OR
Commission file number 1-9712
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨ Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION 2ND QUARTER REPORT ON FORM 10-QINDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Unaudited
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
-3-
UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Unaudited
-4-
UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ASSETS(Unaudited)
-5-
UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)
-6-
UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIESNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-7-
-8-
-9-
-10-
-11-
-12-
-13-
-14-
-15-
-16-
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTSOF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONUNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
United States Cellular Corporation (the “Company” or “U.S. Cellular” — AMEX symbol: USM) owns, operates and invests in wireless markets throughout the United States. The Company is an 82.2%-owned subsidiary of Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (“TDS”).
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s interim consolidated financial statements and footnotes included herein, and with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The Company owned, or had the right to acquire pursuant to certain agreements, either majority or minority interests in 165 cellular markets and 70 personal communications service (“PCS”) Basic Trading Area markets at June 30, 2003. The markets in which the Company has a controlling interest for financial reporting purposes (“consolidated markets”) include 10 markets that the Company transferred to AT&T Wireless (NYSE symbol: AWE) on August 1, 2003 pursuant to an agreement reached in March 2003. The Company expects to receive from AWE controlling interests in 36 PCS licenses and minority interests in six cellular markets in which the Company currently owns a controlling interest, 14 of which were transferred to the Company on August 1, 2003. A summary of the number of markets the Company owns or has acquirable as of June 30, 2003 follows.
-17-
Following is a table of summarized operating data for the Company’s consolidated operations.
The Company’s operations include 100% of the revenues and expenses of its consolidated markets plus its corporate office operations. Operating revenues, driven by a 22% increase in customers served, rose $232.9 million, or 23%, in 2003. Operating expenses, driven by growth in customers, fixed assets and minutes of use and the continued integration of the Chicago market into its operations, increased $365.6 million, or 44%, in 2003. Operating income decreased $132.7 million, or 73%, in 2003. The decline in operating income primarily reflects increases in all recurring operating expense captions that were larger than the growth in operating revenues. In addition, the Company recorded a loss, included in operating expenses, of $27.0 million in 2003 related to the assets transferred to AWE. The Company expects operating income for the full year of 2003 to be lower than in 2002.
Investment and other (expense) totaled $7.8 million in 2003 and $240.6 million in 2002. In 2003, interest expense increased related to the financing of the acquisition of the Chicago market during the second half of 2002. In 2002, the Company recorded a loss of $244.7 million on the other than temporary writedown of its marketable securities. Net income (loss) and diluted earnings per share totaled income of $14.5 million and $0.17, respectively, in 2003 and a loss of $39.9 million and ($0.46), respectively, in 2002. Excluding the after-tax effects of the cumulative effect of accounting change, net income (loss) and diluted earnings per share totaled income of $14.5 million and $0.17, respectively, in 2003 and a loss of $44.0 million and ($0.51), respectively, in 2002.
On August 7, 2002, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets and certain liabilities of Chicago 20MHz, LLC, now known as United States Cellular Operating Company of Chicago, LLC (“USCOC of Chicago” or the “Chicago market”) from PrimeCo Wireless Communications LLC (“PrimeCo”). USCOC of Chicago operates a wireless system in the Chicago Major Trading Area (“MTA”). USCOC of Chicago is the holder of certain FCC licenses, including a 20 megahertz (“MHz”) PCS license in the Chicago MTA (excluding Kenosha County, Wisconsin) covering a total population of 13.2 million. The Chicago market’s operations are included in consolidated operations for the first half of 2003 but not for the comparable period of 2002. The Chicago market’s operations contributed to the increases in the Company’s operating revenues and expenses during 2003 compared to 2002.
-18-
Operating revenues increased $232.9 million, or 23%, in 2003.
Service revenues primarily consist of: (i) charges for access, airtime and value-added services provided to the Company’s retail customers (“retail service”); (ii) charges to other wireless carriers whose customers use the Company’s wireless systems when roaming (“inbound roaming”); and (iii) charges for long-distance calls made on the Company’s systems. Service revenues increased $212.4 million, or 22%, in 2003. The increase was primarily due to the growing number of retail customers. Monthly service revenue per customer averaged $46.24 in 2003, a 1% increase from an average of $45.82 in 2002.
Retail service revenueincreased $188.4 million, or 24%, in 2003. Growth in the Company’s customer base and an increase in average monthly retail service revenue per customer were the primary reasons for the increase in retail service revenue. The number of customers increased 22% to 4,343,000 at June 30, 2003, due to customer additions from its marketing channels as well as the addition of customers from the Chicago market acquisition over the past 12 months, and average monthly retail service revenue per customer increased 3% to $37.89 in 2003.
Management anticipates that overall growth in the Company’s customer base will continue at a slower pace in the future, primarily as a result of an increase in the number of competitors in its markets and continued penetration of the consumer market. As the Company expands its operations in the Chicago market and into other PCS markets in the remainder of 2003 and in 2004, it anticipates adding customers and revenues in those markets.
Monthly local retail minutes of use per customer averaged 401 in 2003 and 259 in 2002. The increase in monthly local retail minutes of use was driven by the Company’s focus on designing incentive programs and rate plans to stimulate overall usage, as well as the acquisition of the Chicago market, whose customers used more minutes per month than the Company average. The impact on retail service revenue of the increase in minutes of use in 2003 was partially offset by a decrease in average revenue per minute of use. Management anticipates that the Company’s average revenue per minute of use will continue to decline in the future, reflecting increased competition and penetration of the consumer market.
Inbound roaming revenuedecreased $5.3 million, or 4%, in 2003. The decrease in revenue related to inbound roaming on the Company’s systems primarily resulted from a decrease in revenue per roaming minute of use, partially offset by the increase in roaming minutes used. The increase in inbound roaming minutes of use was primarily driven by the overall growth in the number of customers throughout the wireless industry. The decline in revenue per minute of use is primarily due to the general downward trend in negotiated rates.
