Cinemark Theatres - 10-Q quarterly report FY

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ

     As of April 30, 2009, 109,277,019 shares of common stock were outstanding.

Certain matters within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements included in this Form 10Q, other than statements of historical fact, may constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “expects,” “future” and “intends” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results or performance to differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. For a description of the risk factors, please review the “Risk Factors” section or other sections in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 13, 2009 and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by such risk factors. We undertake no obligation, other than as required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

     Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) are leaders in the motion picture exhibition industry in terms of both revenues and the number of screens in operation, with theatres in the United States (“U.S.”), Canada, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Peru, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama and Colombia. The Company also managed additional theatres in the U.S., Brazil, and Colombia during the three months ended March 31, 2009.

     The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, these interim financial statements reflect all adjustments of a recurring nature necessary to state fairly the financial position and results of operations as of, and for, the periods indicated. Majority-owned subsidiaries that the Company controls are consolidated while those subsidiaries of which the Company owns between 20% and 50% and does not control are accounted for as affiliates under the equity method. Those subsidiaries of which the Company owns less than 20% are generally accounted for as affiliates under the cost method, unless the Company is deemed to have the ability to exercise significant influence over the affiliate, in which case the Company would account for its investment under the equity method. The results of these subsidiaries and affiliates are included in the condensed consolidated financial statements effective with their formation or from their dates of acquisition. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

     These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited annual consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 13, 2009 by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be achieved for the full year.

     In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141(R), “Business Combinations”. This statement requires all business combinations completed after the effective date to be accounted for by applying the acquisition method (previously referred to as the purchase method); expands the definition of transactions and events that qualify as business combinations; requires that the acquired assets and liabilities, including contingencies, be recorded at the fair value determined on the acquisition date and changes thereafter reflected in income, not goodwill; changes the recognition timing for restructuring costs; and requires acquisition costs to be expensed as incurred rather than being capitalized as part of the cost of acquisition. Adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) was required for business combinations that occurred after December 15, 2008. Adoption of this statement did not have a significant impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

     In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements”. This statement establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest will no longer be shown as an expense item for all periods presented, but will be included in consolidated net income on the face of the income statement. SFAS No. 160 requires disclosure on the face of the consolidated income statement of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Upon adoption of this statement, the Company has recognized its noncontrolling interests as equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, has reflected net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated net income and has provided, in Note 4, a summary of changes in

equity attributable to noncontrolling interests, changes attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc. and changes in total equity.

     In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. This statement intends to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about their impact on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 requires disclosures regarding the objectives for using derivative instruments, the fair values of derivative instruments and their related gains and losses, and the accounting for derivatives and related hedged items. SFAS No. 161 was effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of SFAS No. 161 did not impact the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements, nor did it have a significant impact on the Company’s disclosures.

     In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force 03-6-1,“Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (“FSP-EITF 03-6-1”). Under FSP-EITF 03-6-1, unvested share based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP-EITF 03-6-1 was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years and requires retrospective application. The adoption of FSP-EITF 03-6-1 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s earnings per share calculations.

     In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 require that disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments be included in the notes to financial statements issued during interim periods. Fair value information must be presented in the notes to financial statements together with the carrying amounts of the financial instruments. It must be clearly stated whether the amounts are assets or liabilities and how they relate to information presented in the balance sheet. The disclosures must include methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair values, along with any changes in those methods and assumptions from prior periods. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of FSP FAS-107-1 and APB 28-1 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s disclosures.

     As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB Staff Position (“FSP”)  EITF 03-6-1,“Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities”. Under FSP-EITF 03-6-1, unvested share based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The adoption of FSP-EITF 03-6-1 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s earnings per share calculations.

     Basic earnings per share for the two classes of stock (common stock and unvested restricted stock) is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and unvested restricted stock outstanding during the reported period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares of common stock and unvested restricted stock plus the potentially dilutive effect of common equivalent shares outstanding determined under both the two class method and the treasury stock method. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, diluted earnings per share was the same under both the two class method and the treasury stock method. The following table presents computations of basic and diluted earnings per share under the two class method:

     Below is a summary of changes in equity attributable to Cinemark Holdings, Inc., noncontrolling interests and total equity for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:

     On February 13, 2009, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend for the fourth quarter of 2008 in the amount of $0.18 per share of common stock payable to stockholders of record on March 5, 2009. The dividend was paid on March 20, 2009 in the total amount of approximately $19,595.

     During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no increases or decreases to the Company’s additional paid in capital for purchases or sales of existing noncontrolling interests.

     On March 18, 2009, the Company acquired four theatres with 82 screens from Muvico Entertainment L.L.C. in an asset purchase for approximately $48,950 in cash. The acquisition results in an expansion of the Company’s U.S. theatre base, as three of the theatres are located in Florida and one theatre is located in Maryland. The Company incurred approximately $113 in transaction costs, which are reflected in general and administrative expenses on the condensed consolidated statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 2009.

     The transaction was accounted for by applying the acquisition method in accordance with SFAS No. 141(R) “Business Combinations”. The following table represents the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed that have been recognized by the Company in its condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2009:

     The amounts listed above are provisional and will be updated by the Company upon completion of the valuation analyses necessary to properly allocate the purchase price. The goodwill recorded is fully deductible for tax purposes.

     In March 2005, Regal Entertainment Inc. (“Regal”) and AMC Entertainment Inc. (“AMC”) formed National CineMedia, LLC, or NCM, and on July 15, 2005, the Company joined NCM, as one of the founding members. NCM operates the largest digital in-theatre network in the U.S. for providing cinema advertising and non-film events and combines the cinema advertising and non-film events businesses of the three largest motion picture exhibitors in the U.S. Upon joining NCM, the Company and NCM entered into an Exhibitor Services Agreement, pursuant to which NCM provides advertising, promotion and event services to the Company’s theatres.

