UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______ to _______
Commission File Number 1-11414
BANCO LATINOAMERICANO DE EXPORTACIONES, S.A.(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Calle 50 y Aquilino de la GuardiaApartado 6-1497El Dorado, Panama CityRepublic of Panama507-210-8500(Address and telephone number of Registrants principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Registrant has elected to follow.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BANCO LATINOAMERICANO DE EXPORTACIONES, S.A.
In this Annual Report on Form 20-F (this Annual Report), all references to the Bank or BLADEX are to Banco Latinoamericano de Exportaciones, S.A., a specialized multinational bank incorporated under the laws of Panama on November 30, 1977, and its subsidiaries.
The Bank will provide without charge to each person to whom this Annual Report is delivered, upon the written or oral request of such person, a copy of any or all of the documents incorporated herein by reference (other than exhibits, unless such exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference in such documents). Written requests for such copies should be directed to the attention of Carlos Yap, Vice President Finance and Performance Management, BLADEX, as follows: (i) if by regular mail, to Apartado 6-1497, El Dorado, Panama City, Republic of Panama, and (ii) if by courier service, to Calle 50 y Aquilino de la Guardia, Panama City, Republic of Panama. Telephone requests may be directed to Mr. Yap at 011-507-210-8581. Written requests may also be faxed to Mr. Yap at 011-507-269-6333 or sent via e-mail to cyap@blx.com. Information is also available on the Banks website at: www.blx.com.
All references to dollars or $ are to United States dollars. The numbers and percentages set out in this Annual Report have been rounded and, accordingly, may not total exactly.
2
The Bank accepts deposits and raises funds principally in United States dollars, grants loans mostly in United States dollars and publishes its consolidated financial statements in United States dollars.
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements of expected future developments. The Bank wishes to ensure that such statements are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements pursuant to the safe harbor established in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report refer to the possibility that the Bank will need to renegotiate and restructure or write-off certain of its Argentine loans, the adequacy of the Banks allowance for credit losses to address the likely impact of the Argentine crisis on the Banks loan portfolio, the Banks ability to execute a planned recapitalization, the availability of future sources of funding for the Banks lending operations, the adequacy of the Banks sources of liquidity to cover large deposit withdrawals and the impact of the crisis in Argentina and developments in other countries in Latin America on the Banks results of operations and financial condition. These forward-looking statements reflect the expectations of the Banks management and are based on currently available data; however, actual experience with respect to these factors is subject to future events and uncertainties which could materially impact the Banks expectations. Among the factors that can cause actual performance and results to differ materially are as follows: a decline in the willingness of international lenders and depositors to provide funding to the Bank, adverse economic or political developments in the Region, particularly in Argentina or Brazil, which could increase the level of impaired loans in the Banks loan portfolio and, if sufficiently severe, result in the Banks allowance for probable credit losses being insufficient to cover losses in the portfolio, an unwillingness on the part of the Banks existing shareholders or other investors to invest additional equity capital in the Bank, unanticipated developments with respect to international banking transactions, a change in the Banks credit ratings, events in Argentina, Brazil or other countries in the Region unfolding in a manner that is detrimental to the Bank or which result in adequate liquidity being unavailable to the Bank.
3
PART I
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers
Not required in this Annual Report.
Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable
Item 3. Key Information
Selected Financial Data
The following table presents consolidated selected financial data for the Bank. The financial data presented below are at December 31, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001 for the years then ended and are derived from the Banks consolidated financial statements for the years indicated, which were audited by KPMG Peat Marwick. The Consolidated Financial Statements (the Consolidated Financial Statements) for the Bank for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 are included in this Annual Report, together with the report of KPMG Peat Marwick thereon. The information below is qualified in its entirety by the detailed information, both financial and otherwise, included elsewhere herein and should be read in conjunction with Information on the Company, Operating and Financial Review and Prospects and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in this Annual Report.
Consolidated Selected Financial Information
4
5
Common Stockholders Equity
At December 31, 2001, the Banks total common stockholders equity was $598.4 million compared to $699.2 million at December 31, 2000 and $680.4 million at December 31, 1999, representing 10.1%, 12.4% and 13.2%, respectively, of the Banks total assets.
The following table presents information concerning the Banks capital position at the dates indicated below.
Capital reserves are established by the Bank from retained earnings and are a form of retained earnings according to Panamanian banking regulations. The objective of capital reserves is to strengthen the capital position of the Bank, as reductions of these reserves require the approval of the Board of Directors of the Bank (the Board of Directors) and Panamanian banking authorities.
The increase in common stockholders equity in 2000 was due primarily to an increase in retained earnings. The decrease in common stockholders equity in 2001 was due primarily to the stock repurchase program and an increased dividend payout ratio approved by the Board of Directors in December 2000. On February 5, 2002, the Board of Directors suspended dividends on common shares believing that it was in the best interest of the shareholders to conserve the Banks capital resources until there was more clarity regarding the Banks exposure in Argentina.
In July 1998, the Board of Directors approved a program under which the Bank would offer to repurchase up to 200,000 of its Class B shares of common stock at a price per share not to exceed 90% of the market value of the Banks Class E shares of common stock (as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of purchase). The first and second repurchase offers were completed for 100,000 shares each in December 1998 at a price of $14.50 per share for a total amount of $1.5 million and in March 1999 at a price of $16.00 per share for a total amount of $1.6 million, respectively. Upon repurchase, these Class B shares were cancelled by the Bank.
In October 1999, the Board of Directors approved a program in which the Bank would offer to repurchase up to 400,000 of its Class B shares at a price per share not to exceed 90% of the market price of the Class E shares (as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of purchase) or the average per share book value of all
6
shares of the Banks common stock. The first and only repurchase offer under this program was made for 200,000 shares on November 12, 1999 and was completed at a price of $17.70 per Class B share for a total amount of $3.5 million. Upon repurchase, these Class B shares were cancelled by the Bank.
During the year 2000, the Board of Directors approved repurchases by the Bank, at the discretion of management, of up to 2,000,000 Class B shares (at the prevailing per share market price of the Class E shares on the date of purchase) from shareholders that requested conversion of their Class B shares into Class E shares. The Bank repurchased an aggregate of 568,010 Class B shares for $15.7 million under this program prior to its cancellation in December 2000. Upon repurchase, these Class B shares were not cancelled by the Bank and were, accordingly, classified as treasury stock.
In December 2000, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program, an increased dividend payout ratio and a plan to declare and pay dividends on a quarterly basis, rather than annually. Under the repurchase program, the Bank may, from time to time, at the discretion of management, purchase up to an aggregate of $75,000,000 of Class E shares on the open market at the then prevailing market price. The Bank may also make one or more repurchases of up to an aggregate of $25,000,000 of Class A shares of common stock in privately negotiated transactions at the then prevailing market price of the Class E shares. Any repurchases of Class A shares from a Class A shareholder may not exceed 25% of the number of Class A shares owned by such Class A shareholder. On November 8, 2001, the Board of Directors halted the Banks share repurchase program, believing that it is in the best interests of shareholders to conserve the Banks capital resources until the probable outcome of the Banks exposure to Argentina is more clear (see Risk Factors Regional Economic Conditions). During the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, the Bank repurchased the following shares under this program:
The Banks policy with respect to its capital position is to maintain a minimum capital ratio of total common stockholders equity to total assets of 7%. At December 31, 2001, this ratio was 10%. In addition, the Bank has established an internal policy of maintaining minimum Tier 1 and total capital to risk weighted asset ratios of 10% and 12.5%, respectively, as defined by the United States Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve Board) and BIS capital adequacy requirements, although the Bank is not subject to these risk weighted capital requirements. However, if the Federal Reserve Boards fully phased in risk-based capital guidelines had been applicable to the Bank, management believes that as of December 31, 2001 the Bank would have exceeded all applicable capital adequacy requirements. At December 31, 2001, the Banks Tier 1 and total capital ratios calculated according to these guidelines were 15.7% and 17.4%, respectively. The Banking Law (as defined under Information on the Company Business Overview Regulation) in Panama, which became effective on June 12, 1998, requires the Bank to maintain minimum total capital to risk weighted asset ratios of 8% (each, as defined in the Banking Law). At December 31, 2001, the Banks total capital to risk weighted asset ratio, calculated according to the guidelines of the Banking Law, was 13.8%. See Information on the Company Business Overview Regulation Panamanian Law.
As described under Risk Factors Regional Economic Conditions, the Bank has determined to increase its allowance for credit losses (which includes allowances for the Banks entire credit portfolio) and impairment losses on securities as of June 30, 2002 to approximately $510 million, of which approximately $420 million will relate to its Argentine portfolio. At June 21, 2002, the Banks total exposure to Argentina was $920 million (net of impairment losses on securities of $40 million taken in 2001).
7
It is anticipated that the resulting charge against earnings and loss will have the effect of reducing the Banks earnings for the second quarter of 2002 by approximately $295 million. At March 31, 2002, the Banks allowance for credit losses amounted to $215 million. The exact amount of this increase, and the corresponding charge against earnings, will be determined prior to and announced in connection with the release of the Banks second quarter results scheduled for late July or early August 2002. The Bank is formulating a comprehensive strategy to address its ongoing capital and funding needs, including a plan to recapitalize the Bank with additional equity capital.
Risk Factors
Regional Economic Conditions
All of the Banks lending activities are conducted with borrowers in Latin America and the Caribbean (the Region). At various times in the past, and particularly during the 1980s, many of the countries in the Region have experienced severe economic difficulties, including periods of slow or negative growth, large government budget deficits, high inflation, currency devaluation and unavailability of foreign exchange, including dollars. As a result, many governments and public and private institutions in the Region were unable to make interest and principal payments on their external debt. Much of the external debt of the Region was restructured to provide for extensions of repayment schedules, grace periods during which payments of principal were suspended and, in certain cases, reduced rates of interest.
These difficulties have arisen again, particularly in Argentina where an economic crisis has resulted in a default on the countrys external debt. The Argentine crisis has had a significant adverse effect on the Banks financial condition and results of operations, and there is no assurance that future developments in the political and economic situation of the countries in the Region, over which the Bank has no control, will not further adversely affect market conditions for the Banks funding or securities, or its business, financial condition, results of operation or prospects.
During 2001, the U.S economy suffered a recession, and was further adversely affected by the attack on New Yorks World Trade Center. This had a significant adverse economic effect on the economies of the Latin American countries in which the Bank conducts its lending activities.
Argentina. A prolonged deterioration in Argentinas economic and political environment, financial condition and investor confidence, resulted in late December 2001 in a profound crisis which forced the Argentine government to adopt stringent measures, including foreign exchange and deposit controls, bank holidays, and restrictions on the repayment of foreign debt. Given the lack of a clearly defined and comprehensive fiscal, monetary and banking policy framework and the continuing volatility of Argentinas political and financial situation, there is great uncertainty as to how or when the situation will be resolved.
The Banks exposure to Argentina amounted to $1.1 billion at December 31, 2001, including loans of $804 million, $80 million of securities (net of impairment losses of $40.4 million) and $234 million of off-balance sheet financial risk instruments. This exposure represents a reduction of 27% from December 31, 2000, and is distributed among the countrys top tier local banks (12%), local corporations (14%), state-owned banks (24%), multinational corporations (23%), and international banks (27%, of which 70% represents subsidiaries and 30% represents branches). In addition, the Bank at December 31, 2001 had $292 million of exposure under repurchase agreements with counterparties in Argentina, which were fully secured with U.S. Treasury securities. The Bank does not hold Argentine sovereign debt and 49% of the Banks exposure in Argentina at December 31, 2001 was considered trade-related transactions.
The deterioration of the Argentine economy, reflecting four years of economic recession, and the current crises, have adversely affected the financial condition of the Banks Argentine obligors, including banks and corporations, and the quality of the Banks loans to those obligors. In response, the Bank has put in place a pragmatic collection program to manage its Argentine exposure. The Banks multilateral status, confirmed by the Central Bank of Argentina at the end of February 2002, exempts the Bank from limitations on the convertibility
8
and transfer abroad of U.S. dollars for payment of external obligations, thereby contributing to the on-going efforts of this program.
As a result, the Banks exposure to Argentina at June 21, 2002 amounted to approximately $920 million, which represented a reduction of $198 million from December 31, 2001 and a reduction of $40 million from March 31, 2002. All of the Banks exposure in Argentina continues to be denominated in U.S. dollars (with a small portion in Japanese yen) as none of the Banks loans in Argentina have been converted to an Argentine peso basis. During the year 2002, the Bank collected interest from Argentine borrowers of approximately $27 million while interest in the amount of $2.7 million on non-accruing and accruing assets remained unpaid at June 21, 2002. The Bank intends to place all loans and investments in Argentina on non-accrual status at June 30, 2002. Fees generated by contingencies in Argentina will also be accounted for on a cash basis.
Even with the benefit of the Banks confirmed multilateral status, given the continued severity of the Argentine crises, the Bank believes that it will have to renegotiate and restructure loans, and that it will also face write-offs in its Argentine portfolio. In the absence of any clarity as to the timing or nature of the ways in which the many issues facing the country will be resolved, the Banks management and Board of Directors have determined to take a conservative position relative to the Banks credit portfolio in Argentina.
At December 31, 2001, the Bank had a total allowance for credit losses (including loans and contingencies) of $195 million, reflecting additional provisions taken in 2001 of $77 million. In addition, the Bank charged $40 million to earnings in 2001 for impairment losses on securities from Argentina.
After careful consideration, and based upon rigorous analysis of all the relevant factors, the Banks Board of Directors has determined to further increase the allowance for credit losses and impairment losses on securities to approximately $510 million, of which approximately $420 million will relate to its Argentine portfolio. The exact amount of this increase, and the corresponding charge against earnings, will be determined prior to and announced in connection with the release of the Banks second quarter results scheduled for late July or early August 2002.
As part of this decision, the Bank is formulating a comprehensive strategy, with the assistance of financial advisors, designed to address the Banks capital and funding needs following the contemplated increase of the credit loss allowance for Argentina. This strategy will include a plan to recapitalize the Bank with additional equity capital. The Bank has retained BNP Paribas Securities Corp. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. as financial advisors to assist with this process. The Bank and its advisors are coordinating with the Banks credit rating agencies, multilateral organizations and public sector shareholders in formulating this recapitalization plan.
The Bank believes that these steps will adequately address the likely impact of the Argentine situation on the Banks loan portfolio and that the Bank will remain in a strong financial position. There can be no assurance, however, that the Bank will be successful in executing any recapitalization plan or that the political and economic situation in Argentina or any other major country, will not deteriorate further and require additional action.
The Bank will continue to monitor developments in Argentina closely and take the appropriate additional steps as more information and clarity on the Argentine governments actions regarding external debt and their effect on the Bank become available.
Brazil. Investors have recently become increasingly uneasy about Brazil due to, among other factors, a reduction in flows of direct foreign investments and an increasingly uncertain political environment in light of the upcoming 2002 presidential elections. This has resulted in the rapid decline in the value of Brazils currency compared to the U.S. dollar and speculation about the ability of Brazil to service its approximately $290 billion of public debt, much of which must be refinanced in the next several years.
The Bank is proactively managing its exposure in Brazil in line with its conservative credit risk and portfolio management strategy. The Banks exposure to Brazil amounted to $2,461 million at December 31, 2001
9
and at June 21, 2002 had decreased to approximately $1,671 million. At the present time, all of the Banks loans to Brazilian borrowers are current and there are no past due amounts of interest or principal.
Adequacy of Allowances for Credit Losses
As indicated above, the Bank has determined to increase its allowance for credit losses and impairment losses on securities to approximately $510 million, of which approximately $420 million will relate to its Argentine portfolio. At June 21, 2002, the Banks total exposure to Argentina was $920 million (net of impairment losses on securities of $40 million taken in 2001). Management will continue to maintain the allowance for credit losses at a level, which reflects the potential for political and economic instability in countries in the Region and economic cycles. The determination of the appropriate level of allowances for credit losses necessarily requires managements judgment, including assumptions and estimates made in the context of rapidly changing political and economic conditions in many of the countries in the Region. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Banks current level of reserves will prove to be adequate in light of current and future events.
Funding Issues Resulting from the Argentine Situation
During the first quarter of 2002, the major rating agencies downgraded the Banks credit ratings due to the crisis in Argentina and its potential impact on the Banks credit exposure in that country. As of the date hereof, the Bank has long-term debt ratings of Baa3 from Moodys Investors Services, Inc. (Moodys), BBB- from Standard & Poors Ratings Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (Standard & Poors) and BBB- from Fitch IBCA, Inc. (Fitch) and short-term debt ratings of Prime 3, A-3 and F-3 from Moodys, Standard & Poors and Fitch, respectively. The Baa3 rating from Moodys and the BBB- rating from Standard & Poors and Fitch are investment grade ratings. The Bank follows a conservative liquidity management strategy and in view of the volatility in the Region began gradually increasing its net cash position in the second quarter of 2001, reaching a level of approximately $600 million in January 2002, which has been maintained since that time. At May 31, 2002, liquidity levels amounted to $592 million compared to $314 million at December 31, 2000. At May 31, 2002, the Banks net cash position represented almost 80% of total deposits. There is no assurance that a further deterioration of the Argentine situation or difficulties in other countries in the Region where the Bank has large exposures will not trigger further downgrades in the Banks credit ratings below investment grade ratings, which would adversely affect the Banks cost of funds, its deposit base and accessibility to the debt capital markets.
Concentration of Lending and Funding Activities
At December 31, 2001, approximately 81% in principal amount of the Banks total credits were outstanding to borrowers in five countries: Brazil (39%), Argentina (18%), Mexico (17%), Venezuela (4%), and the Dominican Republic (3%). In addition, at December 31, 2001, 24% of the Banks total loans were to seven borrowers in Brazil and 9% of the Banks total loans were to three borrowers in Mexico. A significant deterioration (or further deterioration) of economic conditions in any of the countries listed above or of the financial condition of any of these borrowers could adversely affect the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank.
One of the Banks sources of funding for its short-term loans is interbank deposits received principally from central banks in the Region. Historically, these deposits have represented approximately 35% of total liabilities. If any of these central banks were to withdraw a substantial portion of its deposits with the Bank, the Banks liquidity could be adversely affected, although the Bank believes that it has adequate sources of liquidity to cover any such withdrawals. During the first five months of 2002, deposits declined by 52% from $1,571 million at December 31, 2001 to $746 million at May 31, 2002. Despite this decline in deposits, the Bank was able to maintain its net cash position of around $600 million throughout 2002 owing to, among other things, the repayment of loans funded with these deposits, reflecting the matched nature of the Banks loans and deposits. As of May 31, 2002, deposits represented 19% of total liabilities, with the balance composed of short-term obligations primarily from international banks and medium term obligations primarily from the debt capital
10
markets. Because Panama does not issue its own paper currency, the Banco Nacional de Panama does not act as a central bank in the traditional sense and is not a lender of last resort to the banking system in Panama. Accordingly, if the Bank faced a liquidity crisis, it would have to rely on commercial sources of liquidity and would not have access to a central bank lender of last resort, as would a bank located in the United States or in certain other countries.
Shares Eligible for Future Sale
Sales of substantial amounts of the Banks Class E shares in the public market could adversely affect the market price of such Class E shares. At the Banks annual shareholders meeting held on April 28, 2000 (the 2000 Annual Meeting), shareholders approved all amendments proposed in the amended and restated Articles of Incorporation of the Bank (the 2000 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation). In adopting the 2000 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, the shareholders approved three significant changes thereto, including a change in the capital structure of the Banks shares of common stock. This change consolidated the Banks Class B and Class C shares of common stock into a single class represented by new Class B shares of common stock and made such new Class B shares of common stock convertible at the option of the applicable shareholder, on a share-for-share basis, into the existing Class E shares. The holders of the new Class B shares may at any time, and with no limitation, exchange Class B shares for Class E shares, at a rate of one (1) Class B share for one (1) Class E share.
As of May 31, 2002, the conversion of all of the currently outstanding Class B shares would result in the issuance of approximately 3,842,479 additional Class E shares. As of the date of this Annual Report, a total of 55 Class B stockholders have converted 1,098,918 Class B shares for the same number of Class E shares. The conversion of a substantial number of Class B shares, or the availability of such shares for conversion and sale in the market, may adversely affect the market and price for Class E shares.
Competition
The Bank faces strong competition in making loans, attracting deposits and providing fee-generating services. The Banks competition in making loans comes principally from regional and international commercial banks. The Bank competes in its lending and deposit taking activities with other banks and international financial institutions, many of which have greater financial and other resources. See Information on the Company Competition.
