Companies:
11,222
total market cap:
A$219.559 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ AUD
$
USD
๐บ๐ธ
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Capitol Federal Financial
CFFN
#6225
Rank
A$1.54 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
A$12.56
Share price
-1.22%
Change (1 day)
42.60%
Change (1 year)
๐ฆ Banks
๐ณ Financial services
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Capitol Federal Financial
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2015 Q1
Capitol Federal Financial - 10-Q quarterly report FY2015 Q1
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
_________________
Form 10-Q
_________________
(Mark One)
þ
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2014
or
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 001-34814
Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(
Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
27-2631712
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
700 Kansas Avenue, Topeka, Kansas
66603
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:
(785) 235-1341
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes
þ
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "accelerated filer, large accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
þ
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
Smaller Reporting Company
¨
(do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
þ
As of January 23, 2015, there were
140,653,358
shares of Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. common stock outstanding.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page Number
Item 1.
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
3
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014
3
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
5
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the three months ended December 31, 2014
6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
9
Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
26
Financial Condition - Loans Receivable
29
Financial Condition - Asset Quality
34
Financial Condition - Liabilities
42
Financial Condition - Stockholders' Equity
46
Operating Results
47
Comparison of Operating Results for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
51
Comparison of Operating Results for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014
54
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
61
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
67
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
67
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
67
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
67
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
67
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
68
Item 5.
Other Information
68
Item 6.
Exhibits
68
SIGNATURES
69
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
70
PART I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
December 31,
September 30,
2014
2014
ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents (includes interest-earning deposits of $180,257 and $799,340)
$
208,642
$
810,840
Securities:
Available-for-sale ("AFS"), at estimated fair value (amortized cost of $764,850 and $829,558)
777,329
840,790
Held-to-maturity ("HTM"), at amortized cost (estimated fair value of $1,498,096 and $1,571,524)
1,472,914
1,552,699
Loans receivable, net (allowance for credit losses ("ACL") of $9,297 and $9,227)
6,261,619
6,233,170
Federal Home Loan Bank Topeka ("FHLB") stock, at cost
121,306
213,054
Premises and equipment, net
70,997
70,530
Other assets
143,549
143,945
TOTAL ASSETS
$
9,056,356
$
9,865,028
LIABILITIES:
Deposits
$
4,705,012
$
4,655,272
FHLB borrowings
2,570,946
3,369,677
Repurchase agreements
220,000
220,000
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance
23,698
58,105
Income taxes payable
9,210
368
Deferred income tax liabilities, net
23,445
22,367
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
38,116
46,357
Total liabilities
7,590,427
8,372,146
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding
—
—
Common stock, $.01 par value; 1,400,000,000 shares authorized, 140,653,358 and 140,951,203
shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, respectively
1,407
1,410
Additional paid-in capital
1,178,885
1,180,732
Unearned compensation, Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP")
(42,538
)
(42,951
)
Retained earnings
320,413
346,705
Accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI"), net of tax
7,762
6,986
Total stockholders' equity
1,465,929
1,492,882
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
$
9,056,356
$
9,865,028
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
2014
2013
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans receivable
$
58,619
$
56,948
Mortgage-backed securities ("MBS")
10,001
11,962
Investment securities
1,675
2,066
FHLB stock
3,181
1,196
Cash and cash equivalents
1,424
62
Total interest and dividend income
74,900
72,234
INTEREST EXPENSE:
FHLB borrowings
16,988
16,863
Deposits
8,145
8,323
Repurchase agreements
1,731
2,803
Total interest expense
26,864
27,989
NET INTEREST INCOME
48,036
44,245
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
173
515
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES
47,863
43,730
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Retail fees and charges
3,783
3,810
Insurance commissions
549
558
Loan fees
374
450
Income from bank-owned life insurance ("BOLI")
316
338
Other non-interest income
235
344
Total non-interest income
5,257
5,500
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits
10,477
10,726
Information technology and communications
2,568
2,292
Occupancy, net
2,419
2,549
Low income housing partnerships
1,546
1,096
Deposit and loan transaction costs
1,374
1,387
Federal insurance premium
1,282
1,083
Regulatory and outside services
1,296
1,396
Advertising and promotional
889
1,006
Other non-interest expense
1,291
1,252
Total non-interest expense
23,142
22,787
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE
29,978
26,443
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
9,506
8,630
NET INCOME
$
20,472
$
17,813
Basic earnings per share ("EPS")
$
0.15
$
0.12
Diluted EPS
$
0.15
$
0.12
Dividends declared per share
$
0.34
$
0.51
Basic weighted average common shares
136,087,882
142,881,977
Diluted weighted average common shares
136,115,684
142,883,041
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
2014
2013
Net income
$
20,472
$
17,813
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Changes in unrealized holding gains/(losses) on AFS securities,
net of deferred income tax (benefits) expenses of $(471) and $1,642
for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively
776
(2,700
)
Comprehensive income
$
21,248
$
15,113
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Additional
Unearned
Total
Common
Paid-In
Compensation
Retained
Stockholders'
Stock
Capital
ESOP
Earnings
AOCI
Equity
Balance at October 1, 2014
$
1,410
$
1,180,732
$
(42,951
)
$
346,705
$
6,986
$
1,492,882
Net income
20,472
20,472
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
776
776
ESOP activity, net
105
413
518
Restricted stock activity, net
34
34
Stock-based compensation
516
516
Repurchase of common stock
(3
)
(2,532
)
(1,088
)
(3,623
)
Stock options exercised
30
30
Dividends on common stock to
stockholders ($0.34 per share)
(45,676
)
(45,676
)
Balance at December 31, 2014
$
1,407
$
1,178,885
$
(42,538
)
$
320,413
$
7,762
$
1,465,929
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
2014
2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income
$
20,472
$
17,813
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
FHLB stock dividends
(3,181
)
(1,196
)
Provision for credit losses
173
515
Originations of loans receivable held-for-sale ("LHFS")
—
(906
)
Proceeds from sales of LHFS
—
1,453
Amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts on securities
1,427
1,511
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment
1,680
1,539
Amortization of deferred amounts related to FHLB advances, net
1,269
2,080
Common stock committed to be released for allocation - ESOP
518
510
Stock-based compensation
516
548
Changes in:
Other assets, net
833
851
Income taxes payable/receivable
9,483
8,335
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
(4,291
)
(7,950
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
28,899
25,103
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of AFS securities
—
(24,768
)
Purchase of HTM securities
(810
)
(30,896
)
Proceeds from calls, maturities and principal reductions of AFS securities
64,676
96,656
Proceeds from calls, maturities and principal reductions of HTM securities
79,200
79,068
Proceeds from the redemption of FHLB stock
97,179
3,350
Purchases of FHLB stock
(2,250
)
(2,719
)
Net increase in loans receivable
(30,075
)
(66,776
)
Purchases of premises and equipment
(2,536
)
(2,510
)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned ("OREO")
1,040
1,180
Net cash provided by investing activities
206,424
52,585
(Continued)
7
CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
2014
2013
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Dividends paid
(45,676
)
(72,279
)
Deposits, net of withdrawals
49,740
9,462
Proceeds from borrowings
1,550,000
250,000
Repayments on borrowings
(2,350,000
)
(250,000
)
Change in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance
(34,407
)
(33,462
)
Repurchase of common stock
(7,208
)
(7,029
)
Stock options exercised
30
399
Net cash used in financing activities
(837,521
)
(102,909
)
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(602,198
)
(25,221
)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of period
810,840
113,886
End of period
$
208,642
$
88,665
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income tax payments
$
23
$
296
Interest payments
$
25,989
$
26,738
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Loans transferred to OREO
$
1,453
$
840
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
(Concluded)
8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
- The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Capitol Federal® Financial, Inc. (the "Company") and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Capitol Federal Savings Bank (the "Bank"). The Bank has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Capitol Funds, Inc. Capitol Funds, Inc. has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Capitol Federal Mortgage Reinsurance Company. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
- In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2013-04,
Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date.
The ASU provides recognition, measurement, and disclosure guidance for certain obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation is fixed at the reporting date. ASU 2013-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013, which was October 1, 2014 for the Company, and should be applied retrospectively.
The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial condition or result of operations when adopted
.
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-01,
Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects
. The ASU revised the conditions that an entity must meet to elect to use the effective yield method when accounting for qualified affordable housing project investments. Per current accounting guidance, an entity that invests in a qualified affordable housing project may elect to account for that investment using the effective yield method if all required conditions are met. For those investments that are not accounted for using the effective yield method, current accounting guidance requires that the investments be accounted for under either the equity method or the cost method. Certain existing conditions required to be met to use the effective yield method are restrictive and thus prevent many such investments from qualifying for the use of the effective yield method. The ASU replaces the effective yield method with the proportional amortization method and modifies the conditions that an entity must meet to be eligible to use a method other than the equity or cost methods to account for qualified affordable housing project investments. If the modified conditions are met, the ASU permits an entity to use the proportional amortization method to amortize the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the amount of tax credits and other tax benefits received and recognize the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense. Additionally, the ASU requires new disclosures about all investments in qualified affordable housing projects irrespective of the method used to account for the investments. ASU 2014-01 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2014, which is October 1, 2015 for the Company, and should be applied retrospectively.
The ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial condition or result of operations when adopted
.
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04,
Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure.
The ASU clarifies when an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, that is, when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan receivable should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized. The ASU also requires disclosure of both (1) the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by a creditor and (2) the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction. ASU 2014-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2014, which is October 1, 2015 for the Company, and can be applied using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method.
The ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial condition or result of operations when adopted
.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
.
The ASU clarifies principles for recognizing revenue and provides a common revenue standard for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. Additionally, the ASU provides implementation guidance on several topics and requires entities to disclose both quantitative and qualitative information regarding contracts with customers.
ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, which is October 1, 2017 for the Company, and can be applied using either a retrospective or cumulative-effect transition method. Early adoption is not permitted.
The Company has not yet completed its evaluation of this ASU.
9
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-11,
Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures
. The ASU makes limited amendments to the current guidance on accounting for certain repurchase agreements. The ASU also expands disclosure requirements for certain transfers of financial assets accounted for as sales or as secured borrowings. The accounting changes in ASU 2014-11 are effective for the first quarterly period or fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2014, which is January 1, 2015 for the Company, and should be applied using a cumulative-effect transition method. The expanded disclosure requirements for ASU 2014-11 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2014, and for quarterly periods beginning after March 15, 2015, which is April 1, 2015 for the Company. The Company accounts for its repurchase agreements as secured borrowings; therefore, the accounting requirements of ASU 2014-11 are not expected to have an impact on its financial condition or results of operations when adopted.
2.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Shares acquired by the ESOP are not considered in the basic average shares outstanding until the shares are committed for allocation or vested to an employee's individual account. Unvested shares awarded pursuant to the Company's restricted stock benefit plans are treated as participating securities in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method as they contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends. The two-class method is an earnings allocation that determines EPS for each class of common stock and participating security.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
2014
2013
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income
$
20,472
$
17,813
Income allocated to participating securities
(42
)
(50
)
Net income available to common stockholders
$
20,430
$
17,763
Average common shares outstanding
136,087,433
142,881,528
Average committed ESOP shares outstanding
449
449
Total basic average common shares outstanding
136,087,882
142,881,977
Effect of dilutive stock options
27,802
1,064
Total diluted average common shares outstanding
136,115,684
142,883,041
Net EPS:
Basic
$
0.15
$
0.12
Diluted
$
0.15
$
0.12
Antidilutive stock options, excluded
from the diluted average common shares
outstanding calculation
1,246,761
2,403,917
10
3.
SECURITIES
The following tables reflect the amortized cost, estimated fair value, and gross unrealized gains and losses of AFS and HTM securities at the dates presented. The majority of the MBS and investment securities portfolios are composed of securities issued by United States Government-Sponsored Enterprises ("GSEs").
December 31, 2014
Gross
Gross
Estimated
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Fair
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
(Dollars in thousands)
AFS:
GSE debentures
$
504,802
$
364
$
3,896
$
501,270
MBS
257,080
16,317
37
273,360
Trust preferred securities
2,477
—
280
2,197
Municipal bonds
491
11
—
502
764,850
16,692
4,213
777,329
HTM:
MBS
1,437,871
31,432
6,661
1,462,642
Municipal bonds
35,043
452
41
35,454
1,472,914
31,884
6,702
1,498,096
$
2,237,764
$
48,576
$
10,915
$
2,275,425
September 30, 2014
Gross
Gross
Estimated
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Fair
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
(Dollars in thousands)
AFS:
GSE debentures
$
554,811
$
413
$
5,469
$
549,755
MBS
271,138
16,640
172
287,606
Trust preferred securities
2,493
—
197
2,296
Municipal bonds
1,116
17
—
1,133
829,558
17,070
5,838
840,790
HTM:
MBS
1,514,941
31,130
12,935
1,533,136
Municipal bonds
37,758
654
24
38,388
1,552,699
31,784
12,959
1,571,524
$
2,382,257
$
48,854
$
18,797
$
2,412,314
11
The following tables summarize the estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses of those securities on which an unrealized loss at the dates presented was reported and the continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and equal to or greater than 12 months as of the dates presented.
December 31, 2014
Less Than 12 Months
Equal to or Greater Than 12 Months
Estimated
Unrealized
Estimated
Unrealized
Fair Value
Losses
Fair Value
Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
AFS:
GSE debentures
$
24,705
$
120
$
379,866
$
3,776
MBS
10,245
37
—
—
Trust preferred securities
—
—
2,197
280
$
34,950
$
157
$
382,063
$
4,056
HTM:
MBS
$
151,891
$
600
$
330,294
$
6,061
Municipal bonds
6,747
33
734
8
$
158,638
$
633
$
331,028
$
6,069
September 30, 2014
Less Than 12 Months
Equal to or Greater Than 12 Months
Estimated
Unrealized
Estimated
Unrealized
Fair Value
Losses
Fair Value
Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
AFS:
GSE debentures
$
70,666
$
209
$
403,389
$
5,260
MBS
18,571
172
—
—
Trust preferred securities
—
—
2,296
197
$
89,237
$
381
$
405,685
$
5,457
HTM:
MBS
$
353,344
$
2,194
$
409,275
$
10,741
Municipal bonds
4,688
19
739
5
$
358,032
$
2,213
$
410,014
$
10,746
The unrealized losses at December 31, 2014 were primarily a result of an increase in market yields from the time the securities were purchased. In general, as market yields rise, the fair value of securities will decrease; as market yields fall, the fair value of securities will increase. Management generally views changes in fair value caused by changes in interest rates as temporary; therefore, these securities have not been classified as other-than-temporarily impaired. The impairment is also considered temporary because scheduled coupon payments have been made, it is anticipated that the entire principal balance will be collected as scheduled, and management neither intends to sell the securities, nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities before the recovery of the remaining amortized cost amount, which could be at maturity. As a result of the analysis, management does not believe any other-than-temporary impairments existed at December 31, 2014.
12
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities as of December 31, 2014, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual principal repayments may differ from contractual maturities due to prepayment or early call privileges by the issuer.
AFS
HTM
Amortized
Estimated
Amortized
Estimated
Cost
Fair Value
Cost
Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)
One year or less
$
—
$
—
$
2,596
$
2,605
One year through five years
505,293
501,772
22,159
22,547
Five years through ten years
—
—
10,288
10,302
Ten years and thereafter
2,477
2,197
—
—
507,770
503,969
35,043
35,454
MBS
257,080
273,360
1,437,871
1,462,642
$
764,850
$
777,329
$
1,472,914
$
1,498,096
The following table presents the taxable and non-taxable components of interest income on investment securities for the periods presented.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
2014
2013
(Dollars in thousands)
Taxable
$
1,473
$
1,807
Non-taxable
202
259
$
1,675
$
2,066
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities pledged as collateral as of the dates presented.
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
Amortized
Estimated
Amortized
Estimated
Cost
Fair Value
Cost
Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)
FHLB borrowings
$
466,213
$
469,621
$
487,736
$
488,368
Public unit deposits
280,674
284,027
282,464
284,251
Repurchase agreements
239,890
249,276
239,922
247,306
Federal Reserve Bank
24,242
25,316
25,969
27,067
$
1,011,019
$
1,028,240
$
1,036,091
$
1,046,992
13
4. LOANS RECEIVABLE and ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
Loans receivable, net at the dates presented is summarized as follows:
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family
$
5,997,922
$
5,972,031
Multi-family and commercial
104,222
75,677
Construction
80,117
106,790
Total real estate loans
6,182,261
6,154,498
Consumer loans:
Home equity
130,504
130,484
Other
4,486
4,537
Total consumer loans
134,990
135,021
Total loans receivable
6,317,251
6,289,519
Less:
Undisbursed loan funds
52,512
52,001
ACL
9,297
9,227
Discounts/unearned loan fees
23,468
23,687
Premiums/deferred costs
(29,645
)
(28,566
)
$
6,261,619
$
6,233,170
Lending Practices and Underwriting Standards
-
Originating and purchasing one- to four-family loans is the Bank's primary lending business, resulting in a loan concentration in residential first mortgage loans. The Bank purchases one- to four-family loans, on a loan-by-loan basis, from a select group of correspondent lenders, and also originates consumer loans, commercial and multi-family real estate loans, and construction loans secured by residential, multi-family or commercial real estate. As a result of our one- to four-family lending activities, the Bank has a concentration of loans secured by real property located in Kansas and Missouri.
One- to four-family loans
- Full documentation to support an applicant's credit and income, and sufficient funds to cover all applicable fees and reserves at closing, are required on all loans. Loans are underwritten according to the "ability to repay" and "qualified mortgage" standards, as issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB"). Properties securing one- to four-family loans are appraised by either staff appraisers or fee appraisers, both of which are independent of the loan origination function and approved by our Board of Directors.
The underwriting standards for loans purchased from correspondent and nationwide lenders are generally similar to the Bank's internal underwriting standards. The underwriting of correspondent loans is performed by the Bank's underwriters. For the tables within this Note, correspondent purchased loans are included with originated loans, and bulk purchased loans are reported as purchased loans.
