Stratus Properties
STRS
#9406
Rank
A$0.21 B
Marketcap
A$26.59
Share price
0.27%
Change (1 day)
-8.56%
Change (1 year)
Text size:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period From .......... to ..........
Commission file number 0-19989

Stratus Properties Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in Charter)

Delaware 72-1211572
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 220
Austin, Texas 78701
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (512) 478-5788

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock Par Value $0.01 per Share
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. X

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-
affiliates of the registrant was approximately $44,478,800 on
March 7, 2000.

On March 7, 2000, 14,288,270 shares of Common Stock, par
value $0.01 per share, of the registrant were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Portions of the registrant's Proxy Statement to be submitted
to the registrant's stockholders in connection with its 2000
Annual Meeting to be held on May 11, 2000, are incorporated by
reference into Part III of this Report.


TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page

Part I..........................................................1

Item 1. Business .............................................1
Overview...............................................1
Company Strategies.....................................1
Credit Facility........................................2
Transactions with Olympus Real Estate Corporation......2
Regulation and Environmental Matters...................3
Employees..............................................3
Cautionary Statements..................................3

Item 2. Properties.............................................5

Item 3. Legal Proceedings......................................5

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Executive Officers of the Registrant ..................6

Part II.........................................................6

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters....................................7

Item 6. Selected Financial Data................................7

Items 7. and 7A.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and Disclosures
about Market Risks ....................................8

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data...........14

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure...................15

Part III ......................................................28

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant....28

Item 11. Executive Compensation................................28

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management........................................28

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions........28

Part IV. ......................................................28

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and
Reports on Form 8-K...................................28

Signatures....................................................S-1

Financial Statement Schedules.................................F-1

Exhibits......................................................E-1


PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
Our company was formed in March 1992, to hold, operate and
develop substantially all the domestic real estate then held for
development by, and substantially all of the domestic oil and gas
properties of, our former parent Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (see Note
1 to Notes To Financial Statements). All subsequent references to
"Notes" refer to the Notes To Financial Statements located in
Item 8, of this Form 10-K. We also assumed the related
liabilities associated with these properties, including
approximately $500 million of indebtedness, which was guaranteed
by Freeport-McMoRan. This guarantee was subsequently assumed by
IMC Global Inc. (see Notes 1 and 5). We have sold all of our oil
and gas properties and our current business is solely real estate
operations.

We are engaged in the acquisition, development, management
and sale of commercial and residential real estate properties. We
conduct real estate operations on properties we own and through
unconsolidated affiliates that we jointly own with Olympus Real
Estate Corporation (see "Transactions with Olympus Real Estate
Corporation" below).

Our principal real estate holdings are currently in the
Austin, Texas area. Our most significant acreage includes the
approximate 2,300 acres of undeveloped residential, multi-family
and commercial property located in southwest Austin within the
Barton Creek community and 500 acres of undeveloped residential,
multi-family and commercial property known as the Lantana tract,
located south of and adjacent to the Barton Creek community. Our
remaining Austin acreage consists of about 1,300 acres of
undeveloped commercial and multi-family property within the
Circle C Ranch development, also located in southwest Austin.

We also own 24 developed lots, 120 acres of undeveloped
residential property and 33 acres of undeveloped commercial and
multi-family property located in Dallas, Houston and San Antonio,
Texas which are being actively marketed.

Company Strategies
Since our formation, our primary objective has been to
reduce our indebtedness and to eliminate the debt guarantee. In
December 1999, as a result of our negotiation of a new credit
facility, we were able to eliminate the debt guarantee. Our
outstanding debt totaled $16.6 million at December 31, 1999
compared with $493.3 million in March 1992.

With the new credit facility, we now have more autonomy and
fewer restrictions on our business activities. We can now fully
concentrate our efforts on developing our properties and
increasing shareholder value. Key factors in accomplishing these
goals include:

. Our overall strategy is to enhance the value of our Austin
properties by securing and maintaining development
entitlements, developing and building real estate projects for
sale or investment, thereby increasing the potential return
from our core assets. We may own these future developments
outright or they may be developed through joint ventures with
others. We have had significant development activity through
joint ventures during the last half of 1998 and during 1999
and expect that activity to continue as we continue to expand
our relationship with Olympus (see below).

During 1999, we completed the development of the 75 residential
lots at the Wimberly Lane subdivision at Barton Creek and by the
end of 1999, 42 of the lots had been sold with the balance under
contract to close during 2000. We are continuing our efforts to
develop several new subdivisions around the new Tom Fazio designed
"Fazio Canyons" golf course, including our most recent joint venture
arrangement to develop 54 multi-acre residential lots at the Escala
Drive subdivision at Barton Creek. These lots will be completed and
intial sales will occur around mid-2000. Also during 1999, we completed and
fully leased the first 70,000 square foot office building at the 140,000
square foot Lantana Corporate Center. Construction and pre-leasing has
begun on the second 70,000 square foot office building, with its expected
completion date being mid-2000.

. We are currently permitting additional residential property at
Barton Creek, and we expect to secure final approval for the first
subdivision by the end of 2000.

Additional commercial and multi-family sites within Lantana are
also being permitted. Final approval for these sites are expected to
be received during 2000.
1

. We believe that we have the right to receive up to $30 million
of future reimbursements associated with previously incurred
utility infrastructure development costs. Substantial
additional costs eligible for reimbursement will be incurred
in the future as our development activities continue. We
received $13.1 million of Municipal Utility District (MUD)
reimbursements during 1999 of which $2.8 million was
associated with the Barton Creek MUDs, while the remaining
$10.3 million was received from the City of Austin (the City)
as a partial payment of our Circle C MUD claim. We continue
to seek a final resolution or enforcement pertaining to our
entitlement rights to the approximate $9 million in remaining
Circle C MUD reimbursements. See Item 3, "Legal Proceedings,"
for more details on that matter.

. We face significant challenges to the development entitlements
of our core properties in Austin, which are more fully
discussed under Item 3, "Legal Proceedings." We will continue
to vigorously defend our rights to the development
entitlements of all our properties, but aggressive attempts to
restrict growth in the area of our holdings have had and are
expected to continue to have a negative effect on near term
development and sales activities.

. We are expanding our real estate management activities,
primarily as a result of our role as manager in the various
joint venture projects. We also continue to be retained by
third parties to provide management assistance on selective
real estate projects, including the Lakeway project, near
Austin.

. We also continue to investigate and pursue opportunities for
new projects which require minimal capital from us and which
offer the possibility of acceptable returns and limited risk.

Credit Facility
In December 1999, we established a new bank credit facility
with Comerica Bank-Texas, which provides for a $20 million term
loan and a $10 million revolving line of credit. We borrowed $20
million under the term loan portion of the facility and repaid
all our outstanding borrowings under the previous credit
facility, which was then terminated. This retirement of the
previous credit facility removed the guarantee of our
indebtedness by IMC Global, which assumed the guarantee from
Freeport-McMoRan in connection with the merger in 1997 (see Note
1). Our debt is no longer guaranteed by any third party. Under
terms of the new facility, we are required to make minimum
repayments under the term loan of $2.5 million in 2000 and an
additional $5.0 million in 2001. We have already met our 2000
requirement by repaying $6.1 million prior to December 31, 1999.
The facility will mature in December 2002, subject to our option
to extend the maturity until December 2003. For a further
discussion of the credit facility see Note 5, and Items 7 and 7A,
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and Disclosure About Market Risks."

Transactions with Olympus Real Estate Corporation
On May 22, 1998, we formed a strategic alliance with Olympus
Real Estate Corporation, an affiliate of Hicks, Muse, Tate and
Furst Incorporated, to develop certain of our existing properties
and to pursue new real estate acquisition and development
opportunities. Under the terms of the agreement, Olympus
purchased $10 million of our mandatorily redeemable preferred
stock, provided us a $10 million convertible debt facility and
agreed to make available up to $50 million of additional capital
representing its share of direct investments in joint
Stratus/Olympus projects. Olympus has the right to nominate one
member or up to 20 percent of our Board of Directors, whichever
is greater.

We have entered into three joint ventures with Olympus. We
own 49.9 percent of each joint venture and Olympus owns the
remaining 50.1 percent. We are the developer and manager for each
of the joint venture projects. Accordingly, we receive various
development fees, sales commissions and other management fees for
our services.

The first two joint ventures were formed on September 30,
1998. The first provided for the development of a 75 residential
lot project at the Barton Creek Wimberly Lane subdivision. We
sold the land to the joint venture for approximately $3.2 million
and paid approximately $0.5 million for our equity interest in
the now fully developed project. The other transaction involved
approximately 700 developed lots and 80 acres of platted but
undeveloped real estate at the Walden on Lake Houston project,
which Olympus purchased in April 1998 and we have managed ever
since. We acquired our interest in the related partnership
utilizing $2.0 million of funds available under the Olympus
convertible debt facility. During the third quarter of 1999, we
formed a third joint venture associated with the construction of
the first 70,000 square foot office building at the Lantana
Corporate Center. In this transaction we sold 5.5 acres of
commercial real estate to the joint venture for $1.0 million. In
December 1999, we sold 174 acres of our Barton Creek residential
property to the joint venture initially formed to develop the
lots at the Wimberly Lane subdivision (see above) for $11
million. The land will be developed into 54 multi-acre single-
family residential lots, which when completed will be the largest
lots developed to date within the Barton Creek community. For
a detailed
2

discussion of these transactions see "Joint Ventures
with Olympus Real Estate Corporation" included in Items 7 and 7A
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and Disclosures About Market Risks."

Regulation and Environmental Matters
Our real estate investments are subject to extensive local,
city, county and state rules and regulations regarding
permitting, zoning, subdivision, utilities and water quality as
well as federal rules and regulations regarding air and water
quality and protection of endangered species and their habitats.
Such regulation has delayed and will likely continue to delay
development of our properties and result in higher developmental
and administrative costs. See Item 3, "Legal Proceedings."

We are making, and will continue to make, expenditures for
the protection of the environment with respect to our real estate
development activities. Emphasis on environmental matters will
result in additional costs in the future. Based on an analysis of
our operations in relation to current and presently anticipated
environmental requirements, we currently do not anticipate that
these costs will have a material adverse effect on our future
operations or financial condition.

Employees
At December 31, 1999, we had 19 employees, who manage our
operations. We own 10 percent of a corporation which provides us
with certain management and administrative services, including
technical, administrative, accounting, financial, tax, and other
services, under a management services agreement. We may terminate
this contract at any time upon 90 days notice to the affiliated
corporation. Costs for services provided under this contract
prior to January 1, 1998 were fixed at $0.5 million per annum,
subject to annual cost of living adjustments. However, effective
January 1, 1998, these services are provided on a cost
reimbursement basis, which totaled $0.9 million in 1999 and $1.0
million in 1998.

Cautionary Statements
This report includes "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking
statements are all statements other than statements of historical
fact included in this report, including, without limitation, the
statements under the headings "Business," "Properties," "Market
for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters,"
and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations and Disclosures About Market Risks"
regarding our financial position and liquidity, payment of
dividends, strategic plans, future financing plans, development
and capital expenditures, business strategies, and our other
plans and objectives for future operations and activities.

Forward-looking statements are based on our assumptions and
analysis made in light of our experience and perception of
historical trends, current conditions, expected future
developments and other factors that we believe are appropriate
under the circumstances. These statements are subject to a
number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, including the
risk factors discussed below and in our other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, general economic and business
conditions, the business opportunities that may be presented to
and pursued by us, changes in laws or regulations and other
factors, many of which are beyond our control. Readers are
cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of
future performance and the actual results or developments may
differ materially from those projected, predicted or assumed in
the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations
include, among others, the following:

If we are unable to generate sufficient cash from operations we
may find it necessary to curtail our development operations. We
have made substantial reductions in debt since our formation in
1992. However, significant capital resources will be required to
fund our development expenditures and our debt reduction
requirements under the new credit facility. Our performance
continues to be dependent on future cash flows from real estate
sales, and there can be no assurance that we will generate
sufficient cash flow or otherwise obtain sufficient funds to meet
the expected development plans for our properties and to meet the
debt reduction requirements under the facility.

Our real estate operations are also dependent upon the
availability and cost of mortgage financing for potential
customers, to the extent they finance their purchases, and for
buyers of the potential customers' existing residences.
3

Our results of operations and financial condition are greatly
affected by the performance of the real estate industry. Our
real estate activities are subject to numerous factors beyond our
control, including local real estate market conditions (both
where our properties are located and in areas where our potential
customers reside), substantial existing and potential
competition, the cyclical nature of the real estate business,
general national, regional and local economic conditions,
fluctuations in interest rates and mortgage availability and
changes in demographic conditions. Real estate markets have
historically been subject to strong periodic cycles driven by
numerous factors beyond the control of market participants.

Real estate investments often cannot easily be converted
into cash and market values may be adversely affected by these
economic circumstances, market fundamentals, competition and
demographic conditions. Because of the effect these factors have
on real estate values, it is difficult to predict with certainty
the level of future sales or sales prices that will be realized
for individual assets.

