Devon Energy - 10-K annual report

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 ofRegulation S-K(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of thisForm 10-Kor any amendment to thisForm 10-K.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2009, was approximately $24.0 billion, based upon the closing price of $54.50 per share as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date. On February 15, 2010, 446.8 million shares of common stock were outstanding.

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Bbl” or “Bbls” means barrel or barrels.

 

“Bcf” means billion cubic feet.

 

“Bcfe” means billion cubic feet of gas equivalent, determined by using the ratio of one Bbl of oil or NGLs to six Mcf of gas.

 

“Boe” means barrel of oil equivalent, determined by using the ratio of one Bbl of oil or NGLs to six Mcf of gas.

 

“Btu” means British thermal units, a measure of heating value.

 

“Canada” means the operations of Devon encompassing oil and gas properties located in Canada.

 

“Federal Funds Rate” means the interest rate at which depository institutions lend balances at the Federal Reserve to other depository institutions overnight.

 

“FPSO” means floating, production, storage and offloading facilities.

 

“Inside FERC” refers to the publication Inside F.E.R.C.’s Gas Market Report.

 

“International” means the discontinued operations of Devon that encompass oil and gas properties that lie outside the United States and Canada.

 

“LIBOR” means London Interbank Offered Rate.

 

“MBbls” means thousand barrels.

 

“MBoe” means thousand Boe.

 

“Mcf” means thousand cubic feet.

 

“MMBbls” means million barrels.

 

“MMBoe” means million Boe.

 

“MMBtu” means million Btu.

 

“MMcf” means million cubic feet.

 

“MMcfe” means million cubic feet of gas equivalent, determined by using the ratio of one Bbl of oil or NGLs to six Mcf of gas.

 

“NGL” or “NGLs” means natural gas liquids.

 

“North American Onshore” means our operations encompassing oil and gas properties in the continental United States and Canada.

 

“NYMEX” means New York Mercantile Exchange.

 

“Oil” includes crude oil and condensate.

 

“SEC” means United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

“U.S. Offshore” means the operations of Devon encompassing oil and gas properties in the Gulf of Mexico.

 

“U.S. Onshore” means the operations of Devon encompassing oil and gas properties in the continental United States.

 

This report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All

statements other than statements of historical facts included or incorporated by reference in this report, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected revenues, projected costs and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are based on our examination of historical operating trends, the information used to prepare the December 31, 2009 reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” or “continue” or similar terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to, our assumptions about:

 

 

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Devon, or persons acting on its behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements. We assume no duty to update or revise our forward-looking statements based on changes in internal estimates or expectations or otherwise.

 

 

 

Devon Energy Corporation, including its subsidiaries (“Devon”), is an independent energy company engaged primarily in exploration, development and production of natural gas and oil. Our oil and gas operations are concentrated in various North American onshore areas in the United States and Canada. We also have offshore operations that are situated principally in the Gulf of Mexico and regions located offshore Azerbaijan, Brazil and China.

 

To complement our upstream oil and gas operations, we have marketing and midstream operations primarily in North America. With these operations, we market gas, crude oil and NGLs. We also construct and operate pipelines, storage and treating facilities and natural gas processing plants. These midstream facilities are used to transport oil, gas, and NGLs and process natural gas.

 

We began operations in 1971 as a privately held company. We have been publicly held since 1988, and our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Our principal and administrative offices are located at 20 North Broadway, Oklahoma City, OK73102-8260(telephone 405/235-3611).

 

 

As an enterprise, we aspire to be the premier independent natural gas and oil company in North America. To achieve this, we continuously strive to optimize value for our shareholders by growing reserves, production, earnings and cash flows, all on a per share basis. We do this by:

 

 

Over the past decade, we captured an abundance of resources by carrying out this strategy. We pioneered horizontal drilling in the Barnett Shale and extended this technique to other natural gas shale plays in the United States and Canada. We became proficient with steam-assisted gravity drainage with our Jackfish oil sands development in Alberta, Canada. We achieved key oil discoveries with our drilling in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico and offshore Brazil. We have more than tripled our proved oil and gas reserves since 2000, and have also assembled an extensive inventory of exploration assets representing additional unproved resources.

 

Building off our past successes, in November 2009, we announced plans to strategically reposition Devon as a high-growth, North American onshore exploration and production company. As part of this strategic repositioning, we plan to bring forward the value of our offshore assets located in the Gulf of Mexico and countries outside North America by divesting them.

 

This repositioning is driven by our desire to unlock and accelerate the realization of the value underlying the deep inventory of opportunities we have. We have assembled a valuable portfolio of offshore assets, and we have a considerable inventory of premier North American onshore assets. However, our North American onshore assets have consistently provided us our highest risk-adjusted investment returns. By selling our offshore assets, we can more aggressively pursue the untapped value of these North American onshore opportunities. Besides reducing debt, the offshore divestiture proceeds are expected to provide significant funds to redeploy into our prolific North American onshore opportunities. With these added funds, we plan to accelerate the growth and realization of the value of our North American onshore assets.

 

As a result of the planned divestitures of our offshore assets, all amounts in this document related to our International operations are presented as discontinued. Therefore, financial data and operational data, such as reserves, production, wells and acreage, provided in this document exclude amounts related to our International operations unless otherwise provided.

