UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
For the quarterly period ended March 25, 2006
or
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-20242
CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY
1340 Treat Blvd., Suite 600, Walnut Creek, California 94597
(Address of principle executive offices)
(925) 948-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock Outstanding as of April 16, 2006
Class B Stock Outstanding as of April 16, 2006
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 1A.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
This Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions, our competitive strengths and weaknesses, our business strategy and the trends we anticipate in the industries and economies in which we operate and other information that is not historical information. When used in this Form 10-Q, the words “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “plans,” “intends,” “believes” and variations of such words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, our examination of historical operating trends, are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith, and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them, but we cannot assure you that our expectations, beliefs and projections will be realized.
There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements we make in this Form 10-Q are set forth in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 24, 2005, including the factors described in the section entitled “Risk Factors.” If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if any of our underlying assumptions are incorrect, our actual results may differ significantly from the results that we express in or imply by any of our forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances. Presently known risk factors include, but are not limited to, the following factors:
2
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
March 25,
2006
Current assets:
Cash and equivalents
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $11,712 and $12,834)
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other
Total current assets
Land, buildings, improvements and equipment—net
Goodwill
Deferred income taxes and other assets
Total
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses
Current portion of long-term debt
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt
Other long-term obligations
Convertible redeemable preferred stock
Shareholders’ equity:
Class B stock, $.01 par value: 1,654,462 and 1,652,262 shares outstanding at September 24, 2005 and March 25, 2006
Common stock, $.01 par value: 33,419,556 shares issued and 19,659,691 and 21,702,674 shares outstanding at September 24, 2005 and March 25, 2006
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Deferred compensation
Treasury stock
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Total shareholders’ equity
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
March 26,
2005
Net sales
Cost of goods sold and occupancy
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Income from operations
Interest expense
Interest income
Other income
Income before income taxes
Income taxes
Net income
Income per common share:
Basic
Diluted
Weighted average shares used in the computation of income per common share:
5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Stock based compensation
Deferred income taxes
Change in assets and liabilities (excluding businesses acquired):
Receivables
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Net cash used in operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to land, buildings, improvements and equipment
Businesses acquired, net of cash acquired
Escrow account deposit
Restricted investments
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings on revolving line of credit
Repayments of revolving line of credit
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
Repayments of long-term debt
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
Excess tax benefits from stock based awards
Deferred financing costs
Treasury stock repurchases
Net cash provided by financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents
Net decrease in cash and equivalents
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and equivalents at end of period
Supplemental information:
Cash paid for interest
Cash paid for income taxes—net
6
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Three and Six Months Ended March 25, 2006
The condensed consolidated balance sheets of Central Garden & Pet Company and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Central”) as of March 25, 2006, the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended March 26, 2005 and March 25, 2006 and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended March 26, 2005 and March 25, 2006 have been prepared by the Company, without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the periods mentioned above, have been made.
For the Company’s foreign business in the UK, the local currency is the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated using the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for the period. Comprehensive income was $27.7 million for the six month period ended March 25, 2006 and includes net earnings of $28.8 million and foreign currency translation adjustments of $1.1 million that are excluded from net earnings but reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Deferred taxes are not provided on translation gains and losses, because the Company expects earnings of its foreign subsidiary to be permanently reinvested. Transaction gains and losses are included in results of operations.
Due to the seasonal nature of the Company’s garden business, the results of operations for the three and six month periods ended March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005 are not indicative of the operating results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual audited financial statements, accounting policies and financial notes thereto, included in the Company’s 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which has previously been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Company has various non-qualified stock-based compensation programs, which provide for stock option grants and restricted stock awards. The grant date fair value of restricted stock awards is amortized over the vesting period. Stock options may be granted to officers, key employees and directors. Stock options granted are generally exercisable with a 30 month cliff vesting and 42 month expiration, but are also granted with vesting increments of 20% per year beginning three years from the date of grant and expiring 8 years from the date of grant. Prior to fiscal 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations and provided the required pro forma disclosures of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
Beginning in fiscal 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” and elected to adopt the standard using the modified prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost associated with stock options recognized in fiscal 2006 includes: (1) amortization related to the remaining unvested portion of all share based payments granted prior to, but not vested as of September 24, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original pro forma footnote disclosure provisions of FASB Statement No. 123 and (2) amortization related to all share based payments granted subsequent to September 24, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 123 (R). Accordingly, stock compensation award expense is recognized over the requisite service period using the straight-line attribution method. Previously reported amounts have not been restated.
The Company recognized share based compensation expense of $1.4 million and $2.5 million for the three and six month periods ended March 25, 2006, respectively, as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. Stock compensation cost in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 consisted of $1.1 million for stock options and $0.3 million for restricted stock awards.
7
Had compensation expense for the Company’s various stock option plans been determined based upon the projected fair values at the grant dates for awards under those plans in accordance with SFAS No. 123, the Company’s pro-forma net earnings, basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and six month periods ended March 26, 2005 would have been as follows:
Net income, as reported
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for awards, net of related tax effects
Pro forma net income
Net income per common equivalent share:
Basic – as reported
Basic – pro forma
Diluted – as reported
Diluted – pro forma
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Expected stock price volatilities are estimated based on the Company’s implied historical volatility. The expected term of options granted is based on analyses of historical employee termination rates and option exercises. The risk-free rates are based on U.S. Treasury yields, for notes with comparable terms as the option grants, in effect at the time of the grant. For purposes of this valuation model, no dividends have been assumed. Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model are presented below:
Six Months Ended
Stock plans:
Average expected life in years
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
The following table summarizes option activity for the six months ended March 25, 2006:
Outstanding at September 24, 2005
Granted
Exercised
Cancelled or expired
Outstanding at March 25, 2006
Exercisable at March 25, 2006
The weighted average fair value of options granted during the six months ended March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005 was $13.62 and $8.54, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005 was $6.2 million and $13.9 million, respectively.