The Bank also originates construction-to-permanent loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate. Construction loans are obtained by homeowners who will occupy the property when construction is complete. Construction loans to builders for speculative purposes are not permitted. All construction loans are manually underwritten using the Bank's internal underwriting standards. Construction draw requests and the supporting documentation are reviewed and approved by management. The Bank also performs regular documented inspections of the construction project to ensure the funds are being used for the intended purpose and the project is being completed according to the plans and specifications provided.
Multi-family and commercial loans
- The Bank's multi-family, commercial real estate, and related construction loans are originated by the Bank or are in participation with a lead bank. These loans are granted based on the income producing potential of the property and the financial strength of the borrower and/or guarantor. At the time of origination, loan-to-value ("LTV") ratios on multi-family, commercial real estate, and related construction loans generally cannot exceed
80%
of the appraised value of the property securing the loans. The net operating income, which is the income derived from the operation of the property less all operating expenses, must generally be in excess of the required payments related to the outstanding debt at the time of origination. The Bank generally requires
14
personal guarantees from the borrowers covering a portion of the debt in addition to the security property as collateral for these loans. Appraisals on properties securing these loans are performed by independent state certified fee appraisers.
Consumer loans -
The Bank offers a variety of secured consumer loans, including home equity loans and lines of credit, home improvement loans, auto loans, and loans secured by savings deposits. The Bank also originates a very limited amount of unsecured loans. The Bank does not originate any consumer loans on an indirect basis, such as contracts purchased from retailers of goods or services which have extended credit to their customers. The majority of the consumer loan portfolio is comprised of home equity lines of credit for which the Bank also has the first mortgage or the home equity line of credit is in the first lien position.
The underwriting standards for consumer loans include a determination of an applicant's payment history on other debts and an assessment of an applicant's ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. Although creditworthiness of an applicant is a primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the security in relation to the proposed loan amount.
Credit Quality Indicators
-
Based on the Bank's lending emphasis and underwriting standards, management has segmented the loan portfolio into three segments: (1) one- to four-family loans; (2) consumer loans; and (3) multi-family and commercial loans. The one- to four-family and consumer segments are further segmented into classes for purposes of providing disaggregated information about the credit quality of the loan portfolio. The classes are: one- to four-family loans - originated, one- to four-family loans - purchased, consumer loans - home equity, and consumer loans - other.
The Bank's primary credit quality indicators for the one- to four-family loan and consumer - home equity loan portfolios are delinquency status, asset classifications, LTV ratios, and borrower credit scores. The Bank's primary credit quality indicators for the multi-family and commercial loan and consumer - other loan portfolios are delinquency status and asset classifications.
The following tables present the recorded investment, by class, in loans 30 to 89 days delinquent, loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure, total delinquent loans, total current loans, and total recorded investment at the dates presented. The recorded investment in loans is defined as the unpaid principal balance of a loan (net of unadvanced funds related to loans in process), less charge-offs and inclusive of unearned loan fees and deferred costs. At December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, all loans 90 or more days delinquent were on nonaccrual status.
December 31, 2014
90 or More Days
Total
Total
30 to 89 Days
Delinquent or
Delinquent
Current
Recorded
Delinquent
in Foreclosure
Loans
Loans
Investment
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family loans - originated
$
17,874
$
8,784
$
26,658
$
5,456,306
$
5,482,964
One- to four-family loans - purchased
10,166
7,250
17,416
530,641
548,057
Multi-family and commercial loans
—
—
—
104,905
104,905
Consumer - home equity
916
354
1,270
129,234
130,504
Consumer - other
29
28
57
4,429
4,486
$
28,985
$
16,416
$
45,401
$
6,225,515
$
6,270,916
September 30, 2014
90 or More Days
Total
Total
30 to 89 Days
Delinquent or
Delinquent
Current
Recorded
Delinquent
in Foreclosure
Loans
Loans
Investment
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family loans - originated
$
15,396
$
8,566
$
23,962
$
5,421,112
$
5,445,074
One- to four-family loans - purchased
7,937
7,190
15,127
550,229
565,356
Multi-family and commercial loans
—
—
—
96,946
96,946
Consumer - home equity
770
397
1,167
129,317
130,484
Consumer - other
69
13
82
4,455
4,537
$
24,172
$
16,166
$
40,338
$
6,202,059
$
6,242,397
15
The following table presents the recorded investment, by class, in loans classified as nonaccrual at the dates presented.
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family loans - originated
$
18,864
$
16,546
One- to four-family loans - purchased
8,151
7,940
Multi-family and commercial loans
—
—
Consumer - home equity
445
442
Consumer - other
40
13
$
27,500
$
24,941
In accordance with the Bank's asset classification policy, management regularly reviews the problem loans in the Bank's portfolio to determine whether any loans require classification. Loan classifications are defined as follows:
•
Special mention - These loans are performing loans on which known information about the collateral pledged or the possible credit problems of the borrower(s) have caused management to have doubts as to the ability of the borrower(s) to comply with present loan repayment terms and which may result in the future inclusion of such loans in the non-performing loan categories.
•
Substandard - A loan is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard loans include those characterized by the distinct possibility the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
•
Doubtful - Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts and conditions and values highly questionable and improbable.
•
Loss - Loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets on the books is not warranted.
The following table sets forth the recorded investment in loans classified as special mention or substandard, by class, at the dates presented. Special mention and substandard loans are included in the formula analysis model if the loan is not individually evaluated for loss. Loans classified as doubtful or loss are individually evaluated for loss. At the dates presented, there were
no
loans classified as doubtful, and all loans classified as loss were fully charged-off.
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
Special Mention
Substandard
Special Mention
Substandard
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family - originated
$
16,395
$
31,232
$
20,068
$
29,151
One- to four-family - purchased
2,097
10,888
2,738
11,470
Multi-family and commercial
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity
85
1,047
146
887
Consumer - other
—
39
5
13
$
18,577
$
43,206
$
22,957
$
41,521
16
The following table shows the weighted average credit score and weighted average LTV for originated and purchased one- to four-family loans and originated consumer home equity loans at the dates presented. Borrower credit scores are intended to provide an indication as to the likelihood that a borrower will repay their debts. Credit scores are updated at least semiannually, with the last update in September 2014, from a nationally recognized consumer rating agency. The LTV ratios provide an estimate of the extent to which the Bank may incur a loss on any given loan that may go into foreclosure. The LTV ratios were based on the current loan balance and either the lesser of the purchase price or original appraisal, or the most recent Bank appraisal, if available. In most cases, the most recent appraisal was obtained at the time of origination.
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
Credit Score
LTV
Credit Score
LTV
One- to four-family - originated
764
65
%
764
65
%
One- to four-family - purchased
749
66
749
66
Consumer - home equity
751
18
751
18
762
64
762
64
Troubled Debt Restructurings ("TDRs") -
The following tables present the recorded investment prior to restructuring and immediately after restructuring in all loans restructured during the periods presented. These tables do not reflect the recorded investment at the end of the periods indicated. Any increase in the recorded investment at the time of the restructuring was generally due to the capitalization of delinquent interest and/or escrow balances.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2014
Number
Pre-
Post-
of
Restructured
Restructured
Contracts
Outstanding
Outstanding
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family loans - originated
43
$
5,324
$
5,372
One- to four-family loans - purchased
2
266
268
Multi-family and commercial loans
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity
4
64
65
Consumer - other
3
12
12
52
$
5,666
$
5,717
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2013
Number
Pre-
Post-
of
Restructured
Restructured
Contracts
Outstanding
Outstanding
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family loans - originated
38
$
3,825
$
3,853
One- to four-family loans - purchased
2
198
198
Multi-family and commercial loans
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity
4
65
66
Consumer - other
—
—
—
44
$
4,088
$
4,117
17
The following table provides information on TDRs restructured within the last 12 months that became delinquent during the periods presented.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2014
December 31, 2013
Number of
Recorded
Number of
Recorded
Contracts
Investment
Contracts
Investment
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family loans - originated
19
$
1,757
11
$
816
One- to four-family loans - purchased
2
268
2
338
Multi-family and commercial loans
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity
1
15
—
—
Consumer - other
1
5
—
—
23
$
2,045
13
$
1,154
Impaired loans -
The following information pertains to impaired loans, by class, as of the dates presented. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due, including principal and interest, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
Unpaid
Unpaid
Recorded
Principal
Related
Recorded
Principal
Related
Investment
Balance
ACL
Investment
Balance
ACL
(Dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded
One- to four-family - originated
$
14,163
$
14,795
$
—
$
13,871
$
14,507
$
—
One- to four-family - purchased
11,814
14,049
—
12,405
14,896
—
Multi-family and commercial
—
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity
520
796
—
605
892
—
Consumer - other
24
41
—
13
22
—
26,521
29,681
—
26,894
30,317
—
With an allowance recorded
One- to four-family - originated
26,475
26,580
197
23,675
23,767
107
One- to four-family - purchased
1,503
1,481
47
1,820
1,791
56
Multi-family and commercial
—
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity
701
701
52
464
464
39
Consumer - other
15
15
3
—
—
—
28,694
28,777
299
25,959
26,022
202
Total
One- to four-family - originated
40,638
41,375
197
37,546
38,274
107
One- to four-family - purchased
13,317
15,530
47
14,225
16,687
56
Multi-family and commercial
—
—
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity
1,221
1,497
52
1,069
1,356
39
Consumer - other
39
56
3
13
22
—
$
55,215
$
58,458
$
299
$
52,853
$
56,339
$
202
18
The following information pertains to impaired loans, by class, for the periods presented.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2014
December 31, 2013
Average
Interest
Average
Interest
Recorded
Income
Recorded
Income
Investment
Recognized
Investment
Recognized
(Dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded
One- to four-family - originated
$
13,256
$
113
$
12,872
$
97
One- to four-family - purchased
11,749
51
13,636
45
Multi-family and commercial
—
—
—
—
Consumer - home equity
515
8
569
8
Consumer - other
16
—
3
—
25,536
172
27,080
150
With an allowance recorded
One- to four-family - originated
26,074
272
33,212
319
One- to four-family - purchased
2,122
12
2,858
16
Multi-family and commercial
—
—
54
1
Consumer - home equity
586
6
613
5
Consumer - other
15
—
15
—
28,797
290
36,752
341
Total
One- to four-family - originated
39,330
385
46,084
416
One- to four-family - purchased
13,871
63
16,494
61
Multi-family and commercial
—
—
54
1
Consumer - home equity
1,101
14
1,182
13
Consumer - other
31
—
18
—
$
54,333
$
462
$
63,832
$
491
19
Allowance for Credit Losses
-
The following is a summary of ACL activity, by segment, for the periods presented, and the ending balance of ACL based on the Company's impairment methodology.
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2014
One- to Four-
One- to Four-
One- to Four-
Multi-family
Family -
Family -
Family -
and
Originated
Purchased
Total
Commercial
Consumer
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance
$
6,263
$
2,323
$
8,586
$
400
$
241
$
9,227
Charge-offs
(58
)
(113
)
(171
)
—
(35
)
(206
)
Recoveries
21
54
75
—
28
103
Provision for credit losses
258
(270
)
(12
)
105
80
173
Ending balance
$
6,484
$
1,994
$
8,478
$
505
$
314
$
9,297
For the Quarter Ended December 31, 2013
One- to Four-
One- to Four-
One- to Four-
Multi-family
Family -
Family -
Family -
and
Originated
Purchased
Total
Commercial
Consumer
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance
$
5,771
$
2,486
$
8,257
$
185
$
380
$
8,822
Charge-offs
(88
)
(327
)
(415
)
—
(10
)
(425
)
Recoveries
1
—
1
—
6
7
Provision for credit losses
155
354
509
(3
)
9
515
Ending balance
$
5,839
$
2,513
$
8,352
$
182
$
385
$
8,919
20
The following is a summary of the loan portfolio and related ACL balances, at the dates presented, by loan portfolio segment disaggregated by the Company's impairment method. There was
no
ACL for loans individually evaluated for impairment at either date as all potential losses were charged-off.
December 31, 2014
One- to Four-
One- to Four-
One- to Four-
Multi-family
Family -
Family -
Family -
and
Originated
Purchased
Total
Commercial
Consumer
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Recorded investment in loans
collectively evaluated for impairment
$
5,468,801
$
536,243
$
6,005,044
$
104,905
$
134,446
$
6,244,395
Recorded investment in loans
individually evaluated for impairment
14,163
11,814
25,977
—
544
26,521
$
5,482,964
$
548,057
$
6,031,021
$
104,905
$
134,990
$
6,270,916
ACL for loans collectively
evaluated for impairment
$
6,484
$
1,994
$
8,478
$
506
$
313
$
9,297
September 30, 2014
One- to Four-
One- to Four-
One- to Four-
Multi-family
Family -
Family -
Family -
and
Originated
Purchased
Total
Commercial
Consumer
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Recorded investment in loans
collectively evaluated for impairment
$
5,431,203
$
552,951
$
5,984,154
$
96,946
$
134,403
$
6,215,503
Recorded investment in loans
individually evaluated for impairment
13,871
12,405
26,276
—
618
26,894
$
5,445,074
$
565,356
$
6,010,430
$
96,946
$
135,021
$
6,242,397
ACL for loans collectively
evaluated for impairment
$
6,263
$
2,323
$
8,586
$
400
$
241
$
9,227
21
5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair Value Measurements
– The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and to determine fair value disclosures in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 820 and ASC 825. The Company did not have any liabilities that were measured at fair value at December 31, 2014 or September 30, 2014. The Company's AFS securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets or liabilities on a non-recurring basis, such as OREO and loans individually evaluated for impairment. These non-recurring fair value adjustments involve the application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
The Company groups its assets at fair value in three levels based on the markets in which the assets are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
•
Level 1 - Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
•
Level 2 - Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
•
Level 3 - Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company's own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include the use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques. The results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability.
The Company bases its fair values on the price that would be received from the sale of an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
AFS Securities
- The Company's AFS securities portfolio is carried at estimated fair value, with any unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as AOCI in stockholders' equity. The majority of the securities within the AFS portfolio were issued by GSEs. The Company primarily uses prices obtained from third party pricing services to determine the fair value of its securities. On a quarterly basis, management corroborates a sample of prices obtained from the third party pricing service for Level 2 securities by comparing them to an independent source. If the price provided by the independent source varies by more than a predetermined percentage from the price received from the third party pricing service, then the variance is researched by management. The Company did not have to adjust prices obtained from the third party pricing service when determining the fair value of its securities during the three months ended December 31, 2014 and fiscal year 2014. The Company's major security types, based on the nature and risks of the securities, are:
•
GSE Debentures - Estimated fair values are based on a discounted cash flow method. Cash flows are determined by taking any embedded options into consideration and are discounted using current market yields for similar securities. (Level 2)
•
MBS - Estimated fair values are based on a discounted cash flow method. Cash flows are determined based on prepayment projections of the underlying mortgages and are discounted using current market yields for benchmark securities. (Level 2)
•
Municipal Bonds - Estimated fair values are based on a discounted cash flow method. Cash flows are determined by taking any embedded options into consideration and are discounted using current market yields for securities with similar credit profiles. (Level 2)
•
Trust Preferred Securities - Estimated fair values are based on a discounted cash flow method. Cash flows are determined by taking prepayment and underlying credit considerations into account. The discount rates are derived from secondary trades and bid/offer prices. (Level 3)
22
The following tables provide the level of valuation assumption used to determine the carrying value of the Company's assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the dates presented.
December 31, 2014
Quoted Prices
Significant
Significant
in Active Markets
Other Observable
Unobservable
Carrying
for Identical Assets
Inputs
Inputs
Value
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
(1)
(Dollars in thousands)
AFS Securities:
GSE debentures
$
501,270
$
—
$
501,270
$
—
MBS
273,360
—
273,360
—
Municipal bonds
502
—
502
—
Trust preferred securities
2,197
—
—
2,197
$
777,329
$
—
$
775,132
$
2,197
September 30, 2014
Quoted Prices
Significant
Significant
in Active Markets
Other Observable
Unobservable
Carrying
for Identical Assets
Inputs
Inputs
Value
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
(2)
(Dollars in thousands)
AFS Securities:
GSE debentures
$
549,755
$
—
$
549,755
$
—
MBS
287,606
—
287,606
—
Municipal bonds
1,133
—
1,133
—
Trust preferred securities
2,296
—
—
2,296
$
840,790
$
—
$
838,494
$
2,296
(1)
The Company's Level 3 AFS securities had no activity during the three months ended December 31, 2014, except for principal repayments of
$26 thousand
and increases in net unrealized losses recognized in other comprehensive income. Increases in net unrealized losses included in other comprehensive income for the three months ended December 31, 2014 were
$51 thousand
.
(2)
The Company's Level 3 AFS securities had no activity during the year ended September 30, 2014, except for principal repayments of
$150 thousand
and increases in net unrealized losses recognized in other comprehensive income. Increases in net unrealized losses included in other comprehensive income for the year ended September 30, 2014 were
$16 thousand
.
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for significant assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
Loans Receivable
– The balance of loans individually evaluated for impairment at December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014 was
$26.4 million
and
$26.8 million
, respectively. Substantially all of these loans were secured by residential real estate and were individually evaluated to ensure that the carrying value of the loan was not in excess of the estimated fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs. When no impairment is indicated, the carrying amount is considered to approximate fair value. Fair values were estimated through current appraisals or analyzed based on market indicators. Fair values may be adjusted by management to reflect current economic and market conditions and, as such, are classified as Level 3. Based on this evaluation, the Bank charged-off any loss amounts as of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014; therefore, there was
no
ACL related to these loans.
OREO
– OREO primarily represents real estate acquired as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure and is carried at lower-of-cost or fair value. Fair value is estimated through current appraisals or listing prices, less estimated selling costs. As these properties are actively marketed, estimated fair values may be adjusted by management to reflect current economic and market conditions and, as such, are classified as Level 3. The fair value of OREO at December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014 was
$4.5 million
and
$4.1 million
, respectively.
23
The following tables provide the level of valuation assumptions used to determine the carrying value of the Company's assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at the dates presented.
