Companies:
10,652
total market cap:
$140.568 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
CPKC (Canadian Pacific Kansas City)
CP
#318
Rank
$75.20 B
Marketcap
๐จ๐ฆ
Canada
Country
$83.78
Share price
0.08%
Change (1 day)
6.06%
Change (1 year)
๐ Railways
๐ Transportation
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports
Annual Reports (10-K)
Sustainability Reports
CPKC (Canadian Pacific Kansas City)
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2016 Q2
CPKC (Canadian Pacific Kansas City) - 10-Q quarterly report FY2016 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-01342
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Canada
98-0355078
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
7550 Ogden Dale Road S.E.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
T2C 4X9
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (403) 319-7000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
þ
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
Smaller reporting company
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
As of the close of business on July 18, 2016, there were 147,771,618 of the registrant’s Common Shares issued and outstanding.
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY LIMITED
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page
Item 1.
Financial Statements:
Interim Consolidated Statements of Income
3
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
Interim Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
4
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets
5
As at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
6
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
7
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
8
Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
30
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
58
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
59
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
60
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
60
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
60
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
60
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
60
Item 5.
Other Information
60
Item 6.
Exhibits
61
2
PART I
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
(in millions of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Revenues
Freight
$
1,406
$
1,610
$
2,954
$
3,240
Non-freight
44
41
87
76
Total revenues
1,450
1,651
3,041
3,316
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits
284
308
613
686
Fuel
131
185
256
380
Materials
38
45
94
97
Equipment rents
44
46
89
88
Depreciation and amortization
161
145
323
291
Purchased services and other (Note 4)
241
276
462
516
Total operating expenses
899
1,005
1,837
2,058
Operating income
551
646
1,204
1,258
Less:
Other income and charges (Note 5)
(9
)
(5
)
(190
)
68
Net interest expense
115
84
239
169
Income before income tax expense
445
567
1,155
1,021
Income tax expense (Note 6)
117
177
287
311
Net income
$
328
$
390
$
868
$
710
Earnings per share (Note 7)
Basic earnings per share
$
2.16
$
2.38
$
5.70
$
4.32
Diluted earnings per share
$
2.15
$
2.36
$
5.67
$
4.28
Weighted-average number of shares (millions) (Note 7)
Basic
151.7
163.7
152.3
164.3
Diluted
152.6
165.0
153.2
165.7
Dividends declared per share
$
0.5000
$
0.3500
$
0.8500
$
0.7000
See Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(unaudited)
Year ended (in millions of Canadian dollars)
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Net income
$
328
$
390
$
868
$
710
Net gain (loss) in foreign currency translation adjustments, net of hedging activities
3
7
40
(30
)
Change in derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
(29
)
36
(76
)
(33
)
Change in pension and post-retirement defined benefit plans
43
66
90
138
Other comprehensive income before income taxes
17
109
54
75
Income tax (expense) recovery on above items
(7
)
(35
)
(48
)
11
Other comprehensive income (Note 3)
10
74
6
86
Comprehensive income
$
338
$
464
$
874
$
796
See Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS AT
(unaudited)
June 30
December 31
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
2016
2015
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
92
$
650
Accounts receivable, net
577
645
Materials and supplies
195
188
Other current assets
59
54
923
1,537
Investments
155
152
Properties
16,160
16,273
Goodwill and intangible assets
195
211
Pension asset
1,565
1,401
Other assets
70
63
Total assets
$
19,068
$
19,637
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$
1,247
$
1,417
Long-term debt maturing within one year (Note 8)
198
30
1,445
1,447
Pension and other benefit liabilities
751
758
Other long-term liabilities
286
318
Long-term debt
8,383
8,927
Deferred income taxes
3,512
3,391
Total liabilities
14,377
14,841
Shareholders’ equity
Share capital
2,000
2,058
Additional paid-in capital
49
43
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 3)
(1,471
)
(1,477
)
Retained earnings
4,113
4,172
4,691
4,796
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
19,068
$
19,637
Contingencies (Note 13)
See Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
Year ended (in millions of Canadian dollars)
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Operating activities
Net income
$
328
$
390
$
868
$
710
Reconciliation of net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
161
145
323
291
Deferred income taxes (Note 6)
90
74
183
106
Pension funding in excess of expense (Note 12)
(37
)
(20
)
(79
)
(30
)
Foreign exchange (gain) loss on long-term debt (Note 5)
(18
)
(10
)
(199
)
54
Other operating activities, net
(47
)
(28
)
(113
)
(69
)
Change in non-cash working capital balances related to operations
35
34
(253
)
78
Cash provided by operating activities
512
585
730
1,140
Investing activities
Additions to properties
(330
)
(355
)
(608
)
(618
)
Proceeds from sale of properties and other assets (Note 4)
11
8
71
60
Other
(2
)
(7
)
(2
)
13
Cash used in investing activities
(321
)
(354
)
(539
)
(545
)
Financing activities
Dividends paid
(53
)
(57
)
(107
)
(115
)
Issuance of CP Common Shares
4
11
9
27
Purchase of CP Common Shares (Note 9)
(788
)
(543
)
(788
)
(1,072
)
Issuance of long-term debt, excluding commercial paper
—
—
—
810
Repayment of long-term debt, excluding commercial paper
(7
)
(9
)
(18
)
(67
)
Net issuance (repayment) of commercial paper (Note 8)
176
369
176
(224
)
Other
(1
)
—
(3
)
—
Cash used in financing activities
(669
)
(229
)
(731
)
(641
)
Effect of foreign currency fluctuations on U.S. dollar-denominated cash and cash equivalents
(1
)
(1
)
(18
)
5
Cash position
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(479
)
1
(558
)
(41
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
571
184
650
226
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
92
$
185
$
92
$
185
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Income taxes paid
$
65
$
62
$
257
$
59
Interest paid
$
92
$
94
$
247
$
161
See Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(unaudited)
(in millions of Canadian dollars, except common share amounts)
Common shares (in millions)
Share
capital
Additional
paid-in
capital
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
Retained
earnings
Total
shareholders’
equity
Balance at January 1, 2016
153.0
$
2,058
$
43
$
(1,477
)
$
4,172
$
4,796
Net income
—
—
—
—
868
868
Other comprehensive income (Note 3)
—
—
—
6
—
6
Dividends declared
—
—
—
—
(130
)
(130
)
Effect of stock-based compensation expense
—
—
8
—
—
8
CP Common Shares repurchased (Note 9)
(4.7
)
(70
)
—
—
(797
)
(867
)
Shares issued under stock option plan
0.1
12
(2
)
—
—
10
Balance at June 30, 2016
148.4
$
2,000
$
49
$
(1,471
)
$
4,113
$
4,691
Balance at January 1, 2015
166.1
$
2,185
$
36
$
(2,219
)
$
5,608
$
5,610
Net income
—
—
—
—
710
710
Other comprehensive income (Note 3)
—
—
—
86
—
86
Dividends declared
—
—
—
—
(115
)
(115
)
Effect of stock-based compensation expense
—
—
10
—
—
10
CP Common Shares repurchased (Note 9)
(5.2
)
(70
)
—
—
(1,010
)
(1,080
)
Shares issued under stock option plan
0.4
36
(6
)
—
—
30
Balance at June 30, 2015
161.3
$
2,151
$
40
$
(2,133
)
$
5,193
$
5,251
See Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2016
(unaudited)
1
Basis of presentation
These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (“CP”, or “the Company”), expressed in Canadian dollars, reflect management’s estimates and assumptions that are necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). They do not include all disclosures required under GAAP for annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the
2015
annual consolidated financial statements and notes included in CP's
2015
Annual Report on Form 10-K. The accounting policies used are consistent with the accounting policies used in preparing the
2015
annual consolidated financial statements, except for the newly adopted accounting policy discussed in Note 2.
CP's operations can be affected by seasonal fluctuations such as changes in customer demand and weather-related issues. This seasonality could impact quarter-over-quarter comparisons.
In management’s opinion, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly such information. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the fiscal year.
2
Accounting changes
Implemented in 2016
Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis
In February 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis under FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 810 Consolidation. The amendments required reporting entities to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (“VIEs”) or voting interest entities, eliminated the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership and affected the consolidation analysis of reporting entities involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships. This ASU was effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2015. Entities had the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt this ASU. The Company evaluated all arrangements that might give rise to a VIE and all existing VIEs; no changes to disclosure or financial statement presentation were required as a result of this evaluation.
Future changes
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. The new FASB ASC Topic 842 Leases supersedes the lease recognition and measurement requirements in Topic 840 Leases. This new standard requires recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as finance and operating leases with a maximum term exceeding 12 months. This ASU will be effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2018. Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach to adopt this ASU. The Company is currently evaluating the impact adoption of this ASU will have on the consolidated financial statements.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Principal versus Agent Considerations under FASB ASC Topic 606. The amendments clarify the principal versus agent guidance in determining whether to recognize revenue on a gross or net basis. The amendments are effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt this ASU. The Company is currently evaluating the impact adoption of this ASU will have on the consolidated financial statements.
Compensation - Stock Compensation
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation, under ASC Topic 718. The amendments clarify the guidance relating to treatment of excess tax benefits and deficiencies, acceptable forfeiture rate policies, and treatment of cash paid by an employer when directly withholding shares for tax-withholding purposes and the requirement to treat such cash flows as a financing activity. This ASU will be effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
8
beginning on or after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact adoption of this ASU will have on the consolidated financial statements.
3
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss ("AOCL") by component
For the three months ended June 30
(in millions of Canadian dollars, net of tax)
Foreign currency
net of hedging
activities
Derivatives and other
Pension and post-retirement defined benefit plans
Total
Opening balance, 2016
$
125
$
(136
)
$
(1,470
)
$
(1,481
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(1
)
(23
)
(2
)
(26
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
—
2
34
36
Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income
(1
)
(21
)
32
10
Closing balance, 2016
$
124
$
(157
)
$
(1,438
)
$
(1,471
)
Opening balance, 2015
$
125
$
(103
)
$
(2,229
)
$
(2,207
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
—
26
—
26
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
—
—
48
48
Net current-period other comprehensive income
—
26
48
74
Closing balance, 2015
$
125
$
(77
)
$
(2,181
)
$
(2,133
)
For the six months ended June 30
(in millions of Canadian dollars, net of tax)
Foreign currency
net of hedging
activities
Derivatives and other
Pension and post-retirement defined benefit plans
Total
Opening balance, 2016
$
129
$
(102
)
$
(1,504
)
$
(1,477
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(5
)
(59
)
(2
)
(66
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
—
4
68
72
Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income
(5
)
(55
)
66
6
Closing balance, 2016
$
124
$
(157
)
$
(1,438
)
$
(1,471
)
Opening balance, 2015
$
115
$
(52
)
$
(2,282
)
$
(2,219
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
10
(26
)
5
(11
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
—
1
96
97
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
10
(25
)
101
86
Closing balance, 2015
$
125
$
(77
)
$
(2,181
)
$
(2,133
)
9
Amounts in Pension and post-retirement defined benefit plans reclassified from AOCL
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Amortization of prior service costs
(a)
$
(1
)
$
(2
)
$
(3
)
$
(3
)
Recognition of net actuarial loss
(a)
48
67
97
134
Total before income tax
47
65
94
131
Income tax recovery
(13
)
(17
)
(26
)
(35
)
Net of income tax
$
34
$
48
$
68
$
96
(a)
Impacts Compensation and benefits on the Interim Consolidated Statements of Income.
4
Gain on sale of properties
Gain on sale of Arbutus Corridor
In March 2016, the Company announced the sale of CP’s Arbutus Corridor (the “Arbutus Corridor”) to the City of Vancouver for gross proceeds of
$55 million
. The agreement allows the Company to share in future proceeds on the eventual development and/or sale of certain parcels of the Arbutus Corridor. The Company recorded a gain on sale of
$50 million
before tax (
$43 million
after tax) from the transaction during the first quarter of 2016.
Gain on settlement of legal proceedings related to the purchase and sale of a building
In 2013, CP provided an interest free loan pursuant to a court order to a corporation owned by a court appointed trustee (“the judicial trustee”) to facilitate the acquisition of a building. The building was held in trust during the legal proceedings with regard to CP’s entitlement to an exercised purchase option of the building. As at December 31, 2014, the loan of
$20 million
and the purchase
option with a carrying value of
$8 million
, were recorded as “Other assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In the first quarter of 2015, CP reached a settlement with a third party that, following the sale of the building to an arm’s length third party, resulted in resolution of legal proceedings. CP received
$59 million
for the sale of the building which included repayment of the aforementioned loan to the judicial trustee and recorded a gain of
$31 million
(
$27 million
after tax).
5
Other income and charges
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Foreign exchange (gain) loss on long-term debt
$
(18
)
$
(10
)
$
(199
)
$
54
Other foreign exchange (gains) losses
—
—
(7
)
6
Other
9
5
16
8
Total other income and charges
$
(9
)
$
(5
)
$
(190
)
$
68
6
Income taxes
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Current income tax expense
$
27
$
103
$
104
$
205
Deferred income tax expense
90
74
183
106
Income tax expense
$
117
$
177
$
287
$
311
The estimated
2016
annual effective tax rate for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
, excluding the discrete item related to the foreign exchange gain on the Company’s U.S. dollar-denominated debt, is
26.93%
and
27.25%
, respectively, compared to the estimate of
27.50%
for the same periods in
2015
.
The effective tax rate for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
, including the discrete item, is
26.40%
and
24.86%
, respectively, compared to
31.30%
and
30.51%
, respectively, for the same period in
2015
.
10
7
Earnings per share
At
June 30, 2016
, the number of shares outstanding was
148.4 million
(
June 30, 2015
-
161.3 million
).
Basic earnings per share have been calculated using net income for the period divided by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period.
The number of shares used in earnings per share calculations is reconciled as follows:
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
(in millions)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding
151.7
163.7
152.3
164.3
Dilutive effect of stock options
0.9
1.3
0.9
1.4
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding
152.6
165.0
153.2
165.7
For the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
, there were
440,009
options and
443,000
options, respectively, excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effects were not dilutive (
three and six months ended
June 30, 2015
-
175,068
and
87,976
, respectively).
8
Debt
Revolving credit facility
Effective June 28, 2016, the Company extended the maturity date by one year on its existing revolving U.S.
$2.0 billion
revolving credit facility, which includes a U.S.
$1.0 billion
five-year portion and U.S.
$1.0 billion
one-year plus one-year term-out portion. The maturity date on the U.S.
$1.0 billion
one-year plus one-year term-out portion has been extended to June 28, 2018; the maturity date on the U.S.
$1.0 billion
five-year portion was extended to June 28, 2021.
Commercial paper program
The Company has a commercial paper program which enables it to issue commercial paper up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of U.S.
$1.0 billion
in the form of unsecured promissory notes. The commercial paper is backed by the U.S.
$1.0 billion
one-year plus one-year term-out portion of the revolving credit facility. As at June 30, 2016, the Company had total commercial paper borrowings of U.S.
$135 million
(
$174 million
), presented in “Long-term debt maturing within one year” on the Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets (December 31, 2015 - $
nil
). The weighted-average interest rate on these borrowings was
0.67%
.
The Company presents issuances and repayments of commercial paper in the Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows on a net basis, all of which have a maturity of
less than 90 days
.
9
Shareholders' equity
On April 20, 2016, the Company announced a new normal course issuer bid ("bid"), commencing May 2, 2016 to May 1, 2017, to purchase up to
6.91 million
of its outstanding Common Shares for cancellation.
All purchases are made in accordance with the bid at prevalent market prices plus brokerage fees, or such other prices that may be permitted by the Toronto Stock Exchange, with consideration allocated to share capital up to the average carrying amount of the shares, and any excess allocated to retained earnings. The following table provides activities under the share repurchase program:
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
2016
2015
Number of Common Shares repurchased
(1)
5,127,800
3,058,900
5,127,800
5,233,688
Weighted-average price per share
(2)
$
169.13
$
193.10
$
169.13
$
206.40
Amount of repurchase (in millions)
(2)
$
867
$
590
$
867
$
1,080
(1)
Includes shares repurchased but not yet canceled at quarter end.
(2)
Includes brokerage fees.
11
10
Financial instruments
A. Fair values of financial instruments
The Company categorizes its financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value in line with the fair value hierarchy established by GAAP that prioritizes, with respect to reliability, the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy consists of three broad levels. Level 1 inputs consist of quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and give the highest priority to these inputs. Level 2 and 3 inputs are based on significant other observable inputs and significant unobservable inputs, respectively, and give lower priority to these inputs.
When possible, the estimated fair value is based on quoted market prices and, if not available, estimates from third party brokers. For non-exchange traded derivatives classified in Level 2, the Company uses standard valuation techniques to calculate fair value. Primary inputs to these techniques include observable market prices (interest, foreign exchange (“FX”) and commodity) and volatility, depending on the type of derivative and nature of the underlying risk. The Company uses inputs and data used by willing market participants when valuing derivatives and considers its own credit default swap spread as well as those of its counterparties in its determination of fair value.
