Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017
or
☐Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number: 0-24649
REPUBLIC BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Kentucky
61-0862051
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
601 West Market Street, Louisville, Kentucky
40202
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (502) 584-3600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐
Accelerated filer ☒
Non-accelerated filer ☐
Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, as of April 30, 2017, was 18,615,302 and 2,242,965.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements.
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Item 6.
Exhibits.
SIGNATURES
2
Item 1. Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
March 31,
December 31,
2017
2016
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
$
206,187
289,309
Securities available for sale
526,270
481,275
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $52,479 in 2017 and $53,249 in 2016)
51,860
52,864
Mortgage loans held for sale, at fair value
5,193
11,662
Consumer loans held for sale, at fair value
3,679
2,198
Consumer loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or fair value
1,420
1,310
Loans
3,710,376
3,810,778
Allowance for loan and lease losses
(42,362)
(32,920)
Loans, net
3,668,014
3,777,858
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
28,208
Premises and equipment, net
43,962
42,869
Goodwill
16,300
Other real estate owned
1,362
1,391
Bank owned life insurance
62,185
61,794
Other assets and accrued interest receivable
50,152
49,271
TOTAL ASSETS
4,664,792
4,816,309
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing
1,070,237
971,952
Interest-bearing
2,278,547
2,188,740
Total deposits
3,348,784
3,160,692
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings
144,375
173,473
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
467,500
802,500
Subordinated note
41,240
Other liabilities and accrued interest payable
42,229
33,998
Total liabilities
4,044,128
4,211,903
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Footnote 9)
—
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, no par value
4,904
4,906
Additional paid in capital
138,634
138,192
Retained earnings
475,885
460,621
Accumulated other comprehensive income
1,241
687
Total stockholders’ equity
620,664
604,406
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
See accompanying footnotes to consolidated financial statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans, including fees
58,004
41,429
Taxable investment securities
2,155
1,855
Federal Home Loan Bank stock and other
724
731
Total interest income
60,883
44,015
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits
1,879
1,392
25
2,292
2,953
249
211
Total interest expense
4,445
4,581
NET INTEREST INCOME
56,438
39,434
Provision for loan and lease losses
12,351
5,186
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
44,087
34,248
NONINTEREST INCOME:
Service charges on deposit accounts
3,247
3,140
Net refund transfer fees
15,382
17,078
Mortgage banking income
1,160
1,261
Interchange fee income
2,326
2,123
Program fees
1,091
319
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
391
339
Net gains on other real estate owned
142
248
Other
1,184
413
Total noninterest income
24,923
24,921
NONINTEREST EXPENSES:
Salaries and employee benefits
21,211
17,083
Occupancy and equipment, net
5,967
5,419
Communication and transportation
1,272
1,073
Marketing and development
1,004
507
FDIC insurance expense
450
658
Bank franchise tax expense
2,435
2,451
Data processing
1,652
1,333
Interchange related expense
1,058
904
Supplies
527
449
Other real estate owned expense
97
80
Legal and professional fees
752
823
2,514
1,761
Total noninterest expenses
38,939
32,541
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE
30,071
26,628
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
10,054
8,893
NET INCOME
20,017
17,735
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Class A Common Stock
0.97
0.86
Class B Common Stock
0.88
0.78
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
0.96
0.85
0.77
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE:
0.209
0.198
0.190
0.180
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
Net income
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Change in fair value of derivatives used for cash flow hedges
28
(571)
Reclassification amount for derivative losses realized in income
66
87
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale
706
Change in unrealized gain on security available for sale for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings
53
(149)
Net unrealized gains
853
1,659
Tax effect
(299)
(580)
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax
554
1,079
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
20,571
18,814
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2017
Common Stock
Accumulated
Class A
Class B
Additional
Total
Shares
Paid In
Retained
Comprehensive
Stockholders’
Outstanding
Amount
Capital
Earnings
Income
Equity
Balance, January 1, 2017
18,615
2,245
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income
Dividends declared Common Stock:
Class A Shares
(3,891)
Class B Shares
(427)
Stock options exercised, net of shares redeemed
33
Repurchase of Class A Common Stock
(13)
(2)
(107)
(435)
(544)
Conversion of Class B Common Stock to Class A Common Stock
Net change in notes receivable on Class A Common Stock
51
Deferred director compensation expense - Class A Common Stock
55
Stock based compensation expense - performance stock units
132
Stock based compensation expense - restricted stock
215
Stock based compensation expense - stock options
63
Balance, March 31, 2017
2,243
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization on investment securities, net
138
135
Accretion on loans, deposits and core deposit intangible, net
(583)
(873)
Depreciation of premises and equipment
2,100
1,716
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights
353
305
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale
(977)
(1,095)
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale
(33,245)
(36,992)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale
40,691
35,022
Net gain on sale of consumer loans held for sale
(1,108)
(433)
Origination of consumer loans held for sale
(126,924)
(44,068)
Proceeds from sale of consumer loans held for sale
126,441
44,034
Net gain realized on sale of other real estate owned
(212)
(248)
Writedowns of other real estate owned
70
62
Stock based compensation expense
410
261
(391)
(339)
Net change in other assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable
209
(180)
Accrued interest payable
(90)
54
Other assets
(2,096)
(2,390)
Other liabilities
8,700
7,878
Net cash provided by operating activities
45,909
25,770
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of securities available for sale
(54,390)
(370,084)
Proceeds from calls, maturities and paydowns of securities available for sale
10,017
370,390
Proceeds from calls, maturities and paydowns of securities held to maturity
1,002
882
Net change in outstanding warehouse lines of credit
90,274
(7,257)
Purchase of non-business-acquisition loans, including premiums paid
(1,224)
(23,188)
Net change in other loans
8,800
4,274
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned
501
588
Net purchases of premises and equipment
(3,193)
(887)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
51,787
(25,282)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net change in deposits
188,092
249,169
Net change in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings
(29,098)
(75,540)
Payments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
(435,000)
(182,000)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
100,000
Net proceeds from Common Stock options exercised
Cash dividends paid
(4,301)
(4,082)
Net cash used in financing activities
(180,818)
(12,398)
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(83,122)
(11,910)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
210,082
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
198,172
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASHFLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest
4,535
4,527
Income taxes
331
156
SUPPLEMENTAL NONCASH DISCLOSURES:
Transfers from loans to real estate acquired in settlement of loans
330
656
Loans provided for sales of other real estate owned
256
7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – MARCH 31, 2017 and 2016 AND DECEMBER 31, 2016 (UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Republic Bancorp, Inc. (the “Parent Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Republic Bank & Trust Company (“RB&T” or the “Bank”) and Republic Insurance Services, Inc. (the “Captive”). The Bank is a Kentucky-based, state chartered non-member financial institution that provides both traditional and non-traditional banking products through four distinct operating segments using a multitude of delivery channels. While the Bank operates primarily in its market footprint, its non-brick-and-mortar delivery channels allow it to reach clients across the United States. The Captive is a Nevada-based, wholly-owned insurance subsidiary of the Company. The Captive provides property and casualty insurance coverage to the Company and the Bank as well as 10 other third-party insurance captives for which insurance may not be available or economically feasible. Republic Bancorp Capital Trust (“RBCT”) is a Delaware statutory business trust that is a wholly-owned unconsolidated finance subsidiary of Republic Bancorp, Inc. All companies are collectively referred to as (“Republic” or the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Republic’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
As of March 31, 2017, the Company was divided into four distinct operating segments: Traditional Banking, Warehouse Lending (“Warehouse”), Mortgage Banking and Republic Processing Group (“RPG”). Management considers the first three segments to collectively constitute “Core Bank” or “Core Banking” activities. Correspondent Lending operations and the Company’s national branchless banking platform, MemoryBank®, are considered part of the Traditional Banking segment. The RPG segment includes the following divisions: Tax Refund Solutions (“TRS”), Republic Credit Solutions (“RCS”) and Republic Payment Solutions (“RPS”). TRS generates the majority of RPG’s income, with the relatively smaller divisions of RPG, RCS and RPS, considered immaterial for separate and independent segment reporting. All divisions of the RPG segment operate through the Bank.
8
Core Banking (includes Traditional Banking, Warehouse Lending and Mortgage Banking segments)
The Traditional Banking segment provides traditional banking products primarily to customers in the Company’s market footprint. As of March 31, 2017, Republic had 45 full-service banking centers and one loan production office (“LPO”) with locations as follows:
Kentucky — 33
Metropolitan Louisville — 19
Central Kentucky — 9
Elizabethtown — 1
Frankfort — 1
Georgetown — 1
Lexington — 5
Shelbyville — 1
Western Kentucky — 2
Owensboro — 2
Northern Kentucky — 3
Covington — 1
Florence — 1
Independence — 1
Southern Indiana — 3
Floyds Knobs — 1
Jeffersonville — 1
New Albany — 1
Metropolitan Tampa, Florida — 6
Metropolitan Cincinnati, Ohio — 1
Metropolitan Nashville, Tennessee — 3*
*Includes one LPO
Republic’s headquarters are located in Louisville, which is the largest city in Kentucky based on population.
Core Banking results of operations are primarily dependent upon net interest income, which represents the difference between the interest income and fees on interest-earning assets and the interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Principal interest-earning Core Banking assets represent investment securities and commercial and consumer loans primarily secured by real estate and/or personal property. Interest-bearing liabilities primarily consist of interest-bearing deposit accounts, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, as well as short-term and long-term borrowing sources. Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances have traditionally been a significant borrowing source for the Bank.
Other sources of Core Banking income include service charges on deposit accounts, debit and credit card interchange fee income, title insurance commissions, fees charged to clients for trust services, increases in the cash surrender value of Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”) and revenue generated from Mortgage Banking activities. Mortgage Banking activities represent both the origination and sale of loans in the secondary market and the servicing of loans for others, primarily the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac” or “FHLMC”) and the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae” or “FNMA”).
Core Banking operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment expenses, communication and transportation costs, data processing, interchange related expenses, marketing and development expenses, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance expense, franchise tax expense and various other general and administrative costs. Core Banking results of operations are significantly impacted by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, government laws and policies and actions of regulatory agencies.
9
The Core Bank provides short-term, revolving credit facilities to mortgage bankers across the United States through mortgage warehouse lines of credit. These credit facilities are primarily secured by single family, first lien residential real estate loans. The credit facility enables the mortgage banking clients to close single family, first lien residential real estate loans in their own name and temporarily fund their inventory of these closed loans until the loans are sold to investors approved by the Bank or purchased by the Bank through its Correspondent Lending channel. Individual loans are expected to remain on the warehouse line for an average of 15 to 30 days. Reverse mortgage loans typically remain on the line longer than conventional mortgage loans. Interest income and loan fees are accrued for each individual loan during the time the loan remains on the warehouse line and collected when the loan is sold. The Core Bank receives the sale proceeds of each loan directly from the investor and applies the funds to pay off the warehouse advance and related accrued interest and fees. The remaining proceeds are credited to the mortgage-banking client.
Primarily from its Warehouse clients, the Core Bank acquires single family, first lien mortgage loans that meet the Core Bank’s specifications through its Correspondent Lending channel. Substantially all loans purchased through the Correspondent Lending channel are purchased at a premium. Loans acquired through the Correspondent Lending channel generally reflect borrowers outside of the Bank’s historical market footprint, with 74% of loans acquired through this origination channel as of March 31, 2017, secured by collateral in the state of California.
Republic Processing Group
Tax Refund Solutions division — Through its TRS division, the Bank is one of a limited number of financial institutions that facilitates the receipt and payment of federal and state tax refund products and offers a credit product through third-party tax preparers located throughout the United States, as well as tax-preparation software providers (collectively, the “Tax Providers”). Substantially all of the business generated by the TRS division occurs in the first half of the year. The TRS division traditionally operates at a loss during the second half of the year, during which time the division incurs costs preparing for the upcoming year’s first quarter tax season.
Refund Transfers (“RTs”) are fee-based products whereby a tax refund is issued to the taxpayer after the Bank has received the refund from the federal or state government. There is no credit risk or borrowing cost associated with these products because they are only delivered to the taxpayer upon receipt of the tax refund directly from the governmental paying authority. Fees earned on RTs, net of rebates, are reported as noninterest income under the line item “Net refund transfer fees.”
TRS first offered its Easy Advance (“EA”) tax credit product during the first two months of 2016 and for a second successive year during the first two months of 2017. For the first quarter 2017 tax season the Company modified the EA product offering to have more than one advance amount and a different price structure to the Tax Providers based on the amount borrowed by the taxpayer. All other features of the product remained substantially the same as those from the first quarter 2016 tax season, including the following:
·
No EA fee charged to the taxpayer customer;
All fees for the product were paid by the Tax Providers with a restriction prohibiting the Tax Providers from passing along the fees to the taxpayer customer;
No requirement that the taxpayer customer pay for another bank product, such as an RT;
Multiple funds disbursement methods, including direct deposit, prepaid card, check or Walmart Direct2Cash® product, based on the taxpayer customer’s election;
Repayment of the EA to the Bank was deducted from the taxpayer customer’s tax refund proceeds; and
If an insufficient refund to repay the EA occurred:
o
there was no recourse to the taxpayer customer,
no negative credit reporting on the taxpayer customer, and
no collection efforts against the taxpayer customer.
Fees paid by the Tax Providers to the Company for the EA product are reported as interest income on loans. EAs during 2017 and 2016 were generally repaid within three weeks after the taxpayer customer’s tax return was submitted to the applicable taxing authority. EAs do not have a contractual due date but are eligible for delinquency consideration three weeks after the taxpayer customer’s tax return is submitted to the applicable taxing authority. Provisions for loan losses on EAs are estimated when advances are made, with all expected loss provisions made in the first quarter of each year. Unpaid EAs are generally charged-off within 81 days after the taxpayer customer’s tax return is submitted to the applicable taxing authority, with the majority of charge-offs typically recorded during the second quarter of the year.
10
Related to the overall credit losses on EAs, the Bank’s ability to control those losses is highly dependent upon its ability to predict the taxpayer’s likelihood to receive the tax refund as claimed on the taxpayer’s tax return. Each year, the Bank’s EA approval model is based primarily on the prior-year’s tax refund funding patterns. Because much of the loan volume occurs each year before that year’s tax refund funding patterns can be analyzed and subsequent underwriting changes made, credit losses during a current year could be higher than management’s predictions if tax refund funding patterns change materially between years.
Republic Credit Solutions division — Through its RCS division, the Bank offers consumer credit products. In general, the credit products are unsecured, small dollar consumer loans with maturities of 30-days-or-more, and are dependent on various factors including the consumer’s ability to repay.
The Company reports RCS loans originated for investment under “Loans,” while loans originated for sale are reported under “Consumer loans held for sale.” The Company reports interest income and loan origination fees earned on RCS loans under “Loans, including fees,” while any gains or losses on sale reported as noninterest income under “Program fees.”
Republic Payment Solutions division — Through its RPS division, the Bank is an issuing bank offering general-purpose reloadable prepaid cards through third-party program managers.
The Company reports fees related to RPS programs under Program fees. Additionally, the Company’s portion of interchange revenue generated by prepaid card transactions is reported as noninterest income under “Interchange fee income.”
11
Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”)
The following ASUs were issued prior to March 31, 2017 and are considered relevant to the Company’s financial statements. Generally, if an issued-but-not-yet-effective ASU with an expected immaterial impact to the Company has been disclosed in prior Company financial statements, it will not be included below.
ASU. No.
Topic
Nature of Update
Date Adoption Required
Method of Adoption
Expected Impact to Company's Financial Statements
2014-09
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)
Requires that revenue from contracts with clients be recognized upon transfer of control of a good or service in the amount of consideration expected to be received. Changes the accounting for certain contract costs, including whether they may be offset against revenue in the statements of income, and requires additional disclosures about revenue and contract costs.
January 1, 2018
Full retrospective approach or a modified-retrospective approach.
While the Company believes this ASU will have an immaterial impact, it continues to evaluate this ASU for changing facts and circumstances in the Company's operations as the effective date approaches.
2016-02
Leases (Topic 842)
Most leases are considered operating leases, which are not accounted for on the lessees’ balance sheets. The significant change under this ASU is that those operating leases will be recorded on the balance sheet.
January 1, 2019
Modified-retrospective approach, which includes a number of optional practical expedients.
Currently under analysis. During 2017, the Company continued to review all of its operating leases and analyze the impact of adopting this ASU.
2016-13
Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326)
Amends guidance on reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized-cost basis and available-for-sale debt securities.
January 1, 2020
Modified-retrospective approach.
The Company expects a substantial, yet fully undetermined, increase in its allowance for credit losses. During 2016 and into 2017, the Company formed a committee to implement the transition and also began analyzing its loan-level data.
2016-18
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)
Requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. As a result, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments do not provide a definition of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents.
Retrospective transition.
Immaterial
2017-01
Business Combinations (Topic 805)
Clarifies the definition of a business. The amendments in this ASU are intended to help companies and other organizations evaluate whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses.
Prospectively.
2017-03
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323)
These amendments add text of “SEC Staff Announcement: Disclosure of the Impact That Recently Issued Accounting Standards Will Have on the Financial Statements of a Registrant When Such Standards Are Adopted in a Future Period (in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin ["SAB"] Topic 11.M).” This announcement applies to ASU No. 2014-09, ASU No. 2016-02, and ASU No. 206-13 above.
N/A
2017-04
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)
This ASU simplifies goodwill impairment testing by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The ASU also eliminates the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary.
Prospectively, with early adoption permitted.
2017-08
Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Topic 310-20)
This ASU shortens the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the ASU requires the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity.