December 31, 2014
Quoted Prices
Significant
Significant
in Active Markets
Other Observable
Unobservable
Carrying
for Identical Assets
Inputs
Inputs
Value
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
(Dollars in thousands)
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
$
26,448
$
—
$
—
$
26,448
OREO
4,536
—
—
4,536
$
30,984
$
—
$
—
$
30,984
September 30, 2014
Quoted Prices
Significant
Significant
in Active Markets
Other Observable
Unobservable
Carrying
for Identical Assets
Inputs
Inputs
Value
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
(Dollars in thousands)
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
$
26,828
$
—
$
—
$
26,828
OREO
4,094
—
—
4,094
$
30,922
$
—
$
—
$
30,922
Fair Value Disclosures
– The Company determined estimated fair value amounts using available market information and
from a variety of valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of the amount the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and estimation methodologies may have a material impact on the estimated fair value amounts. The fair value estimates presented herein were based on pertinent information available to management as of the dates presented.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments, at the dates presented, were as follows:
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
Estimated
Estimated
Carrying
Fair
Carrying
Fair
Amount
Value
Amount
Value
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
208,642
$
208,642
$
810,840
$
810,840
AFS securities
777,329
777,329
840,790
840,790
HTM securities
1,472,914
1,498,096
1,552,699
1,571,524
Loans receivable
6,261,619
6,518,439
6,233,170
6,429,840
FHLB stock
121,306
121,306
213,054
213,054
Liabilities:
Deposits
4,705,012
4,724,467
4,655,272
4,674,268
FHLB borrowings
2,570,946
2,628,277
3,369,677
3,423,547
Repurchase agreements
220,000
228,564
220,000
227,539
24
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
- The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents are considered to approximate their fair value due to the nature of the financial assets. (Level 1)
HTM Securities
- Estimated fair values of securities are based on one of three methods: (1) quoted market prices where available; (2) quoted market prices for similar instruments if quoted market prices are not available; (3) unobservable data that represents the Bank's assumptions about items that market participants would consider in determining fair value where no market data is available. HTM securities are carried at amortized cost. (Level 2)
Loans Receivable
- The fair value of one- to four-family mortgages and home equity loans are generally estimated using the present value of expected future cash flows, assuming future prepayments and using discount factors determined by prices obtained from securitization markets, less a discount for the cost of servicing and lack of liquidity. The estimated fair value of the Bank's multi-family, commercial, and consumer loans are based on the expected future cash flows assuming future prepayments and discount factors based on current offering rates. (Level 3)
FHLB stock
- The carrying value and estimated fair value of FHLB stock equals cost, which is based on redemption at par value. (Level 1)
Deposits
- The estimated fair value of demand deposits, savings, and money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The estimated fair value of these deposits at December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014 was
$2.18 billion
and
$2.12 billion
, respectively. (Level 1) The fair value of certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current London Interbank Offered Rates ("LIBOR"). The estimated fair value of certificates of deposit at December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014 was
$2.54 billion
and
$2.55 billion
, respectively. (Level 2)
FHLB borrowings and Repurchase Agreements -
The fair value of fixed-maturity borrowed funds is estimated by discounting estimated future cash flows using current offer rates. (Level 2) The carrying value of FHLB line of credit is considered to approximate its fair value due to the nature of the financial liability. (Level 1)
6. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In preparing these financial statements, management has evaluated events occurring subsequent to December 31, 2014, for potential recognition and disclosure. There have been no material events or transactions which would require adjustments to the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2014.
25
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary may, from time to time, make written or oral "forward-looking statements," including statements contained in documents filed or furnished by the Company with the SEC. These forward-looking statements may be included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in the Company's reports to stockholders, in the Company's press releases, and in other communications by the Company, which are made in good faith by us pursuant to the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These forward-looking statements include statements about our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions, which are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, and are subject to change based on various factors, some of which are beyond our control. The words "may," "could," "should," "would," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "plan" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause our future results to differ materially from the plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates and intentions expressed in the forward-looking statements:
•
our ability to continue to maintain overhead costs at reasonable levels;
•
our ability to continue to originate and purchase a sufficient volume of one- to four-family loans in order to at least maintain the balance of that portfolio at a level desired by management;
•
our ability to invest funds in wholesale or secondary markets at favorable yields compared to the related funding source;
•
our ability to access cost-effective funding;
•
the future earnings and capital levels of the Bank and the continued non-objection by our primary federal banking regulators, to the extent required, to distribute capital from the Bank to the Company, which could affect the ability of the Company to pay dividends in accordance with its dividend policy;
•
fluctuations in deposit flows, loan demand, and/or real estate values, as well as unemployment levels, which may adversely affect our business;
•
the credit risks of lending and investing activities, including changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and charge-offs, changes in home values, and changes in estimates of the adequacy of the ACL;
•
results of examinations of the Bank and the Company by their respective primary federal banking regulators, including the possibility that the regulators may, among other things, require us to increase our ACL;
•
changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines;
•
the strength of the U.S. economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct operations, including areas where we have purchased large amounts of correspondent loans;
•
the effects of, and changes in, trade, fiscal policies and laws, and monetary and interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("FRB");
•
the effects of, and changes in, foreign and military policies of the United States government;
•
inflation, interest rate, market, monetary, and currency fluctuations;
•
the timely development and acceptance of our new products and services and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including the features, pricing, and quality compared to competitors' products and services;
•
the willingness of users to substitute competitors' products and services for our products and services;
•
our success in gaining regulatory approval of our products and services and branching locations, when required;
•
the impact of changes in financial services laws and regulations, including laws concerning taxes, banking, securities, consumer protection and insurance and the impact of other governmental initiatives affecting the financial services industry;
•
implementing business initiatives may be more difficult or expensive than anticipated;
•
significant litigation;
•
technological changes;
•
acquisitions and dispositions;
•
changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and
•
our success at managing the risks involved in our business.
This list of important factors is not all inclusive. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company or the Bank.
As used in this Form 10-Q, unless the context indicates otherwise, "the Company," "we," "us," and "our" refer to Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. a Maryland corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries. "Capitol Federal Savings," and "the Bank," refer to Capitol Federal Savings Bank, a federal savings bank and the wholly-owned subsidiary of Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
The following discussion and analysis is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and capital resources of the Company. The Bank comprises almost all of the consolidated assets and liabilities of the Company and the Company is dependent primarily upon the performance of the Bank for the results of its operations. Because of this relationship, references to management actions, strategies and results of actions apply to both the Bank and the Company. This discussion and
26
analysis should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, filed with the SEC.
Executive Summary
The following summary should be read in conjunction with the Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section in its entirety.
We have been, and intend to continue to be, a community-oriented financial institution offering a variety of financial services to meet the needs of the communities we serve. We attract retail deposits from the general public and invest those funds primarily in permanent loans secured by first mortgages on owner-occupied, one- to four-family residences. We also originate consumer loans primarily secured by mortgages on one- to four-family residences, commercial and multi-family real estate loans, and construction loans secured by residential, multi-family, or commercial real estate. While our primary business is the origination of one- to four-family mortgage loans funded through retail deposits, we also purchase whole one- to four-family mortgage loans from correspondent and nationwide lenders, participate in loans with other lenders that are secured by multi-family or commercial real estate, and invest in certain investment securities and MBS using funding from retail deposits, FHLB borrowings, and repurchase agreements.
The Company's results of operations are primarily dependent on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest earned on loans, MBS, investment securities, and cash, and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. On a weekly basis, management reviews deposit flows, loan demand, cash levels, and changes in several market rates to assess all pricing strategies. The Bank's pricing strategy for first mortgage loan products includes setting interest rates based on secondary market prices and local competitor pricing for our local lending markets, and secondary market prices and national competitor pricing for our correspondent lending markets. Generally, deposit pricing is based upon a survey of competitors in the Bank's market areas, and the need to attract funding and retain maturing deposits. The majority of our loans are fixed-rate products with maturities up to 30 years, while the majority of our retail deposits have maturity or repricing dates of less than two years.
The Company is significantly affected by prevailing economic conditions, including federal monetary and fiscal policies and federal regulation of financial institutions. Retail deposit balances are influenced by a number of factors, including interest rates paid on competing investment products, the level of personal income, and the personal rate of savings within our market areas. Lending activities are influenced by the demand for housing and other loans, our loan underwriting guidelines compared to those of our competitors, as well as interest rate pricing competition from other lending institutions.
The Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve (the "FOMC") noted in their January 2015 statement that economic activity has expanded at a solid pace. Labor market conditions further improved with strong job gains and lower unemployment as underutilization of labor resources continued to diminish. The FOMC stated that household spending and business fixed investment continued to advance, but recovery in the housing sector remained slow. Inflation declined further below the FOMC's longer-run objective and is anticipated to decline even further in the near term; however, FOMC members expect inflation to rise gradually toward 2% over the medium term as the labor market improves further and the transitory effects of lower energy prices and other factors dissipate. The FOMC maintained its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency MBS in agency MBS, and rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. The FOMC reaffirmed its view that the current 0% to 0.25% target range for the federal funds rate remains appropriate and that, based on their current assessment, they can be patient in beginning to normalize the stance of monetary policy. If incoming information indicates faster progress toward the FOMC's employment and inflation objectives, then increases in the federal funds target range are likely to occur sooner than currently anticipated. Conversely, if progress proves to be more restrictive than expected, then increases in the federal funds target range are likely to occur later than currently anticipated. Even after employment and inflation are near mandate-consistent levels, economic conditions may, for some time, warrant keeping the target federal funds rate below levels the FOMC views as normal in the long run. When the FOMC decides to begin to remove policy accommodation, they stated they will take a balanced approach consistent with their longer-run goals of maximum employment and inflation of 2%.
Economic conditions in the Bank's local market areas have a significant impact on the ability of borrowers to repay loans and the value of the collateral securing these loans. The industries in our market areas are very diversified, specifically in the Kansas City metropolitan statistical area which comprises the largest segment of our loan portfolio and deposit base. As of December 2014, the unemployment rate was 4.2% for Kansas and 5.4% for Missouri, compared to the national average of 5.6%, based on information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Kansas City market area has an average household income of approximately $74 thousand per annum, based on 2014 estimates from the American Community Survey, which is a statistical survey by the U.S. Census Bureau. The average household income in our combined market areas is approximately $69 thousand per annum, with 90% of the population at or above the poverty level, also based on the 2014 estimates from the American Community Survey. The Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA") price index for Kansas and Missouri has not experienced significant fluctuations during the past 10 years, unlike other market areas of the United States, which indicates relative stability in property values in our local market areas.
27
For the quarter ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized net income of $20.5 million, compared to net income of $17.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2013. The $2.7 million, or 14.9%, increase in net income was due primarily to a $3.8 million increase in net interest income, partially offset by an $876 thousand increase in income tax expense due mainly to an increase in pre-tax income.
Net income attributable to the daily leverage strategy was $795 thousand during the current quarter. The daily leverage strategy, implemented during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014, involves borrowing up to $2.10 billion on the Bank's FHLB line of credit in two leverage tiers. The first tier of $800.0 million is intended to remain borrowed on the FHLB line of credit for an extended period of time, but will be paid off prior to the December and June quarter ends, only to be re-borrowed at the beginning of the subsequent quarter, to minimize regulatory fees. The second tier of $1.30 billion is borrowed at the beginning of each quarter and paid off prior to each quarter end. The proceeds of the borrowings, net of the required FHLB stock holdings, are deposited at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. The pre-tax yield of the daily leverage strategy, which is defined as the annualized pre-tax income resulting from the transaction as a percentage of the average interest-earning assets associated with the transaction, was 0.22% for the current quarter.
The net interest margin for the current quarter was 1.76%, a decrease of 22 basis points from 1.98% for the prior year quarter. Excluding the effects of the daily leverage strategy, the net interest margin would have been 2.11% for the current quarter, or a 13 basis point increase from the prior year quarter. The increase was primarily a result of decreases in the cost of funds and a shift in the mix of interest-earning assets from relatively lower yielding securities to higher yielding loans.
Total assets were $9.06 billion at December 31, 2014 compared to $9.87 billion at September 30, 2014. The $808.7 million decrease was due primarily to a $602.2 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents and a $91.7 million decrease in FHLB stock, both of which were a direct result of the removal of the daily leverage strategy at the end of the current quarter to minimize regulatory fees. The daily leverage strategy was reimplemented on January 2, 2015. The remaining decrease in total assets was due primarily to a $143.2 million decrease in the securities portfolio, partially offset by a $28.4 million increase in loans receivable, net. During the current quarter, the Bank originated and refinanced $140.1 million of loans with a weighted average rate of 3.74%, purchased $102.4 million of loans from correspondent lenders with a weighted average rate of 3.55%, and participated in $15.7 million of commercial real estate loans with a weighted average rate of 3.79%.
Total liabilities were $7.59 billion at December 31, 2014 compared to $8.37 billion at September 30, 2014. The $781.7 million decrease was due primarily to an $800.0 million decrease on the FHLB line of credit as a result of the removal of the daily leverage strategy at the end of the current quarter, as well as to a $34.4 million decrease in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance resulting from the payment of real estate taxes and insurance on behalf of our borrowers, partially offset by a $49.7 million increase in the deposit portfolio.
Stockholders' equity was $1.47 billion at December 31, 2014 compared to $1.49 billion at September 30, 2014. The $27.0 million decrease was due primarily to the payment of $45.7 million in dividends and the repurchase of $3.6 million of stock, partially offset by net income of $20.5 million.
Available Information
Financial and other Company information, including press releases, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports can be obtained free of charge from our investor relations website, http://ir.capfed.com. SEC filings are available on our website immediately after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC, and are also available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our most critical accounting policies are the methodologies used to determine the ACL and fair value measurements. These policies are important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations, involve a high degree of complexity, and require management to make difficult and subjective judgments that may require assumptions or estimates about highly uncertain matters. The use of different judgments, assumptions, and estimates could cause reported results to differ materially. These critical accounting policies and their application are reviewed at least annually by the audit committee of our Board of Directors. For a full discussion of our critical accounting policies, see Item 7 - "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.
28
Financial
Condition
The following table presents selected balance sheet information as of the dates presented.
December 31,
September 30,
June 30,
March 31,
December 31,
2014
2014
2014
2014
2013
(Dollars in thousands)
Total assets
$
9,056,356
$
9,865,028
$
9,031,039
$
9,115,417
$
9,111,054
Cash and cash equivalents
208,642
810,840
88,424
114,835
88,665
AFS securities
777,329
840,790
857,372
895,623
993,593
HTM securities
1,472,914
1,552,699
1,637,043
1,720,283
1,668,484
Loans receivable, net
6,261,619
6,233,170
6,132,520
6,053,897
6,024,589
FHLB stock
121,306
213,054
112,876
125,829
129,095
Deposits
4,705,012
4,655,272
4,654,862
4,693,762
4,620,908
FHLB borrowings
2,570,946
3,369,677
2,468,420
2,467,169
2,515,618
Repurchase agreements
220,000
220,000
320,000
320,000
320,000
Stockholders' equity
1,465,929
1,492,882
1,498,907
1,530,005
1,569,463
Equity to total assets at end of period
16.2
%
15.1
%
16.6
%
16.8
%
17.2
%
Loans Receivable.
Loans receivable, net, increased $28.4 million, or 0.5%, to $6.26 billion at December 31, 2014, from $6.23 billion at September 30, 2014. The increase in the loan portfolio was primarily in the correspondent one- to four-family purchased loan portfolio.
Included in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2014 were $92.3 million, or 1.5% of the total loan portfolio, of adjustable-rate mortgage ("ARM") loans that were originated as interest-only. Of these interest-only loans, $77.9 million were purchased in bulk loan packages from nationwide lenders, primarily during fiscal year 2005. Interest-only ARM loans do not typically require principal payments during their initial term, and have initial interest-only terms of either 5 or 10 years. The $77.9 million of bulk purchased interest-only ARM loans had a weighted average credit score of 724 and a weighted average LTV ratio of 70% at December 31, 2014. At December 31, 2014, $46.2 million, or 50%, of the interest-only loans were still in their interest-only payment term and $4.1 million, or 15% of non-performing loans, were interest-only ARMs.
29
The following table presents the balance and weighted average rate of our loan portfolio as of the dates indicated. Within the one- to four-family loan portfolio at December 31, 2014, 66% of the loans had a balance at origination of less than $417 thousand.
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
Amount
Rate
Amount
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate loans:
One- to four-family
$
5,997,922
3.70
%
$
5,972,031
3.72
%
Multi-family and commercial
104,222
4.24
75,677
4.39
Construction:
One- to four-family
64,597
3.70
72,113
3.66
Multi-family and commercial
15,520
3.79
34,677
4.01
Total real estate loans
6,182,261
3.71
6,154,498
3.73
Consumer loans:
Home equity
130,504
5.11
130,484
5.14
Other
4,486
4.15
4,537
4.16
Total consumer loans
134,990
5.08
135,021
5.11
Total loans receivable
6,317,251
3.74
6,289,519
3.76
Less:
Undisbursed loan funds
52,512
52,001
ACL
9,297
9,227
Discounts/unearned loan fees
23,468
23,687
Premiums/deferred costs
(29,645
)
(28,566
)
Total loans receivable, net
$
6,261,619
$
6,233,170
The following table presents, for our portfolio of one- to four-family loans, the balance, percentage of total, weighted average credit score, weighted average LTV ratio, and the average balance per loan at the dates presented. Credit scores are updated at least semiannually, with the last update in September 2014, from a nationally recognized consumer rating agency. The LTV ratios were based on the current loan balance and either the lesser of the purchase price or original appraisal, or the most recent Bank appraisal, if available. In most cases, the most recent appraisal was obtained at the time of origination.
