wholesale accounts receivable. Historically, vendors have offered us extended payment terms to finance the need for jewelry inventory growth and our management believes that we will continue to do so in the future. Any significant increase in wholesale accounts receivable will be financed under our bank credit facility.
Our ability to finance our operations and working capital needs are dependent upon management’s ability to negotiate extended terms or refinance its debt. We have historically renewed, extended or replaced short-term debt as it matures and management believes that we will be able to continue to do so in the near future.
From time to time, we have adjusted our inventory levels to meet seasonal demand or in order to meet working capital requirements. Management is of the opinion that if additional working capital is required, additional loans can be obtained from individuals or from commercial banks. If necessary, inventory levels may be adjusted or a portion of our investments in marketable securities may be liquidated in order to meet unforeseen working capital requirements.
In December 2005, we entered into a revolving credit facility with Texas Capital Bank, N.A., which currently permits borrowings up to a maximum principal amount of $4.03 million. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are collateralized by a general security interest in substantially all of our assets (other than the assets of
Superior
). As of December 31, 2008, approximately $4.0 million was outstanding under the term loan and revolving credit facility. If we were to default under the terms and conditions of the revolving credit facility, Texas Capital Bank would have the right to accelerate any indebtedness outstanding and foreclose on our assets in order to satisfy our indebtedness. Such a foreclosure could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, results of operations and financial position. This credit facility matures in June 2009.
Upon the consummation of our acquisition of Superior, and after the exchange by Stanford of $8.4 million of Superior debt for shares of Superior common stock, Superior amended and restated its credit facility with Stanford. The amended and restated commercial loan and security agreement, which we refer to as the loan agreement, decreased the available credit line from $19.89 million to $11.5 million, reflecting the $8.4 million debt exchange. Interest on the outstanding principal balance will continue to accrue at the prime rate, as reported in the Wall Street Journal or, during an event of default, at a rate 5% greater than the prime rate as so reported.
18
Loan proceeds can only be used for customer loans inventory purchases and receivables consistent with specified loan policies and procedures and for permitted inter-company transactions. Permitted inter-company transactions are loans or dividends paid to us or our other subsidiaries. We guaranteed the repayment of these permitted inter-company transactions pursuant to a secured subordinated guaranty in favor of Stanford. In connection with the secured guarantee, Stanford and Texas Capital Bank, N.A., our primary lender, entered into an intercreditor agreement with us, and we entered into a subordination agreement with Superior, both of which subordinate Stanford's security interests and repayment rights to those of Texas Capital Bank.
As of December 31, 2008,
approximately $9.2 million was outstanding under this credit facility
and there were no intercompany transactions outstanding.
This credit facility matures on May 1, 2011, provided that in case any of several customary events of default occurs, Stanford may declare the entire principal amount of both loans due immediately and take possession and dispose of the collateral described below. An event of default includes, among others, the following events: failure to make a payment when due under the loan agreement; breach of a covenant in the loan agreement or any related agreement; a representation or warranty made in the loan agreement or related agreements is materially incorrect; a default in repayment of borrowed money to any person; a material breach or default under any material contract; certain bankruptcy or insolvency events; and a default under a third-party loan. Superior is obligated to repay the first revolving loan from the proceeds of the inventory or other collateral purchased with the proceeds of the loan.
The loans are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of Superior’s assets, including inventory, accounts receivable, promissory notes, books and records and insurance policies, and the proceeds of the foregoing. In addition, pursuant to the limited secured guaranty and intercreditor arrangements described above, Stanford would have a second-order security interest in all of our accounts and inventory to the extent of intercompany transactions.
The loan agreement includes a number of customary covenants applicable to Superior, including, among others: punctual payments of principal and interest under the credit facility; prompt payment of taxes, leases and other indebtedness; maintenance of corporate existence, qualifications, licenses, intellectual property rights, property and assets; maintenance of satisfactory insurance; preparation and delivery of financial statements for us and separately for Superior in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, tax returns and other financial information; inspection of offices and collateral; notice of certain events and changes; use of proceeds; notice of governmental orders which may have a material adverse effect, SEC filings and stockholder communications; maintenance of property and collateral; and payment of Stanford expenses.
In addition, Superior has agreed to a number of negative covenants in the loan agreement, including, among others, covenants not to: create or suffer a lien or other encumbrance on any collateral, subject to customary exceptions; incur, guarantee or otherwise become liable for any indebtedness, subject to customary exceptions; acquire indebtedness of another person, subject to customary exceptions and permitted inter-company transactions; issue or acquire any shares of its capital stock; pay dividends other than permitted inter-company transactions or specified quarterly dividends, or directors’ fees; sell or abandon any collateral except in the ordinary course of business or consolidate or merge with another entity; enter into affiliate transactions other than in the ordinary course of business on fair terms or permitted inter-company transactions; create or participate in any partnership or joint venture; engage in a new line of business; pay principal or interest on subordinate debt except as authorized by the credit facility; or make capital expenditures in excess of $100,000 per fiscal year
We have been informed that
on February 19, 2009, a US district court placed SIBL
under the supervision of a receiver and that the court enjoined SIBL's creditors and other persons from taking certain actions related to SIBL or its assets.
In addition, on the same date, Antiguan Financial Services Regulatory Commission appointed a Receiver for Stanford International Bank Ltd. This action was subsequently ratified by the High Court of Justice in Antigua and Barbuda. As a result of SIBL's current status, we do not believe that Superior will be able to
borrow additional funds under either revolving loan, including any amounts Superior is obligated to repay to SIBL pursuant to the repayment provisions applicable to the first revolving note.
We
believe that certain terms of
agreements
entered into by us, Superior and/or SIBL and its affiliates in connection with our acquisition of Superior
have been breached by SIBL or its affiliates, and
we are evaluating available remedies, including but not limited to damages from responsible parties. While Superior does not currently require additional funds under the SIBL credit facility, should the need arise and Superior is unable to replace this credit facility the operations and performance of Superior could be materially adversely affected.
19
On October 17, 2007, we closed on the purchase of our new headquarters location. As a result, we assumed a new loan with a remaining principal balance of $2,323,484 and an interest rate of 6.70%. The loan has required monthly payments of $20,192 with the final payment due on August 1, 2016.
Payments due by period
Contractual Cash Obligations
Total
2009
2010 - 2011
2012 – 2013
Thereafter
Notes payable
$
191,078
$
191,078
$
--
$
--
$
--
Long-term debt and capital leases
15,910,737
4,195,025
9,403,271
469,381
1,843,060
Operating Leases
2,643,812
658,822
1,237,026
747,964
--
Total
$
18,745,627
$
5,044,925
$
10,640,297
$
1,217,345
$
1,843,060
In addition, we estimate that we will pay approximately $950,000 in interest during the next twelve months.