Modified retrospective, with early adoption permitted.
Currently under analysis.
12
2. 2016 ACQUISITION OF CORNERSTONE BANCORP, INC.
OVERVIEW
On May 17, 2016, the Company completed its acquisition of Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc. (“Cornerstone”), and its wholly-owned bank subsidiary Cornerstone Community Bank, for approximately $32 million in cash. The primary reason for the acquisition of Cornerstone was to expand the Company’s footprint in the Tampa, Florida metropolitan statistical area.
ACQUISITION SUMMARY
The following table provides a summary of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as recorded by Cornerstone, the previously reported preliminary fair value adjustments necessary to adjust those acquired assets and assumed liabilities to fair value, final recast adjustments to those previously reported preliminary fair values, and the final fair values of those assets and liabilities as recorded by the Company. Effective October 1, 2016, management believed it had finalized the fair values of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities within the 12 months following the date of acquisition, as allowed by GAAP.
Summary of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed
May 17, 2016
As Previously Reported
As Recasted
As Recorded
Fair Value
Recast
by Cornerstone
Adjustments
by Republic
Assets acquired:
22,707
Investment securities
329
195,136
(5,525)
a
13
189,624
(1,955)
1,955
193,181
(3,570)
224
7,770
4,457
b
12,227
Core deposit intangible
1,205
c
Deferred income taxes
3,714
(74)
d
3,640
7,461
Total assets acquired
236,044
2,018
238,075
Liabilities assumed:
52,908
152,257
92
e
152,349
205,165
205,257
4,124
2,244
787
f
3,031
Total liabilities assumed
211,533
879
212,412
Net assets acquired
24,511
1,139
25,663
Cash consideration paid
(31,795)
6,132
Explanation of fair value adjustments
a.
Reflects the fair value adjustment based on the Company’s evaluation of the acquired loan portfolio and to eliminate the acquiree’s recorded allowance for loan losses.
b.
Reflects the fair value adjustment based on the Company’s evaluation of the premises and equipment acquired.
c.
Reflects the fair value adjustment for the core deposit intangible asset recorded as a result of the acquisition.
d.
Reflects the differences in the carrying values of acquired assets and assumed liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their basis for federal income tax purposes.
e.
Reflects the fair value adjustment based on the Company’s evaluation of the assumed time deposits.
f.
Reflects the amount needed to adjust other liabilities to estimated fair value and to record certain liabilities directly attributable to the acquisition of Cornerstone.
Goodwill of approximately $6 million, which is the excess of the merger consideration over the fair value of net assets acquired, was recorded in the Cornerstone acquisition and is the result of expected operational synergies and other factors. This goodwill is all attributable to the Company’s Traditional Banking segment and is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company’s consolidated statements of income include approximately $194,000 of acquisition-related costs associated with the Cornerstone acquisition. With regard to the Company’s Cornerstone acquisition, pro forma financial information as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of 2016 is not considered material and is not included in this filing.
14
3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Securities Available for Sale
The gross amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) were as follows:
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Fair
March 31, 2017 (in thousands)
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. Government agencies
320,381
(948)
319,525
Private label mortgage backed security
3,543
4,682
Mortgage backed securities - residential
95,857
2,191
(226)
97,822
Collateralized mortgage obligations
83,317
394
(780)
82,931
Freddie Mac preferred stock
Community Reinvestment Act mutual fund
2,500
(42)
2,458
Corporate bonds
15,003
255
15,258
Trust preferred security
3,460
(260)
3,200
Total securities available for sale
524,061
4,465
(2,256)
December 31, 2016 (in thousands)
295,425
226
(1,107)
294,544
3,691
1,086
4,777
71,197
2,027
(220)
73,004
88,559
334
(1,239)
87,654
483
(45)
2,455
15,004
154
15,158
3,449
(249)
479,825
4,310
(2,860)
Securities Held to Maturity
The carrying value, gross unrecognized gains and losses, and fair value of securities held to maturity were as follows:
Carrying
Unrecognized
504
(1)
503
167
26,141
267
(36)
26,372
25,059
439
(61)
25,437
Total securities held to maturity
717
(98)
52,479
506
158
170
27,142
250
(124)
27,268
25,058
312
(63)
25,307
574
(189)
53,249
At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders’ equity.
15
Sales of Securities Available for Sale
During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 there were no gains or losses on sales or calls of securities available for sale.
Investment Securities by Contractual Maturity
The amortized cost and fair value of the investment securities portfolio by contractual maturity at March 31, 2017 follows. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date are detailed separately.
Securities
Available for Sale
Held to Maturity
Due in one year or less
96,033
96,079
502
Due from one year to five years
229,351
228,480
5,075
5,015
Due from five years to ten years
10,000
10,224
19,984
20,423
Due beyond ten years
Total securities
Freddie Mac Preferred Stock
During 2008, the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) announced that the FHFA was placing Freddie Mac under conservatorship and giving management control to the FHFA. The Bank contemporaneously determined that its 40,000 shares of Freddie Mac preferred stock were fully impaired and recorded an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) charge of $2.1 million in 2008. The OTTI charge brought the carrying value of the stock to $0. In 2014, based on active trading volume of Freddie Mac preferred stock, the Company determined it appropriate to record an unrealized gain to AOCI related to its Freddie Mac preferred stock holdings. Based on the stock’s market closing price as of March 31, 2017, the Company’s unrealized gain for its Freddie Mac preferred stock totaled $394,000.
Corporate Bonds
During 2013 and 2016, the Bank purchased floating rate corporate bonds. The bonds were rated “investment grade” by accredited rating agencies as of their respective purchase dates. The total fair value of the Bank’s corporate bonds represented 7% and 8% of the Bank’s investment portfolio as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Mortgage Backed Securities and Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
At March 31, 2017, with the exception of the $4.7 million private label mortgage backed security, all other mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) held by the Bank were issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily Freddie Mac and the Fannie Mae. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were gross unrealized losses of $1.0 million and $1.5 million related to available for sale mortgage backed securities and CMOs. Because these unrealized losses are attributable to changes in interest rates and illiquidity, and not credit quality, and because the Bank does not have the intent to sell these securities, and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, management does not consider these securities to have OTTI.
16
Trust Preferred Security
During the fourth quarter of 2015, the Parent Company purchased a $3 million floating rate trust preferred security (“TRUP”) at a price of 68% of par. The coupon on this security is based on the 3-month London Interbank Borrowing Rate (“LIBOR”) rate plus 159 basis points. The Company performed an initial analysis prior to acquisition and performs ongoing analysis of the credit risk of the underlying borrower in relation to its TRUP.
Unrealized-Loss Analysis
Securities with unrealized losses at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, were as follows:
Less than 12 months
12 months or more
Securities available for sale:
183,282
17,537
46,440
250,459
(2,214)
252,917
138,002
9,427
(122)
4,211
13,638
37,547
(690)
15,668
(549)
53,215
190,631
(2,213)
19,879
(647)
210,510
Securities held to maturity:
7,066
4,940
12,006
(97)
12,509
13,315
4,937
13,821
(126)
18,758
At March 31, 2017, the Bank’s security portfolio consisted of 182 securities, 47 of which were in an unrealized loss position.
At December 31, 2016, the Bank’s security portfolio consisted of 179 securities, 45 of which were in an unrealized loss position.
17
Other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”)
Unrealized losses for all investment securities are reviewed to determine whether the losses are “other-than-temporary.” Investment securities are evaluated for OTTI on at least a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation to determine whether a decline in value below amortized cost is other-than-temporary. In conducting this assessment, the Bank evaluates a number of factors including, but not limited to the following:
The length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis;
The Bank’s intent to hold until maturity or sell the debt security prior to maturity;
An analysis of whether it is more-likely-than-not that the Bank will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery;
Adverse conditions specifically related to the security, an industry, or a geographic area;
The historical and implied volatility of the fair value of the security;
The payment structure of the security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments;
Failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments;
Any rating changes by a rating agency; and
Recoveries or additional decline in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.
The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a general lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for the anticipated credit losses.
The Bank owns one private label mortgage backed security with a total carrying value of $4.7 million at March 31, 2017. This security is mostly backed by “Alternative A” first lien mortgage loans, but also has an insurance “wrap” or guarantee as an added layer of protection to the security holder. This asset is illiquid, and as such, the Bank determined it to be a Level 3 security in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. Based on this determination, the Bank utilized an income valuation model (“present value model”) approach, in determining the fair value of the security. This approach is beneficial for positions that are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, and/or where valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability. Such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used. Management’s best estimate consists of both internal and external support for this investment.
See additional discussion regarding the Bank’s private label mortgage backed security under Footnote 10 “Fair Value” in this section of the filing.
Pledged Investment Securities
Investment securities pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and securities held for other purposes, as required or permitted by law are as follows:
March 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
Carrying amount
224,778
231,695
Fair value
224,978
231,891
18
4. LOANS HELD FOR SALE
In the ordinary course of business, the Bank originates for sale mortgage loans and consumer loans. Mortgage loans originated for sale are primarily originated and sold into the secondary market through the Bank’s Mortgage Banking operations, while consumer loans originated for sale are originated and sold through the RCS division of the Company’s RPG segment.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value
See additional detail regarding mortgage loans originated for sale, at fair value under Footnote 11 “Mortgage Banking Activities” of this section of the filing.
Consumer Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value
During the first quarter of 2016, RCS initiated an installment loan program, in which the Company sells 100% of the receivables approximately 21 days after origination. The Company carries these loans at fair value, with the loans marked to market on a monthly basis, and any changes in their fair value reported as a component of “Program fees.”
Activity for consumer loans held for sale and carried at fair value was as follows:
Balance, beginning of period
12,238
415
Proceeds from the sale of consumer loans held for sale
(10,783)
26
Balance, end of period
Consumer Loans Held for Sale, at Lower of Cost or Fair Value
RCS originates for sale its line-of-credit product and its credit card product. The Bank sells 90% of the balances maintained through these products within two days of loan origination and retains a 10% interest. The line-of-credit product represents the substantial majority of activity in consumer loans held for sale and carried at the lower of cost or fair value, as RCS moved beyond the pilot phase for this product in June 2015. In December 2015, RCS began piloting its credit card product. Any gains or losses on the sale of RCS products are reported as a component of “Program fees.”
Activity for consumer loans held for sale and carried at the lower of cost or market value was as follows:
514
114,686
43,653
(115,658)
(44,034)
1,082
433
566
19
5. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
The composition of the loan portfolio at period end follows:
Core Bank:
Residential real estate:
Owner occupied
969,705
1,000,148
Owner occupied - correspondent*
141,375
149,028
Nonowner occupied
164,742
156,605
Commercial real estate
1,049,193
1,060,496
Construction & land development
130,766
119,650
Commercial & industrial
270,652
259,026
Lease financing receivables
13,853
13,614
Warehouse lines of credit*
495,165
585,439
Home equity
341,611
341,285
Consumer:
Credit cards
14,644
13,414
Overdrafts
786
803
Automobile loans
55,962
52,579
Other consumer
19,215
19,744
Total Core Bank
3,667,669
3,771,831
Republic Processing Group*:
6,695
Easy Advances
10,672
Republic Credit Solutions
32,021
32,252
Total Republic Processing Group
42,707
38,947
Total loans**
Total loans, net
*Identifies loans to borrowers located primarily outside of the Bank’s market footprint.
**Total loans are presented inclusive of premiums, discounts and net loan origination fees and costs. See table directly below for expanded detail.
The following table reconciles the contractually receivable and carrying amounts of loans at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Contractual receivable
3,715,075
3,816,086
Unearned income(1)
(1,098)
(1,050)
Unamortized premiums(2)
1,654
1,838
Unaccreted discounts(3)
(8,842)
(9,397)
Net unamortized deferred origination fees and costs
3,587
3,301
Carrying value of loans
Unearned income relates to lease financing receivables.
Premiums predominately relate to loans acquired through the Bank’s Correspondent Lending channel.
(3)
Unaccreted discounts include accretable and non-accretable discounts and predominately relate to loans acquired in the Bank’s 2016 Cornerstone acquisition and its 2012 FDIC-assisted transactions.
20
Loan Purchases
The Core Bank acquires for investment single family, first lien mortgage loans that meet the Core Bank’s specifications through its Correspondent Lending channel. In addition, the Bank has acquired in the past unsecured consumer installment loans for investment from a third-party originator. Such consumer loans were purchased at par and were selected by the Bank based on certain underwriting specifications.
The following table reflects the purchased activity of single family, first lien mortgage loans and unsecured consumer loans, by class, during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
1,224
20,521
Other consumer*
2,667
Total purchased loans**
23,188
* Represents origination amount, inclusive of applicable purchase premiums.
**Purchases are all part of Core Bank operations.
Loans Acquired in Cornerstone Acquisition
The following table summarizes loans acquired in the Company’s May 17, 2016 Cornerstone acquisition, finalized as of October 1, 2016:
Contractual Receivable
Non-accretable Discount
Accretable Discount
Acquisition-Day Fair Value
15,487
(393)
15,094
11,196
(101)
11,095
106,089
(1,498)
104,591
18,277
(502)
17,775
11,462
(191)
11,271
20,652
(350)
20,302
Consumer and other
2,347
(147)
2,200
Total loans - ASC 310-20
185,510
(3,182)
182,328
2,963
(822)
(15)
2,126
1,721
(320)
(167)
1,234
4,315
(617)
(197)
3,501
175
1
382
(178)
(11)
193
Total loans - ASC 310-30 - PCI loans
9,626
(1,941)
(389)
7,296
Total loans acquired
(3,571)
21
Purchased-Credit-Impaired (“PCI”) Loans
The Bank acquired PCI loans on May 17, 2016 in its Cornerstone acquisition and during the year ended December 31, 2012 in two FDIC-assisted transactions. PCI loans are accounted for under ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality.
Management utilized the following criteria in determining which loans were classified as PCI loans for its May 17, 2016 Cornerstone acquisition:
Loans for which the Bank assigned a non-accretable discount
Loans classified as nonaccrual when acquired
Loans past due 90-days-or-more when acquired
The following table reconciles the contractually required and carrying amounts of all PCI loans at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Contractually-required principal
14,926
15,587
Non-accretable amount
(1,806)
(1,713)
Accretable amount
(3,409)
(3,600)
9,711
10,274
The following table presents a rollforward of the accretable amount on all PCI loans for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:
(4,125)
Transfers between non-accretable and accretable
90
(455)
Net accretion into interest income on loans, including loan fees
101
727
(3,853)
22
Credit Quality Indicators
Based on the Bank’s internal analyses performed as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the following tables reflect loans by risk category. Risk categories are defined in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016:
Special
Doubtful /
PCI Loans -
Total Rated
Pass
Mention*
Substandard*
Loss
Group 1
Substandard
Loans**
20,549
12,972
186
1,799
35,506
Owner occupied - correspondent
649
518
2,246
1,031,746
6,345
4,107
6,995
129,894
89
783
269,756
722
151
23
Warehouse lines of credit
232
2,035
2,456
212
1,940,414
28,586
21,338
7,815
1,896
2,000,049
Republic Processing Group:
122
Total Republic Processing Group:
136
Total rated loans
1,940,428
21,460
2,000,185
21,344
13,117
218
2,267
36,946
1,115
523
2,294
1,042,137
7,086
4,224
7,049
118,769
791
257,579
1,270
1,763
94
99
2,212
166
2,017,538
30,702
21,330
7,908
2,366
2,079,844
82
6,777
2,024,233
21,412
2,086,621
*At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Special Mention included $2 million and $2 million and Substandard included $1 million and $1 million that were removed from PCI accounting in accordance with ASC 310-30-35-13 due to a post-acquisition troubled debt restructuring.
** The above tables exclude all non-classified residential real estate, home equity and consumer loans at the respective period ends.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Activity in the allowance for loan and lease losses (“Allowance”) by loan class follows:
Allowance Rollforward
March 31, 2016
Beginning
Charge-
Ending
Balance
Provision
offs
Recoveries
7,158
(143)
59
7,071
8,301
(182)
(144)
74
8,049
373
(9)
623
(16)
607
1,198
1,052
(44)
1,095
8,078
7,898
7,672
(41)
27
7,678
1,850
383
2,233
1,303
69
1,348
1,511
1,488
1,455
(75)
1,384
145
1,464
1,238
967
985
3,757
(4)
3,831
2,996
67
(35)
3,054
490
38
(27)
448
(12)
466
675
83
(184)
641
351
184
(161)
76
526
36
563
56
771
183
(230)
825
479
208
(131)
648
27,928
241
(459)
280
27,990
25,792
498
(612)
328
26,006
(25)
8,601
(860)
7,741
3,574
(405)
3,169
Refund Anticipation Loans
(235)
235
(247)
247
4,967
3,769
(2,285)
180
6,631
1,699
1,361
(846)
86
2,300
4,992
12,110
(3,145)
14,372
4,688
(1,251)
333
5,469
32,920
(3,604)
695
42,362
27,491
(1,863)
661
31,475
Nonperforming Loans and Nonperforming Assets
Detail of nonperforming loans and nonperforming assets follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Loans on nonaccrual status*
16,793
15,892
Loans past due 90-days-or-more and still on accrual**
203
Total nonperforming loans
16,996
16,059
Total nonperforming assets
18,358
17,450
Credit Quality Ratios - Total Company:
Nonperforming loans to total loans
0.46
%
0.42
Nonperforming assets to total loans (including OREO)
0.49
Nonperforming assets to total assets
0.39
0.36
Credit Quality Ratios - Core Bank:
0.50
0.40
*Loans on nonaccrual status include impaired loans.
