UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2019
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-36192
Civista Bancshares, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ohio
34-1558688
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
100 East Water Street, Sandusky, Ohio
44870
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (419) 625-4121
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common
CIVB
NASDAQ Capital Market
Preferred
CIVBP
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. Common Shares, no par value, outstanding at August 5, 2019—15,650,082 shares
CIVISTA BANCSHARES, INC.
Index
PART I.
Financial Information
Item 1.
Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018
2
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) Three- and six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
3
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) Three- and six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)Three- and six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) Six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
7
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
8-36
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
37-47
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
48-49
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
50
PART II.
Other Information
Legal Proceedings
51
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Defaults upon Senior Securities
Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5.
Item 6.
Exhibits
52
Signatures
53
Part I – Financial Information
ITEM 1.
Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
June 30, 2019
December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Cash and due from financial institutions
$
49,839
42,779
Securities available for sale
359,473
346,294
Equity securities
1,039
1,070
Loans held for sale
2,563
1,391
Loans, net of allowance of $13,786 and $13,679
1,584,984
1,548,262
Other securities
20,280
21,021
Premises and equipment, net
21,720
22,021
Accrued interest receivable
7,350
6,723
Goodwill
76,851
Other intangible assets
8,855
9,352
Bank owned life insurance
44,491
43,037
Other assets
25,550
20,153
Total assets
2,202,995
2,138,954
LIABILITIES
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing
496,541
468,083
Interest-bearing
1,136,179
1,111,810
Total deposits
1,632,720
1,579,893
Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances
121,300
188,600
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
15,554
22,199
Other borrowings
55,000
5,000
Subordinated debentures
29,427
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
24,782
14,937
Total liabilities
1,878,783
1,840,056
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred shares, no par value, 200,000 shares authorized, Series B Preferred shares,
$1,000 liquidation preference, 10,120 shares issued, net of issuance costs
9,364
Common shares, no par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 16,381,023 shares
issued at June 30, 2019 and 16,351,463 shares issued at December 31, 2018
267,275
266,901
Retained earnings
56,199
41,320
Treasury shares, 747,964 common shares at cost
(17,235
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
8,609
(1,452
Total shareholders’ equity
324,212
298,898
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
See notes to interim unaudited consolidated financial statements
Page 2
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three months ended
Six Months Ended
June 30,
2019
2018
Interest and dividend income
Loans, including fees
21,657
14,144
42,619
27,783
Taxable securities
1,694
1,040
3,442
2,026
Tax-exempt securities
1,408
886
2,760
1,764
Federal funds sold and other
167
90
689
511
Total interest and dividend income
24,926
16,160
49,510
32,084
Interest expense
1,976
570
3,867
1,277
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
831
482
1,429
634
372
338
744
626
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other
10
9
Total interest expense
3,184
1,394
6,050
2,546
Net interest income
21,742
14,766
43,460
29,538
Provision for loan losses
—
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Noninterest income
Service charges
1,552
1,359
3,008
2,493
Net gain on sale of securities
6
14
Net gain (loss) on equity securities
(33
35
(31
75
Net gain on sale of loans
555
474
807
ATM/Interchange fees
951
588
1,857
1,142
Wealth management fees
911
836
1,758
1,688
252
144
499
286
Tax refund processing fees
550
2,750
Other
356
398
647
759
Total noninterest income
5,104
4,390
11,388
10,006
Noninterest expense
Compensation expense
9,548
7,385
19,353
14,759
Net occupancy expense
964
862
2,004
1,623
Equipment expense
480
324
943
698
Contracted data processing
447
2,739
866
3,087
FDIC assessment
106
116
298
267
State franchise tax
363
899
681
Professional services
700
1,483
1,395
2,035
Amortization of intangible assets
235
26
475
59
ATM expense
546
208
924
426
Marketing
367
320
707
638
Other operating expenses
2,747
2,102
5,224
3,860
Total noninterest expense
16,639
15,928
33,088
28,133
Income before taxes
10,207
3,228
21,760
11,411
Income tax expense
1,546
214
3,430
Net Income
8,661
3,014
18,330
10,003
Preferred stock dividends
164
299
328
602
Net income available to common shareholders
8,497
2,715
18,002
9,401
Earnings per common share, basic
0.54
0.26
1.15
0.91
Earnings per common share, diluted
0.51
0.24
1.08
0.79
Page 3
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of reclassification
adjustment:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on available for sale
securities
6,299
(684
12,441
(3,898
Tax effect
(1,323
143
(2,612
818
Pension liability adjustment
147
294
(30
(62
(60
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
5,092
(428
10,061
(2,854
Comprehensive income
13,753
2,586
28,391
7,149
Page 4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
Preferred Shares
Common Shares
Accumulated
Total
Outstanding
Shares
Amount
Retained
Earnings
Treasury
Comprehensive
Income
Shareholders’
Equity
Balance, March 31, 2019
10,120
15,624,113
266,990
49,421
3,517
312,057
Other comprehensive income
Stock-based compensation
8,946
285
Common stock dividends
($0.11 per share)
(1,719
($16.25 per share)
(164
Balance, June 30, 2019
15,633,059
Loss
Balance, March 30, 2018
18,409
17,034
10,243,274
154,170
37,902
(3,828
188,043
Other comprehensive loss
Conversion of Series B preferred
shares to common shares
(4,089
(3,784
522,904
3,784
22,714
237
($0.07 per share)
(719
(299
Balance, June 30, 2018
14,320
13,250
10,788,892
158,191
39,898
(4,256
189,848
Page 5
Income (loss)
Balance, December 31, 2018
15,603,499
29,560
374
($0.20 per share)
(3,123
($32.50 per share)
(328
Balance, December 31, 2017
18,760
17,358
10,198,475
153,810
31,652
(1,124
184,461
Change in accounting principle for
adoption of ASU 2016-01
278
(278
(4,440
(4,108
567,703
4,108
273
($0.14 per share)
(1,433
(602
Page 6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30,
Net cash from operating activities
20,369
5,324
Cash flows used for investing activities:
Maturities and calls of securities, available-for-sale
25,887
9,332
Purchases of securities, available-for-sale
(43,998
(14,606
Sale of securities available for sale
16,829
Redemption of other securities
741
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
(955
Net loan originations
(36,593
(15,382
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned properties
34
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
238
Premises and equipment purchases
(651
(292
Net cash used for investing activities
(38,740
(20,676
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of long-term FHLB advances
(10,000
Proceeds from long-term FHLB advances
50,000
Net change in short-term FHLB advances
(67,300
94,300
Increase (decrease) in deposits
52,827
(58,751
Decrease in securities sold under repurchase agreements
(6,645
(7,525
Common dividends paid
Preferred dividends paid
Net cash provided by financing activities
25,431
15,989
Increase in cash and due from financial institutions
7,060
637
Cash and due from financial institutions at beginning of period
40,519
Cash and due from financial institutions at end of period
41,156
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest
6,018
2,854
Income taxes
2,350
1,500
Supplemental cash flow information:
Transfer of loans held for sale to portfolio
85
Conversion of preferred shares to common shares
Securities purchased not settled
855
Increase in right-of-use asset on leases
(2,452
Increase in lease liability
2,452
Page 7
Form 10-Q
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements
Nature of Operations and Principles of Consolidation: Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CBI) is an Ohio corporation and a registered financial holding company. The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of CBI and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Civista Bank (Civista), First Citizens Insurance Agency, Inc. (FCIA), Water Street Properties, Inc. (Water St.), FC Refund Solutions, Inc. (FCRS) and CIVB Risk Management, Inc. (CRMI). FCRS was formed to facilitate payment of individual state and federal income tax refunds. CRMI is a wholly-owned captive insurance company which allows the Company to insure against certain risks unique to the operations of CBI and its subsidiaries. The operations of CRMI are located in Wilmington, Delaware. First Citizens Capital LLC (FCC) is wholly-owned by Civista and holds inter-company debt. The operations of FCC are located in Wilmington, Delaware. First Citizens Investments, Inc. (FCI) is wholly-owned by Civista and holds and manages its securities portfolio. The operations of FCI are located in Wilmington, Delaware. FCIA was formed to allow the Company to participate in commission revenue generated through its third party insurance agreement. Insurance commission revenue was less than 1.0% of total revenue through June 30, 2019. Water Street Properties was formed to hold properties repossessed by CBI subsidiaries. Revenue from Water St. was less than 1.0% of total revenue through June 30, 2019. The above companies together are referred to as the “Company.” Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Management considers the Company to operate primarily in one reportable segment, banking.
The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared by the Company without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2019 and its results of operations and changes in cash flows for the periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 have been made. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with instructions of Form 10-Q, and therefore certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America have been omitted. The results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year. Reference is made to the accounting policies of the Company described in the notes to the audited financial statements contained in the Company’s 2018 annual report. The Company has consistently followed these policies in preparing this Form 10-Q.
The Company provides financial services through its offices in the Ohio counties of Erie, Crawford, Champaign, Franklin, Logan, Madison, Summit, Huron, Ottawa, Richland, Montgomery and Cuyahoga, in the Indiana counties of Dearborn and Ripley and in the Kentucky county of Kenton. Its primary deposit products are checking, savings, and term certificate accounts, and its primary lending products are residential mortgage, commercial, and installment loans. Substantially all loans are secured by specific items of collateral including business assets, consumer assets and commercial and residential real estate. Commercial loans are expected to be repaid from cash flow from operations of businesses. Civista has two concentrations, one is to Lessors of Non-Residential Buildings and Dwellings totaling $411,239, or 25.7% of total loans, as of June 30, 2019, and the other is to Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellings totaling $160,518, or 10.0% of total loans, as of June 30, 2019. These segments of the portfolio are stable and have been conservatively underwritten, monitored and managed by experienced commercial bankers. However, the customers’ ability to repay their loans is dependent on the real estate market and general economic conditions in the area. Other financial instruments that potentially represent concentrations of credit risk include Federal Funds sold and deposit accounts in other financial institutions that are in excess of federally insured limits.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is regularly reviewed by management to determine that the amount is considered adequate to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. If not, an additional provision is made to increase the allowance. This evaluation includes specific loss estimates on certain individually reviewed impaired loans, the pooling of commercial credits risk graded as special mention and substandard that are not individually analyzed, and general loss estimates that are based upon the size, quality, and concentration characteristics of the various loan portfolios, adverse situations that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay, and current economic and industry conditions, among other items.
Page 8
Those judgments and assumptions that are most critical to the application of this accounting policy are assessing the initial and on-going credit-worthiness of the borrower, the amount and timing of future cash flows of the borrower that are available for repayment of the loan, the sufficiency of underlying collateral, the enforceability of third-party guarantees, the frequency and subjectivity of loan reviews and risk ratings, emerging or changing trends that might not be fully captured in the historical loss experience, and charges against the allowance for actual losses that are greater than previously estimated. These judgments and assumptions are dependent upon or can be influenced by a variety of factors, including the breadth and depth of experience of lending officers, credit administration and the corporate loan review staff that periodically review the status of the loan, changing economic and industry conditions, changes in the financial condition of the borrower and changes in the value and availability of the underlying collateral and guarantees.