Our operations are subject to an intensive regulatory approval
process. Before we can develop a property we must obtain a
variety of approvals from local and state governments with
respect to such matters as zoning, density, parking, subdivision,
architectural design and environmental issues. These approvals
are discretionary by nature. Because certain government agencies
and special interest groups have expressed concerns about our
development plans in or near Austin, our ability to develop these
properties and realize future income from our properties could be
delayed, reduced, prevented or made more expensive.

The City and certain special interest groups have long
opposed certain of our plans in the Austin area and have taken
various actions to partially or completely restrict development
in certain areas, including areas where some of our most valuable
properties are located. We are actively opposing these actions.
We currently do not believe unfavorable rulings would have a
significant long-term adverse effect on the overall value of our
property holdings. However, because of the regulatory environment
that continues to exist in the Austin area and the intensive
opposition of certain interest groups, there can be no assurance
that such expectations will prove correct. A more complete
discussion of these matters is set forth under Item 3, "Legal
Proceedings."

Our operations are subject to governmental environmental
regulation, which can change at any time and generally would
result in an increase to our costs. Real estate development is
subject to state and federal regulations and to possible
interruption or termination because of environmental
considerations, including, without limitation, air and water
quality and protection of endangered species and their habitats.
Certain of the Barton Creek properties include nesting
territories for the Golden Cheek Warbler, a federally listed
endangered species. In February 1995 we received a permit from
the U.S. Wildlife Service pursuant to the Endangered Species Act,
which to date has allowed the development of the Barton Creek
properties free of restrictions under the Endangered Species Act
related to the maintenance of habitat for the Golden Cheek
Warbler.

Additionally, in April 1997, the U.S. Department of Interior
listed the Barton Springs Salamander as an endangered species
after a federal court overturned a March 1997 decision by the
Department of Interior not to list the Barton Springs Salamander
based on a conservation agreement between the State of Texas and
federal agencies. The listing of the Barton Springs Salamander
hasn't affected, nor do we anticipate it will affect, our Barton
Creek and Lantana properties for several reasons, including the
results of technical studies and our U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service 10(a) permit obtained in 1995. Our Circle C properties
may, however, be affected, although the extent of any impact
cannot be determined at this time. Special interest groups
provided written notice of their intention to challenge our 10(a)
permit and compliance with water quality regulations, but no
challenge has yet occurred.

We are making, and will continue to make, expenditures with
respect to our real estate development for the protection of the
environment. Emphasis on environmental matters will result in
additional costs in the future.

The real estate business is very competitive and many of our
competitors are larger and financially stronger than we are. The
real estate business is highly competitive. We compete with a
large number of companies and individuals, and many of them have
significantly greater financial and other resources than we have.
Our competitors include local developers who are committed
primarily to particular markets and also against national
developers who acquire properties throughout the United States.

We are vulnerable to risks because our operations are currently
exclusive to the Texas market. Our real estate activities are
located entirely in the Austin, Dallas, Houston and San Antonio,
Texas areas. Because of our geographic concentration and limited
number of projects, our operations are more vulnerable to local
economic downturns and adverse project-specific risks than those
of larger, more diversified companies.
4

The performance of the Texas economy affects our sales and
consequently the underlying values of our properties. While the
Texas economy has remained healthy in recent years, its economy
has historically been subject to cyclical downturns primarily as
a result of adverse economic conditions within the oil and gas
industry.

Our operations are subject to natural risks. Our performance may
be adversely affected by weather conditions that delay
development or damage property.

Item 2. Properties
Our holdings, including our inventory of finished lots and
acreage to be developed but excluding our holdings in joint
ventures, are provided in the following table. The acreage to be
developed is broken down into anticipated uses for single-family
lots, multi-family units and commercial development based upon
our understanding of the properties' existing entitlements.
However, there is no assurance that the undeveloped acreage will
be so developed because of the nature of the approval and
development process and market demand for a particular use. See
Item 3, "Legal Proceedings," for more details. For information
concerning our unconsolidated affiliates' real estate holdings,
see "Transaction with Olympus Real Estate Corporation" above and
"Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and Disclosures About Market Risks" in Items
7 and 7A below.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Potential Development Acreage
-----------------------------------------
Developed Single
Lots Family Multi-family Commercial Total
--------- ------ ------------ ---------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Austin
Barton Creek - 1,351 249 673 2,273
Lantana - 154 36 311 501
Circle C - - 212 1,062 1,274
Dallas
Bent Tree - - 10 - 10
Houston
Copper Lakes 16 120 - - 120
San Antonio
Camino Real 8 - 23 - 23
--------- ------ ------------ ---------- ------
Total 24 1,625 530 2,046 4,201
========= ====== ============ ========== ======
</TABLE>

Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Various regulatory matters and litigation involving the
development of our Austin properties are summarized below.

The City's WQPZ Action: The City of Austin, Texas v. Horse Thief
Hollow Ranch, Ltd., et al., Cause No. 98-00248 (Travis County
345th Judicial District Court, Texas filed 1/9/98). On January
9, 1998, the City filed suit in Travis County District Court
against 14 Water Quality Protection Zones (WQPZs) and their
owners, including the Barton Creek WQPZ, challenging the
constitutionality of the legislation authorizing the creation of
water quality zones. The Attorney General of Texas intervened in
this suit and the Circle C WQPZ litigation, described below, to
join in the defense of the legislation. A summary judgment
hearing was conducted in the Travis County District Court on July
9, 1998. The District Court entered an order granting the City's
motion for summary judgment and declaring the WQPZ legislation
unconstitutional. All parties agreed to the form of an order
which permitted an expedited appeal directly to the Texas Supreme
Court. Oral argument was presented to the Texas Supreme Court on
December 9, 1998. A ruling is expected in the near future.

Circle C WQPZ Litigation: L.S. Ranch, Ltd. And Circle C Land
Corp., v. The City of Austin, Texas, Cause No. 97-1048 (Hays
County 207th Judicial District Court, Texas filed 10/31/97).
Circle C Land Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Stratus, filed
a WQPZ (Circle C WQPZ) covering a portion of the Circle C
development, consisting of 554 acres located outside the
boundaries of any municipal utility district. In November 1997,
Stratus sought a declaratory judgment in the Hays County District
Court to confirm the validity of the Circle C WQPZ.

On September 4, 1998, the Hays County District Court ruled
that the WQPZ enabling legislation was constitutional and that
the Circle C WQPZ was validly created. The City has appealed the
Hays County District Court's ruling to the Texas Third Court of
Appeals. Both parties submitted briefs and on September 15, 1999
oral argument was presented to the Third Court of Appeals.
5

The principal issue involved in this case, the
constitutionality of the enabling legislation authorizing the
creation of WQPZs, is already pending before the Texas Supreme
Court in the City's WQPZ action described above and is expected
to be resolved in connection with that case. Assuming the Texas
Supreme Court determines that the enabling legislation is
constitutional, certain important collateral issues are pending
before the Third Court of Appeals. Those issues, which involve
the application of the WQPZ enabling legislation to Stratus' WQPZ
at Circle C, are expected to be resolved in Stratus' favor.

Annexation/Circle C MUD Reimbursement Suit: Circle C Land Corp.
v. The City of Austin, Texas, Cause No. 97-13994 (Travis County
53rd Judicial District Court, Texas filed 12/19/97). On December
19, 1997, the City annexed all land formerly lying within the
Circle C project. If the City's annexation is valid, Stratus'
property located within Circle C's municipal utility districts
(MUD) and annexed by the City is subject to the City's zoning and
development regulations. Additionally, the City is required to
assume all MUD debt and reimburse Stratus for a significant
portion of the costs incurred for water, wastewater and drainage
infrastructure. Because the City failed to pay these costs upon
annexation, as required by statute, Stratus sued the City. The
City paid a portion of Stratus' claim, as described below. A
trial of the balance of Stratus' claim is expected to be set
during the second quarter of 2000.

The City's total reimbursement obligation to the Circle C
developers, resulting from its annexation, is estimated at $22
million. On October 29, 1999, Circle C Land Corp. and the City
reached an agreement in which Stratus received $9.8 million
(including $1 million of interest) as partial payment of its MUD
reimbursement claims. On January 14, 2000, Stratus received an
additional $0.3 million from the City resulting from both parties
agreeing to the adjustment of prior engineering and accounting
estimates. Under the terms of the agreement, Stratus would be
required to return the money to the City and the City would be
required to return the utility infrastructure to Stratus if the
City's annexation is reversed or otherwise legally rescinded,
whether by legislative action, final action of the appellate
court or other legal process. Stratus' remaining share is
estimated at approximately $9.0 million, exclusive of penalties
and interest. See Note 10 for further discussion of the City's
partial payment of the Circle C MUD reimbursement.

During the 1999 legislative session two laws were enacted
enhancing Stratus' MUD reimbursement claim against the City, as
described in "Legislative Matters" below. These laws became
effective on September 1, 1999, and Stratus is accordingly
entitled to penalties and interest on the outstanding delinquent
Circle C MUD reimbursements. Stratus will continue to pursue
this action vigorously.

Legislative Matters: In the 1997 Texas State legislative
session, a bill to reorganize a state governmental agency
inadvertently repealed the provisions of law (H.B. 4 and S.B.
1704), that established grandfathered rights for previously
permitted lands. In response to the legislature's inadvertent
repeal, the City enacted an ordinance establishing regulations on
land development that effectively eliminated the grandfathered
rights. The City attempted to apply these regulations to
portions of Stratus' Circle C property and Lantana. In response,
Stratus undertook to assert and defend its grandfathered
entitlements vigorously. In April 1999, the Texas State House of
Representatives and Senate overwhelmingly approved H.B. 1704,
which reinstated the grandfathered rights previously
inadvertently repealed. This bill became law effective on May
11, 1999.

Three other laws were enacted during the second quarter of
1999, which are expected to have a positive impact on Stratus'
development rights for its Austin-area properties and strengthen
its position in collecting the Circle C MUD reimbursements
currently being litigated (see "Annexation/Circle C MUD
Reimbursements Suit" above). The three laws enacted are: S.B.
262, which requires a municipality that annexed property in a MUD
to pay penalties and interest on utility infrastructure
reimbursements associated with the annexed properties that are
not timely paid by the municipality; S.B. 1165, which validates
the creation of existing water quality protection zones; and S.B.
89, which requires a municipality to pay developers for utility
infrastructure within a MUD controlled and operated by a
municipality in conjunction with an annexation, regardless of
whether or not the municipality's annexation is ultimately
validated.

We maintain liability insurance to cover some, but not all,
potential liabilities normally incident to the ordinary course of
our business as well as other insurance coverage customary in our
business, with such coverage limits as management deems prudent.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.

Executive Officers of the Registrant
Certain information, as of March 9, 2000, regarding our
executive officers is set forth in the following table and
accompanying text.
6

Name Age Position or Office
---- --- ------------------
William H. Armstrong III 35 Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer

Kenneth N. Jones 40 General Counsel

Mr. Armstrong has been employed by us since our inception in
1992. He has served us as Chairman of the Board since August
1998, Chief Executive Officer since May 1998 and President since
August 1996. Previously Mr. Armstrong served as Chief Operating
Officer from August 1996 to May 1998 and as Chief Financial
Officer from May 1996 to August 1996. He served as Executive
Vice President from August 1995 to August 1996. Previously, Mr.
Armstrong was a member of the Finance and Business Development
Group of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. with responsibility for real
estate activities.

Mr. Jones has served as our General Counsel since August
1998. Mr. Jones is a partner with the law firm of Armbrust Brown
& Davis, L.L.P. and he provides legal and business advisory
services under a consulting arrangement with his firm.


PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters
Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market under
the symbol STRS. The following table sets forth, for the periods
indicated, the range of high and low sales prices, as reported by
Nasdaq.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
---------------- ---------------
High Low High Low
------- ------- ------- ------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
First Quarter $ 4.63 $ 3.13 $ 7.13 $ 4.63
Second Quarter 5.00 2.88 6.63 3.88
Third Quarter 5.25 3.75 4.75 3.00
Fourth Quarter 4.88 3.75 4.13 2.63

</TABLE>

As of February 28, 2000 there were 8,343 holders of record
of our common stock. We have not in the past paid, and do not
anticipated in the future paying, cash dividends on our common
stock. The decision whether or not to pay dividends and in what
amounts is solely within the discretion of our Board of
Directors. However, our current ability to pay dividends is also
restricted by the terms of our credit agreement, as discussed in
Note 5.


Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth our selected historical
financial data for each of the five years in the period ended
December 31, 1999. The historical financial information is
derived from our audited financial statements and is not
necessarily indicative of our future results. You should read
the information in the table below together with Items 7 and 7A
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations and Disclosures About Market Risks" and
Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplemental Data."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

1999 1998 1997a 1996 1995
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Years Ended December 31:
Revenues $ 14,676 $ 17,590 $ 30,953 $ - $ -
Loss from Partnership - - - (346) (571)
Operating income (loss) 3,350 (572) 3,907 (566) (2,367)
Net income (loss) 2,871 (2,638) 7,006b 76 153
Basic net income (loss)
per share 0.20 (0.18) 0.49 0.01 0.01
Diluted net income (loss)
per share 0.18 (0.18) 0.48 0.01 0.01

Basic average shares
outstanding 14,288 14,288 14,288 14,286 14,286
Diluted average shares
outstanding 16,238c 14,288 14,517 14,390 14,312
7
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
------- ------- ------- ------- ------
(in Thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
At December 31:
Real estate and facilities,
net 91,664 96,556 105,274 - -
Investment in the
Partnership - - - 56,055 56,401
Total assets 115,672 111,829 112,754 60,985 60,897
Long-term debt 16,562 29,178 37,118 - d d
Stockholders' equity 66,840 63,969 66,607 59,599 59,523

</TABLE>

- ---------------------------
a. Prior to 1997, our operating results were reported
under the equity basis of accounting, reflecting our
investment in an operating partnership through which we conducted
our operations. See Note 1 of Notes To Financial Statements.
b. Includes a $4.5 million ($0.31 per share) gain from
sale of oil and gas properties.
c. Assumes the redemption of our 1.7 million shares of
outstanding mandatorily redeemable preferred stock for 1.7
million shares of common stock.
d. Long-term debt was not reflected in our consolidated
financial position because our investment in the operating
partnership was recorded under the equity method (see Note 1).
The separate debt amounts included in Investment in the
Partnership prior to 1997 were $58,325 for 1996 and $121,294
for 1995.