 

Even though we are also divesting our U.S. Offshore operations, these properties do not qualify as discontinued operations under accounting rules. As such, financial and operational data provided in this document that pertain to our continuing operations include amounts related to our U.S. Offshore operations. Where appropriate, we have presented amounts related to our U.S. Offshore assets separate from those of our North American Onshore assets.

 

 

Since our first issuance of common stock to the public in 1988, we have executed strategies that have always been focused on growth and value creation for our shareholders. We increased our total proved reserves from 8 MMBoe at year-end 1987 to 2,733 MMBoe at year-end 2009. During this same time period, we increased annual production from 1 MMBoe in 1987 to 233 MMBoe in 2009. Our expansion over this time period is attributable to a focused mergers and acquisitions program spanning a number of years, as well as active and successful exploration and development programs in more recent years. Additionally, our growth has provided meaningful value creation for our shareholders. The growth statistics from 1987 to 2009 translate into annual per share growth rates of 11% for production and 8% for reserves.

 

As a result of this growth, we have become one of the largest independent oil and gas companies in North America. During 2009, we continued to build off our past successes with a number of key accomplishments, including those discussed below.

 

 

Construction continued throughout 2009 on a second phase of the Jackfish project. Jackfish 2 is also sized to produce 35 MBbls of oil per day and will commence operations in 2011. We expect to file a regulatory application for a third phase of the project in the third quarter of 2010.

 

 

Notes 20 and 22 to the consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this report contain information on our segments and geographical areas.

 

 

The spot markets for oil, gas and NGLs are subject to volatility as supply and demand factors fluctuate. As detailed below, we sell our production under both long-term (one year or more) or short-term (less than one year) agreements. Regardless of the term of the contract, the vast majority of our production is sold at variable or market sensitive prices.

 

Additionally, we may periodically enter into financial hedging arrangements or fixed-price contracts associated with a portion of our oil and gas production. These activities are intended to support targeted price levels and to manage our exposure to price fluctuations. See “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

 

 

Our oil production is sold under both long-term and short-term agreements at prices negotiated with third parties. Although exact percentages vary daily, as of January 2010, approximately 81% of our oil production was sold under short-term contracts at variable or market-sensitive prices. The remaining 19% of oil production was sold under long-term, market-indexed contracts that are subject to market pricing variations.

 

 

Our gas production is also sold under both long-term and short-term agreements at prices negotiated with third parties. Although exact percentages vary daily, as of January 2010, approximately 86% of our gas production was sold under short-term contracts at variable or market-sensitive prices. These market-sensitive sales are referred to as “spot market” sales. Another 13% of our production was committed under various long-term contracts, which dedicate the gas to a purchaser for an extended period of time, but still at market-sensitive prices. The remaining 1% of our gas production was sold under long-term, fixed-price contracts.

 

 

Our NGL production is sold under both long-term and short-term agreements at prices negotiated with third parties. Although exact percentages vary, as of January 2010, approximately 90% of our NGL production was sold under short-term contracts at variable or market-sensitive prices. The remaining 10% of NGL production was sold under short-term, fixed-price contracts.

 

 

The primary objective of our marketing and midstream operations is to add value to us and other producers to whom we provide such services by gathering, processing and marketing oil, gas and NGL production in a timely and efficient manner. Our most significant midstream asset is the Bridgeport processing plant and gathering system located in north Texas. These facilities serve not only our gas production from the Barnett Shale but also gas production of other producers in the area. Our midstream assets also include our 50% interest in the Access Pipeline transportation system in Canada. This pipeline system allows us to blend our Jackfish heavy oil production with condensate and transport the combined product to the Edmonton area for sale.

Our marketing and midstream revenues are primarily generated by:

 

 

Our marketing and midstream costs and expenses are primarily incurred from:

 

 

 

We sell our gas production to a variety of customers including pipelines, utilities, gas marketing firms, industrial users and local distribution companies. Gathering systems and interstate and intrastate pipelines are used to consummate gas sales and deliveries.

 

The principal customers for our crude oil production are refiners, remarketers and other companies, some of which have pipeline facilities near the producing properties. In the event pipeline facilities are not conveniently available, crude oil is trucked or shipped to storage, refining or pipeline facilities.

 

Our NGL production is primarily sold to customers engaged in petrochemical, refining and heavy oil blending activities. Pipelines, railcars and trucks are utilized to move our products to market.

 

During 2009, 2008 and 2007, no purchaser accounted for over 10% of our revenues.

 

 

Generally, but not always, the demand for natural gas decreases during the summer months and increases during the winter months. Seasonal anomalies such as mild winters or hot summers sometimes lessen this fluctuation. In addition, pipelines, utilities, local distribution companies and industrial users utilize natural gas storage facilities and purchase some of their anticipated winter requirements during the summer. This can also lessen seasonal demand fluctuations.

