Kirby Corporation
KEX
#2486
Rank
ยฃ5.49 B
Marketcap
ยฃ104.13
Share price
3.30%
Change (1 day)
67.69%
Change (1 year)
Text size:
1

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(MARK ONE)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO

COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-7615

KIRBY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
NEVADA 74-1884980
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

55 WAUGH DRIVE, SUITE 1000 77007
HOUSTON, TEXAS (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices)
</TABLE>

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (713) 435-1000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON
TITLE OF EACH CLASS WHICH REGISTERED
------------------- ------------------------
<S> <C>
Common Stock -- $.10 Par Value Per Share New York Stock Exchange
</TABLE>

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

As of March 5, 2001, 24,026,370 shares of common stock were outstanding.
The aggregate market value of common stock held by nonaffiliates of the
registrant, based on the closing sales price of such stock on the New York Stock
Exchange on March 2, 2001 was $388,831,000. For purposes of this computation,
all executive officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners of the registrant
are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed an
admission that such executive officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners are
affiliates.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The Company's definitive proxy statement in connection with the Annual
Meeting of the Stockholders to be held April 17, 2001, to be filed with the
Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated by reference into Part
III of this report.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

THE COMPANY

Kirby Corporation (the "Company") was incorporated in Nevada on January 31,
1969 as a subsidiary of Kirby Industries, Inc. ("Industries"). The Company
became publicly owned on September 30, 1976 when its common stock was
distributed pro rata to the stockholders of Industries in connection with the
liquidation of Industries. At that time, the Company was engaged in oil and gas
exploration and production, marine transportation and property and casualty
insurance. Since then, through a series of acquisitions and divestitures, the
Company has become primarily a marine transportation company and is no longer
engaged in the oil and gas or the property and casualty insurance businesses. In
1990, the name of the Company was changed from "Kirby Exploration Company, Inc."
to "Kirby Corporation" because of the changing emphasis of its business.

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to the Company
include the Company and its subsidiaries.

The Company's principal executive office is located at 55 Waugh Drive,
Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77007, and its telephone number is (713) 435-1000.
The Company's mailing address is P.O. Box 1745, Houston, Texas 77251-1745.

BUSINESS AND PROPERTY

The Company, through its subsidiaries, conducts operations in two business
segments: marine transportation and diesel engine services.

The Company's marine transportation segment is engaged in the inland
transportation of chemicals and petrochemicals, refined petroleum products,
black oil products and agricultural chemicals by tank barges, and the offshore
transportation of dry-bulk cargoes by barge. The segment is strictly a provider
of transportation services for its customers and does not assume ownership of
any of the products that it transports. All of the segment's vessels operate
under the U.S. flag and are qualified for domestic trade under the Jones Act.

The Company's diesel engine services segment is engaged in the overhaul and
repair of diesel engines and related parts sales in three distinct markets: the
marine market, providing aftermarket service for vessels powered by large
medium-speed diesel engines utilized in the various inland and offshore marine
industries; the railroad market, providing aftermarket service and parts for the
shortline and the industrial railroad markets; and the power generation and
industrial markets, providing aftermarket service for diesel engines that
provide standby, peak and base load power generation, users of industrial
reduction gears and stand-by generation components of the nuclear industry.

In February 2001, the Company announced that it had entered into a
long-term lease with a subsidiary of The Dow Chemical Company ("Dow") for 94
inland tank barges. The 94 inland tank barges are all double hull and have a
total capacity of 1,335,000 barrels. The inland tank barges were acquired by Dow
as part of the recent merger between Union Carbide Corporation ("Union Carbide")
and Dow.

The Company and its marine transportation and diesel engine services
segments have approximately 2,200 employees, all of which are in the United
States.

1
3

The following table sets forth by segment the revenues, operating profits
and identifiable assets attributable to the principal activities of the Company
for the periods indicated (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues from unaffiliated customers:
Marine transportation.............................. $443,203 $290,956 $244,839
Diesel engine services............................. 69,441 74,648 82,241
-------- -------- --------
Consolidated revenues...................... $512,644 $365,604 $327,080
======== ======== ========
Operating profits:
Marine transportation.............................. $ 78,100 $ 47,525 $ 37,661
Diesel engine services............................. 6,955 7,129 8,050
General corporate expenses......................... (7,053) (4,814) (5,375)
Merger related charges............................. (199) (4,502) --
Impairment of long-lived assets.................... -- -- (8,333)
-------- -------- --------
77,803 45,338 32,003
Equity in earnings of marine affiliates............ 3,394 2,136 946
Equity in earnings of insurance affiliate.......... -- -- 1,325
Loss on sale of insurance affiliate................ -- -- (10,536)
Other income....................................... 1,498 1,029 5,175
Minority interests................................. (966) (273) --
Interest expense................................... (23,917) (12,838) (11,898)
-------- -------- --------
Earnings before taxes on income............ $ 57,812 $ 35,392 $ 17,015
======== ======== ========
Identifiable assets:
Marine transportation.............................. $673,999 $673,882 $301,020
Diesel engine services............................. 45,344 32,890 38,588
-------- -------- --------
719,343 706,772 339,608
Investment in marine affiliates.................... 12,784 14,941 12,795
General corporate assets........................... 17,141 31,684 37,896
-------- -------- --------
Consolidated assets........................ $749,268 $753,397 $390,299
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>

2
4

MARINE TRANSPORTATION

The marine transportation segment is a provider of services by barge for
both the inland and offshore markets. As of March 5, 2001, the equipment owned
or operated by the marine transportation segment comprised 871 inland tank
barges, 215 inland towboats, five inland bowboats, five offshore dry-cargo
barges, five offshore tugboats and one shifting tugboat with the following
specifications and capacities:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NUMBER AVERAGE AGE BARREL
CLASS OF EQUIPMENT IN CLASS (IN YEARS) CAPACITIES
- ------------------ -------- ----------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Inland tank barges:
Regular double hull:
20,000 barrels and under........................ 407 24.9 4,762,000
Over 20,000 barrels............................. 221 18.7 5,940,000
Specialty double hull.............................. 87 24.8 1,442,000
Double side, single bottom......................... 24 24.7 531,000
Single hull:
20,000 barrels and under........................ 36 33.0 589,000
Over 20,000 barrels............................. 59 27.6 1,657,000
Inactive........................................... 37 33.6 646,000
--- ---- ----------
Total inland tank barges................... 871 24.2 15,567,000
=== ==== ==========
Inland towing vessels:
Inland towboats:
600 horsepower.................................. 13 28.3
800 to 1200 horsepower.......................... 125 24.2
1400 to 1900 horsepower......................... 49 24.6
2000 to 2400 horsepower......................... 4 32.0
2900 to 3200 horsepower......................... 11 27.3
4200 to 4800 horsepower......................... 9 26.9
5200 to 6000 horsepower......................... 4 23.8
--- ----
Total inland towboats...................... 215 24.9
=== ====
Inland bowboats...................................... 5 23.0
=== ====
<CAPTION>
DEADWEIGHT
TONNAGE
----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Offshore dry-cargo barges(*)......................... 5 23.6 88,000
=== ==== ======
Offshore tugboats(*)................................. 6 25.2
=== ====
</TABLE>

- ---------------

(*) Includes four barges and five tugboats owned by Dixie Fuels Limited, a
partnership in which the Company owns a 35% interest.

3
5

The following table sets forth the marine transportation segment's revenues
and percentage of such revenues for the periods indicated (dollars in
thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------------- -------------- --------------
REVENUES BY PRODUCT OR OPERATION AMOUNTS % AMOUNTS % AMOUNTS %
- -------------------------------- -------- --- -------- --- -------- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Marine transportation -- Inland:
Liquid petroleum products....... $439,492 99% $288,414 99% $238,170 97%
-------- --- -------- --- -------- ---
Marine transportation -- Offshore:
Liquid petroleum products....... -- -- -- 4,509 2
Dry-bulk........................ 3,711 1 2,542 1 2,160 1
-------- --- -------- --- -------- ---
3,711 1 2,542 1 6,669 3
-------- --- -------- --- -------- ---
$443,203 100% $290,956 100% $244,839 100%
======== === ======== === ======== ===
</TABLE>

MARINE TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY FUNDAMENTALS

The United States possesses a long coastline providing numerous ports and
harbors, complemented by a network of interconnected rivers and canals that
serve the nation as water highways. Recognizing the advantages to commerce, over
the past decades the United States has expanded and improved on its inherent
natural waterways for commerce and growth. The waterway system extends into
numerous states, with over 90% of the United States population served by
domestic shipping.

Today, the United States inland waterway system is one of the world's
busiest and most efficient transportation systems. The nation's waterways are
vital to the United States distribution system, with over 1.1 billion short tons
of cargo moved annually on United States shallow draft waterways. The inland
waterway system extends approximately 26,000 miles, 12,000 miles of which are
generally considered significant for domestic commerce, with 635 shallow draft
ports. These navigable inland waterways link the United States heartland to the
world.

Based on cost and safety, inland barge transportation is the most efficient
means of transporting bulk commodities compared with railroads and trucks. The
cargo capacity of a 30,000 barrel inland tank barge is the equivalent of 40 rail
tank cars or 150 tractor-trailer tank trucks. A typical lower Mississippi River
linehaul tow of 15 barges has the carrying capacity of approximately 225 rail
tank cars or approximately 870 tractor-trailer tank trucks. The 225 rail cars
would require a freight train approximately 2 3/4 miles long and the 870
tractor-trailer tank trucks would stretch approximately 35 miles, assuming a
safety margin of 150 ft. between the trucks. The Company's tank barge fleet
capacity of 15.6 million barrels equates to approximately 21,000 rail cars and
approximately 78,000 tractor-trailer tank trucks. In addition, in studies
comparing inland water transportation to railroads and trucks, shallow draft
water transportation has been proven to be the most energy efficient and
environmentally friendly method of moving bulk raw materials. One ton of bulk
product can be carried 514 miles by inland barge on one gallon of fuel, compared
with 202 miles by rail and 59 miles by truck.

Inland barge transportation is also the safest mode of transportation in
the United States. It generally involves less urban exposure than rail or truck.
It operates on a system with few crossing junctures and in areas relatively
remote from population centers. These factors generally reduce both the number
and impact of waterway incidents. For the amount of tonnage carried, barge
spills generally occur quite infrequently.

INLAND TANK BARGE INDUSTRY

The Company's marine transportation segment operates within the United
States inland tank barge industry, a diverse and independent mixture of
integrated transportation companies, small operators and captive fleets owned by
United States refining and petrochemical companies. The inland tank barge
industry provides marine transportation of bulk liquid cargoes for customers
and, in the case of captives, for their own account, along the United States
inland waterway system. Among the most significant segments of this industry are
the transporters of chemicals and petrochemicals, refined petroleum products,
black oil products

4
6

and agricultural chemicals. The Company operates in each of these segments. The
use of marine transportation by the petroleum and petrochemical industry is a
major reason for the location of domestic refineries and petrochemical
facilities on navigable inland waterways and along the Gulf Coast. Much of the
United States farm belt is likewise situated with access to the inland waterway
system, relying on marine transportation of farm products, including
agricultural chemicals. The Company's principal distribution system encompasses
the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Brownsville, Texas, to St. Marks, Florida,
the Mississippi River System and the Houston Ship Channel. The Mississippi River
System includes the Arkansas, Illinois, Missouri, Ohio, Red, Tennessee and Black
Warrier rivers and the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway.

The total number of tank barges that operate in the inland waters of the
United States declined from approximately 4,200 in 1981 to approximately 2,900
in 1993 and has remained relatively constant at 2,900 since 1993. The Company
believes this decrease primarily resulted from: the increasing age of the
domestic tank barge fleet, resulting in scrapping; rates inadequate to justify
new construction; a reduction in tax incentives, which previously encouraged
speculative construction of new equipment; stringent operating standards to
adequately cope with safety and environmental risk; the elimination of
government programs supporting small refineries which created a demand for tank
barge services; and an increase in environmental regulations that mandate
expensive equipment modification, which some owners are unwilling or unable to
undertake given current rate levels and the age of their fleets.

The cost of hull work for required annual Coast Guard certifications, as
well as general safety and environmental concerns, forces operators to
periodically reassess their ability to recover maintenance costs. Previously,
tax and financing incentives to operators and investors to construct tank
barges, including short-life tax depreciation, investment tax credits and
government guaranteed financing, led to growth in the supply of domestic tank
barges to a peak of approximately 4,200 in 1981. The tax incentives have since
been eliminated; however, the government guaranteed financing programs, dormant
since the mid-eighties, have been more actively used since 1993. The supply of
tank barges resulting from the earlier programs has slowly aligned with demand
for tank barge services, primarily through attrition, as discussed above.

While the United States tank barge fleet has decreased in size, domestic
production of petrochemicals, a major component of the industry's revenues, has
continued to increase annually. Growth in the economy, continued growth of the
United States population and the continued substitution of plastics and
synthetics in a wide variety of products have been major factors behind the
increase of capacity in the petrochemical industry. Texas and Louisiana, which
are within the Company's area of operations, currently account for approximately
80% of the total United States production of petrochemicals.

Advanced technology in recent years in steel coating, paint and other
advances have added to the life expectancy of inland tank barges. The average
age of the nation's tank barge fleet is over 21 years old, with 22% of the fleet
built in the last 10 years. Single hull barges comprise approximately 15% of the
nation's tank barge fleet, with an average age of 29 years. These single hull
barges are being driven from the nation's tank barge fleet by market forces,
stringent environmental regulations and rising maintenance costs associated with
maintaining older single hull barges.

Over the years, the marine transportation industry as a whole has overbuilt
periodically. However, the Company believes that the current consolidating
industry will be less prone to overbuilding of the nation's tank barge fleet. Of
the approximately 635 tank barges built since 1989, 109, or 17%, were built by
the Company and by Hollywood Marine, Inc. ("Hollywood Marine") prior to its
merger with the Company. The balance was primarily replacement barges for single
hull barges removed from service, special purpose barges or barges constructed
for specific contracts.

The Company's marine transportation segment is also engaged in ocean-going
dry-cargo barge operations, providing transportation of dry-bulk cargoes. Such
cargoes are transported primarily between domestic ports along the Gulf of
Mexico and along the Atlantic Seaboard, with occasional trips to Caribbean and
South American ports.

5
7

COMPETITION IN THE INLAND TANK BARGE INDUSTRY

The Company's marine transportation segment operates in the competitive
marine transportation market for commodities transported on the Mississippi
River System, the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the Houston Ship Channel. The
industry has become increasingly concentrated in recent years as many companies
have gone out of business or have been acquired. Since 1989, the Company has
acquired the inland transportation fleets of nine inland tank barge companies
and recently leased the inland tank barges of a chemical company, thereby
increasing its inland tank barge fleet from 71 barges in 1988 to 871 today. The
competition has historically been based primarily on price; however, the
industry's customers, through an increased emphasis on safety, the environment,
quality and a greater reliance on a "single source" supply of services, are more
frequently requiring that their supplier of inland tank barge services have the
capability to handle a variety of tank barge requirements, offer distribution
capability throughout the inland waterway system, and offer flexibility, safety,
environmental responsibility, financial responsibility, adequate insurance and
quality of service consistent with the customer's own operations.

The direct competitors are primarily noncaptive marine transportation
companies. "Captive" companies are those companies that are owned by major oil
and/or petrochemical companies which, although competing in the inland tank
barge market to varying extents, primarily transport cargoes for their own
account. The Company is the largest inland tank barge carrier, based on its 871
barges and 15.6 million barrels of available capacity. It currently operates
approximately 30% of the total domestic inland tank barge capacity.

While the Company competes primarily with other tank barge companies, it
also competes with companies owning refined product and chemical pipelines, rail
tank cars and tractor-trailer tank trucks. As noted above, the Company believes
that inland marine transportation of bulk liquid products enjoys a substantial
cost advantage over rail and truck transportation. The Company believes that
refined products and chemical pipelines, although often a less expensive form of
transportation than inland tank barges, are not as adaptable to diverse products
and are generally limited to fixed point-to-point distribution of commodities in
high volumes over extended periods of time.

PRODUCTS TRANSPORTED

During 2000, the Company's marine transportation segment moved over 50
million tons of liquid cargo on the United States inland waterway system.
Products transported for its customers comprised the following: chemicals and
petrochemicals, refined petroleum products, black oil products and agricultural
chemicals.

Chemicals and Petrochemicals. Bulk liquid chemicals and petrochemicals
transported include such products as benzene, styrene, methanol, acrylonitrile,
xylene and caustic soda, all consumed in the production of paper, fibers and
plastics. Pressurized products, including butadiene, isobutane, propylene,
butane and propane, all requiring pressurized conditions to remain in stable
liquid form, are also transported. The transporting of chemical and
petrochemical products represents approximately 60% of the segment's revenues.
Customers shipping these products include the major chemical and petrochemical
companies in the United States.

Refined Petroleum Products. Refined petroleum products transported include
the various blends of gasoline, jet fuel, naphtha and diesel fuel, and represent
approximately 20% of the segment's revenues. Customers include the major oil and
refining companies in the United States.

Black Oil Products. Black oil products transported include such products
as asphalt, No. 6 fuel oil, coker feed, vacuum gas oil and crude oil, as well as
ship bunkers (ship fuel). Such products represent approximately 10% of the
segment's revenues. Black oil customers consist primarily of United States
refining companies, marketers and end users that transport black oil products
between refineries and storage terminals. Ship bunkers customers include the
major oil companies and oil traders.

Agricultural Chemicals. Agricultural chemicals transported, representing
approximately 10% of the segment's revenues, include anhydrous ammonia and
nitrogen-based liquid fertilizer, as well as industrial ammonia. Agricultural
chemical customers consist mainly of United States producers of such products.

6
8

DEMAND DRIVERS IN THE INLAND TANK BARGE INDUSTRY

Demand for inland tank barge transportation services is a function of the
production volumes of the bulk liquid commodities efficiently transported by
barge. Demand for marine transportation of the segment's four primary commodity
groups, chemicals and petrochemicals, refined petroleum products, black oil
products and agricultural chemicals, is based on different sets of
circumstances. While the demand drivers of each commodity are different, the
Company has the flexibility in many cases of re-allocating equipment to stronger
demand products as economics dictate.

Bulk chemical and petrochemical volumes generally track the general
domestic economy and correlate to the United States Gross Domestic Production.
Volumes are measured by the production of products used in housing, automobiles,
clothing and consumer goods. The other significant component of petrochemical
production consists of gasoline additives, the demand for which closely
parallels the United States domestic gasoline consumption.

Refined petroleum product volumes can be tied closely to United States
domestic gasoline consumption, with the principal drivers being vehicle usage,
air travel and prevailing weather conditions. Volumes also relate to
production/demand balances within the Midwest region. Generally, gasoline and
related petroleum products, such as heating oil, are exported from the Gulf
Coast where refining capacity exceeds demand. The Midwest is a net importer of
such products. Demand for tank barge transportation from the Gulf Coast to the
Midwest region reflects the relative price differentials of Gulf Coast
production to Canadian imports or production in the Northeast.

The demand for black oil products, including ship bunkers, varies with the
type of product transported. Asphalt shipments are generally seasonal, with a
higher shipping season during April through November, paralleling the warmer
weather. Other black oil shipments are more stable, depending on the
requirements of the United States oil refineries.

Demand for marine transportation of agricultural fertilizer is directly
related to domestic nitrogen based fertilizer consumption, of which corn, cotton
and wheat production is the best indicator. The nitrogen based liquid
fertilizers carried by the Company are distributed from United States
manufacturing facilities, generally located in the southern United States where
natural gas feedstocks are plentiful, and from imported sources. Such products
are delivered to the numerous small terminals and distributors along the
northern rivers in the heartland of the United States.

MARINE TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS

The marine transportation segment operates a fleet of 871 inland tank
barges, 215 inland towboats and five inland bowboats, one offshore dry-cargo
barge and one offshore tugboat, and manages the operations of a bulk liquid
terminal. Through partnerships, the segment operates four offshore dry-cargo
barges, four offshore tugboats, one shifting tugboat and two liquid tank
terminals.

Inland Operations. The segment's inland operations are conducted through a
wholly owned subsidiary, Kirby Inland Marine, Inc. ("Kirby Inland Marine"), and
its subsidiaries. Kirby Inland Marine's operations consist of the Canal,
Linehaul and River fleets, as well as barge fleeting services performed by
Western Towing Company ("Western"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Kirby Inland
Marine.

The Canal fleet transports processed chemicals, petrochemical feedstocks,
pressurized products, refined petroleum products and black oil products along
the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, the Mississippi River below Baton Rouge,
Louisiana, and the Houston Ship Channel. Processed chemicals and certain
pressurized products are moved to waterfront terminals and chemical plants.
Petrochemical feedstocks and certain pressurized products are transported from
one refinery to another refinery for further processing. Refined petroleum
products are transported to waterfront terminals along the Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway for distribution. Certain black oil products are transported to
waterfront terminals and chemical plants, and products such as No. 6 fuel oil
are transported directly to the end users.

7
9

The Linehaul fleet transports processed chemicals, petrochemical
feedstocks, agricultural chemicals and lube oils along the Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway, Mississippi River and the Illinois and Ohio rivers. Loaded tank barges
are collected at Baton Rouge from Gulf Coast refineries and chemical plants, and
are transported from Baton Rouge upriver to waterfront terminals and plants on
the Mississippi, Illinois and Ohio rivers on regularly scheduled linehaul tows.
Barges are dropped off and picked up going up and downriver.

