Equity Residential
EQR
#983
Rank
C$34.80 B
Marketcap
C$90.02
Share price
-3.50%
Change (1 day)
0.14%
Change (1 year)
Equity Residential is an American company that owns and manages real estate, especially apartment complexes.

Equity Residential - 10-K annual report


Text size:

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

ý ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended DECEMBER 31, 2005

 

OR

 

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission File Number: 1-12252

 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Maryland

 

13-3675988

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

 

Two North Riverside Plaza, Chicago, Illinois

 

60606

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

 

 

(312) 474-1300

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $0.01 Par Value

 

New York Stock Exchange

(Title of Each Class)

 

(Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered)

 

 

 

Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, $0.01 Par Value

 

New York Stock Exchange

(Title of Each Class)

 

(Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered)

 

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  ý   No o

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý  

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  ý  No  o 

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer  ý   Accelerated filer o    Non-accelerated filer o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No ý

 

The aggregate market value of Common Shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $10.6 billion based upon the closing price on June 30, 2005 of $36.82 using beneficial ownership of shares rules adopted pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to exclude voting shares owned by Trustees and Executive Officers, some of who may not be held to be affiliates upon judicial determination.

 

The number of Common Shares of Beneficial Interest, $0.01 par value, outstanding on February 3, 2006 was 290,425,148.

 

 



 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Part III incorporates by reference certain information to be contained in the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which the Company anticipates will be filed no later than April 14, 2006, and thus these items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction G (3) to Form 10-K.

2



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

PAGE

PART I.

 

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Business

4

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

9

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

26

Item 2.

Properties

27

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

31

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

31

 

 

 

PART II.

 

 

 

 

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

32

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

32

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

34

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

50

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

51

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

51

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

51

Item 9B.

Other Information

52

 

 

 

PART III.

 

 

 

 

 

Item 10.

Trustees and Executive Officers of the Registrant

53

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

53

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

53

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

53

Item 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

53

 

 

 

PART IV.

 

 

 

 

 

Item 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

54

 

3



 

Item 1. Business

 

General

 

Equity Residential (“EQR”), a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in March 1993, is a fully integrated real estate company primarily engaged in the acquisition, development, ownership, management and operation of multifamily properties. In addition, EQR may acquire or develop multifamily properties specifically to convert directly into condominiums as well as upgrade and sell existing properties as individual condominiums. EQR may also acquire land parcels to hold and/or sell based on market opportunities. EQR has elected to be taxed as a REIT.

 

The Company is one of the largest publicly traded real estate companies and is the largest publicly traded owner of multifamily properties (based on the aggregate market value of its outstanding Common Shares, the number of apartment units wholly owned and total revenues earned). The Company’s corporate headquarters are located in Chicago, Illinois and the Company also leases (under operating leases) approximately forty property management offices throughout the United States.

 

EQR is the general partner of, and as of December 31, 2005 owned an approximate 93.4% ownership interest in, ERP Operating Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT (“UPREIT”), under which all property ownership and business operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership and its various subsidiaries. References to the “Company” include EQR, the Operating Partnership and each of the partnerships, limited liability companies and corporations controlled by the Operating Partnership and/or EQR.

 

As of December 31, 2005, the Company, directly or indirectly through investments in title holding entities, owned all or a portion of 926 properties in 31 states and the District of Columbia consisting of 197,404 units. The ownership breakdown includes:

 

 

 

Properties

 

Units

 

Wholly Owned Properties

 

834

 

175,501

 

Partially Owned Properties (Consolidated)

 

35

 

6,004

 

Unconsolidated Properties

 

57

 

15,899

 

 

 

926

 

197,404

 

 

As of March 1, 2006, the Company has approximately 6,000 employees who provide real estate operations, leasing, legal, financial, accounting, acquisition, disposition, development and other support functions.

 

Certain capitalized terms as used herein are defined in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Available Information

 

You may access our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to any of those reports we file with the SEC free of charge at our website, www.equityresidential.com. These reports are made available at our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we file them with the SEC.

 

Business Objectives and Operating Strategies

 

The Company seeks to maximize current income, capital appreciation of each property and the total return for its shareholders.

 

4



 

The Company’s strategy for accomplishing these objectives includes:

 

•                  Leveraging our size and scale in four critical ways:

 

•                  Investing in apartment communities located in strategically targeted markets, to maximize our total return on an enterprise level;

•                  Meeting the needs of our residents by offering a wide array of product choices and a commitment to service;

•                  Engaging, retaining, and attracting the best people by providing them with the education, resources and opportunities to succeed; and

•                  Sharing resources, customers and best practices in property management and across the enterprise.

 

•                  Owning a highly diversified portfolio by investing in target markets defined by a combination of the following criteria:

 

•                  High barrier-to-entry (low supply);

•                  Strong economic predictors (high demand); and

•                  Attractive quality of life (high demand and retention).

 

•                  Giving residents reasons to stay with Equity by providing a range of product options available in our diversified portfolio and by enhancing their experience through our employees and our services.

 

•                  Being open and responsive to market realities to take advantage of investment opportunities that align with our long-term vision.

 

Acquisition, Development and Disposition Strategies

 

The Company anticipates that future property acquisitions and developments will occur within the United States. Acquisitions and developments may be financed from various sources of capital, which may include retained cash flow, issuance of additional equity and debt securities, sales of properties, joint venture agreements and collateralized and uncollateralized borrowings. In addition, the Company may acquire properties in transactions that include the issuance of limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership (“OP Units”) as consideration for the acquired properties. Such transactions may, in certain circumstances, enable the sellers to defer, in whole or in part, the recognition of taxable income or gain, which might otherwise result from the sales.

 

When evaluating potential acquisitions, developments and dispositions, the Company generally considers the following factors:

 

•                  strategically targeted markets;

•                  income levels and employment growth trends in the relevant market;

•                  employment and household growth and net migration of the relevant market’s population;

•                  barriers to entry that would limit competition (zoning laws, building permit availability, supply of undeveloped or developable real estate, local building costs and construction labor costs among other factors);

•                  the location, construction quality, condition and design of the property;

•                  the current and projected cash flow of the property and the ability to increase cash flow;

•                  the potential for capital appreciation of the property;

•                  the terms of resident leases, including the potential for rent increases;

•                  the potential for economic growth and the tax and regulatory environment of the community in which the property is located;

 

5



 

•                  the occupancy and demand by residents for properties of a similar type in the vicinity (the overall market and submarket);

•                  the prospects for liquidity through sale, financing or refinancing of the property;

•                  the benefits of integration into existing operations;

•                  purchase prices and yields of available existing stabilized properties, if any;

•                  competition from existing multifamily properties, residential properties under development and the potential for the construction of new multifamily properties in the area; and

•                  opportunistic selling based on demand and price of high quality assets, including condominium conversions.

 

The Company generally reinvests the proceeds received from property dispositions primarily to achieve its acquisition and development strategies. In addition, when feasible, the Company may structure these transactions as tax deferred exchanges.

 

Debt and Equity Activity

 

The Company’s “Consolidated Debt-to-Total Market Capitalization Ratio” as of December 31, 2005 is presented in the following table. The Company calculates the equity component of its market capitalization as the sum of (i) the total outstanding Common Shares and assumed conversion of all OP Units at the equivalent market value of the closing price of the Company’s Common Shares on the New York Stock Exchange; (ii) the “Common Share Equivalent” of all convertible preferred shares and preference interests/units; and (iii) the liquidation value of all perpetual preferred shares and preference interests outstanding.

 

6



 

Capital Structure as of December 31, 2005

(Amounts in thousands except for share and per share amounts)

 

Secured Debt

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,379,289

 

45

%

 

 

Unsecured Debt

 

 

 

 

 

3,442,784

 

45

%

 

 

Lines of Credit

 

 

 

 

 

769,000

 

10

%

 

 

Total Debt

 

 

 

 

 

$

7,591,073

 

100

%

37

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shares

 

289,536,344

 

93

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

OP Units

 

20,424,245

 

7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Shares & OP Units

 

309,960,589

 

100

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Share Equivalents (see below)

 

1,650,760

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total outstanding at quarter-end

 

311,611,349

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Share Price at December 31, 2005

 

$

39.12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

12,190,236

 

96

%

 

 

Perpetual Preferred Equity (see below)

 

 

 

 

 

515,500

 

4

%

 

 

Total Equity

 

 

 

 

 

$

12,705,736

 

100

%

63

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Market Capitalization

 

 

 

 

 

$

20,296,809

 

 

 

100

%

 

Convertible Preferred Equity as of December 31, 2005

(Amounts in thousands except for share and per share amounts)

 

Series

 

Redemption
Date

 

Outstanding
Shares/Units

 

Liquidation
Value

 

Annual
Dividend
Rate Per
Share/Unit

 

Annual
Dividend
Amount

 

Weighted
Average
Rate

 

Conversion
Ratio

 

Common Share
Equivalents

 

Preferred Shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.00% Series E

 

11/1/98

 

529,096

 

$

13,228

 

$

1.75

 

$

926

 

 

 

1.1128

 

588,778

 

7.00% Series H

 

6/30/98

 

34,734

 

868

 

1.75

 

61

 

 

 

1.4480

 

50,295

 

Preference Interests:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.625% Series H (1)

 

3/23/06

 

190,000

 

9,500

 

3.8125

 

724

 

 

 

1.5108

 

287,052

 

7.625% Series I

 

6/22/06

 

270,000

 

13,500

 

3.8125

 

1,029

 

 

 

1.4542

 

392,634

 

7.625% Series J

 

12/14/06

 

230,000

 

11,500

 

3.8125

 

877

 

 

 

1.4108

 

324,484

 

Junior Preference Units:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.00% Series B

 

7/29/09

 

7,367

 

184

 

2.00

 

15

 

 

 

1.020408

 

7,517

 

Total Convertible Preferred Equity

 

 

 

1,261,197

 

$

48,780

 

 

 

$

3,632

 

7.44

%

 

 

1,650,760

 

 

Perpetual Preferred Equity as of December 31, 2005

(Amounts in thousands except for share and per share amounts)

 

Series

 

Redemption
Date

 

Outstanding
Shares/Units

 

Liquidation
Value

 

Annual
Dividend
Rate Per
Share/Unit

 

Annual
Dividend
Amount

 

Weighted
Average
Rate

 

Preferred Shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9 1/8% Series C

 

9/9/06

 

460,000

 

$

115,000

 

$

22.8125

 

$

10,494

 

 

 

8.60% Series D

 

7/15/07

 

700,000

 

175,000

 

21.50

 

15,050

 

 

 

8.29% Series K

 

12/10/26

 

1,000,000

 

50,000

 

4.145

 

4,145

 

 

 

6.48% Series N

 

6/19/08

 

600,000

 

150,000

 

16.20

 

9,720

 

 

 

Preference Interests:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.875% Series G (1)

 

3/21/06

 

510,000

 

25,500

 

3.9375

 

2,008

 

 

 

Total Perpetual Preferred Equity

 

 

 

3,270,000

 

$

515,500

 

 

 

$

41,417

 

8.03

%

 


(1)                        The Series G and H Preference Interests were called for redemption on February 10, 2006, to be effective March 21, 2006 and March 23, 2006, respectively. See Note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional discussion.

 

Debt and Equity Offerings For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

 

During 2005, the Company:

 

•                  The Operating Partnership issued $500.0 million of ten and one-half year 5.125% unsecured fixed rate notes (the “March 2016 Notes”) in a public debt offering in September 2005. The March 2016

 

7



 

Notes were issued at a discount, which is being amortized over the life of the notes on a straight-line basis. The March 2016 Notes are due March 15, 2016 with interest payable semiannually in arrears on March 15 and September 15, commencing March 15, 2006. The Operating Partnership received net proceeds of approximately $496.2 million in connection with this issuance.

•                  Issued 2,248,744 Common Shares pursuant to its Share Incentive Plans and received net proceeds of approximately $54.9 million.

•                  Issued 286,751 Common Shares pursuant to its Employee Share Purchase Plan and received net proceeds of approximately $8.3 million.

 

During 2004, the Company:

 

•                  The Operating Partnership issued $300.0 million of five-year 4.75% unsecured fixed rate notes (the “June 2009 Notes”) in a public debt offering in June 2004. The June 2009 Notes were issued at a discount, which is being amortized over the life of the notes on a straight-line basis. The June 2009 Notes are due June 15, 2009 with interest payable semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December 1, commencing December 1, 2004. The Operating Partnership received net proceeds of approximately $296.8 million in connection with this issuance.

•                  The Operating Partnership issued $500.0 million of ten-year 5.25% unsecured fixed rate notes (the “September 2014 Notes”) in a public debt offering in September 2004. The September 2014 Notes were issued at a discount, which is being amortized over the life of the notes on a straight-line basis. The September 2014 Notes are due September 15, 2014 with interest payable semiannually in arrears on September 1 and March 1, commencing March 1, 2005. The Operating Partnership received net proceeds of approximately $496.1 million in connection with this issuance.

•                  The Operating Partnership received $100.0 million as an initial draw on a $300.0 million floating rate loan in July 2004. The loan was paid off in full and terminated in September 2004.

•                  Issued 3,350,759 Common Shares pursuant to its Share Incentive Plans and received net proceeds of approximately $79.0 million.

•                  Issued 275,616 Common Shares pursuant to its Employee Share Purchase Plan and received net proceeds of approximately $6.9 million.

 

During 2003, the Company:

 

•                  The Operating Partnership issued $400.0 million of ten-year 5.20% unsecured fixed rate notes (the “April 2013 Notes”) in a public debt offering in March 2003. The April 2013 Notes were issued at a discount, which is being amortized over the life of the notes on a straight-line basis. The April 2013 Notes are due April 1, 2013 with interest payable semiannually in arrears on April 1 and October 1, commencing October 1, 2003. The Operating Partnership received net proceeds of approximately $397.5 million in connection with this issuance.

•                  Issued 600,000 Series N Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares with a liquidation value of $150.0 million and received net proceeds of approximately $145.3 million.

•                  Issued 3,249,555 Common Shares pursuant to its Share Incentive Plans and received net proceeds of approximately $68.4 million.

•                  Issued 289,274 Common Shares pursuant to its Employee Share Purchase Plan and received net proceeds of approximately $6.3 million.

 

As of March 1, 2006, $580.0 million in debt securities remains available for issuance by the Operating Partnership under a registration statement the SEC declared effective in June 2003 and $956.5 million in equity securities remains available for issuance by the Company under a registration statement the SEC declared effective in February 1998.

 

8



 

In May 2002, the Company’s shareholders approved the Company’s 2002 Share Incentive Plan. In January 2003, the Company filed a Form S-8 registration statement to register 23,125,828 Common Shares under this plan. As of January 1, 2006, 23,370,851 shares are available for issuance under this plan.

 

Cumulative through December 31, 2005, the Company, through a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership, issued and has outstanding various series of Preference Interests (the “Preference Interests”) with an equity value of $60.0 million receiving net proceeds of $58.5 million.

 

Credit Facilities

 

On April 1, 2005, the Operating Partnership obtained a new three-year $1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility maturing on May 29, 2008, and terminated the $700.0 million credit facility that was scheduled to expire on May 29, 2005. The Operating Partnership has the ability to increase available borrowings up to $500.0 million under certain circumstances. Advances under the new credit facility bear interest at variable rates based upon LIBOR at various interest periods plus a spread dependent upon the Operating Partnership’s credit rating or based on bids received from the lending group. EQR has guaranteed the Operating Partnership’s credit facility up to the maximum amount and for the full term of the facility.

 

On August 30, 2005, the Operating Partnership obtained a new one-year $600.0 million revolving credit facility maturing on August 29, 2006. EQR had guaranteed this credit facility up to the maximum amount and for its full term. The Operating Partnership terminated this short-term revolving credit facility on January 20, 2006.

 

As of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, $769.0 million and $150.0 million, respectively, was outstanding and $50.2 million and $65.4 million, respectively, was restricted (dedicated to support letters of credit and not available for borrowing) on the credit facilities. During the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the lines of credit were 3.80% and 1.73%, respectively.

 

Competition

 

All of the Company’s properties are located in developed areas that include other multifamily properties. The number of competitive multifamily properties in a particular area could have a material effect on the Company’s ability to lease units at the properties or at any newly acquired properties and on the rents charged. The Company may be competing with other entities that have greater resources than the Company and whose managers have more experience than the Company’s managers. In addition, other forms of rental properties and single-family housing provide housing alternatives to potential residents of multifamily properties. See Item 1A Risk Factors for additional information with respect to competition.

 

Environmental Considerations

 

See Item 1A Risk Factors for information concerning the potential effects of environmental regulations on our operations.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

General

 

The following Risk Factors may contain defined terms that are different from those used in the other sections of this report. Unless otherwise indicated, when used in this section, the terms “we” and “us” refer to Equity Residential and its subsidiaries, including ERP Operating Limited Partnership.

 

9



 

The occurrence of the events discussed in the following risk factors could adversely affect, possibly in a material manner, our business, financial condition or results of operations, which could adversely affect the value of our common shares of beneficial interest or preferred shares of beneficial interest (which we refer to collectively as “Shares”); preference interests (“Interests”) of a subsidiary of ERP Operating Limited Partnership, our operating partnership. In this section, we refer to the Shares, Interests, Units and the OP Units together as our “securities”, and the investors who own Shares, Interests, Units and/or OP Units as our “security holders”.

 

Our Performance and Securities Value are Subject to Risks Associated with the Real Estate Industry
 
General
 

Real property investments are subject to varying degrees of risk and are relatively illiquid. Several factors may adversely affect the economic performance and value of our properties. These factors include changes in the national, regional and local economic climates, local conditions such as an oversupply of multifamily properties or a reduction in demand for our multifamily properties, the attractiveness of our properties to residents, competition from other available multifamily property owners and changes in market rental rates. Our performance also depends on our ability to collect rent from residents and to pay for adequate maintenance, insurance and other operating costs, including real estate taxes, which could increase over time. Also, the expenses of owning and operating a property are not necessarily reduced when circumstances such as market factors and competition cause a reduction in income from the property.

 

We May be Unable to Renew Leases or Relet Units as Leases Expire

 

When our residents decide not to renew their leases upon expiration, we may not be able to relet their units. Even if the residents do renew or we can relet the units, the terms of renewal or reletting may be less favorable than current lease terms. Because virtually all of our leases are for apartments, they are generally for terms of no more than one year. If we are unable to promptly renew the leases or relet the units, or if the rental rates upon renewal or reletting are significantly lower than expected rates, then our results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected. Consequently, our cash flow and ability to service debt and make distributions to security holders would be reduced.

 

New Acquisitions, Developments and/or Condominium Conversion Projects May Fail to Perform as Expected and Competition for Acquisitions May Result in Increased Prices for Properties

 

We intend to actively acquire and develop multifamily properties for rental operations and/or specifically to convert directly into condominiums as well as upgrade and sell existing properties as individual condominiums. We may underestimate the costs necessary to bring an acquired or condominium conversion property up to standards established for its intended market position or to develop a property. Additionally, we expect that other major real estate investors with significant capital will compete with us for attractive investment opportunities or may also develop properties in markets where we focus our development efforts. This competition may increase prices for multifamily properties or decrease the price we expect to sell individual condominiums. We may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to make suitable property acquisitions on favorable terms.  We also plan to develop more properties ourselves in addition to co-investing with our development partners for either the rental or condominium market, depending on opportunities in each sub-market. This may increase the overall level of risk associated with developments. The total number of development units, cost of development and estimated completion dates are subject to uncertainties arising from changing economic conditions (such as the cost of labor and construction materials), competition and local government regulation.

 

10



 

Because Real Estate Investments Are Illiquid, We May Not Be Able To Sell Properties When Appropriate

 

Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly. We may not be able to change our portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions. This inability to respond promptly to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our financial condition and ability to make distributions to our security holders.

 

Changes in Laws and Litigation Risk Could Affect Our Business

 

We are generally not able to pass through to our residents under existing leases real estate or other federal, state or local taxes. Consequently, any such tax increases may adversely affect our financial condition and limit our ability to make distributions to our security holders. Similarly, changes that increase our potential liability under environmental laws or our expenditures on environmental compliance would adversely affect our cash flow and ability to make distributions on our securities.

 

As the largest publicly traded owner of multifamily properties, we may become involved in legal proceedings, including but not limited to, proceedings related to consumer, employment, tort and commercial legal issues, that if decided adversely to or settled by us, could result in liability material to our financial condition or results of operations.

 

Environmental Problems are Possible and can be Costly

 

Federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment may require a current or previous owner or operator of real estate to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum product releases at such property. The owner or operator may have to pay a governmental entity or third parties for property damage and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination. These laws typically impose clean-up responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from that site.

 

Substantially all of our properties have been the subject of environmental assessments completed by qualified independent environmental consultant companies. These environmental assessments have not revealed, nor are we aware of, any environmental liability that our management believes would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

 

Over the past four years, there have been an increasing number of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties other than the Company alleging personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold in residential real estate. Some of these lawsuits have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements. Insurance carriers have reacted to these liability awards by excluding mold related claims from standard policies and pricing mold endorsements at prohibitively high rates. We have adopted programs designed to minimize the existence of mold in any of our properties as well as guidelines for promptly addressing and resolving reports of mold to minimize any impact mold might have on residents or the property.

 

We cannot be assured that existing environmental assessments of our properties reveal all environmental liabilities, that any prior owner of any of our properties did not create a material environmental condition not known to us, or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any one or more of our properties.

 

11



 

Insurance Policy Deductibles and Exclusions

 

In order to partially mitigate the substantial increase in insurance costs in recent years, management has determined to gradually increase deductible and self-insured retention amounts. As of December 31, 2005, the Company’s property insurance policy (for Wholly Owned Properties) provides for a per occurrence deductible of $250,000 and self-insured retention of $5.0 million per occurrence, subject to a maximum annual aggregate self-insured retention of $7.5 million, with any excess losses being covered by insurance. Any earthquake and named windstorm losses are subject to a deductible of 2% (5% for California earthquakes) of the values of the buildings involved in the losses and are not subject to the aggregate self-insured retention. The Company’s liability and worker’s compensation policies at December 31, 2005, provide for a $1.0 million per occurrence deductible. These higher deductible and self-insured retention amounts do expose the Company to greater potential uninsured losses, such as the property damage caused by hurricanes and other natural disasters, but management believes the savings in insurance premium expense justifies this increased exposure over the long-term.

 

As a result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, property insurance carriers have created exclusions for losses from terrorism from our “all risk” property insurance policies. While separate terrorism insurance coverage is available in certain instances, premiums for such coverage are generally very expensive and deductibles are very high. Additionally, the terrorism insurance coverage that is available typically excludes coverage for losses from nuclear, biological and chemical attacks. At the present time, the Company has determined that it is not economically prudent to obtain property terrorism insurance for its entire portfolio to the extent otherwise available, especially given the significant risks that are not covered by such insurance. As of December 31, 2005, the Company’s high-rise properties were insured for $300 million in terrorism insurance coverage, with a $2.5 million deductible. In the event of a terrorist attack impacting one or more of the properties, we could lose the revenues from the property, our capital investment in the property and possibly face liability claims from residents or others suffering injuries or losses. The Company believes, however, that the number and geographic diversity of its portfolio and its high-rise terrorism insurance coverage help to mitigate its exposure to the risks associated with potential terrorist attacks.

 

Debt Financing, Preferred Shares and Preference Interests and Units Could Adversely Affect Our Performance
 

General

 

The Company’s total debt summary, as of December 31, 2005, included:
 

12



 

 

Debt Summary

 

 

 

$ Millions (1)

 

Weighted
Average Rate (1)

 

Secured

 

$

3,379

 

5.63

%

Unsecured

 

4,212

 

5.89

%

Total

 

$

7,591

 

5.76

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Rate

 

$

5,700

 

6.32

%

Floating Rate

 

1,891

 

3.75

%

Total

 

$

7,591

 

5.76

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Above Totals Include:

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Exempt:

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed

 

$

135

 

4.02

%

Floating

 

629

 

2.95

%

Total

 

$

764

 

3.25

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unsecured Revolving Credit Facilities

 

$

769

 

3.80

%

 


(1) Net of the effect of any derivative instruments.

 

In addition to debt, we have $564.3 million of combined liquidation value of outstanding preferred shares of beneficial interest and preference interests and units, with a weighted average dividend preference of 7.98% per annum, as of December 31, 2005. Our use of debt and preferred equity financing creates certain risks, including the following:

 

Scheduled Debt Payments Could Adversely Affect Our Financial Condition

 

In the future, our cash flow could be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest or to pay distributions on our securities at expected levels.

 

We may not be able to refinance existing debt (which in virtually all cases requires substantial principal payments at maturity) and, if we can, the terms of such refinancing might not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness. If principal payments due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended or paid with proceeds of other capital transactions, such as new equity capital, our cash flow will not be sufficient in all years to repay all maturing debt. As a result, we may be forced to postpone capital expenditures necessary for the maintenance of our properties and may have to dispose of one or more properties on terms that would otherwise be unacceptable to us. The Company’s debt maturity schedule as of December 31, 2005 is as follows:

 

13



 

 

 

Debt Maturity Schedule

 

Year

 

$ Millions

 

% of Total

 

2006 (1)

 

$

774

 

10.2

%

2007

 

389

 

5.1

%

2008 (2)

 

1,175

 

15.5

%

2009

 

862

 

11.4

%

2010

 

264

 

3.5

%

2011

 

805

 

10.6

%

2012

 

537

 

7.1

%

2013

 

568

 

7.5

%

2014

 

505

 

6.6

%

2015+

 

1,712

 

22.5

%

Total

 

$

7,591

 

100.0

%

 


(1) Includes $150.0 million of 7.57% unsecured debt with a final maturity of 2026 that is putable in 2006. Also includes $215.0 million outstanding on the Company’s short-term $600.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. This facility was terminated on January 20, 2006 in conjunction with the Company’s $400.0 million unsecured note issuance which closed on January 19, 2006.

 

(2) Includes $554.0 million outstanding on the Company’s long-term unsecured revolving credit facility, which matures on May 29, 2008.

 

Financial Covenants Could Adversely Affect the Company’s Financial Condition

 

If a property we own is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet the mortgage payments, the holder of the mortgage could foreclose on the property, resulting in loss of income and asset value. Foreclosure on mortgaged properties or an inability to refinance existing indebtedness would likely have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

The mortgages on our properties may contain negative covenants that, among other things, limit our ability, without the prior consent of the lender, to further mortgage the property and to reduce or change insurance coverage. In addition, our unsecured credit facilities contain certain restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness. The indentures under which a substantial portion of our debt was issued also contain certain financial and operating covenants including, among other things, maintenance of certain financial ratios, as well as limitations on our ability to incur secured and unsecured indebtedness (including acquisition financing), and to sell all or substantially all of our assets. Our credit facilities and indentures are cross-defaulted and also contain cross default provisions with other material indebtedness. Our most restrictive unsecured public debt covenants as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, are (terms are defined in the indentures):

 

14



 

 

 

Selected Unsecured Public Debt Covenants

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

Total Debt to Adjusted Total Assets (not to exceed 60%)

 

44.9

%

42.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured Debt to Adjusted Total Assets (not to exceed 40%)

 

20.0

%

20.8

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Income Available For Debt Service To

 

 

 

 

 

Maximum Annual Service Charges (must be at least 1.5 to 1)

 

2.84

 

2.97

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Unsecured Assets to Unsecured Debt (must be at least 150%)

 

261.4

%

278.1

%

 

Some of the properties were financed with tax-exempt bonds that contain certain restrictive covenants or deed restrictions. We have retained an independent outside consultant to monitor compliance with the restrictive covenants and deed restrictions that affect these properties. If these bond compliance requirements restrict our ability to increase our rental rates to attract low or moderate-income residents, or eligible/qualified residents, then our income from these properties may be limited.

 

Our Degree of Leverage Could Limit Our Ability to Obtain Additional Financing

 

Our Consolidated Debt-to-Total Market Capitalization Ratio was 37% as of December 31, 2005. Our degree of leverage could have important consequences to security holders. For example, the degree of leverage could affect our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, development or other general corporate purposes, making us more vulnerable to a downturn in business or the economy in general.

 

Rising Interest Rates Could Adversely Affect Cash Flow

 

Advances under our credit facilities bear interest at variable rates based upon LIBOR at various interest periods, plus a spread dependent upon the Operating Partnership’s credit rating, or based upon bids received from the lending group. Certain public issuances of our senior unsecured debt instruments may also, from time to time, bear interest at floating rates. We may also borrow additional money with variable interest rates in the future. Increases in interest rates would increase our interest expenses under these debt instruments and would increase the costs of refinancing existing indebtedness and of issuing new debt. Accordingly, higher interest rates could adversely affect cash flow and our ability to service our debt and to make distributions to security holders. We use interest rate hedging arrangements to manage our exposure to interest rate volatility, but these arrangements may expose us to additional risks, and no strategy can completely insulate us from risks associated with interest rate fluctuations. There can be no assurance that our hedging arrangements will have the desired beneficial impact and may involve costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs, if we terminate them.

 

We Depend on Our Key Personnel

 

We depend on the efforts of the Chairman of our Board of Trustees, Samuel Zell, and our executive officers, particularly David J. Neithercut, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Gerald A. Spector, our Chief Operating Officer. If they resign, our operations could be temporarily adversely affected. Mr. Zell has entered into executive compensation and retirement benefit agreements with the Company. Mr. Spector has entered into a Deferred Compensation Agreement with the Company that under certain conditions could provide him with a salary benefit after his termination of employment with the Company. In addition, Mr. Zell and Mr. Spector have entered into Noncompetition Agreements with the Company.

 

15



 

In the event the Chairman of the Board and/or the CEO are unable to serve, (i) the Lead Trustee shall automatically be appointed to serve as the interim successor to the Chairman, (ii) the Chairman shall automatically be appointed to serve as the interim successor to the CEO and (iii) the Chair of the Compensation Committee of the Board will immediately call a meeting of the Committee to recommend to the full Board the selection of a permanent replacement for either or both positions, as necessary.

 

Control and Influence by Significant Shareholders Could be Exercised in a Manner Adverse to Other Shareholders

 

As of December 31, 2005, Samuel Zell, our Chairman of the Board, certain affiliates of Mr. Zell, and certain of our executive officers and trustees, owned (or could potentially acquire upon the exchange of OP Units held by certain of such parties) a number of our common shares. In addition, the consent of certain affiliates of Mr. Zell is required for certain amendments to the Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of ERP Operating Limited Partnership (the “Partnership Agreement”). As a result of their security ownership and rights concerning amendments to the Partnership Agreement, the security holders referred to herein may have influence over the Company. Although these security holders have not agreed to act together on any matter, they would be in a position to exercise even more influence over the Company’s affairs if they were to act together in the future. This influence could conceivably be exercised in a manner that is inconsistent with the interests of other security holders. For additional information regarding the security ownership of our trustees, including Mr. Zell, and our executive officers, see the Company’s definitive proxy statement.

 

Shareholders’ Ability to Effect Changes in Control of the Company is Limited

 

Provisions of Our Declaration of Trust and Bylaws Could Inhibit Changes in Control

 

Certain provisions of our Declaration of Trust and Bylaws may delay or prevent a change in control of the Company or other transactions that could provide the security holders with a premium over the then-prevailing market price of their securities or which might otherwise be in the best interest of our security holders. This includes the 5% Ownership Limit described below. Also, any future series of preferred shares of beneficial interest may have certain voting provisions that could delay or prevent a change of control or other transactions that might otherwise be in the interest of our security holders.

 

We Have a Share Ownership Limit for REIT Tax Purposes

 

To remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding Shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals at any time during the last half of any year. To facilitate maintenance of our REIT qualification, our Declaration of Trust, subject to certain exceptions, prohibits ownership by any single shareholder of more than 5% of the lesser of the number or value of the outstanding class of common or preferred shares. We refer to this restriction as the “Ownership Limit.”  Absent any exemption or waiver granted by our Board of Trustees, securities acquired or held in violation of the Ownership Limit will be transferred to a trust for the exclusive benefit of a designated charitable beneficiary, and the security holder’s rights to distributions and to vote would terminate. A transfer of Shares may be void if it causes a person to violate the Ownership Limit. The Ownership Limit could delay or prevent a change in control and, therefore, could adversely affect our security holders’ ability to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price for their Shares. To reduce the ability of the Board to use the Ownership Limit as an anti-takeover device, in 2004 the Company amended the Ownership Limit to require, rather than permit, the Board to grant a waiver of the Ownership Limit if the individual seeking a waiver demonstrates that such ownership would not jeopardize the Company’s status as a REIT.

 

16



 

Our Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest May Affect Changes in Control

 

Our Declaration of Trust authorizes the Board of Trustees to issue up to 100 million preferred shares of beneficial interest, and to establish the preferences and rights (including the right to vote and the right to convert into common shares) of any preferred shares issued. The Board of Trustees may use its powers to issue preferred shares and to set the terms of such securities to delay or prevent a change in control of the Company, even if a change in control were in the interest of security holders.

 

Inapplicability of Maryland Law Limiting Certain Changes in Control

 

Certain provisions of Maryland law applicable to real estate investment trusts prohibit “business combinations” (including certain issuances of equity securities) with any person who beneficially owns ten percent or more of the voting power of outstanding securities, or with an affiliate who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of ten percent or more of the voting power of the trust’s outstanding voting securities (an “Interested Shareholder”), or with an affiliate of an Interested Shareholder. These prohibitions last for five years after the most recent date on which the Interested Shareholder became an Interested Shareholder. After the five-year period, a business combination with an Interested Shareholder must be approved by two super-majority shareholder votes unless, among other conditions, holders of common shares receive a minimum price for their shares and the consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the Interested Shareholder for its common shares. As permitted by Maryland law, however, the Board of Trustees of the Company has opted out of these restrictions with respect to any business combination involving Mr. Zell and certain of his affiliates and persons acting in concert with them. Consequently, the five-year prohibition and the super-majority vote requirements will not apply to a business combination involving us and/or any of them. Such business combinations may not be in the best interest of our security holders.

 

Our Success as a REIT is Dependent on Compliance with Federal Income Tax Requirements

 

Our Failure to Qualify as a REIT Would Have Serious Adverse Consequences to Our Security Holders

 

We believe that we have qualified for taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes since our taxable year ended December 31, 1992 based, in part, upon opinions of tax counsel received whenever we have issued equity securities or engaged in significant merger transactions. We plan to continue to meet the requirements for taxation as a REIT. Many of these requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. We cannot, therefore, guarantee that we have qualified or will qualify in the future as a REIT. The determination that we are a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters that may not be totally within our control. For example, to qualify as a REIT, our gross income must generally come from rental and other real estate or passive related sources that are itemized in the REIT tax laws. We are also required to distribute to security holders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income excluding capital gains. The fact that we hold our assets through ERP Operating Limited Partnership and its subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT status. Furthermore, Congress and the IRS might make changes to the tax laws and regulations, and the courts might issue new rulings that make it more difficult, or impossible, for us to remain qualified as a REIT. We do not believe, however, that any pending or proposed tax law changes would jeopardize our REIT status.

 

If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. Also, unless the IRS granted us relief under certain statutory provisions, we would remain disqualified as a REIT for four years following the year we first failed to qualify. If we fail to qualify as a REIT, we would have to pay significant income taxes. We, therefore, would have less money available for investments or for distributions to security holders. This would likely have a significant adverse affect on the value of our securities. In addition, we would no longer be required to make any distributions to security holders. Even if we quality as a REIT, we are and will continue to be subject to certain federal,

 

17



 

state and local taxes on our income and property. In addition, our third party management operations, corporate housing business and condominium conversion business, which are conducted through taxable REIT subsidiaries, generally will be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates.

 

We could be Disqualified as a REIT or Have to Pay Taxes if Our Merger Partners Did Not Qualify as REITs

 

If any of our prior merger partners had failed to qualify as a REIT throughout the duration of their existence, then they might have had undistributed “C corporation earnings and profits” at the time of their merger with us. If that was the case and we did not distribute those earnings and profits prior to the end of the year in which the merger took place, we might not qualify as a REIT. We believe based, in part, upon opinions of legal counsel received pursuant to the terms of our merger agreements as well as our own investigations, among other things, that each of our prior merger partners qualified as a REIT and that, in any event, none of them had any undistributed “C corporation earnings and profits” at the time of their merger with us. If any of our prior merger partners failed to qualify as a REIT, an additional concern would be that they would have recognized taxable gain at the time they were merged with us. We would be liable for the tax on such gain. In this event, we would have to pay corporate income tax on any gain existing at the time of the applicable merger on assets acquired in the merger if the assets are sold within ten years of the merger. Finally, we could be precluded from electing REIT status for up to four years after the year in which the predecessor entity failed to qualify for REIT status.

 

Compliance with REIT Distribution Requirements May Affect Our Financial Condition

 

Distribution Requirements May Increase the Indebtedness of the Company

 

We may be required from time to time, under certain circumstances, to accrue as income for tax purposes interest and rent earned but not yet received. In such event, or upon our repayment of principal on debt, we could have taxable income without sufficient cash to enable us to meet the distribution requirements of a REIT. Accordingly, we could be required to borrow funds or liquidate investments on adverse terms in order to meet these distribution requirements.

 

Federal Income Tax Considerations

 

General

 

The following discussion summarizes the federal income tax considerations material to a holder of common shares. It is not exhaustive of all possible tax considerations. For example, it does not give a detailed discussion of any state, local or foreign tax considerations. The following discussion also does not address all tax matters that may be relevant to prospective shareholders in light of their particular circumstances. Moreover, it does not address all tax matters that may be relevant to shareholders who are subject to special treatment under the tax laws, such as insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, financial institutions or broker-dealers, foreign corporations and persons who are not citizens or residents of the United States.

 

The specific tax attributes of a particular shareholder could have a material impact on the tax considerations associated with the purchase, ownership and disposition of common shares. Therefore, it is essential that each prospective shareholder consult with his or her own tax advisors with regard to the application of the federal income tax laws to the shareholder’s personal tax situation, as well as any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign taxing jurisdiction.

 

The information in this section is based on the current Internal Revenue Code, current, temporary and proposed Treasury regulations, the legislative history of the Internal Revenue Code, current administrative interpretations and practices of the Internal Revenue Service, including its practices and policies as set forth in private letter rulings, which are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service, and

 

18



 

existing court decisions. Future legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations and court decisions could change current law or adversely affect existing interpretations of current law. Any change could apply retroactively. Thus, it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service could challenge the statements in this discussion, which do not bind the Internal Revenue Service or the courts, and that a court could agree with the Internal Revenue Service.

 

Our Taxation

 

We elected REIT status beginning with the year that ended December 31, 1992. In any year in which we qualify as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of our REIT taxable income or capital gain that we distribute to our shareholders. This treatment substantially eliminates the double taxation that applies to most corporations, which pay a tax on their income and then distribute dividends to shareholders who are in turn taxed on the amount they receive. We elected taxable REIT subsidiary status for certain of our corporate subsidiaries, primarily those engaged in condominium conversion and sale activities. As a result, we will be subject to federal income taxes for activities performed by our taxable REIT subsidiaries.

 

We will be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates upon our REIT taxable income or capital gain that we do not distribute to our shareholders. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% excise tax if we do not satisfy specific REIT distribution requirements. We could also be subject to the “alternative minimum tax” on our items of tax preference. In addition, any net income from “prohibited transactions” (i.e., dispositions of property, other than property held by a taxable REIT subsidiary, held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business) will be subject to a 100% tax. We could also be subject to a 100% penalty tax on certain payments received from or on certain expenses deducted by a taxable REIT subsidiary if any such transaction is not respected by the Internal Revenue Service. If we fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test (described below) but have maintained our qualification as a REIT because we satisfied certain other requirements, we will still generally be subject to a 100% penalty tax on the amount by which we fail such gross income test. If we fail to satisfy any of the REIT asset tests (described below) by more than a de minimis amount, due to reasonable cause, and we nonetheless maintain our REIT qualification because of specified cure provisions, we will be required to pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the non-qualifying assets. If we fail to satisfy any provision of the Internal Revenue Code that would result in our failure to qualify as a REIT (other than a violation of the REIT gross income or asset tests described below) and the violation is due to reasonable cause, we may retain our REIT qualification but we will be required to pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such failure. Moreover, we may be subject to taxes in certain situations and on certain transactions that we do not presently contemplate.

 

We believe that we have qualified as a REIT for all of our taxable years beginning with 1992. We also believe that our current structure and method of operation is such that we will continue to qualify as a REIT. However, given the complexity of the REIT qualification requirements, we cannot provide any assurance that the actual results of our operations have satisfied or will satisfy the requirements under the Internal Revenue Code for a particular year.

 

If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year and the relief provisions described herein do not apply, we will be subject to tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. We also may be subject to the corporate “alternative minimum tax.” As a result, our failure to qualify as a REIT would significantly reduce the cash we have available to distribute to our shareholders. Unless entitled to statutory relief, we would be disqualified as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. It is not possible to state whether we would be entitled to statutory relief.

 

Our qualification and taxation as a REIT depend on our ability to satisfy various requirements

 

19



 

under the Internal Revenue Code. We are required to satisfy these requirements on a continuing basis through actual annual operating and other results. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to operate in a manner so as to remain qualified as a REIT.

 

Ownership of Taxable REIT Subsidiaries By Us. The Internal Revenue Code provides that for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000, REITs may own greater than ten percent of the voting power and value of the securities of “taxable REIT subsidiaries” or “TRSs”, which are corporations subject to tax as a regular “C” corporation that have elected, jointly with a REIT, to be a TRS. Generally, a taxable REIT subsidiary may own assets that cannot otherwise be owned by a REIT and can perform impermissible tenant services (discussed above), which would otherwise taint our rental income under the REIT income tests. However, the REIT will be obligated to pay a 100% penalty tax on some payments that we receive or on certain expenses deducted by our TRSs if the economic arrangements between us, our tenants and the TRS are not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties. A TRS may also receive income from prohibited transactions without incurring the 100% federal income tax liability imposed to REITs. Income from prohibited transactions may include the purchase and sale of land, the purchase and sale of completed development properties and the sale of condominium units.

 

TRSs pay federal and state income tax at the full applicable corporate rates. The amount of taxes paid on impermissible tenant services income and the sale of real estate held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business may be material in amount. The TRSs will attempt to minimize the amount of these taxes, but we cannot guarantee whether or the extent to which, measures taken to minimize these taxes will be successful. To the extent that these companies are required to pay taxes, less cash may be available for distributions to shareholders.

 

Share Ownership Test and Organizational Requirement. In order to qualify as a REIT, our shares of beneficial interest must be held by a minimum of 100 persons for at least 335 days of a taxable year that is 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. Also, not more than 50% in value of our shares of beneficial interest may be owned directly or indirectly by applying certain constructive ownership rules, by five or fewer individuals during the last half of each taxable year. In addition, we must meet certain other organizational requirements, including, but not limited to, that (i) the beneficial ownership in us is evidenced by transferable shares and (ii) we are managed by one or more trustees. We believe that we have satisfied all of these tests and all other organizational requirements and that we will continue to do so in the future. In order to ensure compliance with the 100 person test and the 50% share ownership test discussed above, we have placed certain restrictions on the transfer of our shares that are intended to prevent further concentration of share ownership. However, such restrictions may not prevent us from failing these requirements, and thereby failing to qualify as a REIT.

 

Gross Income Tests. To qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy two gross income tests:

 

(1)          At least 75% of our gross income for each taxable year must be derived directly or indirectly from rents from real property, investments in real estate and/or real estate mortgages, dividends paid by another REIT and from some types of temporary investments.

(2)          At least 95% of our gross income for each taxable year must be derived from any combination of income qualifying under the 75% test and dividends, non-real estate mortgage interest, some payments under hedging instruments and gain from the sale or disposition of stock or securities.

 

To qualify as rents from real property for the purpose of satisfying the gross income tests, rental payments must generally be received from unrelated persons and not be based on the net income of the resident. Also, the rent attributable to personal property must not exceed 15% of the total rent. We may generally provide services to residents without “tainting” our rental income only if such services are “usually or customarily rendered” in connection with the rental of real property and not otherwise considered “impermissible services”. If such services are impermissible, then we may generally provide them only if they are considered de minimis in amount, or are provided through an independent contractor

 

20



 

from whom we derive no revenue and that meets other requirements, or through a taxable REIT subsidiary. We believe that services provided to residents by us either are usually or customarily rendered in connection with the rental of real property and not otherwise considered impermissible, or, if considered impermissible services, will meet the de minimis test or will be provided by an independent contractor or taxable REIT subsidiary. However, we cannot provide any assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will agree with these positions.

 

If we fail to satisfy one or both of the gross income tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for the year if we are entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. In this case, a penalty tax would still be applicable as discussed above. Generally, it is not possible to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions and in the event these relief provisions do not apply, we will not qualify as a REIT.

 

Asset Tests. In general, at the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we must satisfy four tests relating to the nature of our assets:

 

(1)                At least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by real estate assets (which include for this purpose shares in other real estate investment trusts) and certain cash related items;

(2)                Not more than 25% of our total assets may be represented by securities other than those in the 75% asset class;

(3)                Except for equity investments in other REITs, qualified REIT subsidiaries (i.e., corporations owned 100% by a REIT that are not TRSs or REITs), or taxable REIT subsidiaries: (a) the value of any one issuer’s securities owned by us may not exceed 5% of the value of our total assets and (b) we may not own more than 10% of the value of or the voting securities of any one issuer; and

(4)                Not more than 20% of our total assets may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries.

 

                The 10% value test described in clause (b) of (3) above does not apply to certain securities that fall within a safe harbor under the Code. Under the safe harbor, the following are not considered "securities" held by us for purposes of this 10% value test: (i) straight debt securities, (ii) any loan of an individual or an estate, (iii) certain rental agreements for the use of tangible property, (iv) any obligation to pay rents from real property, (v) any security issued by a state or any political subdivision thereof, foreign government or Puerto Rico only if the determination of any payment under such security is not based on the profits of another entity or payments on any obligation issued by such other entity, or (vi) any security issued by a REIT. The timing and payment of interest or principal on a security qualifying as straight debt may be subject to a contingency provided that (A) such contingency does not change the effective yield to maturity, not considering a de minimis change which does not exceed the greater of 1/4 of 1% or 5% of the annual yield to maturity or we own $1,000,000 or less of the aggregate issue price or value of the particular issuer's debt and not more than 12 months of unaccrued interest can be required to be prepaid or (B) the contingency is consistent with commercial practice and the contingency is effective upon a default or the exercise of a prepayment right by the issuer of the debt. If we hold indebtedness from any issuer, including a REIT, the indebtedness will be subject to, and may cause a violation of, the asset tests, unless it is a qualifying real estate asset or otherwise satisfies the above safe harbor. We currently own equity interests in certain entities that have elected to be taxed as REITs for federal income tax purposes and are not publicly traded. If any such entity were to fail to qualify as a REIT, we would not meet the 10% voting stock limitation and the 10% value limitation and we would fail to qualify as a REIT. We believe that we and each of the REITs we own an interest in have and will comply with the foregoing asset tests for REIT qualification. However, we cannot provide any assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will agree with our determinations.

 

For taxable years commencing on or after January 1, 2005, if we fail to satisfy the 5% or 10% asset tests described above after a 30-day cure period provided in the Internal Revenue Code, we will be deemed to have met such tests if the value of our non-qualifying assets is de minimis (i.e., does not exceed the lesser of 1% of the total value of our assets at the end of the applicable quarter or $10,000,000) and we dispose of the non-qualifying assets within six months after the last day of the quarter in which the failure to satisfy the asset tests is discovered. For violations due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect that are in excess of the de minimisexception described above, we may avoid disqualification as a REIT under any of the asset tests, after the 30-day cure period, by disposing of sufficient assets to meet the asset test within such six month period, paying a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the non-qualifying assets and disclosing certain information to the Internal Revenue Service. If we cannot avail ourselves of these relief provisions, or if we fail to timely cure any noncompliance with the asset tests, we would cease to qualify as a REIT.

 

Annual Distribution Requirements. To qualify as a REIT, we are generally required to distribute dividends, other than capital gain dividends, to our shareholders each year in an amount at least equal to 90% of our REIT taxable income. These distributions must be paid either in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if declared before we timely file our tax return for the prior year and

 

21



 

if paid with or before the first regular dividend payment date after the declaration is made. We intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy our annual distribution requirements. To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or distribute at least 90%, but less than 100% of our REIT taxable income, as adjusted, we are subject to tax on these amounts at regular corporate rates.  We will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of the required distribution over the sum of amounts actually distributed and amounts retained for which federal income tax was paid, if we fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of:  (1) 85% of our REIT ordinary income for the year; (2) 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for the year; and (3) any undistributed taxable income from prior taxable years. A REIT may elect to retain rather than distribute all or a portion of its net capital gains and pay the tax on the gains. In that case, a REIT may elect to have its shareholders include their proportionate share of the undistributed net capital gains in income as long-term capital gains and receive a credit for their share of the tax paid by the REIT. For purposes of the 4% excise tax described above, any retained amounts would be treated as having been distributed.

 

Ownership of Partnership Interests By Us. As a result of our ownership of the Operating Partnership, we will be considered to own and derive our proportionate share of the assets and items of income of the Operating Partnership, respectively, for purposes of the REIT asset and income tests, including its share of assets and items of income of any subsidiaries that are partnerships or limited liability companies.

 

State and Local Taxes. We may be subject to state or local taxation in various jurisdictions, including those in which we transact business or reside. Our state and local tax treatment may not conform to the federal income tax treatment discussed above. Consequently, prospective shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect of state and local tax laws on an investment in common shares.

 

Taxation of Domestic Shareholders Subject to U.S. Tax

 

General. If we qualify as a REIT, distributions made to our taxable domestic shareholders with respect to their common shares, other than capital gain distributions and distributions attributable to taxable REIT subsidiaries, will be treated as ordinary income to the extent that the distributions come out of earnings and profits. These distributions will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction for shareholders that are corporations nor will they constitute “qualified dividend income” under the Internal Revenue Code, meaning that such dividends will be taxed at marginal rates applicable to ordinary income rather than the special capital gain rates applicable to qualified dividend income distributed to shareholders who satisfy applicable holding period requirements. In determining whether distributions are out of earnings and profits, we will allocate our earnings and profits first to preferred shares and second to the common shares. The portion of ordinary dividends, made after December 31, 2002, which represent ordinary dividends we receive from a TRS, will be designated as “qualified dividend income” to REIT shareholders and are eligible for preferential tax rates if paid to our non-corporate shareholders.

 

To the extent we make distributions to our taxable domestic shareholders in excess of our earnings and profits, such distributions will be considered a return of capital. Such distributions will be treated as a tax-free distribution and will reduce the tax basis of a shareholder’s common shares by the amount of the distribution so treated. To the extent such distributions cumulatively exceed a taxable domestic shareholder’s tax basis; such distributions are taxable as a gain from the sale of shares. Shareholders may not include in their individual income tax returns any of our net operating losses or capital losses.

 

Dividends declared by a REIT in October, November, or December are deemed to have been paid by the REIT and received by its shareholders on December 31 of that year, so long as the dividends are actually paid during January of the following year.  However, this treatment only applies to the extent of the REIT’s earnings and profits existing on December 31. To the extent the shareholder distribution paid in January exceeds available earnings and profits as of December 31, the excess is treated as a distribution taxable to shareholders in the year paid. As such, for tax reporting purposes, January distributions paid to

 

22



 

our shareholders may be split between two tax years.

 

Distributions made by us that we properly designate as capital gain dividends will be taxable to taxable domestic shareholders as gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset held for more than one year. This treatment applies only to the extent that the designated distributions do not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable year. It applies regardless of the period for which a domestic shareholder has held his or her common shares. Despite this general rule, corporate shareholders may be required to treat up to 20% of certain capital gain dividends as ordinary income.

 

Generally, we will classify a portion of our designated capital gain dividends as a 15% rate gain distribution and the remaining portion as an unrecaptured Section 1250 gain distribution.  A 15% rate gain distribution would be taxable to taxable domestic shareholders that are individuals, estates or trusts at a maximum rate of 15%. An unrecaptured Section 1250 gain distribution would be taxable to taxable domestic shareholders that are individuals, estates or trusts at a maximum rate of 25%.

 

If, for any taxable year, we elect to designate as capital gain dividends any portion of the dividends paid or made available for the year to holders of all classes of shares of beneficial interest, then the portion of the capital gains dividends that will be allocable to the holders of common shares will be the total capital gain dividends multiplied by a fraction. The numerator of the fraction will be the total dividends paid or made available to the holders of the common shares for the year. The denominator of the fraction will be the total dividends paid or made available to holders of all classes of shares of beneficial interest.

 

We may elect to retain (rather than distribute as is generally required) net capital gain for a taxable year and pay the income tax on that gain. If we make this election, shareholders must include in income, as long-term capital gain, their proportionate share of the undistributed net capital gain. Shareholders will be treated as having paid their proportionate share of the tax paid by us on these gains. Accordingly, they will receive a tax credit or refund for the amount. Shareholders will increase the basis in their common shares by the difference between the amount of capital gain included in their income and the amount of the tax they are treated as having paid. Our earnings and profits will be adjusted appropriately.

 

In general, a shareholder will recognize gain or loss for federal income tax purposes on the sale or other disposition of common shares in an amount equal to the difference between:

 

(a)                             the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property received in the sale or other disposition; and

 

(b)                            the shareholder’s adjusted tax basis in the common shares.

 

The gain or loss will be capital gain or loss if the common shares were held as a capital asset. Generally, the capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the common shares were held for more than one year.

 

In general, a loss recognized by a shareholder upon the sale of common shares that were held for six months or less, determined after applying certain holding period rules, will be treated as long-term capital loss to the extent that the shareholder received distributions that were treated as long-term capital gains. For shareholders who are individuals, trusts and estates, the long-term capital loss will be apportioned among the applicable long-term capital gain rates to the extent that distributions received by the shareholder were previously so treated.

 

Taxation of Domestic Tax-Exempt Shareholders

 

Most tax-exempt organizations are not subject to federal income tax except to the extent of their unrelated business taxable income, which is often referred to as UBTI. Unless a tax-exempt shareholder holds its common shares as debt financed property or uses the common shares in an unrelated trade or

 

23



 

business, distributions to the shareholder should not constitute UBTI. Similarly, if a tax-exempt shareholder sells common shares, the income from the sale should not constitute UBTI unless the shareholder held the shares as debt financed property or used the shares in a trade or business.

 

However, for tax-exempt shareholders that are social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts, and qualified group legal services plans, income from owning or selling common shares will constitute UBTI unless the organization is able to properly deduct amounts set aside or placed in reserve so as to offset the income generated by its investment in common shares. These shareholders should consult their own tax advisors concerning these set aside and reserve requirements which are set forth in the Internal Revenue Code.

 

In addition, certain pension trusts that own more than 10% of a “pension-held REIT” must report a portion of the distributions that they receive from the REIT as UBTI. We have not been and do not expect to be treated as a pension-held REIT for purposes of this rule.

 

Taxation of Foreign Shareholders

 

The following is a discussion of certain anticipated United States federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of common shares applicable to a foreign shareholder. For purposes of this discussion, a “foreign shareholder” is any person other than:

 

(a)                             a citizen or resident of the United States;

 

(b)                            a corporation or partnership created or organized in the United States or under the laws of the United States or of any state thereof; or

 

(c)                            an estate or trust whose income is includable in gross income for United States federal income tax purposes regardless of its source.

 

Distributions by Us. Distributions by us to a foreign shareholder that are neither attributable to gain from sales or exchanges by us of United States real property interests nor designated by us as capital gains dividends will be treated as dividends of ordinary income to the extent that they are made out of our earnings and profits. These distributions ordinarily will be subject to withholding of United States federal income tax on a gross basis at a 30% rate, or a lower treaty rate, unless the dividends are treated as effectively connected with the conduct by the foreign shareholder of a United States trade or business. Please note that under certain treaties lower withholding rates generally applicable to dividends do not apply to dividends from REITs. Dividends that are effectively connected with a United States trade or business will be subject to tax on a net basis at graduated rates, and are generally not subject to withholding. Certification and disclosure requirements must be satisfied before a dividend is exempt from withholding under this exemption. A foreign shareholder that is a corporation also may be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a 30% rate or a lower treaty rate.

 

We expect to withhold United States income tax at the rate of 30% on any distributions made to a foreign shareholder unless:

 

(a)                             a lower treaty rate applies and any required form or certification evidencing eligibility for that reduced rate is filed with us; or

 

(b)                           the foreign shareholder files an IRS Form W-8ECI with us claiming that the distribution is effectively connected income.

 

A distribution in excess of our current or accumulated earnings and profits will not be taxable to a foreign shareholder to the extent that the distribution does not exceed the adjusted basis of the shareholder’s common shares. Instead, the distribution will reduce the adjusted basis of the common

 

24



 

shares. To the extent that the distribution exceeds the adjusted basis of the common shares, it will give rise to gain from the sale or exchange of the shareholder’s common shares. The tax treatment of this gain is described below.

 

We intend to withhold at a rate of 30%, or a lower applicable treaty rate, on the entire amount of any distribution not designated as a capital gain distribution. In such event, a foreign shareholder may seek a refund of the withheld amount from the IRS if it subsequently determined that the distribution was, in fact, in excess of our earnings and profits, and the amount withheld exceeded the foreign shareholder’s United States tax liability with respect to the distribution.

 

                From and after the taxable year ending December 31, 2005, any capital gain dividend with respect to any class of our stock which is "regularly traded" on an established securities market, will be treated as an ordinary dividend described above, if the foreign shareholder did not own more than 5% of such class of stock at any time during the taxable year. Foreign shareholders generally will not be required to report distributions received from us on U.S. federal income tax returns and all distributions treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes, including any capital gain dividends, will be subject to a 30% U.S. withholding tax (unless reduced or eliminated under an applicable income tax treaty), as described above. In addition, the branch profits tax will no longer apply to such distributions.

 

Distributions to a foreign shareholder that we designate at the time of the distributions as capital gain dividends, other than those arising from the disposition of a United States real property interest, generally will not be subject to United States federal income taxation unless:

 

(a)                            the investment in the common shares is effectively connected with the foreign shareholder’s United States trade or business, in which case the foreign shareholder will be subject to the same treatment as domestic shareholders, except that a shareholder that is a foreign corporation may also be subject to the branch profits tax, as discussed above; or

 

(b)                           the foreign shareholder is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the United States, in which case the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’s capital gains.

 

Except as described above, under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act, which is known as FIRPTA, distributions to a foreign shareholder that are attributable to gain from sales or exchanges of United States real property interests will cause the foreign shareholder to be treated as recognizing the gain as income effectively connected with a United States trade or business. This rule applies whether or not a distribution is designated as a capital gain dividend. Accordingly, foreign shareholders generally would be taxed on these distributions at the same rates applicable to U.S. shareholders, subject to a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals. In addition, a foreign corporate shareholder might be subject to the branch profits tax discussed above. We are required to withhold 35% of these distributions. The withheld amount can be credited against the foreign shareholder’s United States federal income tax liability.

 

Although the law is not entirely clear on the matter, it appears that amounts we designate as undistributed capital gains in respect of the common shares held by U.S. shareholders would be treated with respect to foreign shareholders in the same manner as actual distributions of capital gain dividends. Under that approach, foreign shareholders would be able to offset as a credit against the United States federal income tax liability their proportionate share of the tax paid by us on these undistributed capital gains. In addition, foreign shareholders would be able to receive from the IRS a refund to the extent their proportionate share of the tax paid by us were to exceed their actual United States federal income tax liability.

 

Foreign Shareholders’ Sales of Common Shares. Gain recognized by a foreign shareholder upon the sale or exchange of common shares generally will not be subject to United States taxation unless the shares constitute a “United States real property interest” within the meaning of FIRPTA. The common shares will not constitute a United States real property interest so long as we are a domestically controlled REIT. A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in which at all times during a specified testing period less than 50% in value of its stock is held directly or indirectly by foreign shareholders. We believe that we are a domestically controlled REIT. Therefore, we believe that the sale of common shares will not be subject to taxation under FIRPTA. However, because common shares and preferred shares are publicly traded, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to be a domestically controlled REIT. In any event, gain from the sale or exchange of common shares not otherwise subject to FIRPTA will be subject to U.S. tax, if

 

25



 

either:

 

(a)                             the investment in the common shares is effectively connected with the foreign shareholder’s United States trade or business, in which case the foreign shareholder will be subject to the same treatment as domestic shareholders with respect to the gain; or

 

(b)                           the foreign shareholder is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a tax home in the United States, in which case the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’s capital gains.

