Table of Contents
UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
o
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-6887
BANK OF HAWAII CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
99-0148992
(State of incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
130 Merchant Street, Honolulu, Hawaii
96813
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
1-888-643-3888
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of October 21, 2009, there were 47,938,676 shares of common stock outstanding.
Bank of Hawaii Corporation
Form 10-Q
Index
Page
Part I - Financial Information
Item 1.
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Income – Three and nine months endedSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008
2
Consolidated Statements of Condition – September 30, 2009,December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008
3
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity – Nine months endedSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008
4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Nine months endedSeptember 30, 2009 and 2008
5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
6
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition andResults of Operations
23
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
52
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Part II - Other Information
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 6.
Exhibits
1
Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2009
2008
Interest Income
Interest and Fees on Loans and Leases
$
79,530
92,744
249,464
295,116
Income on Investment Securities
Trading
—
1,174
594
3,543
Available-for-Sale
46,419
35,152
116,875
104,724
Held-to-Maturity
2,179
2,870
7,115
9,142
Deposits
33
18
432
Funds Sold
320
141
1,423
1,553
Other
277
490
829
1,405
Total Interest Income
128,728
132,604
376,318
415,915
Interest Expense
12,235
17,736
43,741
65,439
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
6,394
7,675
19,523
25,780
Funds Purchased
507
15
1,410
Short-Term Borrowings
13
59
Long-Term Debt
1,207
3,098
4,239
10,304
Total Interest Expense
19,841
29,029
67,518
102,992
Net Interest Income
108,887
103,575
308,800
312,923
Provision for Credit Losses
27,500
20,358
81,077
41,957
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses
81,387
83,217
227,723
270,966
Noninterest Income
Trust and Asset Management
10,915
14,193
34,428
44,739
Mortgage Banking
4,656
621
18,777
7,656
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts
14,014
13,045
40,310
37,539
Fees, Exchange, and Other Service Charges
14,801
15,604
45,187
47,098
Investment Securities Gains (Losses), Net
(5
)
159
63
446
Insurance
7,304
5,902
17,689
18,622
5,115
7,462
30,543
47,550
Total Noninterest Income
56,800
56,986
186,997
203,650
Noninterest Expense
Salaries and Benefits
46,387
46,764
137,595
148,221
Net Occupancy
10,350
11,795
30,686
33,581
Net Equipment
4,502
4,775
13,320
13,570
Professional Fees
2,642
3,270
9,196
8,471
FDIC Insurance
3,290
321
14,091
817
16,816
19,865
56,616
59,424
Total Noninterest Expense
83,987
86,790
261,504
264,084
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
54,200
53,413
153,216
210,532
Provision for Income Taxes
17,729
6,004
49,699
57,626
Net Income
36,471
47,409
103,517
152,906
Basic Earnings Per Share
0.76
1.00
2.17
3.20
Diluted Earnings Per Share
0.99
2.16
3.17
Dividends Declared Per Share
0.45
0.44
1.35
1.32
Basic Weighted Average Shares
47,745,375
47,518,078
47,665,146
47,738,245
Diluted Weighted Average Shares
48,045,873
48,057,965
47,930,271
48,295,901
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
Consolidated Statements of Condition (Unaudited)
December 31,
(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-Bearing Deposits
5,863
5,094
13,845
401,200
405,789
Investment Securities
91,500
90,993
4,827,588
2,519,239
2,572,111
Held-to-Maturity (Fair Value of $201,118; $242,175; and $245,720)
194,444
239,635
249,083
Loans Held for Sale
19,346
21,540
14,903
Loans and Leases
5,931,358
6,530,233
6,539,458
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
(142,658
(123,498
(115,498
Net Loans and Leases
5,788,700
6,406,735
6,423,960
Total Earning Assets
11,237,141
9,689,532
9,364,895
Cash and Noninterest-Bearing Deposits
291,480
385,599
285,762
Premises and Equipment
110,173
116,120
118,333
Customers’ Acceptances
950
1,308
1,250
Accrued Interest Receivable
43,047
39,905
41,061
Foreclosed Real Estate
201
428
293
Mortgage Servicing Rights
25,437
21,057
27,707
Goodwill
34,959
Other Assets
464,637
474,567
460,787
Total Assets
12,208,025
10,763,475
10,335,047
Liabilities
Noninterest-Bearing Demand
2,055,872
1,754,724
1,592,251
Interest-Bearing Demand
1,588,705
1,854,611
1,708,183
Savings
4,365,257
3,104,863
2,780,798
Time
1,240,266
1,577,900
1,577,252
Total Deposits
9,250,100
8,292,098
7,658,484
8,670
15,734
189,700
7,200
4,900
10,621
1,524,755
1,028,835
1,109,431
Long-Term Debt (includes $119,275 and $120,598 carried at fair valueas of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, respectively)
91,424
203,285
204,616
Banker’s Acceptances
Retirement Benefits Payable
43,918
54,776
22,438
Accrued Interest Payable
9,740
13,837
12,702
Taxes Payable and Deferred Taxes
254,375
229,699
240,795
Other Liabilities
114,094
128,299
104,990
Total Liabilities
11,305,226
9,972,771
9,555,027
Shareholders’ Equity
Common Stock ($.01 par value; authorized 500,000,000 shares;issued / outstanding: September 30, 2009 - 57,028,554 / 47,937,543;December 31, 2008 - 57,019,887 / 47,753,371;and September 30, 2008 - 57,022,797 / 47,707,629)
569
568
Capital Surplus
492,346
492,515
491,419
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
37,307
(28,888
(18,643
Retained Earnings
825,709
787,924
770,373
Treasury Stock, at Cost (Shares: September 30, 2009 - 9,091,011;December 31, 2008 - 9,266,516; and September 30, 2008 - 9,315,168)
(453,132
(461,415
(463,697
Total Shareholders’ Equity
902,799
790,704
780,020
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
Accum.
Compre-
hensive
Common
Capital
Income
Retained
Treasury
Total
Stock
Surplus
(Loss)
Earnings
Balance as of December 31, 2008
Comprehensive Income:
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax:
Change in Unrealized Gains and Losseson Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
65,121
Amortization of Net Loss Related to Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans
1,074
Total Comprehensive Income
169,712
Share-Based Compensation
1,700
Common Stock Issued under Purchase and Equity Compensation Plans and Related Tax Benefits (209,847 shares)
6,202
(1,869
(1,101
9,171
Common Stock Repurchased (25,675 shares)
(888
Cash Dividends Paid
(64,631
Balance as of September 30, 2009
Balance as of December 31, 2007
750,255
567
484,790
(5,091
688,638
(418,649
Cumulative-Effect Adjustment of a Change in Accounting Principle, Net of Tax:
Adoption of Accounting Standards Related to the Fair Value Option
(2,736
(13,699
147
139,354
4,480
Common Stock Issued under Purchase and Equity Compensation Plans and Related Tax Benefits (378,382 shares)
13,728
2,149
(5,075
16,653
Common Stock Repurchased (1,260,398 shares)
(61,701
(63,360
Balance as of September 30, 2008
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Operating Activities
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:
Depreciation and Amortization
10,130
10,878
Amortization of Deferred Loan and Lease Fees
(1,754
(1,563
Amortization and Accretion of Premiums/Discounts on Investment Securities, Net
4,920
1,117
Benefit Plan Contributions
(12,302
(8,403
Deferred Income Taxes
(21,235
(32,559
Gain on Sale of Insurance Business
(742
Net Gains on Investment Securities
(63
(446
Net Change in Trading Securities
(23,707
Proceeds from Sales of Loans Held for Sale
902,169
340,955
Originations of Loans Held for Sale
(863,849
(343,517
Tax Benefits from Share-Based Compensation
(122
(1,813
Net Change in Other Assets and Other Liabilities
(5,589
(21,944
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
289,357
118,341
Investing Activities
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale:
Proceeds from Prepayments and Maturities
1,341,645
601,213
Proceeds from Sales
169,952
233,085
Purchases
(3,722,753
(864,985
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity:
44,892
43,184
Proceeds from Sale of Insurance Business
1,769
Net Change in Loans and Leases
535,023
25,509
Premises and Equipment, Net
(4,183
(12,034
Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Investing Activities
(1,633,655
25,972
Financing Activities
Net Change in Deposits
958,002
(283,888
Net Change in Short-Term Borrowings
491,156
194,585
Repayments of Long-Term Debt
(143,971
(32,425
122
1,813
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock
6,569
11,998
Repurchase of Common Stock
Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Financing Activities
1,246,359
(232,978
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents
(97,939
(88,665
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
796,482
388,272
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
698,543
299,607
Supplemental Information
Cash Paid for:
Interest
71,615
110,766
Income Taxes
56,347
75,758
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Transfers from Loans and Leases to Foreclosed Real Estate
92
174
Transfers from Loans and Leases to Loans Held for Sale
36,126
Replacement of a Leveraged Lease with a Direct Financing Lease
32,437
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
Bank of Hawaii Corporation (the “Parent”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaii. Bank of Hawaii Corporation and its Subsidiaries (the “Company”) provides a broad range of financial products and services to customers in Hawaii and the Pacific Islands (Guam, nearby islands, and American Samoa). The Parent’s principal subsidiary is Bank of Hawaii (the “Bank”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and accompanying notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements reflect normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates and such differences could be material to the financial statements.
Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.
Realized gains and losses on investment securities are recorded in noninterest income using the specific identification method.
Non-Marketable Equity Securities
The Company is required to hold non-marketable equity securities, comprised of Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (“FHLB”) and Federal Reserve Bank stock, as a condition of membership. These securities are accounted for at cost which equals par or redemption value. Ownership is restricted and there is no market for these securities. These securities are redeemable at par by the issuing government supported institutions. These securities, recorded as a component of other assets, are periodically evaluated for impairment, considering the ultimate recoverability of the par value. The primary factor supporting the carrying value is the commitment of the issuer to perform its obligations, including providing credit and other services to the Bank.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification” or “ASC”)
In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which established the Codification to become the single source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities, with the exception of guidance issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and its staff. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification is not intended to change GAAP, but rather is expected to simplify accounting research by reorganizing current GAAP into approximately 90 accounting topics. The Company adopted this accounting standard in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended September 30, 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” had no impact on retained earnings and will have no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.
Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued an accounting standard related to fair value measurements, which was effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. This standard defined fair value, established a framework for measuring fair value, and expanded disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted this accounting standard related to fair value measurements for the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities. The Company deferred adoption of this accounting standard related to fair value measurements for the Company’s nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for those items recognized or disclosed at fair value on an annual or more frequently recurring basis, until January 1, 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard related to fair value measurements for the Company’s nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities had no impact on retained earnings and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition. This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”
In April 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which provided guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased and in identifying transactions that are not orderly. In such instances, the accounting standard provides that management may determine that further analysis of the transactions or quoted prices is required, and a significant adjustment to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with GAAP. The Company adopted this accounting standard on April 1, 2009. The provisions in this accounting standard were applied prospectively and did not result in significant changes to the Company’s valuation techniques. Furthermore, the adoption of this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.
In April 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard related to disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments in interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies that were previously only required to be disclosed in annual financial statements. The Company adopted this accounting standard in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended June 30, 2009. As this accounting standard amended only the disclosure requirements about the fair value of financial instruments in interim periods, the adoption had no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition. See Note 8 for the disclosures required under this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments.”
7
Derivative Financial Instruments
In March 2008, the FASB issued an accounting standard related to disclosure requirements for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities. Expanded qualitative disclosures required under this accounting standard included: (1) how and why an entity uses derivative financial instruments; (2) how derivative financial instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under GAAP; and (3) how derivative financial instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This accounting standard also required several added quantitative disclosures in financial statements. The Company adopted this accounting standard in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2009. As this accounting standard amended only the disclosure requirements for derivative financial instruments and hedged items, the adoption had no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition. See Note 7 for the disclosures required under this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.”
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairments for Debt Securities
In April 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which amended other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) guidance in GAAP for debt securities by requiring a write-down when fair value is below amortized cost in circumstances where: (1) an entity has the intent to sell a security; (2) it is more likely than not that an entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) an entity does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. If an entity intends to sell a security or if it is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery, an OTTI write-down is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value. If an entity does not intend to sell the security or it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI write-down is separated into an amount representing credit loss, which is recognized in earnings, and an amount related to all other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. This accounting standard does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to OTTI write-downs of equity securities. This accounting standard also extends disclosure requirements related to debt and equity securities to interim reporting periods. The Company adopted this accounting standard on April 1, 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard had no impact on retained earnings and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition. See Note 2 for the disclosures required under this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 320, “Investments — Debt and Equity Securities.”
Future Application of Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which amends current GAAP related to the accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities, including the removal of the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from GAAP. This new accounting standard also clarifies that a transferor must evaluate whether it has maintained effective control of a financial asset by considering its continuing direct or indirect involvement with the transferred financial asset. This accounting standard is effective for financial asset transfers occurring after December 31, 2009. The adoption of this accounting standard will have no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.