ITEM 7A.
QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Market Risk
The following discussion about our market risk disclosures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and precious metal values. We also are exposed to regulatory risk in relation to our pawn loans. We do not use derivative financial instruments.
Our earnings and financial position may be affected by changes in precious metal values and the resulting impact on pawn lending and jewelry sales. The proceeds of scrap sales and our ability to liquidate excess jewelry inventory at an acceptable margin are dependent upon gold values. The impact on our financial position and results of operations of a hypothetical change in precious metal values cannot be reasonably estimated.
20
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
(a)
Financial Statements (see pages 29 - 50 of this report).
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Disclosure Controls and procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, m
anagement assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework.
Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance generally accepted accounting principles based on such criteria.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all errors or all instances of fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and any design may not succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitation of a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
21
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
For the year ended December 31, 2008, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
PART III
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES. (*)
(*)
The information required by Item 14 is or will be set forth in the definitive proxy statement relating to the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of DGSE Companies, Inc., which is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This definitive proxy statement relates to a meeting of stockholders involving the election of directors and the portions therefrom required to be set forth in this Form 10-K by Item 14 are incorporated herein by reference pursuant to General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.
22
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
Exhibits
Exhibit
Filed
Incorporated
Date Filed
Exhibit
No.
Description
Herein
by Reference
Form
with SEC
No.
2.1
Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of January 6, 2007
×
8-K
January 9, 2007
2.1
2.2
Limited Joinder Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2007
×
8-K
January 9, 2007
2.9
3.1
Articles of Incorporation dated September 17, 1965
×
8-A12G
June 23, 1999
3.1
3.2
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated October 14, 1981
×
8-A12G
June 23, 1999
3.2
3.3
Certificate of Resolution, dated October 14, 1981
×
8-A12G
June 23, 1999
3.3
3.4
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation , dated July 15, 1986
×
8-A12G
June 23, 1999
3.4
3.5
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated August 23, 1998
×
8-A12G
June 23, 1999
3.5
3.6
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated June 26, 1992
×
8-A12G
June 23, 1999
3.6
3.7
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated June 26, 2001
×
8-K
July 3, 2001
1.0
3.8
Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, dated May 22, 2007
×
8-K
May 31, 2007
3.1
3.9
By-laws, dated March 2, 1992
×
8-A12G
June 23, 1999
3.7
4.1
Specimen Common Stock Certificate
×
S-4
January 6, 2007
4.1
23
10.1
Renewal, Extension And Modification Agreement dated January 28, 1994, by and among DGSE Corporation and Michael E. Hall And Marian E. Hall
×
10-KSB
March 1995
10.2
10.2
Lease Agreement dated June 2, 2000 by and between SND Properties and Charleston Gold and Diamond Exchange, Inc.
×
10-KSB
March 29, 2001
10.1
10.3
Lease agreement dated October 5, 2004 by and between Beltline Denton Road Associates and Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange
×
10-K
April 15, 2005
10.2
10.4
Lease agreement dated December 1, 2004 by and between Stone Lewis Properties and Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange
×
10-K
April 15, 2005
10.3
10.5
Lease agreement dated November 18, 2004 by and between Hinkle Income Properties LLC and American Pay Day Centers, Inc.
×
10-K
April 15, 2005
10.4
10.6
Lease Agreement dated January 17, 2005 by and between Belle-Hall Development Phase III Limited Partnership and DGSE Companies, Inc.
×
S-4
January 6, 2007
10.6
10.7
Sale agreement dated executed July 5, 2007 by and between DGSE Companies, Inc. and Texas Department of Transportation
×
8-K
July 11, 2007
10.1
10.8
Purchase agreement dated July 5, 2007 by and between DGSE Companies, Inc. and 11311 Reeder Road Holdings, LP
×
8-K
July 11, 2007
10.2
10.9
Loan Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2005, between DGSE Companies, Inc. and Texas Capital Bank, N.A.
×
8-K/A
August 17, 2006
10.1
24
10.10
Third Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated as of May 10, 2007, by and between DGSE Companies, Inc. and Texas Capital Bank, N.A.
×
8-K
May 9, 2007
3.0
10.11
Support Agreement, DGSE stockholders, dated as of January 6, 2007
×
8-K
January 9, 2007
99.1
10.12
Securities Exchange Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2007
×
8-K
January 9, 2007
99.2
10.13
Warrant to DiGenova, issued January 6, 2007
×
8-K
January 9, 2007
99.3
10.14
Support Agreement, Superior stockholders, dated as of January 6, 2007
×
8-K
January 9, 2007
99.5
10.15
Asset purchase agreement, dated May 9, 2007, by and between DGSE Companies, Inc. and Euless Gold & Silver, Inc.
×
8-K
May 9, 2007
1.0
10.16
Subordinated Promissory Note dated May 9, 2007
×
8-K
May 9, 2007
2.0
10.17
Registration Rights Agreement with Stanford International Bank Ltd., dated as of May 30, 2007
×
8-K
May 31, 2007
99.1
10.18
Corporate Governance Agreement with Dr. L.S. Smith and Stanford International Bank Ltd., dated as of May 30, 2007
×
8-K
May 31, 2007
99.2
10.19
Escrow Agreement with American Stock Transfer & Trust Company and Stanford International Bank Ltd., as stockholder agent, dated as of May 30, 2007
×
8-K
May 31, 2007
99.3
10.20
Form of Warrants
×
8-K
May 31, 2007
99.4
10.21
Amended and Restated Commercial Loan and Security Agreement, by and between Superior Galleries Inc. and Stanford International Bank Ltd., dated as of May 30, 2007
×
8-K
May 31, 2007
99.5
25
10.22
Employment Agreement with L.S. Smith, dated as of May 30, 2007
×
8-K
May 31, 2007
99.6
10.23
Employment Agreement with William H. Oyster, dated as of May 30, 2007
×
8-K
May 31, 2007
99.7
10.24
Employment Agreement with John Benson, dated as of May 30, 2007
×
8-K
May 31, 2007
99.8
31.1
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Dr. L.S. Smith
×
31.2
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 implementing Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by John Benson
×
32.1
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by Dr. L.S. Smith
×
32.2
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by John Benson
×
(b)
Reports on Form 8-K :
None.
26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DGSE Companies, Inc.