     In consideration for NCM’s exclusive access to the Company’s theatre attendees for on-screen advertising and use of off-screen locations within the Company’s theatres for the lobby entertainment network and lobby promotions, the Company receives a monthly theatre access fee under the Exhibitor Services Agreement. The theatre access fee is composed of a fixed payment per patron, initially seven cents, and a fixed payment per digital screen, which may be adjusted for certain enumerated reasons. The payment per theatre patron will increase by 8% every five years, with the first such increase taking effect after the end of fiscal 2011, and the payment per digital screen, initially eight hundred dollars per digital screen per year, will increase annually by 5%, beginning after 2007. For 2009, the annual payment per digital screen is eight hundred eighty-two dollars. The theatre access fee paid in the aggregate to Regal, AMC and the Company will not be less than 12% of NCM’s Aggregate Advertising Revenue (as defined in the Exhibitor Services Agreement), or it will be adjusted upward to reach this minimum payment. Additionally, with respect to any on-screen advertising time provided to the Company’s beverage concessionaire, the Company is required to purchase such time from NCM at a negotiated rate. The Exhibitor Services Agreement has, except with respect to certain limited services, a term of 30 years.

     During March 2008, NCM performed a common unit adjustment calculation in accordance with the Common Unit Adjustment Agreement dated as of February 13, 2007 between NCM, Inc. and the Company, Regal and AMC. The common unit adjustment is based on the change in the number of screens operated by and attendance of the Company, AMC and Regal. As a result of the common unit adjustment calculation, the Company received an additional 846,303 common units of NCM, each of which is convertible into one share of NCM, Inc. common stock. The Company recorded the additional common units received at fair value as an investment with a corresponding adjustment to deferred revenue of $19,020. The common unit adjustment resulted in an increase in the Company’s ownership percentage in NCM from approximately 14.0% to approximately 14.5%. Subsequent to the annual common unit adjustment discussed above, in May 2008, Regal completed an acquisition of another theatre circuit that required an extraordinary common unit adjustment calculation by NCM in accordance with the Common Unit Adjustment Agreement. As a result of this extraordinary common unit adjustment, Regal was granted additional common units of NCM, which resulted in dilution of the Company’s ownership interest in NCM from 14.5% to 14.1%.

     During March 2009, NCM performed its annual common unit adjustment calculation under the Common Unit Adjustment Agreement. As a result of the calculation, the Company received an additional 1,197,303 common units of NCM, each of which is convertible into one share of NCM, Inc. common stock. The Company recorded the additional common units received at fair value as an investment with a corresponding adjustment to deferred revenue of $15,536. The common unit adjustment resulted in a change in the Company’s ownership percentage in NCM from approximately 14.1% to 15.0%. As of March 31, 2009, the Company owned a total of 15,188,955 common units of NCM.

     The Company accounts for its investment in NCM under the equity method of accounting due to its ability to exercise significant control over NCM. The Company has substantial rights as a founding member, including the right to designate a total of two nominees to the ten-member Board of Directors of NCM Inc., the sole manager.

     Below is a summary of activity with NCM as included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements:

     Below is summary financial information for NCM for the year ended January 1, 2009 (data for the three month period ended April 2, 2009 is not yet available):

     On February 12, 2007, the Company, AMC and Regal entered into a joint venture known as Digital Cinema Implementation Partners LLC (“DCIP”) to facilitate the implementation of digital cinema in the Company’s theatres and to establish agreements with major motion picture studios for the financing of digital cinema. Future digital cinema developments will be managed by DCIP, subject to the Company’s approval along with the Company’s partners, AMC and Regal. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has invested $5,500 and has a one-third ownership interest in DCIP. The Company is accounting for its investment in DCIP under the equity method of accounting.

     During the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, the Company recorded equity losses of $601 and $640, respectively, relating to this investment. The Company’s investment basis in DCIP was $1,017 and $377 at December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively, which is included in investments in and advances to affiliates on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

     During March 2008, the Company’s board of directors approved the Amended and Restated Cinemark Holdings, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Restated Incentive Plan”). The Restated Incentive Plan amends and restates the 2006 Plan, to (i) increase the number of shares reserved for issuance from 9,097,360 shares of common stock to 19,100,000 shares of common stock and (ii) permit the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”) to award participants restricted stock units and performance awards. The right of a participant to exercise or receive a grant of a restricted stock unit or performance award may be subject to the satisfaction of such performance or objective business criteria as determined by the Compensation Committee. With the exception of the changes identified in (i) and (ii) above, the Restated Incentive Plan does not materially differ from the 2006 Plan. The Restated Incentive Plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders at its annual meeting held on May 15, 2008.

     During August 2008, the Company filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-8 for the purpose of registering the additional shares available for issuance under the Restated Incentive Plan.

     Stock Options — A summary of stock option activity and related information for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is as follows:

     The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $29.

     During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company changed its estimated forfeiture rate of 5% to 2.5% based on actual cumulative stock option forfeitures. The cumulative impact of the reduction in forfeiture rate was $260 and was recorded as additional compensation expense during the three months ended March 31, 2009.

     The Company recorded compensation expense of $1,020, including the aforementioned $260 related to the change in forfeiture rate, and a tax benefit of approximately $385 during the three months ended March 31, 2009, related to the outstanding stock options. As of March 31, 2009, there was no remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding stock options and all outstanding options fully vested on April 2, 2009. All options outstanding at March 31, 2009 have an average remaining contractual life of approximately 5.5 years.

     Restricted Stock — During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company granted 406,335 shares of restricted stock to employees of the Company. The fair value of the shares of restricted stock was determined based on the market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant, which was $9.50 per share. The Company assumed a forfeiture rate of 5% for the restricted stock awards. The restricted stock vests over four years based on continued service by the employee.