Market Risk
The Banks risk management policies are designed to identify and control the Banks credit and market risks by establishing and monitoring appropriate limits on the Banks credit and market exposures. The Banks primary market risks are comprised of liquidity risk and interest rate risk and, to a lesser extent, currency exchange risk and price risk. See Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk and Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Liquidity and Capital Resources, Asset/Liability Management, and Interest Rate Sensitivity.
Political Events in Panama
The government of Panama is a republican and presidential system with a legislative body and an independent judiciary branch. In May 1999, presidential elections took place in an orderly fashion. The new democratically elected government was installed in September 1999. The country has experienced a significant economic recovery since its return to democracy in 1990. According to official Panamanian government figures, Panamas Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew in 1999 by an estimated 3.2%, in 2000 by an estimated 2.7% and in 2001 by an estimated 0.3%; however, there can be no assurance that such economic growth will be sustained. Panama has used the U.S. dollar as legal tender currency since its independence in 1903 and is, therefore, subject to fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar. Should any significant political crisis occur in Panama in the future, the operations of the Bank may be adversely affected.
11
Item 4. Information on the Company
History and Development of the Company
The Bank, headquartered in Panama City, Panama, is a specialized multinational bank established to finance trade in the Region. The Bank was established pursuant to a May 1975 proposal of the XX Assembly of Governors of central banks in the Region, which recommended the creation of a multinational organization to increase the foreign trade financing capacity of the Region. The Bank was incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Panama (Panama) on November 30, 1977 and continues to exist thereunder. Panama was selected as the location of the Banks headquarters because of the importance of the country as a banking center, the unrestricted circulation in Panama of the U.S. dollar, the absence of exchange controls, the geographic location of Panama and the quality of its communications facilities. Under special legislation enacted in 1978, the Bank was granted certain privileges by the government of Panama, including an exemption from the payment of income taxes in Panama. The Bank is considered a regional risk rather than a Panamanian risk by the Federal Reserve Board. Management believes that this classification is based upon the Banks ownership structure and the absence of Panamanian concentration in the Banks loan portfolio. The central banks of France, the United Kingdom and Spain do not consider the Bank a Panamanian country risk. The Bank began business operations on January 2, 1979. The Bank commenced operations with common stockholders equity of $25 million paid by 186 stockholders. Since then, the Banks common stockholders equity has increased to $598 million at December 31, 2001.
Banco Latinoamericano de Exportaciones, S. A. (in its individual capacity, BLADEX PANAMA) has three primary subsidiaries: Banco Latinoamericano de Exportaciones, Limited (BLADEX) (BLADEX Cayman), BLADEX Representacao Ltda. and BLADEX Holdings Inc. (BLADEX Holdings). BLADEX Cayman, which is a wholly owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands (B.W.I.) (the Cayman Islands) on September 8, 1987 and continues to exist thereunder. BLADEX Representacao Ltda., which was incorporated under the laws of Brazil on January 7, 2000 and continues to exist thereunder, was established to operate the Banks representative office in Brazil. BLADEX Representacao Ltda. is 99.999% owned by BLADEX Panama and 0.001% owned by BLADEX Cayman. BLADEX Holdings, which is a wholly owned subsidiary, was incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware on May 30, 2000 and continues to exist thereunder. BLADEX Holdings has a wholly-owned subsidiary, BLADEX Financial Services, LLC, incorporated under the laws of the state of New York on October 20, 2000 and continues to exist thereunder. BLADEX Financial Services, LLC has a wholly owned subsidiary, BLADEX Securities, LLC, which was established under the laws of the state of New York on October 20, 2000 and continues to exist thereunder.
The Bank established an agency in the State of New York (the New York Agency) which began business operations on March 27, 1989. The New York Agency, which continues to exist in the State of New York, is principally engaged in obtaining inter-bank deposits and short-term borrowings to finance the Banks short-term investments and foreign trade loans. Prior to the tragic events that occurred in the United States on September 11, 2001, the New York Agency and BLADEX Securities, LLC, were located at One World Trade Center, Suite No. 3227, in New York City. On October 1, 2001, as a result of the incidents of September 11, 2001, the Bank began leasing facilities for the New York Agency and BLADEX Securities, LLC, at 641 Lexington Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, N.Y. 10022. The Bank also has a representative office in Buenos Aires, Argentina and on November 29, 2000 opened a representative office in Mexico City, Mexico.
Central banks from 23 countries in the Region, or governmental financial institutions designated by such countries, own all of the Banks Class A shares, which currently comprise 28% of the Banks common stock. Currently, 159 commercial banks in the Region own the Banks Class B shares, which comprise 24% of the Banks common stock. The Banks Class E shares, which comprise 48% of its common stock, are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
12
The Bank is principally engaged in providing short-term and medium-term financing to selected commercial banks in the Region, which in turn lend to businesses primarily engaged in foreign trade and to state and private export institutions. As of December 31, 2001, the Bank provided financing to approximately 57 of its 182 stockholder banks and to 150 non-stockholder institutions. The Bank also lends directly to non-bank private entities, most of which are engaged in foreign trade in the Region, primarily through co-financing and loan syndications with other banks. The majority of the Banks short-term financing is extended in connection with specific foreign trade transactions that have been identified by the Bank.
At the 2000 Annual Meeting, shareholders approved the 2000 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, an English translation of which was attached to the Banks annual report on Form 20-F for the financial year ended December 31, 1999, which made three significant changes. The first significant change broadened the Banks powers to meet the evolving requirements of the Latin American and international markets in which it operates by restating and expanding the Banks primary purpose from promoting foreign trade to promoting the economic development of Latin American countries, mainly through foreign trade. This allowed the Bank to introduce new products and services while preserving and building upon its original mission to support the growth of trade finance in the Region. The intended result was that the Bank would be a more competitive company and be better able to develop its market position.
The second significant change approved by the shareholders at the 2000 Annual Meeting was a change in the composition of the Banks Board of Directors to allow for representation by members of the Board of Directors (each, a Director) of various classes of shares to be proportionate to the distribution of capital by class. Pursuant to the 2000 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, the number of Directors comprising the Board of Directors was reduced from 11 Directors prior to the approval of the 2000 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, to nine Directors, in order to have a more efficient Board of Directors. In addition, the 2000 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation mandate that one of the candidates nominated as a Director by the Board of Directors be the Chief Executive Officer of the Bank, thereby allowing greater participation of the Banks management in the decision and policymaking process. See Directors, Senior Management and Employees.
The third significant change was to consolidate the Banks Class B and Class C shares into a single class represented by new Class B shares and to make the new Class B shares convertible at the option of the shareholder, on a share-for-share basis, into the existing Class E shares, which trade on the New York Stock Exchange. The option to convert the new Class B shares provides for greater liquidity for the holders of Class B shares, as well as for the holders of Class E shares, by increasing the number of Class E shares trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Class E shares issued in exchange for Class B shares which have not been outstanding for at least two years, are not (unless they are registered by the Bank under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended) freely tradable on the New York Stock Exchange until the end of a two-year period, which begins when the Class B shares for which the new Class E shares are exchanged were originally issued.
On April 16, 2002 at the Banks annual shareholders meeting (the 2002 Annual Meeting), shareholders approved an amendment to the 2000 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (as so amended, the Articles of Incorporation) to change the structure and composition of the Banks Board of Directors. Pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation, the number of Directors comprising the Board of Directors was increased from nine Directors prior to the approval of the amendment to the 2000 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, to ten Directors, in order to have a more efficient Board of Directors.
The composition of the Board of Directors is as follows: three (3) Directors representing holders of the Class A common shares; two (2) Directors representing holders of the Class B common shares; three (3) Directors representing holders of the Class E common shares; and two (2) Directors representing all classes of common shares.
The Banks lending activities are funded by inter-bank deposits, primarily from central banks and financial institutions in the Region, by short-term and medium-term borrowings and by floating and fixed rate
13
placements made with financial institutions and investors in Japan, Europe and North America. The Bank does not provide retail-banking services to the general public such as retail savings accounts or checking accounts and does not take retail deposits.
Business Overview
Credit Portfolio and Lending Policies
The Banks Articles of Incorporation state that the Bank may not lend to an institution in a country in the Region unless the central bank or a designated government entity of that country is a holder of Class A shares of the Bank. It generally has been an operating policy of the Bank to extend credit directly to banks and state-owned export organizations within the Region. The Bank also lends to non-bank private entities, mostly through co-financing and loan participations with other banks. At December 31, 2001, total loans outstanding to non-bank private entities constituted 19.9% of the Banks total loans. All credit requests from eligible borrowers are analyzed in the light of commercial criteria, including economic and market conditions.
One of the most important components of the Banks strategy is to maximize its core business. This involves strengthening the operational and technological base of the Bank and a re-engineering of many of its work processes in order to become more efficient in an increasingly competitive marketplace. During 2001, the Bank implemented initiatives to improve the capabilities of its loan desk, implement a portfolio management approach to optimize the return on its credit portfolio, originate and sell more assets with better management of the risks involved, and improve the quality of client service. To improve its capabilities and become more marketing oriented, the Bank hired more specialized staff members, an investment the Bank believes is essential for it to remain competitive in the market. Most of these investments increased the Banks operating cost base in 2001 but, management believes, provided the foundation for revenue growth in future years.
In 2001, a structured trade unit was created in New York within BLADEX Securities, LLC and on May 23, 2001, BLADEX Securities, LLC received a broker-dealer license from the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. to buy and sell securities in the United States. During the second quarter of 2002, the Bank discontinued the operations of this unit due to, among other things, changing market conditions that were not favorable to the development of this business.
The Bank has 36 officers responsible for marketing the Banks financial products and services to existing and potential customers. This includes the personnel in its representative offices in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico, and the New York Agency.
The Bank finances export and import transactions for all types of goods and products, with the exception of the export or import of armaments, ammunition, military equipment, hallucinogenic drugs or narcotics that are not utilized for medical purposes, and any article the trading of which is widely prohibited due to its environmental hazards or due to trading limitations established by international agreements. Exports financed by the Bank are destined for buyers in countries both inside and outside the Region. In the same manner, imports financed by the Bank originate from sellers in countries both inside and outside the Region.
At regular intervals (usually at least once a year), the Bank conducts a credit review of each of its borrowers and of each country in the Region. The Banks credit review includes an analysis of the borrowers financial condition, trends in the borrowers financial condition, peer group comparisons, a review of credit references and a review of general economic conditions in the borrowers home country, and may include discussions with bank regulatory authorities in the borrowers home country. On the basis of its credit review, the Bank establishes credit limits for each country in the Region and for each of its borrowers. In order to prevent excessive concentration, the outstanding credit portfolio in a given country cannot exceed the lesser of (i) 40% of the total credit portfolio of the Bank, (ii) four times the Banks total capital (defined according to the Basle capital adequacy principles), and (iii) the country limit established by management and approved by the Board of Directors.
14
All country credit limits, along with targeted customers, business plans and risk profiles as to tenor and type of risk to be undertaken in a particular country, are approved by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors reviews and approves the credit limits for each country in the Region at least once a year. The Board of Directors also reviews and monitors the credit portfolio of the Bank, including all criticized credits, at least every quarter.
The Bank generally establishes lines of credit for each of its borrowers; however, the Bank is not obligated to lend under such lines of credit and must approve each lending transaction on a case-by-case basis. The Bank does not, as a general rule, publish or communicate its lending limits for countries in which it lends or its borrowers, but uses such limits internally as a credit risk management tool. Once a line of credit has been established, credit is generally extended after receipt of a request from the borrower for financing that is usually related to foreign trade. The pricing for such loans is determined in accordance with prevailing market conditions and the credit-worthiness of the borrower.
For existing borrowers, the Banks management has authority to approve credit lines up to the lending limit prescribed by Panamanian law (see Regulation Panamanian Law), provided that such credit lines are within the country credit limit for the borrowers country of domicile approved by the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2001, the lending limit prescribed by Panamanian law for any one borrower amounted to approximately $182 million. For new borrowers, the Banks management has authority to approve credit lines of up to $60 million. Any approval of credit lines by the Banks management is subject to the concurrence of the Banks Credit Committee, which is comprised of the Banks Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Operating Officer, and the heads of Risk Administration and Credit and Marketing or their designees. In addition, the Banks management may approve credit lines consisting of criticized credits of up $25 million for existing borrowers. Credit lines to new borrowers exceeding $60 million and credit lines to existing borrowers consisting of criticized credits exceeding $25 million must be approved by the Credit Policy and Risk Assessment Committee of the Board of Directors. At December 31, 2001, approximately 46 of the Banks existing 246 lines of credit required approval of the Credit Policy and Risk Assessment Committee of the Board of Directors, representing approximately 34% of the available amount under the Banks existing lines of credit.
The Banks general lending guidelines limit the amount of total credit that may be extended to any borrower to (i) an amount ranging from 10% to 50% of that borrowers equity, depending on the type of borrower and its credit-worthiness, and the term and nature of the transaction, (ii) up to 30% of the Banks total capital and reserves, depending on the type of borrower and its credit-worthiness, and (iii) up to 5% of the Banks total outstanding credit portfolio. The Board of Directors has made exceptions to the foregoing policies with respect to some of the Banks borrowers and, subject to the limits imposed by applicable law may make further exceptions in the future. As a result of the Banks decision to increase its allowance for credit losses and impairment losses on securities as of June 30, 2002 and the corresponding reduction in the Banks earnings, the Bank expects to exceed this 30% limit with respect to several borrowers. The Panamanian Banking Law also contains certain concentration limits, which are strictly adhered to by the Bank. See Regulation Panamanian Law.
The Banks loans are generally unsecured. However, in certain instances, based upon its credit review of the borrower and the economic and political situation and trends in the borrowers home country, the Bank has determined that the level of risk involved requires that a loan be secured by pledged deposits. The Bank has also in some instances either obtained an assignment of the trade related transaction documents and proceeds of the export transaction, such that the importer is obligated to make payments for the exported goods directly to the Bank, or obtained other appropriate collateral.
The Bank is also engaged in lending transactions not related to trade finance in order to service demand and to complement its overall credit relationship with high quality borrowers. The Bank has developed credit information on its borrowers over an extended period of time. Many of the Banks borrowers have been customers and stockholders for periods of over ten years. At December 31, 2001, total non-trade-related loans amounted to $1,555 million or 33% of the Banks total loans.
15
Credit Portfolio by Country
The following table sets forth information regarding the credit portfolio of the Bank by country at December 31 of each year set forth below.
Loan Portfolio
At December 31, 2001, the Banks total loans net of unearned income equaled $4,714 million or 80% of total assets. At December 31, 2001, net of allowance for loan losses and unearned income, the Banks loans equaled $4,536 million, 65% of which matured within one year. The Bank services all loans in its loan portfolio except syndicated loans, which are serviced through agent banks that are generally appointed by the arrangers of the syndication.
Short-Term Loans
The majority of the Banks short-term financing is extended in connection with specific foreign trade transactions that have been identified to the Bank. At December 31, 2001, short-term loans defined as loans with a maturity of less than one year, had an average term remaining to maturity of approximately 119 days. At that date, short-term loans amounted to $2,586 million or 54.6% of the Banks total loans.
Medium-Term Loans
The Bank is engaged in medium-term lending in which maturities generally range from one to five years. Medium-terms loans are extended primarily to banks and to a lesser extent to state-owned and private export related corporations in the Region. At December 31, 2001, the Banks medium-term loans had an average term remaining to maturity of approximately two years and one month. It is the Banks current policy to fund such medium-term lending primarily with medium-term liabilities and to limit such lending to between 2% (if the term to maturity is greater than five years) and 40% (if the term to maturity is between twelve and eighteen months) of its total credit portfolio, with additional percentage limitations (based on maturities) within that range. At
16
December 31, 2001, medium-term loans amounted to $2,148 million or 45.4% of the Banks total loans, of which $587 million had a remaining term to maturity of less than 365 days.
Loans by Country
The following table sets forth the distribution of the Banks loans (including short-term loans, medium-term loans and long-term loans) by country at December 31 of each year set forth below:
The above table does not include the Banks outstanding selected investment securities net of impairment loss (which were purchased as part of its credit portfolio activity), securities purchased under agreements to resell, letter of credit confirmations, customer liabilities under bankers acceptances and guarantees, each issued to, or issued by, borrowers in the Region, which totaled $1,663 million at December 31, 2001, and were distributed as of December 31, 2001 as follows: Argentina: $310 million; Brazil: $449 million; Chile: $1 million; Colombia: $56 million; Costa Rica: $2 million; the Dominican Republic: $46 million; Ecuador: $81 million; El Salvador: $42 million; Guatemala: $6 million; Jamaica: $12 million; Mexico: $229 million; Nicaragua: $6 million; Panama: $38 million; Peru: $51 million; Venezuela: $31 million; and Other: $303 million.
At December 31, 2001, the outstanding balance of medium and long-term loans (long-term loans being defined as having a term to maturity greater than five years) was $2,148 million, which was distributed as follows: Argentina: $480 million; Bolivia: $1 million; Brazil: $945 million; Chile: $18 million; Colombia: $88 million; Costa Rica: $8 million; the Dominican Republic: $70 million; Mexico: $312 million; Nicaragua: $2 million; Panama: $20 million; Peru: $47 million; and Venezuela: $157 million.
At December 31, 2001, approximately 86% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Banks loans was made to borrowers in five countries: Brazil (approximately 43%), Mexico (approximately 18%), Argentina (approximately 17%), Venezuela (approximately 5%), and the Dominican Republic (approximately 4%). In addition, at December 31, 2001, 24% of the Banks total loans were to seven borrowers in Brazil and 15% of the Banks total loans were to seven borrowers in Mexico.
17
Loans by Type of Borrower
The following table sets forth the amounts of the Banks loans by type of borrower in the Region at December 31 of each year set forth below:
Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell
The Bank purchases securities under agreements to resell the same or substantially identical securities. These agreements are considered secured loans. The purchased securities generally consist of U.S. Treasury and other debt securities. At December 31, 2001, securities purchased under agreements to resell with counterparties in Argentina had a carrying value of $291.9 million, all of which were fully secured with U.S Treasury securities and, in accordance with market practice, had the additional coverage of a margin call in cash. At December 31, 2001, the term to maturity of these agreements did not exceed 30 days and the interest payments were current. The outstanding balance of these instruments at June 21, 2002 was $152.3 million.
Investments
The Banks investments primarily consist of securities held to maturity and securities available for sale. The Banks treasury investment policy contemplates the purchase of investment grade securities (carrying two of the following ratings: A-1, P-1 or F-1 from Standard & Poors, Moodys or Fitch, respectively) having maturities of up to three years.
The Bank has classified under investments certain securities which do not adhere to the Banks treasury investment policy, such as bonds and floating rate notes that were bought as part of its credit portfolio lending policy and which are subject to the same credit approval criteria as the rest of the credit portfolio. At December 31, 2001, these securities represented 98% of total investments. The Bank has classified as securities available for sale certain debt instruments, such as negotiable commercial paper, certificates of deposit, bonds and floating rate notes. The Bank buys these securities with the intention of selling them in the future.
The following table sets forth information regarding the carrying value of the Banks investment portfolio at December 31 of each year set forth below:
18
At December 31, 2001, the total carrying value of investment securities is net of an impairment loss of $40.4 million, which was charged to operations, resulting primarily from the impairment of Argentine securities that were purchased under the Banks credit portfolio lending policy. See Asset Quality and Impaired Assets.
At December 31, 1999 and 2000, the Banks New York Agency had pledged certificates of deposit with the State of New York Banking Department, as required by law, with a carrying value of $4.0 million and $3.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2001 the pledged certificates of deposit had an outstanding balance of $6.0 million. At December 31, 2001, the Banks investment portfolio had a weighted average maturity of approximately one year and one month and a weighted average interest rate of 6.95% per annum.
Total Outstandings by Country
The following table sets forth the aggregate amount of the Banks cross-border outstandings, including cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks, investment securities net of impairment loss and loans (collectively Cross-Border Outstandings) at December 31 of each year set forth below:
19
The following table sets forth the amount of the Banks Cross-Border Outstandings by type of institution at December 31 for each of the years set forth below:
Letters of Credit, Guarantees and Customer Liabilities under Acceptances
Letters of credit, guarantees and customer liabilities under acceptances are considered part of the credit portfolio because the Bank applies the same credit standards used in its lending process in its evaluation of these instruments. At December 31, 2001, total letters of credit, guarantees and customer liabilities under acceptances amounted to $911 million, which represented 14% of the Banks total credit portfolio.