Items 7. and 7A. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Disclosures About
Market Risks

Overview
We are engaged in the acquisition, development, management
and sale of commercial and residential real estate properties. We
conduct real estate operations on properties we own and through
unconsolidated affiliates we jointly own with Olympus Real Estate
Corporation (see "Joint Ventures with Olympus Real Estate
Corporation" below), pursuant to a strategic alliance formed in
May 1998.

Our principal real estate holdings are currently in the
Austin, Texas area. Our most significant acreage includes the
approximate 2,300 acres of undeveloped residential, multi-family
and commercial property located in southwest Austin within the
Barton Creek community and 500 acres of undeveloped residential,
multi-family and commercial property known as the Lantana tract,
located south of and adjacent to the Barton Creek community. Our
remaining Austin acreage consists of about 1,300 acres of
undeveloped commercial and multi-family property within the
Circle C Ranch development, also located in southwest Austin.

We also own 24 developed lots, 120 acres of undeveloped
residential property and 33 acres of undeveloped commercial and
multi-family property located in Dallas, Houston and San Antonio,
Texas which are being actively marketed. Unaffiliated
professional real estate developers who have been retained to
provide master planning, zoning, permitting, development,
construction and marketing services for the properties manage
these real estate interests. Under the terms of these
agreements, we fund operating expenses and development costs
associated with these properties, net of revenues. Also, the
developers are entitled to a management fee and a 25 percent
interest in the net profits, after we recover our investments and
a stated rate of return, resulting from the sale of properties
under their management. As of December 31, 1999 no amounts have
been or are expected to be paid in connection with these net
profit arrangements.

Joint Ventures With Olympus Real Estate Corporation (Olympus)
We have entered into three joint ventures with Olympus, an
affiliate of Hicks, Muse, Tate & Furst Incorporated, pursuant to
a strategic alliance entered into on May 22, 1998 (see Note 2 of
the Notes to Financial Statements). All subsequent references to
"Notes" refer o the Notes To Financial Statements located in Item
8, found elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

Olympus owns a 50.1 percent interest and we own a 49.9
percent interest in each joint venture. The first two joint
ventures were formed on September 30, 1998 and the third was
formed in the third quarter of 1999. One joint venture was
expanded to encompass a new project during the fourth quarter of
1999. See Note 4, for financial information about our
unconsolidated affiliates.

Barton Creek Joint Venture
The first joint venture involved our sale of the Wimberly
Lane tract (formerly called ABC West Phase I subdivision tract)
in Barton Creek, to the Oly Stratus Barton Creek I Joint Venture
(Barton Creek Joint Venture) (formerly the Oly Stratus ABC West I
Joint Venture) on September 30, 1998. The Barton Creek Joint
Venture agreed to
8

pay $3.3 million for the 28-acre tract. We
received $2.1 million, a note for $1.2 million and made an equity
contribution of $0.5 million upon formation of the joint venture.
In November 1998, as manager of the project, we arranged a $3.9
million project loan for the joint venture. The assets held in
the joint venture secured the loan. We were also required, as
additional collateral for the loan, to deposit $0.5 million with
the bank in a restricted account until the loan was repaid in its
entirety. Initial borrowings on the project loan were used to
reimburse us $1.9 million for costs incurred on the development
prior to the formation of the joint venture. Subsequent
borrowings were used to complete the project. During the first
quarter of 1999, as developer, we completed the development of 75
residential lots. As manager, we have been marketing and selling
these 75 lots during 1999. As of December 31, 1999, 42 of the
residential lots have been sold and funded. The joint venture
used proceeds from these sales to repay all outstanding
borrowings on the project loan, which required the bank to
release the $0.5 million restricted deposit. We received a
development fee for completing the project and receive
commissions for the lot sales. We anticipate all of the remaining
lots owned by the joint venture will be sold by no later than the
end of 2000. The proceeds from these future lot sales will be
used in the development of the 54 lots recently added to the
joint venture, as more fully explained below.

In December 1999, we sold 174 acres of land encompassing 54
platted lots within the Barton Creek community near Austin, Texas
to the Barton Creek Joint Venture for $11.0 million. Upon closing
of the sale we received $6.0 million and a $5.0 million note. We
deferred our ownership interest in the $11.0 million of sales
proceeds, or $5.5 million, and the related gain of $6.0 million,
or $3.0 million. We will recognize these deferred amounts and the
note will be paid as the lots are developed and sold to third
parties. The 54 lots are currently being developed and will
average over 3 acres in size, which will make these lots the
largest homesites developed to date within the Barton Creek
community. All of these lots have scenic hill country settings
and some will overlook the new Tom Fazio-designed "Fazio Canyons"
golf course. The lots are being developed pursuant to the City's
more restrictive development requirments and could be completed as
early as the second quarter of 2000. The development of these
lots will be funded primarily through the initial equity
contributions of the partners and proceeds from sales of the
remaining lots at the Wimberly Lane section of the Barton Creek
Joint Venture (see above).

Walden Partnership
The second joint venture, also formed on September 30, 1998,
involved us acquiring a 49.9 percent interest in the Oly Walden
General Partnership (the Walden Partnership), which owns the
Walden on Lake Houston project in Houston, Texas that Olympus
purchased in April 1998. We have managed this project on
Olympus' behalf under the terms of a management agreement since
April 1998. We paid $2.0 million for our share of the Walden
Partnership, borrowing funds available to us under the $10
million convertible debt facility with Olympus (see Note 2). We
will continue to manage this property, which at December 31,
1999, included approximately 590 developed lots and 80 acres of
platted but undeveloped real estate, and will receive management
fees and commissions for our services. During the second quarter
of 1998, we negotiated agreements with homebuilders providing for
the sale of approximately 90 percent of the developed lots at
that time. These agreements require the purchasers to close on
the lots pursuant to a specific schedule that extends through
2002. As of December 31, 1999, approximately 340 lots have
already closed and funded under these agreements. The Walden
Partnership has an $8.2 million project loan, which is
nonrecourse to the partners and is secured by the assets of the
project. We were also required to make a restricted cash deposit
of $2.5 million as additional collateral for the loan, of which
$1.5 million was still restricted at December 31, 1999.

7000 West
On August 16, 1999, we sold Olympus a 50.1 percent interest
in a 70,000 square foot office building, which is the first phase
of the 140,000 square foot Lantana Corporate Center (7000 West).
Upon closing we received $1.1 million and recognized a $0.5
million gain. We deferred our retained interest, or $0.5
million, of the sales proceeds and related gain resulting from
the sale of the 5.5 acres of commercial real estate associated
with Phase I of the project to the joint venture. As developer,
we completed construction on the first building in November 1999
and as manager we have secured signed lease agreements which have
fully occupied the building. We are proceeding with construction
on the second 70,000 square foot office building. We anticipate
closing a transaction with Olympus for the sale of the 5.5 acres
of commercial real estate associated with Phase II, which will be
substantially the same as the Phase I transaction. Funds for the
construction of the first building at 7000 West were provided by
the $6.6 million project loan, which we arranged in April 1999.
The 18-month, variable rate, nonrecourse loan is secured by the
11 acres of land at 7000 West, related improvements and
approximately $2.0 million of utility infrastructure
reimbursements due from the City of Austin (the City) for the
Lantana pump station. This loan is being amended to provide an
additional $7.7 million for construction of the second building.
The amended loan will no longer require our $2.0 million
receivable from the City as security.
9


Other Development Activities
Development is progressing at several sections of the Barton
Creek community, including the completion of utility
infrastructure that will serve a significant portion of the 2,300
acres of undeveloped property at Barton Creek, and preliminary
development of approximately 200 new single-family homesites
surrounding the new Tom Fazio-designed "Fazio Canyons" golf
course, which was completed in September 1999. We expect that a
number of these homesites could be available for sale by late
2000. However, permitting and entitlement issues now being
litigated make the timing of completion of the projects at Barton
Creek uncertain.

Results Of Operations
Summary operating results follow (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
------- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues
Undeveloped properties
Unrelated parties $ 3,024 $ 1,016 $ 13,230
Olympus 6,020 1,651 -
Recognition of deferred revenues 904 - -
------- -------- --------
Total undeveloped properties 9,948 2,667 13,230
Developed properties 3,371 14,457 17,723
Commissions, management fees and other 1,357 466 -
------- -------- --------
Total revenues 14,676 17,590 30,953
------- -------- --------

Operating income (loss) 3,350a,b (572)a,b 3,907a
Net income (loss) 2,871 (2,638) 7,006c

</TABLE>

a. Includes reimbursement of infrastructure cost expensed in
prior years of $2.8 million in 1999, $0.8 million in 1998 and
$3.1 million in 1997.
b. Includes $3.5 million of recognized gains associated with
transactions involving the 7000 West and Barton Creek Joint Ventures
in 1999 and a $0.6 million recognized gain in 1998 from the
formation of the Barton Creek Joint Venture.
c. Includes a $4.5 million gain from sale of oil and gas
property interests.

Our undeveloped property revenues include both sales of
undeveloped properties to third parties and the recognition of
previously deferred revenues from the sale of undeveloped real
estate to our unconsolidated affiliates. When we sell real estate
to an entity that we own jointly with Olympus, we defer
recognizing the portion of the revenue from the sale related to
our interest until all or a portion of the real estate is
ultimately sold to unrelated parties. Our 1999 undeveloped
property revenues to unrelated parties included (1) the sale of
44 acres of residential property in Houston, (2) the sale of 34
acres of multi-family real estate in San Antonio and (3) the sale
of 8 acres of multi-family real estate in Dallas. Sales of real
estate to joint ventures with Olympus included the sale of 174
acres of residential property to the Barton Creek Joint Venture
and the sale of 5.5 acres of commercial real estate to the 7000
West Joint Venture (see "Joint Ventures with Olympus Real Estate
Corporation" above). Our recognition of deferred revenues
resulted from the sale of 42 Wimberly Lane developed lots by the
Barton Creek Joint Venture. Sales of 75 single-family homesites
represent our 1999 developed property revenues.

By comparison, our 1998 undeveloped real estate sales to
unrelated parties included the sale of 2 acres of commercial
real estate in Dallas, 27 acres of residential property in San
Antonio and 17 acres of residential property in Barton Creek. Our
Olympus revenues resulted from the sale of 28 acres of Barton
Creek residential real estate to the Barton Creek Joint Venture,
of which $1.6 million was originally deferred. Our 1998 developed
property revenues resulted from the sale of 213 single-family
homesites. Our 1997 undeveloped revenues include the sale of 72
acres of commercial and multi-family real estate. Developed
property revenues during 1997 resulted from the sale of 198
single-family homesites and 46 acres of residential real estate.

Increased commissions, management fees and other revenues
reflect our effort to expand that part of our business through
our role as manager in the joint ventures with Olympus, as well
as our management of the 2,200 acre Lakeway project near Austin.

Costs of sales were $7.8 million in 1999, $14.1 million in
1998 and $24.3 million in 1997. The decrease in 1999 from 1998
primarily reflects the substantial reduction in sales,
particularly those related to the sales of developed lots.
Additionally, reimbursements of certain infrastructure costs,
which were previously charged to expense or related to properties
previously sold, reduced cost of sales by $2.8 million in 1999,
$0.8 million in 1998 and $3.1 million in 1997.
10

Our general and administrative expenses totaled $3.5
million in 1999, $4.0 million in 1998 and $2.8 million during
1997. The variances between the respective years primarily are
the result of legal expenses. Legal expenses totaled $0.8 million
in 1999, $1.5 million in 1998, and $0.6 million in 1997. Our
legal costs primarily represent our ongoing efforts to resolve
through litigation attempts by the City and others to restrict
our development entitlements and to secure reimbursements from
the City of approximately $22 million, of which our share is
approximately $18 million, relating to the infrastructure costs
incurred in the development of the Circle C property which was
annexed by the City. In the fourth quarter of 1999, we received
partial payments totaling $10.3 million related to our Circle C
claim from the City (see "Capital Resources and Liquidity"). In
December 1998, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral argument on a
case that may resolve various issues between the City and us. A
ruling could be issued at any time. Lower legal costs during 1999
reflect the reduced litigation activity. See Item 3, "Legal
Proceedings" for further discussion concerning our legal matters.
Additionally, the increase in expenses during 1999 and 1998
reflect increased charges for general and administrative expense
relating to services provided by an affiliated services company
(see Note 8).