**Loans past due 90-days-or-more and still accruing consist of PCI loans or smaller balance consumer loans.
24
The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90-days-or-more and still on accrual by class of loans:
Past Due 90-Days-or-More
Nonaccrual
and Still Accruing Interest*
11,731
10,955
818
852
2,674
2,725
77
1,268
1,069
60
81
85
* Loans past due 90-days-or-more and still accruing consist of PCI loans or smaller balance consumer loans.
Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90-days-or-more and still on accrual include both smaller balance, primarily retail, homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans. Nonaccrual loans are typically returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and held current for six consecutive months and future contractual payments are reasonably assured. Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) on nonaccrual status are reviewed for return to accrual status on an individual basis, with additional consideration given to performance under the modified terms.
Delinquent Loans
The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in loans by class of loans:
30 - 59
60 - 89
90 or More
Days
Delinquent
Delinquent*
Delinquent**
Current
2,205
420
1,263
3,888
965,817
35
40
164,702
140
416
1,048,552
440
442
907
340,704
30
14,614
55,940
110
279
18,936
3,056
657
2,239
5,952
3,661,717
8,350
2,322
1,508
231
1,861
30,160
9,858
10,211
32,496
12,914
888
2,361
16,163
3,694,213
Delinquency ratio***
0.35
0.02
0.06
0.44
*All loans past due 90-days-or-more, excluding PCI loans and small balance consumer loans, were on nonaccrual status.
**Delinquent status may be determined by either the number of days past due or number of payments past due. Easy Advances do not have a contractual due date but are eligible for delinquency consideration three weeks after the taxpayer customer’s tax return is submitted to the applicable tax authority.
***Represents total loans 30-days-or-more past due by aging category divided by total loans.
1,696
337
2,521
4,554
995,594
46
156,559
417
425
1,060,071
342
258,684
316
160
494
970
340,315
13,396
159
161
642
114
106
19,439
2,649
608
3,564
6,821
3,765,010
1,751
304
2,137
30,115
36,810
4,400
912
3,646
8,958
3,801,820
0.12
0.10
0.24
**Delinquent status may be determined by either the number of days past due or number of payments past due.
Impaired Loans
Information regarding the Bank’s impaired loans follows:
Loans with no allocated Allowance
20,056
21,416
Loans with allocated Allowance
28,914
31,268
Total impaired loans
48,970
52,684
Amount of the Allowance
4,901
4,925
Approximately $2 million and $4 million of impaired loans at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were PCI loans. Approximately $3 million and $3 million of impaired loans at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were formerly PCI loans that became classified as “Impaired” through a post-acquisition troubled debt restructuring.
The following tables present the balance in the Allowance and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio class based on impairment method as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Individually
PCI with
PCI without
Evaluated
Collectively
Post Acquisition
Excluding PCI
Impairment
Allowance
3,250
3,671
150
30,924
936,796
1,129
1,632
162,592
265
253
447
7,414
37
10,711
1,031,487
148
6,847
872
152
1,336
207
270,422
529
3,204
98
2,185
339,237
91
766
129
19,085
4,609
23,089
292
46,660
3,611,298
2,310
7,401
37,461
3,654,005
3,203
3,797
31,908
965,755
2,297
188
65
1,067
1,601
154,481
268
532
7,501
45
11,769
1,041,678
1,164
5,885
120
1,730
118,768
227
1,284
686
258,317
3,225
1,929
339,163
735
19,662
4,616
23,003
309
48,856
3,712,701
3,828
6,446
27,995
3,751,648
The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. The difference between the “Unpaid Principal Balance” and “Recorded Investment” columns represents life-to-date partial write downs/charge offs taken on individual impaired credits.
As of
Cash Basis
Unpaid
Average
Principal
Recorded
Investment
Allocated
Recognized
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded:
12,874
11,892
12,261
29
1,445
1,411
1,394
5,946
4,769
5,153
476
61
1,413
1,350
Consumer
43
Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:
20,848
20,831
3,400
21,204
181
486
6,090
484
6,744
396
401
386
871
870
627
806
51,257
50,832
13,727
12,629
13,050
Non owner occupied
1,399
1,376
1,971
6,610
5,536
7,180
1,358
1,287
2,139
21,595
21,576
3,361
25,069
214
1,124
491
493
73
9,546
7,397
577
543
96
405
406
1,502
619
742
741
171
54,968
63,718
444
Troubled Debt Restructurings
A TDR is a situation where, due to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Bank grants a concession to the borrower that the Bank would not otherwise have considered. In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of their debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed in accordance with the Bank’s internal underwriting policy.
All TDRs are considered “Impaired,” including PCI loans subsequently restructured. The majority of the Bank’s commercial related and construction TDRs involve a restructuring of financing terms such as a reduction in the payment amount to require only interest and escrow (if required) and/or extending the maturity date of the debt. The substantial majority of the Bank’s residential real estate TDR concessions involve reducing the client’s loan payment through a rate reduction for a set period based on the borrower’s ability to service the modified loan payment. Retail loans may also be classified as TDRs due to legal modifications, such as bankruptcies.
Nonaccrual loans modified as TDRs typically remain on nonaccrual status and continue to be reported as nonperforming loans for a minimum of six consecutive months. Accruing loans modified as TDRs are evaluated for nonaccrual status based on a current evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition and ability and willingness to service the modified debt. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $9 million and $10 million of TDRs were on nonaccrual status.
Detail of TDRs differentiated by loan type and accrual status follows:
Troubled Debt
Restructurings on
Nonaccrual Status
Accrual Status
Restructurings
Number of
March 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands)
Residential real estate
6,725
20,748
270
27,473
2,382
7,830
10,212
797
206
Total troubled debt restructurings
9,332
29,430
299
38,762
December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands)
79
7,199
198
21,554
277
28,753
2,430
8,835
11,265
804
881
533
9,860
221
31,726
308
41,586
The Bank considers a TDR to be performing to its modified terms if the loan is in accrual status and not past due 30-days-or-more as of the reporting date. A summary of the categories of TDR loan modifications outstanding and respective performance under modified terms at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 follows:
Performing to
Not Performing to
Modified Terms
Residential real estate loans (including home equity loans):
Interest only payments
485
643
Rate reduction
17,961
5,924
23,885
Principal deferral
314
271
585
Legal modification
895
31
1,465
2,360
Total residential TDRs
176
19,328
8,145
Commercial related and construction/land development loans:
2,626
403
3,029
4,051
225
4,276
2,006
1,978
3,984
Total commercial TDRs
8,683
2,606
11,289
197
28,011
102
10,751
155
18,125
57
6,213
205
24,338
616
306
922
2,039
2,845
174
19,702
103
9,051
2,666
3,079
228
4,997
2,737
2,020
4,757
10,172
2,661
12,833
29,874
111
11,712
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 72% and 72% of the Bank’s TDRs were performing according to their modified terms. The Bank had provided $4 million and $4 million of specific reserve allocations to clients whose loan terms have been modified in TDRs as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The Bank had no commitments to lend any additional material amounts to its existing TDR relationships at March 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016.
A summary of the categories of TDR loan modifications by respective performance as of March 31, 2017 and 2016 that were modified during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 follows:
March 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands)
112
88
168
568
713
The tables above are inclusive of loans that were TDRs at the end of previous periods and were re-modified, e.g., a maturity date extension during the current period.
As of March 31, 2017 and 2016, 100% and 20% of the Bank’s TDRs that occurred during the first quarters of 2017 and 2016 were performing according to their modified terms. The Bank provided approximately $29,000 and $17,000 in specific reserve allocations to clients whose loan terms were modified in TDRs during the first quarters of 2017 and 2016.
There was no significant change between the pre and post modification loan balances for the three months ending March 31, 2017 and 2016.
32
The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings within the previous 12 months of March 31, 2017 and 2016 and for which there was a payment default during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
513
2,306
2,819
Foreclosures
The following table presents the carrying amount of foreclosed properties held at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 as a result of the Bank obtaining physical possession of such properties:
Total other real estate owned
The following table presents the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Recorded investment in consumer residential real estate mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure
1,152
1,677
The Company’s RPG segment offered its EA product through the TRS division during the first quarters of 2017 and 2016. The Company based its provision for loss for EAs primarily on prior year IRS funding patterns.
Additional information regarding EAs follows:
Easy Advances originated
328,523
123,230
Provision for Easy Advances
Provision to total Easy Advances originated
2.62
2.90
Easy Advances net charge-offs
860
Easy Advances net charge-offs to total Easy Advances originated
0.26
0.33
34
6. DEPOSITS
Ending deposit balances at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Demand
935,245
872,709
Money market accounts
562,827
541,622
Brokered money market accounts
350,862
360,597
Savings
174,995
164,410
Individual retirement accounts*
43,250
42,642
Time deposits, $250 and over*
38,691
37,200
Other certificates of deposit*
143,838
140,894
Brokered certificates of deposit*
27,814
28,666
Total Core Bank interest-bearing deposits
2,277,522
Total Core Bank noninterest-bearing deposits
934,787
943,459
Total Core Bank deposits
3,212,309
3,132,199
Republic Processing Group ("RPG"):
1,025
Total RPG interest-bearing deposits
Brokered prepaid card deposits
4,568
Other noninterest-bearing deposits
130,882
28,478
Total RPG noninterest-bearing deposits
135,450
28,493
Total RPG deposits
136,475
*Represents a time deposit.
The following table summarizes deposits acquired in the Company’s May 17, 2016 Cornerstone acquisition, finalized as of October 1, 2016:
Contractual Principal
Fair Value Adjustment
59,507
53,773
12,352
3,897
3,910
3,385
3,397
19,343
19,410
Total interest-bearing deposits
Total noninterest-bearing deposits
7. SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE AND OTHER SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase consist of short-term excess funds from correspondent banks, repurchase agreements and overnight liabilities to deposit clients arising from the Bank’s treasury management program. While comparable to deposits in their transactional nature, these overnight liabilities to clients are in the form of repurchase agreements. Repurchase agreements collateralized by securities are treated as financings; accordingly, the securities involved with the agreements are recorded as assets and are held by a safekeeping agent and the obligations to repurchase the securities are reflected as liabilities. Should the fair value of currently pledged securities fall below the associated repurchase agreements, the Bank would be required to pledge additional securities. To mitigate the risk of under collateralization, the Bank typically pledges at least two percent more in securities than the associated repurchase agreements. All such securities are under the Bank’s control.
At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, all securities sold under agreements to repurchase had overnight maturities. Information regarding securities sold under agreements to repurchase follows:
Outstanding balance at end of period
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
0.05
Fair value of securities pledged:
115,726
116,025
35,996
45,894
46,018
41,155
Total securities pledged
197,740
203,074
Average outstanding balance during the period
218,412
407,698
Average interest rate during the period
Maximum outstanding at any month end during the period
183,709
367,373
8. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES
At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, FHLB advances were as follows:
Overnight advances
75,000
285,000
Variable interest rate advance indexed to 3-Month LIBOR plus 0.14% due on December 20, 2017
Fixed interest rate advances
382,500
457,500
Putable fixed interest rate advances
50,000
Total FHLB advances
Each FHLB advance is payable at its maturity date, with a prepayment penalty for fixed rate advances that are paid off earlier than maturity. FHLB advances are collateralized by a blanket pledge of eligible real estate loans. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Republic had available borrowing capacity of $683 million and $378 million, respectively, from the FHLB. In addition to its borrowing capacity with the FHLB, Republic also had unsecured lines of credit totaling $125 million and $150 million available through various other financial institutions as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Aggregate future principal payments on FHLB advances based on contractual maturity and the weighted average cost of such advances are detailed below:
Weighted
Year (dollars in thousands)
Rate
2017 (Overnight)
0.90
2017 (Term)
55,000
1.32
2018
117,500
1.53
2019
1.80
2020
90,000
1.81
2021
20,000
1.86
2022
Thereafter
2.14
1.54
Due to their nature, the Bank considers average balance information more meaningful than period-end balances for its overnight borrowings from the FHLB. Information regarding short-term overnight FHLB advances follows:
0.64
109,333
7,857
0.69
320,000
The following table illustrates real estate loans pledged to collateralize advances and letters of credit with the FHLB:
First lien, single family residential real estate
1,147,090
1,172,161
Home equity lines of credit
304,603
300,681
Multi-family commercial real estate
14,913
9. OFF BALANCE SHEET RISKS, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Company, in the normal course of business, is party to financial instruments with off balance sheet risk. These financial instruments primarily include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the potential future obligations of the Company pursuant to those financial instruments. Creditworthiness for all instruments is evaluated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the Company’s credit policies. Collateral from the client may be required based on the Company’s credit evaluation of the client and may include business assets of commercial clients, as well as personal property and real estate of individual clients or guarantors.
The Company also extends binding commitments to clients and prospective clients. Such commitments assure a borrower of financing for a specified period of time at a specified rate. Additionally, the Company makes binding purchase commitments to third-party loan correspondent originators. These commitments assure that the Company will purchase a loan from such correspondent originators at a specific price for a specific period of time. The risk to the Company under such loan commitments is limited by the terms of the contracts. For example, the Company may not be obligated to advance funds if the client’s financial condition deteriorates or if the client fails to meet specific covenants.
An approved but unfunded loan commitment represents a potential credit risk and a liquidity risk, since the Company’s client(s) may demand immediate cash that would require funding. In addition, unfunded loan commitments represent interest rate risk as market interest rates may rise above the rate committed to the Company’s client. Since a portion of these loan commitments normally expire unused, the total amount of outstanding commitments at any point in time may not require future funding.
The following table presents the Company’s commitments, exclusive of Mortgage Banking loan commitments, for each period ended:
Unused warehouse lines of credit
499,100
453,110
Unused home equity lines of credit
353,974
341,434
Unused loan commitments - other
635,659
560,629
Commitments to purchase loans*
3,176
Standby letters of credit
5,679
15,568
Total commitments
1,494,412
1,373,917
*Commitments made through the Bank's Correspondent Lending channel.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a client to a third party. The terms and risk of loss involved in issuing standby letters of credit are similar to those involved in issuing loan commitments and extending credit. In addition to credit risk, the Company also has liquidity risk associated with standby letters of credit because funding for these obligations could be required immediately. The Company does not deem this risk to be material.
10. FAIR VALUE
Fair value represents the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The Bank used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value:
Securities available for sale: Quoted market prices in an active market are available for the Bank’s Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) mutual fund investment and fall within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Except for the Bank’s CRA mutual fund investment, its private label mortgage backed security and its TRUP investment, the fair value of securities available for sale is typically determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).
The Bank’s private label mortgage backed security remains illiquid, and as such, the Bank classifies this security as a Level 3 security in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. Based on this determination, the Bank utilized an income valuation model (present value model) approach in determining the fair value of this security.
See in this section of the filing under Footnote 3 “Investment Securities” for additional discussion regarding the Bank’s private label mortgage backed security.
The Company acquired its TRUP investment in November 2015 and considered the most recent bid price for the same instrument to approximate market value at March 31, 2017. The Company’s TRUP investment is considered highly illiquid and also valued using Level 3 inputs, as the most recent bid price for this instrument is not always considered generally observable.
Mortgage loans held for sale, at fair value: The fair value of mortgage loans held for sale is determined using quoted secondary market prices. Mortgage loans held for sale are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Consumer loans held for sale, at fair value: During 2016, RCS initiated an installment loan program and elected to carry all loans originated through this program at fair value. Such loans are generally sold within 21 days of origination, with their fair value based on contractual terms, Level 3 inputs.
Mortgage Banking derivatives: Mortgage Banking derivatives used in the ordinary course of business primarily consist of mandatory forward sales contracts (“forward contracts”) and interest rate lock loan commitments. The fair value of the Bank’s derivative instruments is primarily measured by obtaining pricing from broker-dealers recognized to be market participants. The pricing is derived from market observable inputs that can generally be verified and do not typically involve significant judgment by the Bank. Forward contracts and rate-lock loan commitments are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Interest rate swap agreements: Interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company values its interest rate swaps using a third-party valuation service and classifies such valuations as Level 2. Valuations of these interest rate swaps are also received from the relevant counterparty and validated against the Company’s calculations. The Company has considered counterparty credit risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap assets and has considered its own credit risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap liabilities.
39
Impaired loans: Collateral-dependent impaired loans generally reflect partial charge-downs to their respective fair value, which is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals or broker price opinions (“BPOs”). These appraisals or BPOs may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the process by the independent experts to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Non-real estate collateral may be valued using an appraisal, net book value per the borrower’s financial statements or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business, resulting in a Level 3 fair value classification. Collateral-dependent loans are evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.
Other real estate owned: Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals or BPOs. These appraisals or BPOs may utilize a single approach or a combination of approaches, including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the process by the independent experts to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments may be significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.
Appraisals for collateral-dependent impaired loans, impaired premises and other real estate owned are performed by certified general appraisers (for commercial properties) or certified residential appraisers (for residential properties) whose qualifications and licenses have been reviewed and verified by the Bank. Once the appraisal is received, a member of the Bank’s Credit Administration Department reviews the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal, as well as the overall resulting fair value in comparison with independent data sources, such as recent market data or industry-wide statistics. On at least an annual basis, the Bank performs a back test of collateral appraisals by comparing actual selling prices on recent collateral sales to the most recent appraisal of such collateral. Back tests are performed for each collateral class, e.g., residential real estate or commercial real estate, and may lead to additional adjustments to the value of unliquidated collateral of similar class.