8
As of March 25, 2006, there was $8.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.4 years.
Restricted Stock Awards: As of March 25, 2006, there were 0.3 million shares of restricted stock awards outstanding. The awards generally vest in 20% or 25% increments over a seven year period of employment after the grant date.
Restricted stock award activity during the six months ended March 25, 2006 is summarized as follows:
The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock awards granted during the first six months of fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 was $47.81 and $36.74, respectively.
As of March 25, 2006, there was $9.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.8 years.
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per share computations for income from continuing operations:
Basic EPS:
Effect of dilutive securities:
Options to purchase common stock
Restricted shares
Convertible preferred stock
Diluted EPS:
Net income attributable to common shareholders
9
Options to purchase 1,952,103 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $12.80 to $53.71 per share were outstanding at March 25, 2006 and options to purchase 1,996,946 shares of common stock at prices ranging from $7.54 to $45.45 per share were outstanding at March 26, 2005. For the three month periods ended March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005, options to purchase 14,500 and 22,480 shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive. For the six month periods ended March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005, options to purchase 52,584 and 23,480 shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Shares of common stock from the assumed conversion of the Company’s convertible preferred stock, issued in February 2004, were also included in the computation of diluted EPS for the three and six month periods ended March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005.
Other Assets include unallocated business acquisition costs of approximately $300 million because the Company has not yet finalized its allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired for these acquisitions, and $16 million of cash deposited into an escrow account in connection with one acquisition (see Note 7 “Acquisitions”).
On February 28, 2006, the Company arranged $650 million in senior secured credit facilities to finance the acquisition of Farnam Companies, Inc. and to refinance the existing $125 million revolving credit facility maturing in May 2008 and the existing $175 million term loan maturing in May 2009. The new credit facilities consist of a $350 million revolving credit facility maturing in February 2011 and a $300 million term loan maturing in September 2012. Interest on the revolving credit facility is based on a rate equal to prime plus a margin, which fluctuates from 0% to 0.25% or LIBOR plus a margin which fluctuates from 0.75% to 1.375%, determined quarterly based on consolidated total debt to consolidated EBITDA for the most recent trailing 12-month period. Interest on the term loan is based on a rate equal to LIBOR + 1.50% or the prime rate plus 0.50%, at the Company’s option. The term loan is payable in quarterly installments of $750,000 with the balance payable in September 2012. This facility is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets, contains certain financial covenants which require the Company to maintain minimum levels of interest coverage and maximum levels of total debt to EBITDA, and which restrict the Company’s ability to repurchase the Company’s stock, make investments in or acquisitions of other businesses and pay dividends above certain levels over the life of the facility.
In March, 2006, the Company issued 1,975,000 shares of common stock at an offering price per share of $53.50. The offering raised approximately $105 million in net proceeds.
Effective December 14, 2005, the Company retired all of its treasury stock, which consisted of 13,759,865 common shares. Upon retirement, the excess of the aggregate treasury stock purchase price over par value was allocated to additional paid-in capital.
10
In March 2006, the Company increased its equity interest in Tech Pac, L.L.C. from 20% to 80%. The Company paid approximately $21 million in cash and deposited approximately $16 million in cash in an escrow account for possible contingent performance based payments over the next five years (both amounts are included in Other Assets). The Company previously acquired its 20% interest in Tech Pac upon its acquisition of Gulfstream Home & Garden, Inc. which held a 20% interest in Tech Pac at the time of the acquisition in February 2005. Tech Pac is a leading supplier of insect control branded products in the lawn and garden market place. Tech Pac’s leading brands include Sevin®, a broad-based insecticide, Over’nOut!® for fire ant control and RooTone a leading root stimulant for the gardening enthusiast. The Company has not yet finalized its allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired. The financial statements have not been fully consolidated with the Company as of March 25, 2006, and our results of operations reflect only our 20% share in Tech Pac’s operating results. Certain purchase accounting entries yet to be finalized will impact operating results included in our consolidated results in the future.
In February 2006, the Company acquired Farnam Companies, Inc., for approximately $287 million in cash, plus $4 million in cash for the purchase of related real property. Farnam is a leading manufacturer and marketer of innovative health care products primarily for horses, household pets and livestock sold through over-the-counter and veterinary channels. In addition to the internationally recognized Farnam umbrella brand, Farnam’s portfolio of industry leading brands includes Equicare®, ComboCare™, IverCare™, and Repel-X® for horses; D-Worm™, BioSpot® and Scratchex® for household pets; and Adams™ and Bite Free™ insect controls for home and yard care. In its fiscal year ending November 30, 2005, Farnam had net sales of approximately $160 million. The purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net tangible assets acquired by approximately $230 million, which is presently included in Other Assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheet since the Company has not yet finalized its allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of intangible assets acquired. The consolidated financial statements include the results of Farnam from the date of acquisition. The final allocation of the purchase price to intangible assets may result in an adjustment of operating results recognized to date.
In February 2006, the Company acquired the assets of Breeder’s Choice Pet Foods Inc., for approximately $25 million in cash. Breeder’s Choice is a leading branded marketer and manufacturer of premium all natural, healthy dog and cat food sold exclusively in the pet specialty channel under the brands AvoDerm®, Pinnacle®, Active Care® and Advanced Pet Diets®. The Company has not yet finalized its allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired. The operating results of Breeder’s Choice have not been included in the consolidated financial statements, and the purchase price paid is included in Other Assets.