The River fleet transports processed chemicals, petrochemical feedstocks,
refined petroleum products, agricultural chemicals and black oil products along
the Mississippi River System above Baton Rouge. Petrochemical feedstocks and
processed chemicals are transported to waterfront chemical and petrochemical
plants, while refined petroleum products and agricultural chemicals are
transported to waterfront terminals. The River fleet operates unit tows, where a
towboat and generally a static group of barges operate on consecutive voyages
between a loading point and a discharge point.

The transportation of processed chemicals, petrochemical feedstocks and
pressurized products is generally consistent throughout the year. Transportation
of refined petroleum products, certain black oil products and agricultural
chemicals is generally more seasonal. Movements of refined petroleum products
generally increase during the summer driving season. Movements of black oil
products, such as heating oil, generally increase during the winter months,
while movements of asphalt products generally increase in the spring through
fall months. Movements of agricultural chemicals generally increase during the
spring and fall planting seasons.

The marine transportation segment moves and handles a broad range of
sophisticated cargoes. To meet the specific requirements of the cargoes
transported, the tank barges may be equipped with self-contained heating
systems, high-capacity pumps, pressurized tanks, refrigeration units, stainless
steel tanks, aluminum tanks or specialty coated tanks. Of the 871 tank barges
owned or operated, 734 are clean products or chemical barges, 57 are black oil
barges, 62 are pressure barges, 11 are anhydrous ammonia barges and 7 are
specialty barges.

The fleet of 215 inland towboats ranges from 600 to 6000 horsepower.
Towboats in the 600 to 1200 horsepower classes provide power for barges used by
the Canal and Linehaul fleets on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the Houston
Ship Channel. Towboats in the 1400 to 6000 horsepower classes provide power for
both the River and Linehaul fleets on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the
Mississippi River System. Towboats above 2000 horsepower are typically used in
the Mississippi River System to move River fleet unit tows and provide Linehaul
fleet towing. Based on the capabilities of the individual towboats used in the
Mississippi River System, the tows range from River fleet unit tows of 10,000
tons to 30,000 ton Linehaul fleet tows.

Marine transportation services are conducted under long-term contracts,
ranging from one to 10 years, with customers with whom the Company has
long-standing relationships, as well as under short-term and spot contracts.
Currently, approximately 70% of the revenues are derived from term contracts and
30% are derived from spot market movements.

For increased environmental protection, all of the inland tank barges used
in the transportation of industrial chemicals are of double hull construction
and, where applicable, are capable of controlling vapor emissions during loading
and discharging operations in compliance with occupational health and safety
regulations and air quality concerns.

Through the Company's acquisition of other inland tank barge operators in
recent years, the marine transportation segment has become one of the few inland
tank barge operators with the ability to offer to its customers distribution
capabilities throughout the Mississippi River System and the Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway. Such consolidation offers economies of scale resulting from the
ability to match tank barges, towboats, products and destinations more
efficiently.

Through the Company's proprietary vessel management computer system, the
fleet of barges and towboats is dispatched from centralized dispatch at the
corporate office. The towboats are equipped with a satellite positioning and
communication system that automatically transmits the exact location of the
towboat every hour. Electronic orders are communicated to the vessel personnel,
with reports of towing activities
8
10

communicated electronically back to the corporate office. The electronic
interface between the corporate office and the vessel personnel enables more
effective matching of customer needs to barge capabilities, thereby maximizing
utilization of the tank barge and towboat fleet.

Western operates what the Company believes is the largest commercial tank
barge fleeting service (temporary barge storage facilities) in the ports of
Houston, Corpus Christi, Galveston and Freeport, Texas, and on the Mississippi
River at Baton Rouge and New Orleans, Louisiana. Western provides service for
Kirby Inland Marine's barges, as well as outside customers, transferring barges
within the areas noted, as well as fleeting barges.

Kirby Terminals, Inc. ("Kirby Terminals"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company, as managing partner, manages the operations of Matagorda Terminal Ltd.
and Red River Terminals, LLC, a Texas limited partnership and Louisiana limited
liability company, respectively, in each of which Kirby Terminals owns a 50%
interest. In addition, Kirby Terminals manages the operations of a terminal in
Lake Charles, Louisiana. All three operations are bulk liquid terminals.

Kirby Logistics Management, Inc. ("Kirby Logistics"), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Kirby Terminals, offers barge tankerman services and related
distribution services primarily to the Company and to some third parties.

Offshore Operations. The segment's offshore operations are conducted
through a wholly owned subsidiary, Dixie Offshore Transportation Company ("Dixie
Offshore"), and its subsidiary. The offshore fleet comprises one ocean-going
dry-bulk barge and tugboat unit owned by the Company, and equipment owned
through a limited partnership, Dixie Fuels Limited ("Dixie Fuels"), in which a
subsidiary of Dixie Offshore, Dixie Bulk Transport, Inc. ("Dixie Bulk"), owns a
35% interest.

The ocean-going dry-bulk barge and tugboat unit is engaged in the
transportation of dry-bulk commodities including bauxite, sugar, limestone rock,
grain, coal and scrap steel, primarily between domestic ports along the Gulf of
Mexico and along the Atlantic Seaboard, with occasional trips to Caribbean and
South American ports.

Dixie Bulk, as general partner, manages the operations of Dixie Fuels,
which operates a fleet of four ocean-going dry-bulk barges, four ocean-going
tugboats and one shifting tugboat. The remaining 65% interest in Dixie Fuels is
owned by Electric Fuels Corporation ("EFC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of
Progress Energy, Inc. ("Progress Energy"). Dixie Fuels operates primarily under
term contracts of affreightment, including a contract that expires in the year
2002 with EFC to transport coal across the Gulf of Mexico to Progress Energy's
facility at Crystal River, Florida.

Dixie Fuels also has a long-term contract with Holnam, Inc. ("Holnam") to
transport Holnam's limestone requirements from a facility adjacent to the
Progress Energy facility at Crystal River to Holnam's plant in Theodore,
Alabama. In 2000, the contract, which expires in 2002, was renewed and extended
for up to 10 additional years under revised terms. The Holnam contract provides
cargo for a portion of the return voyage for the vessels that carry coal to
Progress Energy's Crystal River facility. Dixie Fuels is also engaged in the
transportation of coal, fertilizer and other bulk cargoes on a short-term basis
between domestic ports and the transportation of grain from domestic ports to
ports primarily in the Caribbean Basin.

Dixie Bulk, as general partner, also managed the operations of Dixie Fuels
II, Limited ("Dixie Fuels II"), which owned an ocean-going dry-bulk and
container barge and an ocean-going tugboat. The remaining 50% interest in Dixie
Fuels II was owned by EFC. The barge and the tugboat were sold in 2000.

CONTRACTS AND CUSTOMERS

The majority of the marine transportation contracts with its customers are
for terms of one year. The Company also operates under longer term contracts
with certain other customers. These companies have generally been customers of
the Company's marine transportation segment for several years, and management
anticipates a continuing relationship, there is no assurance that any individual
contract will be renewed. Dow,

9
11

with which the Company has a contract through 2006, accounted for 10% of the
Company's revenues in 2000, 12% in 1999 and 13% in 1998.

EMPLOYEES

The Company's marine transportation segment has approximately 1,850
employees, of which approximately 1,400 are vessel crew members. None of the
segment's operations are subject to collective bargaining.

PROPERTIES

The principal office of Kirby Inland Marine is located in Houston, Texas,
in the Company's facilities under a lease that expires in April 2006. Kirby
Inland Marine's operating locations are on the Mississippi River at Baton Rouge,
Louisiana, New Orleans, Louisiana, and Greenville, Mississippi, two locations in
Houston, Texas, on and near the Houston Ship Channel, and in Corpus Christi,
Texas. The Baton Rouge, New Orleans and Houston facilities are owned, and the
Greenville and Corpus Christi facilities are leased. Western's and Kirby
Logistics' principal offices are located in facilities owned by Kirby Inland
Marine in Houston, Texas, near the Houston Ship Channel. The principal office of
Dixie Offshore is in Belle Chasse, Louisiana, in owned facilities.

GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS

General. The Company's marine transportation operations are subject to
regulation by the United States Coast Guard, federal laws, state laws and
certain international conventions.

Most of the Company's inland tank barges are inspected by the United States
Coast Guard and carry certificates of inspection. The Company's inland and
offshore towing vessels and offshore dry-bulk barges are not subject to United
States Coast Guard inspection requirements. The Company's offshore towing
vessels and offshore dry-bulk barges are built to American Bureau of Shipping
("ABS") classification standards and are inspected periodically by ABS to
maintain the vessels in class. The crews employed by the Company aboard vessels,
including captains, pilots, engineers, tankermen and ordinary seamen, are
licensed by the United States Coast Guard.

The Company is required by various governmental agencies to obtain
licenses, certificates and permits for its vessels depending upon such factors
as the cargo transported, the waters in which the vessels operate and other
factors. The Company is of the opinion that the Company's vessels have obtained
and can maintain all required licenses, certificates and permits required by
such governmental agencies for the foreseeable future.

The Company believes that additional safety and environmental related
regulations may be imposed on the marine industry in the form of personnel
licensing, navigation equipment and contingency planning requirements.
Generally, the Company endorses the anticipated additional regulations and
believes it is currently operating to standards at least the equal of such
anticipated additional regulations.

Jones Act. The Jones Act is a federal cabotage law that restricts domestic
marine transportation in the United States to vessels built and registered in
the United States, manned by United States citizens, and owned and operated by
United States citizens. For corporations to qualify as United States citizens
for the purpose of domestic trade, 75% of the corporations' beneficial
stockholders must be United States citizens. The Company presently meets all of
the requirements of the Jones Act for its owned vessels.

Compliance with United States ownership requirements of the Jones Act is
very important to the operations of the Company, and the loss of Jones Act
status could have a significant negative effect for the Company. The Company
monitors the citizenship requirements under the Jones Act of its employees and
beneficial stockholders, and will take action as necessary to ensure compliance
with the Jones Act requirements.

The requirements that the Company's vessels be United States built and
manned by United States citizens, the crewing requirements and material
requirements of the Coast Guard, and the application of United States labor and
tax laws significantly increase the cost of U.S. flag vessels when compared with

10
12

comparable foreign flag vessels. The Company's business would be adversely
affected if the Jones Act was to be modified so as to permit foreign competition
that is not subject to the same United States government imposed burdens.

During the past several years, the Jones Act has come under attack by
interests seeking to facilitate foreign flag competition for trades reserved for
U.S. flag vessels under the Jones Act. These efforts have been consistently
defeated by large margins in the United States Congress. The Company believes
that continued efforts will be made to modify or eliminate the cabotage
provisions of the Jones Act. If such efforts are successful, it could have an
adverse effect on the Company.

User Taxes. Federal legislation requires that inland marine transportation
companies pay a user tax based on propulsion fuel used by vessels engaged in
trade along the inland waterways that are maintained by the United States Army
Corps of Engineers. Such user taxes are designed to help defray the costs
associated with replacing major components of the inland waterway system, such
as locks and dams. A significant portion of the inland waterways on which the
Company's vessels operate is maintained by the Corps of Engineers.

The Company presently pays a federal fuel tax of 24.3 cents per gallon,
reflecting a 4.3 cents per gallon transportation fuel tax for deficit reduction
imposed in October 1993 and a 20 cents per gallon waterway use tax. There can be
no assurance that additional user taxes may not be imposed in the future.

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS

The Company's operations are affected by various regulations and
legislation enacted for protection of the environment by the United States
government, as well as many coastal and inland waterway states.

Water Pollution Regulations. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of
1972, as amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977, the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1981 and the Oil Pollution Act of
1990 ("OPA") impose strict prohibitions against the discharge of oil and its
derivatives or hazardous substances into the navigable waters of the United
States. These acts impose civil and criminal penalties for any prohibited
discharges and impose substantial strict liability for cleanup of these
discharges and any associated damages. Certain states also have water pollution
laws that prohibit discharges into waters that traverse the state or adjoin the
state, and impose civil and criminal penalties and liabilities similar in nature
to those imposed under federal laws.

The OPA and various state laws of similar intent substantially increased
over historic levels the statutory liability of owners and operators of vessels
for oil spills, both in terms of limit of liability and scope of damages.

One of the most important requirements under the OPA is that all newly
constructed tank barges engaged in the transportation of oil and petroleum in
the United States be double hulled, and all existing single hull tank barges be
retrofitted with double hulls or phased out of domestic service by 2015.

The Company manages its exposure to losses from potential discharges of
pollutants through the use of well maintained and equipped vessels, the safety,
training and environmental programs of the Company, and the Company's insurance
program. In addition, the Company uses double hull barges in the transportation
of more hazardous chemical substances. There can be no assurance, however, that
any new regulations or requirements or any discharge of pollutants by the
Company will not have an adverse effect on the Company.

Financial Responsibility Requirement. Commencing with the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended, vessels over 300 gross tons operating
in the Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States have been required to
maintain evidence of financial ability to satisfy statutory liabilities for oil
and hazardous substance water pollution. This evidence is in the form of a
Certificate of Financial Responsibility ("COFR") issued by the United States
Coast Guard. The majority of the Company's tank barges are subject to this COFR
requirement, and the Company has fully complied with this requirement since its
inception. The Company does not foresee any current or future difficulty in
maintaining the COFR certificates under current rules.

11
13

Clean Air Regulations. The Federal Clean Air Act of 1979 ("Clean Air Act")
requires states to draft State Implementation Plans ("SIPs") designed to reduce
atmospheric pollution to levels mandated by this act. Several SIPs provide for
the regulation of barge loading and degassing emissions. The implementation of
these regulations requires a reduction of hydrocarbon emissions released into
the atmosphere during the loading of most petroleum products and the degassing
and cleaning of barges for maintenance or change of cargo. These regulations
require operators who operate in these states to install vapor control equipment
on their barges. The Company expects that future toxic emission regulations will
be developed and will apply this same technology to many chemicals that are
handled by barge. Most of the Company's barges engaged in the transportation of
petrochemicals, chemicals and refined products are already equipped with vapor
control systems. Additionally, in Texas an SIP is being considered with respect
to diesel engine exhaust emissions from towboats. The Texas SIP under
consideration may require use of low sulfur and emulsified fuel and installation
of catalytic convertors on towboat engines. Although a risk exists that new
regulations could require significant capital expenditures by the Company and
otherwise increase the Company's costs, the Company believes that, based upon
the regulations that have been proposed thus far, no material capital
expenditures beyond those currently contemplated by the Company and no material
increase in costs are likely to be required.

Contingency Plan Requirement. The OPA and several state statutes of
similar intent require the majority of the vessels and terminals operated by the
Company to maintain approved oil spill contingency plans as a condition of
operation. The Company has approved plans that comply with these requirements.
The OPA also requires development of regulations for hazardous substance spill
contingency plans. The United States Coast Guard has not yet promulgated these
regulations; however, the Company anticipates that they will not be
significantly more difficult to comply with than the oil spill plans.

Occupational Health Regulations. The Company's vessel operations are
primarily regulated by the United States Coast Guard for occupational health
standards. The Company's shore personnel are subject to the United States
Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations. The Coast Guard has
promulgated regulations that address the exposure to benzene vapors, which
require the Company, as well as other operators, to perform extensive
monitoring, medical testing and record keeping of seamen engaged in the handling
of benzene and benzene containing cargo transported aboard vessels. It is
expected that these regulations may serve as a prototype for similar health
regulations relating to the carriage of other hazardous liquid cargoes. The
Company believes that it is in compliance with the provisions of the regulations
that have been adopted and does not believe that the adoption of any further
regulations will impose additional material requirements on the Company. There
can be no assurance, however, that claims will not be made against the Company
for work related illness or injury, or that the further adoption of health
regulations will not adversely affect the Company.

Insurance. The Company's marine transportation operations are subject to
the hazards associated with operating vessels carrying large volumes of bulk
cargo in a marine environment. These hazards include the risk of loss of or
damage to the Company's vessels, damage to third parties as a result of
collision, fire or explosion, loss or contamination of cargo, personal injury of
employees and third parties, and pollution and other environmental damages. The
Company maintains insurance coverage against these hazards. Risk of loss of or
damage to the Company's vessels is insured through hull insurance currently
insuring approximately $775 million in hull values. Liabilities such as
collision, cargo, environmental, personal injury and general liability are
insured up to $500 million per occurrence.

Environmental Protection. The Company has a number of programs that were
implemented to further its commitment to environmental responsibility in its
operations. One such program is environmental audits of barge cleaning vendors
principally directed at management of cargo residues and barge cleaning wastes.
Others are the participation by the Company in the American Waterways Operators
Responsible Carrier program and the Chemical Manufacturer's Association
Responsible Care program, both of which are oriented towards continuously
reducing the barge industry's and chemical and petroleum industries' impact on
the environment, including the distribution services area.

12
14

Safety. The Company manages its exposure to the hazards associated with
its business through safety, training and preventive maintenance efforts. The
Company places considerable emphasis on safety through a program oriented toward
extensive monitoring of safety performance for the purpose of identifying trends
and initiating corrective action, and for the purpose of rewarding personnel
achieving superior safety performance. The Company believes that its safety
performance consistently places it among the industry leaders as evidenced by
what it believes are lower injury frequency and pollution incident levels than
many of its competitors.

Training. The Company believes that among the major elements of a
successful and productive work force are effective training programs. The
Company also believes that training in the proper performance of a job enhances
both the safety and quality of the service provided. New technology, regulatory
compliance, personnel safety, quality and environmental concerns create
additional demands for training. The Company fully endorses the development and
institution of effective training programs.

Centralized training is provided through the training department, which is
charged with developing, conducting and maintaining training programs for the
benefit of all of the Company's operating entities. It is also responsible for
ensuring that training programs are both consistent and effective. The Company's
training facility includes state-of-the-art equipment and instruction aids,
including a working towboat, tank barge and shore tank facilities. During 2000,
approximately 2,300 certificates were issued for the completion of courses at
the training facility.

Quality. The Company has made a substantial commitment to the
implementation, maintenance and improvement of Quality Assurance Systems in
compliance with the International Quality Standard, ISO 9002. Currently, all of
the Company's marine transportation units serving the liquid and dry-cargo
markets have been certified, many of them earning "firsts" among their peers.
These Quality Assurance Systems have enabled both shore and vessel personnel to
effectively manage the changes which occur in the working environment. In
addition, such Quality Assurance Systems have enhanced the Company's already
excellent safety and environmental performance.

DIESEL ENGINE SERVICES

The Company is presently engaged in the overhaul and repair of large
medium-speed diesel engines and related parts sales through Kirby Engine
Systems, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and its three wholly
owned operating subsidiaries, Marine Systems, Inc. ("Marine Systems"), Engine
Systems, Inc. ("Engine Systems") and Rail Systems, Inc. ("Rail Systems").
Through these three operating subsidiaries, the Company sells genuine
replacement parts, provides service mechanics to overhaul and repair engines and
reduction gears, and maintains facilities to rebuild component parts or entire
engines or entire reduction gears. The Company serves the marine market and
stand-by power generation market throughout the United States, Pacific Rim and
Caribbean, the shortline and industrial railroad markets throughout the United
States, other industrial markets such as cement, paper and mining in the Midwest
and Southeast, and components of the nuclear industry worldwide. No single
customer of the diesel engine services segment accounted for more than 10% of
the Company's revenues in 2000, 1999, or 1998. The diesel engine services
segment also provides service to the Company's marine transportation segment,
which accounted for 3% of the diesel engine services segment's total 2000
revenues, approximately 1% of its revenues for 1999 and 4% in 1998. Such
revenues are eliminated in consolidation and not included in the table below.

In October 2000, Marine Systems completed the acquisition of the Powerway
Division of Covington Detroit Diesel-Allison, Inc. ("Powerway") for $1,428,000
in cash. In November 2000, Marine Systems completed the acquisition of West
Kentucky Machine Shop, Inc. ("West Kentucky") for an aggregate consideration
(before post-closing adjustments) of $6,674,000, consisting of $6,629,000 in
cash, the assumption of $20,000 of West Kentucky's existing debt and $25,000 of
merger costs. The acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. With the acquisition of Powerway, the Company became the sole
distributor of aftermarket parts and service for Alco engines throughout the
United States for marine, power generation and industrial applications. With the
acquisition of West Kentucky, the Company increased its distributorship
capabilities to the marine industry with Falk Corporation ("Falk"), a reduction
13
15

gear manufacturer, and also became a certified industrial renew center for Falk
reduction gears for industrial applications in the Midwest. In October 2000,
Engine Systems entered into a distributorship agreement with Cooper Energy
Services, Inc. ("Cooper") to become the exclusive worldwide distributor for
Enterprise and Cooper-Bessemer KSV engines to the nuclear industry.

The following table sets forth the revenues for the diesel engine services
segment for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------------- ------------- -------------
AMOUNTS % AMOUNTS % AMOUNTS %
------- --- ------- --- ------- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Overhaul and repairs............... $38,228 55% $40,139 54% $43,107 52%
Direct parts sales................. 31,213 45 34,509 46 39,134 48
------- --- ------- --- ------- ---
$69,441 100% $74,648 100% $82,241 100%
======= === ======= === ======= ===
</TABLE>

MARINE OPERATIONS

The Company is engaged in the overhaul and repair of diesel engines and
reduction gears, line boring, block welding services and related parts sales for
customers in the marine industry. The Company services tugboats and towboats
powered by large diesel engines utilized in the inland and offshore barge
industries. It also services marine equipment and offshore drilling equipment
used in the offshore petroleum exploration and oil service industry, marine
equipment used in the offshore commercial fishing industry and vessels owned by
the United States government.