The Bank advises and confirms letters of credit to facilitate internal and external regional trade transactions. The Bank also issues stand-by letters of credit and guarantees to provide coverage for country risk arising from the risk of convertibility and transferability of local currency of countries in the Region into hard currency. However, in a few cases, the Bank also issues stand-by letters of credit and guarantees to provide coverage for country risk arising from political risks, such as expropriation, nationalization, war and/or civil disturbances. At December 31, 2001, total stand-by letters of credit and guarantees representing country risk coverage amounted to $223 million, of which $31 million represented Argentine country risk exposure.
20
Asset Quality
Since the commencement of the Banks operations in 1979 through December 31, 2001, the Bank has had charge-offs totaling $77 million. Impaired assets constituted 0.45%, 0.28% and 1.4% of the total credit portfolio of the Bank at December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively. At May 31, 2002, impaired assets comprised 3.1% of the total credit portfolio, almost all of which constituted Argentine exposure.
Although the Bank is exposed to the types of problems that are currently affecting Argentina, the Bank attributes its asset quality to the trade-related nature of its loan portfolio (loans plus selected investments); the composition of its client base, which consists primarily of commercial banks, central banks, state-owned institutions and top tier private corporations; the importance that governments and borrowers in the Region attach to maintaining their continuing access to trade financing; and the Banks strict adherence to commercial criteria in its credit activities. The Bank has developed an in-depth knowledge of and relationship with its client base throughout its 23 years of operations in the Region, which allows it to continue to further enhance its risk management process.
The management of the Bank reviews a report of all loan delinquencies on a daily basis. The Banks collection policies include rapid internal notification of any delinquency and prompt initiation of collection efforts, usually with the involvement of senior management.
Impaired Assets
Loans are identified as impaired and placed on non-accrual status when any payment of principal or interest is over 90 days past due or earlier if the Banks management determines that the ultimate collection of principal or interest is doubtful. In all cases, if a borrower has more than one loan outstanding under its line of credit with the Bank and any of its individual loans is placed on non-accrual status, the Bank places all outstanding loans to that borrower on non-accrual status. In the same manner, if a single note of a loan is placed on non-accrual status, the remaining notes under that loan are placed on non-accrual status as well. Securities that experience a decline in value, which is deemed other than temporary, are classified as impaired.
The following table sets forth information regarding the Banks impaired assets at the dates indicated below.
Impaired loans
Total impaired loans were $77.1 million at December 31, 2001 compared to $14.7 and $23.8 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
21
On April 1, 1999, the Bank identified several impaired loans totaling $13 million to a Mexican corporation that had experienced liquidity problems. On June 1, 1999, the Bank identified several impaired loans totaling $11 million to an Argentine bank. During the second quarter of 1999, the Bank received a payment of $1.6 million relating to an impaired loan. During the third quarter of 1999, the Bank identified impaired loans for $6.3 million to a Canadian company and then charged off its total exposure of $6.3 million to this Canadian company during the fourth quarter of 1999. Also during the fourth quarter of 1999, the Bank identified impaired loans totaling $2.0 million and received a payment of $0.7 million relating to an impaired loan, bringing the balance of impaired loans to $23.8 million at December 31, 1999.
During the first quarter of 2000, the Bank received a payment of $1.9 million relating to an impaired loan. During the second quarter of 2000, the Bank identified impaired loans totaling $4.3 million to an Ecuadorian bank and $4.1 million to an Argentine corporation. Also during this period, the Bank received a payment of $0.3 million relating to an impaired loan. During the third quarter of 2000, the Bank identified impaired loans totaling $1.6 million to a Nicaraguan bank. During the fourth quarter of 2000 the Bank identified impaired loans totaling $4.4 million to a Peruvian bank and then charged-off its total exposure of $11.4 million and $4.1 million to a Mexican corporation and an Argentine corporation, respectively, previously classified as impaired. Also during the fourth quarter of 2000 the Bank received payments of $1.7 million relating to impaired loans, bringing the balance of impaired loans to $14.7 million at December 31, 2000.
During 2001, the Bank charged-off an impaired loan of $10.3 million to an Argentine bank and an additional $ 0.1 million was recovered on a bank loan charged-off in 1998. At December 31, 2001, loans to an Argentine bank, a Mexican corporation and an Argentine corporation were identified as impaired, making a total of $77.1 million.
The Bank had no other material non-accruing loans and no other material troubled debt restructuring at any of the dates indicated in the above table, except for loans totaling $7.8 million to an Ecuadorian financial institution, $1.5 million to a Mexican corporation, and $33.8 million to four institutions in Argentina, all of which are classified as criticized loans. Management does not believe that there is a material amount of loans not included in this Annual Report with respect to which it has serious doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms and which may result in such loans becoming non-accruing loans, except for the Banks total exposure in Argentina which, given current market conditions, the Bank expects will have to be renegotiated and restructured. See Key Information Risk Factors Regional Economic Conditions.
Impaired Securities
During the third quarter of 1997, the Bank entered into a series of put option contracts providing for guarantees to a counterparty with respect to certain assets with an aggregate face value of $221.4 million. At certain specified exercise dates, or if an event of default occurs, the counterparty has the right to sell an underlying asset to the Bank generally at par, if the market yield on the underlying asset exceeds the strike yield under the contract. The underlying assets consist of debt issued by several sovereign borrowers in the Region. From 1998 through 2000, the counterparty exercised put options in the amount of $96.4 million, under which the Bank purchased the underlying assets (generally at par) and booked them as investments held to maturity at their respective market values. At December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, the notional value of the remaining options was $150 million, $100 million and $100 million, respectively.
Of the options exercised in 1999, an underlying asset for $15 million represented defaulted bonds. These defaulted bonds were booked at their market value of $3.7 million, and the balance was charged-off against the Banks allowance for guarantees. These defaulted bonds were sold in 2001. At December 31, 2001, the Bank identified impaired securities of $50 million from two Argentine banks and charged an impairment loss of $40.4 million to earnings relating thereto. As of June 21, 2002, no losses have been charged to earnings as a result of impaired securities in 2002.
22
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses covers the credit risk on loans and contingencies. This allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level that is adequate in managements judgment to provide for estimated probable credit losses inherent in various on and off balance sheet financial instruments, based upon the following factors: (i) the economic conditions in the countries of the Region in which the Bank lends and the potential impact of these economic conditions on foreign exchange availability and the trade related economic sectors in these countries; (ii) the Regions volatility and vulnerability to external factors; (iii) the nature and characteristics of the Banks loan portfolio, which is primarily unsecured and contains some large loans and significant country concentrations; and (iv) the size of the Banks credit portfolio.
In estimating losses on impaired loans the Banks management considers a number of variables including, as appropriate, the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans contractual effective rate, the secondary market value of the loan and the fair value of the collateral.
In addition, the Bank maintains credit loss reserves for probable losses on the entire credit portfolio of the Bank net of impaired credits. On a quarterly basis, the Bank estimates probable credit losses using a provisioning matrix model which differentiates risk into three categories: country risk, borrower risk and transaction type risk, and aggregates the sum of these factors. To determine the probability of loss due to country risk, the Bank uses sovereign ratings of well-known independent rating agencies. For borrower risk, the Bank uses the probability of default matrix of a well-known rating agency. The Bank evaluates the transaction risk mainly by taking into account whether the risk is a short-term trade transaction or otherwise. This model is a tool to estimate and validate the levels of reserves required, since it does not take into account all variables affecting asset quality. Therefore, the Bank also reviews the adequacy of reserves, taking into account regional political, financial and economic trends affecting the portfolio, delinquency trends, volatility and significant concentrations that are not fully reflected in the model, and then adjusts the level of required reserves accordingly as of the end of each quarterly period.
During the fourth quarter of 1999, in accordance with current accounting practices, the Bank changed the apportionment and presentation of the allowance for credit losses by dividing such losses into three components:
However, on January 1, 2001, as a result of the adoption of SFAS 133, the allowance for losses on guarantees was eliminated. See Allowance for Losses on Guarantees below.
The following table sets forth information regarding the Banks allowance for possible credit losses with respect to total credits outstanding at the dates indicated.
23
Management believes that the Banks reserve level should reflect the potential for political and economic instability in countries in the Region and economic cycles. The recent events in Argentina provide an example of the potential for economic instability in the Region and the need to maintain reserves at a conservative level. Given the Banks large exposure to borrowers in a number of countries in the Region with the potential for economic and/or political instability and their high dependency on external capital, the Bank believes that its policy regarding the allowance for credit losses is appropriate. See Loans by Country. The determination of the appropriate level of allowances for credit losses necessarily requires managements judgment, including assumptions and estimates made in the context of rapidly changing political and economic conditions in many of the countries in the Region. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Banks current level of reserves will prove to be adequate in light of current and future events, particularly in Argentina. As of December 31, 2001, the total allowance for credit losses was $195 million, reflecting additional provisions taken in 2001 of $77.1 million, compared to $19.2 million in 2000. This allowance includes $113.9 million corresponding to Argentina, of which $23.9 million represents reserves for specific Argentine loans. The Banks Board of Directors has determined to further increase the allowance for credit losses and impairment losses on securities as of June 30, 2002 to approximately $510 million, of which approximately $420 million will relate to its Argentine portfolio.
The Bank does not have a rigid charge-off policy, but instead charges-off loans on a case-by-case basis as determined by management and as approved by the Board of Directors. See Notes 6 and 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Allowance for Losses on Guarantees
During the third quarter of 1997, the Bank entered into a series of put option contracts providing for guarantees to a counterparty with respect to certain assets with an aggregate face value of $221.4 million. At certain specified exercise dates, or in the event of default, the counterparty has the right to sell an underlying asset to the Bank (generally at par), if the market yield on the underlying asset exceeds the strike yield set forth in the contract. The underlying assets consist of debt issued by several sovereign borrowers in the Region.
During the fourth quarter of 1997, the Bank established a $5 million allowance for potential credit and market value losses in connection with these put option contracts. During 1998, the Bank charged-off $2.1 million for put options exercised, which reflected the difference between the market price and the par value of assets bought under these put option contracts. The Bank also added $15.5 million to the allowance for losses on guarantees during 1998, bringing the accumulated allowance for losses on guarantees to $18.4 million at December 31, 1998. In 1999 and 2000, the Banks counterparty exercised options in the amount of $45 million and $50 million, respectively, under which the Bank purchased the underlying assets generally at par and booked them as investments held to maturity at their respective market values. At December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001,
24
the notional value of the remaining options was $150, $100 and $100 million, respectively. At December 31, 2001, the underlying assets relating to these options consisted of bonds issued by sovereign entities, of which 75% were issued by Mexico and 25% by Colombia. As of December 31, 2001, the average remaining exercise period of the options was approximately eight months. At this time the Bank is unsure whether further losses on these option contracts will be incurred as such losses would depend primarily on changes in the market value of the underlying assets relating thereto.
The balance of the allowance for losses on guarantees at December 31, 2000 and 1999 was $5.0 million and $6.8 million, respectively. On January 1, 2001, as a result of the adoption of SFAS 133, the allowance for losses on guarantees was eliminated and the balance of $5.0 million was applied to cover the fair market valuation of the remaining options at that date. See Note 7 (Allowance for Credit Losses) of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenues Per Country
The following table sets forth information regarding the Banks approximate net revenues per country at the dates indicated below, with net revenues calculated as the sum of net interest income, net commission income, gains on sale of securities available for sale and other income.
The Bank operates in a highly competitive environment in most of its markets. Management recognizes that the Bank needs to continue to invest and adapt to remain competitive. The Bank faces strong competition in making loans, in attracting deposits and in providing fee-generating services. The Banks competition in making loans comes principally from regional and international banks. Financial desintermediation by the securities market and specialized finance companies is another factor that represents competition to the Banks lending activity. Whenever economic conditions and risk perception improve in the largest countries of the Region, the competition from commercial banks, the securities markets and other new players increases accordingly. This competition may have the effect of reducing the spreads of the Banks lending rates over its cost of funds and
25
constraining the Banks profitability in the future. The Bank competes in its lending and deposit taking activities with other banks and international financial institutions, many of which have greater financial resources and offer sophisticated banking services.
The Bank believes that most of the competition it faces in the trade financing area and within the markets served by the Bank is from over one hundred international banks, mostly European and North American, which provide similar financing services. Although these international banks compete with the Bank, they are also providers of funding for the Bank and represent a source of business for the Bank. The Bank participates in transactions arranged by international banks, engages in co-financing with international and local banks to lend to borrowers in the Region, and sells loans and risk participations to international and local banks. Most of these international banks provide credit facilities to the Bank to finance the Banks trade finance activity. The Bank also lends to branches or subsidiaries of certain international banks in the Region. At December 31, 2001, loans to international banks represented approximately 19% of the Banks total loans. Furthermore, the Bank provides country risk coverage to branches of certain international banks that want to increase their activity in the Region, but cannot increase cross-border risks.
The Bank believes that competition also comes from investment banks and the securities markets, which provides liquidity to the financial systems in certain countries in the Region as well as non-bank specialized financial institutions. The Bank competes primarily on the basis of competitive pricing in financing trade-related transactions. The Bank believes that it continues to possess a competitive advantage in that it enables its customer banks to meet their clients financing needs, but does not compete directly with these banks for the business of their clients. Moreover, the Bank has developed customer loyalty because it has been a consistent source of trade-related financing. The Bank believes that it is an important source of trade finance to many of its clients. The Bank also believes that its operating efficiencies and business focus constitute important competitive advantages in certain markets.
The trade financing business is also subject to changes. Increased open account exports and new financing requirements from multinational corporations are putting more pressure on the way banks traditionally intermediate foreign trade financing. The Bank cannot predict with certainty the changes that may occur and affect the competitiveness of its businesses. Although the Bank has undertaken several initiatives to adapt to and benefit from these changes, it is possible that competition with the Banks products will, in the future, reduce demand for the Banks services. If this were to occur, the Bank may be required to take steps to further adapt to the changing competitive environment.
Consolidation in the banking systems of the markets in which the Bank operates could potentially affect the competitive environment in these markets. The consolidation process in most countries of the Region has reduced the number of client banks that the Bank can work with. The acquisition of local banks by large international banks in the local markets of the Region may also change the competitive environment. The Bank cannot predict with certainty the extent to which these changes in the banking industry may occur or the success that they may achieve. Although the Bank currently has a strong position in each of its market segments and is undertaking several initiatives to adapt, these changes in the business and in the markets of this Region could potentially place the Bank at a competitive disadvantage with respect to scale, resources and its ability to develop and diversify its sources of income. See Credit Portfolio and Lending Policies, Loan PortfolioInvestments and Letters of Credit, Guarantees and Customer Liabilities under Acceptances.
Regulation
General
The Superintendence of Banks of Panama (the Superintendence of Banks) regulates, supervises and examines BLADEX. In addition, BLADEX Cayman is regulated, supervised and examined by government authorities in the Cayman Islands, and the New York Agency is regulated, supervised and examined by the New York Banking Department and the Federal Reserve Board. BLADEX Cayman and the New York Agency held
26
$371 million and $368 million in assets, respectively, at December 31, 2001. The regulation of the Bank and BLADEX Cayman by relevant Panamanian and Cayman Islands authorities differs from the regulation generally imposed on banks in the United States by federal and state regulatory authorities.
Panamanian Law
On February 26, 1998, Panama adopted Decree-Law No. 9 (the Banking Law), which is a comprehensive revision and restatement of the banking legislation in Panama. The Banking Law took effect on June 12, 1998.
BLADEX operates in Panama under a General Banking License issued by the National Banking Commission, predecessor of the Superintendence of Banks, and is subject to supervision and examination by the Superintendence of Banks. Banks operating under a General Banking License (General License Banks) are entitled to engage in all aspects of the business of banking in Panama, including accepting local and offshore deposits as well as entering into banking transactions in Panama that may have an economic impact outside of Panama.
General License Banks must have a paid-in capital of not less than $10 million. Additionally, General License Banks must maintain minimum capital of 8% of their total risk-weighted assets. Capital is defined to include primary capital and secondary capital. Primary capital (Tier 1 capital) is comprised of paid-in capital, declared reserves and retained earnings while secondary capital (Tier 2 capital) includes undeclared reserves, reevaluations reserves, general reserves for losses, certain hybrid debt capital instruments and certain subordinated indebtedness. Secondary capital may not exceed primary capital. The Superintendence of Banks is authorized to increase the minimum capital requirement percentage in Panama in the event that generally accepted international capitalization standards as set forth in the Basle Accord become more stringent, in order to comply with such new international standards.
General License Banks are required to maintain 30% of their global deposits in liquid assets (which include short-term loans to other banks and other liquid assets) of the type prescribed by the Superintendence of Banks. In addition, General License Banks are required to maintain local assets in Panama in an amount not less than 85% of the deposits received from entities in Panama.
Regulations regarding interest rate ceilings provided for in the prior banking law have been abolished by the Banking Law. Currently, banks in Panama can freely fix the amount of interest to be charged on their loans and with respect to operations. Banks in Panama are required to indicate the effective interest rates of loans and deposits in their statements to clients or at a clients request. Under the Banking Law, deposits from central banks and other similar financial institutions are immune from any attachment or seizure proceedings.
Pursuant to the Banking Law, no bank in Panama may make loans or issue guarantees or any other obligations, to any one person or a group of related persons in excess of 25% of the Banks total capital; provided that, for Panamanian banks (i) whose shares are owned by governmental institutions and private institutions, (ii) whose principal office is located in Panama, and (iii) whose main line of business is lending to other banks (Exempted Banks), the foregoing lending limit is 30%. BLADEX is an Exempted Bank. Although the Banks anticipated increase in the allowance for credit losses and impairment losses on securities will cause the Bank to exceed this 30% limitation in certain instances, based upon discussions with the Superintendence of Banks, the Banks management expects to receive a waiver of this requirement with respect to existing credits.
Under the Banking Law, a bank may not make loans or issue guarantees or any other obligations that are in (i) excess of 5% of its total capital, in the case of unsecured transactions, (ii) excess of 10% of its total capital, in the case of collateralized transactions (other than loans secured by deposits in the bank), and (iii) excess of 50% of its total capital, in the case of loans secured by deposits in the bank to (a) any one or more of the Banks directors, (b) to any shareholder of the bank who directly or indirectly owns 5% or more of the outstanding and issued capital stock of the bank, (c) to any company of which one or more of the Banks directors is a director or officer or where one or more of the Banks directors is a guarantor of the loan or credit facility, (d) to any
27
company or entity in which the bank or any one of its directors or officers can exercise a controlling influence, (e) to any company or entity in which the bank or any one of its directors or officers owns 20% or more of the outstanding and issued capital stock of such company or entity or (f) to managers, officers and employees of the bank, or their respective spouses (other than home mortgage loans or guaranteed personal loans under general programs approved by the bank for employees). The Superintendence of Banks has the power to allow Exempted Banks not to take into consideration loans granted to other banks for purposes of determining compliance with the above lending limits, provided that certain conditions of transparency and independence are met, as prescribed under the Banking Law.
The Banking Law contains further limitations and restrictions with respect to loans and credit facilities to parties related to the lending banks. For instance, under the Banking Law, all loans made to managers, officers, employees or shareholders who are owners of 5% or more of the lending Banks outstanding and issued capital stock shall be made on terms and conditions similar to those given by the bank to its clients in arms-length transactions and which reflect market conditions. In addition, shares of a bank cannot be pledged or offered as security for loans or credit facilities issued by such bank.
In addition to the foregoing requirements, there are certain other restrictions applicable to General License Banks, including (i) a requirement that a bank must notify the Superintendence of Banks before opening a branch or office in Panama and obtain approval from the Superintendence of Banks before opening a branch or subsidiary outside Panama and (ii) a requirement that a bank obtain approval from the Superintendence of Banks before it liquidates its operations, merges or consolidates with another bank or sells all or substantially all of its assets.
The Banking Law provides that banks in Panama are subject to inspection by the Superintendence of Banks, which must take place at least once every two years. Such supervisory powers of the Superintendence of Banks also extend to a banks subsidiaries and branches. BLADEX was last inspected in 2001 by the Superintendence of Banks. The result of the inspection was fully satisfactory. BLADEX is required to file monthly balance sheets and related financial statements with the Superintendence of Banks. Additionally, banks are required to file with the Superintendence of Banks quarterly and annual statements indicating the performance of their credit facilities and other reports and information, as prescribed by the Superintendence of Banks. In addition, banks are required to make available for inspection their accounting records, minutes, reports on cash on hand, securities, receipts, and any other reports or documents that are necessary for the Superintendence of Banks to ensure compliance with Panamanian banking laws and regulations. Banks subject to supervision may be fined by the Superintendence of Banks for violations of Panamanian banking laws and regulations. The Bank has advised the Superintendence of Banks of its recent decision to increase its allowance for credit losses in connection with its exposure to Argentina and to formulate a recapitalization plan and will continue to keep the Superintendence of Banks advised of further developments with respect to its Argentine credit portfolio and the progress of its recapitalization plan.