In December 2005, the Company acquired certain intellectual property assets from Shirlo, Inc. for approximately $10 million in cash. The assets acquired from Shirlo, Inc. include the company’s exclusive marketing rights to etofenprox, an insect adulticide approved for on-animal use. The acquired assets were combined with Wellmark International, a wholly owned subsidiary of Central. The purchase price exceeded the fair value of net assets acquired by approximately $1.4 million, which was recorded as goodwill.
Management has determined that the reportable segments of the Company are Garden Products and Pet Products, based on the level at which the chief operating decision making group reviews the results of operations to make decisions regarding performance assessment and resource allocation.
Net sales:
Garden Products
Pet Products
Total net sales
Income from operations:
Corporate
Total income from operations
Interest expense—net
Depreciation and amortization:
Total depreciation and amortization
11
Assets:
Total assets
Goodwill (included in corporate assets):
Total goodwill
Corporate assets at March 25, 2006, include unallocated purchase consideration related to the Company’s acquisitions of approximately $300 million.
TFH Litigation. On March 24, 2006, the trial court entered a final judgment in the TFH litigation (described below) awarding Central $26,584,538. The Court required Herbert and Evelyn Axelrod to maintain a deposit of $41,000,000 with the court as security for the judgment pending an appeal.
In December 1997, Central acquired all of the stock of TFH Publications, Inc. (“TFH”) from Herbert and Evelyn Axelrod (the “Axelrods”). In connection with the transaction, Central made a $10 million loan to the Axelrods which was evidenced by a Promissory Note. In September 1998, the Axelrods brought suit against Central and certain executives of Central for damages and relief from their obligations under the Promissory Note. Central counterclaimed against the Axelrods for enforcement of the Promissory Note, damages and other relief, alleging, among other things, fraud and breaches of warranties. These actions, Herbert R. Axelrod and Evelyn Axelrod v. Central Garden & Pet Company; Glen S. Axelrod; Gary Hersch; William E. Brown; Robert B. Jones; Glenn Novotny; and Neill Hines, Docket No. MON-L-5100-99, and TFH Publications, Inc. v. Herbert Axelrod et al., Docket No. L-2127-99 (consolidated cases), are in the New Jersey Superior Court.
On September 1, 2005, a civil jury returned its verdict in the TFH litigation following a five-month trial. The jury returned an overall verdict in favor of Central. With regard to Central’s claims against the Axelrods, the jury awarded Central $20,340,000. The jury rejected most of the Axelrods’ claims against Central. The jury did find that Central had breached Consulting Agreements with the Axelrods and awarded the Axelrods $3.7 million in damages. The Axelrods also maintained that, as a result of an arbitration determination made before trial concerning a claimed purchase price adjustment, they were entitled to an additional approximately $2.6 million.
Following trial, the trial court decided various motions directed at issues of prejudgment interest, Central’s claim for attorneys fees and expenses, and the posting of appropriate security during the appeal. As a result of these motions and the jury’s prior verdict, the court entered judgment on March 24, 2006, awarding Central $26,584,538 comprised of $22,604,969 in damages and prejudgment interest (inclusive of all offsets due the Axelrods) and $3,979,569 in fees and expenses. The Axelrods were required to deposit $41,000,000 with the court, which has been done, pending appeal. Both the Axelrods and Central have the right to appeal the judgment.
Phoenix Fire. On August 2, 2000, a fire destroyed Central’s leased warehouse space in Phoenix, Arizona, and an adjoining warehouse space leased by a third party. At the time of the fire, Central maintained property insurance covering losses to the leased premises, Central’s inventory and equipment, and loss of business income. Central also maintained liability insurance providing $52
12
million of coverage (with no deductible), plus additional coverage for any amount of pre-judgment interest that Central might be obligated to pay.
On July 31, 2001, the adjoining warehouse tenant, Cardinal Health, and its insurers (the “Cardinal Plaintiffs”), filed a lawsuit against Central and other parties in the Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County. The Cardinal Plaintiffs sought to recover from Central, Arch Chemical Company (“Arch”) and others approximately $60 million in compensatory damages, plus pre-judgment interest and punitive damages. See Cardinal Health Inc., et al. v. Central Garden & Pet Company, et al., Civil Case No. CV2001-013152. On January 25, 2006, Central and its insurers, along with Arch and its insurers, entered into a Stipulation for Settlement with the Cardinal Plaintiffs. On March 10, 2006, the parties executed the final settlement documentation. The terms of the settlement are confidential, and the amounts which Central and Arch will each be required to contribute to the settlement will be determined in a subsequent arbitration proceeding. Central’s ultimate payment obligation towards the settlement with the Cardinal Plaintiffs will be paid entirely by Central’s insurers.
Local residents also filed a purported class action lawsuit alleging claims for bodily injury and property damage as a result of the fire. The residents’ lawsuit has now been settled as to all parties, and has received Court approval. As part of the settlement, Central’s liability insurers paid $7,825,000 on behalf of Central in May 2004.
The warehouse owner, B&L, and its insurer (the “B&L Plaintiffs”), as well as several nearby businesses, also filed lawsuits for property damage and business interruption, which were coordinated with the Cardinal Plaintiffs’ lawsuit. The lawsuits by nearby businesses have been dismissed, or settled with payments from Central’s insurers. The remaining lawsuit by the B&L Plaintiffs is pending in the Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County. The B&L Plaintiffs currently are claiming damages of approximately $10 million. There are various factual and legal issues regarding the liability, if any, of Central, the amount of recoverable damages, and the extent of Central’s available insurance coverage, all of which will depend on the outcome of complex litigation.
Certain wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company (as listed below, collectively the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”) have guaranteed fully and unconditionally, on a joint and several basis, the obligation to pay principal and interest under the Company’s $150,000,000 9-1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes (the “Notes”) issued on January 30, 2003 and under the Bank Credit Agreement dated February 28, 2006. Certain subsidiaries and operating divisions are not guarantors of the Notes and have been included in the Parent financial results below. Those subsidiaries that are guarantors of the Notes are as follows:
Farnam Companies, Inc.
Four Paws Products Ltd.
Grant Laboratories, Inc.
Gulfstream Home & Garden, Inc.
Interpet USA, LLC
Kaytee Products, Incorporated
Matthews Redwood & Nursery Supply, Inc.
New England Pottery LLC
Norcal Pottery Products, Inc.
Pennington Seed, Inc. (including Phaeton Corporation (dba Unicorn Labs), Pennington Seed, Inc. of Nebraska, Gro Tec, Inc., Seeds West, Inc., All-Glass Aquarium Co., Inc. (including Oceanic Systems, Inc.), and Cedar Works, LLC.)
Pets International, Ltd.
T.F.H. Publications, Inc.
Wellmark International
In lieu of providing separate unaudited financial statements for the Guarantor Subsidiaries, the Company has included the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidating financial statements based on the Company’s understanding of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s interpretation and application of Rule 3-10 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation S-X.
13
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended March 25, 2006
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Cost of products sold and occupancy
Income (loss) from operations
Interest – net
Income (loss) before income taxes
Net income (loss)
Equity in undistributed income of guarantor subsidiaries
Three Months Ended March 26, 2005
14
Six Months Ended March 25, 2006
Six Months Ended March 26, 2005
15
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETMarch 25, 2006(in thousands)
Accounts receivable
Land, buildings, improvements and equipment, net
Investment in guarantor subsidiaries
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Shareholders’ equity
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETSeptember 24, 2005(in thousands)
16
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWSSix Months Ended March 25, 2006(in thousands)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities
Expenditures for land, buildings, improvements and equipment
Assets acquired
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities
Repayments on revolving line of credit
Payments on long-term debt
Proceeds from issuance of stock
Tax benefits on options exercised
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents
CONSOLIDATING CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended March 26, 2005(in thousands)
Businesses acquired
Investments
Repayments under lines of credit, net
Payments to reacquire stock
17
Overview
Central Garden & Pet is a leading innovator, marketer and producer of quality branded products. We are one of the largest suppliers in the Lawn and Garden and Pet supplies industries. The total lawn and garden industry is estimated to be approximately $51 billion in retail sales. We estimate the applicable portion of the lawn and garden supplies market to our business is approximately $15 billion. The total pet industry is estimated to be approximately $37 billion in retail sales. We estimate the applicable portion of the pet supplies market to be approximately $8.5 billion.
Our lawn and garden supplies products include: proprietary and non-proprietary grass seed; wild bird feed, feeders, bird houses and other birding accessories; weed, grass, ant and other herbicide, insecticide and pesticide products; and decorative outdoor lifestyle and lighting products, including pottery, trellises and other wood products and holiday lighting. These products are sold under a number of brand names including Pennington, Rebels, Cedar Works, AMDRO, Grants, Lilly Miller, Sevin, Over’n Out, Norcal Pottery, New England Pottery, GKI/Bethlehem Lighting and Matthews Four Seasons.
Our pet supplies products include: products for dogs and cats, including bones, premium healthy edible and non-edible chews, premium dog and cat food, leashes, collars, toys, pet carriers, grooming supplies and other accessories; products for birds, small animals and specialty pets, including food, cages and habitats, toys, chews and related accessories; animal and household health and insect control products; products for fish, reptiles and other aquarium-based pets, including aquariums, furniture and lighting fixtures, pumps and filters and water conditioners and supplements, and information and knowledge resources; and products for horses and livestock. These products are sold under a number of brand names including All-Glass Aquarium, Oceanic, Energy Savers Unlimited, Kent Marine, Interpet, TFH, Nylabone, Four Paws, Pet Select, Kaytee, Super Pet, Zodiac, Pre Strike, Altosid, Breeder’s Choice and Farnam.
In fiscal 2005, our consolidated net sales were $1.4 billion, of which our lawn and garden segment, or Garden Products, accounted for approximately $740 million and our pet segment, or Pet Products, accounted for approximately $640 million. In fiscal 2005, our income from operations was $100.1 million of which Garden Products accounted for $47.1 million and Pet Products accounted for $83.7 million, before corporate expenses and eliminations of $30.7 million.
Central was incorporated in Delaware in June 1992 and is the successor to a California corporation which was incorporated in 1955. References to “we,” “us,” “our,” or “Central” mean Central Garden & Pet Company and its subsidiaries and divisions, and their predecessor companies and subsidiaries.
Background
We have transitioned our company to a leading marketer and producer of branded products from a traditional pet and lawn and garden supplies distributor. We made this transition because we recognized the opportunity to build a portfolio of leading brands and improve profitability by capitalizing on our knowledge of the pet and lawn and garden supplies sectors, our strong relationships with retailers, and our nationwide sales and logistics network. Our goal was to diversify our business and improve operating margins by establishing a portfolio of leading brands. Since 1997, we have acquired numerous branded product companies and product lines, including Wellmark and Four Paws in fiscal 1997; Kaytee Products, TFH and Pennington Seed in fiscal 1998; Norcal Pottery in fiscal 1999; AMDRO and All-Glass Aquarium in fiscal 2000; Lilly Miller in fiscal 2001; Alaska Fish Fertilizer in fiscal 2002; Kent Marine, New England Pottery, Interpet, certain assets of KRB Seed Company, (dba Budd Seed), and Energy Savers Unlimited in fiscal 2004; Pets International and Gulfstream Home & Garden in fiscal 2005; and Farnam Companies, Inc. and Breeder’s Choice Pet Food Inc in fiscal 2006.
While expanding our branded products business, we experienced adverse events in our distribution business. From 1995 to 1999, we were the master distributor of Round Up and Ortho. In January 1999, The Scotts Company, one of our largest distribution suppliers at the time, acquired Ortho and became the marketing agent for Round Up. In July 2000, Scotts terminated its relationship with us. Subsequently, we downsized our distribution operations and integrated these sales and logistics networks into our pet and lawn and garden products businesses to allow us to focus resources and provide strategic sales support for our brands. Virtually all of our sales before fiscal 1997 were derived from distributing other manufacturers’ products. Since then, our branded product sales have grown to approximately $1.1 billion, or approximately 78% of total sales, in fiscal 2005. During this same period, our sales of other manufacturers’ products have declined to approximately 22% of total sales, and our gross profit margins have improved from 13.6% in fiscal 1996 to 32.1% in fiscal 2005.
18
Recent Developments
On March 8, 2006, we issued 1,975,000 shares of common stock at an offering price per share of $53.50, approximately $104 million in net proceeds.
In March 2006, the Company increased its equity interest in Tech Pac, L.L.C. from 20% to 80%. The Company paid approximately $21 million in cash and deposited approximately $16 million in cash in an escrow account for possible contingent performance based payments over the next five years (both amounts are included in Other Assets). The Company previously acquired its 20% interest in Tech Pac upon its acquisition of Gulfstream Home & Garden, Inc. which held a 20% interest in Tech Pac in February 2005. Tech Pac is a leading supplier of insect control branded products in the lawn and garden market place. Tech Pac’s leading brands include Sevin®, a broad-based insecticide, Over’nOut!® for fire ant control and RooTone a leading root stimulant for the gardening enthusiast. The Company has not yet finalized its allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired. The results of Tech Pac have not been included in the consolidated financial statements.
On February 28, 2006, we arranged $650 million in senior secured credit facilities to finance the acquisition of Farnam Companies, Inc. and to replace our existing $125 million revolving credit facility maturing in May 2008 and our existing $175 million term loan maturing in May 2009. The new credit facilities consist of a $350 million revolving credit facility maturing in February 2011 and a $300 million term loan maturing in September 2012. Interest on the revolving credit facility is based on a rate equal to prime plus a margin, which fluctuates from 0% to 0.25% or LIBOR plus a margin which fluctuates from 0.75% to 1.375%, determined quarterly based on consolidated total debt to consolidated EBITDA for the most recent trailing 12-month period. Interest on the term loan is based on a rate equal to LIBOR + 1.50% or the prime rate plus 0.50%, at our option. The term loan is payable in quarterly installments of $750,000 with the balance payable in September 2012. This facility is secured by essentially all of our assets, contains certain financial covenants requiring maintenance of minimum levels of interest coverage and maximum levels of total debt to EBITDA, and restricts our ability to repurchase our stock, make investments in or acquisitions of other businesses and pay dividends above certain levels over the life of the facility.
In February 2006, the Company acquired Farnam Companies, Inc., for approximately $287 million in cash, plus $4 million for the purchase of related real property. Farnam is a leading manufacturer and marketer of innovative health care products primarily for horses, household pets and livestock sold through over-the-counter and veterinary channels. In addition to the internationally recognized Farnam umbrella brand, Farnam’s portfolio of industry leading brands includes Equicare®, ComboCare™, IverCare™, and Repel-X® for horses; D-Worm™, BioSpot® and Scratchex® for household pets; and Adams™ and Bite Free™ insect controls for home and yard care. In its fiscal year ending November 30, 2005, Farnam generated net sales of approximately $160 million. The purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net tangible assets acquired by approximately $230 million, which is presently classified within Other Assets. The Company has not yet finalized its allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of intangible assets acquired. The consolidated financial statements include the results of Farnam from the date of acquisition. The final allocation of the purchase price to intangible assets could result in a decrease in operating results recognized to date.
In February 2006, the Company acquired the assets of Breeder’s Choice Pet Foods Inc., for approximately $25 million in cash. Breeder’s Choice is a leading branded marketer and manufacturer of premium all natural, healthy dog and cat food sold exclusively in the pet specialty channel under the brands AvoDerm®, Pinnacle®, Active Care® and, Advanced Pet Diets®. The Company has not yet finalized its allocation of the purchase price to the fair value of assets acquired. The results of Breeder’s Choice have not been included in the consolidated financial statements, and the purchase price paid is included in Other Assets.
In December 2005, we acquired certain intellectual property assets from Shirlo, Inc. for approximately $10 million in cash. The assets acquired from Shirlo, Inc. include the company’s exclusive marketing rights to etofenprox, an insect adulticide approved for on-animal use. The acquired assets were combined with Wellmark International, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The purchase price exceeded the fair value of net assets acquired by approximately $1.4 million, which was recorded as goodwill.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Through 2005, we accounted for our stock plans using the intrinsic value method. Effective the beginning of fiscal 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” and elected the modified prospective application method upon adoption. SFAS No. 123(R) requires us to use a fair-value based method in determining stock-based compensation. Accordingly, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award,
19
and expensed over the employees’ requisite service period. Total compensation cost for our share based compensation plans in the first six months of 2006 was $2.5 million.
Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and Judgments
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies, estimates and assumptions or the judgments affecting the application of those accounting policies since our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 24, 2005.
Stock-based compensation: In fiscal 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective transition method and began accounting for our stock-based compensation using a fair-valued based recognition method. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair-value of the award and is expensed ratably over the requisite service period of the award. Determining the appropriate fair-value model and calculating the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires considerable judgment, including estimating stock price volatility, expected option life and forfeiture rates. We develop our estimates based on historical data and market information which can change significantly over time.
We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to value employee stock awards. We estimate stock price volatility based on an average historical volatility of our stock. Estimated option life and forfeiture rate assumptions are also derived from historical data. We recognize compensation expense using the straight-line amortization method for stock based compensation awards with graded vesting. Had we used alternative valuation methodologies, the amount we expense for stock based payments could be significantly different.
Results of Operations
Compared with Three Months Ended March 26, 2005
Net sales for the three months ended March 25, 2006 increased $22.5 million, or 5.9%, to $401.3 million from $378.9 million for the three months ended March 26, 2005. Pet Products’ net sales increased $28.8 million, or 18.2%, to $187.2 million for the three months ended March 25, 2006 from $158.4 million in the comparable fiscal 2005 period. Garden Products’ net sales decreased $6.3 million, or 2.9%, to $214.1 million for the three months ended March 25, 2006 from $220.4 million in the comparable fiscal 2005 period. Our branded product sales increased $28.0 million and sales of other manufacturers’ products decreased $5.5 million. Our Pet Products’ branded product sales increased $28.5 million due primarily to recent acquisitions. Our Garden Products’ branded product sales decreased $0.5 million due primarily to reduced bird feed sales and the disposition of our soils business partially offset by approximately $4 million in sales from prior year acquisitions.
Gross profit for the three months ended March 25, 2006 increased $9.9 million, or 7.8%, to $136.8 million from $126.9 million for the three months ended March 26, 2005. The gross profit increase was primarily in Pet Products. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased from 33.5% for the three months ended March 26, 2005 to 34.1% for the three months ended March 25, 2006 due to an increase in the Garden Products gross profit percentage partially offset by a Pet Products percentage decrease of 120 basis points due primarily to an unfavorable product mix shift.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $3.8 million, or 4.4%, from $87.2 million for the three months ended March 26, 2005 to $91.0 million for the three months ended March 25, 2006. The increase was due primarily to increased selling expenses. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 22.7% for the three months ended March 25, 2006, compared to 23.0% in the comparable prior year period.
Selling and delivery expense increased $4.0 million, or 9.0%, from $44.4 million for the three months ended March 26, 2005 to $48.4 million for the three months ended March 25, 2006. The increase was due primarily to the quarter’s increased sales.
Facilities expense remained flat at $3.1 million for the three months ended March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005.
Warehouse and administrative expense remained relatively flat, decreasing $0.2 million, or 0.5%, from $39.7 million for the three months ended March 26, 2005 to $39.5 million for the three months ended March 25, 2006. The decrease was due primarily to approximately $3 million incurred in the prior year quarter in professional fees, primarily related to legal and litigation expenses and
20
Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. This reduction in expenses was partially offset by approximately $3 million of expenses incurred in the current quarter of $1.1 million for stock based compensation as a result of adopting SFAS 123(R), and approximately $1.9 million in the Pet Products group related to recent acquisitions.
Net interest expense for the three months ended March 25, 2006 increased $4.1 million, or 74.5%, to $9.6 million from $5.5 million for the three months ended March 26, 2005. Of this increase, $1.6 million represented a write-off of deferred financing fees and expenses associated with the early retirement of our $125 million revolving credit facility and $175 million term loan. The remainder of the increase was due primarily to the higher average debt balance resulting from acquisitions financed through our issuance of $650 million in senior secured credit facilities in the current quarter and slightly higher interest rates on our floating rate debt.
Other income decreased $0.2 million from $2.0 million expense reported for the quarter ended March 26, 2005 to $1.8 million for the quarter ended March 25, 2006. Other income represents income from four equity method investments.
Our effective income tax rate for the quarter ended March 25, 2006 was 30.8% compared with 38.1% for the quarter ended March 26, 2005. The current quarter effective tax rate was lower than in the prior year due principally to the reversal of tax contingency reserves (non-cash) of approximately $2.6 million provided in prior periods. These reserves were reversed based on findings during an Internal Revenue Service examination of our 2003 and 2004 consolidated income tax returns. The reserves related to certain income tax credits taken on prior tax returns.
Compared with Six Months Ended March 26, 2005
Net sales for the six months ended March 25, 2006 increased $49.7 million, or 7.7%, to $694.1 million from $644.4 million for the six months ended March 26, 2005. Pet Products’ net sales increased $39.2 million, or 12.4%, to $354.4 million for the six months ended March 25, 2006 from $315.2 million in the comparable fiscal 2005 period. Garden Products’ net sales increased $10.5 million, or 3.2%, to $339.7 million for the six months ended March 25, 2006 from $329.2 million in the comparable fiscal 2005 period. Our branded product sales increased $51.5 million and sales of other manufacturers’ products decreased $1.8 million. Our Pet Products’ branded product sales increased $38.1 million due primarily to recent acquisitions. Our Garden Products’ branded product sales increased $13.4 million with approximately $4 million in sales from prior year acquisitions partially offset by reduced bird feed sales and the disposition of our soils business.