 

 

The oil and gas industry is subject to various types of regulation throughout the world. Laws, rules, regulations and other policy implementations affecting the oil and gas industry have been pervasive and are under constant review for amendment or expansion. Pursuant to public policy changes, numerous government agencies have issued extensive laws and regulations binding on the oil and gas industry and its individual members, some of which carry substantial penalties for failure to comply. Such laws and regulations have a significant impact on oil and gas exploration, production and marketing and midstream activities. These laws and regulations increase the cost of doing business and, consequently, affect profitability. Because public policy changes affecting the oil and gas industry are commonplace and because existing laws and regulations are frequently amended or reinterpreted, we are unable to predict the future cost or impact of complying with such laws and regulations. However, we do not expect that any of these laws and regulations will affect our operations in a manner materially different than they would affect other oil and gas companies of similar size and financial strength.

 

The following are significant areas of government control and regulation in the United States, Canada and other international locations in which we operate.

 

Our oil and gas operations are subject to various federal, state, provincial, tribal, local and international laws and regulations. These regulations relate to matters that include, but are not limited to:

 

 

Our operations also are subject to conservation regulations, including the regulation of the size of drilling and spacing units or proration units; the number of wells that may be drilled in a unit; the rate of production allowable from oil and gas wells; and the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties. In the United States, some states allow the forced pooling or integration of tracts to facilitate exploration, while other states rely on voluntary pooling of lands and leases, which may make it more difficult to develop oil and gas properties. In addition, state conservation laws generally limit the venting or flaring of natural gas and impose certain requirements regarding the ratable purchase of production. The effect of these regulations is to limit the amounts of oil and gas we can produce from our wells and to limit the number of wells or the locations at which we can drill.

 

Certain of our U.S. natural gas and oil leases are granted by the federal government and administered by various federal agencies, including the Bureau of Land Management and the Minerals Management Service (“MMS”) of the Department of the Interior. Such leases require compliance with detailed federal regulations and orders that regulate, among other matters, drilling and operations on lands covered by these leases, and calculation and disbursement of royalty payments to the federal government. The MMS has been particularly active in recent years in evaluating and, in some cases, promulgating new rules and regulations regarding competitive lease bidding and royalty payment obligations for production from federal lands. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission also has jurisdiction over certain U.S. offshore activities pursuant to the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act.

 

 

The royalty system in Canada is a significant factor in the profitability of oil and gas production. Royalties payable on production from lands other than Crown lands are determined by negotiations between the parties. Crown royalties are determined by government regulation and are generally calculated as a percentage of the value of the gross production, with the royalty rate dependent in part upon prescribed reference prices, well productivity, geographical location, field discovery date and the type and quality of the petroleum product produced. From time to time, the federal and provincial governments of Canada also have established incentive programs such as royalty rate reductions, royalty holidays, tax credits and fixed rate and profit-sharing royalties for the purpose of encouraging oil and gas exploration or enhanced recovery projects. These incentives generally have the effect of increasing our revenues, earnings and cash flow.

The provincial government of Alberta enacted a new royalty regime effective January 1, 2009. The new regime links royalties to price and production levels and applies to both new and existing conventional oil and gas activities and oil sands projects. This regime has generally reduced our proved reserves and production in Alberta, as well as the related earnings and cash flows. Similar effects have been experienced throughout the oil and gas industry in Alberta. Acknowledging this impact on the industry, the government of Alberta has announced a competitiveness review to assess the impact to the industry as a result of the royalty changes. However, we are uncertain whether the current regime will be modified.

 

 

Any oil or gas export to be made pursuant to an export contract that exceeds a certain duration or a certain quantity requires an exporter to obtain export authorizations from Canada’s National Energy Board (“NEB”). The governments of Alberta, British Columbia and Saskatchewan also regulate the volume of natural gas that may be removed from those provinces for consumption elsewhere.

 

 

Some of our international licenses are governed by production sharing contracts (“PSCs”) between the concessionaires and the granting government agency. PSCs are contracts that define and regulate the framework for investments, revenue sharing, and taxation of mineral interests in foreign countries. Unlike most domestic leases, PSCs have defined production terms and time limits of generally 30 years. PSCs also generally contain sliding scale revenue sharing provisions. As a result, at either higher production rates or higher cumulative rates of return, PSCs generally allow the government agency to retain higher fractions of revenue.

 

 

We are subject to various federal, state, provincial, tribal, local and international laws and regulations concerning occupational safety and health as well as the discharge of materials into, and the protection of, the environment. Environmental laws and regulations relate to, among other things:

 

 

The application of worldwide standards, such as ISO 14000 governing environmental management systems, is required to be implemented for some international oil and gas operations.

 

We consider the costs of environmental protection and safety and health compliance necessary and manageable parts of our business. We have been able to plan for and comply with environmental, safety and health initiatives without materially altering our operating strategy or incurring significant unreimbursed expenditures. However, based on regulatory trends and increasingly stringent laws, our capital expenditures and operating expenses related to the protection of the environment and safety and health compliance have increased over the years and will likely continue to increase. We cannot predict with any reasonable degree of certainty our future exposure concerning such matters.

 

We maintain levels of insurance customary in the industry to limit our financial exposure in the event of a substantial environmental claim resulting from sudden, unanticipated and accidental discharges of oil, salt water or other substances. However, we do not maintain 100% coverage concerning any environmental claim, and no coverage is maintained with respect to any penalty or fine required to be paid because of a violation of law.

