Companies:
10,652
total market cap:
$140.552 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Alexandria Real Estate Equities
ARE
#2140
Rank
$9.42 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$54.41
Share price
3.66%
Change (1 day)
-41.34%
Change (1 year)
๐ Real estate
Categories
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. is a real estate investment trust that invests in office buildings and laboratories.
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Alexandria Real Estate Equities
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2015 Q2
Alexandria Real Estate Equities - 10-Q quarterly report FY2015 Q2
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2015
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission file number 1-12993
ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
95-4502084
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
385 East Colorado Boulevard, Suite 299, Pasadena, California 91101
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(626) 578-0777
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
ý
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
ý
As of
July 15, 2015
,
72,307,596
shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014
4
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
5
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015 and 2014
6
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Noncontrolling Interests for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
10
Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
46
Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
101
Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
102
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A.
RISK FACTORS
103
Item 6.
EXHIBITS
104
SIGNATURES
106
GLOSSARY
The following abbreviations or acronyms that may be used in this document shall have the adjacent meanings set forth below:
ABR
Annualized Base Rent
AFFO
Adjusted Funds from Operations
bps
Basis Points
CIP
Construction in Progress
EBITDA
Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization
EPS
Earnings per Share
FASB
Financial Accounting Standards Board
FFO
Funds from Operations
GAAP
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
HVAC
Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning
LEED
®
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
LIBOR
London Interbank Offered Rate
NAREIT
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
NAV
Net Asset Value
NBV
Net Book Value
NOI
Net Operating Income
NYSE
New York Stock Exchange
REIT
Real Estate Investment Trust
RSF
Rentable Square Feet/Foot
SEC
Securities and Exchange Commission
SoMa
South of Market (submarket of the San Francisco market)
U.S.
United States
VIE
Variable Interest Entity
3
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Assets
Investments in real estate
$
7,442,875
$
7,226,016
Cash and cash equivalents
68,617
86,011
Restricted cash
44,191
26,884
Tenant receivables
9,279
10,548
Deferred rent
257,427
234,124
Deferred leasing and financing costs
210,709
201,798
Investments
360,614
236,389
Other assets
131,179
114,266
Total assets
$
8,524,891
$
8,136,036
Liabilities, Noncontrolling Interests, and Equity
Secured notes payable
$
771,435
$
652,209
Unsecured senior notes payable
1,747,531
1,747,370
Unsecured senior line of credit
624,000
304,000
Unsecured senior bank term loans
950,000
975,000
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits
531,612
489,085
Dividends payable
61,194
58,814
Total liabilities
4,685,772
4,226,478
Commitments and contingencies
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
14,248
14,315
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity:
Series D cumulative convertible preferred stock
237,163
237,163
Series E cumulative redeemable preferred stock
130,000
130,000
Common stock
717
715
Additional paid-in capital
3,371,016
3,461,189
Accumulated other comprehe
nsive income (loss)
83,980
(628
)
Alexandria’s stockholders’ equity
3,822,876
3,828,439
Noncontrolling interests
1,995
66,804
Total equity
3,824,871
3,895,243
Total liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and equity
$
8,524,891
$
8,136,036
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Revenues:
Rental
$
151,805
$
134,992
$
295,413
$
265,562
Tenant recoveries
49,594
40,944
97,988
82,626
Other income
2,757
466
7,508
4,400
Total revenues
204,156
176,402
400,909
352,588
Expenses:
Rental operations
62,250
52,353
123,473
104,860
General and administrative
14,989
13,836
29,376
27,060
Interest
26,668
17,433
49,904
36,556
Depreciation and amortization
62,171
57,314
121,091
107,735
Impairment of real estate
—
—
14,510
—
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
189
—
189
—
Total expenses
166,267
140,936
338,543
276,211
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
541
—
1,115
—
Income from continuing operations
38,430
35,466
63,481
76,377
Loss from discontinued operations
—
(147
)
(43
)
(309
)
Gain on sales of real estate – land parcels
—
797
—
797
Net income
38,430
36,116
63,438
76,865
Dividends on preferred stock
(6,246
)
(6,472
)
(12,493
)
(12,943
)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(263
)
(1,307
)
(755
)
(2,502
)
Net income attributable to unvested restricted stock awards
(630
)
(405
)
(1,113
)
(779
)
Net income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders
$
31,291
$
27,932
$
49,077
$
60,641
EPS attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – basic and diluted:
Continuing operations
$
0.44
$
0.39
$
0.69
$
0.85
Discontinued operations
—
—
—
—
EPS – basic and diluted
$
0.44
$
0.39
$
0.69
$
0.85
Dividends declared per share of common stock
$
0.77
$
0.72
$
1.51
$
1.42
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Net income
$
38,430
$
36,116
$
63,438
$
76,865
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period
55,401
(2,734
)
83,836
16,045
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
1,362
406
2,465
406
Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities, net
56,763
(2,328
)
86,301
16,451
Unrealized (losses) gains on interest rate swap agreements:
Unrealized interest rate swap losses arising during the period
(1,225
)
(2,526
)
(4,238
)
(3,914
)
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of losses to interest expense included in net income
710
1,123
1,215
4,613
Unrealized (losses) gains on interest rate swap agreements, net
(515
)
(1,403
)
(3,023
)
699
Unrealized (losses) gains on foreign currency translation:
Unrealized foreign currency translation (losses) gains arising during the period
(1,507
)
5,915
(7,778
)
2,809
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
—
—
9,236
—
Unrealized (losses) gains on foreign currency translation, net
(1,507
)
5,915
1,458
2,809
Total other comprehensive income
54,741
2,184
84,736
19,959
Comprehensive income
93,171
38,300
148,174
96,824
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(237
)
(1,307
)
(883
)
(2,502
)
Comprehensive income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders
$
92,934
$
36,993
$
147,291
$
94,322
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Noncontrolling Interests
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.’s Stockholders’ Equity
Series D
Cumulative
Convertible
Preferred
Stock
Series E
Cumulative
Redeemable
Preferred
Stock
Number of
Common
Shares
Common
Stock
Additional
Paid-In Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Equity
Redeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests
Balance as of December 31, 2014
$
237,163
$
130,000
71,463,876
$
715
$
3,461,189
$
—
$
(628
)
$
66,804
$
3,895,243
$
14,315
Net income
—
—
—
—
—
62,683
—
227
62,910
528
Total other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
—
—
84,608
128
84,736
—
Contributions by noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
340
340
—
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(595
)
Issuances of common stock
—
—
56,874
1
5,051
—
—
—
5,052
—
Issuances pursuant to stock plan
—
—
168,054
1
12,032
—
—
—
12,033
—
Purchase of noncontrolling interest
—
—
—
—
(48,463
)
—
—
(65,504
)
(113,967
)
—
Dividends declared on common stock
—
—
—
—
—
(108,983
)
—
—
(108,983
)
—
Dividends declared on preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(12,493
)
—
—
(12,493
)
—
Distributions in excess of earnings
—
—
—
—
(58,793
)
58,793
—
—
—
—
Balance as of June 30, 2015
$
237,163
$
130,000
71,688,804
$
717
$
3,371,016
$
—
$
83,980
$
1,995
$
3,824,871
$
14,248
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Operating Activities
Net income
$
63,438
$
76,865
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
121,091
107,735
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
189
—
Gain on sales of real estate – land parcels
—
(797
)
Impairment of real estate
14,510
—
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
(1,115
)
—
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
648
—
Amortization of loan fees
5,723
5,304
Amortization of debt (premiums) discounts
(182
)
136
Amortization of acquired below-market leases
(1,939
)
(1,434
)
Deferred rent
(23,193
)
(24,619
)
Stock compensation expense
7,744
6,304
Investment gains
(13,710
)
(6,225
)
Investment losses
7,877
5,240
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash
110
—
Tenant receivables
1,243
(735
)
Deferred leasing costs
(24,503
)
(17,452
)
Other assets
(4,921
)
(5,916
)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits
(1,610
)
85
Net cash provided by operating activities
151,400
144,491
Investing Activities
Proceeds from sales of real estate
92,455
17,868
Additions to real estate
(226,302
)
(210,792
)
Purchase of real estate
(137,493
)
(97,785
)
Deposits for investing activities
(15,501
)
—
Change in restricted cash related to construction projects
—
5,650
Investment in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures
(3,182
)
(1,405
)
Additions to investments
(52,738
)
(25,358
)
Sales of investments
22,474
8,794
Repayment of notes receivable
4,247
29,851
Net cash used in investing activities
$
(316,040
)
$
(273,177
)
8
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Financing Activities
Borrowings from secured notes payable
$
42,867
$
77,762
Repayments of borrowings from secured notes payable
(10,075
)
(219,427
)
Borrowings from unsecured senior line of credit
915,000
637,000
Repayments of borrowings from unsecured senior line of credit
(595,000
)
(270,000
)
Repayments of borrowings from unsecured senior bank term loans
(25,000
)
—
Change in restricted cash related to financing activities
(1,520
)
1,212
Payment of loan fees
(3,559
)
(310
)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
5,052
—
Dividends on common stock
(106,603
)
(98,867
)
Dividends on preferred stock
(12,493
)
(12,943
)
Contributions by noncontrolling interests
340
19,410
Distributions to and purchases of noncontrolling interests
(61,890
)
(1,983
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
147,119
131,854
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
127
837
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(17,394
)
4,005
Cash and cash equivalents as of the beginning of period
86,011
57,696
Cash and cash equivalents as of the end of period
$
68,617
$
61,701
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for interest, net of interest capitalized
$
44,332
$
31,922
Non-Cash Investing Activities
Change in accrued construction
$
(27,469
)
$
592
Assumption of secured notes payable in connection with purchase of real estate
$
(82,000
)
$
(48,329
)
Non-Cash Financing Activities
Payable for purchase of noncontrolling interest
$
(52,672
)
$
—
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
9
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1.
Background
As used in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, references to the “Company,” “Alexandria,” “ARE,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc., and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (NYSE:ARE) is a self-administered, and self-managed office REIT uniquely focused on collaborative science and technology campuses in urban innovation clusters with a total market capitalization of
$10.7 billion
as of
June 30, 2015
, and an asset base of
31.1 million
square feet, including
18.8 million
RSF of operating and current value-creation projects, as well as an additional
12.3 million
square feet of near-term and future ground-up value-creation development projects. Alexandria pioneered this niche in 1994 and has since established a dominant market presence in AAA locations, including Greater Boston, San Francisco, New York City, San Diego, Seattle, Maryland, and Research Triangle Park. Alexandria is known for its high-quality and diverse client tenant base. Alexandria has a longstanding and proven track record of developing Class A assets clustered in urban science and technology campuses that provide its innovative client tenants with highly dynamic and collaborative environments that enhance their ability to successfully recruit and retain world-class talent and inspire productivity, efficiency, creativity, and success. We believe these advantages result in higher occupancy levels, longer lease terms, higher rental income, higher returns, and greater long-term asset value. For additional information on Alexandria, please visit our website at www.are.com.
Our asset base consisted of the following, as of
June 30, 2015
:
Square Feet
Operating properties
16,822,194
Current value-creation projects (includes unconsolidated joint ventures)
1,995,729
Total operating and current value-creation projects
18,817,923
Near-term value-creation projects (CIP)
2,026,669
Future value-creation projects:
North America
3,807,375
Asia
6,419,707
10,227,082
Near-term and future value-creation projects
12,253,751
Total
31,071,674
As of
June 30, 2015
:
•
Investment-grade client tenants represented approximately
53%
of our total annualized base rent;
•
Approximately
94%
of our leases (on an RSF basis) contained effective annual rent escalations that were either fixed (generally ranging from
3%
to
3.5%
) or indexed based on a consumer price index or other indices;
•
Approximately
96%
of our leases (on an RSF basis) were triple net leases, requiring client tenants to pay substantially all real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, common area, and other operating expenses (including increases thereto) in addition to base rent; and
•
Approximately
94%
of our leases (on an RSF basis) provided for the recapture of certain capital expenditures (such as HVAC systems maintenance and/or replacement, roof replacement, and parking lot resurfacing) that we believe would typically be borne by the landlord in traditional office leases.
Any references to the number of buildings, square footage, number of leases, occupancy, and any amounts derived from these values in the notes to the consolidated financial statements are unaudited and outside the scope of our independent registered public accounting firm’s review of our interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
10
2.
Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
2.
Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies
We have prepared the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the SEC. In our opinion, the interim consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments that are necessary to fairly present the interim consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2015. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Basis of presentation and consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
In certain circumstances, we may enter into joint venture arrangements with outside partners. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate each joint venture arrangement under the VIE model, and if the entity is determined not to be a VIE, we then evaluate the entity under the voting model to determine if the entity should be consolidated.
Under the VIE model, an entity is determined to be a VIE if it has any of the following characteristics:
•
The entity does not have sufficient equity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support;
•
The equity holders, as a group, lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest; or
•
The legal entity is established with non-substantive voting rights.
If an entity is determined to be a VIE, we evaluate whether we are the primary beneficiary using qualitative analyses. Factors considered include, but are not limited to, the purpose and design of the VIE, risks that the VIE was designed to create and pass through, the form of our ownership interest, our representation on the entity’s governing body, the size and seniority of our investment, our ability to participate in policy-making decisions, and the rights of the other investors to participate in the decision-making process and/or liquidate the venture, if applicable. We consolidate VIEs whenever we determine that we are the primary beneficiary.
If an entity is determined not to be a VIE, we then evaluate such entity under the voting model. Under the voting model, if we are the general partner or managing member, or have a similar role that can direct the operations of the entity, we have a presumption that we control the entity and we should consolidate regardless of our ownership percentage. If we determine that the other equity holders have any one of the following rights, it is assumed that we do not control the entity and therefore should not consolidate the entity: (i) the substantive ability to dissolve the entity or remove us from the lead role of the entity or (ii) substantive rights that allow them to participate in the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance.
As of
June 30, 2015
, we had
two
joint ventures that did not meet the requirements for consolidation and were accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Refer to Note 3 – “Investments in Real Estate,” appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, for further information on our unconsolidated joint ventures.
Use of estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and equity; the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements; and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
11
2.
Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Investments in real estate and properties classified as “held-for-sale”
We recognize real estate acquired (including the intangible value of above- or below-market leases, acquired in-place leases, client tenant relationships, and other intangible assets or liabilities), liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in an acquired entity at their fair value as of the acquisition date. If there is a bargain fixed-rate renewal option for the period beyond the non-cancelable lease term of an in-place lease, we evaluate factors such as the business conditions in the industry in which the lessee operates, the economic conditions in the area in which the property is located, and the ability of the lessee to sublease the property during the renewal term, in order to determine the likelihood that the lessee will renew. When we determine there is reasonable assurance that such bargain purchase option will be exercised, we consider its impact in determining the intangible value of such lease and its related amortization period. The value of tangible assets acquired is based upon our estimation of value on an as-if-vacant basis. The value of acquired in-place leases includes the estimated costs during the hypothetical lease-up period and other costs that would have been incurred in the execution of similar leases, considering market conditions at the acquisition date of the acquired in-place lease. We assess the fair value of tangible and intangible assets based on numerous factors, including estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors, including the historical operating results, known trends, and market/economic conditions that may affect the property. We also recognize the fair values of assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in acquisitions of less than a 100% interest when the acquisition constitutes a change in control of the acquired entity. Acquisition-related costs related to the acquisition of businesses, including real estate acquired with in-place leases, are expensed as incurred.
The values allocated to buildings and building improvements, land improvements, tenant improvements, and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis using the shorter of the term of the respective ground lease and up to
40 years
for buildings and building improvements, an estimated life of
20 years
for land improvements, the respective lease term for tenant improvements, and the estimated useful life for equipment. The values of acquired above- and below-market leases are amortized over the terms of the related leases and recognized as either an increase (for below-market leases) or a decrease (for above-market leases) to rental income. The values of acquired in-place leases are classified in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and amortized over the remaining terms of the related leases.
We are required to capitalize project costs, including predevelopment costs, interest, property taxes, insurance, and other costs directly related and essential to the acquisition, development, redevelopment, predevelopment, or construction of a project. Capitalization of development, redevelopment, predevelopment, and construction costs is required while activities are ongoing to prepare an asset for its intended use. Fluctuations in our development, redevelopment, predevelopment, and construction activities could result in significant changes to total expenses and net income. Costs incurred after a project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use are expensed as incurred. Should development, redevelopment, predevelopment, or construction activity cease, interest, property taxes, insurance, and certain other costs would no longer be eligible for capitalization and would be expensed as incurred. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
A property is classified as “held-for-sale” when all of the following criteria for a plan of sale have been met: (i) management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the property; (ii) the property is available for immediate sale in its present condition, subject only to terms that are usual and customary; (iii) an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell have been initiated; (iv) the sale of the property is probable and is expected to be completed within
one year
; (v) the property is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and (vi) actions necessary to complete the plan of sale indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. Depreciation of assets ceases upon designation of a property as “held-for-sale.” Prior to our adoption of the new discontinued operations accounting standard on October 1, 2014, the operations of properties “held-for-sale” were classified as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of income.
Subsequent to the adoption of the new discontinued operations accounting standard on October 1, 2014, if the disposal of the property represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on our operations or financial results, such as (i) a major line of business, (ii) a major geographic area, (iii) a major equity method investment, or (iv) other major parts of an entity, then the operations of the property “held-for-sale,” including any interest expense directly attributable to it, are classified as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of income, and amounts for all prior periods presented are reclassified from continuing operations to discontinued operations. The disposal of an individual property generally will not represent a strategic shift and therefore will typically not meet the criteria for classification as discontinued operations.
12
2.
Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets to be held and used, including our rental properties, CIP, land held for development, and intangibles, are individually evaluated for impairment when conditions exist that may indicate that the amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. The amount of a long-lived asset to be held and used is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. Impairment indicators or triggering events for long-lived assets to be held and used, including our rental properties, CIP, land held for development, and intangibles, are assessed by project and include significant fluctuations in estimated rental revenues less rental operating expenses, occupancy changes, significant near-term lease expirations, current and historical operating and/or cash flow losses, construction costs, estimated completion dates, rental rates, and other market factors. We assess the expected undiscounted cash flows based upon numerous factors, including, but not limited to, construction costs, available market information, current and historical operating results, known trends, current market/economic conditions that may affect the property, and our assumptions about the use of the asset, including, if necessary, a probability-weighted approach if multiple outcomes are under consideration. Upon determination that an impairment has occurred, a write-down is recognized to reduce the carrying amount to its estimated fair value. If an impairment loss is not required to be recognized, the recognition of depreciation is adjusted prospectively, as necessary, to reduce the carrying amount of the real estate to its estimated disposition value over the remaining period that the real estate is expected to be held and used. We may adjust depreciation of properties that are expected to be disposed of or redeveloped prior to the end of their useful lives.
We use the “held-for-sale” impairment model for our properties classified as “held-for-sale.” The “held-for-sale” impairment model is different from the held-and-used impairment model. Under the “held-for-sale” impairment model, an impairment loss is recognized if the amount of the long-lived asset classified as “held-for-sale” exceeds its fair value less cost to sell. Because of these two different models, it is possible for a long-lived asset previously classified as held and used to require the recognition of an impairment charge upon classification as “held-for-sale.”
On a quarterly basis, we review current activities and changes in the business conditions of all of our properties prior to and subsequent to the end of each quarter to determine the existence of any triggering events requiring an impairment analysis. If triggering events are identified, we review an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows for the properties, including a probability-weighted approach if multiple outcomes are under consideration.
Investments
We hold equity investments in certain publicly traded companies and investments in certain privately held entities primarily involved in the science industry. All of our investments in actively traded public companies are considered “available-for-sale” and are reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at fair value. Fair value has been determined based upon the closing price as of each balance sheet date, with unrealized gains and losses shown as a separate component of comprehensive income. The classification of each investment is determined at the time each investment is made, and such determination is reevaluated at each balance sheet date. The cost of each investment sold is determined by the specific identification method, with realized gains or losses classified in other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Investments in privately held entities are generally accounted for under the cost method when our interest in the entity is so minor that we have virtually no influence over the entity’s operating and financial policies. Certain investments in privately held entities are accounted for under the equity method unless our interest in the entity is deemed to be so minor that we have virtually no influence over the entity’s operating and financial policies. Under the equity method of accounting, we recognize our investment initially at cost and adjust the amount of the investment to recognize our share of the earnings or losses of the investee subsequent to the date of our investment. Additionally, we limit our ownership percentage in the voting stock of each individual entity to less than
10%
. As of
June 30, 2015
, and December 31,
2014
, our ownership percentage in the voting stock of each individual entity was less than
10%
.
We monitor each of our equity investments throughout the year for new developments, including operating results, results of clinical trials, capital-raising events, and merger and acquisition activities. Individual investments are evaluated for impairment when changes in conditions may indicate an impairment exists. The factors that we consider in making these assessments include, but are not limited to, market prices, market conditions, available financing, prospects for favorable or unfavorable clinical trial results, new product initiatives, and new collaborative agreements. If there are no identified events or changes in circumstances that might have an adverse effect on our cost method investments, we do not estimate the investment’s fair value. For all of our investments, if a decline in the fair value of an investment below the carrying value is determined to be other than temporary, such investment is written down to its estimated fair value with a charge to current earnings.
13
2.
Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Recognition of rental income and tenant recoveries
Rental income from leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective lease terms. We classify amounts currently recognized as income, and expected to be received in later years as deferred rent in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Amounts received currently but recognized as income in future years are classified in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We commence recognition of rental income at the date the property is ready for its intended use and the client tenant takes possession or controls the physical use of the property.
Tenant recoveries related to reimbursement of real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, repairs and maintenance, common area expenses, and other operating expenses are recognized as revenue in the period during which the applicable expenses are incurred.
Tenant receivables consist primarily of amounts due for contractual lease payments, reimbursements of common area maintenance expenses, property taxes, and other expenses recoverable from client tenants. Tenant receivables are expected to be collected within
one year
. We may maintain an allowance for estimated losses that may result from the inability of our client tenants to make payments required under the terms of the lease and for tenant recoveries due. If a client tenant fails to make contractual payments beyond any allowance, we may recognize additional bad debt expense in future periods equal to the amount of uncollectible tenant receivables and deferred rent arising from the straight-lining of rent. As of
June 30, 2015
, and December 31,
2014
, we had
no
allowance for uncollectible tenant receivables and deferred rent.
Monitoring client tenant credit quality
During the term of each lease, we monitor the credit quality of our client tenants by (i) reviewing the credit rating of client tenants that are rated by a nationally recognized credit rating agency, (ii) reviewing financial statements of the client tenants that are publicly available or that are required to be delivered to us pursuant to the applicable lease, (iii) monitoring news reports regarding our client tenants and their respective businesses, and (iv) monitoring the timeliness of lease payments. We have a team of employees who, among them, have graduate and undergraduate degrees in biology, chemistry, and industrial biotechnology and experience in the science and technology industries, as well as in finance. Our research team is responsible for assessing and monitoring the credit quality of our client tenants and any material changes in their credit quality.
Other income
The following is a summary of the other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of income for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
(in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Management fee income
$
257
$
916
$
811
$
1,642
Interest and other income
379
911
864
1,773
Investment income (loss)
2,121
(1,361
)
5,833
985
Total other income
$
2,757
$
466
$
7,508
$
4,400
Income taxes
We are organized and qualify as a REIT pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). Under the Code, a REIT that distributes at least
90%
of its REIT taxable income to its shareholders annually and meets certain other conditions is not subject to federal income taxes, but could be subject to certain state and local taxes. We distribute
100%
of our taxable income annually; therefore, a provision for federal income taxes is not required. In addition to our REIT returns, we file federal, state, and local tax returns for our subsidiaries. We file with jurisdictions located in the U.S., Canada, India, China, and other international locations. Our tax returns are subject to routine examination in various jurisdictions for calendar years 2010 through 2013.
14
2.
Basis of presentation and summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Recent accounting pronouncements
In February 2015, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update that requires reporting entities to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. The Accounting Standards Update modifies the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are VIEs or voting interest entities and eliminates the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership. This Accounting Standards Update affects the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related-party relationships. The Accounting Standards Update is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. A reporting entity may apply the amendments in the Accounting Standards Update by (i) using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption or (ii) applying the amendments retrospectively. We are currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of the Accounting Standards Update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2015, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update that requires reporting entities to present debt issuance costs as a direct deduction from the face amount of the related note payable presented in the balance sheet. The Accounting Standards Update is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. A reporting entity is required to apply the amendments in the Accounting Standards Update retrospectively to all prior periods. We are currently assessing the potential impact that the adoption of the Accounting Standards Update will have on our consolidated financial statements.
15
3.
Investments in real estate
Our investments in real estate consisted of the following as of
June 30, 2015
, and December 31,
2014
(in thousands):
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Land (related to rental properties)
$
683,670
$
624,681
Buildings and building improvements
6,690,157
6,171,504
Other improvements
234,393
192,128
Rental properties
7,608,220
6,988,313
Current value-creation projects/Construction in progress (CIP):
Current development in North America
409,619
500,894
Current redevelopment in North America
—
42,482
Current development in Asia
—
14,065
409,619
557,441
Rental properties and current value-creation projects
8,017,839
7,545,754
Near-term value-creation projects in North America (CIP):
Alexandria Center
®
at Kendall Square – Binney Street
(1)
140,488
321,907
Other projects
105,623
107,471
246,111
429,378
Future value-creation projects:
North America
183,984
175,175
Asia
78,911
78,548
262,895
253,723
Near-term and future value-creation projects
509,006
683,101
Value-creation pipeline
918,625
1,240,542
Gross investments in real estate
8,526,845
8,228,855
Equity method of accounting – unconsolidated joint ventures
121,055
117,406
Gross investments in real estate – including unconsolidated joint ventures
8,647,900
8,346,261
Less: accumulated depreciation
(1,205,025
)
(1,120,245
)
Investments in real estate
$
7,442,875
$
7,226,016
(1)
Includes amounts related to 100 Binney Street as of June 30, 2015, and 50, 60, and 100 Binney Street as of December 31, 2014.
Acquisitions
During the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, we acquired real estate and real estate related assets with an aggregate purchase price of
$327.2 million
, consisting of
one
operating property, including the assumption of debt,
two
land parcels, and the outstanding noncontrolling interest related to
seven
operating properties.
16
3.
Investments in real estate (continued)
Sales of real estate assets and related impairment charges
In June 2015, we completed the sale of 270 Third Street, a residential development project with
91
units at our Alexandria Center
®
at Kendall Square in our Cambridge submarket in Greater Boston, for a sales price of
$43.0 million
. The net proceeds of
$25.5 million
reflect the assumption by the buyer of the cost to complete the construction of
$17.5 million
. The net proceeds from the sale approximated our carrying amount.
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we completed the sale of our land and land improvements at 661 University Avenue in Toronto, Canada, for
$54.1 million
. In December 2014, we recognized an impairment charge of
$16.6 million
to lower the carrying costs of this property to its estimated fair value less cost to sell, including an estimated
$5.0 million
foreign exchange loss. Also, during the three months ended March 31, 2015, we sold a
21,859
RSF rental property located in Pennsylvania for
$1.9 million
. The sales price less cost to sell for this property approximated its carrying value at the time of sale and resulted in no gain or loss on sale.
During the three months ended December 31, 2014, we placed into service a
175,000
RSF building in Hyderabad, India. We completed a probability-weighted cash flow analysis for this building, inclusive of the estimated costs to complete, and determined that the estimated undiscounted cash flows exceeded the carrying amount of the building as of December 31, 2014.
