Ames National Corp. - 10-Q quarterly report FY

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[Mark One]

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number 0-32637

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

IOWA		42-1039071
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I. R. S. Employer Identification Number)

405 FIFTH STREET

AMES, IOWA 50010

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (515) 232-6251

NOT APPLICABLE

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this Chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

COMMON STOCK, $2.00 PAR VALUE	9,310,913
(Class)	(Shares Outstanding at October 31, 2013)

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION

INDEX

		Page

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	3

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	4

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	5

	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	6

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	7

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	9

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	28

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	48

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	48

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	48

Item 1.A.	Risk Factors	48

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	48

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	49

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	49

Item 5.	Other Information	49

Item 6.	Exhibits	49

	Signatures	50

Index

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,
ASSETS	2013			2012

Cash and due from banks	$	25,658,649		$	34,805,371
Interest bearing deposits in financial institutions		34,255,292			44,639,033
Securities available-for-sale		583,476,550			588,417,037
Loans receivable, net		528,706,450			510,125,880
Loans held for sale		627,754			1,030,180
Bank premises and equipment, net		12,072,845			12,233,464
Accrued income receivable		8,090,874			7,173,703
Other real estate owned		8,993,815			9,910,825
Deferred income taxes		4,103,206			-
Core deposit intangible, net		1,095,315			1,303,264
Goodwill		5,600,749			5,600,749
Other assets		551,320			2,452,593

Total assets	$	1,213,232,819		$	1,217,692,099

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

LIABILITIES
Deposits
Demand, noninterest bearing	$	165,723,905		$	182,033,279
NOW accounts		287,015,885			287,294,015
Savings and money market		283,671,827			279,774,197
Time, $100,000 and over		93,306,121			99,925,619
Other time		147,288,212			155,705,340
Total deposits		977,005,950			1,004,732,450

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		31,973,603			27,088,660
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances		37,558,364			14,611,035
Other long-term borrowings		20,000,000			20,000,000
Dividend payable		1,489,746			1,396,627
Deferred income taxes		-			1,632,560
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		3,851,551			3,495,032
Total liabilities		1,071,879,214			1,072,956,364

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Common stock, $2 par value, authorized 18,000,000 shares; issued 9,432,915 shares; outstanding 9,310,913 shares as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		18,865,830			18,865,830
Additional paid-in capital		22,651,222			22,651,222
Retained earnings		100,267,297			94,159,839
Accumulated other comprehensive income - net unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale		1,585,754			11,075,342
Treasury stock, at cost; 122,002 shares at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		(2,016,498	)		(2,016,498	)
Total stockholders' equity		141,353,605			144,735,735

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,213,232,819		$	1,217,692,099

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Index

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2013			2012		2013		2012

Interest income:
Loans, including fees	$	6,569,005		$	6,413,866	$	18,874,279	$	18,470,183
Securities:
Taxable		1,357,658			1,441,987		4,137,431		4,660,121
Tax-exempt		1,737,687			1,697,690		5,212,498		5,046,835
Interest bearing deposits and federal funds sold		86,126			113,149		304,172		371,328
Total interest income		9,750,476			9,666,692		28,528,380		28,548,467

Interest expense:
Deposits		924,219			1,097,372		2,919,660		3,419,854
Other borrowed funds		315,116			322,887		905,966		972,023
Total interest expense		1,239,335			1,420,259		3,825,626		4,391,877

Net interest income		8,511,141			8,246,433		24,702,754		24,156,590

Provision for loan losses		92,388			35,664		165,962		151,369

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		8,418,753			8,210,769		24,536,792		24,005,221

Noninterest income:
Trust services income		473,471			491,943		1,459,414		1,527,657
Service fees		402,062			429,958		1,179,889		1,161,170
Securities gains, net		204,738			220,230		637,979		538,298
Gain on sale of loans held for sale		268,658			440,232		969,578		1,082,126
Merchant and card fees		271,485			273,514		884,583		809,764
Other noninterest income		199,319			202,627		620,278		571,009
Total noninterest income		1,819,733			2,058,504		5,751,721		5,690,024

Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		3,288,760			3,112,396		9,736,156		9,293,203
Data processing		581,301			558,314		1,781,152		1,632,518
Occupancy expenses		358,739			362,217		1,103,920		1,069,972
FDIC insurance assessments		173,878			158,745		506,629		477,961
Professional fees		313,174			303,209		853,202		933,602
Business development		255,899			209,138		649,283		600,203
Other real estate owned (income) expense, net		(14,436	)		31,330		653,302		472,123
Core deposit intangible amortization		65,751			73,776		207,949		122,960
Other operating expenses, net		207,437			233,434		696,195		773,728
Total noninterest expense		5,230,503			5,042,559		16,187,788		15,376,270

Income before income taxes		5,007,983			5,226,714		14,100,725		14,318,975

Provision for income taxes		1,295,916			1,365,719		3,524,028		3,605,406

Net income	$	3,712,067		$	3,860,995	$	10,576,697	$	10,713,569

Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.40		$	0.41	$	1.14	$	1.15

Dividends declared per share	$	0.16		$	0.15	$	0.48	$	0.45

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Index

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012


Net income	$	3,712,067		$	3,860,995		$	10,576,697		$	10,713,569
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities before tax:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period		4,563,574			2,643,541			(14,424,859	)		5,212,820
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income		204,738			220,230			637,979			538,298
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax		4,358,836			2,423,311			(15,062,838	)		4,674,522
Tax effect related to other comprehensive income (loss)		(1,612,769	)		(869,031	)		5,573,250			(1,701,979	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		2,746,067			1,554,280			(9,489,588	)		2,972,543
Comprehensive income	$	6,458,134		$	5,415,275		$	1,087,109		$	13,686,112

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Index

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in-Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Taxes			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders' Equity

Balance, December 31, 2011	$	18,865,830	$	22,651,222	$	85,564,078		$	9,492,753		$	(2,016,498	)	$	134,557,385
Net income		-		-		10,713,569			-			-			10,713,569
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-			2,972,543			-			2,972,543
Cash dividends declared, $0.45 per share		-		-		(4,189,913	)		-			-			(4,189,913	)
Balance, September 30, 2012	$	18,865,830	$	22,651,222	$	92,087,734		$	12,465,296		$	(2,016,498	)	$	144,053,584

Balance, December 31, 2012	$	18,865,830	$	22,651,222	$	94,159,839		$	11,075,342		$	(2,016,498	)	$	144,735,735
Net income		-		-		10,576,697			-			-			10,576,697
Other comprehensive loss		-		-		-			(9,489,588	)		-			(9,489,588	)
Cash dividends declared, $0.48 per share		-		-		(4,469,239	)		-			-			(4,469,239	)
Balance, September 30, 2013	$	18,865,830	$	22,651,222	$	100,267,297		$	1,585,754		$	(2,016,498	)	$	141,353,605

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Index

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

	2013			2012

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	10,576,697		$	10,713,569
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		165,962			151,369
Provision for off-balance sheet commitments		25,700			19,000
Amortization, net, securities available-for-sale		4,881,915			4,649,555
Amortization of core deposit intangible asset		207,949			122,960
Depreciation		588,729			568,080
Credit for deferred income taxes		(162,516	)		(189,224	)
Securities gains, net		(637,979	)		(538,298	)
Impairment of other real estate owned		670,000			303,588
Loss (gain) on sale of other real estate owned, net		(32,601	)		46,867
Change in assets and liabilities:
Increase (decrease) in loans held for sale		402,426			(358,001	)
(Increase) in accrued income receivable		(917,171	)		(1,058,920	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		1,893,136			(4,897,038	)
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities		330,819			693,448
Net cash provided by operating activities		17,993,066			10,226,955

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of securities available-for-sale		(133,272,394	)		(175,323,766	)
Proceeds from sale of securities available-for-sale		28,314,668			19,612,753
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available-for-sale		90,110,257			91,016,839
Net (increase) decrease in interest bearing deposits in financial institutions		10,383,741			(2,018,139	)
Net (increase) in loans		(18,638,285	)		(5,205,943	)
Net proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned		493,360			840,725
Purchase of bank premises and equipment, net		(419,973	)		(370,766	)
Cash acquired, net of cash paid, for acquired bank offices		-			44,303,137
Net cash used in investing activities		(23,028,626	)		(27,145,160	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Increase (decrease) in deposits		(27,567,314	)		24,908,092
Increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase		4,884,943			(2,721,894	)
Proceeds from FHLB borrowings		2,000,000			-
Payments on FHLB borrowings		(2,052,671	)		(551,021	)
Proceeds from short-term FHLB borrowings, net		23,000,000			-
Dividends paid		(4,376,120	)		(4,003,695	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(4,111,162	)		17,631,482

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks		(9,146,722	)		713,277

CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
Beginning		34,805,371			22,829,291
Ending	$	25,658,649		$	23,542,568

Index

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

	2013		2012

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash payments for:
Interest	$	4,169,666	$	4,606,845
Income taxes		3,580,854		3,599,844

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Transfer of loans receivable to other real estate owned	$	213,749	$	1,592,446

Business Combination:
Fair value of loans receivable acquired	$	-	$	46,103,022
Fair value of bank premises and equipment acquired		-		864,500
Fair value of other tangible assets acquired		-		514,760
Goodwill		-		5,600,749
Core deposit intangible asset		-		1,500,000
Deposits assumed		-		98,766,558
Other liabilities assumed		-		119,610

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Index

AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

1. Significant Accounting Policies

The consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are unaudited. In the opinion of the management of Ames National Corporation (the "Company"), these financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, necessary to present fairly these consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results which may be expected for an entire year. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted in accordance with the requirements for interim financial statements. The interim financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the year-end audited financial statements contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Annual Report”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned banking subsidiaries (the “Banks”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Goodwill and core deposit intangible asset: Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill resulting from acquisitions is not amortized, but is tested for impairment annually or whenever events change and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that an impairment loss has occurred. Goodwill is tested for impairment using a two-step process that begins with an estimation of the fair value of a reporting unit. The second step, if necessary, measures the amount of impairment, if any.

Significant judgment is applied when goodwill is assessed for impairment. This judgment includes developing cash flow projections, selecting appropriate discount rates, identifying relevant market comparables, incorporating general economic and market conditions and selecting an appropriate control premium. At September 30, 2013, Company management has performed a goodwill impairment analysis and determined goodwill was not impaired.