 

Policy makers in the United States are increasingly focusing on whether the emissions of “greenhouse gases,” such as carbon dioxide and methane, are contributing to the warming of the Earth’s atmosphere and other climatic changes. However, there is currently no settled scientific consensus on whether, or the extent to which, human-derived greenhouse gas emissions contribute to climatic change. As an oil and gas company, the debate on climate change is relevant to our operations because the equipment we use to explore for, develop, produce and process oil and natural gas emits greenhouse gases. Additionally, the combustion of carbon-based fuels, such as the oil, gas and NGLs we sell, emits carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. As a result, some believe that combustion of carbon-based fuels contributes to climate change.

 

Despite the lack of a settled scientific consensus on human-derived impacts on climate change, policy makers at both the United States federal and state level have introduced legislation and proposed new regulations that are designed to quantify and limit the emission of greenhouse gases through inventories and limitations on greenhouse gas emissions. Legislative initiatives to date have focused on the development of “cap and trade” programs. These programs generally would cap overall greenhouse gas emissions on an economy-wide basis and require major sources of greenhouse gas emissions or major fuel producers to acquire and surrender emission allowances. As a result of a gradually declining cap, the number of government-issued allowances and allowances available for trade would be reduced each year until the overall goal of greenhouse gas emission reductions is achieved.

 

Because no final legislation or regulations limiting greenhouse gas emissions have been enacted at this time, it is not possible to estimate the costs or operational impacts we could experience to comply with new legislative or regulatory developments. Although we do not anticipate that we would be impacted to any greater degree than other similar oil and gas companies, a stringent greenhouse gas control program could increase our cost of doing business and reduce demand for the oil and natural gas that we sell. However, to the extent that any particular greenhouse gas program directly or indirectly encourages the use of natural gas, demand for the natural gas we sell could increase.

 

The Kyoto Protocol was adopted by numerous countries in 1997 and implemented in 2005. The Protocol requires reductions of certain emissions of greenhouse gases. Although the United States has not ratified the Protocol, certain countries in which we operate have. Canada ratified the Protocol in April 2007 and released its Regulatory Framework for Air Emissions. The Canadian framework is a plan to implement mandatory reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. The mandatory reductions on greenhouse gas emissions will create additional costs for the Canadian oil and gas industry, including us. Certain provinces in Canada also have implemented or are currently implementing legislation and regulations to report and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which also will carry a cost associated with compliance. Presently, it is not possible to accurately estimate the costs we could incur to comply with any laws or regulations developed to achieve emissions reductions in Canada or elsewhere, but such expenditures could be substantial.

 

In 2006, we established our Corporate Climate Change Position and Strategy. Key components of the strategy include initiation of energy efficiency measures, tracking emerging climate change legislation and publication of a corporate greenhouse gas emission inventory. We last published our emission inventory on January 2008. We will publish another emission inventory on or before March 31, 2011 to comply with a reporting mandate issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Additionally, we continue to explore energy efficiency measures and greenhouse emission reduction opportunities. We also continue to monitor legislative and regulatory climate change developments, such as the proposals described above.

 

 

As of December 31, 2009, we had approximately 5,400 employees. We consider labor relations with our employees to be satisfactory. We have not had any work stoppages or strikes pertaining to our employees.

 

 

See “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”

 

Through our website,http://www.devonenergy.com,we make available electronic copies of the charters of the committees of our Board of Directors, other documents related to our corporate governance (including our Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer), and documents we file or furnish to the SEC, including our annual reports onForm 10-K,quarterly reports onForm 10-Q,and current reports onForm 8-K,as well as any amendments to these reports. Access to these electronic filings is available free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after filing or furnishing them to the SEC. Printed copies of our committee charters or other governance documents and filings can be requested by writing to our corporate secretary at the address on the cover of this report.

 

 

Our business activities, and the oil and gas industry in general, are subject to a variety of risks. If any of the following risk factors should occur, our profitability, financial condition or liquidity could be materially impacted. As a result, holders of our securities could lose part or all of their investment in Devon.

 

 

Our financial results are highly dependent on the prices of and demand for oil, gas and NGLs. A significant downward movement of the prices for these commodities could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, operating cash flows and profitability. Such a downward price movement could also have a material adverse effect on our estimated proved reserves, the carrying value of our oil and gas properties, the level of planned drilling activities and future growth. Historically, prices have been volatile and are likely to continue to be volatile in the future due to numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include, but are not limited to:

 

 

 

The process of estimating oil, gas and NGL reserves is complex and requires significant judgment in the evaluation of available geological, engineering and economic data for each reservoir, particularly for new discoveries. Because of the high degree of judgment involved, different reserve engineers may develop different estimates of reserve quantities and related revenue based on the same data. In addition, the reserve estimates for a given reservoir may change substantially over time as a result of several factors including additional development activity, the viability of production under varying economic conditions and variations in production levels and associated costs. Consequently, material revisions to existing reserve estimates may occur as a result of changes in any of these factors. Such revisions to proved reserves could have a material adverse effect on our estimates of future net revenue, as well as our financial condition and profitability.

Additional discussion of our policies and internal controls related to estimating and recording reserves is described in “Item 2. Properties — Preparation of Reserves Estimates and Reserves Audits.”