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
% of
Credit
Average
% of
Credit
Average
Amount
Total
Score
LTV
Balance
Amount
Total
Score
LTV
Balance
(Dollars in thousands)
Originated
$
3,960,018
66.0
%
764
64
%
$
127
$
3,978,396
66.6
%
764
64
%
$
127
Correspondent purchased
1,493,189
24.9
764
68
331
1,431,745
24.0
764
68
332
Bulk purchased
544,715
9.1
750
66
311
561,890
9.4
749
67
311
$
5,997,922
100.0
%
763
65
160
$
5,972,031
100.0
%
763
65
159
30
The following tables summarize activity in the loan portfolio, along with weighted average rates where applicable, for the periods indicated, excluding changes in undisbursed loan funds, ACL, discounts/unearned loan fees, and premiums/deferred costs. Loans that were paid-off as a result of refinances are included in repayments. Purchased loans include purchases from correspondent and nationwide lenders. There were no loan purchases from nationwide lenders during the periods presented. Loan endorsements are not included in the activity in the following table because a new loan is not generated at the time of the endorsement. The endorsed balance and rate are included in the ending loan portfolio balance and rate.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
March 31, 2014
Amount
Rate
Amount
Rate
Amount
Rate
Amount
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance
$
6,289,519
3.76
%
$
6,197,114
3.78
%
$
6,117,440
3.79
%
$
6,095,089
3.80
%
Originated and refinanced:
Fixed
101,270
3.74
116,296
3.88
98,668
4.11
63,921
4.09
Adjustable
38,878
3.75
47,025
3.67
48,106
3.75
38,790
3.76
Purchased and participations:
Fixed
94,374
3.74
127,814
3.75
122,407
4.03
65,793
4.00
Adjustable
23,705
2.96
44,417
3.07
40,344
3.12
32,932
3.27
Repayments
(228,940
)
(241,320
)
(228,911
)
(177,411
)
Principal charge-offs, net
(103
)
(282
)
(192
)
(112
)
Other
(1,452
)
(1,545
)
(748
)
(1,562
)
Ending balance
$
6,317,251
3.74
$
6,289,519
3.76
$
6,197,114
3.78
$
6,117,440
3.79
The Bank's pricing strategy for first mortgage loan products includes setting interest rates based on secondary market prices and local competitor pricing for our local lending markets, and secondary market prices and national competitor pricing for our correspondent lending markets. During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, the average rate offered on the Bank's 30-year fixed-rate one- to four-family loans, with no points paid by the borrower, was approximately 170 basis points above the average 10-year Treasury rate, while the average rate offered on the Bank's 15-year fixed-rate one- to four-family loans was approximately 80 basis points above the average 10-year Treasury rate.
31
The following table presents loan origination, refinance, and purchase activity for the periods indicated, excluding endorsement activity, along with associated weighted average rates and percent of total. Loan originations, purchases and refinances are reported together. The fixed-rate one- to four-family loans less than or equal to 15 years have an original maturity at origination of less than or equal to 15 years, while fixed-rate one- to four-family loans greater than 15 years have an original maturity at origination of greater than 15 years. The adjustable-rate one- to four-family loans less than or equal to 36 months have a term to first reset of less than or equal to 36 months at origination and adjustable-rate one- to four-family loans greater than 36 months have a term to first reset of greater than 36 months at origination. Of the $119.7 million of one- to four-family loans originated and refinanced during the current quarter, 79% had loan values of $417 thousand or less. Of the $102.4 million of one- to four-family correspondent loans purchased during the current quarter, 35% had loan values of $417 thousand or less.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2014
December 31, 2013
Amount
Rate
% of Total
Amount
Rate
% of Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed-rate:
One- to four-family:
<= 15 years
$
59,885
3.13
%
23.2
%
$
51,403
3.32
%
17.5
%
> 15 years
117,319
4.02
45.4
146,059
4.18
49.6
Multi-family and commercial real estate
17,350
3.77
6.7
5,000
4.00
1.7
Home equity
888
6.21
0.3
733
6.05
0.2
Other
202
8.08
0.1
169
11.08
0.1
Total fixed-rate
195,644
3.74
75.7
203,364
3.97
69.1
Adjustable-rate:
One- to four-family:
<= 36 months
1,367
2.63
0.5
2,030
2.76
0.7
> 36 months
43,530
3.01
16.9
57,972
3.09
19.7
Multi-family and commercial real estate
—
—
—
11,763
4.25
4.0
Home equity
17,261
4.63
6.7
18,739
4.64
6.4
Other
425
3.33
0.2
310
2.88
0.1
Total adjustable-rate
62,583
3.45
24.3
90,814
3.55
30.9
Total originated, refinanced and purchased
$
258,227
3.67
100.0
%
$
294,178
3.84
100.0
%
Purchased and participation loans included above:
Fixed-rate:
Correspondent - one- to four-family
$
78,704
3.73
$
89,535
4.00
Participations - commercial real estate
15,670
3.79
5,000
4.00
Total fixed-rate purchased/participations
94,374
3.74
94,535
4.00
Adjustable-rate:
Correspondent - one- to four-family
23,705
2.96
33,778
3.03
Participations - commercial real estate
—
—
11,763
4.25
Total adjustable-rate purchased/participations
23,705
2.96
45,541
3.34
Total purchased/participation loans
$
118,079
3.58
$
140,076
3.78
32
T
he following ta
ble presents originated, refinanced, and correspondent activity in our one- to four-family loan portfolio, excluding endorsement activity, along with associated weighted average LTVs and weighted average credit scores for the periods indicated.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2014
December 31, 2013
Credit
Credit
Amount
LTV
Score
Amount
LTV
Score
(Dollars in thousands)
Originated
$
97,008
76
%
769
$
115,506
77
%
768
Refinanced by Bank customers
22,684
67
765
18,645
70
759
Correspondent purchased
102,409
75
766
123,313
74
760
$
222,101
74
767
$
257,464
75
763
The following table presents the amount, percent of total, and weighted average rate, by state, for one- to four-family loan originations and correspondent purchases where originations and purchases in the state exceeded five percent of the total amount originated and purchased during the period indicated.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2014
State
Amount
% of Total
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Kansas
$
111,731
50.3
%
3.62
%
Missouri
55,103
24.8
3.57
Texas
24,770
11.2
3.48
Other states
30,497
13.7
3.48
$
222,101
100.0
%
3.58
The following table summarizes our one- to four-family loan origination, refinance, and correspondent purchase commitments as of December 31, 2014, along with associated weighted average rates. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require the payment of a rate lock fee. A percentage of the commitments are expected to expire unfunded, so the amounts reflected in the table below are not necessarily indicative of future cash requirements.
Fixed-Rate
15 years
More than
Adjustable-
Total
or less
15 years
Rate
Amount
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Originate/refinance
$
14,246
$
34,646
$
16,379
$
65,271
3.55
%
Correspondent
22,089
56,530
27,138
105,757
3.60
$
36,335
$
91,176
$
43,517
$
171,028
3.58
Rate
3.13
%
3.96
%
3.15
%
33
Asset Quality.
The Bank's traditional underwriting guidelines have provided the Bank with generally low delinquencies and low levels of non-performing assets compared to national levels. Of particular importance is the complete and full documentation required for each loan the Bank originates or purchases. One- to four-family owner occupied loans are underwritten according to the "ability to repay" and "qualified mortgage" standards, as issued by the CFPB, with total debt-to-income ratios not exceedin
g 43%
of the borrower's verified income. This allows the Bank to make an informed credit decision based upon a thorough assessment of the borrower's ability to repay the loan. See additional discussion regarding underwriting standards in "Part I, Item 1. Business - Lending Practices and Underwriting Standards" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.
In the following asset quality discussion, unless otherwise noted, correspondent purchased loans are included with originated loans and bulk purchased loans are reported as purchased loans.
Delinquent and non-performing loans and OREO -
The following table presents the Company's 30 to 89 day delinquent loans at the dates indicated. Of the loans 30 to 89 days delinquent at December 31, 2014, 73% were 59 days or less delinquent.
Loans Delinquent for 30 to 89 Days at:
December 31,
September 30,
June 30,
March 31,
December 31,
2014
2014
2014
2014
2013
Number
Amount
Number
Amount
Number
Amount
Number
Amount
Number
Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated
164
$
16,638
138
$
13,074
130
$
14,435
119
$
13,139
178
$
16,956
Correspondent purchased
6
1,280
9
2,335
5
1,301
5
998
4
2,243
Bulk purchased
46
10,047
37
7,860
36
6,826
33
7,272
37
7,858
Consumer loans:
Home equity
41
916
33
770
33
628
35
665
41
721
Other
14
29
18
69
11
40
14
52
17
100
271
$
28,910
235
$
24,108
215
$
23,230
206
$
22,126
277
$
27,878
30 to 89 days delinquent loans
to total loans receivable, net
0.46
%
0.39
%
0.38
%
0.37
%
0.46
%
The table below presents the Company's non-performing loans and OREO at the dates indicated. Non-performing loans are loans that are 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure, and nonaccrual loans that are less than 90 days delinquent but are required to be reported as nonaccrual pursuant to regulatory reporting requirements even if the loans are current. The balance of loans that are current or 30 to 89 days delinquent but required by regulatory reporting requirements to be reported as nonaccrual was $11.1 million at December 31, 2014. At all dates presented, there were no loans 90 or more days delinquent that were still accruing interest. Non-performing assets include non-performing loans and OREO. OREO primarily includes assets acquired in settlement of loans. Over the past 12 months, OREO properties were owned by the Bank, on average, for approximately three months before the properties were sold.
34
Non-Performing Loans and OREO at:
December 31,
September 30,
June 30,
March 31,
December 31,
2014
2014
2014
2014
2013
Number
Amount
Number
Amount
Number
Amount
Number
Amount
Number
Amount
(Dollars in thousands)
Loans 90 or More Days Delinquent or in Foreclosure:
One- to four-family:
Originated
75
$
7,762
82
$
7,880
83
$
8,130
95
$
9,508
110
$
9,931
Correspondent purchased
3
1,039
2
709
2
314
2
443
5
635
Bulk purchased
24
7,191
28
7,120
29
8,322
33
10,301
33
10,134
Consumer loans:
Home equity
20
354
25
397
23
345
23
305
29
477
Other
5
28
4
13
6
24
4
8
8
11
127
16,374
141
16,119
143
17,135
157
20,565
185
21,188
Nonaccrual loans less than 90 Days Delinquent:
(1)
One- to four-family:
Originated
89
9,636
67
7,473
66
8,379
66
7,111
65
6,057
Correspondent purchased
3
492
4
553
2
134
1
478
—
—
Bulk purchased
6
872
5
724
3
630
4
472
3
392
Consumer loans:
Home equity
5
91
2
45
3
61
4
74
6
78
Other
3
12
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
106
11,103
78
8,795
74
9,204
75
8,135
74
6,527
Total non-performing loans
233
27,477
219
24,914
217
26,339
232
28,700
259
27,715
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans
(2)
0.44
%
0.40
%
0.43
%
0.47
%
0.46
%
OREO:
One- to four-family:
Originated
(3)
26
$
2,551
25
$
2,040
24
$
1,430
26
$
1,548
22
$
1,531
Correspondent purchased
—
—
1
179
1
179
4
403
1
110
Bulk purchased
5
685
2
575
2
369
4
398
6
647
Consumer loans:
Home equity
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
18
2
57
Other
(4)
1
1,300
1
1,300
1
1,300
1
1,300
1
1,300
32
4,536
29
4,094
28
3,278
36
3,667
32
3,645
Total non-performing assets
265
$
32,013
248
$
29,008
245
$
29,617
268
$
32,367
291
$
31,360
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets
0.35
%
0.29
%
0.33
%
0.36
%
0.34
%
35
(1)
Represents loans required to be reported as nonaccrual pursuant to regulatory reporting requirements even if the loans are current. At December 31, 2014, September 30, 2014, June 30, 2014, March 31, 2014, and December 31, 2013, this amount was comprised of $2.7 million, $1.1 million, $2.5 million, $881 thousand, and $1.1 million, respectively, of loans that were 30 to 89 days delinquent and are reported as such, and $8.4 million, $7.7 million, $6.7 million, $7.3 million, and $5.4 million, respectively, of loans that were current.
(2)
Excluding loans required to be reported as nonaccrual pursuant to regulatory reporting requirements even if the loans are current, non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans were 0.26%, 0.26%, 0.28%, 0.34%, and 0.35%, at December 31, 2014, September 30, 2014, June 30, 2014, March 31, 2014, and December 31, 2013, respectively.
(3)
Real estate-related consumer loans where we also hold the first mortgage are included in the one- to four-family category as the underlying collateral is one- to four-family property.
(4)
Represents a single property the Bank purchased for a potential branch site but now intends to sell.
Of the $7.2 million of bulk purchased one- to four-family loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure as of December 31, 2014, 93% were originated in calendar year 2004 or 2005. Of the $7.8 million of originated one- to four-family loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure as of December 31, 2014, 72% of the loans were originated in calendar years 2003 to 2009.
Once a one- to four-family loan is generally 180 days delinquent, a new collateral value is obtained through an appraisal, less estimated selling costs and anticipated private mortgage insurance ("PMI") receipts. Any loss amounts identified as a result of this review are charged-off. At December 31, 2014, $12.9 million, or 81%, of the one- to four-family loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure had been individually evaluated for loss and any related losses have been charged-off.
The following table presents the top states where the properties securing our one- to four-family loans are located and the corresponding balance of loans 30 to 89 days delinquent, 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure, and weighted average LTV ratios for loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure at December 31, 2014. The LTV ratios were based on the current loan balance and either the lesser of the purchase price or original appraisal, or the most recent Bank appraisal, if available. At December 31, 2014, potential losses, after taking into consideration anticipated PMI proceeds and estimated selling costs, have been charged-off.
Loans 30 to 89
Loans 90 or More Days Delinquent
One- to Four-Family
Days Delinquent
or in Foreclosure
State
Amount
% of Total
Amount
% of Total
Amount
% of Total
LTV
(Dollars in thousands)
Kansas
$
3,699,367
61.7
%
$
13,612
48.7
%
$
7,802
48.8
%
77
%
Missouri
1,162,377
19.4
4,260
15.2
1,563
9.8
74
California
287,832
4.8
—
—
—
—
n/a
Texas
236,477
3.9
1,268
4.5
—
—
n/a
Tennessee
104,561
1.7
—
—
—
—
n/a
Alabama
84,263
1.4
—
—
—
—
n/a
Oklahoma
75,314
1.3
—
—
329
2.0
63
North Carolina
40,963
0.7
297
1.1
—
—
n/a
Illinois
31,173
0.5
540
1.9
2,240
14.0
64
Nebraska
30,896
0.5
1,744
6.2
—
—
n/a
Colorado
22,506
0.4
165
0.6
—
—
n/a
Massachusetts
20,046
0.3
464
1.7
—
—
n/a
Other states
202,147
3.4
5,615
20.1
4,058
25.4
73
$
5,997,922
100.0
%
$
27,965
100.0
%
$
15,992
100.0
%
74
36
TDRs -
The following table presents the Company's TDRs, based on accrual status, at the dates indicated. At December 31, 2014, $25.8 million of TDRs were included in the ACL formula analysis model and $98 thousand of the ACL was related to these loans. The remaining $14.5 million of TDRs at December 31, 2014 were individually evaluated for loss and any potential losses have been charged-off.
At
December 31,
September 30,
June 30,
March 31,
December 31,
2014
2014
2014
2014
2013
(Dollars in thousands)
Accruing TDRs
$
24,365
$
24,636
$
26,081
$
26,376
$
30,330
Nonaccrual TDRs
(1)
15,912
13,370
13,987
15,061
12,469
Total TDRs
$
40,277
$
38,006
$
40,068
$
41,437
$
42,799
(1)
Nonaccrual TDRs are included in the non-performing loan table above.
37
Allowance for credit losses and provision for credit losses -
Management maintains an ACL to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio based on ongoing quarterly assessments of the loan portfolio. Our ACL methodology considers a number of factors including the trend and composition of delinquent loans, results of foreclosed property and short sale transactions, charge-off activity and trends, the current status and trends of local and national economies (particularly levels of unemployment), trends and current conditions in the real estate and housing markets, loan portfolio growth and concentrations, and certain ACL ratios such as ACL to loans receivable, net and annualized historical losses to ACL. See "Part II, Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.
The ACL is maintained through provisions for credit losses which are either charged to or credited to income. The provision for credit losses is based upon the results of management's quarterly assessment of the ACL. During the three months ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $173 thousand, which takes into account net charge-offs of $103 thousand during the period.
The distribution of our ACL at the dates indicated is summarized below. Correspondent purchased one- to four-family loans are included with originated one- to four-family loans, and bulk purchased one- to four-family loans are reported as purchased one- to four-family loans.
At
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
% of ACL
% of
% of ACL
% of
Amount
to Total
Total
Loans to
Amount
to Total
Total
Loans to
of ACL
ACL
Loans
Total Loans
of ACL
ACL
Loans
Total Loans
(Dollars in thousands)
One- to four-family:
Originated
$
6,455
69.4
%
$
5,453,207
86.3
%
$
6,228
67.5
%
$
5,410,140
86.0
%
Purchased
1,994
21.5
544,715
8.6
2,323
25.2
561,890
8.9
Multi-family and commercial
497
5.3
104,222
1.6
312
3.4
75,677
1.2
Construction
38
0.4
80,117
1.3
123
1.3
106,791
1.7
Consumer:
Home equity
233
2.5
130,504
2.1
211
2.3
130,484
2.1
Other consumer
80
0.9
4,486
0.1
30
0.3
4,537
0.1
$
9,297
100.0
%
$
6,317,251
100.0
%
$
9,227
100.0
%
$
6,289,519
100.0
%
38
The following tables present ACL activity and selected ACL ratios for the periods presented. See "Note 4 - Loans Receivable and Allowance for Credit Losses" for additional information related to ACL activity by loan segment.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
March 31, 2014
December 31, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)
ACL beginning balance
$
9,227
$
9,082
$
8,967
$
8,919
$
8,822
Charge-offs
(206
)
(288
)
(308
)
(121
)
(425
)
Recoveries
103
6
116
9
7
Provision for credit losses
173
427
307
160
515
ACL ending balance
$
9,297
$
9,227
$
9,082
$
8,967
$
8,919
ACL to loans receivable, net at end of period
0.15
%
0.15
%
0.15
%
0.15
%
0.15
%
ACL to non-performing loans at end of period
33.84
37.04
34.48
31.24
32.18
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period
to average loans outstanding during the period
—
—
—
—
0.01
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period
to average non-performing assets
0.34
0.97
0.62
0.35
1.35
ACL to net charge-offs (annualized)
22.6x
8.2x
11.8x
20.0x
5.3x
39
Securities.
The following table presents the distribution of our MBS and investment securities portfolios, at amortized cost, at the dates indicated. Overall, fixed-rate securities comprised 78% of these portfolios at December 31, 2014. The weighted average life ("WAL") is the estimated remaining principal repayment term (in years) after three-month historical prepayment speeds and projected call option assumptions have been applied.