In September 1997, we sold several working interests and
numerous overriding royalty interests in oil and gas properties,
which we had held since our formation, to McMoRan Oil & Gas Co.
and Phosphate Resource Partners Limited Partnership. We received
$4.5 million from the sale, which resulted in a gain of $4.5
million. At the time of the sale, we were affiliates of McMoRan
Oil & Gas and Phosphate Resource Partners because Freeport-
McMoRan Inc., our former managing general partner (see Note 1),
held a similar role with Phosphate Resource Partners and because
we shared common management and a common director with McMoRan
Oil & Gas. These interests had no cost basis and represented all
of our remaining oil and gas interests. The gain is reflected in
Other Income, which also includes royalty income generated by
these properties prior to the sale totaling $0.8 million for
1997.

Net interest expense totaled $0.8 million in 1999, $2.0
million in 1998 and $2.2 million in 1997. The decrease
represents our repayment of debt over the three-year period
resulting in lower average debt outstanding in each of the three
years. Capitalized interest totaled $1.2 million in 1999, $0.4
million in 1998 and $1.4 million in 1997.

We are continually evaluating the development potential of
our properties and will continue to consider opportunities to
enter into significant transactions involving our properties. As
a result, and because of numerous other factors affecting our
business activities as described herein, our past operating
results are not necessarily indicative of our future results.

Capital Resources And Liquidity
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $20.6
million in 1999, $11.1 million in 1998 and $29.5 million in 1997.
The increase in 1999 compared to 1998 resulted primarily from our
receipt of $10.3 million from the City as partial payment of our
Circle C reimbursement claims (see below and Item 3, "Legal
Proceedings"). The increase also reflects our receipt of
previously expensed infrastructure cost reimbursements totaling
$2.8 million during 1999 compared to $0.8 million for similar
reimbursements in 1998. The increase was partially offset by the
decrease in sales revenues during 1999. The decrease in the 1998
amount from 1997 primarily reflects a substantial decrease in our
sales of undeveloped properties. Operating cash flows in 1997
include the $4.5 million gain on the sale of oil and gas
properties (see discussion in "Results of Operations" above) and
$3.1 million for reimbursement of previously expensed
infrastructure costs.

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $8.9 million
in 1999, $8.8 million in 1998 and $9.5 million in 1997. Investing
activities for all three years reflect real estate and facilities
capital expenditure payments, net of any related capitalized
municipal utility district (MUD) reimbursements. In addition,
1999 investing activities included a $0.4 million additional
investment in the Walden Partnership. Our 1998 investing
activities include a $2.5 million investment in two joint
ventures (see "Joint Ventures with Olympus" above and Note 4).
Real estate and facility capital expenditures have generally
decreased, reflecting the constraints on our development
activities resulting from disputes with the City and others.
Additionally, our joint ventures' capital expenditures are not
reflected directly in the accompanying financial statements, as
the joint ventures' results are presented using the equity method
of accounting.

Financing activities provided (used) cash totaling ($12.9)
million in 1999, $2.1 million in 1998 and $(21.2) million in
1997. We reduced our net outstanding borrowings by $12.6 million
in 1999, $7.9 million in 1998 and $21.2 million in 1997. Our net
reductions in outstanding borrowings included proceeds of $0.4
million during 1999 and $2.0 million during 1998 from borrowings
on our convertible debt facility with Olympus (see Note 2).
Additionally, our financing activities during 1998 reflect $10.0
million from the issuance of mandatorily redeemable preferred
stock (see Note 3). The mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
proceeds were used to reduce outstanding bank debt, and the
convertible debt proceeds were used to fund our investment in the
Walden Partnership (see Note 4).
11

Sales, limited development activities and the receipt of the
partial payment of our Circle C infrastructure reimbursements
enabled us to generate operating cash flows during the three
years ended December 31, 1999. We used these operating cash
flows to reduce our outstanding debt from $58.3 million at
December 31, 1996 to $16.6 million at December 31, 1999.
Historically, our funding needs were met largely from borrowings
under a revolving credit facility and term loan, which provided
for an aggregate $35 million of available proceeds through
December 31, 1999. This facility was replaced with a new facility
in December 1999 (see below and Note 5).

In December 1999, we established a new bank credit facility
with Comerica Bank-Texas, which provides for a term loan and a
revolving line of credit. We borrowed $20 million under the term
loan portion of the facility and used the proceeds to repay all
outstanding borrowings under our previous credit facility. This
debt retirement removed all third party guarantees of our
indebtedness (see Note 5). The new facility also makes available
to us up to an additional $10 million of borrowings under a
revolving line of credit. Our outstanding borrowings on the term
loan totaled $13.9 million at December 31, 1999. There were no
borrowings on the revolving line of credit as of December 31,
1999. We also have $2.7 million of outstanding borrowings on our
convertible debt facility with Olympus (see Note 2).

The new credit facility requires that we reduce the
outstanding balance of the term loan by at least $2.5 million in
2000 and by an additional $5.0 million prior to December 21,
2001. The debt will mature in December 2002, subject to our
option to extend the debt through December 2003. We have already
exceeded our year 2000 repayment obligation by reducing the
outstanding borrowings on the term loan by approximately $6.1
million, as further explained below. We are also required to
deposit funds into an interest reserve account with the bank.
The amount in this account must be sufficient to carry the debt
service for both the term loan and the revolving line of credit
for the ensuing twelve month period, adjusted quarterly. At
December 31, 1999, the amount included in the interest reserve
account totaled approximately $2 million. We can fund this
amount directly or it can be treated as a reduction of our
availability under the revolving line of credit. At December 31,
1999, the interest reserve requirement reduced our amount
available under the revolving line of credit to $8 million. We
subsequently funded $1.5 million to the interest reserve account
using proceeds from operations thereby increasing our
availability to $9.5 million under the revolving line of credit.

On October 29, 1999, the City agreed to pay us $9.8 million,
including interest of $1 million, as partial payment of our
Circle C MUD reimbursements. We have received a total of $10.3
million of partial payments from the City on our Circle C MUD
reimbursement claim through December 31, 1999. We received an
additional $0.3 million partial payment in January 2000. We used
all proceeds received to reduce our outstanding borrowings under
the applicable credit facilities at the time of the receipts.
Under certain conditions we could be required to return these
proceeds to the City. In this event, the City would be required
to return our Circle C utility infrastructure, and we would
reassert our claims related to the partial payments. Accordingly,
these proceeds have been classified on our balance sheet as
_other liabilities._ We are continuing to pursue the approximate
$9 million remaining on our Circle C MUD claims. See Item 3,
_Legal Proceedings_ and Notes 6 and 10 for additional information
concerning our Circle C MUD claims and the City's partial
payments.

In December 1999, we sold 174 acres of land encompassing 54
platted lots within the Barton Creek community near Austin,
Texas., to the Barton Creek Joint Venture owned 50.1 percent by
Olympus and 49.9 percent by us (see "Joint Ventures with Olympus
Real Estate Corporation," above and Note 4). We sold the land for
$11.0 million, receiving $6.0 million and a $5.0 million note.
We used the proceeds to reduce borrowings under the term loan
with Comerica Bank-Texas (see above).

We have pursued various financing arrangements available
through our relationship with Olympus. On September 30, 1998, the
Walden Partnership, an unconsolidated subsidiary in which we own
49.9 percent, (see "Joint Ventures with Olympus Real Estate
Corporation" above and Note 4), entered into an $8.2 million
project loan agreement with a commercial bank to fund the
remaining development of the Walden on Lake Houston project. The
three-year, variable rate loan is secured by the assets of the
Walden Partnership and is nonrecourse to the partners. In
addition, we secured the loan with a restricted cash deposit
(see discussion below). Interest is payable monthly and is based
on the bank's prime rate or the LIBOR rate at the Walden
Partnership's option. On October 1, 1998, the Walden Partnership
borrowed $6.1 million on this loan and used the proceeds to repay
its outstanding bank debt associated with land acquisition and
development costs incurred on the project. At December 31, 1999
outstanding borrowings on this project loan totaled $3.6 million.

In November 1998, the Barton Creek Joint Venture (see "Joint
Ventures with Olympus Real Estate Corporation" above), closed on
a $3.9 million project development loan facility with the same
bank as the Walden Partnership loan. The three-year, variable
rate loan was secured by the assets of the Barton Creek Joint
Venture and was nonrecourse to the partners. In addition, the
loan was secured by cash (see discussion below). Upon closing of
the
12

project loan we were reimbursed $1.9 million for previously
incurred development costs associated with the project and
certain Travis County fiscal deposits. All outstanding borrowings
under this project loan have been repaid and we have terminated
the facility.

In April 1999, we and one of our wholly owned subsidiaries
finalized a $6.6 million project development loan facility with
Comerica Bank-Texas for the development of the first 70,000
square foot office building at the 140,000 square foot Lantana
Corporate Center (7000 West). We guaranteed the completion of the
project and we are responsible for any unpaid interest and
certain other limited obligations. The 18-month, variable rate,
nonrecourse loan is secured by approximately 11 acres of real
estate at 7000 West, the related improvements and approximately
$2.0 million of reimbursements due from the City for the Lantana
water pump station. In August 1999, as part of the joint venture
agreement with Olympus, we sold a 50.1 percent interest in the
subsidiary that held the project loan. Accordingly, the project
loan is no longer consolidated in our financial statements and is
now recorded by the joint venture (see "Joint Ventures with
Olympus Real Estate Corporation", above and Note 4). At December
31, 1999 outstanding borrowings on this project loan totaled $4.6
million. This project loan is being amended to provide an
additional $7.7 million for construction of the second 70,000
square foot office building and the release of the lien on the
$2.0 million receivable from the City.

The Walden Partnership and Barton Creek Venture loan
agreements required a cash deposit as additional collateral for
the respective loans. As required under the loan agreements, one
of our wholly owned subsidiaries deposited a total of $3.0
million with the bank. The Walden Partnership loan agreement
provides that the restricted cash balance ($2.5 million) may be
reduced by $0.30 for every $1.00 in principal reduction. The
Barton Creek Joint Venture loan's restricted cash requirement
($0.5 million) was eliminated because we repaid all our
outstanding borrowings under the facility. Olympus has agreed to
pay us interest at 12 percent per annum for their 50 percent
share of such restricted cash, net of related interest earned.
At December 31, 1999 we had $1.5 million of restricted cash
deposited with the bank for the Walden Partnership facility.

Our future operating cash flows and, ultimately, our ability
to develop our properties and expand our business will largely
depend on the level of our real estate sales. In turn, these
sales will be significantly affected by future real estate
values, regulatory issues, development costs, interest rate
levels and our ability to continue to protect our land use and
development entitlements. Significant development expenditures
remain for our Austin-area properties prior to their eventual
sale. We anticipate 2000 capital expenditures will be limited to
essential levels as we work to preserve our land use and related
rights in various disputes with the City and others, as more
fully explained in Item 3, "Legal Proceedings." We believe our
near-term capital resource needs can be met adequately during
2000 from operating cash flows and borrowings under our revolving
line of credit. We are able to obtain up to $37.2 million in
additional capital from Olympus for the development of existing
properties in which we desire third-party equity participation.
However, while financing for development of our existing
properties is available, obtaining land acquisition financing is
generally expensive and uncertain.

Impact Of Year 2000 Compliance
The Year 2000 (Y2K) issue is the result of computerized
systems being written to store and process the year portion of
dates using two digits rather than four. To date, all of our
systems have continued to operate without disruption related to
Y2K. We will continue to closely monitor areas of particular
risk including our business partners' ability to continue to meet
their commitments throughout the year. The incremental costs
associated with our Y2K efforts totaled less than $0.1 million
through 1999 and we do not expect to incur any additional costs.

Disclosures About Market Risks
We derive our revenues from the management, development and
sale of our real estate holdings. Our net income can vary
significantly with fluctuations in the market prices of real
estate, which are influenced by numerous factors, including
interest rate levels. Changes in interest rates also affect
interest expense on our debt. At the present time we do not
hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates. Based on
December 31, 1999 outstanding bank debt and interest rates, a
change of 100 basis points in applicable annual interest rates
would have an approximate $0.1 million impact on year 2000 net
income.

Environmental
Increasing emphasis on environmental matters is likely to
result in additional costs. Our future operations may require
substantial capital expenditures, which could adversely affect
the development of our properties and results of operations.
Additional cost will be charged against our operations in future
periods when such costs can be reasonably estimated. We cannot at
this time accurately predict the cost associated with future
environment obligations.
13

Cautionary Statement
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations and Disclosures about Market Risks
contains forward-looking statements regarding future
reimbursement for infrastructure costs, future events related to
financing and the anticipated outcome of the litigation and
regulatory matters, the expected results of our business
strategy, and other plans and objectives of management for future
operations and activities. Important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from our expectations include
economic and business conditions, business opportunities that may
be presented to and pursued by us, changes in laws or regulations
and other factors, many of which are beyond our control and other
factors that are described in more detail under Item 1,
"Cautionary Statements."
14

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT

Stratus Properties Inc. (Stratus) is responsible for the
preparation of the financial statements and all other information
contained in this Annual Report. The financial statements have
been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles and include amounts that are based on management's
informed judgments and estimates.