In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which will require a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) for consolidation purposes. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the enterprise that has: (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This accounting standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The adoption of this accounting standard will have no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.
8
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) Assessments
On September 29, 2009, the FDIC issued a proposal to amend its assessment regulations to require insured depository institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. This proposal indicates that depository institutions are to prepay their assessments on December 30, 2009. Should this proposed rule become final, the Company estimates its prepaid assessment to be approximately $45.7 million.
Subsequent Events
On October 9, 2009, the Company signed an agreement to sell certain assets of our wholesale insurance business, Triad Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Triad”), to a third party. The agreement precludes the Bank from competing directly or indirectly with Triad for a period of 5 years after the closing date of the sale. In connection with this sale, several employees of Triad were hired by the third party. The sale of Triad closed on October 22, 2009 and resulted in pre-tax gains of approximately $1.5 million. Net income of Triad for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $4.5 million.
Management has considered subsequent events through October 26, 2009, which is the date we issued our financial statements, in preparing the September 30, 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements.
9
Note 2. Investment Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of the Company’s investment securities as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008 were as follows:
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Fair
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
September 30, 2009
Available-for-Sale:
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies
537,636
14,937
(462
552,111
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions
61,968
2,343
(12
64,299
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises
751
51
802
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by
Government Agencies
2,869,636
39,826
(4,331
2,905,131
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises
1,145,778
52,845
1,198,623
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities
91,668
50
(10,292
81,426
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities
4,107,082
92,721
(14,623
4,185,180
Other Debt Securities
25,081
116
(1
25,196
4,732,518
110,168
(15,098
Held-to-Maturity:
62,502
2,314
64,816
131,942
4,360
136,302
6,674
201,118
December 31, 2008
3,562
(51
3,561
47,033
1,028
(61
48,000
232,269
973
(215
233,027
421,030
8,952
(852
429,130
1,520,539
28,972
(335
1,549,176
301,453
(45,199
256,313
2,243,022
37,983
(46,386
2,234,619
34
(2
32
2,525,920
40,034
(46,715
71,907
1,463
73,370
167,728
1,735
(658
168,805
3,198
242,175
September 30, 2008
3,767
(19
3,780
47,079
117
(505
46,691
232,268
57
(2,883
229,442
423,770
3,887
(3,533
424,124
1,574,229
8,105
(9,787
1,572,547
311,537
183
(19,229
292,491
2,309,536
12,175
(32,549
2,289,162
3,033
3,036
2,595,683
12,385
(35,957
73,963
20
(1,722
72,261
175,120
762
(2,423
173,459
782
(4,145
245,720
10
Investment securities pledged where the secured parties have the right to sell or repledge the investment securities had a carrying value of $2.9 billion as of September 30, 2009, $2.0 billion as of December 31, 2008, and $2.1 billion as of September 30, 2008. These investment securities were pledged to secure deposits of governmental entities and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
The table below presents an analysis of the contractual maturities of the Company’s investment securities as of September 30, 2009. Mortgage-backed securities are disclosed separately in the table below as these investment securities may prepay prior to their scheduled contractual maturity dates.
Contractual Maturities
Fair Value
Due in One Year or Less
86,742
125
86,866
Due After One Year Through Five Years
78,078
796
(14
78,860
Due After Five Years Through Ten Years
153,559
3,384
(449
156,494
Due After Ten Years
307,057
13,142
(11
320,188
625,436
17,447
(475
642,408
Mortgage-Backed Securities issued by
Gross gains and losses from the sales of investment securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were not significant.
11
The Company’s temporarily impaired investment securities as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008 were as follows:
Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or Longer
Debt Securities Issued by
the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies
86,656
(427
1,831
(35
88,487
States and Political Subdivisions
559
323
882
393,823
71,152
464,975
Total Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities
481,038
(4,759
73,340
(10,339
554,378
612
1,591
(39
2,203
745
284
(50
1,029
18,763
73,638
148,830
(536
59,385
(457
208,215
(993
123,549
(16,641
121,482
(28,558
245,031
346,017
(18,029
180,867
(29,015
526,884
(47,044
366,137
(18,267
182,774
(29,106
548,911
(47,373
584
(3
1,431
(16
2,015
30,278
(471
552
(34
30,830
228,384
221,859
(3,693
54,780
(1,562
276,639
(5,255
817,740
(10,718
61,444
(1,492
879,184
(12,210
136,021
(5,883
140,490
(13,346
276,511
1,175,620
(20,294
256,714
(16,400
1,432,334
(36,694
1,434,866
(23,651
258,730
(16,451
1,693,596
(40,102
The Company does not believe that the investment securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2009, which was comprised of 35 securities, represent an other-than-temporary impairment. Total gross unrealized losses were primarily attributable to changes in interest rates and levels of market liquidity, relative to when the investment securities were purchased, and not due to the credit quality of the investment securities.
12
The gross unrealized losses reported for mortgage-backed securities relate to investment securities issued by government agencies such as the Government National Mortgage Association, U.S. government-sponsored enterprises such as the Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and private-label mortgage-backed securities. In assessing private-label mortgage-backed securities for impairment, management considers, among other factors, the severity and duration of the depressed price indication, independent credit ratings, vintage, and credit enhancements, as well as performance indicators of the underlying assets in the security (e.g., default rates, delinquency rates). As of September 30, 2009, the Company’s private-label mortgage-backed securities were prime jumbo, with an average amortized loan-to-value ratio of 62%, and an average credit enhancement of 6.0% of the par value outstanding. As of September 30, 2009, 63% of the fair value of the Company’s private-label mortgage-backed securities was AAA-rated by at least one major rating agency and was originated prior to 2006. Loans past due 90 days or more, underlying the private-label mortgage-backed securities, represented approximately 4.1% of the par value outstanding, or approximately $3.8 million as of September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, there were no “sub-prime” or “Alt-A” securities in our mortgage-backed securities portfolio.
Note 3. Leasing Transactions
In May 2009, the Company replaced an existing leveraged lease with a direct financing lease with a sub-lessee to the leveraged lease transaction. In recording this transaction, the Company removed $17.9 million in the net investment from the balance sheet and recorded a $4.4 million charge-off to the allowance for loan and lease losses. The Company also recorded a $1.6 million benefit for income taxes which resulted from the over accrual of income taxes from the inception of the lease through the termination of the leveraged lease transaction. The Company recorded a direct financing lease of $45.9 million and also recognized $32.4 million in non-recourse debt on the balance sheet, which was previously not recognized as an obligation of the Company under leveraged lease accounting treatment.
In April 2009, the Company sold its equity interest in a cargo aircraft resulting in a $2.8 million pre-tax gain for the Company. After-tax gains from this transaction were $1.5 million. In March 2009, the Company sold its equity interest in two watercraft leveraged leases resulting in a $10.0 million pre-tax gain for the Company. After-tax gains from this transaction were $6.2 million. The pre-tax gains from these sales transactions were recorded as a component of other noninterest income in the statement of income.
Note 4. Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
The Company enters into agreements under which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities. Under these arrangements, the Company may transfer legal control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement that both entitles and obligates the Company to repurchase the assets. As a result, securities sold under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as collateralized financing arrangements and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities. The obligation to repurchase the securities is reflected as a liability in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition, while the securities underlying the securities sold under agreements to repurchase remain in the respective asset accounts and are delivered to and held in collateral by third party trustees.
As of September 30, 2009, the contractual maturities of the Company’s securities sold under agreements to repurchase were as follows:
Amount
Overnight
25,000
2 to 30 Days
702,021
31 to 90 Days
99,621
Over 90 Days
698,113
Note 5. Business Segments
The Company’s business segments are defined as Retail Banking, Commercial Banking, Investment Services, and Treasury. The Company’s internal management accounting process measures the performance of the business segments based on the management structure of the Company. This process, which is not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other financial institution, uses various techniques to assign balance sheet and income statement amounts to the business segments, including allocations of income, expense, the provision for credit losses, and capital. This process is dynamic and requires certain allocations based on judgment and other subjective factors. Unlike financial accounting, there is no comprehensive, authoritative guidance for management accounting that is equivalent to GAAP.
Selected financial information for each business segment is presented below as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Business Segment Selected Financial Information
Retail
Commercial
Investment
Consolidated
Banking
Services
and Other
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
54,059
39,650
4,275
10,903
15,599
11,918
38,460
27,732
4,242
10,953
25,095
14,668
14,026
3,011
(42,380
(25,072
(14,952
(1,583
(83,987
21,175
17,328
3,316
12,381
(7,865
(6,195
(1,227
(2,442
(17,729
13,310
11,133
2,089
9,939
Total Assets as of September 30, 2009
3,475,273
2,548,944
253,580
5,930,228
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
61,524
33,280
3,922
4,849
7,395
11,906
1,089
(32
54,129
21,374
2,833
4,881
24,362
13,378
17,458
1,788
(42,545
(25,164
(16,800
(2,281
(86,790
35,946
9,588
3,491
4,388
(13,301
(4,993
(1,292
13,582
(6,004
22,645
4,595
2,199
17,970
Total Assets as of September 30, 2008
3,987,651
2,703,677
285,497
3,358,222
14
Business Segment Selected Financial Information - Continued
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
167,166
118,780
12,593
10,261
44,921
34,868
1,583
(295
122,245
83,912
11,010
10,556
78,761
55,032
43,086
10,118
(130,165
(78,453
(47,309
(5,577
(261,504
70,841
60,491
6,787
15,097
(26,264
(21,964
(2,511
1,040
(49,699
44,577
38,527
4,276
16,137
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
186,336
112,568
11,731
2,288
21,414
20,289
(835
164,922
92,279
10,642
3,123
73,090
52,411
54,738
23,411
(126,772
(75,312
(50,026
(11,974
(264,084
111,240
69,378
15,354
14,560
(41,196
(27,133
(5,681
16,384
(57,626
70,044
42,245
9,673
30,944
Note 6. Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefit Plan
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s pension plans and the postretirement benefit plan for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are presented in the following table:
Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefit Plan
Pension Benefits 1
Postretirement Benefits
Three Months Ended September 30,
Service Cost
109
89
Interest Cost
1,285
1,298
419
420
Expected Return on Plan Assets
(1,332
(1,522
Amortization of Prior Service Credit
(53
Recognized Net Actuarial Losses (Gains)
732
270
(119
(140
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
685
46
356
316
Nine Months Ended September 30,
328
267
3,854
3,893
1,258
1,260
(3,995
(4,565
(159
2,195
810
(358
(420
2,054
138
1,069
948
1 The Company has two defined benefit plans. In 1995, the Company froze its non-contributory, qualified defined benefit retirement plan and excess retirement plan, which covered employees of the Company and participating subsidiaries who met certain eligibility requirements.
The net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s pension plans and postretirement benefit plan are recorded as a component of salaries and benefits in the statements of income. The Company expects to contribute $12.0 million to its pension plans and $1.2 million to the postretirement benefit plan for the year ending December 31, 2009. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company contributed $10.6 million and $11.4 million, respectively, to its pension plans. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company contributed $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, to its postretirement benefit plan.
Note 7. Derivative Financial Instruments
The following table presents the Company’s derivative financial instruments, their estimated fair values, and balance sheet location as of September 30, 2009:
Fair Values of Derivative Financial Instruments
As of September 30, 2009
Asset Derivatives
Liability Derivatives
Derivative Financial Instruments Not Designated asHedging Instruments (dollars in thousands)
Balance SheetLocation
Forward Commitments
121
430
Interest Rate Lock Commitments
1,671
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
23,788
23,994
Foreign Exchange Contracts
206
464
Total Derivative Financial InstrumentsNot Designated as Hedging Instruments
25,786
24,945
The following table presents the Company’s derivative financial instruments and the amount and location of the net gains and losses recognized in the statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009:
The Effect of Derivative Financial Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income
Derivative Financial InstrumentsNot Designated as HedgingInstruments (dollars in thousands)
Location of Net Gains(Losses) Recognized in theStatement of Income
Amount of Net Gains(Losses) Recognized inthe Statement of Income
Location of Net GainsRecognized in the Statement of Income
Amount of Net GainsRecognized in the Statement of Income
(942
952
4,124
11,146
Other Noninterest Income
31
808
815
2,126
4,028
15,032
Management has received authorization from the Bank’s Board of Directors to use derivative financial instruments as an end-user in connection with its risk management activities and to accommodate the needs of its customers. The Company has elected not to qualify for hedge accounting methods addressed under current provisions of GAAP. All risk management derivative instruments are stated at fair value in the Consolidated Statements of Condition with changes in fair value reported in earnings.
The Company is a party to derivative financial instruments in the normal course of its business to meet the financing needs of its customers and to a lesser extent, manage exposure to fluctuations in interest and foreign exchange rates. Where derivative financial instruments have been entered into to facilitate the risk management activities of our customers, the Company generally enters into transactions with dealers to offset risk exposure. These financial instruments have been limited to forward commitments, interest rate lock commitments, interest rate swap agreements, and foreign exchange contracts.
