Crane NXT
CXT
#4287
Rank
โ‚ฌ2.49 B
Marketcap
43,32ย โ‚ฌ
Share price
1.48%
Change (1 day)
-23.07%
Change (1 year)
Text size:
FORM 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

(x) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
OR
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
---------------- ---------------
Commission file number 1-1657
------
CRANE CO.
-----------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 13-1952290
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No)

100 First Stamford Place, Stamford, CT 06902
- -------------------------------------- ----------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (203) 363-7300
--------------
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Name of each exchange on
Title of each class which registered
------------------- -----------------------
Common shares, par value $1.00 New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Share Purchase Rights New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
7 1/4% senior notes due June, 1999
8 1/2% senior notes due March, 2004
------------------------------------
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2)has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
---- ----

Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. (X)

Based on the average stock price of $32.94 on January 31, 1997 the aggregate
market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was
$1,224,688,745.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, $1.00 par
value was 45,537,559 at January 31, 1997.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
-----------------------------------

Portions of the annual shareholders report for the year ended December 31, 1996
are incorporated by reference into Parts I, II and IV.

Portions of the proxy statement for the annual shareholders meeting April 21,
1997 are incorporated by reference into Parts I and III.
PART I
Item 1. Business
--------

Crane is a diversified manufacturer of engineered industrial products
and the nation's largest American distributor of doors, windows and millwork.
Founded in 1855, Crane employs over 10,000 people in North America, Europe, Asia
and Australia.

STRATEGY

The company's strategy is to grow the earnings of niche businesses with
high market share, build an aggressive and committed management team whose
interests are directly aligned to those of the shareholders, and maintain a
focused, efficient corporate structure.

ACQUISITIONS

In the past five years, the company has completed 14 acquisitions.
During 1996, the company acquired two companies. In mid October, the company
acquired Interpoint Corporation in a tax-free merger in which the company issued
1,094,312 shares of Crane Co. common stock and assumed $26 million in debt.
Interpoint is a leader in the design and manufacture of standard and custom
miniature DC-to-DC power converters with applications in aerospace and medical
technology industries. In late October the company acquired Grenson Electronics
Ltd. of Daventry, England for a cash payment of $2.7 million. Grenson
Electronics produces low voltage power conversion electronics for aerospace,
defense and industrial markets.

During 1995, the company completed three acquisitions at a cost of $9.4
million. In February the company, through its Barksdale subsidiary, acquired
Unimess GmbH, a German-based manufacturer of a full line of solid state pressure
switches and transducers, level switches and indicating systems, and flow
measurement and control components for specialized instrumentation requirements
in numerous industrial processes. In the fourth quarter, the company acquired
Process Systems, Inc. based in Michigan. Process Systems is a manufacturer of
vertical turbine pumps and accessories for industrial applications. In November
1995, the company acquired Kessel PTE Ltd., a fluoropolymer plastic lined pipe
manufacturer with facilities in Singapore and Thailand.

The company completed three acquisitions in 1994 at a total cost of $240
million. The company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Huttig Sash & Door
Company, acquired a molding and millwork manufacturing operation in Prineville,
Oregon in May 1994. In April, 1994, the company purchased Mark Controls
Corporation, a manufacturer of automatic and manually operated valves, and
specialized instruments and controls, for commercial and industrial customers.
The company acquired ELDEC Corporation in March 1994. ELDEC's products are used
worldwide on all major commercial and business aircraft and include: position
indication and control systems, proximity switches and components, true mass
fuel flowmeters, and power conversion components and systems.

In 1993, the company completed five acquisitions at a total cost of $106
million. In December, the company acquired Burks Pumps, Inc., which has
manufacturing facilities in Piqua, Ohio and Decatur, Illinois and provides
engineered pumps for an array of specialized commercial, industrial and
municipal fluid handling applications. The products are marketed under the
Barnes, Burks, Weinman and Prosser brand names. Also included was a line of tank
cleaning equipment sold under the Sellers brand name for the industrial cleaning
place market. This acquisition substantially increased Crane's involvement in
niche pump markets.

In October 1993, the company acquired Filon, a manufacturer of
fiberglass-reinforced plastic (FRP) panels. Filon was integrated with the
company's Kemlite unit in the fourth quarter of 1993. The Filon acquisition
significantly expanded Kemlite's position as a supplier of FRP panels to the
recreational vehicle market.