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we determined that this building in Hyderabad, India, met the criteria for classification as “held-for-sale,” including, among others, the following: (i) management committed to sell the real estate and executed a purchase and sale agreement on March 23, 2015, and (ii) management determined that the sale was probable within one year. Upon classification as “held for sale,” we recognized an impairment charge of
$14.5 million
to lower the carrying costs of the real estate to its estimated fair value less cost to sell, including an estimated
$4.2 million
foreign exchange loss. On March 26, 2015, we completed the sale of the building to the Indian multispecialty healthcare provider for
$12.4 million
.
As a result of our sales in Canada and India discussed above, our statement of comprehensive income reflects an aggregate
$9.2 million
of losses that we realized during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, related to foreign currency exchange translation losses, noted above, that were previously classified in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Current value-creation development and redevelopment projects
As of
June 30, 2015
, we had
eight
ground-up development projects, including
two
unconsolidated joint venture development projects, in process in North America. The projects at completion will aggregate
2.6 million
RSF. An aggregate of
2.0 million
RSF are currently in construction in progress, with the remainder already placed into service.
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
Refer to our consolidation policy described in Note 2 – “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” regarding the following two unconsolidated joint ventures.
360 Longwood Avenue
We are currently developing a building aggregating
413,536
RSF in our Longwood Medical submarket of the Greater Boston market through an unconsolidated joint venture. The cost at completion for this unconsolidated joint venture real estate project is approximately
$350.0 million
. As of
June 30, 2015
, the project was
63%
leased and
209,628
RSF, or
51%
, has been placed in service. The joint venture has a secured construction loan with commitments aggregating
$213.2 million
,
$170.5 million
of which was outstanding
as of June 30, 2015
. The remaining cost to complete the development is expected to be funded primarily from the remaining commitments of
$42.7 million
under the secured construction loan. The secured construction loan bears interest at LIBOR+3.75%, with a floor of 5.25%. The maturity date of the loan is April 1, 2017, with
two
, one-year options to extend the stated maturity date to April 1, 2019, subject to certain conditions.
We have a
27.5%
interest in this unconsolidated joint venture that we account for under the equity method of accounting. Our investment under the equity method of accounting was
$49.7 million
as of
June 30, 2015
, and is classified in investments in real estate in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
17
3.
Investments in real estate (continued)
1455/1515 Third Street
In September 2014, Alexandria and Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”), entered into a joint venture agreement and acquired two land parcels supporting the development of two buildings aggregating
422,980
RSF at 1455/1515 Third Street in the Mission Bay submarket of the San Francisco market for a total purchase price of
$125.0 million
. We have a
51%
interest and Uber has a
49%
interest in this unconsolidated joint venture. The purchase price was funded by contributions into the joint venture by Uber and us. We account for our investment in this joint venture under the equity method of accounting. Our investment under the equity method of accounting was
$71.3 million
as of
June 30, 2015
, and was classified in investments in real estate in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The project is expected to be funded by equity contributions from Uber and us. The joint venture may also fund a portion of the project with proceeds from a secured construction loan. The project is
100%
leased to Uber for a
15
-year term.
Near-term value-creation projects in North America (CIP)
Land undergoing predevelopment activities is classified as CIP and is undergoing activities prior to commencement of construction of aboveground building improvements. We generally will not commence ground-up development of any parcels without first securing pre-leasing for such space, except when there is solid market demand. If aboveground construction is not initiated at completion of predevelopment activities, the land parcel will be classified as future value-creation projects. Our objective with predevelopment is to reduce the time it takes to deliver projects to prospective client tenants. Additionally, during predevelopment, we focus on the design of cost-effective buildings with generic and reusable infrastructure to accommodate single-tenancy and multi-tenancy. As of
June 30, 2015
, we had
$246.1 million
of land undergoing predevelopment activities in North America aggregating
2.0 million
square feet.
Predevelopment costs generally include the following activities prior to commencement of vertical construction:
•
Traditional predevelopment costs, including entitlement, design, construction drawings, BIM (3-D virtual modeling), budgeting, sustainability and energy optimization reviews, permitting, and planning for all aspects of the project; and
•
Site and infrastructure construction costs, including belowground site work, utility connections, land grading, drainage, egress and regress access points, foundation, and other costs to prepare the site for construction of aboveground building improvements.
Future value-creation projects
Future value-creation projects represent land that we plan to develop in the future, but for which, as of each period presented, no construction or predevelopment activities were ongoing. As a result, interest, property taxes, insurance, and other costs are expensed as incurred. As of
June 30, 2015
, we had
$262.9 million
of land held for future development supporting an aggregate of
10.2 million
square feet of ground-up development.
18
4.
Investments
Our investments in privately held entities are primarily accounted for under the cost method. Our investments in publicly traded companies are principally marketable equity securities that are accounted for as “available-for-sale” marketable equity securities that are carried at their fair values. Investments in “available-for-sale” marketable equity securities with gross unrealized losses as of
June 30, 2015
, had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months. We have the ability and intent to hold these investments for a reasonable period of time sufficient for the recovery of our investment. We believe that these unrealized losses are temporary; accordingly, there are no other-than-temporary impairments in accumulated other comprehensive income related to “available-for-sale” marketable equity securities as of
June 30, 2015
, or December 31,
2014
.
The following table summarizes our investments as of
June 30, 2015
, and December 31, 2014 (in thousands):
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
“Available-for-sale” marketable equity securities, cost basis
$
33,897
$
21,898
Unrealized gains
139,459
53,625
Unrealized losses
(791
)
(1,258
)
“Available-for-sale” marketable equity securities, at fair value
172,565
74,265
Investments accounted for under cost method
188,049
162,124
Total investments
$
360,614
$
236,389
The following table outlines our
investment income (loss)
, which is classified in other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of income (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Investment gains
$
7,773
$
2,185
$
13,710
$
6,225
Investment losses
(5,652
)
(3,546
)
(7,877
)
(5,240
)
Investment income (loss)
$
2,121
$
(1,361
)
$
5,833
$
985
5.
Fair value measurements
We are required to disclose fair value information about all financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. We measure and disclose the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities utilizing a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions. This hierarchy consists of three broad levels, as follows: (i) quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, (ii) “significant other observable inputs,” and (iii) “significant unobservable inputs.” “Significant other observable inputs” can include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. “Significant unobservable inputs” are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, since there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances in which the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. There were
no
transfers between the levels in the fair value hierarchy during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
.
19
5.
Fair value measurements (continued)
The following tables set forth the assets and liabilities that we measure at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy as of
June 30, 2015
, and
December 31, 2014
(in thousands):
June 30, 2015
Description
Total
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Assets:
“Available-for-sale” marketable equity securities
$
172,565
$
172,565
$
—
$
—
Interest rate swap agreements
$
19
$
—
$
19
$
—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap agreements
$
3,951
$
—
$
3,951
$
—
December 31, 2014
Description
Total
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
Assets:
“Available-for-sale” marketable equity securities
$
74,265
$
74,265
$
—
$
—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap agreements
$
909
$
—
$
909
$
—
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, tenant receivables, other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits approximate fair value. Our “available-for-sale” marketable equity securities and our interest rate swap agreements have been recognized at fair value. Refer to Note 7 – “Interest Rate Swap Agreements,” for further details on our interest rate swap agreements. The fair values of our secured notes payable, unsecured senior notes payable, unsecured senior line of credit, and unsecured senior bank term loans were estimated using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analyses of “significant other observable inputs” such as available market information on discount and borrowing rates with similar terms, maturities, and credit ratings. Because the valuations of our financial instruments are based on these types of estimates, the actual fair value of our financial instruments may differ materially if our estimates do not prove to be accurate. Additionally, the use of different market assumptions or estimation methods may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
As of
June 30, 2015
, and
December 31, 2014
, the book and estimated fair values of our “available-for-sale” marketable equity securities, interest rate swap agreements, secured notes payable, unsecured senior notes payable, unsecured senior line of credit, and unsecured senior bank term loans were as follows (in thousands):
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Book Value
Fair Value
Book Value
Fair Value
Assets:
“Available-for-sale” marketable equity securities
$
172,565
$
172,565
$
74,265
$
74,265
Interest rate swap agreements
$
19
$
19
$
—
$
—
Liabilities:
Interest rate swap agreements
$
3,951
$
3,951
$
909
$
909
Secured notes payable
$
771,435
$
801,330
$
652,209
$
693,338
Unsecured senior notes payable
$
1,747,531
$
1,782,455
$
1,747,370
$
1,793,255
Unsecured senior line of credit
$
624,000
$
624,207
$
304,000
$
304,369
Unsecured senior bank term loans
$
950,000
$
953,387
$
975,000
$
976,010
Fair value measurements for other than on a non-recurring basis
Refer to Note 3 – “Investments in Real Estate” and Note 11 – “Noncontrolling Interests.”
20
6.
Secured and unsecured senior debt
The following table summarizes our secured and unsecured senior debt as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
Fixed-Rate/Hedged
Variable-Rate
Unhedged
Variable-Rate
Total
Consolidated
Percentage of Total Debt
Weighted-Average
Interest Rate at
End of Period
(1)
Weighted-Average
Remaining Term
(in years)
Secured notes payable
$
480,340
$
291,095
$
771,435
18.8
%
4.25
%
2.9
Unsecured senior notes payable
1,747,531
—
1,747,531
42.7
3.98
7.8
$1.5 billion unsecured senior line of credit
—
624,000
624,000
15.2
1.22
3.5
2019 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan
600,000
—
600,000
14.7
1.71
3.5
2021 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan
350,000
—
350,000
8.6
1.52
5.5
Total/weighted average
$
3,177,871
$
915,095
$
4,092,966
100.0
%
3.07
%
5.4
Percentage of total debt
78
%
22
%
100
%
(1)
Represents the weighted-average interest rate as of the end of the period plus the impact of debt premiums/discounts and our interest rate swap agreements. The weighted-average interest rate excludes bank fees and amortization of loan fees.
21
6.
Secured and unsecured senior debt (continued)
The following table summarizes our outstanding indebtedness and respective principal maturities as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
Stated
Rate
Weighted- Average
Interest Rate
(1)
Maturity Date
(2)
Principal Payments Remaining for the Periods Ending December 31,
Debt
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter
Total
Secured notes payable
Greater Boston, San Francisco, and San Diego
5.73
%
5.73
%
1/1/16
$
914
$
75,501
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
76,415
Greater Boston, San Diego, and New York City
5.82
5.82
4/1/16
494
29,389
—
—
—
—
29,883
San Diego
5.74
3.00
4/15/16
88
6,916
—
—
—
—
7,004
San Francisco
L+1.40
1.59
6/1/16
(3)
—
20,631
—
—
—
—
20,631
San Francisco
L+1.50
1.69
7/1/16
(4)
—
47,183
—
—
—
—
47,183
San Francisco
6.35
6.35
8/1/16
1,313
126,715
—
—
—
—
128,028
Maryland
2.17
2.17
1/20/17
—
—
76,000
—
—
—
76,000
Greater Boston
L+1.35
1.54
8/23/17
(5)
—
—
147,281
—
—
—
147,281
San Diego, Maryland, and Seattle
7.75
7.75
4/1/20
800
1,696
1,832
1,979
2,138
104,352
112,797
San Diego
4.66
4.66
1/1/23
703
1,464
1,540
1,614
1,692
31,674
38,687
Greater Boston
3.93
3.10
3/10/23
—
—
—
1,091
1,505
79,404
82,000
San Francisco
6.50
6.50
7/1/36
10
19
20
22
23
728
822
Unamortized premiums
367
610
573
588
595
1,971
4,704
Secured notes payable weighted-average/subtotal
4.37
%
4.25
4,689
310,124
227,246
5,294
5,953
218,129
771,435
2019 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan
L+1.20
%
1.71
1/3/19
—
—
—
—
600,000
—
600,000
2021 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan
L+1.10
%
1.52
1/15/21
—
—
—
—
—
350,000
350,000
$1.5 billion unsecured senior line of credit
L+1.10
%
(6)
1.22
1/3/19
—
—
—
—
624,000
—
624,000
Unsecured senior notes payable
2.75
%
2.79
1/15/20
—
—
—
—
—
400,000
400,000
Unsecured senior notes payable
4.60
%
4.61
4/1/22
—
—
—
—
—
550,000
550,000
Unsecured senior notes payable
3.90
%
3.94
6/15/23
—
—
—
—
—
500,000
500,000
Unsecured senior notes payable
4.50
%
4.51
7/30/29
—
—
—
—
—
300,000
300,000
Unamortized discounts
(165
)
(337
)
(350
)
(362
)
(375
)
(880
)
(2,469
)
Unsecured debt weighted-average/subtotal
2.79
(165
)
(337
)
(350
)
(362
)
1,223,625
2,099,120
3,321,531
Weighted-average/total
3.07
%
$
4,524
$
309,787
$
226,896
$
4,932
$
1,229,578
$
2,317,249
$
4,092,966
Balloon payments
$
—
$
304,713
$
223,281
$
—
$
1,224,000
$
2,304,466
$
4,056,460
Principal amortization
4,524
5,074
3,615
4,932
5,578
12,783
36,506
Total consolidated debt
$
4,524
$
309,787
$
226,896
$
4,932
$
1,229,578
$
2,317,249
$
4,092,966
Fixed-rate/hedged variable-rate debt
$
4,524
$
241,973
$
3,615
$
4,932
$
605,578
$
2,317,249
$
3,177,871
Unhedged variable-rate debt
—
67,814
223,281
—
624,000
—
915,095
Total consolidated debt
$
4,524
$
309,787
$
226,896
$
4,932
$
1,229,578
$
2,317,249
$
4,092,966
(1)
Represents the weighted-average interest rate as of the end of the period plus the impact of debt premiums/discounts and our interest rate swap agreements. The weighted-average interest rate excludes bank fees and amortization of loan fees.
(2)
Includes any extension options that we control.
(3)
We have two, one-year options to extend the stated maturity date to June 1, 2018, subject to certain conditions.
(4)
We have a one-year option to extend the stated maturity date to July 1, 2017, subject to certain conditions.
(5)
We have a one-year option to extend the stated maturity date to August 23, 2018, subject to certain conditions.
(6)
Our unsecured senior line of credit contains a feature that allows lenders to competitively bid on the interest rate for borrowings under the facility. This may result in an interest rate that is below the stated rate of LIBOR+1.10%. In addition to the cost of borrowing, the facility is subject to an annual facility fee of
0.20%
, based on the aggregate commitments outstanding.
22
6.
Secured and unsecured senior debt (continued)
Interest expense
The following table summarizes interest expense for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2015
and 2014 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Gross interest
$
35,105
$
28,735
$
69,312
$
59,871
Capitalized interest
(8,437
)
(11,302
)
(19,408
)
(23,315
)
Interest expense
$
26,668
$
17,433
$
49,904
$
36,556
Amendment of unsecured senior bank term loan
In June 2015, we completed a partial principal repayment of
$25.0 million
and extended the maturity of the remaining
$350.0 million
unsecured senior bank term loan (“2021 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan”) from July 31, 2015, to June 30, 2019, subject to our option to extend the maturity up to three times upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, for an additional term of six months for the first and second extensions and for an additional term ending on January 15, 2021, for the third extension. In addition, we reduced the applicable interest rate margin with respect to borrowings outstanding under the loan to LIBOR+1.10% from LIBOR+1.20%. In conjunction with the amendment of our 2021 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan and the principal repayment, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt aggregating
$189 thousand
related to the write-off of a portion of unamortized loan fees.
Secured construction loans
In June 2015, we exercised the first of two, one-year extensions on a
$47.2 million
secured construction loan, which extended the maturity date from July 1, 2015, to July 1, 2016.
The following table summarizes our secured construction loans as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
Market
Stated Rate
Maturity Date
Outstanding Balance
Remaining Commitments
Total Commitments
San Francisco
L+1.40
%
6/1/16
(1)
$
20,631
$
15,369
$
36,000
San Francisco
L+1.50
%
7/1/16
(2)
47,183
7,817
55,000
Greater Boston
L+1.35
%
8/23/17
(3)
147,281
103,119
250,400
$
215,095
$
126,305
$
341,400
(1)
We have
two
, one-year options to extend the stated maturity date to June 1, 2018, subject to certain conditions.
(2)
We have a one-year option to extend the stated maturity date to July 1, 2017, subject to certain conditions.
(3)
We have a
one
-year option to extend the stated maturity date to August 23, 2018, subject to certain conditions.
23
7.
Interest rate swap agreements
We use interest rate swap agreements to hedge the variable cash flows associated with certain of our existing LIBOR-based variable-rate debt, including our unsecured senior line of credit and unsecured senior bank term loans. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of our interest rate swap agreements is required to be recognized directly in earnings. During the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
, our interest rate swap agreements were
100%
effective; as a result,
no
hedge ineffectiveness was recognized in earnings. Changes in fair value, including accrued interest and adjustments for non-performance risk, on the effective portion of our interest rate swap agreements that are designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges are classified in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Amounts classified in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedged transactions affect earnings. During the next 12 months, we expect to reclassify approximately
$2.4 million
in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings as an increase to interest expense. As of
June 30, 2015
, and
December 31, 2014
, the fair values of our interest rate swap agreements aggregating an asset balance were classified in other assets, and those aggregating a liability balance were classified in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits, based upon their respective fair values, without any offsetting pursuant to master netting agreements. Refer to Note 5 – “Fair Value Measurements.” Under our interest rate swap agreements, we have
no
collateral posting requirements.
The Company has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision wherein (i) the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to the Company’s default on the indebtedness; or (ii) if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. If the Company had breached any of these provisions as of
June 30, 2015
, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of
$4.0 million
.
We had the following outstanding interest rate swap agreements that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
Number of Contracts
Weighted-Average Interest Pay Rate
(1)
Fair Value as of 6/30/15
Notional Amount in Effect as of
Effective Date
Maturity Date
6/30/15
12/31/15
12/31/16
12/31/17
December 31, 2014
March 31, 2016
3
0.53%
$
(804
)
$
500,000
$
500,000
$
—
$
—
March 31, 2015
March 31, 2016
7
0.42%
(370
)
450,000
450,000
—
—
March 31, 2016
March 31, 2017
9
1.25%
(2,501
)
—
—
800,000
—
March 31, 2017
March 31, 2018
4
1.76%
(257
)
—
—
—
200,000
Total
$
(3,932
)
$
950,000
$
950,000
$
800,000
$
200,000
(1)
In addition to the interest pay rate for each swap agreement, interest is payable at an applicable margin for borrowings outstanding as of
June 30, 2015
. Borrowings under our 2019 unsecured senior bank term loan (“2019 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan”) include an applicable margin of
1.20%
, and borrowings outstanding under our unsecured senior line of credit and 2021 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan include an applicable margin of
1.10%
.
During July 2015, we executed the following additional interest rate swap agreements that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk (dollars in thousands):
Number of Contracts
Weighted-Average Interest Pay Rate
(1)
Fair Value as of 6/30/15
Notional Amount in Effect as of
Effective Date
Maturity Date
6/30/15
12/31/15
12/31/16
12/31/17
March 31, 2017
March 31, 2018
3
1.51%
none
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
150,000
(1)
In addition to the interest pay rate for each swap agreement, interest is payable at an applicable margin for borrowings outstanding as of
June 30, 2015
. Borrowings under our 2019 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan include an applicable margin of
1.20%
, and borrowings outstanding under our unsecured senior line of credit and 2021 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan include an applicable margin of
1.10%
.
24
8. Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits
The following table summarizes the components of accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits as of
June 30, 2015
, and
December 31, 2014
(in thousands):
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
126,510
$
127,828
Accrued construction
59,849
91,110
Acquired below-market leases
28,135
8,810
Conditional asset retirement obligations
8,912
9,108
Deferred rent liabilities
27,780
36,231
Interest rate swap liabilities
3,951
909
Prepaid rent and tenant security deposits
202,372
193,699
Other liabilities
(1)
74,103
21,390
Total
$
531,612
$
489,085
(1)
Our
June 30, 2015
, balance includes a
$54.0 million
liability related to the second installment payment for our acquisition of the remaining noncontrolling interest in our
1.2 million
RSF flagship campus at Alexandria Technology Square
®
. For additional information, refer to Note 11 – “Noncontrolling Interests” to our unaudited consolidated financial statements under Item 1 of this report.
25
9.
Earnings per share
We use income from continuing operations attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders as the “control number” in determining whether potential common shares are dilutive or antidilutive to EPS. Pursuant to the presentation and disclosure literature on gains or losses on sales or disposals by REITs and EPS required by the SEC and the FASB, gains or losses on sales or disposals by a REIT that do not qualify as discontinued operations are classified below income from discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and included in the numerator for the computation of EPS for income from continuing operations.
We account for unvested restricted stock awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends as participating securities and include these securities in the computation of EPS using the two-class method. Our 7% series D cumulative convertible preferred stock (“Series D Convertible Preferred Stock”) is not a participating security, and is not included in the computation of EPS using the two-class method. Under the two-class method, we allocate net income after preferred stock dividends, preferred stock redemption charge, and amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests to common stockholders and unvested restricted stock awards based on their respective participation rights to dividends declared (or accumulated) and undistributed earnings. Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding determined for the basic EPS computation plus the effect of any dilutive securities. We had
no
dilutive securities outstanding during the three and
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
.
The table below is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
(in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Income from continuing operations
$
38,430
$
35,466
$
63,481
$
76,377
Gain on sales of real estate – land parcels
—
797
—
797
Dividends on preferred stock
(6,246
)
(6,472
)
(12,493
)
(12,943
)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(263
)
(1,307
)
(755
)
(2,502
)
Net income attributable to unvested restricted stock awards
(630
)
(405
)
(1,113
)
(779
)
Income from continuing operations attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – basic and diluted
31,291
28,079
49,120
60,950
Loss from discontinued operations
—
(147
)
(43
)
(309
)
Net income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – basic and diluted
$
31,291
$
27,932
$
49,077
$
60,641
Weighted-average shares of common stock
outstanding – basic and diluted
71,412
71,126
71,389
71,100
EPS attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – basic and diluted:
Continuing operations
$
0.44
$
0.39
$
0.69
$
0.85
Discontinued operations
—
—
—
—
EPS – basic and diluted
$
0.44
$
0.39
$
0.69
$
0.85
26
9.
Stockholders’ equity (continued)
10.
Stockholders’ equity
“At the market” common stock offering program
During the three months ended
June 30, 2015
, we sold an aggregate of
56,874
shares of common stock for gross proceeds of
$5.3 million
at an average stock price of
$94.02
and net proceeds of approximately
$5.1 million
, including commissions and other expenses of approximately
$295 thousand
.
Dividends
In June 2015, we declared cash dividends on our common stock for the
second quarter
of 2015, aggregating
$55.7 million
, or
$0.77
per share. Also in June 2015, we declared cash dividends on our Series D Convertible Preferred Stock for the
second quarter
of 2015, aggregating approximately
$4.2 million
, or
$0.4375
per share. Additionally, we declared cash dividends on our Series E cumulative redeemable preferred stock (“Series E Preferred Stock”) for the
second quarter
of 2015, aggregating approximately
$2.1 million
, or
$0.403125
per share. In July 2015, we paid the cash dividends on our common stock, Series D Preferred Stock, and Series E Preferred Stock for the
second quarter
of 2015.
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Alexandria consists of the following (in thousands):
Unrealized Gain on Marketable Securities
Unrealized Loss on Interest Rate Swap Agreements
Unrealized Loss on Foreign Currency Translation
Total
Balance as of December 31, 2014
$
52,367
$
(909
)
$
(52,086
)
$
(628
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
83,836
(4,238
)
(7,778
)
71,820
Amounts reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss)
2,465
1,215
9,236
12,916
86,301
(3,023
)
1,458
84,736
Amounts attributable to noncontrolling interest
—
—
(128
)
(128
)
Net other comprehensive income (loss)
86,301
(3,023
)
1,330
84,608
Balance as of June 30, 2015
$
138,668
$
(3,932
)
$
(50,756
)
$
83,980
Preferred stock and excess stock authorizations
Our charter authorizes the issuance of up to
100.0 million
shares of preferred stock, of which
14.7 million
shares were issued and outstanding as of
June 30, 2015
. In addition,
200.0 million
shares of “excess stock” (as defined in our charter) are authorized,
none
of which were issued and outstanding as of
June 30, 2015
.
27
11.
Noncontrolling interests
Noncontrolling interests represent the third-party interests in certain entities in which we have a controlling interest. These entities owned
four
projects as of
June 30, 2015
, and are included in our consolidated financial statements. Noncontrolling interests are adjusted for additional contributions and distributions, the proportionate share of the net earnings or losses, and other comprehensive income or loss. Distributions, profits, and losses related to these entities are allocated in accordance with the respective operating agreements.
The following table represents income from continuing operations and discontinued operations attributable to Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc., for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2015
and 2014, excluding the amounts attributable to these noncontrolling interests:
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Income from continuing operations attributable to Alexandria
$
38,167
$
34,956
$
62,726
$
74,672
Loss from discontinued operations
$
—
$
(147
)
$
(43
)
$
(309
)
Certain of our noncontrolling interests have the right to require us to redeem their ownership interests in the respective entities. We classify these ownership interests in the entities as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of total equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Redeemable noncontrolling interests are adjusted for additional contributions and distributions, the proportionate share of the net earnings or losses, and other comprehensive income or loss. Distributions, profits, and losses related to these entities are allocated in accordance with the respective operating agreements. If the amount of a redeemable noncontrolling interest is less than the maximum redemption value at the balance sheet date, such amount is adjusted to the maximum redemption value. Subsequent declines in the redemption value are recognized only to the extent that previous increases have been recognized.
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we executed an agreement to purchase the outstanding
10%
noncontrolling interest in our
1.2 million
RSF flagship campus at Alexandria Technology Square
®
for
$108.3 million
. The first installment of
$54.3 million
was paid on April 1, 2015, and the second installment of
$54.0 million
is due on April 1, 2016. Upon execution of the purchase agreement, we recognized a liability representing the fair value of the aggregate consideration, primarily consisting of the purchase price in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. We measured the fair value of the liability using significant observable inputs, including a discount rate that approximates our cost of debt capital in effect during the period the liability is outstanding. The difference between the noncontrolling interest purchase liability and the noncontrolling interest balance of
$48.5 million
was recognized as a reduction of additional paid-in capital.
28
12.
Assets classified as “held for sale”
On October 1, 2014, we adopted an Accounting Standards Update on the reporting of discontinued operations that raised the threshold for classification of assets “held for sale” as discontinued operations. This Accounting Standards Update was applied prospectively, and since our adoption of this Accounting Standards Update, no additional properties have met the criteria for classification as a discontinued operation in our consolidated financial statements. Prior to the adoption of this Accounting Standards Update, certain properties met the previous criteria for classification as discontinued operations. As of
June 30, 2015
, none of our properties qualified for classification as discontinued operations.
The following is a summary of net assets “held for sale” as of
June 30, 2015
, and
December 31, 2014
, including the assets classified as “held for sale” subsequent to our adoption of the new Accounting Standards Update (in thousands):
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Properties classified as “held for sale”
$
114,456
$
173,706
Other assets
5,501
10,147
Total assets
119,957
183,853
Total liabilities
—
(6,044
)
Net assets classified as “held for sale”
(1)
$
119,957
$
177,809
(1)
As of
June 30, 2015
, net assets classified as “held for sale” were composed of
two
properties.