 

Even if we do not qualify as or cease to be a domestically controlled REIT, gain arising from the sale or exchange by a foreign shareholder of common shares still would not be subject to United States taxation under FIRPTA as a sale of a United States real property interest if:

 

(a)                             the class or series of shares being sold is “regularly traded,” as defined by applicable IRS regulations, on an established securities market such as the New York Stock Exchange; and

 

(b)                           the selling foreign shareholder owned 5% or less of the value of the outstanding class or series of shares being sold throughout the five-year period ending on the date of the sale or exchange.

 

If gain on the sale or exchange of common shares were subject to taxation under FIRPTA, the foreign shareholder would be subject to regular United States income tax with respect to the gain in the same manner as a taxable U.S. shareholder, subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax, a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals and the possible application of the branch profits tax in the case of foreign corporations. The purchaser of the common shares would be required to withhold and remit to the IRS 10% of the purchase price.

 

Information Reporting Requirement and Backup Withholding

 

We will report to our domestic shareholders and the Internal Revenue Service the amount of distributions paid during each calendar year and the amount of tax withheld, if any. Under certain circumstances, domestic shareholders may be subject to backup withholding. Backup withholding will apply only if such domestic shareholder fails to furnish certain information to us or the Internal Revenue Service. Backup withholding will not apply with respect to payments made to certain exempt recipients, such as corporations and tax-exempt organizations. Domestic shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding their qualification for exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for obtaining such an exemption. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the amount of any backup withholding with respect to a payment to a domestic shareholder will be allowed as a credit against such person’s United States federal income tax liability and may entitle such person to a refund, provided that the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.

 

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

 

26



Item 2.  Properties

 

As of December 31, 2005, the Company, directly or indirectly through investments in title holding entities, owned all or a portion of 926 properties in 31 states and the District of Columbia consisting of 197,404 units.  The Company’s properties are more fully described as follows:

 

Type

 

Properties

 

Units

 

Average
Units

 

December 31, 2005
Occupancy

 

Garden

 

568

 

150,337

 

265

 

93.9

%

Mid/High-Rise

 

57

 

15,896

 

279

 

94.5

%

Ranch

 

300

 

27,478

 

92

 

91.8

%

Military Housing

 

1

 

3,693

 

3,693

 

95.3

%

Total

 

926

 

197,404

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resident leases are generally for twelve months in length and typically require security deposits.  The garden-style properties are generally defined as properties with two and/or three story buildings while the mid-rise/high-rise are defined as properties with greater than three story buildings.  These two property types typically provide residents with amenities, which may include a clubhouse, swimming pool, laundry facilities and cable television access. Certain of these properties offer additional amenities such as saunas, whirlpools, spas, sports courts and exercise rooms or other amenities.  The ranch-style properties are defined as single story properties, which do not provide additional amenities for residents other than laundry facilities and cable television access.  The military housing properties are defined as those properties located on military bases.

 

It is management’s role to monitor compliance with property policies and to provide preventive maintenance of the properties including common areas, facilities and amenities.  The Company has a dedicated training and education department that creates and coordinates training and strategic implementation for the Company’s property management personnel.  The Company believes that, due in part to its emphasis on training and employee quality, the properties historically have had high occupancy rates.

 

The distribution of the properties throughout the United States reflects the Company’s belief that geographic diversification helps insulate the portfolio from regional and economic influences.  At the same time, the Company has sought to create clusters of properties within each of its primary markets in order to achieve economies of scale in management and operation.  The Company may nevertheless acquire additional multifamily properties located anywhere in the continental United States.

 

The following tables set forth certain information by type and state relating to the Company’s properties (occupancy information excludes condominium conversion, development and unstabilized acquired properties) at December 31, 2005:

 

27



 

GARDEN-STYLE PROPERTIES

 

State

 

Properties

 

Units

 

Percentage of
Total Units

 

December 31, 2005
Occupancy

 

Arizona

 

43

 

11,676

 

5.91

%

95.1

%

California

 

97

 

24,495

 

12.41

 

94.2

 

Colorado

 

27

 

8,560

 

4.33

 

94.3

 

Connecticut

 

20

 

2,528

 

1.28

 

92.4

 

Florida

 

71

 

21,725

 

11.01

 

95.0

 

Georgia

 

30

 

9,605

 

4.87

 

94.1

 

Illinois

 

7

 

2,360

 

1.20

 

92.5

 

Maine

 

5

 

672

 

0.34

 

85.8

 

Maryland

 

21

 

5,145

 

2.61

 

91.7

 

Massachusetts

 

36

 

5,094

 

2.58

 

93.5

 

Michigan

 

4

 

1,114

 

0.56

 

91.4

 

Minnesota

 

17

 

3,819

 

1.93

 

93.4

 

Missouri

 

1

 

192

 

0.10

 

95.8

 

New Hampshire

 

1

 

390

 

0.20

 

80.7

 

New Jersey

 

4

 

1,402

 

0.71

 

93.6

 

New Mexico

 

2

 

369

 

0.19

 

92.6

 

New York

 

1

 

300

 

0.15

 

95.6

 

North Carolina

 

27

 

7,491

 

3.79

 

93.7

 

Oklahoma

 

7

 

1,828

 

0.93

 

94.5

 

Oregon

 

10

 

3,604

 

1.83

 

94.4

 

Rhode Island

 

5

 

778

 

0.39

 

94.2

 

Tennessee

 

9

 

2,603

 

1.32

 

93.3

 

Texas

 

65

 

19,987

 

10.12

 

94.1

 

Virginia

 

14

 

4,491

 

2.28

 

93.7

 

Washington

 

41

 

9,423

 

4.77

 

93.9

 

Wisconsin

 

3

 

686

 

0.35

 

92.8

 

Total Garden-Style

 

568

 

150,337

 

76.16

%

 

 

Average Garden-Style

 

 

 

265

 

 

 

93.9

%

 

28



 

MID-RISE/HIGH RISE PROPERTIES

 

State

 

Properties

 

Units

 

Percentage of
Total Units

 

December 31, 2005
Occupancy

 

California

 

3

 

682

 

0.35

%

97.3

%

Colorado

 

1

 

339

 

0.17

 

85.4

 

Connecticut

 

1

 

263

 

0.13

 

93.5

 

Florida

 

3

 

653

 

0.33

 

96.5

 

Georgia

 

3

 

854

 

0.43

 

93.5

 

Illinois

 

2

 

927

 

0.47

 

95.7

 

Massachusetts

 

12

 

3,470

 

1.76

 

94.5

 

Minnesota

 

1

 

163

 

0.08

 

88.3

 

New Jersey

 

5

 

1,366

 

0.69

 

95.2

 

New York

 

5

 

1,822

 

0.92

 

97.0

 

Texas

 

3

 

596

 

0.30

 

95.8

 

Virginia

 

6

 

2,599

 

1.32

 

93.9

 

Washington

 

10

 

2,012

 

1.02

 

93.4

 

Washington, D.C.

 

2

 

150

 

0.08

 

90.0

 

Total Mid-Rise/High-Rise

 

57

 

15,896

 

8.05

%

 

 

Average Mid-Rise/High-Rise

 

 

 

279

 

 

 

94.5

%

 

RANCH-STYLE PROPERTIES

 

Florida

 

86

 

8,112

 

4.11

%

95.0

%

Georgia

 

53

 

4,413

 

2.24

 

92.4

 

Indiana

 

40

 

3,877

 

1.96

 

90.5

 

Kentucky

 

19

 

1,533

 

0.78

 

90.6

 

Maryland

 

4

 

414

 

0.21

 

89.3

 

Michigan

 

17

 

1,536

 

0.78

 

87.4

 

Ohio

 

72

 

6,791

 

3.44

 

90.3

 

Pennsylvania

 

5

 

469

 

0.24

 

88.0

 

South Carolina

 

2

 

187

 

0.09

 

88.7

 

Tennessee

 

2

 

146

 

0.07

 

95.9

 

Total Ranch-Style

 

300

 

27,478

 

13.92

%

 

 

Average Ranch-Style

 

 

 

92

 

 

 

91.8

%

 

MILITARY HOUSING PROPERTIES

 

Washington (Ft. Lewis)

 

1

 

3,693

 

1.87

%

95.3

%

Total Military Housing

 

1

 

3,693

 

1.87

%

 

 

Average Military Housing

 

 

 

3,693

 

 

 

95.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Residential Portfolio

 

926

 

197,404

 

100

%

 

 

 

29



 

The properties currently in various stages of development at December 31, 2005 are included in the following table.

 

CONSOLIDATED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS as of December 31, 2005

(Amounts in thousands except for project and unit amounts)

 

Projects

 

Location

 

Units

 

Total
Capital
 Cost (1)

 

Total Book
Value to
Date (1) (2)

 

Percentage
Completed

 

Percentage
Leased

 

Percentage
Occupied

 

Estimated Completion Date

 

Estimated Stabilization
Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projects Under Development

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2400 M Street

 

Washington, D.C.

 

359

 

$

111,947

 

$

104,336

 

97

%

—

 

—

 

2Q 2006

 

3Q 2007

 

Union Station

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

278

 

62,030

 

46,343

 

73

%

—

 

—

 

2Q 2006

 

4Q 2006

 

Bella Vista III (3)

 

Woodland Hills, CA

 

264

 

71,139

 

35,315

 

26

%

—

 

—

 

4Q 2006

 

3Q 2007

 

Vintage

 

Ontario, CA

 

300

 

52,412

 

17,105

 

9

%

—

 

—

 

1Q 2007

 

4Q 2007

 

Highland Glen II (3)

 

Westwood, MA

 

102

 

21,620

 

1,997

 

1

%

—

 

—

 

1Q 2007

 

4Q 2007

 

Silver Spring

 

Silver Spring, MD

 

457

 

145,224

 

19,091

 

1

%

—

 

—

 

1Q 2008

 

4Q 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Projects Under Development

 

 

 

1,760

 

464,372

 

224,187

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Completed Not Stabilized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indian Ridge

 

Waltham, MA

 

264

 

47,032

 

44,840

 

100

%

78

%

72

%

Completed

 

3Q 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Projects Completed Not Stabilized

 

 

 

264

 

47,032

 

44,840

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Completed And Stabilized During the Fourth Quarter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1210 Massachusetts Ave. (Sovereign Park)

 

Washington, D.C.

 

144

 

39,702

 

39,527

 

100

%

93

%

92

%

Completed

 

Stabilized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Projects Completed And Stabilized During the Fourth Quarter

 

 

 

144

 

39,702

 

39,527

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Projects

 

8

 

2,168

 

$

551,106

 

$

308,554

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)  Total capital cost represents estimated development cost for projects under development and all capitalized costs incurred to date plus any estimates of costs remaining to be funded for all completed projects.

 

(2)  Of the total book value to date, $83.8 million has been transferred to land and depreciable property and $224.8 million is currently reflected as construction in progress (“CIP”). The remaining $180.5 million of CIP represents land held for future development and related costs and land and related development costs for uncompleted condominium projects.  Of the $242.6 million remaining to be invested, $55.5 million will be funded through third party construction mortgages.

 

(3) Projects are wholly owned.  All others are partially owned.

 

30



 

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

 

The Company tried a class action lawsuit in Palm Beach County, Florida during the last week of August of 2004 which challenged the assessment and collection of certain lease termination fees.  The case has been settled, subject to court approval.  The Company will pay $1.7 million into a class fund, $1.629 million of which was previously accrued during 2004.  In addition, the Company will pay $325,000 to reimburse class counsel for its out of pocket expenses, plus $2.55 million in attorney’s fees.  Costs of claims administration will be approximately $100,000.  An accrual for these additional potential payments was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005.  Preliminary court approval of the settlement was obtained in February 2006 and final judgment is expected in the second quarter of 2006.

 

The Company does not believe there is any other litigation pending or threatened against the Company which, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably may be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

None.

 

31



 

PART II

 

Item 5.           Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

The following table sets forth, for the years indicated, the high, low and closing sales prices for and the distributions paid on the Company’s Common Shares, which trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol EQR.

 

 

 

Sales Price

 

 

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Closing

 

Distributions

 

2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth Quarter Ended December 31, 2005

 

$

42.17

 

$

35.52

 

$

39.12

 

$

0.4425

 

Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2005

 

$

40.74

 

$

36.35

 

$

37.85

 

$

0.4325

 

Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2005

 

$

37.57

 

$

31.50

 

$

36.82

 

$

0.4325

 

First Quarter Ended March 31, 2005

 

$

36.37

 

$

30.70

 

$

32.21

 

$

0.4325

 

 

 

 

Sales Price

 

 

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Closing

 

Distributions

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth Quarter Ended December 31, 2004

 

$

36.75

 

$

30.86

 

$

36.18

 

$

0.4325

 

Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2004

 

$

33.21

 

$

28.74

 

$

31.00

 

$

0.4325

 

Second Quarter Ended June 30, 2004

 

$

31.11

 

$

26.65

 

$

29.73

 

$

0.4325

 

First Quarter Ended March 31, 2004

 

$

31.10

 

$

28.31

 

$

29.85

 

$

0.4325

 

 

The number of record holders of Common Shares at February 3, 2006, was approximately 4,600.  The number of outstanding Common Shares as of February 3, 2006 was 290,425,148.  The Company did not repurchase any of its Common Shares during the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

Certain information related to equity compensation plans is set forth in Item 8, Notes 14 and 15.

 

Item 6.           Selected Financial Data

 

The following table sets forth selected financial and operating information on a historical basis for the Company.  The following information should be read in conjunction with all of the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.  The historical operating and balance sheet data have been derived from the historical financial statements of the Company.  All amounts have also been restated in accordance with the discontinued operations provisions of SFAS No. 144.  Certain capitalized terms as used herein are defined in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

32



 

CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION

(Financial information in thousands except for per share and property data)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

2001

 

OPERATING DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues from continuing operations

 

$

1,954,937

 

$

1,753,824

 

$

1,581,021

 

$

1,558,622

 

$

1,589,764

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other income

 

$

68,517

 

$

8,957

 

$

15,512

 

$

14,624

 

$

21,774

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

152,462

 

$

117,779

 

$

123,294

 

$

149,421

 

$

203,192

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations

 

$

697,655

 

$

318,443

 

$

310,706

 

$

104,296

 

$

148,906

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations, net

 

$

11,676

 

$

36,107

 

$

89,311

 

$

147,060

 

$

104,580

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

861,793

 

$

472,329

 

$

523,311

 

$

400,777

 

$

455,408

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

807,792

 

$

418,583

 

$

426,639

 

$

324,162

 

$

362,580

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share – basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations available to Common Shares

 

$

0.51

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.21

 

$

0.34

 

$

0.49

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

2.83

 

$

1.50

 

$

1.57

 

$

1.19

 

$

1.36

 

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding

 

285,760

 

279,744

 

272,337

 

271,974

 

267,349

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share – diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations available to CommonShares

 

$

0.51

 

$

0.31

 

$

0.21

 

$

0.33

 

$

0.48

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

2.79

 

$

1.48

 

$

1.55

 

$

1.18

 

$

1.34

 

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding

 

310,785

 

303,871

 

297,041

 

297,969

 

295,213

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions declared per Common Share outstanding

 

$

1.74

 

$

1.73

 

$

1.73

 

$

1.73

 

$

1.68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BALANCE SHEET DATA (at end of period):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate, before accumulated depreciation

 

$

16,590,370

 

$

14,852,621

 

$

12,874,379

 

$

13,046,263

 

$

13,016,183

 

Real estate, after accumulated depreciation

 

$

13,702,230

 

$

12,252,794

 

$

10,578,366

 

$

10,934,246

 

$

11,297,338

 

Total assets

 

$

14,098,945

 

$

12,645,275

 

$

11,466,893

 

$

11,810,917

 

$

12,235,625

 

Total debt

 

$

7,591,073

 

$

6,459,806

 

$

5,360,489

 

$

5,523,699

 

$

5,742,758

 

Minority Interests

 

$

422,183

 

$

535,582

 

$

600,929

 

$

611,303

 

$

635,822

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

$

5,395,340

 

$

5,072,528

 

$

5,015,441

 

$

5,197,123

 

$

5,413,950

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total properties (at end of period)

 

926

 

939

 

968

 

1,039

 

1,076

 

Total apartment units (at end of period)

 

197,404

 

200,149

 

207,506

 

223,591

 

224,801

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funds from operations available to Common Shares and OP Units – basic (1)(2)

 

$

784,625

 

$

651,741

 

$

640,390

 

$

719,265

 

$

706,294

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flow provided by (used for):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

714,291

 

$

717,750

 

$

744,319

 

$

888,263

 

$

889,668

 

Investing activities

 

$

(607,961

)

$

(565,968

)

$

334,028

 

$

(48,622

)

$

57,429

 

Financing activities

 

$

(101,007

)

$

(117,856

)

$

(1,058,643

)

$

(861,369

)

$

(919,266

)

 


(1)             The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines funds from operations (“FFO”) (April 2002 White Paper) as net income (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”)), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.  Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis. The April 2002 White Paper states that gain or loss on sales of property is excluded from FFO for previously depreciated operating properties only.  Once the Company commences the conversion of units to condominiums, it simultaneously discontinues depreciation of such property.

 

33



 

See Item 7 for a reconciliation of net income to FFO.

 

(2)             The Company believes that FFO is helpful to investors as a supplemental measure of the operating performance of a real estate company, because it is a recognized measure of performance by the real estate industry and by excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of depreciable property and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO can help compare the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies.  FFO in and of itself does not represent net income or net cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP.  Therefore, FFO should not be exclusively considered as an alternative to net income or to net cash flows from operating activities as determined by GAAP or as a measure of liquidity.  The Company’s calculation of FFO may differ from other real estate companies due to, among other items, variations in cost capitalization policies for capital expenditures and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other real estate companies.

 

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Overview

 

The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company should be read in connection with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto. Due to the Company’s ability to control the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries other than entities owning interests in the Unconsolidated Properties and certain other entities in which the Company has investments, the Operating Partnership and each such subsidiary entity has been consolidated with the Company for financial reporting purposes.  Capitalized terms used herein and not defined are as defined elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

Forward-looking statements in this Item 7 as well as elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are intended to be made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  These statements are based on current expectations, estimates, projections and assumptions made by management.  While the Company’s management believes the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable, such information is inherently subject to uncertainties and may involve certain risks, which could cause actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  Many of these uncertainties and risks are difficult to predict and beyond management’s control.  Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, results or events.  The Company assumes no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements because of subsequent events. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

•                  We intend to actively acquire and develop multifamily properties for rental operations and/or conversion into condominiums, as well as upgrade and sell existing properties as individual condominiums.  We may underestimate the costs necessary to bring an acquired or condominium conversion property up to standards established for its intended market position or to otherwise develop a property.  Additionally, we expect that other major real estate investors with significant capital will compete with us for attractive investment opportunities or may also develop properties in markets where we focus our development efforts.  This competition may increase prices for multifamily properties or decrease the price at which we expect to sell individual condominiums.  Upon conversion of properties to condominiums, we have increased our risk related to construction performed during the conversion.  Condominium associations may assert that the construction performed was defective, resulting in litigation and/or settlement discussions.  We may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to make suitable property acquisitions on favorable terms.  We also plan to develop more properties ourselves in addition to co-investing with our development partners for either the rental or condominium market, depending on opportunities in each sub-market.  This may increase the overall level of risk associated with our developments.  The total number of development units, cost of development and estimated completion dates are subject to uncertainties arising from changing economic conditions (such as the cost of labor and construction materials), competition and local government regulation.

 

34



 

•                  Sources of capital to the Company or labor and materials required for maintenance, repair, capital expenditure or development are more expensive than anticipated;

•                  Occupancy levels and market rents may be adversely affected by national and local economic and market conditions including, without limitation, new construction of multifamily housing, slow employment growth, availability of low interest mortgages for single-family home buyers and the potential for geopolitical instability, all of which are beyond the Company’s control; and

•                  Additional factors as discussed in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly those under “Risk Factors”.

 

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof.  The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements, which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.  Forward-looking statements and related uncertainties are also included in Note 5 and 11 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.

 

Results of Operations

 

In conjunction with our business objectives and operating strategy, the Company has continued to invest or recycle its capital investment in apartment properties located in strategically targeted markets during the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.  In summary, we:

 

Year Ended December 31, 2005:

 

•                  Acquired $2.5 billion of apartment properties consisting of forty-one properties and 12,059 units, and $138.3 million of land parcels, all of which we deem to be in our strategic targeted markets; and

•                  Sold $1.4 billion of apartment properties consisting of 50 properties and 12,848 units, as well as 2,241 condominium units for $593.3 million and five land parcels for $108.3 million.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2004:

 

•                  Acquired $900.8 million of apartment properties consisting of twenty-four properties and 6,182 units, as well as $12.4 million of land parcels; and

•                  Sold $787.8 million of apartment properties consisting of fifty-six properties and 14,159 units as well as 977 condominium units for $177.3 million and two land parcels for $27.9 million.

 

The Company’s primary financial measure for evaluating each of its apartment communities is net operating income (“NOI”).  NOI represents rental income less property and maintenance expense, real estate tax and insurance expense, and property management expense.  The Company believes that NOI is helpful to investors as a supplemental measure of the operating performance of a real estate company because it is a direct measure of the actual operating results of the Company’s apartment communities.

 

Properties that the Company owned for all of both 2005 and 2004 (the “2005 Same Store Properties”), which represented 154,854 units, impacted the Company’s results of operations.  Properties that the Company owned for all of both 2004 and 2003 (the “2004 Same Store Properties”), which represented 162,201 units, also impacted the Company’s results of operations.  Both the 2005 Same Store Properties and 2004 Same Store Properties are discussed in the following paragraphs.

 

The Company’s acquisition, disposition, completed development and consolidation of previously unconsolidated property and variable interest entity activities also impacted overall results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.  The impacts of these activities are also discussed in greater detail in the following paragraphs.

 

35



 

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2005 to the year ended December 31, 2004

 

For the year ended December 31, 2005, income from continuing operations increased by approximately $34.7 million when compared to the year ended December 31, 2004.  The increase in continuing operations is discussed below.

 

Revenues from the 2005 Same Store Properties increased $61.9 million primarily as a result of lower concessions provided residents and a slight increase in average rent per unit and occupancy rates.  Expenses from the 2005 Same Store Properties increased $36.2 million primarily due to higher payroll, utility costs and real estate taxes.  The following tables provide comparative revenue, expense, NOI and weighted average occupancy for the 2005 Same Store Properties:

 

Year 2005 vs. Year 2004
Year over Year Same-Store Results

 

$ in Millions – 154,854 Same-Store Units

 

 

Description

 

Revenues

 

Expenses (1)

 

NOI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

 

$

1,636.7

 

$

678.2

 

$

958.5

 

2004

 

$

1,574.8

 

$

642.0

 

$

932.8

 

Change

 

$

61.9

 

$

36.2

 

$

25.7

 

Change

 

3.9

%

5.6

%

2.8

%

 


(1)  Year 2005 expenses exclude $11.1 million of uninsured property damage caused by Hurricane Wilma.  Year 2004 expenses exclude $15.2 million of uninsured property damage caused by Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne.

 

Same-Store Occupancy Statistics

 

 

 

 

 

Year 2005

 

 

94.1

%

Year 2004

 

 

93.5

%

Change

 

 

0.6

%

 

The following table presents a reconciliation of operating income per the consolidated statements of operations to NOI for the 2005 Same Store Properties.

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(Amounts in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

$

511.9

 

$

490.5

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance (1)

 

11.1

 

15.2

 

Non-same store operating results

 

(143.2

)

(64.6

)

Fee and asset management revenue

 

(11.1

)

(11.8

)

Fee and asset management expense

 

9.9

 

8.8

 

Depreciation

 

508.1

 

445.4

 

General and administrative

 

71.8

 

49.3

 

Same store NOI

 

$

958.5

 

$

932.8

 

 


(1) Hurricane property damage net of reimbursement from insurance company.

 

36



 

For properties that the Company acquired prior to January 1, 2005 and expects to continue to own through December 31, 2006, the Company anticipates the following same store results for the full year ending December 31, 2006:

 

2006 Same-Store Assumptions

 

Physical Occupancy

 

94.5%

Revenue Change

 

4.75%to 5.75%

Expense Change

 

4.25%to 5.25%

NOI Change

 

4.50%to 6.50%

 

These 2006 assumptions are based on current expectations and are forward-looking.

 

Non-same store operating results increased $78.6 million and consist primarily of properties acquired in calendar years 2005 and 2004 as well as our corporate housing business.

 

Fee and asset management revenues, net of fee and asset management expenses, decreased by $1.7 million primarily as a result of lower income earned from Ft. Lewis and managing fewer properties for third parties and unconsolidated entities.  As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company managed 16,269 units and 17,988 units, respectively, for third parties and unconsolidated entities.

 

Property management expenses from continuing operations include off-site expenses associated with the self-management of the Company’s properties as well as management fees paid to any third party management companies.  These expenses increased by approximately $7.2 million or 9.4%.  This increase is primarily attributable to higher overall payroll costs including bonuses, long-term compensation costs and an increase of the Company’s match for employee 401(k) contributions.

 

Depreciation expense from continuing operations, which includes depreciation on non-real estate assets, increased $62.8 million primarily as a result of additional depreciation expense on newly acquired properties and capital expenditures for all properties owned.

 

General and administrative expenses, which include corporate operating expenses, increased approximately $22.5 million between the periods under comparison.  This increase was primarily due to higher executive compensation expense due to severance costs of $9.8 million for several executive officers, $7.9 million of additional accruals specific to performance shares for selected executive officers and a $2.5 million profit sharing accrual to be paid in the first quarter of 2006.  The Company anticipates that general and administrative expenses will approximate $50.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2006.  The above assumption is based on current expectations and is forward-looking.

 

Interest and other income from continuing operations increased approximately $59.6 million, primarily as a result of the $57.1 million in cash received for the Company’s ownership interest in Rent.com, which was acquired by eBay, Inc.

 

Interest expense from continuing operations, including amortization of deferred financing costs, increased approximately $56.2 million primarily as a result of higher overall debt balances as well as higher variable interest rates.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company capitalized interest costs of approximately $13.7 million as compared to $14.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.  This capitalization of interest primarily relates to consolidated projects under development.  The effective interest cost on all indebtedness for the year ended December 31, 2005 was 6.16% as compared to 5.87% for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

Income (loss) from investments in unconsolidated entities increased approximately $7.8 million between the periods under comparison.  This increase is primarily the result of consolidation of properties that were previously unconsolidated in the first quarter of 2004.

 

Net gain on sales of unconsolidated entities decreased $3.3 million, primarily due to a decrease in

 

37



 

the number of unconsolidated entities sold.

 

Net gain on sales of land parcels increased $24.8 million, primarily due to an increase in the number of land parcels sold and large gains recorded on two land parcels located in Tyson’s Corner, Virginia.

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations increased approximately $379.2 million between the periods under comparison.  This increase is primarily the result of higher per unit sales prices and lower real estate net book values for properties sold during the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004 as well as higher condominium sales.  The Company recognized $91.6 million and $32.1 million of net incremental gain on sales of condominium units (net of provision for income taxes) for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

Discontinued operations, net, decreased approximately $24.4 million between the periods under comparison.  The decrease in revenues and expenses between periods results from the timing, size and number of properties sold.  Any property sold after December 31, 2004 will include a full period’s results in the year ended December 31, 2004 but minimal to no results in the year ended December 31, 2005.  See Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

 

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2004 to the year ended December 31, 2003

 

For the year ended December 31, 2004, income from continuing operations decreased by approximately $5.5 million when compared to the year ended December 31, 2003 due to the reasons noted below.

 

Revenues from the 2004 Same Store Properties increased $14.1 million primarily as a result of lower concessions provided residents and a slight increase in occupancy rates.  Expenses from the 2004 Same Store Properties increased $22.5 million primarily due to higher payroll, utility costs and real estate taxes.  The following tables provide comparative revenue, expense, NOI and weighted average occupancy for the 2004 Same Store Properties:

 

Year 2004 vs. Year 2003

 

Year over Year Same-Store Results

 

$ in Millions – 162,201 Same-Store Units

 

 

Description

 

Revenues

 

Expenses (1)

 

NOI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2004

 

 

$

1,613.5

 

$

653.5

 

$

960.0

 

2003

 

 

$

1,599.4

 

$

631.0

 

$

968.4

 

Change

 

 

$

14.1

 

$

22.5

 

$

(8.4

)

Change

 

 

0.9

%

3.6

%

(0.9

)%

 


(1)     Year 2004 expenses exclude $15.2 million of uninsured property damage caused by Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne.

 

Same-Store Occupancy Statistics

 

 

 

Year 2004

 

 

93.3

%

Year 2003

 

 

93.0

%

Change

 

 

0.3

%

 

Non-same store operating results are primarily from newly acquired properties not yet included as 2004 Same Store Properties and the consolidation of all previously unconsolidated development projects.

 

38



 

Fee and asset management revenues, net of fee and asset management expenses, decreased by $4.2 million primarily as a result of lower income earned from Ft. Lewis and managing fewer properties for third parties and unconsolidated entities.  As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company managed 17,988 units and 18,475 units, respectively, for third parties and unconsolidated entities.

 

Property management expenses from continuing operations include off-site expenses associated with the self-management of the Company’s properties as well as management fees paid to any third party management companies.  These expenses increased by approximately $7.0 million or 10.1%.  This increase is primarily attributable to higher payroll costs, including bonuses and long-term compensation costs as well as severance costs for certain employees.  In addition, the property management company experienced slightly higher costs for travel, temporary help, internal conferences and legal and professional fees.

 

Depreciation expense from continuing operations, which includes depreciation on non-real estate assets, increased $62.4 million primarily as a result of the consolidation of previously unconsolidated projects and properties acquired after December 31, 2003, many of which had significantly higher per unit acquisition costs than properties previously acquired, and also due to additional depreciation on capital expenditures for all properties owned.

 

General and administrative expenses, which include corporate operating expenses, increased approximately $12.3 million between the periods under comparison.  This increase was primarily due to the costs of consulting services rendered to increase operating efficiencies and increased litigation and internal control costs partially offset by $1.4 million of immediate expense recognition related to options granted in the first quarter of 2003 to the Company’s former chief executive officer.   Consulting services were contracted to enhance resident satisfaction/retention, unit pricing and expense procurement/reduction.

 

The Company recorded impairment charges on its technology investments of approximately $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.  See Note 19 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

 

Interest and other income from continuing operations decreased approximately $6.6 million, primarily as a result of lower balances available for investments including deposits in tax deferred exchange accounts and collateral agreements related to development projects.

 

Interest expense from continuing operations, including amortization of deferred financing costs, increased approximately $12.7 million.  This increase was primarily attributable to increases in mortgage and unsecured note balances and lower capitalized interest.  During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company capitalized interest costs of approximately $14.0 million as compared to $20.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.  This capitalization of interest primarily related to equity investments in Partially Owned Properties (consolidated) engaged in development activities.  The effective interest cost on all indebtedness for the year ended December 31, 2004 was 5.87% as compared to 6.36% for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

Loss from investments in unconsolidated entities decreased approximately $2.8 million between the periods under comparison.  This decrease is primarily the result of consolidation of properties that were previously unconsolidated, partially offset by an increase in realized losses on the settlement of derivative instruments.

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations increased approximately $7.7 million between the periods under comparison.  This increase is primarily the result of an increase in the number of condominium units sold.

 

Discontinued operations, net, decreased approximately $53.2 million between the periods under comparison.  See Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

 

39



 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2005

 

As of January 1, 2005, the Company had approximately $83.5 million of cash and cash equivalents and $484.6 million available under its line of credit (net of $65.4 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit and not available for borrowing).  After taking into effect the various transactions discussed in the following paragraphs and the net cash provided by operating activities, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents balance at December 31, 2005 was approximately $88.8 million and the amount available on the Company’s revolving credit facilities was $780.8 million (net of $50.2 million which was restricted/dedicated to support letters of credit and not available for borrowing).

 

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company generated proceeds from various transactions, which included the following:

 

•                  Disposed of fifty-six properties (including various individual condominium units) and five land parcels and received net proceeds of approximately $2.0 billion;

•                  Obtained $496.2 million in net proceeds from the issuance of $500.0 million of ten and one-half year 5.125% fixed rate public notes;

•                  Obtained $280.1 million in new mortgage financing;

•                  Obtained $57.1 million for its ownership interest in Rent.com;

•                  Received $25.0 million in full redemption of 1,000,000 shares of Wellsford 8.25% Convertible Trust Preferred Securities; and

•                  Issued approximately 2.5 million Common Shares and received net proceeds of $63.1 million.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the above proceeds were primarily utilized to:

 

•                  Acquire forty-one properties and seven land parcels (including one additional unit at one property) utilizing cash of $2.2 billion;

•                  Repay $470.4 million of mortgage loans;

•                  Repay $194.3 million of fixed rate public notes;

•                  Redeem or repurchase the Series B through F Preference Interests at a liquidation value of $146.0 million;

•                  Redeem the Series B Preferred Shares at a liquidation value of $125.0 million; and

•                  Invest $180.0 million primarily in development projects.

 

Depending on its analysis of market prices, economic conditions, and other opportunities for the investment of available capital, the Company may repurchase its Common Shares pursuant to its existing share buyback program authorized by the Board of Trustees.  The Company did not repurchase any of its Common Shares during the year ended December 31, 2005 but did repurchase $31.5 million (719,800 shares at an average price per share of $43.76) during February 2006 to offset the issuance of 661,962 OP Units in connection with a property acquisition and to partially offset restricted shares granted in February 2006 ..  The Company is authorized to repurchase approximately $553.5 million of additional Common Shares.

 

The Company’s total debt summary and debt maturity schedule as of December 31, 2005, are as follows:

 

40



 

Debt Summary

 

 

 

$ Millions (1)

 

Weighted
Average Rate (1)

 

Secured

 

$

3,379

 

5.63

%

Unsecured

 

4,212

 

5.89

%

Total

 

$

7,591

 

5.76

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Rate

 

$

5,700

 

6.32

%

Floating Rate

 

1,891

 

3.75

%

Total

 

$

7,591

 

5.76

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Above Totals Include:

 

 

 

 

 

Tax Exempt

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed

 

$

135

 

4.02

%

Floating

 

629

 

2.95

%

Total

 

$

764

 

3.25

%

Unsecured Revolving Credit Facilities

 

$

769

 

3.80

%

 


(1) Net of the effect of any derivative instruments

 

Debt Maturity Schedule

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

 

$ Millions

 

% of Total

 

2006 (1)

 

$

774

 

10.2

%

2007

 

389

 

5.1

%

2008 (2)

 

1,175

 

15.5

%

2009

 

862

 

11.4

%

2010

 

264

 

3.5

%

2011

 

805

 

10.6

%

2012

 

537

 

7.1

%

2013

 

568

 

7.5

%

2014

 

505

 

6.6

%

2015+

 

1,712

 

22.5

%

Total

 

$

7,591

 

100.0

%

 


(1) Includes $150.0 million of 7.57% unsecured debt with a final maturity of 2026 that is putable in 2006.  Also includes $215.0 million outstanding on the Company’s short-term $600.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility.  This facility was terminated on January 20, 2006 in conjunction with the Company’s $400.0 million unsecured note issuance which closed on January 19, 2006.

 

(2) Includes $554.0 million outstanding on the Company’s long-term unsecured revolving credit facility which matures on May 29, 2008.

 

As of March 1, 2006, $580.0 million in debt securities remains available for issuance by the Operating Partnership under a registration statement the SEC declared effective in June 2003 and $956.5 million in equity securities remains available for issuance by the Company under a registration statement the SEC declared effective in February 1998.

 

The Company’s “Consolidated Debt-to-Total Market Capitalization Ratio” as of December 31, 2005 is presented in the following table.  The Company calculates the equity component of its market capitalization as the sum of (i) the total outstanding Common Shares and assumed conversion of all OP Units at the equivalent market value of the closing price of the Company’s Common Shares on the New York Stock

 

41



 

Exchange; (ii) the “Common Share Equivalent” of all convertible preferred shares and preference interests/units; and (iii) the liquidation value of all perpetual preferred shares and preference interests outstanding.

 

Capital Structure as of December 31, 2005

 

(Amounts in thousands except for share and per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Secured Debt

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,379,289

 

45

%

 

 

 

Unsecured Debt

 

 

 

 

 

3,442,784

 

45

%

 

 

 

Lines of Credit

 

 

 

 

 

769,000

 

10

%

 

 

 

Total Debt

 

 

 

 

 

$

7,591,073

 

100

%

37

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shares

 

289,536,344

 

93

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OP Units

 

20,424,245

 

7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Shares & OP Units

 

309,960,589

 

100

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Share Equivalents (see below)

 

1,650,760

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total outstanding at quarter-end

 

311,611,349

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Share Price at December 31, 2005

 

$

39.12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

12,190,236

 

96

%

 

 

 

Perpetual Preferred Equity (see below)

 

 

 

 

 

515,500

 

4

%

 

 

 

Total Equity

 

 

 

 

 

$

12,705,736

 

100

%

63

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Market Capitalization

 

 

 

 

 

$

20,296,809

 

 

 

100

%

 

 

Convertible Preferred Equity as of December 31, 2005

 

(Amounts in thousands except for share and per share amounts)

 

 

Series

 

Redemption
Date

 

Outstanding
Shares/Units

 

Liquidation
Value

 

Annual
Dividend
Rate Per
Share/Unit

 

Annual
Dividend
Amount

 

Weighted
Average Rate

 

Conversion
Ratio

 

Common Share Equivalents

 

Preferred Shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.00% Series E

 

11/1/98

 

529,096

 

$

13,228

 

$

1.75

 

$

926

 

 

 

1.1128

 

588,778

 

7.00% Series H

 

6/30/98

 

34,734

 

868

 

1.75

 

61

 

 

 

1.4480

 

50,295

 

Preference Interests:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.625% Series H (1)

 

3/23/06

 

190,000

 

9,500

 

3.8125

 

724

 

 

 

1.5108

 

287,052

 

7.625% Series I

 

6/22/06

 

270,000

 

13,500

 

3.8125

 

1,029

 

 

 

1.4542

 

392,634

 

7.625% Series J

 

12/14/06

 

230,000

 

11,500

 

3.8125

 

877

 

 

 

1.4108

 

324,484

 

Junior Preference Units:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.00% Series B

 

7/29/09

 

7,367

 

184

 

2.00

 

15

 

 

 

1.020408

 

7,517

 

Total Convertible Preferred Equity

 

 

 

1,261,197

 

$

48,780

 

 

 

$

3,632

 

7.44

%

 

 

1,650,760

 

 

Perpetual Preferred Equity as of December 31, 2005

(Amounts in thousands except for share and per share amounts)

Series

 

Redemption Date

 

Outstanding Shares/Units

 

Liquidation Value

 

Annual Dividend
Rate Per Share/Unit

 

Annual Dividend Amount

 

Weighted Average
Rate

 

Preferred Shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9 1/8% Series C

 

9/9/06

 

460,000

 

$

115,000

 

$

22.8125

 

$

10,494

 

 

 

8.60% Series D

 

7/15/07

 

700,000

 

175,000

 

21.50

 

15,050

 

 

 

8.29% Series K

 

12/10/26

 

1,000,000

 

50,000

 

4.145

 

4,145

 

 

 

6.48% Series N

 

6/19/08

 

600,000

 

150,000

 

16.20

 

9,720

 

 

 

Preference Interests:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.875% Series G (1)

 

3/21/06

 

510,000

 

25,500

 

3.9375

 

2,008

 

 

 

Total Perpetual
Preferred Equity

 

 

 

3,270,000

 

$

515,500

 

 

 

$

41,417

 

8.03

%

 


(1)           The Series G and H Preference Interests were called for redemption on February 10, 2006, to be effective March 21, 2006 and March 23, 2006, respectively.  See Note 3 in the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional discussion.

 

The Company expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements, including capital expenditures related to maintaining its existing properties and certain scheduled unsecured note and mortgage note repayments, generally through its working capital, net cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under its revolving credit facilities.  The Company considers its cash provided by operating activities to be

 

42



 

adequate to meet operating requirements and payments of distributions.  The Company also expects to meet its long-term liquidity requirements, such as scheduled unsecured note and mortgage debt maturities, property acquisitions, financing of construction and development activities and capital improvements through the issuance of unsecured notes and equity securities, including additional OP Units, and proceeds received from the disposition of certain properties.  In addition, the Company has significant unencumbered properties available to secure additional mortgage borrowings in the event that the public capital markets are unavailable or the cost of alternative sources of capital is too high.  The fair value of and cash flow from these unencumbered properties are in excess of the requirements the Company must maintain in order to comply with covenants under its unsecured notes and line of credit.  Of the $16.6 billion in investment in real estate on the Company’s balance sheet at December 31, 2005, $10.8 billion or 65.3%, was unencumbered.

 

As of March 1, 2006, the Operating Partnership has a revolving credit facility with potential borrowings of up to $1.0 billion.    This facility matures in May 2008 and may, among other potential uses, be used to fund property acquisitions, costs for certain properties under development and short term liquidity requirements.  As of March 1, 2006, $520.0 million was outstanding under this facility (and $54.8 million was restricted and dedicated to support letters of credit).

 

See Note 21 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of the events which occurred subsequent to December 31, 2005.

 

Capitalization of Fixed Assets and Improvements to Real Estate

 

Our policy with respect to capital expenditures is generally to capitalize expenditures that improve the value of the property or extend the useful life of the component asset of the property.  We track improvements to real estate in two major categories and several subcategories:

 

•             Replacements (inside the unit).  These include:

•                  carpets and hardwood floors;

•                  appliances;

•                  mechanical equipment such as individual furnace/air units, hot water heaters, etc;

•                  furniture and fixtures such as kitchen/bath cabinets, light fixtures, ceiling fans, sinks, tubs, toilets, mirrors, countertops, etc;

•                  flooring such as vinyl, linoleum or tile; and

•                  blinds/shades.

 

All replacements are depreciated over a five-year estimated useful life.  We expense as incurred all maintenance and turnover costs such as cleaning, interior painting of individual units and the repair of any replacement item noted above.

 

•             Building improvements (outside the unit).  These include:

•                  roof replacement and major renovations;

•                  paving or major resurfacing of parking lots, curbs and sidewalks;

•                  amenities and common areas such as pools, exterior sports and playground equipment, lobbies, clubhouses, laundry rooms, alarm and security systems and offices;

•                  major building mechanical equipment systems;

•                  interior and exterior structural repair and exterior painting and siding;

•                  major landscaping and grounds improvement; and

•                  vehicles and office and maintenance equipment.

 

All building improvements are depreciated over a five to ten-year estimated useful life.  We expense as incurred all expenditures that do not improve the value of the asset or extend its useful life.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2005, our actual improvements to real estate totaled approximately $232.5 million.  This includes the following detail (amounts in thousands except for unit and per unit

 

43



 

amounts):

 

Capitalized Improvements to Real Estate

 

For the Year Ended December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

Total Units
(1)

 

Replacements

 

Avg.
Per
Unit

 

Building
Improvements

 

Avg.
Per
Unit

 

Total

 

Avg.
Per
Unit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Established Properties (2)

 

145,305

 

$

 55,508

 

$

 382

 

$

 89,252

 

$

 614

 

$

 144,760

 

$

 996

 

New Acquisition Properties (3)

 

27,669

 

5,626

 

270

 

19,508

 

937

 

25,134

 

1,207

 

Other (4)

 

8,531

 

23,421

 

 

 

39,185

 

 

 

62,606

 

 

 

Total

 

181,505

 

$

 84,555

 

 

 

$

 147,945

 

 

 

$

 232,500

 

 

 

 


(1)          Total units exclude 15,899 unconsolidated units.

(2)          Wholly Owned Properties acquired prior to January 1, 2003.

(3)          Wholly Owned Properties acquired during 2003, 2004 and 2005.  Per unit amounts are based on a weighted average of 20,828 units.

(4)          Includes properties either Partially Owned or sold during the period, commercial space, condominium conversions and $6.8 million included in building improvements spent on nine specific assets related to major renovations and repositioning of these assets.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2004, our actual improvements to real estate totaled approximately $212.2 million.  This includes the following detail (amounts in thousands except for unit and per unit amounts):

 

Capitalized Improvements to Real Estate
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004

 

 

 

 

Total Units
(1)

 

Replacements

 

Avg.
Per
Unit

 

Building Improvements

 

Avg.
Per
Unit

 

Total

 

Avg.
Per
Unit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Established Properties (2)

 

153,442

 

$

57,300

 

$

373

 

$

95,715

 

$

624

 

$

153,015

 

$

997

 

New Acquisition Properties (3)

 

21,762

 

4,026

 

229

 

10,127

 

576

 

14,153

 

805

 

Other (4)

 

8,727

 

17,868

 

 

 

27,135

 

 

 

45,003

 

 

 

Total

 

183,931

 

$

79,194

 

 

 

$

132,977

 

 

 

$

212,171

 

 

 

 


(1)       Total units exclude 16,218 unconsolidated units.

(2)       Wholly Owned Properties acquired prior to January 1, 2002.

(3)       Wholly Owned Properties acquired during 2002, 2003 and 2004.  Per unit amounts are based on a weighted average of 17,577 units.

(4)       Includes properties either Partially Owned or sold during the period, commercial space, condominium conversions and $6.6 million included in building improvements spent on fifteen specific assets related to major renovations and repositioning of these assets.

 

The Company expects to fund approximately $170.0 million for capital expenditures for replacements and building improvements for all consolidated properties, exclusive of condominium conversion properties, in 2006.  This includes an average of approximately $1,000 per unit for capital improvements for established properties.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company’s total non-real estate capital additions, such as computer software, computer equipment, and furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements to the Company’s property management offices and its corporate offices, was approximately $17.6 million.  The

 

44



 

Company expects to fund approximately $10.8 million in total additions to non-real estate property in 2006.

 

Improvements to real estate and additions to non-real estate property were funded from net cash provided by operating activities.

 

Derivative Instruments

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes.  The Company limits these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives to hedge interest rate risk on debt instruments.

 

The Company has a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors.  When viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivatives are designed to hedge, the Company has not sustained a material loss from those instruments nor does it anticipate any material adverse effect on its net income or financial position in the future from the use of derivatives.

 

See Note 11 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of derivative instruments at December 31, 2005.

 

Other

 

Minority Interests as of December 31, 2005 decreased by $113.4 million when compared to December 31, 2004.  The primary factors that impacted this account in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets during the year ended December 31, 2005 were:

 

•                  The redemption or repurchase of 2.9 million shares of Series B through F Preference Interests with a  combined liquidation value of $146.0 million and a premium on redemption of $4.1 million (see Note 3 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion);

•                  Distributions declared to Minority Interests, which amounted to $36.1 million (excluding Junior Preference Unit and Preference Interest distributions);

•                  The allocation of income from operations to holders of OP Units in the amount of $58.5 million;

•                  The issuance of 956,751 OP Units valued at $33.7 million at an average price of $35.18 per unit; and

•                  The conversion of 1.1 million OP Units into Common Shares valued at $24.2 million at an average price of $22.29 per unit.

 

Total distributions paid in January 2006 amounted to $147.2 million (excluding distributions on Partially Owned Properties), which included certain distributions declared during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2005.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

 

The Company has co-invested in various properties that are unconsolidated and accounted for under the equity method of accounting.  Management does not believe these investments have a materially different impact upon the Company’s liquidity, capital resources, credit or market risk than its property management and ownership activities.  The nature and business purpose of these ventures are as follows:

 

45



 

•                              Institutional Ventures – During 2000 and 2001, the Company entered into ventures with an unaffiliated partner.   At the respective closing dates, the Company sold and/or contributed 45 properties containing 10,846 units to these ventures and retained a 25% ownership interest in the ventures.  The Company’s joint venture partner contributed cash equal to 75% of the agreed-upon equity value of the properties comprising the ventures, which was then distributed to the Company. The Company’s strategy with respect to these ventures was to reduce its concentration of properties in a variety of markets.

 

•                              Other – As of December 31, 2005, the Company has ownership interests in eleven properties containing 1,360 units acquired in a prior merger.  The current weighted average ownership percentage is 11.0%.  The Company’s strategy with respect to these interests is either to acquire a majority ownership or sell the Company’s interest.

 

As of December 31, 2005, the Company has six projects totaling 1,760 units in various stages of development with estimated completion dates ranging through March 31, 2008.  The primary development agreements currently in place have the following key terms:

 

•                        The first development partner has the right, at any time following completion of a project subject to the agreement, to stipulate a value for such project and offer to sell its interest in the project to the Company based on such value.  If the Company chooses not to purchase the interest, it must agree to a sale of the project to an unrelated third party at such value.  The Company’s partner must exercise this right as to all projects subject to the agreement within five years after the receipt of the final certificate of occupancy on the last developed property.   In connection with this development agreement, the Company has an obligation to provide up to $40.0 million in credit enhancements to guarantee a portion of the third party construction financing.  As of the date of this filing, the Company had no amounts outstanding related to this credit enhancement.  The Company would be required to perform under this agreement only if there was a material default under a third party construction mortgage agreement.  This agreement expires no later than December 31, 2018.  Notwithstanding the termination of the agreement, the Company shall have recourse against its development partner for any losses incurred.

 

•                        The second development partner has the right, at any time following completion of a project subject to the agreement, to require the Company to purchase the partners’ interest in that project at a mutually agreeable price.  If the Company and the partner are unable to agree on a price, both parties will obtain appraisals.  If the appraised values vary by more than 10%, both the Company and its partner will agree on a third appraiser to determine which original appraisal is closest to its determination of value.  The Company may elect at that time not to purchase the property and instead, authorize its partner to sell the project at or above the agreed-upon value to an unrelated third party.  Five years following the receipt of the final certificate of occupancy on the last developed property, the Company must purchase, at the agreed-upon price, any projects remaining unsold.

 

•                        The third development partner has the exclusive right for six months following stabilization, as defined, to market a subject project for sale.  Thereafter, either the Company or its development partner may market a subject project for sale. If the Company’s development partner proposes the sale, the Company may elect to purchase the project at the price proposed by its partner or defer the sale until two independent appraisers appraise the project.  If the two appraised values vary by more than 5%, a third appraiser will be chosen to determine the fair market value of the property.  Once a value has been determined, the Company may elect to purchase the property or authorize its development partner to sell the project at the agreed-upon value.

 

In addition, the Company has various deal-specific development agreements with partners, the overall terms of which are similar in nature to those described above.

 

46



 

See Note 6 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the Company’s investments in unconsolidated entities.

 

The Company’s guaranty of a credit enhancement agreement with respect to certain tax-exempt bonds issued to finance certain public improvements at a multifamily development project was terminated effective May 2, 2005 as the tax-exempt bonds were redeemed in full and the associated letter of credit was cancelled.

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations for the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 2005:

 

 

 

Payments Due by Year (in thousands)

 

Contractual Obligations

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 

2010

 

Thereafter

 

Total

 

Debt (a)

 

$

773,735

 

$

389,054

 

$

1,174,724

 

$

861,529

 

$

264,190

 

$

4,127,841

 

$

7,591,073

 

Operating Leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum Rent Payments (b)

 

5,920

 

4,556

 

4,404

 

4,245

 

3,725

 

4,908

 

27,758

 

Other Long-Term Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Compensation (c)

 

813

 

813

 

813

 

1,444

 

1,444

 

16,556

 

21,883

 

Total

 

$

780,468

 

$

394,423

 

$

1,179,941

 

$

867,218

 

$

269,359

 

$

4,149,305

 

$

7,640,714

 

 


(a)          Amounts include aggregate principal payments only.  The Company paid $397,886, $348,574 and $352,391 for interest on debt, inclusive of derivative instruments, for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

(b)         Minimum basic rent due for various office space the Company leases and fixed base rent due on a ground lease for one property.

(c)          Estimated payments to the Company’s Chairman, two former CEO’s and its chief operating officer based on planned retirement dates.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.  These policies were followed in preparing the consolidated financial statements at and for the year ended December 31, 2005 and are consistent with the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

The Company has identified six significant accounting policies as critical accounting policies.  These critical accounting policies are those that have the most impact on the reporting of our financial condition and those requiring significant judgments and estimates.  With respect to these critical accounting policies, management believes that the application of judgments and assessments is consistently applied and produces financial information that fairly presents the results of operations for all periods presented.  The six critical accounting policies are:

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Including Goodwill

 

The Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets, including its investments in real estate and goodwill, for indicators of permanent impairment.  The judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on factors such as operational performance, market conditions, expected holding period of each asset and legal and environmental concerns.  Future events could occur which would cause the Company to conclude that impairment indicators exist and an impairment loss is warranted.

 

Depreciation of Investment in Real Estate

 

The Company depreciates the building component of its investment in real estate over a 30-year estimated useful life, building improvements over a 5-year to 10-year estimated useful life and both the furniture, fixtures and equipment and replacements components over a 5-year estimated useful life, all of which are judgmental determinations.

 

47



 

Cost Capitalization

 

See the Capitalization of Fixed Assets and Improvements to Real Estate section for discussion of the policy with respect to capitalization vs. expensing of fixed asset/repair and maintenance costs.  In addition, the Company capitalizes the payroll and associated costs of employees directly responsible for and who spend all of their time on the supervision of major capital and/or renovation projects.  These costs are reflected on the balance sheet as an increase to depreciable property.

 

The Company follows the guidance in SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, for all development projects and uses its professional judgment in determining whether such costs meet the criteria for capitalization or must be expensed as incurred.  The Company capitalizes interest, real estate taxes and insurance and payroll and associated costs for those individuals directly responsible for and who spend all of their time on development activities, with capitalization ceasing no later than 90 days following issuance of the certificate of occupancy.  These costs are reflected on the balance sheet as construction in progress for each specific property.  The Company expenses as incurred all payroll costs of on-site employees working directly at our properties, except as noted above on our development properties prior to certificate of occupancy issuance and on specific major renovation at selected properties when additional incremental employees are hired.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Including Derivative Instruments

 

The valuation of financial instruments under SFAS No. 107 and SFAS No. 133 and its amendments (SFAS Nos. 137/138/149) requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments.  The Company, where possible, bases the fair values of its financial instruments, including its derivative instruments, on listed market prices and third party quotes. Where these are not available, the Company bases its estimates on current instruments with similar terms and maturities or on other factors relevant to the financial instruments.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Rental income attributable to leases is recorded when due from residents and is recognized monthly as it is earned, which is not materially different than on a straight-line basis.  Leases entered into between a resident and a property for the rental of an apartment unit are generally year-to-year, renewable upon consent of both parties on an annual or monthly basis.  Fee and asset management revenue and interest income are recorded on an accrual basis.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company elected to account for its stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and its amendment (SFAS No. 148), Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, effective in the first quarter of 2003, which resulted in compensation expense being recorded based on the fair value of the stock compensation granted.

 

The Company elected the “Prospective Method” which requires expensing of employee awards granted or modified after January 1, 2003.  Compensation expense under all of the Company’s plans is generally recognized over periods ranging from three months to five years.  See Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion and comparative information regarding application of the fair value method to all outstanding employee awards.

 

Funds From Operations

 

For the year ended December 31, 2005, Funds From Operations (“FFO”) available to Common Shares and OP Units increased $132.9 million, or 20.4%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2004, FFO available to Common Shares and OP Units increased $11.4 million, or 1.8%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

48



 

The following is a reconciliation of net income to FFO available to Common Shares and OP Units for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

 

Funds From Operations
(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

Net income

 

$

861,793

 

$

472,329

 

$

523,311

 

Allocation to Minority Interests – Operating Partnership

 

58,514

 

31,228

 

34,658

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

508,140

 

445,374

 

383,021

 

Depreciation – Non-real estate additions

 

(5,752

)

(5,574

)

(7,019

)

Depreciation – Partially Owned and Unconsolidated Properties

 

2,487

 

1,903

 

19,911

 

Net (gain) on sales of unconsolidated entities

 

(1,330

)

(4,593

)

(4,942

)

Discontinued Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

20,818

 

51,209

 

88,548

 

Net (gain) on sales of discontinued operations

 

(697,655

)

(318,443

)

(310,706

)

Net incremental gain on sales of condominium units

 

91,611

 

32,054

 

10,280

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FFO (1)(2)

 

838,626

 

705,487

 

737,062

 

Preferred distributions

 

(49,642

)

(53,746

)

(76,435

)

Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares

 

(4,359

)

—

 

(20,237

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FFO available to Common Shares and OP Units

 

$

784,625

 

$

651,741

 

$

640,390

 

 


(1)           The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines funds from operations (“FFO”) (April 2002 White Paper) as net income (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP)), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable property, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.  Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis.  The April 2002 White Paper states that gain or loss on sales of property is excluded from FFO for previously depreciated operating properties only.  Once the Company commences the conversion of units to condominiums, it simultaneously discontinues depreciation of such property.

 

(2)           The Company believes that FFO is helpful to investors as a supplemental measure of the operating performance of a real estate company, because it is a recognized measure of performance by the real estate industry and by excluding gains or losses related to dispositions of depreciable property and excluding real estate depreciation (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar condition based on historical cost accounting and useful life estimates), FFO can help compare the operating performance of a company’s real estate between periods or as compared to different companies.  FFO in and of itself does not represent net income or net cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP.  Therefore, FFO should not be exclusively considered as an alternative to net income or to net cash flows from operating activities as determined by GAAP or as a measure of liquidity.  The Company’s calculation of FFO may differ from other real estate companies due to, among other items, variations in cost capitalization policies for capital expenditures and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other real estate companies.

 

49



 

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

 

Market risks relating to the Company’s financial instruments result primarily from changes in short-term LIBOR interest rates.  The Company does not have any direct foreign exchange or other significant market risk.

 

The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the unsecured revolving credit facilities.  The Company typically incurs fixed rate debt obligations to finance acquisitions and capital expenditures, while it typically incurs floating rate debt obligations to finance working capital needs and as a temporary measure in advance of securing long-term fixed rate financing.  The Company continuously evaluates its level of floating rate debt with respect to total debt and other factors, including its assessment of the current and future economic environment.

 

The Company also utilizes certain derivative financial instruments to limit market risk.  Interest rate protection agreements are used to convert floating rate debt to a fixed rate basis or vice versa.  Derivatives are used for hedging purposes rather than speculation.  The Company does not enter into financial instruments for trading purposes.   See also Note 11 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion of derivative instruments.

 

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments (including such items in the financial statement captions as cash and cash equivalents, other assets, lines of credit, accounts payable and accrued expenses, rents received in advance and other liabilities) approximate their carrying or contract values based on their nature, terms and interest rates that approximate current market rates.  The fair value of the Company’s mortgage notes payable and unsecured notes were both approximately $3.6 billion at December 31, 2005.

 

The Company had total outstanding floating rate debt of approximately $1.9 billion, or 24.9% of total debt at December 31, 2005, net of the effects of any derivative instruments.  If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt permanently increased by 37 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the increase in interest expense on the floating rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $7.1 million.  If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt permanently decreased by 37 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the decrease in interest expense on the floating rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $7.1 million.

 

At December 31, 2005, the Company had total outstanding fixed rate debt of approximately $5.7 billion, net of the effects of any derivative instruments.  If market rates of interest permanently increased by 63 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt would be approximately $5.2 billion.  If market rates of interest permanently decreased by 63 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt would be approximately $6.3 billion.

 

At December 31, 2005, the Company’s derivative instruments had a net liability fair value of approximately $6.0 million.  If market rates of interest permanently increased by 49 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the net liability fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments would be approximately $0.1 million.  If market rates of interest permanently decreased by 49 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the net liability fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments would be approximately $11.5 million.