/1
PART I (continued)

Item 1. Business (continued)
--------

In April and May 1993 Huttig Sash & Door Company expanded its nationwide
millwork distribution by acquiring Rondel's Inc., a millwork distributor serving
the eastern Washington/western Idaho region, and the Whittier-Ruhle Millwork
Company, serving the Mid-Atlantic region.

Perflow Instruments, Ltd., a British manufacturer of pressure and flow
measurement equipment, was added to Crane Ltd. in 1993.

In 1992, certain assets of Jenkins Canada, Inc., a manufacturer of
bronze and iron valves, were acquired as an addition to the company's North
American valve unit.

DIVESTITURES

In the past five years, the company has divested four businesses. In
March of 1996, the company sold Empire Foundry. In December 1994, Huttig sold
its window manufacturing business for $2.4 million. The transaction excluded
real estate and receivables. In July 1994, the company sold Modulinc, the fiber
optic channel product line of ELDEC. In April 1993, the company sold its
precision ordnance business, UniDynamics/Phoenix for approximately $6 million.

LONG-TERM FINANCING

In June 1994 the company sold $150,000,000 of 7 1/4% notes that will
mature on June 15, 1999. During March 1992 the company sold $100,000,000 of
8 1/2% notes that will mature on March 15, 2004.

BUSINESS SEGMENTS

See pages 26 and 27 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for sales,
operating profit and assets employed of each business segment.

FLUID HANDLING

The Fluid Handling segment consists of valve, pump and water treatment
businesses. The Crane Valve business with five manufacturing facilities in North
America, as well as plants in the United Kingdom, Australia, Norway, China and
Indonesia, sells a wide variety of commodity and special purpose valves and
fluid control products for the chemical and hydrocarbon processing, power
generation, marine, general industrial and commercial construction industries.
Products are sold under the Crane, Jenkins, Pacific, Westad, Flowseal and Center
Line brands. Crane Pumps has six manufacturing facilities in the United States
located in Ohio, Illinois, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Michigan. Pumps are
manufactured under the Deming, Weinman, Chempump, Burks, Chem/Meter, Barnes,
Sellers and Process Systems brand names. Pumps are sold to a broad customer
base, which includes chemical and hydrocarbon process industries, automotive,
municipal, industrial and commercial wastewater, power generation, commercial
heating, ventilation and air-conditioning industries and original equipment
manufacturers. The water treatment business has a manufacturing facility in
Pennsylvania and serves the water and wastewater treatment market. Its products
are sold under the Cochrane name. This group employs 3,000 people and had assets
of $255.1 million at December 31, 1996. Fluid Handling order backlog totaled
$88.6 million, a $2 million decline from the prior year.

Products in this group are sold directly to end users through Crane's
sales organization and through independent distributors and manufacturers
representatives.

/2
PART I (continued)

Item 1. Business (continued)
--------

AEROSPACE

The Aerospace segment consists of ELDEC, Hydro-Aire, Lear Romec and
Interpoint.

The group employs 2,300 people and had assets of $251.7 million at year
end. The order backlog totaled $269 million at December 31, 1996, an increase of
28% from the prior year. This increase was attributable mainly to Interpoint.

ELDEC designs, manufactures and markets custom position indication and
control systems, proximity sensors and components, true mass fuel flowmeters,
power conversion components and systems for the commercial, business and
military aerospace industries, and military marine and telecommunications
markets. These products are custom designed for specific aircraft to meet
technically demanding requirements of the aerospace industry. Grenson
Electronics of Daventry, England, which the company acquired in the fourth
quarter of 1996, has been integrated with ELDEC. Grenson produces low voltage
power conversion electronics for aerospace, defense and industrial markets.

ELDEC also has a $5.0 million 47% equity investment in Powec A/S, a
Norwegian manufacturer of power conditioning products and systems, whose
products are complementary to the products and complex power systems engineering
capabilities at ELDEC. This accelerates the transfer of our Aerospace power
conversion technology to the commercial wireless telecommunications market.

Hydro-Aire designs, manufactures and sells anti-skid and automatic
braking systems, fuel and hydraulic pumps, and coolant pumps and systems,
hydraulic and pneumatic valves and regulators, actuators and solid state
components for the commercial, business and military aerospace industries as
original equipment. In addition, the company designs and manufactures systems
similar to those above for the retrofit of aircraft with improved systems and
manufactures replacement parts for systems installed as original equipment by
the aircraft manufacturer. All of these products are largely proprietary to the
company and, to some extent, are custom designed to the requirements and
specifications of the aircraft manufacturer or program contractor. These systems
and replacement parts are sold directly to airlines, governments, and aircraft
maintenance and overhaul companies.