     A summary of restricted stock activity for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is as follows:

     The Company recorded compensation expense of $442 related to restricted stock awards during the three months ended March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, the remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock awards was $7,198 and the weighted average period over which this remaining compensation expense will be recognized is approximately 3.5 years. Upon vesting, the Company receives a tax deduction. The recipients of restricted

stock are entitled to receive dividends and to vote their respective shares, however the sale and transfer of the restricted shares is prohibited during the restriction period.

     Restricted Stock Units — During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company granted restricted stock units representing 291,305 hypothetical shares of common stock under the Restated Incentive Plan. Similar to the restricted stock unit awards granted during 2008, the restricted stock units vest based on a combination of financial performance factors and continued service. The financial performance factors are based on an implied equity value concept that determines an internal rate of return (“IRR”) during the three fiscal year period ending December 31, 2011 based on a formula utilizing a multiple of Adjusted EBITDA subject to certain specified adjustments (as defined in the restricted stock unit award agreement). The financial performance factors for the restricted stock units have a threshold, target and maximum level of payment opportunity. If the IRR for the three year period is at least 8.5%, which is the threshold, one-third of the restricted stock units vest. If the IRR for the three year period is at least 10.5%, which is the target, two-thirds of the restricted stock units vest. If the IRR for the three year period is at least 12.5%, which is the maximum, 100% of the restricted stock units vest. All payouts of restricted stock units that vest will be subject to an additional service requirement and will be paid in the form of common stock if the participant continues to provide services through March 27, 2013, which is the fourth anniversary of the grant date. Restricted stock unit award participants are eligible to receive dividend equivalent payments if and at the time the restricted stock unit awards become vested.

     Below is a table summarizing the potential awards at each of the three levels of financial performance:

     Due to the fact that the IRR for the three year period ending December 31, 2011 cannot be determined at the time of grant, the Company has estimated that the most likely outcome is the achievement of the mid-point IRR level. As a result, the total compensation expense to be recorded for the restricted stock unit awards is $1,808 assuming a total of 190,324 units will vest at the end of the four year period. If during the service period, additional information becomes available to lead the Company to believe a different IRR level will be achieved for the three year period ending December 31, 2011, the Company will reassess the number of units that will vest and adjust its compensation expense accordingly on a prospective basis over the remaining service period.

     Below is a summary of outstanding restricted stock units:

     The Company recorded compensation expense of $116 related to all outstanding restricted stock unit awards during the three months ended March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, the remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock unit awards was $3,121 and the weighted average period over which the remaining compensation expense will be recognized is approximately 3.5 years.

     On March 20, 2008, in one open market purchase, the Company repurchased $10,000 aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 9 ³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $8,950. The Company funded the transaction with proceeds from the April 2007 initial public offering of its common stock. As a result of the transaction, the Company recorded a loss on early retirement of debt of $40 during the three months ended March 31, 2008, which primarily includes the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs partially offset by a discount on the repurchased senior discount notes.

     During 2007 and 2008, the Company entered into three interest rate swap agreements. The interest rate swap agreements qualify for cash flow hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The fair values of the interest rate swaps are recorded on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as an asset or liability with the effective portion of the interest rate swaps’ gains or losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and the ineffective portion reported in earnings. The Company’s fair value measurements are based on projected future interest rates as provided by the counterparties to the interest rate swap agreements and the fixed rates that the Company is obligated to pay under these agreements. Therefore, the Company’s measurements use significant unobservable inputs, which fall in Level 3 under SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements.”

     In March 2007, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements with effective dates of August 13, 2007 and terms of five years each. The interest rate swaps were designated to hedge approximately $500,000 of the Company’s variable rate debt obligations under its senior secured credit facility. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements, the Company pays fixed rates of 4.918% and 4.922% on $375,000 and $125,000, respectively, of variable rate debt and receives interest at a variable rate based on the 3-month LIBOR. The 3-month LIBOR rate on each reset date determines the variable portion of the interest rate swaps for the three-month period following the reset date. No premium or discount was incurred upon the Company entering into the interest rate swaps because the pay and receive rates on the interest rate swaps represented prevailing rates for each counterparty at the time the interest rate swaps were consummated. The Company estimates the fair values of the interest rate swaps by comparing estimated future interest payments to be made under forecasted future 3-month LIBOR to the fixed rates in accordance with the interest rate swaps.

     On September 14, 2008, the counterparty to the $375,000 interest rate swap agreement filed for bankruptcy protection. As a result, the Company determined that on September 15, 2008, when the counterparty’s credit rating was downgraded, the interest rate swap was no longer highly effective. On October 1, 2008, this interest rate swap was terminated by the Company. The change in fair value of this interest rate swap agreement from inception to September 14, 2008 was recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. The change in fair value from September 15, 2008 through September 30, 2008 and the gain on termination were recorded in earnings as a component of interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company determined that the forecasted transactions hedged by this interest rate swap are still probable to occur, thus the total amount reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to this swap of $18,147 is being amortized on a straight-line basis to interest expense over the period during which the forecasted transactions are expected to occur, which is September 15, 2008 through August 13, 2012. The Company amortized approximately $0 and $1,158 to interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The Company will amortize approximately $4,633 to interest expense over the next twelve months.

     On October 3, 2008, the Company entered into one interest rate swap agreement with an effective date of November 14, 2008 and a term of four years. The interest rate swap was designated to hedge approximately $100,000 of the Company’s variable rate debt obligations under its senior secured credit facility for three years and $75,000 of the

Company’s variable rate debt obligations under its senior secured credit facility for four years. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company pays a fixed rate of 3.63% on $175,000 of variable rate debt and receives interest at a variable rate based on the 1-monthLIBOR. The 1-month LIBOR rate on each reset date determines the variable portion of the interest rate swap for the one-month period following the reset date. No premium or discount was incurred upon the Company entering into the interest rate swap because the pay and receive rates on the interest rate swap represented prevailing rates for the counterparty at the time the interest rate swap was consummated.