The Company enters into forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans to reduce interest rate risk associated with loans held for sale and interest rate lock commitments to fund loans at a specified interest rate. Changes in the estimated fair value of forward commitments and interest rate lock commitments subsequent to inception are based on changes in the fair value of the underlying loan resulting from the fulfillment of the commitment and changes in the probability that the loan will fund within the terms of the commitment, which is affected primarily by changes in interest rates and the passage of time. At
16
inception and during the life of the interest rate lock commitment, the Company includes the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan as part of the fair value measurement of the interest rate lock commitments.
The Company’s interest rate swap agreements are to facilitate the risk management strategies of a small number of commercial banking customers. The Company mitigates this risk by entering into equal and offsetting interest rate swap agreements. The Company utilizes foreign exchange contracts to offset risks related to transactions executed on behalf of customers.
As with any financial instrument, derivative financial instruments have inherent risks. Adverse changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices affect the Company’s market risks. The market risks are balanced with the expected returns to enhance earnings performance and shareholder value, while limiting the volatility of each. The Company uses various processes to monitor its overall market risk exposure, including sensitivity analysis, value-at-risk calculations, and other methodologies.
The Company’s exposure to derivative credit risk is defined as the possibility of sustaining a loss due to the failure of the counterparty to perform in accordance with the terms of the contract. Credit risk associated with derivative financial instruments is similar to those relating to traditional on-balance sheet financial instruments. The Company manages derivative credit risk with the same standards and procedures applied to its commercial lending activities.
Note 8. Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
Fair Value Hierarchy
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for an asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. GAAP established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation methodologies into the following three levels:
Level 1: Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices, unadjusted, for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and shall be used to measure fair value whenever available.
Level 2: Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs to the valuation methodology that are derived principally from or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using discounted cash flow methodologies, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
A financial asset or liability’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Management reviews and updates the fair value hierarchy classifications of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities on a quarterly basis.
17
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The table below presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008:
Quoted Prices in
Significant
Active Markets
for Identical
Observable
Unobservable
Assets or Liabilities
Inputs
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
549,582
2,529
Total Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
4,278,006
15,972
8,382
Net Derivative Assets and Liabilities
(567
1,408
841
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of September 30, 2009
557,964
4,277,439
17,380
4,852,783
Investment Securities Trading
24,370
67,130
Total Investment Securities Trading
576
2,985
233,026
1,493,461
55,715
2,178,904
577
2,462,947
19,553
(951
3,051
2,100
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of December 31, 2008
7,251
2,553,496
78,319
2,639,066
119,275
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of December 31, 2008
24,660
66,333
678
3,102
292,490
2,289,161
679
2,571,432
27,057
8,365
702
690
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of September 30, 2008
9,044
2,663,127
27,045
2,699,216
120,598
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of September 30, 2008
The Company sold its investment securities trading portfolio during the three months ended March 31, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
Net Derivative
Mortgage
Assets and
Assets (dollars in thousands)
Servicing Rights 1
Liabilities 2
Balance as of July 1, 2009
16,833
741
17,574
Realized and Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) Included in Net Income
(861
4,155
3,294
Purchases, Sales, Issuances, and Settlements, Net
(3,488
Total Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) Included in Net IncomeRelated to Assets Still Held as of September 30, 2009
(78
1,330
Securities
Available-for-Sale 3
Balance as of July 1, 2008
25,016
30,272
326
55,614
Realized and Unrealized Net Gains (Losses):
Included in Net Income
(3,349
1,842
(1,507
Included in Other Comprehensive Income
(25,000
134
(2,180
(27,046
Total Unrealized Net Losses Included in Net IncomeRelated to Assets Still Held as of September 30, 2008
(2,894
(2,906
Liabilities(dollars in thousands)
Long-Term Debt 4
121,326
Unrealized Net Gains Included in Net Income
(728
Total Unrealized Net Gains Included in Net IncomeRelated to Liabilities Still Held as of September 30, 2008
19
Balance as of January 1, 2009
Realized and Unrealized Net Gains (Losses)
(3,581
11,954
8,373
(55,715
(13,597
(69,312
Total Unrealized Net Gains Included in Net IncomeRelated to Assets Still Held as of September 30, 2009
29
1,437
(304
(118,971
Balance as of January 1, 2008
218,980
27,588
113
246,681
(4,248
5,328
1,080
1,012
(219,992
3,717
(5,453
(221,728
(2,241
(2,253
129,032
(2,434
(6,000
(2,239
Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to mortgage servicing rights are reported as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to interest rate lock commitments are reported as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to interest rate swap agreements are recorded as a component of other noninterest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.
Unrealized gains and losses related to investment securities available-for-sale are reported as a component of other comprehensive income in the Company’s consolidated statements of condition.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to long-term debt are reported as a component of other noninterest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.
Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable market data. As a result, the Company estimates the fair value of mortgage servicing rights by using a discounted cash flow model to calculate the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are thought to be those that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of loan prepayment rates, servicing costs, ancillary income, impound account balances, and discount rates. Significant assumptions in the valuation of mortgage servicing rights include changes in interest rates, estimated loan repayment rates, and the timing of cash flows, among other factors. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had
mortgage servicing rights accounted for under the fair value measurement method and amortization method of $16.0 million and $9.4 million, respectively.
The fair values of interest rate lock commitments and interest rate swap agreements are Level 3 measurements as significant unobservable inputs and management judgment is required. The most significant unobservable assumption used in valuing the interest rate lock commitments is the fall-out ratio. The fall-out ratio is derived from the Bank’s internal data and is adjusted using significant management judgment as to the percentage of loans which are currently in a lock position which will ultimately not close. The fair values of interest rate swap agreements are calculated using a discounted cash flow approach.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, there were no adjustments to fair value for the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. As of December 31, 2008, the Company recorded a $0.3 million adjustment to fair value related to the Company’s mortgage servicing rights recorded under the amortization method. The fair value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights recorded under the amortization method was $1.5 million as of December 31, 2008 and is classified as a Level 3 measurement.
As of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008, there were no adjustments to fair value for the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP.
Fair Value Option
On January 1, 2008, the Company elected the fair value option for its subordinated notes, a component of long-term debt in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition. The fair value option was elected for the subordinated notes as it provided the Company with an opportunity to better manage its interest rate risk and to achieve balance sheet management flexibility. Changes in the estimated fair value of the Company’s subordinated notes subsequent to the initial fair value measurement were recognized in earnings as a component of other noninterest income. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded unrealized gains of $0.7 million as a result of the change in fair value of the Company’s subordinated notes. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded unrealized gains of $0.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively, as a result of the change in fair value of the Company’s subordinated notes. Interest expense related to the Company’s subordinated notes continued to be measured based on contractual interest rates and was reported as such in the statement of income. The Company repaid its subordinated notes at maturity in March 2009.
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
These disclosures exclude financial instruments that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition as well as short-term financial assets such as cash and cash equivalents, and liabilities such as short-term borrowings, for which the carrying amounts approximate fair value. The assumptions used below are expected to approximate those that market participants would use in valuing these financial instruments.
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity
The fair value of the Company’s investment securities held-to-maturity was primarily measured using information from a third-party pricing service. Quoted prices in active markets were used whenever available. If quoted prices were not available, estimated fair values were measured using pricing models or other valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for credit loss assumptions.
21
The estimated fair value of the Company’s loans held for sale was determined based on contractual prices for loans with similar characteristics.
Loans
The estimated fair value of the Company’s loans was determined by discounting the expected future cash flows of pools of loans with similar characteristics. Loans were first segregated by type such as commercial, real estate, and consumer, and were then further segmented into fixed and variable rate and loan quality categories. Expected future cash flows were projected based on contractual cash flows, adjusted for estimated prepayments. Low market liquidity resulted in wider market spreads, which adversely affected the estimated fair value of the Company’s loans as of December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008.
Deposit Liabilities
The estimated fair values of the Company’s noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits were equal to the amount payable on demand (i.e., their carrying amounts) because these products have no stated maturity. The estimated fair values of the Company’s time deposits were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses. The discount rates used were based on rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities.
The estimated fair values of the Company’s long-term debt were calculated using a discounted cash flow approach and applying discount rates currently offered for new notes with similar remaining maturities and considering the Company’s non-performance risk.
The following presents the carrying amount and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008:
Carrying
Financial Instruments - Assets
Loans 1
5,352,297
5,557,554
5,969,907
5,917,302
5,992,083
5,775,194
Financial Instruments - Liabilities
9,265,131
8,313,471
7,657,535
Long-Term Debt 2
82,437
84,318
75,000
73,925
73,639
Comprised of loans, net of unearned income and the Allowance related to loans.
Excludes capitalized lease obligations and subordinated notes which were recorded at fair value on the Company’s consolidated statements of condition beginning on January 1, 2008.
22
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements concerning, among other things, the economic and business environment in our service area and elsewhere, credit quality, and other financial and business matters in future periods. Our forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions, any of which could prove to be inaccurate and actual results may differ materially from those projected because of a variety of risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to: 1) general economic conditions either nationally, internationally, or locally may be different than expected; 2) unanticipated changes in the securities markets, public debt markets, and other capital markets in the U.S. and globally; 3) the effect of the increase in government intervention in the U.S. financial system; 4) competitive pressure among financial services and products; 5) the impact of legislation and changes in the regulatory environment; 6) changes in fiscal and monetary policies of the markets in which we operate; 7) actual or alleged conduct which could harm our reputation; 8) changes in accounting standards; 9) changes in tax laws or regulations or the interpretation of such laws and regulations; 10) changes in our credit quality or risk profile that may increase or decrease the required level of our reserve for credit losses; 11) changes in market interest rates that may affect credit markets and our ability to maintain our net interest margin; 12) unpredicted costs and other consequences of legal or regulatory matters involving the Company; 13) resumption of common stock repurchases; and 14) geopolitical risk, military or terrorist activity, natural disasters, or adverse weather, public health, and other conditions impacting us and our customers’ operations. For a detailed discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements, refer to the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and subsequent periodic and current reports, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “targeted,” and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not exclusive means of identifying such statements. We do not undertake an obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect later events or circumstances.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period information in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) has been reclassified to conform to current period classifications.
Overview
Bank of Hawaii Corporation (the “Parent”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaii. The Parent’s principal and only operating subsidiary is Bank of Hawaii (the “Bank”).
The Bank, directly and through its subsidiaries, provides a broad range of financial services to businesses, consumers, and governments in Hawaii, American Samoa, and the West Pacific. References to “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company” refer to the holding company and its subsidiaries that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
Our vision is “exceptional people building exceptional value for our customers, our island communities, our shareholders, and each other.” “Maximizing shareholder value over time” remains our governing objective.
In striving to achieve our vision and governing objective, our business plan was balanced between growth and risk management, and included the flexibility to adjust, given our anticipation of a slowing economy. We did not, however, expect an economic downturn of the magnitude that occurred in 2008 and has continued into 2009. Accordingly, we adjusted some of the strategies in our business plan. The adjustments to our strategies included an increased priority to actions that result in strengthening measures of soundness such as asset quality, reserve and capital levels, and liquidity.
Hawaii Economy
Hawaii’s economy during the third quarter of 2009 continued to reflect weakness primarily the result of slow national economic conditions and lower visitor activity in the state. Visitor arrivals appear to be stabilizing. However, visitor spending continues to decline as a result of discounting. State general fund revenues have declined 14.4% for the first eight months of 2009, primarily due to a decline in general excise and use tax revenues. Total jobs have contracted 3.1% from the beginning of the year. The statewide unemployment rate improved slightly from June 30, 2009 to 7.2% on a seasonally adjusted basis as of September 30, 2009. Residential real estate prices in Hawaii continue to hold their value better than many U. S. mainland markets and months of inventory declined from June 30, 2009 to 5.3 months as of September 30, 2009.
Earnings Summary
For the third quarter of 2009, net income was $36.5 million, a decrease of $10.9 million from the third quarter of 2008. Diluted earnings per share were $0.76 per share, a decrease of $0.23 per share from the third quarter of 2008.
Our lower net income for the third quarter of 2009 was primarily due to the following:
· The provision for credit losses (the “Provision”) increased by $7.1 million from the third quarter of 2008;
· Our Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance expense increased by $3.0 million from the third quarter of 2008; and
· Our provision for income taxes was $11.7 million lower in the third quarter of 2008, primarily due to the effective settlement of our Sale In-Lease Out (“SILO”) transactions, which resulted in a $12.9 million credit to the provision for income taxes in the third quarter of 2008.
The impact of these items was partially offset by a $5.3 million increase in net interest income due to lower funding costs and higher interest income from our larger investment securities portfolio.
For the first nine months of 2009, net income was $103.5 million, a decrease of $49.4 million from the first nine months of 2008. Diluted earnings per share were $2.16 per share, a decrease of $1.01 per share from the first nine months of 2008.