Under the Banking Law, the Superintendence of Banks may order the reorganization of a bank when it considers this course of action to be in the best interests of the depositors, and to guarantee the solvency and continuity of such bank. The Superintendence of Banks is given broad powers to reorganize a bank. The Superintendence of Banks may request the shareholders of a bank to pay in additional capital or authorize the issuance of new shares and the sale of such shares to third parties at prices pre-determined by the Superintendence of Banks. Furthermore, the Superintendence of Banks may recommend fundamental restructuring schemes, including merger or consolidation with other banks, negotiation of bridge loans, sale or partial liquidation of assets and granting of security interests in connection with such reorganization plans. Ultimately, if the reorganization of the applicable bank fails, the Superintendence of Banks may begin the liquidation process.
The Banking Law has established an annual supervisory charge to be paid by General License Banks equal to $30,000 plus $35.00 per $1 million in assets, with the latter amount being limited to a maximum charge of $100,000. The total amount due in this regard by BLADEX for the year 2001 was $130,000.
28
Cayman Islands Law
BLADEX Cayman was registered on September 8, 1987, under The Companies Law (1985 Revision) of the Cayman Islands. BLADEX Cayman is the holder of a category B banking license issued under the Banks and Trust Companies Law (2001 Second Revision) of the Cayman Islands (the Banks and Trust Companies Law). As the holder of a category B banking license, BLADEX Cayman is licensed to carry on all kinds of banking business in any part of the world other than the Cayman Islands, subject to the restrictions set forth in Section 6 of the Banks and Trust Companies Law, which restricts the holder of a category B banking license from taking deposits from persons resident in the Cayman Islands or investing in any asset representing a claim on any person resident in the Cayman Islands, subject to certain exceptions in respect of, inter alia, exempted or ordinary non-resident companies and other licensees.
Banks and trust companies in the Cayman Islands must be licensed under the Banks and Trust Companies Law. Such license applications are processed by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority. Currently, there are approximately 399 banks licensed in the Cayman Islands, of which approximately 88 have a physical presence in the Cayman Islands. Licensed banks are regulated by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority. The Governor-in-Council and the Managing Director of the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority have wide powers under the Banks and Trust Companies Law to investigate the activities and review the banking practices of licensees, and to protect the interests of depositors. The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority examines the affairs and business of licensees through examination of audited and unaudited financial statements and other regular returns, or in any other manner, for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the Banks and Trust Companies Law. The Governor-in-Council has power to grant and revoke licenses, impose conditions upon a licensee, appoint advisers to licensees and appoint a receiver or manager of a licensee, though these functions are in the process of being transferred to the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority.
The International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards established by the Basle Committee on Banking Regulations and Supervisory Practices have been adopted by the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority. The registered office of BLADEX Cayman is at the UBS House, P.O. Box 1989, Elgin Avenue, George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, British West Indies.
United States
New York State Law. The New York Agency, established in 1989, is licensed by the Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York (the Superintendent) under the New York Banking Law. The New York Agency is examined by the New York State Banking Department and is subject to banking laws and regulations applicable to a foreign bank that operates a New York agency. In this regard, New York agencies of foreign banks are regulated substantially the same as, and have similar powers to, New York state-chartered banks, except with respect to deposit-taking activities.
The Superintendent is empowered by law to require any agency of a foreign bank to maintain in New York specified assets equal to a percentage of the agencys liabilities, as the Superintendent may designate. At present, the Superintendent has set this percentage at the greater of 5% of the New York Agencys total assets or 1% of the consolidated total assets of the New York Agency and New York I.B.F. (International Banking Facility) or $1.0 million, although specific asset maintenance requirements may be imposed upon individual agencies of foreign banks on a case-by-case basis. No such special requirement has been prescribed for the New York Agency.
The Superintendent is authorized to take possession of the business and property of a New York agency of a foreign bank whenever an event occurs that would permit the Superintendent to take possession of the business and property of a state-chartered bank. These events include the violation of any law, unsafe business practices, an impairment of capital, and the suspension of payments of obligations. In liquidating or dealing with an agencys business after taking possession of the agency, the New York Banking Law provides that the claims
29
of creditors which arose out of transactions with the agency are granted a priority with respect to the agencys assets over other creditors of the foreign bank.
Federal Law. In addition to being subject to New York State laws and regulations, the New York Agency is subject to federal regulations, primarily under the International Banking Act of 1978 (the IBA). The IBA generally extends federal banking supervision and regulation to the United States offices of foreign banks. Under the IBA, the United States branches and agencies of foreign banks, including the New York Agency, are subject to reserve requirements on certain deposits. At present, the New York Agency has no deposits subject to such requirements. The New York Agency is also subject to reporting and examination requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve Board similar to those imposed on domestic banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System. In this regard, the Foreign Bank Supervision Enhancement Act of 1991 (the FBSEA) has amended the IBA to enhance the authority of the Federal Reserve Board to supervise the operations of foreign banks in the United States. In particular, the FBSEA has expanded the Boards authority to regulate the entry of foreign banks into the United States, supervise their ongoing operations, conduct and coordinate examinations of their U.S. offices with state banking authorities, and terminate their activities in the United States for violations of law or for unsafe or unsound banking practices.
In addition, under the FBSEA, state-licensed branches and agencies of foreign banks may not engage in any activity that is not permissible for a federal branch (i.e., a branch of a foreign bank licensed by the federal government through the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency of the Treasury Department (OCC), rather than by a state), unless the Federal Reserve Board has determined that such activity is consistent with sound banking practices. The IBA also restricts the ability of a foreign bank with a branch or agency in the United States to engage in non-banking activities in the United States, to the same extent as a United States bank holding company. Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999 (the GLB Act), a foreign bank with a branch or agency in the United States may engage in a broader range of non-banking financial activities, provided it has qualified and registered with the Federal Reserve Board to be a financial holding company (FHC). As of the date hereof, BLADEX has not registered with the Federal Reserve Board as an FHC.
The New York Agency does not engage in retail deposit-taking in the United States, and deposits with the New York Agency are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Under the FBSEA, the New York Agency may not obtain FDIC insurance and generally may not accept deposits of less than $100,000.
Organizational Structure
See History and Development of the Company.
Property, Plant and Equipment
The Bank owns its principal offices located at Calle 50 y Aquilino de La Guardia in Panama City, which were completed in 1983. The building, with office space of 3,457 square meters, is used solely by the Bank and is located on a 2,672 square meter site in the banking district of the city. During 1997, the Bank expanded its principal office space to accommodate the Banks existing growth. In early 1999, the Bank rented office space in a nearby building, expanding its office space by 622 square meters. In addition, the Bank leases the following office space: (i) 150 square meters for its Buenos Aires Representative Office at Ave. Corrientes 617, 9 Piso, Buenos Aires, Argentina, (ii) 149 square meters for BLADEX Representacao Ltda. at Rua Leopoldo Couto de Magalhäes Junior 110, 9º Andar, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, and (iii) 130 square meters for its Mexico City Representative Office at Ruben Dario 281, Oficina No 1203, Colonia Bosque de Chapultepec, Mexico City, Mexico. Prior to the attack on New Yorks World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, the Bank leased 967 square meters of office space for its New York Agency and BLADEX Securities, LLC at One World Trade Center, Suite No. 3227, New York City. On October 1, 2001, the Bank began leasing 678 square meters of office space for its New York operations, including the New York Agency and BLADEX Securities, LLC, at 641
30
Lexington Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, NY 10022. See also Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects
Operating Results
The Bank derives its income principally from net interest income and, to a lesser extent, from fee income. Net interest income (the difference between the interest income the Bank receives on interest-earning assets and the interest it pays on interest-bearing liabilities) is generated mostly by the Banks lending activities. Fee income is generated by the issuance, confirmation and negotiation of letters of credit and guarantees covering commercial and country risk, loan origination and sales and, to a lesser extent, foreign exchange activities.
Although inflation rates in the Region remained in the single digits during 1999, fears of inflation resulting from currency devaluation, among other factors, lead to increases in interest rates, which caused recessionary pressures in many of the countries in the Region. The economic slowdown in a majority of the Banks target markets affected trade flows and the demand for credit, which contributed to the decline in the Banks credit portfolio in 1999. However, the recessionary environment also negatively affected financial markets risk perception of the Region and as a result the Bank benefited from improved lending margins.
In 2000, economic recovery in several of the Banks target markets was much slower than expected. Business opportunities for the Bank were adversely affected by political and fiscal events, which diminished the economic stability of some countries in its market. At the same time, improved sentiment in financial markets towards the Region, particularly towards its largest markets, contributed to an increase in the availability of credit, which put pressure on lending margins.
The operating environment in the Latin American region deteriorated throughout 2001. This increased the risk perception of the Region and contributed directly to a less successful performance by the Bank than expected. The events of September 11 and their aftermath worsened already deteriorating economic conditions worldwide. The prolonged deterioration in Argentinas economic and political environment, financial condition and investor confidence therein resulted in a profound crisis which forced the Argentine government to adopt stringent measures and had an impact on the Banks Argentine portfolio at the end of the year. These factors resulted in the Bank making an approximately $77 million provision for credit losses and recognizing an approximately $40 million impairment loss on securities in 2001 which reduced net income dramatically compared to 2000. See also Key Information Risk Factors Regional Economic Conditions.
The following table summarizes changes in components of the Banks net income and performance at and for the periods indicated below.
31
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, which constitutes the principal source of income for the Bank, increased from $112.7 million in 1999 and 2000 to $118.8 million in 2001. Net interest income in 2000 was almost the same as 1999 because lower interest earning assets and margins were offset by higher return on available capital funds due to higher interest rates in 2000 as compared to 1999. The increase in net interest income in 2001 was due primarily to the 17% growth of the average loan portfolio (loans and investment securities) and the positive effect of the interest rate gap. These factors were offset by lower average lending margins and lower interest income on available capital funds generated by a lower interest rate environment in 2001 as compared to 2000.
The Bank believes that the most important factors that affect net interest income are operating net interest income, the effect of the interest rate gap, interest income on available capital funds and one-time interest income and adjustments. Operating net interest income consists of interest income generated by the Banks lending activities, which is the difference between average lending margins and the marginal cost of funds. Operating net interest income increased from $58.7 million in 2000 to $67.0 million in 2001, due to the 17% growth in the loan portfolio, which offset lower lending margins in 2001 as compared to 2000. The effect of the interest rate gap consists of interest income generated by the mismatch between the maturities of assets and the maturities of liabilities. The Banks short-term loan portfolio has an average life of 242 days and is priced based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) for periods corresponding to the individual loan maturities. A portion of these loans is funded by deposits, which have an average life of 78 days. As a result, deposits reprice faster than loans. In a declining interest rate environment, the Bank benefits from the effect of the interest rate gap. The Bank estimates that the effect of the interest rate gap during 2001 was the generation of $18.6 million of interest income as interest rates declined over 235 basis points in 2001. Interest income generated by available capital funds is sensitive to market interest rates, as capital funds are used to finance mostly short-term interest earning assets, which are priced based on LIBOR. During 2001, interest rates declined over 235 basis points in relation to 2000, resulting in $34.0 million of interest income generated on available capital funds, compared to $51.2
32
million in 2000. One-time interest income and adjustments include interest received on loans which have been classified as non-accruing and the reversal of accrued interest when assets are classified as non-accruing. The following table sets forth information regarding net interest income for the periods indicated below.
In 2001, the net interest spread increased to 1.32% from 1.14% in 2000 and from 1.30% in 1999. The decrease in the net interest spread during 2000 in relation to 1999 was mostly attributable to lower lending margins. The increase in the net interest spread during 2001 in relation to 2000 was mostly attributable to the positive effect of lower interest rates on the Banks interest rate gap.
In 2001, the net interest margin decreased to 2.00% from 2.24% in 2000 and 2.15% in 1999. The decline of 24 basis points in the net interest margin for 2001 compared to 2000 was mainly due to: (i) lower interest rates which generated a lower return on the Banks available capital funds, but at the same time had a positive effect on the Banks interest rate gap, resulting in a negative effect of 14 basis points on the net interest margin; (ii) lower net lending margins, which had a negative effect of 4 basis points on the net interest margin; and (iii) the reversal of accrued interest on certain loans and investments classified as non-accruing loans and impaired investments net of interest income received related to such loans and investments, which had a negative effect of 6 basis points on the net interest margin.
During 2000, the net interest margin increased 9 basis points compared to 1999 (from 2.15% in 1999 to 2.24% in 2000). This increase was mainly due to: (i) lower net lending margins resulting from lower demand and improved risk perception of the largest countries in the Region, which had a negative effect of 23 basis points on the net interest margin; (ii) a higher equity to debt ratio combined with higher interest rates, which generated a higher return on the Banks available capital funds, resulting in a positive effect of 25 basis points on the net increase in the net interest margin; and (iii) one time interest income and adjustments, which had a positive effect of 6 basis points on the increase in the net interest margin. The one time interest income constituted $1.7 million of interest income received during 2000 related to an impaired/cash basis asset and an adjustment to interest income of $0.5 million made during the first quarter of 2000 that corresponded to interest income from the third and fourth quarters of 1999.
Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Common Stockholders Equity; Interest Rates and Differentials
The following table presents for the periods indicated the distribution of consolidated average assets, liabilities and common stockholders equity as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from average interest-earning assets and the resulting yields, and the dollar amounts of interest expense and average interest-bearing liabilities, and corresponding information regarding rates. Non-accruing loans are included in the calculation of the average balance of loans and interest not accrued is excluded. Average balances have been computed on the basis of consolidated daily average balance sheets.
33
Average Balance Sheet Assets, Liabilities andCommon Stockholders Equity and Interest Income and Expense
Changes in Net Interest Income Volume and Rate Analysis
Net interest income is affected by changes in volume and changes in rates. Volume changes are caused by differences in the level of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Rate changes result from differences in yields earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The following table sets forth a summary analysis of changes in net interest income of the Bank resulting from changes in average interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability balances (volume) and changes in average interest rates for 1999 compared to 2000 and for 2000 compared to 2001. Volume and rate variances have been calculated based on movements in average balances over the period and changes in interest rates on average interest-earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities. Variances caused by changes in both volume and rate have been allocated equally to volume and rate.
34
Provision for Loan Losses
During 2001, the Bank provisioned $77.1 million to the allowance for loan losses, compared to $8 million in 2000. The higher provision for loan losses was mostly related to the Banks exposure in Argentina. The Bank has decided to increase the allowance for loan losses substantially, as described under Key Information Risk Factors Regional Conditions, also related to its exposure in Argentina. The Bank makes an allowance for loan losses resulting from an impaired loan by comparing the net present value of the expected cash flows from the loan discounted at the effective interest rate of the loan and the carrying value of the loan. The Bank also maintains a loan loss reserve which is estimated using a provisioning matrix model and other factors. See Information on the Company Business Overview Loan Portfolio Allowance for Credit Losses. Although the Bank believes that its allowance for credit losses will be adequate to cover all known losses in its credit portfolio, there can be no assurance that the provisions will be adequate to cover any further increase in the amount of impaired loans or any further deterioration in its impaired loan portfolio. During 2001, the Bank identified impaired loans in Argentina in the amount of $97 million. See Key Information Risk Factors Regional Economic Conditions.
Commission Income
The Banks commission income decreased by 2% from $26.5 million in 1999 to $25.9 million in 2000 and by 42% to $14.9 million in 2001. The decline of $10.9 million in commission income during 2001, as compared to 2000, resulted from (i) the decreased volumes and margins in letter of credit confirmations and guarantees issued (covering both commercial and sovereign risk), income from which declined by $6.8 million or 32% compared to 2000; and (ii) the adoption of SFAS 133 on January 1, 2001, pursuant to which the Bank stopped amortizing the $1.9 million remaining unamortized premium received on certain options sold in 1997 (which was transferred to the SFAS 133 transition adjustment), which resulted in commission income being reduced by $1.5 million in 2001 compared to 2000 (see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk and Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements). During 2001, the sale of assets was concentrated more in securities available for sale rather than loans, and the income generated from these sales is reported under gains on sale of securities available for sale. The following table shows the components of commission income for the periods set forth below:
35
Derivatives and Hedging Activities
Effective January 1, 2001, the Bank adopted SFAS 133 relating to accounting for financial instruments that are considered to be derivatives. Pursuant to SFAS 133, these financial instruments are booked on the balance sheet at their fair value. The positive change in fair value of derivatives and hedging activities from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001 was $7.4 million, of which options represented $4.4 million and interest rate swaps $2.9 million. The amount of options outstanding at December 31, 2001 was $100 million and the final maturity of these options is in August 2002. See Note 19 (Impact of SFAS 133 on the Banks Financial Statements) of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Impairment Loss on Securities
During 2001, the Bank classified $50 million of Argentine securities (which are part of the Banks credit portfolio) as impaired. Any security that declines in value, which is deemed other than a temporary decline, is classified as impaired. These impaired Argentine securities were written down to their estimated fair value resulting in a charge of $40.4 million to earnings for 2001. See Note 5 (Investment Securities) of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Gains on Sale of Securities Available for Sale
From time to time, the Bank purchases debt instruments with the intention of selling them as part of its credit portfolio lending activity and classifies these debt instruments as securities available for sale. During 2001, the Bank generated income in the amount of $4.8 million from the sale of these securities available for sale.
Net Revenues
Net revenues (net interest income and commission income less commission expense plus derivatives and hedging activities plus other income) for the year ended December 31, 2001 grew 6% compared to the year ended December 31, 2000. The following table shows the components of net revenues for the periods set forth below:
36
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses were $26.4 million in 2001 compared to $21.2 million in 2000 and $16.6 million in 1999. Total operating expenses increased as a percentage of average total assets from 0.32% in 1999 to 0.42% in 2000 and to 0.44% in 2001. The increases in operating expenses in 1999 and 2000 were primarily due to normal salary increases and the provision for performance-based bonuses for employees. The increase in operating expenses during 2001 was due to continuing investments in technology, strategic additions to personnel, expenses associated with our new representative offices, the structured transaction unit in New York and consulting fees related to business initiatives. To support the Banks growth initiatives and become more efficient and effective in serving its customers during 2001, the Bank invested in technology including the following: the renovation of its core banking computer application; the creation of decision support applications for loan pricing and client segmentation; the renovation of computer centers and the computer network, and the acquisition of additional servers for information and decision support systems. This investment strategy is designed to exploit Internet technologies by creating a software and hardware web enabled infrastructure. The Bank engaged in an internal reorganization of human resources to align personnel with business processes, operations and technology in a more efficient manner.
Salaries and other employee expenses (including provision for performance-based bonuses for employees) were the largest component of operating expenses in 1999, 2000 and 2001, amounting to $9.6 million, $10.6 million and $11.8 million, respectively. The second largest component of operating expenses was professional services, which amounted to $1.3 million, $3.9 million and $3.1 million in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively. The third largest component of operating expenses in 2000 and 2001 was pre-operating cost, which amounted to $0.9 million and $3.0 million in 2000 and 2001, respectively. The Banks remaining operating expenses consist of communications, maintenance and repairs, rent of office space and equipment and other miscellaneous expenses. In the past, the Banks ability to maintain its low cost structure has been a significant factor in its profitability. For the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, the Banks efficiency ratio (total operating expenses divided by the sum of net interest income plus commission income) was 11.9%, 15.3% and 19.7%, respectively.
Net Income
The Banks net income was $2.5 million in 2001 compared to $97.1 million in 2000 and $101.1 million in 1999. In 2001, net income decreased by 97% from 2000. The Banks results were affected by a $77.1 million increase in the Banks allowance for loan losses and the $40.4 million impairment loss on certain securities with Argentine exposure in the fourth quarter of 2001. See Risk Factors Regional Economic Conditions and Information on the Company Business Overview Loan Portfolio Allowance for Credit Losses, Impaired Assets and Allowance for Credit Losses.
Foreign Exchange Risk Management
The Bank accepts deposits and raises funds principally in United States dollars, makes loans mostly in United States dollars and presents its consolidated financial statements in United States dollars.
Whenever possible, foreign-currency-denominated assets are funded with liability instruments denominated in the same currency. In cases where these assets are funded in different currencies, forward foreign exchange or cross-currency swap contracts are used to fully hedge the risk resulting from this cross-currency funding.