Weighted average yields on tax-exempt securities are not calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis.
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Amount
Yield
WAL
Amount
Yield
WAL
Amount
Yield
WAL
(Dollars in thousands)
Fixed-rate securities:
MBS
$
1,212,911
2.35
%
3.7
$
1,279,990
2.35
%
3.7
$
1,384,297
2.46
%
4.1
GSE debentures
504,802
1.11
2.8
554,811
1.06
2.9
658,834
1.03
3.3
Municipal bonds
35,534
2.11
2.8
38,874
2.29
2.8
36,304
2.68
1.9
Total fixed-rate securities
1,753,247
1.99
3.4
1,873,675
1.97
3.4
2,079,435
2.01
3.8
Adjustable-rate securities:
MBS
482,040
2.26
6.6
506,089
2.24
5.4
572,721
2.31
6.0
Trust preferred securities
2,477
1.50
22.5
2,493
1.49
22.7
2,579
1.50
23.5
Total adjustable-rate securities
484,517
2.26
6.7
508,582
2.24
5.5
575,300
2.31
6.1
Total securities portfolio
$
2,237,764
2.04
4.1
$
2,382,257
2.02
3.9
$
2,654,735
2.07
4.3
The following table presents the carrying value of MBS in our portfolio by issuer at the dates presented.
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA")
$
1,001,802
$
1,052,464
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC")
565,898
598,153
Government National Mortgage Association
143,531
151,930
$
1,711,231
$
1,802,547
40
Mortgage-Backed Securities -
The balance of MBS, which primarily consists of securities of U.S. GSEs, decreased $91.3 million from $1.80 billion at September 30, 2014 to $1.71 billion at December 31, 2014. The following table provides a summary of the activity in our portfolio of MBS for the periods presented. The weighted average yields and WALs for purchases are presented as recorded at the time of purchase. The weighted average yields for the beginning balances are as of the last day of the period previous to the period presented and the weighted average yield for the ending balances are as of the last day of the period presented and are generally derived from recent prepayment activity on the securities in the portfolio as of the dates presented. The beginning and ending WAL is the estimated remaining principal repayment term (in years) after three-month historical prepayment speeds have been applied.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
March 31, 2014
Amount
Yield
WAL
Amount
Yield
WAL
Amount
Yield
WAL
Amount
Yield
WAL
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance - carrying value
$
1,802,547
2.32
%
4.2
$
1,904,010
2.32
%
4.4
$
2,005,138
2.37
%
4.7
$
1,975,164
2.42
%
4.7
Maturities and repayments
(89,795
)
(100,521
)
(99,000
)
(92,609
)
Net amortization of (premiums)/discounts
(1,332
)
(1,464
)
(1,542
)
(1,271
)
Purchases:
Fixed
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
103,730
1.74
3.9
Adjustable
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
21,737
1.92
5.2
Change in valuation on AFS securities
(189
)
522
(586
)
(1,613
)
Ending balance - carrying value
$
1,711,231
2.32
4.5
$
1,802,547
2.32
4.2
$
1,904,010
2.32
4.4
$
2,005,138
2.37
4.7
Investment Securities -
Investment securities, which consist of U.S. GSE debentures (primarily issued by FNMA, FHLMC, or Federal Home Loan Banks) and municipal investments, decreased $51.9 million, from $590.9 million at September 30, 2014 to $539.0 million at December 31, 2014. The following tables provide a summary of the activity of investment securities for the periods presented. The weighted average yields and WALs for purchases are presented as recorded at the time of purchase. The weighted average yields for the beginning balances are as of the last day of the period previous to the period presented and the weighted average yields for the ending balances are as of the last day of the period presented. The increase in the weighted average yield between September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014 was due primarily to lower rate securities being called during the current quarter. The beginning and ending WALs represent the estimated remaining principal repayment terms (in years) of the securities after projected call dates have been considered, based upon market rates at each date presented.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
March 31, 2014
Amount
Yield
WAL
Amount
Yield
WAL
Amount
Yield
WAL
Amount
Yield
WAL
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance - carrying value
$
590,942
1.15
%
3.0
$
590,405
1.15
%
3.4
$
610,768
1.13
%
3.5
$
686,913
1.11
%
3.3
Maturities and calls
(54,081
)
(3,374
)
(28,610
)
(177,805
)
Net amortization of (premiums)/discounts
(95
)
(87
)
(94
)
(84
)
Purchases:
Fixed
810
1.22
5.0
4,702
1.57
5.2
4,421
1.53
6.3
99,393
0.91
2.0
Change in valuation on AFS securities
1,436
(704
)
3,920
2,351
Ending balance - carrying value
$
539,012
1.18
2.9
$
590,942
1.15
3.0
$
590,405
1.15
3.4
$
610,768
1.13
3.5
41
Liabilities.
Total liabilities were $7.59 billion at December 31, 2014 compared to $8.37 billion at September 30, 2014. The $781.7 million decrease was due primarily to an $800.0 million decrease on the FHLB line of credit as a result of the removal of the daily leverage strategy at the end of the current quarter, as well as to a $34.4 million decrease in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance resulting from the payment of real estate taxes and insurance on behalf of our borrowers, partially offset by a $49.7 million increase in the deposit portfolio.
Deposits
-
Deposits were $4.71 billion at December 31, 2014 compared to $4.66 billion at September 30, 2014. The $49.7 million increase was due to a $41.6 million increase in the checking portfolio, a $15.4 million increase in the money market portfolio, and a $2.9 million increase in the savings portfolio, partially offset by a $10.2 million decrease in the certificate of deposit portfolio. We continue to be competitive on deposit rates and, in some cases, our offer rates for certificates of deposit have been higher than peers. If interest rates were to rise, it is possible that our customers may move the funds from their checking, savings and money market accounts to higher yielding deposit products within the Bank or withdraw their funds from these accounts, including certificates of deposit, to invest in higher yielding investments outside of the Bank.
The following table presents the amount, weighted average rate and percentage of total for the components of our deposit portfolio at the dates presented.
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
% of
% of
% of
Amount
Rate
Total
Amount
Rate
Total
Amount
Rate
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing checking
$
174,744
—
%
3.7
%
$
167,045
—
%
3.6
%
$
155,446
—
%
3.3
%
Interest-bearing checking
557,895
0.05
11.8
523,959
0.05
11.2
525,363
0.05
11.4
Savings
299,100
0.15
6.4
296,187
0.15
6.4
285,906
0.10
6.2
Money market
1,151,297
0.23
24.5
1,135,915
0.23
24.4
1,149,229
0.23
24.9
Retail certificates of deposit
2,222,391
1.24
47.2
2,231,737
1.22
47.9
2,203,775
1.24
47.7
Public units/brokered deposits
299,585
0.66
6.4
300,429
0.63
6.5
301,189
0.79
6.5
$
4,705,012
0.70
100.0
%
$
4,655,272
0.70
100.0
%
$
4,620,908
0.71
100.0
%
Brokered deposits totaled $41.9 million at both December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014. The $41.9 million of brokered deposits at December 31, 2014 had a weighted average rate of 2.93% and a remaining term to maturity of four months. The Bank monitors the cost of brokered deposits and considers them as a potential source of funding, provided that investment opportunities are balanced with the funding cost. At December 31, 2014, public unit deposits were $257.7 million, compared to $258.6 million of public unit deposits at September 30, 2014, and had a weighted average rate of 0.29% and an average remaining term to maturity of eight months. Management will continue to monitor the wholesale deposit market for attractive opportunities relative to the use of proceeds.
42
The following tables set forth scheduled maturity information for our certificates of deposit, along with associated weighted average rates, at December 31, 2014.
Amount Due
More than
More than
1 year
1 year to
2 to 3
More than
Total
Rate range
or less
2 years
years
3 years
Amount
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
0.00 – 0.99%
$
772,576
$
255,385
$
26,693
$
35
$
1,054,689
0.51
%
1.00 – 1.99%
169,369
304,904
365,402
358,394
1,198,069
1.43
2.00 – 2.99%
221,351
27,944
38
1,830
251,163
2.51
3.00 – 3.99%
17,287
200
304
—
17,791
3.03
4.00 – 4.99%
189
75
—
—
264
4.40
$
1,180,772
$
588,508
$
392,437
$
360,259
$
2,521,976
1.17
Percent of total
46.8
%
23.3
%
15.6
%
14.3
%
Weighted average rate
0.99
1.15
1.35
1.58
Weighted average maturity (in years)
0.4
1.4
2.6
3.8
1.5
Weighted average maturity for the retail certificate of deposit portfolio (in years)
1.6
Amount Due
Over
Over
3 months
3 to 6
6 to 12
Over
or less
months
months
12 months
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Retail certificates of deposit less than $100,000
$
184,617
$
189,074
$
300,138
$
816,848
$
1,490,677
Retail certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more
70,290
75,105
127,406
458,913
731,714
Brokered deposits less than $100,000
—
41,854
—
—
41,854
Public unit deposits of $100,000 or more
128,878
35,730
27,680
65,443
257,731
$
383,785
$
341,763
$
455,224
$
1,341,204
$
2,521,976
43
Borrowings
- The following table presents term borrowing activity for the periods shown, which includes FHLB advances, at par, and repurchase agreements. Line of credit activity is excluded from the following tables. The weighted average effective rate includes the net impact of the amortization of deferred prepayment penalties resulting from the prepayment of certain FHLB advances and deferred gains related to interest rate swaps previously terminated. Rates on new borrowings are fixed-rate. The weighted average maturity ("WAM") is the remaining weighted average contractual term in years. The beginning and ending WAMs represent the remaining maturity at each date presented. For new borrowings, the WAMs presented are as of the date of issue. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, the Bank prepaid a $150.0 million fixed-rate FHLB advance with a contractual rate of 0.62% and a remaining term-to-maturity of one month. The prepaid FHLB advance was replaced with a $150.0 million fixed-rate advance with a contractual rate of 1.96% (effective rate of 1.97%) and a term of 72 months.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
June 30, 2014
March 31, 2014
Effective
Effective
Effective
Effective
Amount
Rate
WAM
Amount
Rate
WAM
Amount
Rate
WAM
Amount
Rate
WAM
(Dollars in thousands)
Beginning balance
$
2,795,000
2.45
%
2.8
$
2,795,000
2.53
%
2.9
$
2,795,000
2.54
%
2.9
$
2,845,000
2.71
%
2.7
Maturities and prepayments:
FHLB advances
(250,000
)
0.84
—
—
(100,000
)
2.80
(200,000
)
5.01
Repurchase agreements
—
—
(100,000
)
4.20
—
—
—
—
New borrowings:
FHLB advances
250,000
1.99
5.2
100,000
1.96
5.0
100,000
2.45
7.0
150,000
2.59
7.0
Ending balance
$
2,795,000
2.55
3.0
$
2,795,000
2.45
2.8
$
2,795,000
2.53
2.9
$
2,795,000
2.54
2.9
Maturities
-
The following table presents the maturity of FHLB advances, at par, and repurchase agreements, along with associated weighted average contractual and effective rates as of December 31, 2014.
FHLB
Repurchase
Maturity by
Advances
Agreements
Total
Contractual
Effective
Fiscal year
Amount
Amount
Amount
Rate
Rate
(1)
(Dollars in thousands)
2015
$
350,000
$
20,000
$
370,000
2.33
%
2.73
%
2016
575,000
—
575,000
2.29
2.91
2017
500,000
—
500,000
2.69
2.72
2018
200,000
100,000
300,000
2.90
2.90
2019
300,000
—
300,000
1.68
1.68
2020
250,000
100,000
350,000
2.18
2.18
2021
400,000
—
400,000
2.38
2.38
$
2,575,000
$
220,000
$
2,795,000
2.37
2.55
(1)
The effective rate includes the net impact of the amortization of deferred prepayment penalties resulting from the prepayment of certain FHLB advances and deferred gains related to terminated interest rate swaps.
44
The following table presents the maturity and weighted average repricing rate, which is also the weighted average effective rate, of certificates of deposit, split between retail and public unit/brokered deposit amounts, and term borrowings for the next four quarters as of December 31, 2014.
Public Unit/
Retail
Brokered
Term
Maturity by
Certificate
Repricing
Deposit
Repricing
Borrowings
Repricing
Repricing
Quarter End
Amount
Rate
Amount
Rate
Amount
Rate
Total
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
March 31, 2015
$
254,907
1.04
%
$
128,878
0.15
%
$
250,000
2.48
%
$
633,785
1.43
%
June 30, 2015
264,179
1.10
77,584
1.66
100,000
3.01
441,763
1.63
September 30, 2015
254,753
1.25
15,577
0.34
20,000
4.45
290,330
1.42
December 31, 2015
172,791
0.80
12,103
0.52
200,000
1.94
384,894
1.38
$
946,630
1.07
$
234,142
0.68
$
570,000
2.45
$
1,750,772
1.47
45
Stockholders' Equity.
Stockholders' equity was $1.47 billion at December 31, 2014 compared to $1.49 billion at September 30, 2014. The $27.0 million decrease was due primarily to the payment of $45.7 million in dividends and the repurchase of $3.6 million of stock, partially offset by net income of $20.5 million. The $45.7 million in dividends paid during the current quarter consisted of a $0.26 per share, or $35.5 million, true-up dividend related to fiscal year 2014 earnings per the Company's dividend policy, and a regular quarterly dividend of $0.075 per share, or $10.2 million. On January 27, 2015, the Company declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.085 per share, or approximately $11.6 million, payable on February 20, 2015 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 6, 2015.
At December 31, 2014, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc., at the holding company level, had $106.6 million on deposit at the Bank. For fiscal year 2015, it is the intent of the Board of Directors and management to continue with the payout of 100% of the Company's earnings to its stockholders. Dividend payments depend upon a number of factors including the Company's financial condition and results of operations, regulatory capital requirements, regulatory limitations on the Bank's ability to make capital distributions to the Company, and the amount of cash at the holding company.
The following table presents regular quarterly dividends and special dividends paid in calendar years 2015, 2014, and 2013. The amounts represent cash dividends paid during each period. For the quarter ending March 31, 2015, the amount presented does not represent the actual dividend payout, but rather management's estimate of the dividend announced on January 27, 2015 of $0.085 per share.
Calendar Year
2015
2014
2013
(Dollars in thousands)
Regular quarterly dividends paid
Quarter ended March 31
$
11,589
$
10,513
$
11,023
Quarter ended June 30
10,399
10,796
Quarter ended September 30
10,318
10,703
Quarter ended December 31
10,226
10,754
True-up dividends paid
35,450
25,815
True Blue dividends paid
34,663
35,710
Calendar year-to-date dividends paid
$
11,589
$
111,569
$
104,801
In November 2012, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $175.0 million of the Company's common stock. During the current quarter, the Company repurchased 302,145 shares at an average price of $11.99 per share, or $3.6 million. Through January 29, 2015, the Company had repurchased 11,075,854 shares at an average price of $11.94 per share, or $132.2 million. This plan, under which $42.8 million remained available as of January 29, 2015, has no expiration date.
46
Operating Results
The following table presents selected income statement and other information for the quarters indicated.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
September 30,
June 30,
March 31,
December 31,
2014
2014
2014
2014
2013
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Interest and dividend income:
Loans receivable
$
58,619
$
58,405
$
57,474
$
57,117
$
56,948
MBS
10,001
10,535
11,206
11,597
11,962
Investment securities
1,675
1,711
1,739
1,869
2,066
Other interest and dividend income
4,605
3,583
1,502
1,274
1,258
Total interest and dividend income
74,900
74,234
71,921
71,857
72,234
Interest expense:
FHLB borrowings
16,988
16,217
14,826
15,311
16,863
Deposits
8,145
8,081
8,124
8,076
8,323
Repurchase agreements
1,731
1,963
2,773
2,743
2,803
Total interest expense
26,864
26,261
25,723
26,130
27,989
Net interest income
48,036
47,973
46,198
45,727
44,245
Provision for credit losses
173
427
307
160
515
Net interest income
(after provision for credit losses)
47,863
47,546
45,891
45,567
43,730
Non-interest income
5,257
6,109
5,619
5,727
5,500
Non-interest expense
23,142
23,542
22,380
21,828
22,787
Income tax expense
9,506
9,903
9,147
9,778
8,630
Net income
$
20,472
$
20,210
$
19,983
$
19,688
$
17,813
Efficiency ratio
43.42
%
43.53
%
43.19
%
42.42
%
45.81
%
Basic EPS
$
0.15
$
0.15
$
0.14
$
0.14
$
0.12
Diluted EPS
0.15
0.15
0.14
0.14
0.12
47
Average Balance Sheet
The following table presents the average balances of our assets, liabilities, and stockholders' equity and the related annualized yields and rates on our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated and the weighted average yield/rate on our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at December 31, 2014. As previously discussed, the daily leverage strategy was removed in its entirety at December 31, 2014, so the yields/rates presented at December 31, 2014 in the tables below do not reflect the effects of this strategy. Weighted average yields are derived by dividing annualized income by the average balance of the related assets and weighted average rates are derived by dividing annualized expense by the average balance of the related liabilities, for the periods shown. Average outstanding balances are derived from average daily balances. The yields and rates include amortization of fees, costs, premiums and discounts which are considered adjustments to yields/rates. Yields on tax-exempt securities were not calculated on a fully taxable equivalent basis.