Our lower net income for the first nine months of 2009 was primarily due to the following:
· The Provision increased by $39.1 million from the first nine months of 2008;
· Noninterest income decreased by $16.7 million from the first nine months of 2008, primarily due to pre-tax gains of $13.7 million recorded in the first quarter of 2008 resulting from the mandatory redemption of our Visa, Inc. (“Visa”) shares;
· The previously noted effective settlement of our SILO transactions;
· Our FDIC insurance expense increased by $13.3 million from the first nine months of 2008. This increase was due in part to the Company’s $5.7 million share of an industry-wide assessment recorded in the second quarter of 2009; and
· Net interest income decreased by $4.1 million and our net interest margin decreased by 52 basis points from the first nine months of 2008, reflecting the effects of a decreasing interest rate environment, lower loan balances, conservative investing, and our decision to maintain high levels of liquidity.
A more detailed discussion of the changes in the various components of net income is presented in the following sections of MD&A.
24
Our actions during the third quarter of 2009 continued to be influenced by a weak economy in Hawaii and the U.S. Mainland, as well as the uncertainties regarding the impact of government regulation. We continued to strengthen our balance sheet in the third quarter of 2009 with increased funding, reserves for credit losses, liquidity and capital.
· Total deposits were $9.3 billion as of September 30, 2009, an increase of $230.4 million or 3% from June 30, 2009, and an increase of $958.0 million or 12% from December 31, 2008;
· Our Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (the “Allowance”) was $142.7 million as of September 30, 2009, an increase of $5.2 million or 4% from June 30, 2009, and an increase of $19.2 million or 16% from December 31, 2008. The ratio of our Allowance to total loans and leases outstanding increased to 2.41% as of September 30, 2009, compared to 2.23% as of June 30, 2009, and 1.89% as of December 31, 2008;
· As of September 30, 2009, we continued to maintain a significant balance of excess reserves with the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”). We had $401.2 million in excess reserves invested with the FRB as of September 30, 2009, a decrease of $254.8 million or 39% from June 30, 2009, and a decrease of $4.6 million or 1% from December 31, 2008.
· We continue to invest excess liquidity conservatively in U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes, and Inflation-Protected Securities, as well as mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association;
· We continued to increase our capital levels during the third quarter of 2009. Shareholders’ equity was $902.8 million as of September 30, 2009, an increase of $56.9 million or 7% from June 30, 2009, and an increase of $112.1 million or 14% from December 31, 2008; and
· Our Tier 1 capital ratio was 13.43% as of September 30, 2009, compared to 12.56% as of June 30, 2009, and 11.24% as of December 31, 2008. Our ratio of tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets was 14.56% as of September 30, 2009, compared to 13.02% as of June 30, 2009, and 11.28% as of December 31, 2008.
We also reduced our long-term debt by $111.9 million or 55% from December 31, 2008, using our excess liquidity from the growth in our deposit balances to reduce this relatively more expensive source of funds.
Our balance sheet is well positioned given the current economic environment. We continue to meet our near-term objective of maintaining strong liquidity and have substantial resources for sound lending and investment opportunities.
25
Table 1 presents our financial highlights for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008.
Financial Highlights
Table 1
For the Period:
Operating Results
Performance Ratios
Return on Average Assets
1.21
%
1.82
1.19
1.95
Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity
16.44
24.17
16.24
26.26
Efficiency Ratio 1
50.69
54.05
52.74
51.12
Operating Leverage 2
11.77
(12.02
(7.21
8.65
Net Interest Margin 3
3.85
4.33
3.78
4.30
Dividend Payout Ratio 4
59.21
44.00
62.21
41.25
Average Shareholders’ Equity to Average Assets
7.34
7.55
7.41
Average Balances
Average Loans and Leases
6,034,956
6,512,453
6,245,117
6,543,871
Average Assets
11,988,995
10,339,490
11,616,237
10,495,367
Average Deposits
9,131,064
7,772,535
9,036,247
7,893,972
Average Shareholders’ Equity
880,003
780,334
852,347
777,650
Market Price Per Share of Common Stock
Closing
41.54
53.45
High
42.92
70.00
45.24
Low
33.65
37.46
25.33
As of Period End:
Balance Sheet Totals
Asset Quality
142,658
123,498
115,498
Non-Performing Assets 5
48,536
14,949
5,927
Financial Ratios
Allowance to Loans and Leases Outstanding
2.41
1.89
1.77
Tier 1 Capital Ratio
13.43
11.24
11.14
Total Capital Ratio
14.70
12.49
12.40
Leverage Ratio
6.67
7.30
7.27
Tangible Common Equity to Total Assets 6
7.11
7.01
7.20
Tangible Common Equity to Risk-Weighted Assets 6
14.56
11.28
11.04
Non-Financial Data
Full-Time Equivalent Employees
2,474
2,581
2,573
Branches and Offices
85
84
ATMs
485
462
467
Efficiency ratio is defined as noninterest expense divided by total revenue (net interest income and total noninterest income).
Operating leverage is defined as the percentage change in income before the provision for credit losses and the provision for income taxes. Measures are presented on a linked quarter basis.
Net interest margin is defined as net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, as a percentage of average earning assets.
Dividend payout ratio is defined as dividends declared per share divided by basic earnings per share.
Excluded from non-performing assets are non-accrual loans held for sale of $7.7 million as of September 30, 2009.
Tangible common equity, a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined by the Company as shareholders’ equity minus goodwill and intangible assets. Intangible assets are included as a component of other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.
26
Analysis of Statements of Income
Average balances, related income and expenses, and resulting yields and rates are presented in Table 2. An analysis of the change in net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, is presented in Table 3.
Average Balances and Interest Rates - Taxable Equivalent Basis
Table 2
Average
Income/
Yield/
(dollars in millions)
Balance
Expense
Rate
Earning Assets
5.1
0.28
6.4
2.06
5.0
0.49
22.2
0.4
2.56
489.7
0.3
0.26
28.4
0.1
1.96
743.7
1.4
0.25
82.6
1.6
2.47
92.6
1.2
5.07
16.1
0.6
4.92
95.3
3.5
4.96
4,491.2
46.7
4.16
2,601.2
35.4
5.44
3,600.8
117.8
4.36
2,627.5
105.5
5.35
202.0
2.2
4.31
255.4
2.9
4.50
218.9
7.1
270.1
9.1
4.51
25.2
0.2
2.95
6.6
6.34
23.7
0.7
3.82
8.8
5.79
Loans and Leases 1
Commercial and Industrial
884.4
9.0
4.06
1,049.7
13.8
5.23
966.1
29.4
1,058.5
44.6
5.64
Commercial Mortgage
787.0
10.2
5.14
695.3
10.5
6.04
760.7
29.7
669.2
31.1
6.21
Construction
140.9
3.81
161.4
2.3
5.67
146.5
4.4
4.02
179.4
8.2
6.09
Commercial Lease Financing
464.0
3.0
472.9
0.15
459.0
10.1
473.8
8.3
2.33
Residential Mortgage
2,273.8
33.0
5.81
2,480.7
37.6
6.05
2,356.1
104.0
5.89
2,490.5
113.7
Home Equity
963.3
12.3
5.08
994.6
14.4
5.77
996.9
38.0
5.09
990.6
45.1
6.07
Automobile
304.5
6.1
7.88
403.6
8.09
328.6
19.5
7.93
421.7
25.7
8.14
Other 2
217.1
4.3
7.95
254.3
5.6
8.80
231.3
13.7
7.90
260.2
18.0
9.22
Total Loans and Leases
6,035.0
79.3
5.24
6,512.5
6,245.2
248.8
5.32
6,543.9
294.7
6.01
79.7
1.39
79.6
0.5
2.46
0.8
2.35
Total Earning Assets 3
11,327.9
129.0
4.54
9,582.7
132.8
5.53
10,933.1
377.2
4.60
9,730.0
416.6
5.71
203.5
274.3
216.8
280.4
457.6
482.5
466.3
485.0
11,989.0
10,339.5
11,616.2
10,495.4
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Demand
1,625.6
0.06
1,793.0
1.5
0.32
1,806.4
0.9
1,635.6
4.9
0.40
4,190.2
0.63
2,790.3
6.3
0.90
3,922.4
22.6
0.77
2,802.2
22.1
1.06
1,264.7
5.4
1.69
1,594.8
9.9
2.48
1,364.5
20.3
1.98
1,662.6
38.4
3.09
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits
7,080.5
12.2
0.69
6,178.1
17.7
1.14
7,093.3
43.8
0.82
6,100.4
65.4
1.43
18.1
0.12
116.7
1.74
0.11
86.0
2.25
1,464.3
1.71
1,077.4
7.7
2.80
1,191.2
1,100.5
25.8
3.10
91.4
5.26
205.1
3.1
103.4
4.2
5.47
223.0
10.3
6.16
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities
8,654.3
19.8
0.91
7,577.3
29.0
1.52
8,405.6
67.5
1.07
7,509.9
103.0
1.83
109.2
103.8
309.7
313.6
Interest Rate Spread
3.63
4.01
3.53
3.88
Net Interest Margin
Noninterest-Bearing Demand Deposits
2,050.5
1,594.4
1,943.0
1,793.5
404.2
387.5
415.3
414.3
880.0
780.3
852.3
777.7
Non-performing loans and leases are included in the respective average loan and lease balances. Income, if any, on such loans and leases is recognized on a cash basis.
Comprised of other consumer revolving credit, installment, and consumer lease financing.
Interest income includes taxable equivalent basis adjustments, based upon a federal statutory tax rate of 35%, of $329,000 and $234,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $886,000 and $711,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
27
Analysis of Change in Net Interest Income - Taxable Equivalent Basis
Table 3
Compared to September 30, 2008
Volume 1
Rate 1
Change in Interest Income:
(0.2
(0.4
(2.5
(2.9
34.2
(21.9
(1.7
(0.3
(2.0
(3.5
(11.7
(15.2
3.9
(5.3
(1.4
(1.3
(3.8
2.1
1.8
(6.1
(3.6
(9.7
(7.4
(7.1
(5.6
(0.6
(6.2
(1.9
(2.4
(4.3
(14.5
(31.4
(45.9
Total Change in Interest Income
(57.1
(39.4
Change in Interest Expense:
(4.5
(4.0
7.5
(7.0
(12.0
(18.1
1.9
(23.5
(21.6
(0.7
(0.8
(1.5
2.0
(8.3
(6.3
(5.0
(1.1
Total Change in Interest Expense
(1.8
(33.7
(35.5
Change in Net Interest Income
(23.4
(3.9
The changes for each category of interest income and expense are allocated between the portion of changes attributable to the variance in volume and rate for that category.
28
Net interest income is affected by both changes in interest rates (rate) and the amount and composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (volume). Net interest margin is calculated as the yield on average earning assets minus the interest rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities.
Due to the uncertainty regarding economic and industry conditions in late 2008 and into 2009, we focused on building and maintaining liquidity. As government programs and other factors helped to reduce some of the uncertain industry conditions, we invested some of our liquidity into lower risk investment securities.
Net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, increased by $5.4 million or 5% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to lower funding costs on our deposit balances. Net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, decreased by $3.9 million or 1% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to lower yields on our interest-earning assets. Our net interest margin decreased by 48 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 52 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.
Yields on our interest-earning assets decreased by 99 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 111 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. We experienced lower yields in all of our lending categories in 2009, except for commercial leasing, reflecting the effects of a decrease interest rate environment. Yields on our loan and lease portfolio decreased by 43 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 69 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. Yields in our commercial lease financing portfolio increased by 241 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 62 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. This was primarily due to a $4.0 million decrease in lease financing interest income in the third quarter of 2008 as a result of recording the effective settlement of our SILO transactions in September 2008. We also experienced lower
yields on our investment securities portfolio as a result of the lower interest rate environment in 2009. Yields on our investment securities available-for-sale decreased by 128 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 99 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. The lower yields on our interest-earning assets were partially offset by lower funding costs. Rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 61 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 76 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008, reflecting the re-pricing of our liabilities at lower rates. Rates paid on our interest-bearing deposits decreased by 45 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 61 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. Also contributing to our lower funding costs was a decrease in rates paid on our securities sold under agreements to repurchase by 109 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 94 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.
Average balances of our interest-earning assets increased by $1.7 billion or 18% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $1.2 billion or 12% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to a significant increase in investment securities available-for-sale and funds sold. The deployment of funds in 2009 was made primarily in debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and government agencies, and in liquid investments with the FRB. Partially offsetting the increase in investment securities available-for-sale and funds sold, was a decrease in our average loan and lease balances by $477.5 million or 7% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $298.7 million or 5% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008, as we continued to experience pay downs in balances while maintaining our disciplined underwriting approach. Average interest-bearing deposits increased by $902.4 million or 15% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $992.9 million or 16% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. The increase in average savings deposit balances from 2008 was primarily due to the continued success of our bonus rate savings and business money market savings products. The
increase in our average savings deposit balances in 2009 was partially offset by a decrease in average time deposit balances as some customers moved their deposits to more liquid savings and interest-bearing demand products. Partially offsetting the increase in average interest-bearing deposit balances in 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008 was the decrease in average balances in long-term debt. This was primarily due to the maturity of $119.3 million in subordinated notes in the first quarter of 2009.