Management anticipates that the rate of growth in inbound roaming minutes of use will continue to slow down due to two factors:
Management also anticipates that average inbound roaming revenue per minute of use will continue to decline, reflecting the continued general downward trend in negotiated rates.
-19-
Long-distance and other revenue increased $29.3 million, or 41%, in 2003, primarily related to a $19.2 million increase in amounts billed to the Company’s customers to offset costs related to certain regulatory mandates, such as universal service funding, wireless number portability and E-911 infrastructure, which are being passed through to customers. Additionally, the amounts the Company charges to its customers to offset universal service funding costs increased significantly due to changes in FCC regulations beginning April 1, 2003, contributing to the $19.2 million increase.
The increase in long-distance and other revenue was also driven by an increase in the volume of long-distance calls billed by the Company from inbound roamers using the Company’s systems to make long-distance calls. This effect was partially offset by price reductions primarily related to long-distance charges on roaming minutes of use as well as the Company’s increasing use of pricing plans for its customers which include long-distance calling at no additional charge.
Equipment sales revenuesincreased $20.5 million, or 51%, in 2003. The increase in equipment sales revenues reflects a change in the Company’s method of distributing handsets to its agent channel. Beginning in the second quarter of 2002, the Company began selling handsets to its agents at a price approximately equal to the Company’s cost before applying any rebates. Previously, the Company’s agents purchased handsets from third parties. Selling handsets to agents enables the Company to provide better control over handset quality, set roaming preferences and pass along quantity discounts. Management anticipates that the Company will continue to sell handsets to agents in the future, and that it will continue to provide rebates to agents who provide handsets to new and current customers.
In these transactions, equipment sales revenue is recognized upon delivery of the related products to the agents, net of any anticipated agent rebates. In most cases, the agents receive a rebate from the Company at the time these agents provide handsets to sign up a new customer or retain a current customer.
Handset sales to agents, net of all rebates, increased equipment sales revenues by approximately $27.5 million during 2003. Equipment sales to customers through the Company’s non-agent channels decreased $7.0 million, or 20%, from 2002. Gross customer activations, the primary driver of equipment sales revenues, increased 41% in 2003. The increase in gross customer activations in 2003 was driven by an increase in store traffic in the Company’s markets and the acquisition of the Chicago market, which added to the Company’s distribution network. The decrease in equipment sales revenues from the Company’s non-agent channels is primarily attributable to lower revenue per handset in 2003, reflecting declining handset prices on most models and the reduction in sales prices to end users as a result of increased competition.
Operating expenses increased $365.7 million, or 44%, in 2003.
System operations expensesincreased $58.9 million, or 26%, in 2003. System operations expenses include charges from other telecommunications service providers for the Company’s customers’ use of their facilities, costs related to local interconnection to the landline network, charges for maintenance of the Company’s network, long-distance charges and outbound roaming expenses. The increase in system operations expenses in 2003 was due to the following factors:
-20-
The ongoing reduction both in the per-minute cost of usage on the Company’s systems and in negotiated roaming rates partially offset the above factors.
As a result of the above factors, the components of system operations expenses were affected as follows:
In 2003, system operations expenses increased due to the acquisition of the Chicago market, whose expenses are included in the increases noted above. The increase in expenses in the Chicago market was partially offset by a reduction in expenses in other markets, primarily in the Midwest, when customers in those markets used the Chicago system. In 2002, the Company paid roaming charges to third parties when its customers roamed in the Chicago market.
In total, management expects system operations expenses to increase over the next few years, driven by the following factors:
These factors are expected to be partially offset by anticipated decreases in the per-minute cost of usage both on the Company’s systems and on other carriers’ networks. As the Chicago area has historically been the Company’s customers’ most popular roaming destination, management anticipates that the continued integration of the Chicago market into its operations will result in a further increase in minutes of use by the Company’s customers on its systems and a corresponding decrease in minutes of use by its customers on other systems, resulting in a lower overall increase in minutes of use by the Company’s customers on other systems. Such a shift in minutes of use should reduce the Company’s per-minute cost of usage in the future, to the extent that the Company’s customers use the Company’s systems rather than other carriers’ networks. Additionally, the Company’s acquisition and subsequent buildout of licensed areas received in the AWE transaction may shift more minutes of use to the Company’s systems, as many of these licensed areas are major roaming destinations for the Company’s current customers.
Marketing and selling expensesincreased $49.4 million, or 31%, in 2003. Marketing and selling expenses primarily consist of salaries, commissions and expenses of field sales and retail personnel and offices; agent commissions and related expenses; corporate marketing, merchandise management and telesales department salaries and expenses; advertising; and public relations expenses. The increase in 2003 was primarily due to the following factors:
Cost of equipment soldincreased $55.1 million, or 82%, in 2003. The increase in 2003 is primarily due to the $52.9 million increase in handset costs related to the sale of handsets to agents beginning in the second quarter of 2002. Cost of equipment sold from non-agent channels increased by $2.2 million, or 4%, in 2003. The increase in cost of equipment sold from non-agent channels primarily reflects a 41% increase in gross customer activations, almost fully offset by the effects of economies realized from the Company’s merchandise management system.
Marketing cost per gross customer activation (“CPGA”), which includes marketing and selling expenses and cost of equipment sold, less equipment sales revenues (excluding agent rebates related to customer retention), decreased 2% to $367 in 2003 from $374 in 2002. Agent rebates related to the retention of
-21-
current customers increased $13.2 million in 2003. Due to the impact of such agent rebates, CPGA is not calculable using financial information derived directly from the statement of operations. Future CPGA calculations will also be impacted by the effects of agent rebates related to customer retention.
General and administrative expenses increased $111.6 million, or 50%, in 2003. These expenses include the costs of operating the Company’s customer care centers, the costs of serving and retaining customers and the majority of the Company’s corporate expenses. Monthly general and administrative expenses per customer increased 29% to $13.65 in 2003 from $10.57 in 2002. General and administrative expenses represented 28% of service revenues in 2003 and 23% in 2002. The increase in general and administrative expenses in 2003 is primarily due to the following factors:
The above factors were all impacted by the acquisition of the Chicago market.