Use of Estimates: To prepare financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management makes estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in financial statements and the disclosures provided, and future results could differ. The allowance for loan losses, impairment of goodwill, fair values of financial instruments, deferred taxes and pension obligations are particularly subject to change.
Income Taxes: Income tax expense is based on the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the entire year. Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Business Combinations: At the date of acquisition the Company records the assets and liabilities of acquired companies on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value. The results of operations for acquired companies are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations beginning at the acquisition date. Expenses arising from acquisition activities are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the period incurred.
Reclassifications: Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities: The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements to facilitate the risk management strategies of a small number of commercial banking customers. All derivatives are accounted for in accordance with ASC-815, Derivatives and Hedging. The Company mitigates the risk of entering into these agreements by entering into equal and offsetting swap agreements with highly rated third party financial institutions. The swap agreements are free-standing derivatives and are recorded at fair value in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company is party to master netting arrangements with its financial institution counterparties; however, the Company does not offset assets and liabilities under these arrangements for financial statement presentation purposes because the Company does not currently intend to execute a setoff with its counterparties. The master netting arrangements provide for a single net settlement of all swap agreements, as well as collateral, in the event of default on, or termination of, any one contract. Collateral, usually in the form of marketable securities, is posted by the counterparty with net liability positions in accordance with contract thresholds.
Change in Accounting Principal:
In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ('FASB') issued Accounting Standards Update ('ASU') 2017-08, Receivables – Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20). These amendments shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. We adopted ASU 2017-08, effective January 1, 2019, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards:
Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted FASB ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous guidance. The original guidance required application on a modified retrospective basis with the earliest period presented. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Targeted Improvements to ASC 842, which included an option to not restate comparative periods in transition and elect to use the effective date of ASC 842, Leases, as the date of initial application of transition, which we elected. As a result of the adoption of
Page 9
ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, we recorded both operating lease right-of-use ('ROU') assets of $2,210 and lease liabilities of $2,210. The adoption of ASC 842 had an immaterial impact on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three-month period ended March 31, 2019. In addition, we elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard which allowed us to carry forward the historical lease classification. There was no cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings required.
Additional information and disclosures required by this new standard are contained in Note 17, 'Leases'.
Effect of Newly Issued but Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards:
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), which changes the impairment model for most financial assets. This ASU is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations. The underlying premise of ASU 2016-13 is that financial assets measured at amortized cost should be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The allowance for credit losses should reflect management’s current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the remaining life of a financial asset. The income statement will be effected for the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Management is in the process of evaluating the impact adoption of this update will have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. This process has engaged multiple areas of the Company in evaluating loss estimation methods and application of these methods to specific segments of the loan portfolio. Management has been actively monitoring FASB developments and evaluating the use of different methods allowed. Due to continuing development of our methodology, additional time is required to quantify the affect this ASU will have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Management plans on running parallel calculations during the year and finalizing a method or methods of adoption in time for the effective date.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the FASB eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill under Step 2, an entity had to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, under the amendments in this Update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. A public business entity that is a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filer, such as the Company, should adopt the amendments in this Update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework – Changes the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurements. The Update removes the requirement to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level I and Level II of the fair value hierarchy; the policy for timing of transfers between levels; and the valuation processes for Level III fair value measurements. The Update requires disclosure of changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income (loss) for recurring Level III fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level III fair value measurements. This Update is effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Page 10
In October, 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-17, Consolidation (Topic 810), which made improvements in 1) applying the variable interest entity (VIE) guidance to private companies under common control and 2) considering indirect interests held through related parties under common control for determining whether fees paid to decision makers and service providers are variable interests. Under the amendments in this Update, a private company may elect not to apply VIE guidance to legal entities under common control (including common control leasing arrangements) if both the parent and the legal entity being evaluated for consolidation are not public business entities. In addition, indirect interests held through related parties in common control arrangements should be considered on a proportional basis for determining whether fees paid to decision makers and service providers are variable interests. For entities other than private companies, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In November, 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-18, Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808), which made the following targeted improvements to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for collaborative arrangements: (1) clarified that certain transactions between collaborative arrangement participants should be accounted for as revenue under Topic 606 when the collaborative arrangement participant is a customer in the context of a unit of account, (2) add unit-of-account guidance in Topic 808 to align with the guidance in Topic 606 (that is, a distinct good or service) when an entity is assessing whether the collaborative arrangement or a part of the arrangement is within the scope of Topic 606, and (3) require that in a transaction with a collaborative arrangement participant that is not directly related to sales to third parties, presenting the transaction together with revenue recognized under Topic 606 is precluded if the collaborative arrangement participant is not a customer. For public business entities, such as the Company, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments, which affects a variety of topics in the Codification and applies to all reporting entities within the scope of the affected accounting guidance. Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses amendments are effective for SEC registrants for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Topic 825, Financial Instruments amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of Topic 326 amendments on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The amendments to Topic 825 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, Topic 326, which allows entities to irrevocably elect the fair value option for certain financial assets previously measured at amortized cost upon adoption of the new credit losses standard. To be eligible for the transition election, the existing financial asset must otherwise be both within the scope of the new credit losses standard and eligible for the applying the fair value option in ASC 825-10.3. The election must be applied on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is not available for either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity debt securities. For entities that elect the fair value option, the difference between the carrying amount and the fair value of the financial asset would be recognized through a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings as of the date an entity adopted ASU 2016-13. Changes in fair value of that financial asset would subsequently be reported in current earnings. For entities that have not yet adopted ASU 2016-13, the effective dates and transition requirements are the same as those in ASU 2016-13. For entities that have adopted ASU 2016-13, ASU 2019-05 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted once ASU 2016-13 has been adopted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Page 11
(3) Securities
The amortized cost and fair market value of available for sale securities and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized were as follows:
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Losses
Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
government agencies
21,779
221
(22
21,978
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
180,496
11,245
(6
191,735
Mortgage-backed securities in government sponsored
entities
141,788
4,153
(181
145,760
Total debt securities
344,063
15,619
(209
30,623
202
(140
30,685
168,993
3,680
172,071
143,707
1,024
(1,193
143,538
343,323
4,906
(1,935
The amortized cost and fair value of securities at June 30, 2019, by contractual maturity, is shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed securities are shown separately.
Available for sale
Fair
Value
Due in one year or less
10,871
10,851
Due after one year through five years
16,215
16,516
Due after five years through ten years
21,705
23,070
Due after ten years
153,484
163,276
Mortgage-backed securities
Total securities available for sale
Proceeds from sales of securities, gross realized gains and gross realized losses were as follows:
Sale proceeds
Gross realized gains
47
Gross realized losses
43
Gains from securities called or settled by the issuer
Securities were pledged to secure public deposits, other deposits and liabilities as required by law. The carrying value of pledged securities was approximately $136,488 and $114,145 as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
Page 12
Securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 not recognized in income are as follows:
12 Months or less
More than 12 months
Description of Securities
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies
3,549
2,882
Mortgage-backed securities in gov’t sponsored
25,086
Total temporarily impaired
31,517
16,469
8,008
(71
25,890
(531
33,898
6,630
(90
40,333
(1,103
46,963
14,638
(161
82,692
(1,774
97,330
At June 30, 2019, there were thirty-eight securities in the portfolio with unrealized losses mainly due to higher current market rates when compared to the time of purchase. Unrealized losses on securities have not been recognized into income because the issuers’ securities are of high credit quality, management has the intent and ability to hold these securities for the foreseeable future, and the decline in fair value is largely due to market yields increasing. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date or reset date. The Company does not intend to sell until recovery and does not believe selling will be required before recovery.
The following table presents the net gains and losses on equity investments recognized in earnings for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, and the portion of unrealized gains and losses for the period that relates to equity investments held at June 30, 2019 and 2018:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Net gains (losses) recognized on equity securities during the
period
Less: Net gains (losses) realized on the sale of equity securities
during the period
Unrealized gains (losses) recognized in equity securities held at
reporting date
Page 13
(4) Loans
Loan balances were as follows:
Commercial & Agriculture
186,423
177,101
Commercial Real Estate- Owner Occupied
218,183
210,121
Commercial Real Estate- Non-Owner Occupied
530,570
523,598
Residential Real Estate
466,581
457,850
Real Estate Construction
144,448
135,195
Farm Real Estate
36,116
38,513
Consumer and Other
16,449
19,563
Total loans
1,598,770
1,561,941
Allowance for loan losses
(13,786
(13,679
Net loans
Included in total loans above are net deferred loan fees of $259 and $389 at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
(5) Allowance for Loan Losses
Management has an established methodology for determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses that assesses the risks and losses inherent in the loan portfolio. For purposes of determining the allowance for loan and lease losses, the Company has segmented certain loans in the portfolio by product type. Loss migration rates for each risk category are calculated and used as the basis for calculating loan loss allowance allocations. Loss migration rates are calculated over a three-year period for all portfolio segments. Management also considers certain economic factors for trends that management uses to account for the qualitative and environmental changes in risk, which affects the level of the reserve.
The following economic factors are analyzed:
•
Changes in lending policies and procedures
Changes in experience and depth of lending and management staff
Changes in quality of credit review system
Changes in nature and volume of the loan portfolio
Changes in past due, classified and nonaccrual loans and TDRs
Changes in economic and business conditions
Changes in competition or legal and regulatory requirements
Changes in concentrations within the loan portfolio
Changes in the underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans
The total allowance reflects management’s estimate of loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The Company considers the allowance for loan losses of $13,786 adequate to cover loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio, at June 30, 2019. The following tables present, by portfolio segment, the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.
Page 14
Allowance for loan losses:
For the three months ended June 30, 2019
Beginning balance
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Provision
Ending Balance
1,834
(27
18
1,828
Commercial Real Estate:
Owner Occupied
1,979
17
13
2,009
Non-Owner Occupied
5,989
30
(152
5,867
1,434
(105
37
332
1,698
971
1,135
366
1
(2
365
251
(24
32
(58
201
Unallocated
998
(315
683
13,822
(156
120
13,786
For the three months ended June 30, 2019, the allowance for Commercial Real Estate – Non-Owner Occupied loans decreased due to a decrease in general reserves required as a result of a decrease in loan balances and loss rates. This was represented as a decrease in the provision. The allowance for Residential Real Estate loans increased due to an increase in general reserves required for this type as a result of an increase in loan balances and loss rates, represented by an increase in the provision. The allowance for Real Estate Construction loans increased due to an increase in general reserves required as a result of an increase in loan balances. The allowance for Consumer and Other loans was reduced by a decrease in loss rates and recoveries on previously charged off amounts. The result was represented as a decrease in the provision. Management feels that the unallocated amount is appropriate and within the relevant range for the allowance that is reflective of the risk in the portfolio at June 30, 2019.