Mortgage servicing rights: On at least a quarterly basis, MSRs are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the MSRs as compared to carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an individual tranche exceeds fair value, impairment is recorded and the respective individual tranche is carried at fair value. If the carrying amount of an individual tranche does not exceed fair value, impairment is reversed if previously recognized and the carrying value of the individual tranche is based on the amortization method. The valuation model utilizes assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income and can generally be validated against available market data (Level 2). There were no MSR tranches carried at fair value at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial assets and liabilities for which the Bank has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements at
March 31, 2017 Using:
Quoted Prices in
Significant
Active Markets
for Identical
Observable
Unobservable
Assets
Inputs
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Financial assets:
515,930
7,882
Mortgage loans held for sale
Consumer loans held for sale
Rate lock loan commitments
618
Interest rate swap agreements
137
Financial liabilities:
Mandatory forward contracts
71
436
December 31, 2016 Using:
470,843
7,977
204
597
All transfers between levels are generally recognized at the end of each quarter. There were no transfers into or out of Level 1, 2 or 3 assets during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
41
Private Label Mortgage Backed Security
The following table presents a reconciliation of the Bank’s private label mortgage backed security measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the periods ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:
5,132
Total gains or losses included in earnings:
Net change in unrealized gain
Principal paydowns
(148)
4,983
The fair value of the Bank’s single private label mortgage backed security is supported by analysis prepared by an independent third party. The third party’s approach to determining fair value involved several steps: 1) detailed collateral analysis of the underlying mortgages, including consideration of geographic location, original loan-to-value and the weighted average Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”) score of the borrowers; 2) collateral performance projections for each pool of mortgages underlying the security (probability of default, severity of default, and prepayment probabilities); and 3) discounted cash flow modeling.
The significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurement of the Bank’s single private label mortgage backed security are prepayment rates, probability of default and loss severity in the event of default. Significant fluctuations in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower/higher fair value measurement.
The following tables present quantitative information about recurring Level 3 fair value measurement inputs for the Bank’s single private label mortgage backed security at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable Inputs
Range
Discounted cash flow
(1) Constant prepayment rate
2.0% - 6.5%
(2) Probability of default
3.0% - 9.0%
(3) Loss severity
60% - 90%
42
The Company invested in its TRUP in November 2015. The following table presents a reconciliation of the Company’s TRUP measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:
3,405
Net change in unrealized loss
(5)
The fair value of the Company’s TRUP investment is based on the most recent bid price for this instrument, as provided by a third-party broker.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
The Bank has elected the fair value option for mortgage loans held for sale. These loans are intended for sale and the Bank believes that the fair value is the best indicator of the resolution of these loans. Interest income is recorded based on the contractual terms of the loans and in accordance with Bank policy for such instruments. None of these loans were past due 90-days-or-more or on nonaccrual as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the aggregate fair value, contractual balance, and unrealized gain was as follows:
Aggregate fair value
Contractual balance
5,106
11,568
Unrealized gain
The total amount of gains and losses from changes in fair value included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 for mortgage loans held for sale are presented in the following table:
Interest income
Change in fair value
(7)
Total included in earnings
Consumer Loans Held for Sale
During 2016, RCS initiated an installment loan program and elected to carry all loans originated through this program at fair value. Such loans are generally sold within 21 days of origination, with their fair value based on contractual terms. Interest income is recorded based on the contractual terms of the loan and in accordance with Bank policy for such instruments. None of these loans were past due 90-days-or-more or on nonaccrual as of March 31, 2017 and 2016.
A reconciliation of the Company’s consumer loans held for sale measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 is included in Footnote 4 of this section of the filing.
The significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurement of the Bank’s installment loans are the net contractual premiums and level of loans sold at a discount price. Significant fluctuations in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower/higher fair value measurement.
The following table presents quantitative information about recurring Level 3 fair value measurement inputs for installment loans as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Contractual Terms
(1) Net Premium
0.9%
(2) Discounted Sales
5.0%
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 the aggregate fair value, contractual balance, and unrealized gain on consumer loans held for sale, at fair value, was as follows:
3,597
2,084
The total amount of net gains from changes in fair value included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 for consumer loans held for sale, at fair value, are presented in the following table:
44
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
Impaired loans:
4,151
2,496
535
Total impaired loans*
7,220
Other real estate owned:
630
4,787
2,643
426
7,864
400
* The difference between the carrying value and the fair value of impaired loans measured at fair value is reconciled in a subsequent table of this Footnote.
The following tables present quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
(Weighted
Average)
Impaired loans - residential real estate owner occupied
Sales comparison approach
Adjustments determined for differences between comparable sales
0% - 53% (6%)
Impaired loans - residential real estate nonowner occupied
0% - 45% (18%)
Impaired loans - commercial real estate
1,089
0% - 49% (6%)
1,407
Income approach
Adjustments for differences between net operating income expectations
17% (17%)
Impaired loans - home equity
0% - 29% (13%)
Other real estate owned - residential real estate
24% - 27% (25%)
0% (0%)
1,214
3% - 49% (30%)
1,429
0% - 29% (16%)
47
Collateral-dependent impaired loans are generally measured for impairment using the fair value for reasonable disposition of the underlying collateral. The Bank’s practice is to obtain new or updated appraisals or BPOs on the loans subject to the initial impairment review and then to evaluate the need for an update to this value on an as necessary or possibly annual basis thereafter (depending on the market conditions impacting the value of the collateral). The Bank may discount the valuation amount as necessary for selling costs and past due real estate taxes. If a new or updated appraisal or BPO is not available at the time of a loan’s impairment review, the Bank may apply a discount to the existing value of an old valuation to reflect the property’s current estimated value if it is believed to have deteriorated in either: (i) the physical or economic aspects of the subject property or (ii) material changes in market conditions. The impairment review generally results in a partial charge-off of the loan if fair value less selling costs are below the loan’s carrying value. Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy when impairment is determined using the fair value method.
Impaired collateral-dependent loans are as follows:
Carrying amount of loans measured at fair value
6,435
6,963
Estimated selling costs considered in carrying amount
813
936
Valuation allowance
(28)
Total fair value
Provisions for loss on collateral-dependent, impaired loans
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned, which is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, is periodically assessed for impairment based on fair value at the reporting date. Fair value is determined from external appraisals or BPOs using judgments and estimates of external professionals. Many of these inputs are not observable and, accordingly, these measurements are classified as Level 3.
Details of other real estate owned carrying value and write downs follow:
Other real estate owned carried at fair value
Other real estate owned carried at cost
732
991
Total carrying value of other real estate owned
Other real estate owned write-downs during the period
48
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of all financial instruments at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 follows:
March 31, 2017:
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets:
Securities held to maturity
3,648,482
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
NA
10,147
Liabilities:
Noninterest-bearing deposits
Transaction deposits
2,024,954
Time deposits
253,593
252,543
463,357
32,174
858
December 31, 2016:
3,757,698
10,356
1,939,338
249,417
248,684
798,594
30,821
948
NA - Not applicable
49
Fair value estimates are based on existing on and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the Bank’s estimates.
The assumptions used in the estimation of the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments are explained below. Where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using discounted cash flow and other valuation techniques. Discounted cash flows can be significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. The following fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and should not be considered representative of the liquidation value of the Company’s financial instruments, but rather a good-faith estimate of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company.
In addition to those previously disclosed, the following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents — The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values and are classified as Level 1.
Consumer loans held for sale, at lower of cost or fair value – Consumer loans held for sale at the lower of cost or fair value constitute consumer loans generally sold within two business days of origination. The carrying amounts of these loans, due to their nature, approximate fair value and result in a Level 2 classification.
Loans, net of Allowance — The fair value of loans is calculated using discounted cash flows by loan type resulting in a Level 3 classification. The discount rate used to determine the present value of the loan portfolio is an estimated market rate that reflects the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan portfolio without considering widening credit spreads due to market illiquidity. The estimated maturity is based on the Bank’s historical experience with repayments adjusted to estimate the effect of current market conditions. The Allowance is considered a reasonable discount for credit risk. The methods utilized to estimate the fair value of loans do not necessarily represent an exit price.
Federal Home Loan Bank stock — It is not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.
Accrued interest receivable/payable — The carrying amounts of accrued interest, due to their short-term nature, approximate fair value and result in a Level 2 classification.
Deposits — Fair values for time deposits have been determined using discounted cash flows. The discount rate used is based on estimated market rates for deposits of similar remaining maturities and are classified as Level 2. The carrying amounts of all other deposits, due to their short-term nature, approximate their fair values and are also classified as Level 2.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings — The carrying amount for securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings generally maturing within ninety days approximates its fair value resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances — The fair value of the FHLB advances is obtained from the FHLB and is calculated by discounting contractual cash flows using an estimated interest rate based on the current rates available to the Company for debt of similar remaining maturities and collateral terms resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Subordinated note — The fair value for the subordinated note is calculated using discounted cash flows based upon current market spreads to LIBOR for debt of similar remaining maturities and collateral terms resulting in a Level 2 classification.
The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the respective period ends. Although management is not aware of any factors that would dramatically affect the estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since that date and, therefore, estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented.
50
11. MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES
Activity for mortgage loans held for sale, at fair value, was as follows:
4,083
33,245
36,992
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans held for sale
(40,691)
(35,022)
977
7,148
The following table presents the components of Mortgage Banking income:
Net gain realized on sale of mortgage loans held for sale
788
841
Net change in fair value recognized on loans held for sale
Net change in fair value recognized on rate lock loan commitments
275
Net change in fair value recognized on forward contracts
(123)
(80)
Net gain recognized
Loan servicing income
536
471
(353)
(305)
Net servicing income recognized
Total Mortgage Banking income
Activity for capitalized mortgage servicing rights was as follows:
5,180
4,912
Additions
284
Amortized to expense
5,158
4,891
There was no balance or activity in the valuation allowance for capitalized mortgage servicing rights for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Other information relating to mortgage servicing rights follows:
Fair value of mortgage servicing rights portfolio
7,478
Monthly weighted average prepayment rate of unpaid principal balance*
Discount rate
Weighted average default rate
Weighted average life in years
* Rates are applied to individual tranches with similar characteristics.
Mortgage Banking derivatives used in the ordinary course of business primarily consist of mandatory forward sales contracts and interest rate lock loan commitments. Mandatory forward contracts represent future commitments to deliver loans at a specified price and date and are used to manage interest rate risk on loan commitments and mortgage loans held for sale. Interest rate lock loan commitments represent commitments to fund loans at a specific rate. These derivatives involve underlying items, such as interest rates, and are designed to transfer risk. Substantially all of these instruments expire within 90 days from the date of issuance. Notional amounts are amounts on which calculations and payments are based, but which do not represent credit exposure, as credit exposure is limited to the amounts required to be received or paid.
Mandatory forward contracts also contain an element of risk in that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of such agreements. In the event the counterparties fail to deliver commitments or are unable to fulfill their obligations, the Bank could potentially incur significant additional costs by replacing the positions at then current market rates. The Bank manages its risk of exposure by limiting counterparties to those banks and institutions deemed appropriate by management and the Board of Directors. The Bank does not expect any counterparty to default on their obligations and therefore, the Bank does not expect to incur any cost related to counterparty default.
The Bank is exposed to interest rate risk on loans held for sale and rate lock loan commitments. As market interest rates fluctuate, the fair value of mortgage loans held for sale and rate lock commitments will decline or increase. To offset this interest rate risk the Bank enters into derivatives, such as mandatory forward contracts to sell loans. The fair value of these mandatory forward contracts will fluctuate as market interest rates fluctuate, and the change in the value of these instruments is expected to largely, though not entirely, offset the change in fair value of loans held for sale and rate lock commitments. The objective of this activity is to minimize the exposure to losses on rate-loan lock commitments and loans held for sale due to market interest rate fluctuations. The net effect of derivatives on earnings will depend on risk management activities and a variety of other factors, including: market interest rate volatility; the amount of rate lock commitments that close; the ability to fill the forward contracts before expiration; and the time period required to close and sell loans.
The following table includes the notional amounts and fair values of mortgage loans held for sale at fair value and mortgage banking derivatives as of the period ends presented:
Notional
Included in Mortgage loans held for sale:
Included in other assets:
32,630
19,521
25,618
Included in other liabilities:
30,367
52
12. INTEREST RATE SWAPS
Interest rate swap derivatives are reported at fair value in other assets or other liabilities. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a cash flow hedging relationship. For a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative’s unrealized gain or loss is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”). For derivatives not designated as hedges, the gain or loss is recognized in current period earnings.
Interest Rate Swaps Used as Cash Flow Hedges
The Bank entered into two interest rate swap agreements (“swaps”) during 2013 as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. The Bank designated the swaps as cash flow hedges intended to reduce the variability in cash flows attributable to either FHLB advances tied to the 3-month LIBOR or the overall changes in cash flows on certain money market deposit accounts tied to 1-month LIBOR. The counterparty for both swaps met the Bank’s credit standards and the Bank believes that the credit risk inherent in the swap contracts is not significant.
The swaps were determined to be fully effective during all periods presented; therefore, no amount of ineffectiveness was included in net income. The aggregate fair value of the swaps is recorded in other liabilities with changes in fair value recorded in OCI. The amount included in AOCI would be reclassified to current earnings should the hedge no longer be considered effective. The Bank expects the hedges to remain fully effective during the remaining term of the swaps.
The following table reflects information about swaps designated as cash flow hedges as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
Pay
Receive
Assets /
Gain (Loss)
Term
(Liabilities)
AOCI
in AOCI
Interest rate swap on money market deposits
2.17
1M LIBOR
12/2013 - 12/2020
(135)
(88)
(186)
(121)
Interest rate swap on FHLB advance
2.33
3M LIBOR
(164)
(207)
(195)
(256)
The following table reflects the total interest expense recorded on these swap transactions in the consolidated statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:
Total interest expense on swap transactions
The following table presents the net gains (losses) recorded in OCI and the consolidated statements of income relating to the swaps designated as cash flow hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:
Gains (losses) recognized in OCI on derivative (effective portion)
Losses reclassified from OCI on derivative (effective portion)
(66)
(87)
Gains (losses) recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion)
The estimated net amount of the existing losses reported in AOCI at March 31, 2017 expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months is $198,000.
Non-hedge Interest Rate Swaps
The Bank enters into interest rate swaps to facilitate client transactions and meet their financing needs. Upon entering into these instruments to meet client needs, the Bank enters into offsetting positions in order to minimize the Bank’s interest rate risk. These swaps are derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments, and therefore changes in fair value are reported in current year earnings.
Interest rate swap contracts involve the risk of dealing with counterparties and their ability to meet contractual terms. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is positive, this generally indicates that the counter party or client owes the Bank, and results in credit risk to the Bank. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is negative, the Bank owes the client or counterparty, and therefore, has no credit risk.
A summary of the Bank’s interest rate swaps related to clients as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is included in the following table:
Bank Position
Interest rate swaps with Bank clients
Pay variable/receive fixed
31,553
Offsetting interest rate swaps with institutional swap dealer
Pay fixed/receive variable
(49)
(55)
63,106
The Bank is required to pledge securities as collateral when the Bank is in a net loss position for all swaps with dealer counterparties when such net loss positions exceed $250,000. The fair value of cash or investment securities pledged as collateral by the Bank to cover such net loss positions totaled $800,000 and $1.8 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
13. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Class A and Class B Shares participate equally in undistributed earnings. The difference in earnings per share between the two classes of common stock results solely from the 10% per share cash dividend premium paid on Class A Common Stock over that paid on Class B Common Stock.
A reconciliation of the combined Class A and Class B Common Stock numerators and denominators of the earnings per share and diluted earnings per share computations is presented below:
Weighted average shares outstanding
20,915
20,904
Effect of dilutive securities
105
Average shares outstanding including dilutive securities
20,996
21,009
Basic earnings per share:
Diluted earnings per share:
Stock options excluded from the detailed earnings per share calculation because their impact was antidilutive are as follows:
Antidilutive stock options
10,500
Average antidilutive stock options
14. STOCK PLANS AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
In January 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the Republic Bancorp, Inc. 2015 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”), which became effective April 2015 when the Company’s shareholders approved the 2015 Plan. The 2015 Plan replaced the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, which expired March 2015.
The number of authorized shares under the 2015 Plan is fixed at 3,000,000, with such number subject to adjustment in the event of certain events, such as stock dividends, stock splits or the like. There is a minimum three-year vesting period for awards granted to employees under the 2015 Plan that vest based solely on the completion of a specified period of service, with options generally exercisable five to six years after the issue date. Stock options generally must be exercised within one year from the date the options become exercisable and have an exercise price that is at least equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock on their grant date. Forfeitures of stock-based awards are accounted for when incurred in lieu of using forfeiture estimates.
All shares issued under the above-mentioned plans were from authorized and reserved unissued shares. The Company has a sufficient number of authorized and reserved unissued shares to satisfy all anticipated option exercises. There are no Class B stock options outstanding or available for exercise under the Company’s plans.
Stock Options
The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes based stock option valuation model. This model requires the input of subjective assumptions that will usually have a significant impact on the fair value estimate. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of Republic’s stock and other factors. Expected dividends are based on dividend trends and the market price of Republic’s stock price at grant. Republic uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of grant.
All share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense over the service period (generally the vesting period) in the consolidated financial statements based on their fair values.