The Company anticipates that customer retention expenses will increase in the future as it changes to a single digital technology platform and certain customers will require new handsets. A substantial portion of these customer retention expenses are anticipated to be agent rebates, which are recorded as a reduction of equipment sales revenues.
Depreciation expense increased $48.1 million, or 36%, in 2003. The increases reflect rising average fixed asset balances, which increased 33% in 2003. Increased fixed asset balances in 2003 resulted from the following factors:
See “Financial Resources and Liquidity – Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further discussion of the Company’s capital expenditures.
Amortization of deferred charges and customer lists increased $15.6 million, or 109%, in 2003, primarily driven by the $11.1 million of amortization related to the customer list intangible assets and other deferred charges acquired in the USCOC of Chicago transaction during 2002. These customer list assets are amortized based on the average customer retention periods of each customer list.
Loss on assets held for saletotaled $27.0 million in 2003. This loss represents the difference between the fair value of the assets the Company expects to receive in the AWE transaction, as determined by an independent valuation, and the recorded value of the assets it expects to transfer to AWE. Subsequent to recording the loss, the recorded value of the assets the Company expects to transfer to AWE is equal to the fair value of the assets the Company expects to receive from AWE. This loss may require an adjustment during the third quarter of 2003 to reflect the final amounts of the fair value of assets received and the recorded value of the assets transferred.
-22-
Operating income totaled $48.2 million in 2003 compared to $181.0 million in 2002, a 73% decrease. The operating income margins (as a percent of service revenues) were 4.1% in 2003 and 18.8% in 2002. The decline in operating income and operating income margin in 2003 reflects the following:
These were partially offset by increased service revenues, driven by growth in the number of customers served by the Company’s systems and an increase in average monthly revenue per customer.
The Company expects most of the above factors, except for those related to the launch and transition of the Chicago market, to continue to have an effect on operating income and operating margins for the next several quarters. Any changes in the above factors, as well as the effects of other drivers of the Company’s operating results, may cause operating income and operating margins to fluctuate over the next several quarters.
Related to the Company’s acquisition and subsequent transition of the Chicago market’s operations, the Company plans to incur additional expenses during the remainder of 2003 as it competes in the Chicago market. Additionally, the Company plans to build out its network into other as yet unserved portions of its PCS licensed areas, and will begin marketing operations in those areas during 2003 and 2004. As a result, the Company’s operating income and operating margin may be below historical levels for the full year of 2003 compared to the full year of 2002.
The Company expects service revenues to continue to grow during the remainder of 2003; however, management anticipates that average monthly service revenue per customer may decrease, as retail service revenue per minute of use and inbound roaming revenue per minute of use decline. Additionally, the Company expects expenses to remain higher than normal during the remainder of 2003 as it incurs costs associated with customer growth, service and retention, initiation of service in new markets and fixed asset additions.
Management continues to believe there exists a seasonality in both service revenues, which tend to increase more slowly in the first and fourth quarters, and operating expenses, which tend to be higher in the fourth quarter due to increased marketing activities and customer growth, which may cause operating income to vary from quarter to quarter. Management anticipates that the impact of such seasonality will decrease in the future, particularly as it relates to operating expenses, as the proportion of full year customer activations derived from fourth quarter holiday sales is expected to decline.
Additionally, competitors licensed to provide wireless services have initiated service in substantially all of the Company’s markets over the past several years. The Company expects other wireless operators to continue deployment of their networks throughout all of the Company’s service areas during the remainder of 2003 and in 2004. Management continues to monitor other wireless communications providers’ strategies to determine how additional competition is affecting the Company’s results.
The effects of additional wireless competition and the downturn in the nation’s economy have significantly slowed customer growth in certain of the Company’s markets. Management anticipates that overall customer growth may be slower in the future, primarily as a result of the increase in competition in its markets and due to the maturation of the wireless industry.
The FCC has mandated that all wireless carriers must be capable of facilitating wireless number portability beginning in November 2003. At that time, any wireless customer in the largest 100 Metropolitan
-23-
Statistical Areas in the United States may switch carriers and keep their current wireless telephone number. The Company believes it will have the infrastructure in place to accommodate wireless number portability as of the November 2003 deadline. The implementation of wireless number portability may impact the Company’s churn rate in the future; however, the Company is unable to predict the impact that the implementation of wireless number portability will have on its overall business.
Investment and other (expense)totaled $7.8 million in 2003 and $240.6 million in 2002.
Investment income was $25.9 million in 2003 and $17.7 million in 2002. Investment income primarily represents the Company’s share of net income from the markets managed by others that are accounted for by the equity method.
Interest expense totaled $31.9 million in 2003 and $17.7 million in 2002. Interest expense in 2003 is primarily related to Liquid Yield Option Notes (“LYONs”) ($4.6 million); the Company’s 7.25% Notes ($9.3 million); the Company’s 8.75% Notes ($5.7 million); the Company’s revolving credit facilities with a series of banks ($4.1 million); the Company’s contracts with a series of banks related to its investment in Vodafone AirTouch plc (ticker symbol “VOD”) (“forward contracts”) ($1.5 million); and the Company’s intercompany note with TDS (the “Intercompany Note”) ($4.3 million). Interest expense in 2002 was primarily related to LYONs ($4.4 million), the 7.25% Notes ($9.2 million) and the Company’s revolving credit facility entered into in 1997 with a series of banks (the “1997 Revolving Credit Facility”) ($2.6 million).
The LYONs are zero coupon convertible debentures which accrete interest at 6% annually, but do not require current cash payments of interest. All accreted interest is added to the outstanding principal balance on June 15 and December 15 of each year.
The Company’s $250 million principal amount of 7.25% Notes are unsecured and become due in August 2007. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year.