 

The Company had total outstanding floating rate debt of approximately $1.4 billion, or 21.5% of total debt at December 31, 2004, net of the effects of any derivative instruments.  If market rates of interest on all of the floating rate debt permanently increased by 25 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the increase in interest expense on the floating rate debt would decrease future earnings and cash flows by approximately $3.5 million.  If market rates of interest on all of the

 

50



 

floating rate debt permanently decreased by 25 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the decrease in interest expense on the floating rate debt would increase future earnings and cash flows by approximately $3.5 million.

 

At December 31, 2004, the Company had total outstanding fixed rate debt of approximately $5.1 billion, net of the effects of any derivative instruments.  If market rates of interest permanently increased by 65 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt would be approximately $4.6 billion.  If market rates of interest permanently decreased by 65 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt would be approximately $5.6 billion.

 

At December 31, 2004, the Company’s derivative instruments had a net liability fair value of approximately $7.9 million.  If market rates of interest permanently increased by 40 basis points (a 10% increase from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the net liability fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments would be approximately $13.9 million.  If market rates of interest permanently decreased by 40 basis points (a 10% decrease from the Company’s existing weighted average interest rates), the net liability fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments would be approximately $2.2 million.

 

These amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on the Company’s financial instruments.  The foregoing assumptions apply to the entire amount of the Company’s debt and derivative instruments and do not differentiate among maturities.  These analyses do not consider the effects of the changes in overall economic activity that could exist in such an environment.  Further, in the event of changes of such magnitude, management would likely take actions to further mitigate its exposure to the changes.  However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, this analysis assumes no changes in the Company’s financial structure or results.

 

The Company cannot predict the effect of adverse changes in interest rates on its debt and derivative instruments and, therefore, its exposure to market risk, nor can there be any assurance that long term debt will be available at advantageous pricing.  Consequently, future results may differ materially from the estimated adverse changes discussed above.

 

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.

 

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

 

Item 9A.   Controls and Procedures

 

(a)                            Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:

Effective as of December 31, 2005, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15.  Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its Exchange Act filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

 

(b)                            Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

Equity Residential’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.  Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s Chief Executive

 

51



 

Officer and Chief Financial Officer, management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

 

Based on the Company’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005.  Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein at Item 8, page F-3.

 

(c)                            Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting:

There were no changes to the internal control over financial reporting of the Company identified in connection with the Company’s evaluation referred to above that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 9B.   Other Information

 

None.

 

52



 

PART III

 

Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.

 

Trustees and Executive Officers of the Registrant, Executive Compensation, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters, Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

 

The information required by Item 10, Item 11, Item 12, Item 13 and Item 14 is incorporated by reference to, and will be contained in, the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which the Company anticipates will be filed no later than April 14, 2006, and thus these items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

 

53



 

PART IV

 

Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

 

(a)

(1) See Index to Financial Statements and Schedules on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.

(2 & 3) See Items (b) and (c) below.

 

(b) Exhibits:

3.1##

 

Articles of Restatement of Declaration of Trust of Equity Residential dated December 9, 2004.

3.2+

 

Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Equity Residential dated December 9, 2004.

4.1*

 

Indenture, dated October 1, 1994, between the Operating Partnership, as obligor and The First National Bank of Chicago, as trustee (“Indenture”).

4.2**

 

First Supplemental Indenture to Indenture, dated as of September 9, 2004.

4.3++++

 

Form of 6.69% Note due October 30, 2006.

4.4+++++

 

Description of 7 5/8% Notes due April 15, 2007.

4.5@

 

Form of 6.9% Note due August 1, 2007.

4.6@@

 

Form of 4.861% Note due November 30, 2007.

4.7@@@

 

Form of 4.75% Note due June 15, 2009.

4.8@@@@

 

Terms Agreement regarding 6.95% Notes due March 2, 2011.

4.9§

 

Terms Agreement regarding 6.625% Notes due March 15, 2012.

4.10§§

 

Form of 5.2% Note due April 1, 2013.

4.11§§§

 

Form of 5.25% Note due September 15, 2014.

4.12§§§§

 

Terms Agreement regarding 6.63% (subsequently remarketed to a 6.584% fixed rate) Notes due April 13, 2015.

4.13§§§§§

 

Terms Agreement regarding 7 1/8% Notes due October 15, 2017.

4.14§§§§§§

 

Terms Agreement regarding 7.57% Notes due August 15, 2026.

4.15++

 

Terms Agreement regarding 5.125% Notes due March 15, 2016.

10.1^

 

Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of ERP Operating Limited Partnership.

10.2^^

 

Master Amendment to Other Securities Term Sheets and Joinders to Operating Partnership Agreement of ERP Operating Limited Partnership dated December 19, 2003.

10.3^^

 

Assignment and Assumption Agreement between the Company and ERP Operating Limited Partnership dated December 19, 2003.

10.4***

 

Noncompetition Agreement (Zell).

10.5***

 

Noncompetition Agreement (Spector).

10.6***

 

Form of Noncompetition Agreement (other officers).

10.7***

 

Amended and Restated Master Reimbursement Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1996
by and between Federal National Mortgage Association and EQR-Bond Partnership.

10.8••

 

Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of April 1, 2005 among ERP Operating Limited Partnership, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as joint lead arrangers and joint book runners, Commerzbank AG, New York and Grand Cayman Branches, Wachovia Bank, National Association, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Suntrust Bank, and US Bank National Association, as co-documentation agents, and a syndicate of other banks (the “Credit Agreement”).

10.9••

 

Guaranty of Payment, made as of April 1, 2005, between Equity Residential and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the banks party to the Credit Agreement.

10.10^^^^

 

Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of August 30, 2005 among ERP Operating Limited Partnership, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and a bank, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as syndication agent and a bank, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as documentation agent, and Merrill Lynch Bank USA, as a bank (the “Short-Term Credit Agreement”).

 

54



 

10.11^^^^

 

Guaranty of Payment made as of August 30, 2005 between Equity Residential and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the banks party to the Short-Term Credit Agreement.

10.12****

 

Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Lexford Properties, L.P.

10.13•

 

Amended and Restated Equity Residential Advantage Retirement Savings Plan, effective January 1, 2001.

10.14^^

 

First Amendment to the Equity Residential Advantage Retirement Savings Plan, effective December 2002.

10.15^^

 

Second Amendment to the Equity Residential Advantage Retirement Savings Plan, effective December 2002.

10.16^^

 

Third Amendment to the Equity Residential Advantage Retirement Savings Plan, effective May 2003.

10.17•••

 

Equity Residential 2002 Share Incentive Plan.

10.18##

 

First Amendment to Equity Residential 2002 Share Incentive Plan.

10.19##

 

Second Amendment to Equity Residential 2002 Share Incentive Plan.

10.20###

 

Third Amendment to Equity Residential 2002 Share Incentive Plan.

10.21

 

Fourth Amendment to Equity Residential 2002 Share Incentive Plan.

10.22##

 

Form of Equity Residential Performance Based Unit Award Grant Agreement.

10.23•

 

Form of Change in Control Agreement between the Company and other executive officers.

10.24^^

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each trustee and executive officer.

10.25#

 

Amended and Restated Executive Compensation Agreement between the Company and Samuel Zell dated March 5, 2003, but effective as of January 1, 2003.

10.26##

 

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Executive Compensation Agreement between the Company and Samuel Zell dated February 3, 2005.

10.27###

 

Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Compensation Agreement between the Company and Samuel Zell dated April 25, 2005.

10.28•

 

Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Agreement between the Company and Gerald A. Spector dated January 1, 2002.

10.29•

 

Retirement Benefits Agreement between Samuel Zell and the Company dated October 18, 2001.

10.30#

 

Employment Agreement between the Company and Bruce W. Duncan dated as of January 20, 2003.

10.31####

 

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Bruce W. Duncan dated as of March 28, 2005.

10.32^^^

 

First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Bruce W. Duncan, dated June 30, 2005.

10.33#

 

Deferred Compensation Agreement between the Company and Bruce W. Duncan dated as of January 20, 2003.

10.34^^^^^

 

Summary of Changes to Trustee Compansation.

10.35

 

Equity Residential Supplemental Executive Retirement Savings Plan as Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2003.

10.36

 

Amendment No. 1 to the Equity Residential Supplemental Executive Retirement Savings Plan.

12

 

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges.

21

 

List of Subsidiaries of Equity Residential.

23.1

 

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

24.1

 

Power of Attorney for John W. Alexander dated February 27, 2006.

24.2

 

Power of Attorney for Stephen O. Evans dated February 28, 2006.

24.3

 

Power of Attorney for Charles L. Atwood dated February 24, 2006.

24.4

 

Power of Attorney for Desiree G. Rogers dated March 1, 2006.

24.5

 

Power of Attorney for B. Joseph White dated February 23, 2006.

24.6

 

Power of Attorney for Sheli Z. Rosenberg dated February 23, 2006.

24.7

 

Power of Attorney for James D. Harper, Jr. dated February 24, 2006.

 

55



 

24.8

 

Power of Attorney for Boone A. Knox dated February 24, 2006.

24.9

 

Power of Attorney for Samuel Zell dated February 24, 2006.

24.10

 

Power of Attorney for Gerald A. Spector dated February 27, 2006.

31.1

 

Certification of David J. Neithercut, Chief Executive Officer.

31.2

 

Certification of Donna Brandin, Chief Financial Officer.

32.1

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, of David J. Neithercut, Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

32.2

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, of Donna Brandin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

 


+

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 9, 2004, filed on December 10, 2004.

++

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on September 13, 2005.

+++

 

N/A

++++

 

Included as an exhibit to Form 8-K of Merry Land & Investment Company, Inc., filed on October 31, 1997.

+++++

 

Contained in 424B2 Prospectus Filing of Evans Withycombe Residential, Inc. dated March 28, 1997.

@

 

Included as an exhibit to Form 8-K of Merry Land & Investment Company, Inc., filed on July 29, 1997.

@@

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on November 20, 2002.

@@@

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on June 4, 2004.

@@@@

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on March 2, 2001.

§

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on March 14, 2002.

§§

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on March 19, 2003.

§§§

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on September 10, 2004.

§§§§

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on April 13, 1998.

§§§§§

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on October 9, 1997.

§§§§§§

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on August 13, 1996.

*

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 10/A, dated December 12, 1994, File No. 0-24920, and incorporated herein by reference.

**

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K, filed on September 10, 2004.

***

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form S-11 Registration Statement, File No. 33-63158, and incorporated herein by reference.

****

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.

^

 

Included as an exhibit to the Operating Partnership’s Form 8-K/A dated July 23, 1998, filed on August 18, 1998.

^^

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

^^^

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005.

^^^^

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated August 30, 2005, filed on September 2, 2005.

^^^^^

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 21, 2005, filed on September 27, 2005.

•

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

••

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated April 1, 2005, filed on April 4, 2005.

•••

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form S-8 filed on January 21, 2003.

#

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

##

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

###

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005.

####

 

Included as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 28, 2005.

 

 

 

 

(c)                               Financial Statement Schedules: See Index to Financial Statements attached hereto on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.

 

56



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

 

 

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

/s/

David J. Neithercut

 

 

 

 

David J. Neithercut

 

 

 

  President, Chief Executive Officer,

 

 

  and Trustee

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

/s/

Donna Brandin

 

 

 

 

Donna Brandin

 

 

 

  Executive Vice President and

 

 

         Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

/s/

Mark L. Wetzel

 

 

 

 

Mark L. Wetzel

 

 

 

  Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting

 

 

        Officer, *Attorney-in-fact

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated have signed this report below.

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

/s/

Samuel Zell*

 

 

 

 

Samuel Zell

 

 

 

Chairman of the Board of Trustees

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

/s/

Gerald A. Spector*

 

 

 

 

Gerald A. Spector

 

 

 

  Executive Vice President, Chief

 

 

     Operating Officer and Trustee

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

 /s/

Sheli Z. Rosenberg*

 

 

 

 

Sheli Z. Rosenberg

 

 

 

 

Trustee

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

 /s/

James D. Harper*

 

 

 

 

James D. Harper

 

 

 

Trustee

 

 

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

 /s/

John W. Alexander*

 

 

 

 

John W. Alexander

 

 

 

Trustee

 

57



 

SIGNATURES-CONTINUED

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

 /s/

B. Joseph White*

 

 

 

 

B. Joseph White

 

 

 

Trustee

 

 

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

 /s/

Charles L. Atwood*

 

 

 

 

Charles L. Atwood

 

 

 

Trustee

 

 

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

 /s/

Desiree G. Rogers*

 

 

 

 

Desiree G. Rogers

 

 

 

Trustee

 

 

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

 /s/

Stephen O. Evans*

 

 

 

 

Stephen O. Evans

 

 

 

Trustee

 

 

 

Date:

March 8, 2006

 

By:

 /s/

Boone A. Knox*

 

 

 

 

Boone A. Knox

 

 

 

Trustee

 

 

 

* By:

 /s/ Mark L. Wetzel

 

 

 

 

    Mark L. Wetzel

 

 

 

    as Attorney-in-fact

 

 

 

58



 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE

 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

 

 

PAGE

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT

 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on

 

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

F-3

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of

 

December 31, 2005 and 2004

F-4

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations for

 

the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

F-5 to F-6

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for

 

the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

F-7 to F-9

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

 

for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003

F-10 to F-11

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-12 to F-46

 

 

SCHEDULE FILED AS PART OF THIS REPORT

 

 

 

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

S-1 to S-19

 

All other schedules have been omitted because they are inapplicable, not required or the information is included elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

 



 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders

Equity Residential

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Equity Residential (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index to the financial statements and schedule. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Equity Residential at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

 

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for variable interest entities in 2004.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Equity Residential’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 28, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

 

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

February 28, 2006, except for the fourth paragraph of Note 21,
for which the date is March 2, 2006

 

F-2



 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

 

To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders

Equity Residential

 

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting at Item 9A, that Equity Residential (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO Criteria”). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Equity Residential maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO Criteria. Also, in our opinion, Equity Residential maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the COSO Criteria.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Equity Residential as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 and our report dated February 28, 2006, except for the fourth paragraph of Note 21, for which the date is March 2, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

 

Ernst & Young LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

February 28, 2006

 

F-3



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in thousands except for share amounts)

 

 

 

December 31,
2005

 

December 31,
2004

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in real estate

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

$

2,848,601

 

$

2,183,818

 

Depreciable property

 

13,336,636

 

12,350,900

 

Construction in progress (including land)

 

405,133

 

317,903

 

Investment in real estate

 

16,590,370

 

14,852,621

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

(2,888,140

)

(2,599,827

)

Investment in real estate, net

 

13,702,230

 

12,252,794

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

88,828

 

83,505

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

6,838

 

11,461

 

Rents receivable

 

789

 

1,681

 

Deposits – restricted

 

77,093

 

82,194

 

Escrow deposits – mortgage

 

35,225

 

35,800

 

Deferred financing costs, net

 

40,636

 

34,986

 

Goodwill, net

 

30,000

 

30,000

 

Other assets

 

117,306

 

112,854

 

Total assets

 

$

14,098,945

 

$

12,645,275

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage notes payable

 

$

3,379,289

 

$

3,166,739

 

Notes, net

 

3,442,784

 

3,143,067

 

Lines of credit

 

769,000

 

150,000

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

108,855

 

87,422

 

Accrued interest payable

 

78,441

 

70,411

 

Rents received in advance and other liabilities

 

302,418

 

227,588

 

Security deposits

 

54,823

 

49,501

 

Distributions payable

 

145,812

 

142,437

 

Total liabilities

 

8,281,422

 

7,037,165

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

Minority Interests:

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Partnership

 

345,034

 

319,841

 

Preference Interests

 

60,000

 

206,000

 

Junior Preference Units

 

184

 

184

 

Partially Owned Properties

 

16,965

 

9,557

 

Total Minority Interests

 

422,183

 

535,582

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 3,323,830 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2005 and 4,108,658 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2004

 

504,096

 

636,216

 

Common Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 289,536,344 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2005 and 285,076,915 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2004

 

2,895

 

2,851

 

Paid in capital

 

5,253,188

 

5,112,311

 

Deferred compensation

 

—

 

(18

)

Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings

 

(350,367

)

(657,462

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(14,472

)

(21,370

)

Total shareholders’ equity

 

5,395,340

 

5,072,528

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

14,098,945

 

$

12,645,275

 

 

See accompanying notes

 

F-4



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Amounts in thousands except per share data)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

1,943,789

 

$

1,742,028

 

$

1,566,065

 

Fee and asset management

 

11,148

 

11,796

 

14,956

 

Total revenues

 

1,954,937

 

1,753,824

 

1,581,021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and maintenance

 

544,495

 

477,605

 

422,212

 

Real estate taxes and insurance

 

224,400

 

205,173

 

170,181

 

Property management

 

84,307

 

77,093

 

70,051

 

Fee and asset management

 

9,852

 

8,814

 

7,797

 

Depreciation

 

508,140

 

445,374

 

383,021

 

General and administrative

 

71,799

 

49,299

 

37,025

 

Impairment on technology investments

 

—

 

—

 

1,162

 

Total expenses

 

1,442,993

 

1,263,358

 

1,091,449

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

511,944

 

490,466

 

489,572

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other income

 

68,517

 

8,957

 

15,512

 

Interest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense incurred, net

 

(384,021

)

(328,289

)

(316,251

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

(6,570

)

(6,057

)

(5,440

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before allocation to Minority Interests, income (loss) from investments in unconsolidated entities, net gain on sales of unconsolidated entities and land parcels and discontinued operations

 

189,870

 

165,077

 

183,393

 

Allocation to Minority Interests:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Partnership

 

(58,514

)

(31,228

)

(34,658

)

Preference Interests

 

(7,591

)

(19,420

)

(20,211

)

Junior Preference Units

 

(15

)

(70

)

(325

)

Partially Owned Properties

 

801

 

1,787

 

271

 

Premium on redemption of Preference Interests

 

(4,134

)

(1,117

)

—

 

Income (loss) from investments in unconsolidated entities

 

470

 

(7,325

)

(10,118

)

Net gain on sales of unconsolidated entities

 

1,330

 

4,593

 

4,942

 

Net gain on sales of land parcels

 

30,245

 

5,482

 

—

 

Income from continuing operations

 

152,462

 

117,779

 

123,294

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations

 

697,655

 

318,443

 

310,706

 

Discontinued operations, net

 

11,676

 

36,107

 

89,311

 

Net income

 

861,793

 

472,329

 

523,311

 

Preferred distributions

 

(49,642

)

(53,746

)

(76,435

)

Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares

 

(4,359

)

—

 

(20,237

)

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

807,792

 

$

418,583

 

$

426,639

 

Earnings per share – basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations available to Common Shares

 

$

0.51

 

$

0.32

 

$

0.21

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

2.83

 

$

1.50

 

$

1.57

 

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding

 

285,760

 

279,744

 

272,337

 

Earnings per share – diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations available to Common Shares

 

$

0.51

 

$

0.31

 

$

0.21

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

2.79

 

$

1.48

 

$

1.55

 

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding

 

310,785

 

303,871

 

297,041

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distributions declared per Common Share outstanding

 

$

1.74

 

$

1.73

 

$

1.73

 

 

See accompanying notes

 

F-5



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)

(Amounts in thousands except per share data)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

861,793

 

$

472,329

 

$

523,311

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) – derivative and other instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the year

 

4,357

 

(3,707

)

11,467

 

Equity in unrealized holding gains arising during the year – unconsolidated entities

 

—

 

3,667

 

7,268

 

Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive income

 

2,541

 

2,071

 

1,653

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

868,691

 

$

474,360

 

$

543,699

 

 

See accompanying notes

 

F-6



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

861,793

 

$

472,329

 

$

523,311

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocation to Minority Interests:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Partnership

 

58,514

 

31,228

 

34,658

 

Preference Interests

 

7,591

 

19,420

 

20,211

 

Junior Preference Units

 

15

 

70

 

325

 

Partially Owned Properties

 

(801

)

(1,787

)

(271

)

Premium on redemption of Preference Interests

 

4,134

 

1,117

 

—

 

Depreciation

 

528,958

 

496,583

 

471,569

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

7,166

 

7,276

 

6,702

 

Amortization of discounts and premiums on debt

 

(3,502

)

(784

)

(991

)

Amortization of deferred settlements on derivative instruments

 

1,160

 

1,001

 

710

 

Impairment on technology investments

 

—

 

—

 

1,162

 

(Income) from technology investments

 

(57,054

)

—

 

—

 

(Income) loss from investments in unconsolidated entities

 

(470

)

7,325

 

10,118

 

Net (gain) on sales of unconsolidated entities

 

(1,330

)

(4,593

)

(4,942

)

Net (gain) on sales of land parcels

 

(30,245

)

(5,482

)

—

 

Net (gain) on sales of discontinued operations

 

(697,655

)

(318,443

)

(310,706

)

Loss on debt extinguishments

 

10,977

 

113

 

2,095

 

Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative instruments

 

10

 

249

 

(118

)

Compensation paid with Company Common Shares

 

35,905

 

16,826

 

14,883

 

Other operating activities, net

 

246

 

(178

)

(3,147

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease (increase) in rents receivable

 

918

 

(628

)

2,234

 

Decrease (increase) in deposits – restricted

 

5,829

 

(6,037

)

4,406

 

(Increase) in other assets

 

(22,690

)

(20,341

)

(18,940

)

Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

7,334

 

2,844

 

(4,682

)

Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable

 

8,171

 

9,176

 

(2,851

)

(Decrease) increase in rents received in advance and other liabilities

 

(15,952

)

7,655

 

(170

)

Increase (decrease) in security deposits

 

5,269

 

2,811

 

(1,247

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

714,291

 

717,750

 

744,319

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in real estate – acquisitions

 

(2,229,881

)

(820,029

)

(595,077

)

Investment in real estate – development/other

 

(179,962

)

(117,940

)

(8,386

)

Improvements to real estate

 

(232,500

)

(212,171

)

(181,948

)

Additions to non-real estate property

 

(17,610

)

(6,552

)

(2,928

)

Interest capitalized for real estate under development

 

(13,701

)

(11,687

)

—

 

Interest capitalized for unconsolidated entities under development

 

—

 

(2,282

)

(20,647

)

Proceeds from disposition of real estate, net

 

1,978,087

 

937,690

 

1,130,925

 

Proceeds from disposition of unconsolidated entities

 

3,533

 

7,940

 

14,136

 

Proceeds from refinancing of unconsolidated entities

 

—

 

—

 

6,708

 

Proceeds from technology and other investments

 

82,054

 

—

 

—

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

(1,480

)

(406,524

)

(14,038

)

Distributions from unconsolidated entities

 

3,194

 

26,553

 

20,515

 

(Increase) decrease in deposits on real estate acquisitions, net

 

(706

)

58,715

 

(22,656

)

Decrease in mortgage deposits

 

683

 

9,144

 

11,298

 

 

See accompanying notes

 

F-7



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES (continued):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidation of previously Unconsolidated Properties:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Via acquisition (net of cash acquired)

 

$

(62

)

$

(49,183

)

$

6,879

 

Via FIN 46 (cash consolidated)

 

—

 

3,628

 

—

 

Acquisition of Minority Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

(1,989

)

(72

)

(125

)

Other investing activities, net

 

2,379

 

16,802

 

(10,628

)

Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities

 

(607,961

)

(565,968

)

334,028

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan and bond acquisition costs

 

(12,816

)

(9,696

)

(6,127

)

Mortgage notes payable:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds

 

280,125

 

467,541

 

111,150

 

Lump sum payoffs

 

(442,786

)

(469,333

)

(401,951

)

Scheduled principal repayments

 

(27,607

)

(25,607

)

(30,919

)

Prepayment premiums/fees

 

(10,977

)

(450

)

(2,187

)

Notes, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds

 

499,435

 

898,014

 

398,816

 

Lump sum payoffs

 

(190,000

)

(531,390

)

(190,000

)

Scheduled principal repayments

 

(4,286

)

(4,286

)

(4,480

)

Lines of credit:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds

 

6,291,300

 

1,742,000

 

182,000

 

Repayments

 

(5,672,300

)

(1,602,000

)

(312,000

)

(Payments on) settlement of derivative instruments

 

(7,823

)

(7,346

)

(12,999

)

Proceeds from sale of Common Shares

 

8,285

 

6,853

 

6,324

 

Proceeds from sale of Preferred Shares

 

—

 

—

 

150,000

 

Proceeds from exercise of options

 

54,858

 

79,043

 

68,400

 

Redemption of Preferred Shares

 

(125,000

)

—

 

(386,989

)

Redemption of Preference Interests

 

(146,000

)

(40,000

)

—

 

Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares

 

(43

)

—

 

(8,345

)

Premium on redemption of Preference Interests

 

(322

)

—

 

—

 

Payment of offering costs

 

(26

)

(24

)

(5,304

)

Contributions – Minority Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

7,439

 

100

 

—

 

Distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shares

 

(496,004

)

(484,540

)

(472,211

)

Preferred Shares

 

(51,092

)

(54,350

)

(79,341

)

Preference Interests

 

(7,763

)

(19,464

)

(20,211

)

Junior Preference Units

 

(15

)

(148

)

(324

)

Minority Interests – Operating Partnership

 

(35,833

)

(36,446

)

(38,472

)

Minority Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

(11,756

)

(26,327

)

(3,473

)

Net cash (used for) financing activities

 

(101,007

)

(117,856

)

(1,058,643

)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

5,323

 

33,926

 

19,704

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

 

83,505

 

49,579

 

29,875

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 

$

88,828

 

$

83,505

 

$

49,579

 

 

See accompanying notes

 

F-8



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the year for interest

 

$

397,886

 

$

348,574

 

$

352,391

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid during the year for income, franchise and excise taxes

 

$

11,522

 

$

3,074

 

$

2,245

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate acquisitions/dispositions/other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage loans assumed

 

$

443,478

 

$

95,901

 

$

89,446

 

Valuation of OP Units issued

 

$

33,662

 

$

9,087

 

$

331

 

Mortgage loans (assumed) by purchaser

 

$

(35,031

)

$

(29,470

)

$

(53,250

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidation of previously Unconsolidated Properties – Via acquisition:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in real estate

 

$

(5,608

)

$

(960,331

)

$

(111,113

)

Mortgage loans assumed

 

$

2,839

 

$

274,818

 

$

51,625

 

Valuation of OP Units issued

 

$

—

 

$

—

 

$

4,231

 

Minority Interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

$

59

 

$

445

 

$

42

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

$

1,176

 

$

608,681

 

$

34,942

 

Net other liabilities recorded

 

$

1,472

 

$

27,204

 

$

27,152

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidation of previously unconsolidated properties – Via FIN 46:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in real estate

 

$

—

 

$

(548,342

)

$

—

 

Mortgage loans consolidated

 

$

—

 

$

294,722

 

$

—

 

Minority interests – Partially Owned Properties

 

$

—

 

$

3,074

 

$

—

 

Investments in unconsolidated entities

 

$

—

 

$

234,984

 

$

—

 

Net other liabilities recorded

 

$

—

 

$

19,190

 

$

—

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Refinancing of mortgage notes payable into notes, net

 

$

—

 

$

130,000

 

$

—

 

 

See accompanying notes

 

F-9



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PREFERRED SHARES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

636,216

 

$

670,913

 

$

946,157

 

Redemption of 9 1/8% Series B Cumulative Redeemable

 

(125,000

)

—

 

—

 

Conversion of 7.00% Series E Cumulative Convertible

 

(7,065

)

(34,519

)

(8,891

)

Conversion of 7.00% Series H Cumulative Convertible

 

(55

)

(178

)

(180

)

Conversion of 7.25% Series G Convertible Cumulative

 

—

 

—

 

(29,184

)

Redemption of 7.25% Series G Convertible Cumulative

 

—

 

—

 

(286,989

)

Redemption of 7.625% Series L Cumulative Redeemable

 

—

 

—

 

(100,000

)

Issuance of 6.48% Series N Cumulative Redeemable

 

—

 

—

 

150,000

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

504,096

 

$

636,216

 

$

670,913

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMMON SHARES, $0.01 PAR VALUE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

2,851

 

$

2,776

 

$

2,711

 

Conversion of Preferred Shares into Common Shares

 

3

 

16

 

14

 

Conversion of OP Units into Common Shares

 

11

 

17

 

7

 

Exercise of share options

 

22

 

34

 

32

 

Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)

 

3

 

3

 

3

 

Stock-based employee compensation expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted/performance shares

 

5

 

5

 

9

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

2,895

 

$

2,851

 

$

2,776

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PAID IN CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

5,112,311

 

$

4,956,712

 

$

4,844,104

 

Common Share Issuance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of Preferred Shares into Common Shares

 

7,117

 

34,681

 

38,241

 

Conversion of OP Units into Common Shares

 

24,185

 

36,903

 

10,896

 

Exercise of share options

 

54,836

 

79,009

 

68,368

 

Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)

 

8,282

 

6,850

 

6,321

 

Stock-based employee compensation expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance shares

 

7,697

 

224

 

334

 

Restricted shares

 

20,032

 

8,789

 

2,154

 

Share options

 

6,562

 

2,982

 

2,626

 

ESPP discount

 

1,591

 

1,290

 

1,196

 

Offering costs

 

(26

)

(24

)

(5,304

)

Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares – original issuance costs

 

4,316

 

—

 

11,892

 

Premium on redemption of Preference Interests – original issuance costs

 

3,812

 

1,117

 

—

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Savings Plan (SERP)

 

(4,177

)

(8,705

)

(24,661

)

Adjustment for Minority Interests ownership in Operating Partnership

 

6,650

 

(7,517

)

545

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

5,253,188

 

$

5,112,311

 

$

4,956,712

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes

 

F-10



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DEFERRED COMPENSATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

(18

)

$

(3,554

)

$

(12,118

)

Amortization to compensation expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance shares

 

—

 

88

 

1,150

 

Restricted shares

 

18

 

3,448

 

7,414

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

—

 

$

(18

)

$

(3,554

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DISTRIBUTIONS IN EXCESS OF ACCUMULATED EARNINGS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

(657,462

)

$

(588,005

)

$

(539,942

)

Net income

 

861,793

 

472,329

 

523,311

 

Common Share distributions

 

(500,697

)

(488,040

)

(474,702

)

Preferred Share distributions

 

(49,642

)

(53,746

)

(76,435

)

Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares – cash charge

 

(43

)

—

 

(8,345

)

Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares – original issuance costs

 

(4,316

)

—

 

(11,892

)

Balance, end of year

 

$

(350,367

)

$

(657,462

)

$

(588,005

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

(21,370

)

$

(23,401

)

$

(43,789

)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss – derivative and other instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the year

 

4,357

 

(3,707

)

11,467

 

Equity in unrealized holding gains arising during the year – unconsolidated entities

 

—

 

3,667

 

7,268

 

Losses reclassified into earnings from other comprehensive income

 

2,541

 

2,071

 

1,653

 

Balance, end of year

 

$

(14,472

)

$

(21,370

)

$

(23,401

)

 

See accompanying notes

 

F-11



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.                                      Business

 

Equity Residential (“EQR”), a Maryland real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in March 1993, is a fully integrated real estate company primarily engaged in the acquisition, development, ownership, management and operation of multifamily properties. In addition, EQR may acquire or develop multifamily properties specifically to convert directly into condominiums as well as upgrade and sell existing properties as individual condominiums. EQR may also acquire land parcels to hold and/or sell based on market opportunities. EQR has elected to be taxed as a REIT.

 

EQR is the general partner of, and as of December 31, 2005 owned an approximate 93.4% ownership interest in, ERP Operating Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT (“UPREIT”), under which all property ownership and business operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries. References to the “Company” include EQR, the Operating Partnership and each of the partnerships, limited liability companies and corporations controlled by the Operating Partnership and/or EQR.

 

As of December 31, 2005, the Company, directly or indirectly through investments in title holding entities, owned all or a portion of 926 properties in 31 states and the District of Columbia consisting of 197,404 units (table does not include various uncompleted development properties). The ownership breakdown includes:

 

 

 

Properties

 

Units

 

Wholly Owned Properties

 

834

 

175,501

 

Partially Owned Properties (Consolidated)

 

35

 

6,004

 

Unconsolidated Properties

 

57

 

15,899

 

 

 

926

 

197,404

 

 

The “Wholly Owned Properties” are accounted for under the consolidation method of accounting. The Company beneficially owns 100% fee simple title to 833 of the 834 Wholly Owned Properties. The Company owns the building and improvements and leases the land underlying the improvements under a long-term ground lease that expires in 2026 for one property. This one property is consolidated and reflected as a real estate asset while the ground lease is accounted for as an operating lease in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 13, Accounting for Leases.

 

The “Partially Owned Properties” are controlled by the Company but have partners with minority interests and are accounted for under the consolidation method of accounting. The “Unconsolidated Properties” are partially owned but not controlled by the Company. With the exception of one property, the Unconsolidated Properties consist of investments in partnership interests and/or subordinated mortgages that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The remaining one property consists of an investment in a limited liability company that, as a result of the terms of the operating agreement, is accounted for as a management contract right with all fees recognized as fee and asset management revenue.

 

2.                                      Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Presentation

 

Due to the Company’s ability as general partner to control either through ownership or by contract the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries, other than entities that own controlling interests in the Unconsolidated Properties and certain other entities in which the Company has investments, the Operating Partnership and each such subsidiary has been consolidated with the Company for financial reporting

 

F-12



 

purposes. Effective March 31, 2004, the consolidated financial statements also include all variable interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary.

 

The Company’s mergers and acquisitions were accounted for as purchases in accordance with either Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 16, Business Combinations, or SFAS No. 141,Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The fair value of the consideration given by the Company in the mergers were used as the valuation basis for each of the combinations. The accompanying consolidated statements of operations and cash flows include the results of the properties purchased through the mergers and through acquisitions from their respective closing dates.

 

Real Estate Assets and Depreciation of Investment in Real Estate

 

The Company allocates the purchase price of properties to net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired based on their fair values in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property, our own analysis of recently acquired and existing comparable properties in our portfolio, and other market data. The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired. The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired real estate to various components as follows:

 

•                    Land – Based on actual purchase price if acquired separately or market research/comparables if acquired with an operating property.

•                    Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment – Ranges between $1,500 and $3,000 per apartment unit acquired as an estimate of the fair value of the appliances & fixtures inside a unit. The per-unit amount applied depends on the type of apartment building acquired. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of five years.

•                    In-Place Leases – The Company considers the value of acquired in-place leases that meet the definition outlined in SFAS No. 141, paragraph 37. The amortization period is the average remaining term of each respective in-place acquired lease.

•                    Other Intangible Assets – The Company considers whether it has acquired other intangible assets that meet the definition outlined in SFAS No. 141, paragraph 39, including any customer relationship intangibles. The amortization period is the estimated useful life of the acquired intangible asset.

•                    Building – Based on the fair value determined on an “as-if vacant” basis. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of thirty years.

 

Replacements inside a unit such as appliances and carpeting are depreciated over a five-year estimated useful life. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as incurred and significant renovations and improvements that improve and/or extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized over their estimated useful life, generally five to ten years. Initial direct leasing costs are expensed as incurred as such expense approximates the deferral and amortization of initial direct leasing costs over the lease terms. Property sales or dispositions are recorded when title transfers to unrelated third parties, contingencies have been removed and sufficient cash consideration has been received by the Company. Upon disposition, the related costs and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts. Any gain or loss on sale is recognized in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

 

The Company classifies real estate assets as real estate held for disposition when it is certain a property will be disposed of in accordance with SFAS No. 144 (see further discussion below).

 

The Company classifies properties under development and/or expansion and properties in the lease up phase (including land) as construction in progress until construction has been completed and all

 

F-13



 

certificates of occupancy permits have been obtained.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Including Goodwill

 

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 prohibits the amortization of goodwill and requires that goodwill be reviewed for impairment at least annually. In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS Nos. 142 and 144 were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company adopted these standards effective January 1, 2002. See Notes 13 and 19 for further discussion.

 

The Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets, including its investments in real estate and goodwill, for indicators of permanent impairment. The judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on factors such as operational performance, market conditions, expected holding period of each asset and legal and environmental concerns. Future events could occur which would cause the Company to conclude that impairment indicators exist and an impairment loss is warranted.

 

For long-lived assets to be held and used, the Company compares the expected future undiscounted cash flows for the long-lived asset against the carrying amount of that asset. If the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, the Company further analyzes each individual asset for other temporary or permanent indicators of impairment. An impairment loss would be recorded for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying amount of the asset if the Company deems this difference to be permanent.

 

For long-lived assets to be disposed of, an impairment loss is recognized when the estimated fair value of the asset, less the estimated cost to sell, is less than the carrying amount of the asset measured at the time that the Company has determined it will sell the asset. Long-lived assets held for disposition and the related liabilities are separately reported at the lower of their carrying amounts or their estimated fair values, less their costs to sell, and are not depreciated after reclassification to real estate held for disposition.

 

Cost Capitalization

 

See the Real Estate Assets and Depreciation of Investment in Real Estate section for discussion of the policy with respect to capitalization vs. expensing of fixed asset/repair and maintenance costs. In addition, the Company capitalizes the payroll and associated costs of employees directly responsible for and who spend all of their time on the supervision of major capital and/or renovation projects. These costs are reflected on the balance sheet as an increase to depreciable property.

 

The Company follows the guidance in SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, for all development projects and uses its professional judgment in determining whether such costs meet the criteria for capitalization or must be expensed as incurred. The Company capitalizes interest, real estate taxes and insurance and payroll and associated costs for those individuals directly responsible for and who spend all of their time on development activities, with capitalization ceasing no later than 90 days following issuance of the certificate of occupancy. These costs are reflected on the balance sheet as construction in progress for each specific property. The Company expenses as incurred all payroll costs of on-site employees working directly at our properties, except as noted above on our development properties prior to certificate of occupancy issuance and on specific major renovation at selected properties when additional incremental employees are hired.

 

F-14



 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all demand deposits, money market accounts and investments in certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements purchased with a maturity of three months or less, at the date of purchase, to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions. The combined account balances at one or more institutions typically exceed the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance coverage, and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. The Company believes that the risk is not significant, as the Company does not anticipate the financial institutions’ non-performance.

 

Deferred Financing Costs

 

Deferred financing costs include fees and costs incurred to obtain the Company’s lines of credit and long-term financings. These costs are amortized over the terms of the related debt. Unamortized financing costs are written-off when debt is retired before the maturity date. The accumulated amortization of such deferred financing costs was $18.3 million and $18.1 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Including Derivative Instruments

 

The valuation of financial instruments under SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, and SFAS No. 133 and its amendments (SFAS Nos. 137/138/149), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments. The Company, where possible, bases the fair values of its financial instruments, including its derivative instruments, on listed market prices and third party quotes. Where these are not available, the Company bases its estimates on current instruments with similar terms and maturities or on other factors relevant to the financial instruments.

 

In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes. The Company limits these risks by following established risk management policies and procedures including the use of derivatives to hedge interest rate risk on debt instruments.

 

The Company has a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors. When viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivatives are designed to hedge, the Company has not sustained a material loss from those instruments nor does it anticipate any material adverse effect on its net income or financial position in the future from the use of derivatives.

 

On January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133 and its amendments (SFAS Nos. 137/138/149), which requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and to measure those instruments at fair value. Additionally, the fair value adjustments will affect either shareholders’ equity or net income depending on whether the derivative instruments qualify as a hedge for accounting purposes and, if so, the nature of the hedging activity. When the terms of an underlying transaction are modified, or when the underlying transaction is terminated or completed, all changes in the fair value of the instrument are marked-to-market with changes in value included in net income each period until the instrument matures. Any derivative instrument used for risk management that does not meet the hedging criteria of SFAS No. 133 is marked-to-market each period. The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

 

The fair value of the Company’s mortgage notes payable and unsecured notes were both approximately $3.6 billion at December 31, 2005. The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, other than mortgage notes payable, unsecured notes and derivative instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, lines of credit and other financial instruments, approximate their carrying or contract values. See Note 11 for further discussion of derivative instruments.

 

F-15



 

Revenue Recognition

 

Rental income attributable to leases is recorded when due from residents and is recognized monthly as it is earned, which is not materially different than on a straight-line basis. Leases entered into between a resident and a property, for the rental of an apartment unit, are generally year-to-year, renewable upon consent of both parties on an annual or monthly basis. Fee and asset management revenue and interest income are recorded on an accrual basis.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company elected to account for its stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and its amendment (SFAS No. 148), Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, effective in the first quarter of 2003, which resulted in compensation expense being recorded based on the fair value of the stock compensation granted.

 

The Company elected the “Prospective Method” which requires expensing of employee awards granted or modified after January 1, 2003. Compensation expense under all of the Company’s plans is generally recognized over periods ranging from three months to five years.

 

The Company will adopt SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, as required effective January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123(R) will require all companies to expense stock-based compensation (such as stock options), as well as making other revisions to SFAS No. 123. As the Company began expensing all stock-based compensation effective January 1, 2003, the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will not have a material effect on its consolidated statements of operations or financial position.

 

The cost related to stock-based employee compensation included in the determination of net income for the year ended December 31, 2005 is equal to that which would have been recognized if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards since the original effective date of SFAS No. 123. The cost related to stock-based employee compensation included in the determination of net income for the years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 is less than that which would have been recognized if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards since the original effective date of SFAS No. 123. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 (amounts in thousands except per share amounts):

 

F-16



 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

Net income available to Common Shares — as reported

 

$

418,583

 

$

426,639

 

Add:  Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income:

 

 

 

 

 

Performance shares

 

312

 

1,466

 

Restricted shares

 

12,242

 

9,577

 

Share options (1)

 

2,982

 

2,626

 

ESPP discount

 

1,290

 

1,196

 

Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards:

 

 

 

 

 

Performance shares

 

(312

)

(1,466

)

Restricted shares

 

(12,242

)

(9,577

)

Share options (1)

 

(5,385

)

(6,784

)

ESPP discount

 

(1,290

)

(1,196

)

Net income available to Common Shares — pro forma

 

$

416,180

 

$

422,481

 

Earnings per share:

 

 

 

 

 

Basic – as reported

 

$

1.50

 

$

1.57

 

Basic – pro forma

 

$

1.49

 

$

1.55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted – as reported

 

$

1.48

 

$

1.55

 

Diluted – pro forma

 

$

1.47

 

$

1.54

 

 


(1)       Share options for the year ended December 31, 2003 included $1.4 million of expense recognition related to options granted in the first quarter of 2003 to the Company’s former chief executive officer. These options vested immediately upon grant.

 

The fair value of the option grants as computed under SFAS No. 123 would be recognized over the vesting period of the options. The fair value for the Company’s share options was estimated at the time the share options were granted using the Black Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

Risk-free interest rate

 

3.81%

 

3.03%

 

3.02%

 

Expected dividend yield

 

6.37%

 

6.52%

 

6.46%

 

Volatility

 

18.2%

 

20.0%

 

20.8%

 

Expected life of the options

 

6 years

 

5 years

 

5 years

 

Fair value of options granted

 

$2.64

 

$2.26

 

$1.90

 

 

The valuation method and assumptions are the same as those the Company used in accounting for option expense in its consolidated financial statements. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. This model is only one method of valuing options and the Company’s use of this model should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its accuracy. Because the Company’s share options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its share options and the actual value of the options may be significantly different.

 

F-17



 

Income Taxes

 

Due to the structure of the Company as a REIT and the nature of the operations of its operating properties, no provision for federal income taxes has been made at the EQR level. Historically, the Company has generally only incurred certain state and local income, excise and franchise taxes. The Company has elected Taxable REIT Subsidiary (“TRS”) status for certain of its corporate subsidiaries, primarily those entities engaged in condominium conversion and sale activities.

 

The Company provided for current income, franchise and excise taxes allocated as follows in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative (1)

 

$

4,442

 

$

3,008

 

$

2,582

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations (2)

 

8,750

 

—

 

—

 

Discontinued operations, net (3)

 

361

 

341

 

—

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for income, franchise and excise taxes

 

$

13,553

 

$

3,349

 

$

2,582

 

 


(1)          Primarily includes state and local income, excise and franchise taxes. In 2005, also includes $2.0 million of federal income taxes related to the sale of land parcels owned by a TRS and included in income from continuing operations.

(2)          Primarily represents federal income taxes incurred on the gains on sales of condominium units owned by a TRS.

(3)          Primarily represents state and local income, excise and franchise taxes on operating properties sold and included in discontinued operations.

 

The Company utilized approximately $43.9 million of net operating losses (“NOL”) during the year ended December 31, 2005 and has no NOL carryforwards available as of January 1, 2006.

 

During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company’s tax treatment of dividends and distributions were as follows:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

Tax treatment of dividends and distributions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ordinary dividends

 

$

0.902

 

$

1.104

 

$

0.799

 

Qualified dividends

 

0.070

 

0.003

 

0.009

 

Pre-May 6, 2003 long-term capital gain

 

—

 

—

 

0.150

 

Post-May 5, 2003 long-term capital gain

 

0.669

 

0.432

 

0.315

 

Unrecaptured section 1250 gain

 

0.099

 

0.151

 

0.251

 

Nontaxable distributions

 

—

 

0.040

 

0.206

 

Dividends and distributions declared per Common Share outstanding

 

$

1.740

 

$

1.730

 

$

1.730

 

 

The aggregate cost of land and depreciable property for federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 was approximately $9.4 billion and $9.3 billion, respectively.

 

F-18



 

Minority Interests

 

Operating Partnership: Net income is allocated to minority interests based on their respective ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership. The ownership percentage is calculated by dividing the number of units of limited partnership interest (“OP Units”) held by the minority interests by the total OP Units held by the minority interests and EQR. Issuance of additional common shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share (the “Common Shares”), and OP Units changes the ownership interests of both the minority interests and EQR. Such transactions and the proceeds therefrom are treated as capital transactions.

 

Partially Owned Properties: The Company reflects minority interests in partially owned properties on the balance sheet for the portion of properties consolidated by the Company that are not wholly owned by the Company. The earnings or losses from those properties attributable to the minority interests are reflected as minority interests in partially owned properties in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

Use of Estimates

 

In preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

Reclassifications

 

Certain reclassifications considered necessary for a fair presentation have been made to the prior period financial statements in order to conform to the current year presentation. These reclassifications have not changed the results of operations or shareholders’ equity.

 

Other

 

The Company adopted FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as required, effective March 31, 2004. The adoption required the consolidation of all previously unconsolidated development projects. FIN No. 46 requires the Company to consolidate the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the activities of a variable interest entity, which for the Company includes only its development partnerships, if the Company is entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns and/or is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from such entity’s activities. Due to the March 31, 2004 effective date, the Company has only consolidated the results of operations beginning April 1, 2004. The adoption of FIN No. 46 did not have any effect on net income as the aggregate results of operations of these development properties were previously included in income (loss) from investments in unconsolidated entities.

 

The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 150 and FSP No. FAS 150-3, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, effective December 31, 2003. SFAS No. 150 and FSP No. FAS 150-3 require the Company to make certain disclosures regarding noncontrolling interests that are classified as equity in the financial statements of a subsidiary but would be classified as a liability in the parent’s financial statements under SFAS No. 150 (e.g., minority interests in consolidated limited-life subsidiaries). The Company is presently the controlling partner in various consolidated partnerships consisting of 35 properties and 6,004 units and various uncompleted development properties having a minority interest book value of $17.0 million at December 31, 2005. Some of these partnerships contain provisions that require the partnerships to be liquidated through the sale of its assets upon reaching a date specified in each respective partnership agreement. The Company, as controlling partner, has an obligation to cause the property owning partnerships to distribute proceeds of liquidation to the Minority Interests in these Partially Owned Properties only to the extent that the net proceeds received by the partnerships from the

 

F-19



 

sale of its assets warrant a distribution based on the partnership agreements. As of December 31, 2005, the Company estimates the value of Minority Interest distributions would have been approximately $73.4 million (“Settlement Value”) had the partnerships been liquidated. This Settlement Value is based on estimated third party consideration realized by the partnerships upon disposition of the Partially Owned Properties and is net of all other assets and liabilities, including yield maintenance on the mortgages encumbering the properties, that would have been due on December 31, 2005 had those mortgages been prepaid. Due to, among other things, the inherent uncertainty in the sale of real estate assets, the amount of any potential distribution to the Minority Interests in the Company’s Partially Owned Properties is subject to change. To the extent that the partnerships’ underlying assets are worth less than the underlying liabilities, the Company has no obligation to remit any consideration to the Minority Interests in Partially Owned Properties.

 

In June 2005, the FASB ratified the consensus in EITF Issue No. 04-5, Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights (“Issue 04-5”), which provides guidance in determining whether a general partner controls a limited partnership. Issue 04-5 states that the general partner in a limited partnership is presumed to control that limited partnership. The presumption may be overcome if the limited partners have either (1) the substantive ability to dissolve the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partner without cause or (2) substantive participating rights, which provide the limited partners with the ability to effectively participate in significant decisions that would be expected to be made in the ordinary course of the limited partnership’s business and thereby preclude the general partner from exercising unilateral control over the partnership. The adoption of Issue 04-5 by the Company is required for new or modified limited partnership arrangements effective June 30, 2005 and existing limited partnership arrangements effective January 1, 2006. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company will consolidate its Lexford syndicated portfolio consisting of 20 separate partnerships (10 properties) containing 1,272 units representing approximately $20.0 million of both net investment in real estate and mortgage notes payable at December 31, 2005. The adoption is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations or financial position nor is it expected to have any effect on net equity or net income as the aggregate results of the aforementioned Lexford syndicated portfolio is already included in investments in unconsolidated entities and income (loss) from investments in unconsolidated entities, respectively.

 

In March 2005, the FASB issued FIN No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of SFAS No. 143,Asset Retirement Obligations. A conditional asset retirement obligation refers to a legal obligation to retire assets where the timing and/or method of settlement are conditioned on future events. FIN No. 47 requires an entity to recognize a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN No. 47 for the year ended December 31, 2005. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

3.                                      Shareholders’ Equity and Minority Interests

 

The following tables present the changes in the Company’s issued and outstanding Common Shares and OP Units for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

 

F-20



 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shares outstanding at January 1,

 

285,076,915

 

277,643,885

 

271,095,481

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shares Issued:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion of Series E Preferred Shares

 

314,485

 

1,536,501

 

395,723

 

Conversion of Series G Preferred Shares

 

—

 

—

 

996,459

 

Conversion of Series H Preferred Shares

 

3,182

 

10,268

 

10,424

 

Employee Share Purchase Plan

 

286,751

 

275,616

 

289,274

 

Exercise of options

 

2,248,744

 

3,350,759

 

3,249,555

 

Restricted share grants, net

 

520,821

 

515,622

 

900,555

 

Conversion of OP Units

 

1,085,446

 

1,744,463

 

706,631

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shares Other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Shares other

 

—

 

(199

)

(217

)

Common Shares outstanding at December 31,

 

289,536,344

 

285,076,915

 

277,643,885

 

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OP Units outstanding at January 1,

 

20,552,940

 

21,907,732

 

22,300,643

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OP Units Issued:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions/consolidations

 

956,751

 

306,694

 

165,628

 

Conversion of Series A Junior Preference Units

 

—

 

82,977

 

148,092

 

Conversion of OP Units to Common Shares

 

(1,085,446

)

(1,744,463

)

(706,631

)

OP Units Outstanding at December 31,

 

20,424,245

 

20,552,940

 

21,907,732

 

Total Common Shares and OP Units Outstanding at December 31,

 

309,960,589

 

305,629,855

 

299,551,617

 

OP Units Ownership Interest in Operating Partnership

 

6.6

%

6.7

%

7.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OP Units Issued:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions/consolidations – per unit

 

$

35.18

 

$

29.63

 

$

27.54

 

Acquisitions/consolidations – valuation

 

$

33.7 million

 

$

9.1 million

 

$

4.6 million

 

Conversion of Series A Junior Preference Units – per unit

 

—

 

$

24.50

 

$

24.50

 

Conversion of Series A Junior Preference Units – valuation

 

—

 

$

2.0 million

 

$

3.6 million

 

 

In February 1998, the Company filed and the SEC declared effective a Form S-3 Registration Statement to register $1.0 billion of equity securities. In addition, the Company carried over $272.4 million related to a prior registration statement. As of February 1, 2006, $956.5 million in equity securities remained available for issuance under this registration statement.

 

The equity positions of various individuals and entities that contributed their properties to the Operating Partnership in exchange for OP Units are collectively referred to as the “Minority Interests – Operating Partnership”. Subject to certain restrictions, the Minority Interests – Operating Partnership may exchange their OP Units for EQR Common Shares on a one-for-one basis.

 

Net proceeds from the Company’s Common Share and Preferred Share (see definition below) offerings are contributed by the Company to the Operating Partnership. In return for those contributions, EQR receives a number of OP Units in the Operating Partnership equal to the number of Common Shares it has issued in the equity offering (or in the case of a preferred equity offering, a number of preference units in the Operating Partnership equal in number and having the same terms as the Preferred Shares issued in the equity offering). As a result, the net offering proceeds from Common Shares and Preferred Shares are allocated between shareholders’ equity and Minority Interests – Operating Partnership to account for the change in their respective percentage ownership of the underlying equity of the Operating Partnership.

 

The Company’s declaration of trust authorizes the Company to issue up to 100,000,000 preferred shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per share (the “Preferred Shares”), with specific rights,

 

F-21



 

preferences and other attributes as the Board of Trustees may determine, which may include preferences, powers and rights that are senior to the rights of holders of the Company’s Common Shares.

 

The following table presents the Company’s issued and outstanding Preferred Shares as of December 31, 2005 and 2004:

 

 

 

Redemption
Date (1) (2)

 

Conversion
Rate (2)

 

Annual
Dividend
Rate per
Share (3)

 

Amounts in thousands

 

December

 

December

31, 2005

 

31, 2004

Preferred Shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9 1/8% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred; liquidation value $250 per share; 0 and 500,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively

 

10/15/05

 

N/A

 

 

(5)

$

—

 

$

125,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9 1/8% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred; liquidation value $250 per share; 460,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (4)

 

9/9/06

 

N/A

 

$

22.8125

 

115,000

 

115,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.60% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred; liquidation value $250 per share; 700,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (4)

 

7/15/07

 

N/A

 

$

21.50

 

175,000

 

175,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.00% Series E Cumulative Convertible Preferred; liquidation value $25 per share; 529,096 and 811,724 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively

 

11/1/98

 

1.1128

 

$

1.75

 

13,228

 

20,293

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.00% Series H Cumulative Convertible Preferred; liquidation value $25 per share; 34,734 and 36,934 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively

 

6/30/98

 

1.4480

 

$

1.75

 

868

 

923

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.29% Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred; liquidation value $50 per share; 1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004

 

12/10/26

 

N/A

 

$

4.145

 

50,000

 

50,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.48% Series N Cumulative Redeemable Preferred; liquidation value $250 per share; 600,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (4)

 

6/19/08

 

N/A

 

$

16.20

 

150,000

 

150,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

504,096

 

$

636,216

 

 


(1)               On or after the redemption date, redeemable preferred shares (Series C, D, K and N) may be redeemed for cash at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation price per share, plus accrued and unpaid distributions, if any.

 

(2)               On or after the redemption date, convertible preferred shares (Series E & H) may be redeemed under certain circumstances at the option of the Company for cash (in the case of Series E) or Common Shares (in the case of Series H), in whole or in part, at various redemption prices per share based upon the contractual conversion rate, plus accrued and unpaid distributions, if any.

 

(3)               Dividends on all series of Preferred Shares are payable quarterly at various pay dates. Dividend rates listed for Series C, D and N are Preferred Share rates and the equivalent Depositary Share annual dividend rates are $2.28125, $2.15 and $1.62, respectively.

 

(4)               Series C, D and N Preferred Shares each have a corresponding depositary share that consists of ten times the number of shares and one-tenth the liquidation value and dividend rate per share.

 

(5)               During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company redeemed for cash all 500,000 shares of its Series B Preferred Shares with a liquidation value of $125.0 million. Additionally, the Company recorded the write-off of approximately $4.3 million in original issuance costs as a premium on redemption of Preferred Shares in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

 

On June 19, 2003, the Company redeemed all of its outstanding Series L Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares at liquidation value for total cash consideration of $100.0 million. The Company did not

 

F-22



 

incur any original issuance costs as these shares were issued by Merry Land & Investment Company, Inc. prior to its merger with the Company.

 

On June 19, 2003, the Company issued 600,000 Series N Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares in a public offering. The Company received $145.3 million in net proceeds from this offering after payment of the underwriters’ fee.

 

On December 26, 2003, the Company redeemed the remaining outstanding Series G Convertible Cumulative Preferred Shares for cash consideration of $295.3 million, which included the liquidation value of $287.0 million and a cash redemption premium of $8.3 million. The Company recorded the $8.3 million cash redemption premium along with the write-off of $11.9 million in original issuance costs as a premium on redemption of Preferred Shares in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

 

The following table presents the issued and outstanding Preference Interests as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:

 

 

 

Redemption
Date (1)(2)

 

Conversion
Rate (2)

 

Annual
Dividend
Rate per
Unit (3)

 

Amounts in thousands

 

December

 

December

31, 2005

 

31, 2004

Preference Interests:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.50% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $50 per unit; 0 and 1,100,000 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively

 

03/03/05

 

N/A

 

 

(4)

$

—

 

$

55,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.50% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $50 per unit; 0 and 220,000 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively

 

03/23/05

 

N/A

 

 

(4)

—

 

11,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $50 per unit; 0 and 420,000 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively

 

05/01/05

 

N/A

 

 

(4)

—

 

21,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.50% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $50 per unit; 0 and 1,000,000 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively

 

08/11/05

 

N/A

 

 

(4)

—

 

50,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.375% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $50 per unit; 0 and 180,000 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively

 

05/01/05

 

N/A

 

 

(4)

—

 

9,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.875% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $50 per unit; 510,000 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (5)

 

03/21/06

 

N/A

 

$

3.9375

 

25,500

 

25,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.625% Series H Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $50 per unit; 190,000 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (5)

 

03/23/06 22003

 

1.5108

 

$

3.8125

 

9,500

 

9,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.625% Series I Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $50 per unit; 270,000 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004

 

06/22/06

 

1.4542

 

$

3.8125

 

13,500

 

13,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.625% Series J Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Preference Units; liquidation value $50 per unit; 230,000 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004

 

12/14/06

 

1.4108

 

$

3.8125

 

11,500

 

11,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

60,000

 

$

206,000

 

 


(1)          On or after the fifth anniversary of the respective issuance (the “Redemption Date”), all of the Preference Interests may be redeemed for cash at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation preference of $50.00 per unit plus the cumulative amount of accrued and unpaid distributions, if any.

 

F-23



 

(2)          On or after the tenth anniversary of the respective issuance (the “Conversion Date”), all of the Preference Interests are exchangeable at the option of the holder (in whole but not in part) on a one-for-one basis for a respective reserved series of EQR Preferred Shares. In addition, on or after the Conversion Date, the convertible Preference Interests (Series H, I & J) may be converted under certain circumstances at the option of the holder (in whole but not in part) to Common Shares based upon the contractual conversion rate, plus accrued and unpaid distributions, if any. Prior to the Conversion Date, the convertible Preference Interests (Series H, I, & J) may be converted at the option of the holder (in whole but not in part) to Common Shares based upon the contractual conversion rate, plus accrued and unpaid distributions, if any, if the issuer has called the series for redemption (the “Accelerated Conversion Right”).

 

(3)          Dividends on all series of Preference Interests are payable quarterly on March 25th, June 25th, September 25th,and December 25th of each year.

 

(4)          During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company redeemed or repurchased for cash all of its Series B through F Preference Interests with a liquidation value of $146.0 million. The Company recorded approximately $4.1 million as premiums on redemption of Preference Interests (Minority Interests) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, which included $3.8 million in original issuance costs and $0.3 million in cash redemption charges.

 

(5)          On February 10, 2006, the Company issued irrevocable notices to redeem for cash all 510,000 units of the Series G Preference Interests on March 21, 2006 and all 190,000 units of the Series H Preference Interests on March 23, 2006. The redemption notice on the Series H Preference Interests triggered the Accelerated Conversion Right (see above).