By:
/s/ L. S. Smith
Dated: March 31, 2009
L. S. Smith
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and
Secretary
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By:
/s/ L. S. Smith
Dated: March 31, 2009
L.S Smith
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and
Secretary
By:
/s/ W. H. Oyster
Dated: March 31, 2009
W. H. Oyster
Director, President and
Chief Operating Officer
By:
/s/ John Benson
Dated: March 31, 2009
John Benson
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
By:
/s/ William P. Cordeiro
Dated: March 31, 2009
Director
By:
/s/ Craig Allan-Lee
Dated: March 31, 2009
Director
By:
/s/Mitch Stoltz
Dated: March 31, 2009
Director
By:
/s/David Rector
Dated: March 31, 2009
Director
27
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders of DGSE Companies, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of DSGE Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We have not been engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Cornwell Jackson
Plano, Texas
March 31, 2009
28
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
2008
2007
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
244,429
$
536,548
Trade receivables
2,326,337
3,249,229
Inventories
16,052,833
12,975,782
Prepaid expenses
533,318
459,486
Prepaid federal income tax
639,372
59,341
Current assets of discontinued operations
900,306
1,290,245
Total current assets
20,696,595
18,570,631
Marketable securities – available for sale
-
61,769
Property and equipment, net
4,868,306
4,193,869
Deferred income taxes
1,908,032
1,805,205
Goodwill
837,117
8,952,181
Intangible assets
2,492,673
2,521,340
Other assets
235,917
309,836
Non-current assets of discontinued operations
305,275
444,383
$
31,343,915
$
36,859,214
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities:
Notes payable
$
191,078
$
187,467
Current maturities of long-term debt
599,972
501,631
Line of credit
3,595,000
-
Accounts payable – trade
734,906
1,069,194
Accrued expenses
647,536
1,018,003
Customer deposits
1,230,991
315,437
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
33,144
-
Total current liabilities
7,032,627
3,091,732
Long-term debt, less current maturities
11,715,765
13,489,901
18,748,392
16,581,633
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 9,833,635 and 4,490,357 shares issued and outstanding at the end of each period in 2008 and 2007
98,337
94,904
Additional paid-in capital
18,541,662
18,473,234
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
-
(97,288
)
Retained earnings (deficit)
(6,044,476
)
1,806,731
12,595,523
20,277,581
$
31,343,915
$
36,859,214
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
29
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years
ended
December
31,
2008
2007
2006
Revenue
Sales
$
104,670,207
$
60,912,663
$
43,668,973
Consumer loan service charges
548,853
306,413
187,772
Management fees
-
250,000
—
105,219,060
61,469,076
43,856,745
Costs and expenses
Cost of goods sold
91,237,578
51,711,643
36,809,910
Selling, general and administrative expenses
9,841,806
8,321,544
5,529,314
Depreciation and amortization
484,832
247,857
111,259
101,564,216
60,281,044
42,450,483
Operating income
3,654,844
1,188,032
1,406,262
Other (income) expense
Impairment of goodwill
8,185,444
—
—
Other income
87,693
(552,665
)
(16,534
)
Interest expense
902,897
675,199
408,269
Earnings before income taxes
(5,521,190
)
1,065,498
1,014,527
Income tax expense
759,777
250,056
348,188
Net earnings (loss) from continuing operations
(6,280,967
)
815,442
666,339
Discontinued operations:
Loss (Gain) from discontinued operations (less applicable income tax benefit (expense) of $808,911, ($18,556) and $28,381, respectively)
1,570,240
(21,207
)
55,094
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations (less applicable income tax benefit of $0, $26,208 and $0, respectively)
—
81,630
—
Net earnings
$
(7,851,207
)
$
755,019
$
611,245
Earnings per common share
Basic
From continuing operations
$
(.65
)
$
.11
$
.14
From discontinued operations
(.16
)
(.01
)
(.02
)
Net earnings per common share
$
(.81
)
$
.10
$
.12
Diluted
From continuing operations
$
(.65
)
$
.10
$
.13
From discontinued operations
(.16
)
(.01
)
(.01
)
Net earnings per common share
$
(.81
)
$
.09
$
.12
Weighted average number of common shares:
Basic
9,708,045
7,507,579
4,913,290
Diluted
9,708,045
8,281,887
5,006,909
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
30
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
Common Stock
Additional
Paid-in
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Total
Stockholder’s
Shares
Amount
Capital
Deficit)
Income (Loss)
Equity
Balance at January 1, 2006
4,913,290
$
49,133
$
5,708,760
$
440,467
$
(127,252
)
$
6,071,108
Net earnings
611,245
611,245
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax
(4,993
)
(4,993
)
Balance at December 31, 2006
4,913,290
$
49,133
$
5,708,760
$
1,051,712
$
(132,245
)
$
6,677,360
Net earnings
755,019
755,019
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax
34,957
34,957
Acquisition of Superior
3,669,067
36,691
12,593,172
12,629,863
Conversion of warrants
908,000
9,080
142,485
151,565
Stock based compensation
28,817
28,817
Balance at December 31, 2007
9,490,357
$
94,904
$
18,473,234
$
1,806,731
$
(97,288
)
$
20,277,581
Net loss
$
(7,851,207
)
$
(7,851,207
)
Impairment of marketable securities, net of tax
97,288
97,288
Stock option expense
36,092
36,092
Stock issued in Heritage settlement
8,372
83
49,916
49,999
Stock warrants exercised
334,906
3,350
(17,580
)
(14,230
)
Balance at December 31, 2008
9,833,635
$
98,337
$
18,541,662
$
(6,044,476
)
$
—
$
12,595,523
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
31
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2008
2007
2006
Cash flows from operating activities
Net earnings
$
(7,851,207
)
$
755,019
$
611,245
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization
484,832
253,887
139,395
Impairment of Goodwill
8,185,443
—
—
Deferred taxes
(102,827
)
(31,692
)
(3,801
)
(Gain)/Loss on sale of marketable securities
115,991
(3,890
)
—
Stock option expense
36,092
—
—
Loss on discontinued operations
—
120,495
—
Gain on sale of building
—
(579,447
)
—
(Increase) decrease in operating assets and liabilities
Trade receivables
1,473,136
(3,345,559
)
(317,694
)
Inventories
(3,077,051
)
(928,838
)
(225,908
)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
(73,832
)
(70,810
)
23,181
Change in other long term assets
73,919
181,855
(11,826
)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
(668,000
)
(695,689
)
179,081
Change in customer deposits
915,554
24,712
(34,408
)
Federal income taxes payable
(580,031
)
38,131
(111,392
)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(1,067,981
)
(4,281,376
)
247,793
Cash flows from investing activities
Pawn loans made
(1,294,876
)
(714,209
)
(485,595
)
Pawn loans repaid
649,122
380,060
417,124
Recovery of pawn loan principal through sale of forfeited collateral
624,557
204,121
100,960
Pay day loans made
—
(164,289
)
(274,973
)
Pay day loans repaid
—
125,982
195,534
Purchase of property and equipment
(1,130,602
)
(3,780,554
)
(42,058
)
Deal cost for Superior Galleries acquisition
(70,379
)
(375,280
)
(569,782
)
Acquisition of Euless Gold & Silver
—
(600,000
)
—
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations
—
77,496
—
Proceeds from sale of building
—
924,742
—
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
—
396
—
Net cash used in investing activities
(1,222,178
)
(3,921,535
)
(658,790
)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from debt
2,500,000
6,991,578
1,247,350
Mortgage on new corporate office and store location
—
2,441,922
—
Issuance of common stock
78,835
78,363
—
Repayments of notes payable
(580,795
)
(1,982,686
)
(668,905
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
1,989,040
7,529,177
578,445
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(292,119
)
(673,734
)
167,448
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
536,548
1,210,282
1,042,834
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
244,429
$
536,548
$
1,210,282
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
32
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(
Continued
)
Supplemental disclosures:
2008
2007
2006
Cash paid during the year for:
Interest
$
904,242
$
572,592
$
378,562
Income taxes
$
600,000
$
50,000
$
435,000
Non-Cash Financing
Heritage Settlement
$
50,000
$
—
$
—
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
33
DGSE Companies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note 1 – Summary of Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations
A summary of the significant accounting policies applied in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements follows:
Principles of Consolidation and Nature of Operations
DGSE Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”), sell jewelry and bullion products to both retail and wholesale customers throughout the United States through its facilities in Dallas and Euless, Texas, Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, Woodland Hills California and through its internet sites.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
On July 13, 2007, the Company sold the loan balances from our American Pay Day Center locations and discontinued operations in those locations. In November 2008, the Company decided to discontinue the live auction segment of its business activities. This decision was based on the substantial losses being incurred by this operating segment during 2008. As a result, the operating results of the auction segment have been reclassified to discontinued operations for both 2008 and 2007. During 2008 the auction segment incurred a pretax loss of $2,379,151. As a result of these dispositions, the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes have been reclassed to present the results of the American Pay Day Center locations and auction segment activities as discontinued operations.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Investments in Marketable Equity Securities
Marketable equity securities have been categorized as available-for-sale and carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses for available-for-sale securities are included as a component of shareholders’ equity net of tax until realized. Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are based on the specific identification method. The Company continually reviews its investments to determine whether a decline in fair value below the cost basis is other than temporary. If the decline in the fair values is judged to be other than temporary, the cost basis of the security is written down to fair value and the amount of the write-down is included in the consolidated statements of operations.
Inventory
Jewelry and other inventory is valued at lower-of-cost-or-market (specific identification). Bullion inventory is valued at lower-of-cost-or-market (average cost).
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are being provided on the straight-line method over periods of three to thirty years. Machinery and equipment under capital leases are amortized on the straight-line method over the life of the lease. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred.
Goodwill
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
. Under that pronouncement, goodwill is not being amortized but is subject to periodic tests to determine the amount of impairment, if any, to be reflected during the period.
34
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note 1 – Summary of Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations -
continued
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets (including intangible assets) based on their current and anticipated future undiscounted cash flows. An impairment occurs when the discounted cash flows (excluding interest) do not exceed the carrying amount of the asset. The amount of the impairment loss is the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and its estimated fair value.
Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, marketable securities, short-term debt, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these consolidated financial instruments. The carrying amount reported for long-term debt approximates fair value because substantially all of the underlying instruments have variable interest rates which reprice frequently or the interest rates approximate current market rates.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to $2,584,657, $1,442,723 and $823,106 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Accounts Receivable
The Company records trade receivables when revenue is recognized. No product has been consigned to customers. The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts is primarily determined by review of specific trade receivables. Those accounts that are doubtful of collection are included in the allowance. These provisions are reviewed to determine the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Trade receivables
are charged off when there is certainty as to their being uncollectible. Trade receivables are considered delinquent when payment has not been made within contract terms. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had a recorded allowance amount of $97,922. The balance of the Company’s trade receivables is net of the allowance amount.
Pawn loans receivable in the amount of $306,620 and $263,856 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets caption trade receivables. The related pawn service charges receivable in the amount of $89,235 and $63,532 as of December 31 2008 and 2007, respectively, are also included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets caption trade receivables.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the consolidated financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is generated from wholesale and retail sales of rare coins, precious metals, bullion and second-hand jewelry. The recognition of revenue varies for wholesale and retail transactions and is, in large part, dependent on the type of payment arrangements made between the parties. The Company recognizes sales on an F.O.B. shipping point basis.
The Company sells rare coins to other wholesalers/dealers within its industry on credit, generally for terms of 14 to 60 days, but in no event greater than one year. The Company grants credit to new dealers based on extensive credit evaluations and for existing dealers based on established business relationships and payment histories. The Company generally does not obtain collateral with which to secure its accounts receivable when the sale is made to a dealer. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit losses based on an evaluation of specific receivables and its historical experience related to credit losses.
Revenues for monetary transactions (i.e., cash and receivables) with dealers are recognized when the merchandise is shipped to the related dealer.
35
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
The Company also sells rare coins to retail customers on credit, generally for terms of 30 to 60 days, but in no event greater than one year. The Company grants credit to new retail customers based on extensive credit evaluations and for existing retail customers based on established business relationships and payment histories. When a retail customer is granted credit, the Company generally collects a payment of 25% of the sales price, establishes a payment schedule for the remaining balance and holds the merchandise as collateral as security against the customer’s receivable until all amounts due under the credit arrangement are paid in full. If the customer defaults in the payment of any amount when due, the Company may declare the customer’s obligation in default, liquidate the collateral in a commercially reasonable manner using such proceeds to extinguish the remaining balance and disburse any amount in excess of the remaining balance to the customer.
Under this retail arrangement, revenues are recognized when the customer agrees to the terms of the credit and makes the initial payment. We have a limited-in-duration money back guaranty policy (as discussed below).
In limited circumstances, the Company exchanges merchandise for similar merchandise and/or monetary consideration with both dealers and retail customers, for which the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SFAS 153, “
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29
.” When the Company exchanges merchandise for similar merchandise and there is no monetary component to the exchange, the Company does not recognize any revenue. Instead, the basis of the merchandise relinquished becomes the basis of the merchandise received, less any indicated impairment of value of the merchandise relinquished. When the Company exchanges merchandise for similar merchandise and there is a monetary component to the exchange, the Company recognizes revenue to the extent of monetary assets received and determine the cost of sale based on the ratio of monetary assets received to monetary and non-monetary assets received multiplied by the cost of the assets surrendered.