The Provision reflects our judgment of the expense or benefit necessary to achieve the appropriate amount of the Allowance. We maintain the Allowance at levels adequate to cover our estimate of probable credit losses as of the end of the reporting period. The Allowance is determined through detailed quarterly analyses of the loan and lease portfolio. The Allowance is based on our loss experience and changes in the economic environment, as well as an ongoing assessment of our credit quality. We recorded a Provision of $27.5 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to a Provision of $20.4 million in the third quarter of 2008. We recorded a Provision of $81.1 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to a Provision of $42.0 million for the first nine months of 2008. The higher Provision recorded in 2009, a result of our quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the Allowance, was primarily due to increased risk in our mortgage-related consumer lending, commercial and industrial, and commercial real estate portfolios due to continued economic weakness in Hawaii and the U.S. Mainland. For further discussion on the Allowance, see the “Corporate Risk Profile — Reserve for Credit Losses” section in MD&A.
Noninterest income decreased by $0.2 million or less than 1% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $16.7 million or 8% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.
Trust and asset management income decreased by $3.3 million or 23% in third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in
2008. This decrease was primarily due to a $2.2 million decrease in mutual fund management fees, which were adversely affected by increases in fee waivers in our money market mutual funds due to low yields, combined with the decline in the value of the equity markets. Also contributing to the decrease in trust and asset management income was a $0.3 million decrease in employee benefit trust fees, and a $0.2 million decrease each in special service fees and investment management fees. Trust and asset management income decreased by $10.3 million or 23% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, primarily due to a $5.4 million decrease in mutual fund management fees, which were adversely affected by the increases in fee waivers and the decline in the value of the equity markets noted above. Also contributing to the decrease in trust and asset management income was a $1.0 million decrease in employee benefit trust fees, a $0.8 million decrease in special services fees, a $0.7 million decrease each in agency fees and investment management fees, and a $0.5 million decrease each in testamentary trust fees, and revocable and irrevocable trust fees. These fees are in large part based upon the market value of the assets that we manage. Total trust assets under administration were $9.9 billion as of September 30, 2009, $9.8 billion as of December 31, 2008, and $11.3 billion as of September 30, 2008.
Mortgage banking income increased by $4.0 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. This increase was primarily due to higher loan origination volume for the quarter, the result of higher refinancing activity due to lower interest rates on conforming saleable mortgage-based products in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Residential mortgage loan originations were $221.3 million in the third quarter of 2009, a $63.9 million or 41% increase compared to the same period in 2008. Residential mortgage loan sales were $208.3 million in the third quarter of 2009, a $133.0 million increase compared to the same period in 2008. Mortgage banking income increased by $11.1 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. This increase was primarily due to higher loan origination volume for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Residential mortgage loan originations were $1.0 billion for the first
30
nine months of 2009, a $339.0 million or 50% increase compared to the same period in 2008. Residential mortgage loan sales were $873.6 million for the first nine months of 2009, a $524.9 million increase compared to the same period in 2008.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $1.0 million or 7% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $2.8 million or 7% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. The increases in service charges on deposit accounts from 2008 were primarily due to higher account analysis fees on analyzed business checking accounts as a result of lower earnings credit rates on customer accounts. This was partially offset by a decrease in monthly service fees resulting from the introduction of our free checking product in July 2008.
Fees, exchange, and other service charges decreased by $0.8 million or 5% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $1.9 million or 4% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. The decrease in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 was primarily due to lower ATM and credit card fee income. The decrease for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 was primarily due to the decrease in ATM fee income as well as lower merchant services income. This was the result of lower transaction volume during 2009 which was impacted by a slow economy in Hawaii and lower levels of visitor arrivals.
Insurance income increased by $1.4 million or 24% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. This increase was primarily due to a $2.6 million increase in contingent commission income, partially offset by a $0.9 million decrease in commission and brokerage income and a $0.2 million decrease in income from annuity and life insurance products. Insurance income decreased by $0.9 million or 5% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily due to a $1.6 million decrease in commission and brokerage income and a $1.0 million decrease in income from annuity and life insurance products. This was partially offset by a $1.8 million increase in contingent commission income.
In June 2009, we sold our retail insurance brokerage operation, Bank of Hawaii Insurance Services, Inc. to a third party and recognized a pre-tax gain of $0.9 million. This sale primarily explains the decline in commission and brokerage income during the third quarter of 2009. As of September 30, 2009, we continued to operate our wholesale insurance business, Triad Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Triad”). On October 9, 2009, we signed an agreement to sell certain assets of Triad to a third party. The sale of Triad closed on October 22, 2009 and resulted in pre-tax gains of approximately $1.5 million that will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Other noninterest income decreased by $2.3 million or 31% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily due to a $0.7 million decrease each in income from bank-owned life insurance, our customer-related interest rate swap program, and in the unrealized gains related to our subordinated notes recorded in the third quarter of 2008. Other noninterest income decreased by $17.0 million or 36% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily due to pre-tax gains of $13.7 million recorded in the first quarter of 2008 resulting from the mandatory redemption of our Visa shares. Also contributing to the decrease in other income was $2.0 million in unrealized gains related to our subordinated notes recorded in 2008.
Noninterest expense decreased by $2.8 million or 3% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $2.6 million or 1% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.
Table 4 presents the components of salaries and benefits expense for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 and 2008.
Table 4
Salaries
29,988
30,190
90,565
89,112
Incentive Compensation
5,524
5,969
12,223
16,358
Share-Based Compensation and Cash Grantsfor the Purchase of Company Stock
595
1,180
1,986
8,592
Commission Expense
1,523
1,653
5,528
5,518
Retirement and Other Benefits
3,962
3,097
11,822
Payroll Taxes
2,176
2,162
8,020
8,067
Medical, Dental, and Life Insurance
2,619
2,452
6,519
7,421
Separation Expense
61
369
1,331
Total Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits expense decreased by $0.4 million or less than 1% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Salaries and benefits expense decreased by $10.6 million or 7% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily due to a $6.6 million decrease in share-based compensation and cash grants for the purchase of Company stock, as well as a $4.1 million decrease in incentive compensation expense, reflecting lower levels of profitability.
Net occupancy expense decreased by $1.4 million or 12% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $2.9 million or 9% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. The decrease in net occupancy expense in the third quarter of 2009 was primarily due to a $0.7 million decrease in utilities expense and a $0.3 million decrease in depreciation and amortization expense. The decrease in net occupancy expense for the first nine months of 2009 was primarily due to a $1.3 million decrease in utilities expense and a $0.7 million decrease in depreciation and amortization expense.
Professional fees decreased by $0.6 million or 19% in the third quarter of 2009. This decrease was primarily due to lower expenses incurred in our Investment Services segment. Professional fees increased by $0.7 million or 9% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. This increase was due to a $0.7 million increase in legal fees.
FDIC insurance expense increased by $3.0 million in the third quarter of 2009 and by $13.3 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008. The increase in FDIC insurance expense in the third quarter and the first nine months of 2009 was primarily due to higher deposit balances, higher assessment rates, and our participation in the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. The increase in FDIC insurance expense for the first nine months of 2009 was also due in part to the Company’s $5.7 million share of an industry-wide assessment by the FDIC which was recorded in the second quarter of 2009. In 2008 and into 2009, we utilized credits from the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 which were available to offset our deposit insurance assessments. We fully utilized these credits in March 2009.
Other noninterest expense decreased by $3.0 million or 15% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily due to:
· $0.6 million decrease in operational losses;
· $0.4 million decrease in each of the categories of business development and travel, unrealized gains related to deferred compensation arrangements, and data services;
· $0.3 million decrease in advertising expense; and
· $0.1 million decrease in each of the categories of dealer reserve, education and recruitment, telephone, delivery and postage, and other taxes.
Other noninterest expense decreased by $2.8 million or 5% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily due to:
· $2.3 million reduction in contributions to the Bank of Hawaii Charitable Foundation;
· $1.7 million decrease in our reserves for legal contingencies;
· $1.1 million decrease in business development and travel expense;
· $1.0 million expense related to a call premium on our Capital Securities recorded in 2008;
· $0.8 million decrease in delivery and postage services;
· $0.7 million decrease in each of the categories of advertising and unrealized gains related to deferred compensation arrangements;
· $0.5 million decrease in education and recruitment; and
· $0.4 million decrease in each of the categories of data services, and merchant transaction and card processing fees.
These decreases in other noninterest expense for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 were partially offset by:
· $5.6 million reversal of contingency accruals related to Visa legal matters recorded in the first quarter of 2008; and
· $0.9 million premium related to the early repayment of our privately placed notes recorded in the first quarter of 2009.
Table 5 presents our provision for income taxes and effective tax rates for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 and 2008.
Provision for Income Taxes and Effective Tax Rates
Table 5
Effective Tax Rates
32.71
32.44
27.37
The lower effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2009 was primarily due to the effective settlement of our SILO transactions recorded in September 2008, which resulted in a $12.9 million credit to the provision for income taxes in September 2008.
The lower effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2009 was primarily due to the effective settlement of our SILO transactions. Also contributing to the lower effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2008 was the tax effects related to the sale of our equity interest in an aircraft leveraged lease in March 2008. The pre-tax gain from the aircraft sale would have resulted in an income tax expense of approximately $4.6 million based on statutory income tax rates. However, due to the timing of the sale and the adjustment of previously recognized income tax liabilities, this transaction resulted in a $1.4 million income tax benefit. As a result, the total income tax benefit from this transaction was approximately $6.0 million.
Analysis of Statements of Condition
The carrying value of our investment securities, excluding trading securities, was $5.0 billion as of September 30, 2009, and $2.8 billion as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008. The increase in the carrying value of our investment securities during 2009 was primarily due to investments made
in debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies. These investments in high grade securities with relatively short durations, allow us to maintain flexibility to redeploy funds should such opportunities arise.
Gross unrealized losses on our temporarily impaired investment securities were $15.1 million as of September 30, 2009, $47.4 million as of December 31, 2008, and $40.1 million as of September 30, 2008. Gross unrealized losses related to our temporarily impaired investment securities decreased from December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 primarily due to favorable movements in market interest rates as well as the sale of several private-label mortgage-backed securities which had recovered to their amortized cost bases in 2009.
As of September 30, 2009, we did not own any subordinated debt, or preferred or common stock of the Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. Table 6 presents the par value, amortized cost, and fair value of our debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation as of September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, we owned private-label mortgage-backed securities with an estimated fair value of $81.4 million. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
Investment Securities Issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association
and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Table 6
Par Value
Amortized Cost
Federal National Mortgage Association
250
252
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
500
499
535
Subtotal
750
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises
686,560
687,621
718,506
589,951
590,099
616,419
1,276,511
1,277,720
1,334,925
1,277,261
1,278,471
1,335,727
Table 7 presents the composition of our loan and lease portfolio by major categories.
Loan and Lease Portfolio Balances
Table 7
June 30,
March 31,
845,056
932,444
1,000,640
1,053,781
1,077,314
777,498
788,226
726,193
740,779
708,961
137,414
140,455
153,754
153,952
153,364
Lease Financing
458,696
468,030
454,822
468,140
467,279
Total Commercial
2,218,664
2,329,155
2,335,409
2,416,652
2,406,918
Consumer
2,246,729
2,309,971
2,402,061
2,461,824
2,478,925
952,076
977,632
1,016,381
1,033,221
1,004,437
299,657
309,877
343,642
369,789
395,015
Other 1
214,232
223,276
241,233
248,747
254,163
Total Consumer
3,712,694
3,820,756
4,003,317
4,113,581
4,132,540
6,149,911
6,338,726
1 Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.
Loans and leases represent our largest category of interest earning assets and the largest source of interest income. Total loans and leases as of September 30, 2009 decreased by $598.9 million or 9% from December 31, 2008 and decreased by $608.1 million or 9% from September 30, 2008.
Commercial loans and leases as of September 30, 2009 decreased by $198.0 million or 8% from December 31, 2008 and decreased by $188.3 million or 8% from September 30, 2008. The decrease in our commercial and industrial lending portfolio was primarily due to continued payoffs by corporate national customers. The decrease in our construction lending portfolio was consistent with the slow economy in Hawaii. This was partially offset by an increase in our commercial
mortgage portfolio primarily due to one new commercial credit added in the second quarter of 2009. While we continue to lend to credit worthy customers, we remain cautious in our lending approach in the current economic environment. Consumer loans and leases as of September 30, 2009 decreased by $400.9 million or 10% from December 31, 2008 and decreased by $419.8 million or 10% from September 30, 2008. We continued to experience higher levels of refinancing activity in the third quarter of 2009, albeit at lower levels compared to the second quarter of 2009, as a result of lower interest rates on mortgage-based products. Balances in other consumer loan categories have decreased as a result of reduced customer demand in a slow economy in Hawaii as well as our disciplined underwriting approach.