Stratus maintains a system of internal accounting controls
designed to provide reasonable assurance at reasonable costs that
assets are safeguarded against loss or unauthorized use, that
transactions are executed in accordance with management's
authorization and that transactions are recorded and summarized
properly. The system is tested and evaluated on a regular basis
by Stratus' internal auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. In
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, Stratus'
independent public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP, have
developed an overall understanding of our accounting and
financial controls and have conducted other tests as they
consider necessary to support their opinion on the financial
statements.

The Board of Directors, through its Audit Committee composed
solely of non-employee directors, is responsible for overseeing
the integrity and reliability of Stratus' accounting and financial
reporting practices and the effectiveness of its system of
internal controls. Arthur Andersen LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP meet regularly with, and have access to, this committee, with and
without management present, to discuss the results of their audit work.

William H. Armstrong III
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

TO THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF STRATUS PROPERTIES
INC.:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Stratus
Properties Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) as of December 31, 1999
and 1998, and the related statements of operations, cash flow and
changes in stockholders' equity for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1999. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of Stratus Properties Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and
the results of its operations and its cash flow for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1999 in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
Austin, Texas
January 19, 2000
15

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
BALANCE SHEETS

December 31,
-----------------------
1999 1998
--------- ---------
(In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents, including
restricted cash of $2.1 million and
$2.8 million at December 31, 1999 and 1998,
respectively, (Notes 4 and 5) $ 3,964 $ 5,169
Accounts receivable:
Property sales 149 525
Other 1,160 408
Prepaid expenses 375 361
--------- ---------
Total current assets 5,648 6,463
Real estate and facilities, net (Note 6) 91,664 96,556
Investments in and advances to
unconsolidated affiliates (Note 4) 7,254 2,468
Other assets, including related party
receivable (Note 4) 11,106 6,342
--------- ---------
Total assets $ 115,672 $ 111,829
========= =========

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 900 $ 583
Accrued interest, property taxes and other 1,537 1,861
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities 2,437 2,444
Long-term debt (Note 5) 16,562 29,178
Other liabilities 19,833 6,238
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock (Note 3) 10,000 10,000
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.01, 50,000,000
shares authorized, and unissued - -
Common stock, par value $0.01, 150,000,000 shares
authorized, 14,288,270 issued and outstanding 143 143
Capital in excess of par value of common stock 176,447 176,447
Accumulated deficit (109,750) (112,621)
--------- ---------
Total stockholders equity 66,840 63,969
--------- ---------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 115,672 $ 111,829
========= =========

</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
16

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
(In Thousands, Except Per
Share Amounts)

<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues $ 14,676 $ 17,590 $ 30,953
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 7,819 14,118 24,294
General and administrative expenses 3,507 4,044 2,752
-------- -------- --------
Total costs and expenses 11,326 18,162 27,046
-------- -------- --------
Operating income (loss) 3,350 (572) 3,907
Other income, net 133 66 5,375
Interest expense, net (789) (2,019) (2,181)
-------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes,
equity in unconsolidated affiliates
and minority interest 2,694 (2,525) 7,101
Income tax provision (130) (87) (80)
Equity in unconsolidated affiliates
income (loss) 307 (26) -
Minority interest in net income of
the Partnership - - (15)
-------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) $ 2,871 $ (2,638) $ 7,006
======== ======== ========
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic $0.20 $(0.18) $0.49
===== ====== =====
Diluted $0.18 $(0.18) $0.48
===== ====== =====

Average shares outstanding:
Basic 14,288 14,288 14,288
====== ====== ======
Diluted 16,238 14,288 14,517
====== ====== ======

</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(In Thousands)

Capital
in
Excess
Preferred Common of Par Accumulated
Stock Stock Value Deficit Total
-------- ------ --------- ---------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance at January 1, 1997 $ - $ 143 $ 176,445 $ (116,989) $ 59,599
Stock options exercised - - 2 - 2
Net income - - - 7,006 7,006
-------- ------ --------- ---------- --------
Balance at December 31, 1997 - 143 176,447 (109,983) 66,607
Net loss - - - (2,638) (2,638)
-------- ------ --------- ---------- --------
Balance at December 31, 1998 - 143 176,447 (112,621) 63,969
Net income - - - 2,871 2,871
-------- ------ --------- ---------- --------
Balance at December 31, 1999 $ - $ 143 $ 176,447 $ (109,750) $ 66,840
======== ====== ========= ========== ========

</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
17

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

Years Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
1999 1998 1997
-------- -------- --------
(In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 2,871 $ (2,638) $ 7,006
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss)
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 87 76 104
Cost of real estate sales 10,018 14,989 23,729
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated
affiliates (307) 26 -
Minority interest's share of Partnership
net income - - -
(Increase) decrease in working capital:
Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses 600 620 2,582
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities
and other (7) (575) (2,734)
Proceeds from Circle C municipal utility
reimbursement 10,262 - -
Long term receivable and other (2,914) (1,422) (1,183)
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities 20,610 11,076 29,519
-------- -------- --------
Cash flow from investing activities:
Real estate and facilities (8,554) (6,346) (9,547)
Investment in Barton Creek Joint Venture - (494) -
Investment in Oly Walden Partnership (376) (1,999) -
-------- -------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities (8,930) (8,839) (9,547)
-------- -------- --------
Cash flow from financing activities:
Repayment of debt, net (27,118) (9,940) (21,207)
Proceeds from term loan 20,000 - -
Repayments of term loan (6,143) - -
Proceeds from convertible debt facility 376 1,999 -
Proceeds from preferred stock issuance - 10,000 -
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities (12,885) 2,059 (21,207)
-------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents (1,205) 4,296 (1,235)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 5,169 873 2,108
-------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $ 3,964 $ 5,169 $ 873
======== ======== ========

Interest paid $ 1,716 $ 2,338 $ 3,351
======== ======== ========
Income taxes paid (refunded) $ 14 $ (118) $ 220
======== ======== ========

</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
18

STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Accounting. The real estate development and marketing
operations of Stratus Properties Inc. (Stratus) are conducted in
Austin and other urban areas of Texas through its investment in
Stratus Properties Operating Co., a Delaware general partnership
(the Partnership). Prior to December 22, 1997, Stratus owned a
99.8 percent general partnership interest in the Partnership and
Freeport-McMoRan Inc., Stratus' former parent, owned the
remaining 0.2 percent general partnership interest and served as
managing general partner. Freeport-McMoRan had certain rights
regarding the Partnership's operations as long as it guaranteed
any of the Partnership's debt (Note 5). Because of Freeport-
McMoRan's rights, Stratus reflected its investment in the
Partnership under the equity basis of accounting.

On December 22, 1997 Freeport-McMoRan merged into IMC Global
Inc. (the Merger). In connection with the Merger, Freeport-
McMoRan sold its 0.2 percent general partnership interest to
Stratus and a subsidiary of Stratus for $100,000. Stratus also
restructured and consolidated its existing debt in December 1997,
extending its availability until January 1, 2001 and providing
for staged reductions in available credit. IMC Global became
guarantor of this restructured debt in place of Freeport-McMoRan.
As a result of Freeport-McMoRan's sale of its interest and the
replacement of the Freeport-McMoRan guarantee with the IMC Global
guarantee, the accompanying financial statements and related
footnotes reflect the Partnership's financial position and
results of operations under consolidation accounting effective
January 1, 1997.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in these financial statements and accompanying
notes. The more significant estimates include valuation
allowances for deferred tax assets, estimates of future cash
flows from development and sale of real estate properties, and
useful lives for depreciation and amortization. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Highly liquid investments purchased
with a maturity of three months or less are considered cash
equivalents.

Financial Instruments. The carrying amounts of property sales
and other receivables, other current assets, accounts payable and
long-term borrowings reported in the balance sheet approximate
fair value.

Earnings Per Share. Basic net income (loss) per share was
calculated by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common
stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
during the years presented. Diluted net income (loss) per share
of common stock was calculated by dividing net income applicable
to common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the year plus the net effect of dilutive stock
options. Stratus had dilutive options outstanding representing
238,000 shares of common stock in 1999. Additionally, the diluted
net income per share calculations for 1999 assumed the redemption
of Stratus' approximate 1.7 million shares of outstanding
mandatorily reedeemable preferred stock for approximately 1.7
million shares of common stock. Stratus' outstanding convertible
debt, which is convertible into approximately 370,000 shares of
common stock was excluded from the diluted net income per share
calculation for 1999 because of its anti-dilutive effect.
Interest accrued on the convertible debt outstanding totaled
$270,000 during 1999 and there have been no dividends accrued to
date on the mandatorily reedeemable preferred stock.

With respect to 1998, Stratus had options outstanding
representing 275,000 shares of common stock excluded from the
calculation as anti-dilutive considering the loss reported that
year. Stratus' outstanding mandatorily redeemable preferred
stock and outstanding convertible debt were not included in the
1998 computation of diluted net loss per share of common stock
because the conversion of these shares would have decreased the
net loss per share. As a result, the mandatorily redeemable
preferred stock convertible into approximately 1.7 million shares
of common stock and outstanding convertible debt convertible into
282,000 shares of common stock were not included in the 1998
diluted net loss per share calculation. During 1998 there were no
dividends accrued on the mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
and interest expense on the convertible debt totaled $61,000.
19

Stratus had dilutive options outstanding which represented
229,000 shares of common stock included in its 1997 dilutive net
income per share calculation. There was no outstanding
convertible debt or mandatorily reedemable preferred stock during
1997.

Outstanding options to purchase approximately 295,000 shares
of common stock at an average exercise price of $6.14 per share
for both 1999 and 1998 and 235,000 shares of common stock at an
average exercise price of $5.23 per share in 1997 were not
included in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per
share because their exercise prices were greater than the average
market price for the years presented.

Investment in Real Estate. Real estate assets are stated at the
lower of cost or net realizable value and include acreage,
development, construction and carrying costs, and other related
costs through the development stage. Capitalized costs are
assigned to individual components of a project, as practicable,
whereas interest and other common costs are allocated based on
the relative fair value of individual land parcels. Carrying
costs are capitalized on properties currently under active
development. Revenues are recognized when the risks and rewards
of ownership are transferred to the buyer and the consideration
received can be reasonably determined.

When events or circumstances indicate that an asset's
carrying amount may not be recoverable, an impairment test is
performed. If the projected undiscounted cash flow from the
asset does not exceed the carrying amount then a reduction of the
carrying amount of the long-lived asset to fair value is
required. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the
fair value of the asset. Generally, Stratus determines fair
value using valuation techniques such as discounted expected
future cash flows. No impairment losses are reflected in the
accompanying financial statements.

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates. Stratus' investment in
its affiliated 20 percent to 50 percent owned joint ventures and
partnerships are accounted for on the equity method. Currently,
Stratus owns a 49.9 percent interest in all of its investments in
unconsolidated affiliates (see Note 4). Stratus' real estate
sales to these entities are deferred to the extent of its
ownership interest in the unconsolidated affiliate. The deferred
revenues are recognized ratably as the unconsolidated affiliates
sell the real estate to unrelated third parties.

2. Olympus Transaction
On May 22, 1998, Stratus and Olympus Real Estate Corporation
(Olympus), an affiliate of Hicks, Muse, Tate & Furst
Incorporated, formed a strategic alliance to develop certain of
Stratus' existing properties and to pursue new real estate
acquisition and development opportunities. Under the terms of
the agreement, Olympus made a $10 million investment in Stratus
mandatorily redeemable preferred stock, provided a $10 million
convertible debt financing facility to Stratus and agreed to make
available up to $50 million of additional capital representing
its share of direct investments in joint Stratus/Olympus
projects. Olympus has the right to nominate one member or up to
20 percent of Stratus' Board of Directors, whichever is greater.

The $10 million mandatorily redeemable preferred stock was
issued at a stated value of $5.84 per share, the average closing
price of Stratus' common stock during the 30 trading days ended
March 2, 1998. Stratus used the proceeds from the sale of these
securities to repay debt. For further discussion about
mandatorily redeemable preferred stock see Note 3 below.

The $10 million convertible debt facility is available to
Stratus in whole or in part until May 22, 2004 and is intended to
fund Stratus' equity investment in new Stratus/Olympus joint
venture opportunities involving properties not currently owned by
Stratus. On September 30, 1998, Stratus borrowed $2.0 million
under this convertible debt facility to fund its investment in
the Oly Walden General Partnership (Walden Partnership) (see Note
4). During the third quarter of 1999, Stratus borrowed an
additional $0.4 million under the convertible debt facility to
fund its share of an additional capital contribution to the
Walden Partnership. Interest under this facility accrues at 12
percent and is payable quarterly or added to principal at
Olympus' option. Through December 31, 1999, Olympus had elected
to add the interest to principal, resulting in an outstanding
amount on the facility of approximately $2.7 million. Outstanding
principal under the facility is convertible at any time by the
holder into Stratus' common stock at a conversion price of $7.31,
which is 125 percent of the average closing price of Stratus'
common stock during the 30 trading days ended March 2, 1998. If
not converted into common stock, the convertible debt matures on
May 22, 2004. If the combination of interest at 12 percent and
the value of the conversion right does not provide Olympus with
at least a 15 percent annual return on the convertible debt,
Stratus must pay Olympus additional interest upon retirement of
the convertible debt in an amount necessary to yield a 15 percent
annual return. The convertible debt is nonrecourse to Stratus
and will be secured solely by Stratus' interest in
Stratus/Olympus joint venture opportunities financed with the
20

proceeds of the convertible debt.