The only other significant intangible asset is a core deposit intangible. The core deposit intangible asset is determined to have a definite life and is amortized over the estimated useful life. The core deposit intangible asset is a customer based relationship valuation attributed to the expectation of a lower net cost of these deposits versus alternative sources of funds. The core deposit intangible asset is reviewed for impairment whenever events occur or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. No such events have occurred and Company management continues to amortize over the original estimated useful life.

2. Office Acquisition

On April 27, 2012, Reliance State Bank (Reliance Bank) completed the purchase of two bank offices located in Garner and Klemme, Iowa (the “Acquisition”). This Acquisition was consistent with the Bank’s strategy to strengthen and expand its Iowa market share. The acquired assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. These offices were purchased for cash consideration of $5.4 million. As a result of the Acquisition, the Company recorded a core deposit intangible asset of $1,500,000 and goodwill of $5,601,000. The results of operations for this Acquisition have been included since the transaction date of April 27, 2012.

Index

The following table summarizes the fair value of the total consideration transferred as a part of the Acquisition as well as the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the effective date of the transaction.

	April 27,
	2012

Cash consideration transferred	$	5,400,000

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

Cash	$	49,703,137
Loans receivable		46,103,022
Accrued interest receivable		514,760
Bank premises and equipment		864,500
Core deposit intangible asset		1,500,000
Deposits		(98,766,558	)
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		(119,610	)

Total identifiable net liabilities	$	(200,749	)

Goodwill	$	5,600,749

On April 27, 2012, the contractual balance of loans receivable acquired was $46,972,000 and the contractual balance of the deposits assumed was $98,109,000. Loans receivable acquired include agricultural real estate, commercial real estate, 1-4 family real estate, commercial operating, agricultural operating and consumer loans determined to be pass rated.

The core deposit intangible asset is amortized to expense on a declining basis over a period of seven years. The loan market valuation is accreted to income on a declining basis over a nine year period. The time deposits market valuation is amortized to expense on a declining basis over a three year period.

3. Dividends

On August 14, 2013, the Company declared a cash dividend on its common stock, payable on November 15, 2013 to stockholders of record as of November 1, 2013, equal to $0.16 per share.

4. Earnings Per Share

Earnings per share amounts were calculated using the weighted average shares outstanding during the periods presented. The weighted average outstanding shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were 9,310,913. The Company had no potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the periods presented.

5. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. No material changes in the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements have occurred since December 31, 2012.

Index

6. Fair Value Measurements

Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are required to be classified and disclosed according to the process for determining fair value. There are three levels of determining fair value.

Level 1: Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices, unadjusted, for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and shall be used to measure fair value whenever available.

Level 2: Inputs to the valuation methodology include: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted process for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatility, prepayment speeds, credit risk); or inputs derived principally from or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using discounted cash flow methodologies, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

Index

The following table presents the balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

2013

U.S. government agencies	$	54,040,000	$	-	$	54,040,000	$	-
U.S. government mortgage-backed securities		164,187,000		-		164,187,000		-
State and political subdivisions		315,083,000		-		315,083,000		-
Corporate bonds		45,473,000		-		45,473,000		-
Equity securities, financial industry common stock		717,000		717,000		-		-
Equity securities, other		3,977,000		-		3,977,000		-

	$	583,477,000	$	717,000	$	582,760,000	$	-

2012

U.S. government agencies	$	48,687,000	$	-	$	48,687,000	$	-
U.S. government mortgage-backed securities		191,957,000		-		191,957,000		-
State and political subdivisions		309,573,000		-		309,573,000		-
Corporate bonds		34,761,000		-		34,761,000		-
Equity securities, financial industry common stock		630,000		630,000		-		-
Equity securities, other		2,809,000		-		2,809,000		-

	$	588,417,000	$	630,000	$	587,787,000	$	-

Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, as well as U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. Other securities available-for-sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the security’s terms and conditions, among other things.

Index

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, they are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The following table presents the assets carried on the balance sheet (after specific reserves) by caption and by level with the valuation hierarchy as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Description	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

2013

Loans receivable	$	750,000	$	-	$	-	$	750,000
Other real estate owned		8,994,000		-		-		8,994,000

Total	$	9,744,000	$	-	$	-	$	9,744,000

2012

Loans receivable	$	2,732,000	$	-	$	-	$	2,732,000
Other real estate owned		9,911,000		-		-		9,911,000

Total	$	12,643,000	$	-	$	-	$	12,643,000

Loans Receivable: Loans in the tables above consist of impaired credits held for investment. In accordance with the loan impairment guidance, impairment was measured based on the fair value of collateral less estimated selling costs for collateral dependent loans. Fair value for impaired loans is based upon appraised values of collateral adjusted for trends observed in the market. A valuation allowance was recorded for the excess of the loan’s recorded investment over the amounts determined by the collateral value method. This valuation is a component of the allowance for loan losses. The Company considers these fair value measurements as level 3.

Other Real Estate Owned: Other real estate owned in the table above consists of real estate obtained through foreclosure. Other real estate owned is recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs, at the date of transfer. Subsequent to the transfer, other real estate owned is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated selling costs. The carrying value of other real estate owned is not re-measured to fair value on a recurring basis but is subject to fair value adjustments when the carrying value exceeds the fair value less estimated selling costs. Management uses appraised values and adjusts for trends observed in the market and for disposition costs in determining the value of other real estate owned. A valuation allowance was recorded for the excess of the asset’s recorded investment over the amount determined by the fair value, less estimated selling costs. This valuation allowance is a component of the allowance for other real estate owned. The valuation allowance was $4,644,000 and $4,004,000 as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company considers these fair values level 3.

Index

The significant inputs used in the fair value measurements for Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2013 are as follows:

	September 30, 2013
	Fair Value		Valuation Techniques	Range of Unobservable Inputs	Range (Average)

Impaired Loans	$	750,000	Evaluation of collateral	Estimation of value	NM*

Other real estate owned	$	8,994,000	Appraisal	Appraisal adjustment	6%-10% (8%)

* Not Meaningful. Evaluations of the underlying assets are completed for each impaired loan with a specific reserve. The types of collateral vary widely and could include accounts receivables, inventory, a variety of equipment and real estate. Collateral evaluations are reviewed and discounted as appropriate based on knowledge of the specific type of collateral. In the case of real estate, an independent appraisal may be obtained. Types of discounts considered included aging of receivables, condition of the collateral, potential market for the collateral and estimated disposal costs. These discounts will vary from loan to loan, thus providing a range would not be meaningful.

GAAP requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis are discussed above. The methodologies for other financial assets and financial liabilities are discussed below.

Fair value of financial instruments:

Disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, for which it is practicable to estimate that value, is required whether or not recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. In cases in which quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimate of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instruments. Certain financial instruments with a fair value that is not practicable to estimate and all non-financial instruments are excluded from the disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not necessarily represent the underlying value of the Company.

The following disclosures represent financial instruments in which the ending balances at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are not carried at fair value in their entirety on the consolidated balance sheets.

Cash and due from banks and interest bearing deposits in financial institutions: The recorded amount of these assets approximates fair value.

Securities available-for-sale: Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the securities credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions.

Loans held for sale: The fair value of loans held for sale is based on prevailing market prices.

Index

Loans receivable: The fair value of loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates, which reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan. The estimate of maturity is based on the historical experience, with repayments for each loan classification modified, as required, by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions. The effect of nonperforming loans is considered in assessing the credit risk inherent in the fair value estimate.

Deposit liabilities: Fair values of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts, and money market accounts, are equal to the amount payable on demand as of the respective balance sheet date. Fair values of certificates of deposit are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The fair value estimates do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market.

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase: The carrying amounts of securities sold under agreements to repurchase approximate fair value because of the generally short-term nature of the instruments.

FHLB advances and other long-term borrowings: Fair values of FHLB advances and other long-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on interest rates currently being offered with similar terms.

Accrued income receivable and accrued interest payable: The carrying amounts of accrued income receivable and accrued interest payable approximate fair value.

Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit: The fair values of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreement and credit worthiness of the counterparties. The carry value and fair value of the commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are not considered significant.

Limitations: Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Index

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as described above were as follows:


		September 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Fair Value Hierarchy Level	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value

Financial assets:
Cash and due from banks	Level 1	$	25,658,649	$	25,659,000	$	34,805,371	$	34,805,000
Interest bearing deposits	Level 1		34,255,292		34,255,000		44,639,033		44,639,000
Securities available-for-sale	See previous table		583,476,550		583,477,000		588,417,037		588,417,000
Loans receivable, net	Level 2		528,706,450		527,901,000		510,125,880		514,047,000
Loans held for sale	Level 2		627,754		628,000		1,030,180		1,030,000
Accrued income receivable	Level 1		8,090,874		8,091,000		7,173,703		7,174,000
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	Level 2	$	977,005,950	$	979,425,000	$	1,004,732,450	$	1,008,013,000
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	Level 1		31,973,603		31,974,000		27,088,660		27,089,000
FHLB advances	Level 2		37,558,364		38,399,000		14,611,035		15,997,000
Other long-term borrowings	Level 2		20,000,000		22,025,000		20,000,000		22,404,000
Accrued interest payable	Level 1		567,571		568,000		752,425		752,000

The methodologies used to determine fair value as of September 30, 2013 did not change from the methodologies used in the December 31, 2012 Annual Report.