     As of March 31, 2009, the fair values of the $125,000 interest rate swap and the $175,000 interest rate swap were liabilities of approximately $13,182 and $11,516, respectively which have been recorded as a component of other long-term liabilities. A corresponding cumulative amount of $15,213, net of taxes, has been recorded as an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2009. The interest rate swaps exhibited no ineffectiveness during the three months ended March 31, 2009.

     Below is a reconciliation of our interest rate swap values, as included in other long-term liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, from the beginning of the year to March 31, 2009:

     The Company’s goodwill was as follows:

     In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, the Company evaluates goodwill for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth quarter or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate, the carrying value of goodwill might exceed its estimated fair value.

     The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level and has allocated goodwill to the reporting unit based on an estimate of its relative fair value. The Company considers the reporting unit to be each of its sixteen regions in the U.S. and each of its eight countries internationally (Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama are considered one reporting unit). Goodwill impairment is evaluated using a two-step approach requiring the Company to compute the fair value of a reporting unit and compare it with its carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value, a second step is performed to measure the potential goodwill impairment. Fair value is determined based on a multiple of cash flows, which was six and a half times for the evaluation performed during the fourth quarter of 2008. These fair value estimates fall in Level 3 under SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements.” Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates are based on historical and projected operating performance as well as recent market transactions.

     Intangible assets consisted of the following:

     Aggregate amortization expense of $1,227 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 consisted of $1,225 of amortization of intangible assets and $2 of amortization of other assets. Estimated aggregate future amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows:

     In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment on a quarterly basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate, the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable.

     The Company considers actual theatre level cash flows, future years budgeted theatre level cash flows, theatre property and equipment carrying values, amortizing intangible assets carrying values, the age of a recently built theatre,

competitive theatres in the marketplace, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, the impact of recent ticket price changes, available lease renewal options and other factors considered relevant in its assessment of impairment of individual theatre assets. Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment indicators on an individual theatre basis, which the Company believes is the lowest applicable level for which there are identifiable cash flows. The impairment evaluation is based on the estimated undiscounted cash flows from continuing use through the remainder of the theatre’s useful life. The remainder of the useful life correlates with the available remaining lease period, which includes the probability of renewal periods for leased properties and a period of twenty years for fee owned properties. If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover a long-lived asset’s carrying value, the Company then compares the carrying value of the asset group (theatre) with its estimated fair value. Fair value is determined based on a multiple of cash flows, which was eight times for the evaluation performed during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and six and a half times for the evaluation performed during the three months ended March 31, 2009. When estimated fair value is determined to be lower than the carrying value of the asset group (theatre), the asset group (theatre) is written down to its estimated fair value. These fair value estimates fall in Level 3 under SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements.” The estimated aggregate fair value of the long-lived assets impaired during the three months ended March 31, 2009 was approximately $2,600. Significant judgment is involved in estimating cash flows and fair value. Management’s estimates are based on historical and projected operating performance as well as recent market transactions.

     The accumulated other comprehensive loss account in stockholders’ equity of $72,347 and $72,865 at December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009, respectively, includes the cumulative foreign currency adjustments from translating the financial statements of the Company’s international subsidiaries into U.S. dollars.

     In 2009 and 2008, all foreign countries where the Company has operations were deemed non-highly inflationary. Thus, any fluctuation in the currency results in a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss.

     On March 31, 2009, the exchange rate for the Brazilian real was 2.31 reais to the U.S. dollar (the exchange rate was 2.36 reais to the U.S. dollar at December 31, 2008). As a result, the effect of translating the March 31, 2009 Brazilian financial statements into U.S. dollars is reflected as a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to the accumulated other comprehensive loss account as an increase in stockholders’ equity of $2,841. At March 31, 2009, the total assets of the Company’s Brazilian subsidiaries were U.S. $174,810.

     On March 31, 2009, the exchange rate for the Mexican peso was 14.44 pesos to the U.S. dollar (the exchange rate was 13.78 pesos to the U.S. dollar at December 31, 2008). As a result, the effect of translating the March 31, 2009 Mexican financial statements into U.S. dollars is reflected as a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to the accumulated other comprehensive loss account as a decrease in stockholders’ equity of $4,295. At March 31, 2009, the total assets of the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries were U.S. $116,107.

     On March 31, 2009, the exchange rate for the Chilean peso was 586.36 pesos to the U.S. dollar (the exchange rate was 648.00 pesos to the U.S. dollar at December 31, 2008). As a result, the effect of translating the March 31, 2009 Chilean financial statements into U.S. dollars is reflected as a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to the accumulated other comprehensive loss account as an increase in stockholders’ equity of $1,435. At March 31, 2009, the total assets of the Company’s Chilean subsidiaries were U.S. $22,060.

     The effect of translating the March 31, 2009 financial statements of the Company’s other international subsidiaries,

with local currencies other than the U.S. dollar, is reflected as a cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment to the accumulated other comprehensive loss account as a decrease in stockholders’ equity of $1,709.

     SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company’s comprehensive income was as follows:

     The following is provided as supplemental information to the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows:

     The Company manages its international market and its U.S. market as separate reportable operating segments. The international segment consists of operations in Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Peru, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama and Colombia. The U.S. segment includes U.S. and Canada operations. Each segment’s revenue is derived from admissions and concession sales and other ancillary revenues, primarily screen advertising. The primary measure of segment profit and loss the Company uses to evaluate performance and allocate its resources is Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the reconciliation table below. The Company’s management evaluates the performance of its assets on a consolidated basis.