Through May 22, 2001, Olympus has agreed to make available
up to $50 million, of which it had committed approximately $12.8
million at December 31, 1999, for its share of capital for direct
investments in Stratus/Olympus joint acquisition and development
activities. In return, Stratus has provided Olympus with a right
of first refusal to participate for no less than a 50 percent
interest in all new acquisition and development projects on
properties not currently owned by Stratus, as well as development
opportunities on existing properties in which Stratus seeks
third-party equity participation.

3. Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock
Stratus has outstanding 1,712,328 shares of mandatorily
redeemable preferred stock, stated value of $5.84 per share.
Each share of preferred stock will share dividends and
distributions, if any, ratably with Stratus' common stock. The
preferred stock is redeemable at the holder's option at any time
after May 22, 2001, for cash in an amount per share equal to 95
percent of the average closing price per share of common stock
for the 10 trading days preceding the redemption date (the
"common stock equivalent value") or, at Stratus' option, after
May 22, 2003 for the greater of the common stock equivalent value
or their stated value per share, plus accrued and unpaid
dividends, if any. The preferred stock must be redeemed no later
than May 22, 2004. Stratus has the option to satisfy the
redemption with shares of its common stock on a one-for-one share
basis, subject to certain limitations.

4. Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates
On September 30, 1998, Stratus entered into two separate joint
ventures with Olympus. The first provided for the development of
75 residential lots at the Barton Creek ABC West Phase I
subdivision known as Wimberly Lane. In this transaction Stratus
sold land to the Oly Stratus ABC West I Joint Venture (ABC Joint
Venture), which has subsequently been renamed (see below), for
approximately $3.3 million. Stratus deferred its equity interest
in the sale, or $1.65 million, for financial accounting purposes,
which will be recognized ratably as the developed lots are sold
to unrelated third parties. Upon closing, Stratus received $2.1
million and a $1.2 million note and invested approximately $0.5
million in the now fully developed project. The second
transaction involved approximately 700 developed lots and 80
acres of platted but undeveloped real estate at the Walden on
Lake Houston project (Walden). Olympus originally purchased
Walden in April 1998 when it contained 930 developed lots and 80
acres of undeveloped property. Stratus has served as manager of
this project since Olympus' purchase. Stratus acquired its
interest in the Walden Partnership for $2.0 million the funds of
which were borrowed under its convertible debt facility with
Olympus (see Note 2). On September 30, 1999, Stratus borrowed an
additional $0.4 million under the convertible debt facility to
fund its share of an additional capital contribution to the
Walden Partnership. Stratus accounts for its investment in both
of these affiliated entities using the equity method.

Stratus, as manager of the both the Walden Partnership and
the ABC Joint Venture, negotiated project development loan
facilities for both joint ventures with the same commercial bank.
These facilities, totaling $8.2 million for the Walden
Partnership and $3.9 million for the ABC Joint Venture, are
nonrecourse to the partners and are secured by the assets of the
respective projects. At December 31, 1999, borrowings of $3.6
million were outstanding on the Walden facility. The ABC Joint
Venture repaid all its outstanding obligations under its facility
and has terminated the related bank commitment. These facilities
required that a wholly owned subsidiary of Stratus deposit a
total of $3.0 million of restricted cash with the bank as
additional collateral for these facilities. The loan agreement
for the Walden Partnership permits a $0.30 reduction of this
restricted cash deposit for every $1.00 of principal repaid on
the Walden Partnership loan. The restriction on the $0.5 million
deposited as collateral for the ABC Joint Venture loan has been
removed because the loan has been repaid. At December 31, 1999,
Stratus had approximately $1.5 million of restricted cash
associated solely with the Walden Partnership facility agreement.

On August 16, 1999, Stratus sold Olympus a 50.1 percent
interest in a 70,000 square foot office building, which is the
first phase of the 140,000 square foot Lantana Corporate Center
(7000 West). Stratus received $1.1 million upon closing and
recognized a $0.5 million gain. Stratus deferred its retained
interest, or $0.5 million, of the sales proceeds and related gain
resulting from the sale of the 5.5 acres of commercial real
estate associated with phase I of the project. As developer,
Stratus completed construction on the first building in November
1999 and as manager has secured signed lease agreements which
have fully occupied the building. Stratus is proceeding with
construction on the second 70,000 square foot office building.
Stratus anticipates the remaining 5.5 acres of commercial real
estate associated with phase II of the project will be sold to
Olympus in a similar transaction in 2000. Funds for the
construction of the first building at 7000 West were provided by
a $6.6
21

million project loan that Stratus negotiated in April
1999. The 18-month variable rate, nonrecourse loan is secured by
the 11 acres of land at 7000 West, related improvements and
approximately $2.0 million of reimbursements due from the City of
Austin (the City) for the Lantana pump station. This project loan
facility is in the process of being amended to provide an
additional $7.7 million of availability. Stratus accounts for its
investment in this joint venture using the equity method.

In December 1999, Stratus sold 174 acres of land
encompassing 54 platted lots within the Barton Creek community
near Austin, Texas to the ABC Joint Venture for $11 million. The
ABC Joint Venture was formed in September 1998 to develop and
sell other lots at the Wimberly Lane development within the
Barton Creek community (see above). The name of the joint venture
was changed and future references to it will reflect its new
name, Oly Stratus Barton Creek I Joint Venture (Barton Creek
Joint Venture). Upon the closing of the sale, Stratus received
$6.0 million and a $5.0 million note. Stratus deferred its
ownership interest in the $11.0 million of proceeds, or $5.5
million, and the related gain of $6.0 million, or $3.0 million.
Stratus will recognize these deferred amounts and the note will
be paid as the lots are developed and sold to unrelated third
parties. Sales of lots from the Wimberly Lane section of the
Barton Creek Joint Venture together with the initial equity
contributions of the partners are expected to fund the
construction of these lots. Stratus, as manager of the project,
sold 42 of the 75 developed lots at the Wimberly Lane portion of
the Barton Creek Joint Venture during 1999.

The Barton Creek Joint Venture distributed approximately
$0.4 million to the partners during 1999. Stratus recorded its
portion of the distribution, $0.2 million, as a reduction of its
$1.2 million note received from the initial sale of the 28 acres
to the Barton Creek Joint Venture. There have been no
distributions received from the Walden Partnership or 7000 West
since their formation. The summarized unaudited financial
information of Stratus' unconsolidated affiliates is shown below
as of December 31, 1999 and for the year then ended and as of
December 31, 1998 and the period from inception (September 30,
1998) to December 31, 1998 (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Barton Creek Walden 7000
Joint Venture Partnership West Total
------------- ----------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Earnings data (year ended
December 31, 1999):
Revenue $ 4,446 $ 2,833 $ 21 $ 7,300
Operating income (loss) 1,039 (510) (83) 446
Net income (loss) 1,039 (485) (74) 480
Stratus' equity in net
income (loss) 518 (174)a (37) 307

Balance sheet data
(at December 31, 1999):
Current assets 2,328 1,207 1,069 4,604
Real estate and facilities, net 15,880 8,788 7,584 32,252
Total assets 18,482 10,094 8,999 37,575
Current liabilities 261 2,722 773 3,756
Total liabilities 12,180 9,355b 5,637 27,172
Net assets 6,302 740 3,362 10,404
Stratus' equity in net assets 3,145 369 1,678 5,192

Earnings data (inception to
December 31, 1998):
Revenue - 875 - 875
Operating loss - (75) - (75)
Net loss - (51) - (51)
Stratus' equity in net loss - (26) - (26)

Balance sheet data (at
December 31, 1998):
Current assets 21 726 - 747
Real estate and facilities, net 4,666 9,859 - 14,525
Total assets 4,687 10,662 - 15,349
Current liabilities 103 2,298 - 2,401
Total liabilities 3,698 9,630c - 13,328
Net assets 989 600 - 1,589
Stratus' equity in net assets 494 299 - 793


</TABLE>
22
a. Includes recognition of $67,000 of a total $337,000 of
deferred income, representing the difference in Stratus'
investment in the Walden Partnership and its underlying equity
at the date of acquisition. Stratus will recognize the
remaining difference as the related real estate is sold.
b. Includes a $2.1 million note payable to Stratus.
c. Includes a $1.7 million note payable to Stratus.

5. Long-Term Debt

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
---------------------
1999 1998
-------- ---------
(In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Bank credit facility and term loan,
average rate 5.6% in 1999 and 6.0% in 1998 $ - $ 27,118
Comerica term loan, average rate 9.5 % 13,857 -
Convertible debt facility with Olympus,
average rate 12.0% in 1999 and 1998 (Note 2) 2,705 2,060
-------- ---------
$ 16,562 $ 29,178
======== =========
</TABLE>

Stratus had a commercial bank credit facility that provided
for borrowings of up to $35 million through December 31, 1999. In
December 1999, Stratus negotiated a new facility agreement with
Comerica Bank-Texas. The new facility provides for a $20 million
term loan and a $10 million revolving line of credit (see below).
Stratus borrowed $20 million under the term loan portion of the
facility and used the proceeds to repay all outstanding
borrowings under its previous credit facility, which was then
terminated. This debt retirement of the previous credit facility
removed the IMC Global Inc. guarantee of Stratus' indebtedness
(Note 1). As consideration for IMC Global's guarantee, Stratus
paid IMC Global an annual fee which totaled $0.2 million for both
1999 and 1998.

Interest on the Comerica facility is variable and accrues
at either the lender's prime rate plus 1 percent or LIBOR plus
300 basis points at Stratus' option. The term loan and revolving
line of credit are secured by a lien on all of Stratus' real
property assets, its interests in unconsolidated affiliates and
the future receipt of municipal utility district reimbursements
and other infrastructure receivables. The credit facility also
contains covenants restricting dividends or other distributions,
a change in management, additional debt and certain other
activities. Stratus is also required to deposit funds into an
interest reserve account with the bank. The amount in this
account must be sufficient to carry the debt service for both the
term loan and the revolving line of credit for the ensuing twelve
month period, adjusted quarterly. The amount of the interest
reserve totaled approximately $2.0 million at December 31, 1999.
The amount can be funded directly by Stratus or by reducing
Stratus' availability under the revolving line of credit. At
December 31, 1999, Stratus funded the interest reserve account by
reducing its availability under the revolving line of credit to
$8.0 million. Stratus is also required to reduce the balance on
the term loan by at least $2.5 million in 2000 and an additional
$5.0 million prior to December 21, 2001. Stratus has already met
its repayment commitment for 2000 by repaying $6.1 million prior
to December 31, 1999. The debt will mature in December 2002,
subject to Stratus' option to extend the maturity through
December 2003. As of December 31, 1999, Stratus had no borrowed
funds under the revolving line of credit. At December 31, 1999,
Stratus had deposited $0.6 million within a Comerica restricted
account. Capitalized interest totaled $1.2 million in 1999, $0.4
million in 1998 and $1.4 million in 1997.

6. Real Estate

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
----------------------
1999 1998
--------- ---------
(In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Land held for development or sale:
Austin, Texas area, net of accumulated depreciation
of $209,000 for 1999 and $122,000 for 1998 $ 86,178 $ 87,199
Other areas of Texas 5,486 9,357
--------- ---------
$ 91,664 $ 96,556
========= =========

</TABLE>

Stratus' investment in real estate includes approximately
4,200 acres of land located in Austin, Dallas, Houston and San
Antonio, Texas. The principal holdings of Stratus are located in
the Austin area and consist of approximately 2,300 acres of
undeveloped residential, multi-family and commercial property
within the Barton Creek community. Stratus' remaining Austin
properties include 500 acres of undeveloped residential, multi-
family and commercial property known as the Lantana tract, south
of and adjacent to the Barton Creek
23

community and the approximate
1,300 acres of undeveloped commercial and multi-family property
within the Circle C Ranch development.

Stratus also owns 24 developed lots, 120 acres of
undeveloped residential property and 32 acres of undeveloped
commercial and multi-family residential property located in
Dallas, Houston and San Antonio, Texas. These properties are
being managed and actively marketed by unaffiliated professional
real estate developers. Under the terms of the related
development agreements, the operating expenses and development
costs, net of revenues, are funded by Stratus. The developers
are entitled to a management fee and a 25 percent interest in the
net profits, after Stratus recovers its investment and a stated
rate of return, resulting from the sale of the managed
properties. As of December 31, 1999 no amounts have been paid in
connection with these net profit arrangements.

Various regulatory matters and litigation involving Stratus'
development of its Austin-area properties are summarized below.

The City's WQPZ Action - On January 9, 1998, the City filed suit
in Travis County District Court against 14 WQPZs and their
owners, including the Barton Creek WQPZ, challenging the
constitutionality of the legislation authorizing the creation of
water quality zones. The Attorney General of Texas intervened in
this suit and the Circle C WQPZ litigation, described below, to
join the defense of the legislation. A summary judgment hearing
was conducted in the Travis County District Court on July 9,
1998. The District Court entered an order granting the City's
motion for summary judgment and declaring the WQPZ legislation
unconstitutional. All parties agreed to the form of an order
which permitted an expedited appeal directly to the Texas Supreme
Court. Oral argument was presented to the Texas Supreme Court on
December 9, 1998. A ruling is expected in the near future.