The Company has a return policy (money-back guarantee). The policy covers retail transactions involving graded rare coins only. Customers may return graded rare coins purchased within 7 days of the receipt of the rare coins for a full refund as long as the rare coins are returned in exactly the same condition as they were delivered. In the case of rare coin sales on account, customers may cancel the sale within 7 days of making a commitment to purchase the rare coins. The receipt of a deposit and a signed purchase order evidences the commitment. Any customer may return a coin if they can demonstrate that the coin is not authentic, or there was an error in the description of a graded coin.
Revenues from the sale of consigned goods are recognized as commission income on such sale if the Company is acting as an agent for the consignor. If in the process of selling consigned goods, the Company makes an irrevocable payment to a consignor for the full amount due on the consignment and the corresponding receivable from the buyer(s) has not been collected by the Company at that payment date, the Company records that payment as a purchase and the sale of the consigned good(s) to the buyer as revenue as the Company has assumed all collection risk.
Pawn loans (“loans”) are made with the collateral of tangible personal property for one month with an automatic 60-day extension period. Pawn service charges are recorded at the time of redemption at the greater of $15 or the actual interest accrued to date. If the loan is not repaid, the principal amount loaned plus accrued interest (or the fair value of the collateral, if lower) becomes the carrying value of the forfeited collateral (“inventories”) which is recovered through sales to customers.
Direct cost of Pawn Loan Service Charge Revenue
The direct cost of pawn loan service charge revenue is included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations caption “Selling, general and administrative expenses”.
Fair Value Measures
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measures” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances disclosures about fair value measures required under other accounting pronouncements, but does not change existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS 157.
SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity's own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The adoption did not have any financial impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.
36
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note 1 – Summary of Accounting Policies and Nature of Operations -
continued
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and handling costs are included in selling general and administrative expenses, and amounted to $305,988, $266,867 and $178,999 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively
.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings per common share is based upon the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is based upon the weighted average number of common stock outstanding and, when dilutive, common shares issuable for stock options.
Comprehensive Income
The Company reports all changes in comprehensive income in the consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity, in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130,
Reporting Comprehensive Income
.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation to employees using the intrinsic value method. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options to employees is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock.
The fair value of these options was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants after 1998, expected volatility of 70% to 96%, risk-free rate of 3.9 to 6.6%, no dividend yield and expected life of 5 to 8 years.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues, and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications were made to the prior years’ consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.
37
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). Among other changes, SFAS 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction at fair value; and establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including earn-out provisions. SFAS 141R is effective for business combinations occurring in the first annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is evaluating the anticipated effect of this recently issued standard on our consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP No. 142-3”), which amends the factors that should be considered when developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of an intangible asset under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (“SFAS No. 142”), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, in order to improve consistency between SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows to measure the fair value of the asset under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” and other U.S. generally accepted accounting practices. This FASB Staff Position is effective for fiscal periods beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of FSP No. 142-3 is not expected to have a material impact the Company’s results of operations and financial position.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). This statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in accordance with GAAP. With the issuance of this statement, the FASB concluded that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed toward the entity and not its auditor, and reside in the accounting literature established by the FASB as opposed to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement on Auditing Standards No. 69, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company has evaluated the new statement and has determined that it will not have a significant impact on the determination or reporting of its financial results.
38
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note 2 – Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company maintains cash balances in financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits.
Note 3 – Inventories
A summary of inventories at December 31 is as follows:
2008
2007
Jewelry
$
10,925,247
$
8,118,454
Scrap gold
636,843
414,099
Bullion
1,931,925
486,991
Rare coins
1,827,294
3,482,248
Other
731,524
473,990
Total
$
16,052,833
$
12,975,782
Note 4 – Investments in Marketable Equity Securities
Marketable equity securities have been classified in the consolidated balance sheet according to management’s intent. The carrying amount of available-for-sale securities and their fair values at December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
Cost
Gross Unrealized Losses
Fair
Value
Classified as
operating losses due
to long-term
impairment
Classified as
unrealized losses in
other comprehensive
income
Equity securities 2008
$
1,406,731
$
(1,406,731
)
$
—
$
—
Equity securities 2007
$
1,408,441
$
(1,249,474
)
$
(97,288
)
$
61,769
At December 31, 2008, management believes the equity shares owned in these publicly traded stocks have declined on an other than temporary basis as these stocks are thinly traded and have market values of less than $ .01 per share. As a result, these investments were written-off in the amount of $115,992.
Note 5 – Property and Equipment
A summary of property and equipment at December 31, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
2008
2007
Buildings and improvements
$
3,175,242
$
2,565,533
Machinery and equipment
1,224,457
812,833
Furniture and fixtures
939,168
806,108
5,338,867
4,184,474
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
1,631,031
1,151,075
3,707,836
3,033,399
Land
1,160,470
1,160,470
Total Property and Equipment
$
4,868,306
$
4,193,869
During 2007, we sold the land and building at which our Dallas retail store and corporate headquarters were previously located, which resulted in a net book value disposition of $712,518. Additionally, the acquisition of Superior Galleries and the purchase of our new land and buildings for our Dallas retail store and corporate headquarters during the fourth quarter of 2007 resulted in a net addition of $3,691,579 to property and equipment.
39
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note 6 – Acquisitions
Superior Galleries, Inc.
On May 30, 2007, we completed our acquisition of Superior Galleries, Inc., which we refer to as Superior, pursuant to an amended and restated agreement and plan of merger and reorganization dated as of January 6, 2007, which we refer to as the merger agreement, with Superior and Stanford International Bank Ltd., then Superior’s largest stockholder and its principal lender, which we refer to as Stanford, as stockholder agent for the Superior stockholders, whereby Superior became a wholly owned subsidiary of DGSE Companies, Inc. Superior’s principal line of business is the sale of rare coins on a retail, wholesale, and auction basis. Superior now operates a store in Woodland Hills, CA. The total purchase price of approximately $13.6 million was broken down as follows:
Shares
Stock Price
Extended Price
Common stock
3,669,067
$
2.55
$
9,356,121
A warrants
845,634
1.27
(1)
1,073,955
B warrants
863,000
2.55
2,220,650
Exercise Price B warrants
863,000
$
.001
(863
)
Direct transaction costs
1,176,290
Total purchase price
$
13,806,153
(1)
The $1.27 is the fair value of the warrants calculated under the Black Sholes method as of the acquisition date.