The following is a summary of the income (loss) included in our income from continuing operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
, from assets classified as “held for sale” subsequent to our adoption of the new Accounting Standards Update (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Total revenues
$
2,497
$
2,426
$
4,827
$
4,926
Operating expenses
(999
)
(781
)
(1,765
)
(1,482
)
Total revenues less operating expenses from assets classified as “held for sale,” not qualifying for classification as discontinued operations
1,498
1,645
3,062
3,444
Depreciation expense
—
(1,782
)
(127
)
(3,673
)
Impairment of real estate
—
—
(14,510
)
—
Income (loss) from assets classified as “held for sale,” not qualifying as discontinued operations
(1)
$
1,498
$
(137
)
$
(11,575
)
$
(229
)
(1)
Includes the results of operations of
two
properties with an aggregate
234,186
RSF that were classified as “held for sale” as of
June 30, 2015
, and
three
properties with an aggregate
196,859
RSF that were sold during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, but do not qualify for classification as discontinued operations. For additional information, refer to Note 2 – “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
29
13.
Subsequent events
Sale of 225 Binney Street
In July 2015, we executed an agreement to sell a
70%
interest in our
305,212
RSF, property at 225 Binney Street in our Cambridge submarket in Greater Boston to a high quality institutional investor for
$190.1 million
. We expect to complete the sale in the fourth quarter of 2015.
Commencement of value-creation development project at 100 Binney Street
In July 2015, we commenced development of a
431,483
RSF value-creation project at 100 Binney Street in our Cambridge submarket; it is
98%
leased/negotiating, including
48%
leased to
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
.
Acquisition of 10290 Campus Point Drive
In July 2015, we acquired 10290 Campus Point Drive, a property aggregating
304,326
RSF. This highly strategic acquisition is located adjacent to our uniquely positioned life science campus at the Alexandria Center
®
for Life Science at Campus Pointe with high-quality on-site amenities in the heart of our University Town Center submarket. The acquired property is
100%
leased to the previous owner through September 30, 2015. In June 2015, we leased the entire
304,326
RSF to Eli Lilly and Company for
15.5 years
. In October 2015, we expect to commence conversion of the space into Class A office/laboratory space through redevelopment. Upon completion of this redevelopment project, Eli Lilly and Company will relocate its existing presence at 10300 Campus Point Drive of
125,409
RSF and the previously announced
106,173
RSF expansion, into our recently acquired 10290 Campus Point Drive. These changes resulted in a net increase of
72,744
RSF leased to Eli Lilly and Company at the campus. Our campus will ultimately contain an aggregate of
1,046,472
RSF, including
292,387
RSF of capacity for future ground-up development.
30
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (the “Issuer”) has sold certain debt securities registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, that are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Alexandria Real Estate Equities, L.P. (the “LP” or the “Guarantor Subsidiary”), an indirectly 100% owned subsidiary of the Issuer. The Company’s other subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, the subsidiaries that own substantially all of its real estate (collectively, the “Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”), will not provide a guarantee of such securities, including the subsidiaries that are partially or 100% owned by the LP. The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the condensed consolidating balance sheets as of
June 30, 2015
, and
December 31, 2014
, the condensed consolidating statements of income and comprehensive income for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
, and the condensed consolidating cash flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
, for the Issuer, the Guarantor Subsidiary, and the Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, as well as the eliminations necessary to arrive at the information for Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc., on a consolidated basis, and consolidated amounts. In presenting the condensed consolidating financial statements, the equity method of accounting has been applied to (i) the Issuer’s interests in the Guarantor Subsidiary and the Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, (ii) the Guarantor Subsidiary’s interests in the Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, and (iii) the Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries’ interests in the Guarantor Subsidiary, where applicable, even though all such subsidiaries meet the requirements to be consolidated under GAAP. All intercompany balances and transactions between the Issuer, the Guarantor Subsidiary, and the Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries have been eliminated, as shown in the column “Eliminations.” All assets and liabilities have been allocated to the Issuer, the Guarantor Subsidiary, and the Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries generally based on legal entity ownership.
31
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
as of
June 30, 2015
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
(Issuer)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, L.P.
(Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Assets
Investments in real estate
$
—
$
—
$
7,442,875
$
—
$
7,442,875
Cash and cash equivalents
35,230
—
33,387
—
68,617
Restricted cash
74
—
44,117
—
44,191
Tenant receivables
—
—
9,279
—
9,279
Deferred rent
—
—
257,427
—
257,427
Deferred leasing and financing costs
33,666
—
177,043
—
210,709
Investments
—
5,274
355,340
—
360,614
Investments in and advances to affiliates
7,195,934
6,488,974
132,875
(13,817,783
)
—
Other assets
22,981
—
108,198
—
131,179
Total assets
$
7,287,885
$
6,494,248
$
8,560,541
$
(13,817,783
)
$
8,524,891
Liabilities, Noncontrolling Interests, and Equity
Secured notes payable
$
—
$
—
$
771,435
$
—
$
771,435
Unsecured senior notes payable
1,747,531
—
—
—
1,747,531
Unsecured senior line of credit
624,000
—
—
—
624,000
Unsecured senior bank term loans
950,000
—
—
—
950,000
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits
82,572
—
449,040
—
531,612
Dividends payable
60,906
—
288
—
61,194
Total liabilities
3,465,009
—
1,220,763
—
4,685,772
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
—
—
14,248
—
14,248
Alexandria’s stockholders’ equity
3,822,876
6,494,248
7,323,535
(13,817,783
)
3,822,876
Noncontrolling interests
—
—
1,995
—
1,995
Total equity
3,822,876
6,494,248
7,325,530
(13,817,783
)
3,824,871
Total liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and equity
$
7,287,885
$
6,494,248
$
8,560,541
$
(13,817,783
)
$
8,524,891
32
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
as of
December 31, 2014
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, Inc.
(Issuer)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, L.P.
(Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Assets
Investments in real estate
$
—
$
—
$
7,226,016
$
—
$
7,226,016
Cash and cash equivalents
52,491
63
33,457
—
86,011
Restricted cash
67
—
26,817
—
26,884
Tenant receivables
—
—
10,548
—
10,548
Deferred rent
—
—
234,124
—
234,124
Deferred leasing and financing costs
35,462
—
166,336
—
201,798
Investments
—
5,235
231,154
—
236,389
Investments in and advances to affiliates
6,874,866
6,295,852
128,943
(13,299,661
)
—
Other assets
19,461
—
94,805
—
114,266
Total assets
$
6,982,347
$
6,301,150
$
8,152,200
$
(13,299,661
)
$
8,136,036
Liabilities, Noncontrolling Interests, and Equity
Secured notes payable
$
—
$
—
$
652,209
$
—
$
652,209
Unsecured senior notes payable
1,747,370
—
—
—
1,747,370
Unsecured senior line of credit
304,000
—
—
—
304,000
Unsecured senior bank term loans
975,000
—
—
—
975,000
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits
69,013
—
420,072
—
489,085
Dividends payable
58,525
—
289
—
58,814
Total liabilities
3,153,908
—
1,072,570
—
4,226,478
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
—
—
14,315
—
14,315
Alexandria’s stockholders’ equity
3,828,439
6,301,150
6,998,511
(13,299,661
)
3,828,439
Noncontrolling interests
—
—
66,804
—
66,804
Total equity
3,828,439
6,301,150
7,065,315
(13,299,661
)
3,895,243
Total liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and equity
$
6,982,347
$
6,301,150
$
8,152,200
$
(13,299,661
)
$
8,136,036
33
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
for the
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, Inc.
(Issuer)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, L.P.
(Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Revenues:
Rental
$
—
$
—
$
151,805
$
—
$
151,805
Tenant recoveries
—
—
49,594
—
49,594
Other income
3,509
—
3,425
(4,177
)
2,757
Total revenues
3,509
—
204,824
(4,177
)
204,156
Expenses:
Rental operations
—
—
62,250
—
62,250
General and administrative
13,223
—
5,943
(4,177
)
14,989
Interest
19,867
—
6,801
—
26,668
Depreciation and amortization
1,469
—
60,702
—
62,171
Impairment of real estate
—
—
—
—
—
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
189
—
—
—
189
Total expenses
34,748
—
135,696
(4,177
)
166,267
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
—
—
541
—
541
Equity in earnings of affiliates
69,406
65,246
1,270
(135,922
)
—
Net income
38,167
65,246
70,939
(135,922
)
38,430
Dividends on preferred stock
(6,246
)
—
—
—
(6,246
)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
(263
)
—
(263
)
Net income attributable to unvested restricted stock awards
(630
)
—
—
—
(630
)
Net income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders
$
31,291
$
65,246
$
70,676
$
(135,922
)
$
31,291
34
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
for the
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, Inc.
(Issuer)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, L.P.
(Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Revenues:
Rental
$
—
$
—
$
134,992
$
—
$
134,992
Tenant recoveries
—
—
40,944
—
40,944
Other income
2,916
(1,535
)
2,532
(3,447
)
466
Total revenues
2,916
(1,535
)
178,468
(3,447
)
176,402
Expenses:
Rental operations
—
—
52,353
—
52,353
General and administrative
11,506
—
5,777
(3,447
)
13,836
Interest
12,493
—
4,940
—
17,433
Depreciation and amortization
1,456
—
55,858
—
57,314
Total expenses
25,455
—
118,928
(3,447
)
140,936
Equity in earnings of affiliates
57,355
56,302
1,081
(114,738
)
—
Income from continuing operations
34,816
54,767
60,621
(114,738
)
35,466
Loss from discontinued operations
(7
)
—
(140
)
—
(147
)
Gain on sales of real estate – land parcels
—
—
797
—
797
Net income
34,809
54,767
61,278
(114,738
)
36,116
Dividends on preferred stock
(6,472
)
—
—
—
(6,472
)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
(1,307
)
—
(1,307
)
Net income attributable to unvested restricted stock awards
(405
)
—
—
—
(405
)
Net income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders
$
27,932
$
54,767
$
59,971
$
(114,738
)
$
27,932
35
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
for the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, Inc.
(Issuer)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, L.P.
(Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Revenues:
Rental
$
—
$
—
$
295,413
$
—
$
295,413
Tenant recoveries
—
—
97,988
—
97,988
Other income
6,535
(41
)
8,989
(7,975
)
7,508
Total revenues
6,535
(41
)
402,390
(7,975
)
400,909
Expenses:
Rental operations
—
—
123,473
—
123,473
General and administrative
25,449
—
11,902
(7,975
)
29,376
Interest
37,024
—
12,880
—
49,904
Depreciation and amortization
2,716
—
118,375
—
121,091
Impairment of real estate
—
—
14,510
—
14,510
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
189
—
—
—
189
Total expenses
65,378
—
281,140
(7,975
)
338,543
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
—
—
1,115
—
1,115
Equity in earnings of affiliates
121,526
110,836
2,187
(234,549
)
—
Income from continuing operations
62,683
110,795
124,552
(234,549
)
63,481
Loss from discontinued operations
—
—
(43
)
—
(43
)
Net income
62,683
110,795
124,509
(234,549
)
63,438
Dividends on preferred stock
(12,493
)
—
—
—
(12,493
)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
(755
)
—
(755
)
Net income attributable to unvested restricted stock awards
(1,113
)
—
—
—
(1,113
)
Net income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders
$
49,077
$
110,795
$
123,754
$
(234,549
)
$
49,077
36
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
for the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, Inc.
(Issuer)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, L.P.
(Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Revenues:
Rental
$
—
$
—
$
265,562
$
—
$
265,562
Tenant recoveries
—
—
82,626
—
82,626
Other income
5,835
(1,535
)
7,165
(7,065
)
4,400
Total revenues
5,835
(1,535
)
355,353
(7,065
)
352,588
Expenses:
Rental operations
—
—
104,860
—
104,860
General and administrative
22,366
—
11,759
(7,065
)
27,060
Interest
26,032
—
10,524
—
36,556
Depreciation and amortization
2,927
—
104,808
—
107,735
Total expenses
51,325
—
231,951
(7,065
)
276,211
Equity in earnings of affiliates
119,860
114,608
2,229
(236,697
)
—
Income from continuing operations
74,370
113,073
125,631
(236,697
)
76,377
Loss from discontinued operations
(7
)
—
(302
)
—
(309
)
Gain on sales of real estate – land parcels
—
—
797
—
797
Net income
74,363
113,073
126,126
(236,697
)
76,865
Dividends on preferred stock
(12,943
)
—
—
—
(12,943
)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
(2,502
)
—
(2,502
)
Net income attributable to unvested restricted stock awards
(779
)
—
—
—
(779
)
Net income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders
$
60,641
$
113,073
$
123,624
$
(236,697
)
$
60,641
37
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, Inc.
(Issuer)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, L.P.
(Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Net income
$
38,167
$
65,246
$
70,939
$
(135,922
)
$
38,430
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized gains on marketable securities:
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period
—
76
55,325
—
55,401
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
—
—
1,362
—
1,362
Unrealized gains on marketable securities
—
76
56,687
—
56,763
Unrealized losses on interest rate swap agreements:
Unrealized interest rate swap losses arising during the period
(1,225
)
—
—
—
(1,225
)
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of interest income included in net income
710
—
—
—
710
Unrealized losses on interest rate swap agreements
(515
)
—
—
—
(515
)
Unrealized losses on foreign currency translation:
Unrealized foreign currency translation losses during the period
—
—
(1,507
)
—
(1,507
)
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
—
—
—
—
—
Unrealized losses on foreign currency translation
—
—
(1,507
)
—
(1,507
)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
(515
)
76
55,180
—
54,741
Comprehensive income
37,652
65,322
126,119
(135,922
)
93,171
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
(237
)
—
(237
)
Comprehensive income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders
$
37,652
$
65,322
$
125,882
$
(135,922
)
$
92,934
38
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, Inc.
(Issuer)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, L.P.
(Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Net income
$
34,809
$
54,767
$
61,278
$
(114,738
)
$
36,116
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period
—
310
(3,044
)
—
(2,734
)
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
—
—
406
—
406
Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities
—
310
(2,638
)
—
(2,328
)
Unrealized losses on interest rate swap agreements:
Unrealized interest rate swap losses arising during the period
(2,526
)
—
—
—
(2,526
)
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of interest expense included in net income
1,123
—
—
—
1,123
Unrealized losses on interest rate swap agreements
(1,403
)
—
—
—
(1,403
)
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains
—
—
5,915
—
5,915
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
(1,403
)
310
3,277
—
2,184
Comprehensive income
33,406
55,077
64,555
(114,738
)
38,300
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
(1,307
)
—
(1,307
)
Comprehensive income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders
$
33,406
$
55,077
$
63,248
$
(114,738
)
$
36,993
39
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, Inc.
(Issuer)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, L.P.
(Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Net income
$
62,683
$
110,795
$
124,509
$
(234,549
)
$
63,438
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized gains on marketable securities:
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period
—
22
83,814
—
83,836
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
—
41
2,424
—
2,465
Unrealized gains on marketable securities
—
63
86,238
—
86,301
Unrealized losses on interest rate swap agreements:
Unrealized interest rate swap losses arising during the period
(4,238
)
—
—
—
(4,238
)
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of interest income included in net income
1,215
—
—
—
1,215
Unrealized losses on interest rate swap agreements
(3,023
)
—
—
—
(3,023
)
Unrealized losses on foreign currency translation:
Unrealized foreign currency translation losses during the period
—
—
(7,778
)
—
(7,778
)
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
—
—
9,236
—
9,236
Unrealized losses on foreign currency translation
—
—
1,458
—
1,458
Total other comprehensive (loss) income
(3,023
)
63
87,696
—
84,736
Comprehensive income
59,660
110,858
212,205
(234,549
)
148,174
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
(883
)
—
(883
)
Comprehensive income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders
$
59,660
$
110,858
$
211,322
$
(234,549
)
$
147,291
40
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Income
for the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, Inc.
(Issuer)
Alexandria
Real Estate
Equities, L.P.
(Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Net income
$
74,363
$
113,073
$
126,126
$
(236,697
)
$
76,865
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gains on marketable securities:
Unrealized holding gains arising during the year
—
310
15,735
—
16,045
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income
—
—
406
—
406
Unrealized gains on marketable securities
—
310
16,141
—
16,451
Unrealized gains on interest rate swap agreements:
Unrealized interest rate swap losses arising during the year
(3,914
)
—
—
—
(3,914
)
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of interest expense included in net income
4,613
—
—
—
4,613
Unrealized gains on interest rate swap agreements
699
—
—
—
699
Unrealized foreign currency translation gains
—
—
2,809
—
2,809
Total other comprehensive income
699
310
18,950
—
19,959
Comprehensive income
75,062
113,383
145,076
(236,697
)
96,824
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
—
(2,502
)
—
(2,502
)
Comprehensive income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders
$
75,062
$
113,383
$
142,574
$
(236,697
)
$
94,322
41
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
for the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria Real
Estate Equities,
Inc. (Issuer)
Alexandria Real
Estate Equities,
L.P. (Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Operating Activities
Net income
$
62,683
$
110,795
$
124,509
$
(234,549
)
$
63,438
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
2,716
—
118,375
—
121,091
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
189
—
—
—
189
Impairment of real estate
—
—
14,510
—
14,510
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
—
—
(1,115
)
—
(1,115
)
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
—
—
648
—
648
Amortization of loan fees
3,852
—
1,871
—
5,723
Amortization of debt discounts (premiums)
161
—
(343
)
—
(182
)
Amortization of acquired below-market leases
—
—
(1,939
)
—
(1,939
)
Deferred rent
—
—
(23,193
)
—
(23,193
)
Stock compensation expense
7,744
—
—
—
7,744
Equity in earnings of affiliates
(121,526
)
(110,836
)
(2,187
)
234,549
—
Investment gains
—
—
(13,710
)
—
(13,710
)
Investment losses
—
41
7,836
—
7,877
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash
(7
)
—
117
—
110
Tenant receivables
—
—
1,243
—
1,243
Deferred leasing costs
—
—
(24,503
)
—
(24,503
)
Other assets
(6,208
)
—
1,287
—
(4,921
)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits
10,367
—
(11,977
)
—
(1,610
)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
(40,029
)
—
191,429
—
151,400
Investing Activities
Proceeds from sale of real estate
—
—
92,455
—
92,455
Additions to real estate
—
—
(226,302
)
—
(226,302
)
Purchase of real estate
—
—
(137,493
)
—
(137,493
)
Deposits for investing activities
—
—
(15,501
)
—
(15,501
)
Investment in unconsolidated real estate entities
—
—
(3,182
)
—
(3,182
)
Investments in subsidiaries
(199,541
)
(82,309
)
(1,711
)
283,561
—
Additions to investments
—
—
(52,738
)
—
(52,738
)
Sales of investments
—
6
22,468
—
22,474
Repayment of notes receivable
—
—
4,247
—
4,247
Net cash used in investing activities
$
(199,541
)
$
(82,303
)
$
(317,757
)
$
283,561
$
(316,040
)
42
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (continued)
for the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria Real
Estate Equities,
Inc. (Issuer)
Alexandria Real
Estate Equities,
L.P. (Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Financing Activities
Borrowings from secured notes payable
$
—
$
—
$
42,867
$
—
$
42,867
Repayments of borrowings from secured notes payable
—
—
(10,075
)
—
(10,075
)
Borrowings from unsecured senior line of credit
915,000
—
—
—
915,000
Repayments of borrowings from unsecured senior line of credit
(595,000
)
—
—
—
(595,000
)
Repayments of borrowings from unsecured senior bank term loans
(25,000
)
—
—
—
(25,000
)
Transfer to/from parent company
43,457
82,240
157,864
(283,561
)
—
Change in restricted cash related to financing activities
—
—
(1,520
)
—
(1,520
)
Loan fees
(2,104
)
—
(1,455
)
—
(3,559
)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
5,052
—
—
—
5,052
Dividends on common stock
(106,603
)
—
—
—
(106,603
)
Dividends on preferred stock
(12,493
)
—
—
—
(12,493
)
Contributions by noncontrolling interests
—
—
340
—
340
Distributions to and purchases of noncontrolling interests
—
—
(61,890
)
—
(61,890
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
222,309
82,240
126,131
(283,561
)
147,119
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
—
—
127
—
127
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(17,261
)
(63
)
(70
)
—
(17,394
)
Cash and cash equivalents as of the beginning of period
52,491
63
33,457
—
86,011
Cash and cash equivalents as of the end of period
$
35,230
$
—
$
33,387
$
—
$
68,617
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for interest, net of interest capitalized
$
33,695
$
—
$
10,637
$
—
$
44,332
Non-Cash Investing Activities
Change in accrued construction
$
—
$
—
$
(27,469
)
$
—
$
(27,469
)
Assumption of secured notes payable in connection with purchase of properties
$
—
$
—
$
(82,000
)
$
—
$
(82,000
)
Non-Cash Financing Activities
Payable for purchase of noncontrolling interest
$
(52,672
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(52,672
)
43
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
for the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria Real
Estate Equities,
Inc. (Issuer)
Alexandria Real
Estate Equities,
L.P. (Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Operating Activities
Net income
$
74,363
$
113,073
$
126,126
$
(236,697
)
$
76,865
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
2,927
—
104,808
—
107,735
Gain on sale of land parcel
—
—
(797
)
—
(797
)
Amortization of loan fees
3,542
—
1,762
—
5,304
Amortization of debt discounts
80
—
56
—
136
Amortization of acquired below-market leases
—
—
(1,434
)
—
(1,434
)
Deferred rent
—
—
(24,619
)
—
(24,619
)
Stock compensation expense
6,304
—
—
—
6,304
Equity in earnings of affiliates
(119,860
)
(114,608
)
(2,229
)
236,697
—
Investment gains
—
—
(6,225
)
—
(6,225
)
Investment losses
—
1,535
3,705
—
5,240
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash
(9
)
—
9
—
—
Tenant receivables
—
—
(735
)
—
(735
)
Deferred leasing costs
—
—
(17,452
)
—
(17,452
)
Other assets
(4,264
)
—
(1,652
)
—
(5,916
)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and tenant security deposits
20,850
—
(20,765
)
—
85
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
(16,067
)
—
160,558
—
144,491
Investing Activities
Proceeds from sale of properties
—
—
17,868
—
17,868
Additions to real estate
—
—
(210,792
)
—
(210,792
)
Purchase of real estate
—
—
(97,785
)
—
(97,785
)
Change in restricted cash related to construction projects
—
—
5,650
—
5,650
Investment in unconsolidated joint venture
—
—
(1,405
)
—
(1,405
)
Investments in subsidiaries
(235,931
)
(205,546
)
(8,095
)
449,572
—
Additions to investments
—
—
(25,358
)
—
(25,358
)
Sales of investments
—
—
8,794
—
8,794
Proceeds from repayment of note receivable
—
—
29,851
—
29,851
Net cash used in investing activities
$
(235,931
)
$
(205,546
)
$
(281,272
)
$
449,572
$
(273,177
)
44
14.
Condensed consolidating financial information (continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows (continued)
for the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Alexandria Real
Estate Equities,
Inc. (Issuer)
Alexandria Real
Estate Equities,
L.P. (Guarantor
Subsidiary)
Combined
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
Financing Activities
Borrowings from secured notes payable
$
—
$
—
$
77,762
$
—
$
77,762
Repayments of borrowings from secured notes payable
—
—
(219,427
)
—
(219,427
)
Borrowings from unsecured senior line of credit
637,000
—
—
—
637,000
Repayments of borrowings from unsecured senior line of credit
(270,000
)
—
—
—
(270,000
)
Transfer to/from parent company
103
205,546
243,923
(449,572
)
—
Change in restricted cash related to financing activities
—
—
1,212
—
1,212
Loan fees
(44
)
—
(266
)
—
(310
)
Dividends on common stock
(98,867
)
—
—
—
(98,867
)
Dividends on preferred stock
(12,943
)
—
—
—
(12,943
)
Contributions by noncontrolling interests
—
—
19,410
—
19,410
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
—
—
(1,983
)
—
(1,983
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
255,249
205,546
120,631
(449,572
)
131,854
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
—
—
837
—
837
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
3,251
—
754
—
4,005
Cash and cash equivalents as of the beginning of period
14,790
—
42,906
—
57,696
Cash and cash equivalents as of the end of period
$
18,041
$
—
$
43,660
$
—
$
61,701
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for interest, net of interest capitalized
$
22,218
$
—
$
9,704
$
—
$
31,922
Non-Cash Investing Activities
Change in accrued construction
$
—
$
—
$
592
$
—
$
592
Assumption of secured notes payable in connection with purchase of properties
$
—
$
—
$
(48,329
)
$
—
$
(48,329
)
45
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Certain information and statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements containing the words “forecast,” “guidance,” “projects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “seeks,” “should,” or “will,” or the negative of these words or similar words, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties regarding events, conditions, and financial trends that may affect our future plans of operations, business strategy, results of operations, and financial position. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those included within or contemplated by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following:
•
Operating factors such as a failure to operate our business successfully in comparison to market expectations or in comparison to our competitors, our inability to obtain capital when desired or refinance debt maturities when desired, and/or a failure to maintain our status as a REIT for federal tax purposes.
•
Market and industry factors such as adverse developments concerning the science and technology industries and/or our client tenants.
•
Government factors such as any unfavorable effects resulting from federal, state, local, and/or foreign government policies, laws, and/or funding levels.
•
Global factors such as negative economic, political, financial, credit market, and/or banking conditions.
•
Other factors such as climate change, cyber intrusions, and/or changes in laws, regulations, and financial accounting standards.
This list of risks and uncertainties is not exhaustive. Additional information regarding risk factors that may affect us is included under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2014
. Readers of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should also read our other documents filed publicly with the SEC for further discussion regarding such factors.
46
Overview
We are a Maryland corporation formed in October 1994 that has elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
We are the largest and leading office REIT uniquely focused on collaborative science and technology campuses in urban innovation clusters with a total market capitalization of
$10.7 billion
as of
June 30, 2015
, and an asset base of
31.1 million
square feet, including
18.8 million
RSF of operating and current value-creation projects, as well as an additional
12.3 million
square feet of near-term and future ground-up development projects. Alexandria pioneered this niche in 1994 and has since established a dominant market presence in AAA locations, including Greater Boston, San Francisco, New York City, San Diego, Seattle, Maryland, and Research Triangle Park. Alexandria is known for its high-quality and diverse client tenant base, with approximately
53%
of total annualized base rent as of
June 30, 2015
, generated from investment-grade client tenants – a REIT industry-leading percentage. Alexandria has a longstanding and proven track record of developing Class A assets clustered in urban science and technology campuses that provide its innovative client tenants with highly dynamic and collaborative environments that enhance their ability to successfully recruit and retain world-class talent and inspire productivity, efficiency, creativity, and success. We believe these advantages result in higher occupancy levels, longer lease terms, higher rental income, higher returns, and greater long-term asset value.
Our primary business objective is to maximize stockholder value by providing our stockholders with the greatest possible total return and long-term asset value based on a multifaceted platform of internal and external growth. A key element of our strategy is our unique focus on Class A assets clustered in urban campuses. These key urban campus locations are characterized by high barriers to entry for new landlords, and a limited supply of available space. They represent highly desirable locations for tenancy by science and technology entities because of their close proximity to concentrations of specialized skills, knowledge, institutions, and related businesses. Our strategy also includes drawing upon our deep and broad real estate, science, and technology relationships in order to identify and attract new and leading client tenants and to source additional value-creation real estate opportunities.