For the three months ended June 30, 2018
(123
309
1,630
2,030
121
2,161
5,670
(1
(541
5,135
1,750
(40
(54
1,691
820
41
861
411
(3
410
247
29
86
300
527
152
679
12,814
(226
279
12,867
For the three months ended June 30, 2018, the allowance for Commercial & Agriculture loans increased due to an increase in general reserves required for this type as a result of higher loan balances. The result was represented as an increase in the provision. The allowance for Commercial Real Estate – Owner Occupied loans increased due to an increase in general reserves required for this type as a result of higher loan balances. The allowance for Commercial Real Estate – Non-Owner Occupied loans was reduced by a decrease in general reserves required for this type as a result of lower loss rates. The allowance for Residential Real Estate loans was reduced by a decrease in general reserves required for this type as a result of a decrease in loss rates, represented by a decrease in the provision. The allowance for Farm Real Estate loans was reduced by a decrease in general reserves required for this type as a result of lower outstanding loan balances. The result was represented as a decrease in the provision.
Page 15
For the six months ended June 30, 2019
1,747
104
1,962
239
(132
5,803
44
20
1,531
(203
162
1,046
113
397
(34
284
(81
(53
909
13,679
(395
502
For the six months ended June 30, 2019, the allowance for Commercial & Agriculture loans increased due to an increase in general reserves required for this type as a result of higher loan balances, offset by a decrease in the loss rates. The result was represented as an increase in the provision. The allowance for Commercial Real Estate –Owner Occupied loans increased due to an increase in general reserves required as a result of higher loan balances, offset by net recoveries on previously charged off amounts, resulting in a decrease in the provision. The allowance for Commercial Real Estate – Non-Owner Occupied loans increased due to an increase in general reserves required as a result of higher loan balances, offset by a decrease in the loss rates. This was represented as an increase in the provision. The allowance for Residential Real Estate loans increased due to an increase in general reserves required for this type as a result of an increase in loan balances and loss rates, represented by an increase in the provision. The allowance for Real Estate Construction loans increased due to an increase in general reserves required as a result of higher loan balances. The allowance for Farm Real Estate loans was reduced by a decrease in general reserves required for this type as a result of lower outstanding loan balances. The result was represented as a decrease in the provision. The allowance for Consumer and Other loans decreased due to a decrease in the general reserves required for the type as a result of a decrease in loan balances and loss rates. The result was represented as a decrease in the provision. Management feels that the unallocated amount is appropriate and within the relevant range for the allowance that is reflective of the risk in the portfolio at June 30, 2019.
For the six months ended June 30, 2018
1,562
(248
212
2,043
(193
130
181
5,307
(45
21
(148
1,910
93
(250
834
27
430
(23
290
(103
33
80
758
(79
13,134
384
For the six months ended June 30, 2018, the allowance for Commercial & Agriculture loans increased due to an increase in general reserves required for this type as a result of higher loan balances. The result was represented as an increase in the provision. The allowance for Commercial Real Estate – Owner Occupied loans increased due to an increase in general reserves required for this type as a result of higher loan balances. The allowance for Commercial Real Estate – Non-Owner Occupied loans was reduced by a decrease in general reserves required for this type as a result of lower loss rates. The allowance for Residential Real Estate loans was reduced by a decrease in general reserves required for this type as a result of a decrease in loss rates, represented by a decrease in the provision. The allowance for Farm Real Estate loans was reduced by a decrease in general reserves required for this type as a result of lower outstanding loan balances. The result was represented as a decrease in the provision.
Page 16
The following tables present, by portfolio segment, the allocation of the allowance for loan losses and related loan balances as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
Loans acquired
with credit
deterioration
Loans individually
evaluated for
impairment
Loans collectively
1,999
97
1,601
107
Outstanding loan balances:
186,027
459
217,724
379
530,191
559
1,126
464,896
682
35,434
3,013
1,595,169
12
1,950
8
122
1,401
390
141
13,530
176,693
484
209,637
31
523,567
883
1,279
455,688
696
37,817
2,857
1,558,160
Page 17
The following tables present credit exposures by internally assigned risk grades as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The risk rating analysis estimates the capability of the borrower to repay the contractual obligations of the loan agreements as scheduled or at all. The Company’s internal credit risk grading system is based on experiences with similarly graded loans.
The Company’s internally assigned risk grades are as follows:
Pass – loans which are protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the value of the underlying collateral.
Special Mention – loans where a potential weakness or risk exists, which could cause a more serious problem if not corrected.
Substandard – loans that have a well-defined weakness based on objective evidence and are characterized by the distinct possibility that Civista will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Doubtful – loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard asset. In addition, these weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, based on existing circumstances.
Loss – loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible, or of such value that continuance as an asset is not warranted.
Generally, Residential Real Estate, Real Estate Construction and Consumer and Other loans are not risk-graded, except when collateral is used for a business purpose. Only those loans that have been risk rated are included below.
Pass
Special Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
181,688
2,049
2,686
208,914
3,916
5,353
527,609
2,297
664
71,137
387
6,087
77,611
135,222
135,232
32,092
872
3,152
1,037
1,045
1,157,699
9,521
17,960
1,185,180
173,783
1,509
1,809
201,228
3,512
5,381
520,487
2,023
1,088
70,908
580
7,363
78,851
124,769
124,823
32,908
3,096
2,509
1,713
1,733
1,125,796
10,733
18,211
1,154,740
Page 18
The following tables present performing and nonperforming loans based solely on payment activity for the periods ended June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 that have not been assigned an internal risk grade. The types of loans presented here are not assigned a risk grade unless there is evidence of a problem. Payment activity is reviewed by management on a monthly basis to evaluate performance. Loans are considered to be nonperforming when they become 90 days past due or if management determines that we may not collect all of our principal and interest. Nonperforming loans also include certain loans that have been modified in Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDRs) where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced or are expected to experience financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from the Company’s loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions due to economic status. Certain TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructure and may only be returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally six months.
Residential
Real Estate
Construction
Consumer
and Other
Performing
388,970
9,216
15,404
413,590
Nonperforming
378,999
10,372
17,830
407,201
The following tables include an aging analysis of the recorded investment of past due loans outstanding as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
30-59
Days
Past Due
60-89
90 Days
or Greater
Total Past
Due
Current
Purchased
Credit-
Impaired
Loans
Total Loans
and
Accruing
244
635
185,759
402
249
529
1,180
217,003
250
259
530,311
551
733
1,191
2,475
463,547
145
11
156
35,960
57
79
16,370
1,558
1,835
4,784
1,593,398
225
92
317
176,743
547
413
564
1,524
208,597
288
950
522,648
7,118
677
806
8,601
448,366
39
135,156
158
191
38,322
117
183
19,380
8,328
1,449
2,028
11,805
1,549,212
Page 19
The following table presents loans on nonaccrual status, excluding purchased credit-impaired (PCI) loans, as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
205
270
1,112
942
3,482
3,886
308
5,131
5,869
Nonaccrual Loans: Loans are considered for nonaccrual status upon reaching 90 days delinquency, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection, although the Company may be receiving partial payments of interest and partial repayments of principal on such loans. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, previously accrued but unpaid interest is deducted from interest income. Payments received on nonaccrual loans are applied to the unpaid principal balance. A loan may be returned to accruing status only if one of three conditions are met: the loan is well-secured and none of the principal and interest has been past due for a minimum of 90 days; the loan is a TDR and has made a minimum of six months payments; or the principal and interest payments are reasonably assured and a sustained period of performance has occurred, generally six months.
Modifications: A modification of a loan constitutes a TDR when the Company for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. The Company offers various types of concessions when modifying a loan, however, forgiveness of principal is rarely granted. Commercial Real Estate loans modified in a TDR often involve reducing the interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk. Residential Real Estate loans modified in a TDR primarily involve interest rate reductions where monthly payments are lowered to accommodate the borrowers’ financial needs.
Loans modified in a TDR are typically already on non-accrual status and partial charge-offs have in some cases already been taken against the outstanding loan balance. As a result, loans modified in a TDR may have the financial effect of increasing the specific allowance associated with the loan. An allowance for impaired loans that have been modified in a TDR are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral, less any selling costs, if the loan is collateral dependent. Management exercises significant judgment in developing these estimates. As of June 30, 2019, TDRs accounted for $107 of the allowance for loan losses. As of December 31, 2018, TDRs accounted for $143 of the allowance for loan losses.
Loan modifications that are considered TDRs completed during the six-months ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 were as follows. There were no loans modified in a TDR during the three-months ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018:
For the Six-Month Period Ended
Number of
Contracts
Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
Post-
Commercial Real Estate—Owner Occupied
Commercial Real Estate—Non-Owner Occupied
382
Total Loan Modifications
Page 20
June 30, 2018
591
Recidivism, or the borrower defaulting on its obligation pursuant to a modified loan, results in the loan once again becoming a non-accrual loan. Recidivism occurs at a notably higher rate than do defaults on new origination loans, so modified loans present a higher risk of loss than do new origination loans.
During both the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, there were no defaults on loans that were modified and considered TDRs during the respective previous twelve months.
Impaired Loans: Larger (greater than $350) Commercial & Agricultural and Commercial Real Estate loan relationships, all TDRs and Residential Real Estate and Consumer loans that are part of a larger relationship are tested for impairment on a quarterly basis. These loans are analyzed to determine if it is probable that all amounts will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. If management determines that the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance.
Page 21
The following table includes the recorded investment and unpaid principal balances for impaired loans, excluding PCI loans, with the associated allowance amount, if applicable, as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Related
Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
179
193
876
948
1,017
1,089
256
2,483
2,555
1,864
1,939
With an allowance recorded:
280
291
254
262
265
440
530
534
993
996
Total:
1,202
1,354
3,089
2,935
The following table includes the average recorded investment and interest income recognized for impaired financing receivables for the three-and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.
For the three months ended
Average
Recognized
465
524
381
1,137
15
1,321
687
785
3,037
3,664
For the six months ended
808
472
686
264
42
1,184
1,334
690
726
2,977
84
3,596
82
Page 22
Changes in the amortizable yield for PCI loans were as follows, since acquisition:
For the
Three-Month
Period Ended
(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
326
Acquisition of PCI loans
Accretion
(67
Balance at end of period
For the Six-Month
336
(77
(9
The following table presents additional information regarding loans acquired and accounted for in accordance with ASC 310-30:
At June 30, 2019
At December 31, 2018
Acquired Loans with
Specific Evidence of
Deterioration of Credit
Quality (ASC 310-30)
Outstanding balance
1,357
1,805
Carrying amount
There has been $0 and $8 in allowance for loan losses recorded for acquired loans with or without specific evidence of deterioration in credit quality as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
Foreclosed Assets Held For Sale
Foreclosed assets acquired in settlement of loans are carried at fair value less estimated costs to sell and are included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, foreclosed assets included in other assets totaled $0. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had initiated formal foreclosure procedures on $531 and $311, respectively, of consumer residential mortgages.