Lear Romec designs, manufactures and sells lubrication and fuel pumps
for aircraft, aircraft engines and radar cooling systems for the commercial and
military aerospace industries. Lear Romec has a leading share of the non-captive
market for turbine engine lube and scavenge oil pumps. Lear Romec also
manufactures fuel boost and transfer pumps for commuter and business aircraft.

Interpoint designs, manufactures and sells thick-film hybrid DC-to-DC
power converters, custom microcircuits and accessory products for applications
in commercial and military aerospace and space industries and in the medical
technology industry.



/3
PART I (continued)

Item 1. Business (continued)
--------

ENGINEERED MATERIALS

The Engineered Materials segment consists of five businesses:
Kemlite, Cor Tec, Resistoflex, Polyflon and Crane Plumbing.

This group had assets of $102 million at December 31, 1996 and employed
1,100 people. Order backlog at year end 1996 was strong at $22.6 million, a
slight increase from the prior year.

Kemlite manufactures fiberglass-reinforced plastic panels for use
principally by the transportation industry in refrigeration and dry van truck
trailers and recreational vehicles. Kemlite products are also sold to the
commercial construction industry for food processing, fast food restaurant and
supermarket applications, and to institutions where fire rated materials with
low smoke generation and minimum toxicity are required. Kemlite sells its
products directly to the truck trailer and recreational vehicle manufacturers.
Kemlite uses distributors to serve its commercial construction market and some
segments of the recreational vehicle market.

Cor Tec manufactures fiberglass-reinforced laminated panels serving the
truck and truck trailer segment of the transportation industry. Cor Tec markets
its products directly to the truck and truck trailer manufacturers.

Resistoflex is engaged in the design, manufacture and sale of corrosion-
resistant, plastic-lined steel pipes, fittings, tanks, valves, expansion joints
and hose used primarily by the pharmaceutical, chemical processing, pulp and
paper, petroleum distribution, ultra pure water and waste management industries.
It also manufactures high-performance, separable fittings for operating
pressures to 8,000 PSI used primarily in the aerospace industry. Resistoflex
sells its industrial products through distributors who provide stocking and
fabrication services to industrial users in the United States. Its aerospace
products are sold directly to the aerospace industry. Resistoflex also
manufactures plastic-lined pipe products at its Singapore plant serving the
rapidly expanding Asian chemical processing industry as well as the Asian
pharmaceutical industry.

Polyflon manufactures radio frequency and microwave components,
capacitors, circuit processing, and antennas for commercial and aerospace uses.

Crane Plumbing manufactures plumbing fixtures in Canada. Its products
are sold through distributors in Canada and it has a large share of the Canadian
plumbing fixtures market.


/4
PART I (continued)

Item 1. Business (continued)
--------

CRANE CONTROLS

This segment includes five businesses: Barksdale, Powers Process
Controls, Dynalco Controls, Azonix, and Ferguson. The companies in this segment
design, manufacture and market industrial and commercial products that control
flows and processes in various industries including the petroleum, chemical,
construction, food and beverage, power generation industries and transportation.
Crane Controls had assets of $125.4 million at December 31, 1996, and employs
860 people. On December 31, 1996, Crane Controls had a backlog of $25 million, a
4% decline from the prior year level.

Barksdale manufactures solid state and electromechanical pressure and
vacuum switches, pressure transducers, temperature switches, and directional
control valves which serve a broad range of commercial and industrial
applications. It has manufacturing and marketing facilities in the United States
and Germany. The February 1995 acquisition of Unimess GmbH brought a full line
of solid state switches, transducers and indicating systems to Barksdale,
complementing existing German and United States product lines and market
channels.

Powers Process Controls designs, manufactures and markets
microprocessor-based process controllers and instrumentation, pneumatic actuated
control valves, self-contained temperature regulators, water mixing and thermal
shock protection shower valves and plumbing brass for industrial applications
and the institutional construction industry.

Dynalco Controls designs and manufactures rotational speed sensors,
monitoring instruments, and ignition and air to fuel control systems. Dynalco's
products are used worldwide by industries in a variety of applications,
including stationary natural gas engines, power generation, oil and gas
production and transmissions, and agriculture equipment.