 

 

The production rates from oil and gas properties generally decline as reserves are depleted, while related per unit production costs generally increase, due to decreasing reservoir pressures and other factors. Therefore, our estimated proved reserves and future oil, gas and NGL production will decline materially as reserves are produced unless we conduct successful exploration and development activities or, through engineering studies, identify additional producing zones in existing wells, secondary recovery reserves or tertiary recovery reserves, or acquire additional properties containing proved reserves. Consequently, our future oil, gas and NGL production and related per unit production costs are highly dependent upon our level of success in finding or acquiring additional reserves.

 

 

Substantial costs are often required to locate and acquire properties and drill exploratory wells. Such activities are subject to numerous risks, including the risk that we will not encounter commercially productive oil or gas reservoirs. The costs of drilling and completing wells are often uncertain. In addition, oil and gas properties can become damaged or drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of a variety of factors including, but not limited to:

 

 

A significant occurrence of one of these factors could result in a partial or total loss of our investment in a particular property. In addition, drilling activities may not be successful in establishing proved reserves. Such a failure could have an adverse effect on our future results of operations and financial condition. While both exploratory and developmental drilling activities involve these risks, exploratory drilling involves greater risks of dry holes or failure to find commercial quantities of hydrocarbons. We are currently performing exploratory drilling activities in certain international countries. We have been granted drilling concessions in these countries that require commitments on our behalf to incur capital expenditures. Even if future drilling activities are unsuccessful in establishing proved reserves, we will likely be required to fulfill our commitments to make such capital expenditures.

 

 

Strong competition exists in all sectors of the oil and gas industry. We compete with major integrated and other independent oil and gas companies for the acquisition of oil and gas leases and properties. We also compete for the equipment and personnel required to explore, develop and operate properties. Competition is also prevalent in the marketing of oil, gas and NGLs. Typically, during times of high or rising commodity prices, drilling and operating costs will also increase. Higher prices will also generally increase the costs of properties available for acquisition. Certain of our competitors have financial and other resources substantially

larger than ours. They also may have established strategic long-term positions and relationships in areas in which we may seek new entry. As a consequence, we may be at a competitive disadvantage in bidding for drilling rights. In addition, many of our larger competitors may have a competitive advantage when responding to factors that affect demand for oil and gas production, such as changing worldwide price and production levels, the cost and availability of alternative fuels, and the application of government regulations.

 

 

Our operations outside North America are based primarily in Azerbaijan, Brazil and China. As noted earlier in this report, we are in the process of divesting our operations outside North America. However, until we cease operating in these locations, we face political and economic risks and other uncertainties in these areas that are more prevalent than what exist for our operations in North America. Such factors include, but are not limited to:

 

 

Foreign countries have occasionally asserted rights to oil and gas properties through border disputes. If a country claims superior rights to oil and gas leases or concessions granted to us by another country, our interests could decrease in value or be lost. Even our smaller international assets may affect our overall business and results of operations by distracting management’s attention from our more significant assets. Various regions of the world have a history of political and economic instability. This instability could result in new governments or the adoption of new policies that might result in a substantially more hostile attitude toward foreign investment. In an extreme case, such a change could result in termination of contract rights and expropriation of foreign-owned assets. This could adversely affect our interests and our future profitability.

 

The impact that future terrorist attacks or regional hostilities may have on the oil and gas industry in general, and on our operations in particular, is not known at this time. Uncertainty surrounding military strikes or a sustained military campaign may affect our operations in unpredictable ways, including disruptions of fuel supplies and markets, particularly oil, and the possibility that infrastructure facilities, including pipelines, production facilities, processing plants and refineries, could be direct targets of, or indirect casualties of, an act of terror or war. We may be required to incur significant costs in the future to safeguard our assets against terrorist activities.

 

 

Our operations are subject to federal laws, rules and regulations in the United States, Canada and the other countries in which we operate. In addition, we are also subject to the laws and regulations of various

states, provinces, tribal and local governments. Pursuant to public policy changes, numerous government departments and agencies have issued extensive rules and regulations binding on the oil and gas industry and its individual members, some of which carry substantial penalties for failure to comply. Changes in such public policy have affected, and at times in the future could affect, our operations. Political developments can restrict production levels, enact price controls, change environmental protection requirements, and increase taxes, royalties and other amounts payable to governments or governmental agencies. Although we are unable to predict changes to existing laws and regulations, such changes could significantly impact our profitability. While public policy can change at any time in the future, those laws and regulations outside North America to which we are subject generally include greater risk of unforeseen change.

 

 

As an owner, lessee or operator of oil and gas properties, we are subject to various federal, state, provincial, tribal, local and international laws and regulations relating to discharge of materials into, and protection of, the environment. These laws and regulations may, among other things, impose liability on us for the cost of pollutionclean-upresulting from our operations in affected areas. Any future environmental costs of fulfilling our commitments to the environment are uncertain and will be governed by several factors, including future changes to regulatory requirements. There is no assurance that changes in or additions to public policy regarding the protection of the environment will not have a significant impact on our operations and profitability.