35
Table 8 presents the composition of our loan and lease portfolio by geographic area and by major categories.
Geographic Distribution of Loan and Lease Portfolio
Table 8
Hawaii
649,686
685,333
661,733
707,433
697,426
701,712
701,135
640,224
646,280
628,732
133,668
134,638
146,258
145,208
142,719
43,079
45,507
50,311
50,622
50,294
U.S. Mainland 1
121,495
171,062
232,772
228,149
242,642
4,050
14,086
14,210
14,405
4,695
3,746
5,817
6,220
6,438
8,655
378,605
385,064
372,008
385,181
387,160
Guam
62,599
64,151
73,595
77,507
78,700
68,205
69,667
70,056
78,291
73,240
1,276
2,306
1,990
17,848
18,293
14,479
13,181
10,962
Other Pacific Islands
7,557
8,470
9,343
12,177
14,660
1,409
1,510
1,609
1,703
2,188
Foreign 2
3,719
3,428
23,197
28,515
43,886
2,122
1,828
94
100
106
19,164
19,166
18,024
19,156
18,863
2,046,966
2,103,104
2,189,237
2,242,637
2,255,970
908,051
931,010
967,570
982,379
953,078
216,843
219,346
239,960
256,131
271,568
Other 3
163,092
167,695
181,102
185,479
189,417
21,093
23,222
25,876
28,034
29,473
32,675
36,302
41,785
45,559
48,631
192,078
198,941
204,902
210,987
214,748
19,884
20,223
19,726
19,546
18,625
46,095
49,799
56,665
61,907
67,600
25,639
27,475
29,518
30,992
31,961
7,685
7,926
7,922
8,200
8,207
3,048
3,177
3,209
3,262
3,261
4,044
4,430
5,232
6,192
7,216
25,497
28,096
30,609
32,271
32,780
1 For secured loans and leases, classification as U.S. Mainland is made based on where the collateral is located. For unsecured loans and leases, classification as U.S. Mainland is made based on the location where the majority of the borrower’s business operations are conducted.
2 Loans classified as Foreign represent those which are recorded in the Company’s international business units. Lease financing classified as Foreign represent those with air transportation carriers based outside the United States.
3 Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.
36
Our commercial and consumer lending activities are concentrated primarily in Hawaii and the Pacific Islands. Our commercial loan and lease portfolio to borrowers based on the U.S. Mainland includes participation in shared national credits and leveraged lease financing. Our consumer loan and lease portfolio includes limited lending activities on the U.S. Mainland.
Table 9 presents the major components of other assets as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008.
Table 9
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
200,986
196,043
194,420
Federal and State Tax Deposits
82,500
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank Stock
79,723
79,705
79,635
Low-Income Housing and Other Equity Investments
27,146
30,920
31,945
38,870
10,232
Accounts Receivable
16,109
17,607
19,461
32,387
28,922
42,594
Total Other Assets
Other assets as of September 30, 2009 decreased by $9.9 million or 2% from December 31, 2008. The decrease in other assets from December 31, 2008 was primarily due to a $10.5 million decrease in the estimated fair value of our customer-related interest rate swap accounts, which have off-setting amounts recorded in other liabilities. Also contributing to the decrease in total other assets was a $3.8 million decrease in low-income housing and other equity investments primarily due to amortization of these investments recorded over this period. This was partially offset by a $4.9 million increase in bank-owned life insurance.
Other assets as of September 30, 2009 increased by $3.8 million or less than 1% from September 30, 2008. The increase in total other assets from September 30, 2008 was primarily due to a $15.1 million increase in the estimated fair
value of our customer-related interest rate swap accounts, partially offset by a $6.5 million decrease in receivable balances related to the sale of investment securities which were in the process of settlement as of period end, and a $4.8 million decrease in low-income housing and other equity investments.
As of September 30, 2009, the carrying value of our Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (“FHLB”) stock was $61.3 million. Management expects the Company to remain a member institution of the FHLB and believes that there is no impairment related to the carrying amount of the Company’s FHLB stock as of September 30, 2009. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to our accounting and impairment policy.
37
Table 10 presents the composition of our deposits by major customer categories.
Table 10
4,776,626
4,747,612
4,702,494
4,593,248
4,460,965
4,002,068
3,828,521
3,645,842
3,221,668
2,835,699
Public and Other
471,406
443,528
864,455
477,182
361,820
9,019,661
9,212,791
Deposit balances as of September 30, 2009 increased by $958.0 million or 12% from December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily due to an $835.1 million increase in our business money market savings accounts and a $406.7 million increase in our bonus rate savings products. This was partially offset by a $154.6 million decrease in public interest-bearing demand accounts and a $119.6 million decrease in business time deposits of $100,000 or more.
Deposit balances as of September 30, 2009 increased by $1.6 billion or 21% from September 30, 2008. The increase was primarily due to a $1.0 billion increase in our business money market savings accounts, a $484.0 million increase in our bonus rate savings products, and a $301.5 million increase in our analyzed business checking accounts. This was partially offset by a $162.5 million decrease in business time deposits of $100,000 or more.
Table 11 presents the composition of our savings deposits.
Savings Deposits
Table 11
Money Market
2,008,094
1,769,023
1,607,375
1,173,132
965,149
Regular Savings
2,357,163
2,285,016
2,298,334
1,931,731
1,815,649
Total Savings Deposits
4,054,039
3,905,709
Table 12 presents our quarterly average balance of time deposits of $100,000 or more.
Average Time Deposits of $100,000 or More
Table 12
Average Time Deposits
709,323
738,488
851,582
891,922
934,845
Borrowings and Long-Term Debt
Borrowings consisted of funds purchased and short-term borrowings, including commercial paper. Borrowings were $15.9 million as of September 30, 2009, a $4.8 million or 23% decrease from December 31, 2008, and a $184.5 million or 92% decrease from September 30, 2008. We manage the level of our borrowings to provide adequate sources of liquidity.
Due to our high level of deposits and increased capital levels,
we reduced the level of borrowings as a source of funds.
Long-term debt was $91.4 million as of September 30, 2009, a $111.9 million or 55% decrease from December 31, 2008, and a $113.2 million or 55% decrease from September 30, 2008. The decrease in long-term debt from December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 was primarily due to the repayment of $119.0 million in subordinated notes and $25.0 million in privately placed notes in the first quarter of 2009. This was
38
partially offset by the recognition of $32.4 million in non-recourse debt on our balance sheet in the second quarter of 2009, which was previously not recognized as an obligation of the Company under leveraged lease accounting treatment. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on this leasing transaction.
Table 13 presents the composition of our securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008.
Table 13
Government Entities
849,755
353,835
434,431
Private Entities
675,000
Total Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
As of September 30, 2009, the increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase from 2008 was primarily due to new placements to accommodate local government entities. A portion of the increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase resulted from the withdrawal of public interest-bearing demand deposits in the second quarter of 2009. As of September 30, 2009, the weighted average maturity was 32 days for our securities sold under agreements to repurchase with government entities and 7.54 years for securities sold under agreements to repurchase with private institutions, subject to the private institutions’ right to terminate agreements at earlier specified dates which could decrease the weighted average maturity to 264 days. As of September 30, 2009, $150.0 million of our securities sold under agreements to repurchase placed with private institutions were indexed to the London Inter Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) with the remaining $525.0 million at fixed interest rates. If the agreements indexed to LIBOR with private institutions are not terminated by specified dates, the interest rates on the agreements become fixed, at rates ranging from 4.25% to 5.00%, for the remaining term of the respective agreements. As of September 30, 2009, the weighted average interest rate for outstanding agreements with private institutions was 3.46%.
As of September 30, 2009, shareholders’ equity was $902.8 million, an increase of $112.1 million or 14% from December 31, 2008, and an increase of $122.8 million or 16% from September 30, 2008. The increase in shareholders’ equity from December 31, 2008 was primarily due to earnings for the first nine months of 2009 of $103.5 million and changes in the fair value of our investment securities available-for-sale, net of tax, of $65.1 million. The change in fair value of our investment securities available-for-sale, net of tax, was primarily due to favorable interest rate movements and the larger investment portfolio as of September 30, 2009. This was partially offset by cash dividends paid of $64.6 million. Consistent with our strategy to build capital levels, we have not repurchased shares of our common stock in 2009. Further discussion on our capital structure is included in the “Corporate Risk Profile — Capital Management” section of MD&A.
39
Analysis of Business Segments
Our business segments are Retail Banking, Commercial Banking, Investment Services, and Treasury. Our management accounting process measures the performance of the business segments based on the management structure of the Company. This process uses various techniques to assign balance sheet and income statement amounts to the business segments, including allocations of income, expense, the Provision, and capital. This process is dynamic and requires certain allocations based on judgment and other subjective factors. Unlike financial accounting, there is no comprehensive, authoritative guidance for management accounting that is equivalent to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). We use this management accounting process to assess business segment performance and to allocate resources.
The net interest income of the business segments reflects the results of a funds transfer pricing process that matches assets and liabilities with similar interest rate sensitivity and maturity characteristics and reflects the allocation of net interest income related to our overall asset and liability management activities on a proportionate basis. The basis for the allocation of net interest income is a function of our assumptions that are subject to change based on changes in current interest rates and market conditions. Funds transfer pricing also serves to transfer interest rate risk to Treasury. However, the other business segments have some latitude to retain certain interest rate exposures related to customer pricing decisions within guidelines. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for selected financial information as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Retail Banking
Retail Banking offers a broad range of financial products and services to consumers and small businesses. Loan and lease products include residential mortgage loans, home equity lines
of credit, automobile loans and leases, and installment loans. Deposit products include checking, savings, and time deposit accounts. Products and services from Retail Banking are delivered to customers through 73 Hawaii branch locations, 485 ATMs throughout Hawaii and the Pacific Islands, e-Bankoh (on-line banking service), a 24-hour customer service center, and a mobile banking service.
Net income decreased by $9.3 million or 41% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to an increase in the Provision and a decrease in net interest income. This was partially offset by an increase in noninterest income. The $8.2 million increase in the Provision was primarily due to higher net charge-offs of loans in the segment’s home equity and residential mortgage portfolios. The $7.5 million decrease in net interest income was primarily due to lower earnings credits on the segment’s deposit portfolio, partially offset by higher average deposit balances. The $0.7 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to higher mortgage banking income, a result of higher origination and sale activity.
Net income decreased by $25.5 million or 36% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in net income was primarily due to an increase in the Provision and noninterest expense, along with a decrease in net interest income. This was partially offset by an increase in noninterest income. The $23.5 million increase in the Provision was primarily due to higher net charge-offs of loans in the segment’s home equity and residential mortgage portfolios. The $19.2 million decrease in net interest income was primarily due to lower earnings credits on the segment’s deposit portfolio, partially offset by higher average deposit balances. The $3.4 million increase in noninterest expense was primarily due to higher FDIC base insurance assessments. The $5.7 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to higher mortgage banking income, a result of higher origination and sale activity.
40
Commercial Banking
Commercial Banking offers products including corporate banking, commercial real estate loans, commercial lease financing, auto dealer financing, deposit and cash management products, merchant services to its small business customers, and wholesale/retail property and casualty insurance products. Commercial lending, deposit, and cash management services are offered to middle-market and large companies in Hawaii. Commercial real estate mortgages focus on customers that include investors, developers, and builders domiciled in Hawaii. Commercial Banking also includes syndicated lending activities, international banking, and operations at our 12 branches in the Pacific Islands.
Net income increased by $6.5 million or 142% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008 primarily due to increases in net interest income and noninterest income. The $6.4 million increase in net interest income was primarily due to higher average deposit balances and the effective settlement of our SILO transactions in 2008. The $1.3 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to higher contingent fee income on our wholesale and casualty property insurance products.
Net income decreased by $3.7 million or 9% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to increases in the Provision and noninterest expense, partially offset by increases in net interest income and noninterest income. The $14.6 million increase in the Provision was primarily due to higher net charge-offs of loans and leases in the segment. The $3.1 million increase in noninterest expense was primarily due to higher FDIC base insurance assessments as well as our share of an industry-wide assessment by the FDIC. The $6.2 million increase in net interest income was primarily due to higher average deposit balances and lower leveraged lease financing income in 2008. The $2.6 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to higher account analysis fees as a result of lower earnings credit rates on customer accounts.
Investment Services
Investment Services includes private banking, trust services, asset management, and institutional investment advisory services. A significant portion of this segment’s income is derived from fees, which are generally based on the market values of assets under management. The private banking and personal trust group assists individuals and families in building and preserving their wealth by providing investment, credit, and trust services to high-net-worth individuals. The asset management group manages portfolios and creates investment products. Institutional sales and service offers investment advice to corporations, government entities, and foundations. This segment also provides a full service brokerage offering equities, mutual funds, life insurance, and annuity products.