The total purchase price has been allocated to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:
Goodwill
$
8,203,448
Intangible assets
2,521,340
Deferred tax asset
1,860,475
(1)
Property and other assets
1,068,958
Inventory
3,260,766
Liabilities assumed
(3,108,834
)
Total purchase price
$
13,806,153
(1)
Subsequent to date of acquisition the Company recorded an adjustment to reduce goodwill and increase deferred tax assets to reflect the change in estimated fair value of the net operating loss carryforwards acquired in the Superior acquisition.
In accordance with SFAS 142, the goodwill will not be amortized but instead tested for impairment in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 142 at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of certain events.
During 2008, the Company reflected $8,185,443 of goodwill relating to the acquisition of Superior Galleries. Inc. in May 2007. Under SFAS No. 142, the Company is required to undertake an annual impairment test at its year end or when there is a triggering event. In addition to the annual impairment review, there were a number of triggering events in the fourth quarter due to the significant operating losses of Superior and the impact of the economic downturn on Superior’s operations and the decline in the Company’s share price resulting in a substantial discount of the market capitalization to tangible net asset value. An evaluation of the recorded goodwill was undertaken and it was determined that it was impaired. Accordingly, to reflect the impairment, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $8,185,443, which eliminated the value of the goodwill related to Superior.
The operating results of Superior have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date of May 30, 2007. The following unaudited condensed consolidated financial information reflects the pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 as if the acquisition of Superior had occurred on January 1 of 2007 after giving effect to purchase accounting adjustments as compared to actual results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the effects of the discontinued operations related to the auction segment.
40
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of what operating results would have been had the acquisition actually taken place at the beginning of the period, and may not be indicative of future operating results (in thousands, except per share data):
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)
2008
2007
(Unaudited)
Pro Forma
Total revenue
$
105,219
$
73,565
Net earnings (loss)
$
(7,851
)
$
(2,922
)
Net earnings per share — basic
$
(.81
)
$
(.33
)
Net earnings per share — diluted
$
(.81
)
$
(.33
)
Weighted average shares — basic
9,708
8,582
Weighted average shares — diluted
9,708
10,353
In relation to the acquisition, as of June 29, 2007, Stanford and Dr. L.S. Smith, our chairman and chief executive officer, collectively had the power to vote approximately 63% of our voting securities, and beneficially owned approximately 56.4% of our voting securities on a fully-diluted basis (after giving effect to the exercise of all options and warrants held by them which are exercisable within sixty days of June 29, 2007 but not giving effect to the exercise of any other options or warrants). Consequently, these two stockholders may have sufficient voting power to control the outcome of virtually all corporate matters submitted to the vote of our common stockholders. Those matters could include the election of directors, changes in the size and composition of our board of directors, mergers and other business combinations involving us, or the liquidation of our company. In addition, Stanford and Dr. Smith have entered into a corporate governance agreement with us, which entitles Stanford and Dr. Smith to each nominate two “independent” directors to our board and entitles Dr. Smith, our chairman and chief executive officer, and William H. Oyster, our president and chief operating officer, to be nominated to our board for so long as each remains an executive officer.
Through this control of company nominations to our board of directors and through their voting power, Stanford and Dr. Smith are able to exercise substantial control over certain decisions, including decisions regarding the qualification and appointment of officers, dividend policy, access to capital (including borrowing from third-party lenders and the issuance of additional equity securities), a merger or consolidation with another company, and our acquisition or disposition of assets. Also, the concentration of voting power in the hands of Stanford and Dr. Smith could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company, even if the change in control would benefit our other stockholders. The significant concentration of stock ownership may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock due to investors’ perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.
Euless Gold & Silver, Inc.
On May 9, 2007 we purchased all of the tangible assets of Euless Gold and Silver, Inc., located in Euless, Texas. The purchase price paid for these assets totaled $1,000,000 including $600,000 in cash and a two year note in the amount of $400,000. We opened a new retail store in the former Euless Gold & Silver facility and operate under the name of Dallas Gold & Silver Exchange. Of the assets received, $990,150 was inventory and the remainder was fixed assets.
We entered into these transactions seeing them as opportunistic acquisitions that would allow us to expand our operations and provide a platform for future growth.
41
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note 7 – Goodwill
The Company recognized an increase in goodwill as a result of the Superior Galleries, Inc. acquisition during 2007. At December 31, goodwill was reflected for the following reporting units:
2008
2007
Superior Galleries, Inc.
$
—
$
8,115,064
Wholesale watch sales
$
837,117
$
837,117
Total Goodwill
$
837,117
$
8,952,181
During 2008, the Company reflected $8,185,443 of goodwill relating to the acquisition of Superior Galleries. Inc. in May 2007. Under SFAS No. 142, the Company is required to undertake an annual impairment test at its year end or when there is a triggering event. In addition to the annual impairment review, there were a number of triggering events in the fourth quarter due to the significant operating losses of Superior and the impact of the economic downturn on Superior’s operations and the decline in the Company’s share price resulting in a substantial discount of the market capitalization to tangible net asset value. An evaluation of the recorded goodwill was undertaken, which considered two methodologies to determine the fair-value of the entity:
·
A market capitalization approach, which measure market capitalization at the measurement date.
·
A discounted cash flow approach, which entails determining fair value using a discounted cash flow methodology. This method requires significant judgment to estimate the future cash flow and to determine the appropriate discount rates, growth rates, and other assumptions.
Each of these methodoligies the Company believes has merit, and resulted in the determination that goodwill was impaired. Accordingly, to reflect the impairment, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $8,185,443, which eliminated the value of the goodwill related to Superior.
No impairment losses were recognized during 2007 or 2006.
Note 8 – Notes Payable
At December 31, 2008, the Company was obligated to various individuals under unsecured, demand notes bearing annual interest rates of 8% to 12% totaling $191,078.
At December 31, 2007, the Company was obligated to various individuals under unsecured, demand notes bearing annual interest rates of 8% to 12% totaling $187,468.
At December 31, 2006, the Company was obligated to various individuals under unsecured, demand notes bearing annual interest rates of 8% to 12% totaling $183,708.
42
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note 9 – Long-Term Debt
2008
2007
A summary of long-term debt at December 31, follows:
Revolving promissory notes payable to bank, a note of $3,595,000 at December 31, 2008 and 2007 which bears interest at prime plus 1-1/2% (4.25% and 9.5% at December 31, 2008 and 2007), respectively, and is due June 22, 2009 and a note of $1,000,000 which bears interest at prime plus 1-1/2% ( 4.25 and 9.5% at December 31, 2008 and 2007), respectively, is due in equal monthly installments of $16,667 through June 2009. Balance of note was $399,976 and $584,721 as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The defined borrowing base requirement is based on eligible trade receivables and inventory. As of December 31, 2008, available but unused borrowing capacity on the revolver was $0. These notes are secured by all accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment and intangible assets. The notes contain certain covenants, restricting payment of dividends, and requiring the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. In addition to the above, the Company has an additional $11,500,000 line of credit with Stanford International Bank, LTD. Interest on this facility is at the prime rate, as reported in the Wall Street Journal and the facility will mature and become due in May 2011. Of this line, $9,200,000 has been drawn against, most of which related to the Superior Galleries acquisition. As of December 31, 2008, $2,300,000 was available to us.