Page 23
(6) Other Comprehensive Income
The following table presents the changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax.
For the Three-Month Period Ended
June 30, 2019(a)
June 30, 2018(a)
Gains and
Losses on
Available-for-
Sale
Securities
Defined
Benefit
Pension
Items
7,200
(3,683
368
(4,196
Other comprehensive income (loss) before
reclassifications
4,984
(536
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss
(8
108
(5
Net current-period other comprehensive income
(loss)
4,976
Ending balance
12,176
(3,567
(173
(4,083
(a)
Amounts in parentheses indicate debits on the consolidated balance sheets.
The following table presents the amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Amount Reclassified from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss) (a)
Details about Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss
Components
For the Three
months ended
Affected Line Item in the
Statement Where Net Income is
Presented
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities
Net gain on securities
available for sale
Net of tax
Amortization of defined benefit pension items
Actuarial gains/(losses) (b)
(147
(143
(116
(113
Total reclassifications for the period
(108
Amounts in parentheses indicate expenses/losses and other amounts indicate income/benefit.
(b)
These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost.
Page 24
2,347
(3,799
3,185
(4,309
9,840
(3,075
(11
232
226
9,829
(3,080
Reclassification of equity securities from
accumulated other comprehensive loss
Amounts in parentheses indicate debits on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
For the Six
(294
(286
62
60
(232
(221
(7) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
There has been no change in the carrying amount of goodwill of $76,851 for the periods ended June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Goodwill is not amortized and, instead, management performs an evaluation of goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Management last performed an evaluation of the Company’s goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2018 and concluded that the Company’s goodwill was not impaired at December 31, 2018.
Page 25
Acquired intangible assets, other than goodwill, as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Carrying
Amortization
Net
Amortized intangible assets(1):
MSRs
2,183
541
1,642
2,110
446
1,664
Core deposit intangibles
14,792
7,579
7,213
7,104
7,688
Total amortized intangible assets
16,975
8,120
16,902
7,550
(1)
Excludes fully amortized intangible assets
Aggregate core deposit intangible amortization expense was $235, $26, $475 and $59 for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Aggregate mortgage servicing rights amortization was $56, $27, $95 and $43 for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
Core deposit
intangibles
470
514
2020
88
913
1,001
2021
87
891
978
2022
868
956
2023
841
927
Thereafter
1,249
3,230
4,479
(8) Short-Term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings, which consist of federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings are included in Federal Home Loan Bank advances on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are summarized as follows:
Federal Funds
Short-term
Borrowings
Maximum indebtedness
192,700
20,000
225,300
Average balance
102,108
113,520
Average rate paid
2.51
%
2.58
2.07
Interest rate on balance
2.46
2.45
Average balance during the period represents daily averages. Average rate paid represents interest expense divided by the related average balances.
These borrowing transactions can range from overnight to six months in maturity. The average maturity was one day at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are used to facilitate the needs of our customers as well as to facilitate our short-term funding needs. Securities sold under repurchase agreements are carried at the amount of cash received in association with the agreement. We continuously monitor the collateral levels and may be required, from time to time, to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. Securities pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements are maintained with our safekeeping agents.
Page 26
The following table presents detail regarding the securities pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. All of the repurchase agreements are overnight agreements.
Securities pledged for repurchase agreements:
U.S. Treasury securities
615
Obligations of U.S. government agencies
14,939
21,338
Total securities pledged
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for repurchase
agreements
Amounts related to agreements not included in offsetting
disclosures above
(9) Earnings per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share are computed as net income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect, if any, of additional potential common shares issuable under the Company’s equity incentive plan, computed using the treasury stock method, and the impact of the Company’s convertible preferred shares using the “if converted” method.
Basic
Net income available to common shareholders—basic
Weighted average common shares
outstanding—basic
15,628,537
10,470,839
15,618,154
10,342,763
Basic earnings per common share
Diluted
Net income available to common
shareholders—diluted
Weighted average common shares outstanding
for basic earnings per common share
Add: Dilutive effects of convertible preferred
shares
1,294,175
2,144,497
2,263,652
Average shares and dilutive potential common
shares outstanding—diluted
16,922,712
12,615,336
16,912,329
12,606,415
Diluted earnings per common share
For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, there were 1,294,175 and 2,144,497, respectively, of average dilutive shares related to the Company’s convertible preferred shares. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, there were 1,294,175 and 2,263,652, respectively, of average dilutive shares related to the Company’s convertible preferred shares. Under the “if converted” method, all convertible preferred shares are assumed to be converted into common shares at the corresponding conversion rate. These additional shares are then added to the common shares outstanding to calculate diluted earnings per share.
Page 27
(10) Commitments, Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Risk
Some financial instruments, such as loan commitments, credit lines, letters of credit and overdraft protection, are issued to meet customers’ financing needs. These are agreements to provide credit or to support the credit of others, as long as the conditions established in the contract are met, and usually have expiration dates. Commitments may expire without being used. Off-balance-sheet risk of credit loss exists up to the face amount of these instruments, although material losses are not anticipated. The same credit policies are used to make such commitments as are used for loans, including obtaining collateral at exercise of commitment. The contractual amounts of financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk were as follows for June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
Contract Amount
Fixed Rate
Variable
Rate
Commitment to extend credit:
Lines of credit and construction loans
13,010
380,344
14,984
359,220
Overdraft protection
46,993
37,201
Letters of credit
624
926
850
13,638
428,263
15,611
397,271
Commitments to make loans are generally made for a period of one year or less. Fixed rate loan commitments included in the table above had interest rates ranging from 4.83% to 8.50% at June 30, 2019 and from 2.88% to 8.50% at December 31, 2018, respectively. Maturities extend up to 30 years.
Civista is required to maintain certain reserve balances on hand in accordance with the Federal Reserve Board requirements. The reserve balance maintained in accordance with such requirements was $11,261 on June 30, 2019 and $8,891 on December 31, 2018.
(11) Pension Information
The Company sponsors a pension plan which is a noncontributory defined benefit retirement plan. Annual payments, subject to the maximum amount deductible for federal income tax purposes, are made to a pension trust fund. In 2006, the Company amended the pension plan to provide that no employee could be added as a participant to the pension plan after December 31, 2006. In 2014, the Company amended the pension plan again to provide that no additional benefits would accrue beyond April 30, 2014.
Net periodic pension benefit was as follows:
Service cost
Interest cost
128
125
Expected return on plan assets
(256
(273
(512
(546
Other components
Net periodic pension benefit (cost)
19
38
(10
The Company does not expect to make any contribution to its pension plan in 2019. The Company made no contribution to its pension plan in 2018.
(12) Equity Incentive Plan
At the Company’s 2014 annual meeting, the shareholders adopted the Company’s 2014 Incentive Plan (“2014 Incentive Plan”). The 2014 Incentive Plan authorizes the Company to grant options, stock awards, stock units and other awards for up to 375,000 common shares of the Company. There were 240,001 shares available for future grants under this plan at June 30, 2019.
No options had been granted under the 2014 Incentive Plan as of June 30, 2019 and 2018.
Page 28
Each year, the Board of Directors has awarded restricted common shares to senior officers of the Company. The restricted shares vest ratably over a three-year period following the grant date. The product of the number of restricted shares granted and the grant date market price of the Company’s common shares determines the fair value of restricted shares awarded under the Company’s 2014 Incentive Plan. Management recognizes compensation expense for the fair value of restricted shares on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
On May 17, 2018, directors of the Company’s banking subsidiary, Civista, were paid a retainer in the form of non-restricted common shares of the Company. The aggregate of 6,204 common shares were issued to Civista directors as payment of their retainer for their service on the Civista Board of Directors covering the period up to the 2019 Annual Meeting. This issuance was expensed in its entirety when the shares were issued in the amount of $144.
On September 25, 2018, newly appointed directors of the Company’s banking subsidiary, Civista, were paid a retainer in the form of non-restricted common shares of the Company. The aggregate of 867 common shares were issued for their service on the Civista Board of Directors covering the period up to the 2019 Annual Meeting. This issuance was expensed in its entirety when the shares were issued in the amount of $21.
Finally, on May 21, 2019, directors of the Company’s banking subsidiary, Civista, were paid a retainer in the form of non-restricted common shares of the Company. The aggregate of 8,946 common shares were issued to Civista directors as payment of their retainer for their service on the Civista Board of Directors covering the period up to the 2020 Annual Meeting. This issuance was expensed in its entirety when the shares were issued in the amount of $196.
The Company classifies share-based compensation for employees with “Compensation expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following is a summary of the Company’s outstanding restricted shares and changes therein for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019:
Restricted
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Nonvested at beginning of period
44,027
20.48
39,970
19.10
Granted
21,106
20.65
Vested
(16,557
17.31
Forfeited
(492
22.41
Nonvested at end of period
The following is a summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding restricted shares as of June 30, 2019:
Date of Award
Remaining Expense
Remaining Vesting Period (Years)
January 15, 2016
1.50
March 20, 2017
3,725
25
0.50
3,581
61
2.50
April 10, 2018
5,282
73
6,225
3.50
March 14, 2019
10,188
175
10,918
182
4.50
655
2.75
During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recorded $178 of share-based compensation expense and $196 of director retainer fees for shares granted under the 2014 Incentive Plan. At June 30, 2019, the total compensation cost related to unvested awards not yet recognized is $655, which is expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining life of the grants of 2.75 years.
Page 29
(13) Fair Value Measurement
The Company uses a fair value hierarchy to measure fair value. This hierarchy describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1: Quoted prices for identical assets in active markets that are identifiable on the measurement date; Level 2: Significant other observable inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets, quoted prices in markets that are not active and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data; Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s own view about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset.
Debt securities: The fair values of securities available for sale are determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).
Equity securities: The Company has two types of equity securities, one is not actively traded in an open market, while the other is listed on an exchange and is less frequently traded. The fair value of the equity security available for sale not actively traded in an open market is determined by using market data inputs for similar securities that are observable (Level 2 inputs). The fair value of the other equity security is determined from third-party pricing services or a computerized pricing model and classified Level 2.
The fair value of the swap asset/liability: The fair value of the swap asset and liability is based on an external derivative model using data inputs based on similar transactions as of the valuation date and classified Level 2. The changes in fair value of these assets/liabilities had no impact on net income or comprehensive income.
Impaired loans: The Company has measured impairment on impaired loans generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the properties. In some cases, management may adjust the appraised value due to the age of the appraisal, changes in market conditions, or observable deterioration of the property since the appraisal was completed. Additionally, management makes estimates about expected costs to sell the property which are also included in the net realizable value. If the fair value of the collateral dependent loan is less than the carrying amount of the loan, a specific reserve for the loan is made in the allowance for loan losses or a charge-off is taken to reduce the loan to the fair value of the collateral (less estimated selling costs) and the loan is included as a Level 3 measurement. If the fair value of the collateral exceeds the carrying amount of the loan, then the loan is not included in the table below as it is not currently being carried at its fair value. The fair values in the table below exclude estimated selling costs of $13 as of June 30, 2019.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are summarized in the table below.
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2019 Using:
Assets:
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Government agencies
Swap asset
8,598
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Swap liability
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired loans
Page 30
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018 Using:
Mortgage-backed securities in government
sponsored entities
2,837
Liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis:
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
1,803
The following table presents quantitative information about the Level 3 significant unobservable inputs for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2019.
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Valuation Technique
Unobservable Input
Range
Weighted Average
Appraisal of collateral
Appraisal adjustments
10% - 30%
26%
The following table presents quantitative information about the Level 3 significant unobservable inputs for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2018.
0% - 30%
Liquidation expense
0% - 10%
8%
Holding period
0 - 30 months
21 months
Page 31
The carrying amount and fair values of financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2019 are as follows:
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Financial Assets:
Loans, held for sale
Loans, net of allowance
1,585,020
Financial Liabilities:
Nonmaturing deposits
1,364,451
Time deposits
268,269
269,293
Short-term FHLB advances
Long-term FHLB advances
57,345
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase
35,798
Accrued interest payable
The carrying amount and fair values of financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2018 are as follows:
1,517,278
1,312,207
267,686
267,943
4,983
34,620
230
Page 32
(14) Derivative Hedging Instruments
To accommodate customer need and to support the Company’s asset/liability positioning, on occasion we enter into interest rate swaps with a customer and a bank counterparty. The Company enters into a floating rate loan and a fixed rate swap with our customer. Simultaneously, the Company enters into an offsetting fixed rate swap with a bank counterparty. In connection with each swap transaction, the Company agrees to pay interest to the customer on a notional amount at a variable interest rate and receive interest from the customer on the same notional amount at a fixed interest rate. At the same time, the Company agrees to pay a bank counterparty the same fixed interest rate on the same notional amount and receive the same variable interest rate on the same notional amount. These transactions allow the Company’s customer to effectively convert variable rate loans to fixed rate loans. Since the Company acts as an intermediary for its customer, changes in the fair value of the underlying derivative contracts offset each other and do not significantly impact the Company’s results of operations.
The following table summarizes the Company’s interest rate swap positions and the impact of a 1 basis point change in interest rates as of June 30, 2019.
Notional
Average Rate
Received/(Paid)
Impact of a
1 basis point change
in interest rates
Repricing
Frequency
Derivative Assets
130,429
5.18
Monthly
Derivative Liabilities
(130,429
-5.18
(80
Net Exposure
The following table summarizes the Company’s interest rate swap positions and the impact of a 1 basis point change in interest rates as of December 31, 2018.
120,131
5.19
72
(120,131
-5.19
(72
The Company monitors and controls all derivative products with a comprehensive Board of Director approved commercial loan swap policy. All hedge transactions must be approved in advance by the Lenders Loan Committee or the Directors Loan Committee of the Board of Directors.
(15) Qualified Affordable Housing Project Investments
The Company invests in certain qualified affordable housing projects. At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the balance of the investment for qualified affordable housing projects was $4,802 and $4,276, respectively. These balances are reflected in the other assets line on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The unfunded commitments related to the investments in qualified affordable housing projects totaled $4,173 and $4,922 at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
During the six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized amortization expense with respect to its investments in qualified affordable housing projects of $266 and $258, respectively, offset by tax credits and other benefits from its investment in affordable housing tax credits of $552 and $426, respectively. During the three-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized amortization expense with respect to its investments in qualified affordable housing projects of $133 and $129, respectively, offset by tax credits and other benefits from its investment in affordable housing tax credits of $276 and $207, respectively. During the three- and six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company did not incur impairment losses related to its investment in qualified affordable housing projects.
Page 33
(16) Revenue Recognition
The Company accounts for revenues from contracts with customers under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Revenue associated with financial instruments, including revenue from loans and securities are outside the scope of the new standard and accounted for under other existing GAAP. In addition, certain noninterest income streams such as fees associated with mortgage servicing rights, financial guarantees, derivatives, and certain credit card fees are also not in scope of the new guidance. Noninterest revenue streams in-scope of ASC 606 are discussed below.
Service Charges
Service charges consist of account analysis fees (i.e., net fees earned on analyzed business and public checking accounts), monthly service fees, and other deposit account related fees. The Company’s performance obligation for account analysis fees and monthly service fees is generally satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, over the period in which the service is provided. Other deposit account related fees are largely transactional based, and therefore, the Company’s performance obligation is satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a point in time. Payment for service charges on deposit accounts is primarily received immediately or in the following month through a direct charge to customers’ accounts.
ATM/Interchange Fees
Fees, exchange, and other service charges are primarily comprised of debit and credit card income, ATM fees and other service charges. Debit and credit card income is primarily comprised of interchange fees earned whenever the Company’s debit and credit cards are processed through card payment networks such as Mastercard. ATM fees are primarily generated when a Company cardholder uses a non-Company ATM or a non-Company cardholder uses a Company ATM. The Company’s performance obligation for fees, exchange, and other service charges are largely satisfied, and related revenue recognized, when the services are rendered or upon completion. Payment is typically received immediately or in the following month.
Wealth Management Fees
Wealth management fees are primarily comprised of fees earned from the management and administration of trusts and other customer assets. The Company’s performance obligation is generally satisfied over time and the resulting fees are recognized monthly, based upon the month-end market value of the assets under management and the applicable fee rate. Payment is generally received in the following month through a direct charge to customers’ accounts. The Company does not earn performance-based incentives. The Company’s performance obligation for these transactional-based services is generally satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a point in time (i.e., as incurred). Payment is received shortly after services are rendered.
Tax Refund Processing Fees
The Company facilitates the payment of federal and state income tax refunds in partnership with a third-party vendor. Refund Transfers (“RTs”) are fee-based products whereby a tax refund is issued to the taxpayer after the Company has received the refund from the federal or state government. As part of this agreement the Company earns fee income, the majority of which is received in the first quarter of the year. The Company’s fee income revenue is recognized based on the estimated percent of business completed by each date.
Other noninterest income consists of other recurring revenue streams such as check order fees, wire transfer fees, safety deposit box rental fees, item processing fees and other miscellaneous revenue streams. Check order income mainly represents fees charged to customers for checks. Wire transfer fees represent revenue from processing wire transfers. Safe deposit box rental fees are charged to the customer on an annual basis and recognized upon receipt of payment. The Company determined that since rentals and renewals occur fairly consistently over time, revenue is recognized on a basis consistent with the duration of the performance obligation. Item processing fee income represents fees charged to other financial institutions for processing their transactions. Payment is typically received in the following month.
Page 34
The following presents noninterest income, segregated by revenue streams in-scope and out-of-scope of Topic 606, for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.
Noninterest Income
In-scope of Topic 606:
228
396
448
Noninterest Income (in-scope of Topic 606)
4,229
3,561
9,769
8,521
Noninterest Income (out-of-scope of Topic 606)
875
829
1,619
1,485
Total Noninterest Income
Contract Balances
A contract asset balance occurs when an entity performs a service for a customer before the customer pays consideration (resulting in a contract receivable) or before payment is due (resulting in a contract asset). A contract liability balance is an entity’s obligation to transfer a service to a customer for which the entity has already received payment (or payment is due) from the customer. The Company’s noninterest revenue streams are largely based on transactional activity, or standard month-end revenue accruals such as asset management fees based on month-end market values. Consideration is often received immediately or shortly after the Company satisfies its performance obligation and revenue is recognized. The Company does not typically enter into long-term revenue contracts with customers, and therefore, does not experience significant contract balances. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company did not have any significant contract balances.
Contract Acquisition Costs
In connection with the adoption of Topic 606, an entity is required to capitalize, and subsequently amortize into expense, certain incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if these costs are expected to be recovered. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are those costs that an entity incurs to obtain a contract with a customer that it would not have incurred if the contract had not been obtained (for example, sales commission). The Company utilizes the practical expedient which allows entities to immediately expense contract acquisition costs when the asset that would have resulted from capitalizing these costs would have been amortized in one year or less. Upon adoption of Topic 606, the Company did not capitalize any contract acquisition cost.
(17) Leases
We have operating leases for several branch locations and office space. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. We also lease certain office equipment under operating leases. Many of our leases include both lease (e.g., minimum rent payments) and non-lease components (e.g., common-area or other maintenance costs). The Company accounts for each component separately based on the standalone price of each component. In addition, we have several operating leases with lease term of less than one year and therefore, we have elected the practical expedient to exclude these short-term leases from our ROU assets and lease liabilities.
Most leases include one or more options to renew. The exercise of lease renewal options is typically at our sole discretion. The majority of renewals to extend the lease terms are included in our ROU assets and lease liabilities as they are reasonably certain of exercise.
As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use the fully collateralized FHLB borrowing rate, commensurate with the lease terms based on the information available at the lease commencement date in determining the present value of the lease payments.
Page 35
The balance sheet information related to our operating leases were as follows as of June 30, 2019:
Classification on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet
Operating lease
Total lease assets
Liabilities:
Total lease liabilities
The cost components of our operating leases were as follows for the period ended June 30, 2019:
Lease cost
Operating lease cost
100
195
Short-term lease cost
Sublease income
Total lease cost
311
Maturities of our lease liabilities for all operating leases for each of the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
209
408
394
334
327
1,105
Total lease payments
2,777
Less: Imputed Interest
325
Present value of lease liabilities
The weighted average remaining lease terms and discount rates for all of our operating leases were as follows as of June 30, 2019:
Weighted-average remaining lease term-operating leases (years)
6.80
Weighted-average discount rate-operating leases
3.11
Page 36
ITEM 2.
Introduction
The following discussion focuses on the consolidated financial condition of the Company at June 30, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018, and the consolidated results of operations for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019, compared to the same periods in 2018. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included in this Form 10-Q.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), relating to such matters as the Company’s financial condition, anticipated operating results, cash flows, business line results, credit quality expectations, prospects for new lines of business, economic trends (including interest rates) and similar matters. Forward-looking statements reflect our expectations, estimates or projections concerning future results or events. These statements are generally identified by the use of forward-looking words or phrases such as “believe,” “belief,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “may,” “could,” “intend,” “intent,” “estimate,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will,” “should” or other similar words or phrases. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance and are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict and could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, changes in financial markets or national or local economic conditions; sustained weakness or deterioration in the real estate market; volatility and direction of market interest rates; credit risks of lending activities; changes in the allowance for loan losses; legislation or regulatory changes or actions; increases in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance premiums and assessments; changes in tax laws; failure of or breach in our information and data processing systems; unforeseen litigation; and other risks identified from time-to-time in the Company’s other public documents on file with the SEC, including those risks identified in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of Part I of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims, any obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements, except as required by law.
Financial Condition
Total assets of the Company at June 30, 2019 were $2,202,995 compared to $2,138,954 at December 31, 2018, an increase of $64,041, or 3.0%. The increase in total assets was due to increases in cash and due from financial institutions, securities available for sale and loans of $7,060, $13,179 and $36,722, accompanied by other increases in loans held for sale, bank owned life insurance and other assets. Total liabilities at June 30, 2019 were $1,878,783 compared to $1,840,056 at December 31, 2018, an increase of $38,727, or 2.1%. The increase in total liabilities was primarily attributable to an increase in total deposits, mainly due to our participation in the tax refund processing program and accrued expenses and other liabilities, partially offset by decreases in FHLB advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
Loans outstanding as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were as follows:
$ Change
% Change
9,322
5.3
8,062
3.8
6,972
1.3
8,731
1.9
9,253
6.8
(2,397
-6.2
(3,114
-15.9
36,829
-3.0
(107
0.8
36,722
2.4
Net loans have increased $36,722 or 2.4% since December 31, 2018. The Commercial & Agriculture, Commercial Real Estate – Owner Occupied, Commercial Real Estate – Non-Owner Occupied, Residential Real Estate and Real Estate Construction loan portfolios increased $9,322, $8,062, $6,972, $8,731 and $9,253, respectively since December 31, 2018, while the Farm Real Estate and Consumer and Other loan portfolios decreased $2,397 and $3,114, respectively since December 31, 2018. At June 30, 2019, the net loan to deposit ratio was 97.1% compared to 98.0% at December 31, 2018.
Page 37
During the first six months of 2019 and 2018, there were no provisions made to the allowance for loan losses from earnings. Net recoveries for the first six months of 2019 totaled $107, compared to net charge offs of $267 in the first six months of 2018. For the first six months of 2019, the Company charged off a total of 22 loans. Two Commercial & Agriculture loans totaling $27, eight Real Estate Mortgage loans totaling $203, one Commercial Real Estate – Owner Occupied loan totaling $60, one Real Estate Construction loan totaling $24 and ten Consumer and Other loans totaling $81 were charged off in the first six months of the year. In addition, during the first six months of 2019, the Company had recoveries on previously charged-off Commercial and Agriculture loans of $4, Commercial Real Estate – Owner Occupied loans of $239, Commercial Real Estate – Non-Owner Occupied loans of $44, Real Estate Mortgage loans of $162, Farm Real Estate loans of $2 and Consumer and Other loans of $51. For each loan category, as well as in total, the percentage of net charge-offs to loans was less than one percent. Nonperforming loans decreased by $738 since December 31, 2018, which was due to a decrease in loans on nonaccrual status of $738. Each of these factors was considered by management as part of the examination of both the level and mix of the allowance by loan type as well as the overall level of the allowance.
Management specifically evaluates loans that are impaired for estimates of loss. To evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to cover probable losses in the portfolio, management considers specific reserve allocations for identified portfolio loans, reserves for delinquencies and historical reserve allocations. Loss migration rates are calculated over a three-year period for all portfolio segments. Management also considers certain economic factors for trends that management uses to account for the qualitative and environmental changes in risk, which affects the level of the reserve.
Management analyzes each impaired Commercial and Commercial Real Estate loan relationship with a balance of $350 or larger, on an individual basis and designates a loan as impaired when it is in nonaccrual status or when an analysis of the borrower’s operating results and financial condition indicates that underlying cash flows are not adequate to meet its debt service requirements. Loans held for sale are excluded from consideration as impaired. Loans are generally moved to nonaccrual status when 90 days or more past due. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged-off when deemed uncollectible. The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans was 0.86% at June 30, 2019 and 0.88% December 31, 2018.
The available for sale security portfolio increased by $13,179, from $346,294 at December 31, 2018 to $359,473 at June 30, 2019. Management continually evaluates our securities portfolio in response to established asset/liability management objectives, changing market conditions that could affect profitability and the level of interest rate risk to which the Company is exposed. These evaluations may cause the Company to change the level of funds it deploys into investment securities and change the composition of its investment securities portfolio. As of June 30, 2019, the Company was in compliance with all pledging requirements.
Premises and equipment, net, decreased $301 from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019. The decrease is the result of new purchases of $651, offset by depreciation of $952.
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) increased $1,454 from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019. The Company purchased additional policies totaling $955 during the first quarter of 2019. The remaining difference is the result of increases in the cash surrender value of the underlying insurance policies.
Other assets increased $5,397 from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019. The increase is the result of increases in the market value of swap assets and right-of-use (ROU) assets, offset by a decrease in net deferred tax assets. We adopted ASU 2016-02, effective January 1, 2019, which requires the recognition of lease assets for those leases classified as operating leases. At June 30, 2019, the ROU assets totaled $2,452.
Total deposits as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were as follows:
Noninterest-bearing demand
28,458
6.1
Interest-bearing demand
305,086
261,996
43,090
16.4
Savings and money market
562,823
582,128
(19,305
-3.3
268,270
584
0.2
Total Deposits
3.3
Page 38
Total deposits at June 30, 2019 increased $52,827 from year-end 2018. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $28,458 from year-end 2018, while interest-bearing deposits, including savings and time deposits, increased $24,369 from December 31, 2018. The increase in noninterest-bearing deposits was primarily due to increases in cash balances related to the Company’s participation in a tax refund processing program, which added noninterest-bearing deposits of $29,498. This increase is temporary as transactions are processed and is expected to return to levels more consistent with December 31, 2018 over the next two quarters. The year-to-date average balance of total deposits increased $452,424 compared to the average balance for the same period in 2018 mainly due to the United Community Bancorp (“UCB”) acquisition in the third quarter of 2018.
FHLB advances decreased $17,300 from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019. The decrease is due to a decrease in overnight funds of $67,300, offset by an increase in long term advances of $50,000. On May 23, 2019, the Company advanced $50,000 from the FHLB. The advance has terms of one hundred twenty months, puttable after sixty-months with a fixed rate of 2.05%. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which tend to fluctuate, have decreased $6,645 from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019.
Accrued expenses and other liabilities increased $9,845 from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019. The increase is primarily the result of increases in lease liabilities of $2,452, swap liabilities of $5,761 and a recorded liability of $2,102 for security purchases to be settled.
Shareholders’ equity at June 30, 2019 was $324,212, or 14.7% of total assets, compared to $298,898, or 14.0% of total assets, at December 31, 2018. The increase was the result of net income of $18,330, a decrease in the Company’s pension liability, net of tax, of $232, and an increase in the fair value of securities available for sale, net of tax, of $9,829, partially offset by dividends on preferred shares and common shares of $328 and $3,123, respectively. Total outstanding common shares at June 30, 2019 were 15,633,059, which increased from 15,603,499 common shares outstanding at December 31, 2018. Common shares outstanding increased as a result of the grant of 21,106 restricted common shares to certain officers under the Company’s 2014 Incentive Plan. In addition, 8,946 common shares were issued to Civista directors as a retainer payment for service on the Civista Board of Directors.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
The Company had net income of $8,661 for the three months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $5,647 from net income of $3,014 for the same three months of 2018. Basic earnings per common share were $0.54 for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, compared to $0.26 for the same period in 2018. Diluted earnings per common share were $0.51 for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, compared to $0.24 for the same period in 2018. The primary reasons for the changes in net income are explained below.
Net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was $21,742, an increase of $6,976 from $14,766 in the same three months of 2018. This increase is the result of an increase of $8,766 in total interest income with only an increase of $1,790 in interest expense. Interest-earning assets averaged $1,986,841 during the three months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $558,888 from $1,427,953 for the same period of 2018. The Company’s average interest-bearing liabilities increased from $905,722 during the three months ended June 30, 2018 to $1,316,104 during the three months ended June 30, 2019, largely due to the UCB acquisition in the third quarter of 2018. The Company’s fully tax equivalent net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was 4.49% and 4.21%, respectively.
Total interest income was $24,926 for the three months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $8,766 from $16,160 of total interest income for the same period in 2018. The increase in interest income is attributable to an increase of $7,513 in interest and fees on loans, which resulted from an increase in the average balance of loans, accompanied by a higher yield on the portfolio. The average balance of loans increased by $424,577 or 36.6% to $1,583,533 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to $1,158,956 for the same period in 2018. The loan yield increased to 5.49% for 2019, from 4.90% in 2018. The net increase in interest and fees earned on loans attributable to the UCB acquisition was $3,681 for the three months ended June 30, 2019.
Interest on taxable securities increased $654 to $1,694 for the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to $1,040 for the same period in 2018. The average balance of taxable securities increased $57,560 to $202,995 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to $145,435 for the same period in 2018. The yield on taxable securities increased 54 basis points to 3.39% for 2019, compared to 2.85% for 2018. Interest on tax-exempt securities increased $522 to $1,408 for the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to $886 for the same period in 2018. The average balance of tax-exempt securities increased $69,138 to $171,004 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to $101,866 for the same period in 2018. The yield on tax-exempt securities decreased 7 basis points to 4.39% for 2019, compared to 4.46% for 2018.
Page 39
Interest expense increased $1,790 or 128.4% to $3,184 for the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared with $1,394 for the same period in 2018. The change in interest expense can be attributed to an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities and rate. For the three months ended June 30, 2019, the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased $410,382 to $1,316,104, as compared to $905,722 for the same period in 2018. Interest incurred on deposits increased by $1,406 to $1,976 for the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to $570 for the same period in 2018. The change in deposit expense was due to an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits of $373,675 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018. In addition, the rate paid on demand and savings accounts increased from 0.16% in 2018 to 0.34% in 2019 and the rate paid on time deposits increased from 0.91% to 1.86% in 2019. Interest expense incurred on FHLB advances and subordinated debentures increased 46.7% from 2018. The increase was due to a $34,811 increase in average balance from 2018 and a 40 basis point increase in rate from 2018. The UCB acquisition resulted in a net increase of interest expense of $840 for the three months ended June 30, 2019.
The following table presents the condensed average balance sheets for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. The daily average loan amounts outstanding are net of unearned income and include loans held for sale and nonaccrual loans. The average balance of securities is computed using the carrying value of securities. Rates are annualized and taxable equivalent yields are computed using a 21% tax rate for tax-exempt interest income. The average yield has been computed using the historical amortized cost average balance for available-for-sale securities.
balance
Yield/
rate*
Interest-earning assets:
1,583,533
5.49
1,158,956
4.90
202,995
3.39
145,435
2.85
171,004
4.39
101,866
4.46
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks
29,309
2.29
21,696
1.66
Total interest-earning assets
1,986,841
5.14
1,427,953
4.60
Noninterest-earning assets:
38,558
36,501
21,819
17,549
7,324
5,270
Intangible assets
85,865
28,351
22,193
12,781
44,328
25,317
Less allowance for loan losses
(13,884
(12,935
Total Assets
2,193,044
1,540,787
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand and savings
858,781
721
0.34
615,667
0.16
Time
271,183
1,255
1.86
140,622
FHLB
138,271
2.41
103,460
1.87
5.07
4.61
Repurchase Agreements
18,442
0.11
16,546
0.10
Total interest-bearing liabilities
1,316,104
0.97
905,722
0.62
Noninterest-bearing deposits
540,283
434,126
Other liabilities
21,219
12,609
Shareholders’ Equity
315,438
188,330
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Net interest income and interest rate spread
4.17
3.98
Net interest margin
4.49
4.21
*—All yields and costs are presented on an annualized basis
Page 40
Net interest income may also be analyzed by comparing the volume and rate components of interest income and interest expense. The following table provides an analysis of the changes in interest income and expense between the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. The table is presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis.
Increase (decrease) due to:
Volume (1)
Rate (1)
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest income:
5,652
1,861
7,513
429
654
536
(14
522
40
77
Total interest income
6,654
2,112
8,766
Interest expense:
127
344
471
442
493
935
187
349
Repurchase agreements
756
1,034
1,790
5,898
1,078
6,976
The change in interest income and interest expense due to changes in both volume and rate, which cannot be segregated, has been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.
The Company provides for loan losses through regular provisions to the allowance for loan losses. During the quarters ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, no provision for loan losses was provided. Management’s analysis of the provision for the quarters ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, indicated that no provision was required.
Noninterest income for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
Three months ended June 30,
14.2
66.7
(68
-194.3
81
17.1
61.7
9.0
75.0
0.0
(42
-10.6
714
16.3
Noninterest income for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was $5,104, an increase of $714 or 16.3% from $4,390 for the same period of 2018. The increase was primary due to increases in service charge fees of $193, net gain on sale of loans of $81, ATM/Interchange fees of $363 and bank owned life insurance of $108.
The increases in service charge fee income, ATM/Interchange fees and bank owned life insurance income is primarily attributable to the Company’s acquisition of UCB during the third quarter of 2018. Net gain on sale of loans increased primarily as a result of an increase in the average loan balance of loans sold.
Additionally, the Company processes state and federal income tax refund payments for customers of third-party income tax preparation vendors for which we receive a fee for processing the refund payments. Tax refund processing fees were $550
Page 41
during the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. This fee income is seasonal in nature, the majority of which is earned in the first quarter of the year.
Noninterest expense for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
2,163
29.3
102
11.8
48.1
(2,292
-83.7
-8.6
136
37.5
(783
-52.8
803.8
162.5
14.7
645
30.7
711
4.5
Noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was $16,639, an increase of $711, or 4.5%, from $15,928 reported for the same period of 2018. The primary reasons for the increase were increases in compensation expenses of $2,163, net occupancy expense of $102, equipment expense of $156, state franchise taxes of $136, amortization expense of $209, ATM expense of $338 and other operating expenses of $645, offset by decreases in contracted data processing expenses of $2,292 and professional services costs of $783.
The increase in compensation expense is mainly due to being a larger company as a result of the acquisition of UCB. The quarter-to-date average full time equivalent (FTE) employees were 436.1 at June 30, 2019, an increase of 88.8 FTEs over 2018. In addition, the increase can be attributed to payroll and payroll related expenses due to annual pay increases and increases in commission based costs and employee insurance costs. The increases in net occupancy expense, equipment expense, amortization expense, ATM expense and other operating expenses are primarily due to being a larger company as a result of the acquisition of UCB. The quarter-over-quarter increase in state franchise taxes was attributable to an increase in equity capital, which is the basis of the Ohio Financial Institutions tax. The decrease in contracted data processing expenses and professional services costs is due to expenses paid during the second quarter of 2018 related to the acquisition of UCB.
Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2019 totaled $1,546, up $1,332 compared to the same period in 2018. The effective tax rates for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were 15.2% and 6.6%, respectively. The difference between the statutory federal income tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate is the permanent tax differences, primarily consisting of tax-exempt interest income from municipal investments and loans, low income housing tax credits and bank owned life insurance income. The increase in the effective tax rate is due to higher taxable income for the three-months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 and 2018
The Company had net income of $18,330 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $8,327 from net income of $10,003 for the same six months of 2018. Basic earnings per common share were $1.15 for the period ended June 30, 2019, compared to $0.91 for the same period in 2018. Diluted earnings per common share were $1.08 for the period ended June 30, 2019, compared to $0.79 for the same period in 2018. The primary reasons for the changes in net income are explained below.
Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $43,460, an increase of $13,922 from $29,538 in the same six months of 2018. This increase is the result of an increase of $17,426 in total interest income with only an increase of $3,504 in interest expense. Interest-earning assets averaged $2,002,099 during the six months ended June 30, 2019, an increase of $536,859 from $1,465,240 for the same period of 2018. The Company’s average interest-bearing liabilities increased from $898,439 in 2018 to $1,295,697 in 2019, largely due to the UCB acquisition in the third quarter of 2018. The Company’s fully tax equivalent net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was 4.47% and 4.13%, respectively.
Page 42
Total interest income increased $17,426 to $49,510 for the period ended June 30, 2019, which is attributable to an increase of $14,836 in interest and fees on loans. This change was the result of an increase in the average balance of loans, accompanied by a higher yield on the portfolio. The average balance of loans increased by $420,694 or 36.5% to $1,573,924 for the period ended June 30, 2019, as compared to $1,153,230 for the period ended June 30, 2018. The loan yield increased to 5.46% for 2019, from 4.86% in 2018. The net increase in interest and fees earned on loans attributable to the UCB acquisition was $7,185 for the period ended June 30, 2019.
Interest on taxable securities increased $1,416 to $3,442 for the period ended June 30, 2019, compared to $2,026 for the same period in 2018. The average balance of taxable securities increased $62,056 to $205,285 for the period ended June 30, 2019 as compared to $143,229 for the period ended June 30, 2018. The yield on taxable securities increased 57 basis points to 3.41% for 2019, compared to 2.84% for 2018. Interest on tax-exempt securities increased $996 to $2,760 for the period ended June 30, 2019, compared to $1,764 for the same period in 2018. The average balance of tax-exempt securities increased $62,676 to $164,349 for the period ended June 30, 2019 as compared to $101,673 for the period ended June 30, 2018. The yield on tax-exempt securities decreased 5 basis points to 4.44% for 2019, compared to 4.49% for 2018.
Interest expense increased $3,504 or 137.6% to $6,050 for the period ended June 30, 2019, compared with $2,546 for the same period in 2018. The change in interest expense can be attributed to an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities and rate. For the period ended June 30, 2019, the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased $397,258 to $1,295,697, as compared to $898,439 for the period ended June 30, 2018. Interest incurred on deposits increased by $2,590 to $3,867 for the period ended June 30, 2019, compared to $1,277 for the same period in 2018. The change in deposit expense was due to an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits of $348,261 for the period ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018. In addition, the rate paid on demand and savings accounts increased from 0.16% in 2018 to 0.34% in 2019 and the rate paid on time deposits increased from 0.95% to 1.82% in 2019. Interest expense incurred on FHLB advances and subordinated debentures increased 72.5% from 2018. The increase was due to a $46,155 increase in average balance from 2018 and a 46 basis point increase in rate from 2018. The UCB acquisition resulted in a net increase of interest expense of $1,632 for the period ended June 30, 2019.
Page 43
The following table presents the condensed average balance sheets for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. The daily average loan amounts outstanding are net of unearned income and include loans held for sale and nonaccrual loans. The average balance of securities is computed using the carrying value of securities. Rates are annualized and taxable equivalent yields are computed using a 21% tax rate for tax-exempt interest income. The average yield has been computed using the historical amortized cost average balance for available-for-sale securities.
1,573,924
5.46
1,153,230
4.86
205,285
3.41
143,229
2.84
164,349
4.44
101,673
58,541
2.37
67,108
1.54
2,002,099
5.08
1,465,240
4.48
65,567
64,211
21,872
17,641
6,931
4,860
85,990
28,359
22,394
12,968
43,987
25,247
(13,885
(13,037
2,234,955
1,605,489
857,232
615,940
270,847
2,438
1.82
163,878
775
0.95
FHLB advance
117,882
2.44
71,727
1.78
5.10
4.29
20,309
17,467
1,295,697
0.94
898,439
0.57
610,265
506,002
20,408
14,656
308,585
186,392
4.14
3.91
4.47
4.13
Page 44
Net interest income may also be analyzed by comparing the volume and rate components of interest income and interest expense. The following table provides an analysis of the changes in interest income and expense between the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. The table is presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis.
11,073
3,763
14,836
953
463
1,416
(21
178
12,971
4,455
17,426
253
674
965
1,663
504
795
118
1,456
2,048
3,504
11,515
2,407
13,922
The Company provides for loan losses through regular provisions to the allowance for loan losses. During the periods ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, no provision for loan losses was provided. The Company has experienced low net charge offs, improved asset quality and strengthened problem loan coverage ratios, which led to management’s decision that no provision was required for the periods ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018.
Noninterest income for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
Six months ended June 30,
515
20.7
133.3
(106
-141.3
9.8
715
62.6
70
4.1
213
74.5
(112
-14.8
1,382
13.8
Noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $11,388, an increase of $1,382 or 13.8% from $10,006 for the same period of 2018. The increase was primary due to increases in service charge fees of $515, net gain on sale of loans of $79, ATM/Interchange fees of $715 and bank owned life insurance of $213 which was offset by a decrease in other income of $112.
The increases in service charge fee income, ATM/Interchange fees and bank owned life insurance income is primarily attributable to the Company’s acquisition of UCB during the third quarter of 2018. Net gain on sale of loans increased primarily as a result of an increase in the average loan balance of loans sold. Other income decreased primarily as a result of lower swap fee income.
Page 45
Additionally, the Company processes state and federal income tax refund payments for customers of third-party income tax preparation vendors for which we receive a fee for processing the refund payments. Tax refund processing fees were $2,750 during the period ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. This fee income is seasonal in nature, the majority of which is earned in the first quarter of the year.
Noninterest expense for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:
4,594
31.1
23.5
245
35.1
(2,221
-71.9
11.6
218
32.0
(640
-31.4
416
705.1
498
116.9
69
10.8
1,364
35.3
4,955
17.6
Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $33,088, an increase of $4,955, or 17.6%, from $28,133 reported for the same period of 2018. The primary reasons for the increase were increases in compensation expenses of $4,594, net occupancy expense of $381, equipment expense of $245, state franchise taxes of $218, amortization expense of $416, ATM expense of $498 and other operating expenses of $1,364, offset by decreases in contracted data processing expenses of $2,221 and professional services costs of $640.
The increase in compensation expense is mainly due to being a larger company as a result of the acquisition of UCB. Year-to-date average FTE employees were 433.3 at June 30, 2019, an increase of 88.3 FTE’s over 2018. In addition, the increase can be attributed to payroll and payroll related expenses due to annual pay increases and increases in commission based costs, stock-based compensation and employee insurance costs. The increases in net occupancy expense, equipment expense, amortization expense, ATM expense and other operating expenses are primarily due to being a larger company as a result of the acquisition of UCB. The year-over-year increase in state franchise taxes was attributable to an increase in equity capital, which is the basis of the Ohio Financial Institutions tax. The decrease in contracted data processing expenses and professional services costs is due to expenses paid during the second quarter of 2018 related to the acquisition of UCB.
Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2019 totaled $3,430, up $2,022 compared to the same period in 2018. The effective tax rates for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were 15.8% and 12.3%, respectively. The difference between the statutory federal income tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate is the permanent tax differences, primarily consisting of tax-exempt interest income from municipal investments and loans, low income housing tax credits and bank owned life insurance income. The increase in the effective tax rate is due to higher taxable income for the six-months ended June 30, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018.
Page 46
Capital Resources
Shareholders’ equity totaled $324,212 at June 30, 2019 compared to $298,898 at December 31, 2018. The increase in shareholders’ equity included net income of $18,330, a $232 net decrease in the Company’s pension liability and an increase in the fair value of securities available for sale, net of tax, of $9,829, which was partially offset by dividends on preferred stock and common stock of $328 and $3,123, respectively.
All of the Company’s capital ratios exceeded the regulatory minimum guidelines as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 as identified in the following table:
Total Risk
Based Capital
Tier I Risk
CET1 Risk
Leverage
Ratio
Company Ratios—June 30, 2019
16.8
15.9
13.6
12.4
Company Ratios—December 31, 2018
16.1
15.3
12.9
12.2
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
8.0
6.0
4.0
To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt
Corrective Action Provisions
10.0
6.5
5.0
Liquidity
The Company maintains a conservative liquidity position. All securities are classified as available for sale. Securities, with maturities of one year or less, totaled $10,851, or 3.0% of the total security portfolio at June 30, 2019. The available for sale portfolio helps to provide the Company with the ability to meet its funding needs. The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) contained in the consolidated financial statements detail the Company’s cash flows from operating activities resulting from net earnings.
As reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited), our cash flows are classified for financial reporting purposes as operating, investing or financing cash flows. Net cash provided by operating activities was $20,369 and $5,324 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. These amounts differ from net income due to a variety of cash receipts and disbursements that did not affect net income for the respective periods. Net cash used for investing activities was $38,740 and $20,676 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, principally reflecting our loan and investment security activities. Cash provided by and used for deposits and borrowings comprised most of our financing activities, which resulted in net cash provided by of $25,431 and $15,989 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Future loan demand of Civista may be funded by increases in deposit accounts, proceeds from payments on existing loans, the maturity of securities, and the sale of securities classified as available for sale. Additional sources of funds may also come from borrowing in the Federal Funds market and/or borrowing from the FHLB. Through its correspondent banks, Civista maintains federal funds borrowing lines totaling $42,500. As of June 30, 2019, Civista had total credit availability with the FHLB of $551,650 with standby letters of credit totaling $20,000 and a remaining borrowing capacity of approximately $355,350. In addition, Civista Bancshares, Inc. maintains a credit line totaling $10,000.
Page 47
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
ITEM 3.
The Company’s primary market risk exposure is interest-rate risk and, to a lesser extent, liquidity risk. All of the Company’s transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars with no specific foreign exchange exposure.
Interest-rate risk is the exposure of a banking organization’s financial condition to adverse movements in interest rates. Accepting this risk can be an important source of profitability and shareholder value. However, excessive levels of interest-rate risk can pose a significant threat to the Company’s earnings and capital base. Accordingly, effective risk management that maintains interest-rate risk at prudent levels is essential to the Company’s safety and soundness.
Evaluating a financial institution’s exposure to changes in interest rates includes assessing both the adequacy of the management process used to control interest-rate risk and the organization’s quantitative level of exposure. When assessing the interest-rate risk management process, the Company seeks to ensure that appropriate policies, procedures, management information systems and internal controls are in place to maintain interest-rate risk at prudent levels with consistency and continuity. Evaluating the quantitative level of interest rate risk exposure requires the Company to assess the existing and potential future effects of changes in interest rates on its consolidated financial condition, including capital adequacy, earnings, liquidity and, where appropriate, asset quality.
The Federal Reserve Board, together with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, adopted a Joint Agency Policy Statement on interest-rate risk, effective June 26, 1996. The policy statement provides guidance to examiners and bankers on sound practices for managing interest-rate risk, which will form the basis for ongoing evaluation of the adequacy of interest-rate risk management at supervised institutions. The policy statement also outlines fundamental elements of sound management that have been identified in prior Federal Reserve guidance and discusses the importance of these elements in the context of managing interest-rate risk. Specifically, the guidance emphasizes the need for active board of director and senior management oversight and a comprehensive risk-management process that effectively identifies, measures, and controls interest-rate risk.
Financial institutions derive their income primarily from the excess of interest collected over interest paid. The rates of interest an institution earns on its assets and owes on its liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Since market interest rates change over time, an institution is exposed to lower profit margins (or losses) if it cannot adapt to interest-rate changes. For example, assume that an institution’s assets carry intermediate- or long-term fixed rates and that those assets were funded with short-term liabilities. If market interest rates rise by the time the short-term liabilities must be refinanced, the increase in the institution’s interest expense on its liabilities may not be sufficiently offset if assets continue to earn at the long-term fixed rates. Accordingly, an institution’s profits could decrease on existing assets because the institution will have either lower net interest income or, possibly, net interest expense. Similar risks exist when assets are subject to contractual interest-rate ceilings, or rate sensitive assets are funded by longer-term, fixed-rate liabilities in a decreasing-rate environment.
Several techniques may be used by an institution to minimize interest-rate risk. One approach used by the Company is to periodically analyze its assets and liabilities and make future financing and investment decisions based on payment streams, interest rates, contractual maturities, and estimated sensitivity to actual or potential changes in market interest rates. Such activities fall under the broad definition of asset/liability management. The Company’s primary asset/liability management technique is the measurement of the Company’s asset/liability gap, that is, the difference between the cash flow amounts of interest sensitive assets and liabilities that will be refinanced (or repriced) during a given period. For example, if the asset amount to be repriced exceeds the corresponding liability amount for a certain day, month, year, or longer period, the institution is in an asset sensitive gap position. In this situation, net interest income would increase if market interest rates rose or decrease if market interest rates fell. If, alternatively, more liabilities than assets will reprice, the institution is in a liability sensitive position. Accordingly, net interest income would decline when rates rose and increase when rates fell. Also, these examples assume that interest rate changes for assets and liabilities are of the same magnitude, whereas actual interest rate changes generally differ in magnitude for assets and liabilities.
Several ways an institution can manage interest-rate risk include selling existing assets or repaying certain liabilities; matching repricing periods for new assets and liabilities, for example, by shortening terms of new loans or securities; and hedging existing assets, liabilities, or anticipated transactions. An institution might also invest in more complex financial instruments intended to hedge or otherwise change interest-rate risk. Interest rate swaps, futures contracts, options on futures, and other such derivative financial instruments often are used for this purpose. Because these instruments are sensitive to interest rate changes, they require management expertise to be effective. The Company has not purchased derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk in the past and does not currently intend to purchase such instruments in the near future. Financial institutions are also subject to prepayment risk in falling rate environments. For example, mortgage loans and other financial assets may be prepaid by a debtor
Page 48
so that the debtor may refinance its obligations at new, lower rates. Prepayments of assets carrying higher rates reduce the Company’s interest income and overall asset yields. A large portion of an institution’s liabilities may be short-term or due on demand, while most of its assets may be invested in long-term loans or securities. Accordingly, the Company seeks to have in place sources of cash to meet short-term demands. These funds can be obtained by increasing deposits, borrowing, or selling assets. FHLB advances and wholesale borrowings may also be used as important sources of liquidity for the Company.
The following table provides information about the Company’s financial instruments that were sensitive to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2018 and June 30, 2019, based on certain prepayment and account decay assumptions that management believes are reasonable. The table shows the changes in the Company’s net portfolio value (in amount and percent) that would result from hypothetical interest rate increases of 200 basis points and 100 basis points and an interest rate decrease of 100 basis points at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.
The Company had derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2018 and June 30, 2019. The changes in fair value of the assets and liabilities of the underlying contracts offset each other. Expected maturity date values for interest-bearing core deposits were calculated based on estimates of the period over which the deposits would be outstanding. The Company’s borrowings were tabulated by contractual maturity dates and without regard to any conversion or repricing dates.
Net Portfolio Value
Change in Rates
Dollar
Change
Percent
+200bp
442,718
46,599
417,572
29,451
+100bp
426,037
29,918
409,514
21,393
Base
396,119
388,121
-100bp
385,046
(11,073
-3
366,486
(21,393
-6
The change in net portfolio value from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019, can be attributed to a couple of factors. While the yield curve has fallen from the end of the year, both the volume and mix of assets and funding sources has changed. The volume of loans has increased, but the mix has shifted toward cash. Similarly, the volume of deposits has increased, while the mix has shifted away from borrowed money toward deposits. The balance change from the end of the year led to an increase in the base net portfolio value. Assets have shifted toward less volatile components while liabilities have shifted toward more volatile components. Combined, this led to a small increase in volatility. Beyond the change in the base level of net portfolio value, projected movements in rates, up or down, would also lead to changes in market values. The change in the rates up scenarios for both the 100 and 200 basis point movements would lead to a larger decrease in the market value of liabilities. Accordingly, we see a small increase in the net portfolio value. However, a downward change in rates would lead to a decrease in the net portfolio value as the market value of liabilities would increase more quickly than the market value of assets.
Page 49
ITEM 4.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive and our principal financial officers, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive and our principal financial officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2019, were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Page 50
Part II—Other Information
None
There were no material changes during the current period to the risk factors disclosed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of Part I of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable
Page 51
Exhibit
Description
Location
3.1
Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Civista Bancshares, Inc., as filed with the Ohio Secretary of State on November 15, 2018.
Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Civista Bancshares, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on November 16, 2018 and incorporated herein by reference. (File No. 001-36192)
3.2
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of Civista Bancshares, Inc. (adopted April 15, 2008)
Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Civista Bancshares, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2017, filed on November 8, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference. (File No. 001-36192)
Rule 13a-14(a)/15-d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
Included herewith
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15-d-14(a) Certification of Principal Accounting Officer.
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
Certification of Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101
The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) for the three- and six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) for the three- and six-months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018; (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018; (v) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018; and (vi) Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
Page 52
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
/s/ Dennis G. Shaffer
August 9, 2019
Dennis G. Shaffer
Date
President, Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Todd A. Michel
Todd A. Michel
Senior Vice President, Controller
Page 53