Index

7. Debt and Equity Securities

The amortized cost of securities available-for-sale and their fair values are summarized below:

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
September 30, 2013:
U.S. government agencies	$	53,751,511	$	1,387,809	$	(1,099,568	)	$	54,039,752
U.S. government mortgage-backed securities		161,818,718		3,255,891		(887,542	)		164,187,067
State and political subdivisions		313,930,908		5,207,832		(4,055,409	)		315,083,331
Corporate bonds		46,851,545		746,382		(2,125,327	)		45,472,600
Equity securities, financial industry common stock		629,700		87,000		-			716,700
Equity securities, other		3,977,100		-		-			3,977,100
	$	580,959,482	$	10,684,914	$	(8,167,846	)	$	583,476,550

			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
December 31, 2012:
U.S. government agencies	$	46,264,590	$	2,422,445	$	-		$	48,687,035
U.S. government mortgage-backed securities		187,174,681		4,947,586		(165,076	)		191,957,191
State and political subdivisions		300,025,960		9,963,545		(416,544	)		309,572,961
Corporate bonds		33,933,600		1,098,168		(270,218	)		34,761,550
Equity securities, financial industry common stock		629,700		-		-			629,700
Equity securities, other		2,808,600		-		-			2,808,600
	$	570,837,131	$	18,431,744	$	(851,838	)	$	588,417,037

The proceeds, gains and losses from securities available-for-sale are summarized as follows:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2013		2012		2013		2012
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale	$	12,696,659	$	9,580,189	$	28,314,668	$	19,612,753
Gross realized gains on securities available-for-sale		261,219		222,096		695,972		540,394
Gross realized losses on securities available-for-sale		56,481		1,866		57,993		2,096
Tax provision applicable to net realized gains on securities available-for-sale		76,000		82,000		238,000		201,000

Index

Unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position are summarized as follows:

	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
September 30, 2013:

Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. government agencies	$	19,755,860	$	(1,099,568	)	$	-	$	-		$	19,755,860	$	(1,099,568	)
U.S. government mortgage-backed securities		53,188,237		(887,542	)		-		-			53,188,237		(887,542	)
State and political subdivisions		113,736,391		(3,922,728	)		3,223,879		(132,681	)		116,960,270		(4,055,409	)
Corporate bonds		28,706,996		(1,791,764	)		3,775,824		(333,563	)		32,482,820		(2,125,327	)
	$	215,387,484	$	(7,701,602	)	$	6,999,703	$	(466,244	)	$	222,387,187	$	(8,167,846	)

	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
December 31, 2012:

Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. government mortgage-backed securities	$	20,972,453	$	(165,076	)	$	-	$	-		$	20,972,453	$	(165,076	)
State and political subdivisions		30,651,869		(410,357	)		578,145		(6,187	)		31,230,014		(416,544	)
Corporate bonds		13,979,171		(270,218	)		-		-			13,979,171		(270,218	)
	$	65,603,493	$	(845,651	)	$	578,145	$	(6,187	)	$	66,181,638	$	(851,838	)

Gross unrealized losses on debt securities totaled $8,167,846 as of September 30, 2013. These unrealized losses are generally due to changes in interest rates or general market conditions. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and industry analysts’ reports. Management concluded that the gross unrealized losses on debt securities were temporary. Due to potential changes in conditions, it is at least reasonably possible that changes in fair values and management’s assessments will occur in the near term and that such changes could materially affect the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements.

Index

8. Loan Receivable and Credit Disclosures

Activity in the allowance for loan losses, on a disaggregated basis, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows: (in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
				1-4 Family
	Construction			Residential			Commercial		Agricultural							Consumer
	Real Estate			Real Estate			Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial			Agricultural		and Other			Total
Balance, June 30, 2013	$	332		$	1,456		$	3,002	$	591	$	1,343		$	921	$	174		$	7,819
Provision (credit) for loan losses		(111	)		40			162		21		(78	)		68		(10	)		92
Recoveries of loans charged-off		-			2			17		-		1			-		4			24
Loans charged-off		-			(18	)		-		-		-			-		(14	)		(32	)
Balance, September 30 2013	$	221		$	1,480		$	3,181	$	612	$	1,266		$	989	$	154		$	7,903

	Nine Months Ended September 30 2013
				1-4 Family
	Construction			Residential			Commercial		Agricultural							Consumer
	Real Estate			Real Estate			Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial			Agricultural		and Other			Total
Balance, December 31, 2012	$	375		$	1,433		$	2,859	$	523	$	1,461		$	945	$	177		$	7,773
Provision (credit) for loan losses		(154	)		88			305		89		(198	)		44		(8	)		166
Recoveries of loans charged-off		-			40			17		-		3			-		12			72
Loans charged-off		-			(81	)		-		-		-			-		(27	)		(108	)
Balance, September 30, 2013	$	221		$	1,480		$	3,181	$	612	$	1,266		$	989	$	154		$	7,903

	Three Months Ended September 30 2012
				1-4 Family
	Construction			Residential			Commercial		Agricultural								Consumer
	Real Estate			Real Estate			Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial			Agricultural			and Other			Total
Balance, June 30, 2012	$	739		$	1,473		$	2,912	$	466	$	1,406		$	820		$	205		$	8,021
Provision (credit) for loan losses		(48	)		50			48		10		(10	)		(8	)		(6	)		36
Recoveries of loans charged-off		-			2			-		-		1			-			8			11
Loans charged-off		-			(40	)		-		-		-			-			(19	)		(59	)
Balance, September 30, 2012	$	691		$	1,485		$	2,960	$	476	$	1,397		$	812		$	188		$	8,009

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
				1-4 Family
	Construction			Residential			Commercial		Agricultural								Consumer
	Real Estate			Real Estate			Real Estate		Real Estate			Commercial			Agricultural		and Other			Total
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	793		$	1,402		$	2,859	$	501		$	1,352		$	764	$	234		$	7,905
Provision (credit) for loan losses		(102	)		127			101		(25	)		51			48		(49	)		151
Recoveries of loans charged-off		-			5			-		-			6			-		41			52
Loans charged-off		-			(49	)		-		-			(12	)		-		(38	)		(99	)
Balance, September 30, 2012	$	691		$	1,485		$	2,960	$	476		$	1,397		$	812	$	188		$	8,009

Index

Allowance for loan losses disaggregated on the basis of impairment analysis method as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows: (in thousands)

2013
			1-4 Family
	Construction		Residential		Commercial		Agricultural						Consumer
	Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		and Other		Total
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	-	$	122	$	20	$	-	$	330	$	5	$	-	$	477
Collectively evaluated for impairment		221		1,358		3,161		612		936		984		154		7,426
Balance September 30, 2013	$	221	$	1,480	$	3,181	$	612	$	1,266	$	989	$	154	$	7,903

2012
			1-4 Family
	Construction		Residential		Commercial		Agricultural						Consumer
	Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		and Other		Total
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	100	$	110	$	86	$	-	$	400	$	6	$	-	$	702
Collectively evaluated for impairment		275		1,323		2,773		523		1,061		939		177		7,071
Balance December 31, 2012	$	375	$	1,433	$	2,859	$	523	$	1,461	$	945	$	177	$	7,773

Loans receivable disaggregated on the basis of impairment analysis method as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):

2013
			1-4 Family
	Construction		Residential		Commercial		Agricultural						Consumer
	Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		and Other		Total
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	736	$	781	$	541	$	-	$	821	$	5	$	13	$	2,897
Collectively evaluated for impairment		12,920		108,140		205,981		46,394		74,606		71,477		14,218		533,736

Balance September 30, 2013	$	13,656	$	108,921	$	206,522	$	46,394	$	75,427	$	71,482	$	14,231	$	536,633

2012
			1-4 Family
	Construction		Residential		Commercial		Agricultural						Consumer
	Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		and Other		Total
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,493	$	1,121	$	3,280	$	-	$	710	$	6	$	4	$	6,614
Collectively evaluated for impairment		15,584		103,147		175,380		43,868		79,554		77,477		16,336		511,346

Balance December 31, 2012	$	17,077	$	104,268	$	178,660	$	43,868	$	80,264	$	77,483	$	16,340	$	517,960

Index

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payment of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. The Company will apply its normal loan review procedures to identify loans that should be evaluated for impairment. The following is a recap of impaired loans, on a disaggregated basis, at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012: (in thousands)

	September 30, 2013						December 31, 2012
			Unpaid						Unpaid
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Principal		Related
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Balance		Allowance
With no specific reserve recorded:
Real estate - construction	$	736	$	736	$	-	$	1,060	$	1,060	$	-
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		405		405		-		655		655		-
Real estate - commercial		495		495		-		1,381		1,381		-
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		21		21		-		80		80		-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer and other		13		13		-		4		4		-
Total loans with no specific reserve:		1,670		1,670		-		3,180		3,180		-

With an allowance recorded:
Real estate - construction		-		-		-		433		433		100
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		376		376		122		466		466		110
Real estate - commercial		46		46		20		1,899		1,899		86
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		800		800		330		630		630		400
Agricultural		5		5		5		6		6		6
Consumer and other		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total loans with specific reserve:		1,227		1,227		477		3,434		3,434		702

Total
Real estate - construction		736		736		-		1,493		1,493		100
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		781		781		122		1,121		1,121		110
Real estate - commercial		541		541		20		3,280		3,280		86
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		821		821		330		710		710		400
Agricultural		5		5		5		6		6		6
Consumer and other		13		13		-		4		4		-

	$	2,897	$	2,897	$	477	$	6,614	$	6,614	$	702

Index

The following is a recap of the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012: (in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2013				2012
	Average		Interest		Average		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized
With no specific reserve recorded:
Real estate - construction	$	805	$	-	$	1,424	$	2
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		478		8		820		-
Real estate - commercial		1,382		207		599		-
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-
Commercial		41		12		39		-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-
Consumer and other		7		-		-		-
Total loans with no specific reserve:		2,713		227		2,882		2

With an allowance recorded:
Real estate - construction		195		93		530		-
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		334		-		659		-
Real estate - commercial		46		-		1,947		-
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-
Commercial		813		-		634		-
Agricultural		5		-		3		-
Consumer and other		-		-		6		-
Total loans with specific reserve:		1,393		93		3,779		-

Total
Real estate - construction		1,000		93		1,954		2
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		812		8		1,479		-
Real estate - commercial		1,428		207		2,546		-
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-
Commercial		854		12		673		-
Agricultural		5		-		3		-
Consumer and other		7		-		6		-

	$	4,106	$	320	$	6,661	$	2

Index

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013				2012
	Average		Interest		Average		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized
With no specific reserve recorded:
Real estate - construction	$	919	$	-	$	1,542	$	4
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		569		8		1,393		14
Real estate - commercial		1,189		209		770		5
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-
Commercial		58		12		20		-
Agricultural		-		-		-		-
Consumer and other		5		-		-		-
Total loans with no specific reserve:		2,740		229		3,725		23

With an allowance recorded:
Real estate - construction		313		93		581		-
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		420		-		487		-
Real estate - commercial		1,147		-		1,843		-
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-
Commercial		745		-		611		-
Agricultural		6		-		2		-
Consumer and other		-		-		3		-
Total loans with specific reserve:		2,631		93		3,527		-

Total
Real estate - construction		1,232		93		2,123		4
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		989		8		1,880		14
Real estate - commercial		2,336		209		2,613		5
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-
Commercial		803		12		631		-
Agricultural		6		-		2		-
Consumer and other		5		-		3		-

	$	5,371	$	322	$	7,252	$	23

The interest foregone on nonaccrual loans for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $73,000 and $89,000, respectively. The interest foregone on nonaccrual loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $239,000 and $322,000, respectively.