In November 2002, the Company sold $130 million of 8.75% Senior Notes. Interest is payable quarterly. The notes are callable by the Company, at the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, at any time on and after November 7, 2007. The Company issued the 8.75% Senior Notes under the $500 million shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed in May 2002.
For information regarding the Company’s 1997 and 2002 Revolving Credit Facilities, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Revolving Credit Facilities.” For information regarding the forward contracts, see “Market Risk.” For information regarding the Intercompany Note from TDS, see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”
Loss on investments totaled $3.5 million in 2003 and $244.7 million in 2002. In 2003, a license impairment loss was recorded related to the Company’s investment in a non-operational market in Florida that remains with the Company after the exchange with AWE was completed. In June 2002, the Company recognized other than temporary losses on its investments in VOD and Rural Cellular Corporation (“RCCC”).
Income tax expense (benefit)totaled expense of $21.1 million in 2003 and a benefit of $19.3 million in 2002. The overall effective tax rates were 52% in 2003 and 32% in 2002. The effective tax rates in 2003 and 2002 were impacted by the loss on assets held for sale and the losses on investments, which have different tax rates than the Company’s overall operations. For an analysis of the Company’s effective tax rates in 2003 and 2002, see Note 3 – Income Taxes.
TDS and the Company are parties to a Tax Allocation Agreement, pursuant to which the Company is included in a consolidated federal income tax return with other members of the TDS consolidated group.
For financial reporting purposes, the Company computes federal income taxes as if it was filing a separate return as its own affiliated group and was not included in the TDS group.
-24-
As a result of the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, enacted in May of 2003, the Company anticipates that it will claim additional federal tax depreciation deductions in 2003. Such additional depreciation deductions may result in a federal net operating loss for the Company for the full year of 2003.
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax added $4.1 million, or $.05 per diluted share, to income in 2002. The amount reflects the Company’s change in its application of SAB No. 101. Effective January 1, 2002, the Company began deferring expense recognition of a portion of its commissions expenses, in the amount of activation fees revenue deferred. The cumulative effect in 2002 represents the aggregate impact of this accounting change for periods prior to 2002.
Net income (loss) totaled income of $14.5 million in 2003 and a loss of $39.9 million in 2002. Diluted earnings (loss) per share was $0.17 in 2003 and ($0.46) in 2002.
Operating revenues totaled $639.8 million in the second quarter of 2003, an increase of $115.5 million, or 22%, from 2002.
Retail service revenues increased $97.9 million, or 24%, in 2003 primarily due to 22% growth in the Company’s customer base and a 2% increase in average monthly retail service revenue per customer.
Inbound roaming revenue decreased $5.5 million, or 9%, in 2003 for reasons generally the same as for the first six months of 2003.
Long-distance and other revenues increased $16.6 million, or 43%, in 2003 for reasons generally the same as for the first six months of 2003.
Equipment sales revenue increased $6.5 million, or 28%, in 2003. The increase in equipment sales revenues primarily reflects an increase in handset sales to agents, which began in the second quarter of 2002. Such handset sales to agents, net of all rebates, increased equipment sales revenues by approximately $9.8 million during 2003. Equipment sales to customers through the Company’s non-agent channels decreased $3.3 million, or 18%, from 2002. Gross customer activations increased 34% in 2003. The decrease in equipment sales revenues from the Company’s non-agent channels is primarily attributable to lower revenue per handset in the second quarter of 2003, reflecting declining handset prices on most models and the reduction in sales prices to end users as a result of increased competition.
Operating expenses totaled $585.4 million in the second quarter of 2003, an increase of $162.3 million, or 38%, from 2002.
System operations expenses increased $28.9 million, or 24%, in 2003 for reasons generally the same as for the first six months of 2003.
Marketing and selling expenses increased $19.6 million, or 25%, in 2003 for reasons generally the same as for the first six months of 2003. Gross customer activations increased 34% in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002.
Cost of equipment sold increased $20.8 million, or 57%, in 2003 for reasons generally the same as for the first six months of 2003.
CPGA decreased 2% to $378 in 2003 from $386 in 2002.
General and administrative expenses increased $62.6 million, or 55%, in 2003 for reasons generally the same as for the first six months of 2003. Monthly general and administrative expenses per customer increased 31% to $14.09 in 2003 from $10.75 in 2002. General and administrative expenses as a percent
-25-
of service revenues were 29% in 2003 and 23% in 2002.
Depreciation expense increased $18.1 million, or 26%, in 2003 for reasons generally the same as for the first six months of 2003. Average fixed asset balances increased 30% in 2003.
Amortization of deferred charges and customer lists increased $8.7 million, or 117%, in 2003 for reasons generally the same as for the first six months of 2003.
Operating income decreased $46.8 million, or 46%, to $54.5 million in 2003; operating income margins (as a percent of service revenues) totaled 8.9% in 2003 and 20.2% in 2002.
Investment and other (expense) totaled $1.4 million in 2003 and $243.4 million in 2002. Investment income increased $6.2 million, or 85%, in 2003 as the Company’s share of net income from the markets managed by others that are accounted for by the equity method increased. Loss on investments totaled $244.7 million in 2002, as the Company recognized an other than temporary loss on its investments in VOD and RCCC.
Interest expense increased $7.8 million, or 90%, in 2003, as the Company’s average debt balances increased since June 2002, primarily to finance the USCOC of Chicago acquisition and subsequent operations and to fund capital expenditures.
Income tax expense (benefit) totaled expense of $22.2 million in 2003 and a benefit of $55.0 million in 2002. For an analysis of the Company’s effective tax rates in 2003 and 2002, see Note 3 – Income Taxes.
Net income (loss) totaled income of $29.1 million in 2003 compared to a net loss of $88.4 million in 2002. Diluted earnings (loss) per share totaled $0.34 in 2003 and ($1.03) in 2002.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 149 “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” was issued in April 2003, and is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” The Company will adopt the provisions of this Standard to contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and to hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. Since the provisions of this Statement will be applied prospectively, there will be no impact to the Company’s June 30, 2003 financial position or results of operations.