Net income decreased by $0.1 million or 5% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to a decrease in noninterest income, partially offset by decreases in noninterest expense and the Provision. The $3.4 million decrease in noninterest income was primarily due to lower fee income as a result of lower asset values under trust administration. The $1.1 million decrease in the Provision was due to lower net charge-offs of loans in this segment. The $1.8 million decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to lower salaries, other operating, and allocated expenses.
Net income decreased by $5.4 million or 56% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to a decrease in noninterest income, partially offset by a decrease in noninterest expense. The $11.7 million decrease in noninterest income was primarily due to lower fee income as a result of lower asset values under trust administration. The $2.7 million decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to lower salaries and allocated expenses.
41
Treasury consists of corporate asset and liability management activities, including interest rate risk management and a foreign exchange business. This segment’s assets and liabilities (and related interest income and expense) consist of interest-bearing deposits, investment securities, federal funds sold and purchased, government deposits, and short and long-term borrowings. The primary sources of noninterest income are from bank-owned life insurance and foreign exchange income related to customer driven currency requests from merchants and island visitors. The net residual effect of the transfer pricing of assets and liabilities is included in this segment, along with eliminations of inter-company transactions.
Net income decreased by $8.0 million or 45% in the third quarter 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to a higher provision for income taxes. This was partially offset by higher net interest income and noninterest income. The $16.0 million increase in the provision for income taxes was primarily due a to the tax benefit from a $12.9 million credit related to the effective settlement of our SILO transactions in the third quarter 2008. The $6.1 million increase in net interest income was primarily due to the increase in the balance of our investment securities portfolio as well as reductions in long-term debt and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. The $1.2 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to the net change in the estimated fair value of our mortgage servicing rights due to changes in valuation assumptions and the fair value of our designated trading securities.
Net income decreased by $14.8 million or 48% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to higher provision for taxes and lower noninterest income. This was partially offset by higher net interest income and lower noninterest expense. The $15.3 million increase in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to the tax benefit from the $12.9 million credit related to our SILO transactions in the third quarter 2008. The $13.3 million decrease in noninterest income was primarily due to a $13.7 million pre-tax gain from the mandatory redemption of our Visa shares in the first quarter of 2008 and unrealized gains from our subordinated notes in the second quarter of 2008. The $6.4 million decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to various accruals recorded in the first quarter of 2008 (e.g., cash awards to purchase our stock and earnings-based incentive compensation) and lower separation expense. The $8.0 million increase in net interest income was primarily due to the increase in the balance of the investment portfolio and reductions in long-term debt and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
Other organizational units (Technology, Operations, Marketing, Human Resources, Finance, Credit and Risk Management, Corporate Services Group, and Corporate and Regulatory Administration) included in Treasury provide a wide-range of support to our other income earning segments. Expenses incurred by these support units are charged to the business segments through an internal cost allocation process.
42
Corporate Risk Profile
Credit Risk
Our overall credit risk position is reflective of the continued weak economic activity during the third quarter of 2009, with increasing levels of non-performing assets compared to December 31, 2008. Although the decline in visitor arrivals appears to be stabilizing, visitor spending continues to be lower in 2009 compared to 2008. The construction and real estate industries in Hawaii remain weak. Hawaii’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate improved slightly from June 30, 2009 to 7.2% as of September 30, 2009. The slow economy in Hawaii is resulting in higher delinquencies and loss rates in our loan and lease portfolio, with the primary impact in our commercial and industrial, construction, and mortgage-related consumer lending portfolios. Table 14 presents several segments of our loan and lease portfolio which demonstrate a higher risk profile.
Residential home building loans represent $85.4 million or 62% of our total commercial construction portfolio balance as of September 30, 2009. Higher risk exposure in our residential home building portfolio was $38.6 million as of September 30, 2009, of which $10.3 million was included in non-performing assets. As of September 30, 2009, $16.5 million of this higher risk exposure relates to residential development projects outside of Oahu. The increase in our higher risk exposure from June 30, 2009 was primarily due to a regional home builder with operations on Oahu who is largely experiencing difficulties in other markets.
Land loans in our residential mortgage portfolio often represents higher risk due to the volatility in the value of the underlying collateral. Our Hawaii residential land loan portfolio was $43.1 million as of September 30, 2009, of which $36.6 million related to properties on Hawaiian islands other than Oahu.
Higher Risk Loans Outstanding
Table 14
Residential Home Building
38,592
22,850
8,536
5,001
6,944
Residential Land Loans
43,128
47,871
50,663
54,483
58,401
Home Equity Loans
24,339
21,832
19,431
14,917
14,028
Air Transportation
60,996
62,148
76,303
79,692
79,758
The higher risk segment within our Hawaii home equity lending portfolio was $24.3 million or 3% of our total home equity loans outstanding as of September 30, 2009. The higher risk segment within our Hawaii home equity portfolio was those loans originated in 2005 or later, with current monitoring credit scores below 600, and with current loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios greater than 70%.
We also continue to have elevated risk in our air transportation portfolio due to a weaker economy in Hawaii and the U.S. Mainland. As of September 30, 2009, included in our commercial leasing portfolio were eight leveraged leases on aircraft that were originated in the 1990’s and prior. Outstanding credit exposure related to these leveraged leases was $52.9 million as of September 30, 2009 and $71.0 million as of December 31, 2008. The decrease in our air transportation credit exposure as of September 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 was primarily due to the sale of our equity interest in a cargo aircraft in the second quarter of 2009.
See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on this transaction. As of September 30, 2009, we also had an $8.1 million exposure related to one direct financing lease for an aircraft, whose intermediary and guarantor has disclosed that it will not receive additional financial support from the U.S. government and that it could file for bankruptcy protection. Relative to our total loan and lease portfolio, domestic air transportation carriers continue to demonstrate a higher risk profile due to fuel costs, pension plan obligations, consumer demand, and marginal pricing power. We believe that volatile fuel costs, coupled with a weak U.S. Mainland economy, will place additional pressure on the financial health of air transportation carriers for the foreseeable future.
These higher risk loans and leases have been considered in our quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the Allowance.
43
Non-Performing Assets
Table 15 presents information on non-performing assets (“NPA”) and accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more.
Non-Performing Assets and Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More
Table 15
Non-Performing Assets 1
Non-Accrual Loans and Leases
9,924
10,511
21,839
3,869
574
1,193
1,219
15,534
6,548
956
910
133
149
27,341
19,234
27,750
9,003
723
16,718
16,265
9,230
3,904
3,749
3,726
2,567
1,620
1,614
1,162
550
1,383
20,994
19,382
12,233
4,911
Total Non-Accrual Loans and Leases
48,335
38,616
39,983
14,521
5,634
438
346
Total Non-Performing Assets
39,054
40,329
Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More
137
6,785
3,005
257
268
3,142
7,053
5,951
4,657
4,794
4,192
3,455
1,698
2,879
1,720
1,077
296
749
769
776
743
758
739
1,270
1,100
1,134
926
9,137
9,575
8,390
7,146
5,435
Total Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More
12,279
8,647
14,199
Restructured Loans Not Included in Non-Accrual Loans and Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More
7,578
2,307
Ratio of Non-Accrual Loans and Leases toTotal Loans and Leases
0.81
0.22
0.09
Ratio of Non-Performing Assets toTotal Loans and Leases and Foreclosed Real Estate
0.64
0.23
Ratio of Commercial Non-Performing Assets toTotal Commercial Loans and Leases
1.23
0.83
0.37
0.03
Ratio of Consumer Non-Performing Assets toTotal Consumer Loans and Leases and Foreclosed Real Estate
0.57
0.52
0.31
0.14
0.13
Ratio of Non-Performing Assets and Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More to Total Loans and Leases and Foreclosed Real Estate
1.03
0.79
0.17
Quarter to Quarter Changes in Non-Performing Assets 1
Balance at Beginning of Quarter
6,680
Additions
22,856
22,459
29,164
15,464
1,355
Reductions
Payments
(6,899
(15,593
(874
(2,440
(955
Return to Accrual Status
(3,373
(230
(768
(1,468
(756
Sales of Foreclosed Real Estate
(237
(82
Charge-offs/Write-downs
(2,865
(7,911
(2,060
(2,534
(397
Total Reductions
(13,374
(23,734
(3,784
(6,442
(2,108
Balance at End of Quarter
Excluded from non-performing assets are non-accrual loans held for sale of $7.7 million and $5.2 million as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.
44
NPAs are comprised of non-accrual loans and leases and foreclosed real estate. The $33.6 million increase in NPAs from December 31, 2008 was primarily due to net additions to non-accrual status of $12.8 million in residential mortgage loans, $10.5 million in construction loans, and $6.1 million in commercial and industrial loans.
The increase in non-accrual residential mortgage loans from December 31, 2008 was primarily due to a $6.2 million increase in non-accrual land loans and second home and investment properties on Hawaiian Islands other than Oahu. Also contributing to this increase was a $4.2 million increase in non-accrual owner-occupied properties on Hawaiian Islands other than Oahu. Non-accrual residential mortgage loans on Oahu increased by $2.2 million from December 31, 2008. As of September 30, 2009, there were 84 properties on non-accrual status, compared to 32 properties on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2008.
The increase in non-accrual construction loans during the third quarter of 2009 was primarily due to the addition to non-accrual status of two loans totaling $10.5 million. Non-accrual loan exposure in our construction loan portfolio was comprised of four construction loans, with the largest exposure being $6.8 million. We have evaluated each of these loans for impairment and have taken partial charge-offs on three of these loans. The fourth loan is deemed to be well-secured, with a 12% LTV ratio, as it represents the senior tranche in a structured loan with a high level of subordination.
Included in NPAs are loans that we consider impaired. Impaired loans are defined as those which we believe it is probable we will not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, as well as those loans whose terms have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). Impaired loans were $32.4 million as of September 30, 2009 and $8.3 million as of December 31,
2008. There were no impaired loans as of September 30, 2008. Impaired loans had a related Allowance of $4.1 million as of September 30, 2009 and less than $0.1 million as of December 31, 2008.
We had loans whose terms had been modified in a TDR of $8.4 million as of September 30, 2009. Loans modified in a TDR were primarily the result of the modification of interest rates to below market rates and extensions of maturity dates.
Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More and Still Accruing Interest
Loans and leases in this category are 90 days or more past due, as to principal or interest, and still accruing interest because they are well secured and in the process of collection. The $1.9 million or 14% decrease in loans and leases past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest from December 31, 2008 was primarily due to the payoff of two commercial and industrial loans during the first quarter of 2009. This was partially offset by the addition of one construction loan to this classification in the third quarter of 2009.
The $6.8 million increase in loans and leases past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest from September 30, 2008 reflects increased delinquency activity in our consumer loans, consistent with the weak economy in Hawaii, primarily in the portfolios that are affected by residential real estate. As noted previously, there was an addition of one construction loan to this classification which also contributed to the increase in loans and leases past due 90 days or more from September 30, 2008. This loan has a LTV ratio of 33% and is currently in the process of collection.
45
Reserve for Credit Losses
Table 16 presents the activity in our reserve for credit losses.
Table 16
Balance at Beginning of Period
142,835
107,667
128,667
96,167
Loans and Leases Charged-Off
(4,769
(1,783
(23,493
(4,568
(2,092
(5,845
(120
(27
(4,613
(303
(2,430
(398
(5,071
(531
(3,614
(519
(9,233
(1,798
(2,602
(2,858
(7,694
(7,960
(3,032
(3,444
(10,252
(8,202
Total Loans and Leases Charged-Off
(24,504
(9,029
(68,293
(23,362
Recoveries on Loans and Leases Previously Charged-Off
220
1,022
1,407
49
81
448
67
719
162
239
83
849
699
2,311
581
647
2,004
2,051
Total Recoveries on Loans and Leases Previously Charged-Off
2,246
6,376
5,905
Net Loans and Leases Charged-Off
(22,258
(7,358
(61,917
(17,457
Provision for Unfunded Commitments
Balance at End of Period 2
148,077
120,667
Components
Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
5,419
5,169
Total Reserve for Credit Losses
Average Loans and Leases Outstanding
Ratio of Net Loans and Leases Charged-Off toAverage Loans and Leases Outstanding (annualized)
1.46
1.33
0.36
Ratio of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses toLoans and Leases Outstanding
Included in this analysis is activity related to the Company’s reserve for unfunded commitments, which is separately recorded in other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.
We maintain a Reserve that consists of two components, the Allowance and a Reserve for Unfunded Commitments (“Unfunded Reserve”). The Reserve provides for the risk of credit losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio and is based on loss estimates derived from a comprehensive quarterly evaluation. The evaluation reflects analyses of individual
borrowers and historical loss experience, supplemented as necessary by credit judgment that considers observable trends, conditions, and other relevant environmental and economic factors.
The level of the Allowance is adjusted by recording an expense or recovery through the Provision. The level of the
Unfunded Reserve is adjusted by recording an expense or recovery in other noninterest expense. The Provision exceeded net charge-offs of loans and leases for the third quarter of 2009 by $5.2 million and by $19.2 million for the first nine months of 2009.