 

 

Exploration, development, production and processing of oil, gas and NGLs can be hazardous and involve unforeseen occurrences such as hurricanes, blowouts, cratering, fires and loss of well control. These occurrences can result in damage to or destruction of wells or production facilities, injury to persons, loss of life, or damage to property or the environment. We maintain insurance against certain losses or liabilities in accordance with customary industry practices and in amounts that management believes to be prudent. However, insurance against all operational risks is not available to us. Due to changes in the insurance marketplace following hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico in recent years, we currently do not have coverage for any damage that may be caused by future named windstorms in the Gulf of Mexico.

 

 

To maximize earnings on available cash balances, we periodically invest in securities that we consider to be short-term in nature and generally available for short-term liquidity needs. During 2007, we purchased asset-backed securities that have an auction rate reset feature (“auction rate securities”). Our auction rate securities generally have contractual maturities of more than 20 years. However, the underlying interest rates on our securities are scheduled to reset every seven to 28 days. Therefore, when we bought these securities, they were generally priced and subsequently traded as short-term investments because of the interest rate reset feature. At December 31, 2009, our auction rate securities totaled $115 million.

 

Since February 8, 2008, we have experienced difficulty selling our securities due to the failure of the auction mechanism, which provided liquidity to these securities. An auction failure means that the parties wishing to sell securities could not do so. The securities for which auctions have failed will continue to accrue interest and be auctioned every seven to 28 days until the auction succeeds, the issuer calls the securities or the securities mature. Due to continued auction failures throughout 2009, we consider these investments to be long-term in nature and generally not available for short-term liquidity needs.

 

Our auction rate securities are rated AAA — the highest rating — by one or more rating agencies and are collateralized by student loans that are substantially guaranteed by the United States government. These investments are subject to general credit, liquidity, market and interest rate risks, which may be exacerbated by problems in the global credit markets, including but not limited to, U.S. subprime mortgage defaults and writedowns by major financial institutions due to deteriorating values of their asset portfolios. These and other related factors have affected various sectors of the financial markets and caused credit and liquidity issues. If

issuers are unable to successfully close future auctions and their credit ratings deteriorate, our ability to liquidate these securities and fully recover the carrying value of our investment in the near term may be limited. Under such circumstances, we may record an impairment charge on these investments in the future.

 

 

Not applicable.

 

 

 

Our oil and gas operations are concentrated in various North American onshore areas in the United States and Canada. We also have offshore operations that are situated principally in the Gulf of Mexico and regions located offshore Azerbaijan, Brazil and China. As previously mentioned, we are in the process of divesting our offshore assets. Our properties consist of interests in developed and undeveloped oil and gas leases and mineral acreage in these regions. These interests entitle us to drill for and produce oil, gas and NGLs from specific areas. Our interests are mostly in the form of working interests and, to a lesser extent, overriding royalty, mineral and net profits interests, foreign government concessions and other forms of direct and indirect ownership in oil and gas properties.

 

We also have certain midstream assets, including natural gas and NGL processing plants and pipeline systems. Our most significant midstream assets are our assets serving the Barnett Shale region in north Texas. These assets include approximately 3,100 miles of pipeline, two natural gas processing plants with 750 MMcf per day of total capacity, and a 15 MBbls per day NGL fractionator. To support our continued development and growing production in the Woodford Shale, located in southeastern Oklahoma, we constructed the Northridge natural gas processing plant in 2008. The Northridge plant has a capacity of 200 MMcf per day.

 

Our midstream assets also include the Access Pipeline transportation system in Canada. This220-miledual pipeline system extends from our Jackfish operations in northern Alberta to a 350 MBbls storage terminal near Edmonton. The dual pipeline system allows us to blend the Jackfish heavy oil production with condensate and transport the combined product to the Edmonton crude oil market for sale. We have a 50% ownership interest in the Access Pipeline.

The following sections provide additional details of our oil and gas properties, including information about proved reserves, production, wells, acreage and drilling activities.

 

 

The locations of our key North American Onshore properties are presented on the following map.

 

The following table presents proved reserve information for our key properties as of December 31, 2009, along with their production volumes for the year 2009. Additional summary profile information for our key properties is provided following the table. Our key properties include those that currently have significant proved reserves or production. These key properties also include properties that do not have current significant levels of proved reserves or production, but are expected be the source of future significant growth in proved reserves and production.

 

 

 

 

 

Barnett Shale — The Barnett Shale, located in north Texas, is our largest property both in terms of production and proved reserves. Our leases include approximately 663,000 net acres located primarily in Denton, Johnson, Parker, Tarrant and Wise counties. The Barnett Shale is a non-conventional reservoir and it produces natural gas and NGLs. We have an average working interest of 89%. We drilled 336 gross wells in 2009 and plan to drill approximately 370 gross wells in 2010.

Carthage — The Carthage area in east Texas includes primarily Harrison, Marion, Panola and Shelby counties. Our average working interest is about 86% and we hold approximately 218,000 net acres. Our Carthage area wells produce primarily natural gas and NGLs from conventional reservoirs. We drilled 39 gross wells in 2009 and plan to drill approximately 30 gross wells in 2010.