The Company has marine operations throughout the United States providing
in-house and in-field repair capabilities and related parts sales. These
operations are located in Chesapeake, Virginia, Houma, Louisiana, Harvey,
Louisiana, Seattle, Washington, and two locations in Paducah, Kentucky. The
operation based in Chesapeake, Virginia, is an authorized distributor for 17
eastern states and the Caribbean for the Electro-Motive Division of General
Motors Corporation ("EMD"). The marine operations based in Houma, Louisiana,
Paducah, Kentucky, and Seattle, Washington, are nonexclusive authorized service
centers for EMD providing service and related parts sales. All of the marine
locations are authorized distributors for Falk reduction gears, and all of the
marine locations except for Harvey, Louisiana, are also authorized distributors
for Alco engines. The Chesapeake, Virginia, operation concentrates on East Coast
inland and offshore dry-bulk, tank barge and harbor docking operators, the
United States Coast Guard and aircraft carriers of the United States Navy. The
Houma and Harvey, Louisiana, operations concentrate on the inland and offshore
barge and oil services industries. The Paducah, Kentucky, operations concentrate
on the inland river towboat and barge operators and the Great Lakes carriers.
The Seattle, Washington, operation primarily concentrates on the offshore
commercial fishing industry, the United States Coast Guard and United States
Navy, and other customers in Alaska, Hawaii and the Pacific Rim. The Company's
emphasis is on service to its customers, and it can send its crews from any of
its locations to service customers' equipment anywhere in the world.

MARINE CUSTOMERS

The Company's major marine customers include inland and offshore dry-bulk
and tank barge operators, oil service companies, petrochemical companies,
offshore fishing companies, other marine transportation entities, and the United
States Coast Guard and Navy.

Since the marine business is linked to the relative health of the diesel
power tugboat and towboat industry, the offshore supply boat industry, the oil
and gas drilling industry, the military and the offshore commercial fishing
industry, there is no assurance that its present gross revenues can be
maintained in the future. The results of the diesel engine services industry are
largely tied to the industries it serves and, therefore, are influenced by the
cycles of such industries.

14
16

MARINE COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS

The Company's primary competitors are approximately 10 independent diesel
services companies and other EMD authorized distributors and authorized service
centers. Certain operators of diesel powered marine equipment also elect to
maintain in-house service capabilities. While price is a major determinant in
the competitive process, reputation, consistent quality, expeditious service,
experienced personnel, access to parts inventories and market presence are
significant factors. A substantial portion of the Company's business is obtained
by competitive bids. However, the Company has entered into preferential service
agreements with certain large operators of diesel powered marine equipment.
These agreements provide such operators with one source of support and service
for all of their requirements at pre-negotiated prices.

Many of the parts sold by the Company are generally available from other
service providers, but the Company is one of a limited number of authorized
resellers of EMD parts. The Company is also the only marine distributor for Falk
reduction gears and the only distributor for Alco engines throughout the United
States. Although the Company believes it is unlikely, termination of its
distributorship relationship with EMD or its authorized service center
relationships with other EMD distributors could adversely affect its business.

POWER GENERATION AND INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS

The Company is engaged in the overhaul and repair of diesel engines and
reduction gears, line boring, block welding service and related parts sales for
power generation and industrial customers. The Company is also engaged in the
sale and distribution of parts for diesel engines and governors to the nuclear
industry. The Company services users of diesel engines that provide standby,
peak and base load power generation, as well as users of industrial reduction
gears such as the cement, paper and mining industries.

The Company has power generation and industrial operations providing
in-house and in-field repair capabilities and safety-related products to the
nuclear industry. These operations are located in Rocky Mount, North Carolina,
Medley and Bartow, Florida, Harvey, Louisiana, Seattle, Washington, and two
locations in Paducah, Kentucky. The operations based in Rocky Mount, North
Carolina, and Medley, Florida, are EMD authorized distributors for 17 eastern
states and the Caribbean for power generation and industrial applications, and
provide in-house and in-field service. The Rocky Mount operation is also the
exclusive worldwide distributor of EMD products to the nuclear industry, the
exclusive United States distributor for Woodward Governor ("Woodward") products
to the nuclear industry and the exclusive worldwide distributor of Cooper
products to the nuclear industry. The Paducah, Kentucky, operations are a
certified industrial renew center for Falk, and provide in-house and in-field
repair services for industrial reduction gears in the Midwest. The operations
based in Bartow, Florida, and Harvey, Louisiana, also provide in-house and
in-field industrial reduction gear repair services; however, they are not
certified industrial renew centers. The Seattle, Washington, operation provides
in-house and in-field repair services for Alco engines located on the West Coast
and the Pacific Rim.

POWER GENERATION AND INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS

The Company's major power generation customers are Miami-Dade County,
Florida Water and Sewer Authority, Progress Energy and the worldwide nuclear
power industry. The Company's major industrial customers include the cement,
paper and mining industries in the Midwest and southeast United States.

POWER GENERATION AND INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS

The Company's primary competitors are other independent diesel services
companies and industrial reduction gear repair companies and manufacturers.
While price is a major determinant in the competitive process, reputation,
consistent quality, expeditious service, experienced personnel, access to parts
inventories and market presence are significant factors. A substantial portion
of the Company's business is obtained by competitive bids. The Company has
entered into preferential service agreements with certain large operators of
diesel powered generation equipment, providing such operations with one source
of support and service for all of their requirements at pre-negotiated prices.

15
17

The Company is also the exclusive distributor of EMD and Cooper parts for
the nuclear industry worldwide and Woodward parts for the domestic nuclear
industry. Specific regulations relating to equipment used in nuclear power
generation require extensive testing and certification of replacement parts.
Non-genuine parts and parts not properly tested and certified cannot be used in
the nuclear applications.

ENGINE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

Engine Systems has an agreement with Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc.,
allowing Stewart & Stevenson to sell EMD engines within Engine Systems'
distributorship territory encompassing 17 eastern states and the Caribbean.
Engine Systems receives an annual fee based on sales within the distributorship
territory.

RAIL OPERATIONS

The Company is engaged in the overhaul and repair of locomotive diesel
engines and the sale of replacement parts for locomotives serving the shortline
and industrial railroads within the continental United States. The Company
serves as an exclusive distributor for EMD providing replacement parts, service
and support to these markets. EMD is the world's largest manufacturer of
diesel-electric locomotives, a position it has held for over 70 years.

RAIL CUSTOMERS

Shortline railroads have been a growing component of the United States
railroad industry since deregulation of the railroads in the 1970's. Generally,
shortline railroads have been created through the divestiture of branch routes
from other major railroad systems. Currently, about 500 shortline railroads in
the United States operate approximately 2,400 EMD engines. Approximately 280
United States industrial users operate approximately 1,300 EMD engines.
Generally, the EMD engines operated by the shortline and industrial users are
older and, therefore, may require more maintenance.

RAIL COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS

As an exclusive United States distributor for EMD parts, the Company
provides all EMD parts sales to these markets, as well as providing rebuild and
service work. There are several other companies providing service for shortline
and industrial locomotives. In addition, the industrial companies, in some
cases, provide their own service.

EMPLOYEES

Marine Systems, Engine Systems and Rail Systems together have approximately
250 employees.

PROPERTIES

The principal offices of the diesel engine services segment are located in
Houma, Louisiana. The Company also operates 10 parts and service facilities that
are located in Chesapeake, Virginia, Rocky Mount, North Carolina, Medley,
Florida, Bartow, Florida, two facilities in Houma, Louisiana, Harvey, Louisiana,
Seattle, Washington, and two in Paducah, Kentucky. All of these facilities are
located on leased property except the Houma, Louisiana, facilities that are
situated on approximately seven acres of Company owned land.

16
18

INSURANCE

Effective September 30, 1998, the Company sold its remaining 45% voting
common stock interest and its non-voting preferred stock interest in Universal
Insurance Company ("Universal") for $36,000,000 in cash. Universal, a property
and casualty insurance company in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, was formed by
the Company in 1972. In September 1992, the Company merged Universal with
Eastern America Insurance Company ("Eastern America"), a subsidiary of Eastern
America Insurance Group, Inc. ("Eastern America Group"). In accordance with a
shareholders' agreement among the Company, Universal and Eastern America Group,
through redemption rights, Universal had the obligation to purchase the
Company's entire interest in Universal gradually, over a 15-year period. The
sale was closed on October 7, 1998, and the cash proceeds were used to reduce
the outstanding balance under the Company's revolving credit agreement.

Under an anticipated redemption schedule, the Company would have received a
stream of cash payments between 1998 and the year 2008 totaling $62,000,000. The
$36,000,000 received represented the present value of the payment stream.
Including prior redemptions and the final sale, the Company received total
payments of $58,000,000 for its interest in Universal.

INSURANCE OPERATION

The Company has utilized and continues to utilize a Bermuda domiciled
wholly owned insurance subsidiary, Oceanic Insurance Limited ("Oceanic"), to
provide certain insurance and reinsurance for the Company and its marine
transportation and diesel engine services subsidiaries and affiliated entities.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The information appearing in Item 1 is incorporated herein by reference.
The Company and Kirby Inland Marine currently occupy leased office space at 55
Waugh Drive, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas, under a lease that expires in April
2006. The Company believes that its facilities at 55 Waugh Drive are adequate
for its needs and additional facilities would be available if required.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On January 9, 2001, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), in
conjunction with other federal and state law enforcement officials, executed a
warrant to seize records pertaining to the dry-cargo barge cleaning operations
of a subsidiary of the Company located in Highlands, Texas. The dry-cargo barges
cleaned last carried cargoes such as grain, coal, steel and other dry-bulk
commodities. Based on the information available at present to the Company, the
EPA is investigating possible violations of the Clean Water Act by the
subsidiary. The Company is cooperating with federal and state officials in the
investigation. As the investigation is in its preliminary stage, the Company is
unable to ascertain the extent of its exposure, if any, in this matter.

In August 2000, the Company and four affiliates were among a large group of
companies that received a request for information from the EPA pursuant to
Section 104 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act concerning a potential Superfund site, the Palmer Barge Line Site,
located in Port Arthur, Texas. In October 2000, the Company submitted its
response to the EPA's request. Based on the information currently available, the
Company is unable to ascertain the extent of its exposure, if any, in this
matter.

In addition, the Company is involved in various legal and other proceedings
which are incidental to the conduct of its business, none of which in the
opinion of management will have a material effect on the Company's financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows. Management has recorded
necessary reserves and believes that it has adequate insurance coverage or has
meritorious defenses for these other claims and contingencies.

17
19

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, no
matter was submitted to a vote of security holders through solicitation of
proxies or otherwise.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The executive officers of the Company are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AGE POSITIONS AND OFFICES
- ---- --- ---------------------
<S> <C> <C>
C. Berdon Lawrence......................... 58 Chairman of the Board of Directors
J. H. Pyne................................. 53 President, Director and Chief Executive
Officer
Norman W. Nolen............................ 58 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Assistant
Secretary
Mark R. Buese.............................. 45 Senior Vice President -- Administration
Jack M. Sims............................... 58 Vice President -- Human Resources
Connie C. Power............................ 42 Vice President -- Corporate Operations
Howard G. Runser........................... 50 Vice President -- Information Technology
G. Stephen Holcomb......................... 55 Vice President, Controller and Assistant
Secretary
Steven P. Valerius......................... 46 President -- Kirby Inland Marine, Inc.
Dorman L. Strahan.......................... 44 President -- Kirby Engine Systems, Inc.
</TABLE>

No family relationship exists among the executive officers or among the
executive officers and the directors. Officers are elected to hold office until
the annual meeting of directors, which immediately follows the annual meeting of
stockholders, or until their respective successors are elected and have
qualified.

C. Berdon Lawrence holds an M.B.A. degree and a B.B.A. degree in business
administration from Tulane University. He has served the Company as Chairman of
the Board since October 1999. Prior to joining the Company in October 1999, he
served for 30 years as President of Hollywood Marine, an inland tank barge
company of which he was the founder and principal shareholder and which was
acquired by the Company in October 1999.

J. H. Pyne holds a degree in liberal arts from the University of North
Carolina and has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
since April 1995. He has served the Company as a Director since 1988. He served
as Executive Vice President of the Company from 1992 to April 1995 and as
President of Kirby Inland Marine from 1984 to November 1999. He also served in
various operating and administrative capacities with Kirby Inland Marine from
1978 to 1984, including Executive Vice President from January to June 1984.
Prior to joining the Company, he was employed by Northrop Services, Inc. and
served as an officer in the United States Navy.

Norman W. Nolen is a Certified Public Accountant and holds an M.B.A. degree
from the University of Texas and a degree in electrical engineering from the
University of Houston. He has served the Company as Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since October 1999 and served as Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from February 1999 to
October 1999. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Senior Vice President,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Weatherford International, Inc. from
1991 to 1998. He served as Corporate Treasurer of Cameron Iron Works from 1980
to 1990 and as a corporate banker with Texas Commerce Bank from 1968 to 1980.

Mark R. Buese holds a degree in business administration from Loyola
University and has served the Company as Senior Vice President -- Administration
since October 1999. He served the Company or one of its subsidiaries as Vice
President -- Administration from 1993 to October 1999. He also served as Vice
President of Kirby Inland Marine from 1985 to 1999 and served in various sales,
operating and administrative capacities with Kirby Inland Marine from 1978
through 1985.

Jack M. Sims holds a degree in business administration from the University
of Miami and has served the Company, or one of its subsidiaries, as Vice
President -- Human Resources since 1993. Prior to joining the

18
20

Company in March 1993, he served as Vice President -- Human Resources for
Virginia Indonesia Company from 1982 through 1992, Manager -- Employee Relations
for Houston Oil and Minerals Corporation from 1977 through 1981 and in various
professional and managerial positions with Shell Oil Company from 1967 through
1977.

Connie C. Power holds a degree in marketing and transportation from the
University of South Alabama. She has served the Company as Vice
President -- Corporate Operations since January 2000. Prior to joining the
Company in October 1999, she served as Vice President -- Administration of
Hollywood Marine. Prior to joining Hollywood Marine in 1986, she was employed by
National Marine, Inc.

Howard G. Runser holds an M.B.A. degree from Xavier University and a
Bachelor of Science degree from Penn State University. He has served the Company
as Vice President -- Information Technology since January 2000. He is a
Certified Data Processor and a Certified Computer Programmer. Prior to joining
the Company in January 2000, he was Vice President of Financial Information
Systems for Petroleum Geo-Services, and previously held management positions
with Weatherford International, Inc. and Compaq Computer Corporation.

G. Stephen Holcomb holds a degree in business administration from Stephen
F. Austin State University and has served the Company as Vice President,
Controller and Assistant Secretary since January 1989. He also served as
Controller from 1987 through 1988 and as Assistant Controller from 1976 through
1986. Prior to that, he was Assistant Controller of Kirby Industries from 1973
to 1976. Prior to joining the Company, he was employed by Cooper Industries,
Inc.

Steven P. Valerius holds a J.D. degree from South Texas College of Law and
a degree in business administration from the University of Texas. He has served
the Company as President of Kirby Inland Marine since November 1999. Prior to
joining the Company in October 1999, he served as Executive Vice President of
Hollywood Marine. Prior to joining Hollywood Marine in 1979, he was employed by
KPMG LLP.

Dorman L. Strahan attended Nicholls State University and has served the
Company as President of Kirby Engine Systems, Inc. since May 1999, President of
Marine Systems since 1986, President of Rail Systems since 1993 and President of
Engine Systems since 1996. After joining the Company in 1982 in connection with
the acquisition of Marine Systems, he served as Vice President of Marine Systems
until 1985.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The Company's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol KEX. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per
share for the common stock for the periods indicated:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SALES PRICE
--------------------
HIGH LOW
------ ------
<S> <C> <C>
2001
First Quarter (through March 2, 2001)..................... $22.19 $19.26
2000
First Quarter............................................. 20.50 17.63
Second Quarter............................................ 24.63 19.63
Third Quarter............................................. 24.00 19.00
Fourth Quarter............................................ 21.00 17.25
1999
First Quarter............................................. 20.00 16.75
Second Quarter............................................ 21.50 17.81
Third Quarter............................................. 22.38 18.19
Fourth Quarter............................................ 20.69 16.50
</TABLE>

19
21

As of March 5, 2001, the Company had 24,026,370 outstanding shares held by
approximately 1,100 stockholders of record.

The Company does not have an established dividend policy. Decisions
regarding the payment of future dividends will be made by the Board of Directors
based on the facts and circumstances that exist at that time. Since 1989, the
Company has not paid any dividends on its common stock.

The common stock issued by the Company in the acquisition of Hollywood
Marine was not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act") in
reliance on an exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Act and
Regulation D promulgated thereunder. Hollywood Marine was a closely held company
and the Hollywood Marine merger was a privately negotiated transaction without
any general solicitation or advertising. The shareholders of Hollywood Marine
who received the Company's common stock represented to the Company that they
were all "accredited investors" (as defined in Regulation D) who were acquiring
the Company's stock for investment and acknowledged that there would be
restrictions on transfer of the shares received in the merger.

20
22

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The comparative selected financial data of the Company and consolidated
subsidiaries is presented for the five years ended December 31, 2000. The
offshore tanker and harbor service operations' financial results for 1997 have
been accounted for as discontinued operations and the 1996 financial statements
have been restated. The information should be read in conjunction with
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of the Company and the Financial Statements included under Item 8
elsewhere herein (in thousands, except per share amounts):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------
2000 1999(*) 1998(*) 1997 1996(*)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Marine transportation................. $443,203 $290,956 $244,839 $256,108 $249,594
Diesel engine services................ 69,441 74,648 82,241 79,136 70,422
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$512,644 $365,604 $327,080 $335,244 $320,016
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Net earnings from continuing
operations............................ $ 34,113 $ 21,441 $ 10,109 $ 22,705 $ 21,208
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Discontinued operations:
Earnings from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes................ -- -- -- 2,943 6,021
Estimated loss on sale of discontinued
operations, net of income taxes.... -- -- -- (3,966) --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
-- -- -- (1,023) 6,021
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net earnings.................. $ 34,113 $ 21,441 $ 10,109 $ 21,682 $ 27,229
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Earnings (loss) per share of common
stock:
Basic:
Continuing operations.............. $ 1.40 $ 1.01 $ .46 $ .93 $ .83
Discontinued operations............ -- -- -- (.04) .24
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$ 1.40 $ 1.01 $ .46 $ .89 $ 1.07
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Diluted:
Continuing operations.............. $ 1.39 $ 1.01 $ .46 $ .92 $ .82
Discontinued operations............ -- -- -- (.04) .24
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
$ 1.39 $ 1.01 $ .46 $ .88 $ 1.06
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic.............................. 24,401 21,172 21,847 24,381 25,555
Diluted............................ 24,566 21,293 22,113 24,594 25,781
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------
2000 1999(*) 1998(*) 1997 1996(*)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Property and equipment, net............. $453,807 $451,851 $256,899 $272,384 $277,622
Total assets............................ $749,268 $753,397 $390,299 $517,959 $524,530
Long-term debt.......................... $293,372 $321,607 $142,885 $154,818 $181,950
Stockholders' equity.................... $262,649 $240,036 $141,040 $218,269 $205,754
</TABLE>

- ---------------

(*) Comparability with prior periods is affected by the following: the purchase
of the assets of MKW in July 1996; the sale of the Company's remaining
interest in Universal effective September 30, 1998; and the purchase of the
stock of Hollywood Marine effective October 12, 1999.

21
23

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

Statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not historical facts,
including, but not limited to, any projections contained herein, are
forward-looking statements and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such
statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
"may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate" or "continue," or the negative
thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. The actual
results of the future events described in such forward-looking statements in
this Form 10-K could differ materially from those stated in such forward-looking
statements. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially are: adverse economic conditions, industry competition and other
competitive factors, adverse weather conditions such as high water, low water,
fog and ice, marine accidents, lock delays, construction of new equipment by
competitors, including construction with government assisted financing,
government and environmental laws and regulations, and the timing, magnitude and
number of acquisitions made by the Company.

On October 12, 2000, the Company's subsidiary, Marine Systems, completed
the acquisition of Powerway for $1,428,000 in cash. On November 1, 2000, Marine
Systems completed the acquisition of West Kentucky for an aggregate
consideration (before post-closing adjustments) of $6,674,000, consisting of
$6,629,000 in cash, the assumption of $20,000 of West Kentucky's existing debt
and $25,000 in merger costs.

On October 12, 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of Hollywood
Marine by means of a merger of Hollywood Marine into Kirby Inland Marine.
Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, the Company acquired Hollywood
Marine for an aggregate consideration of $320,788,000, consisting of $89,586,000
in common stock (4,384,000 shares at $20.44 per share), $128,658,000 in cash,
the assumption and refinancing of $99,185,000 of Hollywood Marine's existing
debt and $3,359,000 of merger costs. A final post-closing working capital
adjustment was completed on February 29, 2000, for an additional $1,802,000 in
common stock (88,000 shares at $20.44 per share). The final total purchase
consideration for Hollywood Marine was $322,590,000. C. Berdon Lawrence was the
principal shareholder of Hollywood Marine. Hollywood Marine's operations were
included as part of the Company's operations effective October 12, in accordance
with the purchase method of accounting. Goodwill is being amortized over 30
years.