Azonix manufactures high precision data acquisition, control systems and
operator interfaces for a wide range of industries which require equipment to
withstand harsh environments.

Ferguson designs and manufactures in the United States and through
Ferguson Machine S.A. in Europe, precision index and transfer systems for use on
and with machines which perform automatic forming, assembly, metal cutting,
testing and inspection operations. Products include index drives and tables,
mechanical parts handlers, in line transfer machines, rotary tables, press feeds
and custom cams.

The products in this segment are sold directly to end users, and
engineering contractors through the company's own sales forces and cooperatively
with sales representatives, stocking specialists and industrial distributors.

MERCHANDISING SYSTEMS

The Merchandising Systems segment has two operating units: National
Vendors, the industry leader in the design and manufacture of a complete line of
vending merchandisers for the food/service vending market; and NRI, which
manufactures electronic coin validators in Buxtehude, Germany for the automated
merchandising and gambling/amusement markets in Europe. National Vendors
products include electronic vending merchandisers for refrigerated and frozen
foods, hot and cold beverages, snack foods, single cup individually brewed hot
drinks and combination vendors/merchandisers, designed to vend both snack foods
and

/5
PART I (continued)

Item 1. Business (continued)
--------

MERCHANDISING SYSTEMS (continued)

hot/cold drinks, or snacks and refrigerated/frozen foods in one machine.
National Vendors manufactures its products in a 463,000 sq. ft. state of the art
facility in Bridgeton, Missouri. National Vendors' products are marketed
directly to customers in the United States and Europe by company sales and
marketing personnel, and in other international markets through independent
distributors. Merchandising Systems employs 1,000 people and had assets of $91.5
million at year end 1996.

Order backlog totaled $18.6 million at December 31, 1996, compared
to $14.7 million at December 31, 1995.

WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION

The company distributes millwork products through its wholly owned
subsidiary, Huttig Sash & Door Company ("Huttig"). These products include doors,
windows, moldings and related building products. Huttig assembles certain of
these products to customer specification prior to distribution. Its principal
customers are building material dealers, building contractors and home
remodelers that service the new construction and remodeling markets. Wholesale
operations are conducted nationally through forty-four distribution centers
throughout the United States, in both major and medium-sized cities. Huttig's
sales are made on both a direct shipment and out-of-warehouse basis entirely
through its own sales force.

Huttig also manufactures specialty molding and millwork products at its
Prineville, Oregon facility. The majority of the molding products are sold to
third parties but Huttig is the single largest customer. In 1996, Huttig closed
its manufacturing plant in Montana, where it produced certain of the above
products and other finished lumber.

Valve Systems & Controls is a value-added industrial distributor
providing power operated valves and flow control systems to the petroleum,
chemical, power and general processing industries. It services its customers
through facilities in Texas and Louisiana.

Crane Supply, a distributor of plumbing supplies, valves and piping in
Canada, maintains thirty-five branches throughout Canada and distributes Crane
manufactured products in that country. Crane Supply also distributes products
which are both complementary to and partly competitive with Crane's own
manufactured products.

OTHER

The other segment consists of Crane Defense Systems, which is the only
Crane business focused on defense industry products. Crane Defense Systems is
engaged in the development and manufacture of specialized handling systems,
elevators, winches, ground support equipment, cranes and associated electronics.
These products are sold directly to the government and defense contractors and
represent less than 1% of 1996 sales.

/6
PART I (continued)

Item 1. Business (continued)
--------

COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS

The company's lines of business are conducted under actively competitive
conditions in each of the geographic and product areas they serve. Because of
the diversity of the classes of products manufactured and sold, they do not
compete with the same companies in all geographic or product areas. Accordingly,
it is not possible to estimate the precise number of competitors or to identify
the principal methods of competition. Although reliable statistics are not
available, the company believes that it is an important supplier to a number of
market niches and geographic areas.

The company's products have primary application in the industrial,
construction, aerospace, automated merchandising, transportation, and fluid
handling industries. As such, they are dependent upon numerous unpredictable
factors, including changes in market demand, general economic conditions,
residential and commercial building starts, and capital spending. Because these
products are also sold in a wide variety of markets and applications, the
company does not believe it can reliably quantify or predict the possible
effects upon its business resulting from such changes.

Seasonality is a factor in Huttig and the Canadian operations.