     Below is a breakdown of selected financial information by reportable operating segment:

     The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA:

     The Company has operations in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Peru, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama and Colombia, which are reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Below is a breakdown of selected financial information by geographic area:

     The Company leases one theatre from Plitt Plaza Joint Venture (“Plitt Plaza”) on a month-to-month basis. Plitt Plaza is indirectly owned by Lee Roy Mitchell, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, who owns approximately 12% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Annual rent is approximately $118 plus certain taxes, maintenance expenses and insurance. The Company recorded $30 and $32 of facility lease and other operating expenses payable to Plitt Plaza joint venture during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively.

     The Company manages one theatre for Laredo Theatre, Ltd. (“Laredo”). The Company is the sole general partner and owns 75% of the limited partnership interests of Laredo. Lone Star Theatres, Inc. owns the remaining 25% of the limited partnership interests in Laredo and is 100% owned by Mr. David Roberts, Lee Roy Mitchell’s son-in-law. Under the agreement, management fees are paid by Laredo to the Company at a rate of 5% of annual theatre revenues up to $50,000 and 3% of annual theatre revenues in excess of $50,000. The Company recorded $23 and $22 of management fee revenues during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively. All such amounts are included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements with the intercompany amounts eliminated in consolidation.

     The Company leases 22 theatres and two parking facilities from Syufy Enterprises, LP (“Syufy”) or affiliates of Syufy, which owns approximately 8% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Raymond Syufy is one of the Company’s directors and is an officer of the general partner of Syufy. Of these 24 leases, 20 have fixed minimum annual rent in an aggregate amount of approximately $21,646. The four leases without minimum annual rent have rent based upon a specified percentage of gross sales as defined in the lease with no minimum annual rent. For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, the Company paid approximately $292 and $308, respectively in percentage rent for these four leases.

     From time to time, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings arising from the ordinary course of its business operations, such as personal injury claims, employment matters, landlord-tenant disputes and contractual disputes, some of which are covered by insurance. The Company believes its potential liability with respect to proceedings currently pending is not material, individually or in the aggregate, to the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

     The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes and schedules included elsewhere in this report.

     We are one of the leaders in the motion picture exhibition industry, in terms of both revenues and the number of screens in operation, with theatres in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Peru, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama and Colombia. For financial reporting purposes at March 31, 2009, we have two reportable operating segments, our U.S. operations and our international operations.

     We generate revenues primarily from box office receipts and concession sales with additional revenues from screen advertising sales and other revenue streams, including ATM machines and electronic video games located in some of our theatres. Our investment in NCM has assisted us in expanding our offerings to advertisers, exploring ancillary revenue sources such as digital video monitor advertising, third party branding, and the use of theatres for non-film events. In addition, we are able to use theatres during non-peak hours for concerts, sporting events, and other cultural events. Successful films released during the three months ended March 31, 2009 included Paul Blart: Mall Cop, Taken, Watchmen, Gran Torino, He’s Just Not That Into You, and Monsters vs. Aliens. Film releases scheduled for the remainder of 2009 include Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, Angels & Demons, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Night at the Museum II: Escape from the Smithsonian, Star Trek, Fast and Furious and the release of 3-D movies such as Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs, Avatar, A Christmas Carol, and Disney’s next Pixar installment, Up. Our revenues are affected by changes in attendance and average admissions and concession revenues per patron. Attendance is primarily affected by the quality and quantity of films released by motion picture studios.

     Film rental costs are variable in nature and fluctuate with our admissions revenues. Film rental costs as a percentage of revenues are generally higher for periods in which more blockbuster films are released. Film rental costs can also vary based on the length of a film’s run. Film rental rates are negotiated on a film-by-film and theatre-by-theatre basis. Advertising costs, which are expensed as incurred, are primarily fixed at the theatre level as daily movie directories placed in newspapers represent the largest component of advertising costs. The monthly cost of these advertisements is based on, among other things, the size of the directory and the frequency and size of the newspaper’s circulation.

     Concession supplies expense is variable in nature and fluctuates with our concession revenues. We purchase concession supplies to replace units sold. We negotiate prices for concession supplies directly with concession vendors and manufacturers to obtain bulk rates.

     Although salaries and wages include a fixed cost component (i.e. the minimum staffing costs to operate a theatre facility during non-peak periods), salaries and wages move in relation to revenues as theatre staffing is adjusted to address changes in attendance.

     Facility lease expense is primarily a fixed cost at the theatre level as most of our facility leases require a fixed monthly minimum rent payment. Certain of our leases are subject to percentage rent only while others are subject to percentage rent in addition to their fixed monthly rent if a target annual revenue level is achieved. Facility lease expense as a percentage of revenues is also affected by the number of theatres under operating leases versus the number of theatres under capital leases and the number of fee-owned theatres.

     Utilities and other costs include certain costs that are fixed such as property taxes, certain costs that are variable such as liability insurance, and certain costs that possess both fixed and variable components such as utilities, repairs and maintenance and security services.

     The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of revenues represented by certain items reflected in our condensed consolidated statements of income:

     Three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008

     Revenues. Total revenues increased $24.8 million to $425.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (“first quarter of 2009”) from $401.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 (“first quarter of 2008”), representing a 6.2% increase. The table below, presented by reportable operating segment, summarizes our year-over-year revenue performance and certain key performance indicators that impact our revenues.

     Theatre Operating Costs (excludes depreciation and amortization expense). Theatre operating costs were $315.7 million, or 74.1% of revenues, for the first quarter of 2009 compared to $303.9 million, or 75.8% of revenues, for the first quarter of 2008. The table below, presented by reportable operating segment, summarizes our year-over-year theatre operating costs.