SFAS No. 150 “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” was issued in May 2003, and is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise beginning July 1, 2003. SFAS No. 150 requires freestanding financial instruments within its scope to be recorded as a liability in the financial statements. Freestanding financial instruments include mandatorily redeemable financial instruments, obligations to repurchase issuer’s equity shares and certain obligations to issue a variable number of issuer’s shares. As of June 30, 2003, the Company has no freestanding financial instruments within the scope of SFAS No. 150. Upon adoption, this Statement is not expected to have any effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.
FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” was issued in January 2003, and is effective for all variable interests in variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and is effective July 1, 2003 for variable interests in variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003. This Interpretation clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 “Consolidated Financial Statements” to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The Company has reviewed the provisions of FIN 46 and has determined that it does not have an impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
-26-
The Company operates a capital- and marketing-intensive business. In recent years, the Company has generated cash from its operations, received cash proceeds from divestitures and used its short-term credit facilities to fund its network construction costs and operating expenses. The Company anticipates further increases in wireless customers, revenues, operating expenses, cash flows from operating activities and fixed asset additions in the future. Cash flows may fluctuate from quarter to quarter depending on the seasonality of each of these growth factors.
Cash flows from operating activities provided $195.0 million in 2003 and $306.8 million in 2002. Income excluding adjustments to reconcile income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities, excluding noncash items and changes in assets and liabilities from operations, totaled $262.4 million in 2003 and $284.8 million in 2002. Changes in assets and liabilities from operations required $67.4 million in 2003 and provided $22.0 million in 2002, reflecting timing differences in the payment of accounts payable and accrued taxes and the receipt of accounts receivable. Income taxes and interest paid totaled $16.9 million in 2003 and $22.7 million in 2002.
The following table is a summary of the components of cash flows from operating activities.
Cash flows from investing activities required $289.2 million in 2003 and $223.5 million in 2002. Cash required for property, plant and equipment and system development expenditures totaled $304.0 million in 2003 and $256.8 million in 2002. In 2003, these expenditures were financed primarily with internally generated cash and borrowings from the Company’s revolving credit facilities. In 2002, these expenditures were financed primarily with internally generated cash. These expenditures primarily represent the construction of 192 and 170 cell sites in 2003 and 2002, respectively, as well as other plant additions and costs related to the development of the Company’s office systems. In 2003, these plant additions included approximately $43 million for the migration to a single digital equipment platform. In both periods, other plant additions included significant amounts related to the replacement of retired assets and the changeout of analog equipment for digital equipment. Acquisitions required $1.2 million in 2003 and $18.0 million in 2002. Cash distributions from wireless entities in which the Company has an interest provided $17.6 million in 2003 and $5.8 million in 2002. In 2002, the Company was refunded $47.6 million of its deposit with the FCC related to the January 2001 FCC spectrum auction.
Cash flows from financing activities provided $105.0 million in 2003 and required $93.9 million in 2002. In 2003, the Company repaid the remaining principal amount outstanding on its 9% Series A Notes due 2032 (the “9% Series A Notes”) with $40.7 million in cash, which was financed using the Company’s revolving credit facilities. The 9% Series A Notes were issued to PrimeCo in a private placement on August 2002 and are now retired. In 2002, the Company received $160.0 million from the monetization of its VOD investment through the forward contracts. In 2002, the Company repaid $306.4 million under the 1997 Revolving Credit Facility. In 2003 and 2002, the Company borrowed $145.0 million and $57.4 million, respectively, under its revolving credit facilities.
The Company assesses its wireless holdings on an ongoing basis in order to maximize the benefits derived from its operating markets. The Company also reviews attractive opportunities for the acquisition
-27-
of additional wireless spectrum.
In the first six months of 2003, the Company did not complete any material acquisitions of wireless interests.
In the first six months of 2002, the Company, through joint ventures, acquired majority interests in licenses in two PCS markets, representing a total population of 911,000, for $18.0 million in cash.
In the first six months of 2003 and 2002, the Company did not complete any material divestitures of wireless interests.
On March 10, 2003, the Company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement with AWE to exchange wireless properties. The closing of the transfer of Company properties to AWE and the assignments to the Company by AWE of a portion of the PCS licenses covered by the agreement with AWE occurred on August 1, 2003. When this transaction is fully consummated, the Company will receive 10 and 20 MHz PCS licenses in 13 states, representing 12.2 million incremental population equivalents contiguous to existing properties and 4.4 million population equivalents that overlap existing properties in the Midwest and Northeast. On the initial closing date, the Company also received approximately $31 million in cash (excluding a working capital adjustment) and minority interests in six cellular markets it currently controls. Also on the initial closing date, the Company transferred wireless assets and customers in 10 markets, representing 1.5 million population equivalents, in Florida and Georgia to AWE. The assignment and development of certain licenses has been deferred by the Company until later periods. The acquisition of licenses in the exchange will be accounted for as a purchase by the Company and the transfer of the properties by the Company to AWE will be accounted for as a sale.
As a result of the agreement, the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2003 reflects the wireless assets and liabilities to be transferred as assets and liabilities of operations held for sale, in accordance with SFAS No. 144. The results of operations of the markets transferred continue to be included in results from operations. Service revenues from the Florida and Georgia markets transferred totaled $29 million and $58 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, while operating income totaled $12.6 million and $22.4 million, respectively. Operating income does not include shared services costs that have been allocated to the markets from the Company's corporate office.