The Company had loans meeting the definition of a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) of $1,635,000 as of September 30, 2013, of which all were included in impaired loans, $1,445,000 was included as nonaccrual loans and $190,000 was on accrual status. The Company had TDR of $5,105,000 as of December 31, 2012, all of which were included in impaired loans, $4,058,000 was included as nonaccrual loans and $1,047,000 was on accrual status.

Index

The following table sets forth information on the Company’s TDRs, on a disaggregated basis, occurring in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012: (dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2013						2012
			Pre-Modification		Post-Modification				Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
			Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded
	Contracts		Investment		Investment		Contracts		Investment		Investment

Real estate - construction		-	$	-	$	-		2	$	195	$	195
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		-		-		-		-		-		-
Real estate - commercial		-		-		-		-		-		-
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		-		-		-		1		28		28
Agricultural		-		-		-		1		6		6
Consumer and other		-		-		-		-		-		-

		-	$	-	$	-		4	$	229	$	229

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013						2012
			Pre-Modification		Post-Modification				Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
			Outstanding		Outstanding				Outstanding		Outstanding
	Number of		Recorded		Recorded		Number of		Recorded		Recorded
	Contracts		Investment		Investment		Contracts		Investment		Investment

Real estate - construction		-	$	-	$	-		2	$	195	$	195
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		-		-		-		2		391		401
Real estate - commercial		-		-		-		2		2,697		2,697
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		1		130		130		2		132		132
Agricultural		-		-		-		1		6		6
Consumer and other		-		-		-		-		-		-

		1	$	130	$	130		9	$	3,421	$	3,431

There was no new TDR activity in the three months ended September 30, 2013. However, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company restructured one loan by granting concessions to a borrower experiencing financial difficulties. The loan was restructured with a collateral shortfall.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company granted concessions to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties, for four and nine loans respectively. The two construction real estate loans were restructured by not requiring curtailments. The two commercial loans were restructured by reducing periodic payments and extending amortization. One one-to-four family real estate loan was restructured at a below market interest rate. One one-to-four family real estate loan was restructured to include previously unpaid interest in the new loan balance. One commercial real estate and the agricultural loans were restructured to extend the amortization of the loan beyond normal terms. One commercial real estate loan was restructured as an interest only loan for a period of time.

Two TDR loans modified during the twelve months ended September 30, 2013 had payment defaults. These modified TDR loans had a balance as of September 30, 2013 of $132,000.

Index

One TDR loan modified during the twelve months ended September 30, 2012 had a payment default. The modified TDR loan had a balance as of September 30, 2012 of $294,000 and a specific reserve of $80,000. In December 2012, the collateral securing this loan was repossessed and the balance of $100,000 charged off.

A TDR loan is considered to have payment default when it is past due 60 days or more.

There was no financial impact for specific reserves or from charge-offs for the TDR loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

An aging analysis of the recorded investments in loans, on a disaggregated basis, as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, is as follows: (in thousands)

2013
			90 Days								90 Days
	30-89		or Greater		Total						or Greater
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Current		Total		Accruing

Real estate - construction	$	25	$	-	$	25	$	13,631	$	13,656	$	-
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		744		342		1,086		107,835		108,921		27
Real estate - commercial		-		46		46		206,476		206,522		-
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		46,394		46,394		-
Commercial		333		283		616		74,811		75,427		57
Agricultural		-		-		-		71,482		71,482		-
Consumer and other		26		12		38		14,193		14,231		-

	$	1,128	$	683	$	1,811	$	534,822	$	536,633	$	84

2012
			90 Days								90 Days
	30-89		or Greater		Total						or Greater
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Current		Total		Accruing

Real estate - construction	$	5	$	-	$	5	$	17,072	$	17,077	$	-
Real estate - 1 to 4 family residential		973		275		1,248		103,020		104,268		-
Real estate - commercial		17		135		152		178,508		178,660		-
Real estate - agricultural		-		-		-		43,868		43,868		-
Commercial		449		-		449		79,815		80,264		-
Agricultural		71		-		71		77,412		77,483		-
Consumer and other		57		4		61		16,279		16,340		-

	$	1,572	$	414	$	1,986	$	515,974	$	517,960	$	-

Index

The credit risk profile by internally assigned grade, on a disaggregated basis, at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows: (in thousands)

2013
	Construction		Commercial		Agricultural
	Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		Total

Pass	$	7,322	$	167,275	$	43,851	$	63,146	$	68,838	$	350,432
Watch		2,495		23,122		2,244		9,111		2,258		39,230
Special Mention		-		763		-		859		-		1,622
Substandard		3,103		14,691		299		1,620		381		20,094
Substandard-Impaired		736		671		-		691		5		2,103

	$	13,656	$	206,522	$	46,394	$	75,427	$	71,482	$	413,481

2012
	Construction		Commercial		Agricultural
	Real Estate		Real Estate		Real Estate		Commercial		Agricultural		Total

Pass	$	8,127	$	141,206	$	40,201	$	66,390	$	75,920	$	331,844
Watch		3,209		17,456		2,931		11,321		1,093		36,010
Special Mention		741		10,119		-		30		-		10,890
Substandard		3,507		6,599		736		1,813		464		13,119
Substandard-Impaired		1,493		3,280		-		710		6		5,489

	$	17,077	$	178,660	$	43,868	$	80,264	$	77,483	$	397,352

The credit risk profile based on payment activity, on a disaggregated basis, at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is as follows:

2013
	1-4 Family
	Residential		Consumer
	Real Estate		and Other		Total

Performing	$	108,262	$	14,218	$	122,480
Non-performing		659		13		672

	$	108,921	$	14,231	$	123,152

2012
	1-4 Family
	Residential		Consumer
	Real Estate		and Other		Total

Performing	$	103,342	$	16,336	$	119,678
Non-performing		926		4		930

	$	104,268	$	16,340	$	120,608

Index

9. Other Real Estate Owned

The following table provides the composition of other real estate owned as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	2013		2012

Construction and land development	$	6,750,503	$	7,534,664
1 to 4 family residential real estate		1,428,935		1,561,784
Commercial real estate		814,377		814,377

	$	8,993,815	$	9,910,825

The Company is actively marketing the assets referred in the table above. Management uses appraised values and adjusts for trends observed in the market and for disposition costs in determining the value of other real estate owned. The assets above are primarily located in the metropolitan Des Moines, Iowa and Ames, Iowa areas.

10. Goodwill

Goodwill recognized in the Acquisition was primarily attributable to an expanded market share and economies of scale expected from combining the operations of the Garner and Klemme offices with Reliance Bank. The goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment at least annually. For income tax purposes, goodwill is amortized over 15 years.

11. Core deposit intangible asset

In conjunction with the Acquisition, the Corporation recorded $1.5 million in core deposit intangible asset. The following sets forth the carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of core deposit intangible assets:

	2013
	Gross		Accumulated
	Amount		Amortization

Core deposit intangible asset	$	1,500,000	$	404,685

There were no additions of other significant acquired intangible assets during 2013 or 2012.

Amortization expense on core deposit intangible assets totaled $65,751 and $73,776 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Amortization expense on core deposit intangible assets totaled $207,949 and $122,960 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Index

Estimated remaining amortization expense on core deposit intangible for the years ending is as follows:

2013	$	65,751
2014		244,000
2015		217,500
2016		193,864
2017		172,768
2018		152,732
2019 and thereafter		48,700

12. Subsequent Events

Management evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued. There were no significant events or transactions occurring after September 30, 2013, but prior to November 8, 2013, that provided additional evidence about conditions that existed at September 30, 2013. There were no significant events or transactions that provided evidence about conditions that did not exist at September 30, 2013.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

Ames National Corporation (the “Company”) is a bank holding company established in 1975 that owns and operates five bank subsidiaries in central Iowa (the “Banks”). The following discussion is provided for the consolidated operations of the Company and its Banks, First National Bank, Ames, Iowa (First National), State Bank & Trust Co. (State Bank), Boone Bank & Trust Co. (Boone Bank), Reliance State Bank (Reliance Bank), and United Bank & Trust NA (United Bank). The purpose of this discussion is to focus on significant factors affecting the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

The Company does not engage in any material business activities apart from its ownership of the Banks. Products and services offered by the Banks are for commercial and consumer purposes including loans, deposits and trust services. The Banks also offer investment services through a third-party broker-dealer. The Company employs twelve individuals to assist with financial reporting, human resources, audit, compliance, marketing, technology systems and the coordination of management activities, in addition to 195 full-time equivalent individuals employed by the Banks.

The Company’s primary competitive strategy is to utilize seasoned and competent Bank management and local decision making authority to provide customers with faster response times and more flexibility in the products and services offered. This strategy is viewed as providing an opportunity to increase revenues through creating a competitive advantage over other financial institutions. The Company also strives to remain operationally efficient to provide better profitability while enabling the Company to offer more competitive loan and deposit rates.

The principal sources of Company revenues and cash flow are: (i) interest and fees earned on loans made by the Company and Banks; (ii) interest on fixed income investments held by the Company and Banks; (iii) fees on trust services provided by those Banks exercising trust powers; (iv) service charges on deposit accounts maintained at the Banks and (v) gain on sale of loans held for sale. The Company’s principal expenses are: (i) interest expense on deposit accounts and other borrowings; (ii) provision for loan losses; (iii) salaries and employee benefits; (iv) data processing costs associated with maintaining the Banks’ loan and deposit functions; and (v) occupancy expenses for maintaining the Banks’ facilities. The largest component contributing to the Company’s net income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on earning assets (primarily loans and investments) and interest paid on interest bearing liabilities (primarily deposits and other borrowings). One of management’s principal functions is to manage the spread between interest earned on earning assets and interest paid on interest bearing liabilities in an effort to maximize net interest income while maintaining an appropriate level of interest rate risk.

Index

The Company had net income of $3,712,000, or $0.40 per share, for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to net income of $3,861,000, or $0.41 per share, for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Total equity capital as of September 30, 2013 totaled $141.4 million or 11.7% of total assets.

The decrease in quarterly earnings can be primarily attributed to lower gains on the sale of loans held for sale and higher salaries and employee benefits, offset in part by an increase in net interest income.

Net loan charge-offs totaled $8,000 and $48,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The provision for loan losses totaled $92,000 and $36,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company had net income of $10,577,000, or $1.14 per share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to net income of $10,714,000, or $1.15 per share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

The decrease in nine month earnings can be primarily attributed to higher noninterest expense, offset in part by an increase in net interest income. The Acquisition contributed to increases in net interest income, noninterest income (excluding securities gains) and noninterest expense.