 

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company redeemed for cash all 800,000 units of its 8.00% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preference Interests with a liquidation value of $40.0 million. The Company recorded approximately $1.1 million as premiums on redemption of Preference Interests (Minority Interests) in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

 

The following table presents the Operating Partnership’s issued and outstanding Junior Convertible Preference Units (the “Junior Preference Units”) as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual

 

 

 

 

 

Redemption
Date (2)

 

Conversion
Rate (2)

 

Dividend
Rate per
Unit (1)

 

Amounts in thousands

 

December

 

December

31, 2005

 

31, 2004

Junior Preference Units:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series B Junior Convertible Preference Units; liquidation value $25 per unit; 7,367 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004

 

07/29/09

 

 

(2)

$

2.00

 

$

184

 

$

184

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

184

 

$

184

 

 


(1)          Dividends on the Junior Preference Units are payable quarterly at various pay dates.

 

(2)          On or after the tenth anniversary of the issuance (the “Redemption Date”), the Series B Junior Preference Units may be converted into OP Units at the option of the Operating Partnership based on the contractual conversion rate. Prior to the Redemption Date, the holders may elect to convert the Series B Junior Preference Units to OP Units under certain circumstances based on the contractual conversion rate. The contractual rate is based upon a ratio dependent upon the closing price of EQR’s Common Shares.

 

4.                                      Real Estate

 

The following table summarizes the carrying amounts for investment in real estate (at cost) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 (Amounts in thousands):

 

F-24



 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

Land

 

$

2,848,601

 

$

2,183,818

 

Buildings and Improvements

 

12,583,020

 

11,667,787

 

Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment

 

753,616

 

683,113

 

Construction in Progress (excluding land)

 

166,639

 

160,986

 

Construction in Progress (land)

 

238,494

 

156,917

 

Real Estate

 

16,590,370

 

14,852,621

 

Accumulated Depreciation

 

(2,888,140

)

(2,599,827

)

Real Estate, net

 

$

13,702,230

 

$

12,252,794

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company acquired the entire equity interest in forty-one properties containing 12,059 units, inclusive of one additional unit at one existing property, and seven land parcels from unaffiliated parties for a total purchase price of $2.7 billion.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company also acquired a majority interest in the remaining equity interests it did not previously own in sixteen Partially Owned Properties, all of which remain partially owned. The acquisitions were funded using $24.2 million in cash and through the issuance of 614,717 OP Units valued at $20.8 million, with $43.0 million recorded as additional building basis and $2.0 million recorded as a reduction of Minority Interests – Partially Owned Properties. The Company also acquired the majority of the remaining third party equity interests it did not previously own in three properties, consisting of 211 units. The properties were previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting and subsequent to each purchase were consolidated. The Company recorded $5.6 million in investment in real estate and the following:

 

•                    Assumed $2.8 million in mortgage debt;

•                    Reduced investments in unconsolidated entities by $1.2 million;

•                    Assumed $1.5 million of other liabilities net of other assets acquired; and

•                    Paid cash of $0.1 million (net of cash acquired).

 

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company acquired the entire equity interest in twenty-four properties containing 6,182 units from unaffiliated parties, inclusive of four additional units at two existing properties and one land parcel, for a total purchase price of $913.2 million.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company also acquired a majority interest in the remaining equity interests it did not previously own in nineteen properties and two land parcels. These properties were previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting and subsequent to each purchase were consolidated. The Company recorded $960.3 million in investment in real estate and the following:

 

•                    Assumed $274.8 million in mortgage debt;

•                    Recorded $0.4 million of minority interests in partially owned properties;

•                    Reduced investments in unconsolidated entities by $608.7 million (inclusive of $339.7 million in mortgage debt paid off prior to closing);

•                    Assumed $27.2 million of other liabilities net of other assets acquired; and

•                    Paid cash of $49.2 million (net of cash acquired).

 

As previously noted, the Company adopted FIN No. 46, as required, effective March 31, 2004. The adoption required the consolidation of all previously unconsolidated development projects. Accordingly, the Company consolidated five completed properties, six projects which were under development at the time and various other land parcels held for future development. The Company recorded $548.3 million in investment in real estate and the following:

 

•                    Consolidated $294.7 million in mortgage debt;

 

F-25



 

•                    Recorded $3.0 million of minority interests in partially owned properties;

•                    Reduced investments in unconsolidated entities by $235.0 million;

•                    Consolidated $19.2 million of other liabilities net of other assets acquired; and

•                    Consolidated $3.6 million of cash.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company disposed of the following to unaffiliated parties (including five land parcels) (sales price in thousands):

 

 

 

Properties

 

Units

 

Sales Price

 

Rental Properties

 

50

 

12,848

 

$

1,351,636

 

Condominium Units

 

6

 

2,241

 

593,305

 

Land Parcels

 

—

 

—

 

108,280

 

 

 

56

 

15,089

 

$

2,053,221

 

 

The Company recognized a net gain on sales of discontinued operations of approximately $697.7 million (amount is net of $8.8 million of income taxes incurred on condominium sales – see additional discussion in Note 2) and a net gain on sales of land parcels of approximately $30.2 million on the above sales.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company disposed of the following to unaffiliated parties (including two land parcels) (sales price in thousands):

 

 

 

Properties

 

Units

 

Sales Price

 

Rental Properties

 

56

 

14,159

 

$

787,804

 

Condominium Units

 

2

 

977

 

177,353

 

Land Parcels

 

—

 

—

 

27,855

 

 

 

58

 

15,136

 

$

993,012

 

 

The Company recognized a net gain on sales of discontinued operations of approximately $318.4 million, a net gain on sales of unconsolidated entities of approximately $4.6 million, and a net gain on sales of land parcels of approximately $5.5 million on the above sales.

 

5.                                      Commitments to Acquire/Dispose of Real Estate

 

As of February 1, 2006, in addition to the properties that were subsequently acquired as discussed in Note 21, the Company had entered into separate agreements to acquire the following (purchase price in thousands):

 

 

 

Properties/
Parcels

 

Units

 

Purchase
Price

 

Operating Properties

 

7

 

1,768

 

$

284,000

 

Land Parcels

 

4

 

—

 

84,852

 

Total

 

11

 

1,768

 

$

368,852

 

 

As of February 1, 2006, in addition to the properties that were subsequently disposed of as discussed in Note 21, the Company had entered into separate agreements to dispose of the following (sales price in thousands):

 

F-26



 

 

 

Properties/
Parcels

 

Units

 

Sales Price

 

Operating Properties

 

22

 

6,906

 

$

596,119

 

Development Properties

 

1

 

278

 

116,000

 

Land Parcels

 

3

 

—

 

90,910

 

Total

 

26

 

7,184

 

$

803,029

 

 

The closings of these pending transactions are subject to certain contingencies and conditions, therefore, there can be no assurance that these transactions will be consummated or that the final terms thereof will not differ in material respects from those summarized in the preceding paragraphs.

 

6.                                      Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

 

The Company has co-invested in various properties with unrelated third parties which are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.  The following table summarizes the Company’s investments in unconsolidated entities as of December 31, 2005 (amounts in thousands except for project and unit amounts):

 

 

 

Institutional
Joint
Ventures

 

Lexford/
Other

 

Totals

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total projects

 

45

 

11

 

56

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total units

 

10,846

 

1,360

 

12,206

(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company’s ownership percentage

 

25.0

%

11.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company’s share of outstanding debt (2)

 

$

121,200

 

$

2,602

 

$

123,802

 

 


(1)          Totals exclude Fort Lewis Military Housing consisting of one property and 3,693 units, which is not accounted for under the equity method of accounting, but is included in the Company’s property/unit counts at December 31, 2005.

 

(2)          All debt is non-recourse to the Company.

 

7.                                      Deposits - - Restricted

 

The following table presents the deposits – restricted as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 (amounts in thousands):

 

 

 

December
31, 2005

 

December
31, 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collateral enhancement for partially owned development loans

 

$

—

 

$

12,000

 

Tax–deferred (1031) exchange proceeds

 

853

 

—

 

Earnest money on pending acquisitions

 

15,120

 

3,267

 

Resident security, utility and other

 

61,120

 

66,927

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totals

 

$

77,093

 

$

82,194

 

 

F-27



 

8.                                      Mortgage Notes Payable

 

As of December 31, 2005, the Company had outstanding mortgage indebtedness of approximately $3.4 billion.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company:

 

•                  Repaid $470.4 million of mortgage loans;

•                  Assumed/consolidated $446.3 million of mortgage debt on certain properties in connection with their acquisitions and/or consolidations;

•                  Obtained $280.1 million of mortgage loans on certain properties; and

•                  Was released from $35.0 million of mortgage debt assumed by the purchaser on disposed properties.

 

As of December 31, 2005, scheduled maturities for the Company’s outstanding mortgage indebtedness were at various dates through February 1, 2041.  At December 31, 2005, the interest rate range on the Company’s mortgage debt was 3.35% to 12.465%.  During the year ended December 31, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s mortgage debt was 5.63%.

 

The historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation, of encumbered properties was $4.8 billion and $4.4 billion at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

Aggregate payments of principal on mortgage notes payable for each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

Year

 

Total

 

2006

 

$

354,521

 

2007

 

234,965

 

2008

 

490,882

 

2009

 

566,651

 

2010

 

263,963

 

Thereafter

 

1,468,307

 

Total

 

$

3,379,289

 

 

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had outstanding mortgage indebtedness of approximately $3.2 billion.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company:

 

•                  Repaid $494.9 million of mortgage loans;

•                  Assumed $665.4 million of mortgage debt on certain properties in connection with their acquisitions and/or consolidations;

•                  Obtained $467.5 million of mortgage loans on certain properties;

•                  Was released from $29.5 million of mortgage debt assumed by the purchaser on disposed properties; and

•                  Refinanced $130.0 million of mortgage notes and obtained the release of the property as collateral for the loan; therefore the loan was reclassified to notes, net.

 

As of December 31, 2004, scheduled maturities for the Company’s outstanding mortgage indebtedness were at various dates through January 1, 2035.  At December 31, 2004, the interest rate range on the Company’s mortgage debt was 1.89% to 12.465%.  During the year ended December 31, 2004, the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s mortgage debt was 5.46%.

 

F-28



 

9.                                      Notes

 

The following tables summarize the Company’s unsecured note balances and certain interest rate and maturity date information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively:

 

December 31, 2005
(Amounts are in thousands)

 

Net Principal
Balance

 

Interest
Rate Ranges

 

Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 

Maturity
Date Ranges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Rate Public Notes

 

$

3,331,394

 

4.75% - 7.625%

 

6.13

%

2006 - 2026

 

Fixed Rate Tax-Exempt Bonds

 

111,390

 

4.75% - 5.20%

 

5.06

%

2028 - 2029

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totals

 

$

3,442,784

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2004
(Amounts are in thousands)

 

Net Principal
Balance

 

InterestRate
Ranges

 

Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 

Maturity
Date Ranges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Rate Public Notes

 

$

3,031,677

 

4.75% - 7.75%

 

6.25

%

2005 - 2026

 

Fixed Rate Tax-Exempt Bonds

 

111,390

 

4.75% - 5.20%

 

5.07

%

2028 - 2029

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Totals

 

$

3,143,067

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Company’s unsecured public debt contains certain financial and operating covenants including, amoung other things, maintenance of certain financial ratios.  The Company was in compliance with its unsecured public debt covenants for both the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.

 

In June 2003, the Operating Partnership filed and the SEC declared effective a Form S-3 registration statement to register $2.0 billion of debt securities.  In addition, the Operating Partnership carried over $280.0 million related to a prior registration statement.  As of February 1, 2006, $580.0 million in debt securities remained available for issuance under this registration statement.

 

In January 2006, the Company issued $400.0 million of ten and one-half year 5.375% fixed rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $395.5 million.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company:

 

•                  Issued $500.0 million of ten and one-half year 5.125% fixed-rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $496.2 million;

•                  Had $300.0 million in fixed rate public notes remarketed as originally contemplated in a remarketing agreement entered into in connection with the original issuance of the notes, with the interest rate changing from 6.63% to 6.584% effective April 14, 2005 (notes still mature on April 13, 2015);

•                  Repaid $190.0 million of fixed-rate public notes at maturity; and

•                  Repaid $4.3 million of other unsecured notes.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company:

 

•                  Issued $300.0 million of five-year 4.75% fixed-rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $296.8 million;

•                  Issued $500.0 million of ten-year 5.25% fixed rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $496.1 million;

•                  Repaid $415.0 million of fixed rate public notes at maturity;

•                  Repaid $20.7 million of other unsecured notes; and

 

F-29



 

•                  Obtained an unsecured floating rate loan with a total commitment of $300.0 million and an initial borrowing of $100.0 million on July 15, 2004.  This loan was paid off in full and terminated on September 14, 2004.

 

Aggregate payments of principal on unsecured notes payable for each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 

Year

 

Total

 

2006 (1)

 

$

204,214

 

2007

 

154,089

 

2008

 

129,842

 

2009

 

294,878

 

2010

 

227

 

Thereafter

 

2,659,534

 

Total

 

$

3,442,784

 

 


(1)          Includes $150.0 million of 7.57% unsecured debt with a final maturity of 2026 that is putable in 2006.

 

10.                               Lines of Credit

 

On April 1, 2005, the Operating Partnership obtained a new three-year $1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility maturing on May 29, 2008, and terminated the $700.0 million credit facility that was scheduled to expire in May 2005.  The Operating Partnership has the ability to increase available borrowings up to $500.0 million under certain circumstances.  Advances under the new facility bear interest at variable rates based upon LIBOR at various interest periods plus a spread dependent upon the Operating Partnership’s credit rating or based on bids received from the lending group.  EQR has guaranteed the Operating Partnership’s credit facility up to the maximum amount and for the full term of the facility.

 

On August 30, 2005, the Operating Partnership obtained a new one-year $600.0 million revolving credit facility maturing on August 29, 2006.  Advances under the new facility bore interest at variable rates based on LIBOR at various interest periods plus a spread dependent upon the Operating Partnership’s credit rating.  EQR guaranteed this credit facility up to the maximum amount and for its full term.  This credit facility was repaid in full and terminated on January 20, 2006.

 

As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, $769.0 million and $150.0 million, respectively, was outstanding and $50.2 million and $65.4 million, respectively, was restricted (dedicated to support letters of credit and not available for borrowing) on the credit facilities.  During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the weighted average interest rate was 3.80% and 1.73%, respectively.

 

11.                               Derivative Instruments

 

The following table summarizes the consolidated derivative instruments at December 31, 2005 (dollar amounts are in thousands):

 

F-30



 

 

 

Fair Value
Hedges (1)

 

Forward Starting
Swaps (2)

 

Development Cash
Flow Hedges (3)

 

Current Notional Balance

 

$

370,000

 

$

300,000

 

$

36,178

 

Lowest Possible Notional

 

$

370,000

 

$

300,000

 

$

18,568

 

Highest Possible Notional

 

$

370,000

 

$

300,000

 

$

65,739

 

Lowest Interest Rate

 

3.245

%

4.435

%

3.310

%

Highest Interest Rate

 

3.787

%

4.589

%

4.530

%

Earliest Maturity Date

 

2009

 

2016

 

2006

 

Latest Maturity Date

 

2009

 

2017

 

2007

 

Estimated Asset (Liability) Fair Value

 

$

(15,730

)

$

9,618

 

$

89

 

 


(1) Fair Value Hedges – Converts outstanding fixed rate debt to a floating interest rate.

(2) Forward Starting Swaps – Designed to partially fix the interest rate in advance of a planned future debt issuance.

(3) Development Cash Flow Hedges – Converts outstanding floating rate debt to a fixed interest rate.

 

On December 31, 2005, the net derivative instruments were reported at their fair value as other assets of approximately $9.7 million and as other liabilities of approximately $15.7 million.  As of December 31, 2005, there were approximately $14.8 million in deferred losses, net, included in accumulated other comprehensive loss.  Based on the estimated fair values of the net derivative instruments at December 31, 2005, the Company may recognize an estimated $3.1 million of accumulated other comprehensive loss as additional interest expense during the twelve months ending December 31, 2006.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company paid approximately $7.8 million to terminate eight forward starting swaps in conjunction with the issuance of $500.0 million of ten and one-half year unsecured notes.  The $7.8 million has been deferred and will be recognized as additional interest expense over the life of the unsecured notes.

 

In January 2006, the Company received approximately $10.7 million to terminate six forward starting swaps in conjunction with the issuance of $400.0 million of ten and one-half year unsecured notes.  The $10.7 million has been deferred and will be recognized as a reduction of interest expense over the life of the unsecured notes.

 

12.                               Earnings Per Share

 

The following tables set forth the computation of net income per share – basic and net income per share – diluted:

 

F-31



 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

 

Numerator for net income per share – basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

152,462

 

$

117,779

 

$

123,294

 

Preferred distributions

 

(49,642

)

(53,746

)

(76,435

)

Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares

 

(4,359

)

—

 

(20,237

)

Allocation of Minority Interests – Operating Partnership to discontinued operations

 

47,880

 

24,606

 

30,041

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations available to Common Shares, net of allocation of Minority Interests – Operating Partnership

 

146,341

 

88,639

 

56,663

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations, net of allocation of Minority Interests – Operating Partnership

 

650,563

 

296,343

 

287,372

 

Discontinued operations, net of allocation of Minority Interests – Operating Partnership

 

10,888

 

33,601

 

82,604

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator for net income per share – basic

 

$

807,792

 

$

418,583

 

$

426,639

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator for net income per share – diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

 

$

152,462

 

$

117,779

 

$

123,294

 

Preferred distributions

 

(49,642

)

(53,746

)

(76,435

)

Premium on redemption of Preferred Shares

 

(4,359

)

—

 

(20,237

)

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allocation to Minority Interests – Operating Partnership

 

58,514

 

31,228

 

34,658

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations available to Common Shares

 

156,975

 

95,261

 

61,280

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations

 

697,655

 

318,443

 

310,706

 

Discontinued operations, net

 

11,676

 

36,107

 

89,311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Numerator for net income per share – diluted

 

$

866,306

 

$

449,811

 

$

461,297

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for net income per share – basic and diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for net income per share – basic

 

285,760

 

279,744

 

272,337

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OP Units

 

20,819

 

20,939

 

22,186

 

Share options/restricted shares

 

4,206

 

3,188

 

2,518

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for net income per share – diluted

 

310,785

 

303,871

 

297,041

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share – basic

 

$

2.83

 

$

1.50

 

$

1.57

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share – diluted

 

$

2.79

 

$

1.48

 

$

1.55

 

 

F-32



 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share – basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations available to Common Shares

 

$

0.512

 

$

0.317

 

$

0.208

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations

 

2.277

 

1.059

 

1.055

 

Discontinued operations, net

 

0.038

 

0.120

 

0.303

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share – basic

 

$

2.827

 

$

1.496

 

$

1.566

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share – diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations available to Common shares

 

$

0.505

 

$

0.313

 

$

0.206

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations

 

2.245

 

1.048

 

1.046

 

Discontinued operations, net

 

0.038

 

0.119

 

0.301

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share – diluted

 

$

2.788

 

$

1.480

 

$

1.553

 

 

Convertible preferred shares/units that could be converted into 1,772,048, 3,215,472 and 14,745,904 weighted average Common Shares for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effects would be anti-dilutive.

 

For additional disclosures regarding the employee share options and restricted shares, see Notes 2 and 14.

 

13.                               Discontinued Operations

 

The Company has presented separately as discontinued operations in all periods the results of operations for all consolidated assets disposed of on or after January 1, 2002 (the date of adoption of SFAS No. 144) and all operations related to condominium conversion properties effective upon their respective transfer into a TRS.

 

The components of discontinued operations are outlined below and include the results of operations for the respective periods that the Company owned such assets during each of the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003.

 

F-33



 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

(Amounts in thousands)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

94,121

 

$

199,587

 

$

345,428

 

Total revenues

 

94,121

 

199,587

 

345,428

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXPENSES (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and maintenance

 

38,373

 

70,782

 

115,447

 

Real estate taxes and insurance

 

13,348

 

24,284

 

37,913

 

Property management

 

389

 

629

 

232

 

Depreciation

 

20,818

 

51,209

 

88,548

 

General and administrative

 

361

 

341

 

—

 

Total expenses

 

73,289

 

147,245

 

242,140

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operating income

 

20,832

 

52,342

 

103,288

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other income

 

1,293

 

184

 

283

 

Interest (2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expense incurred, net

 

(9,853

)

(15,200

)

(12,998

)

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

(596

)

(1,219

)

(1,262

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations, net

 

$

11,676

 

$

36,107

 

$

89,311

 

 


(1)       Includes expenses paid in the current period for properties sold in prior periods related to the Company’s period of ownership.

(2)       Interest only includes interest expense specific to secured mortgage notes payable for properties sold.

 

For the properties sold during 2005 (excluding condominium conversion properties), the investment in real estate, net of accumulated depreciation, and the mortgage notes payable balances at December 31, 2004 were $805.2 million and $111.8 million, respectively.

 

The net real estate basis of the Company’s condominium conversion properties and land parcels owned by the TRS, which were included in investment in real estate, net in the consolidated balance sheets, was $276.8 million and $335.5 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

 

14.                               Share Incentive Plans

 

On May 15, 2002, the shareholders of EQR approved the Company’s 2002 Share Incentive Plan.  The maximum aggregate number of awards that may be granted under this plan may not exceed 7.5% of the Company’s outstanding Common Shares calculated on a “fully diluted” basis and determined annually on the first day of each calendar year.  As of January 1, 2006, this amount equaled 23,370,851, of which 15,421,477 is available for future issuance.  No awards may be granted under the 2002 Share Incentive Plan after February 20, 2012.

 

Pursuant to the 2002 Share Incentive Plan and the Fifth Amended and Restated 1993 Share Option and Share Award Plan (collectively the “Share Incentive Plans”), officers, trustees, key employees and consultants of the Company may be offered the opportunity to acquire Common Shares through the grant of share options (“Options”) including non-qualified share options (“NQSOs”), incentive share options (“ISOs”) and share appreciation rights (“SARs”), or may be granted restricted or non-restricted shares.  Additionally, officers and key employees of the Company may be awarded Common Shares, subject to conditions and restrictions as described in the Share Incentive Plans.  Finally, certain executive officers of

 

F-34



 

the Company are subject to the Company’s performance based restricted share plan.  Options, SARs, restricted shares and performance shares are sometimes collectively referred to herein as “Awards”.

 

The Options generally are granted at the fair market value of the Company’s Common Shares at the date of grant, vest over a three year period, are exercisable upon vesting and expire ten years from the date of grant.  The exercise price for all Options under the Share Incentive Plans shall not be less than the fair market value of the underlying Common Shares at the time the Option is granted.  The Fifth Amended and Restated 1993 Share Option and Share Award Plan will terminate at such time as all outstanding Awards have expired or have been exercised/vested.  The Board of Trustees may at any time amend or terminate the Share Incentive Plans, but termination will not affect Awards previously granted.  Any Options which had vested prior to such a termination would remain exercisable by the holder thereof.

 

As to the Options that have been granted through December 31, 2005, generally, one-third are exercisable one year after the initial grant, one-third are exercisable two years following the date such Options were granted and the remaining one-third are exercisable three years following the date such Options were granted.

 

As to the restricted shares that have been awarded through December 31, 2005, these shares generally vest three years from the award date.  During the three-year period of restriction, the employee receives quarterly dividend payments on their shares.  The Company’s unvested restricted shareholders receive dividends at the same rate and on the same date as any other Common Share holder.  In addition, the Company’s unvested restricted shareholders have the same voting rights as any other Common Share holder.  As a result, dividends paid on unvested restricted shares are included as a distribution in excess of accumulated earnings and have not been considered in reducing net income available to Common Shares in a manner similar to the Company’s preferred share dividends for the earnings per share calculation.  If employment is terminated prior to the lapsing of the restriction, the shares are canceled.

 

In addition, each year selected executive officers of the Company receive performance-based awards.  The executive officers have the opportunity to earn in Common Shares an amount as little as 0% to as much as 225% of the target number of performance-based awards.  The owners of performance-based awards have no right to vote, receive dividends or transfer the awards until Common Shares are issued in exchange for the awards.  The number of Common Shares the executive officer actually receives on the third anniversary of the grant date will depend on the excess, if any, by which the Company’s Average Annual Return (i.e., the average of the Common Share dividends declared during each year as a percentage of the Common Share price as of the first business day of the first performance year and the average percentage increase in funds from operations (“FFO”) for each calendar year on a per share basis over the prior year) for the three performance years exceeds the average of the 10-year Treasury Note interest rate as of the first business day in January of each performance year (the “T-Note Rate”).

 

If the Company’s Average

 

Less

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greater

 

Annual Return exceeds

 

than

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

than

 

the T-Note Rate by:

 

0.99%

 

1-1.99%

 

2%

 

3%

 

4%

 

5%

 

6%

 

7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Then the executive officer will receive Common Shares equal to the target number of awards times the following %:

 

0%

 

50%

 

100%

 

115%

 

135%

 

165%

 

190%

 

225%

 

 

If the Company’s Average Annual Return exceeds the T-Note Rate by an amount which falls between any of the percentages in excess of the 2% threshold, the performance-based award will be determined by extrapolation between the two percentages.  Fifty percent of the Common Shares to which an executive officer may be entitled under the performance share grants will vest, subject to the

 

F-35



 

executive’s continued employment with the Company, on the third anniversary of the award (which will be the date the Common Shares are issued); twenty-five percent will vest on the fourth anniversary and the remaining twenty-five percent will vest on the fifth anniversary.  The Common Shares will also fully vest upon the executive’s death, retirement at or after age 62, disability or upon a change in control of the Company.

 

The following table summarizes information regarding both the restricted and performance-based share plans for the three years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

 

 

 

Restricted/
Performance
Share Awards

 

Weighted
Average

 

Compensation Expense

 

 

 

Year

 

Granted, Net of Cancellations

 

Grant
Price

 

General and Administrative (1)

 

Property
Management

 

Dividends
Incurred

 

2005

 

520,821

 

$

31.88

 

$

23.6 million

 

$

5.6 million

 

$

2.7 million

 

2004

 

515,622

 

$

29.28

 

$

6.4 million

 

$

6.1 million

 

$

2.5 million

 

2003

 

900,555

 

$

23.58

 

$

6.0 million

 

$

5.1 million

 

$

2.5 million

 

 


(1)   2005 amount includes $8.9 million of additional one-time expenses related to restricted/performance shares for Bruce W.Duncan and Edward Geraghty. See Note 21 for further discussion.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded compensation expense of $6.8 million, $3.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively, related to Options.

 

The Company elected to account for its stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and its amendment (SFAS No. 148), Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, effective in the first quarter of 2003, which resulted in compensation expense being recorded based on the fair value of the stock compensation granted.

 

Compensation expense related to restricted and performance-based share grants was previously recognized in accordance with APB No. 25.  The adoption of SFAS No. 123 does not significantly change the amount of compensation expense recognized for these grants.

 

See Note 2 for additional information regarding the Company’s stock-based compensation.

 

The table below summarizes the Option activity of the Share Incentive Plans and options assumed in connection with mergers (the “Merger Options”) for the three years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003:

 

F-36



 

 

 

Common Shares
Subject to Options

 

Weighted Average
Exercise Price
Per Option

 

Balance at December 31, 2002

 

12,818,815

 

$

23.63

 

Options granted (1993 plan)

 

665,304

 

$

23.55

 

Options granted (2002 plan)

 

2,217,124

 

$

23.59

 

Options exercised (1993 plan)

 

(2,696,110

)

$

20.61

 

Options exercised (2002 plan)

 

(500,000

)

$

23.55

 

Merger Options exercised

 

(52,995

)

$

19.55

 

Options canceled (1993 plan)

 

(324,298

)

$

25.08

 

Options canceled (2002 plan)

 

(42,242

)

$

23.55

 

Balance at December 31, 2003

 

12,085,598

 

$

24.27

 

Options granted (2002 plan)

 

2,254,570

 

$

29.33

 

Options exercised (1993 plan)

 

(2,920,057

)

$

23.75

 

Options exercised (2002 plan)

 

(423,866

)

$

23.55

 

Merger Options exercised

 

(6,836

)

$

20.14

 

Options canceled (1993 plan)

 

(90,436

)

$

23.44

 

Options canceled (2002 plan)

 

(79,751

)

$

28.02

 

Balance at December 31, 2004

 

10,819,222

 

$

25.48

 

Options granted (2002 plan)

 

2,235,268

 

$

31.91

 

Options exercised (1993 plan)

 

(1,630,321

)

$

23.44

 

Options exercised (2002 plan)

 

(611,943

)

$

26.31

 

Merger Options exercised

 

(6,480

)

$

18.10

 

Options canceled (1993 plan)

 

(27,677

)

$

24.53

 

Options canceled (2002 plan)

 

(205,326

)

$

30.32

 

Balance at December 31, 2005

 

10,572,743

 

$

27.02

 

 

The following table summarizes information regarding options outstanding at December 31, 2005:

 

 

 

Options Outstanding

 

Options Exercisable

 

Range of Exercise Prices

 

Options

 

Weighted
Average
Remaining Contractual
Life in Years

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

Options

 

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

 

$

 8.00 to $12.00

 

554

 

1.0

 

$

10.87

 

554

 

$

10.87

 

$

 12.01 to $16.00

 

1,400

 

0.1

 

$

15.19

 

1,400

 

$

15.19

 

$

 16.01 to $20.00

 

30,000

 

0.4

 

$

16.38

 

30,000

 

$

16.38

 

$

 20.01 to $24.00

 

2,573,936

 

5.0

 

$

22.14

 

1,985,156

 

$

21.73

 

$

 24.01 to $28.00

 

3,983,965

 

4.8

 

$

26.59

 

3,983,965

 

$

26.59

 

$

 28.01 to $32.00

 

3,918,962

 

8.5

 

$

30.60

 

855,639

 

$

30.30

 

$

 32.01 to $36.00

 

24,627

 

8.7

 

$

32.29

 

8,208

 

$

32.29

 

$

 36.01 to $40.00

 

39,299

 

9.6

 

$

37.93

 

—

 

—

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

 8.00 to $40.00

 

10,572,743

 

6.2

 

$

27.02

 

6,864,922

 

$

25.60

 

 

As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, 6,851,442 Options (with a weighted average exercise price of $24.47) and 8,274,915 Options (with a weighted average exercise price of $23.86) were exercisable,

 

F-37



 

respectively.

 

15.                               Employee Plans

 

The Company established an Employee Share Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) to provide employees and trustees the ability to annually acquire up to $100,000 of Common Shares of the Company.  In 2003, the Company’s shareholders approved an increase in the aggregate number of Common Shares available under the ESPP to 7,000,000 (from 2,000,000).  The Company has 4,484,186 Common Shares available for purchase under the ESPP at December 31, 2005.  The Common Shares may be purchased quarterly at a price equal to 85% of the lesser of: (a) the closing price for a share on the last day of such quarter; and (b) the greater of: (i) the closing price for a share on the first day of such quarter, and (ii) the average closing price for a share for all the business days in the quarter.  The following table summarizes information regarding the Common Shares issued under the ESPP:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

(Amounts in thousands except share and per share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares issued

 

286,751

 

275,616

 

289,274

 

Issuance price ranges

 

$27.89 – $32.27

 

$23.35 – $27.39

 

$20.64 – $24.74

 

Issuance proceeds

 

$8,285

 

$6,853

 

$6,324

 

 

The Company established a defined contribution plan (the “401(k) Plan”) to provide retirement benefits for employees that meet minimum employment criteria.  The Company matches dollar for dollar up to the first 3% of eligible compensation that a participant contributes to the 401(k) Plan (2% for 2004 and 2003).  Participants are vested in the Company’s contributions over five years.  The Company made contributions in the amount of $1.7 million and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and expects to make contributions in the amount of approximately $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

The Company may also elect to make an annual discretionary profit-sharing contribution as a percentage of each individual employee’s eligible compensation under the 401(k) Plan.  The Company expects to make contributions in the amount of approximately $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.  The Company did not make a contribution for the years ended December 31, 2004 or 2003.

 

The Company established a supplemental executive retirement savings plan (the “SERP”) to provide certain officers and trustees an opportunity to defer a portion of their eligible compensation in order to save for retirement.  The SERP is restricted to investments in Company Common Shares, certain marketable securities that have been specifically approved, and cash equivalents.  The deferred compensation liability represented in the SERP and the securities issued to fund such deferred compensation liability are consolidated by the Company and carried on the Company’s balance sheet, and the Company’s Common Shares held in the SERP are accounted for as a reduction to paid in capital.

 

16.                               Distribution Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan

 

On November 3, 1997, the Company filed with the SEC a Form S-3 Registration Statement to register 14,000,000 Common Shares pursuant to a Distribution Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan (the “DRIP Plan”).  The registration statement was declared effective on November 25, 1997.  The Company has 11,571,446 Common Shares available for issuance under the DRIP Plan at December 31, 2005.

 

The DRIP Plan provides holders of record and beneficial owners of Common Shares and Preferred Shares with a simple and convenient method of investing cash distributions in additional Common Shares (which is referred to herein as the “Dividend Reinvestment – DRIP Plan”).  Common Shares may also be purchased on a monthly basis with optional cash payments made by participants in the DRIP Plan and

 

F-38



 

interested new investors, not currently shareholders of the Company, at the market price of the Common Shares less a discount ranging between 0% and 5%, as determined in accordance with the DRIP Plan (which is referred to herein as the “Share Purchase – DRIP Plan”).  Common Shares purchased under the DRIP Plan may, at the option of the Company, be directly issued by the Company or purchased by the Company’s transfer agent in the open market using participants’ funds.

 

17.                               Transactions with Related Parties

 

The Company provided asset and property management services to certain related entities for properties not owned by the Company.  Fees received for providing such services were approximately $0.2 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

The Company reimbursed its Chief Operating Officer for the actual operating costs (excluding acquisition costs) of operating his personal aircraft for himself and other employees on Company business.  Amounts incurred were approximately $0.4 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 

The Company leases its corporate headquarters from an entity controlled by EQR’s Chairman of the Board of Trustees.  Amounts incurred for such office space for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, were approximately $2.1 million, $1.9 million and $1.7 million.  The Company believes these amounts equal market rates for such space.

 

The Company had the following additional non-continuing related party transaction.  The Company leased space in an office building in Augusta, Georgia indirectly owned by one of EQR’s former trustees since May 2003 and directly owned by an entity affiliated with the same EQR trustee from 1998 to 2003 (individual was a trustee through May 2004).  Amounts incurred for such office space were approximately $0.2 million for both the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.

 

18.                               Commitments and Contingencies

 

The Company, as an owner of real estate, is subject to various Federal, state and local environmental laws.  Compliance by the Company with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on the Company.  However, the Company cannot predict the impact of new or changed laws or regulations on its current properties or on properties that it may acquire in the future.

 

The Company tried a class action lawsuit in Palm Beach County, Florida during the last week of August of 2004 which challenged the assessment and collection of certain lease termination fees.  The case has been settled, subject to court approval.  The Company will pay $1.7 million into a class fund, $1.629 million of which was previously accrued during 2004.  In addition, the Company will pay $325,000 to reimburse class counsel for its out of pocket expenses, plus $2.55 million in attorney’s fees.  Costs of claims administration will be approximately $100,000.  An accrual for these additional potential payments was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2005.  Preliminary court approval of the settlement was obtained in February 2006 and final judgment is expected in the second quarter of 2006.

 

The Company does not believe there is any other litigation pending or threatened against the Company which, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably may be expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company established a reserve and recorded a corresponding expense of $15.2 million in estimated uninsured property damage at certain of its properties primarily located in Florida caused by Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne (included in rents received in advance and other liabilities and real estate taxes and insurance expense on the consolidated balance sheets and statements of operations, respectively).  The entire reserve had been spent for hurricane

 

F-39



 

related repairs through December 31, 2005.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company established a reserve and recorded a corresponding expense of $11.1 million, net of $8.1 million of insurance receivables, for estimated uninsured property damage at certain of its properties caused by Hurricane Wilma.  The receivable of $8.1 million and the reserve of $19.2 million are included in other assets and rents received in advance and other liabilities, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets.  The expense of $11.1 million is included in real estate taxes and insurance expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

As of December 31, 2005, the Company has six projects totaling 1,760 units in various stages of development with estimated completion dates ranging through March 31, 2008. The primary development agreements currently in place have the following key terms:

 

•                  The first development partner has the right, at any time following completion of a project subject to the agreement, to stipulate a value for such project and offer to sell its interest in the project to the Company based on such value.  If the Company chooses not to purchase the interest, the Company must agree to a sale of the project to an unrelated third party at such value.  The Company’s partner must exercise this right as to all projects subject to the agreement within five years after the receipt of the final certificate of occupancy on the last developed property.  In connection with this development agreement, the Company has an obligation to provide up to $40.0 million in credit enhancements to guarantee a portion of the third party construction financing.  As of February 1, 2006, the Company did not have any amounts outstanding related to this credit enhancement.  The Company would be required to perform under this agreement only if there was a material default under a third party construction mortgage agreement.  This agreement expires no later than December 31, 2018.  Notwithstanding the termination of the agreement, the Company shall have recourse against its development partner for any losses incurred.

 

•                        The second development partner has the right, at any time following completion of a project subject to the agreement, to require the Company to purchase the partners’ interest in that project at a mutually agreeable price.  If the Company and the partner are unable to agree on a price, both parties will obtain appraisals.  If the appraised values vary by more than 10%, both the Company and its partner will agree on a third appraiser to determine which original appraisal is closest to its determination of value.  The Company may elect at that time not to purchase the property and instead, authorize its partner to sell the project at or above the agreed-upon value to an unrelated third party.  Five years following the receipt of the final certificate of occupancy on the last developed property, the Company must purchase, at the agreed-upon price, any projects remaining unsold.

 

•                  The third development partner has the exclusive right for six months following stabilization, as defined, to market a subject project for sale.  Thereafter, either the Company or its development partner may market a subject project for sale.  If the Company’s development partner proposes the sale, the Company may elect to purchase the project at the price proposed by its partner or defer the sale until two independent appraisers appraise the project.  If the two appraised values vary by more than 5%, a third appraiser will be chosen to determine the fair market value of the property.  Once a value has been determined, the Company may elect to purchase the property or authorize its development partner to sell the project at the agreed-upon value.

 

In addition, the Company has various deal-specific development agreements with partners, the overall terms of which are similar in nature to those described above.

 

The Company’s guaranty of a credit enhancement agreement with respect to certain tax-exempt bonds issued to finance certain public improvements at a multifamily development project was terminated effective May 2, 2005 as the tax-exempt bonds were redeemed in full and the associated letter of credit was cancelled.

 

F-40



 

During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, total operating lease payments incurred for office space, including a portion of real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and utilities, aggregated $6.1 million, $5.8 million and $5.7 million, respectively.

 

The Company has entered into a retirement benefits agreement with its Chairman of the Board of Trustees and deferred compensation agreements with its chief operating officer and two former chief executive officers.  During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company recognized compensation expense of $2.2 million, $39,000 and $3.0 million, respectively, related to these agreements.

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations for minimum rent payments under operating leases and deferred compensation for the next five years and thereafter as of December 31, 2005:

 

 

 

Payments Due by Year (in thousands)

 

 

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 

2010

 

Thereafter

 

Total

 

Operating Leases:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum Rent Payments (a)

 

$

5,920

 

$

4,556

 

$

4,404

 

$

4,245

 

$

3,725

 

$

4,908

 

$

27,758

 

Other Long-Term Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Compensation (b)

 

813

 

813

 

813

 

1,444

 

1,444

 

16,556

 

21,883

 

 


(a)          Minimum basic rent due for various office space the Company leases and fixed base rent due on a ground lease for one property.

(b)         Estimated payments to the Company’s Chairman, two former CEO’s and its chief operating officer based on planned retirement

dates.

 

19.                               Asset Impairment

 

The Company recorded approximately $1.2 million of asset impairment charges related to its technology investments in the year ending December 31, 2003. These charges were the result of a review of the existing investments reflected on the consolidated balance sheet.  These impairment losses are reflected on the consolidated statements of operations in total expenses and include the write-down of assets classified as other assets.

 

20.                               Reportable Segments

 

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by senior management.  Senior management decides how resources are allocated and assesses performance on a monthly basis.

 

The Company’s primary business is owning, managing, and operating multifamily residential properties, which includes the generation of rental and other related income through the leasing of apartment units to residents and includes Equity Corporate Housing (“ECH”).  Senior management evaluates the performance of each of our apartment communities on an individual basis; however, each of our apartment communities has similar economic characteristics, residents, and products and services so they have been aggregated into one reportable segment.  The Company’s rental real estate segment comprises approximately 99.4%, 99.3% and 99.1% of total revenues from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.  The Company’s rental real estate segment comprises approximately 99.8% of total assets at both December 31, 2005 and 2004.

 

The primary financial measure for the Company’s rental real estate segment is net operating income (“NOI”), which represents rental income less: 1) property and maintenance expense; 2) real estate taxes and insurance expense; and 3) property management expense (all as reflected in the accompanying statements of operations).  The Company believes that NOI is helpful to investors as a supplemental measure of the operating performance of a real estate company because it is a direct measure of the actual operating results of the Company’s apartment communities.  Current year NOI is compared to prior year NOI and current year budgeted NOI as a measure of financial performance.  The following table presents

 

F-41



 

the NOI from our rental real estate specific to continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively:

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

(Amounts in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

1,943,789

 

$

1,742,028

 

$

1,566,065

 

Property and maintenance expense

 

(544,495

)

(477,605

)

(422,212

)

Real estate taxes and insurance expense

 

(224,400

)

(205,173

)

(170,181

)

Property management expense

 

(84,307

)

(77,093

)

(70,051

)

Net operating income

 

$

1,090,587

 

$

982,157

 

$

903,621

 

 

The Company’s fee and asset management activity is immaterial and does not meet the threshold requirements of a reportable segment as provided for in SFAS No. 131.

 

All revenues are from external customers and there is no customer who contributed 10% or more of the Company’s total revenues during the three years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 or 2003.

 

21.                               Subsequent Events/Other

 

Subsequent to December 31, 2005 and through February 1, 2006, the Company:

 

•                  Acquired $148.7 million of apartment properties consisting of three properties and 705 units;

•                  Sold $230.2 million of apartment properties consisting of six properties and 1,681 units (excluding condominium units);

•                  Issued $400.0 million of ten and one-half year 5.375% fixed rate public notes, receiving net proceeds of $395.5 million and terminated six forward starting swaps designated to hedge the note issuance, receiving net proceeds of $10.7 million;

•                  Terminated its $600.0 million short-term revolving credit facility; and

•                  Repaid $13.0 million of mortgage loans.

 

During February 2006, the Company repurchased 719,800 of its Common Shares on the open market at an average price of $43.76 per share.  The Company paid approximately $31.5 million for these shares.  These Common Shares were repurchased to offset the issuance of 661,962 OP Units in connection with a property acquisition and to partially offset restricted shares granted in February 2006.

 

See also Note 3 for discussion of the redemption notices on the Series G and H Preference Interests.

 

On March 2, 2006, the Company announced that it has retained JP Morgan to assist in the possible sale of its Lexford housing division.  As of March 2, 2006, the division is comprised of 299 properties consisting of 27,390 apartment units located in ten states and a property management business located in Columbus, Ohio.  Exploration of a sale does not mandate that a sale or other transaction will follow.  The Company's Board of Trustees has not approved any specific transaction.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company received proceeds from technology and other investments of $82.1 million from the following:

 

•                  $25.0 million in full redemption of 1,000,000 shares of Wellsford 8.25% Convertible Trust Preferred Securities; and

•                  $57.1 million for its ownership interest in Rent.com in connection with the acquisition of Rent.com by eBay, Inc.  The $57.1 million was recorded as interest and other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

 

On March 28, 2005, the Company and Bruce W. Duncan, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (as further amended effective June 30, 2005, the “Amendment”) to reflect changes required in view of Mr. Duncan’s

 

F-42



 

retirement as CEO and trustee effective December 31, 2005.  The Amendment also amended Mr. Duncan’s Deferred Compensation Agreement entered into in January 2003.   The Company recorded approximately $11.2 million of additional general and administrative expense during the year ended December 31, 2005, primarily related to accelerated vesting of share options and restricted/performance shares.

 

Effective February 28, 2005, the Company and Edward Geraghty, the President of the Company’s Eastern Division, entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release reflecting Mr. Geraghty’s resignation effective February 28, 2005.  The Company recorded approximately $3.3 million of severance as additional general and administrative expense during the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

 

22.                               Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

 

The following unaudited quarterly data has been prepared on the basis of a December 31 year-end.  All amounts have also been restated in accordance with the discontinued operations provisions of SFAS No 144.  Amounts are in thousands, except for per share amounts.

 

2005

 

Fourth
Quarter
12/31

 

Third
Quarter
 9/30

 

Second
Quarter
6/30

 

First
Quarter
3/31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues (1)

 

$

518,919

 

$

495,488

 

$

478,906

 

$

461,624

 

Operating income (1)

 

126,305

 

126,878

 

135,239

 

123,522

 

Income from continuing operations (1)

 

30,665

 

9,287

 

29,892

 

82,618

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations (1)

 

194,602

 

254,178

 

108,171

 

140,704

 

Discontinued operations, net (1)

 

619

 

4,059

 

3,281

 

3,717

 

Net income *

 

225,886

 

267,524

 

141,344

 

227,039

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

215,205

 

250,247

 

128,326

 

214,014

 

Earnings per share – basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

0.75

 

$

0.87

 

$

0.45

 

$

0.75

 

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding

 

287,033

 

286,182

 

285,283

 

284,511

 

Earnings per share – diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

0.74

 

$

0.86

 

$

0.44

 

$

0.74

 

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding

 

312,408

 

311,564

 

309,979

 

308,576

 

 


(1)          The amounts presented for the first three quarters of 2005 are not equal to the same amounts previously reported in the respective Form 10-Q’s filed with the SEC for each period primarily as a result of changes in discontinued operations due to additional property sales which occurred throughout 2005 and the Company’s reclassification of its net gain on sales of land parcels to be included as a separate component of income from continuing operations. Below is a reconciliation to the amounts previously reported in the respective Form 10-Q’s:

 

F-43



 

2005

 

Third
Quarter
9/30

 

Second
Quarter
6/30

 

First
Quarter
3/31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues previously reported in Form 10-Q

 

$

504,406

 

$

499,503

 

$

488,502

 

Total revenues subsequently reclassified to discontinued operations

 

(8,918

)

(20,597

)

(27,924

)

Other

 

—

 

—

 

1,046

 

Total revenues disclosed in Form 10-K

 

$

495,488

 

$

478,906

 

$

461,624

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income previously reported in Form 10-Q

 

$

129,901

 

$

140,974

 

$

130,956

 

Operating income subsequently reclassified to discontinued operations

 

(3,023

)

(6,125

)

(8,673

)

Other

 

—

 

390

 

1,239

 

Operating income disclosed in Form 10-K

 

$

126,878

 

$

135,239

 

$

123,522

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations previously reported in Form 10-Q

 

$

11,930

 

$

35,431

 

$

79,913

 

Income from continuing operations subsequently reclassified to discontinued operations

 

(2,643

)

(5,927

)

(7,856

)

Reclassification of net gain on sales of land parcels

 

—

 

(2

)

10,368

 

Other

 

—

 

390

 

193

 

Income from continuing operations disclosed in Form 10-K

 

$

9,287

 

$

29,892

 

$

82,618

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations previously reported in Form 10-Q

 

$

254,178

 

$

108,559

 

$

151,265

 

Reclassification of net gain on sales of land parcels

 

—

 

2

 

(10,368

)

Other

 

—

 

(390

)

(193

)

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations disclosed in Form 10-K

 

$

254,178

 

$

108,171

 

$

140,704

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations, net previously reported in Form 10-Q

 

$

1,416

 

$

(2,646

)

$

(4,139

)

Discontinued operations, net from properties sold subsequent to the respective reporting period

 

2,643

 

5,927

 

7,856

 

Discontinued operations, net disclosed in Form 10-K

 

$

4,059

 

$

3,281

 

$

3,717

 

 

F-44



 

2004

 

Fourth
Quarter
12/31

 

Third
Quarter
9/30

 

Second
Quarter
6/30

 

First
Quarter
3/31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues (2)

 

$

451,944

 

$

448,251

 

$

440,417

 

$

413,212

 

Operating income (2)

 

126,633

 

112,902

 

127,337

 

123,594

 

Income from continuing operations (2)

 

27,894

 

21,394

 

40,341

 

28,150

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations (2)

 

116,272

 

58,448

 

72,224

 

71,499

 

Discontinued operations, net (2)

 

6,467

 

7,667

 

9,641

 

12,332

 

Net income *

 

150,633

 

87,509

 

122,206

 

111,981

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

137,558

 

74,163

 

108,553

 

98,309

 

Earnings per share – basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

0.49

 

$

0.26

 

$

0.39

 

$

0.35

 

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding

 

282,329

 

280,167

 

278,949

 

277,498

 

Earnings per share – diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income available to Common Shares

 

$

0.48

 

$

0.26

 

$

0.39

 

$

0.35

 

Weighted average Common Shares outstanding

 

306,841

 

304,028

 

302,201

 

301,781

 

 


(2)          The amounts presented for the four quarters of 2004 are not equal to the same amounts previously reported in the respective Form 10-Q’s/10-K filed with the SEC for each period primarily as a result of changes in discontinued operations due to additional property sales which occurred throughout 2005 and 2004 and the Company’s reclassification of its net gain on sales of land parcels to be included as a separate component of income from continuing operations.  Below is a reconciliation to the amounts previously reported in the respective Form 10-Q’s/10-K:

 

F-45



 

 

2004

 

Fourth
Quarter
12/31

 

Third
Quarter
9/30

 

Second
Quarter
6/30

 

First
Quarter
3/31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues previously reported in Form 10-Q/10-K

 

$

487,366

 

$

483,481

 

$

474,727

 

$

443,927

 

Total revenues subsequently reclassified to discontinued operations

 

(36,012

)

(35,808

)

(34,750

)

(31,227

)

Other

 

590

 

578

 

440

 

512

 

Total revenues disclosed in Form 10-K

 

$

451,944

 

$

448,251

 

$

440,417

 

$

413,212

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income previously reported in Form 10-Q/10-K

 

$

135,952

 

$

121,612

 

$

136,148

 

$

132,973

 

Operating income subsequently reclassified to discontinuedoperations

 

(9,832

)

(9,217

)

(9,157

)

(9,817

)

Other

 

513

 

507

 

346

 

438

 

Operating income disclosed in Form 10-K

 

$

126,633

 

$

112,902

 

$

127,337

 

$

123,594

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations previously reported in
Form 10-Q/10-K

 

$

33,303

 

$

26,185

 

$

39,483

 

$

36,305

 

Income from continuing operations subsequently reclassified to discontinued operations

 

(5,409

)

(4,737

)

(4,678

)

(8,155

)

Reclassification of net gain on sales of land parcels

 

—

 

(54

)

5,536

 

—

 

Income from continuing operations disclosed in Form 10-Q/10-K

 

$

27,894

 

$

21,394

 

$

40,341

 

$

28,150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations previously reported in Form 10-Q/10-K

 

$

116,272

 

$

58,394

 

$

77,760

 

$

71,499

 

Reclassification of net gain on sales of land parcels

 

—

 

54

 

(5,536

)

—

 

Net gain on sales of discontinued operations disclosed in Form 10-K

 

$

116,272

 

$

58,448

 

$

72,224

 

$

71,499

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations, net previously reported in Form 10-Q/10-K

 

$

1,058

 

$

2,930

 

$

4,963

 

$

4,177

 

Discontinued operations, net from properties sold subsequent to the respective reporting period

 

5,409

 

4,737

 

4,678

 

8,155

 

Discontinued operations, net disclosed in Form 10-K

 

$

6,467

 

$

7,667

 

$

9,641

 

$

12,332

 

 


* The Company did not have any extraordinary items or cumulative effect of change in accounting principle during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.  Therefore, income before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle is not shown as it was equal to the net income amounts disclosed above.

 

F-46



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

Overall Summary

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

Properties
(I)

 

Units (I)

 

Investment in Real
Estate, Gross

 

Accumulated
Depreciation

 

Investment in Real
Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EQR Wholly Owned Unencumbered

 

366

 

100,176

 

$

10,181,557,900

 

$

(1,791,910,458

)

$

8,389,647,442

 

$

—

 

EQR Wholly Owned Encumbered

 

187

 

50,068

 

4,667,122,468

 

(850,889,678

)

3,816,232,790

 

1,637,238,367

 

Portfolio/Entity Encumbrances (1)

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

985,111,291

 

EQR Wholly Owned Properties

 

553

 

150,244

 

14,848,680,368

 

(2,642,800,136

)

12,205,880,232

 

2,622,349,658

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lexford Wholly Owned Unencumbered

 

152

 

13,970

 

440,222,839

 

(101,050,199

)

339,172,640

 

—

 

Lexford Wholly Owned Encumbered

 

129

 

11,287

 

344,500,854

 

(82,531,830

)

261,969,024

 

192,063,643

 

Lexford Wholly Owned Properties

 

281

 

25,257

 

784,723,693

 

(183,582,029

)

601,141,664

 

192,063,643

 

Wholly Owned Properties

 

834

 

175,501

 

15,633,404,061

 

(2,826,382,165

)

12,807,021,896

 

2,814,413,301

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EQR Partially Owned Unencumbered

 

3

 

489

 

201,636,294

 

(4,617,484

)

197,018,810

 

—

 

EQR Partially Owned Encumbered

 

24

 

4,654

 

732,869,183

 

(55,315,318

)

677,553,865

 

551,057,508

 

EQR Partially Owned Properties

 

27

 

5,143

 

934,505,477

 

(59,932,802

)

874,572,675

 

551,057,508

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lexford Partially Owned Unencumbered

 

1

 

153

 

3,603,851

 

(248,947

)

3,354,904

 

—

 

Lexford Partially Owned Encumbered

 

7

 

708

 

18,856,920

 

(1,576,491

)

17,280,429

 

13,817,776

 

Lexford Partially Owned Properties

 

8

 

861

 

22,460,771

 

(1,825,438

)

20,635,333

 

13,817,776

 

Partially Owned Properties

 

35

 

6,004

 

956,966,248

 

(61,758,240

)

895,208,008

 

564,875,284

 

Total Consolidated Investment in Real Estate

 

869

 

181,505

 

$

16,590,370,309

 

$

(2,888,140,405

)

$

13,702,229,904

 

$

3,379,288,585

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unencumbered Properties

 

522

 

114,788

 

$

10,827,020,884

 

$

(1,897,827,088

)

$

8,929,193,796

 

$

—

 

Encumbered Properties

 

347

 

66,717

 

5,763,349,425

 

(990,313,317

)

4,773,036,108

 

3,379,288,585

 

Total Consolidated Investment in Real Estate

 

869

 

181,505

 

$

16,590,370,309

 

$

(2,888,140,405

)

$

13,702,229,904

 

$

3,379,288,585

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EQR Properties

 

580

 

155,387

 

$

15,783,185,845

 

$

(2,702,732,938

)

$

13,080,452,907

 

$

3,173,407,166

 

Lexford Properties (2)

 

289

 

26,118

 

807,184,464

 

(185,407,467

)

621,776,997

 

205,881,419

 

Total Consolidated Investment in Real Estate

 

869

 

181,505

 

$

16,590,370,309

 

$

(2,888,140,405

)

$

13,702,229,904

 

$

3,379,288,585

 

 


(1) See attached Encumbrances Reconciliation.

(2) Represents the Company’s ranch-style properties.

 

S-1



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

Encumbrances Reconciliation

December 31, 2005

 

Portfolio/Entity Encumbrances

 

Number of
Properties
Encumbered By

 

See Properties
With Note:

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EQR Arbors Financing LP

 

1

 

(J)

 

$

13,265,000

 

EQR-Bond Partnership

 

12

 

(K)

 

181,994,000

 

EQR Flatlands LLC

 

5

 

(L)

 

50,000,000

 

GPT-Windsor, LLC

 

16*

 

(M)

 

63,000,000

 

EQR-Codelle, LP

 

10

 

(N)

 

116,555,094

 

EQR-Conner, LP

 

14

 

(O)

 

202,528,377

 

EQR-FANCAP 2000A LP

 

11

 

(P)

 

148,333,000

 

EQR-Fankey 2004 Ltd. Pship

 

8

 

(Q)

 

209,435,820

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Portfolio/Entity Encumbrances

 

 

 

 

 

985,111,291

 

Individual Property Encumbrances

 

 

 

 

 

2,394,177,294

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Encumbrances per Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,379,288,585

 

 


* Collateral also includes $2.9 million invested in U.S. Treasury Securities which is included in Deposits - Restricted in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2005.