The company's engineering and product development activities are
directed primarily toward improvement of existing products and adaptation of
existing products to particular customer requirements. While the company owns
numerous patents and licenses, none are of such importance that termination
would materially affect its business. Product development and engineering costs
totaled approximately $52,000,000 in 1996, $51,900,000 in 1995, and $46,400,000
in 1994 Included in these amounts were approximately $10,300,000, $12,600,000
and $9,500,000 received by the company in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively, for
customer sponsored research and development.

The company is not dependent on any single customer nor are there any
issues at this time regarding available raw materials for inventory.


/7
PART I (continued)

Item 1. Business (continued)
--------

Costs of compliance with federal, state and local laws and regulations
involving the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating
to the protection of the environment are not expected to have a material effect
upon the company's capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

Item 2. Properties
----------


MANUFACTURING FACILITIES* NUMBER AREA

Fluid Handling
United States 13 1,283,000 sq. ft.
Canada 2 140,000 sq. ft.
International 7 910,000 sq. ft.

Aerospace
United States 6 614,000 sq. ft.
International 3 35,000 sq. ft.

Engineered Materials
United States 7 710,000 sq. ft.
Canada 3 601,000 sq. ft.
International 1 10,000 sq. ft.

Crane Controls
United States 7 423,000 sq. ft.
International 2 53,000 sq. ft.

Merchandising Systems
United States 1 463,000 sq. ft.
Other International 1 77,000 sq. ft.

Wholesale Distribution 1 577,000 sq. ft.

Other 1 113,000 sq. ft.

- ------------------------

*Includes plants under lease agreements.

Leased Leases
Manufacturing Expiring
Facilities Number Area Through
------------- ------ ---- ---------

United States 9 463,000 sq. ft. 2006
Canada 1 12,000 sq. ft. 2000
Other International 5 67,000 sq. ft. 2013

Fluid Handling operates six valve service centers in the United States,
of which four are owned, and one distribution center in the United States. This
segment operates internationally eight distribution and seven service centers.

/8
PART I (continued)

Item 2. Properties (continued)
----------

Crane Controls operates two distribution centers internationally.

Merchandising Systems operates eight distribution centers in the United
States and six internationally.

Wholesale Distribution has forty-four Huttig branch warehouses in the
United States, of which twenty-seven are owned. The Canadian wholesale operation
maintains thirty-five distribution branch warehouses in Canada, of which fifteen
are owned. Valve Systems & Controls operates two leased distribution facilities
in the United States.

In the opinion of management, properties have been well maintained, are
in sound operating condition, and contain all necessary equipment and facilities
for their intended purposes.


/9
PART I (continued)

Item 3. Legal Proceedings
-----------------

Neither the company, nor any subsidiary of the company has become a
party to, nor has any of their property become the subject of any material legal
proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their
businesses, except for the following.

On February 28, 1991, the company was served with a complaint filed in
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri naming the company
and its former subsidiary, CF&I Steel Corporation ("CF&I"), as defendants and
alleging violations of the federal False Claims Act in connection with the
distribution of the company's shares of CF&I to the company's shareholders in
1985. A subsequent complaint with substantially similar allegations was served
on the company on September 22, 1992. The two actions have been consolidated by
the court (Civil Actions Nos. 91-0429-C-1 and 4:92CVOO5144JCH). On June 1,1993
the district court dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
under the False Claims Act and the plaintiff appealed. On November 16, 1994, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reinstated the action. The
company's petition for a writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court was denied
on or about June 16, 1995 and the case has been returned to the District court
to further proceedings. The case was brought in the name of the U.S. Government
by a private individual (the "relator") and involves allegations of a conspiracy
between the company and CF&I to cause the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
("PBGC") to assume certain unfunded liabilities under a CF&I pension plan
(alleged to have been approximately $270 million), to prevent the PBGC from
obtaining any reimbursement from the company and to publish and file misleading
information in furtherance of those alleged objectives. The suit seeks treble
damages and attorney's fees. The lawsuit was dismissed in May 1996 upon the
company's motions for summary judgment and for judgment on the pleadings. While
the relator has appealed this dismissal, the company believes that the dismissal
will be upheld on appeal and, accordingly, that the proceeding is not likely to
have a material effect on the company's results of operations or financial
condition.

The following proceedings are not considered by the company to be
material to its business or financial condition and are reported herein because
of the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to
the descriptions of administrative or judicial proceedings by governmental
authorities arising under federal, state or local provisions regulating the
discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the
protection of the environment.