The following table summarizes stock option activity from January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017:
Options
Remaining
Aggregate
Exercise
Contractual
Intrinsic
Price
Outstanding, January 1, 2016
323,400
24.40
Granted
5,000
26.43
Exercised
(4,000)
20.12
Forfeited or expired
(11,800)
24.47
Outstanding, December 31, 2016
312,600
24.49
3.77
4,705,807
Outstanding, January 1, 2017
(2,000)
16.61
Outstanding, March 31, 2017
310,600
24.54
3.55
3,060,357
Fully vested and unvested
Exercisable (vested) at March 31, 2017
2,000
24.93
0.11
18,920
Information related to stock options for each period follows:
Three Months Ended March 31,
Intrinsic value of options exercised
Cash received from options exercised, net of shares redeemed
Weighted-average fair value per share of options granted
Restricted Stock Awards
Restricted stock awards generally vest five to six years after issue, with accelerated vesting due to “change in control” or “death or disability of a participant” as defined and outlined in the 2015 Plan.
The following table summarizes restricted stock awards activity from January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017:
Restricted
Stock Awards
Weighted-Average
Grant Date Fair Value
79,000
20.02
Forfeited
19.85
Earned and issued
77,000
4,803
35.12
(3,702)
37.54
78,101
20.27
Vested at March 31, 2017
Performance Stock Units
The Company first granted performance stock units (“PSUs”) under the 2015 Plan in January 2016. Shares of stock underlying the PSUs may be earned over a four-year performance period commencing on January 1, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2020 as follows:
If the Company achieves a Return on Average Assets (“ROAA”), as defined in the award agreement, of 1.25% for a calendar year in the performance period, then between March 1 and March 15 of the following year, provided that the recipient is still employed in good standing on the payment date, the Company will issue shares of fully-vested stock to the participant equal to 50% of the number of the PSUs initially granted to the participant; and
If the ROAA of 1.25% is met again at the end of another calendar year during the remaining term of the performance period, the Company will similarly issue fully vested stock in an amount equal to the remaining 50% of the initial PSUs granted to the participant.
The following table summarizes PSU activity from January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2017:
Performance
Stock Units
23.13
Expense Related to the 2015 Stock Incentive Plan
The Company recorded expense related to the 2015 Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 as follows:
Stock option expense
Restricted stock award expense
72
Performance stock unit expense
127
Total expense
58
Unrecognized expenses related to unvested awards (net of estimated forfeitures) under the 2015 Plan are estimated as follows:
Stock
Year Ended (in thousands)
191
187
774
251
220
143
15. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
OCI components and related tax effects were as follows:
Available for Sale Securities:
759
2,143
(266)
(750)
Net of tax
1,393
Cash Flow Hedges:
Net unrealized gains (losses)
(484)
(33)
(314)
Total other comprehensive income (loss) components, net of tax
Significant amounts reclassified out of each component of AOCI for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:
Amounts Reclassified From Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
Affected Line Items in the Consolidated
Statements of Income
Interest expense on deposits
(34)
(43)
Interest expense on FHLB advances
(32)
Total derivative losses on cash flow hedges
Income tax expense
(57)
The following is a summary of the AOCI balances, net of tax:
Change
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale
237
459
696
Unrealized gain on security available for sale for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings
740
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedge
Total unrealized gain
December 31, 2015
1,727
1,490
3,217
712
615
(390)
(704)
2,049
3,128
16. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Reportable segments are determined by the type of products and services offered and the level of information provided to the chief operating decision maker, who uses such information to review performance of various components of the business (such as banking centers and business units), which are then aggregated if operating performance, products/services, and clients are similar.
As of March 31, 2017, the Company was divided into four distinct operating segments: Traditional Banking, Warehouse Lending (“Warehouse”), Mortgage Banking and Republic Processing Group (“RPG”). Management considers the first three segments to collectively constitute “Core Bank” or “Core Banking” activities. Correspondent Lending operations are considered part of Traditional Banking. The RPG segment includes the following divisions: Tax Refund Solutions (“TRS”), Republic Credit Solutions (“RCS”) and Republic Payment Solutions (“RPS”). TRS generates the majority of RPG’s income, with the relatively smaller divisions of RPG, RPS and RCS, considered immaterial for separate and independent segment reporting. All divisions of the RPG segment operate through the Bank.
The nature of segment operations and the primary drivers of net revenues by reportable segment are provided below:
Segment:
Nature of Operations:
Primary Drivers of Net Revenues:
Traditional Banking
Provides traditional banking products to clients primarily in its market footprint via its network of banking centers and to clients outside of its market footprint primarily via its digital and Correspondent Lending delivery channels.
Loans, investments and deposits
Core Banking
Warehouse Lending
Provides short-term, revolving credit facilities to mortgage bankers across the Nation.
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit
Mortgage Banking
Primarily originates, sells and services long-term, single family, first lien residential real estate loans primarily to clients in its market footprint.
Loan sales and servicing
The TRS division facilitates the receipt and payment of federal and state tax refund products. The RPS division offers general-purpose reloadable cards. The RCS division offers credit products. RPG products are primarily provided to clients outside of the Bank’s market footprint.
Refund transfers and unsecured, small-dollar
consumer loans
The accounting policies used for Republic’s reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in the Company’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Segment performance is evaluated using operating income. Goodwill is allocated to the Traditional Banking segment. Income taxes are generally allocated based on income before income tax expense unless specific segment allocations can be reasonably made. Transactions among reportable segments are made at carrying value.
Segment information for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Republic
Traditional
Warehouse
Mortgage
Core
Processing
Banking
Lending
Group
Company
Net interest income
32,661
3,900
36,628
19,810
467
Other noninterest income
6,521
6,540
750
7,290
1,173
7,700
17,223
30,090
777
1,215
32,082
6,857
Income before income tax expense
8,625
3,355
12,005
18,066
2,262
1,227
3,498
6,556
6,363
2,128
8,507
11,510
Segment end of period assets
4,017,173
493,127
15,080
4,525,380
139,412
Net interest margin
3.30
3.57
NM
3.33
4.99
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
28,608
2,655
31,295
8,139
480
6,110
6,207
6,263
1,353
7,468
17,453
24,875
1,240
26,810
5,731
9,363
1,947
11,455
15,173
2,613
723
3,387
5,506
6,750
8,068
9,667
3,711,315
393,532
12,965
4,117,812
128,953
4,246,765
3.08
3.63
3.12
3.78
Segment assets are reported as of the respective period ends while income and margin data are reported for the respective periods.
NM — Not Meaningful
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Republic Bancorp, Inc. (the “Parent Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Republic Bank & Trust Company (“RB&T” or the “Bank”) and Republic Insurance Services, Inc. (the “Captive”). The Bank is a Kentucky-based, state chartered non-member financial institution that provides both traditional and non-traditional banking products through four distinct operating segments using a multitude of delivery channels. While the Bank operates primarily in its market footprint, its non-brick-and-mortar delivery channels allow it to reach clients across the United States.
The Captive is a Nevada-based, wholly-owned insurance subsidiary of the Company. The Captive provides property and casualty insurance coverage to the Company and the Bank as well as 10 other third-party insurance captives for which insurance may not be available or economically feasible.
Republic Bancorp Capital Trust (“RBCT”) is a Delaware statutory business trust that is a wholly-owned unconsolidated finance subsidiary of Republic Bancorp, Inc.
All companies are collectively referred to as (“Republic” or the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Republic should be read in conjunction with Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
As used in this filing, the terms “Republic,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Republic Bancorp, Inc., and, where the context requires, Republic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries; and the term the “Bank” refers to the Company’s subsidiary bank, RB&T.
Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. As forward-looking statements discuss future events or conditions, the statements often include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “target,” “can,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” ”potential,” or similar expressions. Do not rely on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements detail management’s expectations regarding the future and are not guarantees. Forward-looking statements are assumptions based on information known to management only as of the date the statements are made and management may not update them to reflect changes that occur subsequent to the date the statements are made.
Broadly speaking, forward-looking statements include:
projections of revenue, income, expenses, losses, earnings per share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure or other financial items;
descriptions of plans or objectives for future operations, products or services;
forecasts of future economic performance; and
descriptions of assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to the following:
changes in political and economic conditions;
the magnitude and frequency of changes to the Federal Funds Target Rate (“FFTR”) implemented by the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) of the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”);
long-term and short-term interest rate fluctuations as well as the overall steepness of the yield curve;
competitive product and pricing pressures in each of the Company’s business segments;
equity and fixed income market fluctuations;
client bankruptcies and loan defaults;
inflation;
recession;
future acquisitions;
integrations of acquired businesses;
changes in technology;
changes in applicable laws and regulations or the interpretation and enforcement thereof;
changes in fiscal, monetary, regulatory and tax policies;
changes in accounting standards;
monetary fluctuations;
changes to the Company’s overall internal control environment;
success in gaining regulatory approvals when required;
information security breaches or cyber security attacks involving either the Company or one of the Company’s third-party service providers;
as well as other risks and uncertainties reported from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including Part 1 Item 1A “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
BUSINESS SEGMENT COMPOSITION
As of March 31, 2017, the Company was divided into four distinct operating segments: Traditional Banking, Warehouse Lending (“Warehouse”), Mortgage Banking and Republic Processing Group (“RPG”). Management considers the first three segments to collectively constitute “Core Bank” or “Core Banking” activities. Correspondent Lending operations and the Company’s national branchless banking platform, MemoryBank®, are considered part of Traditional Banking. The RPG segment includes the following divisions: Tax Refund Solutions (“TRS”), Republic Credit Solutions (“RCS”) and Republic Payment Solutions (“RPS”). TRS generates the majority of RPG’s income, with the relatively smaller divisions of RPG, RCS and RPS, considered immaterial for separate and independent segment reporting. All divisions of the RPG segment operate through the Bank.
Table 1 — Segment Information
Total assets
For expanded segment financial data see Footnote 16 “Segment Information” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
64
(I) Traditional Banking segment
As of March 31, 2017 and through the date of this filing, generally all Traditional Banking products and services, except for the EarnMore deposit account, were offered through the Company’s traditional RB&T brand. The EarnMore deposit account was offered through the Bank’s national branchless banking platform, MemoryBank.
The Bank’s principal lending activities consist of the following:
Retail Mortgage Lending — Through its retail banking centers, its Correspondent Lending channel and its Internet Banking channel, the Bank originates single family, residential real estate loans. In addition, the Bank originates home equity amortizing loans (“HEALs”) and home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”) through its retail banking centers. Such loans are generally collateralized by owner occupied property.
Commercial Lending — The Bank conducts commercial lending activities primarily through its Commercial and Corporate Banking (the “CCB Department”) and its Business Banking Department.
The CCB Department is composed of the following divisions: Corporate Banking; Commercial Finance; Municipal Lending; and Republic Realty. All credit approvals and processing for the CCB Department are prepared and underwritten through the Bank’s existing Credit Administration Department (“CAD”). Clients are generally located within the Bank’s market footprint, including adjacent areas that are within approximately two-hour drive of a specific market.
The Business Banking Department focuses on locally based small-to-medium sized businesses in the Bank’s market footprint with revenues of $1 million to $20 million. The needs of Business Banking clients range from expansion or acquisition, equipment financing, owner-occupied real estate financing, and operating lines of credit. Business Banking utilizes all appropriate programs of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) to reduce credit risk exposure. Additionally, Business Banking includes making loans to real estate investors for various types of investment properties, including rental homes and apartments, shopping centers,
and office buildings. Business Banking also makes loans to various not-for-profit agencies located within the Bank’s market footprint. The targeted credit size for a relationship in this segment is between $500,000 and $5 million.
Construction and Land Development Lending — The Bank originates business loans for the construction of both single family residential properties and commercial properties (apartment complexes, shopping centers, office buildings). On a much smaller scale, the Bank may originate loans for the acquisition and development of residential or commercial land into buildable lots.
Internet Lending — The Bank accepts online loan applications for its RB&T brand through its website at www.republicbank.com. Historically, the majority of loans originated through the internet have been within the Bank’s traditional markets of Kentucky and Indiana. Other states where loans are marketed include California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee and Virginia, as well as, the District of Columbia.
Correspondent Lending — Primarily from its Warehouse clients, the Core Bank acquires for investment single family, first lien mortgage loans that meet the Core Bank’s specifications through its Correspondent Lending channel. Substantially all loans purchased through the Correspondent Lending channel are purchased at a premium.
Consumer Lending — Traditional consumer loans made by the Bank include home improvement and home equity loans, other secured and unsecured personal loans, and credit cards. With the exception of home equity loans, which are actively marketed in conjunction with single family, first lien residential real estate loans, other traditional consumer loan products, while available, are not and have not been actively promoted in the Bank’s markets.
The Bank has, from time to time, acquired unsecured consumer installment loans for investment from a third-party originator. Such consumer loans were purchased at par and were selected by the Bank based on certain underwriting characteristics.
Indirect Lending – In 2015, the Bank began to grow its presence in the consumer automobile loan market. The program involves establishing relationships with automobile dealers in the Bank’s market footprint and obtaining consumer automobile loans in a low-cost delivery method. As a result of its success in Indirect Auto Lending, the Bank entered Dealer Floor Plan Lending during the fourth quarter of 2016.
The Bank’s other Traditional Banking activities generally consists of the following:
MemoryBank — In October 2016, the Bank opened the “digital doors” of MemoryBank, a national branchless banking platform. MemoryBank is a separately branded division of the Bank, which from a marketing perspective, focuses on technologically savvy customers that prefer to carry larger balances in highly-liquid bank accounts. The Bank promotes the EarnMore account solely through its MemoryBank brand.
Private Banking — The Bank provides financial products and services to high net worth individuals through its Private Banking Department. The Bank’s Private Banking officers have extensive banking experience and are trained to meet the unique financial needs of this clientele.
Treasury Management Services — The Bank provides various deposit products designed for commercial business clients located throughout its market areas. Lockbox processing, business on-site deposit, business on-line banking, Internet bill pay, payroll processing, virtual vault, courier service, controlled disbursement accounts, corporate purchasing credit cards, account reconciliation and Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) processing are additional services offered to commercial businesses through the Bank’s Treasury Management Department.
Internet Banking — The Bank expands its market penetration and service delivery of its RB&T brand by offering clients Internet Banking services and products through its website, www.republicbank.com.
Mobile Banking — The Bank allows clients to easily and securely access and manage their accounts through its mobile banking application.
Other Banking Services — The Bank also provides title insurance and other financial institution related products and services.
Bank Acquisitions — The Bank maintains an acquisition strategy to selectively grow its franchise as a complement to its organic growth strategies.
See additional detail regarding the Traditional Banking segment under Footnote 16 “Segment Information” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
(II) Warehouse Lending segment
The Bank provides short-term, revolving credit facilities to mortgage bankers across the United States through mortgage warehouse lines of credit. These credit facilities are primarily secured by single family, first lien residential real estate loans. The credit facility enables the mortgage banking clients to close single family, first lien residential real estate loans in their own name and temporarily fund their inventory of these closed loans until the loans are sold to investors approved by the Bank or purchased by the Bank through its Correspondent Lending channel. Individual loans are expected to remain on the warehouse line for an average of 15 to 30 days. Reverse mortgage loans typically remain on the line longer than conventional mortgage loans. Interest income and loan fees are accrued for each individual loan during the time the loan remains on the warehouse line and collected when the loan is sold. The Bank receives the sale proceeds of each loan directly from the investor and applies the funds to pay off the warehouse advance and related accrued interest and fees. The remaining proceeds are credited to the mortgage-banking client.
See additional detail regarding the Warehouse Lending segment under Footnote 16 “Segment Information” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
(III) Mortgage Banking segment
Mortgage Banking activities primarily include 15-, 20- and 30-year fixed-term single family, first lien residential real estate loans that are sold into the secondary market, primarily to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC” or “Freddie Mac”) and the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA” or “Fannie Mae”). The Bank typically retains servicing on loans sold into the secondary market. Administration of loans with servicing retained by the Bank includes collecting principal and interest payments, escrowing funds for property taxes and property insurance, and remitting payments to secondary market investors. A fee is received by the Bank for performing these standard servicing functions.
See additional detail regarding Mortgage Banking under Footnote 11 “Mortgage Banking Activities” and Footnote 16 “Segment Information” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
(IV) Republic Processing Group segment
Tax Refund Solutions (“TRS”) division — Through its TRS division, the Bank is one of a limited number of financial institutions that facilitates the receipt and payment of federal and state tax refund products and offers a credit product through third-party tax preparers located throughout the United States, as well as tax-preparation software providers (collectively, the “Tax Providers”). Substantially all of the business generated by the TRS division occurs in the first half of the year. The TRS division traditionally operates at a loss during the second half of the year, during which time the division incurs costs preparing for the upcoming year’s first quarter tax season.
Refund Transfers (“RTs”) are fee-based products whereby a tax refund is issued to the taxpayer after the Bank has received the refund from the federal or state government. There is no credit risk or borrowing cost associated with these products because they are only delivered to the taxpayer upon receipt of the refund directly from the governmental paying authority.
“Easy Advance” Product
The Easy Advance (“EA”) tax credit product is a loan that allows a taxpayer to receive an advance of a portion of their refund, with the taxpayer’s Tax Provider paying all fees to RB&T for the advance.
TRS first offered its EA tax credit product during the first two months of 2016 and for a second successive year during the first two months of 2017. For the first quarter 2017 tax season, the Company modified the EA product offering to allow more than one advance amount and a different price structure to the Tax Providers based on the amount borrowed by the taxpayer. All other features of the product remained substantially the same as those from the first quarter 2016 tax season, including the following:
See additional detail regarding the Easy Advance (“EA”) product under Footnote 5 “Loans and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
Republic Credit Solutions (“RCS”) division — RCS is managed and operated within the RPG business segment. Through the RCS division, the Bank offers consumer credit products. In general, the credit products are unsecured, small dollar consumer loans with maturities of 30 days or more, and are dependent on various factors including the consumer’s ability to repay.