In February 2001, the Company announced that it had entered into a
long-term lease with a subsidiary of Dow for 94 inland tank barges. The 94
inland tank barges are all double hull and have a total capacity of 1,335,000
barrels. The inland tank barges were acquired by Dow as part of the recent
merger between Union Carbide and Dow. The Company currently has a long-term
contract with Dow to provide for Dow's bulk liquid inland marine transportation
requirements throughout the U.S. inland waterway system. With the merger between
Union Carbide and Dow, the Company's long-term contract with Dow was amended to
provide for Union Carbide's bulk liquid inland marine transportation
requirements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Company reported net earnings of $34,113,000, or $1.39 per share, on
revenues of $512,644,000 for 2000, compared with net earnings of $21,441,000, or
$1.01 per share, on revenues of $365,604,000 for 1999 and net earnings of
$10,109,000, or $.46 per share, on revenues of $327,080,000 for 1998.

Marine transportation revenues for 2000 totaled $443,203,000, or 86% of
total revenues, compared with $290,956,000, or 80% of total revenues for 1999
and $244,839,000, or 75% of total revenues for 1998. Diesel engine services
revenues for 2000 totaled $69,441,000, or 14% of total revenues, compared with
$74,648,000, or 20% of total revenues for 1999 and $82,241,000, or 25% of total
revenues for 1998.

The Company reported net gains from the disposition of assets of $1,161,000
in 2000, $64,000 in 1999 and $3,517,000 in 1998. The net gains were
predominately from the sale of marine equipment. The $1,161,000 net gain in 2000
was primarily from the sale of four inland towboats and the scrapping of six
single-hull tank barges. The sale of the towboats was part of the Company's
ongoing efforts to optimize horsepower requirements. The $3,517,000 net gain in
1998 included a $3,900,000 gain from the sale of an offshore liquid tank barge
and tug unit, and a $400,000 loss from the scrapping of two ammonia barges and
other equipment.

22
24

The 2000 and 1999 results included merger related charges of $199,000 and
$4,502,000, or $130,000 and $2,912,000 after taxes, or $.01 and $.14 per share,
respectively, associated with the acquisition of Hollywood Marine. The charges
are more fully described below.

The 1999 results also included a $1,065,000, $692,000 after taxes, or $.03
per share, charge to equity in earnings of marine affiliates related to an
impairment write-down in the carrying value of an offshore dry-cargo barge in a
50% owned marine partnership. The impairment is more fully described below.

The 1998 results included a third quarter financial loss totaling
$10,536,000, $6,849,000 after taxes, or $.31 per share, from the sale of the
Company's remaining 45% voting common stock interest and its non-voting
preferred stock interest in Universal for $36,000,000 in cash. The Company's
investment in Universal was accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
The sale is more fully described below.

The 1998 results included an impairment write-down in the carrying value of
an offshore tank barge and tug unit totaling $8,333,000, $5,416,000 after taxes,
or $.24 per share. The impairment is more fully described below.

For purposes of this Management's Discussion, all earnings (loss) per share
are "Diluted earnings (loss) per share." The weighted average number of common
shares applicable to diluted earnings (loss) for 2000, 1999 and 1998 were
24,566,000, 21,293,000 and 22,113,000, respectively. The increase in the
weighted average number of common shares for 2000 compared with 1999 and 1998
primarily reflects the issuance of common stock for the Hollywood Marine
acquisition in October 1999, partially offset by open market stock repurchases
during 2000.

MARINE TRANSPORTATION

The Company, through its marine transportation segment, is a provider of
marine transportation services, operating a fleet of 871 inland tank barges and
215 inland towing vessels, transporting industrial chemicals and petrochemicals,
refined petroleum products, black oil products and agricultural chemicals along
the United States inland waterways. The marine transportation segment also
operates one offshore dry-bulk barge and tugboat unit. The segment serves as
managing partner of a 35% owned offshore marine partnership, consisting of four
dry-bulk barge and tug units. The partnership is accounted for under the equity
method of accounting.

Marine Transportation Revenues

The marine transportation segment reported 2000 revenues of $443,203,000, a
52% increase compared with $290,956,000 reported for the 1999 year and an
increase of 81% compared with $244,839,000 reported for the 1998 year. The 2000
year included a full year of revenues from Hollywood Marine and the 1999 year
included revenues from Hollywood Marine beginning October 12, the date of
acquisition. Revenues on a pro forma basis, combining the Company and Hollywood
Marine for 1999 and 1998, were $422,412,000 and $412,174,000, respectively.

2000 Marine Transportation Revenues

Revenues for 2000, as noted above, totaled $443,203,000, or 52% over 1999
revenues, primarily reflecting a full year of revenues from Hollywood Marine,
acquired in October 1999. The segment operates under long-term contracts,
short-term contracts and spot transactions for the movement of bulk liquid
products. During the 2000 year, approximately 70% of movements were under term
contracts and 30% were spot market movements.

During the first half of 2000, chemical and petrochemical movements were
strong, reflecting the strong economy. During the second half of the year, and
specifically the fourth quarter, demand for the movements of chemicals and
petrochemicals softened, the result of a slowing economy and inventory
adjustments. Refined product movements to the Midwest were strong in the 2000
first half, were unseasonably soft in the third quarter and returned to expected
levels in the fourth quarter. During the 2000 third quarter, refined product
movements declined earlier than the typical slowdown after the Labor Day
holiday. Fertilizer movements were unseasonably strong in the 2000 first
quarter, the result of low inventory levels in Midwest terminals, and at
23
25

expected levels for the balance of the year. Black oil and pressure product
movements were at expected levels for the 2000 year.

During the 2000 year, contract renewals were generally at modestly higher
rates. Spot market rates trended upward to record high levels during the 2000
first half, the result of strong transportation markets. In the 2000 second
half, spot market rates declined approximately 10% from their record high levels
due to the decline in refined product movements and the softness in chemical and
petrochemical movements. At the end of 2000, spot market rates were
approximately 5% higher than levels at the end of 1999.

The 2000 first quarter and fourth quarter were negatively impacted by
seasonal weather. Low water conditions on the Mississippi River System in the
2000 first, third and fourth quarters resulted in longer transit times, as well
as restricted drafts requiring the light loading of product for upriver
movements, negatively impacting revenues. Weather and water conditions for the
2000 second quarter were favorable.

1999 Marine Transportation Revenues

Revenues for 1999 increased 19% over 1998 revenues, including revenues from
Hollywood Marine since the date of acquisition. During 1999, revenues reflected
a modest continual upward trend in spot market rates and contract renewals were
generally at modestly higher rates. During the first nine months of 1999,
approximately 75% of movements were under term contracts and 25% were spot
transactions. After the acquisition of Hollywood Marine, approximately 70% of
movements were under term contracts and 30% were spot movements. Hollywood
Marine movements were approximately 60% contract and 40% spot market.

During the 1999 year, chemical and petrochemical movements remained strong.
Refined product movements, more seasonal in nature, were strong during the
summer months and steady during the non-summer months. Liquid fertilizer and
ammonia movements fell below normal expectations during the first nine months;
however, movements rebounded during the fourth quarter to more normal levels.
Overproduction of nitrogen in 1998 and early 1999, coupled with a 30-year low
corn price level, deterred farmers from planting corn and resulted in high
inventory levels of liquid fertilizer in the Midwest. Producers curtailed
production for most of 1999, resulting in decreased shipments of liquid
fertilizer into the Midwest. Black oil shipments, a product line acquired with
the October 1999 Hollywood Marine acquisition and more seasonal in nature, were
negatively impacted by warm weather in October and November.

During the 1999 first quarter, poor operating conditions resulted in
significant navigational delays (weather, locks and other restrictions), which
lowered revenues due to increased transit times. During the 1999 fourth quarter,
lack of adequate rainfall in the Ohio River Valley and the Midwest resulted in
low water levels in the Mississippi River north of Baton Rouge. Such low water
levels resulted in the light loading of product, thereby reducing revenues.

1998 Marine Transportation Revenues

Revenues for the 1998 year totaled $244,839,000, a decrease of 4% compared
with $256,108,000 reported for the 1997 year. During 1998, revenues benefited
from a continued upward trend in spot market rates and contract renewals were
generally at higher rates. During 1998, approximately 80% of movements were
under term contracts and 20% were spot market transactions. Chemical and
petrochemical volumes increased gradually from 1997 levels, while refined
product movements and liquid fertilizer movements declined slightly. Both
refined product and liquid fertilizer movements were negatively impacted by
increased volumes produced in Midwest facilities, reducing ton miles moved
during 1998 versus 1997.

During the 1998 year, the Company experienced numerous navigational delays,
primarily weather related. During September 1998, the Company was negatively
impacted by two hurricanes and one tropical storm along the Gulf of Mexico,
significantly reducing fleet efficiency. Loss of revenues due to the storm
events was estimated at $600,000 and additional operating expenses incurred were
estimated at $400,000. The effects of the three storm events reduced the
segment's net earnings by an estimated $.02 to $.03 per share. During the 1998
fourth quarter, navigational delays also negatively impacted revenues and
increased operating expenses. Delays were experienced in numerous areas of
operations at various times during the quarter, the

24
26

results of heavy rains in Southeast and Central Texas, flooding on the Arkansas
River, and low water on the Ohio River. The delays increased transit time,
thereby reducing operating efficiencies.

In October 1998, the Company sold two offshore tank barge and tug units,
exiting the market for the coastwise transportation of liquid petroleum
products. One of the units was fully employed through September 1998 and the
other unit was employed only through July 1998. The 1998 year reflected revenues
of $4,509,000 from the units before their sale.

Marine Transportation Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses, excluding interest expense and merger related charges,
for the segment for the 2000 year totaled $365,103,000, up 50% compared with
costs and expenses, excluding interest expense and merger related charges, of
$243,431,000 for the 1999 year. The 2000 costs and expenses were up 76% compared
with the 1998 costs and expenses, excluding interest expense and the impairment
of a long-lived asset, of $207,178,000. The 2000 and the 1999 costs and expenses
include the expenses of Hollywood Marine since the date of acquisition. Each
year reflected higher equipment costs, health and welfare costs, and
inflationary increases in costs and expenses. Specific events, which affected
the costs and expenses for each of the last three years, are more fully
described below.

2000 Marine Transportation Costs and Expenses

During 2000, and particularly the third quarter, the segment experienced
increased fuel costs to operate its inland towboats. The average price per
gallon consumed in the 2000 first through fourth quarters was 79 cents, 78
cents, 93 cents and 96 cents, respectively, significantly higher than the
average price per gallon consumed of approximately 48 cents during the 1999
year. The segment's term contracts contain fuel escalation clauses allowing
increases and decreases in fuel to be passed through or credited to the
customers. Generally, there is a 30 to 90 day delay before contracts are
adjusted for fuel costs. The significant hike in fuel costs in the 2000 third
quarter reduced the Company's net earnings for that quarter by an estimated $.02
per share. However, the majority of the increased fuel costs were recovered in
the 2000 fourth quarter.

The 2000 year also included additional administrative expenses associated
with the integration of the Company's and Hollywood Marine's accounting,
information and dispatching systems. The segment also incurred additional
training expenses during the 2000 year, associated with the hiring and training
of entry level vessel personnel in order to maintain adequate crewing for the
vessels in a very tight afloat labor market.

1999 Marine Transportation Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses for the 1999 year included the full year's impact of an
overall 20% afloat wage increase implemented during 1998, the result of a tight
afloat labor market. During 1998, the segment increased afloat compensation by
6% effective March 1 and by 11% effective August 1, as well as increased
longevity pay, trip pay, travel pay and mileage reimbursement. The overall 20%
afloat wage increase was necessary not only to retain current employees, but
also to increase compensation to levels that were competitive with other
industries so as to attract new afloat personnel. Afloat wages for the 1999 year
increased approximately $6,900,000 compared with 1998 as a result of the overall
20% wage increase and the Hollywood Marine acquisition. During 1999, the segment
benefited from lower maintenance costs compared with 1998. Shipyard rates were
lower due to less demand from the offshore oil service industry, a traditional
heavy user of shipyard space. The marine transportation segment also benefited
from continued costs savings from its ongoing cost reduction procurement
program. The 1998 year also included $3,600,000 of costs and expenses associated
with revenues generated by the two offshore tank barge and tug units which were
sold in October 1998.

1998 Marine Transportation Costs and Expenses

As stated above, afloat wages during 1998 were increased by an overall 20%,
which increased labor costs approximately $4,500,000 when compared with the 1997
year. In addition, during 1998, due to afloat labor

25
27

shortages, the segment incurred approximately $900,000 of additional costs
associated with hiring outside labor, principally tankermen.

During 1998, costs and expenses reflected higher maintenance costs as
compared with the 1997 year. The higher maintenance costs were due to competing
for shipyard space with companies participating in the strong offshore oil
service industry in the Gulf of Mexico. During the 1998 second half, such
competition diminished due to the decline in oil service activities.

The 1998 year also included an impairment of a long-lived asset of
$8,333,000. The carrying value of an offshore tank barge and tugboat unit was
written down in the 1998 third quarter in accordance with SFAS 121. The unit was
sold on October 30, 1998, for a price approximating the revised carrying value
of the unit.

Marine Transportation Operating Income

Operating income for the segment for the 2000 year totaled $78,100,000, a
64% increase compared with 1999 operating income of $47,525,000 and 107% higher
than the 1998 year's operating income of $37,661,000, before the $8,333,000
impairment charge noted above. The operating margin for the segment was 17.6%
for 2000, 16.3% for 1999 and 15.4% for 1998.

Marine Transportation Equity in Earnings of Marine Affiliates

Equity in earnings of marine affiliates consisted primarily of a 35% owned
offshore marine partnership in 2000 and the 35% owned and a 50% owned offshore
marine partnership for 1999 and 1998. Equity in earnings totaled $3,394,000 for
the 2000 year, up 59% from equity in earnings of $2,136,000 for 1999 and up 259%
from equity in earnings of $946,000 for 1998.

During 2000, 1999 and 1998, the four offshore dry-cargo barge and tugboat
units owned through the 35% owned partnership were generally fully employed
under the partnership's coal and rock contracts. During the 1999 and 1998 fourth
quarters, the carrying value of an offshore dry-cargo barge and tugboat unit
owned through the 50% owned partnership was reduced by $2,130,000 ($1,065,000 to
the Company) and $5,900,000 ($2,950,000 to the Company), respectively. The
impairments, in accordance with SFAS No. 121, were recorded as reductions in
equity in earnings of marine affiliates. The impairment in 1998 was recognized
when the future undiscounted cash flows of the unit were estimated to be
insufficient to recover the unit's carrying value. The 1999 impairment was
recognized when the Company executed a contract to sell the tugboat at a price
less than its current carrying value, and the barge was written down to a fair
value based on the current market value of similar equipment. The barge was sold
in June 2000 at a price approximating the then current carrying value.

DIESEL ENGINE SERVICES

The Company, through its diesel engine services segment, sells genuine
replacement parts, provides service mechanics to overhaul and repair large
medium-speed diesel engines and reduction gears, and maintains facilities to
rebuild component parts or entire large medium-speed diesel engines or entire
reduction gears. The segment services the marine, power generation and
industrial, and shortline and industrial railroad markets.

Diesel Engine Services Revenues

The segment reported 2000 revenues of $69,441,000, a decrease of 7%
compared with $74,648,000 reported for the 1999 year and a decrease of 16%
compared with $82,241,000 reported for the 1998 year.

2000 Diesel Engine Services Revenues

Revenues for 2000, as noted above, totaled $69,441,000, or 7% under 1999
revenues. During 2000, the segment experienced softness in its East Coast engine
rebuild market, as well as its Midwest marine and industrial rail application
markets. On a positive note, the segment benefited from stronger service work
and

26
28

parts sales to the Gulf of Mexico oil and gas services market, a market which
had been depressed since mid 1998.

1999 Diesel Engine Services Revenues

The 9% decrease in revenues for 1999 compared with 1998 was principally due
to the continued depressed Gulf Coast oil and gas services markets and the sale
of the power control business line in September 1998, which generated
approximately $5,100,000 of 1998 revenues through the date of sale. In the 1999
first six months, strong Midwest and East Coast engine overhauls and parts sales
partially offset the weak Gulf Coast market, as Gulf Coast mechanics were
dispatched to the strong markets to meet the increased demands of those markets.
During the 1999 second half, the Midwest and East Coast demands returned to
normal, resulting in the reduction in overall revenues for 1999 compared with
1998. In addition, the segment's shortline and industrial railroad markets
continued to experience slower activity levels during the 1999 year when
compared with 1998.

1998 Diesel Engine Services Revenues

Revenues for the 1998 year totaled $82,241,000, a 4% increase compared with
$79,136,000 for the 1997 year. The 4% increase was primarily due to a strong
demand nationwide for direct parts sales. For the 1998 first half, the Gulf
Coast market remained strong due to the strong oil and gas services activity in
the Gulf of Mexico. During the 1998 second half, the Gulf Coast market did
experience a modest decline in activities as the Gulf of Mexico oil and gas
services market subsided. The East Coast, Midwest and West Coast markets
remained positive, supported by the strong overall economy. In September 1998,
the segment exited the power control business line. The segment reported
revenues from that line of $5,100,000 during 1998 compared with $6,600,000 for
1997.

Diesel Engine Services Costs and Expenses

Costs and expenses, excluding interest expense, for the segment for 2000
totaled $62,486,000, a decrease of 7% compared with $67,519,000 for 1999 and a
decrease of 16% compared with $74,191,000 for 1998. The 2000 decrease compared
with 1999 and 1998 reflected the decline in business from the segment's East
Coast engine rebuild market and rail market. The 1999 decrease compared with
1998 reflected the decline in business from the segment's Gulf Coast market and
the sale of the power control portion of the business in 1998.

Diesel Engine Services Operating Income

Operating income for the segment for 2000 was $6,955,000, a decrease of 2%
compared with $7,129,000 for 1999 and 14% lower than the 1998 operating income
of $8,050,000. Operating margin for the segment was 10.0% for 2000, 9.6% for
1999 and 9.8% for 1998.

MERGER RELATED CHARGES

In connection with the acquisition of Hollywood Marine, the Company
recorded $4,502,000 of pre-tax merger related charges ($2,912,000 after taxes,
or $.14 per share) in the fourth quarter of 1999 to combine the acquired
operations with those of the Company. Such charges were as follows (in
thousands):

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Severance for Company employees............................. $2,061
Exit of insurance mutual.................................... 870
Corporate headquarters lease abandonment.................... 1,571
------
$4,502
======
</TABLE>

The cash portion of the merger related charge totaled $3,248,000. The
non-cash portion of the charges consisted of $748,000 for the write-off of the
Company's leasehold improvements of its former corporate headquarters and
$506,000 for severance pay for changes in stock option terms.

27
29

In 2000, the Company recorded additional merger related charges of
$199,000, consisting of a $482,000 ($313,000 after taxes, or $.01 per share)
charge in June associated with the termination of the corporate headquarter's
lease and a $283,000 ($184,000 after taxes, or $.01 per share) credit in
December to reduce the current estimates of remaining expenditures.

The Company expects that the accrued severance remaining will be paid in
June 2001. The remaining corporate headquarters reserve for lease abandonment
was paid in January 2001.

PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE

Effective September 30, 1998, the Company sold its remaining 45% voting
common stock interest and its non-voting preferred stock interest in Universal
for $36,000,000 in cash. Universal, a property and casualty insurance company in
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, was formed by the Company in 1972. In September
1992, the Company merged Universal with Eastern America, a subsidiary of Eastern
America Group. In accordance with a shareholders agreement among the Company,
Universal and Eastern America Group, through redemption rights, Universal had
the obligation to purchase the Company's entire interest in Universal gradually,
over a 15-year period. The sale was closed on October 7, 1998, with the cash
proceeds used to reduce the Company's revolving line of credit.

Under an anticipated redemption schedule, the Company would have received a
stream of cash payments between 1998 and the year 2008 totaling $62,000,000. The
$36,000,000 received represented the present value of the payment stream.
Including prior redemptions and the final sale, the Company received total
payments of $58,000,000 for its interest in Universal.

The Company recognized, during the 1998 third quarter, a pre-tax loss for
financial purposes of $10,536,000 on the Universal transaction. The investment
in Universal, accounted for under the equity method of accounting, was based on
the estimated receipt of $62,000,000 of redemption payments over the next 11
years and the recording of the remaining built-in gain on the sale.

The amount recorded as equity in earnings for the Company's investment in
Universal was influenced by anticipated future redemptions by Universal of its
common stock. The Company also had a 100% ownership in Universal's non-voting
preferred stock. Because the preferred stock was collateralized by a separate
portfolio of U.S. Treasury Securities, the Company accounted for this preferred
stock under SFAS No. 115. Therefore, the interest earned, as well as the
realized gains from the sale of U.S. Treasury Securities collateralizing the
preferred stock, were included as part of equity in earnings of the insurance
affiliate. During 1998, the Company recorded $790,000 of interest earned from
its investment in U.S. Treasury Securities.

For 1998, in addition to the loss on the sale of the remaining interest in
Universal as noted above, the Company recorded equity in earnings from Universal
of $1,325,000 for the first nine months of 1998.