At
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
2014
Average
Interest
Average
Interest
Average
Interest
Yield/
Outstanding
Earned/
Yield/
Outstanding
Earned/
Yield/
Outstanding
Earned/
Yield/
Rate
Amount
Paid
Rate
Amount
Paid
Rate
Amount
Paid
Rate
Assets:
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable
(1)
3.73%
$
6,256,458
$
58,619
3.75
%
$
6,187,129
$
58,405
3.77
%
$
6,001,095
$
56,948
3.79
%
MBS
(2)
2.32
1,744,936
10,001
2.29
1,842,563
10,535
2.29
1,994,759
11,962
2.40
Investment securities
(2)(3)
1.18
582,755
1,675
1.15
594,402
1,711
1.15
728,853
2,066
1.13
FHLB stock
5.89
210,569
3,181
5.99
178,888
2,678
5.94
130,492
1,196
3.63
Cash and cash equivalents
0.25
2,126,380
1,424
0.26
1,417,848
905
0.25
98,624
62
0.25
Total interest-earning assets
(1)(2)
3.26
10,921,098
74,900
2.74
10,220,830
74,234
2.90
8,953,823
72,234
3.23
Other noninterest-earning assets
230,598
224,792
220,628
Total assets
$
11,151,696
$
10,445,622
$
9,174,451
Liabilities and stockholders' equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking
0.04
$
695,699
67
0.04
$
690,287
66
0.04
$
651,011
63
0.04
Savings
0.15
297,546
105
0.14
296,077
113
0.15
284,252
72
0.10
Money market
0.23
1,141,099
670
0.23
1,145,269
672
0.23
1,132,744
660
0.23
Retail certificates
1.24
2,225,759
6,820
1.22
2,213,397
6,749
1.21
2,220,986
6,972
1.25
Wholesale certificates
0.66
306,399
483
0.63
305,951
481
0.62
301,773
556
0.73
Total deposits
0.70
4,666,502
8,145
0.69
4,650,981
8,081
0.69
4,590,766
8,323
0.72
FHLB advances
(4)
2.51
2,570,657
15,682
2.42
2,539,504
15,352
2.40
2,514,252
16,862
2.66
FHLB line of credit
—
2,077,174
1,306
0.25
1,407,610
865
0.24
1,087
1
0.20
FHLB borrowings
2.51
4,647,831
16,988
1.45
3,947,114
16,217
1.63
2,515,339
16,863
2.66
Repurchase agreements
3.08
220,000
1,731
3.08
241,739
1,963
3.18
320,000
2,803
3.43
Total borrowings
2.55
4,867,831
18,719
1.52
4,188,853
18,180
1.72
2,835,339
19,666
2.75
Total interest-bearing liabilities
1.39
9,534,333
26,864
1.11
8,839,834
26,261
1.18
7,426,105
27,989
1.49
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities
127,458
100,452
119,463
Stockholders' equity
1,489,905
1,505,336
1,628,883
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
$
11,151,696
$
10,445,622
$
9,174,451
(Continued)
48
At
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
2014
Average
Interest
Average
Interest
Average
Interest
Yield/
Outstanding
Earned/
Yield/
Outstanding
Earned/
Yield/
Outstanding
Earned/
Yield/
Rate
Balance
Paid
Rate
Balance
Paid
Rate
Balance
Paid
Rate
(Dollars in thousands)
Net interest income
(5)
$
48,036
$
47,973
$
44,245
Net interest rate spread
(6)
1.87%
1.63
%
1.72
%
1.74
%
Net interest-earning assets
$
1,386,765
$
1,380,996
$
1,527,718
Net interest margin
(7)
1.76
1.88
1.98
Ratio of interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities
1.15x
1.16x
1.21x
Selected performance ratios:
Return on average assets
0.73
%
0.77
%
0.78
%
Return on average equity
5.50
5.37
4.37
Average equity to average assets
13.36
14.41
17.75
Operating expense ratio
(8)
0.83
0.90
0.99
Efficiency ratio
(9)
43.42
43.53
45.81
Pre-tax yield on daily leverage strategy
(10)
0.22
0.21
N/A
(Concluded)
(1)
Calculated net of unearned loan fees, deferred costs, and undisbursed loan funds. Loans that are 90 or more days delinquent are included in the loans receivable average balance with a yield of zero percent.
(2)
MBS and investment securities classified as AFS are stated at amortized cost, adjusted for unamortized purchase premiums or discounts.
(3)
The average balance of investment securities includes an average balance of nontaxable securities of $36.9 million, $37.1 million, and $36.5 million for the quarters ended December 31, 2014, September 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, respectively.
(4)
The balance and rate of FHLB advances are stated net of deferred gains and deferred prepayment penalties.
(5)
Net interest income represents the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income depends on the balance of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the interest rates earned or paid on them.
(6)
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(7)
Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
(8)
The operating expense ratio represents annualized non-interest expense as a percentage of average assets.
(9)
The efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense as a percentage of the sum of net interest income (pre-provision for credit losses) and non-interest income.
(10)
The pre-tax yield on the daily leverage strategy represents annualized pre-tax income resulting from the transaction as a percentage of the average interest-earning assets associated with the transaction.
49
Rate/Volume Analysis
The table below presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, comparing the quarter ended December 31, 2014 to the quarters ended December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) changes in volume, which are changes in the average balance multiplied by the previous year's average rate and (2) changes in rate, which are changes in the average rate multiplied by the average balance from the previous period. The net changes attributable to the combined impact of both rate and volume have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31, 2014 vs. December 31, 2013
December 31, 2014 vs. September 30, 2014
Increase (Decrease) Due to
Increase (Decrease) Due to
Volume
Rate
Total
Volume
Rate
Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable
$
2,358
$
(687
)
$
1,671
$
646
$
(432
)
$
214
MBS
(1,449
)
(512
)
(1,961
)
(559
)
25
(534
)
Investment securities
(420
)
29
(391
)
(33
)
(3
)
(36
)
FHLB stock
965
1,020
1,985
479
24
503
Cash and cash equivalents
1,359
3
1,362
472
47
519
Total interest-earning assets
2,813
(147
)
2,666
1,005
(339
)
666
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking
4
(1
)
3
1
—
1
Savings
4
30
34
1
(8
)
(7
)
Money market
5
5
10
(3
)
1
(2
)
Certificates of deposit
28
(253
)
(225
)
36
36
72
FHLB borrowings
1,599
(1,474
)
125
587
184
771
Repurchase agreements
(808
)
(264
)
(1,072
)
(171
)
(61
)
(232
)
Total interest-bearing liabilities
832
(1,957
)
(1,125
)
451
152
603
Net change in net interest and dividend income
$
1,981
$
1,810
$
3,791
$
554
$
(491
)
$
63
50
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
For the quarter ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized net income of $20.5 million, compared to net income of $17.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2013. The $2.7 million, or 14.9%, increase in net income was due primarily to a $3.8 million increase in net interest income, partially offset by an $876 thousand increase in income tax expense due mainly to an increase in pre-tax income. The increase in net interest income was due primarily to a $2.3 million decrease in the cost of term borrowings, mainly due to a decrease in rates, along with $1.5 million of net interest income resulting from the daily leverage strategy.
Net income attributable to the daily leverage strategy was $795 thousand for the current quarter. The pre-tax yield on the daily leverage strategy, which is defined as the annualized pre-tax income resulting from the transaction as a percentage of the average interest-earning assets associated with the transaction, was 0.22% for the current quarter.
The net interest margin decreased 22 basis points, from 1.98% for the prior year quarter, to 1.76% for the current quarter as a result of the daily leverage strategy. Excluding the effects of the daily leverage strategy, the net interest margin would have been 2.11% for the current quarter, or a 13 basis point increase from the prior year quarter. This increase was primarily a result of a decrease in the cost of funds, a shift in the mix of interest-earning assets from relatively lower yielding securities to higher yielding loans, and an increase in the dividend rate paid on FHLB stock between the two periods.
Interest and Dividend Income
The weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets decreased 49 basis points, from 3.23% for the prior year quarter, to 2.74% for the current quarter, while the average balance of interest-earning assets increased $1.97 billion from the prior year quarter. The decrease in the weighted average yield and the increase in the average balance were due primarily to the daily leverage strategy. Absent the impact of the daily leverage strategy, the weighted average yield on total interest-earnings assets would have increased three basis points from the prior year quarter, to 3.26%, while the average balance would have decreased $109.9 million. The following table presents the components of interest and dividend income for the time periods presented along with the change measured in dollars and percent.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
Change Expressed in:
2014
2013
Dollars
Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans receivable
$
58,619
$
56,948
$
1,671
2.9
%
MBS
10,001
11,962
(1,961
)
(16.4
)
Investment securities
1,675
2,066
(391
)
(18.9
)
FHLB stock
3,181
1,196
1,985
166.0
Cash and cash equivalents
1,424
62
1,362
2,196.8
Total interest and dividend income
$
74,900
$
72,234
$
2,666
3.7
The increase in interest income on loans receivable was due to a $255.4 million increase in the average balance of the portfolio, partially offset by a decrease in the weighted average yield on the portfolio. The weighted average yield on the loans receivable portfolio decreased four basis points, from 3.79% for the prior year quarter, to 3.75% for the current quarter. The decrease in the weighted average yield was due primarily to downward repricing of adjustable-rate loans, as well as to repayments of higher-yielding loans.
The decrease in interest income on MBS and investment securities was due primarily to a decrease in the average balance of each portfolio as cash flows not reinvested in the portfolios were used, in part, to fund loan growth. The average balance of the MBS portfolio decreased $249.8 million and the average balance of the investment securities portfolio decreased $146.1 million between the two periods. Additionally, the weighted average yield on the MBS portfolio decreased 11 basis points, from 2.40% during the prior year quarter, to 2.29% for the current quarter. The decrease in the weighted average yield on the MBS portfolio was due primarily to purchases of MBS between periods with yields less than the weighted average yield on the existing portfolio, and to repayments of MBS with yields greater than the weighted average yield on the existing portfolio. Included in interest income on MBS for the current quarter was $1.3 million from the net amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts, which decreased the weighted average yield on the portfolio by 31 basis points. During the prior year quarter, $1.4 million of net premiums were amortized and decreased the weighted average yield on the portfolio by 28 basis points. At December 31, 2014, the net balance of premiums/(discounts) on our portfolio of MBS was $17.2 million.
51
The increase in dividends on FHLB stock was due to an increase in the FHLB dividend rate between the two periods, as well as to an $80.1 million increase in the average balance of the portfolio due to the daily leverage strategy. The increase in interest income on cash and cash equivalents was due primarily to a $2.03 billion increase in the average balance resulting mainly from the daily leverage strategy.
Interest Expense
The weighted average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities decreased 38 basis points, from 1.49% for the prior year quarter, to 1.11% for the current quarter, while the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased $2.11 billion from the prior year quarter due primarily to the daily leverage strategy. Absent the impact of the daily leverage strategy, the weighted average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities would have decreased 13 basis points from the prior quarter to 1.36%, while the average balance would have increased $31.1 million. The following table presents the components of interest expense for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
Change Expressed in:
2014
2013
Dollars
Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST EXPENSE:
FHLB borrowings
$
16,988
$
16,863
$
125
0.7
%
Deposits
8,145
8,323
(178
)
(2.1
)
Repurchase agreements
1,731
2,803
(1,072
)
(38.2
)
Total interest expense
$
26,864
$
27,989
$
(1,125
)
(4.0
)
The increase in interest expense on FHLB borrowings was due primarily to a $2.08 billion increase in the average balance on the FHLB line of credit as a result of the daily leverage strategy, offset by a 121 basis point decrease in the weighted average rate paid on the borrowings. The decrease in the weighted average rate paid on the FHLB borrowings portfolio was primarily a result of borrowings on the FHLB line of credit, at an average rate of 0.25% for the current quarter, in conjunction with the daily leverage strategy. Absent the impact of the daily leverage strategy, the average rate paid on FHLB borrowings would have decreased 24 basis points from the prior year quarter, to 2.42% for the current quarter, primarily as a result of renewals of advances to lower market rates between periods.
The decrease in interest expense on deposits was due primarily to a decrease in the weighted average rate paid on the certificate of deposit portfolio. The weighted average rate paid on the certificate of deposit portfolio decreased four basis points, from 1.19% for the prior year quarter to 1.15% for the current quarter.
The decrease in interest expense on repurchase agreements was due to the maturity of a $100.0 million agreement at 4.20% during the prior quarter. The repurchase agreement was replaced with an FHLB advance, which was at a lower rate than the maturing repurchase agreement.
Provision for Credit Losses
The Bank recorded a provision for credit losses during the current quarter of $173 thousand compared to a provision for credit losses during the prior year quarter of $515 thousand. The $173 thousand provision for credit losses in the current quarter takes into account net charge-offs of $103 thousand.
52
Non-Interest Expense
The following table presents the components of non-interest expense for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
Change Expressed in:
2014
2013
Dollars
Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits
$
10,477
$
10,726
$
(249
)
(2.3
)%
Information technology and communications
2,568
2,292
276
12.0
Occupancy, net
2,419
2,549
(130
)
(5.1
)
Low income housing partnerships
1,546
1,096
450
41.1
Deposit and loan transaction costs
1,374
1,387
(13
)
(0.9
)
Federal insurance premium
1,282
1,083
199
18.4
Regulatory and outside services
1,296
1,396
(100
)
(7.2
)
Advertising and promotional
889
1,006
(117
)
(11.6
)
Other non-interest expense
1,291
1,252
39
3.1
Total non-interest expense
$
23,142
$
22,787
$
355
1.6
The increase in information technology and communications expense was primarily related to continued upgrades to our information technology infrastructure. The increase in low income housing partnerships expense was due primarily to a $590 thousand impairment recognized during the current quarter to adjust the book value of the investments to the balance of the remaining related low income housing tax credits. The increase in federal insurance premium was due primarily to the daily leverage strategy.
The Company's efficiency ratio was 43.42% for the current quarter compared to 45.81% for the prior year quarter. The change in the efficiency ratio was due primarily to an increase in net interest income. The efficiency ratio is a measure of a financial institution's total non-interest expense as a percentage of the sum of net interest income (pre-provision for credit losses) and non-interest income. A lower value indicates that the financial institution is generating revenue with a lower level of expense.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $9.5 million for the current quarter compared to $8.6 million for the prior year quarter. The $876 thousand increase between periods was due primarily to an increase in pre-tax income, partially offset by a decrease in the effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for the current quarter was 31.7% compared to 32.6% for the prior year quarter. The difference in the effective income tax rate between quarters was due primarily to an increase in low income housing tax credits in the current fiscal year, partially offset by a decrease in deductible expenses associated with dividends paid on allocated ESOP shares as the prior year quarter included a True Blue Too dividend. Management anticipates the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2015 will be approximately 32% to 33%, based on fiscal year 2015 estimates as of December 31, 2014.
53
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014
Net income increased $262 thousand, or 1.30%, from the prior quarter to $20.5 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. Net income attributable to the daily leverage strategy was $795 thousand for the current quarter, compared to $501 thousand for the prior quarter. The net interest margin decreased 12 basis points from the prior quarter to 1.76% for the current quarter due primarily to a full quarter impact of the daily leverage strategy, which was implemented on August 1, 2014. Excluding the effects of the daily leverage strategy, the net interest margin would have been 2.11% for the current quarter, compared to 2.13% for the prior quarter. The two basis point decrease was due primarily to an increase in the average balance of cash and cash equivalents as cash flows from the securities and deposit portfolios that were not used to fund loan growth were mainly held in cash for operational needs.
Interest and Dividend Income
The weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets for the current quarter decreased 16 basis points from the prior quarter to 2.74%, while the average balance of interest-earning assets increased $700.3 million between the two periods. The decrease in the yield and the increase in the average balance were due primarily to the daily leverage strategy. Absent the impact of the daily leverage strategy, the weighted average yield on total interest-earnings assets would have decreased two basis points from the prior quarter, to 3.26%, while the average balance would have increased $23.1 million. The following table presents the components of interest and dividend income for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
September 30,
Change Expressed in:
2014
2014
Dollars
Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans receivable
$
58,619
$
58,405
$
214
0.4
%
MBS
10,001
10,535
(534
)
(5.1
)
Investment securities
1,675
1,711
(36
)
(2.1
)
FHLB stock
3,181
2,678
503
18.8
Cash and cash equivalents
1,424
905
519
57.3
Total interest and dividend income
$
74,900
$
74,234
$
666
0.9
The increase in interest income on loans receivable was due to a $69.3 million increase in the average balance of the portfolio, partially offset by a two basis point decrease in the weighted average yield on the portfolio, to 3.75% for the current quarter. The decrease in the weighted average yield was due primarily to downward repricing of adjustable-rate loans, as well as to repayments of higher-yielding loans.
The decrease in interest income on MBS was due to a $97.6 million decrease in the average balance of the portfolio as cash flows not reinvested in the portfolio were used primarily to fund loan growth. Included in interest income on MBS for the current quarter was $1.3 million from the net amortization of premiums and the accretion of discounts, which decreased the weighted average yield on the portfolio by 31 basis points. During the prior quarter, $1.5 million of net premiums were amortized and also decreased the weighted average yield on the portfolio by 31 basis points.
The increase in dividends on FHLB stock was due primarily to a $31.7 million increase in the average balance of the portfolio, resulting mainly from a full quarter of the daily leverage strategy. Similarly, the resulting increase in interest income on cash and cash equivalents was also due primarily to a full quarter of the daily leverage strategy, which was the primary driver of the $708.5 million increase in the average balance during the current quarter.
54
Interest Expense
The weighted average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities decreased seven basis points from the prior quarter to 1.11% for the current quarter, while the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased $694.5 million between the two periods. The decrease in the weighted average rate paid and the increase in the average balance was due primarily to a full quarter of the daily leverage strategy. Absent the impact of the daily leverage strategy, the weighted average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities would have increased one basis point from the prior quarter to 1.36%, while the average balance would have increased $17.3 million. The following table presents the components of interest expense for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
September 30,
Change Expressed in:
2014
2014
Dollars
Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST EXPENSE:
FHLB borrowings
$
16,988
$
16,217
$
771
4.8
%
Deposits
8,145
8,081
64
0.8
Repurchase agreements
1,731
1,963
(232
)
(11.8
)
Total interest expense
$
26,864
$
26,261
$
603
2.3
The increase in interest expense on FHLB borrowings was due primarily to a $669.6 million increase in the average balance on the FHLB line of credit as a result of a full quarter impact of the daily leverage strategy, as well as to a $31.2 million increase in the average balance of advances. The increase in the average balance of advances between the two periods was primarily a result of a new $100.0 million advance in the prior quarter that replaced a $100.0 million maturing repurchase agreement. Absent the impact of the daily leverage strategy, the weighted average rate paid on FHLB borrowings would have increased three basis points from the prior quarter, to 2.42% for the current quarter. This increase was due primarily to the renewal of $250.0 million of advances during the current quarter from a weighted average rate of 0.84% to a new weighted average rate of 1.99%.
The decrease in interest expense on repurchase agreements was due primarily to a $21.7 million decrease in the average balance of the portfolio, which was due to a $100.0 million agreement that matured during the prior quarter.
Provision for Credit Losses
The Bank recorded a provision for credit losses during the current quarter of $173 thousand compared to a provision for credit losses during the prior quarter of $427 thousand. The $173 thousand provision for credit losses in the current quarter takes into account net charge-offs of $103 thousand.
Non-Interest Income
The following table presents the components of non-interest income for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
September 30,
Change Expressed in:
2014
2014
Dollars
Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Retail fees and charges
$
3,783
$
3,881
$
(98
)
(2.5
)%
Insurance commissions
549
562
(13
)
(2.3
)
Loan fees
374
347
27
7.8
BOLI
316
992
(676
)
(68.1
)
Other non-interest income
235
327
(92
)
(28.1
)
Total non-interest income
$
5,257
$
6,109
$
(852
)
(13.9
)
Income from BOLI during the prior quarter included death benefits received, which was the primary reason for the quarter-over-quarter decrease.
55
Non-Interest Expense
The following table presents the components of non-interest expense for the time periods presented, along with the change measured in dollars and percent.
For the Three Months Ended
December 31,
September 30,
Change Expressed in:
2014
2014
Dollars
Percent
(Dollars in thousands)
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits
$
10,477
$
11,378
$
(901
)
(7.9
)%
Information technology and communications
2,568
2,444
124
5.1
Occupancy, net
2,419
2,606
(187
)
(7.2
)
Low income housing partnerships
1,546
450
1,096
243.6
Deposit and loan transaction costs
1,374
1,353
21
1.6
Federal insurance premium
1,282
1,272
10
0.8
Regulatory and outside services
1,296
1,582
(286
)
(18.1
)
Advertising and promotional
889
1,370
(481
)
(35.1
)
Other non-interest expense
1,291
1,087
204
18.8
Total non-interest expense
$
23,142
$
23,542
$
(400
)
(1.7
)
The decrease in salaries and employee benefits expense was due primarily to the prior quarter including compensation expense on unallocated ESOP shares related to the True Blue Capitol dividends paid during the prior fiscal year. The increase in low income housing partnerships expense was due primarily to a $590 thousand impairment recognized during the current quarter to adjust the book value of the investments to the balance of the remaining related low income housing tax credits, as well as to amortization expense. The decrease in regulatory and outside services was due primarily to the timing of fees paid for external audit services. The decrease in advertising and promotional expense was due primarily to the timing of media campaign
s and sponsorships.
Included in other non-interest expense in the prior quarter were proceeds from the receipt of PMI payments from one company where the state in which the company is domiciled allowed the company to disburse funds for unpaid claims. There was no such similar receipt in the current quarter, which accounts for a majority of the increase in other non-interest expense quarter-over-quarter. The Company's efficiency ratio was 43.42% for the current quarter compared to 43.53% for the prior quarter.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $9.5 million for the current quarter compared to $9.9 million for the prior quarter. The decrease between periods was due primarily to a decrease in the effective income tax rate from 32.9% for the prior quarter to 31.7% for the current quarter. The decrease in the effective income tax rate between quarters was due primarily to the current quarter including discrete items related to state income tax liabilities, along with an increase in low income housing tax credits in the current fiscal year.
56
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity refers to our ability to generate sufficient cash to fund ongoing operations, to repay maturing certificates of deposit and other deposit withdrawals, to repay maturing borrowings, and to fund loan commitments. Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of our business management. The Company's most available liquid assets are represented by cash and cash equivalents, AFS securities, and short-term investment securities. The Bank's primary sources of funds are deposits, FHLB borrowings, repurchase agreements, repayments and maturities of outstanding loans and MBS and other short-term investments, and funds provided by operations. The Bank's term borrowings primarily have been used to invest in debentures and MBS in an effort to manage the Bank's interest rate risk with the intent to improve the earnings of the Bank while maintaining capital ratios in excess of regulatory standards for well-capitalized financial institutions. In addition, the Bank's focus on managing risk has provided additional liquidity capacity by maintaining a balance of MBS and investment securities available as collateral for borrowings.
We generally intend to maintain cash reserves sufficient to meet short-term liquidity needs, which are routinely forecasted for 10, 30, and 365 days. Additionally, on a monthly basis, we perform a liquidity stress test in accordance with the Interagency Policy Statement on Funding and Liquidity Risk Management. The liquidity stress test incorporates both short-term and long-term liquidity scenarios in order to identify and to quantify liquidity risk. Management also continuously monitors key liquidity statistics related to items such as wholesale funding gaps, borrowings capacity, and available unpledged collateral, along with various liquidity ratios in an effort to further mitigate liquidity risk.
In the event short-term liquidity needs exceed available cash, the Bank has access to a line of credit at the FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank discount window. Per the FHLB's lending guidelines, total FHLB borrowings cannot exceed 40% of total Bank assets, as reported on the Bank's Call Report to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC"), without pre-approval from the FHLB president. In July 2014, the president of the FHLB approved an increase in the Bank's borrowing limit to 55% of total assets for one year in conjunction with the implementation of the daily leverage strategy. The amount that can be borrowed from the Federal Reserve Bank discount window is based upon the fair value of securities pledged as collateral and certain other characteristics of those securities, and is used only when other sources of short-term liquidity are unavailable. Management tests the Bank's access to the Federal Reserve Bank discount window annually with a nominal, overnight borrowing.
If management observes a trend in the amount and frequency of line of credit utilization that is not in conjunction with a planned management strategy, such as the daily leverage strategy, the Bank will likely utilize long-term wholesale borrowing sources such as FHLB advances and/or repurchase agreements to provide permanent fixed-rate funding. The maturity of these borrowings is generally structured in such a way as to stagger maturities in order to mitigate the risk of a highly negative cash flow position at maturity.
The outstanding amount of FHLB advances was $2.58 billion at December 31, 2014, of which $550.0 million was scheduled to mature in the next 12 months. Subsequent to December 31, 2014, the Bank prepaid a $150.0 million advance scheduled to mature during the March 31, 2015 quarter and replaced it with a $150.0 million advance with a term of 72 months. All FHLB borrowings are secured by
certain qualifying loans pursuant to a blanket collateral agreement with the FHLB along with certain securities. The Bank pledged securities with an estimated fair value of $469.6 million as collateral for FHLB borrowings at December 31, 2014. At December 31, 2014, the Bank's ratio of the par value of FHLB borrowings to total assets, as reported to the OCC, was 28%. When the daily leverage strategy was in place during the current quarter, FHLB borrowings to the Bank's total assets were in excess of 40%, and are expected to be in excess of 40% as long as the Bank continues its daily leverage strategy and the FHLB president continues to approve the Bank's borrowing limit being in excess of 40% of total Bank assets. All or a portion of the borrowings against the FHLB line of credit in conjunction with the daily leverage strategy can be repaid at any point in time when the strategy is in effect, if necessary.
At December 31, 2014, the Bank had repurchase agreements of $220.0 million, or approximately 2% of total assets, of which $20.0 million was scheduled to mature in the next 12 months. The Bank may enter into additional repurchase agreements as management deems appropriate, not to exceed 15% of total assets, and subject to a total borrowings limit of 55% as discussed below. The Bank has pledged securities with an estimated fair value of $249.3 million as collateral for repurchase agreements as of December 31, 2014. The securities pledged for the repurchase agreements will be delivered back to the Bank when the repurchase agreements mature.
The Bank's internal policy limits total borrowings to 55% of total assets. At December 31, 2014, the Bank had term borrowings, at par, of $2.80 billion, or approximately 31% of total assets. Additionally, the Bank could utilize the repayment and maturity of outstanding loans, MBS, and other investments for liquidity needs rather than reinvesting such funds into the related portfolios. At December 31, 2014, the Bank had $596.9 million of securities that were eligible but unused as collateral for borrowing or other liquidity needs. This collateral amount is comprised of AFS and HTM securities with individual fair values greater than $10.0 million, which is then reduced by a collateralization ratio of 10% to account for potential market value fluctuations.
57
The Bank has access to and utilizes other sources for liquidity purposes, such as brokered deposits and public unit deposits. As of December 31, 2014, the Bank's policy allows for combined brokered and public unit deposits up to 15% of total deposits. At December 31, 2014, the Bank had brokered and public unit deposits totaling $299.6 million, or approximately 6% of total deposits. Management continuously monitors the wholesale deposit market for opportunities to obtain brokered and public unit deposits at attractive rates. The Bank had pledged securities with an estimated fair value of $284.0 million as collateral for public unit deposits at December 31, 2014. The securities pledged as collateral for public unit deposits are held under joint custody by the FHLB and generally will be released upon deposit maturity.
At December 31, 2014, $1.18 billion of the Bank's $2.52 billion of certificates of deposit was scheduled to mature within one year. Included in the $1.18 billion was $234.1 million of public unit and brokered deposits. Based on our deposit retention experience and our current pricing strategy, we anticipate that a majority of the maturing retail certificates of deposit will renew or transfer to other deposit products at the prevailing rate, although no assurance can be given in this regard. We also anticipate that a majority of the maturing brokered deposits and public unit deposits will be replaced with similar wholesale funding products.
While scheduled payments from the amortization of loans and MBS and payments on short-term investments are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows, prepayments on loans and MBS, and calls of investment securities are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition, and are less predictable sources of funds. To the extent possible, the Bank manages the cash flows of its loan and deposit portfolios by the rates it offers customers.
At December 31, 2014, cash and cash equivalents totaled $208.6 million, a decrease of $602.2 million from September 30, 2014. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents was a direct result of the removal of the daily leverage strategy at the end of the current quarter to minimize regulatory fees. Included in the $208.6 million of cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2014 was $94.5 million related to the redemption of FHLB stock purchased in conjunction with the daily leverage strategy. The FHLB stock was redeemed at December 31, 2014 due to the removal of the daily leverage strategy. The majority of the cash received from the redemption of the FHLB stock was used to purchase FHLB stock when the daily leverage strategy was reimplemented on January 2, 2015. Additionally, cash and cash equivalents held, in excess of the daily leverage strategy, increased between periods as a result of operational needs and from cash flows received from called securities.
During the current quarter, loan originations and purchases, net of principal repayments and related loan activity, resulted in a cash outflow of $30.1 million. See additional discussion regarding loan activity in "Financial Condition - Loans Receivable." During the current quarter, net investment cash inflows were $143.1 million and were used primarily to fund loan growth and maintain cash for operational needs.
At December 31, 2014, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc., at the holding company level, had $106.6 million on deposit at the Bank. During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, the Company paid $45.7 million in cash dividends and repurchased 302,145 shares at a total cost of $3.6 million. See additional discussion regarding dividends and stock repurchases in "Financial Condition - Stockholders' Equity."
As of December 31, 2014, the Bank had in place $11.0 million of agreements in connection with the remodeling of the Bank's Kansas City market area operations center. The project scope includes replacement of all mechanical and electrical systems, interior finishes, and exterior building components, along with an upgrade to our disaster recovery location. The completed project will result in a more energy efficient building which is expected to lower our utility and maintenance expenses. There may be additional agreements and expenses related to the project through early fiscal year 2017, which is when the project is expected to be completed. Costs related to the project will be capitalized and depreciated according to the estimated useful life of the assets as they are placed in service.
58
The following table presents the contractual maturities of our loan, MBS, and investment securities portfolios at December 31, 2014, along with associated weighted average yields. Loans and securities which have adjustable interest rates are shown as maturing in the period during which the contract is due. The table does not reflect the effects of possible prepayments or enforcement of due on sale clauses. As of December 31, 2014, the amortized cost of investment securities in our portfolio which are callable or have pre-refunding dates within one year was $409.9 million.
Loans
(1)
MBS
Investment Securities
Total
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
Amount
Yield
(Dollars in thousands)
Amounts due:
Within one year
$
71,409
3.94
%
$
—
—
%
$
2,596
2.35
%
$
74,005
3.88
%
After one year:
Over one to two years
55,650
3.89
344
5.65
31,017
1.55
87,011
3.06
Over two to three years
13,808
5.14
1,463
4.83
158,318
1.06
173,589
1.42
Over three to five years
68,215
4.86
59,106
4.40
334,596
1.17
461,917
2.13
Over five to ten years
381,377
4.09
473,529
2.10
10,288
1.61
865,194
2.97
Over ten to fifteen years
1,392,992
3.45
680,386
2.28
—
—
2,073,378
3.07
After fifteen years
4,333,800
3.76
496,403
2.34
2,197
1.50
4,832,400
3.61
Total due after one year
6,245,842
3.73
1,711,231
2.32
536,416
1.17
8,493,489
3.28
$
6,317,251
3.73
$
1,711,231
2.32
$
539,012
1.18
$
8,567,494
3.29
(1)
Demand loans, loans having no stated maturity, and overdraft loans are included in the amounts due within one year. Construction loans are presented based on the term to complete construction. The maturity date for home equity loans assumes the customer always makes the required minimum payment.
59
Limitations on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions
The long-term ability of the Company to pay dividends to its stockholders is based primarily upon the ability of the Bank to make capital distributions to the Company. OCC regulations impose restrictions on savings institutions, such as the Bank, with respect to their ability to make distributions of capital, which include dividends, stock redemptions or repurchases, cash-out mergers, and other transactions charged to the capital account. Generally, savings institutions may make capital distributions during any calendar year equal to earnings of the previous two calendar years and current year-to-date earnings under the FRB and OCC safe harbor regulations. It is generally required that the Bank remain well capitalized before and after a proposed distribution; however, an institution deemed to be in need of more than normal supervision by the OCC may have its capital distribution authority restricted. A savings institution that is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, such as the Company, that proposes to make a capital distribution must submit written notice to the OCC and FRB 30 days prior to such distribution. The OCC and FRB may object to the distribution during that 30-day period based on safety and soundness or other concerns. Savings institutions that desire to make a larger capital distribution, are under special restrictions, or are not, or would not be, well capitalized following a proposed capital distribution, however, must obtain regulatory non-objection prior to making such a distribution. So long as the Bank continues to remain well capitalized after each capital distribution and operates in a safe and sound manner, it is management's belief that the OCC and FRB will continue to allow the Bank to distribute its net income to the Company, although no assurance can be given in this regard.
The Company paid cash dividends of $45.7 million during the quarter ended December 31, 2014. Dividend payments depend upon a number of factors including the Company's financial condition and results of operations, regulatory capital requirements, regulatory limitations on the Bank's ability to make capital distributions to the Company, and the amount of cash at the holding company level.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Commitments and Contractual Obligations
The Company, in the normal course of business, makes commitments to buy or sell assets or to incur or fund liabilities. Commitments may include, but are not limited to:
•
the origination, purchase, participation, or sale of loans;
•
the purchase or sale of investment securities and MBS;
•
extensions of credit on home equity loans, construction loans, and commercial loans;
•
terms and conditions of operating leases; and
•
funding withdrawals of deposit accounts at maturity.
There have been no material changes in off-balance sheet arrangements, commitments or contractual obligations from September 30, 2014 except for a decrease in the amount outstanding against the FHLB line of credit in conjunction with the removal of the daily leverage strategy at December 31, 2014, which was reimplemented on January 2, 2015. The maximum balance of short-term FHLB borrowings outstanding at any month-end during the current quarter was $2.70 billion, and the average short-term balance of FHLB borrowings outstanding during the current quarter was $2.63 billion, at a weighted average rate of 0.56%. This compares to a balance of short-term FHLB borrowings outstanding at the end of the current quarter of $550.0 million, at a weighted average rate of 1.72%. We anticipate we will continue to have sufficient funds, through repayments and maturities of loans and securities, deposits and borrowings, to meet our current commitments. For additional information, see "Part II, Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Commitments and Contractual Obligations" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.
Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company and its subsidiary are named defendants in various lawsuits and counter claims. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, none of the currently pending suits are expected to have a materially adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, or future periods.
60
Capital
Consistent with our goal to operate a sound and profitable financial organization, we actively seek to maintain a "well-capitalized" status for the Bank in accordance with regulatory standards. As of December 31, 2014, the Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. The Company currently does not have any regulatory capital requirements. The following table presents the Bank's regulatory capital ratios at December 31, 2014 based upon regulatory guidelines.
Regulatory
Requirement For
Bank
"Well-Capitalized"
Ratios
Status
Tier 1 leverage ratio
14.4
%
5.0
%
Tier 1 risk-based capital
33.2
6.0
Total risk-based capital
33.4
10.0
A reconciliation of the Bank's equity under GAAP to regulatory capital amounts as of December 31, 2014 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Total Bank equity as reported under GAAP
$
1,308,512
Unrealized gains on AFS securities
(7,762
)
Total Tier 1 capital
1,300,750
ACL
9,297
Total risk-based capital
$
1,310,047
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Asset and Liability Management and Market Risk
For a complete discussion of the Bank's asset and liability management policies, as well as the potential impact of interest rate changes upon the market value of the Bank's portfolios, see "Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2014. The analysis presented in the tables below reflect the level of market risk at the Bank, including the cash the holding company has deposited at the Bank.
The rates of interest the Bank earns on its assets and pays on its liabilities are generally established contractually for a period of time. Fluctuations in interest rates have a significant impact not only upon our net income, but also upon the cash flows and market values of our assets and liabilities. Our results of operations, like those of other financial institutions, are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Risk associated with changes in interest rates on the earnings of the Bank and the market value of its financial assets and liabilities is known as interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is our most significant market risk and our ability to adapt to changes in interest rates is known as interest rate risk management.
The general objective of our interest rate risk management program is to determine and manage an appropriate level of interest rate risk while maximizing net interest income in a manner consistent with our policy to reduce, to the extent practicable, the exposure of net interest income to changes in market interest rates. The Asset and Liability Committee regularly reviews the interest rate risk exposure of the Bank by forecasting the impact of hypothetical, alternative interest rate environments on net interest income and the market value of portfolio equity ("MVPE") at various dates. The MVPE is defined as the net of the present value of cash flows from existing assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet instruments. The present values are determined based upon market conditions as of the date of the analysis, as well as in alternative interest rate environments providing potential changes in the MVPE under those alternative interest rate environments. Net interest income is projected in the same alternative interest rate environments with both a static balance sheet and with management strategies considered. The MVPE and net interest income analysis are also conducted to estimate our sensitivity to rates for future time horizons based upon market conditions as of the date of the analysis. In addition to the interest rate environments presented below, management also reviews the impact of non-parallel rate shock scenarios on a quarterly basis. These scenarios consist of flattening and steepening the yield curve by changing short-term and long-term interest rates independent of each other, and simulating cash flows and determining valuations as a result of these hypothetical changes in interest rates to identify rate environments that pose the greatest risk to the Bank. This analysis helps management quantify the Bank's exposure to changes in the shape of the yield curve.