RCS originates, primarily for sale, both a line-of-credit product and a credit card product. The Bank sells 90% of the balances maintained through these two products within two days of loan origination and retains a 10% interest. The Company carries such loans at the lower of cost or fair value. The line-of-credit product represented the substantial majority of RCS activity during the first quarters of 2017 and 2016, as RCS expanded in June 2015 beyond its pilot phase. In December 2015, RCS began piloting its credit card product. Any gains or losses on the sale of RCS products are reported as a component of “Program fees.”
During the first quarter of 2016, RCS initiated an installment loan product, in which the Company sells 100% of these loans approximately 21 days after origination. The Company classifies these loans as held for sale and carries them at fair value, with this portfolio marked to market on a monthly basis with changes in its fair value reported as a component of Program fees.
During the first quarter of 2016, RCS initiated a healthcare receivables product. RCS works with healthcare providers to finance the healthcare services for their patients. RCS retains 100% of these loans.
The operating results of the RCS division were immaterial to the Company’s overall results of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 and were reported as part of the RPG segment. The RCS division will not be reported as a separate segment until such time, if any, that it meets reporting thresholds.
68
Republic Payment Solutions (“RPS”) division — RPS is managed and operated within the RPG business segment. The RPS division is an issuing bank offering general-purpose reloadable prepaid cards through third-party program managers. For the projected near-term, as the prepaid card program matures, the operating results of the RPS division are expected to be immaterial to the Company’s overall results of operations and will be reported as part of the RPG segment. The RPS division will not be reported as a separate segment until such time, if any, that it meets reporting thresholds.
OVERVIEW (Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2016)
Total Company net income for the first quarter of 2017 was $20.0 million, a $2.3 million, or 13%, increase from the same period in 2016. Diluted earnings per Class A Common Share increased to $0.96 for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 compared from $0.85 for the same period in 2016.
The Company’s Core Banking noninterest expenses, which include the noninterest expenses of the Traditional Banking segment, the Warehouse Lending segment, and the Mortgage Banking segment, were impacted by several initiatives during the first quarter of 2017 as compared to the first quarter of 2016. The long-term goal of these initiatives is to geographically expand and grow the Company’s loan and deposit client base, enhance client service through expanded hours and delivery channels, diversify the Company’s product mix, and to create greater operating efficiencies. Significant costs for some of the Company’s more notable strategic investments made over the previous 12 months include the following:
Expansion of the Company’s footprint into St. Petersburg, Florida through its May 2016 acquisition of Cornerstone Bancorp, Inc. (“Cornerstone”).
The October 2016 launch of MemoryBank, a separately-branded, nationwide digital banking platform, which has raised $28 million in deposits during the first three months of 2017.
The October 2016 introduction of Dealer Floor Plan Lending, which had $8 million of loans outstanding at March 31, 2017.
The opening of the Company’s new Vine Street location in downtown Lexington, Kentucky.
The opening of a new loan production office in Brentwood (Nashville), Tennessee.
Expanded contact center hours to 7 a.m. to midnight, seven days a week.
The pilot introduction of six interactive teller machines (“ITMs”) into four of the Company’s banking centers, with an expected expansion into additional banking centers upon the completion of a successful pilot phase.
In addition to the launched initiatives above, the Company also has plans for the following during the second half of 2017:
Implementation of a new client relationship management system.
Additional investment in mortgage-related personnel, processes and systems in order to expand market share.
Other general highlights by business segment for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 consisted of the following:
Traditional Banking segment
Net income decreased $387,000, or 6%, for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
Net interest income increased $4.1 million, or 14%, for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
The Traditional Banking Provisions for Loan and Lease Losses (“Provision”) was $467,000 for the first quarter of 2017 compared to $480,000 for the same period in 2016.
Total noninterest income increased $411,000, or 7%, for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
Total noninterest expense increased $5.2 million, or 21%, during the first quarter of 2017 compared to the first quarter of 2016.
Warehouse Lending segment
Net income increased $904,000, or 74%, for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
Net interest income increased $1.2 million, or 47%, for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
The Warehouse Provision was a credit of $226,000 for the first quarter of 2017 compared to a charge of $18,000 for the same period in 2016.
Mortgage Banking segment
Within the Mortgage Banking segment, mortgage banking income decreased $101,000, or 8%, during the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
Overall, Republic’s originations of secondary market loans totaled $33 million during the first quarter of 2017 compared to $37 million during the same period in 2016.
Republic Processing Group segment
Net income increased $1.8 million, or 19%, for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
Net interest income increased $11.7 million for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
Overall, RPG recorded a net charge to the Provision of $12.1 million during the first quarter of 2017, compared to a net charge of $4.7 million for the same period in 2016.
Noninterest income decreased $230,000 for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
Noninterest expenses were $6.9 million for the first quarter of 2017 compared to $5.7 million for the same period in 2016.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2016)
Net Interest Income
Banking operations are significantly dependent upon net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities and the interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities used to fund those assets, such as interest-bearing deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances. Net interest income is impacted by both changes in the amount and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as market interest rates.
Total Company net interest income increased $17.0 million, or 43%, during the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. Growth in RPG loans, in particular the EA product, and growth in average Core Bank loans were the primary contributors to the Company’s growth in net interest income. The total Company net interest margin increased to 4.99% during the first quarter of 2017 compared to 3.78% for the same period in 2016, with additional fee income from the EA product primarily driving the increase.
The most significant components affecting the total Company’s net interest income by business segment follow:
Net interest income within the Traditional Banking segment increased $4.1 million, or 14%, for the quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The Traditional Banking net interest margin was 3.30% for the first quarter of 2017, an increase of 22 basis points from the same period in 2016.
The increases in the Traditional Bank’s net interest income and net interest margin during the first quarter of 2017 were primarily attributable to the following factors:
Average Traditional Bank loans outstanding, excluding loans from the Company’s 2012 FDIC-assisted transactions, were $3.2 billion with a weighted average yield of 4.18% during the first quarter of 2017 compared to $2.9 billion with a weighted average yield of 4.02% during the first quarter of 2016. The overall effect of these changes in rate and volume was an increase of $3.8 million, or 13%, in interest income. This increase in average loans for the first quarter of 2017 over the first quarter of 2016 was driven primarily by growth in the Bank’s Commercial Real Estate (“CRE”), Commercial and Industrial (“C&I”), Home Equity Lines of Credit (“HELOC”) and Indirect Auto portfolios over the previous 12 months. Additionally, the acquisition of Cornerstone in May 2016 contributed approximately $200 million to the overall increase in average loan balances comparing the first quarter of 2017 to the first quarter of 2016.
Net interest income related to loans from the Company’s 2012 FDIC-assisted transactions was lower during the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to a lower rate of favorable payoffs and paydowns on the portfolio. When loans from these transactions are paid off, all unearned discount on such loans is immediately accreted into income. Accretion income during the first quarter of 2017 from this portfolio was $101,000 compared to $759,000 for the same period in 2016. Overall, the average balance of the portfolio was $14 million with a yield of 12.22% during the first quarter of 2017 compared to $24 million with a yield of 18.94% for 2016. The overall effect of these changes in rate and volume was a decrease of $683,000 in interest income.
The weighted average cost of FHLB advances during the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 declined to 1.53% from 2.14%, while the average outstanding FHLB advances increased $6 million when comparing the two periods. The net effect of these changes in rate and volume was an increase in net interest income of $661,000.
The FFTR, the index that many of the Bank’s short-term deposit rates track, increased for the second time in a three-month period during March 2017. Additionally, the FOMC of the FRB has provided further guidance that additional FFTR increases are possible during the remainder of 2017. While an increase in short-term interest rates is generally believed by management to be favorable to the Bank’s net interest income and net interest margin in the near-term, such increases in short-term interest rates could have a negative impact to net interest income and net interest margin if the Bank is unable to maintain its overall funding costs at those levels assumed in its interest rate risk model or the yield curve flattens causing the spread between long-term interest rates and short-term interest rates to decrease. Unknown variables, which may impact the Bank’s net interest income and net interest margin in the future, include, but are not limited to, the actual steepness of the yield curve, future demand for the Bank’s financial products and the Bank’s overall future liquidity needs.
Net interest income within the Warehouse Lending segment increased $1.2 million, or 47%, for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The increase in net interest income was partially attributable to higher average outstanding balances and partially to higher weighted average loan yield for the current period as compared to the same period in 2016. Total Warehouse line commitments increased to $983 million at March 31, 2017 from $615 million at March 31, 2016, with the Company continuing to grow its Warehouse client base over the previous 12 months. Average line usage on Warehouse commitments was 44% during the first quarter of 2017 compared to 47% during the first quarter of 2016, as usage rates during both quarters benefitted from continued low, long-term mortgage rates during the periods. For the remainder of 2017, management expects usage rates for Warehouse lines to be lower than comparable periods in 2016 due primarily to currently projected mortgage interest rates. The yield for Warehouse lines of credit during the first quarter of 2017 increased 19 basis points from the same period in 2016, as the Warehouse yield was positively impacted by an increase in short-term interest rates.
Overall, average outstanding Warehouse lines of credit during the first quarter of 2017 increased $144 million, or 49%, compared to the same period in 2016. Average outstanding warehouse balances were $436 million during the first quarter of 2017 with a weighted
average yield of 4.20%, compared to average outstanding balances of $293 million with a weighted average yield of 4.01% for the same period in 2016. The overall yield on warehouse lines generally improved from the first quarter of 2016 to the first quarter of 2017, because the rates paid to the Bank by its Warehouse clients are generally tied to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR), which is a short-term market-rate index that generally tracks with the FFTR.
Net interest income within the RPG segment increased $11.7 million for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The increase in RPG’s net interest income was primarily attributed to the following factors:
The TRS division’s EA product earned $14.2 million in interest income during the first quarter of 2017, a $9.0 million, or 173%, increase from the same period in 2016. The higher EA income was driven by an increase in EA origination volume as the Company originated $329 million in EAs during the first quarter of 2017 compared to $123 million during the first quarter of 2016. Additional demand for EAs during 2017 was partially driven by the previously announced delays in certain taxpayer refunds from the U.S. Treasury due to additional fraud prevention measures taken by the Federal government. In addition, the Company’s increase in EA dollar volume during 2017 was driven by a higher weighted average advance amount as compared to 2016.
See additional detail regarding the EA product under Footnote 5 “Loans and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements.”
Partially offsetting growth in EA-related interest income, the TRS division did not renew a short-term commercial loan from which it earned $1.1 million in loan fees during the first quarter of 2016. However, TRS did earn $635,000 in loan fees during the first quarter of 2017 from other commercial loan relationships.
Consumer credit products through the RCS division of RPG earned $4.8 million in net interest income during the first quarter of 2017 compared to $1.7 million for the same period in 2016. The increase was driven by the previously discussed product expansion at RCS over the previous 12 months, particularly within the division’s line-of-credit product.
Table 2 — Total Company Average Balance Sheets and Interest Rates for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016
Interest-earning assets:
Taxable investment securities, including FHLB stock(1)
586,621
2,485
1.69
581,869
2,157
1.48
Federal funds sold and other interest-earning deposits
184,007
298,250
429
0.58
RPG Easy Advance loans and fees(2)
76,502
14,216
74.33
20,044
5,209
103.95
Other RPG loans and fees(3)(6)
43,946
5,529
50.33
29,526
2,757
37.35
Outstanding Warehouse lines of credit and fees(4)(6)
436,459
4,586
4.20
292,574
2,932
4.01
All other Traditional Bank loans and fees(5)(6)
3,192,831
33,673
4.22
2,950,545
30,531
4.14
Total interest-earning assets
4,520,366
5.39
4,172,808
(38,345)
(29,260)
Noninterest-earning assets:
Noninterest-earning cash and cash equivalents
198,791
159,357
43,835
30,811
61,986
53,032
Other assets(1)
61,067
50,095
4,847,700
4,436,843
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Transaction accounts
1,045,420
381
0.15
878,863
0.08
555,023
0.22
524,379
229
0.17
227,318
572
1.01
209,078
553
1.06
Brokered money market and brokered certificates of deposit
384,458
614
291,401
430
0.59
2,212,219
0.34
1,903,721
0.29
598,167
552,082
2.42
2.05
Total interest-bearing liabilities
3,070,038
2,904,741
0.63
Noninterest-bearing liabilities and Stockholders’ equity:
1,132,591
916,691
34,642
27,818
Stockholders’ equity
610,429
587,593
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Net interest spread
4.81
3.59
For the purpose of this calculation, the fair market value adjustment on investment securities resulting from ASC Topic 320, Investments — Debt and Equity Securities, is included as a component of other assets.
Interest income for Easy Advances is composed entirely of loan fees.
Interest income includes loan fees of $5.1 million and $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Interest income includes loan fees of $769,000 and $491,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Interest income includes loan fees of $1.1 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
(6)
Average balances for loans include the principal balance of nonaccrual loans and loans held for sale, and are inclusive of all loan premiums, discounts, fees and costs.
Table 3 illustrates the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities impacted Republic’s interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect to (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), (ii) changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume) and (iii) net change. The changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.
Table 3 — Total Company Volume/Rate Variance Analysis for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016
Compared to
Total Net
Increase / (Decrease) Due to
Volume
Interest income:
Taxable investment securities, including FHLB stock
310
(200)
165
RPG Easy Advance loans and fees
9,007
10,875
(1,868)
Other RPG loans and fees
2,772
1,620
Outstanding Warehouse lines of credit and fees
1,506
All other Traditional Bank loans and fees
3,142
2,546
596
Net change in interest income
16,868
16,365
Interest expense:
201
162
146
(661)
(892)
Net change in interest expense
(136)
462
(598)
Net change in net interest income
17,004
15,903
1,101
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
The Company recorded a Provision of $12.4 million for the first quarter of 2017, compared to $5.2 million for the same period in 2016. The significant components comprising the Company’s Provision by business segment were as follows:
The Traditional Banking Provision during the first quarter of 2017 was $467,000, compared to $480,000 for the first quarter of 2016. An analysis of the Provision for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 follows:
Related to the Bank’s pass-rated and non-rated credits, the Bank recorded net charges of $491,000 and $527,000 to the Provision for the first quarters of 2017 and 2016. Loan growth primarily drove the net charges to the Provision in both periods.
Related to the Bank’s loans rated Substandard and Special Mention, the Bank recorded a net credit to the Provision of $8,000 for the first quarter of 2017 compared to a net charge of $67,000 to the Provision during the first quarter 2016.
Related to purchased-credit-impaired (“PCI”) loans, the Bank recorded net credits of $16,000 and $114,000 to the Provision during the first quarters of 2017 and 2016. For PCI loans, charges generally reflect projected shortfalls in cash flows below initial acquisition-day estimates, while credits are primarily attributable to generally positive dispositions.
As a percentage of total loans, the Traditional Banking Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (“Allowance”) was 0.84% at March 31, 2017 compared to 0.83% at December 31, 2016 and 0.85% at March 31, 2016. The Company believes, based on information presently available, that it has adequately provided for its loan portfolio within its Allowance at March 31, 2017.
See the sections titled “Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” and “Asset Quality” in this section of the filing under “Comparison of Financial Condition” for additional discussion regarding the Provision and the Bank’s credit quality.
The Warehouse Provision was a credit of $226,000 for the first quarter of 2017, a $244,000 decrease from the same period in 2016. Provision expense for both periods reflected changes in general reserves consistent with changes in outstanding period-end balances. Outstanding Warehouse period-end balances decreased $90 million during the first quarter of 2017 compared to an increase of $7 million during the first quarter of 2016.
As a percentage of total Warehouse outstanding balances, the Warehouse Allowance was 0.25% at March 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and March 31, 2016. The Company believes, based on information presently available, that it has adequately provided for Warehouse loan losses at March 31, 2017.
RPG recorded a net charge to the Provision of $12.1 million during the first quarter of 2017, an increase of $7.4 million compared to same period in 2016. The increase in Provision at RPG was primarily attributable to an increase in estimated losses for EA loans within the TRS division, as EA volume increased 167% for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the first quarter of 2016. As a result of the increased EA volume, the TRS division recorded a Provision of $8.6 million during the first quarter of 2017 compared to $3.6 million for the same period in 2016. As of March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had Provisions of 2.62% and 2.90% of total EAs originated. The Company finished 2016 with an actual net loss rate of 2.47% of total EAs originated during 2016.
In addition to the higher Provision associated with EA loans at TRS, the Bank also recorded charges of $3.8 million and $1.4 million to the Provision during the first quarters of 2017 and 2016 associated with the RCS division’s consumer loans. Provision expense was higher at RCS due to an increase in general loss reserves for growth in RCS loans, as well as an increase in the historical loss factors for the general reserves for RCS loans resulting from a rise in charge-offs from the prior year.
75
While RPG loans generally return higher yields, they also present a greater credit risk than Traditional Banking loan products. As a percentage of total RPG loans, the RPG Allowance was 33.65% at March 31, 2017 compared to 12.82% at December 31, 2016 and 40.78% at March 31, 2016. The Company believes, based on information presently available, that it has adequately provided for RPG loan losses at March 31, 2017.