Net loan charge-offs totaled $36,000 and $47,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The provision for loan losses totaled $166,000 and $151,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The following management discussion and analysis will provide a review of important items relating to:

· Challenges

· Key Performance Indicators and Industry Results

· Critical Accounting Policies

· Income Statement Review

· Balance Sheet Review

· Asset Quality and Credit Risk Management

· Liquidity and Capital Resources

· Forward-Looking Statements and Business Risks

Challenges

Management has identified certain events or circumstances that may negatively impact the Company’s financial condition and results of operations in the future and is attempting to position the Company to best respond to those challenges.

· If Interest rates increase significantly over a relatively short period of time due to improving national employment or higher inflationary pressures, the interest rate environment may present a challenge to the Company. Increases in interest rates may negatively impact the Company’s net interest margin if interest expense increases more quickly than interest income. The Company’s earning assets (primarily its loan and investment portfolio) have longer maturities than its interest bearing liabilities (primarily deposits and other borrowings); therefore, in a rising interest rate environment, interest expense may increase more quickly than interest income as the interest bearing liabilities reprice more quickly than earning assets. In response to this challenge, the Banks model quarterly the changes in income that would result from various changes in interest rates. Management believes Bank earning assets have the appropriate maturity and repricing characteristics to optimize earnings and the Banks’ interest rate risk positions.

Index

· If market interest rates in the three to five year time horizons remain at historically low levels as compared to the short term interest rates, the interest rate environment may present a challenge to the Company. The Company’s earning assets will reprice at lower interest rates, but deposits, due to already low actual interest rate paid, will not reprice at significantly lower interest rates; therefore, continued compression of interest rate spreads may decrease net interest income in the future. Management believes Bank earning assets have the appropriate maturity and repricing characteristics to optimize earnings and the Banks’ interest rate risk positions.

· Other real estate owned amounted to $9.0 million and $9.9 million as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Other real estate owned expense amounted to $653,000 and $472,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Management obtains independent appraisals or performs evaluations to determine that these properties are carried at the lower of the new cost basis or fair value less cost to sell. It is at least reasonably possible that change in fair values will occur in the near term and that such changes could have a negative impact on the Company’s earnings.

· The full compliance burden and impact on the Company’s operations and profitability with respect to the Dodd-Frank Act are currently unknown, as the Dodd-Frank Act delegates to various federal agencies the task of implementing its many provisions through regulation. Hundreds of new federal regulations, studies and reports are required under the Dodd-Frank Act and not all of them have been finalized. Although certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have been implemented, federal rules and policies in this area will be further developing for months and years to come. Based on the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and anticipated implementing regulations, it is highly likely that Banks, as well as the Company, will be subject to significantly increased regulation and compliance obligations that will expose the Company to higher costs as well as noncompliance risk and consequences.

· The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “Bureau”), established under the Dodd-Frank Act, has broad rulemaking authority to administer and carry out the purposes and objectives of the “Federal consumer financial laws, and to prevent evasions thereof” with respect to all financial institutions that offer financial products and services to consumers. The Bureau is also authorized to prescribe rules, applicable to any covered person or service provider, identifying and prohibiting acts or practices that are “unfair, deceptive, or abusive” in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service (“UDAAP authority”). The term “abusive” is new and untested, and because Bureau officials have indicated that compliance will be achieved through enforcement rather than the issuance of regulations, the Company cannot predict to what extent the Bureau’s future actions will have on the banking industry or the Company. The full reach and impact of the Bureau’s broad new rulemaking powers and UDAAP authority on the operations of financial institutions offering consumer financial products or services is currently unknown. Notwithstanding the foregoing, insured depository institutions with assets of $10 billion or less (such as the Banks) will continue to be supervised and examined by their primary federal regulators, rather than the Bureau, with respect to compliance with federal consumer protection laws.

Index

Key Performance Indicators and Industry Results

Certain key performance indicators for the Company and the industry are presented in the following chart. The industry figures are compiled by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and are derived from 6,940 commercial banks and savings institutions insured by the FDIC. Management reviews these indicators on a quarterly basis for purposes of comparing the Company’s performance from quarter-to-quarter against the industry as a whole.

Selected Indicators for the Company and the Industry

	3 Months			9 Months
	Ended			Ended			6 Months ended						Years Ended December 31,
	September 30, 2013						June 30, 2013						2012						2011
	Company			Company			Company			Industry*			Company			Industry*			Company			Industry

Return on assets		1.24	%		1.15	%		1.11	%		1.15	%		1.24	%		1.00	%		1.38	%		0.88	%

Return on equity		10.77	%		9.86	%		9.42	%		10.22	%		10.08	%		8.92	%		10.82	%		7.86	%

Net interest margin		3.28	%		3.16	%		3.10	%		3.27	%		3.35	%		3.42	%		3.60	%		3.60	%

Efficiency ratio		50.63	%		53.15	%		54.45	%		58.76	%		52.33	%		61.60	%		49.80	%		61.37	%

Capital ratio		11.47	%		11.70	%		11.82	%		9.34	%		12.31	%		9.15	%		12.75	%		9.09	%

*Latest available data

Key performances indicators include:

· Return on Assets

This ratio is calculated by dividing net income by average assets. It is used to measure how effectively the assets of the Company are being utilized in generating income. The Company's annualized return on average assets was 1.24% and 1.32% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease in this ratio in 2013 from the previous period is primarily the result of an increase in average assets and a decrease in net income. This increase in new or repriced earning assets generated less interest income given the low interest rate environment.

· Return on Equity

This ratio is calculated by dividing net income by average equity. It is used to measure the net income or return the Company generated for the shareholders’ equity investment in the Company. The Company's return on average equity was 10.77% and 10.86% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease in this ratio in 2013 from the previous period is primarily the result of lower net income, offset in part by a lower average equity.

Index

· Net Interest Margin

The net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was 3.28% and 3.34%, respectively. The ratio is calculated by dividing net interest income by average earning assets. Earning assets are primarily made up of loans and investments that earn interest. This ratio is used to measure how well the Company is able to maintain interest rates on earning assets above those of interest-bearing liabilities, which is the interest expense paid on deposits and other borrowings. Due to the recognition of $320,000 in interest income on several nonaccrual loans, that were collected or returned to accrual during the quarter, the net interest margin would have been 3.17% for the quarter ended September 30, 2013. The decrease in this ratio in 2013 is primarily the result of higher interest earning average assets with decreasing yields driven by a competitive market and offset in part by lower market cost of funds on interest bearing liabilities, assisted in part by the recognition of the nonaccrual interest income.

· Efficiency Ratio

This ratio is calculated by dividing noninterest expense by net interest income and noninterest income. The ratio is a measure of the Company’s ability to manage noninterest expenses. The Company’s efficiency ratio was 50.63% and 48.93% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The change in the efficiency ratio in 2013 from the previous period is primarily the result of increased noninterest expense.

· Capital Ratio

The average capital ratio is calculated by dividing average total equity capital by average total assets. It measures the level of average assets that are funded by shareholders’ equity. Given an equal level of risk in the financial condition of two companies, the higher the capital ratio, generally the more financially sound the company. The Company’s capital ratio of 11.47% as of September 30, 2013 is significantly higher than the industry average as of June 30, 2013.

Industry Results

The FDIC Quarterly Banking Profile reported the following results for the second quarter of 2013:

Earnings Rise for Sixteenth Consecutive Quarter

Rising noninterest income and falling loan loss expenses continued to lift bank earnings in the second quarter. FDIC-insured institutions reported net income of $42.2 billion, an increase of $7.8 billion (22.6%) compared with second quarter 2012 when industry earnings were reduced by losses on credit derivatives. This is the 16th consecutive quarter that earnings have registered a year-over-year increase. For a second consecutive quarter, industry earnings reached a new nominal high. However, the quarterly return on assets (ROA) of 1.17%, while up from 0.99% a year ago, remained below the 1.27% average for the industry from 2000 through 2006. More than half of all banks— 53.8%—reported higher quarterly net income than a year ago, and only 8.2% reported negative net income. This is the lowest proportion of unprofitable institutions since third quarter 2006.

Noninterest Income Growth Outweighs Drop in Net Interest Income

Net operating revenue—the sum of net interest income and total noninterest income—totaled $170.6 billion, an increase of $4.9 billion (3%) from a year ago. Noninterest income was $6.7 billion (11.1%) higher than in second quarter 2012. Income from trading rose by $5.1 billion (238.3%) compared with a year ago, when the industry reported a net loss on credit derivatives. Net gains on sales of loans and other assets were $1.9 billion (63.7%) above the level of a year earlier. For the third quarter in a row and fourth time in the last five quarters, net interest income posted a year-over-year decline, falling by $1.8 billion (1.7%) as interest income from loans and other investments declined faster than interest expense on deposits and other liabilities. Banks set aside $8.6 billion in provisions for loan losses during the quarter, a $5.6 billion (39.6%) reduction from a year earlier. This is the lowest quarterly loss provision for the industry since third quarter 2006, when quarterly provisions totaled $7.6 billion. Total noninterest expense was $1.4 billion (1.4%) lower than in second quarter 2012, when industry expenses were elevated by restructuring charges.

Index

Loan Losses Fall to Lowest Level Since 2007

Net loan and lease charge-offs totaled $14.2 billion, a $6.3 billion (30.7%) year-over-year decline. This is the smallest quarterly total since third quarter 2007. While charge-offs were down across all major loan categories, the overall decline was led by residential real estate loans. Charge-offs of home equity lines of credit were $1.1 billion (41.7%) below the level of a year ago, while charge-offs of other loans secured by 1-to-4 family residential properties were $1.4 billion (32.1%) lower. Smaller reductions occurred in charge-offs of real estate construction and land loans (down $772 million, or 67%), real estate loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential properties (down $775 million, or 52.5%), commercial and industrial loans (down $760 million, or 37.3%), and credit cards (down $748 million, or 11%).

Noncurrent Loans Post Thirteenth Consecutive Quarterly Decline

Noncurrent loan levels also showed improvement across all major loan categories. The amount of loans and leases that were 90 days or more past due or in nonaccrual status fell by $21.7 billion (8.3%) during the second quarter, marking the 13th consecutive quarter that noncurrent balances have declined. Noncurrent first lien mortgage loans declined by $13.3 billion (8.2%), while noncurrent real estate construction and land loans dropped by $2.8 billion (19.1%), and noncurrent real estate loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential properties fell by $2.5 billion (8.8%). During the quarter, the percentage of total loans and leases that were noncurrent declined from 3.41% to 3.09%, the lowest level since fourth quarter 2008.