61
For each period presented in the following table, the estimated percentage change in the Bank's net interest income based on the indicated instantaneous, parallel, and permanent change in interest rates is presented. The percentage change in each interest rate environment represents the difference between estimated net interest income in the 0 basis point interest rate environment ("base case," assumes the forward market and product interest rates implied by the yield curve are realized) and the estimated net interest income in each alternative interest rate environment (assumes market and product interest rates have a parallel shift in rates across all maturities by the indicated change in rates). Estimations of net interest income used in preparing the table below were based upon the assumptions that the total composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities do not change materially and that any repricing of assets or liabilities occurs at anticipated product and market rates for the alternative rate environments as of the dates presented. The estimation of net interest income does not include any projected gains or losses related to the sale of loans or securities, or income derived from non-interest income sources, but does include the use of different prepayment assumptions in the alternative interest rate environments. It is important to consider that estimated changes in net interest income are for a cumulative four-quarter period. These do not reflect the earnings expectations of management.
Change
Percentage Change in Net Interest Income
(in Basis Points)
At
in Interest Rates
(1)
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
-100 bp
N/A
N/A
000 bp
—
—
+100 bp
(1.36
)%
(2.32
)%
+200 bp
(4.10
)
(5.54
)
+300 bp
(8.01
)
(9.67
)
(1)
Assumes an instantaneous, parallel, and permanent change in interest rates at all maturities.
The projected percentage change in net interest income was impacted to a lesser degree in the increasing interest rate scenarios at December 31, 2014 than at September 30, 2014. This was largely driven by a change from a negative gap position in the base case scenario at September 30, 2014, to a positive gap position in the base case scenario at December 31, 2014. Due to the change in gap position, it is expected that assets will reprice higher and at a faster pace in a rising interest rate environment at December 31, 2014 compared to September 30, 2014. See the gap table below for additional information.
Net interest income is projected to decrease in a rising interest rate environment at December 31, 2014, despite the positive gap position, due to a projected reduction in cash flows from the Bank's mortgage-related assets and callable agency debentures. In all of the scenarios presented, cash flows from the Bank's assets decrease to such a level that the Bank's liabilities are projected to reprice to higher interest rates at a faster pace than the Bank's assets.
The following table sets forth the estimated percentage change in the MVPE for each period presented based on the indicated instantaneous, parallel, and permanent change in interest rates. The estimated MVPE results from the valuation of cash flows from financial assets and liabilities over the anticipated lives of each for each interest rate environment. The percentage change in each interest rate environment represents the difference between the MVPE in the base case (assumes the forward market interest rates implied by the yield curve are realized) and the MVPE in each alternative interest rate environment (assumes market interest rates have a parallel shift in rates). The estimations of the MVPE used in preparing the table below were based upon the assumptions that the total composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities do not change, that any repricing of assets or liabilities occurs at current product or market rates for the alternative rate environments as of the dates presented, and that different prepayment rates were used in each alternative interest rate environment.
Change
Percentage Change in MVPE
(in Basis Points)
At
in Interest Rates
(1)
December 31, 2014
September 30, 2014
-100 bp
N/A
N/A
000 bp
—
—
+100 bp
(7.27
)%
(9.51
)%
+200 bp
(17.22
)
(21.00
)
+300 bp
(28.19
)
(32.96
)
(1)
Assumes an instantaneous, parallel, and permanent change in interest rates at all maturities.
62
Changes in the estimated market values of our financial assets and liabilities drive changes in estimates of MVPE. The market value of an asset or liability reflects the present value of all the projected cash flows over its remaining life, discounted at current market interest rates. As interest rates rise, generally the market value for both financial assets and liabilities decrease. The opposite is generally true as interest rates fall. The MVPE represents the theoretical market value of capital that is calculated by netting the market value of assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet instruments. If the market values of financial assets increase at a faster pace than the market values of financial liabilities, or if the market values of financial liabilities decrease at a faster pace than the market values of financial assets, the MVPE will increase. The magnitude of the changes in the Bank's MVPE represents the Bank's interest rate risk. The market value of shorter term-to-maturity financial instruments is less sensitive to changes in interest rates than are longer term-to-maturity financial instruments. Because of this, the market values of our certificates of deposit (which generally have relatively shorter average lives) tend to display less sensitivity to changes in interest rates than do our mortgage-related assets (which generally have relatively longer average lives). The average life expected on our mortgage-related assets varies under different interest rate environments because borrowers have the ability to prepay their mortgage loans. Therefore, as interest rates decrease, the WAL of mortgage-related assets decrease as well. As interest rates increase, the WAL would be expected to increase, as well as increasing the sensitivity of these assets in higher rate environments.
The percentage change in the Bank's MVPE is adversely impacted in rising interest rate scenarios at both September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014 due primarily to the Bank's mortgage-related assets and callable investment securities. As interest rates increase, repayments on mortgage-related assets will likely only be realized through changes in borrowers' lives such as divorce, death, job-related relocations, or other life changing events, resulting in an increase in the average life of mortgage-related assets. Similarly, call projections for the Bank's callable agency debentures decrease as interest rates rise, which results in their cash flows moving towards their contractual maturity dates. The longer expected average lives of these assets, relative to the assumptions in the base case interest rate environment, increased the sensitivity of their market value to changes in interest rates. As a result, the market value of the Bank's financial assets decreased more than the decrease in the market value of its financial liabilities, resulting in a decrease in the MVPE in all interest rate environments at both September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2014. However, the percentage change in the Bank's MVPE at December 31, 2014 was less adversely impacted in the increasing interest rate scenarios than at September 30, 2014 due primarily to lower long-term interest rates, particularly lower mortgage interest rates, at December 31, 2014 than at September 30, 2014. The lower long-term interest rates resulted in shorter weighted average lives for these assets in the base case, thereby decreasing the sensitivity of their market values as interest rates increase.
The following gap table summarizes the anticipated maturities or repricing periods of the Bank's interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of December 31, 2014 based on the information and assumptions set forth in the notes below. Cash flow projections for mortgage-related assets are calculated based on current interest rates. Prepayment projections are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and assumptions and, therefore, cannot be determined with a high degree of accuracy. Although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react differently to changes in market interest rates. Assumptions may not reflect how actual yields and costs respond to market interest rate changes. The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in market interest rates. Certain assets, such as ARM loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. In the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the gap table below. For additional information regarding the impact of changes in interest rates, see the preceding Percentage Change in Net Interest Income and Percentage Change in MVPE discussions and tables.
63
Within
Three to
More Than
More Than
Three
Twelve
One Year to
Three Years
Over
Months
Months
Three Years
to Five Years
Five Years
Total
Interest-earning assets:
(Dollars in thousands)
Loans receivable:
(1)
Mortgage loans:
Fixed-rate
$
257,898
$
730,011
$
1,256,460
$
808,216
$
1,898,611
$
4,951,196
Adjustable-rate
92,920
657,801
321,878
105,993
36,557
1,215,149
Other loans
114,741
11,132
5,128
2,070
1,461
134,532
Investment securities
(2)
7,360
1,642
189,438
335,790
8,583
542,813
MBS
(3)
178,477
488,617
476,109
262,691
289,057
1,694,951
Other interest-earning assets
177,996
—
—
—
—
177,996
Total interest-earning assets
829,392
1,889,203
2,249,013
1,514,760
2,234,269
8,716,637
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Checking
(4)
144,000
49,624
114,446
88,221
336,348
732,639
Savings
(4)
69,829
15,278
35,228
27,323
151,442
299,100
Money market
(4)
213,664
146,793
268,596
155,151
473,695
1,257,899
Certificates
383,038
800,375
979,656
358,592
315
2,521,976
Borrowings
(5)
250,000
320,000
1,075,000
550,000
646,140
2,841,140
Total interest-bearing liabilities
1,060,531
1,332,070
2,472,926
1,179,287
1,607,940
7,652,754
Excess (deficiency) of interest-earning assets over
interest-bearing liabilities
$
(231,139
)
$
557,133
$
(223,913
)
$
335,473
$
626,329
$
1,063,883
Cumulative excess (deficiency) of interest-earning
assets over interest-bearing liabilities
$
(231,139
)
$
325,994
$
102,081
$
437,554
$
1,063,883
Cumulative excess (deficiency) of interest-earning
assets over interest-bearing liabilities as a percent of total
Bank assets at December 31, 2014
(2.55
)%
3.60
%
1.13
%
4.83
%
11.75
%
Cumulative one-year gap - interest rates +200 bps
at December 31, 2014
(1.64
)
Cumulative one-year gap at September 30, 2014
(0.82
)
64
(1)
ARM loans are included in the period in which the rate is next scheduled to adjust or in the period in which repayments are expected to occur, or prepayments are expected to be received, prior to their next rate adjustment, rather than in the period in which the loans are due. Fixed-rate loans are included in the periods in which they are scheduled to be repaid, based on scheduled amortization and prepayment assumptions. Balances are net of deferred fees and exclude loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure.
(2)
Based on contractual maturities, term to call dates or pre-refunding dates as of December 31, 2014, at amortized cost.
(3)
Reflects projected prepayments of MBS, at amortized cost.
(4)
Although the Bank's checking, savings, and money market accounts are subject to immediate withdrawal, management considers a substantial amount of these accounts to be core deposits having significantly longer effective maturities. The decay rates (the assumed rates at which the balances of existing accounts decline) used on these accounts is based on assumptions developed from our actual experiences with these accounts. If all of the Bank's checking, savings, and money market accounts had been assumed to be subject to repricing within one year, interest-bearing liabilities which were estimated to mature or reprice within one year would have exceeded interest-earning assets with comparable characteristics by $1.32 billion, for a cumulative one-year gap of -14.6% of total assets.
(5)
Borrowings exclude deferred prepayment penalty costs and deferred gains on terminated interest rate swap agreements.
The change in the one-year gap amount between December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014 was due primarily to an increase in the amount of cash, in excess of the daily leverage strategy, held between periods. The daily leverage strategy is comprised of assets and liabilities that reprice within the three month category, so this strategy has no impact on the Bank's one-year gap position. The increase in cash, in excess of the daily leverage strategy, between periods increased the amount of assets expected to reprice over the 12-month horizon at December 31, 2014 as compared to September 30, 2014, thereby increasing the Bank's one-year gap position. Additionally, interest rates were lower at December 31, 2014 than at September 30, 2014, resulting in an increase in prepayment projections on the Bank's mortgage loan and MBS portfolios, as well as an increase in the amount of securities projected to be called, resulting in an increase in the amount of assets expected to reprice over the 12-month horizon. If interest rates were to increase 200 basis points, as of December 31, 2014, the Bank's one-year gap is projected to be -1.6% of total assets.
65
The following table presents the weighted average yields/rates and WALs (in years), after applying prepayment, call assumptions, and decay rates for our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of the date presented. Yields presented for interest-earning assets include the amortization of fees, costs, premiums and discounts which are considered adjustments to the yield. The interest rate presented for term borrowings is the effective rate, which includes the net impact of the amortization of deferred prepayment penalties resulting from the prepayment of certain FHLB advances and deferred gains related to interest rate swaps previously terminated. The loan terms presented for one- to four-family loans represent the contractual terms of the loan.
December 31, 2014
Amount
Yield/Rate
WAL
% of Category
% of Total
(Dollars in thousands)
Investment securities
$
539,012
1.18
%
2.9
24.0
%
6.1
%
MBS - fixed
1,219,534
2.35
3.7
54.2
13.7
MBS - adjustable
491,697
2.26
6.6
21.8
5.5
Total investment securities and MBS
2,250,243
2.04
4.1
100.0
%
25.3
Loans receivable:
Fixed-rate one- to four-family:
<= 15 years
1,158,162
3.40
3.9
18.3
%
13.0
> 15 years
3,654,833
4.12
5.7
57.9
41.1
All other fixed-rate loans
169,075
4.55
3.2
2.7
1.9
Total fixed-rate loans
4,982,070
3.97
5.2
78.9
56.0
Adjustable-rate one- to four-family:
<= 36 months
360,746
2.07
3.9
5.7
4.1
> 36 months
824,181
2.91
3.0
13.0
9.3
All other adjustable-rate loans
150,254
4.35
1.2
2.4
1.7
Total adjustable-rate loans
1,335,181
2.85
3.0
21.1
15.1
Total loans receivable
6,317,251
3.73
4.8
100.0
%
71.1
FHLB stock
121,306
5.89
2.9
1.4
Cash and cash equivalents
208,642
0.25
—
2.2
Total interest-earning assets
$
8,897,442
3.26
4.5
100.0
%
Transaction deposits
$
2,183,036
0.16
6.5
46.4
%
29.1
%
Certificates of deposit
2,521,976
1.17
1.5
53.6
33.6
Total deposits
4,705,012
0.70
3.8
100.0
%
62.7
Term borrowings
2,795,000
2.55
3.0
37.3
Total interest-bearing liabilities
$
7,500,012
1.39
3.5
100.0
%
66
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the "Act") as of December 31, 2014. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2014, such disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Act) that occurred during the Company's quarter ended December 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company and the Bank are involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. In our opinion, after consultation with legal counsel, we believe it unlikely that such pending legal actions will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to our risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. For a summary of risk factors relevant to our operations, see Part I, Item 1A. in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
See "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital" in "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" regarding OCC restrictions on dividends from the Bank to the Company.
The following table summarizes our share repurchase activity during the quarter ended December 31, 2014 and additional information regarding our share repurchase program. In November 2012, the Company announced its Board of Directors approved a $175.0 million stock repurchase program. This plan has no expiration date.
Approximate
Total
Total Number of
Dollar Value of
Number of
Average
Shares Purchased as
Shares that May
Shares
Price Paid
Part of Publicly
Yet Be Purchased
Purchased
per Share
Announced Plans
Under the Plan
October 1, 2014 through
October 31, 2014
302,145
$
11.99
302,145
$
42,803,878
November 1, 2014 through
November 30, 2014
—
—
—
42,803,878
December 1, 2014 through
December 31, 2014
—
—
—
42,803,878
Total
302,145
11.99
302,145
42,803,878
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
67
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits.
68
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
CAPITOL FEDERAL FINANCIAL, INC.
Date: February 4, 2015
By:
/s/ John B. Dicus
John B. Dicus, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 4, 2015
By:
/s/ Kent G. Townsend
Kent G. Townsend, Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
69
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
Document
3(i)
Charter of Capitol Federal Financial, Inc., as filed on May 6, 2010, as Exhibit 3(i) to Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-166578) and incorporated herein by reference
3(ii)
Bylaws of Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. as filed on May 6, 2010, as Exhibit 3(ii) to Capitol Federal Financial Inc.'s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-166578) and incorporated herein by reference
10.1(i)
Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.'s Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as amended, filed on May 10, 2011 as Exhibit 10.1(ii) to the March 31, 2011 Form 10-Q for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc., and incorporated herein by reference
10.1(ii)
Form of Change of Control Agreement with each of John B. Dicus, Kent G. Townsend, and Rick C. Jackson filed on January 20, 2011 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference
10.1(iii)
Form of Change of Control Agreement with each of Natalie G. Haag and Carlton A. Ricketts filed on November 29, 2012 as Exhibit 10.1(iv) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference
10.1(iv)
Form of Change of Control Agreement with Frank H. Wright filed on November 29, 2013 as Exhibit 10.1(v) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference
10.2
Capitol Federal Financial's 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the "Stock Option Plan") filed on April 13, 2000 as Appendix A to Capitol Federal Financial's Revised Proxy Statement (File No. 000-25391) and incorporated herein by reference
10.3
Capitol Federal Financial's 2000 Recognition and Retention Plan filed on April 13, 2000 as Appendix B to Capitol Federal Financial's Revised Proxy Statement (File No. 000-25391) and incorporated herein by reference
10.4
Capitol Federal Financial Deferred Incentive Bonus Plan, as amended, filed on May 5, 2009 as Exhibit 10.4 to the March 31, 2009 Form 10-Q for Capitol Federal Financial and incorporated herein by reference
10.5
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the Stock Option Plan filed on February 4, 2005 as Exhibit 10.5 to the December 31, 2004 Form 10-Q for Capitol Federal Financial and incorporated herein by reference
10.6
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Stock Option Plan filed on February 4, 2005 as Exhibit 10.6 to the December 31, 2004 Form 10-Q for Capitol Federal Financial and incorporated herein by reference
10.7
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Recognition and Retention Plan filed on February 4, 2005 as Exhibit 10.7 to the December 31, 2004 Form 10-Q for Capitol Federal Financial and incorporated herein by reference
10.8
Description of Named Executive Officer Salary and Bonus Arrangements filed on November 26, 2014 as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference
10.9
Description of Director Fee Arrangements filed on August 1, 2014 as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant's June 30, 2014 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference
10.10
Short-term Performance Plan filed on August 4, 2011 as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant's June 30, 2011 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference
10.11
Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Incentive Plan") filed on December 22, 2011 as Appendix A to Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.'s Proxy Statement (File No. 001-34814) and incorporated herein by reference
10.12
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the Equity Incentive Plan filed on February 6, 2012 as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant's December 31, 2011 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference
10.13
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the Equity Incentive Plan filed on February 6, 2012 as Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant's December 31, 2011 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference
10.14
Form of Stock Appreciation Right Agreement under the Equity Incentive Plan filed on February 6, 2012 as Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant's December 31, 2011 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference
10.15
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Equity Incentive Plan filed on February 6, 2012 as Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant's December 31, 2011 Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference
11
Calculations of Basic and Diluted EPS (See "Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements – Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 2 – Earnings Per Share")
31.1
Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 made by John B. Dicus, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
31.2
Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 made by Kent G. Townsend, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
70
32
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 made by John B. Dicus, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kent G. Townsend, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
101
The following information from the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2015, has been formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the three months ended December 31, 2014, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and (vi) Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
71