 

S-2



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

(Amounts in thousands)

 

The changes in total real estate for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

14,852,621

 

$

12,874,379

 

$

13,046,263

 

Acquisitions and development

 

2,906,414

 

2,563,612

 

800,143

 

Improvements

 

250,110

 

218,724

 

184,876

 

Dispositions and other

 

(1,418,775

)

(804,094

)

(1,156,903

)

Balance, end of year

 

$

16,590,370

 

$

14,852,621

 

$

12,874,379

 

 

The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 are as follows:

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, beginning of year

 

$

2,599,827

 

$

2,296,013

 

$

2,112,017

 

Depreciation

 

528,152

 

496,422

 

470,908

 

Dispositions and other

 

(239,839

)

(192,608

)

(286,912

)

Balance, end of year

 

$

2,888,140

 

$

2,599,827

 

$

2,296,013

 

 

S-3



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

EQR Wholly Owned Unencumbered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2300 Elliott

 

Seattle, WA

 

1992

 

92

 

$

796,800

 

$

7,173,725

 

$

—

 

$

4,349,931

 

$

796,800

 

$

11,523,656

 

$

12,320,456

 

$

(5,203,766

)

$

7,116,690

 

$

—

 

500 Elliott, LLC

 

Seattle, WA (G)

 

2001

 

44

 

3,400,000

 

5,760,745

 

—

 

—

 

3,400,000

 

5,760,745

 

9,160,745

 

—

 

9,160,745

 

—

 

71 Broadway

 

New York, NY (G)

 

1997

 

238

 

22,611,600

 

77,491,686

 

—

 

138,848

 

22,611,600

 

77,630,534

 

100,242,134

 

(4,009,196

)

96,232,937

 

—

 

Abington Glen

 

Abington, MA

 

1968

 

90

 

553,105

 

3,697,396

 

—

 

1,767,105

 

553,105

 

5,464,501

 

6,017,607

 

(992,640

)

5,024,966

 

—

 

Acacia Creek

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1988-1994

 

304

 

3,663,473

 

21,172,386

 

—

 

1,756,282

 

3,663,473

 

22,928,668

 

26,592,141

 

(6,776,567

)

19,815,574

 

—

 

Alameda Ranch

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1990

 

272

 

11,823,840

 

31,990,970

 

—

 

—

 

11,823,840

 

31,990,970

 

43,814,810

 

—

 

43,814,810

 

—

 

Alborada

 

Fremont, CA

 

1999

 

442

 

24,310,000

 

59,214,129

 

—

 

1,377,239

 

24,310,000

 

60,591,367

 

84,901,367

 

(12,242,396

)

72,658,971

 

—

 

Alexander on Ponce

 

Atlanta, GA

 

2003

 

330

 

9,900,000

 

35,784,691

 

—

 

—

 

9,900,000

 

35,784,691

 

45,684,691

 

—

 

45,684,691

 

—

 

Alexandria at Lake Buena Vista

 

Orlando, FL

 

2000

 

336

 

11,760,000

 

40,516,075

 

—

 

—

 

11,760,000

 

40,516,075

 

52,276,075

 

—

 

52,276,075

 

—

 

Arboretum at Stonelake

 

Austin, TX

 

1996

 

408

 

6,120,000

 

24,069,023

 

—

 

1,005,839

 

6,120,000

 

25,074,861

 

31,194,861

 

(2,363,508

)

28,831,353

 

—

 

Arbors of Brentwood

 

Nashville, TN

 

1986

 

346

 

404,670

 

13,536,367

 

—

 

3,376,258

 

404,670

 

16,912,625

 

17,317,295

 

(7,553,080

)

9,764,216

 

—

 

Ashley Park at Brier Creek

 

Raleigh, NC

 

2002

 

374

 

5,610,000

 

31,467,489

 

—

 

925,716

 

5,610,000

 

32,393,205

 

38,003,205

 

(1,413,581

)

36,589,624

 

—

 

Ashton, The

 

Corona Hills, CA

 

1986

 

492

 

2,594,264

 

33,042,398

 

—

 

3,178,241

 

2,594,264

 

36,220,639

 

38,814,903

 

(10,673,884

)

28,141,019

 

—

 

Aspen Crossing

 

Silver Spring, MD

 

1979

 

192

 

2,880,000

 

8,551,377

 

—

 

1,960,509

 

2,880,000

 

10,511,886

 

13,391,886

 

(2,918,194

)

10,473,691

 

—

 

Audubon Village

 

Tampa, FL

 

1990

 

447

 

3,576,000

 

26,121,909

 

—

 

1,526,976

 

3,576,000

 

27,648,884

 

31,224,884

 

(7,446,575

)

23,778,309

 

—

 

Auvers Village

 

Orlando, FL

 

1991

 

480

 

3,840,000

 

29,322,243

 

—

 

2,368,357

 

3,840,000

 

31,690,600

 

35,530,600

 

(8,629,375

)

26,901,225

 

—

 

Avenue Royale

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

2001

 

200

 

5,000,000

 

17,786,075

 

—

 

189,007

 

5,000,000

 

17,975,082

 

22,975,082

 

(677,281

)

22,297,802

 

—

 

Balcones Club

 

Austin, TX

 

1984

 

312

 

2,185,500

 

10,119,232

 

—

 

2,582,074

 

2,185,500

 

12,701,306

 

14,886,806

 

(4,152,501

)

10,734,306

 

—

 

Bay Ridge

 

San Pedro, CA

 

1987

 

60

 

2,401,300

 

2,176,963

 

—

 

527,782

 

2,401,300

 

2,704,745

 

5,106,045

 

(914,534

)

4,191,511

 

—

 

Bayside at the Islands

 

Gilbert, AZ

 

1989

 

272

 

3,306,484

 

15,573,006

 

—

 

1,646,481

 

3,306,484

 

17,219,487

 

20,525,971

 

(5,290,960

)

15,235,011

 

—

 

Bell Road I & II

 

Nashville, TN

 

(F)

 

—

 

3,100,000

 

1,120,214

 

—

 

—

 

3,100,000

 

1,120,214

 

4,220,214

 

—

 

4,220,214

 

—

 

Bella Vista I & II

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

2003

 

315

 

16,883,410

 

61,672,690

 

—

 

177,732

 

16,883,410

 

61,850,422

 

78,733,832

 

(4,269,829

)

74,464,003

 

—

 

Bella Vista III

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

(F)

 

—

 

14,799,344

 

20,515,274

 

—

 

—

 

14,799,344

 

20,515,274

 

35,314,618

 

—

 

35,314,618

 

—

 

Bella Vista Private Residences

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

1995

 

248

 

2,978,879

 

20,641,333

 

—

 

764,856

 

2,978,879

 

21,406,189

 

24,385,068

 

(6,058,287

)

18,326,781

 

—

 

Bellagio Apartment Homes

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1995

 

202

 

2,626,000

 

16,025,041

 

—

 

429,812

 

2,626,000

 

16,454,853

 

19,080,853

 

(980,914

)

18,099,939

 

—

 

Bellevue Meadows

 

Bellevue, WA

 

1983

 

180

 

4,507,100

 

12,574,814

 

—

 

925,648

 

4,507,100

 

13,500,462

 

18,007,562

 

(3,649,470

)

14,358,092

 

—

 

Beneva Place

 

Sarasota, FL

 

1986

 

192

 

1,344,000

 

9,665,447

 

—

 

955,296

 

1,344,000

 

10,620,742

 

11,964,742

 

(2,857,539

)

9,107,203

 

—

 

Bermuda Cove

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1989

 

350

 

1,503,000

 

19,561,896

 

—

 

3,280,079

 

1,503,000

 

22,841,975

 

24,344,975

 

(5,916,644

)

18,428,331

 

—

 

Bishop Park

 

Winter Park, FL

 

1991

 

324

 

2,592,000

 

17,990,436

 

—

 

2,603,577

 

2,592,000

 

20,594,013

 

23,186,013

 

(5,884,075

)

17,301,938

 

—

 

Bourbon Square

 

Palatine, IL

 

1984-87

 

612

 

3,899,744

 

35,113,276

 

—

 

8,674,682

 

3,899,744

 

43,787,958

 

47,687,702

 

(20,328,925

)

27,358,777

 

—

 

Braewood, LLC

 

Bothell, WA

 

1999/2000

 

84

 

2,000,000

 

8,370,136

 

—

 

61,160

 

2,000,000

 

8,431,296

 

10,431,296

 

—

 

10,431,296

 

—

 

Bramblewood

 

San Jose, CA

 

1986

 

108

 

5,190,700

 

9,659,184

 

—

 

586,282

 

5,190,700

 

10,245,466

 

15,436,166

 

(2,791,288

)

12,644,878

 

—

 

Brentwood

 

Vancouver, WA

 

1990

 

296

 

1,357,221

 

12,202,521

 

—

 

1,910,465

 

1,357,221

 

14,112,986

 

15,470,207

 

(5,735,863

)

9,734,345

 

—

 

Breton Mill

 

Houston, TX

 

1986

 

392

 

212,820

 

8,547,263

 

—

 

1,902,175

 

212,820

 

10,449,438

 

10,662,258

 

(4,767,159

)

5,895,099

 

—

 

Bridford Lakes II

 

Greensboro, NC

 

(F)

 

—

 

1,100,564

 

792,509

 

—

 

—

 

1,100,564

 

792,509

 

1,893,073

 

—

 

1,893,073

 

—

 

Bridgeport

 

Raleigh, NC

 

1990

 

276

 

1,296,700

 

11,666,278

 

—

 

1,394,842

 

1,296,700

 

13,061,120

 

14,357,820

 

(5,917,706

)

8,440,114

 

—

 

Bridgewater at Wells Crossing

 

Orange Park, FL

 

1986

 

288

 

2,160,000

 

13,347,549

 

—

 

1,091,435

 

2,160,000

 

14,438,984

 

16,598,984

 

(3,459,414

)

13,139,570

 

—

 

Brittany Square

 

Tulsa, OK

 

1982

 

212

 

625,000

 

4,050,961

 

—

 

1,952,149

 

625,000

 

6,003,110

 

6,628,110

 

(4,312,012

)

2,316,098

 

—

 

Brookside (CO)

 

Boulder, CO

 

1993

 

144

 

3,600,400

 

10,211,159

 

—

 

480,859

 

3,600,400

 

10,692,018

 

14,292,418

 

(2,946,629

)

11,345,789

 

—

 

Brookside II (MD)

 

Frederick, MD

 

1979

 

204

 

2,450,800

 

6,913,202

 

—

 

1,523,507

 

2,450,800

 

8,436,710

 

10,887,510

 

(2,656,701

)

8,230,808

 

—

 

Burwick Farms

 

Howell, MI

 

1991

 

264

 

1,104,600

 

9,932,207

 

—

 

1,134,133

 

1,104,600

 

11,066,340

 

12,170,940

 

(3,552,891

)

8,618,048

 

—

 

Cambridge at Hickory Hollow

 

Antioch, TN

 

1997

 

360

 

3,240,800

 

17,900,033

 

—

 

1,252,640

 

3,240,800

 

19,152,673

 

22,393,473

 

(5,912,911

)

16,480,562

 

—

 

Cambridge Estates

 

Norwich, CT

 

1977

 

92

 

590,185

 

3,945,265

 

—

 

281,476

 

590,185

 

4,226,740

 

4,816,925

 

(865,711

)

3,951,214

 

—

 

Camellero

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1979

 

348

 

1,924,900

 

17,324,593

 

—

 

4,428,932

 

1,924,900

 

21,753,525

 

23,678,425

 

(9,582,156

)

14,096,269

 

—

 

Canyon Crest

 

Santa Clarita, CA

 

1993

 

158

 

2,370,000

 

10,141,878

 

—

 

1,175,258

 

2,370,000

 

11,317,136

 

13,687,136

 

(2,859,416

)

10,827,721

 

—

 

Canyon Ridge

 

San Diego, CA

 

1989

 

162

 

4,869,448

 

11,955,064

 

—

 

1,050,392

 

4,869,448

 

13,005,455

 

17,874,903

 

(3,812,632

)

14,062,271

 

—

 

Carlyle Mill

 

Alexandria, VA

 

2002

 

317

 

10,000,000

 

51,368,058

 

—

 

546,420

 

10,000,000

 

51,914,479

 

61,914,479

 

(4,888,025

)

57,026,454

 

—

 

Carmel Terrace

 

San Diego, CA

 

1988-89

 

384

 

2,288,300

 

20,596,281

 

—

 

2,644,495

 

2,288,300

 

23,240,776

 

25,529,076

 

(8,935,979

)

16,593,097

 

—

 

Casa Capricorn

 

San Diego, CA

 

1981

 

192

 

1,262,700

 

11,365,093

 

—

 

2,161,292

 

1,262,700

 

13,526,386

 

14,789,086

 

(4,579,366

)

10,209,720

 

—

 

Casa Ruiz

 

San Diego, CA

 

1976-1986

 

196

 

3,922,400

 

9,389,153

 

—

 

2,067,941

 

3,922,400

 

11,457,095

 

15,379,495

 

(3,597,484

)

11,782,010

 

—

 

Cascade at Landmark

 

Alexandria, VA

 

1990

 

277

 

3,603,400

 

19,657,554

 

—

 

2,464,910

 

3,603,400

 

22,122,464

 

25,725,864

 

(7,143,449

)

18,582,415

 

—

 

CenterPointe

 

Beaverton, OR

 

1996

 

264

 

3,419,500

 

15,708,853

 

—

 

1,988,963

 

3,419,500

 

17,697,815

 

21,117,315

 

(3,024,936

)

18,092,379

 

—

 

Centre Club

 

Ontario, CA

 

1994

 

312

 

5,616,000

 

23,485,891

 

—

 

1,145,980

 

5,616,000

 

24,631,871

 

30,247,871

 

(4,912,423

)

25,335,449

 

—

 

Centre Club II

 

Ontario, CA

 

2002

 

100

 

1,820,000

 

9,528,898

 

—

 

88,086

 

1,820,000

 

9,616,983

 

11,436,983

 

(1,300,115

)

10,136,868

 

—

 

Champion Oaks

 

Houston, TX

 

1984

 

252

 

931,900

 

8,389,394

 

—

 

1,661,818

 

931,900

 

10,051,212

 

10,983,112

 

(4,290,170

)

6,692,941

 

—

 

Chandler Court

 

Chandler, AZ

 

1987

 

312

 

1,353,100

 

12,175,173

 

—

 

2,823,620

 

1,353,100

 

14,998,793

 

16,351,893

 

(6,062,831

)

10,289,062

 

—

 

Chantecleer Lakes Condominium Homes

 

Naperville, IL

 

1986

 

304

 

6,689,400

 

16,465,143

 

—

 

2,141,104

 

6,689,400

 

18,606,247

 

25,295,647

 

(5,585,250

)

19,710,397

 

—

 

Chatelaine Park

 

Duluth, GA

 

1995

 

303

 

1,818,000

 

24,489,671

 

—

 

899,727

 

1,818,000

 

25,389,398

 

27,207,398

 

(6,581,581

)

20,625,817

 

—

 

Chelsea Square

 

Redmond, WA

 

1991

 

113

 

3,397,100

 

9,289,074

 

—

 

468,533

 

3,397,100

 

9,757,607

 

13,154,707

 

(2,675,769

)

10,478,937

 

—

 

Cherry Creek IV

 

Hermitage, TN

 

(F)

 

—

 

—

 

1,593

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

1,593

 

1,593

 

—

 

1,593

 

—

 

Chestnut Hills

 

Puyallup, WA

 

1991

 

157

 

756,300

 

6,806,635

 

—

 

921,259

 

756,300

 

7,727,894

 

8,484,194

 

(2,584,583

)

5,899,611

 

—

 

Cimarron Ridge

 

Aurora, CO

 

1984

 

296

 

1,591,100

 

14,320,031

 

—

 

2,425,995

 

1,591,100

 

16,746,026

 

18,337,126

 

(5,888,899

)

12,448,226

 

—

 

City View (GA)

 

Atlanta, GA (G)

 

2003

 

202

 

6,440,800

 

19,992,518

 

—

 

518,932

 

6,440,800

 

20,511,450

 

26,952,250

 

(875,149

)

26,077,101

 

—

 

City View at Highlands

 

Lombard, IL

 

2003

 

403

 

4,636,653

 

60,295,044

 

—

 

190,276

 

4,636,653

 

60,485,320

 

65,121,973

 

(3,987,078

)

61,134,895

 

—

 

Claire Point

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1986

 

256

 

2,048,000

 

14,649,393

 

—

 

1,221,767

 

2,048,000

 

15,871,160

 

17,919,160

 

(4,417,915

)

13,501,245

 

—

 

Clarion

 

Decatur, GA

 

1990

 

217

 

1,504,300

 

13,537,919

 

—

 

1,126,195

 

1,504,300

 

14,664,115

 

16,168,415

 

(4,392,488

)

11,775,926

 

—

 

Clarys Crossing

 

Columbia, MD

 

1984

 

198

 

891,000

 

15,489,721

 

—

 

1,301,008

 

891,000

 

16,790,729

 

17,681,729

 

(4,497,851

)

13,183,879

 

—

 

Club at the Green

 

Beaverton, OR

 

1991

 

254

 

2,030,950

 

12,616,747

 

—

 

1,876,278

 

2,030,950

 

14,493,025

 

16,523,975

 

(4,879,000

)

11,644,975

 

—

 

Coach Lantern

 

Scarborough, ME

 

1971/1981

 

90

 

452,900

 

4,405,723

 

—

 

701,106

 

452,900

 

5,106,829

 

5,559,729

 

(1,536,881

)

4,022,848

 

—

 

Coconut Palm Club

 

Coconut Creek, GA

 

1992

 

300

 

3,001,700

 

17,678,928

 

—

 

1,281,335

 

3,001,700

 

18,960,264

 

21,961,964

 

(5,390,670

)

16,571,294

 

—

 

 

S-4



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

Colinas Pointe

 

Denver, CO

 

1986

 

272

 

1,587,400

 

14,285,902

 

—

 

1,350,117

 

1,587,400

 

15,636,019

 

17,223,419

 

(4,954,973

)

12,268,446

 

—

 

Collier Ridge

 

Atlanta, GA

 

1980

 

300

 

5,100,000

 

20,425,822

 

—

 

3,580,004

 

5,100,000

 

24,005,826

 

29,105,826

 

(6,314,409

)

22,791,416

 

—

 

Conway Station

 

Orlando, FL

 

1987

 

242

 

1,936,000

 

10,852,858

 

—

 

991,219

 

1,936,000

 

11,844,077

 

13,780,077

 

(3,276,871

)

10,503,206

 

—

 

Copper Canyon

 

Highlands Ranch, CO

 

1999

 

222

 

1,443,000

 

16,251,114

 

—

 

629,008

 

1,443,000

 

16,880,122

 

18,323,122

 

(4,067,383

)

14,255,739

 

—

 

Copper Creek

 

Tempe, AZ

 

1984

 

144

 

1,017,400

 

9,148,068

 

—

 

1,009,013

 

1,017,400

 

10,157,080

 

11,174,480

 

(3,348,370

)

7,826,111

 

—

 

Copper Terrace

 

Orlando, FL

 

1989

 

300

 

1,200,000

 

17,887,868

 

—

 

1,719,808

 

1,200,000

 

19,607,676

 

20,807,676

 

(5,437,869

)

15,369,808

 

—

 

Cortona at Dana Park

 

Mesa, AZ

 

1986

 

222

 

2,028,939

 

12,466,128

 

—

 

1,465,594

 

2,028,939

 

13,931,723

 

15,960,662

 

(4,327,660

)

11,633,002

 

—

 

Country Brook

 

Chandler, AZ

 

1986-1996

 

396

 

1,505,219

 

29,542,535

 

—

 

1,736,604

 

1,505,219

 

31,279,138

 

32,784,357

 

(9,134,157

)

23,650,201

 

—

 

Country Gables

 

Beaverton, OR

 

1991

 

288

 

1,580,500

 

14,215,444

 

—

 

2,567,285

 

1,580,500

 

16,782,729

 

18,363,229

 

(5,787,770

)

12,575,459

 

—

 

Cove at Fishers Landing

 

Vancouver, WA

 

1993

 

253

 

2,277,000

 

15,656,887

 

—

 

607,222

 

2,277,000

 

16,264,109

 

18,541,109

 

(2,388,158

)

16,152,951

 

—

 

Creekside Homes at Legacy

 

Plano. TX

 

1998

 

380

 

4,560,000

 

32,275,748

 

—

 

1,638,131

 

4,560,000

 

33,913,879

 

38,473,879

 

(8,641,344

)

29,832,535

 

—

 

Creekside Village

 

Mountlake Terrace, WA

 

1987

 

512

 

2,807,600

 

25,270,594

 

—

 

3,076,578

 

2,807,600

 

28,347,171

 

31,154,771

 

(11,720,238

)

19,434,533

 

—

 

Creekwood

 

Charlotte, NC

 

1987-1990

 

384

 

1,861,700

 

16,740,569

 

—

 

1,962,482

 

1,861,700

 

18,703,050

 

20,564,750

 

(5,908,656

)

14,656,094

 

—

 

Crescent at Cherry Creek

 

Denver, CO

 

1994

 

216

 

2,594,000

 

15,149,470

 

—

 

930,946

 

2,594,000

 

16,080,416

 

18,674,416

 

(4,808,354

)

13,866,062

 

—

 

Crosswinds

 

St. Petersburg, FL

 

1986

 

208

 

1,561,200

 

5,756,822

 

—

 

1,291,783

 

1,561,200

 

7,048,605

 

8,609,805

 

(2,544,928

)

6,064,877

 

—

 

Crystal Village

 

Attleboro, MA

 

1974

 

91

 

1,369,000

 

4,989,028

 

—

 

1,970,405

 

1,369,000

 

6,959,433

 

8,328,433

 

(2,103,143

)

6,225,291

 

—

 

Cypress Lake at Waterford

 

Orlando, Fl

 

2001

 

316

 

7,000,000

 

27,654,816

 

—

 

533,701

 

7,000,000

 

28,188,517

 

35,188,517

 

(2,057,525

)

33,130,992

 

—

 

Dartmouth Woods

 

Lakewood, CO

 

1990

 

201

 

1,609,800

 

10,832,754

 

—

 

1,202,633

 

1,609,800

 

12,035,387

 

13,645,187

 

(3,887,727

)

9,757,460

 

—

 

Dean Estates

 

Taunton, MA

 

1984

 

58

 

498,080

 

3,329,560

 

—

 

342,044

 

498,080

 

3,671,605

 

4,169,684

 

(732,302

)

3,437,383

 

—

 

Deerbrook

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1983

 

144

 

1,008,000

 

8,845,716

 

—

 

1,073,706

 

1,008,000

 

9,919,423

 

10,927,423

 

(2,761,343

)

8,166,080

 

—

 

Deerwood (SD)

 

San Diego, CA

 

1990

 

316

 

2,082,095

 

18,739,815

 

—

 

5,102,503

 

2,082,095

 

23,842,318

 

25,924,413

 

(11,307,645

)

14,616,768

 

—

 

Defoor Village

 

Atlanta, GA

 

1997

 

156

 

2,966,400

 

10,570,210

 

—

 

1,709,169

 

2,966,400

 

12,279,379

 

15,245,779

 

(3,156,768

)

12,089,011

 

—

 

Desert Homes

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

1982

 

412

 

1,481,050

 

13,390,249

 

—

 

3,333,042

 

1,481,050

 

16,723,291

 

18,204,341

 

(6,430,603

)

11,773,738

 

—

 

Duraleigh Woods

 

Raleigh, NC

 

1987

 

362

 

1,629,000

 

19,917,750

 

—

 

2,915,729

 

1,629,000

 

22,833,479

 

24,462,479

 

(6,450,625

)

18,011,854

 

—

 

Eagle Canyon

 

Chino Hills, CA

 

1985

 

252

 

1,808,900

 

16,426,168

 

—

 

1,932,443

 

1,808,900

 

18,358,611

 

20,167,511

 

(6,044,841

)

14,122,670

 

—

 

Emerson Place

 

Boston, MA (G)

 

1962

 

444

 

14,855,000

 

57,566,636

 

—

 

11,992,182

 

14,855,000

 

69,558,817

 

84,413,817

 

(21,374,603

)

63,039,215

 

—

 

Emerson Place/CRP II

 

Boston, MA

 

(F)

 

—

 

—

 

5,126,486

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

5,126,486

 

5,126,486

 

—

 

5,126,486

 

—

 

Enclave at Winston Park

 

Coconut Creek, FL

 

1995

 

278

 

5,560,000

 

19,939,324

 

—

 

690,600

 

5,560,000

 

20,629,923

 

26,189,923

 

(3,087,745

)

23,102,178

 

—

 

Enclave, The

 

Tempe, AZ

 

1994

 

204

 

1,500,192

 

19,281,399

 

—

 

808,788

 

1,500,192

 

20,090,187

 

21,590,379

 

(5,700,710

)

15,889,669

 

—

 

EOP Orange

 

Orange, CA

 

(F)

 

—

 

—

 

517,113

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

517,113

 

517,113

 

—

 

517,113

 

—

 

Estates at Tanglewood

 

Westminster, CO

 

2003

 

504

 

7,560,000

 

51,256,538

 

—

 

333,329

 

7,560,000

 

51,589,867

 

59,149,867

 

(1,905,797

)

57,244,071

 

—

 

Fairfield

 

Stamford, CT (G)

 

1996

 

263

 

6,510,200

 

39,690,120

 

—

 

3,037,583

 

6,510,200

 

42,727,703

 

49,237,903

 

(11,038,731

)

38,199,173

 

—

 

Fairland Gardens

 

Silver Spring, MD

 

1981

 

400

 

6,000,000

 

19,972,183

 

—

 

3,255,810

 

6,000,000

 

23,227,993

 

29,227,993

 

(6,124,878

)

23,103,115

 

—

 

Fairway Greens, LLC

 

Pembroke Pines, FL

 

1987

 

49

 

291,326

 

3,239,538

 

—

 

733,964

 

291,326

 

3,973,502

 

4,264,828

 

(872,750

)

3,392,078

 

—

 

Farnham Park

 

Houston, TX

 

1996

 

216

 

1,512,600

 

14,233,760

 

—

 

836,334

 

1,512,600

 

15,070,094

 

16,582,694

 

(4,360,059

)

12,222,635

 

—

 

Fifth Avenue North

 

Seattle, WA (G)

 

2002

 

62

 

4,356,000

 

7,405,327

 

—

 

22

 

4,356,000

 

7,405,350

 

11,761,350

 

—

 

11,761,350

 

—

 

Four Lakes Athletic Club

 

Lisle, IL (G)

 

N/A

 

—

 

50,000

 

153,489

 

—

 

227,651

 

50,000

 

381,140

 

431,140

 

(58,289

)

372,850

 

—

 

Four Lakes Condo, LLC Phase VI

 

Lisle, IL

 

1970/1988

 

1

 

1,971

 

11,845

 

—

 

(19,440

)

1,971

 

(7,595

)

(5,624

)

(19,265

)

(24,889

)

—

 

Four Lakes Condo, LLC Phase VIII

 

Lisle, IL

 

1970/1988

 

45

 

119,801

 

704,976

 

—

 

2,248,109

 

119,801

 

2,953,085

 

3,072,886

 

(1,171,436

)

1,901,450

 

—

 

Four Lakes Leasing Center

 

Lisle, IL (G)

 

N/A

 

—

 

50,000

 

152,815

 

—

 

41,649

 

50,000

 

194,464

 

244,464

 

(65,146

)

179,318

 

—

 

Fox Run (WA)

 

Federal Way, WA

 

1988

 

144

 

639,700

 

5,765,018

 

—

 

1,126,426

 

639,700

 

6,891,444

 

7,531,144

 

(3,007,509

)

4,523,635

 

—

 

Fox Run II (WA)

 

Federal Way, WA

 

1988

 

18

 

80,000

 

1,286,139

 

—

 

53,086

 

80,000

 

1,339,225

 

1,419,225

 

(126,410

)

1,292,816

 

—

 

Foxcroft

 

Scarborough, ME

 

1977/1979

 

104

 

523,400

 

4,527,409

 

—

 

742,262

 

523,400

 

5,269,671

 

5,793,071

 

(1,588,826

)

4,204,245

 

—

 

Gables Grand Plaza

 

Coral Gables, FL (G)

 

1998

 

195

 

—

 

44,601,000

 

—

 

769,410

 

—

 

45,370,410

 

45,370,410

 

(3,497,204

)

41,873,206

 

—

 

Gatehouse at Pine Lake

 

Pembroke Pines, FL

 

1990

 

296

 

1,896,600

 

17,070,795

 

—

 

1,614,683

 

1,896,600

 

18,685,477

 

20,582,077

 

(6,353,796

)

14,228,282

 

—

 

Gatehouse on the Green

 

Plantation, FL

 

1990

 

312

 

2,228,200

 

20,056,270

 

—

 

2,050,349

 

2,228,200

 

22,106,619

 

24,334,819

 

(7,507,216

)

16,827,603

 

—

 

Gates of Redmond

 

Redmond, WA

 

1979

 

180

 

2,306,100

 

12,064,015

 

—

 

1,129,173

 

2,306,100

 

13,193,189

 

15,499,289

 

(4,072,328

)

11,426,961

 

—

 

Gateway at Malden Center

 

Malden, MA (G)

 

1988

 

203

 

9,209,780

 

25,722,666

 

—

 

2,235,818

 

9,209,780

 

27,958,484

 

37,168,264

 

(2,921,151

)

34,247,113

 

—

 

Gatewood

 

Pleasanton, CA

 

1985

 

200

 

6,796,511

 

20,249,392

 

—

 

1,175,772

 

6,796,511

 

21,425,164

 

28,221,675

 

(2,117,972

)

26,103,703

 

—

 

Glastonbury Center

 

Glastonbury, CT

 

1962

 

105

 

852,606

 

5,699,497

 

—

 

489,326

 

852,606

 

6,188,824

 

7,041,430

 

(1,275,820

)

5,765,610

 

—

 

Gore Meadows

 

Watertown, MA

 

(F)

 

—

 

—

 

163,697

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

163,697

 

163,697

 

—

 

163,697

 

—

 

Gramercy Park

 

Houston, TX

 

1998

 

384

 

3,957,000

 

22,075,243

 

—

 

1,579,821

 

3,957,000

 

23,655,064

 

27,612,064

 

(3,787,274

)

23,824,789

 

—

 

Granada Highlands

 

Malden, MA (G)

 

1972

 

919

 

28,210,000

 

99,944,576

 

—

 

14,201,437

 

28,210,000

 

114,146,014

 

142,356,014

 

(25,668,487

)

116,687,527

 

—

 

Grand Marquis Condominium, LLC

 

Plantation, FL

 

1987

 

16

 

75,158

 

748,261

 

—

 

321,525

 

75,158

 

1,069,786

 

1,144,944

 

(336,567

)

808,377

 

—

 

Grand Reserve

 

Woodbury, MN

 

2000

 

394

 

4,728,000

 

49,541,642

 

—

 

4,691,469

 

4,728,000

 

54,233,111

 

58,961,111

 

(9,728,093

)

49,233,018

 

—

 

Grandeville at River Place

 

Oviedo, FL

 

2002

 

280

 

6,000,000

 

23,114,693

 

—

 

165,331

 

6,000,000

 

23,280,024

 

29,280,024

 

(1,945,635

)

27,334,389

 

—

 

Greenfield Village

 

Rocky Hill, CT

 

1965

 

151

 

911,534

 

6,093,418

 

—

 

409,743

 

911,534

 

6,503,162

 

7,414,696

 

(1,282,444

)

6,132,252

 

—

 

Greentree 2

 

Glen Burnie, MD

 

1973

 

239

 

2,700,000

 

8,246,737

 

—

 

1,308,659

 

2,700,000

 

9,555,396

 

12,255,396

 

(2,561,069

)

9,694,327

 

—

 

Greentree 3

 

Glen Burnie, MD

 

1973

 

207

 

2,380,443

 

7,270,294

 

—

 

1,049,351

 

2,380,443

 

8,319,645

 

10,700,088

 

(2,236,072

)

8,464,017

 

—

 

Hammocks Place

 

Miami, FL

 

1986

 

296

 

319,180

 

12,513,467

 

—

 

1,801,039

 

319,180

 

14,314,505

 

14,633,685

 

(6,466,582

)

8,167,103

 

—

 

Hamptons

 

Puyallup, WA

 

1991

 

230

 

1,119,200

 

10,075,844

 

—

 

1,138,627

 

1,119,200

 

11,214,471

 

12,333,671

 

(3,656,560

)

8,677,111

 

—

 

Harborview

 

San Pedro, CA

 

1985

 

160

 

6,402,500

 

12,627,347

 

—

 

1,368,570

 

6,402,500

 

13,995,917

 

20,398,417

 

(4,556,566

)

15,841,851

 

—

 

Harbour Town

 

Boca Raton, FL

 

1985

 

392

 

11,760,000

 

20,190,252

 

—

 

3,851,611

 

11,760,000

 

24,041,863

 

35,801,863

 

(5,828,281

)

29,973,582

 

—

 

Hathaway

 

Long Beach, CA

 

1987

 

385

 

2,512,500

 

22,611,912

 

—

 

3,598,613

 

2,512,500

 

26,210,525

 

28,723,025

 

(9,682,675

)

19,040,350

 

—

 

Heritage, The

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

1995

 

204

 

1,211,205

 

13,136,903

 

—

 

792,882

 

1,211,205

 

13,929,785

 

15,140,990

 

(4,064,977

)

11,076,013

 

—

 

Heron Pointe

 

Boynton Beach, FL

 

1989

 

192

 

1,546,700

 

7,774,676

 

—

 

1,187,942

 

1,546,700

 

8,962,618

 

10,509,318

 

(3,083,513

)

7,425,805

 

—

 

Hidden Lakes

 

Haltom City, TX

 

1996

 

312

 

1,872,000

 

20,242,109

 

—

 

1,088,084

 

1,872,000

 

21,330,193

 

23,202,193

 

(5,700,435

)

17,501,758

 

—

 

Hidden Oaks

 

Cary, NC

 

1988

 

216

 

1,178,600

 

10,614,135

 

—

 

1,818,988

 

1,178,600

 

12,433,124

 

13,611,724

 

(4,133,288

)

9,478,436

 

—

 

Hidden Palms

 

Tampa, FL

 

1986

 

256

 

2,049,600

 

6,345,885

 

—

 

1,758,702

 

2,049,600

 

8,104,587

 

10,154,187

 

(2,886,723

)

7,267,465

 

—

 

Hidden Valley Club

 

Ann Arbor, MI

 

1973

 

324

 

915,000

 

6,667,098

 

—

 

3,572,015

 

915,000

 

10,239,113

 

11,154,113

 

(7,781,952

)

3,372,161

 

—

 

Highland Glen

 

Westwood, MA

 

1979

 

180

 

2,229,095

 

16,828,153

 

—

 

507,676

 

2,229,095

 

17,335,829

 

19,564,924

 

(3,131,260

)

16,433,664

 

—

 

 

S-5



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

Highland Glen II

 

Westwood, MA

 

(F)

 

—

 

603,508

 

1,393,366

 

—

 

—

 

603,508

 

1,393,366

 

1,996,874

 

—

 

1,996,874

 

—

 

Hudson Crossing

 

New York, NY (G)

 

2003

 

259

 

23,420,000

 

70,085,463

 

—

 

95,870

 

23,420,000

 

70,181,333

 

93,601,333

 

(3,691,733

)

89,909,600

 

—

 

Hudson Pointe

 

Jersey City, NJ

 

2003

 

182

 

5,148,500

 

41,013,460

 

—

 

196,625

 

5,148,500

 

41,210,085

 

46,358,584

 

(2,771,178

)

43,587,407

 

—

 

Hunt Club

 

Charlotte, NC

 

1990

 

300

 

990,000

 

17,992,887

 

—

 

1,050,373

 

990,000

 

19,043,260

 

20,033,260

 

(5,122,739

)

14,910,521

 

—

 

Hunt Club II

 

Charlotte, NC

 

(F)

 

—

 

100,000

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

100,000

 

—

 

100,000

 

—

 

100,000

 

—

 

Hunters Green

 

Fort Worth, TX

 

1981

 

248

 

524,300

 

3,653,481

 

—

 

1,457,415

 

524,300

 

5,110,896

 

5,635,196

 

(2,592,277

)

3,042,918

 

—

 

Huntington Park

 

Everett, WA

 

1991

 

381

 

1,597,500

 

14,367,864

 

—

 

1,765,661

 

1,597,500

 

16,133,525

 

17,731,025

 

(7,130,920

)

10,600,104

 

—

 

Indian Bend

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1973

 

277

 

1,075,700

 

9,800,330

 

—

 

2,428,895

 

1,075,700

 

12,229,224

 

13,304,924

 

(5,534,189

)

7,770,735

 

—

 

Indian Tree

 

Arvada, CO

 

1983

 

168

 

881,225

 

4,552,815

 

—

 

1,713,192

 

881,225

 

6,266,007

 

7,147,232

 

(3,091,683

)

4,055,548

 

—

 

Indigo Springs

 

Kent, WA

 

1991

 

278

 

1,270,500

 

11,446,902

 

—

 

2,101,428

 

1,270,500

 

13,548,330

 

14,818,830

 

(4,836,088

)

9,982,742

 

—

 

Ironwood at the Ranch

 

Westminster, CO

 

1986

 

226

 

1,493,300

 

13,439,305

 

—

 

1,213,593

 

1,493,300

 

14,652,897

 

16,146,197

 

(4,728,482

)

11,417,715

 

—

 

Ivory Wood

 

Bothell, WA

 

2000

 

144

 

2,732,800

 

13,888,282

 

—

 

197,549

 

2,732,800

 

14,085,831

 

16,818,631

 

(969,012

)

15,849,619

 

—

 

Ivy Place

 

Atlanta, GA

 

1978

 

122

 

802,950

 

7,228,257

 

—

 

1,372,744

 

802,950

 

8,601,000

 

9,403,950

 

(3,148,873

)

6,255,078

 

—

 

Junipers at Yarmouth

 

Yarmouth, ME

 

1970

 

225

 

1,355,700

 

7,860,135

 

—

 

1,551,315

 

1,355,700

 

9,411,449

 

10,767,149

 

(3,347,613

)

7,419,536

 

—

 

Kempton Downs

 

Gresham, OR

 

1990

 

278

 

1,217,349

 

10,943,372

 

—

 

2,101,442

 

1,217,349

 

13,044,814

 

14,262,163

 

(5,403,829

)

8,858,334

 

—

 

Keystone

 

Austin, TX

 

1981

 

166

 

498,500

 

4,487,295

 

—

 

1,490,410

 

498,500

 

5,977,705

 

6,476,205

 

(2,702,594

)

3,773,611

 

—

 

Kingsport

 

Alexandria, VA

 

1986

 

416

 

1,262,250

 

12,198,188

 

—

 

3,599,481

 

1,262,250

 

15,797,670

 

17,059,920

 

(6,616,975

)

10,442,945

 

—

 

Kirby Place

 

Houston, TX

 

1994

 

362

 

3,621,600

 

25,896,774

 

—

 

1,652,070

 

3,621,600

 

27,548,844

 

31,170,444

 

(8,207,953

)

22,962,491

 

—

 

La Mirage

 

San Diego, CA

 

1988/1992

 

1,070

 

28,895,200

 

95,567,943

 

—

 

5,994,192

 

28,895,200

 

101,562,135

 

130,457,335

 

(30,890,100

)

99,567,234

 

—

 

La Mirage IV

 

San Diego, CA

 

2001

 

340

 

6,000,000

 

47,449,353

 

—

 

464,988

 

6,000,000

 

47,914,341

 

53,914,341

 

(7,036,847

)

46,877,495

 

—

 

La Tour Fontaine

 

Houston, TX

 

1994

 

162

 

2,916,000

 

15,917,178

 

—

 

1,068,964

 

2,916,000

 

16,986,142

 

19,902,142

 

(4,481,611

)

15,420,531

 

—

 

Lakes at Vinings

 

Atlanta, GA

 

1972/1975

 

464

 

6,498,000

 

21,832,252

 

—

 

2,549,864

 

6,498,000

 

24,382,116

 

30,880,116

 

(7,116,810

)

23,763,306

 

—

 

Lakeshore at Preston

 

Plano, TX

 

1992

 

302

 

3,325,800

 

15,208,348

 

—

 

1,696,948

 

3,325,800

 

16,905,296

 

20,231,096

 

(4,611,232

)

15,619,864

 

—

 

Lakeville Resort

 

Petaluma, CA

 

1984

 

492

 

2,736,500

 

24,610,651

 

—

 

3,581,861

 

2,736,500

 

28,192,512

 

30,929,012

 

(9,878,000

)

21,051,012

 

—

 

Lakewood Oaks

 

Dallas, TX

 

1987

 

352

 

1,631,600

 

14,686,192

 

—

 

2,758,915

 

1,631,600

 

17,445,106

 

19,076,706

 

(7,252,999

)

11,823,707

 

—

 

Landera

 

San Antonio, TX

 

1983

 

184

 

766,300

 

6,896,811

 

—

 

1,276,292

 

766,300

 

8,173,104

 

8,939,404

 

(2,898,389

)

6,041,015

 

—

 

Landings at Port Imperial

 

W. New York, NJ

 

1999

 

276

 

27,246,045

 

37,741,050

 

—

 

690,954

 

27,246,045

 

38,432,003

 

65,678,048

 

(6,838,180

)

58,839,869

 

—

 

Larkspur Shores

 

Hilliard, OH

 

1983

 

342

 

17,107,300

 

31,399,237

 

—

 

4,028,222

 

17,107,300

 

35,427,459

 

52,534,759

 

(10,501,853

)

42,032,906

 

—

 

Larkspur Woods

 

Sacramento, CA

 

1989/1993

 

232

 

5,802,900

 

14,576,106

 

—

 

1,462,557

 

5,802,900

 

16,038,663

 

21,841,563

 

(4,916,809

)

16,924,754

 

—

 

Laurel Ridge

 

Chapel Hill, NC

 

1975

 

160

 

160,000

 

3,206,076

 

—

 

3,760,997

 

160,000

 

6,967,073

 

7,127,073

 

(4,618,612

)

2,508,461

 

—

 

Laurel Ridge II

 

Chapel Hill, NC

 

(F)

 

—

 

22,551

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

22,551

 

—

 

22,551

 

—

 

22,551

 

—

 

Lexington Farm

 

Alpharetta, GA

 

1995

 

352

 

3,521,900

 

22,888,305

 

—

 

1,100,890

 

3,521,900

 

23,989,195

 

27,511,095

 

(6,270,768

)

21,240,327

 

—

 

Lexington Glen

 

Atlanta, GA

 

1990

 

480

 

5,760,000

 

40,190,507

 

—

 

2,833,875

 

5,760,000

 

43,024,383

 

48,784,383

 

(11,261,541

)

37,522,842

 

—

 

Lexington Park

 

Orlando, FL

 

1988

 

252

 

2,016,000

 

12,346,726

 

—

 

1,852,134

 

2,016,000

 

14,198,859

 

16,214,859

 

(3,937,306

)

12,277,554

 

—

 

Little Cottonwoods

 

Tempe, AZ

 

1984

 

379

 

3,050,133

 

26,991,689

 

—

 

2,193,290

 

3,050,133

 

29,184,979

 

32,235,112

 

(8,595,903

)

23,639,209

 

—

 

Lodge (TX), The

 

San Antonio, TX

 

1989/1990

 

384

 

1,363,636

 

7,464,586

 

—

 

3,374,871

 

1,363,636

 

10,839,457

 

12,203,093

 

(6,541,900

)

5,661,193

 

—

 

Lofton Place

 

Tampa, FL

 

1988

 

280

 

2,240,000

 

16,679,214

 

—

 

1,738,399

 

2,240,000

 

18,417,613

 

20,657,613

 

(5,064,360

)

15,593,253

 

—

 

Longfellow Place

 

Boston, MA (G)

 

1975

 

710

 

53,164,160

 

183,940,619

 

—

 

26,794,593

 

53,164,160

 

210,735,211

 

263,899,371

 

(51,170,920

)

212,728,451

 

—

 

Madison at Stone Creek

 

Austin, TX

 

1995

 

390

 

2,535,000

 

22,611,700

 

—

 

1,559,341

 

2,535,000

 

24,171,040

 

26,706,040

 

(6,479,251

)

20,226,789

 

—

 

Madison at the Arboretum

 

Austin, TX

 

1995

 

161

 

1,046,500

 

9,638,269

 

—

 

1,392,343

 

1,046,500

 

11,030,612

 

12,077,112

 

(2,957,699

)

9,119,413

 

—

 

Madison at Walnut Creek

 

Austin, TX

 

1994

 

342

 

2,737,600

 

14,623,574

 

—

 

1,626,595

 

2,737,600

 

16,250,169

 

18,987,769

 

(5,144,809

)

13,842,960

 

—

 

Madison at Wells Branch

 

Austin, TX

 

1995

 

300

 

2,377,344

 

16,370,879

 

—

 

1,683,447

 

2,377,344

 

18,054,326

 

20,431,670

 

(3,860,939

)

16,570,731

 

—

 

Madison on Melrose

 

Richardson, TX

 

1995

 

200

 

1,300,000

 

15,096,551

 

—

 

685,221

 

1,300,000

 

15,781,772

 

17,081,772

 

(4,079,103

)

13,002,669

 

—

 

Madison on the Parkway

 

Dallas, TX

 

1995

 

376

 

2,444,000

 

22,505,043

 

—

 

1,784,163

 

2,444,000

 

24,289,206

 

26,733,206

 

(6,385,278

)

20,347,929

 

—

 

Magnolia at Whitlock

 

Marietta, GA

 

1971

 

152

 

132,979

 

1,526,005

 

—

 

3,683,712

 

132,979

 

5,209,717

 

5,342,695

 

(3,232,178

)

2,110,517

 

—

 

Magnuson Pointe, LLC

 

Seattle, WA

 

1977/1979

 

70

 

1,863,274

 

4,969,836

 

—

 

298,644

 

1,863,274

 

5,268,480

 

7,131,754

 

—

 

7,131,754

 

—

 

Mariners Wharf

 

Orange Park, FL

 

1989

 

272

 

1,861,200

 

16,744,951

 

—

 

1,342,198

 

1,861,200

 

18,087,149

 

19,948,349

 

(5,475,079

)

14,473,270

 

—

 

Marquessa

 

Corona Hills, CA

 

1992

 

336

 

6,888,500

 

21,604,584

 

—

 

1,929,438

 

6,888,500

 

23,534,021

 

30,422,521

 

(7,170,385

)

23,252,136

 

—

 

Martha Lake

 

Lynnwood, WA

 

1991

 

155

 

821,200

 

7,405,070

 

—

 

1,396,846

 

821,200

 

8,801,916

 

9,623,116

 

(2,927,813

)

6,695,303

 

—

 

Merrill Creek

 

Lakewood, WA

 

1994

 

149

 

814,200

 

7,330,606

 

—

 

582,401

 

814,200

 

7,913,006

 

8,727,206

 

(2,514,485

)

6,212,721

 

—

 

Metro on First

 

Seattle, WA (G)

 

2002

 

102

 

8,540,000

 

12,209,975

 

—

 

17,144

 

8,540,000

 

12,227,118

 

20,767,118

 

(346,916

)

20,420,202

 

—

 

Milano Terrace Private Residences

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1984

 

214

 

2,932,387

 

17,570,698

 

—

 

2,741,193

 

2,932,387

 

20,311,892

 

23,244,279

 

(5,239,199

)

18,005,080

 

—

 

Mill Creek

 

Milpitas, CA

 

1991

 

516

 

12,858,693

 

57,168,503

 

—

 

1,164,011

 

12,858,693

 

58,332,514

 

71,191,207

 

(5,908,345

)

65,282,863

 

—

 

Mira Flores

 

Palm Beach Gardens, FL

 

1996

 

352

 

7,040,000

 

22,515,299

 

—

 

699,076

 

7,040,000

 

23,214,375

 

30,254,375

 

(3,611,351

)

26,643,024

 

—

 

Mission Bay

 

Orlando, FL

 

1991

 

304

 

2,432,000

 

21,623,560

 

—

 

1,340,332

 

2,432,000

 

22,963,893

 

25,395,893

 

(6,130,111

)

19,265,782

 

—

 

Misty Woods

 

Cary, NC

 

1984

 

360

 

720,790

 

18,063,934

 

—

 

2,496,242

 

720,790

 

20,560,176

 

21,280,966

 

(6,264,017

)

15,016,949

 

—

 

Montecito

 

Valencia, CA

 

1999

 

210

 

8,400,000

 

24,709,146

 

—

 

867,469

 

8,400,000

 

25,576,615

 

33,976,615

 

(4,549,147

)

29,427,467

 

—

 

Monterra in Mill Creek

 

Mill Creek, WA

 

2003

 

139

 

2,800,000

 

13,255,123

 

—

 

77,941

 

2,800,000

 

13,333,064

 

16,133,064

 

(633,721

)

15,499,343

 

—

 

Montevista

 

Dallas, TX

 

2000

 

350

 

3,931,550

 

19,788,568

 

—

 

925,046

 

3,931,550

 

20,713,614

 

24,645,164

 

(3,147,201

)

21,497,963

 

—

 

Morningside

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1989

 

160

 

670,470

 

12,607,976

 

—

 

959,190

 

670,470

 

13,567,166

 

14,237,636

 

(3,996,113

)

10,241,523

 

—

 

Mountain Park Ranch

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

1994

 

240

 

1,662,332

 

18,260,276

 

—

 

1,133,848

 

1,662,332

 

19,394,124

 

21,056,456

 

(5,731,425

)

15,325,031

 

—

 

Mountain Terrace

 

Stevenson Ranch, CA

 

1992

 

510

 

3,966,500

 

35,814,995

 

—

 

2,200,950

 

3,966,500

 

38,015,945

 

41,982,445

 

(12,256,891

)

29,725,554

 

—

 

Newport Heights

 

Tukwila, WA

 

1985

 

80

 

391,200

 

3,522,780

 

—

 

712,179

 

391,200

 

4,234,959

 

4,626,159

 

(1,857,561

)

2,768,598

 

—

 

North Pier at Harborside

 

Jersey City, NJ

 

2003

 

297

 

4,000,159

 

93,755,410

 

—

 

178,051

 

4,000,159

 

93,933,461

 

97,933,620

 

(5,958,662

)

91,974,958

 

—

 

Northampton 2

 

Largo, MD

 

1988

 

276

 

1,513,500

 

14,246,990

 

—

 

2,128,557

 

1,513,500

 

16,375,548

 

17,889,048

 

(6,767,303

)

11,121,744

 

—

 

Northlake (MD)

 

Germantown, MD

 

1985

 

304

 

15,000,000

 

23,143,103

 

—

 

60,766

 

15,000,000

 

23,203,869

 

38,203,869

 

(429,967

)

37,773,901

 

—

 

Northridge

 

Pleasant Hill, CA

 

1974

 

221

 

5,527,800

 

14,691,705

 

—

 

2,071,280

 

5,527,800

 

16,762,985

 

22,290,785

 

(5,027,945

)

17,262,839

 

—

 

Northwoods Village

 

Cary, NC

 

1986

 

228

 

1,369,700

 

11,460,337

 

—

 

1,916,694

 

1,369,700

 

13,377,031

 

14,746,731

 

(4,425,686

)

10,321,045

 

—

 

Oaks (NC)

 

Charlotte, NC

 

1996

 

318

 

2,196,744

 

23,601,540

 

—

 

684,111

 

2,196,744

 

24,285,650

 

26,482,394

 

(6,278,935

)

20,203,460

 

—

 

Oaks at Falls Church Condominium Homes, The

 

Falls Church, VA

 

1966

 

176

 

20,240,000

 

20,152,616

 

—

 

—

 

20,240,000

 

20,152,616

 

40,392,616

 

—

 

40,392,616

 

—

 

Oakwood Village (FL) II

 

Hudson, FL

 

(F)

 

—

 

31,734

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

31,734

 

—

 

31,734

 

—

 

31,734

 

—

 

 

S-6



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

Ocean Crest

 

Solana Beach, CA

 

1986

 

146

 

5,111,200

 

11,910,438

 

—

 

983,318

 

5,111,200

 

12,893,756

 

18,004,956

 

(3,543,176

)

14,461,780

 

—

 

Olympus Towers

 

Seattle, WA (G)

 

2000

 

328

 

14,752,034

 

73,376,841

 

—

 

228,350

 

14,752,034

 

73,605,191

 

88,357,225

 

(5,531,126

)

82,826,099

 

—

 

One Eton Square

 

Tulsa, OK

 

1985

 

448

 

1,570,100

 

14,130,937

 

—

 

3,173,186

 

1,570,100

 

17,304,123

 

18,874,223

 

(6,085,925

)

12,788,298

 

—

 

Orchard Ridge

 

Lynnwood, WA

 

1988

 

104

 

480,600

 

4,372,033

 

—

 

751,261

 

480,600

 

5,123,294

 

5,603,894

 

(2,202,754

)

3,401,140

 

—

 

Overlook Manor

 

Frederick, MD

 

1980/1985

 

108

 

1,299,100

 

3,930,931

 

—

 

1,365,082

 

1,299,100

 

5,296,013

 

6,595,113

 

(1,609,010

)

4,986,103

 

—

 

Overlook Manor III

 

Frederick, MD

 

1980/1985

 

64

 

1,026,300

 

3,027,390

 

—

 

195,699

 

1,026,300

 

3,223,088

 

4,249,388

 

(904,592

)

3,344,797

 

—

 

Paces Station

 

Atlanta, GA

 

1984-1988/1989

 

610

 

4,801,500

 

32,548,053

 

—

 

5,380,415

 

4,801,500

 

37,928,468

 

42,729,968

 

(12,594,812

)

30,135,156

 

—

 

Palladia

 

Hillsboro, OR

 

2000

 

497

 

6,461,000

 

44,888,156

 

—

 

669,497

 

6,461,000

 

45,557,653

 

52,018,653

 

(7,576,376

)

44,442,277

 

—

 

Panther Ridge

 

Federal Way, WA

 

1980

 

260

 

1,055,800

 

9,506,117

 

—

 

1,241,235

 

1,055,800

 

10,747,352

 

11,803,152

 

(3,748,614

)

8,054,538

 

—

 

Paradise Pointe

 

Dania, FL

 

1987-90

 

320

 

1,913,414

 

17,417,956

 

—

 

3,698,734

 

1,913,414

 

21,116,690

 

23,030,104

 

(8,605,728

)

14,424,377

 

—

 

Parc Royale

 

Houston, TX

 

1994

 

171

 

2,223,000

 

11,936,833

 

—

 

1,505,045

 

2,223,000

 

13,441,877

 

15,664,877

 

(3,642,395

)

12,022,482

 

—

 

Parc Vue at Lake Buena Vista

 

Orlando, FL

 

2000/2002

 

336

 

11,760,000

 

34,514,875

 

—

 

—

 

11,760,000

 

34,514,875

 

46,274,875

 

—

 

46,274,875

 

—

 

Park Meadow

 

Gilbert, AZ

 

1986

 

224

 

835,217

 

15,120,769

 

—

 

1,443,425

 

835,217

 

16,564,194

 

17,399,411

 

(4,866,585

)

12,532,826

 

—

 

Park Place (MN)

 

Plymouth, MN

 

1986

 

250

 

1,219,900

 

10,964,119

 

—

 

1,889,115

 

1,219,900

 

12,853,235

 

14,073,135

 

(4,660,213

)

9,412,921

 

—

 

Park Place (TX)

 

Houston, TX

 

1996

 

229

 

1,603,000

 

12,054,926

 

—

 

819,718

 

1,603,000

 

12,874,644

 

14,477,644

 

(3,764,421

)

10,713,223

 

—

 

Park Place II

 

Plymouth, MN

 

1986

 

250

 

1,216,100

 

10,951,698

 

—

 

1,698,395

 

1,216,100

 

12,650,092

 

13,866,192

 

(4,481,734

)

9,384,459

 

—

 

Park West (CA)

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

1987/90

 

444

 

3,033,500

 

27,302,383

 

—

 

3,090,186

 

3,033,500

 

30,392,569

 

33,426,069

 

(11,569,341

)

21,856,728

 

—

 

Parkfield

 

Denver, CO

 

2000

 

476

 

8,330,000

 

28,667,618

 

—

 

881,555

 

8,330,000

 

29,549,173

 

37,879,173

 

(5,449,605

)

32,429,568

 

—

 

Parkside

 

Union City, CA

 

1979

 

208

 

6,246,700

 

11,827,453

 

—

 

2,723,933

 

6,246,700

 

14,551,385

 

20,798,085

 

(4,555,670

)

16,242,415

 

—

 

Parkview Terrace

 

Redlands, CA

 

1986

 

558

 

4,969,200

 

35,653,777

 

—

 

5,364,254

 

4,969,200

 

41,018,031

 

45,987,231

 

(11,387,100

)

34,600,131

 

—

 

Parkwood (CT)

 

East Haven, CT

 

1975

 

102

 

531,365

 

3,552,064

 

—

 

268,856

 

531,365

 

3,820,920

 

4,352,284

 

(793,361

)

3,558,923

 

—

 

Pine Harbour

 

Orlando, FL

 

1991

 

366

 

1,664,300

 

14,970,915

 

—

 

2,433,586

 

1,664,300

 

17,404,501

 

19,068,801

 

(7,641,257

)

11,427,544

 

—

 

Pointe at South Mountain

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

1988

 

364

 

2,228,800

 

20,059,311

 

—

 

2,062,116

 

2,228,800

 

22,121,427

 

24,350,227

 

(7,199,253

)

17,150,974

 

—

 

Polos East

 

Orlando, FL

 

1991

 

308

 

1,386,000

 

19,058,620

 

—

 

1,292,129

 

1,386,000

 

20,350,749

 

21,736,749

 

(5,453,126

)

16,283,623

 

—

 

Port Royale

 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL (G)

 

1988

 

252

 

1,754,200

 

15,789,873

 

—

 

2,928,760

 

1,754,200

 

18,718,633

 

20,472,833

 

(7,470,287

)

13,002,546

 

—

 

Port Royale II

 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL (G)

 

1988

 

161

 

1,022,200

 

9,203,166

 

—

 

1,840,466

 

1,022,200

 

11,043,632

 

12,065,832

 

(4,025,598

)

8,040,234

 

—

 

Port Royale III

 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL (G)

 

1988

 

324

 

7,454,900

 

14,725,802

 

—

 

3,176,527

 

7,454,900

 

17,902,329

 

25,357,229

 

(5,819,347

)

19,537,882

 

—

 

Port Royale IV

 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

 

(F)

 

—

 

—

 

26,895

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

26,895

 

26,895

 

—

 

26,895

 

—

 

Portofino

 

Chino Hills, CA

 

1989

 

176

 

3,572,400

 

14,660,994

 

—

 

1,076,497

 

3,572,400

 

15,737,491

 

19,309,891

 

(4,567,060

)

14,742,831

 

—

 

Preakness

 

Antioch, TN

 

1986

 

260

 

1,561,900

 

7,668,521

 

—

 

2,009,434

 

1,561,900

 

9,677,955

 

11,239,855

 

(3,532,829

)

7,707,026

 

—

 

Preserve at Deer Creek

 

Deerfield Beach, FL

 

1997

 

540

 

13,500,000

 

60,011,208

 

—

 

441,855

 

13,500,000

 

60,453,063

 

73,953,063

 

(4,709,294

)

69,243,769

 

—

 

Promenade (FL)

 

St. Petersburg, FL

 

1994

 

334

 

2,124,193

 

25,804,037

 

—

 

2,865,120

 

2,124,193

 

28,669,157

 

30,793,351

 

(7,551,877

)

23,241,473

 

—

 

Promenade at Aventura

 

Aventura, FL

 

1995

 

296

 

13,320,000

 

30,353,748

 

—

 

1,092,095

 

13,320,000

 

31,445,843

 

44,765,843

 

(5,733,296

)

39,032,548

 

—

 

Promenade at Peachtree

 

Chamblee, GA

 

2001

 

406

 

10,150,000

 

31,219,739

 

—

 

303,712

 

10,150,000

 

31,523,451

 

41,673,451

 

(2,063,019

)

39,610,432

 

—

 

Promenade at Town Center I

 

Valencia, CA

 

2001

 

294

 

14,700,000

 

35,390,279

 

—

 

616,015

 

14,700,000

 

36,006,293

 

50,706,293

 

(2,935,616

)

47,770,677

 

—

 

Promenade at Wyndham Lakes

 

Coral Springs, FL

 

1998

 

332

 

6,640,000

 

26,743,760

 

—

 

925,841

 

6,640,000

 

27,669,601

 

34,309,601

 

(5,530,748

)

28,778,853

 

—

 

Promenade Terrace

 

Corona, CA

 

1990

 

330

 

2,272,800

 

20,546,289

 

—

 

2,756,734

 

2,272,800

 

23,303,024

 

25,575,824

 

(8,009,099

)

17,566,725

 

—

 

Promontory Pointe I & II

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

1984/1996

 

424

 

2,355,509

 

30,421,840

 

—

 

2,254,952

 

2,355,509

 

32,676,791

 

35,032,300

 

(9,660,616

)

25,371,684

 

—

 

Prospect Towers

 

Hackensack, NJ

 

1995

 

157

 

3,926,600

 

27,966,416

 

—

 

2,636,038

 

3,926,600

 

30,602,454

 

34,529,054

 

(8,763,035

)

25,766,019

 

—

 

Prospect Towers II

 

Hackensack, NJ

 

2002

 

203

 

4,500,000

 

33,104,733

 

—

 

636,892

 

4,500,000

 

33,741,624

 

38,241,624

 

(4,328,810

)

33,912,814

 

—

 

Providence

 

Bothell, WA

 

2000

 

200

 

3,573,621

 

19,055,505

 

—

 

136,060

 

3,573,621

 

19,191,565

 

22,765,186

 

(1,556,212

)

21,208,974

 

—

 

Ranch at Fossil Creek

 

Haltom City, TX

 

2003

 

274

 

1,715,435

 

16,829,282

 

—

 

234,797

 

1,715,435

 

17,064,079

 

18,779,514

 

(1,560,807

)

17,218,707

 

—

 

Redlands Lawn and Tennis

 

Redlands, CA

 

1986

 

496

 

4,822,320

 

26,359,328

 

—

 

2,534,852

 

4,822,320

 

28,894,180

 

33,716,500

 

(8,713,485

)

25,003,016

 

—

 

Redmond Ridge (Land)

 

Redmond, WA

 

(F)

 

—

 

—

 

778,219

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

778,219

 

778,219

 

—

 

778,219

 

—

 

Regency

 

Charlotte, NC

 

1986

 

178

 

890,000

 

11,783,920

 

—

 

992,171

 

890,000

 

12,776,091

 

13,666,091

 

(3,462,335

)

10,203,756

 

—

 

Regency Palms

 

Huntington Beach, CA

 

1969

 

310

 

1,857,400

 

16,713,254

 

—

 

2,824,700

 

1,857,400

 

19,537,954

 

21,395,354

 

(7,222,157

)

14,173,197

 

—

 

Regency Park Condominium Homes

 

Centreville, VA

 

1989

 

252

 

2,521,500

 

16,200,666

 

—

 

2,077,099

 

2,521,500

 

18,277,765

 

20,799,265

 

(5,420,612

)

15,378,653

 

—

 

Remington Place

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

1983

 

412

 

1,492,750

 

13,377,478

 

—

 

3,223,404

 

1,492,750

 

16,600,883

 

18,093,633

 

(6,487,300

)

11,606,333

 

—

 

Reserve at Clarendon Centre, The

 

Arlington, VA (G)

 

2003

 

252

 

10,500,000

 

52,826,935

 

—

 

375,104

 

10,500,000

 