Reserve Coverage of Troubled Loans Improves

For the 13th quarter in a row, the banking industry’s reserves for loan losses posted a quarterly decline. Between the end of March and the end of June, total reserves fell by $6.4 billion (4.1%), as net charge-offs removed $14.2 billion from reserves and loan-loss provisions added only $8.6 billion to reserves. As has been typically the case, most of the reduction in reserves occurred at large institutions, but quarterly charge-offs exceeded loss provisions at almost 40% of all banks in the quarter. Even with the reserve reductions, the industry’s coverage ratio of reserves to noncurrent loans rose from 59.6% to 62.3% during the quarter because of the sizable decline in noncurrent loan balances.

Lower Securities Values Lead to a Decline in Equity Capital

Equity capital of insured institutions declined by $14 billion (0.9%), largely due to declines in the market values of securities caused by rising medium-and long-term interest rates. Higher interest rates were primarily responsible for a $51.1 billion drop in unrealized gains on banks’ available-for-sale investment securities. Under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), changes in unrealized gains are reflected in equity capital. However, they are not reflected in regulatory capital. The industry’s Tier 1 leverage capital increased by $17.1 billion (1.3%) during the quarter, while total risk-based capital rose by $15 billion (1%). Retained earnings totaled $21.3 billion in the second quarter, up from $14.9 billion in second quarter 2012. At the end of the quarter, almost 98% of all insured institutions, representing 99.7% of total industry assets, met or exceeded the requirements for the highest regulatory capital category, as defined for Prompt Corrective Action purposes.

Index

Total Assets Fall by $14.8 Billion

For a second consecutive quarter, total industry assets posted a modest decline, falling by $14.8 billion (0.1%). Assets in trading accounts declined by $65.7 billion (9.1%), as balances of securities held for trading declined by $44.4 billion (14.6%). Trading securities are reported at market value, so it is likely that some of this decline was caused by the rise in medium- and long-term interest rates during the quarter. Balances of securities held in investment accounts declined by $53.2 billion (1.8%), due primarily to the $51.1 billion drop in unrealized gains noted above.

Loan Balances Rise by $73.8 Billion

Total loans and leases increased by $73.8 billion (1%), as commercial and industrial loan balances grew by $30.4 billion (2%), real estate loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential real estate properties rose by $11.1 billion (1%), auto loans increased by $10 billion (3.1%), and credit card balances grew by $10.1 billion (1.5%). Balances of 1-to-4 family residential real estate loans declined by $31.9 billion (1.3%), with home equity lines falling by $9.8 billion (1.8%), and other 1-to-4 family residential real estate loans declining by $22.1 billion (1.2%).

FHLB Borrowings Increase

Total liabilities of insured institutions registered a small $457 million decline in the second quarter. Deposit balances fell by $38.7 billion (0.4%), while Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances increased by $38.2 billion (11.6%). Most of the increase in FHLB borrowings—$34.6 billion— consisted of borrowings maturing in one year or less. Interest-bearing deposits in domestic offices declined by $44.4 billion (0.6%), while balances in noninterest-bearing accounts rose by $13.4 billion (0.5%). Foreign office deposits declined by $7.7 billion (0.6%).

The Number of “Problem” Banks Falls Below 600

The number of FDIC-insured institutions filing quarterly Call Reports declined to 6,940 at mid-year, from 7,019 at the end of the first quarter. During the second quarter, 62 insured institutions were merged into other institutions and 12 failed. For the eighth consecutive quarter, no new reporting institutions were added. The last de novo charter occurred in fourth quarter 2010. The number of institutions on the FDIC’s “Problem List” declined for a ninth consecutive quarter, from 612 to 553. Total assets of “problem” banks fell from $213.3 billion to $192.5 billion. Insured institutions reported 2,097,292 full-time equivalent employees in the second quarter, down 5,544 from the previous quarter, and 10,900 fewer than in second quarter 2012.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion contained in this Item 2 and other disclosures included within this report are based, in part, on the Company’s audited December 31, 2012 consolidated financial statements. These statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The financial information contained in these statements is, for the most part, based on the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. However, the preparation of these statements requires management to make certain estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” contained in the Company’s Annual Report. Based on its consideration of accounting policies that involve the most complex and subjective estimates and judgments, management has identified its most critical accounting policies to be those related to the allowance for loan losses, valuation of other real estate owned, the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment of certain securities available-for-sale and the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets.

Index

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses that is treated as an expense and charged against earnings. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that collectability of the principal is unlikely. The Company has policies and procedures for evaluating the overall credit quality of its loan portfolio, including timely identification of potential problem loans. On a quarterly basis, management reviews the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses, incorporating a variety of risk considerations, both quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative factors include the Company’s historical loss experience, delinquency and charge-off trends, collateral values, known information about individual loans and other factors. Qualitative factors include the general economic environment in the Company’s market area. To the extent actual results differ from forecasts and management’s judgment, the allowance for loan losses may be greater or lesser than future charge-offs. Due to potential changes in conditions, it is at least reasonably possible that change in estimates will occur in the near term and that such changes could be material to the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements.

Other Real Estate Owned

Real estate properties acquired through or in lieu of foreclosure are initially recorded at the fair value less estimated selling cost at the date of foreclosure. Any write-downs based on the asset’s fair value at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses. After foreclosure, independent appraisals or evaluations are periodically performed by management and property held for sale is carried at the lower of the new cost basis or fair value less cost to sell. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a property exceeds its fair value, and any subsequent write-downs are recorded as a charge to operations, if necessary, to reduce the carrying value of a property to the lower of its cost basis or fair value less cost to sell. Costs of significant property improvements are capitalized, whereas costs relating to holding property are expensed. The portion of interest costs relating to development of real estate is capitalized. The appraisals or evaluations are inherently subjective and require estimates that are susceptible to significant revisions as more information becomes available. Due to potential changes in conditions, it is at least reasonably possible that changes in fair values will occur in the near term and that such changes could materially affect the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Available-for-Sale Securities

Declines in the fair value of securities available-for-sale below their cost that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are generally reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers: (1) the intent to sell the investment securities and the more likely than not requirement that the Company will be required to sell the investment securities prior to recovery; (2) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; and (3) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. Due to potential changes in conditions, it is at least reasonably possible that change in management’s assessment of other-than-temporary impairment will occur in the near term and that such changes could be material to the amounts reported in the Company’s financial statements.

Index

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and the core deposit intangible asset arose in connection with the Acquisition. These assets are tested annually for impairment or more often if conditions indicate a possible impairment. For the purposes of goodwill impairment testing, determination of the fair value of a reporting unit involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Through September 30, 2013, no conditions indicated impairment has incurred. The next annual test will be performed in the fourth quarter of 2013. Actual future test results may differ from the present evaluation of impairment due to changes in the conditions used in the current evaluation.

Index

Income Statement Review for the Three Months ended September 30, 2013

The following highlights a comparative discussion of the major components of net income and their impact for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES

The following two tables are used to calculate the Company’s net interest margin. The first table includes the Company’s average assets and the related income to determine the average yield on earning assets. The second table includes the average liabilities and related expense to determine the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities. The net interest margin is equal to the interest income less the interest expense divided by average earning assets.

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND INTEREST RATES

	Three Months ended September 30,

	2013							2012

	Average		Revenue/		Yield/			Average		Revenue/		Yield/
	balance		expense		rate			balance		expense		rate
ASSETS
(dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets
Loans 1
Commercial	$	77,574	$	964		4.97	%	$	82,408	$	1,018		4.94	%
Agricultural		68,159		903		5.30	%		66,203		939		5.67	%
Real estate		368,220		4,503		4.89	%		329,331		4,216		5.12	%
Consumer and other		14,522		199		5.49	%		18,001		241		5.35	%

Total loans (including fees)		528,475		6,569		4.97	%		495,943		6,414		5.17	%

Investment securities
Taxable		293,262		1,400		1.91	%		292,557		1,442		1.97	%
Tax-exempt 2		297,021		2,608		3.51	%		261,927		2,611		3.99	%
Total investment securities		590,283		4,008		2.72	%		554,484		4,053		2.92	%

Interest bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold		31,061		86		1.11	%		46,109		113		0.98	%

Total interest-earning assets		1,149,819	$	10,663		3.71	%		1,096,536	$	10,580		3.86	%

Noninterest-earning assets		51,489							70,467

TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,201,308						$	1,167,003

1 Average loan balance includes nonaccrual loans, if any. Interest income collected on nonaccrual loans has been included.

2 Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using an incremental tax rate of 35%.

Index

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND INTEREST RATES

	Three Months ended September 30,

	2013								2012

	Average		Revenue/			Yield/			Average		Revenue/			Yield/
	balance		expense			rate			balance		expense			rate
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(dollars in thousands)
Interest-bearing liabilities
Deposits
NOW, savings accounts and money markets	$	564,759	$	274			0.19	%	$	531,091	$	289			0.22	%
Time deposits > $100,000		94,589		257			1.09	%		97,578		305			1.25	%
Time deposits < $100,000		148,073		393			1.06	%		160,291		503			1.26	%
Total deposits		807,421		924			0.46	%		788,960		1,097			0.56	%
Other borrowed funds		79,746		315			1.58	%		74,688		323			1.73	%

Total Interest-bearing liabilities		887,167		1,239			0.56	%		863,648		1,420			0.66	%

Noninterest-bearing liabilities
Demand deposits		170,501								153,267
Other liabilities		5,827								7,927

Stockholders' equity		137,813								142,161

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	1,201,308							$	1,167,003

Net interest income			$	9,424			3.28	%			$	9,160			3.34	%

Spread Analysis
Interest income/average assets	$	10,663		3.55	%				$	10,580		3.63	%
Interest expense/average assets	$	1,239		0.41	%				$	1,420		0.49	%
Net interest income/average assets	$	9,424		3.14	%				$	9,160		3.14	%

Net Interest Income

For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company's net interest margin adjusted for tax exempt income was 3.28% and 3.34%, respectively. Net interest income, prior to the adjustment for tax-exempt income, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $8,511,000 compared to $8,246,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, interest income increased $84,000, or 0.9%, when compared to the same period in 2012. The increase from 2012 was primarily attributable the recognition of $320,000 of nonaccrual interest income on several nonaccrual loans that were collected or returned to accrual during the quarter and higher average balances on loans and investment securities, offset in part by lower average yields on loans and investment securities. The higher average balances were due primarily to increased loan demand and the deployment of additional growth in average deposits into securities available-for-sale portfolio. The lower yields were due primarily to continued low market interest rates.