Anticipated capital expenditures requirements for 2003 primarily reflect the Company’s plans for construction, system expansion, the execution of its plans to migrate to a single digital equipment platform and the buildout of certain of its PCS licensed areas. The Company’s estimated capital spending for 2003 is $650 million to $670 million, of which $304 million of expenditures have been incurred as of June 30, 2003. These expenditures will primarily address the following needs:
The Company expects its conversion to CDMA to be completed during 2004, at a revised approximate cost of $385 million to $410 million spread over 2002 to 2004. The estimates have been revised from the original estimate of $400 million to $450 million to reflect more favorable pricing than expected as well as additional efficiencies in the conversion process. Capital expenditures related to this conversion totaled $215 million in 2002, and are estimated to be $50 million in 2003 and $120 million to $145 million is
-28-
planned for 2004. The Company has contracted with multiple infrastructure vendors to provide a substantial portion of the equipment related to the conversion.
The Company expects capital expenditures related to the buildout of the PCS licensed areas it acquired in 2001-2003, including those included in the AWE transaction, to be substantial. The Company plans to build networks to serve these licensed areas and launch commercial service in these areas over the next several years. Approximately $80 million of the estimated capital spending for the remainder of 2003 is allocated to the buildout of certain of these licenses, and the Company expects a significant portion of its capital spending over the next few years to be related to the buildout of PCS licensed areas.
The Company, as market conditions warrant, may continue the repurchase of its common shares, on the open market or at negotiated prices in private transactions. There are 859,000 shares available to be repurchased under the most recent 1.4 million share authorization, which expires in December 2003. The repurchases of common shares will be funded by internal cash flow, supplemented by short-term borrowings and other sources.
The Company’s board of directors has authorized management to opportunistically repurchase LYONs in private transactions. The Company may also purchase a limited amount of LYONs in open-market transactions from time to time. The Company’s LYONs are convertible, at the option of their holders, at any time prior to maturity, redemption or purchase, into USM Common Shares at a conversion rate of 9.475 USM Common Shares per LYON. Upon conversion, the Company has the option to deliver to holders either USM Common Shares or cash equal to the market value of the USM Common Shares into which the LYONs are convertible. The Company may redeem the LYONs for cash at the issue price plus accrued original issue discount through the date of redemption.
The Company is generating substantial cash from its operations and anticipates financing all of the 2003 obligations listed above with internally generated cash and with borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facilities as the timing of such expenditures warrants. The Company had $25.7 million of cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2003.
At June 30, 2003, $20 million of the 1997 Revolving Credit Facility and $200 million of the 2002 Revolving Credit Facility, respectively, were unused and remained available to meet any short-term borrowing requirements.
The 1997 Revolving Credit Facility expires in August 2004 and provides for borrowings with interest at LIBOR plus a margin percentage based on the Company’s credit rating, which was 19.5 basis points as of June 30, 2003 (for a rate of 1.32% as of June 30, 2003).
The 2002 Revolving Credit Facility expires in June 2007 and permits revolving loans on terms and conditions substantially similar to the Company’s 1997 Revolving Credit Facility. The terms of the 2002 Revolving Credit Facility provide for borrowings with interest at LIBOR plus a margin percentage based on the Company’s credit rating, which was 55 basis points as of June 30, 2003 (for a rate of 1.67% as of June 30, 2003).
The continued availability of these revolving lines of credit requires the Company to comply with certain negative and affirmative covenants, maintain certain financial ratios and to represent certain matters at the time of each borrowing. At June 30, 2003, the Company was in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in the revolving credit facilities. The Company’s interest cost related to both lines of credit would increase if its credit rating goes down, which would increase its cost of financing, but such lines of credit would not cease to be available solely as a result of a decline in its credit rating.
Management believes that the Company’s cash flows from operations and sources of external financing, including the above-referenced 1997 and 2002 Revolving Credit Facilities, provide sufficient financial flexibility for the Company to meet both its short- and long-term needs. The Company also may have access to public and private capital markets to help meet its long-term financing needs. The Company
-29-
anticipates issuing debt and equity securities when capital requirements (including acquisitions), financial market conditions and other factors warrant.
However, the availability of financial resources is dependent on economic events, business developments, technological changes, financial conditions or other factors, some of which may not be in the Company’s control. If at any time financing is not available on terms acceptable to the Company, it might be required to reduce its business development and capital expenditure plans, which could have a materially adverse effect on its business and financial condition. The Company does not believe that any circumstances that could materially adversely affect its liquidity or capital resources are currently reasonably likely to occur, but it cannot provide assurances that such circumstances will not occur or that they will not occur rapidly. Economic downturns, changes in financial markets or other factors could rapidly change the availability of the Company’s liquidity and capital resources. Uncertainty of access to capital for telecommunications companies, further deterioration in the capital markets, other changes in market conditions or other factors could limit or restrict the availability of financing on terms and prices acceptable to the Company, which could require the Company to reduce its construction, development and acquisition programs.
At June 30, 2003, the Company is in compliance with all covenants and other requirements set forth in long-term debt indentures. The Company does not have any rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of its debt. However, a downgrade in the Company’s credit rating could adversely affect its ability to renew existing, or obtain access to new, credit facilities in the future.
In June 2003, Moody’s Investors Service placed the debt ratings of U.S. Cellular and TDS, its parent company, under review for possible downgrade. Moody’s has stated that the review will focus on “1) U.S. Cellular’s ability to improve its earnings and generate meaningful free cash flow given its substantial capital expenditure requirements, slowing industry subscriber growth rates, declining roaming revenues, intensifying competition and higher operating expenses associated with competition, increasing network usage and expansion of distribution channels and 2) the extent and timing of the de-leveraging of the balance sheet of TDS.”
The Company has no material transactions, arrangements, obligations (including contingent obligations), or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons (“off-balance sheet arrangements”), that may have or are reasonably likely to have a material current of future effect on financial condition, changes in financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, capital resources, or significant components of revenues or expenses.
The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Company’s significant accounting policies are discussed in detail in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions and information that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Management believes the following critical accounting estimates reflect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. The Company’s senior management has discussed the development and selection of each of the following accounting estimates and the following disclosures with the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors.