Interest rate swaps less set-offs, with maturities from May 1, 2002 to November 17, 2003, are matched to the maturity dates of related Euro medium-term note issuances and to corresponding assets held to maturity as part of the Banks credit portfolio.
The Bank also engages in some foreign exchange trades to serve customer transaction needs, and all positions are hedged with an offsetting contract in the same currency. The Bank manages the risks on these buy
37
and sell foreign currency contracts under approved limits of amounts and terms for each counterparty, and by having adopted policies that do not allow it to maintain open positions. Interest rate swaps are made either in a single currency or cross-currency for a prescribed period to exchange a series of interest rate flows, either fixed for floating rate or vice versa. See the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk and Information on the Company Business Overview Regulation.
Critical Accounting Policies Allowance for Loan Losses
Net income for 2001 declined $95 million compared to 2000, mostly due to higher provisions to the allowance for loan losses. During 2001, the Bank provisioned $77.1 million to the allowance for loan losses, which represented an increase of $69 million compared to the allowance made for 2000. The additional provision for loan losses was mostly related to the Banks exposure in Argentina.
The Bank makes allowances for loan losses resulting from an impaired loan by comparing the net present value of the expected cash flows from the loan discounted at the effective interest rate of the loan and the carrying value of the loan. The Bank also maintains a loan loss reserve which is estimated using a provisioning matrix model and other factors. See Information on the Company Business Overview Loan Portfolio Allowance for Credit Losses. Although the Bank believes that its allowance for loan losses (to be increased as described under Risk Factors Regional Economic Conditions) will be adequate to cover all known losses in its credit portfolio and is in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that the provisions made in 2001 and 2002 will be adequate to cover any further increase in the amount of impaired loans or any further deterioration in its impaired loan portfolio. The Bank stops accruing interest on a loan once it has been identified as impaired. The Bank also reverses against earnings any interest receivable accrued and unpaid on a loan at the time it is identified as impaired.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Liquidity refers to the Banks ability to maintain adequate cash flows to fund operations and meet obligations and other commitments on a timely basis. It is the opinion of the Banks management that the Banks working capital is sufficient for the Banks present liquidity requirements. The Bank maintains its liquid assets in demand deposits, overnight funds and time deposits with well-known international banks. These liquid assets are adequate to cover 24-hour deposits from customers, which theoretically could be withdrawn on the same day. The Banks 24-hour deposits from customers (overnight deposits, demand deposit accounts and call deposits) generally total 3% of total deposits. At December 31, 2001, 24-hour deposits amounted to $71.1 million. Additionally, the Bank has approximately $76 million to $94 million of time deposits maturing daily. The liquidity requirement resulting from these maturities is met by the Banks liquid assets, which at December 31, 2001 were $559 million, and by daily maturities of approximately $12 million to $26 million in the Banks loan portfolio.
At December 31, 2001, BLADEX had a total liquidity position of $559 million, which represented 9% of total assets. BLADEXs overall objective is to have a minimum of 50% of its liquidity position represented by demand, call accounts and time deposits with maturities of less than one week invested in overnight deposits with the balance invested in (i) short-term time deposits with maturities of up to six months, (ii) investment funds (see Information on the Company Business Overview Investments) or (iii) negotiable money market instruments, such as Euro certificates of deposit, commercial paper, bankers acceptances and other liquid instruments with maturities of up to 180 days. These instruments must be of investment grade quality (carrying two of the following ratings: A-1, P-1 or F-1 from Standard & Poors, Moodys or Fitch, respectively) and must have a liquid secondary market. Interbank deposits are with reputable international banks, considered by management to be of high quality, located outside of the Region. These banks must have a correspondent relationship with BLADEX and be approved by the Board of Directors on an annual basis. The primary
38
objectives for the investment of BLADEXs liquidity funds are security and convertibility and the secondary objective is yield. In order to manage its liquidity needs and risks, BLADEXs liquidity position is reviewed and monitored on a daily basis by management.
The average loan portfolio declined by $501 million in 1999 as compared to 1998, increased by $569 million in 2000 and decreased by $193 million in 2001. The net decrease in cash flows due to deposits for the year ended December 31, 1999 was $88.8 million. The net increase in cash flows due to deposits for the year ended December 31, 2000 was $126.7 million. The net decrease in cash flows due to deposits for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $172.5 million. In 1999 and 2000, the Banks cash flow generated by short-term borrowings and placements declined by $362.7 million and $11.1 million, respectively. In 2001, the Banks cash flow generated by short-term borrowings and placements increased by $313.4 million. During 1999, the Banks cash flow generated by medium and long-term borrowings and placements declined by $57.0 million, and increased by $369.9 million and $204.7 million during 2000 and 2001, respectively.
Deposits as a percentage of total liabilities decreased from 36% at December 31, 1999 to 35% at December 31, 2000 and to 30% at December 31, 2001. At December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, short-term and medium-term borrowings and placements accounted for 61%, 63% and 68%, respectively, of total liabilities. Short-term and medium-term borrowings and placements were important sources of funding for the Banks loan portfolio because they permitted the Bank to diversify its sources of funding outside of the Region, and because the Bank utilized these borrowings and placements, which generally had longer maturities than deposits, to help manage its asset and liability positions.
The Banks loan and investment portfolio is primarily short-term. At December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, 80%, 63% and 61%, respectively, of the Banks loan portfolio (loans plus selected investment securities held to maturity and available for sale plus securities purchased under agreements to resell) had an average term left to maturity of 365 days or less. While the Banks liabilities generally mature over shorter periods than its assets, requiring the Bank to renew or create new liabilities at current interest rates, the associated risk is diminished by the short-term nature of the loan portfolio. At December 31, 2001, $431 million of the loan portfolio (9% of the total) matured within 30 days, $832 million (18% of total loan portfolio) matured within 90 days, $987 million (21% of total loan portfolio) matured within 180 days and $737 million (16% of total loan portfolio) matured within one year. At December 31, 2001, the average original term to maturity of the Banks short-term loan portfolio was approximately 242 days.
Interest-Bearing Deposits in Other Banks
The following table shows short-term funds deposited with other banks by principal geographic area at the dates indicated below.
Funding Sources
The Banks principal sources of funds are deposits, borrowed funds and floating and fixed rate placements. While these sources are expected to continue to provide most of the funds needed by the Bank in the future, their mix, as well as the possible use of other sources of funds, will depend upon future economic and market conditions.
39
At December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, short-term and medium-term borrowings and placements represented 61%, 63% and 68%, respectively, of total liabilities. The Bank also relies mostly upon inter-bank deposits for funding, which at December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001 represented 36%, 35% and 30%, respectively, of total liabilities.
Funds raised by the Bank are used primarily to provide trade-related loans to its customers. In 1999, loans plus selected investments (which were bought as part of the Banks credit portfolio activity) plus securities purchased under agreements to resell decreased by $501 million. In 2000 and 2001, loans plus selected investments held as part of the credit portfolio plus securities purchased under agreements to resell increased by $569 million and $59 million, respectively. A portion of the funds raised is used to maintain a certain level of liquidity held in cash and due from banks and interest bearing-deposits in other banks, which at December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001 totaled $402 million, $314 million and $559 million, respectively.
The Bank obtains deposits principally from central and commercial banks in the Region. Approximately 60% of the deposits held by the Bank are deposits made by central banks of countries in the Region. Many of these banks deposit a portion of their dollar reserves with the Bank. The average term remaining to maturity of deposits from central banks of countries in the Region at December 31, 2001 was 74 days as compared to 78 days at December 31, 2000. The bulk of the Banks remaining deposits is obtained from commercial banks in the Region. At December 31, 2001, deposits from the Banks five largest depositors, all of which were central banks in the Region, constituted 40% of the Banks total deposits.
Deposits
The principal components of the Banks customer deposits are demand and time deposits. The following table analyzes the Banks deposits by country at December 31 of each year set forth below:
40
Short-Term Borrowings & Placements
As of December 31, 2001, the Bank had short-term borrowings and placements outstanding of $1,823 million. The Banks short-term borrowings consist of borrowings from banks and borrowings through issuance of commercial paper and certificates of deposit. The Banks short-terms borrowings from banks, which totaled $1,735 million at December 31, 2001, have maturities of up to 365 days and are made available to the Bank on an uncommitted basis for the financing of trade-related loans. These short-term borrowings are provided by approximately 80 European and North and Latin American banks. Commercial paper and certificate of deposit issuances, which totaled $73 million at December 31, 2001, are made under the Banks Euro-Commercial Paper and Certificate of Deposit Program. The maximum amount of notes and certificates of deposit authorized to be issued under this program is $750 million and the maximum term of the notes and certificates of deposit issued thereunder is 365 days. Notes issued at a discount and interest bearing certificates of deposit may both be issued under this program in various hard currencies.
The short-term debt securities placements include floating and fixed rate notes with maturities of up to 365 days issued under the Banks EMTN Program (as defined below). The maximum amount of notes authorized to be issued under this program is $2.25 billion. See Medium and Long-Term Floating and Fixed Rate Placements.
The average original term remaining to maturity of the short-term borrowings and placements at December 31, 2001 was approximately 204 days. At December 31, 2001, 34% of all short-term borrowings and placements were due within 30 days, 25% were due within 31-90 days, 24% were due within 91-180 days and the balance were due prior to the end of the year 2002. The Banks short-term borrowings and placements provided matched funding for 34% of the Banks total loan portfolio (loans plus selected investments plus securities purchased under agreements to resell), and played an important role in controlling the gap between assets and liabilities and in helping to minimize the impact of short-term interest rate fluctuations. See Liquidity. The following table presents information regarding the amounts outstanding under, and interest rates on, the Banks short-term borrowings and placements at the dates and during the periods indicated.
41
Medium and Long-Term Debt
The Bank, at December 31, 2001, had $1,108 million of syndicated and other medium-term borrowings from various international banks. The interest rates on most medium and long-term borrowings are adjusted semi-annually using the six-month LIBOR plus a credit spread. The Bank uses these funds to finance its medium-term loan portfolio. The average original term remaining to maturity of the Banks medium and long-term debt is 2.5 years.
Medium and Long-Term Floating and Fixed Rate Placements
The Bank has a Euro Medium Term Note Program (the EMTN Program) which has a maximum limit of $2.25 billion. Notes issued under the EMTN Program are placed in Asia, Europe and North America, in either the Eurodollar or 144A markets, and are general obligations of the Bank. The EMTN Program may be used to issue notes with maturities ranging from 90 days up to a maximum of 30 years, at fixed or floating interest rates and in various hard currencies. The sale of notes issued under the EMTN Program is generally made through one or more authorized financial institutions. As of December 31, 2001, the total amount outstanding under this program with medium-term maturities was $679 million, of which $396 million was at floating interest rates and $283 million at fixed interest rates. As part of its interest rate and currency risk management, the Bank enters into foreign exchange forward and cross currency contracts and interest rate swaps to hedge the risk associated with a portion of the notes issued under its EMTN Program. See Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.
The interest rate on all currently outstanding floating rate notes issued under the EMTN Program is adjusted quarterly or semi-annually using the applicable LIBOR rate. The weighted average interest cost of these placements at the end of 2001 was 3.16%, and the placements had final maturities in 2002 through 2006.
As of December 31, 2001, the Bank had fixed rate placements outstanding of $283 million under the EMTN Program with maturities in 2002 through 2005. The weighted average interest cost of these fixed rate placements at the end of 2001 was 5.73%.
Cost and Maturity Profile of Borrowed Funds and Floating and Fixed Rate Placements
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the weighted average cost and the remaining maturities of the Banks borrowed funds and floating and fixed rate placements at December 31, 2001.
42
At December 31, 2001, the Bank had no material commitments for capital expenditures.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following tables set forth information regarding the Banks contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2001.
Asset/Liability Management
The Bank seeks to manage its assets and liabilities to reduce the potential adverse impact on net interest income that might result from changes in interest rates. Risk control on interest rates is conducted through systematic monitoring of maturity mis-matches. The Banks investment decision-making takes into account not only the rates of return and their underlying degree of risk, but also liquidity requirements, including minimum cash reserves, withdrawal and maturity of deposits and additional demand for funds. For any given period, a matched pricing structure exists when an equal amount of assets and liabilities are repriced. An excess of assets or liabilities over these matched items results in a gap or mis-match, as shown in the table under Interest Rate Sensitivity below. A negative gap denotes liability sensitivity and normally means that a decline in interest rates would have a positive effect on net interest income, while an increase in interest rates would have a negative effect on net interest income. Substantially all of the Banks assets and liabilities are denominated in dollars and, therefore, the Bank has no material foreign exchange risk.
43
In 1996, the Bank established an Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) with the purpose of monitoring and managing the interest rate gap of the Bank and coordinating lending and funding activities to optimize profits and reduce interest rate risk.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
The following table presents the projected maturities and interest rate adjustment periods of the Banks assets, liabilities and common stockholders equity based upon the contractual maturities and adjustment dates at December 31, 2001. The interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities of the Bank and the related interest rate sensitivity gap given in the following table may not be reflective of positions in subsequent periods.
The Banks interest rate risk arises from the Banks liability sensitive position in the short-term, which means that the Banks interest-bearing liabilities reprice more quickly than the Banks interest-earning assets. Consequently, there is a potential adverse impact on the Banks net interest income that might result from changes in interest rates. The Banks interest rate risk is managed by attempting to match the term and repricing characteristics of the Banks interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. The Banks policy with respect to interest rate gaps provides that the gap between short-term interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities on a cumulative basis at 90 days cannot exceed 200% of the Banks total capital. On a cumulative basis at 180 days, the gap cannot exceed 100% of the Banks total capital. The Banks policy with respect to interest rate gaps also provides that the Bank is to match fund interest-earning assets over 365 days, as discussed above. The Bank also uses interest rate swaps on a limited basis as part of its interest rate risk management. These interest rate swaps are made either in a single currency or cross-currency for a prescribed period to exchange a series of interest rate flows, which involve fixed for floating rate interest payments.
44
Foreign Exchange Sensitivity
The Bank accepts deposits and raises funds principally in United States dollars, and makes loans mostly in United States dollars. At December 31, 2001, the Banks total non-dollar financial liabilities constituted 1.95% of total liabilities and consisted exclusively of hard currencies. The Banks total non-dollar loans and investments constituted 2.9% of total assets and consisted mostly of Yen-denominated loans. The Banks currency risk results from the potential impact of changes in exchange rates on foreign currency exposures. The Bank manages this risk by not holding open foreign exchange positions. The Bank uses foreign exchange forward contracts as part of its management of currency risks. Most of the Banks forward exchange contracts are made by the Bank as end-user to hedge foreign exchange risks arising from the issuance of non-dollar denominated short-term Euro commercial paper and medium and long-term Euro medium-term notes, and from making non-dollar denominated short and medium-term loans. The Bank also engages in some foreign exchange trades to serve customers trade transaction needs, and all positions are hedged with an offsetting contract in the same currency. The Bank manages the risks on these buy and sell foreign currency contracts by establishing limits relating to the amounts and terms of these instruments for each counterparty, and by having adopted policies that do not allow the Bank to maintain open positions. For quantitative information on derivative financial instruments relating to the Banks foreign exchange market risk, see Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and for further information on foreign exchange risk, see Note 2(j) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Also, see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.
Trend Information
During the first five months of 2002, the Bank continued to operate under difficult operating conditions in the Latin American region and a weak global economy. The deterioration of the Argentine economy, reflecting four years of economic recession, and the current crises, have adversely affected the financial condition of the Banks Argentine obligors, including banks and corporations, and the quality of the Banks loans to those obligors. In response, the Bank has put in place a pragmatic collection program to manage its Argentine exposure. The Banks multilateral status, confirmed by the Central Bank of Argentina at the end of February 2002, exempts the Bank from limitations on the convertibility and transfer abroad of U.S. dollars for payment of external obligations, thereby contributing to the on-going efforts of this program.
Even with the benefit of the Banks confirmed multilateral status, given the continued severity of the Argentine crises, the Bank believes that it will have to renegotiate and restructure loans, and that it will also face write-offs in its Argentine portfolio. In the absence of any clarity about the timing or nature of resolving the many issues facing the country, the Banks management and Board of Directors have determined to take a conservative position relative to the Banks credit portfolio in Argentina.
After careful consideration, and based upon rigorous analysis of all the relevant factors, the Banks Board of Directors has determined to further increase the allowance for credit losses and impairment losses on securities
45
to approximately $510 million, of which approximately $420 million will relate to its Argentine portfolio. The exact amount of this increase, and the corresponding charge against earnings, will be determined prior to and announced in connection with the release of the Banks second quarter results scheduled for late July or early August 2002.
As part of this decision, the Bank is formulating a comprehensive strategy, with the assistance of financial advisors, designed to address the Banks capital and funding needs following the contemplated increase of the credit loss allowance for Argentina. This strategy will include a plan to recapitalize the Bank with additional equity capital. The Bank has retained BNP Paribas Securities Corp. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. as financial advisors to assist with this process. The Bank and its advisors are coordinating with the Banks credit rating agencies, multilateral organizations and public sector shareholders, in formulating this recapitalization plan.
The Bank believes that these steps will adequately address the likely impact of the Argentine situation on the Banks loan portfolio and that the Bank will remain in a strong financial position. There can be no assurance, however, that the Bank will be successful in executing any recapitalization plan or that the political and economic situation in Argentina will not deteriorate further and require additional action.
The crisis in Argentina and downgrades by the rating agencies have affected the Banks funding activity. Deposits declined 52% during the first five months of 2002 and the international debt markets were closed for medium term placements. This factor combined with weak loan demand resulted in a 30% decline in the credit portfolio during this period. During the first quarter of 2002, the major rating agencies downgraded the Banks credit rating due to the crisis in Argentina and its potential impact on the Banks credit exposure in that country.
The Bank follows a conservative liquidity management strategy and in view of the volatility in the Region began gradually increasing its net cash position in the second quarter of 2001, reaching a level of approximately $600 million in January 2002, which has been maintained since that time. At May 31, 2002, liquidity levels amounted to $592 million compared to $314 million at December 31, 2000. At May 31, 2002, the Banks net cash position represented almost 80% of total deposits. There is no assurance that a further deterioration of the Argentine situation or difficulties in other countries in the Region where the Bank has large exposures will not trigger further downgrades in the Banks credit ratings below investment grade ratings, which would adversely affect the Banks cost of funds, its deposit base and accessibility to the debt capital markets.
A lower interest rate environment during the first five months of 2002 generated a lower return on the Banks available capital funds invested in liquid assets. Because returns on funds invested in liquid assets impact net income (see Operating Results Net Interest Income), a continued trend of lower interest rates in the markets in which the Bank invests its funds would adversely affect the Banks net income in the future.
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees
Directors and Senior Management
Directors
The following table ses forth certain information concerning the Directors of the Bank as of the date of this Annual Report, including information with respect to each persons current position with the Bank and with other institutions, country of citizenship and the year that each Directors term expires.
46
47
Rubens Amaral has served as Managing Director and General Manager for North America of Banco do Brasil, New York Branch since 2000. Mr. Amaral has been employed by Banco do Brasil in various capacities since 1975, holding the positions of Managing Director, International Division and alternate member of the board of directors in 1998, Executive General Manager of the International Division in Sao Paulo from 1994 to 1998, Deputy General Manager in the New York branch in charge of the Trade Finance & Correspondent Banking Department, Head of Staff of the International Division from 1993 to 1994 and Advisor, Head of Department and General Manager in the Trade Finance Area at the International Division Head Office, from 1989 to 1993. Mr. Amaral also served as a representative for the Central Bank of Brazil from 1982 to 1988 in banking supervision.
Guillermo Güémez García has served as Deputy Governor of Banco de Mexico since 1995 and served as Vice Chairman and President of the Executive Committee in Grupo Azucarero Mexico of Grupo de Embotelladoras Unidas, S. A. de C. V. from 1993 to 1994. He served on the Mexican Business Coordinating Council for Nafta in the capacity of Executive Director from 1991 to 1993. He was employed by Banco Nacional de Mexico in various capacities from 1974 to 1990, including holding the position of Executive Vice President for International Products from 1986 to 1990. Mr. Güémez García was the founder and served as President of Euromex Casa de Cambio and Euroamerican Capital Corporation from 1986 to 1990. He has held the positions of Executive Vice President of International Treasury and Foreign Exchange, Exchange Controls and Ficorca from 1982 to 1986, as well as International Operations from 1984 for Banco Nacional de Mexico. He was a representative in London and set up the Banco Nacional de Mexicos branch in London from 1979 to 1981 and was the Manager for Foreign Currency Funding and International Credits from 1974 to 1978. Mr. Güémez García was employed by the Bank of America in Mexico, as an Assistant Representative in 1973 and from 1964 to 1972 he worked in the construction and cement industry.