Commercial and industrial net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2009 included a $1.8 million partial charge-off related to the sale of our interest in a syndicated credit of $8.8 million.
Commercial mortgage charge-offs of $2.1 million in the third quarter of 2009 related to a partial charge-off resulting from the sale of our interest in a syndicated credit which was in the process of closing as of September 30, 2009. As a result, our interest in this syndicated credit was recorded in loans held for sale as of September 30, 2009 at its estimated fair value of $7.7 million.
Construction charge-offs of $5.8 million in the third quarter of 2009 included partial charge-offs related to three projects. These borrowers were adversely affected by weakness in the residential real estate market and the economy in Hawaii.
Charge-off activity in our consumer portfolios in the third quarter of 2009 was consistent with the slow economy in Hawaii. Although we remain focused on loss mitigation strategies, consumers continue to be adversely impacted by higher levels of unemployment, lower real estate values, and weakness in the economy in Hawaii.
As of September 30, 2009, the Allowance was $142.7 million or 2.41% of total loans and leases outstanding. This represents an increase of 52 basis points from December 31, 2008 and an increase of 64 basis points from September 30, 2008. The increase in the Allowance during the third quarter of 2009 was primarily due to increased risk in our mortgage-related consumer lending portfolios, a result of the weak economy in Hawaii.
Although we determine the amount of each component of the Allowance separately, the Allowance as a whole was considered appropriate by management as of September 30, 2009, based on our ongoing analysis of estimated probable credit losses, credit risk profiles, economic conditions, coverage ratios, and other relevant factors.
The Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
We increased the Unfunded Reserve by $0.3 million from December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008. The process used to determine the Unfunded Reserve is consistent with the process for determining the Allowance, as adjusted for estimated funding probabilities or loan and lease equivalency factors.
Market Risk
Market risk is the potential of loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates and prices. We are exposed to market risk as a consequence of the normal course of conducting our business activities. Our market risk management process involves measuring, monitoring, controlling, and managing risks that can significantly impact our statements of income and condition. In this management process, market risks are balanced with expected returns in an effort to enhance earnings performance, while limiting volatility. The activities associated with these market risks are categorized into “trading” and “other than trading.”
Our trading activities include foreign currency and foreign exchange contracts that expose us to a small degree of foreign currency risk. These transactions are primarily executed on behalf of customers. Our other than trading activities include normal business transactions that expose our balance sheet profile to varying degrees of market risk.
Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk.
Interest Rate Risk
The objective of our interest rate risk management process is to maximize net interest income while operating within acceptable limits established for interest rate risk and maintaining adequate levels of funding and liquidity.
The potential cash flows, sales, or replacement value of many of our assets and liabilities, especially those that earn or pay interest, are sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates. This interest rate risk arises primarily from our normal
47
business activities of gathering deposits and extending loans. Many factors affect our exposure to changes in interest rates, such as general economic and financial conditions, customer preferences, historical pricing relationships, and repricing characteristics of financial instruments.
Our earnings are affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and its agencies, particularly the FRB. The monetary policies of the FRB influence, to a significant extent, the overall growth of loans, investment securities, and deposits and the level of interest rates earned on assets and paid for liabilities. The nature and impact of future changes in monetary policies are generally not predictable.
In managing interest rate risk, we, through the Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”), measure short and long-term sensitivities to changes in interest rates. The ALCO utilizes several techniques to manage interest rate risk, which include:
· adjusting balance sheet mix or altering the interest rate characteristics of assets and liabilities;
· changing product pricing strategies;
· modifying characteristics of the investment securities portfolio; or
· using derivative financial instruments.
The use of derivative financial instruments has generally been limited. This is due to natural on-balance sheet hedges arising out of offsetting interest rate exposures from loans and investment securities with deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities. In particular, the investment securities portfolio is utilized to manage the interest rate exposure and sensitivity to within the guidelines and limits established by ALCO. Natural and offsetting hedges reduce the need to employ off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk exposures. Expected movements in interest rates are also
considered in managing interest rate risk. Thus, as interest rates change, we may use different techniques to manage interest rate risk.
A key element in our ongoing process to measure and monitor interest rate risk is the utilization of an asset/liability simulation model. The model is used to estimate and measure the balance sheet sensitivity to changes in interest rates. These estimates are based on assumptions on the behavior of loan and deposit pricing, repayment rates on mortgage-based assets, and principal amortization and maturities on other financial instruments. The model’s analytics include the effects of standard prepayment options on mortgages and customer withdrawal options for deposits. While such assumptions are inherently uncertain, we believe that these assumptions are reasonable. As a result, the simulation model attempts to capture the dynamic nature of the balance sheet.
We utilize net interest income simulations to analyze short-term income sensitivities to changes in interest rates. Table 17 presents, as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, an estimate of the change in net interest income during a quarterly time frame that would result from a gradual change in interest rates, moving in a parallel fashion over the entire yield curve, over the next 12-month period, relative to the measured base case scenario. The base case scenario assumes the balance sheet and interest rates are generally unchanged. Based on the net interest income simulation as of September 30, 2009, net interest income sensitivity to changes in interest rates as of September 30, 2009 was slightly more sensitive compared to the sensitivity profiles as of September 30, 2008. Economic conditions and government intervention have caused interest rates to fall to low levels and introduced significant market volatility. These factors have contributed to greater interest rate risk to the Company as of September 30, 2009.
48
Net Interest Income Sensitivity Profile
Table 17
Impact on Future Quarterly Net Interest Income
Change in Interest Rates (basis points)
+200
(723
)%
(627
+100
(206
(104
(0.1
-100
(1,135
(940
(0.9
-200
(2,477
(2,090
To analyze the impact of changes in interest rates in a more realistic manner, non-parallel interest rate scenarios are also simulated. These non-parallel interest rate scenarios indicate that net interest income may decrease from the base case scenario should the yield curve flatten or become inverted for a period of time. Conversely, if the yield curve should steepen further from its mostly “normal” profile, net interest income may increase. We also use the Market Value of Portfolio Equity (“MVPE”) sensitivity analysis to estimate the net present value change in our net assets (i.e., assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet instruments) from changes in interest rates. The MVPE was approximately $2.0 billion as of
September 30, 2009 and approximately $1.6 billion as of September 30, 2008. Table 18 presents, as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, an estimate of the change in the MVPE that would occur from an instantaneous 100 and 200 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates, moving in a parallel fashion over the entire yield curve. The MVPE sensitivity generally decreased as of September 30, 2009 compared to September 30, 2008 as a result of changes in the balance sheet, particularly from higher deposit balances. A further significant parallel decline in interest rates effectively creates a 0% interest rate environment which greatly reduces the estimated value of both our loans and deposits.
Market Value of Equity Sensitivity Profile
Table 18
Change in Market Value of Equity
(45,976
(2.3
(196,695
(12.5
13,149
(83,651
(30,625
(1.6
(5,721
(121,051
(130,480
Further enhancing the MVPE sensitivity analysis are:
· value-at-risk metrics;
· key rate analysis;
· duration of equity analysis; and
· exposure to basis risk and non-parallel yield curve shifts.
There are inherent limitations to these measures; however, used along with the MVPE sensitivity analysis, we obtain better overall insight for managing our exposures to changes in interest rates. Based on the additional analyses, we estimate that our greatest exposure is in scenarios where interest rates fall significantly from current levels.
Liquidity Management
Liquidity is managed in an effort to provide continuous access to sufficient, reasonably priced funds. Funding requirements are impacted by loan originations and refinancings, liability issuances and settlements, and off-balance sheet funding commitments. We consider and comply with various regulatory guidelines regarding required liquidity levels and periodically monitor our liquidity position in light of the changing economic environment and customer activity. Based on periodic liquidity assessments, we may alter our asset,
liability, and off-balance sheet positions. The ALCO monitors sources and uses of funds and modifies asset and liability positions as liquidity requirements change. This process, combined with our ability to raise funds in money and capital markets and through private placements, provides flexibility in managing the exposure to liquidity risk.
In an effort to satisfy our liquidity needs, we actively manage our assets and liabilities. The potential sources of short-term liquidity include interest-bearing deposits as well as the ability to sell certain assets including investment securities available-for-sale. Assets generate long-term liquidity through cash flows from investment securities and loans. With respect to liabilities, short-term liquidity is generated from securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term funding sources such as federal funds while long-term liquidity is generated through growth in deposits and long-term debt.
We strengthened our liquidity position in the third quarter of 2009, with increased levels of funding. Total deposits were $9.3 billion as of September 30, 2009, a $958.0 million or 12% increase from December 31, 2008, and a $1.6 billion or 21% increase from September 30, 2008. In 2009, we made investments in debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and in mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies. These investments in high grade securities with relatively short durations, allows us to maintain flexibility to redeploy funds should such opportunities arise.
Capital Management
The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can cause certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the
Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative and qualitative measures. These measures were established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy. As of September 30, 2009, the Company and the Bank were “well capitalized” under this regulatory framework. There have been no conditions or events since September 30, 2009 that management believes have changed either the Company’s or the Bank’s capital classifications.
As of September 30, 2009, our shareholders’ equity was $902.8 million, a $112.1 million or 14% increase from December 31, 2008, and a $122.8 million or 16% increase from September 30, 2008.
In response to a slowing economy and economic uncertainty, we began in the second half of 2008 to increase capital. As of September 30, 2009, our Tier 1 capital ratio was 13.43%, our total capital ratio was 14.70%, our leverage ratio was 6.67%, and our ratio of tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets was 14.56%.
From the beginning of our share repurchase program in July 2001 through October 28, 2008, we repurchased a total of 45.6 million shares of common stock and returned $1.6 billion to our shareholders at an average cost of $35.44 per share. We have not repurchased shares of our common stock since October 2008, except for purchases from our employees in connection with income tax withholdings related to the vesting of restricted stock and shares purchased for our Rabbi Trust. Total share repurchase authority under our share repurchase program was $1.70 billion as of October 21, 2009. Remaining buyback authority under our share repurchase program was $85.4 million as of October 21, 2009.
In October 2009, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.45 per share on our outstanding shares. The dividend will be payable on December 14, 2009 to our shareholders of record at the close of business on November 30, 2009.
Table 19 presents our regulatory capital and ratios as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008.
Regulatory Capital and Ratios
Table 19
Regulatory Capital
Less:
Cumulative Change in Fair Value of Financial LiabilitiesAccounted for Under the Fair Value Option
(2,565
(683
(1,428
Postretirement Benefit Liability Adjustments
6,748
7,079
8,274
Unrealized Valuation and Other Adjustments
60,845
(4,276
(15,086
2,544
2,106
2,771
Tier 1 Capital
800,268
751,519
750,530
Allowable Reserve for Credit Losses
75,393
84,163
84,663
Total Regulatory Capital
875,661
835,682
835,193
Risk-Weighted Assets
5,958,763
6,688,530
6,737,044
Key Regulatory Capital Ratios
The revisions to our Regulatory Capital Ratios as of September 30, 2008 did not change our well capitalized position as defined in the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Credit Commitments, and Contractual Obligations
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not participate in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as variable-
interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations have not changed materially since previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Credit Commitments
Table 20 presents our credit commitments as of September 30, 2009.
Table 20
Less Than
After 5
One Year
1-3 Years
4-5 Years
Years
Unfunded Commitments to Extend Credit
548,672
377,362
63,390
1,073,991
2,063,415
Standby Letters of Credit
82,164
3,363
85,527
Commercial Letters of Credit
24,677
Total Credit Commitments
655,513
380,725
2,173,619
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
See the “Market Risk” section of MD&A.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of September 30, 2009. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009. There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the third quarter of 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part 1, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The Parent’s repurchases of equity securities for the third quarter of 2009 were as follows:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Total Number of Shares
Approximate Dollar Value
Purchased as Part of
of Shares that May Yet Be
Total Number of
Average Price
Publicly Announced Plans
Purchased Under the
Period
Shares Purchased 1
Paid Per Share
or Programs
Plans or Programs 2
July 1 – 31, 2009
39.29
85,356,214
August 1 – 31, 2009
86
34.74
September 1 – 30, 2009
72
41.35
805
38.99
The shares purchased in the third quarter of 2009 were shares purchased for our Rabbi Trust. These shares were not purchased as part of the publicly announced program. The shares were purchased at the closing price of the Parent’s common stock on the dates of purchase.
The share repurchase program was first announced in July 2001. As of September 30, 2009, $85.4 million remained of the total $1.70 billion total repurchase amount authorized by the Parent’s Board of Directors under the share repurchase program. The program has no set expiration or termination date.
Item 6. Exhibits
A list of exhibits to this Form 10-Q is set forth on the Exhibit Index and is incorporated herein by reference.
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: October 26, 2009
By:
/s/ Allan R. Landon
Allan R. Landon
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Kent T. Lucien
Kent T. Lucien
Chief Financial Officer
53
Exhibit Index
Exhibit Number
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002