-30-
The Company reported $979.8 million of investment in licenses and $547.7 million of goodwill at June 30, 2003 as a result of the acquisition of wireless licenses and markets. Included in Assets of Operations Held for Sale as of June 30, 2003 was $55.1 million of investment in licenses and $93.7 million of goodwill.
Investments in licenses and goodwill must be reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The Company performs the annual impairment review on investments in licenses and goodwill during the second quarter. There can be no assurance that, upon review at a later date, material impairment charges will not be required.
The intangible asset impairment test consists of comparing the fair value of the intangible asset to the carrying amount of the intangible asset. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, the second step of the test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. To calculate the implied fair value of goodwill, an enterprise allocates the fair value of the reporting unit to all of the assets and liabilities of that reporting unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of goodwill. If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for that difference.
The fair value of an intangible asset and reporting unit goodwill is the amount at which that asset or reporting unit could be bought or sold in a current transaction between willing parties. Therefore, quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value and should be used when available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value shall be based on the best information available, including prices for similar assets and the use of other valuation techniques. Other valuation techniques include present value analysis, multiples of earnings or revenue or a similar performance measure. The use of these techniques involve assumptions by management about the following factors that are highly uncertain and can result in a range of values: future cash flows, the appropriate discount rate and other factors and inputs.
In the first quarter of 2003, a license impairment loss of $3.5 million was recorded related to the Company’s investment in a non-operational market in Florida that will remain after the exchange with AWE is completed. The annual impairment review of goodwill and license costs for 2003, completed in the second quarter, did not result in any impairment losses.
The accounting for income taxes, the amounts of income tax assets and liabilities and the related income tax provision are critical accounting estimates because such amounts are significant to the company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires the Company to calculate its provision for income taxes. This process involves estimating the actual current income tax liability together with assessing temporary differences resulting from the different treatment of items, such as depreciation expense, for tax and accounting purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company must then assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and, to the extent management believes that recovery is not likely, establish a valuation allowance. Management’s judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets. The Company’s current net deferred tax asset, included in Other current assets on its consolidated balance sheet, was $10.4 million as of June 30, 2003, representing primarily the deferred tax effects of the allowance for doubtful accounts on accounts receivable.
-31-
The temporary differences that gave rise to the noncurrent deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2003 are as follows:
The valuation allowance relates to state net operating loss carryforwards and the federal operating loss carryforwards for those subsidiaries not included in the federal income tax return since it is more than likely that a portion will expire before such carryforwards can be utilized.
The deferred income tax liability relating to marketable equity securities of $63.6 million at June 30, 2003 represents deferred income taxes calculated on the difference between the book basis and the tax basis of the marketable securities. Income taxes will be payable when the Company sells the marketable equity securities.
The Company is routinely subject to examination of its income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other tax authorities. The Company periodically assesses the likelihood of adjustments to its tax liabilities resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of its provision for income taxes, including related interest. Management’s judgment is required in assessing the eventual outcome of these examinations. Changes to such assessments affect the calculation of the Company’s income tax expense. The IRS has completed audits of the Company’s federal income tax returns (through its parent company – TDS) for tax years through 1996.
In the event of an increase in the value of tax assets or a decrease in the value of tax liabilities, the Company would decrease the income tax expense or increase the income tax benefit by an equivalent amount. In the event of a decrease in the value of tax assets or an increase in the value of tax liabilities, the Company would increase the income tax expense or decrease the income tax benefit by an equivalent amount.
The Jobs & Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, enacted in May 2003, provides for increases in bonus depreciation from 30% to 50% and extends the bonus depreciation provisions until December 31, 2004. The Company expects to take advantage of the new rules. Such additional depreciation deductions are expected to result in a federal net operating loss for the Company in 2003.
In connection with the exchange of properties with AWE , the Company’s consolidated balance sheets reflect the assets and liabilities to be transferred as of June 30, 2003 as assets and liabilities of operations held for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” The results of operations of the markets to be transferred continue to be included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations through the closing date of August 1, 2003.
An independent appraisal was performed to determine the fair value of the assets to be received from AWE as well as the allocation of goodwill associated with the markets sold. The value of goodwill and licenses allocated to the transferred markets is a critical accounting estimate because it is significant to the recorded value of the assets being transferred. The values of such allocations include underlying
-32-
assumptions about uncertain matters that are material to the determination of the values, and different estimates could have had a material impact on the Company’s financial presentation that would have been used in the current period.
Assets and liabilities relating to operations held for sale are summarized as follows.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the Company recorded an estimated pre-tax loss of $27.0 million related to the sale of assets to AWE. This loss represents the difference between the fair value of the assets the Company expects to receive in the AWE transaction, as determined by an independent valuation, and the recorded value of the assets it transferred to AWE. Subsequent to recording the loss, the recorded value of the assets the Company expects to transfer to AWE is equal to the fair value of the assets the Company expects to receive from AWE. This loss may require an adjustment during the third quarter of 2003 to reflect the final amounts of the fair value of assets received and the recorded value of the assets transferred.
The Company anticipates that it will record an additional charge to the Statement of Operations of approximately $12 million for income taxes and will have a current liability of approximately $4 million related to state income taxes on the completion of the transaction. As a result of the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, enacted in May of 2003, the Company anticipates that it will claim additional federal tax depreciation deductions in 2003. Such additional depreciation deductions are expected to result in a federal net operating loss for the Company for 2003; accordingly, the Company anticipates that there will be no current federal tax liability in 2003 attributable to the planned exchange of assets with AWE.
-33-
This outlook section summarizes the Company’s expectations for 2003. Notwithstanding the Company’s expectations regarding its ability to deliver these results, the Company can never be certain that future revenues or earnings will be achieved at any particular level. Estimates of future financial performance are forward-looking statements and are subject to uncertainty created by the risk factors otherwise identified under “Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement.”