Miguel Gómez M., since 1998, has served as President of Banco de Comercio Exterior de Colombia, S. A. Bancoldex. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Gómez served as Executive President of the Colombian Association of Flower Exporters Asocolflores and as President of Verdesarrollo S. A. (Economical Adviser) from 1996 to 1997. He was employed by Controloría General de la Republica as the Vice-Comptroller of the Republic from 1994 to 1996. Mr. Gómez was Dean of the Faculty of Economy at the Universidad del Rosariofrom 1993 to 1994 and was the Economics Advisor of the Minister, General Director for the Development of the Interchange and Secretary of the Superior Counsel of Foreign Commerce for the Ministry of Foreign Commerce from 1992 to 1993. He has also served as Economical Manager and International Manager of the Colombian Association of Flower Exporters -Asocolflores-, Economical Manager and International Manager from 1990 to 1992, General Secretary and Presidents Assistant of Computec S. A., from 1988 to 1990 and as Director of the International Section and Editor of Sintesis Economica from 1986 to 1987.
Ernesto Bruggia has served as General Manager of Banco de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (BPBA) since 1999 and as General Manager of Grupo BAPRO (holding company of BPBA), since November 1998. Mr. Bruggia has been employed by BPBA in various capacities since 1976, including; as Assistant General Manager from 1993 to 1999, as Finance Manager and International Relations from 1992 to 1993, as International Operations Manager from 1990 to 1992, as Deputy Manager in charge of International Operations from 1989 to 1990, as Deputy Manager in charge of the International Division in 1985 and as Chief of International Audit in 1983. Mr. Bruggia began his career with Banco de la Provincia de Buenos Aires in 1976 in its Stock Exchange Department.
Valentín Hernández, since 1992, has served as Financial Institutions Division Executive for Latin America, Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Indian sub-continent at Citibank, N.A., New York. Mr. Hernández has been employed by Citibank, N.A. in various capacities since 1976, including serving as Department Head for marketing and operations for Sub-Sahara Africa and the Middle East in New York, from 1984 to 1992. He handled marketing responsibilities for India, Australia, and Sub-Sahara Africa from 1982 to 1984 and served as Relationship Manager in the Mortgage and Real Estate Group in Venezuela from 1976 to 1982 at Citibank, N.A. Thereafter, he served as the Financial Institutions Country Head for Venezuela.
48
Will Wood has served as the founding principal of Kentwood Associates of Menlo Park, California since 1993. Mr. Wood was employed by Wells Fargo in the International Banking Group and served as an Executive Vice President from 1986 to 1989. While at Wells Fargo, he was a Director of the Bankers Association for Foreign Trade and PEFCO, a privately owned export finance company. Mr. Wood was employed by Crocker Bank and served as Executive Vice President in charge of the International Division and Manager of the Latin America Area from 1975 to 1986. He worked for Citibank in La Paz, Bolivia, Lima, Peru, Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo, Brazil and began his career with Citibanks Overseas Division in 1964 in New York.
Sebastiao Toledo Cunha has served as Managing Director of the International Area at Banco Santos S.A., New York, since March 2002. Mr. Cunha served as Vice President and General Manager of Banque Sudameris, Miami, Florida, from 2000 to 2001 and as Director Superintendente (CEO) for Banco Sudameris Brasil, S. A., from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Cunha was employed by Banco Real, in various capacities, including; as Executive Director responsible for International and Foreign Exchange Operation, from 1990 to 1998, as Regional Director for European Sector from 1988 to 1990 in London, as General Manager of the International Department, in Sao Paulo from 1986 to 1987, as Deputy Regional Director London Branch, in charge of the European and African Markets from 1980 to 1986, as responsible for the opening of Banque Real de Cote DIvore, Ivory Coast, as Managing Director from 1977 to 1980, and as Manager of the International Division from 1975 to 1977.
Mario Covo was the founding partner and has served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fin@ccess International Inc. since 1999. He was the founder of Columbus Advisors and Columbus Group and served in such capacity from 1995 to 1999. Mr. Covo was employed by Merrill Lynch, as Managing Director heading the Latin America Capital Markets Group from 1989 to 1995. Previously, he was employed by Bankers Trust Company, as a Vice President in the Latin American Merchant Banking Group, focusing on corporate finance and debt-for-equity swaps from 1985 to 1989. He was employed as an International Economist for Chase Econometrics, focusing primarily on Venezuela and Colombia, from 1984 to 1985.
José Castañeda has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since November 1989. He was employed by Banco Río de la Plata, New York, as Manager and Agent from July 1987 to September 1989. Mr. Castañeda was employed by Citibank, N.A., Argentina, as Vice President/Head of the Financial Institutions Group from 1984 to 1987 and by Banco de Crédito del Peru, New York as General Manager from 1982 to 1984. He also served as Vice President for Crocker National Bank, San Francisco, CA, from 1979 to 1982 and was employed by Citibank, N.A., Lima, Peru, as Manager Government and Financial Institutions Group from 1968 to 1979.
Gonzalo Menéndez Duque has served as Director of Banco de Chile since 2001. He has also served as a Director of several companies related to Grupo Luksic, including; Banedwards Compañía de Seguros de Vida, Banchile Corredores de Bolsa, Cia. Nacional de Teléfonos, Telefónica del Sur and Telefónica de Coyhaique since 2000, Grupo Minero Antofagasta Minerals since 1997, Holdings Quiñenco, Minera Michilla, Fundaciones A. Luksic and P. Baburizza since 1996, and Antofagasta Plc, England since 1985. Mr. Duque was a Director of Banco Edwards from 1999 to 2001, Banco Santiago from 1993 to 1999 and Grupo Financiero OHCH from 1996 to 1999. He was also the Chief Executive Officer of the following companies: Empresas Lucchetti, S.A. from 1994 to 1998, Banco OHiggins from 1985 to 1992 and Antofagasta Group from 1980 to 1985.
Senior Management
Executive Officers
The following table and information sets forth the names of the executive officers of the Bank and their respective positions as of the date hereof and positions held by them with the Bank and other entities in prior years:
49
José Castañeda has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Bank since November 1989. He was employed by Banco Río de la Plata, New York, as Manager and Agent from July 1987 to September 1989. Mr. Castañeda was employed by Citibank, N.A., Argentina, as Vice President/Head of the Financial Institutions Group from 1984 to 1987 and employed by Banco de Crédito del Peru, New York as General Manager from 1982 to 1984. He also served as Vice President for Crocker National Bank, San Francisco, CA, from 1979 to 1982 and was employed by Citibank, N.A., Lima, Peru, as Manager Government and Financial Institutions Group from 1968 to 1979.
Jaime Rivera has served as the Chief Operating Officer of the Bank since March 2002. Previously, Mr. Rivera was employed by the Bank of America in various capacities since 1978, including; as Managing Director, Latin America Financial Institutions, Miami from 1998 to 2002, as Managing Director of the Latin America Corporate Finance team, New York From 1995 to 1998, as Managing Director/General Manager Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil from 1990 to 1995, as General Manager Argentina & Uruguay, Buenos Aires, Argentina, from 1989 to 1990, as Marketing and Credit Manager Chile, Santiago, Chile, from 1986 to 1989, as General Manger Guatemala, Guatemala City, from 1982 to 1986, as Information Systems Division Manger, Caracas, Venezuela, from 1980 to 1982, and as an Account Officer Central America & Caribbean, Guatemala City, Guatemala, from 1978 to 1980.
Miguel Moreno has served as Senior Vice President, Comptroller of the Bank since September 2001. He was a partner and Information Technology Consulting Manager for PriceWaterhouse, Bogotá, Colombia from 1988 to 2001 and served as Vice President of Information Technology and Operations for Banco de Credito, Bogotá, Colombia from 1987 to 1988. Mr. Moreno served as Chief Executive Officer, TM Ingeniería, Bogotá, Colombia, from 1983 to 1987 and as Chief Executive Officer, ICDS Ltd., Bogotá, Colombia, from 1982 1987. He was the Head of the Industrial Engineering Department, Los Andes University, Colombia from 1982 to 1984. Mr. Moreno was employed by SENA, Organization and Systems Office and Planning Consulting, Colombia from 1977 to 1981 and worked for the Finance and Public Credit Ministry of Colombia, as Advisor to the Minister from 1976 to 1977.
Christopher E. D. Hesketh has served as Senior Vice President, Treasury of the Bank since September 1989. He was employed by Yamaichi International America, Inc. as Vice President, Corporate Finance Department, in New York from 1986 to 1989. Mr. Hesketh was previously employed by Manufacturers Hanover Overseas Corporation, New York, in various capacities since 1980, including; Regional Credit Manager, New
50
York from 1985 to 1986, Credit Director, Madrid, Spain from 1982 to 1985, and Assistant Credit Manager of Manufacturers Hanover Leasing Corporation, New York from 1980 to 1982. He was employed by Barclays Bank International, in various capacities from 1974 to 1980, in Spain and London.
Haydeé A. de Cano has served as Senior Vice President, Administration and Human Resources of the Bank since 2001. Ms. de Cano previously served as Senior Vice President, Administration, of the Bank from 1992 to 2001 and as Vice President of Human Resources, Organization and Methods from 1980 to 1992. Prior to her employment by the Bank, she held industrial engineer positions at the Autoridad Portuaria Nacional, Reed Management Consulting Group, Aseguradora Mundial and Cerveceria Nacional from 1974 to 1979.
Carlos Yap S. has served as Vice President, Finance and Performance Management of the Bank since 1993. Prior to this position, Mr. Yap worked for the Bank in the departments of Institutional Planning, Treasury, Correspondent International Banking and Capital Markets from 1980 to 1993. Prior to his employment by the Bank, Mr. Yap worked for Banco Nacional de Panama in its Credit Department from 1979 to 1980, Azucarera Nacional, S.A. and the Panama Canal Company from 1977 to 1979.
Miguel Kerbes has served as Vice President, Risk Management of the Bank since September 2000. He was the Assistant Credit Director for the Southern Cone Area of Banco Santander Chile from 1995 to 2000. Mr. Kerbes also served as the Head of Credit Division at Banco Boston Chile from 1992 to 1995 and was employed by ING Bank in various capacities from 1982 to 1992.
Joaquín Uribe has served as Vice President, Processes, Technology and Operations of the Bank since September 2001 and previously served as Vice President of Operations and Technology, Consumer Banking Technology for Citibank, Colombia from 1997 to 2001. Mr. Uribe held the positions of Senior Analyst, Project Manager and Information Systems Manager for UNISYS Corporation, Colombia, from 1987 to 1997. Mr. Uribe was a Professor, served as the Director of the Data Processing Center and was a Senior Analyst for The Colombian School of Engineering from 1981 to 1987.
Compensation
The aggregate amount of compensation paid by the Bank during the year ended December 31, 2001 to the executive officers of the Bank as a group for services in all capacities, including compensation paid pursuant to the Banks bonus plan, was $1,950,180. The Banks bonus plan was established by the Board of Directors, in accordance with a performance-based compensation scheme. On an annual basis, the Board of Directors approves the bonus amount that will be awarded to each of the Banks executive officers and employees based on the achievement of goals established at the institutional level. All employees participate in the bonus plan based on their performance at the departmental and individual level. At December 31, 2001, the total amount set aside or accrued by the Bank to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for employees was $1,988,832. During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Bank granted a total number of 37,750 stock options under its stock option plans (see Share Ownership below) to the executive officers of the Bank as a group.
On April 28, 2000, the Board of Directors approved a compensation plan for non-employee Directors (the Compensation Plan) under which such non-employee Directors are eligible to receive compensation both in the form of cash and in the form of stock options to purchase Class E shares. With respect to the cash component of compensation, each non-employee Director is eligible to receive an annual amount of up to $20,000 for his services as a director and an additional amount of $2,500 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended. With respect to the stock option component of compensation, each non-employee Director is eligible to receive options to purchase Class E shares under a stock option plan authorized by the Board of Directors on April 28, 2000 (the Board Plan), as more fully described below. The Chairman of the Board of Directors is eligible to receive an additional fifty- percent (50%) of the compensation that other directors are eligible to receive under the Compensation Plan with respect to the cash component and the stock option component of compensation. The aggregate amount of compensation in cash paid by the Bank during the year ended December 31, 2001 to the directors of the Bank as a group for their services as Directors was approximately $377,500.
51
Pursuant to the Board Plan, each year the Board of Directors may grant options to each non-employee Director to purchase Class E shares of the Bank. The aggregate number of Class E shares that may be issued upon exercise of options under the Board Plan is 50,000. If options are granted under the Board Plan in any calendar year, the Chairman of the Board of Directors will receive options to purchase shares that have an aggregate value of $15,000 on the date of grant and each other Director will receive options to purchase shares that have an aggregate value of $10,000 on the date of grant. The exercise price for all options under the Board Plan will be equal to the fair market value of a Class E share on the date of grant. Directors will fully vest in their options on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and such options may be exercised at any time thereafter, up to the fifth anniversary of the date of grant. All Directors must pay the exercise price in cash, except that the Board of Directors may determine, in its discretion, to allow payment of the exercise price in Class E shares. Except in the case of death or disability, all unvested options of a grantee will be forfeited upon the termination of such grantees services as a Director of the Bank. As of May 31, 2002, stock options with respect to 2,584 Class E shares had been granted by the Board of Directors under the Board Plan at an exercise price of $32.88 per Class E share. The Board of Directors granted all of these stock options on February 6, 2001. As of the date hereof, none of the stock options granted by the Board of Directors under the Board Plan have been exercised. In accordance with the Board Plan, options on 304 Class E shares expired during 2001 (and may be reissued) as a result of the expiration of the term of a Director.
Board Practices
The Board of Directors consists of ten members (each, a Director) in accordance with the Banks Articles of Incorporation. Pursuant to an amendment to the 2000 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation approved by the holders of the Banks common stock at the Banks 2002 Annual Meeting, the total number of members of the Board of Directors was increased on April 16, 2002 from nine (9) Directors to ten (10) Directors. Consequently, the Board of Directors currently consists of three (3) Class A Directors, two (2) Class B Directors, three (3) Class E Directors and two (2) Directors representing the holders of all classes of shares of the Banks common stock. Members of the Board of Directors are elected at annual meetings of stockholders of the Bank and each Director serves a term of three years. The terms of office of the Directors are staggered in order to provide for continuity on the Board of Directors. In the elections of Directors representing a class of shares of the Banks common stock, the votes of the holders of such class of shares are counted separately as a class. The holders of each class of common stock have cumulative voting rights with respect to the election of Directors representing such class.
Pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation if on the first working day of each year, starting from the year 2001, the number of Class B shares is lower than 20%, but equal or higher than 10%, of the total of all issued and outstanding shares as a result of their conversion into Class E shares, the holders of Class B shares will lose the right to elect one (1) Director. If this occurs, the holders of Class E shares will acquire the right to appoint an additional Director. Furthermore, if on the first working day of each year beginning with the year 2001, the amount of Class B shares outstanding is lower than 10% of the total of all issued and outstanding shares, the holders of Class B shares will lose the right to elect Directors and the holders of Class E shares will acquire the right to appoint a second additional Director. At May 31, 2002, the amount of Class B shares represented 22.16% of the total of all issued and outstanding shares.
The following table sets forth the names and countries of citizenship of the Banks dignatarios as of the date hereof, their current office or position with other institutions, and their current office or position with the Bank. Dignatarios are elected annually by the members of the Board of Directors. Dignatarios attend meetings of the Board of Directors, participate in discussions and offer advice and counsel to the Board of Directors, but do not have the power to vote (unless they are also Directors of the Bank).
52
Audit Committee
The members of the Audit Committee (created pursuant to the powers granted to the Board of Directors under the Banks Articles of Incorporation) are Sebastiao Toledo Cunha, Valentín Hernandez, Mario Covo and Ernesto Bruggia (who serves as Chairman). The Audit Committee met three times in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001. Included among the oversight functions of the Audit Committee are: (i) the recommendation of the Banks independent auditors for appointment by the stockholders of the Bank; (ii) review of the Banks external audit plan and the results of the auditing engagement of the Banks independent auditors; (iii) review of the internal audit plan and the results of the Banks internal audits; and (iv) review of the adequacy of the Banks system of internal controls.
Based on reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 be included in the Banks Annual Report.
The aggregate amount of fees paid by the Bank to its independent auditors for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of the Bank for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 was approximately $182,049.
Certain Directors also serve on the other committees established by the Board of Directors, including the Credit Committee, the Technology Committee and the Personnel Committee.
The Bank does not have any Directors service contracts providing for benefits upon termination of their appointment.
The Banks Personnel Committee among other functions, performs the functions of a remuneration committee. The members of the Personnel Committee are Will Wood (who serves as Chairman), Ernesto Bruggia, Guillermo Güemez and Miguel Gómez.
Advisory Council
The Advisory Council was created by the Board of Directors in April 2000 pursuant to the powers granted to the Board of Directors under the Banks Articles of Incorporation. The duties of the members of the Advisory Council consist primarily of providing advice to the Board of Directors and management with respect to
53
the business of the Bank in their areas of expertise. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, the Advisory Council met twice.
Each member of the Advisory Council receives $5,000 for each Advisory Council meeting attended. The aggregate amount of fees paid by the Corporation during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 for services rendered by the Advisory Council during 2001 was approximately $55,000.
The following table sets forth the names of the members of the Advisory Council of the Bank as of the date hereof and certain other information.
Employees
As of December 31, 1999 and 2000, the total number of permanent employees of the Bank was 187 and 197, respectively. As of December 31, 2001, the total number of permanent employees was 215, which were geographically distributed as follows: Head Office in Panama:189; New York Agency 8; BLADEX Securities, LLC 7; Representative Office in Argentina 3; Representative Office in Brazil 4; and Representative Office in Mexico 4.
Share Ownership
On October 13, 1995, the Board of Directors adopted a stock option plan (the 1995 Stock Option Plan) authorizing the Bank to grant to eligible executive officers and employees stock options on up to 300,000 Class E shares. The 1995 Stock Option Plan provides that options may be granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Class E shares on the date of the grant of the option. On October 1, 1999, the Board of Directors adopted another stock option plan (the 1999 Stock Option Plan) authorizing the Bank to grant to eligible executive officers and employees stock options on up to 350,000 Class E shares. The 1999 Stock Option Plan provides that options may be granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Class E shares on the date of the grant of the option. Participants in the 1999 Stock Option Plan who remain employed will
54
become fully vested in their options four years from the date of grant. Options granted under both the 1995 Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Stock Option Plan remain outstanding for a period of 10 years unless sooner forfeited.
The following table sets forth information regarding the stock options granted under the 1995 Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Stock Option Plan since the inception of these plans. Each exercise price listed below is equal to the fair market value of the Class E shares on the dates on which the options related thereto were granted under the plans.
As of May 31, 2002, 62,766 Class E shares have been purchased through the exercise of stock options granted under the 1995 Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Stock Option Plan.
In 1999, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of two employee stock programs. These programs were implemented in the year 2001 and have the following terms:
55
As of the date hereof, an aggregate number of 122 and 4,308 deferred equity units, representing the right to acquire the same number of Class E shares or the economic equivalent thereof, have been granted to eligible employees of the Bank under the DEU Plan and the DC Plan, respectively. As of the date hereof, no deferred equity units granted under the DEU Plan or the DEC Plan have vested.
As of March 31, 2002, the Banks executive officers, Directors and advisory council members, as a group, owned an aggregate of 49,826 Class E shares, which was less than 0.7% of all issued and outstanding Class E shares.
The following tables set forth information regarding the number of shares owned by the Banks executive officers and Directors and options and rights held under each of the DEU Plan, the DC Plan, the 1995 Stock Option Plan, the 1999 Stock Option Plan and the Board Plan as of May 31, 2002.
56
The exercise prices of the options granted to the executive officers listed above under the 1995 Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Stock Option Plan are set forth below.
For additional information regarding stock options granted to executive officers and Directors, see Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions
Major Shareholders
As of the date hereof, the Bank is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or any foreign government, and no person is the registered owner of more than 7% of the total outstanding shares of voting capital stock of the Bank.