Table 4 — Summary of Loan and Lease Loss Experience for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016
Allowance at beginning of period
Charge-offs:
(14)
(188)
(441)
(304)
Total charge-offs
Recoveries:
177
Total recoveries
Net loan charge-offs
(2,909)
(1,202)
Provision - Core Bank
Provision - RPG
Total Provision
Allowance at end of period
Allowance to total loans
1.14
0.94
Allowance to nonperforming loans
Net loan charge-offs to average loans
0.31
0.76
131
0.04
Noninterest Income
Total Company noninterest income increased $2,000 during the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The most significant components comprising the total Company’s noninterest income by business segment were as follows:
Traditional Banking segment noninterest income increased $411,000, or 7%, for the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The most significant categories affecting the change in noninterest income for the quarter were as follows:
Service charges on deposit accounts increased $144,000, or 5%, to $3.3 million for the first quarter of 2017 compared the same period in 2016. The Bank earns a substantial majority of its fee income related to its overdraft service program from the per item fee it assesses its customers for each insufficient funds check or electronic debit presented for payment. The total per item fees, net of refunds, included in service charges on deposits for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were $1.9 million and $1.8 million. The total daily overdraft charges, net of refunds, included in interest income for the quarters ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were $411,000 and $380,000.
Interchange fees increased $163,000, or 8%, primarily due to an increase in debit card interchange revenue. The higher revenue for debit card transactions was consistent with and driven by growth in the Company’s retail checking accounts from period to period.
Within the Mortgage Banking segment, mortgage banking income decreased $101,000, or 8%, during the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, as a result of a slowdown in consumer refinance volume. Overall, Republic’s origination of secondary market loans totaled $33 million during the first quarter of 2017 compared to $37 million during the same period in 2016. The ratio of net gain on sale of mortgage loans originated for sale was 2.94% and 2.96% during the first quarters of 2017 and 2016.
Within the RPG segment, noninterest income decreased $230,000, or 1%, during the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The overall decrease was primarily attributable to a 10% decrease in net RT revenue at TRS from the first quarter of 2016 to first quarter of 2017, consistent with the 9% decrease in RT volume for the same periods. The decline in RT volume was directionally consistent with a reported decline in e-filings at the Internal Revenue Service over the same periods.
Partially offsetting the decrease in net RT revenue was an increase of $772,000 in RCS program fees, which represents gains from the sale of consumer loans originated and sold through the RCS division of RPG. The increase in RPG program fees resulted from the previously reported increase in volume from RCS’ small-dollar consumer loan programs. During the first quarter of 2017, the Company sold approximately $126 million of loans from these programs compared to $44 million during the first quarter of 2016. In addition, RCS benefitted during the first quarter of 2017 from the final revenue payment of $427,000 from a program sponsor related to a first-year volume guarantee for its credit product.
Noninterest Expenses
Total Company noninterest expenses increased $6.4 million, or 20%, during the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The most significant components comprising the increase in noninterest expense by business segment were as follows:
See section titled “OVERVIEW (Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2016)” for a brief description of some of the Company’s strategic initiatives impacting the noninterest categories below.
For the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, Traditional Banking noninterest expenses increased $5.2 million, or 21%. The most significant categories affecting the change in noninterest expense for the quarter were as follows:
Salaries and benefits expense increased $3.3 million, primarily due to an increase of 145 full-time-equivalent (“FTE”) employees from March 31, 2016 to March 31, 2017. The increase in FTEs was driven by additional staffing needed to implement the Company’s strategic initiatives, with an increase of 36 FTEs resulting from the Company’s 2016 Cornerstone acquisition.
Occupancy expense increased $552,000, or 11%, primarily driven by an 11% increase in rent expense and a 23% increase in depreciation expense resulting from new locations, existing banking center renovations and the cost of technology to support the Core Bank’s strategic initiatives. In addition, $151,000 of the $552,000 increase in Occupancy expense was driven by the Company’s 2016 Cornerstone acquisition.
Marketing expenses increased $422,000, or 87%, with $304,000 of the increase related to promotion of the Core Bank’s MemoryBank digital banking platform.
Within the RPG segment, noninterest expenses increased $1.1 million, or 20%, during the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The increase is primarily due to a $627,000 increase in salaries and benefits expense, driven by additional staff added during the previous 12 months to support growth in the TRS and RCS divisions.
78
COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT March 31, 2017 AND December 31, 2016
Loan Portfolio
Table 8 — Loan Portfolio Composition
* Identifies loans to borrowers located primarily outside of the Bank’s market footprint.
** Total loans are presented inclusive of premiums, discounts and net loan origination fees and costs.
Gross loans decreased by $100 million, or 3%, during 2017 to $3.7 billion at March 31, 2017 primarily driven by seasonal declines in outstanding warehouse lines of credit and owner occupied residential real estate loans.
Warehouse Lines of Credit
As of March 31, 2017, the Bank had $495 million outstanding on total committed Warehouse credit lines of $983 million. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank had $585 million outstanding on total committed Warehouse credit lines of $1.0 billion. The $90 million decrease in outstanding balances reflects a general seasonal decline in the use of the Company’s Warehouse lines.
Due to the volatility and seasonality of the mortgage market, it is difficult to project future outstanding balances of Warehouse lines of credit. The growth of the Bank’s Warehouse Lending business greatly depends on the overall mortgage market and typically follows industry trends. Since its entrance into this business segment during 2011, the Bank has experienced volatility in the Warehouse portfolio consistent with overall demand for mortgage products. Weighted average quarterly usage rates on the Bank’s Warehouse lines have ranged from a low of 31% during the fourth quarter of 2013 to a high of 64% during the second quarter of 2015. On an annual basis, weighted average usage rates on the Bank’s Warehouse lines have ranged from a low of 40% during 2013 to a high of 57% during 2016.
Other Core Bank Loans
In addition to the decrease in outstanding warehouse lines of credit, other Core Bank loans also experienced an overall decline of $14 million during the first quarter of 2017, consistent with loan growth data released by the Federal Reserve for all commercial banks. Within the Core Bank’s portfolio, owner occupied residential real estate loans experienced the largest decrease of $30 million, while CRE loans decreased $11 million. Partially offsetting these decreases, Commercial and Industrial loans grew $12 million, with $6 million of that growth driven by the Bank’s Dealer Floor Plan Lending product.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (“Allowance”)
The Bank maintains an Allowance for probable incurred credit losses inherent in the Bank’s loan portfolio, which includes overdrawn deposit accounts. Management evaluates the adequacy of the Allowance on a monthly basis and presents and discusses the analysis with the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.
The Allowance consists of both specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired. The general component relates to pooled loans collectively evaluated on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors.
Specific Component – Loans Individually Classified as Impaired
The Bank defines impaired loans as follows:
All loans internally rated as “Substandard,” “Doubtful” or “Loss”;
All loans on nonaccrual status;
All Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”);
All loans internally rated in a purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) category with cash flows that have deteriorated from management’s initial acquisition day estimate; and
Any other situation where the full collection of the total amount due for a loan is improbable or otherwise meets the definition of impaired.
Generally, loans are designated as “Classified” or “Special Mention” to ensure more frequent monitoring. These loans are reviewed to ensure proper accrual status and management strategy. If it is determined that there is serious doubt as to performance in accordance with original or modified contractual terms, then the loan is generally downgraded and may be charged down to its estimated value and placed on nonaccrual status.
Under GAAP, the Bank uses the following methods to measure specific loan impairment, including:
Cash Flow Method — The recorded investment in the loan is measured against the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. The Bank employs this method for a significant portion of its TDRs. Impairment amounts under this method are reflected in the Bank’s Allowance as specific reserves on the respective impaired loan. These specific reserves are adjusted quarterly based upon reevaluation of the expected future cash flows and changes in the recorded investment.
Collateral Method — The recorded investment in the loan is measured against the fair value of the collateral less applicable selling costs. The Bank employs the fair value of collateral method for its impaired loans when repayment is based solely on the sale or operations of the underlying collateral. Collateral fair value is typically based on the most recent real estate valuation on file. Measured impairment under this method is generally charged off unless the loan is a smaller-balance, homogeneous loan. The Bank’s selling costs for its collateral-dependent loans typically range from 10-13% of the fair value of the underlying collateral, depending on the asset class. Selling costs are not applicable for collateral-dependent loans whose repayment is based solely on the operations of the underlying collateral.
In addition to obtaining appraisals at the time of origination, the Bank typically updates appraisals and/or broker price opinions (“BPOs”) for loans with potential impairment. Updated valuations for commercial-related credits exhibiting an increased risk of loss are typically obtained within one year of the previous valuation. Collateral values for delinquent residential mortgage loans and home equity loans are generally updated prior to a loan becoming 90 days delinquent, but no more than 180 days past due. When measuring impairment, to the extent updated collateral values cannot be obtained due to the lack of recent comparable sales or for other reasons, the Bank discounts such stale valuations primarily based on age of valuation and market conditions of the underlying collateral.
General Component – Pooled Loans Collectively Evaluated
The general component of the Allowance covers loans collectively evaluated for impairment by loan class and is based on historical loss experience, with potential adjustments for current relevant qualitative factors. Historical loss experience is determined by loan performance and class and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Bank. Large groups of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans are typically included in the general component but may be individually evaluated if classified as a TDRs, on nonaccrual, or a case where the full collection of the total amount due for a such loan is improbable or otherwise meets the definition of impaired.
As this analysis, or any similar analysis, is an imprecise measure of loss, the Allowance is subject to ongoing adjustments. Therefore, management will often take into account other significant factors that may be necessary or prudent in order to reflect probable incurred losses in the total loan portfolio.
The Company’s Allowance increased $9 million, or 29%, from December 31, 2016 to $42 million at March 31, 2017, primarily driven by reserves for EAs, growth in RCS small-dollar credit products and general growth in a few Core Bank portfolios.
As a percent of total loans, the total Company’s Allowance increased to 1.14% at March 31, 2017 compared to 0.86% at December 31, 2016. The increase in ratio of Allowance to total loans was primarily driven by reserves for the EA product and growth in RCS small-dollar consumer products. An analysis of the Allowance by business segment follows:
The Allowance at the Traditional Banking segment, remained at $27 million at March 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016. The Allowance to total Traditional Bank loans increased to 0.84% at March 31, 2017 from 0.83% at December 31, 2016.
The Allowance on loans originated through the Company’s Warehouse segment remained at approximately $1 million from March 31, 2017 to December 31, 2016.
The Allowance on loans originated through the Company’s RPG segment increased to $14 million at March 31, 2017 from $5 million at December 31, 2016, driven primarily by $8 million of estimated reserves for loss on TRS’s EA product. The Allowance to total RPG loans increased to 33.65% at March 31, 2017 from 12.82% at December 31, 2016 and 40.78% at March 31, 2016.
Due to the seasonal nature of the EA, estimated reserves are generally made during the first two months of the year when the product is offered, with losses charged against those reserves generally in the second quarter of each year. Based on the timing of EA reserves versus charge-offs, the Allowance for EAs to total remaining outstanding EAs is relatively substantial at the end of the first quarter, or 72.44% and 72.90% at March 31, 2017 and 2016; however, these ratios are consistent with the Company’s estimated losses of 2.62% and 2.90% of total EAs originated during the first two months of 2017 and 2016.
Along with the EA offered through the TRS division, RPG maintained an Allowance for three loan products offered through its RCS division at March 31, 2017, including its line-of-credit product, its credit card product and its healthcare-receivables product. At March 31, 2017, the Allowance to total loans estimated for each RCS product ranged from as low as 0.25% for its healthcare-receivables portfolio to as high as 30.77% for its line-of-credit portfolio. A lower reserve percentage was provided for RCS’s healthcare receivables at March 31, 2017, as such receivables are generally repurchased by the Bank’s healthcare partner if they become 90-days-or-more delinquent.
Asset Quality
Classified and Special Mention Loans
The Bank applies credit quality indicators, or “ratings,” to individual loans based on internal Bank policies. Such internal policies are informed by regulatory standards. Loans rated “Loss,” “Doubtful,” “Substandard” and PCI-Substandard (“PCI-Sub”) are considered “Classified.” Loans rated “Special Mention” or PCI Group 1 (“PCI-1”) are considered Special Mention. The Bank’s Classified and Special Mention loans decreased $2 million during the first three months of 2017, primarily due to the payoffs and paydowns of Special Mention loans during the period.
See Footnote 5 “Loans and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements” for additional discussion regarding Classified and Special mention loans.
Table 9 — Classified and Special Mention Loans
Doubtful
Purchased Credit Impaired - Substandard
Total Classified Loans
23,356
23,778
Special Mention
Purchased Credit Impaired - Group 1
Total Special Mention Loans
36,401
38,610
Total Classified and Special Mention Loans
59,757
62,388
Nonperforming Loans
Nonperforming loans include loans on nonaccrual status and loans past due 90-days-or-more and still accruing. Impaired loans that are not placed on nonaccrual status are not included as nonperforming loans. The nonperforming loan category includes TDRs totaling approximately $9 million and $10 million at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Generally, all nonperforming loans are considered impaired.
Nonperforming loans to total loans increased to 0.46% at March 31, 2017 from 0.42% at December 31, 2016, as the total balance of nonperforming loans increased by $937,000, or 6%, while total loans decreased $100 million, or 3% during the first quarter of 2017.
Table 10 — Nonperforming Loans and Nonperforming Assets Summary
*Loans on nonaccrual status include impaired loans. See Footnote 5 “Loans and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements” for additional discussion regarding impaired loans.
** Loans past due 90-days-or-more and still accruing consist of PCI loans or smaller balance consumer loans.
Approximately $14 million, or 81%, of the Bank’s total nonperforming loans at March 31, 2017 were concentrated in the residential real estate category, with the underlying collateral predominantly located in the Bank’s primary market area of Kentucky. The Bank’s nonperforming residential real estate concentration was $13 million, or 80%, as of December 31, 2016.
Approximately $3 million, or 16%, of the Bank’s total nonperforming loans were concentrated in the CRE and construction and land development portfolios as of March 31, 2017, compared to $3 million, or 17%, at December 31, 2016. While CRE is the primarily collateral for such loans, the Bank also obtains in many cases, at the time of origination, personal guarantees from the principal borrowers and secured liens on the guarantors’ primary residences.
Table 11 — Nonperforming Loan Composition
Percent of
Loan Class
1.21
1.10
0.54
0.25
0.37
134
0.70
0.73
16,874
15,977
0.38
0.21
84
Table 12 — Stratification of Nonperforming Loans
Number of Nonperforming Loans and Recorded Investment
> $100 &
No.
<= $100
<= $500
> $500
5,577
4,446
1,708
756
1,165
1,408
589
679
6,561
6,441
3,872
1,667
6,683
1,892
5,417
5,538
775
1,190
192
6,411
7,362
2,204
233
1,163
1,355
6,493
1,396
Approximately $1 million in nonperforming loans at December 31, 2016, were removed from the nonperforming loan classification during the first three months of 2017. Approximately $330,000 in loan balances were transferred to OREO, with $1 million refinanced at other financial institutions.
Based on the Bank’s review at March 31, 2017, management believes that its reserves are adequate to absorb probable losses on all nonperforming loans.
Table 13 — Rollforward of Nonperforming Loan Activity
Nonperforming loans at beginning of period
21,936
Loans added to nonperforming status
2,659
1,869
Loans removed from nonperforming status (see table below)
(1,411)
(3,542)
(311)
(356)
Nonperforming loans at end of period
19,907
Table 14 — Detail of Loans Removed from Nonperforming Status
Loans charged-off
(47)
Loans transferred to OREO
(330)
(472)
Loans refinanced at other institutions
(1,081)
(3,023)
Loans returned to accrual status
Total nonperforming loans removed from nonperforming status
Delinquent loans to total loans increased to 0.44% at March 31, 2017, from 0.24% at December 31, 2016, due to delinquent EAs as of March 31, 2017. Generally, all remaining unpaid EAs will be charged off in the second quarter of 2017. Core Bank delinquent loans to total Core Bank loans decreased to 0.16% at March 31, 2017 from 0.18% at December 31, 2016. With the exception of PCI loans and small-dollar consumer loans, all Traditional Bank loans past due 90-days-or-more as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were on nonaccrual status.
Table 15 — Delinquent Loan Composition(*)
0.03
0.13
0.27
0.28
0.20
18.45
20.05
1.45
0.16
0.18
78.24
5.81
6.63
23.91
5.49
Total delinquent loans
*Represents total loans 30-days-or-more past due. Delinquent status may be determined by either the number of days past due or number of payments past due. Easy Advances do not have a contractual due date but are eligible for delinquency consideration three weeks after the taxpayer customer’s tax return is submitted to the applicable tax authority.
Approximately $3 million in delinquent loans at December 31, 2016, were removed from delinquent status as of March 31, 2017. Approximately $300,000 in loan balances were transferred to OREO, with $1 million refinanced at other financial institutions and the remaining $2 million in delinquent loans were paid current in 2017.
Table 16 — Rollforward of Delinquent Loan Activity
Delinquent loans at beginning of period
Loans that became delinquent during the period - Easy Advances*
3,880
Loans that became delinquent during the period - other
2,650
3,195
Delinquent loans removed from delinquent status (see table below)
(3,486)
(6,237)
Change in principal balance of loans delinquent in both periods**
(309)
Delinquent loans at end of period
12,537
*Easy Advances do not have a contractual due date but are eligible for delinquency consideration three weeks after the taxpayer customer’s tax return is submitted to the applicable tax authority.
**Includes relatively-small consumer portfolios, e.g., credit cards.
Table 17 — Detail of Delinquent Loans Removed From Delinquent Status
(300)
(1,344)
(2,690)
Loans paid current
(1,842)
(3,028)
Total delinquent loans removed from delinquent status
Impaired Loans and Troubled Debt Restructurings
The Bank’s policy is to charge-off all or that portion of its recorded investment in a collateral-dependent impaired credit upon a determination that it is probable the full amount of contractual principal and interest will not be collected. Impaired loans totaled $49 million at March 31, 2017 compared to $53 million at December 31, 2016, a decrease of $4 million during the first three months of 2017.