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense for 2000 totaled $23,917,000, compared with $12,838,000 in
1999 and $11,898,000 in 1998. The 86% increase for 2000 over 1999 primarily
reflected interest expense on the borrowings to finance the Hollywood Marine
acquisition since October 12, 1999, the date of the acquisition, and treasury
stock repurchases. The average debt and average interest rate for 2000 were
$320,955,000 and 7.5%, compared with $172,394,000 and 7.5% for 1999 and
$161,130,000 and 7.4% for 1998, respectively.

FINANCIAL CONDITION, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Balance Sheet

Total assets as of December 31, 2000 were $749,268,000, a decrease of 1%
compared with $753,397,000 as of December 31, 1999, however, 92% higher than the
December 31, 1998 total assets of $390,299,000. The December 31, 2000 and
December 31, 1999 total assets reflected the acquisition of Hollywood Marine in
October 1999.

28
30

In December 2000, Oceanic, the Company's wholly owned captive insurance
subsidiary, liquidated its remaining available-for-sale securities. The proceeds
were used to reduce the outstanding balance under the Company's revolving line
of credit. Available-for-sale balances as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 were
$13,091,000 and $20,795,000, respectively. The liquidation of the
available-for-sale securities and the reduction of the available-for-sale
balances in 1999 compared with 1998, reflected the Company's use of Oceanic
during 2000 and 1999 to provide certain insurance and for the procurement of
reinsurance in international markets to limit its exposure to losses. Prior to
1999, Oceanic was used to insure risks of the Company and its subsidiaries,
which required Oceanic to be more fully capitalized.

Total current assets as of December 31, 2000 were $118,466,000, a decrease
of 4% compared with $122,823,000 as of December 31, 1999, and a 5% increase
compared with $112,358,000 as of December 31, 1998. The 4% decrease from 1999 to
2000 reflected the liquidation of the available-for-sale securities noted above,
partially offset by a 12% increase in trade accounts receivable. Inventory also
increased by 19% in 2000 over 1999, primarily the result of the two diesel
engine services acquisitions in the 2000 fourth quarter.

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, totaled
$453,807,000 as of December 31, 2000, was relatively constant with the
$451,851,000 as of December 31, 1999, and was 77% higher than the December 31,
1998 balance of $256,899,000. The 2000 and 1999 balances reflected the property
and equipment acquired in the Hollywood Marine transaction, and the 2000
balances reflected two diesel engine services acquisitions in the 2000 fourth
quarter. In 2000, the Company made a final purchase price adjustment to the
Hollywood Marine acquisition totaling approximately $4,600,000 to reflect the
fair value of the property and equipment acquired in the transaction.

Goodwill as of December 31, 2000 totaled $162,604,000 compared with
$161,095,000 as of December 31, 1999 and $5,368,000 as of December 31, 1998.
Goodwill totaling $157,352,000 was recorded for the Hollywood Marine acquisition
in 1999, representing the excess of the purchase price over the amount allocated
to identifiable assets and liabilities. In 2000, the Company made a final
purchase price adjustment increasing goodwill by approximately $3,900,000. In
2000, the Company also recorded goodwill totaling approximately $3,300,000 from
two diesel engine services acquisitions. Goodwill from the Hollywood Marine
acquisition is being amortized over 30 years, and the diesel engine services
goodwill is being amortized over 10 to 15 years.

Total current liabilities as of December 31, 2000 were $97,037,000 compared
with $91,565,000 as of December 31, 1999 and $65,940,000 as of December 31,
1998. The 6% increase from 1999 to 2000 reflected higher income taxes payable,
and accounts payable related to shipyard maintenance expenditures. The 47%
increase for 2000 compared with 1998 primarily reflected the acquisition of
Hollywood Marine in 1999.

Total long-term liabilities as of December 31, 2000 were $389,582,000, an
8% reduction compared with $421,796,000 as of December 31, 1999 and 113% higher
than the December 31, 1998 total long-term liabilities of $183,319,000. The 2000
and 1999 balances reflected the acquisition of Hollywood Marine in 1999.

Long-term debt, less current portion, as of December 31, 2000 totaled
$288,037,000 compared with $316,272,000 at December 31, 1999 and $137,552,000 as
of December 31, 1998. The 9% reduction from 1999 to 2000 primarily resulted from
the pay down of long-term debt from the free cash flow generated by the Company,
less capital expenditures and treasury stock repurchases. The significant
increase in 1999 compared with 1998 primarily reflected the borrowing in 1999 of
approximately $220,000,000 to finance the Hollywood Marine acquisition.

Stockholders' equity as of December 31, 2000 totaled $262,649,000 compared
with $240,036,000 as of December 31, 1999 and $141,040,000 as of December 31,
1998. The December 31, 2000 balance reflected open market purchases of common
stock during the 2000 year totaling $15,791,000, more fully described in
Treasury Stock Purchases below. The 1999 balance reflected the Company's
issuance of $89,586,000 of the Company's common stock (4,384,000 shares at
$20.44 per share) associated with the acquisition of Hollywood Marine and the
open market purchases of common stock totaling $12,362,000. The 1998 balance
reflected the Company's purchase of common stock under a Dutch Auction
self-tender offer and open market purchases of common stock.

29
31

Long-Term Financing

The Company has a $100,000,000 revolving credit agreement (the "Credit
Agreement") with The Chase Manhattan Bank, as agent bank, with a maturity date
of September 19, 2002. The Credit Agreement contains certain covenants, the most
restrictive of which requires the Company to maintain consolidated minimum net
worth, as defined, of at least $129,673,000. Proceeds under the Credit Agreement
may be used for general corporate purposes, the purchase of existing or new
equipment, the purchase of the Company's common stock or for possible business
acquisitions. As of December 31, 2000, $32,100,000 was outstanding under the
Credit Agreement. The Company was in compliance with all of the Credit Agreement
covenants at December 31, 2000.

On October 12, 1999, the Company entered into a $200,000,000 senior credit
facility (the "Credit Facility") with a syndicate of banks, with Bank of
America, N.A. ("Bank of America"), as agent bank, to finance the acquisition of
Hollywood Marine. The Credit Facility converted to a four-year term loan on
October 9, 2000, with quarterly principal payments of $12,500,000, plus
interest, due beginning October 9, 2002. The remaining principal and interest is
due on October 9, 2004, the maturity date of the Credit Facility. The Credit
Facility contains certain covenants, the most restrictive of which requires the
Company to maintain consolidated minimum net worth, as defined, of at least
$207,475,000. The Company was in compliance with all of the Credit Facility
covenants at December 31, 2000. As of December 31, 2000, the amount borrowed
under the Credit Facility totaled $200,000,000.

On November 7, 2000, the Company entered into a $10,000,000 uncommitted
line of credit with Bank of America whereby the Company may request, and Bank of
America will consider, short-term advances and the issuance of letters of credit
through the maturity date of November 6, 2001. As of December 31, 2000, the
uncommitted line of credit had not been activated.

In December 1994, the Company established a $250,000,000 medium term note
program providing for the issuance of fixed rate or floating rate notes with
maturities of nine months or longer. The shelf registration program, registered
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, was activated in March 1995 with
the issuance of $34,000,000 of the authorized notes which matured on March 10,
1997. In June 1995, the Company issued $45,000,000 of authorized notes which
matured on June 1, 2000. In January 1997, the Company issued $50,000,000 of the
authorized medium term notes at a fixed interest rate of 7.05%, due January 29,
2002. Proceeds from the sale of notes were used to retire the $34,000,000 of
medium term notes due March 10, 1997, with the balance used to reduce the
Company's revolving Credit Agreement. The $45,000,000 of authorized notes due
June 1, 2000 were paid though a draw-down under the Company's revolving Credit
Agreement. As of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, $121,000,000 was available
under the medium term note program to provide financing for future business and
equipment acquisitions, and to fund working capital requirements.

Capital Expenditures

During 2000, the marine transportation segment purchased three existing
inland tank barges. In 1999, no new or existing equipment was purchased outside
of the Hollywood Marine acquisition. In 1998, the segment purchased 17 existing
inland tank barges and four inland towboats. Capital expenditures in 2000, 1999
and 1998, primarily for upgrading the existing marine transportation fleet, were
$47,683,000, $12,719,000 and $27,445,000, respectively.

In September 2000, the marine transportation segment entered into a
contract for the construction of six double hull, 30,000 barrel capacity inland
tank barges for use in the movement of chemicals, petrochemicals and refined
petroleum products. Delivery of the first barge is scheduled for late March
2001, and the remaining five barges are scheduled to be delivered one every 60
days thereafter. The total purchase price of the six barges is approximately
$8,500,000. Financing of the construction of the six barges will be through
operating cash flows and available credit under the Company's Credit Agreement.

In January 2001, the marine transportation segment entered into a contract
for the construction of five double hull, 30,000 barrel capacity inland tank
barges for use in the asphalt trade. Delivery of the first barge is

30
32

expected in August 2001, and the remaining four asphalt barges are scheduled to
be delivered one every 30 days thereafter. The total purchase price of the five
barges is approximately $9,000,000. Financing of the construction of the five
barges will be through operating cash flows and available credit under the
Company's Credit Agreement.

Treasury Stock Purchases

During 2000, the Company purchased 860,000 shares of its common stock in
the open market at a total price of $15,791,000, for an average price of $18.37
per share. During 1999, the Company purchased 713,000 shares of its common stock
in the open market at a total purchase price of $12,362,000, for an average
price of $17.33 per share. During 1998, the Company purchased 739,000 shares of
its common stock in the open market at a total purchase price of $15,541,000,
for an average price of $21.04 per share.

On March 23, 1998, the Company purchased 3,066,922 shares of its common
stock under a Dutch Auction self-tender offer at a price of $24.50 per share.
The Company announced the self-tender offer on February 17, 1998, with an
expiration date of March 16, 1998, expressing its intentions to purchase up to
3,000,000 shares at a purchase price ranging from $21.00 to $24.50 per share.
The Company elected to increase the size of the 3,000,000 share tender offer and
to accept all shares tendered at a price of $24.50 per share. The 3,066,922
shares purchased represented approximately 12.6% of the Company's common stock
outstanding immediately prior to the offer.

On April 20, 1999, the Board of Directors increased the Company's common
stock repurchase authorization by an additional 2,000,000 shares. As of March 5,
2001, the Company had 1,502,000 shares available under the repurchase
authorization. The treasury stock purchases were financed by borrowing under the
Company's Credit Agreement. The Company is authorized to purchase its common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange and in privately negotiated transactions.
When purchasing its common stock, the Company is subject to price, trading
volume and other market considerations. Shares purchased may be used for
reissuance upon the exercise of stock options, in future acquisitions for stock
or for other appropriate corporate purposes.

Liquidity

The Company generated net cash provided by operating activities of
$83,303,000, $72,369,000 and $35,446,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998, respectively. The increase for the 2000 year reflected a full
year of the operations of Hollywood Marine, partially offset by a $1,948,000
negative impact in working capital. The 1999 year was positively impacted by a
$14,119,000 increase in cash flow, resulting from positive changes in working
capital, compared with a negative change in working capital of $15,623,000 for
1998.

The Company accounts for its ownership in its 35% and 50% owned marine
partnerships under the equity method of accounting, recognizing cash flow only
upon the receipt or disbursements of cash from the partnerships. For the 2000,
1999 and 1998 years, the Company received $5,460,000, $3,121,000 and $4,407,000,
respectively, of cash from the marine partnerships. As detailed under Marine
Transportation Equity in Earnings of Marine Affiliates above, the barge owned
through the 50% owned partnership was sold in 1999 and the tugboat was sold in
2000.

Funds generated are available for acquisitions, capital construction
projects, treasury stock repurchases, repayment of borrowings associated with
each of the above and for other operating requirements. In addition to net cash
flow provided by operating activities, the Company also had available as of
March 5, 2001, $78,800,000 under its Credit Agreement and $121,000,000 under its
medium term note program. As of March 2, 2001, the Company had $9,000,000
available under its line of credit with Bank of America. The Company's scheduled
principal payments during the next 12 months are $5,335,000.

During the last three years, inflation has had a relatively minor effect on
the financial results of the Company. The marine transportation segment has
long-term contracts which generally contain cost escalation clauses whereby
certain costs, including fuel, can be passed through to its customers; however,
there is

31
33

typically a 30 to 90 day delay before contracts are adjusted for fuel prices.
During the third quarter of 2000, fuel costs increased substantially, and the
Company was unable to recover its additional fuel cost from its customers until
the 2000 fourth quarter. The repair portion of the diesel engine services
segment is based on prevailing current market rates.

Accounting Standards

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS No. 133"), issued in June
1998, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments
and hedging activities. This statement requires that an entity recognize all
derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial
position and measure those instruments at fair value. The Company will adopt
SFAS No. 133, as amended, in the first quarter of 2001 and does not expect it to
have a material effect on the Company's financial position or results of
operations.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in the interest rates on
certain of its outstanding debt and changes in fuel prices. The outstanding loan
balance under the Company's revolving credit agreements bears interest at
variable rates based on prevailing short-term interest rates in the United
States and Europe. Notes issued under the Company's medium term note program may
bear fixed or variable interest rates, although the notes issued to date have
all been fixed rate notes. A 10% change in variable interest rates would impact
the 2001 interest expense by approximately $1,764,000, based on balances
outstanding at December 31, 2000, and change the fair value of the Company's
debt by less than 1%. The potential impact on the Company of fuel price
increases is limited because most of its term contracts contain escalation
clauses under which increases in fuel costs, among others, can be passed on to
the customers, while its spot contract rates are set based on prevailing fuel
prices. The Company does not presently use commodity derivative instruments to
manage its fuel costs. At December 31, 2000, the Company had $232,100,000 of
floating rate debt outstanding and did not hold any derivative financial
instruments. In February 2001, the Company entered into interest rate swap
contracts with two banks to hedge the Company's exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates. Under the terms of the interest rate swap contracts, the Company
will pay to the banks interest at an average fixed rate of 5.64% based on a
notional $100,000,000 of debt and, in turn, will be paid the floating rate of
LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) by the banks for a five-year period. The
Company does not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions for
speculative purposes. As of December 31, 1999, the Company held one interest
rate swap that was acquired in the merger with Hollywood Marine. The interest
rate swap terminated on March 27, 2000, and had no material impact on the
Company's financial position. The Company has no foreign exchange risks.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The response to this item is submitted as a separate section of this report
(see Item 14, page 60).

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEMS 10 THROUGH 13.

The information for these items is incorporated by reference to the
definitive proxy statement filed by the Company with the Commission pursuant to
the Regulation 14A within 120 days of the close of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2000, except for the information regarding executive officers which
is provided in a separate item, captioned "Executive Officers of the
Registrant," and is included as an unnumbered item following Item 4 in Part I of
this Form 10-K.

32
34

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors of Kirby Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kirby
Corporation and consolidated subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and
the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion of these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Kirby
Corporation and consolidated subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2000 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
January 31, 2001

33
35

KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND 1999

ASSETS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999
-------- --------
($ IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................. $ 4,658 $ 3,571
Available-for-sale securities............................. -- 13,091
Accounts receivable:
Trade -- less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$816,000 ($660,000 in 1999)........................... 80,493 71,755
Insurance claims and other............................. 6,910 6,637
Inventory -- finished goods, at lower of average cost or
market................................................. 15,650 13,127
Prepaid expenses.......................................... 7,034 9,684
Deferred income taxes..................................... 3,721 4,958
-------- --------
Total current assets.............................. 118,466 122,823
-------- --------
Property and equipment:
Marine transportation equipment........................... 666,254 639,327
Land, buildings and equipment............................. 57,922 49,228
-------- --------
724,176 688,555
Accumulated depreciation.................................. 270,369 236,704
-------- --------
453,807 451,851
-------- --------
Investment in marine affiliates............................. 12,784 14,941
Goodwill -- less accumulated amortization of $9,455,000
($3,753,000 in 1999)...................................... 162,604 161,095
Other assets................................................ 1,607 2,687
-------- --------
$749,268 $753,397
======== ========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

34
36

KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND 1999

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999
-------- --------
($ IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C>
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt......................... $ 5,335 $ 5,335
Income taxes payable...................................... 3,393 517
Accounts payable.......................................... 35,877 29,909
Accrued liabilities:
Interest............................................... 1,238 2,309
Insurance premiums and claims.......................... 22,507 23,811
Bonus, pension and profit-sharing plans................ 13,848 11,784
Taxes -- other than on income.......................... 5,610 3,667
Other.................................................. 5,916 10,160
Deferred revenues......................................... 3,313 4,073
-------- --------
Total current liabilities......................... 97,037 91,565
-------- --------
Long-term debt -- less current portion...................... 288,037 316,272
Deferred income taxes....................................... 89,138 92,794
Minority interests.......................................... 3,308 3,338
Other long-term liabilities................................. 9,099 9,392
-------- --------
389,582 421,796
-------- --------
Contingencies and commitments............................... -- --
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value per share. Authorized
20,000,000 shares...................................... -- --
Common stock, $.10 par value per share. Authorized
60,000,000 shares,
issued 30,907,000 shares............................... 3,091 3,091
Additional paid-in capital................................ 175,575 175,231
Accumulated other comprehensive income.................... -- (317)
Retained earnings......................................... 202,608 168,495
-------- --------
381,274 346,500
Less cost of 7,025,000 shares in treasury (6,383,000 in
1999).................................................. 118,625 106,464
-------- --------
262,649 240,036
-------- --------
$749,268 $753,397
======== ========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

35
37

KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999 AND 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
($ IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT
PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Marine transportation..................................... $443,203 $290,956 $244,839
Diesel engine services.................................... 69,441 74,648 82,241
-------- -------- --------
512,644 365,604 327,080
-------- -------- --------
Costs and expenses:
Costs of sales and operating expenses..................... 315,435 233,078 212,242
Selling, general and administrative....................... 60,780 42,832 39,473
Taxes, other than on income............................... 10,223 8,576 7,646
Depreciation and other amortization....................... 42,502 29,653 26,783
Amortization of goodwill.................................. 5,702 1,625 600
Merger related charges.................................... 199 4,502 --
Impairment of long-lived assets........................... -- -- 8,333
-------- -------- --------
434,841 320,266 295,077
-------- -------- --------
Operating income.................................. 77,803 45,338 32,003
Equity in earnings of marine affiliates..................... 3,394 2,136 946
Equity in earnings of insurance affiliate................... -- -- 1,325
Loss on sale of insurance affiliate......................... -- -- (10,536)
Investment income and other................................. 337 965 1,658
Gain on disposition of assets............................... 1,161 64 3,517
Minority interests.......................................... (966) (273) --
Interest expense............................................ (23,917) (12,838) (11,898)
-------- -------- --------
Earnings before taxes on income................... 57,812 35,392 17,015
Provision for taxes on income............................... 23,699 13,951 6,906
-------- -------- --------
Net earnings...................................... $ 34,113 $ 21,441 $ 10,109
======== ======== ========
Net earnings per share of common stock:
Basic..................................................... $ 1.40 $ 1.01 $ .46
Diluted................................................... $ 1.39 $ 1.01 $ .46
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

36
38

KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999 AND 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
($ IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Common stock:
Balance at beginning and end of year.................... $ 3,091 $ 3,091 $ 3,091
========= ========= =========
Additional paid-in capital:
Balance at beginning of year............................ $ 175,231 $ 159,122 $ 159,016
Deficit of cost of treasury stock sold over proceeds
received upon exercise of stock options.............. (455) (697) (982)
Tax benefit realized from stock option plans............ 470 319 1,088
Adjustment for treasury stock reissued for
acquisition.......................................... 329 16,487 --
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at end of year.................................. $ 175,575 $ 175,231 $ 159,122
========= ========= =========
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
Balance at beginning of year............................ $ (317) $ 338 $ 572
Unrealized net gain (loss) in value of
available-for-sale securities, net of tax............ 317 (655) (234)
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at end of year.................................. $ -- $ (317) $ 338
========= ========= =========
Retained earnings:
Balance at beginning of year............................ $ 168,495 $ 147,054 $ 136,945
Net earnings for the year............................... 34,113 21,441 10,109
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at end of year.................................. $ 202,608 $ 168,495 $ 147,054
========= ========= =========
Treasury stock:
Balance at beginning of year............................ $(106,464) $(168,565) $ (81,355)
Purchase of treasury stock.............................. (15,791) (12,362) (91,247)
Cost of treasury stock sold upon exercise of stock
options.............................................. 2,157 1,364 4,037
Cost of treasury stock reissued for acquisition......... 1,473 73,099 --
--------- --------- ---------
Balance at end of year.................................. $(118,625) $(106,464) $(168,565)
========= ========= =========
Comprehensive income:
Net earnings for the year............................... $ 34,113 $ 21,441 $ 10,109
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax........... 317 (655) (234)
--------- --------- ---------
Total comprehensive income.............................. $ 34,430 $ 20,786 $ 9,875
========= ========= =========
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

37
39

KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999 AND 1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- ---------
($ IN THOUSANDS)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings.............................................. $ 34,113 $ 21,441 $ 10,109
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided
by operations:
Depreciation and amortization........................... 48,204 31,278 27,383
Provision (credit) for deferred income taxes............ 194 (511) (4,967)
Gain on disposition of assets........................... (1,161) (64) (3,517)
Equity in earnings of marine affiliates, net of
distributions and contributions........................ 2,197 985 3,461
Loss on sale of insurance affiliate..................... -- -- 10,536
Equity in earnings of insurance affiliate, net of
redemptions............................................ -- -- (1,325)
Merger related charges, net of cash expenditures........ 199 4,383 --
Impairment of long-lived assets......................... -- -- 8,333
Deferred scheduled maintenance costs.................... 370 301 923
Other................................................... 1,135 437 133
Increase (decrease) in cash flows resulting from changes
in:
Accounts receivable..................................... (8,171) 15,114 13,821
Inventory............................................... (955) 1,054 32
Other assets............................................ 2,944 (371) 3,729
Income taxes payable.................................... 3,249 2,074 (3,815)
Accounts payable........................................ 5,017 2,683 (13,994)
Accrued and other liabilities........................... (4,032) (6,435) (15,396)
-------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities........... 83,303 72,369 35,446
-------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale and maturities of investments.......... 13,568 6,697 1,950
Purchase of investments................................... -- -- (789)
Capital expenditures...................................... (47,683) (12,719) (27,445)
Acquisition of companies, net of cash acquired............ (7,942) (231,058) --
Proceeds from disposition of assets....................... 3,583 775 14,066
Proceeds from disposition of businesses................... -- -- 39,989
Proceeds from sale of insurance affiliate................. -- -- 36,000
Other..................................................... (40) -- (275)
-------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities.......................................... (38,514) (236,305) 63,496
-------- --------- ---------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings (payments) on bank revolving credit agreements,
net..................................................... 22,100 (16,000) (6,600)
Proceeds from senior credit facility...................... -- 200,000 --
Payments on long-term debt................................ (50,355) (5,333) (5,333)
Purchase of treasury stock................................ (15,791) (12,362) (91,247)
Return of investment to minority interests................ (996) (326) --
Proceeds from exercise of stock options................... 1,340 667 3,056
-------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities.......................................... (43,702) 166,646 (100,124)
-------- --------- ---------
Increase (decrease) in cash and invested cash....... 1,087 2,710 (1,182)
Cash and invested cash, beginning of year................... 3,571 861 2,043
-------- --------- ---------
Cash and invested cash, end of year......................... $ 4,658 $ 3,571 $ 861
======== ========= =========
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the year:
Interest................................................ $ 24,538 $ 12,242 $ 11,635
Income taxes............................................ $ 20,035 $ 10,329 $ 18,998
Noncash investing and financing activity:
Treasury stock reissued in acquisition.................... $ 1,802 $ 89,586 $ --
Cash acquired in acquisition.............................. $ 140 $ 88 $ --
Debt assumed in acquisition............................... $ 20 $ 56 $ --
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

38
40

KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000, 1999 AND 1998

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of Kirby Corporation and its subsidiaries ("the Company").
Affiliated limited partnerships over which the Company has effective control and
whose activities are an integral part of the operations of the Company have been
consolidated. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to reflect
the current presentation of financial information.