The carrying values of financial instruments equal or approximate their fair values with the exception of long-term debt which has a fair value of approximately
$10,335 million
at
June 30, 2016
(December 31, 2015 -
$9,750 million
) and a carrying value of
$8,581
million at
June 30, 2016
(December 31, 2015 -
$8,957 million
). The estimated fair value of current and long-term borrowings has been determined based on market information where available, or by discounting future payments of interest and principal at estimated interest rates expected to be available to the Company at period end. All derivatives and long-term debt are classified as Level 2.
B. Financial risk management
Derivative financial instruments
Derivative financial instruments may be used to selectively reduce volatility associated with fluctuations in interest rates, FX rates, the price of fuel and stock-based compensation expense. Where derivatives are designated as hedging instruments, the relationship between the hedging instruments and their associated hedged items is documented, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for the use of the hedging instruments. This documentation includes linking the derivatives that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets or liabilities on the Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets, commitments or forecasted transactions. At the time a derivative contract is entered into, and at least quarterly thereafter, an assessment is made whether the derivative item is effective in offsetting the changes in fair value or cash flows of the hedged items. The derivative qualifies for hedge accounting treatment if it is effective in substantially mitigating the risk it was designed to address.
It is not the Company’s intent to use financial derivatives or commodity instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
FX management
The Company conducts business transactions and owns assets in both Canada and the United States. As a result, the Company is exposed to fluctuations in value of financial commitments, assets, liabilities, income or cash flows due to changes in FX rates. The Company may enter into FX risk management transactions primarily to manage fluctuations in the exchange rate between Canadian and U.S. currencies. FX exposure is primarily mitigated through natural offsets created by revenues, expenditures and balance sheet positions incurred in the same currency. Where appropriate, the Company may negotiate with customers and suppliers to reduce the net exposure.
Net investment hedge
The FX gains and losses on long-term debt are mainly unrealized and can only be realized when U.S. dollar denominated long-term debt matures or is settled. The Company also has long-term FX exposure on its investment in U.S. affiliates. The majority of the Company’s U.S. dollar denominated long-term debt has been designated as a hedge of the net investment in foreign subsidiaries. This designation has the effect of mitigating volatility on net income by offsetting long-term FX gains and losses on U.S. dollar denominated long-term debt and gains and losses on its net investment. The effective portion recognized in “Other comprehensive income” for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
was an unrealized FX gain of
$24 million
and
$332 million
, respectively (
three and six months ended
June 30, 2015
- unrealized FX gain of
$58 million
and an unrealized FX loss of
$298 million
, respectively). There was
no
ineffectiveness during the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2015
.
Interest rate management
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk, which is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will vary as a result of changes in market interest rates. In order to manage funding needs or capital structure goals, the Company enters into debt or capital lease agreements that are subject to either fixed market interest rates set at the time of issue or floating
12
rates determined by on-going market conditions. Debt subject to variable interest rates exposes the Company to variability in interest expense, while debt subject to fixed interest rates exposes the Company to variability in the fair value of debt.
To manage interest rate exposure, the Company accesses diverse sources of financing and manages borrowings in line with a targeted range of capital structure, debt ratings, liquidity needs, maturity schedule, and currency and interest rate profiles. In anticipation of future debt issuances, the Company may enter into forward rate agreements, that are designated as cash flow hedges, to substantially lock in all or a portion of the effective future interest expense. The Company may also enter into swap agreements, designated as fair value hedges, to manage the mix of fixed and floating rate debt.
Forward starting swaps
As at December 31, 2015, the Company had forward starting floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements (“forward starting swaps”) totaling a notional U.S.
$700 million
to fix the benchmark rate on cash flows associated with highly probable forecasted issuances of long-term notes. The effective portion of changes in fair value on the forward starting swaps is recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss”, net of tax, as cash flow hedges until the highly probable forecasted notes are issued. Subsequent to the notes issuance, amounts in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” are reclassified to “Net interest expense”.
During the second quarter of 2016, the Company rolled the notional U.S.
$700 million
forward starting swaps. The Company de-designated the hedging relationship for U.S.
$700 million
of forward starting swaps. The Company did not cash settle these swaps. There was no ineffectiveness to record upon de-designation.
Concurrently the Company re-designated the forward starting swaps totaling U.S.
$700 million
to fix the benchmark rate on cash flows associated with a highly probable forecasted debt issuance of long-term notes.
As at
June 30, 2016
, the total fair value loss of
$144 million
(
December 31, 2015
- fair value loss of
$60 million
) derived from the forward starting swaps was included in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities”. Changes in fair value from the forward starting swaps for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
was a loss of
$32 million
and
$84 million
, respectively (
three and six months ended
June 30, 2015
- a gain of
$34 million
and a loss of
$39 million
, respectively). The effective portion for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
of a loss of
$32 million
and
$82 million
, respectively, (
three and six months ended
June 30, 2015
- a fair value gain of
$34 million
and a fair value loss of
$37 million
, respectively) is recorded in “Other comprehensive income”. For the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
, the ineffective portion of $
nil
and
$2 million
loss, respectively (
three and six months ended
June 30, 2015
- $
nil
and
$2 million
loss, respectively) is recorded to “Net interest expense” on the Interim Consolidated Statements of Income.
For the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
, a loss of
$3 million
and
$5 million
, respectively, related to previous forward starting swap hedges have been amortized to “Net interest expense” (
three and six months ended
June 30, 2015
- a loss of
$1 million
and
$2 million
, respectively). The Company expects that during the next 12 months
$11 million
of losses will be amortized to “Net interest expense”.
11
Stock-based compensation
At
June 30, 2016
, the Company had several stock-based compensation plans, including stock option plans, various cash settled liability plans and an employee stock savings plan. These plans resulted in an expense for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
of
$1 million
and
$15 million
, respectively (
three and six months ended
June 30, 2015
- recovery of
$5 million
and an expense of
$24 million
, respectively).
Regular options
In the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
, under CP’s stock option plans, the Company issued
402,331
regular options at the weighted average price of
$165.55
per share, based on the closing price on the grant date.
Pursuant to the employee plan, these regular options may be exercised upon vesting, which is between
12 months
and
48 months
after the grant date, and will expire after
10 years
.
13
Under the fair value method, the fair value of the regular options at the grant date was approximately
$16 million
. The weighted average fair value assumptions were approximately:
For the six months ended June 30, 2016
Grant price
$165.55
Expected option life (years)
(1)
5.25
Risk-free interest rate
(2)
1.21%
Expected stock price volatility
(3)
26.58%
Expected annual dividends per share
(4)
$1.40
Expected forfeiture rate
(5)
2.0%
Weighted-average grant date fair value per regular options granted during the period
$38.98
(1)
Represents the period of time that awards are expected to be outstanding. Historical data on exercise behaviour, or when available, specific expectations regarding future exercise behaviour, were used to estimate the expected life of the option.
(2)
Based on the implied yield available on zero-coupon government issues with an equivalent remaining term at the time of the grant.
(3)
Based on the historical stock price volatility of the Company’s stock over a period commensurate with the expected term of the option.
(4)
Determined by the current annual dividend at the time of grant. The Company does not employ different dividend yields throughout the contractual term of the option. On April 20, 2016, the Company announced an increase in its quarterly dividend to
$0.50
per share, representing
$2.00
on an annual basis.
(5)
The Company estimated forfeitures based on past experience. This rate is monitored on a periodic basis.
Performance share unit (“PSU”) plan
In the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
, the Company issued
147,157
PSUs with a grant date fair value of approximately
$24 million
. These units attract dividend equivalents in the form of additional units based on the dividends paid on the Company’s Common Shares. PSUs vest and are settled in cash, or in CP Common Shares, approximately three years after the grant date, contingent upon CP’s performance ("performance factor"). The fair value of PSUs is measured periodically until settlement, using a latticed-based valuation model.
The performance period for PSUs issued in the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
is January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. The performance factors for these PSUs are Operating Ratio, Return on Invested Capital, Total Shareholder Return ("TSR") compared to the S&P/TSX 60 Index, and TSR compared to Class I railways.
The performance period for the PSUs issued in the fourth quarter of 2012 and in 2013 was January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015. The performance factors for these PSUs were Operating Ratio, Free cash flow, TSR compared to the S&P/TSX 60 index, TSR compared to Class I railways. All performance factors met the
200%
payout thresholds, in effect resulting in a target payout of
200%
on
300,095
total outstanding awards as at December 31, 2015. A payout of
$79 million
on
217,179
outstanding awards occurred on December 31, 2015 and was calculated using the Company's average share price using the last
30
trading days preceding December 31, 2015. In the first quarter of 2016, final payouts occurred on the total outstanding awards, including dividends reinvested, totaling
$31 million
on
83,563
outstanding awards.
Deferred share unit (“DSU”) plan
In the
six months ended
June 30, 2016
, the Company granted
25,050
DSUs with a grant date fair value of approximately
$4 million
. DSUs vest over various periods of up to
48 months
and are only redeemable for a specified period after employment is terminated. An expense to income for DSUs is recognized over the vesting period for both the initial subscription price and the change in value between reporting periods.
14
12
Pension and other benefits
In the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
, the Company made contributions of
$14 million
and
$34 million
, respectively(
three and six months ended
June 30, 2015
-
$20 million
and
$41 million
, respectively), to its defined benefit pension plans. The elements of net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit pension plans and other benefits recognized in the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
included the following components:
For the three months ended June 30
Pensions
Other benefits
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Current service cost (benefits earned by employees in the period)
$
26
$
32
$
3
$
3
Interest cost on benefit obligation
116
116
5
5
Expected return on fund assets
(211
)
(212
)
—
—
Recognized net actuarial loss
47
66
1
1
Amortization of prior service costs
(1
)
(2
)
—
—
Net periodic benefit (recovery) cost
$
(23
)
$
—
$
9
$
9
For the six months ended June 30
Pensions
Other benefits
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Current service cost (benefits earned by employees in the period)
$
53
$
64
$
6
$
6
Interest cost on benefit obligation
233
231
10
10
Expected return on fund assets
(423
)
(413
)
—
—
Recognized net actuarial loss
95
132
2
2
Amortization of prior service costs
(3
)
(3
)
—
—
Net periodic benefit (recovery) cost
$
(45
)
$
11
$
18
$
18
13
Contingencies
In the normal course of its operations, the Company becomes involved in various legal actions, including claims relating to injuries and damage to property. The Company maintains provisions it considers to be adequate for such actions. While the final outcome with respect to actions outstanding or pending at
June 30, 2016
cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that their resolution will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Legal proceedings related to Lac-Mégantic rail accident
On July 6, 2013, a train carrying crude oil operated by Montreal Maine and Atlantic Railway (“MMA”) and/or its subsidiary, Montreal Maine and Atlantic Canada Co. (“MMAC”, and collectively with MMA, the “MMA Group”) derailed and exploded in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec on a section of railway line owned by the MMA Group. The previous day CP had interchanged the train to the MMA Group, and after that interchange MMA Group exercised exclusive control over the train.
Following this incident, the Minister of Sustainable Development, Environment, Wildlife and Parks of Quebec issued an order directing certain named parties to recover the contaminants and to clean up and decontaminate the derailment site. CP was added as a named party on August 14, 2013 (the “Amended Cleanup Order”). CP has sought an administrative appeal of the Amended Cleanup Order to the Administrative Tribunal of Quebec. The proceedings before the Administrative tribunal have been stayed until September 2016. Directly related to this matter, the Province of Quebec filed a lawsuit against CP before the Quebec Superior Court on July 6, 2015 in which it claims
$409 million
for the damages sustained by the province as a result of the expenses incurred following the derailment, including costs incurred for the work carried out pursuant to the Amended Cleanup Order. The province alleges that CP had custody or control of the contaminants that were discharged in Lac-Mégantic on July 6, 2013, and that CP was otherwise negligent and therefore is solidarily (joint and severally) liable with the other third parties responsible for the accident. The province’s lawsuit has been stayed until September 12, 2016. Also directly related to the this matter, the Quebec Minister of Sustainable Development and Environment has served a Notice of Claim on July 5, 2016 claiming nearly
$95 million
in compensation from CP for having to carry out the cleanup measures set out in the Amended Cleanup Order, alleging that CP had refused or neglected to carry out same. These proceedings are duplicative, in whole or in part.
A class action lawsuit has also been filed in the Superior Court of Quebec on behalf of a class of persons and entities residing in, owning or leasing property in, operating a business in or physically present in Lac-Mégantic (the “Class Action”). The lawsuit seeks
15
damages caused by the derailment including for wrongful deaths, personal injuries, and property damages. CP was added as a defendant on August 16, 2013. On May 8, 2015, the Superior Court of Quebec authorized the institution of the Class Action as against CP and as against the shipper, Western Petroleum, and the shipper’s parent, World Fuel Services (collectively, the “World Fuel Defendants”). The World Fuel Defendants have since settled. No timetable governing the conduct of this lawsuit has been ordered by the Superior Court of Quebec.
On July 4, 2016, CP was served with subrogated insurance claims brought by
8
insurers for a claimed amount of approximately
$16 million
. On July 11, 2016, CP was served with subrogated insurance claims brought by an additional
2
insurers for a claimed amount of approximately
$3 million
. These insurers have not identified in their respective lawsuit the identity of the parties to whose claims they are subrogated and thus it is difficult to determine the extent to which these claims overlap with other claims and the extent to which their claim would be satisfied after their proof of claim has been reviewed and distribution is received from the Plans of arrangements referred to below.
In the wake of the derailment and ensuing litigation, MMAC filed for bankruptcy in Canada (the “Canadian Proceeding”) and MMA filed for bankruptcy in the United States (the “U.S. Proceeding”). Plans of arrangement have been approved both in the Canadian Proceeding and the U.S. Proceeding (the “Plans”). These Plans provide for the distribution of a fund of approximately
$440 million
amongst those who claimed loss or damage as a result of the derailment and will release those parties which contributed to the fund from any further liability. The Plans also provide for broadly worded third-party releases and injunctions that prevent actions against settling parties. CP has not participated in the settlement and hence will not benefit from any third-party releases or injunctions. In addition, both Plans contain judgment reduction provisions. Pursuant to these provisions, in the event of a judgment against CP in a case arising from the Lac-Mégantic derailment, CP will receive a credit for the greater of (i) the settlement monies received by the plaintiff(s) for the claim, or (ii) the amount which, but for the third-party non-debtor injunctions, CP would have been entitled to obtain from third parties other than MMA and MMAC through contribution or indemnification. CP may also have rights to judgment reduction, as part of the contribution/indemnification credit, for the fault of MMA and/or MMAC. The provisions of the Plans also provide for a potential re-allocation of of the MMA Group’s liability among plaintiffs and CP, the only non-settling party.
An Adversary Proceeding filed by the MMA U.S. bankruptcy trustee against CP, Irving Oil and the World Fuel Defendants accuses CP of failing to ensure that World Fuel Defendants or Irving Oil properly classified the oil lading and of not refusing to ship the oil in DOT-111 tank cars. The trustee has since settled with the World Fuel Defendants and Irving Oil and now maintains that CP misfeasance is based upon the railroad’s failure to abide by a Canadian regulation in North Dakota that supposedly would have caused the originating railroad to refuse to carry the crude oil based upon reason to suspect inaccurate classification. In response to CP’s motion to withdraw the Adversary Proceedings from the bankruptcy reference, the trustee maintained that Canadian law rather than U.S. law controlled, and the Article III court found that if the federal regulations governed, the case was not complex enough to warrant withdrawal. In bankruptcy court CP moved to dismiss for want of personal jurisdiction, but that motion, which was heard on August 18, 2015, has been denied. Motions to dismiss on procedural grounds are pending. The trustee recently withdrew objection to the trial of the Adversary Proceedings to a jury before the Article III district court.
There are also a class action and a mass action instituted Texas and wrongful death and personal injury actions instituted in Illinois and Maine. All the various lawsuits have been removed to federal court and have since been consolidated in Maine. These actions generally charge CP with negligence in the misclassification and mis-packaging (that is the use of inappropriate DOT-111 tank cars). Motions to dismiss have been filed and heard regarding jurisdiction and venue. Decisions on CP’s motions and other parties’ cross-motions are pending.
CP has received
two
damage to cargo notices of claims from the shipper of the oil on the derailed train, Western Petroleum. Western Petroleum submitted U.S. and Canadian notices of claims for the same damages and, under the Carmack Amendment (49 U.S.C. Section 11706), seeks to recover for all injuries associated with, and indemnification for the derailment. Both jurisdictions permit a shipper to recover the value of damaged lading against any carrier in the delivery chain, subject to limitations in the carrier’s tariffs. CP’s tariffs significantly restrict shipper damage claim rights. Western Petroleum is part of the World Fuel Services group, and those entities settled with the trustee.
On April 12, 2016, Trustee (the “WD Trustee”) of a wrongful death trust (the “WD Trust”), as defined and established under the confirmed Plan, filed an action against CP in federal court in North Dakota seeking to establish Carmack Amendment liability under 49 U.S.C. Section 11706. The WD Trustee asserts the WD Trust was assigned Carmack claim rights by the bankruptcy estate representative. The parties that settled Lac Megantic derailment liability in connection with MMA’s confirmed Plan supposedly gave the bankruptcy estate representative the right to assign Carmack claims. The WD Trustee seeks to recover losses associated with the lost lading (approximately
$6 million
), as well as settlement amounts the consignor (i.e, the shipper, World Fuel Entities) and the consignee (Irving Oil) paid to the MMA bankruptcy estate to settle all Lac Megantic derailment claims, which are alleged to be
$110 million
and
$60 million
respectively. The WD Trustee maintains that Carmack liability extends beyond lading losses to cover all derailment related damages incurred by the World Fuel Services group or Irving Oil. CP disputes this interpretation of damages to lading law and maintains that CP’s tariffs, if applicable, would preclude such a result.
At this early stage of the legal proceedings, any potential liability and the quantum of potential loss cannot be determined. Nevertheless, CP denies liability for the MMA derailment and intends to vigorously defend itself in the proceedings described above and in any proceeding that may be commenced in the future.
16
Legal proceedings initiated by Canadian National Railway Company
On August 13, 2015, Canadian National Railway Company (“CN”) issued a statement of claim against the Company and an employee. The statement of claim was amended on January 7, 2016 to include an additional employee and an officer of the Company. The principal allegations against the Company are that the Company obtained and benefited from certain confidential CN customer data. CN is seeking damages but has not yet provided evidence to substantiate its damages claim. The Company plans to defend this claim and the amount of loss, if any, to the Company as a result of the claim cannot be reasonably estimated.
Environmental liabilities
Environmental remediation accruals, recorded on an undiscounted basis unless a reliable, determinable estimate as to an amount and timing of costs can be established, cover site-specific remediation programs.
The accruals for environmental remediation represent CP’s best estimate of its probable future obligation and include both asserted and unasserted claims, without reduction for anticipated recoveries from third parties. Although the recorded accruals include CP’s best estimate of all probable costs, CP’s total environmental remediation costs cannot be predicted with certainty. Accruals for environmental remediation may change from time to time as new information about previously untested sites becomes known, and as environmental laws and regulations evolve and advances are made in environmental remediation technology. The accruals may also vary as the courts decide legal proceedings against outside parties responsible for contamination. These potential charges, which cannot be quantified at this time, are not expected to be material to CP’s financial position, but may materially affect income in the particular period in which a charge is recognized. Costs related to existing, but as yet unknown, or future contamination will be accrued in the period in which they become probable and reasonably estimable.
The expense included in “Purchased services and other” for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
was
$1 million
and
$2 million
, respectively (
three and six months ended
June 30, 2015
-
$3 million
and
$6 million
, respectively). Provisions for environmental remediation costs are recorded in “Other long-term liabilities”, except for the current portion which is recorded in “Accounts payable and accrued liabilities”. The total amount provided at
June 30, 2016
was
$86 million
(
December 31, 2015
-
$93 million
). Payments are expected to be made over
10 years
through 2026.
14
Condensed consolidating financial information
Canadian Pacific Railway Company, a 100%-owned subsidiary of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (“CPRL”), is the issuer of certain debt securities, which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CPRL. The following tables present condensed consolidating financial information (“CCFI”) in accordance with Rule 3-10(c) of Regulation S-X.
Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for under the equity method when presenting the CCFI.
The tables include all adjustments necessary to reconcile the CCFI on a consolidated basis to CPRL’s consolidated financial statements for the periods presented.
17
Interim Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
For the three months ended
June 30, 2016
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Revenues
Freight
$
—
$
1,007
$
399
$
—
$
1,406
Non-freight
—
33
98
(87
)
44
Total revenues
—
1,040
497
(87
)
1,450
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits
—
181
102
1
284
Fuel
—
103
28
—
131
Materials
—
27
8
3
38
Equipment rents
—
53
(9
)
—
44
Depreciation and amortization
—
107
54
—
161
Purchased services and other
—
193
139
(91
)
241
Total operating expenses
—
664
322
(87
)
899
Operating income
—
376
175
—
551
Less:
Other income and charges
(4
)
(12
)
7
—
(9
)
Net interest expense (income)
10
111
(6
)
—
115
(Loss) income before income tax expense and equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
(6
)
277
174
—
445
Less: Income tax (recovery) expense
(6
)
70
53
—
117
Add: Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
328
121
—
(449
)
—
Net income
$
328
$
328
$
121
$
(449
)
$
328
18
Interim Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
For the three months ended
June 30, 2015
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Revenues
Freight
$
—
$
1,131
$
479
$
—
$
1,610
Non-freight
—
34
90
(83
)
41
Total revenues
—
1,165
569
(83
)
1,651
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits
—
198
110
—
308
Fuel
—
134
51
—
185
Materials
—
35
10
—
45
Equipment rents
—
52
(6
)
—
46
Depreciation and amortization
—
102
43
—
145
Purchased services and other
—
192
167
(83
)
276
Total operating expenses
—
713
375
(83
)
1,005
Operating income
—
452
194
—
646
Less:
Other income and charges
(3
)
(8
)
6
—
(5
)
Net interest expense (income)
—
98
(14
)
—
84
Income before income tax expense and equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
3
362
202
—
567
Less: Income tax expense
2
93
82
—
177
Add: Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
389
120
—
(509
)
—
Net income
$
390
$
389
$
120
$
(509
)
$
390
19
Interim Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
For the six months ended June 30, 2016
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Revenues
Freight
$
—
$
2,104
$
850
$
—
$
2,954
Non-freight
—
66
194
(173
)
87
Total revenues
—
2,170
1,044
(173
)
3,041
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits
—
382
228
3
613
Fuel
—
206
50
—
256
Materials
—
65
18
11
94
Equipment rents
—
107
(18
)
—
89
Depreciation and amortization
—
214
109
—
323
Purchased services and other
—
329
320
(187
)
462
Total operating expenses
—
1,303
707
(173
)
1,837
Operating income
—
867
337
—
1,204
Less:
Other income and charges
(73
)
(150
)
33
—
(190
)
Net interest expense (income)
9
242
(12
)
—
239
Income before income tax expense and equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
64
775
316
—
1,155
Less: Income tax expense
3
181
103
—
287
Add: Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
807
213
—
(1,020
)
—
Net income
$
868
$
807
$
213
$
(1,020
)
$
868
20
Interim Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income
For the six months ended
June 30, 2015
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Revenues
Freight
$
—
$
2,250
$
990
$
—
$
3,240
Non-freight
—
63
179
(166
)
76
Total revenues
—
2,313
1,169
(166
)
3,316
Operating expenses
Compensation and benefits
—
460
226
—
686
Fuel
—
295
85
—
380
Materials
—
78
19
—
97
Equipment rents
—
88
—
—
88
Depreciation and amortization
—
204
87
—
291
Purchased services and other
—
334
348
(166
)
516
Total operating expenses
—
1,459
765
(166
)
2,058
Operating income
—
854
404
—
1,258
Less:
Other income and charges
15
78
(25
)
—
68
Net interest expense (income)
—
194
(25
)
—
169
(Loss) income before income tax expense and equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
(15
)
582
454
—
1,021
Less: Income tax (recovery) expense
(2
)
160
153
—
311
Add: Equity in net earnings of subsidiaries
723
301
—
(1,024
)
—
Net income
$
710
$
723
$
301
$
(1,024
)
$
710
21
Interim Condensed Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the three months ended
June 30, 2016
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Net income
$
328
$
328
$
121
$
(449
)
$
328
Net gain (loss) in foreign currency translation
adjustments, net of hedging activities
—
20
(17
)
—
3
Change in derivatives designated as cash flow
hedges
—
(29
)
—
—
(29
)
Change in pension and post-retirement defined
benefit plans
—
41
2
—
43
Other comprehensive income (loss) before
income taxes
—
32
(15
)
—
17
Income tax expense on above items
—
(5
)
(2
)
—
(7
)
Equity accounted investments
10
(17
)
—
7
—
Other comprehensive income (loss)
10
10
(17
)
7
10
Comprehensive income
$
338
$
338
$
104
$
(442
)
$
338
Interim Condensed Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the three months ended
June 30, 2015
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Net income
$
390
$
389
$
120
$
(509
)
$
390
Net gain (loss) in foreign currency translation
adjustments, net of hedging activities
—
59
(52
)
—
7
Change in derivatives designated as cash flow
hedges
—
36
—
—
36
Change in pension and post-retirement defined benefit plans
—
64
2
—
66
Other comprehensive income (loss) before
income taxes
—
159
(50
)
—
109
Income tax (expense) recovery on above items
—
(55
)
20
—
(35
)
Equity accounted investments
74
(30
)
—
(44
)
—
Other comprehensive income (loss)
74
74
(30
)
(44
)
74
Comprehensive income
$
464
$
463
$
90
$
(553
)
$
464
22
Interim Condensed Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the six months ended June 30, 2016
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Net income
$
868
$
807
$
213
$
(1,020
)
$
868
Net gain (loss) in foreign currency translation
adjustments, net of hedging activities
—
330
(290
)
—
40
Change in derivatives designated as cash flow
hedges
—
(76
)
—
—
(76
)
Change in pension and post-retirement defined
benefit plans
—
86
4
—
90
Other comprehensive income (loss) before
income taxes
—
340
(286
)
—
54
Income tax expense on above items
—
(46
)
(2
)
—
(48
)
Equity accounted investments
6
(288
)
—
282
—
Other comprehensive income (loss)
6
6
(288
)
282
6
Comprehensive income (loss)
$
874
$
813
$
(75
)
$
(738
)
$
874
Interim Condensed Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the six months ended
June 30, 2015
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Net income
$
710
$
723
$
301
$
(1,024
)
$
710
Net (loss) gain in foreign currency translation
adjustments, net of hedging activities
—
(298
)
268
—
(30
)
Change in derivatives designated as cash flow
hedges
—
(33
)
—
—
(33
)
Change in pension and post-retirement defined benefit plans
—
134
4
—
138
Other comprehensive (loss) income before
income taxes
—
(197
)
272
—
75
Income tax recovery (expense) on above items
—
13
(2
)
—
11
Equity accounted investments
86
270
—
(356
)
—
Other comprehensive income
86
86
270
(356
)
86
Comprehensive income
$
796
$
809
$
571
$
(1,380
)
$
796
23
Interim Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
As at
June 30, 2016
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
—
$
47
$
45
$
—
$
92
Accounts receivable, net
—
406
171
—
577
Accounts receivable, inter-company
78
80
159
(317
)
—
Short-term advances to affiliates
—
470
3,758
(4,228
)
—
Materials and supplies
—
164
31
—
195
Other current assets
—
49
10
—
59
78
1,216
4,174
(4,545
)
923
Long-term advances to affiliates
501
—
88
(589
)
—
Investments
—
26
129
—
155
Investments in subsidiaries
8,217
9,753
—
(17,970
)
—
Properties
—
8,560
7,600
—
16,160
Goodwill and intangible assets
—
—
195
—
195
Pension asset
—
1,565
—
—
1,565
Other assets
—
50
20
—
70
Deferred income taxes
14
—
—
(14
)
—
Total assets
$
8,810
$
21,170
$
12,206
$
(23,118
)
$
19,068
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$
156
$
804
$
287
$
—
$
1,247
Accounts payable, inter-company
3
235
79
(317
)
—
Short-term advances from affiliates
3,960
247
21
(4,228
)
—
Long-term debt maturing within one year
—
198
—
—
198
4,119
1,484
387
(4,545
)
1,445
Pension and other benefit liabilities
—
675
76
—
751
Long-term advances from affiliates
—
589
—
(589
)
—
Other long-term liabilities
—
159
127
—
286
Long-term debt
—
8,323
60
—
8,383
Deferred income taxes
—
1,723
1,803
(14
)
3,512
Total liabilities
4,119
12,953
2,453
(5,148
)
14,377
Shareholders’ equity
Share capital
2,000
1,037
5,808
(6,845
)
2,000
Additional paid-in capital
49
1,630
418
(2,048
)
49
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
(1,471
)
(1,471
)
548
923
(1,471
)
Retained earnings
4,113
7,021
2,979
(10,000
)
4,113
4,691
8,217
9,753
(17,970
)
4,691
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
8,810
$
21,170
$
12,206
$
(23,118
)
$
19,068
24
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
As at
December 31, 2015
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
—
$
502
$
148
$
—
$
650
Accounts receivable, net
—
452
193
—
645
Accounts receivable, inter-company
59
105
265
(429
)
—
Short-term advances to affiliates
—
75
3,483
(3,558
)
—
Materials and supplies
—
154
34
—
188
Other current assets
—
37
17
—
54
59
1,325
4,140
(3,987
)
1,537
Long-term advances to affiliates
501
207
376
(1,084
)
—
Investments
—
22
130
—
152
Investments in subsidiaries
7,518
9,832
—
(17,350
)
—
Properties
—
8,481
7,792
—
16,273
Goodwill and intangible assets
—
3
208
—
211
Pension asset
—
1,401
—
—
1,401
Other assets
—
55
8
—
63
Deferred income taxes
25
—
—
(25
)
—
Total assets
$
8,103
$
21,326
$
12,654
$
(22,446
)
$
19,637
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$
54
$
1,122
$
241
$
—
$
1,417
Accounts payable, inter-company
—
325
104
(429
)
—
Short-term advances from affiliates
3,253
230
75
(3,558
)
—
Long-term debt maturing within one year
—
24
6
—
30
3,307
1,701
426
(3,987
)
1,447
Pension and other benefit liabilities
—
676
82
—
758
Long-term advances from affiliates
—
877
207
(1,084
)
—
Other long-term liabilities
—
186
132
—
318
Long-term debt
—
8,863
64
—
8,927
Deferred income taxes
—
1,505
1,911
(25
)
3,391
Total liabilities
3,307
13,808
2,822
(5,096
)
14,841
Shareholders’ equity
Share capital
2,058
1,037
5,465
(6,502
)
2,058
Additional paid-in capital
43
1,568
613
(2,181
)
43
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
(1,477
)
(1,477
)
840
637
(1,477
)
Retained earnings
4,172
6,390
2,914
(9,304
)
4,172
4,796
7,518
9,832
(17,350
)
4,796
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
8,103
$
21,326
$
12,654
$
(22,446
)
$
19,637
25
Interim Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the three months ended
June 30, 2016
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Cash provided by operating activities
$
75
$
374
$
219
$
(156
)
$
512
Investing activities
Additions to properties
—
(206
)
(124
)
—
(330
)
Proceeds from sale of properties and other assets
—
11
—
—
11
Advances to affiliates
—
(482
)
(285
)
767
—
Repayment of advances to affiliates
—
208
—
(208
)
—
Capital contributions to affiliates
—
(348
)
—
348
—
Other
—
—
(2
)
—
(2
)
Cash used in investing activities
—
(817
)
(411
)
907
(321
)
Financing activities
Dividends paid
(53
)
(53
)
(103
)
156
(53
)
Issuance of share capital
—
—
348
(348
)
—
Issuance of CP Common Shares
4
—
—
—
4
Purchase of CP Common Shares
(788
)
—
—
—
(788
)
Repayment of long-term debt, excluding commercial paper
—
(7
)
—
—
(7
)
Net issuance of commercial paper
—
176
—
—
176
Advances from affiliates
762
—
5
(767
)
—
Repayment of advances from affiliates
—
—
(208
)
208
—
Other financing activities
—
(1
)
—
—
(1
)
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(75
)
115
42
(751
)
(669
)
Effect of foreign currency fluctuations on U.S. dollar-denominated cash and cash equivalents
—
(1
)
—
—
(1
)
Cash position
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
—
(329
)
(150
)
—
(479
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
—
376
195
—
571
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
—
$
47
$
45
$
—
$
92
26
Interim Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the three months ended
June 30, 2015
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Cash provided by operating activities
$
59
$
525
$
143
$
(142
)
$
585
Investing activities
Additions to properties
—
(210
)
(145
)
—
(355
)
Proceeds from sale of properties and other assets
—
8
—
—
8
Advances to affiliates
(500
)
(633
)
(500
)
1,633
—
Capital contributions to affiliates
—
(500
)
—
500
—
Other
—
(6
)
(1
)
—
(7
)
Cash used in investing activities
(500
)
(1,341
)
(646
)
2,133
(354
)
Financing activities
Dividends paid
(57
)
(57
)
(85
)
142
(57
)
Issuance of share capital
—
—
500
(500
)
—
Issuance of CP Common Shares
11
—
—
—
11
Purchase of CP Common Shares
(543
)
—
—
—
(543
)
Repayment of long-term debt, excluding commercial paper
—
(9
)
—
—
(9
)
Net issuance of commercial paper
—
369
—
—
369
Advances from affiliates
1,030
500
103
(1,633
)
—
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
441
803
518
(1,991
)
(229
)
Effect of foreign currency fluctuations on U.S. dollar-denominated cash and cash equivalents
—
(1
)
—
—
(1
)
Cash position
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
—
(14
)
15
—
1
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
—
153
31
—
184
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
—
$
139
$
46
$
—
$
185
27
Interim Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2016
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Cash provided by operating activities
$
98
$
425
$
417
$
(210
)
$
730
Investing activities
Additions to properties
—
(338
)
(270
)
—
(608
)
Proceeds from sale of properties and other assets
—
68
3
—
71
Advances to affiliates
—
(517
)
(285
)
802
—
Repayment of advances to affiliates
—
208
—
(208
)
—
Capital contributions to affiliates
—
(357
)
—
357
—
Repurchase of share capital from affiliates
—
6
—
(6
)
—
Other
—
—
(2
)
—
(2
)
Cash used in investing activities
—
(930
)
(554
)
945
(539
)
Financing activities
Dividends paid
(107
)
(107
)
(103
)
210
(107
)
Return of share capital to affiliates
—
—
(6
)
6
—
Issuance of share capital
—
—
357
(357
)
—
Issuance of CP Common Shares
9
—
—
—
9
Purchase of CP Common Shares
(788
)
—
—
—
(788
)
Repayment of long-term debt, excluding commercial paper
—
(11
)
(7
)
—
(18
)
Net issuance of commercial paper
—
176
—
—
176
Advances from affiliates
788
—
14
(802
)
—
Repayment of advances from affiliates
—
—
(208
)
208
—
Other financing activities
—
(3
)
—
—
(3
)
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(98
)
55
47
(735
)
(731
)
Effect of foreign currency fluctuations on U.S. dollar-denominated cash and cash equivalents
—
(5
)
(13
)
—
(18
)
Cash position
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
—
(455
)
(103
)
—
(558
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
—
502
148
—
650
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
—
$
47
$
45
$
—
$
92
28
Interim Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the six months ended
June 30, 2015
(in millions of Canadian dollars)
CPRL (Parent Guarantor)
CPRC (Subsidiary Issuer)
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
Consolidating Adjustments and Eliminations
CPRL Consolidated
Cash provided by operating activities
$
115
$
824
$
416
$
(215
)
$
1,140
Investing activities
Additions to properties
—
(303
)
(315
)
—
(618
)
Proceeds from sale of properties and other assets
—
59
1
—
60
Advances to affiliates
(500
)
(936
)
(729
)
2,165
—
Capital contributions to affiliates
—
(617
)
—
617
—
Other
—
14
(1
)
—
13
Cash used in investing activities
(500
)
(1,783
)
(1,044
)
2,782
(545
)
Financing activities
Dividends paid
(115
)
(115
)
(100
)
215
(115
)
Issuance of share capital
—
—
617
(617
)
—
Issuance of CP Common Shares
27
—
—
—
27
Purchase of CP Common Shares
(1,072
)
—
—
—
(1,072
)
Issuance of long-term debt, excluding commercial paper
—
810
—
—
810
Repayment of long-term debt, excluding commercial paper
—
(24
)
(43
)
—
(67
)
Net repayment of commercial paper
—
(224
)
—
—
(224
)
Advances from affiliates
1,545
500
120
(2,165
)
—
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
385
947
594
(2,567
)
(641
)
Effect of foreign currency fluctuations on U.S. dollar-denominated cash and cash equivalents
—
(1
)
6
—
5
Cash position
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
—
(13
)
(28
)
—
(41
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
—
152
74
—
226
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
—
$
139
$
46
$
—
$
185
29
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes for the
three and six
months ended
June 30, 2016
in Item 1. Financial Statements, and other information in this report. Except where otherwise indicated, all financial information reflected herein is expressed in Canadian dollars.
For purposes of this report, all references herein to “CP,” “the Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to CPRL, CPRL and its subsidiaries, CPRL and one or more of its subsidiaries, or one or more of CPRL's subsidiaries, as the context may require.
Available Information
CP makes available on or through its website
www.cpr.ca
free of charge, its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Also, filings made pursuant to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) with the SEC by our executive officers, directors and other reporting persons with respect to the Company's Common Shares are made available free of charge, through our website. Our website also contains charters for each of the committees of our Board of Directors, our corporate governance guidelines and our Code of Business Ethics. SEC filings made by CP are also accessible through the SEC’s website at
www.sec.gov
.
The information on our website is not part of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
The Company has included the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) certifications regarding the Company's public disclosure required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as an Exhibit to this report.
Executive Summary
Second Quarter
of
2016
Results
Financial Performance -
In the
second quarter
of
2016
, CP reported Diluted earnings per share ("EPS") of
$2.15
and Adjusted diluted EPS of
$2.05
, down
9%
and
16%
respectively, due in large part to a 12% drop in revenues. Revenue challenges in the quarter included lower-than-anticipated bulk volumes, devastating wildfires in northern Alberta and a strengthening Canadian dollar. The Company took action to adapt its cost structure as quickly as possible, but it was not able to fully mitigate the precipitous volume decline; as a result,
second quarter
operating ratio was up
110
basis points to
62.0%
. Adjusted diluted EPS is defined and reconciled in Non-GAAP Measures and discussed further in Results of Operations of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Operating performance
- CP’s continued focus on asset utilization and network investments resulted in improvements to a number of CP’s key operating metrics. The following metrics are discussed further in Performance Indicators of this Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
•
Average train speed increased by
11
% to
24.1
miles per hour;
•
Average train weight increased by
3
% to
8,540
tons;
•
Average train length increased by
4
% to
7,275
feet; and
•
Average terminal dwell time improved by
3
% to
6.5
hours.
Recent Developments
•
On April 20, 2016, CP announced a new normal course issuer bid ("NCIB") to repurchase, for cancellation, up to 6.91 million of its Common Shares, which received Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") approval on April 28, 2016. As at June 30, 2016, CP had repurchased 5.13 million shares under the NCIB.
•
Also on April 20, 2016, CP announced an increase to the Company's quarterly dividend to $0.50 per share from $0.35 per share.
•
On April 20, 2016, the Company announced that Mr. Robert Johnson was appointed Executive Vice-President, Operations.
•
On July 19, 2016, Dr. Anthony R. Melman resigned as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.
30
Performance Indicators
The following table lists the key measures of the Company’s operating performance:
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
(1)
% Change
2016
2015
(1)
% Change
Operations Performance
Gross ton-miles (“GTMs”) (millions)
57,460
66,598
(14
)
119,432
132,682
(10
)
Train miles (thousands)
7,291
8,705
(16
)
15,155
17,340
(13
)
Average train weight – excluding local traffic (tons)
8,540
8,253
3
8,518
8,218
4
Average train length – excluding local traffic (feet)
7,275
6,989
4
7,188
6,881
4
Average terminal dwell (hours)
6.5
6.7
(3
)
6.7
8.6
(22
)
Average train speed (mph)
24.1
21.7
11
23.7
20.5
16
Fuel efficiency (U.S. gallons of locomotive fuel consumed / 1,000 GTMs)
0.979
0.993
(1
)
0.989
1.020
(3
)
Total employees (average)
12,341
14,195
(13
)
12,387
14,280
(13
)
Total employees (end of period)
11,988
14,071
(15
)
11,988
14,071
(15
)
Workforce (end of period)
12,033
14,128
(15
)
12,033
14,128
(15
)
Safety Indicators
FRA personal injuries per 200,000 employee-hours
1.30
1.44
(10
)
1.37
1.74
(21
)
FRA train accidents per million train miles
0.50
1.35
(63
)
0.72
1.41
(49
)
(1)
Certain figures have been revised to conform with current presentation or have been updated to reflect new information.
Operations Performance
Three months ended
June 30, 2016
compared to the
three months ended
June 30, 2015
•
GTMs
are defined as the movement of total train weight over a distance of one mile. Total train weight comprises the weight of the freight cars, their contents, and any inactive locomotives. An increase in GTMs indicates additional workload. GTMs for the
second quarter
of
2016
were
57,460 million
,
a decrease
of
14%
compared with
66,598 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to a drop in volumes in the Crude, Potash and Canadian Grain lines of business.
•
Train miles
decreased
by
16%
for the
second quarter
of
2016
compared to the same period of
2015
. This reflects the impact of lower volumes and continuous improvements in operating efficiency from longer, heavier trains.
•
The
average train weight
is defined as the average gross weight of CP trains, both loaded and empty. This excludes trains in short-haul service, work trains used to move CP’s track equipment and materials, and the haulage of other railways’ trains on CP’s network. Average train weight
increased
by
3%
for the
second quarter
of
2016
compared to the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was due to improvements made in operating plan efficiency.
•
The
average train length
is defined as the sum of each car length multiplied by the distance travelled, divided by train miles. Local trains are excluded from this measure. Average train length
increased
by
4
% for the
second quarter
of
2016
compared to the same period of
2015
. Similar to benefits to the average train weight, this was also due to improvements made in operating plan efficiency.
•
The
average terminal dwell
is defined as the average time a freight car resides within terminal boundaries expressed in hours. The timing starts with a train arriving in the terminal, a customer releasing the car to the Company, or a car arriving at interchange from another railway. The timing ends when the train leaves, a customer receives the car from CP, or the freight car is transferred to another railway. Freight cars are excluded if they are being stored at the terminal or used in track repairs. Average terminal dwell
decreased
by
3
% in the
second quarter
of
2016
compared to the same period of
2015
. This favourable
decrease
was primarily due to continued improvements in yard operating performance.
•
The
average train speed
is defined as a measure of the line-haul movement from origin to destination including terminal dwell hours. It is calculated by dividing the total train miles travelled by the total train hours operated. This calculation does not include delay time related to customer or foreign railways and excludes the time and distance travelled by: i) trains used in or around CP’s yards; ii) passenger trains; and iii) trains used for repairing track. Average train speed
increased
by
11
% in the
second quarter
of
2016
compared to the same period of
2015
. This favourable
increase
was primarily due to improved train design and operating plan execution.
31
•
Fuel efficiency
improved by
1
% in the
second quarter
of
2016
compared to the same period of
2015
. Improvements in fuel efficiency were a result of increased locomotive productivity, operational fluidity and execution of the Company's fuel conservation strategies.
Six months ended
June 30, 2016
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
•
GTMs
for the first six months
of
2016
were
119,432 million
,
a decrease
of
10
% compared with
132,682 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to a drop in volumes in the Crude, Export Potash and Coal lines of business.
•
Train miles
decreased
by
13
% for the
first six months
of
2016
compared to the same period of
2015
. This reflects the impact of lower volumes and continuous improvements in operating efficiency from longer, heavier trains.
•
Average train weight
increased
by
4
% for the
first six months
of
2016
compared to the same period of
2015
. This increase was due to improvements made in operating plan efficiency.
•
Average train length
increased
by
4
% for the
first six months
of
2016
from the same period of
2015
. This favourable increase was also due to improvements made in operating plan efficiency.
•
Average terminal dwell
decreased
by
22
% in the
first six months
of
2016
compared to the same period of
2015
. This favourable
decrease
was primarily due to continued improvements in yard operating performance.
•
Average train speed
increased
by
16
% in the
first six months
of
2016
compared to the same period of
2015
. This favourable
increase
was primarily due to improved train design and operating plan execution.
•
Fuel efficiency
improved by
3
% in the
first six months
of
2016
compared to the same period of
2015
. Improvements in fuel efficiency were a result of increased locomotive productivity, operational fluidity and execution of the Company's fuel conservation strategies.
Total Employees and Workforce
An employee is defined by the Company as an individual currently engaged in full-time or part-time employment with CP. Employees could be engaged in a full-time, part-time or seasonal capacity. The average number of total employees
decreased
by
13
% in the
second quarter
and
first six months
of
2016
, compared to the same periods of
2015
. This reduction was primarily due to lower volumes, improved operational efficiency and natural attrition.
The Company's workforce is defined as total employees, plus contractors and consultants. The Company's reduction of total workforce during 2016 has been consistent with the reduction in the number of total employees. As at
June 30, 2016
, the total workforce was
12,033
, a decrease of 866 or 7%, when compared to 12,899 as at December 31, 2015. As at June 30, 2016, the total workforce
decreased
by 2,095 compared to June 30, 2015.
Safety Indicators
Safety is a key priority and core strategy for CP’s management, employees and Board of Directors. The Company’s two main safety indicators – personal injuries and train accidents – follow strict U.S. Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”) reporting guidelines.
The FRA personal injury rate per 200,000 employee-hours is the number of personal injuries multiplied by 200,000 and divided by total employee hours. Personal injuries are defined as injuries that require employees to lose time away from work, modify their normal duties or obtain medical treatment beyond minor first aid. FRA employee-hours are the total hours worked, excluding vacation and sick time, by all employees, excluding contractors. The FRA personal injury rate per 200,000 employee-hours for CP was
1.30
in the
second quarter
of
2016
, down from
1.44
in the same period of
2015
. For the
first six months
of
2016
, the FRA personal injury rate per 200,000 employee-hours for CP was
1.37
, down from
1.74
in the same period of
2015
. The FRA train accidents per million train miles was
0.50
in the
second quarter
of
2016
, a decrease from
1.35
in the same period of
2015
. For the
first six months
of
2016
, FRA train accidents per million train miles was
0.72
, a decrease from
1.41
in the same period of
2015
.
32
Financial Highlights
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
(in millions, except per share data, percentages and ratios)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Financial Performance
Revenues
$
1,450
$
1,651
$
3,041
$
3,316
Operating income
551
646
1,204
1,258
Net income
328
390
868
710
Adjusted income
(1)
312
404
696
779
Basic earnings per share
2.16
2.38
5.70
4.32
Diluted earnings per share
2.15
2.36
5.67
4.28
Adjusted diluted earnings per share
(1)
2.05
2.45
4.55
4.70
Dividends declared per share
0.50
0.35
0.85
0.70
Cash provided by operating activities
512
585
730
1,140
Free cash
(1)
137
173
66
485
Operating ratio
(2)
62.0
%
60.9
%
60.4
%
62.1
%
As at June 30, 2016
As at December 31, 2015
Financial Position
Total assets
$
19,068
$
19,637
Total long-term obligations
(3)
8,460
9,012
Shareholders’ equity
4,691
4,796
For the twelve months ended June 30
2016
2015
Financial Ratios
Return on invested capital ("ROIC")
(1)
14.7
%
15.0
%
Adjusted ROIC
(1)
14.9
%
15.7
%
(1)
These measures have no standardized meanings prescribed by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. These measures are defined and reconciled in Non-GAAP Measures of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
(2)
Operating ratio is defined as operating expenses divided by revenues, further discussed in Results of Operations of this Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
(3)
Excludes deferred income taxes: $3,512 million and $3,391 million; and other non-financial deferred liabilities of $960 and $991 million at
June 30, 2016
and
December 31, 2015
, respectively.
Results of Operations
Three months ended
June 30, 2016
compared to the
three months ended
June 30, 2015
Income
Operating income was $
551 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
95 million
, or
15
%, from $
646 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to lower volumes. The northern Alberta wildfires contributed to an estimated $29M decline in Operating income with a significant decrease in volumes, in addition to negatively impacting fuel input costs without triggering a commensurate offsetting impact to benchmark fuel recovery prices. Operating income for the
second quarter
of
2016
was also negatively impacted by the timing effect of the customary lag in adjustments to fuel surcharge program in periods of significant fuel price changes.
This
decrease
in operating income was partially offset by:
•
efficiencies generated from improved operating performance and asset utilization;
•
higher defined benefit pension plan income of $22 million; and
•
the favourable impact of the change in foreign exchange (“FX”) of $17 million.
Net income was $
328 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
62 million
, or
16
%, from $
390 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to lower Operating income and higher interest expense on new debt issued in 2015. This was partially offset by a decrease in Income tax expense due to lower taxable earnings along with a lower effective tax rate compared to 2015 and the
favourable
impact of FX translation on U.S. dollar-denominated debt.
33
Adjusted income, defined and reconciled in Non-GAAP Measures of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, was $
312 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
92 million
, or
23
%, from $
404 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was due to the same factors discussed above for the
decrease
in Net income, except that Adjusted income excluded the
favourable
impact of FX translation on U.S. dollar-denominated debt.
Diluted Earnings per Share
Diluted earnings per share was $
2.15
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
0.21
, or
9
% from $
2.36
in the same period of
2015
. Adjusted diluted EPS, defined and reconciled in Non-GAAP Measures of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, was $
2.05
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
0.40
, or
16
%, from $
2.45
in the same period of
2015
. These decreases were primarily due to lower Net income and Adjusted income, respectively, partially offset by lower average outstanding shares due to the Company’s share repurchase program.
Operating Ratio
The Operating ratio provides the percentage of revenues used to operate the railway. A lower percentage normally indicates higher efficiency in the operation of the railway. The Company’s Operating ratio was
62.0%
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
110
basis point
higher
from
60.9%
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to lower volumes, partially offset by efficiencies generated from improved operating performance and asset utilization, and higher defined benefit pension plan income.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
ROIC is a measure of how productively the Company uses its long-term capital investments, representing critical indicators of good operating and investment decisions made by management, and is an important performance criteria in determining certain elements of the Company's long-term incentive plan. ROIC was
14.7%
for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2016
, a
30
basis point
decrease
compared to
15.0%
for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2015
. Adjusted ROIC was
14.9%
for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2016
, an
80
basis point
decrease
compared to
15.7%
for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2015
. These
decrease
s were largely due to lower volumes experienced during 2016. ROIC and Adjusted ROIC are defined and reconciled in Non-GAAP Measures of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Six months ended
June 30, 2016
compared to the
six months ended
June 30, 2015
Income
Operating income was $
1,204 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
54 million
, or
4
%, from $
1,258 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to lower volumes and higher wage and benefit inflation of 3%. The northern Alberta wildfires contributed to the significant decrease in volumes, in addition to negatively impacting fuel input costs without a commensurate impact to benchmark fuel recovery prices. This
decrease
was partially offset by:
•
efficiencies generated from improved operating performance and asset utilization;
•
the favourable impact of the change in FX of $71 million;
•
higher defined benefit pension plan income of $55 million; and
•
lower casualty expense of $12 million (excluding an unfavourable FX impact of $2 million).
Net income was $
868 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
an increase
of $
158 million
, or
22
%, from $
710 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to the favourable impact of FX translation on U.S. dollar-denominated debt and a decrease in Income tax expense due to lower taxable earnings along with lower effective tax rate compared to 2015. This
increase
was partially offset by lower operating income and higher interest expense on new debt issued in 2015.
Adjusted income, defined and reconciled in Non-GAAP Measures of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, was $
696 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
83 million
, or
11
%, from $
779 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was due to the factors discussed above for Operating income and Net income, excluding the
favourable
impact of FX translation on U.S. dollar-denominated debt.
Diluted Earnings per Share
Diluted earnings per share was $
5.67
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
an increase
of $
1.39
, or
32
% from $
4.28
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to higher Net income and lower average outstanding shares due to the Company’s share repurchase program.
Adjusted diluted EPS was $
4.55
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
0.15
, or
3
%, from $
4.70
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to lower Adjusted income, which excludes the gain on FX translation on U.S. dollar-denominated debt, partially offset by lower average outstanding shares due to the Company’s share repurchase program.
34
Operating Ratio
The Company’s Operating ratio was
60.4%
in the
first six months
of
2016
, a
170
basis point
improvement
from
62.1%
in the same period of
2015
. This
improvement
was primarily due to efficiencies generated from improved operating performance and asset utilization, and higher defined benefit pension plan income. This
improvement
was partially offset by lower volumes.
Impact of FX on Earnings
Fluctuations in FX affect the Company’s results because U.S. dollar-denominated revenues and expenses are translated into Canadian dollars. U.S. dollar-denominated revenues and expenses increase (decrease) when the Canadian dollar weakens (strengthens) in relation to the U.S. dollar. The following tables indicate the average and periodic exchange rates when converting U.S. dollars to Canadian dollars for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
and the comparative periods in
2015
.
Canadian to U.S. dollar
Average exchange rates
2016
2015
For the three months ended – June 30
$
1.29
$
1.23
For the six months ended – June 30
$
1.34
$
1.23
Canadian to U.S. dollar
Exchange rates
2016
2015
Beginning of year – January 1
$
1.38
$
1.16
Beginning of quarter – April 1
$
1.30
$
1.27
End of quarter – June 30
$
1.29
$
1.25
In the
second quarter
of
2016
, the impact of a
stronger U.S. dollar
resulted in an
increase
in total revenues of
$40 million
, an
increase
in total operating expenses of
$23 million
and an
increase
in interest expense of $3 million from the same period in
2015
.
Similarly, in the
first six months
of
2016
, the impact of a
stronger U.S. dollar
resulted in an
increase
in total revenues of
$148 million
, an
increase
in total operating expenses of
$77 million
and an
increase
in interest expense of $10 million from the same period in
2015
.
The impact of FX on total revenues and operating expenses is discussed further in Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, Foreign Exchange Risk.
Impact of Fuel Price on Earnings
Fluctuations in fuel prices affect the Company’s results because fuel expense constitutes a significant portion of CP's operating costs. As fuel prices fluctuate, there will be a timing impact on earnings. The following table indicates the average fuel price for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
and the comparative periods in
2015
.
Average Fuel Price
(U.S. dollars per U.S. gallon)
2016
2015
For the three months ended – June 30
$
1.82
$
2.30
For the six months ended – June 30
$
1.64
$
2.31
In the
second quarter
of
2016
, the impact of
lower
fuel prices resulted in a
decrease
in total revenues of $53 million and a
decrease
in total operating expenses of $33 million from the same period in
2015
. The results of the
second quarter
of
2016
were negatively impacted by the timing effect of the customary lag in adjustments to fuel recovery prices in periods of significant fuel price changes. A portion of the adverse impact, however, is not attributable to timing, as the wildfires in northern Alberta negatively impacted fuel input costs by an estimated $9 million without triggering a commensurate offsetting impact to benchmark fuel recovery prices.
Similarly, in the
first six months
of
2016
, the impact of
lower
fuel prices resulted in a
decrease
in total revenues of $135 million and a
decrease
in total operating expenses of $100 million from the same period in
2015
.
35
Impact of Share Price on Earnings
Fluctuations in the Common Share price affect the Company's operating expenses because share-based liabilities are fair valued. The following tables indicate the opening and closing CP Common Share Price on the TSX and the New York Stock Exchange for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
and the comparative periods in
2015
.
CP Common Share Price
Toronto Stock Exchange (in Canadian dollars)
2016
2015
Opening Common Share Price, as at January 1
$
176.73
$
223.75
Ending Common Share Price, as at March 31
$
172.55
$
231.90
Ending Common Share Price, as at June 30
$
166.33
$
200.02
Change in Common Share Price for the three months ended June 30
$
(6.22
)
$
(31.88
)
Change in Common Share Price for the six months ended June 30
$
(10.40
)
$
(23.73
)
CP Common Share Price
New York Stock Exchange (in U.S. dollars)
2016
2015
Opening Common Share Price, as at January 1
$
127.60
$
192.69
Ending Common Share Price, as at March 31
$
132.69
$
182.70
Ending Common Share Price, as at June 30
$
128.79
$
160.23
Change in Common Share Price for the three months ended June 30
$
(3.90
)
$
(22.47
)
Change in Common Share Price for the six months ended June 30
$
1.19
$
(32.46
)
In the
second quarter
of
2016
, the impact of the change in Common Share price resulted in a decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $3 million compared to a decrease of $25 million in the same period in
2015
.
In the
first six months
of
2016
, the impact of the change in Common Share price resulted in a decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $5 million compared to a decrease of $18 million in the same period in
2015
.
The impact of share price on stock-based compensation is discussed further in Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, Share Price Impact on Stock-Based Compensation.
Operating Revenues
The Company’s revenues are primarily derived from transporting freight. Non-freight revenue is generated from leasing of certain assets, contracts with passenger service operators, switching fees, transload activities and logistical management services. Changes in freight volumes generally contribute to corresponding changes in freight revenues and certain variable expenses, such as fuel, equipment rents and crew costs.
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(2)
Freight revenues (in millions)
(1)
$
1,406
$
1,610
(13
)
$
(204
)
$
40
Non-freight revenues (in millions)
44
41
7
3
—
Total revenues (in millions)
$
1,450
$
1,651
(12
)
$
(201
)
$
40
Carloads (in thousands)
614
668
(8
)
(54
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
32,091
36,281
(12
)
(4,190
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
2,291
$
2,409
(5
)
$
(118
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-miles (cents)
4.38
4.44
(1
)
(0.06
)
(1)
Freight revenues include fuel surcharge revenues of $20 million in 2016, and $73 million in 2015.
(2)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
•
Freight revenues
were
$1,406 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$204 million
, or
13
% from
$1,610 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to an overall decline in volumes. In particular, there was an estimated $20 million decline in revenues as a direct result of the northern Alberta wildfires. Additionally, revenues from other freight activities declined by $30 million primarily due to reductions in haulage and ancillary revenues. Lower fuel prices also reduced fuel surcharge revenue by $53 million. The favourable impact of the change in FX of
$40 million
partially offset these
decrease
s.
36
•
RTMs
are defined as the movement of one revenue-producing ton of freight over a distance of one mile. RTMs measure the relative weight and distance of rail freight moved by the Company. RTMs for the
second quarter
of
2016
were
32,091 million
,
a decrease
of
12%
compared with
36,281 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to a drop in volumes in the Crude, Potash and Canadian Grain lines of business. Increased shipments in the Forest Products line of business partially offset the
decrease
in RTMs.
•
Non-freight revenues
were $
44 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
an increase
of $
3 million
, or
7
% from $
41 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to higher revenues from logistics services and transload revenues following the acquisition of Steelcare Inc. in the third quarter of 2015.
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(2)
Freight revenues (in millions)
(1)
$
2,954
$
3,240
(9
)
$
(286
)
$
147
Non-freight revenues (in millions)
87
76
14
11
1
Total revenues (in millions)
$
3,041
$
3,316
(8
)
$
(275
)
$
148
Carloads (in thousands)
1,228
1,310
(6
)
(82
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
66,426
72,344
(8
)
(5,918
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
2,405
$
2,473
(3
)
$
(68
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-miles (cents)
4.45
4.48
(1
)
(0.03
)
(1)
Freight revenues include fuel surcharge revenues of $42 million in 2016, and $177 million in 2015.
(2)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
•
Freight revenues
were
$2,954 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$286 million
, or
9
% from
$3,240 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to an overall decline in volumes and the impact of lower fuel prices on fuel surcharge revenue of $135 million. The favourable impact of the change in FX of
$147 million
partially offset this
decrease
.
•
RTMs
for the first six months
of
2016
were
66,426 million
,
a decrease
of
8
% compared with
72,344 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to a drop in volumes in the Crude, Potash, Coal and Metals, Minerals & Consumer Products lines of business.
•
Non-freight revenues
were $
87 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
an increase
of $
11 million
, or
14
% from $
76 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to higher transload revenues following the acquisition of Steelcare Inc. in the third quarter of 2015, and from logistics services and leasing revenues.
Lines of Business
Canadian Grain
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
201
$
255
(21
)
$
(54
)
$
3
Carloads (in thousands)
64
72
(11
)
(8
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
5,727
6,622
(14
)
(895
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
3,153
$
3,546
(11
)
$
(393
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
3.51
3.86
(9
)
(0.35
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Canadian grain revenue was
$201 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$54 million
, or
21%
from
$255 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to a decline in volumes and lower freight rates that reflect the decrease in the Maximum Revenue Entitlement for Canadian regulated grain in crop year 2015/2016. The favourable impact of the change in FX partially offset this
decrease
.
37
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
455
$
511
(11
)
$
(56
)
$
11
Carloads (in thousands)
130
133
(2
)
(3
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
12,668
13,027
(3
)
(359
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
3,513
$
3,852
(9
)
$
(339
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
3.60
3.92
(8
)
(0.32
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Canadian grain revenue was
$455 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$56 million
, or
11%
from
$511 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to lower freight rates that reflect the decrease in the Maximum Revenue Entitlement for Canadian regulated grain in crop year 2015/2016 and a decline in volumes. This
decrease
was partially offset by the
favourable
impact of the change in FX.
U.S. Grain
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
101
$
106
(5
)
$
(5
)
$
5
Carloads (in thousands)
35
33
6
2
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
2,242
2,184
3
58
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
2,946
$
3,187
(8
)
$
(241
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
4.51
4.85
(7
)
(0.34
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
U.S. grain revenue was
$101 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$5 million
, or
5%
from
$106 million
in the same period of
2015
. The
decrease
was primarily due to lower freight rates and lower fuel surcharge revenue, partially offset by the
favourable
impact of the change in FX and higher volumes.
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
214
$
243
(12
)
$
(29
)
$
22
Carloads (in thousands)
69
73
(5
)
(4
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
4,556
5,128
(11
)
(572
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
3,109
$
3,308
(6
)
$
(199
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
4.71
4.74
(1
)
(0.03
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
U.S. grain revenue was
$214 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$29 million
, or
12%
from
$243 million
in the same period of
2015
. The
decrease
was primarily due to a decline in volumes and lower fuel surcharge revenue. The
favourable
impact of the change in FX partially offset this decrease.
Coal
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
149
$
167
(11
)
$
(18
)
$
2
Carloads (in thousands)
75
84
(11
)
(9
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
5,394
5,894
(8
)
(500
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
2,001
$
1,996
—
$
5
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
2.76
2.83
(2
)
(0.07
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
38
Coal revenue was
$149 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$18 million
, or
11%
from
$167 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to a decline in volumes and lower fuel surcharge revenue. Higher freight rates and the
favourable
impact of the change in FX partially offset this decrease.
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
294
$
327
(10
)
$
(33
)
$
5
Carloads (in thousands)
147
166
(11
)
(19
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
10,742
11,598
(7
)
(856
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
2,001
$
1,968
2
$
33
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
2.73
2.82
(3
)
(0.09
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Coal revenue was
$294 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$33 million
, or
10%
from
$327 million
in the same period of
2015
. As in the
second quarter
, this
decrease
was primarily due to a decline in volumes and lower fuel surcharge revenue. Higher freight rates and the
favourable
impact of the change in FX partially offset this decrease.
Potash
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
79
$
106
(25
)
$
(27
)
$
2
Carloads (in thousands)
28
37
(24
)
(9
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
3,497
4,514
(23
)
(1,017
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
2,800
$
2,854
(2
)
$
(54
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
2.27
2.34
(3
)
(0.07
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Potash revenue was
$79 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$27 million
, or
25%
from
$106 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to a decline in Export Potash volumes and lower fuel surcharge revenue, partially offset by the
favourable
impact of the change in FX.
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
161
$
199
(19
)
$
(38
)
$
8
Carloads (in thousands)
55
68
(19
)
(13
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
6,682
8,189
(18
)
(1,507
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
2,928
$
2,933
—
$
(5
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
2.42
2.43
—
(0.01
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Potash revenue was
$161 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$38 million
, or
19%
from
$199 million
in the same period of
2015
. As in the
second quarter
, this
decrease
was primarily due to a decline in Export Potash volumes and lower fuel surcharge revenue, partially offset by the
favourable
impact of the change in FX.
39
Fertilizers and Sulphur
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
73
$
67
9
$
6
$
2
Carloads (in thousands)
15
15
—
—
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
1,019
935
9
84
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
4,981
$
4,508
10
$
473
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
7.16
7.12
1
0.04
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Fertilizers and sulphur revenue was
$73 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
an increase
of
$6 million
, or
9%
from
$67 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to a shift in mix of traffic to more fertilizers, which generally has a higher freight rate than sulphur, and the
favourable
impact of the change in FX. Lower fuel surcharge revenue partially offset this increase.
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
154
$
138
12
$
16
$
7
Carloads (in thousands)
31
32
(3
)
(1
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
2,186
2,050
7
136
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
4,987
$
4,381
14
$
606
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
7.04
6.73
5
0.31
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Fertilizers and sulphur revenue was
$154 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
an increase
of
$16 million
, or
12%
from
$138 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to higher volumes, a shift in mix of traffic to more fertilizers with higher freight rate than sulphur, and the
favourable
impact of the change in FX. Lower fuel surcharge revenue was a partial offset.
Forest Products
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
70
$
61
15
$
9
$
2
Carloads (in thousands)
17
15
13
2
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
1,245
1,061
17
184
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
4,055
$
3,902
4
$
153
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
5.59
5.73
(2
)
(0.14
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Forest products revenue was
$70 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
an increase
of
$9 million
, or
15%
from
$61 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was due to higher volumes and the
favourable
impact of the change in FX, partially offset by lower fuel surcharge revenue.
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
141
$
118
19
$
23
$
7
Carloads (in thousands)
34
30
13
4
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
2,402
2,080
15
322
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
4,135
$
3,880
7
$
255
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
5.87
5.69
3
0.18
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
40
Forest products revenue was
$141 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
an increase
of
$23 million
, or
19%
from
$118 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was due to higher volumes and the
favourable
impact of the change in FX. Lower fuel surcharge revenue partially offset this
increase
.
Chemicals and Plastics
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
162
$
171
(5
)
$
(9
)
$
7
Carloads (in thousands)
49
51
(4
)
(2
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
3,348
3,423
(2
)
(75
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
3,266
$
3,354
(3
)
$
(88
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
4.84
4.99
(3
)
(0.15
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Chemicals and plastics revenue was
$162 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$9 million
, or
5%
from
$171 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to lower fuel surcharge revenue and a decline in volumes, partially offset by the
favourable
impact of the change in FX.
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
356
$
349
2
$
7
$
25
Carloads (in thousands)
103
102
1
1
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
7,010
6,993
—
17
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
3,443
$
3,427
—
$
16
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
5.08
4.99
2
0.09
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Chemicals and plastics revenue was
$356 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
an increase
of
$7 million
, or
2%
from
$349 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to the
favourable
impact of the change in FX, partially offset by lower fuel surcharge revenue.
Crude
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
24
$
81
(70
)
$
(57
)
$
4
Carloads (in thousands)
7
19
(63
)
(12
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
854
2,796
(69
)
(1,942
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
3,248
$
4,294
(24
)
$
(1,046
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
2.83
2.92
(3
)
(0.09
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Crude revenue was
$24 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$57 million
, or
70%
from
$81 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to a decline in volumes as a result of the fall in crude oil prices and the northern Alberta wildfires, along with lower fuel surcharge revenue. The favourable impact of the change in FX partially offset this
decrease
.
41
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
95
$
179
(47
)
$
(84
)
$
15
Carloads (in thousands)
24
41
(41
)
(17
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
3,314
5,828
(43
)
(2,514
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
3,927
$
4,404
(11
)
$
(477
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
2.87
3.09
(7
)
(0.22
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Crude revenue was
$95 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$84 million
, or
47%
from
$179 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to a decline in volumes as a result of the fall in crude oil prices, lower fuel surcharge revenue and traffic mix changes that lowered the average freight revenue per revenue ton-mile. The favourable impact of the change in FX partially offset this
decrease
.
Metals, Minerals and Consumer Products
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
140
$
160
(13
)
$
(20
)
$
6
Carloads (in thousands)
50
54
(7
)
(4
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
2,089
2,172
(4
)
(83
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
2,800
$
2,946
(5
)
$
(146
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
6.68
7.37
(9
)
(0.69
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Metals, minerals and consumer products revenue was
$140 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$20 million
, or
13%
from
$160 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to traffic mix changes that lowered the average freight rate, reduced fuel surcharge revenue and a decline in volumes. The favourable impact of the change in FX partially offset this
decrease
.
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
273
$
319
(14
)
$
(46
)
$
22
Carloads (in thousands)
95
109
(13
)
(14
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
3,896
4,455
(13
)
(559
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
2,884
$
2,911
(1
)
$
(27
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
7.00
7.15
(2
)
(0.15
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Metals, minerals and consumer products revenue was
$273 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$46 million
, or
14%
from
$319 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to a decline in volumes, traffic mix changes that lowered the average freight rate and reduced fuel surcharge revenue. The favourable impact of the change in FX partially offset this
decrease
.
42
Automotive
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
93
$
91
2
$
2
$
4
Carloads (in thousands)
35
36
(3
)
(1
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
495
496
—
(1
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
2,629
$
2,541
3
$
88
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
18.79
18.37
2
0.42
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Automotive revenue was
$93 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
an increase
of
$2 million
, or
2%
from
$91 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to the
favourable
impact of the change in FX and an increase in the average freight rate, partially offset by lower fuel surcharge revenue.
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
184
$
173
6
$
11
$
12
Carloads (in thousands)
68
66
3
2
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
912
915
—
(3
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
2,689
$
2,610
3
$
79
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
20.15
18.89
7
1.26
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Automotive revenue was
$184 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
an increase
of
$11 million
, or
6%
from
$173 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to increased volumes of higher rated short-haul traffic and the
favourable
impact of the change in FX, partially offset by lower fuel surcharge revenue.
Domestic Intermodal
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
177
$
192
(8
)
$
(15
)
$
1
Carloads (in thousands)
106
106
—
—
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
2,996
3,063
(2
)
(67
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
1,668
$
1,812
(8
)
$
(144
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
5.91
6.26
(6
)
(0.35
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Domestic intermodal revenue was
$177 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$15 million
, or
8%
from
$192 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to lower fuel surcharge revenue and a decline in volumes, partially offset by the
favourable
impact of the change in FX.
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
348
$
386
(10
)
$
(38
)
$
4
Carloads (in thousands)
204
209
(2
)
(5
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
5,843
6,087
(4
)
(244
)
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
1,701
$
1,852
(8
)
$
(151
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
5.95
6.35
(6
)
(0.40
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
43
Domestic intermodal revenue was
$348 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$38 million
, or
10%
from
$386 million
in the same period of
2015
. As in the
second quarter
, this
decrease
was primarily due to lower fuel surcharge revenue and a decline in volumes, partially offset by the
favourable
impact of the change in FX.
International Intermodal
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
137
$
153
(10
)
$
(16
)
$
2
Carloads (in thousands)
133
146
(9
)
(13
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
3,185
3,121
2
64
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
1,034
$
1,047
(1
)
$
(13
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
4.31
4.90
(12
)
(0.59
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
International intermodal revenue was
$137 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$16 million
, or
10%
from
$153 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to traffic mix changes that lowered the average freight rate as a result of fewer revenue generating moves of empty customer containers and lower fuel surcharge revenue. The
favourable
impact of the change in FX partially offset this
decrease
.
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Freight revenues (in millions)
$
279
$
298
(6
)
$
(19
)
$
9
Carloads (in thousands)
268
281
(5
)
(13
)
N/A
Revenue ton-miles (in millions)
6,215
5,994
4
221
N/A
Freight revenue per carload (dollars)
$
1,042
$
1,058
(2
)
$
(16
)
Freight revenue per revenue ton-mile (cents)
4.49
4.97
(10
)
(0.48
)
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
International intermodal revenue was
$279 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of
$19 million
, or
6%
from
$298 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to traffic mix changes that lowered the average freight rate as a result of fewer revenue generating moves of empty customer containers and lower fuel surcharge revenue. Higher volumes and the
favourable
impact of the change in FX partially offset this
decrease
.
Operating Expenses
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30 (in millions)
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Compensation and benefits
$
284
$
308
(8
)
$
(24
)
$
6
Fuel
131
185
(29
)
(54
)
8
Materials
38
45
(16
)
(7
)
—
Equipment rents
44
46
(4
)
(2
)
2
Depreciation and amortization
161
145
11
16
1
Purchased services and other
241
276
(13
)
(35
)
6
Total operating expenses
$
899
$
1,005
(11
)
$
(106
)
$
23
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Operating expenses were
$899 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
106 million
, or
11
%, from $
1,005 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to:
•
lower volume variable expenses;
•
efficiencies generated from improved operating performance and asset utilization;
•
the favourable impact of $33 million from lower fuel prices; and
•
higher defined benefit pension plan income of $22 million.
44
This
decrease
was partially offset by the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of $23 million.
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30 (in millions)
2016
2015
% Change
Total Change
FX Impact
(1)
Compensation and benefits
$
613
$
686
(11
)
$
(73
)
$
18
Fuel
256
380
(33
)
(124
)
25
Materials
94
97
(3
)
(3
)
3
Equipment rents
89
88
1
1
5
Depreciation and amortization
323
291
11
32
5
Purchased services and other
462
516
(10
)
(54
)
21
Total operating expenses
$
1,837
$
2,058
(11
)
$
(221
)
$
77
(1)
FX impact is a component of the Total Change.
Operating expenses were
$1,837 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
221 million
, or
11
%, from $
2,058 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to:
•
the favourable impact of $100 million from lower fuel prices;
•
lower volume variable expenses;
•
efficiencies generated from improved operating performance and asset utilization; and
•
higher defined benefit pension plan income of $55 million.
This
decrease
was partially offset by the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of
$77 million
.
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits expense includes employee wages, salaries, fringe benefits and stock-based compensation. Compensation and benefits expense was $
284 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
24 million
, or
8
%, from $
308 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to fewer employees and higher defined benefit pension plan income of $22 million.
This
decrease
was partially offset by:
•
the impact of wage and benefit inflation of approximately 3%;
•
the unfavourable impact of higher stock-based compensation of $7 million primarily driven by the smaller reduction in stock price compared to the same period in 2015; and
•
the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of
$6 million
.
Compensation and benefits expense was $
613 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
73 million
, or
11
%, from $
686 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to fewer employees and higher defined benefit pension plan income of $55 million. This
decrease
was partially offset by the impact of wage and benefit inflation of approximately 3% and the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of
$18 million
.
Fuel
Fuel expense consists mainly of fuel used by locomotives and includes provincial, state and federal fuel taxes. Fuel expense was $
131 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
54 million
, or
29
%, from $
185 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to:
•
the favourable impact of $33 million from lower fuel prices;
•
a reduction in workload, as measured by GTMs; and
•
improvements in fuel efficiency of approximately
1%
.
This
decrease
was partially offset by the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of
$8 million
.
Fuel expense was $
256 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
124 million
, or
33
%, from $
380 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to:
•
the favourable impact of $100 million from lower fuel prices;
•
a reduction in workload, as measured by GTMs; and
•
improvements in fuel efficiency of approximately 3%.
This
decrease
was partially offset by the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of
$25 million
.
45
Materials
Materials expense includes the cost of material used for track, locomotive, freight car and building maintenance and software sustainment. Materials expense was $
38 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
7 million
or
16
%, from $
45 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to lower volumes.
Materials expense was $
94 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
3 million
or
3
%, from $
97 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to lower volumes, partially offset by the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of
$3 million
.
Equipment Rents
Equipment rents expense includes the cost associated with using other railways freight cars, intermodal equipment, and locomotives, net of rental income received from other railways for the use of CP’s equipment. Equipment rents expense was $
44 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
2 million
or
4
% from $
46 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to the purchase or return of leased freight cars reducing rental expense by $3 million. This decrease was largely offset by the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of
$2 million
. Lower volumes resulted in an equal impact to CP's rental income and rental expense.
Equipment rents expense was $
89 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
an increase
of $
1 million
or
1
% from $
88 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to the return of subleased locomotives and freight cars reducing rental income by $5 million, and the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of
$5 million
. This
increase
was largely offset by the purchase or return of leased freight cars and intermodal equipment reducing rental expenses by $8 million.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense represents the charge associated with the use of track and roadway, buildings, rolling stock, information systems and other depreciable assets. Depreciation and amortization expense was $
161 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
an increase
of $
16 million
, or
11
%, from $
145 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to a higher depreciable asset base.
Depreciation and amortization expense was $
323 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
an increase
of $
32 million
, or
11
%, from $
291 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to a higher depreciable asset base and the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of
$5 million
.
Purchased Services and Other
2016 vs. 2015
For the three months ended June 30 (in millions)
2016
2015
(1)
% Change
Total change
Support and facilities
$
77
$
73
5
$
4
Track and operations
56
63
(11
)
(7
)
Intermodal
44
46
(4
)
(2
)
Equipment
39
52
(25
)
(13
)
Casualty
14
11
27
3
Property taxes
29
26
12
3
Other
(16
)
6
(367
)
(22
)
Land sales
(2
)
(1
)
100
(1
)
Total Purchased services and other
$
241
$
276
(13
)
$
(35
)
(1)
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified within Purchased services and other to conform with 2016 presentation: previously Property taxes were included in Support and facilities, Track and operations and Other.
Purchased services and other expense encompasses a wide range of third-party costs, including expenses for joint facilities, personal injuries and damage, environmental remediation, property and other taxes, contractor and consulting fees, insurance, and gains on land sales. Purchased services and other expense was $
241 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
35 million
, or
13
% from $
276 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to:
•
a $17 million gain on sale of surplus freight cars, reported in Other;
•
lower third-party locomotive overhauls and maintenance costs, reported in Equipment;
•
lower contractor services cost, reported in Track and operations and Support and facilities; and
•
lower crew travel and accommodations costs, reported in Track and operations.
46
This
decrease
was partially offset by:
•
the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of
$6 million
;
•
higher casualty expenses of $3 million as a result of costlier mishaps, reported in Casualty; and
•
higher property taxes of $2 million (excluding an unfavourable FX impact of $1 million).
2016 vs. 2015
For the six months ended June 30 (in millions)
2016
2015
(1)
% Change
Total change
Support and facilities
$
161
$
149
8
$
12
Track and operations
112
125
(10
)
(13
)
Intermodal
88
93
(5
)
(5
)
Equipment
83
103
(19
)
(20
)
Casualty
34
44
(23
)
(10
)
Property taxes
59
53
11
6
Other
(20
)
11
(282
)
(31
)
Land sales
(55
)
(62
)
(11
)
7
Total Purchased services and other
$
462
$
516
(10
)
$
(54
)
(1)
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified within Purchased services and other to conform with 2016 presentation: previously Property taxes were included in Support and facilities, Track and operations and Other.
Purchased services and other expense was $
462 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
54 million
, or
10
% from $
516 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was primarily due to:
•
a $17 million gain on sale of surplus freight cars, reported in Other;
•
lower third-party freight car and locomotive maintenance costs, reported in Equipment;
•
lower contractor services cost, reported in Track and operations and Support and facilities;
•
lower crew travel and accommodations costs, reported in Track and operations;
•
lower casualty expenses of $12 million (excluding an unfavourable FX impact of $2 million) as a result of lower personal injuries and lower incident costs, reported in Casualty; and
•
lower intermodal expenses related to pickup and delivery service, reported in Intermodal.
This
decrease
was partially offset by:
•
the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of
$21 million
;
•
lower land sales of $
7 million
; and
•
higher property taxes of $4 million (excluding an unfavourable FX impact of $2 million).
As part of optimizing its assets, the Company may identify and dispose of property used or formerly used in operating activities. In compliance with U.S. GAAP, the Company includes as part of operating expenses the gains and losses that arise on disposal of such long-lived assets. The following disposals have impacted Purchased services and other during the current and comparative periods:
•
In the second quarter of 2016, the Company disposed of 1,000 surplus freight cars that had reached or were nearing the end of their useful life, in a non-monetary exchange for new freight cars. The Company recognized a gain on sale of $17 million from the transaction and the sale did not impact cash from investing activities.
•
In the first quarter of 2016, the Company completed the sale of CP’s Arbutus Corridor to the City of Vancouver for gross proceeds of
$55 million
and a gain on sale of $50 million. The agreement allows the Company to share in future proceeds on the eventual development and/or sale of certain parcels of the Arbutus Corridor.
•
In the first quarter of 2015, the Company recorded a gain of $31 million following the sale of a building after resolution of legal proceedings, and the Company sold various sections of land in eastern Canada for transit purposes, recognizing gains totalling $60 million.
Other Income Statement Items
Other Income and Charges
Other income and charges consists of gains and losses from the change in FX on long-term debt and working capital, various costs related to financing activities, shareholder costs, equity income and other non-operating expenditures. Other income and charges was a
gain
of
$9 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
, compared to a
gain
of
$5 million
in the same period of
2015
, a change of
$4 million
. This change was primarily due to a greater
favourable
impact of FX translation of
$18 million
on U.S. dollar-denominated debt during the
second quarter
of
2016
compared to
$10 million
in the same period of
2015
, discussed further in Non-GAAP Measures of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Other income and charges was a
gain
of
$190 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
, compared to an
expense
of
$68 million
in the same period of
2015
, a change of
$258 million
. This change was primarily due to a
favourable
impact of FX translation of
$199
47
million
on U.S. dollar-denominated debt in the
first six months
of
2016
, compared to an
unfavourable
FX impact of
$54 million
in the same period of
2015
.
Net Interest Expense
Net interest expense includes interest on long-term debt and capital leases. Net interest expense was $
115 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
an increase
of $
31 million
, or
37
%, from $
84 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to an additional $34 million of interest on new debt issued after the
second quarter
in
2015
and the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of $3 million. This increase was partially offset by interest savings due to principal payments and higher capitalized interest.
Net interest expense was $
239 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
an increase
of $
70 million
, or
41
%, from $
169 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
increase
was primarily due to an additional $67 million of interest on new debt issued after the
second quarter
in
2015
and the unfavourable impact of the change in FX of $10 million. This increase was also partially offset by interest savings due to principal payments and higher capitalized interest.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $
117 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
60 million
, or
34
%, from $
177 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was due to lower taxable earnings along with a lower effective tax rate in
2016
.
Income tax expense was $
287 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
,
a decrease
of $
24 million
, or
8
%, from $
311 million
in the same period of
2015
. This
decrease
was also due to lower taxable earnings along with a lower effective tax rate in
2016
.
The estimated annualized effective tax rate for the
second quarter
of
2016
excluding discrete items (FX translation of on U.S. dollar denominated debt) was 26.93%, compared to 27.50% during the same period of
2015
. For the
first six months
of
2016
, the estimated annualized effective tax rate was 27.25%, compared to 27.50% during the same period of
2015
.
The effective tax rate in the
second quarter
of
2016
, including discrete items was 26.40%, compared with 31.30% in the same period of
2015
. The higher effective tax rate in the prior period was due to legislation enacted to increase the Alberta provincial corporate income tax rate, during the
second quarter
of
2015
. As a result of this change, the Company recorded an income tax expense of $23 million in the
second quarter
of
2015
related to the revaluation of its deferred income tax balances as at January 1, 2015.
The effective tax rate in the
first six months
of
2016
, including discrete items was 24.86%, compared with 30.51% in the same period of
2015
. The lower effective tax rate in the current period was due to a tax expense related to FX translation gains on U.S. dollar-denominated debt in the
first six months
of
2016
. This compares to the higher effective tax rate in the
first six months
of
2015
due to the Alberta provincial corporate income tax rate increase, discussed above, and a tax recovery related to FX translation losses on U.S dollar-denominated debt. The tax expense in the
first six months
of
2016
and the tax recovery in the
first six months
of
2015
related to the U.S. dollar-denominated debt were assessed at significantly lower rates than the estimated annualized effective tax rates of 27.25% and 27.50%, respectively.
The Company expects an annualized effective tax rate in 2016 of approximately 27.25%. The Company’s 2016 outlook for its normalized income tax rate is based on certain assumptions about events and developments that may or may not materialize or that may be offset entirely or partially by other events and developments, discussed further in Item 1A. Risk Factors of CP's 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company believes adequate amounts of Cash and cash equivalents are available in the normal course of business to provide for ongoing operations, including the obligations identified in the tables in Contractual Commitments of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The Company is not aware of any trends or expected fluctuations in the Company's liquidity that would create any deficiencies. The Company's primary sources of liquidity include its Cash and cash equivalents, its bilateral letters of credit and its revolving credit facility.
As at
June 30, 2016
, the Company had
$92 million
of Cash and cash equivalents, U.S. $1.9 billion available under its revolving credit facility and up to $229 million available under its letters of credit facility (
December 31, 2015
-
$650 million
of Cash and cash equivalents, U.S. $2.0 billion available under revolving credit facilities and up to $225 million under letters of credit facility).
As at
June 30, 2016
, the Company's U.S. $2.0 billion revolving credit facility, which includes a U.S. $1.0 billion five-year portion and U.S. $1.0 billion one-year plus one-year term-out portion, was undrawn. On June 28, 2016, the maturity date on the U.S. $1.0 billion one-year plus one-year term-out portion was extended to June 28, 2018, and the maturity date on the U.S. $1.0 billion five-year portion was extended to June 28, 2021.The Company did not draw from its revolving credit facility during the
three months ended
June 30, 2016
. This facility was also undrawn as at
December 31, 2015
. The revolving credit facility agreement requires the Company not to exceed a maximum debt to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization ratio. As at
June 30, 2016
, the Company was in compliance with the threshold stipulated in this financial covenant.
48
The Company has a commercial paper program which enables it to issue commercial paper up to a maximum aggregate principal amount of U.S. $1.0 billion in the form of unsecured promissory notes. The commercial paper is backed by the U.S. $1.0 billion one-year plus one-year term-out portion of the revolving credit facility. At
June 30, 2016
, total commercial paper borrowings were U.S. $135 million (
December 31, 2015
- $nil), decreasing the amount available under the revolving credit facility to U.S. $1.9 billion at
June 30, 2016
. As at
June 30, 2016
, the Company does not intend to refinance outstanding commercial paper borrowings on a long-term basis.
As at
June 30, 2016
, under its bilateral letters of credit facility, the Company had letters of credit drawn of $371 million from a total available amount of $600 million. This compares to letters of credit drawn of $375 million from a total available amount of $600 million as at
December 31, 2015
. Under the bilateral letters of credit facility, the Company has the option to post collateral in the form of Cash or cash equivalents, equal at least to the face value of the letters of credit issued. Collateral provided may include highly liquid investments purchased three months or less from maturity and is stated at cost, which approximates market value. As at
June 30, 2016
, the Company had posted $nil in collateral on the bilateral letters of credit facility (
December 31, 2015
- $nil). The Company can largely withdraw this collateral during any month.
The following discussion of operating, investing and financing activities describes the Company’s indicators of liquidity and capital resources and financial performance.
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $
512 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
compared to $
585 million
in the same period of
2015
,
a decrease
of $
73 million
. The
decrease
in Cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to lower cash generating income in the
second quarter
of
2016
compared to the same period of
2015
.
Cash provided by operating activities was $
730 million
in the
first six months
of
2016
compared to $
1,140 million
in the same period of
2015
,
a decrease
of $
410 million
. The
decrease
in Cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to lower cash generating income, and an unfavourable change in working capital primarily as a result of higher income taxes paid and an increase in interest payments resulting from debt issued in 2015.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $
321 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
, a
decrease
of $
33 million
from $
354 million
in the same period of
2015
. For the
first six months
of
2016
, cash used in investing activities was $
539 million
, a
decrease
of $
6 million
from $
545 million
in the same period of
2015
. The
decrease
is primarily due to lower additions to properties during the
second quarter
and
first six months
of
2016
.
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities was $
669 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
, an
increase
of $
440 million
from $
229 million
in the same period of
2015
. The
increase
in cash used in financing activities is primarily due to higher purchases of CP Common Shares and lower net issuances of commercial paper compared to the same period of
2015
. For the
first six months
of
2016
, cash used in financing activities was $
731 million
, an
increase
of $
90 million
from $
641 million
in the same period of
2015
. The
increase
in cash used in financing activities is primarily due to issuance of long-term debt in the
first six months
of 2015. This was partially offset by net issuance of commercial paper during the
first six months
of 2016 versus net repayment of commercial paper in the same period of
2015
, and lower purchases of CP Common Shares.
Interest Coverage Ratio
For the twelve months ended
June 30, 2016
, the Company’s interest coverage ratio was
5.5
, compared with
8.0
for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2015
. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in Net interest expense of
$152 million
based on the twelve month period ended
June 30, 2016
, compared to the same period of
2015
, as well as a year over year decrease in Earnings before interest and taxes ("EBIT").
Excluding significant items from EBIT, Adjusted interest coverage ratio was
5.6
for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2016
, compared with
8.2
for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2015
. This decrease was primarily due to an increase in Net interest expense, as well as a year over year decrease in adjusted EBIT. Interest coverage ratio, Adjusted interest coverage ratio, EBIT, Adjusted EBIT, and significant items are defined and reconciled in Non-GAAP Measures of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Credit Measures
Credit ratings provide information relating to the Company’s financing costs, liquidity and operations, which impacts the Company’s ability to obtain short-term and long-term financing and/or the cost of such financing.
49
A mid-investment grade credit rating is an important measure in assessing the Company’s ability to maintain access to public financing and to minimize the cost of capital. It also affects the ability of the Company to engage in certain collateralized business activities on a cost-effective basis.
Credit ratings and outlooks are based on the rating agencies’ methodologies and can change from time to time to reflect their views of CP. Their views are affected by numerous factors including, but not limited to, the Company’s financial position and liquidity along with external factors beyond the Company’s control.
As at
June 30, 2016
, CP's credit ratings from Standard & Poor's Rating Services ("Standard & Poor's"), Moody's Investor Service ("Moody's"), and Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited ("DBRS") remain unchanged from
December 31, 2015
. During the
second quarter
of
2016
, Moody's changed the outlook on CP's Senior unsecured debt to negative from stable, and DBRS changed the outlook on CP's Unsecured debentures and Medium-term notes to negative from stable. Standard & Poor's affirmed a stable rating on CP's Long-term corporate credit, Senior secured debt and Senior unsecured debt.
The Company’s goal is to maintain a degree of continuity and predictability for investors by meeting a minimum threshold. The Adjusted net debt to Adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) ratio for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2016
and
June 30, 2015
was
2.9
and
2.3
, respectively. This increase was primarily due to additional debt issued during the 2015 fiscal year, partially offset by the improved Adjusted income for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2016
. Adjusted net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio and Adjusted income are defined and reconciled in Non-GAAP Measures of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Free Cash
CP generated positive Free cash of
$137 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
, a decrease of
$36 million
from positive Free cash of
$173 million
in the same period of
2015
. For the
first six months
of
2016
, CP generated positive Free cash of
$66 million
, a decrease of
$419 million
from positive Free cash of
$485 million
in the same period of
2015
. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in cash provided by operating activities. Free cash is defined and reconciled in Non-GAAP Measures of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Free cash is affected by seasonal fluctuations and by other factors including the size of the Company's additions to properties. Capital additions were
$330 million
in the
second quarter
of
2016
,
$25 million
lower than in the same period of
2015
. In the
first six months
of
2016
, capital additions were
$608 million
,
$10 million
lower than in the same period of
2015
.
Share Capital
At
July 18, 2016
, the latest practicable date, there were 147,771,618 Common Shares and no preferred shares issued and outstanding, which consists of 15,113 holders of record of the Company's Common Shares. In addition, CP has a Management Stock Option Incentive Plan (“MSOIP”), under which key officers and employees are granted options to purchase CP shares. Each option granted can be exercised for one Common Share. At
July 18, 2016
, 2.7 million options were outstanding under the Company’s MSOIP and stand-alone option agreements entered into with Mr. E. Hunter Harrison and Mr. Keith E. Creel. There are 1.5 million options available to be issued by the Company’s MSOIP in the future.
CP has a Director's Stock Option Plan (“DSOP”), under which directors are granted options to purchase CP shares. There are no outstanding options under the DSOP, which has 0.3 million options available to be issued in the future.
An aggregate of 178,618 Common Shares of the Company beneficially owned or controlled by Mr. E. Hunter Harrison have been pledged as security for his personal line of credit. 153,100 of those Common Shares were pledged on December 30, 2014 and 25,518 of those Common Shares were pledged on June 3, 2016. Effective July 18, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an anti-pledging policy, which prohibits transactions after the effective date of policy that result in the holding of Common Shares or securities exercisable or convertible into Common Shares, in a margin account, or otherwise pledging such securities as collateral for a loan, subject only to Board approved exceptions where the person wishing to pledge indicates his or her financial capacity to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities.
Non-GAAP Measures
The Company presents non-GAAP measures and cash flow information to provide a basis for evaluating underlying earnings and liquidity trends in the Company’s business that can be compared with the results of operations in prior periods. In addition, these non-GAAP measures facilitate a multi-period assessment of long-term profitability allowing management and other external users of the Company’s consolidated financial information to compare profitability on a long-term basis, including assessing future profitability, with that of the Company’s peers.
These non-GAAP measures have no standardized meaning and are not defined by GAAP and, therefore, may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. The presentation of these non-GAAP measures is not intended to be considered in isolation from, as a substitute for, or as superior to, the financial information presented in accordance with GAAP.
50
Adjusted Performance Measures
The Company uses Adjusted income and Adjusted diluted earnings per share to evaluate the Company’s operating performance and for planning and forecasting future business operations and future profitability. These non-GAAP measures are presented in Financial Highlights and discussed further in other sections of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. These non-GAAP measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding operating results because they exclude certain significant items that are not considered indicative of future financial trends either by nature or amount. As a result, these items are excluded for management assessment of operational performance, allocation of resources and preparation of annual budgets. These significant items may include, but are not limited to, restructuring and asset impairment charges, individually significant gains and losses from sales of assets and certain items outside the control of management. These items may not be non-recurring. However, excluding these significant items from GAAP results allows for a consistent understanding of the Company's consolidated financial performance when performing a multi-period assessment including assessing the likelihood of future results. Accordingly, these non-GAAP financial measures may provide insight to investors and other external users of the Company's consolidated financial information.
In
2016
, there was one significant item included in Net income:
•
during the six months ended June 30, 2016, a net non-cash gain of $199 million ($172 million after deferred tax) due to FX translation of the Company’s U.S. dollar-denominated debt as follows:
•
in the second quarter, an $18 million gain ($16 million after deferred tax); and
•
in the first quarter, a $181 million gain ($156 million after deferred tax).
In
2015
, there were four significant items included in Net income:
•
in the third quarter, a $68 million gain ($42 million after current tax) related to the sale of D&H South;
•
in the third quarter, a $47 million charge ($35 million after deferred tax) related to the early redemption premium on notes;
•
in the second quarter, a deferred income tax expense of $23 million as a result of the change in the Alberta provincial corporate income tax rate; and
•
during the course of the year, a net non-cash loss of $297 million ($257 million after deferred tax) due to FX translation of the Company’s U.S. dollar-denominated debt as follows:
•
in the fourth quarter, a $115 million loss ($100 million after deferred tax);
•
in the third quarter, a $128 million loss ($111 million after deferred tax);
•
in the second quarter, a $10 million gain ($9 million after deferred tax); and
•
in the first quarter, a $64 million loss ($55 million after deferred tax).
In
2014
, there was one significant item included in Net income:
•
in the fourth quarter, a $12 million net non-cash loss ($9 million after deferred tax) due to FX translation on the Company’s U.S. dollar-denominated debt.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to GAAP Measures
The following tables reconcile non-GAAP measures presented in Financial Highlights, and discussed further in other sections of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, to the most directly comparable measures presented in accordance with GAAP for the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
and
2015
:
Adjusted income is calculated as Net income reported on a GAAP basis less significant items.
Net income
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
(in millions)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Adjusted income
$
312
$
404
$
696
$
779
Add significant items:
Impact of FX translation on U.S. dollar-denominated debt
16
9
172
(46
)
Income tax rate change
—
(23
)
—
(23
)
Net income as reported
$
328
$
390
$
868
$
710
51
Adjusted diluted earnings per share is calculated using Adjusted income, as defined above, divided by the weighted-average diluted shares outstanding during the period as determined in accordance with GAAP.
Diluted earnings per share
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
2016
2015
2016
2015
Adjusted diluted earnings per share
$
2.05
$
2.45
$
4.55
$
4.70
Add significant items:
Impact of FX translation on U.S. dollar-denominated debt
0.10
0.05
1.12
(0.28
)
Income tax rate change
—
(0.14
)
—
(0.14
)
Diluted earnings per share as reported
$
2.15
$
2.36
$
5.67
$
4.28
ROIC and Adjusted ROIC
ROIC is calculated as Operating income less Other income and charges, tax affected at the Company's annualized effective tax rate, on a rolling twelve-month basis, divided by the sum of Total shareholders' equity, Long-term debt, Long-term debt maturing within one year and Short-term borrowing, as presented in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, averaged between the beginning and ending balance over a rolling twelve-month period. Adjusted ROIC excludes significant items reported in Operating income and Other income and charges in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, as these significant items are not considered indicative of future financial trends either by nature or amount. ROIC and Adjusted ROIC are all-encompassing performance measures that measure how productively the Company uses its long-term capital investments, representing critical indicators of good operating and investment decisions made by management and are important performance criteria in determining certain elements of the Company's long-term incentive plan. ROIC and Adjusted ROIC are presented in Financial Highlights and discussed further in Results of Operations of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Calculation of ROIC and Adjusted ROIC
(in millions, except for percentages)
2016
2015
Operating income for the twelve months ended June 30
$
2,634
$
2,587
Less:
Other income and charges
77
84
Tax
(1)
709
721
$
1,848
$
1,782
Average for the twelve months of total shareholders' equity, long-term debt, long-term debt maturing within one year and short-term borrowing
12,612
11,889
ROIC
14.7
%
15.0
%
(1)
Tax was calculated at the annualized effective tax rate of 27.73% for 2016 and 28.79% for 2015 for each of the above items for the periods presented.
(in millions, except for percentages)
2016
2015
Operating income for the twelve months ended June 30
$
2,634
$
2,587
Less significant items:
Gain on sale of D&H South
68
—
Adjusted operating income for the twelve months ended June 30
2,566
2,587
Less:
Other income and charges
77
84
Add significant items:
Impact of FX translation on U.S. dollar-denominated debt
44
66
Early redemption premium on notes
47
—
Less: tax
(1)
705
708
$
1,875
$
1,861
Average for the twelve months of total shareholders' equity, long-term debt, long-term debt maturing within one year and short-term borrowing
12,612
11,889
Adjusted ROIC
14.9
%
15.7
%
(1)
Tax was calculated at the adjusted annualized effective tax rate of 27.31% for 2016 and 27.57% for 2015 for each of the above items for the periods presented.
52
Free Cash
Free cash is calculated as Cash provided by operating activities, less Cash used in investing activities and Dividends paid, adjusted for changes in cash and cash equivalents balances resulting from FX fluctuations. Free cash is a measure that management considers to be an indicator of liquidity. Free cash is useful to investors and other external users of the consolidated financial information as it assists with the evaluation of the Company's ability to generate cash from its operations without incurring additional external financing. Positive Free cash indicates the amount of cash available for reinvestment in the business, or cash that can be returned to investors through increased dividends, stock repurchase programs, debt retirements or a combination of these. Conversely, negative Free cash indicates the amount of cash that must be raised from investors through new debt or equity issues, reduction in available cash balances or a combination of these. Free cash should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, Cash provided by operating activities. Free cash is presented in Financial Highlights and discussed further in Liquidity and Capital Resources of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Reconciliation of Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash
For the three months ended June 30
For the six months ended June 30
(in millions)
2016
2015
2016
2015
Cash provided by operating activities
$
512
$
585
$
730
$
1,140
Cash used in investing activities
(321
)
(354
)
(539
)
(545
)
Dividends paid
(53
)
(57
)
(107
)
(115
)
Effect of foreign currency fluctuations on U.S. dollar-denominated cash and cash equivalents
(1
)
(1
)
(18
)
5
Free cash
$
137
$
173
$
66
$
485
Interest Coverage Ratio
Interest coverage ratio is measured, on a rolling twelve-month basis, as EBIT divided by Net interest expense. Interest coverage ratio is an indicator of liquidity used in assessing the Company’s debt servicing capabilities. This ratio provides useful information on how the Company's debt servicing capabilities have changed, period over period and in comparison to the Company’s peers. Additionally, investors, analysts, and lenders may use this measure to assess the Company's debt servicing capabilities. Interest coverage ratio is discussed further in Liquidity and Capital Resources of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Adjusted interest coverage ratio is calculated as Adjusted EBIT divided by Net interest expense. By excluding significant items which affect EBIT, Adjusted interest coverage ratio assists management in comparing the Company's performance over various reporting periods on a consistent basis. Adjusted interest coverage ratio is discussed further in Liquidity and Capital Resources of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Calculation of Interest Coverage Ratio and Adjusted Interest Coverage Ratio
For the twelve months ended June 30
(in millions, except for ratios)
2016
2015
EBIT
$
2,557
$
2,503
Adjusted EBIT
2,580
2,569
Net interest expense
464
312
Interest coverage ratio
5.5
8.0
Adjusted interest coverage ratio
5.6
8.2
Reconciliation of Adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization and Earnings before interest and tax
Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as Adjusted EBIT plus Depreciation and amortization, adjusted for net periodic pension and other benefit cost and operating lease expense. EBIT is calculated as Operating income, less Other income and charges. Adjusted EBIT excludes significant items reported in Operating income and Other income and charges.