     General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to $21.8 million for the first quarter of 2009 from $20.6 million for the first quarter of 2008. The increase was primarily due to increased salaries and incentive compensation expense, increased share based award compensation expense and increased service charges related to increased credit card activity.

     Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense, including amortization of favorable/ unfavorable leases, was $36.5 million for the first quarter of 2009 compared to $38.1 million for the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily related to the impact of exchange rates in certain countries in which we operate.

     Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. We recorded asset impairment charges on assets held and used of $1.0 million for the first quarter of 2009 compared to $4.5 million during the first quarter of 2008. Impairment charges for the first quarter of 2009 consisted of $0.8 million of U.S. theatre properties, $0.1 million of Mexico theatre properties and $0.1 million of intangible assets associated with Mexico theatre properties. Impairment charges for the first quarter of 2008 consisted of $4.5 million for U.S. theatre properties.

     Interest Expense. Interest costs incurred, including amortization of debt issue costs, were $25.5 million for the first quarter of 2009 compared to $32.1 million for the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the repurchase of $47.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of our 9 3/4 % senior discount notes between March 2008 and December 2008 and a reduction in the variable interest rates on a portion of our long-term debt.

     Distributions from NCM. We recorded distributions from NCM of $6.6 million during the first quarter of 2009 and $5.2 million during the first quarter of 2008, which were in excess of the carrying value of our investment. See Note 6 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.

     Income Taxes. Income tax expense of $14.6 million was recorded for the first quarter of 2009 compared to $3.6 million recorded for the first quarter of 2008. The effective tax rate was 44.4% for the first quarter of 2009 compared to 36.3% for the first quarter of 2008.

     Operating Activities

     We primarily collect our revenues in cash, mainly through box office receipts and the sale of concessions. In addition, a majority of our theatres provide the patron a choice of using a credit card, in place of cash, which we convert to cash over a range of one to six days. Because our revenues are received in cash prior to the payment of related expenses, we have an operating “float” and historically have not required traditional working capital financing. Cash provided by operating activities was $51.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $24.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The increase in cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to increased net income driven by increased revenues.

     Since the issuance of the 9 ³/4% senior discount notes on March 31, 2004, interest has accreted rather than been paid in cash, which has benefited our operating cash flows for the periods presented. Interest will be paid in cash commencing September 15, 2009, at which time our operating cash flows will be impacted by these cash payments. Based on the aggregate principal amount at maturity outstanding at March 31, 2009, semi-annual interest payments will be approximately $20 million.

     Investing Activities

     Our investing activities have been principally related to the development and acquisition of additional theatres. New theatre openings and acquisitions historically have been financed with internally generated cash and by debt financing, including borrowings under our senior secured credit facility. Cash used for investing activities was $71.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $31.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The increase in cash used for investing activities is primarily due to the acquisition of theatres in the U.S. on March 18, 2009, for approximately $49.0 million. See note 5 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

     Capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (in millions):

     We continue to expand our U.S. theatre circuit. We acquired four theatres with 82 screens and closed two theatres with 10 screens during the three months ended March 31, 2009. At March 31, 2009, we had signed commitments to open five new theatres with 62 screens in domestic markets during the remainder of 2009 and open four new theatres with 62 screens subsequent to 2009. We estimate the remaining capital expenditures for the development of these 124 domestic screens will be approximately $41 million. Actual expenditures for continued theatre development and acquisitions are subject to change based upon the availability of attractive opportunities.

     We plan to continue to expand our international theatre circuit. We opened one theatre with five screens and closed three theatres with 14 screens during the three months ended March 31, 2009. At March 31, 2009, we had signed commitments to open three new theatres with 15 screens in international markets during the remainder of 2009 and open one new theatre with 12 screens subsequent to 2009. We estimate the remaining capital expenditures for the development of these 27 international screens will be approximately $12 million. Actual expenditures for continued theatre development and acquisitions are subject to change based upon the availability of attractive opportunities.

     We plan to fund capital expenditures for our continued development with cash flow from operations, borrowings under our senior secured credit facility, subordinated note borrowings, proceeds from sale leaseback transactions and/or sales of excess real estate.

     Financing Activities

     Cash used for financing activities was $23.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $27.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in cash used for financing activities was primarily due to the repurchase of $10.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of our 9 ³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $9.0 million, including accreted interest of $2.9 million, which occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2008.

     On February 13, 2009, our board of directors declared a cash dividend for the fourth quarter of 2008 in the amount of $0.18 per share of common stock payable to stockholders of record on March 5, 2009. The dividend was paid on March 20, 2009 in the total amount of $19.6 million.

     We may from time to time, subject to compliance with our debt instruments, purchase on the open market our debt securities depending upon the availability and prices of such securities. Long-term debt consisted of the following as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

     As of March 31, 2009, we had borrowings of $1,092.0 million outstanding on the term loan under our senior secured credit facility, $419.4 million accreted principal amount outstanding under our 9 ³/4% senior discount notes and approximately $0.2 million aggregate principal amount outstanding under the 9% senior subordinated notes, respectively, and had a minimum of approximately $121.4 million in available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility. The availability of our revolving credit facility may have been impacted by the insolvency of one of the lenders under the facility. As such, while we currently have only $0.1 million (related to a letter of credit) outstanding under the $150 million revolving credit facility, it is uncertain whether this lender would fund its $28.5 million commitment under the revolving credit facility. We were in full compliance with all covenants governing our outstanding debt at March 31, 2009.