53,202,039

 

63,702,039

 

(4,436,975

)

59,265,064

 

—

 

Reserve at Eisenhower, The

 

Alexandria, VA

 

2002

 

226

 

6,500,000

 

34,585,060

 

—

 

118,993

 

6,500,000

 

34,704,053

 

41,204,053

 

(3,795,379

)

37,408,674

 

—

 

Reserve at Empire Lakes

 

Rancho Cucamonga, CA

 

2005

 

467

 

16,345,000

 

72,933,506

 

—

 

49,054

 

16,345,000

 

72,982,559

 

89,327,559

 

(1,804,790

)

87,522,769

 

—

 

Reserve at Marina Bay I

 

Quincy, MA

 

2002

 

136

 

3,618,844

 

24,005,980

 

—

 

115,219

 

3,618,844

 

24,121,199

 

27,740,043

 

(1,660,627

)

26,079,416

 

—

 

Reserve at Moreno Valley Ranch

 

Moreno Valley, CA

 

2005

 

176

 

8,800,000

 

26,100,502

 

—

 

(991)

 

8,800,000

 

26,099,511

 

34,899,511

 

(97,026

)

34,802,485

 

—

 

Reserve at Potomac Yard

 

Alexandria, VA

 

2002

 

588

 

11,918,917

 

68,976,484

 

—

 

512,810

 

11,918,917

 

69,489,295

 

81,408,211

 

(4,813,518

)

76,594,693

 

—

 

Reserve at Town Center (WA)

 

Mill Creek, WA

 

2001

 

389

 

10,369,400

 

41,172,081

 

—

 

280,233

 

10,369,400

 

41,452,314

 

51,821,714

 

(2,690,642

)

49,131,073

 

—

 

Residences at Little River

 

Haverhill, MA

 

2003

 

174

 

6,905,138

 

19,172,797

 

—

 

127,594

 

6,905,138

 

19,300,391

 

26,205,529

 

(1,616,781

)

24,588,748

 

—

 

Richmond Townhomes

 

Houston, TX

 

1995

 

188

 

940,000

 

13,906,905

 

—

 

1,759,573

 

940,000

 

15,666,478

 

16,606,478

 

(3,908,282

)

12,698,196

 

—

 

Ridgewood Village

 

San Diego, CA

 

1997

 

192

 

5,761,500

 

14,032,511

 

—

 

399,436

 

5,761,500

 

14,431,947

 

20,193,447

 

(4,061,138

)

16,132,308

 

—

 

Ridgewood Village II

 

San Diego, CA

 

1997

 

216

 

6,048,000

 

19,971,537

 

—

 

83,930

 

6,048,000

 

20,055,467

 

26,103,467

 

(3,635,720

)

22,467,746

 

—

 

Rincon

 

Houston, TX

 

1996

 

288

 

4,401,900

 

16,734,746

 

—

 

1,202,556

 

4,401,900

 

17,937,302

 

22,339,202

 

(5,777,113

)

16,562,089

 

—

 

River Hill

 

Grand Prairie, TX

 

1996

 

334

 

2,004,000

 

19,272,944

 

—

 

1,239,927

 

2,004,000

 

20,512,871

 

22,516,871

 

(5,470,138

)

17,046,733

 

—

 

River Park

 

Fort Worth, TX

 

1984

 

280

 

2,245,400

 

8,811,727

 

—

 

2,818,025

 

2,245,400

 

11,629,751

 

13,875,151

 

(3,829,186

)

10,045,965

 

—

 

River Stone Ranch

 

Austin, TX

 

1998

 

448

 

5,376,000

 

27,004,185

 

—

 

1,062,314

 

5,376,000

 

28,066,499

 

33,442,499

 

(2,628,751

)

30,813,748

 

—

 

Rivers Edge

 

Waterbury, CT

 

1974

 

156

 

781,900

 

6,561,167

 

—

 

648,464

 

781,900

 

7,209,631

 

7,991,531

 

(2,064,167

)

5,927,364

 

—

 

Riverside Park

 

Tulsa, OK

 

1994

 

288

 

1,441,400

 

12,371,637

 

—

 

962,077

 

1,441,400

 

13,333,714

 

14,775,114

 

(4,111,236

)

10,663,879

 

—

 

Rock Creek

 

Carrboro, NC

 

1986

 

188

 

895,700

 

8,062,543

 

—

 

1,738,461

 

895,700

 

9,801,003

 

10,696,703

 

(3,369,470

)

7,327,233

 

—

 

Rosecliff

 

Quincy, MA

 

1990

 

156

 

5,460,000

 

15,721,570

 

—

 

318,525

 

5,460,000

 

16,040,095

 

21,500,095

 

(3,584,549

)

17,915,545

 

—

 

Rosecliff II

 

Quincy, MA

 

(F)

 

—

 

—

 

1,379

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

1,379

 

1,379

 

—

 

1,379

 

—

 

Royal Oaks (FL)

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1991

 

284

 

1,988,000

 

13,645,117

 

—

 

1,726,746

 

1,988,000

 

15,371,863

 

17,359,863

 

(4,093,197

)

13,266,666

 

—

 

Sabal Palm at Boot Ranch

 

Palm Harbor, FL

 

1996

 

432

 

3,888,000

 

28,923,692

 

—

 

1,726,592

 

3,888,000

 

30,650,284

 

34,538,284

 

(8,138,491

)

26,399,793

 

—

 

Sabal Palm at Carrollwood Place

 

Tampa, FL

 

1995

 

432

 

3,888,000

 

26,911,542

 

—

 

1,172,386

 

3,888,000

 

28,083,928

 

31,971,928

 

(7,370,993

)

24,600,935

 

—

 

 

S-7



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

Sabal Palm at Lake Buena Vista

 

Orlando, FL

 

1988

 

400

 

2,800,000

 

23,687,893

 

—

 

1,573,061

 

2,800,000

 

25,260,954

 

28,060,954

 

(6,836,899

)

21,224,055

 

—

 

Sabal Palm at Metrowest

 

Orlando, FL

 

1998

 

411

 

4,110,000

 

38,394,865

 

—

 

1,903,018

 

4,110,000

 

40,297,883

 

44,407,883

 

(10,521,753

)

33,886,130

 

—

 

Sabal Palm at Metrowest II

 

Orlando, FL

 

1997

 

456

 

4,560,000

 

33,907,283

 

—

 

1,040,302

 

4,560,000

 

34,947,585

 

39,507,585

 

(9,041,902

)

30,465,682

 

—

 

Sabal Pointe

 

Coral Springs, FL

 

1995

 

275

 

1,951,600

 

17,570,508

 

—

 

2,222,344

 

1,951,600

 

19,792,851

 

21,744,451

 

(7,092,306

)

14,652,146

 

—

 

Saddle Ridge

 

Ashburn, VA

 

1989

 

216

 

1,364,800

 

12,283,616

 

—

 

1,386,652

 

1,364,800

 

13,670,269

 

15,035,069

 

(5,062,934

)

9,972,135

 

—

 

Sailboat Bay

 

Raleigh, NC

 

1986

 

192

 

960,000

 

8,797,580

 

—

 

975,376

 

960,000

 

9,772,956

 

10,732,956

 

(2,693,408

)

8,039,548

 

—

 

Savannah at Park Place

 

Atlanta, GA

 

2001

 

416

 

7,696,095

 

34,114,542

 

—

 

1,668,564

 

7,696,095

 

35,783,106

 

43,479,201

 

(2,565,888

)

40,913,313

 

—

 

Savannah Lakes

 

Boynton Beach, FL

 

1991

 

466

 

7,000,000

 

30,422,607

 

—

 

1,162,731

 

7,000,000

 

31,585,337

 

38,585,337

 

(4,681,965

)

33,903,372

 

—

 

Savannah Midtown

 

Atlanta, GA

 

2000

 

322

 

7,209,873

 

29,433,507

 

—

 

489,335

 

7,209,873

 

29,922,842

 

37,132,715

 

(2,234,028

)

34,898,687

 

—

 

Savoy I

 

Aurora, CO

 

2001

 

444

 

6,109,460

 

38,765,670

 

—

 

289,212

 

6,109,460

 

39,054,883

 

45,164,343

 

(3,061,041

)

42,103,302

 

—

 

Scottsdale Meadows

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1984

 

168

 

1,512,000

 

11,407,699

 

—

 

953,994

 

1,512,000

 

12,361,693

 

13,873,693

 

(3,706,200

)

10,167,493

 

—

 

Seeley Lake

 

Lakewood, WA

 

1990

 

522

 

2,760,400

 

24,845,286

 

—

 

2,406,953

 

2,760,400

 

27,252,240

 

30,012,640

 

(8,668,444

)

21,344,195

 

—

 

Seventh & James

 

Seattle, WA

 

1992

 

96

 

663,800

 

5,974,803

 

—

 

1,940,175

 

663,800

 

7,914,978

 

8,578,778

 

(2,856,209

)

5,722,569

 

—

 

Shadow Creek

 

Winter Springs, FL

 

2000

 

280

 

6,000,000

 

21,719,768

 

—

 

442,322

 

6,000,000

 

22,162,090

 

28,162,090

 

(1,589,587

)

26,572,503

 

—

 

Shadow Lake

 

Doraville, GA

 

1989

 

228

 

1,140,000

 

13,117,277

 

—

 

820,937

 

1,140,000

 

13,938,213

 

15,078,213

 

(3,713,996

)

11,364,218

 

—

 

Sheffield Court

 

Arlington, VA

 

1986

 

597

 

3,349,350

 

31,337,332

 

—

 

3,146,822

 

3,349,350

 

34,484,155

 

37,833,505

 

(13,708,489

)

24,125,016

 

—

 

Silver Springs (FL)

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1985

 

432

 

1,831,100

 

16,474,735

 

—

 

4,299,391

 

1,831,100

 

20,774,126

 

22,605,226

 

(7,293,340

)

15,311,885

 

—

 

Skylark

 

Union City, CA

 

1986

 

174

 

1,781,600

 

16,731,916

 

—

 

909,394

 

1,781,600

 

17,641,310

 

19,422,910

 

(4,756,904

)

14,666,006

 

—

 

Sommerset Place

 

Raleigh, NC

 

1983

 

144

 

360,000

 

7,800,206

 

—

 

956,872

 

360,000

 

8,757,078

 

9,117,078

 

(2,425,024

)

6,692,053

 

—

 

Sonata at Cherry Creek

 

Denver, CO

 

1999

 

183

 

5,490,000

 

18,130,479

 

—

 

579,871

 

5,490,000

 

18,710,350

 

24,200,350

 

(3,420,062

)

20,780,288

 

—

 

Sonoran

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

1995

 

429

 

2,361,922

 

31,841,724

 

—

 

1,506,749

 

2,361,922

 

33,348,473

 

35,710,395

 

(9,683,390

)

26,027,005

 

—

 

South Palm Place Condominium Homes

 

Tamarac, FL

 

1991

 

208

 

1,528,600

 

13,926,559

 

—

 

2,421,167

 

1,528,600

 

16,347,726

 

17,876,326

 

(4,202,168

)

13,674,158

 

—

 

Southwood

 

Palo Alto, CA

 

1985

 

99

 

6,936,600

 

14,324,069

 

—

 

1,318,138

 

6,936,600

 

15,642,207

 

22,578,807

 

(4,466,500

)

18,112,307

 

—

 

Spring Hill Commons

 

Acton, MA

 

1973

 

105

 

1,107,436

 

7,402,980

 

—

 

432,017

 

1,107,436

 

7,834,997

 

8,942,432

 

(1,548,990

)

7,393,442

 

—

 

St. Andrews at Winston Park

 

Coconut Creek, FL

 

1997

 

284

 

5,680,000

 

19,812,090

 

—

 

719,046

 

5,680,000

 

20,531,137

 

26,211,137

 

(3,118,568

)

23,092,569

 

—

 

Steeplechase

 

Charlotte, NC

 

1986

 

247

 

1,111,500

 

10,180,750

 

—

 

1,114,656

 

1,111,500

 

11,295,406

 

12,406,906

 

(3,161,005

)

9,245,900

 

—

 

Stone Oak

 

Houston, TX

 

1998

 

318

 

2,544,000

 

17,513,496

 

—

 

595,674

 

2,544,000

 

18,109,171

 

20,653,171

 

(2,503,907

)

18,149,263

 

—

 

Stonegate (CO)

 

Broomfield, CO

 

2003

 

350

 

8,750,000

 

32,998,268

 

—

 

517,086

 

8,750,000

 

33,515,354

 

42,265,354

 

(615,160

)

41,650,194

 

—

 

Stoneleigh at Deerfield

 

Alpharetta, GA

 

2003

 

370

 

4,810,000

 

29,999,596

 

—

 

82,900

 

4,810,000

 

30,082,496

 

34,892,496

 

(1,638,648

)

33,253,848

 

—

 

Stoney Creek

 

Lakewood, WA

 

1990

 

231

 

1,215,200

 

10,938,134

 

—

 

1,339,010

 

1,215,200

 

12,277,144

 

13,492,344

 

(3,926,062

)

9,566,282

 

—

 

Summer Creek

 

Plymouth, MN

 

1985

 

72

 

579,600

 

3,815,800

 

—

 

531,950

 

579,600

 

4,347,751

 

4,927,351

 

(1,345,065

)

3,582,285

 

—

 

Summer Ridge

 

Riverside, CA

 

1985

 

136

 

602,400

 

5,422,807

 

—

 

1,715,341

 

602,400

 

7,138,148

 

7,740,548

 

(2,390,434

)

5,350,115

 

—

 

Summerset Village II

 

Chatsworth, CA

 

(F)

 

—

 

260,646

 

31,577

 

—

 

—

 

260,646

 

31,577

 

292,223

 

—

 

292,223

 

—

 

Summerwood

 

Hayward, CA

 

1982

 

162

 

4,866,600

 

6,942,743

 

—

 

976,409

 

4,866,600

 

7,919,152

 

12,785,752

 

(2,353,872

)

10,431,880

 

—

 

Summit at Lake Union

 

Seattle, WA

 

1995 - 1997

 

150

 

1,424,700

 

12,852,461

 

—

 

1,355,102

 

1,424,700

 

14,207,563

 

15,632,263

 

(4,554,045

)

11,078,218

 

—

 

Sunforest

 

Davie, FL

 

1989

 

494

 

10,000,000

 

32,124,850

 

—

 

1,238,500

 

10,000,000

 

33,363,350

 

43,363,350

 

(3,138,993

)

40,224,356

 

—

 

Surrey Downs

 

Bellevue, WA

 

1986

 

122

 

3,057,100

 

7,848,618

 

—

 

724,540

 

3,057,100

 

8,573,158

 

11,630,258

 

(2,449,394

)

9,180,864

 

—

 

Sycamore Creek

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1984

 

350

 

3,152,000

 

19,083,727

 

—

 

1,925,867

 

3,152,000

 

21,009,594

 

24,161,594

 

(6,513,264

)

17,648,330

 

—

 

Tamarlane

 

Portland, ME

 

1986

 

115

 

690,900

 

5,153,633

 

—

 

554,772

 

690,900

 

5,708,404

 

6,399,304

 

(1,843,622

)

4,555,682

 

—

 

Timber Hollow

 

Chapel Hill, NC

 

1986

 

198

 

800,000

 

11,219,537

 

—

 

1,254,060

 

800,000

 

12,473,597

 

13,273,597

 

(3,390,745

)

9,882,852

 

—

 

Timber Ridge, LLC

 

Woodinville, WA

 

1986

 

175

 

946,603

 

8,810,810

 

—

 

2,163,063

 

946,603

 

10,973,873

 

11,920,476

 

(3,804,469

)

8,116,007

 

—

 

Timberwalk

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1987

 

284

 

1,988,000

 

13,204,219

 

—

 

1,289,788

 

1,988,000

 

14,494,007

 

16,482,007

 

(4,040,983

)

12,441,024

 

—

 

Tortuga Bay

 

Orlando, FL

 

2004

 

314

 

6,280,000

 

32,121,779

 

—

 

165,613

 

6,280,000

 

32,287,393

 

38,567,393

 

(1,457,914

)

37,109,479

 

—

 

Toscana

 

Irvine, CA

 

1991/1993

 

563

 

39,410,000

 

50,806,072

 

—

 

2,790,619

 

39,410,000

 

53,596,692

 

93,006,692

 

(10,294,214

)

82,712,478

 

—

 

Town Center (TX)

 

Kingwood, TX

 

1994

 

258

 

1,291,300

 

11,530,216

 

—

 

1,678,091

 

1,291,300

 

13,208,307

 

14,499,607

 

(4,232,717

)

10,266,889

 

—

 

Town Center II (TX)

 

Kingwood, TX

 

1994

 

260

 

1,375,000

 

14,169,656

 

—

 

92,683

 

1,375,000

 

14,262,339

 

15,637,339

 

(3,136,907

)

12,500,431

 

—

 

Trails at Briar Forest

 

Houston, TX

 

1990

 

476

 

2,380,000

 

24,911,561

 

—

 

2,691,171

 

2,380,000

 

27,602,732

 

29,982,732

 

(7,294,768

)

22,687,964

 

—

 

Trails at Dominion Park

 

Houston, TX

 

1992

 

843

 

2,531,800

 

35,699,589

 

—

 

4,607,280

 

2,531,800

 

40,306,869

 

42,838,669

 

(13,564,168

)

29,274,501

 

—

 

Trump Place, 140 Riverside

 

New York, NY (G)

 

2003

 

354

 

103,539,100

 

94,067,579

 

—

 

22,501

 

103,539,100

 

94,090,080

 

197,629,180

 

(715,681

)

196,913,499

 

—

 

Trump Place, 160 Riverside

 

New York, NY (G)

 

2001

 

455

 

139,933,500

 

190,942,704

 

—

 

25,250

 

139,933,500

 

190,967,954

 

330,901,454

 

(1,350,772

)

329,550,681

 

—

 

Trump Place, 180 Riverside

 

New York, NY (G)

 

1998

 

516

 

144,968,250

 

138,324,604

 

—

 

23,133

 

144,968,250

 

138,347,737

 

283,315,987

 

(1,029,662

)

282,286,325

 

—

 

Turnberry Isle

 

Dallas, TX

 

1994

 

187

 

2,992,000

 

15,287,584

 

—

 

314,119

 

2,992,000

 

15,601,703

 

18,593,703

 

(907,851

)

17,685,852

 

—

 

Tuscany Villas, LLC

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

1995

 

2

 

14,104

 

147,357

 

—

 

(110,198)

 

14,104

 

37,159

 

51,263

 

(38,016

)

13,247

 

—

 

Tyrone Gardens

 

Randolph, MA

 

1961/1965

 

165

 

4,953,000

 

5,799,572

 

—

 

1,109,921

 

4,953,000

 

6,909,493

 

11,862,493

 

(2,114,455

)

9,748,039

 

—

 

Valencia Plantation

 

Orlando, FL

 

1990

 

194

 

873,000

 

12,819,377

 

—

 

677,489

 

873,000

 

13,496,866

 

14,369,866

 

(3,480,119

)

10,889,747

 

—

 

Venetian Condominium Phase II, LLC

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

1983

 

1

 

5,985

 

54,012

 

—

 

(109,358)

 

5,985

 

(55,346)

 

(49,361)

 

(17,105

)

(66,466)

 

—

 

Versailles

 

Woodland Hills, CA

 

1991

 

253

 

12,650,000

 

33,656,292

 

—

 

1,924,182

 

12,650,000

 

35,580,475

 

48,230,475

 

(3,049,419

)

45,181,056

 

—

 

Via Ventura

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1980

 

328

 

1,486,600

 

13,382,006

 

—

 

6,828,432

 

1,486,600

 

20,210,438

 

21,697,038

 

(10,512,879

)

11,184,159

 

—

 

View Pointe

 

Riverside, CA

 

1998

 

208

 

10,400,000

 

26,310,471

 

—

 

8,895

 

10,400,000

 

26,319,366

 

36,719,366

 

(316,576

)

36,402,790

 

—

 

Villa Solana

 

Laguna Hills, CA

 

1984

 

272

 

1,665,100

 

14,985,678

 

—

 

3,549,107

 

1,665,100

 

18,534,784

 

20,199,884

 

(8,135,601

)

12,064,283

 

—

 

Village at Lakewood

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

1988

 

240

 

3,166,411

 

13,859,090

 

—

 

1,323,556

 

3,166,411

 

15,182,646

 

18,349,057

 

(4,725,433

)

13,623,624

 

—

 

Village Oaks

 

Austin, TX

 

1984

 

280

 

1,186,000

 

10,663,736

 

—

 

1,798,816

 

1,186,000

 

12,462,552

 

13,648,552

 

(4,407,603

)

9,240,949

 

—

 

Village of Newport

 

Kent, WA

 

1987

 

100

 

416,300

 

3,756,582

 

—

 

569,163

 

416,300

 

4,325,745

 

4,742,045

 

(1,890,240

)

2,851,805

 

—

 

Virgil Square

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

1979

 

142

 

5,500,000

 

15,215,115

 

—

 

84,745

 

5,500,000

 

15,299,860

 

20,799,860

 

(486,422

)

20,313,438

 

—

 

Vista Del Lago

 

Mission Viejo, CA

 

1986-88

 

608

 

4,525,800

 

40,736,293

 

—

 

6,810,377

 

4,525,800

 

47,546,670

 

52,072,470

 

(19,918,888

)

32,153,582

 

—

 

Vista Del Lago (TX)

 

Dallas, TX

 

1992

 

296

 

3,552,000

 

20,066,912

 

—

 

1,023,347

 

3,552,000

 

21,090,259

 

24,642,259

 

(3,744,403

)

20,897,856

 

—

 

Vista Grove

 

Mesa, AZ

 

1997 - 1998

 

224

 

1,341,796

 

12,157,045

 

—

 

824,904

 

1,341,796

 

12,981,949

 

14,323,745

 

(3,653,618

)

10,670,127

 

—

 

Waterford (Jax) II

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

(F)

 

—

 

566,923

 

62,373

 

—

 

—

 

566,923

 

62,373

 

629,296

 

—

 

629,296

 

—

 

Waterford at Deerwood

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1985

 

248

 

1,696,000

 

10,659,702

 

—

 

1,892,879

 

1,696,000

 

12,552,581

 

14,248,581

 

(3,622,373

)

10,626,208

 

—

 

Waterside

 

Reston, VA

 

1984

 

276

 

20,700,000

 

27,441,707

 

—

 

—

 

20,700,000

 

27,441,707

 

48,141,707

 

—

 

48,141,707

 

—

 

Webster Green

 

Needham, MA

 

1985

 

77

 

1,418,893

 

9,485,006

 

—

 

342,912

 

1,418,893

 

9,827,918

 

11,246,810

 

(1,845,852

)

9,400,958

 

—

 

 

S-8



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

Welleby Lake Club

 

Sunrise, FL

 

1991

 

304

 

3,648,000

 

17,620,879

 

—

 

1,333,295

 

3,648,000

 

18,954,174

 

22,602,174

 

(5,118,675

)

17,483,499

 

—

 

Wellsford Oaks

 

Tulsa, OK

 

1991

 

300

 

1,310,500

 

11,794,290

 

—

 

1,180,672

 

1,310,500

 

12,974,962

 

14,285,462

 

(4,237,545

)

10,047,917

 

—

 

Westfield Village

 

Centerville, VA

 

1988

 

228

 

7,000,000

 

23,245,834

 

—

 

2,974,751

 

7,000,000

 

26,220,585

 

33,220,585

 

(1,593,131

)

31,627,454

 

—

 

Westridge

 

Tacoma, WA

 

1987/1991

 

714

 

3,501,900

 

31,506,082

 

—

 

3,555,070

 

3,501,900

 

35,061,152

 

38,563,052

 

(11,501,688

)

27,061,365

 

—

 

Westside Villas I

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

1999

 

21

 

1,785,000

 

3,233,254

 

—

 

172,379

 

1,785,000

 

3,405,633

 

5,190,633

 

(680,637

)

4,509,996

 

—

 

Westside Villas II

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

1999

 

23

 

1,955,000

 

3,541,435

 

—

 

36,647

 

1,955,000

 

3,578,082

 

5,533,082

 

(657,765

)

4,875,317

 

—

 

Westside Villas III

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

1999

 

36

 

3,060,000

 

5,538,871

 

—

 

77,719

 

3,060,000

 

5,616,590

 

8,676,590

 

(1,037,875

)

7,638,716

 

—

 

Westside Villas IV

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

1999

 

36

 

3,060,000

 

5,539,390

 

—

 

48,706

 

3,060,000

 

5,588,096

 

8,648,096

 

(1,026,645

)

7,621,451

 

—

 

Westside Villas V

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

1999

 

60

 

5,100,000

 

9,224,485

 

—

 

83,010

 

5,100,000

 

9,307,495

 

14,407,495

 

(1,714,099

)

12,693,396

 

—

 

Westside Villas VI

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

1989

 

18

 

1,530,000

 

3,024,001

 

—

 

139,324

 

1,530,000

 

3,163,326

 

4,693,326

 

(575,107

)

4,118,218

 

—

 

Westside Villas VII

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

2001

 

53

 

4,505,000

 

10,758,900

 

—

 

73,058

 

4,505,000

 

10,831,957

 

15,336,957

 

(1,383,031

)

13,953,926

 

—

 

Whisper Creek

 

Denver, CO

 

2002

 

272

 

5,310,000

 

22,998,558

 

—

 

276,324

 

5,310,000

 

23,274,883

 

28,584,883

 

(1,319,575

)

27,265,307

 

—

 

Whispering Oaks

 

Walnut Creek, CA

 

1974

 

316

 

2,170,800

 

19,539,586

 

—

 

2,904,542

 

2,170,800

 

22,444,128

 

24,614,928

 

(7,912,651

)

16,702,277

 

—

 

Willow Trail

 

Norcross, GA

 

1985

 

224

 

1,120,000

 

11,412,982

 

—

 

953,680

 

1,120,000

 

12,366,661

 

13,486,661

 

(3,361,504

)

10,125,157

 

—

 

Wimberly

 

Dallas, TX

 

1996

 

372

 

2,232,000

 

27,685,923

 

—

 

1,204,113

 

2,232,000

 

28,890,036

 

31,122,036

 

(7,535,518

)

23,586,519

 

—

 

Wimberly at Deerwood

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

2000

 

322

 

8,000,000

 

30,057,214

 

—

 

10,156

 

8,000,000

 

30,067,371

 

38,067,371

 

(423,429

)

37,643,942

 

—

 

Winchester Park

 

Riverside, RI

 

1972

 

416

 

2,822,618

 

18,868,626

 

—

 

2,550,491

 

2,822,618

 

21,419,117

 

24,241,735

 

(4,819,975

)

19,421,761

 

—

 

Winchester Wood

 

Riverside, RI

 

1989

 

62

 

683,215

 

4,567,154

 

—

 

203,613

 

683,215

 

4,770,767

 

5,453,982

 

(905,376

)

4,548,606

 

—

 

Windemere

 

Mesa, AZ

 

1986

 

224

 

940,450

 

8,659,280

 

—

 

1,815,944

 

940,450

 

10,475,224

 

11,415,674

 

(3,718,490

)

7,697,184

 

—

 

Windmont

 

Atlanta, GA

 

1988

 

178

 

3,204,000

 

7,128,448

 

—

 

624,839

 

3,204,000

 

7,753,287

 

10,957,287

 

(1,813,856

)

9,143,431

 

—

 

Windsor at Fair Lakes

 

Fairfax, VA

 

1988

 

250

 

10,000,000

 

28,587,109

 

—

 

2,190,484

 

10,000,000

 

30,777,592

 

40,777,592

 

(1,860,377

)

38,917,215

 

—

 

Winterwood

 

Charlotte, NC

 

1986

 

384

 

1,722,000

 

15,501,142

 

—

 

3,510,154

 

1,722,000

 

19,011,296

 

20,733,296

 

(8,628,614

)

12,104,682

 

—

 

Wood Creek (CA)

 

Pleasant Hill, CA

 

1987

 

256

 

9,729,900

 

23,009,768

 

—

 

1,567,003

 

9,729,900

 

24,576,772

 

34,306,672

 

(7,587,384

)

26,719,288

 

—

 

Woodbridge II

 

Cary, NC

 

1993-95

 

216

 

1,244,600

 

11,243,364

 

—

 

1,245,278

 

1,244,600

 

12,488,642

 

13,733,242

 

(4,317,351

)

9,415,890

 

—

 

Woodcreek

 

Beaverton, OR

 

1982-84

 

440

 

1,755,800

 

15,816,455

 

—

 

3,629,754

 

1,755,800

 

19,446,208

 

21,202,008

 

(8,664,858

)

12,537,150

 

—

 

Woodland Hills

 

Decatur, GA

 

1985

 

228

 

1,224,600

 

11,010,681

 

—

 

2,072,016

 

1,224,600

 

13,082,697

 

14,307,297

 

(4,919,977

)

9,387,320

 

—

 

Woodland Meadows

 

Ann Arbor, MI

 

1987-1989

 

306

 

2,006,000

 

18,049,552

 

—

 

1,827,376

 

2,006,000

 

19,876,927

 

21,882,927

 

(6,243,516

)

15,639,411

 

—

 

Woodlands of Minnetonka

 

Minnetonka, MN

 

1988

 

248

 

2,394,500

 

13,543,076

 

—

 

2,006,632

 

2,394,500

 

15,549,708

 

17,944,208

 

(4,802,537

)

13,141,672

 

—

 

Woodmoor

 

Austin, TX

 

1981

 

208

 

653,800

 

5,875,968

 

—

 

2,295,658

 

653,800

 

8,171,626

 

8,825,426

 

(3,931,399

)

4,894,027

 

—

 

Woods of Elm Creek

 

San Antonio, TX

 

1983

 

185

 

590,000

 

5,310,328

 

—

 

1,069,562

 

590,000

 

6,379,890

 

6,969,890

 

(2,289,226

)

4,680,664

 

—

 

Woodside

 

Lorton, VA

 

1987

 

252

 

1,326,000

 

12,510,903

 

—

 

4,155,777

 

1,326,000

 

16,666,680

 

17,992,680

 

(5,850,483

)

12,142,196

 

—

 

Yarmouth Woods

 

Yarmouth, ME

 

1971/1978

 

138

 

692,800

 

6,096,155

 

—

 

1,130,470

 

692,800

 

7,226,625

 

7,919,425

 

(2,143,003

)

5,776,422

 

—

 

Management Business

 

Chicago, IL

 

(D)

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

60,973,560

 

—

 

60,973,560

 

60,973,560

 

(27,492,407

)

33,481,154

 

—

 

Operating Partnership

 

Chicago, IL

 

(F)

 

—

 

—

 

1,160,738

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

1,160,738

 

1,160,738

 

—

 

1,160,738

 

—

 

EQR Wholly Owned Unencumbered

 

 

 

 

 

100,176

 

1,909,581,388

 

7,611,615,024

 

—

 

660,361,487

 

1,909,581,388

 

8,271,976,512

 

10,181,557,900

 

(1,791,910,458

)

8,389,647,442

 

—

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EQR Wholly Owned Encumbered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1660 Peachtree

 

Atlanta, GA

 

1999

 

355

 

7,987,511

 

23,602,563

 

—

 

1,664,937

 

7,987,511

 

25,267,500

 

33,255,011

 

(1,897,646

)

31,357,365

 

23,000,000

 

740 River Drive

 

St. Paul, MN

 

1962

 

163

 

1,626,700

 

11,234,943

 

—

 

3,174,983

 

1,626,700

 

14,409,925

 

16,036,625

 

(4,975,463

)

11,061,163

 

5,359,761

 

929 House

 

Cambridge, MA (G)

 

1975

 

127

 

3,252,993

 

21,745,595

 

—

 

1,411,981

 

3,252,993

 

23,157,576

 

26,410,569

 

(4,310,702

)

22,099,868

 

4,241,057

 

Amberton

 

Manassas, VA

 

1986

 

190

 

900,600

 

11,921,815

 

—

 

1,787,076

 

900,600

 

13,708,891

 

14,609,491

 

(4,371,353

)

10,238,138

 

10,705,000

 

Arbor Glen

 

Ypsilanti, MI

 

1990

 

220

 

1,096,064

 

9,887,635

 

—

 

1,757,256

 

1,096,064

 

11,644,891

 

12,740,955

 

(3,714,977

)

9,025,978

 

6,222,204

 

Arbor Terrace

 

Sunnyvale, CA

 

1979

 

174

 

9,057,300

 

18,483,642

 

—

 

803,803

 

9,057,300

 

19,287,445

 

28,344,745

 

(5,256,549

)

23,088,196

 

(O

)

Arboretum (MA)

 

Canton, MA

 

1989

 

156

 

4,685,900

 

10,992,751

 

—

 

929,579

 

4,685,900

 

11,922,330

 

16,608,230

 

(3,395,512

)

13,212,718

 

(K

)

Arbors of Hickory Hollow

 

Antioch, TN

 

1986

 

336

 

202,985

 

6,937,209

 

—

 

3,353,261

 

202,985

 

10,290,470

 

10,493,455

 

(5,356,766

)

5,136,688

 

(J

)

Arden Villas

 

Orlando, FL

 

1999

 

336

 

5,500,000

 

28,600,796

 

—

 

529,776

 

5,500,000

 

29,130,572

 

34,630,572

 

(566,444

)

34,064,128

 

23,366,390

 

Artisan Square

 

Northridge, CA

 

2002

 

140

 

7,000,000

 

20,537,359

 

—

 

202,266

 

7,000,000

 

20,739,625

 

27,739,625

 

(2,334,224

)

25,405,401

 

(Q

)

Autumn River

 

Raleigh, NC

 

2002

 

284

 

3,408,000

 

20,890,457

 

—

 

366,215

 

3,408,000

 

21,256,672

 

24,664,672

 

(1,749,121

)

22,915,552

 

(Q

)

Avon Place

 

Avon, CT

 

1973

 

163

 

1,788,943

 

12,440,003

 

—

 

726,628

 

1,788,943

 

13,166,631

 

14,955,574

 

(2,456,333

)

12,499,242

 

(M

)

Bay Hill

 

Long Beach, CA

 

2002

 

160

 

7,600,000

 

27,437,239

 

—

 

125,253

 

7,600,000

 

27,562,493

 

35,162,493

 

(1,898,052

)

33,264,441

 

13,997,000

 

Bradford Apartments

 

Newington, CT

 

1964

 

64

 

401,091

 

2,681,210

 

—

 

263,696

 

401,091

 

2,944,906

 

3,345,997

 

(602,608

)

2,743,390

 

(M

)

Briar Knoll Apts

 

Vernon, CT

 

1986

 

150

 

928,972

 

6,209,988

 

—

 

581,190

 

928,972

 

6,791,177

 

7,720,149

 

(1,398,130

)

6,322,019

 

5,676,414

 

Briarwood (CA)

 

Sunnyvale, CA

 

1985

 

192

 

9,991,500

 

22,247,278

 

—

 

728,062

 

9,991,500

 

22,975,340

 

32,966,840

 

(5,981,201

)

26,985,639

 

13,050,887

 

Broadway

 

Garland, TX

 

1983

 

288

 

1,443,700

 

7,790,989

 

—

 

2,006,938

 

1,443,700

 

9,797,928

 

11,241,628

 

(3,220,728

)

8,020,900

 

5,616,899

 

Brookdale Village

 

Naperville, IL

 

1986

 

252

 

3,276,000

 

16,293,471

 

—

 

1,727,982

 

3,276,000

 

18,021,453

 

21,297,453

 

(4,502,095

)

16,795,357

 

10,820,000

 

Brookside (MD)

 

Frederick, MD

 

1993

 

228

 

2,736,000

 

7,934,517

 

—

 

1,205,761

 

2,736,000

 

9,140,278

 

11,876,278

 

(2,517,088

)

9,359,190

 

8,170,000

 

Brooksyde Apts

 

West Hartford, CT

 

1945

 

80

 

594,711

 

3,975,523

 

—

 

337,860

 

594,711

 

4,313,383

 

4,908,094

 

(894,314

)

4,013,780

 

(M

)

Burgundy Studios

 

Middletown, CT

 

1973

 

102

 

395,238

 

2,642,087

 

—

 

275,439

 

395,238

 

2,917,525

 

3,312,763

 

(638,642

)

2,674,121

 

(M

)

Canterbury

 

Germantown, MD

 

1986

 

544

 

2,781,300

 

32,942,531

 

—

 

4,175,442

 

2,781,300

 

37,117,973

 

39,899,273

 

(12,974,107

)

26,925,166

 

31,680,000

 

Carlyle

 

Dallas, TX

 

1993

 

180

 

1,890,000

 

14,155,000

 

—

 

616,231

 

1,890,000

 

14,771,231

 

16,661,231

 

(1,447,424

)

15,213,807

 

8,130,340

 

Cedar Glen

 

Reading, MA

 

1980

 

114

 

1,248,505

 

8,346,003

 

—

 

590,727

 

1,248,505

 

8,936,731

 

10,185,236

 

(1,706,490

)

8,478,746

 

2,352,508

 

Centennial Court

 

Seattle, WA (G)

 

2001

 

187

 

3,800,000

 

21,280,039

 

—

 

20,109

 

3,800,000

 

21,300,148

 

25,100,148

 

(962,406

)

24,137,741

 

18,159,410

 

Centennial Tower

 

Seattle, WA (G)

 

1991

 

221

 

5,900,000

 

48,800,339

 

—

 

466,756

 

5,900,000

 

49,267,095

 

55,167,095

 

(2,046,070

)

53,121,026

 

28,474,324

 

Cherry Creek I,II,&III (TN)

 

Hermitage, TN

 

1986/96

 

627

 

2,942,345

 

45,725,245

 

—

 

1,648,648

 

2,942,345

 

47,373,893

 

50,316,238

 

(11,556,061

)

38,760,178

 

17,191,462

 

Chestnut Glen

 

Abington, MA

 

1983

 

130

 

1,178,965

 

7,881,139

 

—

 

433,615

 

1,178,965

 

8,314,754

 

9,493,719

 

(1,645,105

)

7,848,614

 

4,170,509

 

Chickasaw Crossing

 

Orlando, FL

 

1986

 

292

 

2,044,000

 

12,366,832

 

—

 

1,052,254

 

2,044,000

 

13,419,086

 

15,463,086

 

(3,679,004

)

11,784,082

 

11,657,142

 

Church Corner

 

Cambridge, MA (G)

 

1987

 

85

 

5,220,000

 

16,744,643

 

—

 

83,928

 

5,220,000

 

16,828,572

 

22,048,572

 

(938,608

)

21,109,964

 

12,000,000

 

Cierra Crest

 

Denver, CO

 

1996

 

480

 

4,803,100

 

34,894,898

 

—

 

1,994,179

 

4,803,100

 

36,889,077

 

41,692,177

 

(10,612,615

)

31,079,561

 

(O

)

Club at Tanasbourne

 

Hillsboro, OR

 

1990

 

352

 

3,521,300

 

16,257,934

 

—

 

2,136,042

 

3,521,300

 

18,393,977

 

21,915,277

 

(6,167,862

)

15,747,415

 

(N

)

Coachlight Village

 

Agawam, MA

 

1967

 

88

 

501,726

 

3,353,933

 

—

 

263,874

 

501,726

 

3,617,807

 

4,119,533

 

(726,398

)

3,393,135

 

(M

)

Coachman Trails

 

Plymouth, MN

 

1987

 

154

 

1,227,000

 

9,517,381

 

—

 

972,232

 

1,227,000

 

10,489,613

 

11,716,613

 

(3,040,311

)

8,676,302

 

5,992,226

 

 

S-9



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

Colonial Village

 

Plainville, CT

 

1968

 

104

 

693,575

 

4,636,410

 

—

 

531,777

 

693,575

 

5,168,187

 

5,861,762

 

(1,065,983

)

4,795,779

 

(M)

 

Conway Court

 

Roslindale, MA

 

1920

 

28

 

101,451

 

710,524

 

—

 

72,700

 

101,451

 

783,223

 

884,675

 

(171,317

)

713,358

 

395,499

 

Country Club Lakes

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1997

 

555

 

15,000,000

 

41,055,786

 

—

 

110,875

 

15,000,000

 

41,166,660

 

56,166,660

 

(1,260,214

)

54,906,446

 

34,088,308

 

Coventry at Cityview

 

Fort Worth, TX

 

1996

 

360

 

2,160,000

 

23,072,847

 

—

 

1,481,484

 

2,160,000

 

24,554,331

 

26,714,331

 

(6,450,741

)

20,263,590

 

(Q)

 

Creekside (San Mateo)

 

San Mateo, CA

 

1985

 

192

 

9,606,600

 

21,193,232

 

—

 

963,870

 

9,606,600

 

22,157,101

 

31,763,701

 

(5,879,604

)

25,884,097

 

(O)

 

Cross Creek

 

Matthews, NC

 

1989

 

420

 

3,151,600

 

20,295,925

 

—

 

1,752,536

 

3,151,600

 

22,048,461

 

25,200,061

 

(6,200,338

)

18,999,723

 

(O)

 

Crown Court

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1987

 

416

 

3,156,600

 

28,414,599

 

—

 

3,264,674

 

3,156,600

 

31,679,273

 

34,835,873

 

(10,200,015

)

24,635,858

 

(P)

 

Dean Estates II

 

Cranston, RI

 

1970

 

48

 

308,457

 

2,061,971

 

—

 

260,754

 

308,457

 

2,322,725

 

2,631,182

 

(499,687

)

2,131,495

 

(M)

 

Deerwood (Corona)

 

Corona, CA

 

1992

 

316

 

4,742,200

 

20,272,892

 

—

 

2,184,235

 

4,742,200

 

22,457,127

 

27,199,327

 

(6,937,732

)

20,261,596

 

(Q)

 

Eastbridge

 

Dallas, TX

 

1998

 

169

 

3,380,000

 

11,860,382

 

—

 

468,597

 

3,380,000

 

12,328,979

 

15,708,979

 

(2,177,928

)

13,531,051

 

8,293,041

 

Fernbrook Townhomes

 

Plymouth, MN

 

1993

 

72

 

580,100

 

6,683,693

 

—

 

405,388

 

580,100

 

7,089,080

 

7,669,180

 

(1,921,685

)

5,747,496

 

4,914,989

 

Fireside Park

 

Rockville, MD

 

1961

 

236

 

4,248,000

 

9,977,101

 

—

 

1,736,749

 

4,248,000

 

11,713,850

 

15,961,850

 

(3,188,753

)

12,773,096

 

8,095,000

 

Forest Ridge I & II

 

Arlington, TX

 

1984/85

 

660

 

2,362,700

 

21,263,295

 

—

 

4,695,730

 

2,362,700

 

25,959,025

 

28,321,725

 

(9,649,267

)

18,672,458

 

(P)

 

Fountain Place I

 

Eden Prairie, MN

 

1989

 

332

 

2,405,068

 

21,694,117

 

—

 

1,971,411

 

2,405,068

 

23,665,528

 

26,070,597

 

(7,110,317

)

18,960,280

 

24,653,106

 

Fountain Place II

 

Eden Prairie, MN

 

1989

 

158

 

1,231,350

 

11,095,333

 

—

 

816,283

 

1,231,350

 

11,911,616

 

13,142,965

 

(3,501,733

)

9,641,233

 

12,600,000

 

Fountainhead I

 

San Antonio, TX

 

1985/1987

 

240

 

1,205,816

 

5,200,241

 

—

 

957,341

 

1,205,816

 

6,157,582

 

7,363,398

 

(4,126,821

)

3,236,577

 

(K)

 

Fountainhead II

 

San Antonio, TX

 

1985/1987

 

224

 

1,205,817

 

4,529,801

 

—

 

1,551,825

 

1,205,817

 

6,081,626

 

7,287,443

 

(3,892,958

)

3,394,485

 

(K)

 

Fountainhead III

 

San Antonio, TX

 

1985/1987

 

224

 

1,205,816

 

4,399,093

 

—

 

1,552,469

 

1,205,816

 

5,951,561

 

7,157,377

 

(3,601,258

)

3,556,119

 

(K)

 

Four Lakes 5

 

Lisle, IL (G)

 

1968/1988

 

478

 

600,000

 

19,186,686

 

—

 

2,948,913

 

600,000

 

22,135,599

 

22,735,599

 

(12,998,075

)

9,737,524

 

(K)

 

Four Winds

 

Fall River, MA

 

1987

 

168

 

1,370,843

 

9,163,804

 

—

 

569,307

 

1,370,843

 

9,733,112

 

11,103,955

 

(1,936,688

)

9,167,266

 

(M)

 

Fox Hill Apartments

 

Enfield, CT

 

1974

 

168

 

1,129,018

 

7,547,256

 

—

 

453,814

 

1,129,018

 

8,001,070

 

9,130,089

 

(1,626,557

)

7,503,531

 

(M)

 

Gates at Carlson Center

 

Minnetonka, MN

 

1989

 

435

 

4,355,200

 

23,802,817

 

—

 

5,999,422

 

4,355,200

 

29,802,239

 

34,157,439

 

(8,810,523

)

25,346,916

 

(L)

 

Geary Court Yard

 

San Francisco, CA

 

1990

 

164

 

1,722,400

 

15,471,429

 

—

 

962,370

 

1,722,400

 

16,433,799

 

18,156,199

 

(4,819,829

)

13,336,370

 

17,693,865

 

Glen Grove

 

Wellesley, MA

 

1979

 

125

 

1,344,601

 

8,988,383

 

—

 

557,877

 

1,344,601

 

9,546,260

 

10,890,861

 

(1,834,976

)

9,055,885

 

3,068,436

 

Glen Meadow

 

Franklin, MA

 

1971

 

288

 

2,339,330

 

17,796,431

 

—

 

1,680,370

 

2,339,330

 

19,476,802

 

21,816,132

 

(3,711,977

)

18,104,155

 

1,747,990

 

GlenGarry Club

 

Bloomingdale, IL

 

1989

 

250

 

3,129,700

 

15,807,889

 

—

 

2,037,177

 

3,129,700

 

17,845,066

 

20,974,766

 

(5,386,521

)

15,588,245

 

(L)

 

Glenlake

 

Glendale Heights. IL

 

1988

 

336

 

5,041,700

 

16,671,970

 

—

 

4,451,531

 

5,041,700

 

21,123,500

 

26,165,200

 

(6,934,928

)

19,230,273

 

14,845,000

 

Gosnold Grove

 

East Falmouth, MA

 

1978

 

33

 

124,296

 

830,891

 

—

 

123,419

 

124,296

 

954,310

 

1,078,605

 

(234,503

)

844,102

 

563,591

 

Greenhaven

 

Union City, CA

 

1983

 

250

 

7,507,000

 

15,210,399

 

—

 

1,539,590

 

7,507,000

 

16,749,989

 

24,256,989

 

(4,721,262

)

19,535,726

 

10,975,000

 

Greenhouse - Frey Road

 

Kennesaw, GA

 

1985

 

489

 

2,467,200

 

22,187,443

 

—

 

3,363,602

 

2,467,200

 

25,551,045

 

28,018,245

 

(10,918,272

)

17,099,973

 

(K)

 

Greenhouse - Holcomb Bridge

 

Alpharetta, GA

 

1985

 

437

 

2,143,300

 

19,291,427

 

—

 

3,276,562

 

2,143,300

 

22,567,990

 

24,711,290

 

(9,809,979

)

14,901,311

 

(K)

 

Greenhouse - Roswell

 

Roswell, GA

 

1985

 

236

 

1,220,000

 

10,974,727

 

—

 

2,018,650

 

1,220,000

 

12,993,377

 

14,213,377

 

(5,739,990

)

8,473,387

 

(K)

 

Greentree 1

 

Glen Burnie, MD

 

1973

 

350

 

3,912,968

 

11,784,021

 

—

 

2,779,050

 

3,912,968

 

14,563,070

 

18,476,038

 

(4,087,065

)

14,388,973

 

11,000,000

 

Hampshire Place

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

1989

 

259

 

10,806,000

 

30,335,330

 

—

 

393,500

 

10,806,000

 

30,728,830

 

41,534,830

 

(1,706,627

)

39,828,203

 

19,335,708

 

Harbor Steps

 

Seattle, WA (G)

 

2000

 

730

 

59,900,000

 

158,688,748

 

—

 

86,711

 

59,900,000

 

158,775,459

 

218,675,459

 

(2,008,509

)

216,666,950

 

146,644,836

 

Heritage Green

 

Sturbridge, MA

 

1974

 

130

 

835,313

 

5,583,898

 

—

 

690,542

 

835,313

 

6,274,440

 

7,109,753

 

(1,277,818

)

5,831,935

 

2,219,486

 

High Meadow

 

Ellington, CT

 

1975

 

100

 

583,679

 

3,901,774

 

—

 

266,656

 

583,679

 

4,168,430

 

4,752,109

 

(847,889

)

3,904,220

 

4,057,240

 

Highland Point

 

Aurora, CO

 

1984

 

319

 

1,631,900

 

14,684,439

 

—

 

1,776,395

 

1,631,900

 

16,460,834

 

18,092,734

 

(5,348,448

)

12,744,286

 

(N)

 

Highlands at Cherry Hill

 

Cherry Hills, NJ

 

2002

 

170

 

6,800,000

 

21,459,108

 

—

 

27,850

 

6,800,000

 

21,486,958

 

28,286,958

 

(676,263

)

27,610,695

 

17,450,986

 

Highlands at South Plainfield

 

South Plainfield, NJ

 

2000

 

252

 

10,080,000

 

37,526,912

 

—

 

10,707

 

10,080,000

 

37,537,619

 

47,617,619

 

(497,904

)

47,119,714

 

22,176,991

 

Highline Oaks

 

Denver, CO

 

1986

 

220

 

1,057,400

 

9,340,249

 

—

 

1,545,586

 

1,057,400

 

10,885,834

 

11,943,234

 

(3,786,883

)

8,156,351

 

(K)

 

Isle at Arrowhead Ranch

 

Glendale, AZ

 

1996

 

256

 

1,650,237

 

19,593,123

 

—

 

908,786

 

1,650,237

 

20,501,910

 

22,152,147

 

(5,850,316

)

16,301,831

 

(N)

 

Jaclen Towers

 

Beverly, NJ

 

1976

 

100

 

437,072

 

2,921,735

 

—

 

679,638

 

437,072

 

3,601,373

 

4,038,445

 

(799,490

)

3,238,955

 

1,757,796

 

James Street Crossing

 

Kent, WA

 

1989

 

300

 

2,081,254

 

18,748,337

 

—

 

1,418,141

 

2,081,254

 

20,166,478

 

22,247,732

 

(6,017,581

)

16,230,151

 

16,379,123

 

Laguna Clara

 

Santa Clara, CA

 

1972

 

264

 

13,642,420

 

29,707,475

 

—

 

847,583

 

13,642,420

 

30,555,058

 

44,197,478

 

(2,301,822

)

41,895,656

 

16,699,685

 

Landings of Lake Zurich

 

Lake Zurich, IL

 

2000

 

206

 

2,250,338

 

17,490,436

 

—

 

401,224

 

2,250,338

 

17,891,660

 

20,141,998

 

(1,254,858

)

18,887,140

 

16,800,000

 

LaSalle

 

Beaverton, OR (G)

 

1998

 

554

 

7,202,000

 

35,877,612

 

—

 

1,258,084

 

7,202,000

 

37,135,696

 

44,337,696

 

(4,636,556

)

39,701,140

 

33,070,283

 

Legacy at Highlands Ranch

 

Highlands Ranch, CO

 

1999

 

422

 

6,330,000

 

37,557,013

 

—

 

527,912

 

6,330,000

 

38,084,925

 

44,414,925

 

(2,152,530

)

42,262,396

 

24,194,240

 

Legends at Preston

 

Morrisville, NC

 

2000

 

382

 

3,056,000

 

27,150,721

 

—

 

627,768

 

3,056,000

 

27,778,489

 

30,834,489

 

(5,399,551

)

25,434,938

 

(Q)

 

Liberty Park

 

Brain Tree, MA

 

2000

 

202

 

5,977,504

 

26,748,835

 

—

 

641,331

 

5,977,504

 

27,390,165

 

33,367,669

 

(2,755,933

)

30,611,736

 

26,500,000

 

Lincoln Heights

 

Quincy, MA

 

1991

 

336

 

5,928,400

 

33,595,262

 

—

 

1,752,432

 

5,928,400

 

35,347,694

 

41,276,094

 

(9,999,959

)

31,276,135

 

(O)

 

Longfellow Glen

 

Sudbury, MA

 

1984

 

120

 

1,094,273

 

7,314,994

 

—

 

1,699,013

 

1,094,273

 

9,014,007

 

10,108,281

 

(1,846,998

)

8,261,283

 

3,946,575

 

Longview Place

 

Waltham, MA

 

2004

 

348

 

20,880,000

 

90,254,989

 

—

 

11,446

 

20,880,000

 

90,266,435

 

111,146,435

 

(2,136,052

)

109,010,382

 

76,978,333

 

Longwood

 

Decatur, GA

 

1992

 

268

 

1,454,048

 

13,087,837

 

—

 

1,166,757

 

1,454,048

 

14,254,594

 

15,708,642

 

(6,052,266

)

9,656,375

 

(P)

 

Loomis Manor

 

West Hartford, CT

 

1948

 

43

 

422,350

 

2,823,326

 

—

 

258,756

 

422,350

 

3,082,082

 

3,504,432

 

(642,210

)

2,862,223

 

(M)

 

Madison at Cedar Springs

 

Dallas, TX

 

1995

 

380

 

2,470,000

 

33,194,620

 

—

 

1,414,972

 

2,470,000

 

34,609,593

 

37,079,593

 

(8,732,661

)

28,346,932

 

(O)

 

Madison at Chase Oaks

 

Plano, TX

 

1995

 

470

 

3,055,000

 

28,932,885

 

—

 

1,504,003

 

3,055,000

 

30,436,888

 

33,491,888

 

(8,044,341

)

25,447,547

 

(O)

 

Madison at River Sound

 

Lawrenceville, GA

 

1996

 

586

 

3,666,999

 

47,387,106

 

—

 

1,341,897

 

3,666,999

 

48,729,004

 

52,396,003

 

(12,442,242

)

39,953,761

 

(Q)

 

Madison at Round Grove

 

Lewisville, TX

 

1995

 

404

 

2,626,000

 

25,682,373

 

—

 

1,775,020

 

2,626,000

 

27,457,393

 

30,083,393

 

(7,170,748

)

22,912,645

 

(N)

 

Madison at Scofield Farms

 

Austin, TX

 

1996

 

260

 

2,080,000

 

14,597,971

 

—

 

1,280,838

 

2,080,000

 

15,878,809

 

17,958,809

 

(3,349,396

)

14,609,413

 

12,026,893

 

Marks

 

Englewood, CO (G)

 

1987

 

616

 

4,928,500

 

44,622,314

 

—

 

3,446,135

 

4,928,500

 

48,068,449

 

52,996,949

 

(15,211,950

)

37,785,000

 

19,195,000

 

McDowell Place

 

Naperville, IL

 

1988

 

400

 

2,580,400

 

23,209,629

 

—

 

2,773,334

 

2,580,400

 

25,982,963

 

28,563,363

 

(8,971,893

)

19,591,470

 

(O)

 

Meadow Ridge

 

Norwich, CT

 

1987

 

120

 

747,957

 

4,999,937

 

—

 

295,582

 

747,957

 

5,295,519

 

6,043,476

 

(1,063,903

)

4,979,572

 

4,252,657

 

Merritt at Satellite Place

 

Duluth, GA

 

1999

 

424

 

3,400,000

 

30,115,674

 

—

 

741,445

 

3,400,000

 

30,857,119

 

34,257,119

 

(6,896,280

)

27,360,839

 

(P)

 

Mill Pond

 

Millersville, MD

 

1984

 

240

 

2,880,000

 

8,468,462

 

—

 

1,413,990

 

2,880,000

 

9,882,451

 

12,762,451

 

(2,886,591

)

9,875,860

 

7,300,000

 

Montierra

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

1999

 

249

 

3,455,000

 

17,266,787

 

—

 

720,984

 

3,455,000

 

17,987,771

 

21,442,771

 

(4,330,178

)

17,112,593

 

(N)

 

Montierra (CA)

 

San Diego, CA

 

1990

 

272

 

8,160,000

 

29,360,938

 

—

 

3,021,902

 

8,160,000

 

32,382,840

 

40,542,840

 

(6,177,359

)

34,365,481

 

17,350,132

 

Nehoiden Glen

 

Needham, MA

 

1978

 

61

 

634,538

 

4,241,755

 

—

 

303,917

 

634,538

 

4,545,672

 

5,180,210

 

(891,830

)

4,288,379

 

1,205,728

 

Noonan Glen

 

Winchester, MA

 

1983

 

18

 

151,344

 

1,011,700

 

—

 

204,710

 

151,344

 

1,216,410

 

1,367,754

 

(248,561

)

1,119,193

 

417,937

 

North Hill

 

Atlanta, GA

 

1984

 

420

 

2,525,300

 

18,550,989

 

—

 

5,534,820

 

2,525,300

 

24,085,809

 

26,611,109

 

(9,386,416

)

17,224,693

 

15,005,000

 

Northampton 1

 

Largo, MD

 

1977

 

344

 

1,843,200

 

17,528,381

 

—

 

3,894,329

 

1,843,200

 

21,422,709

 

23,265,909

 

(9,522,455

)

13,743,454

 

18,846,256

 

 

S-10



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

Northglen

 

Valencia, CA

 

1988

 

234

 

9,360,000

 

20,778,553

 

—

 

790,240

 

9,360,000

 

21,568,792

 

30,928,792

 

(4,002,815

)

26,925,977

 

14,273,041

 

Norton Glen

 

Norton, MA

 

1983

 

150

 

1,012,556

 

6,768,727

 

—

 

1,745,053

 

1,012,556

 

8,513,780

 

9,526,335

 

(1,898,596

)

7,627,740

 

3,792,072

 

Oak Mill 2

 

Germantown, MD

 

1985

 

192

 

854,133

 

10,233,947

 

—

 

1,561,725

 

854,133

 

11,795,672

 

12,649,805

 

(4,042,002

)

8,607,803

 

9,600,000

 

Oak Mill I

 

Germantown, MD

 

1984

 

208

 

10,000,000

 

13,149,417

 

—

 

13,996

 

10,000,000

 

13,163,413

 

23,163,413

 

(117,058

)

23,046,355

 

14,372,725

 

Oak Park North

 

Agoura Hills, CA

 

1990

 

220

 

1,706,900

 

15,362,666

 

—

 

1,025,697

 

1,706,900

 

16,388,363

 

18,095,263

 

(5,939,454

)

12,155,808

 

(H

)

Oak Park South

 

Agoura Hills, CA

 

1989

 

224

 

1,683,800

 

15,154,608

 

—

 

1,113,968

 

1,683,800

 

16,268,576

 

17,952,376

 

(5,945,015

)

12,007,361

 

(H

)

Oaks

 

Santa Clarita, CA

 

2000

 

520

 

23,400,000

 

61,020,438

 

—

 

1,009,306

 

23,400,000

 

62,029,744

 

85,429,744

 

(5,822,945

)

79,606,799

 

44,767,808

 

Ocean Walk

 

Key West, FL

 

1990

 

297

 

2,838,749

 

25,545,009

 

—

 

1,726,982

 

2,838,749

 

27,271,990

 

30,110,739

 

(7,928,470

)

22,182,269

 

21,079,921

 

Old Mill Glen

 

Maynard, MA

 

1983

 

50

 

396,756

 

2,652,233

 

—

 

285,888

 

396,756

 

2,938,121

 

3,334,877

 

(595,717

)

2,739,160

 

1,604,392

 

Olde Redmond Place

 

Redmond, WA

 

1986

 

192

 

4,807,100

 

14,126,038

 

—

 

3,272,610

 

4,807,100

 

17,398,648

 

22,205,748

 

(4,403,664

)

17,802,084

 

(O

)

Overlook Manor II

 

Frederick, MD

 

1980/1985

 

182

 

2,186,300

 

6,262,597

 

—

 

452,542

 

2,186,300

 

6,715,139

 

8,901,439

 

(1,910,126

)

6,991,314

 

5,085,000

 

Phillips Park

 

Wellesley, MA

 

1988

 

49

 