57
The following table sets forth information regarding the Banks shareholders that are the beneficial owners of 5% or more of any one class of the total outstanding shares of voting capital stock of the Bank, at May 31, 2002:
All common shares have the same rights and privileges regardless of their class, except that: (i) the affirmative vote of three-quarters (3/4) of the issued and outstanding Class A shares is required (A) to dissolve and liquidate the Bank, (B) to amend certain material provisions of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, (C) to merge or consolidate the Bank with another entity and (D) to authorize the Bank to engage in activities other than those described as the purposes of the Bank in its Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation; (ii) the Class E shares and the preferred shares are freely transferable, while the Class A shares and Class B shares can only be transferred to qualified holders; (iii) the Class B shares may be converted into Class E shares; (iv) the holders of Class A shares and Class B shares benefit from pre-emptive rights, but the holders of Class E common shares do not; and (v) the classes vote separately for their respective Directors.
Prior to the approval of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation at the 2000 Annual Meeting, the holders of the Class C shares and the Class D shares had the right to convert up to 100% of their Class C shares or Class D shares into Class E shares at a conversion rate of ten (10) Class C shares or ten (10) Class D shares for nine (9) Class E shares. From 1998 through 2000, a total of 300,420 Class C shares were converted into 270,377 Class E share. During 1998 and 1999, two holders of Class C shares representing 6.3% and 6.7%, respectively, of the total amount of all Class C shares outstanding converted their holdings into Class E shares. During 2000, a total of 417,133 Class B shares were converted into 417,128 Class E shares.
As of May 31, 2002, there were no Class A shares held by institutions located in the United States. At May 31, 2002, 3.9% of the total Class B shares outstanding were held by institutions located in the United States, representing 0.9% of the Banks total common shares. Because a majority of Class E shares are held by or in the
58
name of the Depository Trust Company, the Bank does not have precise information regarding Class E shareholders in this regard.
Related Party Transactions
Certain directors of the Bank are executive officers of banks and/or other financial institutions located in Latin America, the Caribbean and elsewhere. Some of these banks and/or other financial institutions own shares of the Banks common stock and have entered into loan transactions with the Bank in the ordinary course of business. The terms and conditions of such loan transactions, including interest rates and collateral requirements, are substantially the same as the terms and conditions of comparable loan transactions entered into with other persons under similar market conditions.
The consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income included in the Consolidated Financial Statements include information pertaining to transactions with related parties (shareholder banks and their affiliates), including the amounts of such transactions. See Note 3 to the Notes of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 8. Financial Information
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
See Item 19.
Dividends
Prior to December 2000, the Board of Directors declared and paid dividends to holders of both common stock and preferred stock on an annual basis. The Board of Directors, at a meeting held on February 4, 2000, declared an annual dividend of $1.25 per common share, an increase of 30% compared to $0.96 paid in 1999. This dividend was payable on March 3, 2000 to shareholders of record as of February 18, 2000. The aggregate amount of the common stock dividend declared was approximately 26% of BLADEXs reported net income for 1999, after payment of preferred stock dividends. On April 28, 2000, the Board of Directors approved a one time special dividend of $1.25 per common share payable on May 29, 2000 to shareholders of record as of May 11, 2000. The Board of Directors also declared a special cash dividend of $2.26 per preferred share, payable in two equal installments on May 15, 2000 and November 15, 2000 to preferred stockholders of record as of April 28, 2000 and October 31, 2000, respectively.
On December 6, 2000, the Board of Directors approved an increased dividend payout ratio and a plan to declare and pay dividends on a quarterly basis, rather than annually. The Bank intended through these actions to improve shareholder value while continuing to invest in the Banks growth. The Board of Directors approved a target dividend payout ratio of 40% of net income. The Banks cash dividend payout ratio has generally been close to 25% of the prior years net income. The application of the new target dividend payout ratio of 40% of net income and the quarterly declaration and payment of dividends began in the first quarter of 2001.
The Board of Directors, at a meeting held on February 5, 2001, declared a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per common share. This dividend was payable on March 5, 2001 to stockholders of record as of February 22, 2001. At the same meeting, the Board of Directors also declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.84 per preferred share, payable in two equal installments on May 15, 2001 and November 15, 2001 to preferred stockholders of record as of February 22, 2001 and October 31, 2001, respectively.
The Board of Directors, at a meeting held on April 26, 2001, declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.47 per common share. This dividend was payable on May 29, 2001 to stockholders of record as of May 18, 2001. At the same meeting, the Board of Directors also declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.84 per preferred share, payable on May 15, 2001 to preferred stockholders of record as of April 30, 2001.
59
The Board of Directors, at a meeting held on July 23, 2001, declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.47 per common share. This dividend was payable on August 30, 2001 to stockholders of record as of August 20, 2001. At the same meeting, the Board of Directors also declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.84 per preferred share, payable on August 14, 2001 to preferred stockholders of record as of July 31, 2001.
The Board of Directors, at a meeting held on November 9, 2001, declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.47 per common share. This dividend was payable on December 6, 2001 to stockholders of record as of November 23, 2001. At the same meeting, the Board of Directors also declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.84 per preferred share, payable on December 20, 2001 to preferred stockholders of record as of December 6, 2001.
On February 5, 2002, the Board of Directors suspended dividends on common shares, believing that it is in the best interests of shareholders to conserve the Banks capital resources until the probable outcome of the Banks exposure to Argentina is more clear.
Significant Changes
There has not been any significant change since December 31, 2001. The impact of the future adoption of the SFAS 141, 142, 143 and 144 is not expected to have a material effect on the Banks financial statements.
Item 9. The Offer and Listing
Offer and Listing Details
On October 1, 1992, the Bank concluded a public offering in the United States of 4,000,000 Class E shares with no par value. On December 22, 1994, the Bank concluded another offering of 3,200,000 Class E shares. The Class E shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BLX. The following table shows the high and low sales prices of the Class E shares on the New York Stock Exchange for the periods indicated.
60
Markets
The Banks Class A shares and Class B shares were sold in private placements, are not listed on any exchange and are not publicly traded. The Banks Class E shares, which constitute the only class of shares publicly traded, represent approximately 47% of the total shares of the Banks common stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 2001.
Item 10. Additional Information
Memorandum and Articles of Association
BLADEX is a Bank organized under the laws of the Republic of Panama, registered in the Mercantile Section (Persons) of the Public Registry of the Republic of Panama at file card 021666, roll 1050, image 0002. Article 2 of BLADEXs Articles of Incorporation states that the purpose of the Bank is to promote the economic development of Latin American countries, mainly by promoting foreign trade. For the attainment of this purpose, the Bank may: (1) establish a Latin American credit system for the export of goods and services, which shall include granting direct export loans, including financing the stages prior to and after export; (2) foster a market for bank acceptances extended as a result of operations pertaining to the export of goods of Latin American origin; (3) promote the establishment of a Latin American system of export credit insurance and mechanisms that may supplement existing national systems; (4) collaborate with Latin American countries in conducting market research, with a view to promoting their exports of goods and services; and (5) generally engage in any kind of banking or financial business intended to promote the development of Latin American countries. The Articles of Incorporation provide that BLADEX may also engage in activities other than those described above, provided that it has obtained the approval of the shareholders in a resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of one-half (1/2) plus one of the common shares, either present or represented, in a meeting of shareholders called to obtain such authorization, which affirmative vote shall necessarily include the vote of three-fourths (3/4) of Class A shares issued and outstanding.
BLADEXs Articles of Incorporation provide that the Board of Directors shall direct and control the business and assets of the Bank, except for those matters specifically reserved to shareholders by law or the Articles of Incorporation. The Board of Directors may, however, grant general and special powers of attorney, authorizing directors, officers and employees of the Bank or other persons to transact such business and affairs within the competence of the Board of Directors, as the Board of Directors may deem convenient to entrust to each of them. The Articles of Incorporation of BLADEX do not contain provisions limiting the ability of the Board of Directors to approve a proposal, arrangement or contract in which a Director is materially interested, or a provision which limits the ability of the Board of Directors to fix the compensation of its members, a provision which requires the mandatory retirement of a Director at any prescribed age or a provision which requires that a certain number of shares be owned by a person to qualify as a Director.
The Board of Directors consists of ten (10) members, as follows: three (3) Directors are elected by the holders of the Class A shares; two (2) Directors are elected by the holders of the Class B shares; three (3)
61
Directors are elected by the holders of the Class E shares; and two (2) Directors are elected by the holders of all of the common shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if due to the conversion of Class B shares, the number of outstanding shares of this class falls below certain percentages prescribed in the Articles of Incorporation, holders of Class B shares may lose the right to elect any member of the Board of Directors.
The Directors are elected by shareholders for periods of three (3) years and they may be re-elected. The holders of the Class A, Class B and Class E shares vote separately as a class for the election of the Directors of the Bank representing such class. For the election of Directors, the shareholders of each class have a number of votes equal to the number of shares of such class held by the shareholder multiplied by the number of Directors to be elected by such class, and the shareholder may cast all of the votes in favor of one candidate or distribute them among all the Directors to be elected or among two or more of them, as the shareholder may decide.
All common shares have the same rights and privileges regardless of their class, except that: (i) the affirmative vote of three-quarters (3/4) of the issued and outstanding Class A shares is required (A) to dissolve and liquidate the Bank, (B) to amend certain material provisions of the Articles of Incorporation, (C) to merge or consolidate the Bank with another entity and (D) to authorize the Bank to engage in activities other than those described as the purposes of the Bank in its Articles of Incorporation; (ii) the Class E shares and the preferred shares are freely transferable, while the Class A shares and Class B shares can only be transferred to qualified holders; (iii) the Class B shares may be converted into Class E shares; and (iv) the holders of Class A shares and Class B shares benefit from pre-emptive rights, but the holders of Class E shares do not; and (v) the classes vote separately for their representative directors.
Preferred shares receive a minimum annual preferred dividend of 8% per annum to be declared by the Board of Directors and to be paid, as any other dividend, in semiannual or quarterly installments, as prescribed by the Board of Directors. The Bank may not pay any dividend in cash for common shares in any fiscal year until it has paid the minimum preferred dividend corresponding to preferred shareholders in that year or in any other previous year in which the aggregate total dividend corresponding to preferred shares has not been paid. In the event that the Bank fails to pay the aggregate total amount of the minimum preferred dividend corresponding to preferred shares in a given fiscal year, and during the following two years fails to pay the aggregate total amount of the minimum preferred dividend corresponding to preferred shares in those two following years, as well as the amount which it had failed to pay in respect of such first year, or if the Bank fails to make any payment to the sinking fund or fails to redeem any preferred shares, and provided always that at the time of the occurrence of any of the above such preferred shares represent at least ten percent (10%) of the total paid in capital of the Bank, the holders of preferred shares shall be entitled to elect a member of the Board of Directors, who shall continue in office until the circumstances from which his appointment has arisen cease to exist. Preferred shares have no voting rights, except for the election of a Director in the event mentioned above. Preferred shares have no preemptive rights under Article 6 of the Articles of Incorporation.
The rights of the holders of the common shares may be changed by an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Bank. Amendments to the Articles of Incorporation may be adopted by the affirmative vote of one-half plus one of the common shares represented at the respective meeting, except for the following amendments which require, in addition, the affirmative vote of three-quarters (3/4) of all issued and outstanding class A shares: (i) any amendment to the Banks purposes or powers, (ii) any amendment to the capital structure of the Bank and the qualifications to become a holder of any particular class of shares, (iii) any amendment to the provisions relating to the notice, quorum and voting at shareholders meetings, (iv) any amendment to the composition and election of the Board of Directors, as well as notices, quorum and voting at meetings of Directors, (v) any amendments to the powers of the Chief Executive Officer of the Bank and (vi) any amendments to the fundamental financial policies of the Bank.
The Articles of Incorporation of BLADEX provide that there will be a general meeting of holders of the common shares every year, on such date and in such place as may be determined by resolution of the Board of Directors, to elect Directors and transact any other business duly submitted to the meeting by the Board of Directors. In addition, holders of the common shares shall hold extraordinary meetings when called by the Board
62
of Directors, as it may deem necessary. The Board of Directors or the President of the Bank must call an extraordinary meeting of holders of the common shares when requested in writing by one or more holders of common shares representing at least one-twentieth (1/20) of the issued and outstanding capital. Notice of meetings of shareholders, whether ordinary or extraordinary, are personally delivered to each registered shareholder or sent by fax, telex, courier, air mail or any other means authorized by the Board of the Directors, at least 30 days before the date of the meeting, counted from the date that the notice is sent. The notice of the meeting must include the agenda of the meeting. At any meeting of shareholders, shareholders may be represented by a proxy who need not be a shareholder, and who may be appointed by public or private document, with or without power of substitution. Whenever the holders of the preferred shares are entitled to vote pursuant to the Articles of Incorporation, a meeting of the holders of the preferred shares shall be called by the President of the Bank as soon as possible. Upon request to the Board of Directors or the President of the Bank, shareholders representing at least one-twentieth (1/20) of the issued and outstanding shares of any given class may hold a meeting separately as a class for the purpose of considering any matter which, in accordance with the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation and the By-laws, is within their competence. In order to have a quorum at any meeting of shareholders, it is required that one-half plus one of the common shares issued and outstanding be represented at the meeting. Whenever a quorum is not obtained at a meeting of shareholders, the meeting shall be held on the second meeting date set forth in the notice of the meeting with the common shares represented on such second meeting date. All resolutions of shareholders shall be adopted by the affirmative vote of one-half plus one of the common shares represented at the meeting where the resolution was adopted, except for those cases mentioned above that require a super-majority vote.
Class A shares may only be issued as registered shares in the name of any of the following entities in Latin American countries: (i) central banks, (ii) banks in which the State is the majority shareholder or (iii) other government agencies. Class B shares may only be issued in the name of banks or financial institutions. Class E shares and preferred shares may be issued in the name of any person, whether a natural person or a legal entity.
Article 11 of the Articles of Incorporation of BLADEX establishes that the adoption of resolutions approving the merger or consolidation of BLADEX with another entity requires the affirmative vote of one-half plus one of the common shares represented at the meeting plus three-quarters (3/4) of all issued and outstanding class A common shares.
Neither BLADEXs Articles of Incorporation nor its By-laws contains any provision requiring that any disclosure be made with respect to the ownership of any shareholder above an ownership threshold.
There are no conditions imposed by the Articles of Incorporation governing changes in capital which are more stringent than required by Panamanian law.
Material Contracts
The Bank has not entered into contracts outside the ordinary course of business during the two-year period immediately preceding the date of this Annual Report.
Exchange Controls
There are currently no Panamanian restrictions on the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls, and no restrictions on the payment of dividends or interest, nor are there limitations on the rights of foreign stockholders to hold or vote stock.
Taxation
The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal and Panamanian tax matters that may be relevant with respect to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Class E shares. Prospective purchasers of Class E shares should consult their own tax advisors as to the United States, Panamanian or other tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Class E shares.
63
This summary does not address the consequences of the acquisition, ownership or disposition of the Banks Class A shares or Class B shares.
United States Taxes
This summary describes the principal United States federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of the Class E shares sold in the 1992 and 1994 offerings, but does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to holders of Class E shares. This summary applies only to current and subsequent holders that hold or will hold, respectively, Class E shares as capital assets and does not address classes of holders that are subject to special treatment under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), such as dealers in securities, financial institutions, tax-exempt entities, life insurance companies, persons holding Class E shares as part of a hedging, constructive ownership or conversion transaction or a straddle, holders whose functional currency is not the dollar, or a holder that owns 10% or more of the voting shares of the Bank.
This summary is based upon the Code existing, temporary and proposed regulations promulgated thereunder, judicial decisions and administrative procurements, as all in effect on the date of this Annual Report and which are subject to change (possibly on a retroactive basis) and to differing interpretations. Purchasers or holders of Class E shares should consult their own tax advisors as to the United States federal, state and local, and foreign tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of Class E shares in their particular circumstances.
As used herein, a U.S. Holder refers to a holder of Class E shares that is, for United States federal income tax purposes, (i) an individual citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation organized or created in or under the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation without regard to the source of its income, (iv) a trust, if both (A) a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and (B) one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or a trust that has made a valid election under U.S. Treasury Regulations to be treated as a domestic trust, and (v) any holder otherwise subject to United States federal income taxation on a net income basis with respect to Class E shares (including a non-resident alien individual or foreign corporation that holds, or is deemed to hold, any Class E share in connection with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business). In the case of a holder of Class E shares that is a partnership for United States tax purposes, each partner will take into account its allocable share of income, gain or loss from the Class E shares, and will take such income, gain or loss into account under the rules of taxation applicable to such partner, taking into account the activities of the partnership and the partner.
Taxation of Distributions
Subject to the Passive Foreign Investment Company Status discussion below, to the extent paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits of the Bank as determined under United States federal income tax principles (earnings and profits), distributions made with respect to Class E shares (other than certain pro rata distributions of capital stock of the Bank or rights to subscribe for shares of capital stock of the Bank) will be includable in income of a U.S. Holder as ordinary dividend income in accordance with the U.S. Holders regular method of accounting for U.S. federal tax purposes whether paid in cash or Class E shares. To the extent that a distribution exceeds the Banks earnings and profits, such distribution will be treated, first, as a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holders tax basis in the Class E shares and will reduce the U.S. Holders tax basis in such shares, and thereafter as a capital gain from the sale or disposition of Class E shares. See Taxation United States Taxes Taxation of Capital Gains. The amount of the distribution will equal the gross amount of the distribution received by the U.S. Holder, including any Panamanian taxes withheld from such distribution.
Distributions made with respect to Class E shares out of earnings and profits generally will be treated as dividend income from sources outside the United States. U.S. Holders that are corporations will not be entitled to
64
the dividends received deduction under Section 243 of the Code with respect to such dividends. Subject to certain conditions and limitations, Panamanian tax withheld from dividends will be treated as a foreign income tax eligible for deduction from taxable income or as a credit against a U.S. Holders U.S. federal income tax liability. Distributions of dividend income made with respect to Class E shares generally will be treated as passive income or, in the case of certain U.S. Holders, financial services income, for purposes of computing a U.S. Holders U.S. foreign tax credit.
Less than 25 percent of the Banks gross income is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States, and the Bank expects this to remain true. If this remains the case, a holder of Class E shares that is not a U.S. Holder (a non-U.S. Holder) generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax or withholding tax on distributions received on Class E shares that are treated as dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Special rules may apply in the case of non-U.S. Holders (i) that are engaged in a U.S. trade or business, (ii) that are former citizens or long-term residents of the United States, controlled foreign corporations, foreign personal holding companies, corporations which accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, and certain foreign charitable organizations, each within the meaning of the Code, or (iii) certain non-resident alien individuals who are present in the United States for 183 days or more during a taxable year. Such persons should consult their own tax advisors as to the United States or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of Class E shares.
Taxation of Capital Gains
Gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or other disposition of Class E shares will be subject to United States federal income tax as capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. Holders tax basis in the Class E shares and the amount realized on the disposition. Such gain will be treated as long-term capital gain if the Class E shares are held by the U.S. Holder for more than one year at the time of the sale or other disposition. Otherwise, the gain will be treated as a short-term capital gain. Gain realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or other disposition of Class E shares generally will be treated as U.S. source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes, unless the gain is attributable to an office or fixed place of business maintained by the U.S. Holder outside the United States or is recognized by an individual whose tax home is outside the United States, and certain other conditions are met. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, capital losses are subject to limitations on deductibility. As a general rule, U.S. Holders that are corporations can use capital losses for a taxable year only to offset capital gains in that year. A corporation may be entitled to carry back unused capital losses to the three preceding tax years and to carry over losses to the five following tax years. In the case of noncorporate U.S. Holders, capital losses in a taxable year are deductible to the extent of any capital gains plus ordinary income of up to $3,000. Unused capital losses of noncorporate U.S. Holders may be carried over indefinitely.
A non-U.S. Holder of Class E shares will generally not be subject to United States federal income tax or withholding tax on gain realized on the sale or other disposition of Class E shares. Special rules may apply in the case of non-U.S. Holders (i) that are engaged in a U.S. trade or business, (ii) that are former citizens or long-term residents of the United States, controlled foreign corporations, foreign personal holding companies, corporations which accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, and certain foreign charitable organizations, each within the meaning of the Code, or (iii) certain non-resident alien individuals who are present in the United States for 183 days or more during a taxable year. Such persons should consult their own tax advisors as to the United States or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the Class E shares.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Status
Under the Code, certain rules apply to an entity classified as a passive foreign investment company (PFIC). A PFIC is defined as any foreign (i.e., non-U.S.) corporation if either (i) 75% or more of its gross income for the taxable year is passive income (generally including, among other types of income, dividends, interest and gains from the sale of stock and securities) or (ii) 50% or more of its assets (by value) produce, or are
65
held for the production of, passive income. The Code provides an exception for foreign institutions in the active conduct of a banking business, provided the institution is licensed to do business in the United States. Under Proposed Regulations, the exception is for active banks licensed by federal or state regulatory authorities to do business as a bank in the United States, provided the foreign bank is not prohibited from taking deposits or making loans. Based on its current and intended method of operations as described herein, the Bank believes that it is not a PFIC under current U.S. federal income tax law because it is eligible for the exception available to U.S. licensed banks in the Code and the proposed regulations. The Bank intends to continue to operate in a manner that will entitle the Bank to rely upon that exception to avoid classification as a PFIC.