$
13,194,976
$
10,879,721
Our mortgage payable as of December 31, 2008 is due in monthly installments of $22,744, including interest of 6.70% with a balance due in August 2016.
2,332,484
2,435,364
Note payable, due in quarterly payments of $57,691 including interest of 8.25%. The final payment is due May 1, 2009
110,791
315,128
Note payable, due January 2, 2009. Interest is payable monthly at a rate of 8%
247,556
310,556
Capital lease obligations
24,930
50,763
15,910,737
13,991,532
Line of credit
(3,595,000
)
Less current maturities
(599,972
)
(501,631
)
$
11,715,765
$
13,489,901
The following table summarizes the aggregate maturities of long-term debt and payments on the capital lease obligations and reflects the revised maturities from refinancing of certain long-term debt subsequent to year-end:
December 31,
Long-term Debt
Obligations under
Capital Leases
Totals
2009
$
4,173,977
$
21,048
$
4,195,025
2010
99,109
3,882
102,991
2011
9,300,280
—
9,300,280
2012
107,209
—
107,209
2013
362,172
—
362,172
Thereafter
1,843,060
—
1,843,060
15,885,807
24,930
15,910,737
Less current portion
(578,924
)
(21,048
)
(599,972
)
Less line of credit
(3,595,000
)
—
(3,595,000
)
$
11,711,883
$
3,882
$
11,715,765
43
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note 10 – Earnings Per Common Share
A reconciliation of the income and shares of the basic earnings per common share and diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
Net Earnings
Shares
Per Share
(In thousands, except per share data)
Year ended December 31, 2008
Basic earnings per common share
$
(7,851,207
)
9,708,045
$
(0.81
)
Effect of dilutive stock options
—
—
Diluted earnings per common share
$
(7,851,207
)
9,708,045
$
(0.81
)
Year ended December 31, 2007
Basic earnings per common share
$
755,019
7,507,579
$
0.10
Effect of dilutive stock options
—
774,308
Diluted earnings per common share
$
755,019
8,281,887
$
0.09
Year ended December 31, 2006
Basic earnings per common share
$
611,245
4,913,920
$
0.12
Effect of dilutive stock options
—
92,989
Diluted earnings per common share
$
611,245
5,006,909
$
0.12
Note 11 – Stock Options
The Company has granted stock options to key employees and directors to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. Each option issued vests according to schedules designated by the Board of Directors, not to exceed three years. The exercise price is based upon the estimated fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant, and is payable when the option is exercised.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) NO.25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,
and related interpretations to account for its employee and director stock options, as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provision of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payments,
(SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based payment awards to employees and directors including employee stock options. In addition, the Company has applied the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB No. 107), issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, in our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R).
The Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified-prospective-transition method. Under this transition method, stock-based compensation expense recognized after the effective date includes: (1) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimate in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and (2) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimate in accordance with the provision of SFAS No. 123. Results from prior periods have not been restated and do not include the impact of SFAS No. 123(R). Stock-based compensation expense under SFAS No. 123(R) for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $0, relating to employee and director stock options and our employee stock purchase plan. Stock-based compensation expense under the provision of APB No. 25 for the year ended December 31, 2006 was insignificant.
44
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Stock-based compensation expense recognized each period is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period. SFAS No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. In our pro forma disclosures required under SFAS No. 123 for periods prior to 2006, the Company accounted for forfeitures as they occurred.
Upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company elected to use the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing formula to value share-based payments granted to employees subsequent to January 1, 2006 and elected to attribute the value of stock-based compensation to expense using the straight-line single option method. These methods were previously used for the Company’s pro forma information required under SFAS No. 123.
On November 10, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-3, “Transition Election Related to Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards”, which detailed an alternative transition method for calculating the tax effects of stock-based compensation pursuant to SFAS No. 123(R). This alternative transition method included simplified methods to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool (APIC pool) related to the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation and to determine the subsequent impact on the APIC pool and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows of the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation awards that are outstanding upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). As of December 31, 2008, we have not recorded the tax effects of employee stock-based compensation and have made no adjustments to the APIC pool.
SFAS No. 123(R) requires the cash flows resulting from the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows. As there have been no stock options exercised, we have not reported these excess tax benefits as of December 31, 2008.
The following table summarizes the activity in common shares subject to options for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
At December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Shares
Weighted
average
exercise
price
Shares
Weighted
average
exercise
price
Shares
Weighted
average
exercise
price
Outstanding at beginning of year
1,479,252
$
2.13
1,403,134
$
2.03
1,403,134
$
2.03
Granted
—
6.00
126,468
9.22
—
0.00
Exercised
—
0.00
—
0.00
—
0.00
Forfeited
(21,097
)
0.00
(50,350
)
14.36
—
0.00
Outstanding at end of year
1,458,155
$
2.17
1,479,252
$
2.35
1,403,134
$
2.03
Options exercisable at end of year
1,418,155
$
2.16
1,417,645
$
2.13
1,403,134
$
2.03
During the year ended December 31, 2007, there have been 50,000 options granted to our non-employee directors under this plan and, as a result, there are 700,000 shares available for future grants under the 2006 Plan.