816,922

 

5,460,955

 

—

 

477,110

 

816,922

 

5,938,065

 

6,754,987

 

(1,087,139

)

5,667,848

 

3,800,012

 

Plum Tree

 

Hales Corners, WI

 

1989

 

332

 

1,996,700

 

20,247,195

 

—

 

1,316,338

 

1,996,700

 

21,563,533

 

23,560,233

 

(6,330,072

)

17,230,161

 

(L

)

Point (NC)

 

Charlotte, NC

 

1996

 

340

 

1,700,000

 

25,417,267

 

—

 

719,223

 

1,700,000

 

26,136,490

 

27,836,490

 

(6,752,589

)

21,083,901

 

(P

)

Portofino (Val)

 

Valencia, CA

 

1989

 

216

 

8,640,000

 

21,487,126

 

—

 

762,405

 

8,640,000

 

22,249,532

 

30,889,532

 

(4,044,046

)

26,845,486

 

13,880,418

 

Portside Towers

 

Jersey City, NJ (G)

 

1992/1997

 

527

 

22,455,700

 

96,842,913

 

—

 

5,208,748

 

22,455,700

 

102,051,661

 

124,507,361

 

(27,047,162

)

97,460,198

 

52,690,692

 

Prairie Creek I

 

Richardson, TX

 

1998/99

 

464

 

4,067,292

 

38,986,022

 

—

 

1,346,376

 

4,067,292

 

40,332,399

 

44,399,690

 

(9,780,189

)

34,619,502

 

(N

)

Preston Bend

 

Dallas, TX

 

1986

 

255

 

1,075,200

 

9,532,056

 

—

 

1,245,607

 

1,075,200

 

10,777,663

 

11,852,863

 

(3,601,057

)

8,251,806

 

(K

)

Promenade at Town Center II

 

Valencia, CA

 

2001

 

270

 

13,500,000

 

34,405,636

 

—

 

483,076

 

13,500,000

 

34,888,713

 

48,388,713

 

(2,681,138

)

45,707,575

 

35,946,350

 

Providence at Kirby

 

Houston, TX

 

1999

 

263

 

3,945,000

 

20,587,782

 

—

 

1,882,569

 

3,945,000

 

22,470,351

 

26,415,351

 

(2,919,302

)

23,496,049

 

17,730,269

 

Ranchstone

 

Houston, TX

 

1996

 

220

 

770,000

 

15,371,431

 

—

 

612,588

 

770,000

 

15,984,019

 

16,754,019

 

(4,172,975

)

12,581,044

 

(P

)

Ravens Crest

 

Plainsboro, NJ

 

1984

 

704

 

4,670,850

 

42,080,642

 

—

 

7,011,709

 

4,670,850

 

49,092,351

 

53,763,201

 

(20,071,732

)

33,691,469

 

(O

)

Ravinia

 

Greenfield, WI

 

1991

 

206

 

1,240,100

 

12,055,713

 

—

 

782,644

 

1,240,100

 

12,838,357

 

14,078,457

 

(3,793,327

)

10,285,131

 

(L

)

Reserve at Ashley Lake

 

Boynton Beach, FL

 

1990

 

440

 

3,520,400

 

23,332,494

 

—

 

2,063,288

 

3,520,400

 

25,395,782

 

28,916,182

 

(7,661,990

)

21,254,191

 

24,150,000

 

Reserve at Fairfax Corners

 

Fairfax, VA

 

2001

 

652

 

15,804,057

 

63,129,051

 

—

 

605,979

 

15,804,057

 

63,735,029

 

79,539,086

 

(7,863,402

)

71,675,685

 

(Q

)

Reserve at Town Center

 

Loudon, VA

 

2002

 

290

 

3,144,056

 

27,669,121

 

—

 

336,349

 

3,144,056

 

28,005,470

 

31,149,526

 

(2,060,275

)

29,089,251

 

26,500,000

 

Retreat, The

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

1999

 

480

 

3,475,114

 

27,265,252

 

—

 

1,134,386

 

3,475,114

 

28,399,638

 

31,874,752

 

(6,709,447

)

25,165,305

 

(P

)

Ribbon Mill

 

Manchester, CT

 

1908

 

104

 

787,929

 

5,267,144

 

—

 

368,398

 

787,929

 

5,635,542

 

6,423,471

 

(1,133,987

)

5,289,484

 

4,243,352

 

River Pointe at Den Rock Park

 

Lawrence, MA

 

2000

 

174

 

4,615,702

 

18,440,147

 

—

 

600,854

 

4,615,702

 

19,041,001

 

23,656,703

 

(2,201,363

)

21,455,340

 

18,100,000

 

Rivers Bend (CT)

 

Windsor, CT

 

1973

 

373

 

3,325,517

 

22,573,826

 

—

 

1,249,995

 

3,325,517

 

23,823,821

 

27,149,337

 

(4,599,927

)

22,549,410

 

(M

)

Riverview Condominiums

 

Norwalk, CT

 

1991

 

92

 

2,300,000

 

7,406,730

 

—

 

1,353,218

 

2,300,000

 

8,759,948

 

11,059,948

 

(2,089,209

)

8,970,739

 

5,863,216

 

Rockingham Glen

 

West Roxbury, MA

 

1974

 

143

 

1,124,217

 

7,515,160

 

—

 

663,565

 

1,124,217

 

8,178,725

 

9,302,942

 

(1,641,669

)

7,661,273

 

2,096,343

 

Rolling Green (Amherst)

 

Amherst, MA

 

1970

 

204

 

1,340,702

 

8,962,317

 

—

 

2,123,769

 

1,340,702

 

11,086,087

 

12,426,789

 

(2,372,911

)

10,053,878

 

3,382,118

 

Rolling Green (Milford)

 

Milford, MA

 

1970

 

304

 

2,012,350

 

13,452,150

 

—

 

1,703,518

 

2,012,350

 

15,155,668

 

17,168,018

 

(3,423,616

)

13,744,402

 

6,789,441

 

Royal Oak

 

Eagan, MN

 

1989

 

231

 

1,602,904

 

14,423,662

 

—

 

1,576,041

 

1,602,904

 

15,999,704

 

17,602,607

 

(4,897,825

)

12,704,782

 

13,139,491

 

Royale

 

Cranston, RI

 

1976

 

76

 

512,785

 

3,427,866

 

—

 

420,652

 

512,785

 

3,848,518

 

4,361,304

 

(792,714

)

3,568,590

 

(M

)

Scarborough Square

 

Rockville, MD

 

1967

 

121

 

1,815,000

 

7,608,126

 

—

 

1,248,460

 

1,815,000

 

8,856,586

 

10,671,586

 

(2,554,389

)

8,117,197

 

4,734,584

 

Security Manor

 

Westfield, MA

 

1971

 

63

 

355,456

 

2,376,152

 

—

 

64,155

 

355,456

 

2,440,307

 

2,795,764

 

(493,204

)

2,302,560

 

(M

)

Sedona Springs

 

Austin, TX

 

1995

 

396

 

2,574,000

 

23,477,043

 

—

 

2,199,164

 

2,574,000

 

25,676,207

 

28,250,207

 

(6,902,982

)

21,347,225

 

(P

)

Siena Terrace

 

Lake Forest, CA

 

1988

 

356

 

8,900,000

 

24,083,024

 

—

 

1,527,443

 

8,900,000

 

25,610,467

 

34,510,467

 

(6,438,776

)

28,071,691

 

17,041,312

 

Skycrest

 

Valencia, CA

 

1999

 

264

 

10,560,000

 

25,574,457

 

—

 

991,398

 

10,560,000

 

26,565,856

 

37,125,856

 

(4,806,652

)

32,319,204

 

17,273,108

 

Skyline Towers

 

Falls Church, VA (G)

 

1971

 

939

 

78,278,200

 

91,445,397

 

—

 

(4,997)

 

78,278,200

 

91,440,400

 

169,718,600

 

(293,091

)

169,425,509

 

93,746,430

 

Skyview

 

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA

 

1999

 

260

 

3,380,000

 

21,953,151

 

—

 

590,295

 

3,380,000

 

22,543,446

 

25,923,446

 

(5,267,823

)

20,655,623

 

(P

)

Sonterra at Foothill Ranch

 

Foothill Ranch, CA

 

1997

 

300

 

7,503,400

 

24,048,507

 

—

 

943,899

 

7,503,400

 

24,992,406

 

32,495,806

 

(6,861,329

)

25,634,477

 

(O

)

South Winds

 

Fall River, MA

 

1971

 

404

 

2,481,821

 

16,780,359

 

—

 

1,924,482

 

2,481,821

 

18,704,841

 

21,186,663

 

(4,080,086

)

17,106,576

 

6,737,850

 

Spinnaker Cove

 

Hermitage, TN

 

1986

 

278

 

1,461,731

 

12,770,421

 

—

 

2,721,311

 

1,461,731

 

15,491,732

 

16,953,463

 

(5,112,533

)

11,840,930

 

(K

)

Springs Colony

 

Altamonte Springs, FL

 

1986

 

188

 

630,411

 

5,852,157

 

—

 

1,587,505

 

630,411

 

7,439,662

 

8,070,073

 

(3,415,025

)

4,655,048

 

(K

)

Stoney Ridge

 

Dale City, VA

 

1985

 

264

 

8,000,000

 

24,146,091

 

—

 

12,292

 

8,000,000

 

24,158,383

 

32,158,383

 

(308,454

)

31,849,929

 

16,777,082

 

Stonybrook

 

Boynton Beach, FL

 

2001

 

264

 

10,500,000

 

24,967,638

 

—

 

102,822

 

10,500,000

 

25,070,461

 

35,570,461

 

(943,992

)

34,626,468

 

22,813,441

 

Sturbridge Meadows

 

Sturbridge, MA

 

1985

 

104

 

702,447

 

4,695,714

 

—

 

407,978

 

702,447

 

5,103,692

 

5,806,139

 

(998,731

)

4,807,408

 

2,068,395

 

Summer Chase

 

Denver, CO

 

1983

 

384

 

1,709,200

 

15,375,008

 

—

 

2,738,226

 

1,709,200

 

18,113,234

 

19,822,434

 

(6,972,615

)

12,849,819

 

(N

)

Summerhill Glen

 

Maynard, MA

 

1980

 

120

 

415,812

 

3,000,816

 

—

 

449,859

 

415,812

 

3,450,675

 

3,866,487

 

(791,275

)

3,075,212

 

1,708,377

 

Summerset Village

 

Chatsworth, CA

 

1985

 

280

 

2,630,700

 

23,670,889

 

—

 

1,705,533

 

2,630,700

 

25,376,422

 

28,007,122

 

(8,271,581

)

19,735,541

 

(N

)

Summit & Birch Hill

 

Farmington, CT

 

1967

 

186

 

1,757,438

 

11,748,112

 

—

 

1,119,338

 

1,757,438

 

12,867,451

 

14,624,889

 

(2,485,725

)

12,139,164

 

(M

)

Talleyrand

 

Tarrytown, NY (K)

 

1997-98

 

300

 

12,000,000

 

49,838,160

 

—

 

953,955

 

12,000,000

 

50,792,115

 

62,792,115

 

(7,769,168

)

55,022,948

 

35,000,000

 

Tanasbourne Terrace

 

Hillsboro, OR

 

1986-89

 

373

 

1,876,700

 

16,891,205

 

—

 

2,705,571

 

1,876,700

 

19,596,775

 

21,473,475

 

(8,449,961

)

13,023,514

 

(N

)

Tanglewood (RI)

 

West Warwick, RI

 

1973

 

176

 

1,141,415

 

7,630,129

 

—

 

482,283

 

1,141,415

 

8,112,412

 

9,253,828

 

(1,599,886

)

7,653,941

 

6,216,138

 

Tanglewood (VA)

 

Manassas, VA

 

1987

 

432

 

2,108,295

 

24,619,495

 

—

 

4,979,155

 

2,108,295

 

29,598,650

 

31,706,945

 

(9,934,840

)

21,772,105

 

25,110,000

 

Trails (CO), The

 

Aurora, CO

 

1986

 

351

 

1,217,900

 

8,877,205

 

—

 

3,364,399

 

1,217,900

 

12,241,604

 

13,459,504

 

(6,114,425

)

7,345,079

 

(N

)

Trailway Pond I

 

Burnsville, MN

 

1988

 

75

 

479,284

 

4,312,144

 

—

 

670,781

 

479,284

 

4,982,925

 

5,462,209

 

(1,560,119

)

3,902,090

 

4,909,210

 

Trailway Pond II

 

Burnsville, MN

 

1988

 

165

 

1,107,288

 

9,961,409

 

—

 

1,264,662

 

1,107,288

 

11,226,070

 

12,333,358

 

(3,372,755

)

8,960,603

 

11,354,755

 

Turf Club

 

Littleton, CO

 

1986

 

324

 

2,107,300

 

15,478,040

 

—

 

2,331,314

 

2,107,300

 

17,809,354

 

19,916,654

 

(5,600,898

)

14,315,756

 

(P

)

Valley Creek I

 

Woodbury, MN

 

1989

 

225

 

1,626,715

 

14,634,831

 

—

 

2,142,430

 

1,626,715

 

16,777,262

 

18,403,977

 

(5,213,088

)

13,190,889

 

12,815,000

 

Valley Creek II

 

Woodbury, MN

 

1990

 

177

 

1,232,659

 

11,097,830

 

—

 

1,244,010

 

1,232,659

 

12,341,841

 

13,574,500

 

(3,698,943

)

9,875,557

 

10,100,000

 

Van Deene Manor

 

West Springfield, MA

 

1970

 

111

 

744,491

 

4,976,771

 

—

 

378,374

 

744,491

 

5,355,144

 

6,099,636

 

(1,060,400

)

5,039,236

 

(M

)

Villa Encanto

 

Phoenix, AZ

 

1983

 

383

 

2,884,447

 

22,197,363

 

—

 

2,354,828

 

2,884,447

 

24,552,190

 

27,436,637

 

(7,756,484

)

19,680,153

 

(P

)

Village at Bear Creek

 

Lakewood, CO

 

1987

 

472

 

4,519,700

 

40,676,390

 

—

 

2,218,185

 

4,519,700

 

42,894,575

 

47,414,275

 

(12,926,750

)

34,487,525

 

(O

)

Villas at Josey Ranch

 

Carrollton, TX

 

1986

 

198

 

1,587,700

 

7,254,727

 

—

 

1,652,003

 

1,587,700

 

8,906,730

 

10,494,430

 

(2,633,479

)

7,860,951

 

6,206,940

 

Warwick Station

 

Westminster, CO

 

1986

 

332

 

2,282,000

 

21,113,974

 

—

 

1,315,806

 

2,282,000

 

22,429,781

 

24,711,781

 

(6,810,985

)

17,900,796

 

8,355,000

 

Waterford at Orange Park

 

Orange Park, FL

 

1986

 

280

 

1,960,000

 

12,098,784

 

—

 

2,083,596

 

1,960,000

 

14,182,381

 

16,142,381

 

(4,381,614

)

11,760,767

 

9,540,000

 

Waterford at the Lakes

 

Kent, WA

 

1990

 

344

 

3,100,200

 

16,140,924

 

—

 

1,608,708

 

3,100,200

 

17,749,631

 

20,849,831

 

(5,959,977

)

14,889,854

 

(Q

)

 

 

S-11



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

Wellington Hill

 

Manchester, NH

 

1987

 

390

 

1,890,200

 

17,120,662

 

—

 

4,413,485

 

1,890,200

 

21,534,147

 

23,424,347

 

(9,338,165

)

14,086,182

 

(K

)

Westwood Glen

 

Westwood, MA

 

1972

 

156

 

1,616,505

 

10,806,004

 

—

 

333,847

 

1,616,505

 

11,139,851

 

12,756,356

 

(2,133,152

)

10,623,204

 

1,109,277

 

White Bear Woods

 

White Bear Lake, MN

 

1989

 

225

 

1,624,741

 

14,618,490

 

—

 

1,714,275

 

1,624,741

 

16,332,765

 

17,957,506

 

(4,915,041

)

13,042,465

 

14,172,876

 

Wilkins Glen

 

Medfield, MA

 

1975

 

103

 

538,483

 

3,629,943

 

—

 

555,943

 

538,483

 

4,185,886

 

4,724,369

 

(901,943

)

3,822,426

 

1,523,239

 

Wimbledon Oaks

 

Arlington, TX

 

1985

 

248

 

1,491,700

 

8,843,716

 

—

 

2,049,217

 

1,491,700

 

10,892,934

 

12,384,634

 

(3,089,020

)

9,295,613

 

6,825,689

 

Windridge (CA)

 

Laguna Niguel, CA

 

1989

 

344

 

2,662,900

 

23,985,497

 

—

 

2,731,296

 

2,662,900

 

26,716,793

 

29,379,693

 

(10,788,009

)

18,591,683

 

(H

)

Woodbridge

 

Cary, NC

 

1993-95

 

128

 

737,400

 

6,636,870

 

—

 

942,704

 

737,400

 

7,579,574

 

8,316,974

 

(2,746,029

)

5,570,945

 

4,262,939

 

Woodbridge (CT)

 

Newington, CT

 

1968

 

73

 

498,377

 

3,331,548

 

—

 

304,440

 

498,377

 

3,635,988

 

4,134,365

 

(712,086

)

3,422,279

 

(M

)

Woodlake (WA)

 

Kirkland, WA

 

1984

 

288

 

6,631,400

 

16,735,484

 

—

 

1,716,896

 

6,631,400

 

18,452,380

 

25,083,780

 

(5,206,819

)

19,876,961

 

(O

)

Woodlands of Brookfield

 

Brookfield, WI

 

1990

 

148

 

1,484,600

 

13,961,081

 

—

 

1,100,025

 

1,484,600

 

15,061,106

 

16,545,706

 

(4,291,189

)

12,254,518

 

(L

)

Woodleaf

 

Campbell, CA

 

1984

 

178

 

8,550,600

 

16,988,183

 

—

 

738,217

 

8,550,600

 

17,726,399

 

26,276,999

 

(4,787,172

)

21,489,828

 

(O

)

Woodridge (MN)

 

Eagan, MN

 

1986

 

200

 

1,602,300

 

10,449,579

 

—

 

1,414,309

 

1,602,300

 

11,863,888

 

13,466,188

 

(3,532,925

)

9,933,263

 

7,171,819

 

EQR Wholly Owned Encumbered

 

 

 

 

 

50,068

 

797,040,287

 

3,608,322,861

 

—

 

261,759,320

 

797,040,287

 

3,870,082,181

 

4,667,122,468

 

(850,889,678

)

3,816,232,790

 

1,637,238,367

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lexford Wholly Owned Unencumbered:  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acadia Court II

 

Bloomington, IN

 

1986

 

104

 

253,636

 

2,234,632

 

—

 

291,971

 

253,636

 

2,526,603

 

2,780,239

 

(663,703

)

2,116,535

 

—

 

Ambergate (FL)

 

W. Palm Beach, FL

 

1987

 

72

 

730,000

 

1,687,743

 

—

 

236,120

 

730,000

 

1,923,863

 

2,653,863

 

(442,135

)

2,211,728

 

—

 

Amberidge

 

Roseville, MI

 

1985

 

45

 

130,844

 

1,152,880

 

—

 

225,011

 

130,844

 

1,377,891

 

1,508,736

 

(365,194

)

1,143,541

 

—

 

Amesbury II

 

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

1987

 

81

 

180,588

 

1,591,229

 

—

 

242,919

 

180,588

 

1,834,148

 

2,014,736

 

(479,092

)

1,535,644

 

—

 

Amhurst (Tol)

 

Toledo, OH

 

1983

 

58

 

161,854

 

1,426,108

 

—

 

184,606

 

161,854

 

1,610,714

 

1,772,567

 

(394,938

)

1,377,629

 

—

 

Amhurst I (OH)

 

Dayton, OH

 

1979

 

73

 

152,574

 

1,344,353

 

—

 

348,329

 

152,574

 

1,692,681

 

1,845,255

 

(498,953

)

1,346,302

 

—

 

Amhurst II (OH)

 

Dayton, OH

 

1981

 

74

 

159,416

 

1,404,632

 

—

 

208,133

 

159,416

 

1,612,766

 

1,772,182

 

(428,517

)

1,343,665

 

—

 

Andover Court

 

Mt. Vernon, OH

 

1982

 

51

 

123,875

 

1,091,272

 

—

 

302,669

 

123,875

 

1,393,941

 

1,517,815

 

(373,438

)

1,144,378

 

—

 

Annhurst (MD) (REIT)

 

Belcamp, MD

 

1984

 

67

 

232,575

 

2,093,165

 

—

 

249,273

 

232,575

 

2,342,438

 

2,575,013

 

(457,693

)

2,117,319

 

—

 

Annhurst (PA)

 

Clairton, PA

 

1984

 

97

 

307,952

 

2,713,397

 

—

 

515,088

 

307,952

 

3,228,484

 

3,536,437

 

(825,511

)

2,710,926

 

—

 

Annhurst II (OH)

 

Gahanna, OH

 

1986

 

56

 

116,739

 

1,028,595

 

—

 

229,126

 

116,739

 

1,257,721

 

1,374,460

 

(362,192

)

1,012,267

 

—

 

Annhurst III (OH)

 

Gahanna, OH

 

1988

 

52

 

134,788

 

1,187,629

 

—

 

151,366

 

134,788

 

1,338,995

 

1,473,783

 

(348,690

)

1,125,094

 

—

 

Apple Ridge III

 

Circleville, OH

 

1982

 

30

 

72,585

 

639,356

 

—

 

100,461

 

72,585

 

739,816

 

812,402

 

(186,251

)

626,151

 

—

 

Applegate (Col)

 

Columbus, IN

 

1982

 

58

 

171,829

 

1,514,002

 

—

 

231,612

 

171,829

 

1,745,613

 

1,917,443

 

(434,228

)

1,483,215

 

—

 

Aragon Woods

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1986

 

67

 

157,791

 

1,390,010

 

—

 

136,037

 

157,791

 

1,526,047

 

1,683,838

 

(397,237

)

1,286,601

 

—

 

Ashgrove (IN)

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1983

 

57

 

172,924

 

1,523,549

 

—

 

172,077

 

172,924

 

1,695,625

 

1,868,549

 

(422,855

)

1,445,694

 

—

 

Ashgrove (KY)

 

Louisville, KY

 

1984

 

60

 

171,816

 

1,514,034

 

—

 

250,171

 

171,816

 

1,764,205

 

1,936,021

 

(467,552

)

1,468,468

 

—

 

Autumn Cove

 

Lithonia, GA

 

1985

 

48

 

187,220

 

1,649,515

 

—

 

243,101

 

187,220

 

1,892,616

 

2,079,836

 

(455,360

)

1,624,477

 

—

 

Beckford Place (Pla)

 

The Plains, OH

 

1982

 

60

 

161,161

 

1,420,002

 

—

 

273,333

 

161,161

 

1,693,335

 

1,854,496

 

(424,550

)

1,429,946

 

—

 

Beckford Place I (OH)

 

N Canton, OH

 

1983

 

60

 

168,426

 

1,484,248

 

—

 

283,546

 

168,426

 

1,767,794

 

1,936,220

 

(451,851

)

1,484,369

 

—

 

Beckford Place II (OH)

 

N Canton, OH

 

1985

 

60

 

172,134

 

1,516,691

 

—

 

214,193

 

172,134

 

1,730,884

 

1,903,018

 

(421,162

)

1,481,856

 

—

 

Bel Aire I

 

Miami, FL

 

1985

 

70

 

188,343

 

1,658,995

 

—

 

298,940

 

188,343

 

1,957,935

 

2,146,278

 

(500,829

)

1,645,449

 

—

 

Bel Aire II

 

Miami, FL

 

1986

 

51

 

136,416

 

1,201,075

 

—

 

204,830

 

136,416

 

1,405,906

 

1,542,322

 

(362,582

)

1,179,740

 

—

 

Berry Pines

 

Milton, FL

 

1985

 

64

 

154,086

 

1,299,939

 

—

 

388,027

 

154,086

 

1,687,966

 

1,842,052

 

(507,532

)

1,334,521

 

—

 

Blueberry Hill I

 

Leesburg, FL

 

1986

 

68

 

140,370

 

1,236,710

 

—

 

225,657

 

140,370

 

1,462,368

 

1,602,737

 

(397,093

)

1,205,644

 

—

 

Branchwood

 

Winter Park, FL

 

1981

 

117

 

324,069

 

2,855,397

 

—

 

553,888

 

324,069

 

3,409,285

 

3,733,353

 

(906,036

)

2,827,318

 

—

 

Brandon Court

 

Bloomington, IN

 

1984

 

78

 

170,636

 

1,503,487

 

—

 

401,406

 

170,636

 

1,904,893

 

2,075,529

 

(552,317

)

1,523,212

 

—

 

Broadview Oaks (REIT)

 

Pensacola, FL

 

1985

 

90

 

201,000

 

1,809,185

 

—

 

339,353

 

201,000

 

2,148,538

 

2,349,538

 

(468,662

)

1,880,876

 

—

 

Cambridge Commons I

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1986

 

86

 

179,139

 

1,578,077

 

—

 

682,269

 

179,139

 

2,260,346

 

2,439,485

 

(692,221

)

1,747,265

 

—

 

Cambridge Commons III

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1988

 

75

 

98,125

 

864,738

 

—

 

354,928

 

98,125

 

1,219,666

 

1,317,790

 

(406,043

)

911,747

 

—

 

Camellia Court I (Col)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1981

 

64

 

133,059

 

1,172,393

 

—

 

296,817

 

133,059

 

1,469,210

 

1,602,268

 

(407,633

)

1,194,636

 

—

 

Camellia Court II (Day)

 

Dayton, OH

 

1982

 

53

 

131,571

 

1,159,283

 

—

 

186,313

 

131,571

 

1,345,595

 

1,477,166

 

(348,365

)

1,128,801

 

—

 

Canterbury Crossings

 

Lake Mary, FL

 

1983

 

71

 

273,671

 

2,411,538

 

—

 

403,038

 

273,671

 

2,814,575

 

3,088,246

 

(677,127

)

2,411,119

 

—

 

Capital Ridge (REIT)

 

Tallahassee, FL

 

1983

 

70

 

177,900

 

1,601,157

 

—

 

276,196

 

177,900

 

1,877,353

 

2,055,253

 

(388,210

)

1,667,043

 

—

 

Carriage Hill

 

Dublin, GA

 

1985

 

60

 

131,911

 

1,162,577

 

—

 

251,627

 

131,911

 

1,414,204

 

1,546,115

 

(334,500

)

1,211,615

 

—

 

Cedargate (GA)

 

Lawrenceville, GA

 

1983

 

55

 

205,043

 

1,806,656

 

—

 

143,231

 

205,043

 

1,949,887

 

2,154,931

 

(460,458

)

1,694,472

 

—

 

Cedargate I (IN)

 

Bloomington, IN

 

1983

 

68

 

191,650

 

1,688,648

 

—

 

293,078

 

191,650

 

1,981,726

 

2,173,377

 

(529,313

)

1,644,063

 

—

 

Cedargate II (IN)

 

Bloomington, IN

 

1985

 

58

 

165,041

 

1,454,189

 

—

 

219,096

 

165,041

 

1,673,284

 

1,838,325

 

(432,046

)

1,406,279

 

—

 

Cedargate II (OH)

 

Lancaster, OH

 

1983

 

47

 

87,618

 

771,912

 

—

 

151,619

 

87,618

 

923,531

 

1,011,149

 

(251,719

)

759,430

 

—

 

Cedarwood I (KY)

 

Lexington, KY

 

1984

 

50

 

106,681

 

939,874

 

—

 

355,406

 

106,681

 

1,295,281

 

1,401,961

 

(358,855

)

1,043,106

 

—

 

Cedarwood II (FL)

 

Ocala, FL

 

1980

 

39

 

98,372

 

866,769

 

—

 

203,345

 

98,372

 

1,070,114

 

1,168,486

 

(264,434

)

904,052

 

—

 

Cedarwood III (KY)

 

Lexington, KY

 

1986

 

48

 

102,491

 

902,659

 

—

 

219,663

 

102,491

 

1,122,323

 

1,224,814

 

(293,524

)

931,290

 

—

 

Centre Lake III

 

Miami, FL

 

1986

 

234

 

685,601

 

6,039,979

 

—

 

999,491

 

685,601

 

7,039,470

 

7,725,071

 

(1,789,348

)

5,935,723

 

—

 

Charing Cross

 

Bowling Green, OH

 

1978

 

67

 

154,584

 

1,362,057

 

—

 

267,864

 

154,584

 

1,629,921

 

1,784,506

 

(433,026

)

1,351,480

 

—

 

Cherry Tree

 

Rosedale, MD

 

1986

 

100

 

352,003

 

3,101,017

 

—

 

368,388

 

352,003

 

3,469,405

 

3,821,408

 

(857,875

)

2,963,533

 

—

 

Clearview II

 

Greenwood, IN

 

1987

 

80

 

226,963

 

1,999,792

 

—

 

200,698

 

226,963

 

2,200,490

 

2,427,453

 

(560,411

)

1,867,042

 

—

 

Concord Square (IN)

 

Kokomo, IN

 

1983

 

49

 

123,247

 

1,085,962

 

—

 

171,497

 

123,247

 

1,257,459

 

1,380,705

 

(327,943

)

1,052,762

 

—

 

Concord Square I (OH)

 

Mansfield, OH

 

1981/83

 

72

 

164,124

 

1,446,313

 

—

 

280,173

 

164,124

 

1,726,486

 

1,890,610

 

(448,466

)

1,442,144

 

—

 

Countryside I

 

Daytona Beach, FL

 

1982

 

59

 

136,665

 

1,204,164

 

—

 

422,181

 

136,665

 

1,626,345

 

1,763,009

 

(474,813

)

1,288,197

 

—

 

Countryside II

 

Daytona Beach, FL

 

1982

 

97

 

234,633

 

2,067,376

 

—

 

333,252

 

234,633

 

2,400,627

 

2,635,261

 

(620,264

)

2,014,997

 

—

 

Countryside III (REIT)

 

Daytona Beach, FL

 

1983

 

34

 

80,000

 

719,868

 

—

 

117,332

 

80,000

 

837,201

 

917,201

 

(177,928

)

739,272

 

—

 

Countryside Manor

 

Douglasville, GA

 

1985

 

82

 

298,186

 

2,627,348

 

—

 

347,820

 

298,186

 

2,975,167

 

3,273,354

 

(758,463

)

2,514,891

 

—

 

Dartmouth Place I

 

Kent, OH

 

1982

 

53

 

151,771

 

1,337,422

 

—

 

301,903

 

151,771

 

1,639,324

 

1,791,095

 

(454,722

)

1,336,373

 

—

 

Dartmouth Place II

 

Kent, OH

 

1986

 

49

 

130,102

 

1,146,337

 

—

 

238,119

 

130,102

 

1,384,456

 

1,514,558

 

(360,944

)

1,153,614

 

—

 

Dover Place I

 

Eastlake, OH

 

1982

 

64

 

244,294

 

2,152,494

 

—

 

321,468

 

244,294

 

2,473,962

 

2,718,256

 

(632,408

)

2,085,848

 

—

 

Elmwood (GA)

 

Marietta, GA

 

1984

 

48

 

183,756

 

1,619,095

 

—

 

285,293

 

183,756

 

1,904,388

 

2,088,144

 

(476,332

)

1,611,813

 

—

 

 

S-12



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

Forest Glen

 

Pensacola, FL

 

1986

 

73

 

161,548

 

1,423,618

 

—

 

308,382

 

161,548

 

1,732,000

 

1,893,549

 

(502,392

)

1,391,157

 

—

 

Forest Village

 

Macon, GA

 

1983

 

83

 

224,022

 

1,973,876

 

—

 

371,691

 

224,022

 

2,345,567

 

2,569,589

 

(573,618

)

1,995,971

 

—

 

Forsythia Court II (MD)

 

Abingdon, MD

 

1987

 

76

 

239,834

 

2,113,339

 

—

 

350,471

 

239,834

 

2,463,810

 

2,703,644

 

(633,927

)

2,069,717

 

—

 

Foxhaven

 

Canton, OH

 

1986

 

107

 

256,821

 

2,263,172

 

—

 

537,010

 

256,821

 

2,800,182

 

3,057,003

 

(766,758

)

2,290,245

 

—

 

Foxton (MI)

 

Monroe, MI

 

1983

 

51

 

156,363

 

1,377,824

 

—

 

331,231

 

156,363

 

1,709,055

 

1,865,417

 

(418,091

)

1,447,326

 

—

 

Foxton II (OH)

 

Dayton, OH

 

1983

 

80

 

165,806

 

1,460,832

 

—

 

224,566

 

165,806

 

1,685,398

 

1,851,204

 

(431,004

)

1,420,200

 

—

 

Garden Court

 

Detroit, MI

 

1988

 

102

 

351,532

 

3,096,890

 

—

 

324,551

 

351,532

 

3,421,441

 

3,772,973

 

(813,289

)

2,959,684

 

—

 

Garden Terrace I

 

Tampa, FL

 

1981

 

59

 

93,144

 

820,699

 

—

 

409,616

 

93,144

 

1,230,315

 

1,323,459

 

(382,494

)

940,966

 

—

 

Garden Terrace II

 

Tampa, FL

 

1982

 

65

 

97,120

 

855,730

 

—

 

398,002

 

97,120

 

1,253,733

 

1,350,852

 

(385,751

)

965,101

 

—

 

Garden Terrace III (REIT)

 

Tampa, FL

 

1984

 

91

 

271,642

 

2,445,376

 

—

 

3,758

 

271,642

 

2,449,135

 

2,720,777

 

(26,093

)

2,694,683

 

—

 

Greengate (FL)

 

W. Palm Beach, FL

 

1987

 

120

 

2,500,000

 

1,615,859

 

—

 

371,938

 

2,500,000

 

1,987,797

 

4,487,797

 

(503,720

)

3,984,077

 

—

 

Greenglen (Day)

 

Dayton, OH

 

1983

 

76

 

204,289

 

1,800,172

 

—

 

317,286

 

204,289

 

2,117,458

 

2,321,747

 

(567,630

)

1,754,117

 

—

 

Greenglen II (Tol)

 

Toledo, OH

 

1982

 

58

 

162,264

 

1,429,719

 

—

 

241,484

 

162,264

 

1,671,203

 

1,833,467

 

(414,471

)

1,418,996

 

—

 

Greenwood Villas

 

Lake Mary, FL

 

1984

 

56

 

450,000

 

2,465,447

 

—

 

360,785

 

450,000

 

2,826,232

 

3,276,232

 

(171,471

)

3,104,761

 

—

 

Harbinwood

 

Norcross, GA

 

1985

 

72

 

236,761

 

2,086,122

 

—

 

420,733

 

236,761

 

2,506,855

 

2,743,616

 

(630,775

)

2,112,841

 

—

 

Hartwick

 

Tipton, IN

 

1982

 

44

 

123,791

 

1,090,729

 

—

 

189,233

 

123,791

 

1,279,963

 

1,403,753

 

(343,881

)

1,059,872

 

—

 

Harvest Grove II

 

Gahanna, OH

 

1987

 

57

 

148,792

 

1,310,818

 

—

 

217,272

 

148,792

 

1,528,089

 

1,676,881

 

(374,280

)

1,302,601

 

—

 

Heathmoore (KY)

 

Louisville, KY

 

1983

 

62

 

156,840

 

1,381,730

 

—

 

315,602

 

156,840

 

1,697,332

 

1,854,172

 

(438,578

)

1,415,594

 

—

 

Heathmoore II (MI)

 

Canton, MI

 

1986

 

51

 

170,433

 

1,501,697

 

—

 

191,250

 

170,433

 

1,692,946

 

1,863,379

 

(420,218

)

1,443,161

 

—

 

Hickory Mill

 

Hilliard, OH

 

1980

 

60

 

161,714

 

1,424,682

 

—

 

402,657

 

161,714

 

1,827,339

 

1,989,054

 

(493,981

)

1,495,072

 

—

 

High Points

 

New Port Richey, FL

 

1986

 

95

 

222,308

 

1,958,772

 

—

 

552,136

 

222,308

 

2,510,909

 

2,733,217

 

(706,606

)

2,026,610

 

—

 

Hillside Manor

 

Americus, GA

 

1985

 

60

 

102,632

 

904,111

 

—

 

472,842

 

102,632

 

1,376,954

 

1,479,586

 

(408,911

)

1,070,674

 

—

 

Holly Ridge

 

Pembroke Park, FL

 

1986

 

98

 

295,596

 

2,603,985

 

—

 

406,119

 

295,596

 

3,010,104

 

3,305,699

 

(774,767

)

2,530,932

 

—

 

Holly Sands I

 

Ft. Walton Bch., FL

 

1985

 

72

 

190,942

 

1,682,524

 

—

 

386,572

 

190,942

 

2,069,096

 

2,260,038

 

(563,684

)

1,696,354

 

—

 

Independence Village

 

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

1978

 

124

 

226,988

 

2,000,011

 

—

 

492,980

 

226,988

 

2,492,990

 

2,719,978

 

(695,021

)

2,024,957

 

—

 

Indian Lake I

 

Morrow, GA

 

1987

 

244

 

839,669

 

7,398,395

 

—

 

726,453

 

839,669

 

8,124,848

 

8,964,516

 

(1,960,604

)

7,003,913

 

—

 

Indian Ridge I (REIT)

 

Tallahassee, FL

 

1981

 

57

 

135,500

 

1,218,598

 

—

 

254,319

 

135,500

 

1,472,917

 

1,608,417

 

(309,933

)

1,298,484

 

—

 

Indian Ridge II (REIT)

 

Tallahassee, FL

 

1982

 

39

 

94,300

 

849,192

 

—

 

108,102

 

94,300

 

957,294

 

1,051,594

 

(190,262

)

861,332

 

—

 

Ketwood

 

Kettering, OH

 

1979

 

93

 

266,443

 

2,347,655

 

—

 

456,398

 

266,443

 

2,804,053

 

3,070,496

 

(746,798

)

2,323,697

 

—

 

Larkspur I (Hil)

 

Hilliard, OH

 

1983

 

60

 

179,628

 

1,582,519

 

—

 

426,640

 

179,628

 

2,009,159

 

2,188,787

 

(521,580

)

1,667,207

 

—

 

Laurel Bay

 

Ypsilanti, MI

 

1989

 

68

 

186,004

 

1,639,366

 

—

 

338,470

 

186,004

 

1,977,836

 

2,163,840

 

(489,915

)

1,673,925

 

—

 

Link Terrace

 

Hinesville, GA

 

1984

 

54

 

121,839

 

1,073,581

 

—

 

238,056

 

121,839

 

1,311,636

 

1,433,475

 

(337,480

)

1,095,994

 

—

 

Longwood (KY)

 

Lexington, KY

 

1985

 

60

 

146,309

 

1,289,042

 

—

 

274,228

 

146,309

 

1,563,270

 

1,709,579

 

(428,824

)

1,280,755

 

—

 

Marabou Mills II

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1987

 

63

 

192,186

 

1,693,220

 

—

 

142,341

 

192,186

 

1,835,561

 

2,027,747

 

(460,264

)

1,567,483

 

—

 

Marsh Landing I

 

Brunswick, GA

 

1984

 

57

 

133,193

 

1,173,573

 

—

 

349,397

 

133,193

 

1,522,970

 

1,656,163

 

(442,211

)

1,213,951

 

—

 

Marshlanding II

 

Brunswick, GA

 

1986

 

48

 

111,187

 

979,679

 

—

 

191,527

 

111,187

 

1,171,206

 

1,282,393

 

(316,186

)

966,207

 

—

 

Meadowland

 

Bogart, GA

 

1984

 

60

 

152,395

 

1,342,663

 

—

 

105,974

 

152,395

 

1,448,637

 

1,601,032

 

(363,315

)

1,237,717

 

—

 

Meadowood (Cuy)

 

Cuyahoga Falls, OH

 

1985

 

59

 

201,407

 

1,774,784

 

—

 

285,579

 

201,407

 

2,060,363

 

2,261,769

 

(509,381

)

1,752,388

 

—

 

Meadowood Apts. (Man)

 

Mansfield, OH

 

1983

 

50

 

118,504

 

1,044,002

 

—

 

210,588

 

118,504

 

1,254,590

 

1,373,094

 

(332,300

)

1,040,794

 

—

 

Meadowood I (GA)

 

Norcross, GA

 

1982

 

61

 

205,468

 

1,810,393

 

—

 

283,656

 

205,468

 

2,094,049

 

2,299,517

 

(542,428

)

1,757,089

 

—

 

Meadowood I (OH)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1984

 

60

 

146,912

 

1,294,458

 

—

 

447,956

 

146,912

 

1,742,414

 

1,889,326

 

(496,818

)

1,392,509

 

—

 

Meadowood II (GA)

 

Norcross, GA

 

1984

 

51

 

176,968

 

1,559,544

 

—

 

202,390

 

176,968

 

1,761,935

 

1,938,903

 

(445,940

)

1,492,963

 

—

 

Meadows I (OH), The

 

Columbus, OH

 

1985

 

60

 

150,800

 

1,328,616

 

—

 

300,644

 

150,800

 

1,629,260

 

1,780,060

 

(444,277

)

1,335,783

 

—

 

Millburn

 

Stow, OH

 

1984

 

52

 

192,062

 

1,692,276

 

—

 

303,652

 

192,062

 

1,995,928

 

2,187,990

 

(473,434

)

1,714,556

 

—

 

Millburn Court I

 

Centerville, OH

 

1979

 

65

 

260,000

 

1,246,757

 

—

 

205,002

 

260,000

 

1,451,758

 

1,711,758

 

(302,814

)

1,408,945

 

—

 

Montgomery Court II (OH)

 

Dublin, OH

 

1986

 

57

 

149,734

 

1,319,417

 

—

 

231,656

 

149,734

 

1,551,073

 

1,700,807

 

(412,577

)

1,288,230

 

—

 

Montrose Square

 

Columbus, OH

 

1987

 

129

 

193,266

 

1,703,260

 

—

 

546,836

 

193,266

 

2,250,096

 

2,443,362

 

(702,105

)

1,741,257

 

—

 

Morgan Trace

 

Union City, GA

 

1986

 

80

 

239,102

 

2,105,728

 

—

 

378,248

 

239,102

 

2,483,977

 

2,723,079

 

(626,881

)

2,096,198

 

—

 

Mosswood I

 

Winter Springs, FL

 

1981

 

58

 

163,294

 

1,438,796

 

—

 

424,762

 

163,294

 

1,863,557

 

2,026,851

 

(500,837

)

1,526,014

 

—

 

Newberry I

 

Lansing, MI

 

1985

 

62

 

183,509

 

1,616,913

 

—

 

336,055

 

183,509

 

1,952,968

 

2,136,477

 

(522,162

)

1,614,315

 

—

 

Newberry II

 

Lansing, MI

 

1986

 

48

 

142,292

 

1,253,951

 

—

 

223,778

 

142,292

 

1,477,729

 

1,620,021

 

(383,211

)

1,236,811

 

—

 

Northridge (GA)

 

Carrolton, GA

 

1985

 

77

 

238,811

 

2,104,181

 

—

 

322,392

 

238,811

 

2,426,573

 

2,665,383

 

(584,828

)

2,080,556

 

—

 

Northrup Court II

 

Coraopolis, PA

 

1985

 

49

 

157,190

 

1,385,018

 

—

 

175,730

 

157,190

 

1,560,748

 

1,717,938

 

(387,239

)

1,330,699

 

—

 

Nova Glen I

 

Daytona Beach, FL

 

1984

 

62

 

142,086

 

1,251,930

 

—

 

543,657

 

142,086

 

1,795,587

 

1,937,673

 

(545,526

)

1,392,146

 

—

 

Nova Glen II

 

Daytona Beach, FL

 

1986

 

81

 

175,168

 

1,543,420

 

—

 

451,938

 

175,168

 

1,995,358

 

2,170,526

 

(558,171

)

1,612,355

 

—

 

Novawood II

 

Daytona Beach, FL

 

1980

 

61

 

144,401

 

1,272,484

 

—

 

278,371

 

144,401

 

1,550,855

 

1,695,256

 

(394,168

)

1,301,088

 

—

 

Oak Gardens

 

Hollywood, FL

 

1988

 

105

 

329,968

 

2,907,288

 

—

 

363,603

 

329,968

 

3,270,891

 

3,600,858

 

(812,780

)

2,788,078

 

—

 

Oak Shade

 

Orange City, FL

 

1985

 

82

 

229,403

 

2,021,290

 

—

 

451,144

 

229,403

 

2,472,434

 

2,701,837

 

(615,277

)

2,086,560

 

—

 

Oakland Hills

 

Margate, FL

 

1987

 

189

 

3,040,000

 

4,930,604

 

—

 

698,374

 

3,040,000

 

5,628,978

 

8,668,978

 

(1,287,251

)

7,381,727

 

—

 

Oakwood Manor

 

Hollywood, FL

 

1986

 

63

 

173,247

 

1,525,973

 

—

 

131,129

 

173,247

 

1,657,102

 

1,830,349

 

(411,238

)

1,419,111

 

—

 

Oakwood Village (FL)

 

Hudson, FL

 

1986

 

75

 

145,547

 

1,282,427

 

—

 

555,131

 

145,547

 

1,837,558

 

1,983,105

 

(553,778

)

1,429,326

 

—

 

Oakwood Village (GA)

 

Augusta, GA

 

1985

 

70

 

161,174

 

1,420,119

 

—

 

221,082

 

161,174

 

1,641,201

 

1,802,375

 

(426,039

)

1,376,336

 

—

 

Olivewood (MI)

 

Sterling Hts., MI

 

1986

 

150

 

519,167

 

4,574,905

 

—

 

732,482

 

519,167

 

5,307,387

 

5,826,553

 

(1,357,574

)

4,468,979

 

—

 

Olivewood I

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1985

 

62

 

184,701

 

1,627,420

 

—

 

473,096

 

184,701

 

2,100,516

 

2,285,217

 

(603,147

)

1,682,070

 

—

 

Palm Place

 

Sarasota. FL

 

1984

 

80

 

248,315

 

2,188,339

 

—

 

513,658

 

248,315

 

2,701,997

 

2,950,312

 

(753,380

)

2,196,932

 

—

 

Palm Side II

 

Palm Bay, FL

 

(F)

 

—

 

1,458,837

 

59,901

 

—

 

—

 

1,458,837

 

59,901

 

1,518,738

 

—

 

1,518,738

 

—

 

Parkville (Col)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1978

 

100

 

150,433

 

1,325,756

 

—

 

455,842

 

150,433

 

1,781,599

 

1,932,032

 

(563,481

)

1,368,551

 

—

 

Parkville (Par)

 

Englewood, OH

 

1982

 

48

 

127,863

 

1,126,638

 

—

 

203,227

 

127,863

 

1,329,864

 

1,457,727

 

(345,083

)

1,112,644

 

—

 

Pine Barrens

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1986

 

104

 

268,303

 

2,364,041

 

—

 

695,105

 

268,303

 

3,059,146

 

3,327,449

 

(834,325

)

2,493,124

 

—

 

Pine Meadows I (FL)

 

Ft. Meyers, FL

 

1985

 

60

 

152,019

 

1,339,596

 

—

 

462,222

 

152,019

 

1,801,818

 

1,953,838

 

(567,649

)

1,386,189

 

—

 

Pinegrove II (REIT)

 

Roseville, MI

 

1984

 

33

 

99,074

 

891,743

 

—

 

25,474

 

99,074

 

917,217

 

1,016,291

 

(81,484

)

934,807

 

—

 

 

S-13



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

Pinellas Pines

 

Pinellas Park, FL

 

1983

 

68

 

174,999

 

1,541,934

 

—

 

318,855

 

174,999

 

1,860,789

 

2,035,788

 

(494,177

)

1,541,611

 

—

 

Plumwood I

 

Columbus, OH

 

1978

 

109

 

289,814

 

2,553,597

 

—

 

477,138

 

289,814

 

3,030,736

 

3,320,550

 

(809,559

)

2,510,991

 

—

 

Plumwood II

 

Columbus, OH

 

1983

 

34

 

107,583

 

947,924

 

—

 

127,616

 

107,583

 

1,075,540

 

1,183,124

 

(266,087

)

917,037

 

—

 

Ramblewood I (Val)

 

Valdosta, GA

 

1983

 

52

 

132,084

 

1,163,801

 

—

 

199,544

 

132,084

 

1,363,345

 

1,495,429

 

(356,568

)

1,138,861

 

—

 

Ramblewood II (Aug)

 

Augusta, GA

 

1986

 

102

 

169,269

 

1,490,783

 

—

 

383,210

 

169,269

 

1,873,992

 

2,043,262

 

(567,664

)

1,475,598

 

—

 

Ramblewood II (Val)

 

Valdosta, GA

 

1983

 

28

 

61,672

 

543,399

 

—

 

82,546

 

61,672

 

625,945

 

687,617

 

(156,454

)

531,163

 

—

 

Ranchside

 

New Port Richey, FL

 

1985

 

76

 

144,692

 

1,274,898

 

—

 

385,664

 

144,692

 

1,660,562

 

1,805,254

 

(446,461

)

1,358,793

 

—

 

Red Deer I

 

Fairborn, OH

 

1986

 

68

 

204,317

 

1,800,254

 

—

 

285,330

 

204,317

 

2,085,583

 

2,289,900

 

(533,007

)

1,756,893

 

—

 

Red Deer II

 

Fairborn, OH

 

1987

 

63

 

193,852

 

1,708,044

 

—

 

242,771

 

193,852

 

1,950,815

 

2,144,667

 

(487,228

)

1,657,439

 

—

 

Redan Village I

 

Decatur, GA

 

1984

 

78

 

274,294

 

2,416,963

 

—

 

320,607

 

274,294

 

2,737,570

 

3,011,865

 

(714,399

)

2,297,466

 

—

 

Redan Village II

 

Decatur, GA

 

1986

 

76

 

240,605

 

2,119,855

 

—

 

206,569

 

240,605

 

2,326,424

 

2,567,029

 

(564,539

)

2,002,490

 

—

 

Ridgewood (Lou)

 

Louisville, KY

 

1984

 

61

 

163,686

 

1,442,301

 

—

 

193,361

 

163,686

 

1,635,663

 

1,799,348

 

(402,751

)

1,396,598

 

—

 

Ridgewood I (Elk)

 

Elkhart, IN

 

1984

 

70

 

159,371

 

1,404,234

 

—

 

444,801

 

159,371

 

1,849,035

 

2,008,406

 

(506,182

)

1,502,223

 

—

 

Ridgewood I (GA)

 

Decatur, GA

 

1984

 

63

 

230,574

 

2,031,610

 

—

 

419,446

 

230,574

 

2,451,056

 

2,681,630

 

(611,829

)

2,069,801

 

—

 

Ridgewood I (Lex)

 

Lexington, KY

 

1984

 

62

 

203,720

 

1,794,792

 

—

 

259,372

 

203,720

 

2,054,165

 

2,257,884

 

(511,177

)

1,746,708

 

—

 

Ridgewood I (OH)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1984

 

60

 

174,066

 

1,534,135

 

—

 

319,586

 

174,066

 

1,853,721

 

2,027,787

 

(485,500

)

1,542,286

 

—

 

Ridgewood II (Elk)

 

Elkhart, IN

 

1986

 

99

 

215,335

 

1,897,333

 

—

 

383,263

 

215,335

 

2,280,596

 

2,495,931

 

(644,918

)

1,851,013

 

—

 

Ridgewood II (OH)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1985

 

58

 

162,914

 

1,435,648

 

—

 

229,692

 

162,914

 

1,665,340

 

1,828,254

 

(434,129

)

1,394,125

 

—

 

River Glen I

 

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

1987

 

60

 

171,272

 

1,508,892

 

—

 

188,865

 

171,272

 

1,697,757

 

1,869,029

 

(424,208

)

1,444,821

 

—

 

Rivers End II

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1986

 

69

 

190,688

 

1,680,171

 

—

 

423,011

 

190,688

 

2,103,182

 

2,293,870

 

(553,727

)

1,740,143

 

—

 

Rosewood (KY)

 

Louisville, KY

 

1984

 

77

 

253,453

 

2,233,196

 

—

 

295,201

 

253,453

 

2,528,398

 

2,781,851

 

(645,132

)

2,136,719

 

—

 

Rosewood (OH)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1985

 

90

 

212,378

 

1,871,186

 

—

 

508,772

 

212,378

 

2,379,958

 

2,592,337

 

(633,464

)

1,958,873

 

—

 

Rosewood Commons II

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1987

 

77

 

220,463

 

1,942,520

 

—

 

284,971

 

220,463

 

2,227,490

 

2,447,954

 

(588,412

)

1,859,542

 

—

 

Sandpiper II

 

Fort Pierce, FL

 

1982

 

66

 

155,496

 

1,369,987

 

—

 

394,724

 

155,496

 

1,764,711

 

1,920,207

 

(529,503

)

1,390,704

 

—

 

Shadetree

 

West Palm Beach, FL

 

1982

 

76

 

532,000

 

1,420,721

 

—

 

379,066

 

532,000

 

1,799,787

 

2,331,787

 

(441,879

)

1,889,908

 

—

 

Shadow Bay I

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1984

 

53

 

123,319

 

1,086,720

 

—

 

241,927

 

123,319

 

1,328,647

 

1,451,966

 

(359,849

)

1,092,116

 

—

 

Shadow Ridge

 

Tallahassee, FL

 

1983

 

62

 

150,327

 

1,324,061

 

—

 

315,769

 

150,327

 

1,639,831

 

1,790,157

 

(443,156

)

1,347,002

 

—

 

Shadow Trace

 

Stone Mountain, GA

 

1984

 

81

 

244,320

 

2,152,729

 

—

 

372,403

 

244,320

 

2,525,132

 

2,769,452

 

(645,600

)

2,123,852

 

—

 

Sherbrook (OH)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1985

 

60

 

163,493

 

1,440,036

 

—

 

353,937

 

163,493

 

1,793,972

 

1,957,466

 

(493,151

)

1,464,315

 

—

 

Sherbrook (PA)

 

Wexford, PA

 

1986

 

74

 

279,665

 

2,464,404

 

—

 

356,912

 

279,665

 

2,821,315

 

3,100,980

 

(709,163

)

2,391,818

 

—

 

Sky Ridge

 

Woodstock, GA

 

1987

 

120

 

437,373

 

3,853,792

 

—

 

454,652

 

437,373

 

4,308,444

 

4,745,818

 

(1,062,425

)

3,683,393

 

—

 

Slate Run (Hop)

 

Hopkinsville, KY

 

1984

 

57

 

91,304

 

804,535

 

—

 

307,931

 

91,304

 

1,112,466

 

1,203,770

 

(307,144

)

896,625

 

—

 

Slate Run I (Lou)

 

Louisville, KY

 

1984

 

65

 

179,766

 

1,583,931

 

—

 

305,115

 

179,766

 

1,889,046

 

2,068,811

 

(508,507

)

1,560,304

 

—

 

Spring Gate

 

Springfield, FL

 

1983

 

66

 

132,951

 

1,171,447

 

—

 

316,752

 

132,951

 

1,488,199

 

1,621,151

 

(478,178

)

1,142,973

 

—

 

Stewart Way III

 

Hinesville, GA

 

1986

 

59

 

100,500

 

1,530,464

 

—

 

101,115

 

100,500

 

1,631,579

 

1,732,079

 

(137,719

)

1,594,360

 

—

 

Stillwater

 

Savannah, GA

 

1983

 

53

 

151,198

 

1,332,417

 

—

 

239,198

 

151,198

 

1,571,615

 

1,722,813

 

(385,787

)

1,337,026

 

—

 

Stonehenge (Day)

 

Dayton, OH

 

1985

 

69

 

202,294

 

1,782,140

 

—

 

270,632

 

202,294

 

2,052,772

 

2,255,066

 

(540,743

)

1,714,323

 

—

 

Stonehenge (Mas)

 

Massillon, OH

 

1984

 

60

 

145,386

 

1,281,012

 

—

 

305,021

 

145,386

 

1,586,033

 

1,731,419

 

(442,706

)

1,288,713

 

—

 

Suffolk Grove I

 

Grove City, OH

 

1985

 

71

 

214,107

 

1,886,415

 

—

 

409,289

 

214,107

 

2,295,703

 

2,509,810

 

(600,516

)

1,909,295

 

—

 

Suffolk Grove II

 

Grove City, OH

 

1987

 

49

 

167,683

 

1,477,569

 

—

 

327,101

 

167,683

 

1,804,670

 

1,972,353

 

(464,725

)

1,507,628

 

—

 

Sunset Way I

 

Miami, FL

 

1987

 

100

 

258,568

 

2,278,539

 

—

 

551,166

 

258,568

 

2,829,705

 

3,088,273

 

(727,612

)

2,360,661

 

—

 

Sunset Way II

 

Miami, FL

 

1988

 

100

 

274,903

 

2,422,546

 

—

 

329,858

 

274,903

 

2,752,404

 

3,027,307

 

(706,918

)

2,320,389

 

—

 

Suntree

 

West Palm Beach, FL

 

1982

 

67

 

469,000

 

1,479,589

 

—

 

248,907

 

469,000

 

1,728,495

 

2,197,495

 

(339,620

)

1,857,876

 

—

 

Tabor Ridge

 

Berea, OH

 

1986

 

97

 

235,940

 

2,079,290

 

—

 

512,739

 

235,940

 

2,592,029

 

2,827,970

 

(710,620

)

2,117,350

 

—

 

Thymewood II

 

Miami, FL

 

1986

 

70

 

219,661

 

1,936,463

 

—

 

209,346

 

219,661

 

2,145,809

 

2,365,470

 

(527,232

)

1,838,239

 

—

 

Timberwood (GA)

 

Perry, GA

 

1985

 

60

 

144,299

 

1,271,305

 

—

 

244,009

 

144,299

 

1,515,314

 

1,659,614

 

(372,026

)

1,287,588

 

—

 

Turkscap I

 

Brandon, FL

 

1977

 

49

 

125,766

 

1,108,139

 

—

 

448,403

 

125,766

 

1,556,542

 

1,682,309

 

(495,595

)

1,186,714

 

—

 

University Square I

 

Tampa, FL

 

1979

 

81

 

197,457

 

1,739,807

 

—

 

390,323

 

197,457

 

2,130,130

 

2,327,586

 

(555,246

)

1,772,341

 

—

 

Valleyfield (PA)

 

Bridgeville, PA

 

1985

 

77

 

274,317

 

2,417,029

 

—

 

388,661

 

274,317

 

2,805,690

 

3,080,006

 

(722,071

)

2,357,936

 

—

 

Valleyfield II

 

Decatur, GA

 

1985

 

66

 

258,320

 

2,276,084

 

—

 

186,456

 

258,320

 

2,462,540

 

2,720,861

 

(593,241

)

2,127,619

 

—

 

Waterbury (GA)

 

Athens, GA

 

1985

 

53

 

147,450

 

1,299,195

 

—

 

111,319

 

147,450

 

1,410,514

 

1,557,964

 

(340,721

)

1,217,244

 

—

 

Waterbury (MI)

 

Westland, MI

 

1985

 

101

 

331,739

 

2,922,589

 

—

 

506,740

 

331,739

 

3,429,329

 

3,761,068

 

(874,877

)

2,886,191

 

—

 

Waterbury (OH)

 

Cincinnati, OH

 

1985

 

70

 

193,167

 

1,701,834

 

—

 

334,062

 

193,167

 

2,035,896

 

2,229,062

 

(563,622

)

1,665,441

 

—

 

Wentworth

 

Roseville, MI

 

1985

 

75

 

217,502

 

1,916,232

 

—

 

367,439

 

217,502

 

2,283,671

 

2,501,173

 

(606,858

)

1,894,316

 

—

 

Westway

 

Brunswick, GA

 

1984

 

70

 

168,323

 

1,483,106

 

—

 

424,898

 

168,323

 

1,908,004

 

2,076,326

 

(508,953

)

1,567,373

 

—

 

Whispering Pines

 

Fr. Pierce, FL

 

1986

 

64

 

384,000

 

621,367

 

—

 

264,280

 

384,000

 

885,647

 

1,269,647

 

(268,165

)

1,001,482

 

—

 

Whispering Pines II

 