Accounting Policies:

Cash Equivalents. Cash equivalents consist of all short-term, highly
liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at date of purchase.

Available-for-Sale Securities. The Company's wholly owned captive
insurance subsidiary had available-for-sale investments reported at fair value
with the net unrealized gain or loss on such investments recorded as a separate
component of shareholders' equity, net of deferred tax. Investments were
recorded on a trade date basis with balances pending settlement accrued in the
balance sheet. Realized gains and losses on sales of investments were determined
by using the specific cost of the security when originally purchased. Investment
income was recognized when earned and included the amortization of premiums or
discounts on investments. All of the Company's available-for-sale securities
were sold in December 2000.

Accounts Receivable. In the normal course of business, the Company extends
credit to its customers. The Company regularly reviews the accounts and makes
adequate provisions for probable uncollectible balances. It is the Company's
opinion that the accounts have no impairment, other than that for which
provisions have been made. Included in accounts receivable as of December 31,
2000 and 1999 were $5,778,000 and $4,464,000, respectively, of accruals for
diesel engine services work in process which have not been invoiced as of the
end of each year.

The Company's marine transportation and diesel engine services operations
are subject to hazards associated with such businesses. The Company maintains
insurance coverage against these hazards with mutual insurance and reinsurance
companies. As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, the Company had receivables of
$3,465,000 and $4,128,000, respectively, from the mutual insurance and
reinsurance companies to cover claims over the Company's deductible.

Concentrations of Credit Risk. Financial instruments which potentially
subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily trade
accounts receivables. The Company's marine transportation customers include the
major oil refining and petrochemical companies. The diesel engine services
customers are offshore oil and gas service companies, inland and offshore marine
transportation companies, commercial fishing companies, power generation
companies, shortline and industrial railroads, and the United States government.
Credit risk with respect to these trade receivables is generally considered
minimal because of the credit history of such companies as well as the Company's
having procedures in effect to monitor the credit worthiness of customers.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. Cash, accounts receivable, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term
maturity of these financial instruments. The fair value of the Company's
investments is more fully described in Note 4, Investments, and the fair value
of the Company's debt instruments is more fully described in Note 5, Long-Term
Debt.

Property, Maintenance and Repairs. Property is recorded at cost.
Improvements and betterments are capitalized as incurred. Depreciation is
recorded on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
individual assets as follows: marine transportation equipment, 6-37 years;
buildings, 10-40 years; other equipment, 2-10 years; and leasehold improvements,
term of lease. When property items are retired, sold or

39
41
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- (CONTINUED)

otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed
from the accounts with any gain or loss on the disposition included in income.
Routine maintenance and repairs are charged to operating expense as incurred on
an annual basis. Scheduled major maintenance on ocean-going vessels is
recognized as prepaid maintenance costs when incurred and charged to operating
expense over the period between such scheduled maintenance, generally ranging
from 23 to 34 months.

Environmental Liabilities. The Company expenses costs related to
environmental events as they are incurred or when a loss is considered probable.

Goodwill. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of
identifiable net assets acquired in transactions accounted for as a purchase is
included in goodwill. The goodwill is amortized on the straight-line method over
the lesser of its expected useful life or 40 years. Management monitors the
recoverability of the goodwill on an ongoing basis based on projections of the
undiscounted future cash flows, excluding interest expense, of acquired assets.
The amount of goodwill impairment, if any, is measured based on projected
discounted future operating cash flows using a discount rate reflecting the
Company's average cost of funds. The assessment of the recoverability of
goodwill will be impacted if estimated future operating cash flows are not
achieved.

Revenue Recognition. The Company uses a voyage accounting method of
revenue recognition for its marine transportation revenues which allocates
voyage revenue and expenses based on the percent of the voyage completed during
the period. Diesel parts sales are recognized upon shipment to customers when
title passes. Diesel overhauls and repairs revenue recognition uses a percentage
of completion method which allocates revenue and expenses based on the
percentage of the project completed during the period.

Stock-Based Compensation. The intrinsic value method of accounting is used
for stock-based employee compensation whereby no compensation expense is
recorded when the stock option exercise price is equal to, or greater than, the
market price of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant. Income tax
benefits attributable to stock options exercised are credited to additional
paid-in capital.

Taxes on Income. The Company follows the asset and liability method of
accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and operating
loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return with its
domestic subsidiaries and its Bermudan subsidiary, Oceanic Insurance Limited
("Oceanic").

Minority Interests. The Company has a majority interest in and is the
general partner for the affiliated entities. In situations where losses
applicable to the minority interest in the affiliated entities exceed the
limited partners' equity capital, such excess and any further loss attributable
to the minority interest is charged against the Company's interest in the
affiliated entities. If future earnings materialize in the respective affiliated
entities, the Company's interest would be credited to the extent of any losses
previously absorbed.

Treasury Stock. The Company follows the average cost method of accounting
for treasury stock transactions.

40
42
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- (CONTINUED)

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed
Of. The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
Be Disposed Of" ("SFAS No. 121"). This Statement requires that long-lived assets
and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by
a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows
expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the
carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be
disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less
costs to sell.

In December 1999 and 1998, a marine partnership in which the Company owns a
50% interest, reduced the carrying values of an offshore dry-cargo barge and
tugboat unit by taking a $2,130,000 and $5,900,000, respectively, pre-tax
impairment charges in accordance with SFAS No. 121. The Company's portion of the
1999 charge was $1,065,000, and the after-tax effect of the charge to the
Company was $692,000, or $.03 per share. The Company's portion of the 1998
charge was $2,950,000, and the after-tax effect of the charge to the Company was
$1,918,000, or $.09 per share. The charges are reflected in equity in earnings
of marine affiliates on the 1999 and 1998 consolidated statements of earnings.

The 1998 impairment charge on the barge and tugboat unit was recognized
when the future undiscounted cash flows of the unit were estimated to be
insufficient to recover its carrying value. Accordingly, the unit was written
down to its estimated fair value based on estimated discounted cash flows.

The 1999 impairment charge was recognized when the Company's marine
partnership executed a contract to sell the tugboat. The barge, which was sold
in June 2000, was written down in 1999 to the Company's estimate of fair value
based on current market values of similar equipment. The sales price of the
barge approximated the revised carrying value.

In September 1998, the Company reduced the carrying value of an offshore
liquid tank barge and tugboat unit by taking an $8,333,000 pre-tax impairment
charge in accordance with SFAS No. 121. The after-tax effect of the charge was
$5,416,000, or $.24 per share. The unit was sold in October 1998 for a price
approximating the then carrying value of the unit.

(2) ACQUISITIONS

On October 12, 2000, the Company completed the acquisition of the Powerway
Division of Covington Detroit Diesel-Allison, Inc. ("Powerway") for $1,428,000
in cash. With the acquisition of Powerway, the Company became the sole
distributor of aftermarket parts and service for Alco diesel engines throughout
the United States for marine, power generation and industrial applications.
Goodwill is amortized over 10 years. On November 1, 2000, the Company completed
the acquisition of West Kentucky Machine Shop, Inc. ("West Kentucky") for an
aggregate consideration (before post-closing adjustments) of $6,674,000,
consisting of $6,629,000 in cash, the assumption of $20,000 of West Kentucky's
existing debt and $25,000 of merger costs. The acquisition of West Kentucky
provided the Company with increased distributorship capabilities with Falk
Corporation, a reduction gear manufacturer used in marine and industrial
applications. Goodwill is amortized over 15 years. The acquisitions were
accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Financing for the two
acquisitions was through the Company's revolving credit agreement.

On October 12, 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of Hollywood
Marine, Inc. ("Hollywood Marine"), by means of a merger of Hollywood Marine into
Kirby Inland Marine, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Pursuant to
the Agreement and Plan of Merger, the Company acquired Hollywood Marine for an
aggregate consideration (before post-closing adjustments) of $320,788,000,
41
43
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(2) ACQUISITIONS -- (CONTINUED)

consisting of $89,586,000 in common stock (4,384,000 shares at $20.44 per
share), $128,658,000 in cash, the assumption and refinancing of $99,185,000 of
Hollywood Marine's existing debt and $3,359,000 of merger costs. A final
post-closing working capital adjustment was completed on February 29, 2000 for
an additional $1,802,000 in common stock (88,000 shares at $20.44 per share).
The final total purchase consideration for the Hollywood Marine acquisition was
$322,590,000. C. Berdon Lawrence was the principal shareholder of Hollywood
Marine. Hollywood Marine's operations were included as part of the Company's
operations effective October 12, in accordance with the purchase method of
accounting. Goodwill is amortized over 30 years.

Hollywood Marine, located in Houston, Texas, was engaged in the inland tank
barge transportation of chemicals and petrochemicals, refined petroleum
products, pressurized products and black oil products primarily along the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway, the Houston Ship Channel and the lower Mississippi River.
Hollywood Marine operated a fleet of 270 inland tank barges, with 4.8 million
barrels of capacity, and 104 inland towboats.

The components of the purchase price and allocation were as follows (in
thousands):

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Consideration and merger costs:
Common stock (4,472 shares at $20.44 per share)........... $ 91,388
Proceeds of bank debt issued for cash portion of purchase
price and repayment of Hollywood Marine's existing
debt................................................... 227,787
Debt assumed.............................................. 56
Merger costs.............................................. 3,359
--------
$322,590
========
Allocation of purchase price:
Current assets............................................ $ 25,522
Property.................................................. 208,090
Goodwill.................................................. 161,250
Other assets.............................................. 5,949
Current liabilities....................................... (24,707)
Deferred income taxes..................................... (46,973)
Other liabilities......................................... (6,541)
--------
$322,590
========
</TABLE>

Financing for the cash portion of the transaction and the repayment of
Hollywood Marine's existing debt was through the Company's existing $100,000,000
bank revolving credit agreement with The Chase Manhattan Bank ("Chase") as agent
bank, and through a new $200,000,000 credit facility with Bank of America, N.A.
("Bank of America") as syndication agent bank; Chase as administrative agent;
and Bank One, Texas, N.A. as documentation agent.

In connection with the acquisition of Hollywood Marine, the Company
recorded $4,502,000 of pre-tax merger related charges ($2,912,000 after taxes,
or $.14 per share) in the fourth quarter of 1999 to combine the acquired
operations with those of the Company. Such charges were as follows (in
thousands):

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Severance for Company employees............................. $2,061
Exit of insurance mutual.................................... 870
Corporate headquarters lease abandonment.................... 1,571
------
$4,502
======
</TABLE>

42
44
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(2) ACQUISITIONS -- (CONTINUED)

The cash portion of the merger related charges totaled $3,248,000. The
non-cash portion of the charges consisted of $748,000 for the write-off of the
Company's leasehold improvements of its former corporate headquarters and
$506,000 for severance pay for changes in stock option terms.

In 2000, the Company recorded additional merger related charges of
$199,000, consisting of a $482,000 ($313,000 after taxes, or $.01 per share)
charge in June associated with the termination of the corporate headquarter's
lease, and a $283,000 ($184,000 after taxes, or $.01 per share) credit in
December to reduce the current estimates of remaining expenditures.

The components of the cash charge incurred, the actual cash payments made
and the accrued balances of December 31, 2000 were as follows (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 2000 ACCRUED AT
TOTAL CASH PAID IN TOTAL CASH PAID IN DECEMBER 31,
PORTION 1999 PORTION 2000 2000
---------- ------- ---------- ------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Severance for Company employees... $1,555 $ 13 $(268) $ 659 $615
Exit of insurance mutual.......... 870 -- -- 870 --
Corporate headquarters lease
abandonment..................... 823 106 366 707 376
------ ---- ----- ------ ----
$3,248 $119 $ 98 $2,236 $991
====== ==== ===== ====== ====
</TABLE>

The Company expects that the accrued severance remaining at December 31,
2000 will be paid by June 2001. The remaining corporate headquarters lease
abandonment reserve was paid in January 2001.

The following unaudited pro forma combined financial information for the
years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 was based on historical financial
information of the Company and Hollywood Marine. The financial information
assumes the merger was completed as of the beginning of the years indicated. The
unaudited pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations that would have occurred had the merger been consummated
at the beginning of the years indicated, nor is the information indicative of
the future results of operations (in thousands, except per share amounts):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Revenues.................................................... $497,060 $494,415
Earnings before taxes on income............................. $ 38,465 $ 20,640
Net earnings................................................ $ 21,782 $ 10,911
Net earnings per share of common stock -- diluted........... $ .85 $ .41
</TABLE>

(3) SALE OF REMAINING INTEREST IN UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Effective September 30, 1998, the Company sold its remaining 45% voting
common stock interest and its non-voting preferred stock interest in Universal
Insurance Company ("Universal") for $36,000,000 in cash. Universal, a property
and casualty insurance company in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, was formed by
the Company in 1972. In September 1992, the Company merged Universal with
Eastern America Insurance Company ("Eastern America"), a subsidiary of Eastern
America Insurance Group, Inc. ("Eastern America Group"). In accordance with a
shareholders agreement among the Company, Universal and Eastern America Group,
through redemption rights, Universal had the obligation to purchase the
Company's entire interest in Universal gradually, over a 15-year period. The
Company closed the sale on October 7, 1998, and the cash proceeds were used to
reduce the Company's revolving line of credit.

Under an anticipated redemption schedule, the Company would have received a
stream of cash payments between 1998 and the year 2008 totaling $62,000,000. The
$36,000,000 received represented the present value

43
45
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(3) SALE OF REMAINING INTEREST IN UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- (CONTINUED)

of the payment stream. Including prior redemptions and the final sale, the
Company received total payments of $58,000,000 for its interest in Universal.

The Company recognized, during the 1998 third quarter, a pre-tax loss for
financial purposes of $10,536,000 on the Universal transaction. The Company's
investment in Universal, accounted for under the equity method of accounting,
was based on the estimated receipt of $62,000,000 of redemption payments to the
Company over the next 11 years and the recording of the remaining built-in gain
on the sale.

(4) INVESTMENTS

The Company's wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary accounted for
investments in debt and equity securities in accordance with SFAS No. 115,
"Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities" ("SFAS No.
115"), which established certain criteria for the accounting and reporting of
investments in debt and equity securities that have readily determinable fair
values. Investments in debt and equity securities as of December 31, 1999 and
1998 qualify as available-for-sale securities in accordance with SFAS No. 115.
Realized gains and losses on the sale of the securities in the consolidated
statements of earnings were computed by using the specific cost of the security
when originally purchased and included net unrealized holding gains and losses
as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income and in the
reconciliation of comprehensive income included in the consolidated statements
of stockholders' equity, net of tax liability (benefit) of $(171,000) and
$182,000 at December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The available-for-sale
securities were sold in December 2000.

A summary of the investments as of December 31, 1999 was as follows (in
thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
GROSS GROSS FAIR VALUE AS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED SHOWN IN THE
TYPE OF INVESTMENT COST LOSSES GAINS BALANCE SHEET
- ------------------ --------- ---------- ---------- -------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Short-term investments...................... $ 935 $ -- $-- $ 935
Bonds and notes:
United States corporate bonds............. 4,308 (178) 54 4,184
United States government bonds and
issues................................. 2,703 (119) 11 2,595
Foreign government bonds.................. 1,379 (117) -- 1,262
Mortgage backed securities.................. 4,244 (129) -- 4,115
------- ----- --- -------
$13,569 $(543) $65 $13,091
======= ===== === =======
</TABLE>

A summary of the available-for-sale securities by maturities as of December
31, 1999 was as follows (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
AMORTIZED MARKET
COST VALUE
--------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Investments maturing within:
One to five years......................................... $ 2,034 $ 2,005
Five to 10 years.......................................... 5,874 5,715
Greater than 10 years..................................... 5,661 5,371
------- -------
$13,569 $13,091
======= =======
</TABLE>

44
46
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(5) LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt at December 31, 2000 and 1999 consisted of the following (in
thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999
-------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Long-term debt, including current portion:
Credit facility, maturing in varying amounts through
October 9, 2004........................................ $200,000 $200,000
Revolving credit agreement due September 19, 2002......... 32,100 10,000
Medium term notes due June 1, 2000........................ -- 45,000
Medium term notes due January 29, 2002.................... 50,000 50,000
8.22% senior notes, $5,000,000 due annually through June
30, 2002............................................... 10,000 15,000
Other long-term debt...................................... 1,272 1,607
-------- --------
$293,372 $321,607
======== ========
</TABLE>

The aggregate payments due on the long-term debt in each of the next five
years were as follows (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
2001..................................................... $ 5,335
2002..................................................... 99,936
2003..................................................... 50,336
2004..................................................... 137,725
2005..................................................... 4
Thereafter............................................... 36
--------
$293,372
========
</TABLE>

On October 12, 1999, the Company entered into a $200,000,000 senior credit
facility (the "Credit Facility") with a syndicate of banks, with Bank of America
as syndication agent bank, Chase as administrative agent and Bank One, Texas,
N.A. as documentation agent. The Credit Facility was used to finance the
acquisition of Hollywood Marine. The Credit Facility converted to a four-year
term loan on October 9, 2000, with quarterly principal payments of $12,500,000,
plus interest, due beginning October 9, 2002. The remaining principal and
interest is due on October 9, 2004, the maturity date of the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility contains certain covenants, the most restrictive of which
requires the Company to maintain consolidated minimum net worth, as defined, of
at least $207,475,000. The Company was in compliance with all Credit Facility
debt covenants as of December 31, 2000. At December 31, 2000, the amount
borrowed under the Credit Facility totaled $200,000,000 and the interest rate
was 7.68%. The average borrowing under the Credit Facility during 2000 was
$195,887,000, computed by using the daily balance, and the weighted average
interest rate was 7.32%, computed by dividing the interest expense under the
Credit Facility by the average Credit Facility borrowings.

The Company has a $100,000,000 revolving credit agreement (the "Credit
Agreement") with Chase as agent bank. The Credit Agreement contains certain
covenants, the most restrictive of which requires the Company to maintain
consolidated minimum net worth, as defined, of at least $129,673,000. The
Company was in compliance with all Credit Agreement debt covenants as of
December 31, 2000. Proceeds under the Credit Agreement may be used for general
corporate purposes, the purchase of existing or new equipment, the purchase of
the Company's common stock or for possible business acquisitions. At December
31, 2000, the amount outstanding under the Credit Agreement totaled $32,100,000
and the average interest rate was 7.07%. The average borrowing under the Credit
Agreement during 2000 was $30,993,000, computed by using the daily balance, and
the weighted average interest rate was 7.38%, computed by dividing the interest
expense under the Credit Agreement by the average Credit Agreement borrowings.
The maximum Credit Agreement

45
47
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(5) LONG-TERM DEBT -- (CONTINUED)

borrowings outstanding at any month end during 2000 totaled $67,500,000. At
December 31, 2000, the Company had $67,900,000 available for takedown under the
Credit Agreement.