Index

Interest expense decreased $181,000, or 12.7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012. The lower interest expense for the period is primarily attributable to lower average rates paid on deposits, offset in part by a higher average balance on deposits. The lower yields were due primarily to continued low market interest rates.

Provision for Loan Losses

The Company’s provision for loan losses was $92,000 and $36,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net loan charge-offs were $8,000 and $48,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Noninterest Income and Expense

Noninterest income decreased $239,000 or 11.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease in non-interest income is primarily due to lower gains on the sale of loans held for sale due to decreased secondary market volume as refinancing activity has slowed. Excluding net security gains, non-interest income increased $223,000, or 12.1%.

Noninterest expense increased $188,000 or 3.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily as a result of increased salaries and employee benefits. Salaries and benefits increased primarily due to normal salary increases and increased staffing.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $1,296,000 and $1,366,000, representing an effective tax rate of 26% for both periods.

Index

Income Statement Review for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2013

The following highlights a comparative discussion of the major components of net income and their impact for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND INTEREST RATES

	Nine Months ended September 30,

	2013							2012

	Average		Revenue/		Yield/			Average		Revenue/		Yield/
	balance		expense		rate			balance		expense		rate
ASSETS
(dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets
Loans 1
Commercial	$	80,196	$	2,878		4.78	%	$	81,743	$	3,027		4.94	%
Agricultural		67,384		2,700		5.34	%		58,839		2,443		5.54	%
Real estate		356,864		12,693		4.74	%		317,924		12,250		5.14	%
Consumer and other		14,813		604		5.43	%		18,931		751		5.29	%

Total loans (including fees)		519,257		18,874		4.85	%		477,437		18,471		5.16	%

Investment securities
Taxable		297,868		4,179		1.87	%		282,649		4,660		2.20	%
Tax-exempt 2		294,706		7,952		3.60	%		248,177		7,762		4.17	%
Total investment securities		592,574		12,131		2.73	%		530,826		12,422		3.12	%

Interest bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold		48,449		304		0.84	%		53,581		371		0.92	%

Total interest-earning assets		1,160,280	$	31,310		3.60	%		1,061,844	$	31,264		3.93	%

Noninterest-earning assets		61,853							66,666

TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,222,133						$	1,128,510

1 Average loan balance includes nonaccrual loans, if any. Interest income collected on nonaccrual loans has been included.

2 Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using an incremental tax rate of 35%.

Index

AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND INTEREST RATES

	Nine Months ended September 30,

	2013								2012

	Average		Revenue/			Yield/			Average		Revenue/			Yield/
	balance		expense			rate			balance		expense			rate
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(dollars in thousands)
Interest-bearing liabilities
Deposits
NOW, savings accounts and money markets	$	587,072	$	870			0.20	%	$	509,511	$	858			0.22	%
Time deposits > $100,000		96,691		823			1.14	%		102,984		1,004			1.30	%
Time deposits < $100,000		150,975		1,227			1.08	%		151,189		1,558			1.37	%
Total deposits		834,738		2,920			0.47	%		763,684		3,420			0.60	%
Other borrowed funds		70,022		906			1.73	%		73,767		972			1.76	%

Total Interest-bearing liabilities		904,760		3,826			0.56	%		837,451		4,392			0.70	%

Noninterest-bearing liabilities
Demand deposits		167,774								143,837
Other liabilities		6,560								7,943

Stockholders' equity		143,039								139,279

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	1,222,133							$	1,128,510

Net interest income			$	27,484			3.16	%			$	26,872			3.37	%

Spread Analysis
Interest income/average assets	$	31,310		3.42	%				$	31,264		3.69	%
Interest expense/average assets	$	3,826		0.42	%				$	4,392		0.52	%
Net interest income/average assets	$	27,484		3.00	%				$	26,872		3.17	%

Net Interest Income

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company's net interest margin adjusted for tax exempt income was 3.16% and 3.37%, respectively. Net interest income, prior to the adjustment for tax-exempt income, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $24,703,000 compared to $24,157,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, interest income decreased $20,000, or 0.1%, when compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease from 2012 was primarily attributable to lower average yields on loans and investment securities, offset in part by higher average balance of investment securities and loans and the recognition of interest income on several nonaccrual loans that were collected or returned to accrual in 2013. The lower yields were due primarily to continued low market interest rates. The higher average balance of loans was due primarily to loan demand and the Acquisition. The higher average balance of investments was due primarily to the deployment of additional growth in average deposits into securities available-for-sale portfolio and the cash invested as a result of the Acquisition.

Index

Interest expense decreased $566,000, or 12.9%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012. The lower interest expense for the period is primarily attributable to lower average rates paid on deposits, offset in part by a higher average balance on deposits. The lower rates were due primarily to continued low market interest rates. The higher average balances of deposits were due primarily to the Acquisition.

Provision for Loan Losses

The Company’s provision for loan losses was $166,000 and $151,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net loan charge-offs were $36,000 and $47,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Noninterest Income and Expense

Noninterest income increased $62,000 or 1.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012. The increase in non-interest income is primarily due to higher securities gains and merchant and card fees, offset in part by a decrease in the gains on the loans held for sale. The increase in merchant and card fees was due primarily to the Acquisition. The decrease in the gain on the sale of loans was due primarily to a decrease in secondary market volume as refinancing activity has slowed. Excluding net security gains, non-interest income decreased $38,000, or 0.7%.

Noninterest expense increased $812,000 or 5.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 primarily as a result of higher salaries and employee benefits and higher other real estate owned costs. The higher salaries and benefits costs were due primarily to normal salary increases, the Acquisition and increased staffing. Other real estate owned costs increased due to the impairment write downs of $670,000 compared to $304,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was $3,524,000 and $3,605,000, representing an effective tax rate of 25% for both periods.

Balance Sheet Review

As of September 30, 2013, total assets were $1,213,233,000, a $4,459,000 decrease compared to December 31, 2012. The decrease assets were primarily due to a decrease in cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits in financial institutions and securities available-for-sale, offset in part by an increase in loans.

Investment Portfolio

The investment portfolio totaled $583,477,000 as of September 30, 2013, a decrease of $4,940,000 or 0.8% from the December 31, 2012 balance of $588,417,000. The decrease in the investment portfolio was primarily due to decreases in U.S. government mortgage-backed securities and a lower unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale, offset in part by increases in corporate bonds, state and political subdivisions bonds and corporate bonds and U.S. government agencies.

On a quarterly basis, the investment portfolio is reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment. As of September 30, 2013, gross unrealized losses of $8,168,000, are considered to be temporary in nature due to the increasing interest rate environment of 2013 and other general economic factors. As a result of the Company’s favorable liquidity position, the Company does not have the intent to sell securities with an unrealized loss at the present time. In addition, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will hold these securities until recovery of their fair value to cost basis and avoid considering present unrealized loss positions to be other-than-temporary.

Index

Loan Portfolio

The loan portfolio, net of the allowance for loan losses of $7,903,000, totaled $528,706,000 as of September 30, 2013, an increase of $18,581,000, or 3.6%, from the December 31, 2012 balance of $510,126,000. The increase in the loan portfolio is primarily due to loan demand in the commercial real estate portfolio and to a lessor extent the 1-4 family real estate portfolio.

Deposits

Deposits totaled $977,006,000 as of September 30, 2013, a decrease of $27,727,000, or 2.8%, from the December 31, 2012 balance of $1,004,732,000. The decrease in deposits occurred primarily in demand deposit and certificate of deposit accounts. These decreases occurred primarily in the public funds and retail types of deposit accounts.

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaled $31,974,000 as of September 30, 2013, an increase of $4,885,000, or 18.0%, from the December 31, 2012 balance of $27,089,000. The increase is primarily due to increases in existing customer account balances from December 31, 2012.

FHLB Advances and Other Long-Term Borrowings

FHLB advances and other long-term borrowings totaled $57,558,000 and $34,611,000 as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the increase in FHLB advances and other long-term borrowings are due to overnight borrowing from the FHLB of $23,000,000 and proceeds on FHLB fixed-term borrowings amounting to $2,000,000, offset in part by payments on FHLB advances amounting to $2,053,000.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. No material changes in the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements have occurred since December 31, 2012.

Asset Quality Review and Credit Risk Management

The Company’s credit risk is historically centered in the loan portfolio, which on September 30, 2013 totaled $528,706,000 compared to $510,126,000 as of December 31, 2012. Net loans comprise 43.6% of total assets as of September 30, 2013. The object in managing loan portfolio risk is to reduce the risk of loss resulting from a customer’s failure to perform according to the terms of a transaction and to quantify and manage credit risk on a portfolio basis. The Company’s level of problem loans (consisting of nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more) as a percentage of total loans was 0.52% at September 30, 2013, as compared to 1.27% at December 31, 2012 and 1.22% at September 30, 2012. The Company’s level of problem loans as a percentage of total loans at September 30, 2013 of 0.52% is lower than the Company’s peer group (343 bank holding companies with assets of $1 billion to $3 billion) of 1.86% as of June 30, 2013.

Index

Impaired loans, net of specific reserves, totaled $2,420,000 as of September 30, 2013 and were lower than impaired loans of $5,912,000 as of December 31, 2012 and $4,918,000 as of September 30, 2012. The decrease in impaired loans from December 31, 2012 is due primarily to payments received and credit improvements on impaired loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payment of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. The Company applies its normal loan review procedures to identify loans that should be evaluated for impairment.

The Company had TDRs of $1,635,000 as of September 30, 2013, of which all were included in impaired loans and $1,445,000 were on nonaccrual status. The Company had TDRs of $5,105,000 as of December 31, 2012, all of which were included in impaired loans and $4,058,000 were on nonaccrual status.

TDRs are monitored and reported on a quarterly basis. Certain TDRs are on nonaccrual status at the time of restructuring. These borrowings are typically returned to accrual status after the following: sustained repayment performance in accordance with the restructuring agreement for a reasonable period of at least six months; and, management is reasonably assured of future performance. If the TDR meets these performance criteria and the interest rate granted at the modification is equal to or greater than the rate that the Company was willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk, then the loan will return to performing status.