     As of March 31, 2009, our long-term debt obligations, scheduled interest payments on long-term debt, future minimum lease obligations under non-cancelable operating and capital leases, scheduled interest payments under capital leases, outstanding letters of credit, and other obligations for each period indicated are summarized as follows:

     Cinemark, Inc. 9 ³/4% Senior Discount Notes

     On March 31, 2004, Cinemark, Inc. issued approximately $577.2 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of 9 ³/4% senior discount notes due 2014. Interest on the notes accreted until March 15, 2009 up to an aggregate principal amount. Cash interest began to accrue at that time and will be payable semi-annually in arrears on March 15 and September 15, commencing on September 15, 2009. Due to Cinemark, Inc.’s holding company status, payments of principal and interest under these notes will be dependent on loans, dividends and other payments from its subsidiaries. Cinemark, Inc. can redeem all or part of the 9 ³/4% senior discount notes.

     Prior to 2008, Cinemark, Inc. repurchased a total of $110.8 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 9 ³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $96.7 million, including accreted interest. Cinemark, Inc. funded these transactions with available cash from its operations and proceeds from our initial public offering of common stock.

     During 2008, in ten open market purchases, Cinemark, Inc. repurchased $47.0 million aggregate principal amount at maturity of its 9 ³/4% senior discount notes for approximately $42.2 million, including accreted interest. Cinemark, Inc. funded the transactions with proceeds from our initial public offering of common stock.

     As of March 31, 2009, the aggregate principal amount at maturity of the notes was approximately $419.4 million.

     The indenture governing the 9 ³/4% senior discount notes contains covenants that limit, among other things, dividends, transactions with affiliates, investments, sales of assets, mergers, repurchases of our capital stock, liens and additional indebtedness. The dividend restriction contained in the indenture prevents Cinemark, Inc. from paying a dividend or otherwise distributing cash to its stockholders unless (1) it is not in default, and the distribution would not cause it to be in default, under the indenture; (2) it would be able to incur at least $1.00 more of indebtedness without the ratio of its consolidated cash flow to its fixed charges (each as defined in the indenture, and calculated on a pro forma basis for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters for which internal financial statements are available, using certain assumptions and modifications specified in the indenture, and including the additional indebtedness then being incurred) falling below two to one (the “fixed charge coverage ratio”); and (3) the aggregate amount of distributions made since March 31, 2004, including the distribution proposed, is less than the sum of (a) half of its consolidated net income (as defined in the indenture) since February 11, 2003, (b) the net proceeds to it from the issuance of stock since April 2, 2004, and (c) certain other amounts specified in the indenture, subject to certain adjustments specified in the indenture.

The dividend restriction is subject to certain exceptions specified in the indenture. As of March 31, 2009, Cinemark Inc.’s fixed charge coverage under the indenture was 3.9, which was in excess of the two to one requirement described above.

     Upon certain specified types of change of control of Cinemark, Inc., Cinemark, Inc. would be required under the indenture to make an offer to repurchase all of the 9 ³/4% senior discount notes at a price equal to 101% of the accreted value of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, through the date of repurchase.

     Senior Secured Credit Facility

     On October 5, 2006, Cinemark USA, Inc. entered into a senior secured credit facility, which provided for a seven year term loan of $1.12 billion and a $150 million revolving credit line that matures in six years.

     At March 31, 2009, there was $1,092.0 million outstanding under the term loan and no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit line. A minimum of approximately $121.4 million was available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility. The availability of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s revolving credit facility may have recently been impacted by the insolvency of one of the lenders under the facility. As such, while Cinemark USA, Inc. currently has only $0.1 million (related to a letter of credit) outstanding under the $150 million revolving credit facility, it is uncertain whether this lender would fund its $28.5 million commitment under the revolving credit facility. The average interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the senior secured credit facility at March 31, 2009 was 3.3% per annum.

     Under the term loan, principal payments of $2.8 million are due each calendar quarter through September 30, 2012 and increase to $263.2 million each calendar quarter from December 31, 2012 to maturity at October 5, 2013.

     The term loan accrues interest, at Cinemark USA, Inc.’s option, at: (A) the base rate equal to the higher of (1) the prime lending rate as set forth on the British Banking Association Telerate page 5, or (2) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, plus a margin that ranges from 0.50% to 0.75% per annum, or (B) a “eurodollar rate” plus a margin that ranges from 1.50% to 1.75%, per annum. In each case, the margin is a function of the corporate credit rating applicable to the borrower. Borrowings under the revolving credit line bear interest, at Cinemark USA, Inc.’s option, at: (A) a base rate equal to the higher of (1) the prime lending rate as set forth on the British Banking Association Telerate page 5 and (2) the federal funds effective rate from time to time plus 0.50%, plus a margin that ranges from 0.50% to 1.00% per annum, or (B) a “eurodollar rate” plus a margin that ranges from 1.50% to 2.00% per annum, in each case as adjusted pursuant to Cinemark USA, Inc.’s consolidated net senior secured leverage ratio as defined in the credit agreement. Cinemark USA, Inc. is required to pay a commitment fee calculated at the rate of 0.50% per annum on the average daily unused portion of the revolving credit line, payable quarterly in arrears, which rate decreases to 0.375% per annum for any fiscal quarter in which Cinemark USA, Inc.’s consolidated net senior secured leverage ratio on the last day of such fiscal quarter is less than 2.25 to 1.0.

     Cinemark USA, Inc.’s obligations under the senior secured credit facility are guaranteed by Cinemark Holdings, Inc., Cinemark, Inc., and certain of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s domestic subsidiaries and are secured by mortgages on certain fee and leasehold properties and security interests in substantially all of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s and the guarantors’ personal property, including, without limitation, pledges of all of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s capital stock, all of the capital stock of Cinemark, Inc., and certain of Cinemark USA, Inc.’s domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the voting stock of certain of its foreign subsidiaries.