The Company has on file a shelf registration on Form S-3 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission providing for the issue of up to $250,000,000
of medium term notes ("Medium Term Notes") at fixed or floating interest rates
with maturities of nine months or longer. The $121,000,000 available balance as
of December 31, 2000 may be used for future business and equipment acquisitions,
working capital requirements and reductions of the Company's Credit Agreement
and Credit Facility. Activities under the Medium Term Notes program have been as
follows (dollars in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
OUTSTANDING INTEREST AVAILABLE
BALANCE RATE BALANCE
----------- -------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Medium Term Notes program.............................. $ -- $250,000
Issuance March 1995 (Maturity March 10, 1997).......... 34,000 7.77% 216,000
Issuance June 1995 (Maturity June 1, 2000)............. 45,000 7.25% 171,000
--------
Outstanding December 31, 1995 and 1996................. 79,000 171,000
Issuance January 1997 (Maturity January 29, 2002)...... 50,000 7.05% 121,000
Payment March 1997..................................... (34,000) 121,000
--------
Outstanding December 31, 1997, 1998 and 1999........... 95,000 121,000
Payment June 2000...................................... (45,000) 121,000
--------
Outstanding December 31, 2000.......................... $ 50,000 121,000
========
</TABLE>

On November 7, 2000, the Company entered into a new $10,000,000 uncommitted
line of credit with Bank of America whereby the Company may request, and Bank of
America will consider, short-term advances and the issuance of letters of credit
through the maturity date of November 6, 2001. As of December 31, 2000, the
uncommitted line of credit had not been activated.

In August 1992, the Company's principal marine transportation subsidiary
entered into a $50,000,000 private placement of 8.22% senior notes due June 30,
2002. Principal payments of $5,000,000, plus interest, are due annually through
June 30, 2002. At December 31, 2000, $10,000,000 was outstanding under the
senior notes.

At December 31, 1999, the Company was party to an interest rate swap for a
notional amount of $20,000,000 under which the Company paid interest at a rate
of 7.28% and received interest using a 90-day LIBOR base rate. The interest rate
swap was acquired in the merger with Hollywood Marine and terminated on March
27, 2000. The change in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreement was
recognized from the date of acquisition to March 27, 2000 in the consolidated
statements of earnings.

The Company is of the opinion that the amounts included in the consolidated
financial statements for outstanding debt materially represent the fair value of
such debt at December 31, 2000 and 1999.

46
48
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(6) TAXES ON INCOME

Earnings before taxes on income and details of the provision for taxes on
income for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 were as follows (in
thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Earnings before taxes on income:
United States......................................... $57,812 $35,392 $15,690
Puerto Rico........................................... -- -- 1,325
------- ------- -------
$57,812 $35,392 $17,015
======= ======= =======
Provision (credit) for taxes on income:
Federal
Current............................................ $22,022 $13,374 $11,016
Deferred........................................... 294 (490) (5,017)
State and local....................................... 1,383 1,067 907
------- ------- -------
$23,699 $13,951 $ 6,906
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>

During the three years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, tax benefits
related to the exercise of stock options that were allocated directly to
additional paid-in capital totaled $470,000, $319,000 and $1,088,000,
respectively.

The Company's provision for taxes on income varied from the statutory
federal income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 due
to the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
United States income tax statutory rate..................... 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit............... 1.6 2.0 3.5
Non-deductible goodwill amortization........................ 3.5 1.4 .7
Other non-deductible items.................................. .9 1.0 1.4
---- ---- ----
41.0% 39.4% 40.6%
==== ==== ====
</TABLE>

47
49
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(6) TAXES ON INCOME -- (CONTINUED)

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant
portions of the current deferred tax assets and non-current deferred tax assets
and liabilities at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 were as follows (in
thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
-------- --------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current deferred tax assets:
Compensated absences.............................. $ 934 $ 744 $ 659
Allowance for doubtful accounts................... 286 232 356
Insurance accruals................................ 1,974 2,146 (203)
Merger charges.................................... 407 1,226 --
Other............................................. 120 610 375
-------- --------- --------
$ 3,721 $ 4,958 $ 1,187
======== ========= ========
Non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities:
Deferred tax assets:
Postretirement health care benefits............ $ 2,303 2,101 1,962
Insurance accruals............................. 2,130 1,974 764
Deferred compensation.......................... 1,004 1,275 79
Other.......................................... 3,459 2,450 1,644
-------- --------- --------
8,896 7,800 4,449
-------- --------- --------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property....................................... (92,166) (93,683) (43,703)
Deferred state taxes........................... (5,265) (5,579) (757)
Scheduled vessel maintenance costs............. (54) (184) (34)
Other.......................................... (549) (1,148) --
-------- --------- --------
(98,034) (100,594) (44,494)
-------- --------- --------
$(89,138) $ (92,794) $(40,045)
======== ========= ========
</TABLE>

As of December 31, 2000, the Company has determined that it is more likely
than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized and a valuation allowance
for such assets is not required.

(7) LEASES

The Company and its subsidiaries currently lease various facilities and
equipment under a number of cancelable and noncancelable operating leases. Total
rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 were as
follows (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Rental expense:
Marine equipment......................................... $2,834 $1,803 $1,803
Other buildings and equipment............................ 2,361 1,694 1,423
Sublease rental............................................ (20) (12) (10)
------ ------ ------
Net rental expense............................... $5,175 $3,485 $3,216
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>

48
50
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(7) LEASES -- (CONTINUED)

Rental commitments under noncancelable leases as of December 31, 2000 were
as follows (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
LAND,
BUILDINGS
AND EQUIPMENT
-------------
<S> <C>
2001.................................................. $ 5,195
2002.................................................. 4,049
2003.................................................. 3,816
2004.................................................. 3,631
2005.................................................. 3,513
Thereafter............................................ 3,382
-------
$23,586
=======
</TABLE>

(8) STOCK OPTION PLANS

The Company has four employee stock option plans which were adopted in
1982, 1989, 1994 and 1996 for selected officers and other key employees. The
1982 Employee Plan provided for the issuance until 1992 of incentive and
non-qualified stock options to purchase up to 600,000 shares of common stock.
The 1989 Employee Plan provided for the issuance until July 1999 of incentive
and nonincentive stock options to purchase up to 600,000 shares of common stock.
The 1994 Employee Plan provides for the issuance of incentive and non-qualified
stock options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock. The 1996
Employee Plan provides for the issuance of incentive and non-qualified stock
options to purchase up to 900,000 shares of common stock. The 1982 and 1989
stock option plans authorized the granting of limited stock appreciation rights.

Changes in options outstanding under the employee plans described above for
the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NON-QUALIFIED OR
NONINCENTIVE
STOCK OPTIONS
------------------------- OPTION PRICE
OUTSTANDING EXERCISABLE RANGE PER SHARE
----------- ----------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding December 31, 1997................... 1,917,350 794,775 $ 3.69-$21.38
Granted....................................... 18,000 -- $19.88
Became exercisable............................ -- 108,537 $16.31-$21.38
Exercised..................................... (288,300) (288,300) $ 3.69-$21.38
Canceled or expired........................... (96,100) (1,050) $16.31-$19.50
--------- --------
Outstanding December 31, 1998................... 1,550,950 613,962 $ 6.56-$21.38
Granted....................................... 195,500 -- $17.28-$19.50
Became exercisable............................ -- 74,488 $16.31-$19.88
Exercised..................................... (60,850) (60,850) $ 8.19-$18.31
Canceled or expired........................... (875) (875) $16.31
--------- --------
Outstanding December 31, 1999................... 1,684,725 626,725 $ 6.56-$21.38
Granted....................................... 389,000 -- $18.06
Became exercisable............................ -- 71,500 $16.44-$19.88
Exercised..................................... (113,575) (113,575) $ 6.56-$18.56
Canceled or expired........................... (4,000) (2,000) $18.06-$18.19
--------- --------
Outstanding December 31, 2000................... 1,956,150 582,650 $12.94-$21.38
========= ========
</TABLE>

49
51
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(8) STOCK OPTION PLANS -- (CONTINUED)

At December 31, 2000, 184,575 shares were available for future grants under
the employee plans and no shares of the outstanding stock options under the
employee plans were issued with limited stock appreciation rights.

Prior to September 22, 2000, the Company had three director stock option
plans for nonemployee directors of the Company. Effective September 22, 2000,
the Company's directors adopted a 2000 Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan
(the "Current Director Plan") which replaced the 1989 Director Stock Option Plan
(the "1989 Director Plan"), the 1994 Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan (the
"1994 Director Plan") and the 2000 Director Stock Option Plan (the "2000
Director Plan"). The 1989 Director Plan provided for the issuance until July
1999 of nonincentive options to directors of the Company to purchase up to
150,000 shares of common stock. The 1994 Director Plan provided for the issuance
of non-qualified options to directors of the Company, including advisory
directors, to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock. The 2000 Director
Plan provided for the issuance of nonincentive options to directors of the
Company to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock. The Current Director
Plan provides for the issuance of nonincentive options to directors of the
Company to purchase up to 300,000 shares of common stock. The Current Director
Plan provides for the automatic grants of stock options to nonemployee directors
on the date of first election as a director and after each annual meeting of
stockholders. In addition, the Current Director Plan provides for the issuance
of stock options in lieu of cash for all or part of the annual director fee. The
director stock option plans are intended as an incentive to attract and retain
qualified and competent independent directors.

Changes in options outstanding under the director plans described above for
the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 were as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NON-QUALIFIED OR
NONINCENTIVE
STOCK OPTIONS
------------------------- OPTION PRICE
OUTSTANDING EXERCISABLE RANGE PER SHARE
----------- ----------- ---------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding December 31, 1997................... 93,500 93,500 $ 7.56-$21.38
Granted....................................... 17,000 -- $19.88-$25.50
Became exercisable............................ -- 17,000 $19.88-$25.50
------- -------
Outstanding December 31, 1998................... 110,500 110,500 $ 7.56-$25.50
Granted....................................... 10,500 -- $19.38
Became exercisable............................ -- 10,500 $19.38
Exercised..................................... (30,000) (30,000) $7.56
------- -------
Outstanding December 31, 1999................... 91,000 91,000 $16.63-$25.50
Granted....................................... 25,984 -- $18.31-$21.34
Became exercisable............................ -- 22,882 $18.31-$21.34
Exercised..................................... (19,500) (19,500) $16.63-$18.63
Canceled or expired........................... (11,000) (11,000) $19.06-$25.50
------- -------
Outstanding December 31, 2000................... 86,484 83,382 $16.63-$25.50
======= =======
</TABLE>

The Company has a 1993 nonqualified stock option for 25,000 shares granted
to Robert G. Stone, Jr., at an exercise price of $18.625, all of which are
currently exercisable. The grant served as an incentive to retain the optionee
as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.

50
52
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(8) STOCK OPTION PLANS -- (CONTINUED)

The following table summarizes pro forma net earnings and earnings per
share for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 assuming the Company
had used the fair value method of accounting for its stock option plans (in
thousands, except per share amounts):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
----------------------- ----------------------- -----------------------
AS REPORTED PRO FORMA AS REPORTED PRO FORMA AS REPORTED PRO FORMA
----------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Net earnings............... $34,113 $31,623 $21,441 $19,536 $10,109 $7,598
Net earnings per share:
Basic.................... $ 1.40 $ 1.30 $ 1.01 $ .92 $ .46 $ .35
Diluted.................. $ 1.39 $ 1.29 $ 1.01 $ .92 $ .46 $ .34
</TABLE>

The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2000, 1999 and
1998 was $10.27, $13.50 and $15.71, respectively. The fair value of each option
was determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The key input
variables used in valuing the options were as follows: average risk-free
interest rate based on five- and 10-year Treasury bonds -- 4.8% for 2000, 5.2%
for 1999 and 5.6% for 1998; stock price volatility -- 70% for 2000, 66% for 1999
and 59% for 1998; and estimated option term -- nine years.

(9) RETIREMENT PLANS

The Company sponsors a defined benefit plan for vessel personnel. Shoreside
personnel formerly employed by Hollywood Marine also are participants in the
plan, but ceased to accrue additional benefits effective January 1, 2000. The
plan benefits are based on an employee's years of service and compensation. The
plan assets primarily consist of fixed income securities and corporate stocks.
Funding of the plan is based on actuarial computations that are designed to
satisfy minimum funding requirements of applicable regulations and to achieve
adequate funding of projected benefit obligations.

The Company sponsors an unfunded defined benefit health care plan that
provides limited postretirement medical benefits to employees who meet minimum
age and service requirements, and to eligible dependents. The plan is
contributory, with retiree contributions, adjusted annually. The Company also
has an unfunded defined benefit executive retirement plan that it assumed in the
Hollywood Marine acquisition. That plan ceased to accrue additional benefits
effective January 1, 2000.

51
53
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(9) RETIREMENT PLANS -- (CONTINUED)

The following table presents the funded status and amounts recognized in
the Company's consolidated balance sheet for the Company's defined benefit plans
and postretirement benefit plans (dollars in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
PENSION BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS
----------------- -----------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
------- ------- --------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION
Benefit obligation at beginning of year.... $41,112 $21,928 $ 6,486 $ 5,855
Service cost............................... 1,751 1,442 513 373
Interest cost.............................. 3,021 1,874 535 429
Amendments................................. (2,210) -- 401 --
Actuarial gain............................. (905) (3,529) (507) (992)
Acquisition................................ -- 20,318 -- 1,150
Benefits paid.............................. (1,677) (921) (482) (309)
Less partnerships' allocation.............. -- -- 22 (20)
------- ------- ------- -------
Benefit obligation at end of year.......... 41,092 41,112 6,968 6,486
------- ------- ------- -------
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of
year.................................... 45,407 20,884 -- --
Actual return on plan assets............... 603 2,424 -- --
Employer contribution...................... -- -- 482 309
Acquisition................................ -- 23,020 -- --
Benefits paid.............................. (1,677) (921) (482) (309)
------- ------- ------- -------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year... 44,333 45,407 -- --
------- ------- ------- -------
Funded status.............................. 3,241 4,295 (6,968) (6,486)
Unrecognized net actuarial gain............ (2,527) (5,295) (1,254) (796)
Unrecognized prior service cost............ (934) 1,188 436 67
Unrecognized net transition obligation..... 24 40 -- --
Other...................................... -- -- 41 28
------- ------- ------- -------
Net amount recognized at end of year....... $ (196) $ 228 $(7,745) $(7,187)
======= ======= ======= =======
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ASSUMPTIONS
Discount rate.............................. 7.75% 7.75% 7.75% 7.75%
Expected return on plan assets............. 9.25% 9.25% -- --
Average rate of compensation increase...... 4.00% 4.00% -- --
</TABLE>

52
54
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(9) RETIREMENT PLANS -- (CONTINUED)

The components of net periodic benefit cost were as follows (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
PENSION BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS
--------------------------- -----------------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
------- ------- ------- ------- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Service cost........................ $ 1,751 $ 1,442 $ 1,143 $ 513 $373 $317
Interest cost....................... 3,021 1,874 1,402 535 429 415
Expected return on assets........... (4,130) (2,358) (1,691) -- -- --
Amortization of transition
obligation........................ 17 17 17 -- -- --
Amortization of prior service
cost.............................. (89) 259 258 32 5 5
Amortization of actuarial gain...... (146) -- (47) (49) -- --
Less partnerships' allocation....... (52) (73) (85) 22 (20) (20)
Curtailment charge.................. -- -- 22 -- -- --
------- ------- ------- ------ ---- ----
Net periodic benefit cost........... $ 372 $ 1,161 $ 1,019 $1,053 $787 $717
======= ======= ======= ====== ==== ====
</TABLE>

The Company's unfunded defined benefit health care plan, which provides
limited postretirement medical benefits, limits cost increases in the Company's
contribution to 4% per year, excluding grandfathered Hollywood Marine retirees.
For measurement purposes, the assumed health care cost trend rate was 13% for
2000, declining gradually to 5% by 2006 and remaining at that level thereafter.
Accordingly, a 1% increase in the health care cost trend rate assumption would
have an immaterial effect on the amounts reported.

In addition to the defined benefit plan and postretirement medical benefit
plan, the Company sponsors defined contribution plans for all shore-based
employees and certain vessel personnel. Maximum contributions to these plans
equal the lesser of 15% of the aggregate compensation paid to all participating
employees or up to 20% of each subsidiary's earnings before federal income tax
after certain adjustments for each fiscal year. The aggregate contributions to
the plans were $6,609,000, $4,304,000 and $3,744,000 in 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.

(10) EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

The following table presents the components of basic and diluted earnings
per share for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 (in thousands,
except per share amounts):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net earnings............................................ $34,113 $21,441 $10,109
======= ======= =======
Shares outstanding:
Weighted average common stock outstanding............. 24,401 21,172 21,847
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee and director common stock options............ 165 121 266
------- ------- -------
24,566 21,293 22,113
======= ======= =======
Basic earnings per share of common stock................ $ 1.40 $ 1.01 $ .46
======= ======= =======
Diluted earnings per share of common stock.............. $ 1.39 $ 1.01 $ .46
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>

Certain outstanding options to purchase approximately 1,103,000, 1,030,000
and 77,000 shares of common stock were excluded in the computation of diluted
earnings per share as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively, as such
stock options would have been antidilutive.

53
55
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(11) QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)

The unaudited quarterly results for the year ended December 31, 2000 were
as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
---------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, JUNE 30, SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
2000 2000 2000 2000
--------- -------- ------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues............................... $126,456 $130,208 $129,108 $126,872
Costs and expenses..................... 111,040 108,750 108,343 106,509
Merger related charges (credits)....... -- 482 -- (283)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Operating income..................... 15,416 20,976 20,765 20,646
Equity in earnings of marine
affiliates........................... 837 804 821 932
Investment income and other............ 187 114 75 (39)
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets... 49 1,019 96 (3)
Minority interests..................... (343) (209) (281) (133)
Interest expense....................... (5,863) (5,964) (6,089) (6,001)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Earnings before taxes on income...... 10,283 16,740 15,387 15,402
Provision for taxes on income.......... (4,216) (6,860) (6,309) (6,314)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net earnings......................... $ 6,067 $ 9,880 $ 9,078 $ 9,088
======== ======== ======== ========
Net earnings per share of common stock:
Basic................................ $ .25 $ .40 $ .37 $ .38
======== ======== ======== ========
Diluted.............................. $ .25 $ .40 $ .37 $ .38
======== ======== ======== ========
</TABLE>

The unaudited quarterly results for the year ended December 31, 1999 were
as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
THREE MONTHS ENDED
---------------------------------------------------
MARCH 31, JUNE 30, SEPTEMBER 30, DECEMBER 31,
1999 1999 1999 1999(*)
--------- -------- ------------- ------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues................................ $78,481 $84,055 $80,504 $122,564
Costs and expenses...................... 70,582 71,611 68,595 104,976
Merger related charges.................. -- -- -- 4,502
------- ------- ------- --------
Operating income...................... 7,899 12,444 11,909 13,086
Equity in earnings (loss) of marine
affiliates............................ 881 609 917 (271)
Investment income and other............. 155 191 494 125
Gain (loss) on disposition of assets.... 32 3 (27) 56
Minority interests...................... -- -- -- (273)
Interest expense........................ (2,545) (2,569) (2,289) (5,435)
------- ------- ------- --------
Earnings before taxes on income....... 6,422 10,678 11,004 7,288
Provision for taxes on income........... (2,421) (4,076) (4,140) (3,314)
------- ------- ------- --------
Net earnings.......................... $ 4,001 $ 6,602 $ 6,864 $ 3,974
======= ======= ======= ========
Net earnings per share of common stock:
Basic................................. $ .20 $ .33 $ .34 $ .17
======= ======= ======= ========
Diluted............................... $ .20 $ .33 $ .34 $ .16
======= ======= ======= ========
</TABLE>

54
56
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(11) QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED) -- (CONTINUED)

- ---------------

(*) Included the acquisition of Hollywood Marine, effective October 12, 1999,
and the impairment of an offshore barge in a marine partnership in which the
Company owned a 50% interest.

Quarterly basic and diluted earnings per share of common stock may not
total to the full year per share amounts, as the weighted average number of
shares outstanding for each quarter fluctuates as a result of shares repurchased
by the Company and the assumed exercise of stock options.

(12) CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS

On January 9, 2001, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), in
conjunction with other federal and state law enforcement officials, executed a
warrant to seize records pertaining to the dry cargo barge cleaning operations
of a subsidiary of the Company located in Highlands, Texas. The dry-cargo barges
cleaned last carried cargoes such as grain, coal, steel and other dry-bulk
commodities. Based on the information available at present to the Company, the
EPA is investigating possible violations of the Clean Water Act by the
subsidiary. The Company is cooperating with federal and state officials in the
investigation. As the investigation is in its preliminary stage, the Company is
unable to ascertain the extent of its exposure, if any, in this matter.

In August 2000, the Company and four affiliates were among a large group of
companies that received a request for information from the EPA pursuant to
Section 104 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act concerning a potential Superfund site, the Palmer Barge Line Site,
located in Port Arthur, Texas. In October 2000, the Company submitted its
response to the EPA's request. Based on the information currently available, the
Company is unable to ascertain the extent of its exposure, if any, in this
matter.