A TDR is the situation where, due to a borrower’s financial difficulties, the Bank grants a concession to the borrower that the Bank would not otherwise have considered. The majority of the Bank’s TDRs involve a restructuring of loan terms such as a temporary reduction in the payment amount to require only interest and escrow (if required), reducing the loan’s interest rate and/or extending the maturity date of the debt. Nonaccrual loans modified as TDRs remain on nonaccrual status and continue to be reported as nonperforming loans. Accruing loans modified as TDRs are evaluated for nonaccrual status based on a current evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition, and ability and willingness to service the modified debt. As of March 31, 2017, the Bank had $39 million in TDRs, of which $9 million were also on nonaccrual status. As of December 31, 2016, the Bank had $42 million in TDRs, of which $10 million were also on nonaccrual status.
Table 18 — Impaired Loan Composition
Troubled debt restructurings
Impaired loans (which are not TDRs)
10,208
11,098
See Footnote 5 “Loans and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements” for additional discussion regarding impaired loans and TDRs.
Table 19 — Stratification of Other Real Estate Owned
Number of OREO Properties and Carrying Value Range
< = $100
< = $500
544
848
Table 20 — Rollforward of Other Real Estate Owned Activity
OREO at beginning of period
1,220
Transfer from loans to OREO
Proceeds from sale*
(501)
(844)
Net gain on sale
Writedowns
(70)
OREO at end of period
1,280
* Inclusive of non-cash proceeds where the Bank financed the sale of the property.
The fair value of OREO represents the estimated value that management expects to receive when the property is sold, net of related costs to sell. These estimates are based on the most recently available real estate appraisals, with certain adjustments made based on the type of property, age of appraisal, current status of the property and other relevant factors to estimate the current value of the property.
Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”)
BOLI offers tax advantaged noninterest income to help the Bank offset employee benefits expenses. The Company carried $62 million of BOLI on its consolidated balance sheet at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Table 21 — Deposit Composition
* Represents a time deposit.
Total Company deposits increased $188 million, or 6%, from December 31, 2016 to $3.3 billion at March 31, 2017. Total Company interest-bearing deposits increased $90 million, or 4%, while total Company noninterest bearing deposits increased $98 million, or 10%.
Noninterest bearing deposits at RPG increased $107 million from December 31, 2016 to $135 million at March 31, 2017. The increase was driven by short-term RT deposits at TRS, the majority of which will flow out of the Company during April 2017.
Related to the increase in interest-bearing deposits, money market deposits originated through MemoryBank’s EarnMore product increased to $28 million during the first quarter of 2017. In addition, growth in balances for several large corporate clients drove the additional increase in Core Bank interest-bearing deposits for the first three months of 2017.
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other Short-term Borrowings
Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase (“SSUARs”) are collateralized by securities and are treated as financings; accordingly, the securities involved with the agreements are recorded as assets and are held by a safekeeping agent and the obligations to repurchase the securities are reflected as liabilities. All securities underlying the agreements are under the Bank’s control.
SSUARs decreased approximately $29 million, or 17%, during the first three months of 2017. The substantial majority of SSUARs are indexed to immediately repricing indices such as the Fed Funds Target Rate.
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
FHLB advances decreased $335 million, or 42%, from December 31, 2016 to $468 million at March 31, 2017. The Bank held $75 million in overnight advances at a rate of 0.90% as of March 31, 2017, compared to $285 million in overnight advances at a rate of 0.64% at December 31, 2016.
During the first quarter of 2017, the Bank obtained $25 million in additional fixed-rate term advances with a weighted average rate of 1.88% and a weighted average term of 3.0 years, while $150 million of fixed-rate term advances with a weighted average rate of 1.96% matured during the period.
The Company’s usage of FHLB advances declined during the quarter due to excess short-term cash the Company had available from its TRS division’s RT product. Management anticipates its usage of FHLB advances to increase during the next quarter as this short-term cash exits the Company.
Overall use of FHLB advances during a given year is dependent upon many factors including asset growth, deposit growth, current earnings, and expectations of future interest rates, among others. If a meaningful amount of the Bank’s loan originations in the future have repricing terms longer than five years, management will likely elect to borrow additional funds to mitigate its risk of future increases in market interest rates. Whether the Bank ultimately does so, and how much in advances it extends out, will be dependent upon circumstances at that time. If the Bank does obtain longer-term FHLB advances for interest rate risk mitigation, it will have a negative impact on then current earnings. The amount of the negative impact will be dependent upon the dollar amount, coupon and final maturity of the advances obtained.
Interest Rate Swaps
The Bank entered into two interest rate swap agreements during 2013 as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. The Bank designated the swaps as cash flow hedges intended to reduce the variability in cash flows attributable to either FHLB advances tied to the 3-month LIBOR or the overall changes in cash flows on certain money market deposit accounts tied to 1-month LIBOR. The counterparty for both swaps met the Bank’s credit standards and the Bank believes that the credit risk inherent in the swap contracts is not significant.
The Bank also enters into interest rate swaps to facilitate client transactions and meet their financing needs. Upon entering into these instruments, the Bank enters into offsetting positions in order to minimize the Bank’s interest rate risk. These swaps are derivatives, but are not designated as hedging instruments, and therefore changes in fair value are reported in current year earnings.
See Footnote 12 “Interest Rate Swaps” of Part I Item 1 “Financial Statements” for additional discussion regarding the Bank’s interest rate swaps.
Liquidity
The Bank had a loan to deposit ratio (excluding brokered deposits) of 125% at March 31, 2017 and 138% at December 31, 2016. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had cash and cash equivalents on-hand of $206 million and $289 million. In addition, the Bank had available borrowing capacity of $683 million and $378 million from the FHLB at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. In addition to its borrowing capacity with the FHLB, the Bank’s liquidity resources included unencumbered securities of $342 million and $291 million as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and unsecured lines of credit totaling $125 million and $150 million available through various other financial institutions as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
The Bank maintains sufficient liquidity to fund routine loan demand and routine deposit withdrawal activity. Liquidity is managed by maintaining sufficient liquid assets in the form of investment securities. Funding and cash flows can also be realized by the sale of securities available for sale, principal paydowns on loans and MBSs and proceeds realized from loans held for sale. The Bank’s liquidity is impacted by its ability to sell certain investment securities, which is limited due to the level of investment securities that are needed to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, FHLB borrowings, and for other purposes, as required by law. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, these pledged investment securities had a fair value of $225 million and $232 million. Republic’s banking centers and its websites, www.republicbank.com and www.mymemorybank.com, provide access to retail deposit markets. These retail deposit products, if offered at attractive rates, have historically been a source of additional funding when needed. If the Bank were to lose a significant funding source, such as a few major depositors, or if any of its lines of credit were canceled, or if the Bank cannot obtain brokered deposits, the Bank would be compelled to offer market leading deposit interest rates to meet its funding and liquidity needs.
93
At March 31, 2017, the Bank had approximately $615 million in deposits from 95 large non-sweep deposit relationships where the individual relationship individually exceeded $2 million. The 20 largest non-sweep deposit relationships represented approximately $369 million, or 11%, of the Company’s total deposit balances at March 31, 2017. These accounts do not require collateral; therefore, cash from these accounts can generally be utilized to fund the loan portfolio. If any of these balances were moved from the Bank, the Bank would likely utilize overnight borrowing lines in the short-term to replace the balances. On a longer-term basis, the Bank would likely utilize brokered deposits to replace withdrawn balances. Based on past experience utilizing brokered deposits, the Bank believes it can quickly obtain brokered deposits if needed. The overall cost of gathering brokered deposits, however, could be substantially higher than the Traditional Bank deposits they replace, potentially decreasing the Bank’s earnings.
Due to the its historical success of growing loans and its overall use of non-core funding sources, the Bank has approached, and in some cases fallen short of, its minimum internal policy limits for liquidity management, as set forth by the Bank’s Board of Directors. As of March 31, 2017, the Bank was in compliance with all Board-approved liquidity policies.
Total stockholders’ equity increased from $604 million at December 31, 2016 to $621 million at March 31, 2017. The increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily attributable to net income earned during 2017 reduced by cash dividends declared.
See Part II, Item 2. “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds” for additional detail regarding stock repurchases and stock buyback programs.
Common Stock — The Class A Common Shares are entitled to cash dividends equal to 110% of the cash dividend paid per share on Class B Common Stock. Class A Common Shares have one vote per share and Class B Common shares have ten votes per share. Class B Common Shares may be converted, at the option of the holder, to Class A Common shares on a share for share basis. The Class A Common Shares are not convertible into any other class of Republic’s capital stock.
Dividend Restrictions — The Parent Company’s principal source of funds for dividend payments are dividends received from RB&T. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid to the Parent Company by the Bank without prior approval of the respective states’ banking regulators. Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to the current year’s net profits, combined with the retained net profits of the preceding two years. At March 31, 2017, RB&T could, without prior approval, declare dividends of approximately $63 million.
Regulatory Capital Requirements — The Company and the Bank are subject to capital regulations in accordance with Basel III, as administered by banking regulators. Regulatory agencies measure capital adequacy within a framework that makes capital requirements, in part, dependent on the individual risk profiles of financial institutions. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on Republic’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Parent Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities and certain off balance sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Banking regulators have categorized the Bank as well-capitalized. For prompt corrective action, the regulations in accordance with Basel III define “well capitalized” as a 6.5% Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital ratio, an 8.0% Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital ratio, a 10.0% Total Risk-Based Capital ratio and a 5.0% Tier 1 Leverage ratio. Additionally, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, the Company and Bank must hold a capital conservation buffer composed of Common Equity Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital above their minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer began phasing in during 2016 and continues to phase in through 2019 on the following schedule: a capital conservation buffer of 0.625% effective January 1, 2016; 1.25% effective January 1, 2017; 1.875% effective January 1, 2018; and a fully phased in capital conservation buffer of 2.5% on January 1, 2019.
Republic continues to exceed the regulatory requirements for Total Risk Based Capital, Common Equity Tier I Risk Based, Tier I Risk Based Capital and Tier I Leverage Capital. Republic and the Bank intend to maintain a capital position that meets or exceeds the “well-capitalized” requirements as defined by the FRB and the FDIC, in addition to the Capital Conservation Buffer. Republic’s average stockholders’ equity to average assets ratio was 12.59% at March 31, 2017 compared to 13.32% at December 31, 2016. Formal measurements of the capital ratios for Republic and the Bank are performed by the Company at each quarter end.
In 2005, Republic Bancorp Capital Trust (“RBCT”), an unconsolidated trust subsidiary of Republic, was formed and issued $40 million in Trust Preferred Securities (“TPS”). The sole asset of RBCT represents the proceeds of the offering loaned to Republic in exchange for a subordinated note with similar terms to the TPS. The RBCT TPS are treated as part of Republic’s Tier I Capital.
The subordinated note and related interest expense are included in Republic’s consolidated financial statements. The subordinated note paid a fixed interest rate of 6.015% through September 30, 2015 and adjusted to 3-month LIBOR plus 1.42% on a quarterly basis thereafter. The subordinated note matures on December 31, 2035 and is redeemable at the Company’s option on a quarterly basis. The Company chose not to redeem the subordinated note on April 1, 2017, and is currently carrying the note at a cost of LIBOR plus 1.42%.
Table 22 — Capital Ratios
As of March 31, 2017
As of December 31, 2016
Actual
Ratio
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
Republic Bancorp, Inc.
681,176
17.09
655,908
16.37
Republic Bank & Trust Company
579,176
14.56
553,905
13.86
Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
599,571
15.04
584,530
14.59
536,814
13.49
520,985
13.03
Tier 1 (core) capital to risk-weighted assets
638,814
16.03
622,988
15.55
Tier 1 leverage capital to average assets
13.23
13.54
11.12
11.34
95
Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk
Asset/liability management is designed to ensure safety and soundness, maintain liquidity, meet regulatory capital standards and achieve acceptable net interest income based on the Bank’s risk tolerance. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income as a result of market fluctuations in interest rates. The Bank, on an ongoing basis, monitors interest rate and liquidity risk in order to implement appropriate funding and balance sheet strategies. Management considers interest rate risk to be a significant risk to the Bank’s overall earnings and balance sheet.
The interest sensitivity profile of the Bank at any point in time will be impacted by a number of factors. These factors include the mix of interest sensitive assets and liabilities, as well as their relative pricing schedules. It is also influenced by changes in market interest rates, deposit and loan balances and other factors.
The Bank utilizes earnings simulation models as tools to measure interest rate sensitivity, including both a static and dynamic earnings simulation model. A static simulation model is based on current exposures and assumes a constant balance sheet. In contrast, a dynamic simulation model relies on detailed assumptions regarding changes in existing business lines, new business, and changes in management and customer behavior. While the Bank runs the static simulation model as one measure of interest rate risk, historically, the Bank has utilized a dynamic earnings simulation model as its primary interest rate risk tool to measure the potential changes in market interest rates and their subsequent effects on net interest income for a one year time period. This dynamic model projects a “Base” case net interest income over the next 12 months and the effect to net interest income of instantaneous movements in interest rates between various basis point increments equally across all points on the yield curve. Many assumptions based on growth expectations and on the historical behavior of the Bank’s deposit and loan rates and their related balances in relation to changes in interest rates are incorporated into this dynamic model. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the dynamic model cannot precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to the actual timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, the actual timing and magnitude of changes in loan and deposit balances, as well as the actual changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various management strategies as compared to those projected in the various simulated models. Additionally, actual results could differ materially from the model if interest rates do not move equally across all points on the yield curve.
As of March 31, 2017, a dynamic simulation model was run for increases in interest rates from “Up 100” basis points to “Up 400” basis points. A simulation for declining interest rates as of March 31, 2017 was not considered meaningful and is not presented by the Bank because decreases in the Fed Funds Target Rate were considered unlikely as of March 31, 2017. The Federal Open Market Committee raised the FFTR for the second time in a three-month period during March 2017, with further guidance suggesting that increases to the FFTR were more likely than not during 2017.
The following table illustrates the Bank’s projected percent change from its Base net interest income over the period beginning April 1, 2017 and ending March 31, 2018 based on instantaneous movements in interest rates from Up 100 to Up 400 basis points equally across all points on the yield curve. The Bank’s dynamic earnings simulation model excludes all loan fees.
Table 23 — Bank Interest Rate Sensitivity as of March 31, 2017
Increase in Rates
100
200
300
Basis Points
% Change from base net interest income
3.10
2.80
2.00
0.30
Board policy limit on % change from base
(4.00)
(8.00)
(12.00)
(16.00)
The Board of Directors of the Bank has established separate and distinct policy limits for acceptable percent changes in the Bank’s net interest income based on modeled changes in market interest rates. Historically, if model projections of the percent change in net interest income fall outside Board approved limits at a given point in time or are projected to fall outside such limits based on certain trends, the Bank has taken certain actions intended either to bring model projections back within Board approved limits or explain how future anticipated events will correct the current situation. These actions have included, but are not limited to, restructuring of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, seeking additional fixed rate term FHLB advances, executing interest rate swaps and modifying the pricing or terms of loans, leases and deposits. These actions have historically had a negative impact on current earnings.
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Information required by this item is included under Part I, Item 2., “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.”
Item 4.Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by Republic Bancorp, Inc.’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. In addition, no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1.Legal Proceedings.
In the ordinary course of operations, Republic and the Bank are defendants in various legal proceedings. There is no proceeding pending or threatened litigation, to the knowledge of management, in which an adverse decision could result in a material adverse change in the business or consolidated financial position of Republic or the Bank.
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Details of Republic’s Class A Common Stock purchases during the first quarter of 2017 are included in the following table:
Total Number of
Maximum Number
Shares Purchased
of Shares that May
as Part of Publicly
Yet Be Purchased
Average Price
Announced Plans
Under the Plan
Period
Paid Per Share
or Programs
January 1 - January 31
13,964
39.03
February 1 - February 28
March 1 - March 31
236,361
The Company repurchased 13,964 of its shares during the first quarter of 2017. There were no shares exchanged for stock option exercises during the first quarter of 2017. During 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors amended its existing share repurchase program by approving the repurchase of 300,000 additional shares from time to time, as market conditions are deemed attractive to the Company. The repurchase program will remain effective until the total number of shares authorized is repurchased or until Republic’s Board of Directors terminates the program. As of March 31, 2017, the Company had 236,361 shares that could be repurchased under its current share repurchase programs.
During the first quarter of 2017, there were 2,000 shares of Class A Common Stock issued upon conversion of shares of Class B Common Stock by stockholders of Republic in accordance with the share-for-share conversion provision option of the Class B Common Stock. The exemption from registration of newly issued Class A Common Stock relies upon Section (3)(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933.
There were no equity securities of the registrant sold without registration during the quarter covered by this report.
Item 6.Exhibits.
The following exhibits are filed or furnished as a part of this report:
Exhibit Number
Description of Exhibit
10.1
Fifth Amendment dated as of March 15, 2017 to lease dated August 1, 1999, as amended, between Republic Bank & Trust Company and Jaytee Properties, now known as Jaytee-Springhurst, LLC
10.2
Lease between Republic Bank & Trust Company and Jaytee Properties II SPE, LLC dated March 15, 2017, relating to 200 South Seventh Street, Louisville, KY
31.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32*
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Interactive data files: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, (iii) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
* This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant)
Principal Executive Officer:
May 10, 2017
/s/ Steven E. Trager
By:
Steven E. Trager
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer:
/s/ Kevin Sipes
Kevin Sipes
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Accounting Officer