In a letter dated October 15, 1992 the office of the Attorney General of
the State of Ohio advised Cor Tec, a division of Dyrotech Industries, Inc. which
is a subsidiary of the company, that Cor Tec's plant facility in Washington
Court House, Ohio, had operated numerous air contaminant sources in its
manufacturing process which emitted air pollutants for an extended period of
time without the required state permits and in some instances in amounts
exceeding the limits allegedly allowed under applicable rules. The Ohio Attorney
General's office also alleged that certain contaminant sources at the Cor Tec
facility were installed without obtaining permits to install. The main air
contaminant in question is styrene, a volatile organic compound that is alleged
to be a carcinogen. In 1993, in full cooperation with the Ohio EPA, Cor Tec
constructed an emission control system in its plant at a cost exceeding $700,000
which included the installation of a hood, vent and incinerator to capture and
incinerate the styrene emissions. At a meeting in Columbus, Ohio on March 4,
1993 the Attorney General's office representing the Ohio EPA, proposed that Cor
Tec and the company sign a Consent Decree which would include general injunctive
relief and civil penalties in the amount of $4.6 million which Cor Tec has
refused to do. In a letter dated July 17, 1995 the Attorney General's office of
the State of Ohio delivered a draft Complaint to Cor Tec (Court of Common Pleas,
Fayette County, Ohio) alleging failure by Cor Tec to obtain various permits to
install and to operate sources of contaminants and also alleging violations of
air emissions standards, for periods 1974 to 1993. Penalties of $25,000 per day
for each violation are demanded in the draft complaint. In a letter dated
November 9, 1995, the Attorney General's

/10
PART I (continued)

Item 3. Legal Proceedings (continued)

office presented a reduced civil penalty demand for $1.8 million and, by letter
dated December 9, 1996, the Attorney General's office again threatened to
commence suit in thirty (30) days (subsequently extended) unless Cor Tec
significantly increased its $50,000 offer to settle. Cor Tec has responded in
writing that, among other things, (i) the rule upon which the state's demands
are based was not adopted in accordance with applicable statutory directives and
is, therefore, unenforceable, (ii) Cor Tec has nevertheless complied with the
rule as it is currently applied by the state, (iii) the state has considerable
discretion in penalty calculation and the penalties sought by the state against
Cor Tec are wholly out of proportion with the nature of the alleged violations
and (iv) more lenient rules have been adopted for much larger VOC emission
sources located in more polluted urban areas and thus Cor Tec's competitors have
an advantage in the market place. On February 21, 1997, the Attorney General's
office on behalf of the Ohio EPA commenced a civil action against Cor Tec in the
Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County, Ohio alleging among other things, failure
to obtain various permits to install and operate sources of contaminants and
also alleging violation of air emission standards, for the period 1974 to 1993.
Penalties for $25,000 per day for each day of violation have been demanded in
the Complaint. Cor Tec continues to believe it has adequate defenses to the
allegations in the Complaint and it plans to vigorously resist paying any
damages, fines, or penalties.

On July 12, 1985 the company received written notice from the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") that the EPA believes the
company may be a potentially responsible party ("PRP") under the Federal
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensations and Liability Act of 1980
("CERCLA") to pay for investigation and corrective measures which may be
required to be taken at the Roebling Steel Company site in Florence Township,
Burlington County, New Jersey (the "Site") of which its former subsidiary, CF&I
Steel Corporation ("CF&I") was a past owner and operator prior to the enactment
of CERCLA. The stated grounds for the EPA's position was the EPA's belief that
the company had owned and/or operated the Site. The company had advised the EPA
that such was not the case and does not believe that it is responsible for any
testing or clean-up at the Site based on current facts.

The EPA has identified sources and areas of contamination at the
Roebling Site which must be examined for potential environmental damage. The EPA
has disclosed that two surface clean-ups have been performed at a cost in excess
of $19 million. In July 1996, the EPA completed a third Focused Feasibility
Study which defined the nature of the contaminants and evaluated appropriate
remedial alternatives, and the EPA estimated the cost of its preferred clean-up
alternative at $38 million.

On November 7, 1990 CF&I filed a petition for reorganization and
protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. In the
bankruptcy proceeding of CF&I, the EPA was allowed an unsecured claim against
CF&I for $27.1 million related to the EPA's environmental investigations and
remediation at the Roebling Site.

In June 1996 the company received a Section 104 request issued by
the EPA under CERCLA seeking information about the company's (and CF&I's)
connection to the Roebling Site. On August 26, 1996, the company filed its
response to the Section 104 Request and, to date, has received no further
communications from the EPA concerning the Roebling Site. Based on the facts and
circumstances summarized above, the company does not believe it is responsible
for any portion of the Roebling Site clean-up.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of 1996.

/11
PART I (continued)

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The executive officers of the registrant are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Business Experience Officer
Name Position During Past Five Years Age Since
- ---- -------- ---------------------- --- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Robert S. Evans Chairman and Chief Chairman and Chief 52 1974
Executive Officer Executive Officer of the company
since 1985 and previously
President of the company

L. Hill Clark President and Executive Vice President of 52 1994
Chief Operating the company, previously
Officer President of Lear Romec,
and previously held
various positions within
Allied Signal Inc., a diversified
manufacturing company

Robert J. Muller, Jr. Executive Vice Executive Vice President of 50 1988
President the company, responsible for
National Vendors division

Augustus I. duPont Vice President, Vice President and General 45 1996
General Counsel Counsel and Secretary of
and Secretary the company, previously Vice
President, General Counsel and
Secretary of Reeves Industries, Inc.,
a manufacturer of apparel textiles
and industrial coated fabrics, from
May 1994 to December 1995; Vice
President, General Counsel and
Secretary of Sprague Technologies,
Inc., a manufacturer of electronic
components, from May 1987 to
December 1993

Anthony D. Pantaleoni Vice President Vice President - Environment, 42 1989
Environment, Health & Safety of the
Health & Safety company

Richard B. Phillips Vice President Vice President - Human 53 1987
Human Resources Resources of the company

David S. Smith Vice President- Vice President - Finance 39 1991
Finance and and Chief Financial Officer
Chief Financial of the company, previously
Officer Vice President - Corporate
Development of the company

Michael L. Raithel Controller Controller of the company 49 1985

Gil A. Dickoff Treasurer Treasurer of the company, 35 1992
previously Assistant
Treasurer of the company
</TABLE>

/12
PART II

The information required by Items 5 through 8 is hereby incorporated by
reference to Pages 14 through 35 of the Annual Report to Shareholders.


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable


PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the
definitive proxy statement which the company will file with the Commission
pursuant to Regulation l4A except that such information with respect to
Executive Officers of the Registrant is included, pursuant to Instruction 3,
paragraph (b) of Item 401 of Regulation S-K, under Part I.


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the
definitive proxy statement which the company will file with the Commission
pursuant to Regulation l4A.


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the
definitive proxy statement which the company will file with the Commission
pursuant to Regulation 14A.


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the
definitive proxy statement which the company will file with the Commission
pursuant to Regulation 14A.



/13
PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

Page
----
(a) Financial Statements and Schedule:
--- ----------------------------------
Independent Auditors' Report 17

Schedule VIII Valuation and Qualifying Accounts 18

The consolidated balance sheets of Crane Co. and subsidiaries as of December
31, 1996 and 1995 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes
in common shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December
31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 and the financial review, appearing on Pages 14
through 35 of Crane Co.'s Annual Report to Shareholders which will be
furnished with the company's proxy statement as required by Regulation 14A,
Rule 14a-3(c), are incorporated herein by reference and are supplemented by
the schedule on Page 16 of this report.

All other statements and schedules for which provision is made in the
applicable regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission have been
omitted because they are not required under related instructions or are
inapplicable, or the information is shown in the financial statements and
related notes.


(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended December 31,
1996.

(c) Exhibits to Form 10-K:
(3) There is incorporated by reference herein:
(a) The company's Certificate of Incorporation contained in Exhibit
D (Certificate of Designation) to the company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1987.
(b) The company's By-laws contained in Exhibit A to the company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December
31, 1995.
(4) Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, including
Indentures:
(a) There is incorporated by reference herein:
(1) Preferred Share Purchase Rights Agreement contained in
Exhibit 1 to the company's Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Commission on July 12, 1988.
(2) Amendment to Preferred Share Purchase Rights Agreement
contained in Exhibit 1 to the company's Report on Form 8-K
filed with the Commission on June 29, 1990.



/14
PART IV (CONTINUED)

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(CONTINUED)

(b) There is incorporated by reference herein:
1) Indenture dated as of April 1,1991 between the Registrant
and the Bank of New York contained in Exhibit 4 to
Registration Statement No. 33-39658.

(10) Material Contracts:
(iii)Compensatory Plans
There is incorporated by reference herein:
(a) The Crane Co. Restricted Stock Award Plan as amended through
May 6, 1996, contained in Exhibit A to the company's Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 1996.
(b) The forms of Employment/Severance Agreement between the company
company and the executive officers (form I) and (form II) which
provide for the continuation of certain employee benefits upon
a change of control as contained in Exhibit C of the company's
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1994.
(c) The E.V.A. incentive compensation plan for executive officers
contained in Exhibit B to the company's annual report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year December 31, 1994.
(d) The Crane Co. Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Award
Plan as amended through May 10, 1993 contained in Exhibit B to
the company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1994.
(e) The indemnification agreements entered into with each director
and executive officer of the company, the form of which is
contained in Exhibit C to the company's definitive proxy
statement filed with the Commission in connection with the
company's April 27, 1987 Annual Meeting.
(f) The Crane Co. Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors
contained in Exhibit E to the company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1988.
(g) The Crane Co. Stock Option Plan as amended as of February 27,
1995 contained in Exhibit 4(a) to the company's Registration
Statement No. 33-59389 on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on
May 17, 1995 .

(11) Statement re computation of per share earnings:
Exhibit A: Computation of net income per share.
(13) Annual report to security holders:
Exhibit B: Annual Report to shareholders for the year ended
December 31, 1996.
(21) Subsidiaries of the Registrant:
Exhibit C: Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
(23) Consent of Experts and Counsel
Exhibit D: Independent auditors' consent.

All other exhibits are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is shown elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/15
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section l3 or l5(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of l934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CRANE CO.
-------------------
(Registrant)
-------------

By / s/ D. S. Smith
-------------------------
D. S. Smith
Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
Date 2/24/97
-------

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of l934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


OFFICERS

/s/ R. S. Evans
-------------------------
R. S. Evans
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Date 2/24/97
-------

/s/ D. S. Smith /s/ M. L. Raithel
------------------------------- -----------------------------
D. S. Smith M. L. Raithel
Vice President-Finance and Controller
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
(Principal Financial Officer) Date 2/24/97
-------
Date 2/24/97
-------


DIRECTORS


/s/ M. Anathan, III /s/ E. T. Bigelow, Jr. /s/ R.S. Forte
- ----------------------- -------------------------- --------------
M. Anathan, III E. T. Bigelow, Jr. R.S. Forte
Date 2/24/97 Date 2/24/97 Date 2/24/97
------- ------- -------

/s/ D.R. Gardner /s/ J. Gaulin /s/ D. C. Minton
- ----------------------- --------------------------- -------------------
D.R. Gardner J. Gaulin D.C. Minton
Date 2/24/97 Date 2/24/97 Date 2/24/97
------- ------- -------

/s/ C.J. Queenan, Jr. /s/ B. Yavitz
---------------------- -----------------------------
C.J. Queenan, Jr. B. Yavitz
Date 2/24/97 Date 2/24/97
------- -------

/16
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT



TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF CRANE CO.:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Crane Co. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 1996 and have issued our report thereon dated
January 27, 1997; such financial statements and report are included in your 1996
Annual Report to Shareholders and are incorporated herein by reference. Our
audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of Crane Co.,
listed in Item 14. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Stamford, Connecticut
January 27, 1997



/17
CRANE CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE VIII - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In Thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


Balance at Additions Balance
Beginning Charged to at End
Description of Year Cost & Expenses Deductions of Year
- ---------------------------------- ---------- --------------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Year Ended December 31, 1996:
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 4,003 $ 3,173 $ 1,905 $5,271

Allowance for cash discounts,
returns and allowances 1,433 14,931 15,072 1,292
------- ------- ------- -------
$ 5,43 $18,104 $16,977 $ 6,563
======== ======= ======= =======

Year Ended December 31, 1995:
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 4,977 $ 2,810 $ 3,784 $4,003

Allowance for cash discounts,
returns and allowances 1,847 13,799 14,213 1,433
------- ------- ------- -------
$ 6,824 $16,609 $17,997 $ 5,436
======= ======= ======= =======
Year Ended December 31, 1994:
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 7,289 $ 4,949 $ 7,261 $4,977

Allowance for cash discounts,
returns and allowances 1,143 17,307 16,603 1,847
------- ------- ------- -------

$ 8,432 $22,256 $23,864 $ 6,824
======= ======= ======= =======

</TABLE>



/18