In addition, there are various other suits and claims against the Company,
none of which in the opinion of management will have a material effect on the
Company's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Management
has recorded necessary reserves and believes that it has adequate insurance
coverage or has meritorious defenses for these other claims and contingencies.

Certain Significant Risks and Uncertainties. The Company's marine
transportation segment is engaged in the inland marine transportation of
industrial chemicals, petrochemical feedstocks, agricultural chemicals, refined
petroleum products, pressurized products and black oil products by tank barge
along the Mississippi River System, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and Houston Ship
Channel. In addition, the segment is engaged in the offshore marine
transportation of dry-bulk cargo by barge. Such products are transported between
United States ports, with an emphasis on the Gulf of Mexico and along the
Atlantic Seaboard and Caribbean Basin ports, with occasional voyages to South
American ports.

The Company's diesel engine services segment is engaged in the overhaul and
repair of large medium-speed diesel engines and related parts sales in the
marine, power generation and industrial, and railroad markets. The marine market
serves vessels powered by large diesel engines utilized in the various inland
and offshore marine industries. The power generation and industrial market
serves users of diesel engines that provide standby, peak and base load power
generation, users of industrial gears such as cement, paper and mining
industries, and provides parts for the nuclear industry. The railroad market
provides parts and service for diesel-electric locomotives used by shortline and
industrial railroads.

As of December 31, 2000, the marine transportation segment accounted for
90% of the Company's assets and the diesel engine services segment accounted for
6%. This compares with December 31, 1999, when the marine transportation segment
accounted for 89% of the Company's assets and the diesel engine services segment
accounted for 4%. Of total consolidated revenues during the 2000 and 1999 years,
the marine

55
57
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(12) CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

transportation segment generated 86% and 80%, respectively, and the diesel
engine services segment generated 14% and 20%, respectively. Operating profits
for the 2000 and 1999 years, excluding equity in earnings of affiliates and
general corporate expenses, included a contribution of 92% and 87%,
respectively, from the marine transportation segment and 8% and 13%,
respectively, from the diesel engine services segment. The increased percentage
by the marine transportation segment in each category for 2000 over 1999 was
primarily due to the acquisition of Hollywood Marine, more fully described in
Note 2, Acquisitions.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. However, in
the opinion of management, the amounts would be immaterial.

The customer base includes the major industrial chemical and petrochemical
manufacturers, agricultural chemical manufacturers and refining companies in the
United States. Approximately 70% of the movements of such products are under
long-term contracts, ranging from one year to 10 years. While the manufacturing
and refining companies have generally been customers of the Company for numerous
years (some as long as 30 years) and management anticipates a continuing
relationship, there is no assurance that any individual contract will be
renewed. The Dow Chemical Company accounted for 10% of the Company's revenues in
2000, 12% in 1999 and 13% in 1998.

Major customers of the diesel engine services segment include the inland
and offshore dry-bulk and tank barge operators, oil service companies,
petrochemical companies, offshore fishing companies, other marine transportation
entities, the United States Coast Guard and Navy, shortline railroads,
industrial owners of locomotives, and power generation and industrial companies.
The segment operates as an authorized distributor in 17 eastern states and the
Caribbean, and as non-exclusive authorized service centers for EMD throughout
the rest of the United States for marine power generation and industrial
applications. The railroad portion of the segment serves as the exclusive
distributorship of EMD aftermarket parts sales and services to the shortline and
industrial railroad market. The Company also serves as the exclusive distributor
of EMD parts to the nuclear industry. The results of the diesel engine services
segment are largely tied to the industries it serves and, therefore, can be
influenced by the cycles of such industries. The diesel engine services
segment's relationship with EMD has been maintained for 35 years. No single
customer of the diesel engine services segment accounted for more than 10% of
the Company's revenues in 2000, 1999 and 1998.

Weather can be a major factor in the day-to-day operations of the marine
transportation segment. Adverse weather conditions, such as fog in the winter
and spring months, can impair the operating efficiencies of the fleet. Shipments
of products can be significantly delayed or postponed by weather conditions,
which are totally beyond the control of management. River conditions are also
factors which impair the efficiency of the fleet and can result in delays,
diversions and limitations on night passages, and dictate horsepower
requirements and size of tows. Additionally, much of the inland waterway system
is controlled by a series of locks and dams designed to provide flood control,
maintain pool levels of water in certain areas of the country and facilitate
navigation on the inland river system. Maintenance and operation of the
navigable inland waterway infrastructure is a government function handled by the
Corps of Engineers with costs shared by industry. Significant changes in
governmental policies or appropriations with respect to maintenance and
operation of the infrastructure could adversely affect the Company.

The Company's marine transportation segment is subject to regulation by the
United States Coast Guard, federal laws, state laws and certain international
conventions. The Company believes that additional safety, environmental and
occupational health regulations may be imposed on the marine industry. There can
be no

56
58
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(12) CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

assurance that any such new regulations or requirements, or any discharge of
pollutants by the Company, will not have an adverse effect on the Company.

The Company's marine transportation segment competes principally in markets
subject to the Jones Act, a federal cabotage law that restricts domestic marine
transportation in the United States to vessels built and registered in the
United States, and manned and owned by United States citizens. During the past
several years, the Jones Act cabotage provisions have come under attack by
interests seeking to facilitate foreign flag competition in trades reserved for
domestic companies and vessels under the Jones Act. The efforts have been
consistently defeated by large margins in the United States Congress. The
Company believes that continued efforts will be made to modify or eliminate the
cabotage provisions of the Jones Act. If such efforts are successful, certain
elements could have an adverse effect on the Company.

(13) SEGMENT DATA

The Company's operations are classified into two reportable business
segments as follows:

Marine Transportation -- Marine transportation by U.S. flag vessels on the
United States inland waterway system and in United States coastwise trade. The
principal products transported on the United States inland waterway system
include industrial chemicals, petrochemical feedstocks, agricultural chemicals,
refined petroleum products, pressurized products and black oil products. The
principal products transported in U.S. coastwise trade include coal, limestone,
grain and sugar.

Diesel Engine Services -- Overhaul and repair of large medium-speed diesel
engines, reduction gear repair, and sale of related parts and accessories for
customers in the marine, power generation and industrial, and railroad
industries.

The Company's two reportable business segments are managed separately based
on fundamental differences in their operations. The Company's accounting
policies for the business segments are the same as those described in Note 1,
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The Company evaluates the
performance of its segments based on the contributions to operating income of
the respective segments, and before income taxes, interest, gains or losses on
disposition of assets, other nonoperating income, minority interests, accounting
changes, and nonrecurring items. Intersegment sales for 2000, 1999 and 1998 were
not significant.

57
59
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(13) SEGMENT DATA -- (CONTINUED)
The following table sets forth by reportable segment the revenues, profit
or loss, total assets, depreciation and amortization, and capital expenditures
attributable to the principal activities of the Company for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Marine transportation.............................. $443,203 $290,956 $244,839
Diesel engine services............................. 69,441 74,648 82,241
-------- -------- --------
$512,644 $365,604 $327,080
======== ======== ========
Segment profit (loss):
Marine transportation.............................. $ 78,100 $ 47,525 $ 37,661
Diesel engine services............................. 6,955 7,129 8,050
Other.............................................. (27,243) (19,262) (28,696)
-------- -------- --------
$ 57,812 $ 35,392 $ 17,015
======== ======== ========
Total assets:
Marine transportation.............................. $673,999 $673,882 $301,020
Diesel engine services............................. 45,344 32,890 38,588
Other.............................................. 29,925 46,625 50,691
-------- -------- --------
$749,268 $753,397 $390,299
======== ======== ========
Depreciation and amortization:
Marine transportation.............................. $ 45,321 $ 27,876 $ 23,977
Diesel engine services............................. 691 842 917
Other.............................................. 2,192 2,560 2,489
-------- -------- --------
$ 48,204 $ 31,278 $ 27,383
======== ======== ========
Capital expenditures:
Marine transportation.............................. $ 43,205 $ 11,735 $ 24,521
Diesel engine services............................. 351 533 1,103
Other.............................................. 4,127 451 1,821
-------- -------- --------
$ 47,683 $ 12,719 $ 27,445
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>

The following table presents the details of "Other" segment profit (loss)
for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
General corporate expenses........................... $ (7,053) $ (4,814) $ (5,375)
Interest expense..................................... (23,917) (12,838) (11,898)
Equity in earnings of affiliates..................... 3,394 2,136 2,271
Gain on disposition of assets........................ 1,161 64 3,517
Minority interests................................... (966) (273) --
Impairment of long-lived assets...................... -- -- (8,333)
Loss on sale of equity investment.................... -- -- (10,536)
Merger related charges............................... (199) (4,502) --
Investment income and other.......................... 337 965 1,658
-------- -------- --------
$(27,243) $(19,262) $(28,696)
======== ======== ========
</TABLE>

58
60
KIRBY CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED)

(13) SEGMENT DATA -- (CONTINUED)

The following table presents the details of "Other" total assets as of
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
General corporate assets................................ $17,141 $31,684 $37,896
Investments in affiliates............................... 12,784 14,941 12,795
------- ------- -------
$29,925 $46,625 $50,691
======= ======= =======
</TABLE>

59
61

PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

1. Financial Statements:

Included in Part III of this report:

Report of KPMG LLP, Independent Public Accountants, on the financial
statements of Kirby Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries for the years
ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.

Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, 2000 and 1999.

Consolidated Statements of Earnings, for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity, for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, for the years ended December 31,
2000, 1999 and 1998.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for the years ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.

2. Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or
the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related
notes.

3. Reports on Form 8-K

There were no reports on Form 8-K filed for the three months ended December
31, 2000.

4. Exhibits

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
- ------- ----------------------
<C> <S>
3.1 -- Restated Articles of Incorporation of Kirby Exploration
Company, Inc. (the "Company"), as amended (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant's 1989
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Reg. No. 33-30832)).
3.2 -- Certificate of Amendment of Restated Articles of
Incorporation of the Company filed with the Secretary of
State of Nevada April 30, 1990 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990).
3.3 -- Bylaws of the Company, as amended (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2 of the Registrant's July 20, 2000
Registration Statement on Form 8A (Reg. No. 01-07615)).
4.1 -- Indenture, dated as of December 2, 1994, between the
Company and Texas Commerce Bank National Association,
Trustee, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the
Registrant's 1994 Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Reg. No. 33-56195)).
4.2 -- Rights Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2000, between
Kirby Corporation and Fleet National Bank, a national
bank association, which includes the Form of Resolutions
Establishing Designations, Preference and Rights of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Kirby
Corporation, the form of Rights Certificate and the
Summary of Rights (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
July 18, 2000).
</TABLE>

60
62

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
- ------- ----------------------
<C> <S>
10.1+ -- 1982 Stock Option Plan for Kirby Exploration Company, and
forms of option agreements provided for thereunder and
related documents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.5 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1982).
10.2+ -- Amendment to 1982 Stock Option Plan for Kirby Exploration
Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1986).
10.3 -- Indemnification Agreement, dated April 29, 1986, between
the Company and each of its Directors and certain key
employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of
the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1986).
10.4+ -- 1989 Employee Stock Option Plan for the Company, as
amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of
the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1989).
10.5+ -- 1989 Director Stock Option Plan for the Company, as
amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of
the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1989).
10.6 -- Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 12, 1992,
among Dixie Carriers, Inc., The Variable Annuity Life
Insurance Company, Provident Mutual Life and Annuity
Company of America, among others (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
1992).
10.7+ -- Deferred Compensation Agreement dated August 12, 1985
between Dixie Carriers, Inc., and J. H. Pyne
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1992).
10.8 -- Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 1, 1993, among
Kirby Corporation, AFRAM Carriers, Inc. and AFRAM Lines
(USA) Co., Ltd. and the shareholders of AFRAM Lines (USA)
Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of
the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 3,
1993).
10.9+ -- 1994 Employee Stock Option Plan for Kirby Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1993).
10.10+ -- 1994 Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan for Kirby
Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22
of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1993).
10.11+ -- 1993 Stock Option Plan of Kirby Corporation for Robert G.
Stone, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of
the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1993).
10.12+ -- Amendment to 1989 Director Stock Option Plan for Kirby
Exploration Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.24 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993).
10.13 -- Purchase Agreement, dated November 16, 1994, by and
between The Dow Chemical Company and Dow Hydrocarbons and
Resources, Inc., and Dixie Marine, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1994).
</TABLE>

61
63

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
- ------- ----------------------
<C> <S>
10.14 -- Distribution Agreement, dated December 2, 1994, by and
among Kirby Corporation and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner
& Smith Incorporated, Salomon Brothers Inc, and Wertheim
Schroder & Co. Incorporated (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form
8-K dated December 9, 1994).
10.15+ -- 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan for Kirby Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1996).
10.16+ -- Amendment No. 1 to the 1994 Employee Stock Option Plan
for Kirby Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996).
10.17 -- Credit Agreement, dated September 19, 1997, among Kirby
Corporation, the Banks named therein, and Texas Commerce
Bank National Association as Agent and Funds
Administrator (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.0
of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1997).
10.18 -- First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated January 30,
1998, among Kirby Corporation, the Banks named therein,
and Chase Bank of Texas, N.A. as Agent and Funds
Administrator (incorporated by reference to Exhibit B2 of
the Registrant's Tender Offer Statement on Schedule 13E-4
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 17, 1998).
10.19 -- Asset Purchase Agreement, dated January 28, 1998, by and
between Hvide Marine Incorporated, Sabine Transportation
Company (an Iowa corporation), Kirby Corporation, Sabine
Transportation Company (a Delaware corporation) and Kirby
Tankships, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1
of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
March 25, 1998).
10.20 -- Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated November 30,
1998, among Kirby Corporation, the Banks named therein,
and Chase Bank of Texas, N.A. as Agent and Funds
Administrator.
10.21 -- Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 28, 1999, by and
among Kirby Corporation, Kirby Inland Marine, Inc.,
Hollywood Marine, Inc., C. Berdon Lawrence, and Robert B.
Egan and Eddy J. Rogers, Jr., as Co-Trustees under
certain Berdon Lawrence Trusts (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form
8-K dated July 30, 1999).
10.22 -- Credit Facility, dated as of October 12, 1999, among
Kirby Corporation, the Banks named therein, Chase Bank of
Texas, National Association as Administrative Agent, Bank
of America, N.A. as Syndication Agent, and Bank One,
Texas, N.A. as Documentation Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 1999).
10.23+* -- 2001 Employee Stock Option Plan for Kirby Corporation.
21.1* -- Principal Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1* -- Consent of KPMG LLP.
</TABLE>

- ---------------

* Filed herewith

+ Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.

62
64

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

KIRBY CORPORATION
(Registrant)

By: /s/ NORMAN W. NOLEN
----------------------------------
Norman W. Nolen
Executive Vice President

Dated: March 5, 2001

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SIGNATURE CAPACITY DATE
--------- -------- ----
<C> <S> <C>
/s/ C. BERDON LAWRENCE Chairman of the Board and March 5, 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------- Director of the Company
C. Berdon Lawrence

/s/ J. H. PYNE President, Director of the March 5, 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------- Company and Principal
J. H. Pyne Executive Officer

/s/ NORMAN W. NOLEN Executive Vice President, March 5, 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------- Treasurer, Assistant Secretary
Norman W. Nolen of the Company and Principal
Financial Officer

/s/ G. STEPHEN HOLCOMB Vice President, Controller, March 5, 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------- Assistant Secretary of the
G. Stephen Holcomb Company and Principal
Accounting Officer

/s/ C. SEAN DAY Director of the Company March 5, 2001
- -----------------------------------------------------
C. Sean Day

/s/ BOB G. GOWER Director of the Company March 5, 2001
- -----------------------------------------------------
Bob G. Gower

/s/ WILLIAM M. LAMONT, JR. Director of the Company March 5, 2001
- -----------------------------------------------------
William M. Lamont, Jr.

/s/ GEORGE A. PETERKIN, JR. Director of the Company March 5, 2001
- -----------------------------------------------------
George A. Peterkin, Jr.

/s/ ROBERT G. STONE, JR. Director of the Company March 5, 2001
- -----------------------------------------------------
Robert G. Stone, Jr.

/s/ RICHARD C. WEBB Director of the Company March 5, 2001
- -----------------------------------------------------
Richard C. Webb
</TABLE>

63
65

EXHIBIT INDEX

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
- ------- ----------------------
<C> <S>

3.1 -- Restated Articles of Incorporation of Kirby Exploration
Company, Inc. (the "Company"), as amended (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant's 1989
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Reg. No. 33-30832)).
3.2 -- Certificate of Amendment of Restated Articles of
Incorporation of the Company filed with the Secretary of
State of Nevada April 30, 1990 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990).
3.3 -- Bylaws of the Company, as amended (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2 of the Registrant's July 20, 2000
Registration Statement on Form 8A (Reg. No. 01-07615)).
4.1 -- Indenture, dated as of December 2, 1994, between the
Company and Texas Commerce Bank National Association,
Trustee, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the
Registrant's 1994 Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Reg. No. 33-56195)).
4.2 -- Rights Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2000, between
Kirby Corporation and Fleet National Bank, a national
bank association, which includes the Form of Resolutions
Establishing Designations, Preference and Rights of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Kirby
Corporation, the form of Rights Certificate and the
Summary of Rights (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
July 18, 2000).
10.1+ -- 1982 Stock Option Plan for Kirby Exploration Company, and
forms of option agreements provided for thereunder and
related documents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.5 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1982).
10.2+ -- Amendment to 1982 Stock Option Plan for Kirby Exploration
Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1986).
10.3 -- Indemnification Agreement, dated April 29, 1986, between
the Company and each of its Directors and certain key
employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of
the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1986).
10.4+ -- 1989 Employee Stock Option Plan for the Company, as
amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of
the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1989).
10.5+ -- 1989 Director Stock Option Plan for the Company, as
amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of
the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1989).
10.6 -- Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 12, 1992,
among Dixie Carriers, Inc., The Variable Annuity Life
Insurance Company, Provident Mutual Life and Annuity
Company of America, among others (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
1992).
10.7+ -- Deferred Compensation Agreement dated August 12, 1985
between Dixie Carriers, Inc., and J. H. Pyne
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1992).
</TABLE>
66

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
- ------- ----------------------
<C> <S>
10.8 -- Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 1, 1993, among
Kirby Corporation, AFRAM Carriers, Inc. and AFRAM Lines
(USA) Co., Ltd. and the shareholders of AFRAM Lines (USA)
Co., Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of
the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 3,
1993).
10.9+ -- 1994 Employee Stock Option Plan for Kirby Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1993).
10.10+ -- 1994 Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan for Kirby
Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22
of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1993).
10.11+ -- 1993 Stock Option Plan of Kirby Corporation for Robert G.
Stone, Jr. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of
the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1993).
10.12+ -- Amendment to 1989 Director Stock Option Plan for Kirby
Exploration Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.24 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993).
10.13 -- Purchase Agreement, dated November 16, 1994, by and
between The Dow Chemical Company and Dow Hydrocarbons and
Resources, Inc., and Dixie Marine, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.25 of the Registrant's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1994).
10.14 -- Distribution Agreement, dated December 2, 1994, by and
among Kirby Corporation and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner
& Smith Incorporated, Salomon Brothers Inc, and Wertheim
Schroder & Co. Incorporated (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 1.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form
8-K dated December 9, 1994).
10.15+ -- 1996 Employee Stock Option Plan for Kirby Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1996).
10.16+ -- Amendment No. 1 to the 1994 Employee Stock Option Plan
for Kirby Corporation (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.25 of the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996).
10.17 -- Credit Agreement, dated September 19, 1997, among Kirby
Corporation, the Banks named therein, and Texas Commerce
Bank National Association as Agent and Funds
Administrator (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.0
of the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1997).
10.18 -- First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated January 30,
1998, among Kirby Corporation, the Banks named therein,
and Chase Bank of Texas, N.A. as Agent and Funds
Administrator (incorporated by reference to Exhibit B2 of
the Registrant's Tender Offer Statement on Schedule 13E-4
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 17, 1998).
10.19 -- Asset Purchase Agreement, dated January 28, 1998, by and
between Hvide Marine Incorporated, Sabine Transportation
Company (an Iowa corporation), Kirby Corporation, Sabine
Transportation Company (a Delaware corporation) and Kirby
Tankships, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1
of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
March 25, 1998).
10.20 -- Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated November 30,
1998, among Kirby Corporation, the Banks named therein,
and Chase Bank of Texas, N.A. as Agent and Funds
Administrator.
</TABLE>
67

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT
NO. DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
- ------- ----------------------
<C> <S>
10.21 -- Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 28, 1999, by and
among Kirby Corporation, Kirby Inland Marine, Inc.,
Hollywood Marine, Inc., C. Berdon Lawrence, and Robert B.
Egan and Eddy J. Rogers, Jr., as Co-Trustees under
certain Berdon Lawrence Trusts (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form
8-K dated July 30, 1999).
10.22 -- Credit Facility, dated as of October 12, 1999, among
Kirby Corporation, the Banks named therein, Chase Bank of
Texas, National Association as Administrative Agent, Bank
of America, N.A. as Syndication Agent, and Bank One,
Texas, N.A. as Documentation Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 1999).
10.23+* -- 2001 Employee Stock Option Plan for Kirby Corporation.
21.1* -- Principal Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1* -- Consent of KPMG LLP.
</TABLE>

- ---------------

* Filed herewith

+ Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.