For TDRs that were on nonaccrual status before the modification, a specific reserve may already be recorded. In periods subsequent to modification, the Company will continue to evaluate all TDRs for possible impairment and, as necessary, recognizes impairment through the allowance. The Company had no charge-offs related to TDRs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Loans past due 90 days or more that are still accruing interest are reviewed no less frequently than quarterly to determine if there is a strong reason that the credit should not be placed on non-accrual. As of September 30, 2013, non-accrual loans totaled $2,722,000; loans past due 90 days and still accruing totaled $84,000. This compares to non-accrual loans of $5,567,000 and no loans past due 90 days and still accruing as of December 31, 2012. Other real estate owned totaled $8,994,000 as of September 30, 2013 and $9,911,000 as of December 31, 2012.

The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of outstanding loans as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was 1.47% and 1.50%, respectively. The allowance for loan losses totaled $7,903,000 and $7,773,000 as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Net charge-offs of loans totaled $36,000 and 47,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The allowance for loan losses is management’s best estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. Factors considered in establishing an appropriate allowance include: an assessment of the financial condition of the borrower, a realistic determination of value and adequacy of underlying collateral, the condition of the local economy and the condition of the specific industry of the borrower, an analysis of the levels and trends of loan categories and a review of delinquent and classified loans.

Index

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity management is the process by which the Company, through its Banks’ Asset and Liability Committees (ALCO), ensures that adequate liquid funds are available to meet its financial commitments on a timely basis, at a reasonable cost and within acceptable risk tolerances. These commitments include funding credit obligations to borrowers, funding of mortgage originations pending delivery to the secondary market, withdrawals by depositors, maintaining adequate collateral for pledging for public funds, trust deposits and borrowings, paying dividends to shareholders, payment of operating expenses, funding capital expenditures and maintaining deposit reserve requirements.

Liquidity is derived primarily from core deposit growth and retention; principal and interest payments on loans; principal and interest payments, sale, maturity and prepayment of securities available-for-sale; net cash provided from operations; and access to other funding sources. Other funding sources include federal funds purchased lines, FHLB advances and other capital market sources.

As of September 30, 2013, the level of liquidity and capital resources of the Company remain at a satisfactory level. Management believes that the Company's liquidity sources will be sufficient to support its existing operations for the foreseeable future.

The liquidity and capital resources discussion will cover the following topics:

·	Review of the Company’s Current Liquidity Sources

·	Review of Statements of Cash Flows

·	Company Only Cash Flows

·	Review of Commitments for Capital Expenditures, Cash Flow Uncertainties and Known Trends in Liquidity and Cash Flows Needs

·	Capital Resources

Review of the Company’s Current Liquidity Sources

Liquid assets of cash and due from banks and interest-bearing deposits in financial institutions as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 totaled $59,914,000 and $79,444,000, respectively, and provide a level of liquidity.

Other sources of liquidity available to the Banks as of September 30, 2013 include outstanding lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines, Iowa of $116,854,000, with $37,558,000 of outstanding FHLB advances at September 30, 2013. Federal funds borrowing capacity at correspondent banks was $108,233,000, with no outstanding federal fund balances as of September 30, 2013. The Company had securities sold under agreements to repurchase totaling $31,974,000 and long-term repurchase agreements of $20,000,000 as of September 30, 2013.

Total investments as of September 30, 2013 were $583,477,000 compared to $588,417,000 as of December 31, 2012. These investments provide the Company with a significant amount of liquidity since all of the investments are classified as available-for-sale as of September 30, 2013.

The investment portfolio serves an important role in the overall context of balance sheet management in terms of balancing capital utilization and liquidity. The decision to purchase or sell securities is based upon the current assessment of economic and financial conditions, including the interest rate environment, liquidity and credit considerations. The portfolio’s scheduled maturities represent a significant source of liquidity.

Index

Review of Statements of Cash Flows

Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $17,993,000 compared to the $10,227,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase of $7,766,000 in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to a decrease in other assets related to the repayment by the FDIC of the Bank’s unused prepaid insurance assessment and a decrease in a receivable due to investment securities sales transactions recorded at trade date, September 30, 2012, for which final settlement was received in October, 2012.

Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $23,029,000 and compares to $27,145,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease of $4,117,000 in net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to changes in securities available-for-sale, and interest bearing deposits in financial institutions, offset in part by the cash acquired, net of cash paid, for acquired bank offices and changes in net loan activity.

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $(4,111,000) compared to $17,631,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The change of $21,743,000 in net cash (used in) financing activities was primarily due to changes in deposits, offset in part by changes in FHLB borrowings and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. As of June 30, 2013, the Company did not have any external debt financing, off-balance sheet financing arrangements, or derivative instruments linked to its stock.

Company Only Cash Flows

The Company’s liquidity on an unconsolidated basis is heavily dependent upon dividends paid to the Company by the Banks. The Company requires adequate liquidity to pay its expenses and pay stockholder dividends. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, dividends paid by the Banks to the Company amounted to $5,400,000 compared to $6,796,000 for the same period in 2012. Various federal and state statutory provisions limit the amounts of dividends banking subsidiaries are permitted to pay to their holding companies without regulatory approval. Federal Reserve policy further limits the circumstances under which bank holding companies may declare dividends. For example, a bank holding company should not continue its existing rate of cash dividends on its common stock unless its net income is sufficient to fully fund each dividend and its prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with its capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. In addition, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC have issued policy statements, which provide that insured banks and bank holding companies should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. Federal and state banking regulators may also restrict the payment of dividends by order. The quarterly dividend declared by the Company increased to $0.16 per share in 2013 from $0.15 per share in 2012.

The Company, on an unconsolidated basis, has interest bearing deposits and marketable investment securities totaling $7,946,000 as of September 30, 2013 that are presently available to provide additional liquidity to the Banks.

Review of Commitments for Capital Expenditures, Cash Flow Uncertainties and Known Trends in Liquidity and Cash Flows Needs

No material capital expenditures or material changes in the capital resource mix are anticipated at this time. The primary cash flow uncertainty would be a sudden decline in deposits causing the Banks to liquidate securities. Historically, the Banks have maintained an adequate level of short-term marketable investments to fund the temporary declines in deposit balances. There are no known trends in liquidity and cash flow needs as of September 30, 2013 that are of concern to management.

Index

Capital Resources

The Company’s total stockholders’ equity as of September 30, 2013 totaled $141,354,000 and was lower than the $144,736,000 recorded as of December 31, 2012. The decrease in stockholders’ equity was primarily created by 2013 market interest rates trending higher, which resulted in lower fair values in the securities available-for-sale portfolio as reflected in other comprehensive (loss), offset in part by net income as reflected in the change in retained earnings. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, stockholders’ equity as a percentage of total assets was 11.65% and 11.89%, respectively. The capital levels of the Company exceed applicable regulatory guidelines as of September 30, 2013.

In early July 2013, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC issued interim final rules implementing the Basel III regulatory capital framework and related Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act changes. The rules revise minimum capital requirements and adjust prompt corrective action thresholds. The interim final rule revises the regulatory capital elements, adds a new common equity Tier I capital ratio, and increases the minimum Tier I capital ratio requirement. The revisions also permit banking organizations to retain, through a one-time election, the existing treatment for accumulated other comprehensive income and implement a new capital conservation buffer. The final rule will become effective January 1, 2015, subject to a transition period. Management is in the process of assessing the effect the Basel III Rules may have on the Company's and the Bank's capital positions and will monitor developments in this area.

Forward-Looking Statements and Business Risks

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides the Company with the opportunity to make cautionary statements regarding forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report, including forward-looking statements concerning the Company’s future financial performance and asset quality. Any forward-looking statement contained in this Quarterly Report is based on management’s current beliefs, assumptions and expectations of the Company’s future performance, taking into account all information currently available to management. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to management. If a change occurs, the Company’s business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, asset quality, plans and objectives may vary materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that may affect the actual results of the Company include, but are not limited to, the following: economic conditions, particularly in the concentrated geographic area in which the Company and its affiliate banks operate; competitive products and pricing available in the marketplace; changes in credit and other risks posed by the Company’s loan and investment portfolios, including declines in commercial or residential real estate values or changes in the allowance for loan losses dictated by new market conditions or regulatory requirements; fiscal and monetary policies of the U.S. government; changes in governmental regulations affecting financial institutions (including regulatory fees and capital requirements); changes in prevailing interest rates; credit risk management and asset/liability management; the financial and securities markets; the availability of and cost associated with sources of liquidity; and other risks and uncertainties inherent in the Company’s business, including those discussed under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements and Business Risks” in the Company’s Annual Report. Management intends to identify forward-looking statements when using words such as “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “should” or similar expressions. Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update such forward-looking statements to reflect current events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Index

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company's market risk is comprised primarily of interest rate risk arising from its core banking activities of lending and deposit taking. Interest rate risk results from the changes in market interest rates which may adversely affect the Company's net interest income. Management continually develops and applies strategies to mitigate this risk. Management does not believe that the Company's primary market risk exposure and how it has been managed year-to-date in 2013 changed significantly when compared to 2012.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Not applicable

Item 1.A.

Risk Factors

None.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

In November, 2012, the Company approved a Stock Repurchase Plan which provided for the repurchase of up to 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of September 30, 2013, there were 100,000 shares remaining to be purchased under the plan.

Index

The following table provides information with respect to purchase made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated purchases” (as defined in rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), of the Company’s common stock during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Total

Number

Maximum

of Shares

Number of

Purchased as

Shares that

Total

Part of

May Yet Be

Number

Average

Publicly

Purchased

of Shares

Price Paid

Announced

Under

Period

Purchased

Per Share

Plans

The Plan

July 1, 2013 to July 31, 2013

100,000

August 1, 2013 to August 31, 2013

100,000

September 1, 2013 to September 30, 2013

100,000

Total

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5.

Other information

Not applicable

Item 6.

Exhibits

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document (1)
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1)
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (1)
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (1)
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1)
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (1)

(1) These interactive date files shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act o f1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act o f1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

Index

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	AMES NATIONAL CORPORATION

DATE: November 8, 2013	By:	/s/ Thomas H. Pohlman

	Thomas H. Pohlman, Chief Executive Officer and President

	By:	/s/ John P. Nelson

	John P. Nelson, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President

Index

EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibits are filed herewith:

Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document (1)
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1)
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (1)
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (1)
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1)
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (1)

(1)These interactive date files shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act o f1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

Ames National Corp. - 10-Q quarterly report FY

What is the market capitalization of a company?

DISCLAIMER

Contact

Links