     The senior secured credit facility contains usual and customary negative covenants for transactions of this type, including, but not limited to, restrictions on Cinemark USA, Inc.’s ability, and in certain instances, its subsidiaries’ and Cinemark Holdings, Inc.’s, and Cinemark, Inc.’s ability, to consolidate or merge or liquidate, wind up or dissolve; substantially change the nature of its business; sell, transfer or dispose of assets; create or incur indebtedness; create liens; pay dividends, repurchase stock and voluntarily repurchase or redeem the 9 ³/4% senior discount notes; and make capital expenditures and investments. The senior secured credit facility also requires Cinemark USA, Inc. to satisfy a consolidated net senior secured leverage ratio covenant as determined in accordance with the senior secured credit facility. The dividend restriction contained in the senior secured credit facility prevents us and any of our subsidiaries from paying a dividend or otherwise distributing cash to its stockholders unless (1) we are not in default, and the distribution would not cause us to be in default, under the senior secured credit facility; and (2) the aggregate amount of certain dividends, distributions, investments, redemptions and capital expenditures made since October 5, 2006, including dividends declared by the board of directors, is less than the sum of (a) the aggregate amount of cash and cash equivalents received by

Cinemark Holdings, Inc. or Cinemark USA, Inc. as common equity since October 5, 2006, (b) Cinemark USA, Inc.’s consolidated EBITDA minus 1.75 times its consolidated interest expense, each as defined in the senior secured credit facility, since October 1, 2006, (c) $150 million and (d) certain other amounts specified in the senior secured credit facility, subject to certain adjustments specified in the senior secured credit facility. The dividend restriction is subject to certain exceptions specified in the senior secured credit facility.

     The senior secured credit facility also includes customary events of default, including, among other things, payment default, covenant default, breach of representation or warranty, bankruptcy, cross-default, material ERISA events, certain types of change of control, material money judgments and failure to maintain subsidiary guarantees. If an event of default occurs, all commitments under the senior secured credit facility may be terminated and all obligations under the senior secured credit facility could be accelerated by the lenders, causing all loans outstanding (including accrued interest and fees payable thereunder) to be declared immediately due and payable.

     See discussion of interest rate swap agreements under Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

     Cinemark USA, Inc. 9% Senior Subordinated Notes

     On February 11, 2003, Cinemark USA, Inc. issued $150 million aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes due 2013 and on May 7, 2003, Cinemark USA, Inc. issued an additional $210 million aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes due 2013, collectively referred to as the 9% senior subordinated notes. Interest is payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year.

     Prior to 2008, Cinemark USA, Inc. repurchased a total of $359.8 million aggregate principal amount of its 9% senior subordinated notes. The transactions were funded by Cinemark USA, Inc. with proceeds from the NCM Transaction and available cash from operations. Cinemark USA, Inc. also executed a supplemental indenture removing substantially all of the restrictive covenants and certain events of default.

     As of March 31, 2009, Cinemark USA, Inc. had outstanding approximately $0.2 million aggregate principal amount of 9% senior subordinated notes. Cinemark USA, Inc. may redeem the remaining 9% senior subordinated notes at its option at any time.

     Our revenues have historically been seasonal, coinciding with the timing of releases of motion pictures by the major distributors. Generally, the most successful motion pictures have been released during the summer, extending from May to mid-August, and during the holiday season, extending from the beginning of November through year-end. The unexpected emergence of a hit film during other periods can alter this seasonality trend. The timing of such film releases can have a significant effect on our results of operations, and the results of one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for the next quarter or for the same period in the following year.

     We have exposure to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and other relevant market prices.

     We are currently party to variable rate debt facilities. An increase or decrease in interest rates would affect interest costs relating to our variable rate debt facilities. At March 31, 2009, there was an aggregate of approximately $793.9 million of variable rate debt outstanding under these facilities. Based on the interest rate levels in effect on the variable rate debt outstanding at March 31, 2009, a 100 basis point increase in market interest rates would increase our annual interest expense by approximately $7.9 million.

     During 2007 and 2008, we entered into three interest rate swap agreements. The interest rate swap agreements qualify for cash flow hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 133. The fair values of the interest rate swaps are recorded on our consolidated balance sheet as a liability with the effective portion of the interest rate swaps’ gains or losses

reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and the ineffective portion reported in earnings.

     In March 2007, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements with effective dates of August 13, 2007 and terms of five years each. The interest rate swaps were designated to hedge approximately $500.0 million of our variable rate debt obligations. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements, we pay fixed rates of 4.918% and 4.922% on $375.0 million and $125.0 million, respectively, of variable rate debt and receive interest at a variable rate based on the 3-month LIBOR. The 3-month LIBOR rate on each reset date determines the variable portion of the interest rate-swaps for the three-month period following the reset date. No premium or discount was incurred upon us entering into the interest rate swaps because the pay and receive rates on the interest rate swaps represented prevailing rates for each counterparty at the time the interest rate swaps were consummated.

     On September 14, 2008, the counterparty to our $375.0 million interest rate swap agreement filed for bankruptcy protection. As a result, we determined that on September 15, 2008, when the counterparty’s credit rating was downgraded, the interest rate swap was no longer highly effective. On October 1, 2008, we terminated this interest rate swap.

     On October 3, 2008, we entered into one interest rate swap agreement with an effective date of November 14, 2008 and a term of four years. The interest rate swap was designated to hedge approximately $100.0 million of our variable rate debt obligations under our senior secured credit facility for three years and $75.0 million of our variable rate debt obligations under our senior secured credit facility for four years. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, we pay a fixed rate of 3.63% on $175.0 million of variable rate debt and receive interest at a variable rate based on the 1-month LIBOR. The 1-month LIBOR rate on each reset date determines the variable portion of the interest rate swap for the one-month period following the reset date. No premium or discount was incurred by us upon entering into the interest rate swap because the pay and receive rates on the interest rate swap represented prevailing rates for the counterparty at the time the interest rate swap was consummated.

     The table below provides information about our fixed rate and variable rate long-term debt agreements as of March 31, 2009: