Companies:
10,652
total market cap:
$140.563 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Camden Property Trust
CPT
#1822
Rank
$11.56 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$108.53
Share price
0.98%
Change (1 day)
-7.21%
Change (1 year)
๐ Real estate
๐ฐ Investment
๐๏ธ REITs
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
Annual Reports (10-K)
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Camden Property Trust
Annual Reports (10-K)
Financial Year 2016
Camden Property Trust - 10-K annual report 2016
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ý
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number: 1-12110
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas
76-6088377
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2400
Houston, Texas
77046
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (713) 354-2500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $.01 par value
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
¨
No
ý
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
ý
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
Large accelerated filer
ý
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in the Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
¨
No
ý
The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant was
$7,646,700,508
based on a
June 30, 2016
share price of
$88.42
.
On
February 10, 2017
,
87,526,221
common shares of the registrant were outstanding, net of treasury shares and shares held in our deferred compensation arrangements.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's Proxy Statement in connection with its Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held
May 12, 2017
are incorporated by reference in Part III.
1
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I
Item 1.
Business
1
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
2
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
9
Item 2.
Properties
9
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
14
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
14
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
15
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
18
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
20
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
38
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
40
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
40
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
40
Item 9B.
Other Information
43
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
43
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
43
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
43
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
43
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
44
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
44
SIGNATURES
49
ii
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
Formed on May 25, 1993, Camden Property Trust, a Texas real estate investment trust (“REIT”), is primarily engaged in the ownership, management, development, redevelopment, acquisition, and construction of multifamily apartment communities. Unless the context requires otherwise, “we,” “our,” “us,” and the “Company” refer to Camden Property Trust and its consolidated subsidiaries. Our multifamily apartment communities are referred to as “communities,” “multifamily communities,” “properties,” or “multifamily properties” in the following discussion.
Our corporate offices are located at 11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2400, Houston, Texas 77046 and our telephone number is (713) 354-2500. Our website is located at www.camdenliving.com. On our website we make available free of charge our annual, quarterly, and current reports, and amendments to such reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We also make available, free of charge on our website, our Guidelines on Governance, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Code of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Officers, and the charters of each of our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Copies are also available, without charge, from Investor Relations, 11 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2400, Houston, Texas 77046. References to our website in this report are provided as a convenience and do not constitute, and should not be viewed as, an incorporation by reference of the information contained on, or available through our website, and therefore such information should not be considered part of this report.
Our annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements, and other information are electronically filed with the SEC. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please contact the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information about the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov which contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
Narrative Description of Business
As of
December 31, 2016
, we owned interests in, operated, or were developing
159
multifamily properties comprised of
55,366
apartment homes across the United States. Of the
159
properties,
seven
properties were under construction and will consist of a total of
2,573
apartment homes when completed. We also own land holdings which we may develop into multifamily communities in the future.
Operating and Business Strategy
We believe producing consistent earnings growth through property operations, development and acquisitions, achieving market balance, and recycling capital are crucial factors to our success. We rely heavily on our sophisticated property management capabilities and innovative operating strategies to help us maximize the earnings potential of our communities.
Real Estate Investments and Market Balance.
We believe we are well positioned in our current markets and have the expertise to take advantage of new opportunities as they arise. These capabilities, combined with what we believe is a conservative financial structure, should allow us to concentrate our growth efforts toward selective opportunities to enhance our strategy of having a geographically diverse portfolio of assets which meet the requirements of our residents.
We continue to operate in our core markets which we believe provides an advantage due to economies of scale. We believe, where possible, it is best to operate with a strong base of properties in order to benefit from the personnel allocation and the market strength associated with managing multiple properties in the same market. However, consistent with our goal of generating sustained earnings growth, we intend to selectively dispose of properties and redeploy capital for various strategic reasons, including if we determine a property cannot meet our long-term earnings growth expectations.
We try to maximize capital appreciation of our properties by investing in markets characterized by conditions favorable to multifamily property appreciation. These markets generally feature the following:
•
Strong economic growth leading to household formation and job growth, which in turn should support higher demand for our apartments; and,
•
An attractive quality of life, which may lead to higher demand and retention for our apartments and allow us to more readily increase rents.
1
Table of Contents
Subject to market conditions, we intend to continue to seek opportunities to develop, redevelop and acquire existing communities. We also intend to evaluate our operating property and land development portfolio and plan to continue our practice of selective dispositions as market conditions warrant and opportunities arise.
We also intend to strengthen our capital and liquidity positions by continuing to focus on our core fundamentals which currently are generating positive cash flows from operations, maintaining appropriate debt levels and leverage ratios, and controlling overhead costs. We anticipate meeting our near-term liquidity requirements through a combination of one or more of the following: cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash flows generated from operations, draws on our unsecured credit facility, proceeds from property dispositions, the use of debt and equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement, equity issued from our at-the-market ("ATM") share offering program, other unsecured borrowings, and secured mortgages.
Sophisticated Property Management
. We believe the depth of our organization enables us to deliver quality services, promote resident satisfaction, and retain residents, thereby increasing our operating revenues and reducing our operating expenses. We manage our properties utilizing a staff of professionals and support personnel, including certified property managers, experienced apartment managers and leasing agents, and trained apartment maintenance technicians. Our on-site personnel are trained to deliver high-quality services to our residents, and we strive to motivate our on-site employees through incentive compensation arrangements based upon property operational results, rental rate increases, occupancy levels, and level of new leases and lease renewals achieved.
Operations.
We believe an intense focus on operations is necessary to realize consistent, sustained earnings growth. Ensuring resident satisfaction, increasing rents as market conditions allow, maximizing rent collections, maintaining property occupancy at optimal levels, and controlling operating costs comprise our principal strategies to maximize property financial results. We believe our web-based property management and revenue management systems strengthen on-site operations and allow us to quickly adjust rental rates as local market conditions change. Lease terms are generally staggered based on vacancy exposure by apartment type so lease expirations are matched to each property's seasonal rental patterns. We generally offer leases ranging from
six
to
eighteen
months with individual property marketing plans structured to respond to local market conditions. In addition, we conduct ongoing customer service surveys to help ensure timely response to residents' changing needs and a high level of satisfaction.
Investments in Joint Ventures.
We have entered into, and may continue in the future to enter into, joint ventures or partnerships, including limited liability companies, through which we own an indirect economic interest in less than 100% of the community or land owned directly by the joint venture or partnership. We currently have three discretionary investment Funds (the “Funds”), two of which are closed to future investments, and the third of which we formed in March 2015 for future multifamily investments of up to $450 million. See Note 8, “Investments in Joint Ventures,” and Note 13, “Commitments and Contingencies,” in the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our investments in joint ventures.
Competition
There are numerous housing alternatives which compete with our communities in attracting residents. Our properties compete directly with other multifamily properties as well as condominiums and single-family homes which are available for rent or purchase in the markets in which our communities are located. This competitive environment could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease apartment homes at our present properties or any newly developed or acquired property, as well as on the rents realized.
Employees
At
December 31, 2016
, we had approximately 1,600 employees, including executive, administrative, and community personnel.
Qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust
As of
December 31, 2016
, we met the qualification of a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a result, we, with the exception of our taxable REIT subsidiaries, will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent we continue to meet certain requirements of the Code.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information contained in this Form 10-K, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating our business. Our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks.
2
Table of Contents
Risks Associated with Capital Markets, Credit Markets, and Real Estate
Volatility in capital and credit markets, or other unfavorable changes in economic conditions, either nationally or regionally in one or more of the markets in which we operate, could adversely impact us
.
The capital and credit markets are subject to volatility and disruption. We therefore may not be able to obtain new debt financing or refinance our existing debt on favorable terms or at all, which would adversely affect our liquidity, our ability to make distributions to shareholders, acquire assets and continue our development activities. Other weakened economic conditions, including job losses, high unemployment levels, stock market volatility, and uncertainty about the future, could adversely affect rental rates and occupancy levels. Unfavorable changes in economic conditions may have a material adverse impact on our cash flows and operating results.
Additional key economic risks which may adversely affect conditions in the markets in which we operate include the following:
•
local conditions, such as an oversupply of apartments or other housing available for rent, or a reduction in demand for apartments in the area;
•
declines in the financial condition of our tenants, which may make it more difficult for us to collect rents from some tenants;
•
declines in market rental rates;
•
low mortgage interest rates and home pricing, making alternative housing more affordable;
•
government or builder incentives which enable home buyers to put little or no money down, making alternative housing options more attractive;
•
regional economic downturns, including, but not limited to, business layoffs, downsizing and increased unemployment, which may impact one or more of our geographical markets; and
•
increased operating costs, if these costs cannot be passed through to residents.
Short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rents
.
Our apartment leases are generally for a term of
eighteen
months or less. As these leases typically permit the residents to leave at the end of the lease term without penalty, our rental revenues are impacted by declines in market rents more quickly than if our leases were for longer terms.
Competition could limit our ability to lease apartments or increase or maintain rental income
.
There are numerous housing alternatives which compete with our properties in attracting residents. Our properties compete directly with other multifamily properties as well as condominiums and single-family homes which are available for rent or purchase in the markets in which our properties are located. This competitive environment could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease apartment homes at our present properties or any newly developed or acquired property, as well as on the rents realized.
We face risks associated with land holdings and related activities
.
We hold land for future development and may in the future acquire additional land holdings. The risks inherent in purchasing, owning, and developing land increase as demand for apartments, or rental rates, decrease. Real estate markets are highly uncertain and, as a result, the value of undeveloped land may fluctuate significantly. In addition, carrying costs can be significant and can result in losses or reduced profitability. As a result, we hold certain land, and may in the future acquire additional land, in our development pipeline at a cost we may not be able to fully recover or at a cost which may preclude our developing a profitable multifamily community. If there are subsequent changes in the fair market value of our land holdings which we determine is less than the carrying basis of our land holdings reflected in our financial statements plus estimated costs to sell, we may be required to take future impairment charges which would reduce our net income.
Potential reforms to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could adversely affect us
.
There is significant uncertainty surrounding the futures of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Through their lender originator networks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are significant lenders both to us and to buyers of our properties. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have a mandate to support multifamily housing through their financing activities and any changes to their mandates, further reductions in their size or the scale of their activities, or loss of their key personnel could have a significant adverse impact on us and may, among other things, lead to lower values for our assets and higher interest rates on our
3
Table of Contents
borrowings. Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's regulator has set overall volume limits on most of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's lending activities. The regulator in the future could require Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to focus more of their lending activities on small borrowers or properties the regulator deems affordable, which may or may not include our assets, which could also adversely impact us. In addition, the members of the current Presidential administration have announced restructuring and privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is a priority of the current administration, and there is uncertainty regarding the impact of this action on us and buyers of our properties.
Risks Associated with Our Operations
Development, redevelopment and construction risks could impact our profitability
.
We intend to continue to develop, redevelop and construct multifamily apartment communities for our portfolio. In 2017, we expect to incur costs between approximately
$150 million
and
$170 million
related to the construction of
seven
consolidated projects. Additionally, during 2017, we expect to incur costs between approximately
$20 million
and
$30 million
related to the start of new development activities and between approximately
$24 million
and
$28 million
related to redevelopment of existing properties. Our development, redevelopment and construction activities may be exposed to a number of risks which may increase our construction costs and decrease our profitability, including the following:
•
inability to obtain, or delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy, and other required permits and authorizations;
•
increased materials and labor costs, problems with contractors or subcontractors, or other costs including those costs due to errors and omissions which occur in the design or construction process;
•
inability to obtain financing with favorable terms;
•
inability to complete construction and lease-up of a community on schedule;
•
forecasted occupancy and rental rates may differ from the actual results; and
•
the incurrence of costs related to the abandonment of development opportunities which we have pursued and subsequently deemed unfeasible.
Our inability to successfully implement our development, redevelopment and construction strategy could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to satisfy our financial obligations and pay distributions to shareholders.
One of our wholly-owned subsidiaries is engaged in the business of providing general contracting services under construction contracts entered into between it and third parties (which may include our nonconsolidated affiliates). The terms of those construction contracts generally require this subsidiary to estimate the time and costs to complete a project, and to assume the risk when these estimates may be greater than anticipated. As a result, profitability on those contracts is dependent on the ability to accurately predict such factors. The time and costs necessary to complete a project may be affected by a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, those listed above, many of which are beyond this subsidiary’s control. In addition, the terms of those contracts generally require this subsidiary to warrant its work for a period of time during which it may be required to repair, replace, or rebuild non-conforming work. Further, trailing liabilities, based on various legal theories such as claims of negligent construction, may result from such projects, and these trailing liabilities may go on for a number of years depending on the length of the statute of repose in the applicable jurisdictions.
Investments through joint ventures and discretionary funds involve risks not present in investments in which we are the sole investor
.
We have invested and may continue to invest as a joint venture partner in joint ventures. These investments involve risks, including, but not limited to, the possibility the other joint venture partner may: have business goals which are inconsistent with ours, possess the ability to take or force action or withhold consent contrary to our requests, or become insolvent and require us to assume and fulfill the joint venture’s financial obligations. We and our joint venture partners may each have the right to initiate a buy-sell arrangement, which could cause us to sell our interest, or acquire a joint venture partner’s interest, at a time when we otherwise would not have entered into such a transaction. Each joint venture agreement is individually negotiated, and our ability to operate, finance, or dispose of a community in our sole discretion may be limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of the applicable joint venture agreement. The risks associated with our discretionary Funds, which we manage as the general partner and advisor, include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries is the general partner of the Funds and has unlimited liability for the third-party debts, obligations, and liabilities of the Funds pursuant to partnership law;
4
Table of Contents
•
investors in the Funds (other than us), by majority vote, may remove our subsidiary as the general partner of the Funds with or without cause and the Funds’ advisory boards, by a majority vote of their members, may remove our subsidiary as the general partner of the Funds at any time for cause;
•
while we have broad discretion to manage the Funds and make investment decisions on behalf of the Funds, the investors or the Funds' advisory boards must approve certain matters, and as a result we may be unable to make certain investments or implement certain decisions on behalf of the Funds which we consider beneficial;
•
our ability to dispose of all or a portion of our investments in the Funds is subject to significant restrictions; and
•
we may be liable if the Funds fail to comply with various tax or other regulatory matters.
Competition could adversely affect our ability to acquire properties
.
We expect other real estate investors, including insurance companies, pension and investment funds, private investors, and other multifamily REITs, will compete with us to acquire additional operating properties. This competition could increase prices for the type of properties we would likely pursue and adversely affect our ability to acquire these properties or achieve the expected profitability of such properties upon acquisition.
Our acquisition strategy may not produce the cash flows expected
.
We may acquire additional operating properties on a selective basis. Our acquisition activities are subject to a number of risks, including, but not limited to, the following:
•
we may not be able to successfully integrate acquired properties into our existing operations;
•
our estimates of the costs, if any, of repositioning or redeveloping the acquired property may prove inaccurate;
•
the expected occupancy, rental rates and operating expenses may differ from the actual results;
•
we may not be able to obtain adequate financing; and
•
we may not be able to identify suitable candidates on terms acceptable to us and may not achieve expected returns or other benefits as a result of integration challenges, such as personnel and technology.
Failure to qualify as a REIT could have adverse consequences
.
We may not continue to qualify as a REIT in the future. Also, the Internal Revenue Service may challenge our qualification as a REIT for prior years.
For any taxable year we fail to qualify as a REIT and do not qualify under statutory relief provisions:
•
we would be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates, including any applicable alternative minimum tax;
•
we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which we failed to qualify, thereby reducing our net income, including any distributions to shareholders, as we would be required to pay significant income taxes for the year or years involved; and,
•
our ability to expand our business and raise capital would be impaired, which may adversely affect the value of our common shares.
We may face other tax liabilities in the future which may impact our cash flow. These potential tax liabilities may be calculated on our income or property values at either the corporate or individual property levels. Any additional tax expense incurred would decrease the cash available for cash distributions to our common shareholders and non-controlling interest holders. Additionally, in order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute annual dividends to our shareholders equal to a minimum of 90% of our adjusted taxable income.
Tax laws and related interpretations may change at any time, and any such legislative or other actions could have a negative effect on us
.
Tax laws are under constant review by persons involved in the legislative process, at the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and by various state and local tax authorities. Changes to tax laws, regulations, or administrative interpretations, which may be applied retroactively, could adversely affect us in a number of ways, including the following:
5
Table of Contents
•
making it more difficult or more costly for us to qualify as a REIT;
•
decreasing real estate values generally; and,
•
lowering effective tax rates for non-REIT "C" corporations, which may cause investors to perceive investments in REITs to be less attractive than investments in the stock of non-REIT "C" corporations.
We cannot predict whether, when, in what forms, or with what effective dates, the tax laws, regulations, and administrative interpretations applicable to us or our shareholders may be changed. Any such change may significantly affect our liquidity and results of operations, as well as the value of our shares.
Litigation risks could affect our business
.
As a publicly-traded owner, developer and manager of multifamily properties, we may incur liability based on various conditions at our properties and the buildings thereon, and we also have become and in the future may become involved in legal proceedings, including consumer, employment, tort or commercial litigation, which if decided adversely to or settled by us, and not adequately covered by insurance, could result in liability which is material to our financial condition or results of operations.
Damage from catastrophic weather and other natural events could result in losses
.
Certain of our properties are located in areas that may experience catastrophic weather and other natural events from time to time, including fires, snow or ice storms, windstorms, tornadoes or hurricanes, earthquakes, flooding or other severe weather. These adverse weather or natural events could cause substantial damages or losses to our properties which could exceed our insurance coverage. In the event of a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose our capital invested in the affected property, as well as anticipated future revenue from that property. We could also continue to be obligated to repay any mortgage indebtedness or other obligations related to the property. Any such loss could materially and adversely affect our business and our financial condition and results of operations.
A cybersecurity incident and other technology disruptions could negatively impact our business
.
We use technology in substantially all aspects of our business operations. We also use mobile devices, social networking, outside vendors and other online activities to connect with our employees, suppliers and residents. Such uses give rise to potential cybersecurity risks, including security breach, espionage, system disruption, theft and inadvertent release of information. Our business involves the storage and transmission of numerous classes of sensitive and confidential information and intellectual property, including residents' and suppliers' personal information, private information about employees, and financial and strategic information about us. Further, as we pursue our strategy to grow through acquisitions and developments and to pursue new initiatives to improve our operations, we are also expanding our information technologies, resulting in a larger technological presence and corresponding exposure to cybersecurity risk. If we fail to assess and identify cybersecurity risks associated with our operations, we may become increasingly vulnerable to such risks. Additionally, the measures we have implemented to prevent security breaches and cyber incidents may not be effective. The theft, destruction, loss, misappropriation, or release of sensitive data, confidential information or intellectual property, or interference with our information technology systems or the technology systems of third parties on which we rely, could result in business disruption, negative publicity, brand damage, violation of privacy laws, loss of residents, potential liability and competitive disadvantage, any of which could result in a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Our third-party service providers are primarily responsible for the security of their own information technology environments and in certain instances, we rely significantly on third-party service providers to supply and store our sensitive data in a secure manner. All of these third parties face risks relating to cybersecurity similar to ours which could disrupt their businesses and therefore adversely impact us. While we provide guidance and specific requirements in some cases, we do not directly control any of such parties' information technology security operations, or the amount of investment they place in guarding against cybersecurity threats. Accordingly, we are subject to any flaws in or breaches to their information technology systems or those which they operate for us, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Risks Associated with Our Indebtedness and Financing
We have significant debt, which could have adverse consequences
.
As of
December 31, 2016
, we had outstanding debt of approximately
$2.5 billion
. This indebtedness could have adverse consequences, including, but not limited to:
6
Table of Contents
•
if a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness, and if we are unable to meet our mortgage obligations, we could sustain a loss as a result of foreclosure on the mortgaged property;
•
our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions is increased; and
•
our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in business and industry conditions is limited.
The mortgages on our properties subject to secured debt, our unsecured credit facilities, and the indenture under which our unsecured debt was issued, contain customary restrictions, requirements, and other limitations, as well as certain financial and operating covenants including maintenance of certain financial ratios. Maintaining compliance with these provisions could limit our financial flexibility. A default in these provisions, if uncured, could require us to repay the indebtedness before the scheduled maturity date, which could adversely affect our liquidity and increase our financing costs.
Insufficient cash flows could limit our ability to make required payments for debt obligations or pay distributions to shareholders
.
Substantially all of our income is derived from rental and other income from our multifamily communities. As a result, our performance depends in large part on our ability to collect rent from residents, which could be negatively affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:
•
delay in resident lease commencements;
•
decline in occupancy;
•
failure of residents to make rental payments when due;
•
the attractiveness of our properties to residents and potential residents;
•
our ability to adequately manage and maintain our communities;
•
competition from other available apartments and housing alternatives;
•
changes in market rents; and
•
increases in operating expenses.
Cash flow could be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest with respect to debt financing. In order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute annual dividends to our shareholders equal to a minimum of 90% of our adjusted taxable income. This requirement limits the cash available to meet required principal payments on our debt.
Issuances of additional debt may adversely impact our financial condition
.
Our capital requirements depend on numerous factors, including the rental and occupancy rates of our multifamily properties, minimum dividend requirements to our equity holders, development, redevelopment and other capital expenditures, costs of operations, and potential acquisitions. If our capital requirements vary materially from our plans, we may require additional financing earlier than anticipated. If we issue more debt, we could become more leveraged, resulting in increased risk of default on our obligations and an increase in our debt service requirements, both of which could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to access debt and equity capital markets in the future.
We may be unable to renew, repay, or refinance our outstanding debt
.
We are subject to the risk that indebtedness on our properties or our unsecured indebtedness will not be renewed, repaid, or refinanced when due or the terms of any renewal or refinancing will not be as favorable as the existing terms of such indebtedness. If we are unable to refinance our indebtedness on acceptable terms, or at all, we might be forced to dispose of one or more of the properties on disadvantageous terms, which might result in losses to us. Such losses could have a material adverse effect on us and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders and pay amounts due on our debt. Furthermore, if a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet mortgage payments, the mortgagee could foreclose on the property, appoint a receiver and exercise rights under an assignment of rents and leases, or pursue other remedies, all with a consequent loss of our revenues and asset value. Foreclosures could also create taxable income without accompanying cash proceeds, thereby hindering our ability to meet the REIT distribution requirements of the Code.
7
Table of Contents
Rising interest rates could both increase our borrowing costs, thereby adversely affecting our cash flows and the amounts available for distribution to our shareholders, and decrease our share price, if investors seek higher yields through other investments
.
We have mortgage debt with varying interest rates dependent upon various market indexes. In addition, we have an unsecured credit facility bearing interest at variable rates on all amounts drawn. We may incur additional variable rate debt in the future. Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expense, unless we make arrangements which hedge the risk of rising interest rates, and would increase the costs of refinancing existing debt and of issuing new debt. Accordingly, higher interest rates would adversely affect cash flow, net income, and cash available for payment of our debt obligations and distributions to shareholders.
An environment of rising interest rates could also lead holders of our securities to seek higher yields through other investments, which could adversely affect the market price of our shares. One of the factors which may influence the price of our stock in public markets is the annual distribution rate we pay as compared with the yields on alternative investments.
Failure to maintain our current credit ratings could adversely affect our cost of funds, related margins, liquidity, and access to capital markets
.
Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor's, the major debt rating agencies, routinely evaluate our debt and have given us ratings of
A3 with stable outlook, A- with stable outlook, and BBB+ with stable outlook, respectively
, on our senior unsecured debt. These ratings are based on a number of factors, which include their assessment of our financial strength, liquidity, capital structure, asset quality, and sustainability of cash flow and earnings. Due to changes in market conditions, we may not be able to maintain our current credit ratings, which could adversely affect our cost of funds and related margins, liquidity, and access to capital markets.
Risks Associated with Our Shares
Share ownership limits and our ability to issue additional equity securities may prevent takeovers beneficial to shareholders
.
For us to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we must have 100 or more shareholders during the year and not more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals. As defined for federal income tax purposes, the term “individuals” includes a number of specified entities. To minimize the possibility of us failing to qualify as a REIT under this test, our declaration of trust includes restrictions on transfers of our shares and ownership limits. The ownership limits, as well as our ability to issue other classes of equity securities, may delay, defer, or prevent a change in control. These provisions may also deter tender offers for our common shares which may be attractive to you or limit your opportunity to receive a premium for your shares which might otherwise exist if a third party were attempting to effect a change in control transaction.
Our share price will fluctuate
.
The market price and trading volume of our common shares are subject to fluctuation due to general market conditions, the risks discussed in this report and other matters, including, but not limited to, the following:
•
operating results which vary from the expectations of securities analysts and investors;
•
investor interest in our property portfolio;
•
the reputation and performance of REITs;
•
the attractiveness of REITs as compared to other investment vehicles;
•
the results of our financial condition and operations;
•
the perception of our growth and earnings potential;
•
minimum dividend requirements;
•
increases in market interest rates, which may lead purchasers of our common shares to demand a higher yield; and
•
changes in financial markets and national and regional economic and general market conditions.
The form, timing and amount of dividend distributions in future periods may vary and be impacted by economic and other considerations
.
The form, timing and amount of dividend distributions will be declared at the discretion of our Board of Trust Managers and will depend on actual cash from operations, our financial condition, capital requirements, the annual distribution
8
Table of Contents
requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and other factors as the Board of Trust Managers may consider relevant. The Board of Trust Managers may modify the form, timing and amount of dividends from time to time.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
The Properties
Our properties typically consist of mid-rise buildings or two and three story buildings in a landscaped setting and provide residents with a variety of amenities common to multifamily rental properties.
Operating Properties (including properties held through unconsolidated joint ventures)
The
152
operating properties in which we owned interests and operated at
December 31, 2016
averaged
953
square feet of living area per apartment home. For the year ended
December 31, 2016
, no single operating property accounted for greater than
1.7%
of our total revenues. Our operating properties had a weighted average occupancy rate of approximately
95%
and
96%
for each of the years ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively, and an average monthly rental revenue per apartment home of
$1,405
and
$1,342
for the same periods, respectively. Resident lease terms generally range from
six
to
eighteen
months. At
December 31, 2016
,
137
of our operating properties had over 200 apartment homes, with the largest having
1,005
apartment homes. Our operating properties have an average age of
12
years. Our operating properties were constructed and placed in service as follows:
Year Placed in Service
Number of Operating Properties
2012-2016
24
2007-2011
30
2002-2006
32
1997-2001
42
1992-1996
16
Prior to 1991
8
9
Table of Contents
Property Table
The following table sets forth information with respect to our
152
operating properties at
December 31, 2016
:
OPERATING PROPERTIES
Property and Location
Year Placed
in Service
Average Apartment
Size (Sq. Ft.)
Number of
Apartments
2016 Average
Occupancy (1)
2016 Average
Monthly Rental
Rate per
Apartment (2)
ARIZONA
Phoenix/Scottsdale
Camden Chandler (3)
2015
1,146
380
94.1
%
$
1,310
Camden Copper Square
2000
786
332
95.7
1,084
Camden Foothills
2014
1,032
220
92.7
1,490
Camden Hayden
2015
1,043
234
90.6
1,384
Camden Legacy
1996
1,067
428
95.4
1,144
Camden Montierra
1999
1,071
249
95.7
1,266
Camden Pecos Ranch
2001
924
272
95.1
1,002
Camden San Marcos
1995
984
320
95.2
1,144
Camden San Paloma
1993/1994
1,042
324
95.5
1,153
Camden Sotelo
2008/2012
1,303
170
93.2
1,461
CALIFORNIA
Los Angeles/Orange County
Camden Crown Valley
2001
1,009
380
95.7
1,916
Camden Glendale (3)
2015
882
303
95.0
2,241
Camden Harbor View
2004
981
546
95.6
2,412
Camden Main and Jamboree
2008
1,011
290
96.2
2,026
Camden Martinique
1986
795
714
94.8
1,646
Camden Sea Palms
1990
891
138
96.0
1,844
The Camden (4)
2016
768
287
Lease-up
3,064
San Diego/Inland Empire
Camden Landmark
2006
982
469
94.6
1,486
Camden Old Creek
2007
1,037
350
95.5
1,916
Camden Sierra at Otay Ranch
2003
962
422
95.2
1,795
Camden Tuscany
2003
896
160
95.9
2,485
Camden Vineyards
2002
1,053
264
96.0
1,501
COLORADO
Denver
Camden Belleview Station
2009
888
270
94.2
1,374
Camden Caley
2000
925
218
96.0
1,328
Camden Denver West
1997
1,015
320
95.3
1,566
Camden Flatirons (3)
2015
960
424
95.0
1,460
Camden Highlands Ridge
1996
1,149
342
95.3
1,583
Camden Interlocken
1999
1,010
340
95.8
1,470
Camden Lakeway
1997
932
451
95.5
1,399
WASHINGTON DC METRO
Camden Ashburn Farm
2000
1,062
162
96.0
1,542
Camden College Park
2008
942
508
93.0
1,524
Camden Dulles Station
2009
978
382
96.3
1,628
Camden Fair Lakes
1999
1,056
530
95.8
1,715
10
Table of Contents
OPERATING PROPERTIES
Property and Location
Year Placed
in Service
Average Apartment
Size (Sq. Ft.)
Number of
Apartments
2016 Average
Occupancy (1)
2016 Average
Monthly Rental
Rate per
Apartment (2)
Camden Fairfax Corner
2006
934
489
95.6
%
$
1,773
Camden Fallsgrove
2004
996
268
95.5
1,735
Camden Grand Parc
2002
674
105
97.0
2,417
Camden Lansdowne
2002
1,006
690
95.8
1,483
Camden Largo Town Center
2000/2007
1,027
245
94.0
1,616
Camden Monument Place
2007
856
368
95.4
1,524
Camden NoMa
2014
770
321
95.0
2,185
Camden Potomac Yard
2008
835
378
95.5
1,972
Camden Roosevelt
2003
856
198
95.6
2,630
Camden Russett
2000
992
426
94.9
1,451
Camden Silo Creek
2004
975
284
96.1
1,475
Camden South Capitol (5)
2013
821
281
94.3
2,130
FLORIDA
Southeast Florida
Camden Aventura
1995
1,108
379
95.8
1,959
Camden Boca Raton
2014
843
261
95.3
1,945
Camden Brickell
2003
937
405
96.5
2,059
Camden Doral
1999
1,120
260
96.9
1,868
Camden Doral Villas
2000
1,253
232
96.4
1,992
Camden Las Olas
2004
1,043
420
96.3
2,031
Camden Plantation
1997
1,201
502
96.8
1,591
Camden Portofino
1995
1,112
322
96.4
1,598
Orlando
Camden Hunter’s Creek
2000
1,075
270
97.0
1,278
Camden Lago Vista
2005
955
366
96.4
1,130
Camden LaVina
2012
970
420
95.3
1,179
Camden Lee Vista
2000
937
492
96.9
1,082
Camden Orange Court
2008
817
268
95.1
1,288
Camden Town Square
2012
986
438
96.2
1,241
Camden Waterford Lakes (5)
2013
971
300
94.9
1,311
Camden World Gateway
2000
979
408
96.3
1,177
Tampa/St. Petersburg
Camden Bay
1997/2001
943
760
95.6
1,072
Camden Montague
2012
975
192
95.4
1,216
Camden Preserve
1996
942
276
95.6
1,298
Camden Royal Palms
2006
1,017
352
96.2
1,110
Camden Visconti (5)
2007
1,125
450
95.6
1,255
Camden Westchase Park
2012
992
348
95.4
1,347
GEORGIA
Atlanta
Camden Brookwood
2002
912
359
96.2
1,288
Camden Creekstone
2002
990
223
95.6
1,200
Camden Deerfield
2000
1,187
292
95.1
1,324
11
Table of Contents
OPERATING PROPERTIES
Property and Location
Year Placed
in Service
Average Apartment
Size (Sq. Ft.)
Number of
Apartments
2016 Average
Occupancy (1)
2016 Average
Monthly Rental
Rate per
Apartment (2)
Camden Dunwoody
1997
1,007
324
97.0
%
$
1,219
Camden Fourth Ward
2014
847
276
96.2
1,590
Camden Midtown Atlanta
2001
935
296
94.3
1,349
Camden Paces (3)
2015
1,407
379
94.2
2,498
Camden Peachtree City
2001
1,027
399
95.5
1,198
Camden Phipps (5)
1996
1,018
234
94.6
1,467
Camden Shiloh
1999/2002
1,143
232
96.4
1,176
Camden St. Clair
1997
999
336
95.5
1,234
Camden Stockbridge
2003
1,009
304
94.9
926
Camden Vantage
2010
901
592
95.8
1,286
NORTH CAROLINA
Charlotte
Camden Ballantyne
1998
1,048
400
95.5
1,215
Camden Cotton Mills
2002
905
180
96.0
1,448
Camden Dilworth
2006
857
145
96.2
1,431
Camden Fairview
1983
1,036
135
96.6
1,135
Camden Foxcroft
1979
940
156
96.3
994
Camden Foxcroft II (6)
1985
874
100
96.5
1,605
Camden Grandview
2000
1,059
266
95.2
1,065
Camden Sedgebrook
1999
972
368
96.4
1,100
Camden South End
2003
882
299
96.4
1,345
Camden Southline (3) (5)
2015
831
266
95.7
1,414
Camden Stonecrest
2001
1,098
306
95.9
1,263
Camden Touchstone
1986
899
132
96.6
978
Raleigh
Camden Asbury Village (5)
2009
1,009
350
95.4
1,118
Camden Crest
2001
1,013
438
93.8
975
Camden Governor’s Village
1999
1,046
242
96.1
1,001
Camden Lake Pine
1999
1,066
446
95.3
1,041
Camden Manor Park
2006
966
484
96.0
1,014
Camden Overlook
2001
1,060
320
95.8
1,156
Camden Reunion Park
2000/2004
972
420
94.1
918
Camden Westwood
1999
1,027
354
94.4
985
TEXAS
Austin
Camden Amber Oaks (5)
2009
862
348
95.3
1,043
Camden Amber Oaks II (5)
2012
910
244
95.6
1,112
Camden Brushy Creek (5)
2008
882
272
95.8
1,091
Camden Cedar Hills
2008
911
208
95.8
1,220
Camden Gaines Ranch
1997
955
390
96.3
1,348
Camden Huntingdon
1995
903
398
95.5
1,071
Camden La Frontera
2015
901
300
94.9
1,186
Camden Lamar Heights
2015
838
314
94.6
1,436
12
Table of Contents
OPERATING PROPERTIES
Property and Location
Year Placed
in Service
Average Apartment
Size (Sq. Ft.)
Number of
Apartments
2016 Average
Occupancy (1)
2016 Average
Monthly Rental
Rate per
Apartment (2)
Camden Shadow Brook (5)
2009
909
496
95.6
%
$
1,117
Camden Stoneleigh
2001
908
390
95.8
1,208
Corpus Christi
Camden Breakers
1996
868
288
93.5
1,155
Camden Copper Ridge
1986
775
344
92.0
875
Camden Miramar (7)
1994-2014
494
1,005
73.7
1,112
Camden South Bay (5)
2007
1,055
270
93.8
1,260
Dallas/Fort Worth
Camden Addison
1996
942
456
96.8
1,125
Camden Belmont
2010/2012
945
477
95.8
1,431
Camden Buckingham
1997
919
464
95.9
1,151
Camden Centreport
1997
911
268
96.6
1,058
Camden Cimarron
1992
772
286
96.7
1,113
Camden Design District (5)
2009
939
355
96.4
1,351
Camden Farmers Market
2001/2005
932
904
95.5
1,260
Camden Henderson
2012
967
106
95.9
1,540
Camden Legacy Creek
1995
831
240
96.7
1,176
Camden Legacy Park
1996
871
276
97.3
1,177
Camden Panther Creek (5)
2009
946
295
95.6
1,160
Camden Riverwalk (5)
2008
982
600
94.7
1,352
Camden Valley Park
1986
743
516
96.5
1,029
Camden Victory Park (4)
2016
861
423
Lease-Up
1,696
Houston
Camden City Centre
2007
932
379
93.1
1,592
Camden City Centre II
2013
868
268
94.7
1,652
Camden Cypress Creek (5)
2009
993
310
93.9
1,237
Camden Downs at Cinco Ranch (5)
2004
1,075
318
93.7
1,242
Camden Grand Harbor (5)
2008
959
300
94.0
1,167
Camden Greenway
1999
861
756
95.0
1,408
Camden Heights (5)
2004
927
352
93.8
1,515
Camden Holly Springs
1999
934
548
92.9
1,249
Camden Midtown
1999
844
337
91.9
1,652
Camden Northpointe (5)
2008
940
384
94.6
1,104
Camden Oak Crest
2003
870
364
93.7
1,133
Camden Park
1995
866
288
93.7
1,105
Camden Plaza
2007
915
271
95.1
1,573
Camden Post Oak
2003
1,200
356
91.6
2,537
Camden Royal Oaks
2006
923
236
93.0
1,303
Camden Royal Oaks II
2012
1,054
104
90.3
1,512
Camden Spring Creek (5)
2004
1,080
304
93.6
1,227
Camden Stonebridge
1993
845
204
93.8
1,120
Camden Sugar Grove
1997
921
380
93.8
1,156
Camden Travis Street
2010
819
253
93.8
1,552
13
Table of Contents
OPERATING PROPERTIES
Property and Location
Year Placed
in Service
Average Apartment
Size (Sq. Ft.)
Number of
Apartments
2016 Average
Occupancy (1)
2016 Average
Monthly Rental
Rate per
Apartment (2)
Camden Vanderbilt
1996/1997
863
894
94.6
%
$
1,460
Camden Whispering Oaks
2008
934
274
93.5
1,238
Camden Woodson Park (5)
2008
916
248
94.4
1,173
Camden Yorktown (5)
2008
995
306
93.9
1,161
(1)
Represents average physical occupancy for the year except as noted.
(2)
The average monthly rental rate per apartment incorporates vacant units and resident concessions calculated on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease.
(3)
Development property stabilized during
2016
—average occupancy calculated from date at which occupancy exceeded 90% through
December 31, 2016
.
(4)
Property under lease-up at
December 31, 2016
.
(5)
Property owned through an unconsolidated joint venture in which we currently own a 31.3% interest. The remaining interest is owned by an unaffiliated third party.
(6)
Formerly known as Camden Simsbury.
(7)
Miramar is a student housing project for Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi. Average occupancy includes summer months which are normally subject to high vacancies.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
14
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The high and low closing prices per share of our common shares, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape under the symbol “CPT,” and distributions per share declared for the quarters indicated are as follows:
High
Low
Distributions
2016 Quarters:
First
$
84.09
$
70.55
$
0.75
Second
88.42
80.08
0.75
Third
90.67
83.69
5.00
Fourth
84.07
76.00
0.75
2015 Quarters:
First
$
80.92
$
72.37
$
0.70
Second
79.11
73.03
0.70
Third
81.28
69.45
0.70
Fourth
79.04
73.56
0.70
In September 2016, our Board of Trust Managers declared a special dividend of $4.25 per common share to our common shareholders of record as of September 23, 2016, consisting of gains on dispositions of assets completed in 2016. The special dividend was in addition to our quarterly dividend of $0.75 per common share. We also paid equivalent amounts per unit to holders of the common operating partnership units.
In the first quarter of 2017, the Company's Board of Trust Managers maintained the $0.75 quarterly dividend rate per common share. Future dividend payments are paid at the discretion of the Board of Trust Managers and depend on cash flows generated from operations, the Company's financial condition and capital requirements, distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and other factors which may be deemed relevant by our Board of Trust Managers. Assuming similar dividend distributions for the remainder of 2017, our annualized dividend rate for 2017 would be $3.00.
15
Table of Contents
This graph assumes the investment of $100 on December 31, 2011 and quarterly reinvestment of dividends, including the special dividend paid in September 2016. (Source: SNL Financial LC)
Index
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Camden Property Trust
$
113.41
$
98.35
$
132.62
$
143.12
$
170.65
FTSE NAREIT Equity
118.06
120.97
157.43
162.46
176.30
S&P 500
116.00
153.57
174.60
177.01
198.18
Russell 2000
116.35
161.52
169.43
161.95
196.45
As of February 7, 2017, there were approximately 413 shareholders of record and approximately 37,781 beneficial owners of our common shares.
In November 2014, we created an at-the-market share offering program (the "ATM program") through which we can, but have no obligation to, sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to
$331.3 million
,
in amounts and at times as we determine, into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions. Actual sales from time to time may depend on a variety of factors including, among others, market conditions, the trading price of our common shares, and determinations by management of the appropriate sources of funding for us. We intend to use the net proceeds from any future sales under the ATM program for general corporate purposes, which may include reducing future borrowings under our unsecured credit facility, the repayment of other indebtedness, the redemption or other repurchase of outstanding debt or equity securities, funding for development, redevelopment and investment projects and financing for acquisitions.
As of the date of this filing, we had common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to
$315.3 million
remaining available for sale under the ATM program.
No
shares were sold subsequent to
December 31, 2016
through the date of this filing under the ATM program.
16
Table of Contents
See Part III, Item 12, for a description of securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.
In January 2008, our Board of Trust Managers approved a plan to allow for the repurchase of up to $500 million of our common equity securities through open market purchases, block purchases, and privately negotiated transactions. Under this program, we repurchased
4.3 million
shares for a total of approximately
$230.2 million
from April 2007 through December 31, 2008 and there have not been any shares repurchased subsequent to that date. As of the date of this filing, the remaining dollar value of our common equity securities authorized to be repurchased under the program was approximately
$269.8 million
.
17
Table of Contents
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table provides selected financial data relating to our historical financial condition and results of operations as of and for each of the years ended
December 31, 2012
through
2016
. This data should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes. Prior year amounts have been reclassified for discontinued operations.
COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL AND PROPERTY DATA
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts and property data)
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Operating Data (a)
Total property revenues
$
876,447
$
835,618
$
790,263
$
737,033
$
648,041
Total property expenses
311,355
301,000
285,700
266,572
237,715
Total non-property income
14,577
7,332
14,611
21,197
16,407
Total other expenses
425,190
412,022
399,314
377,026
355,672
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders
436,981
229,565
273,892
134,347
140,136
Net income attributable to common shareholders
819,823
249,315
292,089
336,364
283,390
Earnings per common share from continuing operations:
Basic
$
4.81
$
2.55
$
3.08
$
1.50
$
1.64
Diluted
4.79
2.54
3.06
1.50
1.63
Total earnings per common share:
Basic
$
9.08
$
2.77
$
3.29
$
3.82
$
3.35
Diluted
9.05
2.76
3.27
3.78
3.32
Distributions declared per common share
$
3.00
$
2.80
$
2.64
$
2.52
$
2.24
Special dividend per common share (b)
$
4.25
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Balance Sheet Data (at end of year)
Total real estate assets, at cost (c)
$
7,376,690
$
7,387,597
$
7,025,376
$
6,655,139
$
6,262,645
Total assets
6,028,152
6,037,612
6,043,981
5,619,354
5,372,666
Notes payable
2,480,588
2,724,687
2,730,613
2,517,979
2,497,962
Non-qualified deferred compensation share awards
77,037
79,364
68,134
47,180
—
Equity
3,095,553
2,892,896
2,888,409
2,760,181
2,626,708
Other Data
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities
$
443,063
$
423,238
$
418,528
$
404,291
$
324,267
Investing activities (d)
690,412
(293,235
)
(326,587
)
(258,377
)
(526,770
)
Financing activities
(904,237
)
(273,231
)
43,482
(154,181
)
174,928
Funds from operations – diluted (e)
425,464
414,497
378,043
368,321
313,337
Adjusted funds from operations – diluted (e)
366,380
350,328
318,189
301,291
250,292
Property Data
Number of operating properties (at the end of year) (f)
152
172
168
170
193
Number of operating apartment homes (at end of year) (f)
52,793
59,792
58,948
59,899
65,775
Number of operating apartment homes (weighted average) (f) (g)
46,934
47,088
47,915
46,841
43,337
Weighted average monthly total property revenue per apartment home (a)
$
1,556
$
1,479
$
1,374
$
1,311
$
1,246
Properties under development (at end of period)
7
8
13
14
9
(a)
Excludes discontinued operations. See Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements," and Note 7, "Acquisitions, Dispositions, Impairment, and Discontinued Operations," in the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of discontinued operations.
(b)
A special dividend was paid on September 30, 2016. Refer to Note 4 "Common Shares" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the special dividend.
18
Table of Contents
(c)
Includes operating properties held for sale at net book value and excludes discontinued operating properties and joint ventures for all periods presented.
(d)
All periods presented have been changed to reflect our adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2016-18 ("ASU 2016-18"),"Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash (A Consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)", which required retrospective application. See Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements" for further discussion.
(e)
Management considers Funds from Operations (“FFO”) and adjusted FFO ("AFFO") to be appropriate measures of the financial performance of an equity REIT. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) currently defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”)), excluding gains (or losses) associated with previously depreciated operating properties, real estate depreciation and amortization, impairments of depreciable assets, and adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures. Our calculation of diluted FFO also assumes conversion of all potentially dilutive securities, including certain non-controlling interests, which are convertible into common shares. We consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by excluding gains or losses on dispositions of operating properties, and depreciation, FFO can assist in the comparison of the operating performance of a company’s real estate investments between periods or to different companies. AFFO is calculated utilizing FFO less recurring capitalized expenditures which are necessary to help preserve the value of and maintain the functionality at our communities. We also consider AFFO to be a useful supplemental measure because it is frequently used by analysts and investors to evaluate a REIT's operating performance between periods or different companies. Our definition of recurring capital expenditures may differ from other REITs, and there can be no assurance our basis for computing this measure is comparable to other REITs. To facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, we believe FFO and AFFO should be examined in conjunction with net income attributable to common shareholders as presented in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and data included elsewhere in this report. FFO and AFFO are not defined by GAAP and should not be considered alternatives to net income attributable to common shareholders as an indication of our operating performance. Additionally, FFO and AFFO as disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to our calculation. See "Funds from Operations and Adjusted FFO" in Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for reconciliations of net income attributable to common shareholders to FFO and AFFO.
(f)
Includes operating properties held for sale and discontinued operating properties held for sale for all periods presented.
(g)
Excludes apartment homes owned in joint ventures.
19
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this report. Historical results and trends which might appear in the consolidated financial statements should not be interpreted as being indicative of future operations.
We consider portions of this report to be “forward-looking” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, both as amended, with respect to our expectations for future periods. Forward-looking statements do not discuss historical fact, but instead include statements related to expectations, projections, intentions, or other items relating to the future; forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, results, or events. Although we believe the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance our expectations will be achieved. Any statements contained herein which are not statements of historical fact should be deemed forward-looking statements. Reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements as these statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors beyond our control and could differ materially from our actual results and performance.
Factors which may cause our actual results or performance to differ materially from those contemplated by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
Volatility in capital and credit markets, or other unfavorable changes in economic conditions, either nationally or regionally in one or more of the markets in which we operate, could adversely impact us
;
•
Short-term leases expose us to the effects of declining market rents
;
•
Competition could limit our ability to lease apartments or increase or maintain rental income
;
•
We face risks associated with land holdings and related activities
;
•
Potential reforms to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could adversely affect us
;
•
Development, redevelopment and construction risks could impact our profitability
;
•
Investments through joint ventures and discretionary funds involve risks not present in investments in which we are the sole investor
;
•
Competition could adversely affect our ability to acquire properties
;
•
Our acquisition strategy may not produce the cash flows expected
;
•
Failure to qualify as a REIT could have adverse consequences
;
•
Tax laws and related interpretations may change at any time, and any such legislative or other actions could have a negative effect on us
;
•
Litigation risks could affect our business
;
•
Damage from catastrophic weather and other natural events could result in losses
;
•
A cybersecurity incident and other technology disruptions could negatively impact our business
;
•
We have significant debt, which could have adverse consequences
;
•
Insufficient cash flows could limit our ability to make required payments for debt obligations or pay distributions to shareholders
;
•
Issuances of additional debt may adversely impact our financial condition
;
•
We may be unable to renew, repay, or refinance our outstanding debt
;
•
Rising interest rates could both increase our borrowing costs, thereby adversely affecting our cash flows and the amounts available for distribution to our shareholders, and decrease our share price, if investors seek higher yields through other investments
;
•
Failure to maintain our current credit ratings could adversely affect our cost of funds, related margins, liquidity, and access to capital markets
;
•
Share ownership limits and our ability to issue additional equity securities may prevent takeovers beneficial to shareholders
;
•
Our share price will fluctuate
; and
20
Table of Contents
•
The form, timing and amount of dividend distributions in future periods may vary and be impacted by economic and other considerations
.
These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions as of the date of this report, and we assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements because of subsequent events.
Executive Summary
We are primarily engaged in the ownership, management, development, redevelopment, acquisition, and construction of multifamily apartment communities. Overall, we focus on investing in markets characterized by high-growth economic conditions, strong employment, and attractive quality of life which we believe leads to higher demand and retention of our apartments. As of
December 31, 2016
, we owned interests in, operated, or were developing
159
multifamily properties comprised of
55,366
apartment homes across the United States as detailed in the following Property Portfolio table. In addition, we own other land holdings which we may develop into multifamily apartment communities in the future.
Property Operations
Our results for the year ended
December 31, 2016
reflect an increase in same store revenues of
3.9%
as compared to
2015
. This increase was due to higher average rental rates and increased other property income, which we believe were due to, among other matters, the continuation of improving economic conditions, including job growth, favorable demographics, a manageable supply of new multifamily housing, and in part to more individuals choosing to rent versus buy as evidenced by the moderating level of homeownership rates, all of which have resulted in higher rental rates. We believe U.S. economic and employment growth is likely to continue during
2017
and the supply of new multifamily homes, although increasing, will likely remain at manageable levels. If economic conditions were to worsen, our operating results could be adversely affected.
Construction Activity
At
December 31, 2016
, we had
seven
projects under construction to be comprised of
2,573
apartment homes, with stabilization expected to be completed within the next 42 months. As of
December 31, 2016
, we estimate the additional cost to complete the construction of the
seven
projects to be approximately
$240.6 million
.
Acquisitions
During the year ended
December 31, 2016
, we acquired an aggregate of approximately of 4.6 acres of land located in Denver, Colorado and Charlotte, North Carolina for approximately $19.9 million.
All of the land parcels acquired in 2016 are currently in development as of
December 31, 2016
.
Dispositions
Operating properties:
During the year ended
December 31, 2016
, we sold
one
dual-phased property and
six
other operating properties comprised of an aggregate of
3,184
apartment homes with an average age of
24
years, located in Landover and Frederick, Maryland; Fullerton, California; and Tampa, Altamonte Springs, and St. Petersburg, Florida for an aggregate of approximately
$523.4 million
, and recognized a gain of approximately
$294.9 million
.
Land:
During 2016, we also sold approximately 6.3 acres of land adjacent to an operating property in Tampa, Florida for approximately $2.2 million and recognized a gain of approximately $0.4 million.
Discontinued operations:
In April 2016, we sold 15 operating properties, comprised of an aggregate of 4,918 apartment homes with an average age of 23 years, a retail center and approximately 19.6 acres of land, all located in Las Vegas, Nevada, to an unaffiliated third party for an aggregate of approximately $630.0 million and recognized a gain of approximately $375.2 million.
Future Outlook
Subject to market conditions, we intend to continue to seek opportunities to develop, redevelop and acquire existing communities. We also intend to evaluate our operating property and land development portfolio and plan to continue our practice of selective dispositions as market conditions warrant and opportunities arise. We further intend to strengthen our capital and liquidity positions by continuing to focus on our core fundamentals which currently are generating positive cash flows from operations, maintaining appropriate debt levels and leverage ratios, and controlling overhead costs. We anticipate meeting our near-term liquidity requirements
through a combination of one or more of the following: cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash flows generated from operations, draws on our unsecured credit facility, proceeds from property dispositions, the use of debt and equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement, equity issued from our ATM program, other unsecured borrowings, and secured mortgages.
21
Table of Contents
As of
December 31, 2016
, we had approximately
$237.4 million
in cash and cash equivalents, $100.0 million in short-term investments, and no balance outstanding on our $600 million unsecured credit facility. As of the date of this filing, we had common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to
$315.3 million
remaining available for sale under our ATM program. We believe payments of debt in
2017
are manageable at approximately
$276.0 million
which represents approximately 11.1% of our total outstanding debt, and includes scheduled principal amortization of approximately $1.2 million.
We believe we are well-positioned with a strong balance sheet and sufficient liquidity to cover near-term debt maturities and new development, redevelopment, and other capital funding requirements. We will, however, continue to assess and take further actions we believe are prudent to meet our objectives and capital requirements.
Property Portfolio
Our multifamily property portfolio is summarized as follows:
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
Apartment
Homes
Properties
Apartment
Homes
Properties
Operating Properties
Houston, Texas
8,434
24
8,434
24
Dallas, Texas
5,666
14
5,243
13
Washington, D.C. Metro (1)
5,635
16
6,405
19
Atlanta, Georgia
4,246
13
4,246
13
Austin, Texas
3,360
10
3,360
10
Raleigh, North Carolina
3,054
8
3,054
8
Orlando, Florida
2,962
8
3,540
9
Phoenix, Arizona
2,929
10
2,549
9
Southeast Florida
2,781
8
2,781
8
Charlotte, North Carolina
2,753
12
2,753
12
Los Angeles/Orange County, California
2,658
7
2,784
7
Tampa, Florida
2,378
6
3,788
9
Denver, Colorado
2,365
7
2,365
7
Corpus Christi, Texas
1,907
4
1,907
4
San Diego/Inland Empire, California
1,665
5
1,665
5
Las Vegas, Nevada (2)
—
—
4,918
15
Total Operating Properties
52,793
152
59,792
172
Properties Under Construction
Washington, D.C. Metro
1,227
3
862
2
Phoenix, Arizona
441
1
380
1
Charlotte, North Carolina
323
1
323
1
Houston, Texas
315
1
315
1
Denver, Colorado
267
1
267
1
Dallas, Texas
—
—
423
1
Los Angeles/Orange County, California
—
—
287
1
Total Properties Under Construction
2,573
7
2,857
8
Total Properties
55,366
159
62,649
180
22
Table of Contents
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
Apartment
Homes
Properties
Apartment
Homes
Properties
Less: Unconsolidated Joint Venture Properties
(3)
Houston, Texas
2,522
8
2,522
8
Austin, Texas
1,360
4
1,360
4
Dallas, Texas
1,250
3
1,250
3
Tampa, Florida
450
1
450
1
Raleigh, North Carolina
350
1
350
1
Orlando, Florida
300
1
300
1
Washington, D.C. Metro
(1)
281
1
276
1
Corpus Christi, Texas
270
1
270
1
Charlotte, North Carolina
266
1
266
1
Atlanta, Georgia
234
1
234
1
Total Unconsolidated Joint Venture Properties
7,283
22
7,278
22
Total Properties Fully Consolidated
48,083
137
55,371
158
(1)
In August 2016, one of the Funds completed the conversion of retail space to five apartment homes at one of its operating properties.
(2)
These 15 operating properties were sold to an unaffiliated third party on April 26, 2016.
(3)
Refer to Note 8, "Investments in Joint Ventures," in the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our joint venture investments.
Dispositions
Disposition of Consolidated Operating Properties
During the year ended
December 31, 2016
, we sold
one
dual-phased property and six operating properties, with an average age of
24
years, as follows:
Dispositions of Consolidated Operating Properties
Location
Number of Apartment Homes
Date of Disposition
Camden Westshore
Tampa, FL
278
6/28/2016
Camden Clearbrook
Frederick, MD
297
7/11/2016
Camden Summerfield
Landover, MD
291
7/11/2016
Camden Summerfield II
Landover, MD
187
7/11/2016
Camden Woods
Tampa, FL
444
8/9/2016
Camden Renaissance
Altamonte Springs, FL
578
8/22/2016
Camden Parkside
Fullerton, CA
421
8/31/2016
Camden Lakes
St. Petersburg, FL
688
9/27/2016
Consolidated total
3,184
Discontinued Operations
On April 26, 2016, we sold
15
operating properties, comprised of an aggregate of
4,918
apartment homes, with an average age of
23
years, a retail center and approximately
19.6
acres of land, all located in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Stabilized Communities
We generally consider a property stabilized once it reaches 90% occupancy. During the year ended
December 31, 2016
, stabilization was achieved at four consolidated operating properties and one unconsolidated operating property as follows:
23
Table of Contents
Stabilized Property and Location
Number of
Apartment
Homes
Date of
Construction
Completion
Date of
Stabilization
Consolidated Operating Properties
Camden Flatirons
Denver, CO
424
3Q15
1Q16
Camden Paces
Atlanta, GA
379
4Q15
2Q16
Camden Glendale
Glendale, CA
303
3Q15
3Q16
Camden Chandler
Chandler, AZ
380
1Q16
4Q16
Consolidated total
1,486
Unconsolidated Operating Property
Camden Southline
Charlotte, NC
266
4Q15
1Q16
Completed Construction in Lease-Up
At
December 31, 2016
, we had two consolidated completed operating properties in lease-up as follows:
($ in millions)
Property and Location
Number of
Apartment
Homes
Cost
Incurred
(1)
% Leased at 2/4/2017
Date of Construction Completion
Estimated Date of Stabilization
Consolidated Operating Properties
The Camden
Hollywood, CA
287
$
133.7
88
%
4Q16
2Q17
Camden Victory Park
Dallas, TX
423
84.6
80
%
3Q16
4Q17
Consolidated total
710
$
218.3
(1) Excludes leasing costs, which are expensed as incurred.
Properties Under Development and Land
Our consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2016
included approximately
$442.3 million
related to properties under development and land. Of this amount, approximately
$316.3 million
related to our projects currently under construction. In addition, we had approximately
$126.0 million
primarily invested in land held for future development and land holdings, which included approximately
$114.9 million
related to projects we expect to begin constructing during the next two years, and approximately
$11.1 million
invested in land which we may develop in the future.
24
Table of Contents
Communities Under Construction.
At
December 31, 2016
, we had
seven
consolidated properties in various stages of construction as follows:
($ in millions)
Property and Location
Number of
Apartment
Homes
Estimated
Cost
Cost
Incurred
Included in
Properties
Under
Development
Estimated
Date of
Construction
Completion
Estimated
Date of
Stabilization
Consolidated Communities Under Construction
Camden Gallery
Charlotte, NC (1)
323
$
60.0
$
58.4
$
1.3
1Q17
2Q17
Camden Lincoln Station
Denver, CO (2)
267
56.0
50.5
32.5
2Q17
1Q18
Camden NoMa II
Washington, DC
405
115.0
99.3
99.3
4Q17
4Q19
Camden Shady Grove
Rockville, MD
457
116.0
90.3
90.3
1Q18
4Q19
Camden McGowen Station
Houston, TX
315
90.0
35.6
35.6
2Q18
3Q19
Camden Washingtonian
Gaithersburg, MD
365
90.0
31.8
31.8
4Q18
4Q19
Camden North End I
Phoenix, AZ
441
105.0
25.5
25.5
2Q19
2Q20
Consolidated total
2,573
$
632.0
$
391.4
$
316.3
(1) Property in lease-up and was
85%
leased at February 4, 2017.
(2) Property in lease-up and was
33%
leased at February 4, 2017.
Development Pipeline Communities
. At
December 31, 2016
, we had the following consolidated communities undergoing development activities:
($ in millions)
Property and Location
Projected
Homes
Total Estimated
Cost
(1)
Cost to Date
Camden Grandview II
28
$
21.0
$
6.1
Charlotte, NC
Camden Buckhead
375
104.0
14.8
Atlanta, GA
Camden RiNo
230
70.0
17.0
Denver, CO
Camden Gallery II
5
3.0
1.0
Charlotte, NC
Camden Arts District
354
150.0
16.8
Los Angeles, CA
Camden Conte
(2)
519
170.0
22.4
Houston, TX
Camden North End II
326
73.0
11.5
Phoenix, AZ
Camden Atlantic
286
62.0
14.2
Plantation, FL
Camden Paces III
350
100.0
11.1
Atlanta, GA
Total
2,473
$
753.0
$
114.9
(1)
Represents our estimate of total costs we expect to incur on these projects. However, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, results, or events. Although we believe these expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions, future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted, and estimates routinely require adjustment.
(2)
Anticipated to be developed in two phases. The estimated units, estimated cost, and cost to date represent both phases.
25
Table of Contents
Land Holdings.
At
December 31, 2016
, we had the following investment in land:
($ in millions)
Location
Acres
Cost to Date
Phoenix, AZ
(c)
14.0
$
11.1
Geographic Diversification
At
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, our real estate assets by various markets, excluding depreciation, investments in joint ventures and properties held for sale, were as follows:
($ in thousands)
2016
2015
Washington, D.C. Metro
$
1,417,255
19.2
%
$
1,433,339
19.4
%
Houston, Texas
766,801
10.4
730,576
9.9
Los Angeles/Orange County, California
709,210
9.6
740,976
10.0
Atlanta, Georgia
626,483
8.5
615,972
8.3
Southeast Florida
565,369
7.7
558,521
7.5
Dallas, Texas
493,477
6.7
470,629
6.4
Phoenix, Arizona
492,251
6.7
478,373
6.5
Denver, Colorado
440,296
6.0
383,280
5.2
Charlotte, North Carolina
371,009
5.0
351,661
4.8
Orlando, Florida
341,727
4.6
387,547
5.2
San Diego/Inland Empire, California
330,961
4.5
328,381
4.4
Raleigh, North Carolina
268,230
3.6
263,185
3.6
Austin, Texas
230,351
3.1
229,306
3.1
Tampa, Florida
221,428
3.0
315,643
4.3
Corpus Christi, Texas
101,842
1.4
100,208
1.4
Total
$
7,376,690
100.0
%
$
7,387,597
100.0
%
Results of Operations
Changes in revenues and expenses related to our operating properties from period to period are due primarily to the performance of stabilized properties in the portfolio, the lease-up of newly constructed properties, acquisitions, and dispositions. Where appropriate, comparisons of income and expense for communities included in continuing operations are made on a dollars-per-weighted average apartment home basis in order to adjust for such changes in the number of apartment homes owned during each period. Selected weighted averages for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
2016
2015
2014
Average monthly property revenue per apartment home
$
1,556
$
1,479
$
1,374
Annualized total property expenses per apartment home
$
6,634
$
6,392
$
5,963
Weighted average number of operating apartment homes owned 100%
46,934
47,088
47,915
Weighted average occupancy of operating apartment homes owned 100% *
95.3
%
95.7
%
95.8
%
* Our one student housing community is excluded from this calculation.
Management considers property net operating income ("NOI") to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance to net income because it reflects the operating performance of our communities without an allocation of corporate level property management overhead or general and administrative costs. We define NOI as total property income less property operating and maintenance expenses less real estate taxes. NOI is further detailed in the Property-Level NOI table as seen below. NOI is not defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our operating performance, should not be considered an alternative to net cash from operating activities as a measure of liquidity, or an indication of cash available to fund cash needs. Additionally, NOI as disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to our calculation.
26
Table of Contents
Reconciliations of net income to NOI for the year ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
are as follows:
(in thousands)
2016
2015
2014
Net income
$838,226
$258,262
$
301,314
Less: Fee and asset management income
(6,864
)
(6,999
)
(9,832
)
Less: Interest and other income
(2,202
)
(597
)
(842
)
Less: Income/(loss) on deferred compensation plans
(5,511
)
264
(3,937
)
Plus: Property management expense
25,125
23,055
22,070
Plus: Fee and asset management expense
3,848
4,742
5,341
Plus: General and administrative expense
47,415
46,233
51,005
Plus: Interest expense
93,145
97,312
94,906
Plus: Depreciation and amortization expense
250,146
240,944
222,055
Plus: Expense/(benefit) on deferred compensation plans
5,511
(264
)
3,937
Less: Gain on sale of operating properties, including land
(295,397
)
(104,288
)
(159,289
)
Plus: Impairment associated with land holdings
—
—
1,152
Less: Equity in income of joint ventures
(7,125
)
(6,168
)
(7,023
)
Plus: Income tax expense
1,617
1,872
1,903
Less: Income from discontinued operations
(7,605
)
(19,750
)
(18,197
)
Less: Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
(375,237
)
—
—
Net operating income
$
565,092
$
534,618
$
504,563
Property-Level NOI
(1)
Property NOI, as reconciled above, is detailed further into the following categories for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to
2015
and for the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to
2014
:
Apartment
Homes at
Year Ended
December 31,
Change
($ in thousands)
12/31/2016
2016
2015
$
%
Property revenues:
Same store communities
40,221
$
746,101
$
718,234
$
27,867
3.9
%
Non-same store communities
4,579
84,510
60,596
23,914
39.5
Development and lease-up communities
3,283
9,399
1
9,398
*
Dispositions/other
—
36,437
56,787
(20,350
)
(35.8
)
Total property revenues
48,083
$
876,447
$
835,618
$
40,829
4.9
%
Property expenses:
Same store communities
40,221
$
263,768
$
257,988
$
5,780
2.2
%
Non-same store communities
4,579
30,907
23,169
7,738
33.4
Development and lease-up communities
3,283
4,363
8
4,355
*
Dispositions/other
—
12,317
19,835
(7,518
)
(37.9
)
Total property expenses
48,083
$
311,355
$
301,000
$
10,355
3.4
%
Property NOI:
Same store communities
40,221
$
482,333
$
460,246
$
22,087
4.8
%
Non-same store communities
4,579
53,603
37,427
16,176
43.2
Development and lease-up communities
3,283
5,036
(7
)
5,043
*
Dispositions/other
—
24,120
36,952
(12,832
)
(34.7
)
Total property NOI
48,083
$
565,092
$
534,618
$
30,474
5.7
%
* Not a meaningful percentage.
27
Table of Contents
(1)
Same store communities are communities we owned and were stabilized as of January 1, 2015, excluding assets held for sale. Non-same store communities are stabilized communities not owned or stabilized as of January 1, 2015, excluding assets held for sale. Management believes same store information is useful as it allows both management and investors to determine financial results over a particular period for the same set of communities. Development and lease-up communities are non-stabilized communities we have acquired or developed since January 1, 2015, excluding assets held for sale. Dispositions/other includes those communities disposed of or held for sale which are not classified as discontinued operations. Other includes non-multifamily rental properties, below market lease amortization related to acquired communities, and expenses related to land holdings not under active development.
Apartment
Homes at
Year Ended
December 31,
Change
($ in thousands)
12/31/2015
2015
2014
$
%
Property revenues:
Same store communities
42,700
$
752,983
$
716,613
$
36,370
5.1
%
Non-same store communities
3,790
59,413
30,397
29,016
95.5
Development and lease-up communities
3,963
14,548
1,295
13,253
*
Dispositions/other
—
8,674
41,958
(33,284
)
(79.3
)
Total property revenues
50,453
$
835,618
$
790,263
$
45,355
5.7
%
Property expenses:
Same store communities
42,700
$
269,445
$
256,395
$
13,050
5.1
%
Non-same store communities
3,790
22,038
11,117
10,921
98.2
Development and lease-up communities
3,963
6,069
301
5,768
*
Dispositions/other
—
3,448
17,887
(14,439
)
(80.7
)
Total property expenses
50,453
$
301,000
$
285,700
$
15,300
5.4
%
Property NOI:
Same store communities
42,700
$
483,538
$
460,218
$
23,320
5.1
%
Non-same store communities
3,790
$
37,375
$
19,280
$
18,095
93.9
%
Development and lease-up communities
3,963
$
8,479
$
994
$
7,485
*
Dispositions/other
—
$
5,226
$
24,071
$
(18,845
)
(78.3
)%
Total property NOI
50,453
$
534,618
$
504,563
$
30,055
6.0
%
* Not a meaningful percentage.
(1)
Same store communities are communities we owned and were stabilized as of January 1, 2014, excluding assets held for sale. Non-same store communities are stabilized communities not owned or stabilized as of January 1, 2014, excluding assets held for sale. Management believes same store information is useful as it allows both management and investors to determine financial results over a particular period for the same set of communities. Development and lease-up communities are non-stabilized communities we have acquired or developed since January 1, 2014, excluding assets held for sale. Dispositions/other includes those communities disposed of or held for sale which are not classified as discontinued operations. Other includes non-multifamily rental properties, below market lease amortization related to acquired communities, and expenses related to land holdings not under active development.
Same Store Analysis
Same store property NOI increased approximately
$22.1 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to the same period in
2015
. This increase was due to an increase of approximately
$27.9 million
in same store property revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2016
, partially offset by an increase of approximately
$5.8 million
in same store property expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2016
, as compared to the same period in
2015
.
The
$27.9 million
increase in same store property revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to the same period in 2015, was due in part to an increase in same store rental revenues of approximately $17.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2016
, which was primarily due to a 3.2% increase in average rental rates for our same store portfolio for the year ended
December 31, 2016
, as compared to the same period in
2015
. The increase in same store property revenue was also due to an increase of approximately $10.5 million in other property revenue for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to the same period in
2015
, primarily due to increases in income from our bulk internet rebilling program and miscellaneous fee income.
28
Table of Contents
The
$5.8 million
increase in same store property expense for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to the same period in
2015
, was primarily due to increased costs associated with our bulk internet rebilling program and a $2.5 million, or 2.8%, increase in real estate taxes as a result of higher property valuations at a number of our communities. These increases were partially offset by decreased property insurance expenses during the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to the same period in
2015
.
Same store property NOI increased approximately
$23.3 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to the same period in
2014
. This increase was due to an increase of approximately
$36.4 million
in same store property revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2015
, partially offset by an increase of approximately
$13.1 million
in same store property expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2015
, as compared to the same period in
2014
.
The
$36.4 million
increase in same store property revenue during the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to the same period in
2014
, was due in part to an increase in same store rental revenues of approximately $26.5 million during the year ended
December 31, 2015
, which was primarily due to a 4.1% increase in average rental rates for our same store portfolio during the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to the same period in
2014
. The increase in same store property revenue was also due to an increase of approximately $9.9 million in other property revenue during the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to the same period in
2014
, primarily due to increases in income from our bulk internet rebilling program and miscellaneous fee income.
The
$13.1 million
increase in same store property expense during the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to the same period in 2014, was primarily due to a $5.8 million, or 6.6%, increase in real estate taxes as a result of higher property valuations at a number of our communities as well as increased costs associated with our bulk internet rebilling program.
Non-same Store and Development and Lease-up Analysis
Property NOI from non-same store and development and lease-up communities increased approximately
$21.2 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to the same period in
2015
. The increase was due to an increase of approximately
$33.3 million
in revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2016
, partially offset by an increase of approximately
$12.1 million
in expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2016
, as compared to the same period in
2015
. The increases in property revenues and expenses from our non-same store communities were primarily due to the stabilization of five operating properties in
2015
and four operating properties in
2016
. The increases in property revenues and expenses from our development and lease-up communities were primarily due to the completion and partial lease up of three properties during
2015
and two properties during
2016
, and the partial lease-up of two properties which were under construction at
December 31, 2016
.
Property NOI from non-same store and development and lease-up communities increased approximately
$25.6 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to the same period in
2014
. The increase was due to an increase of approximately
$42.3 million
in revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2015
, partially offset by an increase of approximately
$16.7 million
in expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2015
, as compared to the same period in
2014
. The increases in property revenues and expenses from our non-same store communities were primarily due to the stabilization of one operating property in
2014
and five operating properties in
2015
, and the acquisition of one operating property in
2014
. The increases in property revenues and expenses from our development and lease-up communities were primarily due to the completion and partial lease up of three properties in
2015
and the partial lease-up of one property which was under construction at
December 31, 2015
.
Dispositions/Other Property Analysis
Dispositions/other property NOI decreased approximately
$12.8 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to the same period in
2015
. The decrease was primarily due to the disposition of three operating properties in
2015
, and the disposition of one dual-phase operating property and six other operating properties in
2016
.
Dispositions/other property NOI decreased approximately
$18.8 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to the same period in
2014
. The decrease was primarily due to the disposition of five operating properties in
2014
and three operating properties in
2015
.
29
Table of Contents
Non-Property Income
Year Ended
December 31,
Change
Year Ended
December 31,
Change
($ in thousands)
2016
2015
$
%
2015
2014
$
%
Fee and asset management
$
6,864
$
6,999
$
(135
)
(1.9
)%
$
6,999
$
9,832
$
(2,833
)
(28.8
)%
Interest and other income
2,202
597
1,605
268.8
597
842
(245
)
(29.1
)
Income (loss) on deferred compensation plans
5,511
(264
)
5,775
*
(264
)
3,937
(4,201
)
(106.7
)
Total non-property income
$
14,577
$
7,332
$
7,245
98.8
%
$
7,332
$
14,611
$
(7,279
)
(49.8
)%
Fee and asset management income, which represents income related to property management of our joint ventures and fees from third-party construction projects,
decreased
approximately
$0.1 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to
2015
and decreased approximately
$2.8 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to
2014
. The slight decrease for
2016
as compared to
2015
was primarily due to a decrease in development and construction fees earned due to the timing of the commencement and completion of the development of one community by one of our Funds in 2015, partially offset by higher third-party construction activity. The decrease for
2015
as compared to
2014
was primarily due to lower development and construction fees earned due to the timing of development communities started and completed by our Funds during 2014 and 2015, and our increase in ownership interest in two of the Funds from 20% to 31.3% effective December 23, 2014. We eliminate fee income provided by our Funds to the extent of our ownership.
Interest and other income
increased
approximately
$1.6 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
, as compared to 2015, and was relatively flat for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to 2014. The increase for 2016 was due to higher interest income earned on investments in cash and short-term investments due to an increase in average cash balances and an increase in interest income earned due to higher average note receivable balances outstanding on our real estate secured loans to unaffiliated third parties in 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015.
Our deferred compensation plans recognized income of approximately
$5.5 million
in
2016
, a loss of approximately
$0.3 million
in
2015
and income of approximately
$3.9 million
in
2014
. These changes were related to the performance of the investments held in deferred compensation plans for participants and were directly offset by the expense (benefit) related to these plans, as discussed below.
Other Expenses
Year Ended
December 31,
Change
Year Ended
December 31,
Change
($ in thousands)
2016
2015
$
%
2015
2014
$
%
Property management
$
25,125
$
23,055
$
2,070
9.0
%
$
23,055
$
22,070
$
985
4.5
%
Fee and asset management
3,848
4,742
(894
)
(18.9
)
4,742
5,341
(599
)
(11.2
)
General and administrative
47,415
46,233
1,182
2.6
46,233
51,005
(4,772
)
(9.4
)
Interest
93,145
97,312
(4,167
)
(4.3
)
97,312
94,906
2,406
2.5
Depreciation and amortization
250,146
240,944
9,202
3.8
240,944
222,055
18,889
8.5
Expense (benefit) on deferred compensation plans
5,511
(264
)
5,775
*
(264
)
3,937
(4,201
)
(106.7
)
Total other expenses
$
425,190
$
412,022
$
13,168
3.2
%
$
412,022
$
399,314
$
12,708
3.2
%
Property management expense, which primarily represents regional supervision and accounting costs related to property operations,
increased
approximately
$2.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to
2015
and increased approximately
$1.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to
2014
. These increases were primarily due to increases in salaries, benefits, and incentive compensation expenses. Property management expenses were
2.9%
of total property revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2016
and were
2.8%
of total property revenues for each of the years ended
December 31, 2015
and
2014
.
Fee and asset management expense, which represents expenses related to property management of our joint ventures and fees from third-party construction projects,
decreased
approximately
$0.9 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to
2015
and
decreased
approximately
$0.6 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to
2014
. The
decrease
for
2016
as compared to
2015
was primarily due to lower professional fees incurred in managing our joint ventures
30
Table of Contents
and lower expenses incurred as a result of decreases in development and construction activity relating to the timing of one development community started and completed by one of the Funds in 2015. The
decrease
was partially offset by higher expenses relating to an increase in third-party construction activity in 2016 as compared to 2015. The
decrease
for
2015
as compared to
2014
was primarily due to lower expenses directly related to lower net revenues resulting from our change in ownership interest in two of the Funds effective December 23, 2014.
General and administrative expenses
increased
approximately
$1.2 million
during the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to
2015
and
decreased
approximately
$4.8 million
during the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to
2014
. General and administrative expenses were
5.4%
,
5.5%
and
6.4%
of total revenues, excluding income (loss) on deferred compensation plans, for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively. The
increase
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to
2015
was primarily due to increases in salaries, benefits, and incentive compensation expenses due to higher deferred compensation amortization costs resulting from the accelerated vesting relating to certain trust managers and executive officers meeting the retirement eligibility and service requirements as defined in the 2011 Share Incentive Plan of Camden Property Trust, and an increase in the value of awards granted in 2016 as compared to the value of awards which vested during the same period in 2015.
The
decrease
in general and administrative expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to 2014 was primarily due to approximately $10.0 million in one-time bonuses paid to employees in 2014 relating to the restructuring of the Funds in December 2014. Excluding the $10.0 million one-time bonus paid in 2014, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $5.2 million in 2015 as compared to 2014, which was primarily related to an increase in salaries, benefits and incentive compensation expenses, partially offset by a slight decrease in professional fees.
Interest expense
decreased
approximately
$4.2 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to
2015
and
increased
approximately
$2.4 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to
2014
. The
decrease
in interest expense in
2016
as compared to
2015
was primarily due to the repayment of a $250.0 million, 5.08% senior unsecured note payable in June 2015. The
decrease
was partially offset by lower capitalized interest during the year ended
December 31, 2016
, resulting from lower average balances in our development pipeline, and higher interest expense recognized on our variable rate debt due to higher weighted average interest rates in
2016
as compared to the same period in
2015
.
The
increase
in interest expense in
2015
as compared to
2014
was primarily due to increased interest expense from the issuance of a $250.0 million, 3.68% senior unsecured note payable in September 2014, and lower capitalized interest of approximately $2.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2015, resulting from lower average balances in our development pipeline. The
increase
in 2015 was also due to an increase in interest expense relating to borrowings on our unsecured credit facility and unsecured short-term borrowing facility as compared to the same period in 2014. The
increase
in 2015 was partially offset by the repayment of a $250.0 million, 5.08% senior unsecured note payable in June 2015 and the repayment of two secured notes payable in April and September of 2014.
Depreciation and amortization expense
increased
approximately
$9.2 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to
2015
and
increased
approximately
$18.9 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to
2014
. The
increase
in 2016 as compared to 2015 was primarily due to the completion of units in our development pipeline, the completion of repositions, and increases in capital improvements placed in service during
2016
and
2015
. The
increase
was partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense related to the disposition of one operating property during the fourth quarter of 2015, and the dispositions of one dual-phased operating property and six other operating properties in
2016
.
The
increase
in depreciation and amortization expense in 2015 as compared to 2014 was primarily due to the completion of units in our development pipeline, the completion of repositions, increases in capital improvements placed in service during 2014 and
2015
, and the acquisition of one operating property in October 2014. The
increase
was partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense related to the dispositions of five operating properties in 2014 and three operating properties in 2015.
Our deferred compensation plans incurred an expense of approximately
$5.5 million
in 2016, a benefit of approximately
$0.3 million
in
2015
and an expense of
$3.9 million
in
2014
. These changes were related to the performance of the investments held in deferred compensation plans for participants and were directly offset by the income (loss) related to these plans, as discussed in the non-property income section above.
31
Table of Contents
Other
Year Ended
December 31,
Change
Year Ended
December 31,
Change
(in thousands)
2016
2015
$
2015
2014
$
Gain on sale of operating properties, including land
$
295,397
$
104,288
$
191,109
$
104,288
$
159,289
$
(55,001
)
Impairment associated with land holdings
—
—
—
—
(1,152
)
1,152
Equity in income of joint ventures
7,125
6,168
957
6,168
7,023
(855
)
Income tax expense
(1,617
)
(1,872
)
255
(1,872
)
(1,903
)
31
During the year ended
December 31, 2016
we recognized an approximate
$294.9 million
gain related to the sale of
one
dual-phased property and
six
other operating properties. During the year ended
December 31, 2015
, we recognized an approximate
$104.0 million
gain related to the sale of three operating properties. For the year ended 2016, we also sold
6.3
acres of land adjacent to an operating property in Tampa, Florida for a gain of approximately
$0.4 million
and for the year ended 2015, we sold
two
land holdings adjacent to operating properties in Dallas and Houston, Texas for a gain of approximately
$0.3 million
.
During the year ended December 31,
2014
, we recognized an approximate $155.7 million gain related to the sales of five operating properties and the sale of approximately 29.3 acres located adjacent to current operating and development communities for a gain on the sale of land of approximately $3.6 million. The $1.2 million impairment associated with land holdings in 2014 reflects the difference between the land holding's carrying value and the sales price.
Equity in income of joint ventures
increased
approximately
$1.0 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to
2015
, and decreased approximately
$0.9 million
for the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to
2014
. The increase in 2016 was primarily due to an increase in earnings resulting from higher rental and other property revenues from the operating properties owned by the Funds and the stabilization of one operating property owned by one of the Funds during the first quarter of 2016. The increase was partially offset by higher real estate taxes as a result of increased property valuations at a number of the communities owned by the Funds. The increase was further offset by an increase in interest expense incurred during the year ended December 31, 2016 resulting from interest capitalized during the year ended December 31, 2015 while a property was under construction.
The decrease in equity in income of joint ventures in 2015 as compared to 2014 was primarily due to the recognition of a $3.6 million proportionate share of the gain relating to the sale of two operating properties by the Funds in 2014. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in earnings resulting from our increase in ownership interest in two of the Funds from 20% to 31.3% effective December 23, 2014. The decrease was further offset by an increase in earnings resulting from higher rental income from the stabilized operating properties owned by the Funds and two operating properties owned by the Funds reaching stabilization during the third quarter of 2014.
Funds from Operations (“FFO”) and Adjusted FFO ("AFFO")
Management considers FFO and AFFO to be appropriate measures of the financial performance of an equity REIT. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) currently defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) associated with the sale of previously depreciated operating properties, real estate depreciation and amortization, impairments of depreciable assets, and adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures to reflect FFO on the same basis. Our calculation of diluted FFO also assumes conversion of all potentially dilutive securities, including certain non-controlling interests, which are convertible into common shares. We consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by excluding gains or losses on dispositions of operating properties and depreciation, FFO can assist in the comparison of the operating performance of a company’s real estate investments between periods or to different companies.
AFFO is calculated utilizing FFO less recurring capitalized expenditures which are necessary to help preserve the value of and maintain the functionality at our communities. We also consider AFFO to be a useful supplemental measure because it is frequently used by analysts and investors to evaluate a REIT's operating performance between periods or different companies. Our definition of recurring capital expenditures may differ from other REITs, and there can be no assurance our basis for computing this measure is comparable to other REITs.
To facilitate a clear understanding of our consolidated historical operating results, we believe FFO and AFFO should be examined in conjunction with net income attributable to common shareholders as presented in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and data included elsewhere in this report. FFO and AFFO are not defined by GAAP and should not be considered alternatives to net income attributable to common shareholders as an indication of our operating performance. Additionally, FFO and AFFO as disclosed by other REITs may not be comparable to our calculation.
32
Table of Contents
Reconciliations of net income attributable to common shareholders to FFO and AFFO for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
($ in thousands)
2016
2015
2014
Funds from operations
Net income attributable to common shareholders
$
819,823
$
249,315
$
292,089
Real estate depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations
248,235
251,104
230,638
Adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures
9,194
9,146
5,337
Gain on sale of unconsolidated joint venture properties
(1)
—
—
(3,566
)
Gain on sale of operating properties, net of tax
(294,954
)
(104,015
)
(155,680
)
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
(375,237
)
—
—
Income allocated to non-controlling interests
18,403
8,947
9,225
Funds from operations
$
425,464
$
414,497
$
378,043
Less: recurring capitalized expenditures
(59,084
)
(64,169
)
(59,854
)
Adjusted funds from operations
$
366,380
$
350,328
$
318,189
Weighted average shares – basic
89,580
89,120
88,084
Incremental shares issuable from assumed conversion of:
Common share options and awards granted
323
370
384
Common units
1,891
1,896
1,898
Weighted average shares – diluted
91,794
91,386
90,366
(1) The gain in 2014 represents our proportionate share of the gain on sale of two operating properties sold by the Funds in 2014.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Financial Condition and Sources of Liquidity
We intend to maintain a strong balance sheet and preserve our financial flexibility, which we believe should enhance our ability to identify and capitalize on investment opportunities as they become available. We intend to maintain what management believes is a conservative capital structure by:
•
extending and sequencing the maturity dates of our debt where practicable;
•
managing interest rate exposure using what management believes to be prudent levels of fixed and floating rate debt;
•
maintaining what management believes to be conservative coverage ratios; and,
•
using what management believes to be a prudent combination of debt and equity.
Our interest expense coverage ratio, net of capitalized interest, was approximately
5.5
,
5.2
, and
5.0
times for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
, respectively. This ratio is a method for calculating the amount of operating cash flows available to cover interest expense and is calculated by dividing interest expense for the period into the sum of property revenues and expenses, non-property income, other expenses and income from discontinued operations after adding back depreciation, amortization, and interest expense from both continuing and discontinued operations. Approximately
78.3%
, 79.9%, and 79.5% of our properties were unencumbered at
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
, respectively. Our weighted average maturity of debt was approximately
4.9
years at
December 31, 2016
.
We also intend to strengthen our capital and liquidity positions by continuing to focus on our core fundamentals, which currently are generating positive cash flows from operations, maintaining appropriate debt levels and leverage ratios, and controlling overhead costs.
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents on hand, short-term investments, and cash flow generated from operations. Other sources may include one or more of the following: availability under our unsecured credit facility,
33
Table of Contents
proceeds from property dispositions, the use of debt and equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement, equity issued from our ATM program, and other unsecured borrowings and secured mortgages. We believe our liquidity and financial condition are sufficient to meet all of our reasonably anticipated cash needs during
2017
including:
•
normal recurring operating expenses;
•
current debt service requirements, including debt maturities;
•
recurring capital expenditures;
•
reposition expenditures;
•
funding of property developments, redevelopments, acquisitions, and joint venture investments; and,
•
the minimum dividend payments required to maintain our REIT qualification under the Code.
Factors which could increase or decrease our future liquidity include but are not limited to volatility in capital and credit markets, and interest rates, changes in sources of financing, the satisfaction of REIT dividend requirements, our ability to complete asset purchases, sales, or developments, the effect our debt level and changes in credit ratings could have on our cost of funds, and our ability to access capital markets.
Cash Flows
The following is a discussion of our cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
.
Net cash from operating activities was approximately
$443.1 million
during the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to approximately
$423.2 million
during the year ended
December 31, 2015
. The increase was primarily due to higher net property-level NOI, primarily due to the growth in revenues attributable to increased rental rates from our same store communities and growth in the number of non-same store properties resulting from the stabilization of nine operating properties in 2015 and 2016, the completion and partial lease-up of two operating properties in 2016, and the partial lease-up of two properties under construction at December 31, 2016. The increase was also due to an approximate $10.0 million bonus paid to employees in 2015 relating to the restructuring of the Funds in December 2014. The increase was partially offset by a decrease related to the disposition of 15 operating properties, a retail center, and approximately 19.6 acres of land classified as discontinued operations in 2016, as well as the disposition of three other operating properties, in 2015 and the disposition of one dual-phased operating property and six other operating properties in 2016. See further discussions of our 2016 operations as compared to 2015 in "Results of Operations."
Net cash from investing activities during the year ended
December 31, 2016
totaled approximately
$690.4 million
as compared to net cash used in investing activities of approximately
$293.2 million
during the year ended
December 31, 2015
. During 2016, we received approximately
$623.0 million
, net of expenses, from the sale of 15 operating properties, a retail center, and approximately 19.6 acres of land classified as discontinued operations, as well as approximately
$515.8 million
, net of expenses, from the sale of one dual-phased operating property and six other properties and one land holding. These cash inflows were partially offset by cash outflows for property development and capital improvements of approximately
$343.0 million
during
2016
as compared to approximately
$411.8 million
in
2015
, primarily due to the completion of nine operating properties in 2015 and 2016, and the completion of repositions at several of our operating properties. The expenditures related to property development and capital improvements during the years ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
included the following:
December 31,
(in millions)
2016
2015
Expenditures for new development, including land
$
220.4
$
285.8
Capitalized interest, real estate taxes, and other capitalized indirect costs
29.8
30.9
Reposition expenditures
23.1
31.2
Capital expenditures
69.7
63.9
Total
$
343.0
$
411.8
During the year ended
December 31, 2016
, cash outflows also included the purchase of a short-term investment for
$100 million
. During the year ended
December 31, 2015
, cash outflows also included
$13.8 million
relating to capital improvements and reposition expenditures from our discontinued operations. These cash outflows were offset by proceeds of approximately
$145.0 million
from the sale of three operating properties and two land holdings.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled approximately
$904.2 million
during the year ended
December 31, 2016
as compared to approximately
$273.2 million
during the year ended
December 31, 2015
. During 2016, we had net payments of
34
Table of Contents
$244.0 million
on our unsecured credit facility and other short-term borrowings. We also used approximately
$663.4 million
to pay distributions to common shareholders and non-controlling interest holders which included the $4.25 per common share special dividend payment made on September 30, 2016. During
2015
, we used
$250.0 million
to repay maturing unsecured notes payable and approximately
$3.0 million
to pay principal amortization payments. We also used approximately
$253.1 million
to pay distributions to common shareholders and non-controlling interest holders, and approximately
$9.5 million
to acquire the remaining non-controlling interests in two consolidated joint ventures. The cash flows for 2015 were partially offset by net proceeds from our unsecured line of credit and other short-term borrowings of
$244.0 million
.
The following is a discussion of our cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2015
and
2014
.
Net cash from operating activities was approximately
$423.2 million
during the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to approximately
$418.5 million
during the year ended
December 31, 2014
. The increase was primarily due to higher net property-level net operating income, primarily due to the growth in revenues directly attributable to increased rental rates from our same store communities and growth in non-same store properties primarily relating to the acquisition of one operating property in 2014, the stabilization of one operating property in 2014 and five operating properties in 2015, the completion and partial lease-up of three operating properties during the third and fourth quarters of 2015, and the partial lease-up of one property under construction at December 31, 2015. These increases in net cash from operating activities were partially offset by the disposition of five operating properties in 2014 and three operating properties in 2015. These decreases were also due to an approximate $10.0 million bonus paid to employees in 2015 relating to the restructuring of the Funds in December 2014, as well as the timing of the first interest payment relating to the $250 million,
3.68%
unsecured notes issued in September 2014, which was made in the first quarter of 2015. See further discussions of our 2015 operations as compared to 2014 in "Results of Operations."
Net cash used in investing activities during the year ended
December 31, 2015
totaled approximately
$293.2 million
as compared to approximately
$326.6 million
during the year ended
December 31, 2014
. Cash outflows for property development and capital improvements from continuing operations were approximately
$411.8 million
during
2015
as compared to approximately
$497.1 million
during
2014
, primarily due to the completion of nine operating properties in 2014 and 2015, and the completion of repositions at several of our operating properties. The expenditures related to property development and capital improvements during the years ended
December 31, 2015
and
2014
included the following:
December 31,
(in millions)
2015
2014
Expenditures for new development, including land
$
285.8
$
342.1
Capitalized interest, real estate taxes, and other capitalized indirect costs
30.9
34.1
Reposition expenditures
31.2
64.4
Capital expenditures
63.9
56.5
Total
$
411.8
$
497.1
During the year ended
December 31, 2015
, cash outflows also included approximately
$13.8 million
relating to capital improvements and reposition expenditures from our discontinued operations. These cash outflows were offset by proceeds, net of expenses, of approximately
$145.0 million
from the sale of three operating properties and two land holdings. Additional cash outflows for the year ended
December 31, 2014
related to the acquisition of one operating property for approximately
$62.3 million
and capital improvements from our discontinued operations of approximately
$6.2 million
. Net cash used in investing activities during the year ended
December 31, 2014
was partially offset by cash inflows of approximately
$237.6 million
, net of expenses, from the sale of five operating properties and four land holdings in
2014
, and the distributions received from our joint ventures of approximately
$6.4 million
relating to the sale of two operating properties in February 2014.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled approximately
$273.2 million
during the year ended
December 31, 2015
as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of
$43.5 million
during the year ended
December 31, 2014
. During 2015, we used
$250.0 million
to repay maturing unsecured notes payable and approximately
$3.0 million
to pay principal amortization payments. We also used approximately
$253.1 million
to pay distributions to common shareholders and non-controlling interest holders, and approximately
$9.5 million
to acquire the remaining non-controlling interests in two fully consolidated joint ventures. The cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2015
were partially offset by net proceeds from our unsecured line of credit and other short-term borrowings of approximately
$244.0 million
. During
2014
, we received net proceeds of approximately
$248.1 million
from the issuance in September 2014 of $250.0 million unsecured notes payable and net proceeds of approximately
$66.2 million
from the issuance of approximately 0.9 million common shares from our ATM program. The cash inflows during
2014
were partially offset by approximately
$236.5 million
used for distributions paid to common shareholders and non-controlling interest holders, approximately
$32.3 million
used to repay maturing secured mortgage notes payable, and approximately
$4.0 million
used for principal amortization payments.
35
Table of Contents
Financial Flexibility
We have a
$600.0 million
unsecured credit facility which matures in August 2019, with two six-month options to extend the maturity date at our election to August 2020. Additionally, we have the option to further increase our credit facility to
$900.0 million
by either adding additional banks to the facility or obtaining the agreement of the existing banks to increase their commitments. The interest rate on this credit facility is based upon the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus a margin which is subject to change as our credit ratings change. Advances under this credit facility may be priced at the scheduled rates, or we may enter into bid rate loans with participating banks at rates below the scheduled rates. These bid rate loans have terms of
180
days or less and may not exceed the lesser of
$300.0 million
or the remaining amount available under the credit facility. Our credit facility is subject to customary financial covenants and limitations. We believe we are in compliance with all such financial covenants and limitations on the date of this filing.
Our credit facility provides us with the ability to issue up to
$50.0 million
in letters of credit. While our issuance of letters of credit does not increase our borrowings outstanding under our credit facility, it does reduce the amount available. At
December 31, 2016
, we had no balances outstanding on our
$600.0 million
credit facility and we had outstanding letters of credit totaling approximately
$12.7 million
, leaving approximately
$587.3 million
available under our credit facility.
We currently have an automatic shelf registration statement which allows us to offer, from time to time, common shares, preferred shares, debt securities, or warrants. Our Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust provides we may issue up to 185 million shares of beneficial interest, consisting of 175 million common shares and 10 million preferred shares. At
December 31, 2016
we had approximately
87.5 million
common shares outstanding, net of treasury shares and shares held in our deferred compensation arrangements, and no preferred shares outstanding.
In November 2014, we created an at-the-market share offering program (the "ATM program") through which we can, but have no obligation to, sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to
$
331.3 million
in amounts and at times as we determine, into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions. Actual sales from time to time may depend on a variety of factors including, among others, market conditions, the trading price of our common shares, and determinations by management of the appropriate sources of funding for us. We intend to use the net proceeds from any future sales under the ATM program for general corporate purposes, which may include reducing future borrowings under our unsecured credit facility, the repayment of other indebtedness, the redemption or other repurchase of outstanding debt or equity securities, funding for development, redevelopment and investment projects and financing for acquisitions.
As of the date of this filing, we had common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to
$315.3 million
remaining available for sale under the ATM program.
We believe our ability to access capital markets is enhanced by our senior unsecured debt ratings by Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard and Poor's, which are currently
A3 with stable outlook, A- with stable outlook, and BBB+ with stable outlook, respectively
. We believe our ability to access capital markets is also enhanced by our ability to borrow on a secured basis from various institutions including banks, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or life insurance companies. However, we may not be able to maintain our current credit ratings and may not be able to borrow on a secured or unsecured basis in the future.
Future Cash Requirements and Contractual Obligations
One of our principal long-term liquidity requirements includes the repayment of maturing debt, including any future borrowings under our unsecured credit facility. We believe payments of debt in
2017
are manageable at approximately
$276.0 million
which represents approximately 11.1% of our total outstanding debt, and includes scheduled principal amortization of approximately $1.2 million.
See Note 9, “Notes Payable,” in the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of scheduled maturities.
We estimate the additional cost to complete the construction of the
seven
consolidated projects to be approximately
$240.6 million
. Of this amount, we expect to incur costs between approximately
$150 million
and
$170 million
during
2017
and to incur the remaining costs during
2018
and
2019
. Additionally, we expect to incur costs between approximately
$20 million
and
$30 million
related to the start of new development activities, between approximately
$24 million
and
$28 million
of additional redevelopment expenditures and between approximately
$60 million
and
$64 million
of additional recurring capital expenditures during
2017
.
We anticipate meeting our near-term liquidity requirements
through a combination of one or more of the following: cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash flows generated from operations, draws on our unsecured credit facility, proceeds from property dispositions, the use of debt and equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement, equity issued from our ATM program, other unsecured borrowings, and secured mortgages.
We continue to evaluate our operating properties and land development portfolio and plan to continue our practice of selective dispositions as market conditions warrant and opportunities arise.
36
Table of Contents
As a REIT, we are subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute current dividends to our shareholders equal to a minimum of 90% of our annual taxable income. In order to minimize paying income taxes, our general policy is to distribute at least 100% of our taxable income. In September 2016, our Board of Trust Managers also declared a special dividend of $4.25 per common share to our common shareholders of record as of September 23, 2016, which was paid on September 30, 2016. The special dividend consisted of gains on dispositions of assets completed in 2016 and enabled us to distribute 100% of our taxable income; we also paid equivalent amounts per unit to holders of the common operating partnership units. In December 2016, we announced our Board of Trust Managers had declared a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per common share to our common shareholders of record as of December 16, 2016. This dividend was subsequently paid on January 17, 2017 and we paid equivalent amounts per unit to holders of common operating partnership units. Excluding the special dividend and aggregated with previous
2016
dividends, this distribution to common shareholders and holders of the common operating partnership units equates to an annual dividend rate of $3.00 per share or unit for the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
In the first quarter of 2017, the Company's Board of Trust Managers maintained the $0.75 quarterly dividend rate per common share. Future dividend payments are paid at the discretion of the Board of Trust Managers and depend on cash flows generated from operations, the Company's financial condition and capital requirements, distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and other factors which may be deemed relevant by our Board of Trust Managers. Assuming similar dividend distributions for the remainder of 2017, our annualized dividend rate for 2017 would be $3.00.
The following table summarizes our known contractual cash obligations as of
December 31, 2016
:
(in millions)
Total
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Debt maturities
(1)(2)
$
2,480.6
$
276.0
$
173.8
$
643.2
$
(1.1
)
$
249.1
$
1,139.6
Interest payments
(2)(3)
454.1
98.3
89.1
63.2
55.4
49.1
99.0
Non-cancelable lease payments
21.7
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.5
2.5
8.6
Unfunded commitments under notes
receivable
0.8
0.8
—
—
—
—
—
$
2,957.2
$
378.0
$
265.6
$
708.9
$
56.8
$
300.7
$
1,247.2
(1)
Includes scheduled principal payments and amortization of debt discounts and debt issuance costs.
(2)
Subsequent to December 31, 2016, we gave notice of advance repayment on our tax-exempt secured note payable of approximately $30.7 million in February 2017, which was initially due to mature in 2028. This table reflects this repayment in 2017.
(3)
Includes contractual interest payments for our senior unsecured notes and secured notes. The interest payments on certain secured notes with floating interest rates were calculated based on the interest rates in effect as of
December 31, 2016
.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The joint ventures in which we have an interest have been funded in part with secured, third-party debt. At
December 31, 2016
, our unconsolidated joint ventures had outstanding debt of approximately
$518.7 million
, of which our proportionate share was approximately
$162.4 million
. As of
December 31, 2016
, we had no outstanding guarantees related to the loans of our unconsolidated joint ventures.
Inflation
Substantially all of our apartment leases are for a term generally ranging from
six
to
eighteen
months. In an inflationary environment, we may realize increased rents at the commencement of new leases or upon the renewal of existing leases. We believe the short-term nature of our leases generally minimizes our risk from the adverse effects of inflation.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date, and the amounts of revenues and expenses recognized during the reporting period. These estimates are based on historical experience and other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The following is a discussion of our critical accounting policies. For a discussion of all of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Principles of Consolidation
. We may enter into various joint venture agreements with unrelated third parties to hold or develop real estate assets. We must determine for each of these joint ventures whether to consolidate the entity or account for our investment under the equity or cost basis of accounting. Investments acquired or created are evaluated based on the
37
Table of Contents
accounting guidance relating to variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which requires the consolidation of VIEs in which we are considered to be the primary beneficiary. If the investment is determined not to be a VIE, then the investment is evaluated for consolidation primarily using a voting interest model. In determining if we have a controlling financial interest, we consider factors such as ownership interests, authority to make decisions, kick-out rights and participating rights. We evaluate our accounting for investments on a quarterly basis or when a reconsideration event (as defined by GAAP) with respect to our investments occurs. The analysis required to identify VIEs and primary beneficiaries is complex and requires substantial management judgment.
Asset Impairment
. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment may exist if estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with long-lived assets are not sufficient to recover the carrying value of such assets. We consider projected future undiscounted cash flows, trends, strategic decisions regarding future development plans, and other factors in our assessment of whether impairment conditions exist. While we believe our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding a number of factors, including market rents, economic conditions, and occupancies, could significantly affect these estimates. In estimating fair value, management uses appraisals, management estimates, and discounted cash flow calculations which utilize inputs from a marketplace participant’s perspective. When impairment exists, the long-lived asset is adjusted to its fair value. In addition, we evaluate our equity investments in joint ventures and if we believe there is an other than temporary decline in market value of our investment below our carrying value, we will record an impairment charge.
The value of our properties under development depends on market conditions, including estimates of the project start date as well as estimates of demand for multifamily communities. We have reviewed market trends and other marketplace information and have incorporated this information as well as our current outlook into the assumptions we use in our impairment analyses. Due to the judgment and assumptions applied in the impairment analyses, it is possible actual results could differ substantially from those estimated.
We believe the carrying value of our operating real estate assets, properties under development, and land is currently recoverable. However, if market conditions deteriorate or if changes in our development strategy significantly affect any key assumptions used in our fair value estimates, we may need to take material charges in future periods for impairments related to existing assets. Any such material non-cash charges could have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Cost Capitalization
. Real estate assets are carried at cost plus capitalized carrying charges. Carrying charges are primarily interest and real estate taxes which are capitalized as part of properties under development. Capitalized interest is generally based on the weighted average interest rate of our unsecured debt. Expenditures directly related to the development and improvement of real estate assets are capitalized at cost as land and buildings and improvements. Indirect development costs, including salaries and benefits and other related costs directly attributable to the development of properties, are also capitalized. We begin capitalizing development, construction, and carrying costs when the development of the future real estate asset is probable and activities necessary to prepare the underlying real estate for its intended use have been initiated. All construction and carrying costs are capitalized and reported in the balance sheet as properties under development until the apartment homes are substantially completed. Upon substantial completion of the apartment homes, the total capitalized development cost for the apartment homes and the associated land is transferred to buildings and improvements and land, respectively. Included in capitalized costs are indirect costs associated with our development and redevelopment activities. The estimates used by management require judgment, and accordingly we believe cost capitalization to be a critical accounting estimate.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements" in the notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of recent accounting pronouncements issued during the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to certain market risks inherent in our operations. These risks generally arise from transactions entered into in the normal course of business. We believe our primary market risk exposure relates to interest rate risk. Derivatives are not entered into for speculative purposes.
38
Table of Contents
The table below provides information about our liabilities sensitive to changes in interest rates as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
.
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
Amount
(in millions)
Weighted
Average
Maturity
(in years)
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
% Of
Total
Amount
(in millions)
Weighted
Average
Maturity
(in years)
Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
% Of
Total
Fixed rate debt
$
2,274.9
5.0
4.7
%
91.7
%
$
2,273.3
6.0
4.7
%
83.4
%
Variable rate debt
205.7
3.2
1.4
8.3
451.4
3.8
1.2
%
16.6
%
We have historically used variable rate indebtedness available under our unsecured credit facility and other short-term borrowings to initially fund acquisitions and our development pipeline. To the extent we utilize our unsecured credit facility and increase our variable rate indebtedness, our exposure to increases in interest rates will also increase.
For fixed rate debt, interest rate changes affect the fair market value but do not impact net income attributable to common shareholders or cash flows. Conversely, for floating rate debt, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market value but do impact net income attributable to common shareholders and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. Holding other variables constant, a one percentage point variance in interest rates would change the unrealized fair market value of the fixed rate debt by approximately $99.2 million. The net income attributable to common shareholders and cash flows impact on the next year resulting from a one percentage point variance in interest rates on floating rate debt would be approximately $2.1 million, holding all other variables constant.
39
Table of Contents
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Our response to this item is included in a separate section at the end of this report beginning on page F-1.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Securities Exchange Act ("Exchange Act") Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based on the evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report are effective to ensure information required to be disclosed by us in our Exchange Act filings is accurately recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
40
Table of Contents
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as follows:
A process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company's board of trust managers, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
•
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
•
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and Board of Trust Managers of the Company; and
•
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2016
. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on our assessment, management concluded our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of
December 31, 2016
.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.
February 13, 2017
41
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Trust Managers and Shareholders of
Camden Property Trust
Houston, Texas
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Camden Property Trust and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of
December 31, 2016
, based on criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of trust managers, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the board of trust managers of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2016
, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2016
of the Company and our report dated
February 13, 2017
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedules.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
February 13, 2017
42
Table of Contents
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
Information with respect to this Item 10 is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement, which we expect to file on or about
March 24, 2017
in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on or about
May 12, 2017
.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information with respect to this Item 11 is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement, which we expect to file on or about
March 24, 2017
in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on or about
May 12, 2017
.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters
Information with respect to this Item 12 is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement, which we expect to file on or about
March 24, 2017
in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on or about
May 12, 2017
to the extent not set forth below.
The following table gives information about the equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2016
.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan Category
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
105,066
$
48.27
1,057,960
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
—
—
—
Total
105,066
$
48.27
1,057,960
Incentive Compensation.
During the second quarter of 2011, our Board of Trust Managers adopted, and our shareholders approved, the 2011 Share Incentive Plan of Camden Property Trust (as amended, the “2011 Share Plan”). Under the 2011 Share Plan, we may issue up to a total of approximately 9.1 million fungible units (the “Fungible Pool Limit”), which is comprised of approximately 5.8 million new fungible units plus approximately 3.3 million fungible units previously available for issuance under our 2002 share incentive plan based on a 3.45 to 1.0 fungible unit to full value award conversion ratio. Fungible units represent the baseline for the number of shares available for issuance under the 2011 Share Plan. Different types of awards are counted differently against the Fungible Pool Limit, as follows:
•
Each share issued or to be issued in connection with an award, other than an option, right or other award which does not deliver the full value at grant of the underlying shares, will be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 3.45 fungible pool units;
•
Options and other awards which do not deliver the full value at grant of the underlying shares and which expire more than five years from date of grant will be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as one fungible pool unit; and
•
Options, rights and other awards which do not deliver the full value at grant and expire five years or less from the date of grant will be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as 0.83 of a fungible pool unit.
At
December 31, 2016
, approximately
3.6 million
fungible units were available under the 2011 Share Plan, which results in approximately
1.1 million
common shares which may be granted pursuant to full value awards based on the 3.45 to 1.0 fungible unit to full value award conversion ratio.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information with respect to this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, which we expect to file on or about
March 24, 2017
in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on or about
May 12, 2017
.
43
Table of Contents
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Information with respect to this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, which we expect to file on or about
March 24, 2017
in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on or about
May 12, 2017
.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1) Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015
F-2
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014
F-3
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014
F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-9
(2) Financial Statement Schedules:
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
S-1
Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
S-3
All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is presented in the financial statements and the related notes or is not applicable.
(3) Index to Exhibits:
The following exhibits are filed as part of or incorporated by reference into this report:
Exhibit No.
Description
Filed Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference (1)
3.1
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Camden Property Trust
Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993
3.2
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Camden Property Trust
Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997
3.3
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Camden Property Trust
Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2012
3.4
Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of Camden Property Trust
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on March 11, 2013
4.1
Specimen certificate for Common Shares of Beneficial Interest
Form S-11 filed on September 15, 1993 (Registration No. 33-68736)
4.2
Indenture for Senior Debt Securities dated as of February 11, 2003 between Camden Property Trust and U. S. Bank National Association, as successor to SunTrust Bank, as Trustee
Exhibit 4.1 to Form S-3 filed on February 12, 2003 (Registration No. 333-103119)
4.3
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of May 4, 2007 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor to SunTrust Bank, as Trustee
Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2007
44
Table of Contents
Exhibit No.
Description
Filed Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference (1)
4.4
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 3, 2011 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as successor to SunTrust Bank, as Trustee
Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2011
4.5
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 28, 2005 between Camden Property Trust and the holders named therein
Form S-4 filed on November 24, 2004 (Registration No. 333-120733)
4.6
Form of Camden Property Trust 5.700% Note due 2017
Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on May 7, 2007
4.7
Form of Camden Property Trust 4.625% Note due 2021
Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2011
4.8
Form of Camden Property Trust 2.95% Note due 2022
Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2012
4.9
Form of Camden Property Trust 4.875% Note due 2023
Exhibit 4.5 to Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2011
4.10
Form of Camden Property Trust 4.250% Notes due 2024
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 2, 2013
4.11
Form of Camden Property Trust 3.50% Notes due 2024
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on September 12, 2014
10.1
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Camden Property Trust and certain of its trust managers and executive officers
Form S-11 filed on July 9, 1993 (Registration No. 33-63588)
10.2
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated July 11, 2003 between Camden Property Trust and Richard J. Campo
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
10.3
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated July 11, 2003 between Camden Property Trust and D. Keith Oden
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
10.4
Form of First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreements, effective as of January 1, 2008, between Camden Property Trust and each of Richard J. Campo and D. Keith Oden
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007
10.5
Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2008, between Camden Property Trust and D. Keith Oden
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on March 18, 2008
10.6
Form of Employment Agreement by and between Camden Property Trust and certain senior executive officers
Exhibit 10.13 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996
10.7
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated November 3, 2008, between Camden Property Trust and H. Malcolm Stewart
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2008
10.8
Second Amended and Restated Camden Property Trust Key Employee Share Option Plan (KEYSOP
™
), effective as of January 1, 2008
Exhibit 99.5 to Form 8-K filed on November 30, 2007
10.9
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Camden Property Trust Key Employee Share Option Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2008
10.10
Form of Amended and Restated Master Exchange Agreement between Camden Property Trust and certain key employees
Exhibit 10.7 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
10.11
Form of Amended and Restated Master Exchange Agreement between Camden Property Trust and certain trust managers
Exhibit 10.8 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
45
Table of Contents
Exhibit No.
Description
Filed Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference (1)
10.12
Form of Amended and Restated Master Exchange Agreement between Camden Property Trust and certain key employees
Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
10.13
Form of Master Exchange Agreement between Camden Property Trust and certain trust managers
Exhibit 10.10 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
10.14
Form of Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Master Exchange Agreement (Trust Managers) effective November 27, 2007
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q filed on July 30, 2010
10.15
Form of Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Master Exchange Agreement (Key Employees) effective November 27, 2007
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q filed on July 30, 2010
10.16
Form of Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Camden Operating, L.P.
Exhibit 10.1 to Form S-4 filed on February 26, 1997 (Registration No. 333-22411)
10.17
First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Camden Operating, L.P., dated as of February 23, 1999
Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K filed on March 10, 1999
10.18
Form of Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Camden Operating, L.P., dated as of August 13, 1999
Exhibit 10.15 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999
10.19
Form of Third Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Camden Operating, L.P., dated as of September 7, 1999
Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999
10.20
Form of Fourth Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Camden Operating, L.P., dated as of January 7, 2000
Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999
10.21
Form of Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Camden Operating, L.P., dated as of December 1, 2003
Exhibit 10.19 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
10.22
Amended and Restated 1993 Share Incentive Plan of Camden Property Trust
Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999
10.23
Amended and Restated Camden Property Trust 1999 Employee Share Purchase Plan
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2014
10.24
Amended and Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan of Camden Property Trust
Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002
10.25
Amendment to Amended and Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan of Camden Property Trust
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 4, 2006
10.26
Amendment to Amended and Restated 2002 Share Incentive Plan of Camden Property Trust, effective as of January 1, 2008
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2008
10.27
Camden Property Trust 2011 Share Incentive Plan, effective as of May 11, 2011
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on May 12, 2011
10.28
Amendment No. 1 to 2011 Share Incentive Plan of Camden Property Trust, dated as of July 31, 2012
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2012
10.29
Amendment No. 2 to the 2011 Share Incentive Plan of Camden Property Trust, dated as of July 30, 2013
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2013
10.30
Amendment No. 3 to the 2011 Share Incentive Plan of Camden Property Trust, dated as of October 28, 2015
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on October 29, 2015
46
Table of Contents
Exhibit No.
Description
Filed Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference (1)
10.31
Camden Property Trust Short Term Incentive Plan
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002
10.32
Second Amended and Restated Camden Property Trust Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on February 21, 2014
10.33
Form of Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Camden Summit Partnership, L.P. among Camden Summit, Inc., as general partner, and the persons whose names are set forth on Exhibit A thereto
Exhibit 10.4 to Form S-4 filed on November 24, 2004 (Registration No. 333-120733)
10.34
Form of Tax, Asset and Income Support Agreement among Camden Property Trust, Camden Summit, Inc., Camden Summit Partnership, L.P. and each of the limited partners who has executed a signature page thereto
Exhibit 10.5 to Form S-4 filed on November 24, 2004 (Registration No. 333-120733)
10.35
Employment Agreement dated February 15, 1999, by and among William B. McGuire, Jr., Summit Properties Inc. and Summit Management Company, as restated on August 24, 2001
Exhibit 10.1 to Summit Properties Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 (File No. 000-12792)
10.36
Amendment Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2004, among William B. McGuire, Jr., Summit Properties Inc. and Summit Management Company
Exhibit 10.8.2 to Summit Properties Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (File No. 001-12792)
10.37
Employment Agreement dated February 15, 1999, by and among William F. Paulsen, Summit Properties Inc. and Summit Management Company, as restated on April 3, 2001
Exhibit 10.1 to Summit Properties Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001 (File No. 000-12792)
10.38
Amendment Agreement, dated as of June 19, 2004, among William F. Paulsen, Summit Properties Inc. and Summit Management Company
Exhibit 10.8.2 to Summit Properties Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (File No. 001-12792)
10.39
Separation Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2005, between Camden Property Trust and William B. McGuire, Jr.
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2005
10.40
Separation Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2005, between Camden Property Trust and William F. Paulsen
Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2005
10.41
Master Credit Agreement, dated as of September 24, 2008, among CSP Community Owner, LLC, CPT Community Owner, LLC, and Red Mortgage Capital, Inc. (2)
Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q filed on July 30, 2010
10.42
Form of Master Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of April 17, 2009, among Summit Russett, LLC, 2009 CPT Community Owner, LLC, 2009 CUSA Community Owner, LLC, 2009 CSP Community Owner LLC, and 2009 COLP Community Owner, LLC, as borrowers, Camden Property Trust, as guarantor, and Red Mortgage Capital, Inc., as lender (2)
Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q filed on July 30, 2010
10.43
Distribution Agency Agreement, dated November 3, 2014, between Camden Property Trust and Jefferies LLC
Exhibit 1.1 to Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2014
10.44
Distribution Agency Agreement, dated November 3, 2014, between Camden Property Trust and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
Exhibit 1.2 to Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2014
47
Table of Contents
Exhibit No.
Description
Filed Herewith or Incorporated Herein by Reference (1)
10.45
Distribution Agency Agreement, dated November 3, 2014, between Camden Property Trust and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Exhibit 1.3 to Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2014
10.46
Distribution Agency Agreement, dated November 3, 2014, between Camden Property Trust and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.
Exhibit 1.4 to Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2014
10.47
Distribution Agency Agreement, dated November 3, 2014, between Camden Property Trust and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Exhibit 1.5 to Form 8-K filed on November 5, 2014
10.48
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of August 7, 2015 among Camden Property Trust, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., PNC Bank National Association, Regions Bank, SunTrust Bank, The Bank of Nova Scotia, U.S. Bank National Association, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Documentation Agents, Branch Banking and Trust Company, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, LTD., as Managing Agents, and the other lenders party thereto, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 11, 2015
12.1
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratios
Filed Herewith
21.1
List of Significant Subsidiaries
Filed Herewith
23.1
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
Filed Herewith
24.1
Powers of Attorney for Heather J. Brunner, Scott S. Ingraham, Renu Khator, Lewis A. Levey, William B. McGuire, Jr., F. Gardner Parker, William F. Paulsen, Frances Aldrich Sevilla-Sacasa, Steven A. Webster, and Kelvin R. Westbrook
Filed Herewith
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
Filed Herewith
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
Filed Herewith
32.1
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Filed Herewith
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
Filed Herewith
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Filed Herewith
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Filed Herewith
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
Filed Herewith
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
Filed Herewith
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
Filed Herewith
(1)
Unless otherwise indicated, all references to reports or registration statements are to reports or registration statements filed by Camden Property Trust (File No. 1-12110).
(2)
Portions of the exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.
48
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Camden Property Trust has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
February 13, 2017
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
By:
/s/ Michael P. Gallagher
Michael P. Gallagher
Senior Vice President — Chief Accounting Officer
49
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Camden Property Trust and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name
Title
Date
/s/ Richard J. Campo
Chairman of the Board of Trust
February 13, 2017
Richard J. Campo
Managers and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ D. Keith Oden
President and Trust Manager
February 13, 2017
D. Keith Oden
/s/ Alexander J. Jessett
Executive Vice President - Finance,
February 13, 2017
Alexander J. Jessett
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal
Financial Officer)
/s/ Michael P. Gallagher
Senior Vice President - Chief Accounting
February 13, 2017
Michael P. Gallagher
Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer)
*
Heather J. Brunner
Trust Manager
February 13, 2017
*
Scott S. Ingraham
Trust Manager
February 13, 2017
*
Renu Khator
Trust Manager
February 13, 2017
*
Lewis A. Levey
Trust Manager
February 13, 2017
*
William B. McGuire, Jr.
Trust Manager
February 13, 2017
*
F. Gardner Parker
Trust Manager
February 13, 2017
*
William F. Paulsen
Trust Manager
February 13, 2017
*
Frances Aldrich Sevilla-Sacasa
Trust Manager
February 13, 2017
*
Steven A. Webster
Trust Manager
February 13, 2017
*
Kelvin R. Westbrook
Trust Manager
February 13, 2017
*By: /s/ Alexander J. Jessett
Alexander J. Jessett
Attorney-in-fact
50
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Trust Managers and Shareholders of
Camden Property Trust
Houston, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Camden Property Trust and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2016
. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Camden Property Trust and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2016
, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2016
, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated
February 13, 2017
expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
February 13, 2017
F-1
Table of Contents
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
2016
2015
Assets
Real estate assets, at cost
Land
$
967,375
$
989,247
Buildings and improvements
5,967,023
5,911,432
$
6,934,398
$
6,900,679
Accumulated depreciation
(1,890,656
)
(1,780,694
)
Net operating real estate assets
$
5,043,742
$
5,119,985
Properties under development, including land
442,292
486,918
Investments in joint ventures
30,254
33,698
Discontinued operations held for sale, including land
—
239,063
Total real estate assets
$
5,516,288
$
5,879,664
Accounts receivable – affiliates
24,028
25,100
Other assets, net
142,010
116,260
Short-term investments
100,000
—
Cash and cash equivalents
237,364
10,617
Restricted cash
8,462
5,971
Total assets
$
6,028,152
$
6,037,612
Liabilities and equity
Liabilities
Notes payable
Unsecured
$
1,583,236
$
1,824,930
Secured
897,352
899,757
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
137,813
133,353
Accrued real estate taxes
49,041
45,223
Distributions payable
69,161
64,275
Other liabilities
118,959
97,814
Total liabilities
$
2,855,562
$
3,065,352
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Non-qualified deferred compensation share awards
77,037
79,364
Equity
Common shares of beneficial interest; $0.01 par value per share; 175,000 shares authorized; 100,694 and 100,636 issued; 97,818 and 97,571 outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively
978
976
Additional paid-in capital
3,678,277
3,662,864
Distributions in excess of net income attributable to common shareholders
(289,180
)
(458,577
)
Treasury shares, at cost (10,330 and 10,703 common shares, at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively)
(373,339
)
(386,793
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(1,863
)
(1,913
)
Total common equity
$
3,014,873
$
2,816,557
Non-controlling interests
80,680
76,339
Total equity
$
3,095,553
$
2,892,896
Total liabilities and equity
$
6,028,152
$
6,037,612
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-2
Table of Contents
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
2016
2015
2014
Property revenues
Rental revenues
$
750,597
$
721,816
$
686,642
Other property revenues
125,850
113,802
103,621
Total property revenues
$
876,447
$
835,618
$
790,263
Property expenses
Property operating and maintenance
$
206,780
$
202,105
$
194,574
Real estate taxes
104,575
98,895
91,126
Total property expenses
$
311,355
$
301,000
$
285,700
Non-property income
Fee and asset management
$
6,864
$
6,999
$
9,832
Interest and other income
2,202
597
842
Income (loss) on deferred compensation plans
5,511
(264
)
3,937
Total non-property income
$
14,577
$
7,332
$
14,611
Other expenses
Property management
$
25,125
$
23,055
$
22,070
Fee and asset management
3,848
4,742
5,341
General and administrative
47,415
46,233
51,005
Interest
93,145
97,312
94,906
Depreciation and amortization
250,146
240,944
222,055
Expense (benefit) on deferred compensation plans
5,511
(264
)
3,937
Total other expenses
$
425,190
$
412,022
$
399,314
Gain on sale of operating properties, including land
295,397
104,288
159,289
Impairment associated with land holdings
—
—
(1,152
)
Equity in income of joint ventures
7,125
6,168
7,023
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
$
457,001
$
240,384
$
285,020
Income tax expense
(1,617
)
(1,872
)
(1,903
)
Income from continuing operations
$
455,384
$
238,512
$
283,117
Income from discontinued operations
7,605
19,750
18,197
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
375,237
—
—
Net income
$
838,226
$
258,262
$
301,314
Less income allocated to non-controlling interests from continuing operations
(18,403
)
(8,947
)
(9,225
)
Net income attributable to common shareholders
$
819,823
$
249,315
$
292,089
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
Table of Contents
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Continued)
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2016
2015
2014
Earnings per share – basic
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
$
4.81
$
2.55
$
3.08
Earnings per common share from discontinued operations
4.27
0.22
0.21
Total earnings per common share – basic
$
9.08
$
2.77
$
3.29
Earnings per share – diluted
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
$
4.79
$
2.54
$
3.06
Earnings per common share from discontinued operations
4.26
0.22
0.21
Total earnings per common share – diluted
$
9.05
$
2.76
$
3.27
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic
89,580
89,120
88,084
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – diluted
89,903
89,490
88,468
Net income attributable to common shareholders
Income from continuing operations
$
455,384
$
238,512
$
283,117
Less income allocated to non-controlling interests from continuing operations
(18,403
)
(8,947
)
(9,225
)
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders
$
436,981
$
229,565
$
273,892
Income from discontinued operations, including gain on sale
$
382,842
$
19,750
$
18,197
Net income attributable to common shareholders
$
819,823
$
249,315
$
292,089
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Net income
$
838,226
$
258,262
$
301,314
Other comprehensive income
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedging activities
—
—
(417
)
Unrealized gain (loss) and unamortized prior service cost on post retirement obligation
(80
)
357
(970
)
Reclassification of net loss on cash flow hedging activities, prior service cost and net loss on post retirement obligation
130
149
74
Comprehensive income
$
838,276
$
258,768
$
300,001
Less income allocated to non-controlling interests from continuing operations
(18,403
)
(8,947
)
(9,225
)
Comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders
$
819,873
$
249,821
$
290,776
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
Table of Contents
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Common Shareholders
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Common
shares of
beneficial
interest
Additional
paid-in capital
Distributions
in excess of
net income
Treasury
shares, at cost
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
Non-controlling
interests
Total
equity
Equity, December 31, 2013
$
967
$
3,596,069
$
(494,167
)
$
(410,227
)
$
(1,106
)
$
68,645
$
2,760,181
Net income
292,089
9,225
301,314
Other comprehensive loss
(1,313
)
(1,313
)
Common shares issued (898 shares)
9
66,216
66,225
Net share awards
8,010
11,358
19,368
Employee share purchase plan
1,012
1,259
2,271
Common share options exercised (55 shares)
1
517
984
1,502
Change in classification of deferred compensation plan
(7,702
)
(7,702
)
Change in redemption value of non-qualified share awards
(17,921
)
(17,921
)
Diversification of share awards within deferred compensation plan
3,273
1,396
4,669
Conversions of operating partnership units (1 share)
52
(52
)
—
Cash distributions declared to equity holders ($2.64 per share)
(235,174
)
(5,011
)
(240,185
)
Other
(1
)
1
—
Equity, December 31, 2014
$
976
$
3,667,448
$
(453,777
)
$
(396,626
)
$
(2,419
)
$
72,807
$
2,888,409
Net income
249,315
8,947
258,262
Other comprehensive income
506
506
Net share awards
13,020
9,305
22,325
Employee share purchase plan
583
528
1,111
Common share options exercised
176
176
Change in classification of deferred compensation plan
(10,999
)
(10,999
)
Change in redemption value of non-qualified share awards
(3,788
)
(3,788
)
Diversification of share awards within deferred compensation plan
2,134
1,423
3,557
Conversions of operating partnership units (2 shares)
86
(86
)
—
Cash distributions declared to equity holders ($2.80 per share)
(251,750
)
(5,309
)
(257,059
)
Purchase of non-controlling interests
(9,480
)
(20
)
(9,500
)
Other
(104
)
(104
)
Equity, December 31, 2015
$
976
$
3,662,864
$
(458,577
)
$
(386,793
)
$
(1,913
)
$
76,339
$
2,892,896
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
Table of Contents
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (Continued)
Common Shareholders
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Common
shares of
beneficial
interest
Additional
paid-in capital
Distributions
in excess of
net income
Treasury
shares, at cost
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
Non-controlling
interests
Total
equity
Equity, December 31, 2015
$
976
$
3,662,864
$
(458,577
)
$
(386,793
)
$
(1,913
)
$
76,339
$
2,892,896
Net income
819,823
18,403
838,226
Other comprehensive income
50
50
Net share awards
15,213
9,783
24,996
Employee share purchase plan
944
753
1,697
Common share options exercised (45 shares)
1,003
2,918
3,921
Change in classification of deferred compensation plan
(13,956
)
(13,956
)
Change in redemption value of non-qualified share awards
(9,145
)
(9,145
)
Diversification of share awards within deferred compensation plan
11,931
13,497
25,428
Conversions and redemptions of operating partnership units (8 shares)
290
(370
)
(80
)
Cash distributions declared to equity holders ($7.25 per share)
(654,778
)
(13,692
)
(668,470
)
Other
2
(12
)
(10
)
Equity, December 31, 2016
$
978
$
3,678,277
$
(289,180
)
$
(373,339
)
$
(1,863
)
$
80,680
$
3,095,553
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
Table of Contents
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
2016
2015
2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income
$
838,226
$
258,262
$
301,314
Net income from discontinued operations, including gain on sale
(382,842
)
(19,750
)
(18,197
)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
250,146
240,944
222,055
Gain on sale of operating properties, including land
(295,397
)
(104,288
)
(159,289
)
Impairment associated with land holdings
—
—
1,152
Distributions of income from joint ventures
7,057
6,387
7,399
Equity in income of joint ventures
(7,125
)
(6,168
)
(7,023
)
Share-based compensation
20,123
17,674
15,552
Net change in operating accounts and other
281
(5,761
)
22,298
Net cash from continuing operating activities
$
430,469
$
387,300
$
385,261
Net cash from discontinued operating activities
12,594
35,938
33,267
Net cash from operating activities
$
443,063
$
423,238
$
418,528
Cash flows from investing activities
Development and capital improvements
$
(342,952
)
$
(411,799
)
$
(497,124
)
Acquisition of operating properties
—
—
(62,260
)
Proceeds from sales of operating properties, including land
515,754
145,044
237,625
Purchase of short-term investments
(100,000
)
—
—
Distributions from investments in joint ventures
3,512
2,512
6,350
Other
(6,994
)
(15,217
)
(4,945
)
Net cash from continuing investing activities
$
69,320
$
(279,460
)
$
(320,354
)
Proceeds from discontinued operations
622,982
—
—
Net cash from discontinued investing activities
(1,890
)
(13,775
)
(6,233
)
Net cash from investing activities
$
690,412
$
(293,235
)
$
(326,587
)
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-7
Table of Contents
CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
2016
2015
2014
Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings on unsecured credit facility and other short-term borrowings
$
1,305,000
$
1,466,000
$
2,246,000
Repayments on unsecured credit facility and other short-term borrowings
(1,549,000
)
(1,222,000
)
(2,246,000
)
Proceeds from notes payable
—
—
248,078
Repayment of notes payable
(3,077
)
(253,043
)
(36,340
)
Distributions to common shareholders and non-controlling interests
(663,363
)
(253,129
)
(236,514
)
Purchase of non-controlling interests
—
(9,500
)
—
Proceeds from issuance of common shares
—
—
66,225
Other
6,203
(1,559
)
2,033
Net cash from financing activities
$
(904,237
)
$
(273,231
)
$
43,482
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
229,238
(143,228
)
135,423
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of year
16,588
159,816
24,393
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of year
$
245,826
$
16,588
$
159,816
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash to the Consolidated Balance Sheet
Cash and cash equivalents
$
237,364
$
10,617
$
153,918
Restricted cash
8,462
5,971
5,898
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of year
245,826
16,588
159,816
Supplemental information
Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized
$
93,302
$
96,179
$
86,711
Cash paid for income taxes
2,424
1,889
1,658
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities
Distributions declared but not paid
$
69,161
$
64,275
$
60,386
Value of shares issued under benefit plans, net of cancellations
19,006
18,336
19,310
Accrual associated with construction and capital expenditures
22,762
24,175
22,456
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-8
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Description of Business
Business.
Formed on May 25, 1993, Camden Property Trust, a Texas real estate investment trust (“REIT”), is primarily engaged in the ownership, management, development, redevelopment, acquisition, and construction of multifamily apartment communities. Our multifamily apartment communities are referred to as “communities,” “multifamily communities,” “properties,” or “multifamily properties” in the following discussion. As of
December 31, 2016
, we owned interests in, operated, or were developing
159
multifamily properties comprised of
55,366
apartment homes across the United States. Of the
159
properties,
seven
properties were under construction, and will consist of a total of
2,573
apartment homes when completed. We also own land holdings which we may develop into multifamily communities in the future.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Principles of Consolidation
. Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of other subsidiaries and joint ventures (including partnerships and limited liability companies) over which we have control. All intercompany transactions, balances, and profits have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments acquired or created are evaluated based on the accounting guidance relating to variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which requires the consolidation of VIEs in which we are considered to be the primary beneficiary. If the investment is determined not to be a VIE, then the investment is evaluated for consolidation primarily using a voting interest model. In determining if we have a controlling financial interest, we consider factors such as ownership interests, authority to make decisions, kick-out rights and participating rights. At
December 31, 2016
, two of our consolidated operating partnerships are VIEs, of which we held between
92%
and
94%
of the outstanding common limited partnership units and the sole
1%
general partnership interest of each consolidated operating partnership. As we are considered the primary beneficiary, we continue to consolidate these operating partnerships.
Acquisitions of Real Estate
. Upon acquisition of real estate, we determine the fair value of tangible and intangible assets, which includes land, buildings (as-if-vacant), furniture and fixtures, the value of in-place leases, including above and below market leases, and acquired liabilities. In estimating these values, we apply methods similar to those used by independent appraisers of income-producing property. Upon the acquisition of a controlling interest of an investment in an unconsolidated joint venture, such joint venture is consolidated and our initial equity investment is remeasured to fair value at the date the controlling interest is acquired; any difference between the carrying value of the previously held equity investment and the fair value is recognized in earnings at the time of obtaining control. Upon our adoption of Accounting Standard Update 2017-01 ("ASU 2017-01") on January 1, 2017, as discussed below in Recent Accounting Pronouncements, we believe most future transaction costs relating to acquisition of operating assets will be capitalized. Prior to our adoption of ASU 2017-01 transaction costs associated with the acquisition of operating assets were expensed as incurred. Estimates of fair value of acquired debt are based upon interest rates available for the issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the remaining useful lives of the related tangible assets. The value of in-place leases and above or below market leases is amortized over the estimated average remaining life of leases in place at the time of acquisition. The net carrying value of below market leases is included in other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets and the net carrying value of in-place leases is included in other assets, net in our consolidated balance sheets.
Revenues recognized related to below market leases and amortization expense related to in-place leases for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
are as follows:
December 31,
(in millions)
2016
2015
2014
Revenues related to below market leases
$
—
$
0.1
$
0.2
Amortization of in-place leases
$
—
$
0.5
$
1.4
The weighted average amortization period of below market leases and in-place leases was approximately
eight
months and
seven
months for the years ended and
December 31, 2015
and
2014
, respectively. There were no below market leases or in-place leases during the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
Asset Impairment
. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment may exist if estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with long-lived assets are not sufficient to recover the carrying value of such assets. We consider projected future undiscounted cash flows, trends, strategic decisions regarding future development plans, and other factors in our assessment of whether impairment conditions exist. While we believe our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding a number of factors, including market rents, economic conditions, and occupancies, could significantly affect these estimates. In estimating fair value, management uses appraisals, management estimates, and discounted cash flow calculations which utilize inputs from a marketplace participant’s perspective. When impairment exists,
F-9
Table of Contents
the long-lived asset is adjusted to its fair value. In addition, we evaluate our equity investments in joint ventures and if we believe there is an other than temporary decline in market value of our investment below our carrying value, we will record an impairment charge. We did not record any impairment charges for the years ended
December 31, 2016
or
2015
. See Note 7, "Acquisitions, Dispositions, Impairment, and Discontinued Operations," for discussion of impairment during the year ended
December 31, 2014
.
The value of our properties under development depends on market conditions, including estimates of the project start date as well as estimates of demand for multifamily communities. We have reviewed market trends and other marketplace information and have incorporated this information as well as our current outlook into the assumptions we use in our impairment analyses. Due to the judgment and assumptions applied in the impairment analyses, it is possible actual results could differ substantially from those estimated.
We believe the carrying value of our operating real estate assets, properties under development, and land is currently recoverable. However, if market conditions deteriorate or if changes in our development strategy significantly affect any key assumptions used in our fair value estimates, we may need to take material charges in future periods for impairments related to existing assets. Any such material non-cash charges could have an adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Short-term Investments.
At
December 31, 2016
, our short-term investments consists of certificates of deposit which have original maturities of more than three months but less than one year. The carrying value of our short-term investments approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these investments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
. All cash and investments in money market accounts and other highly liquid securities with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash and cash equivalents. We maintain the majority of our cash and cash equivalents at major financial institutions in the United States and deposits with these financial institutions may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits; however, we regularly monitor the financial stability of these financial institutions and believe we are not currently exposed to any significant default risk with respect to these deposits.
Cost Capitalization
. Real estate assets are carried at cost plus capitalized carrying charges. Carrying charges are primarily interest and real estate taxes which are capitalized as part of properties under development. Capitalized interest is generally based on the weighted average interest rate of our unsecured debt. Expenditures directly related to the development and improvement of real estate assets are capitalized at cost as land and buildings and improvements. Indirect development costs, including salaries and benefits and other related costs directly attributable to the development of properties, are also capitalized. We begin capitalizing development, construction, and carrying costs when the development of the future real estate asset is probable and activities necessary to prepare the underlying real estate for its intended use have been initiated. All construction and carrying costs are capitalized and reported in the balance sheet as properties under development until the apartment homes are substantially completed. As apartment homes within development properties are completed, the total capitalized development cost of each apartment home is transferred from properties under development including land to buildings and improvements.
As discussed above, carrying charges are principally interest and real estate taxes capitalized as part of properties under development. Capitalized interest was approximately
$18.2 million
,
$19.3 million
, and
$22.2 million
for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
, respectively. Capitalized real estate taxes were approximately
$4.5 million
,
$3.6 million
, and
$4.4 million
for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
, respectively.
Where possible, we stage our construction to allow leasing and occupancy during the construction period, which we believe minimizes the duration of the lease-up period following completion of construction. Our accounting policy related to properties in the development and leasing phase is to expense all operating expenses associated with completed apartment homes. We capitalize renovation and improvement costs we believe extend the economic lives of depreciable property. Capital expenditures subsequent to initial construction are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.
We also incur expenditures related to renovation and construction of office space we lease and we capitalize these leasehold improvements as furniture, fixtures, equipment and other. We depreciate these costs using the straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the useful life of the improvement.
Depreciation and amortization is computed over the expected useful lives of depreciable property on a straight-line basis with lives generally as follows:
F-10
Table of Contents
Estimated
Useful Life
Buildings and improvements
5-35 years
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and other
3-20 years
Intangible assets/liabilities (in-place leases and below market leases)
underlying lease term
Discontinued Operations
. A property is classified as a discontinued operation when the disposal represents a strategic shift, such as disposal of a major line of business, a major geographical area or a major equity investment. The results of operations for properties sold during the period or classified as held for sale at the end of the period, and meeting the above criteria of discontinued operations, are classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The property-specific components of earnings classified as discontinued operations include separately identifiable property-specific revenues, expenses, depreciation, and interest expense, if any. The gain or loss resulting from the eventual disposal of the held for sale properties meeting the criteria of discontinued operations is also classified within discontinued operations. Real estate assets held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell and are presented separately in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Subsequent to classification of a property as held for sale, no further depreciation is recorded. Consolidated operating properties sold or classified as held for sale, which do not meet the above criteria of discontinued operations are not included in discontinued operations and the related gains and losses are included in continuing operations. Properties sold by our unconsolidated entities which do not meet the above criteria of discontinued operations are not included in discontinued operations and related gains or losses are reported as a component of equity in income of joint ventures.
Gains on sale of real estate are recognized using the full accrual or partial sale methods, as applicable, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), provided various criteria relating to the terms of sale and any subsequent involvement with the real estate sold are satisfied.
See Note 7, "Acquisitions, Dispositions, Impairment, and Discontinued Operations," for discussion of discontinued operations for the year ended
December 31, 2016
, 2015 and 2014.
Fair Value
. For financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis, fair value is the price we would receive to sell an asset, or pay to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction with a market participant at the measurement date. In the absence of such data, fair value is estimated using internal information consistent with what market participants would use in a hypothetical transaction.
In determining fair value, observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions; preference is given to observable inputs. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:
•
Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
•
Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
•
Level 3: Significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements.
The valuation methodology we use to measure our deferred compensation plan investments is based on quoted market prices utilizing public information for the same transactions. Our deferred compensation plan investments are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements.
Certain assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These assets are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances. These assets primarily include long-lived assets which are recorded at fair value if they are impaired using the fair value methodologies used to measure long-lived assets described above at "Asset Impairment." Non-recurring fair value disclosures are not provided for impairments on assets disposed during the period because they are no longer owned by us. The inputs associated with the valuation of long-lived assets are generally included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, unless a quoted price for a similar long-lived asset in an active market exists, at which time they are included in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Financial Instrument Fair Value Disclosures.
As of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, the carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and distributions payable represent fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of restricted cash approximates its fair value based on the nature of our assessment of the ability to recover these amounts. The carrying value of our notes
F-11
Table of Contents
receivable, which are included in other assets, net in our consolidated balance sheets, approximates their fair value. The estimated fair values are based on certain factors, such as market interest rates, terms of the note and credit worthiness of the borrower. These financial instruments utilize Level 3 inputs. In calculating the fair value of our notes payable, interest rate and spread assumptions reflect current credit worthiness and market conditions available for the issuance of notes payable with similar terms and remaining maturities. These financial instruments utilize Level 2 inputs.
Income Recognition
. Our rental and other property revenue is recorded when due from residents and is recognized monthly as it is earned. Other property revenue consists primarily of utility rebillings and administrative, application, and other transactional fees charged to our residents. Our apartment homes are rented to residents on lease terms generally ranging from six to
eighteen
months, with monthly payments due in advance. All other sources of income, including interest and fee and asset management income, are recognized as earned. Operations of multifamily properties acquired are recorded from the date of acquisition in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting. In management’s opinion, due to the number of residents, the types and diversity of submarkets in which our properties operate, and the collection terms, there is no significant concentration of credit risk.
Reclassifications.
Certain reclassifications have been made to amounts in prior period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. We reclassified certain insignificant amounts in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2015
and
2014
. These reclassifications had no impact on our consolidated cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities. Additionally, we adopted Accounting Standards Update 2016-18 ("ASU 2016-18"),
"Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)."
as of December 31, 2016. ASU 2016-18 requires the change in restricted cash to be reported with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling between beginning and ending amounts shown on our consolidated statement of cash flows, and is to be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. See Recent Accounting Pronouncements below for the impact of the reclassifications made in prior periods as a result of our adoption of ASU 2016-18.
Insurance
. Our primary lines of insurance coverage are property, general liability, health, and workers’ compensation. We believe our insurance coverage adequately insures our properties against the risk of loss attributable to fire, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, flood, and other perils and adequately insures us against other risks. Losses are accrued based upon our estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred using certain actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry and based on our experience.
Other Assets, Net
. Other assets in our consolidated financial statements include investments under deferred compensation plans, deferred financing costs, non-real estate leasehold improvements and equipment, notes receivable, prepaid expenses, the value of in-place leases net of related accumulated amortization, and other miscellaneous receivables. Investments under deferred compensation plans are classified as trading securities and are adjusted to fair market value at period end. For a further discussion of our investments under deferred compensation plans, see Note 10, “Share-based Compensation and Benefit Plans.” Deferred financing costs are related to our unsecured credit facility and unsecured short-term borrowing facility, and are amortized no longer than the terms of the related facilities on the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. Corporate leasehold improvements and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the shorter of the expected useful lives or the lease terms which generally range from three to ten years.
Our notes receivable relate to real estate secured loans to unaffiliated third parties. At
December 31, 2016
, we had one outstanding notes receivable balance of approximately
$17.2 million
and at December 31, 2015, we had two outstanding notes receivable balances of an aggregate of approximately
$13.2 million
. The weighted average interest rates were approximately
4.1%
for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to such notes. At
December 31, 2016
, we were also committed to funding an additional
$0.8 million
under the note. Interest is recognized over the lives of the notes and is included in interest and other income in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. We consider a note receivable to be impaired if it is probable we will not collect all contractually due principal and interest. We do not accrue interest when a note is considered impaired and an allowance is recorded for any principal and previously accrued interest which is not believed to be collectible. All cash receipts on impaired notes are applied to reduce the principal amount of such notes until the principal has been recovered and, thereafter, are recognized as interest income. There were no impairments as of
December 31, 2016
or
2015
.
Reportable Segments
. We operate in a single reportable segment which includes the ownership, management, development, redevelopment, acquisition, and construction of multifamily apartment communities. Each of our operating properties is considered a separate operating segment as each property earns revenues and incurs expenses, individual operating results are reviewed and discrete financial information is available. We do not distinguish or group our consolidated operations based on geography, size or type. Our multifamily apartment communities have similar long-term economic characteristics and provide similar products and services to our residents. Further, all material operations are within the United States and no multifamily apartment community comprises more than 10% of consolidated revenues. As a result, our operating properties are aggregated into a single reportable segment. Our multifamily communities generate rental revenue and other income through
F-12
Table of Contents
the leasing of apartment homes, which comprised approximately
99%
of our total property revenues and total non-property income, excluding income on deferred compensation plans, for each of the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
.
Restricted Cash
. Restricted cash consists of escrow deposits held by lenders for property taxes, insurance and replacement reserves, cash required to be segregated for the repayment of residents’ security deposits, and escrowed amounts related to our development and acquisition activities. Substantially all restricted cash is invested in demand and short-term instruments.
Share-based Compensation
. Compensation expense associated with share-based awards is recognized in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income using the grant-date fair values. Compensation cost for all share-based awards, including options, requires measurement at estimated fair value on the grant date and recognition of compensation expense over the requisite service period for awards expected to vest. The fair value of stock option grants is estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Valuation models require the input of assumptions, including judgments to estimate the expected stock price volatility, expected life, and forfeiture rate. The compensation cost for share-based awards is based on the market value of the shares on the date of grant.
Use of Estimates
. In the application of GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, results of operations during the reporting periods, and related disclosures. Our more significant estimates include estimates supporting our impairment analysis related to the carrying values of our real estate assets. These estimates are based on historical experience and other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements.
In the second quarter of 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), "
Revenue from Contracts with Customers."
ASU 2014-09 prescribes a single, common revenue standard to replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP, including most industry-specific requirements. The standard outlines a five-step model whereby revenue is recognized as performance obligations within a contract are satisfied. Several ASUs have been issued since the issuance of ASU 2014-09 which modify certain sections of the new revenue recognition standard, and are intended to promote a more consistent interpretation and application of the principles outlined in the standard. We will adopt ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective with cumulative-effect transition method. We have identified our revenue streams and are in the process of evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements and internal accounting processes; however, as the majority of our revenue is derived from real estate lease contracts we do not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 or related amendments and modifications by the FASB will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
"Leases"
("ASU 2016-02"). ASU 2016-02 supersedes the current accounting for leases and while retaining two distinct types of leases, finance and operating, (i) requires lessees to record a right of use asset and a related liability for the rights and obligations associated with a lease, regardless of lease classification, and recognize lease expense in a manner similar to current accounting, (ii) eliminates most real estate specific lease provisions, and, (iii) aligns many of the underlying lessor model principles with those in the new revenue standard. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within. Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach when transitioning to ASU 2016-02 for leases that exist as of or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted and we plan to early adopt ASU 2016-02 as of January 1, 2018 in conjunction with the adoption of ASU 2014-09 discussed above. Based on a preliminary assessment, we expect most of our operating lease commitments will be subject to the new guidance and recognized as operating lease liabilities and right-of-use assets upon adoption, resulting in an immaterial increase in the assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. We are continuing our evaluation, which may identify additional impacts this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09,
"Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting."
ASU 2016-09 amends several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, accrual of compensation cost, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this standard must be applied prospectively, retrospectively, or as of the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the year of adoption, depending on the type of amendment. We adopted ASU 2016-09 as of January 1, 2017, and it will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,
"Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)."
ASU 2016-15 clarifies how several specific cash receipts and cash payments are to be presented and classified on the statement of cash flows, including debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs,
F-13
Table of Contents
settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments, contingent consideration made after a business combination, distributions received from equity method investees, beneficial interests in securitization transactions, and separately identifiable cash flows and application of predominance principle. ASU 2016-15 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. Each amendment in this standard must be applied prospectively, retrospectively, or as of the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the year of adoption, depending on the type of amendment. We expect to adopt ASU 2016-15 as of January 1, 2018, and we are currently evaluating the impact this standard may have on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, which requires restricted cash to be presented with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and ending amounts in the statements of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The update should be applied retrospectively to each period presented. We adopted ASU 2016-18 as of December 31, 2016. Prior to our adoption of ASU 2016-18, we reported the change in restricted cash within the investing activities in our consolidated statement of cash flows. As a result of our adoption of ASU 2016-18, cash and cash equivalents in our consolidated statements of cash flows increased by approximately
$6.0 million
and
$5.9 million
in 2015 and 2014, respectively, to reflect the restricted cash balances. Additionally, net cash used in investing activities decreased by approximately
$0.1 million
in 2015 and increased by approximately
$0.7 million
in 2014.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01,
"Clarifying the Definition of a Business (Topic 805).
" ASU 2017-01 clarifies the definition of a business and provides further guidance for evaluating whether a transaction will be accounted for as an acquisition of an asset or a business. ASU 2017-01 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The update should be applied prospectively. We adopted ASU 2017-01 as of January 1, 2017 and the adoption did not require any additional disclosures. We believe most of our future acquisitions of operating properties will qualify as asset acquisitions and most future transaction costs associated with these acquisitions will be capitalized.
F-14
Table of Contents
3. Per Share Data
Basic earnings per share are computed using net income attributable to common shareholders and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect common shares issuable from the assumed conversion of common share options and share awards granted and units convertible into common shares. Only those items having a dilutive impact on our basic earnings per share are included in diluted earnings per share. Our unvested share-based awards are considered participating securities and are reflected in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share using the two-class method. The number of common share equivalent securities excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation was approximately
2.4 million
,
2.6 million
, and
2.8 million
for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
, respectively. These securities, which include common share options and share awards granted and units convertible into common shares, were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as they are anti-dilutive.
The following table presents information necessary to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
2016
2015
2014
Earnings per common share calculation – basic
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders
$
436,981
$
229,565
$
273,892
Amount allocated to participating securities
(6,304
)
(2,052
)
(2,687
)
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, net of amount allocated to participating securities
$
430,677
$
227,513
$
271,205
Discontinued operations, including gain on sale, attributable to common shareholders
382,842
19,750
18,197
Net income attributable to common shareholders – basic
$
813,519
$
247,263
$
289,402
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
$
4.81
$
2.55
$
3.08
Earnings per common share from discontinued operations
4.27
0.22
0.21
Total earnings per common share – basic
$
9.08
$
2.77
$
3.29
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic
89,580
89,120
88,084
Earnings per common share calculation – diluted
Income from continuing operations attributable to common shareholders, net of amount allocated to participating securities
$
430,677
$
227,513
$
271,205
Discontinued operations, including gain on sale, attributable to common shareholders
382,842
19,750
18,197
Net income attributable to common shareholders – diluted
$
813,519
$
247,263
$
289,402
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
$
4.79
$
2.54
$
3.06
Earnings per common share from discontinued operations
4.26
0.22
0.21
Total earnings per common share – diluted
$
9.05
$
2.76
$
3.27
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic
89,580
89,120
88,084
Incremental shares issuable from assumed conversion of:
Common share options and share awards granted
323
370
384
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – diluted
89,903
89,490
88,468
F-15
Table of Contents
4. Common Shares
In November 2014, we created an at-the-market share offering program (the "ATM program") through which we can, but have no obligation to, sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to
$331.3 million
,
in amounts and at times as we determine, into the existing trading market at current market prices as well as through negotiated transactions. Actual sales from time to time may depend on a variety of factors including, among others, market conditions, the trading price of our common shares, and determinations by management of the appropriate sources of funding for us. We intend to use the net proceeds from any future sales under the ATM program for general corporate purposes, which may include reducing future borrowings under our unsecured credit facility, the repayment of other indebtedness, the redemption or other repurchase of outstanding debt or equity securities, funding for development, redevelopment and investment projects and financing for acquisitions.
As of the date of this filing, we had common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to
$315.3 million
remaining available for sale under the ATM program. There were no shares sold during the years ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, and no shares have been sold through the date of this filing under the ATM program.
The following table presents activity under our ATM program for the year ended December 31, 2014:
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Year Ended
December 31, 2014
Total net consideration
$
15,690.2
Common shares sold
209.7
Average price per share
$
76.28
In January 2008, our Board of Trust Managers approved a plan to allow for the repurchase of up to
$500.0 million
of our common equity securities through open market purchases, block purchases, and privately negotiated transactions. Under this program, we repurchased
4.3 million
shares for a total of approximately
$230.2 million
from April 2007 through December 31, 2008 and there have not been any shares repurchased subsequent to that date. As of the date of this filing, the remaining dollar value of our common equity securities authorized to be repurchased under the program was approximately
$269.8 million
.
We currently have an automatic shelf registration statement which allows us to offer, from time to time, common shares, preferred shares, debt securities, or warrants. Our Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust provides we may issue up to
185 million
shares of beneficial interest, consisting of
175 million
common shares and
10 million
preferred shares. At
December 31, 2016
, we had approximately
87.5 million
common shares outstanding, net of treasury shares and shares held in our deferred compensation arrangements, and
no
preferred shares outstanding.
In addition to our quarterly dividends, our Board of Trust Managers declared a special dividend of $
4.25
per common share to our common shareholders of record as of
September 23, 2016
, consisting of gains on dispositions of assets completed in 2016, which was paid on
September 30, 2016
. We also paid equivalent amounts per unit to holders of the common operating partnership units.
5. Operating Partnerships
At
December 31, 2016
, approximately
4%
of our consolidated multifamily apartment homes were held in Camden Operating, L.P. (“Camden Operating” or the “operating partnership”). Camden Operating has
11.9 million
outstanding common limited partnership units and as of
December 31, 2016
, we held
92%
of the outstanding common limited partnership units and the sole
1%
general partnership interest of the operating partnership. The remaining common limited partnership units, comprising approximately
0.8 million
units, are primarily held by former officers, directors, and investors of Paragon Group, Inc., which we acquired in 1997. Each common limited partnership unit is redeemable for one common share of Camden or cash at our election. Holders of common limited partnership units are not entitled to rights as shareholders prior to redemption of their common limited partnership units. No member of our management owns Camden Operating common limited partnership units, and one of our 12 trust managers owns Camden Operating common limited partnership units.
At
December 31, 2016
, approximately
34%
of our consolidated multifamily apartment homes were held in Camden Summit Partnership, L.P. (the “Camden Summit Partnership”). The Camden Summit Partnership has
22.8 million
outstanding common limited partnership units and as of
December 31, 2016
, we held
94%
of the outstanding common limited partnership units and the sole
1%
general partnership interest of the Camden Summit Partnership. The remaining common limited partnership units, comprising approximately
1.1 million
units, are primarily held by former officers, directors, and investors of Summit Properties Inc., which we acquired in 2005. Each common limited partnership unit is redeemable for one common share of Camden or cash at our election. Holders of common limited partnership units are not entitled to rights as shareholders prior to redemption of their common limited partnership units. No member of our management owns Camden Summit Partnership common limited partnership units, and two of our 12 trust managers own Camden Summit Partnership common limited partnership units.
F-16
Table of Contents
6. Income Taxes
We have maintained and intend to maintain our election as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In order for us to continue to qualify as a REIT we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute annual dividends to our shareholders equal to a minimum of
90%
of our adjusted taxable income. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on our taxable income at the corporate level to the extent such income is distributed to our shareholders annually. If our taxable income exceeds our dividends in a tax year, REIT tax rules allow us to designate dividends from the subsequent tax year in order to avoid current taxation on undistributed income. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates, including any applicable alternative minimum tax. In addition, we may not be able to requalify as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years. Historically, we have incurred only state and local income, franchise, and excise taxes. Taxable income from non-REIT activities managed through taxable REIT subsidiaries is subject to applicable federal, state, and local income taxes. Our operating partnerships are flow-through entities and are not subject to federal income taxes at the entity level.
We have recorded income, franchise, and excise taxes in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
as income tax expense. Income taxes for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
, primarily related to state income tax and federal taxes on certain of our taxable REIT subsidiaries. We have
no
significant temporary or permanent differences or tax credits associated with our taxable REIT subsidiaries.
For income tax purposes, distributions to common shareholders are characterized as ordinary income, capital gains or as a return of a shareholder's invested capital. A summary of the income tax characterization of our distributions paid per common share for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
is set forth in the following table:
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
Common Share Distributions
Ordinary income
$
—
$
1.88
$
1.23
Long-term capital gain
5.02
0.70
1.02
Unrecaptured Sec. 1250 gain
2.23
0.22
0.39
Total
$
7.25
$
2.80
$
2.64
Percentage of distributions representing tax preference items
0.34
%
3.73
%
4.17
%
We have taxable REIT subsidiaries which are subject to federal and state income taxes. At
December 31, 2016
, our taxable REIT subsidiaries had net operating loss carryforwards (“NOL’s”) of approximately
$0.1 million
which expire in years
2034
to
2036
. Because NOL’s are subject to certain change of ownership, continuity of business, and separate return year limitations, and because we believe it is unlikely the available NOL’s will be utilized or if utilized, any amounts will be immaterial, no benefits related to these NOL’s have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements.
The carrying value of net assets reported in our consolidated financial statements at
December 31, 2016
exceeded the tax basis by approximately
$1.5 billion
.
Income Tax Expense
. For the tax year ended
December 31, 2016
, we had income tax expense of approximately
$1.6 million
, and for each of the tax years ended December 31,
2015
and
2014
, we had income tax expense of approximately
$1.9 million
. Income tax for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
was comprised mainly of state income tax and federal income tax related to one of our taxable REIT subsidiaries.
Income Tax Expense – Deferred
. For the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
, our deferred tax expense was not significant.
Camden Property Trust's and our subsidiaries’ income tax returns are subject to examination by federal, state and local tax jurisdictions for years
2013
through
2015
. NOL's and other tax attributes generated in years prior to
2013
are also subject to challenge in any examination of those tax years. We believe we have
no
uncertain tax positions or unrecognized tax benefits requiring disclosure as of and for the periods presented.
F-17
Table of Contents
7. Acquisitions, Dispositions, Impairment, and Discontinued Operations
Acquisitions of Land.
During the year ended
December 31, 2016
, we acquired an aggregate of approximately
4.6
acres of land located in Denver, Colorado and Charlotte, North Carolina for approximately
$19.9 million
. The acquisition of
2.4
acres in Denver, Colorado in September 2016 was funded with cash on hand and from the use of
$13.0 million
which we had placed with a qualified intermediary in connection with a like-kind exchange related to the sale of one of the Las Vegas properties discussed below.
All of the land parcels acquired in 2016 are currently in development as of
December 31, 2016
. During the year ended
December 31, 2015
, we acquired approximately
58.1
acres of land located in Phoenix, Arizona, Los Angeles, California, and Gaithersburg, Maryland for approximately
$59.1 million
.
Acquisition of Non-controlling Ownership Interest.
We did not acquire any additional non-controlling ownership interest in 2016. In March 2015, we purchased the remaining
0.01%
non-controlling interest in
two
fully consolidated joint ventures, which own an aggregate of
798
apartment homes located in College Park, Maryland and Irvine, California, for approximately
$9.5 million
. The acquisitions of the remaining ownership interests were recorded as equity transactions and, as a result, the carrying balances of the non-controlling interest were eliminated and the remaining difference between the purchase price and carrying balance was recorded as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. See Note 14, "Non-controlling Interests," for the effect of changes in ownership interests of these former joint ventures on the equity attributable to common shareholders.
Land Holding Dispositions and Impairment.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, we sold approximately
6.3
acres of land adjacent to an operating property in Tampa, Florida for approximately
$2.2 million
and recognized a gain of approximately
$0.4 million
. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we sold
two
land holdings adjacent to operating properties in Dallas and Houston, Texas for approximately
$1.1 million
and recognized a gain of approximately
$0.3 million
. In 2014, we sold approximately
2.4
acres of land adjacent to an operating property in Dallas, Texas for approximately
$0.8 million
. We recognized a
$1.2 million
impairment charge related to this land parcel, which represented the difference between the land holding’s carrying value and the sales price. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we also sold approximately
26.9
acres of land adjacent to current development and operating communities located in Atlanta, Georgia and Houston and Dallas, Texas for approximately
$22.9 million
and recognized a gain of approximately
$3.6 million
related to these land sales.
Sale of Operating Properties.
During the year ended
December 31, 2016
, we sold
one
dual-phased property and
six
other operating properties comprised of an aggregate of
3,184
apartment homes with an average age of
24
years, located in Landover and Frederick, Maryland; Fullerton, California; and Tampa, Altamonte Springs, and St. Petersburg, Florida for an aggregate of approximately
$523.4 million
, and recognized a gain of approximately
$294.9 million
.
In 2015, we sold
three
operating properties, comprised of an aggregate of
1,376
apartment homes located in Brandon and Tampa, Florida and Austin, Texas for an aggregate of approximately
$147.4 million
and we recognized a gain of approximately
$104.0 million
relating to these property sales. During the year ended
December 31, 2014
, we sold
five
operating properties comprised of
1,847
apartment homes located in Atlanta, Georgia, Dallas, Texas, Orlando and Tampa, Florida and Charlotte, North Carolina for approximately
$218.3 million
and we recognized a gain of approximately
$155.7 million
relating to these property sales.
Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale.
In April 2016, we sold
15
operating properties, comprised of an aggregate of
4,918
apartment homes, with an average age of
23
years, a retail center and approximately
19.6
acres of land, all located in Las Vegas, Nevada, to an unaffiliated third party for an aggregate of approximately
$630.0 million
and recognized a gain of approximately
$375.2 million
, net of closing costs. We placed
$13.0 million
of the proceeds from this disposition with a qualified intermediary for use in a like-kind exchange and, in September 2016, the exchange was successfully completed with the Denver, Colorado land purchase described above. There were no additional discontinued operations during the years ended December 31, 2015 or 2014.
F-18
Table of Contents
The operating properties, retail center, and land discussed above were classified as held for sale in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2015, and were made up of the following:
(in thousands)
December 31, 2015
Land
$
59,438
Buildings and improvements
373,419
$
432,857
Accumulated depreciation
(197,996
)
Net operating real estate assets
$
234,861
Properties under development, including land
4,202
Discontinued operations held for sale, including land
$
239,063
Other assets related to properties held for sale
1,191
Total assets held for sale
$
240,254
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
$
1,654
The following is a summary of income from discontinued operations for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
relating to the
15
operating properties and the retail center sold in April 2016:
Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
2016
2015
2014
Property revenues
$
19,184
$
57,310
$
53,715
Property expenses
(6,898
)
(20,716
)
(19,608
)
$
12,286
$
36,594
$
34,107
Property management expense
(242
)
(706
)
(619
)
Depreciation and amortization
(4,327
)
(16,138
)
(15,291
)
Income tax expense
(112)
—
—
Income from discontinued operations
$
7,605
$
19,750
$
18,197
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
$
375,237
$
—
$
—
8. Investments in Joint Ventures
Our equity investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, which we account for utilizing the equity method of accounting, consisted of
three
discretionary investment funds (collectively, "the Funds") at
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, and
two
Funds at December 31,
2014
, with our ownership interest ranging from
20.0%
to
31.3%
. In March 2015, we completed the formation of a third fund with an unaffiliated third party for additional multifamily investments of up to
$450.0 million
. We have a
20.0%
ownership interest in this third fund, and it did not own any properties in
2016
or
2015
. We provide property and asset management and other services to the Funds which own operating properties and we may also provide construction and development services to the Funds which own properties under development. The following table summarizes the combined balance sheet and statement of income data for the Funds as of and for the periods presented:
(in millions)
2016
2015
Total assets
$
726.9
$
748.0
Total third-party debt
518.7
527.0
Total equity
184.0
195.3
F-19
Table of Contents
2016
2015
2014
Total revenues
$
119.8
$
114.5
$
105.6
Gain on sale of operating properties, net of tax
—
—
18.5
Net income
14.8
12.0
26.9
Equity in income
(1)
7.1
6.2
7.0
(1)
Equity in income excludes our ownership interest of fee income from various services provided by us to the Funds.
In December 2014, the partnership agreements for
two
of the Funds were amended, resulting in the extension of the term of each Fund to December 31, 2026 and our ownership interests in the Funds were increased from
20.0%
to
31.3%
effective December 23, 2014.
The Funds in which we have a partial interest have been funded in part with secured third-party debt. As of
December 31, 2016
, we had
no
outstanding guarantees related to loans of the Funds.
We may earn fees for property and asset management, construction, development, and other services related to joint ventures in which we own an equity interest and may earn a promoted equity interest if certain thresholds are met. We eliminate fee income for services provided to these joint ventures to the extent of our ownership. Fees earned for these services, net of eliminations, were approximately
$5.3 million
,
$5.8 million
, and
$8.8 million
for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
, respectively.
In February 2014,
two
of the Funds each sold an operating property, comprised of
558
apartment homes, for approximately
$65.6 million
. Our proportionate share of the gains on these transactions was approximately
$3.6 million
and was reported as a component of equity in income of joint ventures in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
F-20
Table of Contents
9. Notes Payable
The following is a summary of our indebtedness:
December 31,
(in millions)
2016
2015
Commercial banks
Unsecured credit facility
$
—
$
225.0
Unsecured short-term borrowings
—
19.0
$
—
$
244.0
Senior unsecured notes (1)
5.83% Notes, due 2017
$
246.6
$
246.3
4.78% Notes, due 2021
248.4
248.0
3.15% Notes, due 2022
346.0
345.4
5.07% Notes, due 2023
247.2
246.8
4.36% Notes, due 2024
248.2
248.0
3.68% Notes, due 2024
246.8
246.4
$
1,583.2
$
1,580.9
Total unsecured notes payable
1,583.2
1,824.9
Secured notes (1)
1.25% – 5.77% Conventional Mortgage Notes, due 2018 – 2045
866.7
867.4
Tax-exempt Mortgage Note, originally due 2028 (2.18% floating rate)
30.7
32.4
897.4
899.8
Total notes payable
$
2,480.6
$
2,724.7
Other floating rate debt included in secured notes (1.25%)
$
175.0
$
175.0
Value of real estate assets, at cost, subject to secured notes
$
1,598.9
$
1,568.9
(1)
Unamortized debt discounts and debt issuance costs of
$15.7 million
and
$18.6 million
are included in senior unsecured and secured notes payable as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively.
In August 2015, we amended and restated our
$500 million
unsecured credit facility, which extended the maturity date from
September 2015
to
August 2019
, with two six-month options to extend the maturity date at our election to
August 2020
, and increased the availability to
$600 million
, with the option to further increase it to
$900 million
by either adding additional banks to the facility or obtaining the agreement of the existing banks to increase their commitments. The interest rate on this credit facility is based upon the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus a margin which is subject to change as our credit ratings change. Advances under this credit facility may be priced at the scheduled rates, or we may enter into bid rate loans with participating banks at rates below the scheduled rates. These bid rate loans have terms of
180
days or less and may not exceed the lesser of
$300 million
or the remaining amount available under the credit facility. This credit facility is subject to customary financial covenants and limitations. We believe we are in compliance with all such financial covenants and limitations on the date of this filing.
Our credit facility provides us with the ability to issue up to
$50 million
in letters of credit. While our issuance of letters of credit does not increase our borrowings outstanding under our credit facility, it does reduce the amount available. At
December 31, 2016
, we had no balances outstanding on our
$600 million
credit facility and we had outstanding letters of credit totaling approximately
$12.7 million
, leaving approximately
$587.3 million
available under our credit facility.
At
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, we had outstanding floating rate debt of approximately
$205.7 million
and
$451.4 million
, respectively, which included our unsecured credit facility and unsecured short-term borrowings, and the weighted average interest rate on this debt was approximately
1.4%
and
1.2%
for the years ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively.
Our indebtedness, which includes our unsecured credit facility, had a weighted average maturity of
4.9
years at
December 31, 2016
. The table below is a summary of the maturity dates of our outstanding debt and principal amortizations, and the weighted average interest rates on such debt, at
December 31, 2016
:
F-21
Table of Contents
(in millions)
Amount
Weighted Average
Interest Rate
2017
(1)
$
276.0
5.4
%
2018
173.8
1.2
2019
643.2
5.4
2020
(2)
(1.1
)
—
2021
249.1
4.8
Thereafter
(1)
1,139.6
4.0
Total
$
2,480.6
4.4
%
(1)
Subsequent to December 31, 2016, we gave notice of advance repayment on our tax-exempt secured note payable of approximately $30.7 million in February 2017, which was initially due to mature in 2028. This table reflects this repayment in 2017.
(2)
Includes amortization of debt discounts and debt issuance costs, net of scheduled principal payments.
10. Share-based Compensation and Benefit Plans
Incentive Compensation.
During the second quarter of 2011, our Board of Trust Managers adopted, and our shareholders approved, the 2011 Share Incentive Plan of Camden Property Trust (as amended, the “2011 Share Plan”). Under the 2011 Share Plan, we may issue up to a total of approximately
9.1 million
fungible units (the “Fungible Pool Limit”), which is comprised of approximately
5.8 million
new fungible units plus approximately
3.3 million
fungible units previously available for issuance under our 2002 share incentive plan based on a
3.45
to
1.0
fungible unit to full value award conversion ratio. Fungible units represent the baseline for the number of shares available for issuance under the 2011 Share Plan. Different types of awards are counted differently against the Fungible Pool Limit, as follows:
•
Each share issued or to be issued in connection with an award, other than an option, right or other award which does not deliver the full value at grant of the underlying shares, will be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as
3.45
fungible pool units;
•
Options and other awards which do not deliver the full value at grant of the underlying shares and which expire more than five years from date of grant will be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as one fungible pool unit; and
•
Options, rights and other awards which do not deliver the full value at grant and expire five years or less from the date of grant will be counted against the Fungible Pool Limit as
0.83
of a fungible pool unit.
At
December 31, 2016
, approximately
3.6 million
fungible units were available under the 2011 Share Plan, which results in approximately
1.1 million
common shares which may be granted pursuant to full value awards based on the
3.45
to
1.0
fungible unit to full value award conversion ratio.
Awards which may be granted under the 2011 Share Plan include incentive share options, non-qualified share options (which may be granted separately or in connection with an option), share awards, dividends and dividend equivalents and other equity based awards. Persons eligible to receive awards under the 2011 Share Plan are trust managers, directors of our affiliates, executive and other officers, key employees and consultants, as determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Trust Managers. The 2011 Share Plan will expire on May 11, 2021.
Options.
New options are exercisable, subject to the terms and conditions of the plan, in increments ranging from
20%
to
33.33%
per year on each of the anniversaries of the date of grant. The plan provides that the exercise price of an option will be determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Trust Managers on the day of grant, and to date all options have been granted at an exercise price that equals the fair market value on the date of grant. Approximately
0.2 million
,
0.1 million
and
0.4 million
options were exercised during the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was approximately
$8.9 million
,
$2.0 million
, and
$7.4 million
during the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively. At
December 31, 2016
, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested options. At
December 31, 2016
, all options outstanding were exercisable and had a weighted average remaining life of approximately
2.0
years.
F-22
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes outstanding share options, all of which were exercisable, at
December 31, 2016
:
Options Outstanding and Exercisable
(1)
Exercise Prices
Number
Weighted
Average
Price
$30.06
65,460
$
30.06
$75.17
26,752
75.17
$85.05
12,854
85.05
Total options
105,066
$
48.27
(1)
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable at
December 31, 2016
was approximately $
3.8 million
. The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated as the excess, if any, between our closing share price of $
84.07
per share on
December 31, 2016
and the strike price of the underlying award.
Options Granted and Valuation Assumptions.
During the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
, we granted approximately
12.9 thousand
,
26.8 thousand
and
84.5 thousand
reload options, respectively. Reload options are granted for the number of shares tendered as payment for the exercise price upon the exercise of an option with a reload provision. The reload options granted have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of a common share on the date of grant and expire on the same date as the original options which were exercised. The reload options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
vested immediately. Approximately
$0.1 million
,
$0.2 million
and
$0.3 million
was expensed in
2016
and
2015
, and
2014
respectively, on the reload date. We estimate the fair values of each option award including reloads on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following assumptions were used for the reload options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
:
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
Year Ended
December 31, 2015
Year Ended
December 31, 2014
Weighted average fair value of options granted
$6.71
$5.52 - $7.38
$3.55 - $8.17
Expected volatility
18.0%
16.5% - 18.8%
22.6% - 23.2%
Risk-free interest rate
0.9%
1.0% - 1.3%
0.1% - 1.1%
Expected dividend yield
3.8%
3.5% - 3.7%
3.5%
Expected life
3 years
3 years - 4 years
6 months - 4 years
Our computations of expected volatility for
2016
,
2015
, and
2014
are based on the historical volatility of our common shares over a time period equal to the expected life of the option and ending on the grant date, and the interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the award is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield on our common shares is based on the historical dividend yield over the expected term of the options granted. Our computation of expected life is based upon historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the share-based awards.
Share Awards and Vesting.
Share awards for employees generally have a vesting period of
three
to
five
years. The compensation cost for share awards is generally based on the market value of the shares on the date of grant and is amortized over the vesting period. In the event the holder of the share awards will reach both the retirement eligibility age of 65 years and the service requirements as defined in the 2011 Share Plan before the term in which the awards are scheduled to vest, the value of the share awards is amortized from the date of grant to the individual's retirement eligibility date. To estimate forfeitures, we use actual forfeiture history. At
December 31, 2016
, the unamortized value of previously issued unvested share awards was approximately
$25.7 million
which is expected to be amortized over the next two years. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
was approximately
$27.2 million
, $
19.2 million
, and $
17.1 million
, respectively.
Total compensation cost for option and share awards charged against income was approximately
$21.3 million
, $
18.6 million
, and $
16.0 million
for
2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively. Total capitalized compensation cost for option and share awards was approximately
$3.8 million
, $
3.5 million
, and $
2.7 million
for
2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively.
F-23
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes activity under our share incentive plans for the three years ended December 31:
Options
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Exercise /
Grant Price
Nonvested
Share
Awards
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Exercise /
Grant Price
Options and nonvested share awards outstanding at December 31, 2013
634,361
$
41.59
831,298
$
59.77
Granted
84,452
64.75
314,614
65.78
Exercised/Vested
(375,316
)
47.85
(305,372
)
55.97
Forfeited
(21,686
)
62.32
(21,597
)
64.14
Balance at December 31, 2014
321,811
$
38.97
818,943
$
63.39
Granted
26,752
75.17
257,749
74.53
Exercised/Vested
(53,358
)
37.69
(313,628
)
61.10
Forfeited
—
—
(12,818
)
67.96
Balance at December 31, 2015
295,205
$
42.49
750,246
$
68.09
Granted
12,854
85.05
270,978
74.92
Exercised/Vested
(202,993
)
42.19
(398,492
)
68.16
Forfeited
—
—
(18,245
)
70.63
Total options and nonvested share awards outstanding at December 31, 2016
105,066
$
48.27
604,487
$
71.03
Employee Share Purchase Plan (“ESPP”).
We have established an ESPP for all active employees and officers who have completed one year of continuous service. Participants may elect to purchase our common shares through payroll deductions and/or through semi-annual contributions. At the end of each six-month offering period, each participant’s account balance is applied to acquire common shares at
85%
of the market value, as defined, on the first or last day of the offering period, whichever price is lower. We currently use treasury shares to satisfy ESPP share requirements. Each participant must hold the shares purchased for nine months in order to receive the discount, and a participant may not purchase more than
$25,000
in value of shares during any plan year, as defined. The following table presents information related to our ESPP:
2016
2015
2014
Shares purchased
20,797
14,655
25,728
Weighted average fair value of shares purchased
$
82.33
$
74.66
$
71.19
Expense recorded (in millions)
$
0.4
$
0.2
$
0.5
Rabbi Trust.
We established a rabbi trust for a select group of participants in which share awards granted under the share incentive plan and salary and other cash amounts earned may be deposited. The rabbi trust is only in use for deferrals made prior to 2005, including bonuses related to service in 2004 but paid in 2005. The rabbi trust is an irrevocable trust and no portion of the trust fund may be used for any purpose other than the delivery of those assets to the participants. The assets held in the rabbi trust are subject to the claims of our general creditors in the event of bankruptcy or insolvency.
The value of the assets of the rabbi trust is consolidated into our financial statements. Granted share awards held by the rabbi trust are classified in equity in a manner similar to the manner in which treasury stock is accounted. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the shares are not recognized. The deferred compensation obligation is classified as an equity instrument and changes in the fair value of the amount owed to the participant are not recognized. At
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, approximately
1.8 million
share awards were held in the rabbi trust. Additionally, as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, the rabbi trust held trading securities totaling approximately
$34.5 million
and
$37.1 million
, respectively, which represents cash deferrals made by plan participants. Market value fluctuations on these trading securities are recognized in income in accordance with GAAP and the liability due to participants is adjusted accordingly.
At
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, approximately $
22.7 million
and $
23.6 million
, respectively, was required to be paid to us by plan participants upon the withdrawal of any assets from the rabbi trust, and is included in “Accounts receivable-affiliates” in our consolidated financial statements.
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Share Awards.
In 2004, we established a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan which is an unfunded arrangement established and maintained primarily for the benefit of a select group of participants. Eligible participants commence participation in this plan on the date the deferral election first becomes effective.
F-24
Table of Contents
We credit to the participant's account an amount equal to the amount designated as the participant's deferral for the plan year as indicated in the participant's deferral election(s). Any modification to or termination of the plan will not reduce a participant's right to any vested amounts already credited to his or her account. Approximately
1.1 million
and
1.3 million
share awards were held in the plan at
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. Additionally, as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, the plan held trading securities totaling approximately
$59.5 million
and $
30.8 million
, respectively, which represents cash deferrals made by plan participants. Market value fluctuations on these trading securities are recognized in income in accordance with GAAP and the liability due to participants is adjusted accordingly. The assets held in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan are subject to the claims of our general creditors in the event of bankruptcy or insolvency.
In July 2013, we amended and restated the plan to permit diversification of fully vested share awards into other equity securities subject to a six month holding period. In February 2014, we adopted the Second Amendment and Restated Camden Property Trust Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan to clarify certain terms in the existing plan relating to the deferral of performance based compensation. Balances within temporary equity in our consolidated balance sheets relate to fully vested awards and the proportionate share of nonvested awards of participants within our Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan who are permitted to diversify their shares into other equity securities.
The following table summarizes the eligible share award activity for the twelve months ended December 31:
(in thousands)
2016
2015
Temporary equity:
Balance at inception/beginning of period
$
79,364
$
68,134
Change in classification
13,956
10,999
Change in redemption value
9,145
3,788
Diversification of share awards
(25,428
)
(3,557
)
Balance at December 31
$
77,037
$
79,364
401(k) Savings Plan.
We have a 401(k) savings plan, which is a voluntary defined contribution plan. Under the savings plan, every employee is eligible to participate, beginning on the date the employee has completed six months of continuous service with us. Each participant may make contributions to the savings plan by means of a pre-tax salary deferral, which may not be less than 1% or more than 60% of the participant’s compensation, subject to limitations. The federal tax code limits the annual amount of salary deferrals which may be made by any participant. We may make matching contributions on the participant’s behalf up to a predetermined limit. The matching contribution made for each of the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
was approximately
$2.7 million
,
$2.6 million
and
$2.2 million
, respectively.
A participant’s salary deferral contribution is 100% vested and nonforfeitable. A participant will become vested in our matching contributions 33% after one year of service, 67% after two years of service and 100% after three years of service. Administrative expenses under the savings plan were paid by us and were not significant for all periods presented.
11. Fair Value Measurements
Recurring Fair Value Disclosures.
The following table presents information about our financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
using the inputs and fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements”:
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
(in millions)
Quoted
Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Quoted
Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
Assets
Deferred compensation plan investments
(1)
$
80.6
$
—
$
—
$
80.6
$
53.6
$
—
$
—
$
53.6
(1)
Approximately
$8.3 million
and
$8.4 million
of participant cash was withdrawn from our deferred compensation plan investments during the years ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. Approximately
$25.4 million
and
$3.6 million
of shares in the compensation plan were diversified into the deferred compensation plan investments during the nine months ended
December 31, 2016
and the year ended December 31, 2015, respectively.
F-25
Table of Contents
Nonrecurring Fair Value Disclosures.
The nonrecurring fair value disclosures inputs under the fair value hierarchy are discussed in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements.” There were
no
non-recurring fair value adjustments during the years ended
December 31, 2016
or
2015
.
Financial Instrument Fair Value Disclosures.
The following table presents the carrying and estimated fair values of our notes payable at
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, in accordance with the policies discussed in Note 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements."
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
(in millions)
Carrying
Value
Estimated
Fair Value
Carrying
Value
(1)
Estimated
Fair Value
Fixed rate notes payable
$
2,274.9
$
2,347.0
$
2,273.3
$
2,358.8
Floating rate notes payable
(1)
205.7
200.5
451.4
441.3
(1)
Includes balances outstanding under our unsecured credit facility and unsecured short-term borrowings at
December 31, 2015
.
12. Net Change in Operating Accounts
The effect of changes in the operating accounts and other on cash flows from operating activities is as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
(in thousands)
2016
2015
2014
Change in assets:
Other assets, net
$
(3,551
)
$
(1,687
)
$
(1,951
)
Change in liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
(2,309
)
(15,478
)
19,342
Accrued real estate taxes
5,526
6,386
4,025
Other liabilities
(2,361
)
2,245
(1,701
)
Other
2,976
2,773
2,583
Change in operating accounts and other
$
281
$
(5,761
)
$
22,298
13. Commitments and Contingencies
Construction Contracts.
As of
December 31, 2016
, we estimate the additional cost to complete the
seven
consolidated projects currently under construction to be approximately
$240.6 million
. We intend to fund this amount
through a combination of one or more of the following: cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, cash flows generated from operations, draws on our unsecured credit facility, proceeds from property dispositions, the use of debt and equity offerings under our automatic shelf registration statement, equity issued from our ATM program, other unsecured borrowings, and secured mortgages.
Litigation
. We are also subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. Matters which arise out of allegations of bodily injury, property damage, and employment practices are generally covered by insurance. While the resolution of these legal proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the final outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Other Commitments and Contingencies.
In the ordinary course of our business, we issue letters of intent indicating a willingness to negotiate for acquisitions, dispositions, or joint ventures and also enter into arrangements contemplating various transactions. Such letters of intent and other arrangements are non-binding as to either party unless and until a definitive contract is entered into by the parties. Even if definitive contracts relating to the purchase or sale of real property are entered into, these contracts generally provide the purchaser with time to evaluate the property and conduct due diligence, during which periods the purchaser will have the ability to terminate the contracts without penalty or forfeiture of any deposit or earnest money. There can be no assurance definitive contracts will be entered into with respect to any matter covered by letters of intent or we will consummate any transaction contemplated by any definitive contract. Furthermore, due diligence periods for real property are frequently extended as needed. An acquisition or sale of real property becomes probable at the time the due diligence period expires and the definitive contract has not been terminated. We are then at risk under a real property acquisition contract, but generally only to the extent of any earnest money deposits associated with the contract, and are
F-26
Table of Contents
obligated to sell under a real property sales contract. At
December 31, 2016
, we had
$0.6 million
in refundable earnest money deposits for potential acquisitions of land which are included in other assets, net in our consolidated balance sheets.
Lease Commitments.
At
December 31, 2016
, we had long-term leases covering certain land, office facilities and equipment. Rental expense totaled approximately
$4.1 million
,
$3.4 million
, and
$3.0 million
for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
, respectively. Minimum annual rental commitments for the years ending
December 31, 2017
through 2021 are approximately
$2.9 million
,
$2.7 million
,
$2.5 million
,
$2.5 million
and
$2.5 million
, respectively, and approximately
$8.6 million
in the aggregate thereafter.
Investments in Joint Ventures.
We have entered into, and may continue in the future to enter into, joint ventures or partnerships (including limited liability companies) through which we own an indirect economic interest in less than
100%
of the community or land owned directly by the joint venture or partnership. Our decision whether to hold the entire interest in an apartment community or land ourselves, or to have an indirect interest in the community or land through a joint venture or partnership, is based on a variety of factors and considerations, including: (i) our projection, in some circumstances, that we will achieve higher returns on our invested capital or reduce our risk if a joint venture or partnership vehicle is used; (ii) our desire to diversify our portfolio of investments by market; (iii) our desire at times to preserve our capital resources to maintain liquidity or balance sheet strength; and (iv) the economic and tax terms required by a seller of land or of a community, who may prefer or who may require less payment if the land or community is contributed to a joint venture or partnership. Investments in joint ventures or partnerships are not limited to a specified percentage of our assets. Each joint venture or partnership agreement is individually negotiated, and our ability to operate or dispose of land or of a community in our sole discretion may be limited to varying degrees in our existing joint venture agreements and may be limited to varying degrees depending on the terms of future joint venture agreements.
Employment Agreements.
At
December 31, 2016
, we had employment agreements with 13 of our senior officers, the terms of which expire at various times through August 20, 2017. Such agreements provide for minimum salary levels as well as various incentive compensation arrangements, which are payable based on the attainment of specific goals. The agreements also provide for severance payments plus a gross-up payment if certain situations occur, such as termination without cause or a change of control. In the case of 10 of the agreements, the severance payment equals one times the respective current annual base salary in the case of termination without cause and 2.99 times the respective average annual base salary over the previous three fiscal years in the case of a change of control and a termination of employment or a material adverse change in the scope of their duties. In the case of one agreement, the severance payment equals one times the respective current annual base salary for termination without cause and 2.99 times the greater of current gross income or average gross income over the previous three fiscal years in the case of a change of control. In the case of the other two agreements, the severance payment generally equals 2.99 times the respective average annual compensation over the previous three fiscal years in connection with, among other things, a termination without cause or a change of control, and the officer would be entitled to receive continuation and vesting of certain benefits in the case of such termination.
14. Non-controlling Interests
The following table summarizes the effect of changes in our ownership interest in subsidiaries on the equity attributable to common shareholders for each of the years ended December 31:
(in thousands)
2016
2015
2014
Net income attributable to common shareholders
$
819,823
$
249,315
$
292,089
Transfers from non-controlling interests:
Increase in equity for conversion of operating partnership units
290
86
52
Decrease in additional paid-in-capital for purchase of remaining non-controlling ownership interests in two consolidated joint ventures
(1)
—
(9,480
)
—
Change in common equity and net transfers from non-controlling interests
$
820,113
$
239,921
$
292,141
(1)
Refer to Note 7, "Acquisitions, Dispositions, Impairment, and Discontinued Operations," for further discussion of acquisitions.
F-27
Table of Contents
15. Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
Summarized quarterly financial data, which has been adjusted for discontinued operations as discussed in Note 7, "Acquisitions, Dispositions, Impairment, and Discontinued Operations" for the years ended
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, is as follows:
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Total
(a)
2016:
Revenues
$
217,595
$
221,478
$
220,235
$
217,139
$
876,447
Net income attributable to common shareholders
41,730
446,302
290,898
40,893
819,823
Net income attributable to common shareholders per share – basic
0.46
4.94
(b)
3.23
(c)
0.45
9.08
Net income attributable to common shareholders per share – diluted
0.46
4.92
(b)
3.21
(c)
0.45
9.05
2015:
Revenues
$
201,608
$
206,432
$
212,593
$
214,985
$
835,618
Net income attributable to common shareholders
115,599
36,079
37,044
60,593
249,315
Net income attributable to common shareholders per share – basic
1.29
(d)
0.40
0.41
0.67
(e)
2.77
Net income attributable to common shareholders per share – diluted
1.27
(d)
0.40
0.41
0.67
(e)
2.76
(a)
Net income per share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of quarterly net income per share amounts may not equal the total computed for the year.
(b)
Includes a
$32,235
, or
$0.36
basic and diluted per share, impact related to a gain on sale of
one
operating property.
(c)
Includes a
$262,719
, or
$2.93
basic and
$2.92
diluted per share, impact related to a gain on sale of
one
dual-phased operating property and
five
other operating properties.
(d)
Includes an
$85,192
, or
$0.96
basic and
$0.94
diluted per share, impact related to a gain on sale of
two
operating properties and land.
(e)
Includes an
$18,870
, or
$0.21
basic and diluted per share, impact related to a gain on sale of
one
operating property.
F-28
Table of Contents
Camden Property Trust
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
As of December 31, 2016
(in thousands)
Schedule III
Initial Cost
Total Cost
Land
Building/
Construction
in Progress &
Improvements
Cost
Subsequent to
Acquisition/
Construction
Land
Building/
Construction
in Progress &
Improvements
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
Total Cost,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation
Encumbrances
Year of
Completion/
Acquisition
Current communities:
ARIZONA
Phoenix/Scottsdale
Camden Chandler
$
5,511
$
62,435
$
11
$
5,511
$
62,446
$
67,957
$
4,247
$
63,710
2016
Camden Copper Square
4,825
23,672
7,033
4,825
30,705
35,530
16,530
19,000
2000
Camden Foothills
11,006
33,712
1
11,006
33,713
44,719
3,381
41,338
2014
Camden Hayden
9,248
35,255
18
9,248
35,273
44,521
2,948
41,573
2015
Camden Legacy
4,068
26,612
12,341
4,068
38,953
43,021
23,323
19,698
1998
Camden Montierra
13,687
31,727
5,020
13,687
36,747
50,434
6,095
44,339
2012
Camden Pecos Ranch
3,362
24,492
4,836
3,362
29,328
32,690
6,611
26,079
2012
Camden San Marcos
11,520
35,166
5,445
11,520
40,611
52,131
6,921
45,210
2012
Camden San Paloma
6,480
23,045
8,925
6,480
31,970
38,450
15,154
23,296
2002
Camden Sotelo
3,376
30,576
802
3,376
31,378
34,754
3,965
30,789
2013
CALIFORNIA
Los Angeles/Orange County
Camden Crown Valley
9,381
54,210
9,377
9,381
63,587
72,968
29,769
43,199
2001
Camden Glendale
21,492
93,554
20
21,492
93,574
115,066
6,270
108,796
2015
Camden Harbor View
16,079
127,459
15,608
16,079
143,067
159,146
55,185
103,961
$
92,562
2003
Camden Main and Jamboree
17,363
75,387
1,394
17,363
76,781
94,144
16,182
77,962
47,573
2008
Camden Martinique
28,401
51,861
18,959
28,401
70,820
99,221
39,941
59,280
30,691
1998
Camden Sea Palms
4,336
9,930
3,961
4,336
13,891
18,227
8,110
10,117
1998
The Camden
18,286
115,376
3
18,286
115,379
133,665
3,189
130,476
2016
San Diego/Inland Empire
Camden Landmark
17,339
71,315
1,798
17,339
73,113
90,452
11,721
78,731
2012
Camden Old Creek
20,360
71,777
2,506
20,360
74,283
94,643
23,303
71,340
2007
Camden Sierra at Otay Ranch
10,585
49,781
5,091
10,585
54,872
65,457
23,362
42,095
2003
Camden Tuscany
3,330
36,466
4,423
3,330
40,889
44,219
16,895
27,324
2003
Camden Vineyards
4,367
28,494
3,137
4,367
31,631
35,998
14,234
21,764
2002
COLORADO
Denver
Camden Belleview Station
8,091
44,003
1,579
8,091
45,582
53,673
6,840
46,833
2012
Camden Caley
2,047
17,445
6,064
2,047
23,509
25,556
11,661
13,895
15,326
2000
Camden Denver West
6,396
51,552
7,835
6,396
59,387
65,783
8,016
57,767
2012
Camden Flatirons
$
6,849
$
72,493
$
20
$
6,849
$
72,513
$
79,362
$
6,833
$
72,529
2015
Camden Highlands Ridge
2,612
34,726
12,041
2,612
46,767
49,379
23,600
25,779
1996
Camden Interlocken
5,293
31,612
10,057
5,293
41,669
46,962
21,790
25,172
$
27,386
1999
Camden Lakeway
3,915
34,129
14,000
3,915
48,129
52,044
25,949
26,095
29,219
1997
WASHINGTON DC METRO
Camden Ashburn Farm
4,835
22,604
2,573
4,835
25,177
30,012
9,042
20,970
2005
Camden College Park
16,409
91,503
7,398
16,409
98,901
115,310
19,027
96,283
2008
Camden Dulles Station
10,807
61,548
3,376
10,807
64,924
75,731
18,163
57,568
2008
Camden Fair Lakes
15,515
104,223
10,403
15,515
114,626
130,141
40,501
89,640
2005
Camden Fairfax Corner
8,484
72,953
8,130
8,484
81,083
89,567
26,850
62,717
2006
Camden Fallsgrove
9,408
43,647
4,788
9,408
48,435
57,843
17,834
40,009
2005
Camden Grand Parc
7,688
35,900
2,401
7,688
38,301
45,989
13,396
32,593
2005
Camden Lansdowne
15,502
102,267
8,473
15,502
110,740
126,242
39,777
86,465
2005
Camden Largo Town Center
8,411
44,163
3,549
8,411
47,712
56,123
16,852
39,271
2005
Camden Monument Place
9,030
54,089
1,464
9,030
55,553
64,583
17,281
47,302
2007
Camden NoMa
19,442
82,302
51
19,442
82,353
101,795
10,455
91,340
2014
Camden Potomac Yard
16,498
88,317
1,478
16,498
89,795
106,293
26,233
80,060
2008
Camden Roosevelt
11,470
45,785
1,267
11,470
47,052
58,522
16,956
41,566
2005
Camden Russett
13,460
61,837
5,203
13,460
67,040
80,500
24,330
56,170
45,003
2005
Camden Silo Creek
9,707
45,301
2,245
9,707
47,546
57,253
17,040
40,213
2005
FLORIDA
Southeast Florida
Camden Aventura
12,185
47,616
11,393
12,185
59,009
71,194
22,702
48,492
2005
Camden Boca Raton
2,201
50,062
62
2,201
50,124
52,325
4,723
47,602
2014
Camden Brickell
14,621
57,031
11,728
14,621
68,759
83,380
25,949
57,431
2005
Camden Doral
10,260
40,416
6,527
10,260
46,943
57,203
16,683
40,520
2005
Camden Doral Villas
6,476
25,543
6,659
6,476
32,202
38,678
11,988
26,690
2005
Camden Las Olas
12,395
79,518
9,380
12,395
88,898
101,293
32,491
68,802
2005
Camden Plantation
6,299
77,964
8,533
6,299
86,497
92,796
31,702
61,094
2005
Camden Portofino
9,867
38,702
5,706
9,867
44,408
54,275
16,319
37,956
2005
Orlando
Camden Hunter's Creek
4,156
20,925
5,145
4,156
26,070
30,226
9,747
20,479
2005
Camden Lago Vista
$
3,497
$
29,623
$
4,481
$
3,497
$
34,104
$
37,601
$
12,642
$
24,959
2005
Camden LaVina
12,907
42,617
209
12,907
42,826
55,733
9,653
46,080
2012
Camden Lee Vista
4,350
34,643
6,117
4,350
40,760
45,110
21,084
24,026
2000
Camden Orange Court
5,319
40,733
2,636
5,319
43,369
48,688
12,631
36,057
2008
Camden Town Square
13,127
45,997
175
13,127
46,172
59,299
8,758
50,541
2012
Camden World Gateway
5,785
51,821
7,464
5,785
59,285
65,070
20,801
44,269
2005
Tampa/St. Petersburg
Camden Bay
7,450
63,283
12,145
7,450
75,428
82,878
37,207
45,671
1998/2002
Camden Montague
3,576
16,534
184
3,576
16,718
20,294
3,821
16,473
2012
Camden Preserve
1,206
17,982
7,447
1,206
25,429
26,635
14,567
12,068
1997
Camden Royal Palms
2,147
38,339
2,758
2,147
41,097
43,244
12,789
30,455
2007
Camden Westchase Park
11,955
36,254
169
11,955
36,423
48,378
7,287
41,091
2012
GEORGIA
Atlanta
Camden Brookwood
7,174
31,984
7,438
7,174
39,422
46,596
15,322
31,274
$
22,590
2005
Camden Creekstone
5,017
19,912
2,067
5,017
21,979
26,996
3,532
23,464
2012
Camden Deerfield
4,895
21,922
6,955
4,895
28,877
33,772
11,072
22,700
19,191
2005
Camden Dunwoody
5,290
23,642
8,056
5,290
31,698
36,988
12,410
24,578
21,136
2005
Camden Fourth Ward
10,477
51,258
462
10,477
51,720
62,197
4,810
57,387
2014
Camden Midtown Atlanta
6,196
33,828
9,290
6,196
43,118
49,314
15,596
33,718
20,534
2005
Camden Paces
15,262
102,377
124
15,262
102,501
117,763
8,789
108,974
2015
Camden Peachtree City
6,536
29,063
6,459
6,536
35,522
42,058
13,187
28,871
2005
Camden Shiloh
4,181
18,798
5,130
4,181
23,928
28,109
9,352
18,757
10,483
2005
Camden St. Clair
7,526
27,486
7,278
7,526
34,764
42,290
13,860
28,430
21,614
2005
Camden Stockbridge
5,071
22,693
3,837
5,071
26,530
31,601
10,234
21,367
14,311
2005
Camden Vantage
11,787
68,822
2,226
11,787
71,048
82,835
9,245
73,590
2013
NORTH CAROLINA
Charlotte
Camden Ballantyne
$
4,503
$
30,250
$
7,866
$
4,503
$
38,116
$
42,619
$
15,357
$
27,262
$
25,986
2005
Camden Cotton Mills
4,246
19,147
5,918
4,246
25,065
29,311
10,341
18,970
2005
Camden Dilworth
516
16,633
2,195
516
18,828
19,344
6,611
12,733
13,053
2006
Camden Fairview
1,283
7,223
3,939
1,283
11,162
12,445
5,098
7,347
2005
Camden Foxcroft
1,408
7,919
4,099
1,408
12,018
13,426
5,483
7,943
2005
Camden Foxcroft II
1,152
6,499
2,489
1,152
8,988
10,140
3,723
6,417
2005
Camden Grandview
7,570
33,859
8,128
7,570
41,987
49,557
16,267
33,290
2005
Camden Sedgebrook
5,266
29,211
7,003
5,266
36,214
41,480
14,502
26,978
21,274
2005
Camden South End Square
6,625
29,175
8,732
6,625
37,907
44,532
13,976
30,556
2005
Camden Stonecrest
3,941
22,021
5,776
3,941
27,797
31,738
11,479
20,259
2005
Camden Touchstone
1,203
6,772
2,925
1,203
9,697
10,900
4,581
6,319
2005
Raleigh
Camden Crest
4,412
31,108
5,551
4,412
36,659
41,071
13,417
27,654
2005
Camden Governor's Village
3,669
20,508
3,566
3,669
24,074
27,743
9,404
18,339
12,984
2005
Camden Lake Pine
5,746
31,714
8,333
5,746
40,047
45,793
15,924
29,869
26,172
2005
Camden Manor Park
2,535
47,159
2,448
2,535
49,607
52,142
17,650
34,492
29,631
2006
Camden Overlook
4,591
25,563
8,409
4,591
33,972
38,563
13,724
24,839
2005
Camden Reunion Park
3,302
18,457
6,037
3,302
24,494
27,796
9,797
17,999
19,931
2005
Camden Westwood
4,567
25,519
5,037
4,567
30,556
35,123
11,839
23,284
19,878
2005
TEXAS
Austin
Camden Cedar Hills
2,684
20,931
696
2,684
21,627
24,311
6,893
17,418
2008
Camden Gaines Ranch
5,094
37,100
9,595
5,094
46,695
51,789
17,738
34,051
2005
Camden Huntingdon
2,289
17,393
9,781
2,289
27,174
29,463
16,392
13,071
1995
Camden La Frontera
3,250
32,376
7
3,250
32,383
35,633
3,377
32,256
2015
Camden Lamar Heights
3,988
42,773
34
3,988
42,807
46,795
4,359
42,436
2015
Camden Stoneleigh
3,498
31,285
7,578
3,498
38,863
42,361
14,188
28,173
2006
Corpus Christi
Camden Breakers
1,055
13,024
9,004
1,055
22,028
23,083
13,403
9,680
1996
Camden Copper Ridge
1,204
9,180
8,508
1,204
17,688
18,892
13,757
5,135
1993
Camden Miramar
—
38,784
21,083
—
59,867
59,867
25,274
34,593
1994-2014
Dallas/Fort Worth
Camden Addison
$
11,516
$
29,332
$
7,250
$
11,516
$
36,582
$
48,098
$
8,298
$
39,800
2012
Camden Belmont
12,521
61,522
2,227
12,521
63,749
76,270
10,514
65,756
2012
Camden Buckingham
2,704
21,251
9,438
2,704
30,689
33,393
17,237
16,156
1997
Camden Centreport
1,613
12,644
6,240
1,613
18,884
20,497
10,497
10,000
1997
Camden Cimarron
2,231
14,092
7,115
2,231
21,207
23,438
13,663
9,775
1997
Camden Farmers Market
17,341
74,193
18,121
17,341
92,314
109,655
41,654
68,001
$
50,643
2001/2005
Camden Henderson
3,842
15,256
335
3,842
15,591
19,433
2,969
16,464
2012
Camden Legacy Creek
2,052
12,896
6,212
2,052
19,108
21,160
11,448
9,712
1997
Camden Legacy Park
2,560
15,449
7,279
2,560
22,728
25,288
13,368
11,920
13,843
1997
Camden Valley Park
3,096
14,667
13,924
3,096
28,591
31,687
26,535
5,152
1994
Camden Victory Park
13,445
71,113
2
13,445
71,115
84,560
2,432
82,128
2016
Houston
Camden City Centre
4,976
44,735
2,318
4,976
47,053
52,029
14,801
37,228
33,749
2007
Camden City Centre II
5,101
28,131
52
5,101
28,183
33,284
5,304
27,980
2013
Camden Greenway
16,916
43,933
18,563
16,916
62,496
79,412
33,584
45,828
52,320
1999
Camden Holly Springs
11,108
42,852
10,939
11,108
53,791
64,899
11,147
53,752
2012
Camden Midtown
4,583
18,026
9,292
4,583
27,318
31,901
15,458
16,443
28,020
1999
Camden Oak Crest
2,078
20,941
5,256
2,078
26,197
28,275
11,560
16,715
17,295
2003
Camden Park
4,922
16,453
4,906
4,922
21,359
26,281
4,359
21,922
2012
Camden Plaza
7,204
31,044
1,774
7,204
32,818
40,022
6,912
33,110
20,288
2007
Camden Post Oak
14,056
92,515
11,936
14,056
104,451
118,507
13,277
105,230
2013
Camden Royal Oaks
1,055
20,046
1,369
1,055
21,415
22,470
7,796
14,674
2006
Camden Royal Oaks II
587
12,743
16
587
12,759
13,346
2,760
10,586
2012
Camden Stonebridge
1,016
7,137
5,162
1,016
12,299
13,315
7,942
5,373
1993
Camden Sugar Grove
7,614
27,594
2,728
7,614
30,322
37,936
5,784
32,152
2012
Camden Travis Street
1,780
29,104
784
1,780
29,888
31,668
8,306
23,362
21,598
2010
Camden Vanderbilt
16,076
44,918
21,333
16,076
66,251
82,327
41,401
40,926
73,068
1994/1997
Camden Whispering Oaks
1,188
26,242
1,149
1,188
27,391
28,579
8,608
19,971
2008
Total current communities:
$
958,240
$
5,162,501
$
733,801
$
958,240
$
5,896,302
$
6,854,542
$
1,888,883
$
4,965,659
$
897,352
Communities under construction:
Name / location
Camden Gallery
(1)
Charlotte, NC
$
58,444
$
58,444
$
58,444
$
1,527
$
56,917
N/A
Camden Lincoln Station
(1)
Denver, CO
50,521
50,521
50,521
239
50,282
N/A
Camden NoMa II
Washington, DC
99,254
99,254
99,254
—
99,254
N/A
Camden Shady Grove
Rockville, MD
90,345
90,345
90,345
7
90,338
N/A
Camden McGowen Station
Houston, TX
35,646
35,646
35,646
—
35,646
N/A
Camden Washingtonian
Gaithersburg, MD
31,753
31,753
31,753
—
31,753
N/A
Camden North End I
Phoenix, AZ
25,530
25,530
25,530
—
25,530
N/A
Total communities under construction:
$
—
$
391,493
$
—
$
—
$
391,493
$
391,493
$
1,773
$
389,720
$
—
Development pipeline communities:
Name/location
Camden Grandview II
Charlotte, NC
$
6,073
$
6,073
$
6,073
$
6,073
N/A
Camden Buckhead
Atlanta, GA
14,836
14,836
14,836
14,836
N/A
Camden RiNo
Denver, CO
17,014
17,014
17,014
17,014
N/A
Camden Gallery II
Charlotte, NC
998
998
998
998
N/A
Camden Arts District
Los Angeles, CA
16,770
16,770
16,770
16,770
N/A
Camden Conte
Houston, TX
22,422
22,422
22,422
22,422
N/A
Camden North End II
Phoenix, AZ
11,457
11,457
11,457
11,457
N/A
Camden Atlantic
Plantation, FL
14,224
14,224
14,224
14,224
N/A
Camden Paces III
Atlanta, GA
11,127
11,127
11,127
11,127
N/A
Total development pipeline communities:
$
—
$
114,921
$
—
$
—
$
114,921
$
114,921
$
—
$
114,921
$
—
Land Holdings
$
—
$
11,058
$
—
$
11,058
$
11,058
$
11,058
N/A
Corporate
—
4,676
—
4,676
4,676
4,676
N/A
$
—
$
15,734
$
—
$
—
$
15,734
$
15,734
$
—
$
15,734
$
—
TOTAL
$
958,240
$
5,684,649
$
733,801
$
958,240
$
6,418,450
$
7,376,690
$
1,890,656
$
5,486,034
$
897,352
(1)
Property is in lease-up at
December 31, 2016
. Balances presented here includes costs which are included in buildings and improvements and land on the consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2016
. These costs related to completed unit turns for these properties.
S-1
Table of Contents
Camden Property Trust
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
As of December 31, 2016
(in thousands)
Schedule III
The changes in total real estate assets as adjusted for discontinued operations for the years ended December 31:
2016
2015
2014
Balance, beginning of period
$
7,387,597
$
6,998,233
$
6,655,139
Additions during period:
Acquisition of operating properties and unconsolidated joint ventures
—
—
61,736
Development and repositions
278,447
347,429
469,040
Improvements
65,892
66,640
52,000
Deductions during period:
Cost of real estate sold – other
(355,246
)
(24,705
)
(172,475
)
Classification to held for sale
—
—
(67,207
)
Balance, end of period
$
7,376,690
$
7,387,597
$
6,998,233
The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31:
2016
2015
2014
Balance, beginning of period
$
1,780,694
$
1,557,004
$
1,477,147
Depreciation of real estate assets
243,403
233,955
213,964
Dispositions
(133,441
)
(10,265
)
(94,043
)
Transfers to held for sale
—
—
(40,064
)
Balance, end of period
$
1,890,656
$
1,780,694
$
1,557,004
The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes at
December 31, 2016
was
$6.2 billion
.
S-2
Table of Contents
Camden Property Trust
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
As of December 31, 2016
Schedule IV
($ in thousands)
Description
Interest Rate
Final Maturity Date
Periodic payment terms
Face amount of
mortgages
Carry amount of
mortgages (a)
Parking Garage
Developer advances
Houston, TX
(b)
(c)
(d)
$
18,000
$
17,224
(a)
The aggregate cost at
December 31, 2016
for federal income tax purposes was approximately
$17,224
.
(b)
This loan currently bears interest at
4%
and will increase to
7%
on any unpaid principal balance on the later of January 1, 2018 or January 1 of the year following completion of our planned apartment project at an adjacent location.
(c)
This loan matures on October 1 in the 13th year following the year of completion of the parking garage.
(d)
Periodic payments are currently interest only, and will consist of interest and principal payments following the year of completion of the parking garage through maturity.
Changes in mortgage loans for the years ended December 31 are summarized below:
2016
2015
2014
Balance, beginning of period
$
13,161
$
3,395
$
3,395
Additions:
Advances under real estate loans
7,458
9,766
—
Deductions:
Collections of principal and loan payoff
(3,395
)
—
—
Balance, end of period
$
17,224
$
13,161
$
3,395
S-3