 

Permian Basin, Texas — Our oil and gas properties in the Permian Basin of west Texas comprise approximately 850,000 net acres located across several counties in west Texas. These properties produce both oil and gas from conventional reservoirs. Our average working interest in these properties is about 40%. In 2009, we drilled 80 gross wells and plan to drill approximately 220 gross wells in 2010.

 

Washakie — Our Washakie area leases are concentrated in Carbon and Sweetwater counties in southern Wyoming. Our average working interest is about 76% and we hold about 157,000 net acres in the area. The Washakie wells produce primarily natural gas from conventional reservoirs. In 2009, we drilled 94 gross wells and plan to drill approximately 115 gross wells in 2010.

 

Cana-Woodford Shale — The Cana-Woodford Shale is located in Canadian, Blaine and Caddo counties in western Oklahoma. Our average working interest is approximately 46% and we hold approximately 117,000 net acres. Our Cana-Woodford Shale properties produce natural gas and NGLs from a non-conventional reservoir. We drilled 47 gross wells in 2009 and plan to drill approximately 85 gross wells in 2010. To support our growing production in the Cana-Woodford Shale, we are building a 200 MMcf per day natural gas processing facility. We expect to complete this facility in early 2011.

 

Arkoma-Woodford Shale — Our Arkoma-Woodford Shale properties in southeastern Oklahoma produce natural gas and NGLs from a non-conventional reservoir. Our 58,000 net acres are concentrated in Coal and Hughes counties, and we have an average working interest of about 32%. In 2009, we drilled 61 gross wells in this area and plan to drill approximately 85 gross wells in 2010.

 

Groesbeck — The Groesbeck area of east Texas includes portions of Freestone, Leon, Limestone and Robertson counties. Our average working interest is approximately 72% and we hold about 132,000 net acres of land. The Groesbeck wells produce primarily natural gas from conventional reservoirs. In 2009, we drilled 13 gross wells and plan to drill approximately 10 gross wells in 2010.

 

Haynesville Shale — Our Haynesville Shale acreage spans across east Texas and north Louisiana with an average working interest of 92%. To date, our drilling activity has been focused on de-risking the 157,000 acres located in Panola, Shelby and San Augustine counties in east Texas. We drilled 8 gross wells in 2009 and plan to drill approximately 30 gross wells in 2010.

 

 

Jackfish — Jackfish is our 100%-owned thermal heavy oil project in the non-conventional oil sands of east central Alberta. We are employing steam-assisted gravity drainage at Jackfish. In late 2009, Jackfish’s gross production reached 33.7 MBbls of oil per day. Gross peak production is expected to be 35 MBbls per day with a flat production profile for greater than 20 years. We are currently constructing the second phase of Jackfish and evaluating the potential for a third phase. The second and third phases of Jackfish are each expected to also eventually produce 35 MBbls per day of heavy oil production.

 

Northwest — The Northwest region includes acreage within west central Alberta and northeast British Columbia. We hold approximately 1.9 million net acres in the region, which produces primarily natural gas and NGLs from conventional reservoirs. Our average working interest in the area is approximately 73%. In 2009, we drilled 36 gross wells and plan to drill approximately 55 gross wells in 2010.

 

Lloydminster — Our Lloydminster properties are located to the south and east of Jackfish in eastern Alberta and western Saskatchewan. Lloydminster produces heavy oil by conventional means without steam injection. We hold 2.5 million net acres and have an 89% average working interest in our Lloydminster properties. In 2009, we drilled 239 gross wells and plan to drill approximately 140 gross wells in 2010.

 

Deep Basin — Our properties in Canada’s Deep Basin include portions of west central Alberta and east central British Columbia. We hold approximately 570,000 net acres in the Deep Basin. The area produces

primarily natural gas and natural gas liquids from conventional reservoirs. Our average working interest in the Deep Basin is 45%. In 2009, we drilled 30 gross wells and plan to drill approximately 35 gross wells in 2010.

 

Horn River Basin — The Horn River Basin, located in northeast British Columbia, is a non-conventional reservoir targeting the Devonian Shale. Our leases include approximately 170,000 net acres with a 100% working interest. We drilled 2 gross wells in 2009. During 2010, we plan to drill 11 gross wells, consisting of 7 horizontal wells and 4 vertical stratigraphic-test wells.

 

 

Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from known reservoirs under existing economic conditions, operating methods and government regulations. To be considered proved, oil and gas reserves must be economically producible before contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain. Also, the project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

 

The process of estimating oil, gas and NGL reserves is complex and requires significant judgment as discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” As a result, we have developed internal policies for estimating and recording reserves. Our policies regarding booking reserves require proved reserves to be in compliance with the SEC definitions and guidance. Our policies assign responsibilities for compliance in reserves bookings to our Reserve Evaluation Group (the “Group”). These same policies also require that reserve estimates be made by professionally qualified reserves estimators (“Qualified Estimators”), as defined by the Society of Petroleum Engineers’ standards.

 

The Group, which is led by Devon’s Director of Reserves and Economics, is responsible for the internal review and certification of reserves estimates. We ensure the Group’s Director and key members of the Group have appropriate technical qualifications to oversee the preparation of reserves estimates. Such qualifications include any or all of the following:

 

 

The current Director of the Group and the Group’s key members all have the qualifications listed above. Additionally, the Group reports independently of any of our operating divisions. The Group’s Director reports to our Senior Vice President of Strategic Development, who reports to our President. No portion of the Group’s compensation is directly dependent on the quantity of reserves booked.

 

Throughout the year, the Group performs internal audits of each operating division’s reserves. Selection criteria of reserves that are audited include major fields and major additions and revisions to reserves. In addition, the Group reviews reserve estimates with each of the third-party petroleum consultants discussed below. The Group also ensures our Qualified Estimators obtain continuing education related to the fundamentals of SEC proved reserves assignments.

 

The Group also oversees audits and reserves estimates performed by third-party consulting firms. During 2009, we engaged three such firms to both prepare and audit a significant portion of our proved reserves. Ryder Scott Company, L.P. prepared the 2009 reserve estimates for all of our offshore Gulf of Mexico properties and for 99% of our International proved reserves. LaRoche Petroleum Consultants, Ltd. audited the 2009 reserve estimates for 93% of our domestic onshore properties. AJM Petroleum Consultants audited 91% of our Canadian reserves.

Set forth below is a summary of the North American reserves that were evaluated, either by preparation or audit, by independent petroleum consultants for each of the years ended 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 

 

“Prepared” reserves are those quantities of reserves that were prepared by an independent petroleum consultant. “Audited” reserves are those quantities of reserves that were estimated by our employees and audited by an independent petroleum consultant. An audit is an examination of a company’s proved oil and gas reserves and net cash flow by an independent petroleum consultant that is conducted for the purpose of expressing an opinion as to whether such estimates, in aggregate, are reasonable and have been estimated and presented in conformity with generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation principles.

 

In addition to conducting these internal and external reviews, we also have a Reserves Committee that consists of three independent members of our Board of Directors. Although we are not required to have a Reserves Committee, we established ours in 2004 to provide additional oversight of our reserves estimation and certification process. The Reserves Committee was designed to assist the Board of Directors with its duties and responsibilities in evaluating and reporting our proved reserves, much like our Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in supervising our audit and financial reporting requirements. Besides being independent, the members of our Reserves Committee also have educational backgrounds in geology or petroleum engineering, as well as experience relevant to the reserves estimation process.

 

The Reserves Committee meets at least twice a year to discuss reserves issues and policies, and periodically meets separately with our senior reserves engineering personnel and our independent petroleum consultants. The responsibilities of the Reserves Committee include the following:

 

 

 

The following table presents our estimated proved reserves by continent and for each significant country as of December 31, 2009. These estimates correspond with the method used in presenting the “Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Operations” in Note 22 to our consolidated financial statements included in this report.

 

 

 

 

No estimates of our proved reserves have been filed with or included in reports to any federal or foreign governmental authority or agency since the beginning of 2009 except in filings with the SEC and the Department of Energy (“DOE”). Reserve estimates filed with the SEC correspond with the estimates of our reserves contained herein. Reserve estimates filed with the DOE are based upon the same underlying technical and economic assumptions as the estimates of our reserves included herein. However, the DOE requires reports to include the interests of all owners in wells that we operate and to exclude all interests in wells that we do not operate.

 

As presented in the previous table, we had 1,922 MMBoe of proved developed reserves at December 31, 2009. Proved developed reserves consist of proved developed producing reserves and proved developed non-producing reserves. The following table provides additional information regarding our proved developed reserves at December 31, 2009.

 

 

 

 

 

The following table presents the changes in our total proved undeveloped reserves during 2009 (in MMBoe).

 

 

During 2009, our proved undeveloped reserves increased 91%. A large contributor to the increase was our 2009 drilling activities, which increased our proved undeveloped reserves 316 MMBoe. Also as a result of 2009 drilling activities, we converted 81 MMBoe, or 19%, of the 2008 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves.

 

Our proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2009 largely relate to our operations at Jackfish and the Barnett Shale. Additionally, the 2009 positive revisions due to prices largely related to Jackfish. At the end of 2008, none of our Jackfish reserves were classified as proved due to low oil prices. However, as oil prices rebounded during 2009, our Jackfish reserves, including the reserves that were undeveloped at the end of 2008, once again became economic and were classified as proved at the end of 2009. The positive revision related to Jackfish reserves was partially offset by decreases in proved undeveloped gas reserves related to certain of our North American Onshore properties.

At the end of 2009, approximately 1% of our proved reserves had been classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years. The majority of such reserves relate to our deepwater Gulf of Mexico operations where sanctioned development projects often take longer than five years to complete.

 

 

The following table presents estimated cash flow information related to our December 31, 2009 estimated proved reserves. Similar to reserves, the cash flow estimates correspond with the method used in presenting the “Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Operations” in Note 22 to our consolidated financial statements included in this report.

 

 

 

 

 

The following tables present our production and average sales prices by continent and for each significant field and country for the past three years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table presents our production cost per Boe by continent and for each significant field and country for the past three years. Production costs do not include ad valorem or severance taxes.

 

 

The following tables summarize our development and exploratory drilling results for the past three years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table presents the results, as of February 1, 2010, of our wells that were in progress as of December 31, 2009.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth our producing wells as of December 31, 2009.

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth our developed and undeveloped oil and gas lease and mineral acreage as of December 31, 2009.