Circle C WQPZ Litigation - Circle C Land Corp., a wholly owned
subsidiary of Stratus, filed a WQPZ (Circle C WQPZ) covering a
portion of the Circle C development, covering 554 acres located
outside the boundaries of any municipal utility district. In
November 1997, Stratus sought a declaratory judgment in the Hays
County District Court to confirm the validity of the Circle C
WQPZ.

On September 4, 1998, the Hays County District Court ruled
that the WQPZ enabling legislation was constitutional and that
the Circle C WQPZ was validly created. The City has appealed the
Hays County District Court's ruling to the Texas Third Court of
Appeals. Both parties submitted briefs and on September 15, 1999
oral argument was presented to the Third Court of Appeals.

The principal issue involved in this case, the
constitutionality of the enabling legislation authorizing the
creation of WQPZs, is already pending before the Texas Supreme
Court in the City's WQPZ action described above and is expected
to be resolved in connection with that case. Assuming the Texas
Supreme Court determines that the enabling legislation is
constitutional, certain important collateral issues are pending
before the Third Court of Appeals. Those issues, which involve
the application of the WQPZ enabling legislation to Stratus' WQPZ
at Circle C, are expected to be resolved in Stratus' favor.

Annexation/Circle C MUD Reimbursement Litigation - On December 19,
1997, the City annexed all land formerly lying within the Circle
C project. If the City's annexation is valid, Stratus' property
located within Circle C's municipal utility districts (MUD) and
annexed by the City is subject to the City's zoning and
development regulations. Additionally, the City is required to
assume all MUD debt and reimburse Stratus for a significant
portion of the costs incurred for water, wastewater and drainage
infrastructure. Because the City failed to pay these costs upon
annexation, as required by statute, Stratus sued the City. The
City paid a portion of Stratus' claim as described in Note 10. A
trial of the balance of Stratus' claim is expected to be set
during the second quarter of 2000.

The City's total reimbursement obligation to the Circle C
developers, resulting from its annexation, is estimated at $22
million, of which Stratus' remaining share is estimated at
approximately $9.0 million, exclusive of penalties and interest.
For a discussion of the City's partial payment of these costs
see Note 10.

During the 1999 legislative session two laws were enacted
enhancing Stratus' MUD reimbursement claim against the City, as
described in "Legislative Matters" below. These laws became
effective on September 1, 1999, and Stratus is accordingly
entitled to penalties and interest on the outstanding delinquent
Circle C MUD reimbursements. Stratus will continue to pursue
this action vigorously.
24

Legislative Matters - In the 1997 Texas State legislative session,
a bill to reorganize a state governmental agency inadvertently
repealed the provisions of law (H.B. 4 and S.B. 1704), that
established grandfathered rights for previously permitted lands.
In response to the legislature's inadvertent repeal, the City
enacted an ordinance establishing regulations on land development that
effectively eliminated the grandfathered rights. The City
has attempted to apply these regulations to portions of Stratus'
Circle C property and Lantana. In response, Stratus undertook to
assert and defend its grandfathered entitlements vigorously. In
April 1999, the Texas State House of Representatives and Senate
overwhelmingly approved H.B. 1704, which reinstated the
grandfathered rights previously inadvertently repealed. This
bill became law effective on May 11, 1999.

Three other laws were enacted during the second quarter of
1999, which are expected to have a positive impact on Stratus'
development rights for its Austin-area properties and strengthen
its position in collecting the Circle C MUD reimbursements
currently being litigated (see "Annexation/Circle C MUD
Reimbursements Suit" above). The three laws enacted are: S.B.
262, which requires a municipality that annexed property in a MUD
to pay penalties and interest on utility infrastructure
reimbursements associated with the annexed properties that are
not timely paid by the municipality; S.B. 1165, which validates
the creation of existing water quality protection zones; and S.B.
89, which requires a municipality to pay developers for utility
infrastructure within a MUD controlled and operated by a
municipality in conjunction with an annexation, regardless of
whether or not the municipality's annexation is ultimately
validated.

7. Income Taxes
Income taxes are recorded pursuant to SFAS 109 "Accounting for
Income Taxes." No benefit has been recognized for any period
presented with respect to Stratus' net deferred assets, as a full
valuation allowance has been provided because of Stratus'
operating history and its expectation of incurring tax losses for
the near future. Therefore the final determination of the gross
deferred tax asset amounts had no impact to Stratus' financial
statements. The components of deferred taxes follow:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31,
---------------------
1999 1998
--------- --------
(In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Net operating losses (expire 2001-2018) $ 14,539 $ 15,079
Real estate and facilities, net 11,192 11,881
Alternative minimum tax credits and
depletion allowance (no expiration) 898 838
Other future deduction carryforwards
(expire 2000-2003) 347 390
Valuation allowance (26,976) (28,188)
--------- --------
$ - $ -
========= ========

Income taxes charged to income follow:


</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

1999 1998 1997
------ ----- -----
(In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Current income tax provision
Federal $ (60) $ - $ -
State (70) (87) (80)
------ ----- -----
(130) (87) (80)
------ ----- -----
Income tax provision $ (130) $ (87) $ (80)
====== ===== =====

</TABLE>

Reconciliations of the differences between the income tax
(charges) benefits computed at the federal statutory tax rate and
the income tax provision recorded follow:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

1999 1998 1997
---------------- -------------- ---------------
Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent
-------- ------- ------ ------- ------- -------
(Dollars In Thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Income tax benefit (expense)
computed at the federal
statutory income tax rate $(1,050) (35)% $ 893 35 % $(2,485) (35)%
Increase (decrease) attributable
to:
Change in valuation allowance 1,212 40 (1,521) (59) 3,168 45
State taxes and other (292) (9) 541 21 (763) (11)
------- ------ ------ ------- ------- ------
Income tax provision $ (130) (4)% $ (87) (3)% $ (80) (1)%

</TABLE>
25

8. Transactions with Affiliates
Management Services. Stratus owns 10 percent of FM Services
Company, which provides certain management and administrative
services to Stratus including technical, administrative,
accounting, financial, tax and other services, under a management
services agreement. Services provided to Stratus prior to January
1, 1998 were at a fixed annual fee of $0.5 million, subject to
annual cost of living increases. Effective January 1, 1998,
pursuant to a new management services agreement services are
provided on a cost reimbursement basis. Fees paid under this
services agreement totaled $0.9 million in 1999 and $1.0 million in
1998. Stratus believes the costs of these services do not differ
materially from those costs that would have been incurred had the
relevant personnel providing these services been employed
directly by Stratus during 1999 and 1998.

Sale of Oil & Gas Interests. In September 1997, Stratus sold
several working interests and numerous overriding royalty
interests in oil and gas properties, which had been held since
its formation, to McMoRan Oil & Gas Co. and Phosphate Resource
Partners Limited Partnership for $4.5 million cash, resulting in
a gain of $4.5 million. Phosphate Resource Partners was an
affiliate because of Freeport-McMoRan's role as administrative
managing general partner of Phosphate Resource Partners prior to
the Merger was similar to the role it had with Stratus (see Note
1). McMoRan Oil & Gas was an affiliate because at that time it
shared common management and a common director with Stratus.
These interests, had no cost basis and represented all of
Stratus' remaining oil and gas interests. The gain is reflected
in Other Income, which also includes royalty income generated by
these properties prior to the sale tthese properties prior to the sale
totaling $0.8 million in 1997.

9. Employee Benefits
Stock Options. Stratus' Stock Option Plan and Stock Option Plan
for Non-Employee Directors (the Plans) provide for the issuance
of up to a total of 1.3 million stock options and stock
appreciation rights at no less than market value at time of
grant. In May 1998, Stratus' shareholders approved the 1998
Stock Option Plan (the 1998 Plan). Under the terms of the 1998
plan Stratus can grant options representing 850,000 shares of
common stock. Generally, stock options are exercisable in 25
percent annual increments beginning one year from the date of
grant and expire 10 years after the date of grant. At December
31, 1999, 406,375 shares were available for new grants under the
Plans and 427,250 were available for grant under the 1998 Plan.
A summary of stock options outstanding, including 150,000 stock
appreciation rights, follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998 1997
------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Average Average Average
Number of Option Number of Option Number of Option
Options Price Options Price Options Price
--------- ------- --------- ------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Beginning of year 1,067,625 $ 3.42 1,050,000 $ 2.98 790,000 $ 2.77
Granted 196,250 3.92 304,000 6.05 280,000 3.55
Exercised - - (50,000) 1.75 (2,500) 1.50
Expired/Forfeited - - (236,375) 5.21 (17,500) 2.64
--------- --------- ---------
End of year 1,263,875 3.50 1,067,625 3.42 1,050,000 2.98
========= ========= =========

</TABLE>

Summary information of fixed stock options outstanding at
December 31, 1999 follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
--------------------- ----------------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Averag Average Average
Number of Remaining Option Number of Option
Range of Exercise Prices Options Life Price Options Price
- ------------------------ --------- ---------- -------- -------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$1.50 to $1.81 280,000 6.0 years $ 1.57 225,000 $ 1.58
$2.63 to $3.91 523,750 8.2 years 3.52 187,500 3.26
$4.03 to $6.19 310,125 8.5 years 6.04 76,750 6.10
--------- --------
1,113,875 489,250
========= ========
</TABLE>

Stratus has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS
123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation," and continues to
apply Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations in
accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Accordingly,
Stratus has recognized no compensation costs associated with its
stock option grants. If Stratus had determined compensation
costs for its stock option grants based on the fair value of the
awards at their grant dates its net income would have decreased
by $752,000 ($0.05 per share) in 1999, its net loss would have
increased by $523,000 ($0.04 per share) in 1998, and its net
income would have decreased by $252,000 ($0.02
26

per share) in
1997. For the pro forma computations, the fair values of the
option grants were estimated on the dates of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. These values totaled $2.75 in
1999, $4.35 per option in 1998 and $2.76 per option in 1997. The
weighted average assumptions used include a risk-free interest
rate of 5.4 percent in 1999, 5.7 percent in 1998 and 6.7 percent
in 1997, expected lives of 10 years and expected volatility of 54
percent in 1999, 55 percent in 1998 and 62 percent in 1997. These
pro forma effects are not necessarily representative of future
years. No other discounts or restrictions related to vesting or
the likelihood of vesting of fixed stock options were applied.

10. Commitments and Contingencies. Stratus has made, and will
continue to make, expenditures at its operations for protection
of the environment. Increasing emphasis on environmental matters
can be expected to result in additional costs, which will be
charged against Stratus' operations in future periods. Present
and future environmental laws and regulations applicable to the
Stratus' operations may require substantial capital expenditures,
could adversely affect the development of its real estate
interests or may affect its operations in other ways that cannot
be accurately predicted at this time.

In late October 1999, Circle C Land Corp., a wholly owned
subsidiary of Stratus, and the City of Austin reached an
agreement regarding a portion of Circle C's claims against the
City. As a result of this agreement, Status received
approximately $9.8 million, including $1.0 million in interest
representing a partial payment of these claims. Stratus has
collected a total of $10.3 million of reimbursement from the City
as of December 31, 1999. Stratus will continue to vigorously
pursue its approximate $9.0 million of remaining claims against
the City. Stratus used the proceeds to reduce its outstanding
debt.

Under the terms of the agreement, Stratus would be required
to return the money to the City and the City would be required to
return the utility infrastructure to Stratus if the City's
annexation of the Circle C municipal utility districts is
reversed or otherwise rescinded, whether by legislative action,
final action of the appellate court, or other legal process. If
the transaction is rescinded, Stratus would pursue its
reimbursement claims for this amount, plus the additional amounts
Stratus considers due from the City, under Texas law. For
further discussion of Stratus' litigation and related
reimbursement issues see Note 6.

Stratus, in connection with the sale of one oil and gas
property in 1993, indemnified the purchaser for any future
abandonment costs in excess of net revenues received by the
purchaser. Stratus accrued $3.0 million relating to this
contingent liability at the time of the purchase, which it
believes to be adequate. The amount is included in Other
Liabilities. Stratus periodically assesses the reasonableness of
amounts recorded for this related liability through the use of
information provided by the operator of the property, including
its net production revenues. The carrying value of this
contingent liability may be adjusted, as additional information
becomes available.

11. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Net Income
Operating Net (Loss) Per Share
Income Income -----------------
Revenues (Loss) (Loss) Basic Diluted
-------- ------- ------- ------ -------
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
1999
1st Quarter $ 1,586 $ (218)a $ (479) $(0.03) $(0.03)
2nd Quarter 2,744 733b 535 0.04 0.03
3rd Quarter 1,828 765c 760 0.05 0.05
4th Quarter 8,518 2,070d 2,055 0.14 0.13
-------- ------- -------
$ 14,676 $ 3,350 $ 2,871 0.20 0.18
======== ======= =======
1998
1st Quarter 2,655 $ (385)e $ (883) $(0.06) $(0.06)
2nd Quarter 3,408 (704) (1,160) (0.08) (0.08)
3rd Quarter 6,239 1,044 566 0.04 0.03
4th Quarter 5,288 (527) (1,161) (0.08) (0.08)
-------- ------- -------
$ 17,590 $ (572) $(2,638) (0.18) (0.18)
======== ======= =======

</TABLE>
27

a. Includes a $0.8 million ($0.06 per share) reimbursement of
previously expensed infrastructure costs.
b. Includes a $2.0 million ($0.12 per share) reimbursement of
previously expensed infrastructure costs.
c. Includes a $0.5 million gain ($0.03 per share)on the sale of
50.1 percent of Phase I of the Lantana Corporate Center to
Olympus Real Estate Corporation in connection with the
formation of the 7000 West Joint Venture (see Note 4).
d. Includes a $3.0 million gain ($0.18 per share) on the sale
of 174 acres to the Barton Creek Joint Venture (see Note 4).
e. Includes a $0.8 million ($0.06 per share) reimbursement of
previously expensed infrastructure costs.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The information set forth under the caption "Information
About Nominees and Directors" of the Proxy Statement submitted to
the stockholders of the registrant in connection with its 2000
annual meeting to be held on May 11, 2000, is incorporated herein
by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information set forth under the captions "Director
Compensation" and "Executive Officer Compensation" of the Proxy
Statement submitted to the stockholders of the registrant in
connection with its 2000 annual meeting to be held on May 11,
2000, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management
The information set forth under the captions "Common Stock
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners" and "Common Stock
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officer" of the Proxy
Statement submitted to the stockholders of the registrant in
connection with its 2000 annual meeting to be held on May 11,
2000, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information set forth under the caption "Certain
Transactions" of the Proxy Statement submitted to the
stockholders of the registrant in connection with its 2000 annual
meeting to be held on May 11, 2000, is incorporated herein by
reference.

PART IV

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on
Form 8-K
(a)(1) Financial Statements. Reference is made to the
Financial Statements beginning on page 16 hereof.

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules. Reference is made to
the Index to Financial Statements appearing on page F-1
hereof.

(a)(3) Exhibits. Reference is made to the Exhibit Index
beginning on page E-1 hereof.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K. The registrant filed a Current
Report on Form 8-K dated December 28, 1999 reporting an event
under Item 5.
28


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, on March 13, 2000.


STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.


By: /s/ William H. Armstrong III
---------------------------
William H. Armstrong III
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
indicated, on March 13, 2000.


/s/ William H. Armstrong III
---------------------------- Chairman of the Board, President
William H. Armstrong III and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive and financial officer)

*
----------------------------
C. Donald Whitmire Vice President and Controller
(principal accounting officer)



*
-----------------------------
Robert L. Adair III Director



*
-----------------------------
James C. Leslie Director



*
-----------------------------
Michael D. Madden Director



*By: /s/ William H. Armstrong III
-----------------------------
William H. Armstrong III
Attorney-in-Fact
S-1

STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of Stratus. Incorporated by reference to Stratus'
Exhibit 3.1 to 1998 Form 10-K.

3.2 By-laws of Stratus, as amended as of February 11,
1999. Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
Stratus' 1998 Form 10-K.

4.1 Stratus' Certificate of Designations of Series A
Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Stratus' 1992 Form 10-K.

4.2 Rights Agreement dated as of May 28, 1992 between
Stratus and Mellon Securities Trust Company, as Rights
Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to
Stratus' 1992 Form 10-K.

4.3 Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement dated as of
April 21, 1997 between Stratus and the Rights Agent.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Stratus'
Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 1997.

4.4 The loan agreement by and between Comerica Bank-
Texas and Stratus Properties Inc., Stratus Properties
Operating Co., L.P., Circle C Land Corp. and Austin 290
Properties Inc. dated December 21, 1999.

4.5 Certificate of Designations of the Series B
Participating Preferred Stock of Stratus Properties
Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Stratus' Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 1998.

4.6 Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of May 22,
1998, by and between Stratus Properties Inc. and
Oly/Stratus Equities, L.P. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to Stratus' Current Report on Form 8-K
dated June 3, 1998.

4.7 Loan Agreement, dated as of May 22, 1998, by and
among Stratus Ventures I Borrower L.L.C., Oly Lender
Stratus, L.P. and Stratus Properties Inc. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Stratus' Current Report
on Form 8-K dated June 3, 1998.

10.1 Amended and Restated Services Agreement, dated as of
December 23, 1997 between FM Services Company and
Stratus. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Stratus' 1997 Form 10-K.

10.2 Joint Venture Agreement between Freeport-McMoRan
Resource Partners, Limited Partnership and the
Partnership, dated June 11, 1992. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Stratus' 1992 Form 10-K.

10.3 Development and Management Agreement dated and
effective as of June 1, 1991 by and between Longhorn
Development Company and Precept Properties, Inc. (the
"Precept Properties Agreement"). Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Stratus' 1992 Form 10-K.

10.4 Assignment dated June 11, 1992 of the Precept
Properties Agreement by and among FTX (successor by
merger to FMI Credit Corporation, as successor by
merger to Longhorn Development Company), the
Partnership and Precept Properties, Inc. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Stratus' 1992 Form 10-K.

10.5 Master Agreement, dated as of May 22, 1998, by and
among Oly Fund II GP Investments, L.P., Oly Lender
Stratus, L.P., Oly/Stratus Equities, L.P., Stratus
Properties Inc. and Stratus Ventures I Borrower L.L.C.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Stratus'
Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 1998.

10.6 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 22,
1998, by and between Oly/Stratus Equities, L.P. and
Stratus Properties Inc. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.2 to Stratus' Current Report on Form 8-K
dated June 3, 1998.

10.7 Oly Stratus Barton Creek I Amended and Restated Joint
Venture Agreement between Oly ABC West I, L.P. and
Stratus ABC West I, L.P. dated December 28, 1999.
E-1

10.8 Amendment No. 1 to the Oly Stratus ABC West I Joint
Venture Agreement dated November 9, 1998. Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Stratus 1998 Third
Quarter 10-Q.

10.9 Management Agreement between Oly Stratus ABC West I
Joint Venture and Stratus Management L.L.C. dated
September 30, 1998. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 to the Stratus 1998 Third Quarter 10-Q.

10.10 Loan Agreement dated September 30, 1998 between
Oly Stratus ABC West I Joint Venture and Oly Lender
Stratus, L.P. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.13 to the Stratus 1998 Third Quarter 10-Q.

10.11 General Partnership Agreement dated April 8, 1998
by and between Oly/Houston Walden, L.P. and Oly/FM
Walden, L.P. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14
to the Stratus 1998 Third Quarter 10-Q.

10.12 Amendment No. 1 to the General Partnership
Agreement dated September 30, 1998 by and among
Oly/Houston Walden, L.P., Oly/FM Walden, L.P. and
Stratus Ventures I Walden, L.P. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Stratus 1998 Third
Quarter 10-Q.

10.13 Development Loan Agreement dated September 30,
1998 by and between Oly Walden General Partnership and
Bank One, Texas, N.A. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.16 to the Stratus 1998 Third Quarter 10-Q.

10.14 Guaranty Agreement dated September 30, 1998 by and
between Oly Walden General Partnership and Bank One,
Texas, N.A. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17
to the Stratus 1998 Third Quarter 10-Q.

10.15 Management Agreement dated April 9, 1998 by and
between Oly/FM Walden, L.P. and Stratus Management,
L.L.C. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to
the Stratus 1998 Third Quarter 10-Q.

10.16 Amended and Restated Joint Venture Agreement dated
August 16, 1999 by and between Oly Lantana, L.P., and
Stratus 7000 West, Ltd. Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.18 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Stratus for the Quarter ended September 30, 1999. ("the
Stratus 1999 Third Quarter 10-Q".)

10.17 The Reimbursement Claim Agreement dated October
29, 1999 by an between Circle C Land Corp. and the City
of Austin. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19
to the Stratus 1999 Third Quarter 10-Q.

Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements (Exhibits
10.18 through 10.21)

10.18 Stratus' Performance Incentive Awards Program, as
amended effective February 11, 1999. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Stratus' 1998 Form 10-K.

10.19 Stratus Stock Option Plan, as amended.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Stratus's
1997 Form 10-K.

10.20 Stratus 1996 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors, as amended. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.10 to Stratus' 1997 Form 10-K.

10.21 Stratus Properties Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan as
amended effective February 11, 1999. Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Stratus' 1998 Form 10-K.

21.1 List of subsidiaries.

23.1 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP.

24.1 Certified resolution of the Board of Directors of
Stratus authorizing this report to be signed on behalf
of any officer or director pursuant to a Power of
Attorney.

24.2 Powers of attorney pursuant to which a report has been
signed on behalf of certain officers and directors of
Stratus.

27.1 Financial Data Schedule.
E-2

STRATUS PROPERTIES INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


The financial statements in the schedule listed below should
be read in conjunction with the financial statements of Stratus
contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Page
Report of Independent Public Accountants F-1
Schedule III-Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation F-2

Schedules other than the one listed above have been omitted
since they are either not required, not applicable or the
required information is included in the financial statements or
notes thereto.


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
of Stratus Properties Inc.:

We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, the financial statements as of December 31,
1999 and 1998 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1999 included elsewhere in Stratus Properties Inc.'s
Annual Report on Form 10-K, and have issued our report thereon
dated January 19, 2000. Our audits were made for the purpose of
forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a
whole. The accompanying schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management and is presented for purposes of complying
with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not
part of the basic financial statements. This schedule has been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the
basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in
all material respects the financial data required to be set forth
therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole.
/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
Arthur Andersen LLP

Austin, Texas
January 19, 2000
F-1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Stratus Properties Inc.
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 1999
(In Thousands)
SCHEDULE III

Cost Gross
Capitalized Amounts at
Subsequent to December 31,
Intial Cost Acquisitions 1999
---------------- ------------ ------------
Building Building
and and
Improve- Improv-
Land ments Land Land ements
-------- ------- -------- ------- -------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Developed Lots
Camino Real, San Antonio, TX $ 72 - $ 216 $ 288 -
Copper Lakes, Houston,TX 74 - 591 665 -
Undevloped Acerage
Camino Real, San Antonio, TX 391 - 44 435 -
Copper Lakes, Houston, TX 1,922 - 1,300 3,222 -
Bent Tree Apt./ Retail, Dallas TX 873 - - 873 -
Barton Creek (North), Austin, TX 5,825 - 29,482 35,307 -
Barton Creek (South), Austin, TX 14,764 - 9,220 23,984 -
Lantana, Austin, TX 3,934 - 1,310 5,244 -
Longhorn Properties, Austin, TX 15,792 - 5,606 21,398 -
Operating Properties
Barton Creek Utilities, Austin, TX - 457 - - 457
-------- ------- -------- ------- -------
$43,647 457 $ 47,769 $91,416 457
======== ======= ======== ======= =======
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Stratus Properties Inc.
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMLATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
December 31, 1999

Number of Lots
and Acres Accumulated
------------ Depre- Year
Total Lots Acres ciation Acquired
------- ----- ----- -------- --------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Developed Lots
Camino Real, San Antonio, TX $ 288 8 - - 1990
Copper Lakes, Houston,TX 665 16 - - 1991
Undevloped Acerage
Camino Real, San Antonio, TX 435 - 23 - 1990
Copper Lakes, Houston, TX 3,222 - 120 - 1991
Bent Tree Apt./ Retail, Dallas TX 873 - 10 - 1990
Barton Creek (North), Austin, TX 35,307 - 650 - 1988
Barton Creek (South), Austin, TX 23,984 - 1,623 - 1988
Lantana, Austin, TX 5,244 - 501 - 1994
Longhorn Properties, Austin, TX 21,398 - 1,274 - 1992
Operating Properties
Barton Creek Utilities, Austin, TX 457 - - 209 1997
------- ----- ----- ------
$91,873 24 4,201 $ 209
======= ===== ===== ======

</TABLE>
F-2

Stratus Properties Inc.
Notes to Schedule III
(In Thousands)

(1) Reconciliation of Real Estate Properties:

The changes in real estate assets for the years ended
December 31, 1999 and 1998 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1999 1998
-------- ---------
(in Thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Balance, beginning of year $ 96,678 $ 105,320
Acquisitions 40 728
Improvements and other 5,173 5,619
Cost of real estate sold (10,018) (14,989)
-------- ---------
Balance, end of year $ 91,873 $ 96,678
======== =========

</TABLE>

The aggregate net book value for federal income tax purposes as
of December 31, 1999 was $114,880,000.

(2) Reconciliation of Accumulated Depreciation:

The changes in accumulated depreciation for the years ended
December 31, 1999 and 1998 are as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

1999 1998
------ ------
(in Thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Balance, beginning of year $ 122 $ 46
Depreciation expense 87 76
------ ------
Balance, end of year $ 209 $ 122
====== ======

</TABLE>

Depreciation of buildings and improvements reflected in the
statements of operations is calculated over estimated lives of 30
years.

(3) Concurrent with certain year-end 1994 debt negotiations, the
Partnership analyzed the carrying amount of its real estate
assets, using generally accepted accounting principles, and
recorded a $115 million pre-tax, non-cash write-down. The
actual amounts that will be realized depend on future market
conditions and may be more or less than the amounts recorded
in the Partnership's financial statements
F-3