If the Bank were to become a PFIC for purposes of the Code, unless a U.S. Holder makes the election described below, a U.S. Holder generally will be subject to a special tax charge with respect to (a) any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of Class E shares and (b) any excess distribution by the Bank to the U.S. Holder (generally, any distributions including return of capital distributions, received by the U.S. Holder on the Class E shares in a taxable year that are greater than 125 percent of the average annual distributions received by the U.S. Holder in the three preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, the U.S. Holders holding period). Under these rules (i) the gain or excess distribution would be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holders holding period for the Class E shares, (ii) the amount allocated to the current taxable year would be treated as ordinary income, (iii) the amount allocated to each prior year would be subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for that year; and (iv) the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such prior year. For purposes of the foregoing rules, a U.S. Holder of Class E shares who uses such stock as security for a loan will be treated as having disposed of such stock.
If the Bank were a PFIC, U.S. Holders of interests in a holder of Class E shares may be treated as indirect holders of their proportionate share of the Class E shares and may be taxed on their proportionate share of any excess distributions or gain attributable to the Class E shares. An indirect holder also must treat an appropriate portion of its gain on the sale or disposition of its interest in the actual holder as gain on the sale of Class E shares.
If the Bank were to become a PFIC, a U.S. Holder could make an election, provided the Bank complies with certain reporting requirements, to have the Bank treated, with respect to such U.S. Holder, as a qualified electing fund (hereinafter referred to as a QEF election), in which case, the electing U.S. Holder would be required to include annually in gross income the U.S. Holders proportionate share of the Banks ordinary earnings and net capital gains, whether or not such amounts are actually distributed. If the Bank were to become a PFIC, the Bank intends to so notify each U.S. Holder and to comply with all reporting requirements necessary for a U.S. Holder to make a QEF election and will provide to record U.S. Holders of Class E shares such information as may be required to make such QEF election.
If the Bank is a PFIC in any year, a U.S. Holder who beneficially owns Class E shares during such year must make an annual return on Internal Revenue Service Form 8621, which describes the income received (or deemed to be received if a QEF election is in effect) from the Bank. The Bank will, if applicable, provide all information necessary for a U.S. Holder of record to make an annual return on Form 8621.
A U.S. Holder that owns certain marketable stock in a PFIC may elect to mark-to-market such stock and, subject to certain exceptions, include in income any gain (increases in market value) or loss (decreases in market value to the extent of prior gains recognized) realized as ordinary income or loss to avoid the adverse consequences described above. U.S. Holders of Class E shares are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the consequences of owning stock in a PFIC and whether such U.S. Holder would be eligible to make either of the aforementioned elections to mitigate the adverse effects of such consequences.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Each U.S. payor making payments in respect of Class E shares will generally be required to provide the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) with certain information, including the name, address and taxpayer identification number of the beneficial owner of Class E shares, and the aggregate amount of dividends paid to
66
such beneficial owner during the calendar year. Under the backup withholding rules, a holder may be subject to backup withholding at a current rate of 30% with respect to proceeds received on the sale or exchange of Class E shares within the United States by non-corporate U.S. Holders and to dividends paid, unless such holder (i) is a corporation or comes within certain other exempt categories (including securities broker-dealers, other financial institutions, tax-exempt organizations, qualified pension and profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts), and, when required, demonstrates this fact or (ii) provides a taxpayer identification number, certifies as to no loss of exemption and otherwise complies with the applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Non-U.S. Holders are generally exempt from information reporting and backup withholding, but may be required to provide a properly completed Form W-8BEN (or other similar form) or otherwise comply with applicable certification and identification procedures in order to prove their exemption. This backup withholding tax is not an additional tax and any amounts withheld from a payment to a holder of Class E shares will be refunded (or credited against such holders U.S. federal income tax liability, if any) provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.
There is no income tax treaty between Panama and the United States.
Panamanian Taxes
The following summary of certain Panamanian tax matters is based upon the tax laws of Panama and regulations thereunder in effect as of the date of this Annual Report and is subject to any subsequent change in Panamanian laws and regulations that may come into effect after such date. The principal Panamanian tax consequences of ownership of Class E shares are as follows:
Generally
Panamas income tax is exclusively territorial. Only income actually derived from sources within Panama is subject to taxation. Income derived by Panamanian or foreign corporations or individuals from offshore operations is not taxable. The territorial principle of taxation has been in force throughout the history of the country and is supported by legislation, administrative regulations and court decisions.
The Bank is not subject to income taxes in Panama pursuant to a special exemption granted by the government of Panama under Law 38 enacted on July 25, 1978. In addition, even in the absence of such special legislation, under Panamanian law banks are not subject to income tax on their offshore income. Since the Banks loans are primarily made outside Panama, the Bank would have limited tax liability even in the absence of special legislation.
Dividends and distributions paid by the Bank in respect of its shares are also exempt from withholding tax under the aforementioned special legislation. If such special legislation did not exist, Panama would impose a 10% withholding tax on dividends or distributions paid in respect of the Banks registered shares (20% in respect of the Banks bearer shares), to the extent such dividends are paid from income derived by the Bank from Panamanian sources.
Inasmuch as almost all of the Banks income derives from non-Panamanian sources, capital gains realized by an individual or corporation, regardless of its nationality or residency, on the sale or other disposition outside of Panama of Class E shares should not be subject to taxes in Panama. However, there are no rules of allocation with respect to derivation of income currently in effect in Panama and it cannot be determined with certainty when the tax authorities would consider that a significant amount of the Banks income derives from Panamanian sources, thus resulting in the taxation of capital gains realized on the sale or disposition of the Banks Class E shares. Recently enacted legislation would help to settle uncertainties on this topic as it makes clear that capital gains realized on the sale or disposition of securities registered with the National Securities Commission of
67
Panama would not be subject to taxes in Panama, provided that the sale or disposition is made through a stock exchange or any other organized market. The Banks Class E shares are not currently registered with the National Securities Commission of Panama.
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
The information set forth in Note 17 and Note 2(j) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and in Operating and Financial Review and Prospects Liquidity, Asset/Liability Management, and Interest Rate Sensitivity are incorporated herein by reference.
The Banks risk management policies, as approved by the Banks Board of Directors from time to time, are designed to identify and control the Banks credit and market risks by establishing and monitoring appropriate limits on the Banks credit and market exposures. Certain members of the Banks Board of Directors constitute the Banks Credit Policy and Risk Assessment Committee, which meets on a regular basis and monitors and controls the risks in each specific area. At the management level, the Bank has a Risk Management Department that measures and controls the credit and market exposure of the Bank. Additionally, the Bank established ALCO (as defined in Information on the Company Asset/Liability Management) with the purpose of monitoring and managing the interest rate gap of the Bank and also to coordinate lending and funding activities in order to optimize profits and reduce interest rate and liquidity risks. ALCO consists of participants from the Credit and Marketing Department, the Treasury Department, the Risk Management Department and the Finance and Performance Management Department as well as the Chief Operating Officer.
The Banks primary market risks are comprised of liquidity risk and interest rate risk and, to a lesser extent, currency exchange risk and price risk.
The Banks liquidity risk is the risk of not being able to maintain an adequate cash flow to fund operations and meet obligations and other commitments on a timely basis. The Bank manages short-term liquidity risk by investing a minimum of 50% of the liquidity funds generated by demand, call accounts and time deposits in overnight deposits with maturities of less than one week and by investing the remaining balance in short-term time deposits with maturities of up to six months and investment funds or negotiable money market instruments, such as Euro certificates of deposits, commercial paper, bankers acceptances and other liquid instruments, with maturities of up to 180 days. See Information on the Company Investments. These instruments must be of investment grade (carrying two of the following ratings: A-1, P-1 or F-1 from Standard & Poors, Moodys Investors or Fitch IBCA, respectively) and must have a liquid secondary market. Interbank deposits are with reputable international banks located outside of the Region that usually carry ratings of A-1, P-1 or F-1 by two of the above rating agencies. These banks must have a correspondent relationship with BLADEX and be approved by the Board of Directors on an annual basis. The primary objectives for these investments are security and liquidity. In order to manage its liquidity needs, the Banks liquidity position is reviewed and monitored on a daily basis by management.
The Banks interest rate risk arises from the Banks liability sensitive position in the short-term, which means that the Banks interest-bearing liabilities reprice more quickly than the Banks interest-earning assets. Consequently, there is a potential adverse impact on the Banks net interest income that might result from changes in interest rates. The Banks interest rate risk is managed by attempting to match the term and repricing characteristics of the Banks interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. The Banks policy with respect to interest rate gaps provides that the gap between short-term interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities on a cumulative basis at 90 days cannot exceed 200% of the Banks total capital. For the period on a cumulative basis at 180 days, the gap cannot exceed 100% of the Banks total capital. The Banks policy with respect to interest rate gaps also provides that the Bank is to match fund interest-earning assets over 365 days, as discussed above. The Bank also uses interest rate swaps on a limited basis as part of its interest rate risk management. These interest rate swaps are made either in a single currency or cross-currency for a prescribed period to exchange a series of interest rate flows, which involve fixed for floating rate interest payments. For quantitative information
68
relating to the Banks interest rate risk and information relating to the Banks management of interest rate risk, see Note 17 and Note 2(j) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Effective January 1, 2001, the Bank adopted SFAS 133 relating to accounting for financial instruments that are considered to be derivatives. Pursuant to SFAS 133, these financial instruments are booked on the balance sheet at their fair value. For control purposes, these financial instruments are recorded at their nominal amount or notional amount on the memorandum accounts.
In the normal course of business, the Bank had outstanding derivative financial instruments in the following notional amounts at the dates indicated below:
Options
During the third quarter of 1997, the Bank entered into a series of put option contracts providing for guarantees to a counterparty with respect to certain assets with an aggregate face value of $221.4 million. At certain specified exercise dates, or in the event of default, the counterparty has the right to sell an underlying asset to the Bank (generally at par), if the market yield on the underlying asset exceeds the strike yield set forth in the contract. The underlying assets consist of debt issued by several sovereign borrowers in the Region for a notional value of $221.4 million. At December 31, 2001, the notional value of these outstanding options was $100 million. Provisions for possible losses on these guarantees were established in 1997 and 1998 to cover the mark-to-market valuation of the underlying assets of the options. On January 1, 2001 as a result of the adoption of SFAS 133, the allowance for losses on guarantees was eliminated and the balance of $5.0 million, together with the remaining unamortized premium received of $1.9 million, were compared to $5.6 million generated by the market valuation of options at that date, resulting in a SFAS 133 transition adjustment of approximately $1.4 million. See Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Bank utilizes derivatives and foreign exchange financial instruments for its asset/liability activities. All of the forward exchange contracts entered into during 2001 and 2000 were made by the Bank as end-user to hedge foreign exchange risks arising from the Banks lending activity and the issuance of non-dollar short-term Euro commercial paper and Euro medium-term notes. The Bank also engages in some foreign exchange trades to serve customers transaction needs and all positions are hedged with an off-setting contract in the same currency. The Bank manages and controls the risks on these buy and sell foreign currency contracts by establishing limits on amounts of such contracts and terms by clients, and by having adopted policies that do not allow it to maintain open positions. Interest rate swaps are made either in a single currency or cross-currency for a prescribed period to exchange a series of interest rate flows, which involve fixed for floating interest payments or vice versa.
Types of Derivative and Foreign Exchange Instruments
Derivative and foreign exchange instruments negotiated by the Bank are mainly executed over-the-counter (OTC). These contracts are executed between two counterparts that negotiate specific agreement terms,
69
including notional amount, exercise price and maturity. The following instruments are used by the Bank for purposes of asset/liability activities:
Interest rate swaps are contracts in which a series of interest rate flows in a single currency are exchanged over a prescribed period.
Cross-currency swaps are contracts that generally involve the exchange of both interest and principal amounts in two different currencies.
Forward foreign exchange contracts represent agreements to transact on a future date at agreed-upon terms.
Whenever possible, foreign-currency-denominated assets are funded with liability instruments denominated in the same currency. In cases where these assets are funded in different currencies, forward foreign exchange or cross-currency swap contracts are used to fully hedge the risk due to this cross-currency funding.
Quantitative information on derivative financial instruments outstanding at December 31, 2001 and 2000 are set forth below:
Remaining contracts outstanding at December 31, 2001 with notional principal amounts less set-offs are as follow:
Interest rate swaps less set-offs, with maturities from May 15, 2002 to November 17, 2003, are matched to the maturity dates of related Euro medium-term note issuances and to corresponding assets held to maturity as part of the Banks credit portfolio.
70
Fair Value Disclosure of Financial Instruments
For information regarding fair value disclosure of financial instruments, see Note 18 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Accounting and Reporting Development
Impact of SFAS 133 on the Banks Financial Statements
On January 1, 2001, the Bank adopted SFAS 133 and 138 dealing with the fair market value of all derivative instruments on the balance sheet. As of January 1, 2001, the fair market valuation of certain options and interest rate swaps increased earnings by $1 million. As of December 31, 2001, the fair market valuation of derivatives used in the Banks hedging activities added $7.4 million to earnings. The Banks capital accounts were negatively impacted by $0.5 million, relating to the mark-to-market of the cash flow hedges. The Banks policy is not to engage in hedging activities or maintain derivative positions other than routine swaps to hedge existing normal currency and interest rate positions.
The adoption of SFAS 133 affected the cumulative effect of accounting changes account and the other income account, both of which impacted the statement of income included in the Consolidated Financial Statements as follows:
Also, the adoption of SFAS 133 affected the other comprehensive income account on the Banks consolidated balance sheet as follows:
The table below lists for each of the years 2001 to 2005 the notional amounts and weighted interest rates, as of December 31, 2001, for the Banks investments, borrowings and placements, cross currency swaps and interest rate swaps.
71
72
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities
PART II
Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies
None.
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
At the 2000 Annual Meeting, shareholders approved the Articles of Incorporation. In adopting the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, the shareholders approved three significant changes thereto, including a change in the capital structure of the Banks shares of common stock. This change consolidated the Banks Class B and Class C shares into a single class represented by new Class B shares and made such new Class B shares convertible at the option of the shareholder, on a share-for-share basis, into the existing Class E shares, which trade on the New York Stock Exchange. The holders of Class B shares may at any time, and with no limitation, exchange Class B shares for Class E shares, at a rate of one (1) Class B share for one (1) Class E share. When the right of conversion is exercised, the Class B shares being exchanged will be converted into Class E shares, and the certificates representing the Class B shares will be cancelled, and in their stead new certificates representing Class E shares will be issued. The principal advantage to holders of the Banks Class B shares of converting from Class B shares to Class E shares is that the holder will own securities for which there is a more liquid trading market. Class E shares issued in exchange for Class B shares that have not been outstanding for at least two years will not (unless they are registered by the Bank under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended) be freely tradable on the New York Stock Exchange until the end of a two-year holding period, which will include the holding period of the Class B shares for which the new Class E shares are exchanged.
Prior to the approval of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation at the 2000 Annual Meeting, the holders of the Class C shares and the Class D shares had the right to convert up to 100% of their Class C shares or Class D shares into Class E shares at a conversion rate of ten (10) Class C shares or ten (10) Class D shares to nine (9) Class E shares. While this conversion program was effective, a total of fourteen holders of Class C shares converted 1,329,852 Class C shares into 1,149,979 Class E shares. During July 1996, the sole owner of the Banks Class D shares converted 919,833 Class D shares, equal to all outstanding Class D shares, into 827,847 Class E shares.
In December, 2000, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program, an increased dividend payout ratio and a plan to declare and pay dividends on a quarterly basis, rather than annually. Under the repurchase program, BLADEX may, from time to time, at the discretion of management, purchase up to an
73
aggregate of $75,000,000 of Class E shares on the open market at the then prevailing market price. BLADEX may also make one or more repurchases of up to an aggregate of $25,000,000 of Class shares in privately negotiated transactions at the then prevailing market price of the Class E shares. Any repurchases of Class A shares from a Class A shareholder may not exceed 25% of the number of shares owned by such Class A shareholder. This program was halted at the end of 2001.
Under the share repurchase program, the Bank has repurchased through December 31, 2001 1,750,505 Class E shares and 318,140 Class A shares (which are not publicly traded) for a total of $70.0 million. During 2001, the Bank paid cash dividends in the amount of $39.2 million and repurchased common shares for an aggregate amount of $64.8 million, including the repurchase of Class A shares for $9.2 million and Class E shares for $55.6 million. As of the date hereof, no shares of common stock have been repurchased by the Bank in 2002 and no dividends have been declared or paid as the Board of Directors believes that it is in the best interests of shareholders to conserve the Banks capital resources (see Risk Factors).
Item 15. (Reserved)
Item 16. (Reserved)
PART III
Item 17. Financial Statements
The Bank is providing the financial statements and related information specified in Item 18.
Item 18. Financial Statements
Item 19. Financial Statements and Exhibits
(a) List of Consolidated Financial Statements
74
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
75
BANCO LATINOAMERICANO DEEXPORTACIONES, S. A.AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2001 and 2000
(With Independent Auditors' Report Thereon)
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
To the Board of Directors and StockholdersBanco Latinoamericano de Exportaciones, S. A.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Banco Latinoamericano de Exportaciones, S. A. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in common stockholders equity and cash flows, and other comprehensive income for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Banks management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Banco Latinoamericano de Exportaciones, S. A. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.
As further disclosed in Note 6, the Bank has significant outstanding credit exposure with Argentine debtors totaling approximately US$1.1 billion at December 31, 2001. In addition, the Bank has Argentine exposure for US$292 million in securities purchased under agreements to resell, which are secured with U.S. Treasury securities. Considering the Argentine economic crisis and political situation, and the great uncertainty as to how or when these situations will be resolved, repayment problems with the Banks Argentine loans could have a material adverse effect on the Banks financial condition and results of operations. The Bank believes it has provided an appropriate level of allowance for credit losses given the information currently known regarding this matter, however, the situation of Argentina, over which the Bank has no control, is changing rapidly. The Bank will continue to monitor developments in Argentina closely and intends to take appropriate steps as more information and clarity on the Argentine governments actions, and their resultant impact on the Banks credit exposure, become available.
As further disclosed in Notes 2(j) and 19, the Bank changed its method of accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities effective January 1, 2001.
February 5, 2002Panama, Republic of Panama
F-1
BANCO LATINOAMERICANO DE EXPORTACIONES, S. A.AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
Consolidated Statements of Income
For Each of the Years in the Three-Year Period Ended December 31, 2001
F-3
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Stockholders Equity
For Each of the Years in the Three -Year Period Ended December 31, 2001
F-4
Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income
F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(1) Organization
F-7
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Principle of Consolidation
(b) Investment Securities
(c) Repurchase and Resale Agreements
F-8
(d) Loans
(e) Allowance for Credit Losses
(f) Premises and Equipment
(g) Capital Reserves
F-9
(h) Earnings Per Share
(i) Pre-operating Expenses
(j) Derivative Financial Instruments
F-10
(k) Commission Income
(l) Income Taxes
(m) Foreign Currency Translation
(n) Cash Equivalents
F-11
(o) Use of Estimates
(p) Cash and Stock Compensation
(q) Uniformity in the Presentation of the Financial Statements
F-12
(3) Balances and Transactions with Related Parties
F-13
(4) Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell
(5) Investment Securities
(a) Securities Available for Sale
F-14
(b) Securities Held to Maturity
F-15
F-16
(6) Loans
F-17
A summary of loans by country risk is as follows:
F-18
F-19
F-20
F-21
F-22
F-23
F-24
The Banks funding activities include a placement program of Euro Medium-Term Notes, which in June of 1999 was increased by US$750 million to a maximum of US$2,250 million. The program may be used to issue notes from 90 days up to a maximum of 30 years, at fixed, floating or discount interest and in various currencies. The sales of the issues are carried generally through one or more financial institutions authorized to that effect. The program has a global distribution through bearer or registered notes or a combination thereof, issued by the issuing and paying agent.
F-25
F-26
F-27
F-28
F-29
F-30
F-31
F-32
F-33
F-34
F-35
F-36
F-37
F-38
F-39
F-40
F-41
F-42
F-43
F-44
F-45