53
(in millions)
2016
2015
Adjusted EBITDA for the twelve months ended June 30
$
3,203
$
3,159
Add:
Adjustment for net periodic pension and other benefit cost
115
112
Operating lease expense
(111
)
(137
)
Depreciation and amortization
(627
)
(565
)
Adjusted EBIT for the twelve months ended June 30
2,580
2,569
Add Significant items:
Gain on sale of D&H South
68
—
Impact of FX translation on U.S. dollar-denominated debt
(44
)
(66
)
Early redemption premium on notes
(47
)
—
EBIT for the twelve months ended June 30
2,557
2,503
Less:
Net interest expense
464
312
Income tax expense
583
630
Net income as reported
$
1,510
$
1,561
Adjusted Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA Ratio
Adjusted net debt is defined as Long-term debt, Long-term debt maturing within one year and Short-term borrowing as reported on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets adjusted for pension plans deficit, the net present value of operating leases, which is discounted by the Company’s effective interest rate for each of the periods presented, and Cash and cash equivalents. Adjusted net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio is calculated as Adjusted net debt divided by Adjusted EBITDA.
The Adjusted net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio is one of the key metrics used by credit rating agencies in assessing the Company's financial capacities and constraints and determining the credit rating of the Company. By excluding the impact of certain items that are not considered by management in developing a minimum threshold, Adjusted net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio provides a metric that management uses to evaluate the Company's financial discipline with respect to capital markets credit sensitivities from management's perspective and communicates it publicly with investors, analysts and credit rating agencies. Adjusted net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio is discussed further in Liquidity and Capital Resources of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Calculation of Adjusted Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA Ratio
(in millions, except for ratios)
2016
2015
Adjusted net debt as at June 30
$
9,133
$
7,216
Adjusted EBITDA for the twelve months ended June 30
3,203
3,159
Adjusted net debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio
2.9
2.3
Reconciliation of Adjusted Net Debt to Long-term Debt
(in millions)
2016
2015
Adjusted net debt as at June 30
$
9,133
$
7,216
Add:
Pension plans deficit
(290
)
(291
)
Net present value of operating leases
(1)
(354
)
(409
)
Cash and cash equivalents
92
185
Long-term debt including long term debt maturing within one year as at June 30
$
8,581
$
6,701
(1)
Operating leases were discounted at the Company’s effective interest rate for each of the periods presented.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Guarantees
At
June 30, 2016
, the Company had residual value guarantees on operating lease commitments of $26 million, compared to $28 million at
December 31, 2015
. The maximum amount that could be payable under these and all of the Company’s other guarantees cannot be reasonably estimated due to the nature of certain guarantees. All or a portion of amounts paid under certain guarantees
54
could be recoverable from other parties or through insurance. As at
June 30, 2016
, the fair value of these guarantees recognized as a liability was $6 million, compared to $4 million at
December 31, 2015
.
Contractual Commitments
The accompanying table indicates the Company’s obligations and commitments to make future payments for contracts, such as debt, capital lease and commercial arrangements.
Contractual Commitments
At
June 30, 2016
Payments due by period (in millions)
Total
2016
2017 & 2018
2019 & 2020
2021 & beyond
Contractual commitments
Interest on long-term debt and capital lease
$
12,317
$
238
$
926
$
800
$
10,353
Long-term debt
8,519
184
780
540
7,015
Capital leases
162
2
9
10
141
Operating lease
(1)
469
46
148
91
184
Supplier purchase
1,309
121
346
167
675
Other long-term liabilities
(2)
572
54
116
110
292
Total contractual commitments
$
23,348
$
645
$
2,325
$
1,718
$
18,660
(1)
Residual value guarantees on certain leased equipment with a maximum exposure of $26 m
illion are not included in the minimum payments shown above, as management believes that CP will not be required to make payments under these residual guarantees.
(2)
Includes expected cash payments for restructuring, environmental remediation, asset retirement obligations, post-retirement benefits, workers’ compensation benefits, long-term disability benefits, pension benefit payments for the Company’s non-registered supplemental pension plan and certain other long-term liabilities. Projected payments for post-retirement benefits, workers’ compensation benefits and long-term disability benefits include the anticipated payments for years 2016 to 2025. Pension contributions for the Company’s registered pension plans are not included due to the volatility in calculating them. Pension payments are discussed further in Critical Accounting Estimates of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Certain Other Financial Commitments
In addition to the financial commitments mentioned previously in Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Commitments of this Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Company is party to certain other financial commitments set forth in the table and discussed below.
At
June 30, 2016
Amount of commitments per period (in millions)
Total
2016
2017 & 2018
2019 & 2020
2021 & beyond
Commitments
Letters of credit
$
371
$
371
$
—
$
—
$
—
Capital commitments
349
246
74
15
14
Total commitments
$
720
$
617
$
74
$
15
$
14
Letters of Credit
Letters of credit are obtained mainly to provide security to third parties under the terms of various agreements, including workers’ compensation and supplemental pension plan. CP is liable for these contractual amounts in the case of non-performance under these agreements. Letters of credit are accommodated through a revolving credit facility and the Company’s bilateral letters of credit facility.
Capital Commitments
The Company remains committed to maintaining the current high level of plant quality and renewing the franchise. As part of this commitment, CP has entered into contracts with suppliers to make various capital purchases related to track programs. Payments for these commitments are due in 2016 through 2032. These expenditures are expected to be financed by cash generated from operations or by issuing new debt.
Critical Accounting Estimates
To prepare consolidated financial statements that conform with GAAP, the Company is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
55
consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Using the most current information available, the Company reviews estimates on an ongoing basis, including those related to environmental liabilities, pensions and other benefits, property, plant and equipment, deferred income taxes, legal and personal injury liabilities and goodwill.
The development, selection and disclosure of these estimates, and this MD&A, have been reviewed by the Board of Directors’ Audit Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors.
Pensions and Other Benefits
Pension Liabilities and Pension Assets
The Company included pension benefit liabilities of $280 million in Pension and other benefit liabilities and $10 million in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Company’s Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets at
June 30, 2016
. The Company also included post-retirement benefits accruals of $386 million in Pension and other benefit liabilities and $21 million in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Company’s Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets at
June 30, 2016
.
The Company included pension benefit assets of $1,565 million in Pension assets on the Company’s Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets at
June 30, 2016
.
Pension Plan Contributions
The Company made contributions of $14 million to the defined benefit pension plans in the
second quarter
of
2016
, compared with $20 million in the same period of
2015
. In the
first six months
of
2016
, the Company made contributions of $34 million to the defined benefit pension plans, compared with $41 million in the same period of
2015
. The Company’s main Canadian defined benefit pension plan accounts for 95% of CP’s pension obligation and can produce significant volatility in pension funding requirements, given the pension fund’s size, the many factors that drive the pension plan’s funded status, and Canadian statutory pension funding requirements. The Company made voluntary prepayments of $600 million in 2011, $650 million in 2010 and $500 million in 2009 to the Company’s main Canadian defined benefit pension plan. CP has applied $1,276 million of these voluntary prepayments to reduce its pension funding requirements in 2012–2015, leaving $474 million of the voluntary prepayments still available at December 31, 2015 to reduce CP’s pension funding requirements in 2016 and future years. CP continues to have significant flexibility with respect to the rate at which the remaining voluntary prepayments are applied to reduce future years’ pension contribution requirements, which allows CP to manage the volatility of future pension funding requirements. At this time, CP estimates it will apply $5 million of the remaining voluntary prepayments against its
2016
pension funding requirements.
CP estimates its aggregate pension contributions, including its defined benefit and defined contribution plan, to be in the range of $50 million to $60 million in
2016
, and in the range of $50 million to $100 million per year from 2017 to 2019. These estimates reflect the Company’s current intentions with respect to the rate at which CP will apply the remaining voluntary prepayments against contribution requirements in the next few years.
Future pension contributions will be highly dependent on the Company’s actual experience with such variables as investment returns, interest rate fluctuations and demographic changes, on the rate at which previous years’ voluntary prepayments are applied against pension contribution requirements, and on any changes in the regulatory environment. CP will continue to make contributions to the pension plans that, at a minimum, meet pension legislative requirements.
Deferred Income Taxes
A deferred income tax expense of $90 million was included in Income tax expense for the
second quarter
of
2016
compared to $74 million for the same period of
2015
. For the
first six months
of
2016
, deferred income tax expense of $183 million was included in Income tax expense compared to $106 million the same period of
2015
.
The increase in deferred income tax expense in the second quarter of
2016
was primarily due to a change in the estimated timing of recognition of certain temporary differences that correspondingly decreased current tax expense, partially offset by lower pretax earnings compared to the same period of 2015. The increase in deferred income tax expense for the first six months of 2016 was attributable to the increase in the second quarter, as well as unrealized FX translation gains on U.S. dollar-denominated debt, which does not give rise to current tax expense.
At
June 30, 2016
, deferred income tax liabilities of $3,512 million were recorded as a long-term liability and are composed largely of temporary differences related to accounting for properties.
Legal and Personal Injury Liabilities
Provisions for incidents, claims and litigation charged to income, which were included in Purchase services and other expense, amounted to $13 million in the
second quarter
of
2016
compared with $9 million for the same period of
2015
. For the
first six months
of
2016
, these provisions amounted to $33 million compared with $35 million for the same period of
2015
.
56
Forward-Looking Information
This MD&A and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other relevant securities legislation. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the Company’s operations, anticipated financial performance, business prospects and strategies, including statements concerning the anticipation that cash flow from operations and various sources of financing will be sufficient to meet debt repayments and obligations in the foreseeable future and concerning anticipated capital programs, statements regarding future payments including income taxes and pension contributions, and capital expenditures. Forward-looking information typically contains statements with words such as “financial expectations”, “key assumptions”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “plan”, “will”, “outlook”, “should” or similar words suggesting future outcomes.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking information because it is possible that CP will not achieve predictions, forecasts, projections and other forms of forward-looking information. Current economic conditions render assumptions, although reasonable when made, subject to greater uncertainty. In addition, except as required by law, CP undertakes no obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
By its nature, forward-looking information involves numerous assumptions, inherent risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the following factors: changes in business strategies; general North American and global economic, credit and business conditions; risks in agricultural production such as weather conditions and insect populations; the availability and price of energy commodities; the effects of competition and pricing pressures; industry capacity; shifts in market demand; inflation; changes in laws and regulations, including regulation of rates; changes in taxes and tax rates; potential increases in maintenance and operating costs; uncertainties of investigations, proceedings or other types of claims and litigation; labour disputes; risks and liabilities arising from derailments; transportation of dangerous goods; timing of completion of capital and maintenance projects; currency and interest rate fluctuations; effects of changes in market conditions on the financial position of pension plans and investments; and various events that could disrupt operations, including severe weather, droughts, floods, avalanches and earthquakes as well as security threats and the governmental response to them, and technological changes.
There are more specific factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements contained in this MD&A. These more specific factors are identified and discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors of CP's
2015
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other risks are detailed from time to time in reports filed by CP with securities regulators in Canada and the United States.
57
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes to market risk during the
three and six months ended
June 30, 2016
from the information provided in Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk of CP's
2015
Annual Report on Form 10-K other than foreign exchange risk and share price impact on stock-based compensation discussed below:
Foreign Exchange Risk
Although CP conducts business primarily in Canada, a significant portion of its revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities including debt are denominated in U.S. dollars. The value of the Canadian dollar is affected by a number of domestic and international factors, including, without limitation, economic performance, and Canadian, U.S. and international monetary policies. Consequently, the Company’s results are affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate between these currencies. On an annualized basis, a $0.01 weakening (or strengthening) of the Canadian dollar positively (or negatively) impacts Total revenues by approximately $26 million and negatively (or positively) impacts Operating expenses by approximately $13 million. To manage this exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates between Canadian and U.S. dollars, CP may sell or purchase U.S. dollar forwards at fixed rates in future periods. In addition, changes in the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and other currencies (including the U.S. dollar) make the goods transported by the Company more or less competitive in the world marketplace and may in turn positively or negatively affect revenues.
FX translation on the Company’s U.S. dollar-denominated long-term debt is also impacted by this risk. A weakening (or strengthening) of the Canadian dollar negatively (or positively) impacts Other income and charges in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income. For further information, please refer to Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Note 20 Financial Instruments, in CP's
2015
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Share Price Impact on Stock-Based Compensation
For every $1.00 change in share price, stock-based compensation expense has a corresponding change of approximately $0.5 million to $0.7 million based on information available at June 30, 2016. This excludes the impact of changes in share price relative to the S&P/TSX 60 index and relative to Class I railways, which may trigger different performance share unit payouts.
58
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of
June 30, 2016
, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of and with the participation of CP's management, including its CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
June 30, 2016
, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the
second quarter
of
2016
, the Company has not identified any changes in internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
59
PART II
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For further details refer to Item 1. Financial Statements, Note 13 Contingencies.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes to the risk factors from the information provided in Item 1A. Risk Factors of CP's
2015
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities
On April 20, 2016, CP announced a new normal course issuer bid ("NCIB") to repurchase, for cancellation, up to 6.91 million of its Common Shares, which received approval by the TSX on April 28, 2016. The NCIB commenced on May 2, 2016 and will expire on May 1, 2017. During the
second quarter
of
2016
, CP repurchased 5.1 million Common Shares in total for $867 million at a weighted average price of $169.13. The following table presents Common Shares repurchased during each month for the second quarter of 2016
.
2016
Total Number of Shares Purchased
(1)
Average Price Paid per Share
(2)
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Maximum Number of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1 to April 30
—
$
—
—
—
May 1 to May 31
2,349,900
173.70
2,349,900
4,560,100
June 1 to June 30
2,777,900
165.26
2,777,900
1,782,200
Ending Balance
5,127,800
169.13
5,127,800
N/A
(1)
Includes shares repurchased but not yet canceled at quarter end.
(2)
Includes brokerage fees.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
60
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Description
10.1
Third Amending Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2016, amending the Credit Agreement, dated September 26, 2014, between Canadian Pacific Railway Company, as Borrower, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, as Covenantor, Royal Bank of Canada, as Administrative Agent, and the various Lenders party thereto.
31.1**
CEO Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications
31.2**
CFO Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications
32.1**
CEO Section 1350 Certifications
32.2**
CFO Section 1350 Certifications
101.INS**
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB**
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.DEF**
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.PRE**
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
The following financial information from Canadian Pacific Railway Limited’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter ended June 30, 2016, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) includes: (i) the Interim Consolidated Statements of Income for the second quarters and first six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the second quarters and first six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015; (iii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2016, and December 31, 2015; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the second quarters and first six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the first six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015; and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
**Filed with this Statement
61
Exhibit 31.1
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrants filed pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act.
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
I, E. Hunter Harrison, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date:
July 20, 2016
/s/ E. Hunter Harrison
E. Hunter Harrison
Chief Executive Officer
62
Exhibit 31.2
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrants filed pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act.
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
I, Mark J. Erceg, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date:
July 20, 2016
/s/ Mark J. Erceg
Mark J. Erceg
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
63
Exhibit 32.1
Certifications Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016 (the “Report”) to which this certificate is an exhibit, I, E. Hunter Harrison, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:
July 20, 2016
/s/ E. Hunter Harrison
E. Hunter Harrison
Chief Executive Officer
64
Exhibit 32.2
Certifications Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
In connection with the Annual Report of Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016 (the “Report”) to which this certificate is an exhibit, I, Mark J. Erceg, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:
July 20, 2016
/s/ Mark J. Erceg
Mark J. Erceg
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
65
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY LIMITED
(Registrant)
By:
/s/ Mark J. Erceg
Mark J. Erceg
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated:
July 20
,
2016
66