Fr. Pierce, FL

 

1986

 

44

 

105,172

 

926,476

 

—

 

211,953

 

105,172

 

1,138,429

 

1,243,600

 

(302,641

)

940,959

 

—

 

Whisperwood

 

Cordele, GA

 

1985

 

50

 

84,240

 

742,374

 

—

 

285,160

 

84,240

 

1,027,534

 

1,111,774

 

(295,174

)

816,601

 

—

 

Willow Creek I (GA)

 

Griffin, GA

 

1985

 

53

 

126,809

 

1,298,973

 

—

 

302,489

 

126,809

 

1,601,463

 

1,728,272

 

(385,594

)

1,342,677

 

—

 

Willowood East II

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1985

 

60

 

104,918

 

924,590

 

—

 

225,964

 

104,918

 

1,150,554

 

1,255,471

 

(344,420

)

911,051

 

—

 

Willowood I (Woo)

 

Wooster, OH

 

1984

 

51

 

117,254

 

1,033,137

 

—

 

237,115

 

117,254

 

1,270,252

 

1,387,506

 

(329,846

)

1,057,660

 

—

 

Willowood II (KY)

 

Frankfort, KY

 

1985

 

53

 

120,375

 

1,060,639

 

—

 

153,296

 

120,375

 

1,213,935

 

1,334,310

 

(308,720

)

1,025,590

 

—

 

Willows I (OH), The

 

Columbus, OH

 

1987

 

50

 

76,283

 

672,340

 

—

 

228,775

 

76,283

 

901,115

 

977,398

 

(247,241

)

730,157

 

—

 

Willows II (OH), The

 

Columbus, OH

 

1981

 

41

 

96,679

 

851,845

 

—

 

130,804

 

96,679

 

982,649

 

1,079,328

 

(256,394

)

822,934

 

—

 

Windwood I (FL)

 

Palm Bay, FL

 

1988

 

64

 

113,913

 

1,003,498

 

—

 

318,838

 

113,913

 

1,322,337

 

1,436,249

 

(386,318

)

1,049,931

 

—

 

Winter Woods I (FL)

 

Winter Garden, FL

 

1985

 

57

 

144,921

 

1,276,965

 

—

 

505,063

 

144,921

 

1,782,028

 

1,926,949

 

(511,357

)

1,415,592

 

—

 

Woodbine (Cuy)

 

Cuyahoga Falls, OH

 

1982

 

55

 

185,868

 

1,637,701

 

—

 

190,662

 

185,868

 

1,828,363

 

2,014,231

 

(442,941

)

1,571,290

 

—

 

Woodcliff I

 

Lilburn, GA

 

1984

 

71

 

276,659

 

2,437,667

 

—

 

359,883

 

276,659

 

2,797,551

 

3,074,210

 

(720,281

)

2,353,929

 

—

 

Woodcrest I

 

Warner Robins, GA

 

1984

 

66

 

115,739

 

1,028,353

 

—

 

329,685

 

115,739

 

1,358,038

 

1,473,777

 

(322,896

)

1,150,881

 

—

 

Woodlands I (Str)

 

Streetsboro, OH

 

1984

 

60

 

197,378

 

1,739,112

 

—

 

373,907

 

197,378

 

2,113,018

 

2,310,396

 

(542,413

)

1,767,983

 

—

 

Woodlands II (PA)

 

Zelienople, PA

 

1987

 

62

 

192,972

 

1,700,297

 

—

 

179,879

 

192,972

 

1,880,175

 

2,073,148

 

(452,496

)

1,620,652

 

—

 

 

S-14



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

Woodlands III (Col)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1987

 

93

 

230,536

 

2,031,249

 

—

 

569,633

 

230,536

 

2,600,881

 

2,831,417

 

(692,169

)

2,139,248

 

—

 

Woodtrail

 

Newnan, GA

 

1984

 

61

 

250,895

 

2,210,658

 

—

 

287,964

 

250,895

 

2,498,622

 

2,749,517

 

(607,691

)

2,141,826

 

—

 

Lexford Wholly Owned Unencumbered

 

 

 

 

 

13,970

 

45,546,010

 

331,297,547

 

—

 

63,379,282

 

45,546,010

 

394,676,830

 

440,222,839

 

(101,050,199

)

339,172,640

 

—

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lexford Wholly Owned Encumbered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acadia Court

 

Bloomington, IN

 

1985

 

96

 

257,484

 

2,268,653

 

—

 

516,038

 

257,484

 

2,784,691

 

3,042,175

 

(807,911

)

2,234,263

 

1,879,577

 

Amberwood (OH)

 

Massillon, OH

 

1987

 

63

 

126,227

 

1,112,289

 

—

 

310,983

 

126,227

 

1,423,272

 

1,549,499

 

(392,062

)

1,157,437

 

814,206

 

Amesbury I

 

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

1986

 

68

 

143,039

 

1,260,233

 

—

 

306,196

 

143,039

 

1,566,429

 

1,709,469

 

(428,104

)

1,281,365

 

1,194,940

 

Annhurst (IN)

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1985

 

83

 

189,235

 

1,667,469

 

—

 

427,629

 

189,235

 

2,095,098

 

2,284,333

 

(582,685

)

1,701,648

 

1,159,432

 

Apple Ridge I

 

Circleville, OH

 

1987

 

59

 

139,300

 

1,227,582

 

—

 

357,723

 

139,300

 

1,585,305

 

1,724,605

 

(420,606

)

1,303,999

 

1,008,377

 

Applegate I (IN)

 

Muncie, IN

 

1984

 

53

 

138,506

 

1,220,386

 

—

 

283,020

 

138,506

 

1,503,406

 

1,641,911

 

(406,308

)

1,235,603

 

845,933

 

Applegate II (IN)

 

Muncie, IN

 

1987

 

80

 

180,017

 

1,586,143

 

—

 

308,187

 

180,017

 

1,894,330

 

2,074,346

 

(500,159

)

1,574,187

 

1,202,296

 

Applewood I

 

Deland, FL

 

1982

 

161

 

235,230

 

2,072,994

 

—

 

947,984

 

235,230

 

3,020,978

 

3,256,209

 

(926,817

)

2,329,391

 

1,970,095

 

Ashford Hill

 

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

1986

 

77

 

184,985

 

1,630,021

 

—

 

333,816

 

184,985

 

1,963,837

 

2,148,822

 

(550,801

)

1,598,021

 

1,283,887

 

Ashgrove (OH)

 

Franklin, OH

 

1983

 

63

 

157,535

 

1,387,687

 

—

 

261,877

 

157,535

 

1,649,564

 

1,807,099

 

(443,113

)

1,363,985

 

1,150,554

 

Ashgrove I (MI)

 

Sterling Hts, MI

 

1985

 

114

 

403,580

 

3,555,988

 

—

 

703,352

 

403,580

 

4,259,340

 

4,662,920

 

(1,052,394

)

3,610,525

 

2,949,818

 

Ashgrove II (MI)

 

Sterling Hts, MI

 

1987

 

90

 

311,912

 

2,748,287

 

—

 

273,772

 

311,912

 

3,022,059

 

3,333,972

 

(734,882

)

2,599,090

 

2,097,955

 

Astorwood (REIT)

 

Stuart, FL

 

1983

 

75

 

233,150

 

2,098,338

 

—

 

338,189

 

233,150

 

2,436,527

 

2,669,677

 

(504,712

)

2,164,965

 

1,504,177

 

Barrington

 

Clarkston, GA

 

1984

 

47

 

144,459

 

1,272,842

 

—

 

266,796

 

144,459

 

1,539,638

 

1,684,097

 

(403,709

)

1,280,388

 

931,597

 

Beckford Place (IN)

 

New Castle, IN

 

1984

 

41

 

99,046

 

872,702

 

—

 

217,449

 

99,046

 

1,090,151

 

1,189,197

 

(283,839

)

905,358

 

654,733

 

Cambridge Commons II

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1987

 

75

 

141,845

 

1,249,511

 

—

 

426,765

 

141,845

 

1,676,276

 

1,818,121

 

(512,399

)

1,305,723

 

786,672

 

Camellia Court I (Day)

 

Dayton, OH

 

1981

 

57

 

131,858

 

1,162,066

 

—

 

327,246

 

131,858

 

1,489,311

 

1,621,170

 

(420,844

)

1,200,325

 

1,002,362

 

Camellia Court II (Col)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1984

 

40

 

118,421

 

1,043,417

 

—

 

302,592

 

118,421

 

1,346,009

 

1,464,430

 

(364,437

)

1,099,993

 

864,506

 

Candlelight I

 

Brooksville, FL

 

1982

 

51

 

105,000

 

925,167

 

—

 

344,604

 

105,000

 

1,269,770

 

1,374,771

 

(331,704

)

1,043,067

 

552,432

 

Candlelight II

 

Brooksville, FL

 

1985

 

60

 

95,061

 

837,593

 

—

 

356,659

 

95,061

 

1,194,252

 

1,289,314

 

(336,305

)

953,009

 

543,222

 

Cedar Hill

 

Knoxville, TN

 

1986

 

74

 

204,792

 

1,804,444

 

—

 

216,237

 

204,792

 

2,020,681

 

2,225,473

 

(523,667

)

1,701,806

 

1,413,125

 

Cedargate (MI)

 

Michigan City, IN

 

1983

 

53

 

120,378

 

1,060,663

 

—

 

153,220

 

120,378

 

1,213,883

 

1,334,261

 

(310,416

)

1,023,845

 

729,846

 

Cedargate (She)

 

Shelbyville, KY

 

1984

 

58

 

158,685

 

1,398,041

 

—

 

283,738

 

158,685

 

1,681,779

 

1,840,464

 

(437,957

)

1,402,508

 

1,067,549

 

Cedargate I (Cla)

 

Clayton, OH

 

1984

 

61

 

159,599

 

1,406,493

 

—

 

312,333

 

159,599

 

1,718,825

 

1,878,425

 

(450,002

)

1,428,423

 

1,127,950

 

Cedargate I (OH)

 

Lancaster, OH

 

1982

 

110

 

240,587

 

2,119,432

 

—

 

590,560

 

240,587

 

2,709,992

 

2,950,579

 

(721,492

)

2,229,087

 

2,135,372

 

Cedarwood I (FL)

 

Ocala, FL

 

1978

 

55

 

119,470

 

1,052,657

 

—

 

342,727

 

119,470

 

1,395,384

 

1,514,854

 

(376,491

)

1,138,362

 

104,000

 

Cedarwood I (IN)

 

Goshen, IN

 

1983/84

 

90

 

251,745

 

2,218,126

 

—

 

399,726

 

251,745

 

2,617,852

 

2,869,597

 

(706,634

)

2,162,963

 

1,737,870

 

Cedarwood II (KY)

 

Lexington, KY

 

1986

 

48

 

106,724

 

940,357

 

—

 

281,488

 

106,724

 

1,221,844

 

1,328,568

 

(343,590

)

984,978

 

969,000

 

Cherry Glen I

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1986/87

 

138

 

335,596

 

2,957,360

 

—

 

445,517

 

335,596

 

3,402,877

 

3,738,472

 

(939,341

)

2,799,131

 

2,851,888

 

Clearview I

 

Greenwood, IN

 

1986

 

70

 

182,206

 

1,605,429

 

—

 

283,626

 

182,206

 

1,889,056

 

2,071,261

 

(519,622

)

1,551,639

 

12,735

 

Clearwater

 

Eastlake, OH

 

1986

 

42

 

128,303

 

1,130,691

 

—

 

189,265

 

128,303

 

1,319,956

 

1,448,259

 

(333,142

)

1,115,117

 

1,008,377

 

Cypress

 

Panama City, FL

 

1985

 

70

 

171,882

 

1,514,636

 

—

 

436,239

 

171,882

 

1,950,874

 

2,122,757

 

(526,910

)

1,595,847

 

1,276,666

 

Daniel Court

 

Cincinnati, OH

 

1985

 

114

 

334,101

 

2,943,516

 

—

 

641,012

 

334,101

 

3,584,529

 

3,918,629

 

(1,038,051

)

2,880,579

 

2,117,353

 

Deerwood (FL)

 

Eustis, FL

 

1982

 

50

 

114,948

 

1,012,819

 

—

 

203,384

 

114,948

 

1,216,202

 

1,331,151

 

(345,151

)

986,000

 

785,384

 

Dogwood Glen I

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1986

 

83

 

240,855

 

2,122,193

 

—

 

416,677

 

240,855

 

2,538,870

 

2,779,725

 

(650,983

)

2,128,743

 

1,702,607

 

Dogwood Glen II

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1987

 

77

 

202,397

 

1,783,336

 

—

 

276,643

 

202,397

 

2,059,979

 

2,262,376

 

(539,991

)

1,722,385

 

1,199,056

 

Dover Place II

 

Eastlake, OH

 

1983

 

63

 

230,895

 

2,034,242

 

—

 

235,585

 

230,895

 

2,269,827

 

2,500,722

 

(543,404

)

1,957,319

 

1,484,811

 

Dover Place III

 

Eastlake, OH

 

1983

 

30

 

119,835

 

1,055,878

 

—

 

89,557

 

119,835

 

1,145,435

 

1,265,270

 

(262,933

)

1,002,338

 

703,572

 

Dover Place IV

 

Eastlake, OH

 

1986

 

72

 

261,912

 

2,307,730

 

—

 

239,739

 

261,912

 

2,547,469

 

2,809,381

 

(592,963

)

2,216,418

 

1,708,675

 

Driftwood

 

Atlantic Beach, FL

 

1985

 

63

 

126,357

 

1,113,430

 

—

 

350,002

 

126,357

 

1,463,433

 

1,589,790

 

(417,935

)

1,171,855

 

346,206

 

Elmtree Park I

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1986

 

72

 

157,687

 

1,389,621

 

—

 

293,237

 

157,687

 

1,682,858

 

1,840,545

 

(487,532

)

1,353,013

 

1,336,823

 

Elmtree Park II

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1987

 

53

 

114,114

 

1,005,455

 

—

 

206,518

 

114,114

 

1,211,973

 

1,326,087

 

(349,836

)

976,252

 

840,574

 

Elmwood I (FL)

 

W. Palm Beach, FL

 

1984

 

52

 

163,389

 

1,439,632

 

—

 

175,653

 

163,389

 

1,615,286

 

1,778,674

 

(411,867

)

1,366,807

 

316,202

 

Elmwood II (FL)

 

W. Palm Beach, FL

 

1984

 

50

 

179,743

 

1,582,960

 

—

 

163,324

 

179,743

 

1,746,284

 

1,926,028

 

(430,204

)

1,495,823

 

1,203,134

 

Forsythia Court (KY)

 

Louisville, KY

 

1985

 

98

 

279,450

 

2,462,187

 

—

 

404,109

 

279,450

 

2,866,296

 

3,145,746

 

(752,969

)

2,392,777

 

1,730,489

 

Forsythia Court (MD)

 

Abingdon, MD

 

1986

 

76

 

251,955

 

2,220,100

 

—

 

490,543

 

251,955

 

2,710,643

 

2,962,598

 

(715,665

)

2,246,933

 

1,907,418

 

Glen Arm Manor

 

Albany, GA

 

1986

 

70

 

166,498

 

1,466,883

 

—

 

306,630

 

166,498

 

1,773,513

 

1,940,012

 

(467,470

)

1,472,542

 

1,033,113

 

Glenwood Village

 

Macon, GA

 

1986

 

80

 

167,779

 

1,478,614

 

—

 

390,951

 

167,779

 

1,869,565

 

2,037,344

 

(469,709

)

1,567,635

 

985,047

 

Greenbriar Glen

 

Atlanta, GA

 

1988

 

74

 

227,701

 

2,006,246

 

—

 

349,017

 

227,701

 

2,355,263

 

2,582,964

 

(556,809

)

2,026,156

 

1,352,918

 

Greentree I (GA) (REIT)

 

Thomasville, GA

 

1983

 

43

 

84,750

 

762,659

 

—

 

251,737

 

84,750

 

1,014,396

 

1,099,146

 

(207,027

)

892,119

 

611,925

 

Greentree II (GA) (REIT)

 

Thomasville, GA

 

1984

 

32

 

81,000

 

729,283

 

—

 

119,996

 

81,000

 

849,279

 

930,279

 

(173,808

)

756,471

 

460,453

 

Hampshire II

 

Elyria, OH

 

1981

 

56

 

126,231

 

1,112,036

 

—

 

250,012

 

126,231

 

1,362,048

 

1,488,280

 

(339,034

)

1,149,246

 

782,048

 

Harvest Grove I

 

Gahanna, OH

 

1986

 

73

 

170,334

 

1,500,232

 

—

 

344,078

 

170,334

 

1,844,310

 

2,014,644

 

(497,936

)

1,516,708

 

1,470,505

 

Hatcherway

 

Waycross, GA

 

1986

 

64

 

96,885

 

853,716

 

—

 

316,788

 

96,885

 

1,170,504

 

1,267,389

 

(338,550

)

928,840

 

669,122

 

Hayfield Park

 

Burlington, KY

 

1986

 

86

 

261,457

 

2,303,394

 

—

 

282,810

 

261,457

 

2,586,205

 

2,847,662

 

(638,974

)

2,208,687

 

1,534,250

 

Heathmoore (Eva)

 

Evansville, IN

 

1984

 

73

 

162,375

 

1,430,747

 

—

 

363,595

 

162,375

 

1,794,342

 

1,956,716

 

(466,887

)

1,489,830

 

1,010,107

 

Heathmoore (MI)

 

Clinton Twp., MI

 

1983

 

72

 

227,105

 

2,001,243

 

—

 

352,819

 

227,105

 

2,354,061

 

2,581,166

 

(596,592

)

1,984,574

 

1,549,453

 

Heathmoore I (IN)

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1983

 

55

 

144,557

 

1,273,702

 

—

 

281,472

 

144,557

 

1,555,174

 

1,699,731

 

(435,676

)

1,264,055

 

1,124,246

 

Heathmoore I (MI)

 

Canton, MI

 

1986

 

60

 

232,064

 

2,044,227

 

—

 

431,076

 

232,064

 

2,475,303

 

2,707,367

 

(604,192

)

2,103,175

 

1,521,755

 

Heron Pointe (Atl)

 

Atlantic Beach, FL

 

1986

 

99

 

214,332

 

1,888,814

 

—

 

410,134

 

214,332

 

2,298,948

 

2,513,280

 

(657,850

)

1,855,431

 

1,566,550

 

Heronwood (REIT)

 

Ft. Myers, FL

 

1982

 

59

 

146,100

 

1,315,211

 

—

 

267,337

 

146,100

 

1,582,548

 

1,728,648

 

(313,636

)

1,415,012

 

1,130,586

 

Hickory Place

 

Gainesville, FL

 

1983

 

70

 

192,453

 

1,695,454

 

—

 

316,542

 

192,453

 

2,011,996

 

2,204,450

 

(554,700

)

1,649,750

 

1,222,366

 

Hidden Acres

 

Sarasota, FL

 

1987

 

94

 

253,139

 

2,230,579

 

—

 

443,859

 

253,139

 

2,674,438

 

2,927,577

 

(683,984

)

2,243,592

 

1,601,965

 

Hidden Pines

 

Casselberry, FL

 

1981

 

56

 

176,308

 

1,553,565

 

—

 

472,611

 

176,308

 

2,026,177

 

2,202,485

 

(574,680

)

1,627,805

 

19,562

 

Hillcrest Villas

 

Crestview, FL

 

1985

 

65

 

141,603

 

1,247,677

 

—

 

222,457

 

141,603

 

1,470,135

 

1,611,738

 

(397,022

)

1,214,715

 

895,169

 

Holly Sands II

 

Ft. Walton Bch., FL

 

1986

 

52

 

124,578

 

1,098,074

 

—

 

200,458

 

124,578

 

1,298,532

 

1,423,109

 

(357,698

)

1,065,412

 

1,009,375

 

 

S-15



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Iris Glen

 

Conyers, GA

 

1984

 

79

 

270,458

 

2,383,030

 

—

 

295,085

 

270,458

 

2,678,115

 

2,948,573

 

(645,302

)

2,303,271

 

1,629,821

 

Jefferson Way I

 

Orange Park, FL

 

1987

 

56

 

147,799

 

1,302,268

 

—

 

343,047

 

147,799

 

1,645,315

 

1,793,114

 

(444,316

)

1,348,798

 

1,000,621

 

Jupiter Cove I

 

Jupiter, FL

 

1987

 

63

 

233,932

 

2,060,900

 

—

 

462,033

 

233,932

 

2,522,932

 

2,756,865

 

(694,807

)

2,062,058

 

1,470,505

 

Jupiter Cove II

 

Jupiter, FL

 

1987

 

61

 

1,220,000

 

483,833

 

—

 

262,589

 

1,220,000

 

746,422

 

1,966,422

 

(225,200

)

1,741,222

 

1,458,905

 

Jupiter Cove III

 

Jupiter, FL

 

1987

 

63

 

242,010

 

2,131,722

 

—

 

258,266

 

242,010

 

2,389,988

 

2,631,998

 

(586,388

)

2,045,610

 

1,547,372

 

Kings Colony

 

Savannah, GA

 

1987

 

89

 

230,149

 

2,027,865

 

—

 

324,550

 

230,149

 

2,352,415

 

2,582,564

 

(620,517

)

1,962,047

 

1,871,551

 

Lakeshore I (GA)

 

Ft. Oglethorpe, GA

 

1986

 

79

 

169,375

 

1,492,378

 

—

 

372,693

 

169,375

 

1,865,071

 

2,034,446

 

(544,691

)

1,489,755

 

1,202,296

 

Laurel Glen

 

Acworth, GA

 

1986

 

81

 

289,509

 

2,550,891

 

—

 

282,970

 

289,509

 

2,833,860

 

3,123,370

 

(679,189

)

2,444,181

 

1,655,375

 

Lexford Apartment Homes

 

Miami, FL

 

1987

 

72

 

191,986

 

1,691,254

 

—

 

266,839

 

191,986

 

1,958,093

 

2,150,078

 

(473,699

)

1,676,379

 

1,251,771

 

Lindendale

 

Columbus, OH

 

1987

 

77

 

209,159

 

1,842,816

 

—

 

408,714

 

209,159

 

2,251,529

 

2,460,688

 

(589,473

)

1,871,214

 

1,211,266

 

Manchester (REIT)

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1985

 

78

 

184,100

 

1,657,194

 

—

 

307,914

 

184,100

 

1,965,107

 

2,149,207

 

(410,884

)

1,738,323

 

1,179,886

 

Marabou Mills I

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1986

 

86

 

224,178

 

1,974,952

 

—

 

295,228

 

224,178

 

2,270,181

 

2,494,359

 

(612,519

)

1,881,840

 

1,242,317

 

Marabou Mills III

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1987

 

59

 

171,557

 

1,511,602

 

—

 

126,544

 

171,557

 

1,638,146

 

1,809,703

 

(404,951

)

1,404,752

 

1,140,520

 

Meadowood (Fra)

 

Franklin, IN

 

1983

 

51

 

129,252

 

1,138,733

 

—

 

247,552

 

129,252

 

1,386,285

 

1,515,536

 

(387,461

)

1,128,075

 

898,492

 

Meadowood (New)

 

Newburgh, IN

 

1984

 

65

 

131,546

 

1,159,064

 

—

 

234,091

 

131,546

 

1,393,155

 

1,524,701

 

(361,711

)

1,162,990

 

881,219

 

Meadowood (Nic)

 

Nicholasville, KY

 

1983

 

67

 

173,223

 

1,526,283

 

—

 

355,942

 

173,223

 

1,882,225

 

2,055,448

 

(504,567

)

1,550,881

 

1,281,506

 

Meadowood (Tem)

 

Temperance, MI

 

1984

 

57

 

173,675

 

1,530,262

 

—

 

209,115

 

173,675

 

1,739,377

 

1,913,052

 

(422,248

)

1,490,804

 

1,228,864

 

Meadowood II (OH)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1985

 

23

 

57,802

 

509,199

 

—

 

151,145

 

57,802

 

660,344

 

718,146

 

(183,131

)

535,015

 

442,777

 

Meadows II (OH), The

 

Columbus, OH

 

1987

 

60

 

186,636

 

1,644,521

 

—

 

278,054

 

186,636

 

1,922,574

 

2,109,211

 

(499,994

)

1,609,216

 

1,111,775

 

Meldon Place

 

Toledo, OH

 

1978

 

127

 

288,434

 

2,541,701

 

—

 

686,938

 

288,434

 

3,228,639

 

3,517,073

 

(987,757

)

2,529,316

 

2,155,627

 

Merrifield

 

Salisbury, MD

 

1988

 

95

 

268,712

 

2,367,645

 

—

 

392,843

 

268,712

 

2,760,487

 

3,029,199

 

(685,525

)

2,343,674

 

1,799,885

 

Miguel Place

 

Port Richey, FL

 

1987

 

91

 

199,349

 

1,756,482

 

—

 

532,901

 

199,349

 

2,289,383

 

2,488,732

 

(647,451

)

1,841,281

 

1,403,066

 

Millburn Court II

 

Centerville, OH

 

1981

 

51

 

122,870

 

1,082,698

 

—

 

342,970

 

122,870

 

1,425,667

 

1,548,538

 

(434,175

)

1,114,363

 

831,128

 

Montgomery Court I (MI)

 

Haslett, MI

 

1984

 

59

 

156,298

 

1,377,153

 

—

 

387,594

 

156,298

 

1,764,747

 

1,921,045

 

(484,777

)

1,436,268

 

1,089,764

 

Montgomery Court I (OH)

 

Dublin, OH

 

1985

 

60

 

163,755

 

1,442,643

 

—

 

442,930

 

163,755

 

1,885,573

 

2,049,328

 

(531,192

)

1,518,136

 

1,171,389

 

Mosswood II

 

Winter Springs, FL

 

1982

 

89

 

275,330

 

2,426,158

 

—

 

563,310

 

275,330

 

2,989,467

 

3,264,797

 

(767,285

)

2,497,512

 

1,403,831

 

Northrup Court I

 

Coraopolis, PA

 

1985

 

60

 

189,246

 

1,667,463

 

—

 

303,451

 

189,246

 

1,970,914

 

2,160,160

 

(490,686

)

1,669,473

 

1,255,120

 

Novawood I

 

Daytona Beach, FL

 

1980

 

58

 

122,311

 

1,077,897

 

—

 

458,952

 

122,311

 

1,536,849

 

1,659,161

 

(421,759

)

1,237,402

 

149,213

 

Oak Ridge

 

Clermont, FL

 

1985

 

63

 

173,617

 

1,529,936

 

—

 

378,984

 

173,617

 

1,908,920

 

2,082,537

 

(550,646

)

1,531,891

 

1,112,062

 

Oakley Woods

 

Union City, GA

 

1984

 

60

 

165,449

 

1,457,485

 

—

 

366,002

 

165,449

 

1,823,487

 

1,988,936

 

(508,815

)

1,480,121

 

1,016,107

 

Old Archer Court

 

Gainesville, FL

 

1977

 

72

 

170,323

 

1,500,735

 

—

 

405,646

 

170,323

 

1,906,381

 

2,076,705

 

(564,619

)

1,512,086

 

877,148

 

Olivewood II

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1986

 

67

 

186,235

 

1,640,571

 

—

 

284,498

 

186,235

 

1,925,068

 

2,111,303

 

(519,918

)

1,591,385

 

1,179,680

 

Parkville (IN)

 

Gas City, IN

 

1982

 

49

 

103,434

 

911,494

 

—

 

205,083

 

103,434

 

1,116,577

 

1,220,011

 

(321,980

)

898,031

 

681,757

 

Parkway North (REIT)

 

Ft. Meyers, FL

 

1984

 

56

 

145,350

 

1,308,115

 

—

 

310,705

 

145,350

 

1,618,820

 

1,764,170

 

(346,649

)

1,417,521

 

1,027,644

 

Pine Knoll

 

Jonesboro, GA

 

1985

 

46

 

138,052

 

1,216,391

 

—

 

210,519

 

138,052

 

1,426,910

 

1,564,962

 

(355,808

)

1,209,155

 

1,096,194

 

Pine Terrace I

 

Callaway, FL

 

1983

 

148

 

288,992

 

2,546,426

 

—

 

884,470

 

288,992

 

3,430,896

 

3,719,888

 

(1,039,983

)

2,679,905

 

1,946,135

 

Pinegrove I (REIT)

 

Roseville, MI

 

1983

 

50

 

145,660

 

1,311,019

 

—

 

83,094

 

145,660

 

1,394,113

 

1,539,773

 

(128,732

)

1,411,041

 

1,028,339

 

Princeton Court

 

Evansville, IN

 

1985

 

62

 

116,696

 

1,028,219

 

—

 

288,467

 

116,696

 

1,316,686

 

1,433,382

 

(373,366

)

1,060,016

 

813,773

 

Quail Call

 

Albany, GA

 

1984

 

55

 

104,723

 

922,728

 

—

 

288,572

 

104,723

 

1,211,299

 

1,316,023

 

(343,932

)

972,091

 

643,387

 

Ridgewood (MI)

 

Westland, MI

 

1983

 

56

 

176,969

 

1,559,588

 

—

 

331,610

 

176,969

 

1,891,199

 

2,068,168

 

(507,644

)

1,560,524

 

1,100,475

 

Ridgewood I (Bed)

 

Bedford, IN

 

1984

 

48

 

107,120

 

943,843

 

—

 

213,006

 

107,120

 

1,156,850

 

1,263,970

 

(320,480

)

943,489

 

777,708

 

Ridgewood II (Bed)

 

Bedford, IN

 

1986

 

50

 

99,559

 

877,221

 

—

 

153,286

 

99,559

 

1,030,507

 

1,130,065

 

(273,611

)

856,454

 

805,146

 

Ridgewood II (GA)

 

Decatur, GA

 

1986

 

52

 

164,999

 

1,453,626

 

—

 

212,397

 

164,999

 

1,666,023

 

1,831,022

 

(406,236

)

1,424,786

 

884,612

 

River Glen II

 

Reynoldsburg, OH

 

1987

 

53

 

158,684

 

1,398,175

 

—

 

253,212

 

158,684

 

1,651,387

 

1,810,070

 

(417,523

)

1,392,547

 

1,096,621

 

Rivers End I

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1986

 

66

 

171,745

 

1,507,065

 

—

 

528,187

 

171,745

 

2,035,252

 

2,206,996

 

(546,958

)

1,660,038

 

1,263,297

 

Roanoke

 

Rochester Hills, MI

 

1985

 

88

 

369,911

 

3,259,270

 

—

 

479,686

 

369,911

 

3,738,956

 

4,108,868

 

(876,781

)

3,232,086

 

40,500

 

Rosewood Commons I

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1986

 

96

 

228,644

 

2,014,652

 

—

 

345,749

 

228,644

 

2,360,401

 

2,589,046

 

(650,171

)

1,938,875

 

1,674,580

 

Sandalwood

 

Toledo, OH

 

1984

 

50

 

151,926

 

1,338,636

 

—

 

256,478

 

151,926

 

1,595,114

 

1,747,040

 

(386,161

)

1,360,879

 

1,007,225

 

Sanford Court

 

Sanford, FL

 

1976

 

106

 

238,814

 

2,104,212

 

—

 

636,762

 

238,814

 

2,740,975

 

2,979,789

 

(752,966

)

2,226,823

 

1,581,401

 

Shadow Bay II

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1985

 

59

 

139,709

 

1,231,134

 

—

 

179,318

 

139,709

 

1,410,452

 

1,550,161

 

(389,565

)

1,160,596

 

905,457

 

Shadowood I

 

Sarasota, FL

 

1982

 

69

 

157,661

 

1,389,061

 

—

 

408,400

 

157,661

 

1,797,461

 

1,955,122

 

(495,238

)

1,459,884

 

600,000

 

Shadowood II

 

Sarasota, FL

 

1983

 

70

 

152,031

 

1,339,469

 

—

 

270,844

 

152,031

 

1,610,313

 

1,762,344

 

(428,516

)

1,333,828

 

1,095,977

 

Sherbrook (IN)

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1986

 

76

 

171,920

 

1,514,707

 

—

 

230,658

 

171,920

 

1,745,365

 

1,917,285

 

(481,444

)

1,435,841

 

1,502,811

 

Silver Forest

 

Ocala, FL

 

1985

 

51

 

126,536

 

1,114,917

 

—

 

229,368

 

126,536

 

1,344,285

 

1,470,821

 

(330,061

)

1,140,760

 

783,381

 

Slate Run (Ind)

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1984

 

90

 

295,593

 

2,604,497

 

—

 

500,091

 

295,593

 

3,104,588

 

3,400,181

 

(827,813

)

2,572,368

 

1,855,125

 

Slate Run (Leb)

 

Lebanon, IN

 

1984

 

61

 

154,061

 

1,357,445

 

—

 

380,751

 

154,061

 

1,738,196

 

1,892,257

 

(457,767

)

1,434,490

 

1,125,353

 

Slate Run (Mia)

 

Miamisburg, OH

 

1985

 

48

 

136,065

 

1,198,879

 

—

 

243,246

 

136,065

 

1,442,125

 

1,578,190

 

(367,987

)

1,210,202

 

757,220

 

Slate Run II (Lou)

 

Louisville, KY

 

1985

 

63

 

167,723

 

1,477,722

 

—

 

210,005

 

167,723

 

1,687,727

 

1,855,450

 

(420,849

)

1,434,602

 

1,066,533

 

Spicewood

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1986

 

50

 

128,355

 

1,131,044

 

—

 

143,021

 

128,355

 

1,274,064

 

1,402,419

 

(331,824

)

1,070,595

 

984,566

 

Springbrook

 

Anderson, SC

 

1986

 

92

 

150,209

 

1,488,611

 

—

 

345,157

 

150,209

 

1,833,768

 

1,983,977

 

(494,856

)

1,489,121

 

1,575,700

 

Springwood (Col)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1983

 

64

 

189,948

 

1,672,889

 

—

 

350,295

 

189,948

 

2,023,184

 

2,213,131

 

(536,102

)

1,677,030

 

972,623

 

Stewart Way I

 

Hinesville, GA

 

1986

 

132

 

290,773

 

2,562,373

 

—

 

640,353

 

290,773

 

3,202,726

 

3,493,499

 

(823,268

)

2,670,231

 

1,974,533

 

Stonehenge (Ind)

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1984

 

60

 

146,810

 

1,293,559

 

—

 

327,377

 

146,810

 

1,620,936

 

1,767,747

 

(482,260

)

1,285,487

 

1,096,475

 

Stonehenge (KY)

 

Glasgow, KY

 

1983

 

54

 

111,632

 

983,596

 

—

 

203,547

 

111,632

 

1,187,143

 

1,298,774

 

(317,463

)

981,312

 

724,480

 

Stonehenge I (Ric)

 

Richmond, IN

 

1984

 

59

 

156,343

 

1,377,552

 

—

 

257,803

 

156,343

 

1,635,355

 

1,791,698

 

(472,554

)

1,319,145

 

1,026,758

 

Sugartree I

 

New Smyrrna Beach, FL

 

1984

 

61

 

155,018

 

1,453,696

 

—

 

420,796

 

155,018

 

1,874,493

 

2,029,511

 

(483,749

)

1,545,761

 

866,927

 

Summit Center (FL)

 

W. Palm Beach, FL

 

1987

 

87

 

670,000

 

1,733,312

 

—

 

419,267

 

670,000

 

2,152,579

 

2,822,579

 

(565,874

)

2,256,705

 

2,080,731

 

Sunnyside

 

Tifton, GA

 

1984

 

72

 

166,887

 

1,470,612

 

—

 

263,335

 

166,887

 

1,733,947

 

1,900,834

 

(475,049

)

1,425,786

 

1,196,457

 

Sutton Place (FL)

 

Lakeland, FL

 

1984

 

55

 

120,887

 

1,065,150

 

—

 

379,718

 

120,887

 

1,444,868

 

1,565,755

 

(406,654

)

1,159,101

 

757,616

 

Terrace Trace

 

Tampa, FL

 

1985

 

87

 

193,916

 

1,708,615

 

—

 

355,171

 

193,916

 

2,063,786

 

2,257,702

 

(557,039

)

1,700,663

 

1,470,505

 

Timbercreek

 

Toledo, OH

 

1987

 

77

 

203,420

 

1,792,350

 

—

 

363,620

 

203,420

 

2,155,970

 

2,359,390

 

(554,829

)

1,804,561

 

1,385,279

 

 

S-16



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Capitalized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subsequent to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to

 

Acquisition

 

Gross Amount Carried

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

(Improvements, net) (E)

 

at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Turkscap III

 

Brandon, FL

 

1982

 

50

 

135,850

 

1,196,987

 

—

 

356,128

 

135,850

 

1,553,116

 

1,688,966

 

(419,583

)

1,269,383

 

703,114

 

Valleybrook

 

Newnan, GA

 

1986

 

71

 

254,490

 

2,242,463

 

—

 

339,093

 

254,490

 

2,581,556

 

2,836,046

 

(617,101

)

2,218,946

 

1,341,972

 

Valleyfield (KY)

 

Lexington, KY

 

1985

 

83

 

252,329

 

2,223,757

 

—

 

436,862

 

252,329

 

2,660,620

 

2,912,948

 

(689,211

)

2,223,738

 

1,678,901

 

Valleyfield I

 

Decatur, GA

 

1984

 

66

 

252,413

 

2,224,134

 

—

 

292,993

 

252,413

 

2,517,127

 

2,769,540

 

(646,701

)

2,122,839

 

1,440,359

 

Waterbury (IN)

 

Greenwood, IN

 

1984

 

44

 

105,245

 

927,324

 

—

 

133,668

 

105,245

 

1,060,992

 

1,166,238

 

(282,295

)

883,942

 

753,827

 

West Of Eastland

 

Columbus, OH

 

1977

 

124

 

234,544

 

2,066,675

 

—

 

464,656

 

234,544

 

2,531,331

 

2,765,875

 

(723,147

)

2,042,728

 

1,830,760

 

Wilcrest Woods

 

Savannah, GA

 

1986

 

68

 

187,306

 

1,650,373

 

—

 

302,280

 

187,306

 

1,952,654

 

2,139,960

 

(482,115

)

1,657,845

 

1,211,343

 

Willow Lakes

 

Spartanburg, SC

 

1986

 

95

 

200,990

 

1,770,937

 

—

 

286,982

 

200,990

 

2,057,919

 

2,258,909

 

(540,946

)

1,717,963

 

1,922,871

 

Willow Run (GA)

 

Stone Mountain, GA

 

1983

 

73

 

197,965

 

1,744,287

 

—

 

391,185

 

197,965

 

2,135,472

 

2,333,437

 

(575,147

)

1,758,290

 

1,580,456

 

Willow Run (IN)

 

New Albany, IN

 

1984

 

64

 

183,873

 

1,620,119

 

—

 

304,456

 

183,873

 

1,924,575

 

2,108,448

 

(476,270

)

1,632,178

 

1,034,179

 

Willow Run (KY)

 

Madisonville, KY

 

1984

 

72

 

141,016

 

1,242,352

 

—

 

411,577

 

141,016

 

1,653,929

 

1,794,945

 

(411,836

)

1,383,108

 

1,029,481

 

Willowood I (Gro)

 

Grove City, OH

 

1984

 

46

 

126,045

 

1,110,558

 

—

 

291,391

 

126,045

 

1,401,949

 

1,527,994

 

(369,115

)

1,158,879

 

866,074

 

Willowood I (IN)

 

Columbus, IN

 

1983

 

51

 

163,896

 

1,444,104

 

—

 

169,509

 

163,896

 

1,613,613

 

1,777,509

 

(407,144

)

1,370,365

 

1,053,928

 

Willowood I (KY)

 

Frankfort, KY

 

1984

 

57

 

138,822

 

1,223,176

 

—

 

270,185

 

138,822

 

1,493,362

 

1,632,184

 

(390,824

)

1,241,360

 

926,330

 

Willowood II (Gro)

 

Grove City, OH

 

1985

 

26

 

70,924

 

624,814

 

—

 

139,632

 

70,924

 

764,446

 

835,369

 

(205,796

)

629,574

 

504,836

 

Willowood II (IN)

 

Columbus, IN

 

1986

 

58

 

161,306

 

1,421,284

 

—

 

156,926

 

161,306

 

1,578,210

 

1,739,516

 

(405,813

)

1,333,703

 

1,061,829

 

Willowood II (Woo)

 

Wooster, OH

 

1986

 

53

 

103,199

 

909,398

 

—

 

245,549

 

103,199

 

1,154,947

 

1,258,147

 

(322,711

)

935,435

 

794,244

 

Willows III (OH), The

 

Columbus, OH

 

1987

 

43

 

129,221

 

1,137,783

 

—

 

190,395

 

129,221

 

1,328,179

 

1,457,400

 

(337,180

)

1,120,220

 

839,800

 

Windwood II (FL)

 

Palm Bay, FL

 

1987

 

64

 

118,915

 

1,047,598

 

—

 

355,583

 

118,915

 

1,403,181

 

1,522,097

 

(435,563

)

1,086,534

 

190,000

 

Wingwood (Orl)

 

Orlando, FL

 

1980

 

86

 

236,884

 

2,086,402

 

—

 

1,110,628

 

236,884

 

3,197,030

 

3,433,914

 

(974,134

)

2,459,780

 

1,319,482

 

Winter Woods II (FL) (REIT)

 

Winter Garden, FL

 

1986

 

44

 

95,404

 

858,637

 

—

 

151,156

 

95,404

 

1,009,793

 

1,105,197

 

(133,805

)

971,392

 

768,515

 

Winthrop Court (KY)

 

Frankfort, KY

 

1985

 

77

 

184,709

 

1,627,191

 

—

 

308,379

 

184,709

 

1,935,569

 

2,120,279

 

(513,320

)

1,606,958

 

1,336,823

 

Winthrop Court II (OH)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1986

 

38

 

102,381

 

896,576

 

—

 

202,673

 

102,381

 

1,099,249

 

1,201,630

 

(281,085

)

920,545

 

722,000

 

Woodcliff II

 

Lilburn, GA

 

1986

 

72

 

266,449

 

2,347,769

 

—

 

202,250

 

266,449

 

2,550,019

 

2,816,469

 

(619,180

)

2,197,289

 

1,537,808

 

Woodlands I (Col)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1983

 

88

 

231,996

 

2,044,233

 

—

 

629,165

 

231,996

 

2,673,397

 

2,905,393

 

(694,538

)

2,210,855

 

1,618,672

 

Woodlands I (PA)

 

Zelienople, PA

 

1983

 

50

 

163,192

 

1,437,897

 

—

 

272,842

 

163,192

 

1,710,739

 

1,873,931

 

(432,649

)

1,441,282

 

951,421

 

Woodlands II (Col)

 

Columbus, OH

 

1984

 

70

 

192,633

 

1,697,310

 

—

 

456,394

 

192,633

 

2,153,704

 

2,346,338

 

(554,292

)

1,792,046

 

1,403,663

 

Woodlands II (Str)

 

Streetsboro, OH

 

1985

 

60

 

183,996

 

1,621,205

 

—

 

300,104

 

183,996

 

1,921,309

 

2,105,305

 

(490,170

)

1,615,135

 

1,452,830

 

Lexford Wholly Owned Encumbered

 

 

 

 

 

11,287

 

30,921,788

 

258,467,698

 

—

 

55,111,368

 

30,921,788

 

313,579,066

 

344,500,854

 

(82,531,830

)

261,969,024

 

192,063,643

 

 

S-17



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

Description

 

 

 

 

 

Initial Cost to Company

 

Cost Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
(Improvements, net) (E)

 

Gross Amount Carried
at Close of Period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date of

 

 

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Building &

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Investment in Real

 

 

 

Apartment Name

 

Location

 

Construction

 

Units (I)

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures

 

Land

 

Fixtures (A)

 

Total (B)

 

Depreciation

 

Estate, Net

 

Encumbrances

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EQR Partially Owned Unencumbered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1111 25th St

 

Washington, D.C.

 

(F)

 

6

 

509,936

 

1,220,124

 

—

 

—

 

509,936

 

1,220,124

 

1,730,060

 

—

 

1,730,060

 

—

 

1210 Mass

 

Washington, D.C.

 

2004

 

144

 

9,213,512

 

30,721,339

 

—

 

30,118

 

9,213,512

 

30,751,457

 

39,964,970

 

(1,384,029

)

38,580,940

 

—

 

Ball Park Lofts

 

Denver, CO

 

2003

 

339

 

5,481,556

 

53,130,291

 

—

 

271,299

 

5,481,556

 

53,401,590

 

58,883,146

 

(3,233,455

)

55,649,691

 

—

 

Chinatown Gateway (Land)

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

(F)

 

—

 

13,191,831

 

2,527,668

 

—

 

—

 

13,191,831

 

2,527,668

 

15,719,499

 

—

 

15,719,499

 

—

 

Hudson Crossing II

 

New York, NY

 

(F)

 

—

 

12,938,900

 

192,347

 

—

 

—

 

12,938,900

 

192,347

 

13,131,247

 

—

 

13,131,247

 

—

 

Silver Spring

 

Silver Spring, MD

 

(F)

 

—

 

18,539,817

 

551,108

 

—

 

—

 

18,539,817

 

551,108

 

19,090,925

 

—

 

19,090,925

 

—

 

Springbrook Estates

 

Riverside, CA

 

(F)

 

—

 

53,091,537

 

24,910

 

—

 

—

 

53,091,537

 

24,910

 

53,116,448

 

—

 

53,116,448

 

—

 

EQR Partially Owned Unencumbered

 

 

 

 

 

489

 

112,967,090

 

88,367,787

 

—

 

301,417

 

112,967,090

 

88,669,204

 

201,636,294

 

(4,617,484

)

197,018,810

 

—

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EQR Partially Owned Encumbered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2400 M St

 

Washington, D.C.

 

(F)

 

—

 

30,006,593

 

74,329,797

 

—

 

—

 

30,006,593

 

74,329,797

 

104,336,390

 

—

 

104,336,390

 

67,139,464

 

2nd & 85th St

 

New York, NY

 

(F)

 

—

 

15,601,092

 

1,995,773

 

—

 

—

 

15,601,092

 

1,995,773

 

17,596,865

 

—

 

17,596,865

 

10,946,064

 

Alta Pacific

 

Irvine, CA

 

(F)

 

—

 

10,752,145

 

263,324

 

—

 

—

 

10,752,145

 

263,324

 

11,015,469

 

—

 

11,015,469

 

6,825,000

 

Bella Terra I

 

Mukilteo, WA

 

2002

 

235

 

5,686,861

 

26,058,326

 

—

 

235,768

 

5,686,861

 

26,294,094

 

31,980,955

 

(1,976,571

)

30,004,384

 

23,350,000

 

Brookside Crossing I

 

Stockton, CA

 

1981

 

90

 

625,000

 

4,663,298

 

—

 

1,153,304

 

625,000

 

5,816,602

 

6,441,602

 

(1,179,471

)

5,262,131

 

4,658,000

 

Brookside Crossing II

 

Stockton, CA

 

1981

 

128

 

770,000

 

5,968,397

 

—

 

1,258,903

 

770,000

 

7,227,300

 

7,997,300

 

(1,295,426

)

6,701,874

 

4,867,000

 

Canyon Creek (CA)

 

San Ramon, CA

 

1984

 

268

 

5,425,000

 

18,806,182

 

—

 

986,946

 

5,425,000

 

19,793,128

 

25,218,128

 

(3,506,181

)

21,711,947

 

28,000,000

 

Cobblestone Village

 

Fresno, CA

 

1983

 

162

 

315,000

 

7,583,079

 

—

 

1,118,185

 

315,000

 

8,701,264

 

9,016,264

 

(1,408,409

)

7,607,856

 

6,000,000

 

Country Oaks

 

Agoura Hills, CA

 

1985

 

256

 

6,105,000

 

29,562,586

 

—

 

946,174

 

6,105,000

 

30,508,760

 

36,613,760

 

(4,192,111

)

32,421,649

 

29,412,000

 

Deerfield

 

Denver, CO

 

1983

 

158

 

1,260,000

 

8,502,145

 

—

 

1,265,152

 

1,260,000

 

9,767,297

 

11,027,297

 

(1,869,041

)

9,158,256

 

9,100,000

 

Edgewater

 

Bakersfield, CA

 

1984

 

258

 

580,000

 

17,709,984

 

—

 

1,565,867

 

580,000

 

19,275,851

 

19,855,851

 

(2,801,407

)

17,054,444

 

11,988,000

 

Fox Ridge

 

Englewood, CO

 

1984

 

300

 

2,490,000

 

17,522,114

 

—

 

1,245,737

 

2,490,000

 

18,767,851

 

21,257,851

 

(3,792,954

)

17,464,897

 

20,300,000

 

Hidden Lake

 

Sacramento, CA

 

1985

 

272

 

1,715,000

 

16,413,075

 

—

 

1,492,261

 

1,715,000

 

17,905,336

 

19,620,336

 

(2,922,973

)

16,697,363

 

15,165,000

 

Indian Ridge

 

Waltham, MA

 

2005

 

264

 

6,043,073

 

38,796,812

 

—

 

62,581

 

6,043,073

 

38,859,393

 

44,902,466

 

(296,368

)

44,606,098

 

32,546,844

 

Lakeview

 

Lodi, CA

 

1983

 

138

 

950,000

 

7,284,532

 

—

 

1,143,510

 

950,000

 

8,428,041

 

9,378,041

 

(1,467,378

)

7,910,664

 

7,286,000

 

Lakewood

 

Tulsa, OK

 

1985

 

152

 

855,000

 

6,480,774

 

—

 

785,135

 

855,000

 

7,265,909

 

8,120,909

 

(1,583,632

)

6,537,277

 

5,600,000

 

Lantern Cove

 

Foster City, CA

 

1985

 

232

 

6,945,000

 

23,332,127

 

—

 

1,088,150

 

6,945,000

 

24,420,277

 

31,365,277

 

(4,070,167

)

27,295,111

 

36,403,000

 

Legacy Park Central

 

Concord, CA

 

2003

 

259

 

6,469,230

 

47,495,927

 

—

 

26,690

 

6,469,230

 

47,522,616

 

53,991,846

 

(2,731,606

)

51,260,241

 

37,650,000

 

Mesa Del Oso

 

Albuquerque, NM

 

1983

 

221

 

4,305,000

 

12,160,419

 

—

 

695,341

 

4,305,000

 

12,855,760

 

17,160,760

 

(2,546,867

)

14,613,893

 

10,428,783

 

Schooner Bay I

 

Foster City, CA

 

1985

 

168

 

5,345,000

 

20,509,960

 

—

 

1,414,537

 

5,345,000

 

21,924,498

 

27,269,498

 

(3,263,985

)

24,005,513

 

27,000,000

 

Schooner Bay II

 

Foster City, CA

 

1985

 

144

 

4,550,000

 

18,142,085

 

—

 

1,307,602

 

4,550,000

 

19,449,687

 

23,999,687

 

(2,854,715

)

21,144,972

 

23,760,000

 

South Shore

 

Stockton, CA

 

1979

 

129

 

840,000

 

9,381,507

 

—

 

1,223,624

 

840,000

 

10,605,131

 

11,445,131

 

(1,629,912

)

9,815,219

 

6,833,000

 

Tierra Antigua

 

Albuquerque, NM

 

1985

 

148

 

1,825,000

 

7,841,358

 

—

 

442,588

 

1,825,000

 

8,283,946

 

10,108,946

 

(1,651,659

)

8,457,288

 

6,162,463

 

Union Station

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

(F)

 

—

 

8,500,000

 

37,842,994

 

—

 

—

 

8,500,000

 

37,842,994

 

46,342,994

 

—

 

46,342,994

 

30,204,689

 

Vintage

 

Ontario, CA

 

(F)

 

—

 

7,059,230

 

9,918,638

 

—

 

—

 

7,059,230

 

9,918,638

 

16,977,869

 

—

 

16,977,869

 

16,735,018

 

Waterfield Square I

 

Stockton, CA

 

1984

 

170

 

950,000

 

9,300,171

 

—

 

1,678,858

 

950,000

 

10,979,028

 

11,929,028

 

(1,819,447

)

10,109,581

 

6,923,000

 

Waterfield Square II

 

Stockton, CA

 

1984

 

158

 

845,000

 

8,648,904

 

—

 

1,249,880

 

845,000

 

9,898,784

 

10,743,784

 

(1,558,153

)

9,185,631

 

6,595,000

 

Westgate

 

Pasadena, CA

 

(F)

 

—

 

46,768,848

 

6,400,250

 

—

 

—

 

46,768,848

 

6,400,250

 

53,169,098

 

—

 

53,169,098

 

25,067,184

 

Willow Brook (CA)

 

Pleasant Hill, CA

 

1985

 

228

 

5,055,000

 

20,526,037

 

—

 

756,969

 

5,055,000

 

21,283,006

 

26,338,006

 

(3,669,146

)

22,668,860

 

29,000,000

 

Willow Creek

 

Fresno, CA

 

1984

 

116

 

275,000

 

6,629,899

 

—

 

742,876

 

275,000

 

7,372,775

 

7,647,775

 

(1,227,743

)

6,420,032

 

5,112,000

 

EQR Partially Owned Encumbered

 

 

 

 

 

4,654

 

188,912,073

 

520,070,475

 

—

 

23,886,635

 

188,912,073

 

543,957,110

 

732,869,183

 

(55,315,318

)

677,553,865

 

551,057,508

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lexford Partially Owned Unencumbered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parkwood Village I (REIT)

 

Douglasville, GA

 

1985

 

69

 

172,878

 

1,555,984

 

—

 

73,662

 

172,878

 

1,629,646

 

1,802,524

 

(141,037

)

1,661,487

 

—

 

Ramblewood I (Aug) (REIT)

 

Augusta, GA

 

1985

 

84

 

172,475

 

1,552,271

 

—

 

76,581

 

172,475

 

1,628,852

 

1,801,327

 

(107,910

)

1,693,417

 

—

 

Lexford Partially Owned Unencumbered

 

 

 

 

 

153

 

345,353

 

3,108,255

 

—

 

150,243

 

345,353

 

3,258,498

 

3,603,851

 

(248,947

)

3,354,904

 

—

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lexford Partially Owned Encumbered:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amberwood I (GA) (REIT)

 

Cartersville, GA

 

1985

 

56

 

140,598

 

1,265,995

 

—

 

85,359

 

140,598

 

1,351,353

 

1,491,951

 

(110,801

)

1,381,150

 

1,307,146

 

Bridgepoint I (REIT)

 

Jacksonville, FL

 

1986

 

71

 

212,724

 

1,915,381

 

—

 

98,475

 

212,724

 

2,013,855

 

2,226,579

 

(149,341

)

2,077,238

 

1,788,194

 

Carleton Court (MI) (REIT)

 

Ann Arbor, MI

 

1985

 

104

 

323,554

 

2,911,982

 

—

 

217,542

 

323,554

 

3,129,524

 

3,453,078

 

(247,173

)

3,205,904

 

2,801,242

 

Mulberry (REIT)

 

Hilliard, OH

 

1984

 

60

 

174,826

 

1,573,722

 

—

 

36,969

 

174,826

 

1,610,691

 

1,785,517

 

(64,934

)

1,720,583

 

1,069,029

 

Palm Side (REIT)

 

Palm Bay, FL

 

1986

 

87

 

116,334

 

1,047,004

 

—

 

72,817

 

116,334

 

1,119,821

 

1,236,155

 

(134,466

)

1,101,688

 

1,031,194

 

Parkwood Village II (REIT)

 

Douglasville, GA

 

1987

 

66

 

207,576

 

1,868,265

 

—

 

67,802

 

207,576

 

1,936,067

 

2,143,642

 

(154,199

)

1,989,444

 

1,237,444

 

Redwood Hollow (REIT)

 

Smyrna, TN

 

1986

 

72

 

129,586

 

1,166,522

 

—

 

164,617

 

129,586

 

1,331,139

 

1,460,725

 

(143,491

)

1,317,234

 

1,154,289

 

Springtree (REIT)

 

W. Palm Beach, FL

 

1982

 

72

 

183,100

 

1,648,301

 

—

 

217,337

 

183,100

 

1,865,638

 

2,048,738

 

(385,925

)

1,662,813

 

1,091,516

 

Sugartree II (REIT)

 

New Smyrna Beach, FL

 

1985

 

60

 

178,416

 

1,599,476

 

—

 

76,760

 

178,416

 

1,676,236

 

1,854,652

 

(152,378

)

1,702,274

 

1,422,781

 

Willowood East I (REIT)

 

Indianapolis, IN

 

1984

 

60

 

114,364

 

1,029,496

 

—

 

12,024

 

114,364

 

1,041,520

 

1,155,884

 

(33,783

)

1,122,100

 

914,940

 

Lexford Partially Owned Encumbered

 

 

 

 

 

708

 

1,781,078

 

16,026,142

 

—

 

1,049,701

 

1,781,078

 

17,075,843

 

18,856,920

 

(1,576,491

)

17,280,429

 

13,817,776

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Portfolio/Entity Emcumbrances
(See S-2)

 

 

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

—

 

985,111,291

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Consolidated Investment in Real Estate

 

 

 

 

 

181,505

 

$

     3,087,095,066

 

$

       12,437,275,789

 

$

         —

 

$

       1,065,999,454

 

$

       3,087,095,066

 

$

      13,503,275,244

 

$

      16,590,370,309

 

$

      (2,888,140,405

)

$

      13,702,229,904

 

$

       3,379,288,585

 

 


 

S-18



 

EQUITY RESIDENTIAL

Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, 2005

 

NOTES:

 

(A)

 

The balance of furniture & fixtures included in the total investment in real estate amount was $753,616,116 as of December 31, 2005.

(B)

 

The aggregate cost for Federal Income Tax purposes as of December 31, 2005 was approximately $9.4 billion.

(C)

 

The life to compute depreciation for building is 30 years, for building improvements ranges from 5 to 10 years, for furniture & fixtures and replacements is 5 years, and for in-place leases is the average remaining term of each respective lease.

(D)

 

This asset consists of various acquisition dates and largely represents furniture, fixtures and equipment, leasehold improvements and capitalized software costs owned by the Management Business, which are generally depreciated over periods ranging from 3 to 7 years.

(E)

 

Primarily represents capital expenditures for major maintenance and replacements incurred subsequent to each property’s acquisition date.

(F)

 

Represents land, construction-in-progress and/or miscellaneous pursuit costs on projects either held for future development or projects currently under development.

(G)

 

A portion or all of these properties includes commercial space (retail, parking and/or office space).

(H)

 

These three properties are pledged as additional collateral in connection with various tax-exempt bond financings.

(I)

 

Total properties and units exclude the Unconsolidated Properties consisting of 57 properties and 15,899 units.

 

S-19



 

EXHIBIT INDEX
 

Exhibit

 

Document

 

 

 

10.21

 

Fourth Amendment to Equity Residential 2002 Share Incentive Plan.

10.35

 

Equity Residential Supplemental Executive Retirement Savings Plan as Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2003.

10.36

 

Amendment No. 1 to the Equity Residential Supplemental Executive Retirement Savings Plan.

 

 

 

12

 

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges.

 

 

 

21

 

List of Subsidiaries of Equity Residential.

 

 

 

23.1

 

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

 

 

 

24.1

 

Power of Attorney for John W. Alexander dated February 27, 2006.

24.2

 

Power of Attorney for Stephen O. Evans dated February 28, 2006.

24.3

 

Power of Attorney for Charles L. Atwood dated February 24, 2006.

24.4

 

Power of Attorney for Desiree G. Rogers dated March 1, 2006.

24.5

 

Power of Attorney for B. Joseph White dated February 23, 2006.

24.6

 

Power of Attorney for Sheli Z. Rosenberg dated February 23, 2006.

24.7

 

Power of Attorney for James D. Harper, Jr. dated February 24, 2006.

24.8

 

Power of Attorney for Boone A. Knox dated February 24, 2006.

24.9

 

Power of Attorney for Samuel Zell dated February 24, 2006.

24.10

 

Power of Attorney for Gerald A. Spector dated February 27, 2006.

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification of David J. Neithercut, Chief Executive Officer.

31.2

 

Certification of Donna Brandin, Chief Financial Officer.

32.1

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of David J. Neithercut, Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

32.2

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Donna Brandin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company.