Based on the completion of the Company’s transaction with AWE, the Company has reviewed its forward-looking statements. The revised statements for the year 2003, inclusive of costs for buildout of some markets acquired in the AWE transaction, are as follows:
2003 Outlook
* Includes $27 million in operating expenses related to loss on assets held for sale related to the AWE exchange.
In August 2002, the Company entered into a loan agreement with TDS under which it borrowed $105 million, which was used for the USCOC of Chicago purchase. The loan bears interest at an annual rate of 8.1%, payable quarterly, and becomes due in August 2008, with prepayments optional. The terms of the loan do not contain covenants that are more restrictive than those included in the Company’s senior debt, except that the loan agreement provides that the Company may not incur senior debt in an aggregate principal amount in excess of $325 million unless it obtains the consent of TDS as lender. The loan is subordinated to the 2002 Revolving Credit Facility. The Company’s Board of Directors, including independent directors, approved the terms of this loan and determined that such terms were fair to the Company and all of its shareholders.
The Company is billed for all services it receives from TDS, pursuant to the terms of various agreements between the Company and TDS. The majority of these billings are included in the Company’s general and administrative expenses. Some of these agreements were established at a time prior to the Company’s initial public offering when TDS owned more than 90% of the Company’s outstanding capital stock and may not reflect terms that would be obtainable from an unrelated third party through arms-length negotiations. The principal arrangements that affect the Company’s operations are described in Item 13 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Management believes the method TDS uses to allocate common expenses is reasonable and that all expenses and costs applicable to the Company are reflected in the Company’s financial statements on a basis which is representative of what they would have been if the Company operated on a stand-alone basis.
The following persons are partners of Sidley Austin Brown & Wood, the principal law firm of the Company and its subsidiaries: Walter C. D. Carlson, a director of the Company, a director and non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of TDS and a trustee and beneficiary of a voting trust that controls TDS; William S. DeCarlo, the General Counsel of TDS and an Assistant Secretary of TDS and certain subsidiaries of TDS; and Stephen P. Fitzell, the General Counsel and an Assistant Secretary of the Company and the Assistant Secretary of certain other subsidiaries of TDS. Walter C. D. Carlson does not provide legal services to TDS, the Company or their subsidiaries.
-34-
PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 SAFE HARBOR CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition and other sections of this Quarterly Report to Shareholders contain statements that are not based on historical fact, including the words “believes”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “expects”, and similar words. These statements constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be significantly different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following risks:
The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Readers should evaluate any statements in light of these important factors.
-35-
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is subject to market rate risks due to fluctuations in interest rates and equity markets. The Company currently has both fixed-rate and variable-rate long-term debt instruments, with original maturities ranging from five to 30 years. Accordingly, fluctuations in interest rates can lead to significant fluctuations in the fair value of such instruments. As of June 30, 2003, the Company has not entered into financial derivatives to reduce its exposure to interest rate risks.
The Company maintains a portfolio of available for sale marketable equity securities, which resulted from the sale of non-strategic investments. The market value of these investments, principally VOD ADRs, amounted to $202.9 million at June 30, 2003 and $186.0 million at December 31, 2002. As of June 30, 2003, the Company had recorded an unrealized holding gain, net of tax, of $25.8 million in accumulated other comprehensive income. Management continues to review the valuation of the investments on a periodic basis. If management determines in the future that an unrealized loss is other than temporary, the loss will be recognized and recorded in the statement of operations.
The Company has entered into a number of forward contracts related to the marketable equity securities that it holds. The risk management objective of the forward contracts is to hedge the value of the marketable equity securities from losses due to decrease in the market prices of the securities (“downside limit”) while retaining a share of gains from increases in the market prices of such securities (“upside potential”). The downside risk is hedged at or above the accounting cost basis, thereby eliminating the other than temporary risk on the contracted securities.
Under the terms of the forward contracts, the Company will continue to own the contracted shares and will receive dividends paid on such contracted shares, if any. The forward contracts mature in May 2007 and, at the Company’s option, may be settled in shares of the respective security or in cash, pursuant to formulas that “collar” the price of the shares. The collars effectively limit the Company’s downside risk and upside potential on the contracted shares. The collars could be adjusted for any changes in dividends on the contracted shares. The forward contracts may be settled in shares of the marketable equity security or in cash upon expiration of the forward contract. If shares are delivered in the settlement of the forward contract, the Company would incur a current tax liability at the time of delivery based on the difference between the tax basis of the marketable equity securities delivered and the net amount realized through maturity. If the Company elects to settle in cash, it will be required to pay an amount in cash equal to the fair market value of the number of shares determined pursuant to the formula. If the Company elects to settle in shares, it will be required to deliver the number of shares of the contracted security determined pursuant to the formula.
Deferred taxes have been provided for the difference between the financial reporting basis and the income tax basis of the marketable equity securities and are included in deferred tax liabilities on the balance sheet. As of June 30, 2003, such deferred tax liabilities totaled $63.6 million.
The following table summarizes certain facts relating to the contracted securities as of June 30, 2003.
The following analysis presents the hypothetical change in the fair value of the Company’s marketable equity securities and derivative instruments at June 30, 2003, assuming the same hypothetical price fluctuations of plus and minus 10%, 20% and 30%. The table presents hypothetical information as required by Securities and Exchange Commission rules. Such information should not be inferred to suggest that the Company has any intention of selling any marketable securities or canceling any derivative instruments.
-36-
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Based on their evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of U.S. Cellular have concluded that U.S. Cellular’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)) are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by U.S. Cellular in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
(b) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
-37-
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
The Company is involved in a number of legal proceedings before the FCC and various state and federal courts. In some cases, the litigation involves disputes regarding rights to certain wireless telephone systems and other interests. The Company does not believe that any of these proceedings should have a material adverse impact on the Company.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security-Holders
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company , held on May 6, 2003, the following number of votes were cast for the matters indicated:
Item 5. Other Information
On August 1, 2003, the Company announced that it had completed a portion of its previously announced exchange of assets with AWE.
-38-
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
-39-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.