Gross profit for the six months ended March 25, 2006 increased $15.9 million, or 7.4%, to $228.8 million from $212.9 million for the six months ended March 26, 2005. Pet Products’ gross profit increased $12.7 million, or 10.9% and Garden Products’ gross profit increased $3.2 million, or 3.3%. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales remained flat at 33.0% for the six months ended March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005. The Garden Products gross profit percentage remained relatively flat while the Pet Products percentage decreased 60 basis points as a result of the unfavorable product mix shift in the most recent fiscal quarter.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $9.5 million, or 5.8%, from $163.7 million for the six months ended March 26, 2005 to $173.2 million for the six months ended March 25, 2006. The increase was due primarily to increased selling expenses. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 25.0% for the six months ended March 25, 2006, compared to 25.4% in the comparable prior year period.
Selling and delivery expense increased $7.9 million, or 9.7%, from $81.7 million for the six months ended March 26, 2005 to $89.6 million for the six months ended March 25, 2006. The increase was due primarily to the increased sales as selling and delivery expenses as a percentage of net sales remained relatively consistent at 12.9% in the current year period as compared to 12.7% in the prior year period.
Facilities expense increased $0.8 million to $6.7 million for the six months ended March 25, 2006 from $5.9 million for the six months ended March 26, 2005. The increase was due primarily to facility relocation costs incurred in fiscal quarter one of fiscal 2006 as part of our previously announced restructuring effort within Garden Products.
Warehouse and administrative expense increased $0.8 million, or 1.1%, from $76.1 million for the six months ended March 26, 2005 to $76.9 million for the six months ended March 25, 2006. The increase was due primarily to $2 million for stock based compensation as a result of adopting SFAS 123(R), $2 million related to recent acquisitions in the Pet Products group and $2 million for restructuring charges partially offset by approximately $5 million of reduced expenses incurred in the prior fiscal year for professional fees, primarily related to legal and litigation expenses and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance.
21
Net interest expense for the six months ended March 25, 2006 increased $4.6 million, or 43.0%, to $15.3 million from $10.7 million for the six months ended March 26, 2005. Of this increase, $1.6 million represented a write-off of deferred financing fees and expenses associated with the early retirement of our and $125 million revolving credit facility and $175 million term loan. The remainder of the increase was due primarily to the higher average debt balance resulting from acquisitions financed through our issuance of $650 million in senior secured credit facilities in the current year and slightly higher interest rates on our floating rate debt, partially offset by increased interest income of $1.1 million.
Other income remained relatively flat, increasing $0.2 million to $1.8 million for the six months ended March 25, 2006 from $1.6 million for the six months ended March 26, 2005. Other income represents income from four equity method investments.
Our effective income tax rate for the six months ended March 25, 2006 was 31.6% compared with 38.0% for the six months ended March 26, 2005. The lower rate reflects the reversal of tax contingency reserves (non cash) of approximately $2.6 million provided in prior periods. The reserves were reversed based on findings during an IRS examinations of our 2003 and 2004 consolidated income tax returns. The reserves related to certain income tax credits taken on prior tax returns.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have financed our growth through a combination of bank borrowings, supplier credit, internally generated funds and sales of equity and debt securities to the public.
Historically, our business has been seasonal and our working capital requirements and capital resources tracked closely to this seasonal pattern. During the first fiscal quarter, accounts receivable reach their lowest level while inventory, accounts payable and short-term borrowings begin to increase. During the second fiscal quarter, receivables, accounts payable and short-term borrowings begin to increase, reflecting the build-up of inventory and related payables in anticipation of the peak lawn and garden selling season. During the third fiscal quarter, inventory levels remain relatively constant while accounts receivable peak and short-term borrowings start to decline as cash collections are received during the peak selling season. During the fourth fiscal quarter, inventory levels are at their lowest, and accounts receivable and payables are substantially reduced through conversion of receivables to cash. As a result of the reduction in sales of garden products manufactured by other parties as a percentage of overall sales, this seasonal pattern has become somewhat less significant.
We service two broad markets: pet supplies and lawn and garden supplies. Our pet supplies businesses generally sell products that have a year round selling cycle with very little change quarter to quarter. As a result, it is not necessary to maintain large quantities of inventory to meet peak demands. Additionally, this level sales cycle eliminates the need for manufacturers to give extended credit terms to either distributors or retailers. On the other hand, our lawn and garden businesses are highly seasonal with approximately 63% of Garden Products’ net sales occurring during the second and third fiscal quarters. For many manufacturers of garden products, this seasonality requires them to ship large quantities of their product well ahead of the peak consumer buying periods. To encourage distributors to stock large quantities of inventory, industry practice has been for manufacturers to give extended credit terms and/or promotional discounts.
The primary cash flows for the six months ended March 25, 2006 were $382.5 million in cash used in investing activities (primarily for the acquisition of businesses) and $64.6 million of cash used by operating activities partially offset by $437.5 million provided by financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities increased due to the issuance of $650 million in senior secured facilities and the issuance of 1,975,000 shares of our common stock, the proceeds of which were used to refinance our existing credit facilities and to finance the acquisition of Farnam Companies, Inc.
At March 25, 2006, our total debt outstanding was $655.8 million compared to $368.7 million at March 26, 2005, due to the establishment of larger credit facilities to replace our existing credit facilities during our second fiscal 2006 quarter, the proceeds of which were used to acquire the stock of Farnam Companies, Inc. and finance seasonal working capital needs.
Concurrent with the acquisition of Farnam Companies, Inc., we arranged $650 million in senior secured credit facilities to finance the acquisition and to replace our existing $125 million revolving credit facility maturing in May 2008 and our existing $175 million term loan maturing in May 2009. The new credit facilities consist of a $350 million revolving credit facility maturing in February 2011 and a $300 million term loan maturing in September 2012. Interest on the revolving credit facility is based on a rate equal to prime plus a margin, which fluctuates from 0% to 0.25% or LIBOR plus a margin which fluctuates from 0.75% to 1.375%, determined quarterly based on consolidated total debt to consolidated EBITDA for the most recent trailing 12-month period. Interest on the term loan is based on a rate equal to LIBOR + 1.50% or the prime rate plus 0.50%, at our option. The term loan is payable in quarterly installments of $750,000 with the balance payable in September 2012. This facility is secured by substantially all of our assets, contains certain financial covenants which require us to maintain minimum levels of interest coverage and maximum levels of total debt to EBITDA,
22
and which restrict our ability to repurchase our stock, make investments in or acquisitions of other businesses and pay dividends above certain levels over the life of the facility. We were in compliance with all financial covenants as of March 25, 2006. The balance outstanding at March 25, 2006 under the revolving credit facility was $205.7 million, and the remaining available borrowing capacity was $134.1 million, with $10.2 million outstanding under certain letters of credit.
In March 2006, we deposited approximately $16 million into an escrow account in connection with our purchase of an additional 60% equity interest in Tech Pac L.L.C. for possible contingent performance based payments over the next five years.
We believe that cash flows from operating activities, funds available under our credit facility, and arrangements with suppliers will be adequate to fund our presently anticipated working capital requirements for the foreseeable future. We anticipate that our capital expenditures will not exceed $40 million for the next 12 months. The increased level of expected capital expenditures, compared to our historical rate, is due to our implementation of a scalable enterprise-wide information technology platform to support future growth and to enable us to take advantage of new applications and technologies. We have selected SAP as our software provider and anticipate investing approximately $30 million over the next four years to implement our new information technology strategy. This initiative, when complete, will combine our numerous information systems into one enterprise system to provide a common ERP platform that will enable many of our strategic initiatives and enhance our operating efficiency.
As part of our growth strategy, we have engaged in acquisition discussions with a number of companies in the past, and we anticipate that we will continue to evaluate potential acquisition candidates. If one or more material acquisition opportunities become available in the near future, we may require additional external capital. In addition, such acquisitions would subject us to the general risks associated with acquiring companies, particularly if the acquisitions are relatively large.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There have been no material changes to the information provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 24, 2005 regarding off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of business in our contractual obligations set forth in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 24, 2005.
Weather and Seasonality
Historically, our sales of lawn and garden products have been influenced by weather and climate conditions in the markets we serve. Additionally, Garden Products’ business has been highly seasonal. In fiscal 2005, approximately 63% of Garden Products’ net sales and 57% of our total net sales occurred in the Company’s second and third fiscal quarters. Substantially all of Garden Products’ operating income is typically generated in this period, which has historically offset the operating loss incurred during the first fiscal quarter of the year.
We believe there has been no material change in our exposure to market risk from that discussed in our fiscal 2005 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.
(a) Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) that ensure that information relating to the Company required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is
23
recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely and proper manner and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based upon this review, we believe that the controls and procedures in place are effective to ensure that information relating to the Company that is required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is properly disclosed as required by the Exchange Act and related regulations.
(b) Changes in internal controls. There were no significant changes in our internal controls during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
For information on our material legal proceedings, you should read Note 9 “Contingencies” to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I – Item 1 of this report.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Form 10-K in response to Item 1A. to Part I of Form 10-K except as follows:
Our acquisition strategy involves a number of risks.
We have completed numerous acquisitions since 1997 and intend to grow through the acquisition of additional companies. We completed six acquisitions in fiscal 2004 and three in fiscal 2005. In addition, in February 2006 we completed the acquisition of Farnam Companies, Inc. for approximately $291 million. Farnam constituted a very significant acquisition for us.
We are regularly engaged in acquisition discussions with a number of companies and anticipate that one or more potential acquisition opportunities, including those that would be material, may become available in the near future. If and when appropriate acquisition opportunities become available, we intend to pursue them actively. Acquisitions involve a number of special risks, including:
These risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We have faced, and expect to continue to face, increased competition for acquisition candidates, which may limit the number of opportunities and may lead to higher acquisition prices. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify, acquire, or manage profitably additional businesses or to integrate successfully any acquired businesses into our existing business without substantial costs, delays or other operational or financial difficulties. In future acquisitions, we also could incur additional indebtedness or pay consideration in excess of fair value, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
24
Except as set forth in the table below, we did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the quarter ended March 25, 2006.
Period
September 25, 2005 – October 29, 2005
October 30, 2005 – November 26, 2005
November 27, 2005 – December 24, 2005
December 25, 2005 – January 28, 2006
January 29, 2006 – February 25, 2006
February 26, 2006 – March 25, 2006
Not applicable
William E. Brown
Glenn W. Novotny
Brooks M. Pennington III
John B. Balousek
David N. Chichester
Alfred A. Piergallini
Bruce A. Westphal
Set forth below is the tabulation with respect to the election of directors at the meeting:
Common
Class B
Brooks M. Pennington
David Chichester
Alfred A. Piergalliini
25
Set forth below is the tabulation with respect to the matter voted on at the meeting:
For
Against
Abstain
Broker non-vote
26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunder duly authorized.
Registrant
Dated: May 4, 2006
27