Executive summary
Our first-in-class team executed another strong quarter of financial and operating results, including the following key highlights:
•
Executed agreement for the sale of a
70%
interest in our Class A facility located at 225 Binney Street, Cambridge, MA, to TIAA-CREF for a sale price of
$190.1 million
at a cash cap rate of
4.5%
; we expect to complete the sale in the fourth quarter of 2015;
•
2015 recipient of the NAREIT Investor CARE (Communication and Reporting Excellence) Gold Award by NAREIT as a best-in-class REIT that delivers transparency, quality, and efficient communications and reporting to the investment community;
•
FFO per share - diluted for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, of
$1.31
, up
10.1%
, compared to
$1.19
for the
three months ended June 30, 2014
;
•
Same property NOI growth of
0.5%
and
4.7%
(cash basis) for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, as compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2014
;
•
Rental rate increases of
14.5%
and
7.0%
(cash basis) for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
; on lease renewals and re-leasing of space aggregating
783,042
RSF;
•
Executed
1.9 million
RSF of leasing during the
three months ended June 30, 2015
; strong demand and pricing power in our key cluster markets;
•
Executed
1.1 million
RSF (included in the
1.9 million
RSF above) of leases related to Class A ground-up development space providing further visibility into key near-term multi-year growth drivers; further increasing proportion of total ABR in the future from Class A assets and high-quality tenants; and
•
Common stock dividend for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, of
$0.77
per common share, up
5 cent
s, or
7%
, over the
three months ended June 30, 2014
; continuation of strategy to share growth in cash flows from operating activities with our shareholders while also retaining important capital for investment.
47
4.5% Cash cap rate on sale of 70% interest in core real estate asset
•
In
July 2015
, we executed an agreement for the sale of a
70%
interest in our Class A facility located at 225 Binney Street, Cambridge, MA, to TIAA-CREF for a sale price of
$190.1 million
at a cash cap rate of
4.5%
; we expect to complete the sale in the fourth quarter of 2015
2015 Recipient of NAREIT Investor CARE Award
•
2015 recipient of the Investor CARE (Communication and Reporting Excellence) Gold Award by NAREIT as a best-in-class REIT that delivers transparency, quality, and efficient communications and reporting to the investment community
Results
•
FFO attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – basic and diluted:
•
$1.31
per share for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, up
10.1%
, compared to
$1.19
per share for the
three months ended June 30, 2014
•
$2.59
per share for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, up
9.7%
, compared to
$2.36
per share for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
•
$93.4 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, up
$8.9 million
, or
10.6%
, compared to
$84.5 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2014
•
$184.8 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, up
$17.2 million
, or
10.3%
, compared to
$167.6 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
•
Net income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – diluted:
•
$31.3 million
, or
$0.44
per share, for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, compared to
$27.9 million
, or
$0.39
per share, for the
three months ended June 30, 2014
•
$49.1 million
, or
$0.69
per share, for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, compared to
$60.6 million
, or
$0.85
per share, for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
Core operating metrics
•
Total revenues:
•
$204.2 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, up
$27.8 million
, or
15.7%
, compared to
$176.4 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2014
•
$400.9 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, up
$48.3 million
, or
13.7%
, compared to
$352.6 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
•
NOI, including our share of unconsolidated joint ventures:
•
$142.8 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, up
$18.8 million
, or
15.1%
, compared to
$124.0 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2014
•
$279.2 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, up
$31.5 million
, or
12.7%
, compared to
$247.7 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
•
Same property NOI growth:
•
0.5%
and
4.7%
(cash basis) increase for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, as compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2014
•
1.4%
and
6.2%
(cash basis) increase for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, as compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2014
•
Executed leas
es for
1,915,379
RSF during the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, the highest quarterly leasing volume in the Company’s history, including:
•
304,326
RSF to
Eli Lilly and Company
, representing
100%
of the recently acquired redevelopment project at
10290 Campus Point Drive in our University Town Center submarket in San Diego
•
300,000
RSF to
Stripe, Inc.
, representing
100%
of 510 Townsend Street in our SoMa submarket in San Francisco
•
208,394
RSF to
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
, representing
48%
of 100 Binney Street in our Cambridge submar
ket in Greater Boston
•
90,423
RSF to
Juno Therapeutics, Inc.
, representing
31%
of 400 Dexter Avenue North in our Lake Union submarket in Seattle
48
•
14.5%
and
7.0%
(cash basis) rental rate increases on lease renewals and re-leasing of space aggregating
783,042
RSF
•
Executed leases for
2,938,048
RSF during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
:
•
20.3%
and
11.2%
(cash basis) rental rate increases on lease renewals and re-leasing of space aggregating
1,272,328
RSF
•
Occupancy at 95.9% for propertie
s in North America as of
June 30, 2015
•
Operating margins at
70%
for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
•
Adjusted EBITDA margins at
65%
for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
External growth: value-creation projects and acquisitions
Value-creation projects
•
Current development projects underway were on average
88%
leased or under negotiation (
71%
leased and
17%
under negotiation)
•
Near-term value-creation projects with estimated commencement of construction during the six months ending December 31, 2015, aggregating
1,097,564
RSF, were on average
100%
leased or under negotiation (
80%
leased and
20%
under negotiation)
•
Key value-creation projects placed into service during the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, include:
•
112,500
RSF to
FORUM Pharmaceuticals Inc.
at 225 Second Avenue in our Route 128 submarket in Greater Boston
•
51,997
RSF, including
48,990
RSF to the
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.
at 360 Longwood Avenue in our Longwood Medical submarket in Greater Boston
•
Commencements of development project during the
three months ended June 30, 2015
:
•
287,806
RSF development project at 400 Dexter Avenue North in our Lake Union submarket in Seattle;
64%
leased/negotiating (
31%
leased and
33%
under negotiation)
Acquisitions
•
In
April 2015
, we acquired 505 Brannan Street, a near-term development project in our SoMa submarket. The property is currently entitled for
135,000
RSF, and we are seeking entitlements for an additional
165,000
RSF. The purchase price of the land parcel was
$34.0 million
.
•
Refer to “Subsequent Events” section below for details on our acquisition of 10290 Campus Point Drive in our University Town Center submarket
Balance sheet
•
$10.7 billion
total market capitalization as of
June 30, 2015
•
12%
of gross investment in real estate in value-creation pipeline (50% of pipeline undergoing construction)
•
7.5 times
net debt to Adjusted EBITDA – second quarter of 2015 annualized; the 2015 target range from 6.5 times to 7.5 times, with goal of less than 7.0 times by the fourth quarter of 2015
•
3.4 times
fixed-charge coverage ratio – second quarter of 2015 annualized
•
In June 2015, we completed a partial principal repayment of
$25.0 million
, extended the maturity date of the remaining $350 million unsecured senior bank term loan from 2016 to 2021, and reduced pricing to LIBOR+1.10% from LIBOR+1.20%
•
In June 2015, we exercised the first of two, one-year extensions on a
$47.2 million
secured construction loan, which extended the maturity date from July 1, 2015, to July 1, 2016
•
Limited debt maturities through 2018; well-laddered maturity profile
•
Executed additional interest rate swap agreements in April, June, and July 2015, with an aggregate notional amount of
$550 million
, to increase notional hedged variable-rate debt to a minimum of
$800 million
and
$350 million
during 2016 and 2017, respectively
•
22%
unhedged variable-rate debt as a percentage of total debt as of
June 30, 2015
, with goal of less than 15% by
December 31, 2015
49
LEED statistics
•
51
LEED projects, including
35
LEED certified projects aggregating
5.4 million
RSF and
16
additional LEED projects in process aggregating
3.3 million
square feet
•
55%
of our total annualized base rent will be generated from LEED projects upon completion of our in-process projects
Subsequent events
•
In July 2015, we commenced development of a
431,483
RSF value-creation project at 100 Binney Street in our Cambridge submarket;
98%
leased/negotiating, including
48%
leased to
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
.
•
In July 2015, we acquired 10290 Campus Point Drive, a property aggregating
304,326
RSF. This highly strategic acquisition is located adjacent to our uniquely positioned life science campus at the Alexandria Center
®
for Life Science at Campus Pointe with high-quality on-site amenities in the heart of our University Town Center submarket. The acquired property is
100%
leased to the previous owner through September 30, 2015. In June 2015, we leased the entire
304,326
RSF to Eli Lilly and Company for
15.5 years
. In October 2015, we expect to commence conversion of the space into Class A office/laboratory space through redevelopment. Upon completion of this redevelopment project, Eli Lilly and Company will relocate its existing presence at 10300 Campus Point Drive of
125,409
RSF and the previously announced
106,173
RSF expansion, into our recently acquired 10290 Campus Point Drive. These changes resulted in a net increase of
72,744
RSF leased to Eli Lilly and Company at the campus. Our campus will ultimately contain an aggregate of
1,046,472
RSF, including
292,387
RSF of capacity for future ground-up development.
50
Operating summary
Core operations
The following table presents information regarding our asset base as of
June 30, 2015
, and
December 31, 2014
:
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
(Rentable square feet)
Operating properties
16,822,194
16,727,985
Development properties
1,995,729
1,857,520
Redevelopment properties
—
143,777
RSF of total properties
18,817,923
18,729,282
Number of properties
194
193
Occupancy in North America at period-end – operating
95.9
%
97.0
%
Occupancy in North America at period-end – operating and redevelopment
95.9
%
96.1
%
Annualized base rent per occupied RSF at period-end
$
38.70
$
37.23
Leasing
•
Executed a total of
132
leases, with a weighted-average lease term of
9.1 years
, for
2,938,048
RSF, including
1,513,159
RSF related to our development or redevelopment projects during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
.
•
Achieved rental rate increases for renewed/re-leased space of
20.3%
and
11.2%
(cash basis) on
1,272,328
RSF during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
.
•
Occupancy rate for operating properties in North America of
95.9%
as of June 30, 2015
.
Approximately
67%
of the
132
leases executed during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, did not include concessions for free rent. Tenant concessions/free rent averaged approximately
2.6
months with respect to the
2,938,048
RSF leased during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
.
51
The following table summarizes our leasing activity at our properties:
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2015
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2015
Year Ended
December 31, 2014
Including
Straight-line Rent
Cash Basis
Including
Straight-line Rent
Cash Basis
Including
Straight-line Rent
Cash Basis
(Dollars are per RSF)
Leasing activity:
Renewed/re-leased space
(1)
Rental rate changes
14.5%
7.0%
20.3%
11.2%
13.3%
5.4%
New rates
$
36.35
$
36.57
$
36.60
$
36.99
$
40.32
$
40.73
Expiring rates
$
31.76
$
34.17
$
30.42
$
33.25
$
35.60
$
38.63
Rentable square footage
783,042
1,272,328
1,447,516
Number of leases
57
92
124
Tenant improvements/leasing commissions per square foot
$
7.95
$
9.59
$
10.49
Average lease terms
5.1 years
4.7 years
3.5 years
Developed/redeveloped/previously vacant space leased
New rates
$
61.07
$
54.55
$
56.85
$
50.90
$
40.62
$
36.50
Rentable square footage
1,132,337
1,665,720
1,321,317
Number of leases
23
40
66
Tenant improvements/leasing commissions per square foot
$
15.20
$
16.47
$
14.96
Average lease terms
12.5 years
12.4 years
11.5 years
Leasing activity summary (totals):
New rates
$
50.97
$
47.20
$
48.08
$
44.88
$
40.46
$
38.71
Rentable square footage
1,915,379
2,938,048
(2)
2,768,833
Number of leases
80
132
190
Tenant improvements/leasing commissions per square foot
$
12.24
$
13.49
$
12.62
Average lease terms
9.5 years
9.1 years
7.3 years
Lease expirations
(1)
Expiring rates
$
30.06
$
31.77
$
29.39
$
31.88
$
33.09
$
35.79
Rentable square footage
1,010,951
1,627,479
1,733,614
Number of leases
69
116
151
(1)
Excludes
20
month-to-month leases for
32,498
RSF and
43,672
RSF as of
June 30, 2015
, and December 31, 2014, respectively.
(2)
During the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, we granted tenant concessions/free rent averaging
2.6
months with respect to the
2,938,048
RSF leased.
52
Summary of lease expirations
The following table summarizes information with respect to the lease expirations at our properties as of
June 30, 2015
:
Year of Lease Expiration
Number of Leases Expiring
RSF of Expiring Leases
Percentage of
Aggregate Total RSF
ABR of
Expiring Leases (per RSF)
2015
33
(1)
466,006
(1)
2.8
%
$
27.79
2016
88
1,382,244
8.2
%
$
31.59
2017
84
1,542,984
9.2
%
$
27.46
2018
82
1,742,989
10.4
%
$
39.06
2019
62
1,345,086
8.0
%
$
35.77
2020
57
1,482,844
8.8
%
$
36.35
2021
39
1,306,329
7.8
%
$
38.84
2022
26
896,973
5.3
%
$
34.31
2023
22
1,188,496
7.1
%
$
37.63
2024
15
794,391
4.7
%
$
45.09
Thereafter
44
3,498,160
20.8
%
$
47.88
(1)
Excludes
20
month-to-month leases for
32,498
RSF.
The following tables present information by market with respect to our lease expirations as of
June 30, 2015
, for the remainder of 2015 and all of 2016:
2015 RSF of Expiring Leases
ABR of
Expiring Leases
(per RSF)
Leased
Negotiating/
Anticipating
Targeted for
Redevelopment
Remaining
Expiring Leases
Total
(1)
Market
Greater Boston
14,460
8,023
—
32,211
54,694
$
40.18
San Francisco
114,769
8,878
—
—
123,647
38.06
New York City
—
—
—
9,727
9,727
N/A
San Diego
—
—
182,611
(2)
1,000
183,611
15.77
Seattle
—
—
—
39,578
39,578
22.93
Maryland
17,369
—
—
24,939
42,308
11.24
Research Triangle Park
4,575
—
—
443
5,018
N/A
Non-cluster markets
—
—
—
5,647
5,647
N/A
Asia
—
—
—
1,776
1,776
16.20
Total
151,173
16,901
182,611
115,321
466,006
$
27.79
Percentage of expiring leases
32
%
4
%
39
%
25
%
100
%
2016 RSF of Expiring Leases
ABR of
Expiring Leases
(per RSF)
Leased
Negotiating/
Anticipating
Targeted for
Redevelopment
Remaining
Expiring Leases
Total
Market
Greater Boston
34,676
62,073
—
129,002
225,751
$
44.66
San Francisco
6,233
13,589
—
143,320
163,142
30.69
New York City
—
—
—
5,447
5,447
N/A
San Diego
—
—
—
525,658
(3)
525,658
32.86
Seattle
2,468
—
—
44,188
46,656
34.33
Maryland
12,103
4,457
—
106,403
122,963
26.73
Research Triangle Park
32,008
—
—
110,336
142,344
23.15
Canada
60,917
—
—
—
60,917
24.35
Non-cluster markets
—
—
—
3,854
3,854
N/A
Asia
—
81,170
—
4,342
85,512
16.48
Total
148,405
161,289
—
1,072,550
1,382,244
$
31.59
Percentage of expiring leases
11
%
12
%
—
%
77
%
100
%
(1)
Excludes
20
month-to-month leases for
32,498
RSF.
(2)
Comprises
133,731
RSF at 9625 Towne Centre Drive and
48,880
RSF at 10151 Barnes Canyon Road, which were acquired with the intent to redevelop them into tech office spaces in the third quarter of 2015 and the fourth quarter of 2015, respectively, upon expiration of the acquired in-place leases.
(3)
Includes 125,409 RSF leased to Eli Lilly and Company at 10300 Campus Point Drive with a contractual expiration in the fourth quarter of 2016. This tenant will relocate and expand into
304,326
RSF at our recently acquired redevelopment project at 10290 Campus Point Drive.
53
Location of properties
The locations of our properties are diversified among a number of science and technology cluster markets. The following table sets forth, as of
June 30, 2015
, the total RSF, number of properties, and annualized base rent of our properties in each of our existing markets (dollars in thousands):
RSF
Number of Properties
Annualized Base Rent
ABR
Market
Operating
Development
Total
% Total
per RSF
(1)
Greater Boston
4,483,924
734,385
5,218,309
28
%
42
$
214,065
36
%
$
49.50
San Francisco
2,712,903
422,980
3,135,883
17
27
116,944
19
43.11
New York City
682,427
130,402
812,829
4
4
52,963
9
77.92
San Diego
3,197,821
358,609
3,556,430
19
49
100,950
17
33.41
Seattle
746,260
287,806
1,034,066
5
11
30,305
5
42.32
Maryland
2,156,196
—
2,156,196
11
29
49,257
8
24.40
Research Triangle Park
980,763
61,547
1,042,310
6
15
19,332
3
21.65
Canada
322,967
—
322,967
2
4
8,156
1
25.43
Non-cluster markets
105,033
—
105,033
1
3
1,347
—
18.87
North America
15,388,294
1,995,729
17,384,023
93
184
593,319
98
40.20
Asia
1,199,714
—
1,199,714
6
8
6,863
1
9.66
Subtotal
16,588,008
1,995,729
18,583,737
99
192
600,182
99
38.80
Properties “held for sale”
(2)
234,186
—
234,186
1
2
6,668
1
31.72
Total
16,822,194
1,995,729
18,817,923
100
%
194
$
606,850
100
%
$
38.70
(1)
Represents ABR per occupied RSF as of
June 30, 2015
.
(2)
Refer to Note 12 – “Assets Classified as Held-for-Sale” for additional information regarding properties classified as “held for sale” as of
June 30, 2015
.
ABR from Class A Assets in AAA Locations
75%
of ARE’s
Total ABR
Summary of occupancy percentages in North America
The following table sets forth the occupancy percentages for our operating assets and our assets under redevelopment in each of our North America markets as of the following dates:
Operating Properties
Operating and Redevelopment Properties
Market
6/30/15
3/31/15
6/30/14
6/30/15
(1)
3/31/15
6/30/14
Greater Boston
96.5
%
(2)
98.9
%
98.5
%
96.5
%
96.4
%
95.5
%
San Francisco
100.0
98.5
98.4
100.0
98.5
98.4
New York City
99.6
99.5
98.4
99.6
99.5
98.4
San Diego
94.5
94.9
97.2
94.5
93.9
94.4
Seattle
96.0
96.2
93.3
96.0
96.2
93.3
Maryland
93.6
93.2
92.7
93.6
93.2
92.7
Research Triangle Park
91.0
(3)
98.8
99.5
91.0
98.8
99.5
Subtotal
96.0
(4)
97.0
97.1
96.0
96.1
95.7
Canada
99.3
99.0
97.6
99.3
99.0
97.6
Non-cluster markets
68.0
68.0
74.9
68.0
68.0
74.9
North America
95.9
%
(4)
96.8
%
96.9
%
95.9
%
95.9
%
95.6
%
(1)
There were no properties undergoing redevelopment as of
June 30, 2015
.
(2)
Consistent with our prior disclosures, the decline from March 31, 2015, is primarily driven by a 128,325 RSF full-building lease that expired at 19 Presidential Way in our Route 128 submarket. We are in the process of marketing the property for multi-tenancy office/laboratory use.
(3)
Consistent with our prior disclosures, the decline from March 31, 2015, is primarily driven by an 81,580 RSF full-building lease that expired at 2525 East NC Highway 54 in our Research Triangle Park market. We are in the process of marketing the property for multi-tenancy office/laboratory use.
(4)
See footnotes 2 and 3 above.
54
Client tenants
Our properties are leased to a high-quality and diverse group of client tenants, with no individual client tenant accounting for more than
5.6%
of our annualized base rent. The following table sets forth information regarding leases with our 20 largest client tenants based upon annualized base rent as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
Remaining Lease Term in Years
(1)
Aggregate RSF
ABR
Percentage of Aggregate ABR
Investment-Grade Ratings
Client Tenant
Fitch
Moody’s
S&P
1
Novartis AG
2.5
697,814
$
33,890
5.6
%
AA
Aa3
AA-
2
ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
14.8
386,111
29,994
4.9
—
—
—
3
Illumina, Inc.
14.7
595,886
25,452
4.2
—
—
BBB
4
New York University
15.3
209,224
19,897
3.3
—
Aa3
AA-
5
Roche
5.2
343,472
16,490
2.7
AA
A1
AA
6
Eli Lilly and Company
7.1
257,119
16,144
2.7
A
A2
AA-
7
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc.
15.0
203,090
15,038
2.5
—
A1
—
8
United States Government
9.9
263,147
14,769
2.4
AAA
Aaa
AA+
9
Amgen Inc.
8.3
401,623
14,278
2.4
BBB
Baa1
A
10
FibroGen, Inc.
8.4
234,249
14,278
2.4
—
—
—
11
Biogen Inc.
12.9
313,872
13,735
2.3
—
Baa1
A-
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
4.4
208,274
10,971
1.8
—
Aaa
AAA
13
The Regents of the University of California
8.3
230,633
10,354
1.7
AA
Aa2
AA
14
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
3.7
251,316
10,175
1.7
A-
A2
A+
15
Celgene Corporation
6.1
273,086
10,093
1.7
—
Baa1
BBB+
16
The Scripps Research Institute
2.6
218,031
10,023
1.7
AA-
Aa3
—
17
GlaxoSmithKline plc
4.0
208,394
9,571
1.6
A+
A2
A+
18
Sanofi
6.1
179,697
8,001
1.3
AA-
A1
AA
19
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
6.3
129,424
7,314
1.2
—
—
—
20
Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.
7.8
106,232
6,441
1.1
—
—
—
Total/weighted-average
8.9
5,710,694
$
296,908
49.2
%
(1)
Based on percentage of aggregate annualized base rent in effect
as of June 30, 2015
.
The following chart sets forth information regarding client tenant mix by annualized base rent
as of June 30, 2015
:
Investment-Grade
Client Tenants:
53%
of ARE’s
Total ABR
55
Value-creation projects and external growth
Key real estate metrics
2015 Disciplined Allocation of Capital
(1)
12% of Gross Investment in Real Estate in Value-Creation Pipeline
LEED-Certified Percentage of ABR
(2)
Pre-Leased
(3)
Percentage of Ground-Up Developments Since January 1, 2009
Single-Tenant
100%
Pre-leased
2.0M RSF
Multi-Tenant
36%
Pre-leased
2.1M RSF
(1)
Includes actual and projected construction and acquisitions for the year ending December 31, 2015. Refer to page
63
and page
64
for additional details.
(2)
Upon completion of our in-process LEED certification projects.
(3)
Represents average pre-leased percentage at the time development commenced.
56
Investments in real estate
Our investments in real estate consisted of the following as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands, except per square foot amounts):
Investments in Real Estate
Consolidated
ARE
Share of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
(1)
Total
Square Feet
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Per SF
(2)
Page
Amount
%
Consolidated
Total
Rental properties
54
$
7,608,220
$
57,254
$
7,665,474
88
%
16,612,566
209,628
16,822,194
$
463
Current value-creation projects/
Construction in progress (CIP):
59
Current development projects
60
,
61
409,619
105,870
515,489
6
%
1,368,841
626,888
1,995,729
341
Rental properties and current value-creation projects
8,017,839
163,124
8,180,963
17,981,407
836,516
18,817,923
450
Near-term value-creation projects (CIP)
59
,
62
246,111
—
246,111
3
%
2,026,669
—
2,026,669
121
Future value-creation projects:
North America
62
183,984
—
183,984
2
%
3,807,375
—
3,807,375
48
Asia
70
78,911
—
78,911
1
%
6,419,707
—
6,419,707
12
262,895
—
262,895
10,227,082
—
10,227,082
26
Near-term and future value-creation projects
509,006
—
509,006
12,253,751
—
12,253,751
42
Value-creation pipeline
918,625
105,870
1,024,495
12
%
13,622,592
626,888
14,249,480
84
Gross investments in real estate
8,526,845
163,124
$
8,689,969
100
%
30,235,158
836,516
31,071,674
$
289
Equity method of accounting – unconsolidated joint ventures
68
121,055
N/A
Gross investments in real estate – incl. unconsol. joint ventures
69
8,647,900
N/A
Less: accumulated depreciation
(1,205,025
)
(874
)
Investments in real estate
$
7,442,875
$
162,250
(1)
We believe the information on our share of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures is useful information for investors as it provides our proportional share of the investments in real estate from all properties. This information also allows investors to estimate the impact of real estate investments at the joint venture level.
(2)
Items that include our share of unconsolidated joint ventures are not calculated directly from amounts shown on this page. The per square foot amount represents the total cost of our rental properties and value-creation projects, including our partners’ share, divided by the total rentable or developable square feet of the respective property.
57
Development, redevelopment, and future value-creation projects
A key component of our business model is our disciplined allocation of capital to Class A development and redevelopment projects located in highly dynamic and collaborative campuses in key coastal gateway cities that inspire science and technology innovation. These projects are focused on providing high-quality, generic, and reusable space to meet the real estate requirements of, and that are reusable by, a wide range of client tenants. During the period of construction, these assets are non-income-producing assets. A significant number of our active development and redevelopment projects are leased and expected to be substantially placed into service in the near term. Upon completion, each value-creation project is expected to generate significant revenues and cash flows. Our development and redevelopment projects are generally in locations that are highly desirable to high-quality science and technology entities, which we believe results in higher occupancy levels, longer lease terms, and higher rental income and returns.
Development projects consist of the ground-up development of generic and reusable facilities. Redevelopment projects consist of the permanent change in use of office, warehouse, and shell space into office/laboratory or tech office space. We generally will not commence new development projects for aboveground construction of Class A office/laboratory or tech office space without first securing significant pre-leasing for such space, except when there is solid market demand for high-quality Class A facilities. Predevelopment activities include entitlements, permitting, design, site work, and other activities preceding commencement of construction of aboveground building improvements. The advancement of predevelopment efforts is focused on reducing the time required to deliver projects to prospective client tenants. These critical activities add significant value for future ground-up development and are required for the vertical construction of buildings. Ultimately, these projects will provide high-quality facilities and are expected to generate significant revenue and cash flows.
Our initial stabilized yield is calculated as the quotient of the estimated amounts of NOI upon stabilization and our investment in the property and excludes the impact of leverage. Our cash rents related to our value-creation projects are expected to increase over time, and our average cash yields are expected, in general, to be greater than our initial stabilized yields (cash basis). Our estimates for initial stabilized yields, initial stabilized yields (cash basis), and total costs at completion represent our initial estimates at the commencement of the project. We expect to update this information upon completion of the project, or sooner if there are significant changes to the expected project yields or costs. Initial stabilized yield reflects rental income, including contractual rent escalations and any rent concessions over the term
(s) of the lease(s), calculated on a straight-line basis. Initial stabilized yield (cash basis) reflects cash rents at the stabilization date after initial rental concessions, if any, have elapsed. Average cash yield reflects cash rents, including contractual rent escalations after initial rental concessions have elapsed, calculated on a straight-line basis. The stabilized occupancy date represents the estimated date on which the project is expected to reach occupancy of 95% or greater.
58
Overview of current and near-term value-creation pipeline
A substantial portion of our value-creation pipeline is expected to be placed into service in the near term. The completion of these highly-leased projects is expected to contribute additional operating cash flow and significant growth in NOI and EBITDA. The following table sets forth the expected year in which our current and near-term value-creation development projects are forecasted to contribute incremental NOI:
CIP
Square Feet
Total Project
Year of NOI Contribution – Forecast
Square
Feet
Leased
Negotiating
Leased/Negotiating
2015
2016
2017
2018 and Beyond
Property – Market/Submarket
Current value-creation development projects
360 Longwood Avenue – Greater Boston/Longwood Medical
203,908
413,536
63
%
—
%
63
%
430 East 29th Street – New York City/Manhattan
130,402
418,639
76
22
98
3013/3033 Science Park Road – San Diego/Torrey Pines
63,000
165,938
81
—
81
5200 Illumina Way–Bldg 6 – San Diego/University Town Center
295,609
295,609
100
—
100
6040 George Watts Hill Drive – Research Triangle Park/RTP
61,547
61,547
100
—
100
50/60 Binney Street – Greater Boston/Cambridge
530,477
530,477
50
48
98
1455/1515 Third Street – San Francisco/Mission Bay
422,980
422,980
100
—
100
400 Dexter Avenue North – Seattle/Lake Union
287,806
287,806
31
33
(1)
64
Total/weighted-average
1,995,729
2,596,532
71
%
17
%
88
%
Subsequent acquisitions of value-creation redevelopment projects
10290 Campus Point Drive – San Diego/University Town Center
304,326
304,326
100
%
—
%
100
%
Near-term value-creation development projects
(2)
4796 Executive Drive – San Diego/University Town Center
61,755
61,755
100
%
—
%
100
%
100 Binney Street – Greater Boston/Cambridge
431,483
431,483
48
50
98
510 Townsend Street – San Francisco/SoMa
300,000
300,000
100
—
100
505 Brannan Street – San Francisco/SoMa
135,000
135,000
—
—
—
5200 Illumina Way – San Diego/University Town Center
386,044
386,044
—
—
—
10300 Campus Point Drive–Bldg 2 – San Diego/University Town Center
292,387
292,387
—
—
—
East 29th Street – New York City/Manhattan
420,000
420,000
—
—
—
(3)
Total/weighted-average
2,026,669
2,026,669
28
%
11
%
39
%
(1) Includes expansion for 23,726 RSF currently under lease negotiation with Juno Therapeutics, Inc. Also, includes an option for Juno Therapeutics, Inc. to expand in the project by up to an additional 70,204 RSF.
(2) Refer to page
53
for RSF targeted for redevelopment.
(3) We hold an option to ground lease a parcel supporting the future ground-up development of approximately 420,000 SF at the Alexandria Center
®
for Life Science. We have begun discussions with the City of New York regarding this option and the potential to increase the site density beyond 420,000 SF.
59
Current value-creation development projects – consolidated
The following table sets forth our consolidated development projects as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
Leased Status
Project Start
Date
Initial Occupancy Date
Stabilized Occupancy Date
Project RSF
Leased
Negotiating
Total Leased/Negotiating
Property – Market/Submarket
In Service
CIP
Total
RSF
%
RSF
%
RSF
%
Consolidated development projects
50/60 Binney Street – Greater Boston/Cambridge
—
530,477
530,477
267,277
50
%
253,103
48
%
520,380
98
%
1Q15
3Q17
2017
430 East 29th Street – New York City/Manhattan
288,237
130,402
418,639
318,645
76
%
90,886
22
%
409,531
98
%
4Q12
4Q13
2015
5200 Illumina Way–Building 6 –
San Diego/University Town Center
—
295,609
295,609
295,609
100
%
—
—
%
295,609
100
%
3Q14
3Q16
2016
3013/3033 Science Park Road – San Diego/Torrey Pines
102,938
63,000
165,938
135,002
81
%
—
—
%
135,002
81
%
2Q14
4Q14
2016
400 Dexter Avenue North – Seattle/Lake Union
—
287,806
287,806
90,423
31
%
93,930
33
%
184,353
64
%
2Q15
1Q17
2018
6040 George Watts Hill Drive –
Research Triangle Park/Research Triangle Park
—
61,547
61,547
61,547
100
%
—
—
%
61,547
100
%
4Q14
1Q16
2016
Consolidated development projects
391,175
1,368,841
1,760,016
1,168,503
66
%
437,919
25
%
1,606,422
91
%
Investment
Unlevered
Property – Market/Submarket
Cost to Complete
Average Cash
Yield
Initial Stabilized Yield
(Cash Basis)
Initial Stabilized Yield
In Service
CIP
2015
Thereafter
Total at Completion
Consolidated development projects
50/60 Binney Street – Greater Boston/Cambridge
$
—
$
230,895
$
68,331
$
TBD
$
TBD
TBD
(1)
TBD
(1)
TBD
(1)
430 East 29th Street – New York City/Manhattan
$
313,574
$
122,687
$
26,984
$
—
$
463,245
7.1%
6.6%
6.5%
5200 Illumina Way–Building 6 –
San Diego/University Town Center
$
—
$
19,494
$
20,476
$
29,930
$
69,900
8.6%
7.0%
8.4%
3013/3033 Science Park Road – San Diego/Torrey Pines
$
53,669
$
5,464
$
13,366
$
32,291
$
104,790
7.7%
7.2%
7.1%
400 Dexter Avenue North – Seattle/Lake Union
$
—
—
$
21,267
$
37,465
$
TBD
$
TBD
TBD
(1)
TBD
(1)
TBD
(1)
6040 George Watts Hill Drive –
Research Triangle Park/Research Triangle Park
$
—
$
9,812
$
14,378
$
1,610
$
25,800
8.1%
7.3%
8.1%
Consolidated development projects
$
367,243
$
409,619
$
181,000
$
TBD
$
TBD
(1)
The design and budget of this project are in process, and the estimated project costs with related yields are expected to be disclosed in the near future.
60
Current value-creation development projects – unconsolidated joint ventures
The following table sets forth our unconsolidated joint venture development projects as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
Leased Status
Project Start
Date
Initial Occupancy Date
Stabilized Occupancy Date
Project RSF
Leased
Negotiating
Total Leased/Negotiating
Property – Market/Submarket
In Service
CIP
Total
RSF
%
RSF
%
RSF
%
Unconsolidated joint venture development projects
360 Longwood Avenue –
Greater Boston/Longwood Medical
209,628
203,908
413,536
259,859
63
%
1,667
—
%
261,526
63
%
2Q12
3Q14
2016
1455/1515 Third Street –
San Francisco/Mission Bay
—
422,980
422,980
422,980
100
%
—
—
%
422,980
100
%
3Q14
1Q17
2017
Total
209,628
626,888
836,516
682,839
82
%
1,667
—
%
684,506
82
%
Investment
Cost to Complete
Unlevered
(1)
2015
Thereafter
Average Cash
Yield
Initial Stabilized Yield
(Cash Basis)
Initial Stabilized Yield
Property – Market/Submarket
Construction
Financing
Internal Funding
Construction
Financing
Internal Funding
Total at Completion
In Service
CIP
Unconsolidated joint venture development projects
(2)
100% of joint venture: 360 Longwood Avenue –
Greater Boston/Longwood Medical
$
153,356
$
154,430
$
24,336
$
—
$
17,878
$
—
$
350,000
100% of joint venture: 1455/1515 Third Street –
San Francisco/Mission Bay
(3)
$
21,150
$
110,344
$
—
$
35,192
$
—
$
TBD
$
TBD
ARE share of unconsolidated joint venture development projects
(2)
27.5% of joint venture: 360 Longwood Avenue –
Greater Boston/Longwood Medical
$
46,467
$
46,852
$
6,692
$
550
$
4,916
$
3,488
$
108,965
8.2%
(3)
7.3%
(3)
7.8%
(3)
51.0% of joint venture: 1455/1515 Third Street –
San Francisco/Mission Bay
$
10,787
$
59,018
$
—
$
19,450
$
—
$
TBD
$
TBD
TBD
(4)
TBD
(4)
TBD
(4)
Total ARE share of unconsolidated joint venture
development projects
$
57,254
$
105,870
$
6,692
$
20,000
$
4,916
$
TBD
$
TBD
(1)
Our projected unlevered initial stabilized yield (cash basis) is based upon our share of the investment in real estate, including costs incurred directly by us outside of the joint venture. Development management fees earned from these development projects have been excluded from our estimate of unlevered yields.
(2)
Refer to
pages
69
for additional information regarding our unconsolidated joint ventures.
(3)
The unlevered initial stabilized yields have been updated to reflect rental rates achieved on recently executed leases as well as our expectations for future rental rates for the remaining
152,010
RSF that we are currently marketing. The yields decreased from previously disclosed estimated yields of 9.3% average cash yield, 8.3% for initial stabilized yield (cash basis), and 8.9% for initial stabilized yield.
(4)
The design and budget of this project are in process, and the estimated project costs with related yields are expected to be disclosed in the near future.
61
Near-term and future value-creation development projects in North America
The following table summarizes the components of the book value and square footage of our near-term and future value-creation development projects in North America as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands, except per square foot amounts):
Square Feet
Property – Market/Submarket
Book Value
Value-Creation Project
Embedded Land
(1)
Total
Cost Per
Square Foot
Near-Term Value-Creation Development Projects –
Land undergoing predevelopment activities (CIP)
100 Binney Street – Greater Boston/Cambridge
(2)
$
140,488
431,483
—
431,483
$
326
510 Townsend Street – San Francisco/SoMa
61,268
300,000
—
300,000
204
505 Brannan Street – San Francisco/SoMa
23,195
135,000
—
135,000
172
East 29th Street – New York City/Manhattan
—
—
420,000
(3)
420,000
—
5200 Illumina Way – San Diego/University Town Center
9,487
386,044
—
386,044
25
10300 Campus Point Drive–Bldg 2 – San Diego/University Town Center
6,302
292,387
(4)
—
292,387
22
4796 Executive Drive – San Diego/University Town Center
5,371
61,755
—
61,755
87
Near-term value-creation development projects
246,111
1,606,669
420,000
2,026,669
121
Future Value-Creation Development Projects –
Land held for development
Alexandria Technology Square
®
– Greater Boston/Cambridge
7,721
100,000
—
100,000
77
505 Brannan Street Expansion – San Francisco/SoMa
11,855
165,000
—
165,000
72
Grand Avenue – San Francisco/South San Francisco
(5)
45,056
397,132
—
397,132
113
560 Eccles Avenue – San Francisco/South San Francisco
(6)
17,655
144,000
—
144,000
123
ARE Sunrise – San Diego/Torrey Pines
—
—
133,000
133,000
—
1150/1165/1166 Eastlake Avenue East – Seattle/Lake Union
(7)
33,995
266,266
—
266,266
128
1818 Fairview Avenue East – Seattle/Lake Union
8,381
188,490
—
188,490
44
Other
59,321
1,927,487
486,000
2,413,487
25
Future value-creation development projects
183,984
3,188,375
619,000
3,807,375
48
Total near-term and future value-creation development projects in North America
$
430,095
4,795,044
1,039,000
5,834,044
$
74
(1)
Embedded land generally represents adjacent land acquired in connection with the acquisition of operating properties. As a result, the real estate basis attributable to these land parcels is primarily classified in rental properties.
(2)
Includes infrastructure-related costs consisting of utility access and roads, installation of storm drain systems, infiltration systems, traffic lighting/signals, streets, and sidewalks.
(3)
We hold a right to ground-lease a parcel supporting the future ground-up development of approximately 420,000 SF at the Alexandria Center
®
for Life Science pursuant to an option under our ground lease. We have begun discussions regarding this option and the potential to increase the site density beyond 420,000 SF.
(4)
In July 2015, we acquired 10290 Campus Point Drive, a property aggregating 304,326 RSF. This highly strategic acquisition is located adjacent to our uniquely positioned life science campus at the Alexandria Center
®
for Life Science at Campus Pointe with high-quality on-site amenities in the heart of our University Town Center submarket. The acquired property is 100% leased to the previous owner through September 30, 2015. In June 2015, we leased the entire 304,326 RSF to Eli Lilly and Company for 15.5 years. In October 2015, we expect to commence conversion of the space into Class A office/laboratory space through redevelopment. Upon completion of this redevelopment project, Eli Lilly and Company will relocate its existing presence at 10300 Campus Point Drive of 125,409 RSF and the previously announced 106,173 RSF expansion, into our recently acquired 10290 Campus Point Drive. These changes resulted in a net increase of 72,744 RSF leased to Eli Lilly and Company at the campus. Our campus will ultimately contain an aggregate of 1,046,472 RSF, including 292,387 RSF of capacity for future ground-up development.
(5)
Represents two additional land parcels located adjacent to/surrounding the recently developed 249/259/269 East Grand Avenue campus leased to Amgen Inc. in South San Francisco.
(6)
Represents an additional land parcel located nearby our 341/343 Oyster Point Boulevard properties and within walking distance of Roche’s campus in South San Francisco.
(7)
The cost per square foot for 1165 Eastlake Avenue East includes an existing structure that can substantially be incorporated into the development plans.
62
Summary of capital expenditures
The following table summarizes the total projected construction spending for the year ending
December 31, 2015
, which includes interest, property taxes, insurance, payroll, and other indirect project costs (in thousands):
Projected Construction Spending
Six Months Ending December 31, 2015
Current value-creation projects:
Development (consolidated)
$
181,000
Development (unconsolidated joint venture)
20,000
Developments/redevelopments recently transferred to rental properties
60,000
(1)
Generic laboratory infrastructure/building improvement projects
40,000
(2)
Current value-creation projects
301,000
Near-term value-creation projects
144,000
(3)
Value-creation projects
445,000
Non-revenue-enhancing capital expenditures and tenant improvements
7,000
Projected construction spending for the six months ending
December 31, 2015 (midpoint)
$
452,000
Full-Year Construction Spending Guidance
Year Ending December 31, 2015
Projected construction spending for the six months ending
December 31, 2015 (range)
$
402,000
–
502,000
Actual construction spending for the six months ended June 30, 2015
197,672
Guidance range for the year ending December 31, 2015
$
600,000
–
700,000
(1)
Includes spending for projects recently placed into service, including 11055/11065/11075 Roselle Street, 4757 Nexus Center Drive, and 1616 Eastlake Avenue East, that may require additional construction prior to occupancy, generally ranging from 15,000 to 30,000 RSF of the project, plus amounts related to 75/125 Binney Street.
(2)
Includes, among others, 3535 General Atomics Court, 9373 Town Center Drive, 5810/5820/6175 Nancy Ridge Drive, 44 Hartwell Avenue, 19 Presidential Way, and 2525 East NC Highway 54.
(3)
See overview of our near-term value-creation projects on pages
59
and
62
.
63
Our construction spending for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Actual Construction Spending
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Development
$
114,678
Redevelopment
24,687
Predevelopment
20,162
Generic laboratory infrastructure/building improvement projects
(1)
32,299
Asia
5,846
Total construction spending
$
197,672
(1)
Includes revenue-enhancing projects and non-revenue-enhancing capital expenditures shown in the table below.
The table below reconciles construction spending on an accrual basis to our additions to properties on a cash basis (in thousands):
Actual Construction Spending
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Construction spending (accrual basis)
$
197,672
Change in accrued construction
27,469
Other
1,161
Additions to real estate (cash basis)
$
226,302
The tables below show the average per RSF of property-related non-revenue-enhancing capital expenditures, tenant improvements, and leasing costs, excluding capital expenditures and tenant improvements that are recoverable from client tenants, revenue-enhancing, or related to properties that have undergone redevelopment (in thousands, except RSF and per RSF amounts):
Non-Revenue-Enhancing Capital Expenditures, Tenant Improvements, and Leasing Costs
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Recent Average
Per RSF
(1)
Amount
RSF
Per RSF
Non-revenue-enhancing capital expenditures
$
5,021
15,913,666
$
0.32
$
0.35
Tenant improvements and leasing costs:
Re-tenanted space
$
4,650
316,361
$
14.70
$
13.40
Renewal space
7,554
955,967
7.90
6.69
Total tenant improvements and leasing costs/weighted-average
$
12,204
1,272,328
$
9.59
$
8.25
(1)
Represents the average of the years ended December 31, 2011, through December 31, 2014, and the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, annualized.
Value-creation projects – commencement of development projects in North America
During the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, we commenced two value-creation ground-up development projects in North America, consisting of our development of (i) a
530,477
RSF project at 50/60 Binney Street in our Cambridge submarket, which is
98%
leased or under negotiation, including
267,277
RSF, or
50%
of the project, leased to Sanofi, and (ii) a
287,806
RSF project at 400 Dexter Avenue North in our Lake Union submarket, which is currently
31%
leased to
Juno Therapeutics, Inc.
, which also has an expansion option to lease an additional
70,204
RSF. Refer to further information under “Current Value-Creation Development Projects – Consolidated” appearing elsewhere in Item 2 of this report.
64
External growth – value-creation development and redevelopment projects placed into service
The following table presents key value-creation development and redevelopment projects placed into service, including our unconsolidated joint ventures, during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
%
of Project
in Service
Unlevered
RSF in Service
Average
Cash
Yield
Initial Stabilized Yield
(Cash Basis)
Initial Stabilized Yield
Date of Latest Placed into Service
Placed into Service Prior to 1/1/15
2015 Projects Placed into Service
Total Placed into Service
Total Project
Property – Market/Submarket
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Leased/
Negotiating
Investment
Consolidated development projects
75/125 Binney Street – Greater Boston/Cambridge
March 2015
—
388,270
—
388,270
100%
99%
$
361,000
(1)
9.3
%
(1)
8.4
%
(1)
8.3
%
(1)
430 East 29th Street – New York City/Manhattan
April 2015
241,417
43,209
3,611
288,237
69%
98%
$
463,245
7.1
%
(2)
6.6
%
(2)
6.5
%
(2)
3013/3033 Science Park Road – San Diego/Torrey Pines
February 2015
42,047
60,891
—
102,938
62%
81%
$
104,790
7.7
%
(2)
7.2
%
(2)
7.1
%
(2)
Unconsolidated joint venture development project
360 Longwood Avenue –
Greater Boston/Longwood Medical
June 2015
155,524
2,107
51,997
209,628
51%
63%
$
108,965
(3)
8.2
%
(4)
7.3
%
(4)
7.8
%
(4)
Consolidated redevelopment projects
225 Second Avenue – Greater Boston/Route 128
May 2015
—
—
112,500
112,500
100%
100%
$
47,172
9.0
%
(2)
8.3
%
(2)
8.4
%
(5)
11055/11065/11075 Roselle Street –
San Diego/Sorrento Valley
June 2015
23,936
—
31,277
55,213
100%
75%
$
18,193
8.1
%
(6)
7.9
%
(6)
8.0
%
(6)
(1)
Previously disclosed estimated yields were 9.1% average cash yield, 8.0% for initial stabilized yield (cash basis), and 8.2% for initial stabilized yield and cost of completion was $351.4 million. The increase in yields and investment into the project reflect the final terms of our lease with ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and excludes an additional $25 per RSF tenant improvement allowance available to the tenant in the future. If the tenant elects to use this allowance, the total cost at completion could increase up to an additional $10 million with an increase in rental income and an estimated 0.1% increase in our initial stabilized yield from 8.3% to 8.4%.
(2)
Consistent with previously disclosed estimated yields.
(3)
Represents only ARE’s investment at completion related to its 27.5% interest in this unconsolidated joint venture. See pages
61
and
69
for additional information.
(4)
The unlevered initial stabilized yields have been updated to reflect rental rates achieved on recently executed leases as well as our expectations for future rental rates for the remaining
152,010
RSF that we are currently marketing. The yields decreased from previously disclosed estimated yields of 9.3% average cash yield, 8.3% for initial stabilized yield (cash basis), and 8.9% for initial stabilized yield.
(5)
Increased from previously disclosed estimated yield of 8.3% for initial stabilized yield. The increase in the initial stabilized yield and investment into the project reflect the final terms of our lease with the client tenant.
(6)
Increased from previously discl
osed estimated yields of 8.0% for average cash yield, 7.8% for initial stabilized yield (cash basis), and 7.9% for initial stabilized yield. The increase in the yields
reflects the final project costs.
65
External growth – acquisitions
The following table presents acquisitions completed during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, and an acquisition completed in July 2015 (dollars in thousands):
Unlevered
Property – Market/Submarket
Date Acquired
Number of Properties
Gross Purchase Price
Loan Assumption
Percentage
Average
Cash Yield
Initial
Stabilized Yield (Cash)
Initial
Stabilized Yield
Type
RSF
Leased
Negotiating
640 Memorial Drive –
Greater Boston/Cambridge
Operating
1/21/15
1
$
176,500
$
82,000
(1)
225,504
100.0%
—%
6.8%
6.4%
7.5%
Alexandria Technology Square
®
(10% noncontrolling interest) – Greater Boston/Cambridge
Operating
1/21/15
N/A
(2)
108,250
(2)
—
1,181,635
99.5%
—%
6.1%
(3)
5.4%
(3)
6.1%
(3)
505 Brannan Street – San Francisco/SoMa
Land
4/30/15
—
34,000
—
300,000
(4)
—%
—%
TBD
TBD
TBD
1818 Fairview Avenue East – Seattle/Lake Union
Land
5/6/15
—
8,444
(5)
—
188,490
—%
—%
TBD
TBD
TBD
1
$
327,194
$
82,000
1,895,629
Subsequent acquisitions of redevelopment project
10290 Campus Point Drive –
San Diego/
University Town Center
Redevelopment
7/1/15
1
$
105,000
$
—
304,326
100.0%
—%
TBD
(6)
TBD
(6)
TBD
(6)
(1)
Represents a secured note payable with a contractual rate of 3.93% and a maturity date in 2023.
(2)
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we executed an agreement to purchase the outstanding
10%
noncontrolling interest in our
1.2 million
RSF flagship campus at Alexandria Technology Square
®
for
$108.3 million
. Upon execution of the purchase agreement, we recognized a liability representing the fair value of the aggregate consideration, primarily consisting of the
$108.3 million
purchase price. The first installment of
$54.3 million
was paid on April 1, 2015, and the second installment of
$54.0 million
is due on April 1, 2016. For additional information, refer to Note 11 – “Noncontrolling Interests” to our unaudited consolidated financial statements under Item 1 of this report.
(3)
We believe there is further upside in our projected returns as we anticipate significant rent growth from 81% of the leases contractually ending in the five years following the date of acquisition. Additionally, we believe we can increase our 1.2 million RSF campus by an additional 100,000 RSF and further increase NOI. The campus is currently 100% occupied and subject to a long-term ground lease. After considering the $108.3 million purchase of the outstanding 10% noncontrolling interest in this flagship campus and the anticipated near- and medium-term upside in NOI from rental rate growth and campus expansion, we estimate that we can enhance our unlevered yields on our aggregate investment in the campus over the next five years to 8.5% and 8.1% (cash).
(4)
Ground-up development of a tech office building at 505 Brannan Street. This site is fully entitled under Proposition M for 135,000 RSF, and subject to market conditions, we expect to commence construction on the first phase of the project in the near term. We are also pursuing entitlements for a second phase aggregating 165,000 RSF, which will be built on top of the first phase. We expect to disclose the estimated investment and yields upon commencement of each phase of the ground-up development.
(5)
We acquired this site for future development, and the land parcel is subject to a long-term ground lease. The land parcel is located adjacent to one of our existing campuses in the Lake Union submarket.
(6)
In July 2015, we acquired 10290 Campus Point Drive, a property aggregating
304,326
RSF. This highly strategic acquisition is located adjacent to our uniquely positioned life science campus at the Alexandria Center
®
for Life Science at Campus Pointe with high-quality on-site amenities in the heart of our University Town Center submarket. The acquired property is 100% leased to the previous owner through September 30, 2015. In June 2015, we leased the entire
304,326
RSF property to Eli Lilly and Company for 15.5 years. In October 2015, we expect to commence conversion of the space into Class A office/laboratory space through redevelopment. Upon completion of this redevelopment project, Eli Lilly and Company will relocate its existing presence at 10300 Campus Point Drive of 125,409 RSF and the previously announced 106,173 RSF expansion, into our recently acquired 10290 Campus Point Drive. These changes resulted in a net increase of 72,744 RSF leased to Eli Lilly and Company at the campus. Our campus will ultimately contain an aggregate of 1,046,472 RSF, including 292,387 RSF of capacity for future ground-up development.
66
Dispositions and other sources of capital
The following table presents real estate asset sales completed during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, and pending and projected remainder/asset sales for the balance of 2015 (dollars in thousands):
Property – Market/Submarket
Date Sold
Number of Operating Properties
Square Feet
Annual NOI
(1)
Sales Price
(2)
Dispositions completed in the first quarter of 2015
661 University Avenue – Canada/Toronto
January
1
N/A
$
(1,363
)
$
54,104
Other
January/ March
2
196,859
(595
)
14,335
Dispositions completed in first quarter of 2015
$
(1,958
)
68,439
Dispositions completed in the second quarter of 2015
270 Third Street – Greater Boston/Cambridge
(3)
Sales price
June
—
N/A
$
—
43,000
Construction funding assumed by buyer
(17,523)
Net proceeds
25,477
Pending/targeted asset sales
225 Binney Street – Greater Boston/Cambridge
(sale of 70% interest at 4.5% cash cap rate)
(4)
1
305,212
$
9,332
(4)
190,110
500 Forbes Boulevard – San Francisco/South San Francisco
1
155,685
$
5,628
240,974
to
290,974
Other
240,000
$
8,200
Completed and pending/targeted asset sales
525,000
to
575,000
Projected – remainder/asset sales
TBD
TBD
195,000
to
245,000
Total dispositions completed and other sources of capital
(5)
$
720,000
to
$
820,000
(1)
Annualized using actual results for the quarter ended prior to the date of sale or the second quarter of 2015 for pending/targeted asset sales as of
June 30, 2015
.
(2)
Represents the sales price for completed dispositions and the estimated sales price for pending/targeted asset sales as of
June 30, 2015
.
(3)
Represents a residential project under construction totaling 91 units at the Alexandria Center
®
at Kendall Square. Our projected key sources and uses of capital reflect the savings of
$17.5 million
in projected construction spending.
(4)
In July 2015, we executed an agreement to sell a
70%
interest in our 225 Binney Street property to a high-quality institutional investor for
$190.1 million
at a
4.5%
cash cap rate. We expect to complete the sale in the fourth quarter of 2015. Annual NOI represents a
70%
share of annualized second quarter 2015 NOI of
$13.3 million
(including straight-line rent) for this property. Annualized NOI for the three months ended
June 30, 2015
, excluding straight-line rent, was $8.7 million.
(5)
We anticipate a portion of dispositions and other sources of capital will come from the sale of equity investments in publicly traded entities. As of
June 30, 2015
, our
$172.6 million
of equity investments in publicly traded entities had unrealized gains aggregating
$138.7 million
.
67
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
360 Longwood Avenue
We are currently developing a building aggregating
413,536
RSF in the Longwood Medical submarket of the Greater Boston market through an unconsolidated joint venture. We expect to earn unlevered yields on our share of the gross real estate in the joint venture as follows: (i) an initial stabilized yield of
7.8%
, (ii) an initial stabilized yield (cash basis) of
7.3%
, and (iii) an average cash yield during the term of the initial leases of
8.2%
. Our projected unlevered yields are based upon our share of the investment in real estate of the joint venture at completion of approximately
$109.0 million
, including costs incurred directly by us outside the joint venture. In addition to these yields, we will receive recurring monthly property management fees thereafter from this project. Construction management and other fees have been excluded from our estimate of unlevered yields. Refer to Note 3 – “Investments in Real Estate.”
1455/1515 Third Street
Alexandria and Uber entered into a joint venture agreement and acquired two land parcels supporting the development of two buildings aggregating
422,980
RSF at 1455/1515 Third Street in the Mission Bay submarket in San Francisco for a total purchase price of
$125.0 million
. We are in the process of finalizing the design and construction budget with Uber, and we expect to provide the total estimated cost at completion and estimate of yields in the near future. Refer to Note 3 – “Investments in Real Estate.”
68
The following table sets forth the information related to our unconsolidated joint ventures as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
Three months ended June 30, 2015
360 Longwood Avenue
1455/1515 Third Street
Total ARE
Share
100%
ARE’s 27.5%
Share
100%
ARE’s 51%
Share
Revenue
$
4,491
$
1,300
(1)
$
47
$
24
$
1,324
Rental operations
(1,167
)
(320
)
(142
)
(73
)
(393
)
Interest
(139
)
(38
)
—
—
(38
)
Depreciation and amortization
(831
)
(285
)
(132
)
(67
)
(352
)
Net income (loss)
$
2,354
$
657
$
(227
)
$
(116
)
$
541
Six months ended June 30, 2015
360 Longwood Avenue
1455/1515 Third Street
Total ARE
Share
100%
ARE’s 27.5%
Share
100%
ARE’s 51%
Share
Revenue
$
8,476
$
2,474
(1)
$
138
$
71
$
2,545
Rental operations
(2,230
)
(615
)
(272
)
(139
)
(754
)
Interest
(150
)
(42
)
—
—
(42
)
Depreciation and amortization
(1,410
)
(499
)
(264
)
(135
)
(634
)
Net income (loss)
$
4,686
$
1,318
$
(398
)
$
(203
)
$
1,115
As of June 30, 2015
360 Longwood Avenue
1455/1515 Third Street
Total ARE
Share
(2)
100%
ARE’s 27.5%
Share
(2)
100%
ARE’s 51%
Share
(2)
Rental properties
$
153,356
$
46,467
$
21,150
$
10,787
$
57,254
Construction in progress
154,430
46,852
110,344
59,018
105,870
Gross investments in real estate
307,786
93,319
131,494
69,805
163,124
Less: accumulated depreciation
(1,919
)
(649
)
(441
)
(225
)
(874
)
Investments in real estate
305,867
92,670
131,053
69,580
162,250
Other assets
16,620
5,433
8,439
4,447
9,880
Total assets
$
322,487
$
98,103
$
139,492
$
74,027
$
172,130
Secured notes payable
$
170,531
(3)
$
46,896
$
—
$
—
$
46,896
Other liabilities
5,407
1,487
5,279
2,692
4,179
Total liabilities
175,938
48,383
5,279
2,692
51,075
Equity
146,549
49,720
134,213
71,335
121,055
Total liabilities and equity
$
322,487
$
98,103
$
139,492
$
74,027
$
172,130
RSF
RSF
Rental properties
209,628
—
Active development (CIP)
(4)
203,908
422,980
Total
413,536
422,980
(1)
Includes development and property management fees earned.
(2)
Amounts include costs incurred directly by us outside of the joint ventures. We believe the information on our share of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures is useful information for investors as it provides our proportional share of the investments in real estate from all properties, including our share of the assets and liabilities of our unconsolidated joint ventures. This information also allows investors to estimate the impact of real estate investments and debt financing at the joint venture level.
(3)
Secured construction loan with an aggregate commitment of
$213.2 million
, which bears interest at LIBOR+3.75%, with a floor of 5.25%. The maturity date of the loan is April 1, 2017, with two, one-year options to extend the stated maturity date to April 1, 2019, subject to certain conditions.
(4)
Refer to page
61
for further detail of our unconsolidated joint venture development projects.
69
Real estate investments in Asia
Our investments in real estate in Asia consisted of the following as of
June 30, 2015
:
Number of Properties
ABR
(in thousands)
Occupancy Percentage
Book Value
(1)
(in thousands)
Square Feet
Rental properties in China
2
$
1,222
53.6
%
$
80,618
634,328
Rental properties in India
6
5,641
65.5
70,037
565,386
Rental properties in Asia
8
$
6,863
59.2
%
150,655
1,199,714
Land held for future development in India
78,911
6,419,707
Total investments in real estate in Asia
$
229,566
(1)
7,619,421
(1) Includes cumulative unrealized foreign currency translation losses of approximately
$42.4 million
as of
June 30, 2015
.
70
Results of operations
Key operating metrics
Favorable Lease Structure
Same Property NOI Increase
Percentage of
triple net leases
96%
Percentage of leases
containing annual
rent escalations
94%
Percentage of leases
providing for
the recapture of
capital expenditures
94%
NOI – Key Driver of NAV Growth
Occupancy of Operating Properties
North America
(2)
Rental Rate Increases:
Renewed/Re-leased Space
Adjusted EBITDA Margin
(1)
65%
(1)
Represents the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, annualized.
(2)
As of the end of each respective period.
71
Same Properties
As a result of changes within our total property portfolio, the financial data presented in the table in “Comparison of the
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
, to the
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
,” and “Comparison of the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
, to the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
,” show significant changes in revenue and expenses from period to period. In order to supplement an evaluation of our results of operations, we analyze the operating performance for all properties that were operating for the periods presented (“Same Properties”) separate from properties acquired subsequent to the beginning of the earliest period presented, properties currently undergoing development or redevelopment, and corporate entities (legal entities performing general and administrative functions), which are excluded from Same Properties’ results (“Non-Same Properties”). Additionally, rental revenues from lease termination fees, if any, are excluded from the results of Same Properties.
The following table presents information regarding our Same Properties for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2015
:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
Percentage change in NOI over comparable period from prior year
0.5%
1.4%
Percentage change in NOI (cash basis) over comparable period from prior year
4.7%
6.2%
Operating margin
70%
70%
Number of Same Properties
168
164
RSF
14,156,773
13,997,651
Occupancy – current-period average
95.7%
95.9%
Occupancy – same-period prior-year average
95.8%
95.6%
The following table reconciles the number of Same Properties to total properties for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
:
Development – current
Properties
50/60 Binney Street
2
430 East 29th Street
1
5200 Illumina Way – Building 6
1
3013/3033 Science Park Road
2
400 Dexter Avenue North
1
6040 George Watts Hill Drive
1
360 Longwood Avenue (unconsol. joint venture)
1
1455/1515 Third Street (unconsol. joint venture)
2
11
Development – placed into service after January 1, 2014
Properties
269 East Grand Avenue
1
499 Illinois Street
1
75/125 Binney Street
1
3
Redevelopment – placed into service after January 1, 2014
Properties
225 Second Avenue
1
11055/1065/11075 Roselle Street
3
10121 Barnes Canyon Road
1
5
Summary
Properties
Development – current
11
Projects placed into service after
January 1, 2014:
Development
3
Redevelopment
5
Development – Asia
2
Acquisitions after January 1, 2014:
3545 Cray Court
1
4025/4031/4045 Sorrento Valley Boulevard
3
9625 Towne Centre Drive
1
640 Memorial Drive
1
Properties “held-for-sale” in current or
preceding periods
3
Total properties excluded from Same Properties
30
Same Properties
164
Total properties for the six months ended
June 30, 2015
194
72
Comparison of the three months ended
June 30, 2015
, to the three months ended
June 30, 2014
The following table presents a comparison of the components of NOI for our Same Properties and Non-Same Properties for the three months ended
June 30, 2015
, compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2014
, and a reconciliation of NOI to income from continuing operations, the most directly comparable financial measure (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
$ Change
% Change
Revenues:
Rental – Same Properties
$
127,800
$
127,658
$
142
0.1
%
Rental – Non-Same Properties
24,005
7,334
16,671
227.3
Total rental
151,805
134,992
16,813
12.5
Tenant recoveries – Same Properties
43,253
39,757
3,496
8.8
Tenant recoveries – Non-Same Properties
6,341
1,187
5,154
434.2
Total tenant recoveries
49,594
40,944
8,650
21.1
Other income – Same Properties
21
234
(213
)
(91.0
)
Other income – Non-Same Properties
2,736
232
2,504
1,079.3
Total other income
2,757
466
2,291
491.6
Total revenues – Same Properties
171,074
167,649
3,425
2.0
Total revenues – Non-Same Properties
33,082
8,753
24,329
278.0
Total revenues
204,156
176,402
27,754
15.7
Expenses:
Rental operations – Same Properties
51,759
48,961
2,798
5.7
Rental operations – Non-Same Properties
10,491
3,392
7,099
209.3
Total rental operations
62,250
52,353
9,897
18.9
Our share of NOI from unconsolidated joint ventures:
Joint venture NOI – Same Properties
—
—
—
—
Joint venture NOI – Non-Same Properties
931
—
931
100.0
Our share of NOI from unconsolidated joint ventures
931
—
931
100.0
NOI from continuing operations:
NOI – Same Properties
119,315
118,688
627
0.5
NOI – Non-Same Properties
23,522
5,361
18,161
338.8
Total NOI from continuing operations
142,837
124,049
18,788
15.1
Other expenses:
General and administrative
14,989
13,836
1,153
8.3
Interest
26,668
17,433
9,235
53.0
Depreciation and amortization
62,171
57,314
4,857
8.5
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
189
—
189
100.0
104,017
88,583
15,434
17.4
Less: our share of NOI from unconsolidated joint ventures
(931
)
—
(931
)
(100.0
)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
541
—
541
100.0
Income from continuing operations
$
38,430
$
35,466
$
2,964
8.4
%
NOI – Same Properties
$
119,315
$
118,688
$
627
0.5
%
Less: straight-line rent adjustments
(3,818
)
(8,412
)
4,594
(54.6
)
NOI (cash basis) – Same Properties
$
115,497
$
110,276
$
5,221
4.7
%
73
Rental revenues
Total rental revenues for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, increased by
$16.8 million
, or
12.5%
, to
$151.8 million
, compared to
$135.0 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2014
. The increase was primarily due to rental revenues from our Non-Same Properties, including highly leased development and redevelopment projects aggregating
1,138,483
RSF that were placed into service subsequent to
April 1, 2014
, and operating properties aggregating
359,235
RSF that were acquired subsequent to
April 1, 2014
, and consisted of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Change
Development related
$
19,186
$
5,359
$
13,827
Acquisitions related
4,010
—
4,010
Other
809
1,975
(1,166
)
Rental revenues – Non-Same Properties
$
24,005
$
7,334
$
16,671
In addition, rental revenues from our Same Properties were
$127.8 million
and
$127.7 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
and 2014, respectively, due to the consistent occupancy of
95.7%
and
95.8%
, respectively, over the comparable periods.
Tenant recoveries
Tenant recoveries for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, increased by
$8.7 million
, or
21.1%
, to
$49.6 million
, compared to
$40.9 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2014
. This increase is relatively consistent with the increase in our rental operating expenses of
$9.9 million
, or
18.9%
. Same Properties’ tenant recoveries increased by
$3.5 million
, or
8.8%
, primarily as a result of an increase in Same Properties’ rental operating expenses of
$2.8 million
, or
5.7%
. Same Properties’ rental operating expenses increased during the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2014
, primarily related to (i) higher property taxes resulting from annual property tax reassessments and (ii) higher utilities due to increases in utility rates for properties in the San Francisco and San Diego markets. Non-Same Properties’ tenant recoveries increased by
$5.2 million
as a result of a Non-Same Properties’ rental operating expense increase of
$7.1 million
, primarily related to development and redevelopment projects placed into service subsequent to
April 1, 2014
, and operating properties acquired subsequent to
April 1, 2014
, as noted above.
Other income
Other income for the three months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Change
Management fee income
$
257
$
916
$
(659
)
Interest and other income
379
911
(532
)
Investment income (loss)
2,121
(1,361
)
3,482
Total other income
$
2,757
$
466
$
2,291
Rental operating expenses
Total rental operating expenses for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, increased by
$9.9 million
, or
18.9%
, to
$62.3 million
, compared to
$52.4 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2014
. Approximately
$7.1 million
of the increase was due to an increase in rental operating expenses from our Non-Same Properties, primarily related to development and redevelopment projects placed into service subsequent to
April 1, 2014
, and operating properties acquired subsequent to
April 1, 2014
, as mentioned above. The increase in Same Properties rental operating expenses of
$2.8 million
was primarily due to higher property taxes and higher utility costs as described in “Tenant Recoveries” above.
74
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, increased by
$1.2 million
, or
8.3%
, to
$15.0 million
, compared to
$13.8 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2014
. General and administrative expenses increased primarily due to growth in both the depth and breadth of our operations in multiple markets. As a percentage of total assets, our general and administrative expenses were consistent at
0.7%
and
0.7%
for the 12 months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, respectively.
Interest expense
Interest expense for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
and 2014, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
Component
2015
2014
Change
Secured notes payable
$
7,911
$
7,087
$
824
Unsecured senior notes payable
17,406
11,241
6,165
Unsecured senior line of credit
2,651
2,698
(47
)
Unsecured senior bank term loans
3,435
3,757
(322
)
Interest rate swaps
710
1,123
(413
)
Amortization of loan fees and other interest
2,992
2,829
163
Total interest incurred
35,105
28,735
6,370
Capitalized interest
(8,437
)
(11,302
)
2,865
Total interest expense
$
26,668
$
17,433
$
9,235
Total interest expense increased by
$9.2 million
during the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2014
, primarily as a result of a
$6.4 million
increase in interest incurred and a
$2.9 million
decrease in the amount of interest capitalized as a result of our highly leased development and redevelopment projects placed into service subsequent to
April 1, 2014
, as noted above.
The increase of
$6.4 million
in total interest incurred was primarily due to an approximate
$758.1 million
increase in outstanding debt used to fund the construction of our development and redevelopment projects since June 30, 2014. In July 2014, we completed an offering of $700 million of unsecured senior notes payable with a weighted-average interest rate of 3.50% and a maturity of 9.6 years. Proceeds from our July 2014 offering were used to repay $125 million under our unsecured senior bank term loans and to reduce amounts outstanding under our unsecured senior line of credit. Interest from our unsecured senior bank term loans and interest rate swaps decreased by an aggregate
$735 thousand
, as we continued to transition from variable-rate bank debt to long-term unsecured fixed-rate debt. In addition, interest rate swaps aggregating $200.0 million with rates averaging 5.0% expired on March 31, 2014, which decreased related interest costs.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, increased by
$4.9 million
, or
8.5%
, to
$62.2 million
, compared to
$57.3 million
for the
three months ended June 30, 2014
. Depreciation increased primarily due to additional depreciation from development and redevelopment projects placed into service subsequent to
April 1, 2014
, and operating properties acquired subsequent to
April 1, 2014
, as noted above.
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
During the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt to expense a portion of unamortized loan fees aggregating
$189 thousand
upon our
$25.0 million
partial principal repayment under our unsecured senior bank term loan.
75
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures of
$541 thousand
for the
three months ended June 30, 2015
, primarily includes the operating results of our property at 360 Longwood Avenue in Greater Boston that was placed into service during the three months ended December 31, 2014. As of
June 30, 2015
, we had
209,628
RSF, or
51%
of this property, in service at 100% occupancy and
203,908
RSF, or 49% of this project, under development.
Gain on sales of real estate
–
land parcels
During the
three months ended June 30, 2014
, we completed the sale of
one
parcel of land in our Seattle market, aggregating
150,000
RSF for an aggregate sales price of
$19.0 million
, and recognized an aggregate gain on sales of
$797 thousand
. These gains are classified in gain on sales of real estate – land parcels below income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
The land parcels sold did not meet the criteria for classification as discontinued operations since the parcels did not have any significant operations prior to disposition. Pursuant to the presentation and disclosure literature on gains/losses on sales or disposals by REITs required by the SEC, gains or losses on sales or disposals by a REIT that do not qualify as discontinued operations are classified below income from discontinued operations in the income statement. Accordingly, we classified the gain on sale of land parcel below income from discontinued operations, in the consolidated statements of income, and included the gain in income from continuing operations attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders in the “control number,” or numerator for the computation of EPS.
76
Comparison of the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, to the
six months ended June 30, 2014
The following table presents a comparison of the components of NOI for our Same Properties and Non-Same Properties for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2014
, and a reconciliation of NOI to income from continuing operations, the most directly comparable financial measure (dollars in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
$ Change
% Change
Revenues:
Rental – Same Properties
$
251,321
$
249,383
$
1,938
0.8
%
Rental – Non-Same Properties
44,092
16,179
27,913
172.5
Total rental
295,413
265,562
29,851
11.2
Tenant recoveries – Same Properties
85,937
79,889
6,048
7.6
Tenant recoveries – Non-Same Properties
12,051
2,737
9,314
340.3
Total tenant recoveries
97,988
82,626
15,362
18.6
Other income – Same Properties
33
270
(237
)
(87.8
)
Other income – Non-Same Properties
7,475
4,130
3,345
81.0
Total other income
7,508
4,400
3,108
70.6
Total revenues – Same Properties
337,291
329,542
7,749
2.4
Total revenues – Non-Same Properties
63,618
23,046
40,572
176.0
Total revenues
400,909
352,588
48,321
13.7
Expenses:
Rental operations – Same Properties
102,902
98,402
4,500
4.6
Rental operations – Non-Same Properties
20,571
6,458
14,113
218.5
Total rental operations
123,473
104,860
18,613
17.8
Our share of NOI from unconsolidated joint ventures:
Joint venture NOI – Same Properties
—
—
—
—
Joint venture NOI – Non-Same Properties
1,791
—
1,791
100.0
Our share of NOI from unconsolidated joint ventures
1,791
—
1,791
100.0
NOI from continuing operations:
NOI – Same Properties
234,389
231,140
3,249
1.4
NOI – Non-Same Properties
44,838
16,588
28,250
170.3
Total NOI from continuing operations
279,227
247,728
31,499
12.7
Other expenses:
General and administrative
29,376
27,060
2,316
8.6
Interest
49,904
36,556
13,348
36.5
Depreciation and amortization
121,091
107,735
13,356
12.4
Impairment of real estate
14,510
—
14,510
100.0
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
189
—
189
100.0
215,070
171,351
43,719
25.5
Less: our share of NOI from unconsolidated joint ventures
(1,791
)
—
(1,791
)
(100.0
)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
1,115
—
1,115
100.0
Income from continuing operations
$
63,481
$
76,377
$
(12,896
)
(16.9
)%
NOI – Same Properties
$
234,389
$
231,140
$
3,249
1.4
%
Less: straight-line rent adjustments
(6,559
)
(16,643
)
10,084
(60.6
)
NOI (cash basis) – Same Properties
$
227,830
$
214,497
$
13,333
6.2
%
77
Rental revenues
Total rental revenues for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, increased by
$29.9 million
, or
11.2%
, to
$295.4 million
, compared to
$265.6 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
. The increase was primarily due to rental revenues from our Non-Same Properties, including highly leased development and redevelopment projects aggregating
1,138,483
RSF that were placed into service subsequent to
January 1, 2014
, and operating properties aggregating
518,357
RSF that were acquired subsequent to
January 1, 2014
, and consisted of the following (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Change
Development related
$
30,727
$
9,749
$
20,978
Acquisitions related
10,194
2,304
7,890
Other
3,171
4,126
(955
)
Rental revenues – Non-Same Properties
$
44,092
$
16,179
$
27,913
In addition, rental revenues from our Same Properties increased to
$251.3 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to
$249.4 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily due to a 30 bps increase in occupancy from
95.6%
to
95.9%
for these properties over the comparable periods.
Tenant recoveries
Tenant recoveries for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, increased by
$15.4 million
, or
18.6%
, to
$98.0 million
, compared to
$82.6 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
. This increase is relatively consistent with the increase in our rental operating expenses of
$18.6 million
, or
17.8%
. Same Properties’ tenant recoveries increased by
$6.0 million
, or
7.6%
, primarily as a result of an increase in Same Properties’ rental operating expenses of
$4.5 million
, or
4.6%
, and the increase in occupancy described above. Same Properties’ rental operating expenses increased during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2014
, primarily related to (i) higher property taxes resulting from annual property tax reassessments, (ii) higher repairs and maintenance, and (iii) higher utility costs. Repairs and maintenance and utility costs increased in 2015 due to an increase in heating and snow removal expenses due to a more severe winter in 2015 and higher utility rates in 2015 for properties in the San Francisco and San Diego markets. Non-Same Properties’ tenant recoveries increased by
$9.3 million
as a result of a Non-Same Properties’ rental operating expense increase of
$14.1 million
primarily related to development and redevelopment projects placed into service subsequent to
January 1, 2014
, and operating properties acquired subsequent to
January 1, 2014
, as noted above.
Other income
Other income for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Change
Management fee income
$
811
$
1,642
$
(831
)
Interest and other income
864
1,773
(909
)
Investment income
5,833
985
4,848
Total other income
$
7,508
$
4,400
$
3,108
Rental operating expenses
Total rental operating expenses for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, increased by
$18.6 million
, or
17.8%
, to
$123.5 million
, compared to
$104.9 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
. Approximately
$14.1 million
of the increase was due to an increase in rental operating expenses from our Non-Same Properties, primarily related to development and redevelopment projects placed into service subsequent to
January 1, 2014
, and operating properties acquired subsequent to
January 1, 2014
, as mentioned above. The increase in Same Properties rental operating expenses of
$4.5 million
was primarily due to higher property taxes, higher repairs and maintenance, and higher utility costs, as described in “Tenant Recoveries” above.
78
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, increased by
$2.3 million
, or
8.6%
, to
$29.4 million
, compared to
$27.1 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
. General and administrative expenses increased primarily due to growth in both the depth and breadth of our operations in multiple markets. As a percentage of total assets, our general and administrative expenses were consistent at
0.7%
and
0.7%
for the 12 months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
, respectively.
Interest expense
Interest expense for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and 2014, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30,
Component
2015
2014
Change
Secured notes payable
$
15,620
$
15,058
$
562
Unsecured senior notes payable
34,811
22,481
12,330
Unsecured senior line of credit
4,724
4,737
(13
)
Unsecured senior bank term loans
6,776
7,499
(723
)
Interest rate swaps
1,215
4,613
(3,398
)
Amortization of loan fees and other interest
6,166
5,483
683
Total interest incurred
69,312
59,871
9,441
Capitalized interest
(19,408
)
(23,315
)
3,907
Total interest expense
$
49,904
$
36,556
$
13,348
Total interest expense increased by
$13.3 million
during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2014
, primarily as a result of a
$9.4 million
increase in interest incurred and a
$3.9 million
decrease in the amount of interest capitalized as a result of our highly leased development and redevelopment projects placed into service subsequent to
January 1, 2014
, as noted above.
The increase of
$9.4 million
in total interest incurred was primarily due to an approximate $758.1 million increase in outstanding debt used to fund the construction of our development and redevelopment projects since June 30, 2014. In July 2014, we completed an offering of $700 million of unsecured senior notes payable with a weighted-average interest rate of 3.50% and a maturity of 9.6 years. Proceeds from our July 2014 offering were used to repay $125 million under our unsecured senior bank term loans and to reduce amounts outstanding under our unsecured senior line of credit. Interest from our unsecured senior bank term loans and interest rate swaps decreased by an aggregate
$4.1 million
, as we continued to transition from variable-rate bank debt to long-term unsecured fixed-rate debt. In addition, interest rate swaps aggregating $200.0 million with rates averaging 5.0% expired on March 31, 2014, which decreased related interest costs.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, increased by
$13.4 million
, or
12.4%
, to
$121.1 million
, compared to
$107.7 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
. Depreciation increased primarily due to additional depreciation from development and redevelopment projects placed into service subsequent to
January 1, 2014
, and operating properties acquired subsequent to
January 1, 2014
, as noted above.
Impairment of real estate
In March 2015, we determined that a
175,000
RSF life science building in Hyderabad, India, met the criteria for classification as “held for sale” and consequently recognized an impairment charge of
$14.5 million
to lower the carrying costs of the real estate to its estimated fair value less cost to sell, including an estimated
$4.2 million
foreign exchange loss. On March 26, 2015, we completed the sale of the vacant building for
$12.4 million
. For additional information, refer to the section titled “Sales of Real Estate Assets and Related Impairment Charges” in Note 3 – “Investments in Real Estate” to our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements under Item 1 of this report.
79
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
During the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt to expense a portion of unamortized loan fees aggregating
$189 thousand
upon our
$25.0 million
partial principal repayment under our unsecured senior bank term loan.
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures of
$1.1 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, primarily includes the operating results of our property at 360 Longwood Avenue in Greater Boston that was placed into service during the three months ended December 31, 2014. As of
June 30, 2015
, we had
209,628
RSF, or
51%
of this property, in service at 100% occupancy and
203,908
RSF, or 49% of this project, under development.
Gain on sales of real estate
–
land parcels
During the
six months ended June 30, 2014
, we completed the sale of
one
parcel of land in our Seattle market, aggregating
150,000
RSF for an aggregate sales price of
$19.0 million
, and recognized an aggregate gain on sales of
$797 thousand
. These gains are classified in gain on sales of real estate – land parcel below income from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
The land parcels sold did not meet the criteria for classification as discontinued operations since the parcels did not have any significant operations prior to disposition. Pursuant to the presentation and disclosure literature on gains/losses on sales or disposals by REITs required by the SEC, gains or losses on sales or disposals by a REIT that do not qualify as discontinued operations are classified below income from discontinued operations in the income statement. Accordingly, we classified the gain on sale of land parcel below income from discontinued operations, in the consolidated statements of income, and included the gain in income from continuing operations attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders in the “control number,” or numerator for the computation of EPS.
80
Projected results
Based on our current view of existing market conditions and certain current assumptions, we have updated guidance for EPS attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – diluted and FFO per share attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – diluted, each for the year ending
December 31, 2015
, as set forth in the table below. The table below provides a reconciliation of FFO per share attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – diluted, a non-GAAP measure, to EPS, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, and other key assumptions included in our guidance for the year ending
December 31, 2015
.
Summary of Key
Changes in Guidance
Description
FFO per share – diluted
+ $0.02
Midpoint of range increased by $0.02 to $5.24, driven by strong leasing activity, and narrowed range from $0.10 to $0.06
(in thousands)
Description
Sources of capital:
Midpoint
Increase in income-producing asset sales generates higher proceeds resulting in a reduction in incremental debt. A portion of the incremental proceeds will fund the acquisition of a redevelopment opportunity at 10290 Campus Point Drive.
Incremental debt
$
(75,000
)
Acquisition (non-cash)
(135,000
)
Remainder/asset sales
115,000
Reduction in projected construction spending includes, among other items, approximately $17.5 million of construction funding assumed by the buyer of 270 Third Street (see page
67
)
Net decrease in sources of capital
$
(95,000
)
Uses of capital:
Construction
$
(45,000
)
Decrease in acquisitions primarily due to change in timing of non-cash acquisition from 2015 to 2016, offset by purchase in July 2015, of 10290 Campus Point Drive, a 100% pre-leased redevelopment project
Acquisition
(50,000
)
Decrease in uses of capital
$
(95,000
)
EPS and FFO Per Share Attributable to Alexandria’s Common Stockholders – Diluted
Earnings per share
$1.44 to $1.50
Add: depreciation and amortization
3.59
Add: impairment of real estate
0.20
Other
(0.02)
FFO per share
$5.21 to $5.27
Key Assumptions
(Dollars in thousands)
Low
High
Occupancy percentage for operating properties in North America as of December 31, 2015
96.9%
97.4%
Same Properties’ performance:
NOI increase
0.5%
2.5%
NOI increase (cash basis)
5.0%
7.0%
Lease renewals and re-leasing of space:
Rental rate increases
14.0%
17.0%
Rental rate increases (cash basis)
8.0%
10.0%
Straight-line rent revenue
$
47,000
$
52,000
General and administrative expenses
$
55,000
$
59,000
Capitalization of interest
$
35,000
$
45,000
Interest expense
$
106,000
$
116,000
Key Credit Metrics
Net debt to Adjusted EBITDA – fourth quarter of 2015 annualized
<7.0x
Fixed-charge coverage ratio – fourth quarter of 2015 annualized
3.0x to 3.5x
Value-creation pipeline as a percentage of gross investments in real estate as of December 31, 2015
10% to 15%
81
Key Credit Metrics
Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA
(1)
Unencumbered NOI
(2)
78%
Fixed-Charge Coverage Ratio
(1)
Liquidity
(1)
Quarter annualized.
(2)
For the three months ended June 30, 2015.
As of June 30, 2015
, we had construction in progress related to our
eight
development projects in North America. The completion of these projects, along with projects recently placed into service, certain future projects, and operations from Same Properties, is expected to contribute significant increases in rental income, NOI, and cash flows. Operating performance assumptions related to the completion of our development projects in North America, including the timing of initial occupancy, stabilization dates, and initial stabilized yield, are included in the “Value-Creation Projects and External Growth” section in Item 2 of this report.
Certain key assumptions regarding our projections, including the impact of various development and redevelopment projects, are included in the “Projected Construction Spending” table in the “Summary of Capital Expenditures” subsection of the “Value-Creation Projects and External Growth” section in Item 2 of this report.
82
The completion of our development and redevelopment projects will result in an increase in interest expense and other project costs, because these project costs will no longer qualify for capitalization and these costs will be expensed as incurred. Our projection assumptions for Same Properties’ NOI increase, rental rate increases, straight-line rents, general and administrative expenses, capitalization of interest, interest expense, and key credit metrics are included in the tables and charts above and are subject to a number of variables and uncertainties, including those discussed under the “Forward-Looking Statements” section of Part I, the “Risk Factors” section of Item 1A, and the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section under Item 7 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014
. To the extent our full-year earnings guidance is updated during the year, we will provide additional disclosure supporting reasons for any significant changes to such guidance.
Liquidity and capital resources
Overview
We expect to meet certain long-term liquidity requirements, such as requirements for development, redevelopment, other construction projects, capital improvements, tenant improvements, property acquisitions, leasing costs, non-revenue-enhancing capital expenditures, and scheduled debt maturities, through net cash provided by operating activities, periodic asset sales, strategic joint venture capital, and long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness, including borrowings under our unsecured senior line of credit, unsecured senior bank term loans, and the issuance of additional debt and/or equity securities.
We expect to continue meeting our short-term liquidity and capital requirements, as further detailed in this section, generally through our working capital and net cash provided by operating activities. We believe that the net cash provided by operating activities will continue to be sufficient to enable us to make the distributions necessary to continue qualifying as a REIT.
Over the next several years, our balance sheet, capital structure, and liquidity objectives are as follows:
•
Retain positive cash flows from operating activities after payment of dividends for reinvestment in acquisitions and/or development and redevelopment projects;
•
Maintain adequate liquidity from net cash provided by operating activities, cash and cash equivalents, and available borrowing capacity under our unsecured senior line of credit and available commitments under our secured construction loans;
•
Reduce the amount of our unsecured bank debt;
•
Maintain diverse sources of capital, including sources from net cash provided by operating activities, unsecured debt, secured debt, selective asset sales, joint venture capital, preferred stock, and common stock;
•
Manage the amount of debt maturing in a single year;
•
Mitigate unhedged variable-rate debt through the reduction of short-term and medium-term variable-rate bank debt;
•
Maintain a large unencumbered asset pool to provide financial flexibility;
•
Fund preferred stock and common stock dividends from net cash provided by operating activities;
•
Manage a disciplined level of value-creation projects as a percentage of our gross investments in real estate;
•
Maintain high levels of pre-leasing in value-creation projects; and
•
Maintain solid key credit metrics, including net debt to Adjusted EBITDA and fixed-charge coverage ratio, with some variation from quarter to quarter and from year to year.
83
Unsecured senior line of credit and unsecured senior bank term loans
The table below reflects the outstanding balances, maturity dates, applicable rates, and facility fees for each of these facilities.
Balance as of
June 30, 2015
As of June 30, 2015
Facility
Maturity Date
(1)
Applicable Rate
Facility Fee
2019 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan
$
600
million
January 2019
L+1.20%
N/A
2021 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan
$
350
million
January 2021
L+1.10%
N/A
$1.5 billion unsecured senior line of credit
$
624
million
January 2019
L+1.10%
0.20%
(1)
Includes any extension options that we control.
The maturity date of the unsecured senior line of credit is January 2019, assuming we exercise our sole right to extend the stated maturity date, twice, by an additional six months after each exercise. Borrowings under the unsecured senior line of credit bear interest at LIBOR or the base rate specified in the amended unsecured senior line of credit agreement, plus, in either case, a specified margin (“Applicable Margin”). The Applicable Margin for LIBOR borrowings under the unsecured senior line of credit is based on our existing credit rating as set by certain rating agencies. Our unsecured senior line of credit contains a feature that allows lenders to competitively bid on the interest rate for borrowings under the facility. This may result in an interest rate that is below the stated rate of LIBOR+1.10%. In addition to the Applicable Margin, our unsecured senior line of credit is subject to an annual facility fee of 0.20% based upon aggregate outstanding commitments.
The requirements of, and our actual performance with respect to, the key financial covenants under our unsecured senior line of credit and unsecured senior bank term loans as of
June 30, 2015
, were as follows:
Covenant Ratios
(1)
Requirement
Actual
(2)
Leverage Ratio
Less than or equal to 60.0%
38.1%
Secured Debt Ratio
Less than or equal to 45.0%
7.1%
Fixed-Charge Coverage Ratio
Greater than or equal to 1.50x
3.15x
Unsecured Leverage Ratio
Less than or equal to 60.0%
43.5%
Unsecured Interest Coverage Ratio
Greater than or equal to 1.50x
7.02x
(1)
For definitions of the ratios, refer to the amended unsecured senior line of credit and unsecured senior bank term loan agreements, including (i) the agreement dated as of August 30, 2013, which was filed as an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 7, 2013, and (ii) the agreement dated June 30, 2015, which is filed as an exhibit to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
(2)
Actual covenants are calculated pursuant to the specific terms of our unsecured senior line of credit and unsecured senior bank term loan agreements.
Unsecured senior notes payable
The requirements of, and our actual performance with respect to, the key financial covenants under our 2.75% unsecured senior notes (“2.75% Unsecured Senior Notes”), 3.90% unsecured senior notes (“3.90% Unsecured Senior Notes”), 4.60% unsecured senior notes (“4.60% Unsecured Senior Notes”), and 4.50% unsecured senior notes (“4.50% Unsecured Senior Notes”) as of
June 30, 2015
, were as follows:
Covenant Ratios
(1)
Requirement
Actual
Total Debt to Total Assets
Less than or equal to 60%
43%
Secured Debt to Total Assets
Less than or equal to 40%
8%
Consolidated EBITDA to Interest Expense
Greater than or equal to 1.5x
6.0x
Unencumbered Total Asset Value to Unsecured Debt
Greater than or equal to 150%
227%
(1)
For definitions of the ratios, refer to the indenture at Exhibit 4.3 and related supplemental indentures at Exhibits 4.4, 4.7, 4.9, and 4.11, which are each listed in Item 6 of this report.
In addition, the terms of the indentures, among other things, limit the ability of the Company, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, L.P., and the Company’s subsidiaries to (i) consummate a merger, or consolidate or sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, and (ii) incur certain secured or unsecured indebtedness.
84
Sources and uses of capital
We expect that our principal liquidity needs for the year ending
December 31, 2015
, will be satisfied by the following multiple sources of capital, as shown in the table below. There can be no assurance that our sources and uses of capital will not be materially higher or lower than these expectations.
Key Sources and Uses of Capital
(in thousands)
Completed During the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
2015 Guidance
Low
High
Sources of capital:
Net cash provided by operating activities after dividends
$
61,000
$
115,000
$
135,000
Incremental debt
316,000
115,000
195,000
Remainder/asset sales
(1)
94,000
720,000
820,000
Total sources of capital
$
471,000
$
950,000
$
1,150,000
Uses of capital:
Construction
$
198,000
$
600,000
$
700,000
Acquisitions
(2)
273,000
350,000
450,000
Total uses of capital
$
471,000
$
950,000
$
1,150,000
Incremental debt:
Issuance of unsecured senior and other notes payable
$
82,000
$
370,000
$
450,000
Borrowings under existing secured construction loans
43,000
80,000
130,000
Repayments of secured notes payable
(10,000
)
(61,000
)
(137,000
)
Activity on unsecured senior line of credit/other
201,000
(274,000
)
(248,000
)
Incremental debt
$
316,000
$
115,000
$
195,000
(1)
Refer to page
67
for discussion on dispositions and other sources of capital.
(2)
Includes the acquisition in July 2015, of 10290 Campus Point Drive, a property aggregating
304,326
RSF, for
$105.0 million
. See pages
50
and
66
for additional information.
The key assumptions behind the sources and uses of capital in the table above are a favorable capital market environment, performance of our core operating properties, lease-up and completion of current and future development and redevelopment projects, and leasing activity. Our expected sources and uses of capital are subject to a number of variables and uncertainties, including those discussed under the “Forward-Looking Statements” section of Part I, the “Risk Factors” section of Item 1A, and the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section under Item 7 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014
. We expect to update our forecast of sources and uses of capital on a quarterly basis.
Sources of capital
Net cash provided by operating activities after dividends
We expect to retain
$115.0 million
to
$135.0 million
of net cash flows from operating activities after payment of common stock and preferred stock dividends. For the year ending
December 31, 2015
, we expect that our highly leased value-creation projects, along with projects recently placed into service, certain future projects, and operations from Same Properties, will contribute significant increases as compared to the
year ended December 31, 2014
, in rental income, NOI, and cash flows. Refer to the “Cash Flows” section appearing elsewhere in this section of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of net cash provided by operating activities for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
.
Real estate sales
We expect to continue to sell land, non-core operating assets, high-value “core-like” operating properties, and joint venture interests in high-value operating properties located in high-barrier-to-entry submarkets. The amount of asset sales necessary to meet our forecasted sources of capital will vary depending upon the amount of EBITDA associated with the assets sold.
85
For additional information, refer to the section titled “Sales of Real Estate Assets and Related Impairment Charges” in Note 3 – “Investments in Real Estate” to our unaudited consolidated financial statements under Item 1 of this report and the “Dispositions and Other Sources of Capital” subsection of the “Value-Creation Projects and External Growth” section in Item 2 of this report. The sale of non-strategic assets in our value-creation pipeline and non-core/“core-like” operating assets provides a significant source of capital to fund our highly pre-leased value-creation development and redevelopment projects described above.
Liquidity
The following table presents the availability under our unsecured senior line of credit, secured construction loans, and cash and cash equivalents as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
Description
Stated
Rate
Total
Commitments
Outstanding
Balance
Remaining Commitments
$1.5 billion unsecured senior line of credit
LIBOR+1.10%
$
1,500,000
$
624,000
$
876,000
Secured construction loan
LIBOR+1.40%
36,000
20,631
15,369
Secured construction loan
LIBOR+1.50%
55,000
47,183
7,817
Secured construction loan
LIBOR+1.35%
250,400
147,281
103,119
$
1,841,400
$
839,095
1,002,305
Cash and cash equivalents
68,617
Total liquidity
$
1,070,922
Debt
We expect to fund a significant portion of our capital needs in 2015 from the issuance of unsecured senior notes payable, borrowings available under existing secured construction loans, an unsecured senior line of credit, new secured construction loans, and acquired secured notes payable.
In June 2015, we completed a partial principal repayment of
$25.0 million
and extended the maturity of the remaining $350.0 million 2021 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan from July 31, 2015, to June 30, 2019, subject to our option to extend the maturity up to three times upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, for an additional term of six months for the first and second extensions and for an additional term ending on January 15, 2021, for the third extension. In addition, we reduced the applicable interest rate margin with respect to borrowings outstanding under the loan to LIBOR+1.10% from LIBOR+1.20%. In conjunction with the amendment of our 2021 Unsecured Senior Bank Term Loan and the principal repayment, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt aggregating
$189 thousand
related to the write-off of a portion of unamortized loan fees.
In July 2014, we completed public offerings of $400 million in aggregate principal amount and $300 million in aggregate principal amount of unsecured senior notes payable at stated interest rates of 2.75% and 4.50%, respectively, at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.50% and a weighted-average maturity of 9.6 years. The 2.75% Unsecured Senior Notes were priced at 99.793% of the principal amount with a yield to maturity of 2.791% and are due January 15, 2020. The 4.50% Unsecured Senior Notes were priced at 99.912% of the principal amount with a yield to maturity of 4.508% and are due July 30, 2029. Both the 2.75% Unsecured Senior Notes and the 4.50% Unsecured Senior Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Alexandria Real Estate Equities, L.P., a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company. Both the 2.75% Unsecured Senior Notes and the 4.50% Unsecured Senior Notes rank equally in right of payment with all other senior unsecured indebtedness. However, the 2.75% Unsecured Senior Notes and the 4.50% Unsecured Senior Notes are subordinated to existing and future mortgages and other secured indebtedness (to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness) and to all existing and future preferred equity and liabilities, whether secured or unsecured, of the Company’s subsidiaries, other than Alexandria Real Estate Equities, L.P. Net proceeds of $694 million from the offering were used to reduce variable-rate debt, consisting of the partial repayment of $125 million of our unsecured senior bank term loan and the reduction of $569 million of borrowings outstanding on our unsecured senior line of credit. In connection with the partial repayment of $125 million of our unsecured senior bank term loan, we recognized a loss on the early extinguishment of debt related to the write-off of a portion of unamortized loan fees totaling $525 thousand.
Refer to the “Liquidity” subsection for a discussion of our secured construction loans and unsecured senior line of credit.
86
Secured construction loans
Refer to Note 6 – “Secured and Unsecured Senior Debt” to our unaudited consolidated financial statements under Item 1 of this report for a discussion of our secured construction loans.
Unsecured senior line of credit
We use our unsecured senior line of credit to fund working capital, construction activities, and, from time to time, acquisition of properties.
Borrowings under the unsecured senior line of credit will bear interest at a “Eurocurrency Rate” or a “Base Rate” specified in the amended unsecured line of credit agreement, plus, in either case, the Applicable Margin. The “Eurocurrency Rate” specified in the amended unsecured line of credit agreement is, as applicable, the rate per annum equal to (i) the LIBOR or a successor rate thereto as approved by the administrative agent for loans denominated in a LIBOR quoted currency (i.e., U.S. dollars, euro, sterling, or yen), (ii) the average annual yield rates applicable to Canadian dollar bankers’ acceptances for loans denominated in Canadian dollars, (iii) the Bank Bill Swap Reference Bid rate for loans denominated in Australian dollars, or (iv) the rate designated with respect to the applicable alternative currency for loans denominated in a non-LIBOR quoted currency (other than Canadian or Australian dollars). The Base Rate means, for any day, a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1.00%, (ii) the rate of interest in effect for such day as publicly announced from time to time by Bank of America as its “prime rate,” and (iii) the Eurocurrency Rate plus 1.00%. Our unsecured senior line of credit contains a feature that allows lenders to competitively bid on the interest rate for borrowings under the facility. This may result in an interest rate that is below the stated rate of LIBOR+
1.10%
. In addition to the cost of borrowing, the facility is subject to an annual facility fee of
0.20%
based on the aggregate commitments outstanding.
Cash and cash equivalents
As of
June 30, 2015
, and
December 31, 2014
, we had
$68.6 million
and
$86.0 million
, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents. We expect existing cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operating activities, proceeds from asset sales, borrowings under our unsecured senior line of credit, secured construction loan borrowings, issuances of unsecured notes payable, and issuances of common stock to continue to be sufficient to fund our operating activities and cash commitments for investing and financing activities, such as regular quarterly dividends, scheduled debt repayments, and certain capital expenditures, including expenditures
related to construction activities.
Restricted cash
Restricted cash consisted of the following as of
June 30, 2015
, and
December 31, 2014
(in thousands):
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Funds held in trust under the terms of certain secured notes payable
$
21,268
$
19,350
Funds held in escrow related to construction projects and investing activities
20,040
4,539
Other restricted funds
2,883
2,995
Total
$
44,191
$
26,884
The funds held in escrow related to construction projects will be used to pay for certain construction costs.
Other sources
We may issue and publicly offer common stock, preferred stock, debt, and other securities from time to time at our discretion, based on our needs and market conditions, including, as necessary, to balance our use of incremental debt capital.
We hold interests, together with certain third parties, in companies that we consolidate in our financial statements. These third parties may contribute equity into these entities primarily related to their share of funds for construction-related and financing-related activities.
87
We also hold interests, together with certain third parties, in joint ventures that are not consolidated in our financial statements. The following table presents information related to debt held by one of our unconsolidated joint ventures (dollars in thousands):
Loan Collateral
Total Commitments
Total Outstanding
Partners’ Share
ARE’s
27.5% Share
Maturity Date
Interest Rate
360 Longwood Avenue
$
213,200
$
170,531
$
123,635
$
46,896
4/1/17
(1)
5.25
%
(2)
(1)
We have two, one-year options to extend the stated maturity date to April 1, 2019, subject to certain conditions.
(2)
Secured construction loan bears interest at LIBOR+3.75%, with a floor of 5.25%.
Uses of capital
Summary of capital expenditures
Our primary use of capital relates to the development, redevelopment, predevelopment, and construction of properties. In North America, we currently have development projects in process aggregating
2.6 million
RSF, with
2.0 million
RSF of construction in progress of office/laboratory and tech office space,
includin
g two
unconsolidated joint venture develo
pment projects. We incur capitalized construction costs related to development, redevelopment, predevelopment, and other construction activities. We also incur additional capitalized project costs, including interest, property taxes, insurance, and other costs directly related and essential to the development or construction of a project. Refer to “Summary of Capital Expenditures” in Item 2 of this report for more information on our capital expenditures.
We capitalize interest cost as a cost of the project only during the period for which activities necessary to prepare an asset for its intended use are ongoing, provided that expenditures for the asset have been made and interest cost has been incurred. Capitalized interest for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
, of
$19.4 million
and
$23.3 million
, respectively, is classified in investments in real estate. Indirect project costs, including construction administration, legal fees, and office costs that clearly relate to projects under development or construction, are capitalized as incurred during the period an asset is undergoing activities to prepare it for its intended use. We capitalized payroll and other indirect project costs related to development, redevelopment, and construction projects, aggregating
$6.9 million
and
$8.9 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
, respectively. Additionally, should we cease activities necessary to prepare an asset for its intended use, the interest, taxes, insurance, and certain other direct project costs related to this asset would be expensed as incurred. When construction activities cease, the asset is classified as rental property. Also, if vertical aboveground construction is not initiated at completion of predevelopment activities, the land parcel is classified as land held for future development. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Fluctuations in our development, redevelopment, predevelopment, and construction activities could result in significant changes to total expenses and net income. For example, had we experienced a 10% reduction in development, redevelopment, and construction activities without a corresponding decrease in indirect project costs, including interest and payroll, total expenses would have increased by approximately
$2.9 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
.
We also capitalize and defer initial direct costs to originate leases with independent third parties related to evaluating a prospective lessee’s financial condition, negotiating lease terms, preparing the lease agreement, and closing the lease transaction. Costs that we capitalized and deferred relate to successful leasing transactions, result directly from and are essential to the lease transaction, and would not have been incurred had that lease transaction not occurred. The initial direct costs capitalized and deferred also include the portion of our employees’ total compensation and payroll-related fringe benefits directly related to time spent performing activities previously described and related to the respective lease that would not have been performed but for that lease. Total initial direct leasing costs capitalized during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
, were
$26.8 million
and
$19.2 million
, respectively, of which
$5.8 million
and
$6.5 million
, respectively, represented capitalized and deferred payroll costs directly related and essential to our leasing activities during such periods.
Acquisitions
Refer to the “External Growth – Acquisitions” section in Item 2 of this report.
88
Contractual obligations and commitments
Contractual obligations as of
June 30, 2015
, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Payments by Period
Total
2015
2016-2017
2018-2019
Thereafter
Secured and unsecured debt
(1) (2)
$
4,090,731
$
4,322
$
536,187
$
1,234,064
$
2,316,158
Estimated interest payments on fixed-rate and hedged variable-rate debt
(3)
687,119
56,607
193,882
166,455
270,175
Estimated interest payments on variable-rate debt
(4)
39,090
2,519
15,385
16,683
4,503
Ground lease obligations
595,120
6,338
23,459
22,376
542,947
Other obligations
7,528
744
3,047
3,737
—
Total
$
5,419,588
$
70,530
$
771,960
$
1,443,315
$
3,133,783
(1)
Amounts represent principal amounts due and exclude unamortized premiums/discounts reflected on the consolidated balance sheets.
(2)
Payment dates include any extension options that we control.
(3)
Estimated interest payments on our fixed-rate debt and hedged variable-rate debt are based upon contractual interest rates, including the impact of interest rate swap agreements, interest payment dates, and scheduled maturity dates.
(4)
The interest payments on variable-rate debt are based on the interest rates in effect as of
June 30, 2015
.
Secured notes payable
Secured notes payable
as of June 30, 2015
, consisted of
13
notes secured by
33
properties. Our secured notes payable typically require monthly payments of principal and interest and had a weighted-average interest rate of approximately
4.25%
as of June 30, 2015
. The total book values of rental properties, land held for future development, and CIP securing debt were approximately
$1.4 billion
as of June 30, 2015
.
As of June 30, 2015
, our secured notes payable, including unamortized discounts, were composed of approximately
$480.3 million
and
$291.1 million
of fixed- and variable-rate debt, respectively.
Estimated interest payments
Estimated interest payments on our fixed-rate debt and hedged variable-rate debt were calculated based upon contractual interest rates, including the impact of interest rate swap agreements, interest payment dates, and scheduled maturity dates. As of
June 30, 2015
, approximately
78%
of our debt was fixed-rate debt or variable-rate debt subject to interest rate swap agreements. Refer to Note 7 – “Interest Rate Swap Agreements” to our unaudited consolidated financial statements appearing under Item 1 of this report for further information. The remaining
22%
of our debt
as of June 30, 2015
, was unhedged variable-rate debt based primarily on LIBOR. Interest payments on our unhedged variable-rate debt have been calculated based on interest rates in effect as of
June 30, 2015
. Refer to additional information regarding our debt under Note 6 – “Secured and Unsecured Senior Debt” to our unaudited consolidated financial statements appearing under Item 1 of this report.
Interest rate swap agreements
We utilize interest rate swap agreements to hedge a portion of our exposure to variable interest rates primarily associated with our unsecured senior line of credit and unsecured senior bank term loans. These agreements involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for our payment of fixed-rate amounts to the counterparty over the life of the agreement without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. Interest received under all our interest rate swap agreements is based on the one-month LIBOR. The net difference between the interest paid and the interest received is reflected as an adjustment to interest
expense in our consolidated statements of income.
89
We have entered into master derivative agreements with each counterparty. These master derivative agreements (all of which are adapted from the standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. form) define certain terms between us and each of our counterparties to address and minimize certain risks associated with our interest rate swap agreements. In order to limit our risk of non-performance by an individual counterparty under our interest rate swap agreements, these agreements are spread among various counterparties. As of
June 30, 2015
, the largest aggregate notional amount in effect at any single point in time with an individual counterparty under our interest rate swap agreements was $250.0 million. If one or more of our counterparties fail to perform under our interest rate swap agreements, we may incur higher costs associated with our variable-rate LIBOR-based debt than the interest costs we originally anticipated. We have not posted any collateral related to our interest rate swap agreements.
Ground lease obligations
Ground lease obligations as of
June 30, 2015
, included leases for
28
of our properties, which accounted for approximately
14%
of our total number of properties and
three
land development parcels. Excluding one ground lease related to one operating property that expires in
2036
with a net book value of
$9.8 million
as of
June 30, 2015
, our ground lease obligations have remaining lease terms ranging from
40
to
100
years, including extension options.
Commitments
As of
June 30, 2015
, remaining aggregate costs under contract for the construction of properties undergoing development, redevelopment, and improvements under the terms of leases approximated
$651.6 million
. We expect payments for these obligations to occur over
one
to
three
years, subject to capital planning adjustments from time to time. We may have the ability to cease the construction of certain properties, which would result in the reduction of our commitments. We are also committed to funding approximately
$83.7 million
for certain investments over the next several years. We have one joint venture with a commitment to contribute our share of equity into this joint venture to complete the project. The additional funding commitment as of
June 30, 2015
, for this joint venture was pending completion of the final design of the building. Our other joint venture does not have a commitment to contribute additional equity. In addition, we have letters of credit and performance obligations of
$11.0 million
primarily related to our construction management requirements.
We have minimum development requirements under project development agreements with government entities for some of our future value-creation projects. As of
June 30, 2015
, we had land and land improvements with an aggregate book value of
$23.2 million
for which we had construction commitment obligations aggregating approximately
300,000
RSF and
100,000
RSF that need to be fulfilled by 2016 and 2017, respectively. The estimated cost to develop these projects is approximately
$125
to
$175
per square foot. If we do not meet, extend, or eliminate these commitments, we may default under our existing agreements. The government entities, in turn, have certain obligations to us under those project development agreements. We are working with these entities to fulfill or amend certain existing obligations in a mutually beneficial manner.
Exposure to environmental liabilities
In connection with the acquisition of all of our properties, we have obtained Phase I environmental assessments to ascertain the existence of any environmental liabilities or other issues. The Phase I environmental assessments of our properties have not revealed any environmental liabilities that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole, nor are we aware of any material environmental liabilities that have occurred since the Phase I environmental assessments were completed. In addition, we carry a policy of pollution legal liability insurance covering exposure to certain environmental losses at substantially all of our properties.
Cash flows
We report and analyze our cash flows based on operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities. The following table summarizes changes in our cash flows (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Change
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
151,400
$
144,491
$
6,909
Net cash used in investing activities
$
(316,040
)
$
(273,177
)
$
(42,863
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
$
147,119
$
131,854
$
15,265
90
Operating activities
Cash flows provided by operating activities
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
, consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Change
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
151,400
$
144,491
$
6,909
Add: changes in operating assets and liabilities
29,681
24,018
5,663
Net cash provided by operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities
$
181,081
$
168,509
$
12,572
Cash flows provided by operating activities
are primarily dependent on the occupancy level of our asset base, the rental rates of our leases, the collectability of rent and recovery of operating expenses from our client tenants, the timing of completion of development projects, the timing of completion of redevelopment projects, and the timing of acquisitions of operating properties.
Net cash provided by operating activities
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
,
increased
to
$151.4 million
, compared to
$144.5 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
.
Net cash provided by operating activities before changes in operating assets and liabilities
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
,
increased
by
$12.6 million
, or
7.5%
, to
$181.1 million
, compared to
$168.5 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
. This
increase
was primarily attributable to
an increase
in our Same Properties’ NOI (cash basis) of
$13.3 million
, or
6.2%
, to
$227.8 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, compared to
$214.5 million
for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
. In addition, the
increase
in operating cash flows was attributable to our development and redevelopment projects aggregating
1,138,483
RSF placed into service after January 1,
2014
, and operating properties aggregating
518,357
RSF that were acquired in North America after January 1,
2014
. These
increases
were partially offset by the sale of
five
non-strategic properties aggregating
259,205
RSF over the same period.
Investing activities
Cash flows used in investing activities
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Change
Proceeds from sales of real estate
$
92,455
$
17,868
$
74,587
Additions to real estate
(226,302
)
(210,792
)
(15,510
)
Purchase of real estate
(137,493
)
(97,785
)
(39,708
)
Deposits for investing activities
(15,501
)
—
(15,501
)
Additions to investments
(52,738
)
(25,358
)
(27,380
)
Sales of investments
22,474
8,794
13,680
Repayment of notes receivable
4,247
29,851
(25,604
)
Other
(3,182
)
4,245
(7,427
)
Net cash used in investing activities
$
(316,040
)
$
(273,177
)
$
(42,863
)
The change in
net cash used in investing activities
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, is primarily due to a higher use of cash for property acquisitions offset by a higher source of cash from property dispositions.
Value-creation opportunities and external growth
For information on our key development and redevelopment projects for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, refer to “Development, Redevelopment, and Future Value-Creation Projects” located earlier within Item 2 of this report.
91
Financing activities
Cash flows provided by financing activities
for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
, consisted of the following (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Change
Borrowings from secured notes payable
$
42,867
$
77,762
$
(34,895
)
Repayments of borrowings from secured notes payable
(10,075
)
(219,427
)
209,352
Borrowings from unsecured senior line of credit
915,000
637,000
278,000
Repayments of borrowings from unsecured senior line of credit
(595,000
)
(270,000
)
(325,000
)
Repayments of borrowings from unsecured senior bank term loans
(25,000
)
—
(25,000
)
Total changes related to debt
327,792
225,335
102,457
Dividend payments
(119,096
)
(111,810
)
(7,286
)
Contributions by noncontrolling interests
340
19,410
(19,070
)
Distributions to and purchases of noncontrolling interests
(61,890
)
(1,983
)
(59,907
)
Other
(27
)
902
(929
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
$
147,119
$
131,854
$
15,265
Dividends
During the
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
, we paid the following dividends (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Change
Common stock dividends
$
106,603
$
98,867
$
7,736
Series D Preferred Stock dividends
8,301
8,750
(449
)
Series E Preferred Stock dividends
4,192
4,193
(1
)
$
119,096
$
111,810
$
7,286
The increase in dividends paid on our common stock was primarily due to an increase in the related dividends to
$1.48
per common share for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, from
$1.38
per common share for the
six months ended June 30, 2014
.
Inflation
As of
June 30, 2015
, approximately
96%
of our leases (on an RSF basis) were triple net leases, requiring client tenants to pay substantially all real estate taxes, insurance, utilities, common area expenses, and other operating expenses (including increases thereto) in addition to base rent. Approximately
94%
of our leases (on an RSF basis) contained effective annual rent escalations that were either fixed (generally ranging from
3.0%
to
3.5%
) or indexed based on a consumer price index or other indices. Accordingly, we do not believe that our cash flows or earnings from real estate operations are subject to significant risks from inflation. An increase in inflation, however, could result in an increase in the cost of our variable-rate borrowings, including borrowings related to our unsecured senior line of credit and unsecured senior bank term loans.
Critical accounting policies
Refer to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014
, for a discussion of our critical accounting policies, which include rental properties; land held for future development; CIP; discontinued operations; impairment of long-lived assets; capitalization of costs; accounting for investments; interest rate swap agreements; recognition of rental income and tenant recoveries; and monitoring of client tenant credit quality. There were no significant changes to these policies during the
six months ended June 30, 2015
.
92
Non-GAAP measures
FFO and FFO, as adjusted
GAAP-basis accounting for real estate assets utilizes historical cost accounting and assumes that real estate values diminish over time. In an effort to overcome the difference between real estate values and historical cost accounting for real estate assets, the Board of Governors of the NAREIT established the measurement tool of FFO. Since its introduction, FFO has become a widely used non-GAAP financial measure among equity REITs. We believe that FFO is helpful to investors as an additional measure of the performance of an equity REIT. Moreover, we believe that FFO, as adjusted, is also helpful because it allows investors to compare our performance to the performance of other real estate companies on a consistent basis, without having to account for differences caused by investment and disposition decisions, financing decisions, terms of securities, capital structures, and capital market transactions. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors of NAREIT in its April 2002 White Paper and related implementation guidance (“NAREIT White Paper”). The NAREIT White Paper defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) from sales of depreciable real estate and land parcels and impairments of depreciable real estate (excluding land parcels), plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Impairments of real estate relate to decreases in the fair value of real estate due to changes in general market conditions and do not necessarily reflect the operating performance of the properties during the corresponding period. Impairments of real estate represent the write-down of assets when fair value over the recoverability period is less than the carrying value. We compute FFO, as adjusted, as FFO calculated in accordance with the NAREIT White Paper, plus losses on early extinguishment of debt, preferred stock redemption charges, impairments of real estate – land parcels, impairments of investments, and the amount of such items that is allocable to our unvested restricted stock awards. Our calculations of both FFO and FFO, as adjusted, may differ from those methodologies utilized by other equity REITs for similar performance measurements and, accordingly, may not be comparable to those of other equity REITs. Our computation of FFO, as adjusted, further adds back impairment write-downs of non-depreciable real estate. Neither FFO nor FFO, as adjusted, should be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of financial performance, or to cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of liquidity, nor are they indicative of the availability of funds for our cash needs, including funds available to make distributions.
AFFO
AFFO is a non-GAAP financial measure that we use as a supplemental measure of our performance. We compute AFFO by adding to or deducting from FFO, as adjusted: (i) non-revenue-enhancing building improvements (excluding amounts recoverable from our client tenants), non-revenue-enhancing tenant improvements and leasing commissions (excluding revenue-enhancing and development and redevelopment expenditures); (ii) effects of straight-line rent revenue and straight-line rent expense on ground leases; (iii) capitalized income from development projects; (iv) amortization of acquired above- and below-market leases, loan fees, and debt premiums/discounts; (v) stock compensation expense; and (vi) allocation of AFFO attributable to unvested restricted stock awards.
We believe that AFFO is a useful supplemental performance measure because it further adjusts FFO to (i) deduct certain expenditures that, although capitalized and classified in depreciation expense, do not enhance the revenue or cash flows of our properties; (ii) eliminate the effect of straight-lining our rental income and capitalizing income from development projects; and (iii) eliminate the effect of items that are not indicative of our core operations and that do not actually reduce the amount of cash generated by our operations. We believe that eliminating the effect of charges related to share-based compensation facilitates a comparison of our operations across periods and among other equity REITs without the variances caused by different valuation methodologies, the volatility of the expense (which depends on market forces outside our control), and the assumptions and the variety of award types that a company can use. We believe that AFFO provides useful information by excluding certain items that are not representative of our core operating results because such items are dependent upon historical costs or subject to judgmental valuation inputs and the timing of our decisions.
AFFO is not intended to represent cash flow for the period, and is intended only to provide an additional measure of performance. We believe that net income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders is the GAAP financial measure most comparable to AFFO. We believe that AFFO is a widely recognized measure of the operations of equity REITs, and presenting AFFO will enable investors to assess our performance in comparison to other equity REITs. However, other equity REITs may use different methodologies for calculating AFFO, and accordingly, our AFFO may not be comparable to AFFO calculated by other equity REITs. AFFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of financial performance, or to cash flows from operating activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions.
93
The following table presents a reconciliation of net income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – basic, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, to FFO attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – basic, FFO attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – diluted, as adjusted, and AFFO attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – diluted, for the periods below. Amounts in the table below include our share of unconsolidated joint venture amounts.
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)
2015
2014
2015
2014
Net income attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders
$
31,291
$
27,932
$
49,077
$
60,641
Depreciation and amortization
62,523
57,314
121,725
107,735
Impairment of real estate – rental properties
—
—
14,510
—
Gain on sales of real estate – land parcels
—
(797
)
—
(797
)
Amount attributable to noncontrolling interests/
unvested restricted stock awards:
Net income
893
1,712
1,868
3,281
FFO
(1,274
)
(1,648
)
(2,415
)
(3,277
)
FFO attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – basic and diluted
(1)
93,433
84,513
184,765
167,583
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
189
—
189
—
Allocation to unvested restricted stock awards
(2
)
—
(2
)
—
FFO attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders –
diluted, as adjusted
93,620
84,513
184,952
167,583
Non-revenue-enhancing capital expenditures:
Building improvements
(2,743
)
(1,255
)
(5,021
)
(3,035
)
Tenant improvements and leasing commissions
(6,429
)
(3,934
)
(12,204
)
(7,987
)
Straight-line rent revenue
(14,159
)
(2)
(12,737
)
(24,856
)
(24,619
)
Straight-line rent expense on ground leases
510
697
873
1,408
Amortization of acquired below-market leases
(1,006
)
(618
)
(1,939
)
(1,434
)
Amortization of loan fees
2,921
2,743
5,756
5,304
Amortization of debt (premiums) discounts
(100
)
(69
)
(182
)
136
Stock compensation expense
4,054
3,076
7,744
6,304
Allocation to unvested restricted stock awards
152
90
272
184
AFFO attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – diluted
$
76,820
$
72,506
$
155,395
$
143,844
(1)
Calculated in accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors of the NAREIT in its April 2002 White Paper and related implementation guidance.
(2)
Increase in straight-line rent revenue in the second quarter of 2015 compared to the first quarter of 2015 is primarily due to the completion of the development of 75/125 Binney Street located in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on March 24, 2015. Straight-line rent is expected to decline quarter to quarter through the remainder of 2015.
94
The following table presents a reconciliation of earnings per share attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – basic, to FFO per share attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – diluted, FFO per share attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – diluted, as adjusted, and AFFO per share attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – diluted, for the periods below. Amounts in the table below include our share of unconsolidated joint venture amounts.
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Earnings per share attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – basic and diluted
$
0.44
$
0.39
$
0.69
$
0.85
Depreciation and amortization
0.87
0.81
1.70
1.52
Impairment of real estate – rental properties
—
—
0.20
—
Gain on sales of real estate – land parcels
—
(0.01
)
—
(0.01
)
FFO per share attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – basic and diluted
(1)
and diluted, as adjusted
1.31
1.19
2.59
2.36
Non-revenue-enhancing capital expenditures:
Building improvements
(0.04
)
(0.02
)
(0.07
)
(0.04
)
Tenant improvements and leasing commissions
(0.09
)
(0.06
)
(0.17
)
(0.11
)
Straight-line rent revenue
(0.20
)
(0.18
)
(0.35
)
(0.35
)
Straight-line rent expense on ground leases
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
Amortization of acquired below-market leases
(0.01
)
(0.01
)
(0.02
)
(0.02
)
Amortization of loan fees
0.04
0.04
0.08
0.07
Stock compensation expense
0.06
0.05
0.11
0.09
AFFO per share attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – diluted
$
1.08
$
1.02
$
2.18
$
2.02
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding for calculating FFO, FFO, as adjusted, and AFFO per share attributable to Alexandria’s common stockholders – basic and diluted
71,412
71,126
71,389
71,100
(1)
Calculated in accordance with standards established by the Board of Governors of the NAREIT in its April 2002 White Paper and related implementation guidance.
95
Adjusted EBITDA
EBITDA represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and is used by us and others as a supplemental measure of performance. We use Adjusted EBITDA to assess the performance of our core operations, for financial and operational decision making, and as a supplemental or additional means of evaluating period-to-period comparisons on a consistent basis. Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as EBITDA, excluding stock compensation expense, gains or losses on early extinguishment of debt, gains or losses on sales of real estate, deal costs, and impairments (“Adjusted EBITDA”). We believe Adjusted EBITDA provides investors relevant and useful information because it permits investors to view income from our operations on an unleveraged basis before the effects of taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock compensation expense, gains or losses on early extinguishment of debt, gains or losses on sales of real estate, and impairments, including our share from our unconsolidated joint ventures. By excluding interest expense and gains or losses on early extinguishment of debt, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA allow investors to measure our performance independent of our capital structure and indebtedness and, therefore, allow for a more meaningful comparison of our performance to that of other companies, both in the real estate industry and in other industries. We believe that excluding charges related to share-based compensation facilitates a comparison of our operations across periods and among other equity REITs without the variances caused by different valuation methodologies, the volatility of the expense (which depends on market forces outside our control), and the assumptions and the variety of award types that a company can use. We believe that adjusting for the effects of gains or losses on sales of real estate and land parcels, deal costs, and impairments provides useful information by excluding certain items that are not representative of our core operating results. These items are dependent upon historical costs and are subject to judgmental inputs and the timing of our decisions. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as measures of our performance. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our historical cash expenditures or future cash requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments. While EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are relevant and widely used measures of performance, they do not represent net income or cash flows from operations as defined by GAAP, and they should not be considered as alternatives to those indicators in evaluating performance or liquidity. Further, our computation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies.
The following table reconciles net income, the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Net income
$
38,430
$
36,116
$
63,438
$
76,865
Interest expense:
Consolidated
26,668
17,433
49,904
36,556
Our share of unconsolidated joint ventures
38
—
42
—
Interest expense
26,706
17,433
49,946
36,556
Income taxes
1,324
—
2,446
—
Depreciation and amortization:
Consolidated
62,171
57,314
121,091
107,735
Our share of unconsolidated joint ventures
352
—
634
—
Depreciation and amortization
62,523
57,314
121,725
107,735
EBITDA
128,983
110,863
237,555
221,156
Stock compensation expense
4,054
3,076
7,744
6,304
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
189
—
189
—
Gain on sales of real estate – land parcels
—
(797
)
—
(797
)
Impairment of real estate
—
—
14,510
—
Adjusted EBITDA
$
133,226
$
113,142
$
259,998
$
226,663
96
Adjusted EBITDA margins
We calculate Adjusted EBITDA margins by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total revenues. Because our total revenues exclude revenues from discontinued operations, for the purposes of calculating the margin ratio, we exclude the Adjusted EBITDA generated by our discontinued operations for each period presented. We believe excluding Adjusted EBITDA for discontinued operations improves the consistency and comparability of the Adjusted EBITDA margins from period to period. The following table reconciles Adjusted EBITDA to Adjusted EBITDA – excluding discontinued operations (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Adjusted EBITDA
$
133,226
$
113,142
$
259,998
$
226,663
Add back: operating loss from discontinued operations
—
147
43
309
Adjusted EBITDA – excluding discontinued operations
$
133,226
$
113,289
$
260,041
$
226,972
Revenues:
Consolidated
$
204,156
$
176,402
$
400,909
$
352,588
Our share of unconsolidated joint ventures
1,324
—
1,324
—
Revenues
$
205,480
$
176,402
$
402,233
$
352,588
Adjusted EBITDA margins
65%
64%
65%
64%
97
Fixed-charge coverage ratio
The fixed-charge coverage ratio is the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges. This ratio is useful to investors as a supplemental measure of our ability to satisfy financing obligations and preferred stock dividends. Cash interest is equal to interest expense calculated in accordance with GAAP, plus capitalized interest and unconsolidated joint venture cash interest, less amortization of loan fees and amortization of debt premiums/discounts. The fixed-charge coverage ratio calculation below is not directly comparable to the computation of “Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends” included in Exhibit 12.1 to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, and on our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014
.
The following table presents a reconciliation of interest expense, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to cash interest and fixed charges (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Adjusted EBITDA
$
133,226
$
113,142
$
259,998
$
226,663
Interest expense
$
26,706
$
17,433
$
49,946
$
36,556
Capitalized interest:
Consolidated
8,437
11,302
19,408
23,315
Our share of unconsolidated joint ventures
617
—
1,205
—
Capitalized interest
9,054
11,302
20,613
23,315
Amortization of loan fees:
Consolidated
(2,889
)
(2,743
)
(5,723
)
(5,304
)
Our share of unconsolidated joint ventures
(32
)
—
(33
)
—
Amortization of loan fees
(2,921
)
(2,743
)
(5,756
)
(5,304
)
Amortization of debt premiums (discounts)
100
69
182
(136
)
Cash interest
32,939
26,061
64,985
54,431
Dividends on preferred stock
6,246
6,472
12,493
12,943
Fixed charges
$
39,185
$
32,533
$
77,478
$
67,374
Fixed-charge coverage ratio:
– period annualized
3.4x
3.5x
3.4x
3.4x
– trailing 12 months
3.3x
3.2x
3.3x
3.2x
98
Net debt to Adjusted EBITDA
Net debt to Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe is useful to investors as a supplemental measure in evaluating our balance sheet leverage. Net debt is equal to the sum of total consolidated debt less cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash. See “Adjusted EBITDA” for further information on the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA.
The following table summarizes the calculation of net debt to Adjusted EBITDA as of
June 30, 2015
, and
December 31, 2014
(dollars in thousands):
As of
As of
June 30, 2015
December 31, 2014
Secured notes payable:
Consolidated
$
771,435
$
652,209
Our share of unconsolidated joint ventures
46,896
—
Secured notes payable
818,331
652,209
Unsecured senior notes payable
1,747,531
1,747,370
Unsecured senior line of credit
624,000
304,000
Unsecured senior bank term loans
950,000
975,000
Cash and cash equivalents:
Consolidated
(68,617
)
(86,011
)
Our share of unconsolidated joint ventures
(4,006
)
—
Cash and cash equivalents
(72,623
)
(86,011
)
Less: restricted cash
(44,191
)
(26,884
)
Net debt
$
4,023,048
$
3,565,684
Adjusted EBITDA:
– quarter annualized
$
532,904
$
493,432
– trailing 12 months
$
501,827
$
468,492
Net debt to Adjusted EBITDA:
– quarter annualized
7.5
x
7.2
x
– trailing 12 months
8.0
x
7.6
x
NOI
NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to income from continuing operations, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, excluding loss on early extinguishment of debt, impairment of real estate, depreciation and amortization, interest expense, and general and administrative expense, including our share from our unconsolidated joint ventures. We believe NOI provides useful information to investors regarding our financial condition and results of operations because it primarily reflects those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level. Therefore, we believe NOI is a useful measure for evaluating the operating performance of our real estate assets. NOI on a cash basis is NOI, adjusted to exclude the effect of straight-line rent adjustments required by GAAP. We believe that NOI on a cash basis is helpful to investors as an additional measure of operating performance because it eliminates straight-line rent adjustments to rental revenue.
99
Further, we believe NOI is useful to investors as a performance measure because when compared across periods, NOI reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, and operating costs, which provides perspective not immediately apparent from income from continuing operations. NOI can be used to measure the initial stabilized yields of our properties by calculating the quotient of NOI generated by a property on a straight-line basis, and our investment in the property, excluding the impact of leverage. NOI excludes certain components from income from continuing operations in order to provide results that are more closely related to the results of operations of our properties. For example, interest expense is not necessarily linked to the operating performance of a real estate asset and is often incurred at the corporate level rather than at the property level. In addition, depreciation and amortization, because of historical cost accounting and useful life estimates, may distort operating performance at the property level. Impairments of real estate have been excluded in deriving NOI because we do not consider impairments of real estate to be property-level operating expenses. Impairments of real estate relate to changes in the values of our assets and do not reflect the current operating performance with respect to related revenues or expenses. Our impairments of real estate represent the write-down in the value of the assets to the estimated fair value less cost to sell. These impairments result from investing decisions and the deterioration in market conditions that adversely impact underlying real estate values. Our calculation of NOI also excludes charges incurred from changes in certain financing decisions, such as losses on early extinguishment of debt, as these charges often relate to the timing of corporate strategy. Property operating expenses that are included in determining NOI consist of costs that are related to our operating properties, such as utilities, repairs and maintenance; rental expense related to ground leases; contracted services, such as janitorial, engineering, and landscaping; property taxes and insurance; and property-level salaries. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of accounting and corporate compensation, corporate insurance, professional fees, office rent, and office supplies that are incurred as part of corporate office management. NOI presented by us may not be comparable to NOI reported by other equity REITs that define NOI differently. We believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our operating results, NOI should be examined in conjunction with income from continuing operations as presented in our consolidated statements of income. NOI should not be considered as an alternative to income from continuing operations as an indication of our performance, or as an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity or our ability to make distributions.
Same Properties’ NOI
See discussion of Same Properties and reconciliation of NOI to income from continuing operations in the “Results of Operations” section earlier in Item 2 of this report.
Unencumbered NOI as a percentage of total NOI from continuing operations
Unencumbered NOI as a percentage of total NOI from continuing operations is a non-GAAP financial measure that we believe is useful to investors as a performance measure of the results of operations of our unencumbered real estate assets, as it primarily reflects those income and expense items that are incurred at the unencumbered property level. We use unencumbered NOI as a percentage of total NOI from continuing operations, including our share from unconsolidated joint ventures, in order to assess our compliance with our financial covenants under our debt obligations, because the measure serves as a proxy for a financial measure under such debt obligations. Unencumbered NOI is derived from assets classified in continuing operations, including our share from unconsolidated joint ventures, that are not subject to any mortgage, deed of trust, lien, or other security interest as of the period for which income is presented. See the reconciliation of NOI to income from continuing operations in the “Results of Operations” section earlier in Item 2 of this report.
The following table summarizes unencumbered NOI as a percentage of total NOI for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2015
and
2014
(dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Unencumbered NOI
$
110,820
$
103,951
$
222,777
$
207,047
Encumbered NOI
32,017
20,098
56,450
40,681
NOI from continuing operations
$
142,837
$
124,049
$
279,227
$
247,728
Unencumbered NOI as a percentage of total NOI
78%
84%
80%
84%
100
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest rate risk
The primary market risk to which we believe we are exposed is interest rate risk, which may result from many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations, and other factors that are beyond our control.
In order to modify and manage the interest rate characteristics of our outstanding debt and to limit the effects of interest rate risks on our operations, we may utilize a variety of financial instruments, including interest rate swap agreements, caps, floors, and other interest rate exchange contracts. The use of these types of instruments to hedge a portion of our exposure to changes in interest rates carries additional risks, such as counterparty credit risk and the legal enforceability of hedging contracts.
Our future earnings and fair values relating to financial instruments are primarily dependent upon prevalent market rates of interest, such as LIBOR. However, our interest rate swap agreements are intended to reduce the effects of interest rate changes. The following table illustrates the effect of a 1% change in interest rates, assuming a LIBOR floor of 0%, on our variable-rate debt, including our unsecured senior line of credit and unsecured senior bank term loans, after considering the effect of our interest rate swap agreements, secured debt, and unsecured senior notes payable as of
June 30, 2015
(in thousands):
Annualized impact to future earnings due to variable-rate debt:
Rate increase of 1%
$
(7,151
)
Rate decrease of 1%
$
1,334
Effect on fair value of total consolidated debt and interest rate swap agreements:
Rate increase of 1%
$
(151,979
)
Rate decrease of 1%
$
148,847
These amounts are determined by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing cost and our interest rate swap agreements in existence on
June 30, 2015
. These analyses do not consider the effects of the reduced level of overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such magnitude, we would consider taking actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. However, because of the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analyses assume no changes in our capital structure.
Equity price risk
We have exposure to equity price market risk because of our equity investments in certain publicly traded companies and privately held entities. We classify investments in publicly traded companies as “available for sale” and consequently recognize them in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Investments in privately held entities are generally accounted for under the cost method because we do not influence any of the operating or financial policies of the entities in which we invest. For all investments, we recognize other-than-temporary declines in value against earnings in the same period during which the decline in value was deemed to have occurred. There is no assurance that future declines in value will not have a material adverse impact on our future results of operations. The following table illustrates the effect that a 10% change in the fair value of our equity investments would have on earnings as of
June 30, 2015
(in thousands):
Equity price risk:
Fair value increase of 10%
$
36,061
Fair value decrease of 10%
$
(36,061
)
101
Foreign currency exchange rate risk
We have exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk related to our subsidiaries operating in Canada and Asia. The functional currencies of our foreign subsidiaries are the respective local currencies. Gains or losses resulting from the translation of our foreign subsidiaries’ balance sheets and statements of income are classified in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of total equity. Gains or losses will be reflected in our statements of income when there is a sale or partial sale of our investment in these operations or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of the investment. The following table illustrates the effect that a 10% change in foreign currency rates relative to the U.S. dollar would have on our potential future earnings, and the fair value of our net investment in foreign subsidiaries based on our current operating assets outside the U.S. as of
June 30, 2015
(in thousands):
Impact of potential future earnings due to foreign currency exchange rate:
Rate increase of 10%
$
17
Rate decrease of 10%
$
(17
)
Effect on the fair value of net investment in foreign subsidiaries due to foreign currency exchange rate:
Rate increase of 10%
$
25,528
Rate decrease of 10%
$
(25,528
)
This sensitivity analysis assumes a parallel shift of all foreign currency exchange rates with respect to the U.S. dollar; however, foreign currency exchange rates do not typically move in such a manner and actual results may differ materially.
Our exposure to market risk elements for the
six months ended June 30, 2015
, was consistent with the risk elements presented above, including the effects of changes in interest rates, equity prices, and foreign currency exchange rates.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
As of
June 30, 2015
, we had performed an evaluation, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. These controls and procedures have been designed to ensure that information required for disclosure is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the requisite time periods. Based on our evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
June 30, 2015
.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended
June 30, 2015
, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
102
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to the information set forth in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, one should also carefully review and consider the information contained in our other reports and periodic filings that we make with the SEC, including, without limitation, the information contained under the caption “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014
. Those risk factors could materially affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The risks that we describe in our public filings are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we presently deem to be immaterial, also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
103
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Title
3.1*
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 14, 1997.
3.2*
Certificate of Correction of the Company, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 14, 1997.
3.3*
Bylaws of the Company (as amended May 7, 2015), filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 11, 2015.
3.4*
Articles Supplementary, dated June 9, 1999, relating to the 9.50% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 13, 1999.
3.5*
Articles Supplementary, dated February 10, 2000, relating to the election to be subject to Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the Maryland General Corporation Law, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 10, 2000.
3.6*
Articles Supplementary, dated February 10, 2000, relating to the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 10, 2000.
3.7*
Articles Supplementary, dated January 18, 2002, relating to the 9.10% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-A for registration of certain classes of securities filed with the SEC on January 18, 2002.
3.8*
Articles Supplementary, dated June 22, 2004, relating to the 8.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-A for registration of certain classes of securities filed with the SEC on June 28, 2004.
3.9*
Articles Supplementary, dated March 25, 2008, relating to the 7.00% Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 25, 2008.
3.10*
Articles Supplementary, dated March 12, 2012, relating to the 6.45% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2012.
4.1*
Specimen certificate representing shares of common stock, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 5, 2011.
4.2*
Specimen certificate representing shares of 7.00% Series D Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 25, 2008.
4.3*
Indenture, dated as of February 29, 2012, among the Company, as Issuer, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, L.P., as Guarantor, and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2012.
4.4*
Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of February 29, 2012, among the Company, as Issuer, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, L.P., as Guarantor, and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2012.
4.5*
Form of 4.60% Senior Note due 2022 (included in Exhibit 4.4 above).
4.6*
Specimen certificate representing shares of 6.45% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-A for registration of certain classes of securities filed with the SEC on March 12, 2012.
4.7*
Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of June 7, 2013, among the Company, as Issuer, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, L.P., as Guarantor, and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 7, 2013.
4.8*
Form of 3.90% Senior Note due 2023 (included in Exhibit 4.7 above).
4.9*
Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of July 18, 2014, among the Company, as Issuer, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, L.P., as Guarantor, and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 18, 2014.
4.10*
Form of 2.750% Senior Note due 2020 (included in Exhibit 4.9 above).
4.11*
Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of July 18, 2014, among the Company, as Issuer, Alexandria Real Estate Equities, L.P., as Guarantor, and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 18, 2014.
4.12*
Form of 4.500% Senior Note due 2029 (included in Exhibit 4.11 above).
104
10.1*
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2015, by and between the Company and Joel S. Marcus, filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 7, 2015.
10.2
Third Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, among the Company, as Borrower,
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, L.P., as Guarantor, Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Royal Bank of Canada
and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Co-Syndication Agents, Compass Bank, Regions Bank, MUFG Union Bank, N.A.,
SunTrust Bank, TD Bank, N.A., Mizuho Bank (USA) and PNC Bank National Association, as Co-Documentation
Agents, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., RBC Capital Markets, and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Joint Lead
Arrangers and Joint Book Running Managers.
12.1
Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends.
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.0
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101
The following materials from the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2015, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015, and December 31, 2014 (unaudited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited), (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Noncontrolling Interests for the six months ended June 30, 2015 (unaudited), (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (unaudited), and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited).
(*) Incorporated by reference.
105
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on
July 29, 2015
.
ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, INC.
/s/ Joel S. Marcus
Joel S. Marcus
Chairman/Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Dean A. Shigenaga
Dean A. Shigenaga
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
106