45
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Information about Plan stock options outstanding at December 31, 2008 is summarized as follows:
Options outstanding
Weighted average
Number
remaining
Weighted average
Range of exercise prices
outstanding
contractual life
exercise price
$1.12
267,857
4 years
$
1.12
$1.13 to $2.25
1,072,777
4 years
$
2.21
$2.26 to $2.82
35,000
4 years
$
2.60
$2.83 to $4.19
17,500
1 years
$
3.88
$6.00
50,000
9 years
$
6.00
$13.91 to $15.56
15,021
3 years
$
14.06
14,458,155
Options exercisable
Number
Weighted average
Range of exercise prices
exercisable
exercise price
$1.12
267,857
$
1.12
$1.13 to $2.25
1,072,777
$
2.21
$2.26 to $2.82
35,000
$
2.60
$2.83 to $4.19
17,500
$
3.88
$6.00
10,000
$
6.00
$13.91 to $15.56
15,021
$
14.06
1,418,155
Note 12 – Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
Before-Tax
Net-of-Tax
Amount
Tax Benefit
Amount
Accumulated comprehensive income (loss) at
January 1, 2006
$
(162,071
)
$
34,819
$
(127,252
)
Unrealized holding losses arising during 2006
(7,519
)
2,572
(4,993
)
Accumulated comprehensive income (loss) at
December 31, 2006
(169,590
)
37,391
(132,245
)
Unrealized holding losses arising during 2007
25,714
9,197
34,957
Accumulated comprehensive income (loss) at
December 31, 2007
(143,876
)
46,588
(97,288
)
Unrealized holding gains arising during 2008
(59,906
)
19,294
(40,508
)
Accumulated comprehensive income (loss)
prior to being written off
(203,782
)
65,882
(137,796
)
Write-off of securities
203,782
(65,882
)
137,796
Accumulated comprehensive income (loss) at December 31, 2008
$
—
$
—
$
—
46
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note 13 – Intangible Assets
Intangible assets represent the customer base and trade name resulting from the Superior Acquisition as follows:
December 31, 2008
December 31, 2007
Customer base
$
401,333
$
430,000
Trade name
$
2,091,340
$
2,091,340
Intangible assets
$
2,492,673
$
2,521,340
Only the customer base intangible asset will be subject to amortization and will be amortized over a 15 year life. The accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2008 is $28,667.
Note 14 – Income Taxes
The income tax provision reconciled to the tax computed at the statutory Federal rate follows:
2008
2007
2006
Tax expense at statutory rate
$
(2,801,643
)
$
272,658
$
316,484
Goodwill impairment
2,783,051
—
—
Other
(30,542
)
(30,254
)
3,323
Tax expense
(49,134
)
242,404
319,807
Current
53,694
77,424
323,653
Deferred
(102,828
)
164,980
(3,846
)
Total
$
(49,134
)
$
242,404
$
319,807
Deferred income taxes are comprised of the following at December 31, 2008 and 2007:
2008
2007
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Inventory
$
123,655
$
90,546
Allowance for bad debt
33,293
—
Unrealized loss on available for sale securities
(4,969
)
46,588
Property and equipment
(8,389
)
(12,764
)
Capital loss carryover
8,366
8,366
Superior acquisition
1,849,968
1,766,361
Goodwill
(93,892
)
(93,892
)
Total deferred tax assets
$
1,908,032
$
1,805,205
Note 15 – Operating Leases
The Company leases certain of its facilities under operating leases. The minimum rental commitments under noncancellable operating leases as of December 31, 2008 are as follows:
Year Ending
Lease
December 31
,
Obligations
2009
$
681,054
2010
645,192
2011
611,827
2012
606,804
Thereafter
148,656
$
2,693,533
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $595,770, $437,069 and $201,810 respectively.
47
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note 16 – Discontinued Operations
In November 2008 we decided to discontinue the live auction segment of the Company’s business activities. This decision was based on the substantial losses being incurred by this operating segment during 2008. As a result, the operating results of the auction segment have been reclassified to discontinued operations for both 2008 and 2007. During 2008 the auction segment incurred a pretax loss of $2,379,151.
The following summarizes the carrying amount of assets and liabilities of the auction segment as of December 31, 2008:
Assets
Accounts receivable
$
900,306
Current assets
$
900,306
Long-term receivable
$
305,275
Total assets
$
1,205,581
Liabilities
Auctions payable
$
33,144
Total liabilities
$
33,144
On July 13, 2007, we sold the loan balances from our American Pay Day Center locations for $77,496 and discontinued operations in those locations. The receivables sold, including interest due, had a balance of $120,573 at the time of the sale. The sales price was determined based on the age of the outstanding receivables. As a result of the sale and discontinued operations, we recognized a pretax loss of $107,838 on the disposal and a pretax loss on discontinued operations of $51,938 for the year ended December 31, 2007.
As a result, operating results from these business segments have been reclassified to discontinued operations for all periods presented. As of December 31, 2008 there were no operating assets to be disposed of or liabilities to be paid in completing the disposition of these operations.
Note 17 – Segment Information
Management identifies reportable segments by product or service offered. Each segment is managed separately. Corporate and other includes certain general and administrative expenses not allocated to segments, pay day lending and pawn operations. The Company’s operations by segment were as follows:
48
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(In thousands)
Retail
Jewelry
Wholesale
Jewelry
Bullion
Rare
Coins
Discontinued
Operations
Corporate
and Other
Consolidated
Revenues
2008
$
36,592
$
5,125
$
45,449
$
15,913
$
—
$
2,140
$
105,219
2007
19,338
5,785
21,153
13,921
—
1,271
61,469
2006
16,519
5,997
16,252
4,697
—
618
44,083
Net income (loss)
2008
1,698
71
139
179
(1,570
)
(8,368
)
(7,851
)
2007
319
197
235
8
42
(46
)
755
2006
143
270
148
101
—
(51
)
485
Identifiable assets
2008
23,396
1,710
1,955
1,827
1,206
1,250
31,344
2007
16,132
2,164
536
4,314
2,139
11,574
36,859
2006
10,020
1,940
114
235
—
837
11,830
Capital Expenditures
2008
1,081
—
6
—
—
10
1,097
2007
3,126
—
23
—
—
274
3,423
2006
11
—
—
—
—
31
285
Depreciation and amortization
2008
140
—
104
104
48
89
485
2007
130
—
33
32
32
27
254
2006
107
—
—
—
—
32
142
49
DGSE COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements -
continued
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Note 18 – Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
1st Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter
4th Quarter
(In thousands, except per share data)
Year ended December 31, 2008
Revenues
$
32,175
$
25,715
$
23,994
$
23,335
Operating profit
1,051
557
1,085
962
Net earnings
182
278
166
(8,477
)
Basic earnings per common share
$
0.04
$
0.05
$
0.02
$
(0.86
)
Diluted earnings per common share
$
0.04
$
0.04
$
0.02
$
(0.86
)
Year ended December 31, 2007
Revenues
$
10,240
$
12,220
$
16,154
$
22,993
Operating profit
384
263
(5
)
534
Net earnings
182
271
108
84
Basic earnings per common share
$
0.04
$
0.05
$
0.02
$
0.02
Diluted earnings per common share
$
0.04
$
0.05
$
0.02
$
0.02
Year ended December 31, 2006
Revenues
$
9,721
$
12,546
$
9,609
$
12,207
Operating profit
302
484
242
295
Net earnings
148
271
108
84
Basic earnings per common share
$
0.03
$
0.05
$
0.02
$
0.02
Diluted earnings per common share
$
0.03
$
0.05
$
0.02
$
0.02
50